Star. — London, England, 1820-04-06 00:00:00

• - ASSIZES.- LANCASTER. TRIAL OF KNIGHT, DEWHURST, AND OTHER& SZOOND RAT-lIIONDAY, APRIL 3. The Court met this morning between nine and ten o'clock ; and the names of the Jurors having been called over, Mr. WILLIAMS observed to the Court, that he feared he had on Saturday spoken with too much diffidence on the law as to the right of the people to carry arms in self-defence. He now stated broadly, that the people had the right, and it was only the ill use of them that could constitute a crime. He feared that it might be looked upon as an abandonment of duty, that he had not urged this matter more strongly. Mr. Justice BAYLEY...4 cannot consider that per sons have a right to go armed in that way in con templation of an attack. The examination of witnesses for the defence was now proceeded in. . John Cross, examined by Mr. Wir.mtssa.--Has known Flet cher from a child. Sew him three or four weeks after the Man chester Meeting, and he then asked the witness if he bad his pike ready, for it would soon be wanted? Mr. Justice BALTLEY.—I do not think this is admissible, but I will take a note of it, and wish you to state the nature of the evidence. _ _ . Wtr.t.tasts.—We propose to thew, by this witness, that Fetcher was in the habit of inciting and soliciting people to arm tlirmsriv.s; and, therefore, those who attilleed the Meeting might have been induced to do so at his instigation, instead of that of the defendants, as charged by the indictment. After some observations from the prosecutor's Counsel, John Cross was called again.—Fletcher told me the pikes were preparing. I said I did not believe there was such a. thing. lie told me he could take me to where there were plenty. ' James Chadwick was called, as stated by Mr. Courstair, to prove violent expressions used by Fletcher against the Govern- mein ; but Mr. Justice BAYLEY thought it was not admissible evidence. _ _ Mr. W. Lees, watchmaker, was at the place of Meeting be fore the people arrived. Saw them come in with music and colours, not different from Orange Meetings. Saw no arms. The Meeting was conducted with peace and order. Heard an alarm after knight arrived, but it was soon peaceable. There were no seditious or inflammatory expressions used by knight, hut he exhorted them to peace, anti rather to accept an insult than to offer' one. Cross-examined by Mr. RAINF..—Ue had the llaslingdon flag at his house for three or four days, with the inscription, " Tlidu wast covered with anger, and persecuted us. Thou hast slain, and bath not pitied us. Cursed he their anger, for it was fierce; aml their wrath, for it was criel." Ilawarth, was at the Hui-Idr)- Meeting; went about one o'clock, Lefore the large body came. in. They came in civilly. Knight arrive. %Vent within about ten yards of , the bust it-gs ; heard al.trni of Military, once before Knight came, and once after. Did not see any pikes or pistols en either occasion. Coild hear distinctly all that was said; nothing was said about overthrowing tht: 6 •ernment, or all rising in one day. 'When the secoml alarm was givaa, ir. Knight put out his band, and said,' B still ; I can see the danger befere you—be peaceable, a•td keep good order." This was repeatedly said, and he told them to ° rto home peaceably, shortly before he came from the hustings. Everytlibig was peaceable, except when the report was made of the &Mk/ s. Cross-examined by Mr. Scrjeant CROSS.—T. am a weaver at 14eslitigdon. Dit.t.not go with fees. There mitht be about 200, ar.l only one tag. I dia.not beton; to them. They might nteet at a rood to arrarge the r*lteting. I went across the country; and got to the btfore the people arrived. Did not see items on the flans. - James Onnrod Atkir,:on.—l an a shoemaker. - I got to the Meeting about one o'clocl, and stopped until it was over; was near the hustings, and could hear evcri word the speakers said. I did not hear an expression about overthrowing the Govern ment. There wa: sornetl,'.ng said about their rising in one day to petition the Frince Regent about a law that wens to issue.— The speakers wished the people to be peaceable, and not to give °M ice to any one. This was given at the beginning and at the end of the business. Crossexamined by 'Mr. RAXYF.—I dad not remember what was en the flag, or whether there was " Order, Love, and Unity." " The King and his Throne shall be established." From Sidmouth's bloody black coats, and from the Yeo manry Cavalry at Manchester: from all oppressors to the poor aid needy." I will swear I did not know or believe there was aoy thing or the sort: T do not know that there was on others " egret Charts," " Heery Hunt, Esq." To qua e ions from Mr. Justice Reveze.—l was there when. the ?tarn , of the soldiers was given before Knight came. It did net ioduce ire to move away; I could see a great part of the p_ rile, and t'eese who were in front of the beatings. I did not se!', any pike:, or pistols, or staves. I never saw a pike in my life; ty had ricks like walking.sticks ; I think •if any pikes had been preducesi near the hustings, I should have seen them, and nose were produced in my sight ; I heard a single report of a pistol as I was going away ; it appeared to be at a distance from the crowd; /did nut see the smoke. Vim. Montgomery.—l was at the Meeting before Mr. Knight arrived, and stopped until it was oeer. There was a rue, end I was carried back nine or ten yard:. When the seeakirg was going on, I was near enough to hear what was said. Nething was seid about overthrowing the Government. The speakers frequently desired them to be quiet, and to give no offence to any one: and just before the Meeting broke up Mr. Enieht desired th:m to be peaceable and quiet, and in no sense of the word to give ofemee. 'nitre Wl3 no riot or offence given to any ore. Cross-examined.—Ore Petrick Hughes who was hanged was • appreherded at my house : he wa i l working for rue at my loorr.: be concealed himself in toy cellar. Remembers'* Annual Par. U:eversal Suiirag', and Election by Ballot." I was charged with embezzlement, but got rid of it at the Quarter Seaaiens. . 'r. Justice Darter qt Motioned the witness, and he said he did not hear anything about riving or nutting all in ore day. Robert llowarth.—l am a weaver. was at the Sleeting at lieveraharn Eaves, and went veld: the sactesion, and stopped tel the Meeting was over, and was about 15 yards or from that to 30. Heard the speeches and Resolutions: nothing about overthrowing the Government. They said they wished the peo ple to be peaceable and quiet, and in good order, and not to mo- Lee no one in the least. No disturbance except the alarms. Cruss-ezenitneth—No pike-handles were found at my pre mises, but a %haft belengieg to a loom.. 'I here was on a flag, Open dr: mouth and judge rightiously, and plead the.cause of the poor and needy." " Magna Charts, Bill of Rights,! Henry Hunt, Esq. Liberty or Death." On another, " No torn Laws." On the first flag was, " Black Moss Reformers." " Thou shalt do no murder." " Universal Suftlag•o" " An neal Parliaments." " Vote by Ballot." I don't know what any of these arc. Saw a figure of a woman holding a child, but whether it was witkout a head I cannot tell. In answer to Mr. Justice Beyezri—The liege were furled up before Knight came. Did not hear anything about a rising or Dleeting all en one day. Saw no sticks, or pikes, or pistols. I was carried off five or six yartlkby the people on the first alarm. James Pollard, weaver, near Colne.—Went to the Meeting with the procession; was at backside of hustbies ; afterwards changed my situation to the front, and was five or six yard* off. Could hear what was said; no word about overthrowing the Govern ment. The speakers exhorted the people to be peaceable, and to beware of spies, who would endeavuur to alarm the people, and create disturbance. This was frequently done; and betore they separated they . evere advised to go home peaceably. • Crosa-examinerthlright set the words " No Tyranny," and also the name of !lent. . Mr. Justice Baxhay.—l remember that it was said, if the habeas Corpus Act was suspended, the. people were all to meet on one day throughout the kingdom to send a petition to the Prince Regent, that the Habeas Corpus suspension might sot pass into a law. William Dyson, of Rough Leigh, got to the ground about otde o'clock ; went alien his calr4dren, who had cheated him, to send them home. Heard Mr. .Knight MU the people to keep race and quietness. Cress-examined.—thews Witham; has been there to read newspapers. Never wentwith Witham for the Rough Leigh flag. Here the case for the defendants closed. Mr. RAINS (in the absence of -Mr. Scarlett) now ros e to repll , . The prehelit case, • he .9bearved, was one of as grave and serious a ratwe ak he had ever met in the course of his professio&itareer—one; of which, should the Jury be induced, by the specious arguments of Counsel on the other side, to acquit the defendants, they would soon findethe standard, not .only of sedition, but of rebellion, ria:wed in every part of the kingdom, and from the government of the laws we should be reduced to a state worse than bar barism. The Jury bad -heard from the Learned Counsel, on the other side, an invective against the immense length of the present indictment, which he had termed unblushing ; but that Learned Gentle man well knew that such a length was unavoidable, from the nature of the charge, and must be so in all such cases. He (Mr. Williams) had also complained, that some of the prisoners had first been accused of High Treason ; but that now the prosecutors had shifted their grounds. It had been so, and certainly its first appearance was that of High Treason. In its present shape, it came as near to it as possible ; and if some of the words proved to have been used had been followed by any overt act, the case would have assumed the character of High Treason. However, the case of High Treason was properly given up, and he now stated to the Jury, that the proseLutorJ also gave up the charge of Conspiracy, which was in the indictment, though he was certain that abundaut. evidence had been laid before the Learned Counsel who drew the indictment, to warrant his drawing it as he had done. The points"to which the Jury would have to direct their attention were, the illegality of the Meeting, and the conduct of the defendants. It had been said, on the part of the defendants, that numbers alone did not render a Meeting illegal. He would - net take that proposition without some quali fication, because Meetings, even for the most lawful purpose, might be in such numbers as to have a ten dency to riot, and to create alarm. But not only, according to the Learned Counsel for the defendants, might Meetings assemble in any numbers, but they might also go armed. It might, indeed, be true, as laid down by Mr. Justice Blackstone, that persons had a right to have arms for self-defence ; but he denied that such a right was anywhere mentioned as that of g:ing to Public Meetings armed, or that any such right existed. The Learned Counsel then proceede4 to comment upon the evidence as it af fected each of the defendants ; and, in the conclusion, he admitted that there was not sufficient evidence as against the defendants Wade and Astin. Ile should also observe, that the only thing which had been proved against Adamson was the fact of his having been on the hustings with a Cap of Liberty. Mr. Justice BAYLEY, at about four o'clock, began to sum up to the Jury. He commenced by entreat ing them to dismiss from their minds any , feeling of prejudice which they might have imbibed on the subject of the present prosecution, and to let their verdict- rest upon the evidence which was before them, and upon that alone. Such should ever be the conduct of a British Jury; and if, with those feelings, the defendants should be acquitted, they would admit they had a fair trial; if, on the other hand, they should be convicted, they must feel that it was only from the force of evidence. The two charges to which the Jury should confine their at tention were—first, that the defendants and others had unlawfully assembled for the purpose of exciting disaffection, &c.—and the second was, that they had assembled to the common terror and alarm of his Majesty's liege subjects. His Lordship then pro ceeded to lay down the la* upon both these points, nearly in the same terms as those he used in address ing the Jury at the recent trials in York. To con stitute an unlawful assembly, it was not necessary that any riot.or disturbance should take place. The mere assembling with offensive weapons was, in some instances, held to constitute an unlawful Meet ing. Any large body of persons coming together, under such circumstances as to excite terror and alarm, would be an unlawful assembly. Coming armed to.remedy a common grievance, would also be illegal. In looking at the present Meeting, the Jury might be of Opinion that the object of the great body assembled was lawful, and their intention innocent; but if there were any amongst them who %V ishcd.to give a wrong turn to those intentions, the Meeting, as far as they were concerned, would be unlawful, and they %•ottld be guilty, though allthe others might be innocent. It some persons 'went aimed to the Meeting, in the expectatig-n of attack, and determined to make resistance, they would Le acting illegally ; and vrey person who saw them there, and remained afterwards, would also be acting ille gally. In the same manner, if any persons went to the Meeting, not knowing that there were to be any' inflammatory speeches, or flags with inflammatory inscriptions, or any persons armed, and that they afterwards saw such flags and arms, end heard such speeches, and yet continued at the Meeting; they . would also be acting illegally. With respect to the, terror which the - Meeting was calculated to excite, he thought it would be one of immediate danger; but if the Jury should think the danger from the Meeting was remote, or only of a future rising, they would give a special verdict to that effect; as his mind was not perfectly made up as to that being, the kind of tenor which would render the Meeting . illegal. He had no hesitation in saying, that a Meet ling on the subject of bringing persons who had com mitted crimes to justice, was a legal one, but, sitting there, fie did not judicially know who those Were who had committed crimes such as had been alluded to. Until he had judicial knowledge of the pro ceedings at the Manchester Meeting he-could give no opinion on it. They might be perfectly innocent who caused its dispersion, or they might be guilty.: He could not now decide; but, if ever the subject tame judicially before him, he should be prepared i to give his opinion on it. He agreed in the opi nion, that numbers alone did not render a Meet ing illegal ; there should be some circumstances attending their assembling that were calculated to inspire terror, before ft could be so deemed.— If he saw a large assembly,. consisting of men only, be might perhaps apprehend danger, but he could pot have the same feeling if it were mixed of men, women, and children. Re could not concur with the Learned Counsel for the defendants in the state ment, that people had a tight to arm as he bail de scribed. He admitted that any man might have arms suitable to his rank, but pikes were not this descriptiOn; and in point of law,' . he had no diffi culty in saying, that the people had no right.to carry arms to a Ilublic Meeting ! because thT might con template being attacked: Such carryinof arms was o. At. • 1.4. to excite terror, and, was therefore illegal. H'~ Lordship then proceeded toga thfotie the evidence, commenting as -he went on ; and, in the course of his ] Observations,. took occasion to r emark, that he had' asked one of the witnesses whether any, and what portion of this Meeting was composed of women and children, in .order to form a judgment as to the peaceable intentions of the parties ; and he added, that in a recent investigation which had taken place before him, respecting a large assembly of a similar nature, it appeared that a great portion, ar least one-eighth part of it, was composed of women and children; which circumstance had made a great im pression on his mind. that no mischief was contem plated or to be apprehended on that day. In con clusion, his Lordship said, they were first to consi der whether the 'meeting was calculated to excite terror, from the people being furnished with sticks and staves, considering that the women were habited in mourning, and that the staves were mounted with crape; and if they were of opinion that terror was excited, then all the people who saw these things, and still remained, were guilty of being present at an unlawful meeting, and especially those who were' active partisans. If, however, they were of opinion that these appearances were ;Jot calculated to excite alarm, then they were to consider whether the people having pistols and pikes were not likely to excite terror, and, if so, then their Verdict should apply to such of the defendants as saw them, and upon this point the evidence was much stronger against Dew burst, and Broadhurst, than any of the other de fendants. They were next to 'consider whether the inscriptions and drawing's on the flags were calcu lated to excite sedition and disaffection ; and, if so, Dewhurst and BroadhurSt saw them, and afterwards remained to take apart in the proceedings, then they were guilty. Lastly, they were to consider, whether they had an accurate account of the speeches and re solutions given to them by the witnesses for the pro secution ; and if they had, and they thouOrt them calculated to excite disaffection in his Majesty's sub jects, then those who uttered them, or remained to sanction them by holding up their hands, are guilty; but he begged to say, that if the Jury . entertained any doubt on either of these points, or as to the par ticipation of the defendants, then it would be their. duty to. acquit the defendants. The Jury retired, and, after consulting together for about twenty minutes, returned with a verdict of—Guilt) against all the prisoners, except those two (Wade and Asten) as to whom the prosecution had been given up. It was remarked that the verdict was a general one; though Mr. Raine, in his reply, had given up the counts which referred to the charge of conspiracy. It was, however, understood in Court as not apply ing to that charge. Mr. Justice BAYLAY was about to pass sentence, when Knight requested to be allowed to say a few words in mitigation. His Lordship said, he would give him and the other defendants till to-morrow morning to prepare any affidavits, or any statements for that purpose. ACQUITTAL OF RICHARD OWEN. Richard Owen was next put to the bar, charged with wilful and corrupt perjury, in having sworn at the New Bailey, in August last, that be saw Moor house on the hustings in company with Mr. Hunt, on the day of the Meeting on the 16th. He was given in charge to the Jury; and Mr. C. Pearson, and the other witnesses on the back of the indict ment, being called on, but not appearing to give evidence, the Judge directed an acquittal. 1(e was of course discharged.—The Court then adjourned. MONMOUTH, MARCH 29. THE RING V. THE REV. THOMAS PROSSER. This was an information, by way of quo warranto, chariging, that, upon the 27th July, 1819, the defend ant did, without legal warrant, exercise the office of -Mayor of Monmouth. Mr. Juivis addressed the Jury on the part of the Crown. Although the pleadings, the Learned Coun sel said, had run into length (there were 97 issues), the question would be a short one. The Jury, were simply called upon to decide whether the Mayor of Monmouth should be elected by the Common council from among themselVes, according to an alleged itn memorial'custoni, which could not be made out, and according to an asserted by-law, which was not extant ; or whether the Mayor should be elected by the resident Burgesses of the town, from their body at large, according to the Charter of Edward VI. which, in opposition to the Cliarer of James I. he should contend was the governing Charter of the Corporation. Mr. Hewlett, secondary of the Court of Common Pleas, produced a variety of ancient documents. Mr. Thomas Phillips, Town Clerk of Monmouth, was examined at very great length. This witness produced, from the chest of the Corporation, the re cords of the Hundred Court, containing the , entries of the Elections of Mayors, some of them as early as Henry VIII. and the records of the proceedings of the Court of Common Council ; and; uponinspection of those books, it appeared that, froin the year 1694 to the:present time, the mode of election supposed to have been set forth by the by-law had been adhered to, except in those particular instances dwelt 'upon by the • Counsel for the Crown. The witness then proceeded to describe the scene which took place on the 29ih of July, at the election of Mr. Prosser. Upon the 29th July, he said, the Common Council came into the Hall ; and, the nomination of Mr. Prosser being read, the Crier proceeded to make proclama tion. The.proclamation called upon any person who would obect to Mr. Prosser to come forwa r d, an d his poll s hould be received. Mr. Thonias Philpott then did come forward, and said, " I claim the right, as a BUrgess, to put a Bur gess in nomination as Mayor." . Mr. Burgess Bryan, also a Burgess, added- 6 c I protest against the .introduction of anything from the Common Council." Mr. Philpott then nominated as Mayor Mr. C. Heath, of Monmouth ) Burgess and printer ; and a chew of hands, for and against Mr. Heath, was called for. The Recorder interfered, and refused to permit the name of Mr. Heath to . be put to the vote ; at the same time requesting witness to take the votes of such Burgesses present as chose to vote for Mr. Prosser. A Burgess, named Harris, then came up, and asked the Recorder, what he would do if the Burgesses voted against Mr. i'rosser, and re jected him? Mr. Bathurst answered, that the Com mon Council. would nominate some one else. Harris then asketl,what would be done in case all the Com cnori Council should berejected ? To which the Re- . , „ti,~_ .t corder replied, that as should be given the occasion occurred. The votes for Mr. Pres.tr were then takep-20 for him, and hone agaiust him. Mr. Tworrr 9rt addressed the Jury oii die the defendant. • Mr. Justice Ilictitteesos summed up at great length. 'The Learned Judge went through the whole of the documentary evidence which had been adduced. The immemorial custom, his Lordshir said, clearly had not been sustained. The Chattier of Edward VI. certainly did not preset ibe that mode cif election by which Mr. Prosser, the defendant, 114 d been chosen; but, not w ithstanding that the right was, by that Charter, given to the Burgesses at large, it was competent to the whole body assembled toge , Cher to make a by-law for the election of their corpe-: 'rate officers. The question. for the Jury would be; whether such a constant usage had been sliewn the defendant as would induce them to presume enck such a by-law had existed : dev ix.ions from that usage had been proved ; but, upon the whole, (the Learned Judge) was of opinion, t!:at there been sufficient usage established- to Darr :1•1 presutning the existence of such a The Jury retired for about half an hour and, at the expiration of that time, returned a ver,lic: the Crown. .~ . WARWICK. BREACH OF PROMISE OF A! C!r-ge, BAXTER V. - BOLICIIER, was to have been tried at V:Z.T. wick Assizes, in which the plaintiff sought co riper.. sation for a breach of promise of marriage; Set it was settled by compromise, wlthera going into Court —the friends of the Lady, who was recently married to Mr. BOUCHER, jun. of CIIEItE4II2I, agxceing to pay the disappninted suitor EMI and all costs. Thomas Afusgrove, convicted at the Assizes for Devonshire, of sheep-stealing, upon the evidence ei two of his own daughters, the one fourteen and t!.e other seventeen years of age, was executed on ?11.•.n -day last, at Exeter. He was an ont.pensiouer ci Chelsea Hospital, and had served his country in South America, and in the Peniosula, and belayed extremely well in several engagements. Tl'e un happy man met his fate with becoming fortitil2.c. • Thursday last, John Pannell, who was °cozy cte'.l at the last Kent Assizec, for committing a l",: glary at Mr. Tomkin's, at Keinsing, underwent the ful sentence of the law at Penenden.heath. :yin e condemnation, his conduct has been 't; uly ticvottt i and at the.place of execution he evinced much re-t;• teuce. About twelve o'clock he ascended the plat. form, when the executioner (who came from New. gate), adjusted the fatal coed, and in a few minutes lie was launched into eternity. He died very hard, and his body appeared convulsed for some minutes. At an early hour yesterday morning, some thieves; by means of forcing open one of the winlows of Step ney Chapel, entered it, and stripped the put t it of the black cloth. They forced open a cupboard in the Vestry, and rifled it of fourteen bottles of wine, a quantity of candles, a pair of silver candlesticks, the communion-cloth, napkins, &c. all of which they car tied off, together with a large looking-glass. About five o'clock the same morning, as the wlatchman was going his rounds, in .the . Commercial-road, he sa' two men in sailor's apparel coming towardshim one of them carried a square box on his head, and the other a looking-glass and a pair of candlestick ll ' under his arm. Ile stopped the maxi who carriell the box , but the other effected his e'cap e , leaving he. hind him the glass,. and carrying-off the candlesticks. The man and the box were taken to ShidWell OEue yesterday, w!lere it was found to contain the w‘ir candles, and cloth, which, together with the box led looking-glass, were identified by Mr. Davis, the Cha pel-keeper. . The, prisoner gave his name ?heeds kiarley.—He was fully committed. Sunday evening, last, as a young Lady of the name of Grove, in Crocket-row, Edgeware-road, was ad-. justing part of her head-dress at the chimney-Filass,. her clothes caught free and she was momentarily in one blaze. A female companion, who was close to her, was too much overcome to assist her, and she . ran into the street for assistance, whilst the most part of Miss Grove's dress was reduced to tinder. Imme diate medical aid was had; but little hopes are enter- Ltained of hei recovery. The front, hair .was even. burned from her head, and she lies in much agony. Friday morning, a fire broke out in the house of Mr. Thomas Good*in, watch-manufacturer, No. /, Angel-court, facing St. Sepulchre's Church, Snow hill, which threatened destruction to the house, and greatly alarmed the family, who, in their consterna tion, began to remove some of the property for safety: however, the fire was happily got under, without doing any material damage; but in the con fusion necessarily caused on the occaiidn, some vil lain found opportunity to steal a large morocco case, containing six .very valuable gold watches, a great quantity of. jewellery, several gold neck and watch chains, fourteen ounces of pure gold, and other costly articles, td a large amount. A curious and valuable disco Very took place on the morning of Tuesday se'nnight, in Cannon's Marsh , field, Bristol. A labourer employed in cleansing a ditch, observed some shining. pieces of metal, and on inspecting them they proved to be guineas, hall guineas, and seven shilling pieces, of 1805-6-7. hav ing picked up several, he hastened home with them' to his wife, who, elated with joy, and being unable to keep a secret; boasted to her acquaintance of her husband's good fortune. The news of the - gold mite soon spread, and numbers have since been exploring the ground, and scrambling in the mud and filth for the treasure. It may be conjectured that the deposit. was made by some thief, who had been prevented by the laws of his country from enjoying his ill-g&t ten plunder. • Friday, at 13rigittlingwa, gas;;,the *fetal Lieut. G. Beane. ley, it.N. of a daughter. DIED. Friday, at Seaford, aged 81, Elizabethi wife of the Rev Thomas Williams. (M Good Friday, Anne Dudley, third daughter of the Rev, W. Wodsworth, Rector of St. Peter, Sandwich. Saturday, at the house of Wilkart Wilberforce, Faq. M.P. Kensinliton Gore, the Very Rev. Isaac Milner, D. aF. R.S. Dean of Carlisle, President of Queen's College, Cambridge, and Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in that University. Saturday, Caroline, only daughter of the Dean of Rochester. HIGH-WATER at LO Mcming After:een - - - DON BRIUGE TC/41(iR ROW. 41 tniautes aftdr 8 - 19 - - 9 . d and publisheility LivaL Kix?, Pickett: Tcmpk-Das !r Cr at !ft • DE it e, :y it e r, r- it rt d :f Y i- t- 5 4 "•• .e ,e a r- tt lI ; a s. :e 5.. 4 - a a Ir a •'t , • re P. A • _.ar.7 3 ~~ . ~rita~ k.t