Star. — London, England, 1820-10-28 00:00:00

. „ :~ . ty Herding to the opiniosi of Mr. Denman. If Ms Learned Friends could point out conwadiegions in the testimony of Majocchl, be could tdkdo4g in the tutimarf of Carrington ; nay, such con tridictions nor such evaslotts, as would spew that his evidence could not be relied on. What did Carrigton prove with respect to RucaneUi, at which the supposed conversation with Idajocchl k•said to have taken place relative to BaronOmpteda? Rucanelli ! The circumstance be was going to mention was trifling in itself, but was one, on the present occasion, which required to be at tended to. Carrington said Rucastell; was only four miles from Rome ; that the travelling there only occupied about three quar ters of an hour, and that it was nearer Rome than FrascatL— Was chat true? What did Carlo Forte say on that subject?— 'hat it *as twelve miles from Rome, and that Frascati was nearer it than Rucanelli. It would further appear he contra dicted himself in page 591, as compared with his examinatke in page 693. In page 991 he was asked— " Were you in any other ship in his Majesty's service than the Poictiers?—No. " Had you any certificate from Sir John Beresford of your service under his command ?-1 had it, but I have not it now. " Were you rated a Midshipman on board the Poictiers ? I was. " What situation had you served in before you were on board the Poictiers as Midshipman ?—I had been at sea in the Mer chant service when I was a boy ; then I had been on land and got my livelihood in the best way I could. You are to be understood that you were never in his Ma jesty's service before ?—No. " Did you join that ship as a Midshipman, capable of doing your immediate duty, or as a youngster wan with Sir John Beresford on board the Poictiers. " Do you mean that you entered as a youngster to learn your duty, or did you go upon the quarter-deck as an effective Mid shipman ?—I was not a very youngster; I did not go on the quarter-deck for some time, but I understood I was to .be Midshipman. " Yon are perfectly clear in your own mind that you left his Majesty's service for no other reason than at your own request? —iething else." [While the Counsel was reading this, some impatience was exhibited, amid cries of Hear, hear! go ea site.] Now one thing was clear, Carrington must have known if he served in one vessel or is many ; and the questions put to him were so pointed to the fact, that his not answering them evidently sheered he must have had some modve for concealing the truth. When asked, in page 695, If he understood he was to be a mid shipman, or whether he had been in any other ship, he said be understood the question solely to apply to his service with Sir John Beresford. Would their Lordships, however, think that explanation at all satisfactory ? Beside, be depose d to coover sadons held with Sir John Beresford, which were denied by that honourable Officer, and that upon a fact which no man ant* mistake. Here he might remark how very unusual It was to call a witness to support the testimony of one who had trifled in his cross-ex.intination. Earl GREY—Counsel withdraw.- 0 My Lords, I beg, in justice to myself and to your proceedings, to offer a necessary explanation, in consequence of what has fallen from the Com l.& I did not call for the production of any witness foe the purpose of supporting the inconsistency of another witness. It is in your Lordships' recollection, that a Noble Lord on the op posite side (Melville) had. in consequence of official informa tion, desired that Carrington should be called up again. In the course of the evidence Carrington stated certain things and ap pealed to the knowledge of Sir John Beresford. In order to elucidate the truth, I certainly moved, that Sir John Beresford should be requested to attend this House. I called fur that at tendance with the impression that his examination would either support or contradict the evidence of Carrington. I could not have any other object ; and if your Lordslsips did not think that Lion justifiable. you would, no doubt, have checked me. proposition justifiable, you would, no doubt, have checked me. The Counsel for the Bill permitted himself to say, that I did so with the view of producing one witness to uphold the inconsis tencies of another. I could not hear such an aspersion thrown ottt, imputing to me a motive which I feel to be an aspersion,, *without, on the instant, sluing to disclaim it, and to assert deo it is quite unfounded"—(Hear, hear, hear). Counsel were then called in. The Arrosinte-Gauguac continued.—He was stating, that Sir J. Deresford had been, undoubtedly, called to elucidate the truth, but that, under such circumstances, it was not usual for one witness to be called to confirm another. Though be was not entitled to know *hat had just passed, he must my, in jus gee to himself, that he meant to cast no imputation upon the Noble Lord. For one, he sincerely rejoiced that the course bad been pursued, because it had elicited the truth, aud shewed that Carrington had stated what was mann. He would now call the recollection of the I louse to what Sir .Totin &resford, had sworn, on pages 841, 842, and 845. The following were some of the earliest questions put to him : - " Do you remember a person named William Carrington serving on board the Poictiers?—Yes, as a Quarter-Master. Was he never otherwise employed than as a Quarter-Mas ter I—Never, while I commanded. " Did you, when you left the ship, leave any directions for rating him a midshipman ?—There was an acting Captain on board, Captain Jones. At the request of Sir William Gell, who wished to procure his discharge, I directed the Captain to rate WillLun Carrington as my clerk; but he was discharged, rated midshipman. " You know then, that he was rated midshipman ?—I never knew it of myself; but 1 find that he was, in order to get his discharge. 64 In point of fact, then, he was a midshipman ?—He was. " Was it at Sir William Gell's request, and not in conse quence of any request on his part 7—At Sir William Gell's re peated request to me. " Did you give him, at the time of his leaving, a ship certi ficate of good conduct?—l gave him a certificate of good ems duct either before he left the ship or after, I do not know which, but I gave him a certificate. " You gave him a certificate expressing your approbation of his conduct ?-Yes ; he was a very good man while I commanded the ship, and I gave him a certificate, as 1 do all good seamen. " Are their Lordships to understand from you, that William Carrington, in point of fact, never was a mids hipman of the Poictiers while you commanded that ship 2—Never. " He never did the duty as a midshipman?—Never. " Do you recollect any conversation with Carrington, as to his being rated as a midshipman, or brought forward in e ser vice as an officer?—Never. " Do you recollect his complaining to you, that he did unlike the sea, and that he wished to get his discharge on that account? I will state the proceeding before he said he did not like the sea. " Did he ever state to you that he wished to be discharged from his Alajeity's service, because he did not like the sea ? yes ; Sir William Gal asked me to do him the favour of mac- Honing this man's discharge ; I called Carrington ' and said— ' Carrington, what, do you wish to leave the servioe? I hope to Don you will not leave the servke :* he said he was very anxious to leave the service, he was pressed into it, and did not bike the. are. ',think those were his words, as nearly as I can be upon my wit; 1-waaaarprised when this discharge was asked for. Was chub( any engagement that Carrington should be rated as a midshipsnans- or any understanding on that subject, at the this heater on based your ship 7--No; he was drafted, I be lieve, Oilman( the Pak*. Aim another ship ; I had never seen Mat till then. “ Was there any antregement dosing the time of his service at a quartermaster, that he should be made *midshipman what • be was serving in your -ship 7—Not by me, there was no en gagenvost. Did WilliapCarvington have the service in the year int ? --Yes, he " lhd bg, or had he sot, been a midshipman foe twelve months beApre he left the service?--No; be bad never been a midshipman before be left the service, to my knowledge. " Did he ever decline the appointment uf midshipman?--I never 'offered it to him. Qo you know whether be did or did not receive 'Tidal*. mans pay for a twelvemonth?—The ship's books can best tel that ; but I should say no; • the skip's books are alwaye rep. larly kept, and ean be referred to. " You are certain that you never gave Carrington any mum to expect proinotion as a Midshipman during the time he served as a Quarter7Master 7...N0t while I was in the ship. e Did Carrington ever state to you any dil6ealty, in point of s• pense, of dressing himself, and maintaining himself as a blid phiprnad 7—N6; if he had, I should have maintained him, as I did otbsrp in the service, till he could pay me again. •• '• you ever tell Clrrington that be was to be on the quar ter-deck; .0 do you recoiled Carrington replyitig, that he did noi wish' to he op gig tratter-dreek, for he had's° friends a money to smart iii at the qv:timer-deck 7-elletteve toid ma any such thing and after I knew he was wbe air Was. Gees servant, It was wary =ma 1 &m ad prelpola to him in 'be Officer in the ameba " This never passed before you knew be war to be Sr WM. Gull's servant ?—Never." --Carrington had here evidently coetraffietel kinteelf ; and also as to his baits Midelpaim, when, in point at fact, he was not so. Was he, then, to contradict Majocchl, and to what? A , supposed conversation with Majoechi at Itecanefil, which took place in the earveote-liall, in the presence of other servants, as well as Pharisee Serb, who was now in this country. Why was Soria not called in confirmation of Carrington ? Carrington required support ; he could not be relied en ; and, if a balance were to be struck between his evidence and that at Majoahrs it would be In favour at Malachi. whom evidence was, In many places, borne out. The LORD CHANCELLOR asked whether the Attorney- General bad finished this point. as it was now four o'clock 2 The Anos...fte-Gaisaan answered in the affirmative, and the House then adjourned. THE EVENING STAR.. LONDON. SATURD4Y, OCTOBER 28. 1820. at. Sawa awl Ss. Juaz.--Holiday at the Hsi& THE QUEEN. Never was mortal placed in a more awkward pre dicament than was the ArTORNRY-GENZIAL yester day. His cause completely demolished—his clay and iron reduced to dust, and dissipated like chaff before the tempest, he was still obliged to labour under the mandates of his- cruel task-masters, and, for a day or two more, compelled to make his usual tale of bricks—and that too without a single straw to help to bind the materials together ! Will any one venture to charge him with being idle er remiss ? No, no: he did all that man could do to make the worse appear the better argument ; nor iught his employers to blame him, but themselves, that his Reply has tended to establish rather than 'overturn the evidence in favour of the Quint. In stead of replying to the case for the Defence, in which his opponents had destroyed the credibility of De Most, Majoceki, and Sacchi, &c. he occupied himself in recapitulating the evidence for the prole. cution, as if he had again been suismingup, taking for granted the truth of their statements, as if their characters still remained unimpeachable, and every part of their • evidence uncontradicted. No wonder, that, placed in such a pitiable condition, be should frequently fall into the bathos, and, on several occa :ions, exhibit specimens of false logic. It is amusing to see with what simplicity the Learned ArroamavGtemaAL assumes that all Dc Mont story about the Opera night at Naples remains un impeached, although Sir WILLIAM MILL and Mr. Kern'. CRAVIM have both sworn that the chief in cident in that statement, the early return of the PRINCESS from the Opera House, a 1 if to mark the anxious solicitude with which she courted her shame, was false, and that the Patacess, in fact, had that F light remained remarkably late at the Theatre, and was extremely fatigued when she returned to her house. The Learned Gentleman also assumes that the dress worn by the Princess at the masquerade, when she appeared as the Muse of History, was indecent, and even affirms that Sir W. Gat.t.'s testimony supports this assumption. The reasoning of the ATTORNAY• GENII/IAL on this point is very singular, if not inge nious. Sir W. Gni., it is true, declared that the dress was high in the neck, and covered the arms of the Princess ; but, says the ATTORNIIIIC-GINSIRAL, the dress was transparent—was it so ? Then how do we know that it was transparent ? Oh ! -says the ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Sir W. GELS. proves it was transparent—"for he saw another dress under IV Is it not amazing that a man of the acquirements of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL, when seeking to prove, if possible, the nudity of the Princess of WALD, should try to establish his allegation by such a display of stupidity as this! As to comparisons of character made on this occa sion, we beg to call the attention of nor Readers to the high compliment he paid to the British Navy, in stating that Majouhi--Majocehi, of non ,ni ricordo notoriety—was a mom respectable witness than WIL LIAM CA RIUNGTON, a Ma beloved by his Officers, and of whose character Sir JOAN BLIMS/01U) spoke in such high terms. But the most curious incident during any part of . the proceedings of yesterday, was the unexpected &closure respecting the notorious Baron Onsptetla. Every one knows the pains which have been taken, from first to last, throughout these proceedings, to ' withdraw this Hanoverian from all inquiry. The moment a witness pronounced the name of Onsptodo, the whole host of Counsel for the prosecution were in array to silence him. The triumph was judged com plete. The fighthad been fought out, and the labours of Ontpteda were still in the shade. The Arroaszy-Ga rria.u, thought he might now safely say of Ompteda what he pleased, and accordingly be began to boast. that not the slightest evidence had been produced of the machinations of the Boron against her MAJESTY. Un fortunately for the ATTORNEY-GENERAL, he had ' scarcely uttered these words, when up started Mr. BaouonAm. and communicated to the House, that h l h m a p d r6 ju g a i received f a ref nu m mbir k a i letters, itho w n ri ti tten lik as e and h si e ici r :ed s :y m ß u a c ron h for Om th ptede e Latoddressedassador from m som th e e of pro. the suite toel opfzierherwh:ytainldHofigrohnesse: an d the is i l l i : Marietta De Moat, in which he had endeavoured to corrupt and suborn them to give evidence against Pro testant King of HANOVER to the Porn I Everything that has occurred since the return of her MAJESTIC serves to prove that the King of Ents-, of tic H al laa t° i heats role? We know Dot their gam* condition ! ' but it is known that among them ace a numerous • and heartily Nobility, ready to-nude:take the AO won Inca tie ilabiect dSettiof PUIP° 2I . I and here 1 out of any; or any ncherentY emPinYmmts glite adlie c i t 7 - c - Ist ant lardshiPe - tk* "talks "' aretnrn MID inspatek, the eyes of Englishmen. Have we in England any went to her m l e ' Re ehe yal e " en Highaess a 7 lua reeen ; and that, upon his Omptedee and Reding*, leagued with Grimm , ' and trance . h er R o m /a s h en , ordered her to retire, and Beryz a r t4 BersteUs to ruin an innocent woman ? Let us—if remained in the bebeocen. Now, what did Mr. Brougham so possible —hope not. But must it not be provoking "That he should satisfactorily skew, that within so hour and a to the high spirits of English Statesmen to fins as half after the return of Berland with the Pannone. her R0.,4 agency exercised throughout Europe, interfering Highness was on her journey to Venice; and that the peri4 between his ordeal and .the departure of the suite, had tr i with the domestic concerns of this country, by the occupied in mains the neceses " preparations for the jourr„,.. Now, what had Hownam , and Vassal' said to substantiate t}:: iinisters of a German State (Hanover) over a hom they have no controul. What a state of things! statement? I must also maim, that Mr. Williams said l•t Hanoverian Ambassadors suborning witnesses against had three Witnrift. to Produces with the view of proving tii, fact, and that no more than two were produced--the Count( the QUZIN of ENGLAND ! of OW, no doubt, the other person, having been kept baa, The only other incident of yesterday, worthy as toe reasons best known to tbe Learned Counsel for the Queer, particular notice, was the visit of his Royal High- and easily guessed at by everybody else. Bet what were tit Den Prince LtodbOLD to her MaJzfiry. We confess preparations, according to the account of Hownam and Vasa.i? Why, Fasten admitted that the baggage had not been unpadoc, that we have always been among the number of those who thought that hjs Royal Highness ought, pprepand ank. tl " l " 6 " for the j e meld lm an ha c r a heen the _n° sweat repara : for ; Ina" w : in duty, to have paid his respects to his mother-in- made ha d bersiundert Z en merely for the purpose of re.. law as soon as she arrived this country ; but we mov i ng the mew . He also spas being asked whethr are not so confident of the correctness of our own her Majesty was dressed ? that she was covered with slush, views of propriety, duty, decency, and respect, as to bet not a word as to her being dressed. Now, De Mont la)si affirm that the conduct of others should be measured that part of her Bold highness's dress was taken off, by our standard. It is admitted on all hands that the hem, of course, there was no contradiction to that witness; Prince has :hewn great prudence in abstaining from nalentent• Bets I lab your Lordships. b upon union with either of ' the conflicting parties of the State; to contradict trifles of this kind, that a defence against so acrd. and it is easy to conceive that be might believe that ow a charge is to be grounded ? Is this the way to prole tht while the charges against the Quilts remained units- a servant was not with his mistress in her bed-chamber alone vestigated, he would be found exhibiting something for hours? Now, as to the time of delay—Wes it actually as like opposition to his father-in-low, had he paid his boar and a half, according to the assertion a Mr. Hroughau.? respects to the mother of his own wife. The cause, Why, Hownam sad Vessel had both admitted that the suite however, being now virtually terminated, no reason did not set out till broad daright. Does not this correspord could remain why his Royal Highness should not with the evidence of De Moot? Look, toe, to the answer ad now express to the Quaint that conviction which he Vaasa& when questioned upon the subject of what be bad ob feels in common with every honest man ij the ling- served :be had travelled day and night, and yet be did not fed dom. 'lt was by an appointment of the day before fatleued, or think k necessary to retire to bed,.akhough be was that the Prince waited yesterday upon her MAJESTY. not required to ands in making those nightly preparadons..-- The interview continued for about an hour, and He stays up, and employs himself in walling tip and down from was perfectly satisfactory to both patties : nor need the stairs to her Royal Highness's bed-rooms ; and upon being we add, that the Nation cannot but participate in oohed what be had bees doing, be replied, that a persca was the proof thus given of the effect of the evidence pro- in eternal movement when wade/ upon people of Noe duced on the trial in removing every ground of sus- if this be a triumphaet emstradktion; the defence •has, tkboes; picion against the character of her MAJasTi. of a triumph suck as bad never before bees obtained. Whatever TWENTY-THIRD DAY OF THE DEFENCE. the Counsel a g ainst tlas Bin may think of It,l lwarrenare the lei' HOUSE OF LORDS. deuce of Vassal! and Hinman to be a conlirmatia sf De-Meet's evidence. The Learned Counserand, he bed nut to advert The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat ea the wool ta the important evidence with respect to Carlini', which w. sack a few minutes before ten o'clock, when Prayers were read as Arm, now that the defence was dosed, as it had been When by the Bebop al Baum, mid the list stifled over. The c u m- ad ' for the Bill bad been tenpin:led. Berbera Kress stated, her et absent Peers was onspeally great. At twenty minutes pa* ten, Caused were called in, wbep that one evening at the inn she had occasion. as chambermaid,. The A thus resumed me Loom _ to carry water to Nergassi's bed-roam, between which and her Majesty's there was a dining-room. Now the dimositioa of the When I closed my Address to your Lordships last evening, I rooms bad not been attempted to be denied, and of course the had brought the examination of the evidence down nearly to die Hones was bound to believe what had been stated m that sub.. long voyage undertaken by her Royal Highness. In the course _ wet. pon entering the room, she saw aergami in bed, aid el that' ouroey, her Royal Highness, when at Jerusalem, oft- u land on of her suite titles of an Order of her ons in. h er Royal Highness sitting tip the hed---. Mr. Dix.—+6 The evidesee situnng. My Learned Friends opposite have stated, that was, 'she bad set on the bed:* this forms a substantive charge in the preamble of the Bin. The Anosum-Csnizasa. said, it was ridiculous to um any 'This, my Lords, is not the case; but it is one of those col- ver b al criticism u p on the sub j ect. It was evident that her lateral and corroborating circumstances which tend to prove Royal Highness was sitting on the bed when she Sent into the room. The it arms were intertwined—his was round the substantive charge. My Learned Friends have treated this her Dea—hu. upmwan_ her subject facetiously; but, my Lords, it is matter of grave and se- tan km arm od *wed up a , 'buieve7'icree.e,stu7muistuuilaigimaculta them rious import. It is not the institution of the Order, but the fact circumstance, instantly left the room. Now, how was this met! that Bergami, the favoured Bergami, is a Menthes of that Order. By Mr. Hownam's account of the frequent visits of the Qum It has been said, that the Order was instituted to reward those to the Grand Dube and the M vine ; but that witness had e her suite who accompanied her Majesty in her pilgrimage. of acknowledged that his recollection failed him as to the question, I object amin n mulm u cot Royal hli g hnes s es areatin g,.. al L Ord s _ s er whether her Royal Highness returned bons from the Grand w but L ' e ny that it was " rent an y ''"ll.'". _ Duke's between dinner and supper. His recollection was a De Mont bin deposed, that in the whole jimeney, a Princess of general one, and left a blank upon the most material point. In.‘ Wake, on the eye- of being Queen of England. omitted that deed there was an attempt to All tag that blank, by calling Vassali, solid ought never to be omitted in any establishment—the Di- wham was of the meet insiresefel kind. vine Service of the Protestant Church, for herself ad the Pro- This man remembered tittle of occurrences at saws part of her suite. No, my Lords, her Royal High- carbroe, but forgot every thing that took day he. nme's passion for this favourail man led her to accompany him fore sr attar that. Here the Learned Coonseri---read part of to the religious services of that religion which he professed, vassal% esidsmoe. titre ... mewl that the mud to neglect those religious duties which ought never to be or him samplassi g r wreett 7 tard the eriamina in ' tiou thief. _ neglected. Bat to speak more closely as to this Order of Sc. Ca- Neither Vassal ow Mamma had preyed that k was either ins. reline. The office of Grand Master is conferred on one whom , possible or karobabie that bie Rejal Higheess might have she elm* Colonel Ber g amt, al th ou g h he had never had hi g her rank ramped kome on Itfae of the evenings wkide she was at Carla in the Army than that of a Quarter-muter. Colonel Bergson, robe, between the time of ass .., The .....tase Count Franchina, Knight of Malta and ache Holy Sepulchre, is testimony td Kress was not to — lc e - ashee Z r y ; loose r r i : e i ee. mode Grand Master, and is to hold the dice for him and his dams at thine ipmemen, mtd the eta infereeces from heirs for ever. The diploma of Lieutenant Howmm is Biased them. Homan then that the fact mu es embus Kam by the Princess of Wales, and by Colonel Bergami, as Gestalt wore ... ehos the bloom and Betwai amns Amos ais,a Master, who has not omitted inserting the whole of hie titles.— by with Me arm road low asst-tide was aerate lodispeeddr. This fact, my Lords, more than any other, proves the familiarity u ' as M r. ftwassanes aura concession, that on amasses , of the parties. Wh y was Bergaini thus distin g uished ? What Intercourse muse Use existed between them. Barbara bees bad he done more than the rest of her Royal Highness's suite? had dersed ta another feet namely, that she bad band b i b, Oh, yes, be was her protector during the whole of the voyage bed of Beegaml a nosh. which she afterwards saw esherilmal this was the reason he was thus dignilled-.4hus honoured ! Highness. (The lammed Gentleman bees reed thet puss of The fact I leave to Tout Lordships' consideration. I might call Kreses " idioms) mud her 'sea tete‘oese sack a deoh or the mewl= of your Lordships to the party at Tewacina, where not ? the bad not, why ures ' net —l h '; — dame Ii Olds, or some a alireet bled of salutation took place with Bergami front the other a her majesty ' s finoide amandants. reduced la prowl w ? rest of the suite ' Aft " the vo y a g e re Jeruadens, her Royal other was seined to assume that the fact timid sot be conga- Highness returned to the Villa d'Este, where an alteration was diets& Hew, then, be would ask, was the drennastence of made in the sleeping apartments: When Mr. WMiams opened that ema h home in Bo ther bed to be asenantad for ? i s De the defence of her Majesty, be stated that be would prove that way but one ; an no other suppaddan man tut on adulterous this change of the bed -teems was made is cooseqessce of bar connection had when pines. The one wiwww. Barbara Royal Highness's bed-room smoking; end that an old door was Kress, had samad a third diet—the masks tie saw ea the bed. _ opened between the rooms; bat the Coultas/ foe the Defence, lrma hastresr, dm , an this lam d the evidence;who have had the archites.sad other witnesses who could banlrma set, their Lordships would weigh the frees of it is their own minds. proved that bet, have not been examined urea it. What are we subs tun, was the ;m . 0 ., esidenee ad this witness. H z , to infer from this, but that the irksome, ad not conactip to the Dea n had anbnads — a ;;C -- an the ammo be which mark 1 and therefore they did not demos attempt to contradict the bad givm her ttleilMOrf a but, in Ms (the Amenmereme• The change of the rooms was proved by Majocchi mad De Mont and remained unconteadieted. Author circumstance occurred rat's) opinion, °I" unjustly. Be had never ssisi any "Id many given with a greater air et truth. The emesommiele actor the long voyage, which had not bars contratileted, nor at- • egmeopil to be se, which, however, might have been refuted by non had cooveyed many vi). kidnuathas against the ass ter of this woman, but, as mual, ism a single wkals. ben been s toma witnesses, if the fact was not true. At Ihrn t eins, leo mimes Oath swears that the Prisms was very familiar reduced to throw the slightest spot er stain upon her. AOl the gross could not help e here again he sosplabiag of w ca thatWith Eargeml, dent they took delicate mantis together, and 1..' which had bean cleansed through the Public irons, when At oempany retired, he saw Bergami go up to the Prisms mad give her a hies. Were not this tree, then both this hnilvidna; sad against everY use who bad been produced as a witness for the prossanies. Asperakos legend "ensue belonging to bet Royal Highness's mks who had been cast epos her which was most Wm; there never was could Mee contradicted it ; but the character of the witness had a whims who stood more unlameached then this individual! not been attempted to be impeached. I will here observe, my Lards. that tins a —w— minims for the mu have --r Learned The Learned Geodesists next adverted to tie absenceof Baron Primes atialrildse Imes* either as to their pretheoe ebn. d'Ende' by whoa, as her Majesty's Counselp retended ,so muck meter or mandnet. notwithstanding the isesetises and impute. might have been dose to &eke the testimony et Barbara awn. elms that hem been heaped upon them. string s and 4 7 0 ;; ar Why bad this person not come over? What was there to me! as it is, that not ins rows dime Qom , or soy if the ,pieces vent him? He mold scarcely benne that his Learned Moods mendaned, has dared to my a mom wimp &alum/sloes for the were sedans in their dedre for his attendance. What did they thia such fact as this thews what mint be the remit The want topeoveimbis? Caddis have abetter memory than Fas hioned Ceased opposite, in speaking of Gaga* and another sail Chdelhe Sea l witness. who had deposed to miss the Nina* and Bareang ~" '"l e d mis u se, a< hs Royal skein as a gun en •decitovith lb* aims tweed rub ether's mk s clay et "..151.1.1 The name Ciralma had bent had mid that this ekedisatemes, K Use, would pews e ms**, birmaibids bet a l " ; the Qmen's Onmed had said poet d i , I st was aid from which It might ho is h os t . _ /bans the flossed for the DUI ought even to balm produced this I sow ami , si Ida has bass v o i d the file„,,- 4 s a li mai bedded DS a WIDIDID a '& 4 OIO4I ha, had no seirsethe whit. Oa the mini her Asia Highness at Qualm ) nor it* th• roma% The iosi!d Cesusismas crested PO ••• • • . ...~ -N ~~ • •••=:.IYI =MI full left abc Om Ch on dre can or' GOO tab lees ehai rah last wet titt con hay to' CA a' regi Yet the nag nse trek 'lei figl fail CI 61 eh