Star. — London, England, 1829-06-13 00:00:00

LAW INTILLIGENCE. 1 . • COURT OF KING'S BENCH, GenAwmat, Jews 11. (before Lord Torresess end Comma Juries.) Vacs V. sow. This was an action for breach of covenant. It ap peared that the defendant was at one business as a bookbinder, and received the plaintiff as his appren. tic; it a premium of 19 guineas; shortly after, the defendant made his business over to a person named Williams, who sent the plaintiff away to his father with a mote, saying that be bad Ao fOrther occasion for his services, as be bad two other apprentices, who did all he wanted. It was then discovered that the defendant, in staling over the business to Williams, had neglected to assign over to him the plaintiff's indentures. T he plaiitiff was afterwards apprenticed to& waterman.— The defence attempted to be set up was, that the plain tiff's beilth would not bear the confinement of a book binder's business, and that it was on that account he left. • Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 19 guineas.,. • WILL AND ANOTHIR P. IBUTCHIDI. This was an action on a bill of exchange for 4001. of which the plaintiffs were indorsees • , the defendant the acceptor, and his son the drawer. The handwriting of the parties having been proved, .. Mr. CAI/MILL I for the defendant, set up a defence that the plaintiffs had given no consideration for the bill, and that it was given to Messrs. Benson and Co. from whom the plaintiffs received it as a security for a loan of 4001. which they were to hold till the mortgage deed of a fourth part of the ship Vanillia, belonging to Butcher, jun. could be drawn up and given to them, but that they retained this bill without the defendant's con sent after they bad obtained the mortgage deed, as a security for a farther sum of 500/. they advanced to Butcher, jun.—To support this defence, Mr. Butcher, jun. the drawer, having been released S by his father, and his clerk, r. Rooks, were called. They stated such to be the terms on which the bill was given, Mr. Benson not liking to lend Mr. Butcher, jun. the money without Kline security till the mortgage deed on the ship could be drawn up. The first witness, on his cross-examination by Sir J. SCARLET?, at first stated that on the day the deed was executed Mr. Benson lent him an additional 2901. for which he merely gave a check for 3001. on his hinter, but on being shown a check of his for 3901. dated on the day the deed was executed, said he would not swear that he gave any check for the loan of the 2904 He stated also that he gave no security for that hiathind denied that the first loan was on the security of the bill of exchange, and the second on that of the mortgage. He stopped payment ! few days after. The check he gave had never been presented for payment. Mr. Benson was then called on behalf of the plaintiffs to contraJict this evidence. He accused Mr. Butcher, jun. of pet jury, and denied the truth of his statement in every particular. He stated also that be met the defendant a few days before the bill became due, and, that he then told him he should not be able to meet it; that be had not .501. in the house; and that he feareattie must go to prison. The payment of a check for upwards of 6001. ad vanced to Mr. Benson on this bill and other securities by the plaintiffs was also proved. Irdid not appear that. the defendant or his son asked to have the bill re de-' livered to them when they gave Mr. Benson the lion gaftet deed. ord TENTARDIN left it to the Jury to say whetbit H the ill was given on condition that it should by of no avail upon the execution of the mortgage? and then whether the plaintiffs had given value for the bill? for if they. had they would be entitled to recover. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs—Damages, 4091. DAWSON V. MORGAN. The defendant in this action was the acceptor of a bill of exchange, which, when due, was dishonoured. The plaintiff was an indorser of the bill, against whom an action bad been brOught, and who hadlieen compelled to pay the bill, the amount of which, however; lie after- wards recovered. Toe plaintiff now brought this action to recover the costs of the judgment that bad been sued oot.against him in consequence of the defendant not having paid the bill. It was entirely a question of law for the decision of his Lordship; and Mr. Pauisan, who was for the plaintiff, stated that he believed it bad never been distinctly raised before. TbsLearnedCciunsel quoted the case of Jones v. Brook, in 4th Tatum, page 464, and of Smith o. Dudley, in Fourth Term Reports, page 691, in support of the plaintiff's right to maintain the action. The formal proof necessary toaaise the question having been gives, Lord TINTERDZW said that he .was of opinion that the plaintiff could not recover, and directed him to be nonsnited ; but gave him leave to move the Court of King's Bench to enter a verdict for.the amount claimed. The plaintiff was then called. PASCALS. V. HONSIAT AND ASHMOSS. This action was brought by the plaintiff, a sail-maker, to recover 2171. for repairs done to the ship Georgianai• of which the defendants. were owners. Honley had become:a bankrupt, and the action was defended solely for Mr...Ashmore. The defence attempted to be lei up was, 'fiat Mr. Ashmore had given notice to the plaintiff to discontinue the repairs; but this failing, a verdict was given for the plaintiff for. the amount claime6, prin cipkl and iiiterest. r. .IitkEROGATIVE 'COURT, JUNE ts. Before Sir Joa■ NACHOLL. 'LILLeY v. LILLiT. ... • This Was a question as to the validity.of a will exe: cuted in October, 1827, by Charles Edward Lilley, de. ceased. The will was propounded on behalf of the deteised's mother, and was opposed by his widow, on whose part it was pleaded that the deceased had de. stroyed the will in question and died intestate. The case now came before the Court on the admission of the allegation tendered on behalf of the widow, in which it was pleaded that the deceased' married in September, 1827, against the consent of his mother and brother ' and that they subsequently endeavoured to alienate his •affec tint* ftont,his wife, and misrepresented her conduit, sad that the will was executed under impressions founded, on those misrepresentations, bet that afterward the deceased became cone s mced of the injustice he bad , done his waesitiit:hecli the, will, from his banker's, in whoa hands it. was deposiutd,and destroyed it iodic ptereoce of his wife. Dr. Lusnrioron, on behalf of the party setting up the will, objected to the admission of that part of the allegation which referred to the conduct of the da ceased's mother and brother subsequent to his merrier, as wholly unnecessary in determining the only questsed at huge, and delsolated to incur expense, which should, be avoided, as the deceased's property only amounted', to 3,5001. Mr. Doneow was heard in support of the allegltion, which the Court directed Gould be admitted, after being tefornsoland' abridged in some particular parts, witririons AND °Titans o. STIIVSIISI. This was 2 question as to the will of Ann petrels, of Cleat 0 mond.street,..se,l4 died in November, 1858, at tie age of 91 years, lear(us replier/10 the eibeeit of between 70.0001. and 75.0001. The bulk of the pro.l perry was left under tbe will to Messrs.Whitmore, Par.' moo, and Tamp the deflators named in it, and the will was opposed by Mr. Stevens, who was the second cousin of the deceased and the next of kin. The allegation propounding the will.wns opposed on the ground that it contained a testamentary history of the deceased which was wholly irrelevant, if the subse quent articles of the allegation, pleading the execution of the will, were proved. The COURT admitted the allegation, but referred it back to the Counsel to consider whether any part could be compressed. ORINDAL GRIMM. This was a question as to the will of Thomas Grinds]. deceised, of Broad-stteet, Bloomsbury, and late of Judd• place, Somers'•towa. The defense& died at ap advanced age, leaving property to a loge amount, and the will was opposed by Charles E. Grindal and Thomas Stone Grindal, the nephews of the deceased and his nest of kin, who were disinherited under the will, and on whose behalf - it was pleaded that the deceased was of unsound mind, and under the influence and controul of Mr. Start Giindal at the period the Will was executed. Objections were taken to several of the statements contained in the allegation given in on behalf of the nephews; and, after hearing the Counsel it both sides. the Court directed the allegation, generally, to be re formed. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Juraz 12. James Shepprd, who said he resided at Gainsford, in the North of E ngland, was opposed by Messrs. Coral and Bastard, seedsmen. of "Bristol. The insolvent was declared a bankrupt in 1825, but bad not obtained his certificate. In Dee. 1827. be in formed the opposing creditors that he bad some tam to dispose of, and they forwarded him a bill of exchange for 701. on the understanding that the tares were to be shipped to them immediately from Liverpool. Some time elapsed, and the tares not having arrived. the opposing creditors applied to the insolvent. and he then. stated, that the ship in which the tares were sent, had been driven out to sea. in a storm, and the tares so se verely damaged that he sold them for a mere nominal sum. Messrs. Core and Bastard ;ben _demanded the bill of exchange. but the insolvent, having obtained cash for it, offered to send other tares; but the opposing creditors refused to accept them, and arrested the in solvent. The insolvent was unable to produce any evi dence of the shipment of the tares. The COURT observed that the case was pregnant with suspicion, and remanded the insolvent for six months. Mr. Lewis Bernard Sapio. of Covent Garden Theatre, was this day declared entitled to the benefit of the Act. and ordered to be forthwith discharged, no opposition appearing. OLD BAILEY SBSSIONS, June 12. NEW COURT. Refers Mr. Sergeant Alan& ROSIRIT ST • ESUALE SERVANT._ _ Mary Ann Bro w n, alias Ryan, alias Donaldson, was indicted for stealing in the dwelling house of Mr. Geo. Wheeler a coat, various articles of plate, and other property, value 101. and upwards, his property, and a purse containing three sovereigns, the property of Miss Ellen' C lar ke. The prosecutor stated that he lives in Orme•sq* gate, Bayswater, and is a surgeon. The prisoner was his servant five or six weeks previous to the 29th of April, when the robbery was committed. Oa the day last named, she left his house in a very sudden manner, and almost immediately after she left he discovered that not only the articles named in the indictment but other pro. petty had been taken away. Her abrupt departure caused suspicion to rest upon the prisoner; in fact so other parson,.in his opinion, could have committed the robbery. Part of the property had been since discovered, and would be produced by other witnesses. Mr. Sergeant Attalla—Lest a wrong impression shotild go forth (though the question need hardly be put), I ask you—Did you take her as servant in the regular way ? Mr. Wheeler—l did, my Lord, and her wages were to be ten guineas a year. Hld you a character with her ? ' Witness—l had. She brought a letter, which at the time satisfied me. The property taken away was worth more than 151. Ann Allen stater; that she lives in Lion court, Wig. more street; knows the prisoner at the bar. One day, some weeks back. the prisoner left a gown and table cloth with her which she afterwards took awaY. During the time she was at her (Alias's) house she saw parr of nut crackers which she thought was silver; they were in the prisoner's possession. She afterwards heard of the robbery at .Mr. Wheeler's, and then she made a. disclosure of what she knew. The prisoner ohone oc casion acknowledged that the things belonged to bet employer, and if she pledged them she meant to redeem them. _ _ The officer who apprehended the prisoner produced two duplicates which he found upon her person, which led to the recovery of the property which be bad to produce. Mr. Wheeler looked at the property produced (part only of that stolen), and identified it as his property. • Miss Ellen Clarke smote to a purse produced, and .sehicb contained three sovereigns; they were safe • short time before the prisoner left. The prisoner attempted to invalidate the evidence of the witness Allen, by insinuating that she enticed ben to leave the things at her house, and also to take lodg ings there. Mrs. Allen indignantly contradicted this, and turning to the prisoner raised her baud and said, " Oh, you wicked woman!" The prisoner then made a long defence, which cow sisted of a sophistical attempt to palliate rather than to deny her crime. In the course of it she said, that Me 'hothead had Jong cohabited with smother woman, asidl ,heisig deserted she sometimes drank too freely. . The Loused Judge summed up the evidence, sod. *observed, that he could not see how the Jury could arrive at any other conclusion than that the prilamq was the thief, and that she took the property all ate* time; if they were of that opinion, tbairdoty wouldba to rentrac verdict of (kitty. The Jury...without. hesisatitio, returned a verdict of Grills—Death: Tie prosecutor recommended the prisoner to there,. Henry I%ompson. alias Mason. an elderly man of very respectabk *manse', was. capitally indicted for steal. lug a clock, v*lva seven pounds; is the dwelling-house of Dr. Ekudaruare.- Mt. Justice Lrrruniaus sue/toed up the evidence aid the Jury, resumed .a .verdict of Guilty of stealing under the value of 51. ROSEN/3 LODGINGS. . dam sit half crowns, and aquandtr of iativing.appareC. iltet-dareilbig- hawse of - Elitifkedr . Yettfit; the proper" *Nebo Thompatio; , --Veidia, egillieffaedifig 914 John Sinnnonds. aged SI, was indicted for itealta • g al pewter pot value Is. the property of Henry Burgos°, and also another pot the property of another person. The Jury found the prisoner Abraham Whiting, a private in the 2d battalion of the Sd Foot Guards, was found Guilty of stealing. on the 28th of April last, a silver watch, a gold brooch, and 15s. 6d. from the person of Thomas Yaw kes. It appeared from the evidimee of the prosecutor that Whiting and himself hadbon drinking together during the afternoon of the day-mentioned in the indictment, at a public house in Tothill street, We.tniinster ; and that while there be (the prosecutor) fell asleep, when the prisoner robbed him and left the house. Shortly after hi awoke he went to the barracks to give information f the rob boy, when he saw the prisoner standing in the rank , and pointed him out to the sergeant as the person who had robbed him ; and on his being searched by desire Of Captain Phipps, the Adjutant, his (Fawkes's) watch was found in his trowser's pocket, but none of the other property.—The prisoner protested his innocence. Mr. Sergeant Annals said he would be transported. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. dtrmonALL dens Levi, a twelve of Iretend,was brought Wire 10.11dreaom. %owe, for re.erarninatlon. charged with attireepting to cheat life. Freely, the landlord of the French Hem in 114 Akan. by know. ingly tendering as a half sovereign a sixpence gilt, to resemble that coin. There tire a grestninsber of these counterfeits in cirealatins,. although they are so easily detected from the motto being ea t h, garter instead of round the edge of the reverse side. The primmer stated is ber difence,that she bad taken it fa change for a sovereign.. That her brother had got it changed for ler by some amniotic was needing in Whit/chapel. Mr. Alderman Baowit said the Jury might believe that nory,but be should scud her for uial.V.nuaki e d. BOW—STREET. •,.'i An !rids Gentleman named Harris, appearei togive infontanites of a cheat which bad been practised on him. Re stated, that oo- Mooday be had:the curiosity to go into a Jewe auction room, in the Strand, where Se saw a very good looking watch put ap for sale thinking that it was unprecentedly cheep. be hid *inane 'lankly for its, and it was knocked down to him. Finding that if week, net go, be took it to a watchmaker's, end waa informed that it ma nta worth ME a 'sown. The Jew refused winching, it or renal , the money. Sir Rowan—Ton certainly must he a stranger in London,-Sir, These mock auction people live by fuisting ankles of no:ealse ohs the unwary. Mr. Harris—But, Sir. the auctioneer warranted that * watch' would go, and if k did not, then be would return the money Sir Ricstaso--Yes, we know very well what is wont by Ne sp warranty—it simply means, that the watch will go when earned. These vagabonds are the 'rested nuisances in the metropolis b ar being licensed auctioneers, they are beyond our reach. Mr. Hasze.-1 think it a very great shame that liceme" *sit be granted so sail persons, and some means ought to he adorebl to protect the public against robbery of ibis description. Mr. Hants then retired, saying, that as his less was as trillog, he would take no more trouble. LA Id BETEI.STR EST. Yesterday Hairy Hayes, s young sweep. was brnagb; up ee the following charge : Daniel Warder, $ private in the ttd Guard.. stated, ;g et w ha t mt. duty on one of the tampons of the Tower. be observed some hop on the outward hank of the ditch discharging a pistol towards whir" he was; but thinking they were merely using powder he tool no notice of them. and they continued their pranks.. In a few minutes afterwards, however. while he stood before one of the gun-boles, be felt something strike hint on the forehead, and en esasmination be found that two-Grains of SParr:w shot had pene trated the upper part of his face, and lodged in the 2eslt skin•deep. He in coniespience sent a Sergeant round to seCUte them, but they contrived to get away from him. The prisoner a short dose after wards made application for the pistol, which the Sergeant had its cured. and on representing that it was his, be was detained, and by the directions of Major Ebrington, the Governor. brought beide his Worship, to deal with him as be thought proper. The primer said that be worked for a person named Pomeroy, in Houndsditch. and that be and one of his fellow workmen, sad some other boys, went on that morning to fire at tome sparrows near the Tower, but be had not himself fired a single shot. Wooler Mid.that be could not take upon him to say that be law the prisoner discharge the pistol. Mr. Weave remarked, that in order to coustitute the charge an offence, it would be necessary to prove that the shooting was mak close ' • this he was certain was out the case. and he would merely order that the prisoner be locked op till the evening, and deprived of the pistol. Mien Walter, alias Black EyeJ Dilly. a notorious thief and bet glar, was charged on suspicion of being concerned io an eztenalve robbery committed on the.prensisee of Mr. Leith, in CAnnomervei Road, on Monday morning last. from which property to over OM lizsi been carried off.—He wad remanded. TOW N—H ALL . A very suspicious young fellow Mu put to the bar, and a bler seaman, named John Purcell, charged him with stealing les, at the Dundee Arms public-house oe Thursday night. " It was dome d& way, your Worship, said be; I was enjoying myself over a pima ale, when that fellow (paibelog to the primmer) as another 111.. looking lubber like him, sat down beside me, and said they wort. bard up. I've been la want of water myself, your tionSur,.an4 wouldn't see an enemy In dlstrefs, and so I shared grog with 'elk . ind called for another gime, and gave the young woman a soveroloC, to pay my reckonlag. She brought the change sad put it upaeffor table, when this chap—that's him, by G—d I takes up half a sova.: reign, puts it into his pocket, thinking maybap /'was three sheets in the wind. walks about a bk. and then says. Won't you take your charger No, says I. I won't till you unship that half ssi‘ .— reign. ' Won't you, goys be. then I whips the *st of the change to keep it company, and runs off like a Mel. Hari orate" see salt water again bet that's the villain, aadlf be an't a thief rfir Mowed?' Aldermen iharrn—l think be has acted by year sec** very much She one. The prisoner pretested - he bad not soiled its bands with a single farthing of the proomutoes money. The AU. derma° committed the prisoaer for trial, and ordered strict search to he made for his confederate. Accounts from various manufacturing districts shoiri . : that though the stir in trade is slow, yet is is on thetas proving side. In the North of Ireland, the wasvrees are represented as having borne their privations with degree of fortitude and resignation which is highly CA.; ditable to them, entitling them to the sympathy of all' classes. In Glasgow, several additional weavers were engaged by one house, at the-last, October prices; at Paisley and Johnstone, more hand. were employed; and the'cotton works were going on full time. MARRIED. At Edinburgh, on tint loth Met. lanes Moe Al** of Dahwinton. Dundrieweibik to Mario& Arlan, Med dligliait of Robert Downie, Rog. 44 AO?, NEWOATE atn LEADENHALCUAkIeirri, ions IS Beef... .. ...as 44 to 31 Id Veal 4e Od to hOd Pduttoo 4d to 3•10 d Pork ' _ ." ss lid to 4e 4,1 . Lad) 5s 44 to fieSd PrRICER°, HAT aso STRAW 11 at. 2Alltell. • *►rnlcra*a. • Hay 5110 s Od to .41 41 Od Hay . 51 Os ft .41 .54.1 (,lover . 31101 - 1/d. to 51 Oa Od Clover 51 Oa to a is Od Straw 011-tii•lll7 od 'Straw 11 101 tir d- ei ad- DAY. ' r till= Or TALLOW, 110 AP Ike: - ' ' 14 Od Yellow Sum 4‘..... - A• Yallom_.' Yellow Rut& ... ... 0s 119.0 d Mottled . / -.. , ‘ .41, 91 . 1 1,.....w0 White ditto"; • ~. ,•,„ . ••- s dd Curd' .. . .::,—... --• oo Soap ditto ? ' -5- .. =- !, -. Od Graves -... : .:. 6... 16•14 . Melting bur ........ . 52s 04 Good Prep ' -, . er . goli ~ MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, Jinn 12. MILLWOOD V. A CONVICTION OF MUM. MARRIOTT . _ _ AND GIiZOORY. Mr. ALLEY, for the appellant, stated that this was as appeal against a conviction of the Magistrates at Queen square police office, who had fined the appellant, 20s. for keeping his house open during Divine Service. In the first place he had to make an objection against' the form of conviction, which stated that the appellant had been convicted of " an offence against the condition of l a recognisance entered into by him on his obtaining *license to sell ale. beer. acc." Now, as there ewe so many.oiences mentioned in the Act of Parliament, he thought the conviction ought to set forth what offence the appellant committed. The CHAIRMAN—There is no occasion to do that coder the new Act of Parliament. Mr. ALLIY—I think it ought to be so, particularly as persons are liable to lose their licenses on a third conviction. The CHAIRMAN—•A licensed victualler enters into a recognizance not to do certain things. and a breach of that recognizance is an offence. The Court overt ules your objection. Mr. Aci.ite—My next objection is, that the appellant is convicted of keeping his house open during the hours of Divine Service. In this case the offence (if any) was committed between seven and eight o'clock in the even. ing, and not clueing the hours of divine service within the meaning of the Act of Parliament, which only mentions morning and afternoon service. The Magistrates who convicted had a doubt upon the sobj:ct, and expressed a wish to know the opinion of the Court upon it. They thought that, as the Act mentioned only two services, they codld not extend its provisions to a third. Surely it was not intended to deprive persons of refreshment who walked out for an evening's recreation on a Sunday. The CHAIRMAN—Let es hear the, evidence, and we will then decide upon the case. Rawlins, the informer's witness, was then called—He stated that between seven and eight o'clock on' the evening of Sunday, the 29th of March, he went to she Old Thatched House. at Fulham, kept by the appellant, and found it open. He was served with a quartern of gin at the bar ; the service at the church commenced that evening at seven o'clock, and was over soon after eight o'clock ; there is no afternoon serviciat Fulham. Te CHAIRMAN—What you call the evening is the afternoon service at that place; they have no other. Mr. ALLNY—Oh. no ; you cannot surely call eight o'clock in the evening the afternoon. The CHAIRMAN.-1 consider it the afternoon service let that place. Mr. Allen, the clerk of the peace, observed that the Church of England had only two canonical murices. The evening service was only a lecture, not ordered by its canons. The CINAIIMAN—I don't know how to distinguish it from afternoon service, : as they have no other. Pub licans mutt keep their houses shut while divine service is going on. I am not fond of these kind of convictions, but I cannot decide that it is a bad one. _ Mr. ALLAY—The case is an extremely important one to licensed victuallers living a short distance from town, whose principal customers are mechanics and others, who, after toiling all the week, walk out of a Sunday evening for the benefit of a little fresh air. There are several other convictions awaiting the result of this, and I implore the Court to give the case their serious attention. The CHAIRMAN—The Court has done an, and decide that the conviction mast be affirmed; had there been a morning_ and afternoon service, the case would have been different. WfUiam Mallisger, a journeyman carpenter, was indicted for having robbed and-attempted to violate a a little girl, named Elizabeth Thornton. The com plainant, who is about 11 years of age, and somewhat imbecile, wandered horn her home in Tooley-street, to St. Pancras, where she went into a public-house, and fell asleep in the parlour, where the prisoner was drinking. The landlord gave the prisoner sixpence to take the child home; but in the course of the same evening he was discovered in the Regent's Park, in a washed spot, endeavouring to ruin the unfortunate child; and her shawl was found in his possession. He was found Map, and sentenced to three months im placement. Carowu RiNTS IN Scandium—A great deal of dis cwnicos was recently occasioned in the House of Com itsons-hy Colonel DAVILS, Mr, D.W. HARVBY, and Mr. awns, on the incomeond appropriation of the Crown Revenues—more particularly those under the denomina tion of " Woods and Forests." Hence arose the appoint. meat of a Committee to investigate the conduct of Mr. NASH. Without fur they reference to that matter, our ob ject at present is to point out, that by the demise of Lady Wau.a.ce, late Dowager Viscountess Maur. I cur. on the Bth Inst. a revenue of .considerable amount, for a long time enjoyed by her Ladyship, now falls to the Crown. As the circurnstaacei regarding this revenue may not be generally known, it may not be out of place to draw attention to the MIMS. Lady WALLACZ enjoyed the produce of certifies Crown Lands in the counties of Ross and Fife. amounting, on the most moderate consputa• ilea; to £lO,OOO a year. The lands from. which these revenues were derived, were at one time the property of the Emma of Rote—who. on account of certain ambitions and treasonable prbjecti, were proscribed in the 14th century. thereby forfeiting those extensive territories which afterwards weredividedi and formed the foundations pertly of the•Earldonas of Seaforth and. Cromatty,.the Lbldship of Lovat, • and Were partly rested in the Crown. The revenues of the Crown in the comity of Ross alone amounts to 5.600b0115, convertible into - money at the sweaty rates, of which the . different, proprietors. about 20' or SO years ago, were. advised to reiiSifILIMINNII./ but which, after a litigation for several .years, therwerccoMpellad to pay, with all arrears, 'tbxlite DOSMerfatnily, theft la the enjotmeht of them. tbn mud, of Fife the ittanat was Bumf of the same aims and julporsance. PRICE or.HOPS, Joni 12. , • NW POCIRTS. new anon. Kent K. to Ilis Lent 114 s to 901 Sane: Rases lamb= fine 140. to 1681--fiteonds. 110 s to 140 s _ - COURSE OF EXI Amsterdam ...12 41 C.F Ditto at sight ...12 24 Rotterdam... 2 U 12 41 Antwerp ... ... 12 41 Hamburgh 94 U 13 144 Alton* ... 21 U 13 144 Paris, 3day'ssight 25 6$ Ditto ...2 U 25 85 Madrid ... 361 Cadiz ...341 Barcelona,— —36 BMus • ..341 IA NGE, JIM 12. Sevilla - 341 Gibraltar 4.91 Leghorn 471 Genoa 2S 7S- Venice .. t 474 Malta Naples SIR Palermo ~ 1122 per slo Lisboa Rio Janeiro .. -- Dublin Cork . . PRICES OF GOLD AND SILVER. Foreign Geld in Ban ... AS 17 Over, in Bars, standard 0 4 COAL MARKET, Jvn 11. Ship at Market. lairs Said.. - ?Ora He Newaude 10 4' Ws N a PP; ° 4 Sunderland. - 4 • Sig id to S U • —.0....0. G W ATER at LONDON-BRIDGE TO NOREOI,I Morning • • • .13 • ordintess ifter It Afternoon. - • • • • 3 mantes after 11 Lesson: Primolied Publhabood by Jong. Wm. do PioPiii* at the ft " ORFIP %We I PldWlWllles Tank PRICE OF LEATHER... .. Best Dres4ng Hides • • • ....... Common Ditto •.4.....v.......4... 194 to tid Crop Hides, 33 to 4064 foe aphis «. 140 to 144 • Ditto 45 to 5066.;...: .............1544 to 17h4 Cal( Sirius, 36 to 4011* . .• :6.6.6 -7 .. 6. Mkt to 244 Ditto , 30 to 7064 DitiO 70 to UMW • ... .. ... (2450244. . Small Se9ls, Greesliad) • ......»... ilod to 3111 .. Tanned Hone Hides ... ... .. .. led t0:334 Spaniiii Horse Hides .... —. .. ...... 3241 to lid ___. r