Star. — London, England, 1827-03-30 00:00:00

i. Elmit not a Lt ectedaid ts -1114 n ought bays been irsig va swim arliament for the borough of Deno that tedlrftk West, F.sq. was duly elected, and ought been returned for the said borough. The Report added, Ilk gaNagAit:he return was not frivolous or vs ).'), %i* gip 'i igts..4 C same was not frivulour or g ei li Tlle I 3 fry rib 01l Crown was then ordered morrow to amend the sal return. WISTIKZAIII ZLICTION iltelTION. The following Members were appointed and Mare tithe . miner to try the merits of this Petition, viz. Mr. John Bond, Mr. C K. Tynte, Mr. John Guest, Mr. Pryso Pryse, Lord Jon Hay, Lord Valletort, Mr. W. F. Scott, Mr. R. Colborne, Mr. T. S. Rice, Eirl of Brecknock, Mr. Richard Arkwright, Lord A. Mill, Right Hon. R. J. W. Horton, Right Hum Leslie Foster, and the lion. J. S. Wortley. JAM/3011'S DROWN 111 L. The Heuse went into a Committee so this Bill. Counsel were heard, and witnesses were examined. The Report was then re ceived. Celli Laws—tz.naa TRAWL Petitions were presented, praying for protection of the firitish Far- meta, against Foreign Corn, and for protection against Foreign Flour, from the Niilkrs and Merchants of Cork, try Mr. H. Hutchinson; front Montgomeryshire, by kir.C. W. Wynn; from Owner, of Land 1 'near Winchester, Aid from the Millers of North and SoutbShiehis, by Mr Ijidell; from Oikkrist and two other hundreds in Norfolk, by Mr.Wodelmuse ; from some parish in Sussex, by Mr. Curtefsi from Ineernets-Shire, by Calonel think ; from farmers near Peterafields 1 and another from farmers near Fareham, by Mr. Flemming. This last Petition prayed, that the averages on which the duty was tube paid. might be aten on the prices of six weeks and not of one. On this Perithati being presented, Sir T. LETH Bill DGB wished to know what was determined (if anything was yet determined) as to the mode of taking the aye -rages; whether the duty was to be on the average of several weeks •or of one only ? He was also anxious to know what day would be tied for the second reading of the MA, which, be understood, was to be brou.lit in this evening. - ' Alr. C. GRANT said it was his intention to bring in the Bill ' this evening, and to move that It be,read a second time on Monday. As to the first question of the Has. Baronet. he would observe that 'lt was lutended to have the duty take* on the average of tbs. weak as less liable to abuse. . kir. CA 1.0 R A FT said, what Ids Honourable Friend wished to 'know, was, whether any change was intended in the mode of Sang the duty? 111 r. C. GRANT said, that be Change VMS intended. The duty would be on the average price of the week the Curs was intros ted. Many persons who were well acquainted with the trade had ex pressed their approbation of that mode, in protector.* to taking an average of several weeks. Mr. Secretary PRIM understood the question to have been left in this state at the last discussion. An Honourable Friend of his had for baying the gm on the month, and not on one week. pressed question was considered to be oeen for consideration, and it had been attentively examined by his Right Honourable Friend, the President of the Board of Trade, who thought that the weekly average would be less liable to tie operations of fraud than any other.---. After a few words from Mr. Cements. Mr. C. ()KANT said t►at, the subject would be better road egered when the Bill should be to a Committee. Tilt ♦WAIT EX INDIA. _ _ __ H r . G wyN N pee notice that he would on the Ist day of May =wee the Thanks of the House to our Army in India, for the bril liant successes which had attended their efforts in that part of the world. - 6011111011 TALLOW, USX?, Ike. On the motion of Mr. Comes, there were ordered to be laid be fore the Howe t returns of the quantity of foreign tallow, hemp, Dal, hides, and seeds imported Into this country since (as we could • hear) 1607 ; also of the quantity of foreign butter and cheese im ported kite England since i tor, with the amount of duty p‘id on each stuck. TES ITATI OF Tat areinusenarson. Mr. R. DAVENPORT, adverting tea notice of his which stood for Tuesday next, said, that his motion was for a Select Committee to Inquire into the cause 'Wag national distress. It was his inten t on to bring it on on the day named, but be was prevented by the unsettled state in which the Adminietratlon of the country was left, ea rather by there being, he inliht say, no Adniiniatratiois formed. Six weeks had now elapsed since the occurrence of an event which bad w serioualy affected a Nubk Lord, who might be cnisasdered as else last rentainmg link that held the Ad • ' , trades together. The country bad a right to expect, in that dose, that an Admiasinsation would be formed, but nothing had yet been dour towards that end. In this unc.rtain stateof skims, be had bergs advised by several of lain friends to postpone his nsutsuu tiU after the Easter hoddays, and as he saw no earlier °peat day, he would is it tor the 17th of Nay. , _ gistrates, to . number . ,asset mined to prevent it, from a conviction of its illegality. One of them, however, a Mr. Johnston. took a different view of the subject. He contended in favour of the lega lity of such precessions, and promulgated his opinion. Sanctioned by his authority, an assembly of many hun-! dred men took place. attended by flags, drums, and all the other usual appendages of such Meetings, and throughout the day the town of Lisburne was a scene of riot and confusion. The other Magistrates thought it Abair du y to address a repre.entation of the conduct of Mr. J hnston to the Lord Chancellor, and after full de. -liberation a letter came down from that high authority to Mr. Johnston, congratulating him on the propriety of his conduct. The other Magistrates then thought it necessary ttrapply to the Chief Secretary of Ireland, to be informed, as the conduct of Mr. Johnston had been so highly approved, in what li 4 ht their conduct was I considered? The answer was, that their conduct was; highly approved by his Excellency the L rd Lieutenant.l Thus there WAS one letter for, and another against, their ' opinions and conduct, and puzzled by these conflicting decisions, emanating irons authotities sn exalted, they', addressed another letter to the Hon.Gentlortopoirequest ing an explanation. To this last letter no answer had been retetned up to the pre eat moment. Was this to be called government P - This inciting of one person in the commission of the peace against another—this en couraging one Magistrate to head and sanction an assemblage of persons, which another set of Magis trates were encouraged to disperse and despoil of their banners. He was not ashamed to confess, that he had himself been an Orangeman. There was not a finer or more spirited body of me.i than the Orangemen of the North of Ireland, but they were converted into instiu ments of mischief, by the same causes which consumed the peace and endangered the safety of the whole coun try. They had a tight to walk in procession if they liked, bus if they walked on the 12th of July other men would walk on other days of the year. The system pursued by Government was calculated to make Ireland' one va,t mad-h sum of demoniac spit its. teady to follow any man who would take the lead of them. Having stated all this, he might perhaps be asked for its appli• cation; but for this he though' it impossible that any man could be at a loss. These lamentable occurrences were all produced by t'.e distractions and divisions of the Cabinet. The Honourable Member concluded by moving for a Copy of the Correspondence be weep the Magistrat -s of the town of Lisburne and the Right Honourab!e H. Goulburn, relating to the Orange procession of the 12th of July, 1825, together with copies of the affidavits transmitted by the Magistrates. Also a copy of the Correspondence between the Rev. Philip Johisscon, one of the Magistrates of the said town, and the Lord Chancellor of Ireland, on the same sub ject, together with the affidavits ; also, a copy of the opinion of the Lew Officers of the Crown, on the lega lity of Orange priscessio is. Mr. GOULIIURN said, that if it was the intention of his lion. Friend to allay the spirit of isatfation which unhappily prevailed is; Ireland s he had adopted a course little calculated to promote his ohject—and. had dis-1 played but a scanty pdrtion of discreti n, its ripping up an old quarrel, two yea: s alter the occurrence which had occa.icesed it: If the peace of Ireland was thintght by his lion. Friend to depend in any degree upon the harmony of her Magistrates, this was not • the way by With her peace could be promoted. Ile would be Able by a very few words to chew the -House that the nclusions sal his Hon. Friend were entitely erroneous; and that, unless Government had take 1 the evidence only on one side of the question, as he had done, it was Impossible for them to :strive at the same conclusions. There might be some inconvenience belonging to a Government coins used of persons of different political opinions ; but he th•ught that the complaint came with a bad grace (torn his Hon. Friend, whose present opi nions were, that the best Government for Ireland would bi one, composed of men (hireling. not only in their p0..c.0 ..c.0 litical, but also in their religious opini.‘ns--(Ile r, hear). He would however assert, that the present Government in all cases manifested yeif.ct impartiality in adm•nis tering the existing laws. He would point nut the in accuracies of the statement of his Hon. Friend, n t by the evidence of one pa ty or the other, but by that of impartial and disitreiested persons. It was true that plevious to the 12 h Jury, 1325, as on former occasions, Goveinment had taken steps to prevent these proces- I . ms, and that an opinion of the Attorney and Solicitor General, pronoun ing them illegal, had been promul gated. There was, as had been stated, a meeting of the five Magistrates previous Li the 12th, when four of shoos agreed to act upon that opinion, and one, the Itev Philip Johnston, dissented. But what was the extent of his difference of vpin.on? He said he had doubts as to the meaning of the Statute: that it did not contain the word g• procession;' and that, being a penal Sca lute, it ought to be construed strictly. He said that he would make eves,. effort to prevent a procession, but he did not make a distinction. He was unwilling to resort to force in the first instance. He recommended that persuasion ►houll first be empllied, and he (Mr. Goulburn) thought he had no reason t , i be ashamed of his conduct. He was a Clergyman, and bound in that character, to inculcate the feelings of humanity; and he was, moreover, a man in the 78th year of his age, who might well be excused even if he had shewn some want of proper vigour, and still more when he had only counselled his Brother Magistrates not to resort to force if it could be avoided. Mr. Johnston had not promulgated his opinion, nor bad he been in the town at the wise of the riot. On the receipt of the papers connected with these proceedings the Lord Lieutenant had submitted them to the Lord Chancellor. That Noble Lotd did not proceed like his Hon. Friend, and condemn at once. He applied to the party accused, and heard his statements and evidence, and then did not, as hisHon.Fr iend had stared, send a flaming letter of appro bation, complimenting him on knowing the law better than theLawOfficers or the Crown. He had the letter, and would read it ; but would first ask what the question was which the Lord Chancellor had to decide? That ques tion was no less than whether he should remove this Magistrate from the Commission ? an exercise of power of a most delicate nature. and one never resorted to in this country without the facts having been first esta blished in a Court of Justice. No reply was given to Mr. Johnston till he had made a second application, when the Lord Chancellor wrote to him in the words , which be would now read t—" I am sorry that you not, in you probation? If his Hon. Friend had been disposed to treat tne subject with ordinary candour, he would not have permitted himself to describe a letter, contain ing such a passage as he had just read, as conveying unqualified approbation. But perhaps his Hon. Friend would prefer the opinion of some high legal character, who thought as he himself now did up-su the question of the Catholic claims. He was able to accommodate him with en authority of this description. On the pa pers coming to his office, he submitted them, as a thing of course, to his Right Hon. Friend, the Attorney- General for Leland. He surely would not be suspected . of being tainted with Orangeism; for, if he remember ed rightly, some pretty warm contests had taken place on this subject between his Right Hen. and his Hun. Friend, when the latter had different views of the sub ject from those he now entertained. The memorandum of his Right Hon. Fs ieud upon these documents was in these words—" I think the Magistrate has given an ex planation quite sufficient to do away any necessity for his removal." In short, the opinion of the Attorney General was perfectly in accordanCe with that of the Lot d Chancellor. They should c usider, not ;slime the interest of the patty applying, but the effect that might be produced on toe public mind, if the House should agree to tire prod iction of these documents. Mr.John stqn himself applied for those very documents, for the ',impose of making them the ground of a legal decision with respect in his conduct upon that occasioi ; and the answer retukned by him (Mr. G.) was, that it could answer no purPose to place them in his hands, as his Conduct had been considered pet fectly justifiable. He should not follow his Honourable Friend throasb the general topics on which he had touched, its they were of too Breit magnitude in themselves for an incidental discussion, and were not naturally connected with the subject. Tnere was a deficiency of one half in his sta ement of facts, as his H's. Friend had brought under the consideraion of • the House one side of the question. lie trusted these-' fore no more was necessary to chew that the motion was uncalled for. The same motives which induced Government to withhold from Mr. Johnston himself, AS well as from the other Magistrates a statement of the facts and circumstances for which they applied, *mild now prevent him from granting the documents for which his Hon. Friend moved. His reasons for refusing them were, that nearly too years had now elapsed since these events took place, that since that time no processions had taken place in Lisburne, and that the effect of the motion, if agreed to, might be to rip up again a subject which must naturally ex cite animosity—(Hear, hear). Mr. S. RICE said, the complaint had not bent an swered. It was most indecorous for Mr. Johnston to have attended that Orange Parade, dressed out in the Orange insignia —(Hear).—This of itself was a sufficient proof of the sort of feeling which had actuated him. Mr. PLUNKETT contended that, this being not a question of Magistetial condo. t. but of the con struction to be put on an Act of Parliament, the L Chanceilor could out have wtitten a leiter different from tie one produced. If, however, it was thought his L irdship ought to have written a letter of aspe rity, that seemed to have been 'species', which his Lordship was most likely to fall short in. Thi•ugh differing from his Lot &hip as to the questi.in of Emats cepation, he was ready to identity with his Lordship in all that regarded his L,irdship's administra tion of public justice. There sta. not an individual connected with the Government, who co-operated with mote cordiality than the Lord Chancellor, to put down pasty feeling in Ireland. The only part of Mr. Johnston's conduct he (Mr. Piunk:tt) did not approve was, his appearing with the orange riband at his breast; but the defence had been that he had stern such a siband the greater part of his life. Sir J. N itt; W POUT said he never regretted any thing more than that part of his Right Honourable Friend s speech in which he identified himself with the Lord Chancellor of Ireland. Mr. PLUNKETT.—It is well known that my opi: niont with respect to one great question differ :ago cage from those of the Lord Chancellor of Ireland, and must ever continue so. When L said I identified myself with the Noble Leid, I confined that observation to the ad ministration of the law in Ireland. Sit J. NEWPORT contended, that if the conduct of the Reverend Magistrate be so upright, why refuse to produce the documents that will prove the purity of his motives? These decuments were the beet and only m-ans of allaying the suspicions and fermetttatinn on all sides, and should be at once produced. The House were bound to insist upon their production, far it was absurd to refuse them on the ground that orange pro ! cessions and their revolting con , equences were melting away. They were told so in 1811 tad in 1824, and yet in 1825 a Magistrate, in defiance of the law, ap pears at the head of au orange tawny in all the insignia of intolerance and irritation. Mr. Secretary PEEL said be should con6ne himself to the simple question, whether or not there was suffi cient Parliamentary ground for the production of cer tain papers? He should pursue the discussion without vehemence, and abstain from touching upon any topic ;calculated to excite irritation. The Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Brownlow) occupied much of the time on the Catholic Question—a most important topic, ne doubt, but entirely beside the present subject. The Right Hon. Baronet (Sir J. Newport) contended, that as there were conflicting statements in this case, there was no way of setting the matter at rest but by the production of the papers. He could not agree that strong asser tions on one side were sufficient ground for granting any documents for which Honourable Gentlemen might please to move. Tne real question was, whether these appeared to be such a prima facie case of blame as ought to induce the House to concur in the motion ? He should endeavour to chew that there never was a case brought before Parliament in which there was less of suspicion, a case which less warranted the production of papers. Entertaining as strong an opinion as any person en the Catholic Question, he had heard no sentiments expressed, by its warmest advocates, with respect to Orange associations and Orange processions, in which he did not fully concut.—(Hear 1) He wished they were at an end, and he believed they were gradually dis solving. He thought much more highly of those who discouraged than those who encouraged them. He would [do what be couldlo repress th: srs by law, and were he a , 1 41 C .1 1 - C ' • .11 . • 1 • 1 A men retuned a • shield of equal law over the people subject to lts hi- bive had the troubk of writing a second leup, ancLed, Denbigh, and g uenc ; e he woold put it down by inspiring them with collecting affidavits, and am gratified in being enabled ought to have respect and affect ion f , i the legal imtitutions of the to state, that so rasp:eta* a Gentleman has not, in doled, that tier vexat ious, an d country. The Hon. Welber said, that he would now 'the discharge of his public duty, incurred any an DT vexations.-- come to the immediate object of his motion. He en• start. At the same time, I differ from you in opinion dto aura/ to. vred into a detail of transac ions which took place in as to the law. Orange processions must be illegal, the town of Lisburne, on the 12th July, 1825. In the inasmuch as they emanate from an Mega society. r , a nt e C onr .. belief that an Orange Procession was intended, the Ma. independent of their tendency to disturb the public r. John Hood, gistrate,, to the number of five, assenibled.They deter- peace." Was this, I, he would ask, an unqualified ap- • • •% I,e• l • 1 _ •• • • l_ _I l— Il • A • Y•YL LAWS. - Mr. ESTCOURT preseuted a Petition front the Magistrates of the Devises Division, county of Wilts, praying (or soine altera ton in the Game Laws. They stated t►at nearly ball the number of prisoners confined in the Douse of Correction in that disitict at present, were for offences under those laws.— The Petition was tuderctl to be printed. Mr. FOttTRSCU E presented a Petit on from South :Ilsdton, in Devonshire, praying for the establishment of a mail to Ilfracombe. IheSPEAKKIt informed the /louse that Colonel Anion was the custody of the Serjesnt-at-Arms, for sot attending in his lace, pursuant is the order of the House. (Matte motion of %Ir. Secretary PERI., the /lon► Member was ordered to be discharged, on payment of his fees. DIEM CUSS SILL. Me. C. GRAN T brought in the Bill regulating the Corn Trade founded on the herniations; he should have, in a few days, to bring i■ a S. coed Bill on this subject, regulating the machinery sesp:cting averages. This Bill provided beyond the resolutions, th.s the monthly ges should be inserted in the Comas. The Dill would go into effect a+ soon as liaised; however the ges un May IS were to be struck as if suc► Bill bad not passed. Sir T. LETHBRII)GK said he should reserve himself tiff Monday sem, the proposed second reading, be should then mum an amyndineat, the nature of which did nut transpire. Bill read a first dine, and ordered to be read a second time ea Monday. •AML Amnon& Sk H. PARNRLI, snowed for a series of Accounts respecting Lank affairs, to which, ►e understood, there could be no objection —returns of the debt dile to tits Bank, the balances in the hands of the Bank. &c. Mr. Ii U M E lamented the character of the Government's inter course with the Bank. It enabled them to go there, whenever they pleased, fur money, regardless of the expense of procuring it. They ought to ►now what were the intentions of Government; at all events he hoped the Chancellor of the Both/ river, if he did not communi cate his intentions, at least would not eater into any negociation with the Bank for the renewal of their Charter, &c without letting rat liatnent have some Idea of what was going forward. Ile owned 130 was disappointed that such question was not mooted by this . motion. After a few words from Sir H. Pa ism., the motion was agreed to. ORANGE P 1 AT LISBURN& Mr. 13HOWNLOW described the subject which be -was about to bring under the notice of the House as of the greatest importance. He could not anticip4ie any pretence fir refusing the papers for which he intended to move, and these papers mould furnish what he was anent anxious to present to the House—a sample of the bad article called Cu' sveinmei.t in Ireland. The Act' . which had been passed with a view to put down Asso; ,stations in I. eland. bad been understood to be directed indiscriminately against all Associations; something of the manner in which it had been administered he was about to sbew. He supposed that he should not be called -upon to shew that this Act had not suppressed the C - .tholic ♦ssociation, for every man knew that it n.w ex isted, and that it exercised, uncontrouled and unre westrained, all the powers of government and legislation. - However unfavourable the opinion entertained in that House of some part of the conduct of this body, he anew that these was not a •word uttered by its Members but what found a ready echo in every jun of Leland. The Catholic Clergy, and the great majority of the people under their guidance, rendered it a prompt and willing obedience, of which no country and no Government could present an equal. ex. ' ample. The Catholic people of Leland repelled from that House were now about to surround the Throne with their complaints, and everything concurred to attest that Ireland was in a state which deserved the serious attention of Government and of that House. To put down the Catholic Association by law or by coercion, was oat of their power, but be would put it down by coaceesioo, be would pat it down by throwing the tivite-Gentleman tesiding in Ireland, tie could, by example and precept, t These sentiments, he declared to Gnu, the utmost sincerity of heart. Let r•me to the question, and see wheTher thing which called upon the Lord r land to act otherwise thin lie had now, be it re.ollected, called upon ject nearly two years after the (acts bad before him th • statement given the Lord Lieutenant, and if the House WAS quite ready to read it. It contained, reference to names, and he should b. do any thing which must naturally reviving acrimonious feelings—(Hear, be sufficient, therefore, merely to state plaint had been made of the conduct on the I I tb and 12th of July, 1825, upon to account for it. Though practice here to remove Magistrates. .that was not the case in Ireland, and cellos occasionally exercised that p viction. Mr. J hn.tos being called conduct, gave in a statement of That, to be sure, as the Hon. Baronet observed, was his own statement ; dense to be co:lected of the motives been influenced ? He must b: the ' passed through his own mind. Mr, that on the 12th he wore an orange confessed, however, that in so doing Tiled, and that it would have been-better appeared io that insignia. He said, how.- woes it for 40 years, he thought be - influence, and could exert hi-nself preventing the procession, if he appeare which he had so often worn upon hear). —He (Mr. Peel) lieve that such was the case, and honest intention; but he could not wisely, as a Magistrate. The Lot:: he received this statement, was actuall . pression that Mr. Johnston had encouraged Sion. That impression, however, having Lord Mainers came to England ' further notice of Mr. Johnston's col, was unusual to do so. Mr. Johnston, again, expressing a desire to be . vindication was thought satisfactory, swer to this communication the Lord occasion to explain to him what r' pleasure at finding that the charge raged the process on was not home person, in the situation of the Lord ever might be his sentiments on the have acted otherwise?—(Hear, hear, the whole case, and if, for the last stronger had occurred, be would whether it formed a sufficient ground of papers? Thee processions were degrees, and decaying under the example. Much might be done' effectual and most desirable way , the e►il was by example. He stated v ew. Hi. conduct was, he trusted, for his sincerity. They must bear these circumstances occurred in Is jiest passed. Had they taken place they occur next July, the thing Phis Geatleman was 78 years old. his life be mos► have occasion.lly -. Magistrate ol Ireland assistjng in College processions, when such exhib.tions with so much offence as at present. was to be made for an individual long in the habit of witnessing With respect to the H 41. Gentleman who brought the subject before heard any charge insinuated against in the course he had pursued with lic Question. He could derive no possible vane .ge from it. All he entreated Gentleman would carry with him those who maintained their former %. heal) It appeared that th s Gentleman hi= principles; but might he sot ha% motives? He entreated his Hon. still allow him to call him so) to have been his own situation and opinions had taken place previously to March, ssbmitted a motion to the House inquiry into the objects, signs, oaths, of the Orange Societies, and stated forming them were most anxious to relieve themselves from the interested motives ? Upon that occasion said that he cordially joined in wishing Societies would give way to the of the sense of Parliament ; and restricting their proceedings were Friend undertook to say that Orange longer exist, for that they would sn the land. Now was it not possible in the same spirit, thinking pessuasion be effective than force, had gone wearies their insignia, for the purpote advice more effective? lie believed ?' his motive, and that he and the influenced by the same sincere desire of Orange Processions and Orange - _ hoped he had discussed the question and without introducing topics could pot with justice to the indir sent to the motion. Dr.LLISHINGTON said, the look to the statements of the individual the facts and circumstances of the - seas a criminal in the world who, ' answer for his conduct, did not attempt ,santives were the most pure. He - House was bound to inquire into The Hone tint divided, when there appeared-- For tie Medan - Against it Majority egalost the Motion ovum PLIIITTILMAIII Mr. H. GR ATTA N made several taestment of persons confined in liar', where be said prisoners dim to become Protestants man produced an iron instrument, 'forced on the head, and part of the victim. (The production of sent produced an effect on the House that it must have caused to the wer general laughter.) It had been woe to the hand that would stop Ireland. He could say, woe to the instruments on the heads of any of whether for the purpose of torture or of -punishl osld, o e e ~eJ I,o r :p e w e t : 61 :1 4 H ie rIn co du l ti d e etithihhs th e m , t h e e e r ight Ra sr llor of lw l e l 11 ! r ! i lad acted? They ate •C >on to consum e thi s " IN 'acts had occurr e d. 111 r y t i be y a ba r h ym ia n :; ear e tr: t n . jh ir on: : ::: : :: : 1 4 , 4 :ii to e , d c , i2b t po e an t n h c e tto t H a cte: cpaia c om: induct of ht. i s h tt t , uJ age 1825, and he *Ai crlle4l ugh it was ',ev er tils 'ales without eon, ct i n , and the Lord Ch o : ,111 oat power Siding' o n • rll his of the circumnaeces. aronet (Sir J Ne wpc. , t ; but how eke wat t? . carves by which be h 4 l the beet julge of nh, r Mr. Joitn.t on ly long he had been 111.,d. , . been-hetet had he me lid, howewerome t h„i tt n be should have mo t 'self more effectually i s apptAfeJiUthat upon similar I.CcAbicm, ?eel) could easily be. , and that this was h, d not say that be acted Lind C.taucellnr , be'ore c actually under the im. • I I encouraged the votes. er, having been teraird, land without taking any ?s communication, at u uhnston, however, me te be informed whether ictory ? and it was is le Lord Chancellor toot • sat the law was, sad his barge of having env* home out. Could any Lord Chancellor, what. n the Catholic Question, hear, hear.) Such vs 4 e last two years, nothing aid put it to the Hone ;round for the producti were wearing away b the influence of good , ne by law, but the mos ray for putting an end!, mated this with no siniste sited, sufficient guarame bear in mind, that whet n 1825, the Act had onir • lace la,t July, or, shoun ig would be different- phi, For many yeas ~Hy -een, even the id in College Green at thee otos were mat looted apts . resent. Some aliowa. rid ual who had been at log sights of this kind. otletnan (Mr. Brownie* ire the Howe, be veva gainst him of innocent with respect to the Cat e no possible persona) ad. rated was. that the Hon. I him a little feeling Ice former opinioos.—(Herr, entleman bad adhered to have done so from hoots: Hon. Fiend (if he would i) to reflect what would I opinions if these charge, March, 1825 s when he ionise for instituting as s, oaths, and pan-words stated that the person. ous for inquiry, in order oe malignant charge of at occasion he f,Mr. Peel) 'wishing that anOtangt the repeated expression , and when the laws fe were passed, his Hoc. Driftage Lodges woeldss old submit to the law a saible that Mr. Janata MAISIIIISiOII more likely u :one among these peoph Purpose of rendering Ifs hewed that to hoe bet oe Lord Chancellor wart desire of abating thetsa ✓ange' Associations. lie question with scope. lies of irritation, bat be dividuals concerned, coo the House ought pa is sdividual himself, but t' F the case. Thee use rho, when called upon t attempt to phew that hi' He contedded that the nto the subject. ere appeared-- . lie odes - AMMAN. :veral observations on ei in the Dublin Penitee. 4 were tortured to compel The Honourable Gentle tient, which be said wet' of it into the mouth ol of this torturing jolt"' House very diSereat her wearers—there was Tel as said in another plat! , stop the reformation the hand that put sacs of his Majesty's subjects hire or of punishment