Star. — London, England, 1829-05-20 00:00:00

i of the property of Covent Garden theatre. The defend ants( Messrs. Kemble,Willet, and Forbes, were, together, instilled to 7 twenty-fourth shares; and Mr. Const was —duo entitled for life to the remaining 3 twenty •fourth . Ames, and . the reversion of these three shares were vested in persons claiming under the will of Mr. Mar tindale, to whom Mr. Const was executor. On the llth of Match, 1822, the plaintiff Harris and the defendants entered into the agreement which was the subject of the present lengthened litigation. The effect of this agree ment was, that the defendants, Messrs. Kemble,Willett, and Forbes should be considered as the Lessees of the Theatre for a term of ten years, to be computed retro spectively from the Ist of August, 1821, at a rent of 12,0001. Mr. Harris, the elder, the plainturs father, and who was proprietor of half the Theatre, and manager at a salary of 1.0001. per annum, died in October,lB2o. • and was succeeded in the property and management of the Theatre by the plaintiff. Previously to the execution ve of the agreement of 1822 various offers were made, and ultimately the defendants became the Lessees. at. the - rental of 12,0001. a year. The plaintiff then retired from . the Theatre, and the defendants assumed the manage. meat. In this management the defendants continued when Mr. Const filed his bill in 1823,,thereby stating , a certain deed, bearing date the 9th of Mevels, 1812, by which the then proprietors contracted with each other that the funds of the Theatre should be applied in pay-' • ment of certain specific debts until the whole of them were paid off. The bill of 1823 further stated, that many of such debts remained unsatisfied, and that the funds of the Theatre were then applied contrary to the proeieioas of the deed of 1812; and praying, therefore, that effect might be given to the deed of 1812. The result - of -this aux was the appointment of aßeceiver to the profits of thoTheatre, who bad ever since acted under the direct•On of the Court. This apPointmeet took place in February, 1824 1 and very shortly afterwards the defendants, Messrs. Kemble, Willett, and Forbes caused a letter to be written to the plaintiff), re , pudiating the agreement of March. 1822; and alleging that although the plaintiff was a party to the deed, • they (the defendants) had had no notice whatever of its existence. At the time of the appointment of the re ceiver, there remained unpaid of the debts minded to . be provided for by that deed a sum of 10,0001. The ponies to the deed of 1812 were Mr. Harris, tire fa ther; who was then possessed of twelve of the twenty ' fourth shares; the late Mr. John Philip Xemble then possessed of four twenty-fourth shares; • the late Mr. White then possessed of three shares; and the late Mrs. Martindale then possessed also of three twenty-fourth shares; and the plaintiff, who was pos . sessed of the two remaining twaityvfoarth . Abates.-- It s. as not until 1813 that the defendants, Willett • and Forbes, who had married two daughters of Mr. Wtrite,bec arise entitled to the three twenty-fourth shares, which in 1812 belonged to him. In April, 1824, the plaintiff filed the present bill for compelling the de • lendants Kemble, Willett, and Forbes, specifically t• rertorm the agreement , s ; l* the 11th of March, 11+22, and Mr. Court was made a party defendant to the bull. • These, his Lor Jship stated, were the main facts Of the case upon which ci e Bill proceeded: and the only • questi $ll now to be decided ss as, whether, baviig dub regard to all the circumstances of the case, this agree ment r•f 'March, 1822, could or could not be 110 b. tained ? The first point to be considered was as to • the deed of 1812. upon which Mr. Copses bill was founded. The defendants alleged that they had' no notice of the existence of the deed at the time the agree ment of 1822 was executed, and contended that it was the duty of the plain, iff to have apprised them of it. Whatever weight this might have in the case, cer tain it was that the defendants had no notice of it, and showed at- least a disposition of concealment on the part of the plaintiff. The next point, however, as to the rental of theatre, was by far the most important to be considered in all its beatings. The defendantsas to this point insisted that for want of more correct information they were compelled to make their calculations as to the rent which ought to be paid for the theatre, from statements and 'accounts furnished by the plaintiff, and purporting to be founded upon his Cif erience and knowledge of the affairs of the theatre; and it was alleged that these state ments and accounts were grossly erroneous. For the purpose of shoWing what was the nature of these re pte)entations certain martinis called Exhibits, i 4 G" and • H, " were produced, by which the profits of the theatre in the seasons of 1819 and 1820, and 1820 and 1821. were shown to be considerable. For these state mints it now turned out there was no-foundation in fact; and instead of there being a profit of 7001. or 80(11: a considerable loss had been expersenced. This was the direct misrepresentation of which the defendants complained, and upon which they mainly founded their opposition to the prayer of the bill. The defen dants also rested their defence upon a, letter proved as " Esbibit L," written by the plaintiff - to Mr. &imam, far the purpose of being connnuoicated to Mr. Harrison, acting is the part of the defendants. In this letter it was stated theft the total amount of the receipts during the eleven seasons was 991,8111. being an average per season of 82,6501. and the plaintiff added, that be had no d)ubt one-third of this sum might be accounted as profit; and was sure. if the sums were cakulated erbich had been paid (independently of the working of the theatre). he should be fully borne out in his asset • deafly this letter, as well as the exhibits G"and•• H," before mentioned, the defeidaets alleged they were sir ceived, for although it appeared by Mr. Braudoe's (the • Treasurer's) accoutre, that the receipts-Joe the eleven seasons did amount to 991,8111. ybt of this bum 86,2891. bad been paid over to the actors for benefits, and ought not therefore to have been included. It was said, in answer to these allegations of the defendants, that this was the statement which appeared in the books of account kept by Mr. B. and that these were equally • open to the defendants as to the plaintiff. This was per fectly true, bat it was to be recollected that the plaintiff, by constant reference tp them, was sequential with them, and that the defeedantstad had no such opportunities.— that the accounts were most complicated, as must se cassava, be the case in so large a concern, and that under such circonntancee it was easy to mislead. That - @misrepresentations had been made was indisputable, and the question, therefore, was, whether it was competent for the plaintiff, under such 'circumstances. to compel a performance of the agreement? When the bill was filed, only two years of .tribe lease bad run, and therefore eigi.t tears yet remained of this disad 'antis:ars lease. Were the defendants compelled to abide by elicit contract, to ptit up with the losses they bad thus sustained, through the misrepresentations of theApiaintiff? The evidence of Mr. Harrison was most clear, diatiuct, and positive ) and in ao way, astir as he .._i• - 1 ii± 0 ...... )7i d : — 1 W DITELLiGENCE. (' , co res- .-1 • - - ---- • t: z . , .. . ~ ~w e ' CHANCERY, NAT 19. Ifi .• , _. ' T 11,TIINATIZ.••••NIDDIDIENT. ri.. ''.:. ' 4,1 ' Aitilp . ' . l . IDIBLZ AND WNW. ... t 1; - • • • in deliveritig the Judgment et. ,- n , is.loog litigated ease, went through diiiiiiiinikfilhigiti; as chltailed at the bar. The plaintiff in Match, 18V2, was iMtitled to 14 twenty•fourth shares eotilduaderstaita the ease, had hien satisfectoray eon. tradicted. In that evidence Mr. Harrison distilled!, stated, that the plaintiff repeatedly assured him (Mr. Harrison) that the theatre bad Made profits to thi ex tent of 10,0004 in each of the seasons 1819. 1820, and 1821, and, in consequence, about 20,0001. of the old debt of the theatre bad been paid off, and very little new debt contracted. This, therefore, was clearly a misrepresentation. and in no way had the plaintiff been able satisfactorily to meet it. The third main point upon which the defendants bad rested their cask was the box of Sir Edmund Antrobus. In September, 1817, the plaintiff and his father had assigned a moiety of this box to the late Sir Edmund Antrobus (the other moiety being let to his Royal Highness the Duke of Gloucester for alternate weeks), for a sons of 2.62.51. This sale had not been communicated to the other pro prietors of the Theatre. but it was represented to them that the moiety of the box was let.to Sir Edward An ; trobus for 21 years, at an annual rent of 2101. which was paid by the Duke of Gloucester. The plaintiff and his father before him accounted with the proprietors for the rent of 2101. as if paid by Sir E. Antrobus, when, in fact, it was not so paid ; and on the occasion of the agreement 0f1822,t he plaintiff continued to represent the box as let to Sir E. Antrobus at a rent of 2101. This was lan underhand proceeding, which had not been denied, and for which there was no excuse. A direct fraud had been 'committed upon the proprietors, and Mr. Harris the father, and Mr. Harris the son; well knew - diets las action. It was apart of the agreement s .that thittent of 2101. together with other rents, should be received by the plaintiff. There was another transaction as to Lady Holland's boz,which was of a very similar character,and added to the rest of the transaction, shOwed ihe system of deception which bad been pursued. On the part of the plaintiff it was stated, as a reason for not allowing the defendants to depart from the agreement.th at a great number of injudicious and injurious alterations had I been made in the Theatre during the management of Messrs. Ketnblei' Willett, and Forbes, and that the value of the property was thereby.greatlr reduced. It was also said that the interests of the Theatre had greatly suffered in other ways, and that if the agreement was not performed, it would be a great loss to the plaintiff and other proprietors. This might or might not be the fact. If it were true that the property had been thus deteriorated in the hands of the defendants, it was mat ter for compensation elsewhere, and was no ground for adherence to the agreement of 1829. If such loss had actually been sustained, the plaintiff knew his remedy was elsewhere. His Lordship said be believed he bad now gone through the whole case. He had spared no pains in goiqg through the whole of the complicated accounts and details in order thoroughly to understand the case. He had done so because he had found him self compelled to differ widely Eton) the opinion of the Vice Chancellor, from whose judgment this appeal had been brought. He much regretted that he was com pelled to arrive at a different determination; but view ing the facts in a different light, he was compelled to perform what he deemed his duty, and reverse the judgment of the Vice Chancellor. His Honour had pronounced an elaborate judgment, and bad stated most fully the reasons upon which he had-founded his deci sion. These reasons he had had the advantage of read ing and attentively considering, and after seriously weighing all the facts of the case, he could arrive at no other conclusion than that the *greement of 1822 could not be specifically performed. 'As this was a very im portant matter, be should carefully draw up . the decree, by which all parties would be guided. ViRLLIZILRY N. WELLESJ.IT. Mr. HORNE presented a Petition on behalf of Mr. Long Wellesley, praying that the furniture in Draycot House !night be allowed to rivulet there, until the. guardians of. the children bad been appointed.' The Leatned Counsel stated his belief, that the Master had made a report on the subject, and had been of opinion that the furniture on Draycot was the property of the , 'infants; and the consequence of that report was, that, a bill had been filed, in order that the Court Might de cide the point. All that Mr. Wellesley now desired was, that the furniture in the house should not be at present disturbed. _ _ BLAMES also spoke in support of the petition. Mr; Simms, on behalf of the children, was only de. siren's that there should be an oprortunity of lett►ng Draycat House. If that could be done, there would be no objection to the petition. It was finallyattanged that the prayer of the petition should be granted upon this understanding. . Mr. Hostig stated, that the motion which he was in structed to make for Mr. Wellesley, was to dissolve an injunction, which had been obtained. some time since, restraining Mr. Wellesley from cutting,down timber on , the estate. Perhaps, hots ever, it would be saving tine, and be better tor all parties, now that the season had gone by for ctsting tim e lier, that the motion should be postponed trail Nov. or Dec. lie was prepared with the motion at this moment; but if. the injunction were dissolved, it could not be acted upon at ti e present season.. By agreement of all parties, theiefote, this motion was postponed sine die. Another petition in the same matter, relative to costs, was postponed until Saturday, the parties not bring row prepared to bring it forward. It had been at first pro posed (and so was determined until the appearance of Mr. Sugden in Court), that both the.petitions should be postponed as well as the motion, until Salturday ; but at the earnest solicitation of Mr. Surinam the petition as to the Dram* furniture, and the mottos-west brought on and chspcsed Friday, her Gra c e the. Duchess of Si. ALBAN 4 s gate a Public Breakfast at her elegant Retreat, Holly Ldge, Highgate, to upwards of 100 persons of high distinction. The company began to arrive about two o'clock. The Breakfast consisted of de earliest productions of the season. laid ~ u tin a most siinapufaus manner.— The fineness of the day, the beauty of the Ladies, the magnihrent view, all gave the idea of Faiiy Land and Enchantment. -Foiday and 'Saturday experiments Were made be tween Liverpool and Holyhead, by asking a question and obtain ing an answer; and both bates she answer was received back in lase than one minute—viz..on Friday, in 33 seconds, and on Sater day, in 59 seconds. as observed by two stop-watches at Liverpool M Altrroarka justly hdmired Ttagedy of Biensi was performed at the Reading 'Theatre on Friday night. for the first time, to an elegant and crowded audience, and went off with great mktg. The play was to be repeated on Monday (yesterday), under the patronage of J. B. Moser, Esq. M.P. Mundy afternoon, about three i.'clock, a Gentle man bolding high rank in the army, alighted from his horse (a valuable bay gelding, for which be gave eighty guineas) at White. ball, where he bad business, and gave the animal in charge tea mas who, on sown him ahem. stepped forward, and begged leave to earn a few pence by bolding the horse. He was not gone many minutes ' but on his return found the horse was gone, and was informed by some parsons passing that the man whom be had mutilated rode re with the seimal in leas than a minute after be loft him. The owner of the horse immediately took a coach, and proceeded to How•steet, where be gave information of his loss, aid Sir R. Bums sent Taunton, jut. off to pursuit of the thief. A youth of the name of Butler, who bad then for , trimly apprentice to Messrs. DOWMI3IO, whose manufactory was de stroyed by fits on Sunday, was yesterday esandoed at Queers square. upon aospidon of having set fire to the premises. There was in erect evidassee against the prisoner, and be was tense queenly reasan6ol for further examinadm. • TIM FANCY: • ' ' . - •- FIGHT errwszN HARRY 30NRS (THE, SAILOR • BOY), AND GEORGE WATSON (THE BRISTOL YOUTH), FOR FIFTY POUNDS A-SIDE. This will between Jones and Watson, which has ex-. cited some interest in the Fancy circles, took place yes terday. on Harpendon Common, Herts, the same spot on which Josh Hudson and Shelton fought aboet six years back. The weat' , er was delightful, the turf iw excellent order, and the beaks indulgent, so that every thing combined to render the sport agreeable. The as sensblage r f amateurs, too, though not numerous, was highly respectable. led not less than six carriages and four, in al slap up style,* gave unusual splendour to the scene. Among others we noticed the vulture of two sons of Neptune. from the coast of Hampshire, staunch patrons of the fist, who travelled no less than one hun dred miles to "rime% as it turned out, the triumph ol .he Sailor Boy, and who, the mo.nent the action was over, set sail, under a press of canvas, to the port from whence they came, the flag of victory 'flyiog at their topmast head. The attendance of the more bumble ad mirers of the fistic art was also creditable, and good order and a square fight gave a new impetu. to the character of the Ring. Jones veined at Kitt's end. near Bsinet, and Watson at Hendon—both were in excellent condition. Watson had the advantage in height, length, and weight, but Hairy had "the pull" in experience and science. The weight of Watson Was lOst. 121bs. that of Jones 10. t. 4lbs. Jones, who was titikeo:to the field in a swell drag drawn by four greys, was accompanied by his friend Tote Spring. the worthy host of' the Castle Tavern; while Watson came for ward under the no less Jae; to - able auspices of Tom Illcher, the ex governor of the same . 'house. Watson is. in fact. a nephew of Tom Belcher, and is (me of the Bristol School; but he never before exhibited in the prize ring—he is a b ee young man, and coming from e good stock he had his ad mirers, and there were tree takers of 2 to 1 and 7 1 0 4. At one o'clock both entered the arena. The Sailor under convoy of Spring and Young Dutch SAM—Ma son claiming the of f ices of Jem Burn (his brother-in law), and Tom Oliver. The deck was soon cleared lot action; and the umpires and referee having been chosen, the colours of the belligerents were blended on the stake =Harry's, as usual, Navy Rae, with white spats, and . Watson's a brilliant Behber. Oliver won the toss f aoice of position ; and, of course, placed the back-of his man towards the - sun, which shone with meridian splendour. On being stripped, the frame of Watson showed some good muscular points—his arms were long, and his height . gave him a commanding aspect. The Sailor Boy was in excellent fighting trim. and his herculean figure never showed to more adv•istAge. THE FIGHT. Rama 1. Jones being a stranger to the style of his opponent, with good judgment waited for his attack; and, after a tees matneuvres, Watson let fly with his left. This was neatly stopped by Harry, when Watson planted his right on his rib.. Harry smiled ; and drawing back a little, and seeing an opening. he jumped in. and jobbed slightly with his left. IN another effort of the same sort be was stopped. Watson again put in his right-banded body bit, and this brought them to close quarters. Watson let fly his larboard grappling. but Harry was as quick and more active with ids oar. board, and grasping Watson by his upper works, bit up, and poured in a few grape shot from his left, which told well—both broke away. and after a few long shots in &VIM of Harry, which told severely on Wataon's " figure bead," and raised sundry .bumps on his us fruntis, a spirited rally took place, and counter bits were exchanged ; Harry as quick as lightning threw in his right as well as his left.— In the end he caught his man prettily with his left, and then rushing to a close, threw him in admirable style; bringing his nob with great forest* the ground. First blood was declared in this round tram Watson's forehead. 11. Harry tried hisleft, but was neatly stopped. Watson, active, hit with his left, but was stopped. Some good scientific moves fel. lowed, in which the stops were mutual; at last Watson went in to fight. Harry, awake, met him with a left-handed job, and in the close again threw him. 3. Harry popped in a left-handed job en Watson's Hest eye; bit for bit, but exaKutien in favour of Harty. In a rally which fol lowed Watson was bit down—(first knock-down blow In favour of Harry, thus deciding the first two events). 4. Harry jobbed well with his right, and Watson's dexter ogle looked blue. A rally followed, in which slight bits Were exchanged, both down. • - 5. Watson tried his left, but was stopped; a sharp rally is favour of Harry, who planted right and left, and in the dose Watson was thrown. 6. Watsowesata op bkedtng at the now; Harry jobbed with his kft. A rally in favour of Harry, who bit beavdy tight and kft. Its the claw bads down. 7. Harry jobbed twice with his left, and broke away. Ditto re -pealed; and in the ebb Watson was thrown. 11. Harry popped in a abp on Watson's bread basket. Watson hit open banded with his bit, and in a rally was sever* jobbed. In the close Harry bit up, and Watson fell on his bates, Harty Walking away as fresh as a rose. • 9. Watson rushed in, but hit open banded. In the close, how ever, be net Harry down, amide the cheers of his friends. 10. £ abort rally, which ended iu Harry butting Watsoe with his nob on the nose, and then hitting him right and left, he dropped him. the claret coming freely from his smeller. . • 1. A good fighting rally, buds down. It Harry jobbed with his left, and then rushing to i iicee, hit up. Watson fought • with him, but ; and in the close Wanton was thrown. 13. Watson planted his right slightly on Harry's nob; but in re turn was severely punished, right and left. Harry, kit hint with mathematical precision, and at tastier fell again as the Worshippers of Juggernaut, his nose distilling blood in quarterns. 14. Harry rushed in and floored his antagonist. LS. Watson sorely distressed and Harty as fr.•sh as a two year aid." Harry saw his advantage, and kit away right and kit. Wat. sun made a stand, bait was all abroad, and was thrown. 16. Watson, amidst loud cries from his friends, fought first, arid caught Harry slightly with his ri. ht on the larboard jaw; but in tiying to repeat the compliment fell. 17. Watson went in wildly. Harry all alive, fell back and bit up severely. Watson made an drun to rally, but received heavily and fell weak. 19. Harry jobbed heavily with his left twice, and threw Wail's a erose.buttnek. 19. Harry again jobbed right and left (both of Watson's peepers In mourning), and then dining, threw him beastly. 90. Watson tried his right. but was sheet. Harry /tinned, sod rushing in, jobbed him in good style, and pursuing hint to the repea t dropped him in good style by the ropes. 41. Harry again hit left and right en Watsoa's pruboscls, drawing additional claret, and in the end be again Booted him weak. Cl. Harry had it all his own way. Watson tried his best. but it was no ass--be was outfought, and to the close was thrown heavily. .23. Harry jobbed with his left, and betted with his nob, 'and then planting his left heavily, peeled the bark from Watson's rose. After lame further hitting, Watson was dropped. It wag sow seen that Watson bad not a chance. The . punish. meat was one way—Watson only stood by to receiVe ; and what between jobbing and butting be bad set " the ghost of hope:" still he was brought up weak and distressed till the thirtieth round, when his most sanguine friends admitted it was in vain to prolong the contest, and victory was reluctantly acknowledged to be in favour of Harry, who may be said to have won *idiom a setatch--be bad not, its fact, a mark worth recording in the fie; and with the exception of a few discolouratious in the neck, from the struggles for the fall, he had no visible mark. He was as fresh when he left of as when he began, while Watson was taken out of tke ring in a piteous state. The fight lasted 39 minutes and some seconds; this analog the fifth battle which Junes has won within the last eleven months— namely, those with Ned &ocknsan, Barmy Aaron, Tom Reediri Frank ittdiasad, and Watson. Rill AIUM...- . l . hiG fight was not peculiar for novelty. Watson, on atipping; 'showed several good petbonal points—he is anatomically handsome, and seemed ca pable cf much; in length of reach and height he ha 4 the decided advantage of Jones—but he is o touh4 hitter, and his right hand appeared to be his favourite engine. He has no proper ideit of tactics, but be nsa-: nitrated thosongh . game. Thai lifter quality, however, availed his little, for he only . bild'the .fortitude to'-es4 dine without the judgment. to administer 'pnoishosvut4 The battle never was dcipisfaLt,4ool,,toub,sbo.lead) ldlept it VD the Math: tie ihmii.efi 'with* toy ti. sltile math, nor waste at sari - period of the tomes ft. tigurd. The friends .of Wawa attributed Vie d e. Ci+ioe of hit •defaat.to his nagleethsg rib a 6„ t to fight-in, aid to fight &awhile Mil ill t h e ' abr.' *hes his strength ass sot hispaired; hal oerewi opinion is, that although sae are convinced thatehatoot his °sly:chance. yet we are - Itkelviewt•to, shadeh eo did attempt it be had always the worst of th e ph !. He did make some good endeavours towards the 4:1 0 „_ but Isis power was then estinct. Watson was can oat alibering almost sobbing frowscheltrin,anda ssity blind from punisholOot—he was taken to 26 Albu m . IJonec walked out of the ring. and proceeded to Lo eb ith his friends. ' One consideration regarding the bank, which i s t o some moment, is worthy of notice—it was, yeast no. vinced, a ialeind a squint flak. THE SECOND PION% , .i Cozies threw op Ms hat to fight fur a pane; bet Miasmas was found roc him. Peter Crawley and the IPhenamenan Sant tee* contend 74 . te a purse, foe Which Nike Davis, the Bristol baker, wad Nod Nam peeled, They twilit seven rounds, and Mike hating put k r i s sot weep doggiest hitt. hen Ned cut of time. Ned rrceised IL* the parte. and Mike strutted of a 'kers ulth the 61. in by p t very well pleased with the reward of Ma labour. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. • - NEWMARKET SECORriPRING MEETING. T884041r, MAY is. Match SO Yaws. t.T.C. Mr. Vansistan's The Drer, art 71b ••• Mr. Dilly's BansardoeSst 71b ... Woo by two lengths. Handicap Sweepstakes of to nova, each. T.Y.C. Lord Jersey': Viritartney, 5 yra, Si tali ... .... 1 Mr. ficephsaaErislare, 4 y re, 7st bib -t• „„ t Mr. Payne. r G.% .: yes. itst to i# , 4 ." 4Di .• .• ' ' ..., • / . ti i Mt. 51011% s filly. 4 yrs, 7st . ... •• ••• 4 9 u: Of Richmond s TM Alderman, arid, Sit 12Ib ••• 1 • • • .• --x,s,carsAcntik. Handicap Sweeps ta k e s 4lu Ban !Wk. T.T.E. Mr. Gremile's Harlequin, 4 yrs • 7st 7lb - ... Lord Sefton's Bobadella. 4 yrs, Sae lib el.••• . 2 Mr. Walker's Dicky /Jolus,l3 yrs, Set bib ••• • . ••• 1 D. of niChniood's Guinan, 5 yrs, See I elb ... a Won by two lengths. ' Fifty Pounds fora yrs oist colts, Sit 7lb ; fillies Sot 44. it.* Mr. Vandttares Magawiska .. ___ f ... I Lord Itigrrmones c Dy WhaSebum, of Ihcbtuond% Scimetar • a .- s Steen tubers started, but were not placed— Won by a leech. MOIIDAT MAT 18--(FUSTIIIM CORIUM? PAATICULAAS). Sir M. Wand's Jubn de kin, en 11/b. .best Lord J. Plurey's Lancastrian, Sit 7pb, Y.C. ttaa, b tt. N'ort.by a Wok: 7as 4 age Juba de Bart. Ifsadieup Sweepstakes of 10 son. wadi, toe time yrs eld sal sp. visrds A.F. Suwetby's Coroner, 4 yrs, Tit 6th ». ... Mr. O'Coonor's Damao, S yrs, 7st 1 I re Mr. Grevi.le's Godiswk. 6 yes. sst Was I Mr. Mouldswersh's Flush, 4 yrs, Tst sub Woo by two Isogths—thse paid--S to 4 agst Coronc--Sts 4 oo Goshawk. At the sloe of the seeming she Setting was as fames-a. Dhow. • I to 2 apt Lord Ruler's Patron (taken) - 6 to 1 apt Lord Sedan's Morris Dancer 2 to 1 apt Mr. Medea Motto Mt 14.t0 1 apt Lord Grosvenor's Blowy 16 to 1 apt Lord Spensonti Could oolt 17 to 1 apt Lord Cadondirdes Ilyagnoile calt 25. to 1 apt Mr. Dilly's Minima . 30 to 1 apt Lord Ski. Prisicrigepers Oast 5 to 1 apt Lord liseter's Yarns 5 to 1 astst Lord Ezeter's Green Mantis... 11 to 2 apt Mr. liodsdale'r aotdde •7 to 1 apt Lord 6. Cavendish's Moose Illy 20 to 1 asst Sir M. Wood's Leo . • POLICE (Fifaii EIIC E. lOW., REIM . . , Mary Ann Norris, seventeen yeses of age, was charged ebb having stolen nine smoothing irons. late was ;feat stead sad admitted the charge, but stated that :banger obliged 'het to k wises only twelve years of age she bad been 'aniseed, mad ever since promoted tier living upon the lowa, of which, isofoows, was *meted, sad would be Odd of ats asylum; heals her wilt* yours to roma else she failed, and bolas wad* to gat sal . abeam dm MliMiakted the &boy. )Ir. Masses—lf you are sinner VU endeavour to panties place of refuse he pee. 'The est mM she was siker% man Mil the Maglnitillensimaded bet, ist order to carry lis femme haw non • • • - Adam lkarAlkg. of Portnaan4quarre. was brought up to have an artier of MINI= made upon IS Elizabeth Ilaintsta deposed that she lived is servant with Me. lbw. mod Amin was the father of the ddM. which was born ia. dapeetpbsl. Mr. Fielder. the defendant's 9aitiser, asked V ii ware.* fall grown child?' Mr. /bane. she sorrow who delivered bse isid k appeared so to him,and the mother told hiss that apestweantel Cooper was its father ; bat she added, that the plask4aws wised her to father it upaa some era who was better able as pay for its maintenance. The complaisant sow &Mod tfau Cower ms the father. Mr. Rawlings, clerk of the parish Si St. Martin's /a thefts/ass denied that the complainant had ever got such Wales. Mr. liltisinott. sated the cualislailtaat if she Weft positive that the.defentiant was the father? Complainant—Yes, quite positive. Mr. Fielder said he would 'prove that it could sot be the me, a Mr. Elmer, kis wife, and Madame Seguin, his •niother.iedaw, ea sided itt Paris from August, till March. lain, dense tr;edi time Mr: Elmer staid la Paris,except for two wombs that he wen into l'iandy on i sheeting elcurtioo. Madame Seguin deposed to that fact.: Mr. Rawliap said the defendain, Meted of being in Picard/ might kin come to England; The complailiaat said that this was the second time she bedlam pregnant by as defendant. A tuns discussion here followed about the age of the child, 04 other circuantances, %Al& induced the Magistrates to pivot the decision far three maths, when it was ordered to he brssstt on foe a second hearing. . . WORSHIP—STREET. • Yesterday Charles Mniiigas, an elderly auto, was brat& before Mr. TWIVOILI I / 2 Iran the watchbonse at &oke Newingten.eknird with an attempt to violate the person of' Mina Thermo% • elad only tea years of age, and also with robbing bar of a ebewl..—llia pri.oner was comniatted for the rubbery sod assault. Yesterday T. Morfey, who has been ezandned several dawn ibis office, on sosiiento of setting to Westminster Abbey. vs fin a 11 Y " °1 ‘ 11.41-1" 44rmilkispeartiamee to-wenn his,- -.ttil,l ' eWaiiigersaiged. • • M All LBO ROUGH-ATRIUM ::-.lCairoldlyallrosalbstaanhg,lisasobtlitgioLarlitisliohigotank., isenshaw, the landlord ul the King's Mad pablie-hoon,Allsona. street. The prisoner being drink ant rims% was ejected trio the house, and soon afterwards be wad./ as ar r eitussity was spa son was leavieg slaaMont as insbar r fed he Oas . some wool IN W. Kaaba w's Wilma& Me was cadmiaised. - • THANES POUCH --7 Z • T. dicta's: and G. Hide were brought to this Mee charged lath uttering .counterfeit crown pikes. Vo Satprday averting tbelt‘ were and' woman 'Stored the home of Mr. Want, the Arms, in A resdel.street,and in payment for a" of Oka"' a counterfeit cram' slicer, which Mr. Wand re 'Nadu take cal then paid for the gill tritirsispence and went away. lobo Omial• an Officer, followed:them at a distance, and saw them joined Of two oche/ worms; they alipmeeeded towards Widthwise SAPP and Adams entered a tobacconist's amp in Bridge.eotim, sad slur he came out, Gasisin altered, and found be bad passed a Wow* piece in payment for some tobacco. °whin them followed thou! 1 Lambeth, and at the house of Mr. Bishop, the Two Sawyero._! Churcb.street, the prisoners and Inc el the women enseroa..!: drank some gin. Guide followed, and found they bad Pal"' anotbor crown piece. He then mixed the two nus.,whes sea la them. hung another bad crown sway, bet it was fiend. 1 Bishop. The women, who' ace the beents,op !Berideale escaped in the coulomb:1: Mr. Baehaali s reimpied tae ,prim e simtil hiday neat.—The public UV not put to mess in P.- . prinecedon of cases or tidiralt" 'lcli wq dene by the Selieltetonh t Mint. Them countdrisit pieced hate a lair appearance on a «off view, asuisonnd well ; but may be detected an dose inspects e. LA M BILTH.STBBET.. Two yowl, mar. named Msdiegass ant Grogesig. were 46116 with steslingshree pair of wiiifiow sashes, from issroor_ the property of Mr. William Gray, 'Slio peeprletTa r tite e psdb m s• Arnu,'Stepnuy.—Thry were afaudirnitice ulut• Looms: aims* arl.robaboll b Jam Mane, die Protioder 4% *las h Talk Sai. e ' Eraslda :WO dml= .M... 1• bn...M..... '., • A eel lIARDII A boil • ,r A' . A 9ki . %lulus of With Mit • With mill and all re( Groinds. and Meat • • A,•AI • inti l a •• -• "whole ‘. i llllllPetit . Pariicl 414 it • licketth • . . FLEE . ' COILCII . • TOW . • • ;.- . At Os , Late 1; r: .. *taste A VEI • Cased w planned • Welly ae • COMIIII6III An En . contains Attiellk Mate., 1 partly wr :aid crop : . End • • I • • Lot ' • Brick K .sad Aro . • ~• • • Tlie 1 d • Olga, ' aid at a Tibi • Read, a • NW ; •' East <4 Old SIM Dorking 'and Hei RIN Mal' be. 11.111 T rotresid , mil s d an goitecm, Itecrsait 'trier I . • sa habil much V Sold Ciwipsi ..asd • Pi %oder ' of the ' W Trikirvial Appftli bag: ....__ - that pq special) able. • Hrerbs it 1.4.0 .aDd a" Miff i • Ilia and t it *tram, Peony • milly-st • Evans, Fleet-a yards, Pabri *ad th it. • fie • Voodoo a. TA DL iste — lu — d; " 14. die obi ..~ . 1 '• . • J • . & .. • , t