Star. — London, England, 1820-11-08 00:00:00

NAPLES, OCTOBER 10. (Extract of a Private Letter.) " I should make no apology for writing to you, as My regard for you, and your natural: kindness, would require none; nor am I going to furnish you with the - adventures of Andrew Selkirk, or a sequel to Mungo Parke's Itinerary. The object of my writing to you is, in truth, that the purport of this letter may be conveyed to —, without the chance of inter ception ; for the villainy of all post conveyance through Italy is such, that I verily believe I might buy a letter, however addressed, at any one of the Post-offices from Naples to Piedmont. Twice have I written to him, from this place, relative to the affairs of the Queen, before the trial actually commenced, but have received no answer whatever, even in the shape of an acknowledgment. But as I do not choose to ascribe this to . anything like a self-elevation, on the part of a man whom I have ever been led to esteem as one of the last of the Romans, I am more inclined to impute it to some of that watching and walking espionnage that pervades every department now of our Foreign Offices—and that my letters have, most probably, fallen into the hands of the Milan Commissioners, or their spies. I therefore seek, through you, that which I am sure will prove a safe and independent channel of information to him of some matters that have but just occurred, though I am afraid too late, in this business of the Queen ; and which I hasten to request you will lay before him, precisely as I now give it to you. " The vessel called the Adamo, which was for merly the vessel in which she made her excursions to Africa and Greece, has just arrived here. Being on the watch, as a professed champion in . her cause, and from the conviction, through my own know ledge, that she has been most shamefully belied , a s well as to counteract the active enmity of certain emit saries, in furnishing charges against her, I this morn ing went on board, with a most respectable Gentle man, as an interpreter, for the express purpose of -4n ocular inspection of this notable polacca, and also for ascertaining from the crew on board what was the real impression on their minds, as well as the conclusions they had niade, on the conduct of her Majesty. I first began by declaring that I had come there with no other view but to ascertain the truth, and promote the undisguised cause of justice; and, whether their evidence would be in favour of or agamst the Queen, it would be equally my desire to have it honestly. Upon this declaration, the men to whom I addressed myself seemed extremely Sill - - prised; and declared most emphatically, ' that every sailor who had been, or still was on board that ves could have nothing to say against the Queen ; and that whoever attempted to calumniate he:, as far as regarded her behaviour on board that vessel, was not worthy of belief.' This voluntary burst of disinterested testimony, in the very outset, quite sur prised me, and immediately opened my eyes to the more than suspected character of the evidence that bad been already given before the Lords, by the Pilot and the Master of the same vessel. 1 asked to see such sailors as had sailed in the ship during the Queen's excursion only : the answer was, that Sir William A - Court had immediately, on the vessel's arrival, had them all on shore, and bad just sent off four (whose names are in the margin) for Milan, there to be received by a friend of the Queen's, who would tell them whether they ought to proceed to England or not ; for they had distinctly understood "that both the Captain and Pilot before-mentioned had left Naples as witnesses in the Queen's favour, and lama nut believe, on any account, that they had given evidence against her. They positively, there fore, asserted, that.the four witnesses now sent were going on her behalf, and could not imagine that there could be any trick or delusion in getting them to Milan. Besides this, they stated, without any sort of reserve, that. Sir William A'Court, in order to in duce them to go, gave each of them a present of money in hand, according to the sums placed oppo site their names, exclusive of all expenses and charges of their journey, and with an assurance that, if they were forwarded by her agent at Milan to England, they would be abundantly rewarded! This they all verified with one voice, declaring they had it from their four comrades, in whose hands they saw the Money - yesterday, at noon, before they set off.— Three of those remaining here still, were also of the crew when the Queen was on board, who state there ire about ten more of them on hoard another vessel daily expected in this port: all of them are ready to attest, that not a single cause for reproach or sus picion attached to her conduct while she was a pas senger; and that, as to the story of the kissing and dalliance on the gun with Bergami, it is a falsehood, and entire fabrication, which they will swear never did happen in the sight of any of them.' 44 From this it Would appear, that the Queen's cause and favour are used as tire means of decoy in the first instance, until they come to the crucible at Milan, and are converted by the notorious Com missioners. That a bribe, in the first instance, equal' to more than a tweliemonth's wages, is put in the palm, besides a frank of all cost and charges for travelling, &c.—and that, when at Milan, the pro bation takes place of conscience and willingness in the recruit, who is passed on to London, if found fit for the service; but, if stubborn and heretical to the creed of the Ministry sent back with all due cau tion and secrecy ; and this is what the advoecates and partizans of the ItiA call the open, fair, and asy road! `to impartial inquiry and honest judgment! " As 1 have in vain looked for any agent, banker, or assistant, here on the Queen's part, whom I might apply to in helping me to send off these witnesses, so material to the issue, and who would directly.con tradict the evidence of the Captain and Pilot (two of the most reputed rascals of the port of Naples), I am quite at a loss to decide what I should do. I would not hesitate, at my own expense, to drive off with them myself directly. But should Ibe yet in time? 1 would take and transmit their affidavits, but cui bono? They could not be given in evidence. In short, as 1 hurry over this on the spur of the mo ment, that not a moment may be lost in communi cating what has just come to my knowledge, I have not time to reflect what ought to be done, but I shall . - certainly not suffer any selfish apprehension for my own purse to check me in the pursuit of that which I shall conclude to be necessary to the support of the truth.. It is a greit stake, and must be played promptly and resolutely. - " The following are the names of the witnesses sent ,off on the 9th of October, from Naples, by Sir Wil lam A'Court : Saverio Garciullo, Mate of the Adarno, now in dock here - (present tla him) 300 dolhin. Gaetano Garciullo, seaman - - 60 • Antonio Castellano 60 Francesco Saverio Acampora - 60 The sailors who sailed with the Queen, left behind in prudence possibly : Giuseppe Paturzo, an old sailor, strongly in her favour. Raffaelo Castellano. Amello Maresca. "With this I finish the subject, assuring you, my honest friend, that, from what I have learnt and what I-know, it is my conscientious belief that the whole of these proceedings, founded in the supposition of her weakness and helplessness, are alike malignant, false, dirty, and disgraceful; and will be a stain on the scutcheon of Old Britannia as long as her king dom survives. I have traced all, from Milan to Mes sina, therefore am not incompetent to form my own epi THE QUEEN. MEETING OF THE INHABITANTS OF ST. GILES'S, AND ST. GEORGE'S, BLOOMSBURY. A Meeting of the Inhabitant Householders of the United Parishes of St. Giles in the Fields and St: George, Bloomsbury, was held 'yesterday in the Great Hall of the Freemasons Tavern. The Meeting - was most numerously and respectably attended. -The Hall, before, the appointed hour of meeting , was much crowded. A considerable space before the Chair, as well as the galleries, were occupied by ele gant females. About -twelve o'clock, Mr. PETER MOORS, Major CARTWRIGHT, Sir GER ARD NOEL, the senior Church wardens of the Parishes, and various other Gentle men, eniered the Hall, and were loudly cheered. Mr. WlLLis,' the - Churchwarden, took the Chair., The proceedings of the day were about to com mence, when they were suddenly interrupted by a person of the name of WATSON, who demanded to see the Requisition fur calling the Meeting., and pro-' tested against any person interfering in the proceed ings of the day, save an Inhabitant Hausebolder.--:- The untimely interruption of this individual created much confusion. Some expressions of contempt and disapprobation were directed towards him, when Mr. Masts, one of the Committee, entteated that the person who made the objection might be beard if he had anything to say; it was but just that he should be heard ; besiles, the Meeting ought to be aware that the slightest irregularity on their part would be exaggerated ; it would be- said that they wanted to carry everything by clamour, when they only waited to act according to the laws and Con stitution of the country. Mr. WaTaou was now called on by the Meeting, he declined to say anything, save to repeat his protest. The question was then put, whether Gentlemen in vited to attend the Meeting, though not inhabitants, should be allowed to deliver their sentiments, which was carried acclamations. The order of the Meeting, so strangely.interrupted,. having been thus restored— The CHAIRMAN proceeded to say, that the'Com .mittee invited several Parliamentary Men to attend the Meeting, many of whom were not able to attend. 'He then read a letter from Mr. Whitbread, explain: ing the cause of his absence; a le:ter from Mr. Grey Bennett, stating that he, regretted not being able to -attend the Meeting, and that he cordially approved of addressing the Queen, now that the monstrous con spiracy against her had been exposed ; Mr. Bennett's letter concluded by expressing a hope that Petitions would be presented by the People against the infa mous Bill of Pains and Penalties which the House of Lords seemed resolved to pass. The reading of this letter was frequently interrupted by the applause of the Meeting. 'L'he next letter 'was from Me. Den man: it stated that professional,business prevented that Gentleman from attending the Meeting. He would have wished to attend, to express before his fellow-citizens his sense of the duty and gratitude he owed to her Majesty. He felt a sincere admitation of the great qualities of her heart and mind, which he had frequent opportunities of witnessing in the progress of her unparalleled trial. lie looked upoh the proceeding against her Majesty as the most dis graceful persecution that ever disgraced the enlight: coed world !—(Lcud applause followed the conclusion of this letter). Mr. Ph:TER Moons stept forward and read the let , ter sent to him from the Committee, by which he was requested to attend the Meeting as one of the' Representatives of the People. He stood there not belonging to the party of the King or the Queen, but as a person anxious to preserve the Laws and the Constitution of his Country--(Applause)—to shelter them, if possible, from• one of the most dangerous at tacks that bad been made upon them in modern times. He could not help observing, that the two parties assembled were rather slow in their move ments, but he trusted they would be firm in their de termination. A waggon full of filth and falsehood, imported from another country, had been thrown upon her Majesty's character, and the extraordinary decision of the House of Lords would stand a lasting disgrace to the country, and to the administration of justice. Her Majesty found enemies both at home and abroad. She had the Pope and the Holy Alli ance opposed to her. She had opposed to her the servile efforts of Italian Cardinals and English Bi shops. But she alone was not the intended victim : the Constitution would suffer with her; for inroads were made on the Constitution similar to those which had been attempted in the times of the beastly Henry, Henry the Eighth. Of the character of the proceed ings against her Majesty, it was not necessary for him to say much. Instead of any observation of his own, he would read to them the words of a man who was truly a Nobleman ; he was ennobled by a higher patent than the patent of the King ; he was ennobled by the hand of GOD : he alluded to Lord Erskine—(Loud and enthusiastic applause)—a man lehose great talents and great. knowledge had ever been employed to put down oppression, and to up hold the liberty of his country—(Applause).—That distinguished Nobleman had said, on giving his vote, ,that his life was drawing to a Close; that he felt he would soon be called npdit to account for his conduct before another iribunal. His vote was. therefore given with more than ordinary solemnity. He then declared, in the face of his country, that The cdn spiracy against the Queen, was completely made out. The depositions taken at Milan had beenimproperly withheld ; Reganti and Rastelli ought to have been here ; everything was withheld that was necessary to do justice to this persecuted Lady, who had none to, protect her—against whom every power was in ar ray—whose husband, •if it were an ordinary case, could not skew his face against her. The case had been begun in corruption, carried on by bribery and per jury ; and, if triumphant, it would be the triumph of , foul injustice and cruelty I" These were the observaH tiotis of a man who declared that he had - received favours and honours from the King—who declared that fur the King he would tisk even life itself; but that he could not forsake himself and his GOD, by giving a vote contrary to his conscience !---(Great applause.)—lt was falsely and impudently said, that the proceeding against her Majesty was carried on by the State. He denied it; it was not the State; it was the Ministers who were parties to this odious proceeding. The Ministers were not the State; they were but its worthless and unworthy servants--(Ap plause).—He would now look to the decision of the House of Lords; and first, it struck him as a remark able fact, that one-third of the Lords did not vote at all ; one-third was absent, notwithstanding as active and corrupt a canvass for votes as had ever taken place, even in the most rotten and corrupt borough (Applause). There were twenty Bishops (A laugh ); eight of them were found absent, twelve of them voted, eleven out of the twelve supported the Bill— ( Cries of Shame, shame!) —He said it might be shame ful, but it was very true. Why, might it be aske'd, did not the entire of the Bishops vote? They found that they could not vote for the Bill, and something told them that they should not vote against it. There are such things. as pluralities and translations, and should ever a Reform take place (it could not take place too soon), the country would have to -consider with respect to these pluralities and translations. Eleven Bishops voted for the Bill; one only voted against-it. That one was the Archbishop of York— (Applause).—He did not wish to impute a bad mo tive; lie was wiiling to give credit to the Arch bishop,.but it was, he thoOht, somewhat curious to remark, that the only Churchman whO opposed the Bill, was one who could meet with no preferment; he was placed above all favouri the smiles of the Sovereign, or the power of the'Minister, could not make him higher. How different to a plain man would appear the duty of the Bishops; instead of supporting the Bill they should have gone into the closet of the King—they should have represented to i hint theloulness, the injustice, and the danger of the measure—and saved the Throne and the Country the lamentable consequences which might follow such a' measure. They, however, took another course, and --tshat was the end of the clumsy farce ? -why nothing but the defeat -f the Minister. Take, said be, take from the numbers who supported the Bill the names of the Ministers and the Officers of the Household, and the prosecutors will find themselves in the most wretched and forlorn Minority that ever marked *the disgrace of a fallen Mini ster—( Applause).—Happily for the country they were virtually defeated; the at tack was made upon one branch of the Thu:Me ; if one branch of the Throne were degraded, then might they tremble for the rest. The Hon. Gentleman con cluded by moving the first Resolution. After Mr. PETER MOORE sat down, the CUAIIRMAI stated that Mr. BARBER Beaustoar was in the room, and had a communication to make to the Meeting from Sir ROBERT WILSON. Mr. BEAUMONT now stood forward, and informed the Meeting that he had received a letter from Sir Robert Wilson, 'which, with their permission, he would read —( Cries of read, read!)—Mr. Beaumont here read the following letter : " House of Lords, Eleven o'clock. • " Duos Sts—l send you a copy of the Protest, which her Majesty has sent to the Lords, and which has been read in the House this morning, that you may, if you think it expedient, read it to the Meeting. " Her Majesty will herself be in the House at one o'clock, to take such fun iher measures as her Counsel may deem expedient. " Confident in her innocence, her. Majesty fears not to fast her Judges, and the same feeling prompts her to disdain the ma levolent exertion of their power.—Very sincerely your's, " Regent-sae -et, Nov. 7;1820." " IL WILSON." The Protest of her MAJESTY was next read by Mr. Beavatowr. The concluding paragraph—" She now most deliberately and be - fore GOD asserts, that she is is holly innocent of the crime laid to her charge, and she awaits with unabated confidence the final result of this unparalleled investigation"—excited the strongest emotion in the assembly. Many, indeed all the Ladies, were moved to tears. Most of the men-involuntarily rose from their seats—the scene was novel, moving, and in a high degreeimpressiee. Sir GERARD NOEL next addressed the Meeting. He said he stood before them an invited stranger. He regretted that the Bill had been read a second time ; 'but he rejoiced to say, that as far as the people had gone, they had acted with advantage to her Majesty and to themselves. Much, however, re mained to.be One. lf the Bill should find its way into the House of Commons, greater exertions than . ever would be necessary—greater exertions than ever would be made—( Applause ).—For himself, 'hede spised, he hated the Bill. It was an act which the House of Commons ought not to entertain. He re membered, about thirty years ago, when the mar riage of the Prince of Wales with Mrs. Fitzherbert took place. It was said by the Parliament, we will not interfere; the marriage is against the law ; it is, therefore, unnecessary to notice it. So he wonld now say of the Bill, it was not a Constitutional measure, and they ought not to ebtertain it. Should it, how ever, be persevered in, he hoped that the English people would feel and act as one body ; that a gene ral communication, would be kept up by the differ ent Committees throughout the Kingdom ; and that the people of England, like one body, would express to the House of Commons, in a.dignifiedand impres sive manner, their abhorrence of the measure (Cheers). The Honourable Baronet concluded by saying, that he did not stand there to amuse his audience ; but, whatever-might be the deficiency of his manner, he hoped his matter was sound, honest, and independent (A uses). —He then moved the second Resolution. Mr. HOLLOWAY seconded the Reiolution. ; he said he had the hononi of knowing her Majesty—he had attended her to various places of public amusement .:-.12e had always observed her conduct as affable and condescendingibt also . dignified impOsing. R eso l u tion waslisassed unanimously. Mr..THeLwALL moved the nest Resolution, vflek was also adopted. Major CAaTWRLGHT stood forward to move CI fourth Resolution ; the venerable Major was r t . ceived with the greatest applause. • From his 7;•,, a 'be was unable to address them 44 any length. l'„e ' proceeding against her Majesty he considered iile. gal and unconstitutional. If the proceeding on tte Bill of Pains and Penalties .had been regulated .t.e. cording to the principles of jurisprudence, Fur Ma jesty would have now stood acquitted. The pro. ceeding before the Commons House of Pat-Hamm differed from the fundamental laws Of the kingderm ; the Constitution required that every person accused should be tried by a Jury of twelve persons; and se tender was the law on this point, that it required thra those twelve persons should be unanimous in Ocii verdict. In the case of her Majesty, there wen ninety-five persons who dissented, and, therefore, justice had been done, if the proceeding against het bore any analogy to the law of the land, the IQ would have been defeated, and it would be ttclioas I to inquire into the manner in which the Lords fizz. assumed the rig ht of proceeding in the way that :tier had proceeded' against her Majesty ; the ri e ,il not theirs. If they wished to proceed awn dt;:g tn the Law and the Constitution, the obvious course would have been,, to have all the Peers impa , :nelled, and from that patine' to seleet twelve impartod, nest, and independent Peers, who, without favour. influence, or affection, to one party or the other, might hear the evidence, and decide on the question of guilt or innocence. After Major CARTWRIGHT concluded, several other Gentlemen addressed the Meeting. An Address to her MAJESTY was adopted; and, after Thanks had been voted to the CUAIRMAN ) the Meeting was dis solved, about five o'clock. FROM LAST MGM"S GAZETTE. BANKRUPTS. John Wright, sen. Ilan-street, Bloomsbury, upholsterer, to surrender November 14; 21, and December 19, at eleven, a Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Patten, Hatton-garden. George Trent, Bourton, Dorsetshire, maltster, November 11, 21, and December 19, at twelve, at GuildhalL Attornies, . Messrs. Bendel' and Dixon, St. Swithin's-lane. Frederick Francis Wragge, Parish of St. George, Gloucester shire, dealer, November 11, 16, and December 19, at two, .t ' the Rummer Tavern, Bristol. Attornies, Messrs. Hicks and Braikenridge, Bartlett's-buildings, Ilolborn ; or Mr. ton, Bristol.- • John .Charles Schwieso and Frets Grosjean, Soho-sqoare, harp manufacturers, November 14, 25, and December 19, at ten, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Jones and Bland, Great Mary-laiboime-street. .Philip Watkins, Bristol, oil and colour-man, November 22,23, and December 19, at one, at the Commercial Rooms, 11ris tol. Attornies, Messrs. Hurd and Johnson, Temple ; or Mr. Wigan, Stephen-street, Bristol. Thomas Woollvell, Andover, linen.draper, November 21, 22, and December 19, at tcn, at the Nlason's Arms, Andover. Attornies, Messrs. Todd and Footner, Andover ; or Messrs. Bremridges and Barnes. Dyer's-buildings, Holborn. Tfismas Ashby, - East-street, Manchester-square, baker, Nevem ber 14, 21, and December 19, at twelve, at GuildbalL At tornies, Messrs. Harvey and Wilson, Lincoln's Inn-fields. William Cooper, Fleet-market, linen-draper, November 14, 18, and December 19, at ten, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Dawes and Chatfield, Angel-court, Thrngetorren-4. James Kenworthy, Saddleworth, Yorkshire, dyer, November 20, 25, and December 19, at ten, at the Whiter Bear 1,-.11, Manchester. Attornies, Mr. Gibbon, Ashton-under-Line; or Mr. Bettye, Chancery-lane. William Fromow, Great Yarmouth, chemist, November 21, at four, 22, at ten, and December 19, at four, at the Norf4 Hotel, Norwich. -Attornies, Mr. P.irkinson, Norwich; gr Messrs. Poole and Greenfield, Gray's Inn-square. Ralph Withington Yates, Manchester, cotton-twist and we! , dealer, November 20, el, and December 19, at tea, at :lie Star lon, Manchester. Attornies, Messrs. Halstead and Ainl, worth, Manchester; or Messrs. Milne and Parry, Temple.'_ Ambrose Wilkinson, Liverpool, wine -merchant, Decembis•l, 6, and 19, at one, at the Neptune Into, Clayton-square, Li verpool. Attornies, Messrs. Blacksteck and Dunce, Rini 's Bench-walk, Temple ; or Mr. Kewley, Liverpool. Sampson Trehane, Exeter, silversmith, November 15, 25, and . December 19, at eleven, at the New London Inn; Exeter. Attornies, Mr. R. Bructon, Old Broad-street; or Mr. C. Brutton,astle-street, Exeter. November 15, Norris, Bishopatone, Wilts, shoe-maker, November 15, 16, and December 19, at eleven, at the Black Horse Inn, New Sarum. Attornies, Mr. Dew, Neva Canal, Salis bury ; or Messrs. Millen and Co. Middle Temple-lane. DIVIDENDS to be made at GUILDHALL. Dec. 9, R. Stevens, Banstead, Surrey, cordwainer, at ten. Nov. 25, R. and J. R. Townend, nitre-court, Fenchurch-st. merchants, at ten. Nov. 25, M. B. Schlesinger, Church-court, Clement's-lane, indigo-merchant, at ten. Nov. 25, J. Bell, Church-street, Spitalfields, bombazeen-manufacturer at twelve. Nov. 25, L. Williams, late of Nicholas-lane, Lonlard-street, merchant, at eleven. Nov. 23, S. Cowne, Barbican, pawn broker, at ten. Nov. 25, F. Fisher, FAlgeware-roati, nursery man, at eleven. Nov. 25, D. Davis, New Bond-street, jew eller, at eleven. Nov. 25, 8. A. Bennett, Worship-street and Battle-bridge, coach-manufacturer, at ten. Nov. 25, P. D. Abbott, Powis-place, Great Ormond-street, underwriter, at eleven. Dec. 2, E. Williams, Edmonton, grocer, at one. Nov. 25, J. Adcock. St. Mary-Axe, druggist, at ten. Dec. 2, J. Rime Carlisle, tallow-chandler, at ten. Nov. 95, R. Simp son, Crown-court, Threadneedle-street, merchant, at eleven. Nov. 25, I. Hart, late of Southampton, grocdr, at eleven, DIVIDENDS to be made in the COUNTRY. Dec. 19, T. Martin and S. Hopkins, Bristol, linen-drapers, at twelve, at the White Lion Inn, BristoL Nay. 25, W. Dyer, Northleach, Gloucestershire, grocer, at eleven, at the Upper George Inn, Gloucester. Nov. 27, R. Bryan, Loosuoild, Rad norshire, farmer, at eleven, at the Craven Arms Inn, Stokesay Salop. Dec. 4, S. Sutherland, South Shields, grocer, at eleven, at the Golden Lion Inn, South Shields. Nov. 50, J. Cook, Helmsley, Yorkshire, merchant, at ten, at thi house of Win. Tate, Helmsley. Nov. 29, A. Wharton, New Sarum, Wilts, clothier, at eleven, at the Black Horse Inn, New Sarum. Nov. 28, W. Wainwright, Liverpool, merchant, at ten, at the Bridgewater Arms lan, Manchester. CERTI F I C ATES—Nov amiss 25. H. Beard, Brentford, carpenter. A. Maitland, Brentford, ironmonger. R. Rainey, Liverpool, merchant. R. Bewley, Standon, Staffordshire:4, maluter. R. H. Hunt, Great Yarmount , wine-merchant. J. Armitage,. Birmingham, saw-maker. T. Farlow, Manchester, builder. W. R. Eginton, Birntinghis , dealer. J. Mills, Water-lane, Tower-street, wine-merchast . J. Miller, Norwich, chemist. W. Cobbet, late of Batley, aca of the Strand, bookseller. E. W. Dickenson, Liverpool, mer' chant. Philip Dixie, sen. and Joseph and Benjamin Dixie, Fat con-square, iron-founders. I). Reid, Princcs-street, SPital" fields, silk-manufacturer. W. M. Ashby, Albury, Surrey, paper-manufacturer. C. Hammond, Durham, draper. J. Stubbs, Castle-street, Leicester-square, jeweller. W. Hodge, Great Hermitage-street, ship-owner. W. lilacs, Orford-west , linen-draper. DISSOLUTIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS. Harpham and Small, Nottingham, porter-merchants. A. arta J. Spinall, Vbitehaven. J. add C. - Pubjoy, Walcot, San:rut, slaters. J. and Gr C. Creichton, Carlisle, dyers. F. and H. Keysell, Broad -street, Bloomsbury, cheestmongers. Grake and Co. Lauficestorr, Cornwall, milliners. Peers and Criuhlow Beaumaris, Anglesea, grocers. Cole and Stacey, Yeovil, So merset, glove.nunufacturers. Sp: crow and Co. Wolvtrhalar son, iron-masters. J. S. and T. E. Radford, Hull, me:chat. LONDON: Printed and pubitched by LITIA KAM, nal" . rat. i , bi -the At • 4 IL r )11 . tri . .4" af so, •N ~• 1 'id lsre icol rec con Sea of of Pei to are PO C on ba 11 11 tic L Pi Al a As #4l