Star. — London, England, 1829-05-08 00:00:00

. slating she Adana. gradual Ale- TH,Eici. M.A. , after Wail blip to Write ebotkod la asir swallow op every kind dant any limit to tztended: A. long as a comptdearr pike relief send isee. the poor will be indifferent ao esenien,hens a wawa soilldeat stkoolos to acquiring any pro pen, of their own ; for they may truly my, what do we want of property? we want nothing bat daily work, and if we cannot ob tain this. our parish is compelled to support us. Now. this suede of reasoning. which is inibappUy legalised by the present imam • time, tends to andennibe ove of the dearest ties by which the lower are united to the higher mesa society. Whereas, on the cow, teary. in those few implicitly'. I,lsick a love of independent petty is observed in the pier,leheeser, the wholesome balance of 'mutual attachment is emhlseihlFd. As moo as by gradual savings I.e is enabled to rent far penhase a rood of land. his is a etwessen interest with even his wealthiest neighbour.and he scorns, is smock as that seen would, asp alai more than as interchange of Meeks, and protection—that commas hoed of human mature." Again. a little farther in the same chapter, he nb. serves. with much sound reasowing— " Ike, that by *motet sayings is enabled to weary a seat cot tage. whether le be die owner tie the tenant. Madden himself of sothe Importance la the village or dab of which be is a member. He will be looked up to as as asimple, and if he Mule mama'. Tied till be arrive at that degree of ladependsmes, his is the very • sample, the imitation of ( which is loutoded to be eaforced in this dissertation, as tbe calf bee for ofectually hoprevieg the coadiden. of the labouring clause of society." In his chapter on education, be has displayed consi derable judgment in his selectiun of a plan of universal education, and to which se particularly refer our readers. After speaking of the Irish peasantry, at the conclusion of this chapter, he says— " It ma* be gest* to any coosiderat; person. that a people, enjoying the blessings of education, will. Individually. be more re spectable, and would, conseleently, be seldom found tumultuously rising against the lawful Government. They would generally be dimmed to respect their lawful superiors. sod.conseleently.woold naturally aspect to obtain their ponies of respect from those lope rises in return. which mot invariably happen where universal education is sedulously extended among all classes of the commu nity. In cases of sudden attacks tso the part of an many. an In tim:tea people wiU always be more tractable than an usgovertlable licentious rabble : they will be ever ready to form favourable opi nions on the actual state of affairs, and be ready to act accordingly. Therefore. if the intetferetsce of the Government is necessary for the establl.bment of proper schools, for the formation of a popula tion sa highly eakulated to answer every purpose. it stay reasona bly be asked. wily should there be any longer delay in conuosocing *Leh an impeetaot oodertaking r Our limits will not permit us to notice this able pam phlet so fully as we could wish. Mr. Haworth's plan for the abolition of the Poor Laws, Ise cannot omit— . t. That slaw shoild be enacted, which would exclude from pariah relief, after the mikados of fee years fra.the date of its enactment, all persons • who bad sever applierfer, and received parish relief, befogs the eapiradea of that period. " That a law should be matted, which would eaclode from parish relief, or admittance into any work-house. peer house, or any parish receptacle for children, after the mg:trades of senvears from the date of its enactment, all chtidrecosera. lowingiettleosests in parishes whose population exceeds ter ihmensiflobabitants. " 5. That a law should be enacted, which would eadode from parish relief, or admittance into any work-house, poor-Neese, or any parish recept foe .ehikken. after the expiration of efgka yeararom the d arterke cosmos**. all children born: having set those:its in parishes, whose population does net eaceedifirsakeetutent lubabitants, bet isnot less than shear aksissosid inhabitants. " 4. That a law should be enacted, which would *Wade frees parish relief, or admittance Into any wark-house. peer-house. or soy palish receptacle for children. after the expiration of sewn years !teen the date of its enactment: all children born. having set tlements in parishes, whose populations does not exceed tam shoe rand inhabitants, bet is not lees than ow thossand inhabitants. " S. That a law should be enacted, which would exclude frost pariah relief, or admittance into any work-house. - poor-house sr any parish receptacle for children. after the expiration of poor-hone, years front the 4pte of its enactment. all children born. having set tlements in patWies, whose population does not exceed ene Shop rand inhabitants, but is not less tbanftmAinsdeed inhabitants. " S. That a law should be enected, which would exclude (rem parish relief, or admittance into any week.house, poor-house or any parish receptacle for children, aftee the a:Oradea of dam years from the date of its enactment children born. boring sop dements in parishes. whose populatio; does not exceed dise Asuedra inhabitants." --------- Wsgb the following passage, assuming the conse quences of the abolition of the present laws to the farmer, we must conclude our remarks at present— . 4 we, may fairly voltam this asserdoe, that a great proportion of those idle youths, who, during the centlunanse of parish relief, would avaU themselves of the claim they possessed of obtaining assistance, world, at the abolition et the pour laws, actually become useful servants in the (amass of the rids, who fregeently employ more people of this desseiptlas than le abialutely requisite; at any rate, the very idle and mast Indelem steer young paupers would, U properly taught, make excellent streams #n the .sesame et the Nobility and Gentry, where the employment they Nasally gm is not si ne exercise f or 011 P greatest part of them. And slue fashion and the flips* et polite society have made it abseletely necessary tf keep a number et fellows fee the sake of dleismden and show, Is It mot better that this useful class of people should be obetined•trons the country, and regniarly instructed in the arts of fashion •and dress, thin be auffessed to burden the agricultural inte rest with.their abominable idleness?" • • LAW INTELLIGENCE: COURT OF KMOI BENCH. Weavaurstas, NAT 7. &Maas is Mum. THLIITIM IP. LIATIWIN This was so sedan on a policy of insurance, tried at thi last 'Wags in London before-Lord Tenrerden, when a retail" WAS found for the plaintiff, with leave to move to have itOt. aside, and a nonsuit entered. The eircum stance, under which this leave was given were these— Ai the trial.. John. M'Allam, the broker who effected'• thasititurance, was called by the plaintiff as a witness, but tam - called upon to produce the policy. pursuant to hii subparts, he refuse() to do so, on the ground that he had a lien upon it. Lord-Tenterden represented to him that the only way to give value on the policy was to produce it, and that. he would have the same lien uppn the funds the plaintiff might recover as he bad upon the policy, and that there could be no doubt the Court would, upon his allegation, impound the fonds that might arise from the verdict of the Jury till his claim vyas satisfied. The witness, however, still re fused to produce the policy. His Lordship-then told him that he would be • liable to punishment for a con tempt of Court if he did not produce it, and aglin ie presented.to him that that course would be much m' re advantageous than keeping the policy to himself. The vitae's*, after consulting with Mr. Alderson, who had bee., retained to advise him, produced. the poison. Mr. Pollock. far the defendant, then objected to his evistnie being received, as he wasan interested' witness. Lord Tenterdeni however. overruled this objection. and the , trial proceeded, finally being decided in treifitar of thr . Mr. Pos.t.ocu now moved the'onrt to have the err. dict set aside. and a non-suit elites td. on the ground:, first' that the witems! !sight OM to have been compelled to produce the lx•licys aid *it s - tecoildly. be was interested -i* the plaiktiff *fining his cause, and that therefore, his testimony ought to have been rejected. The Learned Counsel 'quoted a dictums if Lord Eldon's, in Jacohis jteports.ths. a easeof Lot d O. WOillliestON in which a solicitor was authorised oldest ro prodtite certain docuroests oat which Itt r lntdt ineutsportet his tipsiest.. . 'file rho? tlhesight thawass atwidedistinedrue be: moire*** ease of - a *elicit* sed*-broker.. Bruit. i,l (4 1 / 1 1 retiieed. paticies as Hen tor their ;horses, busi if they were slowed to withhold them on a trial it might lead to great Hooke, as they might be induced to fiend themselves for the purposes of the underwriters. .th the first ground, therefore, the rule could not be granted ; but as the seestion of whether the evidence of the broker ought to hive been rejected as that or an interested person was worthy of further consideration. the role tpight be had on the second ground. _ Rule Nan granted. LOlll DALHOVSIIt V. CHAPMAN. This was an action to recover 8,001. being money bad apd received by the defendant for the plainti ff 's' a.e. The cause was tried a few days back at this place. when the plaintiff was nonsuited. The defendant was a pettier an the house of llerries. larquhar, and Co. and bad received an assignment from a Mr. Gordon, who was the plaintiff's agent, and who acted under a poem of attorney given by him. of the off-reckoning or clothing allowance of the 26a) regiment of foot, to which the plaintiff was entitled as Colonel of that re. , ginseNt. Oat of this clothing allowance the clothing for the regiment ought to have been ;slid. but Mr. Got don having assigned it to the defendant, the letter received it foe thief years. The clothing was in the mean time ordered by Mr. Gordon, but was never paid for by him. Tice clothing allowance received by the defendant was appropt iated by him to the settle ment of an account Mr. Gordon bad with the banking house. Mr. Gordon afterwards became a bankrupt. One of the witnesses for the plaintiff at the trial said, o cross.ezamination, that the party receiving from a .Colonel or his agent an assignment of the clothing al. lowance was by no means bou.ad to pay C.r the clothing. and that the agent was answerable to the Colonel for the clothing allowance, as well as for, any surplus that might remain after the clothing had been paid for. Upon this the plaintiff was nonsueted. Mr. Gomm now moved for a rule to have the non suit set aside, on the ground that by the terms of the assignment the defendant, receiving the money as the clothing allowance, was bound to appropriate it to the discharge of the clothier's bill; and that, in fact. he was placed in precisely the same situation as Mr. Gordon himself. The COVRT refused' o grant the rule, on the ground that though the assignment if alone %Inlaid be strong, from its terms. in favour of the plaintiff. yet that the practice of army agents made the defendant not liable. ' : . • %• ,-. M;411111 4 11112 0tF,, ~. ~ ; *4'..-.... s , . - .. ATUBIE. A Pim se at tip lash Poor. shilhij it. itaiiiiifinsi :- ith a Plait for the 4 Ihirlori v airs. By B. HAWOIITI iii) ithievr4. ep los. la Iris introdoctoty chapter. the Author, *eft the circumstances which induced I thita the subject. says— • 3 voldeot that, If the Poor Latin be oat el ovororbilodog proveos, they will oweatually maul of property's fir ,it Io olitely korona% to deli which tido Appal elitist of charity pay pot be esti ... __... ....-22 • ..--......,......• &is .• eumamp moil SMITH •. KIENNICK. Sir' Y SCARLITT state) than this was an action for money lent, for money paid. and for money had and received to the plaintiff's use. The cause was tried at Guildhall, before Lord Tenterden, at the last sittings after Hilary Term, when a verdict was bound for •the defendant. He now moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial had, on the ground of misdirection on the part of his Lordship. The plaintiff was a y , ung woman akb whom the defendant. a Gentleman of fin tone. had occasionally lived at Manchester, previously to the death of hi, father. The defendant had agreed to allow the plaintiff M. a year, but that not being recoverable at law was not gone for. What the plaintiff sought ti' recover wasl 221. the defendant bad received on her account on the 24th December, 1824, of an attorney at Manchester, who paid it to him on his bringing a receipt from the plaintiff. There was no proof of his having• given the money to the plaintiff. A sum of 10s. for fish, and 21. 12s. for boots and shoes,.paid for the defendant by the plaintiff, was also gone for. It appeared by several knees of the defendant to the plaintiff that he had bor rowed money of her, which he promised to pay on cer tain daycar also her allowance. It was perhaps going for this borrowed money, of which he (SirJ.Scarlett) was unable to bring any definite proof, that caused the plain tiff's failure in succeeding in that part of her claim which was clear. His Lordship, after telling the Jury that the plaintiff could not sue for any part of her allowance, and that there was no proof of the amount of money lent, said, with regard both to that and the 221. received by the plaintiff, that the Jury might presume, from the intimacy of the parties, that the money had leen paid. This was the misdirection of which becomplained; and be must submit that the intimacy was rather a presuisp• tiun that the money had not been paid. and that, at any 'ant, the Jary should not have been directed to presume without any proof whatever that it had. Mr. Justice BAThir asked when the parties ceased living together ? Sir Jausaleamurre replied that the date of the last letter was 1826; but the correspondence might have been kept up by the plaintiff after that. Lord TILIITIODIX.-YOU will remember that it was part of the proof that the plaintiff had no visible means of getting her livelihood except from the allowance mad* by the defendant. Sir JAP4I.II SCAALITT admitted that there was no proof of what means of livelihood she had; but it was clearly proved the defendant bad received 221. for her. Lord Immense—Take a rule to show cause; per. haps it may lead to some amicable arrangement. Sir Jas. SCitaLITT said that his client was far from wishing to mss' the matter, if it amid be settled pri• vately.—Rule granted. LYONS V. GOLDING. Mr.TAuNtoa stated that this case *as tried at the last Reading assizes, betnre Mr. Jamie'. Park, under whose direction the plaintiff Mai nOnsuited. He now applied for a isle to show•cause why the nOnsitit should not be set aside, and a new tial hiJ, on the ground of 'misdi rection on the part of the Learned Judge." This was an action of trover.' The defendant was a constable of Reading. who, under a search warrant, entered the plaintiff's house and seized certain goods. The plaintiff demanded to have them restored to him, but his demand was refused. • It afterwards appeared that there was no ground to suppose that the plaintiff had improperrycome by them, and they were, - after a space of six weeks or two months bad elapsed;restored to him. In the meantime the plaintiff bad brought his action of mover, for the conversion during that period, going for nominal da mages; his object being to defend his eiartieter more than any thing else. On the pint Of the defendant it was shown that the plaintiff bad demanded a copy of the warrant, which was given him. Wen this the Learned Judge gave it as his opinion that the defendant was protected by the Maigistraie's warrant. and that ti.e case came precisely within the words of the 24th *Geo. H. cap. 44'. • He (Mi. Taunton) contended that the sta mite would apply it this was an action of trespass, but that the gilt of the action being the conversion of the goods in the interim, which the warrant did not autho rise. the deleridintkould erit Shelter - him:elf under th e warrant. In the case of lietcher v. Wilkins, in 6th East, it was laid down that the stato;e did ant extend to a case of replevin. Mr. Justice , HATLIM-aut is the refits) to deliver I back iliegoOds re ibis case neonversion? Mr:Tat:arson was about to proceed With his argil menti'but • • • The - Cowin decided, that they Could not grant the, rule prayed for. • seimay. ?Uri/AS eliFitellpW#.l. WWI, WiLLIM4 pmts. - dap arinklub ' I . 1: 1101basin' indictment tot' a cano44 lii . likraud 1 • the erediton wrilkomarjageV, by'resiedwlest rgo 41, and removals of hie goods. The threeirst -diietldents were fogad stalky. but all thfrAmt Wes~111•11 1 ne, the trial, which tent - place maim months back. • The defendants were now brought op 'Of jodiessent. Los., Tentacles read his notes of thy tad; aißdscrits in your of the defendants were pat in, and Counsel Wiwi head for and against ; but the Coat postponed its judgment till so ninermst. . - altilli It COVRT. Mow t. it This being the first sitting di the COist during the present Ina. a great man of common motions were disposed vf. _ _ - • /PLATS e. PLATS. ' This was a question as to the te.taimentary intentions of Thomas Platt. of Stamford-street. deceased, who died on the Sd of Fcbroary.lB29, leaving real windy to the value of about 30,0001.. and personal property to the amount of about 80,u00L The deceased left a widow and two sons and three daughters. and executed a formal will, dispos.ag of the whole of his teal and I personal property, and bearing date the 21st February. 1826. Two other papers of a testamentary character were also found after the death of the deceased; the' fiat appearing to be the memoranda of an intended will, and the other a draft of a new will, founded on I, the memoranda, and drawn op by the deceased's solici tor, pursuant to his directions. The present was an amicable suit, to obtain the opinion of the Court as to whether the draft will should be admitted to proof. Drs. Doason and ADDAMS contended that the draft will clearly contained the ultimate testamentary inten tions of the, deceased, and ought to be admitted to pros bate. By the will of February, 1826, the deceased gave legacies of 10.0001. to each of his daughters; but one of those daughters having married shortly after the execution of the will, and received a bond for 10,0001. as a marriage portion, the deceased became desirous to alter this will, so as to equalize the provision for his daughters. He had also found that, upon the sale of a property taken by the St. Kadtatise Docks Company. it had not produced as much as be had calculated it was worth, and he, therefore, determined to reduce some charitable legacies given under the will of 1826 to Christ's Hospital. and to the British and Foreign Bible Society. The draft of the new will was drawn up by Mr. Pearse, the deceased's solicitor, in August last, and remaine d in the deceased's possession until his death. Four days before that event he desired the d'art will to be brought to him, and observed; that be had previously read it over, and that it was all right; and he then ordered it to be restored to an iron safe, from which it bad been just taken at his desire. having been persuaded by some of the members of his family to postpone any further c' nsidetation of its contents until a future day. Under all the cis cuntstsoces it was submitted. that the draft will contained the UltilliSte testamentary intentions of the deceased. Dr. Luantuarou. at the other side, contended that the draft 1,111 could not be admitted to probate. and that it did not supersede the will of 1826. 11 was not disputed that it was the intention of the deceased to make some alteration in his will, but the fact appeared to be that he had never legally given effect to his intentions. The draft will was only a paper for deliberation, and there was no impediment to its being carried into execution if the deceased bad so desired. "When it was brought to him four days before his death. however, the deceased took no step towards executing, but merely declared that it was all right, and that Mr. Pease, his Solicitor, knew all about it. The Comte was clearly of opinioo that the . draft will j was only a deliberative paper, and that the deceased was not prevented from execudag it by the act of Gob, which was the grossed upon which the Court usually' gave validity to uoesecuted papers. The draft was not formally prepared for execution, and it was, therefore, impossible for the Court to presume that it bad received the final approbation of the deceased, or that be kneaded that it should operate as his last will. For siz months the paper bad remained io the deceased possession with• oat his having taken any step towards its esectuion, and it appeared that be abandoned the opportunity of ex.. ailing it during his illness, though. doubtle►s, be bad ample•means of executing it if he so desired. Under all those circumstances the Court condemned the un executed papers, and declared for the will of 1826. SUSSEX QUARTER SESSIONS. Charlotte Philp, wife of Robert Jrnies Philp, a re spectable tradesman residing at ISsighton, was indicted for assaulting and ill treating Mary Aisne Sae, a parish girl. wbo was in her service. Mr. Lona opened the case for the prosecution. Mary Anne Seffeexaminedi airs twelve years old, and was an inmate of the workhouse here, but went to Brighton as a servant to Mrs. Humphrey. after which I went into the service of Mts. Philp, on the 18th of No. 'ember; when I bad been with her a short time she belt me sith a rod, and kicked me, so that I bore die marks for some time; I left her oa the 13th of Feb. on ac. count of her ill usage; the Friday or Saturday before I left, she accused me of burning the hearth rug, which' I denied ; upon which she threatened to strip me naked, and deprive me of my dinner, when I confessed it through fear; alter dinner she ordt red mt to go into the kitchen and strip myself ; I took off my frock, and she took off the rest of my clothes, and ordered me to clear away the dinner things, which I did, and con tinued without any clothes on until in time, during which time the beat me with a rod ond a booth; beard Mr. Philp tell his wife to put my 'clothes on. which she did ; she came home very lament evening, and because I had not done the needle week. she bad given me to do, she pulled me down to the carpet by the hair of my .head, and gave me a black eye; I found -several lumps of hair on the Sow afterwards; Mrs. Philp made me stand all night by the side of the bed wherein she and Mr. Philp were sleeping, and said if I offered to sit down she would beat me with a rod. On another night. because I did not let her in as soon as she knocked at the door, I was ordered to stand against the drawers all night, and when I sat down on the car pet Mrs. Philp struck me on the head with a stick.— The fOll,OO I ran away was, because she threatened to strip me again. I left her at twelve o'clock at noon. • Cross-examined—When Mrs. Philp first ill used me it was less than a fortnight after I went there; never told me to pur on clean clothes ; my bedroom was next to the kitchen; my clean clothes sere in my bedroom, and I could have got at them whet I was in the kitchen by myself naked ; I know no person named Lucy Lux ford; never told her that I bad been out all night, nor that I sat upon a step in the King's-road; never sent to see a person at Mrs. Rose's; never knew Mrs. Rose, never dined at her house; Mr. Philp said I should not be touched, and I afterwards stood by the bed in which he slept all night ; never fell down4airs with a child in my arms. By. a, Pollieurate- , -When my mistress stripped me she took asay my shoes; I eauseto Lewes in a catt ; did riot 'king my clothe), with'resei it was about ball-paw [six 41chick shen'lSok,th,Lewts; the man with the.cart stopped 'to tilled boon at Fulmer. and t titer pLces. • Witnesses were examined in co. roboration, and In v .' wen called for the defendant, whose testimony wen t to Ira rite miamedoet on the pan of the prusecturix. The Cuetauentbm recapitolated the evidence with the greatest clearness and decision, in doing whi c h h e tnok occasion to commend the conduct hods of m ra. Marsh and the parish officers. The Joey, after a eery long deliberation, returned verdict sti Goa". • . The Learned CVAIIIIMAII paned seatenco upon 'ha defendant, observing that she had bee, &wad guilty, by a Jury of her country, after a long and patient in: vess i gat i cm, of a most aggravated offence. It therefore became the duty of the Court to pass a sentence that would operate as a warning to others, and a protection to children so situated. The sentence of the Court was, ibis she pay a fine cf 40L be imprisoned in Horahnin gaol for three calendar. months, sad at the uphill:ion to eater into secognismcm, two sureties in ZOL enek.t o keep the peace for two years, and refuels insgyna ne d until such fine be paid. and teen inane. eatetWieto. POLIC T4LLIG ENCE. 0111LPHALL Mews AtX. a add& aged sea, war yesterday *barged vd6 steeling s gaits the bee at tie. Whim Year, Altitrogateetre t y mar l efaan, the servant. missing the glass Inns that pen el* muster where the Osseo was standing drinking some m ere eAlled tie her master. sad the prime, taking alarm ma oat M 6, Muse. He wu seen evensitea, and being dialoged with stalk s the gime. be polled k free his puttee end gave k ep. • Being embed by the Alderman whet answer be world may m the (barge? be repNsd he wield set dewy it, bet be had hem drives e ie it by egusese distress. Mosby bees sat et employ ter sword weeks. His amaimsei sad spristame awakened a stress mare* in lie Weer. and the Alderman war sliest so remand him, that hie &armee akin be WOW km. when the 'Sow stated au i s was net in the extremity et disarms lbe bstl M his peeks; and sine a gin glass, isd three aim glasses. which bad we desist been stein hews ober peblitbeetes. He kid timed the owner el ewe et the glass% width had bees stoles lbs sew As& meow He died — Mr. iena. a lionised victualler, who ressembesed serving the rinser with a slam et porter, and Washed the glass mestissed by the Akin basing wrists H. mese es it. He said be lOW s glass er a pewter pm ahem may day. ' • Hr. Aldermas Apart mid, Om basin no desk the Wake was a amass dilet, be sbaddlemd Wm m aides the Ott dale, sad comodtted bias acevallogly. DIARY.I.I6.IIOSIII. • Dlr. Kam whose father is a basks to Palling% was dna with awanklog Admiral blekland. TV *knits, sated that the primmer same to his smidgen that isoittiqg sod persemod his widt 4 bill anssontiog to 10L Itia: far goods so py4ed polaris* sh leis. He (the Admiral) ape he had SS inatiwittsse of the debt o mei Mr. 5 71. Kane declared be wail ow Ism the hoots MI it was Admiral said be preilded himself with's stick, and agile the defrodest to lease the house; bet he dtdartil he would ow !Ibis Mil was paid. said tined a his.. at his saw Admiral's) with is esebtelle, bet which he warded et wish his stick. The dam dant was at has apelkd Min she home, and be *el rased a at imbue, by polling the belt, sad mu gives moo cosiody. Itri Kam, in his defame, repeated ilmerdse gamey was dose to his let ther, mod aSSIMOSS attempts bad hoes made to master k.—He was ordered to had hail. _ _ Mhowd 2%erner and Thome hourther weereharged with the MB daring highway robber/ Thep neewiter. • Groilistmitioined Davis, reside, in lierraeor• place. was proceediag hawse on Me prenknis Ovasing aims UM. harratreet, Liston grove, what he was hooded sod knocked dower by live fellows, of whoa two were the priaewers. The peg robbed hiss of a gold watch and spreaders. - a oweveign sod sena diver, after which tbey ran fit towards ilettisatteet. where the prises.; wets secured by Marie, a watekwan. The others wade thdr esespe. Mr. Davies prorefty was net bond apse the primes, who doled haviog been csoserwed In the reishety.•••They wore cosamitted be is QUEIN4CLUAIitt Faave.—Tere .an, tamed Grows and Moir. caul &shel l et Reet.euert, Betboal-green, were charged with fraud. 'Ds priseasrs, who hawk teals about the streets, calla at do median et Mrs. Wall, to Stallard row, thachirsaltamsatel and Sand to sell her seine cosh ter ens Wan per bushel. Mrs., WBO weed to perebese sioeseen beads and a halt at shot rim wiltk they meesered in their cart * and that eastreyeal them late Yrs. wars eviler. • Penn. named Mania., who was ep to the tricks of mids t observed them troaserieg the each; and Instead et petting that hoe the sock, he saw they threw diem ever the sides. He gave ledermadea of the eirceautases to Mrs. Walk and the seals wet smeared, sod produced only sews bushels. Tb. primers add In their detain that it was all a Waukee They were ceouskted fee the hand. SPORTING IN '1 ELLWENCF.. r NEMMARgHT FIRST SPRING SHLICTINO. Wriessawsor Hawn The races today do mot nil for say &militia% &a may pad ear bong die mast lasponasit, via. the Gold Cap, wild Joke de Ban woe by a bred oily. The fellow* also started, but wee an paced Mrs Hooldsweetlee loasbuislaa, 3 yrs, !et Sib. Lord Seasbempatis Leptis% ft yrs. 7.t 3115.• Doke of Illialmissod's Hiodostaa, i . yra, let Mb. Colonel Tares Cicely, I yrs, Lord Orsiseasses a Fag, l yn, Set Oaly two pheed—S to i as Letabssidias The bade; for the .11110 was Sto apt ArogVaa, who woe easy. The Underlay Stakes-4 to 4-oa Mole. Oa was nay. Fifty Sovereign &akas—s to I as Lady Ha* ; was veep Ose Hundred Sweeselpse Stakes-4 to lor Ifatoa, who urea dowdy. • Ole Huodrod &overdose Haadlear—Was batwing Jeoklas sad Marian l woe eleverly....oely these two started, to 1 apt Pains " 11 to 2 apt North Daum 10 to 1 apt itappolto 18 to 1 apt 2 / 1 2 ithaWlep 20 ti I opt Wigan& Is to 1 age &NM 30 to I apt Chins 11 to It apt Pubis s to I ate Vona I to I apt Grass Mande _ _ _ paniArs 14 to 1 lest Clod& is art Vat mo to l silt Seriph INTIM= The Newmarket Stakes of so sem nob —DAL Lord Vilsarneilies colt by I Doke of Portamd's Pale edt Whisker I Mr. Rogers's gambol Doke of Grammes Burnam Doke of Penland's Amble*/ ( Lord Rzetees rano Mr. Payee's Pas S.. Lad Sister's Ada esk Doke st Portand's Rabe is Mr. Betimes Seraph Masts Mr. &WS Rhoda nit Lord Oranoses Whorl Lord Aeoso's f Froderke F. Mr. OreaSe's Mehicam Mr. Pettish Ifissais Lord Cavendlsies Reyegmolle s Mr. Barmsues Dark AS the rest ban declared (akin Matcb-1100 son. k It—Doke .1 Grammes Remold 1 1 10 Lord Orford's Rallina Oa • Mauls-200 son. b ft—Mr. Oak% Mamba, Su Idb. Mr. Peale'. Ralik Roble set Match—SOO son. Mr. Thornhill's Maim Mt 7th. eve Ig h Robert's Locket Mater-200 nese! ft— Mr. Beobberenb's Leabsenwls ge• calved 73 sees. from Lead Soutbowypeo's Upson. NEWMARK!! NAM TIMISSMAT &MOM Sweepstakes of 10 son. sub, be It yr olds Tet, sad 3 yrs sst o.a T.Y.C. The Moser to be sold for 150 eon, Sie. Sir J. Shelley'. Derosrdo, Byrs Mr. Dales Melaka'. 3 yr. Several °then started, bet were net pined. Mat* 100 lovs—T.Y.C. Lord Eater's Father Loos Legs, 0.1 101 b Mr. Gravities Nana, lit fib Woo by a length. Match, 100 sees. Is ft—D.M. Lord Finny's Latneettian, Set Mb ... Mr. Weatketiefs Tokay. est 121 b .3 1 ..s :. J 0 d• • s 1 •.• $ • Wen by a keg& The King's Plead 100 p; 4 yrs, 11e1; i In, Ile lib •1 0 end aged, lest-11.C. Walker'. Speedos. 4 yn Lord Cavesdkies Rapid Mese, t yrs Won by ahead. The 100 guineas; for Fillies, Set 41h.—D.Ms Lord Cavendftles f by Godolphin ... Lord liseter's Green Mantle ... ... Mr. Payne's Pauline .. Lord Easters f by Phaetons Won by 1 .... _ NI. $ Lwow, t Printed mad Pobbabesi by Jaw bliase. obe.reoligilai r P •at the Seas Ureter, No 1, Piehits.place, Tempi, ba. INCINM .0..,. al C # I anal Olsau Wiwi Su. a Pink sad I Auld Tbe OSeei alai le ha *me - 61 - & VALI Fara Ott Alme a. A I About UMW from I at on II *kb I Hoes Of ate 4 . 4 . 11" riiit « Dir. Ja doe Co Also &oats Gorda To b they be King's St. &II *Mare x+ . 17 COAIII limas 01 16 A' A as swam sakes I west I etstely fine col and in Newels and = happy rmsitai weep 11111, . Eon, blo ; a she • C Makin assn. Purl 0s tog to 1 sun's ions, loam .fit Water Dread' Roar, 4 P.ndAI carradi Bad C Easel bora, los Ito Th. Oak ve sleets. with • 1 ti Hm ter To and H all reit and C Gross T 1 Proses *mod SPrills %wadi 'fin Tai Prow' glob. way's,