Star. — London, England, 1829-02-27 00:00:00

'Armagh,llyniona. Antrim. arson% Loritihm, e i ny. 'more. Cat herr y. Kildare—A parish in Montruserithire; somber re the county of Cavan t . Deeciiihrie4 the town of 'Sall tjamesduff. Mr. G EORGE MOORE presented a Midas, respec tably signed, against Emancipatidis, from the Protestant Noblemen, Clergymen, Gentry, and Landowners of the eoontr and city of Limerick. Mr. LLOYD said the petition *as signed by several 'respectable individuals. but it did not represent one 'tenth of the property of the county and city of Lime 'rick; and be was confident, that since the Ministers had declared their intention of removing Catholic disabili ties, sht most respectable persons whose names were attached to the petitions did not wish to obstruct that sueasOlt. Mr. TRANT said, he had been acquainted with the 'comity of Limerick many years, and he could assure 'the House no change had Wren place there in conse- Nusence of his Majesty's Speech. He had that morning •scsiesrJ a letter front the Secretary of the Limerick 'Brunswick Club, imploring him to °pp's', as much as possible, all further concessions to the Catholics. Mr. GEORGE MOORE said be could assure Hon. Members that the petitioners bad not changed their opinions; and it ohm were any Protestants in Iceland that bad, they ought to state it. He believed the 00- *sion against Emancipation was stronger than ever. , Mr. HUME mast protest against the doctrine of the Hon. Member for Dublin calling upon all those who wets favourable to the Catholic Minis to publicly stalls their opinions. Silence gave consent, and be took it toe.graated. that those who were silent were in favour of Emencipation—s(tlear). The Petition, was then brought up and read. Mr. MOORE presented Petittons from the Protes tant inhabitants of Drogheda. Youghal, and some town in Armagh, against further concessions to the Catholics. - Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. MOORE presented a Petition from Sir Charles Mallet, Bart. praying the House to take into conside ration some plan for the amelioration of the Poor of Leland. Toe Honourable Member observed, that he had not the honour of a personal acquaintance with the worthy Baronet, and was therefore not prepared to pro nounce upon the merits of the Petition; but as the peti tioner was actuated solely by benevolence and charity, be trusted it would meet with every attention. He weed that it should. be printed. Mr. BARING wished to know whether It was the custom of the Meow to print private Petitions of this fort? Mr. 1.1001(11 urged kit torest, mad it was ordered to be printed. Mr. WELLS prenatal a Petition front the Minister and Congregation of Maidstone, and one from Kings. town, in dm parish of Maidstone, against any further concession to the Roman Catholics. The Petitions from Os town of Maidstone were numerously and most re ageetably signed, not procured by going from house to hope. He had read the Petitions, and lie concurred _oast heartily with the sentiments the petitioners ex ptessed. They were brought forward in consequence of the petitioners being abandoned by the desertion of those they considered as guardians of the Protestant in sweats. They theiefure prayed that Parliament would not grant further concessions to the Roman Catholics. especially to admit them to this Hoist. For himself he was an advocate for toleration, and was therefore afraid of the intolerant spirit of the Roman Catholics prevailing in the essential pan of the Government of this country. es' ty Roman Catholic Members might govern the House of Commons. He would rather have a Popish King than a Popish Parliament, sod would therefore resist the measures ploposed by the adminis tration. - He disapproved of the mode of bringing for eratd the. measure after. the King's Speech. which to. nmasendedit for the deliberation of Parliament; but 'k was afterwards captained that it was with the King's consent it was to be introduced. This he considered as unconstitutional. He should maintain his opinion, and support it by his vote, though it was to be called fac tions. base, or inhumes. This be thought was more the language of the House of Stuart than of the House of Binnswick. Whilst be continued to feel that the disabilties could not be removed without danger to the Protestant Constitution, be should certainly oppose the measure. Mr. ROBARTS said that, notwithstanding the peti. Lion which his Hon. colleague presented, there were, to his own knowledge. a great number of very respectable ibdivideals, indeed, men of the highest rank in Maid stone, who were in 'favour of Catborie Emancipation; and he bad no doubt that when the proposed measures should be carried into effect they would give very go' aural satisfaction. Mr. COLLETT presented Petitions, from the ROM, sad Omeorepadopol the peddle( Meador. apd two other parish* In the amity af neod sad aostroso a pod* In Haaspehiro, orient farther eetweeders to the Remus Cathodes. Pasidasa or the seas. offset swore peomeed Mr. Tamer, from *TOM i l er edred e n. fa the wag et this peddles Melton. was stood by every todi is the tali* het two)—by Seism Lsweabe. from Kendal ; mamas, free Kinaftwelge. horn de Arehtlesosory of sad from three other plasm Weed NIEL gemmed throe Peddoas against soy farther to the loom Catholics—ma frost the Arck4easeory of elgool by am peewee; sad see fres lanes, to the by Sid penewk •Ws T. LITIk e IrDG peesemed Suer. Petitions-4nm Wel. Naito% boo Bub Samoa. from Peeddread. sod frees Taws; all wines further cetweedeas to die Raman Cathedra. Mr. WILSON, in rising to present a Petition against further concessions to the Roman Catholics. said, that en the appointment, of the present . Administration be bad determined to be setisfied with his Royal Master's abases and he had then. declared that be would give, hismapport to the Ministers, but it was only when they acted. tussistently. He could not now,. consistently with his dal, to his .cpistittlents, or consistently with his ow& .Caoscience,. rapport them. , The appoint? AMU tills Royal. Master, was good enough for him. lle_ll4. not cite whether;' toe M inisters were Whigs Sr Terries. Whigs and Tories were all alike to him— (Loud laughter). He would stand by the Government Merely measure but the present. He bore no.animosity to the Roman Catholics; for many of them be bad a high respect; but he thought it was inconsistent with common sense, if common sense was to have any, part In their deliberations, that-Catholics should legislate for a Piotestant country. He 'repeated that he regretted be could not pull with the Ministers on this occasion. /bey had been chosen by his Royal Master, and that wasenough for him: He did not care whether they were Whigs or Tories. He would stand by the Con. stitution. He would support it on the staff .)d. He galled on all true Prote.tants to stand bsv rard and m ',eet the sacred barrier sorbich their ancestors had otected for the safety of the Church and State. He -was no true Protestant who n ould sit quiet and allow that sacred barrier to be pulled down. He hoped io Gun, and trusted he would not be. deceived, ithat .Pa vrosace would .frotity his .Royal Master's rears to stand out against he torrent which was about lonneemp t.w Stare--(Laughter). He was sorry forthe . li n. Members who had so feverish a cause to support .eattld oat listen iltietly to his arguments. He, l'lot‘sht Alinistars *old pause.... demo timesbetorc tf.ey took inch a fatal step. lie was himself a staunch riolgesot. There was uo Man bad a more rigid resold Fru Church sad State. ether& was no aria more . WA He would stick to theConstitation through thick and thin. He had every respect for Roman Catholics as indivi duals. but if his own father was a Roman Catholic be would not suffer him to legislate for Protestants. It was inconsistent with common seise. No man felt ante for the distressesof the people of Ireland than he did, end if any substantial measure was proposed for' their relief he world join hand in hand with Ministers —join himself to the yoke, and endeavour to amend the Bill. He felt for the suffering of the Irish but Catlinlic I Emancipation was not a remedy for those sufferings. He put it to this House, what did this outcry for EMAD• cipation mean? It only meant chat the Papists wanted to possess themselves of the temporalities of the Protes tant Church. That was what was meant by Catholic Emancipation—(Hear. and laughter). Any Hon. Mem. her who had read the speech of Mr. O'Connell, the leader of the Irish parliament, on the Wedne.day be. fore the meeting of Parliament, must come to the same conclusion. Much as he disliked the political principles of Mr. O'Connell, there was one part cf his character which be admired. He did not beat About the bush—he came forward boldly, and told what he wanted. There was no difficulty in gathering from what he said that he would never be satisfied until he got inside the bar of that House, and mowed down the Protestant Church—(Laughter). He re. pea'ed that such was the avowed object of Mr. O'Connell. and he (Mr. Wilson) thought hm one of the finest fellows he ever met, merely because he openly avowed his opinions and told what bewanted (Laughter). What did his Majesty's Ministers mean by the plan , now in contemplation ? The system proposed was like robbing Peter to pay Paul. To satisfy the Catholics. the Protestant Church was to be sacrificed. As to the poor of Ireland, it was merely deluding them Ito say that their distress would be mitigated by admit ting Roman Catholics to Parliament. fle would inform the poor of Ireland that the same pauperism and distress which now eaisted would exist alter emancipation as it was called, was granted—(Heat). He (Mr. W ilson) had great confidence in the Noble and Gallant Duke at the head of his Majesty's Government, and he trusted to GOD that the country would not be deceived in him. He hoped, if the Noble Duke pulled Awn the existing securities with one hand, he would establish something to support the Protestant Church with the other hand. As for his own part, he mould wait until the curtain was hauled up, and he should see what new light had broken in upon his Majesty's Ministers; for his own part be could see none—(Laugher). The Protestant commu nity were now roused, and he was sure they would not allow themselves to be cramped from expressing their sentiments. The sentiments he had now uttered in a homespun manner were his conscientious sentiments; and those sentiments be would never he.itate to avow. Considering the course which the Right Ho:mused, Secretary for the Home Department pursued sawn Mr. Canning was in power, Isis late conduct had ex. cited suspicion throughout the country. He (Mr. Wib son) was as much thunderstruck when the Right Ho msorable Gentleman endeaveured to explain the King's h as if be had knocked him down in the middle the floor. This was a strong expression, but it con veyed no more than he felt. The country was thunder. struck at the conduct of the Right Honourable Gentle man ; but the feeling of the country had not been roused, and his Majesty's Government would find that nine tombs of the Protestant community were opposed to the admission of Catholics to political power. What ever course other Memberothought proper to pursue, he (Mr. Wilson) would do his duty to Iris constituents end his country to the best of his ability, withoto fear, sod. without fee or reward ; and he would conclude with a homely couplet. and we — Whilst I eau handle stick or stone • I shall uphold the Church and Throne," (Hear and laughter). The Hon. Member then presented a petition from the , inhabitants of the city of York, against any further concessions to the Roman Catho lics.—The petition was ordered to be printed. Sit FRANCIS BLAKE preowned a Petition front Berwick g:Lreed, praying for the rejeal of the home and window tact. to Ile on the table. Lord GEORGE BENTINCK presented a Petition from the Vulgarise Dimmers of Itag's Lyon In favour of the Roman Cm tholle Viscount CLEMENTS presented a similar Petition from the latish of &bridge, country of Leitrim. Mr. ROBERT PA LM KR presented a Petition from the la. Inhalants of the borough of Reading. against any further Comes lions to the Catholics. Mr. MONCK crested that the House would permit him to say a few words oo the presentation of this Petition. He c old not but congratulate the friends of religious liberty in the great progress which this ques. Akin bad recently made in the town and vicinity of Reading. This was proved by the paucity of signatures attached to the present petition. Though the movers and promoters of it had left it for a fortnight in the most public places in the town, and had used all their endeavours to get it numerously signed, by advertising for signatures in the newspapers, they had not been able to obtain, out of the numerous population ia that town and neighbourhood more than 600 signatures— (Hear). ta opposition to the prayer of that petition he could say. that a great majority of the most influential persons in that district were—he would not say in favour of Catholic Emancipation, but—in favour of heaving the whole question to the exclusive consideration of Parliament. As he was now on his legs, he would venture to pay the hued& tribute of his applause to his Majesty's Minions for their determination to make this a Government question. Mr. FYSHE PALMER—I shall make a shorter speech even than that which you have just heard from my Hon. Colleague; and I merely make it to say that it is surprising that a petition so mildly worded. signed se it is by the Mayor, • and by the senior Alderman of the Borough of Reading, should only have received 600 ,signatures, when it lay for two market-days ready. • to.. be signed by the numerous population which regularly Rocks to Reading market. The House will recollect that the petition is signed by 600 persons. inhabitants of the tows and its vicinity. When I reflect on this, I feel myself justified in saying, that the opi nions of the inhabitants of the town and neighbourhood of Reading, on this qnestion, has changed, very ma tonally. within the last few years.—Laid on the table. Mr. SLANET brought in a Bill to regulate the Payment of Labourers' Wages out of the Peon' Rates.—Read a first tiros. Lord LOWTHER postponed Ms motion for Consolidating the Laws relating,to Wpods and Forests, until Tuesday senniglite Mr. LSROWNLOW rose calming forward his motion relative to the drainage of bogs in Ireland. That there was a great unemployed population in Ireland no per son could deny. Millions in that country were in the deepest. distress; is this country the lowest were not without the necessarie9, and even some of the comforts of lite. This was not so in Ireland, lot there they had mo system of poor laws. It was proved before the Irish .Committee, that in Ireland there were millions who rose in the morning without knowing hew or Where they were.to procure subsistence for the day. The coon. quence of this state of things was emigration to a large amount. This was as much an . English as an Irish question; for unless some remedy were applied, the consequence would be that the tate of wages in Eng. , . land Wisei r a ieme to the"einte laid its In Wand, sad be productive of the same distress. It appeared that there were In Ireland three million acres of land fully capable of improvement and cultivation. Teem wastes, however, were, from want of exertion, every day pies from bad to worse. His object was to the ace dot of a court. to be called the Omn i :Mr:nage, the duty of which wr old be to take cognisance of ad mat ten connected with drainage, and having powers similar to those of the Commissioners of Sewers in England. The Honorable Gentleman concluded by moving for leave to bring in the Bill. Mr. LYTTLETON seconded the motion. He was aware, from actual observation, that the plan proposed was not impracticable, for the estate of his Honourable Friend (Mr. Browolow) presented one of the finest spe cimens of successful drainage which be ever saw in that or any other country. , Mr. LESLIE FOSTER concurred generally in the views of the Hon. Member, but he thought dime would be many difficulties in carrying the plan into execution. The want of alnowledge of the boundaries of estates was one obitaele to the scheme; the right of common was another difficulty; but this might pet haps be got rid oft, by giving to the tenants some portion of the bog in lieu of their right of common. He should prefer also, instead of the course proposed by the Hon. Member (Mr. Brownlow), the appointment of one or two able and intelligent engineers. Mr. SLAMSv and air. WAIII4IIIIIIOII spoke in favour of the snedoe. Lord F. L. GOWER thought the best way would be to move for a Committee. It was impossible not to me, by the three reports on this subject, that the greatest advantage would be derived from the drainage it carried into effect. In the triangle tales by the Engineers io the centre of Ireland, there were not less than 230.000 acres of morass, no part of which was less 1620114 feet above the adjoining country. Mr. GRANT expressed his approbation of the mea sure. It must at first be productive of retef, but the same inconvenience of over population must again arise unless some change were effected in the habits of tt e people. His only obj-ct in rising was to gaud the Hon.. against forming over-sanguine hopes from any, plan of this kihd. Mr. WALLACE slid be doubted whether this mat ter was yet ripe for legislation. Mr. BROWNLOW said, if this Bill shoOld be sac cessful, it was his intention to follow it tip by an Enclo sure Bill. This would remove meet' the principal ob jections of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Mr. L Foster). Hoshould propose, if the Bill was permitted to be read a second time, to have it referred to a Cora■ mittee up stair;. After a few words In explanation IN= Mr. L Forraa, lease was even to brims in the BM. CATHOLIC PETITIONS. Mr. O'NEILL broueht forward his motion, " That a list be fureished weekly to the Members of dui Hots., containing the names of all persons - in Great Britain from whom Petitions for or against Roman Catholics are forwarded to the House, and stating the number of signature& to each Petition, and the amour t of the pa potation of such places according to the last census; and that the first list shall include the Petitions al ready presented." He considered it was important that the House should have this information; and he expressed his astonishment at the changes that had taken pl ice on this question. He could not under stand how the justice of that could be seen hi 1829, which was deniei in 1827-111 the cinwnstances being the same. It was now sought to bleak dawn the noble structure of our Constitution—and that from some temporary notions of expediency and secu rity. Such grounds for agreeing to the concessions were unworthy of Legislators. Those who were of the other side, however, took to themselves all the eloquence, talent, and integrity; and also all the cardinal virtues. The plan contemplated by his motion was requisite. He added, that there had been 120 Petitions presented against, and 220 in favour of, the Catholic Claims, but as to the number of signatures they had no means of judging. • He wished to know what were the real sen timents of the people. They could not give the Pro testants the vantage ground they had lost, but they might place in their hands the constitutional weapons of Petitions, to save them from the disgrace of sot rendering at discretion. He concluded' with moving his Resolution. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER'S ob jection to this motion was, that if it was agreed to, upon all possible subjects, a weekly comparison must be made of the petitioners who applied to Parliament. Numbers t f signatures could not be the real criterion of public opinion. Intelligence and talent should not be weighed against numbers; and he was prepared to say, that the weight assigned to Petitions would make against the object of the Hon. Member. For instance. the Petition of Mr. Stockdale was not to be weighed against that from the parish of St. James's—(Hear). Again, would he put Petitions from the Clergy on the same footing as those from mete numbers? On every public principle be must altogether oppose the motion. Mr.TRANT could not see any advantage that would attend the passing of the Honourable Gentleman's mo tion. He objected to it as it might form a prece dent; mad he also regretted the notion that had been circulated, that upon the question now agitated the Aristocracy ought aloes to be considered as compe tent to form an opinion. The great m gas of the peo pie, who were sow receiving more ethic rtion than for merly, conceived that the measure about to be intro- doted was closely connected with their religious and civil liberty. If the Right Hon. Gentleman did not pay attention to the observatilns which had been made, the measure might produce very fatal consequences. He would remind the House of a speech made by Mr. Canning on the subject. That Statesman bad said, that the question ought never to be made a Government question. It ought never to be proposed by Ministers, unless it had first worked its way through the Legisla ture, and through the amour/ ; that the mass of resist ance, although inert, might be fearfully moved by any attempt to introduce emancipation. He trussed the prophecy of Mr. Canning might not be fulfilled. He bad conceived that an atterapt like the present would produce greater evils than a divided Cabinet, or than any that now existed. Mr. aN EILL denied that this motion could be drawn into precedent, for no change similar to that now to be introduced, could be anticipated. The motion would not detract from the value of any person's vote or sig nature. It would show the people how far their Re. presentatives bad adhered to their pledges of support ing their wishes. He would withdraw his motion, as it did not meet with general concurrence. The Motion was tt,en withdrawn. The House proceeded to the Orders of the Day. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Reduction of Fees upon Tomah, Hoed Bills. and an Address to his Majesty, praying tbat their anima WOK be made good Ns the man of the Home, to wit= they bad been ancient mak menu of Aim Ik. LITTLETON eF i t i lds oginbsdea at the savarre la whisk Me Itiabt Elsa. bed essided es die papll. wild' be bad %Miele k day es sad, is the last desduk lbe whet Orden d Day being aided, si soh AM= the Nem edivereed. UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD SUCTION. Tintassay. Vs. a. Yesterday morning the city of Orford presented the full appearance of the eve of a tumultuous election... During the preceding night post-chaises had wive* with voters from all parts of the kingdom, and the can vass seemed to have been conducted with the greaten activity. Many of the Gentlemen came Upwards of 200 miles; *those bons the north Mere principally in the interest of Mr. Peel; those horn the west in that of Sr Hobert Inglis; from the latter district. however, par. ticislarly from Ezeter. Mr. Peel's friends expect this evening a considerable reinforcement. Thee is no doebt that the contest will be a very severe one, the patties being mutually determined to poll the last man who offers himself. In the contest of 1821. between Sir John Nicholl and Mr. Heber, the poll was continued into the third day, and it will pro. bably in the present case last at least as long ; and even Monday is talked of. as they say 1,1300 have promised the respective candidates to v te. Seeml of the heads of Colleges still persevere in their determination Mr.. main neutral l +bile others, tst:h as Christchurch, Boum nose, Sic. are divided. Di. Lu-bington, and the principal Gentlemen of the L radon Bar, arrived early yesterday morning. The arrangements for this day are, that the business is to be adjourned at six o'clock in the evening, and to teems. Mence at ten o'clock on Ptiday, and then continue till late at night. All the sons eif the Ministers who have votes are Mme; with the families of several of the Whip. Amongst is em ate— Lord Apsity, Honourable Mrs liatherst, Lewd Morpoth. MI4 Charles Wynn l Sir Juin Sew-.U, Mr. liehlionee tlato Under Snow vary), Lord Clifton, Mr. Sergeant ; Dr. Phollastwo ; Lord 'Mangum ; Sir T.Tymelik ; Mr. R. Gordan, Mr. Lawreese Peel. Mr. Dawson, Mr. M. A. Taylor, and several other Ilombers of Parliament. Tne Convocation sat at twelve o'clock; the Vice. Chancellor ' Dr. Jones, presiding, surrounded tight and left by the Heads of Houses, and a little more advanced the Doctors. In the area were the Masters of Aft' and Students, and some others. After the usual cetomosies and the reading of the forms, Dr. govt.& the Venerable and Learned President of Magdalen College. proposed Sir Robert Harry Inglis; and Dr. MAMMY, warders of Merton, proposed the Right Hon. Rabat Peel. Dr. MAnaMAM craved leave of the Vice-Chaacelloe to address the convocation in the vernacular tongue, which being granted be spoke to the following effect t.— Mr. Vice• Chancellor, I cannot but regret that the no. mination of the Right Hon. Mr. Peel should have fallen upon this occasion to the hands of a person so unable as I am to bring forward the nomination of that Gentleman in-the manner in which it might have been brought forward by other perions present in this meet ing. I cannot but feel regret at this; but I shall ended your to counteract its effects by activity and zeal. I em animated on this occasion, not only by private friend ship. but what is more. by a regard for the interests of the University, by zeal for the Established Church, and by love for my country. Had I stood up twelve yea,' ago to propose Mr. Peel as a burgess for this [hewer. iity, I should have done so with fear and trembling. I should then have said that I recommend to your notice a young man who has trodden all the paths of literature open to youth by ibis University ; a young man to *bom belongs all the principles of religion, morality, and civil liberty here inculcateJ; but I must also here add. that he wanted caper iesice. Now, however,tbe case is dillies eat after 14 years zealously employed in our service. 01 Her lion unreniitted,escept when called upon by hisSovertigts to 0 the highest offices of state. These are services a tech no man will attempt to deny. I will, theref ne, paw on to the question, which forms the only ground of obj c tion to Mr. Peel, the great question of Catholic Eman cipation. lan, p• 'haps. the only person of my age in his Majesty's dominions who has not had an opportunity of rec.rdieg by a vote his sentime its on that question. I ihink it a most perplexing one. I know what it has produced—it has produced a divided Parli intent, a divided country, and a divided people. I feel the hardship of excluding a large portion of our felloe• objects from the privileges of the Constitution ; and I also know the restless, domineering spirit of the Clutch of Rome—(Loud cries of " Hear" from all parts of the Convocation Hquse). I have beard the arguments of those whe ask the question, why the Roman Catholics are so excluded, and of those who think it for the benefit of the community chit it should be so—l am ao are that, under the Consfioution as at present framed, the nation has for a century and a half enjoyed a greater share of power and prosperity than it ever did before— and I am led to consider the present state of the ques tion as one of the greatest difficulty ; and, also, that those who espouse both sides of it—(Hear, bear )—ars actuated by one common oh iect—tbe public good. (Heat). --I will not deny that the course hitherto taken by this University has been adverse to the Catholic claims—(Hear) —l will not deny that one chief cause that induced it to return Mr. Peel as representative was the course he bad formed% evolved and adopted with regard to this question—(Hear)—and I will not deny that the University has. on various occasions, addressed --I might say advised—the Legislature respecting it. I come now to refer to a circumstance which occurred on the sth February. It is well known that a Meeting of Convoeati a was held here to consider of a Petition to both Houses of Parliament on this question. A Petition was brought forward—and 1 feel it my dot, to state that it was couched in strong but manly language, that it was carried by a large majority, and might be considered as supporting the views of the .Univetsity. At that time, however. the University did not know that his hi.jihty had bees graciously pleased to gob. mit the conaideratioo of the question to both House's .if Pailiament, whether the disabilities affecting his Roman Catholic subjecis might not be remove.l T— (Cries of " Poll, poll"). It is my belief that if Ide Majesty's gracious pleasure bad bees then knows --(Disapprobation and cries of " Poll, doll").-- I repeat, if it had beet: thee known to the Mese ef cams:sties, I behave they would have felt themselves bound to passe befits they: mine to the declaim they did that day —( Loud airs of 0 No. oe," and * Pell"). This may, perhaps, be matter of .plain... I mir self ant eel, exprealog my opinien—(Lsughter). I knew di loyalty of this indent Univenity—(hear)—l bees whet k Ms odhrad Mae came e/ loyaky.—(bear)—.ad I de set believe, that It khan bees knows that his Away was sheet to maim the ersi smaiseths—thegredoes tweamselcatisa I will eel k--so Paris most, which bee been made—l do not believe that this easeeta. den meld have passed a vote atewseedni to a veto et Me Me listy's_prepsdery die emaldentlan of this Cris. et" No, se, as r) In referris lei Mr. Peers relive s's...6 =l de net mum Se Milleptils of die seem he has takes on this 'make ; I believe It le have hem mauled by a sandmen ef Mom; that will Sad Its way to every hones and aelightesed bessm—(Cries of 0 fishnet" and 06 Every risk men bosom!" aM. r 14 .) ' I dish I most be missedevetoed in what I ham said. I steed thse hawse, mamba blame l ia l ; o g iftea u, w h a t ti h ra ir res t PrilbeiSit te a dis Weirdly. 1 de cat rhis for WM, door se ; but I mom hdp began rat • g : : . pieced es le a very Inglosog dielnias - qtalgAgsr)••• ' lb we mast either rears Me to Mame without tames she stemes a which balad mod, or tern our becks es a faille Y and basest eervest—(Crim el " No, ! mt./MN r)—who les served es for the Mat codes years, aied vrbe. I am comiseed, se s stesmem, sew sets trips die shun* metes ef pub dmy 'I -1 ‘ 4 , 4, 1 -416 ite+: difir ii 6 id .s frop .0- Ist) tad. OA ber red ear as nog illy liii dly, ~ ~j