Star. — London, England, 1827-02-15 00:00:00

e iit were undersigned. I thr dasTpAron!d heats it read. thou/Ni1 0... 44 t eves which induced the Right Rev. etitum Ism forward for the first ,p ' s wi7 li t i o li be t l e o na din the moat authentic foem to ‘ll. . ktk 'entertained on certain contro n , d'art Jan ars desire, by every means In their power, to contribute to theteace of the country. No person who knew that country would venture to deny, that without their iss- mount and unwearied exertions to maintain its peace, it would set fur one moment exist In Ireland. The Petition having been read, an objection was started to ka being immediately received, on account of its being writvn aw l separate 'beets, and the names consequently detached from the first, and on the suggestion of the Bari of Livenenot, the Mar quis of Lansdowne withdrew it, for the purpose of presenting it again some other day, When the informality should have hem corrected. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE then gave notice, that, on the 8:12 of March, he intended to submit a pro. position to the House founded on that Petition, and trinved that their Lordships be summoned on that day. It wis probable, that before that day the question would have been discussed in another place on a simi ler Petition ; but he gave his present notice, first, be. cause whatever might be the result of that discussion, be was determined to Being the subject before their Lordships; and, secondly, because he felt that the responsibility of its not hay. ing been discuned last year in that House rested principally epee, him. It was possible that the day ino,lst be changed; but on some future day be should certainly move a resolution in favour of.con. l ceding the Catholic Claims. Toe Earl of WINCHELSEA - -sliould express his sentiments fully when that resolution should be pro posed. lie trusted, that before their Lordships con sented to admit the nap sts to the enjoyment of all civil rights, before they repealed the Test Act, and separated the Church from the State, they would deeply consider the grounds en which the wisdom of Abetr ancestors had excluded the Catholics from power. He also fels , no mill satisfaction, that when the discussion should open, the question would appear with a new and striking feature. He meant the hew IleformAtion which had taken place in many districts in Ireland, and which he trusted would ultimately extend over the whole country. He also hoped that the attention of their Lordships would be directed to the no small power which the Ca tholic Bishops and Priests had exercised during the last year; and be Mt confident that the House would never consent to desert that Constitution under which the country bad enjoyed so much civil and religions liberty. Viscount CLIFDEN hoped, as well as the Noble _ _ Earl, that the reformation which he had mentioned might extend, and that all the Catholics of Ireland might become Protestants. But the best way to obtain that object was to abolish those exclusive laws ; and j what danger could result to the Constitntion from the admission of five or six Catholic Peers to that House, j and perhaps thirty Members to the other? Had he', been born a Catholic and become a Protestant from' conviction, he would use the Holy Liturgy of the Esta blished Church ; but as long as those exclusive laws ex• isted he would use it in secret, and with locked doers. He would not leave his own people when discounte nanced, and under insult and injury. It was impossible to sty that such sentiments might not be in many Ca tholic minds and hearts. Besides, if they exchanged their faith during the existence of those laws, the ex ch Inge would be ascribed to undue motives or interest. Repeal them, and the change would become free and honourable. The Catholics increased every hour in strength, wealth, and education, and there was no chance of a general reformation nor of secure peace, till those laws which all Europe had repudiated were an nulled. If war came, let their Lordships look to it, (or dangers would thicken upon the cuuntry—nay, we had just been as'near war as possible. Had the French Minister, M. de Vallele, been turned out, the Aposto lies would have come in, arid the King, who he believed was a poor creature, would not have been able to resist tient. Once France and Spain at war with us, America would have joined them; and though Spain was at present a cypher in the scale, did their Lordibips think thit we now could retain Ire land with France and America against us?—lle Noble Viscount then presented Petitions from the Catholics of several Parishes in the Counties of Tipperary, Mayo, and Carlow, praying for the concession of their claims.—Laid on the table. 'The Duke of DEVONSHIRE presented similar Petitions from the Catholics of Bandon, Youghall„ and several Parishes in the creeny of Roscommon.—Laid on eh* table. The Duke of LEI NSTFR also presented Petitions to the same effect from the Catholics of the County of Dublin, the town of Oransrd, and several Parishes.—laid on the table.—Adjourned HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Sanwa took the Chair at four o'clock, when several Mem bers were sworn in. ' 'Mr. Amery from the Court of Ring's Bench, and Mr. Wattle from the Court of Common Pleas, severally presented Returns of the number of causes tried in theft Courts respectively during the last seven years; and Mr. Demob from the Dace of the King's V 4 m R eme mbrancer, presented a rn of the Aber of Bills in Equity, fi led In else Court of E uer during)* same period.— Ordered to he priMted. .. • Major PEELgstre notice that on Monday int he should move that the Committee on the NNW& and Lanstoffe Navigation Bali be an open Olaf. NNW eh S. RICE presented a de/tendon from H. Tuite, Esq. vho d.a y. ha returned eine of the ICal t ekts of the Shirs for the Coonty of . , that be did not intend to defend Ms Election. fat taking into consideration the Petition comploining gait : units, IDection for that potty, was the enlarged to the Ifetkitf Motifs. • 1 Mr. MASEEL }remitted it Petition from the Inhabitant' isottaskeldem 0( the °ugh of Nottltarninon' complaining of the Corporation l'althat rough for haying applied its funds to Elec. tlpn to be printed. 1 . The HooottrelkJffiember then ; y e notice of his intention to Meg forward a *fts upon the act of this likodtion on Wed. I needay neat. . 1 Mr. MA lIIIIIIT moved that amok laid before that House an 1 Altstrect of the Ifet Prodwe of the Revenue in the grs ending on th e sth of Jan i tz, 1 geU r 4--.7, together with a turn of the Charges of Co los; also for an Account of the trended Debt soda Rechetmot and Deficiency Bills outstanding on the sth of ' . January, In eats of tt years. Mr. IMiNCOSIIIMItod a Petition to present which he thought tintithd to the lierious comideration of that Houw. It was from i lb. Slilpown and Shipbuilders of tko port of Burlington. in the County of Y . It stated that a material and most unfavourable change had t n place in their situation subsequent to the alters. Linn le our m of commerce and navigation, and prayed the /louse to inept' whether the a - dverslty which they now suffered, was tl e use of that Accretion. lain UME observed that the distress of the shipping interest did not from the alteration of the Naviptiou Late, but frsm alivious tota ll y unconnected with that alteration. Mr. It ar COM BE replied, that the Petition with which hr had ,been entrusted went no further than to pray for an investigadon of ibeenbject. The Petition was than laid on the table,aad ordered to be printed. Petidens praying that adequate protection might be afforded to agriculture were presented by Mr. ikaCitaOrtsi from the town of Colston, in the county of Lancaster; by Sir Cnatecla Matinee, from the lower diviatoo of the hundred of Coitican ; by Mr. F. Amos, from the parishes of Pomfret. and Sherhoorn, in the West Reling.and the parish of Doggett, is the East liking of the county of York. Petitions praying for a modification of the Corn Laws were also gtesented, by Me. litacitanou, from the town Of. Rochdale, in Loneashint; by Alderman WOOO front the Journeymen Carpenters and Joiners of Birmingham; by Jlr. Her, frusta Me Borough of Linlithgow • by Mr. lions front the Inhabitants of Dundee; by !lie R. graOssaie, {tons the Magistrates and Town Council of Ddsack, in Scotland. Petitions, praying for the removal of Catholic disabilities, were pieaented by Mr. Jarnaoe, Irons the Catholic Inhabitants of the twins of Mallow; by Mr. Caut.rtrizi, (tom tee Catholic. of the town of Newport Pratt, County of Mayo; by Mr. Alas Etta Mont tie Pariah of Dann, and front the Parish of Grey in the Dona Edkemy; by Lord Curios from the Parish of Kilgal. kin; by Mr. S. Lea from the Protestant Inhabitants, altdaftstior ' from the Catholic Inhabitants of the Qty of Limerick i sled from 'the Patti* of C 0,.. Csiunty of Cork; ►y Mr. It. Fernstrom., fro m t h e p l ea t of Three and the Parish OlDreslar, la the County 'of Kerry; also from the Catholic Inhabitants of Namur and Nockehnore is t►e same minty; which were severally laid on the table and ordered.to be printed. Mr. MAXWELL presented Petitions against any further eon. cession to the Roman Catholics, from the parishes of IGigally, of' Dunmell, and of Arvagh, in the County of Cavan.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. HUME rose to move in pursuance to his notice for additional papers, relating to the case of Col. Brad ley. He contended that the papers which had been presented by the Noble Lord (the Secretary at War) were incomplete and . insufficient. The documents for which he should move were specifically referred to, in tho e already before the House. He then moved that a copy'of the commission signed by General Fuller, in virtue of which Colonel Arthur assume) the military command at Honduras be laid before the House, together with co. pies of the correspondence of Colonels Arthur and Bradley with the Colonial and - War Mice, as wall as copies of several other documents. _ _ _ Lord PALMERSTON would resist the motion._ Several of the papers for which the Hon. Member had Moved were really not in existence. In the disculsion which took place upon this subject previous to the re• cess, he bad shewn as he thought conclusively, and he hoped to the entire satisfaction of the House, that Col. Bradley had no just ground of complaint, and he then resisted successfully the motion * of the Hon. Gentleman for Papers upon the subject. In the course of that dis cussion the Hon. Member had been pleased to deny the existence of any commission confertitig aushority upon Col. Arthur, at the time he placed Colonel Bradley under arrest. He had affirmed the existence of such a :commisstoo. The Hon. Member and himself were thus at issue upon a point of fact, and he, deeming it most respectful to the House that the point should be set at rest, had on a subsequent . day moved for that very com mission, and for extracts from the letter of Col. Arthur in which reference was made to it. These papers were accordingly laid on the table. There never was a clearer case than th it against 'Colonel Bradley. When he thought he bad reason to doubt the authority of Cc.lonel Arthur. it was unquestionably his duty to write home for instructions how to act, instead of which he rushed iuto an act of mutiny. His dis• missal resulted from hisown statement of the transaction. His arrest by Colonel Arthur had been fully justified by a decision of the Court cif King's Bench inthe action,• by which, not satisfied by the judgment of the Com mander in Chief, he sought to obtain damages. With respect to the commission, the existence of which bad , been so much disputed, prybably the Hon. Member confounded it in his mind with the letter of service intoned to Col. Arthur, which had been antedated from the time when that Meer' was placed ou half pay. It was certain, however, that no Mb things could be more perfectly &night. This letter of license had nothing to du with the authority under which he acted at Hoo duras, and bad been issued ling after the decision of the Coon mander In Chief approving of that conduct. Mr. HUME s4id, that by the Articles of War the commission ought to have beets entered in the book of the Secretary at War. He wished to see an extract from that book ; and this was one of the papers called for by his motion. The commission to command armed' settlers, which was granted by General Fuller, was of a very different patine Imes that running in the usual form, and conferring the command over Officers and soldiers. He would be judged by any military man if this kind of commission,' which night be held by a civilian, would authorise him to. assume an authority over a regular Military Officer at the head of his Regi ment. Colonel Arthur's corps bad been reduced ; he was on half pay, and was only entitled to be considered as a civilian. One of the Articles of War enjoined, that every commission should be published at the head quarters where it was to be acted on; but Colonel Arthur had refused to make any such publication.— By an Act of Parliament of Charles the Second, no person had a right to give a commission except in India, conferring the powers claimed and exercised in this instance by Col. Arthur. Such commissions required the sign manual of the King. Toe Noble Lord bad said, it was on the representation of Colonel Bradley himself that his dismissal took place. if so, it would only be fair to lay that representation t dole the Hume, for that Officer positively denied having made such a representation. The Noble Lord had thought proper to consider it as a personal question between them. He utterly repudiated that idea. He was the humble tideo . tate of an oppressed and ruined individual, and was proud, and should always be proud, to fill that charac ter. But, however the Noble Lord might have thought 6t to treat the subject, he disclaimed and rejected the notion of its being a personal question between that Noble Lord and himself. This authority—this very clear authority—was such, that Colonel Arthur bad taken five months to consider whethet he should enforce it. If the conduct of Colonel Bradley in resisting it was to be held mutinous, thegreater blame attached to Col. Arthur, for not promulgating in General Orders the authority under whicb he acted. The partiality of the military department to caiond Arthur was evident. from its con duct on the occasion of the trial at law. Not only were the taw expenses of that Officer paid by Government, but when a verdict bad been obtained against hiss, be was immediately sent off in an official capacity to Van Dieinan's Land, so that Colonel Bradley was deprived of all chance of getting chin his damages or ex panses. He submitted the case of this meritorious and oppressed r to the merciful consideration of the Raise. Mr. Secretary PEEL said, that without meaning to undervalue the importance of this case, it must be re collected that the House had no time to spend upon any case which did not possess intrinsic justice, and he thought, that from the papers connected with this sub ject which had already been produced, it had been proved that there was no occasion for protracting the discussion, or for producing any other documents. He certainly thought that the point at issue between his Noble Friend and the Hon. Member for Aberdeen was, whether there was in existence a commission granted to M-jor Arthur. He had understood the Hon. Member to state most distinctly, that there was no such docu ment, or, that if there was, there were strong grounds fur suspecting that it had been fabricated. Now he (Mr. Pe d).was overwhelmed with astonishment at this statement of the Hon. Member. He was quite su'e that most Hon. Members, and that the House, would have given :implicit credit to the assurance of his Noble Friend, that the document was in his possession, and he (Mr. Peel) had not been mistaken. But what course had his Noble Friend, the Secretary at War, adopted? He had voluntarily laid the documents in question upon the table, and thus set all doubts at rest. Such WAS the state or the matter at its last discussion; but the Hon. Member had now shifted his ground, and contended, now that the commission was praducadoltat a commission, enabling Major Arthur to co 'inland all subjects of his M jesty in arms, did not warrant him in taking the command of the military. He (Mr. Peel) would assure the Hon. Member that he had perfectly I understood him, and that he bad not the slishtest what had said. He would pat it to the House to joage, whether he had not stated the question fairly, and ask whether the point at issue was not precisely as he bad put it ? Now, the question before the Court of King's BenCh was this, and• this Did the commission of Major Arthur warrant him in assuming the command of the military ?" The Loed Chief Justice had deliberately pronounced his opinion, that in point of lbw the commission did so warrant him. Mr. Justice Bslley and Mr. Justice Holroyd concurred in the sanwopinion, and Mri Justice Littledale did not dissent from the opinions of his Brother Judges- There was also another point intro:heed at the trial, which was this— " Did the disbanding of the Regiment at all affect the case?" and the Judges decided, that so long u his half-pay continued, Main. Arthur's authority was not affected by t►e circumstance of bib regiment having been disbanded. If the opinions of the four Judges of the Court of King's Bench upon legal points had any weight with the House, be ( Mr. Peel) should call upon Honourable Members to join with him in resisting the production of any more documents upon the subject. Mr. BERNAL was of opinion that a ease of hardship on Colonel Bradley had been made out, and if a remedy could not be found in that House, for his sufferings, perhaps the Right Hon. the Secretary of State for the Home Department would represent the case to his Ma. jest y, with a view of obtaining some mitigation. Sir H. HARDING E said, that when Major Arthur desired Colonel Bradley to meet at a given time in the Government-house, it was the duty of the latter as junior Officer, to obey him, instead of issuing counter orders, which must of course have a dangerous tendency. The first motion, for a copy of the Commission sent to General Fuller, was then put and negatived without a division. Mr. HUME then proceeded to make along series of motions for Papers relating to Colonel Bradley s case. In the course of one of his motions, the Hon. Gent. said, two Commissions were granted, and that the words of the Commission of which the House was in possession, differed from those used in the other. Lord. PALMERSTON said, there was only one Commis sion granted. Mr. HUME said, he could not take everything for granted that ht heard.—(A Laugh, and cries of Order). Lord PALMERSTON asked the Hon. Gentleman whether he meant to west that he (Lord Palmerston) gave him information that was untrue? --- 7ieBI4AIIR said. be was sure that the Hon. Gentleman could not mean to apply the observation be had made to any Mem ber of the Home. Mr. HUMS Mtended to say that the information he received seasetinsm turned out not to be correct ; and that be did not feel disposed to abide by general assertions, when be could ob. taiu documents. The motive was then negatived without a division; and Mr. Hams having made another of his list of voodoos on the same subject, Lord PALMERSTON said he rose now, not with any personal feeling, but for the purpose of giving the Hon. Member an opportunity of rendering an explanation to the Home more satisfactory than the one be had afforded. Mr.H UM E said, the course be had adbpted amounted to nothing more than a retaliation, for be could not help recollecting, that during the last meeting of Par liament, when he asked the Noble Lord for some peculiar information, his reply was, he did not consider himself bound to satisfy him (Mr. Home), but be bad no °blee d= to satisfying the Home. The NAM Lord having so declined acting as a Gentleman, be (Mr. Hume) thought his Lordship could not complain of this retaliation.—(Lend ales of Order, ostler I) The SPEAKER said, it was his duty, on the part of the House, to take care that its orders were complied with, and to afford Hon. Members the opportunity of correcting any disorderly expression that might escape them in the wai mai of debate. As regarded the Hon. Gentleman's first observation, he (the Speaker) was sa tisfied that nothing so painfully direspectful could have been meant as might have been inferred from the words used. He tmderstood from. the explanation af forded, that the Hon. Gentleman merely meant to say, he preferred authentic documents to verbal assurances, inasmuch as the assurance might be the peculiar con• struction of the individual, and persons might differ in their inference from the same document. If this was a proper interpretation of the observation of the Hon. Gentleman—and that it was the Hon. Member's so. quiescing silence warranted Mm (the Speaker) in asserting—lt could not have cast any imputation on the Nolde Lord. The last language used by the Hon. Member was, however, so decidedly disfirderly, that he (the Speaker) felt satisfied it could not have been meant. Mr. HUME said, he had been sometime in the House, and had never intentionally dont anything to give offence —(Hear.) He had felt it necessary to make motions at different times,which individuals might consider as dis agreeable; but he had always endeavoured to render them as little personally offensive as possible—(Hear.) What he intended saying on the present occasion was, that the manner in which he had treated the Noble Lord was similar to the treatment he (Mr. H.) had betore received. He should perhaps have said, that he thought the Noble Lord not entitled to courtesy, as he had himself refused to shew any.—(Hear.) The objectionable expression was, he believed, something stronger than he had intended.—( Hear.) The motion before the House was then negatived without a divi. Mots, at were all the others relating to the same subject. WAITS OP RIGHT. Mr. SHADWELL rose for the purpose of moving for leave to bring in a Bill, the object of which war to limit the time within which a Writ of Right 'might be brought. He did not mean to take credit to himself as the author of the Bill, Lord Kenyon having in 1783 framed clauses embracing the same principle, but which clauses were rejected in a Committee of the whole. House. The Hon. Gent. hoped, however, now when there existed not such a stiff adherence to what was merely old, that he should be more successful than was his Lordship. It had been decided in Cholmondeley's case, that no suit could be maintained for the recovery of land after the title had accrued 20 years, he should propose in his Bill that an adverse party must proceed within thirty years. As the law at present stood, a person having no title, merely for purposes of vexation, might bring his writ of right, and finally not even pay the costs of the suit : this he proposed altering. Again, though a person had been in-possession 59 years, he might he called upon, first, to ,hew his claim, notwithstanding he might be considered prima facie entitled frost the facts, to possession. He should also propose to remedy the roundabout way, in which irwas necessary to proceed to debar dower. The Hon. Gentleman then moved for leave to bring in a Bill for the limitation of writs of right, and to amend the law in respect to dower. Mr. LOCKHART approved of the Bill as far as it went, but thought it too confined. In his opinion, the whole law relative to the transfer of landed property ought to be amended. If an individual, should the Bill pass, produce a title 30 years old, he did not think that any Conveyancer, nor the Master in Chancety,would say that it was good, because it might inclose an anterior title—an accruing right might spring up 100 years old. So defec tive was the law in this respect, that out of every ten good titles, he did cot think more than one would be found saleable. Mr. BATLEY supported the motion. Mr. 1). %V. HARVEY thought the Bill too contracted in its nature, and said he should move for a Committee to inquire into the law relating to the transfer of landed property. Mr. HUME thought the law should apply to tithes, the title to which was frequently 450 years old—from the time of Richard 11. The law of Scotland relating to the transfer of landed property was so simple was worth three, four, sod lee years more purchase than Ragland. He thought the Hem limber had better mor e Committee on the subject. SH A DWELL, in reply, said ho armidered it quite so sd, vantageons to bring in 13 Us to rearm palatal evils, when th e , wept fully aaerrtaiued, as to reform an at once, through the tu.4 1 . 0% a Committee.—Leave glue& Lord PALMERSTON brieght up a ratan, a the amber of Ofsmrs dismissed the military SlTWiet it►ost Cast Mania The Ileum adjoined at Usk Alai. THE I4.VENING sTAtt. LONI)ON. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1821, STOCK EXCHANGF, TWELVE O'CLOCK. The veal panic which prevailed yesterday afternots in Consol market, and lowered Consols to esi for the Attain?, greatly subsided this meriting. Consols opened at 121, and; wards were done at Itti ; since which, they may be quoted at g, with little business doing at present. - . - - ACCOUIMS are La town frees Madrid, dated the 3.1 instant, et,A D: that Mr. Lasts had net left the capital at that date. There are also letters from Lisbon of the !7th ult. statini affairs were net as yet settled ; two thousand of the rebels again penetrated into the country, sod were determined their lives dearly ; but when the Constitutionalists spro u t ed them, they retired into the mountaine. Very little is doing in the Foreign market. Current prices : Old Spanish 124 4, bleeiean 691 69, Cashel,, bian 581 I, Chillan 37 39, Danish el 4, Peruvian 5 4g, per owe 77 76, Russian 90 fi, Greek 16 4, Ezzhecrer 55 • • PRICE OF STOCKS AT-TWO O'CLOCK. Rank StocklloB 3 / 4 3 per Cent. lied. 83 1 / 4 % 3 per Cent. Cons. 82% % 34 34 per Cent. 9054 31 per Cent. ReJ. 895 % 4 per Cent. New 97% % 44 4 per Cent.'lB26, 9844 1 4 • Long Ann. 19% 13.16 India Bonds 55 53 £l.OOO Exchei. Hills 36 33 I:500 ditto 36 SS 4:1(1) and 1:200 ditto 36 SS Cons. for Account 82% K 54 % FORRIGN FUNDS. TWO O'CLOCK. Brazilian Bonds, S p Ct. I Um Bdo t 828,11 p Ct. 604 Do. Acet. 651 Do. Ace. 11114 11 Buenos Ayres 800d5,6 p C. Peruvian [Madan p C. 34 Colombian floods, 6 p Ct. 5.5 Rule. lido 111112, i p C. 90 Wino 8d5,1824, 584 4 1 Do. Acct. 1. o. Acct. 381 I I I Span. Bongs S p Ct. 121 Dania* Bonds, 5 p Ct. 62 if 111 131 Ditto Amt. 624 62 Ditto Acct. lie Greek Bonds. 5 p Ct. DM* 520,114 Do. 8eed5,199.5. 5 p C. 16 l Fr. Beaten. Sp C. 101 f Ditto Amt. Rzekange, 25f 50c BRITISH AND FOREIGN SHARKS, TWO O'CLOCI. WAIL Tat% Colobblan 100 so 110 Peed La Paz & Perin. Aro. 50 os 'Hamm alma 400 150 19S AleliClll 40 so so Ada s Company 100 10 6 Fanner Forge , FI3IIII3AIT 12.—Five per Celts. 101 E . Three per Cents. 6111. 6k. Bank &ock, 1,990 f.— Kewanee' Rentes,l44 75e.—Royal Spanish Lams 514. Ezekanges: Lesion, Ooe Moo* 25L 4&. Three Maishoost. sof. r It is with much concern we state, that the report Mr. Secretary CANNING'S health was less favoprable yesterday. Up to that time, he bad been mending and on Monday he received a dispatch from LtsrearooL, which he examined, and returned b: messenger; but yesterday morning, although MI cretary CANNING had passed a good night, he reported to be , worse. Sir MATTHEW 'FISHNET Mr. lloaxars are in constant attendance.—Brii Gazette, Febritaryls. The letters received in Downing street to-day, that the pain of which Mr. Secretary Cavarso plained yesterday, was happily removed by an al cation of the vapour bath. At the Stock Fachaage, latest accounts say that he is considerably better. The Paris Paper s, u hid§ arrived last night, inclu. the Eloik of Tuesday, contain advice' from Mad the 4th, and from Lisbon to the 28th, both of w) present as favourable a view of the relations between these twb Courts, as could be expected. As there no particular allusion to the state of the Portug• capital, it is to be presumed that everything was fectly tranquil there at that date. From the silence which is observed respecting the rebels, it may be sonably inferred, that they were considered extinct a body, though they might still, in small detachment: furnish some occupation to the troops employed ag• - • them. The measures adopted and enforced by the nish Authorities have probably contributbd to prevent flame of rebellion from becoming wholly extinct, them in the end they must prove eminently conducive complete re-establishment of public tranquillity. now placed beyond any doubt, that between the pr sions and proceedings of the Spanish Government r is an entire uniformity, as the rebels are instantly, without any distinction of persons, stopped and armed as soon as they pass the frontiers, and are wards conveyed to a distance of sixty leagues the interior of Spain. This shews how idle the report was that Mr. LAMB had left Madrid; for whilst Spanish Government acts in the manner that have stated, that Gentleman can have no pretence for quitting his post, unless with a view to recre in which from the favourable turn that affairs , talon, he may indulge himself without any detriment the business of the mission. Spain has now far deemed the pledges she gave with respect to Portui having established the diplomatic intercourse between t two countries on its former footing, and having besides taken the most decisive measures against the Portut rebels. Her conduct towards England has been equally conciliatory, of which we need adduce no otter than the arrangement she has lately made with Brit. claimants, whose property bad been illegally captured Spanish cruizers. Such is the termination of arn.ed interference in favour of Poi tugal, which of our contemporaries in the plenitude of their wisdom, and the overflawings of their public spirit, have pleased to characterise as a mad crusade I We have received this morning the Alj.erseixe Leitung and other Gamut Papers to Sth a st. They an. 1114 t aes p I land Re t or , Ora l OM e as id. M , r 1 wer e it is - .aivelyt 11.1 eau, of eta/ h PIM L. caw moo P toot • se Lmt, Las to 2f,,,, qps cl at ese threl gado: toba ill, that Cap btu had of a I d to s t a ?kin load e d *At he Wow josh I. Par. Aft .33W. With bte is tl rece bra Sti seed sad the see and his 1 Nl wbw it a o s► del i the I l is COO told and of t to e its tttw *ll IL Sap.. Obis Matsu Leaden, tao lets iport of 4111 P Durable ; daily; ttrs 3 Lord the by the bib Mr. See pa he was Ilre ;Ey and right r, state, G cots- in s shi ige, the M. r. thi idrid to • fa which 111 *tweets here uue is e he g gr rat per- sir nce too tb be rea- tinct as aa against Ut be Spa- tia rent the lai though et ! no the & to It is t.l ypt pr ole s• there a r n s nd dir- e after- • les into report ilst the hat we i r l ea ten tio e n. e • 4 : s have nent to ally re- rtugal. reentbe besides 1, tursese ' equally r proof, British X ured by of our .b anme wisdom, re been :delta rog bey an.