Star. — London, England, 1827-07-09 00:00:00

! .i. I • I . d ' ,.. •• .., 1 , - . 1 ti I I I . • • 1 i 1 . I I ' , . ' ..: f l ,. . ~ ; • i 1 :, • • I 1 11' 4 , jr rd I • instituted in the- Consistory Court, which pronounced that the husband had Csiled, and dismissed the wife...-. The suit was then brought by appeal before this Conn The question was, whether the parties could be consi dered, in the terms of the Act-S Geo. IV. e 75. see. 2. as so living together as husband and wife up to 4141 passing of that Act r itivlivich ease the marriage, though invalid under the old Martlage Act of 26 Geo. IL would be confirmed. Dr. ARNOLD, for the respondent, contended that, al though it might appear a solecism and inconsistency-to maintain that parties living apart from each other were living together as man and site, yet the proposition was perfectly true, taking die former part of it in inch.. slaty and colloquial sense, and the latter in its legal act ceptation. The matrimonial tie was still sub.isting be• tween these parties, who had done nothing to shew that they, in legal sense, renounced it; and if this class of marriages was not provided for by the clause, the Le gislature would have failed in doing what it was their declared intention to do, —namely, remedy a grievance occasioned by the old law. Dr. &uniforms, on the other side, observed, that if the clause in question bore the construction put upon It by Dr. Arnold, its effect would be to bastardize the issue of many marriages contracted since 1822, on the presumption that a former marriage. in violation of the old law, was altogether invalid. 'The Act of S G. IV. e. 71, was passed to render valid marriages previously ipaofodo void by reason of a want of consent of either party ; and the object of the second clause was to render valid not all, biat certain marriages, where the parties cotitinued to live together till death, or till the passing of the Act, or 011 they discontinued cohabitation for this purpose, or during the pendency of a snit for annulling the same. The true meaning of ti continuing to live together' was, continuing to keep up the association of husband and wife in a manner which shewed an adhew rence to the nuptial tie. The object of the Statute ' to relieve parties who had observed, and still observed, their nuptial engagements. from being considered as unmarried; not to joie persons who had lived eight ears apart, and bad actually abandoned their m arria g e. hese were not the aggrieved pawns whom the Act professed to relieve. Sir JoHN NICROLL, in giving sentence, observed, that the question was an important one. No inveiglement or unequal alliance was alleged in the present case. Althobgh the father of the man condemned the mar riage when he knew it, the objection was founded upon the youth of the parties, and their inability to maintain themselves. The bond executed by the husband, and accepted by the wife, was no act of legal separation; if a child had been afterwards born, it would have been • regarded as legitimate. The case depended upon the construction of the Act of S George IV. c. 75; and wilco there was an ambiguity in the terms of an Act, It became a question whether the interpretation should be liberal or strict ? Now the object of the Legislature was-to render valid all marriages of minors without consent, unless there bad been some act done which 'hewed they considered the marriage as void, before the pasing of the Act. The presumption was strong in favour of the fact of marriage: sayer preen:miter pro statriotonio was the tole of law, and also of morality and justice. Tne facts of this individual case were not material; but they spoke little in favour of the husband, who alleged his own perjury as ground for relief. That the construction of the Act should be liberal, was shewn by the preamble: it was a remedial Act passed to relieve parties from evils and injuries.—. Looking to this rule, the living together was to be no-' derstcod where the marriage obligation was recognises '`.• whether the parties resided in the same house, or, fi the sake of convenience, or from absence abroad, separated from each other ; for these consentietst sepal. twos were not recognised by law, unless accompanied by some legal acts. lie (Sir John Nichol]) should Win thus far be strongly disposed to hold that, in this case, the parties lived together in the eye of the law, although they were apart. But, whatever doubt the Court might entertain of the clause itself, the subsequent exceptions confirmed the view taken of it, for exceptio probed replant. The exceptions in the Act were—lit, where the marriage had been declared invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction ; secondly, whets another marriage had been contracted by one party in the life-time of the other; thirdly. where the invalidity of the marriage had been decided or acted upon sn any trial at law ; and fourthly, where a sentence had been passed where a Court of Law or Equity had presumed the invalidity of the first marriage. Neither of these exceptions applied to the present case. This Court. therefore. concurred in the view taken of the question in the Consistorr Court, affirmed its sentence, and remitted the cause. COATIS. AGAINST ALLWOOD. Thit was a suit by a legatee against the executor, under a will in which the testator left the interest of 10,0001. 3 per Cents. to his widow daring life. The widow was dead, and the executor refused to pay the legacy, amounting to 5001. alleging there were no assets in his hands. It appeared, however, that he had paid the interest due to the widow of the testator for fifteen' years, out of the principal. It was contended, on the part of the legatee, that under these circumstances, the wait )1' WAS bonnd to pay the legacy oot of hisown funds. Sir JOHN Nrcnot.s. directed an Inventory and account to be produced to verify the fact. The Court then proceeded to try prerogative causes. HANNAN AND BOOTH AGAINST HURD._ This was a suit to determine the 'validity of certain instruments, propounded as testamentary papers of Mrs. Frances St. Leger. widow of Gen. Barry St. Leger, who, about 30 years back, commanded in Canada. He had cbi babited with the testatrix,who was orignally a barmaid at Worksop, in Nottinghamshire, for about twenty years previous to his marriage with her, which took place shortly before his death, in 1795. and upon which occa sion, according to the evidence,he was carried to church, having been paralytic some time before. Some ehil• dren were born before marriage, but none after. An died previous to the death of the testatrix, and that of her husband. One grandchild was living, the daughter of J. Lindley St. Leger. the son of the testatrix. 'this granddaughter married, contrary to the wishes of the testatrix, Mr. Humphrey Beardshaw. The testatrix was a 'name of eccentric habits. She bad contracted a _boldness for low society and indulgencies, and was ac claimed to use very foul and offensive language; she lavished her money in the most extravagant manner, and was subject to occasional fits of derangement. especially when her dividends were paid, in January and July. In , March, 1821, a commission de lunatic* ixfuireado was s•- , 5d out against her on the petition of Mr. Beardshaw rod Elisabeth his wife; and in the following month she was found by a Jury lunatic, with lucid intervals. Mr. )I^artitsltaw was nominated committee alter person, and Afr F.sll o- . of he; estate. The testatrix had been fond rf will-making. Several wells, canceled and un.- celled, were extant. In April, IWO, she bad Made a Will, the depositiiins of which were favourable Ass Mrs. IkleArashaw. In April, 1821, about tie period when the inquisition was taking place, she made another will, en tirely altering therein the dispos'tion of her property, leaving the bulk of it to her husband's collateral rein ' to whom :he was very partial, calling Sir Dudley St. Leger Hill her " hero." She said that it was but just that the property should go to her husband's family, as-" all came from him." The testatrix was represented to be much exasperated at the act of the Beardshaws in taking out a commission of lunacy, and threatened them with the consequences. In May, 1823, however, she executed 'bother will in her own handwriting, whereiii she made anew disposition of her property in favour of Mr. aod.Mrs. Beardshaw. It began with a profession tent she now belie/red that her granddaughter had aspi properly in what she did ; and, in the prayer-book Ame the paper was found, the deceased had written, " spay read this when I am at peace and asleep with my dear friends gone before me to rest." The property left by the deceased was 6,0001. personally, and a tree. bold estate worth 8001. The Court had to decide, who. they the will of 1820, that of 1821, or that of 1823, was valid ?or whether probate should-be granted to the first and last conjointly'? Dr. Juneau and Dr. Lassratworon, on behalf of the executors appointed under the wills of 1820 and 182$, contended, that as it was admitted the deceased was in sane, with lucid intervals, from the beginning of 1821 till the finding ef. the Jury, which took place in the period of givinginstruatiress for the will of 1821, it wins the duty of those who set . " w lucid inter's' tOsa o -1 blish it as clearly as-the orarnal . fierangement was esti blished. The circumstances a ttending the prepaeition and execution of the will of 1821, pruved - justAtt con trary. Again, if the will of 1821 was not impeached, what was to impeach that of 1823? Thelatter was a recognition of the return of that affection towards the granddaughter which had prompted the will of 1820. D - . Daimon and JESSE ADDAMS, on behalf of the executor under the will of 1821, contended that all the , circumstances chewed that will to hue been executed! during a lucid interval. An attempt had been made to connect the will with a commission of lunacy ; but it was supported by evidence which shewed, on the contrary, that the deceased intended to alter her *Mot 1820, before she knew of the commission, but was pa -1 vented by the refusal of the party in whose custody it was to let her have it. Two of the Jury had sworn that she conducted herself calmly and rationally at the in quisition, and that the verdict was founded upon past occurrences. If the deceased was not sane in 1821,she was not in 1820, and this would then be a question of intestacy; and if the will of 1821 was not pronounced for, the real estate would not be disposed of. Sir JOHN Meant. said, unless further consideration induced him to change his opinion, he should not trou ble the other side to reply. If the parties, however, agreed before next Court 'day to take probate of the will of 1820, he should not think it necessary to state his reasons at length. • INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, JULY 7. Wainer Wheatley was opposed by •MT. }ISATIS. on behalf of Mr. St ckdale, the bookseller. • It appeared in evidence, that, in the latter part of last year, the insolvent was confined in Dorchester Gaol, upon a charge of forgery, from whence he was removed by Habeas Corpus to Newgate, to take his trial at the Old Bailey, where he was acquitted of the criminal charge, but was detained on the civil action brought by Mr. Suickdale, of whom he purchased, a large quantity of expensive books. The insolvent said, that he had beeka constant fre quenter of the most celebrated watering-places. At other times, it appeared that he bad been hying in seclu sion on the Continent. To a question by Mr. MATH, the insolvent said, that he could not tell how many times he had compromised with parties to prevent criminal prosecutions. Upon further inquiry, st turned out that the insolvent had con sidered himself last year entitled to a freehold, near Worksop, no mention of which had been made in the schedule. The insolvent said, that he had since been told that his mother had given it to his nephew. Wheatley was remanded for the 3d time, that he might produce evidence relative to the freehold in question. Edward Cary, a young man of fashionable appear. ance, and of a highly respectable family, was brought up for a final heating. At his original examination - he was opposed by Counsel nn behalf of several hotel and livery stable keepers, living at Melton Mowbray, where the insolvent bad figured with ten hunters and five ser vants. He said, that being the favourite son of his father, he was allowed money whenever he applied for it; he never had in little as 1,0001. since he was 17 years old. Mr. Commissioner MMUS said, that however ex travagant the insolvent might have been, there had been no act of fraud committed ; and it should be remarked, that he had paid a great deal of money to some of the opponents, who were well aware of his mode of living, and his dependence upon his father for supplies to sup. port the expensive mode of life he had pursued. Al. though the Court would not remand the insolvent, it was right for him to be told, that kis future property would be liable, to the payment., of bis debts. After making some further remarks upon the case, the Com. mission= ordered him to be discharged forthwith. JuDomatiT.—Joseph Thompson, a publican and tailor, of Leeds, was sentenced to be confined within the walls' of the prison for ten calendar months, for fraudulently making away with his property, and putting his creditor to expense by setting up a vexatious defence to as action. LONDON DOCK COSIPANT. Friday, a very nu merous Meeting of the Proprietors of Shares in the London Dock Company was held at the Office, in 'Prince street, near the Bank, for the purpose of receiv. I ing a statement of the income and expenditure of the Company for the last half-year. ISAAC SWAT. Esq. in the Chair. The Minutes of the last Meeting were read, which skewed that a balance of 22,0961. 14s. 9d. re mained to the credit of the Company at the end of the half.yeat in December. The Dock Expenditure imou nt e o 6,0791. 10s. 2d.; repairs to 4 5901.45. 4d.; salaries to 9,6681. 12s. 4d.; wages to 26,7031. 6s. -law expenses 2501.; which, with other items, made a total of 56,9481. Is. sd. On the credit side there appeared—. Balance brought from last half-year, 22,0961. 14s. 9d.; Dock Returns 111,2751.175. 4d.; premises leased to the Customs 1,3061. 4s. 3d.; rents of estates, 3791.104.5 d.; Exchequer Bills, with Interest, 2831. Os. I Id.; which, with other items of re►enue, made a total of 129,6421. 13s. Id. The outstanding claims on the Company to the 31st May were 103,6841. Ot. 4d. A dividend Of 21.55. per cent. for the half year ending the 30th June, was agreed to. POLICE INtELLICEIIOE.: • MANSION-110(AL Saarila, km" fillemeru, an aged me, father atilt ik; y SelP miss after whom the police officers have been some time in pursuit, mabrought ham the Lome Maros soda the feilooks circuits sums I.—When it was known that limy Solomon Lad etesped he the Newgite-keepers, Mr. Cope. accompanied by some of the Mk** Ahem went to wards all the places where they thought k losable the fugitive might be concealed.* It has been a FrOlise with Miowiptilbieves of late to bide, when they know they mom wanted," lo the my 'pots where a person would sot think of M fee theasktimety. is their own or is their rehitione hems. their west OmM isiessons' house, 54, Gravel-tine, Hounds. dltds mildieolthaliel to ransack ever) , part of the habitation. He saw We perms is Is hears except Ikey's mother, who said that the knew ending abbot the matter at aIL Upon looking over the pro. in the Mae, be found a number of gold and sliver den, end Viet Nikko of cossack-table value. He immediately took them M the limano Moose, and the Lose Maros ordered that day &sold be advertised, and that there should be a look-out slier add Soleasone. Friday, the prisoner was taken into custody as the west end of the town ; and es them appeared an owner tot the watches, an era. ciliation took place on Saturday. Mr. George Grant stated, that be lived at No. 1. Wilberovgli street, and that he bad • sleep in Cloneera-lane to the sale of watches, atc. He was in the habit of leaving the shop at. about har pist nine o'clock at night, and he returned to Malaise nest morning at nine, (lo the 24th of May he left his shop at the usual hour in a complete state of security as he thought. Ilse Loan blares asked the prosecutor whether he bad left say body behind him to take sue of the shop? The persecutor replied in the negative. He had fastened all the windows asddoors, and be did not think it possible for any one to get in without the key. When, however, be pent next morning to business, be found that the next home, which was empty. bad been brakes into by thieves, and tilt they had cut away a panel in the patty wall, which was made of wood, and got ions his shop, and removed every thing they could lay beads upon. Upon seeing the advertisement in the newspapers, be watt to see the articles, and foood that almost all the property he bad lost was in the poesemius of Mr. Cairse. Mr. Cope stated that be found the six gold watches and eleven silver watches in the bane of the prisoner on the day alter the robbery. The Liao Maven ash . ed the prisoner whether be wished to say anything?—Soiontoss said that he would leave his defence to his Solicitor. The Solicitor dashed him not to say anything. Thee: mold ley, he added, a complete answer to the charges at the Oiri=l Upon the person of the primer were found a watch, Pt) o and 45 duplicates of the dates of I al! and 182/.--Tbe Omar was fully committed for triaL Lyon Lyons was Charged with having received a quantity of booof . cloth, the property of Mr. Waller. Other articles which issl boos, stolen were also found as the premises of the prisusset. the property being identified, the prisoner was committed Saida Lie had previously borne a most eiselleet character. The Loan MAYOR, incidentally, in the course of thole munino tion, expressed kis astonishment at the istraerdinary cod oct of men of business, when notwithstanding the daily orearreme of rob beries. left the most valuable property merely under lock and- bey in uninhabited houses. Complaints bad been made to bins -*Feral . times of the inactivity of the police officers, by persons who-shams bad been robbed,bat he found, that whenever he asked under whose care the homes were which had been broken open, he was sob [artily told—ander nobody's. • HATTON-G ARDEN. Base Cont.--A young man named Fits:Way, and known as a I' pal" of George Wainer, one of the unfortunate nun who were executed co Friday morni ng. was reexamined, oar a charges( being a common utterer of base coin. The prisoner had passed one bad half crown. and attempted a second, at the am of a poor man, named Manning, liviog in Ray-street. Cleriemswell, but was for tunately detectecLand gives into custody. Both pieces of coin were produced, and proommeed counts:fat by Mr.lowell, juts. who at tended en the past of the Mist . Other could have been brought against him, but were not pressed, and he Mf folly com mitted far trial en this charge. A diminutive being, calking Mimi( Merits Mertes, was :ft. examined on sospicitio of being concerned ins highway robbery on Wednesday night, amongst some new buildings at the end of Gray's lon-road, on which oosasion Mr. Hedge, the proprietor ease Blue Post Tavern. Southimplan-buildings. Holborn, and a friend, wore deprived of Melt watches, and se dreadfully beaten, that they could not &Mud on the following day. The prisoner was found lurking near the spot, and althoughpo traces of the property could be' dia. .covered, yet being known as a reputed thief, be was ordered by Ma. I,,auto to six weeks hard Sims In ths.Nkome.of Cocrictios. MARLBOROUGU.STRART. parade Getman 'wing. omen whs. the - the streets of the mamagallestil~he pahlic to boy a broom," were brought to this elite taisy,charged by sae of the oM. cm of the Menditty Socieiy with begging la the meet. They gave their names Elisabeth Ceiderem, Mary Pleherta, ape Mar. r prat Pickerin. The officer stated that be found them tinging aWM in the vicinity of the office, and soliciting alms of the persons passing. They bad ao brooms to sell. The poor girls were much distressed upon being placed at the bar, and shed tears most copiously. A German Gentleman who accidentally saw them brought to the office, came forward, and, through his assistance the Magistrate was enabled to communicate with the girls, not we of whom nu. derstood a word of English. The Gentleman sated that the girlie came wool the vicinity of Frankfort, and were usually employed la vending small brooms; but in consequence of the stock of wood from which the brooms are made behigsthausted, they had mole to sell, and their " mature" had sent them out to slog for a few days until their stock of brooms should be replenished. The Magistrate, Mr. Drill, asked who this master was, and where be lived ? All that could be obtained from the girls was that he lived In Whltechapel ; but the name of the strew they could not tell. To other questions put by the Magistrate, they stated that the man they called their master had Induced these to come to this country. That there.were at the peewit time about thirty of these female venders of brooms about town, who were all utmler.the sub jection of the man who resides in Whitechapel. He supplied them with brooms, and received all their earnings; for which be was to allow them their victuals, lodging. and halt a florin, shoat teat:ince, each, per week. Mr. Dud inquired of what their food coosisted? The answer was, that they had coffee and bread of a morning and crating. and got what they could daring the day. Villen they had no money they went without. Foe the edging of the three girls the man paid 4s per week. Mr. fires--I really hardly know bow to act in this cam. I =s not reconcile It to my feelings to commit these poor innocent girls. who have been compelled to commit an as of by a man whit appears to be shamefully flying epos the subsets of their labour. If I discharge them, they have no other alternative titait tomtit* the same Wane. This mat'. madam has produced a rib& ad. ante, and I think the Mendicity &clay would do well by making masednquiry after him. The officer of the Mendicity Society promised that the Magi.. crate's suggestion should be attended to. The girls were allowed to depart, upon their promise to come forward on a future day to give evidence against their master. The countenances of the girls new began to brighten, and a Goa: &man In the office presented them with a small sum of money, and they left the office in much better spirits than they entered it. WO ItSll IP.STREET. Ass Urn.ocee Tinir.—Two lads. timed Boyd sad Arrow, were brought ►efore the Magistrate, by Thee. West, a constable, charged with attempting to pick pocket" It appeared that *a Friday evening the officer observed the pri soner Boyd actively engaged in sounding the pockets of the lieges on their way along the Mile cod read, from tied so Fairlop fair. In this =sneer he had been seen to thrust his hand into sis or seven pockets, and at length, in an unlucky moment, he actually thrust it into the Awls waistcoat pocket, which (acorn of evil I) contained a pair of steel ems, or handcuffs. He was stopped in his weer, and the handcuffs be had se unwittingly stum►led ea, were fitted on his own waists. Boyd was committed to the Bern of Correction for two months. Brown, who had merely been observed in company with the ocher, was discharged, with a serious adnwitisa from the Magistrate. Thaw Norton, charged with being one of the gang who robbed Surma Fuller, on the 11th of September, was folly committed,' betemeimed to be brought up again to have the depositions taken; and there is another charge against him also, of robbing Captain, Molloy, of the Trinity Almshouses. QUASI or STAIIMIL—RaIeces Mat was brought from the Spitalfaelds watchbouse en a charge of stabil* a ming womeis whose as.,. did net appear. The female who had been injured Fes not able to attend, and was lying at the Leaden Hospital la dangerous state. Several witnesses were remised, and from what maid be its 4 lected from them, it appcsred that the prisoner entertained a jealous suspicion of her husband and the other woman ; sod, for a very comidetable tim e , the two females, both highly Inflamed with liquor, continued quarrelliis and llglithig 4 being egemeeroly separated by neighbours, end as fatten renewing the *waiter wit, the moat . crate determination, until at leogthc aftet their list enr.einter, the woinuled female exclaimed to One of du wit nesses. named Am B. own, 't Oh! Ann, I am nabbed!" Rai immediately fell dnwh. A than, who, in the midst at the kg bad dragged the prisoner away from her opponent, to present their Sahebs),. any lager, described the maAner in which they were beating and tearing each other is tsar shocking to behula. They wens both covered Oith blood 1,, bet When the witness after. wards found the patient on the grimed, and Wouoded, she was bleeding like a (*amain. It did not appear that any of the wit. oases had actually seen the wound infficte4. The prisoner herself had evidently suffered severely. lye 4 e „ was ocgatchodand torn, and exhibited brulasti Whirls might r at t le have beau empected to have resulted from a contest between two pris e lighters, than to have been hi/heted by the tuts of one of the eater sex. Sbe was remanded for the present. The Omit siren shocked and astonished by the following examl. nation of Ann Holderitcb, who stated that she /ended with brf mother next door to the pritonv..a. Baoummen--kiew old are yen? Sitteen.—Can fe e T .,, 1 No !.....Were you ever at Church? No!--Nor Chapel? NJ:..e Do you kip* the danger of an oath ? No!—Are you aware t', I if you perjure yourself, you will be pun shed hereafter? Not—LUC you know elute Ss a Gun? No!—Does your mother go, or ev., take you. to. Church? No!—How is she employed on Suatda). , She works when she can get it. The Magistrate here turned round, and inquired whether three was not a Ciergymasi who visited Dillon's court (the tesitlents of the party)? aped was answered that them was no one but a Ewe( preacher. He then said it was incumbent on the parish author:tier to represent the Court. DIVIDENDS to Demo& in BASING HALL.STREET. July el, Thomas Gibbon and David gems Meramontatreet, an e ndeapero, at sen. Aug. 3, Meese Thompson, Waltham Holy C ros s, gun, cool entrant, at one. Judy at, Marks Man, Nine Elms public-house, Bahama, Surrey, IlentaOrr, at twelve. Jay 31, jaliwi hily CmisleY' 27, Jam l e j s il Lotli kli-essit' , Northa Ola mpnig ereed. d itir rap n e ' r, aledumli at at eleven. July 27,William Campos, Holiness-street, Panssaawierate, grocer, at two. July 20, John Blown*, Canterbury, Kent, lioendraper, at eleven. July 27, John Abel Chariesworth, Fencliorch Build. logs, tea broker, at one. July 17, Wiliam Henry nyder, Noitou Feline, tailor, at ten July 27, John Ilan, Canterbury, busier, at ten. Jo)) 17, Wftliant Chapman, St. Hems, liontiegdoesbiee, currier, at eleven. Jul/ It, Wißlana Blondes, sea. late of Rut MaMng, Kent, and of Bast PeCkbilal farmer, at tea. July ay. Joseph Hibbert, Hylortre.nort, C ro tched-friar', wise metetani, at eleven. July 27, Nathaniel Rogers Hewitt, Buckintham.place, Fitsroy.opare, and of Pordand.terrace Regent's Palk, engrave?, at eleven. July 27, Thomas Roddei"forth, late of St. Paul's Citurtiard, eternaker, at eleven. July 31 , John Makin, now or late Rederomment, rectifier, at ten. July 27. John Walker, late of Manley-bowie, Kennington Comma, Surrey, schoolmaster, at two. July 31, John Neale and &meat Warner, Milk.itreee, limendrapers, at ten. July 31, James Walker, Upper Mohamed ? Bermondsey, Surrey, at tau DIVIDENDS to Derma, In the COUNTRY. Aug. I, Kirk Munsear, late of Pattern-lane, Buekleribory, warehouseman, at ten. at the Wellinv oh Bridge Inn. Stockport, Cheshire. at amen. Aug.), William Chemberlayne, Leamington Priors, Warwickshin, victualler. at eleven, at the Crown Hotel, Leantington Priors. Aug. 7 ? Samuel Wood, Manchester, ma. awn ' at tethit White's Hotel, King -street, Manchester. Aug. John Peaky, emu and John Pocky, jun. nubile, Lancashire, cat. ton spinner, at two, at the Star Inn, Manchester. July 30, nos. Loud ' now or late of Dover, Kent, corn dealer, at ten. July so, John Harris, Modbury, Devonshire, lioendrapsr, at eleven, at the Globe Hotel. Exeter. .1111 as, William Brett sal Junes tidal, Buralem, Staffordshire, grocers, at eleven, as the Linktin's Aran Penkridge, Staffordabire. July 31, William Waters tal Thomas Charles Waters, Behest, Ironmongers, at two, at tie Rummer Tavern, AB SeinaNane, Bristol. July 27. WAS Tomlin's" Nei/twirls, Cheshire, money scrivener, at Whit the Crown Inn, N antwicb . July 27, Thomas Garnett, Mastwidi, Cheshire cheese factor at tan, at the Crown lan , Mantua July 47. tilithadol Fr ench, )ail. Cardiff, Glamorganskire, liner draper, at one, at the Canineridal Roams. Bristol. July Sy Samuel Morris, Claelteoliam, Gloucestershke builder, at two, the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham. July Si, Joh n Close, sen. Down Close. and Solomon Reinhold, Manchester, m e rchants, at ten, a Whites Houk Manchester. Aug. is, Richard Brooke, Wskot, Sonservetshire, amnion brewer, at one, at the Whew Hart Lei, Bath. Aug. 6, Robert Wilson, Tenggara Green, Chlivrick, drape, as two, at the White Bear Inn, Piccadilly. CR RT IF IC ATES.—ionx 27. Christopher Bartlett, late of Plymouth, Devonshire, shipowner. Nathaniel Walbauk, Keighley, Yorisbire, worsted spinner. 'Thos. Lane, jun. Upton-upon-Sever h Wnrcesterskire, cum dealer. Rkbard Berman, Sanctum, Warwickshire, money scrivener. John Harding Gibbs, Chiewelletreet, Finsbury-square, oil mod coleurman. Thomas Land, Leeds, Yorkshire, flax spinners. Subs. Cloister, Bedminster, Somersetabire currier. John Mon, late of ToithUl.atreet, Westminoter..ehoen:aker. John Eccles, Welker. bury, Staffordshire, victualler. Samuel Morris, Cloehenbarr, Gloucestershire, builder. Chow Benson. late of Bowling greys. . Kenninvon. Surrey, builder. William Gore Saloon 1,,d Hest yTwiasietan Elliman, Leamington, Warwickshire, booksellers.. _ PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. Unitas Wibon, Thomas Hallehursr, and Robert Hedky, Ea. corn, Cheshire, school slate manufacturers. John Huntington and J. •Bmith, Barnsley, Yorkshire, carpenters. Thomas Atkinson al George Jarmo, Chatham druggists. Robert Gkadnw and Wm. Swatter, Kingwon-upon- Hull. ironmongers John Brown and William PiSing, Bolson.lm Moors, and at Manchester, cotton ad:. milacinrers. Edwin Smith and Josh. Wm. Moore, L eeds, Yolk• shire, attorneys. Chutes Haag and Thomas Edmund Weiler, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, bookseller.. Caroline Horsfall and Anne Worthington, Herne, near Manchester. Cohn Musa, Joseph Adams, Malcom Maaraughton, and 'Cardin Idaensughtoot London and Glasgow. Edmund . Wrigley and Joseph Knowl, liaddleworth, Yorkshire, merchants. Benjamin Pietism Thomas Davenport, Jonah Harris, Denby, Derbyshire, cud war. chants. W. Ashman and William Hayden'. Joseph Canalised Michael Turner, Bled og j hana, silver-platers. John Thosamw , John Cottinglim, and John T. Thompson, Liverpool, Lanculdre, rope owoolactsroro. Asia Scott, John Alezander, Charles Alen. ander, and Jtaskinsan Duelarorth,Gibraltar, conardsion Wareham John Jima NW and Co. Glasgow, and Wa. Lamb mad Co. ik Tbmers, sassalmoss. Mint* &Masao and William Sc'. Ohnkar, surdissab Thomas Grawkaos, F. H. Hrsadrsa. W.C. Demikam. and Harry Lawslitoo, illse-lane, merchants. P. Maims, Na. WI U. lionnseseLiverposi, merchants. T. 1. Parks soda Tlemlws, 1111rodogliars, Warwleksigre i waxy scriveners. I. Willi Job litimazil a issae Stamper , Liverpool , ilabebaraws. lababotk Legg mid Legg, Southampton, primers. pm Mather, Sansei Parkas, ohs Daniel namely, and Tamen Mather, jun. LiverpooL Joseph Ramsay and Waiter B. Andrei% Cateatosiatreet, Backwell.halWactora. General Weekly Avenge et the Ma et BMA gem erbiel governs Importation, made np no *elf& other Moat SOL I 74. Oita 224. 114. Beam 10d. Barley 42& lid. Rye 4435. 34. I Pew gas, 01 MARRIED. At C.c.llunteott, the Rev. Robot Allen. Rel.. Maw her College, and Rector of Baresusbe, somas, to Mary, cfflly daughter of the late George Ilidatnr. The Rem W. IL Hooey, Fellow of liken College. and Rector of Daveratock, in the county of Wilts, to Margaret, Immtel g daughter of the late Rev. Nicholas Earle, Rector of Seaford. .oxfocdohlre. DIED. At his seat at Langley Park. in Norfolk, on the 29th ult. Sir Thomas Beauchamp Proctor, Bart. In the 'list pare( his ar• At Roesiand of Erskine, ea the 31st ult. Ir. Wm Furnace. surgeon. Mr. Forrester had recently, before his death, receiv ed 'an appointment in the Honourable the East India Company i rtel vice as Assistant Surgeon. M 4111.8.-1 •IL Jr?. ▪ 0 2 0 • 0 0 • 0 O 0 O 0 O 1, 'HIS DAL Dublin Waterfard Marring, and Jersey Lisbon Donagbadee IBesoos Ayres Holland Truce Hamburg Flandcrs Swedes Met[co Leeward Wands Jamaica As& 108 ' 1 0 O 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 O 0 O 1 111011-WATIM at LONDON-1311,IDGE TO 1IOKROR• Mcrli 15 Wm** OW 3 OW 3 31 lIIISUttI Unman: Prime and Pubnaked by JM IN )Jaya, the I"Frig"4 at tat kV Orrick Nu. 1, rickettlbea, Trnpledikr• I _t --- J 1 . .4 • ~ r fki W ths tosick6l ~~ VON Author - Raw Dm i _ Ras' it him Nam& CARPI LOOt CARV: FUNEI &LC chink luta, 131. Ni ciPal bl Dann Nava tad at N.l ...-- 'Ab4 AI ~. •litit Otto Ohm, Met