Star. — London, England, 1820-07-13 00:00:00

- -. pointed . Kingdom. Mr. Waxecn.a, from•the Treasury, brought up an Account of the. National Debt of Great Britain and Ireland, including the Austrian and Portuguese Loans, and a Ikturn of the total amount of the Funded and Unfunded Dibt from the Ist of February, 1786, to the Ist of February, 1920, which, on the motion of the Earl of Latnsanaxs, were ordered to be printed for the use of the House: Mr. &worm and others brought up from the House of 0:m -m0ns the Marine. Deceased Relatives' Bill, and the East India Volunteers' Bill, which, along with some Bills of a private and' Ipcal nature, brought up by Sir J. Gaanussa and others, were read a first time. - The Assessed Taxes Composition Bill, the Public Works (Ire land) Bill, the Sugar Importation (Ireland) Bill, and the Welch Fines Bill, were also brought up from the Communal,/ Mr. BaocnEN and others, and read a first time. Pellew's Divorce Bill, the Slaves Removal Bill, and the Smuggnng Prevention Bill, went through Committees, and eke Reports were brought up and received. • MASTERb IN CHANCERY. Lord KENYON presented two Petitions from certain Mer chants and Electors of the City of Dublin, complaining of a clause in a Bill then on their Lordships' table, to prevent 31r. Ellis, a Master in Chancery, from sitting in Parliament as Re presontativeof that City. His Lordship stated, that the clause was one which could not be justified on the ordinary principles of just legislation, as it was directed against an individual by an ee post facto operation ; and besides, as English Masters in Chan cery were allowed to sit in Parliament, he could see no reason why the same principle should not be acted upon with regard to Ireland. His Lordship moved that the Petitions be read and laid on the table. Lord HOLLAND said, that he did not mean to oppose the reception of the Petition, but he wished to sit the Noble Lord, whether be meant to oppose the Bill, or the particular clause, toad in what stage? His Lordship added, that it was his opinion . that Masters in Chancery were disqualified by their office from the right of sitting in Parliament, because it was an acknow ledged principle that no servant of the House of Lords should sit in the other House, and Masters in Chancery were servants ' of the House of Lords, and amenable to itoorders. Lord KENYON stated in answer to the question of the No bk. Lord, that it was not his own intention to propose any al turation in the Bill, but It might be possible that • some other Noble Lord had such an intention, in which case he would feel it his duty to vote that the clause be expunged. The Earl of LIMERICK observed, that there was this dif ference between English and Irish Masters in Chancery—that, from a Report on the Irish Court of Chancery, it appeared that the individual, to whose situation the Petitions referred, had stated that his duties as a blaster of Chancery required his pre sencein Dublin during ten months of the year. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, he was not aware that the second reading of the Bill had been yet moved, nor if it had been, was he certain that it would be read a second time. Lord, KENYON re-stated what be had before said, that be did not himsr.lf intend to propose any alteration in the Bill. If an amendment was moved to leave out the clause, he would give it his support.-11e Petitions were then ordered to lie on the table. . The remaining Bills on the table were then forwarded in their mimes, and the House adjourned. HOUSE OF COMKONS. This day the Gallery was opened at four o'clock. Mr. Jou suss, from the Office of the Chief Secretary for Ire land, appeared at the Bar with certain papers, containing an ac count of the exports and imports of Ireland.—Laid en the table, The Co.srastax of the Committee appointed to inquire into the merits of a Petition complaining of an undue return for the Aberdeen District of Burghs, reported that.Josepta Hume, Es' q. the Sitting Member, was duly elected; and that the. Petition against his return was not frivolous or vexatious. Sir JOSEPH YORKE-presented a Petition from an indivi dual named Henry Constantine Jennings, praying that a cer-. min invention of his.for printing the documenta of the House, by which savings to the amount of £lOO,OOO would be effected in three years, might be Adopted by the House. The Hon. Member said, he was not aware of the precise mode by Which this very large - aMount of savings was to be effected, but he knew the individual in question to be possessed of some inge nuity. He had invented a sort of machine or bed to preserve the lives of.seamen in danger of being drowned. This bed was stuffed with cork shavings instead of flock, the usual material, and the consequence was, that every sailor whirr in his bed was enabled to ride as comfortable upon those as if he had been on a fi.h's back —(d lane:). It also Appeared that this very ingc r.ious per%on hid employed himself upon the most puzzling of all NA:ricers, the discovery of the longitude.. In fact, Mr. Jen- ninjs Intl contrived, by an iron bowl, to neutralize the magnet !2 (.1 &wet). He had nu doubt whatever that the House might soon expect to benr cf this man having devised a plan to find out tie. philosopher's stone I or made even a still more marvellous dia•overy, so ready was Ise at invention—(4 taitgh). Tile Petition was read, and ordered to lie on the table. Oa. the motion of Mr. Lessamorote, the Assessed Taxes-Com roti!ion Bill. and the Sugar / Trade in Ireland Bill, wore read a third time and passed. tLe motion of Sir W. Scorr, the Sea Offences Bill went tLroo;11 a.Committee, and the Report was ordered to be re to-inorrow. , Ms. BENNETT brought in a Dill to regulate Public En dowments connected with the Education of the Poor, -which 'IN s read the first timc, and ordered to be read the se and time to-snorrow. , The Education DiU was read the second time, and ordered to 4 be committed tb-morrovi. 'Mr. C. HUTCHINSON adverted to a Statement spade yes terday by bis Honourable Friend, the Member for (Mr. Beruiett), relative to what that . Honourable Member con sidered a misrepresentation of a speech of his (Mr. Hutchin son's), as 'reported in a respectable Morning Paper. He now took occasion to state tio the House, that there was not a sisigle sentiiitaut in that speech which he was not ready to acknowledge, except one, which imputed to his Honourable Friend a retrac tation of what he had said relative to the merits of a successful medical piactitioner (Sir William Adams). The Hon. Member was proceeding to pay a tribute to the abilities of Sir William A dams, when be was called to order by The SPEAKER, who asked the Hon. Member if he had ,ny motion to submit to the House? as if not, he was out of or der in the 'course he W3S poriuing. Mr. II UTC hi I NSON begged leave to express his deference to the correction of 'the Chair, and after stating that he had• no motion to.propose, concluded with a few more observations in justification of the speech alluded to. Mr. BENNETT denied having made any retiactation of what be had stated respecting Sir W. Adams. aREACH OP PRI VILEGE. • Dr. PHILLIMORE moved the Order of the Day, that Richard Armstrong Jarvis be called up to the bar, in order to be reprimanded and discharged. The motion being agreed to, that individual appeared at the liar accordingly, and The SPRAKkit proceeded to address him. The Right Hon. Gentleman, after stating that he had _been reported to the House as having disobeyed the warrant issued for his attend. 'mice on the subject of a Petition against the return for the Borough . of Grantham, said that he had absconded, in order to l zooid being taken into custody. Having, however, since sur reodered himseit, he had been committed to his hieestrf )ali of Newgate, as a punishment for his offence in g the ostler of the House. Since his commitment he had sent to ekte Heise' a Petition, expressing his contrition far the offence, and throwing himself for indulgence upon the mercy of the Ease. Front these cotssidesitioas, themilltii the House was disposed to extend its h daATIMI there sets Woo passage 14 his Petition . j ths opold not help comment ing upon. It Mated that be (Jarvis) was not aware NOW* ce of the Speaker's warrant& He • ' now Idviab4hat •neitlxig.ke, nor t h e gibers. 4d any tight to know. *OW of d w.littowor &b -owes of thone 4 wanante that hal bops isnot.. Milk IMP Cot to set "thee saves up as India orate insp!ftepitillf sintstss their dpity eau plain and direct, it wasliotillagAlefithgn ittb. pet* Oldham. Believing, however, that he 1111114 More from . , . • - ~ . • .••• . 1. • . . qtiolittitiMENTAßT PROCBEDIAT9S. . : . • ;:;::' r L ____ -..--... 1 ' .!t;., •,.=E OF LORDS, JULY 12. z , „„°.4.•, . + • heard on the Scots Cause of the Duke of , f• • • . .. Ple Scott Waring, ci-skeent the celebrated WI. ' ei.-- J i=dtpostponed. Mr. Jousesou the office of the Chief Secretary for Ire- - -bad, presented the Eighth Report• of the i:oniUdssioners ap- • ... aninted to inspect the Putffic Accounts of that part of the United ___.__ _ _ - , a; - • . • igeolle.aim from sureiiiiiilit soodw, 01111 Pleurt to intigekbe ed, reiress of )nsticei NM iakillir ill the al stance one into emsidennteer the neem ordered . to, be Ailed he was now awardiney distharged* the poilebest oil* fem. Jervis thrill inithigilwillou the bar; MR Sr. LUSHIN9TOW L ,the reprimand in . bus oedered to by entered do tile Journals; the Hogtionese-st the same time given three diejact chews. , BEN NETT presented a Petition4neila en individual wbose name cuuld not be learnt, prayieg hireekoleibeeilime, in a trial with the Middlesex Magistrates. dsitievklenee of the Cleat and short-hand writer of the Polk. Committee..—The prayer of the Petition was agreed to. i GRANTHAM ILLECTION. Dr. PHILLIMORE`moved that the Resolution of the Committee appointed to inquire into the uteri*" of the Petition complaining of an undue election for the Borough of Granthatn, be rend; which being done, the Hon. and Learned Membet observed, that his object in rising was to prevent other persons from falling into the delusion which the Gentleman (Mr. ;Hughes) had done whose election was declared void by the statute of William HI. prohibiting the treat. ing of voters or giving them money under the pre text of indemnity for loss of time. In his opinion, it was equivocal whether the treating of voters, or ;giving them money under the circumstances men tioned, was bribery or not, acceraing to. the Statute in question. He certainly was not quite satisfied on the point in question, and therefore, with the view of giving a positive interpretation to the Statute, he should now move the following Resolution : " Resolved—That the practice of treating. or giving money to voters by way of indemnity for loss of time, is highly illegal, subversive of the freedom of election, and tends to most dan gerous corruption." Mr. ABERCROMBY thought the Resolution al together objectionable. It 'was declaratory on a point which, even according to the acknowledgment of the Honourable and Learned Mover himself, was very doubtful. Mr. WYNN said there could be no doubt that giving money, or treating voters, in such cases, amounted to bribery, according ,to the Act. ' Mr. WROTTESLEY was of opinion that a doubt did exist, and the present Resolution not being suffi ciently explanatory upon the question, he opposed it. .Mr. W. smurti clamed with the Honourable Member who had spoken last. It. was because, a doubt did exist, at admitted by the Hon. Member, that he (Mr. Smith)thought the Resolution necessary: Mr. LOCKHART said, that even if the Resolu.. tion should pass, it was probable that the Judges might not agree to it; as a mere Resolution of that 'House could not be held binding as law. Mr. WARREN was firmly persuaded that no Re solution of this House oat ht to controul an Act of 'Parliament. Besides, the words of the Resolution were vague and indistinct. A measure of this na lure required serious deliberation, and he should therefore suggest to the Hon. and Learned Members 1 the propriety of withdrawing the Resolution. Mr. WYNN contended, that every payment to voters; no matter how it was described, was illegal. i Dr. PIIILLIMORE said, he never had any doubt whatever, not even - the shadow of a ,doubt, that giving money .to, voters was to all intents and pur poses illegal; according to the 'Statute of William the Third. But he only acted in this case upon the Report of the Committee, from which it appeared .at an inveterate practice had prevailed in the Bo rough of Grantham, of. giving £7 or £8 to each of the voters, by way of recompense for loss of time.— It was by following this inveterate practice that the ;th Gentleman, whose Election had recently been de clared void, had been misled ; and he wished by this Resolution, to prevent others from falling into the same error. , The House then divided, and the numbers were— For the Resolution, 66—Against it, 60—Majority, 6. Mg. ABEIIeItOIBY said, with reference to a Resolution (that of Dr. Phillimere) which had just been carried by a very small majority, that he would take an early opportunity, in the, next Session, to bring the question before Parliament. THE QUEEN'S DEFENCE. Mr. BROUGHAM said, he rose,..purivant to no tice, to move that he and his Learned Friend (Mr. De.inian) should have leave given them, .as her Ma jesty's Attorney and Solicitor-General, tieing; Mem bers of that House, to appear in her Lehait at the Bar of-the House of Lords. The Learned Gentle man moved, without further preface—" That leave be given to her Majesty's Attorney ;..id Solicitor. General,. MeMbers of this House, to plead as Counsel at the Bar of the House of Lords against the Bill now pending in that House concerning her Majesty, ender the peculiar circumstances of 'the case ; and that the said leave shall S not, in time coming, be' drawn into a precedent to permit the Members of this House tq Act as Counsel at the Bar of the House, of Lords."—The Learned Gentleman observed, that he had introduced the latter part of the motion, be cause the House would recollect, that their order, was more especially directed against Private Bills than Appeals, and he thought it was proper that the salvo should be co-extensive with their Stand-- ing Order—(Hear, hear). ' ~:. • Lord CAS TLEREAGH said, the case of the. Queen was so peculiar, it w4s of suChtranseentleut importance, that if there were,two Honourable Mem bers in that House to whose legal care her "Majesty' wished to intrust her interests in the Houre of Lords,, it was quite sufficient testate that fact to induce the House to dispense with the Standing Order, and to grant the necessary leave. But he conceived the same privilege should be conceded to the other side, if Gentlemen, Meinbers of that House,...svere called on to exercise their, talents in support . ' of this im portant Bill. In that cise, it Would be proper that the indiiiduals thus selected should exercise their functions in that House with the same reserve, and with the same uaderstanding, that die Gentlemen opposite would exercise theirs—namely, that they should discuss the question professionally, and not interfere by giving any vote as it. In making these observations,. he alluded to his Majestj's Attorney and Solicitor-General, who might, in the perform. ance of their professional duties, be called on to at tend. Assuredly, the reasons that applied, in grant ing leave to Members of thit House to oppose the Rill, would apply with equal, force to the case of those Members who might be required, profeseionally, to suppcirt it. Actuated by this feeling, be would, either by way of Amendment, or in the shape of a I substantive.ntotion,,eisll, on Ue AWN to 'allow his I Ildaje4y4 Attorney and Scilicitae.General .the' same t leave that was poised to the Attearef and Selicitore • i Gbl General of her Mx testy. , • ~~ O.' • %. ';‘. ! 1,z7 , • • - , , • F 147. C _ Mr. W. Vila rod it jippeired ti hers-of Shis•House Muse of Lit& as this Home. there lea,* vas I beth--hut necessary grounds, and accompanied or not voting.. If: that were not the case, it would produce extrerne - inconienieniei for it would Ise ini-: possible that Gentlemewcisuld come With Impartiality. to the discussion of a Bill here, against or in favour of which, dry acted as Counsel at the Bar of the. other House. This reason indeed was stated, as the ground of the Resolution of 1666, which mighrbe considered as declaratory of the law of the case. In, private Bills the ineonvenienceWould hi particularly felt ; for if,Counsel who were Members of this HOuse were allowed to appear as Advocates in those-Bills at the Bar Hof. the Lords, it might happen that they would be retained in tuch caset•lnerely to procure their assistance in this House. After the Resolution in 1666, such indulgence was frequently granted : but it was also the ground of much dispute between the two Houses; for as it was essential to the autho rity of every Court that it should have the.power of punishing its practitioners, the Lords claimed the right of confining some Members who acted at their Bar in that capacity. This was another inconveni eoce, and it tended. to restrict the indulgence to cases of appeals. The last leave of this kind was given, he believed, in 1710. Under these Circumstances, he thought it would be better to add- to the motion the words, " that the same should not be. drawn into precedent;' and to add,. also, that the application was Made " under the special circumstances of. the case." With these guards, he thought the House might safely 'grant the permission to her Majesty's Attorney and Solicitor-General ;. but he thought that the King's Attorney and Solicitor-General did not stand in the same light. The Icing was got a party in this Case,. and he did not see why his Officers should get a permission of this - nature. As to her Majesty) Officers, he did not see any objection to the motion, if it should not be brought into a precedent. Mr. BROUGHAM said, he had no kind of objec tion to the introduction of the words proposed by his Honourable Friend, and he accordingly inserted them J in his motion. • After a few words from Mr. BAKKE% the clues. tion was then put, " That leave be given to her Ma jesty's Attorney and Solicitor-General, Members of this House, to . plead at . the Bar of the House of Lords, under the particUlar circumstances of the case, against a Bill pending in-that House concerning her' Majesty the Queen, and that the same leave shall not, in time to come, be drawn into a precedent."—The 'notion was-agreed to. • . Lord CASTLEREAGH did not think that any' distinction could be drawn between the case of the King's Attorney and Solicitor-General, and that of the Attorney and Solicitor-General of her Majesty. The King's Attorney and Sidicitor-Genetal were Of ficers appointed to act in great'pulilic prosecutions, and had a right, as Officers of the Crown, to exercise their legal Junctions in this, as in other cases of a more common nature. It would. seem that.they were the only patties that could appear, with , advantage, before the-House of Lords. Heconceived it would be very unfair, supposing that the Bill should pass the House of Lords, and be brought under the consi deration of this House, if, when one party was al lowed the advantage that would result from the at tendahce of two Gentlemen who had been present at the wholeproceeding, and cross-eiamined the wit nelses, the opposite party. were not allowed the assist- aace of two other Gentlemen who had an equal "knowledge of the case, and who were possetted of the necessary facilities for bringing the whole of its Merits before the Hansa In his opinion,. the public 'Situation of theXines Attorney and Solicitor-General s!ndered it equally necessary that they should sager-' intend the prosecution, ai that the confidestial ohm -don of her Majesty's-Attorney and Solicitor-General should induce the House to grant them that liberty., He should, therefore, move—. " That leave be given to bisMajesty'i Attorney and Sdlicitor ' General, Members of this House, to plead u Counsel a the Bar of the House of Lords, in support of the Bill noir pending in that House, concerning her Majesty, under the particular cir cumstances of the case ; and that the said leave shall not, in time cabling, be drawn into precedent." Mr.- W. WYNN said, the case of the Queen's At torney and Solicitor-General could not, as it appeared to him, be drawn into precedent; but, on the con trary, he conceived that of the King's Attorney and Solicitor• General might. He knew of- no ordinary, occasion on which the Attorney and Solicitor-General of the Queen could be Caned on to act in that capa city ; but the House knew there were many Bills in' which the State was concerned, where a similar per mission might be required for the King's Attorney and Solicitor-General. The House must be aware, that when Bills connected With 'the State were op posed and supported - it the Bar of this House, the King's Attorney 4ndSolicitor-General were not called on to plead ; and on the same principle s ome oth er Learned Gentlemen might be selected to appear at the Bar of the House of Lords. Mj. W. WILLIAMS inquired whether the King's Attorney and Solicitor-General would be precluded from voting ? Lord CASTLEREAGH said, he bad already dis-H tinctly stated that they would. Mr. BROUGHAM observed, he was by no means unwilling that the Learned Gentlemen who were op- i posed to him and his Learned Friend on this occasion' should be permitted to plead at the Bar of the House of Lords. He would not therefete offer any opposi. don to the motion; but, at the same time, it was ne cessary for him to state that there was a peculiarity in the Queen's case, that did not at all apply to the; of the King, whi ch chewed the _great propriety permitting the attendance of her Legal Advisers at the Bar of the other House. The Ki ng and the i hrbe lic, it should be recollected, were Opresesitedinlils House of Lords b r the Judges, which was. PISA' stronger reason than. any. th at had been .rven s for supposing that the appearance of his fillessty's A. 'Raney and Solicitor-General was not absolutely nee 011WIFT. Besides, thegrra Officers of Stale appeared his Majesty's whilst, on the other hand,th tineen had no paprika:ad ve whatsoever inthat Horn 'lt•Lard CASTLEREAGH' said, the Ministers of dif Ciewsi could only be coasideredisiXtcliviffiSal capacity, aslffernbell or ale EfOi t se air.M.'"baoll was 'then arappo. . . stti he had ifeeetved her Mir. that his,professional services those of the Learntd Gentlemea conduct her defence ; and he would be of opinion, under the of the case, that the same in- conceded te him as bad been Legal. Friends who were her Majesty's - official law ndvise s rs. He should consider himself cis 4' t >i>t f vilifigitiiii - ailtiiteirned:Frierids, mkt) vote on silly itage of the Bill, if it should uki matelyvoure•.before.thitt Mote- He should there foto . • • . . " Thai leave etch to • Dr:lsol6BMs Member of House, to plead as coalsel tithe fir or be }lessee of against the Bill now pending in . that House, concerning her /.la lesty, under the particular etretinweanceetof nisielue, and thu the said leave shall not in time comint be dassia - flitoprtcvdezit." Lord CASTLEREAGH said;.liehad no objectiot.. 'to this permission being granted to any Fralesional .Gentleman on either •sid& of the House, whose ser: vices might be called for on this occasion. At tlii satne time, he did not see any particular occasion fur the services of the Learned Gentleman. Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH said, it was perfectly . well known to every Gentleman conversant whit Parliamentary proceedings, that a Civilian was ways one of the parties to snail transaction as tin: which now occupied the attention of Parliament. 'There was st peculiar propriety in retaininge Civi lian upon this occasion; and it was obvious, from the cases quoted by the Learned Gentleman (Mr. Wynn) that the same principle would not apply to co ssoail a bar as was occupied by the civil law withthe same strength that it woulet to the more eltensive bar which was occupied by the common law. The choice, was necessarily much more limited in the former than the latter case, and therefore the permission should be the more readily conceded. He thought it was a request that ought to be complied with, not from any feeling of indulgence, but as a matter of • 'ct justice. • Mr. W. WYNN could see no which separated the case of frotin that of any other CO - tinsel •leave to be heard with respect might be brought before the Hi Attorney and. Solicitor-Genera. Queen were the standing and official personages, and, from their situation, nduct the business more satis: Learned Gentlemen. But this did to his Learned Friend, who stood same ground with any other. might be required to act as Colinsel mg ht the other House. Lie kr- Doctors!Commons was not V) minster Hall; but it .could..suppli of great skill andtalent,_-itho.we• that House. - , Mr. BANKES. said; if the Hi allow any of its Members tO:bo _ Rouse of L ords , they undisislitedlysnight but he conceived that it would _ - able measure. The Legal Servants had received permission to plead other House, and beyonclitbat I could not safely go.. letbq 44 Able for their. at any .future tik, sioDal Gentlemen, Members of Iserty of pleading,.in-diVorce cases, of :Lords. Ile . could- see - sko, tween the Loine4 C l esulemitns*" other Professional Member of the therefore pet his -negative on entertaining any W feeling againtt • an.—The Motion was BANIWS Saying " Not" ADMINISTRATION OW' ENDIDS6II - Mr. BROUGHAM obtained ice. _ Bill for improving . the Administrathin inents connected with Education. lIRRACM OW PRIVILE4W. Sir J. NEWPORT said ; be ' Lion of the House to alsubjeet leges were concerned. ,The Himse would that in the Bill for the ini g id ted ancer an t d h y a a t in wa; th i e ie s l i nid i t n u i sii i on a s . at Bill With this clause had aving been sanctioned by a very dry. Under these circumstances that, if any person had to speak It least speak of it with decency. ieved, would be astonished page in which that - clause was characterized of Resolutions which were passed - Merchants in Dublin, on Thursday, Before he read the Resolutions - thought it: would be but right singular speech with which they Colonel Blacker said, He regretted question of such great importance; bumble an individual as himself but," said he, 4. worm, if trampled %torn, and rouse like the slumbering beighter in • every part of the - Blacker then proceeded to say, pending in Parliament, a clause of give them of their chosen Representative, If not speedily prevented, a wroni regcaulatietlaodse.ums:l;of ,s. magnitude; he had, therefore been tether a series of Resolutions , sons might suppose the language but be would say s in repfy to their rights were infringed upon He would say, that else Minister, must be told .in theinclering langnage--(1 laisghter)-.the wrongs he has dared to • as soft language could have no (Lord Castlereigh). having degraded conduce--{Shook oflaughter).—Belf would here observe, that the Noble I events, .oneiciasolntion, his cOnthict House. The same Mr. Blacker proposes series of - Resolutions lotions, which characterised the " unjust," ." unconstitutionaV• upon the rights of the citisens of one, which ran as follows cumaances isnd wlich.thiv clause into the.li= n Cainsibnsil rauteitin g if as an attempt gislation to the i puvans of patty." - then ropostal l *ntOed on the DV If W4l WI in this speech I • i; LYNN said ' that ft* 4/switifliesi LUSHIN OTOft Taired to to. the pratfice, ihat gems! 'jesty's royal commands itslionse should Oppege 'at,th ,olTet. the ? should be added to thus Lords as Advocates, withoptlife leave of alteady selected to coi e. there weppjoretakitasol'as eils44oo hoped that the House Is nt teihe-reign OFElfsit 4 ,.peculissr circumstances *ere always-lbosidecrost special lAd , dulgeoce should be cc strounds, and accompanied with the reser v e granted to his Legal. Fr • . .._, • 3 :pc' cial citcunastances the. Learned Member I who might apply for to any other Bill that 10115 e of Lords. The ral of the Kmg and naiad Counsel of tlio:o tuatinn, could perhaps tisfactorilyc than other aid nee at all apply stood precisely on. th'e _professional man who r m i n sel on a Bill pend- knew that - the' bar of large as that of West- pply rii - iny,t;eniiemen . were ii& *lobe's of.. Houle thought dt to • lats beard at the Bat of stiitedly might do so;.. be a highly-objeetion- - rants of their Majesties' ead at the Dar- of-- the- . t bessibtlity thiitouitt it-wouldbeimptri‘ - : . 1 ttrarse-Rldese , -.•:. Ofth at the B4r the :uses, cif thb Ser f . Ao, 1116 ., '7' aoy- die HOUSetii!ife - Oh°Uld . I 'the- Moo*. *chant ainst the,cielk- tEep ag. ff :45 Mt. - 'd leave to bliss in a inist'ratitity. of. fiadovr- .on. vtuarw.; : had to .eall . the amen- in which their privi- lease would recollect, tiontitheHigh Court ise was inserted, which Master in Chancery ;n use me incompatible. tad classed this House, ery considerable major es it might be supposed k of this Bill, be might But the House, he 1 to hear of the las- s characterized in a set assed by the Guild of rsday, the 6th instant. ons to the. House, be to read.a -part of tho ley vrerarrefaced. A • egretted that, 'upon a tnce; it devolved on so self to address them ; Templed upon, would 'than% lien !—(Loud le Horse.) , —This- Mr. r, that t , the Bill now se of which went to de- nprese tative,T eat ldb e e st , iron; of the seen induced to put to- ; no doubt some per- age to be too strong; to such persons, that on by the Minister,— ter, Lord Castlereagh, language-(Ceatinued dared to put on them, o effect upon him, he gradedllouelf by hi* —dielflir 4: Newport) Diable Lorithsid, .at al indict avas-that of the :er then IstoCeeded to s ; and after pro Res °. 1)e clauskas ;7. and -as entrenching A . Dublin, he proposed That, from all the cm- clause was introduced Wst feel ourselves war- gtetept to degrade le- krty,"-• A Petition wai 'foregoing Resolutions alone that this class I