Star. — London, England, 1824-11-30 00:00:00

( LAW REPUB.': ..._........-,_ COURT OF CHANCERY, NOVEMBER 29. OPARANHOU9E. Mr. HART moved for the Court to appoint a ma nager of the Opera-House. After being heard shortly, and o ithout the Court intimating any opinion, the mo tion was ordered to stand over till next 'Thursday, that the Solicitor-General might be prepated to meet it. Mr. HART moved, in another cause respecting the Opera-House, in which Mr. Chambers is the plaintiff, and Mr: Waters and others are the defendants, that Mr. Waters, being in contempt, might be discharged upon paying the costs of the contempt, and that he might be at liberty to take nut a commission to put in his answer, and have six weeks' time for that purpose. Mr. Sum nppostql the motion. I.ordsliip considered that thlre must be some rule of prac tice with revt.ct to this question which be did not know at present. The case was ordered so stand over till the next Seal, that this }Oita of practice may be looked BLAKESIORE 14GLAMORGANSIIIRE CANAL COMPANY. The Lotto CHANCELLOR expressed his doubts on the effect of the alleged contempt and disobedience in this case on Saturday ; but made use of the, opportunity to admonish the good people of Wales, Magistrates inclu sive, not to be quite so ready in their appeals to club law, as the transactions which hal been referred to in this case would indicate. His Lordship, agreeably to his promise on Saturday, determined upon the cases of Griffiths, Routh, Craw shaw, and Guest, members of the Committee, whose commitment had been prayed, that there were no grounds for imprisoning them. Upon the fate of Reece, the filth of the defendants, his Lordship still hesitated, but undertook to give his decision on Thursday morning s , COURT OW KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 29. POLICE REPORTS.—DUNCAN V. THWALTES. • The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE gave jodgment in this cause, which has excited curisidetable interest, inas much as the liberty of making reports from police offices,„ was supposed to be a question the Judges would decide. The plaintiff brought his action against the Morning Herald, for an alleged libel. The publication which became the subject of appeal to a legal tribunal, was a report of an examination which the plaintiff under went before a Magistrate at Bow-street, on a charge of improper conduct towards a young female. The plain tiff complained in his declaration,. that the said report of the examination was false and calumnious. The defendant put in eight special pleas of justification, which set out, in substance, that the report which vies the subject of action, was a true account of that which took place before the Magistrate; that no malice had been entertained, and that a short account of the trans action had been given, because all the details were not fit for the public eye. To these pleas the plaintiff de murred, and the question was most ably argued before the Coon. In the present instance the Court had to decide upon the validity of the pleas. His Lordship having stated the formal matter of the proceedings, said, Mr. Justice Bayley, Mr. Justice Holroyd, and himself, were of opinion, that judgment upon six of the eight pleas must be for the plaintiff; and upon two, namely, the sixth and eighth, for the defendant. One of the six contained the whole of the depositions ; and upon those depositions, the report appeased not to be a correct and fair account of the examination, inasmuch as it did not state the evidence of the surgeon, which plaintiff considered favourable. On the question whe ther reports from police offices of ex parte evidence wete legal ? it was not then necessary to give any dis tinct decision, because there was no doubt, when persons were brought before the Justices, they had authority to take private examinations, and to keep evidence secret for the putposis of justice. His Lordship did not de cide even upon the question, whether reports of proceed ing, ex parte in that Court, were legal? It would be time to decide when the question came under their judg ment. With respect-to malice, the Court were of opi nion, that where an injury was done by the publication of a calumny, malice was to be presumed. The case of Curry v. Walter had been urged as favourable to the defendant's case, but his Lordship upOn that drew a different conclusion. Judgment was accordingly entered for the plaintiff on six pleas, and for the defendant on two. THE KING V. JOSIAS TAYLOR. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE gave judgment in this case. The case came before the Court on a plea of auirPfois acquit, and the question was, whether that plea could be sustained? It was an indictment for a misdemeanour in keeping a common gaining-house. His Lordship cited Various legal authotities to shew that the plea of outrefois acquit .had only been held good in felonies, out of regard to human life ; but in cases of misdemeanour it bad never been admitted. The Court, for that reason, held the plea in bar to be invalid. COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, NOVEMBER 29. DAVIS V. THE BANK OF ENGLAND. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said, that he WAS now to pronounce the judgment of the Court in this import ant cee. It was a special action on the case for a breach ' of duty on the part of the defendants in not paying cer tain dividends to the plaintiff, and also for transferring stock belonging to the plaintiff, without his authority. A verdict was entered for the defendants, subject to the opinion of the Court on a special case. His Lordship here read the facts, from which it appeared that the plaintiff, in May, 1819, had £5,000 in the three per cent. Consols, Boa £5,000 in the Long Annuities, and £I7S in the h.e per cents. on which stock he in that month teceived Ow dividends. On the 6th October and Nth November, Messrs. Drummond received certain instruments put porting to be powers of attorney pro pet ly attested, authorising them to sell out the two sums of £5,000 each ; and ou the 10th of January they re ceived another order to sell out £75, being part of the sum of £l7B five per cents. These nista uments were severally forged and counterfeited. The plaintiff never had any deaiings with Messrs. Drummond, nor ever received any part of the stock sold out by them by vir tue of the said forged powers of attorney. On the :Id of Match, 1820, John Henry Davis, the brother of the plaintiff, was attested on a charge of forgery, and' lodged in Giltspur-street Compter, for the purpose of being taken before the Lord Mayor to be examined; and on the sth of March the plaintiff had an interview with him, when the plaintiff said, " as - you ate charged with a forgery upon a stranger, have you done anything with my property ?" J. H. Davis then told the plain tiff that he had transferred the stock which had stood in the plaintiff's name.. On which the plaintiff observed, out have endeavoured to beggar ine." J. H. 7terwards wt ate a letter ttrMessrs. Druinnwnd, I to one to his brother, desiring them to pay to miff ti.e balance due to him in their hands. On of April, 1820, J. H. Davis escaped from the " then )c ivis Aft enc.osed - the Train the illt t Compter, and got out of the country, and the plaintiff never communicated the disclosure made to him by his brother until after the escape was effected. The com munication was made to him ~n the sth of March, but it was not until the 90th of September that he made it known to the Bank. These were the facts. The first count stated that ten thousand pounds belonging to the plaintiff had been transferred by the defendants, con trary to their duty ; and the third count was like the first, excepting that it included the transfer of £75, being part of £l7B Long Annuities. Thesecond count stated, the plaintiff had not authorised any person to transfer the stock in his name, and the fourth count was the same as the second, only with the difference that it denied all knowledge, on `the part of the plaintiff, of the transfer. The first question for the Court to decide was. x hether the plaintiff's stock had been transferred ? The Court thought that the plaintiff's stock had not been transferred, and that he was entitled to the dividends thereon. He could not, therefore, have a verdict on 'he first and third counts. The stock in which this property was vested was perpetual, and was formed by loans made to the State. Before stock could be trans ferred, the consent of the owner must be obtained in writing. A forged indorsement on a bill of exchange gave no interest in the bill ; and this case was similar. —The Bank of England had no more right to transfer the stock of any person without a consent properly given, than the most insignificant chartered company r had to dispose of the share of any member of it, with out his sanction. The law had provided for the manner in which stock should be transferred. Under almost all the early Loan Acts tallies were delivered, and the indorsements registered in books kept for the purpose. With these indorsements the Bank had nothing to do. These tallies were not in use now, but books were kept at the Bank in which the entries of transfers were made, as prescribed by the Ist of Geo. I. c. 2, sec. 23, and the 4th of Geo. IIL c. 19. His Lordship here cited various cases. The Court were not called upon to decide which of the parties was to bear the loss. The circumstances of the case might create considerable difficulty and in convenience to the Bank ; but the Court thought it bet ter that the Bank should experience such difficulty and inconvenience, than that the stockholder should suffer injustice. The Bank had it in their power to take a reasonable time to make inquiry as to the genuineness of powers of attorney ; but there was no evidence that any inquiry hail been made in this instance. Upon this verdict the Court could not give the plaintiff compen sation for the loss he had sustained, or might have sus tained, from various causes, owing to the fraudulent transfer. Another reason influenced the Court informing their judgment, and that was the operation of the sta tute of limitations. From what had lately occurred, it was certain that transfers of stock might be made under forged documents, and concealed for a period of more than six years; and the statute of limitations began to run from the act committed, and not from the time of its discovery. His Lordship could not find any case, exactly in point, but cited the case of Harrison v. Hai . , rison, reported in Barnardiston, with the opinion of the Lord Chancellor Hardwicke, but added, that it was not there correctly reported, apd that the property in that case was transferred by a trustee, which circum stance accounted for the doubtful manner in which Lord Hat dwicke spoke of the liability of the Bank. The Court were not called upon to decide whether the Bank was bound to pay the dividends to subsequent pur chasers of fraudulently transferred stock ; but the Court, in order to prevent alarm on the subject, would say that the Bank could not refuse to pay the dividends to subsequent purchasers. The Bank kept books for the purpose of correctly managing its business, and it re ceived a liberal remuneration from the public, on that account. If this were not the law, who would purchase stock ? It was impossible to trace the title to stock similarly with that of an estate. It was the practice in making transfers to go by the Bank books. In the pre sent case the Jury had negatived the plaintiff's know ledge of the forgeries until several months after they were committed, and they had also negatived the plain tiff's assent. They had not inferred that assent, nor could they infer it. For these reasons, the Court were of opinion that the verdict must be for the plaintiff on the second and fourth counts. Mr. Serjeant Tsony applied to the Court to have the verdict put in the form of a special verdict. The LORD CHIEF JR.:TIM—If the parties desire it. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, NOVEMBER 29. THE KING IN THE MATTER 07 MESSRS. MARSH, STRACEY,. FAUNTLEROY, AND CO. BANKRUPTS. Mr. HOLT appeared to shew cause against a rule which Mr. Jervis, on the part of the assignees of the bankrupts, had obtained on a former day, calling upon the Crown to shew cause why all matters in difference, relative to an extent which had been issued by the Crown against the property of the bankrupts, should not be referred to the decision of the Remensbrancer. The only question to be decided in the case was, whe ther the Clown was entitled to seize the whole of the money which had been deposited in the banking-house of Messrs. Marsh and Company, as the produce of the assessed taxes of the district of Mary-la-bonne, or whe ther the assignees had aright to deduct from the money so deposited the poundage which was usually allowed to collectors for the trouble of collecting the tales? Mr. Jams said, that the assignees were anxious to save expense to the estate. The monks against which the extent had issued were mixed, part being doe to the Crown, and part private property. Mr. HOLT said, that his Learned Friend was mistaken. It was admitted even by the solicitor of the assignees, that there were no mixed monies. The only point in dispute regarded the poundage. Mr. Baron Gaoaow.—What do you want, Mr. Holt? Mr. HOLT.—That the extent issued may be supported to the ex tent for which it has been issued. bir. Baron HuLLocx.—The amount of the poundage cannot be very larg e. Mr. ssn said, that it amounted to between 3EOOO and £7OO. Mr. Baron lim.Locx.—That is impossible. There must be some mistake. Mr. Jetty's said, that the extent had issued tore-I cover the sum of 1,2191. 19i. 7d. which included not only all that was due to the Crown, but a considerable sum which was due to the collectors for poundage on previous collections. He contended that the Crown should receive all that was due to it, but that the col lectors ought not to avail themselves of the prerogative process to recover money to them individually which they had suffered to remain iii the bankers' hands. Mr. Huta- proceeded to spew cause against the Rule. His Learned Friend (Mr.. Jervis) had been misin sti ucted ; the money against which the extent had is sued, was the produce of one collection only, and did not include any-poundage which had been paid on ac count of previous collections. It was impossible, be maintained, fur his Learned Friend to thew that there was any severed sum on account of poundage. It was l the custom, under the direction of several Acts of Par liament, for the collectors of taxes to take the sums which they collected to Commissioners, who audited their accounts, and directed them to pay into the hands of some bankei the whole of the money which they had received, telling them, at the same tim e, that a certain sum was due to them for poundage. It was on that fact alone that the argument of a severance or appro. , priation of funds on account of poundage could, by any possibility, be founded. But he was prepared with evi dence to shew, if necessary, that the whole of the sums thus paid in by the collectors were carried forward to the nest month's account .without any deduction for poundage. It was his duty to endeavour to satisfy the Court, that the money paid into the hands of the bankers continued ea masse, and that there was no severance.— The language which the Legislature had employed in ,no less than six Acts of Parliament was, that the col lectors should pay to the Receiver-General " all the monies' which they might collect. Upon such. pay ment being made—not upon the collection, the Court would observe—the Receiver-General was empowered I to allow them a certain per centage on the whole sum. I By the Sd of Geo. IV. cap. 88, which was the last Ac• which had passed on the subject of the collection of taws, it was enacted, in order to gentd against negli- I gence or other misconduct on the, part of collectors,' that the per centage which had been allowed them by the Receiver-General might be withheld by the Com missioners of the Treasury, if they saw good reason for withholding it. After reading that Act of Parliament, it was really monstrous to contend that a collector had a lien of three pence in the pound on the money which he collected. It was clear that the whole sum col lected was under the controul, in the fist instance; of the Receiver-General ; and finally, of the Lords of the Treasury. He understood that his Learned Friend meant to rest his case upon the 313th of Geo. 111. which directed collectors to retain three pence in the pound on all the money which they collected. The provisions of that statute had, however, been repealed by those of many subsequent statutes. His proposition was, that the collectors had no right of lien or detention over the money which they collected ; that it was money in transitu ; that it was the King's money, and that the per centage to be paid to the collectors was only a con tingent allowance. Under these circumstances, he saw no reason for referring the matter to the Remembrancer. Mr. JERVIS said, that he was furnished with an ME davit, sworn by Mr. Kearsley, one of the clerks in the late Banking-house, which stated, that the money paid in as the produce of taxes, was usually mired with money standing in the collector's private account. But he (Mr. Jervis) had no objection to take the facts as they were stated on the other side ; for he knew that the solicitor was too respectable to state anything that was not correct. The proposition for which he had to contend was, that with respect to the money which was allowed to the collectors for poundage, the collectors should not avail themselves of the prerogative process to place themselves in a better situation than the other creditors of the unfortunate house in which the funds bad been depOsited. He begged leave to refer the Court to the 43d of Geo. 11/. cap. T6l, see. 79, and the 48th of Geo. 111. cap. 55, sec. 7, where it was enacted that every collector should receive three-pence in the pound on the amount of his collection on paying it over to the Receiver-General. The only object which the Assignees had in view was, to prevent the collec tors from, recovering, by means of the Crown-process, a sum due to themselves as individuals. There was, he believed, no Act of Parliament which directed col lectors to pay in to Bankers the money which they collected; perhaps it would be advisable to pass an Act, requiring them to pay it into the Bank of England ; but that was beside the question under discussion, and upon which the decision of the Court was called for. The' CHIEF BARON observed, that it was a strong presumption against the proposition of the Learned Counsel for the assignees, that no similar case had ever come before the Court, although circumstances similar to those out of which the present application had arisen must frequently have occurred. It must have been only because the parties had thought that such appli cations were untenable that they had not been made. If it could be made out that there was any severance of the money paid in to the bankers by the setting apart of a specific sum for the collectors, the Court would have h:..1 some reason for sending the question before the Remembrancer; but that was not the case. There was no doubt that the persons who collected the taxes and paid it into the banker's were, at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, entitled to a certain per centage . to, 'compensate them for their trouble ; but until that period arrived, there was no distinct sum which could be called the property of the collector. It therefore appeared to him that there was no ground for applying for a refer ence to theßemembrancer. The rule must be discharged. The other Judges, Mr. Baron GARROW, Mr. Baron GRAHAM, and Mr. Bar .n HULLOCK,coinciled with the of the CHIEF BARON.—Ruledisdiarged. - . POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW -STREET. Yesterday, Levi diwakonu, a young man of the Jewish persua sion was brought before Sir RICKAILD Bums, charged with com mitting a burglary, in the dwelling-house of Mr. William Fraser, In Norfolk-street, Strand, under circumstances of a curious nature. Mary Anne Easton, servant to Mr. Fraser, stated, that on Sun day night, about ten minuses past eleven o'clock, she and her fellow-servant went to bed in the front parlour of her master's house, where they always slept. When they left the kitchen the windows and doors were all fastened, and witness left a shawl of her oirn, and a silver spoon, which had been used Aar gruel. Sbe fell asleep, and was awoke, she believes about one o'clock in the morning, by the barking of a little dog which was kept in the house. The dog had found its way from the kitchen to the parlour door, and was scratching and barking there. She spoke to the dog to quiet bins, and ho went down stairs uttering a low growl. In a very short time he was again at the door, barking very violently, and the witness again speaking to him, be went to a mat in the passage, and laid himself down, but still kept starting at intervals and barking. About two minutes had elapsed, when some one came along the passage with a light, and caught up the dog. The animal made a sudden and un common noise, and was then taken down stairs. MI was quiet for a minute or two, and witness opened the patiour door and saw that there was a light in the kitchen. She heard some one say " Hush !" and she immediately called out as loud as she could, " Halloo ! Who's there? Murder!" and, retreating into the parlour, she held the door firmly, while her fellow-servant opened the parlour win dow, and called out for the watch. A watchman came, and wit ness, from the window, saw a man standing on the stone within the area railing. The shawl and spoon now produced she identified as the same left in the kitchen, and a carving -knife, stained with blood, she also said was her master's, and was safe in a knife-box when she left the kitchen. Rebecca Thomas, the fellow-servant, corroborated the statement of the last witness, and said, that when she entered the kitchen, the first object that presented itself was the unfortunate little dog, with its head very nearly severed from its body, and the carving -knife, wet with blood, lying near it. Her master was called up. Robert Newman, a watchman, also corroborated her testimony, and the prisoner was committed for trial. UNION-HALL. Yesterday, Mr. Wolter irombell, formerly an Officer In the Tenth Hussars, and afterwards a Captain in the Life Guards, appeared at the Office, to account for the possession of a chaise which had been stolen. Mr. Harmer attended for Captain Wombell. Mr. Allen, residing in Grosvenor.place, Camberbell, stated, that on the 26th u( Aril last,his coach-house was broken open, and a chaise, together with a quamity of harness stolen. ininen t ri o ., o f the robbery was given at the different Police ()Mts. and after a considerable lapse ul time, the chaise was discovered at Brand's livery-stables, in Stamford-street, Blackfriar's-road, completely m e . tamorphosed, baying undeekone three different coats of paint; however, it was satisfactorily identified by the coachmaker who sold it to Mr. Allen. Mr: Brand stated, the chaise had been placed there at livery by Captain Wernisell. The Captain stated that some rime in the month of M.ty 1.14, h e purchased it in Smithfield of a men named Collins, whose reAdence •be did not know, but he believed it was in Canterbur y ; he made inquiries in order to trace, if possihle,where Collins was to be f oun d, In the edstne of his search he met with a man named Adam s , a bdtcher, in Vaushall.road, who hid sold a chaise of th e a b ove description to the person named Collins. from whirl. he (the Cap t a i n) had bought it. Maass stated, that he had been to examine the chaise, and he supposed it to be the identical one which he sold to ; Collins, about twelve months ago. Mr. Keayes, the co tehmaker, of Blackfriaes-road, said, the chaise in question was on - his p rm i cep at that period, and was not disposed of to Mr. Allen wad ti=e month of April last. Mr. Keayes added, that he was convinced it %yet-n:4 chaise he had sold to Mr. Allen ; he could positively .wear in i t . The Magistrates observed, that Captain Wombell for WI um: sake, should make inquiry after Collins, in order that the iturliara might he apprehended and brought to justice. The chaiie of e ; 1 , c ..„ would be given up to Mr. Mien, trona whom it bad been sto!et,.— The Captain said that be could have no objection, and as he eras t o be the loser, he would do all that lay in his power to trace those who r had taken him in so scandalously. Ili A RLBORMIGII-STB EF.T. H r /Pt. Brookes, formerly a cad to the l'aedington Stages, was y e ,. terday charged with stealing a trunk, the property of Miss Wilbra ham, a daughter of B. Wilbraham, Esq. Nl.P.—James a footman, stated, that on Friday evening, being on the box of his mistress's carriage, in Prince's -street; Hanover-square, 11.• saw two men following a Gentleman's carriage, and at lengths one of them crossed to the foot.pavement with a trunk. Suspecting they had committed a robbery, he followed them into Hanover-square, and there secured the prisoner. His companion made his rs:ape. .—The trunk had s brass plate, with the name of Miss Wilbraham engraved on it. Mr. Tother, a druggist, of into custody, as described. William Boyd, a servant of Miss Wilbraham., stated, that on the carriage arriving at Colston's Hotel, Brook -street, the trunk was gone, and he had seen it safe and secure at Whetstone. The patrol and night-constable prodoced two largel..ather straps, vahich they bad found in Prince's-street, soon after taking the pri soner into custody, arid a large knife and key, found on the prisoner. The key was intended to open the boots ut carriages, for the pur. pose of extracting their contents. The prisoner accounted for possessing the key. by saying he bad lately been in the service of a coach-master, and had used the key in that Gentleman's service.--Folly committed to Newgate for tri.d. W. Land, a youth, who is accused of having robbed his employers, at Brighton, was , on Sunday, apprehended in Itegent-street, on a warrant, backed by the Magistrates of this office, and sent off to Brighton for examination. t, saw the prisoner taken PERILOUS SITUATIM.—Extract of a letter from the proprietor of the Royal Marine Library, Sidmouth ; " On Monday evening . I went to bed, intending to rise early, and prepare against the danger to which I might be exposed at the next time of high water, which would be at half-past seven in the Morning. I could not, how 4ver, sleep after two o'clock, my bed shaking under lase at every surge of the sea, uhish was lashing the 'beach in front with tremendous violenee. At !wit-past five I arose, and desired the cook to light the fire and prepare some tea. It was at this time dark as pitch. I have before said we anticipated no danger before high water : judge, then of my astonishment, on groping my way into the kitchen, to find it already under water. The servant immediately proceeded to lift the things off the ground, and plao them on the dresser and tables. and was thus engaged, when in an instant a dreadful -Nave broke upon us, dashing in at the same moment the kitchen window, the front cellar door, and the kit= ellen entrance next the Fort-field. So great was the rush, that in five minutes there were ten feet water in the house. By Monis goodness, we were enabled to hurry up stairs, where I found my dear boys dressing, in A state of great alarm. Upon our knees we now implored the GREAT DISPOSER of all events to deliver us from the death which appeared otherwise inevitable. I made up my mind to clasp one in each arm, and when the foun dations of my house should give way, to go down toge ther. At this instant we were surrounded by twelve feet of water, which was increasing upon us, and I again repeated '•Gora alone can save save us,' when an empty boat floated ender the window of the bed-room where we had taken refuge. I called upon all to be resolute; and prepared to descend into it by means of the sheets, which I tied together, fastening one end to the bedstead. The rain was falling in torrents; my dear inmates were for some moments too much alarmed to venture in so frail a bark, without oars or any means of guidance; but, at length, they consented. The window was thrown up, the sheets cast out, and we were on the point of abandoning our tottering dwelling, when we were hailed by the cry • Stay, stay I the water is falling Yon are more safe where you are !' and the cheering in telligence soon proved to be correct. I have not power t' give anything like an adequate description of the a wfl,l scene: The sea dashed through the library, breaking down the doors; and part of the front of the house is carried away. Several Gentlemen have kindly received my books into their houses. My pianos, and other (heavy articles, are locked up in the church. Genera) Walker has been so good as to receive my bedding ; and 'my plate, with what is more precious than all, my dear children, are at W. Hodge's, Esq. The whole of the houses on the beach have their fronts broken in, and the town presents all the appearance of having sustained a siege." • DIED. Sunday at Westbourne Green, Doctor Stephen Pellet, Senior centiate of the Royal College of Phyaleiana, In bib 7sth year. NRWGATE Any LEADENii ALL MARK ETS, Nov. 29. Beef 2s 4d to 3s id I Veal 3a 04.1 to 4c 8d Mutton ........4s &I to 3s Sd Pork Ts 4d to 5; 01 .DICES or HAY .4t40 STRAW YESTERDAY. ST. JAUILS ' S• WHITECHAPILL. Hay 51 03 Od to 51 10s Od I Hay 51 lOs to .51 54 05 Clover 51 Os Od to 51 10s 041 Clover 41 lOs to 61 0. 01 StrAW 1119 s Od to 21 8s Od I _±La . 2l_l l . 2± l 2.°1 PRICE OF HOPS. 31111 ?Get ars. wicw ZAGS. 130 s to 168 s I Kent 1204 to 1201 to 14011 &AMA 126 s to 1601 Kent Sussex Essex orpo.es PRICE or TALLOW, SOAP, &c. per 1116. Town Tallow 443 6 d Ditto rough . . ... 19 , 6t . Yellow Russia White ditto Soap ditto I Curd b> Melting Stuff .... RAW HIDES. Brat Heifers and Steers (per I Ordinary .. 2s 6d to 2i SI stone) Middlings... 2s - ed_2l2l_ckt COAL 'AI AR K ET, NOV. 29. Ships at Market. Ships Sold. rtic 100 i c New a s t le 66‘ 153 a od to e . 641 Sunderland 27,i 331 3d to 4 09 3d 28 1 Scotch Coal 0 —s Od to —s Od 1 Cannel Coal 0 —I Od to —II Od HIGH-WATER et LONDON-BRIDGE TO.MORROW. Morning • • . 41 minutes after 9 Afternoon • 10 minutes after 10 Loomot Panted and PoMaked by J F. KIALY, at the Sum O►rtc[i, No.l, Pickilt-Pfisc.c, Ten ploklan ,i-L. A ......... •••••.11 Is • 4ti Sql del te' Ci he thi abl se; tie as Its tic ex 01 • de 241 a l to 0 ea di •1i to Is Pm Pk lan as Ti lam PU ior or Vti ON _.,,_