Star. — London, England, 1819-03-22 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. Saturday the VIVI-CHANCELLOR intimated to the Bar, that the LORD CHANCELLOR felt himself so well as to give notice that he should on Tuesday morning, if possible, proceed with the hearing of motions. ROLLS' COURT, '!..111(31 20. IN THE MATTER OF BRADSHAWS CHILDREN. • I%lr. AGAR said, this was a case of some impor tance to the parties, the infants icing wards of Caurt. The father died possessed of considerable property, which be bequeathed to his children ; and they being minors be consigned them to the Court of Chancery, as wards of that Court, and appointed two trustees, whose management was, however, to be under the di rection of the Court ; the question now before the CAtirt was, whether a very great number of trees, which were fit for cutting down, should or should not be sold ; be.7ause if not sold, then they would be un questionably spoiled. I-Ic hoped the Court w ould ac cede to the motion, as it was of great advantage to the infants. The .Ni.,,TER of the ROLLS rn•.l_'•`:l this to be done, and agreed to have the trees sold without any farther reference to the Master, in order to save expenses. PALACE COUP.T, MARCH 19. LONG V. JODERMOT. This action was brought by Mr. Long, of Long's Howl, Bond-street, against Mr. R..Nl‘Dermot, livery stable keeper, in Grovenor.mews, for the recovery of 126/. 13s. 6d. being the amount of a promissory note for 401. and a bill of exchange for 801. Ss. 6d. with the interest. The defendant had become a bankrupt, and obtained his discharge in January last, under the Insolvent Debtors' Act, but was since arrested on this suit. He was held liable to the payment of Mr. Long's claims, because he gdve him no notice pre vious to his examination betore the Court, as required by the Act for the relief of Insolvent Debtors. MAIDSTONE ASSIZES, MARCH V.. James Morlrros and George Rogers were indicted for feloniously stealing, on the 14th of September, 1818, at a place called Boo•-hill, in this county, a flock of sheep, consisting of 101 in number. Mor gan was found Guilty—Death ; Itoers, Acquitted. CRAMP AND ANOTUER V. BAYLEY, CLEKK. This was a case of rather a singular nature. It was an action -if trover by the plaintiffs, as Church wardens of the parish of St. John the Baptist, Mar gate, against the defendant, as Rector of that parish, to recover the value of certain black cloth which had been put up in the Parish Church in respect to the memory of the late Princess Charlotte of Wales, but which the defendant, the Rector, had converted into hi, own use by having it made up into coats, waist coats, and other articles of apparel. After healing the evidence, which merely went to the alleged fact, Mr. Justice BAY LEY, in his address to the Jury, laid it down as the rule of law, that no person had a right to hang up what are called orna-' meats in the Church, without the leave of the Rector, because the freehold of the Church was in him, and be might make his own terms for that leave. In general, where private individuals hung black cloth in the Parish Church, with the concurrence of the Rector, there was a kind of understanding between them that the cloth became the property of the Rec tor. In the present case, however, there had been no bargain between the plaintiffs and the defendant, with respect to the terms upon which the cloth was to be hung in the Church, and consequently the latter had no right ►o take any portion of the cloth, because by law he was not entitled to take such a property, un less by matter of arrangement or agreement between the parlies to whom it belonged. Under these cir cumstances the plaintiffs were entitled to a verdict for tie value of the cloth which the defendant had converted to his own use. The Jury found for the Pl3.intiffs—Damages £l5. MARCH 20. THE ICING V. WILLIAM WRIGHT AND OTHERS. This was an indictment against the defendants, William Wright, Hoary Dirm, William Ebers, James Waters, and SA Smith, for a riot committed at Gravesend, on the 4th of July last. There was a se cond count, which charged them with an assau't upon Robert Pierce Cruden, Esq. Mayor of the town of Gravesend, in the execution of his office, while endeavouring to quell the riot above-mentioned. • It. P. Gruden, Esq. was examined. He was pro ceeding to state, that in consequence of complaints made against watermen, for the exorbitant demands they were in the habit of making, the Corporation had published certain Regulations, which had been stutic up in various•parts of the town, when Mr. GURNEY interposed, and objected to any refe rence being had to such notices, contending that the Corporation had no right whatever to interfere with the boatmens fares. Mr. Justice BAYLEY said he had no difficulty in declarin:7 that it would be an act of extortion for a boatman to take a larger fare than he was legally entitled to, and he would not say that it WilS not liable to he criminally punished ; at the same time, however, he was not prepared to give any opinion as to the proceedings of the Mayor in the regulation of the fares. Mr. Cruden then proceeded in his evidence, and r:ated, that in consequence of being disturbed by the noise in the street, at Gravesend, about eleven o'clock at night, on the 4th of July, he got up and called. to his assistance Robert Barnett, Serjeant at Mace. There was a mob assembled, cemisting of about SO or 100 persons. He advanced to the head of the mob, and seized a person whom he afterwards dis covered to be William Wright, the defendant. There was immediately a violent struggle made to rescue him, some people crying out, Rescue him—We are a'.l freemen here—Why are we to be taken by one man ?" Witness endeavoured to secure his pri soner, by taking him towards a door that was open, but he was prevented by being struck down by one of the persons in the crowd. Ile saw the defendant Taylor afterwards, who stated to him that he was en:;aged in offering him assistance and in getting him on - the ground when struck ; and witness did not know that that was not the case. He could not swear to any of the other defendants. Edward Collyer, , a boatmaster at Gravesend, re membered the disturbance on the night of the of July : he heard the noise el laic mob before he saw thew he went to his - door, and he saw that the y . pla:ing a fiddle and blowing a horn. Witness Lad gone to the Mayor at seven o'clock the same; evennig, to complain of so= waterrach who bad u;0,1 one of the masters of his boats. Witness lived three doors of the Mayor. The mob groaned and hissed as they passed the Mayor's door, and did the same as they passed witness s. The mob con sisted of all descriptions of people—toen, women, and •children. lie did not know any of them. Cross-examined by Mr. GunlZEv.--There was not the least disposition to riot amongSt the people. He did not see them insult any body. 'Hwy had been disposed to insult any one, be believed it would have been himself. They had one fiddle and a fog-horn, blown on the Thames in foggy weather. Robert 13arnett, the Serjealit-at-Mace, gave nearly the same te , tiniony as the Mayor. He heard one horn bho.vinq ; the mob consisted of about 83 or 100 meat, WO!!"Cil, and children: he did not sec any blow struck by any body. lie was himself thrown down by the pressure of the c,-owd ; he heard some man say, " All go, or none." John Taylor was in the crowd, but he did not see him take any active pact. He did not see the other defendants there. William Parsons was called to prove that he saw placards stuck in the hats of some of the crowd.— lie only saw two or three pieces of white paper, but he did not see what was upon them. He saw none of the defendants there. There was no disposition in the people to riot. There was nothing but blow ing of horns. - Mr. JtiviCe BATLEY here interposed; and after ' commune sting with the Counsel on both sides, told the Jury he thought that the defendants must be ac quitted upon this evidence. As to the propriety of the prosecution he had no doubt, and he thought the public were very much indebted to the Mayor for the courage and activity which he had shewn in endeavonting to suppress the disturbance, which might hisve ended more seriously. It was the ditty, however, of the Jury, on the evidence adduced, to acquit the defendants.—Verdict,Not CAMBIIIDGP ASSIZES. UTTERING FORGED NoTEs.—Jolzn Macpire and Michael Codey were tried on Wednesday before Mr. Baron GRAHAM, on a charge of feloniously, know ingly, and wilfully uttering forged El Bank of Eng land notes, at Icklezon, on the 25th of September last. The facts were very clearly proved, and the Jury found both prisoners Guilty, when the Learned Judge passed sentence of death upon them in his usual impressive manner. His Lordship gave Codey reason to expect that the dreadful sentence would not be carried into execution upon him, he having pleaded guilty to the minor offence. The Judge gave Mac quire no hope of mercy. REALES V. WILKINSON. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, a re spectable merchant in Cambridge, against the de fendant. who is a clergyman, for a libel written by him, and inserted in a periodical work called the Anti-Jacobin Review, of September last. It imputed to the plaintiff, in very gross language, that he had, in a transaction with a person who had been a partner with him in the purchase of Lottery Tickets, appro priated to himself the whole of a Lottery Ticket, of which his partner should have had a share. Mr. STORKS having opened the pleadings, Mr. Serjeant BLosszrr opened the case by stating, that the libel in question was one for which he should have had to have called for exemplary damages, if the object of the plaintiff in bringing the action had not been satisfied by the course which the defendant had been wisely advised to pursue. Mr. Beaks had resorted to a civil instead of a criminal prosecution, in order to allow to the defendant the opportunity of proving, if he was able, the truth of the charge, and of covering the plaintiff with shame, if he was de serving of it. But the defendant was so far from being able to do this, that he was left without de fence ; and as he had fully acknowledged the false hood and total want of foundation of his accusation, and ha.l instructed his Counsel to make the same pub-, lic avowal in Court, the plaintiff, who sought the vindication of his character, and not damages, would call upon the Jury for only a nominal verdict. Mr. Serjeant FRERE, in the name of the defendant, expressed his contrition for having bees the author of so unfounded and unwarrantable an attack into which he had fallen in the course of a political dis cussion—the object of the plaintiff in the action, he was convinced, was reparation only for the injury lie might have sustained ; and this he would fully obtain by the public avowal on the part of the de fendant, of his innocence of the charge imputed to him, which he did not hesitate to make in the most unqualified manner. 1 he Jury, under the direction of the learned Judge who observed that the libel was a most gross one, found, by the consent of the plaintiff, a verdict for nominal damages. EXETER ASSIZES, MARCH is. CONVICTION FOR BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION. AY[ V. SIR MANASSEH LOPEZ , BART. _ _ _ This indictment charged the Defendant with hav ing, by himself and by certain agents, corrupted and bribed several of the Electors of the Borough of Grampound. Mr. Serjeant Peta, opened the case on the part of the Crown, which he described as one of the most important cases which had ever presented itself to `the consideration of a Jury. Here was conduct which' struck at the very root of that greatest blessing of our Constitution, the Freedom of Election. The sub ject of representation had been much discussed ; va rious were the opinions entertained upon that subject: but all must agree, that the best way of preserving the.pu:ity of representation was to visit severely acts like those with which the defendant stood charged, in every instance in which they should, by good for tune, be detected. TLe Borough of Grampound (the Learned Serjeant continued) contained sixty voters, cla'rning that right in respect of being freemen. In , November, 1915, a meeting took place between Sir, M. Lopez and a man of the name of Hoare, .who, would be called as a witness. Hoare being a voter of Grampound, and the object of the meeting was to adjust terms for bringing Sir M. Lopez in for the Borough. This was to be effected by a loan of 1:: 1 .000 to the Electors ; this loan being really a gift, and the price cf their votes. In addition to the evi dence of Mr. Hoare and other Gentlemen, the Learn ed Serjeant would produce letters from Sir M. Lopez, himself, which could leave no doubt upon the nature of the transaction. A number of letters were then r read from Si r M. * H Lopez, and from Mr.unt, his SOlicitor, addressed for the most part to Mr. Wm. Hoare. By these let ters it appeared that Mr..Huot was the confidential. Solicitor of Sir M. Lopee, and that he was the avnt employed to mAaage the business o this Election ; that 1.:2000 was to be pzid upon securing 11‘; voters ; that the cm° was to be a loan, and to he paid by Mr. Hunt, After expending considerable sans, it appeared that Sir M. Lopez felt rater insecure as to his interest. Mr. Teed, the present Petitioner fur Grampound, paid a visit to the j.lcrotill, ai,d Sir M. Lopez declared , in cine of his lette: s, th.st far frwo being alarmed by Mr.TeeLfs joarucy, if that (,::,!:le •man would place him ifs. the situation in which he stood beibre the commencement of the negociation, he (Sir M.) would• resign his interest to hint. One of these letters, in which, speaking of the Elccters of Grampound, Sir M. Loiter, says, " 11 tl , .ey can fin., any Gentleman who will pay th"•nl better, they may transfer their services to him." And another, in which Sir M. hopes he shall not be put to the addi tional expense of a dinner to the voters, c:.cited con siderable met ri molt. William lloare being examined by Mr. G VELEM, swore that he was an A lderman c Grampound ; that in November, 1814, he went to London, and saw Sir M. Lopez at his house in Arlington-stre , A : that he gave Sir M. Lopez a letter of introduction from Sir John Derring ; that Sir M. Lopez said lie heard there was an opening in the Borough of G:amponnd, and that he should be coming dots a so.):1, and would see witness on the business; that Sir M. Lopes re. quested witness to consult the rest of the Magistrates and Freemen on the subject, and write him word ; I that witness then told Sir M. Lopez that the Electors must he satisfied, and £2OOO would be necessary for that purpose ; that after he returned to Grampound, he wrote to Sir M. Lopez on the subject, and receiv ed an answer. In the beginning of the month of December he met Sir M. Lopez at Plymouth, that he went with him to Mr. Hunt's office, where he saw Mr. Hunt ; that he then explained to Sir M. in the presence of Hunt, that the Fr;:erren winzed £2oa3, and that Sir M. Lopez said Hunt should come down ; that Hunt was at Grampound twice; that on the first occasion he did not see so many of the Freemen as he expected, and only stayed a few hours ; that lie afterwards met Hunt by appointment at St. Austel, and Hunt came again to Grampound, where be saw about 40 of the Freemen ; that he told Hunt that the Freemen expected £5O each that Hunt said that could not be ; that they could have only £35 each ; that Hunt then desired him (witness) to send the Voters into the room (a room at an inn) one by ore; that he did so: that Hunt's clerk, Mr. Rawle, was in the room, and John Brown, a voter, when witness left it ; that Symons was not introduced at this time : that he saw Sir M. Lopez some months after, at his seat near Plymouth, and that Sir M. Lopez then said " I have secured Symons; I have done something for him here ;" touching the palm of his hand. That he afterwards introduced Allen, a voter, to Hunt, who did not seem inclined to receive him, as they had already got a majority. On being cross-examined by Mr. ADAM, he said, that when Mr. Teed and Mr. Lambe, his solicitor, came down, he told them that he had a letter from Sir M. Lopez, in which Sir M. said he would relin quish his claim to any Gentleman who would do better by the Borough. That as he was looking for this letter among others from Sir M. Lopez, Mr. Lambe said, " I will look for it ;" that Mr. Lambe' then took all the letters, and said he would return them ; that they hod not been returned; that he was anxious to have them back, lest people should sup pose he had told them. When Hunt came to Gram pound the second time, and witness sent in the free men one by one, he did not see any one receive any money.—Did you receive any money?—Yes, I did. Mr. Justice HOLDOVD.—I ought to tell you, you are not bound to answer any question which may criminate yourself. Mr. ADAMS.—I now put the question again. Did you receive any money ? Witness.—l do no: choose to answer. Mr. Teed, examined by Mr. Serjeant PELL, said, he was an unsuccessful candidate for Grampound; last election, and was at the present moment a peti tioner. That in August, 1817, he received from Isaac Watts, a voter of Grampound, a paper contain ing the names of the voters who had been bribed by Sir M. Lopez; and that Watts told him the respec tive sums which had been paid, which ho put down against the respective names • that he called en Sir M. Lopez, in London ; that he told Sir M. Lopez he called at he desire of Mr. Watts, to knew what he (Sir M. Lopez) intended to do resrecting Gram-' pound. If he (Sir M. Lopez) would be content with one scat, he (Mr. Teed) might have the other; 1 that witness then told Sir M. Lopez he was acquain ted with his proceedings at Grampound, and pro duced the list he had received from Watts; that Sir' M. Lopez merely expressed his surprise where. the witness could have got so correct a list. That Sir M. Lopez said that the sums were very correct,_ cept that he had paid more tc, some than was put ' 1 down. The witness told Sir M. 1, Ipez, that he ard the electors were subject to a psosecution ; that Sir M. Lopez then said he would protect the eli..:tors, if it cost hint 01001000. That he had taken Counsel's opinion, and that the electors were not liable, because 'twn years had elapsed since the transaction On his cross-examination by Mr. ADAMS—Mr, Teed said, that he did not tell Sir M. Lore?. that he should be prosecuted ; but only, that he was liable to prosecution. That the letters were taken from Hoare by Mr. Lambe, with the consent of witness ; and that he (witness) did not choose to return them when he discovered their contents. Mr. Moont argued, on the past of the defendant, that the money in question had been given from cha ritable motives, to assist the Borough of Grampound, which was at that time in great distress. tic com mented 4 considerable length upon the testiniony of the various witnesses who had been called on the part of the prosecution. The Mr. Hoares, he said, stood convicted, by their own confession of the very crime which they were a tt em p t i ng to charge upon Eir M. Lopez. 'fhcy were goae unworthy of credit. The Jury should be cautious. If a landlord lowered his rents to assist his tenants, and WAS afterwards re turned by their votes to Parliartera, would that cen stiLute bribery ? Where w.!c the eifference in the pre sent case? The Learned Counsel then commented with 'orne severity upon the (!vidence 9f Mr. Teed; and conclueled %kith a hope, that if the Jury eater twined any doubt upon the case, they would.givc the ' benefit of that doubt to the accused party. Mr. Justice Houma summed up Cue evidence at dead a • - den , . PI j considerable length, and expresse r : 5 i . ",.: v.,., . if the witnesses were to be relied o t!0. ' ,.. °1' ,.. 1 ,, 1 fA.tsluynlnd made defoute—adTiaolteGju24. ''':). "(1...: " .4' t be be i lm al x re. , The trial lasted more than four :sou was crowded to excess. • .4. 1 The defendant will be br , ng'ra op for jua,,,, : the King's Bench in the ensuing term. '. 44 .4 ' YORK. Farah Anderwm, who sont her daughter's ntr:- . .„ hest ani chi: d, in a basket, by the Thor::e pail...- -- Hall, addressed t o M. Maples, of Thn rile , i:, -rel l af quence of which the c hild di e d soon - ‘er r. • 7 4 , ''''' • • ceire , .l try the Doctor in November Inv, 7 sa t •,. . -..• ,„.,, or the capit•il charge of doing; so siteeaten: ~ 1 , '' el mit murder, but '.'as found tinily of ;.u:,; ~. ,t,,, Sentence (Is (erred. - 8.. At the 'Fork Assizes, an inn!-eoper 7.,. 0z ,i 1 Shaw recovered £l3. 17s. 6d. from :... Fo l ,-. 1 . ~„, • I 4 Marmaduke I lorsley, for pz!tkairrs, s:,r,-, c ~.- • . • J excited much merriment is Court : one ;::::, t ., VII " To damage done to the bed you slept ti t ii: ; ..... another, ~ To a man for pickin:g you yr on t!'.n tr i II el and r;:bbing you down with stra..v. Is:— . l - .;• ;Jut. , u BARoN, v. l i n tried the cause, lameat;:i that ..., b t i t , gr. undefended deprived the Court and the c0...a..r.. (e 111 further warming insigit into the consevcnce6 , 44 - - .11, 1 1 kermess ! -- 60 Bow-ovaszt.—Saturday, H. Thatcher and 7'. Pre ; ... I char e ed with uttering 3 farged .€.5 not. The prisce.ve e.., L hi the Rose and Crown Tavern, in Clare -court, zed hart. ; , ', vs 5.,-,lpt.r, called fur wine, ,and tendered a £5 WIC in paemze i ,- Ilse-needed. Meese .s-irouse.--Saturday, D. Hayes, alias ,I)haaatt,ilasb deism . alias 0' 110 ra, was finally examieed upon a chat: 44m- II ing a for g ed Bank of England note of el. The pet , a. Sol l one of these tried at the Oki Bailey Seuitnia ia Jut:al La m a similar charge, anti acquitted.—relly committed. sir Ihs CLERICAL L\'77::I,LI(;ENCE. ED .......... pul CAtIBRIDGI, ~1., , II czt :9. itOLI , 11011 The Chancellor's Gold halals for the best Profitines i 111 Classical Learning among the commencicg 11a:he:ars o ' A e ' lOM were yesterday adieLged to Mr. Thomas Thorp, of Ire- arpol Colle g e ; and Mr. Alt :ander Nialcolm Wale, i t . J o le ', eee..,' un OXFORD, AIARCH P.O. A f The Rev. Ilc•i;i:isin Pierson, SyIII , ‘IVI, ALA. Fellow of W. lio ham College, and the Per. Edward Cordw• l'i, M.A. relive,: n x Brasennose College, have been appointed Politic lisarninur,. ~ I The following Degrzes have been cooferred: A I ' Rev. Charles Valentine Le Grine, 11. A. of Trinity Cell e - sP' 'Cambridge, admitted ad cerdem. e lm DACIILLOS. IN cren. LAC-. ev Rev. Robert Allen, Fellow of New College. sat SLASTRPS or A RIN. IMUI Pee. William Watson Dickina. of Merton Garage. taco John Rodbard atin, of Christ (leech. ash, Rev. Charli; Scr:se Dickins, of Oriel Colleer- . ,r Pee. Joie liarc Pinghans, of a asennose College. res c Pew. J.itir:s lieu, of Trinity College. eon • Bs IAC)IRLORS OP ARTS. 'William Tirekins, of liengennose Calle r .. Thomas Welch liant, Esq. of Christ Church, Graad Cm. i pounder. I GI Thomas George Corbett, of Christ Church. ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTIONS. • Ft A Dispensation has passed the Great Seal, to enable ilea T. T. Welmsky, B.D. to hold the Rectory of St. Vaiit, Far Cop ter-lane, London, :with the Rectory of Haswell, 3.ithilt sex; a h the former of which he was colleted by the Archbishop of Cu- • • i terbstry, and to the latter by the Bishop of London. Lord Viscount Anson has appointed the Rev. W. IL IL G Hartley, of Bucklebtiy-House, one of his Lordthip's Desesta. AN Char,Lins. We The Itev. Thomas Strong is prrseatcd to the Rectory cf The AN berton, in SuEalk. ' Tie. Iles/. Edmund Giay, B.A. to the Rectory of Kirby 7.....- pertori, Yorkshire. E Ilene Franei. Coleman, M.A. to the Rectory of Humbs.:4la toe Diocese of Hereiord. 'I Rev. Denny Earners, LLB. to the Archdeseor.er of Sala Bee. John Ninthly, D.D. to the Peetory of fleetest V ' i • , Boxtead, in Suffolk. 1 4 We are authorised to enure the Public, that there is no era 4 in the story of the ex traoi dinary Mushroom, said to kw to el lock a hogshead of wine to the tap of the cellar of Sir Josiru Rees, II and which we copied from another Journal. Pa We are requested to inform our Readers, 0.-.:t 0 Messrs. COOPER and Co. Surgeons, ofCharlotta-thaut, I Great Cliarlotte-.street, Blackfriars-road, have, in co-.- sequence of their extensive practice, and for tke at. Is us commodation of patients at tbeWest-end of the tows, lora established a Medical Board in Woodstock-street,Ox- jh ford -street, a few doors from Bond-street, where a : t 7: Physician, of 40 Yeats experience, and a Surgeon i to great eminence, reside, and where all the Hoard atm- Pi nately attend, t he whole of whom are Members nt tie Royal Colleges—that thousands have been restored to Ili. perfect health by their united talents is universaEY ol! 31 acknowledged, many of whom had been discharged from I lospii.ds, and Otherwise impropeily treiceo.— T Tey are consulted at Woodstock-House, Wee dstocl- * et street, from Light in the Morning un til Eights adtle \i ;ht ; and at the Nl e di ca l B oar d, 'Cliarlatte-10..r.t. all Ilh'ickti iars-;.oad, from twelve till eight in the even. - Tres —Mocl- , -.:cs have advice gratis ever, evening nee six till eight, at both houses, and on Sunday mernia;i in i until melve o'clock.----N. B. Messrs. COOrat and IC. tor ...... beg to observe, they have no connection with 3 -7 other ('cot ern, therefore all letters are to Le direc-' 1 Ttiii to Charlotte-House, adjoining Illackfriars-roar. .. .14 in BIRTH& Tuesday, at Biaxial) parsonage, the Lady of the Rae. • ' A Roberts, of a ion. die Thursday. of sz: daughter.nnligt,,ati h, the pswic , , . ...ady of V% - rn... - '1 ::.'. t', F,,1. n.N Cu hLARRIEIX The Rev. George Peake, to Matilda, You•ne I the late Jehn Ring, Riq. of Leicester. pat 'Flea Rev. A. Clarkso::, ef limeley, Yorks!.:re, to Nisi z • - • .1 ep both C. Wileocke, of Isl.agton. let Rev. l'ructer liobinsan, M.A. of Dudley, to lierrie.77•f• ' air daughter of the bate Josiah M a ynard, of Melton, Iorksl; • st dazga•e• DIED. • Rev. It. Dixon, Rector of Claxby, near Ceistor. lk Rev. R. C. T. Pate:Lion, nectar of Milsted and F::!tt• I in Kent. I 1 reLraday. at his house in Civhanioroad, raw— 4 -- 1, - - - 1 E 4. Clerk ci the Journals of the House of Peers. ~ . March 11, le Duke -streLt, Beth, the Itev. Wm. Mi r, ' ' Vicar of llornchurcla, Leiea, aad formerly FiZonr of ''..4-'l' lege, Oxford. • tut Fla Re S e u te n r ja ci';ie l' atl lini et h ton t ' , ag b Pd ock 6 3, B ,in ti r late ße I F .. e ß lio ich w ar oi l M G°l .:e de' net v " . lege, G e ra r d. 1 liar& I 4, at JeillS Wiese, Oxford, in the 2i st yea: or s:s; I William, at cusid son of Witham Edwards, Esq. of Ile— I Denbighelfire.-1 le had retired to rest en the preach:lF e:••• • i in appatenf gcsed Itteilth, excepting his hi:gem-Ay cal'•' : 1 • of a Azle cold, atal on the foitewit.g m ornieg he wa. .. . Lb dead by his lorerant, 'riving expired to all ... (1 -ex.nace 1 i•• a strtiggl... IA .—...„...—......-.. , —........--. --....—. —..-- -- ...., ~. Irityr 'IrATISIL at LONVON BRIDOR TO-3 . .Izs.l• • ii Mt cemg e 0 maim s After 1.: ;‘%l • ... = ..-- Attention • e e g g ----or es .. re ..___ . I.ON HON : Pzinte4 and ri!ili.tiesl by Levet KWs r .. " - i P Marc, Tertyle-ner, •ai I • It,