Star. — London, England, 1820-08-25 00:00:00

- • - ..: •t d , ~/ - , ~.%-•.'- Jr ._, ..,,,, U - ' ..." 4.. , -.. .4 . ...• . • - C.. .A. v. - • .1-. z - ... -%. ' , . . _ - " ' )01 ,i rl ...e- .e .-.. 4,4.:,.17 .-:-. . - 11. - -%; - $ - . .... _444 1 _ 1 lis -IL . -b z .„ xs.„o. . 4 . .„.........„ .... 0 .‘s:., . k , • . _ _ . . SU3IBER 10,453. CONTRACT FOR TIRE II EARTHS FOR REVENUE CRUIZERS. NAVY OFFICE, Aegusa 7, MO. THE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS and COMMlS sroyEks h%; ;LIJEST NA VI" do hereby gine Notice, That no WEDNFSDAY, the 30th Instant, at One o'clock, her will :le rettly to treat with such Persons u may be willing Contract for supplying his ...ktiesty's Yard at Woolwich with HEARTHS for RI: VENUE CILUIZERS. A Phaern of the Fire Hearths, and a Forns of the Tender, •s• bv seen at this Office. No Tender will bereceived after One o'oo4 on the day ef "i'r.rv•. - , nor any noticed, unless the party, or an agent for him, rt. nts. Every Tender must be accompanied by a Letter addressed to the Nary Board, and signed by two responsible Persons, en , g; - qing to become bound with the person tendering, in the sum oz . ;2.3V, for the due performance of the Confiner. " EAST-INDLI HOUSE, At!,lust 16, 1820. THE COURT of DIRECTORS ;il . ihe UNITED COMPANY if 41IERCHANTS of ENGLAND, trading to-the BAST-INDIES, do hereby give Arneice, That a QCART.ERLY GENERAL COURT of the said Cnmpany will be hell at their House in Lradenhall-street, on \VEDNESI)AY, the :27 th September next, at Eleven &noel in the For; rose. JOSEPH DART, Secretary. TNE QUEENS PUBLIC ENTRY INTO JERUSALEM. PHIS beautiful CAMNET PICTURE of the QUEEN'S PUBLIC ENTRY into JERUSALEM, r.;:•ted for her Ma.,-.r, and ,according to her Directions, by cel',lrattd Roman Artist, Can Loaf, is now exhibiting at SO, Pall Mall. Thts curious Composition contains Portraits of the Queen, of C:;;;Itir 13-:rg.,roi, of Young Austin, and of all the renlarkable 1 errltta in the retnt•rous Suite which accompanied her on this AsiraiLtalc.:, Oa. Slailinge—Descriptive Catalogues, Sixperc2. EDUCATION. ON MONDAY, August 7, Re-opened, after the Midsummer Itecass, the Seminary for a limited Number conducted by the Rev. JOHN EVANS. LLD. and sk) lute 4th University of Edinburgh, at Pullin 's-Row, I.:;;;L:ton.—Terms, Furty Guineas per Annum. No F.utrance. D4ncing, ..td Drawing, by Masters of Eminence. An ArUitiocal Cini:ge of Ten Guineas is made to a few Elder Pn !.,vita, finishing :sear Education, have a room assigned them, ..-•! , ..re Lectures are given them upon Logic, Rhetoric, Moral l'illosophy, and Evidences of the Christian Religion. Foreigners are accommodated, who wish to speak and write Language with accuracy. Dr. EVANS has had Ps its of tbitdeszription from France, Germany, and distant parts of the weilti. References to Dr. Abraham Rees, King's-road; Sir J. Per rin, Bart. Shaw and Barber, Cornbill; Astley Cooper, Esq. ;spring Gardens; Johin Cuope, Esq. Wititechapel; :Messrs. Trea cher and Sons, Paternoster-row; Mr. G. Hillclitch, Merezr, Lndgate•hill; Messrs. Grosvenor, Chaser, and Co. Cornbill; and to Profes4ors Leslie and Christison, in the University of Edinburgh.—See An I:iany on .Edasestion, by JOHN Evans, LL.D. Efth Edition. NEXT WEDNESDAY I QWIFT and CO. are selling the Tickets and Shares' 10 of the Yew Lottery, the whole of which will be drawn on the 30th of the present Month. This Lottery consists of only 5,600 Ticktts, and has Thirty Capitals, together with the due rroportion of small Prizes, making in the whole, £11;200 more than the usual amount of Prize Money for the same number of Tickets. All the Prizes in this Lottery arc of Sterling Money. Schemes at large at Swtrz and Co.'. Old and Fortunate Of fizes, No, 11, Poultry; 12, Charing-Cross; and 51, Aldgate ~111-street ICHARDSON, GOODLUCK, and Co. respect .l.li fay acquaint the Public. that the Niw Slam Lamar vi C,6uo Ti:kets, containing THIRTY CAPITAL PRIZES, . lICCLUDLN4 TWO £20,000, and Z 11,900 EXTRA PRIZE-MONEY, be drawn ix ma DA:. NEXT WEDNESDAY, the 50th - instant. Tizkets and Shares are sellini by Ric liA nosox, GOODzecz, and Cornhill; ar.d facing the gate of the King's i•Ltss, Charing-Crow; who sold in Shares, in February last, No. 7607, a Prize of ge.‘lo,ooo Money; aid in August last, No. 71 , :, a Prize of h'56,000 Consols, in a Whole Ticket. NEAR APPROACH OF THE DRAWING, 30ru or THIS MONTIL MARTIN and Co. having submitted the leadin features of the present Lottery to the Public, f great satisfaction to learn that it hai received their decided ap- By :laving no Fixed Prizes; By there being no Classes; By havirz no Stock Prizes; By all being drawn in One Day; By every Ticket deciding its own fate, and no other ; With only 5,600 Tickets, there are Two Prizes £20,000 ; All in Sterling Money ; Besides Twenty-eight others of £l,OOO, ESN, sC2OO, &c. r.IaTIN and Co. have only to hop?, that the same distin gzlihed preference will be given to their Offices that they have r:c.:ived for Thirty Lotteries past. No. 8, Cornhill, and 120, Oxford-street. TO THE PUBLIC. riiHE LAST ASSERTION is the most barefaced' It. of all the unblushing falsehoods uttered by Mr. Bass in his impnent attempt to evade and shuffle out of the detection and sr int: are with which I have felt it my duty to visit his conduct in the present Lottery. He says it is false" that the present PLA IN and HONEST IA) FTERY (as he calls it) is held in a coalition, or that ano ther W.ice-keeper is concerned with him.tkejisct is notorious in t , :t. City, and was OILHIED to be acknowledged by kinistyto his own subscribers as soon as the Lottery was taken ; it was also T:ONTeII by the ~ t he t• party hs the back ground, who deltas to be, and is consit!ered by ad the trec-knepers, as the joint Contractor with lit. in everything except signing he Bond at the Treasury, v;hich Witspirp.xxly avoided to deceive the Public. THAT PACT Is e 3.ily rranae.l, when it becomes neee.socry to give a man aficti i• us reput..tion, or bolster afellimg name with the Public; mato ; .hit:ve this obj.:et, Mr. Boa has clearly shewn that he winner'. Titelt, I and Justice; but if he offers again to iinpose Lilo 7'.s;,:ic by t: , :s ~ s sertion, I will call byname on those persons ho I .sow are MYTH MATSU Subscribers to the present Coati ;'ten Lottery, ti e,ivii.ce the Public of the truth of my statement -nd the falsehood of Lis Lleni3l. .Front this specim..n of Mr. Ilsn's terdi!:ole, when within inintedint7 and rati!ice contradiction, the Public will' of what rf-lianze ought to be placed on the tryt4 of his • )r.> When the means of detection are not so ready. But , :!:ea of his perock,e will be accomplished, if I suffer u! tic attend -at to be tiii•rsted from the merits of the pres!".it :.hen to—in which there are only 62 Tickets out of all the 5,600 wl.l<lt they can i , et t 1 it 'nonce/ back! by all the rest they st lose the er part of their money; to say nothing snore eut.Ar Leine altliough the Tickets were pur -1 for nearly NrcnYZN TIRACCAND PotNDS /CS! than the last T tr , t- are V.,•lf more rickets in the present Contract, for •• !1%. will he made as coon as this Lottery is over, 1 1 ;.!1 finds he is u 4.1/ icri.tyrt rtf:tx. hf.l may, perhaps, P , .:Air with A Bll'Elt S7IIE3IE IN A - FEW eiter the .;;nth Anzust) ; but if he does not, its de xportud to pu'ohc view. ;:e.) anti obEvi Servant, Cur:hia ; 2k;, 0w1..t....-s!: - Ln:t. 9 U. CA ftliOLL, st:Al CaLtraetor fur the Lottery just ended. FRIDAY, AUG USerfr,' TRIAL OF THE QUEEN. SEVENTH DAY—IN CONTINUATION. Emmination of Gaetano Paturze, concluded. Do you recollect whether, in day time, her Royal Highness sat or lay upon the bed under the tent?—Often. Where did the Princess take her siesta? (afternoon nap)-Bin the tent Did she, after dinner, lay or sit on the bed?—Yes, after dinner. Have you ever seen Bergami there at the same time in the I day time :—Yei. Have you ever received any directions during the day time when the Princess and Bergami were in the tent, as to closing it? —Yes. Have you, in consequence of those directions, closed the tent with the Princess and Bergami in it?—Yes. Did you do it frequently after dinner, or seldom?—ln the day I cannot say often, but in the week three or four times. Were the Princess and Bergami both inside the tent?—Both. How long, on those occasions, did the tent continue closed ? About half 411 hour—a quarter of an hour—an hour. Did you ever see the Princess and Bergami, on those occa sions, upon closing the tent, in their beds? Mr. DENUAN objected to this as a leading question. The SoetcrrOlt-GENKRAL—FII change the form.—Did you see the Princess on the bed in the day time when you closed the tent ?—Sometimes standing; sometimes on the bed. Wherowas Bergami?—For the most part laying on the small bed in the tent. Did you close the tent, leaving them so ?—Yes. Have you on those occasions seen Bergami come out of the tent ?—Yea. In what position have you seen Bergami laying on the bed? have you seen him lying on his back, or his side, or how?— • On his back. Do you remember, when you saw Bergami lying on his back, having eeceived directions from the Princess to close the tent? —I remember that Bergami was lying on his back. Her Royal Highness was sitting near him. Schievini was walking near the tent on the opposite side, and having received the order to close the ten:, I obeyed it. Did you in / consequence shut the tent with Bergami and the Princess there ?—Yes. Do you remember Bergami coming out ?—Yes, about a quar ter of an hour after, half an hour, or an hour. On the particular occasion to which you refer, do you recol lect Bergami afterwards coming out, and how long after was it? -About a quarter of an hour. D'al the Princess ever take a bath on board the vessel ?—Yes. Did she de it more than once ?—Yes. Do you remember her going below for that purpose ?—Yes. Who was below with her ?—Bcrgarni. Upon all the occasions which you remember of her going to take a bath, was she or not accompanied by Bergami? I have always seen her accompanied by Bergami, not only when she went to take a bath, but upon all other occasions. What were the other occasions upon which she went below? —Upon neceuttry occasiuns. Was she not always accompanied by Bergami whenever she went below ?—Yes. Have you seen at any time Bergami sitting on the deck ?—Yes. Have you ever seen the Princess with him upon those occa sions ?—i have seen Bergami sitting on a gun, and the Princess sitting on his knee—they were kissing each other. Was this kissing only once, or more than once, to your per sonal knowledge ?—More than once I saw than do it. When the Princess walked, whose arm did she take • or did site t a ke the arm of any one ?—She took the left arm of Bergami, and I never saw her take the arm of any one elie. Have you ever seen any tricks played by Bergami; anything jocular ?—I have. Did you ever see this in the presence of the Princess?— Yes, I have. Have you seen Bergami playing jocularly with the Princess? —Yes, I have, with sonic cushions. Where were those cushions placed ?—On his sea mach or paunch ! Do you know what it was meant to represent? Mr. Blest:einem objected to the question. but the Loan CHAN CZZLOR was in favour of us being put to wizuese The SoeterroaeGraseaee—Do you know what this was in tended to represent''—Bone apish tricks to make her Royal Highness and the other persons present laugh. The Smameent-Geemtat. said, this was not an answer to his question. M:. Baouoneet—lf the answer to the Learned Gentleman's -question dues not suit him he may ask it again. The question was again asked, when the witness said it was meant to represent buffoon' ry. Where did the Princess dine when the tent was placed on the decl. in the manner you have described?—Under the same tent. Who generally dined with the Princess under the tent?— Generally Bergami and the Countess Oldi. Whether those persons generally, or occasionally other per sons?—Sometimes alone—sometimes with William Austin. How was William Austin called by the Princess or in her presence ?—Sometimes he seas called William, sometimes Prin t/pine ; sometimes her Royal llighness, when eoing to bed, used to give hint tokens of affection, as a mother dues to her child. Duclag the time the Princess and Bergami slept on deck in the night, where did little Victorian sleep ?—As the room called the maids'-room contained two beds, when her Itoyal Highness slepe on deck one of the mends slept in the Princess's cabin, and Victurine slept with her. Do you mean in the cabin of the Princess, below deck, and adjoining the dining-room ?—Yes. What is Ikrgami's Christian name ?—Bartolome. On the Anniversary of St. Bartholomew, did anything parti cular take place?—Yes; the sailors had an allowance of a dollar each; they were very merry, and got drunk. flow did you address Bergami?—We called him Chevalier. While this was doing, what were the Princess and Bergami doing; were they together?--Bergami was walking the deck, applauding the sailors. The Princess was sitting in the tent. Do you remember seeing the Princess walking about?—Yes, I have seen her walking, she was not always sitting in the tent. Did they walk side by side, or arm in arm?—Arm in arm. Were you ever examined in Italy as to the conduct of the Princess and Bergami? Yes, I was. At what place ?--..At Milan. By whom, or before whom?—By the Advocate Vicamacarte. About what time ?—The latter end of December last year. Where did you go after this ?—To Naples. About your own affairs ?—Ye S. Were you applied to to come here ?—I was. Where?—At Naples. When were you so applied to ?-0n the 213 t of Jane last, when I was asked to come, and, as the journey was long, could not undertake it for some time, ou account of ill health. Mr. Wiemems objected to the course of the examination, but The LORD CHANCELLOR said the objection was not tenable. Witness—My ship was loaded on my own account. Crass-Zzarnined by Mr. Wateams.-e-When did you leave the ship in order to come here?—l have left off sailing, and given myself to trade, so that my ship wes loaded on my own account, and thatebip is now commanded by the Captain. Teen, if I understand right, you are now part owner?--I ant the owner. From what place did you come to England? Where were you when you set out?—At Naples. Is that the place to which you belong?—Naples is my native country, but I dwell on the cease Who was it that applied to you to come to this country?— The Minister sent a messenger to find me, because my commer cial others arc at Naples. Did you see the Minister?—Yes. W ho was it ?—The English Ambassador at Naples. Did you make any bargain with any one for what you are to have fur coming here?—Yes. With the Munster?--Yes; during the five days I was at Na ples, elide:mourn/it nut to come over to this country, I told I 'J2O: -- my circumstances to the English Minister, arfd he being con vinced of my situation, appointed to me 1,000 dollars a month. But I have lost already 4,000 dollars; the cargo I Cl= to Reggio not having been sold at the full value which I had advanced in this speculation before the Miniiter had applied to me and given me the appointment I speak of. Were you ever in England before this ?,—About eighteen months ago I was in England, not before that time. This is my itcondtime. Have you received any money, or is it in expectancy T—l hive received a month in advance at Milan. flow is it that your Captain could not go with your vessel williout you, and dispose of your cargo to advantage l—The Cap tain natiates the ship without me, but it is necessary that he should receive the orders from me personally. Did you leave your shlp, while she was performing her voyage, to come to this conntry ?—I did leave it when she was going to Reggio to discharge her cargo at Reggio. I afterwards learned that my ship had sold the cargo at tweilty-tlic-pence a bushel less than the value. Do you say, that if you had not come to England. there would be any difference in the price of the cargo ?—Yes ; if I lr:c1 not set out for England, I should have continued in my trade. I ad vanced money to buy - corn, and I should hare gained compensa tion for tha loss of 4000 dollars, which I made in lui6. How did your coming to England make any difference as to the pro& or loss of that voyage ?—I had ordered the Captain rot to 84.11 the cargo at less than 24 charlir:es a bushel. The Captain sold it at 21, upon learning that I had tuk;:i: my de parture. After my arrival here, I heard it reached 26 charlines, and since that I learned that it reached 7.0. Do you mean to say that your arrival here affected the price of corn ?—(Crics If Order, Crder). Mr. NV:Luasts strbmitted that this question naturally arose out of the answer he had just received. The LORD CH ANCELLOR • observed, that the L-_-arned Counsel was at liberty to ask it. Mr. Wintusts expressed a hope that interruptions of this kind would nut be repeated. He had been in the habit of addressing the Courts below, which were not accustomed to express their opinions by acclamation. As their Lordships hid pluilgtAi them selves to adhere to the rule by which those events were regu lated, he trusted that this very important arrangement would not he 11 , ...&ected. The Marquis of DOWNSIIIRE observed, that cntainly it would be the most advisable course to abstain from interrupting Counsel by acclamations. If any of ;heir Lordships objected to a question, it would be the better course to state the objection. With the exception of interruptions of this kind, the deepest silence should prevail—( Hear, hear). Lord LIVERPOOL agreed in this proposition, which seemed to be the general feeling of the House. Mr. Wituaus did not press the question. Qnestion.—Then I am to conclude that your Captain dis obeyed your order with respect to the cargo ?—This disobe dience would not have happened had I been present. It would have been a disobedience if be had done so if I had been pre sent ; but he could not bare foreseen what I might have done if I had been present, and he therefore acted from him elf. When did he disobey you ?—When I set out for England. When you made the bargain for the 1000 dollars a month, did you foresee anything of this loss?-1 have always foreseen it, for I have not wished to come here, both on account of my health, and on account of my interest. What distance is Reggio from Naples ?--By land above ZOO When did you see Patuizo upon your arrival in London? — Two days ago. Did you not see hint yesterday ?—I had not seen him for IS months till then. X ask you did you net see bins yesterday ?--Last night we supped together. Did you breakfast with him to-day ?--I took coffee with him this morning. Have you had no talk with him as to the evidence be gave here ?—No : he would not tell me, except I'd ask him. Did you inquire about what had occurred during this exami nation ?—No. What then did you mean by saying he would not tell you ? I meant by saying "be would not tell me," that "he cannot told ;" the subject is of such a nature chat it could not he told. Did any one say you were not to speak unto Patulzo about what he said here?—Nro, I told Patuizo so myself, of my own accord. Do you mean to say that you told Patulzo that you and he were not to speak of what had occurred yesterday ?—Yes. Did you say It was not fit to talk of it, to Patulao?—Yes, upon this matter. Had you no curiosity to learn what sari of man the Attorney. General was, and Mr. Solicitor-General, who was to examine you ?—That was nothing to me. All my attention was that I was to t•.iake my appearance before this House. Have you been in this room before ?—Yes, but there were no Gentlemen here. When ).ere you here ?—On Saturday. Who same with you ?—A Gentleman, who brought me to show me where the Coronation was to take place. Was he an Englishman ?—Ycs ; I know his person, but not his name. _ _ [Here the witness was desired to look round and ascertain whether he could see the Gentleman. He did so, but could not see him]. ' He continued.—l have seen him many times, but always transitorily. I did not see him at Milan, nor until I arrived in England on the 14th instant. I was examined . at Milan and In England, but at the latter place it was a verbal examination. The examination was before a Gentleman whom I do not know. Certainly not the Gentleman who shewed me this place. Here Mr. Witrums desired witness to turn about his eyes and point out the person who bad examined him in England. The witness pointed out a Gentleman who stood near the King's Attorney. General. Witness continued.—l came to this country accompanied by the King's Messenger, who paid my expenses from Naples to this country. I saw C'olonel Brown before I came to this coun try. was examined in his presence at Milan. My answers were, I believe, put down. I did not swear to the truth of them, but I put my name to the end of the paper. 'rhe Earl of LI VER POOL suggested, that if any Noble Lord should wish to examine a witness, be should put the whole of the questions he wished to ask, before any other Noble Lord asked any question. This would save much inconvenience that had been felt on the preceding day, . . - • Earl GREY wish - ed to know what pay the witness received from her Royal Highness during the time she was in the vessel? —Seven hundred and fifty dollars per month. What is the expense of navigating such a vessel ?—I can say much on that subject. My crew consisted of _a persons, at ten dollars per month each. Having so many hands, I required much provision, which wits dear. The wear and tear of the vessel is much; and when we have a Royal Person on board, we are obliged to keep everything In better order than is usual; and if you take into consideration that the ship cost me 10,000 dollars, the insurance of which is one per cent. you will see that there is hardly anything left out of the 750 dollars. The Marquis of LANSDOWN.—As the witness was disap pointed in his remuneration, did he apply for compensation to the Princess or to any person of her suite?—No; I did not, be cause she dismissed me. The Princess commanded (seha al -ways commanded whit liergami commandi d) us to go to Vs nice, but I refused. When we left Rhodes we went to Candia. After leaving Candia we were without water, and it was neces sary to land. The Princess woold not return to Candia, and we were therefore obliged to go to Sicily, and from thence pro ceeded to Naples. When we landed at Naples llergami ntised me 6000 dollars by way of reward, though the Co •sul tit Venice told tr.e it was not ready for me because I wiuld not convey the rancess to Venice. Did you apply to any oth. r person for remuneration ?—Tea, I did ; when I was in London last year, I presented a memorial to the British Government through our Ambassador, stating that, as I served a rich Government, having borne the English flag in the voyage, I expected the compensation which I al not receive. When you were on board the vessel, did you orJer any person PRICE S E‘'EN-PES'. to withdraw from that part of the vessel where the Princess and Berganti were ?—I do not retnemlr. After the tent, in which were the Princess and Ber : Tami, was shut, were there any other persons on deck but the witness it-No, How did he know Bergami was in the tent all night?—Becaose he was in the tent when it wa ; The witness.saw him in it at rii ht and in the morning, but did he see Bergami in the intermediate time?—No. Was there• any communication from the tent with any other part of the ship without going on deck ?—Thtre was a Coll3llllh. nication with the dining-room by a ladder. Could Bergami leave the tent by that ladder?—Yes, he might although the passage was small. Lord ELLENBOROUGH wished to know if Bergami had any b:•d prepared for him after the ship left Jaffa?—Yes, when it was bad weather Bergami slept below. When Bergami slept below, Oil the Princess remain on deck ?—No. The Earl of ROSF.D Rl' enquired if any other person slept below?—Yes, Caeiri and otbei Lord A UCKL.I NlX—Was the 730 dollars per month to defray the espf.n3es of navigation?--I took the 730 dollars per mmth, thinking it certain pay; but when we have a Royal pct. son on board, trust more to the uncertain than the certain. Upon this uncertainty I was disappointed ; and I mado it known to the English Government, who thus knew that I could be a witness. If the witness had been In the habit of ordering men to with draw from that p•:rt of the :•essel, would he not have renum bered it ?—I rcmcml•r'r once, on seeing her Royal Highness seated on the bed with I3ergami, I did order Patulzo to go i.way, as he being a young man, it was not fit he ::Lould be present. On that occasion, when you desires' fart+'z•., to i;,•J t7rere any other persons near?—Yes, th,:re wen: other p...rsu; s who walked that way; but I divided them, and ordered one to go one way, and ono another. - You ordered them all to go away?—Yes, all, exce.rt some who were under the commar,,l of her RoyA Uighur, s. 111 there any of her Royal I slitc vres.:ll ; St:4.2nd Cr as-examination of MA:rrco. When their Lordships had coaciodLd their examination of Vincenzo, _ . BROUGIIAM wished that the witness Majocco should be recaUtd, as he had an important question to put to him. Some conversation ensued as to the propriety of granting this request; but it was ultimately agreed to, and Theodore Ma.. jocco called In. When the witness was placed at the bar, he addressed some words in a very vehement tone to their L ordships. The Inter preter said they meant, that he would lay down his life if their Lordships found anything incorrect in his testimony. Mr.listouomsas then proceeded to examine the witness : Were you ever at Bristol during the last year ?—No. Were you ever at Gloucester?—Gloucester I know well. Ware you in the servica of a person named Hyatt ?—Yes. Did you ever declare to any person that the P. incess of Wales was a most excellent woman ?—Yes, that the Princess was a good woman. _ _ Did you ever declare that the conduct of the Princess of Wales was highly becoming ?—I always said she was a good woman, but surrounded by canaelia. Did you ever say that she was a prudent person, and that you had never obsA-v.:d anything improper in her c..mduct ?—I do not remember at all whether I ever said so. Did you ever say that she had always behaved herself wills propriety ?—This I never sail. • 1)o you remember a Gentleman of the name cf William Hughes, at Gloucester?—Questo nest mi ricordo ! Du you know a person who was a clerk in the banking-house of Turner, at Gloucestcr?—l know not the name of this hatlis jug-house. Had you ever any cenversation with the Clerk of a Bank in-house at Gloucester ?--Qtsests svm me ric,tyl) ! Did you ever complain to acv hotly at Gloucester, that Ber gami had kept any part of the servants' wages from them?—Yes. To whom did you make tlis camplaint ?—Precisely I do nut remember ; but 431 r. Hyatt asked ale -.eby I left the service of the Princess? and I remember I said, that after my return from a long voyage, Bergami wished even to lower my wages. Did you ever say the same to any body else i'--Questo nun mi records ! • [After some other questions of no importance]. Did you ever say to the son of Mr. Hyatt', hoLF,cke,.per, Mrs, Hughes, that her (Loyal !highness was a mast exceilciit woman, a prudent woman, and that you had never seen imy thing im proper in her conduct ?—Quarto nun nu record,' / bid you ever representto this young man that the Princess of Wales always, as far as you had ever seen her, behaved in a most proper manner ?—Quesio nos nti rec, rdo Did you ever travel in a stage coach between Gloucester and Bristol, or between Gloucester and any other place?,---1 re member to have travelled from Gloucester to London. Did you ever make a journey in a stage coach from Glouces ter to any other place ?—Questo own mi recto do ! Were you ever asked by any Gentleman in a stage coach re.. specting the deportment of the Princess of Wales when you were in ber service ?— , Questo mare nu record° ! Did you represent her, to any person in 3 stage-coach as be having herself very prudently ?—Questo non mi ricord.: Did you represent the Princess of Wales to any person in ai stage-coach-as a much-injured woman ?—rho ,son mi recordo, no more than yesterday. Did you represent to a person in a stage-coach, that you had been asked to swear against her Royal Highness?.—What I re member of these things is, that I never spoke any of them. Did you represent to any person, in any place, that you had been applied to to swear against the Princess ?--I do not know what you mean by the word swear. The question Was repealed.---I do not know what the word means. Mr. Baswastax reiterated the question, altering the word swear into " to give an account of the Prince s s of Wales urns oath."—No, (with great force). Did you ever say to a Mr. Johnson in a stage-coach, that you had been applied to to appear as a witness against the Queen?— ' I'll swear that I tio not know the name of this man; I do not know either the name or the circumstances you speak of. Did you ever say so' to any person, words. to that effect ?-- Mai (never)! (with great emphasis, lifting up his hands, and striking them forcibly on the bar.) Did you ever say to Mr. Johnson, or any other person lo England, in a stage-coach, that you had beer. cffered consider able advantage if you would be a witness against the Queen ? I will lay down my life, this offer never has been made to me. (With great fury of countenance and violent gesticulation). The LOR l) CITA NCELLO II observed, that the question was not whether he had been applied to, or whether he had raid he was applied to. The Interpreter was desired to explain par . ticulatly to the witness the difft reuse. Atter a colloquy of some length between the Interpreter and witness, the following an swer was extracted : " I will lay down my IVe I never said so."---( With still greater vehemence than beiore'e Did you ever shy to Mr, Johnson, in a stage-coach, that you 4act been offered a suns of money or a situation under Govern ment to give evidence against the Princeis of Wa-:es ? I do not know even the name of ;sir. Johnson ! ( kiqilnds it;:). The same question was repeated, with the sabstiretion of tne word "anybody" for Mr. Johnson. The answer to this question was given with a vehemence ex ceeding all this witnesses previous exhibit!ens. With "flay in his eye," and striking both hands violertly on the bar, he reel - lin...rd. " I will lay down my Ire I never raid so, and to you Iw. l an tire no more, because you ask me questions ab.net things I never streams 4 . —what never entered into my frrid." The cross-examination of Muj.cco having conbluded at t a - - past four o'clock, lArd LIVERPOOL moved an adjournment, but the general wish of the House being toga on, it was agreed to call another witness. F.rwriscoßereo, who had lived in the service of her Ro:-al Highness as cook, was then called and examined by Mr. Pas None of the facts deposed to by him, tip to we o'clock, we-. Of much importance, and at that hour his further exaerinetion was adorned Era to-morrow.