Star. — London, England, 1827-02-28 00:00:00

, in foriethey paid-leo dear for it. He was much !she cobnl, to , keep the institutions of but, if laws wanted reform, it was the Legislator to endeavour to do something to amendment. Nothing had done so I as the dictum laid down by a popular laws. 11 was laid down in Blackstone 's' that in fete nature there was no property lion -he denied. The ancient common law allowed every man full power over the game land. The principle of the common law said, let every man enjoy the game eE his own_land. It was property, and considered furl, until the 23d if Charles the Second, when the reat altera'inn took place. Qualifications were imposed, and the re: straints followed which at the present day were these's. ject of so much complaint. He kne w a great number of persons who held that the laws in existence were the only means of preservirio game; but he was convin • from due consideration of the subject,thet if they allowi# the sale of g ame, and abolished qualificati o n s, much gond would ensue. The Noble Lord stated the law with res. to qualifications. He knew he was addressing Peers and landholders in England, Ireland, and Scotland, and most of those Noble Peers were ignorant of the penalties, they themselves and their sons were subject to every time they went out g o sport. Every titee they went shooting they committed trespasses, for which they were liable to informations, penalties, and actions. The Noble Lord proposed in the Bill he should seismalt! to the House, to say, that no man should trespass on another man's lapd with dogs or' any other thing.— He should be warned of, and if he did not go, be should be taken before a Magistrate and convicted forth with in a penalty. He wished, not only to do away qualifications, but to guard against trespassing. The lows bed forbidden the sale of game. but it was sold, a would be sold. He did not see Why the Alder. man's table should not have game as weß as the land holder's. He should propose to enable the Magistrates to issue licences to the sellers of game. His object was, .i . O shew equal justice to all. 'There was another part of this subject which required attention: he al luded to persons who went out at night to poach. The feeling of thi country was not in favour of the game keeper, but the poacher. It was said the law is unjust, and why should persons be denied the use of game, merely because tbeir,property vent not agricultural...? If the law excluding pa i i‘m j s ant Manufacturers i , 'The fair use Of game was utoto',ltought to be re , 'The Noble Lord had, therefore, a Bill to lay on ,tela iptituled An Act to amend the Laps readies 1 the n -Preservation of Game in that Part pf the Oosm Kingdom called England. The effect would be the repeal of the 57th of the late King, known by the name of Mr. Banks's Act. Thet :unite was trite. The ob. jeci of the 13iff before the House world he to remove the temptation now held out to poachers. lf, after game was made property, liable to be sold like any other comthOdity, poaching was carried on, the offender, for thy' Ara offence, would be subject to the months' imprisonment ; • for the second, six months ; for the third, he was liable to be tried f r felony, and subject, on conviction , to transportation. In all cases what attar;4 were made oa gamekeepers, the **niers would be liable to indictments for felony. These were the provisions to be submitted to their Lordships, and Lord Wharncliffe entreated a patient examination of the Bill. It was not a matter taken up in haste, but the result of long investigation. The measure did not come from an enemy to field sports, but from one who delighted in his dog and his gun—from one who was desirous that their Lordships, as Peers of the Realm, should stand 800 the view of the public with respect to rights and laws for the protection of property.— The Noble Lord concluded by moving the Erse reach i ng of his Bill. The Earl of MALMESBURY returned thanks ns the Noble Lord for the manner in which he had intro duced that important subject to their Lordships. Ha °illy wished to make a few observations to correct e • wrong impression which prevailed. He denied that Poaching arose from the state of the Game Laws: it proceeded chiefly at present from the want of employ ment of the poor. The Game Laws had (misted nearly two centuries, and it was only of late Years that offew.M andconvictions for Poaching had so considerably in creased. The comfortable state of the prisons might also'contribute to augment the offence. He had had ri proof of that himself. A man had shot a pheasant ip his park, and desired the Keeper to inform the Ma gistrate. He (the Earl of Malmesbury) had spokep to him, and received this answer, " I have done it on purpose, in order to be sent to jail. The w aters are out and I cannot go to my employment without' walking eight miles, and the parish will not support those who can get employment within eight miles.", He (the Earl of Malmesbury) did not of course 'send' him to jail, but the man's wish shewed the light in which , prisons in their present comfortable state were viewed by the poor. As to the rich Fundholder or Commit. Wel man being deprived of all qualifications for shoot.j ing, it was always in his power to procure one by pur chasing an estate. He wished the country to be set right on the 1 oint that the increase of crime did not arise from the state of the Game Laws. The Earl of HARDWICKE said, that the present in crease of poaching did not arise from the state of the country, but of the laws. He also said, that the House was much indebted to the Noble Lord for the manner io which he hal opened the subject. Lord TEYNHAM maintained, that it was taxation which had lowered a great p otion of the British popu lation ; and gave notice of his intention, at some future period, to move that the State of the Labourers in the Country be tat en into consideration. The Earl of CARNARVON also thanked his Noble Friend for having brought the question before the House. He regretted the loss of a similar Bill two years ago, aid - hoped that the present was the same in substance. No good could fie done till they had cleared away the lumber of qualifications, and set the tight of every man on an intelligible footing. lie approved of the proposed graduation of punishments, and especially of the demand for aunties, by which, as there was " honour amongst thieves,* he conceived that poachers would feel themselves effectually booed to abstain from depredations. Viscount CLIFDEN regretted that the Noble Lord had not introducedirehis Bill athuse to prevent the use of those murderous Instruinents, spring guns, which ge nerally shot any body but the poachefs. • The' Marquis of LANSDOWN joined cordially in the general sentimens or respect and gratitude for the pains which the Noble Lord had taken, and for his hiving introduced the subject in 'such,a Manner, as, whatever might be tbe'ult•maie result, to insure iis full discessiodduring the cowse df the • Session. He was anxious to shew to their Lordships that the offences feelings of honour in the lower classes, which were a greater _security against offences than the severity of denounced punishments. The' wan then mod a first time and, on Lord Wllhas. curres modes, on/4mA for a second reading that day fortnight. The Dlsrynia d LANSDOWN moved for Returns of the .fiftintber of Cooasitmta and Charges in every town of England and Wales, In 1818,1811 1812, Inelwilve, sad In 1824,182 5 , and 1 1126 ; and for shollat Remus with respect to Scotland and Ire- 11110.--.VIOINVU• The Noble hisaiwiss than moved, that a eaessage be sent to the House of Commons for a Copy of their report on Labourers' Wages.—Ordered. Adjoutuad at Sivritm u'CLocc titi Thursday. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Moue was occupied until nearly lire o'clock in WWl* far a C,onunittee an the Peoria Election Petition. The following ue the names of the Committee : Sir W. H. Pringle, B. Handcock, G. Leigh Beck, IL J. Face, &r G. Fethorstooe, P.; Van Boucle+, Sr W. Heathrow, C. N. Pannier, L. W. Beck, Sir H. Cooke C. Belier, J. Bastard, C. B. Turner , Lord Abhor', Lord G. So:Dorset. _ _ COAX tress. Mr. C. CALVERT said, he held in his hand a Pe- , tition signed by a great number of his constituents. The Meeting at which the Petition was agreed to bad ' been attended by no less than 1,500 persons. The Pe titioners prayed for Retrenchment and for a Free Trade in Corn. He fully concurred with them in these sentinients. He felt convinced that the late and present distress did not arise entirely from the Corn Laws, but were in a great measure to be ettribetefl to the bur then of taxation. Sir R. WILSON supported the Petition. It was the wish of his constituents, that all the great interests of the country should prosper ; that the agricultural should not be sacrificed to the trading or manufactur ing, or an undue preference given to the corn-grower. Their object was to do justice to all.—They wished to see competition in the Corn-market. For the purpose of supporting the Agricultural Interests, they did not think it essential that all money .which came into the hands of traders and manufacturers should have the corn stamp on it, or that corn should see a high price. They prayed for economy, but not such a parsimonious kind as would preclude the Nation from fulfilling its engagements 'or supporting its bonour.—The Petition,' which was from the Borough of Southwark, Was read and ordered to be printed. Mr. Pawn, of the Seal Mee, presented a return of the masher of ILleoperies wiled during*, last sewn wars. Mr. ESTCOURT presented Petitions friaa liAthoid, Chipping. Norton, and ether placed In the County of Word, in favour of Wk Cara Leap. Wr W. DU promoted similar Petition from ilk/, East G kod ether put t s:of the comity of Seism Sir B. NiTCHBULL preiented Petitkosfa eu of the Agrindterse Emmet from the Weald of Kent, Dartt dtd, Dever, Dawdstry, Saadharat, sad ether parts of Kan.—Ordered is b. primed. • (Morel SI DTHORPEpressated timely Peados. from the Apl. adtarlets el the arighipser=edie Otp of !laces, sad frost Alsworth In the Cowry et Sir J. COTTBRELL pummil Saddam is favour of the Cora Laws from the Avieskapilleggipt Ale City of Hereford, ad Commy r allira4a. • —Orderdt Mr. N. CAL ERTimomilml Petitions from various Kati Hertforddiire; in fat iteir Corn Laws. ' Mr. H. DAVIS prealloted i Petiden from the Millers reliant he Bristol and its neVilimoliood, spinet the Importation of Pe. • "" Put Maur . t J. HAY Petitions in favour of the Cora Laws. Preen the County of Ibillsgra. and from Bast Lothian. Mr. DU DICOMBIt a Petition from the Ship Dwain of Ripley, in tie Bent of Yorkshire, praying for the repeal of the reciptodtp at Mail Aet.—Ordered t o b e printed. lama:saw LAWS. In answer ,to a question from an Hon. Member on the Opposition side of the Hoose.wbose name we could Dot learn, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he had no opportunity of consulting his Right kloo. Friend the Chairman of the Board of Trade, as to the point whether or not he would be , trilling to grant a Select Committee on the Navigation Laws.— Ifioth being the case, he could Offer no opinion with respect to the mks of motion given by the Member for Liverpool (General Gascoyne). liar. HARE presented a Petition from the Parish of Dr h, in the County of Kerry, praying for a removal of the laws affecting Roman Catholics. There were, he said, in that Parish 5,000 Roman Catholics, and only 19 Protestants.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. C. DUNDAS presented Petitions from various parts of the County of Berke in favour of the Corn Laws: The Hon. Member also presented a Petition from the Farmers frequenting the markets in the southern parts of the same county, praying for an alteration in the law lately pawed with respect to Weights and Measures.—Ordered to be printed. Admiral SOTHERON presented Petitions from Grimsby, Bedford, Bretton, and other places, in favour of the Corn Laws.— Ordered to be printed. Mr. L. KECK presented a Petition from the Innkeepers of Market Harborough, in the County of Leicester, stating that they were allowed only one shilling a day for the horses of the military, and praying for some additional allow-ince in consequence of the high price of provender..—Ordered to be printed. On the motion of Mr. Wooamouse, a Return was ordered of the amount of Poor Rates charged in England and Wales during the last year. Dir. WHITMORE presented Petitions from Etidgenorth and Shripnell, in support of the Landed Interest. Mr. SHAD WELL presented a similar Petition from the neigh. bourhood of Ripon.—Ordered to be printed. Lord DUNCANNON presented Petitions from the Roman Catholic Inhabitants of the Parishes of Callan Durrougb, Tul lough, Preshield. slid other Parishes in the County of Kilkenoy, praying fur a repeal of the laws affecting them.—The Noble Lord . at the same time presented a Petition from the Owners of Mills at Carrick-on-Suit, splint the importation of Foreign Flour.—Or f dered to be printed. but emphatic and expressive tnsalOri in the particular Act, 44 You clothe us, and we feed you., and this is a kind return for both." The admission of foreign Sour 'meld tend, in a great measure, to deprive rat pone of their food, because the coarser part of the amide on which many of the poor were fed was not imposed. Whatever might be thought with respect to Corn, he could see no reason for the importation of fo reign flour. This was one of the doctrines of the new school of economy. However, when one of the great doc tors of that school maintained, that nine tenths of the landed proprietors might be absentees without injury to their country, there was no absurdity which they might not maintain.-11 they acted upon such doctrines, they might rely upon it they would very soon bring the country to ruin. There was a larger capital invested is these mills than eves in the linen trade. When he stated one circumstance, the House would see the benefit de• rived from them. At the present moment third Stier was selling in Ireland at a lower price than oaten meal. Mr. L. FOSTER supported the prayer of the Petition There was one circumstance connected with the capital embarked in this branch of busioess‘ which would beat with peculiar hardship upon the Petitioners if foreign flour were allowed to be imported. The circumstance to which be alluded was this: the farmers in Ireland,l baring but little or no capital, were under the necessity of bringing their corn to market early in the year. For the purpose of storeiag it, the millers were obliged to hand large granaries at a great expense. Now all the , capital expended on these granaries must be completely [lost if foreign flour were allowed to be imported. If the exportation of flour from Ireland should be checked, he did not know how the absentees could be paid their rents. The Petition was read and ordered to be printed. ROMAX CATROLISS. Lord CASTLEREAGH rose, he said, for the L pose of presenting a Petition from the Roman Cathalicsj in the tounty of Down, praying that the House would be pleased to take into consideration the state of the laws affecting them. He would not take up the time of the House by offering any observations on the subject of the Petition. He could not, however, omit this opportunity of expressing his deep devotion to the cause—(hear.) However inferior in the power of giving it efficient sup port by argument, in devotion be yielded to no one.—' He did not speak merely in the spirit of an Irishman, nor should hi be disposed to argue the subject on the narrow ds of benefit to that country alone, bet on the A r a: a broad basis of good government, and Statesmanlike' views. As the'youngest Member in the Hope, those of more expetnance would, perhaps, par don hien for saying, that the aids of good Government could net possibly be obtained while his unfortunate country was suffered to languish in a state of hopeless degradation end abject misery—(Great cheering.) The Petition was metered to be printed. CURTEIS presented Various Petitions from the Collilty Sinew, in favour of the Corn Laws. Mr. PALMER presented a Petition front Waillogford and Its Vicipity, praying that the Hones would talus into coosidention the state of the Wool Trade. The same Hors. Member pemeoged a redtkm from the Donbass parts of the Crassly of Berks. pray* for an alteration In the late Acts respecting Weights and hlssames. Mr. DAVIES GILBER'r brought in aBI to email the Act ',the Wth of his late Majesty with respect to Copyhoid Estates.— The DUI was read a brat time, and ordered to he read a snood tints en Mehday next. IMMO .sac s. M. SPENCE presented a Petition from James Pleaspton, Agent to R. Farrand, Esq. at the late Elec tion for Hedon, in the county of York, stating that die names of the sureties were not delivered in tiU the Itls of December, the 19th falling on a Sunday, sod the Petitioner thi nking that in consequence that he *bold not return the names on the said 10th of Decem- W. The recognizance* were entered into on the 19th December, but the legality of this proceeding was disputed by H. Villiers, Esq. the sitting Member. The Petitioner stated that he had the opinion of Counsel to authorize him in applying to the House for permission, to rithdraw his former Petition. • The SPEAKER said, the only grounds upon which such an application• could be complied with were the death of the party, vacancy of the seat, or new matter arising since the Petition had been presented, and that new matter must be verified upon oath. All the Peti tioner alleged in support of his application was opinion, and that opinion not his own. Mr. BROUGHAM said, it was most unusual to pre sent a Petition of the kind, founded merely upon the opinions of persons out of doors. After a few words from Mr. Seance and Mr. Writs, the Peti tion was withdrawn. Mr. TLERNEY promoted a Petition front the Merchants, Ma nufacturers, and ether Inhabitants of the Town et Emaresborough, praying for a total revision of the Corn Laws.—Ordesed to be printed. WgirrigllN presented a Petition Awn the Zeman Divi sion of the coupty of Essex, praying that there may he ao alteration in the Corn Laws. Alms similar Petitions from Great Driflicld, and from the Eel bermes Agricultural Society, end from several places in Scotland.— Ordcred to be printed. Mr. WESTERN moved for an account skewing the amount of all monies received as dudes upon Foreign Corn, Grain, and Flow, taken out of bond for home consumption, Skate the year 1811, dis. tinguishing the amount in sash year.—Ordered. Sir E. HARVEY presented a Petition against any alteridoe of the Corn Laws, from Saffron Waldom—Ordered to be printed. Mr. C. PA LLMER presented a Petition from Chobitam, in Surrey, praying for the abolition of slavery. Also a Petition from the same place against the Catholic Claims. —Ordered to be printed. Mr. MARSHALL presented a Petition from Halifax, in York. shire, praying a repeal of the Corn Laws.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. H. GRATTAN presented a Petition Roan the Roman Ca tholic Inhabitants of a Parish in Ireland, praying relief front their disabilities.—Ordered to be printed. Colonel SIETHORPE presented Petitions from the Qty of Lincoln, and another place in the same Comity, against any altera tion in the Corn Laws, and against the Importation of Porsigo WooL—Ordered to be printed. Mr. SLA NEY presented a Petition from the Town and Neigh bourhood of Shrewsbury against any alteration of the Corn Laws.— Ordered to be printed. PANIC POTS& Mr. LIDDELL moved for au Account ot the Weather ot Bank Notes stamped in Great Britain, in each quarter of each year, from 1819 to 1826 inclusive, distinguishing those of 51. and upwards,aad those under that sum, stating the aggregate amount, together with a similar Return for Ireland.—Ordered. Mr. Alderman W A ITH MAVpv; notice that he should to. morrow submit a motion to the House, relators to the Society of the Refuge for the Destitute. ____ Secretary nick an observation across the table wbiak IVElt111111{1113:C. CoVILTS or SiWITT. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR withdrew his motion upaa the subjects ,of Equity Proceedings, tel./ming his hope that he should lose no postraneaant, W %al k ammo" 1 . 1 „„, leer. }bemired eke HOLM diet softy • i; ,e 1 be left undone, to melee tbat tie tab& and 6; et* Cowls, should byre redeems feed', ialliedeee bell to tong writhed. CH ANC IRV 11110tIL A !lOW 3 ILL. ASTER of the ROLLS expressed his theist s Member for having given him the would be as short as possible in explaii m ' Is upon which he should move f or l eaver . Bill to alter and amend the practice Chancery. In the last year, the appointed to enquire into the practice in made a &sport, in which they submitted redshems *Adds if mod upon, they conceived obviate the evils complained &olio that it would be impossible _ puspositions in a Rill; and in consequence which then pseseated themselves, ti resertiag to himself the right hag this motion winnower a proper time suggested • did 'figs in mike is allow time for rousidet , IMO* I and ha wad order plepared to state wed liU would chalet many of the existing At that early stage of tha Bill it was not r Mar into a minute particular of its details. aufficient to make it intelligible. Them was faience between the Courts of Law and pars brought into the one were of a differeet to those brought into the other. A Court a tribunal established for the dispatch which any man who Mt hinnelf%ggrieved, ✓ises of debt, had a quick bad decisive Dina of Equity loathed in its decisions 09Pes aad large men of property. .the badman el law and equity fed die toper, la merely watching ever one i ease, often involved the interests of many 14 man more admiral than he the which attended all busies done in a Court c proof of which simplicity was apparent froi return, in which one Judge. sitting at London 'piaster, bad disposed of 3,000 causes in spaee of time. The quick dispatch of business Law Courts was certainly a strong contrast progress made in the Courts of Equity, b should look to the machinery by which the of the Court of Chancery were regulated. missioaas were to enquire into the practice Court, with a view of saving the time suitors. They were sea of honour and had devoted much time to inquiry, had pursued without regard to personal ence or labour, and their propositions basis upon whic h be founded t h e Bill ' moving for leave to bring in. It was or theoretical proposition which be had It was a proposition, the result of two years' inqk which the subject had been folly investigated. Commission recommended that the decision ter in Chancery should be final on cases , The voice of the profession was against The decision of one Judge sitting in his Chamber, Went to involve questions of large propetty, or to be final, though he though& that appeals . Master to the Chancellor, from the Chancellor House of Lords, ihc. was extremely irksome - cious. He would allow one appeal, and might have hie choice of the Tribunal to appeal, bat the decision of that Tribunal there should be no other appeal. The next sideration was that of causes for bearing, was stated there was an universe of anew. say that when a case was set down for ' be immediately decided. It required all , the Lord Chancellor to weigh the separate interests the case before he pronounced a final j was not true as stated that there was a ginwil of causes; the armor bad decreased within years. The illness of Sir:nooses limner , Chancellor, had thrown many cases CAUs delay arose out of the Master's the attendance of suitors was optional. parties concerned were generally to blame in Courts of Law. They were compelled a case when they once began it; whereas they were at liberty to use their own . way to compel activity would be, to empower ter: to act decisively. The Lord Chancellor - be accused of sopitseness; he bad given sioners every assistance in his power, and . wishing to retard their Report. He proposed power to the Lord Chancellor, with the'" Rolls and the Vice-Chancellor, of altering log, from time to time, such orders as might appear expedient. One great evil, which prompt and effective alteration,was the Me commooly called copy money. He rate of twelvepence a folio. This was price in Common Law, and had given that the Master swelled out his own paper I‘. would recommend that this fee be abolished, sonable compensation only given. He part of the Report which recommended two extra Registrars. He objected also of Bankruptcy cases from the Great' seat Bill, but pledged himself to bring Creopportunity a separate measure llion. Gent. concluded by moving bring in a Bill to alter and amend the e aredings in the Court of Chancery. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR said, the Right made oat a very plausible case, on arm the House to throw everything , place in that House respecting the Court and confine themselves to the Report of sloe. The Lord Chancellor, after having tot years refused to do anything, was now frightened an appearance of doing something; but he ( would now say, that the present Bill - to amend the practice of the Coot t of he had •made a great many efforts to .ng in the Court of Chancery under the consideration of a Committee of the House, he at length succeeded in 1811. tan that Committee, however, Mr. Percival took care to place a great Isaiahy of the Chancellor's friends. They called a Master of Chancery before them, but he refused to answer their questions as to the cause of delay, saying it would be a libel on the Chan cellor. He then applied to the House for fuller powers, but they were refused, and Lord Eldon himself told him, that he caused it to be refused, because, if it was grant. Os he would be no longer Chancellor. House would see in this the cloven foot, whi , ' the Committee nugatory, and woe" present Bill nugatory. When Bid was introduced, he (Mr. Tay.. do. After some years, the Chancellor of Lords, it had failed, and asked f , House of Lords s• a Speaker was in a dl alto trial Loominoter. -- • Sir 1F• IND 11.8 Y presentad Potithrs from various partf of the County of Uncap. in favour of the Corti Mr. R. SMITH Presentedlimilu Patitrons . from Sandwich and other pane of Lot. Mr. MASS= DAWSON 'remnant& a retition from the fobs. blunts of Cionairil,4ll . that if: lisfy re Cash imported into Ireland might be t Ordered to'be Pl•Mted: Co mm Mr. e bfOOofRE Pro Dublin. enied .igaier o to, i i. # l . the Chamber of . , rce Mr. H. GRATTAN supported the prayer of the Petition.— Ordered to be printed. Lord MILTON presented a Petition from Cornwaklen, in the County of Lancaster. preithp fer an alteration of 66 Can Laws. Ikkg. was anxious, as • against the Gates' Laws formed the.,arst stage by*** Act of 17110 tits specially except hen% site operation Wyman* by Mr r of the country ; t aftniers arrived sweater crimes. l'oachers, in fast,, of it. In the year 1907, it saw act that harpsisicaa ... l d .do hes Id be t. duty of every conathittil a great atm/ Of &Pot, ff'otn which drafts , flour was frequentltinapoitas imam Irelvtil as 41tillso piton to these c.o. ,g with a view went continually made toil' up the higher department*. amir, in:eceniequence,ef whit* the Corn lutercoorpa fict "aka %b e y h b a to much mischief of vice aad mit. $e had already moped for returns, was restticted to flour, the swarth of Great Miritain.-- CHI writer on the chewing the increase of crime generally and relatively This jaw proved most saint's/ to its effects, Tor it wos The MASTS Ce%goicionrarias,. to offences against the Game Laws, and he hoped that the means of commanding from Ireland a supply of to t h e Hen. Ms ty. That asser- they would be produced before the second reading of the flour upon more advantageous terms than it could be dente, and woi law of the land Rill. He lamented the practice of eking out the wages procured by this country from any other part of the the grounds af e game on his' of labour out of t he Poor's Rites, as destroying those world. To use the words of Mr. Csrattan, in his short bring in a Rill •.. .r... 1...........1,...... .ohteh were a but emphatic acrd expressive manor, in referetKg to Court of Chant inilicsiccsthrtect.sideim ielawL essw enin.:,tezhhtrheisa s eetecacautse: , aaatt . wia7tZ PA& ea it , INPla the eactice is the e Commisti es =l f 1 entais he a :weived would I of. k dale tle to es b edt Pence of s h e s. heehaw' s& fight of repeal. WI. Iggested J ut ', naiderin g s h e able .e that his pm. via ting abuses.— Lora tt nece.sary to wool ils. It would b e serif rasa wide iii• trail' d Equity; the 'te e eat descriptio e Lti in of Law wa s of justice, b y 1S is grieved, a s i t gni re remedy ; i / I . lll _.__ Mt many per. 13111 1 It was un i te e i *a quity to g ek t . Mel one individual C4ls s taany othe rs ._ ON the Smoki ly XII nit Oi Law; a lna t tt from a mom lake adoa and West. COO face business is the . :net to the r std : p ldat RW a r bh i nt.a nd e d t scive ice ille:e 7 e r y nf te H7 : l l : 2 4; t: . asci that iry, which they for onal inconveni. tti t' ions were the II he was thee ras no visionary had to submit. tot rears' inquiry,io is restigated. The sail ision of the Mat. set of exception I t h e dly against this. Chamber, which . petty, ought not ppeais from the 1111 homelier to the . :some and injudi• tba nd the appeilast CO which he would unal once gins, ,ext point for ego- LA! og, and here it an. No one would • bearing, it could I the judgment of arate interest. of aA judgment, but it " a growing artear " :ithin the lest two wo Homer, the Vice- as. back. A great 'a Ps Office, in which 10 1. The agents of Ti blame for delays m led to go through vas in the former 1111 time. The only F avower the Mas- tenor ought not to yen the Commit- a and was far teem a °posed to give the the Master of tbe tering CT ass& 1 is might to ibis which called fat .1 e Master's charges, was paid at the .1 as three times the 1 ea rise to a tart aper for lucre. He solished, and rea• .1 le objected to that I led the addition of .! to to the separation 1 , Seal, by the pre- ig forward at the re oo ttat subject. sowing for leave to the mode of pro' ht Hon. Gent. had which be called g that had tabs • nun of Chancery, :t of the Commis- awing for so many ow frightened into int he (Mr. Taylor) I could do nothing f Chancery. After bring the delays consideration of a ugth succeeded in Mr. Percival took ;bancillor's friends. before them, but Is as to the cause bel on the Chan- .r for fully, morel% because, it it was graut- ancellor. The House K, which then rendeied would sow render the ' the Vice Chancellor's f' ',tor) said it would not icellur said, in the House k ted for a Speaker in the as given hisn ; but the FOREIGN FLOUR. Sir J. NEWPORT said he held in his hand a Peti tion, to which he begged to callihe'particular attention of the'HOuse, on at count of the igricu:tural interests with which the subject of it was connected. The Peti tion was signed by 240 persons who were proprietors of mills in Ireland, the property invested in which was not less than two millions and a halt. The Petitioneis stated that they embarked this vast sum on the faith of Acts of Parliament. These 240 were not one-third of the number concerned in this branch of business. By an Act pa,ied in the year 1783, a duty, amounting to a prohibition, was imposed on all Foreign Flour imported into Leland. When in the year 1806, the duty de-' solved upon him, in consequence of the situation he then held or introducing the Corn In,etcourse Act, the