Star. — London, England, 1830-06-02 00:00:00

BISHOP OF LONDON. We abridge the following letter, which has just ep peared in the British Co-Orcrator, in reply to the Bishop's letter on the neglect of the Sunday : " It is not for the purpose of stimulating or directing ) our Lordship's exertions in the suppression of vice that I uov.- feel emboldened to make this address. Notwith standing the pertinacious silence of the Athenian inqui sitors of the day as to your Lordship's " pious and charitable deeds," I feel assured that you would not have felt yourself compelled to descend from your appointed post of dignified elevation, to reprove the occasional transgressions of your inferiors, had you not already vainly exhausted your endeavours to put a stop to the C. pry day excesses of your peers. " The painful emotions excited by a consciousness of the magnitude and inveteracy of those vices, the Sunday i:rr.ctice of which your Lordship labours to check, are much augmented by the intimation given in the com mencement of your letter, that " the number of the parochial clergy, whose special duty it is to watch and to oppose their progress, is notoriously and lamentably in adequate to the extent of the province intrusted to them." The former of these facts, the nature of the vices thus exposed, their hideous, their increasing enormity in the " first Protestant church of Europe," the founder of Bible societies, and the focus of religious missions to every region of the heathen world, is sufficiently appal ling; but the paucity of the agents in whose hands alone your Lordship seems to think the remedy is placed, must change alarm into despondency ; particularly when we consider that the want of pecuniary means cannot be the cause of such deficiency ; for I am convinced your Lord ship will agree with me in the conclusion, that if the whole of the sum annually drawn from the inhabitants of London and Westminster for ecclesiastical purposes, was fairly calculated and duly apportioned, the amount would be found amply sufficient to afford adequate remunera tion to a competent number of qualified assistants in aid of your Lordship's efforts; more especially as such pecu niary exactions from the earnings of the people are in tended tnr the remuneration of those who devote them selves by a solemn oath and pledge—to use the words of your Lordship's most appropriate quotation,—' not to la bour for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth to everlasting life.' Agreeing, there fore, as I must, with your Lordship, as to the melancholy deficiency in number of those on whom you calculate for assistance, and equally convinced that their number will only increase with the increase of the 'pecuniary contri butions drawn from the labours of the industrious to sepply those chosen agents with what they deem neces sary for enjoying most of the comforts and some of the luxuries of life, it is, I must acknowledge, a melancholy reflection that the savoury vapour of the flesh-pots of Egypt is the cloud by which too many of the guardians of the ark of the new covenant are guided in conducting the countless multitudes of their followers during their pilgrimage through this wilderness of vice to the expected land of promise. " But, my Lord, there is at least one circumstance to console and cheer you in your exertions ; and to point your attention to this circumstance is the main object of my address. If the number of your paid auxiliaries be small, it must be consolatory, it must be encouraging, to be assured that the cause you advocate, the cause of so briety and temperance, has no small number of voluntary unpaid advocates. I had indeed hoped, that before I came to the conclusion of a tract, which, small as it is in hulk, discloses such a mass of accumulating corruption, I should have met with some allusion to the efforts of those, whose humble, disinterested agency is now most actively exerted in the cause of sobriety, of truth, and of , virtue. And I consider your Lordship's silence as to a fact, the knowledge of which would have cheered your spirit in the relation, and animated those who think with you in the perusal, solely to your ignorance of the exist ence of a body, which, being chiefly formed from among the lower classes, are consigned by your Lordship ' to the patient and unobtrusive labours of those faithful teachers' the inferior clergy, while your Lordship, with due regard to your exalted rank and station, confines your exertions to those among the higher grades, who, to use your own energetic language, do all in their power to render your efforts ineffectual, by their careless ness, their indifference, and their evil example.' Yes, my Lord, I feel confident that your zealous wish for the universal spread of truth will be gratified by knowing that in the very heart of this Circean hogsty, in the midst of this deluge of profligacy wherein you have vainly sought for a spot to rest your hope that the waters of corruption were assuaging, a few at least are to be found who employ the leisure of Sunday in a manner totally different from what you describe, as being habi tual among the great mass of the population of this me tropolis. A few at least have seen the deplorable state of public manners—the total disregard of those social feelings which teach us that the surest means of securing our own best interests is by promoting those of our neighbour—the universal prevalence of that undisguised selfishness that looks solely and incessantly to its own in dividual gratification,—the arrogance of overabundant wealth, fencing itself in on every side by the terrors of the prison and the halter—the recklessness of hopeless destitution that courts crime for the shelter of a prison, and too often meets the clergyman, for the first time, in company with the executioner—a few, I say, have con templated this chaos of the conflicting elements of so ciety, and have resolved to seek a remedy, not by re proaching the rich for their excesses, or by taunting the poor with their degradation, but by applying the leisure hours of Sunday in discussing, soberly and calmly, ques tions whose solution, they hope, will lead to a satisfac tory analysis of the confusion of conflicting opinions and practices in which they perceive rich and poor, learned and 4aorant, clergy and laity to be, so long, so hope lowly entangled. They have already analysed, and hope they are not far from arriving at a satisfactory answer to the momentous question from which Pilate turned away, and on which his victim was silent,—What is truth ? They hope, by this clue, to unravel the strange mystery of error in which mankind has been so long involved, and from which no system of religion is free. They have endeavoured to trace the character of man from his for mation, to ascertain how it has been made the extra ordinary, the anomalous compound it now exhibits, and to discover how it can be raised to that state of high in tellectual elevation, of which we know it to be capable." ALARMING FlRE.—About eleven o'clock last night a tire of the most alartuing nature broke out in the house No. SO, Rahaer-street, Goswell-street-road, lately occu pied by a Mr. Moore, Mit, about three weeks ago, was taken by two ladies for the purpose of letting that part of ' the house which they wanted not fot their own purposes. The accident was alarming by the fact of a careless ser iant girl having ignited a parcel of wooden shavings in the lower part of the hank, and in two or three, minutes ',hereafter thti•whote . )idude was. ip such ilaine that the innuitediwith difficulty saved their lives. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, JuxE 1. LORD ♦. COOPRR AND 'PRATT. Mr. POLLOCK (Mr. Alexander with him) stated that this was an action to recover the value of some wool which had been consigned to him. There were several counts in the declaration, the last of which was a count in trover, upon which the whole case turned. The plainti ff advanced the sum of 5,0001. to a person named O'Brien, secured upon bills of lading of a quantity of wool, and a policy of insurance upon the same. The wool arrived in due time from Spain, and was lodged in the warehouse of the defendant. The plaintiff's clerk took an account of the marks and numbers of the wool, and in course of his business the plaintiff sold the wool, and when he wanted to deliver the wool to his customers, the defendants set up the claim of a firm of Loughlan and Co. upon part of the wool, and the plaintiff was obliged to pay 5001. to get the wool for his customers. The present action was brought to recover that sum. Mr. CAMPBELL, for the defendant, here interrupted the Learned Counsel, and said he could prove a lien upon the wool in Loughlan and Co. previous to the transaction between O'Brien and the plaintiff. He then called Andrew Loughlan, jun. one of the firm of Loughlan and Co. who proved that they advanced to O'Brien 2,0001. in the beginning of April, 1829. It was secured partly upon the bill of lading of 112 bags of wool. Mr. POLLOCK then said, this evidence put him out of Court. He therefore must submit to a nonsuit. The plaintiff was then nonsuited. OLD BAILEY SESSIO , June 1. — a ._ _ OLD COURT. _ _ John Barnes, a respectable looking man, aged 30, was indicted for stealing, on the 21st of April last, sixty-one silver plates and other articles, value 4001. the property of the Marquis of Bath. The prisoner formerly lived in his Lordship's service as under-butler. Mr. ALLEY submitted there was not sufficient evidence to go to the Jury. Mr. Baron VAUGHAN said he should certainly leave the case for the decision of the Jury. The prisoner, on being called on for his defence, merely declared that he was innocent of the charge against him. The Marchioness of Westmeath, and several other wit nesses, gave the prisoner an excellent character. Mr. Baron VAUGHAN summed up the evidence at great length, and the Jury, after a few minutes' delibe ration, returned a verdict of—Not Guilty. The announcement of this verdict was received with clapping of hands, and other demonstrations of joy by the prisoner's friends, a number of whom were in the gallery. Mr. Baron VA UG HAN—Shame ! Shame! We are not in a theatre : such conduct is disgusting, and if re peated I shall immediately order the persons to be turned out of Court. Prisoner, you have had a narrow escape. The prisoner was then arraigned on a second indict ment, for stealing three dozen of drinking-glasses, the property of the Marquis of Bath. Mr. A DOLPH us stated the case for the prosecution. It was proved by the Marquis's butler that he missed a quantity of glass from his Lordship's stock, and that the glass produced by Gardiner, the officer, and stated by him to have been found at the prisoner's residence in Adam-street, Edgeware-road, resembled in pattern and ' I general description those used in the Marquis's family. The Steward also gave evidence of certain admissions made by the prisoner as the officer was conveying him from Roehampton to London, on the morning of his ap prehension.—The prisoner said that if he must tell the truth he might as well acknowledge having taken part of l the glass. For the defence a witness was called, who stated that he had sold the prisoner glass of the description of some portion of that produced about nine months ago ; and other witnesses gave the prisoner a good character for honesty. Mr. Baron VAUGHAN summed up the evidence, and the jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Thomas Crockford, aged 35, was indicted for felo niously assaulting Elizabeth Lloyd, a child under ten years of age, and Sarah Reed, aged 19, with aiding and assisting in the perpetration of the felony. The prosecutrix stated that she resided with her pa rents, in Bethnal Green. She knew the prisoner Crockford ; the other prisoner, Sarah Reed, lived in the neighbourhood of her parents. On Monday three weeks she saw the prisoner, Sarah Reed, standing opposite her residence, and she called witness over and asked her would she take a walk with her. Witness consented, and the prisoner Crockford followed them to wards the Crown and Anchor public-house. The prisoner Crockford then took her to a house and offered the land lady sixpence, but she turned both of them away. The prisoners then took her into Lamb's-fields, a distance of about two miles, where there were some empty houses; the prisoner Crockford then threw witness down, and Reed stood by laughing. (The witness here detailed the particulars of the assault, which are unfit for publication.) A man came up and saw what Crockford did ; he knocked Crockford down. Witness was crying and asked the man to take her home to her mother, but he refused, and said he had other business to attend to. She told her mother a few days afterwards what had happened, and she took her to the hospital, where she was examined by a doctor. On her cross-examination by Mr. C. Phillips, the wit ness contradicted herself in repeated instances, and made several admissions which proved that although so young improprieties of the grossest description had taken place between her. and son►c boys in the neighbourhood. Mr. James Lake, a surgeon, stated, he examined the person of the prosecutrix. The appearances that he found might have been occasioned by natural causes, or by violence. Mr. Baron VA tic HAW here observed, that it was im portant to society that infants of the tender age of the prosecutrix should be protected from the attacks of any worthless ruffian who might commit an assault upon them ; but in this case he doubted whether the evi dence of the prosecutrix was so far entitled to credit as to warrant the Jury in convicting the prisoners. The Jury must be satisfied that the offence with which the male prisoner stood charged had been completed. If they were, the consent of the prosecutrix, suppos ing it had been given, went for nothing, she being under ten years of age. Perhaps, however, they had better hear another witness. Sarah Small, the mother of the child, was then ex amined. She stated that the prosecutrix was ten years of age on the 24th of May. On the day named is the indictment • she came' home, but did not complain of anything having happened to her ; but a week after, in consequence of some suspicions, witness examined her person, and she questioned her as to what had hap pened,' when the told her that a man named Jem had done it. Witness took her to a doctor's, and on their return the prisonet was standing at his door, and the prosecutrix then pointed him out as the man who had ill-titled her. Witness ' told him what the prosecutrix had stated, and asked him why he had ill-used her child, and he said he would speak to her about it, and he followed her into her house, and he then begged she would say nothing about it. They then went out and drank together, and the prisoner slipped a rag into her hand ; she opened it when she got home, and found it contained five sovereigns. The prisoner's wife then came and pleaded very hard for him, and a feeling for her sex induced witness to promise not to prosecute. She took the money innocently and not for gain. She kept it three days and then sent for a police officer, who ' , took the male prisoner into custody. The prisoner after wards gave her five sovereigns more. The policeman compelled her to prosecute. Cross-examined.—She did not tell the policeman that he might get money too. She supped and drank with the male prisoner, after making the charge against him. After the male prisoner gave her the second five sove reigns, they went to the play together. Never said the prosecutrix had admitted the male prisoner was not the man who ill-treated her. Witness put her mark to a paper at the hospital. The paper was here put in and read. It ran as follows :—" Mrs. Small declares that Mr. Crockford was not the man who ruined her daughter, as she has ad mitted in her own words." Mr. Baron VA crania/ here said, after this evidence, the prosecution could not be entertained for another mo ment. It was clear there had been something wrong on the part of the male prisoner, from which a verdict of acquittal would not clear his character. However profli gate and abandoned the conduct of the prosecutrix, yet the law threw its protecting shield over infants of her tender age, and would not suffer her to consent to such an offence as that charged against the prisoner. Many of the answers given by the prosecutrix, showed not only that she had no regard for the obligation of an oath, but were evidently meant to deceive and mislead the jury. The evidence of both mother and daughter was so scan dalous and infamous that no reliance could be placed on it; and, under those circumstances, the jury would do best to acquit the prisoners. The jury accordingly re turned a verdict of Not Guilty. Mr. C. PHILLIPS said, now that the case is over, allow me to remark that the male prisoner has not been heard in his defence, and to say that, according to my instructions, he has a complete answer to the charge. I may also add that the parish have not taken up this pro secution, as all respectable parishes do in cases of this description, where they think the evidence can be relied on. I shall advise him to indict the parties for conspiracy. Mr. Baron VA con AN—lf you feel that you ought to do so, and that for the justice of the country a prose cution ought to be instituted, I hope it will be done ; but I think that the less stir the prisoner makes the better ; I cannot overlook the fact of his having paid money to to these parties. 1 Mr. Broughton, the magistrate who committed the prisoner, whispered something to the learned Judge. Mr. Baron VA UG HAN—I understand from the worthy magistrate sitting by me that there was not time between the prisoner's commitment and the breaking up of the Grand Jury, for the parish to make up their minds upon the subject, and I trust, therefore, it will not go forth to the public that they refused to prosecute. Robert Durley was convicted of stealing a silver wine cooler, value 92/. from the dwelling house of Mr. Solo mons, a jeweller, in the Strand. Waddington, the officer, applied to the Court to have the property given up to him until the reward offered byMr. Solomon. had been paid. The Court refused to interfere. NEW COURT. Thomas Brows, aged 35, and John Crawley, aged 18, were capitally indicted for maliciously and unlawfully assaulting and stabbing John Childs, with intent to murder him. There were other counts, charging with intent to maim, do him bodily harm, &c. John Childs lives at No. 34, Great Sutton-street, Clerk en well ; was crossing Smithfield, in company with a person named Marlbrough, on the 23d of April, when he saw the two prisoners following a youth with a box, whom he supposed they intended to rob, and therefore he watched them some time ; when they came to the corner of Hosier-lane, Marlbrough left him, and the prisoner Brown came up to him and in abusive language demanded to know who the cove was that had just left him. He told them he was a nailor. They then went on, but on his coming to Smithfield-bars the prisoners were wait ing; and Crawley struck him two violent blows, and while he was in the act of picking up his hat Brown struck him on the cheek with the point of an umbrella, which penetrated through into his mouth. Several eye witnesses to the whole transaction corro borated the testimony of the prosecutor. Messrs. Bullock and Burnaby conducted the case for the prosecution, and Mr. Phillips for the defence. The Common-Sergeant summed up, and the jury im mediately returned a verdict of Guilty—Death. SINGuLAn DEFENCE.—Jane Lovell, a respectable looking widow, aged 30, who appeared at the bar with a child in her arms, stood indicted for stealing a watch and other articles rom the person of William Later. The prosecutor deposed that he met the prisoner near the London-fields, in the Hackney-road, on the 12th of May, when he was induced to accompany her to an empty house of his own, near the spot. Previous to this adjournment they went to several public houses. He had been drinking all day, and was rather tipsy in con sequence. He knew at the time where the prisoner lived, but he denied that he had ever treated her before the night in question ; whether he behaved himself in an indecent manner towards the woman be could not say. After they took up their abode in the empty house he fell asleep, and when he bad aroused from his slumbers, he found that his companion had left him, and had taken the watch away also. The prisoner, when called upon for her defence, deli vered in a paper, of which the following is a true copy Nly Lord and Gentlemen of the Jury. I begg par don for intruden on your time that is so very preshous. My prosecutor first accosted me by the Cat and Mutton. I did not speak to him until he had accosted me the second time, and then not until some time, as he was not goen the same way I was pen. He afterwards crossed the feels and met me agane, and axed me to have summut to drink, which I did out of two pints of hale and a quer ton of gin. I then bid him good night. My prosecutor then took me by the hand, and said he was well aware I was not wanted at home so sone, and he would not let me go until I had been to some more public houses to have more drink. My prosecutor then said that there was a curcua at Hackney, and he took me there, and said if I went he would give me summut to my ad vantage. I went, and he had no money, but gave me his watch, and said he would fetch it and pay me as he knew ithe address. He said he had married a girl of the town, and she bad committed many depredations and had always got throw them. We had 2 moor glasses of rum and water. He was very tipsey that evening. My Lord and Gentlemen, I leave myself intirely to your mercy. " JANE LOVELL. The Learned Judge summed up the evidence,—and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty.—The Court observed that they would take time to consider the sentence. SETTLING FOR THE DERBY AND OAKS. This important finale to the Epsom Races took place yesterday a, Tatterasn's ; and although money came into the market slowly, the settlement is considered to have been tolerably harmless; the books were certainly less heavy than we have known on former ma. alone, and this will account for their adjustment having been et. fated with so little excitement or unpleasantness. We have no. thing to add to the list of winners and losers given in the accounts of the races, except that one of the latter class had not been able to find his way to Hyde.park-eorner. The party alluded to is from Birmingham ; his deficit is not ray extensive, and does not oee, ‘ sion any serious inconvenience. The customary regulations wer adopted to facilitate the settlement, tables and ch a i rs being piaceeet in the yard, and the doors closed to all but subscribers and those who paid a sovereign for admittance. The latter precaution had the effect of keeping out improper characters, many of whom were on the outside, on the lookout. The heaviest losers are the Bit mingham, Manchester, and Yorkshire Gentlemen, who bad backed " Brownian" to a very large amount; Indeed, so severely were they bit, that it was prognosticated that some of them muld not possibly show on settling - day. The Brummagem lose so much that a new copper oge would scarcely put them " r i ght in Court." The spirit with which this horse was backed partook of infatuation. The Scots declared they never bad such a Derby nag, and gave weight to their opinion by laying out large sums of money upon him. If they were right in their judgment, what must those be that beat him, and, more especially, what must Priam bey' And what will become of the St. beget y Th e Yorkshire issue was another proof of mistaken judgment, and did not assist in helping:the North-country folk out of the scrape they fell into on the Derby. The Chifneys evinced extraordinary abi. lily in the management of their horse, and not less straight.for. wardness in the manner with which they supported him in the bet. ting. They backed him at all odds, and declared openly that they knew him to be the best Derby hone that had ever come into their stable. Mr. Ridsdale formed a pretty correct judgment of his little nag. He M decidedly ate of the compactest things for his size that has been seen and ran with remarkable courage. There w as on l y one too many in the race. Lord Exeter's horses ran just as the party expected, as fu as concerned themselves, but did not quite come up to what was anticipated of their running against Priam . With the exception of the horses above spoken of, the favourites for the Derby and Oaks completely disappointed public ex p ects . don. The Derby betting was singularly favourable to those ad o make books. The Mummer ' Augustus, Priam, Captain A rt h ur, Little Red Rover, Mouse, Sir Harry Beagle, and Brunswicker, having severally been at seven and eight to one, three or four at ten to one, several at from twelve to 16 to one, and plenty at 20 and 21 to one, with constant fluctuations. The Oaks betting was had at the commencement, but got much more profitable towards the last month or two. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. HATTON GARDEN. INFORMATION REJECTED.—HaII, who was the lest witness of M•Leod. the fag at this Office, made an attempt, yesterday, to keep up the connexion in the neighbourhood under the nominatio:: of Hutchins. a very aged informer. The landlady of the Chapel-house, Chapel-street, Pentonvilk. was charged, at the instance of Hutchins, on the veracity of the eel. dente of Hall. The grave charge was for illegally suffering do. game of dominoes. Hall deposed to the act having taken place or the night named in the information, in the parlour of the deter. dent's house, where parties played for several pinta of beer. He amazingly minute in his circumstantial details, and very positive it 'his particulars. The defendant denied the accusation, and raid she had been di,. appointed of witnesses to swear to what took place on that identical evening. She did not at any time permit gambling in her house, nor keep the means of gambling for any of her customers. She had been out of the way several hours on the evening named, and if such was the case, which she did not believe, that dominoes had been played, they must have been smuggled into the house without her knowledge, and carefully concealed. She could give the best ferenees as to the general character of her house. Two or three officers belonging to the establishment stepped for. ward, and each declared that they knew the house intimately, and that they never by any chance saw the slightest sign of these prac tices; but, on the contrary, that they had always found it conducted most scrupulously correct as to the regulations, and it was univa. sally respected in the neighbourhood. The Magistrates held a short consultation in an under tone, eut. ing repeated glances at the witness, who appeared not to be com fortable under the casual scrutiny of :the beach , and a ft er a few minutes the case was dismissed abruptly. QUEEN SQUARE. Yesterday Covington and hoes, beadles of the Grosvenor-place district, Pimlico, applied to Mr. %Purrs for a summons against Mr. Webb, a broker in Ebury.street, for suffering his dog Ito go at large about the streets after notice had been given to the inhabitants to confine their dogs. Jones stated, that about eight o'clock on the previous evening he was in Ebury.atreet, Mr. Virebb's dog was at large and flew at him, but he fortunately best bhn of with his stick. He then spoke to ' Mr. Webb and remonstrated with him, and begged he would tie his dog up, or he should be compelled to summons him before a magistrate, as they had received strict orders from the Trustees to clear the streets. Mr. Webb replied he should do no such thing, nor did he care for any orders the Trustees might issue. Mr. Wattle immediately granted a summons. Jones said, several other persons, whose dogs were about t h e streets, had, on being spoken to, immediately confined the ant. male ; and he had orders from Mr. Boodle, the secretary, not to proceed against them. Mr. Webb was the only person who hat refused. BIRTHS. At Sunville, the lady of 7.iirsinutt, Esq. of a daughter—lr. Merrion.square, Dublin, the lady of Sir G. G. Aylmer, But. of a son and heir—At Julian's.town Glebe, near DroghWa, the lady of the Rev. W. Vandeleur, of a daughter—ln Dublin, the lady of tha Rev. W. Batty, of a son—The lady of W. Hawkesloy, E r g. of a daughter—At oowran, the lady of the Rev. Dr. Staples, of a tin —At Ardee, the lady of Capt. J. Clarke, 76th refit. of a son. MARRIED. On Monday, at boughtll Church, by the Rev. W. Waller, and afterwards at Mount 'rrenehard, the seat of S. E. Rice, Esq. W. OriSo, Esq. M.D. to Louisa, eldest daughter of J. Hunt, Esq. of Mantle-hill, Limerick—At Bunratty, ?Ir. AL Hasactt, of Doonbeg, to Sarah, daughter of the late G. O'Donnell, of Clon. money, Esq.—ln Dublin, J. Dillon, Esq. of Ellis's-quay, to Nitta Emily, sister of the Rev. T. Surridge, New Ross--At New-inn Church, T. T. Magrath, Esq. to Rebecca, second daughter of W. Upton, of Cashel, Esq.—The Rev. G. B. Nloore, perpetual Cu rate of Ardent, to Mary Anne, youngest daughter of the late D. Crawford, of Spamount, county Donegal, Esq.—At H. C. Donellan, Esq. of Hdhwood, county Galway, to Anne Jane, only daughter of the late M. Damian, Esq. M.D. of For. tumna. DIED. At Killaloe, at the advanced age of tlB, Mr. E. Leo—ln Done relic, aged 82, very much regretted, Mrs. Hill, relict of the late A. Hill, Esq.—ln Anne-street, Cork, Mr. T. Townsend—Suddenly, Mr. R. Fitzgerald, of Moss-street, Dublin—ln Capel-street, nu. sums, relict of the late J. W. Carroll, of Arran quay, Esq.—At Holywell, D. 111'Sweeney, Esq.—Anna, daughter of R. Hughes, of °away, Esq.—At Killincoole Glebe, Louth, J. William, son of the Rev. Joseph Wright. COURSE OF R) Amsterdam ...12 8 CF. Ditto at sight ...12 7 Rotterdam... 2 U 12 8 Antwerp ... 12 8 Hamburgh Sog U 14 2 Altuna ... $ U 14 111 Paris, 3day'sslght 25 75 Ditto ...2 U 26 0 Madrid Cadia ...36; Barcelona —3sl Bilboa :CHANGE, June 2. Seville ...353 Gibraltar .. 473 Leghorn ... 473 Genoa ... 86 Venice ...473 Malta Naples Palermo .. ... 118 d per os Lisbon Rio Janeiro .. 211 Dublin Cork . PRICES OF OOLD AND SILVER. Foreign Gold in Bars Silver, in Bars, standard ... Al 17 4 ... • 4 11 PRICE OF LEATHER. Best Dressing Hides Common Ditto Crop Hides, to 401bs for cutting l4d to lid Ditto 45 to 501bs 164 to 18d Calf Skins, 56 to 401bs Ditto 50 to 701bs Ditto 70 to Nibs ... .. Small Seals, Greenland) ..... Spanish Horse Hides .... ..... Tanned Horse Hides ... ... H GH- w A TYR at LONDON-BRIDGZ TO -MORROW Morning • edema after Mumma • 2 mama agar Limn, t Primed aad IPabibied by Join Wm, at dos 157444- Orioles Mk ridma l pkwihTegiple Bar. '' \ \ UT th ha