Star. — London, England, 1802-02-27 00:00:00

LAW LVTELLICiENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FEB. 26. WILLIAMSON V. ALLANECIN. ?Ir. Cools thud that this bftion was bronrht by the plaintiff, the chief mate of the Earl Spencer Eaft Indiaman, to recover damages of the de• . fcndant, a wine merchant, for having fold him 24 dozen of claret, %%Melt was not of a quality fit for the Eaft India market. Tice plaintiff's claim was not merely for the value of the wine, but for the further amount of the profit lie would have gained had it been a marketable article. The claret was purchafed of the defendant, put on board the Earl Spencer, and flowed in filch a manner in the hold that no pollible damage could reach it. Upon the fhip'sarrivisl at Bengal, it was difeovered that feveral bottles were broke, the whole of the corks decayed, and what wine remained eistirely fpoilt, and fo four it could not be di asok—ie Was fold for eight rupees a dozen, about i 01. (terling. The witneffes proved that the claret in queflion was properly flowed in the hold, with a quantity of other wines, which were in perfea order when they were unpacked. Mr. ERSKINE contended, for the Defendant, that the wine was of diffident ftrength for a foreign market, of a good quality, and that its deteriora tion was the conlequcnce of its has fug been flowed in an improper manner. The Defendant's witneffes proved that the wine was bought by the Defendant of Meffrs. Allen and Smith, merchants, who had fold a cor.fiderable quantity of claret, oldie fame quality, to different.perfons, without e ver h a vi ng h ear d o f any com plaint on the part of the perfons who had purchad ed it. The Learned Judge laid the Jury were to decide whether the wine when it was fir It put on board was fit to he fold, or whether its fi:urnefs proceeded from mifmanagement while it was on hoard ? The Jury found a Verdi& for the Plaintiff for Ica the value of the wine, and the probable pro fit the Plaintiff would have nude. CROWDER V. RORI , RTS. 1 The ATTORNEY-GENERAL flat.d, that this WaS an aaion in which the Jury would have to affefs the damages which the plaintiff had fuftained by rcafon of the milconduCt of a coachman, who was entrufted by the defendant with the management of one of his coaches, which ran from Fetter-lane to Yarmouth. The proprietors of publio coaches were refponfible for the condut of thole who were by them enttufted with the care and ma nagement of their coaches, and if it were not fo, nobody would choofe to travel in them ; the maf ters of coaches were fuppofed to fele& their coach alien with care, and it was a well undertlood thing, . that the millers were refponiible for the ans of their fervants employed upon their bnfinefs, and ace ,, untabic to every paffenger for either lids or ci;omage to his property, or injury to his limbs, by the midmanaoement of any fuch fereants. In the p; dent cafe t'he pLintiff had indeed Inflained ir• reparable irjotr, loom the grofs mil:condo& of the defendant's coadonan. This action imputed no immorality to the defendant—hr hat been,cer tainly indifcreet in then feleaion of this coachman, vho was charged se Mc the c;ire of the property, and oven lives of thole of his Wear's fufsjeas, who had occafion to travel by the defendant's coach, for this cod.chmait was the moll drank: , brutal fellow, thak ewer drove a carriage. ..: 1 " 'lel low, by his drun'ennefs, or inhuman neglCr ,cake of the lives of t',:cle he had the care of, 1:- 4 '•.: m cca lied the nsif.ellief complained of in of and there Wi' uld he no queltion to-day os aetion, oefore the Jury... het'.ier the injury was occur- wised by the grofs lar',., o f this drunkard ? for it was admitted by the ei efendant, Mr. Roberts, t' oat the plaintiff. took ri place in the defendant' s coach to Yar niclu'. is—that the accident conr .ilained of,happened to ',he plaintiff on the jousr .ey. by di iving of the r oach, and that it was tier .coned by the drunken-, nets. careletiliel;, fault, or negligence of the de fendant's coacliman,,- who was then driving the coach, &c. The clue .tion then for the Jury would be, what damages they fhould give to Mr. Crow. der, who was wo oily ;In . :third from purfuing his proleffion, or to live in the line he had been sired to ? The plan stiff was a partner in a silver plating houle at Shei .t i e to, tender the firm of " Young, Walker, ar .1 Crowder," and his branch was that of the out .bufinefs, that of riding cut and travel- Log for' ;refers, &c. Ile took his place fall dim- Ines ill/London to go by the defendant's coach to Yarnitth, and the coach had proceeded beyond Che-r ssford on the load to Yarmouth, when the co; :f :anion, driving_ with that brutal fury which was o r often witneffed on the road, and which arofe b,. their tippling and loitering their time, and 'ioiiig engaged to arrive at a given place at a given / time, this was the way they had of making up for it. By this he overturned the carriage, on the outfide of which thin unfortunate Gentleman, the rlaiutiff, was riding ; he was thrown tinder the coach, and there he was left until affillance could be had fi om a diflatice off, when lie was taken up, carried to Boreliam, whine two furgeons attended him; he was kept there for three weeks, and after wards brought to town, where he was attended by Mr. Afbley Cooper, Surgeon of Guy's Hofpital, as well as by Mr. Ifaac Oliphant, and other fur gcons, fleilful in their profeffion. They tried all their (kill upon the cafe of this urfortunate Gen dollar., but they found it baffled their power to , reftore him to the flute he was formerly in ; and v they would now prove that he would be a cripple for life. His circumltances in life were refpeaable ; 1 he was a partner in the houfe he had mentioned, and he had by the partnerfhip deed t ool. a year for his diligence and aaivity ; but there was a pro!'ifion in that deed, that if any partner Mould be airsick:el from attending for fix months, ha null no longer be allowed that fum ! and he could not cape& that he fhould continue in the profit of the [Mind's now that he was totally difabled from taking any (hare in it. In fall, the Attorney-Ge nerallaid, the queflion for the Jury to confider was that which had been fubmitted to Gentlemen • in their fituation before, What a man, what either of themfclves would expea, when wholly difabled from purfuing his bands, to have allowed to him from a man, who had not indeed perfonally ' wronged him; but who was as anfwerable in law, and ia jtJlice alfo, for the confequences of the ac cident, and was as much bound to repair the in jury, as ii l e hid entered into a fpecific written coi' at to that effeect ? And the Jury would re member, that the quellion here did not embrace any id:a of moral guilt ; nobody imputed any to the iltf.:ndant : the whole was a queflion of civil injury, which the defendant was bound to repair. It was a quellion of what the equivalent was in the opinion of the Jury for the lofs which the plaitiff had fullained by lofing the right ufe of his limbs, and by lofing alfo his partnerthip in trade ? for certainly he could not continue in it, finee the notation he filled in it was that of the moil active Lind. He was aware that his Learned l'i:ead would a.ldrefs the Jury on the propriety of mode -1 ation in thefe pecuniary damages. He did not with to inflame them, but he could not help de tit ing the Jury to consider the cafe ferionfly, even in that point of view : they would confider the pain the pLtintiff had undergone, the expcnces he I had been Oiliged to defray, in his medical offal ance ; the lois of his trade, and the lofs of the ufe of his limb ; and the diminution of comfort which all thefe confiderations mull produce upon his mind, and the refit:Mon which mil fl accompany the recolleCtion of the melancholy accident, for the reft of his life. The furgeons who attended the plain tiff, would dcfcribe to the Jury the pain he felt, and alfo, that he was, to a certainty, a cripple for life. He was lorry for the fituation of the defendant, but, in this cafe, he was to be confidend as an in firer for the Etf:ty of the perfons as well as the pro. perry of the paffengers who went in his coach. In this view, this caute was important to the public, for, he trufled, that the verditt, in this cafe, would induce the mailers and proprietors of coaches to feled their coachmen and hreants with care, In that we Ihould ant in future have to complain fo much as formerly them, had been too much reafon to do, of broken limbs, and fometimes of the lofs of life. 'lle Jury would take the whole cafe into their confideration, and confider the Defendant civilly refponfible, for fo he was, up to the full extent of whatever might be ellimated as the Plaintiff's lots, in Which was to be included his future profpeCts, for the whole of which he was entitled to reparation. The admiflions were thcat put in and read— " That • the Plaintiff took a place in the Defen dant's coach from Lonctnn to Yarmouth. That the accident happened to the Plaintiff on the journey, and was occa t ioncd by the drunkennefs, carcleffnels, or negi gence, of the Defendant's coachman, win) wiv e then the driver of the laid Vlach." Mr. C reatnci-, •and Mr. Bird, two Surgeons of Chelmsford, g ve an account of the (late is which they found the Plaintiff, when they came to give him profeflirmal atliftance. They defcribed the thigh bone to be diLlocated : that the locket of OIL' ball j'a the jt.int was to injured that it could never b' reamed to it fo'mer Rate, and that nit& be inevitably lame for life ; that tte tir .ay, indeed, improve a little in time, and TT' be able to ride gently ; or, by the help of a . to walk a little, but that he muff be lame t life. Mr. Pu. n, Mr. Oliphant, and Mr. Afhley Coo. 'per, the latter Gentleman had Peen the Plaintiff this morning, all agreed that the Plaintiff mull be lame for Ide. Mr. Young., fon of one of the partners in the firm of which the Plaintiff had a !hare, gave an account of the firm, as defcribed by Mr. Attorney General. Mr. ERSKINE, on the part of the defendant, fpokc at confiderable length : he laid, many ac tions of this nature had been brought ; but he never witneffed one which refenibled this: in molt cafes a great deal of time was loft in examining into circuniflarces ; and much perjury was fre quently obliged to be witneifed ; while the de fendants merited no mercy, but rather deferved to be call in damages even more than would corn penfate the plaintiff. He laid there were a number of circumftances peculiarly favourable to the De fendant in this instance ; he had been a coach. owner for thirty-one years, during which period, as lie had been particularly scrupulous as to the carefulnefs and fobriety of his ferrants, no one accident had happened to any of his paffen gers. But the Gentlemen of the Jury mu ft knoW, that people were liable to be deceived by fervants in whom they trufled. Had the defendant re ceived a complaint ofhis fervant's mifconduft and drunkennefs, and yet fuffered him to remain with him, he would have deferved vindietive damages; hut he never knew that he was not perfeelyatten tive and fober. Mr. Erfkine here blamed the plaintiff, who muft have ken the Rate in which the coachman was, for not getting down and hiring a poll chaise, the expence of which the defendant would cheerfully have paid, and, in deed, regretted on the plaintiff's account that he had not done fo. In another inflance, too, the prefent defendant differed from others: immedi ately after the accident, Mr. Roberts indieted his fervant at the County Affixes, where he was con viCted, and fentenced to twelve months imprifon ment, which he is now undergoing, for his offence. There was but one other thing wanting to place Mr. Roberts's conduft in the molt favourable point of view ; and that was, he had advifed him to Infer judgment to go by default. This he had done, and had proved himfelf willing to make all the atonement which it was poflible for an unfor tunate man to make for the crime of another.— He could riot, as in a cafe of debt, pay a certain fum into Court, and plead it in mitigation of da mages : but he had done all that he could ; he had offered to refer the Winds to the arbitration of private men, but it had not been accepted. He certainly did not blame the plaintiff for appealing to the decifion of a Jury, and it was now left for them to determine what, under the general circum fiances of the cafe, for there were none but ge neral circumftances, the plaintiff was entitled to as a compenfation. If the plaintiff had been ac tually turned adrift on the world, as reprefented by the Attorney. General, the defendant would have been liable to (ulna hint with fubfillence, w but this was not the cafe ; and the Jury had only to confider the fubjeet in a general point of view. Mr. Juftice LAWRENCE fummod up the evidence given on behalf of the Plaintiff, kw there was none offered for the Defndant, and faationcti the rule of 1 law laid down by Mr. Attorney General, that the mailers of coaches were infurers of the fafety, not only of the goods, but alfo of the perfons of thore who travelled in their coaches, an-1 if, by any acci dent in the courfe of their carriage, by fault in the coach, or lvales, or coachman, any accident hap pened to the property or perfon of any one oar: iLti in their coaches, they mar. repair whatever da mage was done to either, to its mita amount, &C. The Jury returned a verdict of one hantlredgui neai for the PlaintifF. nis, Mr. ERSKINE obferS•ed, was the exae. futn which had been offered by the Defendant. COURT OF COMMON PI.EAS, FED. 26. FRFSTON AND This was au .::lion for upon a Pol:ey of Infurance of tiled upon a cargo of lead on board the Albion, Hay mailer, flora I - lewcaftle to London, at twenty-five , guineas per T!:e velfel and cargo w:re The queftion for the Jury to cktertrjrt Whether the Plaintiffs, at the time of making di,: infurance, difelaed all the eircumflance.they knew relative to the velfel, to the Underwrittas It appeared that by the Poll Office Lift of the 9th of November, which was produced in evidence, it was- Rated that a boat, having a elicit of lea man's clothes on board, was picked up at fea by the•llunter Revenue Cutter, and was found to have no (hip's name on it, but there was the tun= of Hay. The infurance was dialed by the Plaintiffs on the t zth of November, and it was found the nest day that the velfel was certainly loft. It was contended on the part of the Plaintiffs, that as the PoR Office Litt was taken in at Lloyd's Coffee-houfe, the Defendant, who frequented that houfe, mull be fuppofed to know the eirctunflance Rated in the lilt as well as the Plaintiffs, and that front his exacting fo high a premium it mull be prefumed he did know - it. It was endeavoured to be caahlifhed on the part of the Defendant, that the Plaintiffs did not communicate to him, at the time the infiirance was made, all the circumaances they knew relative to the veffel, and it was contended, that fo high a premium was only demanded in confetluenee of a violent Rorm which had happened a few daysbeforc. The jury, however, found a vcrdia for the Plain tiffs, - damages 731. t 3s. which, with the premium of twenty-five guineas, which the Defendant had repaid to the Plaintiffs, made up the film of tool. COOL V. BENNETT. The following cafe is the finis of the kind that has occurred, and the law upon the fads arc after to be decided by the Court. It was an adion brought by the Phi;;tiff, a ma- ' riner, againtt the Detendant, as owner of• the Kingflon, engaged in the Southern Whale try, arid having letters of marque and repricni.— Tire Plaintiff's contrail was founded upon written articles, by which it was agreed, that in lien of wages le, in common with the other sailers, was to have a certain proportion of the produce of the Merv, and a certain (hare of the prizes made dar ing the voyage. The Kingiton tailed from this country about three years ago, and proceeded to the coaft of South America, where the fell in witlr,, and captured a Spanish Ship, which was i-in ai prize to one of the Gallipagos Wands, an,'. f o ld for about 30001. The Kingiton corainite , ; on her voyage, and had performed pat - 1 of cl i c objed of it, when provinons running fhort, i. eras f oun d cc . ceffary to land the prifinteri. I:6th this view tilt Captain (leered to a SP:11,0i! 4:, ett l ernent , an d fen: boat ashore tinder a flag truce. The Plaintiff and fevcral other mar s were ordered upon that fervice; and havinn landed the prifoners, Were themfelves detaine e t arid impriained. The Plain tiff continued a in ;corer for above :t year; and in the mean tim; the Kingtlon completed her voy. age, obt.;;;ll . ,eil I,:r fun ca; go, made feveral other fmal.l prizes, and arrived lafe in Europe. The Plaintiff procured his rel?afe, and returned to England. Ile brought his adion to recover a ninety-fifth Share of the produce.of the fishery and the prizes during the whole voyage. For the Defendant it was contended he was only entitled to a Share for the time be was adu ally on board. Lord ALVANLEY ohferved, that this was a new cafe, as it refpedted the merchant fervice. ' With regard to the naval fervice it was clear, if a tailor was fent ashore upon. any duty, and was captured, he was not entitled to a Share of future prize mo ney. In this cafe there was an exprefs ftipulatica, that the Plaintiff thould have a glare of the pro fits of the fishery and prizes eluting the whole voyage. The queaion of law would be, Whether a failor, who was to IL:ft alhare of the profits of a voy ago, was entitled to them noiwithaanding, in the courfe of it, he Should have been made prilb ner ? The only cafe in the leaß Similar to the prefent one, was that of Chandler v. Greavcs, which was an action by a failor belonging to a merchant Ship, who was prevented from perform ' ing the voyage by an accident he met with in the execution of his duty. The Court held he' was en titled to his wages for the whole voyage. There was a cacumflance appeared in the courfe of the trial ; but as the Jury declined attending to it, we have not incorporated it into the report.-- . - In the articles, which had remained in the custo dy of the Defendant from the time.they, wcre.fign• ed, there were interlined the words, " fir long as each failor remained on board." There words were evidently not written at the time the articles were figned—at lean the ink appeared of 'a different colour. Lord ALVANLEY, after making Tome obfava dons upon this part of the cafe,.wifhed the Jury to decide as to the fad, but the Foreman. laid, they had no evidence upon which they could form a judgment. They therefore returned their verdift generally in favour of the Plaintiff, fubjed to the opinion of the Court, whether the Plaintiff, hiving been captured in the courfe of the voyage, was en titled to be a tharcr of the produce of the filhery and prizes 3 state Letter) , Ofticc, ,No. T 6, Corn 1:111.—m-. NicuoLsos tcfrafuliy acquaints rtiel.ds an-2 the Public, that the LOTTE;n• dt.iw ing on Z,F.amiay neNt, the b e Pickets, in the fTrcatc:l vatiezy of ;1;2 fold LF.vid:d into • and 5i7...t...nth Shares, thily tnt t o A,:i Pai 11.imew. :.t ,arge and i‘n the loon as dr:LV:n. Frdh ilTr l :cs rh. - afir.t, Li: :tn.?. c2i.:2- IYtoPs, (by th.! Patent) vr. re ceiv,dfl•ocn the Difi . ..!:,fary, S: - 1:o-Ct i • .7, in of ss. 2S. c:t.,l), by N; : ner rf St. P.cal's ; may I::: haa, a m_w c.fizion, o: SP:Lc 81:R Y'S 11111J1 a(.11111',A *Lc . Scus vy, Gout, Itera;..2y, one hulldred Calt:s; r:;•atc,', 3S. 61. LC A'l) . .),V f.` =TS. cer.N-rxcIIA,!GE,I , I)!DAs' . :7I7.I3RI7.ITtY :6. A P„.tuat cc' PV.ICES 1-1.111.Y.t, in•m the 13th of Feb. _ to tl.c Loth tu inclufive. - T0..1122 3;8 GtekA.—Avcr,st 395. 91d. as. to - 3. lower that I..tt rotarta. SMI 7;. To the otfal—rorftunc of Blis. Beef 45 8.1 to Gs ad Vc.,l 7s fd Muttnn - &d to Gt 8d Pork - ss 43 to hi. •.4A Stock at Market this morning. Ficaft, ;cc, Shear 9co. NE WGATE %nil LEA DLNI IA: .: .. IYon.ary Per (tone of F.lll. 1w tha ciwcafe. Beef 4s od to p Vtal 4s ft, '. to is 5d Mur.-0 st od to Ss Pork Ss 4d to PRICE OF TALLOW IN LONDON. St. James . ; r...ari.cc 41 33 Town Tallow its 63 to 08 eLre mnrket as 31 Rid% ditto (ca.) (~6s od to os Whitechapcl rtzeket 4s 24.1 Ruisa ditto (tor) has to 64s (per itonc u 1 44•...) White Candicßufrr.,63. to 441 Nicltioe Stott 54 , tal to Os ' zs 83 3ss od t.. a. Average nice 4s 213 C.. - La•As - 195 od to os Cood ot Yelkm S" I'• 7:s. to cs.--Mottlod,S;. , .--(.l.rd, 84t. IF. 6.l—Moullt. 12, CO. PRIC:. Oi• ',l.s': AND ATRAW, F.:or:tare :6. Id. St. James's. o.Huy 3zoto 5 5 2IQO CU 8 oI 4 0 0 1.0 5 5 0 N. do. o cto o Straw Ize tl' I I 7oto 1 19 OIII2C to I 13 0 L.) Ctuvet 5 0 G 6 . # s to oto 6 1: 2 Cf ILS, F hr ry in the. l'oui; :1. cg. od. per Cloldruu. 1)r!il•!rcd :1. 9s. ed. it. i - s. f?-•l'rrrrd cl. ós. o.i. ), !"37 The Rc7cren... Dr. 1•"...:_!; • r indede.l to the R.:....t0ry ef vd o l by :he refq.e...ti.)ri of the Rev. 1)r I Tw-cii;:g. of Saiti.i . !, a ••ro'!:. 1 i'rlicod;o7 i t t!'.e Cathedral Church of ~ 11 tic r(.,:•, the v. re . ak. alLacoli aw n!,,, r (LH v2 "• .L4 y t l e d..ith of Dr. F.,unt.Jyr..., york. -- ----. Illit'FflS. At M' (1 DrJyton., 'Mrs. J. (1. rA. miro,, of a (1,:if: , ...rr. 1 A il. -. 1 ,-,. A, ut t`or's., th.:. L.:. f 5.,1 . 1..:(..w..r.a:::-C.L liva cot% of tLk Ruy.tl Arti!L .y. c:"... fj.,. Fattv . ..ay 7.,1.k141::1•:1). . l'il, at N:intt. r . John P,l,:ck, Eil.,,ith , : Pay Ogzt, in Sl.i . e - acr' • 1 :00 , . ', Art:. t., Nl:i-,.‘rn ..tr.e.: N1.id:.:.,:-;:.. duJght. r •./. V...!::am :t.:.,.1,1,:,,:1;5, Eig. &I:Art*4 ‘-ii.iul.a..t, of thi.t . ,,:::,., %•.,,..,. On ; inft. North End Chun+. Hants, Nir. loreyk Samt!':' Vl' m' . Ifl D. On th.. intl. the Rcv. lVilitain Jack fon, A. M. Vicar of 11u.11 Church, He kid ititait h. preceding cacinag k a party of friend:, 41,i re:irtit to tug appar.:l:: y health, but wa, iakeil II :iiniut fix o'clock in the ruomin;, and in a :t.m. r.tinute. tsiiircei. On Saturday 1::::, at H after two days ilincfs, of the learlet Ever, ilatt.r Jahn 'Suck Thompf4n, azett yoMsgelt fon of the late John Thornion, F.fq. of Chard:ant Dcantr), in Kent. 0:: th: lila. nr:eieda, in Ireland, at aver! a " , cneed Mr. Ni..helas Byrne, fininirly an eminent wint-rr.achant p-iitrect, Caver.dithifquarc. BI To Me. Thomas Tayha, Sur f !eon, No. 9, New Brit'ge Street, niaa Sit, Lc, elott. I T is will the Mort :ma t f:ttis.f.te r t:.on that I ad tits`, you on the inconipar..hle excellence of yt.u. invaluable MeOicine—Lna kr'. Pal nN I'lt.t.s.--111 the fpring of this year I lied the. misfortune to cant _eta Vene:cal Csmiplaim a attended with the molt alarming and dangerous fyrr.ptores ; aftnuch,that I have beeueonlined to my room for a whole week together, and not able to Ilk out of it ; I had no tea night nor day, and futrered the moil exertciating •atin and ternicit, end what was ttdl wurfe, my Eyes weak mid dim, fo that I could fearer difeern any object, if ever ft dole to me, and ex peeled nothing Hs than the total lois ofory llght.-•-Frorn a Rout, healthy, and rather corpulent man, I bect.nte a mere thadow, and au object of pity and emlitan:on.--My friends had :di given me.orer, and thought my recut , . ry iutpod.ble. In this dre....1m1 Rate, and expeetiog ever, minute to be one lift in this wonti, I was Invtinattly v.icommt,tided by a neiglthour to 1-y your Medicines, hot having tried all met:le:el aid to Ito warpoft, and been at an encrmout expence, it was force time hefore I c0.n.1 he prevailed on to take them; at laic i fent for fix boars, cad before I had taken them all, I found confider-al:1e ; Illy ,ins gradually deercafed, and my eye-tight grew hetter,• and to the great furprize and altonilliment of all my friends, !,aftertak ng three boxes ninte), my hell: and itrength was perfectly : amed, and I ant now, (thanks to my Goo and your invalnable Mcdteints), ae well and hearty as ever I was in rnv life. Your obli:-,ert humble fervant, R. L. LE:GI I. Iligh-Erect, Birmingham, Nt.v.m.ber t, r 199. You are at full liberty to publish this in any manner you think proper, for the benefit of foc4ty at large, and winch I theutd have fent you fooner,but was fearful of a relaple. 'l'lw aboveMudicine is earneftly re,eonunended to all perfons that are in any doubt of their being entirely tree of every We nerealiffeetion, particularly to thole about altering their con dition in life, as it will certainly eradicate every mita of that nature, of however long ltanding, or however &lit...lied urde: the appearance of other diforders it may be ; fu. See - henac, Glandular, and Cutaneous Cannplaints, it is alto recnninicadel to be taken, efpecially in the Spring, Summer, and Fall.. - Prepared and fold by the foie Proprietor, THOMAS 'I'AY LOR, Member of the Corporation of Surgeons, lanidon, his houfe, No. 9, New 13ridgedtrect where he - will give A.l - without a Fee, to perfons talthir tilde Pills, anti will co fwer pati:nts Letters, if p. tt t aid, on the fume ter:ns, °breve- Mg in all cafe,' the molt inviolable Secrecy:no Perrin's nanti,cf cafe having been mentioned, but at their own particular requt A by the Proprietor, during the rourte of more than 35 yea:, fist be has had the conduit of an extenfive fale of the above flied:- cine,and the pradice ailing threefrom. They are alio fold by his appointment, at the Perfumer's, No. 35, St. Alban's-Itreet, Pall-Mall; Mr. Robertion's Tof- Ihnp, No. 103, Oxford Brea ; VIIr. Steel's, Bookleller, No Union-row, Little Tower-Hill; and by one ronfiderable town in England, in Boxes of fealed up with full and plain Diredions. LONDON: Printed for the Proprietors, by "(of Carnaby-street) at the 8 rasa PIUNTI! Carey-itrect ; and publithed by LEVEL tabnry-place, Lambeth), at No x, Carey-. ST A I-0 V VC!, Temple-Bar; to which Witco thins for the gnaot are ratiutited to be a' Bookielier, Nu t. mr Verfon in ev..; y )f on:) , 2i. 9d. Cad', JOI - IN ING-OFFIC, N., I, • KENT, (.1 CAR- y-ftreet, ail Iffice all COMI1:11:4 addrcfra