Star. — London, England, 1818-02-06 00:00:00

„, cee ding.he considered altogether. sv:2:ous pr :e• r” mere was no example of papers being laid Sent. vote the House but with a view to some legislative u The propo sed inquiry too was announced tc ° l s l e re ti o use on the very 'first day of the Session, i n, irn- „s iate l y a fter a Speech from the Throne, which n si the House that tranquillity was restored to consul, and that nothing more was wanted to istail it than the vigilance of Magistrates. It clear these documents were not laud before the ,se with a view to any legal investigation. Theo what purpose were they produced, but to give a o f indemnity to Ministers ? 'They could not yen s, without some new proceeding , to have confi - e enough to ask for such a Bill. But let the Is e reoollect the language of the Noble Lord at time he askel for this measure. He told them it a most dreadful responsibility that Ministers e incurring, and now he sought to screen dumb a Bill of Indemnity. But an Inquiry must be t hat would give satisfaction to the country, and one so delusive as that now pro posed. Par it s ought to have been sitting in the Autumn, they might have inquired into theweal situa hn ofthe country at that time, and have decided La c there was no necessity for suspending any di the :sties of the people longer than November. Even September it was said and known that tranquillity so completely restored that it was not necessary have recourse to the ordinary forms of jastice, t they suffered November and December so pass, at the end of January they thought it necessary i nq uire whether those powers should be cla.sconti ', without giving Parliament an opportunity oft ig whether they might not long before have lispensed with. By this conduct they had in • - incurred a most awful responsibility ; and it F the utmost importance that an inquiry should lace into the real state of the country when that anion took place ; and whether they had not ac ipon false information, at the time when it was 'hat fifty thousand men were assembled in one and thirty thousand in another, to throw the country into a state of insufrcction. The ..'should recollect what responsibility they had erred towards their Constituents, and should see, • they wentinto the inquiry, what the real ob- Ministers was. But it was impossible that :ould have any other than to procure themselves of Indemnity. And was this Bill to be granted an inquiry of persons nominated by Ministers :Ives? On the present occasion, the Ministers slves were to be the Committee; but he would the Committee should have the sense of the ma of the House with them. It was a small num ' individuals that were accused, but they be a majority by having the nomination of the mime. The House would recollect, that in proceedings at Derby, nothing appeared ye s the origin of the conspiracy ; but on the con- Counsel for the prisoners made it appear an inquiry had been gone into, it would have tired that the whole disturbance had been occa. l aby the conduct of the informers and spies, thi , occasion, he must say, that he thought the ,s-General had done his duty much better to , Ministers than to the public, and if those sus is which were imputed to them (whether fairly t he would riot say), of encouraging those spies, have been cleared away, that would have been six to do it. What did the Right Honourable leman mean by saying, that what took place ae , precluded an inquiry into.those measures?— .:ere were disturbances in all parts of the country, would have shown the necessity of the measures were adopted. But the Right Honourable Gen , had never shewn that the suspension of the . Corpus Act was a remedy for the evil ; in it was impossible to shew this, for the evil, as been described, never did exist. The conspi was suppressed entirely, before it was necessary recourse to the administration of justice, so then, as usual on former occasions, the laws found su ffi cient to suppress all disa ffection.-- his own part he accused Ministers of nothing than employing persons of no character to go different parts of the country, not like those who about to propagate the Gospel, but who were .as of evil, going about to insinuate themselves the favour of the poor and distressed, at their )pt , and their looms, and encouraging their here were persons of consequence and con . ready to join them. Thus they acted, till could return and "state to the Ministers who to reward them, what good they had done.— ', hear.) It appeared to him that the proceed s of last Session were so important, that it was' issible for the Rouse to pass over them without se atonement to their constituents, or doing to take away the mischiefs that have ari cr might yet arise, from the suspension of the • Corpus Act. Great as the evils were to those __ who were dragged from their homes, loaded sh irons, and condemned to solitary imprisonment, . were not the most important part of the mea z There was a mischisf done to the Constitution, iich far outweighed all the great mass of sufferings :wined by individuals, by the powers entrusted to hands of Ministers, and which they have acted in the manner they have dose. Let the House re sect, that the Suspension of the Habeas Corpus tt must of necessity become fruitful of great evils times to come. Let them recollect hew eagerly ceders were looked for, and how new preceaents ays were made to go before any thing. What .ght have happened if Ministers had already been sossessionof such a precedent as this, if, when the disturbance or suspicion of disloyalty prevailed, I could have had recourse to it? ( Hear, hear.) was . therefore to b e considered what might hap in future times, when Ministers might wish to I their own powers, or the powers of the Crown, the present generation should have when in future times some Prince of the= Sck might think any advantage gained over people a matter of triumph, or that it would be :er to rank amongst the despots of Europe titan to in the hearts of his subjects; what, he said, :la be the consequence, if such a Prince should ' Ministers base enough to sanction his designs? Honourable and Learned Geatlerqap continscd argue that there had been no necessity for the that were adopted. It had been said by= cable Baronet that the writ- of Habeas Corpus as well be expunged altogether, hecanso it was dines wise& peci-le were d'atarbed and ~ c uareiy ~ed the 1 - 1 country', *ntain it tt clea them se with a what purp of iademni without ce enough oast reooliec , time he asl a most i n curring y a Bill of I that woul a one so del ent ought t hm they mil 'on of the cot .at there was 'berties of the September 'as co compli o have recom ut they sutfe d at the eni inqu;re wht withou' paginF wheti dispenser •,1 incurred ; the utr place int rpension toe , upon false I tl that fifty lace, and thi dole count ouse'shoulc tarred tow ore they v t of Mtnis .ey could hi Bill of Inde der an inqt mselves ? emselves wi y, the Com( ,rity of the I r of individ .me a majc ,ramittee. “ose proceed ting the 0 -y, the Cos if an inqi. 1! upired tha . 3aed by the a this occasi nomey-Gent rds 3liniste lior.s which : not he wou aid have be e time to do deman by preclu( there were would have hat were ado eman had n Corps • - it was i . had been di ..cy was cup o have realm at then. as are found se For his owi ' .are than et o different ent about tl .'nesters of e .:o the far( orkshops es that th+ deration re, ey could ere to re-xi fear, kear.l is of last 'possible 1 r g sow ething tc , cr augl aheas Co ri . .ns who iron:, 2se were n There fax 03% (stained by hands is the ma 4ect, that et must of times to c der.ts tR 'ways were ight have 1 Possession • disturb: ' could h was t h ere f • in future i ' crud their cr the pt y; when • Brunswicl people a er to rant t •gu in the *gilt be the • Ye Ministe Honour argue in; easures tha it onourable Ight as wel - •Y tin= sarZiiied, that it could -be , of , any 14vm - _ag, to Cr: community. When Governments were complained of, and disaffection, as - they called it, prevailed, be cause the people were disaffected towards their pro- ta biliot 1 124 , ial event instance-Q1 caws of this sort,' from may isiispendasu Masabors-.F ParAdasiSat.— been resorted, to in order to leases the influence of: It was the great boast of the- country, and the lii at Ministers, because it, was supposed voters would net' answer to bold reformers, that such recommenda• ions be under,the • as if the,/ hadsiveatheir I were sore to brie an operative influencs on the Lie. - - precedents i -- . . ....rt. He hoped the course haws: that ...unig would net be inconsistent with the ...Hof duty he took during the last Session. Ile ilairtied no credit for the good opinion either. of Mi dilaters, or for that of those who might be their :ac es:son. His pride was to be an independent man (a 1 ,100); not indifferent to the good opinion of so- Aty, or to that of the. Vex Popedi. Therearere many ..yrief oin which a Member of Parliament might evince leiselependfmce. He should consider every man so Itite aid not change from one side of the Hauge to the other for his own benefit. lie had sat in the House eleven years, and he could boldly say that he l bw! caper got any thing for any vote he hied ever ven ( 911Clei011, flfUlittli ). He said thus much for 'himself, because he undemood it had been stated by i person conuccted with the Treasury, that his rrascrt for opposing Ministers last Session was, that a diplo• matic friend of his had not been employed.—Cries rf Order, Order ! .• Mr. FORBES thought if any blame lay upon Mi nisters, relative to -the exercise of the extraordinary powers with which the House had invested them, it wit., in his judgment, for not applying them to the great causes of the evil—those persons, who at the anniversary dinners of elections and on ether public occasions, endeavovred to enrage by their .seditious harangues the public tranqaillity.- If such bad been the course- purraed, he was confident it would have t the approbation of the holies part of that House ond of the country (a Lange.) • The question was pat and carried, that the Pape:, on the table be referred to a Ceniniittee; as was als.. the questions that the Committee be one of Secrecy, and that it consist of ill Members. On the question that the Members be chosen by way of ballot, Mr. BROUGHAM did not wish to protract the debate, but merely to say why he could not give h.s consent to the mode of election by ballot. The Nob:e Lord would thus bring the House into a difficulty Which they could tot get out of—if the Noble. Lot i were to be ballotted, and a certain number were to -be of opinion that the Noble Lord was not the fittest person to sit on the Committee to decide on. his own particular case, particularly as to any action brought against him by those individuals, which, for any thing that might be known, might already be entered ors the record ? If any Member wished to pit the ques tion whether the Noble Lord should be a member of the Committee, what he desired to kno-.v was, how the sense of the House, could betaken on a name after the ballot had been gone through? Mr, CANNING was equally ahtious not to pro tract the debate ; but he saw no difficulty. as the name of the Noble Lord would not be found iu tie list that would be put on. the.table, unless by a ma jority of the House ; and. how a minority could turn sonnd the division of a majority, was what he could not comprehend. When he recollected that twirl mitten of this kind had been appointed in the same way ' ever 7 4 >cca3ioh, he thought-the argument v. i.s -that if one mode • more .calcoialed an hi.: ee same controul feedings, then was the tine that the people at large i votes in the House. He quoted some pree.._ in derived protection fremaliis important law, and not ; point, and concluded with repeating, that he eaw not in times of general tranquillity. Yet, as soon as those 1 the slightest reason for refusing to appoint the Corn ti rues arrive, and when it was necessary to give proofs' :settee by ballot. to all other nations of the superior' liberty we en- Mr. TIERNEY, in explanation, stated that all he joyed, it might be taken as a precedent, that in the meant in his allusion to the trials at Derby we: this, reign of Geo. 111. or rather of the Prince Regent, the that no part of the evidence addused upon those trials British Ministers furnished their successors with did by no means justify the Suspension of the Ha means for violating the Constitution. Thinking there- bees Corpus Act. fore, as he did, that the House owed to their consti- Sir W. BRROUGHS denied that the events th 4 tuents the duty of taking away the evil of this pro- had occurred since last &miens had-fully luetifieti ceeding as mach as they could, he should vote for an the measures that had been adopted: his opinion was inquiry of a different kind than that partial and de- directly the contrary. The Honourable and Learned lusive one which was now proposed, the only object Baronet. proceeded to review the• proceedings from of which was to pass a Bill of Indemnity for Ministers. the presentation of the first Report, ridiculing the Mr. PHILLIPS thought no measure could have statements it contained of the tremendous-operations the effect of producing disrespect so much as a par- in contemplation of a broken-down farmer, a half tial tribunal of this kind. This was not merely the starved apothecary, and two coblers. In the second case of Ministers, but that of the country at large ; Report, all the disaffection so peculiarly applied to it was the case of those districts where traitorous the capital was sunk, and it was specifically declared purposes had been carried on, as well as the case of that no connexion subsisted between the conspirators those persons who had been detained during the here and in the country. It had bee n said that five Supermen. He was of opinion, that much more thousand placards bad been posted up, inviting the effectual measures might have been taken than by people to rise and destroy the Government. tVas sending spies and i4:irmers about to delude an ig- there any attempt to.prove this on the trial of Wat norant and unfortunate people. If these persons had son? None. at all.—Now as to Eierby, his opinion been withdrawn instead of encouraged, a real ad- was directly contrary eo that Of the Roaourable lien vantage would have been derived. There was said tieman who spoke last. The civil magistrates were to be a connexion amongst insurgents in different perfectly competent to seize and comma the leaders, parts of the country ; but we had seen no such con- armed only with their ordinary powers. For the ph flexion proved, except the connexion amongst the tification of Government, he thoteeht some such eve. spies.. The Honourable Gentleman, alluding to the deice as that which the Hotefindiele Gentlemen incendiary projects in Lancashire, observed, that he thought improper ought to have been brought for believed he had traced that plot to its origin, and ward. The ground of defence Mae, th e. the rioters that it was owing to the spies and informers only; were out of bread; and the Learned Judge, in his and he had no doubt whatever, that this fact, as far charge, left it to the Joey to decide whether there was as it regarded Lancashire, could be proved. It was any particuhar object and concert amongst theme— almost similar to what took place in 1812, when If this connection . had been proved by the evidence spies and informers were paid by the Magistrates, ofthe informers, and that their object was general and the most dreadful confusion in consequence en- destruction, including the Constituent, couldee have sued—(hear, hear.)—All this. was fully proved in a been doubted that their conduct was hightreason ? It publication by Dr. Taylor, late of Bolton, and now of would have excluded the arguments of Counsel, as to Liverpool. When spies were thus encouraged, much their having no particular object in view, while it allowance °fig - Nino be made by Ministers as to the would have disclosed who were the real instigators. sources from which they drew their information.— One unhappy culprit bad dacha: ed expressly in his Individuals were pointed out as engaged in a horrible last mome as, that he imputed to Oliver the crime conspiracy unbeir.n Manchester, yet those who were he had co.nmitted. Then why not have produced stigmatized. as the leaders in such plots hal been him? It would have shewn that it was not for Be taken up, kept in confinement, and at last liberated neral purposes, but for a particular object that they without trial, although we were still told that such a had risen. But Minister saw they had no chance conspiracy did exist. But was it not likely that such but by shilling the scene to Manchester, after the men should be sent back with much more power to trial of Watson. How then would they answer to the do mischief than they had before, by being represen- public for discharging those men who had been ted as martyrs in the cause of liberty ? Instead of prisoned without any trial whatever, after charging 1 being surprised that the minds of poor people should them with going delibcraeely to work to overturn the, be in a state of agitation from the conduct of these Goveranient—thus committing an oisert-act of high spies, it was only surprising that much more mischief treason ? They had thus avowed, that none.of the did not ensue•; and when the facts came before the grounds contained in the Second Report were nuE- House, no doubt Gentlemen would be as much sur- cient to authorise the proceedings that had been prised at it as he was himself. They had only been adopted. As to the charge of disaffection, had not taught, when half-starving, to look up for relief. to the general feeling on a late melancholy event proved Parliamentary Reform ; and though it was. known that ' • never was a more general - 'to that there were between 800 and 900,000 men in this the. ' and -the alarming state in Lancashire and its neighbourhood, then so far from any serious project being discovered, As to 1. nothing of any consequence was found out. Now, n:: re e. supposing, instead of sending spiei and informers to 'th at the delude and deceive these poor people, they had sent a persons to reason with and console them, how diffe- Session. rent might have been the result ? But as no mis- tion of that part of the Aet of I.st Sessiorewhich chief did wile, it was a strong presumption that Go- related to the preventing of suspicious meetings, and vernmerit was in the wrong. which would expire in July? . 'lf not, he saw no Mr. worn thought it would have-been better if prospective measure thee toed hare in view but that ' all discussion had been postponed till the question of indemnity. The Noble Lord had said this night, had passed of referriy c Ze papers to a Committee ; in plain terms, that some abuses or violations of the but as so much had said, he owed it to the law had taken place. Then it amounted to this : that House and himself to declare, that his opinion of the Parliament haJconfided tothein extraordinary powers, propriety of the Suspension of the Habeas Corpus and they had even exceeded them, •by keeping her Act last year remained unchanged; that its necessity sons in jail, and then dismissingatem without any had been proved by the circumstances that had trans- trial. How were these nem to obtain - redress for the pired at the different trials, and that it was his firm injuries they had sustained, but by bringing actions? conviction that the country"hacl been rescued by it and yet they were to be deprived of all remedy by a from the greatest -dangers.--(Hear, hear, hear.)— Report from Members appointed by Ministers them- It had been said that Government might have pre- selves, and without an opportunity of being heard vented what happened by taking ordinary precau- by going 'before the Committee. In his eudgment. dons, and apprehending, under the ordinary powers, this was one of the most violent proceedings that the suspected leaders of the conspiraciesee-eMr. Tier- Parliament had - eeir recorded, and he entreated the ney here explained his precise words, which he con- House to pause before they put such powers into the ceived had been misapprehended by the Honourable hands of Ministers, 'by giving them the privilege of Gentleman.)—Was it, however, to be concluded, that the ballot. because these men were not brought to trial that no Sir JOHN SEBRIOHT declared, that after hay coaspiracy, had been going on 1 . - It was positively ing read and considered the Report of the Commit sworn at Derby, that those persons were fed with the tee, he thought the state of the country required that constant hope that assistance would arrive to them Act, strong as it certainly was ; and he was one of from different parts of the kingdom. (Hear, hear.)— those who *mild always be ready to strengthen the He believed this was not without foundation, and heeds of Goner:mem wheriever e le-was necessary to ,he also believed they would have proceeded to put &win conspirators of any deeetiPeoe. But he MURDER AND ROBBERY. more open action, if they had not been restrained I owed it he Wieser sled the sought to wa t t, thm on LIKIILICIt Jar. St.—Tuesday morminz, at three &neck, a by the measu re s which had taken place, and for 1 that oceatinn he was' grossle deceived. (Loud Cries party of m en, exceeding twenty, well armed, knocbed l e t e e which be had given his vote, though he was not I tyleizr, hear, would the Opposition Benches.) Perhaps &tor of Mr. hristopher Spading, a respectable hemebehler of a Member of the Committee. Indeed, in Yorkshire, i Gentlemen would not honour hint with cheers when th e villa g e of Patr.ick's Weil, is th" count y, limn a shot tiros* the hall door, and demanded a poor , esseser, who tad takes 4 it was known there was so armed b ody: prepared, !theLls ti zre that'it was not Ms intention to impute to hi, todzi ., tl there , in the rapacity of a schoolmaster. on retei,- . drawn out, and firing on the King's troops.--(lharei it any deception . Were the cheers mere loudly log no answer,. they violently broke in a window, ( m i tre d ,I„, Yet, although it may not have been brought home repeated/fern the Ministered! sidee But although he house, and rushed ta stain, at the head elf which they were most to indisiduals, the fact itself was quite clear. But' fully exonerated etifinistery flow- aft - suspicion of any end w ol ere tl k re ili v . an A d gr knoc eat k n ed um d be owt r o ,bin two ni cli se th er en ' *ho missed fire at them three tunes ; be thee then it was mid, why were the trials so conducted as intention to deceive, it di eo him, from I w i l' u y h roe . 7e r : t s h is e h b 3 e p . f ett f I not to shew the full extent of ehe conspiracy, by the any thing thaehed come tollileimmetedge, that the st see tk..i.,_ , w ar:i p h rb i e s : en : s u nd eti ea t t er h e c or r iil li n akr g ho t r o hie assistance, 5t1174 otte.r f exam:nation of the informers? He would answer, ordinary laws of the ementity tnVitnot -have. been them o n the head with a candlestick, andthen took bold cf aIF is that this was not the duty of the Crown Officers ;. su ffi cient to restore tranquillity: 7 .Ur took no thine . 'ci w s ki he ch he " ld 'lii6g 6263", In tI p l : their duty was to bring home treason, according to' to-himself for his vote ;- but in hisinierthle opitrioa-the. si:e= 4S teltk':he - I r sistanee r of the schoulthast tbe er frai lh -te r l th e m.. the proofs they had of its existence. Indeed he saw , events had not justified the messurerthat lhidetieen lon beilerne out of the- loby window, and If 0411 he T 7.4 ample reason why those persons should not have been ' resorted to. ( Hear, hear.) '•-:-: • • - • -- ' kilted. A% tbat time a ruffian And thsvnigli one or the a non , „ d kb...crone Tho had his back against at. lien father isei eg brought fcrward. Suppose Brendzeth, Turner, and! Mr. ELLISON contended. that no -one could ISt:- the*. oti dat fronttie s wane t n e e rt o c l et t . ll i fr e r e st b t e t e, ~,,, Ludlam, had been taken up after that meeting, wbeiti lien otherwise than that Drantlrcth , had had a gross '''' an t d ' ull ' s re lot.tte w d C l r :r. ' an st e l l e e," iron on the bead, after which. she crept behind tie house; ei e...d they arranged their operations. If the informere falsehood imepted on him, respecting Oliver, at the had been brought forward, it wesaid have been said, timeef hiseenation. That we were indanger be concealed herseif. H ex * te e em eiped flout a back *below with " You are spies; you w e r e p r eem i e at that meeting; !tacit° doubt; but, thank Gon, we had subdued it. oat , injury :, during this time timISI ftthet was sersouneee es hie you are not proper evideneat" Hs felt conviocad He iiould toe, from his own experience ai a hfagi- • 4° f ic he place w. d art ai rth at e beingceini elm le' .th 6 ; c c r e's .' :g e bl l s wer e elite the c g s c c...! Outrages. ]duty .4 je uen ut, ted oec , ankd, hands, the pl an aste d ri a z i : more :: wsu : te do w t d s oc L tbe f ew th w e gn s tie y .c t on h osn el i g l pihk4 r i! that if the th y c c se ou r r e d n not h la beca ve been convict ed fnm on b the rsak evt ing - . alie sixals` cou thiit insy, taa se r :sc h it ad e th been e pco e rle ismi to r o es e dencea e r c f e ectly true 'as it appeared to be, because •he thought that if Parliament . had not acted as they . weltering blood,they broke every ter attitle in the house , and wee t the e • would have been mistrusted. He theme hacidone, they would have been guilty of a dere- rah Th ey soon e ft 'rrtzujr ,sir dead, in which sate Is murder-41e cried for .rry arreell aa.he was able, but me fure thoeght great 'utility bad arks= from the Sea- lictioa of their duty, an d. if they could not make out rpliod, you Tana!, yon have kil Y Wther, and that ' cut ;a pension of the. Habeas Corpus Act, which emabled a good case, he wooed pledge himself re vote against his ,krad most violently, and left ' Government to text up persons, and not to release them. kle pretested against that sort: of ttla.spbee t' , ,..?!7 Ulna g y r d in the m . . The Dutton luxe not I ...L..a.AT C P UI tt .11 . am-. an. al o l t tAlli o <i f e li tt a p p aZett li t: h t 1, 1117. i . bl i ai r tw bi : them till the danger was over. Such precaution' mous and, seditious trash with which we eerie intnier ) e - 2 , ~..., : were wise, prudent, and justifiable. Ente rt aining the* dated,. and tee • ebjeet of which was w demora li ze. had roterAi, but owe 'escapee uneun. ' Mu °` opinion,. he saw no reason to rapette of the vote he the.countree . .1- - tiossepi.--This morning emir tone Mew* gat over tit! tree had given last yeses with respect to the paesent . Mr. S e tene„Lß'enesidered that the s, r eteit E i s e l e railing *front of Deni, Redden, 61.'1. howeeheorevelieshreew, qurtion, he saw no came to doubt of the propriety' from thilmeiroree settee:l the cenntisi is not due te I t e heleh rs t e ktu r be% ve,tle h s-wea s. eu s 4 ,ored semis , 'Yen Pamir, ‘. t. -. ‘ri w t h , kt ia -1 Z . h4 . re ,t.la y of emcee-ins 'br balke r as the nenebers would hie! 'Knitters. bet to the hint (.." the ne , -essity- of retrench - I r f.,„,f tre d hi, i n t o te r o, e f i , ' ; ~C l l ) 7 l 4 4" i tu. areseeted by a vett d tee M a m e k r e ee edinees . moist -..fieien eherleed eirieng-the last feensiou.rtctived 1 , and same shoes, sal aood Air decar.rcdi - ' , '"" C . .'"4 ~ as it was called, and the other ,from the Opposition, anJ ,they usually produced a wonderful coincidence.— Then, what did the argument CRON R), but that a de `bate might be raised on an individual name? Vi l.e ther this was an objection, he thought hardly wiz,: di inquiry. • After a few words from Mr,Bootasam . and Mr. .TFEausy, in explanation, the Hose evided,—For the Motion 'ln--Against it 29--Majneiariit faniur of the Ballot 73. Mr. SAVILLE gave flotilla, that en Taestki his should move for leave to bring in a very short rall,but one partiiukrly affeiting the Land..-d Interest, as its object Would he fo protect them against Tenants fearing Lands that have 1:11413 in their possession, without paring theirvent--Ationes!a. The following is the List of the Minority against the Nomination, by Ballot, of the Secret Committee: Babbington, T. Fellowes, Hon. N. Otd, Wea k Burroughs, Sir W. Faaakerly, J. N. Piggott, Sir A. Brtsugham, H. Ferr:sson, Sir FL C. Philips, GeOrge Burdett, Sir F. Harcourt, John. • Roman Sir S. Barnett, Jounce Herm, Sir R. Scudamoee, R. P. Brand, Hon. T. Latouehe, Colonel Simmons. Z. p. Browne, Dom. Macdonald, James &bright, Sit J. Calcraft, J. Methuen, P. - Tierney, At. Hn. C. Campbell, Hon. J. Nugent, Lord Waldtgreva,Hn...V. Douglas, Hon. F. Ossulstone, Lord Wood, Akhe rn i n . Folkestone, Ld.Vie. • Triisas—Hon. J. Abercroatby and R. Gordon. The Tellers made a mistake and returned 29 instead of 31. iat - there never nits a more general 'attachment to way ou ever 7 occasion, he thouilit,the argument v. ie House of Brunswick and the Constitution, than conclusive, .that if one mode wee snore scakiziai.e.l len prevailed amongs t people of every class id,- than another :to eater an inck_vidual'a valises* so an .s to the mode of balfot,. he denied that. it was nut 414ivi.41 12 4 POP4.•Witil.the vent* delicacy...to Ifv: re exceptionable than that by vote, and • :lessljngik s bellpt wok the-bot or only.w . ariairitich lat the ob)ect:of the Wigwam befdre then 4 14.0dPia *Wits AlbiNak4ll4ll4loolollllo iespagaber posthumous justificaitni Of The meisdriis'efths - last .wham these vote two lists iasireaktices.oa..alt- such ession. Did they mean to move for a continua- -occasions—the one issuing from the Treasem as it Il k! . V 1 , I 4 { ( • i & i 1 i 4., 1 4 1 ; , 1" Y k 1 4 : 1 1 . • I 1 ) 1, ? . , i ' i 1 ! A i i ; , 1 1, 1, i, .. P t : ,i) • • . I , • i t , ~ : i . .. 1 , I,