Star. — London, England, 1827-03-28 00:00:00

N • • %Kt t ak\\ \ • Oat Port of dot twoaajollieks4ti t tts and was ao IN appli to eso o be poor, old laws nder which tiaghbeets granted, _ ioose ' Ilkhrt loners were actuated by ho s e' atdsibP * t t Church ;bat if such hostility ezi.tei, it was create) by those who matte? observation. The Caholics mig ht subMit qu:etly to • ... for .11 Clurch of which they did Not pkess PLY - faith, but when they we e told that that Church was the gtearhar to the enjoyment of their rights , it was Natural that they should feel hostile towards it. and &sold do what they could to destroy that edifice.— Ther hostility might be blamed, but it was those who had so pertinaciously persisted in rejecting the claims of the people, who had dose everything in their power to increase that hostility, and done it too, though ad. mission to Parliament could not add one jot to the power of clic Catholics. whilst it might diminish their enmity towards the Protestant Church. The Earl of LONGFORD deprecated desultory con versati ins of this kind, but could not let unfounded as set tions be repented without denial, till from their fre quency they shout.' acquire a sort of spurious authority. The Catholic Question was usually looked at under two tau of view—one the general policy, expediency, or justice of the measure; and the other its tendency to tranqoilliste Iteland s the justness of both opinions he distinctly denied. it was 150 years since the existing restrictions had been passed to exclude the 'Catholics from political power. Parliament had had frequent opportunities since of considering the propriety of those eestrictions, and had every time judged that they were proper, and rejected every proposition to repeal them. When the law was thus proclaimed just by successive Parliaments during a century and a half, he did not see how the epithet of just could also be applied to thi claims of the Catholics. He did not object to a regular discussion; on the contrary, he thought that the more frequently those claims were discussed, the more clearly it would be proved that the continuance of the existing restrictions was just and necessary, and not intended to depress or to oppress the Catholics. But the introduc• tiun of the topic on every occasion, could only tend to increase irritation. He did npt know what other secu rity the Catholics could give, unless submission to an equal controul as Protestants. He knew from the ex perience of our own Church, how difficult it wastes; separate spiritual from political authority, and he did not believe that the ecclesiastical and political spirit in the Catholic Church could be kept more apart than in our own. On this conviction he should continue to oppose the Claims of the Catholics. Lot d HOLLAND said, that Vie Petitions only prayed for the repeal of the Leith Vestries Act, which had been passed last year, and not for that of the Catholic dis abilities. .-The Earl of LONGFORD wished that the respon• sibility of the agitation and hostility which had been created should lie on the right shoulders-..not on those who for 150 years had supported the existing restric tions, but on those who were making constant attempts to destroy those bulwarks of our Constitutien.—The Petitions were then read, and laid on the table. onarst TO THE DUX. AND DUCHESS OF CLARENCE. • Earl BATHURST moved, that the Duke and Du chess of Clarence's Annuity Bill be read a second time. • Lord KING thought that it would have been decent at least in the Noble Earl to give some reason why the income of their Royal Highnerses should be increased. But it teemed as though it was wished to smuggle the Dill through the House. Perhaps his Majesty's Minis 'tors thought the opportunity perfectly happy for such .8 measure, and as they were going to raise the price of hread, wished also to augment the amount of income? Was it on this ground, or was it because there was great distress amongst the manufacturers this year, and there would be as much amongst landlords the next ? -He did not exactly understand why the measure had been so long delayed in the other House. Was it because they waite4 to send it up till there should be an efficient Minister in this? Yesterday he almost thought that thst was the case, but to•day the appearance had changed. Thy were in tact like sheep without a shepherd, bleat ing every note in the gamut, from L sharp (if we heard •rightly, for with such notes in music, we confess our .sehres totally unacquainted) to a flat. The Noble Lord -' en remarked, that the present age was a golden age for Princes, Palaces, and Ireland. He said, that he had a Petition to present against the Bill, which he would •base done, it he had known when it was to be brought forward. Earl BATHURST appealed to the remembrance of .111 w Hors whether, when his Noble Friend (the Earl of :Liverpool) had moved an Address to his Majesty in irrtyly to his Majesty's Message respecting the allowance 'go their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of • Ittet, he had not stated to thew. Lordships everything erhich it was purported to do? He had said, that 90001. a year devolved to their Royal Highnesses in conse• (mace of the death ot the Duke ot York, and that it was proposed to add 90001. a year to that increase. Their Lordships had concurred unanimously in the Address of his Noble Friend, and he had a right to con ceive that they bad consented to this particalar aug mentation. This was the cause of his entering into no •eiplanation when moving the second reading of the Bill, as it only enacted what he bad stated, and what had met with the universal concurrence of the House. By this Act, the whole income received by the Heir Presumptive to the Imperial Crown of Great Britain and Ireland, would not exceed $5,5001. a year, whereas the provision for the late Princess Charlotte at a time when she good in the situation, not of Heiress Pre sumptive to the Crown, but of Heiress Presumptive to the Presumptive Heir to the Crown, was 60,0001. a year. The Bill was then read a second time, and ordered to be committed. CAPS CT GOOD ROM Lord KENYON presented a Petition from William Parker, late settler at the Cape of Good Hope, com plaining of the manner in wbch the Colony was con ducted, and of the heavy losses inflicted upon him through the interference of the Secretary to the Govern ment, Colonel Bird, and the influence of the Jesuits,— As the Petitioner had gone in 1820 to the Cape of Good pe with a colony of 250 persons to settle, and had &tome returned a ruined man, he (Lord K.) recommended Lis a se to the serious attention of their Lordships. Earl BATHURST said, that Mr. Parker had begun to make complaints soon after his arrival at the Cape of Good Hope ; that his allegations against the Govern sweat and its Secretary, Colonel Bird, bad been referred by his (Earl B.'s) orders to the Commissioners of En quiry, and that those Commissioners had reported on the subjectoiand declared those allegations to be un founded. Equally so was Mr. Parker's statement, that Colonel Bird had been removed from his situation in consequence of his (Parker's) allegations. Colonel Bird, had been removed us consequence of a serious misua , and it was one of the the . any, that when there was a certain number of persons of the same faith, an allowance should be made for a Miniver of the sans. persuasion to perform Divine Service. The manner in which Parker disclaimed the idea of having brought over a Catholic Minister, if he knew that he was addr,ssin a man of the Catholic persuasion, was highly culp But, as he had stated a k a before, all that individual's dons had bees sub. mined to the Commissioners, ar 0-repotted that they were without foundation. The Earl of CA LEDON contended that a more effi cient Officer than Colohel Bird had never been appointe I to any situation of the nature of that which he filled. The Nnb'e Earl then read an extract from the Re port of the Commissioners, in which they said— " that Mr. Parker's feeling of aversion for all who pro fessed the Catholic faith, had led him to entertain the most unwarrantable suspicions of Colonel &rd.* He (Lord Caledon) had also, to state, that C )lonel Brd wilt in England all last year, dniing which time Mr. Par. ker remained completely silent ; but that no sooner had the Colonel quitted the country than this Petition was presented. He regretted that he had no means of marking his horror and dislike of the attempt made to vilify the character of that Gallant Officer, or the con duct of the Catholics in (hitt instance. Earl ROSSLYN said, that the Petition could not be received, as it contained nil prayer. Lord KENYON said, thatit-prayed for inquiry. Alter a few words from the Marquis Of*Latisoown, The Earl of CALEDON moved that the Petition be rejected, which was agreed to on the question being put from the Wool)ack. CATHOLIC& ----- The Earl of BELMOBB presented Petitions from the Catholics of the counties of Permenagh and Tyrone, praying for the concession of their claims. He consi. dered himself relieved by the conduct of his Majesty's Ministers from any difficulties with respect to those claims. Ever since the year 1793 they had been +Diking concessions to the Catholics ; the principle had therefore been conceded, and all that remained Mere merely ques tions of amount and opportunity. The argument that it was itexpedient to relieve the Catholics from their disabilities extended to thi-, that the British Constitution was not calculated to be enjoyed by more than one• third of the population of the British empire. Re could noj accede to such a proposition as that, sod he was surprised that those who had gone so far in the path of concession, should now stop short and refuse. to admit the Catholics altogether.—The Petitions were thee read and laid on the table. testa. The Marquis of LANSDOWN gave astir% that as Friday neat he Amid move fur as nevem et the somber of Appeals sent frog► various Courts is ladla and Ceylooy obi of ibm taken arm them. The Earl of LORGPORD presented Petitioas front several Parishes in the Counties of Tyrone and Armagh, against*. Catbal lie aa the tabia,—Adjeerned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The gallery was not opened to she public this evening until five oclock,•in consequence of the ballibts which took place for the Marlborough and Banf hire Electing) Committees. The names of the defaulters absent at the ballot on Wednesday, and who had not attended, were then called over. Several were excused, in consequence of illness and other causes ; and the Hon. John ti. W. Forester, and another Hun. Member, were ordered to be taken into custoiy by the S leant at Arms. 11ARLIOROUSH P.ITITION• The following are the names of the Committee Gwent and ap pointed to try the merits of this Petitioe :—Th. lion. G. J. W. A. Ellis, Mr. Abel Smith, Mr. Robert Price, Sit Henri Hardinge, Mr. T. E. Een , p, Lord Marquis of Worcester, Alderman John Atkins, Mr. C. Mackinnon, Mr. C. P. Thornsoss. Lord Jas. Towishend. General Gamoyee, Alderman Thompson. &r James Graham, and Thomas G. 13. Esteourt. Mr. BELL presented a Petition from certain Occupiers of Land in the North part of Northumberland, praying for t►e pretealen of the tended interest. _ _ . I Mr. VAN HOB! RIG H presented a Petition frost the Climber' of Cominereo of Drogheda, praying that the duty is Coals ought be taken off. aanrmsrme :meson: The following Members were sworn, and appoisteJ of the Com mittee to try this Election Petition,—Mr. W. J. Denison, Lord P. J. Stuart, Hon. W. H. Laocelles, Mr. J. hL Dawson, Mr. Arthur French, Mr. J. D. B. Evans Mr. W. Beauchamp. Mr. Peel, Mr. E. H. A'Court, Mr. Abel It. attire. Mr. T. Alma, Mr. T. Chaplin, Mr.W. Henry Felloaes, Dr. Phillunore, and Sir G. Warrender. IBTORIO' PRISON& , Mr. Secretary PEEL said, the Hon. Member (Mr. Hume) had given notice of a motion respecting the Fleet and King's Bench Prisons, which he should be glad the Hon. Gentleman would put off to another day, that he (Mr. Peel) might have further time to con sider the subject, respecting which he had written both to the Chief Justice of the King's Bench and of the Common Pleas. He wished to set the Hon. Gentleman right with reference to what he said open a former oc casion, touching the conduct of the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. The Hon. Gentleman said, that fre- quent applications had been made to him with respect to the treatment of the prisoners, and the state of the prisons, to which he paid no attention. Now the Chief Justice distinctly told him, that no application was ever made to bins to which immediate attention had not been paid, and ■n inquiry instituted upon the subject. Mr. HUME said, he had not stated that all applica. tions were disregarded. He alluded only to the parti• cular case. The Petition had been forwarded to him from prisoners in the Fleet, and he advised them to apply to the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Peel), who said it did not belong to him to substitute any inquiry. He then told them to apply to the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas before he should present their Petition. They made the application, and for three days after no answer was returned. He then presented their Petition, and on the same day a person from the Chief Justice attended the prison, and instituted an inquiry. This, however, could not affect his motion, which would relate ptiucipally to the state of these prisons, and the effect produced oo persons committed for debt.--He should have no objection to put off his motion till Thursday next. Mr. Secretary PEEL said it now appeared that the Hon. Gentleman had not complained that all represen tations to the Chief Justice were unattended to. A de lay of three days took place, but an inquiry was insti tuted on the fourth, which proved that there existed na l indisposition to attend to complaints.—The motion was' then postponed till Thursday. IL= UMW& On the motion of General Dvrr, tt was ordered that there be laid upon the table of the Homan Account of the Number of' snows. 011 Me* night. Mr. Fawns Iknew gave notice of a motion, APR 1111 to prevent the. immolation of Hind** widows of their husbands. *rearmed a Petition from a person named Logan, If *ant of accommodation fir risonen in the Fleet to be printed. Gobs motion of Mr. fisarnaers, a return was ordered of the inialber of ships (and the amount of their tonnage, with the number of min and bnys employed in them) which cleared ont from the ports of the United Kingdom to foreign ports, from January, Intl, to January, ISt?. /TEAM 110.111. Mr. HENRY GRATTA N moved for a Renfro relative to the Voyages of his Majesty's Steam Packets from Holyhead to Howth, and from Minicar, to Liverpool; the farts for carrying passengers, hones, and carriages, together with the expenses fur building at Dindeary.—The maim was agreed to. IFILIEMDLT 110CLITIM On the motion of Mr. CelliTt/MT, a Select Committee was ap pointed tsetake into consideration the laws affecting " Friendly Societies,' and to report their opinions and observations thereupon to the tissue. A MOMS DI CaIITODY. The 11191 AMER informed the House, that Mr. Forester (sae of dse Mershon who had been abeam from the ballot on the slat lucent. aatiwinthad eat attended in his place this day) was then in the ettotadtotithe Serjetat nt Arms. It was thee stoyd and carried, that Mr. Forester Be discharged tke payment of lie fees. The Annual Dads' 11111waa read a &t ad don and passed. WET Or aaoYv RILL. Mr. SHADWELL moved the second reading of the Writ of Right Bill. Mr. D.W. HARVEY hoped that this motion would net be pressed, as a Committee of Inquiry was pro mised hereafter. The BM displayed much liberal feeling, but as it did not go much further, it was not a measure that would redound much to the legislative character of the Hon. and Learned Member. It limited the period from 60 years to SO years; but perhaps three such pe culiar cases did not occur in a year. As the Hon. Mem ber felt perhaps he must do something, he did not well know how less could be done. The subject was of import ance; its discussion would be most useful; but he felt as sured that no remedy was provided, and that the neces sity of passing fines was not dispensed with by this Bill. The Hon. Member then went on to point out the va rious modes of expense to which a party was put in levying a fine in the svery day practice of a woman giving up her claim to her portion of her husband's property. The process had to go through some six or seven offices before it was complete, and at an expense of twenty pounds. Now, let the House contrast this tedious aad expensive process with the simple one which was resorted w and held sufficient in cases of copyhold estate. There, if a . wife was dis posed to give up her claim on her husband's property, she might do so by goi g before the steward of the manor, and by taking hold of one end of a stick of which the steward held the other, (indeed a poker was made use of on some occasions) and by that means might signify- the alienation of her claim, and the steward's certificate to that effect was held sufficient proof of such alienation, and was as effectual for its object as the levying a fine in the Crust of Common Pleas. An easy and simple process for .the same purpose was known to prevail in several coy porate townr. It was the case in London, and in the town he had the honour to represent. There a Lady might go before the Mayor, and signify her intention to resign her claim, and the Mayor's certificate, for which she paid only a shilling, was a sufficient attestation of the fact. It would be an immense benefit to the pro prietors and purchasers of land to have some simple plan established, by which the conveyance of property' ' might be rendered mote sacu e, and less tedious and expensive. Mr. BERNAL said, the Act, as regarded writs of error, was most ridiculous, and ought to be considered. As regarded the transfer of property, it would hardly be Wigged, when it was considered what improvement we have made in legislation, that a man could not de vise freehuld property, to the value of only a. a year, without the presence of three witnesses, while he might devise copyhold without a single one. This was most disgraceful. He hoped the Right Hon. Gentleman op ' posoe would turn his attention to the system of con veyancing. He was aware that it 'might be supposed to be the interest of Government, on account of the Stamps, - kc. to oppose any such s'teration; but he felt confident the subject would not be neglected, when he recollected the half promise which had been given by the Right Hon. Gentleman, on a former occasion, and the efforts he had ars successfully made to consoli date the Criminal Code. The object could not be effected probably without a commission, the expenses of which, the Right Hon. Gentleman, in his careful and 'praiseworthy economy, might wish to avoid: but such a course would be found necessary on account of the difficulty of the inquiry, and the opposition likely to be offered by a class of antagonists that lived by the very perplexity, which it was so desirable to put an end to. I. conclusion, he begged to ask the Right Hon. Seeress Itary distinctly what were his intentions. Mr. Secretary PEEL said the Hon. Member had rightly understood what he said during the discussion on 1 the Chancery B IL He had not abandoned his intention ; he thought it necessary to institute an inquiry into the transfer of real property ; but that inquiry should be proceeded in with the greatest caution. He did not think there would be any obstruction offered to the de sired improvement by the legal profession; individually he had received from members of that profession the most cordial offers of co-operation. He had not yet thought of what might be the most effectual means of attain ing the desired object; but he at present did not see any objection to the Commission suggested by the Hon. Gentleman ; it being but fair if services of Gentlemen were required, that such services should be paid for.— There, however, might be proffers made of a gratuitous nature, and whether they were to be accepted or not on those terms was matter for consideration. Dr. LUSHINGTON congratulated the House and the country on the subject being undertaken by the Right Hon. Gentleman. The evils of the present sys tem were most ably pointed out by Mr. Humphreys publication, and called loudly for removal. Mr. FERGUSON wished to throw no obstacle in the way of the Bill, but the subject required the most anxious consideration. He was tavourableto the inquiry, by COmmittee or otherwise, and thought the framer of the Bill ought to be on such inquiry; he was desired to add, if the labours of Mr. Humphreys were of any use, they were at the service of the Hotne Secretary, in pro motion of inch valuable investigation. The ATICORNET , GENERAL would not oppose a d livings &marauding whiclrhad 'then between him and the (10. Ships, with their Freight anJ Tonnage. entered outwards and in- )o e, as the vernor, and he hetbeen resomaid on a perision, iirsoe. "la is rfiliaj, P',7,'filerland ia"hc rag layi.e(whas isi sii- , directed. sidation of his ion . services Jireither was thefts-nor . 111 14 ,. K aTa,"""" a p * :* k m •• • ot f rom swain owners and nom. tuated by truth in the asserted Interference of the Jesuits, though s o n e ( h i m l a s oma , prat i ng A pt paftale , t , she Liad .4 Is . It if such Colphel Bird had certainly:4AM Mr. Parker whether most. matte the, he had brought a tathollt Minister frdat Ireland, as Oa.* motion of Sr Joim Nsuintat. k was Aided that there qu:etly to all the Colonists whom he had introdiced were Irish be bid bebwe lb. 11.41.6 a "PT of deeire lP eee et the blywei.ll"l" sada Committee. rofess the Roman Catholics; and it was one of the regolatioas of HINIOOO WIDOW& iurch was the Colony, that when there was a certain number of On Mads night Mr. Flaw IBn v•aistke at tuotlea a e . .7Bit ZION VI ... ... 1....._ a _,...__, V • SO 'k • r Commission ; but thought the subject it was r.posed to investigate Might be separately inquired hunt in the same manner as had been adopted in reference to the Criminal Laws, and with greater advantage thee if the whole question were submitted to a Commi ss i on; it 'being the too general tendency of such associations to degenerate into theory, and to suggest alterations i n principle which it was most dangerous to meddle with. Mr. Secretary. PEEL did not' pledge himself to Commission. All he at present could promise was t h at the subject daituld soon have his consideration, and i h d the individuals he should select should be the mo:tega cient possible. After a few observations from Mr. SIIIIDWILL, thi Bill was read a second time, and ordered to b e coma misted on Fa iday nest. C3llll TRAYS ACTS. Sir A. GRANT brought up the Report of t' e Coma mittee of Monday night on the Corn Trade Acts. On the question that the first Resolution be lead second time, Mr. HUME obj .tied to the amount of protection I f. forded by the Resolution to the Agricultural inte re , t, which, he contended, was at variance will the free tri o, principles laid down, and partially acted upon, by Anis. tars. SJch an amount of protection ought not lob e given to 'the Landed Interest, until they could pose what they so frequently asserted, namely. that they p 4 14 a greyer proportion of the taxes than the other interest% of the community. The proposed laur favoured the agriculturist, and the other pOlllOll of the county would have to make good their deficiency. He objected ' so the Resolution, first, because it involved a breach of she promises given of free trade ; and secondly, because it mould go to favour the few instead of the many. The principle was decidedly bad. It would prevent oilier States from cultivating corn, and the consequence would be, that they would not be prepared to import when our crops might fail, and we might require assistance to relieve the consequent distress. With dome views, be should propose to make the duty 154. per quarter: this duty to decline is. every year one reduced to 10s. that to be a fixed duty. He was convinced such i'protection to the agriculturist would be found sufficient: he had no doub: the additional taxes imposed on the agriculturist did not amount to oat than would warrant as low a duty as 4s. He, however, suggested Ios. to air and them the opportunity of shew. ing, if they could, that their additional taxes rendered , higher duty necessary. If a duty of 15s. wet e now fired, our manufactures would revive; there would bean iss- emeireiste importation of corn, or an exchange of corn ftA leisosfactures, which would remove the present die. was. The Hon. Gentleman proceeded to argue that the taxation on land did not warrant the high pro:otitis afforded to the agriculturist. It had been argued that the landed interest paid twenty-four 25ths of the pose rates ; but this statement was founded en fallacy, being a fact that labour was paid for under the head t poor rates, to no inconsiderable extent. The Hon. Gen. tlernan concluded with moving as an amendment, thtt from and after the sth of J01y,11327, to the 6th of July 1128. a duty of 15s. should be imposed on every guar. ter of Foreign Wbeat• imported ; and that the du should be reduced Is. each year until 1897; after which, the duty should be a permanent duty of 10r.• all Foreign Corn imported, excepting that from Canada. Mr. MARSHALL seconded the motion, though had little hopes of success. He represented a porticos' and respectable body of manufacturers, übo had Inked to as alteration of the present Corn Laws, for relief *Pei the severest distress, but had now lost all hope. He also represented a respectable portion of the landed Woo* bet be felt that their interest was in portar conformity with that of the community at 1418 e, whit! .vras ..00w suffering beyond any former period, prin cepully from the almitst prohibition of the trade Corn. The distress of the country had long been atm buted to over trading ; but the manufacturers had long diminished their productions one third in quantity, and ' still the distress increased. He thought it must in great degree be attributed to those laws that prevented tie exchange of the products of our industry for the products of the industt y of other countries. Mr. IRVING opposed the motion. Our machinery was now so Improved, that the price of fcod entered very little into the cost of our manufactures. They were told that they ought to proceed on a new system, be cause it was laid down in books. particularly by Mr Ricardo; but, he believed, there was nothing in MI Ricardo's new system that was not known to the grand mother of every man in the House—(A laugh). The amount of it w. s, that if the tenaut could pay uo rest, the landlord could not get it—(A laugh). If you give to other nations a market for their surplus produce, you enable them to accumulate capital, and become you rivals in trade and prosperity. He was convinced that the agriculture of the country was sufficient to supply all its wants ;.and he would wish, as much as possible, to confine the supply of our wants to our owe pro- duction. Sir HENRY PARNELL said, the conseqsawe growing all our own corn would be to force us @attack oration of poor soils, on which corn could only be pef duced at a high price. By the present Corn Laws, ne 11 . than 25 millions a year was paid by the consamas corn, more than they would pay if there was a free wall in corn. It was true, not More than one:third of the sum went into the pockets of the landlordo. and the to mainder was lost in growing dear corn. America, sad the countries of Europe that bad corn to export, ire willing to receive our manufactures at low duties, if We would receive their corn ; and by our refusal, all oor manufacturing interest suffered the deepest injury. He thought, however, that his Hon. Friend (Mr. Howe; proposed that his plan should come into operation too soon, and therefore he could not support it, though every other respect he deemed it much preferable that proposed by Government. Mr. WHITMORE opposed the amendment on the ground that a fixed duty would be sure to be abandoned at a period of scarcity. It frequently happened that France and England were allicted with dearth at the same time, and were consequently competitors io the markets of Poland and America. At such a period the lied duty must of necessity be repealed. Mr. CRI PPS argued in favour of the highest duty, on the ground, that there was much land in this cone. try not yet cultivated ; that we had population enoegi , to cultivate it ; and were even about to send a pontos of our people abroad to cultivate land elsewhere. He spoke disinterestedly, for be had not the good forteoe to belong to the landed interest. Mr. WARBURTON objected to a graduated stale. duties, varying inversely to the fluctuations of prior.— ! The effect of this plan would be to produce a trade ifits and starts, and to render the business of the co. ted rAt the ON the the , ; it Y I to .1- 41 in )0 :th. "iv 5* M h hat • It hat . 7 3 1 till 'Ma •1I stor 4so ma w 'll d a of. 14, Ida nit. ore Itsio 1.414 esti the ;km at y fee :ted 1 ti of tea totetot. 411, • 11 rent nice >ort [lire .0 lids we 154. - I ma 'at had raid S des the Ise sloe net, gait test. our ed a ted, 1 . 14 1 iro- frog it ft r Not dis. situ t the AA Lt,on that the poor . 1 :y, n des ad of 1 Gen. jai , that seine July the year. uesa duty Eat after I N. on dra nada. ter gh he -fith stout 4 :°' wked I relief I h4 hope. fled • .40 1 Treat ow ?hick prin. le is i. long , and in a !rued I r the 11011 4.1 cir :ered were Mr. 4 Mr. sod- a p Tbe - r rest, .31 give Yoe 4 II 4 Pout 1.4 that ppIT pro. )`of t t Pa PIP tilt es of N. trade t hi s • M* I sot weio if ye oor He me) too so in th e CO au tv the • II oned that the I' the al the 3 I !sty, 1 ous I rano He tau I ile of eby 1 t co.o