Star. — London, England, 1829-04-09 00:00:00

/kLipte, ..i4oAan/4.1 X-•. 144 -1 / 4 .„ . • • - .f.t 1 . •, - , .:-,*.• • ,••, - . : - ; l' ' v,41 1.• 1 • - . . • . . .. . -... . t• J o -1110..0..4 ' ' . • •.. . •.: . Ile . • C 'r .. , , • i • . k ‘%. \ • t • ' l. 111! s‘- .81 , • • ..._......„ r• •• • • , . • s‘l,,,,t„it a rpi ttis •• _ . •." • • T ' . r. .~~ t . ~.. ../. gIIMBER it-13.] • • SWIM ANXIOUS. TO PIINVENT IMPOSITION, . fA•Y and MARTIN reipectfully inform the Public ibri be, 'after ouch labour and at a very considerable et:. t. !qe 9 ll ll t•fto ParfaCtiOn a Label if snob singular construcdon • • givens* sitilLln uof execetloo, that they, trust will efectwally itiafti' Frauds that are 4aill peacoat:4.l a m ibe Ao McMinn to the following deso*ion of the Label will smarm %he genuine Blacking prepared by them. A pattern like Lace of a 41 1 colour coveta the pekcipal pert of the Labei, the name* of g and Msrtin bit Winced in white letters edged wick pink and and placed on a white ground , the address, • • g i t, HIGH-HOLBORN. )also white letters edged with pink and black, b ut pla ce d o n th e pattern, the signature and price at foot are black no a white iprossod,.tke preamble and directions for uair are printed a* before letters on "bite stountL-97, kligk-Holborn, Sept. It 3. VIAMILIES about to FURNISH. Will fi nd, ou - inspecting the Ware-rooms of HENRY L COOPER, si.;, iitZzsais eraVAT Wm's, the following Articles, at Prises reasonable, foe Furniture of speedos It* and Ma ' infection: • ' UPHO4STERT—Coseprisingtbe improved Elastic Stool Stufkg . Wit Carriage Cushions, Chain, Solis, Mamas% &c. 17 Iv akiltiqa to a. butelsome assortment of Bedstead 'rnleures..Wiadqw CondWes CW 1 4 1 • 1 6 bAIET TNORK.i4X 'the first quality and .IMategials—Abo Solid Furniture for Foreign Cilinajes. • lIIIIIPPING—Cabiew litt6tl up with Elegance and Moat* and Passengers' Requisites provided. IClAlRS—_Approtriate for Dish's, Drawing Rooms, Had ai•c• CARPETS —Super Brussels Catitlis, 41.6 d. per yard (no Inferior • quality kept), Kiddermhiner and Venetian equally moderate. WOKING6I 4 ABSZA—Froma the most hiagildeent to the sniffiest, for Chiati's, Piers, and Tellestm ; on the Raiser slaws, she Reduction will be toped to Amount • from Fifty to fieventy.five per Cent. CARVING and GI LDI N 0 --Some very beautiful specimens for • Cassel Tables, Glasses, fin. ' ~PAPILIIANGING and PAINTING—In the Richest mwell as the.Plainestlkyle. FUNERALS—Attended in the moat respectful manner, and,wre • _ tkular regard pa i l to litooemy. NOUSE AGENCY—Houses and Rotate egistered for•Lettimg • • o se Disposal, without Charge. „SAM; APPRAISEMENTS, AND COLLECTION OF RENTS, FUR§ITURR WAREHOUSED. L. COOPED, SS, BiamorseavetwaretWrtion, has the honour of being employed and patronised by mew of the Ann Families in ek.. Kingdom;' and, fur style and prim. • challenges competition with any rceqqatile Kos. bilehment. • •• Damn et pintos iixor."—Hoa. Thy house, and (in the cup elf life, That.honey-dnep) thy pledging wife! 11.11P,PINESS. " the gay ti •1111)1TMW of the mind," is :ILA insured by marriage ; dup.rictest tie nt perpetual friss& !run Heaven, censenting picaure.yrisis Tomos, pp! §i▪ shicii,ilys Johnsen 4 - we approaili In some degree of hwitsisditill with eekstial intelligence." /Previous, however, to entering into this hallowed obligation, k be ones en imperative duty. cut only to regulate the pennons, bet to cleanse the grower nature frskp those imporkka which the free. ikin of unrestricted pleasuiv stay hie. entailed upon it. Tio tltf *tikes of Such attention are attributable nutty of those lupins iestanees which, while they excite the vonsmiseradon of the bit ;odder, should also impress him with tbst fear of sulf.repsoods. Linurious habits will drank* the body—a residence 40 the Smile's will rela "the ells* libre—Vut more modally does the pivemiture infiituation a youth too frequently compromise the na• tarsi dignity into a oats of whence tbs seettlesa, engem niece than doubts the chance of veleL To all sock then 4rl 8 4 4 ftess anrailTfa. aftrb)g *Pas-il!Wilsrailaalar otamgeb, loacky ; Mr adiancr.apptar suqslifeo l F9 1 111 41 1 000 Arran by the imitiVied inn* of 40 yak's' Ponessful experience. The easy earei-et murk( tilla ark sienetickes disturbed by the enspenekti-of Oulu bleeping' which eonceimie the nuptial wreath -4er the female habit isorteu woutitotkpally vreak—yet.k canto,' otringthenek'ditfilificieut energy improved into funnierial pow. elelf'inenriyithilitie tomatoes, as well as in'enry eckgatiop of.the getseestin 'economy, we plbtlie we ability to rice ass 4, Old eriec e frect. &rangy solicitetsito expel the ' unfeelleillapyrie fyont the position so preausupteiandy taken. up, we deviate Lonna rent trinciar nit 4 .6 t b!'0 1 0 401 %; feel Is war Nan • ostaitura le integrity Ws. guiltier. se the Ladle otof SSs ainiee. refer the sisfreyiut cointnuilef cliber. SCX. (especially thoseces* tir . fta Intl nutrimental lik) ai once. mg bouse,where daily personal CanelailaldP,l and *WO Entelthe eittrit6ifi iiimediakly answered.; *ye. now •tontais • wok. Wen The Mein "and Mediate, Whkh can be (orwattlest to any Fr of 111 . e wat4 heweseudiatast. ' • GOSS and taa..*VC. Sorsiestaa.. N. 1 2 Bmv.°/4 . a p a ngtleattot, &madam. wr. Just publiskii4Octrittets4 l. Tbs./low of,llae‘ ▪ h alnids•Coinmebtarieli*. 0.4)4 1 *444!. *4 kly.amatta, iddtpaied ezdasivet/ to the Fria* . Sap.- May be had at 14 ]'Bears: treat. 114. Finet*iess; di; catherine.atteet, Strands 414 ""al; .1 114 ttPij, ia. ratar.msstr, -raw ‘. and Chan's.. RN !alas'', "NW. ; porter.- TV, arg00.411“10 • Dahlia; SlPPbtui, IS*/ irrotkOta, ¢latiaw,; Caltagilniassolakesitk; Sibee,ibn. links/kWh Sat• W . . • iMP 4 FAI • Witg lAX If OUST LORDS A $. • , OF mu. 711•110e.ot . 64111)4$ psios*sd rerldelk theinhabb tams el' t _htisielltorsb; for the remereat at Mil. Disabilities. 11W Xad Of Slid, _11.44Y presented a Wedgies fres the ot a pariah to are, 'phut .y farther Camas to the Roman ,Cethelies. The Ms before the Home were forwarded In their respeedve . Matquls of L42131)PW31. fraikttlEe redden to foitoof if Willman Catholic . Relicf.)6ll. fro mule freeholders of the 4e - say it Wilts: Lod Vat4N Ka l 4re pt sToltdon.e. WWI soy farther OM eta** to ihe "Rosa . t i e 1 rept a,pasia Th is Po• titbit else referred to a whir* prevailkida cassia blade ,lo the Ideditermose, ciesjieeng Ihe Haigh, troops to asted•fle . man "Cathode irucesaleassed wipe) , ea OP . - 14111 ! • " ., a *salmi giaaik. at sa deorOol, gra. which tbe• iababliants relied to Fiesta them inset els pilaw, was " 1 /114P I Z tak°* to be werikett 1a the tiedlrterlelets• Wen these t eAkusjueaibo troops elbib weressmisiledro wend at° !clew s to !air imp ,n al .martillstiem rho isimul wash 171/1 took place was Cafe. Ike Hoke of W ILL1.11.4071:0N kaesv.aathiteref lie partials latabee ; but he had served in many purm of air weal, and.had las btu is any rise wbere . reteer was not paid by she military SheatibAsked mbieva Coals of .ClOB4/P..He sewer ko•w 114111 ° 1 o °O. *to*, iu wbicb oi,,Weeitele boatmen wads. • This ilat Harty where eertall;asSere'• at artillery refunds° it. i white; They *ere 'triiid,.sabeequimly by a Curt blenfels mod !#afttere4" - Por for fiLlere el Storm to the aliplaas.wrsaias 4: 4l: sire for WtobaAlowto tig•oc.lerse4 their 01 .°4 1 r was, arks. oPProooti kihke tuNeolr• • _soot tunts c r aserraskiot Frew li °44 41 ' u f h " :1 " Wi fel *wanes. the: Pena* weaudaid .s. :ergo eke 44 K 4 WA N Oleo Preen:Jed Joelibleei s theaerm *Est • from isic t r t ialts the snake a, Domed pat Atoirodhoth • *)ALB pretested Oahe ratig4 o l 4 _T i kt# l. flf ICHMONlkpreseutil sigmas .L'etition, very alimatttli Ovid, trop the city 'if Wake. • MUMAJ CATUOLIc , 11111.1111, SILL, ' • The Doke of WELLINGTON alloyed Oisi the !toe= Cat Ao• MOM 41. recoosoffitelf..- " • • • bekkg . nred, « That ee Peer prolamin the Ream Carle,* religiose; and Ile pigeon proloreilisg the 4iesisaro•Oitbellite blialltwbe WWI be retinue rise: Mositibet et the tharde it ~e sr ettrilbsesigrebkei lilting Al' "Milli it tidier aMg 1 . 11 Porliaiwitt le-perespely oinks, be dub take sad sepeielbe the oat¢+ 1 04111,!.00., • • • • . • &mid .YOS rose ,t .r the p9rpiria. of, ptertin,g Om_tiltt ! 'sot%;Ca; the claisito 411#0,:be . ,tiirp4Wd i d traatieVitit LE ' ords * Ws a prowiiimary, titt,uinst belt pros it i lett that sir Sable I.—rd belt., a Remote Cathittc: &this ?Aloft be esititlid• to sir ,o trititie Pathowirit: ti was desiitiab • MIMI itAr: . APHili NM - . .• that these words should be ilitrodueed sa a peolitiOglarl liteasod the. ygoeuils upon .which he proposed them, he.. wished particularly to draw• the• attestitin:ef- the, Noide.Dake at the head of his Majesty's:C(o*N_ Wr which were these—ln th e oath to be token4bY...*Ontaa: Catholics were the words—u And Ido solentulp swear that I never will exercise any privilege to which. lAS I or .may be entitled to disturb or weaken the Protestant relights or Protestant government in this liitfgdasi~ :.• He did not know if the N.able Duke was noralget she Oath, *hich Roman Catholic Bishops and, PriestaAffile Obliged t.i swim to the Pope, but to hint it. eppeared so completely contrary to the oath tot admitting;Catholici ii it t Pill figment, that he could .nokevoicirepeating. one particular passage in it—H:Jura, honores,,privilegta,.et auctoritent sancta Bonsai. occlesite, Domini roam Pap* et succenorom predictoruns coiner**, dello. dere, augere, et prontotiere. curable Now, b .-*oild say that any person, if, be were admitted into Pattie. meat, would be iocapable of taking, that oath who had previously taken the oath to which itobed just adsartett, and therefore be should propose the insatiate of-thoet words as a provisionary c l a n se . if . any &Ida •14141/ was desirous of looking at the oath be could show at to him. The Earl of ROSSLYN objected to the introduction of the words proposed by tbo•Noble Lord, .10r-which he could. see no reason whatever. - It the lioble.Lood thought proper to read one part of the oath takenilsy Roman Catholic. Bishops be thought he ought to have gone on and read the whole. fie (Lord lionlyn). dish not known, the precise Lstin.vrotdis bat Ite•beliegod , the import of the words sworn to by all Eighth Ronson C.stbolic Bishops was, that they mold .not .laterfece with .any attempt to exclude or diminish. the laerfel right,of the King of Great Britain, or infringe any-ni Abe tetabli hed lases.of the realm. ,Now, if theytwoh an oath to this effect, he did not apprehend that any danger could result to the Constitution, or that-the au. thority of the King .vra. likely to be injured. • Lord KENNON still contended that the oaths were quite incompatible with.each tither: • He offered the! Noble Earl the oath, an estractfroon which he had just road. If Noble Lords were otiopiniou that these oaths were incompatible -they ought tcitconsont 10 the in troduction of the words- he had proposed. He coo.. sidered them to be quite incompstible, and, therefore, he thought it his dolt to move fur the insertion of the . clan*. Lord ELLENBORO.U.GH thought, if the Noble Lord would rake the babble to refer •tb the seldom* damned by Di. Doyle borate the House of Lord, ia: 10125. be would find that ao addition was made to that • oath by Eqglish Romeo Catholic Bishops. 'which would' show the Nikle Lord that be was mistakes its hie up• preheosious. The Noble Earl having read an extract from the oath. • Loud ICENiOW•asid that which had been stated by' the Noble Lord was not-at all to tbe•plprposed •He (Lord Keay° , ) stated that thole two oaths were qi alto iocompatible the oaf with the otheep.and he could eat see how a person could take the one who hatrevlowsly takco the other. • Earl BATHURST said the .oaths were eithev soap patible or incompatible. If they were compatible there was as end to the argument of the Nobtabled (Kenyon); and if they were incompatible then a Roman Catholic Bishop seas as completely excluded froths seat in the Haute after the Bill -had passed as if it had never passed. • Lord KENYON said be would not - devil the Hooey ea she sawadnioni at present; but ae a 'stew of prindplii ha Amid deem Ella duty to bring the question again Wore abs Home urn the brines' up of the report. Tha amendment was then negatived radioed a divishis, and the tlaussagreed to. the reading of the asst clime, empetwaring Roman Csholia Peers toll, elected, and also to vote for Maim Cathollas to sit as represewative Peers for !rased and ticatlaid, The Earl of VERULAM stated that be had a new clause to propose to prevent any future Prime Minister from ieundating the Hoese with Roman Catholic Peers. To guard against such an'event he begged leave to pro. pose le clause similar 'to that which was to be found in the Act of Union, and by which the King was prevented from cseating any new Peer fur Ireland bald tbtee Peerages were extinct. Tb. Rad of ROSSIeTtt-tbouglit is better that an the clauses el the t I IL should he yeast of betas say new clauses were pro posed. A dmidtary cenvoriation thin arose as to the pramioty of petting the'questkat on the proposed clause at this partkular stage of the proceedings. The 'Noble CHAIRMAN thee Tipt the question on the clause °Art.by the Rat! of Virulent. • Th purport of the clams was, ie lilsiassy should net hay she power of treating a new Raman Catholic Peerage until direr& the Peerages possessed by Roman Cathodic Peen became estiest." ' Lcird.REDERDALE thought. it was impossible for the* LOrdsbips to adopt the clause stow proposed. A Peerage, Ail', now he, held. by a Protestant, and the mg .bplder might be.a Rowan. Catholic, as in the case tif.the late Duka cif, &Welk. and the present. Religion waexat hereditat y ap well as-the Peerage, and therefore battened it would he impossible to. recognise the. prin. ciplp tantaioed in the. clause proposed- by the. Noble Earl (Verulans). The Duke.of WALLINGTON. thought that , if the, Noble Earl's clause was adopted, it would establish a new, Catholic question spoil new •principles. The pro-' position•went to abridge,bia blajestra prerogative apace ogle of du most osllllolpol enclosed'. of • tosegirunioe • behest ere! leazdfof,- °googly, that ikAtinistee, of the Ciown• Mien inundate that House with Romeo Cs. thalic.Peets, In hip opiaiou xiae observation of the No. We and..Leattied- Lord (Iledevisle),; that -religion was , not, hned Ugh erm pcsfemly conclablee.ca the question. The Marquks of:LONDONDERRY did sot consider die.clausean tbs. Act of Union-retorted -se by the Noble Eprl (Veittberaht; xlwanctut desirable in that Act.. It 4 1 4 4 4)xe114 4 1 e 4 donr.-10, veil great fiacenrenience, and when it was now'proposed to alter the system,. it should be Joao Jo 04 10 give *a Jade diaratiatactioa -as possible. Ile agreed J with , the .Noble Dike (Webing!ast) 'that if the claose.vraf added to lbe.Bille per. CalliZtlic - goof dim .. 4 0 114 ..ban P.oolngue'id *TM .reir.; and he be liend Ahme Pats . isoLaap . Noble . Lord. wh o • wou ld • oot coaeur•wisbabins- in flunkies, that if the question wa . ks be settled as all it should be settled finatty. He en treated the . Noble . Earl‘ therefore, to withdraw the clear, which -tould produce no satisfactory effect. I The Earl of VERIILAM said he was not much in love witb.the clause sow 'sloppiest. any more than with ihe general principles of the UM. and if it was solid ated drat ie. would produce any bad consequences, be ad so objection to withdrww is. • • . . i Tie.elooe worth', withdrawn; ugh dbrimisba %nisi beau 0 ; AR sp a ?Flail al 0 1 00 t. • • • . ' t , ' " Loyd kA lOWA* begged m ogre a few observe rinse 04 this sohjart, as it eeinarded.thollopmernatiOel Pager of Soodaad and tbe:Aet of-Union. It urassaid thet.the snarl/mono in itlie.Act of.Ahli.4 was a . tern.. votary arrangemett.eapahle of being altered; aotthis doctrinaires aasumed in coosequenecot the words mot• tabled in the VVJ title, is which* mils vested that " wedge shoelakeonainee so be token *mill the United Parliament .made further porridges taken. entity Now, °he could not mimeos in the interpretation khe tof .Uniots givea .by those-who argued akin sheaath. might .boo done .away. with, andt.Rowsint Urkbehei- ed. mined to seat. in FatlfiSMlNltt i merely ow the streeptbel dio -words he had oilseed. In . the next mite* of itie Act- of Union there was a complete incorporators of the atv oLlikutlarid, preveatieg Catholics frototheldlitg. ea/ °Aces in that -cooties y. Ttfis law-wee contained in an Act of che.Scotels. Per Samna called*. CI aintsifiltiatttl and that Act. was inclededs.e• monism in, tae-Att Woo. Ap_Oreat Britain it-was, to ,be observed tha . 1Q01313 Catholics were cal j pnweated frame rahisitthele tests. in tira.Logialetore . aadlsolskossertain ofseeS , 44 as milk; but iwiliotioud they-were eschadalithr stain* law; arid whin bc.cootended eras. that thadhlri artiart comely empoiered Barliansent to alter. she 'boded ez.i cluaion by mbstitutiegany caber oath, but otsittaalrei one of the fandamantal articles of the,Usioo ; br .ena- Wino Eamon Catholics toesit.in.Parliaosenr. Thnsera title of the Act of ,Uoion .wap also confiraned.bra4sh.. *serpent Act for the regulation of the election of.Scotth Peers. The), dila and Learned Lord . on' theWordsack in trying questing, appeared daubtfid -whether 4* Dot ibis- mature wasa.violatiosi of.the An of Union boi..al all eventsohe conceived.that, on the.piewel ne..! cesiity, the Act of Union ought to be thrown over board. In his (Lout Fasehane.),opinion, this-measure was a violation of the Act of Union. and yield only be' raved on the ground of necessity.; and he must be el.: lowed to say that, in his.opinian, the necessity had not! been made out. The Earl of ROSEBERRY contended .that. this MI6: sore was not a violation of the Act of Union.oith Scot. land in sot of its clones. .hloch hid been said already . QA the subject.; but he thought there wzre one or taw coosiderations•which had not been sulficiently brooght l to their Lordships' attention. He thought it was tune: impossible thatihe Act of the Scotch Parliament al.' hided to by chalMoble Lord who bad jest spoken.eould, have been intended to be held as a schematise part the Act of Union far. ever. That • particular claim could never have been to cialiane in force perpe wally, when it was 31411111 in a preceding. clause that those clauses should remain in force unta the United Pad's- Mat " aide further provisions therein." When the fundamental prineiples of the Act of Union were ram dared capable of change, it was quit: impossible that the minor principles should have been rendered perpe tual. That this measure was not a breach of the Act of Upton in any of its essential pans, was solLiarsll proved by the condole( of the people of Sc ;dead thaw selves, and by that of their Representatives. Only Sae eat of feetrave •• Members of the other, House repre senting Scotland had voted against the Bill. and in that House only friar of the sixteen Scotch Peers bad voted egoimMit. Oat of thirty-five - Scotch Peers Minn Peerages in Scotl a nd , and also being Peers Of England. thirty had voted for the Bill. and only 6:e against it ; and of nineteen English Patti who had property is Scotland,• bat were not Scotch Peen, all had voted in favour et the Bill. A large meeting had been held in Edinbuigh, too, when a Petition was agreed to in fa vour of the measure, and at that meeting persons met who had newer agreed on any political question before. The Represoutatives of Scotland and the inhabitant's/ that country .were therefore favourable to the measure. and it was not at all likely that they should be so. if they_ coosidered that the Bill was a violation of the Act of lion, or that it trenched upon CIO privileges of their country. Lord PLUME/ITT braid so resist their Loritiolpo that the ebosoVator easolderatioa h A sothiog to &with the Act of Union, and tar they were sow arguing ow a abject which appliotrather to asetther doom Lord iiEXLEY admitted that, when the two hide pendent Legislatures of England and Scotland became united. a supreme power was lodge& is them to alter the faking laws, or any of the articles of Union, in case of necessity. Net a single argument. however, - in Isis opinion, had been urged to proves the necessity. or even the expediency of &violation of the Act of Union. By violating thiu.solemaAet in this case, too.a precedent would.be open for a violation of the Irish Act vi Union. The rights of the Irish. Church, which .be and many others considered woe greatly endangered by the gene ral measure, were solemnly recognised in the Irish Act of Union ; and when they dealt so lightly with articles of the Act of Union witlrficotl kola sotto be sup posed that they should. be much-moss delicate with ' specs to the• kisbAct el Union, which might be altered upon any allegesigroend of necessity.. It was said.that a great 'majority of the Scotch Peers mere favourable to the-epeaseie, and :smelted to this siotsfois of the Union. %opts as mien on the part of the Itepretentatires of qemtland did not satisfy him as. to the propriety of the tiMispres-and. men if the opinioo of the people of Scot litukwaa.in /erosive( the viola t ion, it wooliftnot alter tits question ; for-its such 'lease it was orces.ar yto look fetcher than to the popular voice. Besides, it was by nu means. to .be isfersed that. biteisenetheScoseh lie piesestatives voted for the-general niesserei they ars freved.of shit vielation'of the Act of Union. In con clusion, he m;ght observe that this panache question was of more importance than their Lordships seemed to consider. The general willentrewaS as alteration of the-general .priseiples of the Vonstitution ; and to this was added an infractioael the solemn treaty eructed into with an independeutLegislatuae. Viscount MELVILLE thought that their Lordships had better have 'taken some other opportunity foe dis cussing the question as regarded Scotlind. The whole question DOW was as to the right.of llamas Catholics to thetegislature? He• was surpriled' his Noble Friend who had just sat-down should attach such hats- portant* to this measure as it reset del Scotland. He admitted it might. be,of impost:meet° consider whether they should admit Roman Catholic Members. to sit for Fatigland•iled Ireland;-but of to, ti-ave Members who were'. returned' for Scotland, their Lordships would admit that there could not be much danger in maiting Roman. Catholics eligible when he sold then 'there was only one Catholic. PM.' who COlll.l vote for . 11 repreien tatimmad he believed about ten of a down heeholders.- It.wis certainly a violation of the Accol Usioa.to admit one bunritoChish Isembets in 'addition Mau the united' nsOiluellmi.husikhres done for the•georrat• good' ,be empire. It there was any general feeling amongst u3l• Szvarnisicr.. the Stottbthistilitilk 1100 Crete iivadled; Wit As o! Union said 'that 'the excleiinn of Remain Catholics 'formed i part bf thlit Act, which *4 in:iolite could hot be tepeelici, even, in a/credence with aides hi 'the people. and for the /coeval good; their Lordship. 'ankh' tie vtritrig io incredhig Scotland"' •thelmesenC NI Bat his - opiaioo . wit, that the , j. , s , it y of the i hid ligent peolsleof Scathed *ere iq fah tot the Bill, aid that; thotigh a riuMber PetitiOne been ovesrenid, vilified • by persons yeti respectable thriiilineof life; he - betievJJ that, from their rank encletyi it ttio n likely that nee ors of I thalami feed the Act of Union. Olfieliiheieottipleined of . sriotated. hr proof of this ispidioa 'be begged to their ibeitdvhipt to the "deterieinatiOn wilieh the 4 eatnedmirkpirstrite47 of idea . iss'lkodied had ces--.lte Meant- the ?fi s hy tee es of'Scottats-thear ' ' or- *boil laid &elated' that' they would noe . sige ; 'lion-agate* this Bill ;'theie Gentle/nen Certainly twit histologist ro'thic determined* if they did not fp pett to bd Mai oaf hi Melt noels - ilia B 7 the people in genera. He thought it Would be absurd and p 'pederast' for theii Lhrdshipi to descend to a minim •separate legidatiori for Seorland *hen the people' couotry did' nor ell upon them to do so. The Rol cif ELDON ilothely agreed Pith the L'otd that it was entipetest for . the United Parham:toot arasakeinty alterations in the lases established by the Act of Unica with Scotland tbat might be considered neceerary'for - chef general pod. The Act of Union with -Ireland ulnae pear way tarecognize *bat tight, bet 'he could' not awe With - the Noble Lord that the people ef Scotland were in favour of this measure being ea.. tended to thatenantry. On the contrary, be thought the people of Scotland would be diaatisfsed if this measure were carried. If their Lordships would refer .to the Bill of Rights of Scotland. which ought to be as 'mach respected as the Bill Uf Rights for England. they 'wrioutd - seafrom WISE no Papist could sit in the Paslia sent of that country, and though the Act of Unite' did . netinettioa that no Pao4 Should sit. yet the fifth and sixth °Matra Anne, which Wife aiw improvement ci the Act - ot r Ualls, dekla4d that all those Acts %inch she paised'bifole the Act of Unica should have the use force and effect as the Act itself. and, coosequenny, . ho Papist could - elm or be elected in Scotland. lie did not referio any oaths by wihicb Nimes) Car t belicsinight te - rsehrand, but ma* to thucharicthy of those ,Tho wire vidd to be estleded. He thought, if cite feeling of the people of Scotland was to be jedgerkby . the votes of the Scotch Members, their Lordships aiOuld not look to the votes =of this yea? alone, bat look a little back to the vetei tor the `last or three leers. Lord flittilAVEN said, that the let at Wen with atetland - did bat einteln bole chutes landed to by the Noble Lard. The Vat! of ELDON es What be bad said was, that the &gads Parliament adepthd these Acts which had bees previensly joined ly the lkeish Patitansest. Lord PLVNt thou g ht the law was quite clear on thesubject.. There was an Act pasted by the Par liament of Scotland establishing. the Church of Stet land.-and an Act paste.) by the Parliament of England establishing the, Church of E 'gland. They *ere de clared by the Act 4 f Union to be fundamental and On• alterable lawil - ; and they. in fact. funned Alie Act of Union—they made the Act of Union complete. And, after this let had been complete, an Act was passed to regulate election.; which said that those previ.as Acta referred to b the Noble and Learned Lord geese to be of the tame force add value as tie Act of Elution itself; but they weld net declared to be fundamental or un alterable laws. No doubt the Act declared that Papists Could aotelect or be elected; bet this Act only referred to members al estates, and m a d e is reference to.repre sentatiee Peer's.' He was 'oily the Noble and Learned Lord seethed ta differ with him on this subject ; but he wootd beg of Ines loOk 'carefully into the Act of Unfit, and he *hihire he would agree with him. The Earl of 'MOON said he would comply with the Noble Lord's . liqihes and fool into the Act; bet, as he had ahead/ aderiitted the coMpetency of the united Parliament' to repeat the lass alluded to, he could have no purpose its doing so but in deference to the sidles of the Noble Lord, and to satibh those Mho had en. timed petitions to his hands, and who were of opinion that the Act of Union would be violated by this repeal. Lord DUNCAN did not rise to offer any opinion on the Act of Union, but merely to repeat what bad been said' by his Noble Relative (Lord Melville), that tie general feeling of Scotland. was in favour of this sea* sure. He knew that many petitions bid been presented against it; but When be knew the means which had been taken to procure signatuor, and the opinion which bad been spread that his Majesty, Ministers intended establishing Popery in the country. he was surprised that in so Protestant a city as Edinburgh, instead rf 17;000, that there were not forty thousand signature, to the petition refesred tn. He knew, however, that since the speech of Dr. Chalmers many, even of those who had signed that petition. bad charged their minds. The Sul eV 'HA DDINGTON ssiteatted the original dense. . The clanar, and the liar that followed, peeekl withost aale44 Oaths thoesohnitalarCatholies to Perliament wad elleeti`of Slate, escesnitta•the awes of Lord Chsaweifor of )Mead, Lord cheocelleref Inlaid; and Lord Lieutenant of Inked, Lord KENYON thonght . that the Ace of First M. sister in tbeCabiutt, and other impatient AC011,1004 be among the' enacted ofEcei. He should *therefore acme, as an Amendment, that before the words Lord High Chancellor of England, there be inserted the fol. lowing words t I • a The First Lid tailaft Slifeetre treageri, the Land Praha* of the Coen& the-Lowl'Frier Seel, the Mutat et the On/Mae, aad the Fine Lod Oahe Adadrake, or Lea Hieb Adiairak" Lord HOLLAND-thought the Nio, Loaf mistalt the p/inciplo of the exception in•the Clause. The °Miceli enumerated in the clause fleas which ROOM Catholict wire cis luded tad -not been selected on accoust of 'belt ' political importance, but on acertact of the palatial nature of tbek faaetimuk Those appointments were not merely political. but partook in souse degree of the exercise of the Yin!. Supremacy in ecelesiastscal affairs. For instance, the Lord High Chancellor posses•rdi as annexed to his office, the right' of distributing Chealf patronage of a cethafe • take, and that -"ahem ben obliged to.tiko Use King . .. pleasure on the matter. Was it Dot so P—(to the Lard Chancellor). • The LORD CHANCELLOR mawiteaL Lisrd HOLLAND —With a view, than, to Mauve. *the aaalogi of a P r ot estant Ki ng , it was neeemery, ip framing the present Bill, either- to • exclude Catholics ; froaktlie office of Lord Chancellor, and other aka ikokaiiog similar patronage, or to masilMe it' by de. priiiatihe Lard Cbancebor of. all Cbarch•pstrunage. 'The ezeeptivo Of the 61E4 c f Lord Chancellor from the number opened to Catholics was the most :claim plan. , • s /ta 00 4 -14 /14., Cr. ii ibe Act inhales ice 14 id* des Asset • lend la be so. fee* Pfli bed :able in rank in Ind bed 4 being refer is iciest d mos no oat a Pei• r would not q• MO. nd so sod • , of this Male 1 liemeet the s b iderid I it on with M. bet ' people ins es. bought if this