Star. — London, England, 1820-10-04 00:00:00

# • Na. th • have told hint what be here States. No such thing had token place at the time. It might have been invented; but that the well-known Gentleinan who accompanied,"upon this decision, the well-known Mr. Krouse, Could tell by mere chance what hap pened in a year after, is as utterly impossible, as that 2'he Died' was written by chance. We are nqw familiar with the arrival of Italian witnesses; bat, my Lords, if.we carry our ininds back to July of the year 1819, can we suppose for # moment that any per son then dreamt of a tutbult occasioned by such a circumstance? This, on the part of the witness, was evidently the invention of a moment to cover his retreat from the disadvantageous position of credibility that (Indoor w nanfesses to falsehood and pre vesication—that candour-Iv/3kb iniaet proves that a witness is not to be believed. As to her explanations, it is impossible to admit them. Her detsbkenlendrcs do not fit. Her intention In the letters is, from the letters themselves, quite intelligible. It is rendered unintelligible by. taking her cipher. It is doubtful only when she begins to envelope it in her own falsehoods- and lies. A plain honest man, solely intent upon telling the truth, never entangles himself in such a miserable web. He moves forward in the evidence he has to give, exciting no suspicion in his progress, but goes powerfully on to his object, tearing through all such flimsy impedimenta, I trust your Lordships will believe this woman to have been sincere when she praised her Illustrious Benefactress, that she then spoke in the eloquence of feeling, In the ardour of gratitude, in the sincerity of a heart not yet fofgetful of favours received, and that it was only in con sequence of her dismissal, in consequence of her refusal to take her back, in consequence of the promises held out to her, that she entered into this business, and joined the - band of the other conspirators who were arrayed against her Illustrious. Mistress. It would appear that she was kindly and warmly attached to her own sister, that she loved her sincerely. She said that the principle en which her conduct proceeded was anxiety for the welfare of this sister. I take her own account of the matter, though Ido not believe it. She represents herself as affection ately attached tp her, and does everything in her power to procure her a place in the service of the Queen, in that house which, if all or even half of what your Lordships heard at this' Bar be true, should be considered, as my honourable Friend, the Attorney-General, said, not as a palace, but a brothel. Her letters, however, in which she solicits a place for her sister, were written after she left this brothel—after she made application to be restored to the service of the Queen and was refused. Can these circumstances be believed in connexion with each other? , Though we may account for her anxiety to continue one sister in the service, and to have another received into it, what expla. nation can be given of her own application? They were poor; she, according to her own account, was rich. She had no occa sion to go back. Ilowas this to be explained? Must we say that the prudent and frugal Swiss chambermaid balanced against each other the profits and disgrace of the situation, and that the former preponderated in her mind ' • that she was willing to act upon the principle of that Roman Emperor; who, so he raised a tax, was not over-solicitous as to the nature of the material? However this might be, whatever were the motives of this chaste and delicate shepherdess, certain it is, that many months after her dismissal she endeavoured to get into the service of the Queen one sister, who was wily fifteen, and to retain in'tt another sister of seventeen. Such is her own account of the matter. Ido not after all believe she was so bad, that she was so regardless of her sisters morals and welfare, as to desire they should fill a situation in the Queen's house, if she thought it to be the brothel described. I believe she was sincere in her let ters in her praises of her Illustrious Benefactress, in her wish to return to the service, in her desire that her sister should con tinue in it ; but I believe when she was dismissed, when her application for being again taken back - was refused, she then joined in this crusade against the Quern, and gave her testimony in utter ignorance that these letters could be brought forward against her. So much for this lady and her virtuous testimony. —I now come to that amiable gentleman, M. Sacebi ; and here I cannot but observe, with great satisfaction, what a change has taken place within a few years in the sentiments of a certain - class of men in this country. The manner in which my Learned Friend (the Attorney-General) alluded to this witness, as a person raised on account of his merits to the rank of an officer in the French army, chews how greatly prejudices have' vanished within a few years, as well ag iinst such Italians as , served in the French army as against the French themselves. Some time back it would have been thought a most strange thing indeed that the principal witness in such an important trial as this, in a matter of such extraordinary delicacy, an inquiry involving the highest interests of the country, should be a person who had served under that implacable enemy cf our commerce and our glory, the Corsican Usurper, as he was called. No person venturing to predict such a thing would have been be lieved. I remember that whole volumes were written for the purpose of proving, that any man's being promoted as an hussar, or partisan of Bonaparte, implied everything base, everything hostile to this country, and to the peace of the world. Here, however, is a cast-off servant, a courier, a person who can only say, that he served as a common soldier in the French army, and was refused the place of Serjeant in another service, living now at great expense, keeping his servant and a ll this because he is employed to give testimony against his former mistress. I beg of your Lordships to look to the account he gives of himself. He has appeared unc'er various names, four at least; three whole ones, and a dinfeoettses one. On hia first at rival he commenced simply with Milani, but then, in compliment I suppose to your Lordships, he assumed two —(A laugh/. He said he came over in the service of a Spanish family, but this was a douPc entendre. lle that represented himself as having come on a law suit. Ile positively denied that he was well paid. How then does he live? I low conies it that he is able to keep a ser vant? • lie left the Queen while in the service of courier, and emu - eased a wish to be taken back. It is not probable, there fore, that he abounded in money; and by what means has he been enabled to live in such expensive style? In this, as well as in other respects, he resembles Miss De Mora. They both ERA expensively, and both deny that they received any money unless for necessary expenses. lie sad that he never had more at his banker's than fitly Napo'. - Being asked wheth:r he ev.r repreaented himself as haying more? he would nut say. L is plain 11 - .11.1 this that he eves appreliens;ve of being detected in a falsehood. If he .never had more than this sum at his banker's, could he, if be was a man of Huth, hesitate about an swering the question, whether he ever represented himself as having rune ? 'T hough he said be had more when he had not, be niigh: hive easily got over the difficulty. lie would merely have told two du hie ent:nd.-Js in place of one--(1 laugh). He was asked if he ever said that he was in a miserable situation, ard taxed himself with ineratitude to his benefactress ? " Never. Were you ever iu a situation that required compassion ? Never. Did you ever ask any one to speak to the Princess to have you restored? I may. Did you ever tax yourself with irgrati tede? Never. Are these letters yours? They are; I might have written so, but I did not say so." Now when such a question had been put, would any honest man shelter him self wider the mere word soy, under so pitiful a quibble as this? And now, my beds, 1 will draw your attention to one of those extraordinary and providential ace:dents which some times occur to defeat coral ;racy and protect the innocent. Pro t:do:OA 1 must call it, fur innocence is alWays the care of, Pao vtnesee. Being asked why be charged his name? he said it was ire consequtince..of the tumult that took place. Being asked wbeu he changed it, luckily he forgot the date, and said it was in July, 1819, be came to this country and changed his name. Now the tumult at Dover did not occur till the July following, in 1820. These are the accidents by which conspiracy is de feated, of which any of your Lordships might become the vic tims to-morrow. When the Attorney-Ueneral came to this point in the re-examination be did not press it, aware that it would be only making bad worse, hut fortunately one of your Lordships put the question. I shall now beg your Lordships to turn to page 459 of the evidence, and, for the purpose of preserving the conoection, I will read the questions and answers as they refer to this important circumstance :—" When did you set out for Eng land? 1.1 July of last year. Be so good as to say what was your motive fin' taking that name at that time in Paris? After I knew that I was known in London by that name, I tried to sh :lee myself against anything that might happen to me.— W het tureu:: bed happened at that time which induced you to tike that name ? I was warned that the witnesses against the Queen might have run seine risk if they bad been known. Had you beers infoirued that they actually had run any risk? They had not had any rabchief. What do you mean, by saying, that ire sonseqte-oce set the tumult that had happened you teak that name? WMle I was in Paris a gentleman came, accompanied by the courier, Krouse, and this gentleman told sae that it wouLi be necessary for me to charge my name, because it The Countess Gun, and several other witnesses, on behalf of wou ld be too darigerons to eptUC to England under my own her Mamie, in addition to those which had before cerise over,' name, as 1 had told him I was known in London under my own , arrived in town yesterday, Ws Dover. name. Did he say that a tumult had taken. place? He told I • Saturday, six troops of the 4th Light Dragoons marched frees me of some discard-tr. On what occasion did he say that that Canterbury fur the vicinity of the Metropolis, four to Croydout.l disorder or tumult had taken place? He tied me no more. I I and two to Bromley, where they are to remain during the pro. j understand you to say, that it was in respect of other persons, ceedings in Parliament regarding the elezete—Saturday, du what do you Mean by other persons? I meant to say th at some troops of the lith Dragoons also left Brighton Barracks, for the disorder had already taken place in respect of other persons on vicinity of London. the saute account. fur simiter causes. What do you mean by I Coale-Exeneyee, Mass -Watt, OM 4.—We had hut little same account, ter similar causes?. I have repeated what the Wheat fresh up this morning, but a very considerable quantity gentleman odd me. Did you understand that it referred to remained over from Monday's supply, for which there wa s wititeases wait had conic to give evidence in the case of the , or no demand to-day ; a few whet samples obtained M ug • Queien? I believe it was to this purpose. Did you know that . prices, but no offers were made for the inferior 3,tiahae, of any witueseea bed at that time conic over to give their evidence . which description the inakte-Plln of the suPPlVebniistas fleet in the cause of the Queen? I did not know certainly, but in the Essex and Suffolk. Barley is is. pet:smarter cheaper, and very same way that I was coming X thought It probable that others dull sale at that decline. Thor - Oat trade was very heavy at might have conic." • j Monday's prices. *Means sad Yea bat little doing, although Bactoonast proceeded. I deny that any pewit could, •IktatWin lower terms. • - - " • •-• . he had unwarily got into. It is only by such circumstances that conspiracy can be detected, and this leads me to remark, that if it can be *hewn, act trust it is, that there is perjury op the part of this most materittof all the witnesses, the case is at an end. I come now to another circumstance, that which is said to have occurred in the carriage. I will put it to your Lordships, whe ther it be in the smallest degree credible, that such a thing could take place in the open day, without any covering, un der circumstances where detection was absolutely unavoidable? Will your Lordship believe, that with a knowledge that a courier was always travelling by the side of the carriage, that he frequently came to raise up the blinds; with a certainty that if discovered it must blast her character for ever, render her odious, disgraced, and degraded in the eyes of mankind, will your Lordships believe that any female, I will not say a Prin cess, but the most vile and abandoned of the sex could place herself in such a situation? Credulity must go still higher. Even if your Lordships believe that this occurred once, you must stretch your belief still further, for Sacchi says, he witnessed it not once but often. Does this carry with it the least shade of likelihood ? Is it in the common coarse of things, even with the most profligate and aban doned of females ? The circumstances themselves without the aid of contradictory testimony of any kind are enough to refute the charge. Here are two persons in a coach, going at the rate of nine or ten miles au hour, with their hands placedand oontinuing for a considerable time in the same position, notwithstanding the jolting of the coach, notwithstanding their being asleep. If a philosopher, whose only object was the dis covery of truth, were to assert the possibility of such a thing it could not obtain belief, and your Lordships are called upon to give credit to it on the testimony of the immaculate Sacchi! No description was given of the carriage. Why has not this been done? What if I shall prove that it was an English carriage, with spring blinds, which could nor be opened in the way the witness has described. What if I shall shew that it was not Sacchi, but another person who acted as couritr upon that occasion? lam not called upon to db this. Why were not these circumstances gone into by the Learned Gentlemen who conducted the case against the Queen? It was their business not mine. They ought to have brought forward every circumstance necessary to establish the charge of guilt. An accuser has no right to demand that witnesses should be called in proof of innocence. Sacchi was asked if there was any other person in the carriage at the time? Nos ml ricwdo. He recollected nothing of it. I beg your Lordships to attend to this important circumstance. Does his asserted want of resollection here look like truth? There was, however i a third person in the carriage, as I can }rove. To the question, whether he ever mentioned the circumstance to any person, he answered, never until he was examined. Is this likely ? Can rier Lordships believe it ? When a servant wit nessed such a thing a this, can it be supposed that he kept his mouth hermetically sealcd, that he never once mentioned it to any person, that' he did not communicate it even to the genth and tender De Mont, with whom be was in habits of intimacy for so long a time? It is remarkable that all the witnesses were uniform in stating, that they never mentioned a word of what they knew until called before the Milan Commission. Cow iers, chambermaids, masons, gliders, carvers, all were unanimous in this assertion. Sacchi, indeed, to give a plausible variety to the case, was better instructed. Ile admitted that he told it to some persons, but he couldnot name one. If it was improbable that he could witness such a thing without telling it, it was equally improbable that he could have told it without recollect ing to whom. I now come to another witness, the chamber maid at Carlsruhe, and I say her story is impossible—. The hour of four having now arrived, Earl Garr moved, that the House do adjourn.—Adjourned. : ; . NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. The Bt.ossom, of 26 guns, Captain Velum, destined for the Cape of Good Hope and the St. Helena station, is still at Spit head. 'She is under orders to receive on hand some Govern ment money, for conveyance to the Mauritius. .. The Hope, Laieu, from °port'', to Weymouth,was abandoned by the crew on the 25d ult. being full of water. The William and Mary, Rom Petersburg!' to Liverpool, having sprung a leak, was going into Yahrsund on the 18th ult. to discharge and repair. The Heisteller, trom the Havannah to Marseilles, was going into Boston on the 6th ult. with loss of main and foremast. CONSTAN7ZOME, A t:G. CS.—The Convert, arrived from Odessa on the 25th, picked up a sailor, 50 miles from land, on a spar, nearly exhausted, who states himself to have beloeged to a ves sel from Trieste, which had upset three days before, by having too little ballast. FALMOUTH, OCT. I.—Wind W.—Arrived the Four Friends,, Ttoseters, and Commerce, Homo!, from London. Sailed the Hope, GOURNCTO, for --a.. Pr.vsloczn, Ocsosza 2.—Arrived the Averick, Moons., from Amsterdam for Norfolk, with considerable damage in her hull, and must go into dock to repair t and the Lord Stewart, from Uantzic.—Wind W. N. W. Porrsnourn, Ocvosza 3.—Wind N.N.E.—Arrived his Ma jesty's ship Asr from a cruize ; and the Loring, SKARMAN, from Patras.—Sailed his blajeuy's ships CastezioN, Remota, and luau, on a cruize. Ocrosna 3.—Wind N.E.—Arrived and remain the Latona, Hess's, from the South Seas • and the Claremont, GAWDIX, from Jamaica. The WallaceF.lmm, from St. Do mingo, is arrived off Folkestone, and the boatmen state she will reach the Downs nest flood. One of her masts is much damaged. Hamm:Ara, Ocr. 3.—Arrived the Vrow Ilendicker, VANDER Oswalt, from Rotterdam for London, with the loss of anchor and cable. A KGATT, OCT. s.—The Policy, Batorron, from London to the South Seas, got on shi re yesttrday on Margate Sand, but was got off this morning without material damage, and is now riding in the itords. Cowls, Ocrosta 3.—. Arrived the Grenada, Donato, from Samarang, out five months. Livzsroot, ()crows 2.—Put - back the Cuba, for St. Peters. burgh, with loss of foretop-mast. Arrived the Ardent, PAT TERSON ; and Earl Lonsdale, Gaooas, from St. Andrew's, N.B. and the Jong Wilhelm, PAILLETEIT, from Rotterdam. Artftivzo—At Mararham, the William and Henry, Jenkins, from London. At Genoa, Anne, from Bristol ; Aspasia, from Buenos Ayres ; and Forsoget, from Drontheim. At St. Ars drew's, Vertumnus, Stenhouse, from Cadiz. At Oporto, Jolly Bachelor, Cadenhead, from Bristol; Brilliant, Bulmer, from London ; and King<cove, from Newfoundland. At Tervere, Prudence, from Liverpool. Custoar-Housz, Ocrosea s.—Ships F.ntered Inwards: The New Hope, from St. Petersburgh ; Mary, from Harlingen; 'William, from Riga ; Yrow Drewke, from Worcum; Hebe, from Stralsund ; Richard and Ann, from Stangate Creek ; the Hawher, from Sierra Leone; Gras Von Essen, from Stralsund; Herefordshire, from Canton ; and the Lively; from Riga..- Entered Outwards : The Johanna, for Bremen ; the John, for Genoa ; Volusla, for Jamaica; Harriet, for Odessa ; Eclipse, for St. Thomas's; l'hcebus, for Hatriburgh; and the Prince of Saxe Cobourg, for Rotteriam.—Cleared Outwards : The Duna, for Hamburgh ; Trafalgzr, for Antigua; Deptford, for Cadiz; the. Mary, for Cork; and the Heron, for Hamburgh. 'g EVENLNG - sm R LONDON. TO-MORROW, 4,300 TICKETS TO BE DRAWN—ALL WILL BE PRIZES—TWO £lO,OOO, TWO Xio,ocio— TWO £lO,OOO IN THE FIRST FIVE MINUTES— ALL IN STERLING MONEY. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1820. The necessary full detail of that Trial in which every subject of the Empire takes so deep an interest, obliges us to be more brief than we Could otherwise wish, in our accounts of the accouchement of the Du chess di BERRI. The Paris Papers are filled with details of the rejoicings, in consequence of the birth of an Heir to the Throne of France. The whole City was illuminated on Thursday evening, the day of the birth, and fire-works were let off in front of the Thuilleries. Due pains were taken to have the cer tainty and identity of the birth put beyond all possi bility of cavil, by calling into the chamber of the Duchess, before the umbilical cord was cut, the Duke d'Acsurean, Peer and Marshal of France, the Duke de COIGNS', and several soldiers of the National Guard, who were on duty at the time. The young Prince was baptised on Friday, by the name of HENRI CHARLES FEEDINAND DIEU-DONNI (Gods GIFT), Duke of BOURDEAUI, &C. &C. As to other foreign events, an article from Naples, of the 12th ult. states, that it had been announced by telegraph, that Sicily had submitted to the Constitu tional Government.—Those Spanish Bishops, who had assumed some of the powers of the Inquisition in prchibiting the circulation of certain works, have, by a Decree of the Cortes, been prohibited from ex ercising any such functions. The affairs of Am PACIIA seem in a very critical state. A letter from Venice, of the 20th ult. says— " Au PACHA is in a desperate situation : the maritime for. tresses of Epirus, from Butrinta Peeves*, have surrendered to the Commandant of the Ottoman Beet. NAID/OUD Bar, the grandson of Au, after defending Parga for some time, seeing no hope of relief, surrendered himself prisoner to the Turkish Commandant. Au himself, abandoned, it is said, by his sons. 'overs& and Vier, is shut up with all his treasure in the town of Sepelini, or, according to other accounts, in the Castle of Petilin, on the Lake of Janina, and cannot escape, having no other alternative than to surrender himself prisoner, or to die in despair.—This intelligence requires confirmation." THE QUEEN. We were necessarily obliged to abridge the con cluding part of what Mr. BROUGHAM delivered yes terday in his very able defence of her MAJESTY. In our preceding columns we have therefore given a full report of that pai of his speech. In our subsequent columns will be found an ample report of the proceedings of this day; but before pro ceeding to the detail, we must devote a portion of our columns to the elucidation of another subject, to which the attention of the House of Peers was called yesterday mai ning by the Earl of LtvettPdoi.— namely, the threat alleged to have been denounced by Colonel BROWN against the younger MARLETTE, resident in London. Every person at all versant in the affairs of the world, knows how easy and bow common it is t when any impression is wished to be removed, or a new complexion to be given to it, to get letters of explanation framed to suit the object in view: but it generally happens, where the object is worthy of the investigation, that other letters being ne cessary, for the information of some of the parties, that they may not be surprized at the post facto colouring wished to be thrown over the object, these letters also reach the light, and thus remove the veil that had been attempted to be drawn over the transaction.— Now this happens precisely to have been the case with the subject before us. Let any one read the subjoined correspondence, and they will feel no difficulty in corning to a just conclusion respecting the explana tions offered by the now celebrated Col. BROWN, through the First Lord of the Treasury, on the open ing of the House yesterday: wa ie- PROM M. MARIZITI TOT KLOTZ, TO EIS $01! AI Milan, September 16. Dearest Son—l have received and read your letter of the 3d instant. Relatively to the threats conveyed to me by Mr. Brown, I must repeat to you axe more the same observations I then made—that If is expedient to cut short with the great (tagliar curt. via gransk). They are always in the right. You have taken up the 'matter with much heat; in the main you are right, I feel that you are so, but you have carried it too far.— It is true that Brown has expressly and repeatedly insisted with Mr. - Albertonio, that be should make known to you the dissatisfaction in that quarter towards you, and the dan ger of the Alien Bill, which you were going to encounter.= But, nevertheless, follow the judgment of your father, who knows by experience what Is most expedient, and for the best, in similar cases. Abandon the object, and allow the controversy thus to terminate, since, by persons of mean con dition or inferior rank, u you and I are, it is sufleiently well terminated by what has been already done. This instant a courier has arrived with latter* of the sth, and by the paragraph relative to Milan you may see how completely what Brown saiellere has been verified. You treated and spoke with the person alluded to, believing him quite a different character. I will speak with Peter at his return, as I hive to-day spoken with Sperati ; but whatever happens, what you said is right, that you, Peter, and Spaeth are well known, for persons of ewe and character, and very different from that good for-no thing individual (fuel peon di bum.) But the conclusion is, to keep everything silent, and to prevent all publicity. I salute you, your affectionate Father. no. vs.—urns rosie me. xAstarri Sig was vo couunn. BROWN. Milan, Sept. la. Most worthy tikagl-1 understood, with great astern, that your nerve has been compromised in a luting of conversation, which wasuuppoeed to have taken place between you and mc r..,- Isisive to my son Joseph, at present in London. I think it there. Ware a duty to declare, as I now declare upon my honour, that /'no conversation ever passed between yon and me, directly on tide subject. If the expressions contained in a letter written by Sae to my son are somewhat strong, they must be ascribed to th: affection which a lively interest in him created, and a conformity to the advice I have always given him—advice tending to marl. kst the necessity of adhaing to .the system adopted..by me, mover to mix in affairs foreign to one's own business. It grkv,:s me exceedingly that an interpretation has been given to my ict. ter opposite to my intentions—an interpretation which suppli.s materials to discussicns irrelevant and ill founded. My dispica. sure in this case increases at seeing that a similar interpretation has caused doubts regarding the good faith of an indivitb .1 whose distinguished and honourable character is known to me by long experience. I consider you, moreover, as incapable of making use of the threats which are attributed to you, as the British Govern/Tic-1 is of executing them. In taking this mode of stating to you the sentiments with which I am animated in the present ernergercy, I experience the sweet satisfaction of fulfilling a duty which is incumbent upon me, and I take the opportunity of assuring you of my perfect esteem. NO. 5..-LETTIS FROM MR. TO COLONEL EILOWN, Milan, Sept. 19. M. Colonel—lt is nith regret prorortioned to the respect which I bear you that I learn that the sense of a letter written by M. Marietti to his son, has been so ill understood as to have imputed to you the communication of an intention on the part of the British Government to watch over the latter, 'and to send him out of England on account of his relations with Bacchini, a witness in the case of the Queen. I remember that you said to me, one morning that I was present with you on business, that you had received a letter from England, stating the inter,- ference of Joseph Marietti th's affair, and that you could not but regard such conduct as a little unwise, and foreign to his oc cupation in London. I cannot at the same time forget that I regarded this communication as a simple opinion emanating from yourself, and very far from the expression of authority or of menace. As regards what is said on the Mien Bill, of the pro. visions of which I am ignorant, it is a duty I owe to your cha racter, always frank and loyal in all respect; to say, that you never gave me the least reason to fear E,r the personal security or the protection of the said Joseph hlarietti. I can add, that I thought it my duty to beg 111. ltiarietti, the father, to write to his son, to advise him rot to mix in an affair so foreign from his occupations, but to restrict himself to the wise and moderate conduct which has always distinguished him ; and if in writing to hint his father has made use of strong expressions, they ought in no wise to be ascribed to you, Colonel Brown, but sokly to the COA fidunce and p aternal affection which dictated them. woe 4.—Larval roost 311 t. usasurrn, ?U& awns, le wlslicag, aN unixtatt, NOT WD TIDT:RDAT ZIT LORD LITRRTOOL trtwa tAlistit. Milan, September 20. . Dearest Son—l am ever the more confirmed in my maxim that it insight to have as little as possible to do with the great. I must say that the Government in question has too strictly in terpreted the letter I wrote you, and which has preionted to the blinister of Police other motives than those 'which realty originated it, since it is right to tell you that the Snit& Go vernment has written an angry letter to Colonel Brown. He (Colonel Brown), feeling himself much disquieted on this ac-.: count. made such. an application to Signor D. aceri, and to Signor Albertonio, that the former begged me to convey to the said Colonel Brown a letter of mine, which, bi a certoin way (is eats quai ;night instify him with his Government' from the too rigorous interpretation given to my firmer. letter. And after having-written and-re-written, through theater/ km of the said Signor emeri, draught, of such a letter to be "hewn, the copy which I enclose to youroaddress was fixed upon. You will likewise find the copy of a letter which the said Col. Brown desired from the..said Signor Albettosdo, who gave me the ac count contained in the letter' formerly addressed to you. To the honour of truth I have regarded what Cot. Brown said through the medium of Signor Albertonio as an act of friendship, to pre-. van him from being brought into any danger. Nor could I ever have imagined that such a thing mold have been of as much im portance as it has proved. However- that be, to facilitate the allaying of such a controversy, and to preserve amity with all, I have thought proper to second it, as you will perceive by the copy. They wis'aed me to declare that my first letter was the result of my own simple suspicion, and had no groand to rest upon; but this I would not allow, because the having named Colonel • Brown in the way I did, would have beat charged on me as a calumnious imputation ; and therefore you will see in my letter sent yesterday to hint (CoL Brown) that I mention my not having-direct conversation with hint, and derive my informa tion from what he caused * to be mid to use by Sig. Albertonio. Regulate yourself therefore in everything with the greaten pmdence, in order not to incur other annoyances and other dis sadsfactions, which can only produce evil to you; Your affectionate Father. SECOND DAY OF THE DEFENCE. HOUSE OF LORDS. At five minutes before ten o'clock this morning, the LORD CHANCELLOR entered the House, and prayers were read. Lords PONIONEY and SCARBOROUGH were excused on account of illness. • A person from the Treasury presented Copies of all the Communications which had passed between his Majesty's Government and the Queen since the month of June last, together with Accounts of the sums of Money advanced by- Governmeneto her Majesty.—Ordered to lie on the table. Counsel were then called in, and Mr. Bsouonam immediately resumed his Address. MR. BROUGHAM IN CONTINUATION. How came it to pass, said he, that with no want of care in the preparation of this case--that with the greatest display Of skill in the management—that with the boundless resources possessed and exercised by those who had to conduct the prosecution, there yet was a deficiency so remarkable in one `important respect, as to stnice every hearer upon the production of the witnesses. He meant the extraordinary want of ta lent, as to the.evidence selected to support the ease. In fact then, the Alps were crossed ; but one witness - was to be found ; and all the charges were to be 'sup ported by a single nymph. Wai it not extraordinary that from the Capital not one appeared—that not a single delegite came .from • her Majesty's biding place, and, least of all, from the place of her nativity. All that appeared against her on this side the Alps, was but a chambermaid or cellar-maid—the 'German the evil the utn ploy me he rejoi by this employ and it 4 great r dared rendere try whi That pe name, v were thi ' sion. 1 those fe going th that she