Star. — London, England, 1808-04-09 00:00:00

I ■ ' PARLiiimz.vrAßr PROCEEDINGS. • HOUSE OF LORDS, APRIL I. Mr. WHARTON brought up from the Commons the Inn keepers' Bill, which was read a first time. Mr. Irvin, from the Customs, presented certain accounts. ROXBURGII ESTATES. At two o'clock the LORD CHANCELLOR and several Peers assembled, pursuant to order. The Counsel on that branch of the Scots appeal respecting the Roxburgh Estates, wherein John Ballenden Kerr, Henry Gawler, and John Seton Kerr, Esqrs. are Appellants; and Sir James Norcliffe hisses, Bart. and Brigadier- Oeneral Walter Kerr, are Respondents, Pere called in, and Mr. John Clarke, as leading Coussel for the Appellants, was beard at considerable length.--To proceed again to-morrow, at two o'clock. SCOTCH JUDICATURE. The LORD CHANCELLOR, on the Motion for the second reading of the Bill, rose to make his promised observations. His Lordship said, that the measures he proposed by the Bill for their Lordship? consideration were of the utmost importance, as they regarded the administration of justice in Scotland, and were every day become more necessary, by . the increase of its commerce, agriculture, manufactures, and population. He had long been convinced, as their Lordships must also have been, that some re medy was absolutely required, to put a stop to the number of appeals from that country. He did not mean by this observation to impute any improper conduct on the part of the Judges in Scotland ; but their formslof proceedings were so complicated as to make it absolutely impossible, in most cases, that the parties could come to any issue, as it was called by., the gentlemen of the law in this country. The Judges were also Judges of the law, the fact, and, by virtue of the nobile ? Ai:am, of equity. This rendered their decisions uncertain, and often contradictory. But the great and almost only cause of the appeals was, that the execution on the decisions of that Court was sifted till the appeal was decided. This induced the parties, nine times out of ten, to appeal, without any pretence or ground whatever, but that of delay.— He might, perhaps, be wrong as to such a dispro portion. but sure he was the evil existed in an enor mous degree. His Lordship then stated, that his opinionshad been misrepresented, and it had been asserted, that he was inimical to the trial by jury being introduced into Scotland : but he could assure their Lordships, he was not averse to the measure, provided it could be adopted with advantage to that country. He, however, saw at present insurmount able difficulties in making it a general measure, as he thought there were many cases where a trial by jury could not be resorted to. This was occasioned by what he had already stated, namely, that the Judges, by the nail( qfficium, were judges of the fact,. of the law, and of equity. Were juries in these cases to decide indiscriminately, the consequences would be still worse than if no trial by jury had been adop ted. He thought likewise, that the people in that country were not; prepared for trial by jury ; and however that nation might be as capable as other na tions in learning, they certainly had no distinct no tion in general how decisions were given in trials by jury in this country. This he was convinced of, from the great variety of communications made - to him on that subject, none of which had specifically stated in what particular cases Juries should be intro duced to decide. With him it was a fixed principle, that all changes and alterations, with a view to im provement, especially in such cases as the present, should be gradual and progressive ; and, at the same time, as much as possible in the original style and character of that which is meant to be improved.— When he considered the habits, the usages, and what in law considerations the people of Scotland had been accustomed to, on this ground it was proposed by the Bill to divide the Court of Session into two divisions, or chambers, in preference to three, as proposed by the Bill brought in by a Noble Baron (Lord Gren ville) in a former Parliament • ow consisting of eight Judges, in which the Lo rd President was to preside ; and a second of seven Judges, at the head of whom the Lord Justice Clerk was to sit. Were he legislating for a people similarly circumstanced to the English public in these respects, he should pre fer a division into three courts ; but the people of Scot land, he must repeat, were very differently circumstan ced. This division of the Court involved a variety of I subordinate regulations, as to modes of proceeding ; which, as being matter of detail, would be mere re gularly adverted to and discussed in a Committee of ' their Lordships, than on the present occasion. The Bill before them differed in other material points from that of the Noble Baron ; this contained no express provision for the introduction of the trial by jury.— On this point he would previously advert to the senti ment of that profound and venerable lawyer, the great Lord Mansfield ; it was the decided opinion of that great man—" That the trial by Airy, considering the " existing and long-established system of the Scots " law, and the habitudes of the people in those re spects, could not be advantageously introduced into " that country." In some degree he coincided with the opinion of that great Lawyer on this point. In the present constitution of the Courts, and form of proceeding, he thought it would be unadvisable to introduce the trial by jury into the law of Scotl4d, at least suddenly, or to any considerable extent.— Another feature of difference between this Bill and that of the Noble Baron, respected the establishment of a Court of Review; such formed no part of the present Bill, and at present he forebore to say any thing on that point. He Lordship would now come to the latter provisions of the Bill, which proposed the institution of Commissioners, with powers to in quire into the forms of process, the modes of proceed ing, &c. in the Scots Courts, the fees and emoluments of certain officers ; and also into what cases, and in what manner and form, the trial by jury could be moat usefully introduced; a more extensive practice of viva yore evidence, and other matters ; and that such Commissicners, against a given time, should re port the result of their inquiries, so as that the whole might be laid before Parliament: By these .provi sions, their Lordships would "sec "that a contingent and progressive improvement in 4E7 partictilar an eluded in the former measure, contended for as-re quisite, was contemplated and Provided for in the present Bill. His Lordship wished the Bill shbuld be committed before the holidays ; and after the re cess, on a convenient day, he should move its reconi mitrnent. The Noble and Learned Lord concluded by moving, " That this Bill be now read a second time." Lord Viscount MELVILLE said, he thought it.' unnecessary to deliver his sentiments upon this im portant measure before it went into a Committee. If there was any temptation, however, for him to speak,' it was merely to compliment the Noble Baron oppo! site, for the great candour with which he had treated the measure on the present occasion. That _ Noble Lord had modestly confessed, that he might perhaps be biassed by some prejudices. He hoped the same credit would be allowed to himself : if he laboured under other prejudices, and other impressions, than those of the Noble Baron, they were honest prepos sessions and honourable prejudices. He was sensible that the lawyers of England might have their preju dices also, and perhaps in the course of the debate in the Committee, he would find himself contesting points with men not only of the highest legal charac ter, but who also might labour under honest preju dices in their turn. He thought the measure of such importance, that it ought to be deliberated upon with that slowness and circumspection which are the true characteristics of wisdom. -His Lordship then read the opinion of Lord Mansfield respecting a change in the_ judicial system of Scotland. If he found doubt as to the propriety of the measure, coming from su ;h high authority, there was certainly addi tional reasons for treating the subject with caution and circumspection. His Lordship concluded, by intimating it to be his intention to deliver his senti ments at full length hi the Committee. Lord LAUDERDALE thought that the form ing the Judges into three Courts would be better than that of two • and as they were to have met on alternate days, the same Counsel could have pleaded in all these Courts. But by the method proposed by the Noble Lord of the two Courts sitting on the same day, the business of the Counsel would be very much impeded ; and as one Court would per haps not give sufficient employment to him, as one of the great Courts gave to Counsel here, it would hence become a very serious injury. Besides, it was of ad vantage for the Judges to have these alternate days, as it gave them more time to peruse thepapers by . which the most of the business of the Court of Session was. effected. He denied the assertion °Nile Noble Lord; that the great bulk of the appeals from Scotlaiul weft I made for the purpose of delay, as he hid &served in looking over the decisions of their Liirdships;that out of fifty-four appeals, twenty-seven bad been m versed. . • The Bill was then read a second time •pa Pingo . , and ordered to be committed on Tuesday next: . • COTTON AND WOOL BILL. On the order of the day being read :for the third readtfig of the Cotton Bill, Earl -Bathurst spoke at lerigth in support of-the Bill Lord St. John opposed the Bill. Lord Itedesdale and Lord finwkes bury argued in defence of the.measure. Lords Grenville, Lau derdale Darnley and Auckland, opposed the. Bill, on commer cial aniconstitutional principles. The question was then called for, and the House divided on the third reading of the Bill. The numbets were, ' Contents,,44--Non-Contents, 18—Majority. 31. The Bill. was then read a third time after which Lord Litu as %DALE proposed an amendment, which was negatived. The other orders.of the day wempostponed, and the House aljduried at Hag-is:lt Twelve o'Clock until this daT. - • •HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER acquainted the House tkat he bad received a lesteeffrom Admiral Stirling, conunending the squadron off Monte ViWeo, in answer tp the thanks voted by the House nn the 1; ti of April, 2607, to himself, and Officers, seamen, and marines, for she valeliir displiyedin the capture of that place. • ' • Lt PERCY, Obairrnan of the Weiford Elecek,n reported, that...the caumhtee were prevented from proceeding thii day by the absence of one of their Members, Mr. Baca rut, occasioned by an illness which: rendered his attendance dangerous to hii.tie. *Mr. litcxrceto era/ accordingly excused from further atteadinee.. 3 ": • .• • On the questien being put, Lord GRENVILLE sac, and entered into a Lordsiips 11191110- Writ was gr iedi t Hem. WiMani SES i t hr mot want to be' brief, but perspicuous leading points thro Lord. This great sure before their Court of Session in three Chambers or he had the honour _ 'was universally admitted, come necessary in titration of Justice SCOTLAND obtained Jame preservation of the public records Lordships, his proposi‘. part s_ inked Kingdom. Sessions into three, preferably to any oilier number of Mr. N. VWNSITTART gave notice of a motion on Tuesday, divisions, was the result of much laborious inquiry I for the produedon of Papers respecting the Trade and Nevi.. and mature reflection upon his part. The suggestion gallon of die Kingdom. Mr. BANKES gave notice of a motion for Monday, as we un was entirely his own. He still remained firm in the I derstood, respecting the increase and diminution of the . Civil List conviction of its superior advantages ; nor did any Revenue. thing the Noble and Learned Lord had thrown out, shake that conviction in his mind. Much was said of the long habitudes of the people of Scotland in these respects, their accustomed usage, and their consequent attachment to the present form of their Courts of I t ra str a " . . Law, and the modes of proceeding therein. For his Printing Journals o f th.. w part, lie believed their fellow-subjects in that part of the United Kingdom, universally felt the necessity of some important change in the amelioration of these things. Nor did he believe they were so much at tached tached to the Reesent form and constitution of their Courts, as to be adverse to any change which would induce an effectual and decisive improvement therein. He differed materially from the Noble and Learned Lord as to what he had said respecting the impracti cability, or the injurious tendency, of the introduction of the Trial by Jury into the Scots Law. The autho rity of Lord Mansfield was referred to by the Noble and Learned Lord. However he might respect that Judge as a great law character, he was far from think ing him infallible ; from his authority in the present case ke widely differed. He disapproved of the Bill as a measure in itself ; first, on account of the di vision of the Court of Session as proposed by it; and secondly, because it did little or nothing beyond pro posing that division. It did not go far enough. Aa to the proposed Commission of Enquiry, upon which the Noble Lord laid such a favourable stress, he also' differed from him. He entertained no such favour able hopes as to the result of such enquiries. He thought, for obtaining the necessary, and at the same time speedy information, their Lordships must be in debted to their own time and labours, or to those of their Committees ; the process of external enquiry would besides tend to retard and delay the completion of the necessary consequent measures; and he trusted, that should the House ultimately adopt that expe dient, a specific time would be insisted on for the de livery of their Report. Notwithstanding he felt those objections most forcibly, he confessed, that upon the whole he should prefer the passing such a Bill as the present, to leaving the grievances complained of with out any remedy whatever, and on that ground he should not object to the Bill's going to a Committee in the House, that it may receive some salutary and efficacious ameedments. SUPPLY. The Housithaving resolved itself Into a Committee of Supply, Mr. HUSKISSON moved the following Greats:— Maintenance of Convicts ... ... ... 445,000 Stationary and Printing for both Houses of Parliament 51,500 Stationary Record Office ... ... ... 2,500 Printing Journals of the House of Lords ... 21,000 Towards defraying the Expence of an Estimate for the better preservation of Public Records ..., ..: 4,459 Pay and Cloathing of the Militia ... (Same as last year) Allowances to Adjutant and Subaltern . Officers of Militia disembodied ... ... (Ditto) Mr. HUSKISSON then moved for a further sum of 30,0001. towards carrying en the building of the . Royal Naval Asylum at Greenwich, and said, that he should have oecasioa "to'move for a further sum, for the salaries and allowances of Dacus, and maintenance of the children. Sir CHARLES POLE objected to the grant of so , jage s suns for an establishment, the management of which be -said was every thing it ought not to be; and the Officers of which were not of i proper description, as he should spew en Monday nest. He thought that before any further grant shiiAild be made account should be delivered of the application already Made of the former grant. He had reason to believe there was ghat im providence in the expenditure. Mr. HUSKISSON said, that he should certainly be for the production of such an account ; and also of * estimate of the future expense. But, in the mean while. he thought the build ing should not be suspended till the enquiry sbnuM he complete. The building was already far advanced; and by its suspension, a considerable expense would be incurred under *• caatract fee* building. Mr. WHITBREAD thought the enormous expences to which the country was put by the building of Darraeks was a sufficient. warning against voting sums for any public building without a specific estimate. Sir CHARLES POLE said, that an additional reason for in- , sluing on the production of an estimate and acceiants - tif expend-. , tore in this cue was, that a great part of the sums formerly grant: ed for this institution was squandered in preparing reddened for, and giving extravagant salaries to unnecessary Officers.: For in stance, a large sum was devoted to *converting apart of the build ing destined Jar an infirmary into a commodities residence for. a Reverend Doctor Clark, to which were added furniture, a gar den and paddock of about two acres, and onVollete, and allow ances of coals and candles, and a .slaty of SOIL s year as auditor: an office surely which did not require igebe maintained at such an expellee, merely for examining the accounts of maidenapee,for . 60 boys and 40 girls, for that was the wick of his official duty. There was not a parish in London whereof the Vistty Clerk had not three times more badness to transact; and any clerk from the yards of Deptford or Woolwich could do the whole of this Gen tleman's business in less than a month, at less than a twentieth of the expence. Dr. Clark might be a very worthy Clergyman, but he could not see the justice of burthening the establishment with unnecessary and extravagant expences merely to create erne lument for him. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER thought, from what had been said by the Hon. Baronet, that estimates and ac manta ought to be produced; but he did not deem 30,q001. an extravagant demand for carrying on a building of that magnitude. However he was so convinced of the necessity of the estimate and , account, that lithe Hon. Baronet did not bring forward a motion for them, be himself should do it. Sir JOHN NEWPORT thought 50001 suffieknt, pending the proposed enquiry, in order that the House might be convinced the former grants had been fairly expended. Mr. HUSKISSON acceded to this sum; bat added, that if even' the whole had been voted, it would net have been issued from the Treasury without due enquiry. With respect to the Officers, and thelisalarics, he was not comretent to say whether or not those salaries were too large ; but the Honourable Baronet would fruit lect they were appointed by the Commissioners for conducting the Institution. Sir JOHN NEWPORT also urged the necessity of having the estimate. After a few words from Sir CHARLES POLE, in which he said the expenditure of the last year was considerably increased by the preparation of the House for the Auditor, the sum of 30001 was agreed to. nova sandid discussion - ' A , new the Lords o by the Noble ano' '• ' . 6 ,, ..-• • • Bark • . of Mr. R. D L•t prominent feature oftitet, "4.-q." ,- b , the e t As ' t g o i. roons Lordships was, th e divisic. " ''"", ‘•-• 46 1 ~ • the Chiltern in Scotland into two, instead of ' ''': ,Ms ALMER gave machos, a or i tivisions, as proposed in thelliL • to mave for a Coal vtt liht tr to submit to th eir Lordships. ..Irsdlimzabi• Palmer, * f o , B " l ",„ a ..." . '"'"'"'""" . •• Ldmitted, that some change had be. c Clailiestall yes seiverted, a the preset system of the Admini- engrossed. - • ein Scotland. He could assure their 1 The 'LORD APIrOCATE of SCOTLAN roposition for dividing the Court of to bring in a Bill for the better preservation of 1_ _ , _ _ r i a that RarLofthe United Kingdom. -• .- _ Mr. HORNER revived the subject of Commercial Licenses. and moved for a Copy of the Minutes of the Proceetlinp of the Lords in Council, hi respect to Commercial Pawnees. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER assented—mad the motion was agreed to. CONSOLIDATED FUND SURPLUS. • On the motion of Mr. HUSKISSON, an Mem from the Trea sury presented an account of the surplus of the Consolidated Fund of the last year, remaining in the Ex oss the Stli,April inst. for the disposal of Parliament. to on the table. Mr. HUSKISSON gave notice of a motion oa Monday la the Committee of Ways and Means for the disposal of the same. IRISh LINEN BOARD. Sir JOHN NEWPORT, pursuant to notice, ruse to move for 1 several documents respecting the proceedings of the Irish Linen , Board, which he felt the more necessary, in consequence of some communications he had received since he gave that notice,respecting sums issued to the amount of 4,3001. to Mr. Parks, the Architect of the Board--and also the appointment of a young gentleman, aged 17, a student in Trinity College, to the cece of Insfisetor- General of Linens in Ireland, when it was positively required by Statute, that the person to fill that Ofice must have been regy , lady brought up to the Linen Manufacture, and have carried on business for his own account. Sir ARTHUR WELLESLEY said he was not competent to give any explanation on the subject, as his Right Hon. Friend (the Irish Chancellor of the Exchequer) was absent. Sir JOHN NEWPORT replied, that the Right Hon. Gentle man was in his place when the notice was given, dad also yester• day, when the motion should have been made, and.did not think it to give. any explanation. This, however, was ,nn additional motive for lamenting that the Members of the Irish Government (with the exception of the Chancellor of the Exchequer) were not Members of the Linen Board, entrusted, as it was, with the dis bursement of so large a sum of public money. He concluded by moving for the documents, which were ordered. RUSSIAN PAPERS. Mr. WHITBREAD rose, in consequence of a no tice he had given, respecting the speech of a Noble Lord (Lord G. L. Gower) on the 29th of March last. In the course of the Session there had been much discussion on the propriety of quoting from official documents. He did not mean to go over all the arguments for and against that practice, he only thought such a practice . was unfair towards the. House, and that it ought to be prohibited. The' power to make such cotnrattnications ought certain to be confined to Ministers, as no other individuals' had a right to make such communications. The Nol. ble Lord to whom he alluded (Lord L. Gower) had lately been Ambassador to Russia, and be had made. certain communications to the Foreign, Secretes+ cir State, which that S had refused to lay before Parliament. Aker the ise of • Mr. Pitt, Lord Mulgrave had given to both Houses a great mats of iaformation, disclosin4 thingsvery improper to be com municated, as no motions had been made for their disclosure. These .related to the utter defeat of the Continental Confederacy of Anitria and Russia against •Franoe, which was entirely reined by the \ . ~~~ treaty a battle of Austerlitz. The Honourabl e i went on to complain that Lord Go wer h ad rd ' A. Part in regard to the co-operati on o f R t w ic e l r e , s p o r f es the arnieg h e of Tilsit; ac Austna at that period, and that that f act h a d the catastrophe of that campai gn . He also ' ;0 a iai _l the of Lor d secret G o wer, Pedwinathd t. that the field had been taken a ga i nst F an inferior force, namely, 406,000 otet ,: r • ance = .l five hundred thousand. He next adverted 7., conversations held by the Emperor of k m ; in regard to limiting the maritime jurisdi c • -, I Great Britain, and said he should b e glad oft., esplanation upon that point. He maintai ned, Russia had a latent cause for hostility t. • do e Z 'try, independent of the expedition to c o p which certainly had increased ; and thi s p oe t ' en it elucidated by several arguments. He next auea: to a private letter, written by Lord Gower to Canning, and commented forcibly upon what understood to be its contents. He denied that i Hutchinson had had any conversations with t o e f; peror of Russia, but those he had been instiga ted by Lord Gower • and that the Emperor hid, 't were, bamboozled Lord H. and had prom :Almeid a ' tirade against this country. The Hon. Gentle after dwelling on these points, concluded by mov ing, " That an humble Address be presented to his Mayen' y or ; tog that he would be graciously pleased to ceder diat - eb er ,b e ta upon the table of that Meuse., the decbratiou d e li vered to "" O. L. Gower, on the Itch of April, 1305, by the 92 astlan sister ; and also the communication made by L or d G . L. Canniiig, his Majesty's Secretary of State for F ,airs, between the months of June and Noven t y rr Sustainel the expr...ssion—" 11 _lout memszer "". lasmrent." e p t ., t Lord G. L. GOWER was happy to find thi s b e . mess at length brought forward, as he was ca o k e d he could justify his conduct to the House and t h e Canantry ; and that he could also make out, that be liid been no party towards bartering away th e run t s . time rights of the country. For this epportunir , was obliged to the Honourable Gentleman, and a would, in justice to the memory of Mr. Pitt, exce l. pate him from any blame for the failure of the con. &ieracy. He would therefore request his Right .Honlaurable Friend, Mr. Canning, to grant the nia link of the Honmirable Gentleman to the full extent, ;excepting with regard to the private letter. On that aubject, did the House think he had been deficientin his duty, it was an easy matter to express its disap. p•Obatfon, by a vote of censure upon his conduct for having written it. That, however, he imagined tot e 'totally out of the question. The intelligence com municated by that letter, came into his Lordshilfs possession in a certain way, and it would involve the interests, nay, even the lives of those who helped him to that intelligence, were the mode in which it was come by divulged. Besides, it would be a gross breach of condence, and a violation of all diplinatic faith. He concluded by moving— " That the words after "April 1 805," should all be omitted* that there be substituted in their place, " And such commune* tion between his Majesty's Ambassad or at the Court of St. Po tersburgh and his Secretary for Foreign Affairs, as related to the declaration." Sir T. TURTON rose to expreskthe indignation which he felt at the idle discussions which had so fro quently, of late, occupied the House on the subject cf Papers. It seemed to him, that those who bootie( forward such frequent motions,- were rather actuated by party Motives,, and perm:oat hostility, than by— ICries of Order!Order!) • Mr. 'WHITBREAD rose to order, and chained, •that though the Hon. Baronet's assertioris excited a emotions in his mind, since he felt conscious . of not do serving them, yet he could not sit still and hear the girders of the House so grossly violated. The SPEAKER observed, that what had fallen from the Hon. Baronet certainly appeared to Inta highly irregular. Sir T. 'I. URTON felt extremely sorry that any thing which fell from him should have given the Hon Gentleman offence, for whom he felt the sincerest and most cordial esteem : when he said fterronal enmity, he meant only po.lithal enmity ; and was =fortunate in his mode of expressing himself. He supported the amendment on the ground of the confidential nature of diplomacy. He would ask, if the state of Europe was again restored, what credit Ambassadors would gain at Foreign Courts, who made it their practice % divul g e secret communications. fie thought the Ho nourible Gentleman was condemned by his own a nt ; for if the papers laid before Parliament by ord Mulgrave excited throughout Europe such lively indignation, why endeavour, by the same cause, to excite the same sensation now ? Mr. HENRY HERBERT opposed the Amend. meat. He thought the very face of his Majesty's Declaration intimated a conviction that Russia bad joined in a confederacy against our maritime power. He thought that intimation should be proved when possible. This was particularly . called for, as the Noble Lord had expressed an opinion that, indeper dent of the Copenhagen perfidy, Russia entertained hostile views towards this country. He supported the motion of his Honourable Friend ; the most es: Isential point of which he thought would be lingered nugatory by the success of the Amendment. Mr. WINDHAM declared, that do one thougne more tenderly of private correspondence betwea the Government cf the Country and our Ministers g Foreign Courts, than himself. But the letter question had not been allowed to remain in secret. and therefore forfeited all the privileges of privacy — Having been quoted for an important use by there.. II son by whom it was written, the House had an un: doubted right to call for its production--a right sub' ject only to that general limitation of discretion, which ought to extend to documents of every descnpuon• Unless that discretion forbade the p r oductioro_ an .ss correspondence between public men on public affri ought to be produced. Nothing could more effecto• ally show the abuse of the principle of secrecy W . TAM Expedition , in the d efence of which on his Majesty's Ministers, after having be en Men from every other ground, earthed themselves ill secret articles andprivate.4nformation. ed *Mr. STURGES BOURNE thought the argana of the Right Honourable Gentleman had been founded, on misapprehension. The letter had not been q uo a' a by his Right Honourable Friend with a view to .in fluence the votes of Members. If the consider,a.". l _ of the question was now gene into , his Right rt.::: Friend would not be 'deterred by the high and tonal tone which the Honourable Gentleman nz'' assumed who bad brooght forward this question• — : The Honottra,ble Geagrman and his trieods had 0 _ •••• F. H,6.1 A 0 Er. St t*' Us _21.01 itad frees 121 ' lictsfi If seic V traces Y 414 Gdrcle site& :sir s I tieas *soul el Owed, 110 Pr mpg 1 4euten jtje . t all th *Nan Pr' Pr/ L A3II tibe it Which " E• m 'Der , ies, tkl air of s I d to pr they 111 , m d woi f'sor r ' it am: b r a tat! i II t ( .