Star. — London, England, 1829-06-30 00:00:00

lA. This case came on in the shape of exceptions to the • Master's Report. The bill was filed for the adminis tration of assests under the will of the late Duke of Roxburgh, and a decree was pronounced referring it to the Master to take an account of debts. Among the debts were those of Lady Mary Kerr and Lady Essen , Kerr, the co-heiresses of the Duke. The Master, in pur suance of the decree, had instituted the necessary in quiries. and among te debts brought in was a bond, dated the 15th of July, 1815, conditioned under the penalty of 20 0001. to pay 10,0001. This bond had been brought in by Messrs. Coutts, and Mr. George Hibbert appeared to be the surety. The debt had been allowed by the Maiter. Another bond was afterwards brought in by Mr. George Nicholl, of precisely the same date, conditioned under the penalty of 24,0001. for the payment of 12,0001. which the Master bad dis allowed. Mr. Nicholl was the King's bookseller, re siding in Pall mall, and it was alleged that the bond had been given partly for money advanced and partly for services performed. The Report of the Master bad since been made, and he had found that it was a volun tary instrument, and not given as a security or indem nity for any debt. Air. PEMBERTON appeared as Counsel for some of the parties ; and Mr. TIERNEY and Mr. STUART for others. His Honoust thought this was a case in which the assistance of a Court of Equity was peculiarly required. Mr. TIERNEY submitted, that as most of the witnesses were dead, and the evidence was chiefly documentary, a Ccnrt of Equity would decide without the assistance of a Court of Law. Tile MASTER of the Rox.r.s asked whether a single . instance could be shown where in such a case Equity had acted upon its own responsibility without the aid of s Court of Law ? This was a case of presumption, and that presumption was extremely strong against Mr. NichoU. Some evidence had been read at the bar, and it appeared that Mr. Nicholl could not tell to whom he advanced the money. Although a bookseller, and a man of business, it did not appear that he kept any books in which any entries of these alleged advances had been made, Mr. TIERNEY urged that there would be no utility in directing an issue in such a case as the present. The MASTER of the ROLLS-- 41 Cite to me a case where a contrary course has been pursued." • Mr. STUART believed that all panics consented to take the opinion of the Court. Mr. PEMBERTON observed, that there was a question of Johnson u. Ross, where the question was upon two ,old bonds. in which his Honour had not directed an • issue. It was true there had been an appeal to the Lord Chancellor, and the question was now pending. 1 . Mr. Pares said that his Lordship had that very morn- i ing directed an issue in the cases The Man•za of the ROLLS said, after that statement, • he could nct do otherwise than direct an issue. After some further discussion, his Honour directed : three issues upon the question—first, whether the parties were indebted to Mr. Nicholl in the sum of 12,0000 second, whether the bond . was or was not voluntary ? and. thirdly, whether it was to be considered as a gift? COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Weenniness, Jess sa. LIMO. ON TIM WILD CSANCIILLON. THE KING C. ALEXANDER, GUTCH, AND TIMER* Mr. Sergeant WILDE this day opposed the rule ob. rained by the ATTORNST•GENERAL, calling on the defendants to show cause why a criminal information r• should not be filed against them for the publication in ' the Morninc , Journal of a libel on the LORD CHANonr. - • lon. The Learned Sergeant appealed in behalf of Gutch only, and expressed a hope that Mr. Attorney. General would not consider the prosecution of his client necessary for the support of the Lord Chan. cellor's character. He was aware that Mr. Gutch was responsible in law for what appeared in the Paper of which he was part proprietor, but the policy of the law only required such persons to be before the Court as appeared to be the real authors of the alleged libel. When that object was obtained, the end of justice must be answered. It would appear that Mr. Alexander was the editor, Mr. Fisher the printer, and that Mr. Gutch was wholly unconnected with the management of the paper. The individuals who had the conducting of it were before the Court, and his hope was that the high feeling of the Lord Chancellor would be maintained by releasing an unoffending man from the prosecution.' Mr. Gutch stated in his affidavit that Mr. Alexander had been for many months editor and one of the proprietors of the paper. When Mr. Gutch became interested in the property, he made inquiry and had reason to , believe that Mr. Alexander was a person who would conduct the Paper in a moral and moderate manner. When he became concerned with Mr. Alexander. a good understanding prevailed among them on the Ca tholic Questi^n, the Shipping Interest, and other matters, but since the deponent had ceased to act with them things had taken another course. He also said, that finding the Paper conducted with less moderation than he expected, he had thought of withdrawing from the Proprietors, and he swore that he had been bona fide endeavouring to withdraw from all connexion with the Paper, but could not do so. He was in Worcestershire in a bad state of health when he beard of the cri minal information and libel. He came to town im mediately, and endeavoured to release himself from the Paper. Ile had not been able to do so, but expected to be able; the deponent denied that he had been a party to any libel on the Lord Chancellor. The Learned Sergeant had an affidavit also denying that there was any foundation for the charge against the Noble and Learned Lord, but he did not consider it necessary to read it, because no one could believe there was the slightest ground for such a charge. Mr. Gutch said he was willing at any sacrifice to withdraw himself from the paper. The Learned Counsel submitted that the case of his client was one which.ought to release him from responsibility. Mr. Gutch had come to town from a sick bed, and had been rendered worse by the present circumstance. He bad never conrcmpla.ed giving the Lord Chancellor a moment's pain, arid he hoped that the Attorney General would consider that be ought to be released from the criminal information. Mr. F. POLLOCK, on the same side, called upon the Court to consider Mr. Gutch an innocent person. Mr. HILL also contended that there was nut a case to warrant the Court in making the rule absolute as against Gutch. The Common SERGEANT slid he appeared for Mr. Alexander, the Editor of the Morning Journal, and he begged leave to express his acknowledgme•in to the Attosoey General for alto* ing the rule to stand open for this discussion. The anxious wish of his client was, that those who were concerned in the paper, but who Lid no knowledge of the objectionable paragraph, might tc released from all responsibility. The Learned Corn) Sergeant then proceeded to argue the alleged it should appear to the' Court that the ap did not come within the ordinary rules their Lordships granted criminal inform- . 41 ! • 4.. - ~~. e. - , ' • • '. rim, the rule mast be discharged. If ever there was a case which required the parties to go to the common channel of justice it was this. He really was struck with the novelty of the proceeding.' It was the first time that any great publiefunctionary so high as the Lord Chancellor had taken such a course. Could any one suppose the Lord Chancellor guilty of the corrupt motive- imputed to him ? Was not the Noble and Learned Lord enjoying the confidence of his Sovereign and presiding in the Cabinet, and was such a person to come into Court for a criminal information against the printer of a Journal? During many years it had been well known to all that attacks were made on the character of individuals high in office, but they had found it convenient for their own importance to leave those attacks unanswered. It was not that those darts of calumny were not injurious that they were not repelled, but because they felt themselves in a coat of mail, Which protected them in their situation against such attacks. When an attack was made upon a dis tinguished Officer of State, it bad been found necessary to direct the Attorney General to proceed against the offending party es eacio, and he could see no reason for departing from that practice in this instance. The Attorney General had said the Noble and Learned Lord had sot been anxious formerly to press the severity of legal proceedings against those who offended others—then why act with severity against those who offended himself ? He could not but feel surprise that the Noble and Learned Lord should have selected this obscure Journal for prosecution. The circumstances under which the libel was formed appeared too ludi crous for the attention of the Lord Chancellor. There was a conversation between Corporal Trion and Uncle Toby. It was said there was to be a new appointment, and that Sir N: Tyndal was no longer to be Solicitor- General. Mr. Brougham was applied to, bat he looked up to the Rolls—(A laugh at the expense of Mr. Brougham, who was seated by the Common Sergeant.) It might have been the Attorney-General—(a laugh)— but Mr. Sugden was mentioned, and then came the re ference to Uncle Toby:—"lf a man ler.d money, what did he expect "To be promoted," (Jade Toby replied.— "If a Captain lends 1,0001. to his Colonel what does he expect? To be made a Major.—lf he should lend him 30,0001. what then ? He would stand in the Ge neral's shoes." Then it was said, "this we admit is reason satisfactory—reason which Mr. Sugden and another Learned Personage can answer." Such was the article which the Lord Chancellor considered a charge of something corrupt between him and Mr. Sugden. He thought there was nothing in it but ge neral satire. All that he could suppose from it was that Sir E. Sogden had lent 30,0001. but to whom he could not arose. What was he to get by standing in the Generals shoes. What Gener a? It might be the late Solicitor General, or the Attorney General —but it was all in military phrases, and be could not see bow it could apply to the Lord Chancellor. He then *dented to the affidavit of Mr. Alexander. who swore that the article wan not published to impute any corrupt motive to Lord Lyndhurst, nor did be believe that any pecuniary transaction passed between him and Sir E. Sugden. The article was not written to apply to the Lord Chancellor, nor did it ever occur to the deponent that the Chancellor would ever have made it apply to himself. This affidavit stated in positive terms that he had no intention to cast imputation on the Noble Person. It might be a libel on the party to whom it did apply, but the Court would not call upon , Mr. Alexander to criminate himself by naming the per , son to whom it did apply. Mr. Lwow, who appeared for John Fisher, read the affidavit of his client, stating that be received a weekly salary at the office of the Morning Jamul', and that be had no profit in the sale of the Piper. He bad no in terest in the circulation. He never in his life used any expression to the injury of the Lord Chancellor, and did not consider that be ought to be subject to acrimi nal information. The Arroaontz GENERAL said the Court had nothing to do with the views taken of the libel by the Lord Chancellor ; the Court were to treat the Lord Chancel lor as they would any other person applying for jus tice. The Lord Chancellor was before their Lordships on affidavit, and they would deal with it hi due ezetcise of their judgment. If the Court should be of opi nion that those persons who were employed to serve the 1 press, and whose names had been sent to the Stamp office, should not be prosecuted, they would not be in cluded in the rule; but if their Lordships should hold that those persons were responsible. he was sure tbe well known liberality of the Noble and Learned Lord would not be wanting. With that, however, the Court bad no. thing to do. With respect to the case of Alexander, it was with pain be rose to address the Court. His Lear ned Friend Mr. Denman bad been betrayed by zeal for his client, to assert a doctrine which he sever expected to bear from him. What did his Learned Friend mean by saying that Ministers of the Crown, when libelled, did not come before the Court for informations, and', that the Lord Chancellor had found it necessary to do that which his predecessors had not done ? Would his Learned Friend continue an advocate for es-elide informations? It had always been held that the pro ceeding then before the Court was more consistent with rational liberty. In all cases of libel he had always been of opinion that the most tender mode of proceeding was to give the defendant an opportunity to defend or miti gate the libel by affidavit. The object of the Lord Chancellor in this case was, to give the defendant an opportunity to justify the charges which made the Lord Chancellor appear unfit to hold his office. He could not agree with Mr. Denman that it was impossi. ble the libel could apply to the Lord Chancellor. If the Court should be of opinion it did not apply to him, die Lord Chancellor would be satisfied. The Attorney- General den read the libel.--" Mr. Sugden is to be Solicitor General. The reasons which led to his pro motion are really so natural that we beg leave to ex plain them." Did the writer not mean to explain the motives? How did he explain? Why in a mannet which no person could misunderstand, and the am- biguity with which he wrote the libel was not to exclude persons from coming to the natural conclu ion. He proceeded with a decalogue, in which he spoke of promotion and the lending of money, and concluded by saying, 4 4 there is reason in this, and potat in the argument, which Mr. Sugden and another Learned Personage cannot be at'a loss to understand." The affidavit of Alexander was certainly most extraor dinary. All he said was that he did net mean to make the libel apply to the Lord Chancellor. This proved what some men sere in the habit cf doing to promote' 'the sale of papers. Could any man refuse to admit, that the person who wrote the libel was too cowardly to support his assertions io a Court of Justice? They were told that the palladium of public liberty was in the hands of such men. No person in England who had his senses could doubt that Mr. Alexander did mean the Lord Chancellor. Mr. Denman had supposed the paragraph applied to himself, Mr. Brougham, and Sir N. Tyndal ; but it was the first time he had ever beard it meant any other personthen theLordChaseeller. Mr. BROUVHAM followed OA the sense side: Lord MITIRDIIII said chitchat bad been made that the Lord Chancellor had not done all the Court re quired, namely, that be had not denied every corrupt motive. The Lnrd Chancellor had drilled the imputa tion of the Publisher, and done all the Court could re quire. Mr. Alexander bad stated in positive 'terms thit he did not mean this to allude to the Lord ChAiteeilor, but that was a qdeition which, necoraink to the pie. tice of the Court, Must be submitted to a Aril, and that no prejudice might arise from any opinion he might express, he should only say it would not be proper to alter that practice. With regard to the other two de• fendanto; one of whom was a Proprietor and the other a Printer, and who said they had no concern in the pub lication, it was admitted that they were legally revon sible, and he was not aware of any case in which the Court had released persons legally tesponlable. The Court under all the circumstances held that t he rule must be made absolute. It was accordingly made absolute. Common e m thc:itioa • by which ~. , . r ;'>ct -;;113,73,, . • • i • ,': • ''' 4, ..... ~ , 4.4 I , l ki - t• • 4 k , - f ~, ,1,.... sk , • ' ,-. lAA y a - -,............-% .1.; . ..... t t!kilG :NCB. . . 3 • - xr.: ••• '• '' .' "- 13411 • L . ROLLS' CO Ants 49. le THZ ZARL 01 WINCHILSZA V OA HITT!". POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. Yesterday crowds attended at the Mansion-Hoom to witness alt oecood examination of Isaac Addenlseoie, Charles Barlow, Jaws Some/ Andrews, and William Mennen, who were btought ap by John Forrester ' the o ffi cer, charged with having obtained a great variety of goods of all descriptions from tradespeople under , false pretences. Mr. Charles Phillips and Mr. nobler, jun. attended for the pro secution, and Mr. Humphreys for the prisoners. James Shepherd, the 300 of Mr. Shepherd. a respectable sta dotter, stattd, that be went by the direction of his father, to the house- of Messrs. Addenb.rooke and Co. Earl.street, Illacktriars, _ _ with some account books on the 27th of May last. Re was told by his father that Mr. Addenbrooke would pay for the books, but when w:ttiess called. the servant girl, who tur u rd out to be Ileumll, the wife of one of the prisoners. said her master was not at home. Witness left the books and called several times, bait never I got a farthing of the motley. Mr. Shepherd stated, that Addentarooke called at his shop and ordered the honks, saying he wanted them for commercial purpo.ies and that be would pay for them immediately upon delivery. The books were immediately afterwards found at a pawnbroker's shop, where they had been pledged, without being ever used. Mr. Phillips submitted to the Lon, Mares that this was a lase evidently of premeditated fraud, and be thought that Addeo brooke might with justice be sent to a Jury upon it. Mr. Hobler, the chief Clerk, stated, that the case bad certainly every appearance of a swindling transaction. Sim HenneU curtsied to the Loan Mavis" ani acknowledged that she bad passed as setvant-maid. The Lean M6voa—Credit has been given hero, and lir. abets. herd, by his conduct, sanctioned it. It will not do for a ins y. Mr. Phil Ups—l have a letter in my bands from Messrs. Lealby and Co. of Birmingham, which states against chase people what amounts to a charge of forgery. They have passed upon that house a bill in the name of a pretended firm, called " Dyer, Fry, and' Co. of ClerkenwelL" Phillips, the prisoner, said he should espial,' that matter very , fully : there had been formerly a firm of that name, " Dyer, Fryi and Co." in Ray-street, Llerkenwell, as he well knew, for he hap pened to belong to it. TbaLoanklavol—Howdid you belong It? . - Phillips—l was a partner in it.—(Laughter.) Mr. Joseph Wesley, of Graceeberch. street, stated, that a couple of months ago, a Gentleman requested that he would inquire into the respectability of Messrs. Dyer, Pry, and Co. He accordingly went to Ray-street, but be found the concern of such a nature • that he thought it unnecesszsy to make any inquiry. The Loan Maroc—Was there no appearance of commercial business? Mr. Wiley—Not the least. Mr. Wesley said, that the letter in question from Messrs. Beaiby and Knott, are iced that morning, and was mused by the publicity given to what had taken place at the Mansion House a few days ago. relative to the prisoners. The Solicitor to the prisoners said, that there was no charge whatever substantiated against his clients. The letter might have been written by any person present. Mr. Wesley said that be knew Mr. Bealbr's writing, and had no doubt of the correctness of the statement. Mr. Phillips—This is surely a statement sufficiently strong to warrant the Loan MAYOR hi remanding the prisoners. The Loan Maros—Certainly there is some ground for re. mending the prisoners. There are two most serious charges, and we mast give opportunities of investigating them. ilia Lordship asked where the prisoners were found. Forrester said, that he and a Gentleman named Groves, whom they had attempted to defraud, went to the house in Earl-street, and found four of the partners in the kitchen, over some ale and a pack of cards. A Gentleman stated, that the firm is a great deal more exten sive than was generally supposed. The gang was a very large one. There were three or four gangs of them, in fact, infesting different parts of the City, and recommending each other to tradesmen. Some of the prime movers of the gangs were in the King's Bench Prison, and, in fact, it was in debtors' prisons that the plans of fraud were generally laid. Mr. Phillips hoped that justice would not be frustrated in this Cast. Mr. Mohler. jun. said, that Mr. Bealby could be is town by Wednesday, to give evidence relative to the charge of forgery. The Solicitor to the prisoners asked what charge was against Andrews, Barlow, and Heinen ? He did not hear a word against them. The Lour MAYOR said, that they were an belonging to the a part in it too. by pretending to be the servant. firm, and they should all be remanded till Thur.day, in order that milers who had been defrauded might come forward. His Lord. ship considered that it was in cases of this nature the Press ei ercised one of its most important functions. AU the prisoners were then remanded till Thursday. No body appeared to hail any one of them. BOW-STREET. Yesterday, -- Godfrey, the proprietor of the Marquis of Anglesea public house, in this street, appeared before Sir R. Beams and Mr. Milani:Li., in consequence of complaints preferred against him by several respectable persons, as to the disorderly state of Ms house. It appeared from the statements of several witnesses, that the defendant's house was open at between three and four o'clock ou Monday :nornimg, and that upwards of one hundred persons, con sisting of thieves, pickpockets, journeymen tailors, and prostitutes, were enraged in keeping it up" withinside- Three of the most disordetly of those persons were brought before the Magistrates, and held to bail. Mr. Kenneth, the hookseikr, and others, deposed to the dime. derly character of Godfrey's house. Sir It. Brame said, that be was himself an eye-witoess of the riming that took place in the street, at that early boor in the morn ing. Ile had been awoke from his sleep by the noise. The Magistrates Stied Godfrey a under Mr. Nstcoort's New Act, fcr keeping a disorderly house. UNION-HALL Saturday the driver of a can, the property of J. Mascot, of &reatharn, was charged under Mr. Martin's Act before Unlimia, by the Secretary of the Society against Cruelty to Animals with baying treated a blind horse with great barbarity. It appeared that it had been out twelve hours, and was quite broken down. The driver pleaded is his defence that it was tired; but the worthy Magistrate bard him ins. to the King and ts. costs, and observed ' that the public were under great obligations to the prosecutor for his exertions in the clime of humanity. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. The Lady who underwent as examination on Friday on a charge of stealing two cambric pocket handkerchiefi from Mr. Sibley, in Regent. street, the anal decision of whose cue was postponed until Saturday, appeared with her bail at one o'clock before Mt.Conairr. After the exiiration of the usual time, the worthy. Magistrate we. informed that there appeared no prosecutor; when Mr. Flutter sod Mr. Sibley's shopmea were called, but neither of them answering, Mr. C2llliflt informed the Lady that she was discharged. The Lady thanked the Worthy Magistrate, and we. about re. tiring, when Mr. Coexist observed, that she had a very narrow escape, and be trusted that die would be mere careful for the future how she touched things when she entered into a shop again. The Lady expressed her thanks, and said that it certainly would be a caution to her for the future. Mr. Conant then asked fee Hain" the constable, when he was informed the constable was not in attendance. Mr. Comae—He ought to be, fee the mosey and other ankles ought to be given up; the money especially. The Lady wu then asked bow snack mosey was in her parse ? Ste replied, she could not say; for she had ao recollection what sum eke took out with her on die day in question ; but she bad no doubt that every thing would be delivered to ber.—She then left the ace. Saturday a respectable Waist yens man of the name of ,Willions Russell was brought before Mr. GUM; charged with steeling a large painting from the rinkleace of a person of the name of Fow lers. In Carnabt.street. Mt. Fowles deposed. dot dont bail* At o'clock a reins tame to bin bed-rsosi 'bid tutorial( icina that do paining Mkt hang in the passage was stolen; om Phis down stairs be. law thfr orieener ih custody and the painting-by the door ; and the ass n. 'iSdileid wee the dine Which bad been hang* : i n bi w p a i age , sad wide% ini of upeis FH4I3, night. The rsibjeet of the Alining I'9re/sated an elderly man in Turki:b tires., italtdinlybelor* a prison. and is the act of ad. dresziag 3 tenrale who was luokinkli e Seen from a window ; in his right arm be held a dagger with tar h hit had 'muscled !mi le s, Mr. Cooanr--itow did he girt into the home? Witness-1 do not know; en searebidg Ids) I latch Imp was found which will open cheddar and which I supra he did. Mrs. StePisein deposed that le resides opposite to iltr. Fowlers, and upon Saturday morning she was looking oat g kir window, when she saw the prisoner and another person *ilk ip and down the Street several times ; suddenly she lost tight elf them. Shortly after she saw the prisoner come out of the hoese of Mr. Fowlers with the painting on his shoulder; suspecting be bad stolen it, she Writ and gave information of the robbery to a person in the boost, and in about a platter of au hour she saw the prisoner braoght back. A constable deposed, that in consequence of intormation he went after the prisoner, whom he overtook by Poland-street, with the painting on his shoulder. On coming up the prisoner eti.teavourei to drop the painting, but be seised bold of him. lie then fell opal his knees, and begged to be forgiven, saying it was the first time be bad ever committed any offence. Mr. Cousin asked the prisoner if lie had any thing to say ? The prisetwr in teply said, he had about six o'clock met a person with Air pa . gon bit shoulder, who o ff ered him Is. ad. to me it as far as Crown.stieer, and be ing out of employnsentbe accepted the offer. Mrs. Stephens--I saw you come out of the house. The prisoner woo hilly committed for trial STIRLING JOURNAL, Juin 25. Fowl Lives Lose. SY BuaN:"o.—lc is a curious fact that there is a ream of cal, at the coal works situa'ed between New Sauchie and the River Devon, which is at pie•ent burning underground. ELI is said to bare done so Fir many years past; and though repeated eTorts have been made to extinguish the fire, they have been hitherto unavailing. Whether the latter state , ment be correct or no, is a niatter of comparatively little importance to t!.e 'subject before us—it is slit& cient fm us to know that such' a fire exim. and ,has caused the death of four individuats in the most shock. ing manner. Early on the morning of Monday last, two men and two women had gone so fir down this burning pit, for the purpose of !wilding a dyke, So serve , as a barrier betweets the coal that was not Ignited, ' and the burning moss, and had not been tang en. gaged at their work, when the roof fell down behind them, and shut them in, close to the lime. —lt is scarcely possible to conceive a more horrific situation. They had entered in a sloping direction—the earth had fallen behind them. and there they were ea 'tombed alive, amid the burning embers and smoking turf. Escape was out of the question. The enfortusate sufleren were literally burned to a cinder. Their si. tuation, however. dreadful as it war, son bmma known to their neighbours.—in a short time after the roof fell in, means were taken to extricate them. First, one woman was discovered. whose hand was burped off, and her body shrivelled to a skeleton, and another about ten yards farther in, and at last the twhmen were also discovered still farther in, and nearer to the burning mass, the blackened corpses lying, as it were, in etch other's arms. It was some time before any one could approach the place where the bodies lay, on.acconnt of the Rime; and when they did reach them, they were almost totally consumed. Their remains were ton. 'eyed to their friends in the course of the day. but were so much disfigured that it was not only difficult to re cognise the bodies, but even to distinguish the men from the women. Both the men were married,but the females were single. Tuesday last the ceremony of laying the first stone of the intended new bridge at Staines took place. At mat o'clock the Chairman, Sir W. Faesuinets, accompanied by the oilier was. hers of the Committee, arrived. sad every thing helig reedy for their recepden, descended into the caret-dam of the north abet tent, where ' assiged by Mr. linens, the architect to the under taking, the Chairman commenced the interesting ceremony by stating in a neat speech the object of the undenaklng, and the o;reat advantage it must prove of to the public. He then &peeked the coins of his present masury's reign, and covered the wbolle with a brass plate containing en appropriate inscription. The kit atria (being a beautiful block of granite, weighing three setw) wets than lowered into its place. and the whole concluded wilt *rot chews from the numerous and highly respectable amealleport.lll.legte who testified their entire approbation at the gratifying; eseimedop. HARRIED. The ?Ist of February, at Quilon, Lieut. It. It. difietiit. Majesty's 4th Led Dragoons, to Sally Maria, third ilanglitst et the late Christopher Biaaland, surgeon of Watdstrorth. • DIED. At Wallajabbad, Lieutenan t -Colonel J. Dalrymple, of his Ma. jetty's :30th Regiment. At Wallajabbad, Lieut.. Colonel Henry Wallace Sale, 9th Reit Madras Native Infantry. At Poona, Major John Snodgrass, 16th Itegt. Native Infantry. and first Assistant Commissary General. At OutacaMend, Madras, Major George Ogilvie, of the 176 Regiment Native Infantry. Wednesday at his seat, Ravensdale Park. county Louth, the Viscount Clermont. His Lordship succeeded Ms uncle, who wa► Ravi of Clermont, in the Barony and Viscounty, in Sept. 1806. — The Viscount dying without an heir, both titles become estinct. Suddenly, at &ding Hall, on the 24th inst. Augusta, wife a John Dick, Rag. Captain in the Royal Navy. NEWGATE mos I t RADENHALL MARKETS. Jura I% Beer— ...31 44 to 3s $d I Veal Ss 104 to 4s 44 Mutton .. a to 56 sd f Pork 04 is 4s 04 Lamb 51 04 to Ss 44 PRICES or HAY Mil) STRAW YESTERDAY. IT. salsas's. WINITOCIIAPEL. Hay 41 01 Od to 41 ISt Od Hay 31 15. to 41 IS. 04 Clover 3110. Od to 51 Os Od Clover 41 44 to 51 Os Si Straw 21 2. Od to 21 5s Od Straw 1114 a to 21 94 ed PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP kc. Town Tallow ... ... 40. Od I Yellow Soap ... ... 76$ Od Yellow Russia ... ... 59s 04 I Mottled .. . ... sts M White ditto .. ... —s Od I Curd .. . ... ... •••• OA Soap ditto ... ... —s 0d Graves ... ... „„ 16$ OA Melting Stuff ...... .. 52s Od Good Dregs .. ... 51 OS Tallow Imported from Sc .Petenburgh, 528 Casks. 1 ____ PRICE OF NEW POCKETS. Kent 921 to 122. I Kent Busse: Essen Farnham fine 1405 tot Old Duty ICIPS, Joss 29. 11111 M SAN. •M to 900 7lts to as 100 s to lOM —Seconds. 120 z t• 1401 at CSS,SOO. PRICE OF LEATHER. Best Dressing Hides _ Common Ditto Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for cutting Ditto 45 to 501bs 1514 to 174 Calf Skins, 36 to 401bs .. ...... Ditto 30 to 70Ibs Ditto 70 to Nibs ... .. Small Seals, Greenland) . ..... —... 90d t. $94 • Tanned Horse Hides .., ... .. lid to lad • Spanish Horse Hides .... ........... .. 29d to tid • Ships at Market. 55} Neweaule £8 Sunderland 1 GH- W ATKA at LONDON-BRIDGE I'Dmogioir. blonder 12 miaow after Afternoon 20 ice_ Aar haptM Loamy t Primed aid Publiubed by his 118vmajdia at the STAR Orrisa l lie. i, liatiwybies,Tamplald. .~ N. COAL MARKET, Jun M. • Skips Sold. 45i 24i Prier. 20 to to AS 0 , a to SO r- PRICESOF GOLD AND SILVER. Foreign Gold in Bars 1115 17 Silver, in Bars, standard ... 0 4pi I. .