Star. — London, England, 1820-07-18 00:00:00

banns had been irregular it should be left 'to the .lodge to decide whether it was a bona „fide marriage. Such a provision would inevitably lead to a degree of profligacy of which it was difficult to form an estimate, a:.l he was only surprised how it oculd Lave entered the head of any individual. He doubt-. ed much whether any Judge could be safely in vested with this discretion ; and if all cases of mar riage by license Were to fall within the same clause, it would be much better to abolish marriage by li cense altogether. The Earl of WESTMORELAND urged-the pro priety of going into the Committee. The LORD CHANCELLOR again declared that he never would agree to a retrospective Bill. He could not vote for going into the Committee, though, as the Bill might be entirely altered, and become a new measure, he should not press his objections further. The House then went into the Committee. Several Itew clauses were rroposed by Lord BccENeonnucti: they were ordered to be printed, and tl.e Bill to be re-committed on WeJnesday. CItIMIN AI. LAtVS. The Marquis of LANSDOWN said, .he Jose to move the second reading of the three Bills wl4ch had passed the other House relative to the mitigation of the severity of the criminal-law in particular cases.— Vie first of these laws to which he begged leave to call their Lordships' attention, was that which took away capital punishment from the offence of pi s ately stealing in a shop to the value of five shillings. • lie should briefly endeavour to state to their Lord ships the grounds upon which he thought the pre sent measure urgently called for. He should not.do their Lordships the injustice to suppose that they world be willing to.continue a law on their statute books which was unnecessarily severe in its provi sins and inoperative in its effects. If, then, they were of opinion, as he was convinced they must, that such a law did not tend to assist, but to impede and retard the cause of justice, he was persuaded they Nvould readily assent to a modification of it. A law that tended to deter prosecutors mist witnesses from coming forward to give their testimony was a dis grace to the statute book ; and the sooner it was got rid of the better. In fact, he would assert, without fear of contradission, that the law had hardly been acted upon at all for the last thirty or forty years.— During that time, its extreme severity had armed, be sides the prosecutors and witnesses, the Judges them selves against it. Indeed, this was visible even iu - cases where the cause of justice imperiously de manded that prosecution should take place. It was a well autheeticated fact, that prosecutors acquiesced in the depredations committed upon theni, rather than they would allow themselves to give testimony incases where the punishment was so disproportionate to the offence. They could not be induced to subject a fellow-creature to the loss of life under such circum stances, and were better pleased to forego the loss of property, than to punish the delinquent with the last infliction that the penal code could adjudge. To chew that the law was to all intents and purposes inoperative, it woul4 be only necessary for him to advost to a short statement of facts which he held in his hand. From the year 180$ to the year.lBlB, not less than 3.52 convictions had taken place under the law, bat not one execution. In London and West minster not more than one execution had taken place under it during a whole century. There had been only'one execration likewise in the Northern districts; and out of .55 convictions in the Western counties, no execution had taken place. In Lancashire, from 1793 to ISIS, them had been nine convictions and no execution. It was quite sufticient to prove the necessity of altering this law, that tradesmen, a class of people whose habits rendered them peculiarly acute and attentive to their own interests, were the first to come forward and seek a commutation of it. Shopkeepers were known to claim an exemption from prosecuting under it, so sensible were they of its dis graceful severity. Two most repectable tradesmen had stated, that they had frequently acquiesced in thefts cornnrited upon their property from a reluc tance to prosecute the offenders, because their lives must . be forfeited. Ile should then ask their Lord ships if, after such evidence, the evidence of per sons belonging to a class of r.sen who were known to pay a keen attention to tier protection of their pro perty—he would ask their Lordships if, after all that bad passed in the other Howe of Parliament, and the final sanction of that House to the measure, they could still be disposed to object to the partial repeal of this law? Ile should detain their Lordships no longer, but would move —e That the Bill be read a third time," reserving to himself' the right of giving explanations on the subject that might be necessary. The LORI) CHANCELLOR expressed his regret that the Noble Marquis had felt it his duty to intro duce this motion before their Lordships, who had the opinions of the twelve Judges upon its general me rits. The verdicts of Juries under the law in ques tion, had not always met with the approbation of the Judges. In former stages, these Bills had been invariably opposed by that great and experienced 111 A , - the late Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Ring's Bench. It WAS slid' by the supporters of this Bill, That it was hard to take away the life of an in dividual for stealing only to the value of five shil lings in a shop. But what did the. motion now be fore their Lordships profess to do? Why, it went to exempt that person from capital punishment, who, taking advantage of the owner of a shop, might enter it, and take away property sufficient to ruin an in-, dustrious tradesman. The existing law was never' meant to protect persons of large, but of small pro perty. Ile should say that this Bill, by taking away capital punishment from the crime of that person rho should despoil a man of the whole fruits of a life of industry, must operate most injuriously against the-commercial welfare. He could not consider it in any respect a wholesome proceeding. He .had observed the Reports of the Recorder for eighteen years, and was surprised to find so very little regret expressed by Juries in giving verdicts under the law. He was not disposed, however, to make any mate rial objection to the motion, yet he would say, that it' shoplifting was to be held as a crime, their Lord ships ought to consider whether it would be prudent to alter diatlaw which had so long existed against it. Lord REDESDALE said, that to form an accu rati estimate a the law as it now stood,she best way certainly "was, to consider only how many were de tensed from prosecuitng. by the severity of its opera -4i9; so a4o it was equally right to consider how many were deterred from committing the crime by the same severity. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that in the *tent of the Bill heing.read athird time, he should propose an Amendmera, a reserving capital pun4h- Mena, in cases of theft, where the.property stolen should be above the value of ten pounds. ' Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, but their Lordships did nor divide on the motion, and the Bill was read a third time and passed with the proposed Amendment. COMMUTATION OF PUNISIIMiNTT - FOR FELONICs BILL. Lord REDESDALE objected to the clause in this Bill for exempting persons with their. faces blacked, or otherwise disguised, from capital punishment, in cases where it is provided for by the existing law. The Marquis of LANSDOWN urged the expedi ency of commuting the punishment to transportation. The LORD CHANCELLOR adverted to several clauses of the Bill, assenting to some of them and objecting to others. It was, he said, consistent s ith our syvem of jurisprudence to include the %Ili ions cases of the slime offence under one common descrip tion of punishment, and it was left td mercy to inter pose in behalf of the offender, where the circum stances were such asto justify mitigation. He thought the punishment ought to be suffered to continue in cases of wilful depredation on grounds or planta-' Lions where trees were rooted up, and other serious injury done. Much valuable property might be de stroyed in this way, and the punishment ought to continue, if perscins were not to be let loose to do all the Mischief they could. He should not object to an alteration being made in bankrUpt cases, because from long experience he thought it necessaryt He believed, for forty years not more than two or three capital convictions had taken place in such cases., The statute of Geo. 111. which made it a capital fe lony to break dawn banks, ought still, be Was per suaded, to be continued in force. Incalculable mis chief might be done by the offence which that statute contemplates. A man's whole property might per haps be destroyed by it. He .decidedly objected to the commutation of capital punishment in cases of writing threatening letters. This Bill provided, that capital punishment should take place only where the letter contained a threatening demand for money ; but, in his opinion, a threatening letter of any de scription, ought to subject the writer to the heaviest penalty of the law. _ He knew of no greater source of anxiety arid alarm to individuals and families, than I threatening letteri. The" Noble and Learned Lord, after a- few more observations, snggcsted to the No ble Marquis the expediency of postponing the third reading of the Bill till to-morrow, that he might have time to examine its merits more fully. - ' .The Marquis of LANSDOWN intimated his as sent to the suggestion, and said, that he thought transportation for life quite a sufficient punishment, in any of the cases mentioned by the Noble and Learned Lord. The Noble Marquis then moved, " That a Message be sent to the Lower House of Par liament for a copy of the Report of the Committee of: 1819, appointed to consider the laws relating to ca pital punishments." Motion agreed to.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. S. C. WHITBREAD presented a Petition from Charles William Pitt, of Adam-street, Adelphi, complaining of de nial of Justice in the Court of Common Pleas,—Laid on the table. Upon the Motion of Sir J. GRAHAM., Pellew's Divorce Bill was read a second time and committed. The House resumed, and the /3111 was ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. Mr. C. CALVERT moved fur a Return of the aggregate amount of Fees received in the Court in Southwark, for the recovery of Small Debts, for a certain period of years. He ex pressed his intention to found a Bill on these papers in the course of neat Session : and, from an account which he held in his hand he could nat.:, that for the recovery of only one shilling, the fees paid in Southwark were 165. 3d. a third greater than anywhere else. He stated that the fees for the recovery of one shilling. in London, were 10s. 6cl. In Fulwood's Rents, Ss. 6d. in the Tower Hamlets, Ss. 9d. and in Vine-street, Westminster, ss. 9d. He did not see why the charges in Southwark should so much exceed the charges In the places he had just mentioned. The Return was then ordered. . Mr. F. BUXTON moved for a Return of the number of Hindoo widows who had been consumed in the funeral piles of their late husbands, for the last ten years.—Ordered. Mr. HUME moved for Returns connected with the sum of X 10,700, which had been committed, in 1794, to the hands of Colonel M'Mahon, for the Earl of Moira, now Marquis of Hastings; and also a sum of X 2,400, which had been given to Mr. Phipps, Deputy Paymaster in the West Indies.—Ordered. The Scotch . Fisheiles Bill was read a third time and passed. Lord MOUNTCHA IMES moved the printing of certain papers relating to the intercourse wits Ireland.—Ordered. The SPEAKER informed the House, that he had received from the Clerk of the Ilanaper Office in Ireland, a Petition concerning the late Election in Dublin. The Petition was then read, and it appeared to be the Petition of Air. Grattan, complaining of the undue return of the Mem ber lately elected for the I.:try of Dublin.—lt was ordered to be taken into consideration on Tuesday fortnight. Mr. STUART WORTLEY presented a Petition from three Gentlemen, who were the assignees of the person at whose suit Richard Christie Burton had been arrested. These Gentlemen were subjected to considerable loss through the liberation of that person by an order of the House. Though he wished Members of Parliament to be in all cases protected from arrest, yet be thought there ought to be some law provided for the relief of persons who sustained a positive loss from obedience to an order of that House. The Petition wu read, and after a few words from Mr. Witarereaca and Mr. &eras, ordered to lie on the table. Mr. BATHURST presented a Petition from a number of persona confined for debt in the Kings Bench Prison praying for a continuance of the Insolvent Debtors' IXll.—Ordered to be printed. &r WILLIAM CURTIS presented a Pctiiion from certain persons who, prior to the year Me, had acted as 'ride-sur veyors, Tide—waiters, and Waterniin, in the service of the Cus toms, and who had been dismissed from their situations in con sequence of an error of which they were unconscious at the time. Laid on the table. • The Irish Promissory Note Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. CATHOLIC PETITIONS. PLUNKET begged to state to the House. that he had been entrusted with two Petitions, one from certain Parishes in Dublin, the other generally. from the ii.habiumts of that City, on beh alf of the Roman Catholics of Ireland. The first Peti tion was numerously and most respectably signed, and deserved every consideration. The other was also numerously signed, and among the signatures were those of all of that persuasion in that Metropolis, who were • distinguished by rank and station. He might fairly state, that it contained the general sentiments of the Roman Catholics of Dublin. Ile thought it right to ap prize the House that he w. uld not brirm forward any measure relating to this question at present, and he would give his reasons why he thought that such a proposition would be inexpedient. Ile felt, that while another great and important question was undispused of, he should have been wantiog in respect both to the Parliament and the country, if he brought forward any pro position which would in the least einharrass their consideration of that great question. Until that question, the settlement of which would require the undivided exertioDs of every honest man in England—(Hear ' Fear)—was •decided, he did not think he would have discharged his duty. if he had done anything to distract the attention of Parliament and agitate the feelir.gs of the Public---Ifear,hear). But at the same time lac felt that the . interests entrusted to his ease were of momentous importair. . • and he hoped that nothing might occur which would render it I rivets/Jul that they should be long kept back, and that he might have an ask opportunity of bringing them before the House: Ia pupodlrbee of that course; which he trusted would meet with the approbation of the friends as well as enemies--herneaot po litical enenties, of the Ronsan Catholics, he would now abstain srom farther-observation ; and he conclu ded with expressing his hope, that at he had now yielded to matters of so urgent a na ture, it would be admitted, when the quest:on of the Roman Catholics of Ireland came before the Ilcuse, that they were Persons whose character untitled them to a full and candid dis cussion of their claims—(Heor, hear). BARRACKS IN TEM REGENT ' S PARK. On the motion of the CUANCTLLOa of the Incurraura, the Report on the Bill for the erection of these Berracke was brought up ; and on the question that it be received, Mr. CALCRAFT took this opportueity of renewing hi op position to this Bill. Ile was surprised at the pertinacb y with which this measure was Pushed 'forward by the Right lion. Gentleman. Ile stated that the Barracks were unnecessary, as the troops might hare the Barracks which they before occupied. There was one thing of which he peculiarly cemplairted. The ground upon which these Barracks were to be erected, belonged to the Crown and is in the prissestion of the Crown. The con tractors, therefore, could ret have possibly commenced on their own risk, and yet not until after they had been actually com menced was any intimation given of such an expenditure to the House. Ft should also be remembered that these Barracks were agreed for without any competition, save a circular letter which was addressed to two or three other builders. Of this he was certain, that everything which could be foregone, oeght to be so, in the present state of the finances of the country. It had been said, indeed, that if the troops were not in barracks there might be greaedanger of a want of discipline among them. But these very troops bad been hitherto in that very danger, as it was called, and yet when were they accused t f a *ant of dis cipline? On the contrary, they had shewn at Waterloo that they wanteel neither discipline nor bravery—(l! or, laar,,hear). If the house would throw back this agreement upon the Right Hen. Gentleman, it would give Lim such a caution, as-would ht ' future render such contracts meth snore...atleanrageous to the Public. lie concluded with moving, that the Report be received this day six months. Mr. THOMAS WILSON contended, that if the le.rgain had been properly made, the country would be burthreed with the annuity of £5400 for no more than twenty-nine years instead of thirty-one years. The rate of that annuity was in fact seven and three-quarters per cent. a rate which he could not but con sider exorbitant—(!hear, hear). A Mutant from under the gallery said, that any person who went to the It. gent's Park, might see a large pile of bricks and other materials collected for those Barracks. He would ask, were the works now to he stopped? Mr. CA LCRA FT replied, that the lion. Member had struck upon the very gist of the whole question. What he complained of was, that men bad been set to a work, which was to cost the Public £70,000, without the consent of the House of Commons having been even asked upon the point—(H ear, hear). The same Mtwara, under the gallery, asked, if the works were to be now stopped, who was to pay for the materials? Mr. CALCRAFf answered, that in his opinion the Cabinet were to pay for thenn(Hear, hear, cud laughter). Mr. LENNAUD supported the Amendment. He contended it was a fallacy to say that these Barracks would colt theicoun. try no more than £5400 a year for ZI years. They must be kept in repair, and were liable to other contingencies which could not but produce expense. Nay, the whole amount of the annuity, would of itself cost the country £4OOO a year for ever. The question was then put, and the gallery was cleared for a division: For the original question - - 92 For the amendment - - 74 Majority in faviur of the Barracks —lB CITY OP LONDON PPTITION. • lie Sheriffs of London appeared at the Bar, and presented a Petirion from the Lord Mayor, Alde r men, and Commoners, of the City of London, in Common Council a:sembled.—The She riffs having withdrawn, Mr. Alderman WOOD rose and stated, that • this Petition , was agreed to by a large majority ; indeed, there were only ten hands raised against it. He had no doubt that it would meet with every consideration which the Petition of such a respect able Assembly deserved. He had only to add, that he agreed 1 to every word contained in that Petition. The Petition was then read. It stated, that the Bill of Pains and Penalties, now penditig in the Hocse of Lords against her Majesty the Queen, was sounded upon proceedings which mi litated against the established rules of justice and equity, and were calculated to weaken the stability of the Throne; that the Bill charged offences to have been committed during a period of six years, without a specification of time or place; that it ap peared to the Petitioners ' that by persisting in such a course, the principles of the Constitution would be s violated, and they prayed, that should it be yet the pleasure of Parliament to pro ceed agaitot her Majesty, means might be adopted founded upon known and established law; so that whether her Majesty be found guilty or declared innocent, the jurisprudence of the country, and its admirable Constitution, might be even exalted by the result.—The Petition was then laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. IRISH DISTILLERY RILLS, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the second reading of the above Bills. Lord Al OUNTCH ARLES expressed an earnest desire that his Right Honourable Friend would not press the Bills connected with the Irish Distilleries until after the Recess. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said it was, not intended to do so. Every Gentleman would be afforded an opportunity for the consideradon of the measure. General HART said, that these Bills would only clog the small Distilleries; r .1 be oQno use to the large ones. The Bill providing for the Collection and Security of the Du ties on Spirits distilled in Ireland, in stills exceeding one hun dred gallons, was then read a second dine, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. The Small Still Bill, and the Excise Police Bill, were also read a second time, and ordered to - be committed to-morrow. Mr. C. H. HUTCIUNSON postponed, till t Motion respecting the Irish Distillers. ~ his GUADALOUPE CLAIVS-GENERAL DrrounmEAux. Mr. IRVING brought up the Report of the Committee on the Guadaloupe Claims. The Ibinourable Gentleman said he was exceedingly anxious that the whole of the testimony on which the proceeding of the Committee was founded should be in the hands of every Gentleman. They had investigated the case, not on legal evidence, but on such evidence as appeared to them sufficient to skew its real merits. The transaction which was referred to the Committee appeared to them to be one of great hardship, and they had dectded it accordingly. He cer tainly did not expect, when this Report was presented, that any bpposition would be given to it. He now,• howeVer, under. stood that considerable resistance would be made to the claim, and he was prepared to meet it. Mr. BANKES could not agree that a large sum of money, depending on a claim of upwards of twenty years' standing, should be granted, at the end of the Session, ley a single vote of that House. Why was it not inserted among the Estimates, and submitted to a Committee of Supply? It could, in that case, be considered in the Committee, on the bringing up of the Re port, and in different other stages. Mr. IItVIN G felt the hardship of the case which was new tender-the consideration of the Howie; and in proportion as he felt its hardship, he was anxious to relieve the individual front the painful situation in which he had been long placed.. It wi.s, however, quite impossible that the case could be considered id the present Session--(Henr, pier).—He Would, howevei, at the earliest period the-House could admit, bring it forward, in the next Session. The Report was laid on the W)le, and ordered to be rtinted. THE QUEEN. Dr, LUSHINGTON said—" I rise, in pursuatice of the notice,which I gave to the House on'Saturday, to move an Address to his Majesty; that he•will.he• graciously pleased to give directions that - there lie laid before this - House Copies of all , OtEcial Vaperi relative to the Service of Plate presented by his late Majesty to her Majesty the Queen. It is a matter...of regret to me, that any inter ion should lw..ve been' suppo,ted to exist on my part to take the Tlptise by ; surprise, in.the Motion which I then.lll:o. the contrary, it -Was my most anxious desire to' afford ; every opportunity for explanation 39 his Majesty's Ministeis. I was aware that xny Learned .Priend (the Solicitor-General of the Queen), had made earlicat coulMuujc.ation upon tlii.t4sokiect 0.) thePoliiv Lord, the Secretary of state for Forrien AfLite, and in consequence d of that communication, I gave lets notice than I should otherwise have done; but I ut terly deny any wish or intention on my part to tal.e the House by surprise ; and I am perfectly convinced that if, either in fact or in intention, any such circere stance had taken place, it would have received the heaviest displeasure of her Majesty the Queen. Ha-. ing now, I trust, set myself right with the Ihvoe peon I shall shortly detail the circer stances this cesupo p n o which ilit the Motion with which it me intention to conclude is feueded. In the year his late Majesty was graciously pleased to ooler, f ts the use of her Majesty the Queen, a Service of Plate. The Service was - made after her Majesty's own taste. and was presented by the King himself to her :Ma. jesty, for her use and enjoyment. The order came through the Lord Chamberlain, the Service was paid for by the Lord Chamberlain, and, till the year i Elsie her Majesty continued in the possession of it, es: t h ou: question or controul. At that period- her :' , /acsay was residing in apartments in Kensington and ueon her quitting that residence the Plate see s delivered over by her to Mr. :Mash, of the Lo-d Chamberlain's Othce, with an express onderstar:ii-se that it was the property of her Majesty, and that ever she returned to this country, it would be re claimed for her use. Upon her moire, to this couetne her Majesty foundherself wisher t any of those articles which could contribute to her comfort or enjoymeet, She found herself hi a state of destitution, which, I believe and hope, for the honour of the country, is utterly unparalleled in the case of any Queen of England: Under these circumstances, her Majesty, being literally without any one article for her daily use—(hear)—was pleased that .an stpplication should be n•ade to Mr. Mash for the service of plate. Mr. Ma h reelied, .that he did not conceive himself es thorised to deliver the plate to her Majesty without the authority of the Lord Chamberlain. Upon ae. plicetion being made to the Lor.l Chamberlain, feat Noble Lord replied to the Lady in Waning in the Bel lowing tsrms : The Lord Chamberlain availed him. self of the earliest occasion to bring the subject of the note with which he was hole tired by La.: y :knee Hamilton before the King; and it having hien ao certained by official documents, that the j late in question 'is Crown property, his Majesty seas not s leased to issue any orders for removing it . owe d o . Jewel Office, Orfrere it is deposited.' Such being the answer of tbeLord Chamherlain, I ;rust I shall net be considered guilty of any indecorum, or of any breach of that most valuable Order of this House, which prohibits Members from, adverting in any manner to the name of the King e if I treat the letter of the Lord Chamberlain as having received the sanc tion and authority .of hi; Majesty's Ministers. I treat it as having - issued lon thes - ! - •;ssiskeLord him self; and I do berreis'e and trust the Noble Lord mill consent to that view of the questinn, and Lot be in, duced, as some others heve boen, to shake reseons:. hility from his own sheulders upon persons who are wholly irresponsthle—(Cries of Hear, hear,henr). If I were to confess my own honest sentiments, I am persuaded the liberal and•gentlemanly dis; coition Of the Noble Lord .would never have dictated such ad vice as.appears to have been given from the contents of this letter, but.that it must have emanated from some person anxious to raise. himself by the depres sion of her Majesty, a:id base enough to sun) to the disgusting task of irritating the Royal mind to acts which can only tend to the degradation of Crown, and to. the injury of the he'st interests.of the coun try—(Hear, bear. hear). With re,pect.to the course which has beets pursued upon the present occasion, it appears to me that there are only teo grounds or rather surmises, for they do not deserve the name of grounds, upon which his Majesty's 2:- vise's can have proceeded. The first is, that the pla'e was bona.fidc the property of the Crown; that it we; never for tr moment divested out of the Crown, una was strictly a loan to her Majesty, though she en joyed the use and occupation of it. In the next place, I shall require something more thati bare assertion, to believe, that when the plate was delivered to Ea Majesty, it was intended that she should only hate a qua.ified use and enjoyment of it. Such a supposi tion is contrary to all past experience; for when plate has been ordered by the Lord Chamberlain, paid for by the Lord Chamberlain, and delivered to Minces of foreign States, and Ambassadors, is there any in stance in which such a construction has been set ae, or in which a demand of restitution has been made? But if the present was supposed to be accompanied with any condition, it is a tittle extra rdicary th.tt the Crown should have thought proper to order that the plate should be manufac.ured according to the taste and fancy of her Majesty-.(Hear, hear, hear). — In my humble opinion it is not very respectful to the memory of his late Majesty, to suppose that he should have annexed any coneitions to an act sf bounty to her Majesty, to whom, upon all occaeiore, he had evinced his most gracious favour and protec tion.. But admitting that there was an understand ing that if her Majesty went abroad she should for feit for a time • the use Of this plate, I will put it ta the Hoese whether; in common decency and common sense, is Ought:to be refused to her upon her return? Is it consistent with either justice or feeling, te because: her Majesty is accused the should be treated as if, she were condemned ; and that before any in vestigation haseaken •plate,. she should be thrown into a situation of degradation and disgrace? Is just or manly to condemn her Majesty to a situation in which she is:not .ottly prevented from enjoying her high tights and privileeas as a Sovereign, bet even trona possessing those ordinary comforts to which an English Ladois entitled ?—(Hear, GOD have mercy upon the heart of that man who was capahle of suggesting to his Majesty ses i si Advice, who could solar. toiget what was dee !e himself aiWhis Sovereigno.ais to. advise meast:ni lending to involve the Crosynsio disgrace, and ,excie indiguetkon flow siee: end. sei. - the - country to the oilier... les reol. les of England feel this—if ;ten has been guilty of erityomisconduct, the tarts Will- tome arrive evitert herr fate is to be decijed ; fat .her be tried 'openly, hotieetly, and according to dot • course of law ;shut Goo forbid that die s. (mid be -Vexed with those mean and petty insults Mete is one other - vii w . of this subject which I berdly. _dare to apticiPete in fily own mind, tad to I'vehieli 1 shelf merely advert 'as 40 a case trench is barely possible ; I mean; that when the plate mos F rio stated to bee Majesty, alit Vas'kjenote amerte, nerd 5e 4 1'4 1 4.) . .i.041 - 4bie pf talcip ti„ticrty for hersesi e• • .