Star. — London, England, 1827-04-28 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Aran 47. The LORD CHANCELLOR came down to Lincoln's Inn Fall, this morning, at eleven o'clock, for the purpose of giving Judgment in the cases of es Pitt v. Davis," 14 Latham v. Parry," and , g Brown v. De Tastet." . After the parties concerned in the above causes bad been waiting in the Hall for some time, His LORDSHIP directed his Secretary to inform them, that, in consequence of his having a violent head-ache, be should not be able to dispose of any of the cases he had appointed for - Judgment, this morning, but he would certainly do so to-morrow. His Lordship ordered a notice to be affixed to the Hall, stating, that he should sit in his private room, at ten o'clock, to-morrow. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Arm rt. "' The Court were occupied with pleas and demurrers, of no public interest. In the course of the morning, his HONOUR said, that be was very anxious to know whether there remained any cases in'which he had noesergiven his judgment ? is I am very desirous, indeed," observed his Honour, el to ascertain this fact, as soon as possible; and I hope that the Gentlemen of the Bar will have the goodness to inform me whether they are aware of any and cases?' Mr. HORNR assured his Honour that he would make the necessary inquiries on the subject. COURT OF KING'S BENCii, Ana. rt. WATSON 9. OLIIIMIUM This wile an action for a nuisance. The plaintiff is s linendriper, residing at the corner of Surrey-street, in the Strand, and the defendant is the proprietor of the Morning Chroxick Newspaper. The action was brought against the defendant for having erected on his pre mises, adjoining plaintiff's house, a steam engine and printing presses, the noise of which occasioned consi derable annoyance to the plaintiff and his family. The defendant pleaded " Not Guilty." The copies of the two records of the Judgments in for." mer trials of " Watson u. Clement," were first produced med read ; they bore date inlantary, 1825, and De eiliber, 1828. Francis Watson etamined.—.Xnew the plaintiff Wat son, who resided at the corner of Surrey-street, in the Strand; also knew the defendant, Mr. Clement, who is the ostensible proprietor of the Morning Chronick. In November last year witness slept at the houce of Mr. Watson, and was much annoyed during the night by a loud thumping noise, which witness supposes proceeded from the working of the printing machines at the Morning Chronicle office. - The noise commenced at three o'clock in the morning, and continued about four hours. Witness was awakened by the noise, and has no doubt that it came from Mr. Clement's house. Wit ness was examined on the two former trials ; was in the frequent habit of visiting the plaintif, and whenever be slept at the house, was sure to be disturbed. The disturbance was greater during the night than in the day. Witness was engaged in a noisy business himself, and was not as likely to be disturbed As another person. Cross-examined—Witness could not recollect the particular night that he slept in Watson's house. Re members that Watson told him at the time, that he in tended bringing an action, and spoke about his (witness) giving evidence on the trial. Mr. FtcA ALATT.TheII you went to bed for the pur pose of hearing a noise. Is not that the fact? (Laughter.) The night in November was the first night th.t wit ness ever slept in the house, but has slept there since re peatedly. The noise was like a continual thumping, or the working of a great pump. The locking up of the for ms also occasioned a noise, like knocking of blocks. Mr. Burford, residing in the next house to the plain tiff in Surrey-street, described the nature of the nuisance in nearly the same language as the last witness. Pre vious to the erection of the printing machine, the nui sance did not exist. There is a greater noise on Saturday nights than on any other occasions, because several Sunday Papers were printed on that night. In witness's opinion, it was impossible for the plaintiff's family to enjoy comfortable repose while the nuisance existed. Miss Ann Miller had been examined on the last trial ; is a friend t 8 plaintiff; has frequently slept at Mr. Wa tson's house since the last trial, and was invariably dis turbed early in the morning; always heard the clock strike the hours of four, five, six, and seven. Witness slept in November and December last, at Mt. Watson's, end slept there last week; the noise was still as into lerable as before. Cross-examined—Witness was generally in bed from four to six hours before she heard the noise. J. Miller—ls a stationer, living in Cursitor-street, Chancery-lane; has frequently taken a bed at plain tiff's house ; cannot say he slept there ; he no sooner fell into a doze than be was roused by a noise like the striking of blocks. Mr. SCAALETT then addressed the Jury for the de fendant. He admitted, that if the Jury believed that the plaintiff was disturbed and annoyed by a noise, whether it was a rumbling or thumping noise, he was entitled to a verdict. No matter how beautiful the opera. tion of this engine might be, or how useful to the public, if it had been productive of serious injury to the plain tiff, be was entitled to damages. fie hoped, however, to be able to convince the Jury that every thing, which it was possible to do had been done by the defendant, and that the present action was one of a very.vexatious character. Two actions had been pre viously brought, and he admitted that from the period when the last of those actions had been brought, un til the period when Mr. Clement set about altering his engine, the nuisance bad existed. Previous to the last action Mr. Clement conceived conscientiously, that no reasonable man living in the Strand—a part of the town where coaches passed every hour of the night —could find fault with the inconvenience arising from the engine. It was well known that persons coming to town from the country could not sleep for some nights in any of the noisy parts of the town ; but where persons were accustomed to live in those parts of. the town, they could sleep as soundly as its the country. However, the Jury would hear that Mr. Clement had done all in his power to meet the ob. jection of the plaintiff. The plaintiff complained of the vibration which was caused by the engine in his houna and to remedy this inconvenience, the defendant actually effected a wall between the two houses, and filled up the ite between with saw-dust to the depth of 15 inches. arrangement. however, did not satisfy the plaintiff; le said, you must remove your engine—it will be a great expense—but no matter, it must be removedi In compliance with this suggestion, Mr. Clement had ac tually removed the engine, at an expense of actual hundred pounds. Whilst this was being effected, the defendant could not of course give up his property, which was the source of a Urge income to him; but alteration was effected with as much haste as could be reasonably expected. Even this,. however, did not satisfy the plaintiff, and be proposed to assign the lease of his house to Mr. Clement for fourteen years, at a rent of 180/. a year. Mr. Clement acceded rp this pro position, great as the rent was, and Mr. Watson then came forward with a new demand. He asked for a premium of 8001. and a rent of 1901. a year for a fourteen years' lease. The ohject of the plaintiff clearly was, by bringing frequent actions, to compel Mr. Clement to come to any terms, or else to give up the whole of his valuable property. He (Mr. Scarlett) trusted that the Jury wpuld not aid the plaintiff in such an object. A new engine had been substituted for that which had annoyed the plaintiff, and no reasonable cause of complaint now existed. Until the new engine was constructed, he admitted that the l nuisance had existed, and therefore that a verdict must pus for the plaintiff; but as he should prove that that engine was erected and worked before the 9th of No. vember, he should submit that no nuisance bad existed subsequent to that date, and consequently that the Jury could not take any period after that date into their consideration. _ _ Mr. Tucker, surveyor of the parish of St. Clement Dapes, was then called.—He was acquainted with both the parties, and asked the plaintiff to come to some terms with Mr. Clement, and the plaintiff said that he would be glad to get rid of the praises on any term and that it Mr. Clement would give him 1801. a year, he would give up the house altogether, and assign the lease. Witness mentioned this circumstance to Mr. Clement, who agreed to the proposal ; but upon mess• timing the subject again to plaintiff, he said that he would not take 1801. per Year, bits that be would take 1401. a year, and a .fine of 8001. Several witnesses were also called to prove the cost, of the present engine, and that it was so fixed as to prevent noise and vibration. - Witnesses were alto called to prove at what time the new engine began to work; but they were unable to speak decidedly upon the point, and merely stated that they believed it to have been in October. Mr. Gunge: replied. The Loan Cruel Juane& said, that there had been two trials on the same subject, and that damages bad been obtained on both occasions. It had been contended that no verdict could be given for nuisance subsequent to the 9th of November. The declaration spread as far as the 18th November, and if what had been contended for was to hive been granted, it could only have been by the defendant shewing when the new engine hid be gun to work. In this, however, the witnesses spoke with great uncertainty ; they all said they believed it to hive been in October, but then several witnesses on the other side had spoken to the existence of the nuisance subse quent to that period. The plaintitEtherefore, was entitled to a verdict. The next question then was, the amount of damages. It appeared that the old engine had been removed, and another erected in its stead. This had not been done without considerable cost; a circumstance which was not perhaps altogether unworthy of the con sideration of the Jury. At the same time, however, it must be recollected, that the defendant had not :moved this nuisance until he had gone twice to trial upon the subject.—The Jury retired for about a quarter of an hour, and then returned a verdict for the plaintiff— Damages, 2001. COOS V. THE EARL Of SCARSDALE. This was an action brought by Mr. William Cook, executor and son of the late Mr. John Cook, against the Earl of Scarsdale. Mr. MARRYATT ,said, that the facts of the case were these:—So long ago as the year 1784, Mr. John Cool obtained a judgment against theisEarl of Scarsdale for 1,0651. Is. and 60s. COM. Up to the month of April in that year, the Earl of Scarsdale had a seat in Parliament. Parliament basing been dissolved in that month, and he not being reelected, found it necessary to go abroad, where he remained for twenty years. The Learned Counsel was here interrupted by a pro position from the other side, the result of which was, a verdict of £6OO for the plaintiff given by consent. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. DIDD AND *TRW V. ASTON, aarrvirus, AND PLIMICID. This action was brought by Bird and Company, who carry on the business of iron founders, at Cardiff, in Wales, to recover 4,1321. for goods sold and delivered to the defendants, as three shareholders of a Company calling itself the Imperial Distillery Company. The single question for the consideration of the Jury was, whether these goods were furnished on the credit of 'the partnership, or whether they were furnished on the credit of Griffith, who acted as engineer to the Company? The case for the plaintiffs was conducted by Mr. SCARLETT. The'Cosmos SEROSANT was Counsel for defendants. The plaintiffs laboured under great difficulty in proving the three defendants were partners, but finally succeeded in making out that fact. The three de fendants had become partners in the Imperial Dis tillery Company by a deed executed in July, 1825. The goods were supplied in October following. The Company having been formed to carry on a distillery, it was requisite to have a quantity of iron work. It rip• peared that an advertisement was published by the 'Company, calling upon persons to offer tenders of terms upon which supplies necessary for the Company could be furnished. Griffiths, who had bun appointed en gineer, accepted the terms 'offered for the supply of the articles, and applied to the plaintiff, Mr. Bird, to carry his contract into effect. Several letters passed between them, and it was stated that the goods were for the Im perial Distillery Company. The plaintiffs supplied the articles, and drew bills on the Secretary for the Com pany. The observations made by the Secretary induced the plaintiffs to believe Griffiths was the Agent of the Company, and that he acted by their authority. Some doubts afterwards occurred on the subject, and Ga. fiths and the Secretary went down to Cardiff. They sa tisfied the plaintiffs that the goods were ordered with the authority of the Company ; application was afterwards made to the Company to explain a report l which appeared in some of the London Papers, refiecting, on the firmness and stability of the Company: To that' letter the Directors ordered their Solicitor to write an answer, and inform the plaintiffs there was no founda tion for the report. He was instructed, at the same time, to avoid any expression which might make the Company liable to the plaintiffs. On the part of the defendants two bills .of exclunte which the plaintiffs bad drawn upon Griffiths wete read. The plaintiffs also bad taken at~ assignment of all that was due to Griffiths frons.the Company; and the inference was, that the plaintiffs could not have done that, if he had not been sensible he had no claim's on the Company. It was firther contended, that the plaintiffs bad no right to Indict the defendants to pay their demand. They might 'have soecktbeDitectors, who had the lola manegemeat of the concern. The Loan Ca n at► lomat said the law was •ery clear. Those who furnished goods to a Joint Stock Company had a right to sue every one who was a mem. ber of that Company. It was most unfortunate, he said,l when persons exposed themselves to such perils, but he coold not help them. His Lordship lett the Jury to decide upon their belief, whether the goods were supplied on the credit of the Company, or that of Mr. Griffiths? The Jury, without the least hesitation, found a ver dict for the Plaintiffs—Damages 4,1321.65. _COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Arm 27. OTATI.2III, 241ND114 AND CO. v. LOVORWAN, o'sauir. . . AND Co. , • This was an action for the recovery of two bills of exchange-22,7301. The facts of the case, as stated by Mr. Sergeant BoSANQURT, fer the plaintiffs, appeared to be these :—ln the beginning of the year 1825, when the rage fee speculation and joinestock companies Was so pirevalent among the mercantile and other classes, the defendants, Messrs. Loughnan, O'Brien ' and Co. respietabinmerchants, of London, sent out Mr. Alex. Multitude, in the character of agent, to Mexico, for the ipurposes of obtaining, by contract, the richest mines of old and silver, copper and qoicklilver, vihich be could nd in the Republics of Mexico ind Guatimala, and the States of central America--of negotiating loans of Mooney to any of the aforesaid States, for obtaining chit eignmetas 16 their house (Loughnan, O'Brien, and Ce.) of metals, itarsaparilla, cochineal, and ether valuable eommoditiesind, lastly, for opening a navigable canal between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. For the accomplishment of these important objects, they supplied him (Mr. Mackenzie) with thirty pounds cash. a copy of instructions, and a power of attorney, to draw on them by bills. for such sums of money as may be subsequently necessary for the undertaking. Mr. Mackenzie set out on his speculative mission in February, 1825 ; arrived in the city of Mexico the following April; examined several mines, and entered into contracts for the possession of three or four of them, some of which were situated in the district of Real del Monte. In the course of his negotiations and subsequent management of the mines, he . found it convenient to raise money, by bills, from the plain tiffs, Messrs. Staples and Co. a mercantile house in Mexico, on the credit of his instructions and power of attorney. These bills the plaintiffs transmitted for payment to Messrs. Loughnan and Co. London, but the value of mining ,and other joint stock specula tion, property having fallen very low in the interval between the mission of Mr. Mackenzie ppd the arri val of the bills in England,' the defendants disclaimed all responsibility, and refused to pay the bills. The plaintiffs, of course, brought the present action. The material part of these facts were proved by the agent, Mr. Mackenzie. The copy of instructions and power of attorney granted to him, were put in and read before the Conn. Mr. Sergeant Wm's, for the defendants, contended that the agent, Mr. Mackenzie, who drew these bids on the defendants, had exceeded the limits of the authority conferred oa hint—that the plaintiffs ought to have as certained his observance of the instructions before they advanced money to him, and that as they had neglected to do so, they tad no claim on the defendants; and finally, that Mr. Mackenzie, having deviated from his instructions, was alone responsible for the repayment of ' it to the plaintiffs. In support of ;hese a:legations, the Learned Sergeant produced several letters trom Mr. Mackenzie to the defendants, in which he acknowledged that he had passed the bounds of the powers granted' to him. -The LOAD CHM/ JUSTICI briefly repeated the facts of the case, and declared his opinion that the plaintiffs were justified in advancing money to Mr. Mackenzie, on examining his copy of instructions and power of attorney, and on their ascertaining, by personal obser vation, that he was employed :mad employing others in the execution of the objects specified in the instructions given to him by the defendants. Verdictfor plaintiffs— Damages, 2,7301. • This closed the Nisi Prins Sittings at Guildhall. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL Toaterday a young woman complained of the parish olikers of St. Sepulchre's for refusing to grant her relief, on the pretence that her husband was an Irishman, and that they were only bound to pass her to Ireland, which they were willing to do. The applicant stated that she was born in London, of English parents, and that her husband, who deserted her soon after marriage, was not as Irishman, but a Frenchman. She declared she would rather beg fiom'door to doer in England than be sent to Ireland, where she knew no one, and what, as there was no relief for the poor, she should certainly starve. It was stated that it bad been decided by the Judges that an Saglishwonren, by marrying a native of Ireland or Scotland. lost all right to parochial relief; and in the event of becoming chargeable, were •to be rectioved, with their children, though born in England, to the country where the father was horn. The parish beadle stated that he had learned frau the nastier of t h e pauper's husband that he was born in Iceland. .0o this state ment the Alderman (Autn.er) dim:heed the 'application, HATTON.GARDEN. A street-beeper of St. Andrew's, Holborn, was charged with overstepping the bounds of his duty. A Mr. Croft stated, that as passing through Leather-lane be saw this man, w►o is " vested with a little brief authority," overturning a pour woman's apple stall. and kicking the fruit about the street. He remonstrated with hlm without effect. and at last Witted that the matter aboeld be brought before a Magistrate. Defendant sal4 he WM dovetailed by his employers with dismissal if be did Mx cleat the streets. Mr. Realms observed, that be would never justify any one in the seal. administration of his oMm, but from what he knew of the present parties, he did not think there was just cause of complaint, and therefore dismissed the case. MIL BY-L A. BON NE: Yesterday a young women, named Centime Ittylvolds,in the ow -1 vice of a Gentleman named Batt, who resides at Si. Agnes' VIM. Bayswater, was charged with having robbed her master, in rattier a novel manner. It appeared. that on Saturday last bk. and Mrs. Batt left town for a couple of days, and during their *hence the prisoner employed a locksmith, for the purpose of taking the locks of nearly all the drawers and cupboard, in the house, and to put on new ones. She then took the key. of the new locks into bee own possession, and by - these menus she obtained an easy admittance to her master's property. Mr. Batt stated that he bad missed various articles from the cupboards, sack as table linen, glasses, grocery, ace. but not to any considerable amount. They bad received an excellent character with the prisoner when she entered their service, and until their return to town they entertained no suspicion wha tever of her dishonesty.— The prisoner, on being asked if she had anything to my, buret into tears, and declared her Innocence of any Isindoes intention. She had the misfortune, while het master and were absent, to break two wine glasses which were owls and the had employed the smith to break ern tie e=that site might take out two glasses to replace drew she bad Mr. Heaton thought that the prinmir 'night have had mese confederates and remanded her for a fist days, that further Inquiries might be m ade. Last eight a genteelly-dressed yew. on who gave his name Mary hula, was charged with **nig pockets in the Wadi* bald that afternoon et the Ilene Basses', In Zing-street; 'Rom! mae-siews. It "peered, that la the Deane of the *..seen.' six geoteeldesidog yams sm. entered the peed of the Beam. Die of them exclaimed " Now le the IWO.* Ayr jittd-4 sem ;" sad am of tbe parry then placed Mandl in the getew, 7 andtihstrvetid the progress of those persons who were coming out of the riding wheel, and almost Immediately afterwards the pd. mow headed • Gentleman named Jones, residing in U. nioupstroit, sod his pocket ems picked of twelet shinier. & Ir. Jan's eon Seised the ',demo., but a man of remeettible appi arinte came op pad said he was an aloe, and enlered him to mew the young man, and advised Mr. Jones to be cautious. The pit km ,.,. was thew allowed to ewer, bat ke was sobsetuently r imed apprehended. Ms prisoner was congalttml. W °MIMI P.STBZET. A shoemaker, residing in Thomastooft, fed blelsol-street, 11,4. nabgreen was committed, for want of charged wi t h awl treating pis two children, ow eight, the other, years*. MARRIED. The 44th inst. tt liGitnburgh, Viscount Sarlock, eldest daushter of C. 0. 8. Monteath. Eaq. of Closebt"Pili."lo4., DIEM Avila tp, at Banleak, in the Best Tidies, Ed win ' m etwta. But frond Judge of the Cirmilt of Moershedabad. PeK , IT regretted by his family and friends, at Barmiest. N I the Seth of September. trill, of a fever, the Hon. Wm. g t , p i e ,„ second ma of Lord Le Despesmer, of the Hun. Bast India pany's Service, and Aid.du•Cansp to Lord Comberweie, c os , mantles. in Chief at BengaL Monday, at Cheltenham, Prang Twisa, Rai. la the gp t h rase his age. He was contemporary at Cambridge with )Ir. whom be studied at Pembroke College under Dr. Toadies, d e Bishop of Winchester. He es&ried Mlles F. Babble, m ia of Siddons's younger sisters, whom he survived by abou t r ow They have left several sons and daughters, the tWerc of w h im Mr. Horace Twin, the Member for Wuottee &nett. . se • - --- s---- - 7--....--.. 1410/GATE sae LIZADENHALL MARKETS, Arm el, Beif... 3s 4d to 41 4d 1 Vag 34 4,j to 54 04 Mateo .. ..... As 4d to lis 44 1 Pork - 3 l 3l NI to 5 , 44 Laval) 40 ed•to Is W. maks ov, HAY Aso STRAW YRS' — FRATTAT -- " sr. Janis's. 111 / 1 1MIC11APIL. Hay 41 os od to 61 104 06 I Hay 41 os to si Iwo Clover 94 to 04 1 00Ver Ot 10* to 61 ISt 611 Straw 11190 Od to 21 61 Oti I Straw 11 161 to 21 Is oi PRICE OF HOPS, PER . CWT. Assail. MEW POCWICTS. 1111 M gAgg. Kent 901 to 190 s Keit 78 $ to No Susses ll6s to 100 s SWIM 701 to Als Basel Sarnhata fine 160$ to 1110s—Ileconds. 140 s to Iso. Old Duty laid it 2110,000. ...PRICK OF LEA'T'HER., Best Dressing -Hides ...... 130 to 154 Common Ditto Crop Hides, 35 to 4016 s for cutting Ditto 45 to 501 W 15d to 17d Calf Skis's, 16 to 401bs ...... 17d to 244 Ditto 50 to 701bs Ditto 70 to 001bs 20ed to fetig Small S&s, Green1and)............. led to Mid Tanned Horse Hides Spanish Hone Hides—. ••;/ • • •• •• •. • • 14d to Ittl PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP Ore. per Ilitie. Town Tallow 44. Od I Yellow Soap . Yellow Russia ... ..... 40s Od Maeda .. ....... White ditto ....... .. .. —s Od Card Soap ditto Melting Staff ... ..... ... 55s Od Good Dins ............ is of COURSE OF EN Amsterdam l2 4 C.F. Ditto at aight 111 1 Rotterdam...2U 12 Antwerp . 12 Hamburgh te US7 li Altona ... ti 11 27 Al Paris,Sday'ssightU is Ditto U 22 so Madrid...... 35a Cadiz .......:.... 231 Barcelona ...... —ss} Balboa . . .... 34 CHANGE, Aram 27. Sevilla ..... 53j Gibraltar—, .. 41 Lei6or.2 47 * Geboa Ventre ..... 41 Malta ...... Naples Palermo ...,.... I i4sl par as Lisboa— ...... . . 492 Rho Janeiro Dublin Cork. ...... PRICKS OF GOL Foreign Gold in Bars ..... Silver, in bars, standard.... . .... ~...... ..... AI 17 6 COAL MARKET, Aram 27. Ship at Market. Ships Sold. Pike. 301 Newcastle 431 29s Od to Mot 24 Sunderland if • 36s 9d to 38. Si *AILS -1 AS& MIN 1 0 DAY. lila. M. Frames 0 I Hamburg 0 0 Hamden 1 Sweden 0 0 Malta 0 America 0 Leeward bleeds 0 0 Z o Goerows and Jersey 0 0 Lisbon 0 0 nagbadee 0 0 HtienosAirft 0 0 0 0 HIGH-WATER at LON Morning Afternoon DMZ TO IdORROW. 1 minutes atter 4 15 minutes atter 4 LLAKE'S GENUINE PILLS, justly .famous fat curing, in all its stages, the VICNBRRA L DUMAS!' One smaU Pill is a dose, and the taking of one Box, in a mat ease, will soon convince the patient of the certainty el his sr* recovery.. Nothing can be better ceetnlved, snare safe, or new convenient than this Remedy, far wakes are obliged to go jam* or to see, as it needs no confinement ear restraint of Diet; sal sixty years experience (in an extensive preetice) has proved chats will effect a Cure when repeated Salivation and all other methods avail" nothing. For the Scurvy and other Chrenical Disemblul ibis Medicine has not its patella. Upwards of 40,000 persons et both sexes have been radically cured of the above anti Ow den, within the last eight Team. Prepared and sold by the sat T. TAYLOR and SON. Members of the Royal (hi. C le o n' Surgeons, at their Moose, Na 9, New Bridge-stmet. s Banes of only lb. 91. each, duty imanded.---N.B. Tire back doors, and Lights in the Passers at night.—They are also by astir appointment, with mums directions, at the Twig, 10s, Oxise‘wmt• Mr. Disbarough's, No. 7, F14'40,44 1 , awatly s n edie the and by am Person in sway csa. *Aerobia Town in Great Britain and Ireland. Advice grois ts p weer taking theabove, or other of the Proprietor's Medicine. DE, COURTENAY'S NEW WORE, Price 46. A N HISTORICAL and PRACTICAL TREATISI li au SYPHILIS. Otherrhse, Girds, Seeded _„ . .sdaddis Saieiures, Eruptions, Noise, nod NectsrlildlPeina, sd mistakes for Ebenthatisio. Dim subjects are illastraledb7 of highly interesting cases, together with the Miseries al a am° I lice, so long and so unhappily pursued by the youth of belt sesas I. the one it will be found the radios source o f Barreaness; other have its ravages fatally developed by a eleventh, dd i debility, which, if not timely remedied, terminates in lasPotf w° ' then are its remote and ultimata effects, while Consomptioallid of Muscular Power, and varioth Nervosa Complaints, 'Aud II i . *factorise th e earlies t *rages of this met destructive and imilsed habit ; for the cure of which, arm& of tramway the resit 4 keg and racceriforpractico, tad at .are min, speedy, did died °4 , is adopted by the Ascher. With encleding Remarks ea the od resehlag froth attempts st Self Care. Prindpils abate ; sere naellthsa Wean By C. R.DOURTENAY, MD. Rebervetreat, Athdpisi. Pdete4 for the Amber Publiehed and sold by Sutherland+ Na 9, Carton-street, Edinburgh; Sherwood and Co. Paternage . row • thawhyst, 4, CatberhatNatrect; &rand ; Walker , 90, filtb Help.= ; Chappell and Soo, Grabs; Marsh, 157, Oafordttreei Chapple, 94, raisin g Break, Opera Accede; and.nsay be bad.' all Boolusikva le town and country. " Animist the numerates Medical and Surgical Works of the day, we consider that written by Dr. Courts:nay, ea Syphilis, sal other frequently fatal complaints, babe worthy of the highest our Wean, amid justly desetvisi do smiths anemias of ill those penal who awry aafortroately happen te: be aided with the maladies width form the subject of this very ipteressiog lumina views taken of these diseases, together with idiriw - __ A warning. against excesses, entitle this work to great praise; we may add, as a further reenmsaudatice, that it is written wid Such delicacy and therailty.'lnapector and ditenty Review._ Leper: Printed sad &MANI Jena Naves, the PAO° at the hes Orrice, Na. 1, , Temp 1 1 '4lO • . .. .! . ; ' 1 , = i•aliP ~.u ti . ~.; t . -.1 1:;•:- , . it j : tai • lit • - 3 , .....:640 ' ..,. 4 • ..., . • .. so b.: —• 1 • .1 . . . - s :1 Amid AA. •..., sal )II La -! IPA il ) 1 , a • ' Su Pei ono 1 . lis rli• .1 fol 4 ,4 Nvli ▪ 2 Ad vi .11 A 444 ~. 1,...; w sr )1 a - 'CO n I a , . d , a :it tb 1 ft el • a I. am it 11. a ii I --.. d. Pi 7 11. 6. a .. 4 i 4 es IP a a tit Ye 1 d . t; ;;• • 1 . 6.. M 1 4 i.l. nll 1 - I Ind, te• nib !et i 44 . ths al 16Cr MO 'I. iti to • of • pro r. ..... ...-. 4 ....- 10 . , t