Star. — London, England, 1820-10-06 00:00:00

":;- 'V .••'M r • qt . Oldrand other Italian' Gendewomen?—l did not see any pod- eider differenrl between her and ether Italian Gentlewomen.- I Eil of LIVERPOOL.--Did she appear to the Noble Lord from hir manner and conversation to be a well educated wo man ?—I know so little of her education, having had but alew words conversation with her at dinner, that I cannot gfve an -opinion ; my conference was very short; there was nothing re-' snatkable in her manlier. How often did your Lordship meet the CounteW - Oldi?—'rwice. The first time at the Villa d'Este, the second time at Milan. Did your Lordship then knoW that she was the sister of Ber gami?—Not to my certain knowledge before I met her at the Villa d'Este, certainly before I met her at Milan. By Lord ERSKINE—Your Lordship said, that you sew nothing in the Countess Oldi's manner that was vulgar had bad but a short conversation with the Constass.and observed nothing particular in her manner. By Lord LAUDERDALE.—When roar Lairdakilb dined with her Royal Highness at Milan,where did you sit?—On one side of her Royal Highness. Did Bergami, during the dinner, receive any particular atten tion from her Royal Highness ?—Her Royal Highness was chiefly engaged in conversation with myself. Did your Lordship observe bow her Royal Highness con ducted herself towards Bergami on either occasion on which your Lordship dined with the Princess?—Nothing particular, either time. Where did the Countess Oldi sit, when your Lordship dined with her Royal Highness at Milan?—On the other side of the Princess. Does your Lordship recollect who was present besides ? Lieutenant Hownam, William Austin, an Italian Nobleman, and a medical man. By Lord KEN YON.—What was the due of the boat in which your Lordship saw her Royal Highness on the Lake of Como?—lt was a small boat. Did your Lordship observe the boat mete?—l did not observe any particular motion, except in consequence of the rowing. At what distance was the boat lkom the shore T—Lcatinot tell exactly. It was at no extraordinary distance. Could you see both her Royal Highness and Bergami in it ? llis Lordship replied that he could not see them very distinctly. .By Earl BATtiuRST.—Did her Royal Highness introduce lice countess OW to your Lordship as the sister of Bergami ? No. Her Royal Highness introduced the Countess Oldi to me, but not as the sister of Bergami. By the Earl of DAR LI NGTON.—What did your Lordship observe of the deportment between her Royal Highness and observed nothing material. Were the garden and grounds at the Villa d'Este, to which your Lordship has already alluded, immediately behind the V;Ila? ...—The garden was directly behind the house, and the grounds were immediately adjoining. What was the size of the garden ?—T cannot exactly say ? Was it an acre ?—I cannot form any opinion. - - _ Ey the Earl of BELbIORE—Did Lady Cbatiotte Lindsay leave her Royal Highness's service of her ow* accord s or was be dismissed ?—She left it of her own accord. Did you recommend Lady Charlotte Lindsay to leave her Enyal Highness's service?—l After a short conversation, in which the Earl of Laviaroot., 0: Marquis of Lassnowts, the Earl of Batumi', the Loan cnaneausta, and Lord I.ll.rtsosouott participated, the last ques tim and answer were ordered to be struck out of the Minutes. I By Lord Ei d LENBOROUGII.—Did your Lordship make any particular observation on die manners of Bergami?—Only that they were perfectly unobtrusive, not forward or impertinent. Did your Lordship ever hold any conversation with Bergaml? Not particularly. The only time at which I was alone with Ber gagni was when he was skewing me the Picture Gallery. From the opportunities which your Lordship had of observ ing the conduct of lkrgami, did he appear to be inferior to the situation in which he had formerly lived ?---No. It did not strike me that he was. The next witness called upon was Lord Glenbervie. Ilia Lordship, who of course gave his testimony in the body of the House, was examined to the following effect by the Counsel against the Pill : Did your Lordship see her Royal Highness the Princeu of Wales at Genoa ?—I did. • Were you at that time accompanied by Lady Glenbervie?— I Did Lady Glepbervie form a part of her Royal Highness's ;trite ?—No. Did her Ladyship act at all in the capacity of one of her Royal Highness's suite ?—When her Royal Highness arrived at Genoa, . Lady Glenbervie and I were there. Lady Charlotte Campbell 01Q4 expected to arrive in a fella days. Lady Glenbervie, who . had been formerly Lady of the Bedchamber to her Royal High- mess, proposed to her Royal Highness, who had none of het • Ladies with her, to attend her as Lady of the Bedchamber until the arrival of Lady Charlotte Campbell. 1/id your Lordship dine at this table of her Royal Highness? —Frequently. For what period?—From the 6th March to the 17th of May I very frequently dined with her Royal Highness; but not every day. Did your Lordship during that time see a person of the name of 13.1-gami?—Every day I dined with her Royal Highness. . What u-ab the nature of the conduct your Lordship observed' her Royal Highness to pursue with respect to Bergansi?.—He gen:rally waited behind the back of her Royal Highness's chair, is the habit of a courier. I frequently sat next her Royal High nes 4 and saw nothing in her conduct to Bergarni but that of a mittre.vs to a servant. He often helped her Royal Highness an I me to wine. Did your Lordship observe the conduct of Bergami to her It lysl Highness?—lt was that of a servant to his mistress. Was it respectful and becoming, or otherwise?-1 did not see anything particular. If there had been anything like disrespect -I must have observed it. • In what year was this I—ln 1615. What company did your Lordship meet at her Royal High- ress's table during the period you have mentioned ?—Mrs. Fal conet and her two daughters, lieutenant Hownam Dr. Doi land, sonic Genoese Noblemen, among whom 1 particularly re collect the Marchese John Carlo Negria, Lady Charlotte Camp bell when she arrived, several Officers of the Navy, and others. Was Lady Wm. lientinck of the party?—Ai Genoa? At the house of the Princess 7—Yes, at a ball. Ido not re-. cohost whether at dinner or not. Did Tom Lordship meet at her 'Royal Highness's balls any persons of rank of the place?—Yes, many of the principal La dies and other persons. His Lordship was then cross-eras:bled by the Souctuta-Gi- VCSAL to the following effect : Your Lordship did not live In her Royal Highness's house? —No. When Lady Charlotte Campbell arrived, Lady Glenbervie's attendance on her Royal Highness eeased?—Yes. Upon the average, how many times a week did your Lordship dine with her Royal Highness---two or throe times?—Yes, clef tainly, or more. If 1 understandyour Lordship, Bergand wore a livery as a courier 7-11 e wore the dress of a courier, a fancy dress, a li very, according to my recollection. By the gad of LAUDERDALF.--Did your Lordship meet CiPtaln Peihell, of the Cloth*, at ber Royal Highness's table? think I did. kady Charlotte Lindsay was then sworn. At the request of Mr. Baotou**, her Ladyship was allowed a chair.: Examined by Dr. Lossmearmr. • Did your Ladyship ever 'fora a part of the suite of her Royal ilighntse the Princess of Wald?—Yes, I did. • • • When did you first enter • her Royal Highness's service?—l thhik in 1808. Did you attend her Royal Highness when she went abroad in 1814 ?—Yes, I did. Were you not one of the Ladies of her Bedchamber ?—I was. How far did your Ladyship go with her &lel Highness oh tint journey ?—I accompanied her Royal lbghiiesa as far as Brunswick. Why did you not go further?—it was not understood by tier Rayal Highness or by me, that I was to go fuither than Merely to accompany her Royal Highness to Brunswick. When didiyou again lee her Royal saw her at Naples, in the beginning of March, 1815. Did your Ladyship then ;et is eine of her Royal Highness!, Lldier of the Bedcharnbaff.l did. How lini! did • yen then ixestiniseirith her Re7/1 Highness ? I inined her Royal Highness in •tli , e 'beginnMerof March, ri thaine.d with het •at Naples till she left it, accompanied her to 8 0 ,, •::::.oce to CiritsVser.his; embirked with her on board the Clorinde, and quitted her at Leghorn, weeding to the arrangement made before we met. By whom was her Royal HigMess vtateil at Naples ?—By aq the English of distinction, and by the Neapolitarts and other foreigners. Can your Ladyship state the names of some of her Royal Highness's visitors ?—Her Ladyship enumerated a long list of ,p,arnes among whom were Lord and Lady Landaff , Lord and r Lady Conynghanse, Lord and Lady Holland, Lord and Lady Gage, Lord Clare, Lord Frederick Montague, Lord and Lady Goddard, Lord Granville Somerset. Mr. Davenport, and /tr. ailliim Bankes. She added that there might ir many others. Was her Royal Highness visited by Mta.Talconet?—She was, and by her two daughters. Was your Ladyship on board the Clorinde?—S was. Do you remember. where her Royal Highness slept on board the Clorinde?-0n board the Clorinde she slept in part of the Captain's cabin. It was divided into two. her Royal Highness, slept in one part, and the Captain's blether in the other. Did any one else sleep in the part appropriated to her Royal Highness 2—Yes, her Royal Ingham 's maid. Does your Ladyship recollect anything arising in co ot Ertme of the cabin having been thus divided ?—Nothing cular, except that her Royal Highness was sorry that the part of the cabin had not been appropriated to me. Did that occasion any difference between her 'Royal highness and the Captain?—Not that I observed. Does your Ladyship recollect a person of the name of Ber gami in her Royal Highness's service ?—I do. In what capacity ?—As courier. Had you an opportunity of seeing what'passed between her `Royal Highness and Bergami?—l was frequently in company with her Royal Highness when Sergami wait in attendance. How did be conduct himself to her Royal Highness?--In the common way of a servant to a mistress. How did her Royal Highness conduct herself to him?—ln the sante manner as &mistress to a servant. Did you ever observe any innmepriedes between her Royal Highness and Berganti?—Never. When did you quit her Royal Highness's service?.--In the year 1817. . . • What was your reason for t ieing se?—illy brother wrote to me to request that I would return, and I complied. Have you seen her Royal Highness since her return to this country?—l have. Cross entatilted by the Sotaceros-Gertaam.. How long was it, Lady Charlotte Lindsay, before her Royal Ilighness the l'rincess of Wales quitted Naples, that you joined her ?—Ahout ten or twelve days. How much time was occupied be 'proceeding from Naples to, Leghorn?—We were one night on our ourney to Rome, two nights at Rowe, six nights at Civita ' waiting for the frigate, and din; nights on board the frig" Your Ladyship left her Royal Highness's service at Inborn, and did not return?ert left her Royal Highnem's service at Leghorn; I could not.return. While you were at Civita Vecchia, did you see- iimiami? —Yes. Will your Ladyship try to recollect, if en any occasion You saw him walking with her Royal highness?—When her Royal Highness and I used to walk together, Bergami attended. lie was not with us, but at a little distance behind. Did that happen every time that her Royal highness and your- Ladyship walked out?—Every time, as far as 1 can recollect. Wu there any other courier in the service of her Royal High ness at that time?-1 believe Hieronymus was also a courier at 'that time in her Royal Highness's service, but I am not exactly certain. Does your Ladyship mean to say that Hieronymus also walked sot with her Royal Highness?—tic, he did not. So that on all occasions liergami walked out with her Royal Highness ?—Ycs. How often did yottr Ladyship walk out with her Royal Highness at Civita Vecchia ?-1 do not think I had the honour above twice. Will your Ladyship swear that it was not snore frequently? —I do not at this moment call to mind more than twice. It might have been three or four times. Perhaps your Ladyship will not swear that it was not five or six times?—Yes I can swear that it was not so many. Will your Ladydtip swear that it was Hot four times ?—I think not. Will your Ladyship swear, that on no one occasion you saw her Royal Highness arm in arm with Bergami ?—I do not re collect it. Will your Ladyship swear that you never saw them arm in arm ?—I can only say that Ido not recollect it. Beigami used to keep at a little distance, unless he was called to be asked a question. Then I am to understand that you swear her Royal Highness was never arm in arm with Bergami ?-1 do not recollect it. Your Ladyship will not swear it ?—I cannot positively swear; but I never was struck with it. If such a thing had happened, would it not have struck your Ladysitip?—lt certainly Would have struck me, if it bad hap pened; and therefore I think It did not happen. But you will nor swear that it did not hippen?—l will not swear: it midst have happened that her Royal Highness took Bergami's arm, but Ido not recollect it. I was not struck with it as extraordinary. Bat your Ladyship has just now-said, that if you had seen I . l . ergatni take her Royal Highness's arm, you would have been streck with it as extraordinary?—lf be had walked arm in arm with her Royal Highness. But her Royal Highness might have taken Bergami's arm ? She might, but I do not recollect the circumstance. • Your Ladyship filled the office of Lady of the Bedchamber to het Royal Highness ?.. = 1 Did not that necessarily lead you into her Royal Highness's bed-room?--Very fregeently; her Royal glibness used to send for me._ • _ At Naples?—At Naples. Was her Royal Highness always alone on those occasions?— Not always ; sometimes other persons were with her. Does your Ladyship remember ever having seen Berganti there ?--Yes. lier Royal Highness used sometimes to dine in her bed-room with William Austin, and Bergami used to wait as servant. Was that while you were at Naples?—Yes. Did any other persons besides your Ladyship , William Austin , l and her Royal Highness, dine in her Royal High.tess's bed ',room ?—No ; I thinknot. -I *lnk only we three. There were other servants. DM • *at happen frequently ?—Yes, whenever her Royal Highness had not company to dinner; except one day when I obtained leave of absence. to go to Pompeii. • Did liergami always wait on those occasions think be did ; but I cannot positively swear it. When did you quit the service of her Royal Highness?—ln the year 1817. . Had any application been made to your Ladyship to join her Royal Highness in Germany, before you had resolved to quit her?—Yes, there had. • How long before do not accurately remember. Was any proposition made by her Royal Highness to appoint Colonel Lindsay as her Chamberlain ? Mr. Bsocquast objected to this question. This was exactly the line of cross-examination (namely, with reference to the con tents of a written document, which document, if it existed, was the only evidence which ought to be produced) that the other side, after two hour's aigument, had prevented him from taking ; and he therefOre did not see why it should be taken by his Learned Friends. There was nothing at all in the question of any coniequenie ; but, as he had been prevented examining in the same way, he chose to object to it. The LORD CHANCELLOR was about to give his opinion (amid cries of " afifjourn" and " Go on"), when Mr. Brougham said, " I give up the objection ; anything to save your Lord -1 ships The LORD CHANCELLOR ;aid, their Lordships object was, not to save their dine, but to do justice. It the objection , was well founded, it could nut be given up by the Counsel, be cause it was the duty of the II to suffer no question to be Put which was improper. • He stggated that the House should now adjourn; and consider this point to-morrow. Thb House accordingliadjourned, at Four o'Clock, until to morrow (this day). CORD &CHANG; MASK-LANZ, Ocros'u' 6.—So few sales were I made of Wheat on Wednesday, that tie major part of what ap peared on that day remained over for this morning's Market; but the demand was so trifling that little or as progress was Made in `sales 'to.day, although an abatement of full 21. pew' quarter would have been submitted to ; but from ha general inferior quality no offers could be obtains& Having had but little Barley fresh in since Wednesday, that day's prices we supported for fine samples. Oata • are is. per quarter cheaper, and dull sale it that decline. Grey Peal are its. [ lower. In other articles there is no alteration. • Xakarr, (cr. 0,--Pricts the same as last sloet. • •1 NAVAL INTZLLIGENCE. • Extract of a letter fries Lisbon, dated the 10th alt.—" We have received letters front Bahia, informing us that the Den Affenzo was to sail from thence in canyon with the Milt Victoria, Nova Viogante, Vasco de Gann , and owe% two last arrived from India, and various vessels foe Pane The Milani, Weave= fronalverpool to Riga, was to tally lost, as the Coast of Ju tland, on the st3d ult.—Crew saved. The Beltk Merchant, ILavoseon, from London to Valparaiso, was spoken with on the nth of August, In lat. 9. 34. lung. ita. The Comet, BOAS, and eIkutta,STSOTAN, from LiverpoOt to Bengal, were spoken with on the 40th of June, in long. 90. W. on the Equator. FALMOUTII, Ocroaaa 3.—W ad 4.F.,—Arrived the Atalanta, Zwawassortrs, from Seaga for Amsterdam, with the lose of her top-masts, oom, sails, boats% staun cheons, &e. bowsprit sprung, and is leaky. PLYKOIMI OCTOSIS 4.—Wind N.E.--Arrived the Matilda, Smarm fr o m Memel; Lively, hirecnau., front New Provi dence for London • and the Aurora transport, fit Prtrorroorn, oZr:um 5.-Wind N. EF-Arrived of* Milos, the Orpheus, from Bombay ;, she landed her paseanowoltero. SWANSZA ' Ovr. 4.—The Hero, FLAIIIIIITY et and for with coals, has been driven back by the gale ' , >ls se wick strained as to require ber cargo to be discharged to repair. Cowes, Ocr. S.—Arrived the A)exander, Sumac, front Pi tersburgh for Litton. Dear., Octosaa s.—Wind N.E.—Cante down from .libe , River and sailed, the Royal Eagle, Galas, for Newfoundland. Remain in the Downs his Majesty's ships Consign-on, SO'S", and WYIL • HASWiC4I, Octoaza s.—Arrived the Beaufoy packet, from Holland ; and Duncan packet, from Cuxhaven, each with a Mail. Ammo—At Bilboa, the Mercury, Lisby ; and Horton. Hill, from Newfoundland. At Antwerp, Henry, from Bahia. At Gibraltar, Bencoolen, Anstice, from Bengal; and Esther, Wood, from Trinidad. At Marseilles, Mita Fournia, from Pernam buco. At Demerara, Clyde, from Liv erpool; and Ann, WiLin. de, from New Brunswick. At Trieste, Traveller, Andersoo, from the clytle ; Four Sisters and Canadian Packet, from Ber gen; and Fides, Allen, from Boston. Contne-liouss, Octanes S.—Ships Entered Inwards : The Frederick, from Memel; Amphion, from Griswold ; licks, , from Donnie; Jonge Reba, from Amsterdam ; OustatrucCarl, from Harlingen • the Integrity, front St. John's • London, from Hantburgh ; Stdolenski, from D.mtzic • Ant, (rem Hamburg's.; Gratitude, and Swi ft , from St. Petereburgh ; Margaret, from Antwerp, Maxwell, from St. Petersburgh ; Venus, from Surat sand; Catharina, from Riga • and the Arm, front Antwerp. — Entered Outwards: Two B rothers, for Hamburgh ; Change, for ditto • Dublin Packet, for Dublin ; Rachel, for Jamaic a ; Vriendscitaft, for Bremen ; Venus, for the tape of Good Hope ; ' and Wellington, for St. Vincent's. Clem.) Outwards Bom bay, for Bomba y ; Anna Dorothea, for Bremen ; Jeune Olympe, for *rues; Douro Castle, foe llarabusgh ; Deptford, for (Idiz; and Albion, for Gcpnt. THE EVENING STALL. LONDON. FRIDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1820. We are aware that, comparatively speaking, intelligence of any kind, excepting what relates to our perrzeitted QUEEN) excites but little attention at the present moment : or rather the deep interest which the Public feels in the trial of her Dianna. absorbs every other consideration. We must not, however, overlook the changes which are passing, and in quick succession ) , in the old Continental States—changes which ere long will put it out of the power of such persons as the Grand Duke of, Baden to interpose his purer to prevent, or withhold his an: dimity to insure, the attendance of a witness, whose presence may be required in any Court for the vindication of innocence. Iladliaden undergone that regeneration which Spain, Naples, and' Portugal, are now passing &rough, a Queen of England would not have applied in vain to have the Chamberlain of the Grand Duke permitted to appear as a witness on her trial. If such be the necessary fruits of that system, which some men would, by the term . , Legitimate," mark as exclusively worthy of sup. port, it is high time such a system were pulled up by the roots. A few more ttiab such as we have witnessed—some more examples of the interpoiition of the Legitimates to hinder or pervert jestice, will only tend to hasten the period of Its uni. venal reign. Bit to return to firer, events. The contest between the Regency of Portugal and the new Government has terminated as we expected it would. It will be seen by our accounts from that quarter, given in another co lumn, that, on the 14th ultimo, the military, marines, and litia at Lisbon declared for themselves against the old Regency, and instantly formed a new one. We are happy to add, that this great change has been effected widow bloodshed or tumult. H A private letter states, that the English were no way insuked ; but our military countrymen were desired not to appear in their uniforms. Intelligeme of the events that had taken plate at Lisbon was immediately sent of to the Oporto Jams ; and it was nadersenotl that the new Regency at Lisboa would only act temporarily till the Junta should arrive, which was expected by he sit, • The leader in the New Government is Principal Pam. (not Prince Fame stated lq the Paris Papers). Ho is a man of great talent, and cousin of Gauss Faults, the distingui‘ked °facer who died a martyr to his country's cause in 1817. Ile had been named by the Rio Janeiro Government as Patriarch of Lisbon, and consetptendy, President of the Regency, but this he refused to accept. Tide sheers the character of the individual alluded to more than sorbing that could be said of him, particularly, as the above took place about the time his cousin perished. He papooses the esteem of all his countrymen. Puna rm. Is an eminent dignity in the Patti- archal Church of Lisbon. Amo is a General of Artillery Count de Pm Fir is an extremely well informed man. Count de SAN PAN also beats an excellent character. BILAN. CAM' is an extremely rich man, of great Mint and court dons. The British Officer were well treated, and- ...rested only not to appear in their uniforms, to pretest all insult from the populace. It would seem that the late Regents have mot retained the good-will of their successors, if we may judge from , the circumstance of the orders Issued to the forts at the entrance l i of the Tagus, not to lot any vessel pass without special licence. The frigate Perla had been kept in readiness for them, as was' announced in Fosses Letter of the 9th to Count Patsau.a, so- licking ,him to continue to give his assistance to the Regency, and t; defer his embarkation in the Creole for Rio Janeiro. They and Count Astaaswrz will certainly cut a curious figure if they meet in any other country, after all they have done. The Portuguese Cartes will now, no doubt, be called in a regular and constitutional way. The French rams of Tuesday have arrived, The balletin of that morning announces that the Duchess and the Duke of Bourdon': had passed as excellent night, and continued both in good health. The King attended Mass, and afterwards I received the congratulation of the Military of Paris, on the birth of an Heir to the Throne. An artide from Vienna states4kat the Interview of Scorer eigns *I postponed tiN the end of this month. - Seaday beine the ay for swear* in the new Loan MAllla of klublia;tha accustomed peesontry usually Lo attendint epos civic hatters wee adkeredle by the an Maros and Smsour elect. Atawastsm A. A Kaa is Lpaa 111aros for doe Aftsing year, and Messrs, Wmirartrait and of are toe now flasairra, ~_ • THE QUEEN. • FOURTH DAY OF THE DEFENCE. HOUSE OF LORD& The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat on the woolsack at ten o'clock. Prayers having been read, the roll was called over. The LORD CHANCELLOR read a letter of apology from his Royal highness the Duke of Ydkx, who stated that he was so indiaposed, that be could not attend. The Marquis of LANSDOWN, then moved that Jusyl. Merida should be called • Mariette, presented himself at the bar. . The Marquis of LANSDOWN—" Mr. Marietti, h: vy• y, now brought the letter with you which you mentioned to tl, House yesterday you bad received from DI Alberta:ler Mastrers--" I have : here is the letter. I beg to mention to your Lordships, that, on going home yesterday afternoon, I found that I had been wrong in saying to your Lordships that sell the letters to me bad come by post. I discovered that on, of them, that of the 16th October, came by a private occasion. I hope your Lordships will excuse this unintentional mutate:' The letter Was handed to the Clerk, and Mr. Marietti wish. drew. Counsel were now called In. Toddler ireminatiot gf Ledy Ca (Juarez Lomsay. Dr. LUSUINGTOS directed that Lady Coasaorre Lanns.v: should be re.ealled. _ _ Her Ladystlp was handed to the Bar by Mr. VIZARD, Majesty's Solicitor, and, as on yesterday, indulged with a sea:. Oroaserausinni i ske Kima's Socienon.Gzszass. Ds► you know that there is a garden in the neighbourhood . Naples coiled IA Favorite P—Yes, there is. Did you ever walk in that garden with her Royal Highness' —Yes, one day. Was Bergami also present ?-11e *as. Did your Ladyship, in going from Naples to Rome, travel La the same carriage wish her Royal Highness ?—I did. Did Bergarni ride as courier during that jeterney?-11e Did you also travel in the same carriage from Rome ?—I From Rome to Civita Vecchia ?—Yes, I did. Did Ilergami also ride as coorier during that part of the jour. ney ?—I believe he did. but I am not so accurate in my Tv...A. leetion of this as of the former part of the journey. Do you recollect. during the former part of the journey, Bcr , gami coming sip to the window of the carriage and saying. .1 &v... ifartawie ?—Yrs, after he was called, when her Royal High ness gave him some of the provisions in the carriage, as ai.J something to drink. have you & distinct recollection that it was after be was that he came up 7-1 thiok it certainly was after he was called. Is there any circumstance which enables your Ladyship at pronounce with certainty that it was se ?-ICo. Merely becaLe it was more natural that he should come after he was caPpid. Then I am to understand that you hive no recoliccrion.rith.: . . one way or the other, and that your stating that it was afar : e was called is a mere inference from reasinil,4 in 'imp' Or. a mind,?—lt is : there was nothing Knack pie as piiiiculak in the circuinsa.au.,c. Wu there any bottle In the naafis* witlcli be/ !loyal MO. near banded i bottle of Wine. DA heedritik free tbOi . batle?-*-1 think he diB. ' From the bottle itself;nfiltent 'any glass?—Yes, I think • - Did he afterwards iittten the bottleto her Rani Iligiuwo? —I am not (Inks positive ; I fancy he did, but I ant:by to means positive. Her Royal Highness and I bad titbits our r. freshment before, but whetter be returned the bottle or three it away I cannot be certain. Although you are not certain, which way was it amorally* the best of your recollection ?—I rather think he remessid it t 4 the carriage. After yciu had made up your mind to quit her Royal ness, did you not state that it was a vast relief to your mind to bave come to that resolution have no recollection of kavis4 said so. Did you recollect ever saying ay:thine to that purpose sr of ?-..1 4 10 ; I migba have said so, hut Ido not . haw that I ever did. I beg to s,sk Tour Ladyship more pankcularly, whether, after You gad awns to the determination to leave.the .ervlce of tut Royal Highness, you did not say that k was a wan Mist soTcor mind, and that - yen considered that no woman ws had any fe gut to her character could retrain Id the sere* of her Roy Highnese?—eCettalnly, I 4o not rustolluet haehigneer stegedasy such thing in such Wands, Did you ever my anything to that eireet ! I raqi % Will you undertake to. ay dot 44 not state the Teri words flume now glade ass of 7-1 have no recollection el having Awed enT suds words. . _ Ant I then to understand, that you WM sot undertake to say that Tog dfd . not make lee of those very wordo-1 can say I did net awake use of any math words. Ido not tn.sadlett dot I did. The Souritana,Gamosat i . reputed the giseition. I can only say v it ft ems:early impubablo I shim* hue nude use 'of such words, I do sto u t asudioct that I did. • Your Ladyship will not ray that you did sot make use if them ?—I can only say again, tbat I ire no recollection, and . that I think it very improbable. Will you swear that you did sot Ste use of words to that effect more than once 7—l hue SW tledlectisa of having used words to that effect s •1. .;•• • But you will not undutaktiii-***l4lhildisot/—I on only say as below, that I haUsantitstillbililllkoi'llwiwg said s°, and Ido not think it protoblif.' - • • i* Do you recollect, When you quitted the 'Stroke of her Rola I Highness, saying this : that if you had not had an anxious desire to mist a particular individual out of the Savings of that service, you would have left long before?—lt is wry possible • I might have' said so, but I duel recollect An I did. Will your Ladyship sualenake to bay positively that yoo did mot ?—i can only say IlsaVsfolat.tht kilt recolleuion of Pavia{ said so to anybody. 1. *. 4 • Lusionsaux. The Sollcitas:Qmsoral aikaid your tadyshipwhother any Com. =sanitation had Ulm place at to year "aloud= ; to who was that cossosirdistion madeN—To' any husband. - To any ooit'elsaUTO no-obi el*. • - • Is Mr. LlodsaftspervOsilirdistraistauttostancea Has he been hag distressed circuotusoceir?-600se years • Have ever orry'dllicildestalen *bile you were in tar Majesty's service, u to thC paitneot of 'olio Ladyship's salarY? The SoLICIIOII-GXXCRAL objected to this qtaestion,as not ho ing any application to wharhad taken place in the course of tte ' . Mr. Baovonsx said it was-meant to shear, by that count of examination, that there existed entbarrasiments to tender ha Ladyship's stay in the Queen's service disagreeable. Dr. Losonsurom said lehod born attempted to its an 'inputs' floes upso Tier Majesty by the cross-examination. It became necessary to eiplain the reasons het Ladyship bad for *WI" the situation disagreeable, in *Order to remove any wrong ISt premien which might be received to her Majesty's prejudice. Lord LAUDERDALE-For the sake i order, the wls.. V % Psis avail Irani `el The So Counsel fa filth he I The wit pet, wheth Wary ? Ye Did any lated to eel able ?--[Hi which was Had yai lea two. Wert the ; —Yes. I beg to thin in th ieetY,coin )pereetve as Lord L jesty tee i firmest= you had ad ever a per That le time that Proristl What pi you joined Did be account of Was thl Did he Was Co ber 'Ma* Was in the At the 1 vice of be •one havin Was Be her servio Did a a aware of. Do yol Naples T-. Do you I 4.3 isot. Do you ter Royal Do you rine; bein You sai Princess, No, lasi Was tb sdr. BO The L admitted ites to Sid al ruin GC bat gar I Wag nem, vilki grating* induie m Laid 1 . et heal —1 cam ' tart - list met Safi ..~_ ~...~: