Star. — London, England, 1820-10-30 00:00:00

. • • N- 16":. • . . Le the teat was not 4 14 MHileallioned by Mr. Brougham,. 119 titjci or tice Mr.,Datman took of it, it was dwelt upon ee, a Nahic as nokcleatiy proved t but Dr. Lushing. ton - Idiotic f h clp'imd laboured with great vigour, though, in his mind, with no great effect, in defending it. But it was strange that the Learned Attorney-General of the Queen—he who had displayed such talent in his openin whose powerful mind had expanded itself over the whole of this cute—grasping everything; however great, and comprehending every matter the most minute, omitted the mention'of this part altogether. This was left to. his Learned , Friend, he (Mr. Brougham) keeping all the sap of the ease, -mid leaving him only the rind. Was it that this part was too hard for his work manship, and that be therefore left it to his Learned Friend?—. Thelact, however, was clear, from the evidence of Lieutenant flownatn, that Bergami slept in the tent ; and, in addition to this positive evidence, their Lordships had, which was stillbek ter, the negative evidence of the Countess of Oldi,--(Hear //rates several Peers).—Why, if the fact was not so, had she not been called? Was this, too, an accidental omission? Were the Coen eel for the Queen not agreed upon this point also? He would not pretend to say they were not, though be had his own sospi cicms on the matter. In such a case u the presto, he would have put the Countess of Oldi into the box at all baxarda; end, the moment he found that it was not intended to do so, he said the ease bad received its death-blow. If Bergami slept in the cabin, surely the Countess of Oldi must have known it, and she must have been the best witness on the subject? Why, then, had she not been called ? She had been sent for. Mr. Vizard , bad brought her to this country. She was now in this country, ami, no doubt, had been questioned. She was, of course, will ing enough to assist the case, but she would not consent to state on her oath that which was not true. But if there was any par ticular objection to calling her, there was a host of witnesses be sides. Where were Schiavini, Austin, Hieronimus, Marlette, Camera, and several others? All of these could have been pro duced to speak on this point, but they had not dared to examine one of them. Need he offer one word more to their Lordships on this part of the case ? But it had been asked, if Bergami had slept under the tent, what inference could be draws from it?-- The tent was liable to the access of several of the suite, and, on one occasion, Lieutenant Flynn went and lifted it up at the side to speak-to her Majesty. Now, against that point the evidence of Garguilo was conclusive, for e swore that it was fastened down all round, and that there were pins to fasten it. Mr. Hownam said it might be opened on the side, and Flynn said he lifted it up. Did he, however , ever attempt to lift it up, except when he was ailed by her Royal Highness? Oh, but there were hatches ! and persons might come u d p from below. Yes, but what said Lieutenant Hownam upon that subject? He stated, that one night he went up through the hatches, but finding the tent closed, he instantly withdrew ' • and yet it was maintained that the parties in the tent were liable to interruption: but who swore that the hatches were left open? That, at best, was a point in doubt; and yet, if they were so, the parties sever sup posed that any one, unbidden, e:ould dare intrude upon their privacy. Ile nosy begged to direct the attention of their Lord ships to another fact, of more importance than those upon which he had already touched. Garguilo swore, that on one occasion he saw her Royal Highness sitting in B ergami's lap, on a gun on deck ; and Paturzo swore it also, and that he saw her Royal Highness sitting with him (Bergami) on a bench, his arm sup porting her back. To this might be contrasted the negative evi dence of Lieutenants Hownam and Flynn; but there was ano. ther fact sworn to by Gargoilo and Paturzo, at which Count' Schiavini was said to have been present, and yct he was not called to contradict it. What was the natural inference to be drawn front this circumstanced' What would be inferred front it, in the investigation of truth in any Court of Justice, but that those witnesses were withheld from a fear of what they might be able to prove. Now, then, without adverting to the circumstances of the extraordinary rise of Bergatni, to the introduction of all his family, except his wife, into the suite of her Royal nigh ties', it resulted from the evidence, that a number Of these in decent familiarities had taken place on several occasions, and that afterwards her Royal Highness slept under a tent for six week;, side by side with this man. Was not the conclusion of guilt most evident'? What was the doctrine laid down by the C:onsistorial Advocate of the Queen as he was called? Ile had said, that if opportunities were shewn, and circumstances proved to lead to the conclusion that advantage had been taken of those opportunities, it was sufficient ro make out adultery. What better opportunity could have been afforded than in the tent? and facts of the most indecent familiarity were deposed to by the witnesses; thus applying the facts to the argument on the other side—to the argument of the great Consistorial Autho rity, it was clear that the House could arrive but at one condo sior. One very singular position had been taken on the other side—that the parties were never undressed ; nay, Mr. Brougham in one of his examinations, had asked whether the'Princess took off a stitch of her clothes (such was his word) during the whole of the long voyage? Yet the Princess had been lying all the time side by side with this "singular-looking, stunt-built" man; and, because her dress was not taken off, it was to be concluded that there had been no criminality. Was a proposition so mon strous ever urged before any tribunal, more especially before puch a tribunal as this? Paturzo bad sworn that he saw her -I,,oking out of the tent in a morning-gown, and it appeared that the dress of the other party was a loose Tunisian robe, and Dr. 1 1 Holland had deposed that it was the ordinary mode of dressing. If such obstructions as these were effectual, what was to be come of population ?—(Laughter).—Formerly it had been said, , that a Looped and whale-boned petticoat was insufficient. 4 ' Oft have we known that seven-fold fence to fail, Though stiff with hoops, and arm'd with ribs of whale." this too frequently " Gave way and bent beneath a fierce embrace." And was it credible that the ttueen's morning gown had made a stouter resistance? He (the Solicitor-General) hardly knew how to deal with the kind of justifications set up on the other aide : the tedious evidence might be resolved into two or three points, and one of the reasons (for some reason or other must be given) for the conduct of her Majesty during the voyage was the strongest ever assigned. It sbewed to what extremities the other side was driven when they resorted to excuses, ground by a very slight examination to dust, and dissipated in the air. Protection, they said, was necessary : the Queen must sleep in the tent with a male protector. Had they any reason to suspect the crew ? No. Would not a person lying in a hammock, within four or five feet of the tent, have been a sufficient pro tection? Yes, was again the answer of the witness. Was not Captain Flynn there? No; only occasionally; but be might' , have been there. Lieutenant Hownam might have been there: Schiavini might have been there; but then he was only a lands man: What was Bergami but a Landsman ?• True, but then ] he was " a singular-looking, stout-built" man, and might be of m re service to her Majesty—( Laughter).—But for the lan guage and the imagery on which these matters bad been ob served on the other side to mislead the judgment, everybody must have been struck with the extravagant absurdity of such pretences. The organs and faculties of men were, however, now getting into their proper state, and they began to see clearly, and to judge fairly. One observation made by the At torney-General carried irresistible weight. What must have been the mutual reflections of these parties in their situation ? Here was a serjeant of dragoons, a courier, an elevated menial, lying, for months together, side by side, with the Princess of Wales ! Was it possible that she should not have been struck by.the gross indecency of such conduct? Yet she was now to be held up as a woman of such extraordinary purity, of such noble, exalted, and re fi ned sentiments. If, for a moment, she had b een thoughtless and foolish enough to place herself in such a situation, must not reflection hive &hewn her in the most glaring colours, the impropriety of her conduct? A woman of - the most ordinary delicacy—a woman of no delicacy at all—a mere woman—must have been struck by it. What, then, was the conclusion ? Only this—that she could submit from but one motive, and that motive a determination to gratify her de sires—to feed and inflame her Insatiable passion. The moral evidence was even more cogent than the direct testimony, and no man who did not wilfully shut his eyes—he repeated it soberly, deliberately, dispassionately—no man who did not wil fully shut his eyes, could fail to see the obvious guilt of the accused. He defied any one with the soul of a man, and the faculties of a man, to give any other solution to the case. Fae tirra might mislead—yarty might sway—we might wilfully shut our eyes, because we did not wish to see a thing; but looking at the facts as we ought to do, fairly and coolly, it was impos ail* not to decide that an adulterous intercourse bad taken place between the Queen and Bergansi. Need he allude to what he lead mentioned when he before addressed the House—the ab iseuce:of that Individual, who, if the queen were innocent, if the facts admitted of explanation, might have been produced ! He had been a respectful, humble, obedient, dutiful servant, :d no more--discharging all his proper dudes for his august mistress, and no more—a man 'without. Newish, without hnpu eatiou—why had be not made his Rspotraince? . 'He had ap. wel ched this couutrp—be had =de* SP. Motes ill one of the .. . Primes* • ratios,. wa doubt bislang** lie - e a leula t ion I when his esrei•wn Were moot ..sed—this respestful, Itgathis,' Wsmy anti& .ttarned, , not daring to atcotimany his Rort mistress hind. His sister arrived—Vsessaffi the anentt, Inirlusd, _ clone not. The Counsel or the Queers, hat and eeldhlielbs assertion beyond all comparison, had exclaimed- 0 ' Oh, Or surdity !--among the numerous extravagant doctrines on is other side this is the first 'time a person charged with edgier, has been called upon to vindicate himself had his guilty pavane by his evidence !" The industry of the other side was only equalled by their confidence ; yet they affected not to hare discovered that pretedcat--that taunt precedent to which the Attorney-General had • referred, and which sheered that this was not the first thne such an' expectation had been indulged.— Mu evidence of Bergs-pi would be most important either :V Le niiAttrip and .betray the cause by his failure,' or 'he Jude a 'strong impression upon the House. arcumstanceolisk, perhaps, mighthe too strong to outweigh even his nonf's*. timony, but there was no good faith on the other Wo o if, , rtes. cskikiglariscence so boldly, they did not put this null mast to the, Bar. He would not Waste mere time by itpoit thjs pdini. A ward or two only regarding Aum " :77Z , numb itrengthen the evidence regarding the polacca, and for , this purpose only he touched upon it. Here Bergami and the Queen were alto under the tent. Here she bad no need of pro- tection, because in the outer taw were two of her servants, and *he idea, If necessary. as well as Bergami have slept in the *intent. He did not impute, even as a matter of inference, that idultery did take place on those two days at Aunt ; be only mentioned it to show the puiral system of cohabitation, al though the crime might there have been completed. He would endeavour to confute his remarks to a moderate compass, and would touch merely on those parts of the case that bad not been attached on the other side. As to the Theatre San Carlos it was not disputed that the Princess was it the masquerade there : she was accompanied by Bergatni in a domino, and by Louisa De Mont. They massed' the garden, went through a door at the extremity, got into a hired carriage, and so arrived at the Theatre. He laid no stress upon what ocuirred there ; his ob ject was entire! different. What was the fair inference from this vidt of the ' so secretly made, and so accampanied ? Did it not give most important confirm ation to all the other facts? Even the conduct of his Learned Friends in their ma. nagement—their zealous management—of the defence esta blished all that was necessary : Dr. Holland swore to tie fin. The charge had been made, and bad been in print for these six weeks : the attention of the Princess must have been drawn to the subject, and she must have known by whom she was ac companied to that masquerade. Did any of her English suite, or any of the Italian Nobility, attend her? If so, she could have proved it ; she had not proved it, and the evidence of 'De Moot on the point was rendered indubitable. Another circum. stance adverted to by the Attorney-General was the breakfast- I ing at Genoa and Milan; and supposing no reliance were to he I placed on the testimony of Majocchi and De Mont, still they vouched the presence of other persons, which must satisfy all as to their correctness, recollecting that those persons so vouched had not been produced. On F. 258, De Mout swore that Louis Bergami and Theodore Majocchi waited on the Princess and Bergand at breakfast, and Majocchi deposed that Louis Bergami or Camera assisted hint. Why, then, had not Louis Bergami or Camera been called to contradict Majocchi and De Mont ? If the other side did not dare to produce them, or either of them, according to all just reasoning it was strongly confirma tory of the original statement, and a clear evidence of guilt.— The transaction at Venice with the chain also deserved.* re ntarb or two. A cross-eianduation of great length had taken place, in order to enable the other side. if possible, to contradict Majocchi; it was found that the chain was bought of one Farina, his residence was described, and it was added, that at the time all the party were getting up from table. Fauna then might have been called ; some of the persons present and rising from dinner might have been called ; but they had none of them been produced. It had been said, that in the Public Papers there was an account with respect to the sale of this chain. He (the Solicitor-General) was satisfied that this publication would hare mo effect on the minds of their Lordships. The other side had produced Austrian Gazettes, and had offered supposed lethal( Baron Ompteda ; but, among all their ten thousand ittegallbil. ties, they had not ventured to produce this much-talked-04m. tificate respecting the sale of the chain. He did not believe it existed, or his Learned Friends would not fall to have brought it forward. The facts could not have been forgottea : Bergami had been waiting behind the chair of the Princess, she pat duel chain round his neck, he returned it, and then they parted with a squeeze of the hand. Not one point of this evidence had beat contradicted. What answer had been given to the facts sworn to at Bellinzona, Lugano. and the Devil's-bridge? At Benin zona, Dergami, in his courier's dress, was admitted on a footing , of perfect equality to the dining-table of the Princess, and the same occurred at Lugano, and at the 'Deill's-bridge. r. Den man had endeavoured to account for this circumstance, by re ferring to the smallness of the inn ; but &Morons was a large and populous town, and why was Bergami preferred to all the rest of the servants? Hieronimus was the Brunswick courier, from the same country as the Princess, and long in the service of her family ; but no such attention was paid to him, and it was exclusively bestowed upon Bergaml. Connecting all these facts together, the evidence was most importantly confirmed, and the conclusion was irresistible. But Lieutenant Hownam had said, that he had never observed anything in the conduct of the Princess towards Bergami 'in the slightest degree derogatory from her high station. Being asked whether be had never ob served this extraordinary conduct, and remonstrated against ir? he positively denied it; but, when the name of Captain Briggs was mentioned, he began to recover, and he then first could not recollect. This might, it had been said, be all consistent with veracity ; but if such expressions had ever passed Mr. Huwuam's lips, it seemed impossible that he should have forgotten them. W‘at, then, was to be thought of this Ofheex's general evident*? If such a conversation as that with Captain Briggs had taken place, suppose his evidence now given correct, it was at variance with the fact, or if not at variance with the fact, it proved what he then thought of the character and conduct of the Queen. That he had used those expreadons was established by a witness above all reproach ; in a former stage he was considered so by the other side, and he was embraced as an unimpeachable wit ness against the BilL But the moment he mentioned this con versation, the language and manner of the Counsel for the Queen underwent a total change ; then insinuations were thrown out t " Have you not lately dined with the King? Where did 'this conversation take place? and did you ever mention it to-any person before?' It happened that Captain Briggs bad men tioned it before; and, as to the charge of dining with the King at Portsmouth, It appears that Captain Briggs, commandiug the guard-ship there, in common with all the other Officers, paid his respects to his Majesty. Such were the attempts made on the other side to attack the veracity of a witness who did not state exactly what made for their purpose. He (the Solicitor-Gear ral) felt the utmost reluctance in pressing these matters upon the House, and nothing but an imperious sense of duty could com pel him to trouble their Lordships further. It was now near the hour of adjournment, and though he was anxious to confine his remarks to as small a compass as possible, he was still afraid that he must make a considerabk demand on the indulgence of their Lordships. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, as it was now nearly four o'clock, and the SOLICITOZ-GINIMAL appeared to labour under indisposition, be would move that their Lordships adjourn until Monday. Earl GREY hoped that the second reading of the Bill would not be pressed on Hoods , V the Solicitor-General concluded his address. It was that their Lordships should have some time to look at minutes, and therefore that on'Monday they would adjourn to Tharsdiy. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, as be had very impor tant duties to fill b another place, he should feel happy chat the House did, on its rising on Monday, adjourn to Thursday. Mr. Bsoucnam wished to call the attention of their Lord ships to a groundleu charge made against him by the Solicitor- , General, who bad iosinuated that be (Air. Brougham) had trifled with their Loitiships in not producing the letters of Ompteda which he bad in his possession before. " Now (said the Learned. Counsel) I did not possess these letters, nor had any knowledge of their existence, until yesterday morning at half-pastilevat o'clock; and 'they only arrived in town at half past eleTen sat Thursday night. I trust my present statement will be taken to be true, for such b orthattt e sv , vho believe otherwise will state their grounds The Soucuost-Gutanat. denied all personal allusion to Mr. Brougham, whose statement he implicitly believed. Adjourned at Four o'Clock. Coax Excitaxos,lasa-aasi; OCT. 30.—The supply of Wheat is 'whir large from Essex and Kent, and a moderattoupply from Suffolk, but geierilly inferior • picked samples, were 2s. higher than last Mood Fine Bari cy role. tog.. per quarter higher. In 4ef articles no ybpatioa. • •• • • . MONDAY, OCTOBER SO, 1840. TEI MM. !WM A, STOCIII SAT AT OXS O . GLOC . IC 1, Bank &ork 1114--5 per Cent. &demi 171 per Cui. Ceei. 67;15-67}-4 per Cent. SS*, *. 5 per Cent. Navy 1114* . *i }—Lend Annuities 17 7.11 India Bends 55e. 961. pre.—ilnebequer Bilis se. ls..pn.. • aninium 11* die.-.-Cosslar Amami 6$ el 17*. 7. Lanything 'bort of a Dims lamp" viadloatioa of iaaocenc* hats given Wotan toads have squirted all their [MOM at her MA/2111% and many of the on-lookers "Pecting on ' litthe . the e hand of li P e A C :4 that f . sheig .s shou . the ♦iper td has! swellen or fallen down dead suddenly," some of then begin to show that they have.. changed their minds: Our Readers know that his Royal Highness Prince Lsoroza pidd his respects to the Qtramen Friday.. Yesterday. the Duke of Stissea *Ent also to liras.. denburgh House ; Lord and Lady Fi2ZWILi2, I IIS.+ the most respectable of the old Nobility have wise paid their respects to her Blaustr• said that the young Lady JIRSZT, the daughta . 0/ Lord WISTMOIRELAND, is also going over; and it is understood that even Lady CasxurszArat has de► dared for re enemy! should the grey mare prove the Univ. horse on this occasion, what may wi not eat *expect ? TWBtSTY-FOURTH DAY OF THE DEFNeII. HOUSE OF LORDS. 'no Howie nu* this month% at the usual hour, Purr& wan nod bi the Bishop of limsrot, and the List mad as undo • Counsel werecalied in at 2S minutes past ten o'clock. Lord BALCARRAS addressed the House from the Gallery, bet is so low a tone of 'Mice that - he was nearly inaudible. Sis far as we mold understand, he rose to correct a mistatement in the speech of Dr. Loshingtoo, respecting she violation of con fidence that bad been imputed to Colonel Lindsay, in supposing he had given up some letters addressed to him by his wife, Lady Charlotte Lindsay, respecting the Princess of Wales. The Noble Lord said be had seen the whole of this correspondence, and be declared, upon his honour, that there was not ace word In thele letters relating to this unhappy subject. His Lordship then went Into a history of Colonel Lindsay's life and services. The Earl of LAUDERDALE was certain that whatever the Learned Doctor bad said could not be considered Amami% on Colonel or Lady Charlotte Lindsay ; and that nesidnewas more remote from the intention air cle Lootopit Cloisimout than to reflect en any one. Dr. Loannurrotn—. l4 My Lord% if, the norm of my a 4. dress to your Lordships, anytidus escaped me which might be . supposed to reflect on any indivitd, no one would feelit more , acutely than myself. Rut the oihole beroriginated in a mina. demanding, and as some as I learned this from Lady Charlotte Lindsay, I made the necessary cola:anon, and have had she pleasure of learning that she was saddled with it. If there is "any other individual who considers himaelf hurt by my observe.- dons, I have only to express my sincere regret, and I hope this will be deemed sundae" The LORD CHANCELLOR—Pt shall not detain you; . ----- • 4lible. Coed. 4 Royal ' arms; . —7 IW EVENDIG STARE .. :Won . ibe the on tattle- -' - T . imetva igitre.l3"l"n : se b o s en 4: 'I . r, - - , _ -..--- Lo - 40 - N - ..''-• • . -'. ri ,. .: .... slic igr r e l ttshihal result! r t P o l I if A confident int .......t_at i. .1.. THE QUEEN. To attempt to analyse nonsense woull be worse than tiresome. If our Readers themselves have set been able to read the speeches of the Arroftwzr the Souctron-Qawaaa+ with inylciud of patinae owing to the gross aksurdities which they hive en. deavonred to palm upon the House of Lords and the Public as the soundest inductions, and as exhibiting nothing bat the pure dictates of truth:—if, we sar, they themselves cannot, with any patience, hear ,such an abuse of all reason, they will not surely ex pect that we should waste our time,. and also theirs, in a long examination of absurdities, which expose themselves. •, The speech of the Arroantr-Ganiam. resolves itself into this gross assumption- 66 Though you prove every one of my witnesses to have stated a number of the grossest falsehoods, their credibility is not, on that account, to be considered as shaken, un less you hive also the good fortune to prove every one of the circumstances stated by each witness to be false"—that is, you may prove a witness to be un wor#:y of credit, but unless you tan (which is impos sible) suet with •counter -evidence every falsehood which they may have uttered, you are bound to be lieve that these falsehoods are true. Let us give an ex ample. Cuchi swore positively that the Quest, re mined six days at Trieste, hut it is on proof that the remained there only one day : or, in other words, by the evidence, Cuchi is proved to be a perjured wit- Ile% and yet the ATT021417-GINZRAL bas the mo dest assurance to argue thus s " But the evidence of Cuchi, as to the situation of the rooms at Trieste, was not attempted to be disputed," and therefore, for sooth, we must believe C.aschit Must we, indeed? The Learned Gentleman knows himself, that were rdwdairs but for a toeingut to express my Armon, that he rind the House willing to believe this, yet it is not a n d at "'"f d iad aral L inda b r she t s ids ya anns 2 orpossmaa_ respecting other pen°n, tut in their power. Disprove any assertion of such a whet wee ' hie l etT to submit to yatrr 7 Lor dships. witness, witness, after proving him a liar I Who but an idiot Th e s ouotoost , thootetomod,„,“ My Lords, f t , pot , would Waste time in such an attempt? manor of dui muse which I adopted on Saturday, el esmotioing In the same manner with regard to Barbara Kress. the evidence in ITO* orders I now cane to that Pot of . ft That witness was proved by Count VASSAL', Lieute- r e " caltansd:ll..Leces=of at Rai" In the WhisnW°. nant HOWMAK, and others, to have stated the grossest noir sir so sawn ae lmss toosomo rortioutoroteentcam' facpw ion. pitosiiss seta falsehoods; falsehoods; and if . the Baran d'Esna had not been the s i ngu l a r wr igh go th e terrace, sag hits. caste, most woo. prepared to confirm their statements, he would have be t utnenarrance. lie gar he sip , the Princess andßergaTi been allowed by the Hanoverian agency of Carl:rube,. in esi die terrace, buo he did not.observe thou touch oath athar. and their creature, Beasraer, to comoto this country. PolusPreilluts oti Mt. Craven's =bid was, thattllerotras 0,0•1 Who; therefore;would believe another word which. alga g "guisr snikine . 4gSsilSrs sheis is Ms sesasslisslass • to .4r Royal Ilighoas most earaordinarz. Could to heat this wretched creature said, except when she was con- made eachit tattoo etategio the remotest /At set firmed by unimpeachable witnesses? 0! but "no at- suppose that, instead of Bergami, her Royal Highassa bad been temp: has been made to contradict her as to the - dispo- attended by Idiefonimus or Steed, would Mr. Came boss sition of the rooms."—Beacrames bed-room was "masons" with her Royal HillhOofot ? ho, evrtalair est. No. 12, which communicated with No. 11, and that or tr be fo re knew, hich induced his mind, i t il esigu as to wlini i l ls Shea taw,. with again with No. 10, her Royal Highness's bedroom. her Royal Highness. It had been stated, that helms over. Would any Advocate, but one reduced to the last looked the tame , b ut whet, he osulg elk , does this prove? i shift, reason in this way ? but, in fact, fhe meant Nothing hut that in this, as in lamest all shags, occasions, there to speak.at all, he had no choice left when trying to was a mixture at caution and imprudence. It Is impossible to bolster np the testimony of such Wretched instru- kh7dlcsileusptir. cion Craven's conduct, : a y 7tthsen the gil.an;!ttlalßeht.lS raents of a conspiracy, foul and detestable as ever genii might he copstrued most unfavourably. Lord Liandsg was hatched against innocence. In answer to the *1:1711,11,11$ his ev en id g c a t sh h a e s he did ilee reeotlects isereeevgLir by his of bK nartable Learned Gentlemen, who,se obstreperous eloquence figure. The next question put to his Lordship is worthy of notkei has tos pid ir y , o;: y becom hen you e acquainted with considered his fi th gu e re nam as e r of arka ßar e been so vehement about the Qintex lby ask performing the part of an automaton—a part which they and never asked his name-•-be was pointed out to me. This was their friends wish she had always performed—we painted the out t a c l : l l7l: r LO S. the p hi. bai tha ri t h e w h as et e l o e ii h si y was ered b l 3; the hots . household would ask, if they never heard or read of his late as an object of peculiar interest or curiosity? The fact speaks excellent MAJESTY enacting a part in a profane stage r d or i . ts f e t t. from No other arrant was th minuteec u s s o r t r i t s ed out to Lord dascription,and fr Lhn - play, at Leicester House? the knowledge of mankind, that we deduce facts with more accts. At to the sudden elevation of Beactaart, we think racy and precision than front circumstances which appear more prominent. Lady C. Lindsay was called to speak to the conduct of it has been at least equalled by that of Mills ' the her Royal Hi g hness at Naples, although she only joined her hair-dresser, whom a certain Prince of Wales made t ria u la i tt l eC twelve de some g h t f le ovl r e /I e quitted etemstances oc thet eur. eitT. In When one of his Pages, an event which at the time raised the Princess and Lady Charlotte Lindsay walk out Bergami a terrible rumpus among the young Gentlemen who a l at w a ta il l e u . si oo lt them .het tb L ! ‘ s it e c . n o :bli c l i ts sr e privete Bergaai :nße tie vels atwlltli Cou were then Pages. 'seer; the Prime's luaas him the bottle out of the carriage, he puts it to his mouth and drinks, and then she receives it fart him again. On one other' of the Learned Counsel's declama tions.we must say a Word or two.-or, rather, we shall ydr. DiSMUN called upon th e L ear n e d C oun s e l to R od the bring forward another person to say a little, but that "li ens* The this G subjees - s. did so. Upon being asked whether little most conclusive: we allude to his statement and the bottle was returned to th e c ar ria ge , L a dy Charlotte Lindsay inferences respecting a gold chain " bought from subject." tipdol" chaff 11 :- r ec°11 essed ;ettirwasherplATteht."Psattilbeg Andrea Fanna, and conferred on Bergami by the .. r ; r t i; th oug h t be refo being rmed t he b ott l e to t h e g r - 71 1 6.0 , she QUlltd." Now, it so happens that this Andrea Fanna, w aira h s at C°: i peUe c tt° say s t r a ch ra uutlS ns c i ost F d nun such an an*: ioa though he could not attend the Trial to give evidence, pose that the fact w tld sp otherwise than her Ladyship &mkt ? has sent the following Certificate: and was not that fact a proof of an extraordiaary temoeste*? Her Ladyship afterwards quitted the service of her Royal Venire,dept9l9 inn' Highness, and-was asked whetha the had not declared that her k I; the undersigned, certify, that I did not sell to her Royal departum had been a great relief to her mind? This she was Highness the-Princess of Wales any sort of chain, at the time of unable to deny. She was unable to deny, too, that the &tam. her stay here in Venice. In assurance whereof I sign my name, te st r o ce th f e f e the er , poresale pae ecessary stopsflth:oindj:rns reports admitod sbl4 that h e e d il b it er eet ta (Signed) " "PR" "MIA: * been for the obligation upon her to assist same particular Judi . Nothing is more surprising in these proceedings, vid.ual, she would have left the service before that perfect. a than that in a conspiracy like the present, having The Souciros-Gemmax then read that part of the evidence widely extended ramifications throughout almost of Lady Charlotte Lindsay, which stated, that she thought it every quarter of Europe, and carried on . by English ee ry j ut s did she ot might have at what aade the si e se might ha adon sessdal d and Hanoverian Agents, playing into the hands of it, or that she had said it at ails This, the Learned Counsel each other, and linked to each other in such a way ;VAT:: o t r be th t e eaSimaa chara ct l er aafadthe co only cf her Royal Lad y called to spak as, with the assistance of technical rides of evidence, and it would be for their Lordships to sayhow far servicetb4 to render complete detection almost impossible, the that teatita :l had hem in been made , support servatlssNienptying QUIZ* has been enabled to disprove so many of the bad `sewn a disposition to induce circumstances stated by the numerous witnesses ar- made sa c reds esw e fi as weft as to e.ltwaswell thehimself, this the occasion with rayed against her, and so effectually to prowe lo tt I Is Atactedt t h e p ors orney perjury of .the witnesses for the render ; every other particle of their evidence hum. I si; Wilmot ,Geil and . Craven . . . 4 a r 4 la si a d M fn ha in it; lag call cia: r: s ii ac ti tab Ina 11111.1 ton In bis Blii 1 low Intl ado the robe *so MA. trot, Hai !MC Lor and Eat ibex on 'pro , atte rani thei Sati kA bea phi] siam end Wird LI.A. titic ri of the'___ *oat ab- S At thatike Maths General Ime s m this witness to vitiate the 1411. well known to those sire hadi welf, that his Learned Mid titiC the most honourable forbear- eita were deeply Indebted to him liel l exercise of that forkaranee. had also spates la tam Cl Ph 7 0 I I a I 1 C Z