Star. — London, England, 1827-03-02 00:00:00

141 v p. C . i t .v 4 . fts, ((tit* 4-oth-t -1 tiCifY./,,e4t NUMBER 1 i.VMBER _ a.. 96 • TO b yte BRICKI.A RESIDIN G IN lIRS, CARPENTERS, Sce. 'HIS PARISH. St. Staryiebooe, February 24, 1227. PERSONS desirous of Contracting with the Vestry .w. a Sr. blaryiebose, for Bricklayers, Carpeours, Thews, Painters, and Glaziers work, at a stipulated poet for pot Tear, from Lady Day neat, for all such work as may be re vered floe time to time, the sow to be dose under the directions i t tin Sairnyor of the said Venttymen, are requested to entail at he Curet House, Oxford-street, _with Proposals sealed op and as 2811112111 AT, the 24th or Mir& Mit, at Rileven • Clock PK * * Farther Particulars they be Mows, and SpeciSeadadi Gwen, by gr ope to dos Perk at the Court Heath. By Order of the Vestry, J. EL OILESNWELL, Vestry Clerk. N.B. The Vestry pay their Mb fear dates a Year. This day was published, M. price es. a New Edition (being the Third), with considerable Additions, - - - - - - - .4ERVOUS DISORDERS, Sts. &c. BPeit. By JOHN THOMAS, M.D. itysiciao at Cheltenham, ome or die Playskiame to the Cheltenham' Diepeasary, many years Mmidamt Physician at Tastiest*, and Member or several loused aidedm Printed for T. and G. Usisnispep iPs, Fleet-street. iilieVS - a - nAt la post tiro. the Second Edifice, price as. 6d. boards, (OK VILLAGE; ` sketches of Rural Character and t NJ',Seenerir. RI MARY RUSSELL IidITFORD. Volume %be Soma. By the same Author, L A New &kiwi of the First Volume of Ova YE:aeon. Price 14 Ad S. Jamie; a Tragedy. /Ivs price da. 4. ikacilat; a 'raptly. Ito. price Is. In the press, Danielle Scorn. By Miss Mitford. Printed for Geo. U. Whittaker, Ave Maria-lane. 1071 AN CATHOLICISM IN SPAIN AND PORTUGAL Jest pubilsbed, In One large and closely printed Volume, ave. price IS-. boards. THE HISTORY of the INQUISITION of SPAIN, from the Time of its Establishment to tbe Reign of Ferdi nand VII. Composed from the Original Documents of the Ar abes of the Supreme Osumi, and from those at subordinate Tri bunals of the Holy. Mee. Abridged and Translated from the Original Works nif • D. JEAN ANTOINE LLORENTE, Formerly Seereury of the !origami, Chancellor of the Unl vorsity of Toledo, etc. ate. In Sow price 16.. extra boards, I. SKETCHES of PORTUGUESE LIFE, MANNERS, CUSTLIMIL; and CHARACTER; illustrated by Twenty - co. Jeered Engravings, illustrative of the Customs of the Canary, par tiadarlp of the Religious Ceremonies, etched by the Author. Printed for Gru. L Whittaker, Ave Maria.lane. Tbk day waspublisbed,in 1 large VoL. prier ISa. in beards, VINDICLE CHRISTIAN/E. A comparative Estimate et the Genius and 'Tendency of the Greek, dos Hinds, the Maimartedan, and the Christian Religions. By tire Rev. JEROME ALLEY, LLB/ dI.LL A. Ste. Printed tog T. Cade% Strand, Landes; /11. Dahlia; 104 W. Blackweed, Ediabossli!, This day was published, Illustrated by Maps, the First and Second Volumes, pries lilt. in boards, of finlE ELEMENTS of GENERAL HISTORY, Ancient and Modern. To which are added, a Teas of 4.luonology, and a Comparative View of Ancient and Modern l'eftraPhY• By the late Honourable A. F. TYTLER, Lord Weadhonselee. The Ninth Edition, corrected, and with considerable additions, II Hawes, Nano, U.D. Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford. Kr Also, lately pabli.ised, and sold separately, a Third Volume; coutinuing the Work .froas the deatks of Queen Anna and Louis XIV. to the denthe of his late Majesty, King Geier 111. By ik. Naas& Second Edition, prier tos. 6d. in boards. Printed Mr T. Cedell. and Longman and Co. London; J. Anderson, jun. and Stirling and Kenney. at Edinburgh. • MR. ROSCOE'S HISTORICAL WORKS. This day was published. handsomely printed in Fassr Vols. Pao. Fs ts. in boards. The Third Editiee,eorteeted by the Anchor, of I.'I'HE LIFE and PONTIFICATE of LEO the TENTH, with additional Observatleos an the Criticisms sad Remarks of toe German, Italian, and French Translators of tlst Wools. 2. The bre of Leitrim sr Mem:, Sixth Edition, corrected by ttie Malice, Lately published, in Two Vols. live. prke 4e. in boudu O. luveranwou of the Lira of Lamm) no Mom; in One Vol. ova ornamented with Plates, peke 140. In horde. Printed for T. Coded, Strand, Landes ; and W. Blackwood, Edinburgh. This day were published, In Two Volumes Bra price is.. in hoards, a New Edition, bring the Sixteenth, of THE ELEMENTS of CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY; containing Pr..ofs of the Atillienticity of the Holy Scrip ture; a Summary of the' History of the Jews • a brief Statement of the Contents of the several Books of the Old and New Testa• ntenu•. a short Account of the English Translations of the Bible, and of the Liturgy of the Church of England; and a Scriptstral Etpesition of the Ildrty.nicie Articles of Religion. Designed prin.' tiPay fur the Use of Young Students in Divinity. By DEOROR TOWLINE, D.D. F.R.S. Lied Map of Winchester. 7110 Ire Volume of this Work, being an Introduction to the shady of the Bible, is printed separate, in Ittno. is. in boards. Printed fOr T. CadeU, in the &rand; and W.Elackwood, Edin burgh. Of wham may be had, by the mane Author, A Rarer/moo of CaLvuutat ; new &lithe (being the Stealth), •ee. price tee. in boards. HENRY L. COOPER, 93, BISHOPSOATZ.STREZT Wmini. submits to the Public the following Articles, at Prices decieelly icasesiable, for Furniture of superior Style sad Masufactsre: IiIIiOLSTERF Four Pour. French, and Tent Beds, Window Curtains, and Mosquito Furniture*. CABINET WORK—Of the first quality and Materials; also solid Furniture fur Foreign Climates. SHIPPING—Cabins Acted up with Rhym e and Dispatch, and Passengers requisites provided. CHAIRS— Appropriate fur Dirties, Dr a wi ng Rooms, Bed Rooms, &c. CARPETS—Brussels" et the lien quality, ss. ed. per yard; SE perlor Kidderminster, Ss, id. and others equally low. LOOKINO GLASSES— From the inset magaifieeat to the smallest, for Maude% Mrs, sod Toilettes. CARVING and GILDING-4unit very beautiful' specimens for Csasol Tables, Gi&c. PAPER - HANGING and PAN TINI3-.-In the Richest as well as the Plainest Sella FUNIRALS—Attroded in the noon rupiafd amber, and par- 1 ticidar regard paid to Easeassy. EOM AGENCY—Hauges and Mateo registered far Letting or Disposal, without charge. SALES, APPRAISEMENTS, AND COLLECTION OF RRNT& FURNITURE WAREHOUSED. H. L C° °" ll , 93. Disneresaeweranew Wsrans, has the know of bring Eteptoyed and Patroclus, by some of the first Fatuities In the Irjagdont. FRIDAY EVENING, MARCH 2, 1827. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOPS OF LORDS, ',Weal/ I. Lords RIVERS, MINTO, DARTMOUTH, BOLINOBNOILS, and Bssionovon, took the oaths and their seats. Lord ROLLE presented Petitions from the parish of St. Stephen, in the city cf Exeter, from the parish of Great Torrington, and from ten other places in the county of Devon, against any farther concessions to the Roman Catholics. His Lordship also presented three similar Petitions from the county of Dorset. The LORD CHANCELLOR presented similar Pe titions from. Newcastle-under-Lyne, in the county of Stafford, and a parish in the county of Southampton. The Bishop of EXETER presented similar Petitions fro the Archdeacon and Clergy of the Archdeaconry !' of Exeter, and from the Clergy and Inhabitants of the pario of St. Paal, in the city of Exeter, aad from the linimeitants of the parish of Allhallows within the I saw •ffi Lord ROSSLYN presented Petitions, praying for the reinoval 'of Rumen Catholic disabilities, from the patish of St. Andrew, in the city of Dublin, and frOrn the pari.h of Bari yloughfoyle, in the county of Galway. Lord SPEN.:ER presented a similar Petition, signed by 570 of the Inhabitants of the town of Northampton. Lord MALMESBUItY presented Petitions against any alteration in the Corn Laws, from the Owners and Occupier s of Land in the Division of Wellingborough, in the County of Nwthampten; from the Owners and Occupiers of L.nd. in the Hundred of Mitiord, in the County of Norfolk; and from Banbury. in Oxforsfehlte. Lord GOWER presented a similar Petition from the Town of Newport, in the County of Salop. • Lord YARBOROUGH presented a Petition from the Mayor, Corporation, and 700 of the tradespeople of the City of Lincoln, praying au adequate protection for the landed, interest. The Noble .Lord also presented similar Petitions from. four different Districts in the neighbourhood of the City of Lincoln.:. 'Lord G W YDYIt presented similar Petitions from the Owners and Occupiers of Land residing in Cargill. is the Ccnnty of Perth. Lord MAYNARD presented a similar Petition from the Hundred of Ittinsnore, in the County of.Essez. Lord ROSSLYN presented a similar Petition from, Owners and Occupiers of .Land, in different Counties of England—from .Owners and Occupiers : of Land{ frequenting the Market of Romford, in the County of, Essex—from the Hundred of Threadsnell,• and from Bosmere . and Clayton, in the County of Suffolk-4ft= the labourers in the three Hundreds of Newport, in the County of Bucks—from the Hundred of Calmenk, in the County of Suffolk—and from the Palish of Sid bury, in the County of Devon. The Marquis of TWEEDALE presented Petitions to the same effect, from the Counties of Haddingtoa and East Lothian. - Lad DELAWARR resented sirMaar: Parisian' , from eight different places in the County of Susses. Lord BROWNLOW presented a similar Petition from the Hundred of Nees, in the County of Lincoln. Mr.Caatroa, from the Treasury.-presented an'account of Corn imported since the 26th of Jansuuy.--Adj. but in eonsequeme of the important question which was owning Do, he should pompous the presentation of the Petition to the fol lowing night. _ • _ TIIII CORN' LAWS. _ _ Mr. Secretary CANNING rose and moved that the House should resolve itself into a Committee of the whole House upon the Corn Laws. Sir Edward KNATCHBULL said he did not riseto oppose the motion, but before he consented, he wi►hed fully to understand that his so doing should not After wards be used as an argument that be was pledged to any of the resolutions proposed in the Committee, or to any measures founded upon them. The Hight Hon. Gentleman wofild not„he was sure, wish to place the House in such a situation. Mr. Secretary CANNING said he could not con ceive how the Hon. Geothiman, : or any one else could by possibility be considered pledged so any thing by this Mr. Stetting CANNING ruse and delivered him self to - tht folhiwing effect:— Mr. CHAIRMAN , --.BelOre I proceed to state the nature of the Re.oluticuss which it is my intention to lay berme the Committee, I trust they will permit me to detain them for a few moments while I express my ackno sledgments to the House for the indulgence which it has been pleased to bestow upon me. I .lo assure the House, that neither would that indulgence have been craved. nor should I have been disposed to air4il myself- of it, from any considerations personal to myself alone. lam perfectly sure that there are those into whose hands the opening of this question .might have been placed with much greater :dean., ge to the measures themselves, and to the House. But, Sir, under all the extraordinary circumstances which have surrounded this question ; much as it has been agitated, both within and out of this House; and great as has been the inflammation of men's minds in regard to it; it. was considered desirable that .when the propositions of the Government were brought fotward iu Parliament, they should be brought forward in that manner which -should make it be understood ost clearly that they were the propositions of the Government, and not of any party. I say this the more readily in the absence of my Right Hon. Friend, the President of the Board of Trade, because, even if , be were present, I should be compelled to add, that inl his bands the subject would have been better, if not mete amieutly considered ; it would have experien ced from him the advantage of a superior acquaint. ance with its nature, which, in my hands, it must fail to receive. Sir, if these considerations were felt strongly at the beginning of the Session, when the first postponement of the question was propo sed, and kindly assented to by the House, undoubtedly they received great additional strength from that a faictins dispensa tion of Pnotrinhiree, VW rook of which we are still watehiog with eressistrag anxiety, and which depfived my Noble Friend (Letd - L;vespooly of an opportunity for opening the measure to the other House, simulta neously with the proposition I have now the honour to submit to this. He was deirous of taking that course, and of vindicating himself for his share, or rather I should say, for that paternity—of the measure, which was truly his. I know that he felt more interested and anxious upon it than upon any other measure within my recollection; and that upon its succes; be was ready to stake aU that was distinguished and honour able in his situation. Sir, it is therefore not less as the representative of my Noble Friend, than as the organ of the Government in this House, that I am now bring ing forward the • propositions befogs the Committee. And I only hope that I shall be able to convey to the House of-Conslions the sense and spirit of his opinions, in whith I hayeentirely concurred; and to prove my self not an unfaithful expositor of the sentiments which, I derived from hyrn, and of the measure which in its creation and-form is essentially , his. Sir, along with the disqualifications which I admit as belonging to my self for opening this measure to the House, there are, perhaps, some negative qualifications to which I may lay claim; and particularly that, owing to accidental circumstances, in all the long discussions which the , subject has undergone in Parliament at various periods, it so happens that I have never taken any part. In the debates of 181.5, / was absent from illness. In 1822, it so happened, that front my contemplated re moval to a post in a distant part of the empire, I took little part in the proceedings of Parliament.— ' With the single exception of one clause, which my situ ' atiori, as representative for the town of Liverpool, re quired that I should watch over—l mean that clause , which gave the House so much trouble, and which was • known by the name of the Winding Clause—excepting ' in that instance. I took no share' in the discussion of 1822. Since that time the question has been but little agitated. In the course of the last Session I had to being forward some propositions respecting foreign corn, which met the unanimous concurrence of the House; but in the discussions upon which there was, by general consent, a complete abstinence from the merits of the larger question of the Corn Laos. In this I have had at least one advantage. I came to the consideration of the subject, and I pow come. to the discussions of these measures, without pledge, without prej.iclice, sa ith out having to maintain any tomer opinions for the sake of consiaricy, and without any feeling of inflammation or acrimony towards any party concerned in the discussion. Sir, it does indeed surprise me, that into this discussion any hostile feelings should enter. First, because I be lieve that the differences between those who differ at all, are infinitely less wide than they are generally stated to be. And, secondly. because amongst all the various opinions which exist on the different sides, I have never met yet either in all that I have read, or in all that I have beard on the subject,-1 have never found the extreme of either side manfully and unequi vocally supported. First, as to the introduction of foreign corn into this country, the extreme opinion on one side must go to a perpetual, unmitigated exclusion; whilst it is equally obvious that the extreme opinions on the other side must as surely lead to perpetual, un restricted importation. I have never met with any one, on the one hand or on the other, prepared to go the folk length of these propositions, unequivocally or with out qualifications. Then, Sir, all between these remote and extreme differences, ate questions of mode and de- s [PRICE SEVENPENCE: greet questions in the discu•sion of which, Gentleman are apt in the language used t • enforce their argumenes, to go beyond their real meaning, and to create the ap. pearance of irreconcilable hostility, where in reality it do-t not exist. I have never met the advocate for a fret tiade in corn who, when pressed in argument, would twt admit that to the agricultural interest some protection was due. I have never seen the most violent supporter of the opposite opinions willing to risk all the cane quences of a permanent andiellexiSle exclusion. Ois the one side, I find those who so loudly call for the im- I portation of foreign corn, admitting the principle that protection in some shape or other should be afforded to domestic agriculture. As to the amount or degree, that is the question at issue ; b u t t h at s o me i s dwell have never yet heard denied. On the other hand, those who press for prohibition or exclusion most strongly, all A!** their opinion; by admitting, that a power—in 11.111111inieomemkisesidlibminy beAr.-sbeTesid elver;ys reels% with the Parliament, or the Parliament not sitting, with the Executive, to come in to the aid of the country when any peculiar case of emergency shall require it. Why, then, here we have it admitted by the one party. that protection is not wholly to be abjured; and by the other, that unbending prohibition is impracticable.— Having, then. these admissions limp the widest oppo nents in the two classes of opinions, all the rest resolves itself into a question of mode and degree. The ques tion is, Sir, in what mode. and to what degree. shall protection to agriculture be extended ? In the course of the last two or three years, two or three different piano have been proposed for the settlement 'of 'this most important question. That of Mr. Ricardo was one; another originated with a Noble Lord, • Member of the other House of Parliament; a third, which has been more lately seen, and whickje : accordant with tie strict doctiines of the eeoi is familiar to every body conversant wigs the current literature of the day. Here, then, are three plans, de vised by persons most generally favourable to a free trade in cora, which, nevertheless, not only admit the principle of protection, but proceed to state the mode at•d degree in which, according their notions, protec- Sias o.jbt to be afforded. One of these plans, the first, =Zs a duty of twenty shillings per quarter on wheat I speak of duty, it is always in reference to *bear, because the duties on the other sorts of grain are regulated by that. This plan proposes a duty of twenty shillings, without reference to price; the duty to be diminished yearly one shilling until it shall have reached a maximum—that is a minimum in the scale, but a maximum of the ultimate duty of five or ten shillings, at which point it is to be made permanent.— The second plan, that of the Noble Lord, differed from the f one in this respect. It proposed to begin of duties at sixteen shillings, to. be gradually so ten s and that amount to be permanent. The last plan dinned from Both t inasmuch.as it pro posed a duty, once for all, of 'five or six shillings, equally, without reference to price, and to be perma nent; but with an admission of argument, not in state• ment—that in cases of extreme emergency and pressure, it ought to be left doubtful whether that duty should stand. Now, Sir, my objections to each of these three plans are theses Whenever the time of pressure comet. they will prove a delusion to the agriculturists, and leave them without substantial protection or relief. On the other band, in times of an .insufficient supply from our own soil, abets famine is its our streets, our workshops, and our manufactories; what will be said if the Government cume to levy a duty upon the im portation of foreign corn ? Either the Parliament, if sitting, would legislate, under the pressure of the ewer.. gency, to suspend the duty, or the Executive-Govern merit must exercise a 'power which unfortunately for them, the system lodged in their bands, and suspend the duty by violent and unconstitutional means; and seek their defence in an Act of Indemnity—(Hear, bear, hear). My objections, therefore, to this system is, that it does not answer the purpose. It admits the prin ciple of protecting, but does not carry it into effect. On the other hand, what is the qualifi cation of those who contend for perpetual prohi bition, with a power of mitigation re.erved In the Par liament or the Government What sort of security have we that the mitigation which they offer, will be either expedient or effectual ? I say, absolutely nothing. They appeal from legislation to discretion. They would leave the opening of the ports in times of emer gency to the Executive. They would throw upon the Government the responsibility of suspending that pro hibitive duty which they now say ought not to be sus ' fended. From this I bring myself to the practical questions—What is the degree of protection required, and do the laws as they exist afford that precise degree of protection in the best mode, or do they affad pro- tectiou to an unnecessary extent? Sir, the law of 1815, I introduced for the firtt time into the Legislation of tbis country upon corn, the principle of absolute prohibi tion—(Some Hon; Members dissented). I say the pi in ciple was here introduced for the first time. I am not misinformed that antiquarian lore bas supplied an Act of Edward IV. by wh cb an unqualified prohibition was enacted. Some three centuries and a half distant from the present time, a law was passed, providing as fol. lows:—When wheat reached a certain ;nice ail impor tation was prohibited. And this did not extend to fo reign corn alore ; but wheat grown in one part of England, could not be sold at another, it it fetched a different price. I cite this law, because when I say, that in 1815 the principle of prohibition was first introduced into the Logislatim of this country, I know that I am liable to conti adi _Lion upon the authority of this Act; bu. when I cite this law, I do not arprehend that it will be neces sary for me to say very notch as to its character. I say then, that in the year 1815 the principle of prohibition was first adopted; and when it was so adopted, it was attempted to be qualified by a union with the opposite principle of unrestricted importation. I do not mean to cast any reproach upon the proceedings of that time ; the same consideration had not then been given to the principles upon which these questions rest. I do sot mean to say, that if I had taken part in those discus sions, I should have been wiser than others iu foreseeing the difficulties which have since amen. But looking back and calmly tcfieeting upon t h u e meatuses, it MOUSE OF COMMONS. [Long before the gallery was opened for strangers, the avenues and lobbies leading to it were filled wkh Gentleness iikskrus to obtain admission. Notwithstaading they were tell, that no one could be permitted to enter the gallery until the ballet, for the Stirling Election was concluded, and which wont Mee: most probably, take place until near Ste they perdsll4-114 maintaining their situations, and In one of Ilse stake's'. lesanse u lie a Conunittee.room, it became necessary to call in the aid et 11& Lee, the High Cantabile, to exercise his authority. Tee eselleine that the doors were opened, about a quarter before five Abel e the crush into the geblery was excessive, considering the extreeMig Valid "ace at the bottom of the staircase ; and in a few minutia the gallery was crowded to antis, not even leaving the seats de. stilled for the Reporters unoccupied. When the latter entered. considerable difficulty was experienced by them in obtaining their mats, and in eaplainiug to those who bad thus improperly ob. traded themselves, not a little confusion prevailed. So great WO the noise in the gallery, that the Speaker more than ogee rises obliged to call to order, and announced that "strangers mast with. draw." The latter coentnand was not, however entorced. It was scaly by tie assistance of a large body of constables that the Mew bets were able to make their way from Palace-yard, through the passages to the Lobby of the House. Under the gallery is, by the courtesy of the House, set apart for Peers !Ad Members and Peers' Seas; and amongst the Peers thus accommodated under the gallery and below the bar, were the Earl of Harrowby, the Mar quis of Lanadown, he. Indeed, so crowded was this place, that several Peers were obliged to have accommodation extend ed to them at the lower end of the Members' galleries ' and next to the Strangers' gallery, where the Private Clerks of she House are usually allowed to sit. Amongst the Peers so seated were the Marquis of Queensberry, Lord Kensing ton, ice.. Mr. Secretary Canning en tered the House about six o clock, and at show half past six o clock he brought forward his resolutions. He seemed to enjoy his accus tomed health, but obviously *peke in the most cautious manner. carefully abstaining from any elevation of voice, or violence of ac tion; indeed, anxiously excluding all rhetorical flourishes or orato rical display that might have warmed him into something more than calm and level exertion ; notwithstanding such cue, however, the perspiration on has countenance skewed that indispositioniati left considerable weakness. He did sue even read his own Rao lotions, a course, requited to be purseed by the Mover, previous to their being pet from the Chair; but he left them to be read by the Chairman. As semi as Mr. Canning had coacluded his speck many of the City folks rushed oat of the gallery and the lobbies, as - as they had befogs hurried in.] . . After some private 1411 s bad paned through afferent stew, ' Mr. Henn brought up the following lint of Members cheese this day to decide upon the merits of the Petition against the mesa for Stirling: The Hon. Win. Geed's, William Bickford, Ras. sir Charles Forbes, Bart. the Hun. G. Howard. Lord Heger Cholmley, William Cartwright, Fag. E. Bootle Wilbraham. Bev lion. J. Abeicromby, and Sir George Clerk. A vast number of Petitions from various parts of the Kingdom, on the subject of the Corn Laws, were presented; but in conic ' quince of the noise nod confusion which prevailed, it was impos sible in the satiety to distinguish the names of the places from whence the Petitions came, and in many instances, even the names et the, Members presenting them, were not heard. The same ob servation will apply to Petitions presented respecting the claims of the Catholics froth districts and towns in Ireland; but these red dens were not as numerous as the former. Mr. VILLIERS STUART gave notice that the motion which steed for yesterday, and which was dropped on account of there being nu Hesse, would be brought forward by bins so Tuesday nest. The Hosetitable Member's motion is, to move for papers connected with the appointment of a resident Stipenliary Ma gistrate, wader the Constabulary Act, for the district of ILO =Baba waft Mr. MABERLY presented a Petition from the inhabitants of Abingdon, praying Ix relief from taadtion.—Ordered to be printed. iiir GEORGIC CLIME presented Petitions tram the mer amens of Edinbergli. the Corporation, and others, praying for a re vision of the Corn Laws.—Laid on the table. Mr. PLUNKATT said that it was his intention to have pro moted a Padden that sight from the Roman Catholic Prelates of Ireland, complahliog of the grievances under which they laboured, : 1 1, , - .. 7 1. , 1 i . '4 l. 1 ' • 4 ' ( . - .. 1 ' .. 0 f 3 I , : ) t T 1 , li I 1 , . 1 , -1 1 .' 1 . ~I 1 A