Star. — London, England, 1830-05-12 00:00:00

MR. OWEN'S SUNDAY LECTURES. Thursday evening, according to _______ ing was held at the Mechanics' Institute, Southampton buildings, for the purpose of affording Mr. Owen an op portunity of repeating his introductory lecture to the Sun day morning course, and stating, generally, his object in this nrnv course of proceeding. The place was very par tially filled, there not being more than 250 persons pre sent; in consequence of which, we presume, Mr. Owen was not so punctual to the time for commencing business, as he usually is. At about twenty minutes past eight o'clock he entered the theatre, accompanied by Mr. J.M. Morgan, and wail received by the usual expressions of applause. Mr. Morgan introduced the business of the evening, by reading a statement of the plan and objects of the Sunday meetings, relative to which, as he remarked, so much misapprehension had arisen. Our limits will not permit us to give even the outlines of this statement, but we understand that Mr. Morgan himself intends to publish it, as an appendix to a pamphlet, in reply to the Bishop of London's recently published letter on the viola tion of the Christian Sabbath. It was stated, that the grounds upon which the application for the theatre was made to the committee of the Mechanics' Institution, were, that many individuals, who, from their earliest years had been accustomed to attend their church, but whose conscientious change of opinion had compelled them to discontinue the practice, were desirous of uniting with others of congenial minds, for the purpose of general and mutual improvement. The order of the proceedings was to be as follows :—ln the morning, the lectures were to be on the moral and social duties of man, as founded upon the principles of his nature; in the afternoon, a class for conversation and mutual improvement, was to meet; and in the evening, lectures on astromony, physiology, and other usefel branches of natural science, were to be delivered. It was determined by the conductors of these meetings, that the greatest order should be observed ; that they should preserve the same de corum as prevails at the most solemn assembly; and that every thing should be avoided that was calculated to engender feelings of irritation. Having read this pre liminary statement, Mr. Morgan proceeded to notice the resolution that had been recently adopted by the members of the Mechanics' Institute, relative to the lectures ; and animadverted on the letter of Mr. Tooke, the honorary solicitor, expressive of their illegality. It would be found a subject of curious inquiry, he observed, to determine the quality of the lectures that should be legally delivered on a Sunday morning. It appeared that in order to ren der moral lectures inoffensive in the searching eye of the law, one qualification was an essential ingredient ; namely, the admixture of some doctrine, ceremony, or mystery, not universally believed. Mr. Brougham's name, he said, had been brought forward in proof of the illegality of the lectures ; if that gentleman had given such an opinion, he was sure it must have been under some mis conception of the matter; or if Mr. Brougham did really believe that any law existed that rendered them unlawful, it was his imperative duty to move for its repeal, as being only adapted to the darkest ages of ignorance. They could not forget the words uttered by that gentleman in his memorable speech at the Glasgow University—" The great truth has finally gone forth to the ends of the earth, that man shall no more render account to man for his be lief, over which he has himself no control. Henceforth nothing shall prevail upon us to praise or blame any one for that which he can no more change, than he can the hue of his skin, or the height of his stature." If Mr. Brougham were half a century in advance of his age, the worthy honorary solicitor was a whole century behind ; freedom had, therefore, between their two legal friends, but an unequal chance in the conference. Mr. Owen neat adamant:Al the meeting. He said, the audience had been convened to hear an introductory lec ture,—to what ? Not to any thing having reference to the past history of mankind, but to a state of things al together new. The world had hitherto been governed by imagination, the state of society now, in every part of the world, rested upon a foundation for which no single fact or reason could be assigned. His principles were either true or false ; he only asked for an investigation into them, and if any individual would ',hew that any one of them was unsound, he would immediately abandon the whole. There was one certain criterion of truth, namely, that every single truth in the universe was in strict accor dance with every other truth in the universe : there could 'be no discordance between any two truths, and he therefore unhesitatingly said, that if it could be shown that one thing which he held as a principle was not so, he would immediately give up the whole of his present opinions. Mr. Owen then proceeded to read his lecture, which opened with the remark that the world was governed by public opinion ; while this was erroneous, ignorance, and vice, and misery, must prevail, as was the fact at present. His object was to form public opinion upon the immutable principles of truth, which would lead to intelligence, comfort, har mony, and happiness, throughout society. He proposed to effect his object by first tracing out the causes of ig norance and error in human society, and then shewing how the causes might be removed by a correct percep tion of the principles of our nature, and by acting in ac cordance with them. This he intended to do ; Ist, by making human nature and its laws familiar to the minds of all; 2dly, by explaining the condition that were re quired for the enjoyment of happiness ; 3dly, by shewing the erroneous principles upon which society was founded ; 4thly, by shewing the evils which these errors produced in all countries ; sthly, by demonstrating the want of wisdom in mankind, in permitting these evils to con tinue to afflict the human race ; 6thly, by explaining the natural means by which society might be removed from its present unnatural and uncivilized state, into one of intelligence, harmony, and happiness. The introductory lecture embraced the first of these topics, and its object was to show, that as a man—as well as all other created beings--received his existence and peculiar orga nisation, and faculties of feeling and thinking, independently of his own choice of volition, and was placed in a particular sphere of life, or circum stances, by a power equally independent of his own con trol ; and, further, that as his feelings, and opinions, and volitions were necessarily produced by outward cir cumstances, acting on his internal organization, it was impossible that he should be held responsible for any of them. Man was created in a certain manner, and he grew, felt, thought, willed, and acted according 'as he was f ormed ; no created being could have a mind or will of his own; it must be the mind, and will, and every thing else of that being, or power, or GOD, or whatever it might be called, by -which it was created. In the course of his observations, 'Mr. Owen requested his au ditors not prematurely to dqduct any consequences from that docrine. He knew yrilllhe prejudices entertained in favour of the doctrine of human responSibility, and the opinion that the world could Dot be governed without it, but he promised to demmunrate that there were other principles a thousand fold more powerful, that • might be substituted for it.—This is, of course, a most imperfect outline of an address that occupied upwards of an hour in reading, and therefore we.,alnaot think that we should be a meet- justified in offering any rsmarks upon it. Our readers will I be able to draw their own conclusions, as to the nature of Mr. Owen's doctrines. After the close of the lecture, Mr. Rosser submitted for the adoption of the meeting, a resolution to the effect, that the delivery of moral lectures on the Sabbath day, for the instruction of those persons who could not conscientiously attend the established or other places of worship, was highly beneficial, and en titled to public approbation, which he supported by a powerful, lucid, and eloquent address. The following re solution having been seconded, was carried unanimously : RzsoLvEn,—That in the opinion of this Meeting, the delivery of Moral Lectures upon the Sabbath, to those persons who cannot conscientiously attend the established or other places of public wor. ship, is decidedly beneficial to the best interests of society, and highly favourable to genuine charity. Mr. Owen then stated, that in consequence of the lec tures on a Sunday having been found opposed to the wishes and feelings of a large number of the members of the Mechanics' Institute, another building had been pro cured, in Leicester-place, Leicester-square, in which the lectures would, after next Sunday, be delivered. THE ECCLESIASTICAL COMMISSION. It is understood that the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, amongst their proposed reforms, will recommend the abo lition of all sinecure places in the Prerogative Office, such as those of clerks of seats, whose sole duty is that of receiving the fees collected for them from the public by their deputies. Such ameliorations are doubtless acceptable,—their principle is excellent. But if the commissioners content themselves, as their predecessors did, with such petty re forms, they will accomplish but little. The sources of the public grievances are to be found in the Courts. The extortion of a few shillings, or even pounds, is a small evil, compared with the delay of justice, and an ex pense which operates, in many cases, to a denial of jus tice. Both these evils are, as we have before urged, mainly attributable to the system and practice of the Courts. It is, therefore, only by a fearless application of a radical reform to their very constitution, that essen tial relief can be insured to the public. The absurd reverence for what is useless, and even mischievous, merely because it wears tke erugo of anti quity,—a prejudice which has often obstructed the career of improvement,—is fortunately upon the wane ; but the most superstitious adorer of " the wisdom of our ances tors," might be conciliated in favour of interfering with a jurisdiction which is an usurpation upon what is really venerable—our old Saxon law. Selden (Opera, vol. p. 1665) has demonstrated, that in respect to testaments, the most important branch of the business of our eccle siastical courts, their intrinsical jurisdiction, is not given either by the civil law or by the canon law : nay, he cites canons and decretals which expressly rupudiate it. " Generally," he adds, " the rest of them make the civil law only the square of the jurisdiction of the pro bates ; and so it is truly affirmed in our books, that the probate belongs not to the church by the spiritual law, neither is any such thing given by any late bull er de cretal from the Bishop of Rome." It came into use, as customary, about the reign of Henry 11. and it seems to have been cunningly acquired through the dexterity of the Court of Rome, and its augmentota et multiplex avaritia, as Matthew Paris says, in consequence of the judicial reforms introduced by William the Norman. In ancient Saxon times, the ecclesiastical and temporal ju risdictions were exercised conjointly by the sheriff and bishop sitting together, till they were severed by a law of the Conqueror. The barons were probably easily re conciled to the gradual encroachment of the clergy in this respect, because it did not affect them, their ma norial courts possessing an independent jurisdiction in testamentatory cases, which subsists in some to the pre sent day. It was our intention to have traced an ecclesiastical suit through all its proceedings, for the sake of showing their cumbrous, and therefore costly nature ; but even a meagre outline would extend to an unreadable length. A reference to any writer on the practice of the civil courts will sufficiently show, that without a radical change, delay and expense will continue to harass sui- ' ton, in spite of extrinsic reforms, of expedition-rules, and regulated tables of fees. The working agents in these courts are the proctors ; and it is their cost, as before mentioned, which constitute the bulk of a suitor's bill. Now it is somewhat extraor dinary, that although the fees and emoluments of the judges and officiating of f icers of the courts, down to the apparitor and crier, have been stated to parliament, there has been no return, as far as we can discover, of proc tors' fees, though attempts have been made for that ob ject. In the last session, the House of Commons called for " a copy of the table of fees which proctors are au thorized to charge for business done in the ecclesiastical courts in Doctors' Commons, and by which the judges, registrars, or deputy registrars, tax the bills of costs, in cluding the table of fees mentioned in the 136th canon." The return to this order, from the three deputy-registrars, states that there is no table of fees that they are aware of, which proctors are allowed to charge for business done in court, except the tables of 1734 and 1825 (which they must have known do not give the information required ;) and that the table of fees, mentioned in the 136th canon, relates not to proctors, but to officers of the court (are not proctors officers of the court?) and it is now obsolete and not acted upon ! The following, then, is the anomalous system of these courts in respect to proctors' costa :—The judge has no jurisdiction over costs, which are the peculiar province of the registrar ; the registrar's office is a sinecure, so that the taxation of a proctor's bill devolves upon the deputy registrars, who are themselves proctors ; and to complete the anomaly, there is no table of fees which proctors are allowed to charge : consequently, a proctor may charge just what a fellow-proctor, in the capacity of deputy-re gistrar, thinks reasonable ! This is a system open to ob jection, not only on the part of the public but of the pro fession, for it is easy to conceive thlinjustice to which it might lead. It is but just to say, that the charac ters of the present deputy-registrars are, we believe, above suspicion.—Morning Paper. There were no less than 25 charity sermons preached in 'different churches and chapels of the metropolis on Sunday morning, on the produce of which, the wetness of the day, however, was a sad drawback. Emigrants to the United States should provide them selves with gold, as it bears a premium of eight per cent. above the currency at any port of debarkatiou. They should not burden themselves with luggage, wearing apparel only excepted. However humble the dwelling, or scanty the store of the Irish peasant, the houseless and helpless beggar never in vain solicit,' shelter or relief at his hinds. It has beau computed that the house of every pow labour. ing farmer contributes, en the average, every year, no less than one ton of potatoes, worth at least 30a, to the satchel of the wandering beggar. LAW INTELLIGENCE. VICE CHANC EL COURT, MAY 11. TYLER V. DRAYTON. This cause was specially appointed for argument this morning. The Solicitor-General, Mr. Home, Mr. Agar, Mr. Pepys, and Mr. Knight, together with many gen tlemen behind the bar, were Counsel in it. The papers were of extreme magnitude, and it is anticipated that the case will take several days in argument. Some of the learned counsel had 130 and 150 guineas with their briefs. The object of the suit was to set aside u sale of certain estates, and also for the purpose of declaring null and void the deeds executed for that purpose. ROLLS COURT, MAY H. PRACTICE OP TIIE COURTCORRIE V. CORRIE. Mr. SPENCE was instructed to apply to the Court to allow this case to be put into the paper on Friday, to be spoke to on the minutes, as they had been drawn up by the Registrar directly contrary to the way in which it had been pronounced by the Court. The MASTER of the Rou.s (with some warmth)-1 really cannot allow these things ; this has of late been continually the course adopted ; parties must settle the minutes at the time the decree is pronounced. Parties or Counsel cannot have attended to the declarations of the Court. I certainly will permit these species of ap plications no longer. Mr. SPENCE had given every attention in his power to the order pronounced by the Court in this case, and he could take upon himself to say that the decree, as drawn up by the registrar, had never been pronounced by his honour. The learned counsel then stated what the de cree was that he understood the court to have pronounced, and also the decree drawn up by the registrar. The MASTER of the RoLLs—I really wish counsel would attend and understand what the decree of the court is. Mr. SPENCE—ReaIIy, Sir, I consider such observa tions as now fell from the court, entirely uncalled for in this case. I flattered myself that I understood every part of the case, and I can take upon myself to say no such order was pronounced by the court. The Registrar who drew up the order not being in at tendance, the COURT, after some further discussion, gave Mr. SPENCE leave to mention the case when he was in Court. COURT OF KING'S BENCH—WESTMINSTER, MAY 10. GAME LAWS.—CRIMINAL INFORMATION,-.THE KING v. ROIL Mr. B ROUG A U shewed cause against a rule obtained by Mr. DENMAN, to file a criminal information against William Ross, Esq. for certain statements which he en tered in a rate-book of the parish of Upham, in the county of Southampton, where Mr. Ross was the neighbour of the prosecutor, Edward Gregory Morant Gale, Esq. It appeared that the parties had lived upon good terms un til Mr. Gale prosecuted the servant of Mr. Ross for lay ing wires in Ross's ground to kill rabbits. The man was prosecuted and convicted in the . penalty of 51. without, the knowledge of Mr. Ross, who in fact had ordered him to lay the snare. This severe proceeding under the Game Laws was considered by the defendant a most un nieghbourly act; and more particularly so, as the man had long borne a most excellent character. Mr. Ross, who was Overseer of the parish, paid half the penalty for his servant, and under the irritation of the moment made the following entry in the rate-book :—" Paid 21. being the balance of 51. illegally and maliciously imposed by Edward Gregory Morant Gale, of Upton, on a poor man, who gained no more by his labour than nine shillings a week." Mr. %Lou Gnats( said he had the affidavits of five re spectable yeomen, describing the conduct of the poor man to be generally correct, and in no way connected with poaching. Lord TENTERDEN—He made this entry in the rate book, where every one might see it. Mr. Baovottam contended that Mr. Gale's conduct did not entitle him to come to this Court for the extraor dinary interposition by criminal information. Mr. FOLLET argued on the same side. Lord TENTERDEN—Who has possession of the book l in which this libel was written ? Mr. DENMAN—The rate-book goes before the Ma gistrates. Lord TEN Tgamar—Let the rule be discharged on pay ment of costs, the defendant undertaking to cause the libel to be obliterated from the rate book. Mr. DENMAN —The parish have come to a resolution that it shall be obliterated. The rule was discharged on payment of costs. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MAY 11. STRACEY AND ANOTHER V. THE BANK OF ENGLAND. This was an action tried some time since, and was brought by the plaintiffs, partners in the late banking establishment of Marsh, Stracey, and Fauntleroy, to re cover from the Bank of England 6051. I Is. Long An nuities, entered in the bank books to Sir E. Stracey and Josiah Henry Stracey, as trustees under the will of Harding Stracey, which annuities were fraudulently transferred to Gilbert Barrington by a forged power of attorney by the partner, Henry Fauntleroy, when a spe cial verdict was returned. Mr. Sergeant SPAN K I E addressed the Court this morn ing for the plaintiffs, and read the terms of the special verdict, from which it appeared that it was admitted that the stock in question was in the Bank of England ; that it was fraudulently transferred by the plaintiff's partner, Fauntleroy ; that the amount was afterwards paid into the plaintiff's banking concern ; and that the Bank of England offered an equivalent for the stock in question, provided the plaintiffs consented to give evidence, so as to enable the Bank of England to recover from the bankrupt's estates. The Learned Sergeant argued that the Bank were the mere agents of the Government, and that they were adopting a course of conduct, in thus opposing a just claim with respect to government property, that could not be justified. One ground of objection to the plaintiffs' claim was that, in consequence of some agreement between the plaintiffs and Mr.Freshtield, the solicitor to the Bank, the former agreed to receive certain dividends upon the before-mentioned stock, upon certain conditions ; but he denied that the agreement iu question could affect the right of the plaintiffs, for in the receipts given by the plaintiffs for those payments, they expressly set forth, that they received those dividends without prejudice to their right to have the stock replaced. ~ r. Sergeant TA n DY, in reply, said, that the Bank did not refuse to replace the stock in question, but they asked of the plaintiffs, in return, that they would give su c h evi dence as would have enabled them (the Bank of England) to move under the bankrupt's estate. This the plaintiffs assented to at first, but subsequently they objected coming forward, and this was the real ground upon which the Bank opposed the claim made by the plaintiffs. The Learned Sergeant then went into a variety of arguments, to show that the Bank of England were not liable, as they had not possession of the property sought to be re covered, and that upon the special verdict that had been found by the Jury, he trusted the Court would be of opinion that their judgment must be in favour of the Bank of England. • Mr. Sergeant SPA Nx Zs having replied, The Cu tar JUITiCE said, the Court would sake time to consider the case. • - POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. On Saturday the servant of Charles Preston, Esq. war rh arg ,s b , the Hon. Secretary of the Society against Cruelty, under blt Martin's Act, with having violently whipped the horse—Finis! 10, and costs ; and the driver of the Brixton errand-cart (113,72 G) %Ai likewise charged by the Hon. Secretary with having cruelly beak/ a hone with the but.end of the whip. He was also fined 10s. BOW-STREET. JOSEPH ADY.—Yesterday Joseph Ady war charg e d at Office with obtaining a sovereign from Mr. Blamire, a solicitor, l in Norfolk-street, Strand, under false pretences. Killion Rido rev was also charged with being an accessary to the fraud. There was also, as will be seen below, a second charge of defrauding Mr. D o betty, M.P. the Solicitor-General of Ireland, of the like sum. Mr. Blamire stated that a few days ago he received a letter from Joseph Salkeld, Esq. of Home Hill, near Carlisle, his intimate friend and relation, in which that gentleman informed him that he had received a letter signed " Joseph Ady, 21, Hound:ditch,- stating that he was in possession of information of vast conseque., e to him, relating to property to which he was entitled, and that the fullest particulars of such information would be given on the sum of 20s. being paid by Post-o ffi ce order or otherwise. M r . S a lk e ld en. closed a copy of the letter, and requested witness to make the e au. sary inquiries. Witness accordingly wrote to Ady, and informed him that the sum required would be paid on its being satisfactorily proved that the information offered would be of value to Mr. Sal. keld. In consequence of this letter the defendant Ridgway, al.o represented himself to be the servant of Mr. Ady, mud upon witness yesterday morning at ten o'clock, and said he was pre. pared to give the necessary information on payment of the twent% shillings. Witness said he would give the money, but it must ht upon the condition that it should be immediately returned if the in formation proved to be of no value to Mr. Salkeld. This Ridgsas undertook should be done, and received a sovereign, at the a.m,. time handing over three pie ces of pa signed Joseph Ady, stat i c, . that Mr. Hi , Jos. Salkeld, of Home per Cumberland, was entitled. as nearest relative of Barclay, Salkeld and Co. of Liverpool, merchants, and Chu. Salkeld and Geo. Salkeld, of Manchester, manufacturers, to i large sum of money, arising out of the an. claimed dividends of bankrupts' estate. 11'itness immediatels knew that Mr. Joseph Salkeld never had any relations hearing the Christian names of Barclay, Charles or George, and he told Rids. way that Mr. Ady was a complete swindler, and that he must in. scantly return the money. Ridgway refused, and absolutely laughed in his face, and witness called a police constable, and gave Lim into custody. Richard Marl, a police constable, 'f 102, letter F." stated tin: be took Ridgway into custodi, and found upon him two sovereigns. which he now produced. Witness asked where he got the mho sovereign, and he said he had received it from a gentleman, t. whom he had been on a similar errand, at No. 9, Suffolk.plac: Pall-mall, East. The constable, by the desire of Sir Annan° BISWIE, went of' to Houndsditch to desire the attendance of Mr. Joseph Ady, witt whom he appeared just before the closing of the Office. The . evidence having been repeated in Ady's presence, he stated. in answer to the charge, that the information he had furnished sr. correct. Mr. Blamire—That I deny on my oath. Ady—Weil, at all events, such was the information I received. Sir R. Btaxm—And pray how did you receive your informs. tion ?—Ady : Through my agents. Sir R. BillNlE—Who are your agents ? Ady—..(smiling)—Nay, nay, that won't do ; that's a secret. An officer being sent down to No. 9, Suffolk-place, to inqu:r: from whom the second sovereign was obtained, stated, on his return, that Mr. Doh, M.P. the Solicitor-General f o r I re l an d, was th e person defrau d; but that he had gone down to the House ()- Commons, and could not attend until another day. Sir R. BIIINIE—The Solicitor-General for Ireland ! come, Mr. Ady aims at high game, however. Ady—There was no fraud, Sir Richard, in that case. Toe cannot suppose I would attempt to take in an Irish Solicitor. General. Sir R. Maxis—Why, I don't know that. Ido not pretend certainly to be so shrewd and acute as the teamed Solicitor. General for Ireland ; but you once attempted It upon me, and I thought I should have been one of the last to be selected as a person to prac. Use a fraud upon. In future, Mr. Ady, I hope you will not trouble me with your letters. Ady—No, Sir Richard, I shall not. I have emoted your name from my bo ok. (A laugh.) You were the wrong sort of customer for me. After wane farther conversation, both defendants, .tdy cr,d Ridgway, were ordered to enter into recognizances to apppear on a future day, which they did, and were liberated for the present. NEW STAMP Durtes.—Never was so powerful and complete an union of sentiment or action organized upon any subject of public interest; the universal voice of Ire land is uplifted against the unwise and ruinous project ; and in the four Provinces not a single dissentient to tit, national feeling. The country has spoken out fearles. , !y against a tax, whose operation will stamp a virtual inter dict upon the diffusion of knowledge, while it offers a premium to the growth of ignorance and crime. Tat men of the most opposite political creeds, and in every grade of society they are to be had, we shall find them all determinedly coalesce to resist this wicked and des potic measure of taxation, though, it is singular, wide as the Poles asunder upon every other subject of political economy or national concern. And the reason is obvious —the question is not an isolated one, or partial in its sphere of operation ; it affects every human being in Ireland : there is attached, then, to it a community et feeling and an identity of interest beyond any other; fur generations yet unborn may be destined to curse its ma lignant influence. Since that tax of detestable memory. which entailed years of mortal disease and plague upon Ireland, that infamous tax upon the light of Heaven, we know of none so deservedly unpopular as this. There is not one redeeming quality to save it front that indignant condemnation we trust it will meet. We believe the Irish Members are resolved to do their duty this once— their constituents expect it—and the eyes of the country are fixed upon them. We hail, as au auspicious omen. the meeting in London, last Monday, persuaded that the majority of our Representatives will subscribe to the re solutions there adopted. Discretion is the better part of valour, and we can't imagine that the Chancellor of the Exchequer will be bold enough to hazard his character as a sage statesman, in futile opposition to the voice of Ire land. Should he persist in this odious assimilation scheme, the failure must be as signal as it is merited, and the attempt will attach eternal disgrace to the Atirut nistration.—Linterick Chronicle. BIRTHS. At Templenoeilebe, Tipperary, the lady of the Rev. G. Will:. of a son—At Rathleale, the lady of Captain Leighton, Kith meet, of a daughter—At the Parsonage , Daresbiary, Cheshire, ite lady of the Rev. C. Dodgem, of adaughter-11Irs. alayuard. Kcppel-street, RusealLaquare, of a son. MARRIED. At Weymouth, by the Rev. H. T. Pare Brymer, James Brymer. Esq. to Helen, third daughter of Sir W. Lewes Oro. Thomas, Batt. At St. Pancras church, F. W. Bushill, Esq. of Southamptor:-.t. to Harriet, daughter of T. Morton, Esq of the Victualling.ofEce. Somerset-place—ln Castletown, C. Paul, Esq. to Henrietta, third daughter of the late Rev. (1. Wybrants—At Limerick, T. Levi'. Esq. Lieut. 48th regiment, to Jane Alicia, daughter of Al. DA!- ton, Esq. of Ross-Castle, Clue—At Kihush church, D. Dal), Esq. solicitor, to Jane, third daughter of R. Parkinson, of Broom. bill; Clue, Esq—At St. Ann's church, Dublin, J. F. Clarke, Esq. M. D. Physician to the Forces, to E. 11. Josephine, daughter of J. Nuttall, Esq. of Tittour, Mount Kennedy—J. W. Morton, Esq. of Hacketstown, county Carlow, to Elizabeth, daughter of J. Fo. Esq. of Galtrim-house, county Meath. DIED. Aged 20, after a lingering illness, Catherine, daughter of Mr. Adams, of Brompton-square-..At Highgate, Mary, the wife of it Belcher, Esq. aged 141—In New Broad.street, after a very short ill. ma, aged 7 years, Frederick, the son ill. Dyke—At ilemingio: Grey, Mary Jane, wife of the Rev. J. W. deldart, LL. D. Regio Professor of Civil Law, Cambridge—At Overbuy, In Woreesto• shire, Penelope, widow of the late J. 'Martin, Esti. H. P. tor Tewksbury—At Woodhill, Hats, Jane, widow of the late W. Franks, Esq. of Beech.bill, Herter.-At Neves, p ewee , J ane F i ll. city, relict of the late J. Hazy, Rog—Elisabeth RIIOOIII4 cr. ? ! daughter of the late A. Mackinnon, in her 17th year—At Brant'. too, Jane, only daughter of the late W. Hamilton, Esq. HIGH-wATER at LONDON-BRIDGZ TO•111018110W. Morning 8 Wows after $ • A hemp= . 41 animas after 6 : Prthted acid Pubßobed by Jour Marva, at du eras• Onus No.l, Plebottiobas,7bagd• Bar• A I