Star. — London, England, 1820-07-14 00:00:00

- want of prudence on the part of his Lordship, yet was surprised the Conn should - treat it in this w Ile was sorry to see so few at the last Common The late Lord Mayor was most unpopular, bui present had not followed his example, and yet was a Resolution condemning • the first error Lordship had committed. It was a most difficult ! tAsk his Lordship had to perform, because it w_as known the Queen herself was coming to the Hall, and what might have been the consequence? Her Majesty, too, was coming under the guidauce of an heroic Alderman, who, Whatever his opinions might now be, had not acted firmly on the memorable 2d of December, as he seemed much agitated, and went .about crying-4 , What shall I do?" He hoped the Resolutions would he withdrawn. returned to the Commons es diked, which. beiniardsrettat• cindiollirs the Messengers were again called to th Bar; and in consequence of the above the BM in question. was ret urned to 'the Messengers. . Mr. Coons, from the 'realism, brought up a Return et the amount of Shipping employed' between Grist Britain and Ire land. and between the. United Kingdoi s and the Baltic. The Bank Note Forgery Prainnion 8111 was broi& tip from the Commons, by Lord Gasarruaa Sosigaser adittilifili and read the first time. .l The Alien ,Act Continuation Nil, the Naval Prize: tas i the Irish Fisheries Encouragement , the Scots and Irifi die Militia Pay and Clothing, the Irish Maids; this. illidkiP Banks Regulation, the Royal Family's Provisions id die.Oses- Miry Office& Compensationlidis, were _brought tip lirms tile Commons, and read the first time. The Earl of LAUDERDALE presented the following p l i li i don from Mr. Atextdroza Tutees, complaining of the pod _ :ions of the Bank Notes Rill : ' 4 se TIM =IST ' 110116011,21L11 One LORDS SPILITCAL ANDISRPOSAL Or MI torn= lIMODOM Of OSZAt BIATAIN Allts 11111LAIO:S 111 PAILLILASOWT ANITJUILMS : • ' . " TRIC =MILS !MUM Or ALIXANDZI TILLOCII, OP ISLINOTOY, • " Sletreth, ".. That in the year 1797, your Pedtioner presented to the Bank of England a Specimen of a Plan of Eagraying, calculated tie•gnsvent tire Forgery of Bank Notes, accompanied with a Ckillicate, signed by Menet. Francis lisrtotoaxi, James Heath, 4 iignivers, Hellevta Rene,i, Willi am urtes re Sllrp viai l n . La L taseer , , James Haler su, and other : neatT stating, each for himself, that' /Sty could set make g off *fir; and that ' they did not believe that it could.be alpaca( tar any gnat Omni Arts of Eisgrearig ;'and recommending it to the Rinke of die Bank of England. as an Art of great merit audio vaulty, calculated not merely to detect, but copperas/ the For gery of Bank Notes. . " Viet the said Specimen_ was executed in conic ts valise permission from Mr. Giles, then Governor off ticeUilit of *gland, and on a verbal promise from him, that yen Ilit* Boner should be well remunerated by the Bank If his Specified timid not be copied, or possessed the advantages which your Petitioner ascribet to his art, and at all events that he should. be paid Tor his trouble and expenses. " 'That the Bank Engraver (then a Mr. Terry) oldie meld copy it, and Without thee months thereafter did prodaes diet ; le calla a copy. ' s I , .‘e That on the 4th of July, 1797. the saidgrZended Coll o w r ell al examined before a Committee of the Bank tors, by ,heatFhtler, Byrne, Sharp, Lanciseet, and Lowry, y lies.s h , pipets of the first eminence. who ill declared that the tended Copy was no more like the original, than a brass • • Sir like a guinea. " That sack of the Engravers as had *nod the lint * *end Caracas having, after the said examination, also 111,4 • tie said preamild Copy with the original, also gave your. • • • - Certificates to the saute diet.. • "'That the Bank rejqcsed the Plan offered-by your Petitioner. aillowed their old Plan for urns& of twenty years , • elk groat corruption of public morals, and audios of Bib s and weer paid Tier Plltiener any remuneration. ' • _..!!. That ma the appolufment . of a Royil Cemmilidinrin the per 11118, to ciummint and report en the =nesse for the pre- Wilkian of forgery , v-itrage.FiLh d ioner laid the dd. Cor hie Art,. and exhibiting lima: ent aa rttlagteff be theta, diet, not being a professisial ) Ct iz eZ Artist. thole Speilindelneitiliketanding their tented= - ' lire ha els ilniarleallelea ef. Ow Perfection of Petielotier's art vitss meiceptibk ; liad also that the *whams piked to the Bank sand to the Coaraddepen were not Weeded as the form of Netts that sheald be adopted, but only to Mee tate your Petitioner's A/1011114 the Wier( of EzeCetins at which it was susceptible ~: .• . •_. • - " The your Peddener has sloe !Crust.. sad belkeekin feet, That the Minnow adopted hitt, BMA. is tat slunk with and Mins not in the principle of. eaerdital fella the rum °gravid by Kw Petit/peer twenty-three yen Mar • _ ._• " That your Petitioner has seen a Bill. maw balite your Right - • HOW, entitled. ' A am for the further Freres don of Fergie( and •Conuterfititlng. of Bank Notes,' -lu which there are various clams, milculmed, and, as your Petitioner believes; and humbly Admits. intended to prevent him from exercising the Art of *hkh he was the original inventor; and winch, he humbly albedo, is an act o( great injuitiee " 'flat to pashlhit . the amialse of any modes of Engraving, en the pretest of preventing &rpm stands as much imposed to the p.tgress and ireproveken of the Arts, and is coasequestly se impede ask would be us prohibit die o inking for medals, buttons, and many branches of metallic or nament, on pretest, et i tkrieetng the current coin from being counterfeited, . • Tint since the said Bill was intrednoqd into the Commons House of Parliament, your Petitioner had an interview with the Right Honourable Nicholas Vansitterts. chancellor of his Majesty's Exchequer, at which were resent several of the Di rectors of the Bank of Ragland. when the mid BM was shewn to your Petitioner, with different alteradoes intended • to be made therein, by which it was alleged that your Petitioner would be at liberty to practise his own Art without Warning durgeoalties of the Rill; but no alteration was proposed therein .meted to secure to your Pedtiener any remuneration for his invendon, which, by the Bill, is now appropriated to the um ,iii &Cala of - Boillo 4 - • • " The at that interview it was contended. on the part of the Sok that the question of remuneration (if your Petitioner Ibraiid be found einftlqd ;hereto) was rather of a public than of a gabsoe nature --ehe . protection which the invention a ff ords iii/ft to the Public, who hear, exclusively, all losses by Finery of Busk Notes. , ." That your ,Petitioner, till this time, had thought, In Own- Men with the Public that itsras for die interest and advantage of the Bank to have l the integrky of its paper currency tudm paehshk; especially as the Bask had, noteelady, 'for many LT ro la s enrred eery great expense in p.-chit. ee death the ef Abele HMIs. ° par , ..,.. • .. ...t _-. ate • ` Mather, heerever, wooer atip that the Bart 414-Aertre paselsenest from the lactemed nicirity dab webs r - et Its Mas k as iiisca ki Abe • • •- • - Oerelti.r.rl:4 Mr. JAMES observed, that there could be but one opinion on the subject, and the Resolutions, bethought, deserved the warm support of the Court. It was ut terly impossible that such an act as this could pass over without any notice. Mr. Alderman WAIIIIMAN regretted that the ex planation of the Lord Mayor had been so-unsatisfac tory. The greatest jealousy had ever existed in the City on the subject of military interference; and such being the case, iris Lordship ought to have sworn in Special Constables, if any danger was apprehended. He never knew any military force being formerly called iu while the Livery were discussing their rights. The peace of the City was to be protected, but certainly net by Dragoons. Who could tell whe ther there might not be a Dragoon this moment in the vicinity of the Hall ? And who could say whe ther even the Corporation might not be overawed in future by a military force? , What, he would ask, was,the City of London, was the City of Westmiuiter, and the County of Middlesey, so totally destitute of loyalty, that they could osa meet on the distussionl of a question relative to an Address to Royalty, with-. out being overawed by soldiers? It was disgraceful to the character of the Livery to have it for a mog ment supposed that the attendance of soldiers was re quisite to protect the' in the discharge of their duties. Yet the question was not one of a - local nature, in volving, as it did, the rights of the English nation, and consequently the principles of the .British Con stitution. Permit such a practice as thii to pass with impunity, and the rights of•the subject night safely be invaded by any intruder. Englishmen were there •fore called on imperiously to resist every attempt it such irasesina, and with this view he certainly should .most cordially support the Resolutions, having no doubt they would be carried unanimously. Jur, also supported the Resolutions, as he thought them extremely moderate, and no improper motives were attributed to his Lordship, for whoat no man could feel a higher respect than he did. • Mr. GRIFFITILS and Mr. Czoot also supported the Resolutions. _ _ _ Mr. JAXE3 WILLIAMS trusted that the example held out by his Lordship would never be followed on any flame occasion. Re sincerely respected his Lord-, ship, but private feelings must give way to Public duty. The very circumstance of the military being called in, was a disgrace to the City, and a strew reflection on the character of the City Police, as it excited, or might excite a suspicion, that they were totally inefficient for the purpose of protecting public tranquillity. He lamented much that there had re cendy been so great a feeling between the Mansion- Mouse, Guildhall, and the otherend of the town, and that military should be so often used. The Public' , had had almost dreadful example at Manchester, and surely what occurred there ought to have taught the Lord Mayor, and other Magistrates, to be very cau tious how they acted in future. Mr. CLAR=E supported the Resolutions. Mr. Alderman. Won'', in a spirited sPeech, cen- 1 sured strongly the conduct of Mr. T. N. Williams, who always took the advantage of his absence to vilify him. fu allusion to what had fallen from the Lord Mayor .as to the Spa-fields riot, he would re mind his Lordship; that he (Mr: Bridges) was Sheriff then, and of counti had the command of all the peace °Ewers and constables. He ought then to have acted efficiently. instead of which, the mob were allowed fo come tuto the City without a single individual at tempting to stop them. The Lona Mayon replied, that the defence of the City was the duty of the Chief Magistrate. Mr. Alderman Woon.—The Sheriff of Middlesex is also the Sheriff of London. A marts discussion as to the point of order then took place, but-subsided on the LORD Maws threat ening to quit the Chair.--The Resolutions were then put,•and agreed to unanimously, ANZIFILI OF TB QUEEN. The Loss Maros reported the Answer of her Majesty to the Address of the Common Hall, which was read. and ordered to be asserted in the Journals. glide is es the=o* tttpdt ag ral e glee, = as is ; etl d ikt ik e Oa Bank a oungeag ar eiestOerntion ; and elle, ► con- Odom it amide' in suede* from the POl*aMa s for shia benefits which will nod" Ors totealkolakted nneeltet of fineries, and frent.the impopesepanttopublientorels, whir-Int= *flew front the lucre Dad dillicuky of conimittiega,crime, hither * suffered to be perpetrated with lamentable fealty. 6 ! That your s Pethioner's Art of Printing Notes frorn Amend of COPPW-Plates. -as hithenn, having been 'devised-mid llentriered expressly. for **purpose, if the only Body in the Ikepire whew eniplopmet et that an could is any way remit- Dena , the imountevollitslaired to appropriate his art toles own me, igkkout Esespaoilloo. .it.,s impossible that your Petitioner , as I. Enna Wog emplo by Country Banks (even CO. Nelpllllllllll otti of his poWer), receive, It gig .ap aupwatilLeCtlinneals yew. ayy Competent re in tomidoi far the exartipins pm forth by him in expense, labour, and Intel -Iw. to pal* an art, by the sd o of which (by the Bank ef )iota te , Bank [pelf azi the Nation will derive ab may - • ' • That your Petitioner, f , rays that titiy be taken into considaritiosi, r - be heard by blinifelf, COMMON HALLS. • Mr. Chamois, after some observations on the deci sion of the Kiag's Bench in the criminal prosecution instituted against Alderman Waithmaa and others, and also on the propriety of having frequent COM.' moo Hans, moved —" That it be referred to the Com mittee on the said prosecution, to inquire into the Act of 1695, relative to the power of the Lord Mayor to Common adjourn and dissolve them, and whether it VOA expedient for the. Court to pass any Act or Acts to secure to the Livery their undoubted right to meet in Common Hall for the purpose of petitioning the King or the Parliament, or to delibe rate on way matter of public grievance, and the said Committee to report accordingly." ' Afar a fear words from Mr. MdermanWAlntwativ ' Messis. T. WILLIAMS, JAMES, Dtvon, and Other s , t h e motion was unanimously agreed to, and referred ac cordingly to the Committee. The Court adjourned at five o'clock. . . . . . N 0,18,77.5 was draws This Dar a Prize of £38,000, and Sold by Casaaot.t., .at bis Offices, No. 19,. Corn lA, and 96, Oz/ord-street.--Ceneou. has also Sold ite fallowing tapital Prizes, and the fortunate holders may receive sbeir mousey au demand : , 3ise ..... ..-.ksop O r P9 AlOO 7,034......... - 4 -300 10,250_ .. ....... too . 17,254. -IVJO ISM* .............200 25. - ..... -4100 - . 1.150 •IW .1#401...1..... ....900 0000 ...... ....-210 uhrig ....... .. • - »WO ' MOS, VISO. eli iii ilitiriaie diode itispertant AlmadalNK of whisk fir ked 'twins notice; is one at the ilterior staged of the, Several of cho l a/I seatidialg for Coieraltikos ware thee gene through, and reporeectlvithout amendment. . • HUSH CHANCERY RECHYLATION ELL& The Earl of CAERNARVON asked, whether it Was the intention of ar.y of his Majesty:: Ministers pi ,titiore the second reading of the Bill for regulating the ibractice of the Irish Court of Chancery ? He said, that he understood the Bill had been introduced with the concerence of the Government ; but as nothing had, been since done to further its progress, and he thought that it was a Bill whiCh- might be prodUctive of beneficial consequences, he would 'give notice of moving the second reading, if some other Noble Lord did not express an intention of making a mo tion to that effect. Lord SIDMOUTH assured the Noble Lord that his Majesty's Ministers took no particular interest in the Bill, nor had they any intention of making any proposition on the subject. Lord REDESDALE stated it to be his opinion, that the Bill, on the general principle, would be ad vantageous ; but was in some respeets•objectionable. As it was at present framed, it would do some good, but ought to be carried further to be essentially ser viceable to suitors,in the Irish Court of Chancery. -- ``The great defect in. the Bill was, that the conduct of ( Solicitors in that Court was not affected by it, al though that conduct occasioned much mischief, and was productive of great and unnecessary expense, • ularly with regard to pleadings. The fact was, that a number of persons who were interested in for warding this Bill, were very anxious to cut down the fees of Officers, but not their own. Another thing deserving some attention, was the large fees received by Counsel at the Irish Chancery Bar. He (Lord Redesdale) during the course of his practice at the • English Bar, never received a fee of 'fifty guineas but once, and that was from the Nabob of Arcot—(A laugh) ; but tie could assure their Lord-' ships, that it was a common fen in the Irish Chan eery. Nor was it to be wondered at, when the heap' of papers that Counsel were obliged to extract . theie 'ease from was taken into consideratiim. It had often been a matter of surprize to hini, how Irish Counsel were able to make out the clear and concise case which they often did, from the , maes of complicated and voluminous documents laid' before them. That Dar, he knew from experience, contained many men of great abilities and learning, and he had often known their faculties to be put most severely to the test, to make out a clear case from the nearly unin telligible materials. It was, therefore, quite neces sary that a further reform should take plate in that, Court than what was contemplated by the Bill as it then stood-- ( Hear, beer)—but behad no objec tion that the Bill should proceed. The Earl of CAERNARVON expressed a hope that the Noble and Learned Lord would take the Bill into his own hands, as being abler to do it jus die than himself. Lord REDESDALE then gave notify of moving the second reading of the Bill tomorrow (this day). MARRIAGE ACT AWEERMENT SILL. Lord ELLENDOROUGH moved the second read ing of the Marriage Act Amendment Bill. The No ble Lord said, that it required no eloquence to im press upon their Lordships the necessity which ex isted for a Bill like the present, the reasons for it would be found in their own strong sense of justice. It was a Bill, also, which was not unknoWn to their bordships—it had appeared on their table three Ses sions in two successive Parliaments, but particular circumstances had prevented it from coming to a se cond reading, There was no. Bill, perhaps, more likely to affect•the interests of the community in a moral point of 'View, except one, and that was the 'one which it proposed to amend. It was not founded upon speculative reasoning or visionary theories, but vas deduced from an experience of the evils which bad lowed from the Act, which, unless some such measure was adopted, would continue to produie to society mischief and immorality.' He . would bn - efiy state some facts in corroboration of his positions. He would mention four cases of nullity of marriage, Which hail °littered within the last year,' and which - Were of such a nature, that if they did not induce them to pass the Bill as it then stood, would at least be stifficleneto prevail "upon them to allow it to go to a Committee, wfiete any Noble lard would he at liberty to propose-whatever alterations lie th ought proper. The first. ease was that of JOhdbtosta and Parker. The marriage between the _ _ parties took _ place in the year 1796. , There was ism* seven chil dren ; but the husband wanted five weeks' of being of age at the time of being married, and• on that _ground, in April of this year the marriage was an "maned, after twenty-four years - of cohabitation— (Hear, hear!)-.-In the secoad,rase, it appeared that' the parties had been married with the consent of the guardian of the-wife, who was appointed by will, whiCh was signed but by one witness instead of two,l and therefore the marriage was annulled. The nest rise was that of liayes and Witt& The minor, in that instance, had married with the consent of her Mother, who supposed herself a widow, her' husband having been ten years at sea, and a report having spread or his death ; but after that time he retarned, and refusing his consent, the marriage was voided: It had been contracted in - 1800, and was nullified after a cohabitation of twenty 'years: The last case _ , , therefore, . , and. thee .he ' may - was that of Jones and H a ll e w o Od ; t h e markage was ' his Agent. or Cennael, spinet Ail did W. " ALtiANDER ITLLOCH." r contracted in 1782. The h us b an d vras a m i s e r at the The pew= was releived„ Nut eituresi to be laid w en t i l i e time, and - married without consent ; and en 'the 22d i Connekten on the Bill. • of June, 1120, the marriage was declined-mill, slier . Thom or LAereseaut also preiente d a paid= f rom 'me a cohabitation of thirtyabight years. The Noble Loki m insfacturen of pd, nc h esta r, against the Calico Printers' flw. thought such a state of things could- be ..no longer (Wend to be referred to the Con on the BM. permitted. With their Lordships' regard for the ,no. Pellew's Divorce Bill was reivarleds, and ordered to be read ' rals of society, for the security of social festitutioss, l - ie third timerto-morrow. ' the Co The Lredoe Mi li tia l and the sacred interests of religion, they cou ld not rdi was brought up from nunons lip gir ills.tußTss, and read the'first time. look with indifference on facts that pme'ed how clan- The Portpatrick and Don4hadee Harbohr HU, after - a few geroasly the old law couldbe applied to sanction the remarks from the. Marquis of Dowasselees on its peculiar Ina- violation of the most solemn obligations, and to win penance, was, on his Liwdship's motion; read the Woad time. the honour and peace of families--to deprive fenialcs . The kid of CAERNARVON prementedn from Mr. Curies Pitt, against certain prinisions hi the New fitrevt BM. of the name, of wife and the honour of woman, and Viscount SIDMoUTH porose t ntcd a Petition ` lit the Lord to divest children of th e i r l eg i t i mate character stud; 11 ,.!C / 7" • this not from any fault in tie parties ig from the perjury of the husband, tvantage of his own wrong—(Hear, hearj— accidental omission of the signature of rich occasioned long-cherished prospects independence to be blasted, and threw _.. society without possession and with- The Operation . bf that - law commenced so were families circumstanced under successive generations might have gone on , from that day t o the present, regularly inheriti nc honours and property, and yet the accidental otri s ., sion of a signature, in the case of the ancestors sixty six years ago, might deprive their posterity, at the present day, of their station in society, and give over their property to others, by rendering illegitimate the children of the first parties in en or, and tin ()ugh them blemishing all their descendants. The Noble Lord then proceeded to observe upon the variations of marriage ceremonies in different countries; and is the same country at different times; by the inning tion of which ceremonie he said, that human lees: latoi.s did no more than they were competent to ( I .f-, by declaring what qualifications were necessary t o direct the descent of honours and of property; ts;: the laws of Scripture were beyond human laws, and marriages were good in the eye of Heaven, without reference to particular ceremonies, which were con gracted by persons capable of exercising a choice, d giving a mutual consent, because they were tionded on the laws of Stripture and - of Nature.— persons who dissolved such marriages; by taking advantage of their own default, or of a technical MnissiOn, and who married pin, were, in his opi nion, guilty, of the crime of adultery. When the law made the consent of guardians necessary, before the parties had attained the age of 21, it was com petent for it to do so, by reason of the necessity 1r `protecting property from improvident engagement. ; but when, on the patty attaining legal age, the guar cfian expressed no disapprostal of the contract, or within a convenient time; it was reasonable to pre sume that he acquiesced ; that he was satisfied the Marriage was in itself a suitable one ; and the reason Of the law ceasing, the consequences which flowed from it ought to cease also. But it was said, that a Bill like that proposed, was one which trifled wit!! the feelings of families. He would ask their Lord. ships to look on both, and say which trifled moiz with the feelings and interests that men ought to hold most dear? He then adverted to tYe inconsis:- ency in the laws, which allowed a rbaniage withn the degree of consanguinity to be good after the death of one of the parties, as it affected the chil dren; while one that was informal by a casual omis sion, could not be rendered valid by any length of time. His Lordship stated, that the Bill went upon a principle which was not unprecedented, for a simi lar principle had been recognised in a Bill passed by the Irish Legislature, which he said had passed many excellent laws, and much superior to many which British legislation could boast. The Irish Bill con fined its operation to persons having property under the qualification of £lOO yearly in teal, and I.:500 in personal possession. There was a clause in that Bill which said, that if the guardian took co step within a year, the marriage. -should he unimpeach able, and to all intents and purposes valid. But then the Bill made the 'marriage valid from the ter mination of the year, and not from the date of the marriage itself: this was wrong, as by that means r use eldest son might lose his legitimate rights. It was his wish to establish the validity of marriages, in which The guardian took no . adtei se step within a -year from the time of the marriage itself. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that the Noble Lord had ably discussed the malts of the - Bill ; but he'could not consent to its g .ing into a Cennnittee. He acknowledged that cases had been stated in sup port of the amend the present law f wherein he confessed it was difficult to restrain the feelings; they certainly were not sufficient to warrant a Bill with a retrospective operation as far back as the year 1754, upon which Act the law solely stood.; and that a Bill which would. go to shake all these rights derived un der the established law, as would or maybe done by the application of the first, clause in, this Bill, though a provision towards the end of the Bill, he knew, may be said to have a saving effect, yet, property to an incredible amount, with titles, pensions, and other valuable possessions, held under the established law, may be seriously affected by it. Haling dwelt on these points in the way of illustration, the Noble and Learned Lord observed, the present was not a season of the year when they could beneficially go into a consideration of a Bill of such extensive importance. There was a clause also in it, which went to legalise all marriages, though founded upon the most frau dulent perjury, and the distinctions were so drawn, that it would be better to say at once that all were good, than to legislate in the very exceptionable way proposed by this Bill. No Man cciul4. be more desir ous to uphold the dictates of morality, o r t o a dhere to the dates of religion, than himself; bet be was yet - to be convinced hour these desired ends could be - attained by such a till as the present. It, therefore, being so framed, and coming before them at a period in which full and deliberate discussion could not he expected, he could not consistently affiard the mea sure his support. The Earl of WESTMORELAND differed in many points from his Noble and Learned Friend. He thought the Bill at least should receive • a locoed readin;, and be sufßred to go to a Committee, where the Objectionable parts Could eegularly be discussed and amended, and it could be seen how-far the Bill `Was susceptible 'of amendment. If this was found impracticable, why then reject it. The Bill was to amend the Act of the 26th of George 11. cochlea— "An Act to prevent Clandestine Marriages." 'lhe Bill appeared to him founded on the spirit and prin ciple of that Act, a principle which was long ackom. , 'edged to be salutary and good. He mid, that these was a principle of Hinitanon to the power of bringing actions, in cases of death, and the pcmession of pro perty; and he saw no mason wh e ythere should itte be a limitation with respect to marriages. In cans of property, a man established a title by sixty yrais quiet possession, although that possession had com menced in wrong ; but, as the law now stood. not even silty years quiet possession could give a man a title to big wife---(Lerighter).--The cases cited by tit' . Noble Lord (Ellenborouh) were very stri lig. Tic knew. that • their Lordships ought not t o legislate individual Cans o . but they were such as ought to ~t - l 14 '• ' i ''- , . . - • ••• ..... r• . . . . .. . , . ~ ' • al. „„:,,, , . . v • . . , ' • - . , .. v, • • . . , . . . 4" . .., . '''' • _ ... • • • - We, . Illijk - . . et Dian . 115.404 111 gri11e property--and thi .• . • .''.& k,4 - ~ 1 .1.; t • „ 3 , ti • ... • • ,Illall .' - Bal• • ' .: • 4 f,„. injured; but arisin g . - I the part of his Lordship, yet lot ' '6;ourt should - treat it in this wai. ' Mutt Oli • !... J.,, . 1. ra d e i n , it" ' , ' • s un s. ---'. taking advantage is d r IP' ' kir - fmni the accid so few at the last Common tall: - A New wits bisisclit,sy . 6 ' . c• • v t— ' r all it , - is Trade lea 41 . • Catelliit,' • •.. _era a Viitness, which o ~ . . ror was most unpopular, but lbe 01 , 0 god erbitt............ 31 1 1 0beAtt• • • doe, • ' el* and . 1 \ die ra t pr i me d, ‘., -' ' _.__- _of honour and ind lowed his example, and yet here pi .'" ati be r r .'...‘".. IL t heir would anise the • 4 Own colverstdom thou toof place betviewe _um AWY. SC :1 condemning • the fi rst error bis 112 I : l b, em , e tt oh m o i• e mniniam . _ M arqu i s aid d ie s o m a L ar d Da t b s. w ar d r: L sei pp e ap s _the me sufferer en so mined. It was a most difficult The Messengers withdrawn from the Dar, • &an Fern , ot , dm . Caigtall t ak alas Calnaitnialhar' std the out itt W e ' Th e td to perform, because it was well The Earl of SRA BURN moved tint 'die Mid , Bill'be ober acapolowfbtlf $ at objects nearly similar, the rem* in 1764; and so s . .. .. ...........1 t., ti... e/11111111111l 111 dlidirfli. which beinicordwork ay , Glyn" wag, th a t t ha 1")4 and Leenbild 143e1 stated • he it, that alc . ve . . - IF I r \