Star. — London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

The Arroastre-Ganzant to the witness.—Was it so usual for 1 the Princess to walk arm in arm with Bergami, that if she had done to at Syracuse it would have made no impression on you 1 mind?—lt wouldfot. The witness continue-1 recollect during the voyage to Greece an Order being conferred on Bergami. The Princess I had months before mentioned that she intended to confer some marks of distinction on those who should accompany her en her, pilgrimage, as a memento. The Order conferred on Bergami was tnat of St. Caroline. He was Grand Master of the Order. , The Order of St. Sepulchre—the Holy Sepulchre, was .also conferred on him. That Order, I believe, was not purchased for him. That Order was conferred on other persons. On Count Schiavini and William Austin. I think it is a Catholic order. The Princess and I were present when the order was conferred, it was in the Cathedral Church at Jerusalem. In travelling to Jerusalem, we reposed under tents during the day, and travelled by night. There were six or seven tents. Flynn, Schiavini, and the Doctor usually slept in the same tent with me. I have seen the Princess throw herself upon the sofa in the tent, on alighting from her mule or ass. I do not know where Bergami reposed during the day. Ido not know that he was in the same tent with the Princess. I never saw him there. Do you not believe he did?—He may or may not; Ido not know. What is your belief 2—l dire say he did, but I do not know. Do you not believe that he slept under the same tent 7-1 do not know. Did you ever see him under any other tent 7—No, I did not. I retired to my own tent as soon as I alighted from my horse. In the course of our journey to Greece, we were at Ephesus. On the day after our arrival there, the Princess dined in the Church-yard, or under the porch of the . Church, an old Monas tery. I am thoroughly convinced I dined with her Royal Highness on that occasion. I have no recollection of any per sons of low life being at the dances given at the Villa Barons. In the journey to Senegalia her Royal Highness had four car riages ; an English landau, an English landaulet, a small German calash belonging to William, and a Roman calash. Ido not re collect seeing Sacchi on that journey, nor Carlo Forte My memory is not marked with the fact of seeing either of them.. I think the Princess travelled in the landaulet, but I am not cer tain ; she almost always travelled in it. I rather think the Conn tees of Oldi and Bergami were in the carriage with the Princess. I was in the English landau, and with me 1 believe there were the two chambermaids and Captain Schiavini. The child Vic torine also travelled, I believe, in the carriage with her Royal Highness the whole way from Rome to Senegalia. lam in duced to believe so from a particular circumstance that occurred. On a previous occasion, when going to Aum, our carriage was upset when the child was in it, and she would never come into it again. The third carriage contained, I think, William Austin and Vassali. The ArtonNev-Gmitaar. now examined the witness as to the journey to Rome.—l think I saw Louis Bergami at Ancona, but lam nut certain. He came from Rome and met us at An cona. Ido rot recollect whether Camera and L. Bergami tra velled with us front Rome to Senegalia. While we were at Rome, Louis Bergami went several times to Milan; and I can't say whether he was with us at the time we went to Senegalia. Carlo Forte and Sacchi were, I think, the two couriers at the time we went on that journey, but I have no distinct recollection of seeing the one or the other on that particular part of our journey. I dan't recollect s...eing Sacchi riding besidethe Princess's carriage. I cannot swear to a thing I cannot recollect. I never saw Bee. gatni's wife. I know snore of Bergami's family besides Louis, one was called Rom-hi:ola, another Barnard. I know Fans tine, sister of Bergami. 1 heard the Countess Oldi was his sis ter soon after she came into the house, but I did not positively know it till some time after. I have seen Faustiaa's husband at Villa d'Este.Locis Bergami began to dine at the table of the Prin ctss, I believe, soon atter the great voyage. I never saw Fasts tina dine with her Royal Highness. I know other relations of his. Pietro, his nephew, and Carlin. Carlino was servant to her Royal Highness. Pietro was, as I imagine, in the stables. After our return from the long voyage, the mother of Bergami was not more often than before called Madame Livia. At Pe saro, she was in the habit of dining regularly with the Princess. Ilernardo, I think, did not dine with her Royal Highness at the Barone. I never saw Bergami's wife, the Baroness, at the table; neither did I see her at the Villa d'Este, Pesaro, or the Barona. The Barone is two miles from Milan. I have never seen his wife. I was with her Royal Highness three years, and never saw Bergami's wife come to see her child. When I first joined her Royal Highness at Genoa, I was sent for by her Royal Highness. I reside now in tiry-street, St. James's. I have been frequently with her Royal Highness at Branden. burgh House. I have not been there since Saturday. I have been but twice since I came last to England. I saw Schiavini there. I came to England last Friday week, I think. 1 have been twice in England. had been in England five weeks be fore I returacd to Rouen, where I remained ten days. I then came over again. I.e-erannned by Mr. TYNDALL. Faustina, I know, was in the house at Genoa, but I did not mean to say she was in the household. The upper servants only joined in the amusements at the Villa d'Este. The under ones did not. Tne plays at the'Villa d'Este took place about four years ago. I have no better recollection of the plot sr incidents of those entertainments than I stated. At Tunis, a Doctor was taken pn board. An alteration then was made; Bergami's bed was then placed in the dining-room, within a screen. I don't recollect Bergand going into the cabin with the Princess after tke acciAent. He could nor have slept in the cabin, for he must have &lei: on the ground, if he did. When you said that you believed Bergami slept in the tent, what was the ground of your belief ?—liecaase there was a squall, which obliged her Royal Highness to come down, and Bergami old me that the sea came in, and he therefore must have been tl.ere. 1)o you recollect Bergami's dress at the time?—No, I have no distinct recollection of his dress, but he was dressed at the time. 1)o you believe that Bergami slept every night under the tent? The SOLICITOR-GENERAL objected to this as a leading question. Mr. Baououau said the Attorney-General had put a similar one.—The question was not pressed. The crew of the polacca was composed of Neapolitans and Sicilians. Half the crew were upon deck during the night. Why did you think it necessary that the Princess should have somebody to sleep with her under the tent ?—I considered that the Princess sleeping on deck by herself would not be at all right. I had never seen any of those men before I sailed, and knew nothing of their characters. Her Royal highness has walked with me—with Schiavini, as well as with Bergami. She has walked with other Gentlemen who came to visit her. I was appointed Knight of the Order of St. Caroline, of which Bergami was Grand Master. Mr. Flynn, another, William Austin, Camera,and, I believe, Dr. Alochetti, were also appointed Knights of that Order. Witness, in continuation, statcd, that there was an English sailor on hoard the polacca, who went as far as Athens, and then left them ; witness had been ordered to attend the Admiralty, where he was asked when he had seen the sailor, James Adams, last, and it he knew where he was. Examined by the LORDS. The Earl of ROSEBERRY - .—Witness only once saw her Royal Highness at breakfast at Genoa. Bergami was there. —lie was not sitting, but appeared as though in waiting.— pot.s not recollect any other person being in the room at the time. You stated that you once went up the ladder into the tent. Did you do so more than once ?—Yes, more than 011 CC; when I went up the ladder and saw the tent was closed, I came down again immediately. Witness said, my only knowledge of the Princess being there was by seeing that the tent was closed. I cannot say how many persons might have slept under the tent, as 1 was never in it at night. Idu not know which of the couriers accompanied the Princess's carriage in the journey from Rome to Sencgaglia. I think one of them went before in a carriage. I think it was Sacchini, but I am not positive. E ar l GRHY.—In answer to a question from his Lordship, witness said he thought it necessary that some male attendant should sleep near her Roy al Highness, and it did not convey to his mind that there was any improper conduct on the part of the Princess. • The Earl of LIVERPOOL enquired where Lieutenant Flynn slept on the voyage?—f believe he slept in his cabin, and sometimes on deck during the voyage from Jaffa. I know he frequently slept on deck. I often saw his cot there. Did you not act as Private Secretary to her Royal highness? ••••Yeb, I did. Do you know anything of the purchase of the_ Villa Barona, by the Princess, and giving it to Bergami? PaNatats objected to the question. The Earl of LIVERPOOL only wished to know the fact, and not the particulars. The CORD CLIANCRLLOR said, the witetit might be asked if any perm pereiteeed the estate of Villa Banana, NUM.; of the monarchy ; especially when coupled with such' to a witness, the men was driven into such confusion, that he the witness knew in whose poteesSon it now was, s edidosp . placards and band-bills as form, at this. d -'.i a "4 ha" what he said. His Lordship thistighs this shjet- The Earl of LtvgapoOL to witness Does the Vilb Ma • nap:would be obviated If each question, as put to the witness eons beim% to Bergsma? moment, the subject of general conversations and was repeated by the short-band writer before being answered. ' Mr. Denten objected to the question. which, of course, could only be writted \by " COX' The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that after a question The Earl of LIVERPOOL—Does witness know whether the Barons is in possession of Raped ?—I do not know at re- filmed Radicals and 'twain!" So, at least, wehave . was put, and the answer given, the short-band writer should but more could certainly not be sent ; I believe it was; it bas been called dse Villa Berpmi. The Marquis of LANSDOWN.—Witness said the Countess been always taught to believe. Often, often, have AVM them to the Howe I of Oldi had a separate tent during the journey to Jerusalem; we heard of these 64 NVer4o•lol4tifiridentirrerthated anew"' chum- , . „ .= Lord LAUDERDALE thought that the mode suggested by but he did not know whether she slept in it, or with the bernsaids. Witness did not know that the Princess leaned on t ra i torous conspraton ; and, coming f rom so the Noble Earl would destroy completely the effect of the cross- Bergend's arm on board the palaces. She had often leaned on ultra-loyalists, we are bound to give it full credit ; examination; and even to the extent stated by the Noble Lord the anted witness. -- -- LerS 14.111,PERDALE objected to any questions _which unless, indeed, it could be proved that, in such a on the Woolsack, that effect was much impaired. assumed the Princess leaned on the arm of Raped on country as this, there has, for years, existed a loyal Rol GREY agreed that the effect of the cross - examinati xi deck as witisisi not stated it. was impair 14 16 1 DO` - - conspiracy to create Radical conspiracies. Butimpaired, but the House bad no alternative. If each que,- and - wete not repeated as put and made, the Lords /Jsiquis, dressed P' Marquii of L, IDOWN.—In answer to further quiestlons from the Noble •- witness said, he had frequently seen Lords Bergami v as Harlequin • but he never saw the parts of Harlequin and Columbine is It aly supported in the same manner as in England. Lord COMBERMERK—Do you know whetiter any third person slept in the tent of her Royal Highness ?—1 do not know, a third person might have slept there. Will you swear that you never saw Bergami kiss the Prin cess of Wales ?—I will swear that I never saw Bergami kiss the Princess. The Earl of LIMERICK then examined the witness, who said, that be conceived it necessary that some person should sleep near her Royal Highness as a guard. Persons might have slept in a hammock on deck, but the only persons proper to do so were the witness and Captain Flynn. Count Schiavini, unaccustomed to being on board ship, could not be expected to sleep there. The English sailor was not on board at the time. We might all have slept outside the tent as well at one. There was no order given to watch particularly ever hor Royal Highness. We had no suspicions of the crew, or of any person on board. Did you not think it improper 13ergatni's sleeping in the same tent with her Royal Ilighness?—No ; from all the circumstances I did not think it improper. The hatches were nottlosed, idl the doors were open below—there was no mystery iu it. . I would ask Lleutemint Hownam, as a married man, if he would have no objection to Mrs. Hownam sleeping in the same tent with a male person and the light put out?—! think that every person judges of his own wife without making compari son. I can only answer the question by saying that I make no such comparisons. Did you see no impropriety in a male and female so sleeping? —Considering all the circumstances I certainly did nut. I have seen her Royal Highness in such peculiar situations. What do you mean by these •peculiar situations ?—I have seen her Royal Highness, at Ephesus, sleep in a shed in which you would not put cows in this country, among horses, Turks, mules, &c. The Earl of LIMERICK was putting some questions as to the witness's opinions, to which Earl GREY objected. Matters of facts were proper to be elicited, but not a witness's opinions and observations. The Earl of LAUDERDALE argued, that if a witness were to be questioned as to his opinion on every subject, it would open the way to interminable examinations. The LORD CHANCELLOR suggested that the question should be struck out of the Minutes, which was done accordingly. The Earl of LIMERICK said he had no object but to elicit the truth, and if the Learned Counsel (Mr. Brougham) would suggest any questions to him, he should most willingiLeut them. laugh). Did you see the Princess of Wales and Louis Bergami dance together at any time ?—No ; I saw. Louis Bergami dressed as Harlequin; we all danced together; I was dressed as a Greek. Who was the Columbine when Louis Salami was dressed as Harlequin ?—I do not recollect; if I recollected to have seen her Royal Highness dressed as Columbine, I would have stated it. Do you recollect to have seen her Royal Highness perform the part of an Automaton in another tarce ?—Yes. Did not the performance consist in buying and selling an Au tomaton ?—Yes. What did the Automaton do, sit, walk, ride, or what ?—lier Royal Highness was standing in a box. Do you conceive that such an amusement was consonant to the high dignity of a royal personage ?—I could "not enter into her Royal Highness's mind, but I did not think her conduct derogatory, knowing the pleasure which she takes in that sort of entertainment. Adjourued at Four o'clock. ABSTRACT of the NET PRODUCE of the REVENUE of GREAT BRITAIN (exclusive of the Arrears of War Duty on Malt and Property) in the Years and Quarters, ended 10th October, 1818, 1819, 18e0. Customs ... .. ......... Stamps . Post Office Assessed Taxes Land Taxes... T0ta1...... Custom,' Excise !smpr.... , Post - Office Assessed Taxes Land Taxes TZARS XIIIIND. 1818. 1 1819. I 1940. .------.:.--,-.--.--,--„,, Z. 10,548,11 22,156,01 6,427,2' 1,339,01 6,173,8: 1,154,9' 6,211, , 1,416,1 JE. 8,746,104 26,488,508 6,115,482 1,446,000 6,279,547 1,207,630 560,538 1,199, 349,1 8,289,Z081 47 QUASTIOLS 1818. I 1819. I 1820. 50,643,810 3,669,754 5,866,804 1,672,165 360,000 787,426 181,801 49,150 L 753,167 5,674,687 1,575,437 375,000 781,448 198,177 • 77,628 2,670,683 7,552,021 1,581,204 375,000 760,576 174,529 71,642 Total 12,587,1001 11,435,544 13,185,048 CONSOLIDATED FUND. Quarter to the 10th Oct. 1819—Surplus - - - - £147,034 Present Quarter ' 1,308,386 Excess of Charge in the present Quarter, beyond 1 400,000 that of 1819, about THE EVENING STAR. LONDON. gm•lmliimr.4.lM. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1820. PRICK OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK 3 per Cent. Reduced 66i j i ex. div.-3 per Cent. Cons. 67i i 67 3e per Cent. 75j ex. div.-4 per Cent. 64f 64 ex. div. 5 per Cent. Navy 1051 i—Long Annuities 17 5-16 7-16 es-div. India Stock 2171—Bonds 245. 255. pre. Exch. Bills 4s. Si. pre.—Cons. for Acct. 67t 67. a thing is in itself so diabolical that, of course,none but rank and inveterate Jacobins could even imagine it I In sober seriousness we say, that the inhabitants of this vast Metropolis ought to thank Heaven that the Hand-bill conspiracy has failed ; for it was planned, we have no doubt, for the purpose of creating an oc casion to let loose the military upon the people.— Created by our Ministers ? Heaven forbid ! No, but by men who wished—no matter at what expense • of human misery and blood—to recommend them selves to our rulers, for zeal, diligence, and a wonder ful tact at scenting out traitors. And mark the infer nal object combined with this !—to implicate the QuEss in a pretended conspiracy against the Govern ment. Yes, to give so complete a turn to the balance of justice, as not only . to bolster up a scouted prose cution, now sinking beneath contempt, but to havl the QUEEN of ENGLAND branded with rebellion and treason !—Yes, such appears to have been the object of the frustrated excitement, which was to have stirred up the ignorant and unwary to attempt a practical exposition of gs an express .Act of Parlia ment, which makes it penal to question the right of the Nation to limit the succession to the Throne!"—Bat we must not dwell at present on this topic. There will, if we mistake not, be, ere long, no little noise about it, and the people, high or low, who have been connected with it. • The examination, cross-examination, and re-exa mination of Mr. HOWNAM occupied the whole of yesterday. - His belief, in opposition to Mr. FLYNN'S evidence, was, that BERGAMI slept under the tent on deck, in the voyage from Palestine to Italy; and we rather think this must be the fact, for the Counsel for the Quzaw stated thil fact, on the opening of the case, and assigned a sufficient reason for it.— But the idea of undressing, as is usual when people on shore go to bed, must not be joined with the cir cumstances ; for the voyagers were more in the cir cumstances of passengers by a stage-coach, who sleep how they can in the vehicle, than of chow who re gularly stop to refresh themselves with a night's rest. There were not even bed-clothes in the tent ; and her 31.4.sxsrr slept, and must of necessity hare slept in full attire, and so must BERGAMI; and let it also be recollected, that the passage from the dining room to the tent, was open during the whole voyage, and the Officer on deck' was in the habit of conversing with her _MAJESTY at all hours of the night, and of drawing aside the canvass opening of the tent, when the noise of the rigging prevented him from hearing her . MAJESTY. " There was a necessity for having a tent on deck, on account of the heat and the noise and smell of the animals, below." " BERGAMI S bed below was screened off." This refutes the statement of the Queen's bed being visible from it. Mahomet's dance was the common dance of the East—and chiefly performed in derision of the Doctor, and to prove that he stood in no need of physic ! BERGAMI'S dress with pillows, was in derision of a pompous Consul. The QUEEN did not dine only with BERGAMI in the porch of the ruinei mosque, near Ephesus, but with her whole suite ; and was everywhere received with great distinction except at Vienna, where Lord Srawater was Ambat; sador, and where, of course, neglect or insult might ' have been least expected ! Let it be recollected, that in the examination and cross-examination of Englikh witnesses, the questions are put in rapid succession, are of all kinds, the one, often having no relation whatever to those immedi ately before, and the witness kept standing, sometimes for six hours—as was the case yesterday. How few could stand this ? . The examination of the witnesses for the prosecution was, on the contrary, conducted slowly through the medium of an Interpreter ; and while the Interpreter was translating the question a witness had time to collect himself. But the English witnesses have no such repose : question follows question with a rapidity which, when continued for a .great length of time, is sufficient to bewilder and stupify any mind. We have been informed, that before the examina tion of Lieutenant FLYNN, a Message had been pre pared to be sent from the KING to the Peers, to stop farther proceedings; but his examination seems, strangely, to have given fresh confidence to the pro secutors. The business goes on this day as usual, but we should not be surprised were Mr. HowsAM's evi dence (who is again on examination this day) to cause the delayed Message to make its appearance. THE NINTH DAY OF TIM DEFENCE. HOUSE OF LORDS. The House met this morning, at ten o'clock. Prayers were read by the B:shop of &uric. On the roll being called over, the absentees were more numerous than on most preceding day!. MODE OF CROSS-EXAMINATION. The Earl of BLESSINGTON rose, and, u well as we could hear, observed, that in a Morning Paper which he held in his hand (we believe the Times), It was remarked that, in conse quence of the hurried rapidity with which, questions were put THE QUEEN. lion answer in his part of she House would not hear one answer out of ten. Lieutenant HOWNAM was now recalled, and appeared at the Bar. Statstinsd by their Lordships. By Lord WALSINGHA3L—Do you know where her Royal Highness took the bath on board the polacca ; in what cabin, or where?-1 never saw her Royal Highness take the bath on board, and consequently cannot tell. By the Earl of CARNARVON.—You have said you were once with her Royal Highness at Trieste. Can you state of your own knowledge whether, after you joined her Royal Highness in Italy, she was ever at Trieste, except on the occasion you have referred to ?—I can. She never was there except on that occasion. By Lord KINGSTON.—Were you In the Princess's service before Bergand 7—No. Do you know the reason why Bergami was selected to guard her Royal Highness, in preference to yourself or Lieutenalit Flynn 7—l cannot well speak to that. Is it customary for a sentinel to sleep on his watch 7—lt is certainly not customary fbr a sentinel to sleep on his watch. What ships have you served In ?—Many. Be so good as name them and the Captains 7—The Africaine, Captain Manby ; the Lively, Captain Hammond ; the Centaur, Sir Samuel Hood ; the Barfleur, Captain M'Leod ; the Lavinia, Lord Wm. Stewart; the Redstance, Captain Adams and Cap. fain Rozenhagen; the Andromeda, Captain Palm ; and the Undaunted, Captain Usher. How many years have you been in the service?—Since the early part of 1803. By Lord DARNLEY.—You have said diet there was no mystery or concealment whatever when her Royal Highness slept in the tent on deck. Did you observe whether, on other occasions, when Bergami may have slept near her Royal High new, during that journey, there was any mystery or conceal ment 7 None whatever. What was your opinion or Bergami as a servant other Royal Highness 2—l must confess that he was exceedingly attentive, and most ready in his duty. - Was he a man who was more likely than any other to be selected, on account of his fidelity and attachment, to guard her Royal Ilighness?—l should think that the way in which I have seen hisn'treated bythe Marquis Giuzilieghri, and other persons, was likely to operate to that effect. Yon had no suspicion in your own mind ibom the eircum-. stance of his being so selected 2—None. You were asked yesterday a question respecting Mrs. How nem, supposing her to be in a ntuadon similar to that of the Princess, sleeping with a male person, under the same tent, which question you declined to answer. Pray how old is Mrs. Ilownam ?- (Earessions of disapprobation front massy e their lordships)—She is about thirty years of age. • Are you living together as man and wife ought to do ?— Strong tokens of disapproval). The LORD CHANCELLOR said that the question was quite inachnissible.--It was ordered to be struck out. Lord DARNLEY.—Ax you acquainted with lieutenant Flynn n—l am. Do you believe him to be a man of honour and veracity? The LORD CHANCELLOR.—The only question which, can be put to this effect must be—ls lieutenant Flynn a man, to be believed un his oath? Lord DARNLEY.—Do you think lieutenant Flynn is a man who is to be believed on his oath believe Lieutenant Flynn to be a t erfect man of honour. From the knowledge you have of Lieutenant Flynn, do yen . believe thatbis understanding is always perfectly clear and cor rect 7—l cannot presume to pass an opinion on the understand - ing of a man of my own age. The question and answer were ordered to be struck out. By Lord DE DUNSTANVILLE.—What distance was the steerage from the tent?—From the helm? About five feet. You have said, that OR the voyage from Jaffa, lieutenant Flynn slept sometimes on deck ; I ask you, whether, when Mr. Flynn slept there, was not her Royal Highness sulidently pro tected 7—He did not sleep constantly on deck. But when he did sleep on deck, do you think her Royal Highness was then sufficiently protected?—Yes, sufficiently protected. If Lieutenant Flynn bad slept on deck during the whole of the voyage from Jaffa to Syracuse, was it necessary for any other person to sleep in the tent near her Royal Highness ? There might * many reasons, the ship rolling, an accident in the tent, a sea breaking over it, or twenty things. The LORD CHANCELLOR complained that the wham* was inaudible, and wished him to raise his voice so as to be heard by every Peer in the House, if possible. Examination resumed. Am I to consider the answer you have last given as the answer • to my question 7—Yes. You have said that on the voyage from Jaffa, you sometimes went up the ladder at night, and finding that the Princess had retired, you tame down immediately. How can you reconcile this with thinking that there was nothing improper in Ber gamts sleeping all night in the tent 7—Because the tent was closed all round ; but the hatchway and doors were open. You stated that there was no light in the dining-room 7—l think there was not. What occasioned your going through the dining-room to the tent P—From the habit of going there all day ; I did not know that the tent was closed. It was not absolutely in the night. It was about ten o'clock, I think. Wh.t period of the year was this 7—We left Jaffa, T think, on the 17th July, and arrived at Syracuse on the 40tb August. Do you mean to say, that at that period of the year it was not dark at ten o'clock ?—lt was night-time ; it was dark—as dark as it is at such an hour in our own climate. When you went up the ladder, you did not know that the tent was closed ?--I did not. Earl GROSVENOII.—Have you any reason to believe, from the violent attack that was nude enter Royal Highness's home at Genoa, or from any other circumstances, that her Royni Highness had any particular apprehensions es to her personal safety 7---She had, because she mentioned it to me. Did she in consequence of such apprehensions express to you a wish to be more closely attended by the male part of her at tendants ?—Yes ; I have heard her frequeetly mention this affair ' and say, that she would in future have some person to he constantly near her. I cannot recollect her exact words, bog this was the substance of them. Was it in consequence of these apprehensions P—Yes, in eon seence of these apprehensions. • Lord COMBERMER F.—You have stated. that in conse quence of the lolling vf the ship, as well as for the protection of her Royal Highness, that some one should sleep in the .tent would this have been better done by Lieutenant Flynn or your self than a landsman, particularly as to the rolling of the ship? .—Were that the only cause, I certainly think a seaman most proper. Would not a seaman have rendered her Royal Highness 84E cleat service 7—l believe he would. The Marquis of DOWNSHIRK—You stated, that you had Our Readers will find, in our fourth page, as ample a detail as our limits allow, of the various Processions of yesterday to Brandenburgh House, to present Ad dresses to the QUEEN. We are happy to say that, notwithstanding the immense crowds, we have not heard of a single accident ; nor ought we, perhaps, to omit congratulating the country generally, but especially the relatives of the many thousands of un armed and defenceless men, women, and children, who assembled on this occasion, " marching," too, " in military array, with inscribed banners, and music and staves"—(" bludgeons," as thick as a man's finger) —that no stipendiary Magistracy interfered, and let loose upon them corps of drunken Yeomanry Ca valry, to flesh their new-ground sabres. In a certain place, not a hundred miles from Manchester, such perilous doings as we witnessed yesterday, would be held as seditious assemblages, endangering the ?eaee of the country, and threatening the subversion - L. •, ~., T bees the gate T servo fore Ikon the y mine who shoo want dolt - 11 den Not to th stain wbic eras be a add Hit Mg I. - -. w 4 don 1 rig 'I bei 1 adb Tim the the bell WI hl Of