Star. — London, England, 1813-03-10 00:00:00

• . ~• e interference the °hi ofSee of R • One wve the ilihjict of jealousy to every State, and this was the only 'country where it was under no restrictions., Ills Loidship concluded by saying, he should give his cordial vote for the resolution, as leading towards an issue, which, if accomplished, would be tt . blessing to the people, and a — protection to the Empire.. Mr.CANNING strenuously supported the motion-. • Mr. PZEI.E, Sir C. BURREL, and Mr. DANKES opposed the aebolution.-- , On a division, there appeared, For the Resolution, 166--Against . it, 118.—Majority, 67. Acljliitned at Half-past Two to Thursday. THE EVENING STAR LONDON. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 1813. FAST-DAY.—liolilsy at the Stock Exchange. Two Gottenburgh Mails arrived this morning, but they bring no intelligence of a date more recent than that which was received by the mails of Monday.— : The length and importance of the debate on the Ca tholic Question; and of the documents respecting the Princess of WALES, compel us to be brief in our ex litraets. In the month of January, Berlin daily exhi. bited scenes of tumult and disorder ; the populace having repeatedly risen against the French, whom they occasionally succec ded in confining to their barracks. Count Rovropoutx, the brave and virtuous Cover ; tor of Moscow, has been appointed Minister of the Interior of 'Russia. The Ex-Prussian Minister STEIN, whose enmity to BONAPARTE recently called forth a furious Proclamation against him, has also been made a Russian Cabinet Minister. One of the above Mails is that which was sup posed to have been lost. THE PRINCESS OF WALES. At length the reserved document, to which so many significant allusions have been made, has been given to the public in a Morning Paper of this day, with the Editorial preface, which we have also thought it our duty to give verbatim. We shall only remark, in laying it before our Readers, that from what has already come to the knowledge of the pub , lie respecting the manner in which the investigation was conducted in 1806, and the Report of the Noble Coriimissioners, coupled with the complaint of her Royal Highness, that she had no opportunity af forded her of confronting the witnesses—the Message is precisely of that kind which might have been sup posed to have been transmitted to her Royal High ness on that occasion : " HIGHLY INTERESTING DOCUMENT. a Among the various documents which have been received by tie respecting the investigation of the conduct of her Royal High nese the Princess of WALES, is a copy of, the Message which was delivered to her Iron the KING, by the Lotto CHANCELLOR, (Lord ErAinc) at the close of that investigation ; and as we trust it wit tend to chew the propriety of no further public pro ceeding on the subject, and of acquiescing in the authority el his Royal Highness the Prince of WALES, to conduct the education et his Daughter in the manner in which he may deem most berefi ttial fsir the interests of the State, aided, when necessary, by the advice of his confidential Servants, we deem it our duty, how ever painful to our feelings, to lay it before the public."—Mor slag Post. ae This Message was rer.rumended on the 25th of January, 1807, by the following persons : The LORD CHANCELLOR. Lord Viscount Howtac. Loan PREbIDENT. Lord GRENY/LLE. Loan PRIVY SLAL. Lord ELLENBOROOGII. Earl aPINCER. Mr. Secretary WINDHAM. Earl of Monte. Mr. T. GRENVILLE. Lord HENRY Pc ITT. (COPY.) MESSAGE FROM THE KING. 44 TO HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS OF WALES. " The KING Laving referred to his confidential Servants the proceedings and papers relative to the written Declarations which bad been laid before his Majesty, respecting the conduct of the Princess of VsraLes, has beta apprized by them, that after the fullest consideration of the examinations taken on that subject, and of the observations and affidavits brought forward by the Princess's Legal Advisers, they agree in the opinions submitted to his Majesty is the original Report of the four Lords by whom hls Majesty directed that the matter should, lathe first instance, be inquired into; and that in the present stage of the business, upon a mature and deliberate view of this most important sub 4eet, in all its parts and bearing!, It is. their opinion; that the • facts of this case do not warrant their advising thut any further step should be taken in the business by his Majesty's Govern ment, or any. ether proceedings inarituted upon it,.exctpt such only as his Majesty's Law Servantsmay, on reference to them, think fit to recommei.d for the prosecution - or-Lady Douglas, on those parts of her deposition which• may appear to them to be justly liable thereto. " In this situadort his Majesty is advised, that it is no longer Necessary for him to decline receiving the Prime's into his Royal presence. " The King sees with great satiJaction the agreement of his Confiders:a:l Servants, in the decided opinion espres.cd by the four 1 aw Lords upon the Salm:hood of the acrusatians of preg zancy and delivery h 7 ought forward azainit the Princess by Lady Douglas. On the ~ t l:er maters produced in the teurse of the Inquiry, the King is advised, that ;mac of the facts or allegations stated in preliminary examinations, carried on in •tLe absence of the parties interested, are to be considered as legally or conclu sively established. But in those examinations, and evett in the answer drawn in the sante of the Princes% by her legal advisers' there have appeared circuniva.,tes of conduct on the part of the princess which his Majesty eosin never regard but with serious ow.: ern. . • " The elevated rank which the Prince:s holds in thin country. and the relat t,L, in ..vhich she.startas to Ms Majesty and The Royal Slimily, rrin.t c.ways des ply involve both the interests of the 1 , State, and the personal frelings• of Lis Majesty, in the propr i ety $ and correctness ui ....r COlidUC: ; and his Majesty, therefore, 4 emnot forbsar to express, in the ronMusion of the business, Ins desire and expectation, that such a conduct may in future be observed by the Princexs, as May fully justify • those- Marks of pats raalteLard which Lis Majesty always w ishes to slew to every pal i of the Stoyal family. . . . • “ its Mak:sty has directed that this Message should be trans 'tenltedAsx the I:tin:was of W?les by his Lord t.baticellor ; and that copies et the trutedisse which have takes Oise en this subject, should ako be communicated to his dearly-beloved Sou, the Prince of *ales.' The following is the Letter of her Royal Highness the Princess of ‘VALits to the tt - xo, which the Hon. COCHKA'. Jimssrota read as a part of his speech, end which he said he could prove, at the B.tr the House. to have been written by the late Mr. Police- VAL, in conjunction with Lord Ecnozi and Sir Tito- MRS PLostitt. We give it without a comment : " TO THE KING. " SlRE—lmpressed with the 'deepest sentiments of gratitude for the countenance and protection which I have hitherto nut formly received from your Majesty, I approach you with a heart undismayed, upon the occasion so awful and momentous to any eharacttr, my honour, acrd my happiness. I should indeed (un der charges such as have now been brought against me) prove myself undeserving of the continuance of that countenance and protection, and altogether unworthy of the high station which I hold in your Majesty's family, if I sought for any impartiality, for any Indulgence, for any thing more than what Is due to me in justice. My entire confidence in your Majesty's virtues assure me that I cannot meet with leap. " The situation which I have been so happy as to bold in your 'Majesty 't. good opinion and esteem, my station in your Maksty's august family, my life, my honour, and through mine, the honouf of your Majesty's family have been attacked. Sir John and Lady Douglas have attempted to support a direct and precise charge, by which they have dared to impute to me the enormous guilt ) of High . Treason l committed In the foul act of Adultery. In this I charge the extravagance of their malice has defeateditself. The Report. of the Lords Commissioners acting under your Majesty's: Warrant, has most fully cleared me of that charge. " But there remain imputations, strangely sanctioned and countenanced by that Report, on which I cannot remain silent without incurring the most fatal consequences to nay honour and character. For it states to your - Majesty, that " the circum stances detailed apinst me must be credited 1:11 they are decisively contradicted." To contradict with as much decision as the cons tradiction of an accused can convey; to eiiiose the injustice and malice of my enemies; to shew the utter impossibility of giving credit to their testimony ; and to vindicate my own innocence will be the objects, Sire, of this Letter. 48 In the course of my pursuing these objects, I shall have much to complain of, in the substanc of the ploceeding itself, and much In the manner of conducting it. " That any of the charges should ever have been entertained upon testimony so little worthy of belief, n hich betrayed in every sentence the malice in whit, it originated; that even ii they were entertained at all, your Majesty shoal have been advised to pass by the ordinary legal modes of inquiry into such high crimes. and to refer them to a Commission', open to all the objections which I shall have to state to such a mode of in quiry; that the Commissioners, after having negativedthe prin cipal charge of substantive crime, should have entertained con siderations of matter that amounted to go legal offence, and which were adduced, not as substantive charges in themselves , but as matters in support of the principal accusation; that through the pressure and weight of their official occupations, they did not-..perhaps could not—bestow that attention on the case, which, if given to it; must have enabled than to detect the villainy and falsehood of Isiy.secusers, arid their tdul conspiracy I against sue, and must have preserved' my character from Ois weighty imputation which the authority of the Commissioner* ,has for a time cast upi it—but above all, that they should upon this ex-partr examination, without hearing one word that I could urge, have reported to your Majesty an opinion on these mat to s, so prejudice' to my honour; and from which I can have no ' appeal to the laws of the country (because the charges consti tuting no legal offence, c..nnoi be made the ground of a judicial inquiry) ; these, and many other circumstances connected, with the length of the proceedings, which have cruelly aggravated to my feeling, the pain necesrily attendant upon this inquiry, I shall not be able t 6 refrain from stating and urging as matters of serious lamentation at least—lf stet di well gosinded complaint. . . • 44 In commenting upon any part of the circumstances which have occurred in the course of this inquiry, whatever observa tions I maj be compelled to make upon any of them, I trust I shall never forget what is due to officers in high station and em ployment under your Majesty. NO apology, therefore, can be required for any reserve in my expressions towards than: But if, in vindicating my innocence against the injtiatice• and make of my enemies, I should appear to your Majesty not td'express myself with aU the warmth and indignation which innocence so foully calumniated must feel, your Majesty will, I trust, not at tribute my forbearance to any insensibility to the grievous inju ries I have sustained, but will graciously be pleased to ascribe it to the restraint I have imposed upon myself, lest, in endeavour. ing to describe in just terms the motives, the conduct, the per. jury, and all the foul circumstances which characterize and estae the malice of my accusal, I might use language, which, ' though not unjustly applied to them, might be improper to be used by me to any body, or unfit to be employed by any body, ' humbly, respectfully, and dutifully addressing your Majeitys That a fit oppurtunity has occurred for laying open my heart to your Majesty, perhaps I shall hereafter have no 'reason. to bp ment ;• for more than two years, I had been informed, thatimon the presumption of some misconduct in mO, my behaviour bad been the subject of investigation, and 'my neighbours' servants had been examined cdecerning It; and for some time I had re: ceived mysterious and indistinct intimations, that some great mischief was 'meditated towards' me; and in all the drcumstances of my very peculiarsituatibn, it will not be thought strange, that I however conscious I *as that I hid no just cause for fear, I should yet feel lonatuheasittess 'on this account. With surprise, Certainly, (because the first tidings' were of a kind to excite cur prize,) tutwithout alarm, I received' the intelligence, that for some reason, a formal investigation of some paste of my conduce had been advised, and had taken place. " His Royal Highness the Duke of Kent, on the 7th of June, 180§, announced it to me. He announced to The, the Princess of Wales, the bear approach of two Attornies (one of them I since find the Solicitor employed by Sir John Douglas), claiming to enter my dwelling with a Warrant to take away one half of my Household, fur immediate examinatuso upon a charge against myself. Of the nature of drat charge i"stras then uninformed.— It now appears it was the charge of WO Treason, committed in the intimous crime it A y. Hie Royal Highness will, I ant sure, do me the presentjustic: l t to your Majesty, that I betrayed no fear—that I rnaniksteti, no symptoms of conscious get—that I•sou,:jrt no excuses to prefare or- to tutor my ser vants, for the examination which tiny were to undergo. The 'only request which I made to his Royal Highness N.A.., that be would have the goodnesa to remain with me till the servants were gone, that he might bear witness that I had no converse_ tion with them before they went. In truth, Sire, my anxieties under a knowledge that some serious mischief was planning against me, and while I was ignorant of its quality and extent, had been so great, that I could not but rejoice at an event which seemed to promise me an early opportunity of ascertaining what the malice of my enemies intended against me. 66 It has not been, indeed, se4thout impstknce the most pain- t • '• :. • fid, that I have passed the teemd which hat Once elapse 4 Whoa it was not only known to the world (for it was known to the world) that inquiry of the gravest nature bad been instituted into my conduct, I looked to the conclusion with all the ..ageniess that could belong to an absolute conviction that my innoceuce and my bouour, to the - disgrace and confusion of my accusers, would be established, and that the groundless malice and injustice of the whole charge would be manifested to the worhl, as widely as the calumny bad been circulated. I knew that the result of art ex parts inquiry, from its very nature, could not, unless it fully as serted my entire innocence, be in aoy degree juit ; and I had tauz'ht myself more firmly to believe, that it was utterly Itnpossl ble that any opinion which could in the smallest degree watt a prejudice to my honour and character, could even be expressed in any terms, by any persons in a Report upon a solemn formal Inquiry, and more e specially to your Majesty, velthost my bay _ big some notice and some opportunity of Wing heard ; and I was convinced, that if the proceeding allowed me, before an opinion was expressed, the ordinary means which accused persons have of vindicating their honour and their opinion, which could then be expressed, b: fully vindicated and effectually established. What then, Sire, must have been my astonishment and my dis may, when I saw, that notwithstanding the principal accusation was found to be utterly false, yet some of the witnesses to those charges which wen brought in support of the principal accua. done—witnesses whom any person interested to have protected •-siy character, would easily have ststwo, out of their own mouths. to be utterly unworthy of credit, and confederates jai joint coasri racy with Illy false accusers, are reported " to be free fruila aq suspicion of untavourable bias; their veracity, la the judippra Of the Commissioners not to be questioned ;" and their Infamous stories and iusinuatiuns against nee" to be such as deserve the niust serious consideration;' and as such to be creclitel " tiU de- cisively contradicted.? . . 41 i'he Inquiry, after I thus had notice of it, continued for above two months. I venture not to complain, as if it bad been unnecessarily protracted. *I he important duties and official avo cations of the Noble Lords appointed to carry it on, may natu rally account for and excuse some delay. But, however exalts; able it may have been, your Majesty will conceive the pain and anxiety which the interval of suspeuce has eccasiuned; and your I Majesty will not be su'rprise4 if I further represent, that I have fuend a great 'aggravation of my painful sufferings, in the delay which occurred in communicating the Report to me; for though it is dated on the isth of 'July, I did not receive ft till the llth ' ot August, notwithstanding ypui Majesty's gracious commands, it was nue unqueitiOnably to your Majesty, that the result of an Inquiry commanded by your Majesty, upon advice which bad been offend, touching-matters of the highest immirt, should be first and ;immediately einrimunicited itcyou. 'l'he respect and uonour due to the Prince of Wales', the ititer. et which he mast necessarily have taken in this inquiry, combinedsto make it in dispensably tit that the result should be fbithwhh also stated to his. Royal Ilighnina, '1 complain not' therefore that it was too carry communicated to any one; 1 complain only, and I corn plinn most seriously, (far I felt it most seriously), of the delay in .1m controunnatiOD to me. ••• ' .`". ' '• • * 4* Rumour has informed the world, that the Report bad been early communicated to your Majeily and to his Royal Highness, I did not receive the benefit intended for me by your Majesty's most gracibns command i till a month after the Report was signed. But the same rumour has represdn:ed me, to my infinite preju time, as in possession of the Report during that month; and the tualice of those who wished to stain my honour, has not failed to su,,,;est alt that malice could infer front its remaining in that pos session so long. ' May I be permitted to ray, that if the Report acquits We, my innocence entitles me to receive from those to whom your Majesty's commands had been given, an immediate notification ot the fact that it did acquit me: Sentence should not have kit to settle its any mind, much less upon your Ma jesty's, for a month before I could even begin to prepare for an mown*, which, when begun, could not speedily be concluded; and that if the Report could be represented 'as both acquitting and condemning me, the reasons which . suggested the propriety of an early communication in each of the former cases, combined to make it proper and necessary in the latter. ' - " And why all considerations of my feelings was then cruelly neglected—why I was kept upon the rack, during all this time s ignorant of the result of a charge which affected my honour and my lite—and why, especially in a case where such graver matters were ro continue to be credited to the prejudice of my honour. till - they were decidedly Contradicted, the means of knowing what it was, th.it I might at least endeavour to contradict, were withholden from rue a single unnecessary hour, I know not, and I will npt trust myself in the attempt to conjecture. • " Orr the llth of August, however, lat length received from the Lord Chancellor a packet, containing copies of the Warrant or Commission'•authori4ng the Inquiry, °Elbe Report, and Of the Examinations' - on which the Report was founded; and your Majesty may be Pritkitisly pleased to recollect, that on the ISt h Ileturned ila ygiattful'thauks to your Majesty fur having or dered these Papers to beeeht Me. Your Majesty will readily imagine, 'that,- upone subject of such importance, 1 could not venture to trust only to my!own advice, and those with whom I advised, suggested; that the Declaration or Charge, upon ethich the Inquire had proceeded; and which the Commission era refer to in their ffeyfort, and reptesetrl'lo be the essential foundation of the whole proceedings, 'did hot accompany the Eranilnation and the'Repcirr, and also that the Papers them- Selves were not authenticated. • : ! • • **- • , " I ventured, therefore, to address your Majesty upon the supposed defect in-the communication, and humbly requested that the Copies of the Papen which • I then returned, might, aftet being examined and ambeadcicated, be again transmitted to me, and that I might also be furnished with, the Copies of the written Declarations, so referred to in the Report, and my humble thanks are due for your Majesty's compliance with my request. .0n the 29th of Augest I received, in consequence, the attested Copies of those Declarations, and of a Narrative of his Royal Highness the Duke of Kent ; and a few days afterwards on the ad of September, the attested Copies of the Examinations which were taken before the Commissioners. : : .• • " By the copy of the Commission, a' warrant which I have received, under which the inquiry 143 been prosecuted, it ap pears to be au instrument under your Majesty's Sign-Manual. not countersigned, nut under any seal. It recites chit an abstract of certain within declarations, touching my conduct (without specifyin: by whom those declarations were made, or the nature of the matters touching which they had been ma de, or even by whom the abstract had-been prepared) had been laid before your Majesty, iuto the truth of which it perports to authorize the four Noble Peers, who are named in it, to inquire and examine upon oath such persons as they thibk fit, and report .te? your Majesty, the result of their examination. 0 By referring to the within Declaration, it appears that they contche al tgAtioas against att., amounting to the charge of High freason, and also other matters, which, if ui:derstood to be, as th.y seem to have been acted and reported upon by the Com missioners, not as evidei.ce coi.firmatory (as they are expressed to be in the title) of the principal charge, but as distinct and substantive subjects of examination, cannot, as I am advised, be represented as in law amounting to cr•snes—how rune. of the Declarations refrred to were collected, by whom, at wb -se soli citation, under what sanction, and before what persons, newis h rates, or others, they were made, does not appear. By the tile, oleed, which all the within Declarations, except Si: .1 .i.n and lady Douglas', bear, viz. "That they had Len taienf'or ens i n.rfrese i.l solfranin: Lady Dow:las:1 statement," it may he cellecte.t, tint they lead been by her, or at lease by Sir John 's prof urenteut, anti the concluding passage of one of them, 1 mean the sib declaratopo of Wiikata.Coke, attergthens this opinion, as it represent) lir • _ • - - • -- • . • tan tough., leoOfitpanied by tioiltitof,.llle.LWAtels W have gone doyen as far as Cheltenioun, for tte esarnination of two witnesses, whose declarations ate there stated. I am, have ever' at a loss so know at this moment, whom I ant to tons der, ur W hom I could fix upon, as my false accuser. From the cir cumstance last mentioned i it might be interred that Sir John Douglas, or oue of them, is the aerosol. but Lily Douglas is her Within decksation,• el far trout representing the into .ma- Coo which she then gives, as moving voluotare trom lierselt. ex pressly states that she gives it nods . the direct command of it s Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, and the Papers leave me wLhout information from whom any cornoosaientisou to the Prince originated, which induced him to give such cornea/took. " Upon the question, How far the advice is agreeable to ilaw, under which it was recommended to your Majesty, to issue this warrant or commission, not countersigned, nor tattler seal, and without any of your Majesty's attvisers, therefore, being nu the fair of it responsible for its issuing t • I am osa competent to de termine. And undoubtedly,'that the two bleb Legal Authori ties, (the Lord Chancellor and the Lard Clue( /Patter of the King'; dwell, consented to act Coder it, k is with GO greaiot doubt and diffidence that I can bring myself to rape se shy too picioti of its iltegaLty. But if it be (as lam gives to on:Ns - - stand it is) open to timothy, whether comistarty with has.' ' your Majesty should have been advised to coonntatni by •tui warrant sir commissitip pawns not to act in any --k-svwll ter, as Secretaries of State, as Pres., Cuousetiors, as Magpie's:to o:tterwise empowered, but to act as Commissioners, std under the sole authority of such warrants, to Mi./CM Whir"( any am thority, to hear and determine any thing upon the subject of those mini. its, into the known clime ni high treason, under the sanctiou id oaths to Is administered by •heat as such Commie* sinners, and to report the result theieot to your Mr.' sty. • say, there can be any question upon the L g iorty of a war rant or commission, the extreme hardship with which it has operated upon me, the extreme prejudice ethics it has do:-e to my elearaoter, and to which such a proceeding noes ever qt. pilse th • person who is the object of it, oblige me oil I am telly convinced of its legality, to forbear acknow:e.tgine its authority, and with all humility ani.deicreoce to your Majesty, to voted. against all proceed.h.gs under U. In addition to the above, and to the documents oa this subject which have appeared in our columns, we have others to subjoin, but it may be proper first to lay before our Readers a short narrative of s.•me re cent facts with which' they are already patly ac quainted :—The indisposition of the Piindess Cnsta. LOTTO commenced previous to the fete at Carlton. house, and afterwards increasing, her ROYAL HIGH NESS was necessarily obliged to 'defer her return to Windsor. In consequence of this, the Princess of WALES, on the Bth kebruary, addressed herself to Lord LivErtrooL, desiring that he would communi cate t 0 'the PRINCE REGENT her ROYAL HIOHNEhs'S in tention to visit the Princess CRARLorft, at Warwick. house, not anticipating the possibility' of a prevention on the part of the PRINCE REGENT, uuder the circum stance of the . Princess • CiIAULOTTe; COElsl4llleilt .•i . . from illness. - • Lord LIVERPOOL replied, that be was happy to an d nounce the Princess CHARVOTTE so moth better, that her Royal Highness would be able to visit the Prin. • cess of WALES at Kensington Palate on the following Thursday, tlth February. On that morning she re ceivid information that the Princess Cnit'nz.orrs was refused' coming' • • • Upon thisiUte Princess of WALE, again addressed Lord LivEr.rooi to knrw the reason, none'llaving been assigned, for :the Princess CHARLoTTL'S being thus suddenly prohibited from giving the meeting tw her oral Mother, and When and how soon her Roy 4 Highness might expect tome the RLvrr a. To this inquiry the Princess of WALE.; received d, following reply from Lord .I..lirsaroot. : • . . LETTER PROW LORD LIVERPOOL *To iseit` ROYAL mate • NESS THE PRINCIND OP WALES. • ' • • •- '• ' ' N Fiie Hiku.se, Feb. 14,1811. " Lord Llcepool has the honour to inform your P.oyal H gip nen, that in 'consequent, of the publication In' The Afseougt Cis:oxide of the 10th instant. of a letter addressed by yeneltuyal H:gitness to the Prince Regent, his Royal Highbesa thottght At e ly the advice V . his eolfulentiei Servals! s, to Dignity his corrananda, twit the initialed vivit of the Piinceie L'hal .ut cc to four Royal Highness on the tollowing day ohould not take plate. , " LOrd*Liverpocd Is not enabled to make any furthtr commit nkation to your Royal Bigness on. the subject of your Royal Highness's Note. , .• .• • • • To this Letter the Princess of WALtS commanded Lady ANN; HAMILTON. her Lidy in Waiting, to mi. ply is follows to Lord LIVERPOOL t " •' ' " Montague House, Blackheath, Psb. IS, 1513. " Lady Aane Hamilton L commanded by her Royal Illgh. ness the Princess of Wales to•represent to Lord Liverpool, mid the iniiidlous insinna lea respeetiug the publicatlon•of the Letter addressed by the Price:es of Wales ' on the 14:h of January, to the Prince Regent, conveyed in hisLordshsp's reply to her Royal Highness, is as void of foundation and as false as all the former accusations of • the traducer: of her Royal Highness's bottour is _ the year 1806. " Lady A. Hamilton Is further commanded to say, that dip nified silence would have been the line of conduct the Pine s would have preserved updn ssch insinuation (more that untie* coming Lord Liverpool), did not the effect arising from it operate to ct-prive her Royal Highness of the sole real happ near si►• eau possesf in this world—that of seem= her only ch.id. And the Confidential Servants of the Prince Regime ought to feel ashamed of their conduct towards the Princess in avowing to her Royal Highness their advice to the Prince Regent, that upon aurandlir rises/ and unfounded suppositions a Mother and Llaughtcr should be prevented from meeting—a prohibition positively against the law of name. Lady Anne Hamilton is commanded further to desire Lord Liverpool to lay this paper before the Prince Regent, that his Royal Highness may be aware into what error his Con fidential Servants are leading him, and will involve Um, bp counselling and signifying such commands." Here ended the correspondence. The Cabinet meetings and proceedings succeeded almost immediately ; but touching the nature, the form, and the object of those proceedings, the Princess of WALES being left to conjecture, her Royal High ness, on the 27th February, addressed the subjoined I letter to the Earl of HARROWSY COPY OF A LETTER ADDRESSED BY THE PRINCESS . OF WALES TO THE EARL OF 14ARROWEY. " February ST. ISIS. el The Princess of Wales has received reports irons various quarters of certain proceedings Ludy held by his Majesty's Privy Council rey2cring her Royal 1 lighness; and the Princes. has felt persuaded that these repots must be unfounded, berauw abet could not believe it possible that any Resolution should be takes by that most Honourable Bode in any respect affecting her Royal Highness, upon statements which she has had no opportunity a assurer-in:, eiridaistiar, or turn ruing. " The Princess still trusts that there is no truth in these TV* moors • -but slit feels it due to herself to low mno time in Ima.. isg against any Resolution affecting her Royal Highness, which may he adopted. . • " The Mob* and Right Honourable perms who are said to have !nen selected for these proceedings, ere too Just to decide any thing touching her Royal Highness, without affordiug het an opportunity of laying her case :belore them. 'I be Princess ' has not bad auy.power to choose the Ju.ig. s before whom any inquiry may be carried on; .t.ut she is pefectly wllliag to have her (vide conduct inquired into by any p..r.otts who may be se lected by her accuiers. l'he Princess only demands that she may be heard in defence or in explaoanon of her conduct, if it Is it lacked—and that -.sot shuuoi ether be treated as innocent, or proved to be guilty." • • Lord /is 'sower rallied to the effect, that a copy of the Mi. miters Report, laid briore :be Pauses tteerscr, had hen trans. mined that sun- evening so the Princess of Vi.stes, by the Vis. count SIUMOVIII, •fl LONDlPrantti by Lay EL Ka sei Picket Place ; and published there, and at the Starsolle• Toinplf-Xiar. . . • .1.144.!