Star. — London, England, 1827-10-27 00:00:00

conspctent skill had bad the conducting of the vessel, it would net have happened. John Douglas, Master Attendant of the dock.—Pro per measures were not taken to dock the vessel, and the ropes broke. Merchantmen find their own pilots. Them ought to have been a pilot on board. Mr. Murray, barbour.master.—The vessel was regeV . lolly moored, head and stern, to his Majesty's That was good mooring. Witness had seen vessels dis charge at every tier of the King's mooring. Cross-examined—Vessels more frequently unloaded in the basin. The vessel would not have been allowed to moor where she did, if she had tot bad timber for the dock-yard.) Mr. Hawkes, a ship-surveyor, surveyed the brig en the 29th of March ; 1,000/. would have repaired her. Lord TINVIRDIIOI..-What do you say, Mr. Campbell, MI to the mooring ? Mr. CAMPBBLL—The words of the policy are, " If she has been moored and anchored there." Mr. Murray recalled—Numbers of vessels were' Moored to chains laid down. This brig was made fast] to the King's ship, and was also fastened to the moot- ing chain, which, was fastened to the mooring anchor. ' m Tatum, the ate, recalled—The vessel had a rope oni from the bow to the mooring chain. She was not moored to stop—not moored in such a-nsanner as she would have been if she bad had to deliver her cargo there. Lord TENTERDEN..-I own I am of opinion that the vessel must be taken as Moored and anchored ; if not, she remains ten days in peril, and either way there was an end of the cause. Mr. CAMPBELL said something in reply; and we un derstood his Lordship to say he would not step him, but would reserve the point. Mr. Caernas.t., in reply, said he could not help feel ing alarmed at the intimation of his Lordship; but if he could thew it was ill-fonnded, his Lordship would, with his usual candour, review his opinion. As to the defence made, of the vessel having arrived in port when the accident happened, it was necessary, in deciding upon contracts, to see the sense in which words were used, for that might be true in one which would be in. correct in another sense ; and the question was, whether the vessel had been mooted twenty-four hoots in safety after her return ? It was from Sierra Leone to London. The port of London commenced at Gravesend, but the place where the vessel was to be discharged was the terminus ad queue, and this was in the dock-yard at Deptford. The river was so full of ice, that, although the vessel could get opposite the dock-yard on the ISth of February, it was impossible to attempt getting into it until the 27th, during which interval she was neither moored, in the sense of the policy, nor could she be so moored until she reached the dock, her place of destina tion. Whilst in the elver, at Deptford, however near to it, she had not reached her destination, and there could not be any mooring within the meaning of the policy. With respect to the delay, it was impossible to contra vene the laws of nature; the dock was hermetically sealed, and they were obliged to lay opposite. The contract with Government provided that the timber should be delivered on the 31st of December, but time was me part of the essence of that contract, Government waived the objection they might have made, land the defendants could not take advantage of it. If the ves sel could have entered the dock on the 19th, 20th, or Ilse, and did 004 INOCause the proper orders and papers had not arrived, then the underwriters would indeed bare been discharged, but they were not discharged because the ice blocked up the dock. The order came on the 23d, and it was admitted that the 27th was the earliest day it was possible to attempt getting io. With respect to the defence of negligence, Mr. Braine was a nautical man who had devoted himself for the last nine years to docking vessels. The sailors employed , on board were eiperienced men, although they were not the.original crew, who were by the act of GOD disabled in the sickly climate of Sierra Leone, and there were 16 men on board, being a greater number than the original crew. There was an esprit de corps in the evidence for the defence, but it was clear the vessel grounded from the badness of the weather, which occasioned the ropes to break, and not from carelessness or want of skill. Lord TIN TERDEN said, there were two questions of fact—whether the vessel was detained at the mooring chain for an unreasonable time, and whether persons of competent skill were employed to carry her into dock? If, atter her arrival in the riser, the delay was occa sioned from an uncertainty where she was to deliver her cargo, the policy would be avoided ; but if the state of the river prevented her delivering her cargo os entering the dock until the 27th of February, then there was not such a delay as would excuse the underwriters. If there were no unnecessary delay, the Jury would then have to consider whether persons of competency were em p!oyed capable of taking her into dock ? Braine a as said to have been in the habit of taking ships into dock as a pilot. Was he a fit person for that purpose? If persons of competent skill were not on board, the de .tendanta were entitled to a verdict: if there were, the underwriters must answer for the loss. Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 1,7001. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GUILDHALL, Omr. 26. SttMgs before Michaelmas Term, before Mr. Jorice Gant= and Special Juries. WAGON AND OTHERS V. HAMMOND. Mr. Caownea opened the pleadings. This was an! action on a bill of exchange for 3001. drawn and ac-, crepted by the Cornwall and Devonshire Mining Corn= patsy, dated the 17th el March, 1826, and made payable two months after date. It was endorsed to the plaintiffs. Mr. Sergeant WILDE stated the case. The plaintiffs were bankers in Cornwall, and in the course of business had the bill in question paid to them on account of thel Cornwall and Devonshire Mining Company, of which the defendant would Le loosed to be a member. The,' bill was originally drawn by order of the Directors,' with others, to the amount of 8001. for debts incurred: In the working of mines. The Learned S.rgeant said,' he wonld prove that the bill was drawn by the orders of the Directors, and he should then wait to see what answer could be made to the case. Witnesses were then called, who proved the partner ship of the defendanr, by his signature to the deed o' settlement, and payment of the call made on him by the, Company ; it was also proved that a valuable considera-, non had been given for the bill, which wasthen put in' and read. It appeared to be drawn by the Mining cashier, and accepted by the seprey to the Cirpapy.: The ATTORNEY GENZILAT4II,1 m O,ll were geantblartawavitaa and Mr. ALM) addtesked the Jot y. for the defepdant. He made a statement of theartmet facts as those disclosed a few days since in thia Coutt, in the case of " Ellis v. Schmeick And anotherrin onto to shew that the Company was a bubble, and had o; sinated in fraud. Having dwelt fur some considerable time on this subject, he stated that be should test his defence on four distinct points vapor, which, he c eeived, would deprive the.plnintiffs of any right to rte cover. In the first place, he contended that unless it could he shewn that the defendant had a real interest in the Company, be could not be considered a partner of it, and consequently coald•not in any point of view be held real o amble for au, debts incurred. Secondly, he con tended that the denature Oa deed. such as that Zilch the ffafireitaat had deed, which was merely pinspec dee, was net solfigieat to maim a man a partner,. ' Thirdly, that the members of a Mining Association "were not joint tenants, but only tenants in common; pad that. mansequently, the act of any tine would not be binding on the whole. lf, therefore, a party en. dearoured to recover against an individual of a Com pany, upon any document signed in the - name of the whole, it would be incumbent on him to prove that the patty against whom be was proceeding had given his express consent and authority to the transac tie°. In the case of a bill of exchange, it would be neressary to provistbat the party had individually autho rised its being &ewe. in support of this argument, the Learned Counsel instanced the eases of the Honourable Societies of the Inner Temple and Sergeants' Inn, of 'the former of which he was a member, as examples of cases Where many persons were joined together for a specific purpose. The members of these societies. however, would be very much surprised to find that. they were liable for the act of any one of thews The members of a seining association were in a precisely similar situation, and could net lie held to be indiviit dually responsible. Fourthly, he contended that if that : members of the Company were not considered in the light be had just described, but were held as liable for the acts of each other, then he should insist that the plaintiffs could have no right to recover on the bill in question, as it appeared to be security for a stirs) 01 money given by a greater number of persons than six. By a statute of Ann, relating to the Bank of England, it was enacted that it should not be lassfisl fur any body of persons, consisting of a greater nunr ber than sig. to borrow, o+ e, or take up any money on a bill of exchange, at a less period than six months. Now the Company consisted of more that, sir perions, and the bill was drawn at less than six moaths. It was, thetefore clear upon the face of it, that it bad been ir tegularly drawn, and consequently could not be re covered on. In cases where a partnership existed, and the number of persons composing that partnership was unknown, if a bill of this kind drawn by them had been received for a valuable consideration, the person taking it, not knowing that thee were more than six persons concerned, it bad been held, that the bill would not be void, and that the party might tecover upon it. But it had also been decided, that where the number of per sons appeared on the face of the bill, or where the party taking the bill'knew that there were more than six persons, then the bill would be void. The Learned lien airman would prove that the plaintiffs must have been aware.nf there being more than six persons in this Company; for be would proJnce a newspaper which they would be proved to be in the constant habit of reading, in which was an advertisement with the names of upwards of a dozen directors. He submitted, diet on this ground alone the defendant would be entitletlto, ' a verdict. In the next place, he contended that the do-1 cement in question was neither a bill nor a note—to save been either of these, it must have been signed by each individual of the Company, or by some one person specifically appointed by them. This was not the case here, however; the bill was accepted by the secretary in the name of the Company. Now, it was necessary that it should have been tither in his*own, as specially appointed, or else in the name of each member. In conclusion, l:e insisted that the company was a bubble and a fraud from beginning to end ; that Messrs. Magor and Co. were notihe real plaintiffs in the case, but that the directors were; and that this was an endeavour to throw the burden lions their own shoulders, and cast it upon the unfortunate shareholders. He should prove teat the defendant, on being called on by the directors Ito make a further payment, refused to do so, on the (pound that the Company originated in fraud; that the lavecturs brought an action to enforce payment, and that the defendant was unsuccessful in that cause. It was upon that the present action was brought, which he repeated was at the suit of the directors. Under these circumstances, he thought the plaintiff could have no right whatever to recover. A number of the lirest Briton rend Cornwall Adver tiser, dated the 29th of April, 11325, and containing the advertisement alluded to, was then put in and read. It was agreed that the evidence given in the defence of the case of " Ellis v. Schmeick and another" should be received in this. The defendant's attorney proved the action against the defendant to have been tried in the King's Bench; but in cross-examivation admit ed that the facts of the case were not gone into, and that the case went off on a legal objection. Mr. Sergeant WILDE having replied, Mr. Justice GASELIER summed up, leaving it to the Jury to say whether they believed the Company to be a fraud and a bubble, and whether the directors sseie the real plaintiffs m the case. The Jury having retired for a short time, returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the lull amount claimed 3001. giving it as their opinion, that the Company was a timid and a bubble, but that the plaintiffs were not cognizant of it, and that Messrs. Magor and Co. were the teal plaintiffs in the case? SECONDARIES OFFICE, OCT. 26. Mr. Cao - w — TSiaa, the Secondary, having summated a Jury of respectable ttadeinnen to attend -upon a is: it of inquiry, stated that he had summoned them in con formity with Mr. Peel's Act. Julies are, therefore, henceforward , to be chosen as Juries at Nisi Pries are. The Secondstiy is determined, however, that the change shall be attended with as little inconvenience as possi ble to the Gentlemen summoned. Datemws“. V. EARL AND WIIITEIVICIC. This was rather a singular case of assault. The da- mages were laid at 1501. Mr. Bramwell, a Gentleman of considerable pro per ty, is the owner of about thirty houses at Tunbridge Wells, which houses he lets out to lodgers in the season. As some of the houses were unoccupied, he hired the wife of Baal to answer any inquiries that might be made about them, at the salary of 101. per annum. bitse, however, found a more profitable employment in the capacity of cook, and he was compelled to engage an• other person, the condition annexed to the payment of the salary being completely disregarded. Her husband, however, insised upon the payment of the demand, which was resisted, and he took out a writ on the 4.11 of May against Mr. Bramwell. At a quarter past ten o'clock that Gentleman heard a loud knocking at his door, and when he opened it ; in rushed the twu defer dams, neither of whom is either a Sheriff's of a police Wilm s and collared him, saying, " You are our pri 'Man" "For what?" said Mr. Bramwell ; "to wuich they' replied, " For a considerable amount." They then called aloud for a Sheriff's officer 'named Hoskin& out be did not arrive for some time, and When he dM, in stead of walking in at the hall door, re mounted in at 'the window. AU this was the more alarming, u the house was in almost total darkness at the time. 'But 'the apprehension for personal safety was not the only matter of annoyance. 'lt was rumoured about Tunbridge Wells, which is'asgossipping tnd calumniating-a little place as caw be found, that Mr. Bramwell's circum- ... : • • • Watts acre no beast than *up should be. An on iprecedented act was. committed in tbaiminediate ee simed bi Kistg's taxes, in seasequence ts( this report. cad farailies were etteid o tab. up their. abode in she houses of a man who li.ad wired hismielf toile dtagged :boat for the paltry sae of la due to tisa paOr %%Oman who was appointed so witch his preasioraa. so %bet, in stead of secais,ing $l3Ol. ea wee as she eseclusirus of the season, he found himself mower of ao move than .501.4froms the produce of kis SO Woos. Who defeadaoss adsaiswei that they had 110 aetherity for toacbiag Bramwell,. sad abe,iberiE's °dicer, when he arrived, wesslelnost isitempam alt. It was atillaeseedy proved that Mr. Bramwell was, when this , 'mentalism; y proceeding was resorted to against him, perlectly sober. There was no defence. The SECONDARY, in nsonairsg up, mated it was se knowledged these was no authority for entering the plaintiff's house and seizing his person; and the case was greatly aggravated by des fact that the aggression had been committed under theselour of right. It was evident that any report don the eakulated to throw • blemish upon a man's solvency, would deter families from residing on his premises, as they mast be on con. stant apprehension of some annoyanee or other. The Jury assessed The damages at 1001. After thew case was disposed of, sine of the Jury asked the Secondary whether be knew why die defendants did not attend to their defence? Mr. CROWT*III said, that the distance was coander. able, and they were probably poor. A Juryman wished so be informed why as assault, which had been cemnskted at such a distance, was tried in the City of London Mr.CnowTsaa said, that the Attorney.Cieneral made , the thing as sonvenient es pcherble to hatneelf. *ad had it tried where he piqued. The Jery observed, vet y naturally, tint such a prat lice must be ruinous in a long cause. POLICE INTELLWECNS. NAN Yesterday a househoiZwassansmose --. before the Loan Maws for having refused to pay a tomcods, who attended at the house, for extinguishing a fire. The complainant stated that Ise - weut to the Meuse upon hearing that there was a fire, and open gobs upstairs be found a room full of smoke. He had done what was necessary in earning tit* COI*, &C. The defendant said that the fire was extingtodsed before the complainant made his hppearance, and that ail he might have done was of no service. The Loan Naves !audible statement confirmed by a witness; and the complainant, 4 answer to a question from kis Lordship, said, that be did not know whether or nut the fire was extinguished before he reached the premises. The Lose klaeoe—There has been.* palpable want of diligence Isere, and I shall make no order against the dot/Want. Mr. Hobkr observed, that he had paid 10a. to a turneecls one* who swore that 'hate had been a firs at his house, and that be laid on the water; and it was roved afterwards that theta bad been neither fire nor water—(A laugh).—Tbe turucuck was, however, sent about his business. Mr. Sprat*, the landlord of the Hale-lot-the wall, Fleet-street, was I surumused for having kept open hit house after reasonable bourse's Saturday night, the sOth instant. Carlile, the patrol, and another, stated that they observed two Men and a wumbn go up the court at twenty minutes past twelve. They afterwards saw the door ors, and mine persons within • the done was , however, saint in their faces, and the landlord refased.to admit them, although they raid that they were officers. The defendant said, that he had closed bis door at twelve, and never drew a drop afterwards ; that there were no persons is kb house except those of his family, and that any person who walked up the court must have gone to some other haute in it. His waiter swore to the truth of this deface, and the charge was dismissed ; his Lordship at the same time stating, that public houses must close on Saturday, as WA as Odin Diets at I I o'clock. GUILDHALL. Tuesday afternoon, after hr. ilderin Senate', bad retired from the Justice-room at Geileibalk the Overseen of Crippiegate attended, to apply for a warrant to apprehend a man who lived in Golden-lane, on suspicion of having sold the corpse et his deceased wife to the resurrection men. They said the practice of stealing or buying corpses, before interment, bad existed to • shameful extent lo their pariah ; and they considered themeekwe bound to attempt to repress it by etpasure, if they were unable to bring posigment arm the parties. The defendant lodged next door to a notorious resurrection man, and his wife died on Sunday of a consplaint in the head. Os Monday he came to the overseers, and, ptotesting he mein extressedistress, obtained from them a grant of a shell. Tint manse night he got drunk with the resurrection-man and his friends. and on the following morning he left his apartment Rio which the carper was lying), as early as half-past four o'clock, giving the key of the room to the re surrection-man's wife, and leaving she street doer spa. The watelt. men saw two men lurking about, and at =early War thebody was missed from the shell, anti there were no marks of violence upon the room door. When the husband was informed of the circumstance at the shop where he works, be neither put on a show of surprise nor concern, but kept on at his labour, coolly remarking to the Ws* meager that be could cot help it, or something of that kind. Islr. Payne, the clerk, replied, that it was coutrary to the prat- I tics of our law to draw the evidence to convict a man out of Ms I own mouth. Where a body was dug up from the graved an overt act was committed, which would form a ground fur the taming a warrant to apprehend the offender; bat here the bosband had not I committed any overt act. The selling of the body was undoubtedly l an act of gross indecency, for which be might be punished, but the circumstances stated amounted to suspicion only, and We positive proof that he bad e° offended. ROW.STREET. Yesterday morning Messrs. Cribb, Richardson, Machin, ad Goatiewespectable inhabiraots of the parish of St. Paul, Corot Garden, and all of them filling parochial offices of i came to this Office; and Mr. Cri►b, addressing Sir Tlictuaa Besets, said," We have done ourselves the honour of waiting open yea, Sir Richard Binge, in consequence of statements which haws appeared recently in the newspapers, charging us wish neglect of onr duty with respect to the disorderly houses which *lnfos-moat* rein in this parish. The whole blame of sufering these houses to continue Goes, is, by the newspaper reports from this base, charged upon the parochial authorities, when in fact no Wan whatever is fairly attributable 40 us, for we have used every exertion in our power to put them down. In my capacity as Cluatchwarden last year, I presented all the disorderly houses that were reported to me, and commenced proceedings is the Ecclesiastical Court against them, but I failed. I was told that there was no law existing which would antlimite me to enter the booms or disturb thous, ex cept by indicting them at the Sessions upon good epidemic; and dim that Court had no power whatever to interfere. We are may willing to do all in our power to remedy the evil. Mr. Cribb ►ere handed a Morning d'aper, of Saturdaylast, Richard, cootaiaing a report of the cam from this Offiest r in which ' the Chief Magistrate wasstated to have cost some censure upon the parish officers for not taking steps to close the houses complained of. Sir R. Bunt said, the statement was perfectly correct ; and he repeated, that the parish officers ought to put a atop to such abomi nable nuisances. Mr. Ai Richard ? how are we to close share Mows, &r Sir It. limine—Why indict diem, to be sure. Mr. Richardson—l are sure the parish are anxious to do any thing the Magistrates will do us the honour to point out. Mr. Cribb—We haue - repeatedly given in to our Vestry Clerk, Mr. Roche, to indict the boyars, but be hoe said Immesh' not promed fur want of .suifieient evidesoe. Mr. punter, serving in his own right, who was repeatedly in one of those tosses at three and four o'clock in the morning, and could have proved a complete case, when called upen to indict, refused to become a public in former. Thus, you see, Sir Richard, the dlikulties we have to encounter, and in that report you roundly doer es with salliast ' of duty, and say 'beldame is ours. 1 Sir R. lizassz...rA.tid so it b.—Too want and ought to establish a better system of r watabg. The watchmen oT this parish are the Worst I ever *Dew. There orseo as sake and responedgeinepec-, tor at the heed of the mach, who will be en the aim Mt night ions' and compel the watchmen to do their duty. Alr. Ricbardscm.—We should be glad to appoint site, or half a dozen, but we have not the fluids. The Gentlemen bt;;rd ---- aa wittdoesr. It that 1111/ Gamlen should be warding oft their part us remedy the atisesoccap4eirtod et. kt iiTTON-G AXIOM Henry Jalopy' was charged by Maria Hann% Lgihonl beg" manufacturer, with an assault, on Thursday MEM. Prisonvt. Witt). went into the shop under pretence of asking theywie* of bonnets. w ushered into the show-town, where, rtntliti tiattlie young wrw-' 'min was alone, he' attempted to take impinpet+ Writes with tier penult. lier cries brought to her assistance the nett door neigh- • bout. when the prisoner was taken into custody. Ltoxicatioa 1 4 urged is ueber.t..-Ordereti r linitgood bail bIAtiI.BOIIOI.I.GII.STREUT. Yesterday, J . :siert& Wks* Ana, well known to the pe ce ocean u an old offender, was placed at the bee, charged wi t i, steslitig a pia of printed mace, tweetpeight yerds in leng t h, N it the of Weirs. Jemmy sod Cs. Ilnendrapers, of Ca mp . towstatet. sack Mr. Petite, • stationer, keing opposite t Messrs homy to Co. &paged to teeing the primmer, he company with another yaw l man, welkin to and from the opppodhe tide of the way, as ka lam standing at hie amip4mr, gym eight ed'xig rit , rdal wombe Witte* watched the primmer, when presently he saw him oft& • a piece of csitco front the top of a pile of goods Kandla etti, door, and putting it under his coat, walked off with glow follo4red and wised the primmer, with the cloth on Ma. John Pack, shores= to Mars. honer, identified the clothe being his master's prepetty. Primmer said he found the c l o th in the street. . _ He was fully committedfoc triaL A Air. Demetriusde Waits. a Gasman of respectable appea ls * was brought Op from St. James's wetchboase, cheesed witk lees smelted a respectable elderly Lady, Mrs. Hardt% residing in St: Jesneee-plice. lase. Harding awed that the defendant had taken a hrnisked boose of her, and she had not bad bias lung as a tenae t b r f ore she rel.,' pawed hav in g 1 4 , e Ms gate possession. Her suspi c i ons Were cured by the reports of the nalisbours,who stated that they had seta tiger `sowed freer the beam at diisrent times, and they could wasebta payment of the bills which t h e prisoner had contacted witkahats; The defendant washout to spit, abbough be owed hi some ram said in consequence she went to the bassi to see that her goods were safe before hr left. She enet the defendant in the hall; sad an shut the street door, to pc his leaving before she had aarniesdaa premises ; upon which the defendant struck her a vidam k4w b, the face which had blackened one of her eyes. The defendant said that the amount be owed was but Si. that lee considered the had no right to detain hiss, sad denied having eta her at all. Mr. Cosawr, the presiding Magistrate, said that Mrs. Hulse was not justified in detainlug the defendant, but umatheirst Se, the defendant, was Dot ezeasad by ads am in striking hits Harding, for wbiah assault be must Sad belle—Mr. de Wits was cletaissil in default of bail. Al A RY-L 4110 N N IL Wiliam Alen, a rang man ' who. by his own confusion, was liberased from risen yesterday monism, was almost iiuswilitely afterwards placed at the bar of this Office, and durged ern [okay: under the following neraordinmy eiremnstasom•-- As Gibbs, the officer, passed *soon Marploisamoe-hoe, st is *knelt, an duty, a rimbee-miennan, who was staadhig at ha g aur. said, `. Gibbs, that yoong man," pointing is the prisoner, *Mtn me aloe months age eta pair at trowoors--1 love net aim bias ince, hot lam sere he is the same t If you like, yea way kick kim back, and we will hear what be says." The Olean appeared to be aware of what was gang on, for be no away. Gibbs followed him, apprehended Wm, and brought him back. When they sound Mtn, they found a new pair of blue cloth moron in his hat, he had that Inman seeks is the shop of Mr. LAINVAI. at SS, in the saute street. Is both eases, be sainted a snit of clothes, paid a &peek of le, narked shoo, and promised to call again, which gave kin as ep. portant y to steal the LIVIVIIef.. He will be re-examined ea Tamil. UNION-HALL. A man named Gorge Metes, a giase-blowee, ks the emplepaest of Mews. rellatt and Green, the gins manufacturers, mann* with having absconded Rom his work, contrary to his agreant. It appeared that the defendant had entered into a meow Vieth fur the inn for a period of live years. He remain nth them for one year, during which it was stated that be canna. average a weekly suns of 21.75. Considering, however, On be coyish eons even more at a large establishment newly set spite same line at Manchester, be absconded from his employes, at entered into a new engagement in that town. An of ins& patched after him, and be was taken into custody and bra* litui tuts cake. . _ An ezpen se of upwards of 151. was incurred in appodwallaglio, 0f124 which he was ordered to repay his employers by weekly stsimeots, or be committed for three tomtits to bud hear. A LARGI FAIIIILYOO looking through the Ap. pendia to the Emigration Report, we were struck with the exhibition of a fact, which we think will be equally surprising to our readers. There is a hit indicating the number of applications, and the description of persons who applied. From this list we extract the following itenas-- 0 Sept. 1896.—EThe names of iodisiduals .applying for aid are properly enough omitted.]—The .man is described as a Chelsea pensioner, sad his fa mily are stated to be seven wives, nineteen soot, dimes daughters." MARRIED. The 14th Joshua, at 3t. Andrew's, Holborn, Mr. T. Duo, bestseller. Hobart. to M i mood daughter of Mr. Win Parroas. Bedfard4trolt, DIED. Yesterday, at hie house is Privy Gardens, the Earl a( Parkrele and Montgomery, aged 66. The 35th October, at Frankfort on the Woe, General WM Murray, Bart. Colonel a< the 56th Regiment. At Twkkitabans,tn the 14th year of her age, Lady Framers One Douglas, Iftle ctanghte: of the Marvels of gneemberl• At the Manse of Unwary, on tb• fd inst. aged 95 warn Rev. Paul Fraser, D.D. /Unless: of Luray, the father d* Church of Scotland. The 11th August, at Port Royal, Jamaica, aged 20, the 110 Matthew St. Clair, Lieutenant eth Regiment, second am of Ind Sr. Clair. PIIIIVIGATE ow, LUADENHALL MARKETS, ck Beef. lts od to 42 Od I Veal Mutton .. . ... Os Id to 3.10 d Pork ?RIM or HAY AMP STRAW YESTBRDAI. mamas's. wurncsam c4l es Od to Si We Oil Ilay it tor to $1 0 1 01 * 41106 ad to al is. ad Clow 41 los to 61 0141 Straw tllos Od to 11 ltis od Straw 11 los to tl tool PRICE OF HOPS, PER CWT. an. It. nue mum szw &um Kett 711. to lifts I Kent ...... 70 s t° I t 4. Sews Uri Farnham fine 140 s to lios—rtisoods. 1031 to 1 301 Old Dety bid at 4140000. • PRICE OF LEATHER. Oast Dressing }Odes l3i4 to I7d Commie Dino t7d to lid Crop Hides, 55 to 401lis for cutting Ditto 45 to 50144 ...... ......... Cad' Skins, 56 to 401iss ......... Ditto 50 to 70Ibs Ditto 70 to 1101bs Small Seals, Gromili0d).... Towed Bone Hides l4d to MI *wish Horse Hides... .... ........= iid to 174 .----. Town Tab3 PR w ICK or TALLOW SOAP Ike. per l iggo. esis od )(akar Soap ............ toe Yellow Russia ... White ditto ..... .... .. —s Od Curd .. ............... .. 0 9 °I Soap ditto —l Od Graves... .............. 20s N Melting Stu, Sis Od Goad Dregs .... ..... 5 ' Tallow imported bum 111L•Puliankurs11, dd cask' Ditto p si, moan 191 auks. COURSE OF RX i Amsterdam --as 3 -C.F. Ditto atoll* 1$ 0 Rotterdam... 2 U It 4 Antwerp Haniburgh Altona 2/ U 34 Li Paris,3day'saiobt 45 35 Ditto ..... ....$ U 15 09 Madrid .154 Cadiz 220 Barcelona ........344 Bilboa.—... ...... ..351 ',CHANGE, OCT. N. Sevilla .... 34 Glbrakar........ 46 iLeArhoro ...... 471 Genoa ..... .45 60 ......... 46 Malta .• Naples ........... 341 Palermo ........ 1 iS id pet 4 1 Li5b0n.......... 471 Rio Janeiro..... 31 ......... . it C0ak......• MAILS-1 e i sa. par. 1 0 lIS DAY. Asa. tot Franca 0 I hmlourg 0 0 FLlnders• 0 0 Sweden 0 0 Leeward Islands 0 0 blowl 0 eo 0 0 0 Brawl iiiater - f“rd kii..tnaci and Jersey 0 0 Lisbon 0 0 Donaghadee 0 0 Buenos Are 0 0 Wood . 1 0 'ALIO W Anit at LONDON-MUDGE TO bac:loom Mooing m mutes alter 8 'MG M'S mmutcs ate 9 Printed and Published by Joss MATNI, theiCiPnglig Inannot at dal &as °lrma, No. 1, Pickett-place, Taropte.Dar. 1 0 , - A s .1 , 1 A . 1 'lt /6 1 Nee ',ll MI A 11 .1 Ws iv is •• - r I * 01 aip. 2 vo , 1 x:1 , A 1 t il di i t so 1 ell e els a I,: . Al lit's 1 Z. P r C. i X 1 I J. 1 A' IL i A. i Y. Ms As i . . i r se, e Ai 1 Pr j. I r s Ha e lai . Jol 1 NI Mr Me T.. M I, r o B . B. - Cos Via t ILI F., s CIS ILA * P.= 1111 it laii • II iill rd PA nil Aa i Na JIL lir se se d AL *Jai d /d a<! !i Itii li Ma kw 314 i ..-r , • I 04 ids ... We id I" el IA a 0, . ..... 3 ... add PO IN Ms esti