Star. — London, England, 1826-06-08 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COUta OF,CHANCERY, Jos 7. SIPA RTR GRIHITIAD, (N RR HOWARD AND DIRBIL The LORD CHANCELLOR having to-day resumed his judgm••nc in this cause, commented on the petition and affidavits of Grimstead: He said.that on Friday next he hoped to be able to go through the evidence of the cue, when it would not be difficult to decide upon it. He thought the consideration was, whether the trans actions between Grimstead and Howard and Gibbs were usurious or not; and in that view two points would arise for consideration ; whether or not Grimstead knew the nature of the transactions ; and if not, whether it would be consistent with the safety of human affairs, and with the principles on which evidence was received, that the representations of a party concerned should alter the nature of the transactions when they came to be de cided on in a Court of Justice? WELLICELEY V THE DUKE OF KEA UFORT. Mr. Hens asked when his Lordship would eve judgment in this muse • The Loan Cumiceizoa said that the affklovits were very long. There was one of Mr. Pitman and another of Mr. Dligh, which would occupy some time. He would, however, contrive to read them through on Saturday night, so ai to dispose of the cause within the term. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Jury 7. FORTH V.BURKe. The defendant in this case drew two promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff, one for 1001. at two years; the other for 2001. payable in four years, " if .1 live." When the first became due, he paid 501. declaring himself unable then to pay the remaining 501. The plaintiff ac cordingly sued him now for both sums, as the four years were expired (deducting the SCI. received in part pay ment of the first note). The CAMP Janice refused to admit the note drawn for four ears—fuse--to be legally binding; and accordingly the Jury found a verdict for the defendant on that count ; and for the plain- tiff on tie promissory note payable bi two years. ICIIENZ AND 80118 V. A. MARTIN, ESQ. (late M.P.) The subject of this action was a bill of exchange for 2401. drawn by the plaintiffs nn the defendant. Ex ceptions were t4ken against a verdict for the plaintiffs ? , on t•te ground -that the defendant's hand-wliting bad not been proved. The Court, however, declared the defendant's admission of tke debt, and of his willingness to renew the bill (both proved in evis dente) were sufficient grounds for the Jury finding for the plaintiff. THZ KING V. TARBUCK AND CARRINGTON. The defendants, who had been found guilty of con spiracy to delraud the Trustees of the Liverpool Docks Company, appeared, on the motion of Mr. SCARLErr, to receive judgment. One of them was a ship broker, the other held a confidential situation in the Docks; there was a third person admitted to their plan of de. frauding Vie Dock Company of tolls and dues. The third person, to save himself, made a d'scovery of the transaction which led to the conviction of the defendants. It appeared they had suffered nine months' imprison ment, wi:h the loss of their bread ; and, in short, ail their futu.e prospects wete destroyed. The Couar, taking into consideration all the circumstances, sen tenced them to beimprisoned six months in the House of Correc tion, at Kirkdak, in the county of Lancaster. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. NORRIS V. CRES WELL. Mr. Serjeant VAUGNAN applied to the Court for a rule to show cause why the defendant in this case should not be permitted to give an equitable consideration in eischarge of a post-obit bond, given by him to the' plaintiff in the year 1815, under the following circum stances : Mr. Cress well, in the year 1815, was, as young men are often found to be, in want of a sum of money, which he was desirous of obtaining upon a post-obit bond, dependent upon the demise of a father and aunt, and had for that purpose entered into a newitiation with the plaintiff, upon terms that were not a li tie sin• gular. He agreed to give a post obit bond for 5,0001. payable on the dem: se of his relatives, to have the in terest deducted at first, and also to give a colla:eral warrant of Atto: ney, upon which judgment was entered on the day after the co :tract ; and in return he was to receive twenty-six original pictures, to be selected for him from 'a larger collection. These were to be all un doubted originals, and valued so moderately, that the warmest assurance was given they would only fall it] value, perhaps 1001. on the whole amount, when offered for public sale, so that the only difference between the price to Mr. Cr esswell, and the sumshe would afterwatds realize for them, would-be just as much as woad mark a cash and credit price. This safe stipulation was added to prevent any possible sacrifice of the property—that if any of them were knocking down at the auction at 9.5 per cent. under invoice price, then they were to he bought in. In pursuance of this agreement, twenty-six of these famous originals were selected and laid by fur l the defendant, and he gave his bond and warrant of at-1 torney in due form for them. The first of these pictures was a very capital one for such a contract: the subject was— The Return of the Prodigal Son—(A laugh) Then there was a Guercino, price 450 guineas; a Holy Family, by Caracci, 200 guineas; a portrait of a Vene tian family, by '1 itian, formerly from King Charles the First's collection, 400 guirreas ; a Bacchus 2nd ...dacha. 400 Av.; a Claude.' orraine, lair Jscape and 1501. a Holy tomily, 2501. Lord Chief Justice liesr.—Are not some of these pictures esti. mated at too low a price for great originals. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHaN. —There were also a fine Poussin, and Julio Romano, and a good modern by West. The Julio Romano was pr iced only 4001. but a Career/ was thrown in, as the Attie was very candidly admitted, or rather supposed to be, a duplicate original ; and therefore not perhaps of the very highest value, as some thought there was one like it in the Museum at Pan.. This Caracci was, however, only thrown in upon the understanding that there was to be found a dupli cate Julio in Europe. These pictures were, according to agreement, immediately handed over for sale by auction to Mr. Stanley, who took a very good oppor tunity of giving them a fair chance, for he fixed their sale upon the same day that he had to dispose of some fine genuine works of art, which did sell very high, one picture being sold for 1,3001. and another for 1,5001. N )t so, however the originals of Mr. Cresswell, for no bidder approached within anything like the estimated price of his pictures, and they were obliged to be bought in. After this disappointment they were sent for sale to Mr. Orenham, whir valued them, together with Mr. Woodburne, who was an excellent judge, at 8001. or 9001. and this valuation was nearly confirmed by their subsequent sale for about 1501. less than that amount. Of this amount not a farthing went into Mr. Creswell's pocket; for the person who negotiated the transaction was paid SUL for his commission. Lord Mil Justice 1I T.—Mao he an attorney? Mr. Serjeant Vatic's/an replied in the negative ; but there was a story of the attorney, for he charged Mr. Creswell 291. for his services, aod proceeded against 11, ~ , , him to outlawry for the recovery of it, although at th moment he so proceeded he knew very well where Mr. Cresswell was to be found. The relatives of the latter dying during these proceedings, the parties proceeded against him, and were taking out ejectments to serve upon tenants on the estates, which were in Surrey and Gloucestershire. In this situation, he applied to the Court of Chancery. for an injuncti , n, but tl•re he was stopped at once by a plea in bar—the outlawry. That, however, had since b-en set aside, and relief was now sought in this C9utt (Common Pleas), nut ct which the judgmenthad been originally sued, as having an equit able jurisdiction in the cause. Four of these pictures remained in Mr. Cresiwell's hands, and though these were given to him as worth 1,000/. there were affidavits from Mr. Christie and other comp..teut judges to chew that their value did not exceed 851. and that they were very bad copies. The present demand of the plaintiff against ' h e defendant was stated to he no less than 80001. The LOAD Cum, Juvtic■ inquired' whether the cause was still pending in the Court of Chaneory,and was informed in the negative. A rule nisi was then granted by the Court, but on the condition that no concurrent proceeding was pending in another Court. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Jitria 7. After hearing a few motions of no interest, the Court rose, and the CIIIEF BARON went to preside at tie quity side, whete a tithe cause was heard, in which the question at issue was whether underwn'id w..s t:thable. It was strongly contendei that by the Common Law it was, and that all the authorities and decisions supported that propositi in, unless where, by a particular custotn, it happened to be exempted. The Clair Baum said he should carefully look into the ease, and, if he found any difficulty in forming his opinion, he would constdt the other Judges of the Court. SHOCKING MURDER. Yesterday afternoon, at four o'clock, a Coroner's Inquest was held at the sign of the Black Horse, in Queen-street, Seven Dials, before Mr. STIRLING, the Cot oner for the County of Middlesex, on the body of Hannah Browne, an infant only three years of age, n ho Came by her death in the following dreadful mantle' : Thomas Bice deposed-1 am a cabinet-maker, and reside at No. 20, Queen -street, Seven Dials, the same house in which the deceased Child and her father lived. I knew the deceased very well ; she was the illegitimate child of Charles Browne, who keeps a coal shed in the lower part of the house. She would have been, as 1 understood, three years of age next October; 1 saw the child last, as well as I recollect, on Tuesday night, but I am sum I saw her on Wednesday (yesterday) morn ing, in perfect health ; she was a very fine healthy child. About ten minutes after nine o'clock this morning I was in my own workshop, which adjoins the shop of Charles Browne ; there is only a thin partition between, and I can hear almost every word spoken in Browne's shop. I heard 'Mts. Ann Browne, the wife of Charles Browne, but not the mother of the deceased, coming down stairs from the first fl or, which they occupied; she was calling out to her husband, " Charles, I have done it, I have cl.me it." 1 then opened my door, which looks into the passage, and saw Mrs. Browne, with her hands covered with blood, and calling cut, as before, " I have done it, I hive done it." IL-r husbind asked her what she had done, had she cut her finger? but she made no other reply Visa " I have done it. I have done it." I then ran upstairs, as did her husband also, and we entered, nearly at the same time, a small apartment on the first floor, where the deceased child was in the habit of sleeping in a little bed by itself. Chas. Bros ne, the father, exclaimed to me, 44 Oh! Price ! look at my child ! look at my baby !" I then saw the &ceased lying on the floor by the side of the red, and close by a wooden box, with its head almost severed from its body and one of its little fingers nearly cut otF ; and a third wound—as a stab near the collar hone in the lower part of the neck. I then saw Coatles Browne go to a sort of cistern, which was in the room for washing, and take out of it a large carving knife stained all over with blood; by this time Mrs. Browne came up stairs and entered the apartment, still calling out " I have done it." The husband clung round her neck, and they both sunk upon a sofa in the room, when he kissed her se veral times, at the same time exclaiming, " Oh, Anne, why did you do it? why did you kill my child?" ,but she made no reply, further than that she had done it. The floor, and the child's bed-gown and body, were saturated and covered with blood. By this time one of the beadl s of the parish, who was sent for, arrived, and took the woman, Mrs. Browne, away with him to the parish workhouse in custody. This I l witness, in continuation, said, that the father of the child is about 25 years of age, and his wife, Anne Browne, to whom he has been married about eight years, is about 60 years o!d now. She has no children by her husband. Tne deceased was a child that had been sworn to 'the husbaud. About 18 months ago, Mrs. , Browne persuaded him to bring the child home, rather than be paying the parish for its support. The child' had remained with them ever since, and M. s. Browne seemed do trngly fond of it. Her husband and she lied on very go >d tel rns, except occasioaally a little' bickering. Ste wax always a very steady, sedate, sober wonia.i, never drag':, or appeared intoxicated. CosONZA—Did you ever perceive any symptoms of derange ment about her. %Vitness—Never the slightest: quite the contrary. She was a very sensible woman ; after this act she seemed quite wild, but she soon became perfectly calm. 'l - he husband tore his hair, and seemed quite distracted, when lie saw the child dead. To another question, wit ness said, he could not tell whether or not the child was warm when he first saw it dead, for he did not feel it; he was so horror-struck that he could not go near it. The next witness was George Pond, one of the beadles of St. Giles's parish, who deposed that he was called in to the house No. 20, Queen -street, Seven Dials, about a quarter past nine o'clock that ms)rning, to take charge of a woman, who was said to ha►e committed murder. On entering the first room on the first A or, he saw Mrs. Browne sitting on a sofa, and her husband and another man holding her; the deceased child was then lying dead, with its throat cut from ear to ear. The next witness was Mr. Andrew Tweedle, surgeon to the Infirmary of St. Giles's parish, who deposed that he called in that morning to see the deceased child ; he Mond it quite dead, its throat cut from ear to ear, and the carotid artery completely divided; the child bad another slight cut below the longer gash, and a third, apparently a stab from a knife, stall lower dawn on the neck, near the collar bone; the child seemed to have struggled a little, and put up its hand to guard itself, for one of its fingers was nearly cut off. The deceased must have died instantly. Another Surgeon gave similar testimony to the last witness. Samuel Foramen, roundhouse keeper, and constable of St. Giles's parish, deposed, that he went, in conse quence of information be received of a murder having been committed that morning, to the house, 20, in Qireee-street, and there saw the deceised lying dead on a table; he then proceeded to the parish workhou,e, where he sa'w Mrs. Ann Browne. She appeased then quite ch.ranged, from her look and manner ; he under. stood that a strait waistcoat was about to be pot on her, bat she soon became calmer; and in about twu hours after, when he wai conveying tpr to Nlarlbor , u4h rtreet Police.office, the was quite calm and collected. She told him, while conveying her along in the coach, that she knew not what urged her to commit the act; she saw the child asleep in and, without knowing w hat she was doing at the time, she turned it round on the side of the bed, and taking up a knife, sire beli.ved a carving -knife, that lay on the table, she cut the vor child's head off, quite uncontci , irs at what she did at the time. Witness asked het s% hat on earth could have been in her mind, to urge her to so shocking a deed? She said she could not tell ; there was one thing, she said, preyed a great deal on her mind, whi,-11 was, that a woman named Martha Evaline, by whom her husband had tl:e last Wegitimate child, was constantly' coming to the house. creating a ri t and m ih, and irisilting her benever she saw her ; and a neighbour urged this woman on to do so. Ti•e knife wai now proluced to the Jury ; it is a large c u yi.ig knife, nearly new, very sharp-edged and pointed, about fifteen inches long, and having a black handle ; the blade, about ten inches long, was quite stained with blood. The sight of this frightful weapon shocked every one present. The Jury now proceeded across the street to the house where the child lay dead, neatly opposite, to take a view of the body, which presented a most appalling spectacle; and after returning to the Jury-room, The CORONER addressed a few words to them, re pressing his regret that there appeared nothing to show that the woman was in a deranged state of mind at the time of committing the horrid deed, or previ,usly; for it was scarcely to be conceived how any human being could perpetrate such an act in a sane state of mind.— As the case stood, however, it appeared to be a foul murder. The women gave a systematic detail of the manner in which she perpetrated the act, and although she was immediately after in a state of sanitation—and what being nn earth must nor, after such a deed?—yet she soon returned to her habitual calmness. It mould, however, be. fur the Jury to consider the case, and return their verdict. The Jury consulted for a few minutes, and returned a verdict of 4, Wilful Slurderagainst Ann Browne," and the Coroner issued his warrant for her committal to Newgate. THE LATE MURDER NEAR MANCIIESIER. When the M.Keanels were taken to Lancaster Ca.tle, on reaching their apartment, they immediately asked for Bibles, as if the very sight of the precious volume could relieve the dreadful angui,h they endured. When the officer came to knock off their chains, soon after their arrival, which took place at half past ten o'clock, they were both intently poring over the Scriptures : apparently unconscious of what was passing around them. Some one asked, . 4 which is Al. xander r when Alexander, looking up, meekly replied, lam he." BOth of them preset ved the strictest silence ; in fact, they appeared as if they fancied the very sound of their voices would call down curses upon them. The clothes they were taken 4n, and which they then wore, as far as could be judged, were those in which they committed the bloody deed ; but they had evidently been washed. They told Mr. Lavender they were Scotchmen, and , not Irish, nor of Irish parents. They said their father, who had been dead sixteen years, was a Galloway,man, and that their mother was born in Dumfries—that they had two brothers, William and John, older di in them selves, and a sister—that William lived in the parish of Urr, right or nine miles from Dumfries, ani John in Staffirdshiie. They said, too, they left Manchever on Thursday night ; so that immediately after the com mission of the murder, they must have set off to Man chester, and secreted themselves in the house of Elizabeth M 4 Conaell, in Collier -street, Salford—a woman with whom Michael used to live, and by whom she bad recently a child. The abode of this woman, which was anxiously sought for by the police officers,was discovered through the unremitting exertions of Mr. Foulkes and Mr. Norreys, and on Monday last, she was taken to the New Bailey, and now remains there in the hospital : but she will be liberated when she de.ires it. DUMFRIES, JUNE 6.—As.snme of the English Papers are ascrding to Dumfries-shire the discredit of having given birth to Alexander and Michael M'Keaid, the a rocious perpetrators of one of the most shocking murders that ever was committed in modern times, it becomes our duty to contraJict the fact. The culprits are not only of Irish extraction, but were born, if not bred, in the sister country. It is true they resided four years in a parish in Galloway ; but they %sere rather shunned, we understand, than respected. Mr. Missuutt. wished to know the cause of the quarrel. Burdy begged to be excused stating how it origniated, beCausc it would expose family matters. Mr. Lynch exclaimed that he might state all he could say, with out any delicacy towards him. /lardy stared, that about ten o'clock on Tuesday night, Mr. Lynch cams to him in the parlour, and said that a printer, who was suspected to be too intimate with Mrs. Lynch, was up stairs with her, and Lynch asked him, " Now, what would you do under sirni tar circumstances?" He replied," Why, if I were yeti, I would go op stairs and pitch the fellow out of the window." Mr. blissisett—You told him so? Burdy—i did. Mr. 1 4 ynch—You denied a few minutes ago having called my wife a this is a kind of halt admission that you did; and I served you rightly. Mr. MIIIIIMLL said that he should insist upon Mr. Lynch Audis( good bad to answer the charge at the Sessions, viz. hiinselt in the sum of 1001. and two sureties in 501. each. _ _ He put in the bail in the course of the day, and was liberated. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Yesterday this °lke and every avenue leading to it were crowded ' beyond aH precedent since the investigation of the late Mr. Paula leroy's case, in consequence of the expected examination o f a wo man namecidnue Browne, charged with the murder of her husband's illegitimate child, by severing its bead from the body with a carv ing knife. The particulars of the case will be found in the report of the Coroner 'a Inquest, in another column. While standing at the bar she seemed quite calm and collected ; and when asked if she wished man any thing, en bearing the state ment of the case against her, she replied that she knew not what bad urged her to the deed. She saw the child asleep on the bed, and she turned its head round over the side of the bee and cut it of, but she was now seriously sorry for what site bad done. The . prisoner was remanded until Saturday next. An elopement from this town took place on Saturday night : the Gentleman is not the first of the name whose vagaries have come before the public; the Lady will, we dare say, confess without regret that she is no longer y ong.—Bury Post. The Worthy Tobacconist who has started for the Borough of Southwark promises, if elected, to give the Electors a QUID pro quo. Monday night, a wan, for a wager of a sovereign, sat on the lamp iron of tie Angel Inn, from nine o'clock, r.u. until seven o'clock, AN. on Tuesday._ Bury Gazette. FATAL ACCIDENT. An inquest was held at seve.i o'clock yesterday even ing before THOMAS SHELTON, Esq. Coroner, at the Board• Room of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, to inquire into the death of a youth named Charles Hare, who was crushed to death at tht execution in the Old Bailey, yesterday morning. Henry Brown stated that he was going through the Old Bailey about seven o'clock yester day morning, a great crowd had assembled, and he fol lowed a coal waggon, which was going towards Lud gate-hill, and as another waggon was coming in the con trary direction, it stopped a short distance from the scaffold whereon the execution took place. Upon the waggon again moving forward, the driver desired the people to take care, but directly after witness heard a scream, and saw the deceased fixed against a post by the hind wheel of the waggon, which was instantly hacked, and the deceased fell, and was carried away by smne of the crowd. The driver was at the head of his team, and walked very slowly. James Buckley,*a wea ver, was waiting to see the execution, and gave the same account as the last witness. Joseph Mat tin, one of the city police, deposed, that he was stationed within the railing around the scaffold ; the waggon was traversing at a very slow pace indeed ; the persons in the crowd would not move when the wheels were passing close to them, being afraid of losing their places, and actually stood within the waggon wheels; bad the deceased moved, no accident would have happened. A juror asked if the thoroughfare for carriages was not stopped on the morning of executions. Martin replied, always at seven o'clock ; bat upon this occasion the crowd was unusually great. A juror said the passage should be always stopped on the scaffold being brought out. It was miracle that more lives were not lost. Another witness deposed to the same facts, and completely exonerated the waggoner from blame, observing, the moment that, Di ED. j The 31st ult. at Battersea, at the age of 74, Lady Elisabeth Pratt, daughter Oche late and deter of the present Lord Camden. At Sierra Leone, on the 14th of March last, Lieutenant D. Robertson, of the Royal Africa. Corps. The 29th of December, of the Amean fever, on board the Susan transport, in his passage from Arracan, aged 23 years, George M. S - Robe, Lieutenant and Adjutant of the East India Company's :27t1L Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry. the unfortunate youth's h,:cly had been removed, sever:i ' persons took up the same position. Mr. Josephs, sop. peon of the Hospital, proved that the deceased lived about two hours after being brought into the Hospit a l, Upon the examination of his body after death, the lung s were found injured, and a great quantity of blood L is infused into them. The left lung was much lacerated, His ribs had been broken and pressed inwards. The injuries caused his death. He was sensible a short tim e before !is death. The Jury, after a few moment" cf m • si.'eration, recut ned a verdict of.-1-" Accidental Death" —Deodand Is.; and hoped that in future vehicles would be Frevented passing through the Old B.siley until sfe the ex, cution and removal of the scaffold. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDIHALL• A person applied to be sworn to an affidavit, to the effect his wife, when he married her, was not a spinster. but a widow The cause of his applying to be so sworn was, that by the custom of Mahlon, a party marrying a freeman's daughter became entitled to the freedom of that Borough. lie had married a freematfl daughter; but on applying fur a certificate of his marriage. he foui.d his wife had been entered on the register book as a spinster love id of a widow, and the Minister would now rectify this mis. take previously to making out the certifizate, upon sigh: 01 the a. &lava he tendered.—Mr. Payne, the Clerk { said, be did not er,sl,t that any Minister would take the responsibility of altering re f .. /4 book. T.) change spinster into widow, and vice cella% might ti,, c the eltret of bastardizing legitimate children, or kgitantati.ia g natural ones; and a person swearing a voluntary affidavit, such as this was, it not being made in a judicial proceeding, could nut be indicted for perjury if the matter was untrue. Toe Alderman de. cfined permitting the affidavit to be sworn. BOW-STREET. Yesterday evening, at half-past seven o'clock, as we have already stated, was appointed for the re-ezaminatiou of Mr. Celia, the man charged with obtaining 17001. front Colonel Catuac, late of toe Guards ; and considerably before the time fitted upon a gent number of persons, seemingly of respectability, presented thernselsi at the door, and evinced great eagerntss to obtain admission :II ri m Office. hut, in consequence of no witnesses appearing iu thm case, Mr. Nlissnutt called Collins forward, and intormed him that no witnesses Laving appeared against him, be pronounced him to he discharged. Collins bowed, and retired without saying a word. JEALOUSY AND ASSAULZ—Mr. Lysol;4, a well drrs•rd vo t ing m a n, the landlord of the Ctooked Billet 'favern, corner of Wych street, St. Clement's Church-yard, Strand, who is the son (as he stated) of a Banker of Tunbridge, was charged with commuting a desperate assault on the person of a man named Burdy, a compositor. Burdy, and two young men of the same profession, gave evidence to the following effect : They were drinking in Mr. Lynch's parlour on Tuesday night, about the hour of ten o'clock, and some worth arose about a com positor, who was accmed of being too intim Ite with a female re siding in the house, and related to Mr. Lyi:ch. In the course of thefraens, Mr. Lynch ordered Burdy to quit the house. He re. fused till he had finished his liquor, and Lynch seized a poker and struck him on the head a violent blow. The persona present inter. feted, and prevented Lynch front repeating the blow, and wrested the poker from his grasp. Lynch went into his bar, and returned lin a very infuriated state, with an instrument in his band, when 1 the witnesses described as a dirk or long case knife, with which he made a lunge at Burdy, and but for the prompt interference of the printers, and some coal•heavers who were fetched out of the tap. room, he would have plunged it into Burdy. Mr. Lynch stated, that he was justified in what he had done, and I he should do the like again under similar circumstances. He should not have assaulted Burdy, had be not called his (Lynch'a) wife a w--e.—Burdy declared in the most solemn manner, that be did not apply any epithet whatever to Mrs. Lynch ; and if he had called her by such a name, he should have deserved the treatment he had met with. BIRTHS. On the 6tl instant, Mrs. M. Tatham, of Torrington-square, of a daughter. The Ist instant, at his Lordship's house in Pall-mall, the Counteu of Mount Charles, of a daughter. At Sannyside, near Montrose, on the 31st ult. the Lady of Capt. Hunter, of a son. MARRIED. On the 6th instant, at St. Luke's, Chelsea, William Michael Toliner, Esq. of Sloaoe-street, to Georgian Wastes, youngest daughter of Josh. Mazzingbi, Esq. of Cedugan-place. Duna Waterford au.rose Gottenburgh Malta Holland 1/~ILS -THIS DAY: AIL DM 1 0 1 0 •Rt. DUL 1 0 1 0 1 0 O 1 O 0 Prance Ilarributilb Flanders Brasil America Lenard Islands 0 0 Buenos Ayres 0 0 'r glut Jersey 0 0 O 1 1 0 o 0 O 0 HIGN-WATRIt at LONDON-BRIDGE TO-MORROW. blaming . 17 minutes after 4 . Afternoon . . 35 minutes after 4 Lox Dow: Printed and Publishedbi 1. F. K [AIX at th e ST*l Otrior, N. 1, Temple , Bar.