Star. — London, England, 1827-06-12 00:00:00

N to worthamptimadr.; Yr.)lC~ limington . Ha. gintstakik imill by ?dr. inns, from the City of CM , cheerer, and other pines is &nen ; and by Mr. Home. ten of the County of Chester. . a ll:r e :e t : d ee an of A is e i c e ou r not a t s ea the ' lira . oast de o r f: d ion to ej e - - . - LOMA II CATHOLICS. Lord J. RUSSELL presented a Petition praying for emancipa. dam s from the Roman Catholics of the Midland Counties of Eng land. It was signed, he said, by several Catholic Noblemen. The Petitioners dotted that the seise degree of toleration for which they prayed albs& be extended to ail religious acts.—The Noble Lord, at the same time, presented three Petitions BodiesW Mounters against the Test end Corporation Acts.— Ordered to be printed. Lord JOHN RUSSELL postponed till to-morrow etennight his motion for a Bill to enable Manchester to return two Mem• ben to Parlistnesst Mr. HUME presented a Petition from Arbroath, in favour of the Salmon Fishery Bill. An Hon. 111131bilt, presented several Petitions against the Test and Corporation Acts from the Dissenters residing in The counties of Rutland and Leicester. Mr. BROUGHAM presented similar Petitions from Oldham, Kendal, Milford. Bolton, Bradford, and various other places, from the Roman Catholics of the parish of Ballyknock, in favour of Emancipation; and from Mr. Benjamin Keane, of the Middle Temple, complaining of the exaction of money in France from British subjects on applying for passports. Mr. BROUGHAM also presented a Petition from certain Ro man Catholics in the County of Waterford, complaining of a false and tloellova publication which appeared its the Thaw Newspaper of the 6th of March last, and purporting to be a speech delivered in that House. The Petitioners stated that they were the tenants of the Marquis of Watetford, and were represented in 'the said publication to have been forced, in consequence of the threats of their Clergy, to vote for Mr. Villiers Stuart, against their coo science, and in opposition to promises previously given. . Mr. CANNING said he did not think the Petition could be re ceived. As it did not complain of a breach of privilege, it mast, he conceived, be looked upon as containing a covert allusion to the proceedings of that House. Mr. BROUGHAM said be was disposed to coincide in the ob servations of the Right Hon. Gentleman. He should, therefore, withdraw the Psoition.—lt was withdrawn accordingly. Petitions were presented praying a repeal of the Test and COI'. potation Acts, by Mr. 8110Ucklialt from Chester-le-Stsvet; by Sir T. D. Attain, from a place in Devonshire; and by Lord HOW3Clr e from Ainwick and eighteen other places in Northumberland. Mr. BILOVOIIaIe presented a Petition from the Shipmaster* and Mechanics of the Town of Wexford, praying that there may be no distinction made in the Education of the Poor on account of cell.' gloss diferences.—Ordered to be printed. Also a Petition from the Roman Catholics of Care, in Ireland, la favour of Cathode Emancipation. Also a Pecking' from certain Attorneys of Newcastle, complain ts( of the delays and expenses in the Court of Chancery. Also a Petition from G. H. Hayes, an Attorney, at Cambridge, upon the subject of the Banitrupt Laws. The Petitions were ordered to be printed. eorrt.r. Upon the motion of Mr. Haase% Sir A. GRANT brought ttp the itt of the Committee' of Supply. r i pi t a the Resolution for the Grant on account of Portugal, Mr. HUME said that be had abandoned his intention of pro toads( whist the Resolution; which was then agreed to. WATS AID 111/ANS. Mr. HERRLES moved the receiving of the Report of the Cows mktee of Ways and Means.—Upon the first Resolution being put, Mr. HUME asked when the Finance Committee would be appointed? It was the practice to have the Estimates prepared about the 15th of February. and if Parliament assembled at the usual late period. tbe Com mittee would not have time to enquire and recommend such reductions as were necessary. Retrenchments bad been recommended by former Committees, and the effect of the one now promised would only be to delay still further what had been long ago necessary. He wish ed to ask whether the Parliament would be assembled at, the usual time? and if so, whether no reductions were to be made until the Finance Committee had reported? He recollected to Rt. Hon. G.ntleman to have said upon a former occasion, when be proposed to refer the Esti mates to a Committee of the House, that when the Etecutive Government found it necessary to call in the House of Commons to prepare the Estimates fat 'be service of the Country, they were not entitled to much confidence from the country. He began to see that there was much truth in what the Right Hon. Gentleman said, and that this calling of the }louse to Council wad a departure from the usual practice, and rather an injury than a benefit to the country. Mr. CANNING said he was sure the House would see that it was impossible for him to answer the whole of the Hon. Gentleman's question, a part of which was of an unprecedented and unheard of character. As to When the Ministers of the Crown should advise his Majesty to assemble Parliarnent in the ensuing year, that was a question which, he would undertake to say, no Minister had ever been called on to answer before. But if he objected to that part of the question, Were was another sense in which be thought the Hon. Gentleman would be satisfied with the answer he should give. The Hon. Gentleman seemed to think that because a Committee was to be appointed, nothing would be done in the way of reduction by the Govern ment before that Committee should have reported to Ise. He begged to say that that was not the 'rom the moment when the present Govern ;ame formed, their attention had been directed taining and carrying into effect whatever re ' might be found practicable—(Hear, hear). ' that upoa the balance, although he had re answer the first part of it, the Hon. Gentle- Id be satisfied with the result of his question. ME expressed his satisfaction at the litigbe Heneseele '1 answer. Resolutions were agreed to, and 'rah oedered to be brought 4 thereon. It Bill went through a Committee, and the Report was be received, and to be taken into further consideration Thursday next. Houle went into Committee on the Game Certificates Acts. HERR I ES explained that the object of the meaner. IILAS canna having game certificates should be enabled to use England and Ireland without distinction, paying the addi v in England. was brought in, founded on the Resolution of as DEHOUSE moved the receiving the Report of the Presentment BiU. Report was received and the Bill ordered to be read a third . 1 that becaut 1 would be d anent befor i ... the House. case. ' Fro! • 1 ! anent becar to aseettair i 'il eluctidns m 1 . . I I. il !1 I I , ' lit hoped I fused to at man would Mr. HUM dentiontan's i The Remit in founded th, The Malt I ordered to be on Thursday 1 • The House me. HER that persons t them in Engt tional duty in A Bill wa Committee. Mr. WOE Constables' I . / i l l llse Repos lii :. • time to-nows ; 1 1 On the m read for the I East Raton Mr. TEI last electic and Sir I wined, bu turn, whicl 'slitter rep! Kr. Wrigh Committee i - they set fa prevailed i Thm state been the ci 4 # . for the suc of them. • • in case the 1 borough in ' ; the expedie tt atiaghava, 1, .' '' . :: , N 'At.. . , . 1.. t .. 4 •;... , .„. EAST RETIORD KLEcriow. maim of Mr. Witness, the Order of the Day wu .r the consideration of the Report of the Committee on the Rettoril Riecdon. 'ENNYSON stated, that the candidates at the lion were Sir Robert Dundas, Mr. Wrightson, Henry Wilson. The two former were re tut a petition was presented against their re tch was referred to a Committee. The Com- Totted that the election of Sir R. Dundas and Ights(Sn was void on account of treating. The rime likewise made a special report, in which ` forth the gross and notorious corruption which ' at the election of members for Retford.— s red, amongst other things, that it had long 1 constant practice for every elector who voted successful candidates to receive 201. from each • The Hon. Gentleman, after intimating that the elective franchise should be taken from the in question, he should press upon the House, liency,of transferring it to the town of Bir sgt down by moving asoßesolution," That , the corrupt state of the boioogh of East Retford de. faired the settees consideration of Parliatneht." Mr. FrAGUSSON was ready to support the motion for ibrill7, lint did not think the evidence already be fore the House sufficient to warrant the disfranchise ment of Os borough. He thought, too, the electors of East ltetford had 1 right to be heard in their defence. Mt. Alderman WAITHMAN thought the evidence before the House quite sufficient, not only to warrant the disfranchisement of East. Rettord, but to call upon ^the /lonic imperatively to adopt that measure. The whole country was indebted to the Hou. Member near him (Mrjennysoal for his motion. Mr. WYNN thought not only that a full case was mode gat for inquiry, but that the evidence before the House Gas sufficient to carry a sentence of disfranchise ment, if the electors of East Rettord did not clearly contradict it. Mr. D. BARCLAY suoptword the motion. Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH thought that a clear case was made out for disfranchisement, unless the evi- dence was to be most materially altered. Mr. P. THOMSON and. Lord JOHN Russap. expressed their full concurrence in the resolution, which was then put, and agreed to without a division. Mr. TENNYSON moved for leave to bring in a Bill to take away from the borough of East Retford the power of returning two burgesses to serve in Parlia ment, and to transfer the power of electing two burgesses to the inhabitants of Birmingham in lieu thereof. Mr. GOULBURN would not oppose the motion, but did not feel himself pledged either to the admission of. a sufficient case of corruption; or to the Mode of deal ing with it should it be made out ; or to the place se lected to send members instead of it, if the botoogh should be disfranchised. _ _ _ ...--. Sir C. WETHERELL would not be pledged to the' admission of any fact or principle involved in the ul tetior proceedings on the Bill, the bringing in of which' , he could not oppose. He objected to the doctrine which had been broached, however, that having dis covered some corruption and mal-practices, the House was at liberty to infer a great deal more. The onus of proof lay here, as in the case of an individual who was accused, upon the accuser ; and the House was not at liberty to proceed to the deprivation of so valuable a right, without giving the parties the whole of the be nefits which were due to persons charged with an offence of the most serious kind. Mr. FERGUSSON said, that the forms of proceed. ing on the Bill would give ample opportunities of de fence to the parties accused. He thought that their jurisdiction must be always lame and imperfect, unless they could obtain that power of vindicating their pri vileges, by administering oaths according to the Bill brought in by his Noble Friend (Lord J. Russell), and thrown out in the Session of the last Parliament. He did not, however, believe that there would be any de ficiency of proof from the want of that power, because the truth must necessarily be elicited by the examina tion of the witnesses by so many parties viewing it in so many different points of view. Mr. W. SMITH complained of that perversion of constitutional doctrine which required the same nicety, in establishing the line of evidence in a case of elec-1 tioneesing corruption and in the case of a ctiminal ac-. 1 cased for a breach of the laws. What comparison could there be between the crime and punishment of an indi vidual offender against the law, and the disfranchise ment of a borough on account of corruption and bribery ? The offence and punishment of a pr ate man con cerned himself; but a public body held it. privileges as a trust to be used beneficially for the public, and in taking them away for abusing them to interested and corrupt purposes, the public did not injure any one.— These electors were entitled to very little of their sym pathy; for if the respectable part of them found that the election was carried by corrupt practices in favour of persons wholly unfit to represent them, they should , have petitioned Parliament themselves to correct such practices; &stead of which they had suffered it to pre wail for a long course of time, without taking any nonce of them. Mr. CHARLES ROSS said, that if it was an affair of the gravest importance to bestow the right of ♦oting upon a place which had it not before, it could not be of less importance to take it away from one which now possessed it. Even if the case of corruption should be proved, he did nor see why the Hoof should depart, in punishing it, from that practice which bad always pre vailed, except in one only case. Mr. O'NEIL objected to this too rapid progress of reform—{Laughter from some of the benches). He' thought that-these forced marches would prove counter , marches. He would oppose the Bill in all its stages, as he had done that of Penryn ; and for the same reasons he had resisted " the march of intellect" in the Co. vents y Bill. Sir C. FORBES objected to the proceeding, on the grounds which he had once before submitted to the House. He did not know what was meant by Parlia mentary Reform ; but if it was meant that Members should be returned entirely by pure and unbought votes, that House would be constituted by a very different set of men from those which it now contained, and large bodies of the people would be entirely unrepre sented. He contended that the man who paid his own money for his seat was the most truly independent, because he was not bound to vote on particular occasions for or against Ministers. What independence could there be in one who sat for a Government borough, after signing a paper in which he had bound himself, not only to accept, but to apply for the Chiltern Hun dreds? What independence could there be in those who sat for boroughs the property of Peers, as some friends of his did, being bound to vacate their seats in case they differed, however con cientiously, from their patrons on particular questions? He had heard of a plan proposed by Mr. Pitt to Mr. Fox, to begin with his own side of the house, and strike out alternately the worst of their boroughs, transferring the right to more populous places, and that Mr. Fox refused. He had been on the Committee of the Helston election, in 1813. There was one of the clearest and m Ist decided cases of cor. ruptiottproved that any Gentleman could desire to hear of. (Laughter.) It was proved, that the Duke of Leeds had disbursed 1,5001. emong the electors, having one seat already in his gift. He himself was for shewing up the Duke before the House, but was told of the great scandal of treating a Peer of the realm in so unceremd nious a manner. He had said, that the punishment of a rogue in fillies was worth ten in rags. (Laughter.) Now what was the consequence ? Why none at all. Helston ought to have been treated like Penryn ; and as to the Duke, what was sauce for the goose was sauce for the gander. Since then he had resolved to set his face against all measures of this kind. 4 Lord PALMERSTON said, that the Hon. Bart. pur suing the theory of free trade, seemed to think equally LONDON. TUESDAY, JUNE 12,1827. STOCK KXCHANGEL, TWELVE O'CLOCK. The Coosa market has a firm appearance this morning. sad Consoh opened at $44 for the Account ; soon after were dime at s4f I, at which price they now mask steady, with little doing. In the Foreign market nothing is doing. Curran prices: Old Spanish 12 I. Mexican 44 1, C4llsabiast 254 29, Russian RR 4, Danish 61 W. CITY. TWO O'CLOCK. Up to the present tins!, there is not a feature in either 'market worth the least observadoo." Consols have remained steady the whole of the morning, with a Suctuatie• of about 1 per mat. and it present may be quoted at 841 I for the Account. PRICK OF STOCKS AT TWO O'CLOCK.. Bank Stock 2041 1 India Stock Shut S per Cent. Red. 83/ 84 Ditto Bonds 78 3 per Cent. Coos. Shrt. South Sea Stock 31 per Cent. 901 Old Annuities n per Cent. Roth 901 1 .noco Kadwq. Bala 45 46 per Cent. New Shut. £5OO Ditto 45 46 4 per Cent. Scrip £lOO and £2OO Ditto 41 46 4 per Cent. 1826,1001 I Advetdsed 44 44 45 Long Ann. IN 7-16 Cowls for Aect. 841 I FORZION FUNDS, TWO O'CLOCK. Brazilian Bds.s p Lt. Gr. 8d5.1825, 5 p C. 18 Do. Acct. 571 * Do Acct. Colombian Roods,. p C. IS Mez-8d5.t825,6 p Ct. Ditto 8d5,1624, 49 Do. AccL Ise 1 co. Aect.69l I Rua. lids, 1828,5pC. 991 Danish lids. 3p 1t.611 I Do. Am. MI I Do. Acct. Span. Ws 5 p Ct. 12 BRITISH AND FOKKIGN SHARKS, TWO O'CLOCK. MAIM rattan Bridals Iron Company 50 371 101 10 United Mexican 40 30 13 18e Marini Alliance 100 5 41 Proviscial Bank of Intend 100 2S 201 Faience Antes, Jim 9. Flee per Cents. lOU. 15e.--Three per Gets. 69f. 45c.—Bent Stock. 2,045 f. Neepoittaa Remus 75f. OW. We received this morning the Austrian Observe► to the 2d inst. containing news from Salamis to the 3d of May, being four days later than the date of the rte moored overthrow of the Turks before Athens. It , entirely overturns that report, though it represents the , cause of the Greeks in that quarter as highly favorable. and announces considerable advantage!, pined by them between the 25th and 29th of April. In this interval, the Turks were successively driven Irons most of their advanced pests, and, amongst the rest, from the Mo nastery of St. Speredion, which fell into the hands of the Greeks on the 28th by capitulation. The Turkar to the number of 300, defended the Monastery for four ' , days, under a heavy and almost uninterrupted fire from the Greek shipping in the'harboor, directed by Lord COCHRANR in person. It is said of his Lordship, as well as of General CHURCH, that they had been struck with the defence of the Turks, that they were extremely anxious to sive the lives of such brave men, and with this view repeatedly urged them to capitulate. They complied at last, but not until the Monastery was nearly reduced to a heap of rubbish, and they had obtained hostages, amongst the sons of the Capitani, for the faithful observance of the Articles. The remaining part of the proceeding is of so atrocious a character, that we cannot trust to our own feelings to describe it, and shall therefore give it in the words of the Austrian Observer, hoping for the sake of humanity, 'as well as for the credit of the Greeks, that the report may prove unfoooded..+ 6l As a security for the faithful execution of the capitulation, General CHURCH had given as hostages the sons and relations of some Greek Capitani, and ordered the cavalry to escort the Turks as they marched out of the breach. But these prevention§ were in vain. A Greek attempted to snatch his musket from a Turk ;the latter resisted& in the struggle the piece went off, bat without wounding the Greek; but this served as a signal for the massacre: The Greeks fell upon the Turks, and the efforts of General Cutntor could only save a few of them. The notorious Vaspt is said to have been the instigator. It is said Colonel Goaaox threw up his commission on the spot in contequeriee of this bee proceeding. and that General CHURCH de clared that he would immediately leave the army i f the guilty were dot punished as they deserved. Ten rf these are already arrested. On the 29th of April Lord COCHRAIIR left - the Pi its in his schooner. The whole naval force, amounting to about thirty sail, is to as semble at Pores. This measure seems to be in consequeree of the report of the sailing of the Egyptian fleet from Alexandria. On the Id of May an extraordinary movement was observed in the Greek camp. It is the highest time to attack, otherwise the Acropolis falls; l it is in the greatest distress ; for on the 21st April, the garrison signified by emissaries, who reached the Greek camp in the Piraeus in the night, that they could n ot hold out above ten days. Four thousand Greeks have marched towards Asomato, to attack the Turks is the Grove of Olives, in the rear, while the other corps attack in front. The Turks, however, are strongly intrencbN at all points, and seem fully prepared to await the aunt' We also received this morning the Algemeize Zaire: to the 6th inst. which contains various extracts from the Hydra Gazette (the friend of the laws) of the 20th and 2U April, which, though we gave the substance of thee before, will not prove Altogether unacceptable to me readers. One of them consists of a letter, of the Oh April, written by a Greek, serving under Lord Coca. aaaz, in which be says that letters had been received from the Acroplis of the 15th, describing the distress of the besieged and also their courage, as well as the hopes they placed in the exertions now making fte their relief.—The letter then desci ibes the arrival If Lord Coenamrs in the Greek camp near Athens, is tie following terms : of The Admiral came on shore with all his insignia and Officers, preceded by a standard, and went to the camp of KA saisium, Commander-in-Chief in Elam Greece. The old and brave Philhellene M. Maws harangued the army : the brave Lord promised 1,000 dollars to him who should take the standard of the Sam. Kum, and another 1,000 to him who should plant the Admiral's flag on the gate of the Acropolis ; besides other suitable rewards, for actions performed by the Greeks; and particularly for the first 100 men who shall enter the besieged fortress.—These speeches et ched in the Greek soldiers an enthusiasm which it is im possible to describe, so that a brisk canonade was opened against the Turkish camp, which was hardly put an end to by the night. _ _ . " As soon as his Lordship returned on board Mu schooner and saw that the other ships of the expeditios had come up, he ordered us also to weigh anchor, and so we anchored altogether before the Phalerus, and I suppose we shall land to-morrow. I learn, from good authority, that the Admiral and the Commander-in- Chief parted much pleased with each other, and geso• ral enthusiasm prevails among all the Gieek Officals and soldiers." We have in like manner received the Oriental Specter for to the beginning of May. Like the foregoing, it is wholly occupied with the Incitements of Lord Coca• RANI on his first arrival in Greece; but u it mentions no new facts, we shall not trouble the reader with the particulars. It may be proper, however, to observe, that at Smyrna, where the &leafed Spectator u pub. lisped, the arrival of his Lordship appears to boo made a profound impression both on' the Turks aid the European merchants. The list. :merlon too from Constantinople speak of the serious alarm which has been created there amongst all classes, and thq even mention that the Turkish Beet has been recall 4 lest it should fall a prey to the skill and intrepidity of his Lordship. This last statement, however, must be received with caution. The following Proclamation, if we are to believe the Paris Papas, which arrived last night, has been Word by his Lordship. We confess, however, that we have some doubts of its authenticity, as it is not probable that he would hold out the wealth of Smyrna, which is al. most entirely centred in the European merchants, and the British among the rest, as a legitimate prize for the Greeks: " To ma COOIIIIBIOO4 Pancomt or Sanas, LTCTUOS TIMM ATP TO sus Imumemers or ma lows " The onthosiarn with now nips in ad Grace Wass its 10111TpoOtilDOT ; that cameed and maim af ad the dim* d eleasseoniseasse that Marty and prosperky be audible sad will last far —y emstorisa. " 7h. Combos; and Poirmanseass so bow fear the email ably the blonds mood defuses and eamoem As owe at the int of Conmandoopie shall loam the Dardaselles, that at Gwent udder my consmand. shad fly to p.mr meow. Prepare, thee, 0 grogram oat may to defend yew . own Island; bat, if the enemy ho abithiately best ea the 00' autism of warlike anermises against Gases, to wry war go with me into his own slentinkiam The moats of the Greeks who groan is slavery. the O a ' swat of the devastation of Ildo sod Imam, and Indy the rids Odes Tarts of Smyrna, shall be the reward of year labours. (Signed) " COCH N& " Pint Admiral, and Chia( of the Naval Farce of Greece! " From the alp Greece, 6th (17th) April, 1617." Mr. Tansersou brought is a Bill last night for dig' fraticbloing die Borough of La Raiford, and treederriol Elective Fraschlse to the Tows of Blrulagiais ; sad rico tit Apparent feeliegs of the Moue es the wibject. the Bolt win prow bly puss the Commons with little or no opposition. as 10. i well of a free trade la votes, which he did not approve. Cases of gross and general corruption ought to be pu nished by those who were opposed to the theory of Parliamentary Reform; for what more powerful wea pon could they put in the hands of the reformer than a disregard for such practices? This case differed from Penryn, inasanch as that at Penryn but a small portion of the electors was bribed, and here the general body were•proved to be corrupt. The objection to the pi o ceedings in the Holston election were not well-founded, as the House bad passed two Bills against the Borough, which were thrown out in the Lords. _ _ After a few words from Mr. Tieetsoa la reply, the speeded was put, an 4 leave given to bring in the BM. The Smaf Debts 11W was road a snood thus, and ordered ta be committed on Friday. The Ministers Provision (Ireland) Eli, and the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Bid were read a third time, and passed. 'COMM PA 11011)11A L sern.manse BILL After a few words frpas Mr. Earcoesb oo this Bin, Mr. KENNEDY said, that owing to the late period of the Session, be would not press the mason farther this year. COT MILT The Report on this Ormight : ap. Oa the make that k be agre►d to, Mr. FYLER opposed the *leaser, as men to aggravate the evils it was meant t stare.—The House dlv For agreeing to the Report Against it M#ritp. . 6S . • ]6 • . • • -40. • • The BUJ was ordered to be raid a third time to.morrew. SALMON •111111111' SILL Mr. R. GRANT opposed the twitter F orm of the 1111•10 Yew- Mr. KENNEDY said, that though his *ohms of the sow dew he the MS were mitered, be would net press it is s = apt iesaionois be goad Dot bape to ~ all come the telt in tkis year. He would, however, befog it on nabs aril NO Session. He would now move that the Bill be takes Imo hither coosideratioo this day three mouths. 414 r. HUME expressed his regret that the MS should be with. drOwn.—Afterot few words from Mr. Ramosser, Mr. O'Niut, sod Mr. Wsnamaz, the Report was ordered to be farther cm oilfired that day three months. The farther consideration of the Report of the Game IW, mid Colonsittee at the Militia IW, were postponed until to-morrow (this day). IaLLIANE 111111131TURT WU. on the modes of Mr. Stomas Barium this Bill was read a third thee. The Report of the Committee on the Juries in Ireland Bill was brought up, sad ordered to be considered this day ee'anight. The Report of the Committee on the Lighting and Watching (Ireland) Sill, was brought up, and ordered to be considered this day sennight. The Consolidated Fund Bill, the Butter Trade (Ireland) BM, the Glass Dil4 the Exchequer-bills (4111,000,000) Bill, and the advances for Public Works Bill, were severally read a snood tisne, and ordered to be committed tomorrow. The Customs nil was read a Second That, and ordered to be committed on Thursday neat. Mr. SPRING RICE moved for ism to bring In a Bill to amend the law respectiog Manor Courts in Ireland; and a Bill to vegetate the sale el Bread in Ireland.—Granted. Mr. HERRIES moved for leave to brio; in a DUI to consoli date the Board of Stamps in Greet Britain sod Ireland. •aril! nano in sournasinuararon aIL L. jllr. TUBB YSON brought in a Bin for excluding the Borough of East Retford front the privilege of sending Burgesses to Par liantent, and for transferring it the town of Birmingham. The Bill was read a first thaw, and ordered to be read a second time en Monday. • Ik. FYLBE gave notice bb Intention, next Session, to move for leave to bring in a Bill to repeal a clam in the Election Ex roses INII, prohibiting the nee of ribands. The How then adjourned at Twznvv Moms before Twines. THE EVENING STAR.