Star. — London, England, 1827-11-09 00:00:00

~- - • z -- . --.. ..~ ,: . I V _~~ * g • * . • IA . -....... 4 01 _ 1' . ..,: • 1 ' • 4 4j i tiO t W 5.w 1. 3 : 1, 0 .41, • . 4 . -..- A: . • „. ~ ,• 4 :- / \ . . 1 i 0 tii . , i . 1 1 s k - " 4 , -ay • -, ;10 1 X 4 .../0 r• - \ ... ilk OF .. . P 1 •: FRIDAY EVENING, NOVERB NumBER 12,711:] 1827. TO SCHOOLMASTERS, CLASSICAL TEACHERS, &c. A SPECIMEN of the NEW EDITION of &INS. WORTH'S LATIN DICTIONARY, improved by Dr. JAMIESON, may be had gi c r a t a is) on applicatioa to the Pubtleisen o r se lay Bookseller In the d o m. Published by Moen, Boys, and Graves (Successors to Hurst, . Rainsaa, sad Oa) 6, Pali-mall. Laotian, in eve. price /.se. bound, with t he fall usual allowance to &book said Teacher& the ehtme le the only complete Ivo. Edition which contains a the Words in the Latta-English part al the 4to Dicdoaary. white General of Russia, has called together the prin cipal Russian overdub established in this city, and has communicated to theist a letter from M. de Ri beaopierre, Russian Ambassador at Constantinople, dated the 12th, of winch the following is the substance: moan a landlord and tenant had been dismissed, on the ground that a Court of Law was the proper place fot iavestigsting such asedunts and deciding such dif ferences. M. Parrs, on behalf of the plaintiff, contended, that the accounts between the plaintiff and the Noble de fendant were of such a complicated natufb that they could never be settled by an action at law. By the agree meat between the parties, the plaintiff was to have a: per cent. for his agency, on the met rents of the mate. It was inspossibte to sicertain deafly what the net rents Aran, except by such an investigation as a Court of lathT Could alone afford. It was also stated in the -that there was a distinct understanding bet weenthe flitiatiff and defendant, that the rent of the said farm *sold go towards the liquidation of money that had " The refusal of the Porte to accept a mediation has certainly rendered the relations of the Allied Powers with the Sultan more difficult. These difficulties, how. ever, are not of such a nature as to give cause to the alarming reports that are in circulation. " The actual circumstances require, nevertheless, that the subjects of his Majesty the Emperor established at Smyrna should use a certain degree of circumspeetice in tbeie commercial undertakings." Since the publication of this notice the accounts much more satisfactory. • AROMATIC SPIRIT OP VINEGAR. trHIS agreeable perfumed liquor (the original in- J. %within of Mr. Henry) which Is of weft-known efficacy In 'ypiirelng Faintness and Head-ache, and in counteracting the stints of over-heated, close, or infected air, continues to be pro wed, in the greatest perfection, by Messrs. THOS. and WM. .11IENRY, blimufactoring Chemists, Manchester. It is sold in "Loodoe, wholesale and retail, by Messrs. &may and Bum, pefonsers, Cortspor-street ; and Retail, price its. !M. by one siert sr more in every principal Town ; but it cannot be genuine, vows the names of the above preparers are engraved on the Goternment stamp, which is tied over the cork of each box.— p ro p el Sponge Bons aro sold by Bayley and Blew, as usual. As abort may aims be had, anthenticated by a similar stamp asses CaLcures MAsassagt, la bottles at as. 9d. or with gloss suppers at h. 641. T_RKRE LOOKING GLASSES .— HENRY L. 14 COOPER. 93, Sithegegate-street W)thin, respectfully sub ro the Nobility and try, the following lot of 6ne BRI TISH PLATES, of superb dimendeoe, at the greatly reduced wile of Prices aesnezed t t a. d. 1 Silvered Piste . • 190 Inches, by 61-66 3 0 1 Do. . • . 110 . . 57—.69 3 9 1 Do. • •-• 105 . . 60-69 13 10 1 Do. II • • 99 • • 56.--.53 10 6 Do. . • . at . . 61-47 19 0 1 Do. • ". • 95 . • 46-33 7 0 I Do. • - • • • 119 .• • :96-44 14 6 1 Do. • • . TO • • 6 5 -40 1 4 5 11'o. • . . 74 . . 61-41 15 4 1 Do. • . • 79 . . 1119-1-99 0 0 1 Do. • 72 . . 10 •• • 1 Do. . • . 74 . . 111 0 1 Do. • • . 74 . . 44-45 9 0 I Do. . . . 63 . . 48-23 17 0 I Do. • •• . 64 . . 61.-25 10 9 1 Do. . . • 69 . . 511--.15 14 6 'Gimes Bathed to order, of any ,dimensionse Nivered or on evered, for Conservatories, Sashes, Drawing and Ming-rooms, eke. frem the least sixes to the magnificent. tosamirement of Orie Hundred and Slaty Inches by Seventy-two, forwarded to any part of the United Kingdom, by careful Workmen. Where required.— Fresno for the above, elegantly end richly carved. 41.0, Tor urea Guises, of handsome sins, and in Frames of the most modern design,. The fashionable and improved French Sash . Dows, completely fitted op either in. Ground, Stained, or richly primed Glasses. Designs and Estimates furnished for any Architectural Improve- ments in which Rine Glass, now become se tedOeshie• may be in. undated with appropriate effect.—No. 93, BishepsigutisitreetWithin. FRENCH PAPER* 1110. K TYR AIOIIITICITOF MO% 6; • OFFICIAL FART. " ROYAL ORDINANCE. aisrles,hy the Once of Goo, King of France and Navarre, to ante whoa► these presents shall come, greeting. 4 We have otdalned and do ordain as.joilems7 " Art I. Are raked to the dignity of Peen of the Kingdom, the Stun—Comte de bfontbianc, Archbishop of Tours; Comte de Bruit, Archbishop of Abby; Comte de ?dorlhon, Srehlgalsop of Audi ; Comte Morel de Mons, Archbishoi of Avignon; Comte de Pins, Archbishop of Amasie; Comte de Divas= ; Comte Alex-' ander de St. Aidegoode ; Marquis de Monteynard; Comte Eugene de Vogue ; Comte de Mestnejouls ; Marquis de Leek Mirepoix ; Comte de Peaks. ; 'Marquis Rionit de Renville; Marquis de Con. Sun; Ceinte de Moen! Doglike; Zdarquls de Maemahon; lassies Laure); Peerage de Groan:de; Coiner de Kergeriou ; De %Res Comte (Mae (Henri); Merv* do Radepont ; Comm dela Protean ; Comte Rude de Gmbriant ; Marquis de Meier.; Vincent de Cettelbs/ae ; in Melba le Dec d'Esclignac ; Bares Sures de Cousseigiase) Comte de la Yiesvllle ; Marquis de Lin eman ; Ceram Rolle dlinfat ; Comte . Octave de Qqinsonnas ; Marquis de lkolsesrd Marquis de Coestarvel; Census Humbert *Smashups; Marquis de Colbert Chabannals ; Marquis de Dam. lie (Elk Louis Amer); Coasts Rene de Bernie ; Marquis de terse: Comte Louis de Kergolay ; Comte de Toequevlbe ; Vi nare de Relate Maure ; Marquis de BaDly de Presoak; noire node k Mareehal Prince de Holten/eke Butenstein ; Comte iriamaran; Comte Dohnedetu ; Costa d'Holbellse ; Comte Al« While Chan:al; Pince Pierre d'Arograbergt Comte Maurice de Dram; Dr fr!atiNy ; . Prkste de Berghes Saint Wine& (Charles Alynake Desire Butes') ; Marquis de Trameeourt; Comte de dal Comte de Pontgibeau tlfaieneVictoire Demon); Comte (Midden ; Comte d'Aibon ; Marquis de Mastic Chatenok ; Marquis de Beaurepaire ; Marquis de Leek, (Guy Henri Joseph Therese); Baron de la Boullerie; Olivier ; De la Personae ; nitre cncaia k Prince de Monemorenel; PIMA de Maquille ; Comte Iloequart de Turtot ; noire comb le Prince ele Croi.Soke; Coate I Adrian de Rouge; non cousin k Marechal Souk, Dec de Dal.. rusk; Marquis d e G oorgues ; Marquis de Forbin des foists ; 'inane de Cumin; De Sapinand ; Marquis de Ma niere de' )iertlarille ; Comte Berthraod de Lur-Saluces; Comte de Ss zones; Canticle Nansoutis " An. 2. The dignity ei Peer of the Kingdom. whisk we have e pleased to confer on the persona owned in the present ordi °ma, Ad be hereditary only on condition of their instituting • misroc,Prodeeleg a net revenue of at least 10.000 francs, arising iron real estates. "Article lofthe ordinanda of the tftit of August, 1317, is dis- Mind with in regard to them. " Art. s. The President of the Conned of Ministers, and our Seger of the Beak, Minister Secretary of State for the ilepartmeot hide*, ate charged, each as far as he is anteernod, with the Ihn "tke:si the present ordinance, whkk shall be inserted in the ialletin at the Laws. "" et Paris, in our Palace et the Tamil% the sth of Nev. 3 "; woe the (with year of our mks. (Simi) " CHARLES. .(Countersigned) " J. DE PILULE." PROM THI (MUTT* DZ FRANCS, woe. 7. PARIS. Nov. s. Letters horn Vienna say—The Chevalier de Tatia. Russian Ambassador to the Court of Vienna, has . leave of absence, andis going to Russia. The departure of this Minister during the itegotiations tat the affairs of the East, has caused much here. M. de Maiandoeff remains as Chump' , ffaires during his absence. • , - • Countess Dowager de Solages has jest died at of La Verreric de Mays, near Albi, at tie age Mrs, nine months, and 21 days. At dv,ef did the honour s o f h er h ous e in the mostellffigili 4 r) and enjoyed perfect health. ,e.te r d ay M. Saran was chosen Member of the Aca. Scier.ces, in the room of M. nests& SMYRNA, as:. 16. Questiaur, Consul General of Austria, actin capacity of Charge d'Affaires of the tot. Pi Lotter their R u is ohtai i o o d a, Overton I r y to th boo hen d'Affaire s The her seat c of lag y e poked tan ner , Teter V. deity of M. Q le• in the FLANDERS MAID. 81t038111.5, livrapans S. We have Mart of various deaden tamed -Morin on the night of the Slst of October. Great mage was done to the fishing boats at Schematinger4 l and among other accidents we hear of the loss of a steam boat, bound from Amsterdam to London, with passew gers ; but we hope that this report will oot be confirmed. Nov. 4.—Yesterday arrived at the Hord d'Angle term, a hearse, containing the mortal remains of Mr. Moore, an English Gentleman, who died in Frantfort, and which his family has ordered to be conveyed to England. The hearse was followed by three post carriage!. A lit itish Cabinet Messenger passed through this city last night. on his way from LoAdon to Vienna with dispatches. We have accounts which mention wrecks of ships which were thrown on the coasts of the Texel, on the lst of the month, and also a brig which was stranded ; but they say nothing of the accident reported to have occurred to the steam boat from Amsterdam to Lon don; so that we hope that this repot t will prove false. Nov. s.—Ftom the frequent passage of Cabinet Messengers, it is to be presumed that some important negociatien is on foot. Nov. 6.—We observed yesterday that the Northern Jour.ials did not mention the loss of the steamboat bound to tendon, and those we hive since received are still silent on the subject; bqt the Courier de la Meuse gives the following articles " We have just beess'shewn the extract ora letter from Amsterdam of the 2d instant, which giaes the afflicting news of the total loss of the steamboat from• Rotterd — ain to London; 21:sengers and the whole crew perished. This 1 boly event, respecting which no further particulars are given, took place on Wednesday night, dazing a tempest au the coast of Holland." The Brawls Josenal Ls Beige emirs" tkatshis news requires confirmation, as the Amsterdam' Journal of the 4th of November doss sot mention it. • The departure of the cause de Cello to Royal is delayed for some days by a fresh attack of the gout, which, however, it is hoped will soon be over. LAW INTELLIGSSeg. COURT OF CHANCERY, No% & 002011/11 NOR SOMI Mr. DAsum. moved that a day might be fixed for hearing this case. It was arranged that it should come oa at the first :notion day. PHIPPS V. LORD INNISMORIL Counsel were heard in this cause upon an appeal frau a judgment of the Vice• Chancellor. The subject of the suit was the validity of a trust in the marriage settle , meta of Lord Ennissoore's daughter with Major Balders. l The party claimant was entitled to an annuity charged, on the estate of which the disputed trust was declared, l and be insisted that the trustees bad no right to receive and appropriate the rents for the purposes of the settle mem, otherwise than subject to his charges. The LORD CHANCELLOR said he would coisslder thei cue, and give judgment at a future day. VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, biomass% S. 1110ADU V. LORD SILSIY. The plaintiff in this case, who had for many years acted as steward, agent, and solicitor, to the family of the defendant, bad advanced several apes of money to the present Lord Selsey, for the purposed enabling the defendant to pay certain legacies which had been left by the late Lord Selsey. The plaintiff and defendant disagreed in 3820 about a farm, which the plaintiff had taken under an agreement. from John. Lord Selsey.- 1 The defendant endeavoured to set that agreement aside. His Lordship brought the matter before the Court of Chancery, where the decree was in favour or Mr. Rhoades. His Lordship then appealed to the House of Lords, where the decision was also in favour of Mr. Rhoades. Lord Selsey took the agency out of the plain tiff's hands so long ago as the year 1820; but the set. clement of the accounts between them, and the payment of a large balance due from the defendant to the plain- tiff, was delayed from time to time; and during this delay, the plaintiff, knowing that the defendant was in debted to him, and for other reasons, had suffered the rent of the farm, which had been the subject of dispute between them, to go into arrear. Lord Macy put in a distress for rent, and the plaintiff then filed a bill, which prayed an injunction to restrain any farther legal pro ceedings on the part of Lord Selsey, and also that an account of all the transactions between the plaintiff and defendant might be taken before the Master. To this hill the defendant had demurred, on the ground of want of equity ow the part of the plaintiff. Mr. Sagirsir, in support of the demurrer, contended, that the plaintiff's remedy was an action of account. Among the whole of the transactions that bad taken place between the plaintiff and Lord Selsey, there was none to call for or to warrant the interference of the tow of Chancery. He was quite sure, that upon a review of those uansactions, there would appear no rea son for departing from the long established practice in matters of this nature, or from the policy which bad al- ways refused an equitable remedy where the Courts of law were open to the person who felt himself agrieved. The Learned Counsel cited cases in support of his ar gument, and especially one decided by the present Master of the Rolls, in which a bit, for an account be. Where the payments woo all on one side, there could be no reason fora remedy in equity. Nothing would be productive of greater mischief to the landed interest of the country than the countenancing of a proceeding which would justify agents, by sling bills in equity, to compel their employers to go into an account of the transactions between them, at an enormous and alto gether unnecessary expense. The demurrer was ac cordingly allowed. COURT OF RING'S BENCH, WIETW2IOI2II, Nov. a. MAJOR Vs HOLD WORTH. This was an action tried before Mr. Baron Pinllock, st York, during the last assizes. The plaintiff, else is the widow of a butcher and graziers near Leeds, sought to recover compensation for the less of the services of her daughter, who had been seduced by the defendant. The Jury found a verdict for the plaiatiff—damages £3OO. Mr. JOHN WILLIAMS now moved for a role to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, on the ground that the damages were excessive. The learned counsel stated, that, in the first place, evidence was given, at the trial to show" that the girl had property to the amount of SOOl. in her own right ; and, secondly, that there wai no proof of the defendant's being a person of fortunt. The only evi -1 (fence adduced in support of that allegation was that. he kept two hunters. Mr. Justice 13AYLIT interrupted the counsel to ob. serve, that the girl, who had been seduced, proved that the defendant frequently deposited in her hands, to be kept for him, notes to the amount of 3,000/. It was like .rise provei by another witness, that the defendant was in independent circumstances. Mr. J. WILLIAMS said, that though the Court should be against him on that point, still he would endeavour to maintain his application, on the ground that the noodosi tiss*aintiff (the anothei) had not been such as to entitle her to recover heavy damages. it appeared that the plentiff had compelled her daughter to go be fore a magistrate and swear her child to the defendant. A woman who could thus expose the character of her daughter, could not be ;supposed to possess any very nice feelings of delicacy or mural propriety. Again, it appeared in evidence, that on one occasion the de fendant had gone to the plaintiff's house in a state of intoxication, and proceeded op stairs into a room where the plaintiff was lying is one bed and her daughter in another. The defendant lay down on the bed in which the daughter was for about half an hour, yet after this conduct, the defendant was allowed to continue his visits to the house. Mr. Justice BAUM' said, it appeared in evidence that the plaintiff quarrelled with the defendant about that transaction, and that he did not visit at the house till after the quarrel was made up. Mr. J. WILLIAMS said he would only mention one other circumstance, to prove that the plaintiff had not bestowed much attention upon the morals of her chil dren. It was proved that her eldest daughter was de livered of a child within a short time after her marriage. Lord TENTS/MILS was of opinion that in ewes of this kind the question of damages was ene peculiarly fit ting for the consideration of the jury. The Court was not in the habit of setting aside a verdict under such circumstances: it should be made clearly apparent that the jury had acted under an improper bias. In the present instance there were not sufficient grounds to authorise the Court to disturb theVerdict.--Rule refused. MR ASSIOVERS OF COX V. LORD BAWARDEIC The ATTORNEY GENERAL Applied for a rule to com pel the plaintiffs to show cause why the proceedings in this case should not be set aside with costs? The plain tiffs had sent to the defendant an account of what they said be was inJebted to the bankrupt's estate. His Lord ship called at the plaintiffs counting.huues and told them he did not owe all the amount claimed, namely ,43/. The plaintiffs, however, disregarded his represen tation, issued a writ, and caused has Lordship to be ar rested at Brighton. Although his Lo:dship and other Gentlemen of respectability told the Sheriffs' officers that he was a Peer,and therefore privileged from arrest, they persisted in taking him, and he wasobliged to find bail. In the writ the defendant was styled, ed Viscount Hawarden," which was of itself evidence that the plain tiffs were aware of his rank.—Rule granted. the Acs 5 length in Lord TENTZEDEM that if ante annexed parts of one was merely did not come Mr. CAMPBELL lagainst the that the %,ornpany, against his , several letters which went ' 200 shares ' instalments s we're sthase Lord T , ccansides IL? 0..0111141116 INS int action for tiff, with Mr. Sergeant cau.e why new trial the Judge. the trial, plaints , being out with * his_ the purpose of shoot fowl, approached of Dawson, whose dog tan from tM house toartaigisim and barked. The dog. however, was returning to the house, when the plaintiff thought fit to fire at it.at the distance of about fourteen yards, by which it was Dawson summoned the plaintiff before Mr. Coyley, and evidence was given as to the value of the dog. Ms. Dawson valued it at 51. Lord TeramenustrarbWhat jurisdiction bad the Ma. situate? • • Mr. Sergeant Btrammt..—He had the jurisdiction en. der the malicious trespass act. Mr. Coyley said he would take the value of the dog, not at :1. but at 111. which, with the expenses, he directed the plaintiff to pay. The plaintiff said he would appeal to the Sessions. The defendant again desired him to pay tbe.3l. and the expenses, and told him if he . did not do so, he "would commit him for three months. .The plaintiff still re fusing to pay, the defendant called in a constable, to whose charge he committed she plaintiff, repeating deo obses ration he had made before, that he would com mit him for three months if be did not immediately pay. It did not appear that the constable touched the plaintiff, but they went out of the room together, and then the plaintiff paid the amount required by the de fendant. In his charge to the Jury. Mr. Justice Little dale said, that though the circumstance of the ease did not amount to what was usually called imprisonment. yet if the Jury thought that the plaintiff was under the restraint of the constable,that was sufficient to constitute imprisonment. To that part of the Learned Judge's di. rectiods he did not object: He, however, went on to at that if the Jury were of opinion that the plaintiff had suf. feted imprisonment, it did not appear that the defendant could is any way justify his conduct. It was that pas sage of the charge of which he coniirlained. Before proceeding further, he begged leave to read a clause in the Act of Parliament under which Mr. Coyley bad acted. It was as follows:—" If any person shall wil fully and maliciously commit any such trespass as aforesaid, every person so offending shall be liable to he summoned before a Justice of the Peace, and io pay to the person aggrieved such sum of money as may appear to such Justice of the Peace a reasonable satis faction and compensation for the damage, not excee i tiz 51. together with the costs ; and in d e f a ult o f payment of such sum, such Magistrate or Justice of the Peace shall be empowered to commit him to garsl for a WWI not exceeding three months." It was argued at the trial that no conviction had taken place in this eases because no record of that fact had heels made. He contended, however, that Mr. Coyley having heard the care, and fixed 31. as the amount of the damage, that must be considered a conviction. Though the convic• Lion ultimately became a record, the first parole state ment of the Magistrate was sufficient fur this case. In 7 East. p. 533, he 'found an authority on this point. The Court was there reported to have said—" As to commitment, it never can be denied that a Magistrate can maim a parole order that the defendant shall be retained in custody until he makes out the warrant of commitment." This authority applied also to the second point upon which he founded his application for a rule, namely. that if the Court should not consider that the plaintiff was actually convicted, still they would be of opinion that under the circumstances of the case the Ma gistrate had a right to detain him until he had finally decided the case. This was a point of considerable general importance to Magistrates. It was well known that Ma gistrates were constantly in the habit of " settling" matters which came before them. Nothing was Snore common than for Magistrates to say to defendants in cases of assault, " We shall be obliged to commit you, .if you do not settle the matter with the prosecutor." He requested the attention of the Court to the principal laid down in Hawkins' Pleas of the Crown, 2d vol. caps 13, sec. 15. It was there stated, " Seeing that In Act of Parliament gives a Justice of the Peace jurisdiction over certain offences, and authority to make out a war rant to bring offenders before him, it cannot but be in tended by the Act also to give him the power incident to all Courts, of committing the parties who .ap; ear before him." ,Now if a Justice of the Peace had that power, he contended that he also had the power of de taining a party before him until the matter in question should be determined. He saw hardly any &Ermine between a Magistrate acting alone, and the Magistrates assembled at Quarter Sessions, where it was the con stant practice to allow parses to speak to each other in the middle of a trial, with the view of accommodating the matter. But if the Magistrates supposed that a defendant meditated withdrawing from the Court, they would take care to detain him. • Lord TENTERDIIN—Was there any conviction Wiw* up in this case? Mr. Sergeant Russm.—No. matter. Mr. Justice Beirtia---Within s. Mr. Sergeant Huhu—Direct!' Lord TESTSRDM:-..IiONF tion took place, unless it was been hit to this defendant on bond. The Learned Coon- i nsta i mel ant. 'lug s ecl that these wets aecoonts which could net chants wl be sad = ") se t ttled by an action at law. Pulth All Mr. fluonast *as about to reply, wises Lord ' Tir ViCt CKAPCSLLOIt said he would wit trpnble rass id es . 0. 4 . It appeared tel him peifect 4 l e t i tiir t that the de- • .•-- is th e had said' -.KA :67 the tieattliedtf." 4f Laid *testy 11114 *kat payments 06 b y ,i; p `Lord treat da• al!, pan of Mt. N Rhoades, and Mr. Rhoades on the pats gistrartC. es i ngen , Lord &hey, the matter would have been different , Justice I , • - •• • l , • . ~, . . . : . N., 1 - 1, , t . . ... t- • ' , • ~ . •••• izt • fw l a. . • .dfi . , • ... ;' ",. j%. . • .:..... ... • , . • a . .:, ~.. 'N .;• ; s .: . . r . d ...:: i totr , r . ..4 % .. .!. • _ . .4 . A* . • . L -.1 4481fi l l" tilt 4 e-- ;:a• ...ft. ..,c_. .. ..,,. - i••• , . ---.4- I , _ - I - - • 4 [PRICE SEVIINPENCE. 67 George 111. and ar gued at considerable I support of his proposition. rearm:ass said the words of • the Act were. ny instrument should be 4' endorsed upon or to" anethee, they should be con•iiered as one iemeemeot. In the present case one deed sly refereed so in another. which he conceived :ome within the meaning of the Act. AMPIELL then contended that the verdict wa s • the weight of evidence, which went to prove plaintiff was a partner in the British- Iron y, and therefore could not maintain an action i his copartners. The Learned Counsel read letters from the plaintiff to the defendants, 'ent to chew that the former was the holder of es in the Company, and bad paid the requisite nts upon them, and that be knew the defend ire merely the agents 'of the Company in the e of the mines. TENTWIDINI said the Court would take time to whether it would grant or refuse a rule. ALDO li? li4/4111441114- Pi an action for false i riseneneat, slaintiff against the defendant, who wa i s v ir l it The cause was tried at Stafford before M r E.trri.enata, and the verdict went for the plaid- i 161. damages. • , i I iergeant Russatt moved for a rule to shrew by the verdict should not be set aside. and .a I granted, on the ground of the misdirection of v. It appeared from the evidence gives on , that the plaintiff, being out with his gme o , for ts. 'llle plaintiff eatetIMIOC • I ..,,, , eoatib bin ecsiltdials? oftshit,-.4.44 . irectly., ....:, • ......, . CA .•.$1,_0,,,, can ere My c h it I anltvon. I La ultimately recordeVuk. • ATTWOOD V. MALL ANDOTIIARS. This was an action brought upon three agreements entered into between the plaintiff, who was the proprie• tar of some iron.mines in Staffordshire, and the defend. ants, for the sale of the mines for the use of the British Iron Company, to recover the purchase money. to the amount of 600,0001. The trial came on at Stafford before Mr. Jdstice Littledale, and the verdict went for the plaintiff. Mr. CAMPILLL moved for a role to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted. The principal ground upon which he re s ted his application was, that one of the agreements received in evidence on the trial was not properly stamped. The deed in question referred to a clause in another deed, and the question was, whether the two were not to be considered as parts of the same deed, under the con• struction of the stamp act? If the Court should be of that opinion, it would be quite evident that the deed would be informal, because it would contain a greater numberof words than The amount of the stamp auiho rind. The Levied Counsel referred to the wordi of