Star. — London, England, 1820-10-24 00:00:00

• 4. \ N .., .... . • . - ' was seat mt i 1 tam. OoTerlillte pentad lOW of lead Brown. Rimeonew.Nothrekt e hic h had faun Soft ids other Waco to depart fro the question litainetter:utc,llifitich lie would repeat (raid"' Manila) *Si ask whether your Lordships are sittine as a Court of Jigs tta'r When it suited the purpose of the Ceased for the, Bel, when they wanted to exclude an evidence which was material for her Majesty's vindication, by tying him (Mr. B.) down; by binding him round with nine-fold technicalities— /whoa they wished to prevent him from brealtingthrough that maze or cOnspirary and perjury in which they lad endea vaured to entangle his Illustrious client—then the word Court of Justice was constantly sounded in their aim. But now abandoning everything like form and regularity of proceed: ling. flying the face of every principle that guides the Courti \ below. their Lordships were applied to, not as a Court of Justice, but as a House of Legislature, to grant, but of their great indulgence, a !avow which it could never have entered into the Imagination of any man to apply for to any 'ether tribunal. a I ask" said the Learned Gentleman, " if in any Court since justice was administered in this land, dace anything like fairness was dealt oat between , parties by 'what are called forms, those handmaids of justice, if ever a pro position so monstrous as that now offered to your Lordship, was attempted to be made ?" And what was the delay asked for? That the character, forsooth, of Colonel Brown might be dicated--of Colonel Brown who was no party here, who was not now en his trial, wh atever he might afterwards be.— Because things had transpired in the course of these proomdines 'wind her Majesty, which involve d the character of Brows in jeopardy, the Queen was to be fo r g otten—no, not forgotten bet trampled upon. Let Colonel Brows defend his conduct afterwards as he may, but let not the case of her Majesty, who was here the only party, be delayed on his account. The Counsel for the Bill bad said, that the charges against the Milan Commission had come upon them unexpectedly. The statement was not true. In the opening of her Majesty's de fence, he (Mt. Brougham) had affirmed, in terms which could leave no reasonable meat in doubt, that the conduct of the authors of the Bill, of the planners of the Queen's destruction by the Milan Cominiasion, would be inquired into in the course of the evidence adduced in support of that defence.The Counsel for the Bill knew that it would, and they had prepared against it. The moment that the awns of Bonfiglio Pomarti had escaped his (Ile Brougham's) lips, out sprung from the owhich they had so amply filled witledocuments for th pros e cution, a brief, prepared long before-hand, containing a statement of all that Pomarti might be expected to prove with respect to the Milan Commission, and from that brief he had been cross eaimilned with the greatest possible particulmety by the Learned Attorney-GeneraL After this, it was something like audacity, be would not say in his Unmet Friends, but in their employers, to say that they had net bad die notice of the charge that was to be broeght against the Members of the Milan Conuttitsion, for their practioesin getting up this prosecution. The next thing be supposed which they should hear on the part of-Col. Brown was, that be bad not had a list of witnesses, nor any specification of the charges against him. (A laugh). " We, My Lords," said Mr. Ramensmit ' " complain of such things, we have felt the w ant of them ail through the course of this proceeding; but never did we foresee or apprehend the possibility of such an ap plication as this. Will your Lordships, for the sake of Co. lone! Brown, however favourite an agent he may be of timi Milan Commission, again stop short in this extraordinary proceeding? Will you suspend my Illustrious Client camel more in that state of horrible anxiety in which she has bee* 'kept by you and by her persecutors? Will you continue' het in that state of torture, by making such a plunge as yen are now invited to make, out of all regularity of procedure, into iontething as dark, as lawless,, and as unknown td Courts of Law, as anything which the human imagination can conceive ? I ask if your Lordships will inflict such a cruelty on my Illus trious and suffering Client—a cruelty so needless. so gratuitous, so shamelese—an injustice so beyond all example?" Mr. Damns followed on the same side. The reason for the application for delay was, that Colonel Brown was not in Eng land, but in Milan. Bet why was• he not here? He knew that be must explain his conduct, that he must defend his practices. Why then was he not here at the time when be was sure the in. diary into these practices and that conduct w o u l d be ent e r e d into? The Learned Counsel said, that no sooner had a word escaped ippon the defence which related to the conduct of the Commis stau, than a crowd of panegyrics poured in upon every perion concerned is that Commission from those who sat as Judges, and the Qesecn's Advocates were itopped in the very threshold of their case by ealogiums, some of which were applied to par titular persons, and others drawn up as blanks, to be applied to any others, whose reputation might appear'vestionable--(t teaa,h).—lt was false to aay, that those who were emploied upon ilia Commission slid not expect to be called as witnesses. ,Every rasa of th.: evidence gave the lie to that assertion—for every page Dare an allusion, teat was not to be mistaken, fo the Coming of CaL Drown and Vilniacarti. How eould it be asserted that suchaa espectadoa was not entertained ? He did not'novr condenutroL - Brown, and he trusted that the delay required, which, in a *case concerning so delicate a thing as female reputation, the Penn coula cot with any reiard to their own character grant, would sot b: yielded. Why was the delay asked? Was the Bill a pivorce Bill? At first it was stated to have that charactei, and Etacked and defended as such, but soon afterwards the Divorce ellase was removed, and then the Bill became one of Degra datior. ar.d pethronement. Was this proceeding analogous to any thiag that had hitherto taken place in the history of Bills of raps and Pecaltieß In any event, the whole question as it stood in the 3ra=ble &tumid be proved, and what had been proved? The question rather was what had not been proved? It was cleuif this indulgence was granted to one party, it must be also to the other. 'lle advantage must, as far as the House could make h, be no ciprocal, and the consequence would be, as all knew who oh oervesi the occurrences of the world, that years would be ma etipird in the investigation. Her Majesty would have to send to Milan to procure additional evidence to rebut that which Col. Brown and his associates would no doubt endeavour to rates, and this process would become too unwieldy for the mind of man. Her Majesty hid to contend with difficulties of no ordi nary stamp. It was amongst her labours to cou n teract the evi deuce of witnessla whose names she had not been apprised of, sad ' who accused her of crimes, said to be committed at places, and at does, respecting which she had been refused all intelligences` Was it not cruel to accumulate upon hei other difficulties, and to attempt to mar her cause by this delay? In every part of the evidence the conduct of the Milan Commission was alluded Ow in en uucquivocal a manner as to destroy all doubt as to the no ceseity of having upon the spot those who were liable to the imps tatiens. Why were not those witnesses produced before, and why was the Queen to be shut out from justice because it bad been thought eat -dicta to allow the Commission to red at ease until her case was closed ? Were they or were they not in a Court of EnglithJestice ? He called upon their Lordships to hook at the modes isiewhieh this whole business had been conducted, and to sty whether her Majesty bad not been taken by surprise? The Learned Counsel concluded, by deprecating the whole system upon which the proeccotiou had been conducted, and declaring that it had been demonstrated by evidence and could be de monstrated by argument, that the Queen had been foully and falsely accused, and she was now entitled to an acquittal The Anostite-Gauxaat addressed their Lordships with great •rr .I `-e warmth. It was, be believed, the tweeds& time be was told '. by her Majesty's Counsel, that the bad met with no indulgence from the House. The a lge t i v l as, and the House Anew it, that she had met with mere indulgence than bad ever been granted to any other individual whatever. She had asked for time, and it was granted without hesitation. She bad had the advantage of hearing all the evidence against her, and of producing persons with the view of refitting that evidence. Be was surprised that Mr. Brougham and Mr. Denman should now. after -having so repeatedly accused the Milan Commission, declare that they had made no accusation.— ▪ Learned Gentlemen had tailed in proving the conspiracy, and then they set up , another sort of conspiracy which existed nowhere except in their learned breasts, a conspiracy, to bribe p e rsons who had not been examined. Would their Lordships al 13w a new eam to be opened without giving an opportunity of an swering/ The Learned Counsel defended himself from the many Seporsions cast upon him in the course of the Investigation, and ailed upon their Lordships to give hen the opportunity to rebut the calumny that isc was playing upon their Lordships. His . object was nuthiurbut substantial justice. The LORD CHANCELLOR said it appeared to the to • be the duty of the Attotney-General, considering all the cir atuoutances of this most important ome, to make tbh applique". The application had been made for two reascof; one tar the sake of the character of Colonel Brown, and the other with the lodic effect of his midenesupos this cam. He coosideree Lordships were bound to sailed apes all thi edition destillaitell unit Pinang Or its ths'yeks. • •--- • -••• . • ••• - • - •• - • • • 4, ' 7 77 7 19 '/ . 7,7% ,- r` 7 • • • .71" 7 46a. Ile dreattviiir *NAL . ge - 01*. _oketheehi . a 1. *4 thrafeles eikOisuetei, k *saki be 41ongeteat WNW eagle and benad allOr "Itail li P " Il liti .l. ! the "el" II 1 welt at is with these wide Barons. 4 :^ . In -coosequeace *I& &kith* Esperimmesd b 7., "n r en" :4 eV air. argeseed at tie da il . ba &odd oar pat eft WM& is bk Sit s slept kikVotbaw Tlto the Quitmes Counset„ 'they yesterday, St *heady so: spades as width Asir wield 'bon to dock* tired, dosed the CM of her MITBSTT).--eibt fliii was wbstbor tbe applicatko ao row" now or after the was fOllO —who could have imagined the fact ?.. Attorney-General bad tationised - Ids other witnesses? If the . &l e y were seemed et th i s mg dee At i onna e men i by a segues% on the part of the Counsel for the Pro lwftid h ave on o pp o rtunity d pubis mob ooldes?e• ' a nd am seat*" to be allowed same delay in the proceedings add to the delay of *de to enable them, forsooth, to bring Colonel Booing to - - Adjostlx 4 at TonistY - avo Inolltd Put Th 000• the Bar I! l'hii 'extraordinary demana called forth a. ' answer from Mr. Bitouttosst, who sa- [vdr Them who are tequaintedwith the preens of printing, sat these ally, can form-any Mu of the hurry we must have , been in, since the Trial of the Rya= commenced, to .talk ,e to publish, within two boars of the Tieing of the Court, every day, the whole of the proceedings, in a Th,ird Edition. To suck we need offer no apology for slight mistakes. They will only be surprised that they should have been so few ; for, set to go farther back, such an attempt, only thirty years ago, would have been reckoned about as practicable as to carry Bt. Paul's to Reamlnater. We remind our Readers of these diSculdes, that they may count the trouble less of correcting an error of some consequence is our Third Edition yes terday. By an inadvertency in putting the types together, 24 lines of Mr. Dentures concluding address were put into the Arroaxer-Genmes.'s,*thus .r-abeg both quite inco herent. The 7th line of the matter put into the address of the ATTORNIT-GIOISSAI, beginning with the words " Divorce Bill," to 3oth inclusive, ending with the words 1 4 she bad"— belong to Mr. Denstates address, and should have come in between the 24th and 25th line. Both speeches are given correctly in our columns this day.) most powerful _—... oar. tisfactorily demonstrated from several circumstances, end among others, from the iiilestrOns putts ?OSSA RV, that the Counsel for the ',relocation knew the conduct of Colonel Thump would boa questioned, in wrecks' time to have had him sow here if they had choion,, and justly observed, that it was the QUEEN of ENG LAND, and not (ulonel BaowN, who was ROW on trial. Because his innocence had not been proved, was the QUEEN to be forgotten? The LORD CHANCELLOR asked a delay to this morning to go over the -evi dence, in order to give his opinion whether, under all the circumstances, thii applicatida of the Arroz-. 'NEY-ristiERAL should be granted. What that answer will be may easily be anticipated ; for a Lawyer of such a sound understanding and such long standing as his Lordship, will soon make up his mind to the impos sibility of allowing such an absurdity to be palmed upon the Houseo—An hour or two hence will, how ever, remove all uncertainty on this point. NINETEENTH DAY OF THE DEFENCE. HOUSE OF LORDS. This day, the Lose Cuarestr.os took his seat on thelffeel sack o few minutes before ten o'clock. Prayers were dies reed, and the Lilt called over, is the usual manner. • Earl GREY then rose.-s-0 My Lords, as I ttust we may now entertain some hope of approaching the end of these proceed ings, in which we have been so long and so painfully occupied, I wish to call the attention of your Lordships to one drawn stance, which I conceive to be essential for your consideration, before you give your anal decision in this most important cause. in Phillips' Law of Evidence it is laid flown. that if the testi mony on any trial differs from that at which the indictment has bees founded, the Judge and the Jury have a right to call foe the original depositions, to enable them to decide how far they correspond. It is the right of the accused to dented this in ordinary cases. my Lords, it appears to ow =wean* im portant that we should consider the nature of the evidence given at the bar—evidence which strongly proves that the testi mony does net correspond with that before given by the same witnesses. This being the case, my lArds, k becomes necessary that we should be put in possession of the testimony given by the witnesot on oath, as laid before the Secret Committee. I am aware that the examination of these witnesses has not been lee the depositions given before Magistrates; but though extre trtima kre, they have been en oath, and have been fore the Secret Committee, and on them was founded the basis of this Mirky. Conwhing, as I do, that it is essen tial we should be pot in possession of these deposition; before we are called as to tied* on this momentous proceeding. I elhall, at Altus period, move that they be laid before your Lordships." The LORD CHANCELLOR.- t' My Lords, a question /laving arisen het night, in 'outcome* of the apillicatioo of the Goose* for the Bill to stay these proceedings Until Wesel Brews *braid he called to your Bar, I have read through the whole minutes, so far as relates in any deiree to the question. king the Attorney-General of ail blame in making the as well as the Counsel for,the Queen in resisting it. I awe declare it my individual opiniots, founded on an examina dos, of the evidence, and of what justice renders necessary, that, in my _opielon, jiteice lees no retake He roe Lori stips_ ANN isles these proasidows--fertes Hear, /goo,— With regard to the evidence r it to Colonel Brown not withstanding all that has hem stated at your ' Lordsidik bar, Altus* of which it is deobtful whether it can he received at not. I and but two persons whose • testimony relate* to Colonel Brown at all; and I do not, in that view of the case, think k would be just, in respect to her messy, to the Proceed in--(Titter, hear.) 1 thogofor• move, 4 That Counsel be two ta il e d i n , and, wormed. that it is the wish of your Lordship s that they should now proceed.'" The Earl of DARNLEY rose amidst much coughing, which continued during the whole of his speech. Ile said, if thew pro ceedings were top on at all, it was palmist) , right that they should go on now; bat fie cooddsred it hit imperious dirty so declare his humble but Arm opinion, that they ought to be tern& nakal st saw ; and be Wondered that no WOO4Olll OM his side of the *We, nor on the other, had not *draw one moved, that the proceediop should terminate at Once. He would, j rnivige enter his Miehin protest against proseedlng any AMU, is ihit disgraceful enquiry ; and them were three distinct roved@ ern which their LWsklp; ought to plat an end to it. Fly*, the difficulty of 'pureeing the clue of the ettospiracy, and proving Whether false witnesses sand inherited testimony bag net been produced at their Lordships' Bar. Secondly, the aberration of Easton. Thirdly, the failure in rondo/ Baron d'llatle as a witness for her Majesty. lie (Lord Docility) thought any 'one of these grouse snakiest to put an and to the pro ce edings; inn taken altogether they were irresistible. therefore, woeld enter his solemn protest against all further proceedings. The Marquis CAMDEN agreed Is the opinisa of the Lewd Chancellor, that the House should not adjourn. At the same time, be must state, that his acquaintance with Col. Brows had led him to read all the evidence with pardodar care ; and that he thought it hard upon him not to have an opportunity of ap pearing at once at their Lordships' bar, to rebut the charges against him ; but, as it had been intimated that at a future period the lUilau commission would undergo due investigation, be thought it advisable to postpone the consideration of that sues. deo at present, and to come to as early a decision as possible upon the case of her Majesty. The Noble Lord added, that be had always understood Colonel Brown to have acted in his military capacity in a very distinguished manner. That excellent Oilker had been a Subaltern fourteen years, and had, in the course of his various services, been several times wounded, Lord HO LL AN D said, that he meth approved of the opted= delivered by the Noble and Leaned Lord on the Woeisask ; but he begged leave totally to deem (roan the pfacdce which bed recently bekonse so common in that House, of panegyrising them whose conduct had bees censured. He should take camas lie course of the investigation, to detain from making any comm- as of etch a nature, and he trusted that the same conduct woad be purseed upon the part of other Noble Lords, whose kindness had in so many Instanoes exceeded their discretion. - The LORD CHANCELLOR, then put tii i asistion, that Counsel be called In, and inketned th at their s did not acquiesce In the proposition of a delay. It was nom Ong. having been called in, The LORD CHANCELLOR stated to them what be had in command from the House. The Anonerv.Osnio-u. then stated to their Lordships, that be wished to call Captain Briggs to the bar. THE EVENING STAR. LONDON. TUESDAt, OCTOBER 24, OM THE TIMM& irlos or s'rocza THIS 11AT AT ONE O'CLOCK Bank Stock 216 2154-3 per Cent. Reduced 464 S per Cent. Cans. 674 4.-114 per Cent. 754 4 per Cent. BSI 65--6 per Cent. Navy 1044 104 Long Annuities 174 7-16....ind1a Bonds 255. 265. pre lank. NW 4s. Ss. pre.—Otnnhun 24.--Genes for Acct. 674 4. Capons Balsas *OM in, moitesentissai kg Skarsoanar-Gsatawas. Yes stated that you commanded the Leviathan when her Royal Highness the Princess et Wales tem en board that ship ? have. Do you remember lieutenant annum on board that 'dap with her Royal Highness ?—I do. • believe you stated Olt Sagami. , was also en hand that ship ?—I did. Do yen recallert having had any eartereation with lieutenant "lowans Mt the subject of Bergami ? ' 1 Mr. Ramona* objected to this question, wpsa the ground that Lieutenant llownam had not spoken tit any eanewastian with Captain Edgy upon that subject. • • • [There was a murmur amongst their Lordship; open wMu Mr. 8201/C2AI4 waived the objection.] The witness answered—s' I do." • •• • : Was the conversation ahem Beltway belie admitted to Sea 111 her Royal Highness's table 1 0 1...1e . ape what .Ise mill to yqu on sitar oesodopi—,reaseffee 'l/11& Ilairoatn, la the move, r ae liz ed gand had waited be on board the- CM it was** he was amigos% leptleel, that it was so; atlistitted Us; that he! „>.. I . . haeol, aid wattage la his sift net to admit lahD se fiat ta w M ots purpose. ha ease able Ihis endsithsad ,W loommait Iftininipath tilt wipes@ in bit annrif, and oflds he was OW whether Lisitoledit Meesome :owed whim begpmed. The AmosnoraChlheist..-AND the hem of per resollecthin um whether he Mat is you the theie?-4 Anglin" he isid. Inetad.••••• Mr amaAr leteraptel the skews; told Mat to direct in his asset; and oohed NM *bat he meant by th e •Andy" Wltossio-TO she host et soy reeallectioo, be told me it was the day that ihiseeers altratien was dotard, the eery firshday aluitam dined ether Royal _table. Mr:Rootemoas, as Moo as the fl-band Writer had read the questim and answer, said, that the words / esdernood" bad besosimitted is one part, and " k Was hollowed" In another. It was suggested that the whites Amid withdraw ; but Mr. Brenham add, It was neeessery he should be present. The Loomed Coined then denied that it should be stated a 'the Sherohaod Wither% notes that the witness '• Uodastaod,' that " It was lodinated to yin," and at length, th a t se Mr. Howson told him." It was meet isaiortal that those paw_ Mars *mid be gaud. The Seassinoaddiessat. said, Am Mr. Ilamaux Lim ag phi the whams in Ms &sewer... th e words wlllek he had uttered, *told net hs eatated i as the etplanadon bad sot been allowed. The LORD CHANCELLOR sold, that what was went would be milemed Irma the full mower which the witness bad given. Lori LAVIDERDALE said a few wards to the same effect, It was at immth demendoed, that the words which the wh om had usolithould bet eortaide the Shest-hand Writer's notes. The Armanstr.Oessisam. said, be had so ether quesdocato ask. Cresateesised by Mr. Boomstaii. Whoa this cestrenaties happened .en board the Leviattan, where was the skirt -She was as her passage float Porto P.A. to Palenno,le the year tats, and the month of Novembc:. We wee* walking together en deck-we had occasionally waihad Medea so deck. Have you had am fiber cenvenatious wide Lieutenact Hewitson upon elee abject have. He came of me frc in Erandenhorgh Howe, and asked me the nature of the evidence I it to give in this case, and I declined answering. bit, Reocelase-Very proper. Above meat in the teasing he mese to me, and on tatting kese4me he said be would be obliged to me if I would tell him *blether me theratlies had bees Wade in the cabin of the he viethas, that he did not weaned say ; ease - which I expressed my surprise, and said that alteration a 4 boa made, and made peereace. Tee were Madded abut Care* redid' sod Bergand, when Captain Pechell had made Wile slim:den to sitting down at table with Bergami i-Yes • his theectleowas to..Bergami; he" had no objection to sitting stows with her Royal Highness at all. Oh. I dare say not-(4 losigh).-But I understand you to have said to Mr. Hownam, that Captain BeCh.ell bad positively refused to allow Brigand to sit down at table with 'WO-No ; what I said .was, that Captain Peebeli bad told me Raped wed to stand behind the chair of her Royal Highness, Were you not taking with hit. ihrwtam sheet the reason which int:toted Captath - Pechell to refuse to allow linvoi is sit at table with hint ?-No. But you were talkies about Peehell and Beegand?-..We were. And about the objection which operated with Captain Fe -1 chill against Berganars sitting at table ?-I cannot say that, foo is wet long after that Captain Pothell refused wait at table with ;it was ends* second mask°, wipe her 4011111441 h• less was on booed the Clorinde. Did you make any Dote of the corwasegle.Tin sr PM hot with Lieutenant Elownans?--Sone wimeaver t And Teo are now swearing to words which spoken hoe years ago?-1 kayo* perfect recollection octhe congeratioe. When did you first repeat it to eni one te-I believe I have mentioned it several times in Do you recollect mg one time when you retested 0 , 4 1 was brought tom recollectim by a letter, desiring to know whether *Lieutenant Ifovreaaa had ever bad such a conversation with ma ? When was that P-I suppose about seem ec eweelts age. Was it since this proceeding has been ringenk was otiose the Howe metier the first time. When did you Irst.mention this ma etravetestits after rhea. calving that letter ?!-I wrote ha mower thot it bad .happesed ; that it was true. ' And I understood you to my it was dips litter whisk larausitt the onwersacian as _your recollection tr l ii did set mem that the fast was never from my hood esum atlal. Not for eye 113041,11-.14 recollected the conveseation pepp feet. Ifiways.rosteinlared As I have already said, wises was w rhUM tit hut, whelp's' it bad occurred, I treinedhs styli "minted that it bad. Yon hare mid that the eenversadoo was always ia wale re. ealleodas. Can yen mine any peseta to Whom you mepdated It before yen wrpte - the to as that later meadows' it en several ecessioaa I miela perhaps isms mane perepos went present, reateMber of awe esaadoeleg it to Sir Quer Cockburn. • You ause t opp et' the Leeds of the Ashrtirsltyt-Teo. When Was dipt?....Eome time me, I dare my many minim age *Pr y e Vs! I iniOd 4ol 4 it - as** ittfew I was v) be mtned hre. Had Sir Deism atekbena beat caestiesitsi yes * the .ab ject?-.No. Did yens lamb die movereadso ahem k?-We ewe Wile; feria what hid to my mentioning it ; I only remien the fact reiM: • lira Wave the lomat of wig the Itisg have yid nut P-Tes, what waslmelY m ?Gent that'dnetyonsiere lea • thlis Heaset-•- , elyee I was last' minim& • B• 4 1 0110 . 84 4weanir-sips.. Wye yes the eselthmail of the pard.olip at Batellaadailsal Tee, if do Osseo thalami. s' • . , Weri. min the commiandwian the P- arthlMlßW•lawat • Booth?-.; 4 wit. Did yoga diiie wish the Kim eheift who had paid thole respects mat *ea• sy at P Tea along with all the' Navy at Portsmouth. 'ATM one et tli Carobs without eamollith.• . . telissiosed by leer Zeriskips. .. By Lewd 111011LEY..-In thi n "iogittl.- it which Yen 1 04 with Liestessant Hointain, did so , pass which madam; to take era yourself to farms i it that be said be had in , treated her Majesty, epos his knees,* with tears in his eyes, Sty and not that " I could have date se?".4tedevattied him to say, that hi had entreated her Royal 11 11:Xellees h ia knee l"' awl wi th tears la his eye*, set to ash* to sit at able; with ber. • ••• By Lad DARLINOTON.-Will ral bar the goodness to my Whether you *Mk you can recollect wbat pa l ed in pirate meareramita five years ago 7-Omerally I 1:1110019 'jilt I have . 11 Indict remembrance of that conversation. trion Itablnfirmr, liii. - Hownant's attendee to what Captain 14t e el bad to 4!° it illtrad. By Lord MORLEY.-In year waversatial With lin Hewing; did he ay whither ea the first. s ageadim that Bet ' pod set at the table of her Royal Bigamies, it arose fain dr; owastances width moored Welimully at the maw s Or is masteuenee arreagesnent wsderstoed mower to the I had pm to Mm, to refer to the day when the thane toolt 'bee in•Borpiars situation, from ser- . amt. to conspioden, • Captain ildas was new ordered to withdraw. The Asmourr-Ostranaa said, as the ease sow stood, he otoold net tremble t h e House with cattle( say more witnes se s' lb hoped the Muse would indulge Captain Briggs with Per' missies to realm to his eamiseed et PertnnesdL Mr. Bewealwasomay lards, we have not the slightest wish is inammode either Captain Dim or the service -(e lanai). The LOUD CHANCELLOR said, that Captain Daggs hod the Idick ft The LZ ha el li ' ll /lOME ET • DOW renewed the proposition I:wiith he bad made gmmrday,for recalling Lieutenant lleernam. . bad LIVREWL mid, that U thin Midas be opening wide field of in4islry„ iterotild be well V-the Noble Doke would smite the reasons ea which he pounded Ma proposidcm The Duke ofIIOMR&SET said. that the purpsm for wh ich he wished Mr. Howoani retard was, torelmothe him more pa y at WO* hkfiglat Of the toucan beard the pollees f I . He -AMON. Omage - sumo dim had petal for their sieild la the the 'tom to yels fa toar easteewr— , r owns* to ,r,..7: 1 ,1 -"i f . T ra T ai ii isaV411.411111; dot IWIMeII 77:rjri 1 6. i mi i&M".77 .1 * 4„ a f a a d oom in Aid htiheil ar ldi sl e e kelr lobes the Maul 4": " ,60 1 sed tidied Qs, boor • • lioroPoo 160 %ober yal 11111sheetel putt his oil eviiehee wool D; Olt 1111 wee wavy this the Pilmieetitot • * be m aje g liS Z seetet lop the deb °I . ba g a l lwag a 6.1111 / 1 1 . 111 0. 116 . eq 114 .. • - • THE QUEEN. The Quint's case was closed yesterday by her MAJESTY'S Counsel, in consequence of the impossibi lities they had experienced in their attempts to bring a German . Baron to the Bar of the House to give evidence for their IllustriOus Client. The circum stances connected with this will not escape the ani tnadversions of the British Nation. Baron d'Ettot, the person wanted, could not come over without the permission of his Master, the Guam DIMS of BADEN ; but, according to the correspondence, the GEAND DUKE was determined to shew the utmost K impartiality," and therefore could not lay his com mands on the Baron to make his appearance. Observe the falsehood of the statement respecting impartiality. The Minister BIRSTETT had, according to the evi dence of BARBARA Neasa, compelled her to come here to give evidence against the Quapi. (" He told me, I might as well come quietly, for, if not, I should be forced f'—Karns evidence.) Yet there was not even an expression of the will of authority that the Baron d'Eitoz should make his appearance for the Queen, though Mr. LAMS, in his application to the Court of Carlsruhe, bad stated, and justly, that the gaining permission to the Baron to appear, was " esseatitil to the character e the Aritis4 Govern- Tent,"--that his own character for impartiality, and that of the British Government for sincerity and " gootifaith, were equally at stake." Either, therefore, BARIARA KRESS has here perjuired her self, or M. DE BERITETT has told a falsehood.— Now, though we do nut think that BARBARA Klass would scruple to perjure herself where she had any motive for it, we cannot see what possible motive she could have for doing to on this occasion. We see, however, what motive M. Butererr had for tell ing a falsehood; and we have little doubt that he yielded to that motive. Those who know anything of the general character of the vile and corrupt crew who breathe the pestiferous air_ of the petty Courts of Oa many, will have little difficulty in believing that M. BERSTETT, for a small. matter, would go still greater lengths to oblige the }Ciao of Trlallovia. In point of conscience, M. BERSTZTT and BAIIIIARA Kacss are possibly pretty much on a par. - • But the conduct of the Baron himself deserves a little more notice. By the evidence of Mr. LEMAN, Mr. VIZARD'S Clerk, whom the Counsel. for the Bill did not even attempt to cross-examine, it vas proved that Baron d'Ewna would have appeared in favour of the QUEEN if he had dared. In the emphatic language of action the Baron placed the hand of the witness upon his heart, requesting him to feel, by what strong emotions he was agitated, in consequence of his not daring to appear for the QUEEN of ENGLAND. it is remarkable that this same Baron denies the acuteness of his feelings on the occasion alluded to, and even cloaks the denial by a second falsehood, pretending that he had no personal conference with Mr. LEKAN, but that be sent his refusal to appear in, England by a third person ; wherea s i t is unden i abl y' proved, by the evidence yesterday, that Mr. Lams . met the Baron on the road from Baden to Carlsruhe was taken by him into his carriage; that they both returned to Baden, in order that the Baron might refresh his memory by the perusal of his diary ;.:... such was then his zeal in favour of the QUEEN !--In point of fact, the Baron does not, and dares not come to England. What, then, according to Mr. LAMS'S own dilemma, becomes of " the character of the British Government, for sincerity and good faith r, Well might Mr. BROUGHAM talk of the Ministers. the RIDINGS, the Gnaws and all th at crew. Bet these are men of adle hirlt the'pieking of locks, the suborning pf witnesses ► and the telling of false. hoods do not, we suppose, degrade them. Captain banal auld net consent to xit at table with a!ban who had once waited ca Zej-rbor• according w 7 - 7.1, M . . ~:'