Star. — London, England, 1829-07-04 00:00:00

Itlifourt t K l .;, 4 \:4 ~~ Z ;LLIGENCE: 'HANCERY, hay S. 41103Z/4i/4yr PARRATT. Mr. Tititst.ove ap lied to the Lord Chancellor for the discharge of the deiendant Russell, who had been com mitted to the net tfor a contempt, in having contracted a marriage with a ward of the Court without the con sent of her guardians or the Court. The petition stated, that the Master had reported the marriage to be valid, and that the sett!emerrts prepared by him bad been duly executed. The discharge of the prisoner was ordered. JACKSON V. HANKEY. This petitio•t was then called on. It was an appeal from a decision of the Master of the Rolls when Vice Chancellor, by which he had dismissed the bill filed in this cause. It appeared that a settlement had been made out on the matria;;e of Mr. Saville, by which a sum of Bank Stock had been settled on the husband and wife for their j pint lives, and on the death of the wife the dividends and principal were to go to the children of the marriage. Mr. Saville, who was a man of considerahle wealth, had continued to receive the dividends after the death of his wife, and after his children came of age. In the course of his life, certain family arrangements had been made, in which his right to do so was not disputed, and the general result of those arrangements had been much more advantageous to the children than the receipt of the dividends to which they were entitled. Alter his death a bill had been flied against the trustees of the settle ment, for an account of the dividends which they had permitted the husband to receive. Their defence to this was, that the persons entitled had sanctioned such receipt by concurring in the arrangements made by the late Sir. Saville, and that after such concurrence they could not maintain their present demand. Besides this, the trustees filed a cross bill, in which they claimed to be reimbursed, if the Court should decree them to be responsible for such dividends, out of the estate of Mr. Saville. When the cause came on to be heard before the then Vice Chancellor, he expressed an opinion, that under the circumstances the demand was an ungracious one, and that the parties ought to be precluded from raising it after what had taken place, and he ultimately -dismissed the bill. Counsel were heard on both sides, and The LORD CHANCELLOR postponed his judgment. ROLLS COURT, JULY 3. IN RE sHEPPARD'S CHARITY. This is a charity for the maintenance and clothing of a certain number of aged men and women, and the payment of the salary of a Nonconformist Minister is also provided for under the same trust. The funds arise from landed property, and the sum of 8001. having been obtained from the sale of timber belonging to the estate, the trustees thought proper to purchase a landed estate for upwards of 9001. A petition was now presented, praying that an order might be made for the payment of the purchase money out of the funds arising from the sale of timber and other sources. The MASTER of the ROLLS said the Court had no authority to do what was required. It was urged that the very charity estates in question had been purchased in the same manner as was now proposed, under the authority of the Court of Chancery. His HONOUR replied, lie was sorry for it; the Court of Chancery had no power to do so. In the present case, the petition must stand over. LAUDERDALE AND TWEEDALE. This was a petition to confirm the M4ster's report, and order tl.e payment of a sum of upwards cf 2,0001. in South Sea Annuities to the petitioner. A larger sum (about 8,000/.) than that now in question was originally directed to be laiJ out in landed property, under a settlement, for the benefit of the children of the Lauder dale family. No settlement was made, and the money was not Lid out in land, but in various securities. The younger children had all been paid the sums due to them, and an order was made by a former Master of the Rolls to ascertain how far the present Earl of Lau derdale was entitled to the residue of the property. An inquiry was accordingly made before a Master, who found that the Earl was entitled to the residue as tenant in tail. The present application was to confirm that report —The order was granted. COCKLE V. WHITING. The plaintiff was second mate in a ship engaged in the South Sea whale fishery, the defendant was the owner and consignee ; the present proceeding originated in a dispute relative to the distribution of the produce of the cargo. It appeared that the defendant was en titled to one fourth of the adventure, the remainder being divided in certain proportions among the crew, kc. The plaintiff, as second mate, was to receive one six- tieth share for his services; in 1820 the ship sailed, and she returned in 1823 ; previous to het arrival the defen dant disposed of his I.4th of the cargo at the rate of 521. per tun ; when the vessel came into port, the crew called for a settlement ; an estimate was made of the quantity of the cargo in the usual manner ; it was taken at 260 tuns and the men (the plaintiff among the rest) received their proper shares of the computed produce at 421. a tun, which was then the market price, oil having fallen in value subsequent to the period when the defendant sold his fourth. It was in evidence that the sale of the defendant's share was en his own account, and exclu sively for his own benefit; and further, that notwith standing 421. a tun had been allowed the crew for the entire of their proportion, a part of it was disposed of at 411. 10s. However, it appeared that the actual quantity of oil was more than the estimated quantity by six or seven tuns, and the plaintiff, who had given a receipt for 1401. as his share of the adventure, filed the present hill to compel the defendant to allow him his proportion of the seven tuns extra, and of the surplus 101. a tun obtained by the defendant on his own one ft.urth share of the oil at the first made sale. The MASTER of the ROLLS in giving judgment ob served, that he saw no reason for complying with that part of the plaintiff's demand which related to the dif ference beta een 421. a tun ahich had been allowed to the crew on their shares, and 521. the price obtained per tun by t► , e defendant for his proportion of the cargo. The plaintiff mistook if he supposed himself entitled to a share of the cargo; he could only claim his share of the produce; and. w itlr regard to the owner's fourth of the oil, it had evidently been sold, as appeared from the broker's note of sale, on his own account exclusively. and as _a matter of speculation in which the crew had no right to participate. With respect to the other point—the surplus quantity of oil—it was equally clear. It appeared that it was customary for the cooper of the ship to make an estimate (before the oil was sold) of the probable quantity of the cargo, and that it was usual to settle with the crew, going upon that estimate. Here the estimated quantity was 260 tuns, and finally it turned out that it amounted to seven tuns mote—it might have turned out to be seven tuns less, for in mak ing thee calculations, it seemed that a good deal de pended, as far as regarded minute accuracy with re spect to the precise quantity of oil, more or less, spoil the state of the atmosphere. One thing was evident, that the crew (and among them the plaintiff) had agreed to accept the estimate, made in the usual manner of dealing in the trade, as the measure of their respec tive shares, and it was now too late fir any of them to complain. The bill must therefore be dismissed, and with costs. _ _ COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Witsrunisszs, Jon' 5. Sittings in Banco. The Court was engaged the greater part of the morn. ing on cases from the special paper, in which Mr. Justice James Parke had been engaged as Counsel ; and that Learned Judge held the nisi prius sittings for Lord Ten terden at Guildhall, it being arranged that the special cases should be argued in his absence. EX PARTS DAVIS. Mr. CAMPBELL moved for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against a Magistrate of the county of Cat marthen. The case, the Learned Counsel observed, was one of consider able imp stance, as the offence charged against the Magistrate was a most serious one, but he (Mr. Camp bell) sincerely hoped that he would be able to purge himself: He made the motion on the affidavit of a person of the name of Davis, who stated, that on the evening of the 13th ut May last he was returning home from Carmarthen, when he was stopped on the high. way by a person who attacked him with a club, knocked him down, and robbed him ; he identified the man,whose name was David Williams.and then went be fore a Magisti ate named Mitchell (not the party against whom the present application was made, and whose name, with the permission of the Court, he would not at present mention) and obtained a warrant for the ap prehension of Williams. The warrant was placed in the hands of the constable; but before it could be exe cuted,Williams absconded. A short time afterwards Davis, to his great surprise, was taken upon a warrant issued by the tientleman against whom he (Mr. Camp bell) now applied, and who, without naming him, he would call the defendant. for an assault upon Whams, the man who had robbed him. He was taken before the defendant ; but Williams did not appear. The defen dant then advised Davis to make the matter up with Wi lliams, who he said would return him his money, and pay all expenses. Davis, however, refused to compromise the matter: The defendant then told him that he should comok him to take his trial for the assault at the Quarter Sessions. Davis, in order to avoid being com mitted, was obliged to find sureties for his appearance' to take his trial. He now stated his belief that the charge against him, and the threatened commitment, were devised between the defendant and Williams, as a trick to induce him to drop the prosecution against Williams fur the assault and robbery. Subsequently. Williams procured another warrant against Davis, requiring him to appear before the Magistrate (not the defendant) on the 25th of May. Davis accor dingly attended. The Magistrate whose signature was attached to the warrant was not present, but the defendant was, and he again endeavoured to induce Davis to forego the prosecution againstWill.ams, but Davis persisted in his refusal, and the defendant then called Williams into another room with him. On his return, he said to the constable, si I have bound Williams over to appear at the Quarter Sessions, and you must therefore not touch him." Now this was a serious charge against the defendant; he was accused of conniving with a person against whom a charge of highway robbery had been preferred. Davis was cor roborated in what he had sworn as to what took place on both occasions, by the constable and another person. Lord TENTERDILNYOU may take a rule to show cause; probably we shall have an answer. Rule Nisi granted. MARSH AND ANOTHER •. WOOD AND ANOTURR. This case CAIRO before the Court upon demurrer. The action was brought by the assignees of Mr. Joshua Rowe against Mr. Alderman Wood and his partner. for a breach of covenant in revoking a submission to re ference made between the defendants and Mr. Rowe, before the banktuptcy of the latter. It appeared that them had been differences between the parties tespecting the right of Mr. Rowe to charge the defendants with a loss which had accrued to him in consequence of his purchase of three ships of war, and also as to other matters. The parties having agreed to a reference, certain proceedings thereon took place before the arbi trator, but before the reference was concluded, Mr. Rowe became a bankrupt, and his interest in the matters in dispute was assigned to the plaintiffs, who were the assignee. under the commission. The defendants then revoked their submission to arbitration, and the ques tion now was, whether or not that revocation was legal ? The case was argued by Mr. Follett in support of the demurrer, and by Mr. Richards against it. The COURT observed, that they were not in this case called upon to say whether the bankruptcy of a party had the effect t f revoking his submission to reference, because here it appeared that the matters in which the bankrupt originally claimed an interest, had, after the submission to arbitration, passed to his assignees. It was perfectly clear that those assignees would not have been bound by any award that the arbitrator might have made, and therefore the question was, whether the defendants remained liable under their covenant to abide by the award? The Court wets of opinion that they did not, and that therefore the action was not maintainable.—Judgment for the defendants. IN RR WATSON, EXECUTORS, AND ANOTHER. The question in this case, which was between the executors of an attorney of the name of Watson, Mr. Harper, his surviving partner, and a person who had been articled to Mr. Watson as his clerk, wa., whether a premium of 2001. paid by the clerk on his entering into the articles should be returned by the executors of Mr. Watson, or by the surviving partner, Mr. Harper? It appeared that Mr.Watsnn had died about two months after the clerk had been articled. The premium had been paid to Mr. Harper, and by him carried to the general account of the partnership, but it was con tended that, inasmuch as Mr. Watson had considerably overdrawn from the partnership account, Mr. Harper was not, as surviving partner, bound to restore the premium. The COURT, however, held that, under the circum stances, he was liable, and ordered accordingly. COURT OF COMMON PbEAS, JULY 3. SYMONDS V. HODSON. This case came before the Court upon a demurrer to the pleadings. It was an action on a policy of in surance on a ship called the Clarence, of Bristol. The vessel, on her voyage from St. Petersburgh to London, struck on some rocks off the coast of Sweden, and put into Elsinore to repair. To enable him to pay fir the repairs, the Captain borrowed money of the plaintiff, secured by bond on the bottom of the ship, but to be paid within eight days alter his (the Captain's) arrival in England, whether the vessel arrived or not. The plaintiff insured his interest in the vessel with the de fendant; and the ship was afterwards lost at sea. It was contended, on the part of the defendant, that be was not liable, because the policy of insurance described the plaintiff's interest as founded on bottomry bond, whereas it was an interest depending on the arrival of the Captain in England. The COURT was of opinion that that was no bottomry Saturday a very unpleasant accident happened to Lord MAUL His horse fell, and rolled over his Lordship, whose knee was considerably lacerated by the tongue of the buckle of the stirrup•leather. His Lordship sustained no other injury. He will necessarily, however, be confined to his room for a few days. Tuesday a Coronet's Inquest was held within the walls of the King's Bench Prison, before Para* Li PIPRIL Esq. Coroner, touching the death of Miss Anna Matta Rose Ross, aged 35 years, late a prisoner. Mrs. Ch.+ lotte Harris, of York•street, Br yanstone.square, de posed—The deceased was my sister, and had suffered considerably in her health for the last three years, in consequence of having received a fall from a horse, which fractured a piece of bone under the brain, that had latterly given way. Both at the time of the acci dent and subsequently, I importuned the deceased to have surgical ard, but she would never consent to undergo any operation, having an insuperable anti. parity to being attended by any medical adviser.— This obstinacy, I have not the slightest doubt, acce• lerated her dissolution. She had been declining in health for the last eighteen months, but had only been imprisoned about seven weeks. She was of a very eccen ti is and remarkably obstinate disposition, and from the time she entered this place would never suffer the regular surgeon to attend her, or any male person to eater her apartment. The deceased had a nurse t o attend her daily, and laboured under no other complaint than that already mentioned. She had some few years ago possessed considerable property, but lost it all through the conduct of her agent, why► embarked the entire of the proceeds in various unsuccessful speculations during the bubble mania. Coroner—Did the loss of her property affect or disorder her mind ? Witness—No, Sir ; she preserved her cheerfulness to the last moment of her existence. Maria Amelia Cox, nurse to the Prison In firmary,deposed—When the deceased entered this place she was ill with a severe affection of the brain, caused, as she told me, by a fall from a horse. I often en deavoured to persuade her to have medical advice, but without success. She died about half past 10 on Monday night. The Coroner briefly addressed the Jury, who, in a few minutes, unanimously returned a verdict of— di Died by the visitation of GOD." bond which did not put in jeopardy the whole principal and interest of the party, as depending on the safety of the ship. Here the plaintiff's interest depended on the arrival of the Captain in England ; and as the bond, therefore, was not a bottomry bond in point of law, the present action was not sustainable.—Demurrer allowed. THE BLACKHEATH MURDER. 1 1 The wound inflicted by Lambourn in his throat is of a very dangerous nature—yet his medical attend ants are str,•ngly of opinion he would survive, if it were not for the agitation of mind produced by the recent horrible event, which has placed him in this truly awful situation in which he now appears. He was restless the whole of Thursday night. and several of the other patients in the same ward were kept awake by the groans of the wretched victim to his passions. Yesterday morning he had little intervals of unretreshing sleep, and, on the whole, he appeared to be gradually getting worse —nor, however, from the increased danger of the wound, for the symptonis of inflammation still keep off. but, as already described, owing to the torture of mind tinder which there is every reason to imagine he must labour, although he retrains from complaint. As he finds his strength declining, he has bitterly expressed his firm belief that he will not survive many days, but now prays that he may yet be spared a little longer, to live and reuect of that crime which has plunged him into his present miserable condition. Since his admis sion into the Hospital, no relative or friend has been there to make any inquiry atter him ; and this citcum stance of neglect appears to add considerably to his already afflicted state of mind. It would seem that Lanibourn was not a hard chinking man, as had been insinuated; otherwise it is very improbable that his con• stitution would have borne up so long against the wound in his throat. If he had previously injured his frame by the immoderate use cf strong liquors, it is more than probable he would have been carded off before this by inflammation. Altogether, he is now a miserable spectacle of human misery; and, notwith standing the dreadful nature of the crime he has per.' petrated, his present condition excites the commiseration of all who behold him. CERTIFICATES-Jar 24. It. R. Stoddard, Zhelsea,ironmoager—G. Brown, 'Monmouth, innkeeper—W. Williams, Lombard-street, merchant—R. Burton, Little Bolton ' Lancashire, cotton-manufacturer—E. it. Buchanan, Stowmarket, Suffolk, maltster—R. klantborp, Southwold, Suffolk, timber merchant—W. Shaw, Leicester, hum dealer—A Cosser, Bridge-road, Lambeth, carpenter—S. Warner, Crayford, Kent, farmer—J. Aitchison, Abchurch-lane, bill broker—E. Astbury. Stone, Staffordshire, scrivener—E. F. Jacques, Gravesend, Kent, market gardener. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. J. and J. Middleton, Sheffield, whitesmiths—W. E. Hurst and J. Shaw, Manchester, cotton merchants—W. Jenkins and C. Bache, Birmingham, iron nterchantt—W. and J. Lambley, Bir mingliam, varnish maken—T. and S. Greathead, Holntfitth, York shire, linendrapers—L. Leveson and G. Jones, Chester, surgeon dentists—S. Abbott and G. Harvey, Snenton Nottinghamshire, maltsters—W. Skinner and G. Apsey, Hound:ditch, slopseUers-- J. Hill and J. Perry. Nottingham, machine makers—T. Hickman and W. Hunt, High Holborn, tea dealers—R. Slade and Co. Doctors Commons, proctors—T. Brockelsby and H. Morrison, Gosbenon, Lincolnshire, surgeons—J. Sweeting and J. Austin, Maddox street. Hanover square, drapers —J. Birley and Co. Manchester, cotton spinners—D. Hudson and J. Rushton, Gun street, Little Pearl -street, Spitallields, machine manufacturers— J. Whitehead and J. Monk, Manchester, attornies—C. Banns and N. Siddon, Old Bailey, tobacconists—W. Charleton and J. A. Dixon, London, timber merchants—J. Harvey and R. Oatway, Ford Mills, Newport, Isle of Wight, millers—J. and E. Treacher, Paternoster-row, tallow melters—d. Hudson and Co. Liverpool , carriers—J. Cowell and E. Day, Birmingham. surgeons—J. and 8. Willis, Ashted, Warwickshire, maltsters—P. Duncan and Co. London ( aI far as regards J. Rivers)—J. F. Reynolds and Co. Change-alley, Cornhill, stock brokers (as far as regards J. F. Lloyd)—W. Podmore and Co. Chester, upholsterers—J. Ashby and H. Pounsett, Bartholomewlane stock-brokers—S. Mitchell land Co. Norwich, Manchester wareh ousemen—J. J. Ewer and J. Johanning, Bow Church-yard, importers of foreign music—G. Bramwell and G. Beldon, Newcutle-upon-Tyne, manufacturers of cudbesr—J. and C. Ward, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, common carriers—J. Tittinsor and It. Crewe, Stafford, plumbers—L. and C. Rees. Swansea, haberdashers—C. Blakeley and Co. Unswortb, Lancashire, shopkeepers—H. Wheeler, jun. and T. Nixon, jun. Liverpool, tea dealers—W. Miller and G. H. Hoffman, Margate, surgeons—H. Ilkley and Co. Whitehaven—J. Carter and T. Parkinson, Richmond, Yorkshire, innkeeper—G. Webb and Co. Leicester, dealers in lime—lt. an/ T. Farmer, Woolverhampton, Staffordshire. factors— W. Wright and J. Eardley, Liverpool, merchants—T. T. Taylor and T. Ramsdell, Halifax, Yorkshire, unaUware manufacturers --.11. Tatham and G. Bailie, High-street, Poplar, surgeons. GENERAL AVERAGE PRICE OF BRITISH CORN, (wuicu 00,111111$ IMPOSTATION), For the Week ended Jugs 46, made up from the Returns of the Insptetors in the different Cities and Towns in England and Wales Imperial General Weekly Average. Wheat 691. vd. Oats 245. 3d. Beans 58s. 6d. I Barley 525. Od. Rye 525 . 01 I Peas 11s. 7d. . _ Aggregate Average of the Six Weeks which governs Duty. Wheat 701. &L Oats 455. 74. 1 Beans 571. 14. Barley Ils. 54. 1 Rye 341. Oti. I Peas 565. 14. PRICE OF SUGAR. The Avenge Price of BLOWS or Iduscovanis Sows, competed (rem the Returns made in the Week ending the 30th day of June 3809, is 995. Sid. per cwt. exclusive of the Dudes of Customs paid or payable thereon on the importation theteof into Great Britain. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET. Yesterday Rickard Breent, who stands charged with attempting to murder Mary Allison and Bridget Hogan, in Cain's-place, Ken. tub Town, was brought up for re-examination. The constable who took the prisoner into custody produced MP medical certificates. The one stated that Mary Allison was in a dangerous state from an injury on the bead, which bad caused a severe concussion of the brain. The other stated that Bridget Hogan was out of danger. Mr. Mnisuus.t. asked where the witness was who was to have appeared on the first examination of the prisoner? The constable replied that the witness, supposing the prisoner would have been examined at Hatton Garden Police Office on the /. former day, went thither, and waited for a long time, and after wards returned home. Mr. Mzusumt.—You ought to have gone to Hatton Garden Office and have brought him here. Constable—l was not aware at that time that he was waiting at another Office. Mr. Mussinutx.—You must bring that witness forward at the nest examination. Constable—l have been in search of him, but be has absconded. Dlr. Miesum—Abscouded! pray, how is that? Constable.-:•Why, Sir, it is a singular fact that the man, who lived at Holloway, after leaving Hatton Garden Office, went home and inflicted such severe injury on one of his sons, that his life is despaired of, and he has escaped. Mr. MINSHULL—He must be sought after. _ __ __ . Constable—l find that the prisoner did not break the poker over the head of the female ; he struck it against a wall and broke oft the knob. Mr. Minstrou.--Did you see it done Constable—No, Sir, I did not; but I was told so. Mr. Minsuoit.—Say only what you know yourself. Constable—The two women, Allison and Hogan, are drunken women, of bad character, and the prisoner is a sober industrious man, who has worked for one master twenty years, and be was very much provoked by Mrs. Allison calling him a cuckold. Mr. Idursuut.t.—That was no justification of his deadly Malik. Prisoner—My wife was once in trouble in Newgate. Prisoner's wife, who stood below the bar, exclaimed, " Say no. thing about it." Prisoner—l will; I was driven to madness by them; they came repeatedly and ridiculed my misfortunes and wrongs, and in my fury I did the act I acs charged with. Mr. Minsuusi.—Prisoner, I advise you to say no more on the subject; you will be remanded till Mrs. Allison's fate is known. Prisoner—Do you name any specific time? Mr. Pdursuou.—No •' but you wiU be brought up as soon as the parties are able to attend. MARLBOROUGH•STREET. Ms Williams, alias John Smith. was yesterday brought before the Sitting Magistrate, by Cheval, an officer of the Mendicity Society, charged with having several times obtained money under false pre tences—He was committed to prison for three months. MA R Y-LA. BON NE. Information was given to Mr, Gummi, the Sitting Magistrate, on Thursday night, that an extensive robbery had been committed in the afternoon, at the Lord High Admiral public house, in Church-street,Lisson-grove. under the following circumstances: While Mr. Baddin, the landlord, was engaged for a very short time in the cellar, a cash box in his bed room was robbed of 1591. in gold and silver, a 51. Bank of England note, and a cheque upon Sir Claude Scott and Co. for 61. Four young men, of genteel ap pearance, had frequented the house for a few days. Two of them were smoking sews in the club room just before the robbery was committed, and the club room is on the first floor, as well as the chamber. One of them came down, and engaged the maid at die bar in serving him with a glass of brandy at the time, and imme diately afterwards both of them came together to the bar, took a glass of brandy each, and left the house sbreptly, without paying for it, until the bar-maid called them back for that purpose.— A skeleton key was found in the bedreont door; the chest which contained the cash-box had been forced with a small crow-bar, technically called a " Jemmy," by thieves, which was left behind, and the cash-boz was broken. THAMES POLICE. A man named Page, a Tower waterman, was charged by a Gen tleman with the following assault ; The complainant hired the defendant's boat to convey him on board the Pearl steamer, which was about to proceed to Gravesend. The defendant, when be had got him out in the stream, refused to put him on board the Pearl, bat offered to take him to the Eclipse. The complainant then re. fused to pay him his fare, and the defendant conveyed him back to shore, collated him, and assisted by some of the vagabonds of the Tower stairs, det ained him for half an hour, during which time he was abused in a most shameful manner. The Magistrate fined him 206. Simon Agonise, an Italian, was convicted in the penalty of 1001. for having smuggled tobacco and spirits in his possession. This i$ the second time within six months the defendant had been con victed in a like penalty fur a similar offence. l t BIRTHS. On the 2d inst. at Chelsea:Mrs.KMurgatroyd, of a daughter On the Ist inst. in Gloucester-place, the Lady of .1. B. Bouvet Esq. of Abbot's Riptoa, of a son. On the 30th ult. at Brussels, Mrs. G. Pratt, of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 2d inst. at St. Pancras new church, Augustus Leicester Barwell, Esq. t• Ellen Sarah West, third daughter of Professor Coleman, of the Royal Veterinary College. On the 2d inst. at St. George's church, Hanover-square, William Garrett, Esq. of Bath, to Mrs. Burnett, of Rock-heuse, Brighton. DIED. On the td inst. at Mortgrave, Hertfordshire, Mr. Thomas Un derwood, of Fleet -street, aged 4s. The 2sth ult. at his house, Cunningham-place, Paddington, R. A. Druce, Esq. in his 77th year, late in the service of the East India Company. The 30th ult. at Rushton-house, Egham, aged 30, the Reverend R. Hopten Smith, second son of the late Rev. C. Smith, Rector of South Repps, Norfolk. Friday, the 26th June, at the Parade, Edmonton, Mrs. Hore. relict of the late James Hore, Esq. of Red Lion-square, in the 71st year of her age. Lately, in Gtosvenor-place, the infant son of the Hon. Mrs. and Gilbert Heathcote, Esq. M.P. NEWOATE AND LEADENHALL MARKETS, JULY 3. .. ...3s 4d to 31 8d I Veal ... 44 Od to 4s 8d Mutton .. ...Ss 4d to 35 8d Pork 3s 8d to 41 84 Lamb 5s ( , 51 to 5s 44 PRICES or HAY AND STRAW YESTERDAY. ST. 7 •Si ES'S • SMITS:CH A NIL. Hay 41 Os Od to 41 Od Hay 31 15s to 4! 10s Od Clover 3115 s od to 51 Ss 04 Clover 41 Os to 51 Ss Od Straw 21 Ss Od to vl 5s Od Straw 11 151 to 21 5s Od PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP &c. Town Tallow ... ... 40s Od Yellow Soap ... ... 76s Od Yellow Russia ... ... 3950 d `Mottled .. . ... 825 Od White ditto .. ... —s Od I Curd .. . ... ... —s Od Soap ditto ... ... —s Od Graves ... ... ... 16s Od Melting Stuff ...... .. 32504 Good Dregs .. ... 5s Od Tallow Imported from St. Petersburgh, 105 Casks. PRICE OF NEW MCKIM EOPS, JULY 3. WOW MOS. ▪ 1054 to 1194 955 to 100. 100 s to 1101 • . 120$ to 140$ at £48,000. 'H Sussex Essex loss to 132 s Kent toos to 116. 1 Sussex 105 s to 126.' Essex Farnham fine 140$ tol Old Doty ; COURSE OF EXC Amsterdam ...12 51 CF. Ditto at sight ...12 5 Rotterdam... 2 U 12 51 Antwerp ... ...12 51 Hamburgh 21 U 13 15 Altona ... 21 U 13 151 Paris,3day'ssight 25 65 Ditto ...2 U 25 90 Madrid ..... ... 361 Cadiz ...36} Barcelona... —36 Bilboa ... —361 ANGE, Jinx S. Seville 361 Gibraltar .. 47j Leghorn 471 Genoa 25 75 Venice 471 Malta Naples Palermo .. 119 d pet os Lisbon Rio Janeiro .. 24 Dublin Cork 11 COAL MARKET, ins 3. Ships Sold. 351 10 Ships at Market. Si Newcastle 12 Sunderland t4a od 2Os Od HIGH-WATER at LONDON-BRIDGE TO.II , Morning 43 adman attar Afternoue 41 inmates after Loam= t Printed and Pub&bed by Jour blArms, at Orris. Na. i. Pickett-place. Tan* Bar. Gk abi tool h a and Cal 131 Pal had to t Price. Pig dtoslsfJ doe d to 52s heal of ioknow. F th ; user 4 Vet itter 4 nee 4 the Seta- rim IP • PRICES OF GOLD AND SILVER. Foreign Gold in Bars ... ... £3 17 II Silver, in Bars, standard . ... 0 4 911 pe an pri A: tin