Star. — London, England, 1827-05-16 00:00:00

aspaw4t,P , lENT. 4 %AI •Ah \ HOUSE OF LORDS, MAT 15. Tie arse Report of the Commisslonen of the Metrepoliten Turn. pike Rn•A‘ north of London, was presented at the Bar, pumas* to an Act of Parliament. Mr. Hone Dau,exoxa, and othertfreen the Comeneen, bonen up the Bill for regulating the prosecudon of fraudulent Bankrupts in Scotland, and several Private Bilis. COIN Laws. M a r q uis CAMDEN presented Petitions against may alteration is the Corn Laws, from the Hundred of Rodsedield, in the county of Soso, and from some Parishes in Kest. The Earl of M A LMES BU NY presented Petitions to the same effect, from parishes in the county of Hants and Southampton; signore from Banbury, in O x fordshire, which included in it the question of won! ; and the Petitioners confirmed the statements which bad already been made to their Lordships, that they had two or three Years' stock upon hand. The Earl of ROSEBERY presented P etitions ■against any alteration in the Cern Laws, from several parishes to the county of Norfolk. Lord TEYNH A M presented a Petition to the same effect from a Hundred in Norfolk. The Marquis of BUTE presented a Petition from a Parish in the county of Becks, against any akeratiors in the Corn Laws. The Petition stated a curious fact, that the sums paid from the = rates to labourers out of employ, fee the years 1825 to 181111 sive, were exactly in inverse proportion to the price of core** same period. Earl DIGBY presented a Petition from a parish in Neeillit h against any alteration in the Coro Laws. The Earl of WINCHELSEA presented a Pedtimi temithe growers of wool in Ashford, Kent, against the impurtedonal fo reign wool. The Earl of BROWNLOW presented a Petition fronds' breeders of cattle in a parish in Lincolnshire, spinet the lawns doe of bulls' hides and tallow. Earl FITZ W I LLIA presented a Petition from the Seamen of the Port of Hull, praying for a revision of the Naviption Laws. THE W AICILTIELD/L Lord REDESDALE presented a Petition from Wil liam Turner, Esq. of Shrigley Park, in the county of Cheshire, praying that leave might be given to bring in a Bill to annul and declare void the alleged marriage between his daughter, Ellen Turner, a maiden, ander sixteen years of age, and Mr. Edward Gilstom Wakefield. With respect to the circumstances under which this mart iage had taken place, it would be ne cessary for him to observe to their Lordships, throe Mr. C. Wakefield, and the other persons concerned in bring ing it about, had been lately tried and found gu Ity "of a conspiracy to carry away, by fraud and delusion, from her patents and friends, Miss E. Turner, being a maiden under 16 years of age, and afterwards to compel her, by • fraud and intimidation, to a marriage with E.G. Wake. field." The case was ao extremely novel one, for it ap peared that there had been none such for the last century. The only one of any thing like a similar nature with which be was acquainted, was to be found in the Statute book in the year 1691. The daughter of a Mr. Whar ton, had been run away with, and compelled to marry a Mr. Campbell. She was subsequently rescued from him, and a bill was brought into Parliament for the purpose of dissolving the marriage which she had been induced to contract. The Bill had been first brought forward in the House of Commons, when it was deter mined that the young Lady was competent to give evi dence, upon the principle, that, without here, the body of evidence must have been necessarily incomplete. The Noble Lord consluded, by stating, that, he had recommended the line of conduct which it was Mr. Turner's intention to pursue, in applying for the disso lution of his daughter's marriage. From con-ideration of the novelty of the case, he had been anxious that a petition should be, in the first place, laid before their Lordships, and referred to a Committee of the whole House; he was convinced that by these means the sub ject would be discussed with the most advantage. ; The Earl of LAUDERDALE thought that the very first. thing to be proved was, that the marriage alluded ' to in the Petition was a valid marriage. That House was not the place in wh:ch a divorce could be granted, unless it had been clearly decided by the Colitis of Law, which had the proper jurisdiction, that the mar riage was valid. Lord REDESDALE thought that the observations the Noble Lord had just made proved the propriety of the course that he had suggested being followed— namely, that the House should resolve its-if into a Com mittee, to see whether a Bill of this kind could be en tertained by the House? Lord ELDON said, that no jueicial opinion had been pronounced as to the iglidity of the marriage; l bat the Learned Judge in summing up, put it to the Jury whether, supposing the marriage to be valid or in. valid, force had been used? The Noble Lord, under stood, that the great difficulty in the way of trying the validity in the Ecclesiastical Courts was, that ti e evi elence of the young Lady could not be received there, whilst on the other hand their Lordships might think it admissible ; but if that evidence could be received. although not in that 0 urt, the question for tl.eir Lordships would be simply this—whether they "'Quid or would not in.erfere ? In the case of Wharton v. Campbell, in which the Lady had been taken away by force, the Court decided upon the principle of the statute of Henry VII. and held, that although after the Lady had been forcibly carried off, a marriage might have been entered into, with her full consent, that subsequent consent was not sufficient to quash the previous force. Such a case as that to which their Lordships :men ion was then called, he believed bad never yet been he rd of in a civilized country, or, at least, in a country so highly civilized as En g land. And, provided that their Lordships could satisfy them selves that the Lady's evidence, if given in the Eccle siastical Court, would be sufficient to satisfy that Court, that the marriage was not valid—and if they could sa tisfy themselves that the Ecclesiastical Court would decide that there was no marriage—the question for their Lordships to consider, would be, whether (since, of necessity, various processes should be carried on in the Ecclesiastial Court before there could be a deci sion there) they would or would not, under all the circumstances of the case, then think prophr to bestow more prompt justice? Such was, at least, his view of the subject. The Noble Lord did not care to ex press a decided opinion upon the present cage, but thought that all the circumstances connected with it should be well weighed before the Hone adopted any proceedings upon it. Lord LAUDERDALE was of opinion that their Lordships should consider the expediency of passing a general Act of Parliament, for the purpose of legatsing the evidence of females circumstanced as Miss Turner was. In cases of this sort, where the marriage was produced either by fraud or force, it would be advisable to leave the question with the Ecclesiastical Court.— It would be, indeed, a dangerous proceeding in their Lordships to assume the jurisdiction ef deciding upon points of law. Lord REDESDALEthotight the best way to discuss all these qdestions was in a Committee of the whole - ensceind dto WINS would was then road. and upon the em, was ordered to be referred irole House on Thursday at four THE CORN LAWS. Lord REDESDALE rose, pursuant to notice, to move a series of Resolutions relative to the Corn Laws. There had been, from time to time, various Petitions presented to their Lordships, the presentation of which had elicited . discussions. In 1822, the Noble Lord, (Li verpool), then at the head of the Treasury, deprecated discussion on this subject, and at the same time said, that the C •rn Laws ought to rest on a stable foaada don, that the land owner, and cultivator of land, and all those whose interests were likely to be affected, might enter into their various engagements with confi dence, as to their being able to fulfil them. But if they were one day to adopt one system, • and the mat change it for another, such vacillating comfort would cause even more inconvenience than was, felt under the existing law. He (Lord Redesdale) fully coincided with the wisdom of this suggestion; but since that period, another course had been pursued, and last Ses sion they passed a Bill, whio he designated " a Bill of wrong and robbery," an& aucb it was. This mea sure was passed because theft *ere about 100,000 manufacturers in distress, and the object was to re lieve them by introducing a quantity of foreign corn into the market for the purpose of reducing the price of corn. Now if the amount of Blitish corn, was not i more than sufficient for our consumption,. we were thus precluding so mach British corn from the market; we were dividing 4 or 500,000 quarters amongst twelve , millions of people. But the Public was not the only party wh.) derived benefit, the revenue also participated in it, as would be seen by reference to the duty. That measure was of such a nature, that whatever respect he might before hare felt fit the Noble Lord, he con sideted himself bound to oppose him during the progress of the Bill to which reference had been made. His first Resolution was to the effect, that agrit• shore was the basis of a country's wealth.— Manufactures and population might give a stimulus to agriculture; but he contended that manufactures were a consequence of cultivation. What, for instance, would be the result to this country, if, by any sudden visitation of Providence, it were rendered as barren as the sands of Africa ? The country could not support itself under such circumstances, and there would be a speedy end to commerce and manufactures. He ob jected to these free-trade measures. Had any of their Lordships benefitted by the importation rf foreign wool ? Did they get their coats any cheaper ? Then as regarded leather, when he was young be got shoes at ss. now be paid 17s. for them. Look at the average price of cora after the passing of the Ist of Charles 11. It was low* then than it had been before, and the reason of its beim so was, because agriculture was encouraged, and therel was in consequence a produce of corn be; and the Cols. sumption. In Sweden there hrd been a duty imposer{ almost amounting to prohibition, and the result was a lower price. That which we produced within ourselves cost us, in one sense, nothing ; but that which we imported must cost us something. He knew there had been considerable distress, but what was the cause? A Noble Lord (Liverpool) had ex ' plained the cause—it was owing to an excess of mono.' facture to a con‘iderab'e extent—to a desire to grow sudd. nly rich. This at least was one of the causes. to which he would add machinery, which enabled one was to do what before required ten. It was worthy of con. sideration that, some seasons the produce did not amount to more than half what it did in others. Was it reasonable then to suppose that the agriculturist could always afford to sell at one price? But the prices were in this country more steady than in others ; be supposed owing to our superior skill. He thought it must be evident that if foreign corn were imported, purchased abroad at the most favourable times, to be introduced here, after perhaps a most unfavourable season, the market here could never rise above sixty shillings. What was the effect of this? The farmer in bad seasons must suffer great losses; and in plentiful ones there would be an excess, which ought to be allowed to supply the deficiency of the bad season. The farmer must there fore be a loser in both cases. Formerly the farmer sold immediately to the consumer : but now he sold to the corn-dealers. of whom th.re were numbers, even in every little market town ; and the consequence was, that the farmer did not obtain so good a price. He concluded, that to compare the price of corn now with what it used to be, was errone us. The consumption had increased materially for the last hundred years; and if this were considered, it would be found that corn was the cheapest article of food we had. We did not tax the agticulturists as we did other classes. We taxed them to give others peculiar advantages. We imposed ' a low duty on the importation of wool, to enable the manufacturer to possess a cheaper raw material. He be. Heves,. however, that the exportation of woollens had, since the period of change in this resper, rather dimi nished. Now what would be the effect of the Bill which had come up from the commons? If the produce was equal to the consumption, the farmer would have to pay the duty that might be paid for the importation of .foreign corn, and thus a new land tax was created. What would be the effect as regarded Ireland? Irish corn imported paid no duty. Suppose one m.llion quar ters were sent from Ireland; if that intr notation were checked, it would add much to the distress of that country. The poor's rates were a great source cf op pressiou to the farmers, and caused them to grudge every penny they pa.d for labour, because of their want of capital. By discouraging the farmer, then, instead of having a few manufact urers out o f employ, we should have an increase of crime, an addition to our poor's rates, and a falling off in our agriculture..-. There was another subject of great importance, namely, how far would the Constitution of his Ma jesty's Government bs affected by such a measure? The Government of this country was founded in land; even in the other House, the qualification was land. Po litical power should be given to property ; because the physical power on the side of those who had not pro. perty. was much greater than of those who had it. What was the language used in another place? They avowed that their object was to reduce the value of land. This was the language of the Capitalists, and. of the Fundholders; who would run away with tie property of the country, and leave the Landholder to shift for himself. This House, then, could not stand unless its interests were preserved, and it was the prop and stay of the country. When we had been engaged i n a heavy war, we had incurred taxes to a considerable amount, and was it to be supposed we could then com pete with nations which bad not such burdens' The in structions' which were riven to Mr. Jacob were of • most partial description--(Hear, hear)--and it was protecting , tural Interest, as the basis of our prosperity. Lord GODERICH thought it world be considered most discreet and proper if 'he abstained from dlio cussing the Resolutions, when the discussion on the Bill itself stood for Friday neat. The Resolutions were of so wide a nature. that if he endeavoured to answer them, he feared he should exhaust his etiwn strength, and at the same time exhaust the patience of their Lordships. The Bill he should leave to move the second reading of on Friday, was a practical measure on which their Lordships would come to a con clusion, Aye or 'No ' • but these propositions were an Essay on Political Economy. They contained, ton, numerous affirmations with which their Lordships might sot coincide; and the consequence would be. that if their Lordships differed fuom them in one particular, they must reject the whole, for the whole comprised a series, which it was necessary t preserve entire, or the conclusion to which such series led would not be borne out. There was a misrepresentation as to the Act of ,Charles 11. which took care not only to impose no duty on Foreign wool, but to confine the consumer ,don of English wool to this country alone--(Hear). Attempts were made to class his opinions with those of Mr. M'Culloch; but he was not a subscriber to the doctrines of that Gentleman, nor to those of any other Political Economist ; he was not one of those addiettts jurare ire veibis. Oat of the Resolutions went to declare that any trade in corn was injurious, because it exported oar circulating medium. But this was at variance with the evidence already before their Lordships, from which it appeared that corn was not necessarily paid fsr in gold; supposing it was. it did not necessarily follow that such payment was pre judicial to the interests of the country. He would state [ the reason for his conclusion. In 1826 there were im - ' ported, he believed, more than two millions of quarters, the value of which he should estimate at two millions sterling. During the whole of that year the exchange was so much in favour of this country, that gild was the l worst article the foreigner could have impor:ed coat for. It did so happen that there were imported in that year, into the Mint, two millions of sovereigns ; this nes ver could have taken place if the exchange had bail such as to render it prejudicial to export gold for the sake of obtaining corn. 1111824 and 1825 the exchange was more unfavourable, owing to different causes; but he could assert that in those years not a sovereign went to Datintic nor any other port for corn ;on the coirrat y, all the sovereigns which went away in casks to the Bank •of France came back in 1826 in the sanse casks, with out their having been open: d. Objections were made in the Resolutions to free trade. What was meant by free tradeß What he meant was, not that importation should be allowed without any duty, but that the defect in our policy Oiled prohibition should be got rid of. Thinking that he ought to oppose the motion, he had intended to move the previous question ; but as the object of the Noble Lard was that their Lordships should go into a Committee, he (Viscount Goderich) would move as an amendment that their Lordships do - now adjourn. The Earl of LAUDERDALE paid a high tribute of, praise to the id:Wines and deep research which his Noble and Learned Fiend had displayed in the speech by which be had introduced his Resolutions, the stray sense and propriety of which would do eternal honoat to the House if they were inserted on its Journals. The Noble Earl then took a view of their nature, and de fended the political doctrines which they were intended to inculcate. Lord BEXLEY contended that the rapid increase of property subsequently to 1773 was a complete proof of the beneficial effects of the alteration then introduced. Lord ROSSLYN said, that though the law permitted the importation of cora at the period alluded to by the Noble Lord, there was a practical difficulty opposed to its operation, from the circumstances in which Europe was then situated. If the increase of population was to be attributed to a change in the Corn Laws, he feared the Noble Lord pressed more circumstances into his service than bore upon the question. The Earl of STANHOPE, after condemning any change in the lays which would depreciate the landed interest, recommended his Noble Friend to be satisfied with laying his resolutions on the table, and not divide the House, as another opportunity would occur in which the question would be more fully discussed. Lord REDESbALE replied, and said, he would not press their Lordships to a division. The amendment was then put and carried, and their Lordships adjourned at a QuAirrza scions &Aviv. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Home was engaged in !mantling for a Committee to try the merits of the Electioa for the county uf Limerick till a quarter to fire eciock. CATHOLIC CLAIMS. Mr. CA RT W RIG Wipre;n teiTa fedi - doe from the Minister, Churchwardens, and inhabitants of Weldon, to tbe county of Nor champion, melon any further concession_ to the Boman Catboilcav Ordered to Ile upon the table. General PEACHRY presented a similar Petitiva from Taunton. signed by 'l,l/10 preens, the Hon. Member said, of high honour sad indisputable virtue. Thai was a wide difference, he submitted to the Hous e , between giving men religious liberty and political power. sts principtie bad been the wlsensizies of our ancestors • and his (the Hun. Member's) wee iselatwats Issas Aseicit esesteri. LINIUUCL (e0111tTY) summit count:viz. The redosed list of this Committee was brought op by Mr. Drsow and the fo ll owing Members sworn at the table—J. F. Lambert Esq. Lord Viscount Clements, Sir A. Chichester A. Sanderson, Esq. H. Bright ' Esq. W. Wyndham, Esq . F. Rosritio. con, Esq. Lord Viscount Mandeville, G. W. Posterns, Esq. J. Campbell, WA. W. Marshall, Esq. R. Gordon. Seq. M. Fitzgerald, Esq. W. B. Wrightson, Esq. and F. Gye, Esq. NAST AND CODDDRATION ACiIL Petitions for the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts were presented by Sir H.. 1. Coos% from a Congregation of Protestant Dissenters in London ; by Mr. Paanaaves, from Penzanee; by Colonel CAVSNDMI, from a Congregation of Protestant Dissenters in Derby ; by Mr. STAIIIXT, from another Congregation in the same place • and by Mr. Poo:zero. from the Protestant Dissen ters of H inckley, la Gloucestershire—which were severally reed and ordered to tie open the table. Mr. BRAUMONT said, that 11;;;;;;;Friday last announced his intention of sahmitting a motion to the House, upon the state of the Administration of the country, be now rose for the purpour of giving notice, that on Thursday next he should move the fol lowing Resolution " That the Administration, as It is at present constituted, is not worthy et the confidence of this House." Mr. TIERNEY, la consequence of the notice just given, would suggest to his Hon. Friend opposite, who had a motion on the piper for Thursday, which would be entitled to priority, that it might contribute greatly to the convenience of the House, it he would noose ma* other day for by motion ; and be thought he could absent promise that Thursday stennight should be made "len for him. Mr. DAVENPORT replied, that although he did not think sy motion could be of greater lenpartance than that of which 'be had given notice; (for a Select Cannatnee to inquire into the I .A L % l sot reject niche* Oanatag that 94 1111 110 1 .0 Man. the begianioi to cod, he Naked*. astika hie coo motion of W ciar hic a : y ver of w th ey e I he imp vie ona we n a ce t : a pr ew atect7o n g b th w e A b g e ric "a ull to a Com • shined it equally mischievous. fse Noble lord con. lur o'clock. eluded, with moving his Resolutions, which were de- pimp If netlemel &wet) sa, la !gimlet, le eetesimaatt @Wm the oenveniesee et the amen he would secede to the p ro . peal et the Et& Bea. Geetlethep. We. Tin/MY. having lei Ewe &elm pledged bistielf t• Heemeehle M, bet. eillp redeem hit pledge by impa li n g wpm the oceembesinien of anodised bis Hw Prisons. n i Huh Oendenem motto, oho Ind a needed for Timony l en, eight i who vapid perhaps consent to postpone it tin the sam dap the feliele_hs week. Mr. P. BUXTON assented. sod seesedinply extended the mks or Isle ntotiorm the nattiest of Hindoe Beam iu m4ar the Soh, to Thursday the 514 tenant. MRNage elan MC LOOMS. A Kemp how the Lords announced the couturrebee of the Lordships In several Private Hills, and *shed have for H. H a , cock, Meg. a Member or this House, to attend and give ',olei c * before a Canaanite of Privileges it the House et L ir a oci ties Roscommon Peerage. The SPEAKER replied, that the Howe would retire an venue! by Messengers of Its own. Stave rasa: Hr. CANNING laid upon t►e tank copies of earrevema is , 4 relative to the 21w/evade in I 446 an 4 1427. WOOL TUADIL Mr. PORTMAN gave notice, that on the nth of Ray he ghost present a Petition from the Landowners of Dorsetshire, and wooht Ellen call the atomise of the House to the subject of the wool trade ISA 110/0 11141CTION. Mr. MONCIE restated a Pethinn tom W. H. Hall, B eif Please of the Borough d Reading, complaining that many ms had voted at the lam Rieetion who were not qualified; and praying the Home to adopt sons norms d preventing a recurrence duck wakes at fame Nisaksa. The 1111111111 Han. M. 11.20. reStOttd Petition from the Inhabit: uses e x needing and its Vicinity, for the abolition of eke practice of blaming Widows in India.—Ordeeed to be open the taw, and to be printed. lord MILTON promoted a Pidde . a frogll fie fens of Miro; Is Yorialdre, praying for someone's., mode than the law farina d of recovering small debts. Mt. BANKER named that there be laid before the Houle, a Copy ed the Lease granted to his late Royal Highness the Duke of Yost, of the site of Godolphin Hesse. SA ST nom SYBIL Petitioca were presented in ramie id a more free trade with In. die, by Lord StA/ILIT, from the hlambeater Chamber of Coot. mem; by the name Noble Lord from Blackburn ; by Sir Walarramer from Wolverhampton; by Lord MILTON from lAAa and from Halifax; by Mr. DOSIBALS, from Birmingham; and by Mr. Bram from the Shipowners and Merchants of Moon. spet.Hell. Mr. W. WHITMORE rose lee the purpose of bring. ing forward the important motion of which he had given notice ; it was impossible to see the distress of the country, the want of demand for our manufactures, the falling off in the Revenue. which amounted in the last year to between four and five millions, and the diminu tion of our commerce, which if estimca I by the amount of exports, was also between four and five millions, it was impossible to see without great alarm, the progress of national distress which went on continually intim ing, which bad engaged the particular attention of a Committee of that House, now sitting upon the subject of Emigration, and which, according to their report, extended not only to the Weavers, but to every other portion of the industrious class. In these circumstan• ces they were bound to seek the means of relieving the industrious part of the community, who had acquired even a new claim to their attention and their sympathy from the patience with which they had sustained their sufferings. He did not, however, bring forward his promised motion under the fluence of temporary motives. It was founded upon his mature and unchangeable opinions, and if he could offer, as he believed he could, sound and unaa• swerable reasons in favour of his opinions, he hoped his motion would be listened to by the House. He did not rest his motion upon the depression which now pre. wailed, and which he hoped and believed was only of a temporary nature, but whoever reflected upon the ge. neral state of the country, upon the present magnitude of its debt, and upon the wars in which it would here. after in all probability be compelled to engage, mist feel with him the necessity of exercising by every po • Bible means the natural resources, must feel anxious to lighten the springs of industry, to afford every envoi ragement to trade, and thus to augment the wealth, and by augmenting the wealth, to increase the power of the country. Let them look back to that portion of the Empire, the interests of which was the perpetual subject of discussion in that House, and if they did not then feel the necessity of doing all that was possible to encourage trade, they took indeed a very narrow and imperfect view sf the subject. To moderate religious differences would do much, but it would not do all fir that portion of the Empire. It was highly necessary to encourage the people of Ireland in that course of ma aufacturing industry upon which he believed they had entered. This was above all things necewkey, if they wished to insure their peace, happiness, and prosperitY. In considering how these objects might best be accom plished, it was impossible not to look at the policy, the dangerous and mischievous policy of the Corn Leese The most pernicious restrictions had fettered that branch of trade ever since 1815, and were to a great degree continued by the Bill lately paned through that House, and now probably about to receive the sanction of the other House of Parliament. Whatever benefits might be supposed in other respects to flow from this system, it must be admitted to have the effect of vatting us of from a great portion of the trade we might otherwise enjoy with Europe and Monica. In adopting this system we had acted in violation of all sound principles, in op position to the plainest dictates of justice and common sense. Its necessary effect was to reduce the mow lactates of this country, 'and encourage those of Ice reign nations, It lost us the markets of the northers parts of Europe, of Germany, of Belgium, and of the United States of America. But this Bill had passed this House and would probably become a law, it becalm then necessary to inquire whether means did not still exist in the power of the country to counteract, at least in some degree, the evils we had thus brought upon ourseleee—whether in 'a part of our own empire (h e meant India) we might not find the means of nation and redress for the injuries thus indicted? The House need not be told that previous to the year 1814 an entire monopoly of this trade was possessed by the East India Company ; nor that by the renewal of the Charter, in that year, the monopoly of the CoolpaeY was invaded, except so far as regarded the trade with China. At that time great difference of opinion re' Tailed; and it was held by many that no considerable extension of the trade was possible. They urged the poverty of the people, their habits and prejadices-- - even their religious opinions were dwelt on, as likely to counteract the vivifying influence of commercial freedom. It was never dreamt that the cotton trade could be materially advanced, or that a great demand could grow up for the other staple manufactures of this couto try. It was thought that perhaps there might be a smell additional export of woollen goods,aod of a new article. of luxury; but that we should largely import raw produce of India growth, and send it back to India in a.mattufactuted state, was what nobody conceived. It was indeed an extraordinary achievement of manefac curing and commercial energy and skill that England. where tie wages of labour is seven tinsel as dear as Of • ttr 110 6 Aw Eby Pd 2: taa INN Etee Ehis road Ina with whit Fast the a aver low& Two crew thei ea t that picp3 this Prior farsi • tat aati bag : • 're 0 rice P' - a g ree drr Id ple aIEI was N< oafs 26, * ng wit 1a the .01 yn tail *ghi wet lity e w the d tl ad, t re Pull Id 4 . 4 dy, ad, P O P aci 4. Pe oogl .d a tea a HI t Pre the Cc e. libh ar eat Pr 114: ly c ehi be CI is I. Cam ade ... ~.