Star. — London, England, 1827-08-11 00:00:00

1 'l ' ,;i . , A.I. il 1 i . I; 1 ! ' . ' I I . • , 111 1 .1 , • r.l. not that the plaintiff entertained any apprehensions of the strength of his cause; and it so happened that•the defendants had been desiroospf availing themselvesf his services, thereby sheaving the apprehensions they had entertained; but having been previously retained Orr the plaintiff, they were prevented from availing them. selves of his !ramble talents. He must say the defence they had set up was not the most honourable or just. because they were, in fact, in possession of the mines in question. • A lotto fide sale had taken place, and the defendants were - now enjoying the era lumentsi derivable fusm that property ; and he therefore contended the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict. Mr. Justice LITTLIDALZ having summed np the evi• dente. left it to the Jury to say whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover. The Jury, after an absence of upwards of two hours, returned a' special verdict, " That the plaintiff was entitled to recover, and that the contract he had entered into with the defendants was made with them in their individual capacities, without any reference whatever to the fact of their being Directors of the British Iron Mining Company." The Ass:zes closed this afternoon, every cause having been tried, or otherwise disposed of. DERBY, Mouse 8. Thomas Shaw was indicted fur stealing a mare, the property of Henry Handford, in the parish of Cope, in this county. The prosecutor's wife turned the mare nut of the yard in his presence one evening, as usual, in July last year, that she might go either to water or pas. t.rre in the field. He saw no more of her for some months afterwards, when he found her near Asbbourne, in a close belongieg to a person to whom it appeared the prisoner had sold her for her full value, in open market, giving at the same time his true name and place of abode, which was in the same parish with that of the .prosecutor. Upon being apprehended, the prisoner caused the price of the mare to be returned to the per son to whom he had sold her. In his defence, he stated that he had purchased the mare from another person; but he offered no evidence of that fact. He called one or two witnesses, however, who gave him a good cha- The ptchecutor recommended the prisoner to mercy, on the ground that the prisoner had never done him any harm before. Mr. Justice Hot.ttovn told him, if his life were spared, that was the utmost extent of clemency which he could hope for, as he should certainly be sent out of the coun try' for life.—Judgment of death was then recorded against him. The grand Jury presented the County Hall as being out of repair, and unsuited for public business. This presentment was not returned before it was loudly called for, both by rue ruinous state of the building, and the very indifferent accommodation which the Courts, as at present constructed, afford fur the administration of justice. TNURSDAY, AUGUST 9. William Crossland, James Benzin, and George Lee, were indicted for picking the pocket of a person named Fletcher, of a pocket-book, and two 11. country notes. Bengin pleaded guilty ; and the others were convicted. They were sentenced to transportation for lite. The prisoner Crossland was then charged with mali ciously cutting Elisha Walton, with intent to disable him, or do him grievous bodily harm. It appeared that when the prosecutor seized the prisoner, on being charged with the above robbery, the latter cut his hand with a knife which he drew from his pocket, to make him let go his hold.—The Jury found him Guilty. Lord TeNTERDEN disposed of the cause-paper at an early hour to•day. There was nothing of general interest in any of the cases, which were mostly ejectments.— His Lordship after wards proceeded to assist Mr. Justice Holroyd in trying the prisoners. EXETER, AUGUST 9. Oyu. Sroz—Before Lord chief Justice Barr. DOE, ON THE DEMISE OF HEWITT, F. TOLCHARD. Mr. Sergeant WILDS stated that this was an extra ordinary case, in which the infirmity of human nature had been practised upon by knavery and cunning in the Most wanton:manner. The real plaintiff was Elizabeth, the sister of the late Richard Hewitt, who had inherited considerable property. The Hewitt, were unfortunately of very imbecile mind, and for the management of Richard's affairs, and to protect him from the designs of knaves and rogues, the defendant, who was a shrewd man, was appointed to ty.sist him. Hewitt was taken ill last April and died; but while in a sinking condition, the defendant, induced him to make a will, chiefly in his favour, except a legacy of 501. a }err to his sister Eli zabeth. On further consideration, however, Mr. Tol chitd thought that even this was too favourable a dis position of the property for Hennes family, and he prevailed upon the poor man to make a fresh will, be.itting the annuity to his sister, and merely griming a few legacies to see vants in the house, the test of the prriperty being bequeathed to himself. The pro of of ie:alonship of the parties was then given in evidence, and that the plaintiff was heir-at-law. Mr. WILLIAMS contended for the fitness and comps , : tency of Hewitt to dispose of hie own property in the way he wished. It would, indeed, be a harsh rule to establish, that none bra clever and expert men should have the right of devising their property, or that the ties of relationship should be indissolubly binding upon families, when so many instances occurred of gross mis behaviour among individuals who were clo.ely allied. In this case, there was abundant proof of the ill treat ment which Mr. Hewitt had experienced from his fa. Wily, and that he had repeatedly stated they should not inherit his property. This was declared when he was in perfect consciousness of what he was cloing_whiy,l he was farming his own estate, and purchasing another. It would also be sren that the will was framed and exe cuted with perfect deliberation by Mt. Hewitt, and thel knowledge of what he Was about. The will was then produced, and read in evidence: "it was dated the 11th of April, 1825. J. Angel, a common•looking man, was a subscribing witness to its execution, and resided in the parish of Ho!rre. He knew the deceased for the last 44 years, and hod been called in by him in the year 18'25 to make a will, but it was Mr. Tolchard who brought the in structions. The witness excited some laughter in Court, by declaring that he was in the habit of making will., or scratching out forms," for the peo ple of the roeighbourhuod. In the present ca.e, he repaired, when called upon, to Mr. Hewitt's house, where he found him lying ill, attended by Tolchard 'and the nurse. He ti ad over the will as he was MiStluctt d to draw it up, and Mr. flenitt said, that was his rrhrod ; the sick man then asked whether it was " ti: nt and good ?" and witness said it would be both when the signment" arid witnesses were iyur it. Mr. Hewitt then sat up in the bed by , Tolchard's desire, signed it, and the witnesses and the man then said it well r did what was right also ; " his seal and testament." Witness, at Mr. Hewitt'i desire, kept the will. On the Tuesday after he was sent' for again, to put a codicil to it, but he could not clearly describe its nature farther than that he took it from Mr. Hewitt's own mouth, who asked if *hat was d one was also " firm?" saying "this is my hand and seal." Cross-examined—The will now handed to him was the one which he had prepared from the draught given him by Mr. Tolchard; the one was conied from the other, except an alteration suggested by Tolchard ; and he could not say whether the alteration was an omis sion of the sister's annuity or not. lie was repeatedly pressed upon this point, but be persisted in declaring he had no other recollection of the parliculars, except that he had guided the hand of the deceased in affixing the signature. He was generally paid for will-making q bur as yet he had received nothing for this. It was Tolchard who first told him what-Mr. Hewitt meant to do, and then the latter repeated it. Witness admitted that he " repaired" the " W" in the will after it was written by the deceased. Lord Chief Justice Ban—Take care, fellow, -how you make these " repairs" in dying people's signatures in future, or else you may find the experiment dan gerous. I think it right by way of caution to tell you, you are not bound to answer some of these questions, for it is going too near the wind for your safety. His cross-examination was resumed, and, according to this will-maker's statement, the witnesses, after sign ing their attestation, remained to pray with Mr. Hewitt. la answers to questions from the Court, the witness said that he wrote the will from Tolcbard's draught, except the codicil, which was his own. . . The answers of the witness were throughout equivocal. Mr. Robert Tucker, a solicitor, said, that he knew the deceased, Mr. Hewitt, for two years previous to his death, and was acquainted with his signature. The subscription to the will (which was shewn to him) was, he believed, the handwriting of the late Mr. Hewitt. Early in April, in the year 1825, he was called upon by some of the relatives of the deceased to repair to Mr. Hewitt's bed-room, which he refused to do without the presence of a medical man. Mr. Jarvis accompaied him; when, in answer to the questions which he put, he said he had made a will, but did not say when, or to whom, though pressed for an answer. Tolchard was in the room, and witness asked if he had bequeathed his property to him ? he said, " Yes " He then asked if he wished to alter that will? He replied, " No, all was right." On being reminded that he had recently made another will, and inquired how his relatives had offended him, he made no answer. On the whole he appeared sensible of what he was doing. In his cross•examination, he said that Hewitt was unable to recognize him when he entered the room. He spoke very feebly, and the only words he uttered were " No, all was right." The other will had been made three or four months. There had been a previous arbi tration about some business of Hewitt's, in which Tol. chard said in evidence, that he considered Mr. Hewitt not to be in some parts like other men, adding, " He is not it to boy or sell upon his own strength: he was never sent by his father to fairs or markets ; never con. sidered he was fit for it, or to buy or sell property ; Goa Acestroures allictions also prevented him from judging the value of cattle." The Rev. John Glubb remembered having been called into Hewitt's to administer the sacrament on Easter-day, 1825. He asked him if be bad made his will? He replied " Yes." It was Tolchard called him in, and on the way told witness that he had been left the property. On inquiring from the sick , man if be had made the will, he replied yes; that be had made it to his mind. He appeased to the witness certainly to be at this time of a disposing mind, and capable of un• derstanding what was said to him. In his cross-examination, it appeared that the will which Tolchard had shewn him was the instrument con taining the legacy of 501. a year to the sister, and be fore the alteration by the codicil, reducing it to an an. nuity of 101. But he repeated, that Hewitt was perfectly sane when he said the will was made to his mind. Mr. George Jarvis, a surgeon, accompanied Mr. Tucker, the Solicitor, to Hewitt's house, and corrobora ted his testimony as to the declaration of the deceased, af firmatory of this will, and that he was in a disposing mind. A. Crispen, a woolcomber, and a subscribing witness to the will, saw its execution by Mr. Hewitt. In his cross-examination he said, there were only four persons in the room at the time. (Angel had said there were six.) John Leer, and his wife, deposed that they had seve rally heard the deceased declare he would not leave his property to either of the Irishes or the Hewitt:, the two branches of his family, as he had to complain of them both for inattention, and a de,ire to get at his property. He always said, that to settle the matter he should leave his estate away from them all. _ _ Thomas Gosa ell:an attesting witness to the codicil, spoke to the manner in which it wes alleged to have been executed. Mr. Sergeant WILDE, in reply, contended that the real view of this case depended upon the manner in which the Jury felt the force of Tolcbard's inteilerence in the affairs of the unfortunate and helpless deceased. —lle then, at some length, recapitulated the evidence tendered in support of the validity of the will, and com mented upon the extreme improbability of the story, which was evidently gamed to disinherit the helpless sister of the deceased. Lord Chief Justice BEST, in charging the Jury, hoped that no person would doubt the competency of any man to make whatever disposition of his property he pleased, without consulting his own relations, if he were of sound mind at the time, and felt that he had just cause of com plaint against those who ought to have served him, ihd owed a debt of gratitude to strangers. But in this case the whole conduct of the defendant was marked by in delicacy and suspicion ; and it was for the Jury, upon a full review of the case, to decide what degree of credit se,s due to either of the patties its the cause. His Lord ship then summed up the evidence with great perspicuity, and remarked upon the danger and uncertainty which must always attend the employment tat unprofessional persons in the arrangement of matters of so much serious import as the testamentary disposition of pro sperty ; for here they saw that the stone-mason who was employed on the occasion uas not content to make the will from 44 the scratching of the forms," as he described his rough copy, but must also take the trouble of ti n . kering the words, after he represented that they had been wi itten. Much of the discrepancy in the statement of some of the witnesses was fairly to be accounted for by the circumstance of there having been two wills, the one reducing the annuity which the other had conferred upon the ter. For his part he looked with the greatest suspicion at the u hole condurt uf the defendant. , The Jury found avt rdict for the plain damage . POLICE INTELLIGENCE.. .- 4 ,- MANSION-HOUSE. The cook at the New Yqrk Coffee-louse, near the Royal Et change, was charged, in conjunction with a man named Joshua Redding, with having robbed the house of sever..l articles at dif- ferent times. The circumstances under which•the various robberies were effected, are of more frequent occurrence than is generally ima gined. Hedging was introduced to the servants as the hualsrlit of the cook, ad he constantly visited her there, without hiving excited any suspicion of the actual nature of hi, acquaiatinct with her. The head waiter, however, found that property for which he was accountabk was disappearing. Bottles of spirits, wine glasses, &c. &c. were missed. At last three silver spoons vanished. It was then time to look about. The male prisoner, who was fre quently backwards and forwards, was followed, and in his lodg ings were found three bottles, containing spirits; three wine gl some segars, and other property. The bottle s the masts of the proprietor upon them, and it was believed that all the ar ticks were stolen from the eoffee.house. It also appeared that Redding had a wife and three children, in the greatest distress, and that he merely visited the female prisoner (or the purpose of cam „coining depredations in the house. The cook, upon being first put to the bar, fainted. It was stated that proof could be brought forward to shew that the male prisoner had possessed himself of the key of the bar, and applied to a locksmith for a counterpart of it, and that be declined leaving it for any length of time, in the fear that it would be missed—The prisoners were remanded for a few days. An elderly Gentleman, who said that he was a collecting clerk in a house of respectability in the City, charged a young woman of the town with having, with the assistance of another female, robbed him of ten sovereigns. The complainant, with a smile, told the Lord Mayor that he was rather tipsy when he met the prisoner and her companion, who led him from place to place, and were very sweet upon him, until he missed his purse. One of the Ladies then fled, but he secured the other, and gave her to a watehmin. . . The Loao MAYOIII thought that it would be useless to send the prisoner to the Old Bailey upon the mere words of a drua,ken man, and told the pro/aviator that nothing less than robbery could be expected under the circumstances. Prosecutor—But, my Lord, I hope you think that I have done my duty in bringing her forward. I might have been ro►bed of a much larger sum. The LOAD MAvoa — Oh. I think it quite patriotic in you to corn. forward and submit to such an exposure—(A laugh). The old Gentleman then retired, and the prisoner was sent to Bridewell for a month. , GUILDHALL. Yesterday Mr. Young, jeweller, of Newgate-street, applied for a warrant against a person be had about an hour before given in charge to an Aker for a fraud, and who had escaped from custody. Mr. Young stated, that the day before the person who had escaped came to him with a written order for a valuable brooch and pin, which were delivered to him. He came yesterday morning with a similar order for a diamond pin and a gold seal, the latter not to be higher in price than 31. Mr. Young having, since he gave the former articles, ascertained that the order on which he had given them was forged, on the person presenting a similar order yesterday, gave him into the custody of an officer, who searched him, when the brooch and pin he had obtained the day before were found upon him ; and about a dozen orders for goods addressed to different tradesmen, all of which are apposed to he forgeries. A witness, whose name was signed to the orders, presented to Mr. Young, proved that the signature was a forgery. The officer being called on to state in what manner the prisoner had been allowed to escape, said, as he was bringing him to the Justice Room, he complained of being thirsty, and asked to be al lowed to go in to take a drink of beer, to which the officer con sented; before he drank the beer he pretended to have occasion to go out of the room, and went out. The officer said he followed him in an Instant, but was not able to see or find him. Mr. Alderman Ke strongly condemned the °Rte.'s conduct, and told hint it should be represented In the proper quarter.—The warrant was then granted. BOW-STREET. Yesterday Sarah Elliott was charged by her master, Mr. Neill, upon suspicion of having stolen aM. note, a pearl broo ch, and some other trilling articles. The prisoner had been in Mr. Neill's service about three months, and until within the last few days, when the note disappeared, he had no complaint to snake against her. On missing the note, however, he upbraided her with being the thief, as it was impossible that it could have been taken by any one else, and accordingly he had her box searched, when a comb, a piece of ribbon, and some other articles, belonging to Mrs. Neill, were found, together with the duplicate of the brooch, on which a loan of is. log boon abtalised. Pain, the Mater, who apprehended the prisoner, produced the comb, ribbon, &c. which were Identified by Mrs. Neill. Mr. Arehlautt, a pawnbroker, produced the brooch, which bad been pledged by the prisoner, and which Mr. Neill identified. Mr. Evans, shupman to Messrs. Jennings and Poodle, linen. drapers, deposed to the prisoner's having purchased, at their shop, goals amounting to two guineas, for which she tendered a Hank of England 51. note, and received the difference, but he did not know the number. Sir R. litaing--Well then, that charge is one of mere suspicion; but there is abundance of evidence to send thepiiioner to trial. The prisoner male no defence. She was fully committed. UNION HALL Yesterday the driver of a cabriolet, No. 21, was summoned be. fore the sitting Magistrate, J. T. Howe, f.aq. charged with de manding more than his fare, and also with making use of abusive language to a Gentleman named Hunt, residing in Great Surrey. street, fhackfriars-road. The complainant stated, that on Wednesday last he hired the cabriolet in question on the coach stand opposite How Church, in . . Cheapside, and was driven along Blackfriiis-bridge, to the corner of Upper Ground-street at the foot of the bridge, where he alighted, and tendered the defendant Si. the distance being within the mile. The defendant said his fare was a shilling. Mr. Hunt, however, convinced that he had tendered the legal fare, refused to give him any more, offering hie card, and observing that the driver had his remedy at this office if he conceived he had not received his due. The defendant, instead of accepting either card or money, Inuit,- diately seised Mr. Hunt by the collar, and calling him a shabby fellow, said—" If I can't get it out of you by fair means, I'll shake it out of yon." He then proceeded to shove Mr. Hunt about, pointing him out to several people who had by this time collected on the spot, as a Fellow who went about bilking coachmen of their fares. The complainant having endured this kind of treatment for some time, at length gave the fellow a shining, glad to escape out of the m idst of a rabble who, influenced by the defendant, called out after him. and booted as he walked away. Mr. Hoes.—This is a very aggravated case. What have you to say in your defence? The defendant endeavoured to palliate his conduct by stating, that at the time be demanded the shilling from the complainant, be told bins that if it was more than the fare he had his remedy by summoning him (the driver) to a police °ice. He also called his master, who spoke favourably of his former character. The Magistrate, however, under all the circumstances, inflicted a penalty of 40s. and costs on the defendant. A hies. Bowdell and her daughter were brought up, charged tin der the Wilful Damege Act, with having cut up, and destroyed a rope mat, belonging to Mrs. Lumley, their neat dour neighbour.— This case exhibited in a remarkable degree the sway a fortune teller possessed over a superstitious mind. The complainant briefly stated the ciromutances. She said that a few evenings ago being absent from home, on her return she found the hall door-mat cut up in a thousand pieces. On subse quent inquiries, she ascertained to her satisfaction that the damage was committed by the defendants. Mr. Hose—Where are your witnesses? Let them be called. Complainant—l have no witnesses in attendance ;lamon my oath, and I hope that will be sufficient to convict those two persons. She here produced the remains of the mat, tied up in a cloth, and, looking earnestly at the defendants, said, " You know you have de stroyed my goods." blr. Hour—My good woman, we must have evidence to prove the case against the persons you have given into custody. Defendant— Your Worship, she consulted a fortune-teller about her mat, and the fellow told her that I and my daughter were the persons who spoiled it, and that has induced her to make the charge against us. Mr. Hone—How do you know that fact? Has she told you that she has been with a fortune teUer on the subject? Defendant replied, that the complainant had admitted to a fe male, then in attendance, that the moment she discovered her mat hadbeen cut, she procee ded: to the fortune-teller, who attributed the offence to have been committed by her and her daughter. This person was accordingly called,. and in reply to the Magis trate's questions, she said, that in a conversation she had with the coMphtinant, after the mat was destroyed, she stated that she had been with the" cunning man," who, on bring made acquainted with wear bad happened, drew the likenesses of Mrs. Briwdell and her daughter to the life, adding, that they were the persons who did the damage. The complainant, on being questioned relative to her having been with a fortune-teikr about the business, did nut slimy the DIEII Anna 9, in Jeffrey's-square, after a long and lingering illnen, in the 69th year of his age, William May, Esq. Consul Coast of his Majesty the King of the Netherlands, in Greot Britain. fact. and still asserted that aka was persuaded the defendants hsd acted in the manner she described. The Magistrate. having discharged the defendants, expressed 4 particular desire to know the residence of the '• cunning min," wk. he observed, would be a most excellent subject for the tread-wheel. Mrs. Lumley, who was the only person present who could give the information required, flaunted out of the once, saying, the kid no idea of making other people wiser than herself. COURT OF REQUESTS, WHITECHAPEL The parties and Mr. Pooh A ease was heard before the Commi p ss a ion stie e s rs: h e 7a; ing the right of the Rector, the Rev. Daniel Mathias, t y r e , a d r o e u d b w le er d e ues m r o . n w t i he id m bu a r u t . al t s h . e se l z ' an undertaker. A Mr. Bookless, an inhabita nt o f il l ; parish for the last 2S years, and haring l o d g i ngs at Upton-place, in Essex, about nine miles from two, died at the latter place, expressly desiring that he should be buried at St. Mary's. Mr. Pugh accordingly ma!! the necessary arrangements, and paid the usual burial fee:, 11. 111. but on the day of the fur.eral, Cl er k s Mr. Chapman, demanded extra foes, on mom t of the deceased having quitted life out of the parish. The son of the deceased, on being consulted, refu s ed to pay the extra fees, as being illegally claimed. The amount of these fees were 141. and a charge for over time of sr, the body not arriving at the hour appointed. O ft the examination of Mr. Wildman, he admitted that this was the first attempt made to obtain d , üble fees on ac. count of a parishioner dying out of the pail-h. The Commissioners were of opinion the demand coul.l rot b= sustained, for as well might the applicant claim double fees from a parishioner's friend, merely bec4use he happened to be taken suddenly ill, and died in ano. tiler palish. In a case tried at Eeaeter, on Tuesday (Pengelly Browne and Slane) to recover damages for assaulting and falsely imprisoning the plaintiff, an old man and a drainer of lands, the Jury gave Pengclly a verdict, with one farthing damages! Pengelly had cohabited with a woman, and the defendants, who are parish , ficers, apprehended him, in order to compel him to maitre th e woman; but the Magistrate, on a hearing, discharged him. The Lord Chief Justice Barr, in charging the Jury, observed, that the class of Attornies, like :very other, had its variotis elements. One set of Anomie ! were, he knew, men of tt e highest respectability, and of the greatest benefit to t.t'e community; while there was another which really was the greatest curse that could afflict any community, because they went about stirriug up litigation. for the purpose of squeezing costs out °ph pockets of those who had any money to roe. Yesterday afternoon, between four And five nVick, the cameleopard sent by the Ptcha of EGYPT as a pre. sent to his MAJISTY was landed from a barge lying of Waterloo-bridge, by means of a crane, and saki) coo , veyed into the Duchy Wharf, Savoy, Strand. Two Egyptian cows have been sent with the animal for the purpose of supplying it with milk; and two E typtian keepers have also accompanied it, by order of his High. ness. The animal at present remains at the above *he:. A serious accident occurred at Norton, near Buldock, onTuesday afternoon. A scaffolding was put up to rep it the steeple of the church: that on the west site gate st ay. in consequence of the bearers (English fir) breaking s;lnt, and precipitated a young man, 22 years old, a the name of Emeiy,workman to fifir.Crane, bricklayer,nf Baldock, from a height of 33 feet, by which his skull was frac• toned, and his face disfigured. After having that bones extracted from his head, be died on the folio wog morning,leaving a young widow, and two infant chi. dress. Two other men had just quitted the scaffold. NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKETS, Accost IS Beef. ss 4d to 41 4d I Veal Mutton ........Is 4d to 4s 4d Pork 3l 4d to Si id Lamb 4s Od to Ss !di i► HAY AND STRAW YESTERDAY aAsts's. Hay 81 Os Od to 51 18s Od Clover 61 Os Od to 61 10s Od Straw 21 Yo Od to 21 111 od Hay 41 os to sits , 04 Clover SI Os to 71 7, 01 Straw 1118 s to 2.1, 5sl2A PRICE OF HOPS, PER CWT. AUGUIa 10. 111 SW POCIOLTS. MEW sac. Kent 720 to Sons Kent ...... 63 410 le. Sussex Essex Farnham fine 112 s to 126s—Seconds. 64. to 105$ Old Duty laid at 9 5 ,000 PRIOR OF LEATHER. Best Dressing Rides l3de to 16d Common Ditto ..... .•.. ......... ............ Met° I Btl Crop Hides, 53 to 401bs for cutting ... Had to 17d Ditto 4S to Scabs.— 17a to isold Calf Skins, 58 to 40Ibs ...... Is 4 to Sid Ditto SO to 7Olbs Ditto 70 to 801b* ..... 2ld to 231 StnaU Seals, Greenland).— ......... 'fanned Horse Hides 124 to 15d Spanish Horse Hides... ..... PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP &c. per 112:6. Towa Tallow 42, od Yellow Soap ............ $33. C.] Yellow Russia ... White ditto —s od Curd .. ...... ..... ...... os a Soap ditto Melting Stuff ... ...... Tallow imported from St. P.tersburgh, 5321 casks. Ditto from Archangel, 630 ca , ks. Ditto from Odessa, 305 cats. 1 COURSE OF EX , Atnuerdam l2 3 C.F. Ditto at sight 12 0 Rotterdam... 2 U 12 4 Antwerp .........12 4 Rambnrgh 4} U 37 1 Akuna 21 U 37 2 Paris,3day'ssight 25 45 Ditto ........2 U 25 70 Madrid 34e Cadiz 34i Barcelona ........34 Bilboa 14} 'HANGS, Aucear to. Seville 34i Gibraltar 15 Leghorn 4B Genoa ..... IS 60 46 Malta Naples Palermo ...„ 1154 pet es Lisbon 49 Rio Janeiro... « 34 Dublin le PRICES OF GOLL Foreign Gold in Bars ... Silver, in bars, standard...... AND SILVER. . X 3 17 6 —........ .. a 4!i COAL MARKET. Annus:AO. Ships at Market. Ships Sold. Ptice. -, 1 271 Newcastle le i *a 9d to . • •, Il i Sunderland 1)1 541 6d to ____...... HIGH-WATER at LONDON-BRIDGE TO MO Morning 38 minutes .it, ♦fternoun 36 minute.,:.”l MAILS-THIS DAY. ♦RIL IMF. Fran t Waterfixd 1 0 Gurtusey and Jersey 0 0 Lisboa 0 0 Ifsniburg Flanders Swede* Doaagbadee Menus Ayres Hollaud i 0 I Halifax O 1 1 Jamaica O 0 1 Matta Lennon: Printed and Published by Joule Mayer, thy at the SIAS Off11:11, NO. 1, rickitt-ylare, Perakb.• int1:00. - (ter 4 O e 0 0 O ° 0 0 • ° Pr•Tnci Dublin 6€N S' 4 9