Star. — London, England, 1820-11-28 00:00:00

• . e , - -. L.,..._ ----- 14 *iikve , ben special, that the defend** ;night have was, that the Jury should be allowed to Grid Riese- an& CD Use& of bringing I writ of error, and Mi ni verdict of guilty or not guilty, and were not te- ' theilleint decided on solid it sent. On Me stricted, .as before that Statute . , to finding only the " shoe were different opintpues In the case kifl fact, of publicOon and the truth of the inuendoes.-m- the King and Watson, where the taming in a letter It was still the duty of the Judge to explain and de.;* at Islington WAS taken by Lord Ellebboroegh, at ride on the law. The fourth objection was, that his 11/iii rms. as a proolof publication, had never been address to the Jury was unjust. He was sorry this 'reconsidered. Neither had the similar case of thel point had been made, not on his own account, - but !King e. Williams. But there was the case of the on account of the Gentleman who had made the ob- I King o. Collet ; which was an indictment for publish. servation ; a ho, he was convinced, had done it in the ing forged stamps. Here the stamps were forged in heat of the moment ; and no man had more reason London , and sent to Bath for use. Collet was in. to ask indulgence for opinions so uttered, than the dicted afterwards for publishing in Middlesex, and individual who was then•addressing them: but for was convicted. A Writ of Error was brOught, when doing an act of injustice, he hoped those who best seven out of the twelve Judges thought the publi knew him would acquit hi% of the charge of ever cation was in Middlesex, but the other five were of deliberately or intentionally doing so ; and he was a contrary opinion; and the consequence was, that convinced, from the knowledge he had of the Learned , the verdict of guilty was never acted on. This point Gentleman who had so charged him, that the accuser iof publication, therefore, could not be taken as set had, on reflection, felt more pain for having made ' tied and determined beyond doubt. But ithad been said the accusation, than the accused had from the accu- that as the writing had taken place in Leicestershire, cation having been made. In addressing , the Jury, even allowing the publication to have been in Mid he had certainly said, that for the defendant, a man dieser, the offence of writing and publishing consti of high rank, of great fortune, of transcendent talent, tuting but one offence, might be tried in either county. and of most extensive influence in the country, he On that subject he had great doubts. The Learned could find no excuse. He told the Jury, the question Judge then proceeded,to cite several cases in sup they.had to consider was, whether this was a publi- port of his opinion—that two offences, committed in cation addressed to the passions of the multitude, or different counties, and different in magnitude, if was it such sober reasoning and discussion .as was taken separately and together, could not be taken as allowable, in a free Go qernment like Our's, on the one offence, though joined in the same record ; and acts of our Rulers ? If they should be of opinion the though, if taken together, forming but one offence, publication was sober reasoning and fair discussion; could not be tried in one county. Here the charge then it was not a libel. If, on the contrary; . they was for composing, writing, and publishing: - but only should consider it addressed to the p4ssions of the the writing and composing in this case had been people, then it was a libel, and they wmild find it proved; and, taken without publication, was but a such. The Liberty of the Press went so far• as vi lesser offence. For this reason, therefore, he was of sanction all such publications as were intended to in- , opinion the present verdict could not stand. It must stru,...: and inform the people ; but it would not jus- either be altered in its shape, or the Rule for a new tify attempts to inflame the multitude. Vituperation trial must be now made absolute. . went beyond the Liberty of the Press in the most free . The Cuter...kayos was of opinion, that in this country .hat ever existed ;. and had been made suit; Case the. Rule fbr a new trial ought to be discharged, ject to the laws of every Government, however fret and thatihepresent verdict should stand. His Lord and liberai. Such publications must necessarily be ship asen prhceeded to state the grounds on which so dealt with, as they went to destroy private chit- belame to thivdecisien." There was abundant proof racter, or to encourage riot and rebellion. S ich was th a t drelibel. was written in Leicestershire. It was the opinion entertained by him at the trial,. and such said that the prosecutor Might to have called Mr. remained his opinion now. He would not apologist Bicker-staff; but it:appeared that ) until the trial, the for having occupied so much of the time of the Court: prosecutor did not know the paper had ever been in iz was the duty of a Judge to deliver his opinion, and Mr. Bickersear slands,thoush to the defendant this to state tin: ground of it ; and he was now of.opiuion was a fact inevitably within his knowledge. He might no new trial should be granted. . have called Mr: Bickersteff, who would have stated Mr. Justice lloiatoto, after giving the fullest con- how, where, and, in wliat mlinner he received the sideratipn to all the arguments advanced on this im- paper. The paper was written on the 24d, at Kirby portant question, was decidedly of opinion the rule Park, 100 miles from London and on the 25th the con.; for a new trial ought not to be made absolute. He tents appeared in most of the London Papers.--. was of opinion that the offence might be tried in the Sir Francis, for anything which appeared, still re county in which the libel was written; and in giving maining in Leicestershire. If there could be any this opinion, he was not called on, in the preitut doubt that the paper was delivered from the hands case, to decide as to the effect in a case in which the of Sir Francis in Leicestershire, then there ought to alleged libel might have been stolen from the closet be a new trial ; but if there were - no doubts, then the or desk of the writer, and published without his con- verdict ought not to be disturbed. He did not think sent. In this case, however, he thought there was there were any grounds for doubt; and he did not such presumptive evidence, as justified the Jury in think a new trial should be granted, for the purpose finding the publication to have taken place in Lei- of inquiring into some special facts, put upon the ver cestershire. The Learned Judge proceeded at consi- did ;as to the charge and summing . up of the Learned derable length to comment on the, arguments of the Judge, he could not but consider it as perfectly cor-. Counsel on both sides, and declared his opinion, that rect. But it had been said, Kitby Park was near the the verdict was right, and that there ought not to be border of another County, and that it was possible a new trial. the defendant might have taken the paper in his Mr. Justice BAYLEY agreed in part of the opinion pocket into that County, and there have given it laid doer, by his Learned Brothers. It had been said to Mr. Bickerstaff. He considered this as highly im in argument, that the defendant should have been al- probable, but he would allow it to be the fact ; and lowed to go into evidence of the late transactions at he would certainly say, that the defendant might be Manchester. lie was most decidedly of opinion.the tried and found guilty of the whole charge in the Judge did perfectly right in rejecting that evidence. County of Leicester. The composing. writing, and So, as to the objection to the Juage s having .ex- publishing, were all one offence, constituting one mis plained the law to the Jury, it was his duty to do demeanour, and might be tried inthe County in which so, and it was also the •duty of the Jury to take the any one of these acts had been done. His Lordship law from the Judge. If the law was wrong as laid proceeded to cite authorities from the Year and Text down by the Judge, the error might be remedied by BoOks in support of this opinion. Amongst other an application for a new trial; but if the Jury, acting on cases, he cited those of Bulmer, the King and their own judgment, should act wrong, and acquit a Briscow. Next, as to the objection that:the Judge had defendant, the injustice done to the Public could not refused to admit evidence of the transactions which be remedied. On these points he agreed with his took place on the 16th August, at Manchester, and Learned Brothers ; but he must confess he bad diffi- proof that some of the King's subjects had lost their culties as to the point of presumption of publication lives there: the case of the seven Bishops had been in the county of Leicester, on the evidence as it at mentioned in support of this objection, but that case present stood. The letter was written on the 22d of was different, as the evidences tendered were Acts of August, and Mr. Brookes states that he received it Parliament. The King v. Horne had also been cited from Mr. Bickerstaff on the 24th, in London or Mid- iu support of the right of the defendant to have this dlesex. How it reached Mr. Bickerstaff did not ap- evidence • but here the defendant conducted his own pear ; there was no evidence that he lived in Leices- cause, and on the Counsel for the prosecution ob. tershire; or was there at or about that time. There was jetting, Lord Mansfield said, " You had better let no evidence, of a positive kind, that the publication him call his evidence ;" but this could not be taken took place in Leicestershire; bat the Learned Judge as an authority against an opinion of the Judges de told the Jury they might presume the delivery open livered iu the House of Lords. His Lordship con, in Leicestershire to Mr. Bickerstaff. Now it struck chided his observations by defending the course taken him there were not grounds suffieient for that pre- by Mr. Justice Best in his address to the Jury at the mamption, yet it ;ended to influence the Jury.. That trial, and concluded by declaring his opinion, that Juries might act on.presumption was true, but there the Rule for a new trial should be discharged. must be a prima fade case to. merit such pease,- The Rule was discharged accordingly. tion. Was there such a case made out in chitcase? The Socic-rroiLGswestar. said, as they had not The prima facie case assumed here was, that the let- required the attendance of Sir Francis Burdett from ter was delivered to Mr. Bickerstaff in Leicestershire, day to day, he would not, perhaps, be immediately and delivered open. It was the ditty of the prose- acquainted with their Lordships' judgment. Under cutor to make out theprimailisese ease. Had be done these circumstances, he wished now to state, that so ? Had he called any evidence to attempt to there was no intention of praying for judgment until, establish such prink: finis case? And would next Term. a Grand Jury have presumed such a fact upon the THE /IRO V. EDMONDS AND OTHERS." evidence adduced by the prosecutor in this case? The Sot ictroa-GENsular, said, the Court would And thotigh` this• case tame before the Court on a recollect the defendants had applied for and obtained criminal information, filed by the Attorney-General, a Rule for a new trial, on an objection to the mode yet surely that circumstance would. not alter the of striking the Jury. It now appeared, that not only rules of evidence: The Attorney-General, before had they failed to serve the Rule, but it was not even filing this information, must believe he had a prima drawn up. He was, therefore, in a situation to pray facie case of publication in Leicestershire, and he for judgment ; but as he suppo sed the delay originated ought to have been prepared with evidence of that in some mistake, he would not now pray for judg • fact at the trial.' Mr. Bickerstaff should have been went, if the defendants would undertake to serve called to say whether he received this letter from the their Rule on the first day of next Term. defendant in Leicestershire or not. . It appeared to him, Mr. DENMAN, on the part of the defendants, ac that it was a part of the case on the part of the Crown, cepted the forbearance of his Learned Friend, and the and that the Crown ought to have called Mr. Bicker- case accordingly stands over. staff; and he could not but consider his Learned Bro- THE XING V. ORZATHRAD LIWIS. . , they as mistaken in . directing the Jury, without that The Scuacrroa-GENERAL prayed the judgment of • -evidence, to presume the publication in Leicestershire. the Court on the defendant, convicted of publishing, • A Jury ought not to be asked to decide on conjec- a seditious libel, of and concerning the Manchester tune when they could have proof. The Jury ought Meeting, which appeared in the Coventry Paper , of never to invade the province of the Judge in decid- which the defendant is Editor. ing on the law ; neither ought the Judge ever to in- Mr. Justice BEST read the Report of the Trial, fringe on the privilege of tbp Jury to decide on which came on at the Summer Assizes for the county matter of fact; but the next question, allowing it to of Warwick. The libel was calculated to excite per have been delivered in Leicestershire, would be, how sons to rebellion, by stating that the Manchester was it delivered, was it open or sealed ; if sealed it Yeomanry Cavalr y: were murderers. It also reflected was a close delivery, and was that a publication ? grossly on the King for having approved their conduct. He did not mean now to say it was or was not; but The defendant put in an affidavit, complaining, he would say, that in that case the verdict should amongst other things, of the mode adopted in-striking his Jury by the Sherif. The affidavit 134 reasf,.the defendant proceeded to address- He declared, he did not consider he had been of any crime against society, in ;the expression oft, his political opinions. He had been made-the victim of a foul conspiracy, in the manner in which his Jury had been struck ; and as to the libel for which he was now to receive judgment, he must submit to • their Lordships he was not the author; and, indeed, that the original author had not been punished at all. He did not now stand before their Lordships to re cant his political opinions, but to avow them. The defendant then proceeded to defend the principles which he bad avowed, and declared, had he to live his time over again, he should again act as he had done. Even in his dungeon he should be supported by the reflection that he had done his duty; and, de prived of the society of those whom he loved and by whom he was beloved in return, should seek for con solation in the doctrines of Christianity, being well aware that— " Virtue may be assail'd, but never hurt; Surpris'd by unjust force, but not enthrail'd; Yea, even that which mischief meant most harm, Shall, in the happy trial, prove most glory But evil on itself shall back recoil, And mix no more with goodness ; when, at last, Gather'd like scum, and settled to itself, It shall be in eternal restless change, Self-fed and self-consumed if this fail, The pillar'd firmament is rottenness, And earth's base built on stubble !" He would not detain their Lordships longer by ob servation, but stood to receive their judgment. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL shortly addressed the Court, and called their Lordships attention to some passages of the libel, which contained vat ions reflec tions on the Prince Regent's letter to the Manchester Yeomanry. . Mr. Justice BAYLEY pronounced the judgment of the Court on the defendant, which was, that he should pay 4:50 to the King; be imprisoned two years in the jail of Warwick; and at the expiration of that time to find security for his good behaviour for five years, himself in L'2oo, and two sureties in £lOO each, and to be further imprisoned till such security was found and such fine paid. The defendant asked a question of the Bench, as to what should be the nature of his imprisonment ? Mr. Justice BAYLEY said,. the Court could make no order as to the mode of imprisonment ; but the :§heriff would no doubt act properly. ' isouematta 25.—THE KING V. THE MAYOR AND COR PORATION OF EVESIIAM. This was an application for a Mandamus against ithe Mayor and Corporation of Evesham, for refusing to admit—. Garrott, a Free Burgess of that Borough. The COMMON SERJEANT applied this day to have the Rule enlarged to the first tour days of .the next Term.—The application was granted accordingly: THE ICING V. JOHN HUNT. This defendant, who is a respectable Custom-ho Use agent, was brought up to receive sentence, having suffered judgment to go by default, to an indictment founded on the 24th Geo. 111. c. 17, s. 2 and 3, for refusing to swear whether or not certain packages shipped by him from the Port of London were on Alien account, whereby the Corporation of the City. of London were deprived of their package duties, ' granted by the charter of Charles the First, and contrary to the above-mentioned statute. An objection was taken in arrest of judgment to the form of the indictment; but it was over-ruled. In the course of the discussion, a doubt arose as to what was meant by " goods shipped on Alien account," as expressed by the - statute; and the Court having suggested that this was a question which ought to have been tried by an issue at law, it was agreed on all hands, that tl.is case should stand over until such an issue was tried. beei CRIMINAL INFORMATION. Mr. SCARLET? applied for a criininal information against the Lad of Westmeath. He did this on the affidavit of rGentleman named Wood, and on that of another Gentleman named Stuart, which stated, Eiat'domestic circumstances having caused a separa tion between Lord and Lady Westmeath, his Lord ship settled an annuity on his Lady, and Mr. Wood, at his request, became one of her Ladyship's trustees. Some time after, his Lordship being desirous to set that deed aside, proceedings were taken for that pur. pose in the Court of Chancery, in which Mr. Wood, as one of the Lady's trustees, was necessarily made a party. In the course of these proceedings, Mr. We therall, her Ladyship's Counsel, in an address to the Chancellor. stated some observations as haling been made by Mr. Wood, and the report of this speech appearing in an Evening Newspaper, Lord West meath felt offended at them, and sent a message to Mr. Wood, requiring him to make a public declara tion contradictory of those passages of the Learned Counsel's speech. Mr. Wood declined doing this ;1 upon which Lord Westmeath sent him the following' ' message by a third person :—" If Mr. Wood does not contradict this statement, he is the greatest liar that ever was, and the greatest rascal that ever dealt with ,an honest man." The Noble Lord had since published that he had sent this message, and the de ponent delared his belief, that his Lordship's sole in tention had been to provoke him to fight a duel. The Court granted a Rule to skew cause. JENKINS V. THE WEST MIDDLESEX WATER-WORKS COMPANY. Mr. BROUGHAM moved the Court for a Rule to shew cause why a mandamus should not issue against the defendants in this case, requiring them to conti nue their communication of water to the premises of the plaintiff, and to other premises situated in the same district. The application, Mr. Brougham said, arose out of the course pursued by the Water Com panies, to enforce the payment of enhanced rates, of parcelling out the Metropolis into districts, each to be exclusively supplied by one Company ; and the question for decision was, whether the Companies -could legally withhold a supply of water for refusal to pay such enhanced rates? The complainant's rates were increased from £l6 15s". to £45 a-year, nearly 270 per cent. and because he refused to enter into a contract to pay them, his pipes had been cut off, and he was'now deprived of means of procuring a supply of water.—Rule granted. TIRE KING V. JANE CARLILE. Mr.Guattax said, his friend Mr.. Hill had obtained, a Rule for quashing the information in this case against Mrs. Carlile, on the grounds of irregularity. On looking over the affidavits, he found it would be impossible to resist the application. The Rule for quashing the proceeding was made absolute. SPbß i tiNO INTELLIGENCE. BETTIiNG AT TATTERSALL'S YESTERD IY. ODDS ON RACES TO COME. *soar. 118 to 1 art Ch3rm 22 to 1 apt Lilucher colt 25 to 1 agst Lanchcapc. 1 14 to 1 ape Onstavai 16 to 1 apt Parasol 16 to 1 asst Thoth 16 to 1 apt bro. to Andre w Oaea.-5 to 1 apt My Lady. 6IDDLIOVORTIC Ito II apt &limn I 6to I agst TROTTING MATCH. On Friday *reek, Messrs. BMICKUMIN and :Tuacce. SAY, of Orford-street, engaged to trot, for a wager of Silty bay mare, fifteen hands high, four Miles in fourteen minutes, lon the Lea-bridge-road, which was pet-totaled with great eaq. bating thirty-four seconds to spare. Betting at eating, 6to • against her. HUNTING. Lord At. - eon's Rix Hounds met at Gopsall.on Friday st....niett they soon found sly Reynard, and after brushing . him :ea-at:- through the wood, he crossed the road to e t GorseS front thence to the village, where he teas 100 t... They timid a seem 2 fox at Orton little Gorse, which instantly broke away, leadir them again towards the village, where he tunied to the right ft r the upper side of Orton large Gorse, which he gallantly seirtce ; leaving rwycross to the left, crossing the Acherstone road to Bibson Mill, over the brook to Butt House, bearing to the right up Sibson fie-Ids, leaving Attetton and Drayton oil tket tight to Lindley Gorse, which he paescl through to 11zhato toed Stole., in a line for Ilurbage Wood by M i ddleton; jut nefore he reached the latter place he doubled to the rem ~Ver a tine couter, sloe a to the Hinckley road, which lie crossed at the rive mite sconc, leaving Widdington Wood to the right t pressed hard, h_ lo•et on his line for Nuneaton to the Coveatry road, where he turnzd• to the left and was killed, atter a run of one hoar ees. threecpen tees, opposite the old road to Lutterworth, near the 111 u -row Inn. This gallant young pack displayed peculiar steadiness ai.d some excellent hunting during this chece, which repeatedly callee! forth the praises aid admiration of the field. BERKELEY EIENT.— A fine stag was turt.ed out at half-past tee yesterday morning, in the neighbourhood of Ilerrow-on-the ifill,by Lord Bummer. Ile struck off towards I larrow, a circuitous route through the covers towards Edgee.etre ; then Made his way through the meadows at a vista,..' L.::• Burroughs, Hendon, towards Child'shill, where he e see: cover, and the dogs were for some time at a loss; bu. :1, terwards got fresh scent, when the animal broke cover, it: lee el; towards West End, takieg• the meadows on the side tti rotte-hfll, and after many turnings and windings, entered tine Metropolis by-the New-road, Banc' ..s, dogs et d huntsneet cs sulk. The novelty of the sight drew forth a motley mut. itiois of pursuers in full cry. Tilt stag crossed Mussel!-aquere, ms ran up the steps of a Gentleman's house in Aloteage.-eiree., Where it was capture!, breathless, but uninjured, atter a run of two hours and •a half. In less than two minutes itear:y the whole of the numerous field of sport onen made their appearance, and were highly gratified with the da- : 'a sport. The. Shrewsbury I hint, lest as 0. as numerously jttendeCi, the weather being. favourehle, and the sport capital. The com pany it the Ball, on Thursday evening, boasted of all the rank, beauty, and fashion of the town and its vicinity. Red-house Hunt, on U'eclneadar, 'was numerously attended, and excellent sport afforded, as well to the pedestrians as horse men. Upwards of 900 persors toll: wed the chat:eon foot. The hunt commenced at nitre : rod continued five het: XF, during which 'five separate chases ensu ed, and five hares were killed.. The day afforded excellent amusement to the eons cf Nimrod, many of whom particularly, distieguished themselves by einclefatigaiile riding and excellent leap.. At the clOse cf the , chace the corn , patty returned Id Mrs. BEATTIE'S litre where a,, exc. li. nt dint-er was .served up • after which many loyal t tests and. sentiments, including the King, Queen, and the rest of the Rooms Fetidly, were emitted • from the Chair (which was fillee by Weancor). The conviviality of the meeting was mi. Neigh:, red by some good sporting sentiments,epposite to the occasion, and concluded with several excellent songs. ' Thursday evening . a curious wager for 4.5 was at Mr. Stott s, the Six Ilell3, Dose-court, Lombard-wit - et ; :a baker widertook to stark' ttpo'a one leg for-three successive hours. witlitn - .4 either resting it on the ground, or reclining against other leg ; he performed the arduous task 'with .1;.- parent ease, and next day was able to puritie usual occupation; about 51. mote was collected for 11; tr. THE RESCUE OF TurEvEs.--Seven persons were exal fined at Marlborough-street Office yesterday, on a charge of being parties to the atrocious rescue of the thieves, a few days ago, in Gie.rt Russell -street, and wounding Marsden, the jailer; their names are, Thomas Cope, William Soarrow, James Stanly alii:s Jack Tilly, John Watts, William Jones, George Har ris, and John . Harris. Some of the prisoners were identified by persons whom they had abused with sa va&e violence, but they were all remanded to Friday. PLACARD CONSPIRACY.—The Gentlemen who dis covered the.proceedings of. Franklin, and the extent of his manufactory of placards, are persevering in their exertions and daily obtaining additional informa tion on that most infamous and extensive conspiracy. Mr. PEARSON on Saturday preferred an indictment before the Grand Jury, for High Treason, agair.st Franklin, alias - Fletcher, and the Jury found a Tra Bill. If ranklin is yet in England, where until lately be is believed to have been, it now becomes dangerous any person to harbour kim ; and we may hope that his arrest will be/he - means of affording some expla., nation to what we must consider a mysterious affair. TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAR. Sin—You have for many years announced, through the me dium of your well conducted and widely circulated Paper, the Establishment of the MEDICAL BOARD, instituted by the celebrated Dr. Comma, and assisted by eminent Surgeons sod Physicians of nearly forty years' experience—Masts. Cdoraa and Co. request you will have the kindness to inform you: Readers, the whole of their practice is now concentrated at Chg . - lotte House, Great Charlotte-street, Blackfriars-road, where se veral rooms are appropriated for consultation. The object 0.. this arrangement is, that every Case may have the opinion of Dr. Coos's and the whole Board ; and in order that the Paldic may be apprised of the above circumstance , _ so advantageous to them, you will be pleased to insert this Notice twice a week for one month.—By Order of the Board; I have the honour to remain, your obedient servant, ROBT. C. BELL, M.D. Sec. N.B. All I t etters addressed to Sir F. C. Daniel (Treasurer), are laid before the Board the same day. Medical Board, Charlotte House, Surrey, Nov. 6, 1220. BIRTHS. Nov. 26, at Hale, Lancashire, Mrs. J. J. Blackburne, of 3 daughter. Saturday se'nnight, at the Rectory House, Manniogford Ab• botts, the Ladg of the Rev. Francis B. Astley, of a daughter. MARRIED. On Saturday, the. 35th instant, at Lambeth Church, Le - le Finlayson, Esq. of Canterbury-row, Newington, to Anne 31.47. a. only daughter of the late Charles Penvrick, Esq. At Wrexham, on the 'lad initant, by the Rev. Robert Wocr.c Eyton, Vicar of Llangollen, the Rev. N. Roberts, of Trvrc&e' Montgomerphire, and Cae Glass, Oswestry, to Frances, 60 daughter of the late John Matthews, of Plas 13ostock, is ttC County of Denbigh, F.sq. On the 14th inst. Captain George Wyndham, R.N. tO!let daughter of the Kev.W. Roberts, Vice Provost of Eton Col Lie Lately; at I'ortchester, Mr. J. Kelsey, to Miss Maxwell. daughter a Mr. Maxwell, surgeon, of Yarehan DIED. Sunday sennight i ip London, W. Breretoo, Esq. of the S outh Pallant, Exeter, aged 6S, leaving property exceeding XL00, 00) '• Tuesday, Frederick, the youngest sou of Mr. Oke, suri.e° r ' Farnham, Surrey... _ -_ - -- - --- --s ____ HIGH-VATERat LOM DON •BILI DG IC T( ' - 'tit lIR ) Morning ' ••._. ..... - 30 minutes atter tt Aftcrnoon - 52 —....:- 5 *le• _~ LONIFON Punted AO published by I..rvm. l'cl‘ 14. Place, TtniVe-Yar. rui Nu .0113 A l ate tan find A.! on T was tl . Th. Out A Ysps marl i Maid 14300 e, Ans.vc Prier 4 Nob* tiff; It Tweet Coma : I 311 0: ve. ~/ao .'~l 1141 till pr wdod Be )140t4 et_ j Beau .314 it 8 1 Lido of .1 bias Hui lari will ion uPPL Prk p 'G~ Isl 11111