Star. — London, England, 1812-07-10 00:00:00

01Firer:06777 ' . ' } ~ ~ AMERICA •. oat CORRESFONDENCE LAID BEFORE CONG (Cunt Mut d.) erre.tcrt OV - A teT rest rum sta. RUSSELL TO TUN,. SIORE. TAILV ur STATE, DAI ED " Londrin, Jan. 14, 1812. " Lhave the honour ro acknowledge therrecei?t of your two letters of the With of November last.—lt. Would have offortit.d pie the highest satisfaction to hay: been able to communicate to you, by the return of the Hornet, the revocation of the Orders in Council : bither o, however, there has been exhibited here no disposition to repeal tht m " MI. RUSSELL TO MR. MONROE. •, . " London, Jan. 22, 1812. " Sic—Yesterday I•understead the case of the Female, one of the Vessels captured under the Orders in Council, came to trial before Sir Wm. Scott. He re j-c•ed a mutton for thee to produce evidence of th- revocation of the Berlin n 4 Milan Decrees in re felon to the United States, and suggested that there would•be a question of law, if such revocatian, when shewr, rioted be con sidered by the British Goveroment as sufficient to require the re peal of the Orders in Council. At any rata that he was bound to consider these orders to be in force until their repeal should be Notified to him by this GOvermilent. The Female was con demnetl.-1 have the honour; &e. (Signed)" JON A. aulsEtt." O a A LITTiII FROM MR. RUSSELL TO MC MONROE, 44 Dated London, Feb. S. 1812. " Since I had the honour to address you, I have received your s I ..cunimunication of the Q.Oth December, through the good ollices Of Mr. hotter. " While rlament thernecessity, is) n:ost sincerely do, of the course indicated by the proceedings of Congress; yet it is grad tying to learn that It will be pursued with vtgoer and unanimity. I am persuaded that this Government lies presumed' =ea on our weakness and divisions, and that it continues to believe that we have not energy and union enough to make -efficient war. " I have this moment learnt that the Hornet has returned from Cherbourg to Cswes, and I understand by a letter from the Con. sul - there, that there is a Mr. l'o•ter on board with dispatches from Mr. Barlow for this legation; but be has no: yet made his appearance here. I am obliged to close this letter without waiting for him, as I understand the next post may not arrive at Liver pool in season for the Orbit." VIET OE A Lyn ER 740$ MR. RUSSELL TO TES SECRETARY OE STATE, DATED " London, February 9, 11119. STI—I have the honour to transmit to you enclosed a copy Of a letter, dated x9th ult. front Mr. Barlow, and copy of the note M which I yesterday cummunicated that letter to the Mar quis Wellesley. " Nthotigh the proof of the revocation of the French Decrees contamed in the letter of Mr. Barlow, is, when taken by itself, of. no sei y conclusive character, yet it ought, when connected with that rreviously exhibited to this Government, to he ad mitted as satisfactorily establishing that 'revocation : and in this view i have ilumght it to be - my dui yto present it here. I have the honour to be, &c. &c. (Signed) " JONA. aussxxx." TO 1111 SENATE AND MOOSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OP THE UNITED STATES. transmit, fir the information of Congress, Conies of a Correspondence of the Mallbter Plenipotentiary of Great Bri t ms, witti the Secretary of State. `June 4, Ibl2. JAMES MADISON. MR. ROSTER TO MR. MONROE. Washington, May 30, 1812. Bit —Notwithstanding the discouraging nature of the conver • satiun which I had the honour to have with you a few days since at your office, and the circumstance of your continues] silence, In -regard to two letters from me, furnishing additional proof of the existent* of the I :etith Decrees; nevertheless, there does now appear such clear and convincing evidence in the Report of the • Duke of Bassano, dated the 10th of March of the present year, - of those I)ecrees having not only never been rescinded, but of their being recently extended and aggravated in the republication of then' contained In that instrument, that I cannot but imagine • It will seem most important to the President, that it should be communicated to Congress without delay, in the present tote ' resins crisis of their deliberations; and, therefore, hasten to i fulfil the instructions or my Government, in laying before the povernment of the United States, the enclosed 11fpuiteuri of the 16th of last March, in which is contained that Report , as it was i made to the Ruler of France, and communicated to the Con . 'creative Senate. This Report confirms, if any thing were wanting to confirm, in the most unequivocsl manner, the repeated assertions of Great Britain, that the Berlin and Milan Decrees have never been re voktd, however some partial and insidious relaxations of them may have been made in a few instances, as an encouragement to America to adopt a system beneficial to France and injurious to • Great Britain, while the conditions on which alone it has been declared, thai those Decrees Trill ever be revoked, are here ex plained and amplified in a manner to leave us no hope of Bona parte having any disposition to renounce the systeni 9f Injustice which he bas pursued, so as to make it possible for. Great Bri tain to give up the defeurave measures she has been obliged to resort to. I nerd not remind you, Sir, how often it has In vain been urged by Great Britain, that a copy of the instrument should be produced by which the Decrees of Bonaparte were said to be repealed; and how much It bas been desired that AMerica should mplieltly state, that she did Pot adopt the conditions on which the repeal was offered. If is own manitot that there was never more than a condi . timid offer of repeal made by Franie, which we had a right to complain that - America bhould have asked us to recognise as .74. ',lute, and which, if accepted in its extent by America, would on:y have formed fresh matter of complaiut, and a new ground .„,.jor declining her demands, . ; i America mmt feel that it is impossible for Great Britain to . galicind her (Seders in Coon - ell whilst the French Decrees are offictaily declared to remain in force against all nations not sub scribing to the new maritime code promulgated in those De crees, and also without some:Ain more explicit on the part of Anamica, with regard to her upderstandipg as 1s the conditions • entered by France to the repeal of these Decrees. Fur, of er what has passed, unless a lull sod satisfactory ezplanation be made on both these points, Great Brita;n cannot relinquish her re•aliatory system against France, without 'lmplyitig her consent to the wirniseibiaty of the condhions in question. • 'I hese observations will, I an, sure, appear sufficiently obvious to you, hie, on perusing the enclosed paper. t _ It will be at once acknowledged, that this paper is a repobli t melon of the Lenin and Milan Decrees in a more aggravated form, accompanied as it is with an extension of all the obtiosi " bus durtrines which attend those Decrreo, inflamed by a decla ration that Bonaparte has annexed to France, every lode. pendent SWe in' uts neighbourhood which had chided them ; and that be was proceeding against all other. maritinie pairs of Burope, on the pretence that his system cou.4 not laearerina.- , amn and complete, so long as . they retained4oir4ary with maitre' to it. o . I ' I.• -If lAisv .• The outrageous principle here avowed connectable. l- •oasly with tile proposition too much countenanced bytatnierica, • Oat the madman al eystein of Potaparte, as fae aciroptnites•to the of neutral property on shore, on the ground of • Mich property being British produce or manor:lc:tire, is a mere ' rovnitioal resubmit Nr Lich neutraJ ur be.ligerent nations have , ~ au right to resent, because It does not Violate any principle of the I law of venous- It is unnecessary to recur to isle various ergo mews by vehicle it has been stiewn that this system does not pato take of the character of municipal regulation, which neutral or btlitgercro nations have no right to resent, because it does nut viulaic any pond, le of the law of nations; but that it is a mere war meisure, direced with the molt hostile spirit against Great Britain; alti in order to extend this system on the principie of manicipal regulation, all the rights of independent ueutral na tions ate to he violated, their territoriesto be seized without any Whet cause of war whatever, but that !hay may be incorporated soils the French nation; and thence becoming . subject to her sights of dosriamm, receive the continental system as a munici pal regulattou of France, and thus the mere possibility of non compliance with the whole of the system is made the ground fur the occupatioo or invasion, the incurporr ion or extension of pity mate where the French arms cut reach. . • : ' Great Broads caonotbelleve that America will pot feel a just • leagued= at the full development of mat a system, which, bideed, tomparte has partially opened Wore, and has in the , brume of the Bausemic towns otPotttigal, and other countries, carried into complete esecutiom, but which be has never COL& Ualliged thltil its ilLt cot until the present annum : and t e tt t an Waking awl putoostereasabapa does he now Wilmot to bring forward and pcoss - to tile aide ithish ha is to face " a u a aL;aaa f Ha assumes Ow' treaty of Utseeht to lte la ~` i ~ _ _ - force, and to be a law binding upon all nations I because is 1 . 44 its his convenience, at tine moment when the Navy of France is driven from the ocean, to revive the doctrine of " free ships making free goods," he has recourse to a treaty no longer in force, in which such a stipulation existed—a treaty which, by his own express reflital at Amiens to renew any of the ancient monies, was not then revived as even binding on Great Britain and France,between Whom alone, as parties to it, and only while, they were at peace with each other, could it ever bate had any legal effect ; yet even this treaty is too narrow a basis for his present pretensions, since he cannot find , it in les rule for limiting maritime blockades to fortresses actually invested, besieged, and iter..ly to be taken; no provisior of any description having been made in that treaty either for defining or reguleting , blockades. . Surely at such an instant, America will not urge Great Britain to abandon or to soften any precautionary any se:aliatory rights against such a Power. The &Uhl Government not only feels itself imperiously bound to defend them, as they respect Great Britair., with all vigour, but to call upon every nateon to resist such exorbitant pretensiuns. if Great Brihun, at such a moment, were to relax her Orders in Council against France, would not all other nations have rea- Ann to complain that the common cause was abandoned ? America must feel that Bonaparte is not acting, as, led-eel, lie never has acted, with any view of establishing principles of real freedom, with respect to navigation ; but is met ely endeavouring to cloak his determination, if possible, to ruin Great Bniatn, by novel demands, and rejected theories of maritime law ; and America must see, that Bonaparte's object is to exclude British commerce from every coast and port on the Continent ; and that in pursuit of this object, trampling on the rights of independent States, he insultingly proclaims his determination to effect it by directinvasion of those independent Sates, which lee insultingly terms a guarantee; thus making she meet solemn and secred terms in the law of nations synonymous with usurpation of ter ritory and extinction of independence. America must see, : that as the States hitherto in his power have been seized on. to gee. raace his syetem ' lie is new proceeding to destroy whateier le ma ns of independence in other neutral States, to utak, thaegua rantee complete. From his want of power to pass die. Atlantic with his armies (a want of power which the United States are Indebted to the novel superiority of Great Britain), his system of a guaranteeing force may fail as to America. but as he cannot hope to shut American ports against Great Britain, by occupancy and invasion, he hopes to effect his purposes by management and fraud, and to accomploh that by insidious relaxation, winch he cannot accomillish by poWer. . • Great Britain , he feels, is only to be ruined by excluding her from every port in the world: be hopes, tfferefei e, to shut every port in Europe by force, and every port in America by manage ment : he pretends to cenciltate America by applause of her conduct, and a partial relaxation of his system in her favour. He accompanies the promise of repealing his Decrees with condi tions, which be trusts America will cot disavow, and which he knows Great Britain must reject; knowing at the same time that the relaxation of his Decrees e.ell be of little use tuAmerica, without a corresponding relaxation by Great Britlin, lie throws every obstacle against concession to America by Great Brim ii, Imaking her perseverance in her retaliatory system more than ever essential to her honour and evacuee. And sprely it will not escape the notice, or fail to excite the indignation of the American Government, that the Ruler of France, by taking the new ground now assumed, has retracted the concess on which America supposed bins to have made. He hat inconsistently and contemptuously eft hdrawn from her the ground spoil which ehe has taken an hostile attitude against Great Britain, since the repeal of our Ortb re in Council; and even the renunciation of our rights of blockade, would no longer suffice to obtaii. a repeal of the Betlin and Milan Decrees. His Majesty's Government canton but bore that America, considering all the extravagant pretensions set With by the Ruler of France, in the Duke of Baoaao's Report, and at the same time the resolution to march his armies into all States, into the putt; of which the English flag is admitted, will acknowledge, that this doctrine and resolution constitute a complete annihilation of neu trality, end that she Is bound as neutral : tate to disavow and resist them. Every State that acquiesces in this Rcpyrr, most act upon the pr incipie, thitt neutral and enemy are to be consi dered henceforward as the :erne el the language of the French law of eetiuns, and Greet Brown bad a right to consider that every nation who refuses to admit her flag upon the principle assumed, adaii.s and recognizes the dot rine cat the Report. I will rot now trouble you, e:r, with many obeervauons rela tive to the blockade of May, 1806, as the legality of that bteck ade, aesuming the .blockading force to have been sufficient Co enforce it, -has latterly not been questioned by you. I will merely remark, that it was impoesible Great Britain should receive otheiwise than with tine utmost jealousy the un expected demand mad.- by America for the repeal of the block ade, as well as of the Orders in Council, when it appeared to be made subsequent to, if not in consequence of, one of the con. ditious In Bonaparte's pretended repeal of his Decree, which condition was renouncing what he cal's " our new principles of blockade; that the demand on the part of Amer-ca was addi tional and new, is sufficient!' proved by a reference to the over ture of Mr. Pinckney, as well as from the terms on which Mr. Erskine had arranged the dispute with America relative to the Orders in Council. In that arrangement nothing was trought forward with regard to this bloOkade. America would have been contented at that time without any reference to it. It certainly is not more a -grit yance or an injustice now than it was then. Why then es the re nunaationsof that blockade insisted upon now, if it was not ne cessary to insist upon it then ? It is diffic tilt to find any answer but by reference to subsequent communications between France, and America, and a disposition in America to countenance France in requiring the disavowal of this blockade and the principles upon which it tested, as the conZition rim gas sew of the repeal of the Berlin and Milan Decrees. It seems to have become an ob ject with America, only because it was prescribed as A condition oy France. On this blockade, and the principles and rights upon which it was founded, Bonaparte appears to rest the justification of all his measures for abolishing neutrality, and for the invasion of every State which is lint ready with him . to wage a war of extermina- ' thin against the commerce of Great Behan. ' Ainerice,thereote, no doubt, saw the necessity of demanding 1 its renunciation, but abe will now see that is in reality vain either for Atnerieu or Or eat Britain to expect an actual repeal of the French Decrees, mod Great Britain renounces, First, the basis, 1 viz the blockade of 1806, oo which Bonaparte has been pleased to found them ; next, the right of retaliation, is subsequently et. 1 ted upon in the Orders in Council; fureher, till the is ready. to j receive the 'beat>. of Utrecht, interpreted and applied by the 1 I Duke of Bassatio's Report, as the universal law of nalious; and Gaily, till she abjures all the principles of maritime law which support her estabeehed rights, now more than ever essential to her existence as a nation. Great Britain feels confident that Amer'ca never can ntaintaln or ultimately ,auction such pretensions, and his Royal Highnets r eetse Prince Regent entertains the strongest lives that this tan proceeding of France wilfetrip her measures of every remount of . disguise, and that America, in justice to what she owes to the, lasi of nations and to her own honour as a neutral State, wain staniiy withdraw tier countenence from the outrageous systemof :t the French Government, and cease to support by hostile measures agatnst British commerce the enormous fabric of usurpetion and tyranny which France has endeavoured to exhibit to the World as the law of nations. America cannot now contend that the Orders in Council ex ceed in Spirit.of retaliation what is demanded " the Decrees, the _by 4. principle;, or the uturpatiiina of Bonaparte. The United States Government must at Last be convinced that the partial relaxations Of those Decrees in favour of America have been insidioully adopted by France for the mere purposes a inducing her to close her ports against Great Britain, which France cannot effect her self by torte, and she must admit that if Great Rehabs word now to repeal her Orders in s Council against France, it.would be gra tuitously allowing to France the commerce of America and all the benefi:s derivable from her flag, as an ;additional instrument fur the annoyance of Great Britain, and that at a moment when every State is threcened with devruction, or really destroyed, for merely supeorting their own right to trade with Great Vri am commanded, bar, to express i on the part of his iti4al Highness the Prince kegent, that while late Royal Highness ea. team nb the 'atm sin:sere desire to continue America, he yet OM never concede that the blockade ut May, 1806, could justly l i ut ma d e the tutinalariutt, as it avowedly has been, for the Decrees aid bunaparte; and further, that the Beulah Gotarnuactit must eve Cousid. the pi Liciples os uh - cb that blockade road, =onion: stied as it was by an adequate blockading force, to have Was strictly consonant tp the est:alb/led law of ration., and a kg.ti• mate 113)fiDCC of IL* practice Which it recogniz-s. beeoadq, 'Haste (Arca Britain must coa thus to reject the other spurious doctrines promulpted by Franco in the Duke of Bits sano's Report, as blotting upon all uatiaut. S:ie cannot admit as a true declaration of pubic law, tha: tree ships Make free goods,' -~ ... I:1 Tour letter tO which I allude caw Do* stands, tit . not a pretence rain a repeal of her Orders in Coe the ihitish Government neve idea that the repeal of tonne Or dal or eonditiocal repel cf always avowed was her reargness ctl as soon as France resch:ded Decrees. She could ;tot enter' the grossest Injustice to her a .ammral ; much leas could she do ces ise grated by France upon cane aft Important and indisputable Empire." According to the tenor of Top, my recollection is, that the Orders in Council were led States, it was speci/led t. must be repealed singly and States, but be repealed also , that in no•less extent of a resift Govenunent ever pledged itself However susceptible the pat construction recoitcrleable with I Lord Lkottlertagli, yet as a sindll went on other occa•ions has had as it is important, in every - . tinders . ending, or possibilii; ; Tiering that you will t.avc in any circumstance, my t Hour iii Lord Castlerggh's 4 nour robe, Ste. (t Aug. J. Foster, ace. ace. MR. FOSTER nor lbw convene of that propersh ion, that enemy's ships destroy the character of neutral property in the catgut she cannot eon. Sent by the adoption of euch a principle to deliver absolutelyobe couunerce of France from the pressare of the naval power a Onetilititain, and by the abuse of the neutral Lig to allow her gamy to obtaia, without the expence of 'attaining a navy, for the trade arid property of French subjects a derive of freedom and security which even the commerce of her awn subjects can not lied under the protection of the British navy. bk.:gamut admit as a pr nciple of public law, that a maritime blockade can alone be legally applied to fortresses actually inves ted by lend as well as by sea, which is the plain wearing or coo 'sequence of the Duke ot Bassano's definition. . She cannot admit as o principle of public law, that arms and , military stores are alone contraband of war, and that slap-timber I and naval stores are excluded from that description. Neither can she adroit without retaliation that the nacre fact of commercial intercourse with British poem and subjects should be made a crime in aU nations, and that the Armies and Decrees of Fraticeareoull he directed to enforce a princple so new and unheard-of in war. Great Britain feels, that to relinquish her just measures of sell defence and retaliation would be to surrender the best means of her own preservation and rights, and with them the rights of other nations, so long as France maintains and acts upon such principles. 1 am commanded to re-present to the Government of America, that Great 4r.taia feels herself entitled to expect from them an, unreserved And candid disclaimer of the rights of France to im pose un her and on the world the maritime code which has been thus prornuigated, and to the penalties of which America is her selt declared to be liable if she tails to submit herself to its exac vow. America cannot, for her own character, any longer tent porise on this subject, or delay coming to a distinct explar.athan with France as well as with Great Britain, if she wishes to clear herself' grant the imputation of being an altter of such injustice. America, as the case now stands, has not a pretence for cleating . Sir—l haste received your from Great Britain a repeal of her Orders in Council. She newt ~plartation relative to the supposed recollect that the British Government never fur a moment coun patch lrom Lt rd Caulereagh to is tenanted the idea that the repeal of those Oolets could dipend • • cummtinicatelo you confidential's, upon any partial or additional repeal of the Decrees of Frence , you, that while I conceive it t What she always avowed was, her readiness to reseed her Or. - planation upon a single polio i ders in Council as aeon as Franc* rescinded abso.utely and uu withoutretatrieg to the whole , conditionally her Decrees. to r Sloe could not enter into any other engagement without the altosether irregular el y i entenf ormal, into grossest injustice to her alimes as well as the neutral satious in :implication so eintr - general, much less could she do so, if any special exception was wring you, that my note of A. 4 ' to be granted by France upon conditions uttetly subversive of stance of time dispatch alluded 'the most important and intliseuteble maritime rights ot the Bii- In the correspondence that Usti Empire. us in conseque-ce of the new placed Ametica has now a proceeding forced upon her by France, on bassaao'e retort hasextre thmme', • . , s, I shall tie which, without eurrendoring any ot those principles which she 'mantel may deem it necessary for her own honour and security to main- any topic which you may r ve the honour to be, , sir, your most °beetle tam, the may separate herself from the violence and injustice of I have ' the enemy. She owes nbt only to herself to ado so ; but she is ce a re ' 'l . o the Hon..' Monroe, 1 •Intitl:d to reseet that course ot conduct on the part of France , Mit. 1.11.941 which is the only impedim an to her obtaining what she 'desires - at the hands of Great lit tta.n, namely, the repeal of the orders m in CouticiL I Sia—l have had the honour I ant authorised to renew to the American Government the as- day, hi reply to mine of th surance of his Royal Highness's anxious desire to meet the wishes As the dispatch of Lord in of America upon this point, whenever the conduct of the enemy to me nay official character, will justify hint in so doing. . was shown to hint accordingly,. Vhiht America can persuade herself, however erroneously authorised - such a communication that the Berlin and Malan Decrees had been actually and totally conceive in what sense such - repealed; and that the execution of the engegeinent made on mbar confidential, or bow it could condition by the British Government had been declined, she was to receive one comm.- might deem it justifiable, as a consequence of such a persuasion, to treat the interest and commerce of France with preference and Congress another, liable, different or doubtful censteuetioa. friendship, and those of Great Britain with hostility—but this Sir, that on a reconsideration of delusion is at an end—America now finds the French Decrees not that there can be no impropriety' only in full force, but pointed with augmented hostility against contained in pay letter of -,, - la te at Britain. thip expectation, I Batter maim Will the Government of the united States declare, that the of freeing your own commuukation measures now taken by France is that repeal of the obnoxious li• yto mocoristruction. With aa' Decrees, which America expected would lead Emile repeal of the quire, whether the passage '- British Orders in Council ? Will the American Governnient, on which Tmatt.%°eetn n tinn ' unless upon the principle of denying our re•allatory right of the Orders In Council: mew blockade, under any imaginable circumstances declare, that there - absolutely an d n"ro"ditimalit is at this moment, a ground upon which the repeal of our Orders h a g , t h a t th e "errett must b. in Council san be prese.d upon us; or that the 'tepeel should now Valuations, as well as to tb ' • be warranted upon any other ground than an express abdication . I have the bonotu of the right itself, which America well knows, whatever may be 1 : Aint e l. Fee stir; etc. &c. ! our desire to conciliate, is a concession which the British Govern ment cannot and will not make. II this be true, for what purpose can she persevere In her hos. m • tile attitude towards Great Britain, and her friendly one towards . • /LOUSE 01 France ?Do the American Government really wish to aid ai ace ' Ihe Rom! Asent was et in her attempt to suijugate Great Britain ? Does Amenca ex- seised 'Eases Bill, the Same pest taut Great Britain, coneetelieg against France, wad, at the rill, the Exchequer Bills P . . intance of America, disarm herself, and submit to the mercy of ral others. The Com:mist the opponent? It both these TICS:100S are answered in the ire- Hexeowar, and Lad W A gutter, upon what ground can she for a moment longer continue Tile tart of HARROW , the hostile measures against us? Ihe American Not hummer, the Select Committee. chosen . Act was framed upon the express principle of couthiu ng in force relating to the pruvi. ciao thee/ twice* against the Power, whether France or hireat Britain, that should of his L or dsh i p, was jiges id refuse to repeal its respective laws, of which onierica thought A Message from the Commons herself entitled to complain ; but the repeal contempla re by that Bia, the otapenda Bill, and act was a bona fide repeal, and not a repeal npon an inadnuateble Lneiand and Ireland. They condition—and America can never be justified in continuing to lama Loan, the Suld:ess' Wives resent against us that tailute of relief, which is alone attributed . s e v era l ether Bills, were rea d, and to the insiduou• policy of the enemy, that liar for the purpose of . embarrassing the discussions interwoven the qui stion of the De- ' HOUSE creel, with the exaeeton of a relinquishment or almost the whole system of our Maritime law. The House was sumo:mead ' 1,„ It is not fur the British Government to dictate to that of Ante- the Royai Assent given hy . rico what ought to be the measure of her just indignation against Taxes Bill, the Postage 1 the Ruler of France, for having . originated and persevered in a Bills Bid, Irish treasury system of lawless violence, to the tubversion of neutral right s 'Bill, Charitable Donations ' Copper Duty Bill, Linen , which being necessarily retaliated by Great Britain, has exposed America, with otter neutral States, to looses which the British Miaow Bill, and kW= other Government has never ce.aed most sincerely to deplore—Ames - ' T he Lu n d" N ew 1. `"" P i rice must judge fur herself, how much the original injustice Of I Bill, were severally reads' Praiser towards tier has been aggravated by the fraudulent profes- ' , aa The Non'e went Into : dons of relinquishing her Decrees, by the steps adopted to mfr .D"' —Report, toatn"rrner• 1 lead America, in order to embark her in measures which we trust 1 The Local Tarns bill, 'she never would have taken if she could have foreseen what has Commercial Exchequer Bills now happened; and ul.irnattly by threatening America with her time and passed. i vengeance as a denationalised State, _gibe dots not submit to be ; The APlonrtaden Bilis the itiairument of her designs agaiast Great Britain. ! Man Spirits litU, were each t. little arc consider a ti o ns for America to weigh ; bet what we. reed a second time to-morrow, are entitled to claim at her hands as an act, not lea of policy ' 'lb. Smugglers 818 and Cut than justice, is, that she should cease to treat Great Britain as an and ordered to be commi red enemy. The Prince Regent does not desire retrospecting, when 'I . he Life Annuity bill the interests of two countries so naturally connected by innu- to - mor row ' Time Repert on the Army , nwrable tits gre concerned. It is more consonant to his Royal Highness's sentiments to contribute to the restoration of tar- the Bill ordtred for the third may and friendly intercourse, than to inquire why it has been . The Manure Carriage I interrupted. leelin iaconv from .. not Ling has been canoed on his part relieve Amend ,front e enienem to which a trowel oact-at i to be read a second time to . to The Report of the Committee syceni of wartgre on the p -of France unfortunately continues the N'iiirerelit it ' SOititi°4s agreed to expose hit; and that the ''assent Unfriendly relations, which ' RESOLUTIONS to their mutual prejudice subsist between rate two countries, ! . Sir T.TURTON have grown out of a miummeeptieta on the part of America both he intended to propose, of the cquduct and purpose of France: his Royal Highness eon- - to the Mouse •an Anal, skiers himself entitled to call upon Amer:et to resume her stelae ! • limo of amity witlrGreat.Britain. In doing so she will ben pro- Country. At the suggestion vsde for the interest ot her own people; and I tun authorised to EX.:helper, it was Ms ' assure the American GevernMent, "het although his Royal High- Ralsolutions should be . cress, acting in the name and on•the behalf of his Majesty, can . ken • tnto contideration never cuter the fundiouretal niox'uns 9f the &Oath Mon ta k en . • , , . . h i matters of maritime r i g h t , as coasonanr to t h e recogn i ze d j aw •reau tnem, making a leW I. •sations, of nations, to be prejudiced in his hands; his Rol at Highness will - propose, that the fartheratosideratiou should-- s be ready at alt times to conc e rt withAtursont b as to their exercise; • poned to Wednesd Ay, when Counter-resoiutioas MIA and so to regulate their application, and to combine, as fairla b ". ' perhaps, be brought lot wird. Th e H o nouraiit may be, the tmeretts of America with the objects of elfeeloolly ell• retaiiseing upon France the measures of her own injumice. ronet then proceeded to read Isis f;rst.HA+o l6ll44 _ e I will now terminate this letter by assuring s Utl, : ir, as sus apecting the amount of the funded debt ost tba4g ee.• with perfect truth, that the :neat cordial and sincere des re ,41•ia' - mates that Councils of Great Britain to concd'a te Amu tee, .afar &relay be cumisistent with the principles upon which site preset iratien of the power and indepeuderce of the British iiii.,:ar.:Ly is held essei.tially to depend, and which cannot be abaodutied with' cut throwing her helpless and disarmed into the preset:lm Of her adversary.— I have the honour to be, with great respect, Ike. (Signed) Au& J. fOlifllt. lames Monroe, Esq. Secretary ot State. [Here follows a trenslatim of the Report of the Master of Fe reign Relatimmui to the Conservative Semite, in the sad% of the tOth of March, late.] . •• PARLIAMENT' . . • MR. 1101480 Z TO Ma. FOSTER. DePartittent of State, luot s, itlii the hoer of May 30th, which I gad the bottoms' tO receive from you on the tat instant, Ilmredye a dlffaerpro in a particular passage of it from a 'assay Ost tbe tarot wit*ea,ta the dispatch from Lord Castlereagh to you. wrhich roe itirekirito pod ae to eopunuoicate to inp enure, as appears trona One mei t tips kfcet to Lave been iutadoad by ycs.4evenialegi t /41t ps4i • lode Is as follows : s Jam, l i mo pretreee ter chiral,/ Goa (levie in Count& She mum realm cure for 11 0101111 the streetalleted e Ortkis could dewed epee n ap cf the Co.:tees of Frame. 1,1 1 4, ‘ sebum to remit:dim (W e i% dad absolutely and sec Calikhell y cr iota gay Mbar T allies as svrH 1111 neutral g j a h" the do so if any speeial maga s )n candlions utterly subversiv e ' Parable nsarithne nibs of t h e of the dispatch of Lod • tar In mating tie candigisce ao 11--, ▪ to be repealed is reletiee mar t that the Decrees of Sega rid td speciellr is relation to the No as to all other newral toile t% repeal of the Deal. bad :ha , itself to repeal the Orden in Cowl, he passage in year letter asap* with the import cif tie *pool I 6inillar W•rautelogy of yaw es had a construction Las metes r veeyeet,-that there . should ham riy of error, you will meats mea t c the goodness to ir.fcrto me eh& recollection of the ,liipi a r t dispatch is inaccurate. 1 Le v , ft :: (Sigutd) tastes 4gu ait • • • 'ER TO Mt. MON/tOrke Wasbingtat, Jae / i s t hA t MIT letter of fu-d4r, ru t s hi aa r unloved mining ut a House n 44. • cash to me, that 11.14 the heater I I are I beg Lave towel- e it to be very ddhseli to gu e au , chit In n note et cotwd.raoie lesok whol e caMlit, and oho belay stesh Cr into a &ocelot% top. m ug e lm ,formal, vet I have uo hesitates si b of May 3u, cattails the elk* gb, tied to. that will probably ta k e Na p h ey new groliod upon which Wed d the ,ttuestion tutie totemea tar , mely halLry to enter at fob te t c hy " wish particularly to Osten. • at, with the highest coadderoisa sit re.lletit bumble Servant, &e. &e. Ace-I-I*W • ;ROE TO Nit. FOSTER. ' .r I 4.partnient of State, Jobe 4, onour to receive your ktttr olywe the same date. d Catkrebeh wu conutonintedkity. ICUS, to be shewn to the Pr, essii ingly, and as the dish atda 'met** lineation to thfs Government, 1 - Itch a proceeding cool be • could bc understood that Me insunicetion for itself, and hawing i , in the oplition of the kwartheAlis hdrumbots. I Woo . Pentatir ration of the subject you will 0.11 ropriety 1n a compliance wades.* yestelday. Should I be eurehesit r meld that you will me Mopes* 4moicotion from embigelty sad . With a view to this, pelt nols► rge ittioer letter, maim * rut always avowed its oldies maimed nartm' y, as soon as Mete renedsi, malty, her Decrees, includes hits web at be rescinded; eh MIAOW te eke the Uhited Steam . *Dohs to be, &e. fain =spot. c. rrARr PROCIOINGS. • Dv L0R14 4 , JULY emu by Commutes a die wise Uut.es the trial Bell, the Coppet Doles 1111, 1111 24 1 _ salotien were tie Coosoemaim, lOW VAsstualeam. W BY saw oa the TAM 105,0 to consider the secret UtmutbaliCAS 11.0 41111,1111 WNW !gild lob. pneted. • uttunons biva l ent tip the Yablidedll ad +outlier dui ectaiiag to the baba riser Were raw the telie. rs' Wive! an 3 .Fasolies t`nolselk et • read, and the I - Linse aojestreld! 'E OF COMMONS. tumid to the Hume of !Ards, .slin by ii :as i.cs istAe .tr a ta w ri f ie fic s aert MEM r ittli. hasbeitier &ma= I Bowe Bid, We.kinitia na lI.L, Neu tosedlatui hes OIL 41 Alter halls. oa Bill, and the Nitmlielde a till.; tittle sad pawed. a Committee on the Ckettsillii. Brlas ,fee Scotch wereeinScetch e Sitivrami raid a d pcudt e ngtell ol t 3riac ll rrt , ticodi t wrar hs :er W mani m fiorstudat e i bo v :i :meyere se . , Bi reada ll s a:d itcsaidg tbe ra lded : , hit went tlyough Luc Committee. 2. 01 a m tß ir o y i d ma P r ow e r rr a:d o e i w t natd is M lO 2 : T ino fia l trow a : e . lll 7 4ll4 o4 nuni ssiriteedu tte A e t.r ot i.v :up to ply rix poo 4 brongld itcr. 410111 10... : . to, in e y nt niL t ae, gl I g aal i L h etY l S ‘ ti U n E n l et n id oth o e r o f D. anterior a f etti n IC he F o e h i i v ah o e . b C h a nce I l i t, ' to ion. At present he ibitdd i!eci..wtobasibrierderohasertiovaascihoi.LionsTabeitio.dlol Orci.i.filic MC difiVll{it VII U 1 11.1111.1C1i wpm+ , ..... ....- 1 last February. • teC it Wo CHANCELLOR be irasbible id a LLOlt ofheEF . li.:2 o l 4 said, that ' form a correct judgment of the liesolaileallib' had been read; but A. he apprehended that eaTT EI hot contain so ample a detail of the state of the - nonce of the country, as it V.iti wits) to t 11 40: 4 the House at the close of the Sessions,: bit .. leave to give not . ee thathc should_ _ . _About - *. solutions upon the same- subjeCo l llool l. •,A uh,lcr the consideration of . the H040 . .4 4 P:Pr .. • ; day with those of the Honrurable ad s. assi • L ' , -. 4 ' 4 - r. Mr. VANSITTAAT laprodod SO" . ''' i other resolutions o 3 itoesubj.t.t• astir * those of the . tifinourable Bag* I preheasive.--The debat e e t at= o4 l ll l ll to be adiniarnecl till W i •