Star. — London, England, 1829-07-23 00:00:00

, ,- L4W INTELLIGENCE. WARD OF COURT. 111 • COURT OF CHANCERY, JOLT 22. WELLESLEY V. TILE DUKE OF BEAUFORT. The Lord Chancellor, on taking his seat this morning, informed the Solicitor-General that he luid received a written communication from Mr. Ebden, in which that gentleman thinks it advisable that Mr. WelWilley's chi dren should not pass the vacation at Seagry. His Lord ship therefore thought the better plan would be to refer it to the Master, to report where the young gentlemen should pass the holidays. The Solicitor-General—l am not instructed to oppose any order your Lordship may think proper to make, but perhaps you will allow my clients to see Mr. Eb den's , communication. The Lord Chancellor—l think, Mr. Solicitor, it will be better not to let it be seen by either party. The Solicitor-General—My clients have, under the di rection of the Court, the superintendence of the children ; and they are anxious to know the grounds on which it is deemed beneficial not to send them back to Seagry. If it is in consequence of any expense, that ought not to be considered, when the welfare of . these young gentlemen is at stake. • The Lord Chancellor—l should not feel justified in coming to a final conclusion in the absence of Mr. Wel lesley. Perhaps, Mr. Solicitor, you will communicate with him, and he will attend the Court to-morrow morning. The Solicitor-General—l must repeat, my Lord, my clients will be dissatisfied, unless they see the communi cation made by Mr. Ebden, for they entertain such a dif ferent opinion. The Lord Chancellor---I lament these unhappy differ ences *; and it distresses me to find that no progress has been made in the appointment of guardians. I requested Master Eden to meet me this morning on the subject, which he did; and he informs me the business is now before Master Ferrer. The Solicitor General— It has been before Master Eden, Master Farrer, and Master Cross, the latter of whom now has it under his consideration. The Lord Chancellor—Then I will send for him in the course of the day : let Mr. Wellesley be acquainted with what has passed ; and that I direct it to stand in the paper for to-morrow morning—not for the purpose of argument, but for decision. APPLICATION TO COMMIT THE EARL OF ROSCOMMON AND OTHERS TO THE FLEET FOR CONTEMPT. Sir C. Wetherell said he was instructed to make a mo tion, which, considering the elevated rank of the party against whom he moved, gave him much pain. It was, that the Sergeant at Arms be ordered to take into cus tody, and bring to the bar of that Court the Earl of Ros common, Mr. Stowell, Mrs. Booth, Miss Louisa Booth, and certain other individuals, to show cause why they should not be committed to the Fleet for contempt, in disobeying an injunction granted by the Court to restrain the Nobte defendant from communicating with a young lady, one of its wards. The learned counsel then minutely stated the facts, which are shortly as follow : A young lady of considerable fortune was placed under the care of Mrs. Booth, one of the defendants, who keeps a fashion able seminary in the neighbourhood of London, during which time the Earl of Roscommon formed an acquaint ance with the young lady, and to prevent that ac quaintance terminating in marriage, an application was made for an injunction, and granted, restraining all further communication between the parties. Per sonal notice of this injunction had not been served upon the Earl, but he had affidavits which the Court ould deem sufficient to support the present application. The plaintiff's Solicitor, wishing to act with a delicacy due to the exalted rank of the defendant, served it upon his solicitors, requesting them to forward the notice to his Lordship. They received an answer, however, that he was from home, and on applying at his house in Mon tague-square, they were told his Lordship had that morn ing left town for Brighton. His solicitors, however, appeared in Court, and, therefore, no doubt could be en tertained but the notice was good. It appeared that the young lady had been removed to the house of a gentle man named Bradley, in the north of England ; that gen tleman i l / 4 nd his lady having determined upon a tour in North Britain, and with the concurrence of Miss Wal ker's mother and guardian, she was to accompany them. It was, however, discovered that the Earl of Roscommon must have obtained intelligence of their intention, his Lordship having, as appeared by a letter received from Miss Booth to Miss Walker, enclosing a short billet dour, made up his mind to exactly a similar trip, in which his Lordship says, " I will meet you, my dear, when and where you please to appoint." Upon this discovery, it being known that his Lordship's juris diction was not much attended to on the other side of the Tweed, Mr. Bradley prudently declined taking the young lady with him. Miss Walker was then sent to Furness Abbey, near Carlisle, the residence of her uncle.— She had scarcely got there when it was discovered that the noble defendant and his uncle, Mr. Stowell, were in the neighbourhood. On a morning or two afterwards they were seen loitering before the house ; at last Mr. Stowell approached the door, and in quired for Miss Walker alleging that he had a packet of letters for her ; when informed she was not within, he joined Lord Roscommon, and they went away. The Noble Lord, on this expedition, went by the name of Mitchell, and Mr. Stowell by that of Richards. The affidavits, after setting forth further facts, stated, that it .as the opinion of the young lady's guardian and friends, an intercourse between them was continued, and that the defendants were endeavouring to obtain a mar riage between the ward and Lord Roscommon. The Learned Counsel said be thought his Lordship could have no objection to grant the motion to its fullest extent, and commit the defendants, but in consideration of their exalted rank he would only ask for them to be called upon to appear and show cause why they should not be committed. Mr. Roupel was about to follow on the same side, when The Lord Chancellor said, quite sufficient had been stated for him to make the order against Lord Roscom mon, Mr. Stowell (the Noble lord's uncle) and Miss Louisa Booth; and directed that they should appear at the Bar-of the Court on this day week, to show cause why they should not be committed to the Fleet. COURT OP KING'S BENCH, Jinx 21. Sittings before Mr. Justice J. PAM and a Special Jury. SELECT VESTRIES.-ROGERS V. TYLER, CLERK. The reading of the documentary evidence for the de fendant was resumed at the sitting of the Court this morning, from which it. appeared that the select vestry was in existence in 1623 ; that it consisted. of 36 mem bers, exclusive of the two churchwardens and rector ; thitt the churchwardens were always elected by the pa ; that in the event of the death, or the resighstkiii3Otsuly of its members, such vacancy was filled hy.borne,Andividual chosen by themselves that (as wait! thle.. base at present, Lord Tenterden, • Mr. Justice Bayley, and . Mr. Justice Littledale, being members) it aunsisted of Judges, Bishops, and the'Attorney and Soli- i!_~ citor General, for the time being, and some of the leading parties in the parish. Two witnesses were also produced—one aged ninety three, and the other seventy-six. The former had been a member of the select vestry fifty-five years, and the latter forty. They proved that the churchwardens were elected by the parishioners at large, on Easter Sunday in every year, and that they, as well as the rector for the time being, were considered as members of " the select body" of thirty-six, making thirty-nine members in all ; that the repairs of the church were paid for out of the money collected from the parishioners, and that the poor rates at present amounted to 38,0001. per annum. Mr. Campbell then rose, and addressed the jury in re ply. He commented upon the evidence produced by the Attorney-General in support of the defendant's case, and contended that no proof had been offered of custom upon which the select vestry in the parish of St. Giles was said to be established. _ Mr. Justice Parke, in summing up the evidence, said, the declaration complained that an assault had been com mitted by the defendant on the plaintiff, at the time the plaintiff was giving his vote in a parish vestry, where he had a right to be present. There were several pleas: one denied the right of the plaintiff to be present; ano ther was, that there had existed, time immemorial, a ' custom by which a select vestry was held, and that the plaintiff had no right to be there. Another plea stated, that the said vestry was made legal by the 14th of Geo. 111. The question which arose on the record was, whe ther the plaintiff had a right to go to the vestry without leave ? I will tell you, gentlemen, said the learned judge, that provided the vestrymen then assembled were elected as the vestrymen were in 1774, they were lawfully assembled, and the defendant is entitled to your verdict. I will state the ground on which I come to that conclu sion, that the parties may apply for the opinion ofthe Court. The ground on which it appears to me there is a good defence, is this :—By the 14th of George HI. special power is given to the select vestries of parishes. By the 3d of George 11. which makes provision in case of the separation 6f the two parishes, there is an enactment by which the rates for the support of the poor are to be made by both parishes. The Act says nothing about vestrymen, but the poor are to be provided for by the joint parishes. The 14th of George 111. provides, that which was before done by overseers shall now be done by vestrymen of the parish. They are to meet in June every year, and make rates for relief of the poor. They are also obliged to appoint collectors and measurers, and make rules and regulations for the poor. It appears that on the present occasion these vestrymen were assembled and making arrangements for an apothecary to take care of the poor. Now, if they were the vestry protected by the Act of Parliament, they had power to do what they were doing. I think, looking at the Act of Parliament, that these vestrymen could not be considered the vestry, of the parish at large. They are directed to be part of the inhabitants, and it is clear they are persons exer cising. the office of select vestrymen. Provided you are satisfied, that the persons who compose this vestry are the same description of persons contemplated by the Act of Parliament, it seems to me the defendant is en titled to your verdict, on the pleas which deny the plaintiff's right to be present at the vestry. If you are satisfied on that point, find your verdict for the defendant. Then comes the question whether they are a select vestry within the provisions of the Act, meeting for purposes directed by the Act? You are to say whether this vestry has existed from time immemorial in the pa rish of St. Giles. Gentlemen, you must dismiss from your minds all popular statements, and confine yourselves to matters of fact ; with respect to the law, you will hear from me as the judge ; you are to say whether there has existed from time immemorial a vestry for doing the whole business of the parish, or whether there has existed, time immemorial, a vestry for doing part of the business of the parish ? You will also say, whether this select vestry has not generally attended to all the business of the pa rish ? You have been told that this select vestry cannot exist without an Act of Parliament, unless it has existed since the time of Richard the First, and in order to satisfy you that it has existed so long, evidence has been given of the existence of this select vestry for a long period back. Now I must tell you, that when we find a think has existed a number of years, we presume it has continued longer. On that principle many valuable rights depend. You are from long usage to presume immemorial usage, unless proof is shown to the con trary. Unless the Jury are satisfied there was a period of time between legal memory and modern memory, when this alleged custom did not exist, you must find for the custom. Upon the general princi ple on which juries act, you will have to say whether this custom has existence time immemorial, or whether this select vestry is a modern usurpation. If we were sitting hero to consider which would be the best mode of settling the affairs of a populous parish, I believe it would be decided, that it would be better to have a select vestry appointed by the parish at large. But the question now is, whether this body has existed beyond legal memory ? The learned judge then stated the evidence on both sides, and observed that it appeared to him quite clear that this select vestry had existed since 1623, indeed there was no doubt it was in existence in 1618. If they thought that vestry had exercised the privileges since that period, they ought to find for the defendant, for they had no right to appear among them. It was not to be supposed the legis lature would have given these rights to a body of men if they had not been established by custom. If, however, they should think the evidence offered by the plaintiff negatived the existence of this custom, they ought to find for the plaintiff. Mr. Evans, at the conclusion of the judge's charge, stated, that he should take the opinion of the Court upon special objections to the summing up. He could not agree that a custom was good that was uncertain. He could not admit that custom was to he presumed. Mr. Justice Parke said it might be better to take the special verdict, which would atiOrd an opportunity of bringing the points before the Court. That coarse Mr. Evans was- ready to adopt. The jury retired, and having been out an hour returned with a general verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 40s. Judge—Gentlemen, you find there is no select vestry by ancient usage ? Foreman—None, from time immemorial, my Lord. Judge—Then you find for the plaintiff upon the fourth and sixth pleas. You find that certain. persons acted as select vestrymen in 1774, who were not supported by custom ? Foreman—Our opinion is, that they were self-elected in 1774. The verdict for the plaintiff was then recorded. The cause was not decided before seven o'clock. The interest excited was strong ; most of the influential men in the parish of St. Giles were in Court. The verdict was considered a great triumph to the party who support Mr. Rogers. Tuesday morning Mr. Wm. Rutherford, the Tragedian of New York; and letterly.t4 the West London 'Theatre, was found dead In his bed at the Gun and Apple-tree public bogie, id Drury-lane. LONDON SESSIONS. Yesterday the adjourned Sessions were held at Guild hall, before Aldermen Scholey, Atkins, 'Venables, &c. INDICTMENT AGAINST DAVID LATOCCIIE, ESQ. David Latouche, Esq. a member of a most respectable and wealthy family in Dublin, was brought up by Habeas Coipus from th 4 Fleet prison, to be tried upon an indict ment charging 'him with having assaulted Mm. Jane Phillips, the wife of a person who is also a prisoner in the Fleet, with intent to commit a rape. Mr. C. Phillips was counsel for the defendant. Mm. Jane Phillips deposed as follows :—She was told by 'Mrs. Sharp, who was in the service of . Mr. Latouche, to call at his rooms in the Fleet prison, and receive an order for a straw hat. She did so, but upon her knocking at the door she heard a voice say that Mr. Latouche was engaged with his attorney, and that Mrs. Phillips must call again. She said she would come when sent for. Next day, while she was at dinner with her husband, Mrs. Sharp called, and accompanied her to the door of Mr. Latouche's room, but left her as soon as the door opened. Mr. Latouche, the moment witness was inside, locked the door, and shut down the window. " I," said the witness, " remonstrated with him, and said it was a very hot day for closing the win dow, and he said it was not. I told him I was the person who was recommended to make a straw hat for him, and asked for the description. He gave it me; but as I was leaving the room he seized me round the waist, dragged , ine to the bed, held my hands, threw me down upon it, and detained me about three minutes. I screamed aloud for assistance, told him I was in the family way, and begged he would not hurt me. He said he would not have the least compassion on me, hut would do just as he pleased. He loosened one of his bands from under me, I suppose with intent to disorder my dress, but I forced myself away, and threw him against a table filled with glasses and bottles. I then flew to the door, upon which he seized a glass decanter, and said he would injure me more with that than with what ho intended to do. He put his back against the door, and squeezed my hand by 1 jamming it. There are two doors, and he jammed me between them. My hand was black for some days. He told me he would not let me go till he had done what he pleased with me ; and I said that I would rather die than submit to his wishes. I then flew to the window, opened it, and screamed as loud as I could, but no one was walking on the ground at the time. He then said he would let me go if I would promise not to expose him ; and he let me out. I never saw hint before, and he and my husband were never acquainted. I went to Guildhall, and was advised by the Magistrate to indict." Cross-examined by Mr. Phillips—l swear I screamed as loud as I could. Mr: Phillips—How far is the window of the room from the warden's house ? Mrs. Phillips- -1 cannot tell. Mr. Phillips—You can't tell ! You can form some judgment, surely ? Mrs.Phillips—The Warden is not always in his house. Besides, the Warden's windows are not always open. Mr. Phillips pressed the question as to the distance, and Mrs. Phillips at length said, that the distance from the Warden's house might be half or the whole length of that Court (6 or 12 yards). The hour at which this violence was offered to her was half-past two o'clock, and still there was not a creature in the great court. Mr. Phillips—Pray don't people live below and on each side of Mr. Latouche Mrs. Phillips—No one can be heard along the passages, screaming. Mr. Phillips—You have answered my questions most ingeniously, by drawing inferences for the adoption of the jury. The learned counsel then addressed the jury, and called Mr. Samuel W. Dart, solicitor, of Red Lion-square, who deposed that he was in the habit of visiting Mr. Latouche professionally, who was in a very shattered state of health for many months, and whom the surgeon of the prison attended. On the 4th of June he was with Mr. Latouche, when Mrs. Phillips knocked, to take measure for a straw hat. Mr. Latouche desired her to walk in, but she said she saw he was engaged, and she would call again. His impression was that nobody said Mr. Latouche was engaged with his attorney and that she must call again. Mr. Latouche was lying on the bed at the time, from decided debility. The window of the room looked into the front court-yard, and the door opened upon a corridor common to all the rooms. There was a line of rooms opposite, all of which were inhabited. All the rooms below were also inhabited. Witness never passed through the yard in his life without seeing persons there. Mrs. Sharp was then called by the Court and ques tioned. She heard Mr. Latouche express a wish for a straw hat, and she told Mrs. Phillips to go to him, with out receiving an order from Mr. Latouche. Mrs. Phil lips afterwards told her that Mr. Latouche had put his hand upon her waist and praised her, and that she pushed him against the table and broke glasses and decanters. Mr. Latouche never had a decanter in his room. He kept his wine in long French bottles. Mrs. Phillips never showed witness a bruise on her hand ; but she said she was frightened. Mr. Dart swore that he never saw a decanter in the room in his life. Mrs. Phillips—lt might have been a bottle he took up in his hand fur what I know. The Recorder summed up, and the jury immediately found the defendant —Not Guittz. Colonel Rowan and Mr. Mayne, the Commissioners under the new Police Act, wereengaged on Tuesday for a consider able time at the Home Office. The Commissioners were engaged also at their office in examining about Cony candidates for the situ ation of police officers. The late Old Bailey Sessions was the shortest ever known, the whole of the business having been completed In little more than three days. Mr. Thomas, the constable of St. Paul, Covent-garden, has been appointed, by the Home Secretary, one of the " District Odeers of Police," under the sew system which it shortly to be introduced. An accident occurred yesterday, in the vicinity of Fins bury-square, which proved fatal to a poor boy, named Ensley, who came to his death under the following cir cumstances :—lt appears that a gentleman, a merchant in the city (Fenchurch-street), was driving his chaise, ac companied by his servant, along Crown -street, Bishops gate-street, when, suddenly, the animal took fright at a painted (red) ladder, which was attached to a house, and darted, full speed, along the street, knocking down stalls and every thing else which came in contact with him, until he came near Clifton-street, when he ran on the pavement, threw out the gentleman and his servant, and the wheel coming in contact against the head of the toy fractured his skull. The home gallopped on down Chi ton-street until he came to King-street, leading to the market, the end of which is barricadoed by iron pallisades, the chaise coining in contactivith them, as also the horse, broke dowmat least eight feet of the railing, and shattered the chaise to atoms ! The poor unfortunate boy wait taken, bleeding, to Mr. Robert's, a surgeon, in Wilson. -street, who, finding him dangerously wounded, recosumeo.ded that he .ahuuld be .tjkcn to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, lehich was done, but when he got as far as Grnb-itreet Ihe expired. The deceased now lies in the hospit9J. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION—HOUSE. Yesterday a strong country-looking• man was brought b e {,„ Mr. Alderman Key (who sat for the Lord Mayor, who was u. tending a General Meeting of the Governors of Christ's Heso w to audit the accounts), to be forwarded to the Blockade S t m t. The man had surrendered himself as a deserter from the si n k ; and was desirous to return, being In a starving condition. Aw t poral from the Tower was anxious to know bow to pr0e t , 4 1 . .. Mr. Nobler said the man must be taken to the Tender, and fiv e 'thence be sent to his station. He was taken away accordingly. • GUILDHALL Yesterday Rickard race, a journeyman butcher, in the e bt *. of Mr. Woodbans, a salesman in Newgate market, and Iris Farr, the driver of a waggon belonging to Mr. Kingsley, et Kb, too, carrier, were charged before Sir Peter Laurie with euesi g ir 4 be exposed for sale in Newgate market the carcase of a cow tem% had been wasted with disease, and was unfit for human food. Joseph Bates, a patrol, proved that the meat was brought % the market about five o'clock in the morning, on the top of leg's wanea• In answer to a question from Sir P. Laurie, the prisoner p ft said be brought the meat from the farm of Mr. Collison, at New England. Hitch* Herts. Mr. Collison's men, who gave it to ya k said the beast was alive between twelve and one o'clock on A tt . day. He did not see the meat in question. as it was templ et * wrapped up in a large cloth. He did not carry any letter to Kr. Woodbam, and he bad no reason to suppose Mr. W. was awar e this beef was coming. Caleb Cooper, a porter, said he carried the beef to Woodhent's, and the prisoner twice masted him in hanging it up on the batty in the shop. Wace, being interrogated by the Alderman, said he had seta wone and better meat than this. He took it in, but one Il e . saner Wood bad the assuagement of the business of his mato, who is out of town. Wood did not see this meat before it o n bung up. A man, named Pritchard, was then called—He was identified at a saanufaeturer of saussges, and he said the meat in question oat worth a peony a pound for dog's meat. Mr. Over, the Master of the Butcher's Company, said, from m e knowledge he had of Mr. Woodbans, he believed he would net have suffered the beef in question to be brought into his shop If be bad been in town. He had no doubt the animal died with disease, and was not k for human food. The system of sending diseased and rotten meat to London was of 40 years' standing. Sir Peter Laurie said this was an evil of the greatest moment t 6 the public, and he should move, In the Court of Aldermen, that an inspector should be appointed over the meat markets. He also hoped that the lino on the person who seat this meat would not be less than one hundred pounds. Wace was then held to bail to appear at the next Sessions, and Farr was admitted a witness, and was bound over with the rest to prosecute. The meat, which bad a black, dirty, carrion appearance, wat ordered to be burnt forthwith be Smithfield. The weight was abort 4601b5. The City Solicitor was instructed to prosecute. BOW—STREET. Yesterday Mr. John Wiggins, Commander of the steam boat called the London, plying between lilackfriars Stairs and Rich. mond and Twickenham, was brought up on a warrant, charged with baying assaulted his cabin-boy, John Thomas Mullet. The lad deposed, that the Captain was in the habit of chastising him, without much regard to whether he was deserving of punish. went or not. About a week ago, as they were sailing between London and Twickenham, the Captain committed the violence upon him. which formed the subject matter of complaint. His arms and body bore marks of the severity with which he bad been used—and two ladies who were passengers on board came forward to add their testimony to that of the boy. The Captain denied that he bad used undue snaky. Mr. Halls—You cannot deny having beaten the boy. The Captain said be could not. Mr. Halls upon this admission ordered him to give bail. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday Margaret harry, a lymph of the pave, of no very prepossessing appearance, .was charged with the following robbery. Mr. Maggs, a middle-aged sedate-looking gentleman, stated that on Tuesday night, about ten, he met the prisoner in Holborn, and was induced by her tender solicitatioes to accompany her to her lodgings In Gray's Inn-lane, where he intended to pass the night. I When be retired to bed he had sixteen sovereigns and a half in gold, and some silver, in his breeches pocket, and likewise a five pound Bank of England note in his pocket book. He was awoke in the night by a noise, and on looking round, saw the prisoner at the foot of the bed partly dressed. He jumped out of bed, secured the room door, and called fur a watchman, who same and took the prisoner into custody. On their way to the watchhouse the prisoner was searched, when nine sovereigns and some silver were found concealed about her person, and which witness had no doek were his property. The prisoner said the money was hers, and that she had saved it while in service. Frauds Millen, a watchman, Ttated, that hearing the alarm given by the prosecutor, he came up and took the prisoner iota custody. On searching her he found nine sovereigns S and some silver. Prosecutor said he had lost 91. is. The prisoner was fully committed to Newgate for trial. MARLBOROUGII-STREET. William Cooper, a young man, rather shabbily attired, was yr terday placed at the bar, charged with robbing the Bavarian On pel, in Warwick-street, Golden-square. It appears that for some time past there has been a decrease in the stock of Prayer-books, Bibles, &c. belonging to the emigre. gation. Yesterday morning the prisoner entered the Limpet at about a quarter past seven, and knelt down near the Vestry.; tat in the midst of his devotion he had his eye fixed upon the Vestry door, and having been missed for a moment, he was discovered to be mach nearer the Vestry; bat the Prayer-books, fourteen in I number, were found on him, and skeleton - keys which be had I picked the deck lock wi t h, an d these moans had got tbebooks so easily. He was immedi a t e ly taken into custody. lie was fully committed for trial. UNION-HALL. Rickard Yms, stewtrd of the Columbine steam-packet, W 24 charged with having conveyed a quantity of brandy on shore, en which duty bad not been paid. A Custom-house officer said be met the defendant in Toofry street, carrying a basket, in which were deposited several bottles of brandy. The defendant said he had purchased it at Calais, wii brought it ashore for his own use. The Magistrates fined him low. and in default of payment, be was committed to gaoL A man named Giles was remanded for assaulting Richard Wei, •who now lies in the hospital without hope or recovery, owing to a concussion of the brain, received in a contest between him and the prisoner. The latter was told that if the wounded man died, be would be unitedly committed for the murder. BIRTH& At Portobello, near Edinburgh. the Lady of Captain Wright, of the 7th Regiment Madras N. I. of a daughter. At Fentingtoo, near Chichester, the Lady of Augustus S. Berke ley, Esq. of a sop. In Montage-place, the Lady of Wm. Medley, Esq. of a sea. The Lady of 3lr. Charles Oriel, of Alfred-place, Bedford-squat% solicitor, of a son. At Felbridge, the Lady of George Raikes, Esq. of a son. MARRIED. By special licence, Sir Richard Hunter, to Miss Hulsey. of Brighton. At Kensington, Major-General Newbery, to Margaret, widow of the late It's. Inigo Jones, of Chohhani-place, Surrey. At Hampstead Church, Sydeobant Malthus EN. of Albury, Surrey, to Mary Anne, eldest daughter of the Rev. Samuel White, U.D. incumbent of the parish, rector of BrightweU, Oxon. At St. James's, Clethenwell, Mr. George Gtbbs, of Brighton, to Ann, only daughter of Thomas Taylor, Esq. of Queen's.row, Pentanville. At Amusell. Hens, the Rev. Charles Turner, of Lambeth. Surrey, to Katherine Ann, second daughter of George Catbrow, Esq. of Hoddesdon, Herte. At CuttisbaU-hall, Norfolk, William Morton, E. late of the Civil Service, Rental, to Miss Ward, only daughter of the Rev Dr. Ward. At Giling, near Richmond, Yorkshire, Samuel Ware, Itaq. to Mary Divert, widow of the late Thomas Divert, Req. M.P. At Aberdeen, James Edmobd, litsq. Advocate, Aberdeen, t Mary, eldest daughter of the Rev. Professor Paul, of King's College- DIED. At Glasgow, In the 74th year of hi age, Alexander M'Kear, ilaq. formed .f Jamaica. At Queen 's Place. Leith Walk, George Forrester, Eaq. late Surveyor General of the Customs. At . .ledburab, Hobert Sbortreed, Eq. Sheriff Substitute of Rut • byeabehire, in hie 0701 year. At Arbroath. •Air. George Kidd, send rennet ly shipmeter, la bis 90th yea . . At Dunfermline, Dr. John Spence. SI.D. surgeon in the Royal Na'.v At Mammoth, at the age of 20 'years, Georglana Beckwith althrist..the youngest daughter of Wm. Qiicliria, F4sk of Aatigus- Intrnow: Printed and Publaed by Joint Marra, at the STA& OPTICR, No. I, Pickett-place, Temple Bar. i.J.....1.. . ... . NUMBER 13 TO ENO'? This day was published, four superior Engri STUART'S HISI giving a full deserip from the earliest ages to Printed for Whittak This day was THE STUDENT Observatiosso ; in Science are rendered fat of School& Printed for Whitish London ; and John He. ANTI-CORROS mended for Paint as well u for Palming t cultural Implements. I Colour4, is more dural Workman. Manufactured by Ft tentees of Hamelin, Mi RING WI DOWER'S ALOI Alopecian eompla signatcd by the Pruprii from the Ring Worm ii complaint in Foxes, WI lame manner. The Inventor of this several hundreds of Pe become so numerous, self, his family, and the Letters of thanks, ft are placed in the hand application. Sold in pets at 21. od corner of &. Paul's, Princes street, Edinbm Of whom may be hai safe remedy for the Pil EVER ANXIOL DAY and MAR they have, after pease, brought to perft and extreme difficulty prevent the many Frau An attention to the foil the genuine Blacking pi pink colour coven the Day and Martin are pi black, and placed on a 1 as also white letters edi lace pattern, the signati ground, the preamble i black letters on white' NATURE is a innumerable bl. antidote for every dim treasury, with all its Medical Science; and discover and develope ; For twenty years ha the treatment of a cer selves to the removal the remotest stages, c malignancy. The int Urethra, have been I also those delicate and Female Sex. The in& whether as arising f atmosphere—the instil gaiety, or the more al *. which shun the Ugh' gradual dereliction of circumstanced, and m nubial pleasures, we lit. the " /Egli of Li " The Syphilist," a ; " Hylpriataa," esel which must prove ben These Books may Chapple, 29, Pall mal don ; Sutherland, No Gratton-►treet Dubli Remedies can be fi writing for the same 1 Attendance at Isom GOSS and Co. 11.1 street, London. " Domui Thy hour Thu dont APPINESS, AA insured by mu ship." is a gift from 1 which, says Johnson , with celtstisl inteltlge Previous, however becomes an impends to cleanse the grosser dom of unrestricted neglect of such sum instance• which, wh holder, should also it Luxurious habits tropics will relax if Ertntatute infatuatlo tural dignity into a sufferer more than we address ourselvi (achy ; nor will ou they are by the :nut The easy cares of su+penstoo of those for the female hal ►toengthened, ar.d de In every case of s of the generative ec and with effect. Hai from the position SI cenersl principles w I , nyvtirahle integrity Wet the suffering c tering hits matron( attendance i. given I country are Mimed' tAnce for Advice an part of the world, I 11• T Just publishe • tan►iliat Commas addressed exclusivc Princes -street, Soho Shiswood, Gilbert, 59, l'all.inall„Lo bl'Phutt, 155, Trot and of all klookselb 97, IF 11 i.