Star. — London, England, 1829-03-31 00:00:00

~- - . . . - 6 Ise A ra Y l -- " , U, •of >, ;a, • 4. I t ° „a •- . . • ' 0* •./ ek. G A 4 , % . I = l l4l • &I i t at., ...• (. • . .' ; „~.. TUESDAY EVENING, MARCH 31, 1829. NUMBER 13,131.] PAWS SEVENrENCS. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. —..io,— also. that oenain pencils be mentrooned to give evidence, in rela tion to the Coal trade. on the day after Baster.—Ordered. The Bishop of LLANDAFF routed for several Returns relative to the Land•tas.—Ordered to be laid en the table. Adjourned at a Qualms& so Sem o'Cuocc. FIRE INSURANCE. .riIHE following Offices having given up the Bn a- dome of Fire Insurance, els. the Albion, the Beacon, the • small Commerdal, the Eagle, the Hope, the East Kent, the Gl:master and Worcestershire, the Old Bath, the Surrey, awn, and "Southwark Persons lately insured therein, will emerally insuke into the advantages and durability of any Office ,to which they may spin entrust their protection. We, the under_ deed Agents in the vicinity of London, therefore confidently Amite attention to the COUNTY FIRE OFFICE, of KMn'r .aesere, which it will be found has, for a Series of Twenty-one Years, yielded unprecedented benefits, and to which they may transfer their Insurances without any additional expense. Returns of £25 and MO per Cent have been invariably paid to all Insured In the Cavalry Faux Ornce, an advantage to the Public which has not been realised by any other Once existing. 1% Webb, Urentford W. Eur, Popier G. Lever, Cantles Town Taft and Mason. Regent's Park G. Miles, Chelsea Basin R. !gimbal', Capon P. Perry, ditto, Albany street T.'P. Burford, Hackney T. Mngle,&epney Gunby, Hampstead S. Harrison. Newington Butts T. Doswell, IsUnetots C. Owed, Camberwell G. Grititith Peotoovills Purcell and Co. Batten's . T. Meredith, Paddington It. Adams, Greenwich HOWARD'S ILLUSTRATIONS OF SHAKSPRARIL This day was published, la octavo, price Twelve Shillings, and in quarto, on India paper, price one guinea, •Twrwrr gl$411•111M1s (accompanied by Quotations and Descriptions) Illustrative of " Two Gentlemen of Verons," and " Love's Labour's Lost," being No. XII. of . THE SPIRI of the PLAYS of SHAKSPEARE: .A. a sinks of Outline Plates. eabibiting the Story of each Play. Dtawn sod Engraved by FRANK HOW A RD,tand Dedicated, with Permission, to Sir THOMAS LAWRENCE, P.R. A. London: Printed for T. Cadell, Strand (Bookselkr to the Royal Academy); C. J. G. and F. Rivington, Sc. Paul's Church yard and Waterloo-vises, Pall-mail ; Baldwin and Cradock. Pa ternoster-row ; and J. Booker, New Bond-street. To be bad also of Mt. F. Howard, No. S, Newman street, Weed street. alp Two Volumes of this Work are now complated, containing Two Hundred Plates. This Weak will not oateed beyond Twenty- See Numbers. RING WORM OR SCALD HEAD. DOWEII'S ALOPECIAN ; or. Fox Ointment. The JI Alopecia° complaint, or falling off of the Hair, is thus de signated by'the Proprietor and Inventor of this infallible remedy, from the ling Worm in the human specks so nearly resembling a complain it Fosse, which occasion their Hair to fall off in the same manner. The %wow of this Preparation has for the last ten years curt d several hundreds of Persons gratuitoody, until the demands has. become 7 - s:i temise% that he foci it a dety that he owes to bins wit, Ms sod the sillicand. is give publicity. Letters thanks, fur the core of several respectable persons, are placed in the hands of He•srs. Batley,. and may be seen on application. hold in pets at his. 94. and 411 6d. by Messrs. Butler, Chemists, Cheaptide, comer of St. Paul's, London; Sackings-greet, Dublin; Princes street, Edinburgh; and the principal Deakts in Patent Medicines. FRENCH PAPERS. FROM THA OAXIITTZ Dle• IMAMS, MARCH 29. SMYRNA, FIIMIO•SY It. SZIO•OP OP • PIMPS LOTTO& The news which we have from Constantinople is old, but if the wind favours the vessel which is to bring you this letter, it will reach you before the null. The following are the most interesting particulars known here : hi. Jaubert =admits to see the Reis Rand( from time to time, but these interviews are uninteresting, and will be so till the return of the answers from - Paris and London. The Porte hopes that the representatives of the Courts of France and Ragland will be sent to Constantinople or some place in the vicinity to cane to a Anal arrangement. It is supplant that 'hada, entirely occupied by attention to its own interest, has aareed that the affairs of Greece *hall be treated by the two Pleuiputentiariest it has promised its assent to whatever may be deft, and we do not see any thing to oppose this arrange ment. It is stem thought that when this arrangement is once made, It will inimsdiately lead tea mediation between the two belligerent Powers. Meantime the preparations continue; troops are daily arriving from Asia and great quantities of 'cannon and ammunition are emtsarked, and sem to Rodosto, to lenity several points on the Sea of Marmara and on the side of Adrianople. Coen daily becomes more scarce and very dear. The calculations which certain pee sous have made to prove the impossibility of starving Constantinople, may not prove very correct ; however, the Porte has just taken a Measure by which it is expected to relieve this scarcity. The fol lowing is the translation which has just been sent me of the agree oleos between the Stiebiebat Naziri and the Austrian and Sardinian merchants— " Hi. kscellertey the Stichiebat Nash', 'Minister of Stare, for the admini-tratiou of provision*, on the one hand, and the Aus trim anti Sardinian merchants on the other, have made a con vention between them, by which the price of the wheat, called armlet, that is to say hard, of Taganrock, bas been hod at ten piasters pet kilo; that of the hard wheat of Odessa and Ismail at nine ; that of the wheat called Bomar, or soft, of Odessa, at 0 1 ; and iii it of the soft wheat of Ghlasierri, at 7/. It has also betas egrerti, that on the vessels arriving at Constantinopk, no sward should be paid to the greater or lesser amount of the **pees of done ships; that one should be discharged here, and the other have ptratiasino to pass into sea of hlarmora ; and that, kdsproilently of the vessels with cargoes, which, in consequence of this ssraegemeto, she/lull for the Black Sea, the passage shall also be petimit.d to vessels in ballast. This convention having been approved 'of by his ExceUency the Reis Effendi, this teskire kat leen delivered " The accounts just received from Eska announce that two Rua- Sian ships of the line and two frigates are goes to cruise of Candia, Rhodes. and Ales odria to intercept all convoys from Egypt.— This will render matters more complicated ; for Russia is either a belligerent or toot. If she is um, she Might to conform to tbe.Con vendee of the teds November, and leave Candia free ' if, on the contrary, she wielders herself as the belligerent , and hav ing a right t o employ Wpoesthle mean!' to injure her eoemy, there am be sooting better than for her to employ sU ber efforts to prevent limpt from ioding troops and 'corn to the Sultan, but she has nething to do with Candid, which it was agreed to kris free, and WI" was beginning to. submit. The Greeks, seeing themselves song li t aPrfpli. far from scorning to order. will put ewer, tili n g es A r t,L l tieved. and occasion reprisals on the part of the Tusks. al de Rigoy was to go to Rena to see the President ; but mow k h est know* where he wiU go, for it seems that the Pre& f tilt I t 0 41 ti Navaris to hook at about 1.000,000 d francs, which bs knows has arrived there; sad which are to be delivered to hint.' 16 " 114:21 r, hi M. Ach Rogan, the new Representative of France %we. If, as is probable. the sew blockade by the Russians "f Wins. the Admiral may perhaps go to Soda. We shall mei. "'~etef.lt is certain the horizon becomes very gloomy. 11111411 1k _ Me ace IS —Five per Cents.lo/&*k. )4,1Z" Per Cents. 79f. 3.5 e. 30c. aSs.-- Bank Actions, 40311 f...- Kates, 114 f. GO& 50e. 4Scoysl Spanish Loan, OHO $314 -To Rau liacbeaa. tv Perpetuate, 521.--Haytian Lose, - - • 411 Logsdon, one month, Mb 330. Three nienths,ll64lUM HOUSE OF LORDS. MARCH 30. Lord Srasumr. and other Members from theCounnons, brought up a Road BM. The Earl of HA RDW ICKE presented a Petition from Wis.. beach in favour of Concessions. The Margotls of ANGLESEY presented Petidons for the re moval of Civil Disabilities, from the modes of Down, Ferma nagh, end Cork. the Serf OCiV I NCH I LSIZA presented Petitions from New * Romney, the Mayor and Aldermen of Rochester, Burling, Paul Deptford,Addington, and several other parishes in the county of Kent. Also Petitions from Newberry, Berka, Dumblayne, the county . if Ross, the county of Renfrew, Kincardineotherdiren, Leeds, Brydon Chapel, London, the county of Tyrone, and many other parts. The Petitioners all prayed that no further Concessioa be made to the Roman Catholics. Lord CA W DOR presented a Petition from Certain individuals in the county of Pembroke In favour of the Catholics. In doing so, be begged to state, that at a County Meeting a Clergyman of the Established Church made a most unwarrantable attempt to agitate the mind of the people of that county. On the hosting% he stated that the present measure would be to admit Popery into the Constitution, and the Protestants would be compelled against disk Indittedost to support Popery. The admission of Popery would boraothing short of depriving the Protestants of their yeti. Vans liberty. He strongly recommended the inhabitants to peti tion his Majesty to dissolve Parliament, as thee he would see how ill be had been used by his present hypocritical and ill informed Ministers. The most lalammatory and seditious papers bad been circulated in that county, and the worst of them propagated by a Society for the circulation of tracts. The Reverend Gentleman inquired if the people were ready to give up their Bibles? If they were, then they might wisest to the measure; if not, it was their duty to object to it. When the Meeting had heard this Gentle. man and the one who seconded the Resolution, it became so tumid. tuous that the Sheriff was obliged to dissolve it ; and therefore no Petition front the Meeting could be presented as the Meeting of the County. Windows had been broken, and in one instance fire thrown into the houses of those who were favourable to the measure. The present Petition was from a number of Gentlemen who were present at the Mr edits, and who. objected to what took place there, and expressed their approbation of the measure. Lord ELDON observed that he hada Petition horn that counts , signed by a great number of the moat respectable individual; against the Catholic Claims. Lord FARNHAM presented Petitions against granting further coacessiona to the Roman Catholics from Dromore. and two parishes in the county of Sligo ; from Mychon and Donegal, in the county of Carlow; from Kirkball. .in the county of Donegal; from Allway. and another parish in Suffolk; from four united parishes in Durham ; from Ballinahinch, and another parish in the county of Down - from Varney, &rick. Cremore, and two other places in Monag han; from Enniscorthr hod Gorey, in she county of Wezford; from a parish in the county of Tipperary; from two parishes in the county of Cavan • from Kilray, in the county of Londonderry; from a parish in the King's County; from a parish in Cavan; and from Eastley, in the county of Sligo.—Laid on the table. The Bishop of DURHA 11 presented similar Petitions from Bishop Aukiand, and two parishes in the diocese of Durham...- Laid on the table. The Earl of KINNOUL presented similar Petitions from the Ministers, Elders, and Presbytery of Perthshire ; alsO from two other places In that county.—Laid on the table. Lord LORTON presented mu similar Petitions from the coon. ties of Down and Louth.—Ordered to lie on the table. _ _ The Duke of HAIIILTf /N presented Petitions in favour of the Catholic Claims from Greenbam and Hattonshay, I. Renfrew. shire. The Noble Duke expressed his full concurrence , in the peti. tionere prayers, and declared that ever Mace he was a Member of their Lordships House, he bad invariably been favourable to the measure introduced by his Majesty's Government.—Ordered to Is on the table. The Earl of HA REWOOD presented a Petition against the Catholic Claims from Aicourt. in Yorksbire.—Otdeted to lie on the tables . Lord HOLLAND presented Petitions in favour of the Catholic Claims from the Dissenters of a parish in Northamptonshire ; and from another Protestant Saciety.—Ordered to lie on the table. - Earl GROSVENOR presented a Petition from the Sib Menu facturen of Macclesfield, praying that the attention of Patliament may be turned to the state • I their trade, and the system of smug gling produced by the present state at the law. It was Impossible, in the Noble Earl's opinion, to avoid feeling for the distress of these persona. Happily they had been partially relieved by Royal muni ficence in London. but there were other branches of the trade in the manufacturing districts, which called loudly for Parliamentary interference. Lord ELDON presented Petitions from Caroarvon, Forfar, Bangor, the county of Buckingham Dumfries, the Cbapelry of Hadley, in the county of Chester, Ramsey, Lanark. Stirling, the Wesleyan Methodists of Wellingborough, and many other Petitions. all praying that no further COOCeI44OOI be made to . the Roman Catholics. Lord CA LEDON presented Petitions from the county of Tyrone, and other parts, in favour of the Roman Catholics. The Duke of RICHMOND presented a Petition against the Catholic Claims from Mast ()flowed. Earl 6 REY presented a Petition from the Dissenters of Jewin street Chapel, in the City of London, for the repeal of all civil die. abilities applicable to religion. Lord FITZ WILLI A3l presented a similar Petition from Hun. dean. Marquis of LANSDOWN, in presenting a Petition in favour of Catholic Claims from a parish in Wiltshire, adverted to a statement be had made on a former night, of the non-residence of a Clergyman during twenty years. As that Clergyman be longed to the diocese of a Right R if Prelate then so the House. be was desirous of saying he had found upon further in. quiry that the individual had not been non resident more than twelve years. With respect to another tact he had stated, he be lieved it correct; namely, that there had been a considerable in• crease of the number of Roman Catholics and Wesleyan Meth°. discs in the parish to which the Clergyman belonged. The Noble Marquis expensed a ii-pe that the Right It d Prelate would attend to the interest of the parish, and see that they bad a resident , Clergyman. Vie Bishop of BR ISTOL said, the individual in question had resided on and off as the incumbent of the living during 40 years, and in that time he had discharged the duties of a Clergyman and a Magistrate in the most satisfactory manner. The Marquis of LANSDOWN then bid the Petition, which was from White parish. in Wilts, en the table. and observed. be had found it necessary to mention the subject again, in order to put the Right Reverend Prelate in possession of the bets. The Noble Marquis then presented petitions in favour of Concessions from the inhabitants of &. Paul's, Dublin, and from the Roman Catholic inhabitants of Londonderry. Lod FARNBOROUGII, in presenting a Petition from a pa rish in Cardigan, against the Roman Catholic Claims, said that he was opposed to these Claims—he thought that to audit Roman Catholics to political power would be attended with imminent danger. He was not In general opposed to the measures of Isis Majesty's Ministers—in the present case, however, be was deeld. edly of another opinion. Lord PLUNKETT presented a Petition is favour of Cations sion, from the resident Magistrates of the county of Water lint Out of thirty-dve Magistrates it had been signed by twentrosso. He begged to call the attention of the Howe to one statement ems tanned in the Petition—that was, that the county from which k had come Was in a state of the utmost quietude. whilst in an ads Joining eoutry, where each Petitions had been less frequently heard of, all was disturbance. ford LONGFORD. presented a Petition against the Bill now in progress for removal .of Roman Catholic diaabi sties from coy . taia of the inhabitants of the tows in Longford. Lord HOLLAND, in reference to that Petition, said, that if it were a Petition &plait the Bill now in progress in the other House, it was certainly irregular. inasmuch as no BIU of that nattier was yet before their Lortisbipe. • - Lord LONGFORD, in explanation. said that the Petition was purely one VIM granting any further concession to the Roman •Catbolies. Lord FALMOUTH peasuitod a sitailar Petition from the In habitants of East Lao. Lord GOUT presented a Petition for the removal of Catholic disabilities, iron a parish in Galway. lArd KENTON proanted Petitions against Concession from the ishahhaligo of Woodchureh, is Cheshire, and Conway, in Cars tP lr f ess - Lord LONDONDICRRY moved fo Immo of AAR Coals horned deebt sbe las us rot, sad did dity paid chum sent Wei • tot the t. no Inca, ity of )ttM reel log.►H tie"• r app 41 at die Bistot p , witl ad tbi Few D. r agg", r E 66 ' Nodo Air* 1 404 4; 10 iner- . Awl be re AO 144 411 1141111.11 r---- tar. HOUSE OF COMMONS. lane conversation UPS is consequence of Sir Rawson Knew sou. presenting a Petition frees the Proprietors of the Odiat. Canal Navigation, praying to be beard by Omni viliotie Warwick and Knapton Canal BM The Beessraili lbreaut suggested the withdrawal of the Bill In question ; bat Mr. Lawutv said be wu not authorised to withdraw the BM; and after a few obsereitioet from Mr. Ihraaass Booms, the redden was laid on the tibk. The farther consideration of the Report of eke Liverpool Church Sill was postponed till Thursday next. A Petition was presented from Hackney in favour of the lode peedettt Gas Compan y's Bill. which was laid on the 'Alt.—The, BM was tbenrasecond time and ordered to be committed. Several Petitions were presented from towns in the line of the Osford Canal on the subject of certain toils, which are affected by the Warwick sad Knapton Canal Bill. The Staines Bridge Amended Bill was read a third time and passed. • Petitions were presented against Roman Catholic from the following places: The Wesleyan Methodists o ßga rg eellis ilmos borough ; the Curate and Parishioner. of Dwell, in Leloseno. shin; from Mr. Thomas Jones, Vestry Clerk of St. Seeping.. Coleman-street; several parishes in Yorkshire; Episcopal Chapel of St. Giles's. Loaders ; Birseall, Cleveland ; fleydoo, Orsett, and setae other places in Hears; Belfast; Presbytery y of Forfar; Kir baldy ; Tottenham Court Chapel, Finedon; several parishes in Lanarkshire; Beatings; the Clugy of Worcester; the Clergy and lalmilitants of Saint Andrew Auckland, in Durham ; several pa lhhlPS In Southampton ; Denbigh ; Somerford, is Wiltshire ; Su. thoebodskire ; Broseley, in Salop. Sir H. SM YTH presented a Petition from the Physicians and Surgeons of the Eastern pan of Eastit,praying for some Legislative measure for supplying subjects fur anatomical purposes. On presenting a Petitim from Bandbach, in Cheshire, against any further concessions to the Roman Catholics, by Mr. Eantavon. several observations were made by Mr. Davaumae. to the effect that great pains had been taken to procure signatures; that even the boatsmen and whipper-in of a pack of hounds near Knutsford, had been induced to alga it. Petitions were pretested in favour of Roman Catholic Eman cipation from . several residents at Bath; Ballyegan t in Queen's County; several parishes in Galway, Tipperary ; Roman Catholic Clergymen of Ireland; Ailaborough; Rely, in Tyrone; Stirling; Leith, near Edinburgh; Banff, in Fifeshire; Perth; Unitarian Chapel in Stamford street, &niftier., Surrey; Market Raisin; several Parishes in Galway. Kildare, and King's County. Sir R. H. IN G LIS, on presenting a Petition from Forfar against Roman Catholic Rataocipatlon; took occasion to observe that • Petition bad been received from the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, and bad been presented on the ad of May. 1770, therefore there could be no objection to the receiving this. Tbe Petitioners quailed the prayer of the Petition by requesting that Roman Catholics might not be admitted to certain sates in the State, and that the number might be restricted to one third of the persons bolding offices, and in Parliament. , Mr. A BERCROMBY said the Petition was, in fact,in favour of Emancipation; and ought to be received as such. Sir R. H. INGLIS presented other' Petitions from the Synod of Kirkaldy, and other places, to the same effect, which produced some conversation—in which Sir R. Fasauses Captain Weems, Mr. Rom, and an Honourable Member too k part—in which it was Contended that the feelings of the people of Scotland bad not been netted upon the question of Emancipatioa. Mr. HUME denied that the majority of the people of Scotland were opposed to Emancipation, as the Hon. Baronet (Sir R Inglis) had asserted. On the contrary, only a few paltry places had shown * any opposition to the question. Sir IL INGLIS said the paltry places referred to were Edin- burgh, Stirling, Aberdeen, and several other plum. The SPEAKER, with reference to the Petition from the Synod of Kirkaldy, said he bad to take the sense of,the House upon it. The Honour.•ble Baronet had alieduailmn the. A' ,a l ett from the General Assembly in 1770. now he (Sir K. Inglis seemed to infer that the Petition just preset) ed from the Presbytery, and only signed by one person, must be taken in the same manner as the one from the General As-entbly in 1770. He wished, therefore, to take the opinion of the House as to the manner in which it ought to be received, and bow inserted in the Jouruals. The LORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND thought the Peti tion ought to be received as that of the higher Court, the Synod. Mr. Secretary PEEL said the question was, whether it ought to 'he received as the Petition of the individual or the Synod ? Now, itremived as the latter, there would be no check to attempts at Iwo* upon the House. For instance, supposing 16 had been against the Petition, and 17 in favour, and the Moderator had signed it, it would pass as the act of the whole body. when in truth k was only the Petition of a very small majority. He thought pre sidents should be followed. Sir R. H. I NGLiS had referred to the Petition of 1770 as a I mre in point, and thought the Petition ought to be received as the Petition of the body or Synod. Mr. C. WYNN did not see why Petitions in all cases signed by one person should be received as the Petitions of the body. it signed by one person only. It was desirable that in all cases Pe titions should only be received and have weight attached to them according to the number of signatures. To avoid precedints was to strike at the privileges of the House, which he was most anxious to sut• Mr p . D por OUGLAS thought the case referred to by the Right Honourable Gentkman (Mr. Wynn) had no bearing upon the present. Sir J. MACINTOSH thought the question was one of usage, which the House ought to adhere to in the present case. The SPEAK ER wishes] to take the pleasure of the House, whether the Petition should be entered on the Joutekli, leaving the question open for further consideration.—Tbe Petitions were then laid on the table. A Message from the Lord. announced that their Lordships had agreed to certain Road Bills. Sir J. MACINTOSH presented a Petition from certain Ro. man Catholic Clergymen in Ireland, complaining of the Clauses in the Bill for the Relief of the Roman Catholics, which relates to Monastic Order. of Sesults. Lord F. L. GOWER presented a Petition from the Physicians and Surgeons in Down, in Ireland, praying fur some Legi.lative enactments in f of procuring Subjects for Anatomical purposes. Sit 9. U RRA Y presented a Petition from certain hilts& tants of Nova Scotia, in favour of_ Roman Catholic Emaocipa. hon. The Hon: Baronet hoped that the feelings which had been shown in the old country upon the subject of religious toleration, would never reach the Colonies, to light up the torch of bigotry, which had created so much ill will, and destroyed unanimity. Mr. LA BOUCHERE agreed in the sentiments expressed by the lioa. Baronet. Mr. TEN N YSON postpaid his motion respecting the Borough of Rut Retford, which stood for to morrow, until Tuesday, the 7th of April. The Honourable Member too k the opportunity. in presenting the Petition from Market Raisin in favour at Roman Catholic Emancipation, to declare (in contradiction to the assertion of - an Hon. Member) that the majority of the inhabitants of Lin colnshire were favourable to Emancipation. Colonel SIBTHORPE, in answer to this declaration, said, that an attorney's clerk had been using undue means to obtain signa tures to Petitions in favour of Emancipation. A Roman Catholic Clergyman, named Simpkls, had also been indefatigable in pro curing similar signatures. Sir W. ING LUDY denied 'bat the people of Lincohubire veers unfriendly to Emancipation. For himself, Sir W. Ingkby said, he had abstained from using his influence, either one way or the other, in the parishes in which be had any emersion. Colonel SI BTHORPE assured the House that he also had not used any undue leluence to procure Petitions against Ensameiguis= Mr. HENRY GRATTAN, in presenting a Petition Soma the Roman Catholic Bishop and Clergy of the Diocese of Deseme, in favour of Roman Catholic Claims, observed that Cadman Pea lates could not renounce/the titles of Bishops, for Mimi they were to all intents and purposes, and the &II before the Mime could sot deprive them of those titles. The Ham More= Shen alluded to seditious placards that were circulated throughout London. purporting to proceed fro= the Lord Mayne and km* of the City of Dublin; he bad received a letter frees die Lod Mayer, denying any knowledge of these placards. The lien. Member Funned• several other Pedalo= to the same elm MS different parts of Ireland. Lord JOHN RUSSELL presented a Pell*, SO ll=. WSW effect Irani Huntingdon • as did Alderman Weimar= kola M Perish of St . . Stephen, Huntingdon; street. • hlr. HENRY MAX WiCLL predeitted Mims from, sad Dowspatriek, In the county of Down; teem Kildare, Rath- souilagls. a Parish to the county of Salop ; Inch. in the county of Dublin. and several other parts of Irela■d, against further Con cessions to the Roman Catholics. A similar !ethics was presented from Holdbridge. by 111r.Cmte. 011111111111118 or soma. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, the House resolved itself into a Committee of Supply. On the motion of Mr. BANKER the soot of £19,18S was granted for tile BM* Museum. far the year 1829. The Report was brought up, and ordered to be received to.morrow. IVIIIAN CATHOLIC RELIEF BILL. Mr. Secretary PEEL moved the (Weep( the Day fur the third reading of the Roman Catholic Relief BM The bran Laea put, The Matquisof CHANDOSreas and said—ln rising to object to the motion just put to the House I hope I shall be permitted to trespass upon its attention for a few moment., inasmuch soli may. perhaps, be the lag tint • I Jodi ever be enabled to ripest my sentiments relative to a measure undoubtedly of so much impor tance to the best interests of the cow t• y. Sr, I confess that, after all the areuwents I have heard from the Right Honourable Gentleman opi °site, and frau: the many Honourable Gentlemen by whom he has been supported, I have not yet heard a dill, argument ad vanced that has induced me in the slightest degree to alter my opinion, that this measure, which we are now • ailed upon to pass, does not only break in upon the Constitution as established in 1688, or that by passing it we shit.' commit a grievous ant serious inroad uoon the Protestas.t Constitcion as it now riots in these 'calms. Sir, it is not for me to combat with the ptivate minions of any Honourable Member; but 1 trust the House will give me credit for being actuated by fair and honourable motives in having, humble indigo fuel as I am. stood before them as the defender of the Pao testant cause. and in having declarei that I can see no reason why this cau e should be weakened in this coon. ,try. Sir, in common with many Honourable Friends, have deeply deplored the loss we have sustained by . the defection of our once great leader upon this ques• tints, and of the many Honourable Members who have heretofore invariably vi ted with us. It is for him and for them still to tell us their reasons byshich they have been governed. I have listened to their opinions de clared again and again in this House, yet tiros- reasons I have not yet been able to ascertain. I cannot vie". without serious alarm, the change dist will take place with sericite to the situation of the Roman CAthol . ca if this Bill should pass into a law ; but I hope, it it Jo pass, that the Roman Catholics, its gaining all they de si•e, all for which they have been so long seeking, will receive the boon with gratitude, and will act in such a way as to lead the Protestants to place confidence in them. and that they will hereafter maintain and obey the laws of the country. They cannot be ignorant, n r can we be ignorant, of the teasons why they have ricer% reduced to the situation in which they have been snag placed ; and I oust in Got: we shall not fled it aPaht• necessary to teplaie them there. I hope the Catholics will receive tars measure, if. it become a 10,11 4 .2: dutiful subjects; bet I also hope 'het, it they do not so ieceive it, the Pentestifit popolatien will cis a man, and demand its repeal. I must alsa hope that, after this law Shas poised, all angry and acrimonious feelimrs a ill at once end. F-ir my ow n part I will say. that I never entered upon the discussion of th•s subject frosts personal motives. I entered upon it honestly and conscientiously—(hear)—and I earnestly de ire to look for ward to this country enjoying peace and ercisper ty ; but I much doubt if this rew Constitution will be agt re able to the people of England, and I theiefore prof st Against it—against th..t change in the Britissi Constitu tion which we re now about to make. Sir, I have now discharged my duty to my constituents who sent rn , - here, and I beg to move that this Bill be read a thi d time this day sir months. Mr. G. 0. NIOORE was desirous, in seconding the motion, to offer a few observations to the House. and felt assured that, upon a subject of such vital impos tanci, which they stete..pethaps debating fin the last time, he was entitled to demand the attention ct the House. In the year 1774., when a Bit for the segula• don of Q the; was carried from the House of Commons to the House o f Peers, the great Lord Chatham sic. scribed that Bill as desti uctive of the safeguards placed against the inroads of P :pert', and declared Iris opinion that the Government had no mote right to teeeal such laws w ishout ap,realirg to the people, than they hod to repeal the wed chant of the Bill of Rights. W. en he Mouie) recollected those sentiments of that Mos tsious Statesman, he .considered them now worthy of the d.epest attention, because they ref eried to an Ate ram it of the great. the fundamental princi,rle, of the British constitution; and because I.e then alluded to a Bill in progress through Parliament, which Bill he de clared to be subversive of British liberty. What was it. then, on which Lord Chatham relied as that funds.: mental winciply ? What but the whole series ..t laws that had been enacted against Popish influence fr-m the constabl.- to Members of both Hou-es, and ere S rye reign himself. Those, he said, ought not to he altered with, ut the consent of the British people. The argu nient he (Mr. Moore) would urge in opposition to this Bill was. that the per pie of this country had act b en iven tin eto consider it. They ought to have had a far longer peri , rd fur this purpose. for the subject was one which, of all others, req.rired calm and eeiiberate tonsideration. The course, therefore, that ought to have been pursued was the course u u 11y Fui sued under such eiecumstances, via. to submit the Bill to the House during one Session. then to print and circulate it. and to take it into consideration during another ,Session -- This was the course which the British people bad a tight • to expect. It had been said that the question had beers be fore the British people for the last thi:ty years. This was true. But the question during that petiod was only this—did there exist any danger in aclipitiing.the Roman Catholics to politica,' power? That question bad now materially changed its character. II the ques- Lion simply what it had been, he believed the an. laver would be a nearly unanimous 818 mauve.- But such was not the case. Those who brought the mea sure forward coupled it with the admissiou that there was great danger in concession, but contended that there was grea er danger lobe apprehended if conces sion were withheld. Such was the question that had been recently submitted to the Protestants. Now he (Mr. Moore) contended that we were not in a condit i on to institute the inquiry which that question involved, vie. as to the comparison of danger to be spotlit nded on the one hand and to be averted on the other. We bad not . yet—we could not yet—have obtained se& L cient information upon this subject , nor were we in grate ot mind, to topsider it. .He would call the atten. tion of the House to the pledge given by the H use in This day was published. TILACKWOOD'S EDINBURGH MAGAZINE, Na CLI. for APRIL, 1329. Coursers: I. Ireland in 1529—1 L Mary Melrose. by the &trick Shep herd-114 Bosworth Field—l V. Peter &arofsky, a Tale of Ar menia—V. First and Last. Na 3. The First and Last Appear ance. Mr. H. A. C. &tibbe—Vl. Sketches on the Road m Ire. land Na I—VII. Chapters on Churchyard., Chap. 19—VIII. Lines Written at Warwick Castle. lly C. Radiant M.D. F.R.S. Bsc—lX. Songs of the Affections. by F.H. 1. The Recall. 2. The Indian with his Dead Child. 3. The Two llonses—X. Vernal Invocation, by Delta—ll. ,4 The Breaking in upon the Constitution of tees " 11. Nome* Ambrosiann, No. 42. Printed for William Blackwood, Edinburgh; and T. Cada • Strand. Landon.