Star. — London, England, 1813-12-24 00:00:00

lir - t . . . • • , . . . . . - At, dttrii.ift atiVs kztLEent)trs. While other children ,I Weld. lat*e Spot tive and gay in ;punk* Usk" . ti I weep and sigh when I am told, . " poor Girl, thou art an Orphad Child r No mother's kiss—.-no father's smile Has e'er my infkr.t woes begultd; • They're dead, and I ism left awhile • To weep, a helpless Orphan Child. • Why am I deemed :he porn-use bran, . , • From all a parent's love asitd; • I'd ratites seek an early grave, • , • • Than live—z friendless Ori.han ChM. • • t " Noted my wanderings to reclaim, • Mid scenes of infamy beguild'—* Now May I ;ink, n'ereehelm'd With shame, A lost, abandon'd, Orphan Child ! • Yet stay—forbear my be to break! On me one beam of joy bas I've beard, that Gon will ne'er forsake . • - • , • The poor 'deserted Orphan Child ! Will Ha at whose Almighty voice • Creation rose from chaos itrild, • kVi;it smiles of teutfelteits rejoice The heart Ora poor Orphan Child •• 0 yest he sweetly Whiscirs peace ; • • : Soft are his wOrde,his accents Mild ; • ll€ iiids me liv&-;he calls me Ms.— • • ilappy, happy °reheat Child 1 . . ~ - .S'OCIEIT- OF setwottmAsilits. . , Ott Wednesday the Anniversary of the'Society of Schoolmasters was held at the Crown and Anchor 7 " P lavern, and the Meeting , was tnuch mote numerous ' ly attended than on any former occasion. 'Eite.Thalre of KENi presided, and discharged the duties of the chair with. great ability - and effect. Several eloquent and impressive Speeches, in. commendation (if the Charity anti of its benefactors, 'sere delivered by- His Ro7 *1 Highness, and bythe Bishop of Cattust.e.,Dr. Dt:ttNty, Dr.. LINDSAY, Me.tiavrcarr,%Mr.,Q, Mi.. Kussesc, &c. A very uIN long and resteetaYle List If' new Benefactors was *ld' by Dr._ .I.'ff . after mitich the Royal" Doha' - and-the:Presidents ptii. - tented him with an elegant Silver Vase, Which had' been voted to him by the Sotiety, as a token of their sense of hit able and gratuitous services both atter cretary and Treastuii to the Institution. Marty dial tinguishel literary charaeteri wow present, and . the., day was spent, as usual, with the utmost harmony. losismosa.... .........n. tRfTISII AND PbffElCif BIBLE sochszi : •••••,•0.••••• ' . Whereas a report has been - circulated by many .• persons advorse to the British and Foreign Bible So. . . ciety, that at the late anniversary of the said Society; at Hackney, the Members, in their zeal for the rause, ' handed about and exhibited an effigy of Bonaparte hanging on, a gibbet, . purporting that this would be eventually effected', by the- aforesaid Society t we are authorised hereby to assert, 'that no such absurd and ridiculous proceeding was countenanced by the said Society. A common caricature, of which many ; are in circulation, having inen accidentally and inn°. cently exhibited by a member after dinner r the report took its rise from this unfortunate circumstance. It is a pity, if anniversary meetings be considered ne., cessary to further the objects of charitable institutions, that the members could not dispense with the dinner as a conclusions far people are- often led into ex cesses, after such dinners, of which they would be heartily ashamed on any other occasion. . ~. . Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD was MOM in.on wennes. day, by the LORD CHANCELLOR as Solicitor-Geoetal, in his Lordship's private roam at Lincoln's Inn.— The question of precedence between the Learned Gentleman, as. King's Ancient Serjeant, and the At. torney-Geueral, Las been settled. The latter takes the lead. Friday last, the Cornmlssioners of Hackney-ecaches convicted John Seabright, the. driver of No. 808, in the penalty of 15s. to be paid to the poor of the Pa rish of St. James, Westminster, for cruelly beating one of his horses, on the Friday previous, in Jermyn street; and abusive language to a Gentleman who no ticed his improper conduct. Covent-Garden Market yesterday made its usual evergreen Christmas display. lie//y and Ground-Ivy skirted the market like a forest of undtrwood and the Ilfisletcs bushes, invitingly suspended in allqupters, attracted a spirited competition among the fema ' purchasers I Vegetables of all descriptions were also abundant, and sold at moderate prices. BOXING.—A pitched battle, for forty guineas, took place on Lea Common or Marshes,'near Cobham, on Tuesday, between d. Crosiley, a gardener, and T: Bisgr, a coachman. They set-to in an eighteen-feet roped ring, with professional seconds, and the combat lasted two hours. During the first quarter of au hour besh suffered much, and the advantages were tolerably equal ; but Biggs was the best hitter, though his adversary parried many well-intended hits. At the end of half an hour both were much reduced,' but they alternately recovered second wind, and from off-fighting re-commenced some tremendous rallies; • and Biggs was ultimately declared the victor, his ad versary having been beat out of time. A Dutclosan, of the Larne of Hug:off, of 14 , stone, • underteok, on Wednesday, to go two miles in eleven. minutes, on the Cranford-bridge-road. He did the I mile in five *antes and eight seconds, fresh and tvEll s -but he wis three minutes going the next half and relished the task. The match was for .five guineas. - It may got, perhaps,:beuninteresting to our Rea , ders to be informed; that ORANVE BOVEN 1 the watch . vord of Puteh'independence, is pronounced by the Hollander I, Ordayee . Pooitin. Early in Decembirr, the well-known horse Stag*, the property of Mr. CIIADBURN, of Blythe, Notting, haaishire, was found dead in the stable by the groom, He is supposed_ to hive been poisoned, but by what !beaus is . not ascertained. Yesterday nrorning, the body of an elderly man, genteelly attired, was discoieted, floating in the 'gluten's Bas,n, Hyde Parks and conveyed to the workhouse of St. Getn,gi.., Hanovta%Npassis ~ ... . VAIYSIO THIRD A Lady entitled t- Lovidi Ditch _ siti which), t ei ;discharge, ling the. piee from tle parcnase money. . Mr, Lost. ingtcin never paid the Dutc h' mortgage, and a suit wai:tionitriented against hit ta to account. He some 'time-alter .became bait:duOpt, and his assignees were made parties. It came out at length that Mr. Lush ington bad mortgaged the estates to the house of, Boldero and Co. bankers. That house likewise failed, and their assignees were made parties. An en quiry waS Ordered by the Chancellor, into the circum. ' stances of rise case, which had now been going on for nearly three,years, and the report was ready to be nude. The assignees of Boldero and Co. in ate mean time, filed a bill in the Court of - Chancery in. Grenada, against Mrs. Young and her son, and against a Mr. Duncan Campbell; who was stated to have purchqed the-. Dutch indrtgagiriii about 5e13,000, praying that they plight. be at liberty to redeem the : nyirtgage, at 'the Sum paid for it by Campbell, and for.iforeclosure. "Sir ARTHUR PIGOTT DOW applied fd 'ln Atinction to restrain the further proceedings' its the Grenada suit, and-to have the bill these dismissed, as it related to the same matters tit - ought before the Court here, where the parties might have complete - justice.; and . this was the more desirable l fs,the.parties'all resided; • here, though thiestatet wen hi Orehide. Mr. objected to- this, in *dirt of form, the motion embraced all the relief prayed for by the upplemental on.whieh it was founded ; and he opposed it Also on the merits, stating, that the suit in Grenada cemprehended some - things' ntit brought be 4 the 'Conti itee. • Tlie.Losm-Cuasicsta.ox said, that' it was not uni versally true, that a motion could not he entertained becauseitrnbraced the whole of the relief prayed by the `'bill;' and, on the Wheile, if the suit in Grenada ted : tothe saint •Matteri that were 'before the ' • litere:(*s to which paiticular- he requested sonie further iaformatioa) he thought the proceedings hi' the Grenada suit ought to be restrained. -DEC. EQ. V. EVE. • The Loan CuasrceLlasit again mentioned this case to-day, atilt asked Mr. Agar if he had any other cases. Its - refer to, no she subject of a fenant continuing to holdover after the lease-had been put an end to, ex c_e jt.theeaseto which he haialready referred in lst H. Blackstone's lteports ? Mr. Aaaa said he had,other two cases to which to ref&his Lordship. Indeed he Might hive had many mote cases to cite, sviieredie doctrine for which he had to contend had been recognise3, but he and his Learned Friend* MO were with him 'had been pre vented from arguing the point as theyjhould other- Wise have done, it-having been admitted to them, on the other side, that the principle for which they con tended wai the established law. He now referred his Lordship to the case of Doe on the demise of Collins v. Wailer, in 7th Durnfordand East, p. 479, which only went the length of holding that the notice to quit as at the term of theespiry of the ; lease was g00d..1 and which case again, referred to a. case in Nisi Nos to be found iu Ist Term Reports, 164. Wright v. Derby, in which, mention is made Of anq ther case of Murgatroyd o. The LO R D-CHANCELLOR said he should look into those cases, and give his judgment to-morrow, though, at present he was not inclined to admit the doctrine "to the full eitent to which the reasoning which he bra found would carry it, and that for reasons which he should mention. Mr. AGAR said-it was not necessary, for the plaintiff ,in this ease to ask of his Lordship -to carry the doc trine to the full extent to which the principle had, ,been carried in the casesleferred to. The Vice Chan; cellos had admitted the principle of law, for which the , plaintiff conteuded, to be one which -was recog nised in every day's practice, and yet had decided against that principle. The Loeb Citoscetzon again said he should Live his judgment . to-morrow. OPERA HOUSEO-..-WATERS t 7. ,TAYLOR. Mr. Hater said he had now taken the liberty, pur suant to his Lordship's orders, to prepare minutes of his Lordship's decree in this case, not, however, sug, gesting any thing as to the appointment of an interim Hanarer, understanding that his Lordship would . himself give some distinct directions on that head. The LORD CHANCELLOR asked, had the minutes been shewn to the other party . Mr. HART said be had shewn them to Mr. Skid. well, who had no - objections to them, except that he wislicdAliat the Master would make a separate report. as to' the niortgage debt. This Mr. Hart and his Learned Friends who were with him, thought unne cessary, as it was by those minutes proposed that the Master should have liberty to make separate Re (ports, and frdm time to time as to any or all of the -matters referred to him. The minutes should he handed to his Lordship. LORD ciiaxcet,ton--.“ Let have them now, and I will tell you ,what I think when I come into the, Conn to-morrow." • LANGRIDCE v. KELL. Mr. LEACH moved, that a Receiver should be ap-1 pointed in this case, to uplift the debts due to. the. plaintiff and defendant, who had for sixteen years catried on business as co-partners in the profession of , Attornies at Lewes. The plaintiff, in consequence of some misunderstaning between the parties, gave notice to the defendant of a dissolution of the part-. nership between them, to take place as on the 24111 of June last; and with a view to this dissolution, the papers relative to their business had been divided be. tween them. The plaintiff had offered to the defen dant to - refer to any respectable person the adjustment of the accounts between them, but this the defendant refused to agree to; and, in the mean time, the plain tiff being satisfied hat the defendant was considerably indebted to him, with the View of preventing him from adding to and increasing that debt, by dfawing out of the hands of their bankers the joint fends, on his separate account, had given nnt:ce to the bankers not to pay any money out of that joint account, unless upon drafts or 'orders having the signatures of both . . ....se to - - ,- Lordship. . Mr. EIMMIDS followed nit 4 .*l6l.side. * . Sir •Si!thillitl. RO,IIII.I.YANI DAr kloser resisted the ~ 1 applicatiqn. An unfortpiaateilisjittte,hevieg AO between that two dentteifien,.wito Were both In y respectable, and who had intrit;beentoniseited'a i. - ; i iin siness.together ; the plaintiff had given to . the - defen.' dolt notice of a dissolution of partnership, whirkthe defeeclant denied he had a-right to d . o. That,weh j i sitiestipit still to* be settled ; but. , befpre it tottld.ht 64 Settled, the Caine into that Court, and Oiled , opon his Lordship tceappoint a receiver of the funds l .10-oris effects belonging to ahejoiitt conies:Tv in Which_ thepresent plaintiff and, ctefendapt were equall y iri l , terested. T his was an.tpplication which the Learned, Counsel were satisfied his. Lordship Mould refe.se, um: less, indeed, the law Of the Court Was. that Wherever,' in any case, a partnership was at an end, IV feceiver must be appointed. -There was not, they eubmitted,i the least pretence for this /notion, as, there wes not . efen'in allegation or misconduct, but what the de fendant had done was matter of absolute necessity, isrid-vilhichhe was compelled to. dcebY the act of the .plaintiff , hiroself, who had rendeiedit impossible that he OlGe4 ll 4 o otinue to pay the joint money into an ac seam, out of which he could not again draw it, for th i e inwpOiei cf the joint concern. Having, however, prevailed on the bankers to pay him, at the end of .Me quarter, money suCcient to answer the office - re-' ditirre, and alsb 8100. for his own private use, •ht; . • had the delicacy to transfer a similar sum to the . _ private account of the plaintiff. The account, too, ithich he had opened, and into which he bad paid the ottnt • l'eollected by him belonging to the joint fund, was not an account from which he drew any sums for his own private use, but solely on the joint account. Mr. Leacit having replied, The Loan CHANCEL..I.OR said, if he were certain as to the facts of the cpe,.. the principles by which the Cchtrt would be •go - Vetned, in disposing of such an' application, were' clear and undisputed. The fact of, the ,dissolntion of a partnership. was, of -itself, no ground for a receiver. All that_thodiseolution meant was, that no new botiness shoehl be entered into, but, with that exception, tlaa parties were to act together, - and to be governed, in re rd to their conduct toJ 'wards each other, by the-e*E:prineiples as hitherto, tiU such time as their affairs'. wen/completely wound ,„up. No cenicact between _Ow pasties themselves! (,particularly wheretbey were: of the profession to 'which these parties - belonged) 'could put an end to the business. in Which- they *ere engaged, but such business must go on • to a final ' conciiiiion ; and, though it was common, and might be convenient, as jletween the parties themselves, when a eartnership such as the present was dissolved, 'that the papers - should be divided between the two partners, and that 'they should each go on in haute, each managing the business connected with the parts which he had separately kept to himself; still, as. to their clients, they could not do sa—they had rstao.4 the services of both, and if they insisted an having them, were enti- i tled to i.rail themselves of those joint services, till their business. was concluded. He did not say that there might be such peevishness on both sides, as, if made out satisfactorily, might call on the Court to interfere in such a case; but the Court was not, with out satisfactory prOof, to suppose that parties were of '"such tempers that they could not meet together with out coming ro extremities. If there, had been an 'agreement between co-partners, that one should draw money out of the jointaccount, in the joint name, for I thepurposes of the joint concern, that understandiug , :"or agreement could not, by notice trtim one of the :parties, be altered ; nor was the Court, withoin dis tieet proof of the necessity of such a measure, on the, application of one partner, to subject the other to the expellee and hardship of having a receiver imposed on the joint effects. If, on the other band, it was shewn that one partner . had improperly interfered, and had employed the partnership funds to any other purposes—if, for instance, being aware of the impro priety of which he was guilty, it could be ;hewn that he had emplOyed those funds in catrying•on any new business, on .iiis own account, er so as to procure ta: your for himself—in such a c.iie as that the Court would interfere, Those plieciples he should apply to the present case, And shoull accordiegly, after reading, the affidavits on both sides, refuse, or grant, the present application. _ COURt' OF COMMON PLEAS, DECEMBER 23. SANDILANDS li. TUE LION. eAsr-ixut a COMPANY.° 1 This was an action directed by the'Court of Clian-, eery, to try a number of issues respecting the freight, demurrage, and other c xp.:•iisn in.zurred by the Corn pany's ship Walpole, in a voy'ge from Bengal_ to Margate, near which place she was lost, some years ago. . s It appeared from the evidence, that die ship made tier voyage to Bengal in safety. On her I.iomcward bound-voy-ige the Purser lent her alravell at Ports mouth. In censequ=ce of ad: ices from Capt. Sandi lands, the Commander tithe Walpole, he (tl.e Pur ser)ovent down to Margate ; and about a mile below that place, he found tile ship bad been cast ashore in a heavy gale. The Second Mate of the ship proved that Captain Bolderson, the Master-Intendant of the Company at Margate, took the command of the ship ; that, by 'his orders, the cargo was.got on shore and sent to Lentign, in craft provided by the Com pany. When the vessel was lightened, it was.attemp ted to get her afloat by additional pumps which were put into her; that, however, was found impractica ble, and she was then scuttled under the rnizen.chains, on the laiboard side, by Capt. Bolderson's orders. It was, however, the opinion of some of the witnesses, that she might have been got off, and so far repaired as to have taken in her cargo again, and carried it to ' London. Besldes the freight and demurrage; there • were the expenses of the ship's.company on shore, as t•daring the gale they could n ot liv e o n b oar d t h e s hip, I tr anal° the expense of carryin g the iro n k en tl e d ge up , to London, which had been defrayed by the owners. lO= this evidence, it was argued, „that although.' test darter-party steed that the ship sh9uld deli& lai r oat the prier of LotidtChltillure of which 4he world feifeit all adrantigics drilling from freight, i'demntrage, .6e. yet as the argerAtad teen sent to 6ickadon in gift belonging to the Company, and F T the COmpany's.orders, there was a new cot eqpant ea. tireljt j besides; that it had been plnved diet - the ship ithaid hire hien weighed op, have litkin kiln Vargo loin, and hase'proosede4 with it tit tdid6n, her only fort 0 dtachutge s uccordiug to the terms;of the charter-party.. The Comprity ought therefore to he liable for the freight and demurrage trojn Bengal, as well as for the 6theirexpintell, as,, hitt for the orders of their oficert the ship would have been able to hive completed her voyage. On the part of thedefendants, it Was maintained, t ee ra e c v ts id t er f tcl e on ca ts head had ie hi itw,stt n u o be e n itthat boric out a jo Bolderson had ordered the cargo to be carried txi •ndon by craft employed brthe Company. 'But as to the order fbr scuttling the ship, he could home no authority to . giye it. as shur t ntnpany had no ,for ther interest in the ship the% eatelated to the cargo. ' But;allowing. Mai he , did pre' the order to scuttle her, if ivatai so 'easy. to get her off. tcr reship't* cargo on board of her, and to being her nnlit 44ii to London, her only port of diseharr, why , did; tat Captain SA.ncii/a.u&st.on thipayt.. o inynselt and 14 Ownersobject to itit Order?..-Why did not he a t his ofEcert, with t 1 ditistante of the s'ip's coil. puny, getilie vessel off and bring her to . London ?-z- That this was impassible was shown by the event, it p sho was scuttled, anti sold to,ayeraon who:broke her up. The charter-patty too was expre% for by it, if the vessel bad foundered immediately ttityr her break.- ing . ground front Griveseid,. on her outward-bound; Voyage, the owners would have received the seamen's. ,wages and war-freight, amounting to twelve or thir-t teen thousand pounds. By the charter.party too, it was equally expressed that the ship should 'deliver H Caigo'at the port'of London; failing this, she erould7torfeit all advantages from homeward-butiod freight, demurrage, &c. After a t very. long trial; the Jury returned their Ta r . act . on the several is s urs—finding for the plaintitf on thteaftensts of the vessel from India to Marg...te, to Wilms, subject to deduction for extra ex es : sOf the Courpany—for the' expensei .of the tledge and demurrage—and -for the seamen's ren ea wages and outward-bound war•fl eight, fur the-plain tiff-also ; but for the homeward-butmd height, SIC. for the defendants. S4ttrday evening last, as the Rev. EVAN JOlntl e Who resides near Portman-gate, on the Harrow-road, was returning home, -soon niter seven o'clock; in a .angle-borsocbaive; he was stopped between the se. cond and third mile-scene online road, by a footpad, who seized the horse's reins, presented .a pistal at Mr. JO Nits; and, with horrid threats, demanded bit money and robhed him of his pocket-book, containics several Bank of England notes, and a bill of exchatigp for £5O, with which he made his =Ape. Saturday evening, between seen and-eight o'clock at Mr. 8i5.44 . wlto resides at a brill near Edfnoti• ton, was travelling in a single horse chaise betwous that place and Southgate, he was stopped by tno footpads, one of whom seized his horse, and the other presented a pistol, and with violent threats ikmaniked h:s money. He debvcted to them the contents of Ibts pockets, emoutfsing to.abian al? in bask note=, Ard in silver to near .4S, The roVe..s appeared to te bistouring men, asitfrorn their talk are supposed w Ire Irishmen, :•'• • • Saturday last a Coronet's Inquest was held In Broad-street, Oarnaby Mar Ket t upon the body of Alt% Hugh Lewis, who was found deatUty l» s.bedsi apparently having fallen in a fit, while dressing hi it self, to to the 'lwo-penny Post Office, Gerrand street, were, and at Coventry-street, in the time of the P.nny Post, he had attended to take in lent; for nearly SO fears - The verdict was—" Died ly the Visitation of Gori. " Tuesday night, soon after A. At.nora, Esq, of Down-street, Piccadilly, had retired to bed, be was seized with a fit of conghing, and broke a blood ves sel, A professional Gtutleinan was instantly sent for, but before he • Could arrive, the spark of life was extinct. -Tuesday, as a sailor and his wife were returning Along the Strand, from the Navy Pay Oflite, Somer set House, where he had. been to receive his pay, he dropped down, near 4urrepatrect, aid iuotainly u. pireci, - It is iu the 'months of Decembei avid Jaemary that Surgeon flsnett . particularly recommends the use et the Pieparte.l Srttamowitim and OxYMEL in Ws valua ble Treatise on thE CaUsel, Cure, rte. of Asthma. Cqnsumpti , in, and Winter Cough. . Tho 4! invalids Lugo are subject to attacks of the chest dui ng winter and spring, tJ:is experienced Author observes, will remain r erfectly- free from any symptoms, if they hart srcourse to do use of the Prepared-Strams niuna aod Qzymel at Cie commencement of the wia?er sewn.. In order th it the public m iy be regularly with these itemed4cs, BUTLER, No. 4, Chelr , side, corner of Si. Paul's, is app anted the W/;olebi;e and Retail Vender; whose name on the stamp 'Au enable the pull*. to, distinguish the trbe from the spurious kind. They zesty also be obtained of Mr. atants, corner of Ludgate-hill ; Mr. I) scoN, 15 ), Oxford-street ; and most Medicine Venders in the cowry, price 4s. Lid. and Ss. e id.. MARRIED.. At Greenock, on the 1 4th inst. the Rev. John Barr, ' of the Rel.ef Church, Dorval I, Glasgow r to El;sa, eitl.;st ter of Air. Rubcrt Houton, Greenock The 9th instant, the Rev. John Bower, minister. of Mar F . to S.r.tit Chnatin.a, only daughter of the late Rel.. & " ander Wilson, minister of Carnpvere & DIED. On the loth inst. at 'Trafford House, Lieutenant lArneei Trafford, of tile lst, 'or Royal Dragoons, after a tedious • , 11 1 . ft. vere Hints', brought on by fatigues undergone in the Reain-ols. In him his family have to lament a relrive of the most amnh.e disposition, and his frieuds to regret the loss of a roost pngu young Officer. At his brother's, Dartmoutb-street Wromfoster, Captda George J. Pepper, of the Hon. East I ndia Company's Srrvizer aged 31 years. Friday, at Great &Rag, M;ddleses. Fogad, John Ste:' ,y dint son of Rear-Admirsl Stephens, avid 16 years andO HIGH WATER A 3 LONDON BRIDGE TO•MORRJW. Mop Ng Aft.ll/3 " • ...... • •-•••• m n 1111*A4 after 3 LONDON t • Printed by 1.1t1P31. lCtltr,Pletet race 40l lllWisbal then, *ad at tis-EtarOdice, Temps itv. . . . . , • •.•' • . , • • ' A dir 1247 . 24 L 1004 7 CL ' - the plaintitand defendant. • ..,i, .. *_.:. . ,"; - ' 7 &, 6 :L ic i 4 , .*. ), . • . • °Ft!" li- I)l9tEhtlieltitt. ' applied *it et 'it § an. -• • '.. ' 11 :. - It . . WO ,AI N OTHIIiti :1) . . - is - r 4 /14RDYATT. AND AN a $ of money belon td '-i O , -i O ,. •,,i- l in k . --- . 11 ran, ..e . e tAlkOf psi itainti as 111010DiDO AND CO. had collected since the O, of the pattnehbilk I, I,ady of itie ! narof -OCYO;:tg. and her app. were to his own.private purposiemart . conlxiw4ttt be had tied to'. eo'atile estites in Gileriada,'lnd ton', opened a lOW - account in Vs own nvEemilqi.xrbicis :ted to*lttlteui toldr. .f..ushingtcm, a merchant in lie had * padiftOnlEA belongl4iO th e jonit cottairn:.m6 Scion, 'for £52,000. The estates were subject to a In these circurristintes, 'the i preient aptilication for A tell mortgage- for £28;000, and to other debts, Receiver aott for a0.11011,r / ticio against theAyfewcant. ch - :NfiaMnsktitesia agreed to discharge, deduc- restraining him froth iuterftii_ pg . frith, ths joint funds, the price from tie purchase money. .lAr i Lush. ti ll an account should . he•-fia — tir!liii . toide tolis