Star. — London, England, 1827-08-03 00:00:00

sons have remained off the course in consequence: A man named Wright was so kept off two years ago.— Wright is an inhabitant of Ne• market. —.Greville,Esq —Knows M t.H twkins.the defendant; has seen him nn the heath on the day on which the race was run by" Monody." Mr. Hawkins was on horse back, and near Lord Wherncliffe's carriage. It was on Wednesday, the 18th of April. Saw Mr. Hawkins ride about for mitre time before he came ap to Lord Wharn cliffe's carriage. There is no high road upon the heath. Saw Mr. Hawkins on the heath half an hour after he had come tip to Lord Wharncliffe's carriage. Cross-examined by Mr.Rostsson—Part of the heath is called the Flat. Witness is not aware of the bone. daries which separate two parishes, in which the heatbi is situated. Knows the heath for 16 years. Is a member of the Jockey Club, but is'quite ignorant what rights ha may have io that character to the lands in question; had once a share, but sold it; is not a trustee of the Jockey Club ; and is not aware of the terms upon which the Duke of Portland holds the land under the Club.i During every season in which the Duke has been tenant he has never put the slightest obstacle in the way of the races ; believes Mr. Weatherby manages the race ground. Mr. Wm. Weatherby is one of the solicitors for the plaintiff; saw Mr. Hawkins upon a part of the heath called the Flat several times on the 20th of April last; it was in that part of the Flat which is in the parish of Burwell. Witness asked Mr. Hawkins for the name of his attorney ? Mr. Hawkins said he would let witness know in a week or two. Mr. Weatherby, son. has been for several years solici tor to the Jockey Club; let the course to the Duke of Portland from Christmas, 1823 ; the letting was by parole; and there was no reservation whatever of any rights for the Jockey Club: the rent was 1181. and it was let from year to year; the land is not is the parish of Newmatket, but is a most important part of what is called Newmarket Heath; persons have been com pelled to remain off the heath; three actions have.been brought for trespass ; damages have been recovered against one defendant, and the other two submitted; has known the heath for a great many years. Is the agent and treasurer of the club. Is the keeper of the match-book, and publisher of the Racing Caka dar. The races are published in the Calendar, and by lists published at Newmarket about a week beforehand. Daring the races all persons present go backward and forward as they please upon that part of the heath on which the trespass has been said to have been cow. sniued. This has been the case for half a century. Reaexanoined—When witness said that the people went up and down as they pleased, he meant it with the exception that thee had not received any notice to go off the ground.—This was the case for the plaintiff. Mr. Bowsaws,. before addressing the Jury for the defence, submitted to the Court that the plaintiff ought to be nonsuited, upon the ground of a variance between the declaration and the evidence.—The objection was over-ruled, and Mr. Roarsutos proceeded to address the Jury for the defence, and contended. that the fact of the Jockey Club having always advertised their races. and invited the public to attend to them, did of itself constitute a license to all persons who should think proper to at toad the races, to go upon every part of the course, and to pass without restriction wherever their inclinations might lead them. The Lotto CHIRT BARON then proceeded to charge the Jury, which was special and highly respectable. In, reference to the plea of the defendant (the 4th in order) l that the public had a right to be present when certain lawful racesfor lawful stakes are run upon the heath, his Lordship declared that it was a species of right of which he had never heard, nor did he think that the mere fact of the Jockey Club having suffered the public to be present at the races on their ground, gave all mankind a tight to come there whenever a race was to be run. The Jury, after a short consultation, having inquired what amount of damages would carry costs, returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages Is. CHELMSFORD, Auayse i. The Auizes for this county commenced yesterday, before the Hon. Mr. Justice Parma on the Crown side, and the Hon. Mr. Justice GAUL= on the Civil Side. In both Courts the business is considerable. Thomas Johnson was indicted for uttering with a guilty knowledge, to Richard Bush, a forged Si. Bank of England note. The prosecutor, a labouring man, had sold a horse to the prisoner at Romford market, and received in psyment the note in question, on the 11th of The note was paid at the King's Arms public-house, and the prisoner told the landlord not td say he knew soy thing of him in case he should be asked about him. The prisoner rode off in a great hurry. Soon after . wards the note was ascertained to be forged, and nest day the prisoner was discovered at a public-house on Cambridge Heath. The ptisoner attempted to make his escape by climbing a garden wall ten feet high. The prisoner denied all knowledge that the note was forged. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty, and sentence of Death was pronounced upon hint.—Though a young wan, he has been in trouble before for uttering base money. Joseph Perry was indicted, under Lord Ellenbo rough's Act, for shooting at Joseph Parish, at Margaret ting, on the 9th of July. with a loaded pistol, with in tent to murder or do him some grievous bodily harm. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty, and sentence of Death was recorded. YORK, JuLy 51. Cam lkoz.—(l3efore Mr. Justice Beer tr.) DOLBY AND WISP AGAINST SHAW. Mr. Poit.oca stated that this action was brought by Mr. Mark Dolby, and Penelope, his wife, formerly Miss Penelope Staveley, of Driffield, in the East Riding of Yorkshire, to recover from the defendant, Mr. Jonathan Shaw, of Driffield, cornfactor, who had paid his ad dresses to Miss Staveley, before her marriage, the sum of 1401. which she had deposited in his hands. When the Jury had heard the circumstances, they wruld think that the defendant had not much regard for his charac ter in defending this action, for the defence intended to be made would certainly reflect very little honour upon him. The defendant, at the close of last year, was pay ing his addresses to Miss Staveley, and it was not an unlikely thing that she should deposit a sum of money with the man she expected would become her husband; but they afterwards quarrelled and broke off the match, and then the defendant denied that he had ever re ceived any thing from Miss Staveley, and now thinks he can protect himself from the present action because the money was deposited in his hands by Miss Staveley, when no one else was present. -It would, however, be proved teat Miss Staveley received a sum of 1501. on the 23d of last November, 1001. in a bill of • r exchange, and the remainder in country notes, and that a day or two afterwards, whilst the de fendant was an the parlour of her house. she went upstairs to her room, and took out the 1001. bill, and carried it into the parlour. As the defendant and she were then alone, there was no evidence •to prove that she gave him the bill, but it would be shewn that he, the following morning, took it to the bank and received money for it. If the parties had even had commercial dealings with each other, it might be presumed that the bill was given in payment of a debt or for value, but that supposition was excluded by the situation of the parties, and also by the conduct of the defendant, when he was afterwards called upon for the money ; for upon the application of the defendant's attorney, the de fendant, supposing GOD was the only witness that the bill had been put into his hands, denied not only all knowledge of it, but also all knowledge of the concerns of Miss Staveley. It would, however, appear from his letters, two of which would be produced, that the de. Pendant had been ft eq uently consulted by Miss Staveley upon her affairs, and had given her advice upon them. The letters were peculiar—the first was dated the Bth of December, 1826, in which the defendant, after stating that he had been ill, and was afraid it would be a week before he could venture out to see her, writes, "I have received a letter from my brother Isaac at Wakefield, who advises you to end your dispute with your brothers. He thinks you had better take 1,8001. and the furniture, and that, with the 1501. you have got, will make alto• gether nearly 2,1001. which he thinks better for you than going to law. I should like to see you to have some personal conversation about it, but I dare not venture out. You must not make an offer in writing, because it will do away with the written agreement altogether. When you make the proposal, it must be to your brother Richard personally, when you and he are alone, and no witness is by." The Jury would observe, that ;the de fendant now acted upon the same plan in which he had cautioned Miss Staveley to act towards ber brothers. The second letter, although not quite so material, was still important. It was written a few days afterwards, on the 13th of December, and in it the defendant ad. wised Miss Staveley to go to Mr. Leeson, at Beverley, and get him to write to her two brothers, threatening to file a bill against them, if they did not come to an ar rangement ; and concluded with recommending her not to tell any one, not even Mr. lesson, that she would take £l,BOO. The man who wrote these letters had the face to deny, after the intended match was broken off s all knowledge of the Lady's affairs. The 1001. bill got into Miss Staveley's hands on the 23d of November, as part of the 1501. mentioned in the first letter, and two mornings afterwards the defendant paid it into the bank. Forty pounds in notes were also advanced with the bill to the defendant, but they unfortunately could not be traced, and it was to be feared that they could not be recovered. Robert Dandy, agent to the East Riding Bank, prow. ed that the defendant dealt with the bank, and •on the 26th of November last paid in a bill for 1001. dated the 7th of October, at two months. The defendant al -1 doped the bill ; be had credit for it; it was paid in due course. was not a needy man. The plaintiff's witness, Dandy. had proved his respectability, and that he could havel got accommodated for twiny hundred pounds at the bank, without being put tothe necessity of cheating the Lady of one hundred pounds, for the charge made against him was worse than pocket-picking. The bill was its own title-deed, the fact of its being in his pos• session proved the defen "ant's right to it until it was shewn such possession was tortuous. and that nn con sideration was given for it. The plaintiffs had not attempted to sheer this, as it was their duty to halt j done; for the presumption of the law was, that gooM consideration had been given for the bill, and thin, presumption had nut been disproved. Two letters, had indeed been produced, the one was said to bit very material, the other not quite so much so; bat notwithstanding this, the second letter was quite as important as the first t it was a very ill-used letter, and had certainly great teason to complain of the plaintiffs Counsel. Bosh the letters, in fact, contained much pru dent advice, but they neither of them had any thing ' to do with the cause. When lovers quarrel, they oat unfrequently became haters ' • the Lady is apt to rj a enraged, and what a furious Lady can do is well knowei and has been powerfully described. This Lady, how. ever, knew better—she did not break her heart—she knew it was safer far to wed than burn, and she very prudently made a second choice. With this there was no reason to find fault, but the defendant had great cause to complain of the present attempt; and if, after the strong presumption in his favour, the Jury were to give credit to the plaintiff's case, no man would here after be safe in accommodating a Lady or any body else, by cashing a bill, without having a Notary present to witness the transaction. Mr. Justice Bat:Lee—This is either on the one hag/ a very dishonest action, or on the other hand a very dishonest defence : on one side there must be gross dishonesty. The parties who know what passes in their own minds can tell on whom the imputation ought to fall : we, without that assistance, must look to the facts that have been proved—we must weifb the prep babilities, and form our 'conclusion. There is no doubt that the bill passed from Miss Staveley to the delend. ant, and that be has had the benefit of it. In general, where a bill is passed from one person to another, the presumption is, that value was given for it, unless the contrary is shewn ; and, therefore, if this were sa l ordinary transaction, the presumption would be that the defendant bad given value; but when the intimacy of the parties, and the connexion that was likely to take place between them, together with the evidence of Mr. Jennings, were taken into consideration, the Jury had to decide whether the presumption were mot rebutted. What would have been the answer to Jets-, nings's inquiries of a man who bad given value for the' bill? Would he not have said- 8 4 What does she mean by sending such a message, when she must know I gave her money for the bill?' Although it would be dangerous in ordinary cases not to act upon the pre sumption that the bolder bad given 'value, yet the Jury were to consider whether this was not so extraordinary a case as to justify them in judging that presumption to be rebutted by the situation of the parties, and the evidence of Jennings ? Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, lea Cross-examined—The defendant was in a respectable line of business, and kept a good account; he was in the habit of drawing out 4004 and 5001. a week; he some times overdrew his account ; we would let him do so to-the amount of 6001. or 7001. Re-examined—The defendant did not draw oat any GUILDHALL. money when he paid in the bill. He is about thirty- ireseirda.l b ran souk 1 $ yeses old , was 4617110 bike. Me ' Alderman Ong a highwa robbery preview sight. `three or thirty-four. Mr. V. Jones at th A rm s, Henerbae The two letters were then put in and tead. Market, stated, that he was rat from Winton ahem eleven Richard Jennings, the plaintiff's attorney—l received o'clock, and bad jut turned into the Market from Milkureet, horn Moses Walker 1501. in November last for Miss when he was knocked down by a blow in the face. He felt Me 'Btaveley ; 1001. was in a bill, and 501. in country notes. w h atch b i eil l dca : n e e w u a e , c y;, end das bald hold of tb : ing ribi " , which end seal; but i 1 gave it to Miss Staveley on the afternoon of the 2sd by the ribbon with the watch, and whirl gave way. Mesas& was of November. In the beginning of March I went to so unexpected, and the blow so stunning, that be made no awn the defendant to demand payment of 1401. he owed to Lion of the Palma who robbed him. Miss Staveley. The defendant said he had nothing of whit:nit= watchman,an and saw standing t ,,.. 14 his hex in running,the Mark wham et, hers. I stated to him that she had informed me that mised • Ile perceived him thro sa w w wi r thth . T; wa y 0,,, drag she Isad given him the 1001. bill, and a week or ten days him to the spot where the snide fell, found the eomplekissn's afterwards bad lent him 401. out of the 501. He. said watch. Mr. James nose and upper *bore proofs of the severity he knew nothing at all of the matter. I said it was Gr l i ts e e att priso ack ;er, in his defame, add. that when the a ts liter singular she should have invented such a story; and I daier w. raised, two men were running before himic",thel, gamed asked him if be had cashed the bill for her? He said, the watchman; but when he (the ptisonet) came up, he seined no; he knew nothing about it. I said, 6 ' You must him, and picking up a watch, charged him with having thrown fe have known of her receiving 150/." He said, no ;he away.--The LI watchman, c in reply toquestio i n n s u from the Magistrate, away, the watch. and t rhaa p aa so p a r er t h r e e had posed tes him be h fo r sie be th t e tuiez . did not—how should he know any thing of her concerns? Cross-examined—Miss Staveley's marriage with Mr. saner for at least 15 mutes. Dolby took place about three weeks afterwards. The Mr. Alderman TNOMPIDOW warned the prisoner, that his life was defendant was very civil to me when I called npon him, in „ l jel a t t h d e n g e nt r ; of ile ß l e i rck been , witta cka an g a t s d ni,l7, fcve und:r im p °I2 l ut o r nda cil , and wanted to employ me about business of his own. elan:stances, and be then dismissed him wit h a caution which he Moses Walker identified the bill of exchange, which was sorry to find had produced no effect upon his mind. he, on the 15th of November, paid over to Mr. Jennings TM prisoner was Ikea committed. for Miss Staveley. BOW-STREET. w thli th A r r a ty a we: at brought a from St. Cie- Sophia Pearcey, niece to Mrs. Dalby, saw her aunt met watch-ho u se, c rank in frao receive the bill and notes from Mr. Jennings. The next coach. It appeared that the coach had been hind by defendant day, at about seven or eight in the evening, witness and three other Officers from a coffee-house in the Haymarket, and lighted her aunt up stair s, where her aunt got the bill, when it stopped at the corner of Catherine-street the driver missed Wad took it down into the room where the defendant t v h o e n platoePahand ase applying t a t i o wd th h e fir i lt ed wh h r a alighted , he h h e ia r e eeeived a and was, and witness never saw the bill any more. The woth ey ed off, fell Owed by the third, leaving defendant to slut she defendant and her aunt were then on very good terms; difference. A man who bad picked up one of the plates, which he used to come often to the house, and witness under- be had seen thrown from the coed:, then brae& it forward. —The defendant treated the matter cavalierly, and mewed any stood they were to be shortly married. compensation. He was therefore taken to the madhouse. In Cross-examined—They ceased to be on good terms defence, he denied all knowledge of the transaction, and said that about Chi istmat. he had that morning waited on his friends, who were men of amulet Mr. POLLOCK proposed to prove what Miss Staveley honour, and they denied all knowledge of the circumstance. Ai* said to her niece about the bill she had given to the much altercation, however, be agreed to make poor Jarvis a caw defendant ; but, as the defendant was not then present, Pe na wit and was HA disch I VTIN.OARDEN: Mr. Justice BAYLRY advised hint not to press the evi- A man named Tat t ler, and a woman named Dooms, with whop dente. he cohabited, were brought to Hatton Garden /Wise elm ep The bill was then put in and read. There was no Wednesday night, ia the custody of Hatt, the revalki watch.. endorsement between Moses Walker and the defendant's house ke :r u r t ; d f ic allaw er ad . :r y A g le a s e l oo ts . °W Pai=gost,lllll by Mn endorsement. eras, with starving and cruelly treating a yessegaidlikkimed James Mr. BROUGHAM remarked that his friend had to en- Tayier, between three and four years of sir, the offspring of the male prieoner. counter gt eat labour in stating his case, from which the The child was carried to the oMce by Mr. Wolfe, and won Jury might easily divine it was a very difficult one to .hewn to Mr. Sergeant Smon, the presiding Magistrate. Its ap. . state. Indeed, a stranger hearing the statement would Profane' was most frightful In figure It was not as large as a baby of men months. On different parts of its body were marks of have judged it to have been any thing else than an action harrnaent fled r i o t , : a lidttle wasts them It were ld idso cut, u i from a for money had and received ; for his friend had charged Meier. UM or rope aa d v is i c n o g rdant sounds to announce its wants. met speak , t made the defendant with having very little honour, very little hos e,ty. and still less gallantry. What gallantry bad Mr. Wolffe stated, that some months since the prisoners, who lived as man and wife, came to ledge at No. 1„ urfehters-striret, to do in an action for money bad and received he (Mr. oppo eas the un, which was easels , opposite ; to hone of a man named !eve Brougham) did not know but his friend did not merely in house. The apartment they occup ied was the hoot kitche n. impute to the defendant want of gallantry, but also They were in the habit of going out I n morning, and not re want of honesty ; he did not merely impute to him that turning until very late at night. Upon many occasions some of the he was not a knight•ertant who would run all hazards, children and women in the nei g hbourhood heard erks and screams and sacrifice ease, safety, and life itself on behalf of a bwtnilvfeduunint,hhe kitchen,, a s if from an infest in db.". A wee". Csidwell, rf t thinking a that t the t Lady, but he imputed to him that he only sought after cries must have e p ga r at oc e eed o ed uir 4o ss m m h ed ue her cash, put his hand into her strong box, and pulled bread under the door, which, for somege hunger, f re q uen tly iro p uld tave the out one hundred pounds in monies numbered. The fact effect of stopping the can. The infant was, however, never seen, at was, however, otherwise ; the Lady was disappointed, it was never brought out to take the a ir, and every thing r'espectin h t was was mere cont conjecture. because the Gentleman would not marry her, and so ragotae. On e of his glimpseofi (Mtanr;iwta. s) dau g hters , account she gave hint she sent to him a very skilful attorney, to pump him foe of it was so frightful, that he determined upon taking nent evidence to maintain this action. It is said that it is means to see ft, and adopting the course he that day did, if the re more easy to make an empty ba g stand upright, than presentation made to hint w as cor r ect . H e accor di ng ly had the th wo a m m an aa ta w k ha en a in h t r o a custod y aalrt by i t a w l,: s re t et-keeper l , c and di srned tla:thethalikehlydr to make a poor man withstand temptation and be n be honest; but the defendant was not an empty bag,—be was not the offtprit,g of both the parties, but of the man's by a kr. POLICE INTELLIGENCE: mei Wife., fie sent for a medical Gentleman, nailed Wilford, of jedd.etreet,who examined the child, and said, that although te e child .eras In a declining state, yet there were marks upon the b e d, that did not proceed from any malady, hot were the marks vetie chastiseelect—the marks of a rope being quite percepnble sa different parts of the body. A number of witnesses here came forward who bore out all th e facts stated by Mr. Wolfe. Amongst others, Mrs. Caldwell, wbe deposed to the *OK piteous cries haring issued from the kitches, to tonseqtreme of which she frequently put victuals under the dp i and saw at infant crawl and eat it. The woman in her defence said„ that she always treated the chat with as much kindness as if it had been her own. Mr. fewest Ihnt.oar, io remanding the prtvontet, said t a u mach cheeks were din to Mr. %We, for his exertions ill the cue. The prisoners were then takes from the bar, and conveyed W private way to the New Prison, to sate them from the fndignaWm of the assemblage of people that crowded round the office door 1111: di • late boar ms Wednesday night. The child was given to the care of Mr. Wolk, who covered it boom, bad it narked, and avail necessary cut Ulna of it. MARLIIOROUGH-STRKET. y ettee d ay Ad is Ares, a young fellow Who was is custody I her days ago epee seepicios of being coseerned in the robbery a m t , Horace Twits, bat who was then discharged from warn of seldom*, was yester d a y placed at that bat of this once. charged *lrk robbing a Gentleman's footman of his watch sad appendages, near the very spot where the forester robbery was committed. The cranial/ sat stated that he was stabdiag at the end of Geary. street, formerly Dyot-etreet, St. Giles's, the preceding mato& is co with a female, when a man came behind hint mad stacked his watch from his fob. He could Dot swear the pelmet was the man that took it, but there was a witness present who vrw the watch in thk prisoner's ptissessioa. The witness alluded to by the law witness swore that be mw the eructs in the prisoner's hand, but he did not see him snatch ft fron t the person of the complsinant. Reardon, an dicer of St. Giles's, said that the prisoner was I nocotlous character, basing been committed several times, sad when be took Wm into custody, be found Ave boadkercbiefe on his person. Prisoner—How can you say that? You► know there was only three. Afaenewasa—mite swoosh for any moderate rm. The primmer was remanded for further exasnemee. UNION-HALL AMIN LIMINISCIN an Irishman was brought up in custody of two °dicers of the Mendicity Society, charged with begging. The Mfrs stated that the prisoner was watched going from boast to horse asking cheeky; be was in that capacity recognised as an of 4 Wender, having been freeform), relieved by the Mendietty soci et y, and mice paned by them to Ireland,Lawrence denied that ie was begging, or had been relieved by the Society in the minuet [ stated.—He was committed to Brixton for one ttlioth. A fellow named William Blear was brought up by the Parish OMeers of St. Saviour's, charged with neglecting his wife and dill. dren, whom he left to be emit ely supported by the Parish. It me proved that be was in work, and could earn from 50s. to Ms. pd week.—The Magistrate thought be ought to be mode an trample of, and accordingly committed Mtn to Brixton for one month. TOWN-HALL. A Mickey was charged with passing counterfeit cola to Mr. gale, a dealer in vegetables, in the Borough Market. The pt saner purchased foe, pennyworth of vegetables, for which he gnu him a bad shining, and received the change. Ina few sinus he returned, awl passed another bad &Jilin ; bat prosecutor sedge him shortly after In the fruit market, had MN apprehended, sod having In the space of seven days takes of El. in bad aim, be was determined to prow:ate. The ISSOD shad Bbe us sun it was the Noe tan? Prossamir umuound hies Also tiro ; ivbeis the prisoner, with the 6110411 utbsissi. 11 1601 . 1 Ns Ihr—l never saw you before !" He was des resunial the &Acker of the Mint can attend. It the county of Worcester there is an excellent hitof apples and pears; and, therefore, cider and perry may be reasonably expected to be both good and cheap. Yesterday morning, about eleven o'clock, a Gentle. man and Lady, fashionably attired, were proceeding along Piccadilly in a chaise, drawn by a young horse, apparently lately broken in for the harness, when the animal suddenly took fright, and ran with the great velocity. Turning . down the Haymarket, the wheel of the vehicle came in contact with that of a hackney coach, the latter of which upon the former, and pre& pitated the unfortunate young Lady several yards dii. taut from the chaise, by which she was so 'ninthly in. jored, that when taken up she was, to all appearances, dead ; but happily the assistance of Mr. Mahon, surgeon, ofJermyn-street, being procured, she was bled, and with some difficulty again brought to herself ; bat it is fear ed that a locked jaw will be the consequence. flu face was dreadfully disfigured. The Gentleman re. ceived some slight bruises, being thrown ender the hackney coach. The young Lady was conveyed to the house of a relative in Piccadilly. The horse was cwt stopped till it reached Charing.cross. A melancholy accident occurred at Glenlace, on the 20th current. Early in the morning, Mr. Thomas M'William, mason and architect, had gone to Gab snoot, to superintend the erecting of a new bridge on the line of road from Glenluce to New Luce. Some of the workmen complained that the frame-work was is and their master, with the view of strengthen• ing the fabric, ordered them to pot in additional props. immediateßat as no ; danger was feared, Mr. M' William entered the arch himself, and was voluntarily followed by three of his workmen. The three workmen forty !lately escaped, but their master, though he followed them pretty closely, was intercepted by the falling stones, killed on the spot, and buried in the ruins. De news of his death struck consternation into the village where be resided, and of which his forefathers had bees respectable inhabitants for the long period of 300 year. He has left a wife and seven children, as well is a mother, mother- ithlaw, and a number of workmen, who were in a great measure dependent on his exertions. ho man was more respected for sobriety, industry, and pro feniotsal skill, and no man ever better repaid the con• fidence which was placed in him by the county Gentle. men. He died at the age of 47.—Drrafries Courier. BIRTH. rare, the Lady of Major Mutes* Mmday,ls dadaugMw. MARRIED. Monday, at St. George's, Ilauover.aquare, Gunge (apple Nor. ton, Esq. M.P. to Caroline Saaabeth Sarah, second daughter of the late Thomas Sheridan, Esq. HIGH. v/ ATEA st LONDON-BRIDGE TO MORROW. Meru* 21 minutes We, 11 Afternoon 59 albums after 11 MAILS—THIS DAY. •RR. DUN. 1 4 Frame Watertod 1 0 Guainey and Jersey 0 0 Lisboa 0 0 Hamburg Flanders Secedes Doassiodire 0 0 Bums Ayres 0 1 HoUaoli i of Saila* Janata Mita Loom,: Prisood.aod roblitiol by Joao MAIMS, thr at lb, STAR Orr No. 1, klatattt-place, Tampa, Ter 1.44; 0 Viet o o 0 1 0 10 4111 o 0 AI it o 0 * tad o 0 Qv ' , vv. , 4) ii 4st Lia• DIED. Arr. 'ban Thomas, Vicar of Lantana% and Liandibilio.Geges Cardiposhlre. Drowned, is the POUNCIOSSI deer, South America, on the a Jane last, in the loth year of his age, Thomas Thomson, 31.1 nada* of Hamilton. lie and samba Gentleman, en a visit to a friend, were crossing the river in a cork], when about the middle of the stream, and opposite their friend's boom, the (eclat upset: the Doctor, trpsttng to his swimming, made for the shore, and bid reached within ten yards of it, when be sunk. He was a graduate of Glasgow University, where he distinguished biinseif in several of the dames, particularly In Mathematics and Chemistry. It went to Dmacnry nearly two years ago, where he practised tin his death. I i i .77A %roe. 1 1 , 4 011 II Paid Pr cam from ,a a. Oct* fio Oirp SOW OK Sew sews sad to. Li Oa 1 On] t.e`+i A F 4ow, On or* Tv," I 'hi 1