Star. — London, England, 1829-04-07 00:00:00

.~ be p , eTteet retell, Of toithi,militt Lordshlps ', shilliogficeliideis, yourlrrisitire an to fol.tifireiddfie i I veAirterad ter rc .aptl.r. In , the 'North of Ireland, in the colliftrbf*ntritii i theta were Vitale forty-shillinghie hmaivi tetttlifited siiii be - Year IN% - 4198 of-whose ciNld'oht read les.Vle intinAtof Melee, within the same Perin& theie wire ' if ,85588_ b Metered bf the same class, and 3,560 could not write their own seasec Itt tlictoonty of Clare there Were 10. 1 153 free , holders territories!, 3,eso of sibotnedildtwitywiette theit siOris:'. Inthe coturiyisf Limirick4,43T-3,688 eotild not write their names:* -In the county of Mayo 25,6211 —:l9.4bs could •nnc write theit. nether.. In the cavity orrateifeids;llW-41§20 of whom coehi not OW *is, seam. From dill statement Your Lordsbips'istif learn bow well the forty-shilling freeholders in Ireland are'ciosble of exercising . their right to vote. And the ohjectiop which has peen made to the present Bill is ; that it lacltuiet As fregh'oldais in fee. Tour Lordship, will see that at the time of the proceedings of the Cciai-. mitre! to whiclithave already referred, the number of forty-shilling freeholders in Ireland was very small ; in snmetountiel there. were none ; in othets pethapt two or three; but, generally!speaking. there-were at that time no freeholders of that desct tption in Ireland. Two years before this Inuit was made a chines' Was intro; dated to enable those of the deactiption I have flub; timed to register their freeholds. They were not te: goired to produce their titles; they hid only to prove that they "dela . porieraion of thegiotrod which they might neither till nolgille; hut they Wefebbligidlo sweat that t hey neither paid Ouitiseigritond ient.This practice,your Lirdihips will see; Wei much whine than anyother; as, in liet.the pitta's's/the sti - sekisteled might have no tight, sti-alli to their'fieehbldr. But; beiides'this; my Lord% If? t rie Is iiinthetabuie Whitt All &Wives ' your Lord 'hip?' aft , ffitintt Weltivietiiinethait ode instanced pitionseielting a large* nirMwer ' of freeholdi foe the ;4 . 64)0 of kiiiihyttherrlieliki pofintitittfissence on the en sniot elections; but, havitigfottorr reason to 'expect etileccuriefiteoran electhin earlier thin they had sa l :- PASO, they foised'it'neeesterf td transit thote - If* hoTdel Act the alentitaliii, atid'to give them ft etheldsin fe:i. t' tit taking' adrintrige' orthli' syitern in °Mei . to frtiviird theiretin vlivri.' Iliaveinicfcfnbt, myLords, teat' tnii will see the attratitigCof pitting a'stbp to this. ifileni ? The pielerit . nieistire Will prevent any one from voting w ho imitates a freehold r.f a - mialler an nail rainy thin IN. The Bill provides that the pet inn. most peore his freehold to be of this vibe whether he holds it in fee or otherwise. My Lords, I think it is framed in such a mariner as will . give your' Lordships iatisfactiOn, and eatery into execution a fair mode of as certainit;g'that such is the real vale& it is not my wish cir intention tit givi inflifeisee 6,414 clay; of persons hfrin t i . that *high they should mitheally hope. I wish tharthe landlcirdt should prisseis,a * fair influence under it:a as . Well as die other sygetii, but I also wish that ev4i: Outdo/lin' possesses the teilgisitif • quilities and *elite:din& flit sittiNCK the Ifoo4 of Commons Ao'eld I;ev0 4'l+4 and equal Chance of finding hitu l / 2 7 inio'it; . f i liiildi : theie c tenni dikes, my lAndi, I beg kiii'! (A more the second' reeding of this Bill. • • Tne Doke of RICHMOND aleraft rose With. great . itioto Otter' ft um the Noble Mike at the head of .bis Majesty's' thiverninent, but when the Noble Ihrtit* pro. poed a-measure ter the phipose of destreryint a loge --'body of eleitors.Unconeicted of any crime, and onlieltd in theii own defence, he felt it his duty ingive his de cided. npinioa against the useAure, ads affording . - a 140 ,deligetunspt t efeden‘ ll* aikriowletiged that in the eatly ,na - tt of l'ls' liable hid ia paid much attention tri , mitic:l4iitteere, for he litif ateirys thotitttr that the great clitillki of *Bail% freedom was sufficient to , poled the - litt Ines #lO rights of the people. He' did nay afteet iii I 4 veisd in the law, but Whew he re- . collected drat it the dine the' Irish burooglis were dis fraichi,eltennuterlificin Wasgiventheid, 'at Must - have bean fur thegt , tiad that th e eleerivl* franehhe Was a species Of, pronsityr* and if sw, he Weight the person pope : slog it had as teeth' claim to hale hat &thrifty ptOteteit as any other_ of riiepertf'.. [luring the debates which violin - Fe - list sithei an their Lordships' ',Apse, much hid liern iiid in fifth* 16 pfoe't dust ill the-great then of tafilit Ind thilittente Wire hisbarked in the cerise, of Catholic EMintipiition; bet Woad those Noble . Leadi whoitipof* the ptesent. 88/ ittempi to quote . filch nitriii a "filtt ana Fog ; tae CILIUM% and Liverpool il the advi*Mie of the destine , dirt of the franchise? Whaler that Nolife Eirlitho with iter !pitch eloquence , and with so little reitittabee,-at tacked those } ' rich ivhbin he acted *hen in the tim:hine Of power, and who had hein sent to Ireland by* hi r.Pitt; .there to e jai the, adiantiges of effiee— Would that lidile Eaft pow turn round On aid sillnstrioui Statep• Min,' and accuse him of tiblig the fiiend to this mei sUre r The .Noble.Dtike - had talked of the spir itual ia, itwice which the Clergy pOssesied 01Kr the 40-. fie*. 614ift ins. befall& It, War true that that spiritual iii ueoce, in conjunitinn With the feelings of the people, was sofas itieiestfail exercised as to thloW out aCabinei Pinker - Irons ittekipletelitation of a county in Ireland; Wit be. Would ri':sk, as there no instance of the Juane ''and in Enilltiad ? of did the NOble Duke firket *hat ' *ace* lilac* gine% - ' di - -.- . ' m -1 itiil shoild be read a MerresVtiato Oat dej • :is months. The Mop of OXFORD eras promeeitte make maw oboe. vales Melange of the Amin' tit;Uidi'dMy of Oxford; when . - The Doke of RICHMONt) said be hid braight no 'charge against them: Whintith" 'be bed said was rather in praise of their conduct, foe be-spoice. of them as honest. independent. conscientious meA who rented in i minnir 'which might seetrioppOsedio thik temp. ral interests. Lord -REDESDALE spokein favour olthit • He contended that the amount of qualification in , leer land sboold be bionght hitlitirjrbit it was in the time of VIII. whin forty shilling" •wis a vervdiffeient ssens• Henry_- .to what it was at present. Gress abuse; hed crept into:the nerche of, thli right sitter' 1793.' and -they ought to be remedied. Lord FARNHAM said that greet • abuses - ezkidi rand therefOre 'he 'approved of the genera) principle :oft the Bill. He bad' objections; hbvitter, of a eonseitito clonal nature, to some of the proehions of thilllll. It might lead to great abuse if the•wbele conssitnency of Ireland were placed* inothe bands of the Assistant Bar.; rimers. who were appointed by the'Crown; and *We semovable at pleasure. Appoie an Assiiiiiit Barrister were disposed to induenoen countyelection, would not this Bill afford him the means of doing•so,.by• giving' hitt the privilege of approvintor'clisariproving of the right of every eleceirt? ' There was an appeal to the Jadges of Assize, but it -would be too expensive to be effectual. It would be . better if the Assistant Barrister Irks' madenterely an AMMO* to the Magistrates. The power of appeal should be given- apinst the affirmative as well as the negative of the Barrister,ond he thought it woild ; be better if , feHisrphr freeholders under fat, weveatinwed la •ot6; • . • Lord MANNERS Said' he could conceive nothing better calculated to improve the state of Ireland than this measure. It "meld cheek Perjelyoescue the Irish cottager from the ihfinettee "or his Priest, 'and restore that friendly connection which otteht to subsist between the landlord and hisienant. Solar from thisprivatios being cOnsidesOd a hintiship-by the staid Body bf the Irish freeholders, if simild be Itioked!itpre ass relief and a benefit. It wassatural to soppose,frons hialegal that he should be as jealous as any nioacif vested tiglasi bat he was nat so blindly prejudiced to any law, how ever old, as to resist its improverhetst whenit was shoe* to be bad. The forty-shilling freeholders or. Ireland could no mote be said to represent the landedinterest than it theY'voted , by right . of universal suffrage. filo far froM being oivnera of .ffe'frerhold, they' weretnertly occupiers, who paid the tent by their osiikl'ahriiita ht was a miickerr to cell than proprietors. In VIA, the elective franchise Was given to Roman Catholics;.ae a sort • of compensatiot fate their eielittioll fiver Path.- silent. The effect of it hadbeen tried fore lent and .the result was that it demoralised the country e astd the evil was more erreetly felt by the forty-shilling Iteeholders theMieleerthen by any other dorsi lie had no. doubt that this nitistire would improve the' morals of the people, and tend icy much td the public . peace of Ireland; He hid opposed the other Bill, proposed by the Noble Mite (of Wellington): and his colleagues, and it was with regret' that he - found himself obliged to .rote againstibem. They h a d changed their opinions, r it was thie f boa so far was this from dirninishinibis MmedenCein them, that it remained unsbaboa. They made the , greatett'sacrifites; and when he *air suer • measure supported by p. nods of rank. Of expertise", and poewising &great )141m in*, country; all tot's was a pledge to him, of the sincerity of their opinions, and a proof of their having, stion't groutide for the nietsttre proposed. SO far therefore was he fawn feeling asy dims:win. the Noble Doke from his change- of opiniosy that he was rather diaposed to distrust his own. .hoped it would turn Mat that he Was wrong. and thilt the Bill, to the second trading of which their Lordship had lately given their assent, would produce all the effects expected from it ; that it would tranquillise Leland, unite Roman Catholics . and ,Priiteitstits,, eirra strengthen the hinds of Government. ' The Marquis of MITE said, if he thought this (ilea. sure was opposed to the interests or to the wishes el the panics iiiterested, he should Vote against it. Thee however MA appearing to be the ease, and many CAI , !sanitation' from Ireland having anootteced that - th• 'people weiaglad to lie relieved ham the forty sbiliitej franchise as from a bhrthen, tre'shtlaid therefore At: port the Bill. The Marquis of CLANRICARI)6 opposed Vie BaL Ile thought.it a useless measure. It aoutb make 60 difference in the comp strength of Plotestiati and Catholics at ele:tions. Pretestants would ;till caw tinue to be returned i Plerfastent asunder, and Roman Catholics, or Protestaitatffbn viete pOsialtr, in Roman Catholic counties. they heard Muth of the sleintorali!) ing influence of the forty shilling franchise in Ireland s but there was no proof that it might not be altered A* the better. ,The people Emoted that they Wefe fully sensible of the advantage they enjoyed; for they et& played it most effectually in the attainment of a great and ihr - lw that foe thirty yeire they Mould made of vote hXkinst Rutanci.- Partied a differ cot course. rind lie Catholic tlisestiott. Mach yeti/panty in Ireland. To they Must . tufn tint the;preif id, and howw-weie they to bee -opposed to the Bill on eves, t hose Noble birds, who *we iiilntittaty MA*, Child sup, regretted tile mean , t, ne was met Noble Lends *be had . ,t New! hi o:lnstance celled Only objet doe be torrid at all -* it late/freed with vested arts nerldblitell by ttie re leereen %pry rather this niestei Ail* lie ihotish. .:old to the abiendaney also by degrees remedy ratty tbenglsOlierd of—; theiefore Vote for elrbetrestirre measure; bet he' his easivietiors, that lad, the atier and !fainter I littlb Wattle bared.' 401 email hot sVi Ott' *e'en* the frrejoslielal eil is., heft% Me terlrebleti, AO& IllbetistetVeHlitteli **fib** frie;hoileti!l and loopy. Ainkous that Ireland snotdd jodiciouslollciwing p bad asked what Was to be done with the people who 'Wald lose the little - ground they.baS? "Ala 16 re t gy he would state, that there - was a • wait qoantity_of un coltitated land in Ireland, much of which'' would, thioogb - the op erstion of this 111114" if became-a•lac, be Waugh" Into tobiration. HO was desit our of tecitig she proessitias of 'this Act extended to towns and xlties. for if they were not, wretched mud csbins- would .peedflY be 'bolts and battery,' .corrut.tion, amicoatu• sion wit* appear in thine places. He was also desirous that the-alteration in the franchise with: respect Au ; farty-shillibgfrotelsoltlemshOuld be esteniedio the elec. lion of Crimpers. _ _ The. Earl of MALSiESLIIIRY really felt himself placed in a very eztiaordinary.situation inane respect Hehatdly toew with whbm hewas to , considerthiasself :air sitting; he 'wds - 11 decidedenemy to what was called !reform, and therefore he should opcosethe4llll; and he must say that he was geratlyastonished to find that ;many who , bad: so frequently and so loudly spoken in f.avbur of the tightsenttliberties of the people did-not ; also raise their voicesstoainst it. In those advocates of fileelloiwthe . two . ettrentes•cestainty , appeareil to base 'Met, and each to be - equally 'pleat in guiding their votes. He had thi. hottest of *ls eland. most sincerely at beset r, in*a desire to benefit. that country .he yielded to no man, and het id :pracricallyproved-upon 'orioles occasions die stneeeity °this ptotessionv His votes re ipecting it bad Often been to. his Own injury as an Erg. lish landlotd. The House would remember that it wa. In 1806 that the measure-was introduced which ad mitted the agricultural produce of Ireland into this wintry, and. that measure bad his cordial support. He had ako, epos; eveiroppostunitr; advocated the ad mission of the-average -prices- its' Ireland into the go . verning averages. 11, therefore, be opposed the Bill before their Lordrhips, not be considered from so doing an enemy of Ireland—(year , hear, hear). He opposed the measure ipso Constitutional grounds. lite Noble Earl then Wetted to the preamble of the Act, and cberacterised the measure completely as one of u- form. He was told th.t it would be practically no such thing:hut a correction of gross abater. *But how was he to know that'? The' only substantial information which their Lin dihipshadbefore them was the evidence taken - before their Lordships Committee in 1825. By that evidence hrlearned that there were many votetw in Ireland by right of a 40s.freehrld held in fee - simple, and be wished to know, if it was not a measure of 1. 9 .ar• liamentary Iteform,how they could be deprived 11 - their hatichhe?. Nowin E11:413 ttie r w.is awitlicr de scription. of. Os. beelioldityiet its- origin vicaims.. but r ea4 ile,p.oied . bp tirrie anitlia4ou . sustances. It was well know% that many, peissith‘Vb4ifferent parts, had bulk cottages , upon eontintrha.. ilatUwess• suffered to in , close them,. through, perhaps, the good nature of the Lords of the Manors, sod' to retain undi,torbed pos. omits of them for **long a period that they ultimately' claimed them as their freeholds, and the claim was folly lowed: - -Now he arishociao koose• shether there were voters of that destripddlEftigrefind?..brlooking at the Bit/ too, there was i oeincii.T. Much importance to the persona who bald Illeektedi)y i-,that ought to be borne in remembrance„ t *lath - 6101e di6Colty the 'prior found in procuring babitatiims. and theddrst culty arose from the exorbitant demands osadelottreit: The Noble Earl , then referred 'to the evidence of Mr. 'Lothian. respecting those voters who • had acqdirid freebolds through building cottages on commons. and *skid if their Lordshipt were prepared, at one fell swoop," and without inquiry, to destroy all the Irish 401. freeholders ? . How different had their 'conduct been skit respect to corrupt boroughs. He had not become a reformer; nor could he dunk the argument of his Noble Friend (Lord Winchilsea) likely to make him one. He could not agree with his Noble Friend in becoming a reformer because a great number of the Mensbersot both House had so strangely changed their opinions. He preferred an attempt to remedy the abuses, by separating the boat: fak freeholders, rons the fietc tious, and - preserving inviolate the rights of .the former.. He firmly believed that the Bill was proposed in the spirit of compromise, aad if enacted wouldbe so against the real opinions of a large majority of both Houses. — He looked upon it as no security. He %told rather we the other measure denuded of all securities than the Bill before their Lordships adopted. He professed him self to be an anti-reformer, and he had also coosidered himself a friend to civil arid religious liberty; but really tiros* words had been so to.sed about from one party ter another, that lie hardly knew what they now meant. If lie was called upon to describe an anti reformer and a trend of civil and ieligiourlibeity in the present day, he supposed he must picture a person with a Bull in fa vour to P.spery in one hand, and a Bill in the other, taking away the elective la anchise,without inquiry, from t large mass of people. Ile most cordially supported tbe amendment of his Nibble Friend. The Earl cf WINCHILSEA—I rise, my Lords, to ad; a few words in opposition to this Bill, although perfectly convinced that no argnmews I. could use worst! bare the effect of defeating it. We are called epos, my Lords, to pass an Act which, in my opinion, 'goes in a manner the most unconstitutional to take away the liberties of ar great proportion of the community, and without any inquiry having taken place to warrant such a proceeding, and to establish a precedent 'for placing the privileges and the property of tbepenple in the hands of any despot who might choose to abuse it. (Hear, hear . .) We are told that this is a measure calcu lated to produce , the greatest benefit to Ireland. Had that been, proved at the Bar of your Lordships' Horne, it would, I confess, have induced me to support the Bill; but ib the absence of such proof. I f e el that I would not be discharging my duty offe I to'give my selection sad support to a measure of such a nature, meet, because it was recommended by a Minister of the Clow', without evidence of its necessity- s its policy, and its puke. • I bad not the honour of being a Ment ioer of your Lordships' House when, in the year 1825, • Odder* was given berme a Committee of your Lord ships recommendatory of the principle of the Bill; and even if I had, I would not rely upon, of be won over by' West evidenc*, because the leading and influential indivi duals who gave it would, I am convinced, were they nest tb to'melor war dot the bar of your Lord sh ips House, depose on their . - oaths to a directly contrary effect, and who would now declare that it would be highly. %Mow led improper to deprive any portion of the people of tested rights. The great arguments of the Noble puke who 'brought forward this measure referred to, three points—first, thatthe freeholders themselves, by, toothiness sod their seem to register their free.; ,Inni *faun on indifference to the franchise, which eviriced that tidy *sit. no value on it; but. why had not the recomniendetion or the Ctoiva to tcinsidkr inestion of the state of Ireland been ay. Had that been done, it would hav e this omission to register proved net but the poverty of the people.... made by the Noble Duke was, that these Ay.shilliog freeholders) exercised no will but were driven to the hustings in flick s landlords-to etil.C..thee . :shottfd . .be.dettited a the very opposite.line of conduct totaled the third ground relied on by the Noble Duke for calling 'opOwt heir Lordshiptto pass this Bill.. M y Noble Friend; .(Lord Mrdinesbetlyieberved in the coarse of his sp eec h the question of Parliameetary, Reform. lam not a , Reformer. I may not, perhaps, have an opportunity of •Irtsting my sentiments upon the question of Reform it shall be brought forward in your Lordship s '' House. because, convinced that the -measure carried ;last night, and.' carried too againtt the sense of the great majority: of 'the nation, convinced- that it will be carried - through its future stages in this it ste t contrary to the. sentiments of the people. for I CORM(' that the- senthiseets of '•the people have not been sei.resented ; and convinced that that mea the will gono aker iompletrly the•Conoittitinn of this realm, still quit shi, House with that Constitution, nor will I re enter within: these walls, nor take-part in any fnale , di cusinans of this House, untie/ Constittition•so muds altered. With respect to the question of Par liamrntary, R e f,am. I shall say that I should like to see it effected on one point—to see the donation of l'aeliament altered from septennial to triennial—ts witness a 'corn of that wholesome rover ,which the people had in theirhand s. until deprived of it by innovation — (C heel s) I entertain a f s o in r c brd e th d a es t ir l should desire also oull7 another rpeetes of reform. G OD wish .to take, or assi,t in taking. from any man his vested rights without .an mini Want But, if any man, or class of men. possesses franchises or privileges ioconsis:eut • with, or injurious to, t h e great interest< of t e Stitt. I maintain th.von general and constitutional pounds they may, and ought to be with drawn, giving hint. as far as practicable, an equivalent. With respect to the question of the amount of qua lification for voting, I am not prepared to trouble your Lordships with any observavons. I have nor, in fact. made up my mind to it. But to return to the subject LI reform of Parliament. The e iv, I say, another, point on which I most aoxiontly wish to see reform, and in referring to which. and expressing my earnest desire to see it effected, I take Goo to wit 'act I am not influenced by the line of conduct ad .pted by any Members of the Right Reverend Pena on the great question of conattuti.inal liberty last yen (the Act. fur the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, as was understood), os the other measure to which I have ref . ..reed, although those n•eauies go to separate the-Protestant religion from the inrtitutioniol the country.—for I can confideotly• ass- rt, Via; the opinion I am now about to cline's I have held for the last ten, years,. as is known-to cane_ Mendrer of that Right Remold Bench, and to titter firaividii . ali in this Clouse and ink of it. That 'eters to a point of discipline of the Chinch. It was said by a Right Reverend Prelate the other night, that a Church with out di .cipline could not stand. Su ch, too, is.my opinion, and I call uponshe head of that Right Reverend Bench. to lose no time in bringing forward the measure fur a . reform in its discipline to which lie alluded—for if no wait until the present Parliament be dissolved, a change' , may take place in its consults ion—if there be. as t , believe there are;lndividoals who are determined open and will not teat until they see the downfall of the Chwch--(Chems).. There it, I say, another reform which I wish to see in the constitution r f that Right ;Reverend Bench, and that is, that no translation shall , 'lnk. place from one bishorick to another;—(hear), that theii incomes shall be equalised or proportioned to . the duties wish which they ate charged. 1 wish also to see another change still more import int—naively, that no blinieeer of the Crown shall have the porter Of appointing to Bishopricks; btu, that they shall thew selves choose from their own body three or four indivi. chialr; whose names should be submitted to the Throne, I should moreover wish to see no removal, except to Archbishopricks and the See of London. • There is still one more article of reform . that I should like to seem- Sled into effect; and that iv- that the members a( the Right Reverend Bench, should hold seats no longer iu this House—(ebeees).—Whatever•difference of opi nion there might exist-between she and your Lordships, 1 can conscientiously say, that it would have been . for the benefit of religion and of the religious establish ments of the country, if this portion of refor in had been effected before the present day; for I am convinced that, if those Right Reverend Prelates had not had seats in this Honse, they would have had more influence than It is evident they possess. Fully impressed with Mill co eviction, I conscientiously and candidly declare it.— Ilecollecting, moreover, that they were placed in this House for she .purpose of connecting the Protestant Church Establishment with the other institutions of the country, I will now put it ter any Right Rev. Prelate to say whether the changes in troduced and about to be intro duced are o misteot with the safety of the Church Esti bloshment,and our other institutions? Hithlajesty'sblinis. tea say that extraordinary changes have taken place— !bete I cannot understand, but I am extremely anxious to know upon what gr; undsthesetertiil changes in prin. ciple and opinion which we.. have lately witnessed cal ' be accounted for and justified. . An extraordinary cit cumstance was lately consinunicated to ine by one of the Hon. Members I Kent. Oats the itor - 5.... __ day ; at Om -mast of the lag war,, two men, soldierr, Weis walking together.in the neighboirbood of liiirwiclir i. one was a white man, the other a black, belOngifigtO the band. Unfortunately they met a woman who was in.company with a sailor, 19 whom' she w ai about . to be married shortly—upon • whom they 'commenced acts of the thost atrocious violence—they violated the woman, and neatly Murdered the swan; and, having been apprehended, were for these crimes brought to mial, convicted. and executed: But. the fatal come gm= did not rest here, for at the end of Aloe months the we was deliieretLoCa white child and a black one. Now I say. exattly 'as these births occurred in maigral hiatory, was the Noble and Learned Lord on the Woolsack the othei night delivered of twin speech% eqsaUy strange, unaccountable, and at variance with ordinary principles—(Cheers, and loud laughter). I ought to have added, that there was a most liberal sub scription made for the unhappy parent of these twigs. I Shall•now only say, that 1 could not leave this Nooses as I shall do immediately, and for ever, without asap ins the Noble Duke at the bead of his Majesty's Op vernmes, that in the course I have ruined respecting the oppositiop I have afraid 10 this measure, I was m actuated, in the slightest degree,.by personal widow No inan in:isi out of this House-bolds that Noble Doke highet is respect thin.l do ; for his put brilliant ser vices no Man feels more admiration or gratitude.—the • opinions Iliaire expressed upon his public meson" I k cOnscieitiOasly entertained._ I sincerely wish, shbO I ‘ 1 9 64 bore* thelupprebensions of danger 'from measisree.noiiin progress nay Dot be rtas4ed. and ._ % • 'lie, 41rfirte•aileAketo utiaipata./ - by the °IT 1 Duke—:(The Noble Earl, who tbtouglsoleteenOr'' . 1 biba in Eijilitiad? of diddle Nrible Mike f iiket ishat I played it most effectually in 01 )10d tacit Trim. shore fetal* .at Osfutd, when those and iMportant ohkkt: .They sal COniiiiitAilesi, inil indepindent nien, totally regardless the fie 'st use which those *horn atsttets bsin temporal' ifiteiest, threw out a Citinet Mi. their s e a t s in p, i ili g n t nt wav i i filter linen' the representation? He did - not - think their patiiin. T; cy they @fete prattitil idled)biiiii ititulit consent t'o' the present ateature.6t 14 so doing they caulk' the Cat 000hIpot Selseie that they would consent to such an was said about est4b i:hing a ye unirittWantable attach upon vested right, and to de- get . make room for a yeomanry 04 a ono ita ingipient • on the electivf fisinehlke. iU t Via sent ccupiers of the lands an iii, 14 • iok at Bill peelresited fictiti:;nl ien•postbd proiidetl Pr ? H. was •opposr ll' . . use d gc ; * Ala, t ., :Acie t tiAis f or gy. s hatri l k f re e hitherto frierislitto Parlibluenta ni e 44, ~t , ~,,.„-,..,,„.....,f ieforns * fi lth be chilli) port it. - tai itstait,:tps 'Oda Ire itiiitild be *Mir* to SuppOri, Lord RostßEat ',fretted ). in t e it,Wie t wat is 'OA io give any isess ttghti or peivi. WWI of diffeibli fi b% teen les to t he ins4ta. : Aut to protect thosk ssltich thei opiiosed s t6 Will, filfett NM sk eallt ,POtstsaid t ; • ..k lgobte Dike had talked di upon to Support it.- he Pay a rie to the'; irbiises O it dd) e 4 dGeoieii.d in havt to the Write aste enki dust it . the yeas k lt it. ii. twat* ibtsis ilyetiel tit*is, he lights; brit that &Attie% *its . 'nnspisl ~.as 'k Ve s i y 'that Wilie n* iiiifeined then—wl4 rucMlianci that ihnitreigigtletter **Oat ' 'tli td the 'fist,. Inot tut lankink a benefit to those with now se itih . " * eir 4 • '.. idid to lien .)/oeloo 'Ellen, the flk4l teoutd to Ist to Ott an Intl **.) .oo Al tea 6041 irde? lYtd ha a eat- id thetAtiolic reltitbbeidoitals e Etr es' eia Ifs tiaireb %It" nit . silt% dire Other 'cell which witli lib St • i fis rirattioirit . is 4314 'eitle 'pyiiftifskit *Mild like a redundant population. tre-st • . -. te ,sitit . :tay.:o4ethia Oa* k - c610.11 . 41* , tha B il l at an ezeilletit stints ..:41git,VerIV I, . l ert t kew r 'if tech iti&dilikelfiVt .• 4 wag agt 'die to Mae Aphos i a t, : - r Ibe iit - 4L bipike'it, AA Utiretiifik :- . • it *sat been 'ickbltspwtried by I too ..:*: . -‘°.• ivUs wan vilo - tagetweritsihticie ;, itiniers, it it,Oul4l bleeireenpil ':," . 'Y Jiirtit %tie Test fiffir'ciiiihil did. ': are iimi of 446 Wertstilal ''• liiiik :iiiAriiiniViPikii V'te t ba . ; • . ''. - .41:01* VII *bald V* *eel M e . - ..` Lie Vii . o bi - ih4 a, I . obii44 therothub Ca.littt • - R yon r ' ' 'is this * ft-iftkong 'tbst Nip rests :poisesied is innil • -*it M.." 1 ke,t.,Willt.F4Al4lehee ~ . ftecholdOsnisoNg **4o ofi r ctet 2l . ou i l iaia 4 7 . "in ars amen • • • 41411 wi Oskar 40 :1111IP *IOWA is amioss as any Noble Loodpiallia= to base theist and. - thigetote, •he *ls' *sift • - . N. ... . . . . , , ..- . . remedied; bat V 6001400( steels that kipabete. arsimafigent, independent, the idiote qnes irs, that *receive seassistince from the poor flell w b m ot are, aday itatbadbdiallOg 9410f . f4raillt:nias upon that o . oa I tan mole/ their families, unless they helot% "mu • a id dilltroy.q. ' Jtogether, lith Verb *measure e ;Ctbet win been seen that i ilitid, acrd are on active service. I beg yew OM! at Medi/bar .: k. was not'lsis z4bis only r Oats, • Ist i it' d ivitisii he indifference is tttctiegpitre those freeholder : with the lefty, avt# 0 10lat t mess . 'the w tsrhaAsenty instead t.tft u , ' wretabjal Mother point m rr_ld . . . ersef ',elan and in order gain irons * not o it. "He opposee4t v on piincipie, and nit and dependent* bf t 'of Oyes/rob* s people (the (oily tdships an. r irdarnT4o, -- I"ab'3t3nara - principW stlone•-he-woeldi: timed:leer- move as an let them entirely _unfit to blect the representative. of Owl, own. but Linilstilei ft statement of•Aholi'whlfreetelitelr Amendusent : tetbe.Noble-Deke's motion, that ihaitill of the ,kingdomi. He looked upon - this: measure es, a .bY.tlteir landlord ,A 1... f:.l.naeli In thib Visrth of 'ream!. in the should be read a a ttend :tiers that daj.sia months. judicious•follawing•ep of the Sub-letting Act. Some 'while. in Net. th _. _a • • - ---- ' I