Star. — London, England, 1829-03-14 00:00:00

i . :.niAr Abu. Wu.ks.r..l r .6.) . 4 - r..:1 41 • lc.: woe. h, t he motion of Mr. ell AS. P A I.l.mta, leave was given to soble la a UM en ruble the Weat India Dock Company to raise a further sum of money. On the motion of Mr. PLANTA „ h new writ wn ordered to be issued to Ara a Slember tor the flortsugh of Newport, in the Iroom dubs Una. C. B. Perry, who has accepted the pits of Comptroller of the liou.ehold of the Lord Liititenant of Ireland. Th e SOLICITOR-GENERAL obtained leave to bring in a Salto enable the Ilenchers of Liticilltes-inn to carry into effect an 'agreement entered into bettri•en them and others of Lincoln.-Inn, end the Rector and Citurchwirdens of St. Andrew's, llulborn. (In the motion of Mr. ()UNISON leave wee given to bring in 'el Hill to molds the Port's Rates and other Parochial matters in the Parkb of St. \l'arY, Itotherlnthe. Colonel POWELL presented Petitions from the inhabitant, of three P..risbas in the county of Cardigan again.' further Contra ;eons to the Catholics. These Petiti.ms were ordered to be pouted. Lord cAsTmeit RAG H onsented a Peeking in favour of the 'Catholic Claims from the Roman Catholic inhabitant. of Oil.- 'borough firrland). Sir it KRIM ISON presented Petitions against further Comes 'lions to the Catholics from the inhabitants of four Parishes in the 'county of Saffalk. Captain CUST presented similar Petitions from the inhabitants el fitur Parishes in the county of Uncoil': and a Petition from a l'ari.a in the county of Stafford. . Mr. SE YMOU li presented a Petition from the town of Taunton Ire fivour of Emancipation. laenersl PEACI I Y admitted the respectability of the signatures WIWI' to the Petition; hut he lea it hi. ituty to his constituents to 'state that the Petition did out represent the sentiments of Taunton and Its vicinity. There was another Petition in the course of pre• pareiun front that town, more nenternuily and respectably signed, which be should have the honour to present to the House in a abort time. Mr. LESTER presented a 'Petition from Pool in favour of Concession to the Roman Catholics._ Mr. DOH slay presented Petitions of Catholics front two parishes'in the county of Tipperary, praying for a Repeal of the Venal Code. Mr. W. SMITH, in presenting several Petitions in favour of the Claims, contended' there was nothing to fear, and denounced as highly censurable, language used elsewhere, that the major►ty of 'the House were prepared to carry the question, by *Wilkins the Constitution at the shrine of treason and rebellion. The Petitions were from the Unitarian Meetings of Hackney, Meath, Derby, &c. Sir R. HARVEY presented thirteen Petitions from Easton, thadwell, Hi!Roston, Dunbope, and other places in Ewe:, against Comessiun to the Catholics. Sir H. SMYTH. on reference to an assertion made on a former 'occasion, declared his convktioo that th_ ! majority of the county of , .itssex was hostile to Emancipation. Mr. ARK W RIGHT presented a ,ITetition from Rye, in Susses. against Emancipation. . )Jr. BROW NLOW presented ten Petitions from Catholics of various plates in Ireland, praying a Repeal isf the Penal Code.— The Petitions were chid!, from parishes in the countks of Do negal, Antrim, Carlow, Armagh, Down, and Cork ; and another from the city of Bath, containing a Similar prayer, signed by nine Clergymen of the Church, nearly all the Methodist Ministers,forty Officers of the Army and Navy, rad two hundred Isousehoklers living on their fortunes; in all about WO . persons. Sir I'. LIT 11111 IDO E bore testi mony to the respectability of the Pignat urn, and adduced the Petition ass proof of the altered feeling of persons in the county of Somerset on the Catholic Question. Mr. I.ATOUCHE presented Petitions from three parishes in the county of Kildare, praying a Repeal of the Penal Code, and against the Vestry and Sun-letting Acts. Mr. DEN ISON presented a Petition from the Unitarian Dis senters of Gocialniing, in Esse:, praying a removal of the restric tions on Catholics. Mr. BAN KES presented a Petition from Eye, in Nonhamp tonsbire, against Concession to the Catholics. Mr. TUITE presented a Petition from the Non•eommisslained Officers of the Westmeath Militia, ptaying Pensions in case at a soloed.= in their Regiment. Sir H. SMYTH presentesl a Petition numerously and respect ably signed from a parish in Essex, against the removal of the Catholic disabilities. Mr. G. MOORE presented a Petition from the Cord Maim. Alden's.- it,atid Common Council of the City of Dublin. The known loyalty cf that body would give every:possible 'weight to the pr iyer which they made to this House. They had no tear but for the safety and security vf the Protestant Church arid State. The Pe. .titionersieretted the experiment which- had just been made - by firs blijeste's' Government, and they boldly state that other temedies might ban easily been disco. vesent.• The next Petition was from the Guild of' Mer chant.; who further prayed levity into the possessions of the. Jesuits, • from the Cur porations of Stationers, Saddlers, Plasterers, Joiners, Barbers, and Surgeons. Mr. DOHERTY admitted the number of signatures to thoseVetitititis, but what a eight ought to be attached to Heti would be seen by-and-bye. He bad no doubt whatever of Their loyalty—lce hoped they would still continue so—and the best proof of it would be in their hailing' with gratitude the measures now proposed by bits ir3 .jesty's Government fur the pacification of Irelard. He admitt-cf that becoming langu ige should be at tached to amity Petition, but nut an equal deftree of weight to all. In that Hasse, even, certain MemWN had a degree •of weight on given subj cis attached 1* their o p inions, 'which were very probably rhferred to alas. Num bers alone should not be taken into the account, and while mach prejudice wig abroad on this great ques tion. he thought the sooner it was settled the better. He had heard nothing new on this subject; and, indeed, all he had heard was 1688 over and over again repeated. He thought that the joiners and the plea( ten, even the Lord Mayor and Sheriff of Dublin, were not tlie best' judges of the nice constructions of an Act of Parliament, and on which this question mainly hinged. He *assure, if his Learned Friend allowed his capacious mind to consider the question calmly, that there would be little difference between them. It in private life Gentlemen bad differences as to their estates, they would not consult joiners or plasterers, or the Sheriffs of Dublin. They, would, doubtless, first aeply to a very different class of persons. Already a Petition had been presented - from the English Bar, signed by SW men of the highest respectability; and in the course of Monday he would have to present a similar Petition from the Protestant • members of the Irish Bar,,aruoitnting to 100, and from C Gentlemen of the same Bar s to. the number of 67. He would not have said thus much if he did am feel it necessary :o show the House what weight should be attached to those Petitions. htr.TRANT said that the opinions of the la a Lord Clare and Lord Oriel wear adverse to Emancipation. Resides, some of the most respectable Members of the' lush Bar were also against Concession. He would plentibn the Colleague of the lion. Member and Mo- Sailia. He felt a res• anxiety on this question, and .Therelote it was that he so oiteu presented hinssirlt to their notice. Mr. G. MOORE defended the respectability and the 10, +aqui the petitioners, andihecould state that amongst she petitioners were to be found some of the most le spe:table; wealthy, and intelligent men in Irish society. The humblest individnil,. how •ver. in a Corporation, harTtighta and privileges, to take cite. of, and if he xotilltt not give a Legislative opinion, he could, at all events, feel it. an independent MAIL The Protatant re ligion was dear to hint ; he hod eights to protect.. and tionikti he might not have brilliant talents or snaking eloquence. yet he liehtsuffici-nr good sense to direct him sprit. liven the. rejig .ices- or the people should* he respected, and he could qu-te the opinion of the. late C inning in. justification of what he hat OA stated H could assure his Honouratle and Learned Fiievel 0* lie hzedcstimly con,ideled this sutiject, t vat lie o not,4perate s l upon. b 1 any bias, an d th a t h e h a I nut maitii.ed oprireons.with a view to sellike the tepett,ent.s nt tyreCit) at Dublin ; he we, mistaken it he cool Ur-a m...esang Mink so. Since ever he could think, eu I• I collegiate life anJ since, he con:ideted that ti r. a . sl y it ish.yt i ..0 •c Wed atainta.libis ntei made t h e Pe n e.r ,nt Cn Atit l iti Ur. POHMITY m 04104 He bad merely repotted. *at whilst ethers were yielding to the twee et eireemstaiwes, his Hee. Priced mill sdhered to bis caramel opinions. After a few remarks tram Mr. H. l, RATTAN sad Lard TVL. LA NlORlLthePetitiees were brassie up and ordered to bat printed. Mi. G. MOORE—The Petition be bad mot to pm sent was signed by upwards of four thousand per.ons ,ho had not merely subscribed their hot added .heir addre.s..s, ro that it could not he liable to the ob j-c.ions so frequently made to PI itions against t . e Catholic Claims. It included u large a mass .1 seipeetabolity and wealth as was perhaps to be f mod in any equal number of sign *Avec It was sitbsci 'bed by the main body of the ,Magistrate, of Dubin. by * great portion of the higher class of society sn that eapit 41, by a considerable number f tie mew end freeholders, be.isles between four alai five bundled students of the University. Tn. addition of these names testified that the rising youth of Ireland , Aese 4$ much opposed to further concession as their mote mature contemporaries. It might be said to esta blish the gen rrl .ense of the youth of Ireland—loi :hough it idosg in Dublin, they were connected with f.muir► ell owes the country—and, when it was fought th I. to 4 yeti inn of this kind were attached so many names • f students of the University, the fair inference wa that the opinion of the youth of Ireland was in ac. cordance with their sentiments. He did not mean un- duly to put this petition foiwatd, as had been charged by the lion. Member lot Kilkenny ; he applied to it no epithets it did not deserve, and a reference to the bigna.. tures would confirm the observations he had made. Mr. NORTH did not intend to have trespassed on the House, but for the observation w hich fell bons the Hon. Member for Dublin, who wished to have it understood that because the Petition he was about to present had the signatures of some hundreds of the Students of Trinity College, Dublin, it contained the sentiments of the tising youth of Ireland. He (Mr. North) bad good means of forming an opinion as to the sentiments pre vailing amongst the Students of the DOH!' University, and his opinion was, that their sentiments were tavoura _ ble to the settlement of this ipiestion in a mintier which world promote the tranquillity and happiness of their country, and Cott they were like what youth is every *heir when unbiassed, mist favourable to the calla of ftealum. The Hun. Member fur Dublin, however, no doubt had heard that vet y considerable pains were taken to intu e peels teal opinints of a tiff-rent charac ter amongst the students of the Dublin University : but he (Mr. North) consideial that there could be no baser lact than to betray the sacred trust ie d o.ed in those who had the education of youth entiosted to them, and to take those advantages of that opportunity to instil the deadly viols r f ;laity spirit and prejudice against one class of their fellow subjects, in minds nut yet ripe not matured. He was ' confident, however, that if any such at empt had been made in the Dublin University, it had proved a most signal f ilure. He was wet) acquainted . with the sentiments of the youth of one profession at least—he meant the youth of the 1ri..11 Ear; and he did not hesitate o state, that to every great extent they entestainedseo •tnnents on this subject cotre•ponding with his own. He also knew much of the youth of another profession— ttose gong f nth to the mioiitty of the Irish Church ; and, although animated with a noble zeal for religion, and an atm rue desire to diffuse the principles of the Protestant religion theoughout the country, he .was en abled to say that they considered the Tuition oreatho lie Emancipation nut as a religious but merely as a political question, and that they were desirous totem it to the eosisioe.:atithr of the Guveinment and the Legisla, tore. lie apologised foe Itespassing cm the attention of the House; but he felt called Nom to offer a respect' ful but decided contradiction to the 'statement of the Hon. Member for Dublin, that the petition contained the sentiments of the rising youth of Ireland. Mr. G. MOORE had no doubt that the st itenteat of his Hon. and Learned Friend (Mr. Noetb) was spite consistent wila the information he bad received: the fact was not to be disputed that the petition was signed by a considerable . portion of the under-geaduttes of Trinity College; and he had been assurei by persons more intimately acquainted with the state of political feeling among the youth of Ireland than himself or his Hon. Friend, tut for ty-nine out of fifty of the present Students of the University were hostile to concession. His Hon. Friend had said that be (Mr. M.) was not ignorant olthe meal's used is indocile* opinion: be disclaimed any such knowledge, and be did not believe that any ezer tioas whatever had been made to excite a particular feeling which otherwise would net have had existence in the College. He was satisfied that after youths had mooed the University no osearts'of any k.nd were used to excite them against thatattolies. He was quite aware that there woe many individuals in Dublin Col lege, zealously, honestly, and conscientiously devoted to the principles expeeserd in the petiti In; bat of this he was convinced. that there was not any one of those in dividuals who (to use the words of his Hun. and Learned Friend) would betray the trust reposed in them fur rise education of youth, for the pug pose of exciting political F clings, or would take any course to prevent the ez pression'of unbiassed opinion by those under them. • Mr. CROKER said, that even allowing to the opin mina of the individuals who had signed the Petition, who he supposed were strictly the youth of the Univers. sky, all the weight which he would even grant to those who had ezperienes of the situ.tion of the country for the last twenty or thirty years, still he would ask his Hon. Friend hostile was, if forty-nine outof every fifty Members of the. University. wet e favourable to his opi sions, that only some handfed& bad signed the Pe.kion t bearing only a proportion of one sixth to the. •hrile amount of the body ? He thought the signing of thisPeti , Lion was not the wisest thing on the part t.f the young men who had signed it, and certainly dot on the part of their instigators. The University derived her distinguished origin, in being, as she had bees called, the eldest daughter of the Reformation. She had always shown herself worthy of that distinction b her mildness, her toleration, and by the gencruite mei with which she had maintained the purest Protestant principles. The University hadn It now chosen to take any part in the question, and her silence spoke in a voice fonder than that of tongues. In former years. the Uni gamy had petitioned against the Catholics; but in this etis4. when every body felt e titled to come forward eith a declaration of their opinions, she had remained silent. He was therefore entitled to say that. she had taken the part of a friend' to toleration, and reposed het eonfidence in the Government and in the w.sdosn Parliament He thought' this was proved by the result of the election seli:n his Hon. Fit nd.,was opposed whip( as a candidate for the tepresentation of the University, and. he wad confident that if that event were to recur to• motion', his Hon. Fiend vo.uld be I.ft in a very small wino its,. Mr. Mooite said he had no doubt that when web as recur, it woald rodeo hi. 11.05 Yesend:s very great disappointadla Mr. CItOK klAi add be mild assure gist Hon. &lead that ha must not titter hiniselfwbatever might become K him (Mr. C) in ouch an event—that-be should not be succeeded by a Protestant bigot. With the exception of Mr. fluster, all the Members warned I.a the thiliter,ity •JUZe the br.t &skates of the gme.tlon in 1795. bad been favourable to ILineinipadeso.-Tbe &Aim was ordered .a it visited, • Mr. HEN at *Hit airriesested foorPetltlotte from the musty of Dobbs is raiser of the Clakaw—Ordered to be Fisted. • Sir F. BURDETT said, be had a Nitwit to pressor, be hoped for the list time, from the. Jtnman C.thalie. of Ire ; and he had also a Petition to present from the inhabitants of this metropolis, signed by 8,000 per •eins, in fay.iar of thr Catholic Relief Bill. The one Petiii in was *sample of the good sense rithe Pio trstant inhabitants of England, whilst the other was the prayer of tlie Roman Catholic inhabitants of Ireland, and both petitions were deserving of glen considera tion ; for lie believed they were not li ride to any cf those objections as tde against several of the Petitions, presented at the other side. He, was unwilling to cast a slur on the P. titioos presented. or on the practice of petitioning, but it was impossible those Petitions c.suld have any weight when, in order to procure them, ap peals were made to the vulgar and obsolete prejodice. of the multitude--iTheH inourablellaronet here allu Jed to a hand-bill, eau led " A Scourge to .Popery," which he stated had been distributed through different pails of the country). Those things were really almost be neath notice, but yet, when the fe ling of the country was spoken of, it was impossible not 't s recollect that such means had been minted to; but he was gratified to add that they had entirely (ailed, for there was no matter base enough to work upon in this country. He was highly gratified with the information he had received as to the effects already produced by the •proposed measures in Ireland. He had always witi cipated the best effects from those measistes; but be did not anticipate that those effects would have been produced so at eedily. The R man Catholic Associa tions with a generosity and wisdom highly creJiteld • to it, )iad alriady dissolved itself, and thrown its Won the justice of P'arlia'ment. The agitators of Ireland were now 'gone, and the anti Catholic agitator, at home would soon be tranquillized and obliged to earl cis: the same forbearance. for they would not find people here to work upon. Ile understood that nut only the Roman, 'Catholics, but the It nos wicker. and the Orangemen,had already made a movement towards reconciliation. The Catholics had met their former opponent .with open a m-, and had given a foretaste of the beneficial effects which the proposed measures were likely to produce. Very violent attacks had been made on the character of the Right lloiiourable Gentleman opposite (Mr. Peel, but he (Sir Fran cs But det:) was of opinion that the at tempt to catty into effect a meatus, of conciliation was no reasonable ground for reproach. Them was much angry feeling on this suhject, and much de2te cation both as to the benefits likely to result from the proposed measure. and as to the - conduct a those who introduced it. He could not pass over this opportunity without observing that the Right Honourable Secre easy for the Noche Department was ably a.sisted by the Right Ham Seesetaryfor tot Colonies. That Right Honoaraole Gentleman had made a m ist effective speech, slid one much to the purpose—(ll as). He (Sir Francis Burdett) was happy to see Gentlemen of that [note:don taking a plot in the management of the coun try. No men in his opinion Were more b. nevoleut, or practically bitter fitted to mariage the affaiss of the country. The Right Hossourable Gentleman, from the ranks of the army, bad real a lecture tq the Chutch. He said that in the army they had n.s civil dissen ions ; there were no distinctions amongst themselves; the ) slept in the same tent, matched in the 'stmt • rank, mounted the same breach, and were oily emulous of glory; they were buried in the same grave ton, and rested their hopes on the same annum ea. Such were the 'sentiments of the Right honourable Gentleman, and they should be written in letters of gold, and should enrich the walls of every cottage and cabin in England and Ireland. As to the Noble Duke at the head of the Government, it was unnecessary to say any thing of him. He was now r. Witt' surpassing glory crowned ;" for all joined in praising the ability which he had di.. played in those measures. There was a passage in Harlington which peculiarly struck him as applicable to the present Government. Harrington said, 4 ' . n)• re is seasetblag in the leading of as mins, and in the go vertment of States, which belongs peculiarly to Gen tlemen," and that remark he thowlit belonged pecutiaily to the present Government. As to the E sgli.ll Catho lics their conduct was above all praise and above all reproach. They depended on the justice of the country, and they would now be achnitts:d within the pale of the constitution. and the Empire would at length be uni: ed. The time of the House could no longer be occupied with discussions of this kiwi, and the other interests of the country would be attended to. He had received a letter from a member of the society of Quakers retidest At Cloonan', stating that since the report • f the speech of the Right Hon. Gentleman had reached Ireland, on the part of the Quakers oho had hi.herto opposed them AU hostility towards the Catholics hai ceased, and that the Catholics were so analogs for the reconciliation that they wished it not to be postponed a single day, and the parties absolutely paraded the stems arm in arm. (Laughter). In France and in other countries the pro gress oft lerant principles had been prodiscive of great public advantage, and it was only reasonable to expect that the same consequences would result from the mane measures in this. He had no doubt that Hon. Members would see grounds to mitigate their opposition whim they observed the beneficial consequences that would follow from the proposed treasures. The Honourable Baronet concluded by piesenting the petitions. Mr. THANT said he was unr o lling so frequently to trouble the House, but an impel ious sense of duty im pelled him. not to let any opportunity pass of contributing as tar as he possibly could to resist the destru.tion to that Constitution for which our ancestors had suffered and sacrificed so much. He confessed he felt no little surprise at the eloquent eulogium pronounced by the Honourable Baronet upon the blessings of a military Government—(Loud cries of “ No, nu no"). If his ears did not very much deceive bins. the Ho nourable Baronet certainly did in substance- pronoui an eulogium upon a military Government. The Hon. Baronet declared most distinctly, that, in his opinion. a military Government was the fittest for this country in its present circumstances; he said he rejoiced to see military men in that House, and the iespoosible situa tions in his Majesty's Gores nment filled by membersisl that profeuion, possessing as they did the distinguished chief at the head of the Administration. From this he (Mr. T.y was justified in assuming that the Honour able Baronet . did approve of a military Government, ant considered it best fn the country. He had heard, much of the Quartermaster General and the Szliff of the Noble Person et the head of the Ministry, and he trusted he might be allowed to say he beard them spoken of, as. the lien. Baronet had alluded 5. , pointedly to the subj-ct of a militar,,Government. T. is, however, he (Mr- T.) bane: , to be understood as doing with e.ei y possible respect for the gallant person in question. He confessed he very much doubted bow far the seat m nts then. pronounced so &tiering to military G niertiment would be acceptable to the people in England, in U e assertion of whose right, the Hun. Baronet had so is •••• •••• i • qtatutly stool f.s *sal lle put it to t :fans B week whether that people, whose clt .naoaors be fottneity was proud of beieg, would opt look with peculiar j•-alo,isy upon a y snea.usei tt °Jute(' by a military gorernni•tii? and he must take h- liberty of sayi-I, th t if they were told that the BM must pass, because is had sem on and coun:ensirce from a trete n !ilea quo et, Hon. Nf7ab-ts o ppo,it e d erw ied. an d (tuns thou u us. peac. tice, a.r allowing such assettions to pa s, without stand ing forward in support of Abet great Cons i.utional principle which repudiateJ any interference with pro ceedings ot that House, and which those II n. Mem ben had ever been the first to vindicate. Those who were pietty well acquainted with the Cons'itution of the country and the proceedings of Parliament, regarded such interference w.th the freedom of debate and the hari . ileges of the Legidatuie as, to say the le: at of them, not very decorous. Upon that point hr dial not think it ne• ressary to say any more, no. should he have said even .0 much had he not thong! t it doe to the privilege of th at H time, had he not throlAht it necessary so to meet the argumeuta on the other side, and to show loath the oriconsistency of Honourable Members on that occasion. With vestect to the general teunur of the observations ..hick the H-ruse had just freatd from the Honourable Ila.noet, he would leave them to be umwered by other Nlember s of that Ilou.e, attached to the true Protestant principles of tf:e Constitution. He could not have been tempted t • rise at all time it not to point out to the U use the degree in which the Honuotable Baronet was enamoured ot a o.ilita y government. 'Lod F. LGOWEIt observed, that it might have been expected that in Ireland some degree of mimics. aeon would have pia spaded on she acnouncement of the news of the intended measure of :chef reaching Ire& land ; but such, Ire had great plenum io being able to say, was not the ca-e. , It load been received with calm and reasoning sari facion, as ts ell by the Roman Ca. tholics themselves, as by those ann.ngst the Putestent part II the Government oho wire favourable to Ca. thistle. CI skit. ; it had been received with gratitude to th at sovereign of 'whose reign it formed the greatest gtor). If ever he feared that that measure would come to I late, and such misgiving% he confessed, had frequently massed his mind, be had now estreme gran ficaton sn declaring that such fears were now com pletely at an end. For his put he had resolved to follow the vitt:cal banner of that Noble and illustiions leader sit , ' the same reliance on his great mind as he would have tol'owed his military banner, which was never unierl.-d but at the 6.111 of victory 1-4 Cries of Hear, heat). That great commander wit then on tie point ot achieving his greatest conquest, compared to which those at Vinsiera and in the lines of Torres Vedras were as nought—*bat conquest which, he trusted, would crown, not close, Ins bright career, when the watchword of hi. farmer glory would be laid aside, and the voice of liberated Spain, .nd the elocrient gra titude of long-subjugated Franco, be drowned in the acclamations c free asid pac fled Ireland. Mr. Alderman WAITH MAN said that the petition had been dined by none bet the most respectable characters. Lord NUGENT maim-hied that the. Hon. Member for Wear. minder bid not advocated the principles eta military Government, but the Administration of the Governm, nt by military men, Mr. CIIA ILL ES PALLIER felt himself brunt to make two en - marks ea the speech of the Hen. Baronet. He eddied to deny the inference that because artificial recitations had been resorted to, it followed that the great mass, or even any considerable proper. nun, el the petitions were the effect 4•1 that excitement, Ile denied it on the part of the many petitions which be. bad presented. It was nut fur him to define the inteilect which bad been drawn by dame Gentlemen between differint classes of the people of this country ; but he would nisiotaito that a great majority of the free holder. ot England* were averse to the tossers** which their Re. presentative' were popeahig. It the Huo. Hannan was rialitly informed as to the tranquillity of Ireland, he (Mr. Palliser) di bed hint to rejoice in it 111411 C than he datl : he whiled its coutiousuce mote than be expected it. The two Petitions were then read. The first was the general Petitiou of the Roman Catholics or !Wand: the seam% a retitiou in favour of the Roman Catholic Monts from uoderaigised orals adult inhabitants of Lon kill, Westminster. said the places adjacent. —Ordered to be printed. Mr. BASTA BD pres.titi d a Petition from the Preteasnts of Plymouth against further concessions to the Boman Catholics.... The same Hun. Mcmb. r pies:sited Petit loos !rotative other races. Mr. A. STEWAR presented a Maim fret* the Roman Ca- Stalk inhabitants et a p irisk in the cattily ef Londoodwry, praying for reUet.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. !ISM/SON presented a Petition from the parish of Yeleer. tun. in Northamptonshire. again.. further cinicessmos. itlr. LA MB presented a lktition from a pariah in Ireland, pray. int for the concession of Roman Cafholie Mr. EAST/It/Ph:presented a Ileitis° spins further Conces sions to the Roman Catholics from a pail* in Glauceuershire. Mr. C A ET W If IGHr presented a similar Pythias from Baited, in Nunliamptooshire. Mr. TitAbiTsitesented a similar Petition from Meadlssan, in Suffolk. The Rae/ of UXBR I DOE presented a Medlar Petition, signed by SOO householders in the parish of Catiduck,.St.ffordsltire.. Lord TULLAMODUK presented three Petitions to the same effect from Oonfert (Galway), Newcastle (Limerick), and from the Nubility, fatuity. Clergy, and Ficebulders of the county of Clare.—All ordered to be pruned. Sir W. ING I LBY presented a Petition to favour of Catholic Claims from Loug &atom (11'1(011).1'(sp). Ifir ff. PARNELL presented similar Petitions horn Mary. borough, Stradhally, Ballwin% and Dysart. Lord G. SON RESET presented a Petition from a place in Mose mouthedre against further Cutlet:Woos to the Romeo Catboltes.-... Ordered to be printed. Ni. PEEL presented a Pethion from the Silk Tlirowsters of Manchester, praying for procectiou ; and a Petition fromtbe county of Galway, praying that the Shannon might be made navigable; avid a Petition from the Clergy of Clunfert and a parish lithe dio cese against the Catholic Claims ; and a Petition from Forfar, and a Petition from Chichester. in favour of the Catholic Claims. The Right Hoooerabk Gentleman said he hid also several Petitions from the Catholics in Ireland lo favour of the adjestinest of their Cleime, proposed by his Majesty's Minister.. He thought sending those Petitious to him was a pried that die Catholic. irk satisfae. tiara ar the mauler in winch the question was proposed to be set. tied. and be WAS happy to hod that the turamare was likely to pro. deer the best rilkicts, and in the speediest manner, In Ireland— (,Hear. hear). The Eight Houourable Gentleman presented tear Petitions from Catholic 'mules 311 Ireland to the elect be bad stated. ammo ?Sawn= saita.aeo sou. Mr. PERI. said as the debate on the Catholic Relief Billy/odd I occupy the Hesse to a late hour on Tuesday night. be thought it would be cionveniem to postpone the second reading of the Elective • Franchise Bill to Tlimulay. The Right Hou. Goodman mewed accordingly.—Agreed to. Mr. PREL gate notice, that on Monday be would Votive foe leave to being in a Hill to suepend for one year she soaking net dig lists for latitudes fur the militia. The obi. aof the Bill would be a reduction of expense—Meer). . cuItIOCTIIII OP 11OPPLT. Oil the motion of Mi. Dawson the House resolved itself into a Coninuttrit'of Supply on the Miscellaneous IlstiOnaits. kir. DAWSON said, there had.beelow reduction of .1110":00 in the eliwellaneous liatintates and CUB Contingencies dace law year. He moved that £2116.500 be granted fur public buildings and repairs kw the year ISO. Mr. WARBURTON mentioned that his Heth.Erieud ( Mr. Ileum) was absent from illnese, and be hoped the eathwatee would not be poweeded with until be could attend Mr. DA WbON said. be had received a mote from the Hoc. Gentkman that day, in which he mentioned hie expectation of beimt able to attend on Monday. He only wished that the several estimates should now pass through the Committee, and would move th.t the ittpurt be brought up on Monday, when the Items might be discussed, and if the House thought necessary aketed.....- The Resolution was agreed to as were the follow/big t A 7,000 fur works hi Fort Patrick Harbour. All 000 kw works.in Dou.shadee Mai b sun. Atop ea fur wares in KilliKoll Harbour. £13,000 for sew builtibigs at the British Museum and Royal Library. .Eul44 0 fur Windsor Cagle for HIM Ms. HARVEY said, k appeared that this sum was only roe on. year. He hoped, when the Repot( was brought up it watt he stated hew such mosey bad been mended on Window Calle d sad how much more would be wasted lee its completion.