Star. — London, England, 1820-09-07 00:00:00

. I _ T w . . " ~. T AT • _ . ~. le j , _, _ & I._. -N o ... -- , --t.4r--e f - - . - ""'" ..--g e ' ..• N. . 4, f a r • . .i... I k -,1... . . ~ - .....,, 7 , ,i , b....- , 4 • . NO ..- • 0 11 7 74 .: i f 11. ' . • /14 iilk) ' • 'IV f . '' &".. --... 10 ,, or et . , • , 7 - e- -iv (T # 1 ,1 1116 11 4 j . t . - Oli : 0/ 6' 44 . : ~.f .ar ,_,,,„......-,•, ~..... 4. 1 1111 i pr.. . oir zb• • , . -.. , -V - -.16•11. 3-93-Ig. .f/matc __ . / 7 71 • % Nu .ItEit 10,464. EAST-INDIA [MUSE, September 6, 1620. THE COURT of DIRECTORS ?f the UNITED COMPANY o f MERCILIXTS of ENGLAND, trading lathe EAST-INDIES, do . 7 :eref,:i gire Mike, That a GF.NERAL COURT of the said Company will be held at their House in Leadenball-street, on WEDNESDAY, the 11th April, Is'2l, fer the ELECTION of SIX DIREC TORS. for Four Years. JOSEPII:DART, Srcretara. GUILDHALL, LONDON, AUGUST 24, Isso. PFIE COMMITTEE for LETTING the CITY'S LANDS will meet at Guildhall, on WEUNESDAY, the 15th day of September next, at Twelve &Clock at Noon, to SELL by PIRILIC AUCTION the Office or Place of one of the four ONION and FRUIT M FUR s of the Cit 7 of Lon don, occasioned by the death of Mr. John Nash. The Particular and Conditions of Sale may be seen on appli cation at the Comptroller's Office, Guildhall. 305. 13[3811 :1I AN, Comptrolkr. TRIAL OF THE QUEEN. EIGHTEENTH DAY-IN CONTINUATION. HOUSE OF LORDS, SEPTEMBER 6. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, he did not place a high ',Joe upan his own opinion on this subject. It was safer to act upon the general opinion of those who were conversant with such questions. lie, however, thought that the House was en tithki to have the wind:, conversation stated. 'Lord ERSKINE was of opinion, that the house ought to adopt the opinion given by the majority of the Judges. /.ord PA/ESL/ALi . said, the witness was sworn to tell the tenth, the whole truth, :rd nothing but the truth ; and that it was probably while he was proeuedin,z to tell the who truth the interruption had taken place. A witness, if he gave a partial are.ver might be exposed to a prosecution for perjury. And an interruption might have beer. the calm of his net having told the whole truth. Ile conceived it to be their Lordships' duty to endeavour to extract the whole truth 3.) far as affected the wit ness, otherwise he rolglit be hereafter accused of concealing pert of the truth. I: would be found that this w:tness had, in the course of his cro.3-exantir.ation, misunderstood a question, and the answer to th.tt question,• upon the re-clan:illation, was at variance with that which be had giver. before. He should con ceive himself competent to put a question to this witness for the pv.rp Ise of extracting thus whole truth. The LOUD CIIANCELLOII then put the question--Whe thtr it was the opinion of their Lordships that Counsel should be called in, and informed they were nut at liberty to put the question? The question was put and carried in the affirmative, without a division. Counsel were then called in, and inrormcd accordingly. Ezionitinfion of Signor Bacon remmed. You stated that when yob came to this country you a:mimed tiv: name of 31thini. I wish to ask you the remain you assumed that name ?—I took that name on account of the tumult that had taken place, and the danger that I should run if I went tinder my own name, knowing that I should be known. You said you took another name. When was it you assumed the name by which you now go?—immediately after the bu siness. or the affair that happened at Dover. You said you took oath to your deposition. When was it ?—I do not exactly recollect ; it was about two months a;o. On what occasion, and fur what purpose were you sworn to that deposition? Mr.lluoucn.or. wished that the occasion should be first asked. On wha: occasion were you sworn to that deposition?—lt was proposed to me by the Advocate, Powell. For what purpose? _ _ . . Jr.l Uno;:unast objected to this question, as a deviation from t! , e estabikhed toles of evidence. The LORD CII:IXCELLOR overruled the objection. For what pm pose were you sworn ?—lie (Powell) told me that he had received a letter from Lord Liverpool, who said that it was necessary to take the oath. Eruninsed hy Lord.hips. Parl r: T? OSVENOIL—fou have described yourself to be ar Officer in the Army. Do you receive any pay in copse sprence ?—! have no pay. When you ware discharged from the Revolutionary service lad you offered yourself to any other service as a soldier ?- -After three years I asked to be taken into the service of the fievernment of Switzerland, who had engaged to furnish troops for the King of Frarce. What answer did von receive to that application?—As I stied for the s.nne rank of Officer which I had in tl:e Army in Icily, so it was mentioned to me that there was no vacancy. Did they offer you any infer:or situation?—They offered me the rank of Serit:ant. Is it customary for persons holdior the rank you held in the service of the Princess, to draw the curtains of the carriage without obtaining permission, and more particularly in the case of persons of the high rank of her Royal Highness 2 As every morning I went to see if her Royal Ilighness had any orders for me, so I found sometimes the curtains drawn, and sometimes open ; and having withdrawn the curtains sometimes, I was never reprimand. d by her Royal !Ugliness for so doing. By Lord GROSVENOIL—Do you know that Mr. Crouse is a friend of Mademoiselle De Mont ?—I have never tried to search into other people's business. Are you yourself a friend of Mademoiselle De Mont ?—Yes, I knew her at the house of her Royal Ilighness. Do you know whether site ever assumed the name of Coun tess Colombier in Inndon ?—I Ic;low she had assumed the name of Ozlombier, but not the title of Vouatess. Do you not know whether she had assumed the title of Coun selor in Frith-street or in Oxford-ttrt:et?—l have said that I never knew of her taking the title of Counzess. The witness has said he latterly assumed a name which he does not wish published—l wish to know if he has any objection to state to us the number of names he has assumed during the hst ten years ?—I never changed my name before I changed it the last two times. 11y Lord KINGSTON.—You have stated that no ore has ofTered you any money to give evidence in this case; I wish to know whether any one bas offered you any money, or endea voured to persuade you not to give evidence, since you came to England one hi.% ever made me a prunliz_e of mon e y, nor no one has ever endeavoured to dissuade me from coming, bccr::se I never communicated this to any one. By the Marquis of BUCKI NG lIA M.—llow long have you beet acquainted with Marietti?—Since my arrival in Englaud. is he a banker at Milan?—l know, at 31ilan, the family of Are they hankers?--It is said that they are bankers; but had never any business with them. Who is the Marietti you are acquainted kith in London ?—I letve known three brothers Marietti in London. You bays said, that ore of the Mariettis knew of your being witness in this cause ?—I have said that Blarietti imcw I was a witness. Did any of the Mariettis you arc acquainted with in London znzke any proposition to you touching the evidence you are to give in this enure?—Giuseppe Ilarietti came to my lolgings .oe day, and said he wanted to speak to me. lie told me that Mr. Brouitham, the brother of the Attorney-General of the CLaetn, had called on him in the morning,andenguirtd whether k e c km W me witness). Itlr. Marbad answered that his si".l; then the brother of .I.lr. Brougham asked him whether ho mi;ht he a!)le to learn from me something relating to her 114esty? Mr. "Marietti then mid to me," As Messrs. Ikmaghans . Eve t!;:rie ore soLic scrykes whilst I had some transactions her Royal Ilighn.ss, I should like to do them also some service. liewevcr, bet*.ire I communicate to you what I b.ve got to; •.v, I must begin with telling you that I come as a friend, and;; not todisstiade you from doing as you have resolved." I k also' assured me that he did not with use to say anything than would either anomie myself or any other parties; an. he ad 20.1, that a list of witne:scs, and the braids of the charges the Queen not having been granted, " we should 1 to know soinehlog from you, vielu-.her anything c: the witncsocr, Lauber, ur anytiaing revecting the dc.. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, I S2O. positions they have made." Then I answered,that though I knew something, I would never tell it, far it would commit me; that I knew only one of the witnesses; that I did not know the de positions of any of the other Witnesses ; and that I could give him no other account. Mr. Marietti then added, that it was wished to know so much, because the Queen might prepare her own defence. Afterwards he asked me, whether I might know something concerning the depositions, repeating his assurances that he did not wish me to commit myself, or any of the parties. those quarrels ?—Hcr Royal Highness always she xed satisfaction at my conduct. Did she promise you any certificate of your good conduct ? We did not talk about a certificate. The Arroatow-CENsant. then shewcd a paper to the witness, and asked him whether he knew it WC be the hand-writing of Schiavini?.—Witness-As far as I know, it is the hand-writing of Schiavini. Have you seen him write?—l have also received a letter from Mr. Scbiavini. Did M. Marietti, at any time, give the witness any advice as to the evidence he was to give in this cause ?—Never. Did Marietti oiler you any money ?—Never: The Marquis of BUCKING HA M here asked her Majesty's Attorney-General, if there was any other question which he wished to put as to this interview, and he would willingly put it? Mr. linounnast said there was not. Ile bad no reason to be diasatisfied with the answers already obtained, though others might be. Lord GREY—Did you ever go by the name of Milani befort! you came to England ?—I took it at Paris. In what year?—Four or five weeks before I set out for England. When was tbat?—ln July last year. What was your motive for changing your name at that time? I—l was known in London under my own name ; and in conse quence of the tumult which had happened, and of the darter I should have run of coming in my own name, I changed it. What rumour induced you to do so was warned that the witnesses against the Queen might run some risk if they were known. liad you been informed that they actually had run any risk ? —They had not run any risk. ' Having stated, in a•former answer, that you changed your name on account of a tumult that had happened, I wish to know what you mean by that tumult? While I was at ! al Gentleman came, accompanied by the courier, Crouse, and this Gentleman told me that it would be necessary to change my name, because ft would be dangerous to come to England under my own name (having told him that I was known in London by my own name), and that already something had happened on their account, not . on my account, but on account of other persons. Have you seen him write ?—Several times. Do you believe that to he his hand-writing d o. The LORD CHA NCELLOR stated, that application had been made to him, staing, that one of the witnesses for the Queen (Lord Frederick Montague) was abroad, and in such a state of health as not to be able to come over to this country. It was requested that the House would decide whether or not that person could not 'be examined abroad by some authority in the shape of a Commission. Now in Ireland there had been lastanceseg such things, and if the parties upon both sides would agree upon the subject, their Lordships would probably have no objection—(Hear, hear).—He should not now expect an answer from the King's Attorney General, but to-morrow morniu,g he should communicate the application to him, and the House would expect that he would be prepared with an answer. Roster Haaz, examined by 1k: ArTOINry-G£%art AI. lie said, he was cashicr in the haniting-house of Messrs. Cootts and Co. thirt , ..n years. filer Royal Highness kept cash in the house of Contra and Co. previously toter going abroad. lk had paid her drafts, as cashivr. Here . a paper was produced, and the Arronstcr-GiNsitas asked witikesa whether it was the hand-writing of the Quee■?— I think it is the writing of the Princess of Wales before she was Queen. _ Cross-ermined by Mr. 13ftorcttAtt. has seen the hand-writing of the King, and believes he shou:d know it. The Socterroz-Gxxxaat—Have you ever seen the King write?—Never. • Hour do you know his hand.w•riting?---I only saw it in the Commission. llave you any other knowledge, except from papers shewn to Did hi tell you of a tumult that had taken place?—He told me of some disorder. On what occasion did he say that disorder had taken place? —He told me no more. What do you mean by something happening on account of " other persons ?"—The Gentleman mentioned to me that som e disorders had happened in regard to other persons, coming to a similar cause. What do you mean by a similar cause?—l have repeated what the Gentleman told me. Did you understand it was with respect to persons who had come to give evidence in the cause of the Queen ?—I believe it was on this account. Did you know at that time that any witnesses had come over to give evidence in the cause of the Queen?-1 did not know with certainty. Where did you lodge when you first came to England Sabioniere's Hotel, in Leicester-square. Etrl of DARLINGTON.—What was the cause of your being discharged ?—A quarrel with the confectioner. In what capacity did you live in England with Mr. Godfrey? —1 was in London and sought a place, and it was proposed to me to go to Mr. Godfrey. Witness spoke of a ball at the Barons, was it previous to the Princess going to Turin ?—lt was some time before. you Mr. Bitouratisst—t.Did the King, when Prince of Wi!les, keep cash at your house ?—Yes; but he was not accustomed to draw himself. The ATTORNEY-GrNIRAL then handed the paper to the Inter preter. It was dazed Pesaro, .Ith Nov. 1817, and was a Certi-• fice.te of the good conduct of Sacchi, and was signed by the Princass of Wales. The ArTmuszt-Grriert.tr: then said, he had to propose to put in the certificate of Majocchi, which is signed Schiavini, as Marshal to the Palace. Ile thought no objection could he taken, as Schiavini was an authorised person, and had been in the habit of granting certificates. Mr. BROUGHAM contended that no proof had been given thpt SchiaviniQrsti been authorised to give such certificate, and of course. the document could not be received in evi,tence. The LORI) CHANCELLOR was of opinion, that there were not sufficient grounds to thew that Count Schiavini had a general authority to give certificates of character. The House assenting to his opinion, The LORD CHANCELLOR pronounced it to he the opi nion of the /louse, that the certificate could not be prod aced. After a considerable pause, the AITORSEY•6IINERAL rose, and said that he had' an important application to make to their Lordships. There were certain parties, who were to have Marquis of HUN fLEY.—When the Count Schiavini gave you your discharge, did you not receive a certificate from the Princess ? Baourmest objected to the question, as there was no proof of its having been signed by the Princess. The Earl of LIVER POOL was of opinion, that their Lord ships, as Judges, could put any question that might be put by Counsel, either in examination, cross-examination, or re-eau minat ion. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought that the question could not be put until proof of the certificate being the writing of the Princess had been adduced. Were you a private in the army, and were you promoted on account of your merit was. Lord F.'tLMOUTH.—How long did the Princess amain at the balls at the Ilarona generally ?—Her Royal highness bad her own apartment contiguous to the ball-room, into which she came fox two or three minutes, and then went hack. You have stated that the women were taken out of the bill room at the pleasure of the men. Do you know whether they were so *len out with the knowledge of the Princess ?—I never mole the observation. Did you consider yoarself entitled to mix in these balls ?—I did. Did the witness, or other servants, invite their friends to these balls?—As far as I am concerned, no. As to others, I believe not. I suppose the Princess, or some one for her, invited the cons pany?—Certainly. When yon left the service of the Princess, had you had a ret. cent quarrel with Bergarni?—/Viut ricork ! The Earl of LAUDERDALE—Do you speak or understand French ?—I do. Was the speech made by the Princess, at the Ilarona, in French or Italian 7--Her Royal Highness spoke to me always in French. In what terms did she address you in French? I fere the witness gave the Princess's answer, in had French, which was taken down, and produced some discussion among their Lordships to its correctness. been produced as witnesses in support of the Bill, who resided at Lugano and its neighbourhood. Three of them had set out for this country, while others were on the point of setting out. These three persons hating advanced as far as Beauvais, two stages on this side of Paris, a rumour reached them that several persons who had preceded them, to be witness, s against the Queen, bad been extremely ill-treated at Dover. The conse quence was, that they went before the Magistrates at Beauvais, and made depositions. that, being apprehensive of their personal safety, they thought it not prudent. to come to Ene,land. These depositions were forwarded to this country, and the parties themselves actually returned to Lugano. As soon as infor mation was received here of the circumstance, persons were sent in all haste after the witnesses, in the hoke of overtaking them, and prevailing with thew to come over. The effort was however unavailing ; the persons had reached Lugano be fore the messenger came up with them. On Monday last, how ever, letters had been received from Lausanne, which is in the neighbourhood of Lugano;. from which there was reason to en tertain a confident expectation that the witnesses had changed their determination, and that they would in fact set out for Eng land the day after the 29th of August. Since Monday, no farther tidings had been received of them ; but there was every reason to believe that the persons alluded to were now actually on their journey hither to give evidence at their Lordships bar, and every probability that in a few days from this tine they would actually arrive. Under these circumstances, the Learned Coun sel thought he was not asking too much of their Lordships, in applying for such a delay as, in their Lordships' judgmeut, would afford these witnesses an opportunity of appearing before their Lordships' bar. Mr. Bitovsnaa: protested strongly against any delay. Tne application was whofiy unjustified by any analogy to the prac tice of the Courts below. A party might there apply to have a ttial put off on account of the unarddable absence of material witnesses, but it was a thing never heard of, that after a trial had once begun, any delay should be interjected in completing the case for the prosecution. When an application too was made . yuu sec these virgins at the balls after the Princess had said this to you, and was she present?--I do not know of what virgin you speak, or in a general way. In a general way ?—Yes. And the ban. were attended by the same persons?—Nearly. What sort of a carriage was it in which the Princess and Her -72111i were when you saw them asleep? Was it a carriage iu which one could or lie down?—The Princess had always three or four carriages; did not know. Do you know what sort of a carriage the Princess was- In when you opened the curtains?—Nun mi ricordo ! Had the Princess more carriage. that one with curtains?—l I believe she had two. to put off a triaf, it was upon afficlavit; . b.bth as to the mate riality of the witnesses and as to their utter inability to attend ; but here all that their Lordships had was the bare statement of his Majesty's Attorney-General that so and so was the caq:. The application was the more objectionable that the prosecutors in this case had had their own choice as to the time of pro ceeding with their case; they had been months and years pm, paring it; and even after othe Queen had, by Message to the House, demanded to proceed instantly, they had taken three weeks more to complete their preparations before they would proceed. The delay of these three weeks had, moreover. been accorded, on the most distinct understanding that, crape 17th August, the prosecutors wonl.l be completely ready to jo on.— _ _. • PRI( ESEA.: T . ' E. lowed to us to state that any of our witnesses h ,v, :•. n pre vented from-coming, by rumours of d threatened application of : the Alien Bill to them, by rumours of the interfeienze of fo reign Governments to prevent their coming, or by the exertions made by Ambassadors at foreign Courts ? My Lords, such an application, pending a trial, is a l toget h er without precedent, and the agreeing to it would establish a precedent the most perni cious that can be imagined to the administration of justice. The ArroaxEr-Gootaat—My Lords, I have to complain, in this r tl ,s case, of a misrepresentation on the part of my friends on the other side, of the objects of my application to your Lor dships. I did not make that application with any view, as my friends st:.te, of patching up the case. The witnesses whom I stated that I expect, form a part of the original case as handed to me. I trust, therefore, that your Lordships will not refuse this application, if being of great importance to the ends of . justice that the short delay which I have asked for Arnold be granted. I have already stated, that these vsitresses may be expected in the course of two or three days. The LORD (*EI ANCELLOR thought it a question of great importance; and that if such au application was agreed to with out sufficiently special grounds, it inUit be of dangerous conse imence. Ile therefore thought it most material that the proof of the grounds upon which this apphe.tion was made should be made kncwn, before he gave an opinion as to whether it ought or nut to be a c ceded to. The Earl of LI VER POOL observed, that the witnesses who were expected, it appeared, formed part of the original case; as he distinctly understood from the Attorney-General that what they were to prove formed part of his opening. It shiiuld there fore he rte , ;:leeted, that the case for the Bill was not, in f.:ct, closed, as under the permission of the House, the Counsel for the Queen had the liberty of postponing the cross-examination of the witnesses for the Bill; and until that cross-examination was Stiiihed, the case for the Bill was not closed, nor could the summing up take place. Lord ERSKINE felt it impossible, under any circumstances, to consent to this application, which was monstrously repugnant to every principle of justice—(Hear.) He did not at all agree with What had fallen from the NoI , L Earl; end it was not be cause the Queen's Counsel might not yet have determined who. ther they would or would not further crirss-examine, that the Attorney-General was to be allowed to make nut . out a new case. What was now propos, d was nothing like an allowable attempt to support :he testimony of witnesses who might have Woken down in cross-examination: and who, from the beginning of English justice, had ever heard of an instance, after' a crimirial case had tr , zon, and, ab.:re all, a criminal case of this descrip tion, where the party, on acroont of any accident, how ever unforeseen end uncontroulable. had been permitted to add to his proofs by delay ?—(Hear.) lie could not }emit himself for a moment to deliberate on the question. In the case of the murderer of• Mr. Terceira', an application h•.l been made, before trial, for time to bring witnesses horn Liverpool to esta blish the insinity of the assassin ; but the Chief Justice of the Common Ple.is had wisely refused it; and what sufficient rea son had here been offered for st,ipping in the very midst of the proceedi•:g ? In a case of treason, what would a Judge say to .t deminid that the Jury should be allowed to separate, or be confined while the prosecutor was adding to the strength of his case by searching for new testimony? Ile hoped their Lord ships would not deviate here from the rules that prevailed in cases where the lives and liberties of their fellow-subjects were at stake—Wear.) If they did conseiit to this delay, all be could do was to enter his most solemn protest against a step most fa. tal to British justice !—(Chrers.) The LORD CIIANCELLOR thaught it would be better (it being five o'clock) to postpone the further et usideration of the subject till to-morrow. The Earl of CA RN.IIiVON suggcsted that some ground ought first. to be Lid for the purpose of forming the subject of diuussion to-morrow ; at present there was nothing but the ap plication, without-their knowing what proof was to be offered in support of it. The LORI) CHANCELLOR said, it would be impossiLla for human strength to get through this investigation, if suffichnt intervals were not given between the days' proceedings, parti cularly with regard to himself, who had so many other matters to attend to. Earl U REY expressed his perfect willingness that the Noble and Learned Lord should have thus'_ intervals of relaxation to which he was so well entitled, but it was most essential in this case, that before the House separated there should be some un derstanding as to what the nature of the proof was uponwohic% this application was to be supported; an application which he considered to be contrary to all the principles of justice, and which he trusted would not be agreed to by their Lordships.— As, however, this application was to he the subject of discussion to-morrow, it was of importance that the Attorney-General should be ealcd upon to state what proofs he had to bring ter ward in support of his application. With r.:gard to the' cre:s -examination by the Queen's Counsel (respecting which ha hit-ti the same understanding as his Noble and Learned Frieial), it would be satisfactory to the House if the Learned Attorney- General for the Queen could state whether he should now Imish his cross-examination, or whether he intended to postpone it till after the adjournment, wliichlt was understood was to take place, to enable her Majesty's Counsel to enter upon her defence. • The ATroacar-Gxestuit., being called upon By the Lord Chancellor, stated that he had a copy of the ',rotes verbal drawn up at Baauvais, in which the apprehensions of the parties were stated as tha reason for their not then proceeding to this coun try; and also the letter staling that these witnesses were to set out from Lugano on the 29th of August. The Sometroa-GCNERAL added, that they had all the materials upon which, in the Courts below, Affidavits might be , founded, upon which such Courts were in the habit of postponing 'trials according to circumstances. It not being the practice to make Affidavits in that Iloesc, persons were ready to swear in the usual form of these Affidavits, die they believed those witnesses to be material, and that they believed the facts already. stated to be true. Mr. Bacemmtm, being called upon by the Lord- Chance Heir, observed, that their Lordships would be aware he could only, under present circumstances, state hypothetically what w0 . ..1.1 be bis course as to the cross-examination. Assuming, lisrwever, that the case for the Bill was row closed, he should merely ; ealt back one of the witnesses, and having put to him three or f questions, his cross-examination would be at an eel. - ' 431. In either carriage, was it possible for i person to lie down?— I Was it, after all this, to be tolerated, that When the At- - Tht. ii torney-Ue•neral had Ong through all the evidonce, he had torro . w (this) morning at Ten o'Clock ouse then Adjourned, at nearly helfspeptoliive s enikeppe I believe that one might. Do you recollect whether the Princess and Bergami were sit. at hand, and found, doubtless, that it had failed to establish n • titre or laying at the time?—They appeared to me to be sitting the case, he set out with the promise of proving, he should nowt I / Was anybody else in the carriage but liergami and the Prin. ask their Lordships to stop till he could patch up his case with Before the re-admission of strangers, the: the division 181160 cess?—l have said that Ido not know. It is not at present in these Luganians, said to be, and only believed to he on their road Lords yesterday, 14 on Lord Retivors's motion, my mind. hither? Was there any thing like teleplay in this? Any thing I•lerl DARNLEY cbserved, that as an a ccoun t o f the Pecti- Was the Countess of Oldi there?—l do not recollect. like equal treatment to the accuser and the accused? Any thing niary advances to the Que e n, wi t h a v iew to ena bl e h er M ajesty Were the Princess and nergami sitting next to each other?— like precedent or analogy to other cases of trial? If her Ma.. to prepare for her defence against the e i traor di nary charges of I saw them ooe by the other. - . jesty's Counsel had been the cause of any impediments thrown which she was the subject, w a s n ow to b e l a id b e f ore the House:. Earl of BALCARRAS.—When you had withdrawn the cur.: in the way.of these witnesses coming hire, that might have al- he thought it also desirable, for th e s ati s f act i on of their Lord. t., was the Priam* sitting on the right or left of Beigarril? • tered the case; !nit no such thing was pretended, or dared to ships and of the country, that the !l ouse s h ou ld b e i nformed of Her Royal Hiehaess wait on the tight. be pretended. He (Mr. IL) would not say ti.at the Leatned i all the expenses which had been incurred from the outset of the Was the aperture in the curtain on the right or left of Bcr- i Counsel fur the Bill would abuse any delay that might be ' unfortunate business whi.li at present so much agitated the gami?-0n the right. . given; his objection was to the principle of granting such delay mind of the Pobiie, and wh ch nittet so seriously aggrieve the Earl of ROSSLYN.—When you opened the curtaits_did in any case. The House must proceed , with a view to prece- feelings of every Noble Lord whom he had the honour to ad you ask fur orders?—No, because they were asleep. , dents and consequences. and they must be cautious least, in , dress. Therefore he liAt it his duty to move that an humble Ad- DM you awake :hem?—No, I did not. I granting the delay solielted in the present case, ii might not ; dress, S'c. " That there be laid before this House an account of Lord CA LTHORPE.--Did youash to see the Princess after i be made a Fee:dere for future appeations, made with no ' all Sums of 1 %"" - /' uspcntied in the Inquiry relative to her Me- Schiavini gave you your discharge ?—I asked to see her Royal other view than for the purpose of abusing it, and defeating I testy the Qieen, since the time of her leaving England, in 1814." Highness atter I had received the certificate, not before. the ends of justice. - I Lord ESSEX observed, th at h e s h ou ld certa i n l y vote fur the Did you see the Princess after you received it ?-IVien 711 i : Mr. DENMAN, before proceeding to support his Learned motion, at the same time observing, that if the Noble Earl (Li skied., ! Friend, begged to ask the Attorney-General at what tutee the verpool) would give that pledge to the House, that at a future Old you see her Royal Highness after you understood th o • witnesses wok their flight from Beauvais? period lie would lay before the House the whole of the expenses you were to quit her s.rvice?—l did. • The ATIORNIM-GENEJLAL.—On the 27th of July. Income' in this bust Ise ' 1 . , e oncluding that of the allilart Commission What passed an that occasion?—tier Royal Highness told Mn. Dasinsiee-My Lords, I may be permitted to add, that to from its first estabitslimeot, he (Lord Essex) would advise his me she gave me my discharge as a warning to servants, that grant the applies:ion now made by my Learned Friend (the t Noble Friend, Lord Darniey to withdraw his motion. Upon there should be no quarrels in the house. Attorney-tietienti) would be the highest degree of injustice. i that assurance being given, Did her Royal Highness state whet was the cause of the ' The prosecutor had ample time and unlimited means to prepare I Lind LIVERPOOL, in the fullest and most explicit mannet * ,quarrels?—Yes; my quarrel with the confectioner. his case, amid it cannos now be enduredthat he should come for- said lie would do so when the business was cencludesi, addi ng , Did she state any other caaae of dissatisfaction with you? ward with a statement such as' that brooole forward by my , that it would be inexpedient to make such a communication at ---No. . Learned intend (the s'etortiey-Gentrai), in order to procure de- present. • • Did you make any reply to her Royal Mimes.; on that occa- ' lay to examine more witnesses to patch 1:p his case. Such a I Upon this assurance, and in tSe hope of an ample and satisfac %ion ?—I milled to her itsyal Highness that I did rot believe proceeding 11*ln:rather unprecedented hi Courtsof Justice; hut ; tory explanat;.on upon this subj. : c at a future per. t oc l , -sort. it o i my fault to be sufficiently great to be - discharged fe - 4 it. tf delay is to ire allowed, on the ground of witnesses being , DAIMLEY said, that he should cenosit to withdraw his motion, Did site iiiake any allialdn'to your fernier conduct prevletis to frightened away by reenacts Pl . isimoou2l danger, will i: lee al- i which motion vs.. withdrawn aecordingly. . . k