Star. — London, England, 1829-07-09 00:00:00

Monday, July 27, Tuesday, and Wednesday—Re-hearing and Appeals. Thursday, July 30—The Fourth SeaL Friday, July 31—Petition. N.B. The Sittings will close on the 13tli of Mimi, 1829. Sacs, Causes, Facerwous, Fuatoss Dtszcstows, *en Psetwous, lireat Till VICSXMAJNIELLOR AMR Timm Tsui, 1822. Tuesday, July 14—The First Seal. Wednesday, July 13, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday—Causes. 'Monday, July 20—The Second Seal. Tutsday, July 21, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday—Causes. Saturday, July 25—The Third Seal. Monday, Judy 27, Tuesday, and Wednesday—Exceptions and Fusth , rr Directions. TblindaYs July 30—The Fourth Seal. Friday, July 31—Petitions. N.B. The Sittings will close on the 13th of August, 1822. COVET OF KINGS BENCH, Wsermarras. Jinx 5. THE KING V. HUGHES ♦ND OTHERS. • Mr. BRODRICE prayed the judgment of the Court upon Jo/:is Hushes, Robert Salmis, and Richard Purser, who had been convicted of having, with others, riot ously assembled in St. Luke's, Chelsea, and of having ass.tolted Miry Lewis and Rosa Lewis. It appeared that some of the defendants were bail for Henry Lewis, the husband of Mary Lewis, and that on the night of the Sd November, they forcibly arrested him tor the purpose of rendering him in discharge of bail. The defendants conducted themselves in a very veolent man lier. and assaulted the wife and daughter of Lewis.— Toe defendants locked up Lewis in a watcbhouse dur ing the night, and took him to prison nest day, where he afterwards died, in consequence, it was stated, of the ill treatment which he bad received. _ ..--........ _..._...._ The COURT, taking into consideration that two civil actions !tad been brought against the defendants fur the assaults on Lewis and his wife, and that the costs of these actions, as well as of the criminal prosecution, had reduced the defendants from a state of indepen dence to absolute poverty, sentenced them to pay a fine of one shilling, and then to be discharged. Another defendant, named Eagle, who was unable to attend in Court, was directed to be discharged upon payment of a like fine. Difrourt tt„, ":, : lit - 2.3,siv INTELLIGENCE. ( / I ( " .A 7 - 11- ';'i • L'?" - --1.-- Ptsrrsoie s . seven lug Lofts ~ ....... 1 , APPIALS, AM P I . - , 1129. 7 ... -vi . . . t!. :11,4", • 4 0 y, job , AVAZ I I Id . T I V I'4 1.4-. : 4 ' P m? ' . e Fins and Satulday—Re- ,... h i . 5, Thursday, Friday, I TAryr i gr a lit/tThe Second &al. . Tiaesday. July 11, Wednesday, Thursday, sad Friday—Re- ltar;nsi and Appeals. Saturday, July 45--The Third Seal. - . __ ... . ___. 12,-.11-.11..._11.-Lameino• ...A DUNN V. MURRAY. Lord 'T&NTERDEN pronounced the judgment of the Court upon this case, which was argued yesterday at cnnsid.-cable length. Ir appeared that the plaiatiff had been employed as a reporter by the defendant, proprietor of a newspaper, and having been dismissed from his service in August, 18'27, he brought an action for the amount of his salary to the end of the year. The cause was referred to a Barrister, who awarded a sum of 631. to be paid to the plaintiff for twelve weeks' salary, at five guineas per week, from the 4th of Angst, 1827, when the dis missal took place, to the 27th October following, when the action was brought. The 631. having been paid, the plaintiff afterwards brought the present action to recover the salary which he claimed front the 27th October to the end of the year. On the cause coming or, for trial, the parties agreed to a reference to a Bar rister, who had nuw made his award, finding that the plaintiff had cause of action, unless the Court should be of . pinion that the former action was to be considered as a bar to the second ; and awarding a sum of 521. to be paid to the plaintiff for his salary from the 27th Oct. 1827, to the end of the year. The COURT was of opinion that, is all matters in difference had been referred to the first arbitrator, the plaintiff ought to have brought before him the claim, which formed the subject of the second action. The' claim urged in the second action came fully within the terms of the first reference; and if the plaintiff chose not to bring it forward under the first reference, it was his• own neglect, and he ought not to be per witted to harass the defendant, by keeping back part of the case for the purpose of bringing a separate, action for it. A rule having been obtained to enter up judgment for '251. the amount of the second award, the Court discharged the rule. LIEEL Or THE LORD CHANCELLOR. THE RINO O. ALEXANDER, RISHER, AND ANOTHER. The COMMON SERGEANT, when called upon to make his motion said, he wished to mention the case of the King tr. Alexander and others, which had become an cx officio information. The Court, a few days since, made absolute a role for filing a criminal information against the defendants, for the publication of a libel on the Lord Chancellor in the Morning Journal. Not withstanding that proceeding, the patties yesterday re ceived notice to attend in Court and plead to an ez ecio information, for precisely the same libel. The C mmon Sergeant said he could not consider this the practice of the Court. Mr. Justice BATLEY asked at whose instance the in foisnatton was filed? Mr. DENMAN answered—lt is filed by the Attorney General, who acts for the Lord Chancellor. He was desitous of setting aside the criminal information. In the:case of the King v. Shannon, 2 Term Reports 198, it was laid down that a person seeking redress by criminal informa ion, waives his right to proceed by mail 4ction. Mr. Justice Ashurst delivering the judg. ment of the Court, said, they had considered the question fully, and they thought it right to lay it down as a general rule in future, that when a person applies for an information, it was understood that he waived his right to bring an action, unless the Court, baying the whole subject before them, should be uf • , opinion th at it was a case to be tried by a civil action, and should specifically give leave so to do. It Ire. qoently occurred that inlotinations were moved to sift out the opinion of the Court, when the party thinks there is little probability of succeeding. It is ui,rea sonably to engage the titre and attention of the Court in such a meaner, and such applications are nnnece— :my of the party resort to his private rea.edy ; and it an information is granted, it is of course to stay pro. cteJings in an action for the same cause. Tne paiu crple, M.D. contended, was the same in this case, and he presumed that when the information was moved, if their Lot dships had been apprised that an ex eel* infor m itron had been filed or intended, they would have paused before they made the rule absolute. This the Court would do in any case;' but a fortiori they would 11.1 It. seeing that the Aiturnej 7 General, who obtained the rule on the part of the Lord Chancellor, was the paste Ring the ex -officio. The Court, under such cir curnstances, would, no doubt, direct the Attorney 6.•'lerall to waive one or. the ottier proceeding. He did, ni t know exactly what infitunce they ought to have in such a case. • t, • • Taareaossib.:Whiri: is your motion ?' Mr..itsta"sealsokored that the iciattailisio which had befillqlll4 .. ielassaiiaW' ce of die rokeawde absolute be t slos &Ate 61e, and that tlitreale - be forthwith dealt with as if it bad been discharged. His hope was, that the Court would see it was contrary to justice that a paity should be subjected to two different formsof pro ceeding for the same offence, and that the parties so treated had been placed under circumstances of great disadvantage. An information had been moved, and when the parties bad answered the same upon oath they were exposed to all the disadvantages of a new pro ceeding. The case was new, and be should submit that in the appeal made to the discretion of the Court, they ought to deal with the es officio as if a criminal infor• nation had not been filed. It was only yesterday that the parties bad notice of the new proceeding. The ATTORNRY GINIRAL said, it Mr. Denman had been so candid as to have informed him of the nature of his application, as connected with his (the Attorney General's) name, and for which he bad waited some time, he should have told him it was not the intention of the Lord Chancellor to proceed on both the modes of prosecution. His Learned Friend had also stated a fact which was not correct. When he (the Attorney General) moved for the criminal information, he had no intention of filing an ex officio, and it was only cir cumstances which he was not obliged to state, since coming to his knowledge that— Lord TurraaDzsr—lnduced you to file the ex qfficie information? Mr. DENMAN—SureIy the parties ought not to be prejudiced by this change of purpose, of which they could know nothing. The ATTORNIT-GRNIRAL said there bad been no in formation put upon the file, in consequence of the rule, and that the defendants ought to know ; for if it had been filed, the parties would have been obliged to plead instanter, and proceed to trial next Sittings. Mr. DENMAN said, the question was not whether an information had been filed, but whether the rule sub sisting it might not be filed at any time ? Lord TIINTULDRN—They say that no proceeding has taken place, and if they proceed notwithstanding, that you may come to the Court again. Mr. Justice BAYLRY—And the rule drops in effect. Lord TINTRRDEN—We cannot restrain the Attorney. General, but we may restrain a private party from pro ceeding by action. Mr. Justice BAYLRY said, the proceeding ex-officio was a privilege in the hands of the Attorney-General, over which the Court had no coffin:tel. Mr, DENMANBut you have your own rule. Mr. Justice BAYLIT—What would you have us do with it? The rule was properly granted at the time. Mr. DENMAN repeated, that if the existence of the es-officio information had been known at the time the rule was moved, their Lordbhips would have imposed terms. Mr. Justice Bann—Could we impose terms? Mr. DENMAN-With great submission, upon the au thority of the case of the King and Sparrow, I think your Lordships could. Mr. Justice BAYLEY-I think not. Mr. DENMAN considered it within the power of the Court to modify their own rules; but he might ask why the Attorney-General interfered upon this occasion ? He was certainly irregular. Mr. Justice Bann—Then finish your motion. Mr. DENMAN said, although he did not contend that the Court could impose terms on the Attorney General, Lothey could on the Attorney General's client, the rd Chancellor. If an ea officio information had been filed at the time the criminal information was applied for, their Lordships would not have suffered the parties to be proceeded against by a double process. They would have said that the rule could not be made abso lute, unless upon the terms of not filing an ex qfficio information. He submitted that, all the parties being before the Court, the prosecutor was not entitled to any indulgence. The Attorney General might be promoted, and several other things might happen, to take the matter out of the personal directions of his Learned Friend. The defendants ought to be put out of all peril of the proceedings being adopted against him. The ATTORNEY GENERAL—What is your motion for ? I will show cause at once. Mr.!)ltNMAN—That the rule be discharged. The ATTORNEY GEMMEL then, with the permission of the Court, appeared to show cause against that motion in the first instance. He was quite indifferent as to the course the Court might adopt. He did not oppose the discharge of the rule, if their Lordships should consider it necessary. He should have commu nicated thus much to his Learned Friend, if he had asked him—and, under circumstances, he did not see why the motion was made on the last day of Term, unless it was to make an article for the newspapers. It was said, when he applied for the criminal information, he contemplated an a officio information, but he assured the Court that such was not the case, for be had no such intention that day, and it was only the day following that he had decided upon the course be had since taken. Their Lordships would not call upon him to disclose the circumstances which induced him to do his duty in that particular way ; but they would credit him when he said be had acted deliberately, and that, upon the best consideration of the case, he had thought it one which required an ex officio -information. He had also considered whether the defendants would be prejudiced, and if he had been aware that any prejudice could be done, he should have waived any advantage rather than subject them to inconvenience. Had the de fendant been proceeded against, on the criminal in formation, he must have pleaded instanter, and gone to trial instantly, whereas, under the es officio, he had longer time given him before trial. His Majesty's Government would undoubtedly place the information at once upon the file; but it was found more advanta geous to the defendant to take another course. The circumstances which induced him to change the mode of proceeding, he did not consider it necessary to dis close; and though he did not state them for the satis faction of the Morning Journal, or any other party, he hoped the Court would believe he had acted with due deliberation, and with no leek of humanity. It was easy for newspapers to attack a public officer, who had not equal facility of ausweiing them; because he did not publish newspaper to answer all they daily sent forth. He should not, thetetore, condescend to state the ciicumstances which infilenced the course he took; but their Lordships knew him too well to refuse him credit for deliberation and moderation. Mr. DIDIMAN did not cast any doubt on the deli beration and moderation shown by his Learned Friend in conducting this cause; but his hope was, that their Lordships would not be influenced by the in►inuations of the Attorney General respecting libels written against him in the Morning Journal. The ATTORbIEIt Gat►aeuAL—Nut on inc. I said upon the proceedings of the Court. Mr. DMIAW—Why, the proceedings of the Court are unfortunately so closely u,sociatett with my Learned Friend's name, that one cannot be alluded to without the other —(A laugh). The ATTOMPRY GENIRAL said he complained that EJit,rs of Newspapers hate advantages over others. Mr. DawasASl Yes; so has the Attorney General : !but' I would ask, whether, tecause the defendant is the IMF editor of a Paper, your Lordships will take for granted, without any affidavit, that he has published libels since on the Attorney General t He expressed a hope that the Court would put an end to this rule, and net leave it in the power of the present or any future Attorney General to carry it into effect, under some supposed change of circumstances over which his client could have no controul. it was not possible to apply to the Court sooner, as it was only yesterday that they had notice of this ex oJcio proceeding. His client swore that it was late last night, when, much to his surprise he received a summons to plead to an ex officio for the offence, for which a criminal information was pending against him. The Arroatay GOMA/. begged to be understood as not opposing the discharge of the rule. Lord TiNTZRDIDI hawing consulted with the oche, Judges, said the case was distinguishable from that of the " King v. Sparrow." When the rule for a criminal information was applied for, the Court thought it eught to be absolute. Since that proceeding the Attorney General had thought proper to file an ex officio infor mation; but as he might hereafter abandon that course of proceeding, it would be hard upon the pro• •te indi vidual aggrieved, for they must always treat the Lord Chancellor in such a case as a private individual, to be left without redre s. The Court therefore thought they did enough when they said this rule should not be pro• ceeded upon but with the leave o f the Court, and in the meantime •defendant would suffer no prejudice. All •hat was asked was, that a rule made absolute lor a cri minal information for a libel on the Lord Chancel or should not be proceeded upon but with the leave 01 the Court, and to that they gave consent. The ATTORNET-GiNIRAL assured his Learned Friend that no proceedings would be taken on the criminal in formation. Mr. DENNIANOUr only object was to be properly assured of this. Lord TINTERDEN—It comes to the same thing. Let the Rule stand as we have intimated. VICLCHANCRLLOR'S COURT, JULY 8. Al ASEAN° V. DAY AND ANOTHER. The SOLICITOR GlittißAL this morning moved for an injunction to restrain the defendants from selling or disposing of certain pictures. The plaintiff Joseph Marie Massano, is a Gentleman living at Rome. The defendant, Mr. Day, is the proprietor of the Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly. The plaintiff deposited with the de fendant, for the purpose of exhibition, the celebrat.d pictures of " the Martyrdom of St. Peter," by Murillo; " the Virgin and Infant," by Rubens; 4" the Rape of the Sabines," by the same artist, and •. Christ and St. Catherine," after Titian's school. The plaintiff bad found a purchaser for the pictures, and accordingly gave an order that they might be delivered, when I e found that they had been removed from the British Gallery. The plaintiff then applied there, when lie was told by the other defendant that he should not ee ivei them, and in addition, that he should keep them dining the season. Ths plaintiff then began to suspect that they were detained Dom some improper motive, and thought it proper to apply to the Court for this injunction. His Homoun immediately granted the injunction. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION HOUSE. A German, named ratlines Mulle►, who was said to be i mer chant of dAuence and respectability, was some days ago charged before Sir C. S. Huseas with having made so improper exhibition in the window of a chamber in the George and Vulture Tavern, in CornisM; and yesterday an application of rather an unusual hind was made to the Lord Mayor. The facts were as follow— Mr. Saltmanh, a Gentkman who resides near the tavern, stated upon the occasion of the charge, that the female servants of his family were most grossly insaked by the conduct of the defendant. who had bees in the habit of acting in the manner above described at the window of his (defendant's) chamber, and in full view of the complainant's house. Mr. Cope, the City Marshal, and 'riotous Ikrdslield, the taker, stated that they went to the complainant's holm, and, unseen by the defendant, witnessed the gross conduct of which be was said to have been frequently guilty. A friend of the defendant stated that the defendant was quite ignorant of the English language, and meant nothing by doing what he had done—(A laugh). The way to remedy the alair would be to remove him to another chamber in which be could not be seen. Sir C. S. Hanna said, the aoly remedy for such beastly conduct was pi osecution and punishment, and he ordered the defendant to Sod ball . — The proprietor of th e George and Vulture Tavern Im. mediately bailed him, and Yesterday Mr. Sakmarsh and Sir C. Hunter waited upon the Loan Mama, and made a statement to the following effect : " The defendant having transacted the business for which he came to this country, and being desirous to quit it as soon as pos sible, had made an offer of the sum of 100 L to a charity, upon cum. dition that the complainant would abandon the prosecution. " Mr. Saltmarsh esoddered that the payment of this sum would be a penalty in some degree apportioned to the offence. and thought that it would be advisable to forego the prosecution for so impor tant an advantage to a charity. He wished also, if the proposition was complied with, to name the institution upon which the money might be bestowed with propriety. To this suggestion Sir C. Hunter would not consent. He bad bound over the parties to proweeete (or the offence against public decency, and be would not be a party to a compromise in a matter in which the public were concerned. Mr. Hobkr said, that it was a case which a complainant might very naturally wish to have terminated in the way proposed. It world be desirable to benefit some charity by the sum of money, and it would be desirable to get such a fellow as Mr. blullar out of the country. Mr. Sakmarsh said, that the first offer made by the defendant was Ago, but he (complainant) held out for 4100 ; and he really thought it would be most advisable to accept of that sum, and let the defendant take himself off. The Lout &laves said that be should not decide In this ease until the defendant himself were In utendanee to make his appli cads:ea.-4%e defendant I. secoidingly to apply in propria persons. GUILDHALL. Is Hats—a.Genta• • Limas Tausiaa 7—Yesterday Mr. Weekly, at Ludgate.blll, appeared before Sir P. Lama, on I summons issued on the complaint of Mr. Alfred Lamb, a Gentleman re siding in New Hood-street. Mr. Lamb was passing up Ludgate.hlll a few days age, when be observed in Mr. Weekly's window a waistcoat-piece exposed far sale, the pattern of which awakened Mr. Lamb's admiration • ' and he entered the shop to purchase some of k. H e at fi rst In:I tended to take only one vest-piece, but a closer Inspeetion of the article only made him admire it still more; and \soldered& quan tity to be cut off to the value of 10s. 7d. The shorans% Masan having duly done their duty, Mr. lamb tendered a half guises coined in the year 1801, but which appeared to have passed through very few hands, ar.d looked as fresh as if just Issued from the mint. The airman refused to take it, as not being a current coin ; in consequence of which refusal Mr. Lamb went into Run dell and !kids's, which was only the next door, by whom be was Informed that the piece was perfectly unobjectionable. However, the shopman wuuM neither give back the bag-guinea, nor accept It in lieu of payment, considering be had a lien spots it, inasmuch as the waistcoat patterns being cut eff the piece were deteriorated in value. Mr. Lamb farther added, that he had received it only an hour before from a respectable Solicitor. and subsequently took the opinion of his banker, who pronounced the half-guinea to be a legal tender. Mr. Weekly replied that he considered the shopman justified in refusing the coin, because guineas and half-guineas have been with. drawn from circulation. However, in this instance, they might not have been so particular, only that Mr. Lamb bad called the shepman a fool. Now, akhough be sometimes took these coins through courtesy, still, as it was but courtesy, he did not feel him self called upon to nerds* it where such as epithet as " fool" was used. _ a St il l." said Sir Perna. " let the quesdon of Its being current or not current be u it stay. I don't ate what right you had to dr tain It." Mr. Holder, jag. who war at the judce.room in a auweacoo- I aimed with the present, was of opinion that the half-pdaea was good current coin of the realm. Sr Pius was of the same opinion, and therefore ordered Mr.l Weekly to restore it. with the addition of three shining. caw. "chard Weeks, a yoga( man, was charged before Eris Pima Lasts with havinsitoleo wren! yards of superfine cloth. valor 101. from the warehouses of Afr. Charles iardyn. of 846i:iglu11. street, between ten and eleven o'clock yesterday owning. George William Morgan saw the prisoner in Coleman•street in company with another person. The prisoner had the cloth on his shoulder; be stepped them, when they attacked him violently, s o moth so that he was climpelled to let the other man escape.—The prisoner was committed. BO WiiiSTR BET. Thomas Poise, a leen known young thief, who 'Moldy dis charged from prison on Tuesday, was charged with stealing tour putties of strawberries. J. Nevin, one of the watchmen of St. Martin's, stated, that be stepped the prisoner yesterday morning about three o'clock, with the fruit in his possession, and, knowing his character, rook him int. custody. Several market gardeners stepped faseard and said, they were constantly plundered by a desperate gang of Juvenile thieves that infested the market, and completely set them at defianee. the of diem said that he was rubbed of thirty putties of strawberries yes. terday morning. He, however, could nor ideistity those produced as his property.—The prisoner was committed for two Months as • a rogue and vagabond. MARY—LA—BONNE. Jahn Driscoll, an inveterate mendicant, was brought up by llsob Paring, a street-k.reper, for begging in Crawford-street. Perrin' bad matched him; he tumid a little money in his pocket., ass► three barn sandwiches in his bat, separately eliveluped in unsullied writing paper. The beggar had also in his pocket an invitation ticket, signed " Car Durre, Chairman," in which the •• favour s.f his company is requested on 31unday cycling next, tor the purpose of taking .upper with others in his line or calling or pro. !session. Mr. Itawlinson, looking at the ticker, said, befinew those entertainments were managed very cmufurcably ; and, turning to the prisoner, ask.ti him what he had to say ter himself. The beggar denied the charge, and said the street keeper spoke falsely, he was an aged infirm old man, who never troubled any body. Mr. It.twunsort--Oh yes, you do; you berg all day, and feast away and finish with a hop at night. Now, 31r. Miscall. I see Car Durra is to preside at the Robin Hood ea Monday night; who was Chairman at the last meeting? The prisoner pretended to ►e deaf, and the gaoler hallooed in his ear. •" The Magistrate asks you who was Chairman at your lug supper." Beggar—l.—l—l can't say. Mr. Itawurftom— What did you have for supper? Beggar—supper, your Wor►hip! I won't go there at all. your Worship. Mr. Itawiasson said he would prevent h's being there on Mon. day, and be seat him four 14 days to the House of Correction. W OltS II I Li—STREET. jams Smith, who was charged in April, with several other own, with being concirned in a murderous run piracy at Valise, 14 Easel, anal on which occasion he escaped, was chaiged with cum. nutting several forgeries. The first charge preferred against him was for !Oren the aceep. canes of his mother to a bill of exchange for IW. Ss. which he !mid to Mr. James, a miller, of ()sett, for flour. The prisoner's mother, who ►eeps the Dells public-bouss at Anse. proved that the signature to the note was a forgery. The prisoner was then charged with forging the acceptance of Jn•epb Peet, his uncle. to a bill of eichange for geol. which he paid to Ur. Cockerell, a farmer, at Great Burstrad. Es.es. Peet said, he could not write his name, and had never au thorised any one to accept a bill for tool. tot him. These were the only charges entered into, and the prisoner was committed for total. ii Alibb ibinimia ; __. LAM BRTH:STRRET. George I* was charged with ..ttemptilig to pan s counterfeit bait-crown, at the shop of Air. Mayers, a tallow chandler, in Caunon•sttect-road. Mayers stated, that on the previous evening the prisoner came to his shop, and purchasing some trilling articles, tendered a bad balf.crown in payment, and giving a very unsatisfactory account on himself, be sent for an officer, and gave him into custody. The prisoner, lo detente, said that before be was taken into cm tody, he told the officer where be bad taken the half crown, and aU shoot it. The officer replied, that the only account he gave him was. that he bad woo It playing at skittles, in Stepney. He (the of bad no doubt, U the prisoner was remanded to a future day, of being able to bring several other charges ot "smashing" against him, as within the List week or fortnight a gang had been very succor/Id in imposing on various tradesmen in the parish. The ptii - ooet wan aemorclingiy remanded until Tuesday neat. Tuesday morniag, between eight and nine o'clock, the warehouse of Messrs. Comber and Sons, silk manu facturers, Union-street, Bishopsgate, was entered by means of a skeleton key, and ten pieces of gros de Na ples, value 1001. were stolen. It appeared the clerk . locked the warehouse, and went with a child to school, leaving, as is usual, the ball door open. The ro►bets, taking advantage of his absence, opened the warehnnse door with a skeleton key, and apprehending his speedy return, they contented themselves with ten pieces, which they put into a black bag, and effected their escape with such precipitation that they lett the skeleton key in the door. On the return of the clerk the robber was instantly discovered, and information of the facts was conveyed to the Public Office, at Worship-street. Accordingly, Hanley; an officer, repaired to the Ware house, and received instructions as to the numbers and wr flog on the tickets, as well as their private marks, together with the colours and description of the silks, and which had only the day before come np from Colchester.. In the mean time, Tyne', an active officer, and one of the Bow-street patrol, coming to a know• ledge of the facts, and judging of the weight of silk stolen that it would be difficult for one man to catty it through the streets, he repaired to the coach stand at the bottom of Bishopsgate-street, and be there under stood that some short time before a coach had been employed to convey a large parcel, and that it took the direction of Shoreditch Church. The officer instantly followed, and suspecting a jou►neyman silk weaver, named Goodwin, who resides in Vincent -street, at the rear of Shoreditch Church, be repaired to his lodgings. and going up stairs he met Mrs. Goodwin, and asked her rt she had anything in the room that did not belong to her? She denied having anything of the kind; and when he drew the bag from under the bed, she then admitted that it was brought there when she and her bu.band were in bed. The officer then brought her and the propirty to Worship -street. and returned in quest of her husband and his companion. He had not been waiting many minutes when Goodwin and another man, named Stanley, went into Goodwin's lodgings; the officer followed and secured both, and brourbt them also to the Office, when they underwent a short • examination before Mr. Walker, when Mr. Comber, junior, clearly identified the property, and the prisoners were all remanded until Saturday. Thus, in less than one hour after the robbery, the property was recovered and the thieves io custody. BIRTHS. At Florence. die Lady of Calomel Shoo Wham, of a son. At Headline Barletta°, Norfolk, tits Lady of Sir G. Crewe, Hen. et 1 daytime,. [AR] At Kinptan Chem% near Portman* Captais Kiwis Rleh. R.N. to Sophia, ratingest daughter at Captain 0. F. Angelo. at Hill. Setitbanipton. At Malta, Henry, second son of R. W. C. Prime, &q. of Tidal- Why Lodge. Yorkshire, as Officer of the Royal Navy. At Memel, Mr.Wm.Tempk, of Notch Shields, mate of the ship Onyx, sged ea. At Bromky, the Lady Anne Fellair, wife of Robert Fraser. Req. of Tacked, and eldest daughter of the Karl of Lauderdale. At Plyssoith, on board his yacht, lately, where he had goat foe the bandit of his health, the Risk Hooourable Charles Barry, Lord ammonia. His tide mid estates have devolved upon his way brother, the Honouralek Deals-Arthur Bingham. now Lard Clanaterris. At the Mid Regimen Rdhiborgh, Lieut. Colonel Donald MaoDoaeld, C.B. lass of t. At St. Roque. Mawr Detidab Bruce, daughter of Mow Braes. Esq. of Aria. At adussellatrgb. Miss Elisabeth Campbell, daughter of the Ism Alexander Campbell, Esq. student, Maslow. In Rdgeidd (S.C.) Mardi 17. Ton, a tars map bikallk4 l . - Mrs. Ram, at the vest age of 130 lean. He died from for gratioil waste of asnars, without asp dissass. rod appmadflokkill Plio" - 7/0 1141 4wer.A_IS.. Lawns Prima and . - Publisbed by Jam Mulls. at 100 Poor Orrin, No.l, Pldwesidsor, Tompat'llisse Null THE his 1 That on ready to ret ONE To be del one Month Samples the Party tt The Corn at the Vietu Each Ten delivered be Person who mast attend T HE I 111131 NI To view th Galleries—th the Prospect for the recep To view tl To view tl Shillings. ANIICAUL riIHE D 11 the A ASSURANi will be given arrest, on TF Instant ; and Pleven of thi on each of ti of Year e iue tyu claim. a n i b e " ntl f the such end' payi to the respect' on their revel LEI FREEIIC HC A ins Roo with Thrre I Wale. Stable, tlow of an Ae The shove i will be Suid al For Partin; BUTLI rpHIS D use. and almost unnece of it. Comp Mineral or p usual objectio tlfrices. Its t at fact ive part; of the Teeth; stile even to Sold in boa ' owner St. Pau street, &Hub • whom may b ALMOND, 1 poetising the - The sh and address attention to tb NEW I With Observi Internal Re flee Ss. RACTI of the improved Syst Macy by nu some of which have been tote thereby fully c To which ar Meets. Semis abuw. for the long and blitCti Is adopted by Printed tor and sold by Catherine.stre, 137, Oxford.' Pall Mall; Si bad of all Bo)) " We came to the perusal phiots which flans. Severe health (runs at . • of eminent tal the highest op gratulate him wirer, and oft, LEA K curing, One small PIS case, will soon recovery. Na convenient dial K to see, as I fatty years rapt will effect a Cu avail nothing. this Medicine of both sexes I dens, within the proprietors, T. lege of Surgeon Boxes of only 4"rsi and Lig by their appoil Grafton-sire Dishorough's, Mean. 11l Dublin I and Great Britai e T. Taylor, 1