Star. — London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

a quarrel with Baron Onapfedi; wID On kite the origin of that quarrel? The LORD CHANCBLIAnt said, the vitiation ought not to be put. Did any fact come to your knowledge of a circumstance that occurred at the residence of the Princess, which occasioned your quarrel with Ompteda ?—By the confession of a servant. I aw the servant on his knees, begging pardon for bh crime. What was the name of that servant? The LORD CHANCELLOR said the last answer that bad been given by the witness, which shewed that he did not know the circumstance of his own knowledge, what the servant had stated, was not evidence. The Marquis of DOWNSIIIRE.—Before whom was that servant kneeling, and what was his name?—He was kneeling be fore the Princess of Wales. His name was Maurice Crede. Lord LAUDERDALE said, that as the witness only knew the fact through the servant, he much doubted whether the question and answer ought to be allowed to remain on the minutes. Earl GREY was in favour of the question. All that the witness had stated was, that their: was a servant making confes sion of his crime on his knees ; and that the name of that scr eam was Maurice Crede. There was nothing of the nature of t hat confession stated by the witness. The Earl of LAUDERDALE contended that, if the qua. tion was coupled with the answer, it would be clear to every Noble Lord that the circumstances stated in the question came to the knowledge of the witness by the confession of a servant. Lord HOLLAND said, he hoped their Lordships would ab stain from the practice of referring to questions and answers which had been already passed, for the purpose of having them erased, and make the objections when the subject appeared to be such as should not be entertained. The practice would add to the already intolerable length of the proceedings. After some further conversation, which it was extremely dif ficult to collect, the discussion ended without having produced any effect upon the question. There were loud cries of" Go on." The Marquis of DOWNSH IRE—With whom did Maurice Credo live—whose servant was he?—The servant of her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales. Was it in consequence of anything that was said by her Royal Highness that you called Ompteda out? Lord L A UDERDA LE objected to the question. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that the cause of his calling out Baron Ompteda had nothing to do with the ques tion before the House. The Marquis of DOWNSHIRE.-1 consider that I hale a right to put this question. The LORD CH INCELLOR.—I should be guilty of a neglect of my duty, if I did not declare that the question cannot be put. Lord LIVERPOOL said, he hoped their Lerdships would alhere to the rule of placing restrictions upon themselves. They would get into a sea of difficukies, if they insisted upon the liberty of putting every question they chose to witnesses. Lord GREY said, their Lordships had agreed to abide by the practice of the Courts below, as far as was practicable. He believed that, in conformity with that rule, it would be neces sary to withdraw the question, as he believed it could not, under such circumstances, be put by the House. The Marquis of Dowsortea withdrew the question. The Marquis of DO W SSE' llt E.—Where dues Maurice Crede now live ?-1 do sun know but from hearsay. 'fu the best of your belief?— The Arrottrar-Goittrat. objected to the question. -.- Do you know whether he lives in this country 7-1 have heard ler is in England. Do you know with whom?—No; I have not heard. Did hlajocchi ever mention the name of Ompteda to you?— I perfectly recollect, at Rome, mentioning to Majocchi her Royal Highness's commands, that none of her Royal Highness's servants should offer any insult to, or molest Ompteda. I never had any conversation with the lower servants upon the subject, and consequently be did not take the liberty of speaking to me. Did Majocchi ever mention Ompteda's name to you?—l do not recollect. When you saw the man on his knees to her Royal Ingham, what did her Royal Highness reply ?—She forgave him. Do you recollect the words she used ?—.! do not recollect. Lord GIUNTHAM.—You said you had seen Boland and her Royal Highness walking arm in arm together; have you seen them do so at the villa D'Este 7—l do not recollect having seen them walk at that particular time. Do you positively recollect not having seen them walk arm in arm, when Bergami was a Courier do not recollect ' their having walked so when Bergami was a Courier. Lord HOOD.—Did Ompteda dine at the Princess's table at Milan?—l think he did. Did he at Como ?—Yes. Did he at the Villa Villani?—Yes. Did Majocchi wait at the Princess's table at those places ? He did. The Duke of ATHOL—Yon said you thought it necessary, when her Royal Highness was sleeping on deck, that she should have a male domestic near her : did you express that sentiment to the Princess herself?—l never did. In giving the reasons for thinking it was not degrading to her Royal Highness to have Bergami sleeping under the tent, you said there was nothing mysterious in it : did you, when you [mind the hatchways closed while she was in the tent, think there was any mystery in that?—The tent being closed, I under stood her Royal Highness to have retired to rest. I did not con sider any mystery whatever in that. Was Bergand in the teat then ?—I do not know. Do you know that he was not in the tent d=l do not. I think you have already spoken as to Bergami's sleeping in the tent—(Criss of " No, no!")—As to your believing that he slept in the tent. Have you any reas for supposing that he was not in the tent when it was cled 7-1 never thought about it. You said you never represented to her Royal Highness the necessity of her having a male attendant to deep on deck ; did you consider it necessary far the male domestic to sleep within the tent?—l Dever represented the one or the other. Did you think it necessary that a male domestic should sleep within the tent ?-1 never thought of the thing at all. Probably, if nobody bad been under the tent, I should have taken no no tice ; I thought it necessary within myself. Was it for her Royal Highness's safety you thought it neces: nary ?.-Her Royal Highness thought so, I did not think otherwise. What danger was there to be apprehended on board the po hcca7—l don't know of any inur.ediate danger that was to be apprehended. Ten, when you say that you think it was right that* male attendant on the Princess of Wales should sleep under the tent, it is not in consequence of any danger having been apprehended ? Mr. Beoorinen begged to observe, that the witness had not said, that there was no danger to be apprehended. He said that there was no immediate danger to be apprehended. The Duke of ATHOL directed the short-hand:writer to read the witness's last answer. Mr. Gurney read it, and it being found to correspond with Mr. Bacreenest's statement, his Grace dropped the question he had just put. Was there, in point of fact, any danger 7-1 don't know of any immediate danger; nut personal danger. If I had thought that. I should not have been easy myself to have slept below. Was there any danger sufficient to induce you to recommend that a r..ale attendant should sleep under the tent ?-1 never did recommend that one should. By Lord It ADNOR.—You have said that at Carlsrube her Royal highness dined with the Grand Duke, except on one eccarion when she dined with the ?durgravine • did you dine with her Royal Highness on these occasions ?—I ' did. You have said that her Royal Highness also supped with the Duke and Nlargravint. Did you sup too along with her I—l did. At what hour did they dine?-1 cannot precisely recollect; it was Lte iii th. evening, I think. nave you any recollection of the lateness of the hours of the eveaMg patties at that Court ? —l think they broke up about twelve o clock. Do you know whether her Royal Highness bad time to re tan home between the dinner and supper?-1 should imagine I'll,: bad. ll.d. she, to your knowledge, on any one of these occasion% r'lLr" lm ho between the dinner and aupper I —ldo not recollect. . you undertake to say she did not ?—I will undertake to us it I don't recollect. If I had the smallest tecollection of it, I could have no motive for keeping it back. By Lord 1 ).1 It LI N TO N.- -Did you ever see Bergami tae leave of her Royal I lighness in a way different from other persons have seen hint take leave more than Once, and never Saw any differeuce from the way in which every person did. During the king muunivation which you have undergone, you have onto used the words, that her Royal Highness slept under the tent. Do you mean that she slept, in the ordinary accep tattoo of that word, with her clothes off ?—I do not b.slieve that hei 'loyal Highness ever took her clothes off while on booth the ~i i grai Mint to shift — to change her dress during die day. is my arm belief. I mean in the voyage back frees his. On the first voyage die dept In her sable. You have not positively aid that Berpmi also dope seder ' the tent?—l never saw him there. But you have stated your belief th at he did deep there. As I to understand that he, in like manners slept on dd other bed with his clothes on ?—1 do not believe Sagami ever took his clothes elf. I never saw any bed-clothes ow that bed. Do you know where her Royal Highness changed her clothes at her return from Jaffia—Below, in her own cabin. Did you, from a window at the Villa &Este i ever see a donee performed by Mahomet ?—Yes, I was in th e room with her Royal Highness. We heard a noise in the court; her Royal Highness went to the window, as I did also. We saw a number of persons in the court, and Makomet dancing before them. Do you know if hiajocchi was one of these persons ?—I did not take notice. Did you conceive that there was any great impropriety or in decency in that dance ?—Certaisdy not ; I never did. How long is it since you saw Captain Briggs ?—I saw hint about two months ago, at Portsmouth. Had you any conversation with him of the subject of the pre sent prosecution ?—Cattain Briggs declined entering into any conversation on the subject. And you never have had any conversation with him since you were on board the Leviathan never have, I have only seen him once since at Portsmouth, as I have just mentioned. If you had the conversation with Captain Briggs, do you not think you would have recollected it?—l think I should. Lord ELLEN BOROUGH.—You said, when you saw Cap tain Brim at Portsmouth, he did not wish to have any conver sation with you on the subject; did you wish it?—Yes, I went to Portsmouth on purpose. What was your reason for so doing ?—I had heard that Cap tain Briggs was to be called as a witness against the Queen. I felt convinced that this could not be the case, and I wanted to know from himself. What did you ask Captain Briggs?—l asked him, if he was going to be a witness against the Queen. And what was his answer?—He said he understood so, and he was afraid that he was, but that he should say nothing but what was honourable and just. Was that the whole of his answer?—.So far as I can recollect. But that was not declining to converse with you ea the sub ject ?—He said he could not talk about it. Extract of a Letter from Genoa, dated the SOth of September : " A letter from Palermo, dated the 15th inst. just received by a Sardinian vessel,- states—' I am sure it will give you sincere pleasure to know that an arrangement with Naples is actually in progress; and I trust that a few days more will establish the peace throughout the bland:" Yesterday the Duke of YORK visited the KING, at his Palace in Pall-Mall. The KING'S Pavilion at Cowes, in the Isle of Wight, is to undergo several alterations before his MAJESTY again visits it. A large sleeping-room, and hot and cold baths, are to be erected, and a new landing-place is to be made opposite to the north east entrance to the gardens. Last week, it was discovered that the outbuildings contiguous to the KING'S Cottage, in Windsor Park, had been entered, and nearly a sackfull of poultry taken away. Through a pair of braces being found on the spot, the thief was discovered to be a man who had charge of the elephant. He sent one hamper of the stolen poultry, by the Egham coach, to Belton street, Long-acre ; and the second hamper was de tained at the Coach Office, where the fellow had the impudence to deliver it himself. He was dismissed the service. A pine-apple of the: black Antigua kind, which weighed lye pounds fourteen ounces, was cut, a few days ago, in the pinery of Lord PALsizarrox, at his Lordship's seat of Broadlands, near Romsey. FASHIONABLE ARRIVAL& The Marchioness of Camden, and the Ladies Pratt, from their seat, the Wilderness, Kent; the Counteu of Besborough, from her seat at Reekampton ; Sir William Abdy, Bart. from a tour • Mr. and Mrs. Haywood and Miss Grey, at the Royal Hotel, St. Janses'oureet, from Paris ; Viscount Maynard, from his sac in Eases; General Fuller, Mrs. Fuller, and family, at Thompson's Hotel, Catendisbequare, from Paris; Thomas Hudson, Req. and Mrs. Madam, at ditto. DEPARTURES. Lady Meaner Lowther, and Lady Jane Sherrard, to the Hon. Colonel Monkton, at his sat in Northamptonshire ; Hon.Charies Noel adl family, from Kirkham's Hotel, Lower Brook-etreet, to Bath; Hon. Francis Noel, from ditto, to Bath; the Duke d Norfolk, to his seat Fornham, Suffolk; Right Hon. Sir Charim and Mrs. Long, to their mat Bromley Hill; Lady Carolina Lamb, to Bracket Hail. In making the excavation for laying the founds. tion of the new portico to be erected in the front of Drury-Lane Theatre, the workmen employed have come to a part of he walls of the collaring of the once celebrated Rose Tavern, by which was the en trance to the boxes in the time of Ganntct. The Worcester and London Fly Coach was unfor tunately overturned on Thursday last, on its journey down, about four miles on this side of Worcester, by which a Lady and a poor woman had each an arm broken, a Gentleman his hip dislocated, and other passengers much injured. The coachman escaped with sotne severe bruises. The Blue Last public-house, in the Curtain-road, was robbed, on Monday night, of £250, during the ime a Singing Club was in it. The Dublin Journal says—" We have just received from a Correspondent travelling in Italy, the fol lowing, dated in August, at Milan :—On the morn ing I arrived here, there came in, by the Lodi road, a carriage without the driver, and containing the bodies of three persons who had been murdered while travelling in it. This horrid deed was com mitted within a league of the city of Como. On our arrival here we found fifteen Italians, who had been to Milan (sent for from London) , to bear testimony in favour of the QUEEN ; but, it is said, the Austrian Authorities would not grant them passports. On our way to the Simplon, three fel lows, two with pistols and one with a knife, stopped a party in our presence at half-past eleven o'clock in the forenoon, and robbed them of their cash, de clining, however, to take their watches or baggage. In the Austrian territory in Italy, them is little or no law. In the Sardinian territory it is different ; you may travel with the gold in your hand.— On our road to Mont Blanc, we found that two young Englishmen had bought a girl some days before at Geneva, for 100 napoleons, as a female - servant, from her father, for three mon ths, placing the money in the hands of a notary, to be paid on her fulfilment of the engagement. The young woman's brother find ing it out, gave notice to the Police, and caused them to be apprehended ; and the conclusion is, the father and girl are at present imprisoned at Thonon, while the English Gentlemen are at large. We met them at Savoy, on the road to Chamouny. " CHILD STEALING.—This cruel system of robbery is become very prevalent, for the sake of the clothing. A boy, between four and five years of age, son of Humphrey George, of Pultetsey-street, was decoyed from the door of his father on Tuesday evening, by an elderly woman, who pretended to be his aunt, and he was found crying in 'ardour-street, at ten o'clock, wrapped in a filthy piece cf blanket. • FRENCH PAPERS. Free& Papers of Monday onsbied this days The Baptism of the Royel Infant is postptintla ttf December, in order that the two Chambers may assist at the ceremony. . General Kamm, who was imilicated in the late plot, and who had escaped the vigilance of the po lice, has just quitted Dresden on his way tor St Petersburgh. • The latest news from" Lisbon come down to the 21st of last mouth. All was joy and tranquillity in that capital, and throughout the whole country. The new Regency had sent an invitation to the Junta of Government at Oporto, to join with them in the great work of regenerating the State, and preserving the i ,public peace (which, however, seems in no way me naced). At the same time they sent to foreign Courts to announce that a Constitutional Government had been installed, under the direction of the present dy nasty of Braganza. A patriotic individual and his wife have given large sums in money and jewels to wards the necessities of the State; an ezuknple which will no doubt be followed by many others. The reviews at Pest began on the 19th ult. with grand evolutions of cavalry, followed by manoeuvres of artillery. The EMPEROR, the Archdukes, the Duke of CASHIRIDOI4 and Prince CHARLES of BA VARIA, as well as other strangers of distinction, went present each day. The Maxi:ear contains a Proclamation issued by . Sir T. MAITLAND, High Commissioner of the lonian Islands, in which it is announced, that the Grand Capitan Bey had officially apprised the lonian Go verament that the coasts of the Ottoman Empire, from Messolongi to Avlona inclusive, are in a state of blockade. The High Commissioner, therefore, strictly prohibits all intercourse between the lonian Islands and the ports of Prevesa and Parga, pre scribes a limited intercourse for the purpose of com merce with the ports of Messolongi to the opposite point of Santa Maura inclusive, and the ports of Gumenizza and Avlona. The ports of Sagiades, Bucintro, and the ether ports situated in the vicinity of these, are opened for the embarkation of provi sions and catt'e, under certain restrictions. This Pro clamation is dated the 21141 of August. Five per Cents. 74fr. 45c. PORTUGUESE AFFAIRS. ICLANIATIOX OF A? WEBOI 11101112411ADOIL COIIIIICA (1 I), Anastasio TO ass 14 Nepo o Rey, e a Patriot, a se convent, Neprao (como Pedro) o Dios slue tent."—Csnoss. M Portuguese !—What is that delirium which impeb you on to your_ruin, to the entire dissolution of name and power ? Do you seek to follow those perjured troops—those rebels to the State, and with them overturn that Seam which at this moment is the only safeguard of the national Independence, and the pre server of the Portuguese name ? Rebellious men--meat cor rupted by venal sentiments, guided by bass passions, and asi mated by doctrines subversi►e of ail the principles of civil so ciety, lead you on to the most fatal coasequenees. They blindly run after an Misery hope, a hope that cannot be realized unless with chains and slavery, added to that yoke which for sixty years deprived you of the glory acquired by the heroes of your country, endeared to you by the blood they shed, and enno bled by the fame of their actions. The history of Portugal is blotted out, her glory has faded through the shame of this act. Oh ! heroic Portuguese name, never again will you be preferred by the distinctive title of Portuguese nation. Yon will be a Province and not a Power; for you ancient alliances are at an end. The national interests have disappeared--national hono ur and heroism have evaporated into smoke. The deeds of the va liant Argonauts and ancient Lusitanians, who undaunted planted the national lag in the four quarters of the globe, will henceforward be deemed fabulous, and their acts pronounced as the delusions of fancy. If posterity ponders on the annals of Portuguese history, will not this question be asked—Where now exists that wonderful power? Will not the answer be as fol lows P—ln oblivion, covered with the dark mantle of perjury and slavery. Do those who Inconsiderately lead you on to so impends an error, calculate the dilliculdes which accompany the attainment of this chimerical independence? Do they know the obstacles, the dangers which attend their steps? Are not their sinister intentions self-apparent? What will be the reward of their venal ambition, founded on the chimerical ideas and vi sionary prospects of future prosperity andindependence? What political interests does the nation gain by such rash conduct? What now becomes of your social security? What of your poli tical unity ? This now depends on an arbitrary force, divested of all power and will; for can these be supposed to exist in the perjured promises of perfidious chieft who for.the moment com mand you ?—Conuider, for an instant, the consequences of simi lar principles, and in the future you will behold a p icture of horror and of blood, accompanying the misery prepared for you by the infatuated ambition of your neighbours. What means, what resources what social measures have the initiators of your crime prepare d for you, in order to preserve you from the chains which hereafter wid be offered to yoga by that enemy, who at all times has been opposed to your national independence? Portuguese! If that name is still due to you ; if you still de serve that title so nearly connected with Portuguese felicity; if you still teak: sentiments of adhesion to national honour and evtt;y if thew sentiments still incline towards obedience and to the Sovereign who governs you ; that Sovereign whose sismetoes broke for you those chains of slavery under which you groaned in 1640 ; that Sovereign who voluntarily took the fire =62step to :valise the general emancipation of Europe; that , who, in spite of the dangers and contrarieties he ex went to secure for you the greatest portion of the Jl Monarchy ; that Sovereign, in short, who daily wadies over your security with paternal care ; who sheds tears ever the unhappy; who protects the weak from the grasp of the Zezii who cted eurtcjeeietves; whothe supplication aside s theof thpeemoprpaltrdne,pwidowe, of the Throne to contribute to your consolation. Is it of such a Sovereign that these rebels seek to anticipate the paternal and royal intentions ? No. Portuguese, you ought not to allow so horrid an attempt against his royal authority. This your own preservation demands. "In the King the political unity of the nation exists. In him are the alliances with other Powers to succour and protect you from the designs formed against you, from the mares laid for you by that nation which is your natural enemy. If the Portu guese flag is at this moment covered with mourning at the eight of your madness, it will again its attelent character the instant Portuguese virtue shal l the former sentiments of fidelity to our Sovereign. A sheet time have Ito live, altar a long period of thirty-three years of mama service to my iiirsb= reign and country, with strict fidelity estadhesion, but the te mainder of my days shall be passed in the saes seakerable gib. ciples due to our King, and the true Motels at the Long live John VI. King of the United Kit trisim of Portugal, Brazil, and Algarve! (Signed) " JOSE ANSELMO CORREA nENRIQUEZ. " Haaburgb, in!' September, uno." LAW INTELLIGENCE. COUltt OF XING'S BILLICH t OCF0111:1 11. MAMMA?? AND OTHERS V. milli. This was an action of assumpsit for money paid to the defendant for the use of the iilaintiffs. The cue was this:—The defendant is a respect: Able stock-broker, and kept cash at the house of the plaintiffs, who were bankers in Mansion-house-street: The defendant, in the course of business, had drawn a check upon the plaintiffs for 1:643 15s. and had written across the face of it the words 4 , and Ca." but finding he bad no occasion for it, he put it into his pocket. By some carelessness he lost it out of his pocket. The moment he discovered the loss, he went to the banking-house, and gave notice to the pay clerk to stop the check if it Should be presented, and not pay the money, describing it as a crossed check, without mentioning the particular manner in which it was crossed. In the ordinary course of business, a crossed check (meaning a check to be paid to the particular person named in the cross writing), is paid in the clearing house in Lombard-street, and not at the banker's counter. The pay clerk said he would take care of 4 0 and shortly afterwards he went to dinner, forgettineto mention to the clerk by whom he was succeeded, that the defendant had been to the house to forbid the payment of the check in question. In the interval the check was presented, and paid by the clerk at The counter, who took no . notice of the words “ and Co." concluding that all was right. Shortly afterwards the pay clerk first mentioned, returned to the house, and discovered that a check of the defendant had been paid, and imme diately exclaimed, that the check of which he sup rhe had had notice not to pay, had been presented. e t hen went to the defendant's office, situated about three minutes walk from thebanking-house, to ascer tain whether the check in question was that of which the defendant had given notice, and found that it was. In an interview between the defendant's bro ther and the principals of the house, they offered, under the circumstances of the case, to co npromise the affair, and proposed that they and the defendant should equally share the loss between them. This was refused on the part of the defendant, and the present action was brought. The question was, whe ther the plaintiff's clerk was in fault under the cir cumstances proved ? Mr. Justice BEST charged the Jury , in favour of the plaintiffs ; but the Jury, after retiring about ten minutes, found their verdict for the defendant. OODDEN V. LATDOII AND °THEE& This was an action upon the case. The plaintiff, a seafaring man, living at Folkston, in the year 1817 employed the defendants, who are Bankers at Dover, to purchase for him a certain amount of Stock in the French Funds. The defendants, to transact the busi siness, employed Messrs. Pavers, Bankers, of Paris; Messrs. Faven employed, as their broker, a Gentle man of the name of Pelon ; and Felon failed, and absconded with the money entrusted to Mm. The mode in which money is invested in the French Funds appeared, from the evidence, to be this :—The party wishing to buy, applies to a broker, who is a public officer, and to whom he pays, in the first instance, five per cent. upon the sum proposed to be bought in. The stock being agreed for, a bulletin is given to the broker, specifying the name of the purchaser, the amount of the stock purchased, and the date f the bargain; and, within a few days (from four days to a fornight), a certificate of inscription is issued, which constitutes the security of the purchaser for the sum he has invested. The plaintiff in the present case, Mr. Godden,desired to invest £llOO English sterling of his money lying in the English four per cents. To yell out those four per cents. Messrs. Lathom and Co. commissioned Messrs. Hoare and Co. Bankers, their correspondents in London ; and Messrs. Hoare were to accept, to the amount of the stock so sold, bills drawn upon them by Messrs. Favers, of Paris. On the 6th of May. 1817, Messrs. Lathom were in formed by Messrs. Favers that the stock was agreed for; and, in a subsequent letter, they received the bul letin, which fixed the sth of May as the date of the bargain. On the 12th of May, bills for £llOO were. drawn upon Messrs. Hoares; and, although no cer tificate of inscription was in the meantime - received by Messrs. Lathom and Co. upon the 16th of May those bills were duly accepted. Pelon having ab sconded with the money obtained from Messrs. Fe vers, the question was, whether Messrs. Lathom and Co. as the agents of Mr. Godden, were or were not bound to make good the loss? Mr. Justice BAYLEY was of opinion, that where a man employed an agent, even without contracting that such agent should, at all events, be responsible, he had a right to expect, at the hands of that agent, all reasonable care and precaution. The Jury, without retiring, found a verdict for the plaintiff.,--Damages to be settled out of Court. CAVENT•GARDEV.—GOLDSMITHI much admired Comedy of She Stoops to Conquer, was performed last night at this Theatre. It was supported by an unusual assemblage of talent, and it kept up, through out, that genial sense of mirth and pleasure which ever attends the Comedy of Nature. Mrs. DAVISON' appeared in Miss Hardcastk, for the first time this season, and with great success. Mr. C. Hznissfs excellence is Young Marlow is universally known. Tony Dolphin is, perhaps, Mr. liwrron's best cha racter in legitimate Comedy; Mr. Etwcurr and Mrs. DAVENPORT acted the ancient couple to the life; atd Mr. Aasor and Miss Focire sustained their respec tive pans in the most pleasing and judicious manner, giving them the precise degree of prominence which was designed them in the piece. The House was well attended, and, From the reception of the Fay, we should judge that the performance will be more than once repeated. HATIAAREZTo--The Tragedy of Hamlet was per formed at this Theatre yesterday evening, when the part of Haisdet was sustained by a Gentleman, who had made a successful debut in that character last season, on the boards of Drury-Lane, but whom in disposition then prevented from following up the fa vourable impression sande by his first appearance. During his absence from the Stage, he has evidendy not neglected the cultivation of his powers. He re ceived, throughout, frequent and loud applause, which was long protracted at the close of the per formance. The Polonius of M-. TERRY was as whim sically ludicrous as it could ,veil by rendered. The Ophelia of Mrs. GARRICK was very unaffected and interesting. The Houk: was well attended. li ~.t