Star. — London, England, 1827-03-29 00:00:00

STATE PAPER. MaiSPONDlixtz ARLATIVie TO comUndrAt telma• COURSE lIITWEEN THE UNITED STATES or AMERICA AND THE MUT INDIA C >LONIEE, AUGUST, 18i6. T JANUA RT,IB27.PRUENTID To ROTH HoUllts 01 PA 14 LIAM ENT, IT CoMIEA ND Or HIE MAJEATT,tBf7. No. a.—Atoms ~tariattxt NIS 110 Oa. 811ettfait 041/1101/0. • Upper Seyesour-ureet, Dee. es, 3 tn. the Undersigned, itc. did not fail to transmit to his Government the Note which Mr. Canning, &c. did him the honour to address to him on the 13th of November, in reply to the answer which had been returned by the Undersigned to Mr. Canning's Note of the 11th of Sep tember. But, unwilling to continue a discussion which did not seem likely to lead to any practical result, he abstained from making any further observations on the subject, until he should have received special instrac ti•ns from his Government, in seference to a state of things which wss altogether unexpected at Washington at the time of his departure. Having now received a dispatch from the Secretary of State of the United State., the substance of which he is instructed to communicate to Mr. Canning, the Undersigned, in performing that duty, will, on those points to which he had already alluded in his former Note, have but some explanatory remarks to add. The right of Great Britain, which is that of every nation, to prohibit or allow foseign commerce with any part of her dominions, is unquestionable. That right, in reference to her Colonies, bas never been denied by the United States, any more than with respect to any other part of her possessions; and it is also admitted that she may, within her own jurisdiction, prescribe the conditions on which such commerce shall be tolerated, and at her will again interdict altogether the inter- Course thus permitted. • On the other hand, the United States, unless restric ted by treaty, which ins this case they are not. have precisely the same right to prohibit, to allow, and within their own jurisdiction to regulate foreign commerce ivith thrir dominions, whether that commerce be with the foreign country itself or with its colonies or posses sions abroad. It was not inadvertently that the Under signed used the word right,", as applied to the United Stites lie did not object to the use of the word, as epplied to Great Britain. What he a•tenspted to slew was, that this right, which was admitted, and although it might at airy time be necked, bad no bearing on the questions which had been the subject of discussion between the two countries. What has been contended for is, that since to any commerce there must always be two parties, the mutual consent of both is always necessary, in order that such commerce may at all exist ; that whatever its mature may be, whether of ancient or modern date, whether with Colonies or with possessions of a different descrip tion, ft ma the moment it doe; esist, it becomes a fit inflect for negeciasion ; and that there is no reason is•by an agreement should not, on that, as on any other specks of trade, lie fnunded on terms of just Reciprocity *Rough relating to Colonies, from an intercourse with which foreigners had formerly been, and might again be, excluded. The various relaxations of the Colonial system of Great Britain, as they neverwere, nor could have been intended for the benefit of the United States, and as they were always accompanied with restrictions exclusively favourable to her, could not be viewed as a boon to them, and never were accepted as such. The extent to which the commerce, when not laid under ,too severe, testsictions, was carried on between the United States' and the British Colonies, is an irrefragahle proof that it was equally advantageous to both parties. If einally advantageous, there had been no favour conferred on either side, there was no ground for a pretension by either party that the lasercourse should be regulated by turqu al conditions. Na such pretension had in fact been advanced. The ptoposals made by both parties, during the negotiations of the year 1824, were avowedly founded in a fair re ciprocity, and brought the parties very near together. Usable still to agrre oa some points, it was concluded to suspend the ntgociatiou, with a distinct understand ittg that it should be again renewed at some con venient day. Mr. King was. in ISM empowered to treat en all the subjects of the previous negotiation. He was in structed, in the irst instance, as being a subject of more pressing urgency, to call on the British Govern- Ment to remove the impediments which prevented the exeoution of the St. Petersburgh Convention. If his instructions, on other subjects, were not forwarded to him, it was because he was engaged in discussions re specting that Convention, and it was believed that the state of his health did not admit of his entering at that time upon the more arduous duty of resuming the sus pended imp ci Of this his Majesty's Government appears to have been fully aware. On the 22d of March, 1826, Mr. Vaughan addressed an official note to the Secretary of State of the United States, in which he says -44 I have received instrectirms from his Majesty's Go vernment to acquaint you, that it is preparing to pro• reed in the important negotiations between that country and the United States, now placed.in the hands of the Ametican Minister in London. Mr. Huskisson has been alseady introduced to Mr. R. King. as his hlajes ta's Plenipotentiary, and the Minister of State, having the department of foreign affairs, has received his Ma jesty's commands to associate Mr. Addington, late his Majesty's Charge d'Affaires in America, with Mr. Hus kisson, as joint Plenipotentiary, on the part of Great Britain. The negotiations will, therefo:e, be forthw , th resumed; and it will be for the Goveinment of the Cid.' ted‘States to judge whether, cnn-idering the state of health of Mr. R. King. which Mr. Canning laments to say has been, since his arrival in England, far from sa tisfactory, they will joie any other negotiator in the, commission tith him." The President did deliberate on that friendly sug gestion; and the nomination of a person to be asso. ciatcd with Mr: King was contemplated, when a letter from him, dated the 21st day of March, desiring per mission to return, was received; upon which, the duty of renewing those important negociations, devolved, to his great regret, on the Undersigned alone. • His instruction[ were of a character authorizing the hope that their result would be satisfactory r his de -palate was hastened i on his arriiral in England, the Order id Council of July last had already been enacted. lade .d, it appears that the determinatioa not to renew the negotiations on the Colonial Intel-tam-se, and to 're plate it ezclusively by 4ets of Pitlainent, Had been taken before Soli,. terS, when . the Acts to that effect Weft INUAftli. • Mad Mr. Bing been provided with the !saute instructions, which the •Undersigned received, they Would have been equally unavailing. • Of that' determination, the Government of the United States had riot the Wait notice. 0 : 1 the contrary, though Mr. Vanghan's communication offered she op portunity of making known the intentions of his Ma jesty's Government, positive assurance was given of its being prepared to proceed in the important netrocia tion.s, and that the negotiations would be forthwith re sumed, without any suggestion tbat the Colonial Inter course• would form an exception. The Acts of Parliament of the year 1825, in which that intention was to be discsvered, never were of communicated. That of the ffrth of Juni, passed only a few days before that of the sth of July, and not spe cially• repealed by it, was not calculated to elucidate the object in view; and several causes concurred to induce a belief, that this last Act was not intended to affect the trade between the British Colonies and the United States, as carried on under the Act of June,lB22. • Tnis belief, and the reasons for it, were distinctly ex pressed in a letter horn the Department of State to a Member of Congress of the 25 h of December, 1825, a copy of which is enclosed. That Getter was published' in the American newspapers; a copy was Emit:red to Mr. Vaughan, and he is understood to have transmitted it'to his Government. That opinion was corroborated by the construction ultimately put on the Act by the British authorities. It was thereby. provided that certain privileges granted to foreign ships should be limited to the ships pf thuse countries which should comply with the conditions therein stated, unless his MXiesty, by his order in Coun cil, should in any case grant such privileges, although the conditioos had not been performed. And the Act was-declared to come in full force and operation, from the sth of January, 1826. It had at first been deter. mined at Halifax, that the port should accordingly be shut against American vessels after that day. This de cision was afterwards revoked, although the condition had not been performed, and although no Order in Council had granted the privileges in question. It now appears that the Act of the sth of July, 1825, (6th Geo. IV. 00.114 ) which contains no repealing clause of former Acts, refers, under the name of the law of navigation, to another Act of the same date (6 Geo. IV. cap. 109); that this, although it contains also no re pealing clause, h understood and construed as hawing superseded all former Acts on the same subject; and that the actual repeal of the Act of 1822 (3 Gea. IV. cap. 44. see. 3,4 q, is to be found in 'mother Act, also of the sth of July, 1825 (6 Geo. IV. cap 105), entitled " An Act to repeal the sevens' laws :elating to the customs." _ _ _ The intricacy of those several Acts, and the difficulty of understanding their precise meaning, of ascertaining what parts of former Acts were actually repealed, and what still in force, a difficulty which, in the casesof the Jubilee, seems to have led into error one of the highest tribunals of Great Britain, may well account for the construction put upon those Acts in the United States; affording, at the . same time, a su ffi cient reason for a having preferred rehewal of the negotiations to a pure acceptance of the conditions, contemplated by the Act of the sth of July, 1825(6 George IV. cap. 114), had it been only for the purpose of ascertaining the true intent and meaning of the Act. Even so late as October last, Mr. Vaughan, as ap. pears by his correspondence with Mr. Clay, was not provided with instructions that enabled him to give a satisfactory answer to the inquoties, whether, according to the British interpretation, Ametican vessels might trade between the r ritish colonies and fo:eign coun• tries ? and whether disctiminating duties of every species beta abolished? The proposition made during the last Session of Con gress. and to which Mr. Canning has alluded, affords an additional proof of the imperfect undeistanding, owing to the complexness of the several Acts of Par liament which at that time prevailed, respecting their true object and intention. That psoposition was only for a repeal of the discriniinating duties, and, if adopted, would have been unavailing, since, not embracing a re peal of restrictions en tne c.rcuitous intercourse, it is now understood that it would not have been accepted by the British Gore' nment, ass a compliance with the condition required by the Act of the Stn of July, 1825. It is nest intended, by these facts and observations, to convey any reproaches against his Majesty's Govern ment on account of the unexpected resolution which it has taken; but they satisfactotily spew that the United States could have entertained no doubt of the continued disposition of Great Britain to settle the Colonial Inter course by an amicable arrange ment, and that there were peremptory reasons for pretesting that mode rather than to legislate on the subject. Supposing even that the determination of the British Government not to renew the negociation on that pohst had been communicated or known, the specific condi tion on which American vessels might be allowed to participate in the intercourse between the United States and the British Colon;es was so expressed in the Act of Parliament as to have required explanations before it could be complied with. The condition required from countries bavieg colo nies was both distinct and reciprocal, Nothing more was asked than that they should grant to British ships the like privileges of trading with their colonial posses sions, which were granted to th• it ships of trading with the British possessions abroad. No regard was paid to the importance of such colonial possessions. Sweden, by permitting British vessels to trade with the island of St. Bartholomew, was allowed privileges which were' offered to the United States on very different terms. And, with the exception of some of the German Stater, those terms applied to no other maritime Power than the United States. All this Great Britain had a right to do; no complaint is preferred on that account ; it was the condition which was required trout them which they had to consider. The condition was, that the United States should place the commerce and navigation of this country, (Great Britain), and of its possessions abroad, upon the footing of the most favoured nation. Had the condition been limited tothecornnserce and navigation of the British Colonies ; had it been so in tended and expressed, as that the United States might have satisfied it, by placing the intercourse between their dominions and the British Colonies on the same footing in every respect, as the intercourse between the United States, and the Colonies of the most favoured nation; the condition, though not altogether free of objection, would at least have been apparently recipro cal. To require besides, that it should be extended to the commerce and navigation of Great Britain gene rally, that it should embrace that intercourse between her and the linked States which is regulated. by.a spe cial convention, that they should grant any privilege in that intercourse to British vessels, not stipulated by *jut leonvention, as the price foi the permission of trading' with the British Colonies, was a total departure front the principles of a just recikreocity. a But it appeared also exttemely difficult; if at all pos sible, to understand what was meant—by placing that commerce and navigation on the footing of the most Wowed nation. If Great Britain only asked to be placed on that foot. ingi on giving the same equiealeat which any other fo• reign nation may have given to the United States, 1•t order to have privileges which she does not enjoy, the navigation law of the United States has already made provision In that respect. There is no privilege enjoyed in the United States, by the commerce and navigation of any foreign nation, which Great Britain may not ob. , lain, by allowing to them the ume reciprocal aJvan t ages which they enjoy in the ports of such foreign na tion, and on which such privilege depends. To com ply with the condition thus understood, tl,e United States would have had no new act to perform. This could hardly be presumed to haw s e been the intention of the Act of Parliament. But if, by that Act, it was intended to require, as the condition fur allowing to American vessels • the privi-• lege of trading with the British Colonies, that the corn merce ani navigation of Great Britain and of her pos sessions abroad, should, without any other equivalent, be generally placed on the same footing with the com merce and navigation of any other foreign nation,which, by reason of reciprocal advantages allowed to American vessels, may, now or hereafter, be entitled to greater privileges than Great-Britain now enjoys, the condition was inadmissible. _ _ British vessels, and those of several other nations, may, now, by virtue of treaty stipulations, or of other reciprocal regulations. import into the United Slates, articles of the pro; nee or manufacture of the countrie, to which such vesselS respectively belong, on the same terms, and on the paynseht of the same-dutiei of ton nage, and on the ca•go, as if imported in American vessels. In every instance the privilege is teciproeal, and will cease with respect to any of thos countries, whenever vessels of the United sates laden with pro dace of the United States may cease to be admitted into the ports of such country on the same terms as its own vessels. Inconformity with the Navigation Law of the United States, the prohibition to import, is foreign vessels, merchandise not the produce of the country so which such vessels respectively belong, extends only to the vessels of such nations as have adopted a similar regu lation. Great Britain is accordingly one of the few nations to which the prohibition applies. In pursuance of the treaty concluded in December, 1825, between the United States and Central Ametica, whatever may be imported into or exported front either count, y io its own vessels, to or from.aoy foreign place whatever, may, in like manner, and on vayment of the same . duties, be imported or exported in the vessels of the other count; y. If, therefore, it was.meant by the condition reqoired that the commerce and navigation of GI CA: Britainasad of her possessions abroad should be gratuitously and generally placed on the footing of the most favoured nations, the United Sta:es, in order to comply with it, and, as the ;nice for perm ssi.in to trade with the British Colonies, would have been obliged-1. To admit the impoit.t.ion of British meichandize in Briti.h vessels, on the same terms, and on paynient of the duties, as if imported in American vessels, although the Convention of 1813 !should have expired, and vie corresponding privilege was no longer allowed to American vessels in Hellish port.'.-- 2. To admit the iMportation, in British vessels, of the produce of evely foreign country,. al. though the impottatnin into British pits of the like produce in Ammican vessels should still be prohibited. —S. If the condition was intended to apply to privi leges granted subsequent to the date of the Act sif Par liament, to admit the impo:tation of such futeign pro duce in British vessels, even without being charged with any discriminating duties, and generally to allow to British vessels, a ithout reciprocity, all the reciprocal advantage , to which the. vessels of Central Asirmioa are entitled. 'll this was not the intention of the Act of Parliament, if the words " commerce and navigation of this coon try," were meant only to include the circuitous inter course, the expressions used to convey that meaning must be admitted to have been much too general.— This last interpretation has been suggested only by the observations that have ()mated in the course of Mr. Canning's correspondence with the Undersigned. If such. or any other admissible construction was inteoded, the most obvious way of prrvenring both an erroneous interpretation of the condition, and any unfounded e:• pectations, yn reference to a renewil of the negociat ions, would have been an vflicial communication of the Act of Parliament, accompanied with a full and free eapla nation ut the condition required, aid of the intentions of his Majesty's Government en the whole su►ject. The Government of the United States is animated by the most sincere desire to maintain with that of Great, Britain not merely the forms of courtesy and amity,' but to cultivates cerdial and lasting friendship, to settle every controverted question between them upon prin ciples of justice and reciprocity, and by an enlarged liberality in the'r mutual intercourse to advance the real prosperity of both. Entertaining this desire, it has learnt with regret the ie,olution of his MAjesty's Government to close the door against those friendly explanation', and that free and mutual exposition of the wishes and views of the parties, 1 so essential between two nations whose interests and happiness are so interwoven as those of Great Britain and the United States, and which can be bat partially and imperfectly interchanged, if mutual legislation is substituted to negociati.iu and to the ordinary moody of treating. As the - only alternative which this course has left, it was the President's intention to lay the whole cones. pondence which has passed between the two Govern. ments on that subject, including the instructions given to the several American Ministers near his Britannic Majesty, before Congress at their present Session. It will remain with that body to decide, whether the Colo nial Intercourse shall be altogether closed? whether that portion of it left open by the order in Council shall continue so, or on what conditions compatible with the interests of the United States that trade may be placed ? The Undersigned has been further instructed to give at the same time to his Majesty's Government, the as surance, that notwithstanding its late decision, that of the United States will be ready, at Washington, or at London, to treat of the Colonial Intercourse, whenever it may be the desire or inclination of Great Britain to negotiate on that subject.--The undersigned, &c. ( 111 0 2 01) LIII:RT LI k ATIN. The ltigkt Ilea. G eorge Casaba, &c. -LAW INTELLIGtRCE. COURT OP CHANCIRY, Yearn es. to Irma warren or rite ioaesaterTla UK. The Lows Cumseet.i.tia said. that be had read the pawn i n thii ' cue nail he ws stilton blind, add still be was at a lOU to know what the real question in the emitter was. Mr. Mortara said It was elattly after t , 64 been declared dear and itoinputabie.isankrupt law that one parti es : could not prove spinet the separate east* or shather pastn er mit after all the joint creditors had been paid, eat partner , mad the put In • daitn against his tanner's property, Ne d h ave a dividmy reserved upon it ontal after it tries knows wheditr dr not livid creditors *mild be paid in tall, without being cangelled to Lao rettottrao to that dividend ? After a few observations at the Ss; ilia Lotman. said, that cow that Ie toolinsitat the poin t f„, hk decision was. he would again loot oast tie macs, and uat . L . 4 , opinion on Saturday morning. Ortaa-doVst. —c *atl.R Watital. Mr. &Mew said, that his client bad found it laminable vihr,,, the other side to any arrangement, and he felt kimw.l necessity of drawing his Lordship's atteritikm again to thi.t o e „t the manner in which theplaiutlbasbeen tied up was presia ist . • destruction to the °pets 13 , •use. as well as to all pa:Le. int Mite. in it. The ulterior part of the present rodeo iris, th 4110 1 , „„.. thin. mad. by the defendant utdbt be dims:ivied with sot., sod the. the canoe might immediately beset down for hearing, His Lonnante deified Mr. Sogden to tale an order accord - to the latter part of the prayer, the eth.r sid e aid kg. within ten days comply with the of prating in an amen, it z , upon the payment of all cont. ValVll.lllolll 0# SUMIONI. 31r. Kamer, shortly after. tits riga/ of the Can, stated that a' client of his who had been attending the Court iu csaa leee „ al his caste Whig set dews fat lansim that day, ha l hem trellt4 upon sivikpraerts, when creeds, Lincobirido.striare, se hi, e „. directly frees the Coot to his MINN He dierefere appli e d to a. Lordship se mead to Mai ail ragetka so which, tini er , nth circanistaases, the stal= g 2o Leadaldp's Calift WIRC entitl e d, by unisehlg theta te be forthwith. The Less CNA:smuts *aired if the Alto who had made th e attest was In attendance ? • Mr. Ramie said he did 01411/11 hies fa C e s r t , bit *On of the application, whistle was email 411, allay* id the aim fact had been served upon Mal hall II beet ma, mad Ids residence siss Clancerplane. The Lem Cassnimas jammed VD male to the appladon, hat told Mr. ICiaht to !deaden is at the Mai of the Con .Wbss W r rose, Be dbeeted Mr. Elliot Le mad list' ID ide pleas reeds. --• ADMIRALTY COURT, MAROS it its oastris."--csa sat dolt a arm In this case Lientenant Low, ot his- Maiesti's ship Titian; claimed to Mare the usual bowl fit the capture of a Spanish' brigantine, named the Orestes, Which emaMtoed 265 sloes. It appeared that the [lntim was ordered by Admiral Halstead; who commanded on the Jamaica statism to cruise elf the island of Cuba, to prevent piracy and dams trading, ks company with the Lion. The slave vessel was attacked by the Uinta, but esstared: by the Lion, and it was cootended that the rapture was Nude who the former vessel was out of sighs,aod therefore bad as right is data Lord Srovriu. said be would not give any decided apinkooll the ease until be looked through the papers; but his present spiam was, that the party claimiog to share, as joint caps er, was not likely to establish his claim. POLICICINTEn. IGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. Two perammaether sod eon residing io nuking, we charged with deserting &het; wives. The Parhk Odor. wet chi. step on acomon of the lawnerality of the parties, who was each keeping a mistress. The son. who b a Fabling, said be ter. rattily weld not make It comfortable to live with his wife, bet he would aßew her a maimenance if *le. were kept in the workhouse, as be feared she was living with mother man—at lean, he hail every reason to believe se. The Mews replied they had no reason to bairn se; tad lie Loam MArea refused to order her incarceration; ma i m therm. trary, threatened to coma* hiss, sales. be repaid what she PAWL bad espended, and make bier am aliewmine for the Mere ; tewhith terms tier defendant acceded. The accotti defen.lant gm at upon the sums condition, atm complaining that his wife and ma hail ruined b 110 W . It RIM I Yesterday the .Rosennod Joh, AIN* was brought from Orion. well, harder to put in bail to sowrer the s►args of indecentte multi% two girls, the particulate of width were given in the STA% of yesterday. Frederick Jahns, da.piato worker, of I Se, Drury. hos, and James Butt, of Y, Little ihrostile, Holborn. shoe maker, were hies aunties; and he was est at liberty, to the great if of many of the female port at bts tuagregatioo, who crowded dm avenues loading to the 011 he, and who gave no credit to the charges preferred against Mira. TRAIIIMPOLICR A Casino sr Jawaan — Lort—Yesterday a respectable Jew Jeweller was Gluey riming-el at this Office. It appeared that he bad sold a diamond to another respectable Jeweller foe £llO, fie which he bad himself mild about X7O, to a pencils whom, from 11,1 appearance, he suppoorehte be the Mate ad ao Indiaman. the diamond formed part of a casket which bad bean slopped for In dia, lint nerver reached its destiaation.—The jeweller, alter hawing banismaillind. was permitted toss is seareirot the pencil fees idiseliM Mil purchased the diamond ; but. all his efforts were is vldtt t 11111 d It appearing that le bad dims every thing in bls power to diolior the man, be was diode/god, upon a pianist that oa the Yffilleffilli,ffie ship flan India, las *mad use every sienna to find outdo prate from whom he had purchased the diamond. LA 111BITH-STIERT. _ T.Daity, and 7. of the Coon hOillo. were charged with wantonly robin an old Gentleman over two /Lb and oyster stalb. Tbs rehouses said it wee only a lark add the Perish (Micas had locked shoo or free spite. becalm their engine was first at a recent fire Ms. HalDWilit ordered due to pay Ste. toe Ashler. to the waren by it. on an default, be weld send them for a month to the Mill. TOWN-HALL. Show ilhahusld, wife of a repealable trodesonn,wasdulTid with Whig Aro& sad creel% a ties abed time haw of he bur hod. The ilehoiant was In the receipt 41" 6d. per week as a ,supwate wullosonsace being more than twice On sum ordered by dip Maestro...ad this was raid tober in daily pubes ;batik basted ow hobs le week's meary in one psyrneni, b e d hoe busband's hose in • state olvienekensess. She wasso Ate hdlg droalt.wbick .at Wag aMa tory. 'Owe sot to de Borough Cnorter. MANKIND. At Niktbrargh, so the um ult. Sr Thomas Woohmoo inani of Weillogitalk la tit sooty of Nottingham, Dart. to Miss Nwl Nuplimnia Itaamatbehhot dustbin of theism W.. Rummy, Not DIED. At DeErse, near Habil°, Limemant Adam Ward, of thi BiJtl Hone Artillery. ' Marsh HP, as Demme, he the county of Harry, in the 7411 1 1 01 of his age, the RIM Qualm Colthant, Rector of the Perish If Desertmardn, end Cisplain to the late Earl el /kistek mop At tComo, at a very shimmed sgq, the ceielwated Natural Fano sorbet., Volta. His funeral was attended the moat distinPi 4l4 personages is that place and eke The 14th inst. taw a bag awl anweillows, bash Jaw,tiantb• ter of Mr. Ames, of dale Theatre Uri, Dinhesgh. Whaffralisik, )lira adosill, wool 100 yews and tie 0004 * In 1741 she lived with but fat!" Ralph Swam at Forrest being dm shoat H II year of age, and the rebels In inorloC soutbw mi paid them a vide, and resoled themelms with what they fogna wpm the premises. On their nays, after being defeated at Pres ton, they were rather in a bp, kiss closely premed by the Eng lIM trove, and ea this side of Fuetest Hall, by the old toad there was rather a sharp hill, at the homes of which they left • as aT cart, which fell into the bands of Ralph Berm and others. n this was found a piece of stoat ticking, spun round from the *not boa 1 it was made into a hod es which Mrs. Daingill has skit ever since. MAILS-1 DubMIL DM 011 1 0 Waterfall 1 0 GJ.rnasy and Jersey 0 0 Lisboa 1 0 °seasbsdee o &kenos Ayres 0 1 Hisiaad I 0 HIS DA]. MIL Des Frame 1 0 Hamburg 0 3 Flanders 0 0 Sweden 0 I Braid' 0 0 Jamaica 0 0 Leeward lalamb 0 0 H I ti H. %V ATKA at LUIV Maiming Mimeos DOE TO 110KktUVI. 4S olautes after 3 allatutes after 3 nelson: Printed and Published by Josut Nevin, tit ?reprises., at the Sees °rises. Nu. I, Pickett-place, Teenyle-Bar. . • A 1 Vim Sir go; at CA •3 1 • • Cto Sep wbo I nn MIN Es, fir 1/1 1 / 4 • 1 011 our Bak sa i doe foal dab tidal trii tkal I 6 111 I • • • A • • /111 es, str lie let r • • 1 • • 4 • A s- re i- 1. ; e W Ted 1 V I. J"