Star. — London, England, 1829-07-25 00:00:00

; request were ordered out of Court. Mr. Platt opened the pleadings. The defendant pleaded not guilty. The Attorney-General, for the prosecution, said, that the defendant, Susannah Scott, was charged with the crime of wilful and corrupt perjury. The circumstances out of which the prosecution arose had unfortunately oc cupied too much of the public attention already, and he therefore would not now go more into the details than was necessary for the proper understanding of the evi dence which was to be offered in support of the prosecu tion. It was probably known to the Jury that Mr. Wel lesley was engaged in a suit with the Duke of Beaufort and others respecting the right to the controul of his children, and one would have thought that it would not be material to the public which party succeeded. In the course of that suit numerous affidavits had been filed, and in these the defendant made a very con spicuous figure. She and others connected with her made affidavits containing allegations deeply affecting the character of a lady, known then as Mrs. !High, now Mrs. Wellesley. After that cause was determined, it appeared that Mrs. Scott, who had been at one time a servant of Mrs. Bligh's, went to Paris and lived there with a person named Pedley. It appeared also, that subsequently to that •period, Mr. Wellesley received an anonymous letter from Paris, telling him that very important information might be obtained as to the manner in which the evidence was got up, in the cause in the Court of Chancery against him. At first Mr. Wellesley took no notice of this letter., There was no signature to it, but it stated that an answer intended for the writer of it would be received, if ad dressed to a particular place in Paris. After some con sideration, Mr. Wellesley wrote to Paris to say that he could not act in any manner, or hold any further inter course with parties who would not avow their names. The result was, that Pedley wrote to Mr. Wellesley, informing him that he was the author of the original letter, and pro mising to bring Susannah Scott to London, in order to sub stantiate the fact alluded to in it. As soon as Mr. Welles ley ascertained that those were the persons who offered to give him the information, he determined not to see them, himself, and not to allow any of his servants to come in contact with them, except a foreigner, who had char.* of the hall-door. It happened that when Pedley and the defendant arrived in town, Mr. Wellesley was confined to his bell by illness; and he gave directions to the foreign servant, that when Pedley and Mrs. Scott came to the house they should be shown into a room, and that no one should see them but Mr. Powell, his solicitor, a gentleman well known to the profession, and possessing as high a character for honour as any other in it. Pedley and Scott called at Mr. Wellesley's house, in Baker-street, in Fehreary, 1828, Me. Wellesley being at the time at tended by a medical gentleman, who was to be called as a witness to-day, and who would satisfy the jury that Mr. Wellesley was so ill as not to be able to go more than a few paces front his room. Pedley and Scott, on ar riving, were shown by the valet into the library, and were supplied with wine and biscuits, the valet cau tiously guarding the door until they departed at four o'clock. They returned again at eight, and saw Mr. Powell. Mrs. Scott detailed to him circumstances of a most extraordinary nature, and such as would repel some charges which had sunk deep in the public mind. The communication made by Mrs. Scott was truly extraordinary, and tended to implicate Mr. Nixon, clerk to the solicitors engaged against Mr. Wellesley. She stated, indeed, what would require very strong evidence to make any man believe. She assured Mr. Powell that she had been solicited to make affidavits, and that many of the facts contained in them were untrue.. She was induced to do so, she said, partly by money, and partly by other means of persuasion, and she was urged to get others to join her. She said that she had been travelling through the country with Nixon, that she had had illicit intercourse with him, and that she slept with hint at Dartford, Leatherhead, and Henley on Thames, and other places. The whole disclosure ap peared so extraordinary to Mr. Powell, that he thought it would not be right for him to receive it alone. He wished that other persons might be witnesses to so sin gular a communication, and applied to Mr. Whitelock, solicitor, and his clerk, for that purpose. To these gen tlemen she repeated her story, and specified times, places, and persons, in corroboration of every part of it. Her statement, as taken at the time in writing, was now in Court. One of the gentlemen remarked to her that it was quite impossible. "Do you mean to say (he asked) that the persona who saw you at the different places with Nixon could identify you ?" She assured them that they could; that there could be no difficulty on the point ; that Nixon had a particular bump on his forehead which could not fail to attract the notice of those who saw him. She then proposed to go round to the different places where she had been with Nixon for the purpose of being identified. It was her own suggestion, and to have adopted it showed a very proper caution on the part of Mr. Powell. He and the two other gentlemen thought that it would be unsafe to advise any proceeding on so extraordinary a statement as that of Mrs. Scott. She accordingly proceeded to Leatherhead, Henley-on- Thames, Walthamford, Oxford, and other places, accom panied by Pedley and Mr. Whitelock's clerk, and it turned out, as she anticipated, that she was recog nised, and that Nixon was described as having been with her. A circumstance occurred, too, which strongly cor roborated her account. In one of their excursions toWal thamford the one-horse chaise in which Mrs. Scott and Mr. Nixon were,lbroke down near the house of a Mr. Clarke, a miller, from whom they received shelter; he sent them fer n and in his own chaise; she stated they had dined with Mr. Clarke, that Nixon gave him his card, and assured hint he would be very glad to have the pleasure of his company whenever he came up to London. Mrs. Scott was in troduced as the wife of Mr. Nixon, and it occurred to her that it was a very imprudent step on his part to give his address to Mr. Clarke. " When be calls on you in town," said she, " he will find that you are a married . man, but he will discover that I am not your wife ; go, tlasn, and get back your card." He did get it back, by telling Mr-Clarke that he was about to leave his lodgings, snd that probably before that gentleman came to town he would have removed to a new residence; under these cir cumstances he preferred giving his address at the office of the solicitors, whose clerk he was. After this informs tinn was given, and they had received from Colonel Paterson a sum sufficient to defray the expenses incurred Pedley and' Mrs. Scott, Colonel Paterson gave Ped ley 1001. more. Mr.Wellaeley declined from the begin ning having any , communication with them, and the whole responsibility devolved on Colonel Paterson. .Mrs. Scott almost immediately disappeared from London, and Mr. Wellesley new felt persuaded that . &aro. war,. Immo l'orratpt motive at the bottom, that Abere•-was acme con spirecy on foot, in which she vac sir aigent. ?dn. .r_ _.,.~._,..,: ~, ' 11110 4 IC 111 _ LLIGENCE. 4 1 . .07 'S' t BENCH, Jinx at. 1' st.friter-uivo V. SCOTT. This Aso lilitiireciiition instituted against Susannah Scott, fei'-wilfui and corrupt perjury. At the request of the Common Sergeant the witnesses S cott afterwards appeared in London to support an action brought by Pedley against Mr. Wellesley. The plaintiff was nonsuited, Mr. Wellesley's defence being, that he "was not liable to any such demand as that sought to be .recovered in the action. It would be remembered that she did not see Mr. Wellesley when she called at his house ; yet, Mrs. Scott declared, on the trial of the action, that when she arrived at the house of Mr. W. in Baker-street, and after the servant brought her into the parlour, both she and Pedley saw Mr. Wellesley, and that he promised her an annuity of 1501. and to defray all her :expenses if she would assist him in effecting the object 'which he had in view. This was the first ground of charging her with perjury. In support of this charge, the Attorney General said he would call Mr. Wellesley, the physician who attended him at the time, and the servant. The next assignment of perjury against the defendant was made upon that part of her evidence in which she stated that both Colonel Paterson and Mr. Powell promised her 1501. a year. Those gen tlemen would prove that no such promise was ever made ; but as she had not sworn that either of them made the promise in the presence of the other, and as the two must have been present in order to support an assignment of perjury, the attorney-general felt that she might escape as far as that part of the charge was concerned. The next assignment of perjury was also founded on her testimony in. the action against Mr. Wellesley ; she was examined as to her credit, with the view of showing that she was an infamous woman, and she ventured to swear that idle had not the slightest idea whyshe was taken from place to place when she went round to be identified ; she knew, she said, when her examination at the trial was taking place, what the purpose of her journey was, but she solemnly swore that she had not the remotest suspicion of it when she started with Pedley and Mr. Whitelock's clerk : on that swearing of her's perjury was assigned ; and it would be proved, by three respectable witnesses, that she did know why she was going, that she went upon her own sugges tion, and that she actually pointed out the places where she could be identified : in instituting the present prose cution Mr. Wellesley disclaimed all personal considera tions, and merely wished to hand over this woman to the justice of her country ; what her motives for giving the information and then suddenly disappearing, were, he could not pretend to divine ; he was unable to say whe ther she wished to point out a course of inquiry, which. if followed up, would expose the mode in which evidence was got up against him, or whether she wished to involve him in fresh trouble by means of false representations ? It might naturally be asked why she was not indicted for the falsehoods which she admitted were contained in her affi davits in the Court of Chancery ? the reason was—she made it on condition that no charge of perjury should be made on account of any thing put forth in these affidavits. After some further remarks as to the nature of the case to be disclosed in the evidence, the following witnesses were examined : The record of the cause in the Common Pleas between Pedley and Mr. Wellesley was produced, and given in evidence. It appeared that the plaintiff was nonsuited. Mr. Franklin and Mr. Fraser, short-hand writers, read their notes of the evidence of Mrs. Scott on the trial of the action.—Mr. Wellesley was the first witness. Examined by Mr. Brougham—l am the prosecutor of this indictment. In February 1828, I received an ano nymous letter from Paris, which I answered, and the re sult of which was that a Mr. Pedley came to me, and it was arranged that Mrs. Scott was to come to my house. She came on the 21st of February, but I gave directions that she should be kept in the dining-room, and that I should not see her. That was on the evening of the 20th, or the day before her arrival. I had been ill for several days, and was confined to my room on the 21st. The dining-room is on the ground-fluor, and the room I was confined in was on the second floor. I was not confined beyond eight o'clock in the evening of that day, till which hour I was in bed. I was attended by Dr. Arnett; during no part of that day did I see the defendant Scott ; I positively say I never had any conversation with her in my life ; once before and twenty minutes ago she was pointed out to me, and, excepting these times, I have no hesitation in saying I never saw her in my life ; I do not know whether it was before or after the 21st of February the first time ; she was then pointed out by Mr. Powell ; .she was walking in Lincoln's Inn-square, and I was in Mr. Powell's chambers ; twenty minutes ago I was walking with Dr. Amott, and people near me said, " there's Mrs. Scott ;" I never gave her papers to take to Mr. Powell, or promised her an annuity. Cross-examined by Mr. Denman—l was not at the Court of Common Pleas when the trial took place, Ped , ley v. Wellesley ; I was not out of my house till the trial was over. It was brought against me for expenses; he was nonsuited, and sent to prison for the costs. His discharge under the Insolvent Act was opposed by my direction ; I directed Mr. Whitelock to take the proper steps. My defence on that action was, that Colonel Paterson had employed him ; he did not employ him by my direction, but with my knowledge certainly. I pre sume what was paid to him came ultimately out of my pocket ; I don't think more than one cheque was drawn, and that for 301. ; Mrs. W. asked me for it. I ascer tained that it was for Colonel Paterson afterwards, to pay Pedley, and I said I would not pay his expenses. Col. Paterson was not in the room when I gave the cheque. It was proposed he should sleep at my house, but 1 said I would have nothing to do with him; and I told Col. Paterson that after what had passed with his daughter I would make any sacrifice to expose the truth. it was only arranged that he should not sleep at my house. He did sleep at Colonel Paterson's house. The rent of the lodgings iu Crawford -street, for Mrs. Scott and Mr. Pedley, was paid out of my pocket ; but I gave no directions before or after respecting any of the ar rangements. I of course know what affidavits Mrs. Scott had made in Chancery respecting me, at the same time Pedley came to my house. Most positively I declare that I had no intention of producing contradictory affidavits from Mrs. Scott, for I know enough of the history of my country to know that they would be of no avail. The matter was discussed between Mr. Powell and me ; and on my oath I swear I declared over and over again I would not avail myself of any oath from tho persons who had sworn against mo. I said they might confess their falsehood if they chose, but I would have no affi davits from them. I know a man called O'Meara, whom I discharged from my service for peculation. He after wards sent me a letter to ask for a character, which I refused to open, and sent back. The Attorney-General—Perhaps Mr. Common Ser.' geaut will produce the letter ? Mr. DeumanNo. It was not opened. Cross-examination resumed—To ,the best of my know ledge, I never asked him to remain in my service at the Hague in 1824, but to leave me without a servant. I employed Pedley and one of my servants to go to. Parii to: get-papers. . thosennut 50!.. for the liMpeasca. Generally speaking, lam a late riser. On , the 21st of February I . dined in the drawing-room, after I got up:.at eight in the evening. ..On Ahe.day. Mrs. Scott. auto,_ I was not in the dining-room ; nextoilay , I >ills'', sense people to dinner, and I believe I did not get up till I _. w-~ -- s-.. . . inner time; Dr. Arnett attended me frequently ; he is not only my physician, but my personal friend. I never saw Mrs. Scott and Pedley together any where. I have not been before any Grand Jury upon any in dictment except this. I gave no directions for indict ing her for a conspiracy. I employed Ruthven to go to Brussels for her attendance here. Ruthven was em ployed by me upon many things, and I don't know how much he had for this business. I don't think he had any money till he came back ; but I am careless about money matters, and cannot remember any specific sum, with re ference to any particular business, unless my recollection is strongly drawn to it. Re-examined by Sir J. Scarlett—My reasons for not wishing to see Mrs. Scott were, that I should enter into no contract or liability with her. Auguste Guilleau—l am in Mr. Wellesley's service ; I received instructions from Mrs. Bligh, on the 21st of February, to receive Mrs. Scott and Pedlev, and keep them in the parlour without seeing any bo dy till she came ; I obeyed my instructions, and gave them instruc tions. Mr. Wellesley was in bed all that day ; I re mained in the back parlour till Mrs. Bligh came, and then I went up to Mr. Wellesley, to tell him Mrs. Scott had come ; I afterwards carried him up some tea; I do not think I let them out ; I went into the parlour at six in the evening, and they were gone then. My master came down about half-past seven, and I think he dined in the drawing-room ; I am sure he did not see Mrs. Scott; he did not dress, but carne down in his dressing gown. Cross-examined by Mr. Brodrick I can't recollect *the day of the month ; I don't recollect having ever said it was the 22d or 23d. The room I was in was next the dining-room, and the door was open. I never left the room till Mrs. Bligh came except for a few minutes, to get a bottle of wine for Mrs. Scott. I went to Paris to get papers from O'Meara, which I did not get. Mr. Wellesley sent me ; but Pedley received his instructions from Mrs. Bligh. Re-examined by Sir J. Scarlett—ln the room where I sat I could see the stairs, and must have seen any one come down, and have heard it too. Dr. Arnott—l visited Mr. 'Wellesley, in February, 1828, every second or third day in the beginning of the mouth, and I find by my books I visited him every day from the 18th to the 22d, and then not again till the 27th. I cannot recollect how he was particularly on the 21st, but I am stare he was in his bed-mom from the 18th to the 22d. My usual time of calling was between two and five, and I conclude it was at that time I called on the 21st. Cross-examined by Mr. Denman—The witness then banded in his diary for the 21st February, in which Mr. Wellesley's name was written. Hu could not swear to his having ♦isited Mr. W. on that day, but no doubt he had. Mr. Powell—l saw Mrs. Scott on the '22d February, 1828, in Baker-street ; Mrs. Long Wellesley and Col. Paterson were present, also I believe Mr. Pedley, who then went by the name of Roberts, but not Mr. Wel lesley. I saw hor afterwards at Col. Paterson's, where I had a very long conversation, and took down in writing the substance of what passed in her presence ; I read it over to her distinctly, and she signed it. She made no objection, but told me it was correct ; I saw her at Mr. Whitelock's on the 25th; 1 there made a second memo randum of what she said in presence of Mr. Whitelock and his clerk, and she signed it, having heard it read. It was mostly taken down front her own mouth, by her own. dictation. Craw-examined by Mr. Denman—l promised her I nothing. She told me she was only anxious to repair the mischief she had done Mr. Wellesley by her affidavits in . Chancery. Mr. Wellesley was never present at these meetings. I was at Milan formerly, collecting evidence for a particular purpose. I acted under the advice of Mr. Brougham and Mr. Home in the steps I took with regard to Mrs. Scott. Be-examined by Sir J. Scarlett—Mrs. Soon was afraid' of being prosecuted by the Misses Long, and I promised' to protect her as far as I could. She afterwards refused, to come forward because Mr. Wellesley refused to give het money, and then she went away. The written statement was here put in and sread. —Wickham, clerk to Whitelock, stated, that when Mrs. Scott came to England she was desired to .make . certain statements, which she did make. _ The evidence for the prosecution haring closed— The Common Sergeant addressed the jury for the de fendant, and commented on the evidence in support of the assignments of peijury. It appeared by the evidence at the time, that Mrs. Scott saw Mr. Wellesley in the pre sence of Col. Paterson. If that were so, he might ask the jury what they thought of the prosecutor who did not call Col. Paterson to prove whether he (Mr. Wellesley) was present or not, giving directions ? Did he or not direc t . her to take papers to Mr. Powell ? Col. Paterson might have proved that point ; and as he did not appear, the second assignment of perjury was also dour away. The next question was whether Mrs. Scutt.knew why,she was taken to Henley ? Upon that point he should say the case was a gross instance of oppression and treachery. The woman came from Paris to show where certain witnesses were to be found. She saw Mr. Powell and Mr. Whitelock. Those persons met her, and gut her to sign papers- the signed under a solemn pledge that those papers were never to he used against her. It wa4 . said the pledge was conditional. Why was i% not in, writing? Why did those attornies act improperly with an ignorant woman ? Was that the mode in which aftornies ought to take depositions ? No. It might do in the inquisitorial Courts of Milan, but would put an end to justice in the Courts of England. The fact was, after all, that she was accused of going out of town with the attorney's .clerk, who took improper liberties. What . had her conduct to do with the question of shillings andpencebe tween Pedley.and Mr.Wellealey ? There werethree allege tions of perjury, and he did not consider either. proved. Who could, believe that this woman would take a journey from Paris, without she had been invited, to oblige Mr. Wellesley ? There was another strong feature iu the mute. Bow-street officers were sent to Brussels to take her into custody. They had no authority there, and nolcms rolens she was brought to England to be incarcerated.— The object was to get her conyicted,of perjury,. so . that the proceedings in Chancery respecting .Nlr. Wellesley's •childreu might stand on a rotten foundation. If that could have been done with justice, it would 11V1. been right.— It would have been necessary to remove the. stigma front the prosecutor, of haviug, by immorality and, miscon,, •duct, removed his children front a &titer's roof. - He might ask the Jury whether the witnesses hoard that day were not men likely to support any great . question . in which their own interest concerned ? Let then) lay their hands on their hearts, and say, whether Mrs: , Scott , waanot as much entitled to credit as some other ,parties ? ' But Mrs. Scott was only ,a speck in the great Irinie whicload ',Utak(' and overwhelmed the coentry ' for several years. He disnOseedthe cium,withe CPRMence sad contempt , for the charge, convinced- Oat- tbaJwt ,would say, in 'the exercise of:their solemn judgment, t.'. no sinwlo part Pt.tine gharga, hack heen. estalAished. t Lord Tenterden stated the charges contained in the in- _ r•: dictment, and left the Jury to say, whether the defead aat had wilfully and corruptly warn, first, that she sa w Wellesley on the 21st of February ; secondly, that did not know why she went to the country ; thirdly, Mr. Wellesley offered her 1001. If the jury believed, did so swear, they ought to find her guilty. They welt at the same time to consider that no person could be eel. victed of perjury on the evidence of a single witness, It any circumstances had occurred, favourable to the defend. ant, they ought to give her the benefit. The jury retired from the box, and having deliber ated a short time, found the defendant—Nut Guilty. The verdict appeared to give great satisfaction to tb a auditory. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION HOUSE FORATIT AT TUT BASK Of IbIOLAITIA— Yesterday Richard cd. ford was brought up frosts the Centime, on the charge of forged the name of an individual la the Dank books, in order 1 7, sell out a quantity of stock. The prisoner was taken on Thursday, in the Bank, attest/eh, to commit a second offence. Mr. Alderman Ansley attended for the Lord Mayor. Several gentlemen connected with the Bank of Ragland were to attendance, as well as Mr.Freshfield, the solicitor. The case of forgery. which was committed about three week, since by the prisoner. was gone into. ?dr. Linton gave his evidence relative to the sale of stock tad transfer by the prisoner, who represented himself to be the mar qf the stock. , *Adept evidence was, only gone into in order to warrant ar e . ' mend, and the prisoner was remanded accordingly. The prisoner appears to be rather older than is represented is some papers. He was remanded until next week. In order to giv e time to make full inquiries oa the subject of the offence committed by him, and also to ascertain if any other charges are against bin, Marten, the dicer, has discovered the prisoner's residence, bu t nothing material was found in Gifford'a apartments. GUILDHALL. Yesterday an ski man n;mriguiti --7. 7Bwas charged, before Mr. Alderman Ansley, with fracturing a square of glass. and doing other damage In the shop of Mr. Reeves, pawnbroker, Thursday evening Shields came into Mr. Reeves's shop, and offered silver watch to pawn, on which be demanded a sow. yelp. One of the skopmen examined the watch, and discovered it to be one of those known in the trade by the cognomen of "duffers," i. e. watches made up for the purpose of being pawned, and if the bolder succeeds in imposing on the pawnbroker, a Wag of frequent occurrence, he obtains twice or thrice the full value el the duffer. The shopman pressed.bis finger against the case, which yielded to the pressure like a bit of brown paper, when the ad man because so irritated at spoiling the duffer that he seized as ink-stand, and aimed a blow at the head of the offending party. Fortunately it missed his skull, and made its *ay through the window, splashing its sable contents over two silk umbrellas, and dotting the face of a young woman in its progress. The old man asserted the watch was a good one, and no duffer ; that it went in his pocket until distress obliged him to let it go to the pawnbrokers. This however was proved to be impossible, for, on examination, though It was capped and jewelkd, it was desalting of the more ne. cessary appendage of a chain. Mr. Reeves confined his claim to Ss. nd. the value of glass broken, which the old mats declaring his inability to pay, he was locked up till the same shall be forthcoming. WORSHIP-STREET. "alien Creed was charged with bigamy. A smart young countrywoman stated, that between three and four years ago she was married to the prisoner, ►ut about four mouths after marriage he left her, and sbe heard no more of him innately, when bearing that be was in London, and married again, sbe left Coventry, her native place, in search of him, and found him living with another wife. She produced the certificate of her marriage ; but hit. Henett told her that she being the lawful wife could not prosecute, and her evidence could not be received against him. Mr. Besets said he would let the case stand over till Monday. to give time for further evidence, and the prisoner might be admitted to ball. Tux CONVICTS CONWAY AND MARTELL'. —WI are happy to find that great menials are being made to save Oise unhappy youths front the scaffold. Conway is, is truth, quite boy, and It appears that he and Menai were drawn into die corn. mission of the offeeces of which they were convicted. by the arts of the approver Coombe. The facts which have transpired glace the order for their execution arrived at Newgate. it is to be hoped, will save them from an untimely death. It appears that Coombs. the witness upon whose evidence they were convicted. has been foe some years the sedpeer of youth to the commission of crime.— Besides, there was a sort of promise of mercy held out to liar telli before, or at the time when be made some communication to the prosecutors. There are other cirutunstances which, it Is to be hoped, will have t►eir due weight in a proper quarter ; and we trust his Majesty/win change the sentence treadmill to baniassiess. BIRTH. At Upper Wimp*le-street, the lady of the Rev. It. F. Faller, of .a SOIL MARRIED. This morning, Dr. John Warman. of Hainburgh. to Mid F.. Westley. of the Strand. At St. hisq's. Islington, Marks Trevor, Esq. of Gower-street, to Olivia, youngest daughter of E. Undo, Esq. of Canonbury. Middlesex. DIED. At Epsom, Captain Michael Halliday, aged 63. At Aberdeen, in the 117tb year of his age, Dr. Robert Hamilton, Professor of blatbeniatics at the Marischal College, of which be was during SU years a member, having previously been teu years a Rector of the Academy of Psrtb. NEWWITE AND LEADRNH A LL MARKETS. Jima It Beef... ...39 6d to 3s Sd Veal ... 4. Od to 4s *I Mutton ...Ss ad co 311 104 I Pork aa Od to 4. 4tl Lamb as id to 5s od PRICESor HAY axe STRAW YESTERDAY. sr. sawn' s. wsurscuarst. Hay 41 5. Oa to MOs 0.1 I Hay 31 los to 41 154 04 Closet 31 150 04 to 51 101 04 j Closet 41 Os to 41 1:•• .Straw 21 2s 0.1 to 21 5s 04 I Straw 21 Os to 21 ss 0.1 PRICE OF LEATHER. Best Dressing Hides Common Ditto Crop Hiles, 35 to 40Ibs for cutting Ditto 43 to 501bs 1 64 to Dlid Calf Skins, 36 to 40Ibs Ditto 50 to 701bs Ditto 70 to 80Ibs ... .. Small Seals, Greenland) . Tanned Horse Hides ... ... Spanish Horse Hides .... .......... PRICE o► TA I.LOW, SOA P tie. Town Tallow ... 4f sof Yellow Soap 70a 04 Yellow SIPA 6d plottled . Iltot 04 Matte ditto .. —1 01 Curd . —a (Al Soap ditto —s ud I Graves io, (hi aleltisig STUB ...... —s 04 Good Dregs _ 5. 01 Tallow lasported Irons St. Prtcribursb, 400 Casks. • PRICE OF HOPS, Jui.v NM POCIERTS. II&W PAO% .Kent 1354 to 13641 Kent 1154 to 1244 upsets 1 4 10 4 1 130 s to 140 s I Kases 1121 to 120 f.firobato Eine 1806 to IllOlSrconds. 1:0s to 1804 Old Duty laid at L 38.000. . • COAL MIARKI►T. JuLy !4. Ships at Market. Ships Sold. 5$ Neweahtle 31 SSI Sunderland 161 Prior. 24. 6d To 50. 61 241 661 to 344 tol COURSE OF li.Xe Amsterdam —.14 6i GF. Ditto at sight ...12 3 Rotterdam... 4 U 12 5i Antwerp Si li . antloagh 91 U 13 15 Altataa 2eU 13 13i Faris 3day*.saight es 65 ditto ...2 U 23 102 Madrid ...36 Cadiz ...36i Ithrcelotta fialboa lIANGH, leas' 24. Seville ....54i .. Leghorn 471 Genoa 7..1 Venice 474 Malta Naples Sy} Palermo 1191 pcs os I.i•bon . . 457 ltio Janeiro .. 114 Dublin Cork . . .. 1i PRIORS OF GOLD AN/1 SILVER. Foreign Goldin Bars 17. 9 Bar% standard 0 4 11* • . . l i uNiabed by )Rifis NOP', at t b e *T " Oimcc, No.l, rickemplace. teitipk Bar. da ta Mr, t sh e that id * weft IVoMOk ripURTLE HATCHRT CADILLY. A W.deeday. and F of Tows or Cow A MARRIE AIL Tutor to a Pop%) Imo his Hai be glad to fill a V 4 *hole Education o remind.—Lettets sad Loparols. Boo& forwed to bin i A NTI•CORI A A. inandsd for 1 as well as for Pain natural linpleasei Colour., is more Workman. . Manufactured b tames of Rune% Just published by TIEVEREUN .a... .. me Dim Ilse wee --- ellei 4. The NEW I " &sent'etre Her S. The KING'! maek's Revkited." 4. GRA N BY, S. STORIES') 6. TALES 01 1 &edm; HA." 7. STORIES Idesaty." Thre IMPOI Jun poillaid. 'TRAVELS 1 1827 8114 FRANZGAND, Engravings, price': " His volumes t Inspiritlbis not top 'pea the present si also the national hi Mt. bemire damn S. TRAVELS LESTINE, lb to 11.R.e.& Mr. Madden's detaiTreWeetioi *[tole civilised we tercet, are full, Uvi " One of the ■ that we have ever on . T HE B 0 C ma ft. A HISTOK .f I, land, (rani £129. By Taos. S. LIFE aid I fitncii Vic shripti. Edited I Vol. with Pones! • " A derghthE whisk must ewer Literary Gamtte 4 MEIIIOIRI Norway, Ohmura/ Emperor Napok pith a Dim:gutsy Liam Gamma Al Oiforti. Ho. IYt Primed for I COCKS so • orated motion the Nobi Inside and imps ()Omen, wit- are as Wading Sauce Kerne arc giieu titepreri•leiti e Minis! eorouied GrattiGi, Ste. piei Itading." It is presumed ballots . and ellen most tamiSes is rise most respiers or more in ever kiagdoin ; most J. CO Made in Tie alinve Sai flentkmia, as 11 iiisirf years in a ENRY'S be MOT Messrs. Tumigi blatrettimter. I droppers at 46 6 by their variou United binidin braved on die ey scup* ideal . may be ►ad, aut SPISIT Of VINICI dikiteueprepara LEAK E'S euriii,,ii Oiii eitalr Poi recovery. Ncitl evitiell4nt diati Or to lel, u it efitY yeitn; vipel vitl tdcrct a Cul whet nprOing. tfiti _ . _ or tiotli &ft, tbi pi4ritiot4, T. le*lon' ttbltri ontY 4 0 6 1 1 2, AV 1.4 tbetit (7.11ie tel DV4iiift lVO l Mai :4 1 4- f tki anl l "7. taiVgiit, 1 r