Star. — London, England, 1827-07-04 00:00:00

'NOCHE SERENA. Dr DELTA. 110 X ZZACIWOOD'S ILDINSUIGN MAGAZIN , . How tranquil Is the night ! The torrent's roar Dies off far distant ; through the lattice streams The pure, white, 'threw moonshine, mantling o'er The couch and curtains with its fairy gleams. Sweet is the prospect ; sweeter are the dreams From which my loathful eyelid sow unclosed : blethought beside a forest we repowdi Marking tbe summer sun's far western beams, A dear•loved friend and 1. The nightingale To silence and to us her pensive tale Sang forth ; the very tone of vanished years Came o'er me, feelings warm, and visions bright; Alas! bow quick suck vision disappears, To leave the spectral moon and silent night ! LAW INTELLIGENCE. Seats, RZNIAILINGS, Aerials, awn PICTITIONII, leroaa IEI Loma Cnancact.ois, aeraa Tanner TIMM, 1827. Thursday, July 12, First Seal— Friday and Saturday, such Picas, I) mowers, Faceptions, Further Directions, and Causes, as are specially marked for the Lord Chancellor; Monday and Tues. day, Rehearings and Appeals. Wednesday, July 18, Second Seal—Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Monday. and Tuesday, Rehearings and Appeals. Wednesday, July 25, Third Seal— Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Monday, and Tuesday, Rehearings and Appeals. Wednesday, August 1, Fourth Seal-.-Thursdat, Petitions. N.B. The last day of the Lord Chancellor's Sittings before the Vacation, will positively be Friday, the 17th of August. Paaas, Dmayasass, Ricer:sops, Foarsaa Mammon; CMISKS, •1111) PITMOIII, 1121011 C VIM Vsca-Curtneas.aos. anza Tatum Tsui, 1827. Tbunday. July 11, First Seal—Friday, Saturday, Monday, and Tuesday, Pleas, Demurrers, Faceptioas, and Further Directions. Wednesday, July 18, Second Seal—Thursday, Friday, Satyr- day, Monday, and Tuesday, Exceptions and Further Directions: Wednesday, July 25, Third Seal—Thursday, Friday, Saturday, onday, and Tuesday, Exceptions, Further Directions, and Causes. Wednesday, August 1, Fourth Seal—Thursday, Petitions. COURT OF CHANCERY, JULY 3. Tilt NINO OF SPAIN D. HOLUM AND OTHERS. The COURT was occupied throughout the day With hearing the arguments or Counsel on a demurrer filed in this cause. At the conclusion, the Lout CHANCEL- Loa requested to be furnished with some of the cases, and postponed his decision until a future day. WARD OF TH coma. Mr. LYNCH ' at the rising of the Court, rt..quested that his Lordship would look over and approve of a draught of a deed of settlement which had been .prepared on the marriage of a ward of the Court. The Master had seen and approved of the draught., but his Lordship's canc• Lion was also necessary in thicease; and as the parties did not wish to make the circumstantes or the names public, he had to request his Lordship would hear it in his private room. His LORDSHIP assented, and was followed out of Court by Mr. Lynch. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, JULY S. LnNOM AN AND CO. V. SMITH. Mr. SUADWELL applied on behalf of the plaintiffs, the well-known publishers of Paternoster-row, for a special injunction, to restrain the defendant, the Rev. Mr. Smith, from printing, publishing, or exposing for sale, any copy or copies of the late Lindley Murray's Abridgment of the knglish Grammar, as published by him in 1802, with several additions, alterations, and improvements. The affidavit on which the application was founded stated, that Mr. Murray published his English Grammar in the year 1797. The work went through several edi tions, and in the year 1802, Mr. Hurray was induced to publish an abridgment of the work, the copyright of which, as well as that of the original publication, was in the plaintiffs. This abridgment reached no less than 93 editions op to the time when the defendant Smith published copies.of the work. The defendant admitted his having done so, and was now satisfied not only that he had no right to publish copies of the work in question, but that an injunction should be issued against him. The Rev. Mr. Smith, addressing his Honour, ob. served. that he was led into error by seeing a copy of the work published without any title, from which cir cumstance he was induced to think that it was the same edition as that published in 1797. He had discovered his mistake, however; and, having looked into the affidavit of the plaintiffs, was satisfied that the statement th.tein contained was correct, and he had therefore no intention to oppose this motion. Indeed, so far from wishing to do so, before he published his edition, he waited oa Mr. Green, one of the plaintiffs, and sub mitted to that Gentleman a copy of the work, observiniis that if he had taken any part of the legal property of Messrs. Longman, he was willing to erase it from the work if pointed out. " No, no," said Mr. Green, owe must have a rap at you."—(Laughter): " I told him," the Rev. Gentleman continued, " that lwas willing to give him all that an application to the Coirrt of Chan cery would do for him ; but he reminded me of Naamau the Syrian, who, when desired to cleanse•himself in the waters of the Jordan, preferred the waters of Egypt : sb it would appear that the plaintiffs prefer the order of your Honour to the relief which I was willing to afford them." (Renewed laughter). The Rev. Gentleman con cluded by hoping that the injunction would point out to him those passages of the work claiined by the plaintiffs. The Vacs CHANCELLOR grained the injunction on the teams prayed for. COURT OV KING'S BENCH, JULY S. FENNEL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF .RENNELp AGAINST THE lISH P OF LINCOLN. This was an action of Quare impedit, which came be fore the Court uf.on a writ of error from the Common Pleas. The plaintiff claimed, as administratrix of her husband, a right to present to a living in the defendant's diocess, which became vacant in the lifetime of her husband, who was one of the Prebendaties of Salisbury, having, in right of his prebend, the power of presenta tion, which, however, he never exercised. The defend ant, being of opinion that the right of presentation, not having been exercised by the deceased pi ebenclary, de •olved upon his successor, and was not to be considered as any part of the per►onal estate of the deceased, re fused to induct a ClOsytnan whom the plaintiff, as ad ministratrix to her deceased husband, had presented, upon which she brought her action in theCommonP•eas, where the question was argued, and that Court decided against her claim in favour of the defendant. Flom this decision she appealed by uric of error to the Court roKing% Bench, where the question was argued some time since, and the case stood °vor for judgment, there being a difference of opinion on the Bench. This mot n lit their Lordships delivered their opiniun seriatim : the three puisne Judges were in favour of the pl.intiff's right to present, and she accordingly had the judgment of the Court iu her favour, reversing the judgment of the Common Pleas, althirgh .ord Tenterden's opinion coincided with the judgensuitif that Court, and was in favour of the defendant.. TNt %IWO *ohm? RIGBY WASON. Mr. BROUGRAW and Mr. ERSKINI shewed cause against a rule Nisi for a criminal information obtained by the Attorney General in consequence of a letter the defendant wrote to Mr. Dawson, an attorney, abusing him, and challenging him to fight. Mr. Daw son, in his professional character, had called upon the defendant to make inquiries concerning the amount and particulars of his property, that he might afford correct information to a Gentleman who was the father a young Lady to whom Mr. Wason was paying his addresses. Mr. Wason now stated that he had been engaged to this Lady for five years, and that her father had, after this long. courtship, refused him, upon an objection made to his fortune ; and he could not help thinking that he had not been fairly dealt with by Mr. Dawson, for that his fortune amounted to 1,2001. a year. and he had professed his willingness to make a settlement to that amount upon the Lady. The de fendant also felt hurt at a letter which Mr. Dawson wrote to him, implying a doubt of his title to some land ; and under the impression that he was not fairly dealt with, he had written the letter complained of. The Learned Counsel would not attempt to Justify that letter, but they thought that Mr. Dawson was not entitled to the extraordinary interference of the Court, bat should beleft to the ordinary remedy. The Comm, however, intimated that the defendant's feelings and suspicions were no justification of the letter he had written; upon which Mr. ERSKINE begged of the Court to allow the mat ter to stand over, and Mr. BM:MOHAN suggested that it should stand over until to-morrow, with an understanding that the rule should be made absolute if a proper apology was not made. Lord THHTZEDII4....If Mr. Dawson is not satisfied. Mr. Baommam—l believe it must be so. Lord TENTIRDIN—The rule then must be made ab- solute Nisi, so that we are to hear no more of it ; but if satisfaction is not made, the rule for the information is to be considered to be granted. 1. I . 4,!„ CRIMINAL INIORMATION. Mr. E. ALDERSON moved for a rule Nisi for a ci iminal information against a Yorkshire MAgistrate, for alleged corruption, in committing two persons, named Rams den, to Wakefield House of Correction, for refusing to pay certain expenses awarded by him in favour of a constable named Wright, who complained of an assault. No notice of the motion having been given to the Ma gistrate—The Comm, for the present, refused the rule. THE Kt AGAINST THE CORPORATION Or QUINN • NORODOM Mr. Sergeant MEREWITEIR moved to make absolute a rule for an information, in the nature of a quo war rant°, against Mr. Green, for having exercised the office of Mayor of QUeenborough, font September, 1823, to September, 1824. Mrl Martavkr ihewed cause.—The objection to Mr. Green's election was, that he was not a good Jurat, and therefore not a good Mayor. The Corporation consists of a Mayor, four Jurats, and two Bailiffs; and a ma jority of the body mutt be present to make a good elec tion. Mr. Green had been a jorat from 1814 to the 12th of May, 1823, when he surrendered his office of jurat to become a witness. On the 20th of May, after' , he had given his evidence, he was re-elected to the same office; but it appeared that the body of the Corporation present at the election was not suffi cient, because there was only one of the two bai liffs present, and he was not a majority of the two. We therefore acknowledge that on the 20th of May he was wit well elected into the office of jurat, but we submit that he was well elected on the 9th of Arne, 1823, for upou that day another assembly was holden, at which the Mayor, the two Bailiffs, and two Jurats attended, and lie was then duly elected Jurat. A quo tearanto information had been obtained and filed against him for this interval of three weeks between the 20th of May and the 9th of June, for usurping the office of Jurat, and he has admitted the usurpation of his office for these three weeks, and pleaded the legality of his election on the 9th of Jane, 1823. The present application against him is fur having exercised the office of Mayor from the 29th of September, 1823; but there is no other objection to his election as Mayor, ex cepting the objection to his election as Jurat, which is now removed. Lord TILNTZBDIN.—The question is, whether the two juiats prevent at the election on the 9th of June as the majority of junats are sufficient, or whether all three jorats ought not to have been present, as the majority of the full body of four? Mr. MAIMAT—That is the question ; and the words of the charter are—"that it shall be lawful for the Mayor and the surviving or remaining Jurats and Bailiffs, or the major part of them, to elect, ttc." Mr. CAMPBELL, in support of the rule, said that the question depended qpon the construction f the charter t certain actions had been brought under some bye-laws, the validity of which would depend upon the legality of the Mayor. Lord Tstatzaogo—Can yoo try the question, whea tber he was properiy elected to the office of jurat, twice over.? Would it not be better that this rule be enlarged till the question of the jurat is determined? Mr. CAMPBELL, submitted, that then the other side should not proceed in the actions on the bye-laws. Mr. MAnovar refused to accede to this arrange. ment. The actions were concerning the oyster-beds and fisheries of the town, and were very important. Lord TENTERDEN—The rule must be enlarged; and if the prosecution in the quo warranto against the defen dant, as jurat, poses successful, then an information must be granted against him as Mayor. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Jinx 5. HENDERSON V. LIMAN. Mr. Sergeant WILDIC applied to the Court to restrict the plaintiff's right of costs in this case. The defendant's attorney had taken out a summons to stay the proceed- ings on payment of the debt and costs ; but the plaintiff's attorney, or some other person fot him, refused to agree to the summons, stating that the plaintiff claimed and was entitled to a larger sum than was proposed to be paid by the defendant. The defendant then paid the money he had offered into Court, when the plaintiff filed a declaration, which he afterwards took out. Under these circumstances, the Court decided that the plaintiff could not rec leer costs to any amount beyond those that had been incurred up to the time that the summons to stay proceedings was taken out. Their Lordships were glad that they had this oppor ' tunity'of expressing their opinion upon the practice which had been adopted in this cate, and which was now' become too general. It frequen ly occurred, that when summonses of this kind were t ken out, and the patties appea►ed before the Judge It thimbett, some young person who had vary probably been little rni re than a year in office, would 'come horn the .plaintitf.i and succeed in di,charging the summons, by inertly laying claim to a larger sum than was offered by the defendant. A Judge's hands were then effectually tled,i he could only advise the defendant to pay the money into Court, and when this Mal done, it frequently ha t .• pened that it was taken out again, and the defendant was probably saddled with the very amount of co.ts which the sole object of his summons was to get rid of. This practice wasgain;ng ground, but it must be stopped. Eel 40i CE 1/1111114ft% • ,f+4 - ,GurtimrAtr... WaitlM (rr, ewe journeymen shrWmakrts, *en before Mr. Aidefilitll WaITIIIIMI and Sr .Auant, with embezzling toms materials delivered to ra tio , *ark up. Mr. Chambetlain, a wholesalt manufacturer of shoes, appeared at the complainant, and stated that the prisoners had lodged in a room v.gether. On the 18th of June he delivered to Baron the materials for seven pairs of shoes, which he might have finished is two days. Some materials Were given to the other prisoner about the same time. After keeping the work by them for weevil days they decamped, but on Saturday night he obtained a clue to their hiding place, and apprehended them. He found Baron in a Coen on ShowhiU,lying between the bed sal the sacking in a garret. Two other masters appeared to make similar charges minim Baron, who is only 19 years of age, and there was a attend cow plaint against Carr, who pleaded guilty In the outset. They were sentenced each to two months' bard labour at the' tread-mill, with a caution that if they should hereafter be motion/ of similar misconduct, they would be certainly well whipped. Thomas Roseland, another shoemaker, was charged with stealing a metal watch and seals, and the upper leathers of three pairs ashen. The prisoner lodged with a workman in the same line, named Alexander Pollock, ice White Hart -court, Long-lane, and one day, while the latter had retired to a lower tonal to eat his dinner *lilt his spouse, the prisoner packed up hl% kit of tools, the week in hand, and the coraplainant's watch, and disappeared. The prisoner admintd that be stele the leather, but denied hat. lag carried °tribe watch. Mr. Alderman WAITHXIIII said he had had 36 prisoners before him on the previous day, and there were decidedly mere drunken shoemakers among them than of any other vocation—(A laugh) If there were honest men in it, be was sure they muff feel ashamed of their calling.—The prisenet was committed. p r ow* Bpii;n was b;cought up on a char g e of masoning a servant girl, while she was breathing a little fresh air at her master's dour about sieves o'clock on Monday night. The officer stated that as grinner knocked her clean down, but she declined combs; to the J sodeottioun. " What are your mid the Alderman. " A shoemaker, Sir," replied Ryan. " Another shoe maker I—Why, we had better go barefoot," ea. claimed the Alderman, " than give encouragement to such a sat disorderly fellows. You are the fourth shoemaker that has lam before me within this half hour. If the young woman is disinclined to prosecute you, I will not compel her; but I do hope that you will let this be a warning to you. Your offence would hive bees treated as a serious one at the Sessions, and you would have been sentenced to imprisonment. Consider yourself fortunate that you have not been compelled to dosage your trade of shoemaking toe mill-treading."—The prisoner was discharged. The next prisoner pet to the bar was also a shoemaker. i f gave his name Join Chemed. He was found staggering drunk in L. lane, Sndtkield, about half-put ten at night, by Bushnell, a watch. man, who offered to pus him on to the next watchman, and to en, till he arrived acids domicile in Saffron-hill. The prisoner, hoe. I ever, scorned to be so escorted ; and after Bushnell bad carets:ly tied up in his apron some leather be was carrying, be staggered stu About half au hour afterwards he was found ha Smithfield covereil with mud, and stripped' by thieves of his hat and shoes. He vu then placed on a hurdle, and curled to the watchhouse by tive guardians of thenight, with a view to his personal safety. " How mach de you get when you stick close to your last?' said the Alderman. " But I can't keep close," replied Connell ; without explaining. however, whether this sews (tan want of employ or the love of strong rink. The Alderman again pot his question, but the prisoner again shirked it; and the Magistrate had to learn from other quietus that Connell could snake a pair of boots aday, whereby be toad earn lis.—The Alderman dismissed hint with an admonition. " In the coarse of the day two lads, who also claimed to be N. lowers of the " Ifiati• craft," were committed to the treadmill for a month, on suspicion of frequenting the streets, with intent to amen* felony. THWAITIS L TOSTZR. In this ease a rule was obtained a few days iinee, calling on the plaintiff's attorney to spew cause why the judgment that had been given in the action should not be set aside, on the round that he had not given the defendant proper notice of trial? The defendant, in his affidavit, stated that the attorney had in the first instance given him notice of trial, but had subsequently coun termanded it ; that after having given this counter mand, he pr, , ceeded with the cause, and carried it into Court, where he obtained a verdict:The defendant went on to state in his affidavit. that he believed he had a good defence ti the action, sad had he been apprized of the intention of the plaintiff to carry it into Court, he had little doubt but he could have effectually answered . the case. Mr. Sergeant WILDE this morning shewed cause against the rele, and produced the affidavits of the at torney and his clerk. The latter swore that he had served the notice of trial, and that he had never served any countermand, but, on the contrary, a continuance of the first notice. The attorney swore that the coun termand which had been produced wai not in his hand writing, or in that of any of his clerks, nor had he ever sanctioned any countermand whatever, and if any had been served on the defendant with his name attached, it must have been forged. Upon the strength of these affidavits, the COURT discharged the rule. COURT OF ADMIRALTY. Jinx S. THIL EsTsaY CAIRN/. This was a suit brought by the owners of the fishing smack Minerva, to recover from the owners of the brig Betsey Cairns damages for the loss of the former ves sel, which was sunk by collision with the latter. The Betsey Cairns, a collier, in ballast from London to Shields, on a night in December last, met on entering the Wold, the Flora, a Dutch galliot, with the Minerva in tow, this vessel having last her rudder. The Betsey Cairns lulled to avoid the Flora, but bore up immedi ately afterwards, supposing the vessel astern of the Flora to be at anchor, there being no light on board, acid no sail set. The bows of the two vessels came con: sequently into contact, and the Minerva was run down. Very conflicting evidence was given by the persons pro. sent, some deposing that the witid was in one direction, some in another ; some asserting that the night was den and starlight, others that it was dark and foggy. After hearing Dr. LusutNotos anJ Dr. DODSON for the owners of the Minerva, Lord Stolen'. (who was assisted by Trinity Masters) declined hearing the other side, and decided that this was not a case of damage, but an unfortunate acci dent, owing, in, a great measure, to the absence of proper persons on board the Minerva, and to there being no light and no sail set in that vessel. He there fore pronounced that the other party were not to blame: they had effectually vindicated themselves. He dis missed them, but without costs. This was a case of salvage. Three small vessels Itad salved the Commerce when upon a sand off Har wich. The cargo was worth 5,00 W. and the tender was 1001. . which the salvors refused, as insufficient. Lord STOWiLL declined hearing Counsel on either side; he bad read the papers, and he thought the ser vices rendered had been short, and not laborious. He pronounced the tender fair ; but he, nevertheless, con demned the owners of the Commerce in the salvors' costs and expenses. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Jurr S. DOS, ON THE DISMISS 07 TM! ST. ICATHSSINS . B DOCK COM lA NT, V. SA RI RAN T. This was an action of ejectment, brought by the D. rectors of the St. Katherine's Dock Company against the defendant, to recover possession of some premises which had been conveyed to the Dock Company. The premises in question are situated in a place called Dark Entry, in the precinct of St. Katherine's, and , were for. merly in the possession of a Mr. Robinson, who con. veyed them to the Dock Company, for the use of the intended docks. Sarjeant, 'the defendant, occupied a pan of the premises, and paid eight shillings per week , for the same. A regular notice w4s served upon bits on the 19th May, to quit on the following week, but he refused to leave the premises. An action of ejectment was therefore brought. For the defence, it was contended that the defendant bad no right to leave the premises until he had received sr liberal compensation, and he grounded his claim upon the Act of rulitunent, which states, that the tenanti at will, as well as the owners and occupiers of the lan4, are entitled to a remuneration for the loss of their premises, Sm. On the other side it was argued, that if tenants at will refused to give up premises atter they had received notice to quit, by the Act of Parliament the Magistrate of the district had the power to issue his warrant, and turn those persons out of the premises. The LOAD Cum Bosom was of opinion that persons who held possession of premises which were required for any improvement of the description alluded to, were not entitled to any compensation for the loss of those premises, unless the term for which they had contracted to occupy the premises had not expired. The Jury, therefore, under the direction of the Learn ed Baron, returned a verdict for the plaintiffs. In the eleventh century the learned seen of Spain were divided in their preference for the Latin. or the Mosarabic ritual. The spirit of chivalry which then prevailed, permitted not the difficulty to be enlightened otherwise than in leaving the decision to two noble knights. Don Ruiz de Mai tanzi, knight of theMosarabic ritual, overthrew the Don Quixote of the Latin ritual; but as the laws of chivalry decided not positively, tha t a ritual must be proscribed because its knight was un hot sed, the two ri uals were subjected to the fiery ordeal, it not being considered possible that the sound of one should perish in the flames. Both, hoe ever, were con-, sumrd, and the dispute remain: d undecided. By degrees the Latin ritual got the preference, and if any blight alter wards presented iiim%elf to maintain the Mesarabic, it was the knight and not the ritual that was thrown into the fire. BOW-STREET. Yesterday, Mr. Stewart and his wife, a respectable old Scotch couple, appeared at this office, to aditht a domestic broil. Mr. Stewart was accused of assaulting his wife, and putting her life e jeopardy. On the usual oath being administered, Mrs. Stewart raised up her hands after the manner of testificatioa adopted by per• mina belonging to the Church of Scotland ; and The Magistrate (Sir It. Basins) inquired if she profaned the tenets of that Church 7—lndeed I do, replied the old Lady, and your Worship will be satisffed of the fact, on reading t►is letter. Sir R,. gam received the letter, and, on reading it, buns into an immoderate fit of laughter,and declared, that, although be Mal in the daily habit of reading extraordinary effusions, that that epistle beat them all hollow. The folks,* ie a Copy s a '" National Scoca Church, June 23, il!7. " Menu , Bets, —Ham an earnest desire to became s 4 ciliated with the persons of ail the Members of the Church within oar district, In order to the fulfilmeut of the trusts in which we are pined by the Great Head of the Church for your spiritual tow Wien and edification in the LOUD, we do affectionately and earnestly rola* yea to IMO us along with the other brethren in the diarict pled whim , • emorelght, at the arena& House of the Niched Smooth Chink, es Saturday next, June 10, at seven o'clock le he evellag. EDIVALO IMMO. " Assume Perms, Elder. " Theme Gastineau, Deacon.* This letter was a aptly lithographed circular, and was directed to Mrs. &ewart. As non as Sir Ibestaiao Bowe had tecovered his gravity, he (paired whether the old Lady had been to the meeting ? Mrs. fitewan-.06, undoubtedly, Sir ! It was a n.ost comfort able sight. Sir IticnaariWell, well, never mind the sight, but return to the assault. Mrs. &ewart then stated, that she and her husband bad bees is London for upwards of as years, during which time, and untilsof recently, they were as happy as happy could be. A decided alit lamentable alteration, however, had become visible in her husband's behaviour, and instead of the kind and *affectionate manner in "Wei he was wont to violent, and his language, which formerly was chaste as tormenter, had become painful even to listen to. On the previous Sunday night, while sitting at their supper, he abruptly Jumped fi oat ha seat, snatched a boos from the dial:, and flung it at het head, which was severely cut by the blow ; in addition to this he had beaten Id most unmercifully. And to what do you attribute this change? Inquired the :Vas** trate.—lnsanity, your Worship, answered Mrs. Stewart; fur to nothing else can I ascribe it. Well, Sir,. old Sir Rinser.," addreuing Mr. Stewart, and what have you to iay to ell this ?—Nothing, Sir—nothing, respu::ded the Gentleman; I am quite unconscious of the business ; my wife nay speak the truth, and no doubt does, but I am unconscious of every thing. Alai of the bone, too? asked the Magistrate. —Certainly, Sir— it was a very small bone, and I had no intention--- What then you are conscious after all? observed Sir Mous°. No, Sfr Ri chard; no, lam not. I got a bad cut on the head some time since, and I am in consequeoce at Limo suconicious. The Magistrate, however, ordered him to hod bail, and there the MUM, ended for the present. MARRIED. At Auchtermairnie, the Rev. Robert Brown. Iklinitter or Largo. t) Elisabeth, daughter of the late Christopher Lundiu, Eby. a DIED. H. H. Hunt, Est. the Mayor of Waterford, of fever. The !I"' tallty of the Civil Officers to truly deplorable in that city ; for within the last fourteen months the grave closed on Alderman Snow, late Mayor; Alderman Briscoe, Mayor elect; Alderman Earteott Deputy Mayor; and now Alderman Hunt, who's death le WI much regretted In Waterford and its neighbourhood. MAILS.-' 'HIS DAY. MIL DM Dublin 1 0 SVaterLad 1 0 Govrusay and Jersey 1 0 Lisbon 1 0 Honagbadee 0 0 Buenos Area 0 1 Holland 0 0 •aa. ties. France 0 0 Hamburg 0 i Flanders 0 0 Sweden 0 I Malta 0 0 Leeward Islands 0 0 JArnaica 0 HI G H - W4TB4lit LONDON-BRIDGR 'lO NIOR.I: O Vi. Morn sf ' 10 annul.% Aitcr 9 . Atterma • 46 nunucc• ..ft.r 9 lantoon: Printed and Pubbaked by Joni, Maury. the 1 . 1.4 4 .'“ f I IR the Si•m 01 PLC Is No. 1, Pickett-place, 'ltture- 4 Pla NNW s LlNKibi • VIL rele. room I in , woo -ka- I I k 01 t i t /WWII high lb° Ms& digir at odd spout N 0.7. h 11 imievidg diem 61 wed. MIN It' wick ti Gnaw Prorte 1 M lisisCi arra lb*" h licl4! ilidi set Jinni become t o clots dooi of seglea •* Elie Pike Muni iti P lisli .N. -.4...