Star. — London, England, 1818-03-17 00:00:00

completion. Though this was the only head which there appeared any increase in the present .annates, those who had read the Report of the Committee and the statement of the engineer, of " he had already spoken, would feel that it was 'necessary for him to say any more on this subject. works at Chatham and Sheerness would save a • expenditure, which had formerly been called In the course of the present Session some obser vations had escaped Gentlemen, which seemed to in an opinion, that that important branch of Rri power, the Navy, had been neglected by the Go. vernment. Though this had appeared to be the opinion of some Dion. Members, from what had in cidentally escaped them when other matters *ere in -tte, he could not believe that such an idea was tously entertained. The Navy was felt by Govern to be the bulwark of the nation—the great source of its glory—and every thing had been atten to that promised to give it strength and effi- Ir. Pensions had been given of late years, not sly to disabled seamen, but to those who might, day be called upon to serve their country again. Greenwich the number of pensioners now amoun- to 35,000 ; they indeed rather exceeded that number, many of whom might again be required to The arrangements which had been made were • that an expedition could now be fitted out sooner than at any former period. He might be al lowed to remind the House how rapidly, In one re * instance, an expedition had been got ready for The expedition with which it was prepared was unexampled as was its efEciency when complete.— this the distinguished Officer who commanded it borne his testimony, and the briniant manner in the service on which it was sent had been ac .imptished, was well calculated to remove every doubt. Looking at these things—ac what was done --and what had so lately been done by the Navy, 'st be seen that the fear that the Navy had not properly attended to—had not been kept in a proper state of efficiency, was vain. A state of peace not afford those opportunities for brilliant enter • and daring achievement which necessarily ont of a state of war ; but there were under takings, even in times of peace, in which the courage, ” 1 and persevering spirit of enterprize which dis iguished the British sailor, might be most usefully Bayed. An expedition, the object of which was important to the world, was now about to leave shores. It had ever been the boast of this coun that in war it defended the weak against the tg, and in peace it had always been foremost to those arduous exertions to extend the limits of! 'graphical knowledge which her great naval means srded her peculiar opportunities of attempting t success. At present, in various parts of the ld, active and intelligent officers were making sur of coasts hitherto unexplored, or but very im perfectly known. The expedition now about to sail would attempt to solve a problem most interesting maritime science. To services of this sort, he sted, British sailors would long be directed ; but ircumstances should again plunge us in a war, powerful arm of defence, our Navy, would again nut forth with a degree of strength and rapidity had never been equalled in the history of the country. Notwithstanding the fears of some Gentle men, it would be seen, that there never was a period when this country, in the event of a war breaking , could so effectually display in all parts of the world its great ness and its power. He concluded by moving, tatasum not exceeding 2,480,6801. 17s. Ski. should be granted for the ordinary service of the Navy. Sir M. W. RIDLEY expressed a hope that the suggestions contained in the Report of the Finance - snuttee would be attended to and promptly car into execution. He rose to move an amendment, object of which was to reduce the Estimates by 2000 L in order to take off the Salaries of two of the Tunior Lords of the Admiralty. In a former Session ad moved that the number of Admiralty Lords could be diminished, but it would be recollected those situations had been defended as necessary to ive the friends of those who came into power, as a school for young Statesmen. Had he not heard this gravely stated in that House, he could sot have believed that a motion like that which he d made could he resisted on such grounds. As it been so re s isted, he should move the ameaci .:ent be had auncunced. He might have been more disposed to acquiesce in the decision which had been come to, had the question whether there ought to be or six Lords of the Admiralty been disposed of another way, but he could not help thinking, if t schools for young Statesmen were necessary, it but reasonable that the Admiralty Lords should for their own education. The 20001. which he posed to take front the Estimate, he wished struck not that it was of itself of any importance when were Noting millions away, but it was the prin ce of the thing to which he objected, and which thought called for the interference of the House. They ought to declare that in the present situation 1 - the country, they could not afford in future to 2000/. per annum for the education of young itesmen. It might be through the establishment' 'his school that an Honourable Gentleman, then its eye, had afforded him the pleasure of reading ery entertaining book, entitled, " Stories for Chii .n."—(lfear, hear.) —Though this book had consi 'able merit, he could not allow the author to be to right when he described King Charles the First ,e an excellent man and a good king. At all , ents, he could not think that either this, or the Luarterly Review, the best pages of which he under :ood owed their existence to the same able Gentle tan, and which might be considered as equally the it of the School established at the Admiralty, fur .ished a good reason for continuing thus to expend 3000/. annually—(hear, hear.) —By striking off this 2000/. though the sum was small, it would convince 'he public that the House- was sincerely anxious to 'duce the public expenditure. He hoped those who voted for the Motion of a Noble Lord on a for mer night, on the subject of the Leather Tax, would now leave the Chancellor of the Exchequer in lurch, by voting for a continuance of the present :penditure, while they voted in favour of a reduc tion of the Taxes. He moved, as an amendment, sat the sum of 2,478,6801. should be granted, in :eaZt of the sum , first moved for. Lord CASTLEREAGH did not rise for the put.. use of arguing the question which had before been -Wed, upon the propriety of keeping up the pre sent number of Lords of the Admiralty. On the oc casion which had been referred to, the question had been fully looked at in every point of view. The Board was now as it had existed for more than a century past, and fewer Commissioners, when it was considered that some were wanted at the Outports, it did not appear to him would be sufficient. All the suggestions of the Committee of Finance had been attended to. The Honourable Member had very pleasantly stated so much of the argument that had been used in the former debate on the Admiralty Lords, as served his purpose. He (Lord Castlereagh) was sure he could not state his share of it in the same pleasant manner, and should therefore trust to the recollection of the House and sit down. Mr. BANKES could so far confirm the statement of his Noble Friend as to state that the Committee of Finance had great reason to be satisfied with the economy introduced into various departments, and with the attention paid to all the suggestions they had thought it their duty to throw out. He had read that morning a minute respecting the Ordnance De partment, formerly the most expensive, which had afforded him great satisfaction, and he trusted it would be equally satisfactory to the House when it came before them. The Committee divided, when the numbers were, For the Amendment, 58—Against it, 85—Majority ngainst the amendment, 27. After the gallery was cleared for a division, and just as the tellers were proceeding to count, Mr. WIL BERFORCE popped in at one of the doors, but imme diately retreated. The tellers, however, having seen him, followed and brought him in ; when he was asked by the Chairman of the Committee whether he had heard the question put? To which h e in the negative. The Chairman then the question to be read to him, which was done, and then asked him which way he voted? Mr. WIL BERFORCE replied, for the Ayes, but took his seat among the Noes. Mr. LYTTELTON then observed, that he saw a Member among the Noes, who had declared he meant to vote with the Ayes ; and contended that he ought not, therefore, to be told in is present situa tion; he meant the Honourable Metter for Bramler. Mr. WILBERFORCE admitted that he had for a moment neglected his duty : and coming into the House when the Committee was on the point of di viding, without even knowing the subject of the de bate, he had endeavoured to withdraw ; but had been followed by the tellers, one of whom had drag ged him from the place to which he had retreated, and that in his confusion he had declared he should vote with the Ayes, when he really meant to vote with the Noes, being, determined to vote in the op posite side to the individual who had brought him forward against his will, in order to prevent his be ing treated so in future. The CHAIRMAN stated, that he conceived the Honourable Member was perfectly justified in chang ing his mind, and voting one way, after declaring his intention to vote another—(hear, hear.) Lord FOLKESTONE called the attention of the House to the declaration of the Honourable Member, that, without regard to principle or the merits of the case, he voted from the sole motive of disappointing the teller who had brought him into the House; and was proceeding to contend, that it was the duty of both the tellers to bring in any Member whom they found in that situation, when he was interrupted by a call of order; and the CHAIRMAN repeated, that the Honourable Member had a right to retract any declaration of his intentions made in error, and he was accordingly counted among the Noes. A Grant of 1,787,1811. was moved for, to cover Charges for Buildings and Repairs in his Majesty's Dock Yards. _ _ _ Sir M. W. RIDLEY called the attention of Mini sters to the situation of Pursers in the Navy. He described the case of that very meritorious class of men to be one of great hardship. They were at pre sent in great distress, and were not so numerous but they might be relieved by a sum little exceeding that which he had had the honour to propose should be taken from the Lords of the Admiralty. Mr. CROKER stated half-pay to have been allow ed to Pursers within the last three years. It would be seen that it was not in the power of the Board of the Admiralty to grant the relief called for without opening a door much larger than the Hon. Member, ' seemed to contemplate, to other applicants. He begged to state, the Board of Admiralty had already gone to the expense of keeping supernumerary clerks, which were chosen from the Pursers whose conduct had been most meritorious.—Motion agreed to. The following Grants were then voted : For provisioning Garrisons on Foreign Stations, for Ships of War and Transports, 360,0001. To cover the Expenses of the Transport Service for 1818, 178,9481- ... „225 on to c on whi estimal Comm which unnece t. , The w; i larger i • - for. I vations dicate tish pa • vernm; opinioi cident debate serious meat source ded to ciency. merely t ' one da At Gn I i ted to numbs serve. such, sooner lowed cent in sea. ' is une. To thi had be which cowl doubt. for—a it miss been I propel I did no prize grew taking skill, tingui dispbt vet y i our st try, t strong make geogr afford with• world vet's( perfe< • i . scout( I ' ' t i. to m truste if cin c that 1 . I be pu that I k :{ :‘ count men, when out, I work movil I I shoul I Sir suggi Conn ried i the of 20001 Junin 1l f he ha shoul those receiv and a . heard . t not b • t had r I had i meat i , 1 dispo . come four 1 in an such . , wall pay prop( r' off, t they ciple ~ • ; ti , he 11 They II Ir. ( •'.. . 01 . th pay, . 1 S.:Ate of th .1 1 p;i: ••i ' l r in hi a Vel t ' dren decal 1 ; cptitt to bE r it • even .6 Qua, stoo. ) ' man fruit Wish , '200( ‘..tiX.h '1 I . • r the I reds had mer 1 not • the 1 cape tion I that i! stew I f L , I\, 11 pose LicCi , ).. ,N . .... ~\ .. , .. ' \ i 1 4 ? 6 HIGH BAILIFF OF WESTMINSTER. Mr. MARSH moved for she grant of a sum in favour of the High Bailiff of Westminster. This he stated to be a case of pure unmixed justice, which he should but impair if he spoke on it at any length. He begged to remind the Committee, that a grant in favour of this Gentleman had been recommended by a Committee of the House four years ago. 'The High Bailiff, in the elections which had occurred of late years, had taken the course which had been in variably pursued by his predecessors in office, by erecting hustings ; and had not this been done, scenes of riot must have occurred that would infallibly have proved utterly subversive of the Right of Election. The High Bailiff had been refused payment by one of the persons elected. He had, in consequence, brought his action, but the Court deciding against him the action was lost, and the High Bailiff was left 1,5001. out of pocket. He now came to that House, not for that sum, but merely for the sum of 8001. which he had lost by the election of 1812. The loss which had fallen on the High Bailiff had beer. caused by a blunder on the part of that House in its Acts, which had not privided for the contingency of an involuntary candidate, if he might be called a candidate, who did not offer himself as such. Before he appealed to the liberality of that House, the High Bailiff had sought redress in a Court of Justice. The expense he had incurred was incurred under a Bill which had originated in that House. Through the use there made of the word " candidate," he had lost the power of enforcing that right, which it was ob viously the intention of the Legislature to give. He moved that the sum of 8001. should be granted to re-imburse the High Bailiff of Westminster, for ex.: penses thrown on him by the Election of 1812. - Mr. BANKES caid the motion was so irregular, so differestfroni any he had ever heard before, that on the ground of order alone he must oppose it as untenable. He must object to a grant being tleig 'moved, for such a purpose as a matter of supply, even if the expense which had fallen on the indivi dual had been the consequence of a blunder of that House, which he utterly denied. He wished to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if the consent ofthe Crown had been obtained to this grant, as from the time of Queen Anne no such resolution could be pro posed, without the consent of the Crown. The impor tance of such a guard on the inconsiderate liberality of Parliament he strongly insisted upon, and without it he was satisfied that House would be tea times more prodigal than ever the servants of the Crown were. Mr. BROGDEN apologized to the Committee fee not having stated the consent of the Crown to have been obtained. Mr. BANKES still objected to the form. Mr. BROGDEN thought the objection of the Right Hon. Gentleman might perhaps be obviated introducing the words "granted to his Majesty." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated the consent of the Crown to have been obtained four years ago. Mr. N. CALVERT wished to know what were the emoluments of the office of High Bailiff? These might be so considerable as to make it but reasonable that he should bear the expense, which had been l thrown on him by an unexpected contingency. Mr. BROUGHAM thought the claim that of,jus tice, and did not see that any reason could be given why the expense of the election should be thrown on the High Bailiff. The blunder under which this ex pense had been incurred, it might be said, was not peculiar to that House, as the Act which contained rt was the Act of Parliament. It was however more peculiarly theirs, as it was found in an Act for regu lating elections, with which they had no wish that the other House should frequently interfere. He thought there was a strong claim upon the House. Mr. WYNNE thought it would be desirable that the Report of the former Committee should he printed and put into the hands of Members. He much doubted whether the words of the Act would oblige the High Bailiff to erect hustings, in such a case as that for Westminster in 1812. ( Mr. Brougham here said that the words were imperative.) If the words really were imperative, then, instead of beginning with a vote in the Committee of Supply, they should pass an Act declaring by whom the expense of erect ing hustings was to be borne. He could not under stand how, in the caw of Westminster, the expense of erecting the hustings could amount to 8001. Mr. BROUGHAM said, lie happened to be the Counsel in the case of Westminster alluded to. He could assure his Honourable Friend that every item of the expenses in that case was completely made out and proved. The expenses did not consist merely in the timber, and labour of putting it together, but re tainers to poll clerks, and a thousand other items.— The existing Act was only a temporary Act, and would expire either this year or soon after. Mr. C. WYNNE wished to know whether the mo tion before the Committee was confined only to the case of 1812? lle still could not: understand how, in the few hours that the election in 1812 lasted, such an expense as 800/. could be incurred Mr. BROUGHAM assured his Honourable Friend that every item in the charge had been scrupulously examined. Mr. WYNNE said the total amount of the charge was 1,600/. but as there was a nonsuit in one of the actions, in the other the recovery was only against one of the candidates, and of one moiety of the whole expense. Why, if there was only one candidate against whom the plaintiff could recover, did not he recover the whole sum against that one ? Mr. B. BATHURST read an extract from a legal opinion by Mr. Richardson, stating the legal reason why only 8001. could be recovered at law. The Re port alluded to by his Hon. Friend (Mr. Wynne) might be had by any Member who chose to apply for a copy of it. Mr.BARCL AY trusted that if this grant was agreed to, the House would make up the loss sustained on like occasions by the High Bailiffs of every large town. Mr. C. CALVERT concurred in what was said by the Hen. Gentleman who spcke last. Mr. LOCKHART said, if the Hon. Gentleman who spoke last would take tlr2 trouble of examining, they would find that this grant would be a precedent for no other grant whatever. The High Bailiff of Westminster was, by Act of Parliament, liable to be proceeded against by information, or indictment, as an enemy to the public peace, if he had not erected the hustings in such a case as that of 1812. The CHAIRMAN suggested, that the technical objection of the Honourable Member for Corfe Castle (Mr. Bankes) might be removed by framing the mo tion thus—" That 8001. be panted to his Majesty, for the purpose of enabling ins Majesty to indemnify the High Bailiff." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that this case was completely distinguished from any other. The charge in this case was thrown upon the High Bailiff in a way that never was intended by the Act of Parliament. Although lie had a great ob jection to indemnifications of this kind, the present ca,e was one of which Parliament certainly ought to make up the loss. After a few words from Mr. N. CALVERT, the Gallery was cleared for a divison but none took place, and the vote was agreed to. Report to-morrow. NATIONAL MONUMENT. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the Order of the Day for the House taking into consideration that part of the Lords Commissioners' Speech, which related to the Building of Churches. Mr. TIERNEY gave notice that soon after the holidays he would move, that the Sum granted by Parliament for the erection of a Monument to com memorate the Victories by Sea and Land, be laid out in the erection of a Parish Church for that purpose. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQL ER said, • 1 that the subject to which he was about to call the attention of the House was not connected with that alluded to by the Right Hon. Gentleman, in as much as an economical arrangement for the building and enlarging of Churches throughout the Kingdom, was very different from the erection of a Monumental Church upon a great scale of ornamental architec ture. At the sane time ha was far from being dis inclined to coincide with the-view of the Right llon, Gentleman on this suliicet—(bear, hear, hear,)—tier he thought that if the Right do him the favour to commit) subject, it world be found that His own opinion was, that notl than that National Monument applicable to purr:es of gent Mr. TIERNEY expressed what had fallen frum th• rig', man on this subject. It was so view had been adopted in th could be molt advantagccu:l 2 into execution, that he ccAlcl the I louse upon it. BC:LDING AND ENLARSTNI On the motion of the CHA CHEQUER the House they, Committee on that part of the Oteech•whicll related to the bu The CHANCELLOR of Perhaps no communication made by the Crown to Partial as having given more generai don at large, than that conti under the consideration of till was considered, that so long Parliament had found it i.et.e large scale, with the same v' then voted by Parliament ha , erection of no more than el. was considered that since th done by Parliament, it waq m the public should look with a tude to a proposal of such a have justified the delay whit the circumstance of -..he count in a long and expensive `A . the exetuun of i* . s utmost ener the war much had !seen done ' the Ecclesiastical Establishm. berality had always been In: ions. But any liberality of inefficacious, if there was no tion for the population in pI Within the period which he I mense increase in the popula concentration of the populat; there was a total %sant of greater part of those inclined —The inadevacy claccom arose from the great cite :< nally marked out ; tration of the population, i provements in agricultural, facturing districts. In c, the population of Englitt.l h increase had taken place pt . - , and in the ]urger towns. Fr(, the table of the House, Regent, it appeared that th , in the parishes in the sever:a those parishes of which the thousand, and the church.ts modating half the parishig) 11,600; in York, 8,709; in ford, 2,422. So that the prof in the larger parishes in Li Oxford, m the ratio of foth the expedience of the ',rope to make on the general nom Nvould be better to introd striking cases. From the Item tioned he might select 27 pari raged excess of the populatic7 datien was 20,000 persons. were in the metropol;s. In t in the Fields, in which the de some others in the metropot sons for whom there WAS no parish in Liverpool the whole and there was accommodatii ing a deficiency of 73,000, accommodation. In Man persons, there was accommi leaving 68,100 unaccommi three parishes which he ha( 210,000 for whom there w; In stating this deficiency, 1 would he necessary to pro\ the whole number ; of course, the whole amount of the deli on account of those who, b' or necessary domestic avocal fiom attending Divine Secs considered that if Service was a day, it would render it accommodation for the v. ho fore thought that Par Lamer supply the deficiency comp for the accommodation of o pulation. Much useful inf ., was contained in a public: first sight, it might appear pulation beyond the accomm' that every effort must be um an accurate abstract of the st the accommodation in place —The population of Loud< .1,129,000, and there was 1.51,000, leaving an c.ccss modation of 9,7,000. In tl from there being any part oi ded with accommodation, ti in the churches than was nience of the inhabitants. all the ancient large towr.s. man origin contained ampls in those since built, and espee Reformation, that the greate From what he had before st ficiency in the Diocese of was less striking that in La York there were o: it c 720.000 inhabitants. and :11 commodation for 140,000, 1 modated. In the Diocese parishes and ‘.. 7 (28 cl.urchc was 1,250,000 ; the churc: 240,000, leaving a deficienc therefore appeared that the were in the Dioceses of Ls House must be aware how most careful clergyman, ht curates to attend to 40,01 n poses—for instance, to adi nwnt.—To give the House I 91 duty was upon the Clerg• m . I .k i ll t i:C it la si e:::: .. ' til l l er :: : : ... n ..,. ous pal a they did n ot ,i: . ~ to quoti thing ocr.:' 1 ' '.'"': ,at he had •L..,!,, r f t.: who w crap utility. ' A t Gentlen i sweat sazi.ra ' the Churcl rht lion o, c ', ' .l '''' 0.17.1,.,, , so mite. lie.te r d,„ .. b-t • --- ti tarter ;,, • - „. y and prey »; • trinctoie:tgfibei,:eepthrtitiee: A not Lut. a, • • it was poi n 5 :,... ., e such sev " r •' - ` -r or cut: • , per haps kN071.1.e.P c: . bey of ch r. resolc, .: .t..,.,. -• , .0, besiie e Lords Cr ..,,,,..i p .• . t o f Christ: pailding of Ch un ;; Each 1 eit LX 4:114 1 [ . .. i . , -,,.. l e ss chat I wLicl, !-,ad el ., t. .le. Th 4 ivei'llidle.illbiar:sar:Ceby:::‘.:ll•:.i.nirillta:Tn7(sciltclilli:!F.'en:lderi;c-zt.:::tttil:';'::1:-7.4i...'' ecessity icn chic c was ar p t of view as above a centr - ..: to the o • ropose. • e extent nor in o 0 ... T7 . ch .trehes • - .mmissi. . 4..1 .e Atli, .-.....1. . granting :. -....r. rs woull not to hr ‘ ,..„ ndali . I tr a na . y ..l. l : l . l l itiviii:2 o lse er ,...: . j .... ::• c ... i a great de gree o f . I , t tof the -.ire the b . IA had taken ?lace,' • hef vchi the mot , ,-ar, whicr. :;-,Fi r .j, arged c erg'C'' T lat ~ ^.7.2 z . . 1.1 ,to Mel r. by l'arl.:stre.c tr. ~ ...- , 2 or at Il lac.::, nrd !1... ... .: SI Cop Seal, • :lint kiaa •ac t : ••• ' . by Pa of sot :cleat .....er s , was ini places o: i.,..:..H. • .ndon, had mer,:ior.r.. . upon tl were ation, a-.. 1 7,... tion had b: hes. ratrinna ~...... .ne. It acc ut woul i to attend iubp., .. imodatiom in 5,..:-..,. % the kin "; ivy, it I ( - tithe Psrishe , tali ' • . on of tl • cases, from f...,::,,,. .ad not occasio:.oi 1:.• 1,:.., • eir abi hut still rror;; - .7..., was to course c. 1:.0 111:c ' 1 in the s bad i5.....iy jou:AL. : .shes ant ~.:-1.11... in :he -.e: modatic , ....... ...1....rn51.,_ .-... t , aasa cc • con:r, , aild of fat 1 , 1. & I-. sen of c le ‘,:•- • • , -.. : r• , .., ~,,,.., _ .. - ....ta t 1 ) '' o pn i n 'o' c l :-. 7 ., : ri l n ac c tiaPab v.:a f ' s-- I th ele e l in c p,Q tet:ct ia r : . : .. ..Cl . l .ll 7, 3 . a ji.,,'.. , ,e,,:-,,..,!,„ : -., 1 respec sure, it est. in th s Parish. _Coy 4 a Chester, • •,193,; i-:, C.,. : mighi purpose ..t ndon encercled f:tva ld be pi ,i ct i:7; ri s u t c : l e t.y e i w t : l ; .) b t c '..faher;Lilll:lce case. i I: ";4 1 : 1 7 :. ::: ',.. e n d : °lt h'. : P u l' done . o ll nl Karns whie . e. he 1-......5.....5. re the r parishes i....r.1f.c.: . ...e .i...e• way of :itn abate ;:tc .........scs bent w; Of these ~.,:r,.hz. , -...-5 patron the parish a t ::„ ~,,,,......, fight th: leticiency W.I, I.: , 7 1 ..1i dcd, th lis, there ...Try ~ :e„,,, .., strict di o accommodarica , . Is ,v txtent ile pa l atal:l6on 50. b.•,. • t ally: ca ion for only '21,01ki.:: , emus), for whom there c: .: mil i be nchester, out ef - .J.: , one i nodation for orly :1..., plan, 1 nodated ; so ths! ::: .... of into id mentioned, t 1.....:, zf: new c. Pas no accommoi..:.:.- Id be he did not ?ter. ..0....: when avid:: a :coiraroc!a; 7..: : divicin se, a •'• 17 - i,re deiacr.: r ; -- PpiDnt , itic'peroy as as to lo : •. a puld i Lions,reasotn ;._f ne 7OLi L a i .. b.; - i: ;.... ' - 1 . ' 1.; bus o l e nice. It wis ;„.... clesia .as performed se. ,7 . • . pa leis necessary I, 7 .- .f ch ole at one tme. L. :-.• •• • ini 1 lift would rely a... • es ret plaited of, if :: 77 • .., pari, one-third of i.ei v. , .:, , colon formation on :: .• ..::: .: ehes ration by . ..I:. 1... c. :: .mod • that the co - l ...: s:: *: : ' iese si mod .tsar. was..it..• of ti navailing. 7.',... i ~.e ~, . ':stabl state of the population .- . 1 :out at ices of 1)::,.:c. %\ . L. - ..5 . :.:r - on so don and is c...::::: 7. s . ed 4 accomracds.:::. :0: C 7:; cowl ; unprr.7id,...". -.vizi: 0.." . A the City c:' Lome..:: : y per . Di tf.ta pai-,..1.::i,n :::-.F: • . ch, n there was ct-ca atc:or.• -- • oars necessar: f.:r .::e :::. - red v And this ..--,:s i.:e c...:,': . e vet A¶.l :hot: :,- - •.nt e... . • . 'idle, le accorr.ntedat.ar.. 1:1 -, of 1 ;pecially in t.:ose r',.:r '..: ante. atest deficiency 1 - 7 , '.r:: :' ' ce, i stated, that th'. o r : ::::..•••• ions f York :• was grea:•". ti.... e, 2 oladen. In the I) . .'x'o' ' par churches to acconotr,•••- all tip laese churches atfordei'-•• respe, leaving 5r4).000 t.a...,...7. in th, of Chester there s ,- r.c ..: incur ''''• The actual -vat. it ,. : s wilt oi;:ohymesof::astcbc'orinlvke:a:.md-!1:tit:Iti..cr:.•:;::: :ifieas° .ondon and t'he-tcr. It 4 pAti wimpossible it %.....c 'cr i ' . . c ::ur w t owever well sup! ""` antes X) persons for der: - .1" - ' ill tlc 'minister the Hol; 'z . : ..Colie some idea %%hat t'af ' • :: nea r , g yman in some cf 1.::::.`• Teti •... ..... -