Star. — London, England, 1812-02-26 00:00:00

41WENTi4Rr PROCEEDINGS. 'SE OF LORDS, FEBRUARY 25. Lordships, during the far greater part of this day's engaged in the further investigation of the claims Straiord, ins Committee of Privileges. Some respecting the admissib‘lity . of a certain part of the -1, on the motion of the Loan Cnancettor., was Marshy. The Committee then closed their pro :he House rrsumed. • - z tpon the table, the whole of which were nearly pd. -vere forwarded in their resper , bse stages. documents 'touching the etperatlODS and effect of Council, were, on the motion of the Larl of LAU - %Wed to be laid before the HO 4:r. base Papers were forthwith pr: tented at the Bar, u!), from the Privy Council 0111ce, and ordered • relative to certain renclirg Apprals were present by..lldr. I%l°N-rooms:a v, from the Cota:s of Chao :equer inlaid. - 4'ireltertrarof Co:unions Officers Bill was read a aird t:m.., reading of the Nottlr gham Frame Breezing Prc was postponed t•tl Thursday, in pursuance of the - troposod last night. (chins of some judicial busitle:s, their Lordship Lo-mu: i ow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. for the 2d reading of the Cambiidg► and B:lop rGli opposed the motior, on the ground that it itempted to prove tba... this Canal would be Gf any ..KETT defended the Ell in a speech of some contended, that the Canal would be of great ati:lty, + scarcely a farmer In the country who would not it, and-he therefore hovel the Ht..use would a!- a Committee. tER +% as averse to the measure, and thought there a for mien:lining the Bill. ND sPolte on the same side. - HARVEY supported the Bill;—and after a few another Honourable Meuilser, the }louse elivid:Al, +tbers were for the second reading 84—ik;aitist it 34 from the Lords announord their Lordchipt con lioube of Commons Officer. Bill, and eeveral iN gave notice, that on Thursday, the .sth March, for leave to bring in a Rill to amend the Act of I. commonly called the Marriage Act. He ob alterations which he inesnded to propose only re riages of orphan minors and illegitimate minors. PAIrISii aEGISTERS. ;E reminded the House of the steps he I the subject of Parish Registers in the he spoke at some length on the negii in which they were kept at present in n, stated several cases of great hardship drom, and in particular noticed the case iw of a sailor, who, in consequence of her produce her husband's register, lost all le to him when he died, from its being iis brother. The Right Honourable Geu• proceeded to state the plan be wished td concluded by moving For leave uo Al for the better regulating and pieserv and. other .(tegistert." •rtivits . r thought the object was a good fight to be supported, if it did not Make against the !gangs of individuali. The ire at present a mass of contusion, and be regulated. )I.K.STONE, upon the understanding was different from that of the last.par, )uld not oppose the bringing of it in. He the principal objections 'to the former be thought accounted for the opposition with s as to the evil intended to be :erne laved to him that under the law, even as . present, the Dishiips had the means of en regularity 14 their different dioceses. If the Dt suilicientr it would be better to give it vigour, than resort to any new crpet intent. the present Bill was intended as a source it being, as he understood, the intention rew Office with two Clei ks. iMITH r,:grettt d tile ill blcod that ap se fo-rr.e.r occasion. No pers. n, he tin vghr, .d any cctrwrsation with the Right hot'. Mr. Rose.), could suspect there was ai.y milking it a source of Resent.. opbated the idea th:.t tie Bill ii as .viicr Dissenters, and arced genet a.ly in lety of tie w words rem Mr. D. GIDDY and Mr. was, given. MR. WALSH. IKES rose, pursuant to notice, to move Papers relating to a Mtmber of that h tvere necessary for him to ground the Ach it was his intention to bring forward,. !omplaint which he meant to prefer. In tee, he would move for • the Record of the Couv.ction of Mr. Walsh, at for felony." then move— amble Addr.ss be presented to the Prince Regent, uoulti be graciously pleased to cause a copy of itich had been grimed to Mr. Wesh, together with 'grige's letter, to consequence ut which the pardon be laid before that House." • titc•uglit it became I.ita to say, that the ted*coidd not have been granted to Mr. as it nilgh: have been granted to any ,Anal. Whether Mr.. Walsh had been the the lowest poke in the State—whetter he Member of that House, or me of the itriduplc ont of doors, he could only have menifte4 from punishment by a free pardon.— raper he should call for was-- `ter train Mr. Walsh to his brother, dated Dec. Si' roductil at the Old Bailey ion'h s tint, in which . he 1 offence with which he bad been cbarged." I also wove— . Jeatlns, thy Solicitor for the trial, be required to iousa with the letter which he had just astntioned." ion to motions tor these Papers, &c. the ition which ho should ut prssent submit was— _. Ws6h, a Member of that House s being now at ordered to attend in his place on Thursday next, to an cornpl,n9r." ew wards from Mr. P. pRLNFELL, the the Right Hon. Gentleman were severally ied t and Mr. Walsh ordered to attend in Thursday nest, FRAUDS 04f BANKERS. UMMOND, after a few pbservatiors on pOw stands, with resfbct to Bankers, with the money of ()Airs, for spicial , ing set forth the inconvoniences at pre the occes4itT of inflicting severer pu- nishment in eases where such money was improperly - applied, moved for leave to bring in a Bill .4 for more effectually preventing the embezzlement of money, or other effects, left or deposited with Bankers, Mer chants, Attornies, Agents. Brokers, and others, for safe custody, or other special purposes." Mr. JOHN SMITH quite agreed with his Hon. Friend in thinking that greater severity was called for to punish that species of fraud against which the Bill proposed to be brought in was directed. In in numerable instinces the public were obliged to depo sit their money with bankers for safe custody to a I large amount. As the law at present stood, the sums s.:r deposited were unprotected, and he therefore thought great 'rime& might be hoped from ere MCA sine to be bro u -hr 4 forward by his Hon. Friend. I Mr. MORRIS thought there was a singularly dis t ,ettsOng anomaly in the law on this subject as it at pre stooi, The servant of the party entrusted with insoncy could be punished for a breach of trust, while the niaster escaped with impunity. He feared this ;anomaly would not altogether be removed by the Bill lo be brought in. He certainly did not mean to op pose the motion, but he thought many of the incon. venicaces at present• complained of might be traced to a want of caution in the parties depositing their money, and he would not give them a penal statute to guard that which with prudence they might guard themselves. They might be discreet in the choice of their bankers, watch over their conduct, and see that 'their securities were forthcoming, and that would be more likely to prevent the evil complained of, than the making of it a capital offence. He thought there might be less objection to making such an offence a mis•Jemeanour, than to m 'king it felony, The law proposed, might have the effect of the parties depo si:ing money more supine than they were at present, more negligent instead of more discreet. He had always an objection to making laws on part'cular cases. Toe CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, with respect to the Hon. Gentleman's last aigu ineut, there could be no diiliculty in considering whe ther the crime should be punished as a misdemeanor or by transportation. He did nut think the Act would have the effect of making individuals less discreet than they otherwise would be. If what had happened in the last year had not awakened those depositing money to look after their own concerns, he thought nothing would. The evil would be more repressed by the dread of punishment on the part of those to whom moray was entrusted, than it would be encou raged by the consequent negligence of those to whom it belonged. His Hon. Friend ought not to have been, charged with framing. an Act on a particular care. The 11111 proposed to be brought in was net fi.tilided on the conduct of Mr. Walsh, nor f.a any other recent case, but t n what had been com:ilained of tor years, and of which the enormity of the offence and the justice of severely puuishiryi it could not be denied. Mr. HORNER agreed'with the Right Honourable Gentleman, that the measure was not foutided on a particular case on the spur of the moment. It was a law to meet that which had long called lot a re medy,ifit was in the poWer of the Legislature to sup rly an eiEcient remedy. He doubted if the Bill pro posed to be brought is would supply such a remedy. In order.to meet the object of the Bill, its provisions were to extend to all sorts of property entrusted to all sorts of persons fur any..specific trust or purpose.— Now when it was 'considered what large-spate were so deposited in this country, it was important for the l-ouse to be aware of the effect that 'the Bill might have on the Courts of Equity; If, in this re spect, the Bill were not properly guarded, more in jury would be done by iti e ffe ct ou Courts of Equity, than it could do good in any other respect, Mr..A. BARING thought scme measure of the nature of that proposed, was necessary ; but a differ ence ought to be made between what was given as a commercial trust, and what was placed in a Banker's hands as a deposit, for safe custody ; between the case of him who let the property entrusted to him go %%lib his own, in a commercial midertaking, and he who violated a particular trust, as had been done in the case of Mr. Walsh., Mr. "MANNING spoke in favour of the Bill, which, ;ie contended, was more intended to secure the mcney deposited • for safe custody, than to operate in any other rise. The qutstion m as then put, and leaie given to bring in the 13,11.—Mr. DRUMMOND immediately brought i t in. It was read s a first time r ordeicd to be printed, and to be read a second time on Tuesday next. DIIOI7 S OF ADAIIKALTY. Mr. BROUGHAM, in pursuance cf a previous notice, rose to move for a Committee to inquire into the Disbursements frcm the Droits of Admiralty.— He cbserved, that when he formerly sutmitted a si milar proposal to the House, it was resisted en vari ous grounds, but principally it was urged that he had cot chosen a convenient time for the adoption of his Resolution, pending a certain contract which Avab said to have been entered into with the Crown, at the commencement of the present reign, for the esta blishMent of.the Civil List. Such an objection could not pow be urged, and from the general :emit of the debate, the country had certainly every reason to hope that an inquiry of a most in.poi tent nature should now be commenced, preparatory 'to a new and general settlement of the Civil List Revenue. He did not helicve that on the previous debate one Honourable Gentleman had dented the right of the House to examine into the application, as well as into the amount of this fund, and the Chancellor el the Exchtqukr bad told the House, that 1114 conscious of the due employment of these monies, and that not the slightest abuse of them could, by the most strict investigation, be discovered, he should, at the proper time, have courted the most minute inquiry upon the I subject. As that proper time was now arrived, in order to give the Right Hon. Gentleman an oppor. tunity of acting up to his professions, that he might chew the burdened nation that they were not the mere hollow pretences of temporary expediency, he (Mr. Brougham) now submitted the subject again to the decision of the House. In the outset he might re mark, that it was not reqnisite tliat lie should - make out even a jtrima facie case of abuse, because the Droits of Admiralty was a long disposable fund, over which it was the duty of Parliament to watch, and could not be compared to a grant for a particular service, to which it was known it could only he ap. pli e d. After the inspection of the volumes of docu ments which had been laid upon the table, netic of them tending to hive any substantial intimation, would be obvious to all that them watt :it ren?le ground had for a more critical examination, suppossng even that he could not show any circumstances of a suspicious character regarding them. Such was, however, by no means the fact, and the different items of which the account; were composed might be di vided into four general heads. The first related to sumsl . paid to captors and - claimants, on account of prizes, I although it was not it:disputably established that they were sl paid. The second class, not so large in its amount, was composed of sums paid apparently for the same purpose, but which there is every reason to be : here have not actually been sn paid, under the same head as the preceding. The third dtvisinn included a still smaller amount, and consisted of sums paid; ef the ground of which payments no account is given. I The fourth head, iecond in point of amount, embre. ced monies issued for various services, which it was not pretended had the most remote connection with I the origin of the fund. He would now consider the I various classes in sucassion, and supply frsm the pa pers presented one er two instances upon each of them. IWith regard to the first, he WAS by no means dispo , seti to deny that large amounts may have been justly ! paid to persons concerned in prizes, which ultimately I had been ascertained to have been ills rally made ; even to non•commissioned captors they might t ave been prudently given, but he maintained, th it in this distribution no preference should be shewn, and where favour was apparent, no specification of tie various items WAS supplied, to prove dealt was pre. per or necessary. In the Account laid before tl.e House in 1810, under the head of Special Payments, would be seen the en srmous sum of 8'269,789, pa'd to John Alcock, to be by him divided amoog the merchants of Spain, whose property had been seques trated in 1796 and 1;97. The amount of £34,921 was likewise inses ted as having been disbursed to va rious Commanders, on account of ships carried into Cape Nichol,' Mole, and illegally condemned.. Into the particulars of these two large items, surely some inquiry ought to be made, and it was a mere moc kery to acknowledge the right of the 11311'C for that purpose, and to refuse the belect Committee, the no mination of which he now proposed. It might be stated, that the accounts had been audited at the Treasury, but would the House delegate its right of investigation to any but its own Members, for that purpose by itself appointed, unless indeed, as in many other cases, particularly in that of the American clai mants, Boards were established, whose particular function it was to make the requisite investigation. He did not blame any individual Administration, because, since the time of Mr. Pitt, these abuses-had been continued under every Government. Other ar ticles might ha pointed out, such as the vote of £BB,OOO to Lord Keith, against whom an action having been brought for the detention of an Ameri— can vessel, atid heavy damages rteovered, his Lord ship was indemnified out of die Dr; its of Admiralty. This surely was very - doubtful policy, and our ene mies would not fail to impute such payments to one of two causes, for both of which there could be no ground that redress could be obtained at our Courts of Justice, or that our cruizt!rs were lawless in their' seizures. On a former occasion a Right Honoura ble Friend of his (Mr. Arbuthnot), in all the eager ness of conscious innocence, lad come down to the House, and explained to a shilling the item standing against his name. Nearly all the individuals whose' names were inserted in these documents, no doubt felt equally anxious to clear their characters from im putation, and not being able to do it in the House, they claimed a full and fair scrutiny in a Committee. Rear- Admiral Lewis had been paid a large sum for detaining a neutral vessel, and would not America, and justly too, without explanation, ask what security, if she continued a peace with us, she had that her neutral shipping should not he seized, if our officers were ap parently rewarded for their capture ? The Honou rable Gentleman here entered into a detail of the case of the Daphne privateer, owned by a Mr. Jacobs, which had captured the Circe in 1800. The prize was condemned, and £15,000 paid to the Captain and Mariners, and £lO,OOO detained for other pur. poses. Information, however, was subsequently con veyed, that the privateer had sailed without having • must:red her due complement of men. A Monition was issued in consequence, the money already paid was recalled, and the £lO,OOO in the hands of a third person, arrested ; and further, the owner was compelled to pay, in addition, 41700 for costs.— In this case, however, no remuneration had been paid to hint out of the Drcits of Admiralty, however de serving he might be; altheeigh in tf.e case of Sir Home Popham, similar in every respect but the names, that Officer had received e 21,000. It might be right for the House to be informed on what sort of authority it was that the money paid on account of the capture by the Daphne had been recalled, and Mr. Jacobs and his family reduced to beggary. It was not at the suggestion of a common informer, or of a qui lam attorney, but On evidence procured by a Reverend Clergyman, who had been in confinement for debt, and reduced to the condition of poverty of the Primitive Christians. He did.net mean to cast ally general reflection on the numerous respectable members of the Church of England ; but certain it was that this man formed no addition to their respec. 1 tability, for, after othet trades had failed, he turned I a broker in evidence, and procured two men, one of I whom had been convicted of perjury, and the other flogged at the cart's tail, to swear as much as was ' necessary to support his charge. For this signal see- I vice, the Worthy and Rev. Gentleman had received I from Government no less than £5077, and the first I of his witnesses 187, as a " gratuity for evidenie given." Under the second branch of his subject, he should mention with regret the grant of £9S to Sir Wm. Scott, " for services in deciding upon cases re; ; lative to American captures." He was firmly con vinced that the wealth of the Indies could not induce that Learned Judge to condemn a single cock-boat' contrary to justice ; but the words in which the item was stated were .peculiarly disgusting, and implied I what there was not the sli g ht est reason to believe.— I In the United States, however, they would not meet with so just an interpretation, where the natives were already strongly prejudiced against what they term ed the unwarrantable and flagrant injustice of the British Court of Admiralty. Other articles, however, thrust themselves forward, that could not be so . saris factotily explained. On the '2oth September, a grant of £2250 had been made to Sir Gen. Young, of one-third of the Dutch ship Frederick taken at the Cape. The :ram or 42 - 92 had likewise he n .. 4 to the Ear: of Duamore, o n an account nearly slim, ` tar ; and on the 17th Aug ust , Ad miral li - a epp , rt . caved part of the proceeds of Spa .ash 'mo s ..„„ !gored at M tridque. To the fi rs. o the w ; ta li particular attortion was due, becalm at the tim e a le ire at th? Cape was made, Sir George Yount so s ing ill Parliament as Member for Huntiidor filled a lucrative and honourable post, and up m i d lag i n a subs-Trent election, was sappointede amer at the Cape of Gold Hope —so that the most vivid imagination might be defied to state an ailap ime reason for this grant. The Earl of Ihrazoore meld ha%c a! hale to do with the capture f or which ben remunerated—and inderd the FenersA compi ertz re many pftbe items was so suspicious, as *r nps,' to demand farther i.orestigation as to their rod ( h . .i r t f .ry ratter. After a vend odic/ .ohservatioes, the li ck and Learned Gentleman coecludtd with mos* I ~ the appointme&t of a Select Committee, i n D i nqi , e into the appropriation of the k unds o f the ojo, 0 : A dmirAlty. 'she CH ANcr.r.r.oß of .the EXCHEQUER was of opit ion, toat the House aw , .ukl, bot kvi , itself call d upoa to part ht. Conimetee, upo u 1 the grounds statcd Ly the Hcatuurable a:it, Lea ma i I Ce..tlemart. l'he rapers to be Lid httoretk ik e me . mitr. , ..e w0u!..1 ne;escarily ir.volve s ich an iadet c 4, dct•iil of particulars, that folios rather th an 1. 1 .031 would bc t i be accumulated. nvides. the tint!, wat, that with all the laboured citations aad summ er& i i the Honourable Gentleman, he hid after all nude ott: no case in general support of his owl wo w .. What had been the allegatton of the Learned G un k . Oman ? Nothing more than this—that the fum e i i queftron bad been appropriates to the different pa. sons, and for the several purposes itAte a m the pi. pets. This the Learned and Hamuuralile Ga l lo n* admitted; but then he happeced not to limo ap a , abet grounds these payments bed bten sa now t _ and thoefore be thougnt inquiry neceisary. s em i of the items, several of the tivordings of this:: Iltlit the Learned Gentleman could not comprehend...kr the best of all possible reasons, as the Lam e d G m . tleman himself had frankly acknowledged, b ei . me he was utterly ignorant of the particular meritsof al respective cases. Now, though it might be a soy reason why the Honourable Geutlernan :bo l o be solicitous for information he (Mr. Perceval)c,ao not think that it was, therefore, suffiCient caustic troubling the House with the preseot mo.ion. If the Learned Gentlenian was so ignorant upon the moo of those cases, did be require of de HAsi to cache ignorance of their merits'as a p.csurnition of Oak 0 n merits; for reaHy there had been iu the whok coed of the elaborate speech of the Learned Gentleman, as other general ground to be inferred as that bra which the Learned Gentleman rested his applie t t a for inquiry. Had be ventured to state that thee had been in any of these instances an abuse in the mode of appropriating these Droits ? In what one iustaace had they heed Misapplied ? When, ppon the face ri the papers of the accounts themselves,' did date. pear sufficient evidence to induce the House to be. here that there had been a misapplication of u ase funds ? Oh, but says the Honourable And Learned geritleman, there may have been abuse, though 1 am as yet ignorant of it-:-there tray be asuse,thosit it don't appear upea ihe (ice of the accnuus them. ' selves, and therefore let us inquire. If this ates to be laid down as a sufficient ground for a grave ParliaMentary inquiry, he knew not how there meld be a limit or rule established. (Hear. hear.) Tbe Le. 'hours of PirliaMent would be endless, and as futile as they were endless, if they were always to applies Conimittees of Inquiry Upon such a ground as the. Under the head of " Special Payments," there sr peered an item of £269,789, paid to Mr. Jrha Al. cock, to be distributed by him amongst those we chants concerned in the trade with Spun, whose ece and property had been salty Ited :--- -- of the war with Spain.- 'l' seemed here again to have Ithe fact of a provision in the such merchants, which could 4 i rigid into effect. They lost th, ciu...nce of the capture of Ow led to a Spanish war, and themselves called upon to indanno Another item was that of it 544941 illegal condemnations at Cape what had been the circumstance illegal condemnations had been —there was a Court sitting the C. mmanders who had question 'Nought them into t to have all the authority and 1 Court ; and in that Court the, I From these decisions there were I Courts here. [Here Mr. Drool dissent to this statement.] Hr he admitted, inaccurate in star appeals to the Prize Court. no appeal,,for this Court at Cai ved to have been no Prize Court 1 its decisions were al, erigiut ' !..in the first instance, and by a , I Court of Admiralty here, and I :the condemnations were set ' ceedings against the captors. the I.e irned and Hon. Gent. ' of £SB,OOO to Lord t(eith, who . damages for the illegal detention vessel, He (Mr. Perctval) the Learned and Hon: Gentleman s. in the profession, but he remembered i i was considered to .be one of strum that had at that time of the Admiralty Court; by the customs of the West . 1 ,ion cf prizes Made in dotEction shared by the Commander. D•Tpltne, a privateer fitted out Hotiourable*Gentlemen hid gomi ment hahot remunerated. him a. l Home Popham. Thil was rather to corhe Trom the Honourable having strenuously censured ort Popham ; and after liavii!g stated tlldt'of. Mr. Jacobs were euentiaily 'turned hound upon the House, ant to do again what he so condemned , dune at all. As to t he c l er kym a n, him, but it he was the Means tion of this privateer haoin4 been : 4 ♦.. '4l . 1 1 1 , 1 y • ! 1 . i I 1 1 1 C z T • II N t I ; j 111111 PitALLI HOUS Their Lordship sittings, Were eng, to, the Barony of E debate &TON real evidence, which, adjourned till Mt shadings, and the Tbe Bills upon vate Or local, wet A variety, of do the Orders in 'Co *SID Aix, mast • A part of them by Mr. Littim.i RI to lie on the- table Some rapers n 'rd at the Bar by, eery and Exchetp - - iffselfeturemf and passed. The strand re vention Bill was . .artangetoent prof After dispatchi adjourned ull to- .• On a mction fi Stortford Canal I Sir J. Sl:Bit!C bad not been atts public iit:l.ty. - Colonel DUCI length. Ile cent that there was ac • be benefited by ii llOw it to go to a Mr. CALVE} was no reason foi .• Mr. BRAND Admiral HAI words from allot ..when the nambe -.—Majority 50. A Message fr eurrence in the private Bills. Mr. WILSON be would move f the mil Geo. 11. solved, that the fated to the mart Mr. ROSE had taken on last Session ; *gent manner i most par ishn, arising therets of Ow witiow inability to pr that was due claimed by hi tleman then p adopted. and bring in a Bii ing rarisb an Mr. BATf one, and oug too volently ltegistt.rs wer required rri be Lord FOl that the Bill said ha shouli -then- stated Bill, which hi it had met wi died, it appe; it stood at pr forcing regtiL law was not s addit onal vii He feared the of revenue, ii to appoint a r Mr. W. Sl l l reared on the who had had Gentleman (1 intention of atrongly rep: tended to lay the propriety ' After a fey Rosa, Mr. RANI Um certain 1 1 House, whit! case on, whic •and that con the first place ". A copy of tl the Old Bailey, I He would " That an but ptayirg that he the Pardon Whicl *copy of the Jur was grained, to Here he th pardon. Frank Walth. but a Other individn highest*: the had been b meanest iocliv been esceviptes The ne tt Pap' " The Letter 1811, and produ confessed the an He should " That Ms. is intend the House • Is addition only propositii to the - l9use • " hat Mr. N% lege, lw ordered ewer to the said c After a lei Motions a the i.ut and carrie place on DRUb he 14w, ai it Etc. entrusted ..urpokats, havi tut tekt, and arstr.ited in cot.srgeense a he Learned CA-adman i been totallj ignorant cif 4 he peace 0 Arnica% fot t ld not at terward, lat ea. a their property in Loam Spanisti friga:es, %bell 0 d G'cvcrameat did fed A dermay these tembian. .1 £54,941 1 on accoot 4 a !ape Rocha* Moles bet I tances tinder which tbest e eeu bad t Simply thew 11 at Cape Nichol' Msill a made the eaptvet is r this Court, ammo/ it t d jurisdiction of 4 NI fl :hey were coridenniedee A vere appeals to the him 6 roughans intimated iig k He (Mr. Percevsl) Mu is ;acing that thcre had WA 1 There had been, in 64 Cape Nichol* M ta ol r ej: t :ourt at all, and b st null, legally Val* t direct application todit 1 td nut to the Prise Cori as:de with costs of pm a s. Another *lionise it i ridernart was to do WM i who had incurred bats s tention of an Amcor 4 I did not know ilialig . 1 deman was at that WI nembered that this Ca 1 1 the nicest and most& * le occupied the atter* and certain it was, 1 110 est India autism* a Pr: fiction of munggliag "I a As to the ease of de int . by'a Mr. Jacobs, is • complained that GPI* A um as they had dime 0 ti rather a curionsaisitki , Ie Gentleman, of i r the liant to Sit iltS It stet" that his, cam b i ntiailr the same, led. Is se, and clainied_ e l 'tuned in them fok man, lid kncw . • p s et' leading to 110. 0 been illega!ly 11M . . !I