Star. — London, England, 1801-03-05 00:00:00

L.IW E . IG cot:RT !Sr NCL!. MAP I! 4 FARL OF SI. VIS,L>.T D. 1 1:(. 1•1 R. I . Jet,vis opcin.d tl;s tinni Ivilich it apvt.p.o.i, th3t 11. k ,:01 fin - •loneyl , :n.l and i - cec;rz.t tilt I'Luut u: Mr. Efts star flaltcd :Id10:1 b:.01 .; !il die Earl ‘4 . S:. Viii.:eet Mr. wlio is a Priec-kcat. in or,ler to reco-cr ti. to him a Mtn of money which he received, and u Lich he (Mr. E. i apprehended was recessed for the ..f the Noble hail (the PlaiutilT). The only de fence Mr. Tacl.t.r could was, that he retain ed that runt of money in his hands,. filbj...!i to lonic faperior claim. He 11.1 d :rliood that Lord NA- Gm cent:rled th::t he ote i ;lit zi, receive front M t . I,k,:r wai demanded of him by that ac tton. Lord Keith alfh etnecived that he bad a titre to this looney, !le did not that day mean to entOtce hi, claim. If the serdia of the Jnry lhottld be in favour of the Noble Earl, it would not operate as a bar a:_t•iiialt thofe two Noble Commanders. The perfons interelled were all of the 11; - ..theft reputation. and wboti: names and cha rade: s 'nod 'ever rcmain dear to England. They were alio tliends to one another; and this coutro serf: was by no means of a pecuniary nature, but arofe out of the different opinions that had been entertained o:t the fithjeet, as to the cullom of the ler. vier. In the month of Oftober, 1795, the Noble Earl Vll5 appointed Commander its Chief of his Ma:lair's fleet on the Mediterranean lotion, and foon afterwards, etc limits rf his coin:nand were eziensied alon%; the coatis of Spain and Portugal to Capi Tiniiierre, and the Noble Earl continued in that corturand till November :6,1799. On the 7 Id. of March, in that year. and therefdre during the exigence of the Noble Earl's command, he fent orders to Captain Digby, of the Alcmene fri gate, to end ze on C* North Coal! of Spain. Capt. Digby actually did cruize under thofe orders, When he took two Spann fhips of great value, which were afterwards libelled and condemned in the Court of Admiralty ; and the itioeftion for the tonfideration of the Airy was—Whether captain Digby, having taken there two prizes within the limits of the Moditerranean gamin over which the. Noble Earl prefided—Captain Digby having gone on this cruize under there orders—laving continued under there orders utwevoked and Mire pealed—and even if the Noble Earl had returned to this country, and Captain Digby had received his orders from the Senior Officer left on the Ra tion—the queflion was, whether the Noble Earl was not entitled to his &arc? It was perfatly known to every body, that all prizes taken in the war—that all the property of enemies taken in war, belonged to the King, jure enrolee. But for the benefit of the fervice, and fir the encouragement of the Navy, which had long been the pride, the ornament, and glory of Britain, his hi:hefty had condefeended, by different Atli of Parliament, to divert hiinfelf of the right to this property. And therefore, generally, at the beginning of every war, there was a Prize Ad palled for dint pur. 'sae, and a Royal Proclamation. In confequence of thofe, all property of that kind—all prizes, were divided among the different ranks of the Navy— in fuels proportions as his Majefly thought fit to dire.% It was quite clear there were but two ways in which any perfon could be entitled to prize-money. Seamen and inferior Officers muff be on board the Ihip who took the prize, or they mug be in tight at the time the prize was taken, aid Troia be cernfiruEtively aiding and afflititsg.— But the Superior Officers of his Majefty's Nary were entitled en prize-money, not in confequence of their aßnal pretence, am in confequence of that confirtiaive aid, bet in confequence of' the pri:cs Seing tnkea under the immediate direftions and orders aic.l fn the °Ricers who took them, or by virtue of their farrintending authority, by their cornroaild, and within their station, under whore orders the prizes were taken. It was not neceffary, not had it ever been held, that the Ad miral commanding on any Ration fhould with hi. own hand iffue the order under which the prizes were taken ; hot it was futlicient if the orders were ilfued by any tvrfon under his controul and authority. Tice euettion arofe under theft eirctun. fiances :—Tlie Earl of St. Vincent had devoted his time and talents fo notch to his country, as to everp'twer>tis crnrftitution by his unremitting for. vices, infomach that it became neceffary to apply for laave of alifence to the Admiralty, who, on the ad of n.vvmber, *7A wrote a letter to the Noble Ear), informing him they complied with his regneft. and dented him to give to the next Senior Officer who, in his alifepee, was to command the fleet, fhci in!truttions as lie might judge neeellary. The Nni"c Earl renstinued on his Ration a crnfo derals'.e time after th it period, giving orders to the different fnips under his command. At laft he failed for k.ngland in his Majefly's fliip Argo, with his flag flying as Commander in Chief. Upon his arrival, it Wel4aLihlittely neeeffary for the Noble Earl to apply to the Admiralty even before he could come out of his fhip. While Mr. ERSSINI was proceeding, The AT TORN It Y F Nrlt A L interfered, and raid. he appeared for Lord Nc!fen. Lord Keith did not appear by any Count' . And if his Friend stc.uld come to Inch achniffioas n , wou ld e n a ble him to try the quellion, Le litot;!,! give hint re trouble, as he und. rainod thrre was then no defence. Lord KENYON fait—" would take care to pay the moiler into the iitia hand,in cafe it might Lr el:timed fontehody chi. His Lordfhip ?aid, th:y would prove di: Diendant had received the money, and that !he prizes vet re taken within the roper latitudes." Captain Digby proved that II: had emitted Urt• t ti:7 the orders of the Earl of St. 's'incetw, and, that during that •rei er fie lint; captured the Spa bith frigates the F.i Thetis end S;nttet Ertl& mat I Ferrol, on the 15th and f 7th of Geinbcr 1799. 18 appeared that Noble flare. to etrry.• Matofer in Chi-I, amounted to 96711. Ss. and rh G..ttsenn ta of :117 !toy, ceder the direction of the 6.13 Cur, r jr-7:r:, f•on,l a Verdict far him to ree. anaciaut.--Vetlet for Phisistiir 0711.11,.; couRT or COMMON PLEAS, ELLRUARY 22 DOE ex ektn. m. S(T SON. This was an ation to provc val;dit y ui purportin.2-, tobe the latt Will and Totament of Nirs. Mary itobinfon, la::: of Itomruid, in the Connty !tick. PnSPD 011CrCi Elle r:!fe, and bfrrved that the prelon was one of the grolkii impofitions that had ever come before the public. The Tellatrix was a Lady at the advanced age of 76, polreffing contiderable property, both landed and funded, who had become the dupe of a confidential fervant and her connections, and by whole arts the had been made to tign a will, fhut tMg out her heirs from the participation of her property, and in their room bequeathing it to this tc.rvant and her then lover, the preknt defendant. The way this was effeded, was by making the deceafed intoxicated, and in the. moments of men tal imbecility, guided her hand in affixing her tignature to an intimment the was wholly uncon felons of.—This tranfaelion took place in the year 17rt5, and the tefiatrix did not die till the year 1789, during which time no mention was ever made of the will, nor perhaps would the affair have been known at this moment, bat for the fortunate circumflance of one of the relatives of the deceafed meetig by accident with the atteflingwitnefs to the will, a fervant lad of the defendant's, who had been turned out of his employ ; and from whole anfwers to interrogatories put to him, the fabrication was difcovered. _ _ The bill was then produced and read, in which a perfon of the name of Staines, the tellatrix's heir, was cut off with a Chilling; and the defendant Stevcnfun made refiduary legatee, after certain legacies thould be paid. One of thefe legacies was that of zoo'. to a perfon for whom it was known thed eccafed had greataffeftion,and another was of 4001. to Betty Bodkin, the fervant allud ed to, betides zol. to another fervent in the fami ly, and mourning rings to various of the deceafed's acquaintance. The fubfcribing witneffes were Meas. Gale and Reynolds, an Attorney and his Clerk, lance dead. _ The principal evidence called was a young man of the name of Cooperfon, who fated, that in the year t7SS, he lived se kb the defendant and his mother, who kept an orange ware-houfe, and that one afternoon, about four o'clock, hi was told he muff go immediately in a poll-chaife to Romford ; svitnefs faid, he mull flop to put on a clean thin, [nit was defiriti not, with the remark that if be went inftantly, it might be a shirt or two in his way. %Violets then fet off, and arrived at the White Hart Inn, Romford, where he found his matter. At twelve o'clock at night he was coo- dueted to the houfe of the teftatrix, and led into a room where Mrs. Robinfon was fitting, appa rently much enfeebled, and fcarcely able to hold herfelf up; that Betty Bodkin was alto prefent, that the two firtt fhects of the will had been figned when he entered the room, and the third Mrs. Robinfon was in the aEt of figning ; that the made one or two attempts to write, but could not, till her hand was guided, and the fignature effeEted in the witne's's pretence. That on his return to Lon don, as he was going up !lairs to bed, Mrs. Ste venfon called out to him, and Paid, Is the tnifi nels done I" Witnefs replied Yes Madam:" on hich Mrs. S. exclaimed, o Then the will is fi uithed." Witnefs after this had four shirts given to him as a prefent for his fervices. Mr. Andrews, an apothecary at Romford, knew the deceafcd for many years, and attended her in her lalt illnefs ; was afturecl that in the year tylls, Mrs. Robinfon enjoyed a good fate of health, and that nothing at that time, nor from that pe riod till her death, did he know of her having made a fccond will ; he underftood the had made one about two years before, but further he had no knowledge. That on the day the died he called, at the houfe about twelve o'clock, and tithed Betty how her nihirefs was the replied the had fallen into a doze, and lay qnite fill ; the witnefs laid he would call again, if that was the cafe ; in about two hours after he did Cu, when Betty again Ctiot her millrefs was fleeping ; the witnefs then inti:ted on feting his patient, and on going into the bed-room, found Mrs. Robinfon was dead, and had bevy laid out; from all appearances he fuppofed Ille might have died prevroully to his calling the fiat time. The witncfs told Betty that her eionoluS was csceedingly Itrange; when the re plied, that it was her nuftrefs's requeft her death might not be known till fomc time after her deceafe. The Rev. Mr. Strachan deputed thatehe had been a fubfcribing witnefs to a will made about two years before the one in queftion, and that he had never heard of any other, though he had been in the confidence of the deceafcd up to her death. The defence let up was, that Mrs. Robinfini had qu orrelled with her relations, and was determined to cut them off ti out any benefits they might re ceive from her fortune; that the was a woman in no WAYS Given to drink, and that her weakncfs was wholly occafioned by illnefs ; that the will was her own ael and deed, and that the had, on all occafinns, 'poke with the greatett affeaion of Betty Welkin, infomuch that the people of Rom , Ble e d, nick-named her Betty All I alluding to the ' general opinion that the would come in for all Mrs. Rohinfotr's property at her death. Mr. icrjeant Sit rrat RD made an able reply to the defenee, ohfcrvin:, that the only queftion for the Jury was, whether the pretint initrument was or was !lilt the ss ill of Its. Mary Robinfon Af ter much argtimar, , drawn from the evidence, to prove the fraud, Mi. SHEPHERD was proceeding, when one at the Jurymen interrupted him, and (listened, they were latisfied in their minds.—Vcr dift los plaintiffs. MARCH 1:-•LIVY1.. caoss. ' This was an alias to 'recover damages for a br4..ich of cootraa under the foll'inein circum -11 Ances :—The Defenthint 'oven:toted by one of • his agents retiding in Micily, to confign to the T a lame quantity of rags. and inland them the port of I Arojon Jly and in good condition. The veal cootain.ag the goods arrived in the Medway. and there, as having come front the Me- ARCM" was immediately fubjetted tai the law viquanatias. The maker of the veal judging it moll. convenient for himfelf, as wrll as moft ad vantageous tOr the owners, determined to tend the nods up the River in :t lighter, to Le delivered to ;he Plaintill in London. On itifPedion they were haled to be much dainaged, and on fate a great part for a very inferior price. The Plaintiff rdifit;iy brought his action to recover, and fi!Lianti , ted his cafe by feveral witnelles. On the part of the Defendant it W:ls attempted to be proved that though the goods on delivery were fo.n. what damay,ed, this arole horn no negligence on his pat t, and that the damage %vas incr.:aced by the delay on the part of the Plaintiff, in ordering the delivery. Veritia for the Plaintiff, 2521. MARCiI 3. —PARKER D. PASS. This was an ac ion to recover damages from the Defendant for an infringement of a patent obtain ed for the !Tant:. and of cement :r mor tar, prepared in' fucli a manner as to loaf& greater hardncfs and durability than any form .rly in ufe. The fpecilication dated, that this cement was lobe formed of moduks of clay, or, in other words, of !tones partly calcarious and partly ar gillacious in their nature, and pointed out the manner in which this lubflance vois to be prepar ed, fo as to produce the defined effcft. A Gentleman who had paid a confiderable at tention to fubjeas of chymitlry and natural pilau. fophy, was firft called on behalf of the Plaintiff, and his tvidencc went to ellablifh the clearnefs of the terms of the Ipecification, the novelty of the invention, and its great excellence and utility. A number of other Witneffes in the various trades where this 11114i:ince is tired were nett called, and their teflimony was clear and explicit as to its being altogether unknown to them prior to the granting of the patent, and of its high value in the courfe of their bufinefs. The fa& of the in fringement was alto proved. On the part of the Defendant. it was attempted to be proved that a fimilar invention had been pradlifed in remote parts of the country, almoti forty years ago ; hut the evidenceofthis fa& did not kern to befatisfato ry. It was fartherendeavotnved to be (hewn that the Reines mentioned in the fpecileation were known and did in different manufaories before the patent was obtained ; but though it was }hewn that there was a great fitnilarity, their complete identity was not clearly efiablifhed. Dr. Babington and other medical gentlemen gave a fcienutic account of the feveral fithilances prefented to them.—After a very excellent charge from Lord ELDORI, the jury found for the Plaintii. MARCH 4.--:TOCLENC 1150 (.0. V. CLAY. This action was coniiderably complicated, and occupied the attention of the Court for a very long period. Without cnteting into all the mi nute details of the cafe, we Iliad confine ourklves wholly to the points on which the verdift turned. The declaration confided of three counts, in the two firß of which, the Dehndant was charged with refuting to :dlow the Plaintiffs, by their agent, to remove forty-fix hogtheads of tobacco out ofi ware-houfe belonp,int to his Majcily, and with transferring these goods to other perfons while the Plaintiffs' lien upon diem continued. A third count charged the Defendant with trover and convection of the goods in Talbott. It ap. peered that the Plaintiffs, who are Swedes, were owners• of a fhip, called the Ftatuna; that the Captain of the fhip entered into a chatter party i . or a certain fun with a Mr. Tupper, either the part ner or agent of Mingay and Son, of the ifland of Guernfey, to go on avoyage bay.ixt Guerialey and Norfolk-Bland, and to bring back a cargo of have. and tobacco, and that 61. per day was to he al lowed after the running days were expired. The ihipretumed in August, 1799, and on its arrival was prevented from landing the cargo by an or der of Batt, which was then in force. A variety of applications were made to :sfr. Tu N ier re fpec * -, tins the delay of the fhip, all of winch proved fruttlefs • the Captain .at sailed for London. hawing the bill of lading. as far as concerned theft: hogfheads of tobacco, indorfed to Meifrs. Lamb and Younger, merchants of time eminence, to whom they were contigned. The agent of the Plaintiffs, previous to the time that the goods were depofited in the warehonfe of which the De fendant had the charge, informed him of the ell-- cumftance that they would be there placed, and feveral times afterwards reprefented that the Plaintiffs had a lien on the goods till the freight, and a turn for demurrage, was advanced. The goods were however transferred to Mt:firs. Lamb and Younger, by the Defendant, and under theft circumstances the anion being brought, the pre- ceding ftatement was fubflantiated by the tellimony of the Plaintiffs' witneffes, who farther explained the character in which the Defendant (lands as warchoufeman to tranfad butinels betwixt the different merchants. The Defendant's Counfcl, Mr. Scijcant BEST, took feveral objeCtions in point of law to the aft ion, which were referved by Lord ELDON for the opinion of the Court, though his Lordship Was not inclined to think any of them of mlich weight. It was contended farther, on be half of the Defendant, that he had from his lima tion no fpecific power to deliver op thcfe goods-- that an order for their transference had been given by the C.ommillioners of Cullom., and that it was incompetent for him to difishey this order. In order to invalidate the count in trover, it was pros,- el that the goods at this time were Ilill in the fitme warelioufe when they were depofited. Lord F.i.nosi took a very comprehenfive view of the whole law of the cafe, and laid it down clear ly, that according to the Tobacco :la the Defen dant had no right, under the cireunillances (f the cafe, to refore to deliver the goods to the agent of the Plaintiffs, or to transfer them to any other peckin, even under the orders of the Commit= honer: of Calms, without dill biting to them the manner in which they were &poked. His Lord fhip then adverted to tire circumfiances which had , induced the matter of the flap to proceed to Lon don, end Rated the reafons which induced 1::m to think that demurrage for the delay of the landing ~f the roods, as *at as the charge: attendant on :his delay, fhould be granted. The Jury, without fothid A vdtclia for app. freight from Norfolk to Gnentfri, Et): roe. freight from Camitrey to London • and the other thattes were ldt tv be **kid br the fbetatn of the jog: AIRTIis: Oa V. cdacflav, of a dat , t;.:Jl, 11.-• I ;.ly of William 4.! Ems. 14 On at Y: •kitana kyL, the L.. 4,1 Henry Bed, Etc. of s the wifc of Michae. Efq. of Guildfor.Wrrect, of a tlatttitter, "I Y. , ..,ay o! Ckari!, I.a Ina. ct, yth LI!. at Guenock, Alta. ii wik or . Bt: 4: trerchAnt th , te, n; a tl'.o t: if: tlx Rcv. I ,: 1, of a dalter-t. IIIARRIFD! t Cottage, county of Wdt.J , l.i.it7, 7..::07.1, of D a r,- to 1\ !ifs 7, dAnth!,r jr.!:n r•: c: l'!! , !;!acr. Lrt at the Ce , ll.:,iitzeM7a..!. 1.! . rflayn r Air. Drummond, Atturcy • sorr7,t davrhter ut Mr. L.... , ret‘, La,v; F ...;ridli . httun, Capt. W. Gr;:enara.. 1,314 c 2 that plata. _ At V , lfeburn, Lice.cl : to Sc-'.. Th. .”1".o•., I , :cot:d daugt - tzr uf humploa, I.q. v fro: Cr)l'....gi?..e R CI - Arles 01. T, Fr:l. tr. I .rk!..r,t, frxr.n. 1 drroshter of are krte Ng. of 11 iliow-11,1i, York Lore. . . .lt onti,t t.tth ult. Nlr. livid I.lfler,yr.ttr Mr.-Fa:lc of W, II cr the t Tth ult. Air. Geo, e Dttdr ;nia,ntrachan:;Edinbure. t.. M .r: ; of IVetttnorel.inc!. At W.. 11. NirLy, CLefbire, Mr. Hale, of Crealy,., WA:::inecvt., (rut Meals, both in that county. DILL). ru,:ftlay mosning, of the drogy, Mr. 211. jackfon, Groan of the Cluspel 11 , ..r.1, St. James's. Sunday n mlr.g, at hit houfe In Pimlico, AI:. John Luke, r feasverer iu his Istajciti't kitchen. . _ _ At Montego nay, the tc.th of (Ydoleer laft, eleorge Coulon. Erg. of Kenmore, county of Cornwan, Jz.maica. Lan Thurfday, aged at, of :ht. gout in his head, after Ova days inelifpuntion, William Hartley Curter, lifq. Gentleman Comment r of hisgdalen C6llrge, Onferd, and fezond fin of the Rev. Bounden, of Glednout Houle, Yorkthire. Thurftlay lan., at Hampton, the Hon. Juliana Bryan, wife et Miami Bryan, FA. and filter to the Eau! of Shrewnony. Saturday evening loft, at Bri:htoo, Francis Biddulpit, of Cheri::: Crofs, Banker. On Wednefday Wooten, Mr. George Warbriek, merchant. Liverpool. On the ICtit ult. aced a years, Mn. Poore, Lady of Edw. Poore, Efti. of Wrft-cad Cottage, Hens, and of RuLttl;,Wib t . and daughter of Ccorgc Wolff, Efti. Datil& Conful Her dcalt waa occalinned by a fall front a carriage. . •_ ctt WednettLy latt, at Sydenbam, lent, after a fry, dart Uinta, Mr. Jukn Coate, late at 'fauittuek•ltrcet, Cover , garden. . _ _ At Edinburgh, on Wednefday the asth ult. Mr. MlMint Prater, fecund fon of the Hun. Archibald Frofer, of Lavat. On the 'nth ult. William Ker, EN. of Itroa-Intadows. At her bode, James's Cour% ZOnburgh. on the azft Mrs. Jolit.itune. On Tudd.t Lit, of a deenne, N'fift Knight, only daughtir of Mr. Richard Bright, grout. 9. Gracechurch-ttn:r. Oa Tuef.Jay I rreft - o ! , , TwickalhAT, “Chfre Pre. EP!. eicevcr.:Jdgo, if. 111011 LONDON-BRIDGE 10 MORROW. Murnr. 2 minutes after 5 A.f:er , rwri - 57 rainutt s after ROYAL I-ORK 1101 IL, JAVARNE relpeelfullv iniorms.the Nubility ar.d • Gentry, retorting. ta Clifion and the Hotwidb, that he i,se t tken and nearly fttcd lip for their Iteceptior,the abuca Hula. Neat Pot Coaches, (li•Ofri, and Sodr.bles. • Balls every Tue{day Fortnight. PARTICULARI.Y RECOMNIENDED m the LAMES. A S there tire Complaints peculiar, to tlle FA:It Sex, alto?• thee unknown to men, and of ton delicate a nature to be mentioned through the me dium of public pm. c, .owl which requirc, in different periods and iitnationa, die mat ' tkaial tr.edical offillance to complete the original delign of the nnd omnipotent AVVIOR of the Uniirerfe—To the therefore, and efperially to thufe In what la underftuod by the tap.* e li ft , this Nervous Cordial is mat admirably ut.ptsil, and capable of adminillering all thole great and in. citimabla beni.fit,; and to thole in the earlier Rages of life, it will :anion the carious Difordcrs that Ladies are fubjedt to, an.l ib particular rettnre 101 l colour, and give a fine clear Can. pl.rion, and alto a fweetnets and parity to the Brook. A GUIDE TO bLli AGE. TI c Maiming reception which this work her experienced, bail indw .31 the Dodor to polalloi the two volumes in ore at a re dread price, fo as to bring it within the reach of • more enlarged drsk or readers. When a look has run throngh a rant nines. her n. editions, when the fait is rapid, when it is fought with Avidity, heal acknowledged to be read with ,profit, Ode are fo many' Wm:mill:4 ;Toot's of its utility; to the& proofs, then, the GUIDE to OLD AGE may lay daim, as this Is the Fort.- ninth Edition of this Publication; a publication that cannot into the hands of any reader, of any climate, age, fez, eon' du hill ' ma rricdor fingle, that may not derive advantage from t he perufsl of it, and particidarly to rearming men on long voyages, if Inclined to prrfcrve or recover health, or to avoid ti.c in.:Ac cretions of youth, or the faber talks of mattrar age. This imps-eon will be found to contain tome chkrvations, the osniflion of which would be unpardonable in a work of this kind, which, out of delicacy, cannot even be named in &public print. The high eftimation in which this work Is held by the public, its great utility, and the imprecedented Lie &this nut with, is fully proved by the fog/owing wit in:ay: I hereby certify, that I have pranced THIRTY THOU SAND of Dr. BRODUM's GUIDE to OLD AGE, Bum sat brft putlication. J. W. NITERS, Printer." The naI'ANICAL SYRUP and NERVOUS CORDIAL, to he had et the Dodoes Houle, No. 9, Albion-Brett, fee , it doors from the Leverian /*Ankara, Blaeldriars Bridge, in Bot ft.-. it 22.. I IS. 6d. and 51. 6d.; in Bath, Crottwell, Exeter, Truenian and Son, Shrmard, Gofport, Harding Brightnss, Muskrat' and Co. Glasgow, Baxter, Birmingham, Swinney, Ipfwich. Misidlediteh, Bedford, Syni;h, 10e of Wi-ht, Albin, Blandloid, Sinunons, ' Irwibe, Youn;.„ m.seliant. Bury it. Edmund's, Dingle, Leeds, Stuns and Co. Cheltenham, Buelde, Lynn. Gales, Cambridge, Gee Leketter, liwinfen, C:aiderbury, Britow, Lewes, Elliott. Cadifle, Jullie , idanchefter, Lynch, Chatham, Et Geris:ton, Margate, Miser, Chelmsford, Messy and Co. Newbury...Fulfil', Cheiter, Poole and Soo, Neweaftle, Visitor, Chicht•ler, Northampton, Dicey and Co. Dublin, Spilfbury and Co. Nu:tin:am, Burbage end Cos Durham, Herd. rfint , Norwich, Stevenson and Cu. Deal, Note, Osferd, ' _ _ 11 yihatttl Nettl•tat♦, lkw;r, Ne:;k.. . , Ikvia.a, Erin.? hies, tfrnouti., r4Lien, itb....dual, Smart, Aid CA. tier, 1 'alba, Shelaniery, - and Cu. Surthair,iton, Rainer, Mr. it. Scott, deux. Pi etton, Stvjent, Davidtim & Pal iuni, Mr. A. Lierry, C44dwin, eon fedi. Salinaury. mil by re-A &taillike, and M litint.-retalers is di:tiara Tc dinfe Lndiel or Gentlemen Wed.:rib/so the Sum of Ma trimony, the Undur would particuirely resosnmendehe Bursr tael gyrop, t',prt:r to theirs ranee bJ.re the Altar W lir men), why »re be the fmdkf degree an ref•er.fiec of the viten not briny entirely fond, or Wie% to relaxations of the f 1 4.1 han‘freda dream in the countiaa of Devon and Du#. Id bier been mewed from the kink of tan gravy, the whirls the paper.. in the laid CaliCtiCS, have Ja:iy 'int+ an mama. • -..---- IL oNri 0 N : Printed for the Pll , IPR Li re ~, by' JOAN DA NI U.. /•.:f Crestaby.dreet,. at the Slaw Pa minor.. Orr tee, 1:9 t. Carey4byet; ANS poillithol by IS.VEL. KFNT, (4 Catoerborpoisce, hambotl). at No. t. Carry- Oren. tul at the Sraa-Orrica. Tionpitsltar ; to whit* nake in cerironicetloss ter * T ml of are r0t , 113 'a be •414re1ki •