Star. — London, England, 1830-03-23 00:00:00

t#‘ il\‘ hon. member the opinion that there was no distress in the manufac tarsal districts. WODEBOUSE moved for certain returns relative to the pins of foseign corn last year. His object in moving for these re turns was to expose a false statement which had been put abroad by a gentleman connected with a public department.—Ordered. Mr. SYKES, in poidponing ids motion, which stood for to.mor. row. relative to the reduction of the duty on soap. gars notice that he should move an amendment to the motion of the hon. member tor Worcester, which stood fur Thursday. The debate on the public distress would. he believed, outlast the distress itself. • EAST INDIA COMPANY S CHARTER. Sit A. CA MPBELL presented a petition from the provost and acne, ii.habitatits of Perth, praying for the removal of the East Ind.:. Company's monopoly. Ordered to be referred to the committee. NATIONAL DI/TRESS—.WOOL. Mn JAMES ORAHAM presented a petition from Spalding, Csumberiand, complaining of distress, and praying for a protecting duty on foreign wool. The 110 N. BARONET presented a second petition from the Royal Irish Mining Company, praying for a protecting duty on foreign lead ore. WELSII JUDICATURE. Mr. F. LEWIS presented a petition front the Freeholders of the County of Radnor. praying that the Assize might not be held be yond the limits of the county. They professed their vtillingness to have an amended administration of justice, but they desired not to go beyond the county to obtain it. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE cokowirs. Mr. O'CONNELL gave notice that he should, to-morrow, mt ve an Address, in order to obtain copies of the indictments under ti:eti an individual, and another noble person in Van Diemen's Land hall been tried twice for the same offence. i'be Hon. MEMBER presented a petition from Mr. M , Diarmid and two other individuals, complaining of the conduct of the Lord Mayor of Dublin in reference to the markets of that city. Mr. G. MOORE defended the Mayor, and professed that that 'magistrate was anxious to submit his conduct to investigation. • Lord LEV lISON GOWER was sure that the conduct of the Lord Mayor was dictated by a regard to the public interest. He wished that the matter should be investigated before a proper tri bunal, and he was sure that an Irish court of justice would be wil. Wig to afford its protection to the animals (bulls we believe) for which the market was intended—(a laugh.) The petition was then read. Mr. O'CONNELL next presented a petition from an individual of the name of Fox Dixon, complaining of the conduct of the cor poration of Dublin in turning him out of a coal meter's situation. Mr. O'CONNELL presented a petition from John Boyle, pray. ing that the house would reform the law for taking the poll at elec tions for the city of Cork. lie also presented petitions from Cally. beg, in the county of Waterford ; and front Dysart., in the same county, against the sub-letting and vestry acts ; from a parish in Meath, In which there were only Roman Catholic inhabitants, com. plaining that they had lately been united to a wish ten miles dis tant, and compelled for the first time to pay parish rates and ceases; and also from Athlone, complaining that the tight of returning mem bers for that borough was private property, and praying for an ahem. tion in the elective franchise of the borough. Mr. O'CONNELL presented a petition from the Licentiate Apothecaries of the county of Clare, complaining of the conduct of the incorporated society of apothemrim in Dublin, who were only twenty-nine in number, who had the power of li all the practising Apothecaries of the county--a power whi c l i h ai , n ft was alleged, they abused, by granting to any one a license who could pay 201 Mr. MOORE denied that the statements of the petitioners were true. The petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. O'COD:NtLL then presented a petition from the parish of Binds, in the county of Carlow, complaining of the grant of money to the Kildare-street Society. The same hon. MEMBER presented a petition from certain parishes in Dublin, praying that the forty-shiffing freeholders may be re.instated in their election rights.—Laid on the table. REPEAL OF THE ACT OF UNION WITH IRELAND. Mr. O'CONNELL presented a petition, very numerously and respectably signed, front the inhabitants of the city of Drogheda, i pros ing for a repeal of the Act of Union, and requiring also a re of the Vestry Aet, and some other measures. Mr. VANHODIRIGH, as we understood, denied that the peti tion expressed the sense of the influential portion of the inhabitants of Drogheda. Sir C. WETHERELL thought that a petition for the repeal of the union with Ireland, mischievous and absurd as it was—(hear, hear!) seemed also so clearly an attack on the principles of the constitution, of which that union now formed a part, that he fee one should call on the house to reject the petition at once. For that purpose he should now move that the petition be read. No member for Scotland would venture to rise in that house, and poppet a repeal of the union with Scotland ; and yet could any member say what was the difference between that set and the union ' act of Ireland. It was no party question, but one which involved the integrity of the constitution.—(hear.) Sir M. W. RIDLEY saw no objection to the Petition being received. There was no Pirliamentiuy law which forbade it; and as to its prayer attacking the Constitution, they ought to recollect that they received Petitions against the Parliament itself, which was also a part of the Constitution (hear !) Mr. LOCKHART thought the question respecting the Repel of the Union with Ireland of too much importance to be dis posed of hastily • and therefore moved that the debate be ad journed till Wednesday next. Mr. Secretary PEEL confessed he did not feel much surprised at the doubts expressed by the hon. member for the city of Oxford (Hr. Lockhart), and the hon. member for Plympton (Sir C. Wetherell), respecting the propriety of receiving a petition in support of a project so mad and so absurd—so utterly destructive of the prosperity of Ireland, and so much calculated to injure the integrity of the empire—as that of a repeal of the Act of Union. (Hear, hear.) He did not apprehend that the petition proposed a diminution of the empire, or a separation of Ireland from the controul and government vested in the sovereign of this country. Ireland was a portion of the British empire ; the king of England was also the king of Ireland, before any Act of Union was thought of ; and the petition, he sup posed, merely prayed that the two countries should be placed, with respect to each other, in the same situation as they were before the Act of Union was He doubted, therefore, whether they amid, according to passed. of Parliament, reject the petition ; bat, while he gave his vote for the reception of the petition, he could not find terms strong enough to express his reprobation of the prayer of that petition, or of his sense of the return of the attempts made to disturb the minds of the ignorant portion of the people, by a representation of the advantage Which would result from the pos session of a Parliament in Ireland. He repeated, that he could not find terms to express the strong disgust and reprobation with which he viewed the attempts made to separate them. (Hear, hear.) Mr. O'CONNELL : As to the question of the Petition for the dissolution of the Legislative Union with Ireland, be totally dif fered from the honourable member for Plympton, with respect to the regularity of that Petition, or the object which it supported.— lie did not see any reason for depriving Ireland of a separate gisiature, any more than Canada, Halifax, or Jamaica, where in dependent Representatives were permitted to deliberate on the local interests of the people. This he thought was as advantageous to the one country as to the other ; and he believed the day was not far distant when the friends of Ireland and England would unite in their consent to the repeal of the Union ; and that it would be hailed as an advantage by the best Mends of both countries. Sir C. WETHERELL declared his opinion that a petition pray. lag to dissolve the union with Ireland was something little short of tresses, and insisted that it should not be received. Mr. BERNAL expressed an opinion that the hon. member for Plympton was mistaken in the judgment he pronounced with respect to the petition. The ATTORNEY GENERAL saw no objection to its being received, although he condemned its object. Mr. HOBHOUSE spoke in favour of its being received. • Sir J. NEWPORT said, that whatever might have been his opinion of the Union formerly, he was convinced that the repeal of the Act now would be productive of the most mischievous effects. Ireland was now tranquillized and prosperous by the removal of all political disabilities, and it was most desirable that no subject of agitation should be introduced there. Mr. BROWNLOW observed, that if the feelings of the people of Ireland were really averse to the continuance of the Union, be was not only that those feelings would not be put down by rejection of the present petition, but that that would be the sure method of kindling a still stronger spirit of hostility in their minds. For his part, however, he did not think that the existence of such feelings was to be apprehended to say great extent. The interests of all classes in IMAM were so identified with the continu ance of the Union, that be was satisfied that these was no general dis. position to attack it, and be trusted that the hon. and learned mem. her for Clare would abandon the wild speculation in which he had embarked on that subject, and would devote his talents to some better and more useful purpose. Mr. HUME thought that feelings andopinions bad been ascribed to his honourable and learned friend, the member fur Clare, with. out any just cause. As to the petition, it appeared to him that to reject it would be to put an end to one of the most 'finable rights of the sub' He (Mr. liume) perfectly agreed with the right le gentleman, that the principle of a separation of the two countries was injurious; but the right of the people to tender their *dons to the house ups the subject war quite a distinet goodie. AIL Secretary PEEL, in explanation, denied that be hod ever cootesded 'Oust the eight of the people to express their opinions in this and other subjects. On the contrary, he had contended for that right. But, while he had admitted the right, he had also declared that be could not find language strong enough to .Tovi.ssi his reprobation of the doctrines which the petitioners main. With respect to what the hon. and learned gentleman had the separate legislatures of Jamaica, Halifax, and Canada, be remembered that, although they had separate legislatures, ere still parts of the United Kingdom. LOCKHART, yielding to what appeared to be the general of the house, withdrew his amendment. petition was then brought up and read. PADD INGTOY. Mr. WM/ presented a petition from the inhabitants of Pad. dington against the general watching and lighting bill. Mr. PORTA' AN observed, that by a mistake the metropolis had not been excepted from the operation of the bill, an error which, on the first opportunity, would be corrected. The petition ',Aitken ordered to lie on the table. aid of they w Mr. feeling The Mr. BYNO presented dm petitions, the one from certain cow keepers and livery-stable-keepers, the other from the victuallers resident in the Haymarket, praying to be heard against the bill for removing the Market from the street.—Referred to the committee. SUTTEES. Mr. JOHN MARTIN presentedts petition from the prominent dissenters of Tewksbury. praying for the abolition of the practice of burning Hintloo witiows.rdered to lie on the table. CHANCERY DICRZEII. On the motion of 111;.Siii4CE:Uiacidress was ordered to be presented to his Slajesty, praying that he would be graciously pleased to order that there be laia before the house an account of the decrees and orders of the court of chancery and courts of great session in t/tales during the last ten years. DISTRESS. Lord ALTHORP presented a petition from the farmers of the hundred of South Erpingham, in the county of NorAdk, corn. plaining d distress, and praying for relief. IRISH LINEN MANUTACTURE. Lord L. UOWEK brought in a bill to regulate the granting of leases gland in Ireland for the carrying on of the linen manufae. cute.—Bed a first time, and ordered to be read a second time on Thursday, and to be punted. IRISH TOBACCO. In answa to a question from Sir J. NEWPORT, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated, that it was the intention of his Majesty's government to Impose a duty on tobacco grown in Ireland ; although the details of the measure had hitherto prevented the bill from being brought in. DECCAN PRIZE MONEY. Mr. HUM, adverting to the question of the Deccan Prize Mo ney, begged to ask the Right Hon. the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in what state that property now was, as great anxiety ex. fisted, on the part of many of the claimants, to know when it was probable they would receive the remainder of their dividends. Mr. ARBUTHNOT said, that after the appointment of the trustees, they were anxious to begin the payments at as early a pc. rind as Possible. Not being able, however, to get the prize lists without a reference to India, the consequence was that their progress was impeded ; and the first payment was not made until 1826. The sum of 210,0001. was then drawn for and distributed to the actual captors, both in the army and navy ; except about 8,0001. which was paid over to Chelsea Hospital. The whole question was subsequently again brought under the consideration of the proper authorities, and it was decided that the Marquis of Hastings and the grand army were entitled to share in the Deccan prize money. There being no lists in this country, a Committee of Oilicen was appointed to give the necessary information, and to verify it. It was understood that the whole of the sums amounted to about £BOO,OOO, and the whole would have been paid, but for a communication from certain Native Bankers at Bombay, stating that a portion of the property belonged, not to the Peishwa, but to natives, subjects of this country. The Supreme Court of Judica. tore decided in favour of the natives. It was impossible, there fore, to draw the whole sum ; £448,000, however, was drawn, end distributed to the Marquess of Hastings and the grand army, with the exception of £ lO,OOO, which was paid over to Chelsea Hospital. The disposition of the remainder was referred to the consideration of the Privy Council. It would probably be determined in two or three months. The exact amount could not be exactly stated at the present moment; for there were sums arising in India to be added to It; but he be. lieved he might state, that before the termination of the summer the whole would be put in a train of payment. The money was in the treasury at Calcutta, bearing an ;merest of S per ant. Ori ginally it was at an interest on 6 per cent. and so it remained until an order came from this country for the distribution of a per. don of it, when the interest of the remainder was fixed at 5 per cent. It would be doing great injustice to the East India Com pany if he were not to add, that they had evinced the greatest liberality throughout the whole transaction. CRIMINAL LAW. Mr. Secretary PEEL presented a petition from a Society of Friends in Ireland, praying for a mitigation of the severity of the Criminal Code, and especially for the abolition of the punishment of death for forgery. Although he would not himself consent to go the whole length of the prayer of the petitioners, he felt much pleased and flattered by their entrusting the petition to his we. Mr. LENNARD expressed his regret at hearing the right hon ourable gentleman say that he was not prepared to go tits whole prayed for by the petitioners, with respect to the punishment at forgery. He (Mr. Lennard) bad last session introduced a bill on the subject; and he now gave pollee., that, early after the Easter holidays, he would again call the attention of the house to it. Mr. PILL, in explanation. said, that on Wednesday he would move for leave to bring In a bill to alter and amend the laws respect ing forgery. By that bill it would be proposed to abolish the punishment of death for forgery, in many cases. The petition was then read, and ordered to be printed. TRUCK STITZ/t. Mr. Secretary PEEL presen - -- - ieds pe ition from Stroud, in Glou cestershire, praying for the abolition of the truck system in the pay ment of wages. MESSAGE racom THE KIM_ Mr. Secretary PEEL presented a message from his Majesty, which was read by the Speaker, and which was to the following effect Oxciaoz R.—His Majesty having taken into consideration the report of the Commissioners appointed by his Majesty to in quire into the practice and course of proceeding of the superior courts of common law, is desirous, with a view to improve and ex pedite the administration of justice in England and Wales, to add to the number of judges in the superior courts ; and his Majesty Mies on the liberality of this house, that they will enable his majesty to make such pecuniary allowances to the additional judges as shall be consistent with the dignity of the judicial office, and with the nature and importance of the duties attached to it." On the motion of Mr. PELL, an address was ordered to be pre sented to his majesty, thanking him for his most gracious message, and assuring him that that house would take it into their most se. dons consideration. Mr. PEEL moved for a committee of the house to consider the message on Friday next. He did not intend by considering the ad dress to commit hon. members to anjapprobation of the provisions , of the bill. WELSH JUDICATUILZ. The ATTORNEYZEWEICAVint>veciihe first reading of the bill for the improvement of Webb judicature. A long discussion took place between Sir CHARLES WET Dz. atm., Blr. PEEL, and the ArroaxEr-Ozwzam., whether the second reading of the bill should be fixed after or before the recess : and it was finally ag►eed that the second reading should be fixed for the 27th of April next. EX-OFFICIO lEFORSIATIOXII. Sir CHARLES WETHERELL gave notice that he should move for leave to bring in a Bill to Regulate the Power and Dia. action of the Anceney-General respecting Ex-Ofilcio Informations (hear, hear, bear ! and cheers). IRMA. _ Mr. STEWART WORTLEY moved for returns relative to the inmate department of India, and an order issued by the Directors on the 11th March, 1830. Mr. HUME wished to know whether the rumour was true that the government of India at home had issued a prohibition to Lord W. Bend/Kies facilitating the settlement of Europeans in India, by which that country was likely to be so much trammed Mr. 8. WORTLEY said, that last year a notice hod irroorod la a periodical publication upon the subject, and all the ONO of DI. reams bad (loos was merely to send a letter explainiorbommos of Lord Amberst's regulation of 1824, relative to the ookkodoo of curtain produce in India. It would be laid before the committee up stairs. SUPPLY. The CHANCELLOR ofate/ICHEQUER moved the order I of the day for the house resolving into a Committee of Supply. Lord JOHN RUSSELL asked when the papers relative to Grown were likely to be laid oa the table of the house. • Mr. Secretary PEEL said that they were not yet prepared in such a manner as to be laid before the house. The Marquis of BLANDFORD asked if the Mums he bad for merly moved for, had been made, relative to the number of m ean endtkd to vote in counties, boroughs, cities, ac. throughout iite - klagdom Kr. iseeratary PEEL laid it would be impossible to make such a return, for no penes could tell whether another wee oe wee not added to vote. The number who had voted at the lam election might be returned, but be did not know what in. fames could be drawn from tbat. Mr. HUME asked fur whet paper they weft going into the comMittee ? If is wee to ewe the or ordenawn, he must say thou be would oppose it, for he was not premed, se node* having been given fur such intention ; besides, the navy estimates were not finished. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that with respect to the ordnance estimates he only intended to take a vote for 200,0001. upon account. Mr. HUMEssid he had no objection to that coupe. Lord ALTHORP asked what had been done relative to the ex penditure of the colonies, or what was the object of the commission appointed relative to them ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that it was not intended that the commission should meddle with the coned. titution of those colonies, but merely for the purpose of inquiring into their expenditure, with a view to save money. Mr. HUME said, that this was the first time he had beard of a commission, and he should be glad to bear who and what the coat. minnows were, and whether they were to be paid ; for be observed that commissioners within these last 20 years had cost the country upwards of one million. the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that the oldest members of the colonies had been selected in order to carry the inquiry into effect, and he thought it was arranged in such a manner as not to impose expense on the colonies. Sir R. WILSON inked if the commission was to inquire into the expenses of garrisons ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—Into every thing connected with the expenditure. The house then resolved itself into a committee of supply. Mr. PERCEVAL moved that the sum of 200,0001. be granted to his Majesty on amount of the ordnance of the United Kingdom. —Agreed to. Sir 0. CLERK moved that 180,0001. be granted to defray sala ries, Ac. of the officers of the navy, victualling, admiralty, and navy pa o ffi ces. Mr.HUME objected to the o ffi ces being thus classed together, instead of being taken separately. Sir 0. CIA RK said that it was usual to do so. Mr. HUM E said, that formerly a different course was adopted, and he thought it a far more convenient one. He should therefore move that the chairman do teport progress unless they were separated. Lord HOW ICK also thought it would be more convenient to have them separate. Sir 0. CLERK said hecould have no objection, and he should therefore move that the sum of 52,0001. be granted for the Admiralty. Mr. HUM E objected to the grant of 2,9101. for the paymaster of the marines. The marines ought to come under the navy, for their separation rendered two departments necessary, where one would do. As the army department was supplied by one o ffi ce, he could not see why the same rule should not be applied to the navy. The hon. member concluded by observing, that he hoped the house would support him in pressing for a reduction in the charge before the House. Mr. CHOKER was willing to admit that the Paymaster of Ma rines might be an expensive office, but he was not ono , as had been urged by the honourable member; he (Mr. g e ro s i7r; had great satisfaction in showing to the House, that since the appoint. ment of the Master of Marines, a great reduction in the barrack expenditure had taken place; from an average of seven years pre vious to the appointment of that officer, the annual barrack ex. penditute amounted to 16,8001. on an avenge of seven years sub. Sequent to his appoitattient, the expenditure was reduced to 9.4001., being about one-half what it was in former years; a similar im provement had also taken place in a situation of minor inportance— he meant the Infirmary establi4hment, the average annual expense of which, during the same period, was 1,2701. it has since been reduced to 1021. After a few words from Sir 11. PARNELL, Mr. MABERI.EY contended, that the office was wholly unne cessary, whilst such an establishment as the Ordnance was in ex istence. Sir OD )ROE CLERK observed, that the whole annual charge of the master of Marines' Office was about 3,0001. and that sun was far below the benefits derived from the office. hoed HOIVICK suggested the propriety to the hon. member for Montrose of withdrawing his amendment, and moving for a com mittee to inquire how far it would be expedient to consolidate both offices. Mr. HU3IE persisted in his original motion. PORTM AN contended, that the defence brought forward of the office was totally fallacious; by giving the vote for six months ample time was afforded to government. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that when consolidation was carried beyond a Milan t, it did not tend to wards economy; where it was the Treasury always adopted it. Lord ALTHORP spoke in support of consolidation. After a few words from Mr. Hums, the CHANcim.on of the MECHEM/1114 and Mr. BRIGHT, the house divided on the ques. don, and strangers were ordered to withdraw. On our return to the Gallery, the numbers were declared to be— For the original Resolution...l3o For the Amendment......... 90 Majority.. 4O Mr. PORTMAN said that he should towards the close of the session, move for a reduction in the salaries of the persons employed in the public ollices—that reductions should be somewhere about 15 pet cent. on the larger salaries, and 5 per cent. on those of 2001. The vote wu then put to the house and carried, A sum not exceeding 32,31,21. to defray the expense of the Navy Office for the year 1830, was next brought forward. -- - - Mr. VERNON SMITH moved that the grant should be re duced to 30,8334 were it but to show the suffering class of the com munity, that their claims to reduction were not forgotten by his ma jesty's ministers. Sir GEORGE WARRENDER said he could not vote for any reduction on the estimate before the House ; it had been already sufficiently reduced. • Mr. BANKES (of Code Castle) thought there could be no pre tence whatever for keeping a Paymaster of the Navy and Treasurer also. Mr. LABOUCHERE coocurred in the same opinion. After a few words from Lord GEOHOE BSNTINCK, Mr. C. WOOD said he should vote for the proposition of the Hon. Member opposite to reduce the salary. Sir GEORGE CLERK considered the proposition to abo lish the office less objectionable than the other propositions that had been made. )Ir. BANKES thought the paymastership of the navy ought to be abolished. _ _ _ — Sir GEORGE CLERK said, by what had already been done, there was a saving of 1,0001. and would ultimately be a saving of 1.2001. whenever any vacancy occurred, by which the individual now holding the office could be otherwise provided for. Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN protested spinet the keeping up of an useless office till the person filling it should be otherwise pro. Ivided for. Mr. BARING, jun. said seventy seamen had been dismissed, in one instance, the moment they ceased to be wanted. Why was this useless office retained till the person could be otherwise pro. vided for ? How could they reconcile to themselves to expend one shilling on such account, while men and officers were discharged the moment they were no longer wanted. (Hear, hear.) Mr. 111 A HENLEY contended that the best mode would be to abolish the office. Mr. PEE said, that almost every person who had spoken had a L. different propositon to make ; and that showed that the government had considerable difficulty to propose what should have the apple. bather of all. By the course proposed, there would be an eventual saving of 1,2001. Let the vacancy occur in its natural course. He would make this promise, that the office of paymaster of the navy should never again appear in the estimates. (cheers.) But he trusted that the house would not compel the government to turn this Individual out of his office. --- Lord HOWICH said, that the saving of money was not of so much consequence as the abolition of the office, by which there would be a removal of one Government officer from that House.— There would then be left quite enough in the House to conduct the business of the Government. He should concur in the motion of the hop. member opposite, with the view of abolishing the office. Mr. TRANT said the House ought to compel, in this instance, the immediate exercise of economy. Mr. D. W. HARVEY suggested that the Treasurer of the Navy should resign his salary, till the Paymaster of the Navy was pro. vidsd for. 111 r. F. LEWIS could not consent to any such proposition. Let the house deal with it sod be would act =media*: Mr. HUME trusted that the house would not be misled by pro. miss—let them vote on principle, and for the abolition of the Ake. Strangers were then or dere d to withdraw, a division took place, and the numbers were For the original motion Against it Majority.... 1111 Report to.toorrow. The remaining orders having been disposed of, the Howe Ad. loomed at One o'Clorl. A new writ has been ordered for Hyde). in the room 8k Retort T. Farquhar, doomed. Ht was hems* Sesviser of the lievzitina, and there were ingsidn imams" /gist him an the whim el alleged slays wads, robe beenght reed by Mr. Powell Ibutten to the Hansa of Cowmen% all slide shamans bad been detained in this country to give widow en Imo abject. to we inquiry should hare bon aimed t but whit 11/o Ilebset it is summed that charge will die away, and than is Mimeo min be no longer Mined in linglaad. MINORITY On the Duke of Richmond's motion " For a Selma Committee to inquire into the condition of the labouring Clasen, and the Rifect of Taxation upon productive Industry." Dukes. Cowper Melbourne Cumberland Tankerville Maynard Wocester Stanhope Barone. Richmond Radnor Teynhant Argyll DlStrf King Marquises. Massileid Holland Lansdowne Carearvon Vernon Salisbury Ramey Calthorpe Clanritarde =Meat !Alford Sligo Falinamth Redesdale Aileabury Stradbraka Rivera Boris. Rimmed Seaford Winehihea Vietminh. Carlisle Graoville Bishops. Bath and Wells Ferret Goderish Landalf Mom Dukes. Ortsed Churchill Newcastle 16411114 Nonherick Grafton 'Bradford Lorton Devonshire 111aaan Haddington Marlborough Lords. Howard de Walden Marquis. Waisingham Yarborough Anglesey Wodehottee Fevenham Earls. Stowell Duncan Guilford Kenyon MAJORITY. The Lord Chancellor Wicklow AreMi%hops. Hardwicke Canterbury Verolam York Glen'sll Dukes. Westmorland St. Alban's Cornwallis Buckingham Chesterfield Gordon Hendogdon Wellington Amherst Marquises. Aberdeen Bute Gower Bath Casdlis Cooyngham Darnley Hertford Clare Camden Clanwillians Cholmondeley Fife Earls. Viscounts. Bathurst Arbuthnot Rowdy's Hereford Shaftesbury Melville Pomfret Barons. Malmesbury Arden Charteeing Bayning Jersey Clifden De La Warr Clifford Dudley !ROOM Dukes. CaWas Clarence Cardigan Beaufort Cathcart Bedford Chatham Buccleuch Courtown Leeds Elgin Manchester End Montrose Glasgow Northumberland Harcourt Rutland Hopetoun Marquises. Howe Clevelaud Lauderdale DonegaU Macclesfield Manakin Morton Lothian Paulen Stafford Scarborough Thomond Somers Tweeddale Se. Germans Winchester Waldegrave Lark. Warwick Abingdon Wilton A boyne Viscounts. Ashburnham Beresford Baleares Exmouth 13elmore Gort Breadalbane Northland Brownlow Sidney Colville De Duastanville DunaUy Ellenhorough Farnborough Forrester Glen!lon Harris Hill Manners Marrbareash Kamp Proem. MINS Sesseiss Waist Wassibby d'Eresby Bishops. Bristol Rochester Chester London Winchester Oxford Barons. Abererontby Begot Clinton Donner _ _ Douglas (of Douglas) Dufcrin and Mae boy. Le Despeocer Islonsot; Plunkett Ravensworth Rolle Scarsdale Selsey Skelmendale Stafford St. Helens S cart de Roth's, Bishops. G►lisle Chichester Hereford Lichfield &. David's MINORITY Of 90, who voted for Mr. Hunte's motion to reduce the office cr" Paymaster of Marines, and consolidate it with the Navy Pay Mee. Althorp, Lord Gust, J. J. Peachy, Gen. Anson, Hoe. G. Gordon, R. Philips, G. Brownlow, C. Guise, Sir W. Portman, R. B. Blake, Sir F. Heron, Sir R. Pryse, P. Bright, Henry Hamar, G. F. Price, Sr R. Baring, Sir T. Howick, Lad Poasonby.Sloo. G. Baring, F. Hobby/m.l C. Ponaciaby, Hon. F. Beck, L. W. Harvey, D. W. Robinson, G. R. Berates, Henry Jephaon. C. D. 0. Rantaden, J. C. Buxton. J. J. Killeen, Lord Russell, Lord J. Benett,.l. Leonard, T. Smith, Y. Bernal, R. Lumley, S. Scott, Hoe. W. 11.1 Weadock, Lord G. Lktyd, Sir R. P. Stanley, Lord Biandford, Marquis Lambert. T. Seymour, Col. Caltborpe, Hon. A. Lester, B. Sibthorp, CoL Carter, J. Labouchere, Henry Trani, W. H. Cavendish, H. Martin, J. Townshend, Lord C. Cavendish. W. blildmay, P. Vyvyan. Sir R. Clive, R. B. itlaberly, J. Webb, Col. Cholmeley, N. I. hlonck. J. B. Wilson, Sir R. Dickinson, W. Marjoribanks, S. Warburton, H. Denison, J. E. Macdonald, Sir J. Whitbr•ad, W. H. Davies, Col. Nugent, Lord Waithman. Aldernus Dick. H. O'Grady. Co Wood, C Duncombe, T. G'Connell, D. Winnington, Sir T. Dondas, Sir Robert Osborne, Lord F. Whitmore, W. W. funds% Hon. T. Ord. W. Well., J. Ruston, Lord Protberoe. R. Fane, J. Parnell, Sir H. TILLER. Pyles.. T. B. Power, It. /lame, J. Fasakerley, J. N. Phillintore, Dr. MINORITY Of 50, who voted against the Vote for the Treasurer of the Navy . Althea?. Lord Fyler, T. Poyou, W. S. Beaumont. T. Gordon. R. - Ramsden, J. Bright, H. Guest, J. 3 . Robinson, Sir 0. Bengt, J. Hobhouse, J. C. Rumbold, C. E. Blandford, Marquis Heneage, 0. F. Hobart*, A. W. Baring, F. Harvey, D. W. Rowley, Sir W. Blake, Sir F. Howick, Lord Stanley, lard Buck, LW. Jephsoo, C. D. 0. Scott, W. Cavendish, W. Kerr, T. R. Smith, V. Cavendish. H. Lomb, Hon. George Smith, R. Carter, J. Lloyd, Sir 0. Sibthorp, Colonel Cholmeley, AL Leonard, Thos. B. Tosmaltend, Lord C. Carat, C. lambert, J. S. LT:bridge. Lord Dick, Hugh Martin, J. Whitbread, W. Davies, Colonel Monck, J. B. Warburton, Henry Minds', T. Moberly, J. Winnington, Sir?. Bond's, Sir R. Blaberly, Colonel Waithman, Aid. Denison, J. E. Portman, E. B. Ward, C. Dickinson. W. Pendarves, E.W. Teller. i Euston, Loki Parnell Sir H. Hume, Joseph HOUSE OF LORDS —Tins DAY. The Lord Chancellor *or Lord Wynford to sit at 10 o'closk, to hear appeah. Brown v. Bertram—appeal, partly heard, to be further beard. Provost, &c of Edinturgh v. Bruce—appeal, to be heard. Ouchterlony v. Lord Lyndoch—apPeal. to be beard. NOTICE OF MOTION. Lord Somerhill (Clanricarde)—to bring forward a motion re = the affair at Terceira—Lords ordered to be summoned HOUSE OF COMMONS—TiIIs DAY. TR1VA . 11711: 1 4& Berwick.Light Duei Bill—to be read a secocd time. Trent and Mersey Canal Bill--ditto. Monks Ingenues Enclosure Bill—ditto. Pollock and Oman Railway Bin—ditto. Lord Elksborougit—Bill to dissolve the marriage of the Right Hen. Edward Baron Ellealbeeough with the Rig h t Hon. Jane Filinabeth Baroness Ellenbcceogh, bi. now wife, and to enable bits to may pia. and for other pupae thumb mentioned—ditto. Foos lkidp Road Bill—ditto. oRDERS OF THE DAY. fluggly—Regort of the Comdttoe theme. Mum of die Oisehy—olisseeed Mose throws, le be owl laisemity 11111.—Repert et Omme Dame* Willigadmee th letee. emes. OF MOTION& Mr. OTeeitell—le one the order it the day for the resouldep of the edleeeled dile es Ms. E. Dareaport's motion for a Gee. mime to holm Ye the dhows of the country. Lod F. L. leas—,es ißlp he have se beteg is • bll 1 • masa Mole and ememi the Lam Tolle, Cosseen, sad all other Oaths lobes by local aseh. le nits, Markets, eisa.perer. all other in Inked. Lord F. L. Gower—to apply for leave to brie; in 14114.