Star. — London, England, 1827-05-22 00:00:00

-• • , ofisin eonstitoents;he trusted the Honourable Gentle- time." This showed what ejtravagant ideas ...- eau woods gike them credit for not having formed any entertained . upon the subject. He entreated the atten okfution without the fullest and most mature considera- !Soo of the House, and be would not`cittain them, but lion. In the coarse of the investigation of the Emigre - it was of the o tmostimportance that these enormous n iton Committee, cases of extreme and peculiar distress no ti ons sho u ld be co ected s and that the d ehis i on which came to the knowledge of the Relief Committee then appeared to have taken hold of the publichtind should sitting in the City of London, and this Committee of- be dispelled. Nothing was more certain than that Go feted to advance a such of money to relieve these unfor- vernment had never entertained any such project as tunate sufferers by means of emigration, upon condition these Petitioners appeared to suppose; and in proof of that an equal sum ',maid be advanced from some other this, if proof were wanted, he would read a part of the quarter. This proposition the Emigration Committe e re p ort of the Emigration C mmittee. The Hon. Gen took into consideration, and presented a report to the denim here read an extract from the report, which li- House recommending its adopron. From circumstances mites the class of persons to be assisted in emigrating to which it was only necessary to allude l Gavernment was to agricultural labourers, and from parishes whose ex prevented from coming to any immediate decision. He tent precluded the expectation that they could ever yield was happy now to say, that since that period a change employment to the actual number of labourers settled materially affecting the question had taken place. There within them. was a visible, sensible, agA stowing improvement in the Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN complained that - br condition and prospected all the great' branches of ma- had riot yet obtained an :newer from the Right Homo nufacturing industry. The change he now found to be Gentleman: He wished to know whether the Rip( much greater than on a mien' occasion; he had thought Hon. Gentleman intended to present the Petition which himself justified in stating, so much so, that although had been entrusted to him four or five months ago.— wages were not high, let nobody need be without He rut this question to him as a Members t Parliament, work. These reports hadaieer, received by Government, and not as a Minister. and also by the Relief Committee.-In these altered Mr. W. WYNN did not know that it was in all cases cumstances, and apprized of elle que s tion which he the duty of a Member of Parliament to present a Peti should that night be called wren to answer, be had seen Lion to the House, particularly if he thought he could some of the Gentlemen composing the Emigration Com- dispose of the Petition more advantageously for the miner, and had asked them if in these new circum- objects of the Petitioners. He had, as he before stated, stances, and aware as they had expressed themselves to handed over the Petition to the Colonial Department, be, of the inconvenience of applying the public funds to and it appeared that it subsequently found its way to the relief of local distress, if they would now have ex- the Committee, sitting upon the very subject to which ! pressed the same opinion as they did at the period when it related. this proposition was made to them. They answered E m i grati on Society tbs . me Pe of tid i on, ar w k h: D oll urns Renfrew, wasthe tEmbesigt brought tip as might have been expected, in the negative, upon the Co unties Mr. MAXWELL moved that it be read at length, and express general principle that a minimum of interference on the ed his approbation of the open, straight-forward, and candid lan part of Government is tie point constantly to be aimed guage of the Right Hon. Gentleman. at, and that the most pressing distress is the only apo. The Petition was then read, ordered to lie on the table, and to be prodlogy to be offered for any ioterference whatever. He STANLRY presented a Petition from the Blackburn could not omit this opportunity of expressing his high Emigration Society, praying for assistance. sense of the services rendered to the community by the CORPORATION AND TUT ACTS. Relief Committee. The zeal, assiduity and prudence Mr. PORTMAN presented a Petition from a congregation of they had manifested, entitled them to the warmest Protestant Dissenters in the county of Dorset, praying the repeat praise. They had entitled themselves to the gratitude of the Corporation and Test Acts. of the counts yas much by what they had suppressed as Sir H. PARNELL_presented a similar Petition from Abbots by what they had granted. It was oa ing to them that teat, lathe County of Gloucester. a Petition to the same effect from the' the pressure had been less severely felt, than at former Protestant h.il L Dits S ejer e s of t ed Hroly-upon-Thames. Minds, even when the causes of distress were neither These Petitions were severally ordered to lie upon the table. • so deep nor so extensive. He could not withhold this Mr. EASTHOPE had several Petitions to present homage from the men who had undertaken so burden- upon the same subject. He lamented that the Right some a duty and discharged it so highly to their own Hon. Gentleman at the head of his Majesty's Govern= honour and to the advantage of the public. He should ment should have expressed himself so decidedly against ,conclude by sayipg, that he thought it the imperative the principles of religious liberty, of which he had beets duty of Government to abstain from any extraordinary supposed to be the friend, and he more particularly la measure of relief now that they found if not the distress tnented that he should have done so now that he was that the urgency of the distress was removed. connected with those who had hitherto professed them- Mr. Alderman wAITHMAN said, that he believed selves the most zealous advocates of those principles. the distress to be still very great. He wished to enquire He must remind the Right Hon. Gentleman and the of a Right Hon. Gentleman what he had done with a House that the claims of the Protestant Dissenters bad • Petition that had been entrusted to him a long time been constantly before Parliiment for the last thirty ago, from a person who had emigrated to Colombia, years—that they were claims which merited tl eir molt and of which he had a duplicate in his pocket ? serious attentive consideration; and he would also say Mr. W. WYNN had received the Petition of the in- they were claims which would never be relinquishe4.l dividual alluded to, which had nothing to do with that The Hon. Member then brought up Petitions for tbi department of the Government with which he was con- repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts from the Pro nected. He had referred the Petitioner to the Colonial testant Dissenters of a place in Monmouthshire; of Department. Chepstow ; of Ottley, in Suffolk; and of a town in the Mr. W. HORTON said, that the Petition was'from a county of Norfolk. person .who had emigrated, not to any of the British On the question that the last of these Petitionsbe read, Colonies, but to Colombia. His statements could not, Sir T. LETHBRIDGE said, he wished to take that therefore, come uncle, the consideration of the Colonial opportunity of putting one or two questions to the Cha n He had laid the Petition before the Emi- cellar of the Exchequer. The questions which he should gration Committee, who had not yet made their general put naturally grew out of the answer given by the Right Report ; but if the Hon. Member wished to take any Hon. Gentleman to questions which he (Sir T. L.) put steps, he could get him his Petition back again. to him eight or ten days back, On Friday last he should Mr. WOOD attiibuted the increase of employment have endeavoured to obtain the information he now in the manufacturing districts to the extreme low price sought, but the Committee of Supply not having been of goods, and to the great reduction of stock upon the gone into, he was deprived of the opportunity. It be- Continent. He hoped the Emigration Committee would came the morenecessaty to put these questions now, in pursue its labours, as this was a subject which might be consequence of what had transpired in another place. •better investigated, and upon which a more sound opi- The House and the country had a right to be informed nion might be formed at any other period than one of of the circumstances which led to the breaking up of severe and unusual distress. He compared the situation the Late, and the formation of the new Administration. of the manufacturers to that of a person in an intermit- His former question to the Right Hon. Gentleman was tent fever, this, whether the. Right Hon. Gentleman had been in Mr. CANNING said, that he apprehended he had such communication with his former opponents in that not been perfectly understood. His question to the House, as to produce the offer of their support under Members of the Emigration Committee related solely the condition of his being placed at the head of the Go to the application made to them by the Committee of vernMent? The Right H, nourable Gentleman admitted Relief; and all that he had said applied not to the ge- that be had been in communication with those who neral object of the Emigration Committee, but to the were before his strenuous opponents, and that he separate and isolated object to which their partial re- received an overture from them to the effect mentioned. port and recommendation had referred. It was, he believed, generally understood by the House, Mr. BARING made a few observations in favour of that this was the nature cf the admission made by the a general and permanent system of emigration. The Right Hon. Gentleman. His object now was to ascer distinction of the Right Honourable Gentleman was, •tain when such an overture was made. The Right however, a very proper one. The Resolution of the Hon. Gentleman had a right to thank him for putting Emigration Committee, of which he was a member, the question in a spirit of candour, and he trusted it upon the application of the Relief Committee, had been would be answered in a similar spirit. He wished,there adopted unanimously ; but he, for one, should not vote fore, in the first place, to be informed when the overture for it if it were to be put now. He did not know hots was made, and if, when made, it was communicated to long the present activity in the manufacturing districts his Majesty? The next question he should ask was, Might last, but by the accounts recently received, and whether such overture had been communicated by the particularly those of this morning, it appeared that no Right Hon. Gentleman to his Colleagues, toall or to any good hands were out of employ, and that there was no of-them? He expected such an answer as would be longer any severe pressure of distress, respectful to the House aad satisfactory to the Right Mr. PHILLIPS said that he concurred in opinion Hon. Gentleman himself. It was necessary to his cha with his Hon , urable Friend the Member for Preston. teeter, and to the character of those with whom he now The improvement, he believed, as yet was partial. The acted, that the circumstances of the case should be more lowness of the stocks upon the 'Continent enabled them clearly understood. It was by' no means his wish to to account for the long-cuiltinued stagnation, and at provoke discussion, or to enter into any further observa the same time afforded the best hope of permanent ac- tions at present. tivity. He hoped the manufacturers would not be in- Mr. N. C ALVERT said he thought the Hoti. Baronet doted by this appearance of prosperity to create exces- was going to say something relative to the Protestant sive stocks, as they bad formerly done. They would be Dissenters, as the Petition related to them. He must sore, if they did so, to occasion another similar revul. deprecate this mode of proceeding—(Hear). • And he sion ; and, however cautious they might be, still alter- hoped the Right Hon. Gentleman would not offer one nations would occur, He doubted whether a general word in answer to the. questions of the Hon. Baronet. system of emigration was necessary for this country. Mr. CANNING said he should par.ly comply with The great diflicolty of the question presented itself from the recommendation of the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Cal- Ireland, whose redundant population it was necessary, vert). He must divide the speech of the Honourable for the welfare of both countries, to reduce within such Baronet into two parts. The first related to what passed bounds as might enable every man to maintain Limsel: - . on a former day, and the second consisted of certain Mr. W. HORTON would not long occupy the House, questions now put by him. If the Hon. Baronet should but as he had sonic Petitions to present v h ch wou'd not be more suzcessful in comprehending the answers require an observation or two from him, he would take to his n..w than to his old questions; the time would be this oppotturety of offering them. Tne Petitioners thrown away in answering them. He (Mr. Canning) seemed to be led, away a ith the idea, that Government did not answer the questions of the lion. Baronet upon had it in contemplation to remove all the people of this a former night in the terms he supposed him to have country who were nor satisfied with their present wages. used. All he then admitted was, that an indirect corn- One of the Petitions he had to present was accompanied niunication had taken place. lie had no letter or per by a letter from the Secretary of tie Society, which son. 1 interview on the subject, but a letter written by a consisted of men of twenty dfferent trades, all desirous third person to his friend, was strewn to him (Mr. Can to. emigrate. This Secretary asked him how much ping) in confid.mc: arid fro n that letter he collected n,oney wculd be granted to send ten thou.and Men their sentiments, rf which he made mention upon a out of the country ?. and concluded his letter in the former night. The Hon. Baronet was greatly mist .ken following words,, !' perhaps it will be interesting if he supposed th.t letter to be the only on: he received to you to know' that our market of yesterday was containing offers of support. He would be greatly 'cry good t re, the best we have had a long mortified 'could he see them all. He received them 1 I L. It 4 I 111' tel 41140111 . I ....% daily, but the Hon. Baronet had no right - to ask gm" from whom. He could " shew his eyes and grieve his heart' with the number. With:respect to the other questions ;of the Hon. Baronet, "he would adopt the advice of the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Calveri) and not answer one word, not that tflete were not more in the House, who as well as himself could answer them, but because be was desirous that they should come to the old, the better, and more Parliamentary mode of pro. ceeding—(Hear). They ought to know who their op ponents were to be. If the Hon. Baronet was not the great phenix of the oppdsitfon, he challenged him to find his compeer whoever he might be, and at once to bring the subject to a Motion—(Cheers). Mr. BROUGHAM said he would recommend to the Honourable Baronet to return to the regular and estab lished mode of Parliamentary discussion. It was not in that place alone that such questions as these were copiously administered; not only were they adminis tered to the House but to the country, for which per haps they were principally intended. It was tight to speak of the absent with due respect; but be could not help lamenting that the prayer they often beard so solemnly pronounced was not as yet completely ful filled—that it had not yet pleased the ALMIGHTY to endue all the Nobility with grace, wisdom, and under standing—(Hear.) The greater proportion, no doubt, were so imbued—nine-tenths at least—but the residue seemed still to want the prayers of the Church. With respect to his Majesty's Government, he should proceed in the course in which he. set out, and continne.notwith- . standing all that had been said by the Hon. Barotiet, to give them his feeble support. Until he heard it from such high authority on the other side of the House, he never concluded that there was any chips inconsistent with the Constitution in persons not connected with the Government tendering their support when -circum stances seemed to them to call for it. Being a friend to the Constitution, though wholly unconnected with the Government; he would continue to support it. He could not help expressing his earnest desire to the Hon. Baronet—it was the desire of the House and of the country—that he would abandon this irregular, unpar: liamentaty, and to a certain degree nisfair and injurious proceeding, though he knew it was not meant so by the Hon. Baronet—(Hear, hear)—that he would come for ward at once with a questiop—(Hear, hear, from S r T. Lethbridge.) He was delighted with that cheer. His mind was relieved by the consent it seemed to imply. Let him name a day for his .motion. Let him at once bring it forward, and let the Government be put to trial by a regular distinct Parliamentary question. He should be delighted to have an opportunity of meeting the Honourable Baronet, and, as a supporter of vernment, he anticipated the result with confidence and pleasure—(Hear.) • Mr. O'NEIL condemned the mode of proceeding adopted by the Hon. Baronet. The opposition as now conducted,- seemed to be either a body without a head, or a head without a body. He heard it observed some time back, that the opposition could be removed from the House in four hackney-soaches. If matters went on as they did, they might ere long be taken away in a vie-a•wis. The Petition being read, and the question put that it be printed, Sir T. LETHBRIDGE said, he should go from the House in any way he pleased, either in a hackney-coach, or a vis-o via. Small as the minority was in which he might stand, he should not be deterred from doing his duty. If he thought the Administration was formed on principles not consistent with sound constitutional prin. ciples, he should sot wait to be joined by others in his opposition to it. He received an answer to one of his questions, but he trusted the Chancellor of the Exche quer would say whether sr not he acquainted his col leagues with the overtures that was made to him ? He must be allowed to entertain his own opinions of that proceeding, and to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer again, as a public man, and a man of honour, whether he made such communication to his colleagues ? Was it a matter of indifference to have received an overture of co-operation from those who for so many years had been his decided opponents in that House? Lord JOHN RUSSELL rose to order. The ques tion before the House was on a Petition, coming from a body of Protestant Dissenters. The Petition having been read, the Hon. Baronet took the opportunity, on the question that it be presented, of going into a variety of observations in reference to a -question to which no answer could, or at least would, be given. He would put it to the Hon. Baronet, whether it was fair to make such statements and commentaries without bringing forward a motion on which his statements and observa tions might be answered? The SPEAKER said he should state shortly what his understanding of the Orders of the House was. He conceived that a Member was bound .to conform his observations as much as he could to the subject matter before the House. It was for the Hon. Baronet to judge how far his observations were in connection with, the question, and it was competent to any Hen. Mem. ber to call upon him for an explanation as to the ie:e vancy of his speech. Sir T. LETHBRIDGE said it was not his intention to bring his observations to bear upon the Petition-1 (Hear). But it had been the uniform practice of the House to put questions when a Petition was presented. Sir R. WILSON said the Hon. Baronet acknow ledged that his observations were not intended to bear upon the Petition. As a representative of the people, he must prote.t against this interruption to the public business. Sir T. LETHBRIDOE said he wished to confotin to the opinion of the House and of the Chair. He could take another opportunity of expressing his senti ments, but it occurred to him, that it was consistent with order to take the opportunity, when a Petition was presented, of offering any observations that a Mem ber might think important. As the House and the Chair seemed of a different opinion, he should rot per severs. He must, however, consider himself as having been very hardly treated. Mr. CANNING said it might be convenient to the Hon. Baronet to know, and he should now solemnly re peat, that he would nit answer one single word relativz to the late transactions,. unless the subject were brought forward in the sit ipe of a motion. He must, however, protest against th • course l u $ red by the Hon. Mem ber of taking aivantage of his no answer, to put an answer into his mouth—(Hear). That the Hon. Baronet had no right to do— (lis The Petition was ordeleJ to be printed. LATE WESTMINSTER MEETING. Lord EBRINGTON ps esented a Petition from a Gen tleman narned 4 Tucker, a 11 ctos of Laws, complaini, g that the High Bailiff of Westminster bad refused to call a Meeting for the purpo e of addressing the King on the subject of the new Admiuistratkon, and in comp i an with the requisition of Certain of the inhahitat.te, The Petitioner further complained. that the Meeting held on the 14th May last was interrupted by the 111,14 Constable, Mr. Lee, and many of those who attended were grossly abused. lie should abstain from giving Any opinion on the merits of the Petition. Ile must say, however, that, from what he always understood of the character of the High Bailiff, he would 1 9 r order the to address dispersion of the meeting unless be considernedr.hsifen:rii—, authorised by circumstances to do se. He must, host. ewer, regret that any circumstaAces could have atiseisli call for such a proceeding. Mr. HOBHOUSE said he had a cons municationftem * Mr. Morris, which was a complete answer to the ant:, gations of the Petition. The answer of to the first chargeghwas, that the terms of the requ.sitioe.,-, did not authorize him to call the Meeting. It p urported • • to be for the purpose of calling a meeting the King, without stating on what subject. Mr. M o m * thought very properly that he should not have been left' - ' to guess the object, and he sent a very c i v il answer to that effect. The letter received in reply from the Learned Civilian, Mr. Tucker, commenced in these words : " Your refusal appears to me in so hideous a fo r m." With respect to the second charge, of dispersing the Meeting on the 14th, the High Bailiff denied that he gave any orders to that effect, or took any part in it directly or indirectly. The fict was, that the Meeting was interrupted in consequence cf orders from the Come missioners of the Paving Ward. As one of the Mem bers for Westminster, he must say that the inhabitant s . - were hardly dealt with. They were precluded by an Act of 1816 from meeting in Palace-yard; and now the Commissioneis of the Paving Board excluded them from Covent Garden, in compliance with the Act of Mr. Michael Angelo Taylor. After a few words from Lord &Immo, the Pruden was or. tiered to lie upon the Tables.. The Assize of Bread Regulation was read a fint time, and ordered to bo read a second time to-morrow. DISSENTERS. .'fir. DENISON said, he held in bin hand from the Protestant Dissenters of Clapham, the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts. take that opportunity of observing, that Baronet (Sir T. Lethbridge) continued to proceed course he had for some time been pursuing, ' reduce the OppOsiiion as low in point of number recollected it to have been some years back. name signed to the petition was that of a Cler& the Church of England, and one-third of the - were of the Established Church.(l-lear.)--Tr wish to press the question at present, but tt sircits to shew the House in what manner , 'all denominations should live together. H. press his regret that the Right Hon. Gentleman Canning) had expressed himself so decided] subject, wishing, as far as he could, to Government and that of his Hon. Friends joined hind. The Right Hon. Gentleman it the most effectual way of providinglor fame, and securing the good opinion of the giving equal rights to die Protestant Dissent England and the Roman Catholics of Irc' system of judicious and temperate reform, rigorous attention to economy. If ' should be conducted on these principles he I. to scorn any opposition, however elevated high in station, or powerful from influence. not then regret the secession of his late colic were half a century behind the present age Lion, liberality, and intelligence.—The Petition and ordered to be printed. Mr. WILMOT.HORTON presented Petitions oration Committees of Blackburn and Manchester, r.; Petitioners might be assisted in emigration.—Referred ' gration Committee. . . Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN presented a Petition Bakers of the Eastern part of the Metropolis against t' pending fur regulating the sale of Bread.—Ordered t ADMINISTRATION 01 JOSTICS. Mr. PEEL said, that before moving the f Day for the further cbnsideratioa of the Re, Larceny Laws Consolidation Bill, he trusted would pardon him for a slight breach of inn moving for leave to bring in a Bill for the ministration of Justice. He did not apprehend would meet with any opposition. The Bill upon the supposition that Many of those ' used in the administration of justice were that they might, and ought to be altered. -- state shortly what were the alteration, propint•di present when a person wsh put Upon trial, not guilty, he was asked haw he would be tried. I must see that such a question *as quite unnecessary. effect of it was, in most cases, to puzzle and confuse and the answer was given sometimes to a way quite with the gravity and decorum that was to be desired' Justice. It was expected that the answer should be ' country." It was sometimes given with great total disregard to the import of the words, or it was c the gaoler to the prisoner, or very often the gaoler for him. Was there any necessity for retaining sat' When the prisoner entered the plea of not guilty better that the trial should proceed without asking .wished to be tiled? The next improvement he pose was one of somewhat greater importance. if s person stood mute and refused to plead, the _ whether he was mute from obstinacy, or the visitation and if mute from obstinacy, be was then considered =lart was passed accordingly. He thought, fp a , would be better tO presume that the prisoner i piggy, and proceed to trial, than to have him declared I asateres passed without any disclosure of the facts. very severe punishment was the consequence of refuting The person so refusing was exposed to what was called , et dare. Mr. Justice Blackstone eonameosiod the law, which provided that, in place of this ipeci.s the person who was mete from obstinacy should be. and sentence passed accordingly. He should think much mote to the honour of the hies to consider is having pleaded not guilty, and allow the trial' Since the time of Goo - ge 111. there were two 1 in 1777, and another in 17911, of persons having bee and suffered capitally, who were mute from obstinacy , be far more satisfactory if conviction and execution toll' a disclosure of the facts of the case. The third alteration propose was rather of a technical nature. At present, tresses if the prisoner persisted in challenging more than the law allowed him to challeoge, he exposed r coovicilin. It woad be better to alter the law so ledges, beyond the number allowed by law, should I and void. The fourth alteration he should propose that no former attainder should he pleaded in bar of a He int Wooed a clause in the Bill, the effect of et to dispense with the useless formula of calling upon inquire concerning the land and tenements of the r of treason. The sixth, which was the most importau. would have the effect of abolishing Benefit of Clei.S. almost unnecessary to offer any reason for doing - this. It seemed to be nothing more than a solemn use troduee into every Act of Parliament, having refesence the nerd* declaring that the guilty person shall auger dc benefit of clergy. Even at any time it seemed a very 5 policy, that persona should be entitled w sty peculiar front the circumstance of their having larva educated. %ended that the alteration now proposed should extend of ,o:iesy, anti be could not think that the Peers would p aticulatly as al clause had been introduced some tint they NU, placing the Clergy, ou the same footing is rendering them liable to whipping and imprisonme , the capital crimes to which the L3a6 ii, urvuut. till a I dill' del tit . UP' • 1 sow cesi As god de gffi Iswt : wad be a shot N Petition was o r . area 51. d a first time, and beim 'and a Petition into lam, playing for • 7 Acts. He must met 'at if the Hon. ordt o proceed in the of 1 ping, be would jest if numbers as be and back. The fhst nest a Clergyman cf of the petitioners )...-They did not at they were dr. oer Christians of , He must et. lentleman (NIL idedly upon this , to support his iends who had man would 6od ors glor his foture at C t the countty,by it Dissenters of f Ireland, by a T 1 'oral., and by a .don" sic Governmert a he might laugh !voted in rank, lien . ience. He need colleagues, who Dan] pes age in civilize. s pa Petition walnut p al P 4 pa Limit from the bd. 4 pet 'ter, praying t h at the 4pm ieferred to the Erna Leal s Petition from tie Eras against the Bin Den D o , erect to be pri.ani. Colo rice. Ditti the Order cf the Do he Report of the BY rusted the House of irregularity is - F 6 ' n w the better ad. per I pprehend that it 77f. e Bill proceeded ose forms now sere unnecessaryi Ii !red. He should • proposed. woo 161, and pleaded ssbj J. now the House .43 cesury. The outy 'ape online the prisoner, y quite inconsistent 'mired in a Court of frail id be " By Goo ad tea l great levity, soda n i t e it ing w ga usil a o t i s l yu e i c r ti hw il a aa eBl n s i f ts ia 7 m, red b l r ? e ' s ej i ettp sating him how he nt he should Vint La nce. At previa; to km • the question now Lind e visitation of Goo? tleo- moldered pull , aid and he, Ifi a ease sl reamer pkadcd Taw declared guilty, aroi 111 t facts. Formerly. letter f refusing ro pkad• as called Penitjartr. bfki the of the be rd a of punishment. Arm. d be declared guilty, disth think it would be onside the prisoner 13 trial io pnweed. — two wawa, we frog log been convicted 1111 bittosci. It would alion tonowed upon the alto ation he should tarp present, io CaW , A , g more of the Jeri • . posed himself +o • iv , in that ad chi? mid be declared lad P• el pow in the Hill ens. Berl sr of any indictment. t of which would be upon the Jura 41 +ei the person sena nponaut al cc 2 so ld abco r doing avtai ends to t and dal of oh liia : mnut pec u r riwca e ! Q: C "sc r ru nieumec niiyi d c ; : e rg i ut : uo t k b : i is oza t itd ri : lt sw i l cim l it l. c t ., t i l l i ii i t !:: : alto le time bacainadn icing as ,al.ersi suul risonnitst.•' la ad moo aught 1.4 huntst _ s