Star. — London, England, 1829-07-07 00:00:00

,LIGENCI I NCERY, JUL- 1. V. ROWS. _ . The facts of this case will be recollected. .1 _ in disposing of this case to , in the case of Jackson plea of a purchase for a •a -• notice. The cause came ice Chancellor, and he was insufficient. " It afterwards came upon appeal - before the Court, and I was of opi nion also, upon a particular objection that was made to the plea, that it was insufficient. The case did not state that the party pretended at the time of the exe cution of the settlement that she was seised in fee, and I thought noon principle, and upon the authorities, that on that particular ground the plea WAS insuffi cient. An application was made for leave to amend. by ulr. Walker, by whom the plea was drawn, and he stated, that it wits an accidental omission of his own. I then said, it the other patty require an affida vit of the circumstance under which the slip had taken place, they were entitled to have such an affidavit.— An affidavit was accordingly prepared, pointeJ to that particular circumstance. Upon this I directed the amendment to be made, and an order for the amend ment was drawn up conformable to that direction. The ground en which I proceeded was the prac•ice of this Court, as stated in the case of Wood v. Strickland. In that case it is laid down where a slip or mistake takes place upon a point of importance, the party shall be allowed to amend, upon an affidavit being made of the circumstances .attending the slip or mistake, and the Court being informed of what the exact nature of the amendment is to be. I therefore thought I was war ranted by what was stated in that case in permitting the amendment to be made, because the nature of the amendment was disclosed ; it was distinctly mentioned by the Learned Gentleman, to whom I have referred, how the slip happened, and the whole was afterwards put into an affidavit by the attorney in the cause. A subsequent application was made for leave to make a further amendment; but that application was not grounded on any particular slip, nor was any affidavit made of any particular circumstance attending it.— Under these circumstances I think I should not be jus tified, according to the practice of the Court, in grant ing permission to make any further amendment. Mr. Rosa hoped his Lordship would dismiss the ap plication with costs. The SOLICITOR IJaNaRAL considered the question a very fair one for the opinion of the Court to have been taken upon, and consequently, he trusted the costs would not be given. The LORD CHANCELLOR did not think it was a pro per question to have been raised, destitute as it was of ground to support it, therefore he felt bound to dismiss the application with costs. The Court proceeded on the Appeal Paper. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Wesesuarrza, JILT 6. Sittings at Nisi Prius. Before Lord Tnrrxaam l sod a Middlesex Comm Jury. Lord TIINTERDEN sat at half past nine o'clock this morning, for the purpose of disposing of undefended causes, upwards of fifty of which were taken. At half past elms o'clock his Lordbhip dismissed the Jury and retired. IYIIIMANCEJUDGMENT••-.HAHROT V. WISB. Lord TWITIRDCW said, the Court were of opinion that, although it might be presumed that the announce- ment in the Gazette was a sufficient notification to all British subjects, yet it would not go so far as to pre sume that the Captain had any knowledge of the tact of the blockade, and as the Jury were of opinion he had not, on that ground the verdict could not be al tered ; and as to the question of the illegality of the voyage, the Court was not of that opinion, therefore the rule could not be made absolute. Rule refused. YISH SAUCILHARVIT V. WINORAVE. The Areoanzi Gallium had obtained in this case, a rule to show cause why an order made by a Judge. giving the defendant the names of persons who pur chased fish sauce of him, should not be discharged.— The action was brought against the defendant for a fraud in selling spurious fish sauce, hearing the plain tiff's name, and purporting to be sold by him. The declaration did not contain the names of the persons to whom the defendant had sold the article, and it was urged before a Judge at Chambers that the defendant could not safely proceed to trial without information on the subject. Mr. F. POLLOCK this day showed cause against the rule, and contended that the defendant could not pre pare for trial without the names of the parties to whom the sauce bad been sold was delivered to him. The Arroaway.GatrsßAL, ii support of his rule, Ob served jocosely, that he did not expect to see his Learned Friend so ready to receive spurious sauce for Reading, or any other celebrated mixture. This was an action for fraud, and surely the Court would not allow the de fendant to obtain information from the plaintiff, by which he might defeat the action. The plaintiff's affi davit stated that his witnesses were customers of the defendant, and therefore he did not think it safe to give the defendant names of persons over whom he might have influence. The Court would see that the action' was of importance to the plaintiff; similar cases had been frequently before the Court. A person sent bad porter in bottles to the East Indies with another man's name, and the plaintiff obtained considerable damages. Lord Tzmanax—Let a man sell sauce in his own name; then no one can complain of him. Them was an action tried before Lord Kenyon, the plaintiff, a perfumer in Fleet -street, complained that another bad sold pomatum with his name. The COURT, after some consideration, held that it would be going too far to gi►e the names, but ordered the rule to be absolute for discharging the order made by the Judge, on the plaintiff undertaking to give the defendant an account of the times when the fish sauce was sold. The ATTCARNET GRNRRAL consented to draw his role up io these terms. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Juts. KLIMA V. IARRZN. It will be recollected that this was an action brought agtinst Mr. W. Farrell for violating his engagement with the proprietors of Covent-garden Theatre. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 7501. da maps. An application was subsequently made to the Court to increase the damages to 1,0001. that being the amount specified in the deed as the mitigated damages to be paid by whichever of the parties should violate the contract. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE delivered judgment to upon that application. His Lordship said, that in the opinion of the Court the verdict ought not to be dibtur bed. _ _ ------ ___ Dife.ol.lM. LAW INTEL --..as. .\ /4.4 , 4% : .:± - AT OF CHM.; ~74 • 7, 4 •••';' ',SJACILSON V i' 7 • 9, 1 -.0....L"4 .I',' :"-• - ILLOR, in 4 V A . s . 'e question k 400,4 4, Neg 31,7 , 1 4 : ' % upon a plc -,- ' l(4'l '. • tion without i itill4eßargialonour the Vice of ()pinion thit the plea was in MAIMINOTON IL CiMAR/M. The Court gaffe judgment in this case, which was fully sawed last week by the Counsel o n both sides. It was - 1 cased Tight of dower, on the psi& of the plaintiff, a widow, against the dffeedant, who became the put. chaser of her huiband's estate. The defendant replied to bee writ, that she had committed adultery with a person named Coulson. to which plea she demurred, and the case came before the Court upon her demurrer. It appeared that she had committed adultery with Coulson, and had not received any condonation from her husband. nor any permission from him. The words of the Act of Parliament, however, are to the effect that if a woman shall elope with her paramour in adultery, and continue to reside with him, and ►hall receive no subsequent condonation from her husband, she shall forfeit her dower. In this case there was no proof that the plaintiff had continued to reside with the adulterer, but still the Court were of opinion, in accordance with common sense, that the gravamen of the offence was in the commission of the adultery at all, and that though the words of the Act were in the conjunctive, still it did not require that all the facts should be proved of eloping, committing adultery, and remaining with the adulterer, as the mere fact of committing adultery wa► sufficient to deprive her of the right of dower. Under these circumstances the Court were of opinion that the defendant was entitled to a verdict, the plaintiff having been found to have committed adultery, which in fact was the only material matter to be con►idered of. LOGAN AND S EWELL. In this case it 'will be in the recollection of our readers that the defendant gave bail for a debt of 1201. One of his bail swore that his furniture was worth 2501. and that he agreed to go bail for the defendant at the request of his brother in law, who was taught by the defendant 48 the wiolin." He also swore that he rented the house he lived in annually, and not by the week.— Affidavits were put in subsequently, stating that the furniture of his house was worth ouly 111. and that his stock in trade and fixtures were not worth 101. more. It was also sworn that he was a weekly tenant, and that he received 151. for going bail for the defendant. Upon these affidavits a summons was issued calling upon the bail to appear and explain the matters contained in the affidavits. The bail accordingly appeared in Coart—and Mr. Sergeant SPANKIE addressed the Court in his behalf. He read an affidavit made by a sworn broker, stating, that the furniture, fixtures, &c. were worth 2501. and then contended that the bail was justified in swearing that they were of that value. The Cum Juartcs—That Sac. is a very vague word, brother Spankie. What does it mean? Mr. Sergeant SPANK I E—l should conceive that it ap plies to other USiM, ortant matters of little value. The Cuter JUSTICE—You could never loand a pro secution tor perjury on such an affidavit. Mr. Sergeant SPANKII admitted that the word was rather vague, but still as the furniture must be consi dered as of the main value, the introduction of the word " &et was unimportant. At all events, if their, Lordships were disposed to set aside the bail, there was, he submitted, no ground for proceeding against the bail. Mr. Sergeant WILD' was about to reply, when he was stopped by the Court. The CHIRP Jusvica then said that the Court was perfectly satisfied that this man should not be suffered to continue as bail, for it was clear that he WAS a weekly tenant, and at all events he should have condescended to state in reply to the affidavits what his furniture really was worth. It was sworn that hi► furniture and fixtures were 'nut worth 111. and in reply he •states that his furniture, fixtures, Ste. were worth 2501. This was too vague, and the Coots must, therefore, discharge the bail. Mr. Sergeakt WILDZ—My Lord, they base gained their object, that of saving time, for the bail rendered last night to the action.—Bail discharged. Sunday afternoon, several young men hired a four oared cutter for the purpose of goirig to Rich mond, and were returning home in the evening, about a quarter after eight o'clock, when they mere overtaken by another cutter, and they instantly com menced a race. They had got as tar as Putney bridge safe, when the crews of the two cutters exerted them. selves to get through before the other. They accordingly pulled with all their might, and the two boats coming in contact, one of them was jammed against the pier. The shock was so violent that one of the cutters was actually, in a measure, cut in half, and the five young men who were in it were precipitated into the water. Boatmen instantly put off from the shore, and succeeded in rescuing two uf the unfortunate young men, but the other three sunk to rise no more. Up to ten o'clock the bodies had not been found. We did not learn the names of the unfortunate young men. Saturday an Inquest was held at the London Hospital, before J. W. Unsling, Eq. Coroner, on the body of Joseph Palmer, aged 63 years. The deceased, on Thurs. day, was crossing Cheapside, when he was jammed be tween two carts, and received such severe injuries, that be expired soon afterwards in the above hospital.whither he was instantly removed.—An Inquest was held, at the same time, on the body of Ann Oliver, a married woman, who a few days since was standing near the fire-place,when her clothes became ignited, and she was instantly enveloped in flames. Her cries brought several persons to her assistance,who succeeded in extinguishing the fire, but not before the clothes of the unfortunate woman were burnt from her back, and her body severely scorched: She lingered for a short time in the hospital,in great agony, and expired on Friday morning. The Jury in both cases returned verdicts of " Accidental Death." An Inquest was held on Saturday at the Sun and Punch Bowl. Ray street, Clerkenwell, on the body of R. Reynolds, aged 57. About five weeks since, the de. ceased was brought before the Magistrate at Hatton Garden office, by the parochial authorities of St. An drew's, Holborn, for refusing to allow a %uitable main tenance to his wife. He then stated that he had a home for her if she chose to come to it, and if she did not hr would not allow her any thing, as he had every reason to believe she had transferred her affections from him to another person. On this refusal be was committed to the House of Correction for one month, during the whole of which time he was very unwell, and on his release, said to some friends that he had been placed in a damp cell, and knew that he had brought his death out with him, and on the evening of Thursday, he was found in a chair, in the back kitchen, quite dead. The turnkey was sent for, by the direction of the Coroner, sod he acknowledged that the cell in which the de ceased was placed, with two others, had been white washed only the same morning, but that from the crowded state of the prison it could not be avoided.— (This prison, which was intended tocontain not more than 500 prisoners, has now, we are informed, not less than Eso ). — Mr. Whitmore, surgeon, of Great Bath street, esamined the body, and stated the result, from which it appeared to him that death had been occa sioned by natural means produced by the change *fair and living; thedeceased being considerably addictedto the use of ardent spirits—. After some remarks from the Coroner, the Jury returned a verdict, fi that the deceased died by the visitation 01 GoD.” POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-MOUSE. A young man, named Samuel Goddard, was charged with having robbed a Gentleman named Mott of his watch and seals, value 101. It appeared that the complainant was passing along Cheapside, near the Queen's Head Tavern, at ten o'clock on Saturday, and the prisoner rushed up against him with great violence, snatched his watch, and ran off with amazing speed. The complainant fol lowed, crying " Step thief ;" and as be gained upon the prisoner, a man, whom he believed to be an accomplice, tripped up his heels. The chace was, however, kept up, and the prisoner was appre hended. The watch was picked up in a court which the prisoner passed in his flight.—Committed for trial. Yesterday a case came on before the Loan Mayo', which in some degree illustrates the errors of the present police system, and shows the necessity for a radical reform in many of the details. A man panted Weller was charged under the following cir cumstances: Mr. Britton. a Gentleman who resides at Clapham, stated, that on Monday last, in the afternoon, as he was passing along Grace church-street towards London-bridge, he observed the defendant driving two fine spirited horses in a cart in the same direction. Defendant drove up, to all appearance intentionally, against a stage-coach at the moment a Gentleman was stepping in, and it was a miracle that serious mischief was not committed. Defen dant drove on, quite careless as to the consequences, until hr reached Fish-street-hill, where he drove, evidently in the same spirit, against another coach, and broke the splinter bar. Witness, seeing that the public incurred great danger from the wanton con duct of the defendant, called to some officers who were at band, and directed a constable to take him into custody, stating at the same time that he should attend next day to complain, and giving the constable his card. Upon appearing at the Mansion-house next day, however, he learnt that the man who bad acted so offen sivelf was not in custody. As he considered that the officer who took upon himself the power of discharging the prisoner from custody, bad, by so doing. usurped the power of the Magistrate, Mr. Britton considered himself bound to have the affair properly investigated. He had heard from the officer whom he had given the directions to, that there were five others of the police aiding and assisting in the apprehension of the accused, who, notwith standing, contrived to get away. The bridge.keeper (one of the officers concerned) said, that the man bad been safely deposited in the watch-house by another oMcer, whilst he (the bridge•keeper) went after the horse and cart, for the purpose of taking care of them. lie did not consider the defendant to be in his charge at all. When he took hold of the horses, be noticed the brother-in-law of the master of the defen dant, whom be knew, and he delivered the horses and cart to that Gentleman. The defendant, however. contrived to get out of the watch-house, but how he managed to do so nobody could tell. The Loan Mania said, that this was a most bungling way of doing business. The person charged could pot, amongst so many officers, be kept in safe custody, and the cart and horses, instead of being sent to the green-yard, were given up at the discretion of the officers. The bridge-keeper said, be thought the other city officers ought to be responsible for the escape of the defendant. The other City o&cers thought that the ward officer was re sponsible. Every one of them did all be could to shove the bu siness off his own shoulders upon those of the bridge-keeper or the ward officer, who, in their turn, endeavoured to prove that they had performed their duty to the uttermost. In fact, if the state ment of all of them were to be credited, it was as much their duty to keep the defendant in safe custody, as it was the Lord Mayor's. The LORD Raves said that this was one of the cases which re jected much disgrace upon the police. For the sake of the public it was most necessary that persons charged with offences should not have the option of walking off at their pleasure. The Bridge-keeper said he had known the defendant ilia or seven years, and believed him to be a very civil unoffending person when 'ober. No suspicion was entertained that he would run away on the occasion of the charge, and how he got away was the wonder. The Loan Mayoa asked the defendant whether he had any ob jection to mention how he contrived to get out of the hands of so many officers, and through the bars of the watch-boos.? Weller said that he had been taken hold of because a bit of an accident, what he couldn't help, came across bim. He was in doubt whether he would let them take him or not, and if be hadn't seen his master's brother-in-law, who would take care of the horses, he'd be d—d if be would he let a dozen on 'em lock him up in that ere vatch.us--(Laughter). The Loan Maros—But, being in the watch-house, bow did you contrive to disappear? Defendant-11y, your Worship, you see yen I was alone I looked about, and I sees a vindor at the top of the vatch.us, and so I goes up, and as it vu open, I puts out my head, aid my body followed arta. Now, says Ito myself, if I leaps into that 'ere road, where the people walks, these here bakers will see me again, but if I leaps into that 'ere river, vy your Lordship they wouldn't see none eme—(A laugh). The Loao ?delve—And so you leaped in the water? Defendant—No, your Lordship, I leaped into the mud; and if they had seen me arterards, they wouldn't ha known me, because your Worship I w'ant clean by no mean,—(Laughter). The LORD Mayes thought that the watchbouse appeared to be just worthy of those who superintended it, and who had not the sense to secure a prisoner even when under lock and key. His Lordship having ascertained that the defendant was drunk when he drove so outrageously through the streets, fined him Ss. the only penalty his Lordship could inflict, as the person whose coach had been injured was not hs attendance to make a charge, which would subject the fellow to a more severe punishment. Mr. Britton submitted that the conduct of the (dicers deserved strong animadversion. It appeared to him that the power of the Magistrate was frequently usurped by persons of this kind. The Loan Mayo. thanked Mr. Britton for the great trouble be bad taken to follow up this matter for the sake of the public. The attention of the police should be much sharpened. If, indeed, things of the kind described were to be repeated, it would be better to get rid of the police as an useless expense. It is necessary to observe that the officers complained of are an steady and active men, and have never been complained of before. The fact is, the system is so excessively loose, and the officers have so many capricious and ignorant directors, that it is no wonder there should be frequent mistakes as to the nature of the duties as well as the extent of the powers. GUILDHALL. Jones Wiisors, Jesoph Herukrans, and Ma Friicre, otherwise Lancaster Jack, were charged with stealing twenty 'her?, the pro. perty of hlr.Vigne, of Walthanutow, from a field belonging to bun at that place. The first•natned prisoner Is a servant out aplace, the others are butchers. Mr. Vigo, stated that the sheep had been in his possession only a few days, that they were stolen on Wednesday night, and that they were worth 30s. each. The prisoners were apprehended through the exertions of Mr. Goulding, a butcher, in Aldgate, who had seen them walking on Thursday evening in the direction of Walthentstow. Upon inquiry in Newgate.inarket it appeared thirteen of the sheep had been distributed among three respectable salesmen, and sold ; and Henderson had takes the money at one place, and was applying for tt at another, when be was secured by Bans, a Jambi, to whom be said he had been employed bf a man named Brows. who was waiting for him at the end of the 'Hawks. Bates went there with him, and also to the Ten Bells, in Spitalliolds, but could not find Mr. Brown. Henderson now pointed out Laacestes Jack as the person who bad employed him, under the name of Brown. Lancaster Jack then stated that be bad acted under the directions of the two prisoners. They took him to the add at Walthamstow, 'there one of them opened the gate, and sent him is to drive out the sheep. He drove them up the road, and they all three sedated in slaughtering them at a house in Aymer-street, Whitechapel. The skins were cut in pieces and thrown into the common sewer.—The prisoners were then remanded till Thursday. BOW-STREET. Yesterday Joseph Retidisq, a middle aged labouring man, was brought before Sir RAMA lib 8111111, 00 a Coroner's warrant, charged with the manslaughter of another labouring man, named Dwyer. _ _ It appears that the deceased and the prhoner were rival lodging house keepers in Deptford, and lived In groat enmity with each other. About three weeks ago, in conuequence of one of them having reduced the price of Ms beds from four pence to three pence per night, a quarrel ensued, which was worked up into a belt by the wives of the parties, and then a general affray took pkee, in which some of the lodgers in the rival homes joined. In the course of it Dwyer *as knocked down, and the evidence adduced before the Coroner went to show that it was the rinser who knocked him down, and that he kicked him three times after he was down, and canoed the injuries of which he died in a few days atter. The Jury found a verdict of " Handaughter against Joseph Redding," and the Coroner issued his warrant accordingly. He was coomdited for trial. HATTON GARDEN. 11.4,, a tailor, who resided in Ormond-place, Lags Amend- yard. and who had been remanded on Saturdonon a charge of set. ring lire to his workshop, was again beneghe up yesterday for Two or three yaw witnesses were palmed so warrebentse the evidence given o &tinder. The prisoner was accompasied by his vide, who had a WU in her anus. As none of the evidenee wised% egret tbeihniale, she wow discharged; but Healy was fully conansissedler MM. MARY-LA-BONNE. Last night a Unen.draper, residing in Leicester-square, wri charged with having attempted to violate the person of Slizsbesk Whitelock, servant to Mr. Brooks, Oxford-street. It app e a red that the defendant went to Mr. Brooks's house on Sunday, to 'lst a young man, named George, who is in Mr. Brooks's service, a n d be then took an opportunity of getting into the kitchen with the servant, and assaulted her in a very gross manner. The defenda nt and George afterwards walked out together, and went into a pub. 11c-house, where they drank some liquor. He bad been but short time in the house when he went away, under some frivolous pretence, leaving George alone, and, returning to Mr. Brooke, house again, assaulted the servant. He was committed in default of ending bail. MA R LBOROUG H-STREET. Henry Avis was committed for trial for picking the pockets of several persons of smaU sums of money, at the !Leman Catholic Chapel in Duke•street s Lincoln's Inn-fields. UNION-HALL ROBUST 1T • 8110111Allo•••4 shopman in the employment of Mr. %Wheeler. linen draper, of Newington Causeway, was charg e d with robbing his employer. Mr. Wheeler has two establishments for carrying on his trate_ one at Newington Causeway, and the other in St. Paul's Church. yard. At the former shop the prisoner oliciated as superintendent. Mr. Wheeler having been informed that the prisoner was in th e habit of placing in his pockets a portion of the money be received from the customers, a plan was laid to detect him, by a pu ke being sent with some marked money to purchase some articles._ The marked money was afterwards found in his possession. letter was also found upon him from a female servant who formerly resided with Mr. Wheeler, couched in very endearing terms; th e main purplrt of which, however, was an application for more of the " needful," as Mr stock of ca sh was exhausted. In reply to Mr. Hosts, the complainant said that the primmer received a salary of forty pounds per annum, and his board and lodging. The prisoner said that he had inadvertently put the marked money in his pocket, and intended to have returned it again to the till.—He was committed for triaL A young man named Bond, who held a very good situation is the establishment of Mr. Coiling., the engineer, in the Westivin. ster-read, was charged with stealing some brass screws, &c. from the manufactory. The screws, &c. the prisoner had broken up to put into kis pocket; they were originally worth W. or 51. ►ut in the condition they were found on his person they would not fetch as many ski. lings.—He was committed for trial. Sunday morning, at an early hour, some thieves at. tempted to enter the premises of Mr. Briggs, an eaten. sive shoe manufacturer, opposite the Philanthropic School, in the London road. They applied a centre.bit to the shutter next the door, and made an aperture suf. ficiently large to admit a man's arm. Instead of with. drawing the fastenings, they broke the glass, and by the aid of a long rod, wilh a hook attached at one end, these" angling burglars," as they are termed, managed to withdraw property from the window to a consider able amount. From the time at which the family went to bed, the robbery could not have taken place before two o'clock ; and it is a little extraordinary that they should have affected their purpose in such a public road, and within thirty yards of a watch box. From the manner in which the " job'' was done, it would appear that, however daring, the thieves were not 'expert cracksitten. Saturday morning, about half past eleven o'clock, as Mr. Knapp, a respectable builder, residing in Ciren cester-place, Portland-road, was superintending some repairs going forward at the reservoir, or cess-pool, connected with one of the drains at Mary-la-Bonne In firmary, the foul air or mephitic gas exploded, and becoming immediately ignited from a candle held by one of the attendants, enveloped two workmen, named' Johnson and Carroll, in a body of flame, that scorched them in a shocking manner. Mr. Knapp, who luckily was not so much exposed to the explosion as the work men, escaped with less injury. Strong hopes are enter tained of his speedy recovery, but the two workmen were burnt all over in such a dreadful manner, that it will be some time ere their recovery can be expected. BIRTHS. Sunday, the rit6 inst. in TavistOci-place, bin. Edmond Gila, of a son. At Edinburgh, on the nth uk. the Lady of Job■ Graham, Es younger of BaUagnan, advocate, of a son. MARRIED. On the lad ult. at Holywood Church, the Ray. J. C. Hard; R.T.C.D. to Agatha, only daughter of the Bishop of Down mad Connor. At Glasgow, open the Sd Inst. John Anderson, Req. formerly of Calcutta, to Jane Dennistoon, second daughter of the lots G. Yaille, Req. of Cardroes Park, Dumbartonshire. DIED. At her horse, Alpha-road, Regent's Park, the 4th inst. Min Maria Taylor, third daughter of the late Sir John Taylor, Bart. On the Ist inst. Margaret, second daughter of John Wardly, Esq. of Strathavon, banker in Edinburgh. At Newlyn, Harry Julian, at the advanced age of 99 years. Up to a short time before his death, he was hock bale and strong, ha* ing recently walked several miles. On the 94th alt. at Aberbeen, Rebekah, second daughter ef Lieut. /Mean. IR. N. The ltith ult. aged three years and four months. Thomas, and on the 30th, aged twelve months, Robert, sons of Thomas Ewing, teacher, Edinburgh. At Cawnpore, cn the £sd January last, Lieut. Au►t. Pd , Murdo, 334 regiment Bengal N. L Thursday, the 25th, in the prime of life, Mrs. King, of Spalding, leaving six small children. A few weeks ago we announced tin death of Mr. W. King, shortly afterwards of Mrs. King's mother, and now we add a third to the list, making three deaths in owl family and one house in the short space of two months. Although Mrs. King was considered an abstameous woman, yet she was of an unfortunate size, being supposed to weigh nearly swenty.fm stone. Her remains were on Friday evening conveyed in a cart to the church, and thence on a truck to the grave, by the aid el twelve men.—Ssansford Mercury. NKWGATE AND LEADIINHALL MARKETS, Jae 8. Beef... .. ...3$ ed to 4s Od Veal ... ... 41 6d to OSi bluttou .. ...Ss Ild to 4s Od I Pork ... ... 4s Od to 41 84 Lamb Ss 44 to Ss 8d PRICES o► HAY Aso STRAW YESTERDAY. Of. iaf[O't. WHITICZATIL Hay 41 Ss Od to a los od Hay 51 158 to 41 las 01 Clover 31151 Od to SI Ss Od Clover 41 Os to SI 10, 01 Straw 51 Od to 21 Ss od Straw 11 168 to 41 28 01 PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP arc. Tara Tallow ... nos Od Yellow Soap 7111 s od Yellow Russia 59s Od I Mottled pie el White ditto .. —s Od I Curd .. . 01 Soap ditto ... —2 Od Graves ... 16. gd Melting Stuff 52s Od Good Drep g e Tallow Imported from St. Petersburgh. 105 Casks. PRICE OF SEW MCKIE. Kent 105 s to 1321 Kent ....... 1051 to lib Sinn i f Sussex 9sl to WO Essex Farnham Sao 1406 to 1661—Seconds. 100 s to 1401 QS Day bid at 448,000. IOPS, Jars S. NEW PAO& __ PRICE OF LEATHER. Best Brewing Hides Common Ditto 140 to 17d _ lfd to 2141 Crop Hides, 55 to 401bs for cutting l4id tolsgd Ditto 45 to 501bs lsld to 170 Calf Skins, 56 to 40Ibs Ditto 50 to 70Ibs Ditto 70 to OM, ... .. Small Sad,, Greenland) . 204 to 224 'fanned Hone Hides ... ... Spanish Hone Hides COAL MARKET, Jura 6. , Ships at Marts. Slips Odd. 1$ Newcastle ice I II Sundetiml Prim. 14i 54 to Sls 391 Id to 3ft Id HT OFI-W ATER at LONDON-BRIDGE TO.YORROW. lbws* is adoetell Aar 6 Wessman 41 inbummaaer Losrawis Prbad and Pubibbed by hens Yam.* *. Sas Orrscs, Nw i, Picket.plue, Tomb Bar. ~~ NUMBER IV OTICE IS E 4 -‘ sirens of Cour the me of the Army. To his Majesty's To Ms Majesty's C,aval and Qnarters Berwick Bucks Cornwall Devon Oats. Her. and Seas Hones In Bur Cornwall Dorset Essex Lancaster Middle*: Northampton That the deliveries • fifth day of Augset ne and marked " Tender f Office on or before will be received after T Proposals must be the Comities in Hants one Tender; and each annexed to the Tend known Property ettgagi tiering la the amount sta Performance of the Co unless made on a priu words at length; and tinnance of the Contract of the um., the amount paid In the first instance Particulars of the this Office. between the CONTRACTS FOI THE COMMISSA kis uuEsTrs That on TUICIDA V, thi ceseiveTenden In writini One Hundred Tone F.fty Tons of OAT: Siz Hundred (blunt One Hundred Thous To b. delivered into hi toed, on or before the ISt Samples of Oatmeal an tendering; a sample of ti tracts mag be seen at this Each Tender must met delivered before One o'i Penne who makes the ' mast attend to answer wi WIIRA VICT 1 T HE CO WM/SS his MAJESTY.? A, That on Tnovanav, tb sandy to receive Tenders ONE THOUSANI To weigh & 15, be delivered into the c l me Meath from tile date Sampki of Dot less tbs Party tesderiag. The Candklass of the C at the Victualling Mee, at Each Tender must specil delivered before One o'C Person who makes the Tt must attend to answer who ASHURST LODGR, TO BR SI At TUNBRIDOR WE[ unless previously d ACAPITAL PILE called ASH DINT ACRES of LAND. in a Lodge, with Gardens, La Buildings, consplete; shoat of Speldhurst and Asburst. miles distant front Tunbriti The Home is built of St prises large Drawing and and Library ; large airy laces of every description, Water. and commode a wooded and undulating cou Plantations, ioterspened w The Land comprises a Pasture and Arable Land. - May be viewed, fr.c. and sloe to Mr. Juba Tenser ' and Waterman, !_., Acme and Son, Soligleata, Aliw of the Estate way be Tvmbridge Wdle,llllo Jo FOR 1 N DIG EVI fIUTLER COOLI Moot Powders produ wiensbleg awl woeful to it all/ awl Coollot *inks =lleartiimi.7•Ti froglaith oseesity ef bevies remora arms led eumeses Math Wine seatteles the 'am beldipieee le the lazed moth whip. the weal dial &lib biases its ed. az Cheeptide. term at sal9 sad Prieetesenet. Rdieh Venders; et whom atay be LOZENGES. ter, Habitual 1 of the Uveb. Ic. aloe a Alper's. Su. sod the A NTAC relieving Heathens. Retell Appetite. Westbrook *s. s Mae at la. mid 46. Oben. tM INNIS SI 4'