Star. — London, England, 1820-08-17 00:00:00

coirEs,.4 UG UST 14. . This interesting place eras never more:full than present. The inns and. lodgings are crowdedlo el cess, and such is the accommodating disposition of the inhabitants, that many private nouses are open to strangers, who seem determined to put up with every inconvenience rather than forego the more substan tial plea,sures of this terrestrial Paradise. The Coburg steam packet, from Southampton and back, by the rapidity, regularity, and safety, with which she per forms her daily voyages, is fast gaining the confi dence of the I'ublic. Last week she conveyed to and fro above 1200 persons, and amongst them many families of the first class, so that her reputation may be said to be . completely established.—Amongst the visitors aye distinguish Lord FITZHA RRIS and family, Lord and Lady GRANTHAM, Lord DARNLEY, Lord Cnir - ros, Admiral 111.1ou, Lord GEORGE Sevuoun, the lion. Colonel linowx, Major PATERSON, Captain GRANT, Mr. SHER, Rev. Dr. DEAR and LEE, Gene ral Sir FREDERICK ROTTENBURG, &c. &c. and to crim n the whole, our august SolizitetcN, with a sviendid retinue, is expectei daily. ASSIZES. HEREFORD. BENNET V. SIR C. NIORGAN. This was a Srecial 'Jury cause. The plaintiff is an Innkeeper at Brecon, and, during the contested Election for that County, kept open house for the de fendslit's son, one of the Candidate% The worthy and independent Freeholders, according to a certain document called a long bill, drawn up in due form by the plaintiff, had contrived to eat, drink, and devour the good things of this life, to the amount of . J.:(2,700, but the Gentlemen who acted for the defend ant, in promptly settling the various demands against bim, on account of the Election, formed a .afferent estimate of the gastric powers of the Freeholders of Breconshire, and offered £9OO as a fair sum. The plaintiff, not content, brought his action ; but the Juzy confirmed the opinion of the defendant's Com mittee, and awarded 000, which had been pre ♦iously paid into Court. SURREY. DOE ON DEMISE 07 DUDMAN V. ATTFIELD. This was an action of ejectment, on the issue of which depended the legitimacy of several children. The action was brought by J. Dudman, as the son and.heir of J. Dudman deceased, to recover posses iion of certain copyhold estates at. Farnham. The late Mr. Dudman, who died in 1813, was a tradesman at Farnham, and in 1791, he formed an i.licit connection with a young woman, who was then hi a menial capacity at a public-house in that town, the consequence of which was the birth of a female child. The intercourse continued until Mr. Dud man's sister, who had kept his house, was about to let married, and he then expressed his determinationl to enter the matrimonial state with the young woman alluded to. In October, 1792, he went from Farnham with her for the avowed purpose of getting married in London, and they returned in a few days as man and wife. They lived in high repute in the village far many years, during which she bore several chil dren, and no question was attempted to be raised as t ) their legitimacy until the death of the father and mother, upon which events the relations of the for , mer took possession of the property which the plain tiff; as eldest son and heir at law, sought to recover. Eleven witnesses were examined, all of whom con curred in stating the above facts,' Tice register of the births of the children'born after the supposed mar riage were produced, and it appeared they were re gistered as the children of John and Mercy Dudman. The register of her burial was also put in, and she was there described as Mercy, the wife of John Dud -eon. She was similarly described on a tomb erected to her memory. Mr. MARRYA Tr, for the defendant, contended, that if*they had really been married, the mother would have been eager to blazon it to the world. He re marked on the extreme improbability of the story of th marriage, and observed, that a woman, situated "as she was, would have been married at Farnham, in tlle lace of her friends, and not have gone in a clan )4l:isPine manner to London for such a purpose. The CHIEF JUSTICE charged the Jury, who found a • verdict fur the defendant, thereby declaring the children to be illegitimate. ANDESISON V. RICHARDSON. This action was brought to recover damages for ari assault committed under curious circumstances. The plaintiff was.the daughter of a respectable tradesman in Church -street, Borough, and had for some time been on terms of a tender nature with a young man of the - name of Heron : it was confi dently anticipated that he would, in proper time, lead her to the altar. After some time, however, the false swain suddenly, and without any assignable cause, broke off the courtship, and married another woman. The effect of this .intelligence upon the young Lady may be easily conceived, and when it is stated that the defendant iu the present action was instrumen tal in bringing about this marriage, it will natu rally be supposed that the plaintiff regarded her with no small degree of acrimony. On the 29th of Octo ber last, Mts. Richardson called at the house of Mr. Anderson, the plaintiff's father; for the ostensible purpose of demanding the payment of a small bill; but the real object seemed to have been to have ajolly pow! Soon after her arrival the plaintiff came in, 1 and 'high words ensued between them ; the pl a i nt iff' accusing Mrs. Richardson of lending money to Mr. Heron for the purpose of enabling him_ to form this matrimonial connection, while Mrs. Richardson charged Miss Anderson with having had an'impro- j per intercourse with Mr. Heron. Accusations.- of this nature were not likely to restore peace, and after as &gent dialogue, Mrs. Richardson seized the. plaintiff, who was much the "weaker vessel," and having amused herself for some time with pushing and kicking her about the room, she left her. The consequence was, that she went into hysterics, and was ill for at least a month. This illness, the plain t:ln Counsel contended, was caused by the violence of Mrs. Richardson ; while, on the•other side, it was maintained, that it was solely owing to the irritabi lity of the young Lady's mind, it: consequence of her disappointment. Mn. Gillum, Surgeon in the Borough, was called to prove'clie indisposition of Miss Anderson ; but he admitted it alight be owing to mental irritation, and not awed by any bodily hurt. lie described the. plaintiff as a „Toting Lady of a 4104 Yirtnoss ' , And and amiable disposition, and said then wes not the least ground for the aspersion cast upon her in the heat off the quarrel by Mrs. Richardson. The case, under these circumstaleses,went to the Jury, and a 'verdict was found I@sti'dipplakaiiff Damages Five Pounds. THE KINO V. CHARLES MARTIN AIM VIVI OTHERS. This was an indictment against six defendants, named Martin, Western, Richerdson, Bogdan, Ben nett, and Anderson, for a libel on Richard Roffey, at the Parish of St. Mary, Newington, on the 10th of February, 1819. This prosecution arose out of the disputes which have for some time agitated the Parish of St. Mary, Newington. By the usages of that parish the Rector has the power of nominating one Churchwarden, and the parish another. The Rev. Mr. Onslow, the Rec tor, had nominated the prosecutor, Mr. Roffey, as his warden, and the parishioners had chosen Mr. Martin, the defendant, as theirs, in 1819. It had been the , practice to hold Vestry Meetings in the Parish Church at five o'clock in the evening, but, as was suggested, in consequence of the disgraceful scenes which some times took place, and the very late hour to which the discussions . at those meetings had been prolonged ', for some time previous to 1819, it was deemed expe dient by the prosecutor to change the hour for the assemblage of the Vestry, namely from five in the afternoon to nine in the morning. Soon after he came into office it became necessary to make a new Church rate, and also to take into consideration on what terms iron coffins were to be permitted for interment in the Church-yard—that mode of burial having been recently suggested as prOper.— In order to take both these subjects into considera tion, Mr. Roffey caused notice to be given in the usual manner by the Parish Clerk, from his reading. desk in the Church, that a Vestry Meeting would be held on the 3d of Febtuary, at nine o'clock in the morning. The alteration of the time for holding Ves try Meetings, it seems, occasioned a great sensation in the Parish, and accordingly, on the day above. mentioned, all the defendants appealed at the Vestry, and, as was charged, proceeded to propose Resolu tions highly defamatory of Mr. Roffey's character.— The defendant, Mr. Richardson, was stated to be an ' Attorney, residing in London, having a house at Newington; the defendants, Messrs. Bugdcn and An derson, were represented to be attorneys clerks, and also inhabitants of that Parish ; and the remaining defendants to be tradesmen, some of them carrying. on business in London. On the occasion in question, Mr. Richardson was stated to be the fraMer of the Resolutions, the purport of which was to insinuate that the prosecutor's object in altering the time for the assemblage of the Vestry, was to obtaina packed meeting of inferior inhabitants of the Parish, who would be subservient to the purposes of himself and the Rector. The Resolution which was the principal ground of the present indictment professed "to be a declaration of the sentiments of the Vestry, that the conduct of the prosecutor, in attempting to alter the time of the meeting, was a violation of the rights of the Vestry-men, an insult to the Parish, and a disgrace to the Rector who had appointed him. It further stated, that he was wholly unworthy of the confidence of the parishioners, and was an object of their just indignation. It appeared that all the de fendants, except Mr. Bennett and Mx. Anderson, took an active part on this occasion. Another Resolution was passed, that the other Resolutions should be signed by the Vestry Clerk, printed, and circulated among the parishioners. The Vestry Clerk, it appeared, de dined signing the Resolutions, upon the suggestion of a Solicitor present that they were libellous, and in point of fact they were not published out of the Ves try Meeting. This case was proved by the evidence of the Rec tor, who presided on the occasion,- the Vestry Clerk, and other persons who were present. Mr. GURNEY addressed the Jury On behalf of the defendants, and contended that, as the Resolutions in question were of and concerning - the conduct of the prosecutor as a parish officer, and were not published to the world at large, they were perfectly venial, and consequently that his clients were not criminally liable. The CHIEF JustacE charged the Jury, that the 4th . Resolution, which was the subject of the indictment, was calculated to defame the character of the prose cutor, from its contumelious import, and inasmuch as it would be recorded to postezjty by insertion in the Vestry books, it was fairly the subject of criminal prosecution. In his Lordship's opinion, the Resolu tion alluded to was a libel; but. the Jury were not to be bOund by his opinion definitively ; they would exercise their own discretion upon the subject, taking into consideration that the evidence did not affect the case of two.of the defendants The Jury acquitted Mr. Bennett and Mr. Ander son and. found the other defendants Guilty.. • In consequence of the non-attendance of Gentle men summoned as Special Jurymen, in almost all the Special Jitry Causes-entered for trial, The CHIEF JUSTICE said. he felt it necessary to re prehend the apparent inattention to the duties, 41 Gentlemen qualified to serve as Special Jurors. He had observed, that in every other county on the Cir cuit) the Special Jurors had been most punctual in their attendance, and is few instances had it been found necessary to pray a Take. He begged it to be distinctly. understood, that the duty of Special Jurors was as imperative as that of persons who were impannelled to try common Jury Causes, and in con ' sequence of the unaccountable absence of Gentlemen summoned as, Special Jurors at this Assize, he an nounced, that if, on any future occasion, when he came this Circuit, he found cause of similar tom plaint, he should feel it his duty to fine the absentees. In the five Special Jury Causes entered for trial, there w ere not more than three or four Gentlemen who condescended to give their attendance, • I CROWN SIDE John Simpson was indicted on the Coroner's Inqui sition, for feloniously killing and slaying Jane Mor gan, on the 15th of April last, in the parish of St. Thomas, in the Borough of Southwark. The prisoner was the driver of a Chatham stage coach, and about eight o'clock in the evening of the day mentioned in the indictment.. it being dark, he' was driving at the rate of eight miles an hour, through the Borough, when the deceased, a woman far gone, in pregnancy, was crossing the road, and before she was aware of her danger, shq was knocked down by the leader, when the wheels of the carriage weet over her hotly, brokoher ribs, ruptured her ab domen, and produced premature pas-Whim. She was tajtes •up in a dreadful 'taw, and carried to St. Thomas's Hospitil,.where she died the next day, her infant surviving her two days. The prisoner, when spoken to upon his misconduct, behaved with great insolence, and in the most unfeeling manner. Tht Jury immediately found .him Guilty, and the CHIEF Jusriee, alluding to the but too frequent carelessness of persons in his situation of lire, ex pressed a hope that this melancholy catastrophe would be a warning to others against a brutal indif ference to the safety of their fellow-creatures, and taking into consideration the circumstance that he had been already confined for sixteen weeks, sentenced him to be further imprisoned in.the county jail for four calendar months. DURHAM.—CROWN MP - John Johnson, aged 21, was placed at the bar, charged with violently assaulting Jane Grieve, with intern to commit a rape. Ladies and boys were then directed to quit the Court. Mr. COOKSON appeared for the prosecutrix. He would not narrate to the Jury very particularly the circumstances of the offence with which the prisoner was charged. The facts would be stated by the wit nesses, and he was sure that evidence on such a sub ject was better heard once than twice. If it should not appear to the Jury that the prisoner had the tent imputed to him, be felt satisfied they would him guilty of a violent assault. He then .called ' • . Jane Grieve, who deposed that she lives at Twee& mouth, is a widow, and .thirty-eight years of age. Has been a widow fourteen months. On.the 7th of July last, was cutting grass Ina field at Tweedmouth; 'no one was with' her ; the prisoner came up to her, and spoke to her. She had never spoken to him, but had seen him before and knew.him. She the. repeated the conversation which passed between them. She said she wished to have nothing to do with his language. He then took the hook with which sb was working from her, and threw it into-.the corn; after which he chiew her. down, And took indecent liberties with her person. She cried out " Murder!" till some people in the next field heard her, and came t.) her assistance. Prisoner was using her badly nearly half -an Mtn.: He °asked if she wonid go home and tell? she replied that •she would and he threatened her if she did ; and at last he made her say, " Faith, twenty times, she would not go home' and tell." She shook and trembled very much, and could not run away, but at last got from him. He followed her, and again threw.her on the She then described the way in which he again a5...1 saulted her, which was brutal in the extreme. She exclaimed--" Oh! Harry Wetherburn, will you not save me?' Mary Wetherburn, who was at work in the next field, hearing her father's name, came to the place where the witness and prisoner were. - -Pri soner then went away, saying, " he had done no illy for he had plenty of witnesses behind the dyke" (ditch),, Witness was not able to get up without assistance. As soon as she could speak, she related what had happened to her.- She was very unwell for several days, when she sent ,for a midwife, and was eight days under her care. Cross-exainined by Mr. Losii.—She had had two husbands, bat both were dead. Has three children. Her last husband was seventy. He bad a little money. They were married at Lamberton,- iri the Scotch way, four miles from Tweedmouth . Maintains herself and children with the help of the.parish. . Had not lived: with the prisoner, nor spoken to him before. Doer not live with a man. ' • one year, and find sureties for his good behaviour for two years more, himself in £2O, and two surcies in the sum of £lO each. •• Bow-Sraeni.-s-ifenterdar a respectably dressed ma i was charged on suspicion of stealing a letter, containirg notes,- the property of the Rev. Bradford, who Leeds ' and in tbe month of July sent a letter, containing a X . .., note, and other notes, to a gentleman of the name of Hardy, cf Reading. This letter was never received, and on cz:qui:y heir • made, some faits were d4scoveredivhich led, to the a. , 7)rehez.: lion of the prisoner on whom were found £l4l, country notes. A letter from him to his w ife was ai:out same time intercepted at Birmingham, which contair.ed the vet • Xiiio note wlii:h formed part of the reartittance in Mr. Braillote ; letter. He was remanded. Gottsnitu..—Yesterday, Brand, - One' of. - the Nal sin.lrn.r. stated, that a poor woman, whodi thsusAhlerman.had °Merv!, t.. apply for. relief to the Parish Officcrs of St. Andrew, had so applied, and been retusel, / and afterwards died its. streetsfrom want. Witen at tht3 (Nice, silo raid she wide veral fruitless applications to the Parish Liaicers, and had po sustenance for six or seven:dap. The body had been taken !Ls the workhouse, and, as bet uspleltood, it w?s• intended to bury it without any Inquest ?lie ifrerefore, thought it his &Icy toWesi don the circumstance. fir, Payne, th 6 Chief Clerk, said, this was certainly a case Wlainh' demanded enquiry ; the • poor errs- Sure appeared to harp" died front st at ration ; Parish Ofikcers should have every protection in the execistk.n r.f their duty, cher should exercise it with humanity. Sir . Nry.taa ; LRICHTOI4 thikircitratiniided the Master of the 11:drkhOuse, happened to be present, to inform his I.lsers that, In his opinio there ottilitlo be an Inquest. titroxiii.—Sunday, the 31st ult.. about six in th. nnttniug, a very poor man, upwi , rdi of :60 yeinl 7 :4 itEe, named J. Tilly, was found murdered, ' alma Fthrown into the river Avon, aboUt 200 yards frtitn the town of Kingwood, Hants. The inhabitants of the place *ere at t loss to conjecture thecatve for the horrid deed ; Tilly being a very inoffensive man, who- scarcely.ever had a farthing in •his pocket ; he had, in fact, received parochial relief for malty yea' It appeared that he had been tived in a most shoc;.- ing manner, having receiVidi7rery severe blowi ez . the.head and body ; one'Ortikeyes was' beaten out of the socket, and lay &flit Oieek. It evidently .zsi. peared t.x), that the potic-fellow's throat had beep se verely pressed, Seai-ito ,cause strangulation. .The following mon - anens inquest was held on the body, and, at twelii'eclock at neon, adjottrneo,6ll 'eight in the ghillie. The inquiry was then renewecC-ithea ayerdiet:'6ft-;.“ Wilful Murder," was returnetligititnt some person or perscr.s unknown. . A .strotig:stisii cion hiving fallen on. persons near the town, Iva-- rants*ere granted, and a diligent search Tzde, but nothing has yet been found to lead'to .1; EEct;tto . x.-LAt twelve 'o'clock on Satur.i'.i', four unfortunate men, left for execution at Y.t rk,:aere . conducted-to the scaffold, whole, after juiciug Ordinary_in prayer, they sung a hymn, in a firm and • distinct manner t and .at . a quarter past. twelye the drop 'fell, at *Mai • Moment ihey were ipuniy en gaged to prayer; -and evinced the•-•aeepesicoh: trition at their-pail - offences, and acknciwicid:ged - zhe justice of their scultence% A few minute; bete! n•kax..• ing the prison, PickensgiliAatl ar. intemietrinvit4,l-0 wile and child;- which was. of 'i1)0 ip944,lftctnyiitt description.. Solargea colicpurtebf not been witnessed sincet he execution imf tl to Ltiddiiisl. • Accrozn.,--Friday last, a meta :cho'y 411:fitc . st• distressing event occurred. Punka& on RAO, Lei cestershire. The Rev. C. S. HOLDEN aii4.fapily,.cf As:on Hall, in the county of Derby, weiitia.the Ktl:, for the purpose of enjoying'. a feW hours' - atiiirleitient on thv.w*er,oand amidst the delightful st eaertUitti. which the Park aboustal. After havingvaitaken cf some refreshment, Mrs. Hotoew, having ‘expresel .her intention cif washing her hinds, w.alkerto & s.1)( - :• distance on the bank, and was observed by 'sorne the party, who had again asienibled.in the bda.,4'ifl were rowing up : the stream, to be inthc act of ktoop ing,down to dip her bands into the water, when her foot sipped; Ind she was precipitated into the ; Ai the place: where site fell in was deep, anti tern discoloured; ifotWitlkailding the .most pi(4nsn • assistance Vl2ll.tffordest,:ten-br fwelveininut !i2 i e'apsed before. the *Ay could' be-found, It %vas, without lop of time % oolvveped to the keeper's lodge in the Park,syhete the prices' for restoring suspended animation commenced inatnediately, and wa, caried on for a long tiine; -udder the superiutendei.ce of three medical Gentlertten;one of whoni happoned to be passing through the Park .at the time of me lancholy occurrence. Unh a ppily their.efforts ppm! Mary Wetherburn was working in a field near tb that where the prosecutsix was at work. She heard screams, but thought they had proceeded from boys , quarrelling about birds' nests, and did not take any particular heed. They give over for a little while, and then began again. Heard her father's • name called, and. went to see what was the matter. She was 200 yards distant. There was sr hedge between and a short field of corn. Saw prisoner and prosecu-, trix struggling, and'the man go away. He did not run away. The woman was crying, with her Clothes torn, and could not speak. Heard the man say, , s You need not say I have done you any ill, or used you badly, for I have witnesses at the back of the dyke." Prosecutriz went with the witness and wit ness's mother home, where she sat ahout a quarter of an hour, and then went . to her own honk-. Cross-saaminect.—wows Johnson very. well. He is a married man. Never knew anything wrong of the lad. He knows her well, and did not run away when the came up. Re-examined.—Proiecutrix complained that she had been badly used by Johnson the roper. Prosecti trix bore a good character for anything she knew. Jane Alderson is midwife of Tweedraouth. In July -last atteaded Jane Grieve. Was called in on the These day after the Friday , when the assault was committed. Witness deposed to the injury suffered by prosecutt ix, and which she believed was the effect of ill usage.-- She had practised for 16 years as a midwife, and had had considerable experience in her profession. Here the case for the prosecution closed. Mr, Loan rose to address the - Jury on behalf of' the prisoner. He said that he thought ;he prosecutrix did not come into Court without considerable impu tation on her character. According to her own ac count, she had married a Man seventy years of age, for Abe sake of his money ; and instead of the mar riage having taken place in the. Parish where they resided, it had occurred at Lamberton, in the Scotch way, a circumstance which justified a suspicion that ahem was something erroneous in her conduct. The .Learned Gentleman made a variety of forcible ob ,servations to the Jury, and concluded brexpressing his belief, that in what had been described as having taken place, the woman was consenting; for the man `must have been in a state of derangement to have committed the offence imputed - to hit% with t'be al-' most certainty of being detected staring him in the ,face. He had no witnesses to call, on account, as. the Learned Gentleman said, of the expewe that would have attended their being brought so great distance, and the prisoner was a piscr man ; but he had a certificate of - the prisoner's good character. • CO4L M Ac_pciss The Learned Judge here recalled some of The.wit- Airireb • • Shirs Sold. Mee. tresses and• put to them some questions, after which 49* Ni. n .w d t e ..t i s a t , le id .451. Ws 641 tn 39s 31 9 his Lordship summed up Pe evidence with his usual —L I :14s Oki to 40% :,!- clearness and minute attention. If the Jur y thOUN e s hl . Hlc II- NV ATta a 'I4)N the woman gave her consent. tliey'iVottld'aeqUit-t • ; 1 14 (1 4 1ing •• "P DON SKI DGB TOL:4011BL? trainee after prisoner; if, on the contrary, they believed The story - r r 47 14 " 4 " 1 "‘" • -• • - ---;• ---;• of the woman, they must End tok j`6tel ad'i t ohlithed I.n 4 Je. ) a the-first LOUIII. To be imprisoned tu-the j 4 , 11 • ,Pl7.cr, Tenvlc.Par. We-are requested to pnblish thefollor t g: ; leraer• patticular4 claiming the attention of thesa have beenimproperly tirated under this.comPlaiet: • TO THR EDITOR, OF ?HI STAR A &a—Observing a paragraph in your. Paper Peepectbg Curr-ef an Hernia (eta large size); by the Medical floare. st Charlotte Mouse, Greet Charlotte -street, Blackfriar's-read, in justice to Messrs. Cooraa and Co. I add my personal csetimer}. Having been afflicted nearly 110 . yeart, tied deellesed bearable I f eadeent Surgeoas, I patiently bore my afilictipa, expecting ever hoar to be my bet: • I at length applied'io the Medical 130e4.:, a adhave reason to pray 'for that eacelli-nt Esublisistaent, fer : :- though k anttwarly .5(1, I waj perfeetki.curedin a few reeks, now, theta Gbh, enjoy g-tiod health. C. PLEVOLAND. Dog and Stile, - St. George's-fields: Messrs. Copra* And Co. are consulted at Wecd stock-Ifouie, Woodstock -street, daily, and at (.'ha:- lotte.tiouse, Great Charlotte -street, opposite the Rowland .Hilrs - Chapel. Mechanics. have. Id7ice gratis every Evening, from Six till Eight ; and Sunday Mornings until-Twelve o'Clotk. - - N.B. Private Doors at each House, and .Priv; t! Doors fur Females.: • , • . - • - 11.i.RRTE1). - Wednesday sennight, at Sidraoutla, Lionel:ant-401. Stern to Charh.tte Ana, second daughter 01,0 4 . Itev..James Bern..:- 1 1 Timer of Combefllry, Somerset. • August 10, at Tilbury, Watiam Small, Esti. Weymou:h, to Catharine Frances Coswe'.l, youngest• daughter of the Its Charles-Coxweli, of Aplingtoti House; Gloucestershire. • • • • • • •'• IDIP.D.• • Monday senios!itiat:lrolktone, age.d of Ashford. 7C, ?Jr, Henry Cre, August fr, in Dulte.street, Westminster; agedite, the ct:rf ter of the late Dr. Hutton, more than half a century ago Arc• bishop of Cantvrtiary. August 6,, at• 13ouiogne.sor-lisr, Lady Shipley; relict cl thr lade Major-Gen. Sir t'llarl.3 Shipley, of the Corps of Itoya: Engineers, and Gove-nor of the Island of Orcuada. Attest 15, at Dover, aged 85, Thomas llPtentan Lane, rAI Deputy Lieutenant-Guresnor of Dover Castle, and one of :Jr Treasulers of Deveriliirhour. • .1 it wee -1- 6.11. •• • ME 1. . 7 ; "-!Z`:.. II I [