Star. — London, England, 1829-03-18 00:00:00

°1144 L 1t4 - 0*15.4,7 S WAR-OFFICE, Masco 17. Ilmosaanotne.—The nodermentlowedOlicers upon half-pay bate been allowed to retire (ram the Service, and their half pay bus been cancelled from the 19th of March, Ift9, Inclusive, on receiving a commuted allowance for their commissions: Lientenants—.Higart Boyd, SamnelAugestus Perry. Ensigns— Elias Robison Handeeck, Thorn's Hiody Bishop, John Pr.nder. gad, 13eautoy Durant, Williams Turner Ryan, Rdward Clark. John Conyers, Jeremiah Campion, Francis Hey, Hutchinson Johnson. Cornet Seger Peny. OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, Masao 14. Corps of Royal Ensinsiers--Captain Samuel !tonally to be Lieu tenant-Colonel, vice Macleod. retired; Second Captain Samuel Camp% Me'halals to be Captain, vice Romitlr ; First Lieutenant Alexander Henderson to be Second Captain, vice Mslituish ; Second Lieuienant WUWta S Broogbton to be Fuse Lieutenant. vice Henderson. Commissions slimed by the Lord Lieutenant of Westmorland. Royal Westmorland Regiment of Militia—James Spedding, to be Major. Westmorland Yeomanry Cavalry—George Musgrave, Esq. to be Captain. CROWN-OFFICE, Moses 17. Members returned to serve in this present Parliament. City of Bath—The Earl of Breeknoek. • Borougb of Madbeenogb--Tbomas Henry Sutton Boeknall Raman, ling. in the room of lad Zane, via bar aceepsed the Chiltern Hundreds. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. , James Wlseeler end Willimn Jolla Adams, May's buildings, St. - blardretriane. irapere, BANKRUPTCIES ENLARGED. Samuel Pearson, Birsnitigkam, cabinet maker, from March 20 1 to April 5, at ele ven, at the Globe Tavern. Birmingham. John Bishop, Beck-sail Mill, Sheffield, Yorkshire. miller, from March 24, to April 21, at eleven, at the Crown Inn, Rotherham, Yorkshire. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. Thomas Smith, Manchester, publican. William George Rowley, Leeds, Yorkshire, hatter. BANKRUPTS. George Edwards, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, money scrivener, to serneader. March 91), at one, 97, at twelve, and April 25, at tea. at the Court of Commissioner* of Bankrupts, Basinghall street. Atturuies, Messrs. B. and J. Lawrence, Dean's-court, Doctors' Commons. John Shepley, Hayfield, Derbyshire, cotton manufacturer, March 31, April and Si, at two, at the York Hotel, Ma nchester. Attornies, Mum. Hurd and Co. Temple; or Mr. J. Booth, Manchester. . - George Frederkk Hamilton, Pratt-place, Camden fown, mer chant, March 20. at eleven, 31, at twelve, and April 111, at Alvan, at the Court of Commissioners of Bankrupts, Basinghall street. Anoiney, Ur. J. Silk, Goldwnitb-row, East liard- tog-street. George Valle, Mass Pond, Southwark, carpenter, March 21 31, and April 211 , at eleven. at the Court of Co mmissioners of Bankrupts. Besingitalbstrect. Misrules. Messrs. Sheffield and Sews. Great Prescott-street Goodman's &Ws. Joseph Phillips, Bristol, !W ilder, Much 30, 31, and April te. at eleven. at the Rummer Tavern, Bristol. Anoraks, Messrs. Parkas and Co. Bristol. John Coles Pope, Sable Bed Bens, malt factor. Match 19, at tw0,20, and April is, as twelve, at the Three Cups ban. 'Coldwater. Mtwara, Mr. I). Sewell, Halsted, Eases; or Messrs. Hall ad Co. Bakers' Hall. Peter Boon., Liverpool. livery stable keeper, March 30.31. and Aril IS. at tore. at the Clarendon Rooms LiverpouL Actor.- ' nles.lbessrs. Slade sod Co. Jolutosue‘t, iiedtortitow; or Mr. T. Fusser, Liverpool. James Regimen, Potter Sneer Harlow, Rotes, cattle jobber, March 24 at one 31, at twhe and April Yu . at. one, at the Court of Commi:timsen of Bank rupts, lissingball-atrter. Actor Dry. Mr. C. 11 Teague, Cannon-street.. John Miller, Pall mall. bookseller, March 20 27. and April 21, - at Dia!, at the Court of Commissioners of Bankrupts, Bas nglialla street. Attorney, Mr. G. & Ford, Pall-mall. Thomas Tonikinion, Park-lane, Leek, Staffordshire, tanner, April 1, at two, st. at one, and 1111, at two, at the Red Lima lisna.sek- Atturnies, Messrs. Atilington and Co. Bedford row; or Mesas*. Killmister and Co. Leek. • Themes Baker, 13. th, innkeeper. March 26, c 7, and April t.'S, at ten. at the White Lion Ina, Bath. Attornks, Mr. W. Jones, Crosby•square, Bishopsgate street; or Mr. Belling*, Both. • IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS. MARCH 17. The Earl of SH A FTE.SBURY presented a Petition from a parish in the county of Stirling against granting further COUCCSNUDS to the Roman Catholica—Laid on the table. The Earl of TA NKEKV I LLE presented a Petition in favour of the Catholic Claims from Wallingford —Laid on the table. The Marquis of ANGLESEY presented Petitions to the same effect from the Protestants of St. Catherine, in the city of Dublin ; from the Protestant Dissenters of litirton.uPon•Trent, and fr ant: e place In York ; and for unqualified emancipation- from the Boman Catholic inhabitants of about eighteen parishes in the counties of Cavan, Tipperary, Dublin, Westmeath, Cork, Alvah, and Ca vanagh.. The Noble Marquis also presented three 1 1 161111411111 for the repeal of the Vestry and- dub-teams Acta, from parishes in the county of Cork. 'fbe Archbishop of A 111 MAGII, after seveial obeervatiunsoold that Ms own name was Aged to the Petition be should have the honour to present, and therefore be nerd not add that he ensite.ly ea/culled in its prayer. lie should nut trouble their Lordships with any observations as to the coutents.nt the Petition, but be trusted he might he permitted to say a few words as to the charac ter of the persons who subscribed it. lie saw appended to it the names of many persons who deservedly stood high in their sacred procession; and whnm be knew to be actusted m Ow course 'levy took by no &thugs which Were inconsistent with Christian chanty. They had been impelled to ibis course after much , observation of . . what Pura . ) , in Ireland was. and they entreated i rig Lordships .to Deluge they repeal.) thine laws, which were, in their till. niaiion, esientialle the preset v.ition of civil and ',Woos 'Welty in that country. Hi. Grace eh:a pistil:ed pcitions against any ter- Sher Concessiut, to the Hannan Catholics, from the Archhlakur and Clergy of the novince of Armagh, in li timbal; from the llirMr and Clergy of a Diocew in Helatio; Irons the Dean and Chapter Hof St. Patrick's. Dublin. The Duke of ATHOL'. presented a Petition foe the removal of Catholic Dimbildies, from a Synod in Perthshire. The Karl of HA It EWOOD presented Petitions against farther concessions to the Roman Catholics from Great and Littk Askop, from Bickerton, Clifton, Doncaster, Crockmanfork, Abbackwkk, Acton, Alarstou, Sutton, ohipton, and Downhale. The Noble Eat, said he bad one other Petition to present, and in offering it so the notice of their Lordships, he would avail himself ut the up• portooky very briefly to state what he thought of the measures proposed by his Majesty's Blinisters. Ever knee the Catlinlic Question. bad been proposed in Parliament, he was of °piston that it was Debbie lit nor proper to grant the Roman Catholics that which they required ; atid, it was tot this reason he now felt desi rous of saying hat that opinion continued to the present uochanged. 3f be did nut consider the subject in the light he before viewed it, be svotill feel himself fully jukified to act upon the measure ; but what was that measure? ,It would be found that the Bill intro diked for the purpose of confetring political power upon the Rts. man 'Catholics alto interfered with the religion -of the,Roman C r y.' tbolies, and that h also went to the client ut expeitiogoot of thigh . principal panics from the kingdom. These remelts, he. thought, mete sulEciwit to cause him to withhold his support to the measure. He did respect the present Government, and be was sorry that any thing should compel him to differ irons thenit but. that respect would never suffer him to go to the titan of giving up what be cooddered to be the best and only security to the Constitution-- pleas, hear).—Ordered to lie on the table. Tue Kisil of FARNHAM hoped be might he permitted to traipses a few moments upon diet: Lordships while be made sonic observations I. reference to one pasticola, Petition which be bad 40 present to the House. That petition was sll= by . gb" WO" mews audtbe principal persons residing id ow, besides se -Breral Professors belonging to the University. Ever di:cells Ida. .duty's Speech from the Throne, reconistiendins - to Parliament the :4 0 bddszation of Catholic Essasciratioa, disk opinion bad been. -.11 " Ike Venting of these ,Coneeesione woad be a direct Moleskin of the Tte•ty of Wiwi with Scotism' and &gland, which war :thri is the fei g n of Qom* Apar. It that opinion was epos truth, be would have their Lordships madder well '"" 16 e1 tusk* Into the spirit of • that contra*. Whether their •billern was letroded open fact he Weald not at ante undertake le Vest - had 'given to the subject, he bad no William was made an integral part of Mt Adt of Medd between this country and Scotland. If, then, that elljsoless founded upon fact, let their Lordships me we ll the OS which that measure might lead. AU who were = el :rills Stench his knew weU that . there were no persona who al their rights and privileges mare then the people of flatland. • knew. how that country was convulsed when episcopacy was 81. 4 tempted to be forced upon it; and if the country was convulsed at an attempt to interfere with its Church privileges. bow much mute might be expected when Popery was attempted to be forced upon them—and mote especially if that was in direct opposition to the articles of the Treaty of Union, and that national compact which they would naturally meet should be kept inviolate?—(Hear). At the request of the Noble Lord the petition was read at length. The Bad of ROSEBERY pledged himself to prove, when the proper time arrived, that the measure was not contrary to the fun. damental ankles of the Union with Scotland. Lord FARNHAM presented a similar Petition from the Se. eedered. Armagh, signed by 4.400 persons; a more loyal clue of -subjects did ma t be believed, exist in his Majesty's dominioiss..... if. also presented petitions to the same 'feet front the Protestants of Abort. hi the catty of Armagh; the Protestant Dissenten of Pitchaus, in the county of Gloucester; the Protestant Dissenters:of Mulbetry.gardens, /Weide-highway ; the Presbyterians of Mans gatet's Hall. Armagh:, of Newton Stewart, and the Protestant Dissenters of Weethery. Gloucester; and of Lady Hosebeedmile Chapel. in the city of Worcester. Lord SEA FORT) presented a Petition front Hastings in fame of the Roman Cethelka—Orilered to lie on the table. The Earl of SHEFFIELD presented Petitions EOM din Roman Catholic Claims from several parishes in Sumas • fads Bux.tead, Dean, &owenany, and from parish in Essex ' — Ordered to lie on the table. The Duke of RICHMOND presented a similar Petition from %Vesthansueath.—Ordered to lie ou the table. The Marquis of SLIGO presented a Petition in favour of the Catholic Clams from a parish in the county of kleatb.—Ordered to be op tbi table. The Earl of ELDON presented a Petition agalist granting fur ther concessions to the Roman Catholics, signed by 94 Protestant Dissenting Milliners residing in Lan don and Westminster; also similar Petitions from Varleigh, in Northampton ; from a parish lu Shoreditek r from Mortal; St. Ninniaus, in the courity of Stirling: Moyle, iu Cumberland ; from parishes in Perthshire, Stirliog, sad several over places in Scotland; from Haddington ; Newmonkland ; from several parishes in Sows and Essex ; from a parish in Noeth-' aniptoo ; from Loosdale, In Westmorland, signed by 3,000 persons; from a parish in the East Riding of Yqrk ; and from several parishes hi she county of Down. The Noble Earl said he bad four otherPeti lions, eery numerously signed, which be would present when the Noble Earl (Grey) was in the House. The Marquis of LON DONDEIIILY presented a Petition pray ing for Emaocipition from a parish in the county of Auttim. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY moved fur a Return of the number of Freeholders registered in each county in Ireland, distin guiskiug the 40s. SOL cud 50/lifedilielders.—Agreed to. Tiro Marquis of THOM ON DefaMented Petitions from the Pro testant inhabitant* of lialiadylsob add Clonakilty, against granting farther concessions to Ike Rama Catholics.---Ord. to lie on the table. The Bishop of CHIBITER said. he bad a Petition to present front the Clergy of t►e time of Livetpool against grauting further coueerisiens to the Roman Catholics. He thought the petitlest should be received with satisfaction by the Noble Lords, becalnw it showyd that all the Clef. of the Established Church wore not so inaccessible to reasuo as some had thought. In the prayer of that petition he fully cuocurred. He hoped, however, that U the Minim Catholics were admitted to political puyeet. an oath would be imposed upon them that might affurd some security to the Pro tenaut establishment; •tai he furthen hoped *AI they would be hound out to use their influence that such oaths might be t4uprut4d will/b.—The petition was then read, and ordered to be said Lipton Ike table. The Bishop of LLA NDA FF presented a Petition item arty three Clergymen in Monmouthshire against granting farther Celia .cesations to the Roman Catholics The Right Reverend Prelate. stated, that be felt happy in presenting the Petition, because Its language was mild and moderate, and betrayed nothing lice tali., 'haus aninawhy of intemperance; and be felt honoured by the trust that had been confided to him by the petitioners, because he him self did DOI 011iertaill with tears as the petitioners appeared to era tenaln et the measure introduced by his Majesty* Midden. 1* petition. es merely lasplured, as he alsia did, though not %perhaps with the same mea g. that the 601/ailment Witold preserve so- violate the Protestant Cuustitution—(llear, bear). The petits's° was laid upon the table. The Harlot H A RHO WBY presented a Petition from a parish lu Stallortlshier, pra)ius fur the removal of Roman Cathode dis abilitieit.—Laid on the table. The Duke of DEVONSHIRE presented a Petition to the ante effect trusts Watts turd, and another frons.the Ptutestant thstenters orChestertteld.-I.did en the table. ' Ertl FITZ WlLLiatApreeented similar Petitions from several parishes iu Wicklow.—Lind on the table: On the mull ii of the Duke of WELLINGTON the House resolved itself into a Committee upon the Army Mutiny bill. Inc Bill was replied with one amendment, and the Report ordered to be received on Thursday. The House then adjourned till Thursday. ~ • HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Stnefgers' Gallery. was opened at one o clock, and Janie* 4141Cil lilliyl with atiottirs. The smother of Members in at. tendauce it four. o'clock was unusually large. The backs of the benches Were covered with papers bearing the names of Members desirous of pro-mpg* seats. Toe &microluseqg taken the Chair. Mr. Mentraoat teeK'the oaths and his seat fur the borough of Marlborough. • ' 1 . .. • Lard' NUGENAtto ptr,s:nting a Petition from certain iuh tants of Aylestsery-in bilious of Contest/or to the Catholics, took Occasion to refer to what. he considered some unbar practices of the Anti-Catholic *wapiti Aylesbury.. Ap as iusiance of the vio lent religious teelingicluplayed by that party, the Noble Lord men tioned toe circuatetaiteeloi to certain duo-Carbolic Clergyman of 4 that towu having throat a ted-heit peter through . ' com mentary on the scripture,. that had beets lett at his dour by some Wreityan Methodists. Attsr a few cross (rum Mr. PORTMAN, deprecating any dia. caesium on the aohjert, Lard NUGENTprmented a Prtifien front Roman Catholics sal Adatoo.soder•Lyue praying a removal of disabilities; sod two others Irons 141.11011 aim &tester in favour of Coacession. Alr. ft. h Itti presented Petitions from Newport Pagneil, Veney Stratford, and Minty, in favour of Emancipation. The Merges+ nt CHANDOS repeated his assertiou of a former night, that the majority of the breehnidereof Aylesbury were ado r verse to any further Cuncessaion to the Rumen Catholics. Alt. It. thought the Freeholders of Aylesbury were.' equally divided in their opinions on the Catholic Question. Mr. LEN N Alit) presented a Petition from Malden in (scout of Concession to the Catholics. He.coneldered that the majority of the county of Essig were not adverse to Concession. Sir E. HARVEY contended that the majority of the county were hostile to the removal of the restrictions imposed en the ltontao .C4l holies. Mr. DICK was of opinion that the majority of the inhabitants:, of.Maision were adverse to.Cuoceesioe. The former Petition from that town against Emancipation was signed by Inure than 3UO persons, while the present had only 100 signatures. Mr. WESTRRN thought the majority of the people of Estes were willieg to Wave the question to the wisdom of the Legislature.. Mr. KEA& presented a Petition hunt the protestant Lhuenters of kiknchatn t in : the county of hum, praying that no further Concessions sheik' be granted to the &MUM Catholics. Lord MANDEVILLE presented a Petitioo from the Proem. cant Dimming Ministers tif Loudon against the Catholic Mr. W. SMIT k ottiall that the Dissenting Ministers of Loudon were ageless, the Citholie Claims. They must be Wes leyea, or Calrunatic-Dhisenters, who signed the Petition presented by the Noble Lor4. Mr. THANT Maw that the majority of all Dissenting Sects, except Unitarians, wore opposed to the Catholic Claims. That .ntioicous son, the Ualtarians were exercising their irdissence in preventing Poetises (tom boils presented against that question. Mi. PORTMAN brought in a Bill to amend the law respecting the Friendly Societies. Mr. MOUILK. In presenting a Petition against the Catholic Claims, signed by 147,000 Yrotestants residing in Ireland, did nut mat* so much importance to the number of signatures, u to the character if the Pctirioaers, among whom Wu to be found a great number of the resident Nobility, Magistrates, and substantial Leadhelleni awn who, from their local knowledge, were very moth's of giving is the House concise informatioe respecuag the dispekhiso et the Catheliee. .Ihe Petkiesers came forward to ea. , by ---.ran the Roman Catholiet—for in all acts and inter. Own between them and the Petitioners, the latter in no Instance Manifested any distinction un account of religinist opinions. The • 'Petitions expressed their SCOW of thf dangsr towhich the Consti Sodom *NW be exposed by any act that ails' give any addltioa 1 polish:al loluenee' to the Catholics*, whit were gl wiry ambitious and aspislo body, and who acted under th e o r is! wad , Infisteine of their h o od. C ou ld any man ((abler** the lion. Member) lconduct who ha unsidered the of the •Citbnliet of ht. years, pirt doubt for a monieut that the aggrandisement of their own Church, sod the destruction of the Protestant Church. was not their ul tame ohject? Could the Catholic* feel cement with it•MtillOnt Which they were told would prove a support to the Protestant Es tablishment, and operate as a check to Popery? The C.tholic+ of keland were given to uthiesstand that Emauctpatioa would hr fol. tiered by an abolition of the tithes and the Church-rates. Under *itch circumstances, bow could they feel satisfied esti) this mea nie*, which, as it was contended by Hon. Members, would have a:nontrary tendency ? The succ e ss of this measure would be fol. by insolence on the part of th e C.tholi cs ; i t w ou ld brin g actionthe worst passiom, and in the South of Ireland the Protestants would have .nsuth to fear. The lion. V, .miser had Owns reason to feat that. if this measure were carried, an exten t*, emignnion of Protestant tamilies would he th, eon-equenee, lie doe re part would be depressed and disheartened—the 'arch It t would lose its hest stlyrlft, and the state of . wankliwinialysed. Who could• calculate as the direful thokalidabt result from it ? .It there was a Protestant Dm hmuited * brelasil. they elledd heeeapiorree lel strimeth. eetry them through any diSculsiee that they aheuld be ...- ts. i . SPRING R ICE lidded that the Petitions 'contained the isednurans of the Protestants of Irelaul ; he would **eft, with. not fair of contradictlm, that the bulk of Irish Protestant pro— peaty was in favour of Cathode Emancipation . and he was rune that many who had signed the Petition, if they bad now an oppui lenity, wisethi sign one of a contrary nature. Did no: the wese of representation of Ireland show that the great body of the people were in favour oft 011Ce60011? Out of the one boodred Members, may sixteen bad voted with the Hon. Member Liao had presented the Petition, and 'even out of these repreiented Wrought. HE IMr. Spring Ride) would say, that the *Protestants would reap more benefit trim the success of this measure than the Catholics g instead of Catholic Emancipation. It should be emitted ,Pristeetant Emancipation. What alternative did the Huth Member offer for this measure? Ile was aware that massy Gentlemen in Ireland met in secret, and meditated an alternative which lie could not mention without horror—he meant civil war. 'I he Hots Member, came here to tell Englishmen that they had 10J,100 Irishmen to support them ; but if be was among those Irishmen he would hear them say tb.st they expected 100,000 linglishmati to support them—for so the predecessor orthe lion. Member (Mr. Elba) had stated at a public meeting. Mr. li. GRATTAN asked the Ilusaisurahle Member for Dublin U there were the signatures of 70 Peers attached to that Pal t i ? He knew there were not. He ( Mr. 11. Grattan.) kuew that paupers and belielyeats had sighed ihat Petition. It wa • got up solely by lasi Ikwaseriek Clubs, who found fault with the Catholic Astoria dueler wilassika rent, yet tin y ciellecel rent themselves. They litenspil thainal tteasomble conduct—yet their own conduct was wore treasonable. The Hun. Membir here -read several extracts of *orbs* sosde at tits meetings of the Bruoserick Clubs in Ireland, and concluded by observing( that the majority of the Irish Pro sodist fiesnry woo in favourof Emancipatiou. lard F. la GOWER acquiesced in the tribute of loyalty paid to the petitioners by the Humunable Member for Dtinhu. Nut he denied the petitsim spoke the litlftllTlCllia of the Protestants Of Ireland.. That petitinu was coeval wit. the origin of lirunswick Clubs.. It was directed poseipAny against an Assucialion which was no lamer iti existence, am, did not imply that all who signed, it were oppesei to the ineaute resonate...tided to the Throe*. 'This might be *bared frau the coutli.ct of the Linwrich &tins.. •wkk Club, who gut up a petition aphid the Ca ionic Claims be hie the meeting of Parliament ; tut when the Speech Irmo the Throne traelord Ireland, many who had previously agfred to the petition &WOW mango,/ at, aslegiug that tla it freAng• were rot Asti-Catholic, but their object heitig to protect Ott Protestant E 4.• Inbelhowor. they thought it would be sufficicutly secure by the Inemere which. Goiter ii Mein 4.nposed,tu totethilatte. _ _ . Thu petition was 'then brugg,t up, and attro a kw words from ataintwal iivait t o . pd Caksual ktucterutta, It was road assil tedareat to be printrd. • Matiaa most ma-atsabal A Message was brought from the Lords to state that their Lord ships istiogreed t• the hachequ. r Bias Hilt, for blame Mutiny Bill, the tit. Melts U.U. Anti the katoiturgli Cies Bill. . . . M.. 11H44./.1.16H la. said, Ise-had a Vet:Min to pie -seat against further Cohceisious to the R man CAW lies, a l ai he mimed was opposed to rotate* concessions, because Roman Catholics owel Allegiance to a foreign power,.whi .. ch he considered advetse to the intetsts of a Protestant State.. Whin an attempt vas made to OVel mow the bulwarks of l'aotrttattosin any man should be considered a rccreant ss h o neglected. to come for ward feailessly pii.l Avow. his 01•Iniuns.—Toe petition, from a parish in Nottingham, was theta hiutight - up and laid upon t e table. Admit!' EVANS presented several petitions feom parishes in the county of Col k against toothier conces sion, to the Woman Catholics; AM..i.g•t t can petitions itorn Clonakilty, Ballyduti, and :Ault. lice Gallant (hiker, in laying th e se hetme the House, .and., that the tutnibars of the Legit'. turn setae b Uii.l not only to consider its effects here but !fried es, T. ear was all aAhmber a' that House who aaa,,aat ',Aril • balms' oath that the faith 4 4 it e Roman Catitolic was, isioltha truus; and he called on it;. m, as Cii titans, to re member the d nunciatio ns prontou.tced in Sctiptuie ' upon those who identified tneinselses with idolaters. rhe. Merti. ers of that flutist, on . Wong the oaths at the table, same that no lottigii Plume. Poten tate, tat p..wer had or ought to have any dominion, spits:nal or temporal, within these realms. Roman Cettiolics were known to bold opposite tenets, and were piepated to promote that power and dominion. How. then, was it Consi.tei4 with the solemn oaths of the Members of that House to consent torneadmission of persons of that character to a pie ticipation of political poeei ? For Imperil, as one smiivislual, he had resolved that DO Algtline.tt of necessity or elpedlence should ever come between him and has Gun He would abide by the oath he had taken in the presence of " him tt whom all hearts ale open, all desires know', and fium , whom no secrete are taid. " —The several Pe.ltleolif were then I:nought up and. (ordered to be printed. Mr..BURRELL pie.ented a similar petition (tom; in Sussex. Sir IL INGLIS said he had several Petitions to present. None of them were cast is a• Co Martin mould. These Petitions expressed the unprompted opinion of the petitioners, and were all opposed to Catholic Emancipation. The Gist was from the Archdeaconry of Bab, aipned by 57 Clergymen. • Here the Hon Member read a ON of the Petitions, 41 in number: they came from various stele. bodies in Sfotland and England and [rum different parishes. With respect to Scotland, no doubt, he believed, could be eater. seined that the majority of the peop le there were opposed to Con. cesaion. This would be.furtber proved by a Partial which he Embuld soon present front the Inhabitants of Edinburgh. The ap peal of the Church of Scotland deserves the greater attention, as it had no representatives either in that or the other House of Perlis,. seem. •In one of these Petitions, that from the Vicar and Curate of Ic.nereshoroogb, the petitioners prayed the attention of Parliament to tbcCollege of hlaynootb. He should tale's future opportunity of calling the attention of the House to this subject. It appeared must extraordinary that England should be taxed fur the support of an establishment in which doctrines were taught which Protestants believed to be idolatrous.and damnable. With respect to the Ms. Maters from the Church of England, front the vast number of ,mitions presented by them, little doubt . could remain that the ma fty of that body were oppOsed to concession. ' The Padden having been read, and the question put that they be printed, bit. N. CALVERT said he must deny that the Amer of the, l majority of the population orlineland and smtland was opposed ml The majority, he felt coalldent, were disposed to " PRICS SKY ENPENCE. irfir the matter to Parliament. The number of Petitions prsirt-il nothing. there was net a village in his distt let in which he could Dot have a peritloo got up, which way he pleased, fur or against it. Lord J. RUSSELL said the Alerting which lately took place in Edinburgh. comprebeedios all in that city distinguished Inv rank, wealth, awl talent, proved that his lion. Hens! (Sir It. Inglis) was mistaken is supposing that a majority‘f the people of Scotland wore opposed to Emancipation. lk. Chalmers it livered a speech upon this occas no in I of Emancipation, which was a most silk specimen ut argument and eloquence, and in which br tossed Ids convie:too that the great hotly of the peal.'. were quiesZent.at.;l disposed to leave the matter to the wisdom of the Leg s t .re.— With respect to the Protestant Dissenters of Faigloisi, be briars fiat a majority of them were desirous to we the questiou aettle.i.— Taw petitions werefidered to he minted. sir. W said be was Instructed, in the ab. mace of the Hon. Mettilier for Stallfixd, to meson two Pe khan against any further CaIICISSIOIII to the Catholics. He regretted 'this circumstance, as be could nut support the prayer ul the abated retrain train saying wore un the subject till the question was regularly betas the House. rtie Pt:rhinos. Isla (It were from Tetbury and souther place in Shifford-latre, w , rc ribs's. read. Admiral HARVEY prevented several Petition% again.t Cat. Legatees, which. after a few wurds tram Mr. Itituwmusw, were brought up and re.d. . . ' alt. BELL presented a Petition from Newcastle upon-Tyne against any fertile, Concessive% to the CA holies. Mr. EI.LISON preseata4 • Penton from the Mayor and Cor poration Nsweawk arau Tyne, in savour ut Catbuise Ematic.pa tem. lie Ikrouotealle Newby, saU the Ktoutto agreed to with astir one di.sentieot voice. Culled S It ITI'T pretented a l'attition front a pariah In P.isrt, io favour ut limeucipatieu. Mr. DENISON !untitled a similar Petiiitou frum the town and putt of Ilanings. Karl BE(' IVE presented several Petitions Crum the cutinty of Ale.ah, of& similar *haute. ivlr. F. PALMER presented a Petition in favour of Conersaion, from the inhabitants of Alford. lierks. Mr. WESTERN presented two Petitions of a similar nature, from Saffism Walden and Cogge6hall. Er4e2. Mr. H. GRAITA N presented is Petition. from Tipperary, Antrim, Cross Patrick, Dublin, Galway, and various srber piece., in favour ut Catholic Emancipation. Mr. HUSK ISSON said, be held in his hand the first and only Petition from the wealthy and populous town of Liverpool —it w. o in favour of Conceskon, and signed by numerous re.pectahle per sons who were fully competent to take a correct v.ew of the rest question; seventeen out of lofty of the Clergymen of the K.ta. !dished Church bad signed it. These was a strung feeling in Loser. pool favourable to the Cohstitution--mither WWI, intention, nor desire was etiteitain.d fur a champ that might tend to weaken tlio State; but Liverpool, &loud mint c 015.,. places, knew what sumo sures were best for pacifying behind. (;enteral ASCU IN E pledged himself that if the whole town of Liverpool was cuivassed, two third* of its inhabitants would be found hostile to the Bill. The merchants and oakr re pect.blo inhabitants were nearly divided on the Quvition ; hot amotipt the great mass of the population there was no proportion between they that were against the med,ure and those that were for it. lie (General Gascoyne) was convinced that the writ of the Petkios would be found not to be entirely fur die granting of Eausicipation. Mr. Ilusg ISSON•rost and r e ad th e p r ay e r o f t he Fetatiou,th convince the lion. Menthes* that the petition be bad presentetl was featly in favour of concession ; he also read the lett( r which accom panied the petition, in cotroburatiun. , Ur. HUSELSSON pit-sewed Petitions from Birr, in Tipperary, mad three other places, in favour 01 concession. • Colonel BARNARD presented a similar Petition front Burr) Kings Comity, Warfel l I N USA Y presented a similar Petition, slgiird by 2,000 lattabiratits of Wigan. Sir 11. SMITH, in presenting two Petitions again.t F.n.anart. eion front parishes in Kent and Enka, observed. that it toe BIL pas.cd, at would be dechledly *against fhe wishes of the pewit-. Mr. BLOUSON presented a counter Petitions brunt the tants of Wigan. Mr. AU tCROM BIE presented two Petitions ii favour ut Concession from the city of Waterford and the sown of Cue,trs held. Lord all) U NTCH Alf Lit.% presented -a 'Millar Petition t, u* the inhabitants of Etinishower. Loa ULAN DFURD preiented a Petition against °nicest:tat from Cb. mestield. SPOTTISWOODE presented a Natio° to the bilMe area mow Sait.sla. CATHOLIC It LW If BILL Mr. &tretary PEEL moved !he Order of the Lio/ for the "- Bond re.ding ut the koalas Catholic Relief Bill. Mr. BENSON WAS de 41 Ota to • 11 . r A few re•r.s Its upon the.:ultj..cl now before the House, and I o, ed for wire indulgence, inasmuch as he had not yet tee passed upon their attention during any of the vati.nas di cos• sums that bad taken place upon petitions. It was riot bis intention to tray.l over the id that l al been 60 ably trodden by many prolessio:.al Gentlemen ; slit not man to carry back hi• view. so far :he Revolts. non of 1688. Those trines mere, he observed. very eventful, and had tendered gr. at and deciiive acts 41). 'solute!) , necessary. But it was now the duty of Par ;i4l• meat and of the country to lo:k, not to :he year 1688. bur to the year 1829; AA the clue two 'eget(' pi{ Cll. thole: • Eroansioation wr.uld ti en resolse it•ell i to a ve r y narrow comp tA. It a ould then soni.ty beconie a question as to whether we Mere to have recou•se to 'conce•si n, us to chase the ba otd and 1. •ve recou -e to coercive trreA•ures ? lie had unlialipi:y aiure.seJ rte Irish rebellion of 1798, and his nature rec..i e 1 fions the iec..liection of the Lantos-, v hick then existed in that country, when the Catholic fought against 1' e Proles-- taut, and the Prosestant Against the Carbolic, as d w-est b th were exposed to a foreign force that had b.en in troduced into that convulsed land. He telt assuieJ that no individual,.whatever might be his opinion o • this subject, would desire that such a scene of ho. ror sh u again occur. He had always been persuaded rh tat. en this question should be brought forward with any Pope of success, it must he by the Goverornieen of th. c en try ; by a Isom it must be dealt flit a ith a liberal hand, or be ineffectual. !Wad been stated as an obj..cite:ii to this Bill that no securities were off:tekt ; and pi haps there were not such securities as some 11 0 110Ulab e Gen. ilemen would desire. 11.. t lie Mould att, wri.y •ecuti• ties could there be ? He had had much inteicuurse with marry Catlio:sc families, and he believed that such Gentlemen as were likely to be elect:d as Meusbers t f that House w .uld be not only men of wealth, but men education and of honour. To the oaths of such wen he looked for security to theConstitut ion of these realms; and he also expected that, if this' Bill were passed, and peace restored to Ireland, the Irish Gendernen would M induced to reside on their estates, and the country taus become prosperous Ind happy. He I.oped, when the measure did pass..it would be passed by an unanis mous voice, and Le received with gratitude. Sir E. KNATCHBULL said—l desire, at the ear. Nast I.eriod in my power, ttPttate 'to the House s as briefly as possible, the reasons tit:what're compelled me 10*pr:rise the further progress of themeasure now be- lose the House. lam anxious of taking a pie very fi rlit -7 opporiunityof delivering my sentiments, be:arise when " tbe Right Honourable Secretary introduced i r e present mature to the House, I seas prevented by indispasitiiii Walt offering my . opinions with reference to tr. '••I am even now labouring under the same inconven enee,'and shalltberefore feel it necessary to detain the Haute but for a short period. It upon this occasion 1 we e in fluenced-by personal considerations, 1 sbou.d Lciw be ordie.offence wbicb bas beenlecently aharsed• aril= ose, and content myself with tieing a strut vote but lay iprikw ukpublicifett yis paramtunC 'to • • 44'. ... • \ • • . • ik , - . • • % -.> .• • . .ZiPl i .. . 4 , r.... 7 • ° C s l ' 'lJit . • ( b) S . . ...% V . C *S P i t ztr. . ... VII 4 grIP . • 0 • -'" .. , NUMBER 13,120.] WEDNESDAY EV LNG, MARCH 18, 1829. ......---...- 'FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE, M A 17. to lay ; bat front the great atteneton which ►he (Lord Farnham)! orbsbart tralberately formed, and influene Al by no hostile % Ira;ir th I had subject, given to 'hi he bad nu doubt that the Act oil fading towards the Roman Catbollco—•for in all acts and inter. I ndltbing