Star. — London, England, 1802-08-10 00:00:00

P iL(CE, :. rr t.tc Or ri rT.—Yr erl37, tWO 1706141,:.;:t 7 ; to the B;:enad. Regiment of Guards, were er !mined Lloa: A. Craatiam, on a charge of footpad toiiiicry. Thomas War ner, of Ea.t Acinn, ilat,d. that on Sat n' day night la 4, abont t.n o'cloe!;, a. h.: was going home over Shepherd's Built o.nimon, aid while walking on the foot path, th.! two prifoneis came ont lia•m a ate, ache was pa{Th by, and o f them Iriz ,n, him by the collar, laid, d—n your eyes, have pm got any 'Aver ? that the oth':r ptifoner ahn laid hold of him and made oft of fimilar e=pref linos ; that they took fionl hint a leather purfe, containing mil feven Ibijing pi 2ces and doer (ha. I;ngs ; and on In, a!king them for the purfe again, fwore at him, and hid him he off; and ran away thenifelvc:s towards Lonckn. The profecutor then went to the Vs'hite !ale p•thl:c honk, near the fdot, where he nict the officers, to whom he gave notice of the robbery. Two of the Bow-fireet pa tulle laid, that on being li:formic! of the above tranfaftion, by the proleentor, they immediately went in purfoit of the robbers ; and, with the af (Mance of a Mr. Awlier, of Notting hill, who took one of them into his chaife, the prifoners were overtaken and ((cured near Bayfwater ; and a lea ther pule found on the perfon of one of them.— Mr. A itlier gave his evidence 3% to the apprchen fion ofllte priftmers ; and the profeLutor, Warner, identified the pink, as being the fame he was robbed of. The prifoners were therefore fully committed. Yeflerday evening the Coroner's Inqueß was held at Mr. Underwood's, the Mortimer's Arms, Tottenham Court Road, on the body of William Mawley, who was unfortunately dr owned on Sun. day evening la ft, in a fmall pond ofabnut filty yards in circumference in Nfortimer's•felds, the end of Gower-lireet. The circumilances were nearly as follow:—on Sunday evening, about fix o'clock, there was a number of boys bathing in the laid pine!, which they could wade acrofs, excepting a (mall (pace of about two or three yards in the nsidelle ' and which is about eight or nine feet deep. This Mawley came and undreffed himfelf, at which time he appeared very much intoxicated; he went in along with the boys, making this ex preffion,that he would fwim acrofs, or the b—dy water fhould drown him ; he fwatn acrofs once, but in the fecond attempt he went to the bottom. A boy who was in the water tan to take him out, hut he proved too weak, and then a man who Rood by followed and brought him out. He did net remain ten minutes under water. When he was taken lip, there were fymptoms of life. He was carried to the Mortimer's Arms, being the next 'Five bottle, and immediate affillance procured. 'Five or fax of the Faculty attended, and made every effort on the occasion without fuccefs. The deceafed was very much in liquor. He was a bricklayer by trade, only twenty-one years of age, and was to be married next week. His father and filler keep a clothes fhop in Fitzroy-market.— The Jury brought in a verdia—Accidtntal Death. Yefterday evening the Coroner's Jury fat on the body of Patrick Flynn, at the Swan, in Arundle fireet, Strand, who was drowned on Sunday even ing off the Temple Stairs. The circumftances at tending it were as follow ; Flynn, who had lately returned from Tea, in company with another man oldie name of Crawley, (not his brother, as dated in yederday's Paper) hired a wherry for the day's amtilement. When they came off the Temple Stairs, they were oblerved by a Gentleman and his wife, who were coming along in a wherry, to be very drunk ; there was none in the boat but the two men ; however, the Gentleman heard a fplara ing in the water, but could not tell who firli fell in, having loft fight of them by turning his head ; he however towed up with all the halle he poffibly could, and put his oar under one-of their breafis, and fupported him until two boys came to his af- I . :Ranee, and then they pulled him into the boat, feuniingly liftlels, as he was obliged to be carried hums: the Gentleman Rating that there was ano ther, Mr. Robinfon came out from the Temple gate, and brought a grappling-iron, with which he fticeeeded in recovering the body, after it had ben about three quarters of an hour under water. IThinn's brother intended being of the party, but was prevented by funiething interfering. After th.: Jury had brcught in their verdia—Acciden tal Death, the body seas taken away to the haute oldie deczafed's father, Ilank-Cde. _ On Saturday about:one o'clock, the following Mocking accident happened at ;lath :—A Mts. Evans, an ;tied widow lady, fitter to the Rev. Dr. SHE rrARD. at or near Andover, Hants, flop ring at a hntife in Well-gate buildings, and leafed an a wheel chair, while the ferrant went to the 4 IAor, either to knock or deliver a mdfage by her di: eery n, the chair, which had been Itationary , •vliLn the krv.int left it, by fome means or other tan back, and, upfetting off the pavement, this un fortunate lady wa , Rtecipitated into the road way ; an empty coil waggnit paging at this critical jwel ,tire, one of the fore wheels went over her herd in An initant, and her almoll immediate death followed, in the prefatce of many perlOns who wt.re paling at the time. It appears that no blame whatever can be at-. taclied to ally party, in this lament:rid:: affair ; the driver wAs chili by the fide of the waggon, and the civet:net:lnce of the chair running back eras purely :occidental. Ft iday nignt, al.mit eleven o'clock, a gentleman returniro: home thr , al: ! ll Moor.tields, was knocked down by two fellows armed with bludgeons, who rfi t,h,d bins of about 41. in cath, with whidi they made their efcape, leaving the gentleman fenfelefs en the gro , :nd. At an carry hour on F; i.lav eveninfy, a fellow rot over the garden wall of a Mr. Smeille, in ball Place, I. , mitetli, and Ilrle font: cloaths which Lung gaiden ; he was otterved by a wo man ;o 11^...5-, wit" ran out, and endeavoured t o r e run : I,;:ri as he was making his efcape ; he, however, kii:xr.sd her dos. n, as well as a man who came U. r ;he then climbed o:er ;he wall, and :he alarm being ralia4 bu was I:Ur i...wed a id t.tken. ASSIZES. MAIDSTONE, FRIDAY, AL`DUST 6. Mary Rowed" was indieled for the wilful mur der of her female child, at a place called Gilling ham, in the minty of .Kent. The ptifoner was lervant to a Mr- Grinflead, and was obferved to 1-: exceedingly ill, thntigh none cf the family int: pest Ni her to he with child. On the 24th of June the was mach WOT rf ; in th• eveniil , 4 of which day the fecreted herfell in the privy belonging to the hour:, and was delivered of el female infant. She w• ; alked, a thou time afterwards, if the was bet. to ? flue flid the was, and begged to go to bed.— The nest mottling a child was difcovered down the privy, and the prifoner accuted of brutally defiro)ing her babe; the replied, the knew the had a,fled wrung in keeping her pregnancy a fecret, but that the thought the had two months to go, and meant, when her miarefs got up (Mrs. Grinilead lay in at the time), to alk leave to go home to her mother. Stae added, that the child was dead born, and that the wifhed to conceal her fhame. A wit nefs, who seas in the adjoining houfe, (wore port tively that flue heard the cry ofa child, and Ihortly i after'heard ltunething thrown down the privy.— This, it was argued, might have been the cry of! Mrs. Gtintlead's titian:, and not the prifoner's, which, indeed, appeared to he the fad, as Mr. Andrews, the furgLon, who viewed the child after it was taken up, faid, that he could not take upon hinifelf to fay the child , a;a - ,• live born. There was another fan, very much in favour of the prifoner, namely, that the had made provi fion of cloaths for her expeCled infant. She had a good charaCter as to her affeCtion for children in general, and to her having lived in her place five years. She had always been looked upon as a good girl, and it was fuppofed that fhame had in duced her to conceal her misfortune, rather than premeditated guilt. The Judge fumnued up with much feeling, and the Jury pronounced her—iskt Guilty. Chapman, lames Smith, and li'm. were indiered for felonioufly killing and flaying George skinner, in the city of Canterbury, on the 7th day of May lall ; it appeared the deceafed was fighting with one of the prifoners, when he received a blow *hich drove him under a carriage, on which the other two prifoners were fitting, the wheel of which went over his head, and killed him on the fpot. The prifoners were found—Guilty of Manflaugh. ter, and were fentenced to one month's imprtion merit. They have lain in gaol from the time of the accident. The Allizes having &Ted on Saturday evening, the eighteen following prifoners received fentence of death : Frzncis Allen and William Clark, for healing a black hot(' and I , ay mare, the property of Stephen Page. Wiiham Mace and John Lawrence, for healing a brown mare, the property of John Marlow. Iliac Good, for healing a bay mare. John Jones and Daniel Anchor, for uttering at Canterbury forged flank notes, knowing them to be fuch. eiljarnin Blackford and Jofrph Powell, for lbeep-healing, in company wit► it. rations, who has already been executed for the offence. David Wakefield, for ftcalirg from a velfel lying at Rochef tei , !hive bales of lisp clothing. the property of John Ledwiek. ina Cowie, for a highway robbery from Oliver Clarke. Charles Allcoond,for forging a feamais's will and power. William Dorton and Henry Robertfon, for a burglary In the dwelling-houfe of Edward Overight, in Cliffe. John - Butchcr and Samuel Afhdown, for fevcral highway robheriek. • Jana.:&at, for horfe-ftealing. And William Freeman, alto for liorfe-Itealing. John Jones and Daniel Anchor, for uttering forgcd Bank Notes, and Charles Almond, for forging a will and power, were feparately fenteneed, and informed they were not to ta ped any mercy, from the enormity of their crimes; and are the only three left for execution. _ . To he tranfported for 14 years:—Matthew rower, for ut tering forged Bank notes, to which charge he plcaded guiity ; illiant Stoat:lt:ea and Urias Allander, for receiving Itolen gaols; thirty-two for (even years each; and niu. for various periods nf imps ifonment. The remainder were difeharged by proclamation. YORK ASSIZES—NISI PRIUS. SIR THOMAS PILKING row AND OTHERS, V. GILL A%D OTHERS. The plaintiff is owner of certain ancient corn mills in the town of Wakefield, to which the privi lege offuit and foie is annexed: The defendant and other perfons had meed modern mills within the foke or manor of Wakefield, and the gneflion to be tried was, whether the eredion of fuch mills, for the purpofe of grinding corn, was or was not an in van at of the plaintiff's rights, a; proprietor of the ancient foie mill ? Serjeant Coc II lux (fated the cafe of the plaintiff, and admitted, that the queflion lay within a very 'tallow compafs. It was fimpry this: Whether any corn could legally be ground in the townthip of Wakefield, except at the plaintiff's mills, to long as the plaintiff's mills were in a fituation to grind it) The Learned Serjeant then tinted the title of the plaintiff as deduced through the Saville family, to whom James I. had made the original grant of thefe mills: he alfo (fated two decrees of the l)uchy Conn of Lancatler, confirming tilde rights ; the one dated fo early as the year 1610, the other in 1761. He alfo dwelt on the reafon ablenels of this privilege of foie, as ;airing from the duty incumbent on the lord of the manor, of keep ing up his mills in proper repair and condition. The evidence on the part of the plaintiff was, the original grant of thefe mills by James!. afterwards confirmed by Oliver Cromwell.; the tun decrees, the one dated 16 to, the other 1761, confirming the right offole ; and the parole tellimonies of feveral old witneffes fpcaking to the cutioms. Mr. Woon, on the part of the defendants, •b -raved that the evidence which had been adduced by no means affeded the defence he was inftruded to make : He was ready to admit, to the utmofl extent that tltofe decrees went, that all cam, "eon fumed, fold, or uttered," at the devellinr-toofis of thole perfons living within the fde, ought to be ground at the plaintiff's mills ; but the defendant's mills had been erected fur the purpofe of grinding corn, not for the inhabitants of Wakefield, nor to be conftuned within the limits of the plaintiff's pri vil. ge, hut for the purpofe of being fent to Lulea (hire, and to other didant pmts. 'llk had been admitted by the plaintiff:; and the defendants con ceived themfelves perfedly jullifiable in iii doing. Lord ELLENEOROUGN faid, he had .never read in any legal reran, or heard of any claim of this fort In ertenfive al. what the plaintiff flied for.— ' This privilege of Coke was originally a mete ad vantage, to which the Lord of the Manor was en titled in reciprocity, for the expense of building and keeping in repair mills for the conveniznce ni his tenants ; but as for this claim, which was not only for a monopoly, - as refpeaing the internal conlitmption of Wakefield (which was allowed). but for the entire corn trade that might be cad. blilhed here : it was a claim fb very extraordinary and extent - we, that it required very aria proof of eflablifhed cuttom to lanetion-it (if any cuttom could be allowed to fanaion a claim fib hoflik to the interefts of the community). As to the decrees that had been read, they proved nothing more, than what had been admitted by tho. De fendant ; that the Plaintiff had an exchfive right to grind at his mills, the corn urea for the coafumption of the town of Wakefield ; but as to any exchtfive privilege of the plaintiff to pi es Lin perlims in Wakefield from grinding corn for the ufe of other dillrias, he could neither find it in the evidence, nor infer it by analogy, from the known rights of other fake mills. Verdia for defendants. THE KING V. SUTCLIFFE. This was an indictment for. a libel, publiffied by the defendant againft Mr. Beaumont, an aetinz Magittrate of the Weft Riding. Scrjeant COCK ELL Rated, that although the libel which was the fubjal of the prefcnt precaution' WAS as malignant and foul as die heart of man had ever invented, yet, as the Jury were only called upon to fay whether the defendant was guilty or ma of publilhing it. he Should not dwell on the falfehood and malignity of it,as thole circumftanc es which aggravated in the higheft manner the guilt of the defendant, were to be futonitted to the Court when they fhould be called upon to pronounce the rentence. The libel was conveyed in a very long and very abufive letter to Jofepli Radcliffe, Efq. who was alto an acing Magistrate of the fame dif tridt. It charged Mr. Beaumont, in the moll vio lent and rancorous terms, with having wilfully and deliberately given a falfe account of his property before the Commiffioners of the Income Tax.— Among the many defamatory expreflions refpeCt ing Mr. B. are the following : .4 I than now give a thort account of the infa mous conduit of your brother juftice, and of the wilful and deliberate falfehoods he has Rated before the Commiffioners. This is the /ov:/patri9t, who would do every thing to support the Government and the revenue, except giving a fair account of his own income, which is not lefs than 50001. per annum. When asked by the Commitlioners how it happened that his income was fo much Inf., than the preceding year, he gravely replied, that he had by millake charged himfelf too highly tiie year before ; but when fitting over a cheartul glut., he j2cofely laid, If the Commiffioneis knew the quantity of timber I have fold there three hit years, what would they think of the account I gave them?' Such conduCt and morality might be expeted in a man who, like him, boafts of feldom going to be fober, and of not being in the inftdc of a church once in feven years. I now appeal to you,whether inch a man be not a difgrace to your Bench, and whether he onzlit not to be (truck off the Commiflion ; and whether I have not dill charged my duty to the public in expofing the robber of the revenue to public jultice ?'' The letter was proved to be the baud-writing of the defendant by Mr. Radcliffe, who received it. The Counfel for the plaintiff then ttated, and it was admitted by the Counfcl fur the defendant, that as the publication of the libel was proved, the Jury were bound to find the defendant guilty, and could not go into the particular circumftances of this libel, which mutt be difelofed at a future time to the Court by affidavits. Lord ELLEN BoROLICII Paid, the Counfel for the defendant had aeled rightly, in not contending that the truth of thofe expreffions (even fuppofrng they were true) would be a defence againft this profecu tion. The peace of fociety is not wantonly to be dilturbed by perfons, who, from malicious mo tives, publifh what may even be true, for the pur ple of injuring the charader, and wounding the feelings of individuals. If thofe perfons have com mitted offences, instead of being libelled, they ought to be brought before the proper tribunals. In the prefent cafe, if the defendant's zlfertions had been true, and they had been conveyed in decent language to the Coml . /tin - inners of the Income Tax, the defendant would have been clear from any cri minality, as acing from public duty ; but, on the contrary, he had fen this letter (the language of which was very far from decent) to a gentleman who had nothing to do with the collation of Mr. B.'s income tax. If the defendant was found guil ty, the Court would Rill confider with attention every circumttance he could urge in mitigation of punithment. Verdiel—Gulty. LEAMAN AND OTNELP V. ARMITAGE. This cafe, which had been tried at our WI Af fines, was ordered by the Court of King's Bench fur a new trial, the cireumflances of it b ing fo peculiar as to require the molt deliberable consi deration. The plaintiffs are partners of a banking-bottle at Pontefraa, which had dikounted on the 17115 of May, 'Sot , for a total &anger, a bill of 3,71. figned by the defendants, Mefirs. Joseph and John Armi tage, as drawers, direaed to Meffrs. Fuller and Company, and ordering the money contained there in to be paid to the order of James Smith, which name the dranger cndorfed on the hill at the time of its being fo dircounted. The plaintiffs fent the laid bill to Med . 's. Fuller and Company for accep tance, who raided accepting it, having received particular dire6tions from ivlefrrs. Armitage to that effc& on the ground that the bill had been either 101 l or dolen from them before it had been filled up ; and that although the defendants names were tigned to that bill, yet that, as the body of the bill and tile endorfement on the back of it were forged, the hill itfelf was to be confidered a forgery. I'hc ' plaintiffs affel teol that they had taken this bill in the regular courfe of their bufinefs, without notice of thole circumflances, and fclely on the credit of the defendants lignatures as drawers ; and there fore they brought this atgion as againft the draw ers oldie bilk iq qvr liiou, whickt had been refuled acceptance. ,' Lord ELLENVIROVIII eortf3(iered it upon the plaintiffs to prove, that the p.:1; 1) cndorfed the name Jtmcs Si-aidi was Inc Smith mentioned in the bill as tliz ; ;,, much a: the bill was only payable to the the payee, and to 119 other pC111)11. its nr , was given of this, his Lordthip u:r;:azi the i;:c:t, tiff to be noufuitcd. LON DON AMP KLT CORN-EXCHANGE, MONI)AY,t,r:::T 9. A Retail:, or the PRICES of FLOII.t, tn.:a t !J: j u t, tJ:LC 3C-CA in . July .:1.:1;o-c Total 14040 farks.--Atcr:-;: t.' ta. 61..1. hi •her than I:fi t RETURN of WHEAT , ,n wit !not the Vith or July to the 30. ut Jt/y. Total-308a Q,E,rttrc Av , ..:AL: os. yid lai b her than lan rttcr.,. SLEDS. Red Clover - co, to I-;. p-• rw!, VP.:ite Clover 804 tu pkr co Trefoil to ((,51,cr cwt I\.;w Rape Fectl per !aft 331 to .;%;I. PR /CE OF IioPS. Kent 61 Ica to 81 es) „; Kent 71 r . to 9.1 :c, 1 `tai's 61 cs to 71 to% t 1 ,1 0 Suffer 71 es to 1 • ; ,- f ...1 Life: 61 os to 71 tos )Cl Faro. 71 os tots! ;.s . S smatin ELL", An 7 ....c: ~ ... To tin!: the offal—per 1101 ot of 8%, Beef - 4s OA to 53 od Vs.4l - .ss ;A is 1 ,, Ej Mutton -3s 04 to 31 64 Pork - ss eki t ,, ;, 4 Lamb ss od to ft, est Stock at Market that moni,ng, &ails 176; Sheep an.: !ambs 12, , .::;.:.. NEWGATE and LEADENHA 1 1., Augaft ?. Per Roue of SM. by the cars:ol. Beef 31. 6d to 41 64 Veal 35 40. to r 7 a Mutton 4$ 4d to pod Perk 3s c , l to 3, 44 Lamb 4s 8d to cs ild. PRICE OF HAY AND STRAW, A . .!,I'.:ft 7. Smithfield. Ft. James's. Wnltee.ia T A. o.Hay stoto7 10 14 TO oto 7 17 6I 6 o oto -10 • New 410tO6•I13 • tO 2 12 0 1 2 00to: 12 0 Straw 2 oto 2 S( ....._. 7 7 0 to g g 0 Clover 6 6to 8 o Do. new s o to 6 to COALS, Auguft 9. Deft Coals in the Peed, 21. 3s. cd per Chicken. Delivered 21. 125. od. Sunderland, tl. 19s. c.d. Delivered 21. 7s. od. • BIR,THS. - On the asth ult. at Nortnaudby Hall, Cleveland, Lady C'cis. lotto Baillie, of a daughter. On Wednefilay loft, at Creedy, near Exct.cr, the Lady of Sir John Davie, Bart. of a daughter. IARRICD. At Pitliver Houk, the ad init. Robert Clarke, younger cd Contric. Efq. to Mifs (Idea diuglAce of Robert Wellwood of Garvock, Efq. At Edinburgh, fame dity, Jam; Gilchrfa, Efq. writer to the fignet, to Mil; Jeflie Currie, daughter of IlukL Efq Culloch, writer to the fignet. Same 'lay, at Alantrore, John Cowie, rfq. late of Can rpm, In the Eaft Incas, to NUN Helen Rer.ny, ..i4oghttr of limr! Remy Efq. _ _ , , lohn Arrr.ftrong, of Scancy, county of Monaghan, Efq. Afifs Crzycn, of ilawfon-ttrcct, Dohlin, fifta to titc High Shisriff. Rev. Wm: Henry Pratt, Rector of Joneflaorough. to M:fa Mary Corry, :d daug!it,r of Ifaac Corky, Co. Efq of Novry. DIPD. Sunday tall, at Taft Bourue,.7liift Lomita Iludfon, youegelt daughter of Sir Chaeca Grave liudon, Bart. of Wauly I.eizefterthire. By a fall from his horn!, the Rea. James Clancy paha] pritt of Killogh. county Waif rford. Wotheiday, at Cane. Egi4, Otoa, Mrs. Aranderfteg=, wife of Vanderftevrt, Elq. Friday fe'nnigl.t, after a (arc inners, hlifa Szrh Coadchilti, daughterof Mr. Wm. Goocichild, of Hartley-rtml,„ Hants At Po!entaife, the :d trftant, Mrs. Anne CarrVJet.:. wifc of WiIL3M Murray, kfti. of Touchcdam, after L:in: dri!.... , :r;A: of a fon and daughter. At Wcitbarns, the 3d ion. Mr. AJa:n WELD, racralat is Dunbar. Lately, in the Eaft lcdies, lieutenant-Colonel Thorn Wharton, Commander of as sth regiment of native cavelry, cid& fon of 'thomas Wharton. I fq. Commiflioner of Facile. HIGH WATER AT LONDON tat EGI. TO...VOKROW D.Tornlng 12 tnnutes after it a Afternoon 43 min .as ate 12 VENERF.AI. BLINDNESS, To Mr. Thomas Taylor, Surgeon, No. 9, Ncw ➢ridge•bed DEAR SIR, Lordon. - IT is with the moll heartfelt fatisfaaion that ! drds you on the incomparable excellence of ynt.i invalasbla PAL ENT PI L 1.5.1111 the fining of this year I had the misfortune to contract a Venereal Comaliur. attended with the moll alar.ning and daugerous umtoias ; affnuch,that 1 have been confined to my room for a what: leak together, and not able to ftir out of it; I Lad no reL niabt vcx day, and fuffered the molt excruciating pain and tormeat, mai what was (till worfe, my Eyes grew weak and dim, ...c) that I could fcarcc dirt:ern any object, if ever fo dole to nie, and ex pected nothing lefs than the total lofsof my fiaatt.--I'rom a Ibiar a healthy, and rather corpulent man, I became a lia•re fkatlow. and an object of pity and cumpalTion.—My frier& h sd..llgivca sic over, and thought my recovery inionflible. la this (tats, and expecting every minute to be my Lit in tills world, I was fortunately recommended by a neighbour to try your Medicines, but having tried all medical aid to no purpo!, 3E4 been at an enormous expcnce, it was fume time before l caaki be prevailed on to take them; at Lilt 1 fent for fik an iii More I had taken them all, I found confidiralale benefit: tnat pains gradually dccreafed,and my eyerlialit arew hatter, 17:(1 to the great furprize and aftonithment of all my friend.. i are r tar ng three boxes more), my health and tarena h sea , 1/C1 ft ala Ir. flared, and 1 am now, (thanks to any Con and ;•o::r Medicines), as well and hearty as ever I was in my lire. Your obliged humble tenant, R. L. LE Birmaigbam, November a. anew You arc at full liberty to puldilk thiS in any inaanar e k proper, for the ber.cf.t of fociety at large, and wbieli I alaali have rent you footter,but was fearful of a relap:•:. aboveMediciae ia earneftly reecunrucnded to nll ocerraa that arc in any doubt of their being eat lady free of ever re nereal.lari•aion, particularly to tliufe aboat alterag t dition in life, as it will certainly eradicate every taint of t'ait nature, of h:,wever long Ilatidn,a, or hewever di - aultal Nedra' the appear:nee of other d;fordeia it may he; f..r Glandular, and Cutaneous Complaiata, it is an a c .rrotemiA to be tal.ea, efaecially in the Spring. Stannic). alai rail. Pre; arad and fold by the foie Proprietor, To;):.: A.-, TAY Lox, Isliantter of the Corperatian of Suraeona, a:. ; i t his haufe, No 9, New liridge•ftreet ; where lie will: lea• ,a l vice, without a ice, to perms takiag there Pia. , anal aaao fwer patients Letters, i pod paid, on the fame tiler., •ha ly . • log in ::II cafes the omit inviolable Secrecy, to* Perfon'.:i • %- cafe: having he,al menticned, hat at th , :r own narcienlir rap .-1 by the Prolirietni, during the courfe f more than 35 years. tha he ha. had the roaduat of an extenfivc fate of the above cine,,nd the pra Ace arifing therefrom. They arc alto fold by his appointment, at the Perfaalcr:r. No. as, at. Alban's-Matt. Pali-Mall; alr. Roberron's (hop, No. to:,, Oxford. area ; Mr. Steen, Boakkiler• Ids. t, Uni ai.row, Little Tower-Hill; rid by one Perron it: ctecl confider-lUc town it: Lnglaral, in &mei of only as. 9d. cat's haled up with full and plain Directions. ear, • inr Cie Fropoct....s, by jOi IN DAN° I • (of Carnat.y-ftratt) at theS TA N. ‘. Carry-arttt; ana inti.Ufbel by Lq.VKL (of L'aL• Lat4Z.: , :th),l• No. 1. C'ank•y-ftrect, and a: ,!!.: STAX•OI/CII, 7.Ar.14-liar; CTee all coln-m 6 a l ' trio for* Eat rot *.re nice-eked to :e ad4relcl. r ,I