Star. — London, England, 1828-11-07 00:00:00

tHE ROMAN CATHOtIC QUE STION. , The following address from the pariah hf Wood-: boloogh, in the coulty of N .ttinglititn, has her I tor'. warded to th , Duke 01 NewcAsTrat, for gue.entation to' our gract , u S ereißii • TO TOP. KING. The tumble Petition of your Majesty's dutiful and loyal the Minister, Choral,/ erdetis, and principal Inhabitants of Woods uorough, in the county of Nottingham. " Showetb, " That your Majesty's petitioners see, with deep concern, the• endeavours of a portiuu of your Majesty's subjects earned, not merely to disturb the peace of your Majesty's reign, but absolutely et de troy the constitution under which this nation has flourished iser •ince your Majesty's family were called to the Throne. " The designs of a large portion of your Majesty's Homan Cabo :it subjects can no longer be mistaken. The liberality of our happy constitution protects every person in the free worship of Con ac tin ding to his conscience; but this security of Worship neither satisfies nor plea‘es the Rom in Catholics; it is evident that their ;im is to overturn the Protestant part of our constitution, and to raise their own Church in its stead ; hut your Majesty's Petitioners hope and trust that so long as the Throne is filled by one of the House of Brunswick, so long will these realms be blessed with a Protestant constitution; and your Majesty's Petitioners humbly tiolkit your Majesty to strengthen their confidence by refusing to sanction any further concession to the Roman Catholics; and your Majesty's Petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. s. Woodborough, October —, 1828." ARRANGEMENTb FOR LORD MAYORS' DAY. The procession this year, in addition to the usual somber of armed knights and their attendants, heralds, ancient banners, and other reminiscences of the 46 olden times," will be graced by the presence of the renowned personages, Gog and Magog, accurate counterparts of which, to admeasurement, have been for some weeks falnicating by Mr. Marriott, of Fleet•street. The effect two such Brobdignagian figures must have, in all re spects the site of the originals in Guildhall, may be conceived from stating that they exceed fourteen feet in height, and ate every way large in proportion. The feast will be on a scale of lib. rality, fully ade quate to any of late days; for which all the neces. saty arrangements are so far completed, that this pre sent evening (Friday) the Hall will be illuminated, and the general effect of the whole tried. All the monuH meats have been cleaned, and look as fresh as if from the chisel of the sculptor. The entice lower part of the Hall is hung round with scarlet drapery, elegantly festooned, and attached to wooden frame-work pre viously prepared. The raised part called the hust ings, imitative of the haul pas of our ancient baronial halls, will be carpetted, and the tables and railwork in and surrounding t decorated with scarlet drapery corresponding with the ether parts; besides which, the great tables h lot•, as well as that portion of the Hall in which they ate situated, will be tastefully orna mented ; and, to relieve the plainness of the walls above the-drapery, there will project from them large and richly . •pain e.tsiik banners of the City arms and achieve ments. At the back of the hustings, opposed to the giants at the other end, are three Gothic niches, which will contain t' e suits armour a orn in the procession, and give to this part a venerable and highly imposing sir of antiquity ; and in the centre above them, will be a superb transparency. Both the great s•ained glass windows will be illuminated, and the whole Hall lighted by glass chandeliers and numerous coloured lamps. DRURY-LANE THEATRE. Last evening, Mr. LIS EON commenced his engage meat at this Theatre for the present season, as So/us, in the Comedy of Every (hie has his Fault. He looked tind played with his usual drollery, and, if possible, se:th more than ordinary care and attention. His aspirations alter the felicities of a married hi- contra ted finely with the doubt and hesitation which the little aw kward ness ftnin time to time occurring between the wedded portion of the dramatis persona appeared to occasion in his mind on the subject. kis impossible to conceive any thing more ludictous than the process by which barns represents the old hachelor as screwing hi; courage up to' the perpet r ation of matrimony. JoNt.a%bir Rohn t Hamble is an admitable p ece of acting—the atone feeling of the part, concealed under the mask of fashionab'e beat tlessness and indifference, was very happily conveyed by the performer. Mr. FA RIME was the Harmony of the piece, and scattered oil on the troubled ways: ate and him with very excellent effect ; it was a delightful per formance. The Placid c f Mr. %towns was com mendably henpeck e d and insignificant. Lord !garland is a disagroc.ble character, and it was disagreeably played by Mr.YouNos. COOPER'S part, that of Captain Irwin, is one requiring guest delicacy and foibeatance in the performer ; it, was done full justice to last night. After all, it is a character alike distressing to the feelings vif actor and audience ; and we confess that the better and more naturally such things are played the less we like them. Another part w hich harrows up the feelings too much is that of Lady Pleanor Irwin.which was alloitedto Mrs. FAUCIT, and personated by her with much dis cretion. Placid's wife is one of those stage shrews in the perform-me of which Mrs. DAVISON is generally extremely happy. Her acting yesterday evening did not derogate Runt her previously acquired reputation in this way. Tf.e old maid of Mrs. C. JONES was, bating a little coarseness, very fair. Miss E. 'lnas play e.l delightfully as the deserted wife of the volatle Thimble. ...this young actress is nightly maiming in excellence, and grows proportionably in favour with the audience. On the whole the comedy was very well and strongly cast. All the performers, from Livros downward, to little Miss WILMOT (whose personation of the trilling part of Edward was excellent). exerted themselves to the utmost. Nevertheless tlw piece, which, with many capital strokes of nature and character, is, taking it al together, too lugubrious for a comedy, went off rather heavily. We learn by a letter from Messina, of the 15th ult. that the Christina, &diets frigate, arrived there from a cruise, with a small Tripolitan schooner, on the 9th • inst.; and the Isabella frigate, on the 10th, also with small Triplitan privateer. The Sirene frigate arlivei from a . <rvise on the llth. Ttle,Va l ere PARR. —A number of carpenters have beene . tetied since Tuesday in erecting • high paling, ;Morn e Basin in the Park, to prevent the men who are Clearing itef the mud from being obstructed in their labour by the public. Already several hundred loads f mud have been carried out of the reservoir, into an in. closed area, contiguous to the south east the of the Basin, where it had been deposited in large heaps, bin an immense quantity still remains to be removed. The gravel walks within the paling are now inaccessible to the pulite, and will remain so until the Basin is quite cleared and the improvements completed. Among the latter ? there is a banOsonie iron railing to be erected on the verge of the Reservoir, to prevent accidents, as the water_will buoy considerable depth; and as the gravel walkaatf feemented by the children of respect able families in the steighbourbood, they would, with out such protection, be constantly exposed to danger. The "my works will be considerably improved, and the eetaptso 4 .which will supply the Reservoir pith water Null in fume be a more striltios and inspasistabint 'sh i n it was forma ly• ( 1 01.1 t C OP CO.kINION COUNCIL. Yesterday a Court hi Common Cerhncil was held, for t' e purpose of t 'king into consideration theitepott upon the subject 1 , 1 the Office of SECONDARY. Vona the motion that the Report piesented on the last Court day be agreed to, Mr. LEGG moveJ an Amendment, that the olEce`of Secondary be nut sold. Mr. STEVENS supported the Amendment; as did alio Mr. G.4110a ay, Mr. flichnrd 'rapier, and ?Ir. Faye!). Mr. RICHARDSON, of Cripplegate, said, he thought the o►Ylce might be sold, as al:ether k was sold or given to some influential beggar, it could be subjected to die same regulations. 1-le understood that if they would give the appointment rf the Sherid's to Government, Government were willing to pay all the costs of the : prisons of the metropolis, which responsibility would: save the City 20,000!. a year—a matter of such para. mount importAnce, that whatever might be the oppo sition he should experience, he certainly would bring it forward upon a future day. An aJjournment of the question was then moved, but it was lost by 81 to Js—Majority 16. The Amendment, that the office should not be sold, was then carried by a very large majority. The LORD MAYOR Elect mentioned to the Court, on behalf of himself and the Sheriffs, that he had a request which he hoped would be complied with. They had found it impossible to accommodate the number of friends they wished to invite, and they therefore hoped that the &dugs up of Guildhall would be allowed to remain for some days, in order to afford time for a second entertainment. A motion to this effect was then put, and carried by Acclamation. Adjourned. THE COAL TRADE. Yesterday Mr. Hone and Sir Wm. De Crespigny weir occupied at Union-hall in hearing informations against persons belonging to the Coal Trade. The first itif mation was against Mr. Humphries, a coal merchant, residing in Christ Church, Surrey, who was charged with giving one of the labouring coal•meters 12s. by way of a fee for yielding to certain irregularities in the measurement of coals. John Stayers, a labewing coal-mater, stated, that on Monday, ch. 30. h of September, he was at th.• J smaica Wharf, and raw the defendant there, who put 12-. into his hand for yielding to different irregularities that had occurred at the wharf in the course of the work. After having received the money. the witness carried it to Mr. Turquand, the principal me:er, and mentinned to him what purpose it was presented t • him by the defend ant. When the defendant gave the mot.ey he remarked, " I give you this for Mr. Hale's , A ark." The money was given to him on M inday the 30th of September. —Ott referring to Cie Almanack, Mr. THLSSIGER dis covered that Monday was the 29th, instead tithe 30th, as averred in the information, and the Magistrates dis missed the into: mation on the above ground. Another information was then read, which charged the defendant with giving Stayers a sovereign on the 10th of October, under circumstances similar to those set forth in the foregoing informatiiin. Stayers stated, that on the 10th of October he saw the defendant at the Jamaica Wharf ; the defendant slipped a sovereign into his hand, saying, " take that, it's what I promised you for yourself." Witness subse quently gave the soyeresn to the principal coal meter, who had previously given him directions to take what ever money was dieted to him. Mr. Triissicaa cnntended that it was necessary to prove the wiuue•s had been actually on duty at the harf when he received the soveteign. Now it appeared tiat he had suit superintended at that wharf since the 3d of October. The Magistrates fired the defendant in the full pe. halt) of 101. and costs. . _ The defendant', Counsel gave notice of appeal. The next information was against Mr. Juhn Lovewell, a coal dealer, for giving George Wilco:, a labouring meter, the sum ol 2s ; 6J. over and above the usual al lowance to p.rsons in his situation. Wilco: stated that on the 4th of October he was sta. tinned at Mr. Somerville's wharf, at Vauxhall, and in the course of that day inspected a room of coals, which was sold by the defendant to a tientleman. After the nor k was done the defendant gave witness half-a-crown, sal ing, " that is for waking a long five." A " long five," ►was, the dealer taking some sacks out of the barge, and sending the rest to the purchaser. A Solicitor, who act nded for the defendant, stated that the witness ought not to have accei ted the bribe ; it was his duty, when offered to him, to have rejected it, and then no offence would have been committed.— In this instance the witness induces a party to commit an offence, and then turns round up. n him. Mr. HONE—It was at the suggestion of the principal meter, the brit .e was taken by his servant, in order to discover the impositions practised up( n the public. The Magistrates fined the defendant 1.51. and costs, which was paid, the defendant rennet king that he should not appeal against the conviction. Mr. Georg,. Manners, another coal-dealer, pleated guilty to an it formation exhibited against him for a similar offence, and was fined 51. and costs. Yesterday evening an Inquest was held at the Tik umphant Chariot, Pembroke Mews, Grosvenor-place, on the body of Elizabeth Ann Cature, aged 73. The deceased resided in Park-stieet, Grosvenor-square; she WAS in the act 1f stooping near the tile, when her clothe, caught fire, arid she was so dreadfully burnt that she died soon afterward;. Verdict--Acciaiental Death: COACH ACCIDENT.—About hall•patt seven o'clock nn nigl.t, the Fakenham coach, 4 1 Regulator," was overturned near Stansread, in E.sex, on its toad to town. There were twelve outside and four inside pas seizers, neither of whom received any serious injury. The r ins, it is said, broke, and the horses nut being under command, drew the coach iato one of the road side ditches, and, fortunately for those whose limbs aid lives were concerned, it fell upon a soft green sward which was beyond it. CORN-EXCHANGE, MARK-LANE, Nov. 7. The Oat Trade was rather brisk this morning, and Monday's prices fully supported. In Wheat and Marley there was but little doing; both article., however, supported Monday's prices. The duty which regulates the adrnistios of Foreign Wheat is now is,. Bd. and bad not some mistake occurred in the sulking of the Average last week, it would now be only los. Bd. IIitUSTATIONS 111111C1 MONDA 1% English qrs. Irish Foreign Flout Wheat 4,300 1,600 13 200 Barley 6,650 --. 2,160 IC,IOO seeks. Oats 7,700 6,630 3.'200 SMITHFIELD MARKET. Nov. 7. CATTLE AT MARKET. Beasts Mal Sbeep and Lambs 4,270 I Piss 120 I Calves 131 Beef . So to is Od I Veal . . 1s 6d to So sd blotto.% . 104 is. I.Pork_ . .54 Od as ed • Skillet' load, 4111 5 *Mu. Mitt an 10s to as 54 Od. Straw At 36 todit lab LAW INTELLIGENCE. • -Tao- . cotta OF Cll A NCI.: li V, W EST Al I NSTER, ' 141.:11.411LUA9 ?KIM. lii•;.g. 11E/OHE IHE Ll , ltit EH A.N . (1a.1011, Thursday, Novernber . 6—First day of Teriii—lltitiuot. 'Friday, November 7, and Sat•irelsy—? . ..ppedle. _ • . i tionday, November 10, a n d Tuesday—Moduli' as per List. 1 Wedne day, November 17Z-3lutiuns gent:rallr, if the List is disposed of. . . Thursday, November 13, Thursday, Vida), SatUiday, Monday,. and Tuesday.—Appeals. Wednesday, November 17—Motimis. . • .• . Thiasday, November 20, !.'rid.r... Seturddy, Nlanday, Tuesday, Wednesday. and Tbuteday—Appe.ds. Friday, November 28—Last uay of Term—Motions. lIFFoRE THE TICK•CHANCELLOR. Thursday, Novnaber 6—Nlotions. Friday, Novemb,a 7, Saturday, Monday, and T.tesday—Causes.' Wedatesalay, November 12—Pleas, Demurrer, Examinations, ind Further Directions. Thursday, November I:s—Causes. 'Friday. November 14—:Motions. Saturday, November 15. hitinday. and Tuesday—Causes. • ♦:'rduesday, November 19—Pleas, Demurrers, Examinations, and Further Direction,. Thursday, Ni..vember 20—Causes. Friday, November 21—Motions. Saturday, November '2. Monday, and Tuesday—Causes. Wednesday, November 26—Pleas, Demurrers. Examinations, and Further Directions. Thurstlii, November 2:—Short Catisis and Causes. Friday, November 23 Moticix. COURT OF COANCER7, Nu'f. 6. The Loam CHANCILLOR took his seat at hull-past one o'clock. accompanied by the Manna of the BULLS, VICK CHANCtLLOK, and Master WINGFIIILIS, BENCII V. EVANS. Mr. Honks was instructed to apply for an injunction in this case. The application had peen mad: during the vacation, without 'valve to the def Want; the Court thinking polite Ought to be given, r.:tused them the ap ~lication. Notice Had now been seprlatly setved, but the defendant did not appear. The facts of the case were portly these. The plaintiff was the ovine, of a ship called the Hat wry, w Lich in i 826 went from London to New V nob %Vales, and was to touch at various ports. The plaintiff had forme: I y been in the habit of accompanying he ship himself, hut upon the present occasion, in conse• (pence of ill health, he had appointed the delendant.who was neatly related to him, as the sup-: cargo. Upon the Lip arriving at Ply nu uth,the passenger- expressed their dissatisfaction at the conduct of Mt. Evans. A letter was then sent to the defendant by tl e plaintiff, request ing him to return, but this he refused to do. The ship teached her destination in safety. The defendant had eceived large sums of money on account of freight, and with this had bought goods. Upon the ship ar riving safe in Landon, in August last, t;ie defendant preceetle I to sell hart f the goods, and refused to account with the plaintiff fir the proceeds thereof, U, on this state of things the Learned Counsel asked the Court for an injunction to restrain the defendant from receiving the purchase money for the goods not yet paid for, and also to re,train him from selling the goods that were unsold.—His LORDSHIP granted the injunction. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Wi Nov. 6. This being the first day of Michaelmas Term. the Judge., %at. the exception of Mi. Justice HOLROYD, took their beats. The usual Report relating to the suitor the prisoners in the Pe.iiientiaiy, Millbsiik, was tried to the Judges by the officer. LORD STRANDS' RD. The SOLICITOR GENERAL applied for and obtained leave to file a criminal inter:nation against the Sun rewspapt r. for a libel on Lord Strangford, inserted in that paper r•.t the 7th et Augus. last. In reply to a que,tion titan Lord TIiNTERDRa I Ti.e SoLicrron GENERAL stst..l, that he had in his hand an affidavit of Lord Strang.ord, denying that any thing in his public or private conduct justified the re marks which constituted the libel. Lord TINTERDEN.—Take a rule to show cause. THE MAINR Of NEWBURY. Mr. GURNEY obtained a rule calling on Mr. Green, the Mayor of Newbury, to show cause why a writ of quo suarranio should not issue to asset fain by what autho rity be holds that office. The application was made on alleged irregularity in the election. • =LANE V. lIILCOAT. This was an action upon the provisions of the Turn. pike Act, which enacts that no 'Trustee of a Turnpike road shall enjoy any office o► place of profit. Tne de fendant, a Berkshire Magistrate, had held the office et Trustee of a Turnpike road, and through a Mr. Roberts, who acted as a clerk, filled the office of Treasurer. The' action was consequently brought against him to mover a penalty cf 501. given by the Act. A nonsuit having been entrred on the ground that the office of Treasurer was not an office of profit, Mr.T.s UNION this day moved t) set aside the nonsuit, and enter a verdict for the plaintiff.—The Court granted a rule ter show cause. ARLYR V. DRY. This was an action against die defendant, a Magi:. trate, for false imprisonment. It ss as tried before Mr. Justice .I:leis at Chester. A wot,uit was entered, on the groom.' that six months' notice of the action had not been given to the Magi,tia.e, according to tie Novi .sions of the 24th of George 111. The action was brought :►y the plaintiff, a silk w. aver, against the defendant tor committing him under the statute of the 4th of George IV. for one month, for bleach of cot:to act its not returning goods which I:e was employed to manufacture. Mr. JOHN WILLIAMS now moved for a tule to slims cause why the nonsuit should not be set a ide, and a trydict entered for the plain 4, on t: , e ground that proper notice had been given to the defendant. The imprisonment of the plaintiff termina•ed on the 14th 01 Dec, miser, and the 'sit was sued out on the 14th of June, and the question was whether the day on which the plaittiff was discharged *as to be considered as excluded from the calcula ion t f the six months ? 11 excluded. the notice was regular-41 incloclod, it was correct. He (Mr. J. William•) contended that the im pti•onment terminated on the 14th, and that the notice was good. The Couar granted a rule to show cause. IISHICE V. CLEMENT. This was an action t ied at Guildhall, before Lord TENTERDEN, for a libel published in Bell's Life in London, a Sunday Paper,. of which the defendant is Proprietor. It appeared that the plaintiff, who is an attorney in the country, brought an action against Stockdale, the bookseller. for some defamatory expres sions concerning the plaintiff's character, published in the scandalous work entitled Memoirs of Harriette Wilson. Some verses were subsequently published in the defendant's Paper, in allusion to that action, and in those verses the plaintiff's name was intro. uced in a manner, as he considered, calculated not only to bring ridicule on him), but to injure his character. The Jury, however. on the trial, returned a weir diet for defendant. Mr. CAUPBILL now moved to set aside the verdict, on the grounds of misdirection on the part of the Learned Judge, and the verdict being against the weight of eve. dente. He complained that the Lord Chief Ju.tice had left it In the Jul tehithct t is iglu:aim of the writer r' he Verses published in Belts Weis London was to turn t: e p inn iff into ridicule, and that his Lordship had not called the attention of the Jury to the injurious effects o . Or publication on the plaintiff's character. The Court grant d a ou'e to show cause. SECON dant FV.OFFICR, Coeenssaiamv, 'mkt Cr i s. —CALALar n CAZALST. l'n 'this case a highly respectable Special Jury wai summoned to assess the damages due to the plaintiff. Mr. Peter Heide Ca zalet, from the. Rev. James Om n et, a Clergyman of the Chinch of Enkland, who had allowed judgment to go by default in a suit instituted against him. for having had criminal conversation with t' e plairilirs wife. The damages *ere laid at 5,0001. T .e case recited great interest. Mr. C. F. You.ocz. in opening the case as Counsel 'or the plintiff, expres ed his concern atthe peculiarly painful nature of the case which it became his duty to submit to them, and his confidence that they would per. iorm with temperance and firmness that which should appear to them their duty with respect to the facts which le li.d to submit to them. The plaintiff. in this case. was an Office of eminence in the service ti the East India Company. He had been in India nearly chitty yeast, And now lived retired upon a pension, which had been awarded to him for his services. The defendant. the Jos y world hear with surprise and concern, was a be. neficed Clergy man of the Church of England, a mar led n a', and a near relation of the plaintiff. In the year 1809, the tatter married his present wife in India, and its tl.e year IPI3, he came to England accompanied by hi. wife and f :ur children, the fruits of their union. After a stay of about too years they went abroad attain, and in the year 1819 Mrs. Cazalet returned to England, for the purpose of superintending the edu• cart in tif their children. The defendant, who was the cousin, and hid been the school fellow of the plaintifL t ad, of course, not only from his relationship but from his sacerdotal character, the most tree access to the lam ly, and all his intentions were ascribed to the most honourable m tives. It would 1):: seen that he availed himself of these advantages and the absence of the plat tiff, to seduce the affections of his wife, and inflict those injuries for which the Jury were now to award compensation to tie plaintiff. Toe details of the circum stances, or such of them as must unavoidably be given, would best come from the witnesses by whom they were to be proved. The Jury would find that in the year 1822 the defendant procured accommodation fur the delivery of a child. Various circumstances would be given in evidence which could leave very little doubt in the minds of the Jury that the defendant was the father. It died in the following year. In 1827, the plaintiff re turned from India to the bosom of his family, nothing baying occurred opt.) that period to give him the most remote suspicion of the injury he had sustained. He was *urpti , ed, however, on his return home, at the re. quest of Mrs. Casale', that they should sleep in diffe rent beds. The Learned Counsel ascribed rh s refusal to a feeling of remorse on the part of the Lady, which at List operated so strongly upon her as to compel her to quit her home for ever, as no longer worthy of the affections of her husband and children. This took place in the month of April last, and the anhippy woman was soon after delivered of twins, 1 f which the defen• dant was undoubtedly the father. By the law, as it at present stood, since there was evidence of the possibi• lity of access by the plaintiff. he was bound to maintain And educate these children, and they could at all times enforce from him the legal duties of a parent. This was a circumstance which the Jury would doubtless take into their consideration in estimating the com pensation which was due to the plaintiff for the Zs jury be had already sustained in the loss of domes. tic ci mfort, and also in the painful feelings with which the remainder of his life must be embittered...- The Jury would judge of the plaintiff's affection for his wife by the provision he had made for her. by his ready dischaige of every expense she incurred, and by the ardent affection which she manifested towards him in her letters. He V.ould call no relation to prove the terms on which they lived. GOD forbid that he should, for none could he call but tear ones—femaler, who were already plunged in the eeepest *fil ction, and to whom a public examination on this subject would be a dreadful torture to which the plaintiff would not con. tent. even if the advocate, in the performance of his duty, could suppose it to be necessary. These had been no interruption to the plaintiff's happiness while he was in England. He left his wife pregnant, and not a pa:Cele of evidence could be produced to ion. peach any pert of the plaintiff's conduct. The Learned Counsel concluded by making a forcible appeal to tt•e Jury, that they had a Ifgli moral duct to perform, not Less towards the public than towards the unfortunate. plaintiff, whose happiness had been destroyed by one' who was a near :elation, a married man, and a Clet's gy men. . The first witness called was G. S. Brown, a Clerk in the Secretary's afire of the East India Company. The plaintiff was on the commercial establishment of the Company. Ile was about tl.e 8.11 in seniority. He was in ti.e civil service of the Madras estat.lishment. After having been out twenty eight years, he had returned; and now enjoyed his pension of from three thousand pounds to four thousand pounds per annum from the Compahy. There was no other person of the same name on the establishment. Maria Edwards deposed. that she lives with the p'aintiff's family, .11141 had lived with them upwards of 18 years. Witness knew ti.e defendant, who es a Cler gyman. residing at Chi pstead, iii Kent. Ile had a wife and five children. 1 remember the plaintiff and his wile coming to England in 1813 ; they brought four children w.th them; I came nest chit, and remained until 1815. Mrs. Cazalet was at the time in the family way; my master aid mistress v ant out of the country again; my master *chi first, because nay mistress was in the family way ; she went i i 1817, and ea ne back in 1819 with an infant, without being accompanied by Mr. Cazalet; there are now five children at school; the eldest daughter ' is about '2O years old; when Mrs. Cazalet returned in 1819, she lived at WadJin ; she afterwards went to Chandos.street, where she lived with Mrs. Arnold, the mother of the Rev. Mr. James Casale', the defendant ; the afterwards went to Pisillimore-place, Kensington ; then she took a house in Earl's -terrace, where the mother of the Reverend Gentleman lived, and the children came home. The witness then proved the handwriting of M 1 s. Cazalet in four letters, written by her to her hus. band during the months of May, July, November, and December, 1820; witness quitted the plaintiff's service in May, 1820. and returned to it in January, 1825. Ann Gods!), deposed that she was a widow s and had known the family of the Cazalets upwa r d s o f fifty years. She knew the plaintiff's father, and also the defendant's father ; they were brothels. She knew plaintiff and defendant ; they were at school together. The defend ant's father was first a merchant. and then a banker.. The defendant is a clergyman ; be held a curacy at Kitsfield, and he afterwards resided at Chepstea4 and now had six children. Witness never saw b . • ia a carriage tO the house; she lived formerly la., awe vice of the plaintiff's father; the plaintiff ' ' .1 yeas of age ; the delemigne is 48; se an t e • -.1" ~, I. ,- ' S. „ N.,. S. 1 ` ;rr