Star. — London, England, 1829-06-27 00:00:00

PARLIAMENTARY PAPER. REPORT OF THE COSISMIONERS ON THE LAW OF REAL PROPERTY. (Continued from our Paper of yesterday.) PRESCRIPTION, Arlo THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. We have now to advert to the subject of prescription and the limitation of actions for the recovery of real property. It might at first sight be considered that, the duration of wrong ought not to give it a sanction, and that the long suffering of injury should be no bar to the obtaining of right when demanded. But human affairs must be conducted on other principles. It is found to be of the greatest importance, to promote peace, by affixing a period to the right of disturbing possession. Experience teaches us, that owing to the perishable nature of all evidence, the truth cannot be ascertained on any contested question of fact after a considerable lapse of time. The temptation to intro duce false evidence grows with the difficulty of detect• ing it ; and, at last, lons possession affords the proof, the most safely to be relied upon, of the right of pro perty. Independently of the question of right. the dis turbance of property after long enjoyment is mis enievous. It is accordingly found both reasonable and useful that enjoyment for a certain period of time against all claimants should be considered conclusive evidence of the title. This period should be so fixed as to give ample opportunity to assert just rights, and yet not to counte nance claims which have been long dormant. It will he found that different kinds of property, as land and advowsons, will require different periods of limitation ; but there seems no reason why there should not be for each kind of property one uniform period of limitation, depending upon the length of adverse enjoyment, and riot upon the form of the remedy selected by the claim ant, or upon any act of the party in possession for the purpose of abridging it. On this subject the law of England is very unsyste matic and very defective. At common law there was no per iod of limitation except a year and a day after a recovery in certain real actions; and the statutes which • have been passed to create or to vary the periods of li mitation have had no regard to uniformity or consis tency, and have laid down rules which do not depend upon the nature of the right to be acquired or defended, but upon a number of technical distinctions, with re ference to which a confused and unprofitable variety of remedies is afforded to the claimant; or upon the secret act of the party in possession. The existing periods of limitation chiefly depend upon 32 Hen. 3, c. 2. 21 Jac. 1. c.. 16, and 4 Hen. 7. c. 24, together with the rules laid down by Courts of Justice respecting legal memory arid presumption. By 32 lien. 8, c. 2, a writ of right on the seisin of an ancestor, to which till then there was no limit, ex cept the reign of Richard the Ist, was confined to sixty years, and a possessory action on the seisin of an an cestor to fifty years; and no real action, droitural or possessory, could be maintained by any persoh on his own seisin after a lapse of dusty years. Foi tendons in reverter or remainder were requited to be sued within fifty. years; and it was enacted, that no avowry or cog eixruce should be made for any rent or service after fitt y years from the sex s in of an aucestor or any other pet sna. The vatute 21 Jac. 1, c. 16, limits the period for all writs of intmedon to twenty years, and generally enacts, th.t no person shall ni.ke entry into any lands but wirfnn twenty years twat alter his right of entry accrued. Tins, with the single exception of fine and nonclaim, was the tit 4 and i• the only limit by statute to a tight of envy, which at cottouou law was never taken away by la; se of time, but only by descent, cast, disconti nualite, or warranty. The statute r.f 52 Hen. 8. c. 2, contains no saving, except as to rights which were in existence when it was passer:; but 21 .lac. 1. c. 16, saves the right of pet sons under disability when their rights accrue. To actions of dower, escheat, waste, and several others in which sei.iii need not be alleged, there is no bar; and there is no period of limitation, fixed either by statute or judicial piesuntption, with respect to the right to lay tithes or advowsons. In some cases, the want of a fixed period of limitation has been supplied by the doubtful doctrine of presumption. Since 9 Geo. 1. c. 16, the rights of the Crown are barred by adverse enjoyment for sixty years; but these is yet no Statute of Limitations for the Church. A presumptive right to incorporeal hereditaments can only be established by proof of enjoyment of them for such a period as will justify a Jury, under the direction of a Judge, to infer that the enjoyment has continued ever since the com mencement of the reign of Richard the Ist. By statute 4 Henry 7. c. 24, a fine with proclama tions is made a bar to all persons having present rights of entry, and not being under any disabilities, if they do ant claim within five years after the proclamations made; to all persons under disabilities, if they do not claim within five years after their disabilities are re moved ; and to all persons not having present rights, if they do riot claim within five years after their rights of entry accrue, unle.s under disabilities, and then within five years after the removal of their disabilities. In many cases, the above statutes do not sufficiently protect possession. In some they restrict too much the right of recovery. Allot .an adveise possession of sixty years, by which the highest ienacdy is bit t ed, undo some ciicuniAances l a rielit of 'oily may still be I nn in roux. On the other ban], a wrongful pussessor ib pwitooted, by going through tea tails Ito ins, wind) arc in reality known only to hinisell and his legal ads isets (although a fiction of law supposes them to he made public) to bar the right ful owner in the short space of six years from the time when the right accrued. We propose that the law should be tendered simple and consistent—by giving an uniform and ceitaiii effect to adverse enjoyment—by giving all persons alleging that they ore unjustly deprived of their estates the same time for enforcing their claims, with a certain indul• gence to claimants under disabilities—and by giving one remedy at law with regard to lands, instead of the existing variety of remedies to which the different periods of limitation are attached. Notwithstanding the anomalies to which we have adverted, the period of twenty years is the limitation which in this country is generally acted upon,and which, being established in some instances by statute, and found to suit the convenience of society, has been made the foundation of legal presumption. and the rule for al fording or refusing equitable relief. We think this should be retained, and with a sew exceptions and quail. .fications made universal. There is likewise one remedy ttf recover possessiou of land. which in practice hat nearly superseded all others. We think that this alone, with some improvements, should be retained and es telided to all cases. Adverse possession of land for a period of twenty years will then be required to be, and will be a bar to all adverse claims; and all the anti quated forms of proceeding which are now occasionally resorted to for the recovery of landed property will give way t o meat. The est dlinent of this period of liMitation. and the of real actions, would tend greatly to diminish litigation, and "Would save the owners of real property from much vexation .and expense to which they are at present exposed, sometimes in defending their possession, and still mote frequently when they attempt alienation. By the proposed alteration the practical efficient remedy for recovering possession would not be impaired. When the ancient remedies were framed, descent was the chief mode of transmit ting real property, and devises, terms of years, and the distinction between legal and equitable estates were nearly unknown. The actions which may now be brought after an adverse possession of twenty years, are almost exclusively applicable to the case of an heir claiming a legal estate by descent, and they require that he should allege and prove a seisin is his ancestor. If a chattel interest in land be claimed, if the claim be under a will or conveyance or entail, an adverse pos session of twenty years is an absolute bar. In Courts of Equity, the rule is generally understood to be esta blished, that after an adverse possession of twenty years, no relief can be given; and when it is considered how generally the existence of mortgages, trusts, and out standing terms prevents any legal remedy, it will be found that this rule is applicable to a very large pro- portion of the land in England. So far the proposal is no innovation ; and surely there ought not to be longer limitation for legal than for equitable estates, both being alike capable of adverse possession, and the claimant having at least as good an opportunity of asserting his right, if the legal estate be in himself, as if it had been vested in a trustee. Although a claim can seldom be set up after twenty years adverse possession, the instances, however rare, in which this occurs, render all titles questionable to the extreme limit ever allowed; and upon the sale and mortgage of land, it is necessary that every tide should be strictly examined for nearly a century, and that evidence should be given of the enjoyment, transfer and devolution of the property during that long period. This is a main cause of the length of abstracts neces sary to be laid before conveyancers, and of the harasiing and expensive injuries to which they gave rise. * Many titles, notwithstanding long enjoyment, are found un marketable ; and if, after tedious delays, the transaction is completed, the law expenses inevitably incurred sometimes amount to no inconsiderable proportion of the value of the property. From the increased fre quency with which real property changes hands in mo dern times, the length of'abstracts is a growing evil, which calls loudly for remedy ; and we think some di , minution of the evil will be produced by shortening and making uniform the period of limitation, although to guard against the fabrication of fee simple titles by per sons in possession under particular estates, it will still be requisite to investigate titles for a greater number of years than the period of limitation which may be prescribed. It seems to us, that with the exception of Dower and 44 Qum Impede (for which perhaps simpler substitutes may be framed) all real actions, and plaints in the na ture of real actions, may be usefully abolished. Instead of those which are framed for injuries done to property, where the right to the property is not directly in goes; tion, actions en the case have long been, and may still continue to be, resorted to. As to those cases for the recovery of possession, in which, at present, ejectment does not lie within the period of twenty years, we think it should be enacted, that whoever has a title to an es tate in possession, shall have a right of entry. notwith• standing any impediment by which, as the law now stands, his right of entry would be barred. Wherever there is a right of action there should be a right of cuts y, arid wherever there is a right of entry there should be a right of action. We also think that continual claim, by which rights of entry may be kept alive beyond the twenty years, should be abolished; and that within that time, the claimant must either redress his wrong by his own act, in availing himself of an opportunity to take peaceable possession, or he must call in the aid of law by commencing his action. We are of opinion that nominal entries on land, which do not change the possession, should be of no avail to the claimant in ex tending the period of limitation. By 4th and sth Anne, c. 16, s. 16, an action may be commenced for the reco very of land, within one year next after making entry upon ir, or claiming it with due solemnity. But an entry without change of possession, is genially a secret act ; great doubts may arise respecting the proof of it in point of fact, and also as to what amounts to such ao. entry in point of law; and it seems better for both parties to require that within the prescribed period, either possession shall be openly taken by the claimant, upon which an action of trespass may immediately be brought against him ; or if he cannot obtain possession, that he should commence an action of ejectment to try the right. Before we ventured to recommend so important a measure as the entire abolition of real actinos, we made diligent inquiry into the practical operation of this sys tem of law; and from the result, we have every reason to think that it would have been beneficial to the com munity if real actions had been abolished flora the time when the modern act of ejectment was devised. Within the last hundred years many real actions have been brought after the remedy by ejectment was barred, but we cannot learn that mole than one or two have suc-_ ceeded. They have generally originated in schemes of unprincipled practitioners of the law, to defraud per sons in a low condition of lite of their substance, under pretence of recovering for theta large estates, to which they had no colour of tide. In many instances ruin has been the consequence to the Jemandants, and in all much vexation and expense have been occasioned to the tenants, who, hoverer groundless the claim may be, by a strange cape ice of the law, arc not allowed any portion of the costs which they have incurred in de. (eating it, when brought fotward in this peculiarly harassing form. We beg leave to advert to the scandal supposed by marry to have been brought upon the administration of l instice, by the decisions of the Judges, for the purpose of discouraging real actions—which these learned per. sons have thought so mischievous, that they might be usefully and properly defeated by any means. if any , blip is made in any of the proceedings from the inatten tion or inexperience of the attorney or counsel, no anteodnsent is allowed, and the claimant appears to fail, run from the badness of his cause, but from the fault of his professional adviser, and from the Court taking upon itself indirectly to defeat a remedy still tolerated by the Legislature. We cannot refrain from likewise mentioning the ad vantage which it may be hoped will arise to the pro fession of the law, and therefore to the public, from thr abolition of real actions, in rendering useless the vast mass of technical learning connected with them. This every diligent student of the common law has hitherto thought it incumbent on him to make himself ac quainted with. While almost all those whom we have consulted have recommended that there should be only one pr clod of Waitaki., and one legal remedy for the recs. very of land, some have suggested that as an equivalent for the abolition of real actions, die right of entry I shearld be extended to thirty years. But after great consideration, we are of opinion that the period of twenty years should be adhered O. As knowledge is diffused, and the administration of justice becomes re gular and pure, the periodi of limitation may be safely abridged. By the statute of 32 Henry VIII. c. 2, the period of limitation was reduced to sixty years from 352, at which it then stood ; and by 21 James I, the period was again reduced, for all practical purposes, to twenty years. In analogy to this express 'mutable li mitation, many presumptions have been established, both in Courts of Law and Equity. with respect to the creation and extinguishment of rights and obligations.' If the period were altered, these presumptions would be disturbed, and much doubt and confusion might be introduced into important branches of law, which rest', on judicial decision. But the shorter period of limitation now in use esta blished by the statute of 4 Henry VII. c. 24, we con sider anomalous, unjust. and mischievous. However it may have been adapted to the times in which it passed, when the quieting ot titles after the long civil wars ot York and Lancaster might require some extraordinary remedy, it is not suited to the present state of society. It proceeds not on the long acquiescence of the claim ant. or those whom he repre•ents, which is the just ground of prescription, but on the act of the party in possession, who. to derive any benefit from it, must be considered as holding an estate to which another is le gally entitled. A convenience, certainly, sometimes is experienced from a bona fide purchaser being enabled, by levying a fine with proclamations, to protect him self against a lawful title which is discovered of er his purchase, and which. though using reasonable dili. gene, he could not have detected earlier. If the prac tice of acquiring a title in this manner could be con. fined to casesof peculiar hardship, the law would be salutary. and might on that ground be justified. but unfortunately it is equally applicable to purposes offraud. From time to time cases occur in which the tightsof the adverse possessor and of the rightful owner, are in an equitable point of view equally balanced, and others in which the adverse possessor has no shadow of right or title against the rightful owner. In the first, the law as it now stands permits the person in possession, through the medium of some legal forms, to turn the ' balance of the scale in his own favour; and in the latter, the person in possession is permitted, through the me dium of the same forms, to commit an absolute fraud. Every law ought to be a fixed positive rule, to be re laxed only ou principles of equity. It is contrary to all principle that a party intetested should have it in his power to relax the law in his own favour. It would be idle to defend the principle upon which the obtaining of a title by fine and nonclains is supported in our books, namely, the publicity given to the transaction by the fine being matter of record, and pr o claimed i n open Court. The supposed publicity is a mere fiction of law. The object of the party levying the floe i. to keep the lawful owner in ignorance, and the proceeding is effectual only when this object is attained. The fic titious recovery in a collusive suit cannot now be the just foundation of any term of prescription. Besides, we are persuaded that the loss of the advan tage of this proceeding by fine and nonclaim will not• be often felt. It can seldom be relied upon for making a marketable title. It is not applicable to copyhold lands, nor to lands held in ancient demesne. nor to , many cases of equitable estates; and it does not afford protection against rights of entry subsequently accru ing. Like other laws at variance with the general feelings of mankind, it has given rise to strained deci sions by courts of Justice; and at present it is some , times difficult to anticipate whether the parties would or would not be held to have had a snfficient estate in the premises to give effect to the fine with proclamations. (To be continued.) THE - EVENLNG STAR. LON DoN. SATURDAY. JUNE 27, 1829 PRICE Of STOCKS AT TWO O'CLOCK. Bank Stock 2111 India Stock . 3 per Cent. Red. 87i I India Bonds 5 per Ct. Cons. Shut Old Annuities si per Cent. 1818. 41000 Racket. Bills 68 • Si per Cent. Red. 97 1500 Ditto 68 9 4 per Ct. New, Sbut aloe and 1200 Ditto6ll 9 4 per Cent. 1826, 104 Commercial Endorsed Script India for Acct. ' . Long Ann. )9i 7-16 Consols foe Acct 88i I %. FoitkitiN FUNDS, TWO O'CLOCK. Brazillanßds.s pet. Spanish Bds S p Ct. . Do. Acct. 56; Do. 510, 91 Dalsosh 11414. 3 pet. 641 i Fr. Rentes,3 p Ct. 79f Portug. lids. Sp C. 42 &change.. 251 50e Do. Mc. 42 DoAcct BRITISH AND FORBIGN SHAIIKS, TWO O'CLOCK. 111/1/11116. PAID. 35 ' 90 $2 $4 Brazilian iiitio National 2S 5 se Mining Company irt Ireland 25 4j 21 United blezican 40 29i 13j j Guardian Fire Ms. 100 10 24j Protector Fire 2O 2 £1 54 Accounts have been itcriied from Lisbon, dated the lith instant, by which u e find that the expedition of Don bliourt., against Terceira, sailed from the Tagus on the 16th, the day before. Letters from San Domingo, of April 21, received this day, inform us that the island wa. in a most wretched condition. Money was scarce—there was no security; and the people were in such a state of abject poverty and misery that they could not afford to cut timber, or bring it down from the country. Mahogany was thus becoming scarce and high priced. Joined with this, the merchants base been called upon to pay tale sums into the Treasury for the payment of the troops and many wealthy people were consequently leaving the Island. Small money had become so scarce that, in paper currency, the ten dollar notes bad fallen to seven dollars. Two days ago, we into rnsed our Readers that four British vessels, and one American,were detained at New Orleans for a contravention of the Customs; and in con firmation of this fact, we are this day enabled to publish the following letter: " Dritiak Cassulate, New Orkin., April 29. " I have to advise you, for the information of shippers and ship. owners trading to this port, that there are at this time no less than Ire veld.; under seizures by t►e Customs for Inattention (at yaw pest) to the Navigation and Revenue Laws of the United States. " GEORGE SALKELD. ... Barclay, FA. Liverpool" Advices from Havre, received last night, state that the price of grain remained high ; but that the prospect of the harvest being tolerably good, a depreciation was confidendy and soon to be expected. Complaints Menu the depressed state of trade are enade not only from Havre, bat from Marseilles and all other parts of Fiance. Demerara Papers are soceired to the 7th May. only matter of importance they contain is an account of the receipts and expenditure of the united colony of Demerara and Essequibo for the last Teat. 'the rev ceipis during that petiod were f. 794,347. 10.4. and the penditin e 1.762.019. 18. 0. Tne number of negroes attached to estates was 58,943, and those belonging to individuals 10,258—being in all 68,601. The produce of the united colony during the year was 84,919,6631b5; • of sugar, 2,807,505 gallons of wine, 2.953,319 gallons of molasses, 5,697,8931b5. of coffee, and 1,918,0961b5. of cotton. With the exception of molasses and cotton, they e is a considerable increase in the produce compared with the preceding year. Recent advices from Madrid state an important di.. covert' to have been made on the frontiers of Spain, near the village of D'Oyarzum. A mine of gold had been found, which, after doe examination by the mine. raingists, would, it was expected. prove very productirre. The Biscayan Chronicle asserts. that the mine Arras known to the Romans, and thit the Carrh4genian. during their incursions in the peninsula under HA N .* NISAL, had obtained gold from it. Already a strong Company, of which a considerable part consisted of the Spaniards recently returned from Mexico, had been formed, with a capital of 2,000,000 of francs, with which it was intended to commence operations, whicJ would tend much to the benefit of the country. .. A brief extract in another page of this Paper, ( t ali- I the Gazelle de France, wil l s h ow that the SULTAN has interposed in the difference Between the Bey of,AL.atastai and tire French, strongly urging the Daly, by Isis Envoy, to give to France all the satisfaction which it moires. There is likely to be truth in this, and that an arrange- Mont is in forwardness; for orders had been given at' ' Toulon to suspend the embarkation of bombs on bo,rd . t he gun-boats. The French Papers, last received, bring us no accounts from the seat of war; but other accounts, both public and private, received last &pi from the Continent, coincide in repteser ting am:noel battle to have been fought between the Russians and Tusks in the vicinity of Stlistsir. As to the amount of losses, the intelligence, as usual, is of the most confused and contradictory character. At present we must content ourselves with the rumour of the day, which is, that General DIUITSCH sequ;red Acttutst PACHA, the Governor of Muria, to capitulate, in order to prevent the effusion at bloodshed; but Actual. was trot so inclined, and sallied out of the garrison, attacked the Russians with the greatest fury, destroyed until of their batteries, and killed a vast number of the be siegers. Upwards of 1,000 wounded; Russians have been conveyed to Wallachia. The number of sick in that Principality is estimated at upwards of 18000. The plague still continues to infest the Ptincipalitiesi... at Bucharest, on the 29th ultimo, 110 houses were infected with the plague. At a late hour this afternoon New York Papers welt delivered at the North and South American Coffee House to the 2d June. The MeFamtile diveraier of the Ist says, it was erroneously stated that in the case of the persons brought to New York, in tbl Danish sloop of war from St. Croix, under a charge of piracy. that the Grand Jury had dismissed this • bill c on the contrary, the Grand Jury came into Court on Saturday morning, with bills against them. —From Cape Hayti, of date the Bth of May, we learn that die Government laid an increased duty of ten per cent. on duties and port charges of American vessel's. This measore is said to be in consequence of Hayden ; vessels not being admitted to an entry in the* United 'States on the same terms as American vessels. Letters from the Havannah of the 24th state that five pirates. were to be executed. CITY. Twig Lvz ecLocc. - - We may state, as for some days past, there is not the least indi cation for busbi es or speculation in the Coosol Market. and Coo. ruin opened at the same price they left ar yesterday, 84 (or the Account. Not &bargain doing in the Foreign Market. The London hoe packet ship, Colombia, Captain Das.asio, from Now Turk, has arrived off Portsmouth ; but the papers and letters have not yet been received in tows. The George Canning has arrived after an amazing quick passage from New South Wales, which she left on the used of March. The papers and letters brought by her have not yet been delivered, but are hourly expected. There are letters in town from Oporto of the 17th bat their contents have not yet transpired. Our correspo nden t says that people are afraid to write from that quarter. CITY. HALF-PAST 01411 O'CLOCK._ The Canal Market has improved since the early pan of the morning, when they were at litte I for the Account, and at pretest may be quoted Mit j. The Foreign Market matinees Inactive, with little or midi* doing. The amount of duties on imports at the port of New York in the year 1827 was 13,217,695 dollars, and in 1826, 15,745,147 dollars. The singular disparity'between the corresponding center of 1828 and 1829, which was, in 1899, 2,668,085 duliars, and is 1828, 4,189,116 dollars, arises from the pending of the late Tail Law in Congress during the spring of last year. By accounts just received from New York, we learn thiltlfr. Ma orsow lays dangerously ill at bis estate in OrangeCoutttt,Yfrglida. The following is an extract of a private letter receited George Canning from New South Wales.— • •-• ' • " I am happy to add that the favourable state of the weinhe seems now set in, and the geneial appearance indicates a fidslif productive season. * The commercial affairs of the &Ansi, biting to unlimited Imports was depressed beyond any former paled; ant much pecuniary d ifficulty was in consequence generally felt." The Duke. and Duchess of GLOUCESTER gave a grand dinner yesterday at Gloucester Hesse, Park-lane, to the Duchess of Cuiassceithe Dwbess of ILszaWinsus, awl a distinguished pant. The Duke of -CLARENCE took an ailing in the Park yesterday ha an epee carriage. The Duke of CIMIRWILMIII. Prince Lsorous, and the bitten! Sono 111Aettaa ' visited • the Bayd Duke and his Duchess yesterday, at their residence in the King's Palace, &. James's. The Duke and Duchess of CuLasuca diljeua. os Thursday to the members of the Royal Family ; Otte which the Rainer family were introduced into the apartment owl sang several of their stational sirs. The Duchess a KINT entertained a numerous party to dinnir, on Wednesday, at her residence in the Woes Palace, d Kensington. The Duke and Duchess of GLOUCLITSR honoured Lady WARM/MOS with their company to dinner on Thursday, at her residence in Albemarle.strset. The Duke of CUMIIRLAND honoured the Earl d SCA sposevou with his company to dinner en Thursday, at ids rid' deuce in Portmamsquare. There was a select party to met his Royal Highness. The Princess AUGUSTA had a select party to dieser on Wednesday, at her residence in the King's Palace, St. James. It having been erroneously repotted in sans /Abe daily journals that Mr. Haana,sileersanith, is Piset4treet, whose house and property were lardy consumed by kn. bad lent dte~ in that dreadful conlagratiou,we are y h ap py bag Ai* ,Y 1 ow t. the statement. which Ins been so' distant friends, and to say that be is with his badly II Pod kw" after the terrible and distressing caleeitr. WINDSOR. Ju hiAJNITT took I palsied by the L illoyat Lodge it end continues h so the Lodge, d five, and rema mostly panes hi the most shady - day during thl upwards of six vied by bis suit MAJZSTT condi entertain a dist Second Ascot E Yesterday morn ant et Royal Ha liroet the baitacks they bad a Geld da! meet the kid opei Tollevriss :novenae' edema. eeentennt viand, formed lira advaeced, half squ vowed, columns C 1 colonies of squadk &e. The whole to the troops returnel Me band of the re' omieebcd along the Three Troops of SWAM in the C* 34 liberpoole'lldder quarters wen Not atishboerhood of troops bad data& ever three troopkr turbet.—.Pablin P • /SOK 1 Teesday t►e Se doted ; by the late Sir Joan Brno, C pitaliafter which lip& per diem ad Comm I Limerick. Westmeath, and 1 The Jelin Craig at Partunotith ant fur the 58th. linkers wimps' Isetaidt. sath ; Elm Wall and Ensign Accounts recer quarter division of lord Cochrane tr The head quart Land, arrived at I paisage of three it Ilte.force at Belga 'The 79th firma for Kingston, Up; replace them Iron The depot of tl • Templetnore. The 19th depot The company a array at Carrick a on Monday, hawk regiment. The Military fi Gaols are not to b Thursday, the a tack *as es hibitet heroes of the pita tinguished itself at in.punsbers precet fog the terrible ea rams, marched Ira en the Cakedral, tikenny man, GI Urigade taelsol. Colonel h L to a aseptuous di miattigetete supply a • owning. a were won." MMUS AIIIIIIND 1 Deai. Jame 26, Stiehl, from Mau jun. is passing for Cowes, Jung SI 41111100111, J from bleit South PORTSMOUTH , .1 Ida; Delano, from PLYMOUTH Jt . Waterloo. Beare Fiamoltni Jc from Gallipoli; from Gallipoli; Melville packet. the 'Gib. and M Cadiz lath June. and Arab. Berke WIITSIOUTII, it Houraimn, Ju LIWEITOOL, Jul Facile, M•Gowa bon t and Belem Thampi here ; alto the 611 FROM THE N May 25.—Art 28th.— Arrives Londonderry, in Juts 1. —Agri the Ist of May to Liverpool, for Cl 45.12. die British The British AI in tar. 44. long. 5. Qiwbet. Brig Apnea, I front lainsgate. British brig F.B Ship Andrew S Da...pm Agnes huh brig Crc ;kidsh ship Ro 21st May. British schorso Bremen, arrived Brig Ottrr, Ira Ship Heruitie, on the 27th of hl STIDNIY, Ntw eels will sail in ti the Midas and Mary, for Loads Prince Lao turn his seat at At eleven o Lis Majesty's Ma the Privy Course Lord President, don. H. Mot. in the afternoon causes, both of ti v. Jeoner, the of eluded, their Lot The Earl of an interview witl the Treasury. Ti A young as 11,1 4), nadir a ws finch logs, a lane bonnet, !it It 't stole's' a Totem Green; sad the gene before • MI clothes hi Which Bight.