Star. — London, England, 1801-08-03 00:00:00

stssizzi NORWICH, Ave 1.44-. w•-.llefrite Lord Chef Ba ron MA COON •LO and 1:10n. Mr. Baron H he, ROBERT MAII,H,A4i, „Alit. of Walton 3EtillWlßo4 High Sher.ff. Mr. Baron 14OT H A lA, in his Addreft to the Grand Jury, obferved that having fo frequently had the honour of bearing his hltoetty's Commit - - lion in this county, he ill ould not trouble thrift with a regular and fiwrnal charge, knowing as he, die the ability and fidelity with which they had als ways difkharged that important ditty; he hatd therefore on the prelent occafion Merely to folicit from them that attention which he had e xpekienedd foh former occafions. To tht honours-greatly to the honour of the magiftraty of the county, the Calendar was uncommonly &oft, and the %fences of that nature as not to require any pardeeleit eft' pidation from him.• One obferration, howeeet, he thought it necessary to make, vit. that the Vas not in die Calendar, nor. had he heard 01',W •Ifingle commitment for any riot or tunlult At, . fount of the unexampled high Price of provrt ' &xi5...4 deaf be obvious that flick proceeding) when they did occur, could have tin other elf" than to increafe the evil fo much fklt by all dn. . fcriptions of people--and when offences of this tit 4 . cure were folly proved, they muff be punished with exemplary everity, not only for the prefer vation of the public peace but alfo for the fecu rity of private property.—When, therefore, (fold .his Lordfhip). we fee men in the lowell ranks altd degrees of life, preffed down by penury and teas, patiently &Inuit to the difpenfations or Pam Ds s c c—one cannot but adMi re them fortheir fort tearance and fortitude—one cannot but honour aitil refpeet them a s peace able fubj efteatid as goodehri ans. It was RICO a tau& a fat; seadion cairn to thick that there wa s not one pea - on charged with fedition, or with an attempt to tubvert the good order aid government of the country. Whila other nation. Were differing from the dire ettcets of extended 'arfare, anarchy and irreligion, it was not to espeeted but that we fhould come in for Our fhatecif difficulties and dangers—whether ere fhall be able to - the • ' . the form Was only vents, but ford; tofatt defend with energy institutions of our &area rights, the um and that holy and . us confolation here. elk bereaften—wat Were all prepared and ip concluded a molt and underftandings -null be remembered _ _ no* called upon faccefsful, billets Virtue _ that principle, under _ bleffing : might look forward' with confidence tO a happy termination of our pet: - fent dill-milks and difficulties. Let us all, there-, Paid his Lnrdfhip, colleftively and individu- 1 Idly adhere to the paths of rectitude and virtue, • Iphich can alone make us a prafPerons and a happy ; istople. Alexander Goodbody, aged 23, and Ambrofe Goodbody, aged so, were indieed for Ik:ding five Cheep, the property of Mr. J. Bradford, farmer ) at Tivetfhall cum Godwick, on the night of May rnth laft. The profeentor depofed, that on that day he told his (beep in the prefence of Moulton, a butcher, and that they thvounted to feiten feore and one ; and that etn the x ill, when he again told them, he round he had loft fit of them. Having teen the jrifoners on the sgrh riding actors his premifes, and their brother, John Goodbody (again ft whom the- Grand Jury for want of facient evidence, Were unable to find a bill) laying down about half a mile of; the profecutor fufpeCted them to be the perfons who had frolen his Cheep, which were afterwards found on the premifes of Mr. Harper, of Upwell, (so miles off) who (wore that he had bought them of the prifoners at the bar, fuppofing that they had been fent by their brother Joh* Goodbody, who was to have purchafed fame (beep for him. Mr. Bradford and hit fervant who hall marked the Rock, (wore pofitivvely to the Beep ; and a-a-a Bradfield (wore that very early on the morning of the loth he met the prifoners , on the Connors going to Upwell, driving there &cep. lie knew the prifoners were dealers in Rock, but had never heard any thing againft their chatadersi Mr. Benham and Mr. Dungar, of Lexharn, Paid they bad known Ale tender five or fix years, and that he was a very hood and induarioas young plan; and a witneh recolleited teeing and (peaks . Jug to Alexander at his own houfe, Which is about' • fix miles of, at ten o'clock on the night of the lcitha at which dine he was preparing to go to bed. . The Jury, after confulting . together a co n , able time, found both the p rifoners Gwifj, bias* commended them to mercy. Henry Lavine, aged at, (an old offender) indidted for felonioufly breaking into the dwelling . houfe of Mr. Monlier, of Wort well, in the night of the I 3tll March laft, and dealing thereont film:try articles ; and likewitb for dealing a forrel gelding, the property of Ili:. linen, of the farm place-- the fads being clearly proved, he was found guilty The Judge paired fentence of death on the two Goodbodye—but their lives will be famed—MC from certain favourable circuit:4l'l'sec' which haiw &tee taanfpired, it is thought that his Majelleul mercy will be (till further extended toy/mailbags. • Robert Baley was indicted for ftealing films that' perfon of Mr. T. Blunderfield, of Heelnagbasm a ll . canvas pude, containing three guineas and a half in gold. Mr. Blundedeld_depofed t. dtat laft Bangay fair Jay, as he was (tending at Nlr.Canhim's door, at • Ditchltigham, thttt feDows ndbeel iturefslbe toed and puttied him back into the palfife, nid that One dr them (the prifonet) laid bold oThim by tilt iticulders, exclaiming that the bullocks were coin ing—at that moment his pale was taken from him, which be immediately milled—the 'prifonet 'Wu (non after taken, and Ins clothes crammed, in the pretence of feveral other perfonsa wile& pockets Vitiarplifttod . thot day, antlithout Gli vial taltett t floes him. -o-The tidier two fellows streainped. His Lordthiti faid, there • w* nOt fufEcient evi dence asainti the prifoner to lender it needier/ to call upon him for leis defence; there was no proof Of his having beet the perfon who getlntily pitied Mt. Blundertield's poeketi indeed it was not likely.that he vote, becatife at the time the ptitheer's heads • were up to the prOfeeutoe's throat—tilson this evi dence, therefore, whaterci their tlifpieions might ii be, he Imill be acquitted. . . The jury , accordingly atquitted the prifotter.- , - The Judge however told him, he had had a very 1 harrow efcape--with very little more evidence he • tilufi have been totwitted, and he (humid certainly have fent him to Botany Bay for the Litreeny. Be had very hole dotitit of his havitg been con temned in the •befloeflo Or of his bekingibg to 'a' ling of pick-poeketo William Beata, for a inifderheinbr, in emir* beating a mare belongiag to Mr. Bald Win, of Wateott, his mailer, and burning her mouth with Oil of vitriol, was fentenced to be kept , to hard la bour for twelee iiiottths. „ . • No Pi-di - mut& appeared again& Hebert Hardy,, charged With e rept. . .. ,_ No true bill againfi Jorefh Woominlis John Pigitoite, and Raehael Neethan here abs quitted.—Lawne is left for teems** .. . ' NISI ECUS CARISEII.—DYRALL nosaaiiii This adiiun was brought to Yeeover from the Dem:lath, (a e.iniettit al. ha* the liftilett 6f. 'Coro penalties, bider, t ' Caine tatti>s, for haling a brace of platil'atifa in is PolfelEnti. TbC.thdion • .lias fhpported by the evidenhe tlf s perfoti of the taint oijordah, who ttated.thatiat had in lithely 'hit fold eleven brat * ntitra ballot filleatahte tp bit Read, by 114:041 One brit! et thedi has fold in the wirbefs's pretence to the de/eeder*: Tiiis ettidente, it appeared, had been given by the irlt- • net's, in, an examination before Lord Sortie/4o Ind Mtonfequenee of his tellimony,feveralnetiohe had been commenced, all of which had been (top. , pad, except that againfi the pmfetit defentialit,i- Mr. Reeve*, on the part et the defendaftt, peer; dueed So viitnetres who hid *mein the ddeb dant iota tonfiderable tithe; lied *he beta bf them alledged, that he wet a Period Of lb lisiel a charafter, that they could give nit credit' , whatever to his tefilmo3, even upon oath:l-. Read was alb examin ' and admitted that he had had dealings with the defindant; aid that about the time fpeeified, he had pare/mad from about iliac to &ors tray aitt I a hail r of birth of bttt that to the to 4 f. his ineevhafre, he 14c1 never dealt with the defenclant, and hA- not f4d him any of the birds which he !Ardis/14 of ktdain• As *dee appeared tome prevarication in Read's evidence, the Loco CHIEF BARON Melted hitt Very cicifely with force unexpeded queficohs eclatieelo the difpofal of the birds, the anfWer's to which were fo unfatisfadory to his Lordthip, that he declared he did not believe a word the witnefs had fpoken. His Lordfhip, oft addrett•tig the Juty phlttved that it had beet very properly remartedbe the Counfel in fupport of the adiois, (Mt. Wi s soh ) that poaching was she parent of moil etiotencius evils, by imeducing idle and diforderly sn habiw , which generally ended in ore pernicious Wanes : the prefent cafe, hi faid , afforded a honentable n- Ranee of the truth of this ohfereatiob, a,of-t o men of this damp, who had jug been-eximined, one of them mutt have -been tuilty of the moil wilful and torrupt pelury. The jury, without hefitation, found a verdid for the plaintiff with the amount of the penalties. se•Loisic O. RALIERE. The plaintiff, a grocer in Norwich, brought this anion againtt the defendant, who is a Ih i rgeon at Muidefley, in Norfolk, to recover 4 1. ts.lieiegthe amount of two parcels of goods, feat to the de fendant according to order.—The plaintiff made 'out the following cafe :—ln January, shoo, a Mifs. Wilton, (who then boarded at the defendant's) called at the plaintiff's ( hop, and ordered the firll parcel of goods, to be fent for Mr. Kaliere, at the Cattle and Lion, Norwich, which was accordingly . done, and Mr. Kaliere afterwards - called- en thee' plaintiff and idled if the bill was made out for Mt goods, and faid that if it was iie would pay it, Thie. plaintiff, however, had not then made out the bail, and faid that he would either fend it to Mr. Kaliete, ' , or would call on him with it when he travelled that way. On Saturday, the Bth of March, t lloa, another order was delivered to the Plaintiff, in the Defers ' dent's hand-writing, for another parcel of goods, to be fent by the citrig.—This order was delivered bye porterwomat ; Who received it from a Mrs. Hem: fell, and the goods were Ant to the carrkr, and delivered by him to the Defendant ettorefmglyo— This cafe was Made out bythe evidetioe of the flt ' i man, apprentice, and porter of Mt. Bpalding ' Plaintiff, by the porter-woman, Who-delivered , fecund order, by the carrier, and by a perfon who , proved the hand.writing of the Defendant.—Oft' the part of the Defendant, Mr.Wilfon Rated, ;b a h , i theft goods were purehafed by Mill Wilfon, who; ' had 1i -teen the fir* order; that the 'had lived in' :Norwich, and was well known to the Plaintiff, who', ' i had given 'credit to eve, and not tb the Dereittla4 l who was a total lb-anger to him, mod that the Des fendant's Attdeney had admitted this to be the cafe, as he would have received the athotmt Vital' A perfbit employed by Mill Wilkes, to difcheerge• it, if there had mot been Come affereeetcliboht ' eons. In fupport of this cafes e female noqualon' awe of Mifs Wilfon was tidied, who dipohrli,' that /L,, (the wiinefs)•hitel green the feeovid order at Mifs 'Wilfon's Wire, to the Phintiff, at bit' i fhop, in the prefence of his wife ; that it oral given on the Friday ewe* levee/or -to- doe ant mentioned by the Plaintiff's wimeffee ; that it' was then expreffed by her to be on Myra ?VOW 'wary : and that thefe le g nd oods were intended by 1 her as prefent to the ant,to whom the wed under fame obligations.—She alit Rated, that (he' had offered the D ef endant's Attorney the anionhe' 'of the de on Mrs Wilfoo's aceount, and that 114, bad refuted to receive it, boniuk The would not pay him (even guineas, for the colts, which hid' then accrued ; and (be denied having told the; Plaintiff that the Defendant ou g ht t o 4,004 tht 'bill, and haringuied lime opprohriope.tchee,_,As. (peeing ban for his having Miffed to to Se: - 'TS coOtrovertai tifillitifilOilb. Witiltintollt, on t/le. 4iavt .ofthe kifentbuits t:gott called t h e . Plaifitirs rho matt whp dispelled, that he was its dig lop and Wartshoufe adjoining, the Whole of the Friday eveliitig, and Ina have fedi or hears the winie s 'if ate Hid tidied thetk.file poster boniatt alto oimfbnied ter former usaish u iftiyo thsaihrlielivered ,the.fetonti Order; and the apprentice (wore, that Me loog converfation, which the •Defendant's wit. [ tiers had had with his , metier, on _the lubje4l, it lift pretence , die had ;lade it re of the eiprefflobs, refpeltifig the li/etch:dints Which Ihellit - pofitittly denied having uttered. Mr. liackibitilin, In alt animated reply commented with root fad:* oh the evidence rod cod by the . Defendant, affiniti ing the eitiethe unProbabffity that the 11,-tnit 'Scold giVit credit lb I) , olittg freenttialitiUktes ap.• 'Petotice, Who wise ti eintiveledgell to be ill gine' paysety f iti ptefitkenee toile Defenslantesibm , s a prokfilanal man ofAreditand tepatation. . I littleness or Prevarication in else Defendant's wi - , ~ nets, were filch, he obferired, Ai midi viii s eta , Vire *bare of het tat/finny ; aftd the titettfti Lanese if th6PliftitifPs attorney% having agreed .at mei de ' thi.A,,tilfrom hereon Mils Wilfdn's account s lied, on that ate debt was due irons Mils d I Si li bail die attorney's holinefs to receive h,s titfe detttited adds' any bcidtitho chat inti ' f it, without etstptirftErhotn.itoigilttebepil 1 —The Lord Chief on addrefting the Jur f l lamented that -iiiiiillietlitilineli had occurred, i I width, oft one ASS sr the otheri•firnd 'grdlt pe -, 1 jury ;Ma have Weis committed. He Oossenwit44l .minutely on the evidence which had beet gisfet, . and etkerved, thit as to the first order,. the evi- dence had clearly Audit on the Defendant—as to i the feconcl, he thotightithere wits a Whinge of td- 1 timoriy in favour of the Plaintiff's , cafts,..ithigh bad been fupported by a chain Of evideute tend' , 'to the fame ends The Magi& point for the con .' diPatic'h of the J otys , was, .whether AO ,e4,Vie 1 , Coed order, they wouldgive etiedit co the tettifinstly Of the Defendant's mitt e 4 oppofed as ithed bean .loriduit of tour wiTneffef on•dle pelt Offthe 214 '' 1 tktiff?--Tlre jury, withaatictielsg, fouedce 4iti for the Plaintiff, with rim it g ds ' * 4 I''' . ' Do I, en densife of Sat le aria iA if and Otnersi This was an eltiOnienti hinoght to eftahlifh the tide to an elate at Wortivell, under the direEtidn of the Court of •Chencery,:iti - Which Conn the 18022 of she Plaintiff had filed . a BM aOtill the .Defendaat for the profits of ,the eaeie'Soot 'the , death of* lan potiorretot+ .Mr Bissr, op behalf of the leffor of the Plaintiff, Sated to thiitl_4, that the eftote.ftstpieltion had beenclecifedisiWkr.i John Say, who died in ty63, to his fon, and in:l 'cafe the fonlhoald die without Iffue, to trufteds,' • terrain charitable purpofes.• • The (on died without ifrue, and the purples for which the. trult was created were Aufh as coold nett legidly Or forded into execution s being rendered void by the &ante of Mortal:dn. • The trufteess therefotie i (who were the prefent befendatsts) were ender* neteflity of holding the edam for the hens& of the heir at law t they had so beneficialiatereft its it theinfelves, and were ready to rafts" it to soy claimant who &outs' make good hit title It it Teti had beets, feireral elaitm to this prepet4, all of which had hitherto failed. The prefcbt claimant was the fon of a perfon who hid been! killed at the battle of Minden, is 1759, aid. Ciluire widow, at the time of Mr. Say's deceafe, was atoare of the right of her fon (then an infant) . tif .inherit the cam, hut had not the means of en forcing his elaiM. The failure of a late ejeeitneta 'had thrown con fi derable light on the prefent cafe, and the letfor now came forward with the hope of fully effablifbing his title, by tracing the pedigree of himrelf and the pers on . Lift kind tog cosnmon anceflor, who died in fecip. To ellahlitt this cafe a variety of written evidence was produced, but die claimantfailing to prove the deathof an elder lirotheP - of Ode Of his intellbts, and that this elder brother had died withirat fffue, the Lord Chief 'baron ditiaed a beilcuit. Ricci and another v. the Rte. Wk. 13 ti ;rot, This was an iftiOn the a tretPaft orrMr.lrellotvet's chic, at Haverlimd, 10 the' ocCupatton of the Plaintiffs...-it appeased in evidence, that the Defendant having ?ported upon Mt. Fellowet's elate,. the latter found it nectar! in Decent. bet, flit, to give hint notice not to do to in Iltaste.--.Notenthfiandhig_ this untie the De. fendant did 'port again m thefollowing nimb i but not in the mandir• he had before been actin: rorned to, fbr he no w confined hirnftlf to the roads 1 and paths upon the elate, (hooting at what hit 'dogs put up. Intobrequenee of this, Mr. &Howes• in ink brought an toffiOn agitinft the Deis t . dem, in which ?titer having fhlfrred judgment . to go by default, a Writ of enquiry was esecat., ed *rid the Jury g:kye Me. Witmer; tot. da- Wisites k lthith atMed tO the cofts of fnct, amounted a 44 , iesThis htiwerer,*Al not MIA* to deter the 'Thifelo&ut, %1., in December left, he, With. biracial perfbn, his Maid, Were hossespeo 14r. rel • es's efttte, die befindant beeping in the toads,' mid his friend (potting opal - the Plaintiff's land-.. or this litter ttefpatltbt *aims Wes brought, and Ilk yell &tend "IS etrdiet for the Plaintit. , ..ba.. r 1"1 "Ef • • It err*, _l. v. Datir-v&This was an anion of brought by the r lairitifF, who is Lotd of re e rbe OF - Ittrekheatti, and the principal Fro th diatibtftb, againn the Defendant, who. r i the temmt Ora thitin of *boot tao term, tinder Om felint4b4to, Eft. 'et Sprolettur„ in thhvoutity. The tre`fpaft *at tddlifted by the Defendant, who pleaded in jaftiicalfon of Vs 'cloim, at *tint to Mr. Mork. So needle a right of **elvers* steer that part Of Mmillsotchtfeitt Which belongs tb the peril% :of Itirtitheath. in doing this he pleaded t e b a v nipt i t i t r m a g t ri f e to h' 400, ald 300 undred, according . 0 the ufual TA od tf reckoning in that bad alto claimed dietight Or depafturing his %tap , and coached, toci hi Sntiou`s odor Modes..— .It. Merle is MTh Otvlter oft cortege and five rebel tut in Redfield,. As the edit* erb-s a thttry byttelbt to stfcertiln this right, the art was *WWI by Mr.' &tem SILIAS. 'on the patt ear the Illefekdoit, Who produced a sta- Piety of Mabee 'to eltaldflti hit client's right to Mt rof 'AM Ihs ii titterers= it the vilme in v . :! • 1 ~ zitap i,* . 7 ,a, • si ztimi Sir Lambert Blaekwelir 4a whith the right of foldentirth 'eras eaprefslt 4tfirtayed.. The . parith rain of Eackheath were theta, prOtlhttit; front whith.it appeared, that fi l o 'the year 1706, p s i the lime when thc Wwortspurehafed by Sir Lambert Blackwell _ ht. t 716, the ttnatit of thit farm had been chargeskto the ttackhentli tates pretlly on account of thd 100044 tflat netts; • that time to 1741, either "Sit L. B. ?x his fon Sir Charles Blackwell, (Cato loherltedthe e Rate froti his father) of their tfnaht, 'hail ciAtintiea eh sarge . ablty and that kiln Plitti fAt mteshad bett paid by Mr. Edward Drivey, tbe grandfather of the Deieodautt "AO . oCehiged•the rant from that time to it. dmthr about to pears flute. A perf on cam Trail "been eniploYed by the late Mr: Davey, illephdra, for Metre than twtnty years, and wto tad kttblllfthe form liffititoVe 4.b Years, was then willotto - prose that thi right of damp walk had ben d cupped during i thgt, time without .intev i zp_ non, and 700 Che ep had ibantiloes, and soo had Very etteritiefitly been titried2Sii the ctiminon by Mr. betty, itelnininefreithre to the buddrod.— , Thtfe flat *we oleo isidetellty other winitifes,try *bons it was limed; that MoDisney bad tundthept a floc* of lefs than 300 ,Oserit, and one of thefe Wititeigs depokci, that he hal, ter a Plart tiretrthis tight of 'Mr. atey:, and had at Met With Ably imertuption its eilleteilleg it: It appear- - dd. from the evidence, thin there was a eoneina latt right in *inhabitants of Racitheathtts turn** ,cattle on this common, arid - that the poe t land usually Alt the hag ferlll .- 11teitha it alto peered, that the wkde of this" ferns had not al ways beta cietupied by 'the woken who it atho right of fbeepwalk, but that, about half wfitliad •been in the occupation of a. Mr. crentl did not enjoy it* right. John Mork, Eflik e th er of the prefLoht - ptoprietoo, &pored, - dliarill t a d had the Ibli maftigetnent of the Sittietelhaitibtte Iran t7Bi. when it was ttthatfoil of the lore Sir Lambert Blackwell,. by r. Boycatt .„ and that au 1, this time the right of Ilieepwalk bad been reptaiiedTp reeognited Asy Mr. Stracey, who had applied to .14v, Maffei** this teeoetst, for his coo. fent to 'on inchafore of &when* and •had ereo elm Jot agent to him to neat : far. the sonithaft. ol the.*•epwalk, for which soak wait offered. .s . 'hVa Wruioa, on the part . of the Plalntiff;lngn dert ingetiioVci4cteech of cottilaerahle length, 14 • mitted-die Mghe fbeeptkatk, and Qid, that the Pole point for the confiderotion of the Joty,ysited)e extent of this right. It mull be limited. he °breve ed, as otherwife p woutddelimy the rights of other pet-foto to ttotv rm cqttle,' and ft . mutt be limited tietittas flit kittfi istritiht of keep to be turned net, or to the eptattiftrOf &nap Afton and reveled on the farm. 4),,a to the Ark of thefcmodes of en loping the tight.'he contended that.no cipriCs eel deuce Thad ,PoSipt k;ven to prove it, and it oaght nnt to be infetetl,tottufb S or 865 theitia had bees , hetehohelPf MAW oll‘ that the terVanestight,eit. tendealtoltrinany,for he might be a trefpJ.et Mos Pune of them. • Without pier trail Itarninifer dam of the:lumber slaimed r he infidel( that a claim of the' Mil fort timid brit 'he fuppotted. The right dittehnitnuil'he tlnt of: turning Orr 'tattle /room and ibb.Aaret tin she farro, vie. tot many as the farm couttintafiatuddy maititainc. lbw it appeared hears Ole evidence, that this right mold attach to silly aboudaiji the prefent occupation, fence nitttoare drat about Ito sir tsy aettli'hall been held by 11. e tenant-Aititilln*the Mete instil Gent's fathr was added to it. The queltion, therefore, firdie con ficleration of the Jury was, how many fitter could properly be. fopported bo a farm of lls acres in that-fituation, as for no more could, the oigto be thaintnltied? And it from their experience, or from tile telliniony fifths wittreites whom Ise &Mild till, they thoald determiso that trot ea Many as - 300 (beep could be kept co Likens of this,lia4 then they would Ore a veritftfor the Plaintiff, as the Defendant, in his plea, 'had claimed a right for 'zoo, 'cro or Soo heap, at tlx [tote tohua tired, *ad tot for any (Mailer number than Sea, and would therefore fail if hissight was itilablithed for anoz'aer number only. On the part of the plaintiff three witueftes were called; Who were farmers of confiderable experi ence, and who gave it as their opinion, that on a 4U111% of shoot tag acres of laud of tirailat quality with that of the Sprovallim {'arm, there could not foolscap be Maintained mettle than fix or [even (core of ,beep, and one of there witnefies laid, that in ilisopition, too would be a great number. Mr. Serjeant Sic Lou, ita *Leidy of fame length, contended, that he had fully proved the right of the Defendant not. merely as to the levancy And couchancv, but for a number greater than the at , Mott extent limited ii, the plea. It was not tie . • •W•farr; he maintained, to Thew the prroyeantriber nowingb ohs :rigid . vetendtd s t but he had air= , itioat coo, thd . footetiines yoa Auto had bellied. without intoruptims, and that a mono[ ter Introber Italbeen mal t % n inett await faro than the PitimilPastiteretres erivegt WW I - bit Of fittottotting. He observed, that in farms where the deptaltula ft of theep was made the prin . (goal objet, a much greater mambo, might's* maintained than . when that was not the cak t sad ' it was not proper that the right of the Deft:Waal fhould be Unwed by >r clitcretionzry calcalaio• founded on matter of uptition as to the autabta of Cheep which in prudence he ought to The Loco Cour Bator; aka rumbaed op the evidence to the Jury, cornmentiag on it at coa ti eralde length, and explaining to darts, OA* great rtertiNteaiq sod prettimet, the points of law *id' voilith the oieeftiOn was affetted.vmphst which the ,jury (which was fpecial) found a verdict for the Defendant, and confirmed his right decoding ino then), at fix (core to the hundred. BIRTH. I • Teltatiaremiut tit Right HAL Ley %Mot Imo. °La fao ? ax C?losnl &rules, Straorr-Lreta. _ . LAM TburYisy morning. PIM Asa hales Illentee. maid lasiliatt pia Sikora, EN. /if InkbiballieW, .01111cSte blineed for the bteseileeres •by bANIEL (4 CerOsbrarest.) et the *rim Pairriamp•OrmaAL t. Carry/Ana: sad pablithed by LEVEL 16) i,7, (4Cas terbertiele, latohali), it t. tetp-fttret, tell I t ST • I -Orrc a. Temple-N-0e *Ma Otke • I snaftwa• micas tot tic Earrot are rosuoita to be saleirollo‘ . Ault the torrent and ride out th known to theDifpofer ofallevents thofe dangers like men, ancl to de rd conilancy all the revered I ettiathers, all our neare and (let left tonftitution under Heaven, Vire kellgft 'which afforded us abd ha *Arafat of hippinefs " Efib; *Nth ht truffed, we 'Were rtrlh r Ittd to thake.-- , liis Loralhip foletrin appeal to the hearts and t hls bearers by raying, that It mul that that effort which we were to make, could never be fincefsl led the way. Supported by that the bleffing of HICA I VEN, We Mill \