Star. — London, England, 1829-06-12 00:00:00

LW INTELLIGENCE:. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, GVILDNIA&L. Jima IL • • • (Before Lord Tiavasam sod Comm Jades.) SHADWILL N. HUTCHINSON. ;Mr. Toa•ron (with whom was Mr. Coleridge) said that this was an action against the defendant, for hav ing made an erection which obstructed a window of a' • tenement situated at 68, Wood-street, Cheapside, by which the reversion of the property was injured. The plaintiff was Sir Lammlot Shadwell, the present Vice- Chancellor, but he was only the nominal plaintiff, as surviving trustee of property, of which the beneficial interest was in Mr. White, one of the Magistrates at the Queen-square Police-office. He should prove that the erection obstructed the passage of light and air, and be should prove, moreover. that the window in question was an ancient light. Upon this evidence the plaintiff would be entitled to a verdict. Evidence was called proving the obstruction of the window; that the window had calmed for 52 years, and that 52 years ago it had the appearance of being an old window. Plans and models of the premises were also produced. . - Mr. JOHN WILLIAMS (with whom was Mr. Cawood) said, that he rested his defence on the custom of Lon. don. By the custom of London, a man had a right to build upon, or to vary any erection upon. an ancient foundation. He should prove that the erection com plained of stood upon an ancient foundation. Lord TINTIIRDEN said, that to bring the case within the custom of London, it must be shown that all four walls were in the possession of the defendant. But all the four walls wete not •in this case in the possession of the defendant; and therefore, although it might be , proved that the foundation was an ancient foundation, that would not be sufficient. A man must not come over a void space to his neighbour's house; the four walls must be in his own possession. Mr. WILLIAMS admitted that the four walls were not in the possession of the defendant. A verdict was accordingly given for the plaintiff— Damages, '1 s. The greater part of the day was occupied in dispos ing of undefended causes. COURT OF COMMON, PLEA& Nan 11. The Court was occupied duriog the whole of the day with two Special Jury causes, which were only interest. ing to the parties concerned. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, JUNI 11. THE SPITALTIZLDS WEAVERS. - _ Joshua Shipman, who bad been convicted by the Magistrates of Worship street to three months impri sonment, for having entered into a conspiracy to force their employer (Mr. Moore) to alter his mode of con ducting business, appealed against that conviction. Messrs. Atm and BROM= appeared in support of the conviction ; 'and Messrs. Anoultus and BODED. °against it. Mr. Moore, silk manufacturer, in Milk street, Cheap side, said that Shipman was in hisXmploy in May, and had work belonging to him in his hands at the present time. On Friday, the 22d of May, Shipman, with four others, called upon him in Milk street, and produced a copy of the et-solutions passed at Temple Mills, Essex. He employed about two hundred work men in Spitslfields and Bethnal green. Shipman and the others urged him to comply with the first resolution, which declared that a general strike of the workmen would follow.unleu the masters agreed to pay within ten per cent. of the prices of 1824; he gave a decided negative to their demand, and be also re lu•ed to accede to the other resolutions, expressive of their determination not to protect any cane spreadev who might work at the masters prices, and that they would unseal the looms in small divisions on the fol lowing morning at eight o'clock; next day the Depu tation again waited on him, and stated that his work was then unsealed ; at this time 130 looms, belonging to him, were in the possession of the weavers ; his looms had since been destroyed ; they said my looms would be unsealed within an him if I acquiesced with their terms) I inquired if all my workmen bad struck, when they replied, that they could not separate themselves from the great body or the weavers. Mr. ADOLPH US, in addressing the Jury for the defen (Not, said that the men would rather submit to beggary than give up what they sought for. He contended that there was no intimidation used to compel Mr. Moore to alter his mode of carrying on trade, and that the weaver bad a right to make the best bargain for the work he intended to do. The CHAIRMAN said, he was of opinion that the man bad been guilty of the offence imputed to him, and therefore confirmed the sentence of imprisonment which bad been passed upon him. He might apply to the Secretary of State for a remission of the punishment, and that would afford bim.an opportunity of ascer taining the sentiments of Government respecting his proceedings. The appeals of five other men who had been sen tenced to similar punishment for the same offence, were also dismissed. Tuesday last a beggar man was seen in the village of Molescroft, near Beverley ; and on Thursday the wife of Joseph Smith bad occasion to leave bee house to go to . Beverley, when the man got in at the chamber window. with a ladder, and plundered the house' of every thing portable. lie was pursued and taken on his way to Hull, when silver spoons, broken into small pieces, and other articles, were found upon him. He has been Committed to take his trial for the offence. • Wednesday the remaining portion of the extensive free hold estates in Long-lane,Cloth-fair,Bartholonicw-close„ and places adjacent, the property of the* Right Hos. Lord KINSUICITON, were disposed of at the Auction Mart, by order of the Noble proprietor. The other por tion of this property was sold at the Mast about three months since. The tenants of this estate enjoy several important privileges, being alloWed to carry on trade though not freemen of the City of Landoll. The celebrated Pis Padre Court is also attached to this estate, the right of holding which belongs to Lord ken sington. The property submitted for sale yesterday cont sisted of twelve houses, with shops; in Longlane,'We.t Smithfield, including the Old Red Cow. public house ; the Black Horse Yard Livery stables, coach houses, and premises adjoining; eight bosses in Cloth Fair; four houses in New-street ; six hoises, including the Baker and Basket public house. in Middle-street . ; two hi East Passage, the NOtestant, Dirsentere. Charity Owl ; a carpenter's shop and premises; and seven' houses in Middlesex-court and Little Bartholomew Close. The whole is now let to variogs penims at IoW, pound rents oa leases, grafted by s.prd Kenli s ston; for various terms, the whole of whicb ezpii . e in about 50 years, aqd same at a much less petiod..at 0351. 10a.. per annum; the purchasers becoming entitled to the vidaable reversionary interests on the various leases falling in. The property was . Pot, pp in,Sl, lot, ansl realized the sum of 17.5554 • Tht tenautaof.the homes were the principal purchasers. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS, ;IRIS 11. The Sessions commenced this morning before the Rinbt Hon. the LOaD MAYOR, Sheriffs, and uther City Olficen. The Presiding Judges are Mr. Baron kfULLOCIC and Mr. Justice LITTLIWALL Mary Natter was indicted for assaulting Emma Here bert, on the King's highway, and stealing from her per a shawl, value 10s. ber property. The prosetutriz (a young Welsh piti) stated, that on the 11th of May she had been looking out for a sites don, when on her return home she was taken very ill in Conspton-street, and obliged to sit down on a step of a door. Whilst she was sitting there, the prisoner came up and invited prosecetrix to go to her lodgings in Rupert street. To this she assented, and on her arrival at the house, the prisoner's husband attacked her, and threw her down stairs. The prisoner at the same time snatched the shawl off her shoulders. A pawnbroker named Tate produced a shawl, which was identified by the prosecutes, and had been pawned by the prisoner. The prisoner, in her defence, said the prosecutrix and herself, on the night in question, were very drunk, and they agreed tb pawn the shawl for the purpose of buy ing some tea; ber husband certainly knocked the pro sicotrix down, but that was on account of her being in liquor. She could assure his Lordship and the Jury she was an honest woman, and well known as such. Mr. Baron Hus.Locc summed up, and the Jury found the prisoner Guilty of stealing, but without violence. Aksander Fislay;;;, aged 23, was indicted for :tea- , ing in the dwelling.house of Sir William Beechey, to whom he was a servant, a silver tea pot, and various, other articles, value 1001. his property. Mr. C. runtimes (after desiring the witnesses to leave the Court) stated the facts of the case to the Jory, as afterwards detailed by the following witnesses Ann Memory examined—l am cook to Sir William Beechey ; the prisoner was a fellow servant ; on April 17 he asked me if 1 had washed the plate ? I told bias some of it, which I gave to bin); he asked me if that was all?. I shortly afterwards heard the prisoner go oat at the front door ; I went down to the pantry, which appeared in confusion, the drawers and cupboards being wide open, and the plated articles thrown about the door; the silver ones were gone. I perceived that the prisonet's box had also been broken; I went directly to the street-door, and found it open; I then called another servant, and we communicated the robbery to Lady Beechey, who sent for an officer. The witness under went a long cross-ezi nothing of any consequence was elicited. Mary Rune, another servant of the prosecutor's, cor roborated the evidence of the last witness. don. but Cross-examined by Mr. Cmtazsou—The prisoner bad lived with Lady Beechey four months; on the 17th of April he had a letter to deliver to a Gentleman in Oxford-street. When the officer came, I told him that I heard the street door creak about siz minutes after the prisoner went out. The prisoner was absent more than an hour; when be returned, be appeared rather confused, but not particularly so, until taken into cus tody. I think all the articles stolen were silver, except two butter ladles. Frederick William Beechey, Esq. examined—l am a Captain in the Navy. and son of the prosecutor. On the evening of the 17th of April, about half past nine o'clock, I was sent for to my father's house, in Harley street ; my brother in law, Mr. Jackson, was also there; we went into the pantry, which we found in a very dis ordered state. There was an inventory kept of the silver and plated articles. The silver ones were gone, and the plated left; it must have taken a great deal of trouble to have separated them, and a considerable length of time. In the prisoner's box I found a penknife and two or three books; when the officer spoke to the prisoner, he appeared very much confused; he was taken down to the pantry, and asked several questions; he said, looking towards his box, that his clothes and five sovereigns which he bad were gene. The prisoner a; this time was about ten feet from the box, which be had not examined, and therefore could not have known that his money was stolen. The prisoner then looked into a tray, and took up a plated fork, and with out further examination, said si The plate is all gone." When he said the money was gone, some one asked him how be could know that without examining his boz ? To this he made no reply. Mr. Jackson showed him a penknife, and asked him how be came on the landing place near the , door ? The prisoner said " You did sot find it there—you took it out of my box." The prisoner said he shut the street door after him, and tried if it was fast. It would have been impossi ble for any one to have got in at the windows. This witness underwent a long cross-examination by Mr. CLARICSON—It was true that Mr. Jackson found the penknife in the prisoner's box. The prisoner in reply to all questions strongly protested his innocence. All possible means bad been used to discover the plate, but without success. Benjamin Schofield, an officer of Mary-la-bonne police-office, deposed to taking the prisoner into custody. He appeared very much agitated, and asked what was the matter? Witness told him the plate had been stolen, and he sias suspected of having done it. In answer to further questions. prisoner said he had been out on a message for Lady Beechey. that he bad left the plate sire, and the cupboard door locked. Witaess examined the cupboard, but could not discover any marks, as if it bid IWO opened by force. Cross examined—The prisoner said he had no rela. lions, but witness has since found oat that be had very respectable relations, and understood he had always borne an excellent character. This. was the case for the prosecution. The prisoner, on being called on for his defence, put in a long written paper, in which he declared his inno cence. Several witnesses gave the prisOner an excellent character. Mr. Justice LITTLIDALE summed up. and the Jury, after consulting tor some time, returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Willioet .Yesteg was capitally indicted for breaking and entering the dwelling house of William Crouch, at the perish of - West Drayton, in the county of Middle sex, and stealing :thetefrbas a variety of property, and, SOs, in copper coin. The prisoner is the inn who was admitted as approver in the case of the'Teddingten Lock robbery, and upon his evidence, Wbeitlej, Kite, and Kiig were convicted, and suffered death. Mr. Baany stated the case for the prosecution, and called !jibed' Cotterell, who said she was servant to the piosecator. On the night of the 19th of December last her master'spremises were broken open, and the pro perty stolen named in ,the indictment. A twopenny piece was also stolen. The thieves entered through the brick wall at the end of, the shop window. William Barrett,. acOnstable ' produced a twopenny piece, which .he lotted at thertsonet's residence. The witness identified the piece as the same which she saw in the roitesiion delis prosecutor. 'Haitiet DalbY stated that she lived at Terkkenhalt in December last. On the lib of. December she wits present at Kites hooseisetrin some property was divided' . that came from Twickenham. The prisoner Young was also present, but he was not resent on the gOth of De cember, when the prosecutor s property was divided. Mr. Baron Hou.occ stopped the ca.e, observing that it would be too much to find the prisoner guilty upon such evidence. A verdict of Not Guilty was accordingly returned. Before the Itsoessen and a Lead= Jury. arrissivs amaseßY. Joseph Barnett, a Jew, aged 30. was indicted for breaking and entering the warehouse of Joseph Colo. batch. in the parish of Allhallows, Basking. on the 7th of March last, and stealing therein a quantity of plate of the value of SOUL The prisoner was remanded from last Sessions, on which occasion his trial was postponed at the request of his Counsel. Mv. Acirt stated the ease for the prosecution, and afterwards called the following witnesses: Mr. Joseph Colebatcb. the prosecutor, stated, that he bad warehouses in Lower Thames-street, where be had several boxes placed for safe custody. Some of them belonged to the Reverend Edward Osborne. Under stood the boxes contained plate, but did not see the con tents. It was the duty of the foreman to lock up the warehouses at night, and to bring the keys to witness. That was done on the night of the 6th of March; at nine o'clock on the morning of the 7th. witness found that the warehouse had been broken open and the boles rigid of their contents, with the exception of some. plated articles which were not taken. The warehouse is at the back part of the premises. The countinghouse desk and iron safe were also broken open. John Williams. a warehouseman is the employment of the prosecutor, proved that on the evening of the 6th of March, he locked up the warehouse safe, and gave the keys to the clerk. Next morning found that the premises had been broken open, apparently with some housebreaking implements. Charles Herdsfield. one of the city officers, stated, that on the morning of the 7th of March he was walking near Finsbury-square, and saw the prisoner, followed by a man named Hayden, who was carrying a basket, which he found contained a quantity of plate, and, sus pecting he had stolen it, took him into custody. The prisoner walked away. On the following Monday wit. tress met the prisoner again in Leonard -street. Shore ditch, and he ran away, and concealed himself in a baker's shop. Witness saw him go down into the bake house, and called out to him, "Joe, come up, if you will go quietly, I will not handcuff you." The prisoner consented. and the witness then took him into custody. Thomas White, another officer, confirmed the above statement, and upon his cross examination stated that he searched the prisoner, and found about 401. upon his person. John Haydon stated that he was a porter. On the morning of the 7th of March the prisoner employed him to carry a parcel. and while carrying it he was taken into custody. The poisoner ran away. Witness was examined at Guildhall, on suspicion of hawing stolen the plate in question. The Reverend Edward Osborne stated. that he left the plate in question in care of the prosecutor about two years ago. The plate was here produced and identified by the witness. This closed the case for the prosecution. • The prisoner denied the charge. and said it was the result of a conspiracy. If he had been guilty, he had sufficient time to effect his escape. John Latham. a baker in Leopard-street, stated that he knew the prisoner. On the morning of the 7th of March he came to his (witness's) shop, and asked leave to go down stairs; the officers entered soon alter. Pri soner was a jeweller, and. as far as witness knew. an honest man.—Several other witnesses were called to character. The Ricottas* summed up the evidence. and the Jury found the prisoner Guilty. The RECORDIR immediately called the prisoner up for judgment. His character, he said, was not unknown to the Court, and a more dangerous and hardened fellow newer stood at that bar. It would be perfectly useless to address any warning to such a person. and therefore he (the Recorder) would at once proceed to inform him that the sentence of the Court upon him was. that he be transported beyond the seas for the term of his natural life. NEW COURT. Edon Mr. argent Arnim Jan Kerma, a person of very respectable appear. ante, was indicted with William Goodear, for stealing a chaise harness, the property of Thomas Chapman. 77 There were other indictments against the prisoner of a similar nature. The evidence was extremely conclusive upon the counts laid in the indictment as it regarded Lerman, so that the Jury without hesitation found him Guilty, and acquitted Goodear. The prisoner Kerma* was again indicted, with a pri- ' soner of the name of Wain; for stealing a chaise and harness, the property of Maly Wall. It appeared in evidence that the prisoner Kerman had been in the habit of selling harness. although he did not keep a regular shop. When apprehended on the charge on which he now stood upon his trial, he ate and swal lowed a 51 note, which was alleged to have been con nected with the present indictment. inasmuch as it was the same as was paid by the person who purchased the harness. The Jury, without hesitation, again found Kerman Guilty, and acquitted the other prisoner. Mr. Sergeant Aessttr, in passing sentence upon Kerman, said, it was a fortunate thing for the public that justice had at length overtaken him. The sentence of the Court was, that for the first offence he be trans ported for the term of seven years, and that at the es. piratioa thereof, be further remain beyond the seas for the space of seven years upon the second indictment. AMU Porter was indicted for stealing ten volumes of books, value five pounds, the property of Henry Barnes, a respeciable bookseller living in Great Pulte- ney-street. • The prosecutor stated, that on the evening of the robbery he was morning home, when he met the pri soner carrying a bag; from his manner he thought there was something suspicious about the prisoner ; he there. fore questioned him until he met a watchman, when he gave him in custody. Upon ezaminiag the contents el. the lag at the watch house,. he found to his surprise that ten volumes of Journals of the House of Commons were his property. The prisoner's defence was that he was going to take the parcel to the Bell, in Holborn, to go by coach. He was employed by a sunset: The Common SZIII44IIT summed up the evidence, and the Jury returned a verdict of Not Guiky. Isaac Martio,,aged 42, a Jew confectioner, was in dicted for sealing, on the 10th of April last, a 501. bank note, the property of John Dishy. Hannah, the wife of the prosecutor, stated, that on the 26th of September listshe brought honse.some notes from ,the tank of England ; but as she can neither read nor write, she did not know their value. On the 101 Of April last, the prisoner,. anti another man mealy like ,him, called at .ber shays, .in Limehouee, and she par. chased a quantity of sweetmeats of them. She then sent to het husband for the key of the chest, from whence she took some notes and paid to the prisoner as she supposes, but she will not swear to which. Does not know a SOL note from a Si. The Comstou Saaotratir, observing a good- deal of mental reservation about the witness, gave her repeated cautions, but she persisted in her stupidity. John Dishy, the prosecutor, was called, bit nothing was elicited to convict the prisoner. The Jury returned a verdict of Pitt May. Prosecutor—My Lord, f hope you will allow us our expenses? The COMMON SAltaltANT-...N0 ; not a ghee farthing, POLICE 'INTELLIGENCE, GUILDHALL Yeeferday Jahn &hem, who was charged with essittptring; wii another. to 'bean goods upon credit keen Joseph Weiteig Fleet-lane, was brought up and discharged . the prosecutor kat* that by Widnes been alsk to bud the witness upon whom he regag to prove his caw. _ BO W—ST REST. About twelve o'clock yesterday morning Mr. Sheriff .Copland presented Memel, before Sir Ramage Ikasta, the Sitting M a e,. true, to apply for a warrant against a pant* calling himself Capp Gooch, Gan whom he had that merviag received a ktter et ,b ei g in t►e most insulting language, sod calculated to incite him teams mit a breach of the peace. Mr. Sheriff Copeland then hassled bum tel Sr RAMA SD Mauna. Sir - Raintano-1 nem read sack scurrility In my Hie. Pray. M r . ((bail? Copeland, may I inquire what bad led to this eery gr ew attack? M --- r. Sheriff Copeland said that the person who cam his Captain Gooch bad a good while since got into his debt a few hundred pounds, and such was his plausibility that be bad subset. quently been induced to make the Captain a further Mutter. Ik e Captain made repeated promises of payment. but petronsed mom of them; therefore he ( blr. Sheriff Copeland) had been under the necessity of retorting to legal measures for recovering his money, A writ was accordingly lamed and served on him, upon which be proposed such terms as induced his (Mr. Sheriff Copeland'.) who had authority to do so. to forego all further hesdlity. Not having kept his word In this mere than in the former Mance, a second writ was Issued against the Captain, 'Ube. however, kept out of the way, so that it had net been surfed upon him. As he (Mr. Sheriff Copeland) was Minding In the yard of the keys' &change on the previous afternoon he observed the Captain, and made up to him, to tak if k woe his intention to pat the meiney he owed. The Caplan sseised highly iadienut at the appucatis e became insolent, and, turning ea his heel, said. w Artet you a pretty fellow for a Sheriff to mina hoeing people for money after this fashion r Sayiag which the Captain made of and he (Ur. Sheriff Copeland) heard no mere of him till he received the Inter a few hours before. Owing to his eMee, and hay a Magistrate of the City of London, no other coarse was left era to hint betas appeal to the laws. Sir Rasnaso—l think. Sir, you act most properly and joildgmk. It would, indeed, be an odd Ming if men were m take the Sell simply for demaidiog their own. The Sherif was dam dimmed to seep into the dest's room, whoa his information was takes by the clerk. upon which a warranteres I subsequently timed, and was placed in the hands et Salem, a principal elficar, for execution. A respectable-look's& middle-aged man. who give the oar Rickard his, which is supposed, however, to be a &titian ear, was charged with bevies been concerned in a dully and cumin burglary in the house of Mr. Griith Foulke, et Little Rowelismst, Drury-hat. Jones las deposed. that be was one of the principal Akers et this .Sc,. Owing to iefennatien be had received, he, Oast n ien- Ur, west midi a march warrant to the helm, No. tii, Drury-. lane i where she Flamer Wee& The primmer was is bed. and near the best witness felled OM box produced, containing a quo tky et silks. Os Nardi." she prisoner's coat pocket, witness found a pedult book. cesiminkig several pawnbroker's deplicatuter silk. sod ware knees; from which it appeared that the primer was as uncertified hoolurepe. Being unable to seesaw ter the possession of the het and lie eenlems, witness and a brother slur took the risme, inhe ensendy. Witness szandmill Mr. Irseks'ir Kunkel ea the smeraimg of be robbery, and curtained that dat thieves had effectoildoirmory *nigh Me skylight of the bacigUp. Mr. Richard Fake singed, that he was see to the rummer, and assisted kin lo his bushms. His tuber's him' was m tered between two and three o'clock of the morning sit the lOW et May last. and pieces of silk and other articles; of valor of iik. were stolen the:dram. The eight pieces of oak new produced en a portion of** goods so stoles. They all have sped dam witness's . private mark. Sir Rammui—Do you know the itimeser at aill. Witnese—l do not,tik ; I nearer saw him before to my Elizabeth Heidatock depend that she was • widow, ardresold at No. tit, Hasty-lase. The prisoner and another mac lodged en the same Boor with her. Abort neon of the day afar the rob bery was committed, ebe recollected that the box produced wee left with bee for the 'winner, by • pine° in the dna of a penes. At that time she had net beard of the robbery, bet was teM of it in the course of the same evening. Sir Ramie asked the prisener Übe whited to say anything? The prisoner replied that be did net. At seven o'clock yesterday evening, the prisoner, Richard My was again pot to the bar, when several pawnbrokers produced pleas of silk which he had pawned with the. since the burglary, sad which Mr. Foulke identified as his father's property. Mr. Green, the prisoner's landlord. deposed, that the peisente came to lodge is his boner on the morning of the robbery, and re turned beets with the porter who brought the box, whisk was the same produced. The prisoner again declined speaking. He was coned fur trial, and the parties bound over to prosecute and give evidence. HATTON—GARDEN: Yesterday eserning two lids, named Intim 11leianne and Jae Lanier, the fernier thirteen peen of age, sod the alter but deem, were charged with main free the mock of a Ink girl, the dew* ter et a Lady residing lie ompettesbreiet, a coral necklace. Bateesse, though young in yews, is a verydderender, and it Is ket ten days since he win illisrated from the House of Correctioe. It appeared that the female @smut bad taken the Nair girl out to walk, and having stopped to speak to an anietintsereethe chill ran on some distance before her. During this dough' saw theme prisoners *peeking to the child, but took no notice of the dream stance. However, when she rejoined her little charge. the se, vend that the necklace was taken away. She lostantly maned Im 'deepen. They denied an knowledge of the named's.; bat whilst making the most violent protestatioas of theirkanocence.the necklace fell to the ground at Betensates feet, having glided from the lidded kis waistcoat throagis the inside of his newness. He and lib companion Isaac. was then taken its custody. Bateman was sentenced to three moths' imprisoonseut M the Home a Correction ; and bases was remanded until his 'revisal disinter could beascertained. _ _ . T. Amur was darted with stealing a silver watch and several other melting from G. Runk near flastie4wMgm. Russell, who is a sailor, seated, that, hmkgbeenmaking !nary with a friend on Monday evening lim, be had got a little "by the bead," had that whilst endeavouring to mis halasi.: l o. wain had become becalmed. and he had . droppptageip en the passage. la the Intel., Beanie tank the oppertmdty el plundering tgas. Hew. ever, towards whin the trade wind. er Maas true Ws be found that, a *sire W been aboard. He hoisted she druid distress, wpm a osostable bet, down, and jhey set test in chase Thee together. *With. having rim sospieloni of Renner, wan se a hoses ia IdaidseAsse, wharfs he found the . peissoir., sad apen handed him. Akhongh there was nothing Tory condor., arm loaner, yet. Irma his welloarned reputation, he was sonsisesd three niestbs' imprisonment in the Home et Correction. TOWN—HALL. ~. • Mary liaidg. lira Hawse sod ilarslhaensy g .wers ehrepd whim a piece et pristed i cetten from the Mop of Mk. Jab Nichobest, The singes= stand, that the primers Haseleity came We is shop and ached to look at some pelota, whirs wereahown so them but they made De purchase, cad were goitres the counter Mob perceived the prisoner Mary _sante one Attie Seem is hwara• sad seized hold el ler. Reddy was slandlag at the deer milt for diem They were ,wooed by illsormsd. a llemetrest pais who was passing. • The pruners were MI/ committed for aiaL MARRIED. At Marbles, es the 16th of February, Nolo Bard* SO Region, Ald.do•Camp to hb the Heft Rs Chola Colville, to Rib., youngest daughter of the late Marquis de 800. HIGH-WATER at Morning Afternoon DGE TIS110kROW• $ misses stuff 11 38 DV saw after 11 Lanes: Printed sod Published by JOUR Muir., the Pfq.14.4. at the k Oirlas•Nc Pickemplaces Tagil If. ! • . . MIN a ••••••••• • .:.• .c . . . A . • gaol Da tild • • ( . cam 'of! Pm a I 1 tra Oa Of give it . I On 4 this leas be iL Cit aipil oat t ticu .4 lliOf TONI ".4 Pel Gia wif lii Res Far Rai. Lou bars 114. Lee Li »o, NJ sal Can Car --:r RFI thisi dot Chu) a - sai' tug FOI Via ;:t fai, I A sal 1