Star. — London, England, 1827-06-18 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Joie 14. IN MR MATTER OP SLINGSBY. Mr. SUDDEN, at the sitting of the Court, complained that Messrs. Hurd and Johnson, Solicitors of that Court, felt themselves aggrieved in conseqnence of an expres sion which had been dropped concerning them by Mr. Montagu, a lew days ago. Mr. Montt/ton said, he meant no disrespect to those Gentlemen, by saying that they viers sharp practitioners. It was rather a matter of praise than of blame that they were so ; and although he admitted he did not mean to praise them for what they had done on the occasion which drew from him that observation, yet, if he were to be in the situation of a suitor, by some unfortunate circumstance (which, however, he hoped to avoid), be would rather avail himself of their services than of any other persons. The LORD CHANCELLOR had always understood the firm to be a respectable one. in a subsequent part of the day, Mr. MONTAGU moved for an injunction to stay the sale of the bank rupt's effects. Mr. SUDDEN said, he was obliged to oppose this ap plication, for be held in his hand a letter from Man chester, stating that the sale had actually taken place. Mr. MONTAGU then would shape his motion so that the removalvf the goods might be prevented by the order of the Court. After some discussion between the Counsel, the Loan Cuarsic neon refused the application. MARSH AND IAUNTLIROY'S BANKRUPTCY. Mr. HORNE was induced to mention this case to the Court on account of the great sum which depended on its decision—not less than 250,000 L—and because 18 other cases would be determined by it. The Bank of England was willing to act, but could not do so without the authority of the Court. The LORD CHANCELLOR directed it to be heard on Saturday next. Vaasa& CORPUS. Mr. SPXIICE applied for the discharge of a Bankrupt, Thomas Reed, who bad been sent to prison by the Com mistioners. The ground on which he moved was, be cause the answers which the bankrupt had given, were, he contended, perfectly satisfactory, and did not justify his commitment. He had been examined five several times, and the Learned Counsel read the whole of his examinations and answers as they appeared on the re turn. The Bankrupt had several shops in different places near London. Among others be had one at Chatham. Two months before the act of bankruptcy bad been committed, he made an assignment of this shop and the effects in it to his brother, Howell Reed, who had lent him various sums of money. ' The main object oldie examination was to' ascertain whether the bankrupt or his brother knew, at the time of this assign ment, that be was about to become insolvent ? It ap peared that the bankrupt had in one of his letters said be would 64 floor the concern." On his examination he denied that this meant to ruin the concern. For this answer, and for previous ones, which were alleged to be prevaricating, he was committed. The Learned Coun-1 sel argued that, from the vagueness of the slang cepa:- Won he had used, it was not so apparent that be had any improper intention as to justify his being committed: Mr. Ross was on the other side, ind expressed great surprise that this case should be brought forward, and still greater surprise that his Learned Frimsd(nra feyness) should have laboured the point respecting the Bank rupt's expression. It was imposdblo to give anrothet interpretation to that expression than had been pelt on it by the Commissioners. Everybody knew tehal:it meant ; and after his late experience In electioneering , he was quite astonished that his Learned F ri en d should affect ignorance of what 6 , being • floored" was. The Learned Counsel sieved that the commitment was per fectly justifiable. Mr. KNIGHT was on the same side, but did MK think it necessary to add any thing. Mr. Statics replied, and said it seemed that the Commissioners bad sent this Bankrupt to prison, not because he had given them unsatisfactory answers, but because they thought his conduct deserved pu nishment. This, he contended, was an excess of au thority, and that upon the face of the commitment the Bankrupt was entitled to his discharge. The LORD CIiANCILLOR said it did not appear that tl , e Commissioners had done any more than their duty. They had put no question they were not authorised to put, and he thought Mr. Sience had no right to im pute to them that they had exceeded their authority. • Mr. Suttee submitted he had a right to ttate the case as best suited his client's interest. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, he had, so far as the evidence supported him, hut not by circumstances which were purely imaginary. Mr. SPENCR urged the hat dship which the Bankrupt laboured under 'by means of this commitment. He bad already been in prison three months, and might be there much longer, if the Court did not interfere. The LOAD CHANCELLOR said, it was in his power to procure his liberation at any time by giving a true account of his affairs. His Lordship saw no reason at present [or granting his discharge. COURT OF ICING'S BENCH, Jima 16. THY LING AGAINST THE LORD SIATOiI AND ALDER. MEN OF LONDON. _ The rule calling — upon the defendants to shew cause why a mandamus should not bir issued directing them to swear in Mr. Sheriff Winchester, was enlarged, upon the motion of Mr. J. Parke. CRIMINAL IYPORMATION. The ATTORN6Y-GCNERAL moved for a criminal in formation against Rigby Wason, Esq. at the instance of Mr. Charles Dawson, an Attorney of the Court. Mr. Wason made proposals of marriage to the daughter of a Gentleman who consulted Mr. Dawson upon the oc casion, and instructed him to make inquiries respecting Mr. Wason's property. Mr. Dawson accordingly waited upon Mr. Wason, who mentioned amongst other pro perty., a piece of ground at Liverpool wheteun Imam might, be thought, be built to produce a rental of /at per annum. The next day Mr. Dawson vcrote - a letter to Mr. Wason, that he conld,nis heletelistrusting this calculation. Mr. Wescott.. in reply, 'riche' that it Mr, Dawson doubted his word. ht might see the documents, which would shew his statement to be correct. Mr. • Dawson answered, that Mr. Wason must hot mistalien The meaning of his letter ; that be did not ate all dolltit his word, but had the highest opinion of hit hon. r. However, Mr. Wason, in reply, thought fit tetylite letter complained of, which Mr. Dawson received .on the last day of lAA tei ip. It wus to, the following effect: -• •••=1." On referting to the. letter I wrote in auswer io yeur first, you will perceive lre.itvesi to myself the liberty of answering it again in a very different manner. The a • reason I so long abstain'd from so doing was the fear' of giving another excuse toohe father of the Lede feu not consenting to our marriage. You are a liar and a villain; and as there are circumstances that prevent our meeting in this country, I now inform you that I shall be in Calais in Whitson week; and if yogt cowardice is not equal to your 'litany, you will be there to give me satisfaction.'—Rule to shew cause granted. • THE KING O. RAMSDIN AND OTHRR.S. • The Comoros SERGEANT applied (or a rule to shew cause why there should not •be-a new trial in this mat ter, which was an indictment for a conspiracy, and wit tried at Guildhall before Lord Tenterden at the le* sitting. The indictment consisted of two counts: first. that the parties bad conspired to cheat divers creditors of Ramsden, and in pursuance of the conspiracy had sued out a commission of bankrupt against him ; second, that the patties had falsely and fraudulently conspired to sue out the commission. The ground on which he, the Common Sergeant, moved was, that improper evi dence had been admitted. A commission of bankrupt had been produced, which, as it was not enrolled, could not be received in evidence ; but an assignment under it had been received. Lord TENDIRDIN—III my charge to the Jury I stu diously avoided taking any notice of the assignment. 1 The Coniston SERGEANT—The Attorney-General, for the prosecution, endeavoured to give secondary evidence of the commission. William Smallwood was an important witness, who was himself indicted and acquitted. Lord TIINTERDIIII—The parties might be guilty of conspiring to sue out a commission, though no em eticwas issued. COMMON SERGEANT—The assignment, without a commission, was nothing, because it does not appear that those who am in the assignment styled Commis. sioners are really Commissioners. Several of the pro ceedings, such as proofs of debts and other matters, were brought forward; but if there were no commission, there could have been no proceedings. The conclusion of the Jury was through the medium of that which ought not to be admitted; and although the assign ment wasnot stated in the charge to the Jury, still the impression which its admission may have made upon them cannot be calculated. Lord TENTERDENIt is impossible for my brothers to understand this case without bearing all the report of the trial read. That this May not be done twice, the Court will neither grant zor refuse your rule, but the objection shall be open to you when the parties are brought up for judgment. THE ZINO V. JOHN HANGER. This defendant, who was arrested on the Lord Chief Justice's warrant upon an indictment for blasphemy, found against him at the Old Bailey yesterday, was brought up to plead to the indictment. He complained that he was taken up early in the morning as he was •going to his employment; if he had been aware of it, he would have been provided with bail, and he thought it hard he should be kept in confinement until the ex piration of the time for notice of bail.* Mr. Justice BATLEY asked him if he could now give notice? but he was not prepared with the names of his bail ; and Lord TENTERSEN said it was not in their-power to do any thing ; so, after pleading Not Guilty, he was taken away in custody. COURT OF COMMON ?LEAS, .7662 16. , Mr. Justice PARK sat for a short time in this Court this morning, in the absence of the other Judges, to take justifications of bail, and to dispose of such motions as might be unimportant. HIGH COURT OF 15FILRGATBIS, Jon ti. IRMO AGAINAT BRISCO. The argument in this case, which was part heard last term, closed this day. The details have been repeatedly before the public nape ad nauseam. The original snit was instituted by Lady Brisco in the Consistory Court , Canteibury, for a divorce by reason of adultery cons trained by her husband, Sir Wastel Brisco, who, in turn, sued his Lady on a similar ground, to which she replied by an allegation of cruelty. The sentence pronounced by the Judge in the Court below, in an interlocutory proceeding, was appealed to this Court, where the case has been long depending, partly on account of the non payment of costs and alimony decreed against Sir Was te!. whereby he was in contempt. • After hearing Mr. Kowa; with whom were Dr. JENNER and Dr. Pioneers, on behalf of Lady Brisco, and Dr. PHILLIMoRE in reply, the Court was cleared, and the Judges remained in consultation nearly two hours. On the admission of Counsel and strangers, Lord Chief Justice BEST, • who presided, stated that although their Lordships had not drawn out the sen tence in form, he had to announce that they were of opinion that Lady Brisco was batied from a divorce on the pound of adultery on the part of Sir Wastel. On ,the other point, relative to cruelty, the Corot had a t irong opinion, and it was for Counsel to say whether hey wished to proceed. After sonic discussion, the argument was renewed upon the whole case. Dr. JENNER, Dr. PICKARD, and Mr. KNIGHT were heard on behalf of Lady Bribe°, and Dr. Patuonione for Sir Waste!. The Court was again cleared, and on beings... the Registrar read the sentence, namely that their Ila ships were of opinion that Dame Sarah Brisco had failed in establishing her case, and that Sir Wastel had failed also in his; and that they dismissed both parties (on payment of alimony by S r Waste)); the subject of costs to be considered at the next Court. The common Law Judges in the commission were the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, Mr. Justice Burrough, Mr. Justice Littledale, Mr. Justice Gaselee, Mr. 114ron . Garrow, and Mr. Baron Hullock. Dr. Lee sat as or,e of the delegates, but the topics upon which the Learned Advocate has lately dissented la the Court of Condelegates were not touched upon nvhilst the Court was open. LORD MAYOR'S COURT, JoAt 16. TROSIIIMTION OF THU CIIILORIO Or CHILLS/WI COSTIMLTS /ROM JUDAISM TO WORT 00 TOADS 10 TOR CITTe—THR LORD MAYOR ♦ND CORIVRAItOII OF TOO CITY OF 1000011 11. RAUL AND OROTIIIa. Mr. HOLLAND Appeared as Counsel for the City of London in four different actions, instituted against the defendants, S. Saul and his brother, who are respectable butchers in Whitechapel market, to recover four dif. ferent penalties of s'. each from the defendants, for hsv ingaarzied on trade in the City without being freemen. The-public were some time ago made acquainted with the particulars of this case, and, from its not har ing been heard of recently, it has been generally pre- sumed, that an application made to the Coust ot Al des men in their behalf bad been successful, and that they were admitted to their freedom. It will be ne c'essary to restate that the father of the defendants, %bp resided in Old Gravetlane, was born and educated a Jew. Although in ♦ery indigent circumstances, !lie was considered a man ot much learning And fesearth, which citcumstatice may account in sonic mouse for his dissent from the religion of his ancestors.-- fie expressed that dissent in the • most open and public manner. He carried on business with his sins during the Jewish Sabbath ; he observed none f their fasts, paid nothing to tile High Priest, and bought and sold pork. He did so far yield to the ,weakness and superstition of his wife, as to permit his two sons to undergo the ceremony of circusncision.— Eriwever, after her death. he brought them up as Chris tians ; they served their apprenticeships to Christian masters, married Christian wives, and had their chil dren baptiz d and in every respect educated in the most exemplary manner as Christians. Whilst they were poor, little notice was taken of the defendants ; but when their industry made diem respectable. and brought them trade as butchers in.Whitechapel market, others of the Whitechapel butchers began to entertain con scientious scruples, whether persons whom they chose to stigmatize as not being such prim Christians as them selves should be permitted to remain amongst them?- -Informations were lodged against the defendants, aid they were sued in the Lord Mayor's Court. They ap pealed from a grievous prosecution upon twenty-four penal actions to the Court of Common Council. That body referred the case to the Court of Aldermen, re commending them to admit the defendants to take up their freedoms on their complying with the proper forms. The case was argued recently in the latter Court with closed doors. Sir Peter Laurie spoke with great zeal in their favour, but the following standing order of the Court, dated slay 3, 1783, was advanced against him : " Resolved unsohnously, That it is the opinion of this Court it is neither politic nor advisable in this Corporation to admit baptized Jews into the freedom of this City, and that it he observed as a standing order." Sir Perna LAUltfn, without entering into a discus sion of the metits of the above order, contended, that however applicable it might have been to the father of the defendants, it was preposterous to apply it to the defendants themselves ; 'bey having, from their infancy, received the light of Christianity, not being therefore baptized Jews. The Court, however, thought otherwise, and resolved to let the prosecutions take their course, and enforce the standing order. Under these circum stances, four of the actions brought against the too de fendants came on for trial in this Court, when Mr. Carter, their attorney, handed in a writ of habeas to remove the trial of the cause to the Court above. Mr. Bot.Laton objected to the validity of this process, and read the following clause of the 21 Jac. 1. cap. 23. sec. 4. which declares, that if the sum sought to be re covered in any inferior Court of Record " do nut amount ' to or exceed the sum of five pounds , then s u ch crease shall not be stayed or removed by any writ or writs whatever, other than writs of error or attaint. And if any writ or .writs shall be granted or sued forth con- Amy to the intent and meaning of this Act, the Judges of the inferior Court may disallow and refuse the same. " The Learned Gentleman called upon his Lordship to refuse the writ. 1 1 Mr. Carter said they were now taken by surprise, by means of this very unusual objection. The Recoapsa said he should proceed to tryst e causes notwithstanding the habeas. After the recent; very full discussion of the case in the Court of Alder. men, be could not have imagined that the parties could be taken by surprise. However, that they might mate every preparation in their power for their defence, be would put off the trials until the next Court day. The cases were adjourned accordingly. GUILDHALL. Saturday, at Guildhall, a journeyman tailor, was charged with detaining a quantity of cloth, which had been entrusted to him to work up, for a master sweep and his two apprentices. It seems the tailor had deeply taken to hurt the elopement of his wife, and had acquired a habit of lotting, and when he took the cloth home. be first cut off a quantity as his cabbage, to make a pair of trousers foe himself, although cautioned by a brother snip that such a step would leave an insuficient quantity to complete the boys' suits, which, in fact, proved too little, and the master's cost, when nearly finished, he left with his landlord, as security upon a loan of I!. The poor sweep, therefore, was completely disappointed. but eves now he hoped the prisoner might net be &ale severely ,with, on account of his domestic calamity. The rinser thought the Magistrate had no jurisdiction in such matters, and refused to come to any terms until he was liberated. Mr. Alderman Awns, however, on the lidt ' section of the Pawnbrokers' Act, condemned him to pay the value of the cloth and trimmings not restored by hint to the owner, and pay a fine of Ws. (together .C 2 10s. ad.) and in default of imme diate payment to be committed to hard labour for two months; and if within three days of the expiration of that term the forfeitures were not paid., then to be well whipped in public. The prisoner could not pay the money, and was committed. BOW-STREET. Saturday --- lasses, of Round-court, in the Strand appeared to sheer cause, why be was not liable to pay the premium to which the Fireusen,who bring the first engine to a plate where a fire breaks out, are entitled under the Act of Parliament. It was established that a chimney in the house In which the defendant , had been on fire. Defendant claimed to be excused, first,round that the fire had been extinguished long before any engine appeared ; and secondly, that he was only a lodger ; and as such, he was not within the operation of the Act. The Act expressly mentioning " The Owner of the Dwelling-house." And as it could not be eon traded that a lodger we. an owner,it followed that he was not liable. The Magistrate, however, thought it quite sufficient that the person sought to be made chargeable, was ahewn to reside in the house, and to be the accepter of the particular pan of It, in which the fire begun • and accordingly ordered the defendant to pay half the sum specified in the Act. As a notion obtains among uninformed per sona, perhaps,the giving publicity to this decision, may induce greater circumspection on the part of lodgers, and prevent many of those evils which but too frequently flow from carelessness. It appears by recent accounts that the Wesleyan Mis sionaries to New Zealand have been roughly handled by the natives. In consequence of some misunderstanding in January last, the Chiefs of the Island made an attack upon them; they Bed, leaving their property behind Ahern, and arrived with their families at the Bay Islands, ha►ing nothing but the clothes in which they were dressed. When they arrived at the Bay, their wants were supplied by the Church of England Missionaries. These unfortunate persons purposed sailing in a few days for New South Wales. Mr. William Gardner, farmer, in the parish of Saiatbury, Gloucestershire, who, whilst in the act of tying up a fleece of wool, was suddenly seised with a giddiness in his head, and expired almost immediately.,, Monday evening, Mrs. Harryman, the wife of Mr. Thomas Harryman, of East Mailing, had walked to Wateringbuty, to visit a friend at that place, and had just entered her friend's house, when she complained of feeling an acute Fain near her heart, and falling back wards, instantly ezpited. .Yesterday se'nnight as Mrs. Llogben, of Chalkwell, near Sitcingbourne, w.. 1 going to the evening service at Sittingbourne Church, she felt herself unwell, and called at a neighbouring home at the top of the street, where, in a few minute•, she became worse. and in less than ball an hour expired. Her friends Who so shortly before had seen her in the enjoy metil f perfect health, to their iitespieiatble isioui:.hrner.t and gild,- beheld htr con veyed home a lilekss cut p.e. likk CORONER'S INQUESTS. . SAtorday an Inquest was held at the Green Man, Stratford, on the body of Mr. Grant, late a Lieutenant in the 42d Highlanders. It. appeared by the'esidence that on Wednesday the deceased passed through tke turnpike on horseback, and turning round, app4r e n t i r I t o pay the toll, when a Stamford stag 'coach coming up, one of die %Oriels came in contact with his hotels bind legs, and both the horeand his rider were throe's. Mr. Grant fell under the coach, the hind wheel of which passed over his body, and killed him on the spot...:. Verdict—Accidental Death. The Coroner observial that mot the slightest blame could attach to the d r iv e of the stage. • An Inquest was held at the Westminster It spinal o * the body of T. Carty, two years old, whom it appea le a the , mother had left, whae she went out on an errand,ie the care of a sister, three years old, who suffered it to play with some lighted paper, by which its clothes were ignited, and the body so much insured that the child died within two hours after being taken to the Rospi. tal. Verdict—Accidentally burnt to death through the negligence of the parents, in leaving him under an ilia peeper guardian. carpenter in the Tuesday, whilst Mr. John Wood, a new works at Sheerness, was in the act of boring a hole with asiatugur, he ruptured a blood vessel, and died on the spot. A melancholy accident occurred on Tuesday, the sth instant, to Mr. John Bolton, an opulent coach proprietor. lately landlord of the Nortolk Hotel, Nor wich, which terminated fatally. Mr. Bolton and Mr. Whincup, Jun. of Stamford. had been to Leicester 4 a gig, and mere returning to Melton, when about sit miles from the latter place Mr. Bolton was ptecipi. toted from the gig, and pitched upon his head; he was -conveyed to the George Hotel at Melton, and sanguine hopes were entertained of his recovery until about three o'clock on Sunday se'nnight, the 10th imam, when erysipelas took place, and terminated his eattbly career, about twelve the same day, in the 60th year of his age. HEBDOMA.DARY. Tats Day—The giorioos Battk of Waterloo. to-mossow—The Sun rhea at 42 minutes put three. ]data Charm signed, Md. WAZOlSDAV—Tranalatioa a the remains of Edward, King et tie West Simms, from Wareham to Salisbury, three Tun aver tut decease. Tatommay—The learn day. The Battle of Vittoria, Fame—Soo sets 17 miasma past eight. Sagoonmr—St. Jolla's Eve. Midsummer Rea MEETINGS OF CREDITORS, lIASINGHALIASTEIitt. 10611011 LOW. a. a. J. Paterson, Brett's-buildings, Camberwell, dealer . slt T. Charlesworth, Patriot•square, Bethnal-green, tenthaler 3it W. H. Bray, Brighton, Sussex, draper . 10 J. Cox, Leadenhall-street, victualler . t s 3St G. Smith, Henry-street, Waterloo-road, grocer . 3it G. Pennell, Flndyer.street, Westminster, plena, deg* 3it R. T. Bishop, Birmingham,. woollen draper . IS MC*, Sackville-street, Ptccadilyy, tailor • • # A..C. Mush, Great Scotland-yard, navy agent . . Is 4. &ebbs. Penton-street, Leicester-Keefe, jeweller . 3 IS IL Hague, Shoretlitch, linendreper . • . II J. L. Hera. Market-row, Oxford-market, Timelier 6 2is It. &rubell a But Poloulsey, Surrey, carpenter . J. Webb.. &raid ? Glouoestersbire, draper . . II T. Tarratt, *A, hiberdasher . T. H. Worrell, St. lobn•strset, West Smithfieldowlsw user. 211 G. Benet& and Co. tkivei•street; !Piccadilly. hotel-keepers I la J. Joyce and Co. Smith-street, Northampton-aqua -- merchant • • • • • T. T. Balsam. Bread-street, Cbeapside, lace dealer %V: !hugger and Co. Caine; Wiltshire, clothiers t, Cole, Ease Stonehoese, Plymouth, plumber ninamoiss. . r . ▪ tOr . I n 11 . T. Toy, Peery?, Cornwall, grocer • . . H. Thorrington and Co. Battle:bridge Wharf, coal mer. t C. Tamer, Horton Kirby, Kent, farmer . . It R. Straclearn, Lame-street, ship broker . . I W. Dodd, Liverpool, paper hanging manufacturer . It W. Gathard, Cheapside, tailor . 10 W. Jones, Loyell's•court, Paternoster-row. bookseller . la O. Cos, Little Britain, banker • • . . Io H. H. Stansfeld, King-street, Cheapaide, stuff manufacturer 11 J. Nesbitt and Co. Aidermanbury, merchants . la MARRIED, Saturday at St. George's, Hanoven4quare Edward &rink/ Portman, Esq. M.P. for toreetshire, to Lady Renmi Lanier, third daughter of the Earl and Countess of Harewood. The Sul and Countess of Sheffield, the Earl and Countess of Hareweial. Mr. and Mrs. Dugdale, Mts. Cousins, and a number of the relatives of the respective families, were present at the performance of tie ceremony. The bride was given away by her father the Earl sl Hammed. After the ceremony the bride and bridegroom left tom for the seat of the Marquis of Abercorn , the Priory, Se em Sganawf 4 The marriage in long talked of, of Mrs. Cants and the Dabs of St. Albans, took place about three o'clock on Saturday aftemon at Mrs. Coutts's house, the corner of Stratton-street, special licence foe that purpose having been Lamed on Tresday on theistic of the Archbishop of Canterbury. The ceremony we performed in the grand drawing-room, where an altar-table conod with rich crimson Genoa velvet bad previously been placed. ill Grace'l uncle, the Right Hon. and Rev. Lord Francis Bemire. read the marriage service; at which were present the Marquises' Marchioness of Bute, the Ladies &suckle, the Coyotes , oi Gsr% ford, the Karl of Beshorough, the Sari and Countess of Harrostby, the Ladies North, &c. Ste. Aubrey Beauclere, Duke of St. tI. bans, is a descendant of the celebrated Nell Gwynn, by Charles the Second. In virtue of a Royal grant to his antsca from that Monarch, the Dukes of Sc. Albans possess two privilws exclusively exercised by them and by the legitimate de.crntlan's of the Royal Family, via.—that of entering the Court-yard ((SG James's-palace la a carriage, without permission, and that of &iv ing a carriage in what is called the Riog, in Hyde.park. Rev. C. R. Band, Rector of Coombe Raleigh and Sheldon. to Henrietta Mary Bourke, eldest daughter of the Rev. Hoff rellowes, Vicar of &Wary, Devon. At Chem:erten. the Rev. Charles Levington, B.A. of Sc. Jobn's College, Cambridge, to Elisabeth Woolboew, daughter a the tote Rev. R. G. Robinson, B.C.L. Vicar of Harl'e______l_:__-1--------•Srafro,"Ora • DIED. At the Vicarage, Bremblay, Kent, die Rer. A. Kimmins WI /lector of Bermondsey. Sang, aged 85. Aged 57. the Rev. Thomas Tucker, Rector of Kingsdoo, is as ~ ~! x .~ ~elr dui ..,1* .1 • "II . MI moll a us e~. STI new of, PA A* , Dl' We in , Olt 1. 'IP VA ..ti ,3 canny of ionserset. At the Rectory House, Coombay, in his 16th year, t he ilev , At Limerick, the Rev. Henry Edmund Gardiner, M.A. of Trinity College, Dublin, and Rate of Tintem Pares, Monmouthshire. V icar Cberal d that Cathedral, and for nearly 40 years Chaplain of be garnish and Rector of the parishes of KtUmurry and Denys&lvin. The 29th ult. in Union-street. Maidstone, aged 111. Mud the wife of Richard Chancier, en of Mr. Chantke, of tbe Rooe.a. Japerslngram, 'Crown. The husband of the deceased, a young man about '. O . yeah of age, was dangerously ill at the time , and WAS so *ended s d his approaching dissolution, that he begged her bod y might Do: 1 ,, interred until his sown existence had term inated, and that they tuji•'• be terred at the same time and in the same grave. His WOA Ir. ' complied with, and the remains of both wer e interred in Maidstort church-yard, the parents of both the deceased forming part of do sad process MAULS—THIS DAT. ass. IF° ass. 001. 1 0 Dublin 2 o France 1 0 Watertxd 2 0 Hamburg • 1 0 Guernsey and Jersey 1 0 Flanders Lisbon 0 1 Sweden 0 I I Donaghadee 0 0 Malta Buenos Ayres 0 o Leeward Wards 0 e 0 0 ian±t t Holland ----) --",.. ..,, • HIGH 7 vi ATES at LON DON-BUIDG g TO AJOU ' Morning . . 0 minutes suer lo Afternoon . 51 mower , alter l u . v. . t Limnos.: Mot , and' Vis . lined M by Jump ai's', the P ro f . at the Seas Orme, No. 1, ritik.tt-place, T0114014'