Star. — London, England, 1827-02-02 00:00:00

FASHIONABLE INTELLIOENCL AntilPA& 'The Marquis and Marthionem of Londonderry. at Haldeman In Paik-latie ; Mr. Bairn de Beauvoir, In Giorminor ore; Colonel Nlllner, In Gloomster place; Mr wllfia>s Abdy, pm in Hill-street; Mrs. and Min Vaughan, hi Gloseestor-pike; cork and Mrs. Adair, in Baker-street, Hon. Frederick West, in speak.wiret; Major Aubrey, in Brook street; Colonel French, ham Behar Castle; Colonel M.Kinnon, in Hertford-street, May fair; Mrs. Chaplin, in Welbeek.street ; Mr. D. Browne, in Con. m ost -place ; Major Hope, in Rryanstone-square; Atha Nugent, la pristine/be-square ; Colonel Hollis, in Mortimer-stmt; Mrs. oil Miss Attend, in Lower. Seymour-street ; Mr. and Mrs. *ions, is Lollar Seymour-tater; Mr. and Mrs. Henley, in p ar k place. from Dublin ; :41r Kdward Knatchboll, Bart. in Great G o rr , otter; Captain Peters, In Albemarle-street ; the Marquis el Marchioness of Exeter"; in Hamilton-place; Lord and Lady F. L. Gower, in Albemarle-street; Colonel Pack, at Proton's Heel, St. Janweastreet ; Rev. J. Austin and family, at ditto, g,,m their seat in Kent ; Major Rkketts, at ditto, from a tour; Good Mr A. Barnard, Bart. from a tour. DEP.IIRTURSI L or d Clifton, for cabharis Hail, Kent • Lord Charles Manners, for &k Caste eit Cale ; the Hon. Thomas &emery, from Thomas's Batrl Berpeley•sqoare. fur Brighten; Captain Fitzgerald, (rum * joiery Hotel, Albemarle-attest, for Brighton; Captain jobroy, from the Burlington Hotel, Old Burlington and Cork in" lee a,tosr. - !PALS FASHIONS FOR FEBRUARY. • • '90• • • Peineo-•Diess of black crape over lavender satin ; the ; ma y po l io Amit e plain and moderately high, with a trinuoinkof gmb Italian crape folded laggitadinally a Is Favitiet, and =lined la tin rentre by a loop, with corded gees de Naples edges ; the waist o aa ;on ; o r! *eves, with as antkple cuff of crape, with VW ▪ Awlapaulearz, extending from the wrist upwards. The skirt b ak e/op border ofcrape,..with loops of a black satin semicircular gans, oil% cottied . esiges, arranged foer in a perpendicular row, aed beaded by a coded bowl benison each row, which is about a peter of a yard apart, another bow is introdt:ced ; beneath is a wadded hens. • Eruniso D R Drele of black grade • Aejliti the corsage cut biasand made with a little fulness, rather high in front, and straight ; Armateistell with a doted trisonilog of black Italian crape, narrow ▪ treat and gradually deepening to the shoulder; the . short sleeve is foll,a i nd set in a band round the arm; the long sleeve is large, sad a crape, with a coronet cuff of gra de Nuobe, fistened by a wrought Iron cameo clasp. The skirt is ornamented with an in. 'inisiznire of geode Naples and crape of a fanciful pattern, headed by a narrow toeless of satin, which is repeated between the trim. min, and the skirt is terminated by a wadded hem. The head. dress amests of a very full *rinds of black crape flowers, and a light eripe beer bat, a lubfirrie Row t, With long lappets reaching to , dip atsist Lenge diamond-shaped black brooch Ice the front the „Must; Csynnan east-iron necklace, ear-rings, and bracelets with taws. clasps. nick kid gloves aid chamois shoet—Psom Acta moues iSepaitiry444.. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. • --...1im•-- • BETXING-ROOM, T,A.TTERSA Tee. 1. . .71e WON' pasteyday placed Cllivers as Added Inc favourite, 4to I being la d. in hundred., several timei *vie. We do net Oink, koweserokat the list will continue long in its present state. The Derby betting Was not very brisk ; but we shquldnotice, that Ogees* promises to rise in the odds.. Notbing of any consequesat • w a s done OD the 016% inn Maria pt op half a point. The late Duke . of Tick's racers will be soil} Isere ea Monday next; la 33 Usts. Deane. ..L 4 a tp.l apt . dietiertney (takes) 23 to 1 apt Maincluke 110. 1 apt . Tyler MI to i apt Catherine ; ;114ekt art Espagoolle 30 to 1 apt Amp** 1 0 are WSW /13 to 1 Dpi Torcasio (takes) IP so 1 *Pt Sh9odee Si to . l apt Dahlia (takes) 10 to 1 apt Gaberlunee 40 to I apt Cressida (Wien) 44 to 1 apt Trompeter 40 p 1 apt Garnett's 23 to 1 apt Gustavus (takes) • S to 1 art Maria 14 1 1 1.1 , 4•11 Tatifidge Is to 1 apt Dodges • . %Sas age Trassiadas as Use I arclisosasir 40 to 1 apt Calypso 40 to 1 apt Lonny 3.4 to 1 ,apt &tondo! (takes) 50 to 1 apt easpnew ST. Lassa& ,' Sf Se lsgat allwata " . IS to I apt Moonshine E- 2 ' )81w1 eptiteviewer . . ss to 1 apt Nivalls II Vle l eve enacku , 30 to I apt Jupiter .. 1 '' , 411 or! apt. Popsy 40 to I apt Beggar Hoy Ate 1 alit Matilda • 6. ••••• • 4toS ea (Rivera apt Reviewer (takes) a. ORIAT FEAT. * " COSA' reert.started yesterday s to dries tereptptdgbt smiles In. . two bewp.(karnes).ter 100 sows. It was a Tumoral of die match . imigititishe failed last week, as accostatof *sheen benekingtbree • the trot. lipon this 'Kenya the horse was backed at sett, sod at five to four Just beim stetting. The match was as seepUibed on the Cambridge road, over a dams mile piece of. geoesid as (allows :—'(lee first seven miles were dome in mil Millatle apilß sernds; the 14 miles in two animates anise the beer • tie somaty.lne tisane boor, to mistimes, and ten seconds; a nd the • triode distance In one boar, 59 minutes, and fear seconds. The h perf9emwd the match with muck truth, making two breaks way la the distance. . A Letter received from Cyprus of the 9ih November 1 oars% that the Janissaries in Jerusalem are is open insurrection. the I bowels blockaded, and the forts are is posesesists of the Insurgents. A Boston. Paper, of 'the 7th of January. slates the ti serried defeat of the Brazilian forces by the Beeves Ayes. I troops, aear Neste Video, o the authority of a letter from Santee of the 56th September, and which has run Weigh the newspapers of the South but our advice* from the latter place are to the Sd November, and make no mention of any seek deftest ; It is sea sionAy appareat that the Santos account is unfounded. lite following piihy and moral couplet, embracing awry eccentric metaphor, is attributed to Wstuaat of Wrzweew, she celebrated scholar and founder of Winchester College : Let a gelid con althea be your coestant are, 'Tie light forommer, warns foe wiener wear. Some of the *uses at Hammersmith netted fifty pounds each as the day 4 the funeral of the late Rhombus Coss. nonderin Chief. . • LaW week a roach Was killed whilst swimming in Shields' harborer. These birds are plentiful in Greer:lend, but it is a rare occurreme to see any _of diem south of the Shetland ',bads. Bevil/AMR' 01 MANRIND.—A* Monk invented papowire, a Mb" bombe,. Benedictine artillery, and a Cape. ebb (Father ,lesnw) Stet siggested the introduction of paid spies tha pollee, and isitresa-eseksts—literasy (Seasick PLUTANCH AND Pops—l had Tather,says PLUTARCH,' that there had never been wash a man as Purmacm, than that he should be recorded in history as eignicious, unsteady, irritable, sad raelieloes. Grant me an Moat fame or grant me none. sedans Pon, who, in this Instance, united the beauties of harmony and eamptession.—]ii/. The Assembly at Glasgow on Friday night, for the relief of the distressed operatives in Renfrewahlre, was brilliantly attended. The proceeds amount to about ifs hawked pounds.— This does sot include any d o n a ti o n s that we bean resolved. The i lenewing Gentlemen attended at the door to receive the money and tickets—Ardaibald Campbell of Blythswood, Esq. SL P. Mr. Spoke of Riders& ; Robert Farquharson, Rh. Provost of Paisley; James Ewing. let Robert Webb, Req. 'John Smhh. yet. !pit Among* the etaly we observed Lea Blantyre, Lord Kai berm, the Hem Caknel Douglas, Sir John Maxwell, Mr Jambe Dewart,itt. The company broke up at two it the rawablip CORN IXONANOR, HARK-LANK. Freasmtv Z. Our marine amstionne its a Meted woo, seara 7 eijalnyeityiented this nueulog, sad the fine sans wade were at Midday's prices to seedy canatenece ; indeed, nweedbi to the orioles Othello besS I.#lled to judge, little or no busbies wto be unleaded fee hour um days to cow when the lestastion of Moisten will be known mete the Cons Le;rs. Prices of all description, of Grabs being bet asonsally as on Moodey. SMITHFIELD MARKET, Faavoisar s. Beef is looted 4s. to Ss. 44. par slim Ills mertiolog. stearin So the .ad la the Memel troatios. to 4s. 'per ie. I =l for lee Doles., sad Ss. 4d. to Ss. toil. per souk for worm nets I. Ink &km In Veil, which Is Isnot to Is to Ss. Id. per moos ; sad Poet It 4s. to Se. Id. per . u —Bessts, Slit scups , 1.610; Pip , 110 ; Calves. 114. Heel. per moue, as. to Ss. 441. Mottos, 40. to Ss. id. Yeah is. I•• St. ed. Pork. 4e. se‘je. 24.—Sialt per 14 0 4 . is a " Viewer, 44 Ws. to LM; 9trser..dl 10s. to mil IN. • LAW REPORT. • . ....•••••111,•••.. • ~.: COURT OF CHANCERY, Fss. 1.- DI TSB Katt.l or L WILLMILZT CIVILIIMOL • Such was the anxiety to bear the judgment in this cause, that long before the doors of the Court , were opened, a crowd of persons assembled before them; and on their admission, the Court was filled in such a man- ner that caused the greatest inconvenience to al, who were compelled to stand during the whole time the judgment was delivering, i■ a state of pressure so great as sometimes to cause complaints so audible as to in iterrupt the Lord Chancellor, and without the possibility to many of them of being able to effect a retreat from their state of suffering. Several Counsel front dm other dons came in to hear the judg ment, sow of wham weft obliged to stand the whole thus it was The LORD CRANCRLLOR entered the Court about 20 minutes before eleven, accompanied by Maters Stephens and Dowdeswall. ' He immediately proceeded to give judgment. After adverting to the circumstances under which this cue had come before the Court, he said thy it appeared to him quite clear, that about the 28th May, 1825, Mrs. Wellesley had determined to seek a separation from her husband, by a sentence of the Ecclesiastical Court. Whether that determination was taken before this period had net been ascertained, but that it was then taken, he thought could admit of no doubt. It appeared, from a letter of Mrs. Welles ley's, of the 20th August, 1825, that she had learned from Lord Marlborough, that Mr. Wellesley had &- elated (and the declaration was of considerable import ance) that if he could not get his children by 1a%,. be would have theta by rratagesn. This declaration kola lowed very shortly after a later to . Mr. Pitman, in which Mr. Wellesley had stated, that " a man and his children ought to go to the devil in their own way if he pleased,' and in which he afterwards stated, " that neither GOD nor devil should interpose between him and his children." It would seen► that Mrs. Wellesley had given directions, immediately after that communi cation by Lord Mary borough, to apply to the Cowl of Chancery, and, accordingly, a bill was 6:ed to place the children under the protection of this Court. In consequence of that application. Mr. Wellisley, who had been re.iding abroad, CAMe over to England on the 14th of December, 1825, and presented a petition, in wilich he alleged, " that he had resin ned to England, that he was residing in a suitable mansion (Hall -place, Regent's Palk. his Lordship supposed was meant) that it was I,is intention to remain in England, and praying the Court to make an order on the Misses L•mg to re- store the children to their, father."— Ibis - Petition brought on the painful discussion, which then lasted several.days, and which had been ui.often• before the •Court since. ,Whether it was a discretion properly exercised to heat this case in public, he.would not take upon himself to say. II palates. chose that minters of at delicate,- 0-character. anti of such salt importance, . **aid .be heard in public. ,this Was unquestionably the strongest guard villich.could be thrown round the due exerthe of judicial discretion. Whether it was fit that a jurisdiction, such as the present case implied, should erne. he 'did not know; but this .he would say, than mien pace its oistence was clearlysettjed, Counsel did not act ac.corsing to a right view of their duty, when they sought to disturb the settled course of practice. On the othei hand, the Judge was bound to follow the law, when so settled. omen at the rig of expoiing 'GeV: eyes to the hazard of those it/3014ov; winch the Attorney General had so justly stated. His Lordship this went into a long discus-ion ni the jorisdictioo of this Coon between parent aiid child.. He shewed,•bath from the law of the land,.aod the necessity of the case, that as authority over the actions of a father should exist somewhere. and that power had never been eser.r , need •ins ear other place. than this - Court. Such &power undoubtedly existed is this Court. Lord Hardwicke, in:Powell a. Cleaver, • bad asserted this power in the most distinct and uisequiioc,alterms, and bad declared that '.4e - would see that children ivies educated accord ing to their especiatiens.": It hid 'bent observed .by Mr. Beams, and very justly observed, that this juris diction could not be exercised, unless there was pro perty of the child in Court. If any one would turn his consideration to this pout; for one moment, be must perceive, that without property it was impoisible for this Court to interpose. It did not want jurisdiction, but property. The Court could not take on itself the main tenance and support of all the children in the world, and therefore it appeared to him quite clear that he could only exercise this jurisdiction safely, and with practical good; when it had property. That this had been the doc trine of the Court for a long serves of years no one could deny. la most of the cases of the same sort as that which was then under the consideration of theCourt,it had been enlightened (if he mien use dit term) by the evidence of near relations. In the present instance, however, that ,had not been the case ; there had been Suitor no family evidence brought forward. Such evidence was generally of the greatest importance, because it was mostly given with great pain and reluctance, and therefore the more valuable. Unquestionably a relation could not be called epos to give evidence on a more distressing subject, but 'their evidence was always an assistance to the Coat and highly desirable. Of the truth of this remark M. W. Himself seemed to be perfectly swore, from the teal with which he had sought to procure from his friends a contradiction of the allegation which had come from the ether side, stating that all the members Of his family were desirous that the children should remain in their present custody, and that they should not fall into his hands.— In an affidavit sworn in May, 1826, Mr: Wellesley de. posed that be had wined his utmost endeavours to di:. cover the truth or falsity of the allegation contained ins **concluding paragraph of Mr. Hutchinson's affidavit, asintly, that all his relations were desirous that the children should remain where they then were, and that 1 tech allegation was false." I. another part of 'the same affidavit, Mr. Wellesley stated that he had received a letter from the Duke of Wellington which contradicted' the report, and which was in answer to one written 4, Mr. Wellesley to the Duke, requesting to know if he ' ' bad authorised any person, to use his name as evidence against him in this case. But, before he (the Lord Chancellor) would read the letter from the Duke of Wellington, he would refer to the conduct of Lord Maryburough, as that Nobleman had had to do with the gentian. Mr. Wellesley stated in his affidavit of Jose 8, that Sir Cohn Campbell bad informed him, that Lord and Lady Maryhorough assured Sir. Colin Camp bell, in a conversatiou, that they had taken no pan what ever in the proceedings in opposition to Mr.W.'s claim, and that they were tar from desirous that he should not have the custody of his children. Twat put of Ku W.gi affidavit, however, was Met by 'an affidavit** by Sir C. Campbell, who, it appeared, nant Gmetral in the &my, in which that Gentlensan• states, that be 'having • seen.a lope .ofl an afficlivlt (sworn by Mr: Wellesley, ou.Jusse 8..1828, stating, alai L the deponent had in(otmed. him (Mr ; W.) that Lord and Lady Marlborough' bud assured him, (Sir C. Cr) that Ithey had taken no part in this case, that thiy were far from desiroui that Mr; Wellesley should native the custody of his children, and that they had given diree. tions to contradict the report; he, the deponent, felt ii incumbent op him to deny that he did make such a communication to Mr. Wellesley. He had never any conversation with Lord Maryborough on the subject ; Lady Maryborough did inform the deponent that she had not interfe r ed , and that information the deponent gave to Mr. Wellesley. Then Mr. Wellesley deposed, that the Marquis of Wellesley was against his having the chit. dren taken from under his custody; but what did the fact turn out to be ? On this subject Mr. Lightfoot had made lap affidavit. by which it appeared that that Gentleman, awns as an egent to the Marquis of Wellesley, having alluded to Mr. Wellesley's affiiavit, sworn on the Bth of June, forwarded a copy of that part of the affi davit to Colonel Shaw, togsther with a letter which Colonel Shaw laid before the Marquis of _Wellesley. In reply, the Marquis of Wellesley wrote a letter to the de ponent (Mr. Lightfoot), in which he said, that he had never goren his. opinion on the subject, and he desired to know from what quarter Mr. W. had received his in formation. And he added, that he wished it positively to be understood, that be had never expressed or enter. tained the opinion attributed to him by Mr. W. The letter alio stated, that Mr. Lightfoot was at liberty to produce it Witte the Court, it it was thought such a .step would all the march of jostice. The next affidavit to which he would rerer was that of Lord Maryborough. His L , rdship stated, that his name had been brought before the Couat without his authority ; but as such was the fact, he thought it necessary to state, that soon after the death of Mrs. Wellesley the Misses Long applied to him to accept theoffice of guardian to the children-- they being aaxious to comply with the dying request Of , Mrs.VVellesley, and to continue the children wards of the Court. The Lord Chancellor remarked, that Mrs. Wellesley had expressed such a wish' was beyond a _ . doubt; although at the time when she paned from her husband in France she said that they might re side together again i`l he would quit his abandoned, course...meaning, no doubt, if be would no longer pursue his conuexion with Mrs. Bligh. Although, therefore, such was the dying request of Mrs. Welles ley, still it should nevertheless be remembered that se late as June, 1825, she had expressed her readiness is again live with Mr. Wellesley, and consequently that ,he should live with her children, if he would comply with the condition offered.—Loral Marlborough's aße l davit then went on to state, that the Misses Long res., quested he would allow himself to be appointed yer r 41111., and that be shortly afterwards received a from Mr. Hutchinson, informiqg hies of the proceedings which had been commenced. Thai he,.in consequence, wrote an answer, perfectly approving of citify step . which had been taken by the Misses Long since Mrs. Wellesley's death, and entirely disapproving \ of Mr. Long Wellesley's conduct. That he was .destroot to have nothing to do with Air. Wellesley or his affairs; but. if the• Lord Chancellor those to appoint him sole guardian over the children, he would undertake the loffice, as he felt himself bound to do, however disagree ' able and painful from the cousideratiou that be was their _greadtather. Lord Maryboroulls also stated, that thete.wars •no breach of the family irejth, whom be had communicated whq did not fully canes* with the Mibi4llLoog, in their views with respect to the children, and in reprobation of the conduct of Mr. Wellesley— that is. his own sqn. Lord Maryborough further stated that he afterwards heard of an order made by the Court, which determined bins in refusing so become theguat diark of the children, in order to avoid conflicting surget; l ment,intercourse and misunderstandjog with Mr.Wellie•- ley.The deponent also denied that any such conversaticia bad passed between him and Sir Colin Campbell as bid Men skid so have taken place His Lordship then Toy:, Marked that the letter of the Duke of Wellington waif,, not a little singular, not a little at variance with Mr..Wellesler's statement made in this affidavit. The letter was dated May 19,1828, and in itlhe Duke of Wellington stated, that although Mr. Wellesley had , been in tows from the December previous,. he had beard of bur being there only by report. That he bad', , nothing whatever to say with reference to the proceed- L ings that were going on its Chancery; that he had never rmo an opinion On the subject, and that if more than such a decimation was required from him, be must loci !the affidavits, and become better acquainted with the case. He also added, that he thought he could venture io.say, that a similar feeling was entertained by the rust of the family; but on that subject he would not speak positively, but would content himielf with an swering for himself. His Lordship then remarked, that be bad gone through the whole of the family evidence, as far as be could remember, which had been adduced; and be would ask—did be go too far when he stated, I that nano( the nearest connexions and relatives of Mr. Wellesley would even suggest to the Lord Chancellor that Mr. W. was a fit portion to have the custody of his children? It would be too much perhaps, to say, that I the three leading members of his family, his own father s ' . Lord Maryborough, and his uncles, the Marquis of Wel lesley, and the Duke of Wellington, had said that he ought not tie have such a trust reposed in him, but surely., r evidence, as far as it did go, was of that character. Having thus looked into the part which the family bad, taken in the question—or lather, found, that they hadl taken no part at all, be next came to the history of the proceedings which commenced from the time Mr. L, Wellesley was obliged to go abroad, and went on until the filing of the petition. His Lordship had been most' , anxious to know what were the circumstances of Mr. Wel'esley, for if they had not been materially sliced since he we: compelled to. leave England at the time alluded to, he should have been spared the pang of en tering into the examination it was then his duty to make. The insolvency in the father was undoubtedly a suffi tient ground to deprive him of the custody of his chil dren; but the authority of: that Court would not only protect the property of the children from misuse, when' s the father was insolvent, bat alto compel a father to maintain his children out of his own property, if he had property, according to their just expectattonsand rink in life. No other Court could do what the Court of Chancey I could. Where an eldest son was a ward of the Court, not spay would it provide for his education out of the funds, but also provide for that of his brothers and sisters: it would see that they were suitably brought up, from the supposition that he would be benefiited by those with whom he was to associate Agin,/ properly educated. So was it with respect to Wards of that Court in case of mar. tiage.TheCourt went beyond all otherCoutts. A contrite*, which was valid in common law, was not allowed by' (the moral and religious -_ - If Mr. W.'s circtimstatices were to betaken steadies to the statemenewhich bad been made to upon dwrit,then there was at once in end to the qoestioe as to his solvency—as to his ability so maintain the children according to their just views and expectations in life.* He enn.r, therefore, consider the question *pot .other grounds. It was true the Court could compel thefts** to provide for the childrees maintenance out of blown funds, but he never could permit pecuniary considera tions. if put int the balance. to weigh in the dies* t degree against the importance of a religious and moral education. The Court was not called upon to speak with seferente to the mere act of adultery, whether such act was committed at Napieii. at Albano, at Fioreace, or anywhere else, and if it were, there could be no question that Mrs. Wellesley had granted an act of condonation to Mr. Wellesley. He had no difficulty whatever in saying that habitual drunkenness would be a sufficient ground for the interposition of the Court ; and it was a sufficient ground, on the principle that it incapacitated the father from performing his duty towiids his children. Any other vice having the same effect was consequently squally a ground of the interference of the Court. He had read through the affidavits with the greatest scientists, and, these facts a i speared to him to be quite clear, name ly, that from the time the parties arrived at Paris, aft-r they had left Florence, a system of adultery had been Mr. on between M r . Wellesley and Mrs. Bligh until Mr. Wellesley tame to London in December, and alrs 'from the following March in so disgraceful, so infamous manner, especially to Mrs. Bligh, that he (the Lard 'Chancellor) should deserve to he hunted out of society if he could —no, he would rather forfeit his life than per mit Victoria to be under the custody of a man who had the slightest connezion with such an abandoned woman. Loidship delivered the last part of the sentence with great emphasis, and was much agitated. Strong marks of approbation were evidently about tube indulged in by the public, but they were immediately checked by Officers of theCourt,and his Lordship having received fresh bundle of papers, which he had sent out for, proceeded.) He Abould next allude to the correspondence "which had taken place between Mr. and Mrs. Welles ley, respecting their separation. He alluded particularly to the passages in which Mr. Wellesley expressed it. to be hie determination not to permit the boys to remain* England longer than six months, aid declared thritlie would allow no one to interfere between him anfl his wife., Mrs. Wellesley in her reply to that stated, theist* was resolved to separate herself from a husband who bad already left her; evidently, said his Lordship, alluding to Mr. Weliesley's shameful connexion with Mrs. Bligh. In answer to that letter Mr. Wellesley stated, that be had never treated her in a degrading manger; an l that , when she talked of a separation, she should remember that she had a legal settlecient. and he desired her to take the fullest advantage ofit. The Court remarked. that that • muse apply to the 10,0001. a year pin-money,which, s according to Mr. Hutchinson's affida vit, .a proposition hid been made for putting it into a common pulse.' It also appeared that 50.0001. wis to be charged on the estate on the birth tithe second boy, and that Mfrs. WelleslfY give that to Mr. Wellesley. That Mr s.W.'s pin-satiarty wiiatutleenclarnbered, there Could he no question ; and h' win easy to understand that Mrs.W. should cluipahia of 'Offing called upon to educate the khildren oat of it.,,T4ittetter. went on to 'lecke the propriety Well persons begiligendalel Mrs-vicated an reply, that. as no English lawyers could be produced in Paris, helikhe. /mulct 'swallow Lord Mit yboroogli to interfere, she had resolved on returning to England as soon as possible, to take the necessary advise, and re quested that he woa d name a lawyer to Meet bets She also thanked Mr. Wellesley for an offer he had made her of some 'nary, but declined acceptiourf it; and she concluded by calling on, him not to dr,iNe her to have recourse to the laws of her country foijsrotee tion againet farther insult. Mr. WellMli7 then tent to Mn.W.Me. names of, his Solicitors, and else; a .Fopy of itistricsions tcspecting the course of education irbich was to be adopted, for the children. There Yejis un questionably, in almost all Mr.Welksley's strong injancto t r tem s against lying; and as to the mei% Tricia* of the, with the exception of a few parpnges, they were such as would do credit to any moral man, Among other _things, Mr.W. recommended the cooties:nation of be Doums-day Book, which seemed au usefil con trivance* enough. - Mrs. Wellesley, in answer 4 .pledged herself to .follow the instructions, and expressed her satisfaction at having her children with her. .1a we of Mr. WeUesley's letters he Aemarked tq Mrs. Wellesley, you-know he was given to Jying,. and I allowed him to swear a little, in order that he might, distinguish between a venial fault and,* vice." That was a distinc tion which.his Lordship did .not very well understand, from the example. There was one letter of Mr. Wel lesley's which his Lordship thought it right to notice, but before doing so, ha felt himself bound to correct a most erroneous impression which was abroad, especially out of Court. There • was a general and strong belief that such letter had u killed Mill e Weller ley," whereas the fact was, that she had *IF seen it. The letter alluded to contained a statement of his con duct from the time Mrs. Bligb was sent frOm the family of Mrs. Wellesley while at France. .It stated that ~he bad used his utmost means' to get rid of Mrs. Bligh ; that in a fit of insanity she .had taken poison and endeavoured to destroy. herself ; that as soon as her health permitted her, he had 'persuaded her to leave Florence for Paris, and in the hope that she would find her father (General Paterson) there, he bad delayed Mts. Wellesley's arrival at Paris for iwo or three days; but that on his arrival at Paris he found her (Mrs. Bligb) there, bat not her father. In her *Attila narrative on this subject, Mrs. Wellesley stated that Mrs. Bligb was established at Florence is a s..ite of rooms adjoining her and that site arrived at Paris 'at the same time Mr.Niellesley Mr. Wellesley's state ment went on to speak of Mrs. Bligh's madness--de claring that he left bee in charge of keepers—that she escaped lions their custody, followed him fur days, and that she was in so wretched and dreadful it st to of Meth, that tl.e doctors asserted poscively she could not live a mouth, and that he did not think she could live nine days. It appbared, however, by affidavits, that at the very time Mr. Wellesley stated Mrs. Bligh to have beers in so dreadful a condition, that they lived together and travelled under false names. There could be, no • Nees.—We are Wormed. wt by tba wassawat Medal wo by We Lards*. awl wbdeli was bladed h GO Wagiaarby by Mr. Wel lerAry's lababor, tbat Nr. Wrlisabfb wade w snow ba pow , anne4 of A,OvQ a.yaar five from aglow:arab aia:e*. ~:. 'that Coart,.if it was supposed that the Wire main: k %/Amid Hie .Latikolsip imam& a. ease in which a commotibricklisyst's:daudinkwas abeam awry an infant who was allied to-a snost.l 4 loWornassl7 And was a Ward of that Court. Therefore , it was Wr dent that he (the lard Chancellor) was bound to tect the moral and religious education of the ebih ,; f it t ' I 1 i .., , . 1 . II ft I , 1 ~I • i .• t ! k t ; ) I . t I It I I 4 i t., i 1 i 1 i i 1., , ... I , 1 , 1 I ' l t i 1t i .. 1 . ' ,ll i . '.,. 1 l A ll '