Star. — London, England, 1805-02-12 00:00:00

meets &setae. I do net think it weary to fay much tut the fubjea. There is fartbetinfortnation from Cadiz, and though Capt. White rays •nothing of the preparations there, becaufe his communicatians were prier to the armament at Ferrol, yet Capt- Gore of the Meath notices preparations at Cadiz in Sept. which correfpond to thofe commenced at Ferrol, and liens to have been defined (or the fame objett ; and the ar mament of the packets. as in time of war, though a minute tircusaltence, &only tends to thew that ba ttle defies were at that time entertained. That ar maments emitted at Ferrol is proved, not only by Ad miral Cochran'; difpatches but alto by the Spaniards thanfelves. The Governor of Gallicia fays that he had received orders for difarming the valets in the which sews that an arming had taken place. Bat the difarmament was merely nominal, as Admi nil Cochrane Rates exprefily that they might again be armed in four and twenty hours. I cannot, there fore, fee how any doubt can be entertained that thefe ' armaments were of a hoftile nature. It was clearly undallood by the Spanifb Government that their neutrality could ant even be connived at, unlefs all armaments were abandoned, yet in a port the 010 a adapted for attempting any defign hoftile to this country, in that port where there was a French and Dutch fquadron, an armament was begun, of which no e: nation whatever was given till it was requir. ed g days and weeks elapfed before any notice was given of it, and no intimation to Mr. There till the rebound reached him from Ferrol, when the anfwers to him were vague and general, and the Governor of Gallicia's explanation to Admiral Cochrane fated that the armament was for a ferret expedition. Could the Brit& Government have been juhified in over. looking naval preparations amid& circumtlances of filch Arm f picas ? What then was the cnndua of Minters. I think we are entitled to credit for what we did. It reams to be contended by thole who have laboured to blacken us, that we did too little. Had we idled up to the principle of unqualified war, I ap prehend it cannot be difputed that it would have been jell, according to the heft writers of s the law of na tions. A conditional declaration of war had been given, and it is agreeable to the bell opinions, that if the cafe arrives to which the condition applies, it is lawful and juhifiable to proceed to aaual without any farther notice. We however did not go fo far. If we could prevent France obtaining the (mews of war by intercepting the treafure fhips • if we could prevent the junaion of the French and SPA- M& Beets, and their hoftile co-operation anft us, we winged to allow Spain an opportunity f or repen tance and for returning to her true intereft. And when we were more lenient than the frig law would have juhified, it is hard to charge ni with eatraordi - rigour and violence.—We narrowed the piaci hofillity—we were contented to prevent dan ' than feek revenge—to prevent accumula .nofe means and rerources of which France expeeed the poffeffion in order to turn them \ the vital intereas of the Britith nation. Un circumflances we flatsd two propnfitions, am, to any farther connivance in the nee- Spain, and thefe were the reduaion of the dewy to what it was not at any period of negociation, but before the war with France ••• . and, fecondly, a communication of the with the latter. As to the firft. it was smeary to render the neutrality of Spain tolerable or fare, and after what bad taken place, time been weaknefs indeed to have been &- Ads. As to the (econd, it was unquef f the right of this country to have comma. ,on of a convention by which a war tubfidy to indefinite amount was paid to France, and the was a refumption that it contained hi. incompatible with oar intereft and fecurity. to there points, when urged by Mr. Frere, d'Alfames, a general denial was given of exiftence of arntansents, and the communication • treaty refuted. This unfatistaillory =twee too after Mr. Frere had three times de pairs -mend before any intelligence of of the frigates reached the Spanills Go . That point therefore 'makes no part of and we ihonld equally have been at war taken place. I do not fay this to exte . proceeding, of which I Una I have alrea• enough completely to juftify, deplorable as arcumftances were with which it was at indeed bloodibed, though flied even in ), mull always be regretted, yet that oc certainly had no influence on the final de la queSon of peace or war. I mat, there ' have falkieady proved that, even in the ,ement of the megoaations we had a jolt war, which never was abandoned ; that dur _:caid period dbr forbearance, while Spain bound, and aitually paid a war fubfidy of 3 fterling to France, was conditional ; and that condition being violated, we were again poffeffed be right of war provifionally declared ; and all demands of fatisfaftion and fecurity being rejea. io cookquence at open war. In thefe cir- I entertain a fall confidence that the vote Honk will recognife the jullice of our carafe, &maim the e of the Government, and lay , of the arm the profetfions of a dutiful people, determined to make every facirfice vindication of their rights, and in the defence :ir country. He conelndea with moving an ad ramble to the foregding fentiments. -AMY then rote for the purpofe of moving suendment to the propofed Addrefs. Differing •:4 t o t a lly from the view of the fubjett, which Hon. Gentleman had taken of it, and cal he felt himfelf, to expode the numerous rhich he had introduced with the view of the Honfe, he was aloof afraid that he e occafion to trefpafr on the indulgence of for the time it would be neceltary to oc difeuffion. For the fake, however, of his arguments within as Sort a (pace as fhould lay ottt,pftiew-eiery circumftance immediately sectary' to enable the Houk to - fair decifion. The fir& queftion he was having refolved was, what Reps bad been / the late Mallen to liftman how far there likelihood of Span, is cafe of a rupture be. • country-waft France, fulfilling the terms of of Ildefonfo ? He did not mean to deny might have been an arrangement formed, Spain could, to a certain extent, have torn the terms of the Treaty without shoge. teiting her neutrality. It was, however, the duty of Minifters to have inquired, whether. she Treaty was to be eonfidered and sided on by Spain as merely defenfive, and not an offenfiee compam.. It might be a queftioewhether it could not have been underflood with fuch limits as might have altered its original charaaer, and it became a matter of policy to determine, how far a fyftem of neutrality, confet edly imperfea, was not preferable to &anal warfare. He witted to know, whether the late. Minifters had in the fiat inftance clearly defined what was the policy by which their conduit to Spain was to be regulated ? They had not, in his opinion, though profeffedly de= firous of allowing Spain to remain neutral, defined the principle on which they were to a& He could not find, from the papers on the table, that they had, previous to the ad of Jane, tBo3, prefented any in- Itruitions to our Minifter at the Court of Madrid, on the grounds of Spina neutrality. Now, as early as the Bth of March, when his Majefty's Meffagf was delivered to Parliament, a rupture with France might have been anticipated, and that Spann neu trality was in great danger of being difturbed by the renewal of holtilities. Under thefe circumftances it was natural to fuppofe that no time would be loft in coming to the earlieft poffible explanation on the fubjelt, and that the Secretary for the Foreign De partment would give our Ambaffador at Madrid filch diftina and ample direaions for procuring filth explanation as would lead to a proper underftandiog on the fabjea. Before he had perufed the Pape rs he certainly did fuppofe that furl inftrultions exifted, bin his furprife was not trifling when he raw the in arations of Lord Hawkelbury on this mote impor tant fubjea. Mr. Frere was indeed jangled to de mand from the Spani(h Court an explanation whe ther they would carry into effea the treaty of Ilde fonfo, or whether they had any view of an arrange ment more confident with the continuance of neutra lity ? He was, not, however, inaruaed to proteft againft the fulfilment of the treaty, but was to re. main contented with a fimple anfwer of whatever defcription it might be, and this imfwer he was to tranfmit to his Court. Thus arofe a cafe which might have been eafily forefeen, for the inftruaions given to Mr. Frere were fuch as were totally inadequate to enable him to explain in what way Spain's neutra lity could be admitted, and what grounds would be confidered by this country as the neceffary fource of the renewal of holtilitiesi At the very outfet no. thing was fettled, nothing defined fo as to prepare the way for fubfequent negotiation, and thus inau fpicioufly was the difcuirion betwixt the two countries commenced. Mr. Frere feemed from his own lan guage to have been fenfible of the inadequacy of his original inftrnaions, and though afterwards feveral communications took place on the fubjefl, yet from the time that be received bib firlf inatuaions in June, he had no powers to come to any arrangement till the :4th of December. It was not till after this in. terval that Knitters had made op their minds in what mode Spanifh neutrality was to have even a chance of continuing. During the intetval, they were ap prized that a fubfidiary treaty was concluded be twixt France and Spain. As early as the aoth of September Minifters had received fonse intimation that loch a treaty was in eontemplatioa I and was it not moft extraordinary if they meant to confider it as a ground of war, or to faffer it to pafs as a tem. porary means of neutrality, that it was not till De cember that they received certain intelligence of the propofed treaty, or took any fteps in confiquence of it? Though Lord Hawkefbury waft have been wellaware that Inch an arrangement was on the eve of being con cluded,he, by a molt unpardonable and unaccountable negligence and remiffnefs, leaves Mr. Frere totally without the means of aging in a manner fuitable to the new Rate of the relations betwixt the two coun tries. What he next objeaed to Minifters was, that they never came to any fatisfaaory explanation with the Spanifh Government as to the terms on which they were willing that neutrality fhould be for a cer tain period maintained. They complained that French troops were marched through the Spanifh territories, and that Enna prizes were fold io the Spanifh ports. They remotiftrated againft -there as eels inconfillent,with neutrality, and an amicable ex planation enfued. But though they knew that a fubfidiary treaty exifted, they did not rota againft that treaty as inconfifteot with the continuance of our forbearance. The language of Wainer. was not, that they would &attar declare war on account of the exiftence of the treaty. On the contrary, they (offered it to be aged on, as they thenffelves de firibed, as a means of temporary neutrality. It was quite clear, that early in January t 804, there was fuch an widertianding as that he had jolt alluded to. There was an underftanding that no armaments lhould take place in the Spanifh ports, and that henceforth no prizes Should be fold in the Spanifh ports; but the fubfidiary treaty was, if not direaly admitted, at lealt to a certain degree tolerated. If filch an anderftanding did trill, was it, he talked, confiftent with good f aith or common juftice to turn Sort on the Spenifh Government, and have recourfe to an aft of the lama atrocity, and contrary to every principle of the law of cations? Was it at all confonant to the charaiter of a wife or great Government to allow Spain to labour under the impreflion that her , neutrality would be xerpeaed on certain conditions ? Was it fair that an alledged caufe of complaint Should be treafured up merely with the view of being produced at a more conve nient period, when an undue advantage could be taken ? but this was precife.ly the light in which be confidered the renewal of hoftilines with Spain. The Right Hon. Gent. who opened the bean& had compared the grounds of our difpute with Spain, to the manner in which an And would be pat to a truce. As loon as the terms of it were broken, a. renewal of holtilities was the natural and neeeffary confequen:e. Though be could not, for his put, allow the fairnefs of the consparifoo, fill he thought it neceffary to fay, that even with refpea to a trace the Rig: l t: g rout:Me Gentleman's clothing could not be ed. Before the expiration of a truce there was a (Mall underftandiag of the renewal of holtilities. Witt he objeaed to in the charaler of the renewal of the spanith war was, that the Spa nifh Government were taken wholly unpreparad, and during the continence of an implied proud., that their neutrality woold.continne to be refpreed- In the firft infianee, st oras a quefthm whether the fulfil ment of the treaty of Ildefonfo was compatible with neutrality. That qbeltion had been refolved by an implied arrangement that it Should be,carried into effea under henitatiotts• That implied ananiemeBt Mr. Trent ntaintained it, Merest parts of hie dif patches, and there was so queßion that the Spasith Government ailed under the impreffioa of its being in exilkoet. The queaion then came to be, had any other fonts been paid to France betides thofe to which the urangement alluded to referred ? Had Frenchtroops, after rensonftrarkee were made on the fub jet, beea (offered to pots through the Sputa ter ritories, or had the fide of Englills prizes been continued ? If this was not pretended, therefore, the Spaniards were attacked completely off their guard. A defire was ezprefed to know the amount of the fuecour furnithed to France; the Spanifh Go vernment had p difpefition to give this information, but they Rated that General Bournonville would not allow this information to be difclofed. If Minifters. after receiving this information. were not fatisfied. why did it happen that they did not infift on a per emptory anfwer. and order Mr. Frere to infill on the communication required ? They had not done this, and therefore it was fair to prefume that they were willing to furter Spanifh neutrality to continue, according to the terms contained in the implied agree ment. Under the exillence of fuch an agreement. good faith called on us to warn the Spaniards that our Minifters were determined to put an end to the imperfed neutrality that exifted, and then the Spani& Government could have no reafonable ground of complaint. The condo- of Minifters to Spain was fimdar to that of a perfon who agreed to compound a bitfinefs to decided by a lawfuit, and who, after inducing his adverfary to difcbarge his counfel and witneffes, afterwards unexpeftedly renewed the pro cefs, and obtained a verdi ct bythefe fraudulent means. He begged leave to elk why, if there was no fuch agreement as that to which he Co often referred, Lord wefbury never from January, when it was fop pored to have taken place, down to the day when he was deprived of the office of Secretary for the Fo reign Department, never denied its exiftence. The amended Adminiftration was patched up pretty much in the fame way as the Houfe were accußomed to patch up Bills. Another patch had lately been ad ded, and he hoped there was the usual clan's provi ding fur altering and amending during 'the precut Seffion. But it was curious to think of the Noble Lord's refigning the Peals of office without explain ing a bufinefs of Co much importance. It was literally true, however, that the Noble Lord died, and gave no fign. It might be contended, indeed, that though Lord Hawkefbury had been filets on the ruble°, this was no proof that any fuch agreement exitled. To this he had a plain anfwer, that it was fair to pre fume that fibs ice gave conknt. He had now to ad vert to the condo& of Lord Harrowby after his ele vation to power. It could not Purely be imagined that he was fo occupied on his entrance into office, that he had no time to attend to the Rate of our fo reign relations, and unquellionably the Rate of our relations with Spain was none of the kali confidera ble. Though his Lordthip came into power in May, yet we hear nothing on the fubjcd till July, and he was not Curtly faxing too much to fay that fuck an interval was not eerily accounted for. In May. 1804, it was Rated dißindly that money was paid to Francct in May, and alfa in July, Rill not a word of inftruc tion is given on the fubjed. Not a fusee obfervation is made i to thew a define of annulling the fubfldiary treaty. On the contrary, there was every appearance of its being continued to be acquieked in. But bete Minifters Rood up and contended that even foppof , ing the agreement to have taken place, it was re fcinded by the accounts received of the Rate of the pre parations in the Spanith ports. The orders for the feizure of the Spanifh frigates were founded on infor mation which Adntital Cochrane had furaithed.— Now he fliould feel himfelf gratified by learning whe ther the Spaniards did not give the molt fatisfaftory references AS to the armaments in their ports. They affirmed, in the tuft place, that the armaments were not intended to be employed againtt this country, and to other remonlirances that they had no longer any exillence. As this explanation was given, why was the difcuffion on the other points fo abruptly ter minated ? If an accredited Minister was to be fent to Madrid, why could not Minitlers have waited till his arrival at Mad/id, infield of giving thofe preci pitate orders which bad produced fuch lamentable etre& ? It could not be ferioufly urged that Spain meant any thing hollik to this country. Her in ternal and political - fituation refuted the idea. Spain, Abort verging to political diffolution, waned by peril !enc., and fcourjed by a devouring famine, could en , certain nn idea of bortility agatnft a country with which it has fo many powerful ties of interell. The very ports where the preparations were Rated to be, tended to thew that no hollilities on a great kale were intended. Was it credible that at Carthagena, where thoufands were expiring of a peßilential and loathfome difeafe, there were any views of a hollik nature entertained ? Mr. Dug's reports in July and Augur! lewife 'hewed that there were at Cadiz no preparations of a formidable dekription. The !hips were in general old and crazy, and the stfenale were deßiture of Rores-of all forts. There was no wood but the country pine, and no contrail bad been formed for procuring fupplies from the Baltic. With out attaching any blame to Admiral Cochrane, for whom he thought the highel refped ought to be en tertained, be could not help (eying, that too much firers had been, without inquiry,laid on his Rate:nuns. The feelings of nature, as well as the habits of his pro feffion, "night have led him to give too highly co- loured a picture of the Rate of the naval preparations in Spain. There was an officer, the Captain of the , Malta, whofe opinion he fbouli have wished pro duced on the prefeot occafion. That officer bad been on the Ferrol Ration, and could give very important information to the Honk. At all events the matter was one very fit to be inquired into. But bad Mini s made fuch inquiry previous to the Wiling of orders for fazing the Spina frigates ? They cer- I tainly had not ; nay, be was not quite Cure that even a Cabinet Council was convened on the bufinefs.— He was almort inclined to think that Lord Melville had taken on hinsfelf the refponfibility of Uri:ins the orders in insertion. Was this, he anted, a decent, honourable mode of proceeding I Was it fair treat ment to a nation, anxious for our friendship, and compelled to imp:ander the rod of an unfeeling def. pot ? It was in vain that explanations were offered, and that aguranees of neutrality were given by the Oevereinsat. t. Wood. Owe vac, and' erdis appearance tii esaw so a mare. Tie gent aa4 preelpitaus de parture et Mr. Prue had very awl et dot . It eataisly wee M coined axe et the wbo, wits read tee em II to the base of I "ltd. (Ilered. tha2the gourd was a very pretty goorryl already, and would only be fpoilt by explanation. la defame of the fdzure of the Span* frigates, It was sicieribed as a mature of precaution. —This be denied. for it was a dpi mature of war. While a difpute was pending betwixt the two countries, they bad both a right to take meafores of precaution. ff one nation or tiered their army so be augmented, the other had a right to order a Smiler tweak in his military eitablidussent. If the one in cresfed Ids Davy, the other might be bound In prudence and policy to place his naval forr.ems a more enlarged footing. If the Spaniards bad preperations in their ports, we huh fair right to watch the asethas cithdr Stipa, but we have no right to feise their dim their pedals, sad their goods, without even an appearance of a decimation of war. It was an ad unprincipled and omelettes in the higkelt degree, and calculated to degrade the chandler of the country at a time when It was folespormat to *and high is the opinion of Europa as the &hosiers of Its iderdes alpha law - Ids dominion. Mr. Gay aoudads' his (pee& by roespitolutlog his principal argiuneots, mod dies owed the following Amend west to the original Added': To recurs his Majcity the *eats Odds Haute for the comina illations made to us Madre to the !mitre with --7 To my et our entire convidirm that the eititmies of an Wan. eve Treaty between France and Spats would have amidst bee Moiety to confider Spain as a principal in the prefent war, valet the obliptioos of that Treaty were amomneed, or their exceeds& difclaimed ; and to effuse his Moiety that we That at all dam be ready to fupport him in giving effeA, fo far as the isterets of his dominions may require, to this jolt and medifputed pei ndple. That we dime. however, that his Moiety arm to wave the mac& of this right, in order m negotiate wigs paint for the maintraancs of her neutrality. And thy. 'admit Wet upon oarfdves in the prefent moment to decide • polities of po- Lky depending fo mach as tine anus of width we are MI a.. Informed, we asinowledge with gratitude this proofs/ it Wet tea paternal dare to have prevented the farther estenfiam of that calamities of war. Oat that we beg kare humbly to forefeet to bis Maleßy, that the emotion of there his benevolent willies indirpenilitay required from his Minittere the adoption of tome kat, and uniform prisdples of oegotiatios. declared in the outfit with frank sera, sad Readily pureed to its conclude° i bowed up by as unremitting attention so every new eireonsitases Mktg is the prayers of fo important a difaiSon ; sok aseseepasied by the molt rentysloos tare that all ova telskig hem k ilseadd, to the pan of Great Mtgs. he Mimi with pledgee. asd pee. foamed with unqueftlesalis good tiddi.modoredoe mod bitqpitr. That we have, on the contrary. fees with regret 14 the whole condo& of this trade:non. the elaildeg dab d smisebiel, • and contradidtory policy. That the eddies iszlzprotor. fed in the outlet by his Majerty's Mbstnees, have bass counteradted by their Roams endeavours's keep Are hash she conk and the memo of wet I a Purlrefe7hall juitice and with wifdom. deitruetive of steeldsess es the pare of the power with whom they treated, mei beempdhis with as *eft foe which they were mgodating. Thatdudes the whole mune of theta &Amadeu. While they were felleideg hots Spain *wretched eassmonetathei se pokes of sested lets. reit. their owe indecillos prevents 4 them* return Ross t a Mated itatessent of the teems es which Greet Britsie= content to reespife the neutrality of !bat 'ewer. That their pound of gigabit* wee repesedly edited. their 4simeM ruled sod their reeceilloos gedelined ; se4 that *he* ilex agre ment a pears at bit to have beenlotiog, muddier Igs date, sot Its s were areertaleed withprodllse ; yet, both ere IST pestedly referred to by the Beitith as we/ as she Ypeula Mi*Asts, and the breach of More very conditions it alledged muse apothems the part of Great Britain, for We vitae cotruseneteneet 41 beak That the cotillions and deo& 'lath diltiognifb &Ore tradolls dons, u well as the fatal coofecpiatem to which it has led, an only be afcribed to the wawa rimapleoo which la was snood. e 4, and to the erlanittal and alum* *wields negligence with which it hubs:en condotted. That k y ear duty to reveals to his Maleftg, that in • ter peace or war be tween Great Britain and Spin, phodpally at Madrid. no iarastions were fast to hie ladder t that Coast s from the ad alone to the oath of , in the year sing from Menet to the sat jallOarT, to tkil year fonowint oar Walla from that date to the aoth of September. That to the firit of tido intaeats, helot little Ids than de months, the negotiation foe Treaty of *totality between Prance and Spin was hem, con• dosed, and concluded; yet not the CmalleSt intimation woe, In that long time, glom to Mr. Pies, of the light in which that smock. doo was uoMered here ; of the language it was proper for hint to hold; or of the madams it might he oettrary for him to take; although frown* oonommicatioss were made to him an the bib. jolt, by the Spas* Govtrognint. who appear to hue km Op* ed to pay great attestionin this Lofton* to any reprefentation from Great us, _ _ _ _ _ That dieirig the lift eit the abovementlooed periods, the fan* Monter, though left spin toe mossy months without any inert!, dons whatever, sepciated and concluded row sow:ad* with lipain cm this molt important Culp& of which agreement Doc* Mon was ever rarefied to him (nimbi:nee, either before or ages its tondullon; nor does it even now appear, from any official dor I MUM. whether the fame was meant to be aftowethre difalloweds ridded or rejeded, by the BMA Government. That we feel osafelves compelled to exprefs to his brajefty, that in the ferther provers of there eranfadions, the indedffon and ogled of his Government were fiseceeded by precipitate Re fob:dons and ads of violence dray injurious to the honour and lotereft of his kingdom. That we thookl have applauded any eockarocr by firm and tem perate reprefesection to extriew.e our rattiest. with Spain from the coofaton in which they had been bivalved, sad to Wing them to a &Mod Slue of acknowledged neutrality or decided war, bat that we find no tray of any inch attempt. And that In the middle of September, on the deft intimation of rappelled mom mans in the Spacial ports, eta of !teenier were decided on by his Majefty's Government previons to ail complaint, and executed without notjee dude; a period of amicabk negotiation. That the dirpoiltiona of Spain appear, from the informatien of his Mak:firs Minifter at Madrid, to have continued up to that moment friendly to Great Britain, and that the condad of his Majefty 's Minden in having, under Melt eireumilaneu, antici pated all explanation by concealed orders for an attack on Splutillt kips, property and fubjecia, cannot be jailed on any ground of public law, muds le recoodled to there principles of moderation and liberality which belong to the arida charader, and will& In the prefent &nation of Europe, it is peculiarly the ditty of this Country to Maintain inviolate. That on reviewing the difeaffsens which immediately preceded the Ferenc War, we cannot but reprefern to his Majtity the &co da di ff erence between the condud of the pedal left in charge of his Majeity's affairs at Madrid, and the tenor of the only inftnre dons under which he appears to have &dad. 1 bat the raises. dons given to that Gentleman by the Spin& Government, though not in all points adequate to the jolt ezpodatiens of this country, were yet inch as o f maniteffly (according to thole loftrodiess) to have determined him to wait at Madrid for the arrival of an ere credited handier authorifed by his Majefty to arrange with that Court all points of difference. And that we have therefore fern with egad furprifc and indignation the final &aka of bis Ma jefty's Minifters, not only to adopt the inconederate Refolution taken by the King's Reprefentative in withdrawing bleared from Madrid ; but alto to treat with utter difregard the fubfequent offer from the Smith Malta at this Court to padre the fame Wed- Sons oaf.-an offer which, if accepted, might probably have led to a radsfadore conclufion on matters upon width the two Courts were Co nearly agreed. That while we have thus thought it our duty to re reran to his Majefty the errors of his Miniftera in the conded of this important tranfsetion, and the fatal more quenees which have Welted from them, we beg kaveto repeat our humble absence that we are ready to (uppers his Majet ac t u tt utinoft in every module neediary to affect the rights and the honour of bis Crowo—objedts which can new be faceefsfelly ruined by negligent and undecided Commas, nor attained by the violation of mgogenteots on which thole with whom we treat have rifted their fecurity. Lord CASTLIILIAGS (poke in ankra to Mr. Grey, and Jl,ord TIIMPL S &laded the Amendment.' . . Mr. WINDHAM rote and moved, that the Debate Osould be adjourned dB te4llOllOW. Tat Mod= created a violent clamour awes the Members, tome calling out, " Ns ! no ! Go on ! Go on r and others " Adjourn ! adjourn!" The CHANCELLOR of the tXi.:HECTER, however t appraf el the umiak by Ostia', ..hat much as he winked th e fubjea to be dikeired and decided in one night, be now perceived that it would be 'eke lapse* to do fo. Conflating, therefore, the eafe and cenvenienceed Geodemen, be had noobjedlion to an adjournment tlr emoserrovr. Tbs 'sake for adjourning the debate until to-morrow, was pip put and curial—Adjourned at near two in the morning. LONDON: Printed and pablEhrd by LEVEL KENT, OW Can terbury-pia, Lambeth), 112. the Bras °VMS, Na t, Camp Oast MUMPS *at the STAS Orem, Tanple•Bat. be armed in fd fore. fee how armaments w • underftood b 3 neutrality con armaments wi I adapted for a country, in i Dutch (quadri no exoaustica ed s days and given of it, an rebound reach to him were w Gallicia's expl that the armiu the Brit& Go looking naval inch bang ful Minifters r I c we did. It fa laboured to bl we need up ti ' prebend it can pa, accordin] • tubes. A ea given and it i the c afe arrive lawful and jul without any fi fo far. If we • (mews of war / 0 we could pre. 0 Mai fleets, an , • we winged to i tames and fen when we wen have jliflified, nary rigour al plc of hoftilit I Ref rather tha non of thole only ezpeeed againft the vii der tbefe aim =Au qua aen, trality of pi Spanifli navy the negociati broke out i a convention w abfolutely on M all tolerabl it would havd tufted with h id tionably the 4 1 imitation of a an indefinite refufal of it . t relations inn i In anfwer to I our Charge d the exiftence of the treat, was given to mended his p the capture o veransent. the cafe. and had it never t SOUe that pr dp faid maul feast of the a tended, as I lawful war, currence cent cifion of the I fore, that I h commence= eau& of war. ing the teem became bound millions fterli the condition of the right i our demands ad, we are in eninftances, I , of the Houk and Citation I . at the foot of and loyal per in the vindica of their couni • drefs fishable Mr. GRE' an Amendat t . as he did toe the Right Hi led nu, as Is fallacies whit , naleading th . thould have I . the lioufe. fa copy in the • bringing his poffible. he fl • not iinmedia . come to afa . defitßos of h, taken by the was a likelih twist this col • " the Treaty a that there vizi by which Spi plied with ti the: forfeit*