Star. — London, England, 1808-07-19 00:00:00

• .L4W WIZ L. • ME! : COURT OF ICING'S BENCH, JL bYAI , . • ..:^ rat tuna V. DAVISON: : • Mr. DALLAS observed. that. he now held In Isii, hand an amended affidavit on- behalf of a Motion ' which he made the other day,-for the purpose of postponing until the Sittings after the nett Term, kids trial. It was stated - that General De Lanceyleft - -London on the 27th ult. two days before the notice of trial was given, which was cn the 29th ; that .immediately afterwards, that was on the 2d of July, a subpoena was sent down to Edinburgh, where the General was, to bring him up to London ; but the General eipiressed • some disapprobation at being called upon in.this abript manner to take such along', journey; fatigued as be was, and in such a feeble state, so-much so, that .Doctor Gregory, his Phy-; aliciati, was of opinion it would be dangerous, and, ought be fatal, to undertake it with the expedition lettuisite for him to anive in time for the trial of, j this cause, and of this there was the certi fi cate of thi ' Learned Physician. .: - -. Lord Eitasmomition.a-J , This certificate is not, keceivable. Nothing is properly admissible in It Court. ifirJtutaie but what is given under•the sanction of an .path ; if We take these certificates of Physicians about the health of their patients, we shall establish a pre cedent that they are entitled to be received in a Court . aef Justice, which they are not ; and therefore I do not advert to this certificate. • The a ffi davits in support of this application -were then read ; they were three in number--that of the Defendant himself, Alexander Davison, 'Esq. ; of Mr. Richard Wilson, his solicitor; and of JohnSfitin back, Esq. Mr. DALLAS observed, that heatras most clearly of opinion, in which all those Learned Gentlemen, whose assistance he had at consultation, retrained, that without the evidence of General De Lancey, it was in vain for the defendant to think of facing 'the case which was made against him ; although with such testimony, he had a perfectly good defencetbitt without it, Mr. Dallas declared he should retire feom the case altogether. The ATTORNET-GEWERAL did not hesitate to say that under all its circumstances, a great deal of sus. picion hung about this business. , Lord Etaxwaotioton observed, that the allowing an affidavit, on which a motion was made to post pone a trial, to be amended once, was a favour, and the indulgence must have its limits, else the incon venience of allowing parties to shape their affidavits to the necessities of their case would be very great. His Lordship could not help shying there was a great deal of suspicion attached to this application, under all the circumstances of this case, particularly about the departure of General De Laticey on the 27th of June. Strictly speaking, this application ought to have been Made in term; which did not • end until the 6th of July. His Lordship lainented that the . . circumstantes, as •they appeared on the face of the affidavits, called upon him 'to Mike, in the discharge of his public duty, observations which might have an unfavourable .effect on the paitv • making the application. As the Defendant swore positively. ahat the evidence of this witness was mate rial to his case, ho should be sorry to see him de prived of the benefit of his testimony; and yet-he was greatly alarmed at the idea of creating a prece dent for postponing a trial upon such an affidavit ; between these difficulties he should adopt the course which was lenient to the Defendant, and order the trial to bepostponed. - JULY 16.--CRISf. 6111/0-.-WALKETIy ESQ. V. EEADER, ESQ, • This was an action imputing to the Defendant a criminal intercourse with the Plaintars Wife. The damages were laid at 20,0001. . Mr. ciVtow said he was never called upon to ex ercise his professional duties under circumstances of ter pate and anxiety. The Defendant -was a an belonging to the same profession as h'an ifelf, and with whomlle . had had a long intimacy and friendship.: That fait, he trusted; would, not subject Ern to any unjust criticism, or do aw l k the received opinion, that advixates, however painful the ditty cast upon them, alwayreonducted themselves with honour anti honesty towards their clients. :He 'had said so much lest. it should by possibility be imagined he would do less against the Defendankthan he should against an indifferent person placed in the same situ ation. The Plaintiff was a gentleman of fortune, and had passed much of his time in the West Indies, where, in the year 1798, he had become enamour id, o f his present wife, who was certainly a female of most accomplished manners, and great beauty.— Shortly after • his marriage he came to England, and resided for a time in Hatton-Garden. The De. fendant at that time had been chosen Colonel Com manduot of a volunteer corps, and the fact. of the Plaintiff's having a company in the. same corps, brouglit the parties on a footing of extreme intimacy r Shortly after this the Plaintiff changed his resideneet, arid took a,spacious house in Russell-square, where the Defenda•nt appeared to have commenced a system of intercourse so extraordinary, that-the Jury would have to determine whether there was not something more than friendship in the viaits ire. paid. • The Jury would find Mr. Reader at the. rlaitatkrs house late and early, besieging, as -it were, -the' person of Mrs. Walker, and pursuing , her .like her sh a dow ; waiting on the steps of the door,, catching as it were every casual whisper, and .actingin, a .way, as if he felt it impossible to live apart fro* her. What v extr way she rode out, Mr. Reader *as sure to be the road, and the coachman, as a• matter of coUrse s drew up the moment he saw him, and tool him in. On one occasion the blinds were drawn down, and indeed a variety of circumstances took place, which it was impossible to reconcile in any other way than by imputing a criminal intercOursebetween the parties Mr. Reader would be found following Mrs. W. to Cheltenhamevisiting her in the absence of her hus. band, sitting with her in a room with the door fas tened and the window curtains drawn, and, in short, conducting himself in a way that none of the common purposes of life called for. On one occasion, in town, eie servant went to the.parlour, in which Mr. Reader and Mrs. Walker were sitting, to get the newspaper, when she found the door'fastened. On knocking, and telling her errand, Mrs. - W.- opened the dais stiffi cientry to put her arm through, and gave it. Again, • Cheltenham, the servant observed Mr. R. coming of the rittilig.room, and observed Mrs.W.'sdress, b was black, masked with powder on the slued-. der, the sofa discomposed, and pile - of the cushions upon the ground. hfrs. W:dict riot wear powder, but Mr..R. did. Such were the materialshe had to lay, hafore•the - Jurywand they.would. , ide As lb the 'so t o nests they naturally nacited.., was trae,,the.Wit nesses in support Of those facte. ' discardect. - Seri rants, all cif whonnhad lea' Nr K s r . 1 in • wq. .144 - 0 . iis , ; pleasntc--..they 'would thereficre watchtl*.Astitnour with. great t.,ixtn!riapeetion, awl if they thOuld believe they were cn . , agalnii elk mice. and happiness , of the Plaintiff , ana h is wife. ssd seeking to ruin and disgrace the Defendant, GOD t Orb' idiliey should cue ceed----nn the.other hand, it they should believe them to be Ihewitnesses of truth, they world judge of their' testimony as mankind in geaeral would judge, and if they tlkught the crirainal intercoirse established the r' woubFsay so. The next questioN would then be the, amount of damages, and he. would not disgrace hit ni self by saying, it the criminality was apparent, thati it was not an aggravated • case. The Plaintiff was! possessed of an amiable and beautiful wife, and the way the Defendant got introduced to the family would make his dereliction the more inexcusable. Men as sociated in military life had generally a nice sense of I honour, and if the Defendant had abused the confi-I denceof tbe Plaiatiff and seduced his wife, he ought to pay damages adequate to the injury he had inflic ted. :The Learned Counsel concluded by saying, that if the 'Jury were satisfied of the Defendant's; guilt they would say so by their verdict; but, on the coattaryi should the evidence not establish the 'case, he, for one, should be glad that his friend in the hour of trial had no 4. been found wanting in those moral end religious dutien.which he had hitherto considered hid; as possessing. , . . The Arioatasn dittnian said, he would not give the J..earned Counsel the trouble of proving the mar- 1 riage, &c. but at once admit that part of the case. , Me. Alexander Key was then called, and spoke to the' absence of the Plaiatiff in Scotland during they summers of 1805 and 6. Mrs. W. was pressed to,. accompany her husband, but the declined it. The Plaintiff, he said, was an affectionate husband. Wit-i ness called one day to see the Plaintiff, whim he un derstood to be indisposed, and was surprised on being told that Mr. and Mrs. Walker were both from home. l His sister accompanied him, and thinking the servant ! had been told - to deny his master, she said, ~ lam I sure your master last borne, therefore I'll step into I the parlour while, my brother goes up stairs." On ' saying this she opened the parlour-door, and found Mrs. Walker and Mr. Reader together. Mrs. C. Lancaster, who had been for five weeks in the Plaintiff's house, spoke to the frequent visits of the Defendant when the Plaintiff was absent- That he , attended Mrs. W. and herself to the play three times ; ' that Mr. Lancaster was always of the party,aed Mr. Reader's son once. That. after the play the party supped togethen.—That Mrs. Reader was obliged to go to Brighton on account of the sudden severe indisposition of her daughter ; and that the engage. ments foithe play were made before Mrs, Reader was apprised of such indisposition ; and that Mrs. Reader was to have been one of the party. That Mr, Reader and son on another evening supped at Mrs:Walker's, and Mr. Reader read to there a novel called " Herm sprong, or Man as he is not." The whole effect of this lady's testimony went to shew much attention on the part of Mr. R. and hit fa mily, to Mrs. W. and that they were often together, andahat the witness never observed any impropriety in Mrs. W.'s conduct, or any thing to. create suspkion. Wm. Sanford, a discarded footman, spoke to the frequent visits of the defendant, and to his having found the parlour door fastened, when the defendant and his, mistress were together s but he admitted, upon a question from Lord 7ELLENBOROI.7OII, that he had . ever mentioned this circumstance either tolls master or to any of his fellow-servants. Esther Tayinr, a discarded maid-servant, gave evi-, dence that her mistress was a woman of violent tem per ; waeconstantly quarreling with her servants ' • and that no one could live with her. That she was always ;at home, by her express command, whenever Mr./ Reader called, upon whose visits her temper became immediately compoied and cheerful. She had found the drawing-room door fastened when the defendant and her mistress were together. She had known him walk from eight till twelve at night, backwards and forwards before the door, looking up at her mistress's dressing-zoom window on the two pair, but admitted, to a question from Lord ELLENL'OROUGH, that the defendant could not have seen Mrs. W. unless she had put her head out of the window. She also more that the defendant was in the constant habit, for . fifteen months together, of spending two or three hours' in the morning with ;Ars. W. between the hours ofi eleven and four, althc ugh the whole Court knew that' the greater part of that time was- spent by the defen dant in the daily:discharge of his professional duties in the Court of King's Bench. One day at Chelten- , ham, as witness was passing the sitting-room, she saw Mr. Reader come out, and Mrs. W. observing her, called her in, when the sopha was discomposed, and one of the cushions on the ground.. Mts. W. desired , her to ~ tidey" the sopha, and to get a brush and rub the powder off the shoulder of her gown, which witness Sid. That witness should not have observed either the powder on her gown, or the condition of the sopha, 'had not her mistress called her attention thereto ! ! ! Upon her cross-examination, thecircumstance of the bolted door evidently amounted to nothing, as the door of the room in which Mr. R. and Mrs. W. were sitting, had no lock upon it, and the door could not be kept shut without bolting it on the inside. Francis Whitsay, a discarded coachman,swore that he was so much in the habit of meeting the Deceit• dant while driving his ;mistress, whether she went to the east or to the west, that he, as a matter of course, drew up to let the . Defendant in, whenever he saw him, n ithout even the check-string being pulled ---. But upon being strictly questioned by the Judge as to the period when this took place, he fixed it to be about the middle of March 1.807, when it was uni.' versally known, and admitted .on all hands, that the Defendant was on the Midland Circuit. All the servants spoke, with great acrimony, of their mistress's ill treatment of them, and uniformly agreed in their dislike of her. I - A i person of the name of Teasdale spoke of the Defendant's following and watching Mrs. W. upon cone occasion, but upon cross-examination, proved that the door of the room where Mrs. W. and Mr. R. were sworn by the servant to have been, was so ex nittenly difficult to open that he had complained to - tbs. Plaintiff himself of that ;irciunstaace, and that he . Mi. Ltisi the diatWM. . tic irneyiG efierai s h u tting .of the parlour do& appears to me, even ifyon the witnqss who swore it, to have been coinPletely 'cued 1-- * tmi '.:tion of the lock ; and to to _ _ by diet,. perfet f e r va improbablena n y t flung t ipteh a ia : it pries. na l had o and that there was no necessity for going into the de fence, The e pwhJidacuaer:ey:taclliatitihdNeveeicisl:arniviteholdlest' themselves perfectlysatistsed -fence and immediately pronounced a verdict. for the defendant. The Court was extremely crowded, and the event of this extraordinary cause was received with .univer sal satisfaction. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JULY ta. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. FORREST V. 1.10 N% The plaintiff in this case sought ttf recover dama ges from the defendant for breach of promise of Mar ria, under very aggravated circumstances. The facts, as detailed by the Plaintiff's brother, a master baker in King-street, St. James's, are these : The Defendant is also a baker, at present residing in Chancery-lane ; the Plaintiff and he, who are about the same age, had been acquainted for many years, ' their parents being next door neighbours, in the town of Peterhead, in Scotland. The witness, who had been settled in London for a good many years, hav ing, in the year 1800, gone to Scotland to see his friends, was applied to by. the father of dui Defen dant to take him under his care, which 'he die., and instructed him in his business of a baker. After some time, it.was proposed, that so soon as the Defendant should be settled in business he should marry the Plaintiffi Her father was applied to for his consent, which he at first declined giving, but at length grant ed, on understanding that a mutual attachment sub sisted between the parties. He at the same time agreed to give as a marriage portion with his daugh ter 2501. and to settle an additional sum of COOL .on her at bis death. In the mean tune the Defendant entered into treaty for the business of a baker, who wished to retire, and to 'enable hifn to do so, the wit ness advanced him about 4001. Havint concluded the bar the Defendant poetised going clown to Scotian & foe the purpOse of bringing up the Plain tiff, but ;it was thought More advisable that she should come to town under tb cmv of .a confideiatial friend of his. The Plaintiff had arrived in icrs4n and the Defendant was settled in his house about Christ mas 1805, and the marriage was :Axed for _an early day in January.' So eager was the Defendant to have it concluded that he went, iccoispaniect br i ll* witness, to . constilt the parish Out. ivhother the banns might not, as .in Scotland; be rec l a i m ed times on the same day. Finding that this . could not be done, he resolved to apply to Doetors Commons, for a licence, so that no delay might take place. On Sunday, the sth of Januar.y,:the marriage being fixed for the following Thurtday o the Defendant in vited the Plaintiff'to siini at his house, for the purpose of introducing her, as his affianced bride, to some of his friends. He here detained her to so late. an hour, that her brother, not being of the party„ she was in duced to remain all night. When the witness, next - morning, remonstratedon the impropriety of such a proceeding, the Defendant made light of the matter, and insisted, as the. marriage was to take place on Thursday, thamthere could be no harsh in her remain ing in his house till then. He feigned an excuse, howe. ver, for postponing the marriage from that day, and repeatedly afterwards, from day to day, although the Pliuntiff's father, alarmed at the situation in which his daughter had been placed, came up from Scotland, and remonstrated with him on the dishonourable part he was acting. He still professed his determination ' to keep his promise, alledging, however, as reasons for the delay, first, the.expectation of the arrival of his father, whomhe wished to be present, and-U=lly his inability to procure the consent of his father Lathe Match. He eves went the length of alledging that faith had not been kept with him, the Plaintiff's fa ther not baying given him the 2501. on his commen cing business. The_ father, to obviate this obiection, ; offered him an order for the money, which was meant as a marriage portion, and as such to be paid only when the marriage should take place, payable tea .days after the. solemnization of the marriage—and the brother endeavoprecl to point out the absurdity of the pretext, by. reminding him of the 4.001. he had advanced, '2501. of, which he was willing the Defea.. . dant should retain ashia sister's portion. It was at .length discovered that the Defendant had no inten ,-tiOn of ful fi lling his eagagentent—the Plaintiff was [taken home to the house of her brother, and the onsequence of her improper confidence in tlap honour :of the Defendant was, that in.sheOctobfriplihe saxue year she was delivered of a child. . • - . After_ this statement, which was given with the almost clearness and precision, Mr. flerjeaat SHEPHERD, and Mr. Serjeant 13esr, :Counsel for the Defendant, proposed to Mr. Serjeant LENS and Mr. Serjeant ONsitossybr tho' Plaintiff, to settle matters without farther trouble to the Court. Mr. Serjeant Lags, after some coesultation, in formed his Lordship, that theyhad agreed on - thepart of the Plaintiff to accept of .501. damages, and 151. a year for the child, during its life, the custody of it re snaining with the mother. • Sir JAMES MANSFIEp Expressed. his surprise at any' .such agreement having been made. lie; however, ad tothing. to do with it. His Lordshi? afterwards remarked, that the present appeared to him to be a case that called for damages. The Defendant Vi extremely fortunate in having got the other party to enter into such an agreement, and had the Jury Liven 10001. damages, he should not have been of opinion they were excessive. He wished, however, to know what security was to be given for the 151. per annum. Mr. Serjeant OzisLaw said, it was proposed tomake it a rule of Court.—The business was accordingly set , ' tied in that manner. . . • t' x 1 T ~~~~i~ ~iPllil~L d 6t/ItN EIKCIOI I NOE, hotAltit-laiNE, liar fresh ariiivila &Wheat Ws ai rr • Alld db. flue doll l er geoirtors-LVery halo Cale)" holsltvlir 4rhis li are dearer- grey and Beans the. two `there are tolerable stisildieg of•Oilts) cepoin l CT As uNDr ' JAW, 54.7d1PAM. 3: 13M11 (i4O( Fine ditto, 625. Sic. Tick di (o Rye, 4&. qua tits, 401. 42 ..•.- Barley, 44e• 40s. Arecf•lloso l .. Malt, 66.4. 76e. • ,"]. • . Aqiite Peas (golferi), RSpe Sciv4 -Grip ditto, .; . • . ir, ) 0•1 I , lollr RE L'kbf vkiek. of div s tlNoitt board' ;Whews.- 1 • • dit . fxSie:!* -14cilerft!•-• Pins - ` lis.4Bll *Supertrk .11.3 s to 841 Orei 'Mine White • ••• t0619* dais' niopedr 11). • 41 8 . D*ll94‘. . Barley Vas tF tSs Vine - hi to 4lk Mali „rstwilf...944‘.. e. White Pease Fpit,e9 1 2 0 . POlands Rape fled SSE to 981. per fliE doltre4lonr FROM THE LONDON ClAfkiri'tk, Average Price of Corn in Englasi., An 4 ending the 9th of July, istsl:: • *heat. Rye. Bactii s. d,I a. d. s. d• .lbs Si 4 55 10 " 4S 10' I "112 10 . The average Price o Sugar, tenni - S=4f( in the week ending the 18th by of 'RETURN or WHEAT in Mail-bile, in( !• 4th of idly to the Stk. of Julys: -Tistai Auntie 80 $ .. 100..4. 644.10* ! ...t th. A Rrruitki OF FLOeftt • - *on the 2sl of7tdgtp.thell& at lull 'Total 16,13 1 / racks-'-Aerate 671. Silk • " • es. 3d." higher than labs return: PRICE OF HOPS. • • 7' ' "oar. r. t . Kent 81. ss. to 41. 10ett DSc to ti Susie: Si. 1 0s. to 41. Cs. Susse4 21 lett. it VV. VII Rases 81. Os. to 41. kw. Farrier , )IA. Gbh. to ** PltitE OF Hors of THE EOM:MCI:IL MikitkEt. • BigiOCent 5t.144. to 44. lOs Pockets elk tbo. to 4. to. Some al ios. to 41. 46. ibis P4l43ol4s‘ Gs. ib tquct OF itAlr AND' STRAW TN Sint fika : Meabor Hay it 'O. DI 61. i 54: th - 51% kte New ditto 51. .ta. to ft 156. gist* It es. ib A . 10, SMITHFIELD MAlitkii',l.lli.t. is. • •TO s:nk the Oital pee. stone of 4111 - • Oti. to ss. 2d. Veil 41. tscl. th bit 4 &Luton -. 45. 4d. to ss. 04. Pork 45.. 'tad. to Mk it • Lamb ' Ss ed - to is NP. lOATE AAP LEADENHALL MAIOCET. _ _ Per Pone of qb.bi tire cantaith • . Beef Ss. 4d. to 4s„ 4d Veal Ilit. 5.14. to ks. id Muttoh 4s, Od. to Is.- Ott' Po!k ' 4S. 04. to 41k * Lamb 4* Od, to 6s 4d: . . SEA-COAL METERS' OFFICE, 1.021I1X)IA itYLV Mk' eaßt6ts, tint, and slit t !Amide' s I Victim*. hillph —1.14 Y I 1-1 -JIA9 it., :A* l*. , i4II 7 1 : 1 _s 2 *52 0 17 I_o t 511; 'I litl 1 i * l l 6 4.1 01 1145 b 1 . _ si 411 K 4 1 'at* csi a.O 44 O. 410; 61. p! :4441 , ** e P~i~r gua, Co! No. 7 sw • 1r r.oti JCIL Info Goa gt. we i :11 out° jhad mots once. seconirirailed pler t ksmlth to him i tilan .., ,•,„, _ ._ _ ~,.. .. at to repair' it, and nat.so prolrea uuat all the respectable] Inhale friends,l4)firs. W. co li ed to vait,* . 1 4 1 ; to the'hout En *KO hit,.*as ipiruig . lii, teimpao4. ----ItltereirPols zoiXt.ti:AincttistAif int.42931,*10 g oal asked the g4i4Off'S Counsel if this e kiits a lin .„*..- cun4tiattoreien iravflitoipneNt [acted; . 44; drPl - - )#rY,.5"..`! TOl.t have be-l.ta the tase,,, - tl ' "' and Mr. AttkneY-General, *ill, 444*Si, y.c4t in taihatf of the ref ant yoillaiie doubtatiL te- . . ~ . m airthlg on, your ri l t , _it, you have the astpause 'or surmise, you ha,ve aiity to declare it, and the AtiorneyiGeneral &A pro ceed s but the shutting . ____ .......: :r........ 1.A.1;‘....... • s. t . E, lUI.Y • an abnadant eto 014 603i4 aad 4 41. k • -' L' l 4ol Pi% 1.4 tick " tililestdaitA !: - • exit. fie* • (old) mix aft 423. 445. Mr 411. 463 ti% 47.. - sta. t: eiti . "ass. 6r•3. for 4 Sit3p ai unCtei. Ban it i fft te-• ,S6synAt it las Ws WO clial (0 , 02; nate t• • 00s kr*. O. ( • 10i 4Bt fao v Os to gatirr-41447 th, Mil' • • itc , ohs. !a?ms.thetetatia Baia 141 e Liei 1 tt s. 11. :.1 From the *dull* jai s 30s. 6•l4.pszciris. scrudirt oattfilisEitt til I I.lll3llgettiit. • Rai; than tass 441 tit • •7 44 _ [P. A* ..11 amb Ships 9 k t 2 -•• tlitPl S.J COAL MARKP_T, JCLY Ships 9.,;(1 40 NE/V 4 4IU POAk" Bryan . . ...,. Charlotte Heaton Makki Hebburn itI••• Percy Main • ' * Tanheld Moor -A I Team Park Maln Townley Maio • .16.• • • • - I Walker Walla-End 4. , • 1 Walls-End - 1 1 VI/dingo* •;,* •••• 4.401'; East Tandeld . - Bell and Co.'s Widla-P.64, : • Blyth qowponlditn 0. .2 Hartle S . • 4 UNDEALAtiv. . . Bourn Moor Eden Main Primrose Malt. • Rossas . Maih • - •• Walbottle Ships at Mark et .46 Neweasde Ctsais 6 Sunderland • 2 Cinders 1 Yorkshire os. ca. fb 416 Od. to 451 - ft, • otrs. ed. (4. od. ..,:. TOMORROW: - : Sun rises, ' I a7Sun setss sli2 . Mo tile*. S minutes aftet 4 mitrutesafter / 14 naututts *fret f, ---- HIGH WATER AT LoNpol4 TO-M4I(RONV, Morning • - -• • nitrigtes 'Art' 11 Afternftth mtkones *het' it -... . . illf IitIS A MAJESTriI ROYAL unarms r•NrEst: ' , FAKE'S 60mb:ie .. PILLS, so justly raniotis fie . ihett superior efeoacy in caring every degree Ind le/Midi:VP of the Venereal Disease, the Scurvx, & c. withtibt toitinentelit bf •resti:aint of diet, in an easy, explwlticmt, safe, and octet hint tier. Otte small tasteless Pill it a dose, its operation ktip 'atter tittle, and requiring no particular attention. In 15 days they : generally cure those cruet Nibblers ' its where they fail in that time of perfectly restoring health; the 17 .1- tient has rite happy assurance that he or alte It at the eve of 604 so testore,d, let the degree cif titalignality be ever so greets It is an exCellency peculiar to these Pills, td Make direetYl@ the complaining part, and enter into contest it il site oliendid matter, %Thiel% tkey speedily dislodgcan4 exPek . , hey ire tkrtio red by experence tifbe a preserver of health, ti tieli as it !SUP err', lit tab ing only right single l'Als Sprti - it Arid WI id eVief)illigi, in short, thdTaCeitteoltitsthis.elttraordiniul uoilistidd In thilfi that whateyer he'll purtiv.bopreit ftoaßigtenti the Weft ritt;ti castli'artil cheeeet,' as Plough iniit,sslerst Of intriuMiAl attital fink. ',Rae l'Wo arm .11aoit t ritorthT:A,Ripce 14..44 calskett __ • Masters Mil Caiiaths of Skip 4., 'mark,ia l .ter !Mit** Ik. • keep. good ip all ellin t atel 'any. ,:. afthnoy and that they kid? lei 1 "nov borne Ifietfotitesi-ft9. it` With inaleatilag credit im_ , 0, en r ,4ll; • 'cit 0 . 44 .? I•ukpmuck that dating al taast ep.r 'last eight'yelari . / beta *gured vwdiA of .40,000.0 1 `sons, many iff_zOom hag beep ) . c, r .cil 14 - om-1 - id' 34italai oho! "sa liv it i°o ii 4 /12 ) 4f.fre11iet444°444,- ,41 citista mats* ' made use of gdflipttt e ff ect. ,',.: .. . .., . 1 .4 •_. .• Prepared ind,.Spldbf the Itignowlip . at; THOSSAL 'el:1:S 1 • Memlwr otthc 404 c pll.ege , wens tali l andau, it hiS No. 9, New lithlgvariett i w.ltetalte ivill iatee adv.its, stisbott%. Fee, to reticent taking t,ltierc„ and vilil,./inower Petit:Alt ler tors, if past:P*4-0a lb* iainuiertna,. observiag.in aft eaSeS to most inviolable secrecy, Mr. petlent r a point or car. !Poliog br e! ' mentioned, bvt at their,niin partitairoeitte.st, by. the,Preprietgit during die course of inca`i than sir yoassethat he bathed the of' • &feting of an eriapsire salt of the,akiee medicine, and the rig' ' tick arising tberefranu . • ' ... • • --. .. ..... . ..... .... . , . They are also sold, by his appoinitmenit o atthe EN-fun:cent kb . 95, St. Albat&street, Palkmallotie, A;Orsholt, - .No: toS, Co! fordestTeets Mr. Dieborough's, NO. 7, ,Tisteotreist-Bill, IWO • Opposite the Monument; andby.one Person at everytonsidefa t eiw.n in Fogland, ilte, in Boles of only vs. 9e. tab, seaki Oh with full and plain directions, iihitobtpersoes of either lei Atill cure themselvas with ease andavoirecy.., N.B . Every Boni ioldia Creak &haat. is Graded up with atfaddit : on which by favourof the Commissioners , is primed at thrs l / Ofece " T. Taylnr 4 No. 44, New triage-street," tolnktiste. )4 4 is felony, and all other. are counterfeit,.. . -• .. ‘_'••" '4 ..sa .. LONDON : Pibrtect and Pubtished 6711AVEL 1111121tti 6111 to bury )'_lace, Lambeth, at thellteitst,oftne 116. 1, 60.1 street. Published also at the lITAit-tilwrict, if3,l A .z =d