Star. — London, England, 1827-06-28 00:00:00

•~ 1 s ~l ~ ' • LAW INTELLICENCL, • COURT OF CHANCERY, Jaws . Tha.Court having disposed of some lunatic ped • proceeded to hear counsel in the cause of MORRIS AND DAVIS. Mr. TAUNTON, MI. CAMPBELL, and Mr. Unmoor* who were Counsel in the trial of an issue directed trove the Coen of Chancery, argued upon the application for a new trial. The facts have been detailed before, and . the question turned upon the legitimacy or illegitimacy of the plaintiff, who was born while his mother and her husband were living apart. -The argument was not fi nished at the rising of the Court. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Juan THE EAST INDIA COMPANY V. CAMFION, BAZETT, AND OTHERS. Mr. HORNE said he wished to address a few observa tions to his Honour with reference to this case. A re port of what had occurred when the case was last be fore the Court bad appeared in the newspapers; and as Certain expressions in that report appeared to have wounded the feelings of the Learned Judge of whom they were said to be spoken, it was but right that the matter should not go unexplained. The Learned Gen-, tleman went on to observe, that he had made a motion , the object of which was, that the Learned Judge allud.l ed to might be applied to for his notes of a trial which came on before him, in order that this Court might be put in a situation to judge whether or not a new trial should be granted ? He (Mr. Horne) was so little accuse towed to prepare what be intended to . speak, that he, could not charge his memory with the precise words I which he used on that occasion ; but of this he was sure, that if be could have made the attack reported in the, newspapers, it would have been most wanton and called for. He, in fact, had nothing to do on the oc-I casion but simply to apply to the Cow for the notes cti the triartaken by the Learned Judge, and he stated to I his Honour that an issue had been directed upon a bill of interpleader, that the question was one of law merely, and that the amount of the lien claimed had nothing' whatever to do with it. He certainly remembered tee, have added, that the practice of this Court did not ap pear to be understood by the Court below. In the re port in the papers something was represented to him fallen from him imputing peevishness or soreness to the Learned Judge in question. He (Mr. Horne) hoped, however, that his Honour remembered enough of the proceedings on that occasion to do him the justice ol say that he had not so expressed himself. He certairslrl recollected saying, that the short-band writer's notes, were referred to, and that they reported the Ltarneill Judge to have said that nothing had been tried but his patience ; but by this expression he meant nothing die- 1 respectful to the Learned Judge in the way it appeared in the papers. He must however say, that some diffi culty attended the manner of reporting the conversation which took place at the time alluded to, as, in fact, it parto&k more of a dialogue with his Honour than any thing else. The Learned Gentleman then said, that he had nothing now to do but to repeat what he bad al ready done to the Learned Judge in private—namely, that nothing was farther from his intention than to make use of any observations that-'could be considered at all 'disrespectful to the Learned Judge, or to any other per son concerned at the ilia), in the way in which the re presentation—for he could not say misrepresentation— had been set forth. • His HONOUR said, that the objectionable paragraph had bees pointed out to him. He usually paid so little attention to what fell from Counsel with respect to the characters of persons, that he did not immediately To: collect the exact words used by Mr. Horne on the cc- casion alluded to. Having read the paragraph, how ever, he was free to confess that no expression in the offensive sense attributed in the newspapers to Mr. Horne had been used by him, and he was quite sure that no Gentleman connected with that Court would express himself in disrespectful terms with respect to the members of any other Court. Mr. Houma said it was quite impossible he could have meant any such thing, for when the subject was first mentioned some time since, be told his Honour that the parties would admit the shott-hand writer's notes, but that it would not be quite respectful to the Learned Judge to use them, unless he were asked psi forma by his Honour's officer for a copy of the note which he had taken at the trial. The YICE CHANCELLOR observed, that during the' time that Mr. Horne was talking of what bad occur. red in the Court below, he was considering whether the issue had been properly shaped by counsel in this Court, so as to have led to a misconception in the Court below. His Honour said certainly, that some thing in the way of a sleight-of hand appeared to have been practised by the opposite party. MI. HOENE remembered his Honour to have said so, and he himself also remembered to have said that his learned friends, the Sergeants, appeared not to know exactly what the practice of this Court was. The Vica CHANCELLOR said, he was sure that the hibit of reporting the proceedings that took place is Courts of Justice in all cases that were decided, was useful to the public; and he was convinced it would' not he less useful if whatever of a personal nature that might happen to occur in the course of the proceed. ings were omitted in the Reports. HARRIS R. KEMELE. Mr. Teets; applied to his . Honour on behalf of the defendant in this case, that the motion for a rehearing might be advanced. The petitioner declared that he was considerably embarrassed by the decision of his Honour's predecessor, and the numerous creditors claiming on the joint property were in a condition of doubt and uncertainty, until the rehearing should take ' place. Mr. SUGDEN slid he appeared, strongly to oppose this application, and he hoped that his Honour would not hold out any hopes to the petitioner that there was anything in his case to induce the Court to grant him the indulgence which he sought. The petitioner had • no right to expect that his motion should be advanced above other suitors, to their prejudice ; let him wait his turn. The case had been folly argued for seven days before his Honour's predecessor, and the petiti n. r evi dently wished to take the chance of a new Judge, a judgment having been pronounced against him ; and this indulgence he seemed to claim merely because he was the holder of a theatre. His Howoua ob:ei red, that as soon as the further directi.ins were got thri.ugh, it would then' be the proper time for him' to consider the question of rehearing. Motiop refuse& tooRT op KING'S BENCH, Jame 47. ' rinKINIIOI.. THE CORPORATIftI Or LIVERPOOL.- . _ Thst.vral an appeal. from an order of Session, where it was adjudged that the defendants, who were the 1 • 1! ... i f 1 AO I i !' k Il i I l i ii• 1 1 it '(1 ; 11 ' 1 i . 1 . 1 1 .". r F 1 i '! •ii ',. r !1) . , iti) . i, / i 1 I , II : I ~ -,. I . i'" - . ~ . , 1 : 4 i 1 1 , - 1 1 . li ..i..• ',, . . ~.. . . -•sp . ...;,. ....., t .... '7ltP trustees of the new Liverpooblietbs, were not liable be riled to the poor's rates. in reslpetrof ter in fin belonging to them. and of certain other lands the rented, in which they were, under the authority of a local Act, constructing docks. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL and Mr. GRROSON, for the defendants, in support of the order, argued that' the land was not rateable, because there was an ab.enee of all beneficial occupation, the profits not going into the pockets of the defendants, but being laid out for the completion of the docks. The ATTORNEY•GLNERAL and Mr. J. Wit.t.taxe, for the appellants, contended that land covered svith s builds logs was emphatically within the statute of Elizabeth; and this land was not shewn to be exempt from the' neral operation nt the statute. The defendants were building docks, and to enable them to do so they hail exercised the power of laying on certain dock duties. This created a profit, and it was no gr 'um! of exemp tion that the expenses of any particular year might absorb the profits of that year. The COURT decided that the order of Session should be confirmed. There was nu distinction between land owned and land hired. Meeting-houses and other places of worship were not rateable, where the pews were not let. The trustees were not occupiers of the land within the meaning of the statute of Elizabeth, because they derived no benefit from the land, which, in tact, was occupied by the public, and for public purposes alone, land therefore was not rateable. THE XING 9. RAMBDZN AND CLARKS. These defendants were brought up to receive the judgment of the Court upon an indictment for a con spiracy, on which they were found guilty at the sittings after last Easter Term, in London, before Lord Ten terden. The indictment charged the defendants, and others who were acquitted, with conspiring to defraud the creditors of Ramsden, by suing out a fraudulent commission of bankrupt against Ramsden and Clarke; and there was also a count charging them with con spiring tn sue out a fraudulent commission for the pur pose of defrauding the creditors of Ramsden. Lord TENTEassm read the notes of the trial, which was reported in our Paper of June 4, after which Mr. F. Pow.ocx and the Comstom-Senoxater, by leave of the Court who had ordered the matter to stand neer, were heard in behalf of the defendants, who applied fee a new trial, on the ground that evidence had been improperly received. Tne 96th section of the last Bankrupt Act provides, that no commission of bank ruptcy. adjudication, assignment, or certificate, should be received as evidence unless entered of record. The commission was not produced at the trial, nor was it enrolled, and, in consequence, the Attorney-General gave up the first count of the indictment, and relied solely on the second, which charged the defendants with conspiring to sue out a commission ; and, .to prove this conspiracy, he offered in evidence the assignment by the Commissioner; which bad been enrolled; and. Lord Tenterden, after argument, admitted it. Mr. Pott.ocx, for Captain Ramsden, now contended, that the assignment, although enrolled, was not evi dence; because the commission not having been en rolled, the officer had no authority to enroll the assign ment. It had been offered to confirm the testimony of Smallwood, who had acted as assignee under the com mission. , There was at attesting witness to the assign ment, who was-called for other purposes, but had not been examined as to the assignment, the execution of which had not been proved. The evidence was rep ceived at the peril of those who required it. The Ad judication, and other proceedings under the bank. ruptcy, were also received in evidence, and were open to the same objection. Mr. Justite BAYLiT, asked how the evidence was. tesiakon a charge 'to - itre out the commission ? Mr. Por.z.oc.r..—We cannot speculate on the value of the testimony i it was produced to confirm the evi dence of Smallwood, a person who was indicted with the defendants, and was acquitted for the purpose of making him a witness, and who began his testimony by . an avowal of his own guilt ; and there was every pro bability that the Jury would not have believed ilk evi dence if it had not received that confirmation. It was impossible to say that it did not produce material of--' lest; and if it was not strictly admissible. Captain Earns den was entitled to a new trial. The COMMON SZRGIANT. for Clarke. argued, that as the commission was not produced, the assignment was the act of strangers, the Commissioners being no par ties to the indictment. The ATTORNEY GINERAL and Mr. GI7RNET, for the prosecution, contended, that the Act of Parliament pre vented the commission and assignment being evidence in case they were not enrolled, for the support of any proceeding founded upon the commission; but did not prevent their being evidence on a charge like this of fraudulently issuing the commission ; and compared it to the case of a forged bill of exchange, written upon a wrong stamp, where the bill, nocwithrtanding the defect of the stamp, might be given in evidence against the person indicted for forging it. Mr. PoLLoce and the Custsiox•Seastaxt were heard in itply. The Count deferred pronouncing their opinion. At the rising of the Court, Lord TENTIREZN said that the Court would proceed on the new trials to-morrow, after the motions on the special paper on Friday; and that on Saturday they would not take any Crown case, but proceed on the new trials. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JuNz rt. This morning a further addition was made to the number of Sergeants at Law, by the admission of Messrs. Scriven, Stephen, and Bampus, to the dignity of that office. Having gone through all the customary formalities, they took their seats within the bar, below those who were appointed ors Monday. THWAITES V. FOSTER. The defendant in this case was brought up, charged in execution, and made a personal application to the Court for a rule to chew cause why the proceedings in this case should not be set aside, on the ground that he had not received good notice of trial. To support this application he put in an affidavit, in which he swore, that having employed the plaintiff as an attorney, he had become indebted to him, but that the plaintiff had commenced acs action, and obtained a verdict against him, without giving him proper notice of trial. The COURT, upon the strength of this affidavit,-im mediately granted ti .e rule to shew cause. Mr. Foster theninquited of heir Lordships in what manner he should again pre.ent himself before them? Having been for 16 months in confinement, his circuits. ta nue were so seduced, that he was totally ii:capabl• of employing Counsel. Mr. Sergeant TADDY rose at this instant, and wa. about to speak, when Tlx LORD CHM' Justice interrupted, and said, I see my brother 'faddy has anticipated what 1 was about to ssy, that I was emordsioallThioy dewiness presmit.l -Would *oder' a persostill jot* tretilnittinees'e•erfsei-1 vice in his:plosier, and you Infght take your choice of as gdotid ti bar as any in England" Hat iag exptessed his thanks to the Court, and to. Mr. Sergeant 'faddy, Mr. Foster railed. The Court directed that the plaintiff should shew csiute pereinptorily on Tuesday pest. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Jess 27. PREACH OP PR"MIER Or IIARRIACIP. 001::...H V. PARR. The plaintiff in this case is the daughter of a Dissent ing Clergytnan, residing and officiating at Tetbury, in the county of Gloucester. About three years ago he kept a school at Bristol, where a brother of the defen dant's being placed under his tuition, led to an intimate acquaintance between the two families. The plaintiff was described as being 24 years of age, of great prrsonal beauty and accomplishments, who had for a consider able time superintended the education of the children of the Hon. Mrs. Noel. The defendant is the son of a respectable silversmith in Bristol. At the time when the courtship commenced between the parties, the de fendant was a widower, 35 years old, and had a child by his former marriage. In May 1826, the plaintiff being on a visit to the house of the defendant's father, in Bristol, received such a degree of attention from the defendant, as left no doubt upon her mind of his attachment to her. The result of this impression was, that before leaving Bristol, she addressed a note to him, in which (after stating that she knew not how to apologise for at all writing to him under such cir cumstances) she confesses that their acquaintance had excited in her mind feelings which it was impossible to describe; that if the affection were not mutual, she begged that he would at least acquaint her will that distressing fact. and would also destroy the communication which she had been induced to make of the state of her feelings. To this letter, the defendant replied, that the attachment was mutual, and his love, for her unbounded; and from this period, a corres pondence was carried on between them until the sth of July, from which day the defendant, Without having assigned any reason, put an end altogether to the ac quaintance. After various efforts had been made by the young jaady, as well as by her father and another friend, to induce the defendant to perform the engage ment into which he had entered, an action was brought at the Spring Assizes at Gloucester, which was tried before Mr. Sergeant Bosanquet during the illness of Baron Garrow. The Jury, at that trial, gave the plain. tiff 2501. damages. Upon a former day, Mr. Sergeant, Ludlow obtained a Rule Nisi, for a new trial, and yes terdiy Mr. Charles Phillips :hewed cause against the Rule, and read extracts from several of the defendant's letters, in which he declared that the plaintiff was the counterpart of his deceased wife, and the only person in the world who could fi ll up the blank, which the, unfeeling hand of death bad made in his happiness, by depriving him of his former spouse. The correspond ence contained numerous professions of unalterable at. taament and inviolable constancy. Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW supported the Rule. on the ground that the damages were excessive, and the con.' duct of the Lady more forward than became her sex and situation. The Covet. unanimously were of opinion that tbe , verdict ought not to be disturbed, and thought the, damages rather too small than too large. With regard' to the young Lady, the Court were all of opinion that there was not the slightest ground for imputing to her the least degree of impropriety, or unbecoming for wardness in any part of her behaviour. POLICE IN T ELLIGENCES MANSION-HOUSE. • A men named ad" who has been often pulled up" for pa bad money, was brought before the Looa Mato..yesterday, change passing with having practised his old trade. Mr. Caine, the proprietor of the French Horn public-house, in Cretchedfriare, stated, that the prisoner went into his house on Se turday evening, at about half past six o'clock, and called for a glass of beer, for which be paid with a half-crown; when witness gave him the change, the,prisoner threw a shilling to him, and asked him for another. This shilling was a bad one, and the witness was con. vineed that dte shillings which be had given in change were liner. , eeptionable. While be was hesitating upon the subject the owner of a neighbouring public house entered,srised the prisoner, and charged him with being a passer of bad money. An officer soon after search ecrhim, and found upon him several good half crowns, shillings sad nixpeoces, but no bad money. Near the spot, howeveei where he was apprehended, four bad shillings, wrapped up in a piece pf paper; was picked up. Mr. Whitehorn, the landlord of the Globe public-house, in Crutebedfrbrs, then stmed, that theta a fortnight ago the prisoner went to his house and asked for some trifling article, to pay for which he tendered half.a.erown. The witness gave him change, but the prisoner immediately threw a shilling to hint, saying that it was bad. Witness perceived that it was bad, indeed, and gave the prisoner a send one Instead of it. This encouraged the prisoner to make a second experiment. On Saturday evening he walked Into the house and asked for a glass of ale, and put down half-a.crown. Witness gave bins good change, upon which the prisoner threw over to him a bad shilling, saying that he objected to it, and must have another. The witness gave him webs Hat of it, and the pri. loner left the house. He, however, had not gone far, when the witness recollected his customer, and ran after him just as he was attempting at Mr. Caine's)touee to play ei a similar nick. The Loan Maros said that he considered the evidence quite con dense, and committed the prisoner for triaL • • GUILDHALL' Mr. Ambidge, of Newgate.anarket, spelled to Mr. Alderman HITIAATIN . yesterday, for a summons against Mr. Coohon, of the new Theatre of Anatomy, in Aldeesgatoetreet, that be might shew cause why he detained the MUSS of a pig which had strayed into the avenue to the theatre, and had .been shot by some of the pro fessional Gentlemen. He (Mr. Ambidge) had made application on Monday,when Mr. Alderman Ansley promised that an officer should call upon Mr. Coulson, and the result would be made known to him on the following day. On that day be, unfortunately, was too ill to attend; but be saw by the newspapers Mr. Coulson had appeared, and alleged that the pig was mad. Mr. Coulson bad said the same thing to him (Mr. Ambidge), and Imputed the malady to the animal having been hunted. Now be never yet heard tell of a pig running mad, and a Gentlema n by his side, who had had thousands and thousands of pigs through his bands, and was et' course well versed in the pathology of the race, would bear •irs..l timony to the same point. Sheep, bullocks, and horseiwould get crazy sometimes, from being overdriven ' and other. causes; but not so the pig. He did not deny that there had ever bee n such a thing as a mad pig, but then its madness must have arisen from bring bitten by a rabid dog. If Mr. Coulson had chucked a handful of corn down to the pig, its madness woultrhave been at an cud directly, and it would have eaten the corn Instead of biting the dog; but the truth was, that the poor thing got into a dangerous place—(A laugh).—lf it had run into any other house in Aldersgate•street, it would have come out alive. lie allowed he intended to have made posh of the carcase U be bad obtained it. Mr. Alderman HeroaTz asked if be had any authority in such a case? Mr. Payne, the second clerk, referred Mtn to the Ist Geo. IV. c. 56,by which any person who shall wilfully commit any damage, injury, or spoil , " upon real or personal property of any nature or kind soccer,' may be apprehended by the owner, or under bis authority, without any warrant, and the Justice shall cause the of fender to make reasonable satidsctinn, not exceeding £5. Mr. Alderman Fihroara looked cautiously through this statute, and found in one of the latter clauses, that it was not to extend to any case where the justice was satisfied that the party complained against acted under a fair and reasonable supposition that he had a right to commit the act complained of. " This, - said the Alder• man," exactly bits my idea nt the fad ing mulct which Mr. Coohoti has acted, and I cannot, therefore, illitticlej but you have still a, _ . remedy by action, If you change to puma h." Mr. Ami,i,l l ,, then retired. MAR LBOROUO H-STREET. Yesterday Willie's Yeast, a coachman In the serviceof Re try Brougham, gsq. M.P. was brought to this dice open a wattle before H. M. Urea, Esq. the sitting NlAgistrate, charged with e a , nutting Ballard; one of the nificers b.-tonging to this establish tttetn It appeared that on the night of the 25th inst. his Royal the Dyike.of Clarence gave a stand rout, at his resids nee at miralty, on which occasion the crowd uf:cistieges was Se great the polleeeslicers found the utmost difficulty witetpu i tft e boa.---• The defendant, who drove Mi. Brougham"' cartage, when coot, vented to be set right in the carriage -rank by' d, l a d" severely with his whip. _ . . . . _ The charge having been - sworn to, the defendant was arthritic find b ail , and detained until he could procure it ; but lest 144, 0, don should be attended whk any inconvenience to Mr. gie ug h m, his servant's being in custody, and to say, diat ooff i the Magistrate addressed a letter to that Gentleman to appri ze hi m of weed for the mans appearance at a future titlie, enter ft* l kik he should be forthwith discharged. On the receipt of this letto%* Mr. Brougham nine direct to the office, and after a fee *urea dy coevenation.wit► the Magistrate , entered into the neca iuty ,,,, mr. nihances, and the man was discharged. te to a a G C :t t le e m m i a n a Glan des~Sei L ac nacr e*, e, , co c a oa ch c at hm an an Awn Price, footman to the latter, were charged with obstructil the way of the Nobility and Gentry wise attended the pubic breli. fast gives on Saturday last at the Horticultutal Gardeut at Chip wick, and the first-named defendant was she charged with &inti ing Plank, the chief °Seer of-this office, who had the canton ofthe police an duty at the Gardens no this occasion. Thecharges n ue clearly proved against the defendants, and Cole was lined 'tor- be t h e og.tractlon, and held to bail for t ► e amen. Chandler meals fined 40s. and Price, whose conduct was not so bad nth, others, was discharged, on his expressing his ►egtet for what ►e had dole. HATTON-GARDEN. most elegantly attired . female, and her sae, a youth; abate eight years of age, were charged on suspicieo of stealing a Tastable gold watch and appendages. Prom the evidence of the complainant, a yoag Lady earned Phelps, it appeared that the individual surpect4, and whose connections are puticalady respectable, secured apartments n the house where she resided. On Tuesday aftesseon she turned home, after a short walk in the Regent's Park, aod placed her reticule, in which was the watch, ao a tattle in het drawing-roar. ' The boy entered the room with her, and after being there a 'bon time left her suddenly, and in a few mlueess she missed the watch front her MIMIC. Th e bey ► ad lies terrogited on the subject, previous to an Ohm being intro. . dueed, and had confessed having stolen the watch; but the state ments he gave were so contradictory, and at variance with each other, that be was reluctantly given in charge, preview t o which lie was or some done locked in his mother ' s apanmeho, and ou being again questioned, denied any knowledge whatever of the tras•.ae. tion. an being questioned by Mr. Rams, the child, in a very flippant manner, said that be had been frightened into the summon he had given, and that they were wholly devoid of truth. Weever saw the watch at all. The accused Lady, who was surrounded by her friends, would not condescend to offer any espLutatia2; bet Mr. Rimless said the case bad assumed a rather serious aspect, rod that until the various pawnbrokers in the neighbourhood had beta referred to, he must remand the prisoners, unless ample baillhould be given for their appearance on a future day.:llibelnzeiwbel;siti:dtet,ll.B44hil. LAM BETH-STREET. /ms Soienesent, the wife of They Selimeests, was yesterday broctle up and placed within the bar. Mr. Houruairs, the Macias, attended on her behalf, and contended, that no evidence had beet adduced stack= to convict her of hating feloniously obtained tie goods now in Court, amounting in value to more than 154:40 ;le therefore hoped that the Court would no longer detain tie pd . soner in custody, nor hesitate to deliver up the.property. *ram the Bitting Magistrate, replied, that with regard to the property, net one article should be given up till Mr. Saeger came and lawfully claimed it ; and he (the Magistrate) tboug'st that the abscondiog of Solomon' was a*corroborative poor tie the articles were obtained feloniously by him, and nut by tie prisoner at the bar, who be desired should be discharged forthwith. Friday, the Mayor and Corporation of Dover, wee the boundaries of the Tbwn, which ceremony had on been performed for 28 years and upwards, since which period the Castle has been annexed to the Town and Pon, by Act of Parliament. On Mr. TURNER'S return from London to Shtiglel Park on Thursday week, he was hailed by every ffementratioa of joy by the inhabitants of liollingtna, Shrigley, and the neighbour. hood; and aimilar rejoicing was Likewise manifested on &mil , evening last, when bliss Taunts paused through tlsts-c is her return home. The bells of Shrigley church rang meetly. gags were displayed in various directions, and the crovkls who Indio gambled to greet her arrival, after the happy termination Si dot unfortunate affair which has so tong interested the public, their exultation byloed and hearty cheering.—Misechisieki Hata. As the Rev. Archdeacon BROWN was tonal Kb Nottingham, from Coterave on Monday morning last, wails servant, in a fourmiseekd simile, the hone, in passing art* North's toll.bar, on the Trent Bridge-road, became restive; a reared up, overturned the chaise, and falling back, was kilki upon the spin by the violence with which it came to the gravities Neither the venerable Archdeacon, nor his servant, experiencel any.injury whatever. Saturday three young Ladies belonging t Glaser, In taking an airing in a gig in the country, had a most nurse escape. The fair charioteer laid herself and her companions Girlf upon the ground ; however, though the carriage was compktely turned over upon them, with the wheels uppermost, and Ott horse' Is in the same situation, two of them were taken out unbert,but the third bad one of her legs broken. Two young Gentlemen who attended them had her taken to an lan in the neighbourhood, where the leg was set Sy a surgeon from Glasgow.—Gitlite*Og' PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. - - - Thomas &wash and John Smash, Bristol, shlsensaktes: Richard Riley and Joseph Holroyd, Halifax, Yorkshire, tailors. .101 6 Dean aed James Lsogbottom, Halifax, Yorkshire, Omer" John Hand and John Simmonds, Durham, paper rianseactatm. George Parkinson and John Yates, Shellield Yorkshire. 6k row factarsra. Julia Dear and Ann Graves, Homey, Mats, Mud labtresses. Robert Eingleton, Joseph Schofield, and Grace &be field, Ibncashire„ 'laminar'. Isaac Rainforest, ad John Naylor, Church-passage, Guildhall, woollendrapers. GeV Cape), Daniel Capri, and 8.. J. Bullock, Dyer's.eourt, Malcom* bury, 'Wok-sale tea dealers. A. Zimmeiater and William Plod, Duke-street. Manchester-square, stay and comet-makers. Ws Scott and John Scott, Earisheatoa, Yorkshire, manufactsrars. Jan Malin Schwieso and E. Serquet, Regent-street, harp-mato" W. M. Think= Ind A. U. Thiseitnn, Goodge-atreet, Thumbs" marammil, printers. W. Bock and William Lampert, Chelleaad nanuell.street, Goodnuekkelds, printers. G. Parnell and Go. Jersas Gmlimanrgh,'Lintfolnshire, sd►geoos. Richard itioadt and Joseph Walker • Tavistnek.street, Carew -gardens wwilfs' drapers. George A. Carnithers, Wan. &• Smith, W. lrlitandlo and ThomU Lancaster, Pernambuco„ merchants. MARRIED. By special Ueense, Oa the 26th inst. at Wards., Castle, the seat of the Right Hon. Lord Arundel, Edward Dooshrf, g01•° 198ar .,.; feed Hall and West Darkworth , in the county of litice' n • Hon Miss Catharine ArandeU, yoingest daughter o f the late, and Isister of the present, Lord Arundel. At Auchterusairole, on the 15th inst. the Rev. Robert awe, Minister of Largo, to &Limbed', daughter of the late Armor; Landis:, Brag. of Auchtermairnie. DIED. The 4th of March last, at C.trefs, Mrs. Forrest, wife of Meet Forrest, Bag. one of the Judges (t ithe Supreme Cora in the liras Islands. The list November last, at Brenda, in the East Indies, in* 20th year of his age, Lieut. John Chessbyre, of the 15th EO N ' Bombay Native Infantry,. 1116 Lai. MAILS— /ut. •us. • 1 0 Frantic 1 0 Hamburg 1 0 Flanders O 0 Sweden O 0 Maka 9 1 Leeward Islands 0 • Jamaica Dublin Water Led G...rnses and Jersey Lisboa Dosagbadee Buenos Ayres idolised As& I" 1 • O I 0 O I O e 0 • 0 .--- BT ( " 1 " 11 ' ATZR at LONDON-BRIDGE TO MORRO* Morning • 54 minute's atter 4 S Atteriscoms • • • 11 minute- alter 'AMMO*: Printed and Pubtlsaed by Jilila 11,11,111, the !woos at the Sus Oraecs.,No. 1, Pickttt•ptase, 'temple-IW. i 3~ .~ ir sam 11 wit *xi ir Tli St JE A. xi Mr