Star. — London, England, 1801-12-03 00:00:00

who, for a eonilderable 1-nc,fth of time, t il l within thefe fix years, had been hi; - follower ; that he al ways undcrliood, and believed him to be a Man chetter man ; that he lodged at his houfe, the Pitt's Head, in the Old Bal, about two years ago ; that he was then in the leather butinels, in the fancy dying line ; that he alto law him about three or four months ago, in George-firm, Black friars-road ; that he treated him r. ith fomething to drink, he appearing to he very poor, and having a bundle of leather under his arm ; that he was by trade a hatter himfelf, but that he never knew nor believed the laid Jonathan Lees to be a hatter; that he had never fern the prifoner till lail fawns; that he never knew of any acquaintance between the prifoner and the laid Jonathan Lees; but that he believed, from a thorough acquaintance with his hand-writing, and manner of figning his name, which he had done in filling many bail bonds for him ; that the drawing and figning the Bill in elitellicm was the hand-writing of the laid Jona than Lees. _ . . Mr. plaice GROSE, in fumming np the evidence, obferved, that the prifoner could not be convkled of a forgery, unlefs it appeared to the Jury that he had himfelf drawn this bill, and made ufe of the narne of Jonathan Lees. If the bill was figned by this Jonathan Lees, although he was not a per fon of refponfibility, as the prifoner had hated, he was only gailty of a fraud. The Jury returned a verdiEt of Not Guilty of Forgery. It being, however, their opinion, that the prifoner was guilty of a grofs and atrocious fraud, it was recommended by the Court, that the profccutors fhunld prefer a new indk' h nent ac cordingly.—The prifoner was remanded. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, NOVEMBER 30. WALKER V THOMAS. The Plaintiff is an aullioneer, and has an auc tion-room in Dean.firtct, Soho, the bufinefs of which is aprarently carried on tinder the name of , who fells for the Plaintiff. A Gentleman of the name of Simpfon, having bought goods at the Plaintiff's anetion room, to the amount of 1061. 14s. paid down a depofit of 201. and gave a draft for the remainder on the Defendant, who is the mailer of George's Coffee- 1 houfe, which was regularly paid. It was alledged, on the part of the Plaintiff, that in the payment of this draft, a bank note for 301. had been given by the Defendant, which proved to be forged, and that, therefore, the Defendant l i not tracing it to any other perfon, was liable for the amount of the note. The note was traced and refpedively (worn to from the hands of Chriflopher Chriftie, who re ceived it from the Defendant, and paid it at the infiance of Mrs. Walker, in the ahfence of her huffitutd, the Plaintiff, to a publican in the neigh bourhood, of the name of Clarke, by whom it was paid to Mr. Arhouin, a brandy merchant, in Min cmg-lane, who fent it to Meas. Lees, and Co. Bankers,'by whom it was. aid to the Bank, where it was dir-overed to be a fr . rgery. Mr. one of the Infpedors of the Bank, proved the note to be forged, and that it was one amongC many which came from Hamburgh, but raid it was Icarcely poffible for any one except the Infpeetors of the Bank to be aware of the differ ence. He alfo laid that the Bank had formerly kept all notes Which were found to be forged, but that within fix months paft, they had stamped them as forged and tent them back. Chriltopher Chrillie, the fon of the perfon who rues for the Plaintiff, and who ads as the porter of the latter, (wore to receiving the note on the sth of May tali from the Defendant, and paying it on the fame day to Mr. Clarke. The latter made a memorandum at the time be received it, of the number and the ruin, and alfo the pet ion from whom he received it, and the thy when, which was the yth of May. He was its doubt, however, whether he had fet down the day cor redly, and was inclined to think it was either the 6th or 7th of May that he had reccircd it. The Defence fet up was, that the draft of Mr. Bimpfonmpon the Defendant, was not paid till the 6th of May, and that, therefore, the note in quer tion, which was (worn by Chriftopher Chriftie, to have been received on the gth May, could not have been received at the Defendant's houfe. It was (worn by Mr. Simplon, that 'he was acciden tally prefent at the Defendant's honfe, when hi: own draft was prefented for payment, and that it was on the 6th of May. Lord Aevani.av having fummed up the evi dence, obferved, it was clear there had not been two payments at the Defendant's houfe upon the draft of Mr Simpfon ; the only difficulty that had arifen was from the difference of date's. The Jury were to determine whether the evidence of Chrif topher Chriftie was entitled to credit, letting afide the miftake as to the teal date, and whether the note in queftitni was actually received by him frt,rn the Defendant —Verdid for Plaintiff for 3o'. be ing the amount of the note. SMITH 0. GAIIEGLII. Tb.: Plaintiff, who 13 a Taylor, brought this againfl the Defendant fur la ss. being :fie amr.iint of a bill for clitaths. Metter from the Deftn.la.it to that ilaintiff was produced, A %ling his h....unity at the moment to pay 6: de mand. The delivery 4.1. e c;nrids, the ametint, and the letter, were atimitied by the Defendant's Counfcl, wig, refilled t 1;,: on the prfittncl that the Plaintiff U.! ;wt.. J to give the Dcfi.ndant twelve miir.thc credit, and th it the firff item in the Plain tite, n:11 bei.rc .ated t::c ;.7.1 .kpril, Ift:4 4 he had aftion in Miclirchuas Term in thz f.,:0: ye it, us:A. h vi:birt the tw-Ave months, a..11:1:! , :fOre :t WAS 0,11[1:11JC61 he Wa. not entitled 1 , ow, r. • by the 1):::-,elant.'s brother, th:-.t tl., k nouloi:.e..l, that I.c had A L T tl, I:t t:-- 7 • • 1.141 d La% gouda. at tuelve i .. . e1...1rve..! •n :!,•• that all e , .111-! , ~• a. Sur ..:k: , I. 1:: I • ‘‘,:rt. :. :1 • '• .t , t t :•t:clant tv - '060% 1.441 &LC 11.4auti LaJ ;i4n.c4i W ;,,,:Ye hin twelve months credit, did away the etre& of parole evidence which had been given of the plain- tiff's having agreed to give that credit ? Vcrdil for the Defendant. COURT OF RING'S BENCH, NOV. 30. PERIN V. TRO*ARD. . . This was an action for work and labour. The Plaintiff was a Farmer, and the Defendant an opulent Solicitor, polfeffing eonliderable landed property at Sunbury, where the Plaintiff refid.fd. The Defendant employed the Plaintiff to plough up an Ozier Ayk in the Thames, for which labour he charged about 91. and which he fought, to re cover by the prefent atlion. The Defendant re filled this demand, on the ground that the charge was exorbitant ; and in luppot t of it called feveral witnelfes, who depofed, that they would have ploughed it at a much cheaper price. But as it appeared the work was attended with nnufual dif ficulty, from the ground being thick fet with Rumps of trees, by which it required a greater number of holies, and the relittance fo great that it even broke the coulter of the plough, the Jury thought that it merited more than the ufual price for ploughing, and returned a Vcrdiet for the whole of the Plaintiff's demand. DAWSON V. CILDIRT. This was an :talon to recover the amount of a bill for millinery articles furnilhed by the Plaintiff to the Defendant's Wife. Mr. MINGAY Rated, that the Defendant was an opulent Clergyman, and that his wife, from her rank and Ration in life, was entitled to wear the articles which his Client had furnithed her with, and confequently that the hulband was bound to pay for them. The d^livery of the goods being proved— Mr. ERSKINE, for the Defendant, admitted that a man was bound to pay for the drefs of his wife, 'provided it was fuel) as accorded with his rank and Ration. But he contended that his Client's wife had taken thofe articles which were far beyond her hufband's fphere, and that the Plaintiff ought not to have given her credit for them. He defcribed the Lady as in the wane of beauty, and the mo ther of level:11 children, but Ilia retaining the molt psflionate fondness for fplendor of drefs. The Defendant, who was a Clergyman, in eafy but not opulent eircumflances, A:illy palled part of the year in London, and had frequent oceafions I to regret his wife made that feafen an opportunity for gratifying er tafte at the expence of his more folid comforts. h He had paid the Plaintiff a bill of tol. and upon that occafion lb-jelly enjoined her not to give his wife any further•credit, bet to deal only for ready money. • Notwithftanding this caution, the Plaintiff again mulled her with ar ticles to the value of 171. and which this anion was brought to recover. Among other things he (fated, that after the Plaintiff' had received this caution, the tattled her daughter, who managed her bufinefs, to write to Mrs. Gildert, informing iher the was about to introduce a new fafhioned flaring hat, and hoping that (he would patronize it bv giving her an order for one. Mr. ERSKINE then proved the notice and the let ter by which the Plaintiff excited the Defendant's wife to run in debt with her, notwithftanding the Defendant's caution. • Lord lisa vox obferved, if the Plaintiff could recover her demar .1, after the had received the notice not to mil the Lady, there could be no do mettic fecutilv ; and a man could never guard Againfl the inclifcretions of his wife. It was clear that th•. hufband was bound to pay the debts of his ife, which were contraded for articles con fo :ant with her rank in life ; but it was never yet ,niagined, that if a. woman ailed indifcreetly, and her hutband cautioned a tradefman not to deal with her but for ready money, that after fuch caution he was bound to pay any debt The might contrail with that tradefman. His opinion was, that there was not the leaft foandation for the pre. fent aaion.—Verdid for the Defendant. SPFIiCtR V. HALL. This was an aelion for work and labour as an apothecary. The Defendant, it teemed, had be come a little too familiar with his maid fervant, the confequence was that the became pregnant.— In confequence of which the was removed to lodg ings at Newington, anal her mailer employed the Defendant to attend upon her during her lying in. Mary Loveday, the filler of the girl, was called, who proved the diratims from the Defendant to the Plaintiff, as alto that the Defendant paid for her lodging and her nurfc.—Verditl for the Plain tiff—>!l. is. 6d. f:UN V. WHITE. This was an a.ftion againft the Defendant for unfkilfoilly and negligently driving his chaife againft the Plaintiff's Te evidence Cited, that on the 23d of Ofloher lift, übout fix in the evening, the Plaintiff drove his chaife very rapidly down the City-road, on the wrong tide of it, where encountering the Plain tiff's horfe, the (haft went through part of his cheft, entering at the fhoulder bone and coming out near the fuddle pittc. The Defendant was alto, by the tellimony of one wits.cfs, very drunk. Se veral vritneffes were called on the other fide, who attempted to eflablifh, that the Defendant was going a moderate pace, and on the right fide of ;he road ; bet learnt any two of them agreed in crc faet.----Veretiet for Plaintiff for 14. GEORGE V. THE SHERIFF OE MIDDLESEX'. This was an Aftion brought for Pena Wet under the 'tatute for Extortion, of a Bailiff who had ar reffekT the Plaintiff in this iftion at the lint of ann. t!,cr fir t I. t6s. It was nominally brought againfl thc. Skrii, but in rcllit•• azainti the Sheriffs Of fic:t win, gave the Si a.t futurity for his conduit, as is altcars the ca:i•. It appeared that after the Plaintiff %vat arreftcd on a Satorday, he was conditeed, by his own tie ?ire, aveordim; to the pre,vifion of an At of Par . li.::::ent, to the Houfe of au Officer of the name of Evans, in Covent• Garden, and that he IV:ti there for Ow ; tl.a: he paid the &Alt j without any fitrther preeeedin;:s, and vet M r , (latcd, they contrived to ci..:rgc him, one r. a; t•T other, no lefs a film than 71. Os. SI a ruin ihOCMng to think of upon a C.:1); of iii. awl ibatiLing but the Proccf4 and Aura upon .it that could be legally demanded. This Action was therefore, -for the extortion which, he faid, was evident from this fum of money being paid on this occafion. It appealed that Evans was not the perfon to whom this Writ was direded ; that the Plaintiff lac brought only to his houfe as a Lock up-houfe ; and therefore it was contended by Mr. Gettow, that Evans was not here employed by the Sheriff in this particular aft, and that what• ever belonged to it, the Sheriff was not refponfible. Lord KENYON laid, he was forry there wars fuck a place as a Lock up-bottle, and he felt no difpolition to fcrecn any of thole who had the care of Inch honks, whenever They did that which was prolibitesl by the Law ; upon which foible& there well' many wholefome liatutes. He approved alfo of the doctrine by which the fliperior was anfwer able for the mifdeeds of his inferior in all cafes of this kind; the Sheriff was therefore terponfible for the condu& of his Bailiff, and it was well the Law was fo, otherwife the.. public would have but indifferent fecurity for indemnification againft op preffive ads. But then the Sheriff was only an. fwerable for the ads of his agents while they were aetin,.7 as fuch, the Sheriff would have been re fponfible to this Plaintiff, if the man who arreffed him had ailed in any way improperly, becaufe, in arrefting the Plaintiff, he ailed as the agent of the Sheriff ; bnt the man who took him into the Lock-' up-houfe, was not, in that refped, ailing as the 1 agent of the Sheriff. If there was any complaint I in that refped, it muff be made trr,ainfl. the Bailiff i bimfclf, who took the money, for in fo doing he Was aging for himfelf ; and not againft the Sheriff, for, in that particular, he was not ailing in the bu fines of the Sheriff. Plaintiff nonfuited. DECSMIER 1,-SITTINGS AT UILDHAL L. L HOMAN V. SSILNA. We give the outlines of this cafe to !hew the propriety of the propofed method of paying the fearnen about to be dif:harged from the Royal Navy. In the month of September the Plaintiff, who is a common failor, arrived in the Thames from a long voyage. His wages amounted to 241. and this turn he lodged in the. hands of the Defen dant, the landlord of the houfe where be lodged. He had continued at this pity:tic 119ufe extialy thir teen days, when he defined Mr. Milne to give him an account of his money. Milne told him that every farthing of it was gone; the (mall form; h: had given him from day to day, together with his (core, amounted to 241. Homan, not thinking it poffible that he had been living at the rate of nearly two guineas a day, brought this ation to recover the balance lie fuppofed to he due to him. The Defendant paid into Court 51. and for fo much pleaded a tender. He allowed that he had received the 241. but contended that it had all been laid out for the Plaintiff's ufe. In fupport of this plea an account of Hornan's expences during the 13 days was produced, and witneffes were called, who fubaantiated almoa every item of it. It ap peared that during the whole time no perfon came into the houfe that the poor failor did not infra upon treating. The landlord reproved him for his extravagance, but he raid that ifbe did not get the liquor there be would ehbwhere. Oa one 'oc cation he got 204. from the Defendant, and re turned in lets than an hour completely pennylefs. The fervant who attended him he gratified one ' morning with ilts. and he often went down to the river and brought up vratermen to drink with him. Lord KENYON inclined to think that feveral of the charges ought to be difallowed ; but the Jury after remaining out about halt an hour, brOugin in a Verdia for the Wendt:mt. TURNER T. DUET. This was an aElion of trover to recover the va lue of a bill of exchange. The fa& that appeared in evidence were ihortry thefe :—Duff, an attorney, being employed for a gentleman of the name of Wood, and thinking that he had property of Wood's in his hands, drew a hill upon Wood in favour of Turner, to whom Wood was indebted. Wood refuting to accept the bill, Duff defired that it might be fent to him, and he would procure its acceptance. About the time he again received it, he difcovercd that he had made it without any confederation, as the property of Wood's which he held turned out to be very dining. He there fore refilled to give it hack. The Defendant's Connfel W. :d, that he could prove tLat Duff drew the Bill only upon the con dition that Wood accepted it, and that Wordf worth, the Plaintiff's agent, when he demanded hack the Bill, aid, tl:at he did not care, although it was thrown into the fire. But Lord Kertrox was clearly of opinion that this was no anfwer to the anion. The Bill having got into Turner's hands for a valuable confider.ttion, would Rand good againft the maker, who had no right to retain it. An offer was now made to de liver up the Bill, and it was flrenuoufly contended that in 'rover it it is always a fufficient fatisfAllion to deliver up the thing laid to be found And con verted. The Plaintiff's Ccunfel, however, maintained that he had a right to damages. The neceffary ceremonies of prole ling the Bill for non-accep. tance, &c. had been prevented from being gene through, and at any rate the Plaintiff wostld be unjualy driven to frefh litigation. If the Deren. that had any equity on his tide, ha might file his bill upon this judgment as well as upon another-- Verdi& for the Plaintiff —damages 471. BIRTIL On the aft inftant, or New 'Anon, near N•t+hury, tbir Lady of Anthony Bacon, Efq. nf a fan, twiny her loath fon. MARRIF.I). On the it 7th 1011. Thomas Kinnear, Ffq. of Kinlnch. to Mitt Thornton, youngeft dauzhti r of the late t .eoeste Thornton, i.fq of Nuthill. At Glendaruel Houle, on the relit MR. Carel° N-d Camp bell. late of the 79th Regiment, to Milt Mary A. Coughed, daughter of the late John Campbell, l)unlufkan. ' At Catterick, the Rev. John Fenton, of Neweai Stafford /tire, and Vicar of Norpenhow, Cumberland. to • it. Living- Italie, daughter of the late Ales/m.l,r Liviu?Stotae, ut Weil "parte? Houle, Stirlinglhlre, hart. On Thurf.lay left, In the mighbourhool of Buhr. Carain Mundy. of the King's own Dr.igu.ans, to the younged .I.wAter of the Lte lord Rodney. On sJturday, at Whltechapal Cburch, Ladle t YAI 01. On the 4ith ult the Rey William Coup!::. A. N. Viol- cr Cathara, ha the Ca•untyttNaortLaittbkillaw.:, :a Lido Stow, ct adtal, ear iftwick. . At I,onmevill-, near falaHow, CCortt Ertl 1`.1.: ter at Law, to Mitt Loneicht, .:......I!.tkr of bo Lunzu.:. o .lle, Efq. M. P. for Mallow. I.ately, the w.f.: of 1114 Re.. h.. Jona s 111. A. Rec., ingv, it. N.rtitamptonCrire, and after to q,e Rev'. N::. • gr., VI 71r oi ft. Mary's, Re:s.l:..g. Uu Tuefday laft, at Caillo is ti,.! • year of hi, age, the Rev. Brook .11:I.Jgcs, Rector of in the county of Etre'. At Siltafh, Cornwall, after a Bunt libel., Croad, Efy.Ca.tain in his Nfajefty's For t. At New llaih,, near r.dinbures, Sat, •...r r l . • tit `,; R ache! Dalrymplc, daughter of the Ilt.aatt...d. . r. pie, of HAles, Bart. l'hurrday foltright, in the 2.5r1. dui L.h aae, Galloway, late nacrelaac t in kal , s'atirgh, fon's Hof • ital. M Arbro.vh, the tsth init. Mr. John At Arturo 411, mir. Nkbo..a, LEASE oft HOUSE sad .tHeit'. CliAlt.lhße CRON TO 13r: SOLD BY AUCTICLN......Dy Air. bk.,/ On the Premirce, on Tuefilli. De L/ tiles 3, 1;31. +A o'elLnk, by or.ler of the ACIELocer of Mr. Jou:: lit L. •. , Car. u'r. cab r nod PrMtf. :ler, a BanLem , t, rrHE LEASE au cubit mitial ) otnri .f piny Feet Lo depth, Fife h.• a Ckle on each. with every vegt.i.ite end ow omit detirably Ltuatcd for any retell trade. in that capit..; reugbfarc Cbariag Crofs, N 0.7, oa the North SlLle,l...te t occupation of Mr. Brydon, at the nvalmatc annual re - tt I:. And a 'enavodent Houle, t, Wiltio'LeCourt, ealjeiret;, and let to a molt rcfpeetahic Tenint nt ItilL The i s tr•J!" . . $ en: held for as unexpired term of Sicteen immediate poir.fa ,, n may be hat!.. T o b e vieeeel, parintnre May he had as the !'read', ?^1 of thy AuCtioneer, Viltiers-lrett, Strand. itOeFORD MANOR. and IitiTATE, near DOP.CHETTTr.,' With Poffrillinti Immediately. . TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION-3Y MR. RAINF, On Friday the t ith December, at the kaio4ow in Cornhill, Len,ort, at Twelve o'Ciock, in (1,., ; A FREEHOLD ESTATE, (die Lind-1' on which is redeemed) conlliting of a v%ii rltir and rich Farm of Arable and Orasirg Land, contalti-g xas Acres; the whole of *Veit (except about to rtc:.i lie in the Coininon ileits of rhalgrorc) flirroneds n.i lent Farm-hods: ni.l Om-bnildines. In e n m o. ! , in the uccupoinis ache Proprietor totrether nth of ROFFOR I), ncal Rocked with Ovine; and le t C.eirtiy In much rite, mbw diftant about 4 Mesterei. 13elifun, Distchcflor, and Tofercsith, In the Ouunt7 of Oaten:, and about to bons Loruldh: Prinicd Partkulara inay . he had on the Pretnr tt of t'. Printer of the Oaf; trzt Paper t at the pri”ciral inns at t`.•.eaNnt mer.tioned Town.: of Mr. liolliker, Solteitor, Thaw; at ttt Rainbow; and of Mr.. 'Aline, Lana-Aura-a -Tor, ce, r i wic . ltrcet, BLJornfbury. London, whore a Platt may be rm. EXTENSIVE NAVE OF LEATHER, AND LET Or A VERY EXTENSIVE 'FAN AVORK. TO MS SOLO BY PUBLIC SOUP, On Thud, lay, the t7th of December, the whole &telt 0: Tanned Lcethcr, that belooge4 to the cicz‘sf.t.: Me r r and.Gcerge Gtin(ll...y, in that . Tannazzt in bloat, aid rcrt. titar Fitinbargh. HE STOCK conlifts of a large Q!ewity Crop lihko, Buts, Rork Hides, Urge lad trait!. URI Skint, Calf Skim, &c. The rump will becin at to o'clock, at the Tanntig.a of i,i...r, and will be continued there, and afterwards at Pottll. , ,El the conchilion oldie bk. The itock *Ube open tt , tifite , ^4 of intended porch?fers, airy time on 'rudder/ or %V.:dna:a men:ling the day of fa4c, rind porchafers will he required r. &pat as. 64 per pound 44 thdir refpeClive purchafis, at.; grant 13:11 for tbc remainder; payable in four months, u..t. fzcurity. That extenfire Tan work, St. Ant!, ony's-ftreen reard-hesil Leith, lately poffrifecl by the decoded Melt". Geo. tad Gt.... Orindlay, containing 67 Lapping Vat*: 76 Harmers; 13 I.2ikt ► of which eight have Brats Cocks; (even Stouts; eight Batt., four Limes, and two livater-Jsoles. Thtre arc two eXcell....t Pump-was far fupplying it with water: two drying Shade, ciontaitLng four Boon; two Cop-lotto, excellently adapted lt7 drying; two Bark-mills, one of wl.ieh is ..1 the new chart Lion; lix lark-lefts; four CciLars; a Sta:.,e and .tray-1o::: Counting-hook, de:. with other ae.:ornuattilatioor,wil for carrying On a very rxtenfivo trade. There 117.1 chef Onifelfed by tenants at the yearly raft of 11. is. had v fair Hauler occupied by she workmen, which may be edimatol r 61. yearly. A gn.,:at part of the above Ls quite row, and whole in excellent condition; and Croat Arourr.' , le frtosiirat at thc port of Leith, and the Iminrillmc vianity of the bomb-market, which is only t mile di ) lant, C , Ttirtte is " - tercet eb:ap, the convenience toe GI: is apparent. "Ls Tannage mai be catered to inzuredLit el y. . . Pa tartlwr Pa tic ulars I/ to M.lerb.tiibluo and 014'..32:, Writas to Cu Signct, F. WHEN Profeffronal Men of edneation.and rc fponfibility deviate from the geoetal Winn I'y the t: • leAian of a peculiar Branch, the fanzlios. of lung coancucd faccefs is the bell criterion of fuperfOrity. Eight years have I devoted my pm/trete the exclaim true. tent of THEM: DISORDERti, and the fuccefidel rciult 1 1 try pica gives me additional ardour to (Trek a. frr at I ssw able the ravages of thole complaiots which ace the moft ant in the catalngue of human infirmities. After Initiation Into every branch as an Army Surgeon,l formed a wills it an early peeled of Praflice to refeuc 06• als from the Ignorance of uoialucatotbiro, cc the *O 2ll l ' 34 ' wows precipitar.cy of general l'radttlancts. The THRh.E. thoOREISRS, so the MU are el. ' voted my attention, comprise every fortes of Vt.Nflla.:.. IA uIiCtION, whether of a recant, or long dor/o*r — 24 ' • All kinds of DELIII.IT . Y; 'whether wife* from tb' fiabll" Schoolboys, or the inJukcoee of nWetreage, and lattiy th.t sw.- rangeincid attic fyikm In Wodna whiskies called • NESS or STERILITY. Num roue tilfeartat axe the,reftatot Jporacre or Mac lo the trestmeat of a Range Conorrhea.SO4 irnot unfrequ'lllif ba' pr. , . that the feeds of Life are poltonci by tie haJeeretton of ..i unguarded boar. By a fuperiir method fuch complaunt rc cably cured, and even when others have tailed, I trail du: may prelims to toter a radical re.eftablifhnicnt. Few,howcver, arc the tato of complicated diftrafa in tkr dlfned• • compa red with the calamitous inpatient oild.ithvo -4 from indulgence Ma FOLMAR V VICE, or the prevaiwn 0.. •••• ties of a failauniable Life, accui-e Slut Rate of Debility whit! is the unavoidable eottfooence of Lich pernicious habits. Where the unhappy tottery brood, over his esifery.but ear , .ully cosierals btu miatortune. tt may he flame conflation bin, to know, that although it be an ohie:t of dat.ht oP ta • • minty with other Pew:idiom-I 1. the mama! o• hile 1114 by tbe gradtri I pre, , , ref. alien •te veei 1.7 nient of roy tatpai , nce. If the r.re.•.r - Sarin to r..•Juce ott...t.uout-t y MHI .Kt '", by et. early cou. - iter.oCtieti nr ii, . I inlyvi.l VAtte, (.. c.rrs 1.0 ercat diricuhic. %. ;II ...car But whore this pstitit.ney I Is for years es P. 1.4. a rrnivr &stemma is ihdifiAnfihty out•'.:a. 'vet ve tic fist.a',..int; ti and to rs-auitnatc the Coelthuti.S.l. MARRIED WOhIL:11. who have tour, horn ..V..envir:' theLy expretattin . . of a I aasq,:aav L. that la 3 • • infkance.. furls .let • .1 an: c" ably by The NECXECY veeet, ells -prat to wy umleetabOY.. , the (ttialibeumm w!Adi I have ytthetted ro flat, four I. Li& eat nut s'l , .tsattin,s, en 1 to coi-cid, net tale: Cu -1 C.l a• "salon is oven, th-. 1 Mr may b.. ear! . .i!tei ' nt by letters Inelnbri3 a ill nate) At ht. hustle. No. :), Ad-11;evt. tr,wd. trar ' l en l Ple•ffir• Tlsen• b an additional entnn,ln Witer-Rreet aa,J t 1 tuswic on .0.44 the M. A Mann o, 0... I'4ll 'e P• •- it tins-r•Ai NllOl4l Primed rnr the N.,. JOHN I I Vet. slre.ftrt. t at the F I AIL lb, v 601../llrrit• Pi - L'....rey-ttrect ; a 111 pit:4ollW 1.• I.F VII. • t. ?burs i.laec, lArtheth), at No s. U., • r•••1••••,t, '• • otoOt feu, Tiropleollar t. to Mat:. • all u • Avineri fat at Imre' are nalucet.l w is afLite&A Ma I HIS that STkv re wtslai ranorr bn), IA )11 WO idi It tin 1 GA xd till ibepra TW r tbe AG. Yo deed P In ' . EA 1.. 1 . ttc. 'MI .Ca I•Tb .'n oit , ;vrbi - Ma wk. L I • 1 • _ _ 71 ea [ruenellewet VI AT AND S InaG sad Re ea the Ditadiu. The each ; t m~kin Dotty ' print(%) Tievss pine GoLldi Rio. 41 Te i be hat- earth r Turn, factor, &Kai_ i i,.~ lle ildl. towi