Star. — London, England, 1815-02-01 00:00:00

t e e ! enre of the propositiontthemselves s to their ap. Cpoet incompatibility with the it in otlereagh's letter ao the Ametan assurances Secretary Lord of State, proposing--this negotiation, and with the sn. e on assurances of the British plenipotentiaries them sews, to the undersigned at their first confereaces w ail them. The undersigned, in reference to an ob. serration of the British -Plenipotentiar i es, must be allowed to say, that the objects which the government of the United States had id view, have not bee n withheld. • • The subjects considered as suitable for discussion were fairly brought' forward in the confeertices of the at:i ult. and the tennis on which the •ttnitett Stags were willino to conclude the peace, were frankly and .:spressly declared in the note of the undersigned, dated the 2 4 th ultimo. I t had been condeatif hoiknd ni t hat the nature of those ters,olo ,evi dently'•titattied in a sincere spirit of conciliation, wonist•Osireitiduced Great Britain to adopt them as tritlatifisbf.alneatat ; and it is vith deep regret that elle Underpittsog y . they have rightly understood the rneaninktif thelast note of the British Plenipiittodaries t peel:olive that• they still insist on the exclu4vemliifarr o i on of the Lakes, and on a permanent lattinWhilead, pendent territory for the IndiatinAlfmdinprithin dowlinions of the United . The fitst demand is groundeltjaktill'ettnpissitibn,. that the American Cavemen& hike hattifintk'th by its proceedings towards Spain, by the acituisition.we Louisiana, by purchases of Indian hind's„ 'and by an avowed intention of pe r maneatly'anneitittg the Cx nadas to the United State:, a spirit of aggeandisemext, send conaitest, which justifies the demands of *. ex traordinary motices trout them, to provide for the security of the British Possessions in America. ai In the ohiervations which the undersigned felt it their duty to make on the new demands of the Bri tish Government, they confined their animadversions to the nature of the demands themselves; they did not seek her illustrations oh the policy of Great Bri. tain in her conduct, in various quarters of the globe, towards other nations, for she was not accountable to the United States. Yet the undersigned will say, that their Government has ever been ready to arrange in the most amicable manner with Spain, the ques tions respecting the boundaries of Louisiana and Fin. rides, and that of indemnities acknowledged by Spain due to American citizens. How the peaceable acqui sition of Louisiana, or the purchase of !Inds within the acknowledged terra( ry of the United States, both made by fair and volune,ry treaties for satisfactory eqUiValtnit) can be ascribed to a spirit of conquest dangerous to their neighbours, the undersigned are shoeether at a loss to understand. Nor has the con - quest of Canada, and its permanent annexation to the United States, been the declared object of their Go. ternment. From the commencement of the war to the present time, the American Government has been alWayi . .willitx, to make peace, without obtaining any eeasien of Cereitnry,. and on the stile condition that the twatitimionestions Might • be satisfactorily* at ranged. Such vta:a their diSpositicnein the month of July, 1812, *hen thbyinstructed Itte.liatasell to make the propo sal of:ap 4rmiStice . • itr tte month of October of the „.. • . _sante. year, .when it : Monroe - 'answered Admiral .Utiattao's proposals to the same effect ; in April, )I 4. alien insunetiopt act e' gni to•t how of the .unneiSeeited, alien at/Voided to treat lit:teitiCei utWer .theptit,Ossil; . and in 'dantraiy, I b I 4,..Wheit • the-i,, nstruelinnianider which the undersigned ire now Acting, wore pared. • • • The groposuion of the, . fltitislePliatipottntiaries . is, that irfk.ordewia Secure iharor.tierr of. Can ada - aga it's( ittactle„ , the:. United State's shonkil 'leave their cora witlatutalcfenee4and it .seems' to ire forgotten, that, . poeoption; and s the: pioltimrty -Of Ilteie.reseinteisagive.theieany adfrautage in that.quar tter, it is,halasiCed likiltegreatliiteience bitweeti the 4 niliorl etablisconents of the taro - n*ll6ns. . No slid ° 'it: l ' ll 4 4 ; o ,n of; Canada by .the ljnife6 Stites Codld to seek, _without leasiing on their. Atlaiiinshoies, mar cnialse eesan. : exPosed to thegreat saperitiritt• Of. the British force, a mass of Antes-kaki:property far more valuableihan Canada. In lier relative Superior force to that.Of ihelhiited Stitt* idevery ether quar ter, G:-eat Britain may Grid a pledge much more effi cacious Lr the safety qi a single vulnerable point, than in stipulatiens norioUs to the interests and de:. evading to the honour of America. The best security ler the pnssessions of both countries will, howeVer, b round in an equal and solid peace ; in a mutual respect for the rights of each other, and in the cut:i lation of a fri e ndly u n d e r s tanding between them.— ' l tileVe be any source of jealousy ire relation to Ca nada itself; it will be found to exist solely in the un du- ' iitterrereuce of traders and agents, which may be rcinort•d by proper restraints. 4 The only American forts on the Lakes known to !tare been at the commencement of the negocia s °T I held by British force are Michillimackinac and a t ' i4 Rara• As the United States w e re, at the . s same t tire-, in po ssess i on et A m h ersi b urg sa d the adjacent country, it is not perteived that themere oecupa • tion of eiose two forts could gilt any chkini 'td his itantiic * , lajesty to large ieia's of terri" Ftlf°4ll- ded upo n th e tight of conquest I awed the undersigned may be pamitted to: add, that eiret it chances of %vac Shou ld yield to the littishairm i agnomen' toy olsesus, e nte r sitcemots.other part! of the' territories' of the Uni ted events would not alter their views , with regard whops to the terms of peace to which they pies S tv awn their consent. Without recurring to eiam. from the RevolutionwtY . GovernMentO of France, or Of fortitude to • a more recent and illustrious triuttiph their own hi in adversity, they-have: been taught by ci pal etien would that the occupation of their princi %lure tUir sub " d produce no despondency, nor. In tinpisw. to die to the disnfembermeflt of their t Abandonment of any one of the tights which constituteapere of their nwoftelinde. I tZ i 'l c d : n • o c e e ' thi trhe . general i peOtione that it was colitis practice of eitjvilin'zeciPdtiniat6ioterbtotiCilnactu'dea6adllwiersthintlice wtreaty as called ' and to provide for their secitritre five in c l uestinn by the undersigned ; but according t o denied the right of Great Britain, to into in 19se principles and her own practiee t within t tr+owledge .h_ea ny ierrnasnerofwdilthe ull lnd ii i ea an sta tribe tes s , r a e p s ac id.: by hetself, to consider such tribes as to ',her wall not repeat treat for them with the United States. broaorb i for repeat the facts and arguments already t ' waelby them in support of this T osition; end w hich remain' u made by ' the . The observations - les -upon du *caw 'C, ~ or Grenvilkt. and thrit takettion. Vitt the United 11/States now. for the first lifitt, deny the absolitte in 'dependence of the Indian: tribes, and chins the ex clusive right of purchasing. their lands. require, how ever, some notice. If the United States had now asserted, that .the Indians within their boundaries, veltb have acknowledged the United . States as their only protectors, were their subjects, living only at pat:ranee on their lands, far from being the first in making that as:.-ertioN they would only have followed the exasuple of the principles uniformly and invaria bly asserted, in substance, and fr:quently avowed - in kspress terms, by the British Government itself . .— s,Wrat wit the atteanikg of all the colonial charters *finned by the British monarchy, front that of Vic i ia, by Eliz ibeth, to that of Georgia, by the ins . iate pre:ecessor of. the present king, if the In. . qs .were the sovereigns an d p ro p r i e to rs of the ils t bestowed by those charters t What was the Weaning of that article in the treaty of Utrecht, by •which,pre Five Nations were described in• terms as s Wee; to the dominion o f G reat B r i ta i n t QT th a t of I e treaty with th e Cherokees , by which it was de. t e l . alicrthat the' King of Gieat Britain granted them a epiivilere to live where they pleased. it those sub jects were indetendent sovereigns, and if these tenants itL the license of the British King, were the rightful lerds of the lands where he granted them permission itn Jive ? What was the meaning, of that proclama tion of his present Britannic Majesty, issued in 1763, jeelating all purchases of lands from the Indians null and void, unless made by treaties held under the sanction of Lis Majesty's Government, if the Indians had the right to sell their lands to whom they pleased? What was the meani ng o f b oun d ar y lines of Ameri can territories, in - all the treaties of Great Britain with other European Powers having American pos sessions, particularly in the treaty of 1763, by which she acquired film France the sovereignty and pus session of the Canad as—in her treaty of peace with the United States in.l7B3?—nay, what is the mean ing of the north western boundary line now proposed by the British Cjenmissioners themselves, if it is the riF,htful possession and sovereignty of independent Indians, of which these b o u n daries dispose Is it in deed necessary to ask, whether Great Britain ever has pertnitted, or would permit, any foreign nation, or without her consent, any of her subjects, to ac quire lands from the Indians, in the territories of the Hodson Bay C.impany or in Canada ? In formally protesting against this system, it is net against a no vel pretension of the American Government—it is against the most solemn acts of their own sovereigns, against the royal proclamations, charters, and trea ties of Great Britain for more than two centuries, Irons the first settlement of North America to the present day that the Ili itish Plenipotentiaries protest. Front the rigour of this system, however, as practised by Great Britain and all the other European powers in America, the humane and liberal policy of the United States has voluntarily relaxed. A celebrated writer on. the laws of nations, to whose authority Bri tish jurists have taken particular satisfaction in ap pealing, After, staung, in the most explicit manner, the legitimacy of colonial settlements in America, the exelthion of all rights of uncivilised Indian tribes, has taco occasion to praise the first settlers of New #.;ilgland, and the founder of Pennsylvania, in hiv ing purchased or the Indians the lands they recoil/14 to cultivate, notwitlistapdem their being furnisheal with a charter from their sovereign. It is this ex ample which the U.iited States, since they became by their independence the sovereigns of the territory, -have adopted and organized into a- political system. Under that system the Indians residing within the United States are so far independent, that they live under their twin customs, and not under the laws of the United Sratet ; that their rights upon the lands where they iiih.ii - ait r*.r hunt are secured to them by hdundAries deliaed in amicable treaties between the United States nod themselves; and that whenevtr those i)ountiari4s are varied, it is also by amicable and voluntary treaties by which they receive from the 'United States ample compensation for every right they have to the lands ceded by them. They are so lar dependent ,as riot to have the right to dis. pose of their lands to any private persons, nor to any power other than the United States, and to be under their protection alone, And not under that of any other power. Whether . called subjects, or by what.: ewer name designated, such is the relation betireesi, them and the United States. That reletionis-neither' asserted now for the first time, nor did it orginate with the treaty of Grenville. These principles have been uniformly recognized by the Indians themselves, not only by that treaty, hut is all the other previous as well as subsequent treaties between them and the United States. 0 TheXteaty of Grenville neither took from the Indians the light, whichthey had net, of selling lands within the jur4diction of the United States to foreign Governments or snhjecti,noeceded to them the'rigjit of exercising exclusive jurisdiction within the boun. 'dary line assigned.- It-was merely declaratory of this public law, in .rehstion to .the patties, fonoded ont principles previously and universally, ecoguised. It left to to the United. tates.the rights of exercising so vereigntye and of Sie iring soil, and bents no analogy 4, . to the proposition o Great Brit4in wbkli. require:the abandonment of both. The. British Plripbtentiaries, state in their last note, that Great Britain is ready to enter into the *lime engagement with respect to the Indiani living Within their - line of demarkation, as that Which is, proposed to the United States.. . . , 46 The undersigned will not dwell on the immense inequality of value bet Ween the two territgie‘which, under such an arrangOment, would be Assigned, by, each:nation, respectively, to the Indians. and• which alotie would make the-reciprocity merely nominal. The condition whicb woOld be thus imposed on Great Britain not to siequire'landi in CantAaa foga the In diana, would be productive of no . . advantage to the United States, and is, therefore, no equivalent for the sieriace required of them. They do not consider that it belongs to the United Statca, in any respect to in. terfere with the concerns of Great Britain iii.. her American possessions. or with her policy towards the Indians residing there ; and.they cannot consent to - any interference, on the part pl 9!eat. Britain, 'with 'their own concerns, and particularly . with the' Indians living within tbcir territories.. . 44 may be the interest of Great Bri ain : tpAithit her ot j rawle:theien.ct6o4ittlitiZrrtaiod,dal,e'twoetlsite. A ir . p por r• ' Eiviluesteprialeaubot4. toto i be for ever inhabited by scasterst‘tribet of hunters I but it.wooklintliet a a itai• itsjoalltak ifteVatediltatas to h me s line ton thrtsogh 41trir territory beyond' which their settlements should fur ever& precluded . from extending, thereby arresting the natural growth of their popui ain't arid strength t e licili g the dianti tubstantialty, by virtue of the prnposed gua rantee, under the rote! (inn of Great Britain, &Aim ing them to perpetual harbArism, and leaiing an ex tensive frontier for ever exposed to their savage in-. cursions." (To lc continued.) • IMPORTANT STAFE PAPER. THE CASE OF KING JOACHIM OF NAPLES. FROM 1 GE AUGSBURG OARRTTL, JAR so. MEMORIAL. (AS PURL I SULD IN TYE ALLGENIKINIC itrateNn.) Kinin. Ute. Y 7, isi4. " Before the prorogation of( tire British) Pai lia mem Mr. Whitbread introduced some discussions on the connections of England with Sicily and Naples, and there is no doubt of their being the subject of fresh debates when it opens again. For this,reason, and also for the better understanding of the future deci sion of the Vienna Congress on this subject, we think it of use to relate, from good sources of information, how Joachim, King of Naples, first formed his con nection with Austna, and through this with the bther Powers. " As early as March, 1813, King Joachim began his first negociations at Vienna, by his Minister the Duke of St. Angelo. He had been irritated by the well.known article in the which placed him below the Viceroy of Italy. These negisciations "did not proceed with any degree of activity, tillihe month of June, when the King of N :ales substituted for the Duke of St. Angelo, Prince Cariati, and Mr. Sche nina, Marqui.. of St. Elia. 44 At the rime that the Emperor of Austria was at Opotcchina and Gitschen in 13ohemia ' the negocia tions were again at a stand, and the Austrian Go vestment once suffered forty-six days to pass with out answering a line to the pressing representa tions of its Minister at the Court of Naples, Count Mier, or to the Notes of the two Ministers above. mentioned. At last, after Austria had decidedly joined the Allies, Prince Metternich gave Count Mier instructions in cyphers to conclude a treaty. These dispatches were delivered to the Neapolitan Plenipo , tentiaries, to send thefts by a courier of that nation; it being feared that an Austrian courier might be stopped by the French in the north of Italy. Mr. Cariati's courier passed, as had been agreed on, through Munich, to get there new passports. But Mr. De C irracciolo, the Neapolaan Minister at the Court of Bavaria, detained him sixteen hour: for his .own correspondence, so that he did not reach Naples till the 21 of August, where he misse.l King Joachim, who had left it on the M. .1 his Prince, who had been above a month without lieu's from Vienna, thought himself betrayed or neglected, and had taken the only step which was left him, that of throwing" himself into the arprs of the Emperor (f France. 4 , lie had received, a short time before, a letter ; from Napoleon, inviting him in very pressing terms to repair tp - hiar at 'his head quarters at Dresden ; 6 probably; ('said he) to celebrate the festival ail peace, rather than assist him it continuingahe war ; tuarhe hid the more need of his counsel and assistance, as the Viceroy was far from him, awl death had deprived him of two .faithful friends, nurse and B2ssicres. He Was sensible tie was in want of-peace, his army being; disorganized, the finances of France in a bad colds: tioo, and age, which had increased his corpulericy, rendering him less fit for war than he had beemPft.:, Scarcely had King Joachim arrived at - Dresden, w on of his Plenipotentiaries to Austrbi t who suspected 1 that the courier had been dulayed,*repaired to him I from Prague, to communicate lohififthitonients'ef ilea dispatch es sent to Count Mier. • The King s icrbe sum of their authenticity, demanded a copy. 44 It was sent him from Prague, and the Austrian Secretary of Legation, who.had accompanied Count Buena to Napoleon, had orders to decypher it to the King of Naples; but the Armistice' drawing to a close, the Secretary had, out of precaution, delivered' the Cypher to General Bubna, on his departwesitom Dresden, and thus the instruction remained hid in obscurity—a circumstance which gave rise to fresh Suspicions, and which only the mcst solemn assurances lafthe Neapolitan Plenipatentiary were able to dispel. [v. anen the King of Naples did not let his aroopsioin' the French army ; bat not being able himsel • to leave it, he remained with Napoleon till the battle of Leipsic. 44 On the 21st of October, King Joachim wrote to Bonaparte that he wits going to return to his elatni nions ; and he, in fact, set out on the same day.-- biapoleon, in his answer, made him some reproaches on this account, and Warned him at the same time , not to listen to an proposals on the parr of Austria. " On thellai.ia May there appeared at Naples in ordinance in favour of the English commerce. The King authorised Prince Cariati, whom the Aus. trian Cabinet bad commissioned to engage him to! / take part in.this war against France, to negociate for ahis purpose with the coalition. At the • sante time he sent the Marquis of St. Elia to Sicily to Lord W; ilreatintk, to enter into negoeiatieov with England; but this last. psis produced no effect. {Wile (bra was , passing, Prince tsletternich proposed to,King Joirrehig to negociate 4t the,sarne time w 0 Austria and gog. land, Lord Aberdeen having powers from his Cowl to this pur_p_ ose . While the nectstary idatrectionswire , giving at Naples to Prince Carlini, - Crittut Nuppag arrived at that city pa the.3oll:llec. 1813. :00 Ole 11th Jan.,10 . 14.. the 44%0 Naples .signed. by e the mediatiOn of °attire Supperpat Naples, a Treats of Alliance with Austria, •by which that Power guaran tees to King .Joachim tfie sovereignty of his kingdom, and proldseS him the same guarantee froni the other Powers, as well as Ferdinand the Fourth's renuncias. don of his Oghts to Naples. " The same. Treaty promisetto King Joachim an increase of territory sufficient to give e good military frontier to his kingdom. General NuPperg commu nicated this treaty *to Lord ; lifjlliant Bentinek,' teho repaired in persim to Natalliklind concluded there, February 3, 1814, an ai . ce with • the Duke de Gallo, Minis* for Foreign Affairs. This Cararen ticip ,stip e ulaates, that . hostilities shall cease b.:tavern Great Britain and' Naples, and that the commercial relations between the two States . and their sntiecta shall be mestablished. It was at the same time re- Wied; that the Gager:Us of the Austrian, „English, and Keg; . 144 *fillies sli4uld.form in concert a t plan • of , h . acct.tdibi to which their united tansies 'lliad lit 'ln Italy Thrtheiithe cause. On diskt3d Ti of imultiey. itiaehlns set et* loin hie inner deteihmenti•ot • which hid elre s telYiseguit siege of Civita Vecchia and the CestMof St. Angeln, and on the 7th .et February Gener tl 144eent cone' chided a Military convention with the Neapolitan General Leyron. 44 About the same time. the King of Nep'et was in. fawned by the Austrian Cabinet that it bad nil rati fied the Treaty concleided With him J ulnas yi 1, I fit 1., because Lord Castlereagh, after having deliberately etemined it, had merle with his '.ti n hand ch inges and additions. that the Engil di Government final t make no &Acuity ;three xereeing to it. The stih stance of these changes was, I st. Joachim was to re nounce all his pretensions to Sicily, and co-operate in securing to the reigning Dynasty the pesses.irsn of that country, and iu procurina it an indemnity for the kingdom of Waoles, 2J. That the augmentation f territory for N sides was to be reetileted for a pornil.i. tiers of 400,000 persons, and he taken from the Rv man States. The Aristri in Cabinet tutlier l,r, d on this occasion to that of Naples, that these ch Inv s were to be discussed in -concert with the Min:sters of Russia and Prussia, and that all w,.re agreed, that if King Joachim suh=crib , d to diem, all .the Cehinets would accede to the Treaty by particular Cenventions. 46 This declaration was confirmed on the 10th of February by a note tram the A nv.ri in PLI, pnten tiary, as svc:l as by a diseatch from Lot al Castlereagh, to Lord William Beninck, tram I. isle, Jaen iry 22, which charged the latter to nit e all hoetilities cease, on the part of England against Myles, ant to take the most proper measures to indace the King ot Si. oily to do Ow same on his side. The King tit N pies adopted these modifications, and iminediwely fa, i the 'treaty, by a letter written with hi. own hand to the Emperor of Austria 'l'he rititication of thin last power did not take place till the ath of Much.— We. retrain from•all reflections on the campaign of the Austrian and Neapolitan artnies in Italy. 44 The two Armies, or nutter their Commanders, do not seem have had that reciprocal confidence which would have been necessary to act with success against the Viceroy of Italy, who, notwithstanding the inferiority of his numbers, defended himself for a long time tsith glory against the two others. We shall merely remark in general, that Naples brought into the field the 30,000 men stipulated by the Treaty, of which about 17,000 were detached in Tuscany, be fore Leghorn, Civita Vecchia, the Castle of Saint* Angelo and Ancona, and the 13,000 others acted on the l'o, and towards Parma and Placentia. 64 At the beginning of March, Lord W. Bentinck landed with an Anglo-Sicilian division near Leghorn, though it had been at first settled that this debarka- . lion was to take place near Genoa ; some days after wards Lord Bentinck repaired to keggio, the head wieners o! King Jaachim" and reeitired him to de• liver np Tuscany, and to make the Neapolitan troops evacuate it without delay, which the King refused-. Ist, Because Tuscany was- occupied by his troops merely to be restored to it• tightfill owner, the Arch duke Ferdinand. 2J. Beceosetlii: evepuation, with out any military purpose, eras ennira'ry to the dignity . and interest of 'Naples. 3d. It tense such a cession mug at least be the price of adefieitive treaty with England, which the King contintialle.proetaidasl -Ith, Because the troop., in Ttiscanylidil lit 'culated a Manifesto if their Goyceentent, to erdorte the pretensioni e f the old 'dynasty to Naplts. 66 The King offered ? natwithstanding,. og to .. give up to Lord Bentinek the command in Tuscany, pre. vided the Administrathin c,f the conntry . shoult be continued in t h e name of 'the King, and hii - 114 upon the foraressel." Lord `Bentinck on the other hand, that lie eonsidereil the 'refusal of the unconditional cession of Tuscany as In act of hos tility, and that he should act in consequence. He even spoke of raising the people of Tuscany ageing the • Neapolitan • army, and threatened a diversion against the .kingdom itselt ; so that the King began to be alarmed, and drew his troops nearer together, that he might in every case secure his retreat.* og During these discussions the Russian Genetal Balaschoff came to KiugJoathim, and brought hint a:letter in Alexander's ~own hand-writing, which stated, that 44 the Emperor renewed with pleasure theiriendly relations end the good nnderstanding;be , tween. the two powers, and approving of the princi' pies and the basis of the treaty•concluded between the Courts of Vienna and Naples, he had given to Ge neral Balaschoff the necessary full powers to- aig . treaty of alliance with the King.". It is said that this treaty was entirely drawn, and wanted but the signa tures, when news was received of the taking of Paris, and, at the same time of the proclamation of the Em peror of Russia, in which he declared that he would not treat either with Napoleon or with any member of his family. " General Balesehoff therefore hesitated to sign the Treaty at that time, and soon at mit that he left Italy. It is doubtful whether he left the Ressie n General Tuyler (now at Vienna) in a half official capacity with the King, or whether the General , re. manned at Naples till some weeks ago merely on his private-business; .In favour of King Junahim, 'it is further added— • 44 Ist, That England, after all that has happened, cannot act against him: without a breach of honoir. • 44 td. That Lord Castlereagh, as a testimorii of the best understending,had fsrmally promised to. the .Duc de Campochiare, and Prince Ceriati, 1.500 English muskets to arm the Neapolitan troops. -. Bdt That Lord Castlereagh had declared to thosstwo Ministers at Chaumont and at Dijon, that at there enisted•a treaty between England andehe King `ot• SicilA the fornier t power could not coaclude treaty with the King ef .14taples, before obtaining 'an: indemnity for ,King Ferdinand IV. but 'that the. King of Naples might depend upon the honour of 4n g lAnd, who, hayiag - en-operated in the en . gage. ;Deo, celleluded between Aosta t . and Naples as (eyed only nut of &Macy the conclusion of Traty of Peace with him ; that its case King Ferdinand did not renounce his right to Naples, and Would not ac cept an indemnity, England would not mak e w a r for him ;and lastly, theethe English Givernment would act'as mediator between the Courts of Naples% and ' • 66 Lord Bentinck received orders to repeat the same asturances to the'Cabitiet of Naples, and delivered to • NotaL-la * dispatch froth Lard Castlereagh to *Lora Wen, BeattheN,datedoDon, sd Apvii, 1814, th e farther Mt " of the VetielamtattOrs of the Prineepf §ielty to his troop at • and desirtss.hordllentleck to •eommtnikate to hint thlosiz h e bee taken to elisaenvk chip proosaling.in the named t* I Goimunasit. • . • • - . • • •