Star. — London, England, 1828-03-25 00:00:00

Sik\\ *. \ allisiksftsk tbasktt4MinistMsholifilliostpone their state :Dent until after the holidays, when the discussion arid Ite rp , ent f • e matter may come on at the same Mr. FE GUSON thought it better that the measure should not be postponed ;*tt veil - a -but just that &edamd and all other remote parts of the Kingdom should have some previous knowledge of the intentions of the Go vernment on this great question. Not having heard even a surmise of the intended plan, he could not be prepared to vote on it until he should have learned the opinions of his constituents. He wished to hear the intentions of Government on Friday, but thought the House ought not to vote upon it then, or give a deci sive pledge of following any particular line of conduct. Sir J. NEWPORT expressed his hope that the Right Hon. Gentleman would develope his plan on Friday.— He should have no objection to a discussion on that oc casion, as he was sure it would do much good to ascot+ tain the general opinion of the House on the subject.— But then the Bill ought to be postponed until after the holidays, as otherwise the people of Ireland would have no means of learning the nature of it in time, or of ex pressing their opinion on its provisions. Mr. Secretary PEEL considered it a compliment to the Government that the Hon. Member opposite had not heard even a surmise of their intentions on the sub• ject. The House would do well to remember that the Corn Quection differed (tom all others on this paint, that on the consideration of it they had the benefit of previous deliberate discussions. Them were two pro posals before the House—either that the Government should develope its plans on the day fixed, without coming to a vote on the subject, or postpone the con sideration altogether until alter the holidays. The total postponement he considered very inexpedient; it would be better to develope the plan on Friday, in the shape of resolutions, and to discuss and come to a vote on the r 'solutions at the same time. That moJeof proceeding would not, however, bind the House to any particular course on the general subject, when introduced as a Bill. It would merely have the effect of calling upon the House to express their opinion in the way of a general af f irmative or negative; otherwise it would be better to postpone the consideration of the question altogether until after Easter. Colonel SIBTHORPE was understood to favour ' the discussion of the subject on the day proposed, and the postponement of a final decision until after the holidays. Mr. BARING held that if it was true, as he had heard, that Ministers were not agreed on the measure, that was a good reason for postponing the Bill until the Ministers shouYi have agreed on some good mu sure which they could bring forward unanimously.— But unless that were the case, he could not consent to leave the country, until after the holidays, in ignorance of the course intended to be pursued on a measure so important and interesting to all classes. He had un dersibod that the question had been delayed hitherto by the fact that the Right Hon. Gentleman bad not been sooner returned by his constituents. But now, it would be nothing less than trifling with the feelings of the country to put it back until after Easter; at the same time that it would be absurd to call immediately for the opinion of the House, on a plan that must neces sarily abound with complicated details. The public also ought to get time to form and express their opi nion on the subject. He hoped the Right Hon. Gentle ' slim would state on Friday to the House the intentions of the`Goternment, and having taken a vote on the Re sofotions, postpone the Committee till after the holidays. He finally trusted that the Ministers would not yield trYthepoitpeinement suggested by the Hon. Gentleman (Sir Edward Knatchbull)—a proposal which. but for the respectability of the quarter from which it had came, he should be inclined to suspect, from the facility with which the Right Hon. Gentleman appeared to yield to it, to be a trick, got up with a view to postpone the Right Non. Genileman's motion. Sir E. KNATCHBULL expressed his gratitude to the Hon. Member for his compliments, but warmly, rt. Oiled the idea of being a party to any such trick as the H In. Gentleman had alluded to. Mr.'BARING,'in explanation, disclaimed all ioten• lion of uttering any thing offensive to the Hon. Member (Sir E. Knatchbull). Mr. BENbTT was understood to favour the post ponement of the question, in the absence of so many Gentlemen interested in it. •Mr. GRANT, perceiving that the feeling of the House was decidedly in favour of the exposition of the subject_on Friday, stated his intention of allowing the niotion to stand for that day. Sir E. KNATCHBULL having presented a Petition . Mies the Maltsters of RAmsgate and Margate, against tbeMalt Act, asked the Rigkt Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Grant) whit was the precise nature of the course he in tended toinirsne on the Corn Question ? `Mr. GRANT answered, that he should allow his static/410 remain as it stood at present. On Friday, hiriring'ezplained and submitted his Resolutions to the House, he should propose that they be voted in that *Vt, mid then move for leave to bring in a Bill louodld on them. Sir E. KNATCHBULL declared his intention of using every form of the House to oppose the measure. Mr. Secretary "HUSKISSON contended, that his Right Honourable Friend'i *mode of proceeding was not at alt unfair; on the Contrary, it was the regular course. 'lf the Resolutions should pass, then they might be shaped (according to custom) into a Bill, and that be reported and printed ; but that course would by no means bind the House to carry the Bill throu g h its, ultimate stages . As to postponing the exposition, he could not but think that if the Parliament followed , such a course, they would play the part of childretV and look as if they were afraid of stating their inten tions to the public. Sir M. W. RIDLEY thought that the zeal of his Hon. Friend the Member for Kcnt, in behalf of the agricul tural interest, likd carried him a little too far ; because it was surely the interest of all parties concerned, that the discussion of such a qucstioo as this should come on as soon as possible—(dear). Mr. HEATHCOTE then 'moved for a Return of the total number of Ships which had passed the Sound during the year 1527, distinguishing the countries to which the same belonged.-- Ordareds SUPPLY—RUSSIA AND PURIST. Up . pn the motion of the Csaitcat.Los of the EleriPluri for read ing the Order of the Day for going intp a Committise of Supply. S:r R:WILSON rose - to put some questions to the Ministers. - The Honourable Member alluded to the ' declaration made front the highest quarter. which had since been frequently repeated by others high in autho rity; that the Treaty of Landon was to be carried into strid execution, and aid that his object was to inquire whither that determination was to be persetered in.?. Circuinstances' had sine atisen—the issuing of a mail. febto,' if it could be so called, which betrayed the inst. dins coarse of policy - pursued by the Ottoman Govern meet ; .distervery that by its interfefence the peace' of Pere% had bow interrupted,' and the breaking of the truce witiVileas expected to have followed from the confederacy off, Ackermira--01 1 of which , indwd and vornPlilled RaaAla s itonte any vt. of yktratellisement,(but fa thi i pur ' ..of . vindicatit hettown konoter andintetehts, to m Ailsowile move Fe sent agalbst that Fraseter. - aahis -thought wools' the most auspicious time-bes t with a view to effecting-Our imtaediate object,-1111iatia of presiniting the ultimate establishment of Russia is a pOsitioluerbich would be highly 'inconvenient to the test of Europe— for this country and France to enforce and secure the objects of the Treaty of the 6th of July. He wished to have a definitive answer to this question, whether or not .it was the intention of his . Majesty to pursue that policy declared in the Speech from the Throne, at the opening of the Session, and to carry the Treaty of London into Atli effect, without allowing any circumstances to inter lifere and prevent the object of liberating Greece and ',rescuing its population from the exterminating tyranny l of the Turks ? The second question he wished to ask I . vres, whether arty orders given by the late Government bad been renewed by the present one to the Command ing-Officers of the ships in the Mediterranean to prevent supplies from being carried to the Turkish fortresses, and the prisoners of the Turks from being carried into captivity as slaves ? Mr. Secretary PEEL said, that the Hon. Member, must excuse him, if, in replying to his questions, he should separate that which was a direct question from that which was comment or observation. The question put was, whether or no his Majesty was disposed to ad. 'here to the declaration made to Parliament on the first day of its meeting, as to his Majesty's determined ad herence is the engagements of the Treaty of the 6th July, without allowing any circumstances whatever to. interfere with its object—that of obtaining the complete pacification of Greece? His answer was, that there was no change whatever in his Majesty's determination to do every thing in his power to give effect to the Treaty. When the Hon. Member asked him to say whether his Majesty would allow any circumstances whatever to interfere with the pursuit of that object, he was asking 1 fur an answer upon future contingencies, which it. was, impossible to foresee. All that his duty warranted Mtn' in saying was, that no change whatever had taken place in his Majesty's intentions. With regard to the posi tion of Russia, all he bad to say was, that no official information bad reached this country of any actual change in the relations between that country and Turkey. They were in possession of uo informa tion that Russia had declared war, or committed any act of hostility which ehauged the relations in which she stood towards Turkey previous to the Treaty of London. Whatever might be the apprehensions of the Honourable Member, until they arrived at the point when authentic information reached this country, he felt that he should best discharge his duty by abstaining from, all comment upon this topic. The second question of the Hon. Member was, whether orders had been renewed to the Officers commanding our fleet in the Mediterranean to blockade the forts of she Mures; to prevent supplies from being sent into them, and to prevent the popula tion from being carried away to a state of slavery ? Previous to the battle of Navarin, enders were issued to the Commanders of the Allied Fleets, to keep up such a blockade as should prevent the afrival of rein forcements. After the battle, those instructions were considered to remain in full force, and since that, the attention of the Allied Squadrons had been recalled to those instructions. With regard to the removal of the .prisoners, information had arrived in this country, not information of a vet y distinct character, but information had been conveyed here, from which it appeared that Ibrahim Pacha intended to carry the Greek women and children into captivity, and convert them into slaves.— All he Could say was, that before the Ti eaty of London was signed, or before the Protocol was signed, a d;s• tinct intimation had been made to Ibrahim Pacha. that his Majesty would not suffer such an extreme exercise of the rights of the Sultan, if rights they could be called, and that if an attempt was made to commit acts sore- 1 volting to humanity,' his Majesty was determined to interfere and to resist it. . • Lard MORPETH expressed his satisfaction at finding frogs the Right Hon. Secretary that it was still the deter ruination of the Government to carry the Treaty of London into full execution. PUBLIC WORKS. Sir J. GRAHAM, adverting to a motion made by the Member for Dorsetshire (Mr. Bankes, sen.) on a for mer evening, kr the appointment of a Select Committee, which was made, he observed, at a late hour, add to which he did not object, wished now to here some in foe viatica respecting the motives of the Hon. Member in moving for a Committee of Inquiry into the state 01 the further works, because that it was a subjtct which snore properly came under the cogniz env: of the Finance Committee. Beside., he protested against the motion, as the Committee, which consisted of 16, was composed, among the number, of six Members of the Finance Com. mittee, four of whom were Member s of the Goer: nment ; and, consequently, being interested in tie question they bad to inquire into,w ere subject to challenge. The Master of the Mint and the First Commissioner of Woods and Forests were two of these Members. N rw, without meaning to impute any thing improper, these Gentle men would have to investigate matters which possibly it might be desirable to suppress. The Committee cer tainly was a Committee of •Paste, and must of necessity have questions forced upon them which might lead to the stifling inquiry into the expenditure of the country, a subject which was more immediately the object of the Committee of Finance, of which these Gentlemea formed a part. He was most .anxious to guard against aay thing of the sort, and therefore he wished to know from the Member for Dorsetsbire what were his objects when he moved for the appointment of the Committee? Mr. BANKES, sen. would have been ready to ex plain his objects when he moved for the Committee, if any Honourable Member had expressed a wish for in formation. At thesante time he was not aware what Were the objects which the Hon. Baronet wished , to have answered. He seemed • to complain of his taking the business out of the-hands of the Finance Committee; but did the Honourable Baronet not know, that the Finance Committee had already a • great mass of business before them—more, perhaps, than they could get through with this Session. - Nor did he think the subject to which the ,Committee ;in question re ferred, was peculiarly- suited to come under their in quiry. • With respect to the insinuation, that he had ob tained the appointment under a false pretence, he trusted tbat he bad been so long in that House, and his condlict was so well known and appreciated by so many of the Members, that it would be unnecessary for him to repel an insinuation- of the kind—(Hear, hear). — What possible object could he have in screening any Honourable. Member .or subject which required inves tigation? 13n1 other occasions, more than twenty years *go b -haired made* similar motion, and then nothing of the kind was atternthed to be imputed to him ; at that tint), a separate Repent was made as to the state of Pub lit Boildioge. . Since then, most certainly, the system had been altered-a-wheiher for the better • he could not taybnt at all events, as the subject related to the Board of Works, a distinct Committee, perhaps, was the best proses _ tos,tlc seqopintetthimoth nes were in coati He crkold D ame several, the Custom House, (or instance —indeed, the want of responsibility, and the want of eontroul Over these works bad bees often'eowiplained of. With respect to the Committee, the number wit IS, and not 16 ; many of the Members did net belorig to the Finance Committee; all that was directed to see was, that the charges for the woritabad been properly applied. Mr. ARBUTHNOT was desirous, as certain insinnat tions had been made against his character as First Core missioner of Woods and Forests, that the mat minute ,inquiry should take place into his conduct. He had not the most distant wish to shrink front inquiry. Tbil ,Right Hon. Gentleman said, he could not have received ( the appointment if he had not been.ready to meet any ,inquiry into his conduct. Twenty-one years ago, he had, by the most honourable and industrious means, acquired an income, arising from his own individual exertions, fully equal to that which at present he enjoys' by right of office. He accepted of the situation which he now holds, in consequence of his attachment to his Majesty's present Government, and he chelleoged.the .Hon. Baronet to look narrowly into the whole of his conduct Hear, hear !). • - - Sir J.- YORKE was gleCto bear the Right Hon. Gentleman was so anxious to meet inquiry, and he did assure him, that if any thing dropped from his lips, it was not intended as a reflection upon him nor any one else. He could not, however, avoid•thinking it a little singular, that when the Hon. Member for Dorsetshiie stated the labours of the Finance Committee to be so great, that six Members should be abducted or sub tracted from it. He wished to know how the Hon. Member coold , get over that anomaly ? He was aware that these buildings,were the hobby of his Hoe. Friend. Mr. BA NKES, sen. said,* that the Honourable and Galla. t Member was mistaken in his number—there were only four Members abstracted from the Finance Committee. Mr. N. COLBORNE thought the subject of the in quiry was fitting; when he saw the encroachments which had been made upon the Parks, and the number of trees ready to be cut down, he thought it fair that an inquiry should take place. Mr. ARBUTHNOT said, the plans for the improve ment of the Parks came from the Treasury after he re signed. It was not, however, he understood, the inten tion of Government to cut down the trees—at least he had desired Mr. Nash to state that fact, and he had also given the same intimation—that such were his instruc tions. It was not quite fair to talk of encroachments, for the dead wall was certainly bid, and it was pro posed to cover it with shrubs. By the express command of the King, a roast from Pimlico to Story's Gate had been made for the accommodation of the public ; and that the spot where the cattle grazed would be thrown open to the public. The improvements in Hyde Park bad also been made, with a view to the accommodation of the public. ' When he (Mr. A.) went to take the King's commands on the subject, his Majesty said—" it is my desire that the public should have the whole open to them." In fact, there was the greatest desire on the part of the King and the Government, to give every ao commodatioo to the public. With respect to the site of Carlton Palace, there was an intention to have a flight of steps for the accommodation of foot passengers. Mr. H ER RI ES confirmed the statement. of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Arbuthnot) and denied that there was any intention of defeating the objects for which the Committee of Finance was appointed; such imputation was groundless. After some further observation from Mr. N. CALess: and Mr. ARBUTHNOT, Sir JAMES GRAHAM said, he never intended to insinuate any thing disparaging to the character of the Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Arbuthnot), for no man could be more respected in private life. All that be referred to related to official matters.—The Com mittee was then postponed till Wednesday (to-morrow). he had merely stated, that as the interest of the so very heavy, amounting to ne..rly $0 millions annum, the remaining inquiry of the Committee ild not amount to more than 19 or 20 millions.. .re was, however, !tile doubt that the Committe e )1d feailessly, justly, and impartially do their duty. _...........iretr.r.erpleineet.. On the subject o f life annuities, he would throw ,oatearsgettertion for the Finance Committee, and it the tables were ilioa wrong they ctrieeirected, and the public b e er , • abled, if the 'chose; bay life annuities. The better way, however, would be, to ..produce the letter of Mr. Finlainen,.cod *seethe Chairman of the Coenntitteein bit place, he should ask him if be had any objection to produce it ? . . Mr. BARING acconated for the absence of the Ch a ir., man of the toinance ,l on (Sir-H. Parnell) incest. sequence of the extreme labour he underwent. For lbw rest, he (Mr. Bating) never met a Committee room unoninioncin their determioatien c 0 do their slaty. Mr. HUME said, that although the ._Ministers Au. elated the Sinking Fund to be 5.000,0001. per annul there was positively not au apparent excess of more tha n 50,0004 and even if the income and .expendituse were .properly examined, a deficit of three times that aim* would be apparent. Unless there was a positive-excess of revenue, this pretended Sinking .Fund ought not to be kept up. The Hon. Membettherefore objected to the appropriation of this money. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER re marked, if this money *ere not paid into the Uscheque the public would lose the interest of it. Mr. HERMES. remarked, that the Hon. Membet (Mr. Hume) was mistaken is his calculation. The Estimates for the present year were 1;200,000t. lets than last year, so that with that anti the surplus them would be 3,000,0001. clear, to be applied to the Sinking Fund. Mr. HUME would not give the Government credit for any reduction, unless he saw it. The Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Herries) bad talked of a surplus of /3,000,0001. but out of these 3,000,000 i. the GOVeFOOltilt borrowed 51,000,0001. to keep up the farce of the Sink ing Fund, which in his (Mr. Hume's) opinion ought to be abolished. Mr. HERRIES explained. Unless the Home were determined not to receive the money, it must be as is come for the year, no matter to what purpose it might be applied. Sir J. WROTTESLEY admitted that those who tat pn his side of the House had no reason to complain of the manner in. which . the Finance Committee had been eppointed More Members had been taken from such side than from the Ministerial side of the House._ With respect to the question that had been much dis cussed, he must protest against the continuation of the Sinking Fund on its present principles. It had bees maintained. particularly during the last two years, by borrowed money ; for the income, within a fractioa, had only met the expenditure, exclusive of such fund; therefoie, the Sinking Fond must have been maintained try borrowed money. The system was ruinous to the country, and ought to be departed from in time—(Hear) Iltooolution agreed to. Report tomorrow. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved ihe;Order of the Day for receiving the Report on the, Annuities Repeal Bill. • Mr. CALCRAFT wished to ascertain in what gear. ter blame was to be attributed for the losses which the country had sustained by the 'operations of the Atm*. ties Bill. TheCH ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER thought it would be better if the Honourable Gentleman had waited until the Finance Committee could 1.. y beim. the House the particulars of the losses which bad been complained of. _ _ _ Mr. CALCRAFT did not think the repeal of the Bill I at all necessary ; it would, in hiimind,aoswer the object which the Committee had in contemplation, if the operation of the Bill was suspended. Mr. HERRIES said there had been no objection made against the principle of the Bill. The detect, if any, lay in the calculations on which annuities were granted. He agreed with the Hon. Gentleman opposite in the suggestion ; that a suspension of the present Act would answer the object of Parliament better than a repeal. By such course, time would be given to prepare another Act, founded upon better principles. He was not at all satisfied that the country had sustained the losses which had been stated. However. !halter or not, the inquiry was necessary; but he, wished it to be understood, that whether the House determined to repeal or suspend the Act, it would be with a view to the re-enactment of a Bill founded upon good tables. With regard to the imputation of neglect cast upon two Noble Lords (Bexley and Godersch) he was bound to say that they were both entirely free from blame. The letter of Mr. Finlaison, which was said to have been addressed to Lord Bexley, was, in fact, addressed to him (Mr. Herries) five years after the Noble Lord had resigned the office of Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Mr. Finlaison then said that his opinion was founded on calculations which he had not then re duced to form. In fact, the tables which he had pro mised to produce had not been prepared up to the present time—(Hear)—and the losses which appeared from his statement were confined entirely to former annuities, which were granted before the Funds had risen above IKlc the point at which Government would be gainers by the granting of annuities. With respect to Lord Gode rich and Mr. Canning, they had employed as many as ten or twelve persons to investigate the subject, and they could not, after inquiry, make up their minds that the public had sustained any loss by the operations of these annuities: Lord ALTHORP said, that when, on a former oc casion, he had spoken on the subject, he temarked that, in his opinion, there was much exaggeration in the statements of losses to the public, arising out of granting Life Annuities; but he must say, that from the tables of Mr. Finlaison, it was quite evident that the country had sustained great losses from the Annuities which had been granted. As to the particular course which the House might adopt, he did not think that of much importance, provided the granting of further Annuities were put a stop to until complete tables should be formed. Mr. HERRIES explained. He had alluded to the letter of Mr. Finlaison, principally to do away with the charge that persons in the Government had been apprised that the public were sustaining losses to the mo nt of 8,0001. a week, and yet took no means to remedy the evil. Mr. Finlaison did not, in the Br :nstance, say mote than that the tables were agai Government, and it was naturally asked—where ,littjables? Mr. Secretary HUSK ISSON said, that as he was creary for the Treasury in 1809, when the measure • convei ling permanent into terminable annuities was r brought forward, the house would excuse him for ing a few words upon the subject before it. At that t, 'it was thought highly desirable that them should some means of enabling those, who by industry or of weans, had obtained sufficient to purchase their life , nuity, to do so with security to themselves. He re :bad cootie ior,jivirin. His objects were tiro—,albatbasa Vat be bad merely staled, that as t it l a P ieitiN . rel i t ie4 tptbe pvblic ezpeisditpre.* c ported witbake ,seub so very heavy, amounting sting .poislifitvg—. both propeffoeinggry, *d otyibt to ps' pal annum, the remaining inqui tove,.. opeATufiler the coguizange oetya mend, it had would not amount to more than Id be t‘ i thillpse for tepeatett.comillai in Perl . io4lo ) .' There was, however, 1 tile dont 1 the i seamy public works had been be g n, and ientt u- .would listlessly, justly, and imp 'sling .penes incurred. and all - before_Paniamenr itzd - . tees - Mr:Litt.Mtrrerpixinect.. rhicis nsultscqopintptcboptotb *Erks were in contemplation, annuities, he would throw qat e ' • .. IP: rnsnmittee. and it was WAYS AND MEANS. i The Casaseattes of the EICIII4OIII moved the Order of the ; Day for going into a Committee of Ways and Means. 1 Sir ALIZANDIM Ow: in the Chair. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER then I moved that the sum of 2,154,6301. monies payable by the Trustees of Naval and Military Pensions, be allowed to be paid into the Exchequer, for the use of his Ma- I jesty's service. Mr. CALCRAFT regretted that at the end of five weeks we had not had a Report from the Finance Cow mittee on the subject of the public accounts. The Hon. 1 Member had heard with regret, the other evening, that although the expenditure of the country was some 1 fifty millions .per annum, there were only nineteen ! or twenty millions of this to come under the cognizance of the Finance Committee. There was now a great difference between the gross and the net revenue of the country, which amounted to 8,000,0001. sterling, ' which was taken out of the pockets of the people, and I was a matter which, he thought, ought to be sifted- to the ' bottom. Another question—the establishment of the ' Commissioners of Customs and Excise--should be looked into; for it appeared to him that those Boards might be managed at much less expense. He doubted not the ability or the diligence of the Finance Committee, but as it was at present constituted, it would be hardly pos sib!, to get any Report of consequence until after Easter; whereas, had the recommendation of his Hon. Friend (Mr,Hume) been adopted, they would much earlier have terminated ,their labour*, and the House be enabled to legislate upon it in a short time. Sir JOSEPH YORKE, after complimenting the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who had been appointed to his situation, without knowing that two and two snake four, begged to.know whether that great modern Cocker, Mr. Finlaisoa, had not made a very exaggerated state ment of the loss from the annuities ? The CH ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER thanked the gallant Officer for his. compliment on his arithme tical knowledge, and with respect to the Life Annuities Repeal Bill, to which the gallant Officer referred, al though he was satisfied the present system had been the cause of some loss to the country, it was no to the extent which had been stated. Persons more competent than himself had recommended the repeal of the present system, and that opinion had been con firmed by a Atesolstion of the Finance Committee. He (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) could assure the Honourable Member (Nir. Calcraft) that the Finance Committee had not lost sight of the general revenue. of the comfy., and that. they were eagerly looking into its expenditure. It was agreed to lay before the public every particular of the expenditure, and to take mea i sure, according! . , , ' After a few war feint* dam Norm; : . 611. N. W. R LEY explained arhat had fallen from , liirn a few nights belote on the subject of did Finance Committee. The Hon. Baronet did not say that the labours of the Finance Committee should be testi icted, • • . Tbe an to be rea( • The Seas morrow. Mr. T farther i, chisemen should ci He now, ration of rient Bill Mr. A for Herd doted thi (Mr. Sec futura oe, Mr. N had subn The !fig! oohing t he; voted tlemen nos io for Bet ti tattier' so SiT J. House— standee seipect t bee* ma eitee payed to Moeda) , s Lutd J. 111 be re< Tbasts4 frOm Mr. :Mr* Baeougt Coraiah that the Peary n, booting Sir J. ing, tha on the 1 had fall Cher lan nd tha paired Int tisi Cases II is to first meat sinst are and 4 1 in Pen S t . maws re of belln first =kW say- ferg:l time Jbe " )ther Nre e wi- nced •-T e r .st •