Star. — London, England, 1827-11-06 00:00:00

The steps to be:feksita listWes•the irder prayed for *nigh ishimately lead to the instituting of proceedings against Mr. Wellesley. After some further observations the order Was granted. ROLLS COURT, Nov. S. The MASTeR of the ROLLS resumed his sittings this Owning. His Honour was occupied upon petitibas the whole of the evening. COURT OF JUNG'S BENCH, Wismatoirrea, Nov. 5. BUTT O. IZARRIL This was enaction to recover money had and received. The defendant pleaded the statute of limitations. Mr. BROUGHAM stated the plaintiff's case. The plaintiff, Mr. Butt, a member of the Stock Exchange, had employed the defendant as an agent to receive cer tain debts due to him of several persons. The defen. dant received these sums, amounting to 2,6871. but having received notice from a body of persons calling themselves the Committee of the Stock Exchange, that buthe ought not to pay the money to the plaintiff, to themselves, he, the defendant, influenced by their de. mands and threats, handed it over to those persons, who applied it to charitable purposes, Charity was no doubt a most laudable virtue; but then these Gentlemen ought to have remembered that charity begins at home, and that there was little merit, and less justice, in being charitable at the expense of another. The defendant having omitted to pay the plaintiff these monies so re ceived fur him, the plaintiff, of course, sought to obtain iv by the present action. As to the objection intended] vs be made against his claim, on the ground that the affair occurred in 1814, and that the claim was there. fore . batted by the statute of limitations, he should bsing forward witnesses to prove the plaintiff's admis sion of the debt within the period required by law. Mr..Pattiaell, a banker, proved the handwriting of the defendant, and a conversation with him within the last three weeks on the plaintiff's present claim of debt. the subject of the present action. The claim was under stood to have arisen out of the . Stock Exchange trans action of Lord Cochrane and Mr. Butt, in 1814, for which Mr. Butt had been tried and convicted. The defendantisaid. be had doubts whether he should not let judgment go by default. After some further examination of this witness by Gunmat, The LORD Cum: Juirrics here said, he considered the affair to be a time bargain. Mr. Baononam instantly abandoned the case, and the, plaintiff was nonsuited. . _ Till LING, AT Till PIVSECUTION OF RAINS. This was an indictment charging the defendant with wilful and corrupt perjury. .Mr. CAMPBILL stated the case for the prosecution. the facts appeared to be these: Mrs. Beaumont, a . Lady of rank, gave an order to the house of D. and W. Bailey, itomfounders, to construct the frame work of a conservatory for tropical trees. The expense of the work w,as estimated at 4,0001. and 1,0001. for two steam. boilers. The structure was setup, but not being satis factory to Mrs. Beaumont, the latter declined paying the stipulated expense. Messrs. Bailey brought an action in the Common Pleas to recover the amount of the value of the structure. Qn that trial the present defendant (Raine), sfeward to Mrs. Beaumont, deposed, that he did not know of any estimate of the cost of the conserva tory, he having stated in a letter written before the trial his knowledge of the existence of an estimate. On this contradiction of his sworn testimony by his written statement the present charge of perjury was founded. Mr. Frederick Hughes, shorthand writer, deposed that be took down in short hand the evidence given by the defendant on the trial in the Common Pleas. A transcript of part of the notes of the trial was here read. The CHIEF JUSTICE interrupted the progress of the cause by observing, that though it was clear the de., fendant stated he did not know of any estimate, it also appeared that he said he knew of a letter on the subject of the p: ice of the conservatory. It was evident he was labouring under tome confusion of ideas, and did not understand the question about the estimate; but before the prosecutors could accuse a man of perjury they ought w make him understand the questions, on the answers to which they founded the charge of perjury. His Lordship directed the Jury to acquit the prisoner— they accordingly declared him 4 , Not Guilty." BAKER AGAINST Till HON. CAPT. GRANTLITV BERKELEY. This was an action of trespass and assault. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated the case.—At one period of our history the people of this kingdom were oppressed by the forest laws, within the purlieus of which the King was at liberty to pursue his game without re gard to private rights. At the present time, however, but few of those places remained. Many of the Jury, from their rank in life, were probably addicted to field sports, and loved hunting; but it was proper that they and all the nation shouli know, that as the people at one time complained of their King, so an individual might now complain of any of his fellow subjects who should insist upon trespassing over his property.— By the law of the lantl, the most insignificant person had the same right to enjoy his property without violation that the highest Peer possessed. There was no difference, and if the labourer and farmer chose to occupy their farms without being trespassed upon by hunters, they had a right so to do, and the man who opposed that right, and in defiance of it, committed a trespass, whoever he was, was amenable to the law. The plaintiff in January, 1824; had given, express notice to the defendant and to others, that he did ant choose to have his lands trespassed upon, for they were off nature that would stiffer much damage from the,trampling of horses. Notwithstanding this notice, the injury complained of wet committed on the 31st of December last, when the defendant, accompanying his own stag hounds, pursued the snag across the plaintiff's pr,operty, committing considerable damage. The plain tiff was in his farni.threshing out his oats, and the gates of his barn were opee.The stag had been much worried, and was exhausted ;tile clear proof of it was that it took refuge among the habitations of menjor it took the direc tion of the barn, followed by the dogs and huntsmen. The plaintiff, aware he had, given notice, stood by his gate and opposed all entrance. Ile was apprehensive that so great a number of persons, pith their horses and dogs, would destroy his oats as they had destroyed his eau. He locked the door of the barn; but while he was attempting to do it, the difendant, saying .1. Will any body help me to pull the barn down?." aimed a blow at him, and with the assistance of his friends attack ed my client, who, for having committed the heinous offence of locking up his own door, was knocked down, his face made all bloody Irom his mouth bleeding ; and to add to his distress, his wife, wbo was pregnant at the time, saw what was done, and rushed to his assistance. The defendant, after the notice he had received, ought in prudence, and in compliance with .the rights of others, to have abstained from coming on his land at all. The damage done to his property was a matter of calcdta non, the injury to the plaintiff's person and the insult to his feelings were far more serious. Thomas Forster, a farmer, eiamlned by Mr. ALDER.. SOL pstesed the notice served upon the defendant in the 23d of January, 1824. James Page, a labourer of the plaintiff—Witness wits at work in the field rat theta adily after laseChristrnas Day. Saw the stag come over the field. There were • great many dogs after it. Witness Went to lassiit Ms master. Many horsemen trent crver the hedge galloping. The stag ran over the plaintiff's field into the road, and turned in the direction of the plaintiff's farm yard, where witness saw • a great many. people: The plaie tiff Was closing the •barn to keep the people oair. The defendant, dressed in an orange-cdoured coat, With many people with him, was trying to pull him away. Witness saw the defendant strike the plaintiff, but whether he first struck him with the 'fist or whip'he could not say. The plaintiff's mouth was full of blood. Witness saw the defendant then lift up his whip to strike the plaintiff, because he would not let him go into the door, andanother man, named Davis, stopped the blow, which was with the but•end of the whip. They forced the barn open by main force. The defendant said he would tear the barn down. A great number went in then. The deer was in the barn. The plaintiff had been threshing oats, which lay all about the floor. They were spoiled by th e feet of the people. 'Witness was , struck several times offer the arm and head; the blow over the head would have much hurt him, had it not been for his hat. Cross-examinel by Mr. BROMMAII—Mr. Norton was at the hunt; he was a very respectable Gentleman, Witness did aot hear any one say that if the plaintiff would let them in he would give compensation. James Davis, another labourer, saw the whipper-in ask the plaintiff to let him in,'which the plaintiff did, along with two Gentlemen dressed in the Berkeley hunt drew. Witness saw the defendant alter that go to the barn-door, and say to the plaintiff, "What do you do ff here?' The plaintiff said, .. I have a rightto clew my own door." On a hich the defendant strock him' in the Mouth. Witness saw the blood coming from the month The deferidant struck at the plaintiff aith the butt-end of his whip; wit, e,s caught the blow on - hie arm, 'and it hurt him very Much. Defendant asked withess'What he had to do with it ? to which witness said, he should not.strike any one there. The defendant then Struck wit ness twice. The defendant cried out to the ether, Will I you help me?" They said, " Yes." 1 4 Then," said he .. 111 tear the'b—y barn down." A gentleman interfered. Cross-examined.—Witness saw the defendant's nose bleeding ; never heard the defendant say anything about compensation; be struck defendant once. One man had a pitchfork, but did not use it. Thomas White, another labourer, saw the defendant go up to the barn door, and ask the plaintiff why he shot it? The plaintiff said, he had a right to shut his own door. The defendant said, "If so be you don't open it, I'll cut your d—d old head off, you son of a b—,," - and shoved the plaintiff, who called for assistance. Witness ran to help him, and kept the crowd off as well as he could, and received several blows, and was spurred in the leg. William Poulton, butcher, saw Mrs. Baker coming Out crying, " For GOD'S sake help my husband, he will be killed." Witness went toms assistance, and received 'a blow on' the face from the but-end of a whip. - The plaintiff was trying to lock his barn door, and witness saw the defendant lift up the end of his whip to strike him, and if it had hit him, witness thinks it would have split his skulL There was a great scuffle. The defendant said " he would knock thet —y barn down." They got the barn door open. Cross-examined by Mr. Cm:wools—Witness did hear the defendant say the dogs would worry the deer. The plaintiff said, "Which is Grantley Berkeley, he shall g o in." Witness had the pitchfork, but he would swear he did not thrust at any Gentleman, and that the pitchfork did not stick in the upright of the barn. The stag was alive, but a good deal gored and worried. Joseph Atkins, a farmer, estimated the damage done to the land at-1 1 91. 12s. 6d. Mr. Bannon/ix said, he had ( - hen wondered at the great ingenuity of his ft iend in dressing up a case to the Jury, but seldom more than on the present occasion, for, like a great artist, he had contrived to elevate his ob ject, which was a very homely one, and begun with the forest laws, which being now antiquated, were not so much at one; fingers' ends as the statutes were, but he had not shown the particular connexion between the code of forest laws and the action of " B ker against Berkeley." He (Mr. B.) agreed that the forest laws were a nuisance, and was glad that they were repealed, and he also agreed that it was bard that any pri. vate person should lay claim to the rights that the King bad under that abominable code ; but his fiend had raised a, fantastical form of a creature of his own imagination to contend with for the de. fendant laid claim to no such right. The Berkeley hunt extended over a gre ft district ; and as the notice had been served nearly three years before the trespass, the defendant, it was clear, had not during flat period trespassed upon the plaintiff's ginned, or *hewn any disrespect to farmers, withaut whom he was ready to admit that landlords would be a very poor race. The stag was turned out ten miles off, and not having been served with a notice, ran to the plaintiff's ground. where it was pursued by the dogs. and then it took to the farm' yard. The defendant did not go over the grounds, and, far from despising the notice, rode round by tint mad, The object was to save the deer, to hunt is again, for it was never intended to be killed ; and the best riders on these hunts generally get up to the stag and pull the dogs off. They saw that the stag had got into the barn, with several dogs and only two men; the inevitable c'unequenee was the death of the stag, and they rushed on humanely for the purpose of saving the stag. From the information he (Mr. Brougham) had that morning received, the first blow was struck by the plaintiff, and there ought To have been a plea of justification. It was the custom of Gentlemen of the hunt to make compensation for their trespasses, with which the farmers are generally well content, and even think the hunt an advantage to them. The offer of compensation was made by the defendant, but the plaintiff's answer was very insulting. The lan guage used was not to be justified, but the expletives were more likely to have been added by the pLiiitiff's witnesses, who were in the habit of using such language, than by the defendant. who was stated by the witness to make use of the elegant phrase, "if so be." If the witnesses altered the defendant's words on one oecarion, it was only probable they had on others. Holt, the whipper-in, proved that the stag was turned out ten miles from Harrow. Witness was the first be longing to the hunt who went into the plaintiff's yard. The barn door was shut; he asked the plaintiff to let ' him in ? The plaintiff answered, " He would be d—d if he did,—be did not care if the hounds and deer were both killed." When witnessgot into the barn, the doors were Closed upon him immediately. When they were open, he sew the defendant, who said he would pay all damages. The hounds were upon the stag, which lived Osty is quarter of -an hone afterwards. He was worth .50 jkaineas. Witness stw Poulton present a pitchfork at Mr. Nortion's'breist. pidireettlistod of abeot twenty couple; sir dogs got into the' bars. Mr. Canty, auctioneer.--Ssw the defendant endea. *outing to open the barn door ; the plaintiff collared him; the defendant avith4sis whip *York at the plain fiff's Boger', on which . the plaintiff struck him three times violently in the face. The defendant said he Mere -7 wished to sage the Stag, and'begged tb *pin. The plaintiff said whe'd be d—d if he'shotildthe'ilid not care if the wig was killed." Vitifest'saw Pcialton use his fork against a Gentleman. Abe 'defendant offered compensation. James Hitchcock—The star; was.sbut in ihe 'barn t the defendant caiiie up *Witted th'e Pliintitto tetitim, in„ . but lsewosild not. the defendant insisted to go in to save the d6er, and offered to pay ill &Mate. Tiff plaintiff said, " he mould not' him in, fhe stag might be killed." The defendant received llfe firithlowirom Davis, which made his mouth bleed, and'he'defended . himself with his whip. Mr.' White, of Grosvenor place and of Warrenifouse, Uxbridge, saw the defendant at 'the plaintiff's harp door, his mouth was bleeding very •mtreh. 'He slid' that his stag was shut in, and he *begged 'help arid offered coinpens'ation. The conduct of the lit.dislifts people was very Violent. Witness' was Strak and neatly 'knocked down. The defendant's Condtictivas not violen'. 'lt was the custom to save the deer if you could. Mr. Norton—Witness knew both•par ties. He (Saved •tompensation himself. Poultob had a pitchfrvk with which he thrusted at all who tried toget into the barn. 'Warless knew him, and naked "if he"wcieldlet hist 1110, but he Swore at witness.and puthed his fro kagainst him twice, and would haie bort him Very Much, had it not been for his pocket-book. His colt was ton to.pieces. Mr. Hook, of Buratto& Park, also Stated 'that the plaintiff was violent and assaulted the defendant. Mr. Bating, nephew of Sr Tho Mas - Baring, stated that the conduct of the plaintiff and his men was very violent. The defendant and his party were peaceable. Witness was hart in the shoulder with a corn shovel. The ATT:•1111111T GINERIIii, in "reply, Mid, that his friend, having an important case to lay before the 'Jury, had amused himself with making observations upon his opening, but be would again state, that even the King himself had no right, in the pursuit of his apart, to enter into the dwelling-house of the poorest of his subjects. The ancient rights of the Crown wire res;sted and abandoned, and therefore it was an erroneous opinion for Gentlemen to suppnie that they had any such tight; but his friend relied more upon his evi-' dence than he did upon his eloquence, or his dissection of his (the Attorney General's) speech. Ills chief wit ness was the showy auctioneer, who was not put into , his brief; but his evidence was open to suspicion, ' because the defendant, who must have best known the fact, would certainly have pleaded in juatification„ . had Canty's* evidence been correct. If the object were to save the stag,• it was more convenient to close the barn door after the huntsman, and only six dogs ia, than to - let 'in the whole pack; and this was a proof that the plaintiffs conduct was more cool, and that he' took 'a more judicidus course to save the stag than the defendant did. As to the motive of humanity in saving' the stag, whose value was in proportion to the number of cruelties they wished to inflict upon it, his (the At torney General's) feelings were not in accordance with his friend's on that subject. The plaintiff's witnesses were plain men who did not come to give a colouring' to the cause. The defendant did not-enter the fields, but they were his hounds. He had collected the Gentle men, the whipper-in was his servant, he was aiding and abetting, and as in trespass there were no accessories, but all were principals, be was liable for the damage done to the land. Lord TINTERDICII held that the defendant was an swerable for the damage done to the land. The plain tiff had a right to hinder the defendant going into his barn; and the defendant was, by his own witnesses, the original aggressor; for he first struck the plaintiff over his fingers with his whip. and then the plaintiff struck !him. which he was jnstified in doing; Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 1001. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. - BOW-STREWT. Among the night charges at this cake yesterday snortang, a re spectable looking man, nam.d/..yollf,was brought forward byllomp. son, a watchman bdonging to the parldt of St, Marpie-Strand. 6 ' Of what is this penal accisseir said lit R. Brian; twain to . - the watchman. " He refused to move oa, your Worship, when I desired Wm." " Hader what circumstances did he refuse you ?" said the Ma gistrate. " lie was talking in Cathetine;strert, your Worship," answered Thompson, " w h two or three persons, at one o'clock this Tondos, and when I told him to nave On, he refused to stir a step. " Was be talking so loud as to Create a disturbance r asked Mr. Hatt'. "No. year Worship," replied 'Thompson, " I can't say he Will raising a disturbance, but he refused to move on when I oedema him, AM I took him to the watch/sane," " What explanation do you offer r staked Sir McNeil/it MIMI% addressing the defendant. Please your Worship,"he answered, "'1 sopped last night with , two or three friends, with whom I was' perdu* Within a few yards of enrown'house, when this watchman same up, and in a very be latent manner told me to move on. Conceiving that I had damn nothing wrong, tat first paid no attention to this order, and on ite being again repeated, I certainly refused to stir, and enikavoured to explain that I was committing no offence, end was merely ex changing a few parting words with niy friends. Ibis man, however, would not bear my explanation, but insisted on taking me to the watch-house for disobeying his commands. I was, accordingly, brought to the watch-house of St. Mary-k-Strand, where I found the constable of the night, who said he Was whist in his own right. He took the charge against me, and. ordered use into the black hole, where I remained all night, although two respectable house holders of the parish came forward to bail me. Both Sir RICHAaa Bram and Mr. Hato declared, that the charge In the first instance was most unwarrantable, and the con duct of the constable in accepting it, and refuting to take bail, as if the accused was a common fame, rendered hies wholly unfit for Ms °Ace. It was monstrous to suppose that a watchman had any right to prevent persons from talking in the streets at any boor of the M i ght or morning, so long as they conducted themselves peaceably. ^ I wish," said Sir Itscuatio Mall= to the watchman, " you would spew more zeal in putting down the real nuisances of the parish, and then you Would employ yourselves usefully. You an all of you very expert in hunting nut trifling charges, while those dens of infamy, the night houses, the most ahominabk.nuisances that can be imagined. are left unmolested. None of you will in, form against them, although you are-well aware of their goings op; but you have, no doubt, good reasons for your forbearance. 'The defen dant was ordered to be discharged Immediately without the payment of the usual 'billing fee; and the Magistrates, af t er expressing their regret that be should have been confined at all on • charge so unwarrantable, advised high to lay a statement of the case before the swatch connnittee,- for the purpose of procuring the watchman's discharge, and also to eoinmence an action for fabe imprisonment against the night conetalde, on the grounds of his 'fusing to accept batallpil when preffeired for his appearadee in the morning. nittii:4-0411rhiirr. and D. Salmis, M.Llemer. and P. rap were committed in .default of bail, charged with a riot at the &bargees/shy public-house, destroying the tables, glasses, &c. and sumulting Darnley. the eon: stable, who was called on to interfere. 1/. Davis. keeper of a coffee-ahop in totweroes, was reerneided. denied with tbrestiat Clark a drover, from Ms shop, whereby Ms bead, coming in contact With the kirlastosie,' was se dreadfully , injured, that he wAs conveyed to the Hospital in a kopeks" state. WORSHIP-STREET. Driseell, collector at the Cambridge-heath 'Turnpike-gate. Hackney, was charged with misconduct towards Mrs. Warburton . ' and another Lady, who fussed his gate in a chaise on the silt He had first refused them a ticket, stopped the lone. and used dui most scurrilous hrogoese. The -Ladies were released from his fangs, bet he followed, and bad the ya . ce to • mount into the Anise. Mr. ihoucialow sentenseff tlTtla Spay a fine of St. or to walk t'wo month. on the treadmill; • THiligi POLICY- .48/41Panisio Was d;arc;lWlth having tons canons of smite !Jam l's gin in ils possnsiso. -itstoirstes *sated that be saw alp prisoner coming over Tower-kin with a bag go 11 , , .1, 0 .41.. r. caked hint what be badirat,lebtlif Iss i said'bedisi not knew, be t % L i X,ady. pointing to a female, erallifred hint. 01 seeing tilt A tm . ihe ran away anti iikaped. 'lli ate hathefou id k' t3tb four gallons of Holland.. A Gentle sass from •the Cummlasiossle pri of Customs said they did 00t intend to pr ess the charge span * eke arg e soner, said he wes dischd, Mit the lietwievris net retardit Write Beebe, aidliary lbsime ntine l ilere'evertibitted to edly:aes es.cith'emb, add rimobetelkost fee foutteent da iiiitilberderlyi maids. y s, - asi* iniforr-mtit: teiterday a young Ciao, whodtkrtited bins . telfa provincial thcatte. was brought beibie dm Sitting 11 J. l- enalieltal b list &barged With havfittrobbed a mankailledlltio jinn% Davis of tdt watch . and seals. Tbe.complainant staled, that on the ptemding ni(hi he sit jagni an the steps of a door, in .Thomas-aftert, flaikfriars, to smih. ' friend, whom be 'expected to piss that Way. He (ceeed Candidly admitted that be bad b een d r i n ki ng pm e i em a y bet7l-7ews Sock an tutees as toltunseitate bim from reeulletting ' Te s t ii noic stance that transpired relating to the property that had Seen mime (Mtn him. While sitting on the steps, he'said, the peGi eet - • up to him, and supposing that he was asleep, immedi u di ge ee ", fumble about the waistband of his breeches. Hash* gee e e e - a tie r chain, he drew the watch trot of his fob with a sodden left, then ran away. Conspisinant pursued the prisoner, arks o at i d*. merely stopped by a tradesman; and when the for acee sc d w e t of having fobbed hints of his watch, he denied the theft atirstAil subsequently confessed that be dld ' k out of a' hit of lark." VW prisoner then taking the watch out of his coat-pox bet tendoreg itsj the compalnant, who expressed his intention eat (min the mu s e e e into charge, upon width Ise struggled to get away, but was aids,* given into cu.tudy. A witness conairmed that part of the complainant's evidemee e ; specting the watch being found in the prisoner's posurssizatarlti attempt to escape when the former accused him of The prisoner &Aw e d b e had no intention of commkting a tsb. berg ; he perceived the man waf asleep, and in order to have a apt •Of fun." he suddenly jerked tie watch out of his fob to Meese hint, but intended to return It to him again. In the prisoner's possession was found the following te; mike was addressed to hi m by t h e manager of the Woodstocknotheatr It e.— dams the migerabic pittance, as an actor for general hosioess,ke received weekly frees tbsestabildament abewt-ntentienrd.... Theatre, %ode s & . ftra,—l hive a wacincT for general business, Ste. Thy whey% lb. arweek ; 11 this suite, ybu are at liberty to join isort:isety. I aas, Sir, your obedient, H. Jamas'. have a vacancy foe the first singing huskies air, cum The pitted risoner, who is a respectable:looking young man, was f a h . At a Court held at Tenor a, on Friday, for the relief of Insolvent Debtors, Sir Thomas 8. Champneys was, !on application, declated entitled to his discharge. k appeared that arrangements bad been made in 1825 to paythe whole of his creditors, by instalments, is: full: but owing to the failure of the bank of Si r W . S tirling, 'through whose beads the payments were to have bens made the arrangement was ft ustrated, and the only de. taming creditor expressed his determination never to discharge him, unless be,(Sir Thomas) appealed to the Court ! This step, therefore, was adopted ; and in the documents before the Court it appeased, on the one side, that a property to the large amount of 478,800/ sues satisfactorily accounted for ; and that if even all the claimants, just and unjust, legal and equitable, were to be discharged, a balance of from 150,00 W. to 200,0001. 'would remain in fee to the Baronet. The present is, in point of property, believed to be the largest in animal ever before the Court, although the creditors are not by any means numerous. Widley-house, oa Portmlowa Hill, was on Tuesday 'Morning totally consumed by ire. There was no far. there of value on the premises. Monday, the 15th ult. a melancholy accident betel a young woman of the name of Anderson, servant to Mr. Morrison, farmer at Balhaldie, near Dunblane. She had been assisting in carrying her master's cora from the fields, and had been on the top of a cart bead ing sheaves cis it, and was in the act of Fulfil% a rope to fasten the load, when the rope gave way, and she was precipitated to the ground, and, alighting on her head, she was killed on the spot.: _ The coach that arrives is 'Glasgow at nine at night from Hamilton, had, on Friday last, at the lava place, two outside passengers, a male and female ; Musket: the coachman arrived at the east end of Tokress, he discovered that the two had become threee, the female having on the top of the coach been d elivered of a child, which, with the mother, was taken into Mason's Inn, at the east end of Tolcross. Next morning she was so well that she pursued her journey to Glasgow oo foot, with the boy in her lap.—Giangew Chroaide. HARRIED. Be.. Henry Bashfort. Rector of Newtowo,Westmeati, toSuak Deborah, &sewer of the latelksbert Emblem, Eq. arid aka of Woe. 'Lambert. Lc of Etat Arnie, East Cowes, hie of Mitt At Posey, Berks. the Dew J. H. Lear Lamm% wit the Bebop of St. Mark sod ei St. Joke's College, Cambridge, w Elisabeth Lawrie, eldest damehter el the La. P 1 aod Lady Limey Posey. The let that. at Camberwell, fl7fstepher bidoek, bq. Lint. Colonel Commandant of the Bea. East India Commis Enke. aped 4S. At Ludlow, Mahal Jams Tashoo. Lately. Captain Francis Wary, Illegal Navy. At Bleleford, Commander Robert Cans Barton, Royal RM. At Vienna, on the 1111 a ult. at a very advanced age, Fieid Nat. 461 Brady, an illuntione and venerable Irishman. The 2d inst. in South Andiry.streer,John Malys' TAM, only am of Col. Talbot, M.P. for the county of &NM Tb. Ist inst. at his house at Mitcham, Surrey, LinteGeserd Mr Henry Oakes. Beet. is his 7W year. At Coney, Mrs. Anne Maria Teresa Vere, aged 100, oat rit' riving sheer of the late Charles Goenoli.Gent. former!! of Nclwki. Lately, at New Orleans, Mr. Wm Shiplowe, primer, a Bathe 4 England. Also, of yellow fever, Mr. John A. Armstrong, pt ur. aged about t 7 years, a native of Yorkshire, &shod. NEWGATE woo LBADENHALL MARKETS, N 4 T' S " Beef— lts ad to 4s Od I Veal 3* ad to Ss 04 Mutton ........3s Od to 5110 d Pork 4l Od to Is 44 1 PRICES or HAY AND STRAW YESTERDAY. or. James's. wutraciaro nay 41 98 Od to 51 Si Od Hay Si 138 to AOs Od Clone .51 08 Od to A 108 Od Clover 41 10, to A di Id Straw 11108 Od to 11 191 04 Straw 11 tfo to 11 I{lol PER CWT. Nor. S. ssw to Ws to Os cis to 70 61, to als 11103 to 140. laid at 40,0110. Tat:Cti PRICE OF WSW VOCIUTS. Rest sos to 10Ss Rent Sussex Emit • Farnham foe tem to IPILICIt ._ Best Deeming Hides. l3O to 174 Common Ditto l7d to 19d Crop Hides, 35 to 406bs for 'tutting Ditto 45 to 301 be...." .......4 l2d to Hid Calf Skins, 36 to 401bs ...... Ditto 30 to 70Ibs Ditto 70 to Mb@ ... ...... ...... std to 234 Sault Seals, Greenland).— ...... Tanned Hone Hides 144 to 174 Spaniels Hone Hides. . . COAL MAIIKKT, Nor. /a Sips at Market. Ships Sold. puce. 401 34 93e Newcastle 51141 Od to to Sunderland ltd 114 3 Od to at on DIS DA MAILS—. Aall. DM AZ& seg. Dabba 1 0 Prams I 0 Wawa .rd I 0 hamburg 0 1 G .tunas aad Jersey 0 0 Masters 0 0 Lisboa 0 0 Swedes 0 1 Dosiagbadee 0 0 Leeward Islands 0 0 Buenos Ayno 0 1 I Mexico 0 0 Isamu% . II 0 I Brasil 0 0 --------• 4lt; wATIIt at LONDON-BRIDGE TO MOKKOW Morning 16 minutes atter 4 Atterisoue 54 asinutta after •mmisart Prised sad Pub i.bd )y Jam MAYS , ' the K tae StaaVirscs, 'No. 1, Pic.ken-piage, TiosPW'7"