Star. — London, England, 1820-07-08 00:00:00

Vision 'BM, which was read the Sr& time, and ordered to be rat the second time en Monday. Lord ALTHORPE wished to know from an Honourable Gentleman opposite, if k was his intention to follow up the motion which he bad already brought before the House, foe an amendment of the Usury Laws ? Agreeing, as he did, with the Honourable and Learned Gentleman, be was induced to ask this question from the anxiety which he felt for the success of the measure. Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW said, that it had been his firm in- 1 tention to introduce a measure on the subject this Session, but that was prevented by the events in which the House had been recently so much engaged. He had the satisfaction to state, that he wo'ild certainly bring it forward at an early opportunity next Session. The New Street Act Bill was read a third time and passed. The Exchequer Bills Public Works Bill Was ordered to be read the third time on Monday next. The Navy Prize Money Bill was read the second time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. _ _ ----- Lord JOHN RUSSELL gave notice that h• would, early in the next Session, move for leave to bring in a Bill for the abolition of the punishment of Transportation in cases of Libel. BANK NOTES. Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH said he held in his hand. a Petition from Mr. Alexander Tillssch, an ingenious and scien tific person. The Petitioner, in 1797, presented to the Bank of England a Plan for the prevention, or at least to render ex tremely difficult, the forgery:it their Notes. The Bank, how eve?, rejected the Plan ; but the Commissioners, appointed in the year 1819, had since approved of that very Plan which in 1797 had been thus rejected by,the Banh ; and it was now to be acted upon by the Bank as the invention of another person. The Petitioner compl= of the provisions of a Bill now before the House for the . prevention of Forgeries, as tend ing to affect the free extras! of the art,of engraving. But if the Bill should pass into a law, the Petitiaiser prayed for remu neration.—The Petition was read and ordered to be printed. The following is a copy of the Petition s " TO THZ /HZ CO)(XOI$ 01 111 UNIT= ILINGIIO3I or CBr.Ar BRITAIN AND laztaign, is nagullAninT AIIIB3[BLZW-1158 ormin.r rEriTiox or ALExAsina iimoam, or lininGinll, " Sorwrro—That in the year Or your Petitioner presented to the Bank of England a Specimen of a Plan of Engraving. calculated to prevent the Forgery of Dank Notes, accompanied ith a Certificate signed by Messrs. Francis Bartikoxii, Wilms Lowry, Thomas Holloway, James Heath, William Blimp, James Fittler, William Byrne, J. Laughter, James Desire, end other eminent engravers, stating, each fur himself, that 'tier, e. , uld not make a copy of it,' and that 'they did led believe that' it could be copied by any of the kMOII I II arts of engraving sod recommending it to the notice of the Bank of FAtgland, as so art of great merit and ingenuity, calculated not merely to detect, but to 'weevil the Forgery of Bank Notes. " 'llia the said Specimen was executed in consequence of a written permission from Mr. Giles, then Governor of the Bank, and on a verbal promise froni hint, that yoer Petitioner should be well remunerated by the Bank if his Specimen could not be copied, and at all events be paid for his trouble and expenses. " That the Bank Engraver (then a Mr. Terry) said he could c•sp‘s it, and in about three months thereafter did produce what he called a copy, but which was, in fact, very unlike the original. " That on the 4th of July, 1797, the said pretended copy was e-:arnined before a Committee of the flank Directors, by Messrs. heath, Byrne, Sharp, Fittler, Landseer, and Lowry, ail lib grAveri of the first eminence, who all declared that the pre tended copy was not anything like a correct resemblance of the original, nor even executed in the sante manner, your Peti- Corer's Speen:am being executed on and printed from a block in the manner of letter-press, but the copy executed on and printed from a copper-plate in the common rolling-press; and the said Engravers glutted certificates to that effect, and gave the same to your Petitioner; and the other Engravers who were not at the liaak when the examination was made, afterwards compared the pretended cony, and gave your retitiuner a cenifi este similar to the last-mentioned—all agreeing that the copy was no more -like the original, than a brass counter like a guinea " That. notwithaandivg of these certificates, the ralok re jected the plan offered by yoar Petitioner, foliowrd their old plan for upwards of twenty years larger, trusting to the infliction of punishments fur thgit protection, and that of the Public, of the effects of which your Petitioner will say nothing—and never paid your Petitioner any remuneration fur his expenses and trouts*, both of which had been considerable. " That on the appointment of a Royal Commission in the year 1818, to examine and report flu the best means for the pre •antion of :orgery, your Petitioner laid before the said Commis sioners the forenientioned Specimen, accompanied with another executed for the purpose and exhibiting some improvement; and st aed to them, that, not being a professional Artist, these Specimens (notwithstanding their certified merit) could give but an imperfect idea of the perfection of which your Petitioner's a/ was susceptible. " That th said Commissioners, from many specimens olTered by different iinlividuals, recommended the adoption of one offered by a Mr. Applegarth. " That the said plan of the said Mr. Applegarth is, as your Petitioner has been informed and believes, in fact, the sante with at.d differs not in the principle of execution hem the plan ofTe7ed by your Petitioner twenty-three yrars ago; and there fore the preference thereto given appears to your Petitioner to be an act of great injustice towards him, the original inventor. " That your Petitioner has sees a Bill now before your, jionourable House, entitled,' A for the further prevention of Forging and Coucterfeiting of Dank Notes,' in which there are various clauses calculated, and, as your Petitioner humbly submits, intended to prevent him from exercising in any way that art of which he was the original inventor; and which, he humbly submits, is an act of great injustice. 't That to prohibit the exercise of any modes of Engraving, on the pretext of preventing forgery,- stands as much opposed to the progress and improvement of the Arts, and is consequently as impolitic as it would be to prohibit die sinking for nwalals, buttons, and many branches of metallic ornament, ou pretext of hindering the current coin from being imitated and counterfeited. " Your Petitioner therefore humbly submits, that the said Bill, containing such ekes's, should not be passed into a law; or if deemed indispeumble on groluids respecting which he may not be qualified to judge, that year Petitioner ought previously to receive such a remuneration as to the wisdom of your Ho. nourable House may appear reasonable; not only for the great trouble and expense he hoe already incurred, but for the damage and loss which your Petitioner must incur if prevented. from exercising that very art of whits be was the original inventor, and from the exercise of which he desisted an these years, only in the hope that the Dank et illeidood would, Donner or later, adopt it, and which they have irese,"bet gives the credit et it to another person, and, consaineady the remuneration And ad vantage arising from its adoption. " Your Petitioner therefore humbly prays that his case may be taken into consideration, and that be may be granted such relief in the premises as this Honourable House in its wisdom may deem meet. (Signed) N ALEXANDER TILLOCH." SUSPENSION OF THE CORONATION. Mr. BEAUMONT rose to give' notice that he I. would, on Tuesday next, move for an humble• A ddress to his Majesty, praying that he would be gra ciously pleased to give directions for the suspension of the ceremony of the Coronation, until after the termination of the proceedings now pending against her Majesty the Queen. He hoped that his Majesty would supersede the necessity of such a measure. Lard CASTLEI4 . EAGH begged to inform the Hon.; that it had been his intention to originate a motion himself tor the postponement of that cere mony indefinitely, but that it could be made here— after. The answer which he had given, on a former night, to a questi , n put to him on this subject, was founded on the impression, that the period during which the proceedings against her Majesty would be suspended, in order to enable her to collect wit nesses for her defence, would be of sach extent, that there could be uo occasion for altering the day for which the ceremony was originally fixed. But her Maje s ty . having demanded an immediate trial, made it neces sary to vary the time of the Coronation. Mr. BEAUMONT was heartily glad to find that such was the Noble Lord's intention ; and he re garded the voluntary postponement of the ceremony ' by Millisteri, as as evidenca.of dslir w4th ant to paw judice the esty. bar libj Lord CialtrATi li tished that it might , distinctly understood, that the motives of the pose. ponement were-not in the remotest degree connected with the proteedinp against her Majesty. Mr. LAMBTON wished to know if it was the in tention of Ministers to g o on with the proceedings against her Majesty CM Monday nest? Lord CASTLEREAGH said, he thought this was thcfirst time that a Member of that House was re ferred to for information with respect to the proceed ings that were intended to be adopted by the other. INCOME or THE DONE OP /ORR. Mr. HUME moved, " That there be laid before' the HoUse a Return of the whole of the Income re:' ceived by his Royal Highness the Duke of York; arising from his Civil and Military Employment 4, and the other sources of Income, since the year 1800." He moved this, on the ground that similar Returns had been made for all the other Members of the Royal Family, and he was sure there would be no objection. Lord CASTLEREAGH objected to the motion, as he entirely disapproved of the motives which alone could originate such a motion. Mr. HUME spurned the imputation of unworthy motives. He repeated, that he moved for Returns with respect to the Duke of York, such as had been furnished with respect to every other Member of the Royal Family. Mr. HUSKISSON thought there was no ground stated for the motion. All the grants which had been made -to the. Duke of York were contained in different Acts of Parliament, and if the Hon. Mem ber would take the trouble to look over these Acts, he would there obtain the information which he sought. Mr. N. CALVERT thought that the motion -was very proper, in case that the Duke of York came be fore the House as a claimant ; but otherwise he did not think it ought to be pressed. Mr. HUME said, the motion had reference to an ulterior object, u bleb in could not propose to the House without the intbrmation he now sought. The Douse was about to proceed to a division, when the Hon. Member withdrew his motion. GRANTHAM ELECTION PETITION.-.-.-CONTELIPT OF THE SPEAKER'S WARRANT. The SPEAKER took that opportunity to inform the House, that agreeably to its orders, one of the Serjeant's Messengers had been dispatched from town to take into custody Sir William Manners, Mr. Hugh Manners, and Armstrong Jarvis, and that he had re turned and was in readiness to attend at the Bar, and state the result of his mission- Wright, the Messenger, was then called to the Bar, and stated, that he had yesterday set out, ip pursuance of the order of that House, to the residence of Sir William Manners and Mr. Hugh Manners, at Buckminster ; and that, having seen a person who ~ .- a ted himself to be the Steward of Sir William Man ners, he, in answer to his (Wright's) questions, stated, that neither Sir William Manners nor Mr. Hugh Manners was at home ; that the former rode out that • mot fling, but whither he did not know. He (Wright) then skewed to the Steward the warrant of the Speaker, and asked him to write down the answer which he had just given, .which he immediately agreed to do. He {Wright) then asked about A;r: m strong Jarvis, but the Steward referred him to a pub lic-house, at a little distance, where he made inquiries, but could get no information about him.—The Mes-, senger then withdrew. Two affidavits were then read, one from the Stew ard, and the second from another person residing in • 'Btickminster, to shew that Sir Williath Manners was not to be found. Sir ROBERT HERON said, that as due notice of attendance bad been formally served on Sir William Manners, and as he had not come, he was guilty of o gross violation of the authority of the House. He should, therefore, move—" That an humble Address he presented to his Majesty, praying that he would be graciously pleased to issue a Proclamation, offer- • ing a reward for the apprehension of Sir William Manners and Armstrong Jarvis." The •SI'EA KER observed, that the regular .mode • would be to submit a ltesolution in the first instance, hewing that Sir William Mangers had disobeyed the order of the House, and then to move the Address. The following Resolutions were then put and agreed to unanimously : • " Itcsolvcd—That it appears to tbis House, that Sir William %meta has absconded to avoid being taken into custody by an Order of the house. . _ _ " Resolved—illat an humble Addresi be presented to his Majesty, praying that lie would be graciously pleased to issue a Procknoation, offering a reward for the applehension of Sir William Manners." • •Similar itesolutions were agreed to in the case of Armstrong Jarvis. to ISTI STILLS. General HART briefly called the attention of the Chancellor of the Exchequer to a measure which had been proposed in the course of the last Session: Je specting Irish Stills, and took occasion to adv to' an improved engine for the rectifying a spirits. . The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, lie intended to give notice of a motion which would embrace the subject generally. Lord MOUNTCHARLES wished to know from the Right Hon. the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if it was his intention that the Bill proposed in the cow- se of the last Session for establishing a Police Regula tion to prevent illicit distillation in Ireland, should have effect, or if he meant to propose another mea sure on the subject ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that no delay should take place in realising the object adverted to by the Noble Lord. • • AUDIT OFFICE AT LISBON. Mr. BEN 7.1; ETT commented on the manner in which the Audit Office was conducted, particularly that branch of it established at Lisbon. In his opinion, no, advantage whatever had resulted from that Office, and he could not but complain that the evidence re specting it had been suppressed.—After shortly ad verting to the Finance Committee, the Honourable Member moved—" That there be laid before the House, Accounts of all Monies paid for Auditing the Peninsular Accounts, with an Account of the Nunf ber of Accounts audited." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER dif fered entirely from the Honourable Member ; for, in his opinion, very great advantage had accrued to the public interest from the labours of the different per sons-connected with the Audit Office. The zeal and industry of the Committee was not to be surpassed. Mr. BEgNETT was patticularly anxious that the of the evidence should be produced, because Mantes ~Iseiliew they would diselose a scene of squabbles and contentions for patronage, both at the Office in Whitehall and elsewhere, which were in themselves 11104 disgraceful, and buteht to be ptft an end to as soon u possible. It was the duty of the Right Hon. the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as having been the principal in the inquiry, to auismit the.evidenee to the House. If, however, the Right Hon. Gentleman should still persist in withholding it, he (Mr. Bennett) should feel it his duty to move for it formally. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER de; . nied that he was the o ffi cial organ of the Committee. The motion was then agteed to. Mr. BENNETT espresso il his intention of making a Motion on the subject of the evidence on Wednesday. MAIN BILL. Lord tASTLEREAGH moved the Order of the Day for the second reading of this NIL Mr. BERNAL opposed the Bill, and contended, l that before he could bring himself to accede to it, he. should desire to see a strong case made out. The Bill against Aliens had in the first instance originated from the machinations of foreigners. It -was with that view that the 33d of the late King had been enacted. But no machinations now existed to render Such a Bill necessary, - and it was calculated to op press and injure numerous individuals whohad claims on our protection. It was contrary to the enlightened principles of the age, and altogether at variance with that liberality which induced this - country to grant an asylum to the fugitives who- sotight it upon the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. With this decided conviction upon his mind, he should move an Amend ment—" That the Bill be read this day six months." Lord ARCHIBALD HAMILTON supported the AMendment, and wished to know from the Noble Lord, if he intended this Bill as the first of a series of permanent measures against Aliens? In his opi nion, the Bill was equally unnecessary and unjust. It had been continued from year to year, almost as a matter of course, advantage being taken of' the corn= parative indifference with - which the House lookei at what professed to be a tereporarylreasure. In the same manner, the Act for the Seizure of Arms ; in- Ireland had been continued for ten years, by flee At; tinct renewals. This Alien Law.also had been lid* continued for five or six years since the peace, aril wassnow to be continued for two years longer,- at' se end of which time, it was likely to be justas oeceis sary as it was now, for not a single : 3r.gument heft been adduced in favour OE it—(Hear), • Colonel DAVIES said, it was twenty-seven - years . ago that an Alien Bill had beets first introduced into the House, on a necessity said, and with some reasons to be a strong one; it had afterwards been renewed on less and less distinct grounds; and it was now at last proposed, in all its naked enormity, without any reason; for what was said about the revolutionary resolutions prevalent on the Continent, was a mere mockery—an experiment tried by the Noble Lord (Castlereagh) to see how far he could prevail on the credulity of the House. When foreign Govern ments heard that our army had been increased by 11,000 men in time.of peace, to prevent * the spread of revolutionary doctrines, and that even this was not available without new laws, they might, indeed, be warranted in. shutting out Englishmen from their shores; but for the exclusion of foreigners from Eng land there was not the slifhtest reason. The Bill was so utterly inconsistent with humanity and policy, that he could not help expressing his strong disap probation of it.—The question having been pat, and a division having been called for, Mr. J. W. WARD said, that though it was un pleasant to continue a debate on which no arguments had been offered but on one side, the Bill was, in his opinion, so discreditable to Ministers, so discredit able to the House, and so discreditab'e to the coun try, that he could not help. saying a few words against it; and the more so, because he thought it , was only by the earnestness, zeal, and perseverance of the opposition to it, that the country could eveer be delivered from this measure, and that they had thus far to congratulate themselves, that it was on account of that opposition that they had not a per petual, instead of a two years Alien Bill (Hear, hear). It was a Bill to deprive foreigners of that degree of favour - and countenance which, they enjoyed in this country—he would not say, in ancient times, for that might admit of dispute, but, without question, in that time of our history to w hi c h e ver y man lo oked back with most satisfaction, and which might hem. conveniently taken as an example. He really could not understand, after all that had been said on the subject, on what reasons were offered to, them, this Bill, which, might *affect the interests, and which af fected so directly the character of the country— (Hear, hear!)—Was it for the protection of our own Government, or was it for the protection of foreign Governments? When it was last proposed to them, two years ago, they were told that Europe was still CP ver-rua with Jacobins, some Republicans) some Na poleonists, all mischievous in the extreme; they were told to look at the Netherlands, where, till an Alien Bill had been introdUced, the work Of sedition hid been carried on , by Wholesale, by these pestilent ene mies of all established authority. -After that, what had happened? In that very year, many of those exiles were recalled to France, and jn.the next year the King of France, the head of that Government which *e were professing to protect be . that Bill, said his wish was to forgive and forget, and suff almost all the others of these exiles to return to their country. He did not say this to throw any discredit on the course then pursued ' ; but it was manifest that the firmest ground had thus been cut from under the feet of the supporters of the Bill. He did notintenct to criticise the acts of the French Government, which it would be most unbecoming to do in that House; but it was plain, that if any machinations were car ried on against the French Government, it was in France itself, 'in Path, in the Electoral Colleges, or in the Chamber of Deputies--(Hear, hear.t).--To pre vent Jacobins from coming here, 'was merely to for bid them to come to a place where they would not come, if they intended to act decidedly, and with ef fect—(Hear, hear!).--The whole weight of the mea sure was thus throven on those who should be pro tected from it—on those who came hither from cu riosity or on business, and who were the very persons whom every one would wish to put under the pro tection of the law, and to relieve from the operation of an arbitrary measure—(Hear!)—He freely con fessed he was what was commonly called an Alarmist, that looked with !bitch apisteheniion fo the attenr, ,- , of Jacobins on the institutions of this country. but of what Jacobins? Of foreign Jacobins ? Certainl y not. He should as soon dread competition With our cotton goods or our hardware, as with our Jacobins—. (A leugh)—unfortunately our own manufacture wets a great deal too plentiful and too perfect —;A larti,)h) —the article Jacobin, in this country, was mole in veterate, stubborn, and atrocious, than any that could be supplied to us—it was composed of at:ad old luglish stuff l—(A lane, and Hear, hear).— here was the less danger on that score, because there ter• tainly was no nation that so disliked the interference of foreigners in their concerns as y•e did. • When we rebelled againgt our King and murdered him, ".e did it without foreign interference—when we recalled • his son, we did It Whhoet foreign interference—when we eixted his other son, 4:.: did it with a very little foreign interference—Wear! front the Mini:fella benches)—but then the current of ti.e opinion of Oef people was• only turned for a tim to flow agate more strongly in its old channel—(ied . ; hear)—for our antes ors had been anxious, even to an excess, t, get rid of the foreign force e Itich had aided King William. If he (Mr. Ward) had the talents and the disposition to attempt the overthrow of the Govern ment, he was so convinced of the feeling of the people respecting Aliens, that if he knew there were any number of foreign Jacobins in London ready to join him in his attempt either to dethrone the King, or plunder the aristocracy, or murder the clergy, be would say to them, that •' though I thank you for your neighbourly disposition, I must beg you to be .still, for-even reason and justice will in this country be contaminated by your interterence:' As a striking , proof or the feelings of the people tin this head, it was well known to-every Member-of the House, that there was scarcely a company we could get into, et this moment, in which the question was not started, " Will the people of Etigland believe foteign evi dence ?"—(Hear, hear).—l-le . did riot mean to decide on the _question whethei foreign evidence snouts' be credited; but surely the nation, wheie a ! pes-. Lion could - be - 'mooted Whether any foreigner was to. be billeted .on his oath, was.not in great danger from the influence of strangers—(Hear, hear, hear). Thelaerwas, there Was no danger of foreign i Wu enee where the higher Classes were true to weir alle-- glance. The higher clai.i.es,. from then opportunities of intercourse-with other. nations, had their animosi ties. rubbed doyen; but the lower classes, arid the• classes between the higher anti .bel)s< co, ere those w'hichretained national prejudices in 41 their strength and sharpness. • - This country .. ay, more than ally other nation, separated from its neighbours by those prejlidieet ! land aCcordin g ly t amongq Its, conatcoon with foreign enemieshad always hem all aristocrati cal offence. • In the reigns of Queen Elizi , ..seth .ii!d James, the personi who leagued themselves with io rrigners.were Nobles, and men of fce tune ; in the time of the Jacobite conspiracies, the persons con cerned were all of it certain tank. But what was the character of the dissensioi,s which now afflicted this. country? Thtiy might be characterised as disvnte 2 'between the higher and the lower orders. D uring; the last few months, the etarnry had been harassed by plots a•-d conspiracies, compared with the object Of which, any ordinary change in Government, any ' changein Religion that bad ever, at any former tit c, been contemplated, such as a change from Catholic to Prose t int, from Fliscopalian t ) Dissenting, as trifling—(Hear !).—A destruction of all Religion and all Government had been aimed at, the most perni cious ends had been pursued by the foulest mea n Revolution through murder and assass;- (Hear, hear!).—But no foreign interii be traced; yet they had now a Bill pm the Provisional Committee at Glasgow . Liberals, and the LI! a -gents in Yorkshit Students, or the Conspirators in Cate.street leonists—(Hear, hear).—This was a , (Rear)—paltry, because it was founded sertions—paltry, because it contradicted ings of the count; y—paltry, because it pi those who could not even complain—(Hi It was not, he was sorry to say, very . But that it was popular, was a reason why of Commons should not pass it. The lived it because they hated foreigners, bi of foreigners made such a Bill useless. to it because it was discreditable and so unnecessary, that those who asked . hardly give a reason for k—(Hear, hem could - conceive no other motive for it I those who had got power, no matter over by what means, would retaia it as long without danger=(Hear, h:ar). The LORD MAYOR 1 tid he rose to observations which had been made _ night, on his conduct in calling for military .ference—(Order !). • The SPEAKER said, he could not w. the explanation which. was offered could on the second reading-of the Alieiltilia4tragkJer). The LORD MAYOR said, he was awa r e tha' - .explanation' *did not apply strictly to the P"* the. House , but be tank that opportunity subject .was . somewhat similar to that e nation—(Laughter).—The worthy Magistrate sat down, ' . ' - Mr. B. BATHURST argued against tions of the Honourable Member on the 0 meet were most anxious for the attainment (Mr. Ward), contending that experience were opposed to the speculation dnd that Honourable Member, when he maintained English Jacobins, or by whatever other might be called who desired the overthrow Government, had so•disposition to seek from congenial spirits in ether nations • be recollected, that when the enemies of object, they made an appeal for assistance tional Assembly of France. But if Gentlemen look to the general conduct, or rather to system of the disaffected of this country, flail them resort ,to every quarter of the . any symptom of 4 similar spirit appeared. indeed, notorious, that every movement rection, or disaffection to established G throughout Europe, served as a motive, and an encouragement to those who " I views in this country. Could any one , any disaffected persons in any nation w►. to come to this country, they would. meet reception from those of the same descrik • Thos , indeed, who thought that the sentiments 1 opportunities their alum(); sves, Cr) %, ere ;.00 - s c e• their si.rength ore than any sours by h o se conn,..ction an auistocrAti. , et h selves with ,:tnne ; in the Persons coil.. what was the m. afflicted this. &spites. tiers. During been barasseu , ith the object rernentr any V former tir, e, from Catholic issenrink, was I Religion and he most a... ulest mea T s __ I tssassination- -ference could- i" osed, as if welt Spanish :suire German t-street N a p o . Pakry Bill— ed on false as. d the best feel. t pressed up Near, hear).— rpePalar.— Ng t h e House i f people had but their hate He objected I unnecessary ; I for it w0,..,a hear) —and he but this, the ve r whom, or '. as they could I answer some cni a former military inter - conceive that Id be relevant hib4"gkier). aware t h at his he Bill before ty because the : _ of his ex p la. i.,trate haying it the observa- e lower bench e and practice I conjecture of 'aintained that er name those rthrow of the eek assistance a; for it must if our Govern- amen' of their rice to the Na. , itlemen would to die uniform they would e world where lied. It was, Lent of insur- Geyernments had i an u t eb e x a m p l e, tt v sa m e the thaty y 6 M..