Star. — London, England, 1818-03-09 00:00:00

. - • ! • ] . I . , ! . • For vexed street, the Zvi ° self, b ; I ceedin i to fon at thf " the 'nth I " the ' accuse • utmos 4- acts t I create very I MOM power deed, fickle the in wan fa had pi force 1 • lodgin , • street by he; I . the no most wept b to her discha i ned in ii. i the ki i : the m( the in( I means or frie therafk agaitill detain she se " Sun i those of nit, i rrocee wines nature 1 4 , the mi in reii do lest this h o hhsi. h f tii msow t u h hai a t, the o l i , ' .: and n I I)urin the M 1 Thep ! severs ' . . iutersi • , 1 1 * little I rna tle Peace wildui oote ti: the CI snore 1 1 ment, about ) Office I prison Miss I The I sion 01 ; i time,l and ac Capti i 1 1 that h shoal,: she w( i 1 ..' • i - : die, b • '1 ing tv by his 1 4 is a(i years • posses lo liimsel A gu.tge notr .; been c •% I . i . the be Tni It i ) 1 &tido Deare, übli( 1 • • . in par sugge will g Ro] i , noon, Brune . 1 1. , ). : 1 •. kervec he we siderc • ' the 11 1 , • the N I thelo l o g', y e , ,• fort's i . the n and f S.?Cte and and . I the h 1 . 1 . .. * 1 ' name he w • 1 I site t he ha de G and 1 (ions when cline , . 11 41 the c # three 1 Wab I A; ...... ' . .., 4 . t a ;. ,.. is ' . 1 , x *.... . 4 • .1 1 , 1 0 r DUBLLV, MARCH 4. MISS KELLY. For some days back several letters had been deli vered at Miss KELLY'S lodgings, in Westmorland street, bearing evident marks of a deranged mind ; the writer delivered those letters at the house him self, but not receiving any answer, he became ex ceedingly importunate, and made several attempts to force his way up stairs ; he made similar attempts at the Theatre to obtain a personal interview with " the idol of his soul !"—his epistles were renewed 'nth fresh vigour—but instead of breathing forth " the soft tale of love," he launched into invective— ' accused the Lady (who had never seen him) of the utmost inconstancy, and at length proceeded to such acts of rudeness, at Miss KELLY s lodgings, as to create considerable alarm in her mind, which was, very naturally, heightened by a recollection of the 'occurrence at Drury-lane Theatre. Love—" all powerful love," was not be easily subdued ; and, in deed, it cannot be imagined to what extent " the fickle god" might have carried his votary, but for the interposition of the Police. Their interference was fount absolutely necessary, for the Gentleman had proceeded to acts of violence, in endeavouring to force himself into the presence of Miss KELLY, at her lodgings. He was secured and conveyed to College street Police Office, where Miss KELLY, accompanied by her sister, and several highly respectable friends, she next day, (Thursday) attended. She appeared most seriously affected by the circumstance, and wept bitterly, while narrating the facts that had come to her knowledge. Mr. MAGRATII, in the correct discharge of his magisterial duties, carefully exami ned into all particulars, and treated the prisoner with the kindness of a friend, expostulated with him, in the most humane and tender manner, hut in vain ! the incoherency of his language, and his general de meanour, bespoke the maniac ! His name, residence, or friends, he would not disclose ; Miss KELLY was, therefore, reluctantly obliged to lodge informations against him, in order to Justify the Magistrates in detaining him, until his friends could be ascertained; she seemed much affected, but her observation— " Surely it cannot be my beauty that operates on those people," delivered in her own peculiar style ofnaivetc, cast a gleam of vis comica over the whole, proceeding. The witness declared—" That he had witnessed Miss KELLY'S performances, she pourtrayed nature, and depicted the passions more forcibly to the mind and soul than any other being he ever saw, in requital for which, he could not, in Iris conscience, do less than offer her his hand in marriage !" and in this he obstinately persisted ; not all the persuasions of the Magistrates and Gentlemen present, could get him to retract. " lie felt himself b-und to offer her his hand ; it was an act of justice to her great talents. It was honourable and consistent on his part, and it should be so ; it was the only object he had in view, and nothing on earth should dissuade him from it." During these ejaculations he went down on his knees; the Magistrates were almost at a loss how to proceed. The prisoner having got pen, ink, and paper, wrote several extraordinary effusions of love and madness, interspersed with Greek quotations, which not a little puzzled their Worships. The unfortunate Gen tleman was removed to a private apartment, and a Peace Officer appointed to attend him. Here the wildness of his imagination became unbounded. At one time he imagined himself a cat, and Maxursro, the Chief Peace Officer (than whom there is not a more resolute or proper man) going in at the mo ment, the prisoner commenced jumping and mewing about the room, in a manner so frightful, that the Officer made a precipitate retreat to the door. The prisoner had scarcely a moment of lucid interval.— Miss KELLY'S performance of Lcuisa, in the farce of ' The Deserter, appears to have made a deep impres sion on his mind. Atter remaining solitary for some time, he conceived himself to be Henry the De s erter, and addressed the individuals that went into him, as Captains of the Guard ; he observed he was aware that he was to be shot, and implored that Miss KELLY should not go to the KING for a pardon for him : as she would not take his hand he was determined to die, but he would die like a soldier! After remain ing two days in the Police Office, he was recognized by his friends and relatives, who are respectable. He is a Gentleman well known in this City, about fifty years of age; he had been in Trinity College, and possessed great literary attainments. He devoted himself particularly to the study of the Greek lan guage, and compiled a selection of Greek extracts now read in College. The unhappy Gentleman has been conveyed to an Asylum, where he will obtain the benefit of medical aid. ' THE ART OT PRESERVING THE SIGHT.—A new Edition of this useful little Treatise has lately ap peared. We recommend it to the attention of the Public in general, and those of studious professions in particular. The philanthropy of the Author has suggested many personal cautions, of which they will gladly avail themselves. ROBBERY AT BRUNET'S HOTEL.--SaHliday after noon, a young man, very genteelly dressed, entered Brunet's Hotel, Leicester-square ; and it was ob kerved lay Mr. Ditivet, the manager of the house, that he went up stairs very boldly ; it was therefore con sidere.i that he was going to some of the inmates in the Hotel. He entered a room where Count Ludorff, the Neapolitan Minister, was sitting, and on finding the Count in the room, he made a very polite apo logy, saying he had mistaken the room for Mr. De fort's. He proceeded from his Excellency's room to the room where his Lady, the Countess Luderff, was, and from the Countess's room to the room where the Secretary to the Austrian Ambassador was. He was, observed to go out of the house with a large bundle, and it not being known what he had been doing in the house, and that he had been inquiring for the name of a gentleman who did not lodge in the house, he was pursued, and overtaken in Lisle -street, oppo site to the New Jerusalem Chapel, and the bundle he had proved to be clothes belonging to M. Bourbon de Conti, whose room he had entered in his absence, and made off. He was detained, and Donaldson, the eoestable, sent for, who brought him to the Office, when he said his name was John Roberts. He de clined sesing who he was, or making any reply to tile charge. He had beer seen in the Hotel about three weeks ago, at . whirn time it was robbed.—He WEI coaktoitted for further vicamination. LAW EiT4.LIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, MARCH 7. HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS OF WALES V. LORD LIVERPOOL AND OTHERS. The SOLICITOR GENERAL moved the Court on be half of Count Munster, brother of her Royal High ness the Princess of Wales, and the Earl of Liver pool, who were the joint executors of the late Duke of Brunswick, that her Royal Highness might be or dered to produce and submit to the inspection of the defendants two promissory notes or instruments drawn in august, 1816, by the late Duke of Bruns wick, in favour of her Royal Highness, the one for the sum of fifteen thousand pounds sterling, and the other for the same sum of fifteen thousand pounds, payable in Louis d'ors. He founded his motion on the affidavit of Count Munster, stating, that her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales had filed her bill in this Court against him and the Earl of Liver pool, as executors of the Duke of Brunswick, to re cover the amount of the money contained in the in struments in question ; and further stating, that hav ing been called upon to put in his answer to thebill, he ceuld not safely do so, or prepare a defence to the suit of her Royal Highness, unless he had a previous inspection of the instruments alleged to have been given by the late Duke to her Royal Highness. The principle on which this application was made—by motion upon affidavits, rather than by a cross bill, for a discovery —was, that if the defendants filed a cross bill, they would, in the due and ordinary course of practice,. be compelled to put in their answers to the bill of her Royal Highness, before they could have the benefit of her Royal Highness' answer to their bill. Sir ARTHUR PIGOI T was on the same side, and insisted that in point of practice the motion tow sub mitted to the Court was one which ought to be en tertained. Sir SAMUEL Rostitiv, on the part of her Royal Highness, contended that no such motion as the pre sent one had ever been made in this Court with suc cess ; and he was well persuaded that no circam-11 stance but the dignity of the parties could ever have induced his Learned Friends to have risked such a motion. He was assured his Lordship would, in this case, divest his mind of every consideration founded upon the illustrious rank of the contending parties, and would decide upon the same f rinciples as if, instead of the plaintiff being her Rod al High ness the Princess of N 1 ales, she had been Sarah Smith, or any other obscure ilidividuaL His Learned Friends must have been aware, that where a defendant, in a suit of equity, wanted the inspection of a document, in order to enable him to put in his answer, and that such document was in the possession of the plain tiff, the uniform course was to file a cross bill, calling upon the plaintiff to produce it. His experience had not furnished him with an instance where a different mode of obtaining a sight of a document required by a defendant had been successfully resorted to, and if xich an application could prevail, it would be a vio latien of the established practice of the Court for , ages ; the precedent he considered would be danger ous in the extreme, and therefore he was well per suaded his Lordship would hesitate a long while be fore he gave it his sanction. After some further arguments had been heard on both sides, The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that he hoped in this case, as well as in every other, he should decide with strict and impartial justice. He had nothing to do with those who came into that Court but to con sider them as plaintiff and defendant. This was a bill filed by the Priacess of Wales against two persons who are executors of the Duke of Brunswick, and it was filed to obtain payment out of the assets of the Duke of Brunswick of two bills, which had been given by him to her Royal Highness. The defend ants stated they had been aivised that it was mate rial to them to insist on her Royal Highness's de mand being made out in the first instance by the production of the bills. He held it his duty to dis pense the same measure of justice as he should do between other parties. It was a case of very great importance with reference to the practice of the Court. He should say but little on the subject, be cause he did not intend to give his final judgment till a future day. Nis Lordship remarked, that in Courts of Law, it had been the practice for ages to insist on having a profert of a speciality, and here his Lordship alluded to cases in the time of Lord Mans field,and also quoted the opinion of the Learned Judge upon the subject, as founded upon what he conceived to have been the practice of Courts of Equity.— His Lordship, speaking with deference of such a man as Lord Mansfield, said he did not appear to him to have recollected what a Court of Equity would have done upon the questions to which he had referred; but his Lordship added, that the cases at law did not, as he apprehended, apply to the present case. The present case could be decided with reference only to the practice of that Court. There might be particu lar exceptions to general rules of practice, but then care must be taken that the Court should b e satisfied the exception did actually exist. It became him, therefore, with reference to all those rules by which the production of instruments was enforced, to recol lect what it was those rules required. The bill stated that a double security had been given for the sane sum. It would be necessary h&eafter, when the an swer was filed, to look at the bill, in order to see what the bill said ; but as the answer was not put, and as the defendants alleged they could not put it in without the previous production of the instru ments, he must look at the affidavit on which the pre sent mdtion was grounded, to see that it stated a case forming an exception to the general rule of practice. He should read the papers, and look at some of the notes he had taken as the argument had proceeded, and would deliver himself on this subject on Tuesday next. The Court was extremely crowded to-hear this motion. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MARCH 7. BROOKS V. S. J. ARNOLD, ESQ. This was an action far goods sold and delivered. Mr. MARRYATT stated the case to the Jury. The plaintiff, he said, was a timber merchant ; the defen dant was the proprietor of the English Opera House, and the present plaintiff's demand was for timber furnished for the building of that Theatre. It ap peared that, originally, Mr. Arnold's contract was with Messrs. Robinsons as builders ; and Messrs. Ro binson: contracted with others to supply them with the matedals which *ley wanted. The timberlloer'l chant with whom Mr. Robinson contracted for the timber was this plaintiff; and, up to a certain period of the work, namely, up to the month of March, 1816, Mr. Brooks supplied Robinson with timber, being paid for it by Mr. Yatman. At this time, 400 , ever, the payments ceasing to be regular, Mr. Brooks declined supplying any more to Mr. Robinson. He was applied to on the subject by Mr. Beasley, Mr. Arnold s surveyor, but still refused to supply any more umber on Mr. Robinson's account. He, how ever, consented to supply the timber which might be wanted on Mr. Arnold's credit ; and he did accord ingly supply the timber in future to Mr. Arnold, and the orders for all future supplies of timber were fur nished upon orders signed by Mr. Beasley ; and as Mr. Arnold had another account with Mr. Brooks, which he called his yearly account, to distinguish this ac count respecting the Theatre from the private ac count, Mr. Beasley's orders always specified that the supply was for the general account. The balance due to Mr. Brooks upon this general account was up wards of 4001. and to recover that sum the present action was brought. The defence to he set up was, that Mr. Arnold was no party to this second agree ment, and that he had already been charged the sum in question by Robinson's trustees. Mr. Beasley was examined.—He began to coun tersign Robinson's orders for timber in May, 1816. He was not authorized by Mr. Arnold to do it, but did it as general agent to Mr. Arnold. Ile did it because he saw that unless he adopted this course the Robinsons would not bz able to go on with the contract. He gave Brooks a verbal guarantee to this effect, that if, when the theatre was finished ; there should be nothing due to the Hohinsons, then Mr. Arnold would be answerable, and upon this agreement the plaintiff was to supply timber, and did supply it. Lord ELLExaonoucat.—.' Then the money was to come out of Arnold's pocket, although he might ap ply any sums which should become due to Robinson in the course of the work to that purpose ?" . _ Mr. SCARLET?.-" Yes, my bird :and I can prove under Mr. Brooks's own hand, that Mr. Arnold has paid to him above SOO/. which he ought otherwise to have paid to Robinson." Lca:cl ELLENEOROUGH held that this was a special contract. It now appeared that the final settlement between Brooks and Arnold must depend on the final settlement between Robinson and Arnold; that set tlement had not taken place. The contract was in definite; it was a foolish contract, but the plaintiff must abide by it.—Plaintiff nonsuited. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. A point was decided the other day in the Common , Pleas, which is of some interest to the public. A witness who bad been summoned on an arbitration refused to give evidence till he was paid his expenses, and then brought his action to recover the same. Mr. Justice PARK decided, that a witness coming from a distance was entitled to his expenses, though a witness within the bills of mortality was not ; but he must not refuse to give evidence after being sworn. HERTFORDSHIRE ASSIZES. A man named Benjamin Foster was indicted on a charge of murdering his wife, but the Grand Jury ignored the bill.—The fullowibg were the only cases worth mentioning : William Dyer, aged 18, late a desertt‘r from the Marine Depot at Chatham, wns indicted for a violent assault upon the person of Thomas Clarke, on the King's highway, and taking from his person a silver watch and 71. in Bank -notes, and other property, on' the 12th of September last, in the parish of Braughin. All that ingenious cross-examination could effect for the prisoner was done by Mr. ADOLPHUS. The prisoner strenuously denied his guilt, said he knew nothing of the prosecutor, and was a stranger ' to that part .of the country. Mr. Baron WOOD detailed the evidence to the Jury with the greatest minuteness and impartiality, and the Jury immediately found the prisoner Guilty— Death. He was left for execution. Edward Hooper, aged 24, was capitally indicted for breaking and entering the dwelling-house of John Edmunds, of Watford, in this county, on the night of the 9th of January last, and stealing therein one dozen and a half of razors, one dozen and a half of knives and forks, some scissors, a silver spoon, some] wearing apparel, and a quantity of gin and brandy. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty—Death, but recommended him to mercy. The Assizes finished on Saturday evening, when sentence of death was passed on— _ . _ Robert Ruskin, Richard Bradshaw, and Barnard Rodwell, for horse-stealing; William Fountain and Thomas Hat r, for sheep-stealing ; James Andrews, for house-breaking ; Ldward Harper, Joseph Milton, John Martin, John little, and William Edwards, for burglary ; and William Dyer, for highwarrobbery The culprits, with the exception of Dyer, seemed deeply affected. Dyer was told by Baron Woos not to entertain any hope of mercy in this world. OXFORDSHIRE ASSIZES. AUSTIN V. YORKE. An action was brought by a livery stable.keeper of Oxford, against the defendant, who is son of Colonel Yorke, to recover a bill ef IS/. the items of which were composed of the following charges : 81. for the purchase of a horse 21.45. for the keep of it ; and 21. f6s. for the hire of horses. Mr. JARVIS, Counsel for the defendant, contended, that the articles in question were not necessaries. The Learned Judge fully coincided in opinion with the defendant's Counsel, and most strongly recom mended the Jury to find a verdict for the defendant, which they did accordingly, without hesitation. Monday night, the house of Mr. Jackson, the sign of the London Bridge, Maze Pond, Southwark, was broke open, and property stolen, consisting of money, plate, linen, and liquor, to a considerable amount. Tuesday night the respective premises of Mr.l)l uce, Bermondsey -street, Mr. Cribb, South -street, Lam beth, Mr. Wallis, Snow's-fields, and Mr. Owen, Suf folk -street, St. George's-fields, shoemaker, were broke open. At the latter house the robbers effected an en trance by forcing down one of the shutters and break ing one of the windows. They conveyed away a quantity of shoes. The watchman observed the breach in the front of the house, and alarmed the family.— The robbers returned in about half an hour after wards, and is consequence if no measures having been taken to stop up the cavity, they again entered and stole another lot of shoes. Sixty pair of shoes were taken in the whole. CLERICAILLVTELLIGEAL CAMBRIDGE, MARCII s. Th• Chancellor's Quid Nledals for the be,: ; r. meal Learning among the coinmeticirg r. on Friday last adjudpd to Mr. Cu , “:a George Stainfurth, both of Trinity Coll,ye.— int dates, whose names ate muntitmed iu Oa: r.: r• r are considered by the clarinets to credit :—Malkin, Fisher, and Falk, yard, St. Join's.—The subject u: the the ensuing year is " Deborah " Mr. Ifri;ri Kirby, RA. of Clare-hull, wj low u( that society. OXFORD, NIARCII 7. Wednesday last the funowiLs Ge:..ittnen etre Degrees: MIMEOS OF Altl3l Robert Tnghtm, Esq. of Oriel Colleg-, Cr,lrd C Rev. Fran, is Etat, of St. John's Colkge Rev. Authony Charles Payler, of /ileac Rev. Charles Rh neowe, of Lincoln Con key. John kingdon, of Exeter College . BACNSLOO. Or as IF. Mr. Philip Buckley Edwards, of Maser ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTIONS Rey. P. Scott Flalier t M.A. to the vicarage of /).. A Dispensation has passed the Great Seal to Thomas Davis, Rector of St. Martin, Sa...c carage of Idmiston, Wilts. Rev. Dr. Andrew Bell has been notnina.ed Stall in Hereford Cathedral. n The Rev. Wm. Doncaster, B. Fellow • is presented to the rtctory of Winteils , ,r^e I.zskt T s Rev. T. Ashley, 11.1). 'Snake Fellow of B rum ," lege, and Chaplain to Lord Braybrooke, a, ter^ the Principal and Fellows of thAr Sxiet. , cur r• V 4 e; Shefford, Berks, vacant by the death of the lier.WW. Th e Areurleas of Dublin G to succeed to the Du et , Derry, name by the death of Dena Ilume. On Mardi Stb, at Melton Mowbray, Lady Di man, of a son. Saturdap•se'onight, at Oafotd, the Lady of .bt B e et Vans, of a SOD. MARRIED. Rev. J. Hammond, B.A. of Albury, Hem, to kid daughter of W. Hammond, Fail. of tt.tei...ssuart, • Rev. T. R. WaMe, of Wilby, &aulk, Ehzabett,;. daughter of the late J. Gimisigham, Esq. of W..lworh, Rev. T. Townsend, Rector of Aistkorp, Anne, third daughter of John Miines, Esc..4 :he Rev. R. Gunny, of Truro, to Miss Cortiik, of :tlarait A few days since, at Dorchester, Mr. Stitt, k, 3 . 14:4 to Miss Cox. The remains of the bridegroom's f,rzr . sz committed to the earth about 14 days preeious to its =a dining which space he paid his addresses to no lest:harm ladies, with the first of whom he had an Ltere...w oc of his late wife's funeral. Feb. 9, at Arbroath, George Dow, shoer, aker, Chapel, of that pLce. Thu bridegroom is o:.le the bride 63. This matches not more ren.viabie to: dispirity in the ages of the parties than for the jag, tesque and antiquated appearance of the ; .ht sed of considerable property, and there is little cliA.bt torch of Hymen has been kindled at thz altar of the doughty son of Crispin was influenced to pledge the lass, in order to obtain possession of the Let s nt V . k ' tt, ikz.4 vreld* DIED. Nov. 10, at Port Louis Magical, Mr. Arch. Ltat lag Lieutenant of the 1 haeton. Del:ember I, swidenly, of an apopkctic fit, or. hit pulp' the Isle of France to the Cape, Lie..t. John Jan. 27, at Baleloch, the Rev. Wm. Arbuckle, idi...stai parish of North Dist. Feb. 17, at Aberdeen, Lieutenant Richard Erg the ^Sd year of his are. Feb. 24, at Lincoln, aged 94, Mrs. Drake, relict of Jells William Drake, formerly Vicar of latworth. F.b. 25, after a few days illness, at Chatham Rarr:cls, 21, Mr. John Ferries Nichol, only ton of the last Nichol, Minister of the pariDh of iranf,rd, Nor h,o:terlut Feb. 25, Jane, wile of the Rev. Thomas Lump, 311zwa1 Rirriemuir. Feb. Y 5, at Maidstone, in her 68th year, Ilary, relict del bte Rev. George Smith, M.A. Rector of Patech.a, /fi. 'ulster of Market-street Chapel, Hertfordshire. Saturday senr.ight, Lady Calatrine Frances Fiddi. ter of the late Viscount Fielding. Saturday ee'nnight, Joseph Carter, M.D. Akecg S Apothecary to the Liverpool Dispensary The de Monday, at Chichester ' Mrs. J. E. Bayley Howard, in whose house she resided, so deeply alicci, it occasion..d her decease a few days after. Tuesday se'nuight, at Lough= ' Dorset, Mariar:t the infant daughter of Captain Ross, Monday last, Mr. Tyler, a respectable 4.9rn-fab ,. . in Essex. lie was taken ill the morning of tLe , in Loadon, and notwithstanding inunedi-te medical pirtd the same evening. At his house, Ely-place, Dublin, after abe dav't Charles Montague Ormsby, Bert. Counsel to the of the Irish Revenue. The Yid alt. at ILislar, near Gosport, W. R. LlWa! formerly a Captain in the West Kent 3fiatia, and in the ied regiment. His complaint was the gent ai1.... At ('ranbrook, in the 97th year of Ler age, Mn.s Ma widow. She was the oldest person in the nrighbovt nomitbstanding her extreme age, was in the corstat: walking a considerable distance Adult daily, a all wee. , year, and was confined but a few days previous to h , r Thursday, in the Borough, Southwark, Nary a poor Iriahwoinu, iq the 1041111 year of her see. We feel pleasure in publishing the tlUlorin as transmitted to us, is confirmation of a p.. which appeared in our Paper, relative to tl.l that general and dangerous complaint R a t TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAN. Su—Observing a paragraph its your Papa of an I lernia,performcd (ot a large size, by the • at Charlotte House, Great Charlotte.stredt, Black! , justice, Sir, to Messrs. COOPER and Co. I personal testimony. I laving been afflicted ror. • : and deemed incurable by eminent florgeona, I p affliction, expecting every hour to be my list I plied to the Medical Board, and have reason excellent Establishment, for although I ant m ' fectly cured in a few weeks, and now, thank t'• health.-1 think, Mr. Editor, all who know ow I ems have no other motive for this communion..', t: brierm—l am, Oir, your obedient Servant tIJI Dui rot anti o r Loodop-roml, St. Ceorgei October tat 7. AVERAGE PRICES of CO' the Ream received is the e Wheat Rye. Barley. I SS 2 . 1 SO 145 11 as in Ent , lind week eudir.g IData. I Lie s. d. 49 4 s. ;4 I The kretage Price of Sugar, from t 1 rctut.o teeth eodlag the 4th March, llis, is 16s. 'ord.?, 11111(11FIELD MARKET, 31.11:61 To sink the offal L-per gone .t z lb. .3s 6d to 1s act I Veal 6. t 16 6d to 6s 41( l'ork Beef Mutton .. , Hewes 1 88.--C.Jares 1 40--Shetp_ and 1:1111h, Hay... Clever, HAY AND STRAW lit:R 1.0.1.1) 4C4 to S 55 Straw AI 1 , ;, , ... sto6 No I Rowen . PRICE OF STOCK Reduced shut ON SATl'Hlrtl India Stu, k India Bonds :xi 1! Exch. Bills e2d.i I Dixie el-PI I I Cons. for Ac. 7.. Cou. 77ig 78 774 4 per Ct. shut Navy 10511 Long Anus. shut Bank Stock Lou. Tickets 12-1 MIG lI — WATER at LONDON BRIM; I: T 0.31 t Noruing Afternoon ruittut ,, 10 ----- LONDON Priuted and publiibLd I .y LOLL La. liacc, r icospL.--13r. C. I.t g ,r. ~`