Star. — London, England, 1827-03-10 00:00:00

IN A' IMPERIAL PARLI aLENT. Wass • HOOSIk 9F *IRAN -411. "it Lord NHA DI movetier Ketone anhielpoillif rte Ehmi • end Lunt)? Wool imported into this ecallot ES a/ pa taiedhi World, end of all. Woollens exported hno this watery to ail parte Itoftint4.-.01400, CaelthearAnneillhirilehoori, prowled is Account of the timaisty of Mantifealsred Goods UM this country by RUMS. SIPCO 1814.-4 AM on the table. Vet LORD CHANCELLOR presented Petition from Sitting. bosepeand Milton, In the County of Knit; from Dawilda, is that tit Devon • and from Aibrighton , in Shropibire, gallon dm Catholic Oallna.—laid en the table. Lord MIDDLETON presented a Petition from the Lesdownem ItaldOrk aod.its vicinity, against any attendants the Corn Laws, on the table. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY presented a Petition from tilt Archdeacon and Clergy of the Deanery of Canterbury, against the Catholic Claims.—Laid on the table. Lord O W YDY R presented a Petition from the Landowners of it Pariah in Perthshire, against any alteration in the Corn Laws.— Laid on the table. Lord FA L MOUTH presented Petitions from nine Parishes In the County of Devon, against any alteration in the Corn Laws.— Laid oil the table. The Bishop of EXETER presented a Petition from three Pa lish's in the County of Devote against the Catholic Claims.—Laid to tie table. The Biaibp of CHESTER presented similar Petitions from the Naivety of Chichester. and from various Parishes in the County of Laid on the table. Viscount LORTON presented a Petition from a Pariah In West- Ineith against the Catholic Claims.—Laid on the table. Lord Tint NHA M presented a Petition from the landowners of Richmond, In Yorkshire, against any alteratioti in the Corn Laws. —Laid on the table, The Earl of KINGSTON pike:tested Petitions from Donouglt inore and several Patishes in du Ceinty of Cork, in favour of the Catholic Claims.—Laid on the table. Lord CLA RE presented a similar Petition front the Catholics of Groom.—Laid on the table. Lord KING presented Petitions from the Parish of Stepney. and the unemployed Artisans of Manchester, praying for au alteration Mate Corn Laws.—Laid on the table. Earl STANHOPE presented a Petition front the Inhabitants tit the town of Gloucester comphising of the grievances occa sioned by the Introduction of the Imperial Quarter.—Laid on the table. The Marquis of LA NSDOW N presented between thirty and forty Petitions for Emancipation, from the Catholics of Padihni In the City of Dublin; and in the following Counties:— Galway, Kerry, Dublin, Cork. King's County, Wicklow, Wane tick. Clare, biennium Queen's County, and from the Protoolont Xtimenters of the Parish of liallycleare, in the County of Amelia, lad those of the Borough of Cockermouth.—Laid on unstable. CATSOLIC Q 0 nTtow. The :Marquis of LANSDOWN, although he tole to make a motion which might be conaideted one of form only, thought that citcumstances justified him, both as to what was due to his own feelings and ho nour, and to the feelings and honour of other individual with whom he held communication with respect to the step which he was to take, in trespating on the indul gence of the House for a few moments, and asking the. serittus attention i f their Lordships. At the time when he had given the notice which stood for Thursday, the 18tH inst. it was his intention to offer a motion on the subject of the Petitions which he and other Noble Lords had presented in layout of the Catholic Claims. If be had been induced to abandon drat intention, he was anxious to state that it was with a mind perfectly un changed as to the expediency and necessity of consider. . ing that question, and as to the certainty that at no dis tant period their Lordships must come to its conside ration. He had thought it discreet not to allow any precipitate step on his part to have the possible effect of creating, or adding to the disastrous conviction in the minds of the Catholics, that a majority of both Houses of Parliament was determined to reject the consideration of their claims. He felt deeply what the effect of such a Conviction must be to oldie a step calculated to encrease its bitterness. Whether, after moving that the Order be discharged, is this, or in any other Session, he should think it his duty to make sproposition on . the subject, be was not prepited to disclose. Neither was he pre pa.ed to state whether the Petitioners would again come to their Lordships, as he had had no other com munication with them than that of receiving th.'ir Pe nsions. But he could not leave the subject without stating his firm conviction that, whether introduced by himself or by some other Peer, the subject must,.at no distant period, be once more pressed upon the House; but in whit shape and under what circumstance. he would not attempt to predict, or give himself the pain of conjecturing. Let their Lordships consider deeply in what a condition they left Ireland, on the admission of those Noble Lords thews-lees who were opposed to the proceedings which it bad been his intention to pro pose. If he had wanted arguments' to whew that the state of Ireland must be altered before peace and secu tity could revive in her bosom, he would have found nothing more convincing than in the statements of those Noble Lords. Was a state of society so distracted as they admitted it to be, one which might te expected to right itself without interference? Let not their Lord ' Mops tatter themselves that by a sma'l majority in this be the other House, distraction c' uld be allayed, or those feelings repressed, which had their source and principle inhuman nature. That state of society in Ireland arose vet of the state of the laws, as grass out of the land in consequence of the seed pot in it. L t not their Lordships Imagine that a vote could throw back a class increasing to sttegglth and rising in ingenuity, knowledge, and talent, or make it forego the advantages and rewards of lawful ambition. Let them not think that it could teach a grow les population to hear without a murmur that stamp degrada'ion fixed upon them by the existing laws, which made them a caste in society. He therefore be. sought their Lordships, collectively and individually, to pond r well the state of Ireland under existing circum stances. He declaied, in the sincerity of his heart, that if kfibuld be placed in the distressing situation of as sisting the Comic& of an ho.tile P• ewer against his country, ti e first prayer which he should offer to for tune would be; " give ine Ireland as she is --(Hear, hear.) with a great, increasing population—midi leaders whose road to fame and foitune is cast in a direction opposite to the interest of the State—with.a population ender the influence of a Clergy alienated, iejected by the State. and denounced by the. authorities of that State as faithless and not to be believed—a population deprived of those conducting' between the high and the lower classes, necessary to preserve by splendid actions, the streilgth and harmony of the whole." This was the - condition in which their Lordships left, or rather aban. armed Ireland—(Hear, hear, hear), When the time should come, and come it might, when they should be called upon to array the resources of the country in strength and power against the resources of ancther country, be it what it may ; let them recollect that they must array them against a State which has no such dis abilities; and that they must place in the front of their battles, persons conscious that they were stigm atized in a way that no other nation w a s. H e con pursue the subject further : but he would not permit himself to in dulge its all the melancholy reflections which arose.-- file had nor personal wish or regret• on the question, which will not bound up with the iutetests of the .m next be discharged, The mode. having ben put and Weed. te, The Earl of WINCHELSEA expressed his sincere regret that the Noble Marquis should have abandoned his intention of buinging the question before the House, because the more it was discussed, the more would t'►eir Lerdships be convinced that it was impossible to th.ow open the e joynient of all civil lights and high offices to men who professed the Roman Catholic religion, It wa,► impossible to allow them to legi.late for a Pro testant Church and nation, without abandoning all the principles and safeguards of the Constitution t yexhe telt some consolation when he 'effected on the strong language with which the Noble Ma►quis had declared that uninfluenced by any decision he would bring for ward the questi:,n-....- Here general cries of Order !" arose. Earl BATHURST called chi Noble Lord to order. The motion of the Noble Marquis had been put and disposed of, and there was now no question before the House. The Earl of WINCHELSEA trusted that the House would 'eseute him if his igitaance of forms had misled him; but he tapsted that he should be allowed .so express—' . ',Here the Noble Earl was again called to order. and sat down.l Marl Dar Mean laid on the table some !Rapers, which were understood to relate to the Administration of Justice iti the Coto- Hies.—Adjourned till Monday. HOUSE OF COMMONS. • ROTIINTILY RUCTION. lir JOHN WROTTESLEY brought up the Report from the Coventry Election Committee, which stated that theattting Mem bers were duly elected, sad that the Petition complaining at an =doe Mutton was not frivolous nor vexatious; that the opposition to the sane was not frivolous nor vexatious. The Report ano Hated, that the Committee b.d come to certain resolutions, which were read by the Hon. Member, stating that great outrages had taken place at the last Election for the City of Coventry, sod that the Mayor and other blagiArates bad bees culpably negligent of their duty in not suppressing the same. That it also appeared that serious outrages had formerly taken place at Eleetioos for the said City. which was under the jurisdiction of its own Corporation Magistrates, and the Committee therefore ree,mmentled that a Hill should be passed to give tit.: Magistrates of the County of Warwick concurrent jurisdiction in the said City. Sir Jowl Waorresizt gave notice that on Friday, the 4th of May, be would move that the said Resolutions be taken Into consideration. Ike Hoc. Baronet then brought up the minutes of evidence taken oat the Committee, which were laid un the table. PZEREN ELECTION. Mr. LEIGH RECK brought up the Report el the Committee Co the Powys Electioo, which declared that the present Members were duly eleeted.and that the Pctitiust complaining of the said Eke don was rot frivolous nor vexatious, and that the opposition to the said Pention was not frivolous our vexatious. The Report also stated, that grow bribery and est/option had been practi.ed at the said Section, but that 31r. Manumit, whose return had bees peti tioned against was net privy to the said bribery mod correptiom— Tbe Repots Moe stated, that Jabot Stanbory, VAG had be.. sum owned to give evidence on the said eiectieni bad aboduoded to avoid encoding and giving evithruce. Mr. LEIGH KICK moved that the Speakor do lane his war. rant for the appreheosiOo of the said John Sunbury. • The motion was agreed to, and the Speaker bmed Ma warrant accordingly. Mr. BING brought In a Bill for the Regulation of Watertown or the River Thames. Read a twat time and ordeted so be seal a second time. Mr. BROUGHAM presented • Petition frolic Mr. Jobs Bur ridge, praying that a remedy-he had discovered for the dty thc ip the Navy might be inquired into, Me. nitouoHA ti said, a Petition had been put into Mahan& to present to the Houle, from a naiive of Hammel, iisklast there, and applying to • sumer in which the Ileac had no jorisdiaion. He therefore would out present it, links@ informed by try Speaker, that the person had a right to petition the Home. The SPEAKER said, every subject had a right to petition Par• nattiest; but not a foreigner, unless on a subject with whisk the House could deal. The Petittun WAS out presented. Mr. BROUGH•3I ;assented a Askew from the Cotton. Spinners of Belfast, against the Dory on Coals; and a aiuular Petition from Winchelwa. Mr. BROUGHAM presented - a Petition from a perm° of the mune of Gtathr.e, praying a reward fur improvements be had made in the art of Guaging. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR gave notice. that as the 10th of May, he would propose a mea.ure toe separating prucredings an Qmocery from the Great Sea root LAWS. Sir N. COLTHURST presented a Petition front the City of Cork, praying for a system of Pour Laws in IrelaiTd. The Petition, he said, was agreed to at a Public sleeting, and excited a great sensation, in consequence of which Meetings were held in the several PWWISS of the City, each of which agreed to a Petition against the introduction ut Poor Laws into Ireland ; and in Ws opinion he concurred. Mr. JAMES GRATTAN said, he had brought in a Bill for the introduction of Poor Labs in Ireland, which was not sop: . ported by his countrymen at the time, and therefore be gave it up ; but his opinion on the subject had not changed, and he thought it one of the greatest importance, and he would not fail to press it on the attention of the Government, and the House. Me. MONCIC said, the introduction of Pour Laws into Ireland, was as muck an English Question as an Irish Qnestion, as till that measure was effected, this country would be inundated by Irish poet, reducing the English labourer to a state of wretchedness ap proaching their own ; besides which it cost English counties mach to send Irish poor back to their own country. It cost the county in which be lived 41,unti list year for that purpose. The pour laws were the only posasitsle means or suppressing mendicity, which effect they had produced in this country, and would produce in Ireland, if wieldy introduced. He trusted the Seisioos would not be allowed to pass over without an inquiry.into floe subject. Mr JOHN NEWPORT end, the introduction of poor Minim° Ireland would encourage idleness Lillis people. Mr. DA WSON Gild, poor laws in Ireland would be agreed evil; and there were no persons in that country capabkof administering such laws. Mr. MAURICE FITZGERALD said,if any additional mks ' routine ovoid be indicted on Ireland it was the poor Uwe. p l Mr. H. GRATTAN sdd, the state of the poor in the city of Dublin, from poverty and fever, was indescribable. The pole were actually perishing for want, notwitinitatidiot iliesnalids were lisp. ported by voluntary contributioas. General GASCOYNE said, one-third of the poor tee of Laver pool last year was incurred by sending home Irish poor. Sir H. PARNELL said, all attempts to relieve the poverty of tits people of Ireland by aids front Government had ungainly failed. H. said, what was wanted in Ireland was employment for the people, which crud& only be effected by the introduction of isapital, and that tumid only take place as a raineequence of equal law. The Petition were then all brought op and read. Mr. BRO WN LP W presented a Petition front the Chamber of Commerce in Newry for a Repeal of the Duty on Coals. Mr. HENRY MAXWELL presented a Patna' from the Sawyers of London against the use of Steam Machinery in sawing. He thought the taxes ought to be put oa property, instead of the labour of the country. Mr. HOSHOUSE said, some of the Petitioners were Ma coo stituents, and had applied to him to support their Petition, which he bad informed them was Impossible. They, however, stated, that sawing could be 11011 e by manual labour on cheaper terms than it was now done by machinery, and that subject, be thought, ought to be inquired into. Mr. HUM said, the object of the Petition was to came a tax on the use of machinery, whir* he was onalldeot , would thous( the distress of the ommtry. He hoped Government would institute an inquiry, which woali • itenvitme the Petitioners .aad others of their erroneous dais subjoa. Sir JOHN penumted a Petition from a place is Dombertanskim Me album* to emigrate. Mr. 111. 1 11Breseatall *Peed= imbibe 51dpWrights oI Souk pets to which they were extended, and :acre to ebentrience. GASCOINE was understood to sty, that be iroidd take td Mote for a Cdfitmlttet of Inqgirt on the subject of Bel dillingliVALACE asked, If the inquiries oldie prOposed Commit- Mow" to be cognised to the nipping" interests etclulively ? Viral G ASCOY N E said—Certainly. Mr. C. GRANT said, that there was no objection to produce the Orders in Council, as they might be h..d from the Csaette. The Petition was then read, and laid on the tabk. Mr. EDWARD DAVENPORT postponed his /notion to the 2.341 of May. Lord PA L M BRITON mowed the order of the day for the third reading of the Mutiny Bill. Mr. HMS, Lord MILTON, aid Sir JONI Nricroax, expressed wish that It should be postponed. Lord Passings)* agreed, and the third reading was postponed to Monday. CORN LAWS. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Order of the Day for goin . ; into Committee upon the Corn Trade Acts. The House having resolved itself into a Committee of the whole House, Mi. W. WHITMORE rose in putsuance of the no-, ace whiclit he had given, for the purpose of proposing marlin Resolutions - At an Amendment to those brought forward by the Rig'ht Hon. Secretary for Foreign Affairs. He implored the House to give to th s goes lion, so important to all, and one of life and death to sortie, the fullest discussion and the most ample consi deration. The country would nut be satisfied if any measure were hurried through the Hotta., without a fair investigation of all the bearings of the question, and a much more general discussion than it had ob tained yet. He was of opinion that by discussion alone could the ttue merits be ascertained, and the delusions which existed be dispelled. &fore he went into a statement of what were his views as to the measures which ought to be adopted, he would detain the House while he made a few observations upon the principle of prohibition. He Wished to do to, because although the, measures before the House were some improvement, yet the improvement was but small, inasmuch as t*.e principle of prohibition was connived by them. He would first refer to the principle of prohibition. He objected to that principle, because he was convinced that it would tend to cause . great fluctuati n in prices. In proportion as we raised the price of coin heie, we lowered it abroad ; the only way in which we could hope to equalize the price was, by allowing impor tation. He need hardly point out the effect of fluctuation it was admiued to be most injurious to the farmer. For instance, when the price of Cirri was high for three or four years, the farmer did`not, in consequence, reap a greater profi., his outlay being aug mented by the contingent expenses on the growth of Corn, such as a conseqitent higher rate of wages, etc. If then the price of Corn should suddenly fall, it did not follow that the farmer's expenditure was imme diately reduced, and hence followed that extent of dis tress which had .been so loudly complained of. In the years 1817 sod 1818, Corn Leached a very high price; in 1821 and . 1822 it was as remarkably low. This had' been attributed to the importation of foreign Corn dining theshigh prices; islet he questi. ned whether the importation. was the cause of the change. It was, how ever doubtless;coricurrent. It conic{ nut be supposed that 1,500,000 qrs. of Corn could be admitted without pro ducing some effect : but it ought also to be recollected that in 1820, the harvest was particularly productive. It was clear, then, that prohibition would have the effect of raising Corn to an artificial price, and the consequent fluctuations would be productive of much mischief.. On these grbunds he objected to any principle of prohibition. To refer to another part of the subject, what would be the effect produced by rais ing the price of Corn in this country? Was it possible that a State depending, like ours, on its employment of capital, could continue to flourish if they introduced a principle restricting that employment ? Cm tainly not. The ic.ult would be, that if capital could not be pro-. fitably applied in this country, it would disappear.— He called their attention its-this particularly. If you raised the price of tore.hem ot you depressed it abroad ; 1 if you allowed the insportaiiewbf foreign corn, prices would find a level of 55a:or labs. at present foreign corn not being more than 20s. or 255. there was a dif ference between that price and the price of English produce, amounting to 'about 355. Now was not that offering a high premium to the introduction of capital abroad, where it could be applied with so much, greater advantage?—(H ear , h ear , h ear .) Thi s result might be delayed by our machinery, and by that natst: tural affection which men entertain for the soil that; gave them birth ; but a state of things might iski- , mately be expected, totally different from that whence we had derived our boasted superiority. Adam Smith had , said, that if we raised the price of labour compared with other countries, we enabled them to beat, us in the price of their produce; and he instanced the. fallen state of Holltand arwholly attributable to that sort of policy, in support of AU Opinioa. *ripple -fact was, such a course reclined the cooutry incapable of affording a higher rate of interest on capital than three per cent. while foreignets *were able to give ten per cent. Capital would then leaire the country, as it had recently left England, in various ways.-..in foreign loans, and speculations not conducive to the country"' interests. This was not a question of Whether a little more profit should be given to the agriculturist or to the manufacturer ? but it was a question in which the wealth of the country was involved. What vrotil,l be the effect on land, if the country lost its capital ? As had been the case in Poland and Germany, wealth would be wanted to purchase our produce. The principle of prohibition was carried to a considerable extent in the laws now proposed.— It was difficult to see all the evils consequent on a new law ; but he thought he saw sortie that pro. mised to be of considerable magnitude. It was pro posed, that if the supply was not equal to the con sumption, above 60,. a falling' duty was to be com menced. Was it then to be supposed that holders of tanheootduebesi;gt theyt the induced wwe t ee o ka keepliyd ssavey s c t e o ma n % o f gr ea t back, taak b e mineg i Itasca amount f a r . corn, when they l earnt t h ere was a deficiency, would e ae e duty?twha t i t e e n hy e . tionable; in reference to this view of the subject, if would render fraud more easy. Under the present law, it fraud were attempted, there was time for its detection, and he believed it had more than once been corrected ; but the regul a ti on o f wee k ly Averages would favour' ~~.. •N ' c . ... . • . p 6 I re. ifirsotibrienh was that those wbo had t . iluelds.• fries Dysart, tit* Laiien et Cul faileides sad (teat tiarmselven the terry re4amidbiliif of sse OM 11:111"11Pmth' for 1 fi " t " ii* e!! 4 " - .11110W1ILOW presented a nodose li mo s the. MAW' et hopis and desires Of as oppiilssed populgtion, gbt be Arm e d ., tu „ rdtec. , , a tho r ki i r . I . ad ,„ . esublsd Mt suggest such measures Is might restore the lie, BANILES a talkies frees the Ownerland Dan- ' tranquillity which they lidakitted was gone, and allay pierrW land in "on hat prellistietter Agrielliturv. .. the passions of which they proclaimed the fierce elk. Me t UIOH ,ta a remise (rem me Owstris et v tense. His only regret was, that they had not stated aitippleg ß"l"ll"ist e, ll in the e l preseed QV a r P" t ►t ies for preseeidee to the lateens:, the Male Has. Gent. the the means by which this great; end could be attained. eke Presidsm or / sts tlie Bawd et Trade, would lat biters the House , 1 He should now mere that the Order fixed for Thursday Coyle. riCthe hi Cowell respecting the Reelprothy Duties: nett he disehntered. the ports to *Wit Mel were extended, and the times at which' fraudulent Pratticet, 4 rieventing the dimly detection. 1f'600,000 quartets * hood, and a conspiracy suer armed rice of corn 51;a quarter—say frtll66os.r. pietist might derive the inoimous profit o. U the price dery raised 10s. the profit wearly double. Was not this holding I dangerous temptation? He thought a MIA the Mee reached 60s. wiluld be far the rate of duty proposed. He should section should be given up to 555. that . 20s. should be attached to that price instead kW that the duty should decline 2s. for - ef is. in the price, until it Came up to as.. to 63, there should be a fixed duty bethought would give a Mort tegular price; of what would be the effect of lmportiti. jesiified by experience. Prom 1770 to 1"" age prier was 45.. From 1773 to 1 . Tesde e as free, at least with the et.teptisa said he defied any body to drew that ' an import amnuoting to more than 600,000 From 1793 so 1805 the import wa s asaloon mad the ;nice was 60,. F, we') 1800 to 189 pest was 580,000 quarters; the mice under was justified in arguing. then, that - of 101.• on 55, the imptots won!, the amount tuelitioned. The idea of , mat of cultivation was absurd. Wheat . could not be imported - , freightage included, add to this 7'. fur insurance; and other • panes, and the importation price would equally absurd to suppose that we might Continenal supply being suddenly cutoff. B inaparte was at the acme of his unrivalled laige importation of corn took pl ce inn f.om France, from Flanders, and from H that year no less than 225,721 quarters imported . from France, 167,153 quarters derv, and 189,006 quarters f r om H.,111 a t otal of 581,880 quarters, from those tries, which were peculiarly under France, at the very time Bonaparte was of preventing England from receiving any them. It was therefore evident that no exercise could deprive this country from being supplif Continental COMM! ies as long as tee possessed paying for such supply; and it appeared r possible to give a more foltible practical than he had done to prove the truth and his position. The subject was at all times and he would not intrude much longer AS it appeared but little inclined to coi.sider further sit that moment. But he c..u1.1 i ploring the Agricultural Interest to reflsct they required a protection which war for them, and which, would evidently to the rest of the community. If they 1 wand an immoderate—a duty which in . to exclusion—instead of concord and friendliness ing between the great interests of the would be nothing but discord and schism—(i He implored the supporters of the Ae-' wrest to remember that at present it the estimation of the country • in general should an unjust protection be insisted on, felt the considepation and esteem of the of the comnsibity. He called upon the therefore, to support him in the plan wh• plained to the House, for in its operas prove beneficial both to the h gher and classes; and• be should conclude: by amendment to the Resolution betose the instead of the words 0 whenever the I . male up surd publishe d in the manner required be 60s. and under 61s. the quarter, the - for every quarter 205." the words, ;nice of whom, made up and published quired by law, be .50s. and under 51s. duty shall WON." should be inserted. Mr. CHARLES GRANT said he . occupy the attention of the House. The Hon. Friend, who had just addressed '" been directed to the• principles upon wi Laws should be framed, rather. than the solution before the House. In the first Friend bad admitted and argued that 1815, had deranged the trade in corn riots extent, bat he did sot at all show proposed by his Right Hon. Friend k would not remedy the defect. Indeed, might be collected from the remarks of his. With respect to - a free trade in corn, which advocated by his Hon. Friend, he most sent from that proposition. He thought Briety was so evident th a t i t requ i re d ut the system of weekly averages 'stained of, yet surely it must be admitted . very superior to the system now in operatiou it there would be less chance of a confederacy even if there were a confederacy, there less change of any injurious effects resulting Ho agreed perfectly with . the reasonings ' been advaoced by hirßight Hots. Friend ot fee Foreign Affairs) %pen the subject, and reasoning. most conclusive *favour of . His Hon. Friend had advocated a sy duty, when the prices of wheat *add I 655. the quarter. He (Mr. Gantt) canfeseed ',peered tit hint to be a wish -te retie' Wham part of the old system. In fixing wheat, the peculiar burtbens which were tbe Aviculturists, and which had alwaysbeee lodged by that House, ought to be taken ;•-• ties. Re thought that very great reason &ma .why 60s. should be fixed upon - amain price, but be heard no reason . should -be adopted ; it was decidedly r below the average of the last seven Waned it was agreed on all hands, tbs pinged the Agriculturists bad not received E id ation. With respect to foreign ' met think it necessary to take that part hen coasideration ; it appeared to him to the Rasolution before the House, and therefore be content to leave it unnoticed. The measure had seedial_aupport. `, &r HENRY PARNEI.I. said, that he was one • who had in some respects changed his , Seq . guestion before the House. Since the . _... 1 .the subjects of rent, labour, and wages, bad been dearly explained than they then were. The - Hon.. tweet recapitulated the opinions.which be had stated ISIS and 1815. and confessed that they had a material alteration. 'He should support dap of Ministers, although be did nut k was protection. The Hon. T. LIDDELL said, that question , was •in which be took the greatest ineessees. He' les doftocorrani:eariee 't p fitirteo lh f":° :l; jl3 : 4ll s t ld fr i nta b l e f 1 " 0 65 g'—tbe Ca. ling out a mu st !It a fired duty , far preferable.ro' d move t h at pro. that the duty nf ; instead of 60s , or nay a d aarra to 35.. sty of 10,. Thi . prim Tm & I t sort:H.4i wee a „i to 1779 the eve r : 1818 the t,e t i wiiin bf 6d. j titi ; it there Was iv er 300,000 quaint: f. 0.000 quarters; to 1820, the h t. e under 60s. lie 'at with a dm / it'd not escrel if throwing )43 eat from °drat laded, under 33,, er incidental ea. Id be 40s. It ass ght suffer by the • Nff. In 1810,slth walled inflonce,a into this eisuntry H Ilind. Dori' g :ern of corn were otters from Flit,. Holland, making those three coua er the sway o f ens most desirous any supply floes 5 exercise of power g supplied by the assessed the means oared to him un- • tctical illustotion . and :condom of I times a dry one, er on the Houw, eider the question .uld not help its. :effect well before • was not necessary 7 Fore icjurioos 7 continueo to de- I in fact amounted • .... friendliness exist" . is he Conroy, there sm—(Hear, hear.) Agricultural is- it stands high in Several; but that, d on, it would for- the other blanches . the agticulturito, .. which he had es• eratiorse it would and to the lase . r• snowing, as so, the House,—tbst e price of wheal, r required by la. . he duty sh.li he ,4 , , 0 whenever ..4 rd in manner re. •-••:• . the quarter, the f I. would not long The speech of his .s ed the House had ..- which . the Corn • • the particular Bo It place, his Ha. bat the system of , ten to a very iojs• Mow that the piss d (Mr. Calming) red, tae contrary ;this Hoe. Friend. :. which had been • met certainly dies a. ought its impro. :.- ed no remark.— : bad been com . nitted that it wet . peration. Under i.• confederacy, and - there would be . resulting from it. nags which had lid (the Secrete/ . and thought that weekly average. systems of a fixed i be how Ws. to . dossed that the . , lila the mom pen tz zing the pride of .4 rete sustained by sleben adman • em into mosideft reason had bee im as an an tes: us advanced wb dedly and i t seven year[, and t il r4i rivedto of ua the p t a dur i ng;l yqundueee s the t d h i 0 or c. z to be foreign is. terefore he shoed e measure had hi. ,• it he was one d . , ed his opinions a .1 e the year 1815 E es, i y be had badrhh had : beesnldr statedm moo : port the .propor t smeastosay that .. .7 63 e hett ill so wa s s O' ill . .' • I