Star. — London, England, 1820-06-14 00:00:00

•TO MADAME MARA. ;* BY JOHN TAYLOR, ESQ,. Ah, MA RA, since we ne'er again Shall hear the wonders of thy.strain, . - That gave us inch delight, Leave some memorial of thine art, Which once could move at will the heart, Nor let us leie thee quite! How frail the Songster's, Actor's power ! Conan'd to life's short casual hour— A Gamma charms no more ! He who in Snaasreaaes mighty Muse A potent spirit could infuse That made her higher soar ! And, Malta, 'twas thy peerless praise To give to Hawura's lofty lays A more attractive charm ; To rouse with suergy the soul, Or sooth it with a soft controul, And Erwi l s self disitrin ! Vet Gagner, sovereign of the heart, Borne written record of his art - Might still have left behind, Vurivall'd then through n'ry age, The world had found the British Stage The Mirror of Mankind! And, 144ta.6 1 thou cant well impart • Same lessons of thy tuneful art, To smooth sliir native strain, That Britain's free heroic rase, May hence, adored with gentler grace, AU foreign aid disdain ! SPORTING. • The Gold Medal given by the Thistle Golf Club was played far on Saturday the 3d instant, on Leith Sands, and pined by Mr. JAMS HAT, of Leith, who accomplished two rounds, at sixtrtwo strokes, which may be considered as very great play. Yesterday morning, at sla o'clock. two young Gentlemen, for a wager of £5, walked eight times round Lincoln's-Inn-Fields, on the foot way—the person who performed the task in the shortest time to be the winner. One did it in 47 minutes, the other in an hour and two minutes. Notwithstanding the early hour, many persons were present. FATAL &aut:l.—Saturday evening, as some Irish labourers were returning from wort, in going through Moorfields, a dis pute arose between two of them, named Swift and Lowry, which they agreed to settle by a regular set-to. Several wcßconsested rounds were then fought. The combat lasted for half as hour, when Swift, who was dreadfully beaten, with the Mulct of his second, rave in. He was first taken home by his companions, but in such a distressing state, that be was immediately after wards conveyed to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, when he died on Monday. DavaT•LAWa• Teanrsa.—ln consequence of the accident which occurred to Mr. KZAK on Monday evening, the character of Rembeis Gleamy, in the Co medy of Toes and County, was last night performed b 7 Mr. RAE. He sustained it with much spirit and propriety.—Mr. KEAK was yesterday so lame as to be unable to put his foot to the ground. It appears that he strained the tendon achilles, and may probably be confined to his room for some days. VAnzum.i. GAsunnia.—The above elegant Gar dens were again numerously attended on Monday evening ; and the exertions of Madame SAQVI and her daughter were rewarded with great applause.— humourous song, detailing thepleasures of reading the “ Loudon Newspapers," was sung by Mr. C. TAncia, and met with an unanimous encore. The ftsaworks, by Madame HINGLILL were again of the most brilliant description. Several persons of dis tiuctioa were present, although the unsettled state of the weather diminished the attendance of company. The Marchioness of SALISBURY had not quite so extensive an assemblage on Sunday night, as on some former ones ; a circumstance easily accounted for by the great number of distinguished individuals who divided the Fashionable World with her on that even ing. There were, however, more than a hundred and fifty personages present, and upwards of forty par took of a splendid Banquet. The Noble Family of WESITS and MARCH are making the St. James's Hotel their metropolitan domicile during the present season ; and on Monday night the Countess appropriated all the facilities of that superb establishment to the entertainment of her friends, of whom, noo.ithstanding the many other brilliantfefer of the evening, upwards of three hun dred were present. Soon after ten o'clock the com pany began to arrive, and at eleven Lord &ow and his accomplished sister L:zdy MARGARET CHARTER'S led off the Quadrilles. T::ey were immediately fol lowed by several splendid sets, and never were the moiements of this, Patrician dance displayed more gracefully. The supper was taken standing, and the tables, which were covered with every luxury, were continually replenished throughout the night. Pines, peaches, nectarines and strawberries, with the most delicious ices, were in the utmost abundance. Yesterday no less than sixty penis', male and female, front the ages of fourtr.z to forty, were brought before the Ma gistrates, at Union-liaq charged with being Unpiles . and vaga bonds. In the lower parts of ebe . Borough, more especially about Dover and Kent streets, there are public-homes where weekly Hops are held, attended priccipally by well-dressed rogues and prostitutes. Here IKONS of so ducking and immoral a dercription nightly take place, that the bare recital is enough to ino.pire any one with borer t sometimes lads and young girls, bithe'rto uncontaminated, and unacquainted with the real. cha racter cf the company that frequent such places, attend what they suppos r to be a harmless dance, without the knowledge of their parents. The prisoners, with a very few easepdoes, were al identified as notations thieves and strumpets, and between forty and fifty of them were committed tin the Ilessises. GVILDHALL,...4III,II Wirielln was charged with having obtain. ed goods from Messrs. Howard and Coleman, Chemists and Druggists, No. 9, Cannon-street. On the ith instant, a man of respectable appearance, went to the house of the prosecutors and purchased cochineal to the amount of .€4. di, and di rec t e d i t to be sent to No. 5, Little Love-lane, immediately, and the money should be ready on delivery. It *as sent; and the porter saw the prisoner, who gave him five £1 Dacca of the a Mohan Bank, Beth," dated June, 1810. The notes were each worn, •ag if they 1131 been in extensive circulation. me prisoner re. quired the difference; but the porter, not being satisfied as to+ the notes, said, be would 'hew, them to his muter, andreturn with the change. Upon inquiry, the Bank had failed ten years sir ce. On the return of the porter, both the prisoner and the cochineal had disappeared. It was found that she was am known at Love.lane, - but bad merely been there under the pretence of stoking lodgings; and V 12.11 , then, as she represented, waiting fag brr husband, to see whether he would approve of them. Mom lioward and Co. sent rourOo the other wholesale druggists in I the City, to caution them ogioat the frond ; and, an attempt being made t pon Mews. adli and re. Or Wood -street, a CAA stable was sent, with the'. paged 'erase:4hr the mm, and the prisoner was taken into argot% A asthipe of person attelnded.l t 3 prefer similar charges against the prisone r ; but considerable doubt being rut:mined as to the MUM c the crime, the F rs. soter was remanded. . LAW INTELLIGENCE. . - . • COURT OF CHANCERY, JUNE IS. Al *MARQUIS OF tattatursiitaitv V. THE EXEC OF THE LATE DUKE OF QUIENSEERAH. ' • This waithe petition of the Noble plaintiff, fray ing that it might be referred to the Master, to whom the claims of the legatees. under the will of the late Duke had been referred, for the purpose of inquiring and reporting what sum ought to be detained in Court, for the purpose of indemnifying the Noble plaintiff from any loss he might sustain by leases which had been revived by the late Duke before the original term had expired. Mr. TROWER stated, that it would be necessary for the Noble plaintiff to amend his Petition before his Lordship could hear it, as the words of it were different from the deed of entail ; in the deed it was stated, that the lands should be let on leases at the most reasonable rents to be obtained, and in the Pe tition it was set forth at.the most improved rents that could be obtained. The Lotto CHANCELLOR—The Petition certainly must be amended, particularly as, when the case of these leases was recently before the House of Lords, the question of reasonable rents went under much dis cussion. Their Lordships sent it bat to the Court of Session, to make further inquiry whether any of these leases should be set aside, they being, if my re collection serves me right, 110 in number ?—Peti tion withdrawn. COURT VP KING'S BENCH, JUNE 13• CRIMINAL INFORMATION. THE NINO 11. SIR N. CONANT, COLLINS, OASICILL. AND The defendants are Magistrates for Middlesex ; and in the cosirse off the last Term, Mr. Scaamirr applied to the Coury for a Rule to spew cause why a ' criminal information should not be filed against them, for refusin g to license a certain public-house ; situate in St. John s-lane, Clerkenwell, known by the sign of the Green Man. It appeared from the affi davits, that the house in question was kept by a man of the name of Meeke, that it was an old-established house, and that it had been regularly licensed up to the year 1815. In the course of the year 1815, Meeke, according to his own statement, found it convenient to leave the brewers who had for some time supplied the house (Messrs. Calverts), and to deal with the firm of Mein and Reid, who, in• con sequence advanced to him a sum of money. The beer, however, furnished by Meux and Co. turned out so bad, that the trade of the house began to suf fer: and, finding his draught reduced to two butts per month, he forsook those Gentlemen, and went into the trade of Messrs. Barclays, when his sale in creased rapidly, and shortly arrived at an average of ten butts per month. These dealings with Messrs. Meux and Co. occurred between June and July, in the year 1816; and on the Sd September, in that year, when Meeke, according to custom, attended the Meeting of the Licensing Magistrates, a paper was sent from the Justice-room, containing the names of those persons whose licenses were suspended; and in that list his name was included, no cause for the suspension being assigned. While he was waiting in the ante-room, he saw Mr. Lucas, the Chief Clerk of Mena and Co. who said—" By what I hear, Mr.- Meeke, you will not get your license to-day." Im inediately after, he heard that it had been refused. The licenses suspended went on to what is called the adjourned day of meeting; and, in the interim, two of the Magistrates, Mr. Sellon and Mr. Cottrell, at tended by Mr. Hill, High Constable of the District, visited the Green Man. They objected to the situa tion of a particular door, which led into the bar, and which they supposed to be an accommodation for dram-drinkers, and asked Meeke whether he had let off his beer trade, taking a premium for the same? Meeke denied that he had done so. He had, during the preceding year, entered into a contract with his servant, by which the servant took all the profits of the beer, allowing his master one guinea per butt; I but he did not state that fact to the Magistrates, Meeke then asked, what was the nature of the com plaint against him ? The visitors said, that they had heard no complaint against his respectability, but complained of the spirit-dqor. Meeke promisedthat the door should be closed, and the Magistrates left the house; in a few minutes, however, the High Con stable returned, and told him, that he need nor, at all events, shut up the house until after the adjourned day. Upon the adjourned day, the 16th September, the publican accordingly, being in attendance, was called into the licensing-room, and questioned as to his consumption of beer and spirits. He was then ordered to quit the apartment; as he came out, he saw Sir Nathaniel Conant, who bad not been there, go in, and in a few minutes the High Constable came to him, and said that his licenSe was refused; but that it would have been granted if. Sir Nathaniel Conant had not appeared—adding, that previous to that Gentleman's anival the license had been signed, by two Magistrates. In this situation; Meeke pre pared a petition, signed by the most respectable in habitants or the district; and on the 20th September he waited upon Sir Nathaniel Conant, at the Free masons' Tavern, where he was engaged in licensing the houses in that division ; he complained of the hardship of his case, of which Sir Nathaniel Conant professed utter ignorance, and was desired to attend on the following day, at the Sessions-house, Clerken well. • The license, however, was not granted.-- Upon the nest licensing day, in the year 1817, Meek. again applied to the Bench, and carried with him several respectable persons, who were to give evidence as to his character. One of these persons. however, was stopped by Mr. Collins, who said, "If you have anything to offer against Mr. Make's claTacter, we will hear you ; 4 ' but, if riot, you need not say any more." The application in 1817 was attended with no better effect than in 1816 ; but, while Meeks was attending at the Sessions-house, he fell is with a man named Dell, who kept the sign of the Hat and Feathers, in the Clerkenwell division, and who had been deprived of his license in the year 1816, uptin the same grounds on which Meeke himself had been deprived. At this time Dell was much agitated, and expressed coesiderable doubts as to the result of his petition. Presently, however, they saw Mr. Willis, the managing clerk of Messrs. Meer and Co. and with. him Mr. W. Wigram, one of the partners in that firm. Mr: Willis took a card out of his pocket, wrote the name of Wi upon it , and sent it into the Justice-room. Sirc. in eosant then came out of • - the room, and retired with Mr:Wiaram into xnothei spestaisnt ; and, 'after - the conference) • Mr. Willis stepped up to Dell; and whisaereJ something to him, at which Dell smiled, and appeared pleased. Imme diitely after Dell'iLlicense was-granted. •At this time Dell's house had been doing two butts per month 'beer, and near £4OO per month in spirits,' while Meeke's house had been doing ten butte per month beer, and not more than £ 2O in spirits. There was a house also, within four doors of the Green Man, kept by a person named Temple, the construction of which was still more objectionable (as to the doors) than the house of Meeke had ever been, and which,, Moreover, retailed a more considerable quantity of spirits, and-which still retained-its license. Temple, however, took his beer of Messrs. Meux and Co. A third application in the year 18.18, and a fourth in the year 1819, were addressed to the Magistrates without success. Upon the itateinents contained in these affidavits, which concluded by charging" that the license had been refused to Meeke in consequence of undue influence exercised by the house of Meux and Co. over the Licensing Magistrates, the Court granted a rule Nisi. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL now shewed cause against the Rule obtained by Mr. Scarlett. The present pro ceeding, he said, was not instituted at the suit of Mr. Meeke himself, who had indeed become a bankrupt previous to the last application in 1819, but on the part of a society, which existed in the Metropolis, composed of between 200 and 800 persons, and called The Society of Associated Publicans. The Court had, in all probability, granted the Rule Nisi upon a feeling that the refusals of the years, 1817, 1818, and 1819, were connected with the original refu sal in 1816, and arose out of the same motive.— This was not the case. The refusali had not even been given by the same Magistrates. The cause which originally led to the loss of, Meeke's license was this —llle had, in direct opposition to the law, and to the established regulation, converted his house into a shop for the sale of spirits. In the first place, he had made a private entrance to that part of the house in which those deleterious compounds were sold ; and, in the next place, he had got rid of his beer trade altogether, by letting it, at a certain pre. mium, to another person, who carried it on lade-l 1 pendently of the spirit trade, which was conducted by Meeke himself. It would have been a gross , neglect of duty in the Magistrates if they had suf fered this trick to pass unnoticed. It was illegal in itself, inasmuch as it amounted to a transfer of one of his licenses to' another person ; and it demanded the most immediate attention, inasmuch as it com pletely evaded and rendered a dead letter that most wholesome statute, which precluded any individual from holding a spirit license who did not also hold a beer license. Upon a complaint to this effect, the Magistrates had, in the first instance, withheld the license in question; the subsequent refus als were, as the Court would see, defensible upon a variety ofgrounds. —First, it was by no means crear that person who had so conducted himself deserved to be intrusted with a license ; second, even supposing the grievance to be abated at the time of the application, there was no security that it would not recur as soon as that ap plication should be granted ; and again, it was the custoth of the Magistrates to regard any application, after a house had been closed during twelve months, as an application for a new license altogether ; and at then became their duty to consider how far-, such license was necessary to the public convenience. :la the present case it had been found that -there were already too many houses, without re-opening that of . Mr. Meeke. The Learned Counsel then, after ad verting to the known respectability of the defendants, and the impossibility of attributing to them anything like corrupt intention, proceeded to state the affidavits in reply. The first affidavit of importance was that of the three defendants, in which they negatived the assertion that Meeke had not, upon the first suspen sion of his license, been acquainted with the cause which led to that suspension, and introduced the pa per referred to by Meeke as containing a list of the suspensions, upon which his name did appear, to gether with the alleged reason of the refusal. The re fusal to listen in the year 1817, to the testimony as to the character of Meeke, was justified- upou the ground that against his general character there was no imputation, and that diaracter formed no part of the objection to the renewal of his liceirse ; and the re -grant of the license to Dell, who sold se large a proportion of spirits, was explained by an allegation that the sale was in large quantities to country cus tomers, and not a retail trade in the house. It ap peared, also, that all the Magistrates were not agreed as to the propriety of renewing that license. Sir N. CoNANT then went 9n to state, for himself, that he had no disposition to favour the house of Meux .sod Co. when he voted against the renewal of Meeke's license, or at any Other time. He remelt). land the circumstance of - Mr.Wigrarn's calling upon ilia' I at the - Bessiossehouse • but although he did not recollect the subject of that conversation, helad-ne, hesitation to say that it did in no way concern either thelicenstof Meek or the license of Dell, or that of any other person. The whole body of Licensing Magistrates then stated, that they should have treated any proposal or interference upon the part of any brewer as an in sult to themselves; and Messrs. Sellon and Cottrell, who disagreed with their brethren, and voted for the renewal of Meeke's license, acquitted the defendants of any corrupt motive, and believed that they had acted in what they conscientiously considered the dis charge of their duty. The affidavit of Messrs.. Reid, Wigram, Hunter, and Co. partners in the firm of Men' and Reid, do nied any influence or interference with the Magis trates ; and Mr. Wigram, for himself, stated, that he remembered the circumstance of his calling upon Sir N. Conant at the Sessions-house, but de nied that the conversation which then passed had any reference either to Meeke or Dell, their licenses, or houses. The affidavit of Mr. Lucas, managins-clerk to Messrs. Meux and Co. in the year 1816, admitted his being at the Sessions-house on the licensing day in 1816. He denied, however, any recollection of having told Meeke that his license would be refused. If he did say so, it must have been the effect of what he had heard from common report, and,not the-re sult of any private information upon the subject. . The affidavit of Mt. Willis, .managing -clerk AO Meux and Co. in 1817, admitted his preseucc upon the occasion sworn to by 3leeke in the year 1817 ; but denied any interference with the business licensing. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE put it to Mr. Ecir lett, whether he could, in the face of the,e affidavits, ,sustain the imputation that ;he defendants had :Lieu under the influence of Messrs. Meux and Co. MT. SCARLETT 'bad fro e - ! - .oice but to confess C;2~ .the defendants did most sec( lately deny the cr-m :rt motive ; but he had never )et met with any c;I:e i.; which such a-motive had been admitted. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ObSelved, that the al ~ davits both of Mr. Wigram and Sir N. Conant cc nied, during the conversation nt the S . ,:sser.s.l:ou se in 1817, any mention of either Meek: or Del. Mr. SCARLETT had - nn wish to press the matter against the feelings of the Court. He felt the irur:. lity of such an,attempt ; but there a es-, in the P.C. sent case so many circumstances of sus i icion, tr.,t he could not help believing - that the bre,vers h„, k more to do with the licensing of public-houses tr.. , a they ought to have, or than the law intende.l should have. He wished, at least, to shew that 1: 3 client had grounds for coming before the Coast._ The house in question was the oldest house ia t::e Parish--it was the best conducted in the Parish—ail the respectable inhabitants of the Parish had core forward to prove th - i character of the man and tl:e conduct of the house: the house was shut up, 21:1 the man was beggared. Mr. S. MARRYAT . , on the part of Mr. GaskiZ, stated, that the application, as against his client, must have been founded in mistake. At the last meet ing, the refusal of which formed' the ground 's( the present proceeding, Mr. Gaskill had not been present. The LORD CHIEF JusrlcE.—The mistake of the applicant has induced the Court to giant a re :e against Mr. Gaskill, which _certainly ought net to have been granted at all: as against that Ganlermm, therefore, the Rule must be discharged a ith costs.— As against the other Gentlemen who ate deiencar4,, the Court is of opinion that the Rule should be di charged, but without costs. We are inclined to aster: this course, because it appears that, upon two -I censing days, in 1816 and in 1817, the managing- Clerk of a brewer was present. Now this is a circum stance calculated to excite suspicion : it has excitel suspicion in our minds, and might well excite si:-.71- cion in the mind of the applicant. I should 'also Say, thatit strikes as as highly improper that at a meet. ing held for the liceming of pubiic-houses, Sir N. Conant should have left the room for the purpose LI speaking to a hrewer.Riile discharged. THE SING CARLILE. A motion was made by Mr. IiOLLAND, oil the part of the Sheriff of Middlesex, for a Rule, why an (M -eer, of the natne of Hopwood, shoutd not be ailowed to keep in his hands - two sums, of ICS and 1.:23, being part of a sum Of CS% levied on the goods ilfttichmil ,Carlile; in pursuance of a sententb of- this Coon.— These sums were the-amount of the expanse incurred by the Officer in making the levy. , He also, ow% ed for a Writ of Ltvari facies vc nditipng evoires ;be made out Upon' 14,000 volumes., btlnk phi t ~t the defendant's goods and chattels, its4e4 he should rather have' said, in regard to theie volames, igni ponas, but his instructions would not warrant iIIIII. The CHIEF Jr saws hawing asked, whether he gave notice to the Crown ? and being answered in 'the cc gative, desired the •Learned Counsel to take_ a Itti:e to shew cause.—Application-granted. couwr OF EXCHEQUER, JUNE la. Mr. - George Edmonds, of biuningham, produced an affidavit, statin g that the deponent had applied for an Office-copy of the information; which Had been refused him on account of his- inability to pay • the customary fee, and that from this cause the Otlicer of the Court had refuted to record his plea of " Not Guilty." It was further stated, that he had no means of paying the fees, -or of retaining profes sional assistance. . _ Baron GaanalL—Doet yoar • affidavit state positively thzt you are unable to mislay- Coasted? Mr. Edmoods.—lt does fir laid. (Mr. R. read the part cf the affidavit in which this fat-was sworn to.) Baron Gaanass—But. the Court will require a much more erplicit affidavit befoie it can interfere. You must state it the usual terms,"sindiben you may be allowed to sue its fi a pesperia We can.do no Mare. Mr. Edmonds—My LOW, I have been informed that a torn exists •of reading the information to those wl:o canna ford paying for a. copy. It is, I believe, technically called rantiall Orr? Baron Gaosass—lt is first necessary that you, shoold pm ceed as the • Court has directed. Do not take up our time in,. necessarily. • Monday sennight, a press-man, in the employ of a respectable printbr in Edinburgh, was sentenced by the Sheriff to two months confinement, for stealing from his master's premises the sheets of two works in the.progress of printing, AN Err RAOXIMIART Clnctricetallor...—Yesterday morning,"surie men employed in Hyde Park, oppo. site St. Georgei Hospital, in digging , the ground, discovered a man's head, apparently recently buried. On a further search, some clothes, soaked in blood, were foundmear the spot, and severa) drops on the ground, but so - trace of the body. The head now her at S. George's Workhouse. BIRTR. On the leth instant, in GI - amnia4treac. Brossuick-arram Mrs. Richard Valpy, of a sen. • DIED. On Monday, the 11th instant, in Bedford-square, in the seth year of her ars, after a long and painful MISONS, which she en dured ivith singular patience and resignati*, Mrs. Huttitrarortik wife of Joseph Butterworth, Esq. M.P. She had no fear of death, but exemplified, in the pteepeet of dissolutienow the had done in her previous life, that calmness, peace, and btedfast assurance of Divine Mercy which support and adorn tlie tian character. On the 4th inst. Francis Drummond. Esq. of Soasoatistt. Captain in the late 98th Regiment of Foot, in the 72d year cf his age , .—representative of the oat:feat sod le family el the Druminonds, of liawthnendeaa, lierth rti t e d e t: b in. He its left three sons and three daughters to lament his loss: his elder: vin is new Lieutenatt-Colonel in the Third Foot Oussids• On Monday afteinoon, at his house, Hackney-reed, mead 216 Robert Ditehman, Eeq. after fourteen day* Illaeaa. _ MAILS THU DAY.-•-AAIII.IMPIII. Dublin I. 0 Waterford • 1 0 Guernsey AO Jamey trolLand -Flanders Jamaica Lisbon Frappe Hanaibrsh Gottenbeictik Malta • New- Y% 411111. o .1. o o O 0 o o O 0 . 0.. . . L: 0 1 . *.e - A . . 11.. HIGH-WATERat L 044 1 Dk mina • Alwyn*Am. ON Dal Dti Tibilibnittlik • ' SS minsselleigo 4 - Is 4,,thair 1* 'V DON : P It li<hed b - y • Tt. I nrie. Bat O • i 0 • •• S. - • • tt ft t;'.: ' _ e § 1. ..ci.. : c t ,, :.• r 14 1 0 , #11 i I . , 1 ) i ;; • , .) • *,; • 1 t ._ 0.... N ••••..•. of I One 43 81 L Artil tint are al Ilak These in St: St. L ` aeon Flaw sad) a thscli co..' C lh ford T.l *Ad lest mow is i Prizes a the Paw 11131 Prises f may A sad kis Who ha •.• 1 differeal to be It; ease, fa and will sets, at cancan' si Facer from Lo PLY3I &. And Pose lassvuis James I fed. 1,904 _ D:u River, Eraxrut Came tit Calcutta Lisbon. Gum I:idia. liAai a Mail f Cuxbave Haze from Jai islat4 w Lir New o Montgoi ter tu h, malted I ceived d Rebecca virAlia; RA Tie Cla Dir. Ku Nr. V.Tai Nr,Wal )Ir. Dai )l r. Wil Jr.N e ft The .1 !in t I 4 ~.. • • •• i• : . ',richt! -tarn I nance any Icet a 4 Board and AW [r. Jan Ir. V a l Ir. s al Ir. M e i Ir. S a d r „, am*3 1. 14 and suss e third Pune