Star. — London, England, 1827-08-30 00:00:00

address, but I have not done so. My advice to you Is to quit this ' neighbourhood immediately, u I cannot tell where this affair may end.—lam,&e. CHARLES ANTHONY. I have felt it my duty to tell your father the whole of this inns action. This was the plaintiff's ease. Mr. Sergeant WILDS asked his Lordship whether he thought these was enough of malicious publication to go to the Jury on the record? The Cm's' Justrez said, that he thought the case was pretty clear. There certainly was, however, a point for the Jury to decide—whether the letter had been sent to the father through malice, or as a friendly warning to plaintiff, to get out of the way of the prosecution ? Mr. Sergeant WILDS said, that he could have no reason to complain of the mangler in which his Learned Friend had stated the plaintiff 's case, for he had can didly stated, that if the charge was without foundation, Mr. Anthony was at least misled. He had, however, to complain of the conduct of the attorney, who chose to take the course of a personal application inste id of a Written one. It, however, gave him the advantage of remarking upon the answers of Mr. Anthony, when taken on the moment without any consideration or any study. Mr. Anthony was applied to to make an apo logy--a very cheap mode to avoid the present suit, if a person was withcsut honour and without truth. At all times an action for a written slander was a most perilous affair, but there were occasions when to apologise, while it would do nothing to clear the one, would have done every thing to have stigmatised the other. He was addressing men of a certain time of life, and he was therefore before the best possible tribunal to judge of the conduct of Mr. Anthony. The character of a me dical man is above all others of consequence. Mr. An thony was the master of a family—a highly respectable lady, Mrs. Miles, had put into that family an orphan, under 16 years of age, where she might be under the immediate observation of Mr. Anthony s sister. What spoliation could be more vile or reprehensible than the spoliation of such a female? Mr. Anthony left his house in the care of the plaintiff, but no sooner does he return than he hears of the violation of that house by the plaintiff. On this, what was the conduct cf Mr. Anthony? It was quite evident he was indignant on hearing it. What did he do? Did he whisper it to others, keeping it concealed from the plaintiff, or did he instantly shew his indignation by desiring Mr. Brittan to quit the house? Could the most delicate or the most honourable act with more propriety? Now what was the conduct of the plaintiff? . . Mr, C. F. WILLIAMS here interrupted. the Learned Sergeant. He said, that after what his Lordship had stated, and knowing as he did, that his Learned Friend was labouring under severe indisposition, he thought that he should be best doing his duty to his client and to the Court, in consenting to a nonsuit. The CHIVE JUSTICS said, that he thought Mr. Wil liams had adopted a very wise course. There certainly was a very small fact, and that fact he should have left to the Jury, for he trusted that he should never intrude himself upon their province. The present course, how exer, was certainly preferable, as it at least left the character of the plaintiff in the same state as it was when he came into Court. The plaintiff was accordingly nonsuited. AUGUST 29. WHITE V. SODEN. - - Mr. SMITH opened the pleadings in this case. It was an action against the defendant for uttering slanderous words against the plaintiff's character, in which he im puted to him a felonious assault upon the person of a little girl, under 12 years of age. Mr. Sergeant WILD/ addressed the Jury for the plaintiff, and said, that his client had come into Court to refute the imputation which had been brought against him by defendant, which, if not refuted, would injure his character for ever. The defendant having made the charge in the most distinct manner in the hearing of a Gentleman whom he was about to call, the present action was begun, and from that hour to the present no attempt had been made by the defendant either to ex plain away or to justify the words which he had uttered, and now he had simply pleaded not guilty, meaning, as he understood, to deny that he had even used the words; but according to the Learned Sergeant's in structionr, he should be able to prove most satisfactorily that the words had been uttered, and in that case, the question that the Jury would have to consider woul.l be, what amount of damages they should award to the plaintiff for the very unjustifiable attack that had been made upon his character. Mr. William Fortescue Quick was then called, to prove the plaintiff's case. I reside in College -street, and know both the plaintiff and defendant. On the 21st April last, plaintiff was standing at my door, when the defendant crossed over to him, and some angry language passed between them. I did not bear all that Was said, but I heard the defendant say. " I never com mitted a rape on a child under 12 years of age," on which plaintiff said, " Did lever?" Defendant replied, •' I never did." There was then a pause for two or three minutes, after which, defendant, apparently much irritated, added, " You fellow, you have committed a rape on a child under 12 years of age; I have heard it from your own men, and I can bring the father of the child to prove the fact.* This I heard him repeat twice.. Cross-examined by Mr. ERSKINE—This conversation took place between three and six in the afternoon; 1 was standing at my own shop door ; defendant had previously lived its my house, but there was not at that time a 134 carrying any thing out from my shop that belonged to him ; detendant was much irritated through out, but plaintiff was quite cool ; there was no other person near when the words were uttered; no one within 30 or 4.0 yards; plaintiff did not previously say,' that I heard, to the defendant, " If you were an honest man you should have the house, but you are a d—d scoundrel;" I did not hear plaintiff call defendant a scoundrel ; but I will not swear that he did not do so, for I did not particularly attend to the first part of the Mr. &scum for the defendant, said that it was certainly impossible for any man to stand up in a Court of Justice or elsewhere for the purpose of deny ing the seriousness of the charge made by defendant against plaintiff; but, nevertheless, the Jury were always bound to consider the circumstances under which the slander was uttered. He was not there to state that even under these circumstances the words were justifiable; but at the same time, he had no doubt that the Jury would remember how they had been uttered, and the fact that the defendant was so irritated that he really did not know that he had uttered the words, nor did he believe that he had until Mr. Quick had come forward on his oath to state that such was the fact. He, however, was in CO condition to prove that the words were not uttered, for Mr: Quick bad told them that there was no other person !present withia 30 or 40 yards of the spot. The jury ' should also take into consideration that if any injury had arisen to plaintiff from the uttterance of those word., his Learned Friend would hate been able to show that it jury, but no such injury being shown, the jury were bound to take it for granted that the charge had done Isis charac ter no harm. The defendant did not pretend to say he would support the charge; and, therefore he was most happy in saying that the plaintiff went out of Court with his character entirely cleared. Under these ctr• cumstances the Learned Gent. thought that full justice might be done without awarding heavy damages against his client, especially as he was but a tradesman in a middling station of life, with a family looking to him for their support, and, consequently, the costs of the action alone would be almost ruinous to him.—The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 51. APPLEBY, Aua. 27. The Assizes for the county of Westmorland com menced this day. The Commission was opened on Saturday. The calendar is unusually heavy for this county, as it contains no less than nine prisoners. Mr. Justice BAYLEY presided on the Civil Side, and Mr. Baron fleLLocz on the Croton Side. CIVIL Stns.—Before Nr. Justice BAYLIT. POSTER O. AtKINS AND OTHERS. This was an action to recover compensation in da mages for the injury suffered by the plaintiff in conse quence of an assault and false imprisonment by the de fendants. The defendants pleaded that they had been informed and believed that the plaintiff had been guilty of a felony. The plaintiff, in replying, joined issue on the justification. Mr. BROUGHAM stated the case to the Jury. It was one which, from its aggravated circumstances, Mould call for the heaviest damages at their hands. One of the grossest outrages of which one citizen could be guilty towards another, had been suffered by his client. In cases like the present it was an excuse commonly set up, that the party committing the injury was in some situation or office in the gradation of justice, and there fore *sat no fair reason could exist for visiting him with severe animadversion. lint here no pretence, even As un founded a one as that to which he alluded, could be pleaded. About the begihning of last January a rob ' berg had been committed in the neighbourhood of Milnethorpe, in this county. On the evening when the robbery took place, the prisoner by chance came to the Royal Oak public-house, between the hours of six and seven o'clock in the evening, after he had been to pur chase some cattle. He sat down by the kitchen fire, called for a glass of ale, and prepared for bed. lie had scarcely taken off his shoes when Scarfe, one of the de. fendants, entered the kitchen, took up a candle which was burning on the table, and flashed it in the plain tiff's face. As soon as he had done this, he directed another man to wale)] him, and said, 40 This will do." In a few minuses, Atkins and Humber, the other two defendants, entesed, and immediately handcuffed the 'plaintiff. In spite of his remonstrances, they removed him into an adjoining room, and searched his person, brit could find nothing on him. During the infliction of this insulting injury, several tradesmen were present. The Jury would naturally demand what was the cause of such an outrage? The sole pretended reason was, that the ilaintiff resembled, in some degree, the person who had been since tried and convicted of the robbery. The Jury, however, would not allow such a mere pretence as that to pi event their giving his client exemplary damages. Witnesses were stalled, who proved the substance of 'the Learned Countet's statement ; and that the plaintiff had not made the slightest resistance to the defendants in their proceeding. Mr. ALDERSON, for the defendants, contended that the plaintiff had received no real damage, as he had been liberated within half an hour after he had been taken into custody ; and subm tted, that if persons in the situation of the defendants were subjected to heavy damages, it was more than probable the ends of justice would be frequently frustrated. Tile Learned Counsel then called witnesses, who stated that on the night in question an old m tn. who had been robbed in the di section whence the plaintiff had come, described the robber as a person ex ctly resembling the plaintiff. The latter had also admit'ed his having been near the spot where the rubbery war c , mmitzed. It was also proved that the plaintiff was really very like the man convicted of having committed the rubbery. Mr. BROUGHAM replied. Mr. Justice BATLEY, in summing up, observed, that as it did not appear that the defendants had ever seen the plaintiff betwe the transacti n in question, there was no room for attributing much malice to them. The Learned Judge left it for the Jury to say whether they thought the defendants had or had not acted from a conscientious belief that the plaintiff was really the per son whom they were pursuing as a felon. The Jury having deliberated a few minutes, returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, One Shilling. CRAW* Stor.—(Before Mr. Baron Ilin.LocK.) James !$l'P/person and George Williams, two young men of the ages of eighteen and nineteen, were charged with the commission ut a burglary in the house of a per son named Gateside, on the 18th of last June. The evidence produced proved that the house of the prosecutor had been left quite safe on the night in question. The next morning, when the servants got up, it was discovered that the parlour window had been broken open, and a cheese and a silver cup removed. On making inquiries in t►te neighbour hood, it was learned that the prisoner Williams had been seen linking about the premises on the preceding evening, and subsequently to join another man. These 'two were subsequently seen on the road towards the prosecutor's house, at three o'clock in the morning.— These circumstances led to the apprehension of the pri soners. On NlTherson was found a quantity of cheese, which the prosecutor swore to be his propetty ; and a pair of this prisoner's shoes were found on the other. .I'Pherson also pointed out to tire constable who appre hended him, where be could find the silver cup which had been stolen. The Jury found both the prisoners Guilty. Sentence of Death recorded. Joseph tiartky, aged SO, was placed at the Bar, un der a charge Of Dtraling a mare, the property of the lie•. Wm. Railton, of Cumber north, near Huddersfield, in Yorkshire. From the statement of the witnesses, it appeared that the prisoner had been seen riding the mare through Appleby, when his appearance exciting some suspicion - , he was followed. When he perceived that persons were watching bhp, he put the snare into a field, and at tempted to run away. After some resistance, he was secured. He afterwards confessed that he had stolen the animal, and requested that an intimation of the fact might be sent to the reverend owner. The prisoner pleaded his great distress as a reason for cominitti:)g the crime.—The Jury ft.und him (udty. and judgment of Death was record:d against t int. Edward William I lodgson was indicted for feloniously uttering certain forged notes, he knowing them to be forged, with the intent to deli aud Launcelot Wharton. Other counts charged him with an intent to defraud Sir Wm. Forbes and Co. bankers, at Edinburgh. The following were the facts of the case f—ln the morning of the 10th of last May, the prisoner, who is a publican at Orton, in this county, called at a publ c .house about two miles distant, and asked for sonic re. freshmen,. He tendered, in payment, a bank note of the Edinburgh Bank, and received the difference in change. He then asked the landlady to change him another note for the same amount, which she did. On inquiries being made, both turned out to be forgeries. Tile prisoner then Kent to another public house, kept by a ltvTrs. Taylor. He there called for a glass of brandy and water; in payment he gave a sixpence, saying at the same time that he was dispos 4 to take another glass if they would change him a note. Mrs. T. agreed to change it, on his assurance that it was quite good, as he had that morning received it from Wak.fiAd's Bank. Her suspicions, however, being excited from having heard that a large number of forged notes were in circu lation, instead of changing the note, she related what had passed to a Magistrate, in .an adjoining room. The pri soner was then stopped, and the note was discovered to be a forgery. On searching him a great quantity of silver was found on him; he said he had received the note in payment for a horse he had sold at Dumfries that day. He was also proved to have uttered five other forged notes to a publican at Cleburn, and a grocer at Strickland. It was in proof, besides, that he had passed by a feigned name of " John Gilson, of Hunton.' The Jury immediately returned a verdict of Guilty. Mr. Baron HULLOCK, in passing sentence of Death, told the prisoner that is must not entertain the slightest hopes of mercy. The law must take its course. The Grand Jury ignored the bill against John Miller, for the murder of his wife, by throwing her into a river. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL Yesterday Mr. Alderman A 1 , 4111.ZT was engaged upwards of an hour in a private investigation, whether any blame or suspicion attacked to seven watchmen of the ward of Crippkgate, relative to a robbery committed on the premises, No. 129, Wood.strret, a house situated between the Cross Keys Inn gateway and Cheap side. This house is let in three separate tenantcies, as warerooms, to Mr. Welberry, Mr. Wilkinson, and Mr. Feaver. Mr. F quitted the house at seven o'clock on Saturday everting, leaving the door fastened as usual merely by the spring lock. On Monday morning it was found that the premises had been entered by false keys, and stripped of 3001. worth of lace, and woollen, silk, and other goods of the value of 9001. more. The goods were of suffi cient bulk to fill a waggon, and it was presumed that they must have been carried away in the night time, and that this could not have taken place without the connivance of the watchman, whose box is flied up opposite the house. On TUellieli a .solicitor applied to the sitting Alderman, and stated that he appeared fur the owners of the goods ; that those Gentlemen had obtained the names of seven watchmen, who were on do'y at the above station on Saturday and Sunday night ; but that the con stable of the night had refused to allow them to he questioned, and that the authority of the Alderman alone, it seemed, could enable them to pursue their inquiry. Mr. Alderman ANSLIY immediately directed the watchmen to attend yesterday, and they appeared accordingly ; but on the appli cation of the solicitor, the inquiry was cooducted in the private room. A Common Councilman of the Ward was present. Nu clue whatever was obtained. The W3IC:111:1,11 stated the time they were on duty—for here they. are relieved and shifted almost hourly through the night from one part of the ward to another,—and they all persisted that they saw no vehicle waiting about, no goods removed from the house, no suspicious ch.a.ct,ri lurking, and they themselves were attent.se to their business. Charles I lerdsfteklrehe- istavilPikelkillOewspped I and searched a notorious fellow new the spot about etevs o'clock. ow Saturday night, but found nutkiug of a suspicious nature upon him. A young fellow was fully committed to take his trial for the fol lowing robbety : Mr. Wagstaff, who keeps a china and glass warehouse in London ,! - louse-yard, St. Paul's, said the prisoner entered his simisyesterday afternoon, about four o'clock, and stole two cut glass salts, which he handed to a Companion wtd made safe off with the booty. Mr. Wagstaff and his datighter Witted the prisoner, and gave him into custody. lie pleaded intoxication, but was committed. Several of the frail sisterhood were brought up as di-orderlies, and all of them sent from seven days to one mouth to Bridewell. They were chat ged principally with exercising their milling propensities. The officers stated, that the most favourite nue of the pickpockets was now to procure two of these Lydia, between whom they soon knocked up a sghting match, ant then robbed the crowd. BOW.STREET. Tuesday evening a middle Xgedrestectahly dr:4yd man, was brought before Sir It. Brame, by Ledbitter, charged by Mr. Price, the lesser of Drury-lane Theatre, with robbing hint of plate to a very considerable amount. The prisoner had been fee a considerable time in the service of that Gentleman as butler, and, in consequence of the very high recom mendation which Mr. Price recei►ed with him from his former employer, he placed the most perfect confidence in him, entrusting him with every thing valuable in the house, and with the payment of bills, and keeping of all the household accounts. Upon one or two occasions lately, Mr. Price fancied he missed some articles of plate from his side-board, which he had been accustomed to see there, but being unwilling to suspect any thing wrong, he took no notice of the circumstance. On Tuesday he had invited a party of friends to dine with him, and going into the dining-room shortly before the dinner hour, he saw that several valuable articles of plate, which ought to be on the side-board on such an occasion, were not there. Amongst the rest, were a massy silver waiter, and some table ►poons or a peculiar pattern, and be asked the pri soner why they were not on the side-board ? The latter said, he had left them below, but would fetch them up. A woman servant present said she would fetch them, but the prisoner said he would bring them up himself. Mr. Price felt so convinced from the man's mariner that something improper had happened, that he ordered the woman to fetch the things herself, upon which the prisoner said, that the fact was, he had taken them to the silversmith to be cleaned. Mr. Price felt his suspicions confirmed, but appearing to be satisfied with the explanation, he privately sent for an officer. Ledbitter came, and searching the prisoner, found al duplicates for plate pledged at various pawnbrokers. - A pawnbroker in St. Martin's-lane, and his shomnan, attended, and the latter produced the silver waiter spoken of, and a quantity of spoons and other articles of plate, which he said were pledged by the prisoner for 10L He had pledged a great many things at the shop, and occasionally redeemed some of them. The prisoner, when asked if he had any thing to say, burst into tears, and said he had a wife and four little children, and if the worthy Magistrate knew all the circumstances of his case, he would pity and almost excuse him. Sir It. BIKNIZ said he could not imagine any circumstances which could furnish an excuse for such conduct.—The prisoner was then remanded. HATTON-GARDEN. A Swiss, who porters about the markets, was charged with swindling Mr. Paraloe, a cheesemonger, in Euston-street, of various sums. He obtained money by depositing a sealed letter, said to ' contain his documents, entitling him to eCtOL prize money from the battles of Trafalgar and the Nile, which letter, when opened, con tained only a skeet of blank cartridge paper.—Remanded for a week. In consequence of information, a party of Officers went to the house of They Samos ,in Bell-alley,Petticoat-lane; and having secured Mrs.S. two young females,and a young man,they proceeded to search the home, wherein they found a large quantity of base coin, watches, jewels, silks, &c. concealed under the boards of the ground floor and yard, the whole of which, with the prisoners, were removed to the above office, where the prisoners underwent a private examina tion, and were remanded. QUEEN-SQUARE. Serge*, of Great Peter street, was charged with assaulting Mrs. Fleet, one of his lodgers, while in the pains of labour. It ap peared complainant's husband was Si. ids. in arrears of rent, when this man entered the room. followed by a broker, and taking com plainant by the arm, led her into the passage, where she remained a quarter of an hoer, when Mr. Bryant, the overseer, was sent to, wbo immediately came and procured her another lodging, having previously offered the landlord a guinea from bit own pocket to let I I!er return to her room, but he refused, unless Mr. fl *out' fir. te . -ponsible fur the whole .rt appeared the poor creature had hero in labour the whole day, and wa. delivered the day fullowin The Magistrate se*roely repfebended his conduct, and ordered hi 4 to give 44 hours notice of bail, hot at his earneet supplitadan, was allowed to cothpromise with complainant. MA Alfa LA-BONNE. _ _ _ R. Bonfield was charged with Imoking Platy Bromley, a c am tied woman. The prisoner, two years ago, lodged in the tom house, and on Wednesday he obtruded himself into her room sc. feted her Ss. to let hint sleep with het, and on her resenting the in, sob, he knocked her down, and kicked her while on the ground, The old cant of drunkenness was the plea, but which he was properlf told could nut avail him, and that he must either compensate tla complainant, 4r go to ptison. A private iß . the 5,1 Dragmms Was remanded, charged with steal. ing two 101. notes, the property of Mr. Bailey, of Ilinton.street, its whose house the prisoner's master. as Offi cer in the Reginiecti lodged. 'AT .1R Li3OROUGH-STRRET. Charles Little, a fa.hlistidhly dressed young man, was charged stit 4 indecently assaulting a him Rich, 'h,, was walking in the Lady; but on street a few yards beforebet husband, at twelve o'clock on Tuessbel night. The husband ran up immediately an d gave him into custnatt The defendant said he should not have t ouc h e d the Lady if he la.d not thought she was unprotected. He re f ute d at fi rst to pay an y beingtling too, ordered Charity, y i;n in d addition an t g o nd ap b o i l s og n i d a n in d g , to ada t the was &animal 02 paying ss. to the poor box, and apologizing, TOWN-HALL. James Shaw was charged with stealing two sacks from Mr. Him ter's granary, Horsleydown. The prisoner was met by Kinsey,' officer, in Tooley-etreet, with the sacks under his atm, who mot* ing them to be stolen, took then. from him, and discovered Mr Hunter's name marked upon tbem.—Committed. UNION -HALL. Yesterday a man, named James Buckner, was brought up to this Office, upon an information, charging him with having b,en a oa . earned in working an illicit still, in a house in Castle-mart, io the parish of St l Saviour, Southwark. • Thomas Gates, an Officer oil:else, deposed, that to the try previous he proceeded to a house in the place above imentiosed, and having obtained entrance by a manoeuvre, went to the biz tont pan of It, and there discovered a still, containing :".0 gallons of wash, in fill work. In the same apartment thire were op. wards of 13Olbs. of molasses, and other ingredients for the ma. nufacture of illicit spirits, and the defendant was on the spa., with his coat off and his shirt sleeves tucked up. The officer pro ceeded to seize the lot; upon which the defendant disclaimed the ownership of the property, saying that he was merely a lodger in ttm house; and, to account for his having been in the place when the seizure was made, said that he had just entered it a little before the officer for the purpose of washing his hands at the sink. The defendant made a similar defence before the Magistrate, who however proceeded to inflict n penalty of 301. on him, and in default of payment, he was committed, for the space of six months, to Brixton House of Correction. ATTACIISMT OF A SOLDIRR TO HIS licrass—Last week a person from this office witnessed the following interesting circumstance, which occurred in Manchester: —A private in the 6th Dragoon Guards going down Market•street, recognized his horse, which had bees sold with many others, by Mr. Capes, on the previous Saturday, in the act of drawing a cart, whe ; he ienrne• diately ran after the carter, and pitting a shilling into his hand, earnestly implored him ro use the animal kindly, as it had been his faithful companion in many a hard fought battle. Three gentlemen who witnessed the scene, were so pleased with the humane feeling which the kind hearted soldier exhibited, t at they each gave him half a crown.—Stockport Adveiliser. Extract of a letter from Heztot !trine, Esq. of Clover Hill. Donegal, dated 13th of August 1827:—" On•the morning of the 10th instant, we killed in lover Buy the most enormous animA of the seal kind, called a tea lion, in a sprats net—li had the gunnel of my boot quently under water, but fortunately (the last time he fastened on the side of We boat with his fore-paws) ore of the men hit him on the head with a foot sf.ur, and bothered him so much as to be able to get himintotla boat, where they kept bearing him until he was dean. liepreyeksAitalinnine feet four inches from the snout to the end of his tail, five feet ten inches in girth, and weighed 7291b5. His snout is like a cow's, his teem like a dog's; his head is remarkably small, the nail, oi his fore paws seven inches long and very strong, those on his hind paws are shaped like a goose's foot. Tins animal is the wonder of the fishermen, who come heie in hundreds to see it, and some of them say it bas been known in the bay these forty years, tearing their nets constantly." A young man, named Henry Mills, met witla &se vere accident on Monday afternoon. He was employed at Messrs Burnett's distillery, Vauxhall, and was, with another man, cutting chaff with one of the patent chaff. cutters; he was feeding the machine with bay, when it having got too full, he endeavoured to remove some of it: unfortunately, the wheel of thc machine, which was going round last, caught his hanJ, and chew it into the box, severely lacerating his arm and fingers. Me. dical aid was procured, and an amputation of one of the fingers was found necessary. Tuesday evening, as a young man named Caulfield, who is deaf and dumb, was crossing the fields leading from Somers to Camden Town, he was stopped by two men, and not being able to call for assistance, they stripped him of his coat, waiscoar, and trowsers, in which were ss. and decamped with their booty. The young man wandered about the fields until the watchman came by, who lent him his coat to put over him, with which he got safe home. MARRIED. Wednesday, at St. James's Church, Edward Lytton Bohm. Esq. third son of the late General Bulwer, of Heydon Hall, Nan folk, to Roane Doyle Wheeler, of Lizard Carmel, in the county of Limerick, only surviving daughter of the late Francis Aasf Wheeler, Eva. of Lizard C.onnel and Ballywire. The bride ins given away by her uncle, General Sir John Doyle, Bart. and the happy pair, after partaking of a cold collation at the house of Cal. Doyle, Montague-square, set off for their seat, Woodcot Hove, Oxfordshire. At Hamilton, on the 23d inst. the Rev. Thomas Grierson, ter of Kirkbean, to RsisseU, orly daughter of l'rofessor Warr, College, Glasgow. At St. Andrew's Church, Holborn. the Rev. William HtzlY England, B.A. of Pembroke College, Oxford, to Elizabeth,:hod daughter of William Prevost, Esq. of King's-road., Bedford.nnt: London. DIED. The 24th inst. at Kingston, near Portsmouth, Anne, the wiles( Major Albert d'Alton, aged 41 years. At the manse of EdinlsiHie, near Purrs% in the beginning sf August, the Bev. Thomas Ms Farlane, Minister of that parish. The 13th of June, at Puerto Rico, West Indies, Cornelius Kett' right, Esq. second son of the late C. H. Kortright, Esq. Monday Jane Gordon, youngest daughter of Sir hurray lUlk well. The 20th instant, at Belmont Cottage, near Hampstead. Jae Stevenson, daughter of the late Dr. Alexander Stevenson, Physic'' in Glasgow. At Bellerive, near Lausanne, in Switzerland, Mrs. Madeliw Susan Baird, wife of Captain Wynne Baird, R.N. MAILB—s- MIL DWI. •11116 gl• Dublin 1 0 France t 0 Water(, rd 1 0 Hamburg 1 0 Guernsey and Jersey 1 0 Flanders 0 0 Lisbon 0 2 Sweden 0 U Donighadee 0 0 Brazil 0 I Buenos Ayres 1 0 I Amer i ca 0 0 Holland 0 0 1 Leewsrd Lihnda ___2___F..... 'HIS DAY. - - • --- .. - L - -=------- -- .. , DI N- W ATILkt at LONDON-BIUDO& TO MORRO ! " Morning se geisugas gar • _ - - g 18 inanuteg alts_ Lot an: Printed and Yubliglied by Jens JiAYnl, the Pr ,, pr: , * , at the Snit 0--Ice, No. 1, Pickett-phice, VI 'w V CI a • c I a{ aill Prl lir