Star. — London, England, 1827-08-07 00:00:00

" , , r ; . . • •- . - ' . ' . --- '7 77 . ~ - - . . • • ::' • . s - • • t ' N ,11 ' ::' •• - . • • - - . . . . • . . • . a. , . , . . . . . . . k tl4. •.\.r ' • r . nib Ticrtdrt t 'l — . - -:-. 4 *=: , ...• .- C . 31 . P.• 4 '4 - - • . •7.10:- -4 4* • 4: . 1 ( )S . ', i 'l `. t. • . % ‘dociliki • . • r . . . I :. .. • ' . . • TUtSDAT EVENIN* G, AUGUST 7 1827 . , • [pmcz Si Noma-42431A „/ 0 4-)t 4 Isl. •/ a 2l •• •-” I"—= ‘" i gc t y—tt Attending at Ynet tege an estraetur 2 ona will of old E.Barker,lscr.There coidd be littintlau tt l that old Mr. Barker was meant bete i especialy as there , book, was another entty in the same by which it ap peared that Mr. H. tinker paid the attoiney's charge fOr this journey to York. His Honour th en declared) the bill dismissed, the plaintiff paying Aosta aabse quent to the putting in of the answer. BALL AGAINST SALL. These parties have more than, once appeared before the public, tbe'plaintiff having obtained a divorce fro her husband by reason ifidgitery; and she now a bill in equity against bini..,playing that tees' Emily Owen Ball, might : iiq caftan out of th of the father, or that the plaintiff might !p -eon to the child, Mr. EbtAnwext. appeared for the plaia tithing, stated, that having discovered an 1.._ don between her husband and his niece, Anise she lek him. and commencing proceedings against s., in the Consistorial Coutt, she obtained a divorce... T . Against this decision he appealed to the Arches Court,. at Canterbury, where the original decree was confirm ed. From that period she bad been wholly revenged from seeing the child, who wtts entitled to 8, standing in the name of the Accoentant General of ' that Court, and who, under her fathkes care, was desti-. tute of the advantages of all female society whatever, the oily female in the defendant's bosse being a servant, of all work. The father. in his answer, declared, that IMO CONTIACTIN6 IN islt, FOR 1,300,000, TON MI NA/MY TAB KIND OF PRUSSIA, BY. jg, 11. ItyTHSCNII.D. IN LONDON. • OTICE IS ElEttEsY GIVEN, that, in conformity With the Genrial Bead, signed by hb Majesty the King of ligunt 5, at ikrtiysh,9lloehof June, 1522, wherein reference `made to the Concise* of the above mentioned Loan, dated the i9h of his', tete, iiioBl4Bog to which a Sinking Fund was pro- OW, whereof the NtilitH HALF-YEARLY REDEMP TION fell dee on Nola- day of the present month of July, his EtcsikneY Baron BUU)W, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister r eD ipotentiary of his Winery the *lnca Prussia, jointly with Air. N. 11. ROTHECA LD, In, the prearece of Mr. Bennter, ,vbtiri Poblie,YNs,M the 3111thestaist, CANCELLED and DE POSITED in the Bask of Reg Aland, aecerdlag ta the form pre scribed, the nidatit of AVIAN la Special Beads of the said Loan, I l iesieed healer, berg the nselety ler the Sum Axed for she Re awlytion of Bands In the Fah Year, via. 1 per C. per damns, end sin the melon of that Wow of thr .6153,1150 redeemed to • deist dad of Jimmy lertleelmlye. Nemberl of 3501/84-0116110 Can3216411"01/11/MtIVF. Dividend Warrants,el4. "1 A. se. 196--.1 /lend of £1,066 '' . . £l,OOl A Nen NM ms roe sr* silo nub ise 801 410 432 41g. 543 SS 451, cis. tin iss—is Besiiiie of /5110 i .19,000, 16 WO 931 tOiS 1111 111116 11193 1911 1164 31174-40 Beedko( £250 . . 4114509 Eits. NO 227 330 462 514 780 783 80, 1008 10118 Val 1131 1310 1330 1867 1388 1309 1375 1411 14211 1126 1141 14330 1141. 1465 1310 1671 1473 1673 1750 1615 22i2 11665 308618 T 1791 •1176 T ma sots sane; 3053 3036 30P6 3118 4147 3116 5543 3663 4657 4688 4727 5024 5037 3036 5040 5041 5198 5241 5317 5318•5316 5557 5581 5411 5412 5441 5545 sow IMO 6243 6,144 8283 1289 1191 6525 8527 6543 6356 7631 1030 4158 8172 8813 8230 UM 8338 3131 3477 • • LAW INTELLIGgiics. 'COURT OF CHANCERY, Avant & COAST V. hams. The arguments on two of these Petitions were con cluded this morning. when The Loan CoatucetLoa desired that the papers might be handed up to him, and promised, when he had carefully examined them, to give, his judgment. Mr. RA wciNGs, on the part of Mr. Coast, then opened the third Petition, which contained exceptions to . the' Master's report. There were sever4l items of objection.', one of which was, that a-sum of TOOL and upwards had' been allowed by the Master to the receiver, for the paw chase and fixing up of a gasometer; and it was also objected that he bad bcen allo wed his claim for salew To the first of these the Petitioner objected, because 'order of the Court had only directed the receiver to pay . the current expemes of the waste; and it ern' efts tended that the claim for the gmemetew Malawi be called current expenses. As the ieceiver had the cadets of the Court, he was, k uri tided to receive his salary ; and the abed a was the payment of motley foe nimbi% Alit, Of a former motion. •,,: . enclaravoot to alienate ftitheT, which was a :declaration that Mrs. temper. Two persons, named affidavit, in which they declared • Mrs. Ball worked berself that they thought it would and that sbe used the most it fendant. Now the fact wa. mach difficulty. discovered II chiki, The p ;31. not en- —so Bootie of 4100 • 317.11. Total 117 Hoods. asoosoning to & . 4921,300 MEDICAL, 'A : ASSU RA NCE S ENERAL LIFE r. JEW ••••• P f.LE 'met nit Lari Len Len Letil Vev.i M. Geer Ger Dem Ise MI Re 3* Res 1. AG Ii ' A A • a 1 I ; 1 1 I • • • Pipasert—liis Grace the Doke ei GORDON, G. 8.0 - of Sillabury he Sas" of But and WeUs The lad of Fife Lad Yheount Gatlin Ltd Vistostot &Word LrJ Viscoinn Clive 71i; Diem of fishery Sr Hoary Haßoni, But. It RA. Sir /Inky Cooper. Ban. I.R.S. Lieut.. Gen. Sr T. Hie Jolt. Bart. G.C. B. IL Bootle Wilbraham, &I. M.P. Thema WiWm, let• Lail Crofton The Den of Whither HonoaA,T DLILVIIOto, Oa VUOITON. The Vet. Joseph Holden rots, M.A. Arebtkocest of Louden. The Her. Cbritopber Beer" W.A. Saxer of tbe Temple. Thaverafx GEOROK PINOLA/ID. X.D.Cwaxax. Ire.atarles Crase, 11 D. F. A.S. M. James Nlacdosald, M.A. Gone G. Bdbingtoo, Esq. Garr !Sabra, MD. Um Ikea, AID. 1.1.3 Boqunin C. Brodie, Esi.V.ll3. ham Carden, &q. War (lichester, Esq. &LP. _BIM him* Cbsbaelei • Kibbierrike,finA. &wand Mertarcemb - N=l4 Sanntel MON lie+ Fantod& L al i =ne, is * Mr George Ashby Smith, M.D. George Vance, 1* Tien It beard Home, Bert. 'LP. LL Bee. George Shepherd, D.D. &►.Rich. Yams, D.D. B.A.S. John Gladatoes. Joseph blame, M.P. Andrew e. attiW hams Kibblewhice, Em. "- V A. R. detbstlat.d, 11443 K1 Nal* JOIPPb &sky, Esq. Bary Rime, Bag. 7 4 Nors' Pit 4l o l 4° B 4 l4 l "ll s ll4 use Prepts.. X 111 , 1161 e4 94 ,441* at i rcenthoth Vilteets - 11 8. ADVAiTetqii 1111 LONGING TO 1. TN addition to the general business of granting Assonant ost healthy lives, eatendlng the benefit of Life inarract to ah dame iif Peruses, instead of I.:audio' thew dined with " Clow, &thins, halation% Pits, complatoti of the lher;ipittias of ski.a,- lad the 00er Dli.sws tsgjllr SPe4t4. A diadolshed Rats of Itinerante, ensechntm the yo'," Loss, ablated en the haproved State of tub* Neal!bi,lFtd the lamed derides of Buoipt Pre ! S. Giving te the Assayed the advamtase,af . sha the,Ethf!thi eldest beteg exposed to ahy risk of lop 4. I:shillalas the Fruits tem . Ffte ,Teeth a ICE to the boatel the epdos o f ke e l % thetas adiei to lb* • for the heat et thu r fisteles4or of talrfoi . thist of their AnroalParestadel Premises for their onn'llioldSlaring Life. S. Noise:sue if lamluna I. required for ry or Naval airsmeept wham ailed tote actual service. .4-ELNFKARD, Residua liseretat7. 905e 4 1 4 1 0 to, OCTAVO ?Vidor we WPMQ444 141 1,0r0m 41 0 41 1partgat LORMIKs bet , FiwAi\ N, is 4 atm tirnet Mtbt, attcrw, Obagedor chrthorpitin. Biked by WILL AU. ViIAY L L3. Pcigted for Henry C9Fivii i ro, S te thrw PatisliPet, ret D iMtn ANTACID LDZAN . telkilog Heartburn, Flattsbere t Ind lop, Gouty and giving tone to the, Etobaseh. O p all th e recent &Korean in Vegetable chemistry, lose has been received by the Faculty with more satisfaction 11 . 4 th , t produced by tii& French Chemists from Feruvian - Bads. , _ 7l,l ftuipbste of Q u i n i ne i s f oun d to possess all the tolls and mortf, Do properties of the Peruvian Bark, in a concen t r a t e d state , :rived of the extractive and resinous matter. It is thus evideote 111 debilitated Sionstells, arising from whatever came, no M. It.te rat be more desirable. • h the formula from which theme Lozenges are prepared. the et lll Phaitor Quinine forms the chief ingredient ; but, that the elects bilte wore adapted to the object for which they are intended, it .72uAleed in such proportions with mild Absorbents, Anti-acids, "Cteeshle Aromatics, as to render them applicable to every htiouting seder loss of tone. chwilaboxes at es. and 4s. 6d. by Messrs. Butler, Chemists, , Comer of St. ?Jai ; London ; 54, Sackville-street, and Thel i rinces.etreet, Edinburgh; fi.vory soil Co. 13d, rend -street, and £2O. liegent•wreet; and by the miners; Z a Trae V, Wens is the Kingdom. Of olsoen may be bad ; DIM ArneVLATID lAISMICIII or CArants6 fee habitat! Son .relatitissu of th e U vu la, Hooriscoms, &c. also a refreshing Mats liessilie r Yield Sports, am. is Wags iielbs. and is•aKtin. • N . D . ItAT.—JIIR9II,IIS CfIANCILWA haying tetierved the question now pronomacedbis decision. H °lista always to be so far indut 4 inkier a will, as to protect hini ing of the bill epic) the putting in the . read 'through the papers in this case, sod, tibtwithst.nding the story about Naney - Nunke , ;ironing round the hay stack, he did not thiUk that the evAence adduced by the defendants bad so much irrelee. iance to the cases as to saddle them with the costs o it. The plaintiff most pay the costs of the depositions. and of the issue. At one time be had been deeply int. Areared with the tact of there being no will forthcoming, ,when Mr. Barker had by so many expressions and :se ffons admitted the existence of a will; but a circum stance stated in the depositions proved that Mr. Barker I was quite innocent of subtracting that will from tbe place in which it had been,deposited. It was the cor respondence between Mr. Balker and the officer of the Archbishop of York, .in August. 1809. ''Mr. Barker Ireishing to surrender a lease for the purpose of renewing it,,this officer demanded to know by what title . he claimed, and Mi. Baker replied, " as executor aid devisee of his brother." Now be did not think that rr , cautious officer, such as it might be supposed the M.O. Atishopof York would employ, could be satisfied wttb this reply, without requiriog a sight of Me, dricuments.' There was al,o a,Mr.A.ntlifipy Thorp, an attorney at' Beverley,, who stated tha& be has( in his lisossessien, *bet bill book 'of another attorney, in which theib Was shirt ussmounset mut ni rt) 111101710Wqr FirII#6 I friiIIIIISOIRS. understanding whit teikastieilo Are :Ttlw,eeille kr4tgasp ma be . i dopted. etaer'e-sitss. , mks SO bee: ;BS of Vogri AVVYAlikto.f.R S. the BAikaisit sod Amber of "Bnao, ,ar...aro. oolopriolog kb T 44 If jca C i on doom!. oas. To , .-0 ' *11 . 111141 . .. aiiij""f 14$ ir*. Of Costs in this suit, . ,o t izott ci 9ossfa. ~ MICR Pk o. Ait i licrpgary 0104 !boo& the court ( , Nica. ; ,,, s , .', c`. 4mq. erp4a.licsetaiid,', 441, to ai party claiming ne"tuthl 1 ' ;:t i r r OP,,,,‘ ,b i IW RA . ilw.. een A lf PIwAIIP cogs, from the 61,4 mauls Earl of 06, , - ---.--qu'l answer He had TI Ito the C°616 0. 111 0 114 .i hil* OnfetAClPl- 6 ' _, ~.. . h d• • • ,•• - -, MI Ez_ firr it st•n If II:Pati00. Mr. Reams replied, that the gasometer was not only . a current expense, being used for the nightly lighting of the Theatre, hat was highly advantageous, and had saved a limey Large sum which had before been paid for and candles, The other charge, he contended, the receiver was fairly entitled to, having earned it in the, discharge of a very laborious and, as it appeared, art unteankful office; and that the objection as to the other payments had nothin4 to do with this. He would men tion, in connection with this matter, and to chew the spirit which prompted these exceptions, that when, in the Mister's office, the receiver brought in a charge for 4501. for an organ, it was opposed oa behalf of Mr. , const as not being within the orders of the Court : upon which the receiver said he would mike it upon himself, for it had turned out so good a bargain that he could sell it immediately foe half as much more as he had given, and so this sum was wholly lost to the Theatre. He submitted that upon the face of this Petition the•ob jections were unfounded, and that it ought to be dis missed with costs. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought the expenses in-' caned for the gasometer was within the description of current expenses, and that the receiver was entitled to his salary; and therefore be dismissed the petition with cost,. WARD 07 TIM COURT. Mr. Crnyo said, th a t the Gentleman against whom he had moved an order of the Court for taking off a ward to France had returned, and was ready to abide his Lordship's order. He therefore moved for a refe rents to the Master to approve of a proper settlement, the parties concerned being willing that the marriage should be proceeded with. The LORD CUA lICKLLOR asked when the Geode.' man was? Mr. Kwussr said he appeared for him, and was ready to submit to any order his Lordship might pro nounce. The Loan Csamoat.Loa said, this person wes under contempt, and he would make no order until he ap peared personally in Court. Mr. KNIGHT said. his client bad shewn his willing ness to obey his Lordship by coming from France, and that- be really did not know the Lady was a ward of this. Court. The LOW) CusticaLt.oa said, there might be other 'reasons for his coining back than his obedience to the power of the Great Seal. It might be inconvenient to remain in France. sis Lordship wished to know If he had made any affidavit as to his ignorance of the Ladjei situation? Mr. KNIGHT said he bad not yet done so. The LOAD CUANGILLOIII then ordered him to attend on Wednesday next. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, ilue. 6. The Vice Cuaacti.t.oa suggested that it would be for the convenience both of the Counsel and of the suitors of the Court, it an'understanding wept atacht that 'ao motion should be brought fbrwarl,idricii Ails not Actually of an exigent nature. Mulligan lien sow out of town, and - therefore little of nothing' could be tie under any order that might be obtained. He mentioned this, because the paper of petitions was very heavy,' and because the seal had unavoidably occupied a gnat portion of the time which ought to have been devoted to petitions. After some cenversation between tlid'tounsel and his Honour, it was agreed that the which his Honour had suggested should the plaintiff had endeavoured to alienate the a,. of the child from him; and that with respect to At.. Penny, although it might look like premeditated hardi hood to say so, after the sentence that had been ob tained against him, yet no such adulterous intercour as that which had been charged against hint in the sistorial Coon had ever existed. The Vice cw.txtozziort..l don't know wheats. It did or did not. He , knows best whether it did, *) 4 Mr. SHADWILL said, the only Court which could take cognizance of such mitten had declared that it had ex isted. The defendant went on to state, that he had not seen Anne Penny for 12 months. Then there was the affidavit of a person named Samuel Cobham, who de -1 posed, that he knew the plaintiff Sarah Bail, and the defendant George Ball; that he was aware of the dis. pates between them ; that she was of an extremely vio lent temper ; and then he went on rather prophetically to declare, that she would exert every means to alienate the affections of the child from her father if she were under her care ; that he had witnessed the condoct of the defendant to his daughter, which was very proper and affectionate ; that the daughter was extremely foud ,of her father, who, deponent was convinced, would do every thing in his power to make her happy. The Vtna-Cuariczu.oa said, the first question was whether the conduct was such as would authorize a Court of Equity to take away the child ? and the second question was, if the conduct of the father bad not of this desstription, whether the Court • . had power to de termine that the mother should have access to her child? Mr. SMADWILL thought the adultery— The VICIeCHANCJILLOR had nothing to do with that, or with the continuance of it, unless it were shewn that Idle father brought his daughter into contact with the improper society. with which he associated. Mr. SNADWIXL was sure that the Court bad Ire. quently interferid between paternal authority and the child, upon the ground that such interference would be more for the benefit of the child, than to suffer her to remain in the custody of the parent. The VICs-Cttaacet.tort shOilld like tb bare some authority hi support of that doctrine. Mr. Su anwst.t. merely meant to say, that in ageneral point of view, the object which the Court considered was not so much the rights of paternal authority arthe ulti mate benefit of the The Vice•Csaatrum.t.oa said it was settled law that the father was the legal guardian of the child; and unless there were facts adduced to prove that the father had ,brought the child into contact with improper society, the Court could not interfere. Mr. SMADWZI.I. said, that one of the grounds of the present application was the.proof of the defendant's im morality, which the fact of his adultery with his niece carried on the face of it.. His Honour would consider that the child had at first been placed entirely under her mother's care, and that now the was not allowed to see her, except in the presence of the defendant, who took every opportunity of behaving with the greatest rudeness to the plaintiff. It was obvious that it must be advantageous to any young Lady of fourteen years of age, that she should enjoy the society of her mother. It had not been sought to cast the slightest imputation upon the plaintiff's character, and there could, there fore, be no proper reason why all intercourse between the mother and the child should be forbidden. The Learned Counsel said, that he should merely press for 'order that the mother should be allowed access to her child, and he asked this upon the ground that it would •be for the child's benefit. • BICEItaIaiSH (on the same side) did not think there was evidence to warrant the Court to take ,away the child from the'father; but he thought there were ample grounds on which an application for leave for the mother to see her child might be granted. It was true that she had been placed at a school to which no objection could be taken; but then she was frequently brought home, where she bad po female society but that of a servant of all-work, while she bad a mother who was able and willing to take care of her. He was sure that this was conduct which his tionoof could never approve of. The VICWCHANCiLLON—There ate a great many things Ido not approve of which I can't help: • Mr. BICIURSTETH continued—Mr. Ball had, in one of his letters, said that he had been accused of wishing to separate the child from her mother, and he then used this exprestion...." It would stamp me as a villain if 1 were to seek to bring about such a separation." Not withstanding this, he had actually, within one month feem the date of that letter, taken the child away from ber mother; plated her at dietante, and in a quarter which the plitiatiff'could not discover without the most persevering and anaious irquiries; and had refused, ewes when she had diteovered where her chili was, to allow her to tea 4er daughter, except in his orescace. adz flialit tOr tow 'was, thus the .pluinuff woitd "le tows. 5),• knowing that she was it. direct refusal when she requeoL, agony which she suffered had been h. the violence of as unsubdeed temper. - A Mn. 'ssiso was present on the occasion alluded to, had tn..- 'alfidaviein which she denied tbeinsultiog langoage tibuted to Mrs. Ball, mad declared that the agony 6f per feelings was such that she (deponent) told Johnsees that if Mrs. Ball were um allowed to see her child, she would in all probability die in the house. • The livacit-Cuttacatzoa said it was perfectly clear t than was nothing in these affidavits which ought M disqualify Mrs. Ball from seeing her daughter, awl he was equally satisfied that there was nothing hefote the Court which could authorise the removal of thy child from the custody of the father. As the Col*, therefore, could not take the child from her father, the only question remaining wag, whether% it *cold so far interfere with paternal antbority as to grant the lutes' mediate application for intercourse between the mother and the daughter? He was of opinion that it could not. Certainly nothing could be more crud--so case algid be snore aggravated, in point of moral fee/ing, thteo to debar all intercourse between a mother and ber' child. But it was not for him to consider she matter its.that light. He sat there as a judge—to act as the-law pre scribed, and not as moral feeling dictated. He knelt of no case iu which the Court had interfered with pub rental authority, on the simple ground of prospective benefit to the child. If any authority could be produced for such an interference, he would not hesitate to follow it. The late Lord Chancellor went as far as anybodir had ever gone in matters of this nature; bet even be had never made any such order as that now prayed, at least he recollected none; and if he were mistaken, it would be easy to produce them. The time of S mith and Smith, in which he bad been engaged as Counsel, very much resembled this. There he had put this pea sition to his Lordship—if the Act of Parliament decteed 4 that an illegitimate child should remain with the mother for nurture until severs- years of age, would the Coot do less in regard to a legitimatachrld ? Mat case, he believed, had been terminated by the death of one of the parties; bet Mr. Whitton was his client then, and he had no doubt that be would give Mr. Bickersteth every information respecting what had been done in the .case. Another case in which he was also gaged was Gallini and Gallinif There the Court was applied to to take away a child from her father, entahe ground that he was a Catholic, and would educate the child in that faith ; but the Lord Chancellor said that the Court had no right to interfere, and declared that the father had a right to educate his child in what Telt. gious faith he pleased. He (the Vice-Chancellor), upon being refused this, pressed that the mother should have free access to the child, but he was not quite sure whet order Lord Eldon made. Mr. Watkins, however, was his client in that case, and could furnish any informa tion required on the subject. These weteshe only eases he recollected that at all bore upon the present appli. cation, but they formd no authority for it. Mr. Panics (who appeared for the defend:in t)sild that Mr. Biekersteth might search for authorities if he pleased. but he was sure that not one would be found. The VICE•CHANCIILLOIR was of the same opinion, and be was sorry for it. Mr. Pms thought that his Hamm would not be sorry for it, if be had heard the other side of the goes. tion. His Honour would recollect that it eras only the case against the Loiter that had been entered into. • The VICE•CHANCIILLOR said he was willing to hear the other side if that would give any satisfaction. Mr. Parrs said that would be unnecessary, as his Honour had refused the application; and he would merely observe that the a ffi davit of Mr. Cobham, who was the brother of Mrs. Ball, proved the fact of the vio lence of her temper, and her inclination to alienate the affections of the child from her father. It had bees inti mated that the defendant had continued his connection with Anne Penny; but there was an affidavit of James Drosier and his wife, most respectable persons, and fa whose house Anne Penny resided, which declared that the defendant had entered the house but once for twelve months, and that was to attend the funeral of a rela tion. It was clear, therefore, that this connection had not been continued, supposing that it once existed. Mr. Ball had sworn that no such aduheroas intercourse ever took place; and although that assertion bad been treated with great contempt, because his wife hid procured a divorce on the ground that it had, yet his Honour knew very well under what an infirmity of getting at facts, like other Courts, that Court laboured which had pro 'wonted the divorce, and Mr. Ball might not be guilty, though such a Court had decided that he was. , The VICR.CHANCELLOK way quite satisfied that many men who were not guilty had been convicted by that Court, owing to the infirmity which Mr. Pepys had mentioned. On these of there was nu proof either of primary or subsequent adultery i and even if I there had been, that alone would not 'have warranted the ioterfereace of the Court. Mr.PAPys said,he ought also to state that Anne Penny... The VICI•CHANCELLOIL-Ohi we have done witbber) let us hear no more about it. Mr. Kama' said, the fact was, that Anne Pasty was visited by the most respectable families.—The sp• plication was dismissed. •••...0.0-- IMOLAI/ *tRDICT. As John Bradley, of Dunamore, near Wendorer, was delving his horse and cart with a load of fagots to Aylesbury, IPaturday sell:light, part of the harness tame °IF, and set the horse kicking. Bradley, in trying to get from the top of the load, he down, and was killed. The Coroner's Jury retailed a verdict ef " Accidental Death, and that the hens Should be destroyed r s ae r the deceased, who was present , ezoh ika a nts foam the dearnetion of property, and was so deep* "it she fable a telating ea. Ultimately en arrulPalookala ntadAt 1 11044 1 .,1te vits. Prtle.#l ll l4ftr 4 h. 'na!lsrpo, w 144 'l f. ~ .- -,-, ^r-T-• IT , .1 ~ ) t. l , •g