Star. — London, England, 1828-02-23 00:00:00

rA e 4 el Other day, that the country was in no difficulty...that there was a Sinking Fond of five millions—that there was plenty of money, and no reduction necessary. Now they had been told a different story from the Right Ho nourable Home Secretary, who had stripped off the veil and exposed the delusion. He was one who thought that the Treasury of such a country as this ought always to have a bonofide surplus of a million or a million and a half, and that its affairs could not be properly con ducted and its credit sustained without it. It was there fore time for them to stop when they found their finances in the state admitted by the Right Hon. Gent. and see whether they could longer continue an enormous system which required such a force in Ireland, and which kept, up such enormous establishments abroad and at home. No man looked with a more favourable eye than him self at the resources of the country if properly managed; !, but he would ask, whether any man could expect the' - country to go on if we were to continue needlessly such an extravagant expenditure in time of peace. He wished to know what alteration there was in the state of the 'country sufficient to account for the difference of our 'establishments and expenditure since 1792. He was -aware that the number of our colonies had increased, 'but not so as to warrant the increased expense of that department. And that raised the question of how our 'colonies were governed. In Canada we had a force of between five and six thousand men to keep up a system hateful to the people, who were at variance with the Governor, and whose representatives had been most •improperly treated by that authority. How should they lake the King of England, after they had twice elected a Speaker, not to allow the elec. t;on, and then send them all about their business? Yet in Canada these things were to be upheld by a gar rison of 6,000 men—a force more than that employed in the whole of the United States. He objected to the I appointment of military governors generally, and the keeping up garrisons to force their arbitrary rule upon the colonists. He wasto be told that these things would he investigated by the Committee of Finance; and he was bound to say, that in that Committee every thing was fair—(Hear)—and that the Right Hon. Gentleman • seemed disposed to let them have every information for the purposes of inquiry. But the question of the amount of our forces,• was one which the House would have to decide, and he contended that there 'was nothing before them to spew that the amount of forces now proposed was necessary. He wished to ask why 22,000 men more than we had in the year 1823, was now necessary ? If this military force was to be con stantly kept up i then they must make up their minds to have a military at:met - natant,. But he trusted. that al though they had.a-military Chief in the Government, his good sense would lead him to see that the Govern ment.bl this country was essentially civil, But if it was • determined to.keep up these egahliahmenti, the finances ..otuat break down, and they must rob the creditor to arthe soldier. He trusted that the Noble Duke, after being the first man of his time in militarY musters, '")rrtliati now earn the better. laurels of . irelioVing, the 'country tram twelve millions of taxes, as be contended ...itiwas in his power to do. The Hon. Member moved Ameadmenr;substituting 60,000.mett for 90000, Sit S. MACDONALD.said, that as tie felt ichis duty no acquiesce in the motion, be rose to. protest against , Itireote being construed into any argument of support the Government. So long as he saw. it Gotternthent inWhich one portion of it was arrayed againatibeOther, Aoki charges of the basest duplicity were preferred by them against each other—whilst 'a Government 'VliSarolsitith this shameful stigma upon it,lt was'not Age thatJte could suffer any vote of his to be given with . a view to its support. With regard to the question• of iattiotio4 the number-of men, he thought his Hon.Ft iend osficsmoved the Amendment, bad taken a clumsy method !Of egecting.his object. They were nohow calledupon to decide what the definitive number of troops should be, until another general discussion, after inquiry, should be had. It was useless to fix any particular number until that inquiry had takes place. However, as the Noble •lestd himself contemplated the possibility of reducing A,olool,,there could be little dotibt but that such a •eiiinction.. was practicable, apd: he therefore thought that it would havebeen as well . to make that reduction in the estimatrat once. With regard to - the sarcasm Gentlethan has. bestowed upon the speech of ,anHon, Aldermao,lie begged to say that he heard nothing in that speech but what was manly *ha, most cottetitutiorial, and worthy the popular rem lintetie'of >igraft City:. But he did not agree with ahe.,Honouratill . Aldeiityan in his sentiments •to the .Finatsce.Commitees.. Hs was og opinion with the Right titiriitGetrtlettritii•that there were thorny questicnss of re• duction affecting particular departments, of which they would be more dieinte44l4lrase ffi cient-judges than such departMenti theMselves.. Mr. Alderman WAITI4MAN said that he had not expressed a- bad.opinion of a' Finance CAosmittee, he had only said that the House ought not to give up its uwo'power. Sir J. MACDONALD said, that when the main Vie*. tint 'before them, lewould be met fearlessly and fully, and that the House would resort to every means of economy which were found. practicable; without wantonly breaking down what was seienthi for the rest service of the country—:Hear.) Lord PALMERSTON contended, that the insertion of the number of men sow proposed. lathe . Mutiny Bill woeld not preclude any reduction whic h ithe. House en:ght hereafter think necessary. It had been asked what itreonvepiente would result from taking the smaller 'number of, meo a at reduction was ccuflellkt plated ?. The answer as that-was, that on accounsref the distance at which osaorof id's:troops were stationed abroad, the 'time was not Calculated frOre the period of the votes, but mucit.layer,is ;be' yesr,accerdihctq the distance. The kloarrarable, Member for montrose, now that the acumen of she Colonial troops were sim plified, fotind fault,' and taunted 'him :with not having One it. sooner. Irje thpught tlija.w,as ¢jit bad encou ragement to those who wished to introduce improve. ments when they.hed opportunities of doing so. But the Honourable Member niight well 'be discontented with Leery improvement of this kind, because it cut off One topic of his speech. But however much he might dislike it, he thought the House would not fail to think him for this retrenchment in the Hon. Member's Army Estimate speech. The Hon. Member had asked for the necessity of the increase which had takeo place in our forces since the year 182$. The HOlllll would remember that the force of um had been brought down from a much larger force which hid existed in some previous years. The consequence of that reduc tion was, that they had representations from all quarters, complaining of the inconvenience and inju r y done to Ile service abroad. It was_ fowl. indeed, that: the service of the Colonies could notbe done, without im posing upon the troops a degree ef fatigue which they could not be expected to endure in time of peace. In consequence of these representations and the difficulties encountered in the service, the House determined that an atiglnentation was necessary, not only to make the service abroad effective, hut so as to have a number.of troops over and above the. actual demind, so that a little surplus should be kepj. as a disposable force at home: He would ask whether that:pea:we of the last two years had taught us that such a prevision was providently made. If that disposable force had not existed it would have been impossible that we should have kept faith with Portugal by sending out the expe- dition which from its promptness proved so efficient. The Noble Lord contended for the advantage of reduc tion by men over the system of reducing battalions. Mr. CALCRAFT said that no detriment had been proved likely to arise from reduction. Mr. P.THOMPSON contended that reductions might be effected by pacifying Ireland and withdrawing the forces, and by giving up all the Colonies which could not pay their own mili- tary expenses. He did not wish to impede the Government, and should therefore, however reluctantly, vote against his Honourable Friend's amendment. Colonel DAVIES said, that by the system of depot corps 11,400 men were uselesa to the service, and that it was the worst system that ever entered the mind of man. He was in favour of reducing by battalions; and if a war broke out, it would be easy to raise others by drafting Officers sad men from old battalions to form new ones. Mr: MONCK said, that although the Government of France was more Monarchical, it was less Aristocratical than ours, inasmuch as it took less from one class of the people to support another class. He wished to call the attention of the Committee to. the dead weight as corn- ' , pared with that of the Government of France. First, no officers were allowed to retire on full pay, which was' a more economical system, and ought to be adopted.— Then he found in our dead weight the sum of 143,0001. for Pensions to Officers Widows. In the French Army no Officer was allowed to marry without being able to settle on his Lady a sum equal to his pay, by which the calamity of her being left destitute was provided against, and no charge was brought upon the State. The Hon. Member shewed that the difference between ' our system and that of the French Army incurred an increased annual expease of 630,0001. according to the Estimates on the table, and strongly contended for the necessity of economy and retrenchment. Sir HUSSEY VIVIAN strongly approved of the sys tem of reduction in the numerical strength of the army, which was at present acted upon. No better plan could be devised than that of preserving the skeletons of regi ments, because they always presented excellent materials for effecting a rapid increa,e in good and efficient soldiers. It was his firm opinion, that if the system bad been acted upon previous to 1798, the war would, in all proba bility, have been brought to a rapid conclusion, and a great part of the debt of which so much was now to be heard, would never have been incurred. He firmly believed, that it, instead of the dribbling way in which our army was reinforced at that period, effi.; cient troops had been sent, the result would have lam vastly different. With respect to what had fallen frank the Hon. Member for Reading (Mr. Monck) concerning the pensions granted to the widows of officers, ti'e was confident that he spoke the sentiments of the coiner] when he said, that that was one of the very last points. upon which the country would wish to see retrenche' anent—(Hear, hear). The trifling pittance which was; paid to those who lost their best and dearest protector& in the service of their country, would never be gives . with reluctance or regret—(Hear, hear). Mr. A. DAWSON said that the House would rinly act with salutary caution if it carefully inOlted into What was the incoinc. ci t e he cianitty..befescit gave its sanction to enormous andirwitanstotww•cosablishments, He most sincerely hope& tit/it:101,11e* Onverienent would not continue that iticistrui 's syjteiti of. running intidebt, and then providing at. Acuity occasioned by means of a Loan, or the issue of Exchequer Bills. The plan of voting the establislimewto . -fiyie.,..and then looking for the means to support them, hecould compere only to the conduct of a foolish Gentleman, who first fixed that he would have such and such equipages, and then inquired if his income would support them ! Mr. HUME said that he was astonished to find that the Hon. Member for Wareha m bad: so 'etiisPletell 41- tered his opinion as to the merits of the Sinking . Fond. By the declarations of some of the new Lords: of the 'reasury, who had been so much complimented by his Hon. Friend, that fund Was confessedly a farce, and he therefore hoped that the Right Hon. Chancellor of the Exchequer would :at once bring in a Bal to do away with it altogether. • Mr. CALCRAFT explained. He. had not in the slightest degree altered his opinion. He had alwas potted the principle of a Sinking Fund, but not ots4 which was to be maintained by borrowing as the pre, sen; one was. Nor was his Hon. Friend less mistaken as to the compliment he had paid to some of the new Lords of the Treasury. - He had spoken of their maiden, unfledged ignorance, and hoped, that instead of pursuin; the old mystifying plan,they would adopt an open intells• giblecourse. He confessed that he had considerable ex pectations of effective retrenchment at the hands of the new Government. With the exception of oneNobleFriend of his, there was no man in existence from whom ht should expect so much as fiom the Duke of Welling ton. lie entertained the highest respect for the Noble Lord who was at the head, of the late Administration, ,but as he could not keep his place—as the late Ministers had been turned out, and he ,was sorry for the circum stance, they must Jo the best they could with the team they had. The Amendment was .thea put from the Chair, and the House divided, when there appeared— For the Atneminient . . . 16 Against it 106 The originalanotion was accordingly carried.— Resointioas grant. ins the different items were then put and agreed to. ORDNANCE ESTIMATME. confidence and praise from the Hon. Member, he would inform the Committee that there had been a reduction . of 290,0001 from the year . 'lB2O, is compared with the year 1827. And tha: reduction had been effected ' without weakening the military powers of the Ordnance in any degree whatever. One of the items was 240 clerks, by whose discharge 47,0001. were saved. But the military efficiency of the Ordnance had not merely been maintained, for the military corps had been in creased by 700 men, and the same improvement was made in other respects. For instance, to the military works only, 50,0001. were'devoted in 1820, while the Duke of Wellington at once devoted to them 90,0001. Mr. HUME heartily thanked the Hon. Officer for the information he had given the House. It was indeed the most severe criticism be had ever heard upon the pre decessors of the Noble Duke in office. But what a prospect did the informations hold out to the House, when it appeared by the Estimates for the present year, that on one single item, the civil establishments at the Tower and Pall Mall, 51,9611. were charged for that which was done in 1792 for 18,7001. He thanked the Hon. Officer, and was glad to find that the correctness of all his (Mr. Hume's) positions with respect to re trenchment, was at length allowed.' The Question was put and agreed to.—Tht Chairman was then ordered to report progress, and the House resumed. The Report was ordered to be received on Monday next.—The other Orders of the Day were then disposed of, and the House ad journed at Tea o'aock. LAW INTELLIGENCE. Sir H. HARDINGE said, that it was not his inten tion to do any thing more than, to ask for a vote of clio, slit for a portion of the Estimates. The Estimates had not been prepared by the present Government, but by its predecessor, and no new nutter had been introduced into it. He should-also further state, that no new work - , except thosealready in progress,sand which had.xeceived the sanction of the Ikuse, was introduced. The vote therefore requested, would only enable Government to carry into execution plans which had been already dis kussed and agreed to. At a future period,the whole of the Ordnance Estimates would be brought before the House is the topiary/ay, whenever,. item might be discussed, owl as ;he present vote was essential to the carrying on of ,the.public service, and Would not pledge any one to a particular course in future,iii•trusted thus the Com mittee would agree to it without, diiinssion—(Hear). He then moved— " That the sum of 783,598 i.. be rained to his Majesty (+ashcan= it the espenditure of the Ordnance Departneent for the year 1528." Mr. HUME said, that he putrefy rose for the purpose of mini that he should not oppose tbi yet. upon the understanding that he did not agree to the Estimates. e mr, CALCRAFT said, that he really thought. that, the .Orthaance.E,tintates were the. least exceptionable, and that the. Committee might with great propriety agree to the vpte proposed. He remembered that two or three years after the Duke of Wellington was placed. at the bead of the Qtlinagee„ he (Mr.,Calcraft) went . minutely through the. Esttoiatealur that gigillisneatt and they appeared to bias. to be made opopfts low a scale as possible, consistent with,the .wogare of the country ; and that recollection•was to him an earnest of the efficient retrenchment which he hoped would soon be visibleja the Estimates for every othes Depirtinent. Sir H. HA KDINGE said, that . innder to shew. that the Duke of.WellinglC4l hhd received no mute. than just . ..... COURT OF COMMON PLEAD, Fsa. fittings after Hilary Term, before Mr. Justice PAIL and a Special Jury, nt Westminater, CRIM. CON.TYRIIIELL •. ST. AUBTAT. This was an action to recover compensation for the injury sustained by, the.plaintiff in consequence of the alleged criminal conversation between the defendant and the wide of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded Not Guilty. • Mr. BRODRICK opened, the pleadings. Mr. Sergeant WILDE stated the case to the Jury. The present was an action commenced by the plaintiff, who was the son of a highly respectable man, Sir John Tyrrell, Baronet,- against the Reverend Humphry St. Aubyn, to recover •compensation for the injury he had I suffered from the seduction of his wife. Unfortunately: ' cases like the present had of late years become so frequent, that it would be quite unnecessary for him to , do any more thaAstate the circumstances on which the, claim of the plaintiff was founded. The plaintiff was. the eldest son of Sir John Tyrrell, Bart. and the member of . a noble family residing .in Ram His wife, whose Conduct had .given occasion to the present painful in quiry, was the daughter of Sir Thomas Pilkington. She was possessed ,of, considerable intelligence and many accomplishments. Their marriage had taken place under circumstances the most likely to procure lasting happiness to those who were thus united. They were both in possesfann of an ample fortune, and were both persons of highly respectable rank. He was just four- • and-twenty, and she was something more than nine teen, She. had freely. admitted his addresses, and .yielded to thaw and the consent and approbation of both had.• been obtained. The Marriage took place in 1819,. and the present lamentable transaction had taken. plase ;A-N.o43am They were thus married eight yea,u. During that period, she bore him five chil dreg-Titer, bOys,andAree girls. The two former died, and the think lattmaesenow.left to deplore the guilty r conduct of their misguid.ed• mother:, In 1825, Sir J. ;Tyrrell badshimmisfortune-tor lose. his Lady, and then &r John pre d: tislit'Ae it seine to him in the decline 'of life, his eon apd . his so!'" wife and childien,should 'come and reride at bi 4 residence in Boreham. The offer was willingly,andsgladly accepted. In the course of 1824 Mrs. lynch paid a vi-it to her mother, Lady Pilkington, and there she first became acquainted with the defendants tNoirroof-could be found that they had ever 'met.more than twice. •Up to the moment of her elopement, not the slightest suspicion was entertained on the part of any person that the connection had been form ed between her and the defendant. Sir John kept a poney chaise, in which she was in the habit of riding to Chelms ford, and in which• Sir John frequently accompanied her. She always •drove.. On the 19th of Nov. last, as the day was exceedingly fine, Sir John proposed that. they should drive to Chelmsford. She said that she was very willing, as she had her milliner to pay. They went thither, and when they arrived, they accordingly sepal.' rated. They agreed that they should meet again at a• Miss Phillips's, in the town, and then return to Bore ham. Whets Sir John. called at the appointed place .she was .not sliere, nor had she been there. Sup posing she had walked on homewards, he drove that way. He, however, reached Boreham without meet ing her. He then returned to Chelmsford ; but after a number of very paiticular inquiries, no tidings could be heard of her. It was at length discovered that she had been seen walking vet y fast towards a carriage near Chelmsford, . accompanied by a woman with a .bundle. She was thence traced to Jaunny's hotel, in ,Leicester Square, .where she was found in company with her seducer. From that time forth they had lived, and still lived, in. open adultery. As to the mode in which .communication had been carried on between the defendant and the plaintiff's wife, no proof could well ye given; he was an utter stranger to the plaintiff. It would, however,.be given in evidence, that the defendant Thad been seen at Ungar disguised as a pedlar, very shortly previous to the elopement. These were the facts which he should lay before •them in evidence; and when he had done so, he should feel himself en titled to demand at their .hands a full compensation in damages. .The Learned Serjeant then called the fol lowing witnesses . Thnmas Frost Jebb produced a copy of the register of marriage of the 19th of April, 1819. John Miffs Tuffnell, Esq.--I was present at the marriage of the plaintiff; I am uncle to the plaintiff's wife; 1 gave the brideaway ; It was ainarriage with the . full consent of the two families;- Mr. Trail is the, eldest son of Sir J. Tyrrell; the plaintiff and his wife have frequently.been at my house; their two sons ate dead; they lived together perfectly happy ; Mr. T. always appeared kind and ailketionate towards his wile; they continued to visit me and I them almost up to the time of the elopement ; .I saw no apparent change. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant Canes—The plaintiff's wife was a ward is Chancery at the time of her marriage ; her fortune was 45,0001. I had not frequent opportunities of seeing them when at way house; they lived at Fitz-place- tit) the time of Lady T.'s death ; he was very much in the habit of hunting, but I think not See days bras week; Mr. T. didorisit at Lady PilkingtenT; Fits place it in Essex, about twelvemiles from Sir J. Tyrrell's. • Mrs. William Tuffuell; I am the wife of the Rev. William TufFnelliand am connected with Mn. T. by marriage; I have known her ever since she was born - ; I was at the marriage; I have met-Mrs. I'. occasionally since I have -seen them twice to .;ether, and. they alqrays seemed happy ; I now live in Suffolk 4. I 'visited Lady Pilkingtoa on one occasion, and saw Mr. St. Aubyn; I never saw him speak to Mrs. T. Mr. St. A. is about thirty years old I shoubirthink ; I dined with:thoun on that occasion. Cross-caalained —Another of Lady- P.'s daughters is married to a man named Rennet; I learned on that occasion that it was the Ant visit of Mr. St. Aubyn ; Mr. T. was. not there then. Mrs. Ducaine—l am the wife of Major Dwaine, who resided at Nesting formerly ; I knew the plaintiff and his wife ; I think they appeared to live on the most affectionate terms; I knew them particularly in 1824; j)qtys seen them at Colchester, where I now Ireside, and tit thfre seemell on the same terms. Mrs. ARI I raids at Chelmsford; I knew the plaintiff and his wife, and freqpently staid with them:h i rr4aerm thin= but the gi-eatest tegetd and‘aectia befirie Crowe:ambled—l hare•staid time. • fear. or Is date tardier in their house at Fitz place ; the last. time I wa there wAs lo May, 1825; I visited them in the same year at BOrellaitp. • Mrs. Judith Clark—l live at Chelnisford wth my sister—the last witness; I have frequently been on a visit at the plaintiff's' house. He and his wife always seemed 011 the best terms; I du:night Mr. T.. 1 most affectionate husband; in last August 1 was on a .visit at &reham for three nights, and their happiness seemed the same. His affectionate conduct remained the same. Sir John Tyrrell—l reside at Boreham House, in the county of •Essex. I was present at their marriage in 1819; they had two sons, and three daughters; plaintiff is my eldest son; he seemed on the best terms with his wife; in 1225 I had the nikfortune to lose Lady Tyrrell, and some time after, on my propoacion, they came to live with me. Mrs. T. seemed remarkably plea.ed with that proceeding; they continued at my house till Mr.. T. left it ; they always seemed on the best terms, except on some occasions, when slight altercations arose as to the treatment of the childrgn when they were ill; she thought him over anxious about them. I should have thought nothing of this. had I not been called on here, ou my oath, to state all I knew. The age of the eldest girl Is six years; I sever .saw the defendant in my life ; Mrs.T. went toChelms ford very frequently; when the weather was fine she went in a pony-gig, in which she drove me; I had it built on purpose to please her; during the three months previous to Novetni-er last, and more particularly during the last fortnight, her visits were more frequent to Chelmsford ; when we got there we separated, bin with the intention of returning together; about the 19th nf.Nov. it was proposed by me to go to Chelmsford, because it was a very file day ; this was between 10 and 11 o'clock ; she said she would be very glad to go, as she had some particular business to do there, which she said was to pay a milliner ;in one part of the fray she drove very fast ; I told her there was no hurry; we separated at Chelnis ford ; and I was asked by her to call for her st Mrs. Phillips's; she said if I did not find her there, she would have walked on, as shit thought the exercise would do her good ; I called at Mrs. P.'s about four or five o'clock ; I did net find her there.; I found that she had not been there; I returned towards home, and found that she had not returned home ; on this I met my son returning (rem hunting, and then I returned to Chelmsford and inquired at all the places where I thought it likely to find her, but could not; On this intelligence my son appeared extremely agitated; he accompanied me to Chelmsford; in three or four days, information was obtained of her; it was supposed she had either gone to Lady Pilkington's, or her sister's, Mrs. Bennet, in Suffolk ; my first intelligence other was from a woman who carried letters; soon afterwards I came to London. Cross-examieed--Mrs. Bennet's •house is about forty-two miles from my house ; their only differences were about the children ; do not remember the remonstrating of Lady T. with my sin, for harshness towards his wife ; my son might be 24 years old wimp be married. French Jiumay—l am the master of Jaunay's Hotel, Leicester square; I remember, on the 20th November, .a Lady and Gentle man came to the hotel in a hackney coach. with a servant; it was in the evening; they gave the name of Mr. sod Mrs. Johnson; they engaged two bed-rooms, a dressing-room. and a sitting-room ; there was a communication between the two bed-rooms; tweidays after, a Gentleman came and asked to be introduced to Mr. John.. son, after he had described him; I introduced him into the room ; they went away on the 24th. _ Thomas Archer—l am well acquainted with Sir John and Mr. Tyrrell; lam clerk to the Magistrates of the Chelmsford Did lion, and have been so fourteen years; un the 21st November I cante_to town, in consequence of a communication from Me, Tyr. mil; I remained in town two days, end on the third day I went t 6 Woodford; I afterwards found Mrs. T. at a hotel in Leicester-square; I saw her there with Mr. St. Aubytt • I ad dressed her, and told her I had cone frone the fatuity in !Essex ; I told her she must be aware of my mission, and I was eery sorry to he its bearer; she was confused, and I believe could not fpeak to me ; Mr. St. Aubyn wired his hand, and she went into •an adjoining room; he then • timed to me, and 'offered me a chair; be is thirty-five or thirty-aix yeire old; •he • left the room for a very short time with her; I said when he returned," I believe I am addressing Mr. St. Aubin," as I did•not know , him; he - *Yid," Yes; " I gave him ray name ; I said," This ia a verytumlea sant business on which I have come to you; ColunerTyrrell ethe plaintiff) has sent me hereto take Mrs. Tyrrell. if possible; front this place ; I ant deputed by • Mr. Charles Tyrrell and Mr.. Mule L who are in the house, to request to have private communication. eretb Mrs. Tyrrell ;" he sell, he dill not believe Mrs. T. 'could see them ; I advised him to goand ask her; he went, and on hi* return . saicrher spirits. would not enable her' to see them ; I advised bins ter let her retire to another. house, where she might remain untnedellued for a few days ; be said he could not do that ; I said, " entre:lye measures must then be used, and,she must betaken front your,* said, " that would be' very ridiculous . on the part of Colonel Ar; reH, and the laugh would be =nets against hint ; he has gm a • fortune, and I have got his. wife. Ido not mean to•part and she will never leave me or. give. me up." I urged the geeing her up without coercion ; he paused and said," the lane:swill then be against me." I said this was not an answer I should expect under the circumstances ; he said he hid dune nothing to blush for; if I had sneaked down and taken away one of the d:ijs K ia. ter' for the sake of her fortune, they might have binned use. I spoke of Mr. Mule's, and said he had met Mrs. T. there. fie said that was the worst part of the ease. He said, hefeh '.bat his conduct must have hurt that Gentleman very much. said; ;bat on the score of morality he surely ought to feel soMething. said, " Oh ! my.notiont of morality'differ greatly from 1144 of meaty in the world." I said, " You are a Clergyman, and a bone. (iced ene;" his answer was, " Oh ! I know all about that ; that is one of the chances I had to encounter;. I did not enter into this battle without calculating smite et - iti tiska." I told him, as I could get no ezpUcit answer I Must retire. . Cross-examined—l ant a Conveyancer, and a Member of an Inn of Court ; I kept the prison arCkelmsfdrel, seiintlears ago. I be lieve I have omitted nothing material of .the conversation. , Aubyn said, Mr. T. had not used his wife well; he did noesey she was very miserable; he said she hid never loved .plaintiff, and, be had used her very well ; I had no Conversation with the Lady k Mc. Medawar Introduced to Mrs. I'. There wai. a letter Seel to her from:Mr. Charles Tyrrell, to which she replied:. .•: ••' •: Alison Kerr—l was Chambermaid at.the Hotel in Leicester square; Mr. and Mrs. Johnson slept in the same bed, 1 A letter was here put in from Mrs. Tyrrell 'tit her husband„, in the month of May, 11125, to skew the , mints on which the/ listed together.., Throughout 'expressions of the (oddest description were employed towards him. • • • . • • • William Jackson—l am a waiter at the Crown Inn, at Ongar; I remember a man like a pedlar coming to the inn; be •bad a lass , bet on his arm; his beard was long ; I thought there was schnething petrel in his manner and speech; he bad a bed there; inytioistress se first did not like to take him in; he went 'away in the morning, after breakfast, 10 a horse and gig ; his hands were like a gentle. ma's bands; he gave me sixpence when he went away ; Lsaw bins `male weeks after, l' think, when he was dressed like a gentleman ; be came then in a chariot with post horses ; he ordered horserto go IS the next morning to Chelmsford; I never saw him afterwards. Joseph Batty—l drive the post-horses at Ongar k I remember driving a' Gentleman on Monday morning, in November, to the Nall, at Rittle, which is about three mites from Chelmsford; be bad a servant riding behind; he staid to breakfast' at Riede; he told use to follow him' on the Chelmsford road, in about. three quarters of an hour • at a place called Onebridge Waterie I OW the Gentleman; and be- cold sae to stop at the top of a hill; he wee; away, and I saw soon after a Lady and a Gentleman coming to me; they govfn. and I drove them to Epping 'Place, whence they took homer to Woodford; they were about a mile from Chelmsford, when they first got up. • . ; • _ •••• Francis Leet, a waiter, at Epping-place, in November.. prOved that the defendant had stopped with a Lady at that house, and proceeded on the London road: • • ** John Chapman, a farmer, in Essex, saw a carriage standing on bill, a few yards from the town of elmsford, and soon.after saw Mrs. Tyrrell walking very fast towards the carriage; she. had :a *Oman with her carrying' wo bundles. Dr. Badeiy—l am the family physician at Sir John Tyrrell's ; the plaintiff and his wife always seemed, since their marriage, oo 'be best terms; Mr. T. was a very kind husband. . .• . Mr. Henry Bird, a surgeon, at Chelmsford, deposed, to the same effect. ' Mary Uaderwood, the head nurse in the family of Mr. T. tapas berated the testimony of the last witness. : a • . . " Mr. Hopper proved that the plaintiff, on elopement, llJth wife. wai distressed in the extreme. Mr.an in co Scott; a solicitor, in ther,prove ocddtiheetle of irte thedeafeneda:i n defendant sinfu the•lr; iv 4 Crow stit o r iel were about 4001. per e g oism.; the remind the gbbeitiodeBollol3k 901. he is not the eldest son of SirJoho Sta.',Anlet4.,phe gre e oo4 the defendant to his living. , • • , • This wee the . , , ,• ; . • 4 • Mr. Sergeant, (Arose; on the pan Of lite:defeho:Orit. expressed a hope, that the Jury woad .; not be 1n tided to allow their sninds'Ab fie betrayed ssiliol radhtt44.4 by the powerful ess'ikjkii .14ar t ie l d 4 11* chain did not c ftit. t 4 Pinot* idti a ttirs4 tioning"the right of plaintiff 'tprccive a verdi . their hands. He - was coniitseed tzf the itniirOpibtfof his concict, and . had noii„Oikre tai.;"as;urt tcusttit4lit with contrition to the decis.ttfn,of the Jovi. • With rt. spect to the tnorality or iasniOsalit r y of his client's Cop. duct, the Jury were 40i t 4 calm th c at part of the case into their consideration, That was for another and it ".",711 oe xo is Rd sp be ill ad T i p na an