Star. — London, England, 1826-11-10 00:00:00

The ljnia MAYOR commanded ante, while be proposed M the, health of Hr. Canning." He said be wished to pay his duty and respect to the Right Hon. Gentleman near him—George Canning —(applause)--de Seeretaryof State for Foreign Affairs-46e splen dour of whose eloquence, and the brilliancy of whose talents, com manded din admiration of the whole Empire. This tat* was received with long continued acclamation. When silence was obtained, _ _ _ _ _ Mr. CANNING: in returning thanks, adverted to the period when all Europe was engaged in a war of more than ordinary magnitude. That time had gone by, and the labours of those who held high official situations were, in consequence, considerably lessened. Those labours were now comparatively light and trivial; and as they were directed towards the cultivation of peace, and the diffusion of arts and commerce throughout the world, they carried with their success reflections of the most gratifying nature. They had this day heard, in their own language, uttered by an illustrious foreiiiner, what were the sentiments entertained towards Great Britain, by that country, with which, for twenty years, they had struggled (as we understood the Right Hon. Gent.) for the mastery of the world. Those sentiments, he was happy to say, were of the most conciliatory de scription ; and he was sure it would be most satisfactory to the assembly, when he declared, that the feelings which had been this day expressed on the part of France, would have been re-echoed, with delight, had the re presentatives of the other European Courts been present. (Cheers.) Successfully to cultivate the continuance of the peace and tranquillity which now happily prevailed, would afford a sufficient reward for all the labours, to which, as a public man, he must necessarily be ex posed.—(Cheers.) When the applause which Mr. C*xsnro's observation caused bad ceased, The LORD MAYOR proposed the health of the Right Hon. Robert Peel, to whose courteous conduct, and persevering exertions, in his situation of Secretary of State for the Home Department, he could bear, from experience, the most decisive testimony ; as, in his situa tion of Sheriff, he was frequently obliged to hold com munication with the Right Hon. Gentleman on subjects of considerable importance.—(Drank with three times three, and great applause.) Mr. PEEL returned thanks. The public approbation which his conduct had this day received was peculiarly valuable, because the situation N hich he had the honour to hold placed him in constant communication with the Municipal Body, who, therefore, had a full opportunity to judge of his proceedings. He must say that those communications had afforded him the most unmixed satisfaction. He could truly assert, that during the period of five years in which be held his present situa tion as Secretary of State for the Home Department, there had not, for one moment, been an interruption of the cordial understanding which subsisted between hint and the authorities of the City of London, and which was so essential to the good government of the City. The LORD MAYOR Detit proposed, with three times time s the health of the Right Host. W. Huskissoo. (Much applause.) Mr. Husxisses returned thanks: If the manner in which he had hitherto discharged his duties merited their approbation, that approbation constituted his re ward, and would stimulate him to further exertions.— The manufacturing interests of this country had, it was well known to all, encountered great difficulties and distresses. As to the cause of those difficulties and dis. tresses, and the best mode of removing them, various speculative opinions were afloat. He would not touch upon those opinions now ; but be was prepared to say, that he would be ever ready to receive advice on these momentous subjects from the citizens of London; and that be would use every effort in his power to advance the commerce and to uphold the manufacturing' inter. e.ts of Great Britain—(Applause.) The heaths of the Master of the Roth, of the new Lord Mayor, of the Judges, of the Attorney and Sollcitor-General, and of the City Members, were severally given ; and thanks having been re turned, the company returned to the Council Chamber, which had been fitted up as a ball-room, at a quarter before MI o'clock. GENERAL BILL OF FARE. 180 tureens real turtle, containing 5 pints each; 200 bottles of tunic punch, 67 chickens and pullets, 44 capons, 43 hams, orna mented ; 43 tongues ' ditto ; 341 raised French pies, 40 pigeon pies, 30 stewed rumps of beef, 17 debed breasts veal and savory jelly, 4 boiled turkeys, with oysters, 22 forced turkeys, 30 orange and other tonnes, 2 barons of beef, 13 pieces of sirloin, rumps, and ribs 'of beef, 3 rounds of beef, 30 dishes tarts, creamed; 90 dishes jelly, 15 blanchmanges, 44 dishes shell fish, 4 dishes prawns, 36 &bre Unshed and other potatoes, 36 sallads. 2 almond pastry, 2 caramel baskets, 60 large mince pies, 38 marrow-puddings. Hooves-28 turtles, roasted; 45 dis he s wild fowls, 133 dishes sante. Dissents-180 pounds weight of pine apples, 144 dishes best hot house grapes, 200 ice creams, 75 plates apples of different kinds, SO dishes of pears, 50 ornamented Savoy cakes, 25 plates walnuts, 50 plates dried fruits and preserves, 50 dishes root cakes, &c. 50 ditto preserved ginger. HUSTINGS TABLE, As wince um Rum HIM sus Loan blAyou eassresra64l tureens real turtle, 8 dishes of fish, 2 turkeys and oysters, 2 nwmps of beef, stewed; 4 dishes cold chicken, 2 hams, ornamented; 2 tongues, ditto; t breast of veal, dobed ; 1 turkey, forced ; 2 raised French pies; 2 cold capons, 2 orange tousles, 4 esawbrie jelly, 2 dishes mince pies, 2 blanchmanges, 2 dishes prawns, 1 ditto lobsters, 2 ditto caramel baskets, Sate almond cakes, erns. mated; 2 cold pigeon pies, 2 marrow puddings Remover-2 pea fowls, larded; 5 pheasants, 3 dished wild fowls 4 ditto partridges. Desseas--7 pine apples, a dishes hot house grapes, 11 ice creams, 3 dishes dried fruits, 2 ditto rout cakes, 2 ditto walnuts, 4 ditto pears, 2 ditto ripston pippins, 2 ditto nonpareils, 2 ditto golden pip pins, 3 ditto preserved ginger, 2 ditto strawberries. orange chips,fite. The four short tables in the Hall, next the Hustings; the five long tables on the Hustings; the four long tables in the body of the Hall ; the five aide tables; and these set out in the Court of King's Bench, were similarly supplied with dainty fare. Wsnss—Cbampagne,autere, hock, claret, madeira, port, sherry. CORK, NOVZII2IIII 7. IiiiiLANDHOLT AND FATAL Oocrouttrida.—lt is with sincere regret that we have the painful necessity of re lating the following calamity: The circumstance to which we allude is, that on Sunday morning, as one of our city Sheriffs, John Wallis, Esq. a Gentleman of as humane a nature, and as kindly feelings as ever filled his office, while patroling Barrack -street, attended by the peace officers of the city, arrested a man of the name of James Coghlan ; a struggle having ensued, provoked Mr. Wallis to strike the man with a loaded pistol, and, in the act of doing so, the contents of the pistol acci dentally went off into his head. The unfortunate victim lived only twelve hours after the melancholy occurrence. A Coroner's Inquest was held yesterday, and conducted with becoming rigour, when the following verdict was delivered: " That the deceased, James Coghlan, came by his death in consequence of a' shot from a pistol in the hand of John Wallis, Esq. one of the High Sheriff's of the City of Cork, which accidentally went of, while in the act of making a blow at the deceased, while he, the said Sheriff, was in the execution of his duty; but we tannot separate, without expressing our opinion, that strikiing a blow, when a loaded pistol was in his hand, Was indiscreet and imprudent." Monday. Major General the Hon. G. A. C. therit• yoN. chairman of the Victualling Board. and Fans. Baoacomaa, k:aq. and Dr. Busman, Commissioners, arrived at Plymouth on on eAcial visit. LAW R-EPOR T. COURT OF CHANCERY, Noveitun 9. 11l Tilt ALLEILID LIDO/MT OP LADY QIISLIT. Mr. Tnnter said he had to submit to the Court a petition, which be was glad to state would have the effect of putting an end to this matter. The prayer of the petition was, that the commission which bad been issued should be superseded, and to this all parties were consenting. The Loan Cumic.mLos appointed tO4IIIINTOW morning to bear the petition.• VISLIWT 11. MI WM Or sums:. This snit has been brought on the behalf of the infant children of the Hon. W. Y. Wellesley, against the Duke of Beaufort, and Sir Charles Begot, and others, trustees under the settlement made on the marriage of that Gentlemen with his late wife, in order to obtpintbe pre- tection of the Court for the various parties interested. Mr. SHADWILL this day appeared in support of a ptition presented in the names of the infant son of Mr. Wellesley, and the heir entail of the estates which are the subject of the suit, and of Mr. Aubrey, appointed by the Court to be the receiver of the rents of those estates. The petition prayed that Mr. Wright, the tenant of certain estates in Wiltshire, should be directed to deli ver up Draycot Park and the other estates within a week—that the rent proper to be paid by Mr. Wright should be ascertained by means of a reference to the Master, and that Mr. Wright should forthwith deliver up the key of a strong room at Draycot, in which cer tain title deeds and papers had been deposited, on pain of being committed to the Fleet Prison. The facts of the case were recapitulated in the petition, which stated the death of the late Mrs. Wellesley, in September, 1825, leaving the petitioner, her eldest son, surviving, who' became seised as tenant in tail under the will of his grandfather, Sir James Tylney Long, of the estates mentioned in the bill. That Mrs. Wellesley, by virtue of a power under the same will, appointed a sum of 1 3,0001. as portions for her two other children, and se cured the same by a term of 1,500 years, granted to the' Duke of Beaufort and Sir Charles Begot, as trustees for that purpose. The bill filed in this cause prayed, on be half of all the infants, that an account might be taken of all the estates, and a receiver appointed by the Court ; and in pursuance thereof all matters were referred to the Master. On the 12th of April last the Master made his report, by which he approved of Mr. Aubrey as the re ceiver, and directed the severa l t enants to attorn and to pay a ll arrears of rent, and all rent in future to grow due to him, in that capacity. Mr. Aubrey, on the 10th of July, served Mr. Wright, the tenant, with a copy of the Master's report, which had been confirmed by the Court, and required him to give up possession of three several farms, containing upwards of three hundred acres, one of which was alleged to be held at an inade quate rent. Mr. Wright refused to comply with this reque.t, but offered to attorn tenant to the heir in tail at the same rent. Mr. Wright was charged also, by the petition, to have refused to give up the key of the strong room, and to have ordered Ulm bucks in Draycot Park to be shot. Mr. HART, of Counsel for Mr. Wright, said he was prepared, if the Court should think fit, to go into the merits of this petition; but as there had been no notice served either upon Mr. Wright or upon Mr. Wellesley, for whom he was also counsel, he submitted that the petitioners had no sight to bring the matter on exparle. Mr. Sumswau. said, ducal) other notice was necessary thau what had been given. TheLonz CHANCELLOR did not know that a receiver, who bad been obstructed in the discharge of his duty, was obliged to give notice of his intention to apply to the Court against the parties by whom he had been so obstructed. Mr. Harr said, that supposing the received had been obstructed (which, however, he would by no means admit), still Mr. Wellesley's interest in the case was such as to entitle him to notice. The Duke of Beau fort, the Earl of Shaftesbury, Sir Charles Bagot, and Sir Edward Stracey, were also introduced into this petition, although they had no interest in this question. Mr. tinauvrim. said, that when those Gentlemen objected, it would be time enough to answer that observation. Mr. HART wished it to be understood, that he ap peared there as the Counsel of Mr. Wellesley, who claimed to be the natural and legal guardian of the children, and who would exercise the duties of that character until some other should be appointed by the Court. It bad been erroneously stated that Mr. Welles ley was abroad; he was, a this moment, in England. Mr. SHADWELL then read the affidavits in support of the petition, and also an affidavit which had been filed by Mr. Wright, who stated, that he held the estates, not as tenant, but as land agent, for Mr. Wellesley, to whom he had duly accounted for the proceeds ; that in April last he went to reside on Sidney Farm, which had been let to a Mr. Watts at 561. a year, and which, after the death of that person, as no o the r tenant could be found, be had taken at a rent of 961. and he had since expended considerable sums on the estate. That he had told Mr. Aubrey, when he demanded possession, that he acted only as Mr. Wellesley's agent, th a t the d eer i n Draycot Park were kept at Mr. Wellesley's expense, and bad been killed by his order, and that the key of the strong room had long been in that Gentleman's pos session. This affidavit, the Counsel contended, was no answer to the petition, nor offered any excuse for dis obeying the order of the Court. The property of the deer was clearly in the infant heir, and Mr. Wellesley had no right to oider them to be killed. Mr. Taarn.ovs, on the same side, denied that Mr. Wellesley bad any right, legal or equitable, which could justify him in giving to Mr. Wright the authority under which be pretended to have acted. • It might be con sistent with the object of the suit, that Mr. Wellesley should be made a party, but it was not necessary that he should have notice of this application. Plausible as Mr. Wright's affidavit was, a less satisfactory one to the Court could not be imagined. The assertion that he was land agent to Mr. Wellesley, who had no interest in the property, was only put forward to stop the re ceiver's mouth ; and although Mr. Wright said he had accounted for the profits of the estates, he would aot venture to say that be had made any payment to Mr. Wellesley since his wife's death. As to the deer, be might as well have said they were killed by the orders of one of the porters of Lincoln's Inn, who would have just as good a right to give such orders as Mr. Wellesley. He submitted that no answer had keen given to the case set up by the petition, and that the Court Would insist upon its orders being obeyed. Mr. Haar did not deny that an order of the Court, even if improperly obtained, ought to be obeyed, but he contended that Mr. Wellesley was entitled to notice. Mr. Wright's affidavit had been made gratuitously, and solely for the information of the Court. He bad been admitted tenant of the estates at a time when Mr. and Mrs. Wellesley were it the joint possession of them. The Loan CIANCRLLOi asked what lease Mr. Wright held of the farm? liAiss saki it was a parole lease. The LARD CMANCILLIAR said some of the facts now ' s ate bore upon the case in which he had been fur niched with such a mass of papers. He hoped to be able to discharge his duty respecting that petition very shortly. Mr. HART said that Mr. Wright was still willing to attorn tenant at the ancient rent: • Mr. flaikawau. replied. The LORD •CUA NCILLOR said, that this being an ap plication to the Court to commit a party for a breach of the orders of the Court, it was first to be seen whether /that breach had actually been made. There could be no doubt that the parties against whom such orders were made, had no right to judge whether they ought or ought not to be obeyed. The order appeared to be that the tenant in possession should attorn. Now Mr. Wright swore that be was not the tenant, and as it appeared that Mr. Wellesley was, upon him, and not upon Mr. Wright, the order should have been served. With respect to the bucks and the key, he thought nothing could be made of them. He should take care, in disposing of the other petition, that the estates should in future be so managed as to secure their full and uncontrolled enjoyment to the person entitled to them. He was anxious to dispose of that petition as soon as possible; and he must say, that in the whole course of his judicial life he had n ever h a d to di sc h arge a more painful duty than this business imposed upon him. The jurisdiction which he was called upon to exercise was a delicate but a necessary one. He was still much embarrassed in deciding where the truth of the case really lay. It was clear that there had been a great degree of immorality, brit not so much as had been represented to the public. The point for the consideration of the Court was, how far it was expedient for the interest as well as the welfare of the children that the parental authority should be controlled, and unless absolute necessity existed, that was an authority which the Court would very reluctantly assume. He should not fail to give his reasons at length for the course which he should think fit to adopt, and the parties should be in possession of them now in a very few days. At the same time he would decide the present petition, and whatever he might think of the order, he would take care that in future the owner of the estates should have the management as well as the enjoyment of his property. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Wawrienwern, Nov. 9. SINCLAIR P. MOLE AND Mr. SCARLETT applied to the Court, for a rule to spew cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial had. The action was tried before the Lord Chief Justice last Term, in this place, and a verdict found for 4201. It was brought by Mr; Sinclair, who is an eminent professional singer at Covent-garden Theatre, against the defendants, who are proprietors of that establishment, to recover upon a contract, a large sum of money, for not having employed him to sing during fifty nights, at the theatre. The declaration contained five counts, four of which set out that the defendants were to employ the plaintiff during the sea son at 201. a night. The cause was tried by both parties upon liberal admissions, and the production of letters. Mr. Scarlett now made his application for a new trial, on the ground that no part of the contract was proved, and that the Lord Chief Justice, in his address to the Jury, had been under some misapprehension respecting the counts in the declaration. The contract between the p irties was proved by a letter written by Mr. Chas. Kemble to the plaintiff. . The letter was dated 9th of Jane, 1824. "Mr Data Ma. Smarm—l received the letter from 'Mr. Trotter, in which he tells me you are willies to fulfil an engagement with Covent-Garden Theatre, on the following terms :—To com mence in October, say the first week—A new Opera will be ready for you, and we have another ready ; but in order for you to come out in it, it will be necessary for you to be here at least ten days previous, to attend rehearsals, &c. You will have leave at Christ mas and Easter, to be absent one week—Engagement fifty nights— Benefit first week in June if possible, and certainly not later than the second. Engagement to be ended the 15th of the month. Two new Operas you shall have if they are to be got. These are the conditions contained in the letter of your fatber-inlaw. Pray let me hear from you, and I will put something in readiness for you. C. KEMBLE.b' -- ----- Mr. Sinclair sent an answer, dated Merrion-square, Dublin : " I received yours of the 9tb of June ; I consider myself to be engaged next season. IwiU be in town to perform M the new Opera." A letter was written in reply by Mr. Fawcett, stating, that the arrival of Mr. Sinclair's letter had given great satisfaction, and his terms were acced Al to. He was to play fifty nights, and they were desirous he should come to town to attend rehearsals, as there was some difficult music to study. There was no further correspondence until the Ist of September, when Mr. Fawcett wrote a letter in these terms: " Will you be so good as to let us know on what day we may expect you in towns the sooner the better, u we ire going to get .up Der Frelschutz, which will take some time to study." On the 24th September Mr. Sinclair wrote word that he should be in town by the 15th of October. The Opera of Der Freischutz was announced for the 14th of Obtober, and as Mr. Sinclair would not arrive before the 15th , they were obliged to have another person to perform the principal character. Mr. Sinclair came to lawn on the 16th, when a conversation took place be- Ivreen Mr. Kemble, Mr. Forbes, and Mr. Sinclair. On tbat occafien the plaintiff expressed his regret that -he bad not arrived in time. They told the plaintiff they were willing to employ him if he chose to be re-engaged at 201. a night, and to those terms he acceded. Mr. Justice Baruty—Was there any answer to the plaintiff's letter of the 24th of September ? Mr. Seasurre—No, my Lord. The Learned CouNsar, then stated that the Lord Chief Justice was of opinion at the trial, that the con tract originally made, had been ended, and that the question did net apply to that contract. The new Opera of Der Frei:elude had a run of fifty nights. The season continued two hundred nights, and it appeared another Opera had been 4ot up with a :login; character for Mr. Sinclair, but it did not succeed. lhey, however, employed him in other singing parts nine nighti in the season. Upon the proof be had stated, the Learned Counsel contended the Jury had come to a wrong con clusion, and that there ought to be a new trial. The ouat granted a rule to shew cause. ?HZ =Ng V. •ICBDALL. Before all the Judges of the Courr sit every morning in e , full Court," as it is called, it is usual for one of the palate Judges to preside for the purpose of hearing and disposing of such common motions as require not the consideration of the whole Court. On Wednesday Mr. Justice BAYLEY sat for this purpose, when Mr. BnoDa• RICK moved his Lordship for a certiorari, to remove an indictment against the above defendant (charging him with an indecent assault upon a boy) into this Court for trial. The Learned Counsel stated, as we understood him, that an indictment had been preferred against the defendant at the Westminster Sessions, charging him with this offence, and while he was in custody on the charge he was liberated on his own recognizance, by the order of the Lord Chief Justice. Another iodic:- . meat had been preferred against him for the same offence, at the Middlesex Sessions, and the present mo-, ties% was to move that indieteatat into this Court for trial, substantially on the ground that the defendant could not have a fair trial at the Sessions. Mr. Justice &may—What are the facts stated, on which the cationsri is moved fort Mr. BROBIRICK said that Lieutenant• Colonel Arch dall swore a conspiracy was formed against him, and he alleged, among other circumstances, to shew that was the case, that very soon after the charge was made against him, he received numerous anonymous letters, intimating to him that if an advertisement were inserted in the Morning Herald, stating that " 3001. should be ready for A. B" at a certain place which the anonymous letter pointed out, the charge should be stopped. The defendant very properly refused to comply with thees solicitations; an as he swore he was by birth, habits, and conneximea Gentleman, he wished his trial should take place in this Court, because aggravated and dis torted staten(ents had gone forth in the newspapers, and had been circulated in hand-bills ; calculated to excite a prejudice in that class of society likely to act as petty jurors at the settings. Mr." Justice BAYLEY upon these grounds granted the certiorari. LOTD V. MIDFIELD. Mr. BROUGHAM moved for a new trial in this case. It was an action brought by the plaintiff, a Banker in London, against Messrs. Freshfield and Kay, Solicitors, to recover 7,0001. advanced to Mr. Charles Kay, as a loan, which had been applied for by a Gentleman named Lee. The defence was, that the money was not paid to Charles Kay as a partnership transaction, but to that Gentleman personally, and on account of a trans action in which the firm had no concern. On the part of the plaintiff, witnesses were called to prove that part of the money had been applied to the partnership business, and especially to a stock transaction for a Miss Fitz gerald, which the defendants had conducted as solicitors. The Jury, under all the circumstances, found a verdict for the defendants. It was now contended that there was proof that the defendants had been parties in re ceiving the money ; but the Court held that there was no ground to disturb the verdict.—Rule refused. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 9. SAVAGE V. LICH, BART. This was an action on a bill of exchange for 1,0001. accepted by the defendant. The cause had come on for trial before the Lord Chief Justice at Guildhall during the sittings before the present term. It appeared that in 1823, the defendant (then Mr. Rich) had occasion for 2,5001. and applied to a Mr. Joshua Rowe for the purpose of obtaining that sum. Mr. Rowe promised to let the defendant have the money he wanted, provided he would accept bills to the amount of 15,0001. which Rowe promised to provide for when they became due. The defendant had accepted eight of these bills for 10001. each, which were drawn at 36 months, and made payable at Messrs. Williams and Co. bankers in the City. It was for one of these bills that the present action was brought ; it had passed from the hands of Rowe into the possession of a person named Bowson, and from him into the possession of Messrs. Mayor and Hazard, from them to Messrs. Hobson and Marshall, again from them to Messrs. Boggis and Savage; a dis solution of partnership taking place between these last named parties, the bill was filially passed into the hands of Savage, the plaintiff, in the present action. Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN now moved to obtain a rule to shew cause why the •erd;ct which was found for the plaintiff should not be set aside and a new trial granted, on the ground that the evidence which had been pro duced at the trial had gone to shew that no value had been given by the parties for the bill in question, and that the verdict had been returned contrary to the opin'on of the Lord Chief Justice. The Loan Curar Justice said the vtrdict had certainly been re turned contrary to his directions, and be was surprised at it. The rest of the Court were of opinion that this was a sufficient cause to grant a ruk for a new trial.—Kule granted, Nommen 2.—Sraccut Jos:. soughs a rearoms. Verdict for the plaintiff. _The defendant was associated with the St. Patrick Insurance Office, one of the Irish underwriting Com - panics; established during t►e mania for Joint Stock Companies; the claim was for an average on the ship Indian Trader, on a voyage from Quebec to London. COURT OF CONDELEGATES, Nov. 9. No business of the least importance was transacted in the Court thi► day. NAVAL IN fELLIGENCE. —ono— Rumour's. Nov. B.—Wind N. to N.N.E.—Sailed the Flushing. Kos, , for Lisbon. PLisamsms, Nov. B.—Wind N.N.W.—Arrived the Brunton, Haaver, from St. Juba's, Newfoundl an d. Poansiousw, Nov. 9.—Wind N. to N.8.--Passed by. she Orbit, Fuu, from Baltimore • Ind th e Betsey and Sophi a , Gals. noway, from London for D ominica. Drag., Nov. 9. —Wind N.N. W.—Remains, the Robinson, —, from Malaga. Passed by front London, the Montrose, Romaian, for Trinidad ; Briton, and Breadalbane, %anon for Ja maica; and the Governor Haikett, Casa, for Sierra Leone. Gaavnlxo, Nov. 9.—Arrived from St. Petersburgh, the Dry dens, TAYLOR.; Hindostan, LAMB; George and An n , C ams; Sappho, Warta ; Mary, 811711111121• and the Wesleys, Tamar. Also, the Nancy, Boone, from Ar changel; William, M‘Kensiz, from Wismar; Thompson, Azar. from Rostock; Fortuna, TAW rya, from Allan ; Lord Abercromby, &reit, and Phenix, Oman, from Copenhagen; and the King of the Netherlands, &Amu, from Rotterdam.—Sailed the Briton, Forman, for Jamaica • Fez, Wang, for Malta; Glory, From a n d London, Gam, for Rotter dam ; Fame, HAvemt.o, and Stapler, auxins, for Hambnrgh ; and Bruce, Sng, far Sc. Lucia. Lrezaroot, Nov. a. —Arrived the Dorothy, Drama, from St. John's. Newfoundland. Sailed the Jane, fivivmrson, for Tam pleo • and Lyeurgus, Caawaraao, for Charleston. The Cynthia, for Barcelona, which was on shore on Hoyle Bank, has been got off, and brought into the River leaky, and with loss of fodder. Lord RODNItY, accompanied by his mother, the Dow. eget Lady RODX11; have arrived at Kiley, on a visit to their rela tives, Mr. and the Hon. Mrs. llama% Dispatches arrived at Calais 'on Tharsday evening, from loved °Lamm; addressed to Mr. Secretary CANIMIO 9 which were given by his Majesty's Consul, at Calais, in charge to Mr. Wirt" his Secretary, who proceeded in an open boat, at eleven o'clockat night,with them, during a heavy gale, and delivered them to the Agent of Packets at Dover, having landed at that place at lye o'clock the next morning, from a pilot boat, through a tre• mendous surf, which nearly swamped the boat. Mr. WTI& M. turned the next evening to Calais, via Boulogne, in which poet the vessel was obliged to take shelter, the wind being too violent to al. low of her attempting to enter QM. harbour. CORN EXCHANGE, MARK-LANE, Nov. 10. The Meiling trade is lively this morning, and line samples of Wheat obtained rather better prices than on Monday; but there is no amendment in the prices of the middling qualities. Floe malting Ruin is also free sale at Monday's quotation . ; but the grinding qualities madame to hang heavy on the stands. Oats are is. per quarter dearer, and rather free sale at that improvement. In other articles there la no akeration. SMITHFIELD MARKET. Nov. 10. The top price of the beat Beef is quoted at 4s. 10d, per stone; and the inferior is ss. Gd. to 4s. 2d. per atone. In Mutton, ins young Downs are quoted at 41. 4d. per steno; and coarser Sheep Ss. SI to 4s. per stone. Vealit tolerably steady at Gs. pet stone for the best young Calves; and 4s. to 4s. Gd. per stone for the coarser. In the Pork trade the variation is of little moment, dairy-fed Pork. era are quoted at Si. to Si. 4d. per stem; and larger cues at 4s. to 4s. Gd. per do.—Beasts, 930; Sheep, IMO ; Calves, 190 ; Pip, 122. Beef, per stone, 41. to 4s. 10d. Mutton, ss. id. to 4s. 4d. Veal, 44. to Si. Pork. 41. to Gs. 4d.—Hay, per bad, Al 10s. to AS's.. Conlon 101 , qsa ; &raw, 41 10s. to Ll las.