Star. — London, England, 1820-10-11 00:00:00

• • t.,.,.~. ..._ , evasion, was recalled, and examined by Dr. Lusantaxon, through the Lord Chancellor. lb Did you ever, on the journey of her Majesty to Naples, make any beds ?—I assisted in making them. Did you ever make William Austin's bed ?—I misted to make a bed for William Austin. Was that bed made for William Austin in her Royal High ness's bed-room, or in another apartment?—Sometimes, when there was room, it was made in her Royal Highness's bedroom, and, when not, in other places. The next witneu tatted wet imam Roam: Hownass, Esq. Erantined by Mr. TYXDALL. lam a Lieutenant iu the Navy. I am a Lieutenant since the early part of the year 1809, and am settled at Rouen, in France, with my family. I joined the party of her Royal Highness in April, 1815. She was then at Genoa. She re mained there six weeks after I had joined her. I recollect a circumstance which took place at Genoa one night.— It was supposed that the house had been broken into by some persons, and a general alarm was made in the night time. I got up in consequence of it. I went into the great hall. The first person I saw was Bergami. He came to my room, and gave me the alarm. He had with him a candle and a sword. My room door opened into the hall. I went into the ball. I found the Princess and many of the servants there. During the time we were at Genoa, I never breakfasted with her Royal Highness. I have seen her at breakfast. Bergami was not breakfasting with her. Did you ever know him to breakfast with her?—Never. You were in the habit of dining with her Royal Highness?— Yes, every day. D d Bergami ever dine with her while she was at Genoa?— Never. Where did Bergami Best begin to dine with her?—l do not recollect the name of the place, but it was in the course of our journey t St. Gothard, and in the month of August, 1815. Did be begin regularly to dine with her Royal Highness at that time ?—No. It was at the Villa d'Este he began regularly to dine with her Royal Highness. After we quitted Genoa we went to Milan ; there her Royal Highness resided at a place called Olivera. There was a staircase into which her Royal Highness's room opened, but it was not a secret staircase. It led to my apart ment where I slept, and to the chambers of all the lower servants. I do not recollect that the staitcase was used by the lower ser vants in going to their apartments, but I used to pass through it in going to my apartment. After we left Milan we went toVeniee. Her Royal Highness took up her residence at Villa d'Este, in September. 1 knew where her Royal Highness slept at Villa d'Este. After our long voyage, I recollect being at Tunis. I accompanied her Royal Highness during the whole voyage. Where did Bergami sleep at Tunis?—l recollect his pointing ma out his room, and I saw him in his roomusing it as his room. Was it near he r Royal Highness's morn ?—No. Describe the different situations of Bergami's and of her Royal Ilighress's rooms ?—Bergami's room was the only room up a flight of stairs. I never saw anybody occupy a room there but Bergami. There were several royals between the flight of stairs and her Royal highness's room. I mean there were three or four rooms to pass. Was Bergami's room on the sante story with that of her Royal Ilighness?—No ; her Royal Highness's was on the same Boor with all the Household. I remember going from Tunis to Utica. Iltr Royal Highness went to the Palace of the younger Prince, called Label'. Witness was on board the polacca during the voyage. There was a most complete separation be tween the part of the polacca used by her Royal Highness and suite, and that used by the Captain and crew. The Cap tain had no duty to perform in that part of the ship which was occupied by her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales, I nevt r saw the Captain in that part of the vessel. I recollect our landing at Ephesus. Her Royal Highness slept on the Plains of Ephesus. She slept under a shed : the shed was open, and the suite slept around her, myself among them. We dined on that day in the church-yard, under the portico of an old mosque. 1 am convinced we all dined together. In what way did her Royal Highness travel from St. Jean d'Acre to Jerusalem?-0n an ass. Is that the usual way of travelling in that part of the world? —They travel on asses, or mules, or in palanquins. How did you yourself travel?-0n a horse. Was the course of your travel to proceed by day, and to rest —to lie by at night ?—lt was. In what manner did her Royal Highness rest during the day? —Under a tent. • observe whether her Royal Highness, before she lay by for the day, appeared to be fatigued or not?—Excessively fatigued. Was that the case during the whole of the journey from St. Jean d'Ac:c to Jerusalem e— es• Did you make any particular observation as to the nature of her Royal Highness's fatigue ?—She fell from her ass more than Once. tee you recollect on the voyage to St. Jean d'Acre any tent oa the deck of the vessel :.---There was. • On the outward voyage did the tent continue on the deck, or was it only put up occasimial I y ?—Occasionally, when the sun or wind incommoded her Royal highness. I beliive you re-embarked at Jaffa on your return?--We did. , 'Was the weather at that time hot or otherwise ?—l'articularly hot. It was July. Had you any cattle of any kind on board the vessel?—We bad ; horses and asses. Were there more on hoard on your return than on your way out ?—There were none going out. In what part of the vessel were the animals kept?-In the hold. Did they make any noise in the night or the day 2—The gene ral noise which horses and such animals make. Was any unpleasant smell occasioned by these animals being put in the hold?—Yes, thete was certainly. Where did her Royal Highness sleep on the voyage from Jaffa homewards?—Under the tent on deck. By whose direction was that tent put up?—By her Royal Highness's direction. Did it remain permanently on deck from the time of your quitting Jaffa to the end of the voyage?—lt did. Do you recollect at any time a complaint having been made by her Royal Highness as to the rate of the vessel's sailing ? Yes, I do. What was that complaint ?—lt was on the return voyage. We were off the Isle of Rhodes. The passage was excessively tedious, and her Royal Highness was anxious to get ashore. She attributed the slowness of our progress to the badness of the vessel as a sailer. I stated to her Royal Highness— The Arroartre-Gantaaa here objected to any statement of conversation, but waved any interference, and the witness pro ceeded. I stated to her Royal Highness, that she could not expect a vessel to sail so well with a tent on the deck. Her Royal High ness's reply was, a as to the tent, I du not care for it at all; I would as soon be without it." What was the occasion of her Royal Highness's sleeping un der the tent during the return voyage?—lt was in conseqtlence of the excessive heat, and of the animals aboard. Do you recollect any circumstance relating to a light being kept under the tent?-1 do. What was it 7—On leaving Jaffa, reports were in circulation that there were pirates in the Archipelago. I represented to her Royal Highness that to keep a light on the deck all night would serve to mark us out for attack. Had you, 1.1 point of fact, seen any Tunisian corsairs your self?—Ye', one at Scio, and another at St. Jean d'Acre. Did you know of -our own knowledge that the pirates had plundered any vessels ?—I knew it only from report. I could have no knowledge myself of the circumstance. ' Di.: you, in the situation which you held, think it a matter of duty to give the advice which you gave to her Royal Highness? did. In consequence of that advice was the light put out at an ear. lier hOur?-=-,liluch earlier. Whit was the general time every night at which the light was I put out ?—At nlnt Or ten o'clock. It might be sometimes earlier, sometimes later. lbw. , many sofas were on board the polacca?—Four. Do 'you know in what part of the ship the sofis were placed? —Two were lashed together in her Royal Highness's cabin, and . - two in the Countess Oldi's cabin. • Was there any alteration made afterwards in the situation of the sof:lit—TA CoUntess Oldi sent one of them out of h e r cabin. Where was It sent?--It was occasionally on deck, and in the tent. - ' What was there in the tent besides the sofa?—Under that •, there was a travelling bed. '" * • Db you krioW 'whether these was any communication open betweed the tent and an y part a Vie vessel below —There was i l a dder *Bid Vant'down Waif. " ' • Th e hocr o forat having arrived', on the MUGU of Berl Gans, the Rouse sajoiumett. w r • r • ' i ~... - ,_ 1 1171 . 17 77 .7 i!IPM‘T 75" ' ,waving their handkerchiefs, and there is an incessant 1 huzzaing and shouting a Long live the Quzzi 1" &C. #c.—But we must now proceed to detail the proceed ings of this day in the Trial of her MA.rzart. They are, as usual, highly interesting, and highly to the credit of the Qussu. THE EIGHTH DAY OF THE DEFENCE. HOUSE OF LORDS. The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Wool sack a few minutes before ten o'clock. Prayers being read, the list of Peers was called over in the usual manner. Counsel were then called in. iesitenant Hanscom was called to the Bar, and his examination resumed by Mr. TYNDALL. - You mentioned in your examination of yesterday, that there was a communication from the tent below. Was it open by night as well as by day?--The ladder was constantly down. Have you had any opportunity, from going there, of knowing whether the communication was open or not?—l have. On what occasion was this?—One evening, not knowing that her Royal Highness had retired, I ran up the ladder to go on deck, and did not find the tent closed. )Vas the light out at this time ?—I imagine it was, but I am not certain. Was the tent a sinele or a double tent 7—lt was the awning of the ship. Dies that imply that it was a single tent P—Yes, with the exception of a partial covering round it. But was there one tent or two?-onr only. Do you know whether the tent was so closed as to be opened by persons on the outside?—lt might be opened from the out side, certainly. _ . , . . Will you describe the opening of the tent?--It was closed u all tents are by two parts of the canvass being drawn together, but not sewed. To go into the tent, it was only necessary to draw back part of the canvass?—Yes, certainly. How near was the tent to the steersman ?—Close after to the mizen-mast. What distance was It from the steersman, as nearly as you can say ?—I suppose four, five, or six feet. Was any part of the crew usually up during the night?--Yes, the watch. One part of the vessel's crew kept watch during the night. Was there a passage on the side of the tent from the after to the fore part of the ship ?—The tent occupied the whole of one side of the vessel. Did the duty of the crew, in the ordinary management of the vessel, carry them from one part of the vessel to the other? Constantly. _ • You have stated, that in the tent there was a sofa and a tra velling-bed ?—Yes there was. Do you know on which of these her Royal Highness reposed during the night ?—I think she reposed on the sofa. Do you know who reposed on the travelling bed?—No, I do not. I never was in the tent after night. Do you know whether her Royal Highness reposed alone during the night ?—I have heard that other people slept there. Without speaking as to what you have heard, . d 0 you know of any other person sleeping there ?—I do not know; I never saw any other person. Do you know, in the journey by land from St. Jean d' Acre to Jerusalem, whether, when her Royal Highness reposed, she was dressed or undressed ?—1 never saw her undressed. Have you any reason to know one way or the other?—l never saw her reposing during the day, and consequently never saw her undressed. Have you had occasion to go into her Royal Highness's tent )iscevlous to resuming your journey ?—We always dined there previous to our departure. Do you not know whether her Royal Highness was dressed or undressed during the time she reposed?—l do not know whether she ever was undressed during the journey ; I don't be lieve she was. State your grounds for believing she was not undressed?— Because I never saw any bed-clothes in the tent. Now you have stated respecting the tent in the journey by land, I wish to know whether, in the tent on board ship, her Royal Highness was dressed or undressed when she reposed? —I never saw any bed-clothes on the sofa. Do you recollect an accident happening one night, by the iea breaking into the tent ?—I do. Describe the nature of the accident, and what you observed on the occasion?—lt was when we were on the coast of Cara mania, there was a sudden squall, and the sea broke over pan of the vesseL In consequence of this her Royal Highness came down below to sleep. Was the accident of such a nature as to call you up immedi ately ?—lt was. Did you see her Royal Highness at the moment of her coming down 2-1 did. Was she dressed or undressed at the time ?—She was dressed. Who were the person or persons who handed her down?— Bergami and Mr. Flynn. Was Bergami dressed or undressed ?—He was dressed. Do you recollect, during the voyage, of a bath being taken by her Royl Highness 1-1 recollect that her Royal Highness did take baths on the voyage home. When the bath was taken, of what description was the tub or vessel which was used ?—lt was a common bathing-tub, made at Augusta, by my orders. Was it of such a size, that it could be put into her Royal Highness's cabin when her bed was down ?—I do not think it possible. During the time you was on board this vessel, did you ever see her Royal Highness sitting on a gun with atrgarni ?—I never saw it. Did you ever see them sitting on a bench, pith her arm round Bergami, and Bergami's round her 7—Never. Did you ever see them kissing each other ?—Never. Did you ever perceive any impropriety or indecency in the conduct of the one moat* the other while on board?—Never. Did your duty carry you frequently on deck?—lt did: the management of the ship, however, was in the hands of Mr. Flynt.. Were you, in point of fact, generally on deck during the day • —I was. Do you recollect Bergami dressing himself up in any particu- lac way with pillows ?-1 do. State what circumstances you know. respecting it?—it was done in derision of the English Consul, who came on board at Jaffa in a gold-laced cocked hat, large cloak, and with a big . . _ gold-headed cane. Was the Consul a man of a pompous figure?—He was. Do f osremember a person of the name of Malt °met, who was on board ? —I do. Do pa recollect a danc e performed by Ifahomet ?—I do. Do Vat remember the occasion when he was first cailed upon to eshibis that ranee ?.—lt originated in a sort of quarrel between this Arab and the Doctir. The Doctor wanted him to take some physic; but 'lllahomet refused, and us ed after wards to ridicule the Doctor by this dance. 1 Y!! 0! Doctor !Ira; with 1 40. 463 !t fl?! PO taunt the Pki - . " t s!c?-11to Doctor abased him for net Wag it, eel ddc wit the cause of the quarrel. When the Doctor came on deck was Mahe:inset usually ailed' —When the Doctor came on deck some one or other of the suite pointing to him, turd to call on Mahometi saying, Dim Dime / Was there anything indecent or improper in that dance Not in the least, more than in the Spanish bolero or the Negro dune. Did you ever see Mahomet performing the same dance on shore ?—Frequeetty. The very same dance?—Precisely. At the end of the voyage did her Royal IrighaPss Itt , id at Terradna ?—No, at Capo Danz*. _ But before that, did any of her Royal Highness's suite land a - Terracina ?—Yes, Bergami, Camera, and I think Theodore ( Majoccbi. Was the vessel bound to perform quarantine?—We were not in port at that time. But, on going into port, would the vessel have been bound to perform quarantine ?—lt had already performed quarantine at Syracuse, and for some time at blessina, and, in all probability, it would have had to finish the period of quarantine, which was not completed, at Messina. For what reason did the three persons you have mentioned land at Terracina ?—lt was to obtain refreshments, in cense sequence of her Royal Highness having been - so long on board, and being much in need of them. In point of fact, was her Royal Highness much fatigued and exhausted by the voyage'--She was. Who was on the deck when these persons went off in the boat ?—Her Royal Highness, and everybody. In what manner did they take leave of her Royal Highness? —P, kissing her Royal Highness's Rand in a respectful manner. Did the whole three kiss hands?—l think they did. Now I put it to you, Sir, whether Bergami kissed her Royal Highness on that occasion?—Kiss her face! no, certainly not. Aftet the termination of this voyage, did her Royal Highness go to the ViUa d'Este?—Yes. Dill her Royal Highness pay a visit to the Villa Barona ? After a short stay at the Villa d'iste, her Royal Highness went to the Villa Damn. What sort of a house is the Villa Darona, a large or mode. rarely abed house ?—lt was a small country house. Was it a house in which any large fete could be given?—. Oh, no ! What was the nature of the entertainments given by her Royal Highness at the Villa Barona ?—She gave none, except to the farmers' daughters, and the persons of the household. Was that during the time of the Carnival?—lt was. Do you remember seeing at these entertainments the wives of persons, as well as daughters ?—The eldest of the farmer's daughters was married ; I do not know whether the rest were, The question does not refer to any particular family. I ask you whether you did not see at the entertainments given at the Villa Barona the wives of any persons?—Yes, I have seen the wife of the Chevalier Tomasini and her daughter s the wife of Professor Alochetti, and the wife of Baron Who was Tornasini?-11e was Prefect of Como for some years. Were the other persons at these entertainments residents in the neighbourhood ?—Yes, they were, with the exception of Professor Mochettl, who was tom Como. Was the Clergyman of the place there ?.-11,e was there frequently. At the dance cannot say he was, Do you mean that he frequently visited her Royal Ili n? —Frequently. Did her Royal Highness continue in the dancing -110 m, or in whet manner did she conduct herself?—Her Royal highness did not continue in the dancing-room, but chiefly in an adjoin: ing room, and came in to see the dancers occasionally. Did you yourself join in these dances ?—tAlways. Did her Royal Highness retire for the evening before the dances were over ? Chiefly. 1114 you ever see, at these dances, anything Indecent or inde corous in the conduct of the persons there ?-1 did not. Do you recollect a aver pear the Villa d'Aste, called the Brescia ?-1 do, Of what nature was the river ? Describe it 2—lt was a stream rather than a river. There was a little water in it certainly. When it ran it ran with amazing rapidity. 140 not recollect, having seen it quite dry. Was it a place in which people would clruke to bathe do . not think so. Do you recollect aae.ompanying her Royal 1-Rghness on hes tour to Germany do. At what time of the year? -Early in March, 1817,. I reeol. legit being at Carlsruir. _ _ _ - . Do yak recollect who received her Royal Highness thete?--I do. The Grand Chamberlain received her on alighting front her carriage s and a Chamberlain was appointed to receive her afterwards, Did her !Loral frighnels pow the greater ?tut of her time at Court or in retirement?—Almost aviaries Court, or in visiting the family of the Grand Duke. Did she usually dine at Court ?—Yes ; or at the blaygravine's, the Grand Duke's mother. Did she usually sup out?—Mostly she sopped at the Grand Duke's, and once I think at the Margrivine's.. Were there parties invited on these occasions , to meet her Royal Highness ?—Always, except on the first day. At dinner, at the hlargravine's, were you, on your way back to Carisruhe, stopped at Charnitz ?—lf, that is the name of a barrier near the Austrian Tyrol, we were. We got into that place, I think, about the middle of the day. , What was the cause of your being stopped ?—We had been travelling on sledges, on account of the snow, and not having passports, the man at the barrier would not take our word that it was the Princess of Wales that was travelling. Did this make it necessary for you to go back to Inspruck ? liergami went back with Captain Bataan to lnspruck, to gtt passports. Do you recollect the time of the return of Bergami and Cap tain Barsali ?—lt was about one or two in the morning. It Was very late. It was on the road to Venice. Did ypu afterwards pass Trieste and Venice on your return? —Yes, I remember arriving at Trieste in the middle of the day. Did any one receive her Royal Highness on her arrival at Trieste 7—The Governor was sick in bed, and I think the Vice. Governor received her. At least he came soon after her arrival. How did her Royal Highness pass that evening ?—Sbe went t, the orra. We left Trieste at live or six o'clock the follow ing day, in the evening. Do you particularly recollect that ?—I positively recollect it —I have a letter about me, which I wrote at the time, and I know the circumstance particularly from that letter, it is dated 17th of April. Was that letter written to a lady, to whom you have since been ntartied.—Yes. Was it written at Venice?—it was not only sent from Ve nice, but it was put into the Post-office there. It has the Voila pat-mark. • Is there any passage which shews that you arrived on the 17th P—lt states that I arrived last night. Cu you, by a reference to that letter, state the day you at '. rived at Trieste?:—Oo the 15th. It is a good journey tetra Trieste to Venice in twenty-four bones. In gang to Trieste, we stopped at a small village, in consequence of something hap pening to ouo o . f the carriages. 'fbe weather was bad. Ido Tr "W. • Itiseg kr id dde watt Ihe 1 &Onset usually called' "one or other of th e met ( saying, Disaa Per in that dance s bolero or the Negro 'Ws ; the same dance on s e g., yal Ifighatis land at 1 VAv lighness's suite land a- 3.Ve sci I think Theodore ( • ted ntine?—We were not Of I el have been bound to rformed quarantine at Ind, in all probability, 1 seri quarantine, which was tier is you have mentioned efreshments, in cense- Iseen - so long on board, elar evil ass much fatigued and fact den evil mons went off in the ody. 1 ' her Royal Highness? miss tech a respectful maw/Kr. ink they did. It gami kissed her Royal you e ! no, certainly not. id her Royal Highness reap o the Villa Barona ? ntol r Royal Highness went was ma, a large or mode. any try house. am fete could be given ?—. n rots given by her Royal him ve none, except to the acct re household. her val ?—lt was. tertainments the wives Rig e eldest of the farmer's ceiv disci whether the rest were, rticular family. I ask Lee rtainments given at the -Yes, I have seen the at tl daughter s the wife of on oPe( of Como for some years. rtainments residents in assn' with the exception of tire D. here ?-lle was there a Th d her Royal Iliflmen? the be dancing-room, or in Royal Highness tha ut chiefly in an adjoin: Cit s occasionally, ant ?—t-Always. the evening before the Per the ytiting indecent or lode- the v?—l did not. villa d'Epte s called the no or be it 2—lt was a stream e water in it certainly. the icy. 140 not recollect ao IRO chnee to bathe Royal Highness on hes COt he n March, 1817, I reed, cce nal Highness there I 'her on alighting from 10 ?pointed to receive her OM tter ?eat of her time at tk sat Coort, or in Irish:Ng tZu or at the Ploggravine's, is 0' * supped at the Grand trine's, of occasions to meet her ce he ffirst . you, on your tray back Si If, that is ike name of a ere. We got into that day- topped ?—We had been ti e snow, and not having not take our word that y l ravelling. go back to Inspruck ? Si sail to lnspruck, to pt ten of Bergami and Cap- D in the morning. It was ll Venice on your return? in the middle of the day. ighness on her arrival at ed, and I think the Vice- IC soon after her arrival. hat evening ?—She went ✓ six o'clock the follow- —I positively recollect it wrote at the time, and I as that letter, it is dated e o whom you have since not only sent from ye- here. It has the Venice that you arrived on the ht. v, state the day you at , - 1 is a good journey from e. In going to Trieste, inenee of something hap- ( 'THE EVENING STAR. LONDON.. - WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1820. THE FUNDS. A great Suctuation took place at the latter part of the market yesterday, and the sales of Stock were immense.- Consols opened better this morning, being done at 674 for Friday's settling, and 674 4 for the November Account. Seven months' Exchequer Bills, including October, 1819, are ordered to be paid off imme diately. This is the first transfer day in Reduced and 4 per Cents. The Dividends commence paying to-morrow to the Merchants and Bankers, and to the Public on Friday and Saturday. Current prices, at one o'clock this day : Bank Stock 2214 ex. div.-3 per Cent. Reduced 664 44 ex. div. 3 per Cent. Cons. 674 1 4-36 per Cent. 75 ex. div. 4 per Cent. 834 844 84 ex. div.-5 per Cent. Navy 103% Long Annuities 17 5-16 7-16 ex-div.—lndia Stock 2174 India Bonds 245. 255. pre.—Old Annuities 664 Each. Bills ss. 6s. pre.—Omnium 24—Cons. for Acct. 674 It is pretty generally understood in the Higher Circles, that at the dinner at Windsor Cottage, at which most of the Cabinet Ministers, with the Duke of RUTLAND, Lord LONSDALS, and other friends of the KING, were present, the well-known glee of— 'Twos you, Sir, 'twos you, Sir, You look so very blue, Sr was performed for some time in a fine style, and with great spirit. During the time of Mr. BROUGHAM'S speech, when opening the QUEEN'S , defence, Lord CASTLEREAGH was seen reclining on the steps leading up to the gallery, with a handkerchief under his head. His Lordship, at the moment, was particularly afflicted with the ear-ache ! THE QUEEN. So powerful an effort was made yesterday on the cross-examination of Lieutenant FLYNN, that had it been possible to .shake his evidence it would have been overturned ; but the more it was sifted, the more firmly was it established. At one time the witness, labouring under indisposition, seemed inco herent. respecting " the original" of the document from which his short abstract of occurrences was derived. In fact, it turned out that he had two originals in his eye, the one " the private log-book," as it was called, written in bad Italian, and the other the copy made by Pascuzw. The original of PASCUELLI'S copy was the privitte log-book—but the abridged extract which he held in his hand was written by SCUIAVINI, from Lieutenant FLYNN'S dictation from PASCUELLI'S clean copy; and hence, when the paper in his hand was spoken of, he con sidered PASCUELLI'S copy as its original. There was no contradiction in the evidence when the facts were fairly elicited. The evidence, in contradiction of BERGAMI having slept under the QUEEN'S tent, was equally established. He could say, positively, that BERGAMI, in the voyage out, slept iq the dining-room—because he had opper—, 'unities of seeing him there—but he could not swear positively to his sleeping there on the voyage home --because he had not access to that room in the night. He swore, over and over, that he never saw him under the tent during any night, though he had fre quent occasions to lift up the canvass and look in ; and light enough to see every one in the tent, had more been there than one ; yet was it attempted to make him answer this question :—" How was it that, when you had so strong an impression on your mind that Bergami did not sleep under the tent, you did not prevent the necessity of calling on you so y , often on the subject, and say at once, that you had no doubt he did not sleep there?"— We ask, where was " the necessity ?" Had not the witness over and over stated that he had never seen him there ; and his belief that he never slept under the tent? Besides—no question to which he could have given his " no doubt" had been put to the wit ness. We say that every fact sworn to by this wit ness in his examining in chief, wa! only the more effectually established by the severe cross-examination which he underwent. See an illustration of this in the particulars respecting the bathing•tub: it was too large to be got into the QUEEN'S cabin ; from the way in which the bed and sofa were placed ; pot above one-half of it could begot into the cabin, CARRINGTON'S cross-examination was highly cre ditable to him, and highly satisfactory to their Lordships. This day being appointed by the QUEEN to receive Addresses, the streets are crowded with Processions and people. That of the Benefit Societies was most splendid, and conducted with a degree of decorum highly gratifying. At an early hour they were as sembled, to the number of fifty-three, in Lincoln's Inn-fields, where they were arranged, with their Stewards and usher Officers, their standards, and as many bands of Ousic ; and between eleven and twelve o'clock, were all on march down the Strand, deco rated with white cockades, towards Charing-Cross, where they are to fall in with other processions, on their way 'to Brandenburgh House. To pretend to describe the processions in carriages, this day, would be impossible. The greater number of them were open carriages and four, with the postilions dressed in silk uniform jackets, and wear ing white favours. The carriages 'sere almost innu merable, and the compnny all well, dressed. The day has proved most favourable, which has I increased the splendour of the and filled the streets and roads with thousands of pedestrians, tQ I witness the scene. All the . windows along the line of the procession are filled with well-dressed females, ..Rr....~. T ~.•~