Star. — London, England, 1818-02-23 00:00:00

THEATRES. r,do'• TurAtax.—After the favourite Opera of ro rt ra ' ?mi. on Saturday night, the Ballet of r ' u le revived Printemp, composed by Mons. L;. n r was for the first time by Monsienr 1 ",., 2 1, the second Ballet Master to this Theatre. ll' „ff p r etty little allegory, in which the amo lil a -- ;r, or the western wind, is personified. On on of Spring, he enters, and seems to float in and kiss the various Bowers that are opening re f res hing breath. The Nymphs represent t t flowers--the rose, the lily, &c. and the incon zepkyr flies from Nymph to Nymph, till at , Cspid touches his heart, and he settles on the The lightness and brevity of the fable makes ~ .e ra Divertissement than a Ballet ; but its suc ;,,s unexampled, and the curtain fell amidst v osest narks of approbation we ever witnessed. g o ose exhibited a grand display of Fashionable& coronsGaitoss.—A new Opera, from the pen Mr .T. Dams, was performed on Saturday, for first ore, under the title of Zama ; or, the Tree Halth. leads of the p i e ce is founded on an interesting little story o dr ie de GENtst's Tales. Tho scene lies in and near Lima, es , ear Km, at which time the Peruvians began to meet j, f ro plans against their oppressors, the victorious Spaniards. carnal, and it was supposed the administration of slow •.. br the Indians, had made great ravages among the in . rho were daily falling victims, while the Indians were , 0 , 0 000 of a certain cure in the bark of the Quiagrissa, the which they kept secret from the Spaniards, whose angc ier beheld with sincere but suppressed satisfaction. Irden are resolved not to conununicate the knowledge * h a ir; virtues of this bark to their Spanish conquerors, is denounced against all the race of the traitor who betray the important secret. Origne, the Vice-Queen, be dangerously ill. Her Indian attendant Zorn is supposed Ore administered a slow poison to her mistress, and the sus is strengthened by what comes under the observation of who take upon themselves to watch over her conduct. She g leigth detected by the Viceroy, attempting secretly to intro. a rowder into the draught prepared for °ream, and on this roof of her guilt she is sentenced to the flames. Her husband,. gems, demands to share her fate, and both resolve to die in ante. They will not cadets guilt, and cannot prove their in- Knee to the Spaniards, without betraying the secret of the slims, in which case not only their own lives, but their only Ed will be sacrificed. At the moment the execution is to take ace, the ria-Qweess appears to intercede for the condemned, it the necessity of making an example of such offenders is its. ted upon. At this juncture news arrives that the Indians se resolved to communicate to the Spaniards the secret con tend with the Tree of Health. Proofs of the real character of it transactions for which Zama had been condemned to death ?now brought forward, and it is seen that, anxious for the ro. MIT of her mistress, she had mixed some of the healing bark seal of a slow consuming poison, as had been supposed. This own, it follows of course, that gratitude and rewards art mooed on those who had just been conducted to the fatal stake, pad of execution sad a dreadful death. Such is the outline of the principal business of this', ken, which, while it affords more gratification as ibrama than might have been expected from such *als, is a " vehicle for music" rises infinitely ve the ordinary average of merit. It would be cult to produce a better Opera from such a story. Ithrno inconsiderable share of interest, there is an . . Lacy of bustling . variety throughout ; and the 1 l egs charmingly set to music by BRAIIAN and Wior, were all rapturously applauded, and many fthem universally and justly encored. The Over lie by Mr. BISHOP, in which the plaintive, the lively, li solemn were united, served as a good prologue 1 the Opera, and called forth the strongest ex-, ons of universal admiration. The march 'and sof Indians, at the commencement of the first by Bless op, are very masterly in their design , Ml construction; an air, suns most sweetly by Miss ens, " No voice endearing," by the same com- E .H , was rapturously encored - . and a glee also by OP, in the first finale, perf ormed without any companiment, is a delightful specimen of this pe eliarly English kind d - composition. BRANUM% qs were nearly all encored ; the firsts beginning His dearest mother's joy," is beautiful, and will ma find its way all over the kingdom; and the Echo het, " Whither is he straying ?" is equally good : norm and bona are bewildered in a forest, Zunis ;pars and summons her husband by a sweet and gentle melody—it is answered from the depths of the cod—she follows the sound, and disappears ; Mir. la makes his way through the thicket, and calls on wife—she answers him from the distance, returns, - - they conclude the duet in the joy of mutual dis ery ; the effect of this was beautiful—Miss Sea ais and BRAHAM, by alternating their voices in distance, produced the variety of four—the me , y heard in its force in front of the stage, was re e2teti with deightful softness behind the scene, and ,e closing duet was a fine exertion of those powers cmbined, which singly had given so much play to he imagination—it is a fine composition.—But the ost stnking piece in this Opera, if it must so be de :urinated, is the " Parody," by BILAHAM, and sung , y him, which is an adaptation of the famous chan -sc, or Ilyinne de Marseillois, to words directly ap plicable to the present contest between'Spain and her American Colonies. The enthusiasm with which this vas s received is a p ower f u l d emonstrat i on o f t h e strong ling which the public entertain upon this subject ; te song was twice encored, and the theatre resound ed with the thunder of the plaudits. It is as follows : Peruvians, wake to glory ! Hark! what myriads bid ye rise! Tour children, wives, and grandsires hoary, Behold their tears, and hear their cries ! Shall fell invaders, mischief breeding, With Spanish lions, a ruffian band, Affright, and desolate the land, • Peace and Liberty lie bleeding ! To arms ! to arms! ye brave ! Dc avenging sword unsheath, March on! all hearts resolved (h Liberty, or Death ! Or Liberty ! can man resign thee, Otte having fait thy generous flame? C 2 T. Spanish bolts and bars confine thee, Or whips thy noble spirits tame? To% long Peru has wept bewailing, The savage power her conquerors wield, B.it Freedom is our sword and shield! all their arts are unavailing! Ts arms, &c. .T.7e general pe r f or m ance was extremely correct : k! 1 .. .),rtE, ABBOTT, FAWCETT, LISTON, and BLAN HARD, liot much occupied, yet made their parts cis: 61 y effective. I :.:!:cer.ery is very beautiful, and does infinite cre t: tc the artists, particularly the fore st scene , i n , h the Tree of Health stands in the centre, and 1 scent of the grand front of the Palace, which the most elegant things of the kind we have tier v.ithessed on any stage. The piece was given ( z . for . Tuesday next , b ut not w i t h out some slight ` . (7 4 1t.'-`a from a few fastidious half-price critics eat c LAW i?irti.LicEl4l&. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FEBRUARY TILE KING it.MILNE AND OTIIERS: This was an indictment preferred against Mr. Hus kisson, M.P. one of the Commissioners, Mr: Milne, the Surveyor, Mr. Nash, the builder, Mr. George Thompson, Mr. James Thompson, and Mr: Cornell, persons employed under the Act called the New Street Act, by Mr. Charles Pitt, of the Adelphi, for a conspiracy to injure him in his employ as Agent and Referee for persons seeking compensation under the Act for the loss sustained by them in being re moved from their habitations, situated in the line Of the proposed new street. The prosecutor pleaded his own cause, and ad dressed the Court in a speech of considerable length. George Brooks, Solicitor, employed witness to make a survey for him in 1816; witness had a tenant named Stephen Farr ; in April, 1815, Mr. Nash and Mr. Milne called on witness, and stated that they called on him, supposing he had some influence over his tenant Farr, and to desire he would exert his in fluence to induce Fart to take his business out of Pitt's hands, saying, if he could get rid of Farr's lease, there would be no difficulty in settling the compensation which witness was•to have for his inte rest. Witness, however, declined interfering. Cross-examined—Witness first knew Mr. Pitt by his coming to him as agent for Mr. Farr. Charles Rorke was in the habit of purchasing old houses in the line of the new street; recollects pur chasing some 'premises adjoining Mr. Sharpus's, in Market-street. Prosecutor came to witness whilst he was employed in pulling down these premises, to warn him that he was injuring Mr. Sharpus's pre mises, and advised him what he was to do for the safety of Mr. Sharpus. Witness had not spoken to prosecutor from that time till yesterday, when he met him by chance. In March, 1815, witness told George Thompson, the elder, and James Thompson, the younger, what prosecutor had said. They told him to go on, and not mind Mr. Pitt, as he was always busying himself with what did not concern him. Witness did not afterwards attend to what Mr. Pitt said. Sarah Gooch—Witness recollects the prosecutor., She applied to him for advice in 1815 respecting her property in Argyle-street. Prosecutor advised wit ness to apply to Mr. Milne to appoint a reference as to the value of her house. She accordingly went to Mr. Milne, and asked him how she was to proceed to get her claim settled ? Mr. Milne told her to choose a surveyor ; the witness asked if Mr. Mike had any choice ? Mr. Milne replied, not any, except Mr. Pitt. Mr. James Watkins—Witness, on the 3d Novem ber, 1815, appointed the prosecutor his referee. In a conversation which the witness afterwards had with Mr. Mike, that gentleman said, Mr. Montague would not meet Mr. Pitt. WilliaM Jarvis, Esq.—ln 1815, witness's father appointed Mr. Pitt his surveyor. Mr. Thompson said to witness, he was very sorry to hear it, as his father could not have put it in worse hands, as Pitt had rendered himself very obnoxious to the Com missioners. _ _ . Mr. John Pressland—Mr. Brooks employed the prosecutor as witness's surveyor at the desire of the witness. After Mr. Pitt was appointed, the witness , had some conversation with Mr. Cornell, one of the defendants. Cornell said witness had better have employed some other person, and witness believes he mentioned Mr. Montague. Witness knows Mr. Thompson, the elder, who said Mr. Nash did not like Mr. Pitt. _ _ Mr. Hargrave—Witness's father employed Mr. Pitt as his agent' and surveyor, respecting his pro perty in the line of the new street ; but in conse quence of what was said by Thompsons, the elder and younger, and Cornell, his father withdrew his employment from Mr. Pitt W. Tooke, Esq. Deptity High Bailiff of Westmin ster, recollects the questions of compensation which came before him relative to F. B. Fouche, on the 13th of September, 1816. Witness had no recollec tion of insinuations being thrown out against Mr. Pitt, of his having conspired with others to erect a Bazaar, for the purpose of defrauding the Commis sioners. Witness recollected the case of Mr. Wild ing. Mr. Pitt was not a witness on that occasion. He was alluded to ; but the Counsel employed with drew his allusion. Cross-examined—The trial of Fouche was for compensation for a house in Orford-street, valued at 10,0001. in consequence of its having been let for seven years as a Bazaar, at 999/. 10s. a-year. It was fitted up as a Bazaar in 1816, long after the Act was passed. The previous rent of the house was 751. and the taxes about 351. Mr. Pitt valued the house at 5,3001. It was a common shop in Oxford-street. The claim before the Jury was 10,1401. The person to whom ,the lease at 9991. 10s. was granted, was a person named Scroeder, who was pre viously clerk to Fouche. The Jury gave 1400/. Mr. Mayhew, another surveyor, valued it at 56001. but he valued it, as a bazaar, at a rent of 999 1 . 10s. The Commissioners offered 10501.; the Jury gave 14001. Mr. Harmer, another surveyor, said that, considered as a bazaar, he should value the premises at 4500/. The insinuation of the Counsel, that Mr. Pitt was concerned in the bazaar, was withdrawn as unfounded. Walker proved the having employed Pitt as his agent. Cornell called on witness, and said Mr. Pitt would lead him in the wrong, and Mr. Pitt had better take care of himself, or they would have nothing to do with him. The Right Honourable George Canning.—Witness received a letter from the prosecutor, dated May 9, 1817. Witness acknowledged the receipt of that let ter on the 22d of May, and stated in his reply, that he hail transmitted an extract of the prosecutor's let ter to Mr. Huskisson. Witness had no recollection of having spoken to the prosecutor in the lobby of the House of Commons, and recommended him to petition the Lords of the Treasury, but it was the an swer he would naturally have made, and probably did make, if the prosecutor applied to him. Sir Francis Burdett.—Witness was Chairman of the Committee of the House of Commons, to which the petitions of the inhabitants of Market-street and Norris -street, in the Haymarket, were referred. Lord Ettaxaonoucti observed, he cculd not hear what passed in the House of Commons. Prosecutor resumed his e.ramiration.—Witness re ceived several letters from the prosecutoor—CHere one did§ handed tip to Witness, gild he was asked who *as the individttal alluded to In that letter as having mentioned his (the prosectitor's) name 'The witness said, he could not recollect Who that In- dividual was. The prosecutor then proceeded to call several other witnesses, who stated, that they employed him as their agent, but in consequence of the delay which took place in having their business dose, They ulti mately took their papers out of his hands. Sir James Graham was next called.—Sir James stated, that Mr. MatheWs, an inhabitant of Market terrace, had applied to him to interest himself for him. Sir Jahies did so, and on inquiring into the [ compensation offered to Mr. Mathews, he considered it as most liberal, and strongly advise d Mr. Mathews to accept it. Mr. Mathews said he was ready to ac cept it, but his papers were in Mr. Pitt's hands, and be feared he should not be able to get them from hint. Sir James and several other Members of Par liament interested themselves for the persons seeking compensation, and in most instances their compensa tion was most liberal. He recollected having seen the prosecutor in the lobby of the House of Commons, and in answer to some questions put by Mr. Pitt to him, he recollected having said that some very exor bitant demands had been made by individuals, and that it was reported that Mr. Pitt advised these exor bitant demands. Mr. Pitt complained of injury he had received, and asked witness to speak to Mr.Hus kisson in his behalf. Witness declined. Mr. Pitt them observed, that he knew several of Mr. Huskis son's constituents. Sir James replied, " you had het ter apply to them." Mr. Pitt afterwards threatened to injure Sir James with his constituents. Mr. My Lord, I am sorry Sir James can not recollect something more; but I cannot force him to recollect what he has forgotten." Lord ELLENBOROUOII.—" Sir James recollects more than is for your advantage." The Honourable Mr. Bennet,l—Witness is Member , for Shrewsbury; knows the family of the Wildings very well ; they are tenants of the witness's father ; recollects speaking to Mr. Iluskisson on behalf of John Wilding, and his claims of compensation; Mr. Huskisson expressed a wish speedily to decide Wild ing's claim, either by reference or by trial; Mr. Hus kisson said, though he was most ready to consent to a reference, there was a person to whom he should object as a referee; and he at the same time assigned a reason which carried conviction to his mind as to the propriety of that objection. Witness afterwards met Mr. Pitt in'the street, and in a conversation with him, said he had found Mr. Huskisson most willing to settle the claim of John Wilding; witness had no recollection of having received a letter from Mr. Pitt, requesting that he would become referee between him and the Commissioners. Here the letter of Mr. Bennet, in answer to the letter in question, was han ded up to him. The Honourable Member read his letter, and said the application certainly had been made, but he declined becoming referee for Mr. Pitt. Lord Lauderdale had been on the bench in atten danie all day, subptened by the prosecutor, who at this period of the day (six o'clock) said, he should not examine his Lordship, nor would be detain him . - any longer. Mr. Phillips, a Clerk in the New-street Office, was next called.—He knew Mr. Pitt, and had seen him 'backwards and forwards at the Office for two years. The Difice was open to the aossits..saf all claimants, indiscriminately, with only one solitary instance: that instance was Mr. Pitt. The exception of Mr. Pitt arose from a transaction which took place in July, 1816. It was as follows :—A claim was sent inio the Office at that period an behalf of Mr. White, of the Haymarket, by Mr. Pitt, of 51000 guineas, as the price of his business, &c. It afterwards turned out that Mr. Flu was in contract for the business of Mr. White at that time, for a sum under 900 guineas, and at that sum the purchase was afterwards made 'of Mr. White. Upon this transaction it was that the Commissioners decided that they would at no future period treat with him as a referee. Mr. Vilette employed Mr. Pitt as his referee. Mr. F. Farquharson in June, 1816, had an inter view with Mr. Milne and Mr. Cornell relative to the purchase of Mr. White's house. Mr. Milne then said, that Mr. Pitt was called on to make the best etplana tion he could relative to this transaction. He declared he had no ill will towards Mr. Pitt, who was much deceived if he thought he, Mr. Milne, was his enemy. Witness also saw Mr. Hurkisson on the same subject, who declared he was no personal enemy to Mr. Pitt ; on the contrary, if Mr. Pitt could justify his conduct, he would do all in his power to forward 'his interest with the Board.—Here the prosecutor closed his case. Lord ELLENBOROUGII asked the Attorney General if he considered it necessary to address the Jury for the defendants on this evidence ? The ATTORNEY GeNERAL said he did not. Mr. Pitt stood to-day as a prosecutor, where he ought to have been upon his trial ; and who, having gone be fore a Grand Jury and given evidence to find a bill, then turned himself round, and taking the place of an advocate, availed himself of that situation to over turn all the laws of evidence, and to calumniate the characters of persons as honourable as ever existed, and whose only fault was, that they had treated him with too much lenity. Lord ELLENBOROUGH summed up, and the Jury immediately found the defendants—Not Guilty. ' The cause occupied the Court from nine in the ' morning till seven in the evening. OLD BAILEY. Saturday John Ward was indicted for forging a 51. note, with intent to defraud the Governor and Company of the Bank of England. The prisoner, in his defence, said he had received the 51. note from his master ; he never passed any of the other notes.—Mr. Justice HoLaoYD summed up the evidence, and the Jury, having retired for a quarter of an hour, returned a verdict, pronouncing the prisoner, Guilty, Death. bectaartruor.—Saturday last, Thomas Toping was charged at Union Hall with robbing Mr. Jones, of Long-lane, Bermondsey, an the highway. The prosecutor was returning home through Church-street, St. George's, on Friday night, when the prisoner came up, soliciting charity, and complaining of hunger and cold. ,Prosecutor took turn into a public-house, and refreshed him, when the prisoner said he must insist on seeing his benefactor home, as-many bad characters were abroad. When they had pro ceeded a little way, the prisoner took occasion to solicit the means of procuring a ►odging for the night, and as the prosecutor was pulling out sonic halfpence to give him, he knocked him down. Prosecutor bad, however, strength enough to seize the unvate 'ful wretch, whom he secured till the patrole and watchmen came up and cor.da;ted Lint W the watchhouse.-.-Committed for trial. Ekiictifibii 00 INAti§, kik THE OF HiS WIFE: In conseqttence of the eery ntimorbtiS tin Saturday last, by .persons of different rellgioli4. persuasions; to be admitted to Evans, in the hopes ig affording him some consolation in his MIAIvy si tuation, the Under-Sheriff went for the purpose of consulting the *ishes of the unfortunate than On that subject, when, after a short conversation, he declared his mind would be much disturbed by inch pro= ceedings, and that he only, wished to See the Rev; Mr. Cotton, Mr. Baker, Mt. Evan Evans, and his son, a lad about 19 years of age. The Under;Sheriff therefore gave positive orders, that no other persofi should have access to him. Yesterday„, at about two o'clock, the Rev. Mr. Cbtton administered the Sa crament to Evans, who was extremely penitent, and lamented that he should have suffered himself td be provoked to so rAsh. and cruel an act. Sbon after this the Under-Sheriff again visited hint, and found him much composed. He then informed him, that his son had arrived, and was waiting to see him, and he requested he might be admitted. A most distres sing but affectionate scene ensued, they rushed into each other's arms, and were for some minutes so ab sorbed in grief and tears as to prevent utterance.—; When they had recovered this first shock, Evans con versed rationally with his son, and impressing on his mind the awful situation in which he had placed him self by giving way to passion, warned him against the dreadful consequence of similar conduct; but when the time arrived for the departure of his son, Evans was much agonized at the separation. The unhappy man slept some few hours during the night ; and this morning, as the clock struck eight, he was exe cuted in the front of Newgate. The unfortunate sufferer conducted himself as a true penitent.—He was dressed the same as when he took his trial, except that of his great coat. He was cut down at • Rine o'clock, and taken away in a cart, followed by a small portion of those who had been awaiting, and carried to St. Bartholomew's Hospital for dissection. From accounts laid before the House of Commons, it appears that the total net Revenue of the Country, for the year ending sth Jan. 1817, was 61,755,1551.; and for the last year, ending sth January, 1818, 51,665,457/. A public Meeting is intended to beheld at the Crown and Anchor, to receive the Report of the Committee of the Society for the Suppression of Mendicity. It is gra tifying to hear that the attention of many Noblemen and Gentlemen of the highest respectability has ',teen called to this important subject. We have heard that his Rpyal Highness the Duke of YORK has been invited to take the chair on, the occasion; and we are persuaded that the Report will be found to be extremely interesting. His Grace the Duke of NORTHUMBERLAND has accepted the office of Presi dent ; and we hear, that among those Noblemen, who have manifested their desire to promote the ob ject of the Society by becoming Vice-Presidents, are to be found the Duke of Gammon, the Marquis of ANGLESEA, Lords SHEFFIELD GROSVENOR, HARD WICK, &c. & c. It will be a happy circumstance for -the Metropolis, if the exertions of the Committee of the Society should effect any considerable reduction of the number of bsggars which infest the streets. We lately notieeora ar case of Abduction in the neightdlnhood of Kilkenny, and stated that the parties had remained three nights at lodgings in that town. We have now to state that Miss HARRIET Mossou, the young Lady alluded to, was, on Sun day sennight, married to Mr. Wu. M. Da Moxruo agttcy, a young Gentleman residing a few miles from Kilkenny. Mr. B. FLOOD, the young Gentleman ac cused of carrying her off to that city, and appre hended at his lodgings, remains in prison to abide his trial. The extraordinary preference, which the Public have given to Witas's Offices, 9, Cornhill, and 17, Ludgate -street, - in the present Lottery, is easily ac counted for :—The Scheme contains THREE STER LING PRIZES of 90,0001. and CAPITALS of this de scription are seldom Sold any when else?. For in stance—the Lottery drawn in May, 1815, contained ONLY ONE. Prize of 30,000/. and THAT WAS SOLD BY WEBS ! The next Lottery, drawn in August; cowl tained ONLY ONE Prize of 30,0001. and THAT ALSO WAS SOLD VI WEBB ! The Lottery drawn in May, 1816, contained Two Prizes of 30,0001. and ONE of these WAS SOLD BY WEBB ! Thus it appears that, since May, 1815; there have been ONLY FOUR MONEY Prizes of 30,0001. and THREE or THEM Irani SOLD BY WEBB I Such plain and Sterling FASTS as these, will no doubt have more weight with the Public than any Purr. • Last week, being Candlemas fair week, at Dum fries, on Tuesday afternoon there appeared such a shew of superior horses, both for draught and saddle, as had not been remembered for many years. Buyers were shy—yet, on the whole, many purchases were made. On Wednesday morning a still greater number of fine horses appeared; the prices ar first exceeded those of some years past, but towards the.close of the day they rather declined, and many went off unsold. WINCWESTER, FEL 21.—We had very little busi ness done at our market to-day ; good articles only were in demand, for which rather more money was obtained.—Wheat, 725. to 78s. Barley, 38s. to 455. Oats, 28s. to 365. NEWPORT, ISLE or WIGHT, FEB. 20.—Wednesday, at our market, Wheat sold at 211. 17r. per load. CORN-EXCHANGE, MARR-LANE, FEBRUARY U. Although the supply of Wheat was small this morning, the trade was exceedingly heavy, at a de. dine of 2s. per quarter, upon all descriptions, arid only fine samples could be disposed of. Barley is full Is. per quarter lower, and dull sale at that re duction. Oats, Peas, and Beans are full Is. per quar ter cheaper, and very little demand for either. CURRENT TRICE. AS UNDER : ISIC USN. Small Beans 461 Wheat, Kest and Tick ditto 40s .411 s Essex 76s 92s Oats, Potatoe 32s 36s Suffolk Res 90s --... Poland 246 32. Norfolk 701 86s Feed les 2ts Rye Beery 44$ 4, flour, per Sack 751 80s Ms 495, Rapeseed, per Last £5B (60 Malt 60s 764 roa. White Peas 444 414 I ms Wisest, Dantzic Ms 1004 --- Boilers 30s 544 I Baltic Red, Hambro' or Grey Peas 42s 464 Bremen,Brabant red 664116, Hay L 4 Cm to SS 6.1 Straw ,C 1 les to L 2 12* Clovtl...- 301 to 6 10s I Rows 0 CCs to o Os .., , I , t 1 .r . ; 1 1. ~ 111! 1 I i .• t , ',1 . ,! 1 I I , 4 i k t ' . i il 4 1 4 i ', if ' 1 ) t . 0 , • , i , • 1 C:P , ~., t . .; .. . • . ; i 1 1 c 1 1 If , I A• ' e '..1 i i 1 1' 1 1 1 4 l' 1 : i • ;i4 v ,;. ! ii 1 ..,... 1 1 t, i 1 1 • , . 1 r , •.: t''', ' F.lfiv . 1,1 i 1 {I ' ' ' ill i ' l l l i i .., ,i ~ 4'; ~. , . 1 I ' . i . 4 ; 1 , ; 1 i I t . it \. , , t a ; , , 1 , r 1 t j , 1 -I ' ..f * 1 J . Si 'rye . ; . . . V • I '1:44 1 f Pi 4 ' t . , 4 ' , 1 ' • i 4 : 1 r I ' I . 1 i • ' 1 ' 1 i . t f I . . , i . 11 .. . " ' ' I ,•1 1 1 : I , I " • r f I ' 1 ; : ‘ 1 i ~ ,1 , ) I ' !V i 1 . I I