Star. — London, England, 1827-03-30 00:00:00

STATE PAPEIt. :ORREJTONDEvCE RELATIVE TO VIMMEECIAL INTER• COURSE. ICIWEIta THE UIIITSCD STATER OF AMERICA AND THE NATI H ,WEST INDIA C , LONIER, AUGUST, 1826. T JA RUA aY.1827. IMILSESITED TOROTH Houses OF PARLIAMENT, ST COMMAND 01 air atAJaaTT,IB27. ( Enclosure, in No. 1.) TOO sea ray emir TO TM It Null. C. C. 16 Department of ;kg', Dee. IS, 112.5. SIR-I have perused the letter which you left with me, and wi i:h is herewith returned. respecting the con struction put. at Halifax, upon the la.e l3,itish Act.of Parliament. opening the trade and intercourse between the &kid' American Colonies and foreign countries.— And I hare also examined the Acts of Parliatheot of the 4th and sth of GeOrge IV. referred to iu the 5 h section of the aboirementioned Act. The result is a belief, that the Halifax coristruction is not that which was intended by the Btiti>h Government, or, if it be, that it was designed by an Order n Council to except the trade and intercniose with the United States from the operation of the Act, when so interpreted. I should strongly incline to think, bet for the opposite view erer tettaited at Halifix, that the Act to regulate the trade of the British possessions abroad, passed in July last, did not intend to disturb or affect the trade between the British American C lonies and the 'United States, but meant to leave that trade on the footing which it was put by the aforesaid Act of the 4.h George IV. and the subsequent Act of Indemnity of the sth George IV. That the British Government did not look forwarcho such.an operation of the Act of Parliament as is about to be enforced at Halifax, I think clear, from the fol lowing considerations: First. It would be inconsistent with professions made by that Govetoment to this, and with negotiations be tween the two Governments, contemplated, if nut yet resumed. Second: No notificati , m has been given at Washing ton or at London of such a purpose as that which, for the first time, is indicated at Halifax. Third. The British Minister here is unadvised by his Government of any intention to close the Colonial ports against our vessels ; and Fourth. No information has been received here from any British Colonial port, except Halifax, of such in tention. I 1 the Halifax construction be correct, I am persuaded that the British Government must have intended to • have created an exception to our trade, by an Order in Council, which had not arrived at the date of the last advices from Halifax. _ _ It I am right in that conjecture, the Order may yet reach that place before, or a few days after, the day 6x , d (the sth of January next) for - the commencement of the Act. I am, ace. (tiva) H. CLAY. The Hon. C. C. Cambreltng, aft. xo 6.—am SZCSSTAST CATIROG TO /Mini. OACIATIN ' Foreign aloe, Jan. 47, 1147. The Undersigned, &c. has the honour to acknow ledge the note addressed to him on the 28th ult. by Mr. &c. in replying to which, the Undersigned will, as far as possible.sonform himself to the example of Mr. Gallatin, in putting aside those points of the question in agitation between them which have been already exhausted in argument, and the further discus sion of which would not tend to any practical advantage. The parts of Mr. Gallatin's note which appear to the Undersigned to require any observation, relate to mat firs' rather of fact than of reasoning. Mr. Gallatin complains that the Act of Parliament of 1525 was not officially communicated to the Guvern anent of the United States. it is perfectly true that it was not ; nor has it been the habit of the two Governments to communicate reci procallyto each other Acts of their respective legislatures. The Act of Congress of 1828, an Act, the prov.sio'ns of which specially affected Great Britain;was not offi cially communicated either to the King's Minister at Washington, or to his Majesty's Government by the American Minister resident at Ibis Cour t. So far from any such communication being made, or any voluntary explanation of the bearing of that Act being offered, it was not till after repeated and pressing inquiries that' his Majesty's Minister at Washington succeeded in ob taining from the American S:cretary of State the true construction of the most important clause of that Act— the clause in which the United States claimed that then trade to the British West India Colonies should be put on the same footing with the trade to the same Colonies from " elsewherr;" and learnt, to Iris great astonish ment, that under that word " elsewhere" was intended to be signified, not only the other dependencies of Great Britain, but the " mother country itself." The Undersigned, at the same time, begs that it may not be supposed that the British Government withheld from the Government of the United States a communi cation of the Act of Parliament of 1825 from any notion of retaliation for the omission of the Government of the United Stares to communicate to that of his Majesty the Act of Congress of 1825. He refers to that•instance of omission on the part of the American Government only in proofs • First, That the ordinary and natural course between States is not to make di?liimatic communications of the Acts of their respective Legislatures; and,. secondly, vat nn inference could be drawn from such an .omis sion on the one side any more than on the other, of ( • hat the Undersigned disclaims fur his Govern men ) , an intenticual want of courtesy or respect. But the Act of 1825 di i not relate specially to the United States. It held out to pll nations of the world certain benefits. (or what were believed by the British Government to be so) on certain cgoditions. If a communication of the Act had been made to one nation, it must have been made alike to all. Such communicati..n would have been liable to different mis repiesentations: s.•me Governments right have coml• dried it as a solicitation to which they were bound iu courtesy to give some answer, explaining their reasons for declining. if they did i'ecline, to avail themelves of the ptovisions of the Act: others mi b ;ht, perhaps. have taken umbrage at it, as an. authoritative pretension to impose the legislation of this country upon other nations. The simplest course was to allow the provisions , o 1 the Act to find their way to genet al knowledge through the usual channels of commercial information. The Undersigned has no reason to apprehend that this course has proved less effectual en the present than on fain er occasions. Thr coriduir.ns of the Act of 1825 have been ac cepted and carried into effect by some Governments: chat of the United S.aies has not t' ought it expedient to take advantage of them. But theUnaletsigned cannot but be still of opinion. that the resolution the House of Representatives, at beginning of the last Session of f. press purpose of urging the esecoti the United States to come into the 1825,,thedebates which took place tion,,and the final rejection of it two votes, shear t} at was not for want . understanding of the intent of the Act of Parliament, that the conditions of it were not accepted by the Visited States. To one piece of evidence, which proves the perfect fanderstaniting in America,not only of the purport and provisions of the Act of Parliament of 1825, but of the• conditions which it would.be requisite for the American ,Ingislature to per form,in order to entitle theUnnedStates to the benefit of that Act, the Undersigned might have scrupled to refer (as not being of the nature of a diplo matic document); if Mr. Gallatin had not encouraged him to bring forward any document tending to throw light on the vr(ter in dispute, by citing, in support of his own view of that matter, a private letter from Mr. Clay to a Menitter of Congress. • Early in the Session of Congress of 1825.26, a peti tion from Baltimore was presented to both Houses of the American legislature, in which petition it was dia. tinctly pointed out, that the British Act of Parliament of July, 1825, had not only manifested the readinessof this country to remove all discriminating duties, but also to permit American ships to clear out from British Colonies, not, as theretofore, to the ports of the (joked States only, but to all parts of the world (the United Kingdom and its dependencies alone excepted). The petition, with equal distinctness, invited the at- tention of the American Legislature to the condi tops on which these advantages might be secured to the United States, and prayed for the removal of the rte.' vetsl restrictions imposed by the American Act of IN% not of the " discriminating duties" only, but of the prohibition, of what is called by Mr. G tllatin, "cir cuitous intercourse in British ships ;" the petitioners ex pressly submitting to Congress the propriety of ad mitting British vessels, from whatever ports, on the same terms as the vessels of the most favoured nations. It appears from the reports of the proceedings of Congress, that it was against the prayer of this petition (but without impeachment of any of its allegations) that the decision of the American. Legislature, at the close of the Session, was taken: it cannot be doubted, therefore, that the American Legislature had the whole ' purport and bearing of the Act of 1825 full before their eyes. The fact, that some of the British Authorities abroad took upon themselves to suspend the execution of the Act of 1825, towards the United States, is undenied. But the only effect of this suspension was—the con tinuance of the benefits of the then existing state of things to the United-States, for nearly a twelvemonth longer than they would otherwise have enjoyed it. That continuance was permhted by the British Go vernment mainly in consideration of the then pendency in the Legislature of the United States, of theresolution herein before mentioned, for conforming to the condi tions of the Act of 1825. Immediately upon the receipt of authentic intelli gence of these proceedings at IVashington, an instruc tion was sent out to Mr. Vaughan, grounded on the belief of the British Government, that Congress would not separate without adopting the resolution then under their consideration. In that case, and upon receiving an assurance from the American Government that the restrictions and charges on British shipping, and British colonial produce, would be withdrawn by the United Stotts, Mr. Vaughan was authorized to deliver a Note to the American Secretary of State, declivhsg—that the discriminating duties imposed opon American ships and their cargoes in the/Vest Indies should immediately cease. Mi. Vaughan was actually in possession of this instruction, when the resolution. on the assumed adop tion of which the instruction to Mr. Vaughan had been founded, was :ejected. It was no part of Mr.Vaoghan's duty to make any communication upon the subject to the American Government before the result of the dis cussion was ascertained. After that tenth, (wholly un expected in this country,) any such communication would have been not only useless, but might, perhaps, have been considered as an improper appeal against the formal decision of. the American Legislature. That Mr. Vaughan should not afterwards have been authorized to enter into any discussion of the provisions of the Act of 1825 " so late as October last." is not surprising, when it is considered that Mr. Vaughan, immediately after the close of the session of Congress, was instructed to announce the intention of his Mi. jesty's Government to pass the Order in Council of July (consequent upon the decision of the American Legis lature), by which the terms of the Act of 1825 were virtually declined. Mr. Gallatin accounts for the rejection of the reso. lotion proposed to the American Legislature by the persuasion which, he says, the Government of the Uni ted States entertained, that the negotiation on the sub ject of the commercial intercourse between the United States and the British West India Colonies would be renewed. The Undersigned is at a loss tolunderstand oa abot grcund it was assumed at Washington that there would be, at all times, an unabated disposition on the part of the British Government to make the trade to its West India Colonies the subject of diplomatic arrangement. The circumstances of the case were entirely changed. Repeated negotiation had failed to produce any material approximation of opinions upon that subject. 1 The last attempt at an adjustment had been made with an evident conviction on both sides that there existed between them an unconquerable difference of principle, and that it w•as by that difference, rather than by any deciJed irreconcileableness of interest, that a satisfac tory arrangement was rendered hopeless. The nature of that difference has been sufficiently discussed; it, lies in the determination of the United States to dispute, and in that of Great Britain to main tain, the estatilished distinction between general and Coln ial trade. Great' Britain had, therefore, an obvious motive for doing thenceforward whatever she might think it right t•r do in relaxation• of her Colonial system, rather by the instrumentality of her own Legislature, than by compact with a State with which she disagreed in opi nion as to the principles of Colonial trade so widely, Neat it would have been impossible to construct a pre amble to a treaty on that sutiject, in Vie ounciations of which the two contracting parties sh• old have con curred.—But there was yi t another reason tor avoiding further negotiations upon the:eject. Hitherto, when the trade with the Dritish Wettlndia esolntion proposed sti'loaiigils4 Weis opened at all, it ha i bee it • Washington, st the chit*, though not exclusively, to the United Congress, for the es. To uotther country bad it been opened b cotive Government of , and positive convention. he terms of the Act 4lf nit a time had now arrived when, from n ice upon that proposi• policy, Great Britain thought it adl by a majority of onii *mess to her Colonies to all foreign Poi or want of a sufficient out exception, no conditions ten2ered alike tc L of r • i Uai . the I - W ' , , ' the L F Stai • .i Act • V ep. , t' , at I aim ... ( ,[ r ,an ii i 1 Un ili, . CO' GO . t • :'' not COI I i . I reF det cal lot %Iv tal itn I. v thi till I 1 1 • t 4 on ce ti , to !, .. • , t,': A . ..,.. ~• ... been open , ' St ties by specific motives of advisable to Powers with• te to all. amen indiscriminate opening could only be effected. by some process common to all those who were per. mitted or invited to take advantage.of it ; impartiality'' was thus maintained tow aids all par ties, and the.power of tonttotil over her own colonies was at the same time retained in' he hands of the mother country. The Undersigned believes that he has flaw touched on every topic in the last trite addressed to him by Mr. `Gallatin, to which he had not had occasion to advert in former stages of their correspondence. He will not allow himself t's be drawn again into a discussion of topics already more than sufficiently debated. The Undersigned trusts that it is unnecessary for him, in concludine this note, to retorts to Mr. Gallatin as-' surances of the friendly disposition of the United States of America—assurances equally sincere, that there is the most cordial desire, on the part of Great Britaiu, to cultivate the friendship of the United States. The ties of common origin, laws, and language, must always form strong bonds of national alliance between them. Their respective interests, well understood, hat. monise together as much u their feelin4gs. But it has never yet been held a duty of intern itional amity (any more than of friendship in private life) to submit to unequal. compacts ; nor has it ever been held an offence against such duty that a nation (any more than an individual) should decline to make cocoas pensated sacrifices. Between two nations, as between two individuals, mot friendly to each other, there may sometimes hap pen, unfortunately, to exist sonic known subject of in curable difference of opinion. In any such case it is, perhaps, most advisable to keep that subject as much as possible out of sight, and to take care that it shall not interfere with the tenour of their general intercourse and of their habitual relations. _ _ ...... . ..._ . The refusal to regulate the trade of our colonies by a commercial tre ity which the British Government may think (even if erroneously) disadvantageous to its interests) cannot give just cause of offence to Any Power whatever. . In the present instance the Undersigned is must happy to be able to qualify such renal with the declaration, that it is not in any degree dict sted by sentiments either unfriendly or di , respectful to the Unitel S ates, or by any indifference to the amicable settlement of all either questions at present pending between them and,Gleat Britain. Of these questions, one has been already happily ar ranged since illr. Gallatin's arrival in this country. The Undersigned looks forward with confidence, no less that with anaiety, to such an arrangement of the remainder, as, effacing all traces of past discussions, and satisfying all fair and reasonable preten+ions on both sides, may secure for a long period of years to come, reciprocal good understanding and goodwill between two kindred nations. The Undersigned has the honour, &c. (Signed) GEORGE CANNING. Albert Gallatin, Eq. acs. ice. ke. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OP CHANCERY, Mates se. OLASSISGT3W V. =WAITS& The LOAD CHAMCILLott vacationed this case this morning, and said he thought that the best thing he could do was to set aside ell the proceedings (sttbse-, quent to the first thing called a disclaimer and answer),l with costs. His Lordship added, That he would draw up the order himself. (N VIZ MATTER OF THE REV. MR. FRAWKS, A LUNATIC. Mr. HEALD stated, that there was a Petition presented in this matter, from which it appeared, that Sir W. Cooke, who was Committee and Receiver of the luna tic's property, had been placed in a predicament in which it was not likely he could receive the rents, with out compelling the tenants to pay a second time from the following circumstances:--Two persons whom the lunatic had employed to manage his affairs before the i,suing of the Commission, had employed a third per son to give notice to the tenants that large sums in the way of annuities were due to them prior to the finding of the inquisition, and they meant to distrain upon the tenants on the 6th of April. The present application therefore, was, that the Court would grant an injunc tion to restrain such a proceeding on the part of the annuitants. His LonosuiP granted the injunction, intimating that though annuitants were entitled to have the'r payments made to them, yet that when a receiver had been ap• pointed, they could not virtually lorevi mum tura him out without coming to the Covet. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. —ow-- HORSHAM, Mmica U. 002711. SOLIS. This was an action for assault and false imprisonment. The plaintiff is a hawker of tea, and the defendant is one of the Headboroughs of Worthing, and an inspector of hawkers' licenses. On the day in question, the de fendant met the plaintiff in Worthing, and first collar ing him, insisted on the production of his license, which, after some hesitation,he produced. The defendant then went away, but in the course of the same day, meeting ,him again, he collared, and told him he had a warrant against him. •He detained him some time, but at last let him go: It was proved, that at the time be had no warrant against the plaintiff. The Jury, under the direction of the Learned Judge, found for the plaintiff—Damages 101. THE LINO V. MEL FORREST, alias FORBES. The indictments against this Lady for the affair at the New Sreyne, Brighton, which excited so much con versation last Autumn, were expected to have beer tried this day (Wednesday)in the Nisi Frith Court, and in consequence the Court was crowded to excess., Owing, however, to the length of time wh eh a cause bights up in the list occupied, they were deferred till to-enorrow. The interest excited by the affair here is very gr Sat; it forms the constact theme of conversa tion. There are seven indictments in all, charging as , many different specific offences. The number of wit nesses to be examined is very gt eat, and it is ender:toed that Mr. Bitaaciwitbe prosecutor) will spare no *ler. tions nor expense to secure a conviction. it is said that the majority of the inhabitants- of Brighton highly, Ipprove of he clams adt*ed r.y Mr. BA (MOW. The :ri it of :Az first indictmcut alouc is ezpec:ed to last the whole disy. •• POLICE igl a tl.t..lolllgct. Nt A XStoIf , HOUVR. The clerk to Moen. Wulf* and Dorelik. albs . as from Liver pont last week on a charge of forgets, war, y brought up far tamaminatirts, whey on esatniaitig ti e Oro. 111. tsp. 8111, It was fiend that his cat. did not aria the esseeing el the mamas. and he was caosequeotly diekit aa a. GOILDHALf. Ads Ckessky. a permr,in the employ et kit Gregory. a mirchant is lipitaidaids., was charged With steArit a H e teak Site primate kite his @nuke with yi k • ht &tog him grid wages and a strict cacao., ft ft Meaty. Mr. Gregory was wider contract t., Meaty tam of pertains as the City inches in Be,,bekia,‘. i n s gyfecese was enspimed with Wars is the delivery. =ea of Ma Charity , araci if counting tits at e of dboodei, 0,000,Wd lientelf with having this kir ametinspbetalevrledow, and eambeeed wins they _ milsy—••• shat as Oftesi as the nom. who e un g l ;Ira =Lsack epos shouislars a eonkl throw this walier aa ta4; P with the sack just iwortiod. An had a wet fall cheap at any green-grorter's ie the withbourinna. Mr. C ketkeard a a seek of pursues being ao disposal el at Itiderdesa's In a corn near the lionisation ; sad arm r a ng was abbey idatatify the propen y. tbelotatoes brine of a eery rior and pecedhat deactiptisa, waraled.Wirliinstnos, the ',Yak which he bad purchased, and had Mid nine except to the , Charity. They were grown on Mud Lined, in the „wade Dageoham W. Banks Parried. on the part of the Cbarky,stated„ ficiency of 470:0011rt. bad been discovered, and he sawnsaad must have stolen one sack out of !very Moe they had to de• s et Alderman Csowsita remarked, that it was not kik warn, would keep a man honest, *here the moral principle oi l . mined ; and at the same time expreard his surfeit*, din , tensiee depredatioos on the Charity had escheat earlier iliseole n t The evidence against the prisoner ant Wag Caladaigr i reiWadded. • Hosteosetwete.,-Ifesterdtp a mill of neepeetabb In m a n; and who is said to be connected widen family of ewes raft e neighbourhood of Birtningbani, was brought op by Furious en various charges of borsestealing. Thu mu m - 4 • theunircharse entered into at present, the absentee( dos bu t h e. country rendering it impossible to give mellow usher:—ln the month of September last the primmer in the neighbourhood of Birmingham, from wiles &tidy disappeared, and at the arty period of slu e a mare, the property of a Gentleman named Downier, lel a of . equal value, brimming to Mr. Evans, both near lAnsiesita ias were missing. Nothing was beard of the horses wed a [hart 'i3o, When an advertisement appeared in mew • sat pervolescribing the animds, and stating that they b./ under suspicions circumstances at the Bell Inn, at Innis, ingisamehire. Mr. Dawkins. a beery-stable keeper, •AL street saw the adeettisementond kneeling theberee, went to cla im them ha behalf of their respective owners; het prietor of the inn refused to deliver them up without ride aetherity. The groom it Mr. Downing and another then went to Winslow, and ft appeared from the unease propiieute of the Bell, that in September last the brought the horses to that inn, and represeating himself owner of them. desired them to be well taken care of until, ptaio. He left ao address fs London, and occasionally Winslow to idehow the horses "got on." He always he wished to have especial care taken of them, and to got into raring condition. Upon his last visit be Jelled horses might be put out to grass, and said he should be t h e. 'hardy. Some months, however, having elapsed "envie making his appearance, or any communicatioo being received hint, the proprietor of the Bell suspected something vercas, caused the sidesals to be advertised. On Wednesday a entrant applied for at chiseller for the apprehension of the premier. Furies, found him in the neighbourhood of VauchalL some declined saying anything for the present, and we, . for farther smantiasties. WORSHIP-STREET. , Yesterday the time of the Sitting Magistrates (Mr. and' lir. acinirrn) was occupied almost exclusively in of weseesonces connected with she general strike of 401041Stiollsk 1 AlehateiNatep, aged nineteen. but in appearance not . fommiltusillesen, was brought to the once, charged wateshei4 of an outrage on Tuesday. A .lik. named Powell, mated that a great number sem, boys tike the primate mist to the home - - bee .Air. Curtis, who le a causer. YIN deer bee and nearly twenty of them,roshed t e til tiro, tea twitted en having her husband awe, ..... ewe of the family came rowed the back way torthe virus; bemediately west to their assistance, sod a.ked Ale • was they wanted ? They replied, that they were " poll ell the weavers out of their looms, Man mom the a He remoostrated with them, and at Art.* succeeded them away ; but the prisooer shaking a " rattle' in his said that he would " cat hie heed before night." Joseph Curds stated to the seine effect, and added, that supposed the persons to be weavers, he should hare proceeded stairs to them himself. The greater pan of them. hooveer. weavers, but persons who take advantage of the utmost, a pretence for their going abet for the purpose of doing mit . Mr. Twireuen--Yets, m a weaver, can tell se whether been any resoludon passed es preview the journeymen from Curtis said, he knew of no such resolution. There ,- FI 4 stand.our." he said, but there had not been ag of the trade; only meetings of the workmen trent shops. Mr. Touroes—What man do you work for? He said he worked for Messrs. Stephen Wilson and Wood -street, Cheapside, and for Messrs. Joseph :dad Stcpbea ten, of WUsoo-street, Mornleids. In answer to further questions, he stated that be aad.._ workmen had a meeting the slay before, and kV a deputatioa their employers. The answer they received item eye d employers was, that if certain other homes which be r conned to the full price, he would do the same. Mr. Tss 4 vreass—What do you townie was the object persons who came to your house ? Curtis—To compel me to go to the meeting. Mr. Bistuairr now took his seat on the bench, and rout caused the evidence to be repeated to him. Mr. Beatisavo-1 am sorry to we a boy like the prisoner a dtussies but these &dap meat be repressed, and • or boys are concerned, thty must be punished. After some further inqdirtea, two perms', boggebaltira. admitted 'shall, ia the sum of 401. each, fee the primed' behaviour, and be was discharged. The Church-yard of the Psrish Church of . tin's-in•the Fields was surrounded Wedoesdsy high wooden paling, preparatory to the removal tombs and head•stones of those interred there, provernents rendering it necessary to carry the way over that space hitherto occupied as ground. DIRD. Wednesday evening, the Rev. K. T. Jews, Minis&e* Islington and Silver street Chapel, when just upon the ete own door, and in the act of raising his,hand to the knocker. deny feU back, and expired without a green. The 45th Instant, at Wottan-toader-edge, Gloucestershire , Kee. John Taylor. At Glasgow, on the 20th instant, while visiting a wife of the Rev. Wm. Houtkdge, Iditgliter of the Chapel in that city, aged 64. At Portabghur, near Neernutch, eo the 14th Oct. jlnd Adjutant Joh ni Wyllie, of the Rampouragb Local raged 49 years. This Maass served for several years i Marine Artillery, and was. the eldest sun 0 Juba Holmbead, Kilmarnock. - min* —vast liaL ma. am. a • • -• 0 Dublin Waterford G..timea and Jersey Lisbon lloaagitadee Bums Aires Holland Frani • Minton Fluidics Sweden Brasil Jamaica LAVI and Islands d H- Ark*. at LONDON-UR' Morning Attarneas 13G li TO 34 ntintitro flier 4 33 miaow saw 4 Loaners Printed awl Publi4ind by Joan Xmas, rier PPolwall at AC &an Orr llle s bio. 1. riatatinacai Tes.l•4lo. .4 trtl • • et, estrt.:.f . Aci 4 ad why y -- huge& ▪ litre • 44 4 a X."' " a tbar J e g oad And Mr 11. kal e " fat d ig i. at * aim e 4 V Wave r Orr? a s i L lit "Pn - au G .14401 " at a M t. • • 4 , 111 :. • int de% 9 cri vt, 7 MAN* 6‘ &at a 4 6 . tko Lea • lata.* dearer. lim 'Nei that rat s e e m a thnee a. • ii• c°•PW. ba wee ; "r• 771" , "Plowleat, 1 Nat e l . " 0 9 ail • • di Wae atitatre e a " tal • rem' taw &rag Tagil k ate la& ally a Wu* id* ad a been • Pinblbala, chart Wet * Neviree. d bees w e do*, Clak. Wavy. , Vent Awn "14 hat the ps. • mate ega. *her me mot Si Is Ail ha plows elf to bathe leta acme Gal laid e sisal that • bare tbm iced trade s . r there agea W witb..at :view! Lon • avast, 'Ad warrataws tri,aaer, al U. Thal . es aeleialdel S. - • fr. Tomas • n the boats . 1 . T the hit* • more dia ged sahibs' • amber of pa. et of W. mu as Was sped iE si ad pe.bed fa ma his lona._ witness, who N n men 'kat it *abscised to `° e mectag."— • led ia salting •" C is face, Lana- ,that onOod dos ; nom IR mg 4 1, an. awking k bc" g rdwidot. hand *is Sy s soak umbingt aew e was also/ sad m any pawl tiara amen d dd. 7 c tad Sass, 4 Stephen Wab. • adbis falser. RI deputation to we el their be yawed to. object d t h t ,2 ./ 111 MI Mr. ifte. 14 4 Tr lamer is sttd rer I whether ass 111 tar kaltlect. 10 / 4 +Moods soi av of St. Ma. dap 'aid, - 4 Donal of di use, the for :he canine a battier liniater d Ile the step d 1M i macaw. he sod , ran Aire. the a him!, hog the £1 684 11 04 tt. Umtata cal Bambow up in die WWI WlEtt. iy MLR. 114.1. • a I O 3 O I • I • O a O do , o Wait IttO. ea atter 4 le shot 4 dla sisal S ' atiokka.