Star. — London, England, 1829-04-01 00:00:00

ir 400 • • 4 • " IP" . • read a iticood time on the 17th April, by which a &et 14titie.anteml *ifs allowed. if he und erstood ari g ht, their uotthlfiiir • Lad been told not to discuss the Bill on the Pre , eatAffun of petitions; and therefore the only dismission:a% hick could take place upon the general pt inciple of the Bill was on the motion for its second ted'lhat reading. Al' le said before. he now reratt-- he should vote against it with considerable reluctance. Ile was reluctant to oppose the Noble Duke, but, be- CAW be felt it a duty be owed to his country, no sacri fice. would induce bin! to shrink from the task, however ofigtatiful. What weedd the country be likely to say at the hasty measure?-Was it not likely to be the source bf genet al dissatisfaction ? Would not the public be led-to ask why they were so eager to pass it, and that before , they bad well considered it? Who could think that forty-eight hours was a sufficient time to weigh the principle of that Bill ? He was going to call it a Bill of Indemnity, and so it really would appear to be. The, short time allowed for its consideration made it look more like a private Turnpike Bill than one of such public importance. He should therefore propose that Monday biotic day for the second reading of the Bill, instead of Thursday. The difference in time would, after all, be verb Short ; it would be only the going into Committee bn Tuisday ins sad of Monday. for if the Bill were read a second time on Thursday it could not be committed before Monday; whereas, in case it should pass the second vetting on Monday, it might go through the form of committal on the Tuesday following ; and even thin the interval between its first and second reading Would be only three Parliamentary days, Wednesday, Thursday, and Faiday. He should much rather that their Lordships would consent to this than to see the Bill hurried forward in the manner in which it was pro posed to be; and. therefore, he a ould move that the day appointed for the second 'ceding of the Bill be Monday orstead of Thursday. LOW 'HOLLAND said hecoeld not consent to the Motion male by the Noble Earl who . had just addressed the it 'use. Tne principle of the present Bill had been owlet' the consideration of the public, nut only ever since the commencement of the present Session of Par liament, but long before; and, since the meeting bf Parliament and the Speech delivered from the throne, rt was known what the nature of that Bill would be ; he for one could not acquiesce in the argument urged by the Noble Lord who fist addressed the House. that the measure was one which coed not be warranted by atiy preceded. He thought that, from the great knots ledge which that Noble Lord had • f all Parlia mentary Acts, be would have slaved isro a detail of those particular Acts which were passed under the same auspices as those in which the Foment Bill appeased be . fore them. (The N 'ble Lord here entered into a detail of Bilk pasted within a very short time after their fist introduction into that House.) He was surprised that the Noble Losd.should have confin , d himself to Acts passed since the sear 1819. He could it.statice the Habeas Corps) Suspension Act. which passed in three days after its being first brought into the House. It hi., bre r twitted that the country was taken by sin pike. Ile strongly denied the charge. He, for one, was not at all surprised that the Noble Duke had adopted the course which his wisdom pointed out to him as necessary. He would further pet it to the sense of th House, wltetltet Patlianient or the country was takett by sot pris ? Could Noble Lore's have thought that the S:ssiiin would have passed without the Mei. sore, in some shape to other, being brought before Par -1 amens ? Ile tioiroli el the idea of the proai c le . f the Bill not h ving been well considered. lf really the Noble L bids had bad only a few days to consider at he would, out of contteiy to them,' have iuppinti..t i MO* lion tot outdo.; off the second leading until a later pe, rind. But Noble [dealt bad not o aited lilt then to consider the principle of the BM, which for thirty years had been the almost constant subject of debate in that and the other !loose of Pal liametst. and which had been considered over and over, he was going to use a hypes b le. and say f rim time immemorial—(Hear). The Eall of MALMESBURY decocted that it was not from any personal consideration he had made his motion for delaying the second leading of the Bill; but, as he had betore said, he thought the dignity of their Lordships Hone denaauded it; for he maintained that, since the posing of the Ball of Rights, there never was a measure of equal importance to that DOW before the House. In all his Parliamentary experience be was ignorant of any Bill. until the present, having been bellied tholugh dr- House in the manner in which this was likely to be, and between the first and second read ing of which so abort an interval was allowed to tran spire. He hoprd their Lordships would consider that they .were now about an act of the Legislature of a sta tism the emit impottatits The Nolie Baton bad referred to good old times to produce a precedent. He could fit t agree with him that the Acts quoted by that Noble 1341011 did affo d any precedent. Emergency required th it they should have been so passed ; but .in the pre sent case these was sot pressing emergency. The NuOle Earl condoled by saying he should persist in his mo iio s that the Bid be read a second time on Monday, in tead of Thursday. Lord. esODEItICH could not acquiesce in the motion Made by ihe Noble Eml. nor could he agree with him in thinking that sufficient time had not been granted to the public and to Parliament for the consideration of the principle of the Bill. lie would ask that had hey been about lot the last ton months? He would venture to say that there was not an ind.vidual Peer in the H- use who bad teat availed himself of at least oneoppottunity of them 1 f mole than one—to esti' ess his opi _ noon upon the measure. The question bad been under discussion altoost every evening since the commenter trent cf the Session, and he ; believed the result of those discussions was. that the minds of many persons. • . at well of those who were as of those who were not Members of that House, were influenced to view the question in a light in which they bad not sera it belose—(Hear) His N ably Friend founded hirprancipal ejection to the Bill chiefly tio the great mass os peti tifto that had been presented against it. He (Lore Gsidirieh) valued the right of petitioning. and he was ready to grant his Nobble Friend that nu sabers of pets tiout'had been presented against the measure; but tha t tie must say, that in getting up petitions recourse Was had Mean, which he hesitated not to pronounce as mo s t disreputable to the country; and alien be con aideied the gr".tis blunders in history on which one half as'r the o is *Me founded, and more especially the, gross nusie'printations made by those who were op. 0143 to the measure—the calumnies that had been resorted to—the attempts. th .t bad leen made to repre sent all those w;th whom the measure originated as con spiring Co overthrow the Consti.ution, and consigning them .h ittfausy here if not to destruction betealtes— ripfeientitig them as atheists and latitudinarians—to eote, - i..g auto' a dap' laid plot to destroy ni;t only the Citi'vii.ution but religiois of the counts y— he cc, tainly coin's .ttot .vie petitions that' had bent; got up by such tsi'4.'ls witL that importance whiCh would othei wise at t-ids'ekseit to them. He frit Womb bouud to say. that the, Lost tailluatiaable and dills c means bad been se.' bia i , ' sorted to by individuals. Shame on some of their co adjutors. who, while they made those representations. blew them to be false ! Ifs then, they had been field up to theit fellisar countrymen in such a character—if they had been branded with such/Infamy—he thonight occasion gave them a right to ask for the earliest possible opportunity to vindicate tbensst4ves, and show that they *ere not influenced by unworthy motives; that they did not deserve to be condemned as ant i-Christs, or struck off the rolls of Christianity because they had not refused to listen to the sorrows and complaints of millions of their fellow w►jects with unyielding feelings and unrelenting hearts. The Earl of ELDON said that the reasons which the Noble Duke had given for his proposal that the Bill should be read a second time on Thursday nest had, no doubt, considerable weight with the Noble Duke. He admitted that the Noble Duke must feel anxious to set tle the question, and to get rid of the obloquy which had been cast urn him, and the improptiesy which had been ascribed to him ; but i on the other handohere had been one or two reasons given which he (the Earl of Eldon) coofessed had as great weight with him per sonally. They had been told that there had already been frequent discussions in their Lordships' House on the pre sent measure. For his own part he had constantly avoid ed entering into any discussion on the measure in pre senting petitions. He thought, therefore, that their L ,rd ships should have time to consider the nature of the mea sure. If he had been aware that the Noble Duke intended to press the second reading on so early a day as Thurs day nest he should certainly have either insisted that the Bill.should have been read at length to night, or that such a course should be adopted by the Clerk of the House, or that their Lordships should be made ac quainted with the details of it at least sixteen hours sooner than they were likely to be. It was said that their Lordships must be aware of the contents of the Bill in consequence of its progress through the other House; but their L •rdships had no opportunity of seeing the Bill until the 24th March, and several amend ments had been :ince made to the Bill. At alt events the Ball had not been printed until Thursday, the 24th of M arch; and, as far as he could see, he denie.l that it was. as a Noble Lord (Holland) had said, similar to those Bills which had before been discussed by their Lord ships. He could assure their Lordships that the subj-cts of the realm would look to their deliberations with great attention, and it was necessary for the honour and dignity of the House to look to all the details of the Bill. Whatever the decision of the Legislature should be tie people ought to look to that decision with re spect and deference, as it was to be supposed that the Legislature would look to their interests with calmness and deliberation. He repeated that the Bill was neat similar to what had been bef re discussed in that House. In the first place it interfered with the Supremacy of the Crown, and any such, the most mi nute, interference in that point had at all times been deprecated by their Lordship . In the hest place. it interfered with the Church. and the Chuich in this country was a part of the State. If there were no other ground for his denial of the fact stated by the Noble Lord, this he thought was sufficient to prove that this 801 l was not similar to what had been before discussed in this House. The Noble Lord who had last spoken, in allusion to the petitions which had been presented. had stated that those petitions made misrepresentations with regard to the question. He had himself read a rem pail of those petitions, and he did not see how such a statement could be made. L►rd GODERICII rote to captain. The Eat I of ELDON proceeded.—He should be sorry to misinterpret the Noble Lord, but he had understood him to have said so. •He contended that the measure diffrred in some very important points from any other that had before been proposed He knew that great auxi ty must exist on the part of the Noble Duke to explain the mrasute which he called upon their L-•rd• shi, s to adopt; but he (Lord Elton) could assure their L •rdships—aud he sp. ke horn long experience, having himself sat on the woolsack. that their discussions would have much more weight with the country if they were the effects of deliberation. For these reasons he could not agree to the proposal that the Bill should be read a second time on 'Thursday. All that bad been asked by his Noble Friend on the cross bench was, that it should be postponed from fitursdly until Monday. It could not be said that it was for the purpose of causing unuece my delay that this proposal had been made; for if that had been their inteirtion they had it in their power to enter into a lengthened debate on every peti• tion which was presentee; and he could assure tie Noble Duke that.notwithstanding his anxiety to advance the measure, in its future progress it might be delayed more by adopting a c ur e of per cipits.rcy at present. For his own part he ho n ed that the opposi ion which the Bill should meet wirh should be catried on without resorting to those measures to which, from Par Harnett tary rules. they were entitled to resort; but if there were only two days a•lowed fur the consideration of it. he thought massy Noble Lords might consider .they were entitled to take advantage of any course of the kind to delay it. Lord HOLLAND explained. He had not stated that the B II was the same as had. been at other times before the House, but that examples were to be found of reading it a second time as early as the Noble arke had given to tice of. The Noble Earl had said that he would not take Advantage of delaying the Bill in such a way as be would be cuttled by Parliamentary usage. but at the same time he had kin ly thrown out a hint to other Noble Lords to d , r so. Lord GODLAIICH, in answer to what had fallen fr m the Noble Eu 1, begged to say that he had not said that the petitioners made misrepresentations, but that nosier e rotations had been snorted to in order to co ati- the pr. pie, and induce them to sign those Petitions. Lot d FA lINH A M admitted that the Bill was similar to those which bad been before introduced to the House, inasmuch as concession formed the basis of them; but they were not similar in point of the event of that con ces•i• n. as in none t f the former Bills was concession caused to such an extent. He •thought it was incum bent on those who depot ted from Parliamentary usage togi.e satisfactory reason. for that departure, and he had not beard a single maws given for it except this one, that the Noble Duke was anxious to relieve hinstelt fi..m the oblovy which the course bc bad adopted bad procured tot him. Under these circumstances no one could blame the Noble Doke for endeavouring to bring forsaid the Bill ; but he doubted whether that was a sat. ticient reason for then Lordships for departing from. Par. tiamentary usage.and proceed so rapidlyw itb a Bill which bad not been printed until March 4 24, and the contents of **Welt many could not of course have known sooner there *etc also, he understood, some collateral Inca antes to be intioduci d. He did not koow how those measures were to he re g arded. Some of the advicates of the Bill had declared in vie mita House that they were introduced by way of secuiiiy, while others said Neat they were brought f ward (he alluded particularly to the Disfranchisement Bils) as a eassies in themselves beneficial to the coui , tey ; but at all even s he believed it was generally understood that the Ministers would never have introduced one of those measures w ithou• ' the other, a d it war, therefore. necessa' y th t tl err Lordships should on Thursday evening t be those mew. sums into considera both of which were caksdati d tirescite public discootent. lilt was the wish of ',leis Lordships to increase the irritation whit* at present existed throughout the country they would agree to the proposal of the Noble Duke, that the Bill should be read a second WOO on Thursday fot if any tt ing could add tattle disappointment it would be that their Lord ships' House. which was supposed to be a deliberative Assembly, should not take forty-eight boors for the con• sideiati..n of so important a measure. It this measure passed it would. of course, be supposed to be a pet. manent measure; and it wait his fixed °pintos. that, the course of a year or two, the state of the country, and the demands of the people, would prove that the result of it would not be to ensure the pe..ce and seem ity of the empire. Lord ELLENBOROUGH would recollect the pro phetic declaration of the Noble Lord who had just sat down, and remind him of it at the end of a year or tie.. He admitted that it was not direc.ly according to Par liamentary usage to give the Bill the second reading two days atter it had goo the first; but this, he thought was no ordinary ca-e. What were the re isms for wish ing to postpone the second reading of the Bill? A Noble Lord had said th it there weir more than three thousand Petitions on the subject, and that they were entitled to the consideration of the House. But, if the petitioners had time to form an opinion on the Bill, surely their Lordships had the same oppoitunitt. The Noble Lord (Eldon) had said that he had not di cussed the met its of the Bill. As far as giving it the due con sideration which reason required, he believed the Notile Lord had not discu sed the merits i. if the Bill ; hut h 1 had, notwithstanding, made a riand assertion with se spect tp it, and, although he had at all times required rinse to consider a subject before i.e gave his opinson,he bad pronounced itto be a most atrocious measure. They were asked why should this Bill be read a seco .d time 'on Thursday ? He would beg their Lordships co con sider the effects of keeping the public mind in a state of anxiety= and, though he did not agree with those who said the public feeling was opposed to the pie-eot mea sum, he still thought it was so much excited that ail end should be put to distut Ware, and the just hopes of those who looked to the completion of those aleA• sures speedily gratified. He thought their L irdships would best discharge their duty by looking to Vie secu rity of the coutitey, and. by speedily passing the Bill, ensure the tranquillity which Ireland at present enjoyed even in the anticipation of ft. The Earl of CARNAItVON supported the motion. He begged to remind their Lordships that period when the power of the sword was entrusted to the C.- tholics. At that period, the year 1817, the Noble EA (Eldon) f rmed a part if the Administration ; and the Bill which entrusted Roman Catholics with that -uts ttantidl power was teed a first time on fei Way, the 27th of June, a sec nd time his t!.e very nest parli imentary day, Monday, and passed through the Il use on the fol. lowing Wednesday. He thought this was a sufficient precedent for the haste which was complained of in the present case. Lord SIDNIOUTH said. that nothing which ke had heard had in the smallest degree diminished his regret at the motion of the Noble Duke. that the Bill should be read a second time in Thursday beet. A Noble Lord, who had spoken early in the evening, and alio took a different view cf the matter from him, had al luded to the Acts of the 25th and SOth of Cheats IL and stated that the rapidity with which those Acts were passed was a sufficient piecedent for biotin the pie. sent Bill. He confessed he could tot agree with the Noble L'ird. He iepeaced that he regretted deeply that this course should be adopted—he seven, d it tor the honour and character of the Hoes-; he regretted that the Seeech of his M jesiy, which recommended them to deliberate on the whole state tat Ireldn‘l, should not he attended to. It bad been said th.t they had Amply discussed the measure; but whets he reminded their Lordships that they had, in reply to, his Majesty': Speech. given a pledge that they would takc the entire state of Ireland into deliberation. they had not by any desultory discussions they might have had in that House, on Petitions or otherwise, redeemed that pledge. Ile had expected that an inquiry should be instituted, and • Cnmmittce appointed tor the purposes recommended by his Majesty. But as they were about to proceed im mediately with the present Bill, he thought it at least should have serious deliberation. No precipitation should be used—they should not, at all event., vas) from the general usages of the 14 use. They all agreed that it was a most impottant stteastite, and theief , 4e, however, their own character and digisity required -that it should have their most serious console' ation. The Earl of LONGFORD wished to advert to one or too points which had been alluded to. A Noble Lord had quoted the example of It e rapidity with which certain measureshsd been passed in the reign . of Chat les the Second as an example to be followed an the present instance. At the time thou- measures were passed the Legisla ore acted under the inn iei.ce of fear and intinaida.ioli. He would ask, was mat thr case at present? Were they now acting under intimi dation, or were they not ? Tale suspension or the Habeas Corpus Act was also qu red; but that was only a tem porary. whereas the present was to be looked on as a permanent and irrevocable measure. The .I.ffesence was in the awful responsibility incurred, and this mem. sure differed widely from any which had ever Wine been passed. A Noble Lord (Caroarvon) had alluded to the Bill admitting Roman Catholic cffi:ers to hold high rank it► the army; but that Bill did not give any new power i but only extended the admissibility to higher lank than was before held; and in one instance it only extended that to the one country which ahead, existed in the other. He had one word to say with regard to a subject which was, in some degree, foreign to the pre sent que.ti ,, n. Allusi-in had been made to the manner in which signatures had been procured for petitions. One misreps estimation had at all events been made for the purpose of procuring signatures to the .petitions ; ' and an opinion had been spread that Roman Catholic• were excluded on account of their religious tenets, whereas it was solely on political grounds that they were excluded. He would not longer occupy their Lord ships time. but merely say that he could not vote for the Noble Duke's motion. _ _ The Earl of MALMESBURY again addressed their Lordships, with no other view than fur the convenience of the House. His opinion temained unchanged; but if their Lordships thought proper to agree to the motion, re responsibility rested on those who had brought it forwards F r his own part he protested against it, but if it was the general opinion that the motion should be carried, he would not put their Lord-hips to the incon venience of dividing. He wished to state that it was not from any motive of personal convenience that he oepo,ed the motion, but merely because he was im pressed with the importance wt preserving the dignity 4.1 the House; and, in the view which woulJ be t tken of their proceedings, not only by their contemporaries, but by posterity, the forms by which impottant 11604,111Ve were tan led, the dates and periods of the different stages of important bills, would be Mire a ttej o i r d tot thin the different feelings which might at present ;Mato emelt Noble Los d. A Noble Lord had said that poste r i ty n mild bless them f r passing this Bill. He (Lord )1.) would not prophesy whether postet.ty woof,' m ess or curse ti em, but he thotight care ought to be then *b eg the respectability, the character. and the dignity o f dy e Hone u ere at stake. Time Bari of WINCH!! SBA said, that, as his Noble Friegg W declared that it was not his intentions to divide the Hoela. he felt Nowell called upon to pretest gamut she Noble Doge, me. tie.. He thought he would not ramie the dignity of th e n ame Ibe acceded to it. It wt.* a question of vast importance. sad o s , which deeply affected the character of their linedoldps How; le i be would nut have it supposed that he was vritbia the walls of gin Hooey. and not raise his voice agdeat it. The motion that the Bell should be printed, and read a mod dew on Thursday nest, was then put and carried without a didd le. nuatemiscame On the muting of the Duke of Was.unceroa the Forty Ul u Frerbohlers Disfrandlieement wa s read a int time. n; Noble Duke then moved that it should be read a second ihneas - Friday nest; or, in case of an adiontord debate on Use Hones Catholic Head Hilt, Monday next.—The minion was agreed i t The Duke of !Ili:UNION!) could nut anon the earliest o ffer tunity to pass without protesting againat so dangerous a measur e . Ile did not believe three was any one who advocated thk aseasura on the ground of principle but stalely of espy& ncy and, 'lmo this eight be very convenient. It was certainly a very dan getem enure of proceeding. Petitions In favour of Catholic Emancipation were presented by Lord Hasonlovos. by Lard WiLLourissar, and by bard Kamm. Petitions against lure er Concessions wire presented by she of WW/CHILNIA, by aLe bishop of Lamm. and by the Dian of , liscnatoina The Karl's), RI.DON gave notice that he wou'd present went petitions against the present bill on Thursday neat. Their Lord,iiips adjourned at ilimr eats Sivas o'Cicscir. HOUSE OF COMMONS. MI %MASKS took tbe Chair at the; aqua hoer. Kell/hie/ pi ll•fee NU went through a Committee. and Gam liaviog been beard at the Bar. the Iteport was received. Sir. MOORE presented a Petition from the !Nab., and Clergy of the Diocese of Cork awl Ross against any further eoneesdon to the Roman Catholics. The Honourable Member presented i similar relate from an indiablual named Bignal.—Orderesl to Ike printed. Mr. HUME moved far Returns of the number of prisms jo the Cummission of the Peace set the counties in En11....4 sat Wales.—Ordered. The Honourable Minoan also moved for Helms of t►e listabe of persons imprisoned for debt in the 14e of Man in the years 'set and 189.9, distinguishing the sums fur whkh they were a►ea into custody; also of the number of Crown debtors In the Ide of kirk Ordered. Mr. HUMS Inquired whether any Report bad been laid oa table front the Conimitsion appointed to inquire into tln pecuniary arrangements emeriti into with the Duke or Atka! re•pecting is rights in the Isle of Man? He had been pteircuted from moving for some informatiun on the subject 1.0 &mien, 45 it was waled that it would be inconvenient to aford the House any information whilst the negodatiotts were in progress. Mr. IIERRIES said that an objection did ezidt to laying dean. meats before the tluu whilst the Were pviullifts; but as the Litmus of the Cuts.nsissiatt had 110 W dined, there was Do ddlicuky its laying all the proceedings ha fore the House. ALLFGRII BREACH Or rail/mum Mr. G DAWSON. en pt., seating a Petition from the parish of Palace lialread, county of &fry, in favour of the Ramo Catholic took occasion to state that a petition bad been presented on a former night by his Hum. Farad the Member fw the city of Derry (Sir G. Hill), to which petition be understood a signature was forged. The petition was from the Protestants of Kilrea, again.t any further concessions to the itum..ti Catholics...- The first name attached to the petition was that of the Justice of the Peace resident in the district ; and the second mune wa. that of the Piotestant Clergyman, the Rev. John Waddy. Mr. Wedgy bad since Mitten to him (Mr. Dawson) to stare that h is na m e as attached to this petition, was a forgery, for be bad skidoo eigLed it himself, nor authorised any other person to sign it..,Tbis circum stance ought really to act as a lesson to permits how they received petitions and vouched for their respectability without knowing any thing of the parties. In justice to the Rev. Mr. Waddy, his oasis ought to be struck set of the petition; hot be (Mr. Dawson) cum ceived that justice was satisfied by merely mentioning the matte, and did not feel disposed to found any inution on it. The SPRA KIER conceived That the coluninstancee stated *Awed the privileges of that Home and id dignity, as well a. oac of the most important privileges of his Majeety's subjects. fie felt it his duty to state, that be considered it *creamer that some Honourable Member should move for a Committee. -------- Sir G. HILL felt that be wm called upon to give sense espbsai don, atter the statement made by his Hon. Pianist (Mr. Dawson). The Petition which be (Sir G. Hill) had presented on a Winer evening front Kikea was transmitted to him by Mr. Dighha Magistrate of the enemy, and a Gentleman who bad the manage. swot of a large estate. The Rev. Mr. Waddy 's name was the second signed to the Petition, and it was a flutter of great astonish. meat that Mr. Rigby should have tent a Petition it be had any un pick/a that the sante of t►e Rev. Mr. Waddy was a forgery. Mr. Dishy and Mr. Waddy were resident within a quarter of a mile each other, and were on terms of great intimacy. It was extract.' dbiary,therefore, that Mr. Waddy bad Dot applied to Mr. Rigby before be wrote to disclaim the signature 'Sited to the Petitiou.— This was the only ezplanatioo which be (Sir G. Hill) was now able to give, but he had no objection to a Committee ut inquiry as my stated by the Speaker, and at alt stems be would think it necessity to apply to Mr. Dighy for further intormatiou fur ►is own sati.fac tiou.—After a few words front Mr. Hunt. Mr. G. DAWSON observed, that be bad no difficulty In leas lug it to the deaden of the Speaker, and towing fur a Committee. Ile had ably declined doing se Iran reluctance to emery the time of tie Mame. A Committee was then appointed to Inquire into the facts stated. and to Repeat to the noose on a future day. Mr. DA VICS PORT presented Petitions from persons concerned In the Silk trade in Macciesliekl. Congletoa, sad Sandbar's, pr.ying for an inquiry, sad for a change of duties.—Ordered to be presto'. Sir E. tl AItV RY presented a Petition from a pari,h in F..nz against any further Coneessious to the Boma C•tholies.—Ordered to lie on the table. _ _ Mr. LI DDRLI. reignited a Petitian from an individual named Ilurthrothaw, reddent is DurbJat, complaining of the in.uMebnry of the laws toe securing the tights of patentees.--Ordered to he printed. Mr. H. GRATTAN pprese nted a Petition from the canny of Leitrim in favour of tbe Casholies.—Ordered to he to the table. - 111 — r. C. GRANT mooed for mural Returns relating to db. Skipping interest.—ordered. Sir H. PARNELL moved for amain Returns rtLitiag to*, r Holyhead Rosda—Onkred. . Mr. Pitt/THRUM moved for Returns from the Lein-Odin of the duty received on Wills and Administrations.—Ordered. Mr. DUG HA LK pt nem. d a Petition from Stratford-en-Acs to favour of the employment of Climbing-boys.—Ord. robe primed. Mr. S. KICK moved for a Recant of the fees and 'abatements of the Registrar of Deeds lo Ireland. Lord Ma me rose to present a Petition; and at that nesentre Mr. Secretary Pm rose to carry the Roans Catholic Relief Hir to the Lords, upos which meet of the Members ptesent left the House to accompany bin, amongst the number was the Noble Lord.' Mr. 0. CAVIL presented Petitions ham various pause( Inhale some of which were 'pion the Vestry and Sub-letting Acts, sad others in favour of Roman Catholic MMus. He also promoted one in favour sf eivll and reheats liberty from a coogregatioe Protestant Dissenters assembling at Lowelhavegib ChapeL Mr. LANHAM) moved for various ream respecting tin number of causes tried in the Middlesex County Coen since the appointment of the present county clerk, amount of fees, A& de sums received, hew the balances are loitered, he. The Hen' Member observed that the accounts would be important to sirs the stets of such Court, especWly as the number of ceases the re ha lately very much increased. He doubted not that the fees might reduced, and that would secure to the poor the obtaining of *dm e. a cheaper rate. The Judge ought to be paid by a Seed ar.les. not by tree; and be thought the Judge might be midi, a d' (=inquired to devote a greater number or days in the Tented* of causes. At present the Judge beard, on an avenre ISO causes an each sitting day. The returns of the mem of balsam would also be important—in seven yews he wagoner' they amounted to 14,000 L and upwards. When the returns inn, made, it would be to determine what course ought to be posPed for the better mulattos of the Court. He should be glad if RI Hemellea etary would take this subject into his con.ititrrinsi be w el sure the results might then be advantageous and Apr- He w. ' eluded with moving for the wend atomics, which were ceded Lord LOVIrHER mooed for leave to bring in a Rh tompret. the Turnpike Acts Censaktios Bill North of the bletrorik• ADKRLT supported the motion, ebony* tint !II camel , was much kedehted to the Noble Lord for what be ill already dose; end that tie Rill had been astound with swes sad redo Sate between 1 Bs C. BUR onwpideed at epos kw My • ::•= "1118 1e se in nowadid i wed walgodmi d lb Mpoll die I prowedings. far leforsear dud farther tha Asa. or abet anal the law b gamma. the i •t C. butt by de Home 8 Alicia serboriti sordingly. At berosed Orem Foley to tier pi Mr. H. DIU regulate the regi alter MAC t•wa Yr. DA WS( Supply on the U Ile Ilouse vs, The Cli A °brats he tud tingulshing the e have been bough &rate evasion five to 011 e per to lots be contempt eventually to a a Wag resoloclon present Juba.. exceeding 10" C visw lo,oeed 14 per con. aad Vibes Io,ooul 111. per seat. as We above 40,000/. slid 1,. lots pot up to sal In reply to i. A. Dawson. Ike lineation was pm Itesnisike air Lord LOWTI Jun.—Reid a Ar Friday. The raatataini jammed at a QUJ ) Or imm Tuns Abercromby, Hi Hon. J. Arland. FAr T. Alezander. J. Althorn. Lord Amon. Sir G. • Anson. Hon. G. AParT. Lard Arbuthnot. Rt. H Arbuthnot. Hon A reedrckne. A. Ashley, Lord %Hite, CoL Balfour, J. Barclay. C. Barclay, D. Bating, A. Baring, W. B. Baring, F. Beaumont. T. W Beetle, Earl Benett..J. Bentinclt. Lord I' Ilerauford,•Slr J. Brreaford. Lt. Cc Bernard, T. Bingham, Lord Bitch, J. Male. Sir F. Doyle. Hon..J. Bourne. lit. Hee. Bred:sock. Earl Drogden, J. Bromislum. J. J. *o_ _ _ wnlow. C. Brava. CaL iiisher. C. Ihrass. ar F. bastait i T. F. Bunged. O. BM, Calash. Rt. Ha 11141 ePe , Hoe. Calvert. C. Calvert. J. Calvert. N. Campbell. A. Campbell, W. Campbell, J. Carew, Carrington, sat CittVifight. W. Castlereagh, Vin Caulfield. lion. I Cave, Itt CAvernksh. Lord Cavendish. C. Chichester. A. Clerk, Sir G. agllttill.. Vise. Clifton. Vise. Clive, Vi-e. Clive, Run. Rt. (•fare. R. Clive. 11. Coalman,. Sir O. Cocks J. __ .... Culbu;ne ' N. Ri 4 d Cole, BC__ Coolie, Sir IL Come, Sir C. Culprit. l'.. Cuurtei:ay, lit.lto Cradock. S. Cramyturt; S. Daly. J. Desii:on. A. Draison, W. J. - Denlwo, J. Dobrny, J. Doinitiaa, W. It. Drummed, 11. I Dunne, I'. Darlingtim. Karl Dillitantloll, ViSC INUIC0111b.:, T. S. Ueda. lb" G' I) .4uidas, It Mudd% C. Maze, Sir K. lia4shope, J. Emits r. V i.couti Ebrissgtun, Vigo ZJcn, Hon. It. ktiot. Lord Ult. Hun. G. A Hum Aup Ellison. C. 1411361001. r, Vic kmatt. W. Fanr, lion. H. 9 Yana, T. Farquhar, Sig R. Fazai.erlay, J. N liergmon, Sir It Ferguson, It. C. Fringe' aid, Ruth Fitzgerald, Lord ltt.llc J. Fitzgibbon, Hon F acY. J. H. H. Forbes Viscount Forbes, Sir C. Vorbes s , J. Female. Him