Star. — London, England, 1827-08-28 00:00:00

THE ROUNDS OF LIFE. Au. ere W0141:e1 • ST•EIL Some are serving, some commanding; Some are sitting, some are standing; Some rejoicing * some are grieving; Some intreating, some relieving; Some are Weeping, some are laughing; Some are thirsting, some are mailing . ; Some accepting, some refusing - - &me are thrifty, some abusing; Some competling, some persuading; Some are Battering, some degrading; Beene are patient, some are fuming; Some are modest, some presuming; Some ate leasing, some are farming; Borne are helping, scene are harming; Some are running, some are-riding; Some departing, some abiding; Some areeending, some are bringing; Some are erjing, some are singing ; Borne are hearing, some ate preaching; Some are learning, some are teaching; Borne disdaining, some affecting; Some assiduous, some neglecting; Borne are feasting, some are fasting; Some are saving, some are wasting ; , Bowe are losing, some are winning ; Some repenting, some are sinning; Eprofaning, some adoring ; are silent, some are rearing; are restive, some are willing • %Se preserving, some are killing; Some are bounteous, emu are grinding; Some atirmehing, some are finding; Some are thieving, mute receiving; *be are biding, some reveallag ; Same commending, some arablid~v Some dismemb'ring. is isur louse are quiet, mem dhpiuting; • Some mewed, mem umilitting; Some are marching ; NM retiring; Same are resting,iimbe cams undoing, mom 14.6114; Some are falling, seem us rising; Tbrais are sulicient is reeks, shine all men's deeds us infinite; ____, nom end dads parts wren sow boils, ao souse go oat, an/ some cow* la! LI. *WILE INTELLIGENCE. BRIDORW ATER. Morn 24. Cm Um—Before Mr. Judea &sum: DICZIIIIIOII V. ♦ALPY. This was an action brought by the plaintiff as endor see upon a bill, against the defendant, A. J. Val py, Esq. The bill was drawn by the country agent of the Corn wall and Devon Mining Company, for 3001. accepted D y their secretary in town, and ultimately dishonoured. TO plaintiff, in consequence, brought his action against Mi..Valpy, who was merely a shareholder in the con• cern, upon his liability, in that capacity, to be respon sible. Mr. Sergeant WILDE, in stating the case, said that this action was brought to recover SOOT., the amount of a bill of exchange from the defendant, who had be. come responsible as a shareholder in one of those com panies which had arisen in the metropolis in the year 1825. 'the company out of whose affairs this bill had sprung. was designated the Cornwall and Devon Min sag Company. Like all companies of this kind, the practical management devolved upon the hands of a few, who like active partners dictated and controlled the affairs of the company. By the authority of these managers, bills were permitted to be drawn, and ac cepted, upon the faith of certain mining arrangements which were undertaken between their agents in Corn wall and London. The Cornwall branch was under the management of Mr. Rowland Wilk:, and he had liberty to draw bills upon the London establishment. In this way the pie,ent bill had been drawn on the 20th of March, 1826, by Mr. R. Wilks s it was dull accepted by the London branch of the concern, but un fortunately never paid. What the defence would be he could not say : there could be no doubt of the comma . - dial regularity of the transaction as far as the plaintiff was concerned, and of the regular existence of the part nership, and conjoint liability of the partners. Ile should prove his case with the greatest facility, and rhea wait to hear what answer could be tendered for the defendant. Mr. Currie, who had acted as Secretary for the Com pany, proved a letter from the defendant, applying for a certain number of shares, and likewise that lie had duly paid the first stipulated instalment upon them.— The certificAte of this payment had been made out, but by some accident not properly transmitted to the de. tendmt, in the case of one of his SO shares. Mr. Wood proved the course of business of this Com pany, and that this bill had been duly drawn, and ac cepted by the agent, in pursuance of a resolution of the Directors, according to the provision made for the ma nagement of the Company. Mr. CROWDIR, for the defendant, submitted that this resolution assumed the shape and form of a power of attorney, and ought to be stamped as such, before it could be received as legal evidence. , Mr. Justice BUIIIIOUGH woulchiot reserve this point, for he really thought there was nothing in it. In the cross-examination of Mr. Wen d, he said there were a great many other partners, whose names were put down as belonging to the concern, but who had never acted. The late Lard Donoughmore's name was among the nominal Directors, but he never took any part in their business, or had any connection with their affairs; neither d d Sir John Perring, or several others, whose names were published in the printed list. The defendant was no party . .o the meeting where the reso lution to accept this bill was agreed to. He certainly attended a meeting of proprietors in July, 1826. Upon a question being put, whether at this meeting of July, 1826, it was not considered whether the whole business of this Company was a gross delusion?— Mr. sergeant WILDE objected to the question, and contended, that whatever was the complexion of the Company, this bill had reference to a bona fide transac• tion with an individual, apart from its concerns Mr. Justice Boastooost sustained the validity of the objection, and held, that the conjoint act of the partners themselves could not affect their individual liability to the performance of a specific contract. Among them sclves the case might be different; nct so, however, as between them and the public. Mr. Caownea then took an objection to the technical form of the declaration, and submitted that this was neither a bill nor a promissory note, according to the weaning of the Act of Parliament, inasmuch as, as sliming it to be a partnership concern, the members could not draw upon each other. He also submitted, that the provisions of the Bank Act, which interdicted certain partnerships, applied in this case. He likewise solicited for the admission of evidence to thew that the defendant knew nothing of the acceptance of this bill— that be had not had any idea of its existence until he was sued upon it,—and that the whole frame of this Com pany was a mere bubble, for which he ought not to be held answerable, who had no part in its management, or knowledge of its affiirs, beyond the misfortune of being .a shareholder. The Court consented to reserve some mere technical objections, but over-ruled the rest, repeeting, that what ever fraud mien be applicable to the constitution or management of this Company, could not be pleaded by one of its members against an individual of the public who had given value for a bill of this description. ,The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for SOW. and the interest upon the bill. HEREFORD. Auause 44. CIVIL &DZ.—Before UN Baron VavISSIL/L RICICETT N. DIMLY!' PRIED' AND °THINS. Mr. WHATILIM opened the pleadings, stating that this was an action to ascertain whether the defendant was entitled to a certain right of way which he claimed 'through the property of the plaintiff. The defendant Was the purchaser of an estate from Lord Oxford, part of which consisted of a wood known by the name of Brand-hill-wood, and was situate on the summit of a precipice, four miles from Presteign, in this county. The plaintiff is a barrister, and the owner of certain woods, situate on the same hill, below the defendant's wood, and known by the names of Combe-woodAnd Hope's-wood. The defendant having cut down his wood and dragged the timber and cuttings thereof through the plaintiff's wood, the present action was to try whether be was entitled to that right of way? The defendant had pleaded an immemorial right of way to drag the produce of his woods, when cut, through the plaintiff's; and it would be for the jury to determine, on the evidence that would be offered to them, whether that tight could be established. Mr CAMPEELt (with whom was Mr. WHITC3/11$2) ippeared for the defendants, and then commenced, as it rested on the defendants, to maintain his claim to the right of way in question. The learned counsel stated that the real question-in this case was, whether the defendant was by prescription entitled to convey or haul trees. through the plaintiff': woods along certain roads or courses celled racks, which had been imme ;aerially used for that purpose? and as it was eviden ly impossible for the defendant to convey away the pro. duce of his land by any other means, there could be no doubt the way in dispute was a way of necessity, which had been immemorially used, and admitted to be used, for that purpose, the woods originally having belonged to one person. The defendant would be unable to produce any deeds in support of that right, but that was immaterial, as where a custom had been exercised for a considerable period, the law pre sumed that it originated in some deed or grant which had been loit or destroyed through the lapse of time. He (Mr. Campbell) did not know who had drawn the declaration in this case, or from what black letter book he had extracted the precedent: he had not supposed that even the maggot-eaten pages' of the Year-books could have afforded such an example. He and the Jury had now got into a wood together, but he trusted he should be able to make the case so clear to them, that they would have no occasion' to Milo before they got out of it. He understood that it wa,s intended to contend, that only a qualified right existed, viz. that none of the produce of Brand-hill should be conveyed through Combe Wood or Hope's Wood, while any timber of twelve years growth was standing there; but he (Mr. , Campbell) was prepared to maintain, that if the defend 'ant was entitled to any right of way through the plain tiff's premises, it was an unqualised right of way, such as the necessity of the case demanded. - Another objec tion which he believed would be raised was, that the defendant was not entitled to convey any timber from his wood through the plaintiff's property exceeding thirty years' growth. Sa that trees that had attained the age of 29 year:, 11 months, 29 days, 25 hours, 59 minutes, and 59 seconds, might be so removed; but the instant the clock struck, terminating the 30th year, the de fendant could not venture to cut his own trees, because he could not, when cur, carry them away. Mr. WHATELET disclaimed any intention to raise such objections. Several witnesses were then called, who proved the right of way to convey t.t.e produce of Brand-hill-wood I through the plaintiff's property. Mr. Cuawooo, who led for the plaintiff, submitted [ that he was entitled to a verdict, as the prescription was laid as a right to convey trees, Ece. through the plain tiff's premises, and that had not been proved ; for by the evidence it appeared, that underwood only had been permitted to pas.; and it was obvious, if large trees were removed that way, they would greatly injure the plaintiff's woods. Mr. WHATzL&Y followed on the same side, contend ing that prescription meant immemorial usage as far back as living memory would go. The prescription in this case was for trees only, and the evidence applied to underwood alone. The distinction was manifest, and Dr. Johnson would never have had an opportunity of venting his sarcssm during his tour through Scotland, that he had seen only two trees there;' if young seed lings and suckers of trees could have been considered as trees, as it was well known that at that time Scotland abounded with numerous young plantations. The va riance, he therefore maintained, was fatal. Mr. CAUPSILLL having been heard in reply, Mr. Baron VAUGUAN overruled the objection. Mr. Cvawooa than addre,sed the Jury for the plaintiff. Mr. Baron VAUGHAN having recapitulated the evi dence, the Jury found a special verdict, viz, that an immemorial right of way existed for the defendant to convey the produce of his land through the property of the plaintiff. BLAXEMeRE V. THE GLAMORGAN/MINI CANAL COMPANY. Before Mr. Justice LI , aad a Special Jury. After calling an immense number of witnesses, whose evidence was intended to prove the loss sustained by the plaintiff by the obstruction of water from his works by the defendants, the case on the part of the plain tiff closed yesterday. On cross-ex imination, one of the witnesses for the plaintiff stated, that if the plain. tiff had exerted the machinery of his works to the ut most extent, he might have manufactured more tin even with the diminished supply of water complained of. Atsthe conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiff, Mr. TAUNTON addressed the Jury for the defendants at great length, and the whole of this day has been occupied with the examination of their witnesses, their evidence tending to skew that the inconvenience sustained by the plaintiff was occasioned solely by dry seasons ; that there was no waste of water by the defendants ; and that all the surplus water above what was required for navigating the boats on the canal, was, by the Perlis. mentary and other weirs, turned into the river Teak. At eight o'clock this evening, the case on the part of the defendants closed, ■nd the Court adjourned till Monday, the greater part of which, it is expected, will be occupied by the reply and summing up. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. • mANsiox•Housg. A inan sassed ,berit was brought before the Loan Marna charged with having accidentally assaulted a young man named Ryan, so desperately, as to endanger his hi . .. lhe defendant had been, It appeared, upon a ladder, and Ryan had a piece of bent iron In his hand, with which, in a joke, he caught hold of the defendant's leg. The defendant leaped down laughing, and taking up the piece of Iron pursued the young man, dung it at tam, and accidentally, and without Intending to do him the least mischief, struck hint wide one of the points, which penetrated his forehead. The boy said" You have caught me," and immediately dropped down senseless. The poor boy's wound scarcely bled at all, but upon being taken to the Hospital, the injury was pronounced to be dangerous. A certificate to the tame elect wan handed to the Lord Mayor. A witness, who saw the whole transaction, stated that the In jured boy and the defendant had bees merely joking together, and that there was not the slightest animosity existing between them.— The defendant appeared to be very much dejected, and disavowed any, the slightest . , intention of doing the lad any harm. The LORD MATO& sa id „it was evident that the defendant had . . . . . . committed no intentional offence. His Lordship believed the injury to be merely accidental; but he could not help detaining the person accused, as he had received such a certificate from the surgeon who attended the young man. The defendant was then taken batk to the Contra. GUILDHALL. - Paul Bennett a miner, Edward Repaint, a porter, were charged with assaults and itairt Barnicuat, • printer, with an attempt at rescue.—Bennett. it seems saw one of the females of light charac ter adjusting her head - dres s ' in Paternoster-row, at twelve o'clock on Sunday night, and running up to her, pulled her about by her veil till he threw her down ; she called to the watchman. who tried to lay hold of the prisoner ; but, receiving a staggering hit in the mouth, contented himself with pursuing and springing his rattle. A watchman at the top of the Row tried to stop him, but was knocked down. Ito prisoner however was seized by a watchman, named Randall, in Friday-street • a struggle towed, the prisoner bit him twice on the head, kicked ithn in the groin, and finally knocked him dawn. The prisoner then ran over to Milk-street, at the corner of which be knocked a very powerful watchman down ; bat his career was stopped in that streetby another guardian of the night named Barker; but be ton was knocked down by Rapston. The heroes, however, could escape no farther ; the pealing of the rattles spread alarm far and wide, and orescairis watchmen were in the pursuit. Mr. Mashy and Mr. Williams, two of the Common Councilmen, new appeared to pray protection for their watchmen, and punish ment for the annoyance their constituents had undergone in having their slumbers broken. However. Mr. Alderman Lucas did not view the matter in a very serious light, and allowed the primaeval to retire and make compensation. after giving them a 'event lecture. This frialic cost them 31. , BOW-STRERT. Yesterday morning two Gentlemen, named Williams and Perrin, partnered themselves before Sir Ricmaan Maids and Mr. Hm.r.s, the Sitting Magistrates, and stated that they appeared for the pur pose of entering into sureties on behalf of Sir Gregor M'Gregor, who was in custody on a charge of sending a challenge to a Gentle. man named Spong, to light a duel.—Mr. Memsnucc, on Saturday evening, gave directions that twenty-four hours' notice of bell should be given, and that the notice should be %erred upon Mr. Spong as well as the Office. Notice had been served upon Mr. Spoil, in pursuance of the Magistrate's order, and that Gentleman , was consequently in attendance with his Solicitor. The Officer presented the book to Messrs. Perrin and William►, for the par pose of administering the oath in the usual manner; but they de cHned being sworn, stating as a reason for their refusal, that the legal adviser of Sir Gregor M'Gregor was dot in attendance, mina Mr. Spong had a Solicitor with hint, questions might be asked which they might not think proper to answer, and they wished to be protected from being called upon to answer impertinent questions. The Gentlemen withdrew for Vtielr, and V& Gregor M'Gregor was sent for from the Watch House, and appeared before the kla giurates: • Mr. HALL' informed Sir Gregor M'Gregor that the persons who had appeared to give bail for him had refose4 to be sworn, and, therefore, he should direct his commitment to be made out. Sir Gregor M' Gregor said, that he understood the parties had no objection to bail him. Mr. liat.% directed the clerk to read the evidence, and when that wag done, he directed the clerk to make out a warrant of com mitment. _ _ Sir Gregor 51. Gregor said, be thought he was treated with same degree of harshness under the particular circumstances of the case . .. . .. Mr. Spong-- , The Magistrates will observe that this challenge was Mlittets after it bad bees Ind/wawa so Mr. ht•Oregoe{W ba would not be tre..ved upon the footle' els Gemkman. Mr. HAL 4 &died if the defendant had any thing to say *by be should not be committed in default of ball? Sir Gregor M•Gregor replied, that his friends were ready to ball him, and there was no danger of his ever being out of the way to answer any complaint. bit. Spong replied, that be had been for Weeks endenonriog to find him. Sir Gregor M' Gregor admitted having written the challenge with the Intention which had been imputed to bim. the complainant bad gone about the City using expressions calculated to Injure his reputation, and also the reputation of his friends ; and being so calumniated, he called upon the propagator of the slander to give hint a meeting. The reason he addressed dui note to Mr. Eden was, because be could not find Mr. Spong. Mr. Spong said, be was always to be found, bat Mr. M'Gregor could not be found, notwith►tanding the mint active search for several weeks past. Sir RICHARD RIRMIR-.-TILII is strange! because he Is s MID of rank : he Is a General ! Mr. Spong—l do not know by whom he was appointed. Sir Gregor M'Gregor—l am a General in the Colombian ser ♦ice--undrr a Government which has been recognized by the Bri tish Government—and I have my commission to produce if the Magistrates doubt my assertion. The accused was ultimately committed to prison, and the Magis trates informed him that be must give 24 hours' :mitre of ball to the office, and also to Mr. Wilda, Solicitor for Mr. Spans. About an hoer afterwards Mr. Acsocenus appeared before the Magisttates on behalf of Sir Gregor /41.0regor, and stated the res. son why the ball declined being sworn. It was not because they were not competent to enter Into the required sureties, but they wished to have Catania present. Messrs. Williams and Perrin were then called in, and gave their respective addresses. Mr. AMPODPIIUS said he could not ask the Magistrates to retrace their steps and set aside the order they had given for twenty-four hours' notice of bail, and he now gave notice that these Gentlemen would attend this day to put in bail. Sir Rummel) Maxie said that no objection could be taken to Mr. Williaass,but he had not the honour of knowing the other Gentleman. HATTON-GARDEN. Mary Callaghan and Dialled Lynda, two utterers Obese calm and who have been in custody sham the 7th of July, were finally examined on the capital charge of colouring, sad also as befog titterers of counterfeit cohi. Mr. POwell, the Mint solicitor, and Mr. Field, an inspector, were present, but by the express order of Mr. Lando, the room was cleared of all pet sons not immediately interested in the examinadee. The following are the facts connected with the case. Some time before the apprehension of the prisoners information was received that they were selling, but at the time not the slightest suspicion was entertained that colouring formed part of their employ. ment. In consequence of this information a person named Kelly was employed to make purchases, and marked money was given him for that purpose. Being in some degree known to the parties, they felt no scruple in proceeding with their business before him, and on more than one occasion he was compelled to wait while the colouring and finishing off was performed - by the prisoners.— These circumstances being communicated to the officers, Limbrick and Kirby went at an appointed hour to the residence of the prison ers, at a retired house in Chegaer•alley, Bunhill.row, and succeeded in apprehending them both. On searching the apartmerff, two of the marked shillings were found in a little bag, hanging by the bed side, and in other places a quantity of grey powder and other articles used in the process of colouring. Several pieces of base metal in an unfinished state, and some ready for circulation, were also db., covered. The whole of these articles were produced, and were strictly scrutinised by the Mint Authorities.—The prisoners offered nothing in their defence, and were fully committed for Web Two lodging -house keepers in Fidel-lane were charged... neces saries to a robbery. T. Hedges, a farmer at Aylesbury, observed, with tears running down his cheeks, that he had brought a few pigs to &Richfield Market, when a nice-looking woman took a liking to one of them, and in order to close the bargain, took him to her lodgings, where tie prisoners claimed him as a countryman, and appeared vastly civil. After a short conversation about the harvest, &c. the pig-fancier pretended to hear a knock at the door, and went down, but forgot to return. Soon after, he put his hand in 1-bis pocket to treat his new-found country-folk, when he discovered It had been emptied of its contents (SL) He then went into the street sad told his story, when a constable apprehended the pd. soccer% who said, if he would let them go, the money should be re turned. tibiae retina ; and the Magistrate said, if it was m t ( ( mum*, by twelve o'clock thif day, he, would commit the m , [ aceonspliees. At any rate, Hodge appe a r e d io think he had brosai lt Marks pia bad market. QUERN4QUARP.. Q. Webb was charged with sending a threatening letter to lir. Hu, gunsmith, in the Opera Colonnade. It appeared, the Osca n had Used with Mr. E. as kardener, but, in comecturnee of som e misunderstanding, the, parted, when he summoned Mt. R. r ar money, which be said was due to him ; but which the COMMIS. A me n pee against him, in consesplenee of which, he sent hiss a letter stating, that he would have satisfaction, if Mr. E. would ma give it hint in nanney, he ihtinld, by opining hii bleed, or be wool.' spill his (Mr. Ws). In defence, be told a zhodmisentad e Keay, aaa was ordered to give 24 boors' notice of bail. BRIGHTON, Aucturr 24. At the Sitting of Magistrates, yesterday, a ey e 0 1 most revolting cruelty to a mare was stated. It 20. ',eared that a Gentleman, residing at an hotel in sike town drove her in a gig to a place called Newhav e n, about nine miles from Brighton, on her return bolsi which she kicked, and was restive. Instead ot flagging die poor animal at the moment, he kicked and heather when she was brought back to the stable and finished by tying her to the rack, with a rope passed through the mouth. In this state she was left, without food, from about half-past six o'clock in the evening till nine, when the Gentleman came again to the stable, a n d ordered the ostler, who had previously remonstrred with him, to release her. When the rope was loosened, it wits found that its pressure had literally severed a large piece of the poor animal's tongue, which hung so loosely to the rest that the ostler cut it off the nett morning with a knife, not liking to do it by candle light the same evening. When first cut off, it was five inches long; and on ;is being produced to the Magi*: trates, although dried and shriveled up, it was still three inches. It is unnecessary to describe the feeling produced in Court by this statement, which unhappily cannot, it would seem, be punished except by the en posure that has been made of the circumstance; fori on referring to Mr. Martin's Cruelty Act, it was dig, covered that information under it must be laid withi n ten days ; while, in this case, fourteen had elapsed since the transaction. A curious case was heard a few days ago at the Head Police Office, Dublin. A Lady, twenty years of age, of highly respectable connections, was charged with four others with conspiring to entrap a young Gentle: man of fifteen into a marriage, which was performed at Gretna Green. The young Lady was held to bail, but three persons were committed to pri.on on the charge. The bridegroom was sent to the house of his father. The names of the parties have not transpired. Monday, Patrick Walsh was tried at Clonrnel Assizes, for the atrocious murder and burning of the Shea', at Tubber, in the county of Tipperary, on the might of the 19:h of November, 1821. This important ease excited a strong and general feeling of anxiety: the Court House was crowded, and at six o'clock is the evening the jury retired for deli beration. There appear. ing no probability olio agreement, the Court adjourned to next day, the jury remained in all night, and at tea o'clock on the morning when the latest accounts left, they had not then found a verdict, and prepararion were being made for kicking the panel to the b ,undr of the county. Last Spring Assizes Par. Gorman was found guilty and Wit:emoted to - I...this. horrible outrage. It is ascertained that the loss of piaperty occasiawd by the sinking of the Mary, from London to Theme, off Goole, amounted to upwards of 19001.-11001. el which wire goods for different tradesmen in . Shetheli At a meeting of the sufferers, held at the King's Head, on Thursday week, Messrs. Pearson and Co., the owner, a the vessel, agreed to pay three fourths cf the loss sustained. DIED. James Boller, Esq. of Downes,wio for a period of twenty-dint years eras the Representative of Exeter in Parliament. August 10, at the Rectory House, Nestoo, aged 11, the Req. Thomas Ward, A. M. Vice• Dean and Prebendary of the Cathedral of Chester, Vicar of Nelson, and Rector of Handley. Amgen I S, aged 63, Mark Temple, Ea+ postmaster, of Leeds. At Geneva, U. S. soddenly, to the 10th ult. Mr. Arthur Bate, jam bookseller, late of Greenock: At Ballyshatinno, cm the 4th inst. Ensign William T. JAM*. tithe Edinburgh Militia, late of Ayr. At Dundee, on the 10th inst. Mr. Thomas Donaldson, beak. • in the Ssd year of his age; sod, on the following mataial, his daughter, Jane Williamson, aged nine years. Mr. Donaldson has been long known as a most respectable and extensive boa. seller, and has died regretted by a numerous circle of friends std acquaintances. On his passage home from Rio Janeiro, South America, Jobs tittle, late Assistant Surgeon In the Dunsfries.ddre militia, aids* of the late Rev. James Little, Minister of Colvend. NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKETS, Amen fi Beef. 5l 4d to 41 4d Veal 4B Od to 54 Od Mottos .. ..... .Ss 4d to 4s 44 I Pork 4s 4d. to Qs 011 Lamb 411 Od to 4s tod ______ PRICES or HAY exa STRAW YESTERDAY. • sr. aAxes's. Hay 51 Os Od to .51 17s Od Hay 31 158 to 51 lA ed Clover 6116 Od to 71 Os Od Clover 51 Os to 71 Os!! Straw 11 16s Od to 21 5s Od Straw 21 Os to 21 ago PRICE OF HOP -_ .... Amour 117. ew• el rOcZers. • MIW SAM Keit Ewen .., 651 to 76. Sum: &lex Na—Seeoods s Ht to 105. Farnham fine Wits to 1 Old Duty laid at XlOB,OOO. PER C PRICE OF LEATHER. Best Dressing Hide l3ld to 16d Common Ditto 164 to led Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for cutting l4id to 17d Ditto 45 to 501bs l7d to 1914 Calf Skins, 56 to 401bs led to 2.5 d Ditto SO to 701bs Ditto ' 70 to 60Ibs ..... Small 5ea15;treen1and)................... led to 194 Tanned Horse Hides Spanish Horse Hides... COAL MARKET. August th Ships at Market. Ships Sold. Pt ice. 72 Newcastle 27 29s 9d to 39f 5d 28 Sandetiand " id to sos MAILS—, Mill. DOI. AIM 1 0,6 Dublin 1 0 Franca 1 0 Waterford 1 0 Hamburg 0 0 Goernswy and Jenny 1 0 Flanders 0 1 Lisbon 0 0 Sweden 0 0 Donanhadee 0 0 Brazil 0 / 0 Buenos Ayres 1 0 America 0 `inland 0 1 Leeward Islands____l_,..2. 'HIS DAY. 14 I u 11- w ATMit at LONDON-BRIDGIC TO MORROW. Morning 2S minutes atter 6 Afterno 53 minute 6 on • [amour: l'ranted and Pt. ked _ by _ Onn _larva, the Prnpntinft at the Saga Orrtcr. Na 1, Pickettplace, Tempi-Da. I -, I .01 V.‘ '4O J old di - • •a .1 1 1 1. lute vtai Ulm —A .ti ram oft r ti awl se k IC 'CA Bat Em et t TM ulti hint 11111 deb Us( !ad woo irk dim th IN 7w MARRIED. Rev. J. P. Mosley, Rector of Rollestone, StaffordsLirs, to Fraintes, relict of the Rev. Edward Pole, Rector of Radboroe sad Eggington, Derbyshire. . Rev. Peter Still, B.A. Fellow of Kiss's College, Cambridke, to Anne, second daughter of the late Henry Hughs, Esq. of klalitt street, London. Lowly, at Harper's Ferry, Mr. M'Kenny, to Mrs. Jackson, lee being theLady'sfifsA husband, and she only in her turwreWhdtgeff? I . 1 Li