Star. — London, England, 1820-07-14 00:00:00

cblce them to take the law under which they 'were, a:lowed into their serious consideration. Lord REDESDALE supported the objectionsof his Noble Friend on the Woolsack.. Much pod he thought, would be attained, and a gr e a t d ea l of ;hat was complained of in the present case, by the doing a way the present mode of license for marriages, for which no reason seemed to obtain, but the partiality of individuals of rank to that mode. The practice of marriage by banns was greatly preferable. Lord CALTHORPE spoke in favour of the Bill. He thought the present, under the circemstances, an appropriate time for some amendment to be made in that part of the law. _ _ The Earl of LIMERICK argued in favour of their 7,ordships entertaining the Bill, which ht thought it would be better to read the second time; and, if deemed preferable, its detailed consideration in a I: ,, mmittee might be put off to another session. Lord ELLENBOROUGH thought, that between the moral evils which really existed, and those said to be apvreltended from the Amending Bill, there was no fair comparison. At the least, the Rouse should attempt its amelioration in a Committee, and sot appear to discountenance the principle of such a Bill.--The Question was then called for, when there appeared— Contents Not co:flea - Majority for the second reading • --6 The House immediately adjourned till to-morrow. HOUSE OF COMMON! The Srmarsta took the Chair at a quatter to four o'clock. Mr. LOCK II ART presented a Petition from the Merchants and Ship-owners engasvd in the Baltic Trade, and in the. Timber Trade of North America, azainst any alteration in the existing Duties.— Laid on the table. The f,xchequer . Bills in Aid Bill, the late King's Servant? Bill, and the London Militia Bill, were read a third time and passed. Dir. MA 13 ER LY moved for an Account of the total amount of Revenue, from the Sth April, 1820, to the Sth of July, 1890, diitinguishing the Revenue of England from that of Ireland; also an Account of the DefiCiency on the Consolidated Fund , during that period, and how that deficiency was made good.— Ordered. The Extra Po tage Bill was read i thltd date and passed. after a short coorermation between Mr. LOCKMAZT, Mr. Um. ....vcroN, Sir J. GICAMAJI, Mr. BERNAL" and Sir faux Corrur. .1 '3lr. BO WELL said, be had to call the attention of the house to a subject which particularly affected a class of in ions persons in Scotland, who were liable to be prosecuted for carrying persons in carts or carriages with two wheels. The lion. Member then moved.--'4 That there be laid before the Douse an account of all prosecutions in such cases. for twelve months before the sth July last."—The motion was agreed to. On the motion of Dr. LCUIINGTOY, the Education Endow ments Bill was read second time, and ordered to be commit ted to-n.orrow. The Drinaghadee Harbour Bill *as read the third time then passed- _ It ;VJS ordered that the Committee on the Guadeloupe Claims have leave to Report their opinions thereon to the House. Air. GO LBURN brought up the Sea Offences Bill Report. Sir ISAAC COFFIN saki, the object of this Rill was, to carry the pruswions of Lord Ellenborouglis Act into the _merchants service, a measure that ought to have taken place seventeen years ago. The Bill was urgently called for frora the capricious t: ranny exercised over seamen in the merchants' service. 4r J. YORKE vindicated the conduct of merchants towards stamen under them. Sit ISAAC COFFIN, in proof of the fact, instanced thecae of a seaman who had been left on a desolate island by a Captain of a merchant vesseL Sir W. currrrs contended, that no case of wanton severity could be made out against the Captains of merchant vessels. The severil Amendments were agreed to. On the motion of Dr. LUSWINGTON, the House resolved itself 1!7:0 a Committee on the Education Bill ; and the Report having I ben brought up, it was ordered to be taken into further cosoi cleration this day six months. On the motion of Mr. FLANKLAND Law's, the House resolved itself into a Committee on the Turnpike Regulation Bill, and the Ripon was ordered to be received this day three months. A person from the London Bridge Company presented Rte• fern, of all Monies belonging to the Bridge House Estate.—Or dared to lie on the table. Oa the ni ,tion of Sir Wnu►at Coins, the Returns were or dered to b; printed. Mr. ',USW NGTON moved the Order of the Day for the third reading of the Post Horse Duty Bill. Mr. STUART WORTLEY proposed several clauses, by way of rider, regulating the mode of proceeding in bringing ac tions under the Bill.—The clauses being agreed to, they were added to the Bill, which was read a third time and passed. PROTESTANT DISSENTERS. Mr. W. SMITH said, he held in his hand the Pe tition of a very respectable body of men, bet on whom, as he himself belonged to their number, he should pronounce no eulogium, lest it should appear to come from a suspected source. It was the Peti tion of the Protestant Dissenters—members of various Congregations in the Metropolis and its vicinity— praying the House to consider the situation in which they had so many years been placed, by the disquali fying Statutes, commonly called the Test and Corpo ration Acts. It was signed by about one hundred persons, of different Congregations, and expressed the sense of all. Had he chosen to rely more oa the number if signatures than on the reason of their prayer, 100,000 names might as easily have been ob tained as 100. The truth was, that the lawsin ques tion were framed to meet the danger of a Popish suc cessor, and for the defence . of religious liberty. It was thought expedient to establish certain tests, and to this expedient the Dissenters of that day, as he thought, unwisely submitted. The consequence of that submission was, that they had met with the fate which often attended the liberal-minded and Incas'. tioos, and were unable to recover what they had v&. luntarily surrendered. It was not for him to give a character to the Petitioners ; and if it were, he could not do it in more eloquent terms than had been em plosed by his Honourable Friend (Mr. Brougham),' in describing them. At present, he did not intend to do more than to move, that the - Petitiai be receivecl. Whilst it asserted their own just rights, it was draws up in language perfectly respectful to the House, and to the Constitutional Government of the Country. Although he founded.upon it 11 4 1 Motion at present, it might be his lot, .ere long, to bring forward some proposition on the subject. .The.-Petitioncrs,- COO' scions that they had. bean. oolformly ; loyal, and at tached to the Constitution, bad ace imut.of. anyessmi nation before the tribunal of the pudic. .They con-' sidered themselves indeed to.be barshlysroated by an , exclusion from advantagesenjoyed liy the rpst Of their fellow -subjects. They complained, At . tAhnt.,,theY excluded from office, .but fronctisteligibittlY:ol•ol-' fice. The pluses:ion of , officeissost.be.confined to t few; but eligibility was the right-Of sill, and the de privation of it was a punishment often iaiapd on otTences of a gross and scandalous.nature. It was but that very morning that fie met with.an Act :of Parliament which subjected Revenue Oitcers in Ire land, convicted of fraud, to this very disqualification, under which the whole. body of Protestant Dissenters Is4otired. Ile now moved,-" That the Petition be brought up." Lord NUGENT, .in seconding the uintion.,ool. served, that the prioc.ipiumf kleinsumsfremsliv4fillk 041' account of a di ftm.a in religious blVii way's appeared to hAn ananowli A in a free ri/Pr. tution and an enlightene d age. H hiiniiff had .4 'Petition from that respectable body, the Raman CIO 'holies of England ; and in declining to present k this .Session, he was influenced only by a waif denulon, of the awful and immediate importance of that Question which now engaged the public mind. He must, however, be permuted to say of it, that it contained most satisfactory answer to the often-renewed chary! of a divided allegiance. The Petition was then biought up and read., Mr. W. SMITH, in m ov i ng .4 That it be prfitted," observed, that t h e quest i on to w hi c h i t referred had not been directly discussed for the last thirty years; ' but he could not let s lip t h e oppor tunity of reviving it in the first Session of the first Parliament of anew reign. SIR PATRICK MURRAY. Mr. A BERCROMBY wished that it Noble Friend of hie (Lord Archibald Hamilton) would osittodict a mistatetnent which had got abroad, relative to what bad fallen from him in a late debate, as to the motives of Sir Patrick Murray in accept ing the office of Baron of the Exchequer , in Seotisind. His Noble Friend was supposed to have said, that his Majesty's Go vernMent, fearing that Sir Patrick Merril would be an incon venient Candidate for Perthshire, 'had therefore appointed him to that office. Lord ARCHIBALD HAMILTON professed the* utmost readiness tocontradict the tnistatentent in question, and regretted that be Lid not been applied to for this purpose at an earfier pe riod: His Lordship stated, that be alluded to another quarter, in regard to the political i n t eres t s i n P ert h s hi re , an d did not im pute what had been understood to Sir Patrick Murray.. VICTUALLING OP TROOPS. Colonel DAVIES moved, that there be laid before the House Copies ef a Correspondence between Mr. Trevor, of the Coln missariat Department, and the Board of Treasure,- relative to the Victualling of Troops, Convicts, and when, in the Colonies. After a few words from the CHANCILLOK of the Eienimean, the Motion was agreed to. MARY•LA•EONNE BARRACKS. On the second reading of the Bill being moved, blr. CALCRAFT said, be should oppose the se cond reading of this Bill, but as be bad already spoken en the subject, he should 4 1 0 t tresplass on the atten tion of the House for many minutes. He could assure Gentlemen, though they did not seem willing to pay attention to the subject, that at a time when the saving of every thousand pounds was of importance, this question was well deserving of attention--a Bar:- rack for the second Regithent of Life Guards. He bad no objection to the building of a Barrack fur this Regiment, nor did he object wait place (the Regent's Park), where it was to be built, but he contended, that economy had not been considered. The Barrack Board had considered that these troops, being lodged in King -street, Portman-square, paid for their lodg ing and stabling £5400 a-year; and they . thought they did enough if they built Barrackawhich diclacit entail on the country a greater expense. They had granted an annuity of £.5400 for thirty-dneyears, which, at five per cent. was worth £84,000; at six per cent. £70,000. He compared this expense With the charge for Barracks for the same number of.troops in other parts of the country, and.making every al lowance for difference of place, it was mulch too high. At Leeds, the expense of Barracia r for about the same number of Cavalry, was £2B ; ooQatt Glasgow £15,000. He-would allow something akp fOr the appearance of a Barrack suited tathe place . .The necessity for building these Barracks at this thus was Stated to have arisen from notice having been given to quit the premises they now oceepied - The Chancellor of the Es cnequer assented j. —He could state, however, that the Lindlord of the premises would be glad to grant either a lease on the present terms, or to sell the pre mises- The £3400 a-year could not be, as it had been stated, the rent of the premises, but must include also billet-money, - for the rent alone had only been £1585. He thought that it would have been better that the -Regiment should have continued to be ac commodated, wider all the circumstances, for-a time in the same manner. But it seemed to be the idea that the sanction of the House of Commons was a matter 9f course, for the walls were (whilethey were debating about the matter) already twelve feet high ! The Hon. Gentleman observed, in the course of his speech, that £Bl,OOO had been already voted for that service, which, with the purchase-money of the an nuity, would make £1.58,000, and this was done when, within a few years, eight millions had been voted for that part of the service. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER ad mitted that the views of the Honourable Gentleman were brought forward in a most candid manner, and that a saving of even £lOOO was In object not un worthy of-consideration in the 'present circumstances of the country. But he maintained that the Hon. Gentleman's observations upon the subject before the House-were incorrect. The propriety of having the Life Guards in London, or its immediate vicinity,. could not be questioned, and the only question was, as to the best or cheapest mode of providing for their accommodation. The rent of the place upon which it was meant to erect the new Barrack, was equal to . £l5OO a-year, and the sum which it was proposed to grant for the. purpose of the building was 1:5400 a-year for thirty-one years. At present and during the war, the rent paid for the accommodation of the Life Guards was £6OOO a-year ; and now, upon the score of economy, the question was, whether the Public should continue to pay this £6OOO a-year rent, or, by allowing £5400 a-year, for thirty-one years, to erect- a substantial building, which would serve the purposes of the Public for a considerable number of years, eta, comparatively low rent, while by the same,irisaatire the expense and contingencies of the Regiment must be also- reduced ? But the Honourable Claskt,leman. would have . this proposition ,postponed until Oa seat year, forgetting, perhaps, ( that Abtough, tuch postpone:Rent .Parliament would tretiAt9ol7.i44 . 4 ealuitarily saddle the country with -au efßoWle.o44W The expense for building the ,4m4clc. , fiat tht LefeOuardsin.Hyde Park amounted IA aokssgukfif*/40, ...which slim, considering the irld,l44cod.ftris4. - ..af4lahour and materials, might be r * TAtfit-4 lhe>pasatut day _at about1:70,000. Now, onsidetjag* grouter extent .of the proposed build -jag in tba;llemat'aiPArk, he submitted that the vote NI-erred tQ.iu.‘he Bill. _before the-House was an me tionalc arrangement. - The bargain, indeed, uponthis spbeectwas,.he.comaived, very advantageous fot the ,Pnblic. ;With respect to thellonourable s .Member's complaint, stbat-tha building of these Barracks bid. cararneWetl.isetote.the consent ef,Parliament was ob -14.40,. the fact, was, .that. the ,contract with the builder was signed on the 30th of Jane, . but, that contract having been agreed on some days before, the 1 . . on Eon the 1101444 - 161 bmak‘,llP /7 tlit, Mr 91104 for 40 alflu. the th of July, he (t ht 91. 4 11 041 ,4 - Eeelteopkeohwusikttlorn the con• 4 V - 4,.ta TM for thepT of appllyiqg for die teuseet Parliament,. out writ smekent Wilt expense of th is belldlng- co not, Oretiers4 be flefrityed . friste the pthfic perse. • Lord NUGENT said that he concurred in the -views bE his Hoo. Friend below him, declaring, how mart at the sante time, that his objection to the Bill before the House rested upon general grounds. It mattered 'not to hint whethe r B arr should els ould be built in one place or in another, of what 'night be the expense of such buildings, as such peints were, his view, of - minor consideration,' for be objected the buildieg of Barracks at hear 1 On Opposition benches) and his objection was rounded upon the very same reason that induced the Noble Secretary at War avowedly to support them, He objected to the barrack system as _highly uncon stitutional, because it served to draw a line of de marcation, or to break that connection and inter course between the soldiery and thp people, which ought to - subsist in a free country. He disapproved, indeed, of the barrack system, because, as BraCkstone observed, it operated to prevent that circulation of feeling 'and opinion between the citizen and the sol dier which was essential_ to the maintenance of it free Constitution. These sentiments might be deemed old-fashioned or unpopular in that House, but he would still continue to support them, because they were congenial with th e principles of constitutional liberty—because they were consecrated by the high authority of Sir George Saville and Lord Chatham' —because they were sanctioned by the eminent wis dom and political purity of Si r William Jones, whose sentiments with regard to the best means of providing for the defence of the country, enforced as those sen timents were by the genius, the judgment, and the public spirit of the writer, ought to be engraven in gold, for the instruction tied guidance of that House. The Noble Secretary at War had observed, that the barrack system was advisable, with a view to pre serve a corporate system in the army; but he depre cated that system precisely because it had the ten- I dency which the Noble Lord applauded, and parti 'cularly because the existence of such a corporate spirit could not be too strongly deprecated at a period of peace. But this Barrack system, it was peculiarly the duty of the friends of liberty to with stand, as it evidently led to the establishment of a Military Government. He, however, begged Gen tlemen to consider the fate of the Military Govern ments of the Continent, which were in a state of dis traction, and nearly crumbling to atoms. This was indeed the case of every one of those Governments, ,the Turkish Government alone excepted, which had been able to controul civilization and intellect. It was known from all the records of history, that a Government which depended alone for security on a military force, stood upon the most precarious grounds. History indeed afforded the most impres sive lessons upon this subject ; the Governments which relied alone upon the fidelity of the sol diery being very frequently the victims of the passion and caprice of that very soldiery, as was the' case with regard to the Pretorian bands of Rome..and the Janissaries of the East—(Hear, hear). But how Many cases had occurred in which tho sol didry dethroned the very man by whom they were ' most favoured, and to whom they were peculiarly the objects of confidence. There was indeed a cer. lain recent event in this country, into the details 'which he should not enter, but which was calculated to afford much useful instruction upon the subject. Noble Secretary at War had thought proper to nttsibute what he (Lord Nugent) obierved on a for- Wier evening to political feeling. Yet he would - not retAiate that charge, nor was he disposed to make any such charge upon his-Majesty's Ministers. But he felt it his duty to say, that if Ministers coolly and deliberately determined upon the establishment of a Military GOvernment ire this country, they could not take a more effectual course for their object than by doubling the peace establishment of the Army, and covering the country with Barracks—(Hear). In • reeding the history of the present times, there were certain questions which our posterity worald naturally pet, and which it might not be amist on this occa sion to repeat in that House. They would ask how it happened that in the year 1819, the trade and ma nufactures of England - should be in a state of unpre -Icedented distress, after the conclusion of a war un dertaken and prosecuted, as its advocates declared, ,to obtain " indemnity for the pa s t and secur ity f or the futur e 7' also, why the military force of the coun ts; should be mere than doable its usual peace iota- Ishshment at a period of universal peace? and also why orders should be made for the erection of Bar racks throughout the country, and additional ex pense thus unnecessarily incurred, while our finances Were in such a condition that our annual expeudi4 Nacre could not be defrayed without the aid of loans?, (Hear). On a late occasion, he made a motion with t to certain additional allawances, which 'bd were granted to the Guards when em 4 tileyed in preserving the peace of the Metropolisi 'The Secretary at War 'stated, thet seek elloviapets here always_ made in kind. NOw he found from the apepan to his motien, which was laid before the Hama, that the allowance alluded to was 9d. a day to each Non-commiesioned Officer and soldier who should be so employed, such allowance to be dis posed of according to the direction of the Command ing (lacer. Hence it appeared that the public money had been granted in a way unknown to that House, and which had never been acknowledged or stated in the Estimates laid before Parliament. This he could. not help thinking a most reprehensible pro ceeding;_atill,• _however, through a consideration for the spirit of theximes, he should refrain at present from !flaking any raotion upon the subject. But with respect to Ile:Motion before the House, he should never case to septa bate the system to which it re. retied, while. he lied the honour to be a Member of that House.—A division then took place, and tl , numbers were= • • •- 98 40 , :F6r Ito motion - against* - - Pdajority - - - --411 The Bill was accorfpnerrel!d, a second dawns) P r 4ero W b e e°Wrn i (cif i 43411 P r 0 v. •scoTOML sums OM IrL 113 0 1 ORder Jot . ..the P4r.3est mid .for the ßouse going into a Committee on tl.is • • Sir J..M4RJOItIBANKS moved, is an, instruc- / s . .~ _ • • • on to the CClDMielll, toluptal the 59th of Geo. 111. :by which acestain Day was imposed cm Barley, and to substitute for its Daty of a less amonnt. A question of order hose, whether this instiuttiou could be received by did" Retie. After seine hire by the gPRAIERR, Mr. GRANT, Mr. BARIUM, and the Cuatcciuttamt of the EXCNIQUIR, the instruction was withdrawn. ; Lord A. HAMILTON complained that the Chan cellor of the ExcbetpuT did pot take this subject into liis consideration at an earlier period of the Session. The subject was pressed upon him, but he postponed its consideration , until the Session was nearly closed. By the 59th of GeOrge HI. the perpetual Duty im posed on Malt in Scotland was 2s. 6d. and the an nual Duties were 7d. in Scotland, and , Is. 3d. in Edgland. Since then, an Act was passed repealing both these Duties, and Is. was imposed on both.— Thus the Duties were reduced; in England by 3d, ,and increased in Scotland by sd. In Scotland, also, there was a Tax imposed on Beer, which did not `exist in this country, and which was altogether inde rndent of any Duty imposed by th e - Right Hon. ,gentleman. With respect to the distilleries in Scot land, the regulations lately made by tie Right Hon. Gentleman, had the effect of preventing" Any large distilleries from continuing to work in Scotland. If It bud been his intention by those regulations to en courage -the small distilleries, the Duties on Malt had the effect of counteracting those intentions. the result was, *the increase of unlic ense d di st ill er i es i n that pa rt f the United Kingdom. Ur. DUNDAS agreed with *the Noble Lord in the correctness of his statements, and the propriety of is object ; but contended, that the delays were not to be attributed to his Right Hon. Friend (the Chan. cellor of the Exchequer), but to those who had it in their power to make the presett application earlier, pnd who had not done so. • The House then went into the Committee. Sir J. MAItJORIBANKS said, that he must op pose the Bill. He complained of the precipitancy with which it had been brought forward, while most of the Members intorested were in Scotland. Ile thought it hard to exkraceas high a Duty from the poorer country, Scotlalsd, as from England. He generally supported Ministers, but he would oppose 'diem on this measure in every word—(A Most people who visited Scotland, did- them the honour to acknowledge the superiority of their Agri culture, and the Right Hon. Gentleman, in laying on the additional Duty, had given as -one reason why the Scotch Malt was able to bear as heavy a Duty as the English, the improved state of Agricul ture in Scotland: but was it ever before in the world offered to impose a heavier Duty on any people, be cause they used more skill and industry tlkan their neighbours'—(flear, hear).--He had refused to pre sent a Petition against t ! he Bill; because he did not think at the time that the Right Hon. Gentleman was in earnest in laying on the new Duty ; he did lust believe that he would even persist in it. He pointed out the effect which heavy Duties had in diminishing consumption, and thereby impairing the resources of the Revenue. When he (Sir J. MArjori banks) was a young man, he recollected very well that claret was no more than £l5 per hogshead ; now it was from £lOO to £llO, and the consequence was, that no claret was drank there at ail--(lfeer, hear, and lauglster).—John Home, the anther of Douglas, had written— Hardy and bold the Caledonian stood, n Cold was his'mutton, and his claret good; '4 " . " Let him drink port,' the haughty Statesman cried; " He drank ¶he poison, but his spirit died !" - But what said the Statesman now, when he was do longer able to taste porto nor even whiskey ? Let him drink beer ! Yet the prophecy of John Homo had not been Tully realized, he had drank the poison but the spirit had not died—wit ness severa l proo f; which the enemy had received of the contrary during the late war—(Gheers).--The House resumed, and the Report was ordered to be received to-morrow. MISCELLAWILII. The Report on the Sale of Spirits' Bill was brought u?, the Amendments were agreeeto, ind the Bill was ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. The Report of the Committee on the Spirit Intercourse MU was brought up, and the MU was ordered to be reed a thltd time to-morrow. It was ordered that to-morrow the House should *solve itself into a Committee an the Irish Distillers' Bill. '• The House resolved itself into a Committee on the Scotch Distilleries Bill. A clause was added, by way of rider, the H come resumed, the Report was brought up and read, an d the Bill passed. The Irish Insolvent Debtors' Bill passed. • Mt. MARTIN moved, that the Order which stood for to. morrow, requiring the attendance at the. Bar of the /louse, of the Printer and Publisher of the Morning Herald, should be dis charged—The Order was accordingly discharged. • • On t h e motion being ma*,that the Mow ,cio..atliOuro, General HART rose to camellias' of some unlawfulproceed ings which he said had lately hk en place in Ireland ; and 're ins which be wished to have some explanation from -a. .t Hon. Gentleman, whom he then saw in Ms place. lie iimderstood that a man, suspected -of having smuggled • tobaeito .his possession, had been fired at near Derry, and shot through the body by tome officers', before any questions were put to him, before be could have my time or *portenier t 0 make - tin miplanation respecting this bsisineos. fie wished to Irstow•iLE account of this transaction bad been officially communi to Government? Thera . a& another eiresmistinee on ' efts he wished to have some information. Wei peraone-bAd be tried for most heinous offences, and afterwards readveta reds •wisheth know at whose recententiffiffiem s - mid Cle lliL hat cause, this bad beep dope T • oi The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER seidabat his Right Hon. Prierid. the Secretary for lieland, tritc4lone was competent to glye an answer to these questiOns, bad gene away from the House • and as he Massif was ignore re of t h e Amw a y, hided to by the Hen. General, he could ere bin no information sespecting.them.. His. Right Hun. FHend, "bOvreVer, ieow4 he hi his place to-morrow, and be ready to give arty esylanation is his power to the Hon. General. The other Orders of the Day wete'then disposed • ef, and the House adjourned. THR MINORITY - • miaow vu tILL roa Smarm saw lisalAclat at ma moasart's ealti.:••IVLT Abercromby, Hn. J. Pergusson, Sir R.C. Orli, Winton Hon fitaom. Lard C. • Powleu,. Ham Wm. Henry Graham, J. R. G. Palmer, C. .rys:bi Sang; R. Gram, Sandra(' .n*a., G. Inn.* Somihrft Sir J. P. ,Greet, J, p. Reboots, atom Burets, S. 'Clenorchy, Lord Rowley, Sir Wai n . Netts, John • Hathilloo, teird A.' *nut. • Calcraft, J. IL ..Solthosse, i, 1 0. rionservits. coiburne, N. R. Uutchinson,Hn.C.ll,TayloirlL A. Calvert, Chutes ' 'Herrifieete, Ste O. Whit* j a l u f - • Coffin, Sie Ism .• Lemma-SON. Wffies;.reog ias =e jn lAcz e . a. F ;ii r ei, n4t ;i f , it t. Han. , Davies, T. H. • SI14; Calera% John Mike, Edward Newman , at. W. N ugent, Lent I j, FIE ;ff1;114 •iti - - 9 , .... • . *.