Star. — London, England, 1801-08-20 00:00:00

DUBLIN, AUGUST 15. On Thtirfday night, at the hour of ten o'clock. as Mr. RYAN and Mr. lIURRDWFS were returning Ii ifh!own, they were flopped near the draw bridge leading to . Ringlend by three armed men,' who took from Mr. I?URROWE3 one guinea note and 4. or ss. The robbers offered no injury, but appeared much diCappointed in not finding more money. Two cf them were dreffed in failors' jackets, and appeared able flout men; the other was a labouring young man. On Monday lab, Alderman JAMES, affifted by Major SIRR, searched the houfe of a Printer, not far from Alibey-fliect, where they found a great number of feditious books and rebellious Tongs, &e. They alfo found Remembrances of Heroes, now no more—the portrait of Lord EDWARD FITZGERALD; Plaifter of Paris mafgnes, taken from the visage of the traitor TONE, after he had cut his throat ; panegyrics upon Ors, and a long et cetera of rnifchievou s libels. The Printer himfelf they could not find,. but they brought away the books, papers, and reiiques. Yeller day fennight, the aflion at the fuit of Mr. DANIEL DONOVAN, againit the Proprietors of the Cork Advertifer, for a libel, came on to be tried at Tralee, county of Kerry, before the Hon. Juftice Jon sisoe and a Special Jury, compofed of the molt refpecciable gentlemen of that county: After the cafe of the Plaintiff had been fully proved, the Jury retired about ten minutes, and although the damages were only laid at ioool. returned a ver diet for the Plaintiff, goof. damagei, and 6d. coils. Yeflerday a couple of females exhibited a coffin near the wooden building leading to Carl i fle-bridge, for the purpofe of operating on the fenfibility of paffengers in that thoroughfare, under pretence of colleCting a fmallfurn for the fepultnre of an unfor : tunate friend or relative. Through the humanity of the people they (ban obtained 8 or roe and we suppose were complimenting them/elves on the in genuity of the device, when unluckily for them a peace officer interrupted all farther receipts, by fume ill-timed inquiries, and, finding it a fettled plan of impofition, took the principal into custody, and obliged her to carry her empty (hell to one of the seatili-houfes. CataicersacusAssizss.—OnFriday, the 3ifl July Lit, the above Affizes, held before the Hon. Mr. Jultice CHansiat.Atut, ended, at which the firllowing perfons were tried and found guilty of different offences: Daniel MiClean, for affaulting John Tarnley, on the sd of July laft at Belfalt—ordered to pay a fine of 201. and imptifoned until be (hall give fure ties for peace and good behaviour for (even years. Miriam Mostrey, corivisfted of felonioully taking main gown and bed-gown, on the loth of June WI, at Tornarabat, the property of Henry Clarke, Efq..—ordered to be privately whipped. . Catherine Bawls, Elissabetb Barb, aad Letitia Pif , Afallart, (women of bad repute) were indiilled for, that a perfon unknown did felonioufly alter a principal earn in a promiffory note of the bank of Sir Thomas Lighton and Co. to wit, altering the words " five pounds thirteen !billings and nine pences" in raid note, to the words " eleven pounds fives and firpence"—and the.wnrds " five guineas.' in Paid note, to the words " ten guineas" ....and that they, well knowing the fame to be falfely and felonioufly altered, did tender it as true, with intent to defraud Thomas M'Donnell and James M'Clpery. The firll wieners produced on the part of the Cronm was George Monro, of Belfaft, who depot . - ed that in the month of May tall, two of the pri loners, Catherine and Elizabeth Burke, came to his bode, and requefted to have particularly a five guinea note of Sir Thomas Lighton's Bank ; that he, on extunining, found he had a five guinea note ref bank, which he gave to the prifoner Ca therine, and for which he received in exchange three guineas in gold and two guinea notes; that his name was on the note, prior to his giving it to the prifoners ; the note was Men produced, and Upon receiving it, fwore•the name on the note was, his hand writing, but could not (wear it was the fame note he gave the prifoners. The nest witnefs produced was J. M'Guckin, 4 who proved that he had lately fent fome notes to the witnefs Monro, among which was a five guinea note fimilar in number to the one produced, but could not pofitively (wear it was the fame. Monro being then again called on, proved that the five guinea note he received from M'Gnckin, was the lame he gave to the priebner Cath. Burke. A clerk belonging to Meters. M'Clecry and M'Donnell, was then produced, who (wore that the prifoner, Letitia M‘Mullan, came to his em ployer's houfe, on the tsth of May laft, for force rum, for which the gave a ten guinea note of Sir Thomas Lighton's Bank, and received others in exchange ; laid he obeerved the name Menroy on the note, the only name he mill think like it in the town being Monro, and 0111;:rving, More dole. lv, he perceived the letter y added in a different band-writing and ink—faid politively that the note then produced was the lame he received from Le titia M'Mullan.—On being crof—e xamined by Mr. BALL (prifLners Connie!), he faid he had declared more than once, that he could not (wear to the identity of the note, even after the prifoners were in gaol, and after he had teen the note in the hands of the magiftrate—faid the reafon of his doubt was, that he had rut the note into an open drawer, where parbly it might be chinged. To obviate which, Mr. Isl‘Dolincll was then produced. who proved that he taw his clerk put a ten guinea note into the drawer, and that it was not changed by him. Mr. Holland, clerk to Sir Thomas Lighten, proved the note to be of Lighton and Shaw'. bank, that it was not iffued as a ten guinea note ; but could net f..y what precife turn it was iffued fir. Here the proi ceution doled, and Mr. Ball fat ing that his cli..itts cafe nut being of that nature to admit of evidence, the lion. and Learned Judge with an impartiality and eloquence, %lid] is his rharaEL:rillic' franmed no the evideac:, and the Jury, att•zr a few minutes :.onfultat:en, rettaned ifSSIZES, &e; ESSTX ASSTZES.-CHELMSFORD, PLY 2 4 . Die em dem. PAL MEN V. BLOOMFIELD. DFSCEN'T OF LANDS. This was an Action of Ljeament, to recover certain Copyhold Lands. Mr. CARROW laid, he was Connfel for the Lef for of the Plaintiff, and he thonld Rate the cafe as Ihortly as poflible, as it was a quellion of law, rather than of fuel, namely:—whether an Ell ate ihould defcend to him who was the Heir at Law, or whether, by the Copyhold Cullom of the Ma nor in which it was fituated, the Child of the youngeft Daughter thould not be preferred to the Child of the eldelt Son? He fhould fubmit ti at the defcent mull be governed by the Common Law, unlefs a clear Cullom to the contrart could he eft:if:abed controuling the Commotf Law. He admitted it might be pollible for the King's Serjeant to thew, that, in cafe of a firft defcent, loch a cuftom might prevail; hut he fhould infift, however that might be, it could not extend further ; betides, he thould thew inftances to the contrary, and if he did, the cullom was de flroyed, for it was neceffary it fhould have been uniform and fixed. He thould proceed to the proof of the cafe, referving any further obferva. bons till after he had heard his Learned Friend's defence. _ . It was admitted between the parties that the Premifes it ere within the Manor of Lawford ; but Daniel Sider, the original Purchafer, died, felled of the fame, according to the cultom of the Manor, about the month of September, 1765, inteflate and without ilfuc, leaving Roger Sider, his nephew, and Mary Bloomfield, his niece; that Roger was the only fon and heir of Roger Sider, the eldell brother of Daniel Sider, and Mary Bloomfield, the only child and heirefs of Henry Sider, the youngell brother of Daniel ; that on the death of Daniel, Roger entered on the Eflate, and was admitted thereto as nephew and heir of Daniel; that loon after the faid entry, John Bloomfield, in right of his wife, Mary, claimed the Premifes, and brought au AEtion of Ejeament in the Court of Common Pleas, in the year 1767, in which there was a Ver did for the Defendant. That Roger in the year 1799 devifed the Mate to William Palmer, the Leffor of the Plaintiff, having previoufly furren• dered the fame to the ufe of his lafi Will. That Palmer on his death entered and was admitted, and received the Rents till he was turned out by the Sheriff, under a Writ of Poffeflion. That af ter the death of Roger Sider, John, and Mary Bloomfield, who claimed as reprefentative and heirefs of Henry, the younger Brother of Daniel, brought another Aelion ofEjedment in 1781, in which theft was a Verdi& in their favour; that loon after William Palmer brought an Aiftion to recover back the Premifes, which was tried, and a Verdi& given for the Defendant; that after the recovery by Bloomfield and his wife i they entered, but Mary died before (he was admitted, and Henry Sider Bloomfield, her fon and heir, was after wards admitted as the great nephew and heir of Daniel Sider.—!.lr. Gerrow faid he was dcfirous of bringing a quellion of this fort to a point; the only point in dilpute was, whether the defcendants of a younger :idler were to be preferred to thofe of an elder Brother? he had to contend that the cuhlom was confined to hauls, and did not extend to collaterals. Mr. Jurlice C ROSE obferved, that the queftion was, whether the Tenure by the Cullom was not in the nature of Borough Englifh, bL which, if the father died, his ) oungeft fon took his elate ? Mr. Sergeant SH pH SIM admitted, that by the Law of England, except in the County of Kent, where gavelkind prevailed, it was enough for a man claiming an eftate to fay his father or uncle had died (cured of it, and that he was his oldeft fon and heir. But in the prefent cafe it had been al ready eftablithed upon evidence, that in the manor of Lawford, the youngeft fon, brother, or nephew, took by dercent in preference to the eldell A Ju ry had fo found the raft, and in confequence of their verdift the Plaintiff had been turned out. — Another Jury had afterwards confirmed that ver diet, and the Defendants had been quietly in pof felßon of the rents and profits ; and had not the prefent aftion been brought juft at the time it was, twenty years would have clzpfed, and the Plain tiff would have been driven to his Writ of Right. The cultotn for which he fhould contend in oppo fition to the common law of the country was by no means fingular, for there were a great number of copyholds in which Borough Englifh prevailed. His Learned Friend and his Clients knew, that with regard to the manor of Lawford, the right of the youngelt branch of a family to inherit before the chief, had been conftant and invariable, and that by the cuftom it bad not been confined to the youngeft fon, hut applied to remoter defcents.— The principle on which he fhould feel him fell war ranted in ;Acing for a verdil was, that if he prov ed the cuilum to have exifted in ancient times, no thing afterwards could ever alter it—if he proved that it prevailed in the reigns of King Henry VIII. and Queen Elizabeth, no compaft between the Lords and the Tenants could ever have got rid of it. A cuftom of a manor could not be furrender• ed like a, right of common ; nothing but the power of Parliament could alter the tenure and though a thoufand inflances were produced in contradic tion to a cultom, they would not lipify. A cur torn proved to have exifted as far back as Richard I. previous to the Holy War, was like a lay, of the Mcdcs and Perfians. The Court-Rolls of the ma nor of I.r.n lord would prove this cuftorn to have been oval with that King, and would carry it downward to more modern times. [The Learn ed Setjeant proceeded to Rate the entries on the Rolls of the Manor, as we (hall detail them in'the evidence, obrc: sing, that in the lisle of fu many age; there were neeelfarily charms in the Records, hich prevented his g v ing s regularferies cfproof.) Mr. Round, Steward of the Manor, produced the Court Rods. firft entry was in the t sth of Elizabeth.— It was prefcmLd by the homage that Edward Tl:nric died, of certain lands, and that Tho mas Thome, his yowler brother, anJ next heir, 4 1E, was admitted to thief, according to the cttltom oil the Manor, &c. 40th Elizabeth. It was prefented that John Ely died, feifed of certain hinds which he had taken as heir to his mother, Rachael Ely ; and that after his death Thomas Manning, ettmnrpilus junior & proximui hires, was admitted, and afterwards fun-endued them to George Manning, his elder brother. There were fcveral other cut: les in fub fequent reigns, proved to the fame (Ire& Upon the Crofs.ezarnination of Mr. Round, by the plaintiff's Counfel, it appeared the Rolls con tained the following entries : 19th Charles 11. The homage prefent the death of Daniel Sydney,•and the admiffion of John Sp.!. ney,frater maximur & Arra. 6th Q . 2 . een Ann. The homage prefent the death of Stephen Clarke ; and Robert Clarke, rjus !rater nails maximus & bore!, was admitted according to the cuftom of the Manor. 3d November, 1758. The homage prefent that Thomas Mafon died, feifed cf certain Lands, and that John Mafon, his eld.:11 nephew and heir, was admitted. Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD addrefred the Jury, in reply to the evidence of the more modern entries, by which it appeared the elder brothers and ne phews had been admitted as heirs. He founded the whole of his argument upon thefe entries being fubfecinent to the reign Of Elizabeth, at which time he contended he had eftablinsed the cuftom in favour of the younger branches, and obferved, that the innovation mutt have arifen inconfequence of the Rolls not having been regularly kept, and the Rewards not having given themfelves the trou ble to refer to the ancient ones to afcertain what the cuftom was. He referred to his former argil. ment, and infilled that having ellablifhed the cuf tom in the reign of Elizabeth, no aa done after wards could vary it. Mr. Gmutow replied, and maintained that the few entries produced at fo remote a period as the reign of Elizabeth, were not fuflicient to fet up a cuftom in oppufttion to the general law of the land. . Mr. Jurtice GROSE faid he was glad to have ob ferved the uncommon attention the Jury had paid to this cafe. The queftion was a fhort and fimple one ;—it was a mere matter of raft as to the ezift ence of a particular cuftom. With regard to the general law there could be no doubt, for every one knew that if a man died poffeffei of an eftate, his :Weft fon fucceeded to it, in preference to the younger! : there was as little doubt that in many places a cuftom called Borough Englifh prevailed, by which the youngeß fon took, in eaclufion of the eldeft ; but fucfi a curt= was to be conftrued ftridly, and if the words were, that the youngeß brother fhould take, it did not apply to any re moter defcent. The learned Judge recapitulated the entries read on the part of the plaintiff and de fendant, and obferved, that the eziftence of the cuftom was warranted by the admiflions in the reign of Elizabeth, and whatever was the cnftorn at that time mott certainly waathe fame now. Af ter commenting at great length on the evidence and arguments ofCounfel,he Rated, that the whole refolved itlelf into the tingle queftion, Whether the cqttom was well proved or not ? If the Jury were fatisfied there had at any time ezified a cuf tom in oppofition to the Common Law, their verdift would be for the Defendant ; if, on the contrary. they thought the entries in the reign of Elizabeth were not fufficient proof, they would find for the Plaintiff, with one (hitting damages. The Jury retired from the box fome time, and returned a verdi& for the Defendant, thereby eßa blifhing the Cullom of the Manor in favour of the younger Defcendants. On Saturday Jail was executed on the Caftle Hill, Norwich, purfuant to his fentence, Henry Lawn, aged 41, for burglary and horfe-healing. He died refigned and penitent for the offences he acknowledged to have been guilty of, but denied to the lan having committei thok for which he fuffered. Property dolen at the time of the burg laiT, was found, and the in rfe had alto been feen in his poffelLon, but which he declared he had re ceived from a man who.had abfconded. He has left a wife and fix children to lament his untimely end. After the fentence of the law, his body was delivered to his friends for interment. Lavm, at the death of the prefent poffeffor, would have en joyed a confiderable property, which is entailed on his children. Saturday William Baldwin (a foldier in the 3d regiment of Dragoons) was executed at Ipfwich, for robbing Mr. Grofe on the highway, purfuant to his fentencc at the hitt affixes. His behaviour was firm and penitent, yet he whited in his inno cence of the offence for which he filtered to the LA, although he acknowledged being along with the party who committed the robbery. He de clared he was info complete a hate of intoxication, as to be ignorant not only of the commiton of the faft, but of the intention to perpetrate it. He was a native of Rufhlsury, in Shroilliire. An opulent clothier in Yorkfhire was laft week committed to York Cattle, charged with giving rifon to his reputed daughter, a fine girl near tour years old, and by which he occationed the lit tle innocent's death. On Monday re'nnight a coach was overfet on Shields Road, near Newcaßle, from the honks taking fright, and a gentleman within had one of his arms broken. On Friday LA a man was found dead on Pen. Common m Kent ; his body was taken to the Crocked Bat public-bottle, joining the Common, where the Jury fat. The verdict was brought in —&c into! Death. The following accident happened on Sydenham Common on Monday WI :—One of the Royal Eafi-India Volunteers being iil the aft of ramming down his charge, preparatory to his tiring at the target, the nmiket ticcidentally went off, and (hot his thumb away. Jt is imagined that he brought his piece down on the full cock after pritning. A woman, an attendant in St. Bartholomew's liofpital, was committed to Neu-gate for trial, for embezzling lineraheets, and other at tick:, belong ing to the hofpitAl, which flse pledged. THE ITAItIVIA'S PACKWOob'S P3fte, Sir, and Strop, I adopt in my Clop. 12:17.0: f :01116 38 pit ao they CAM Ainrt won the Ceder'. fzars VhenT.tyl• , m their 'beer! P.\.6.' ono', , tt your m .n No. 16, Gme..hui,Ml.tri.ei, ' ECCLESIASTICAL PIiFFERNIVVT.i. The Right R ev. th.• Lord &lb.'? Drc.:,,.rc ha. • to appoint the Rev. Roh.:rt n. • i.. It. ei Tr ;:y ,4. Cambridge, and Ailiftuot Pie. eller at St. :1,1411,1's of his Lordfl.ip's Domeltic Chaplains. . Friday laR, the Rev. Thomas G: Taylor, ,• Trinity College, Cambridge, was ehofen Ledo ter of of Dedham, Elie:, on the refigration of th. Re, I )r.G•: r,•:•-w;,r The Rev. George Betts, cf Wortham, Suffolk, is ...nib the I.ord Bilhop of Litchfield and Coventry, to the Pea,,•.: Barwick and Whittington, in the cathedral of I sitchheki. DIVIDENDS. Sept. 9. Robert Hampton, of Rotherham, Voridhire, _ keeper, at eleven, at the Spread Eagle Inn, in 113•.;1..... Dit r ch;Manchefter. Sept. 2t. John Stringer, of Stockport, Cheshire, cotton-mane. Indium, at eleven, at the White Lion Inn, Stockp,rt. Sept. p. Jofeph Bceilon, of Manehefter, merchant, at thrcc, a. Spencer's Tavern, Manchefter. Sept. to. John Salmon, of Sunderland near the Sea, Dne..in coal-fitter, at twelve, at the Caillc Eden Inn, at elide -et Sept, re. Joule Gard, of North Tauton, Dcvoneure,merch. at four, at Plaillips's Hotel, Exeter. Odtober 22. James Haley Needham; of St. Neot's, Humirg. doulhire, draper, at eleven, at the Falcon Inn. St. Nrot', Sept. 8. Abraham Taylor, of Weniozit-Itreet, Old-Ilrect, Lrn don, thimble-maker, at ten, at Guildhall. BIRTHS. At Derfingham, near Lynn, Norfolk, the Lady of Huey Prefcot Elencowe, Efq. of a fun. At Vale Lodge, Leatherhcad, Atignft 3d, Mrs. R. Whirt foord, of a daughter. On tl e 4th of Fe'sruary. in India, the Lady of Colonel Jame. Pringle of the Hon. Eaft India Compaii; 'sh mice, of a clatT,h;c:. On the rath intl. In qt . ..cen-ftrect, Edinburgh, Mrs. of a fon. MARRIED. On Sunday lift, Mr. Thomas Parker, oh Dridgc-firccc,Weft- Walter, to IVllfs Mayo, of Oatord•ilreet. Thurfd.iy latt, at Tom nhuni Chur.. - .lt, Mr. James Arlo, -a. of Crof.olanc, St. Mary Hill, nterotraut, to Mirs. S. Po..11:11, On the 12th inft. at Burford, Liratenant-Crdonel Littl:, of the fall India Company's ferrice, to Miff Sophia Chasidic, of that place. At Kinnatles, on the 3J inftant, Anthony Murray, Efq. of Cr iff, to Mils Helen Bower, fourth daughter of Alexander Bolter, Efq. of Kincaldrum. DIED. On the t ath irritant, at his hO2;E: in Berneerfireet, Richard Fairfield, Efq. At Linlithgow, on the 2d inft. Mrs. Janet Rankine, wife of Mr. Andrew Bartholomew, tnerchaat there. Rlogiton, Jamaica, on the toth of May loft, Mr. George Gilfillan, merchant. At her houfe, in St. David4leect, Edinburgh, on the 7th init. Mrs. Katharine Edmouftone, relict of the Utz George Nicolfoo, Efq. of Jerelfton. On the 3d intl. the Rev. Edward Hughes, Reeler of Shen• ningtun, Gioucelterfitire. Lately, on a farm of Lord Pen►byn's, near Chapel Cut;ig,, Carnarvonihire, Owen ap Owen, aged 104. On the 22d ult. in the 7ift year of his age, John Roberts, Efq. of Saddieworth. On the IR init. J. Hankinfon, Efq. of Prefton. r• On the isth init. at his houfe, at Weitham, Mc; ChdRIS. pher Barton Metcalf, Efq. On Frleay the trth in& by a fail from his hoer, at nentrim. Park, in Yorldhlre, James Inhofe°, FN. t►ird fon of the late sir James ibbetfon, and brother of Sir Henry Carr ibbctfon, of tl.a , place, Baronets. The ndldnefs of this young Getailernatia etrpottton, and engeging furetty of his manners, peculiarly fitted him for the dirties of religion, which prolclion ►e was fo well defigned to adorn. 7'O-MORROW. ...—. ... Stun riks es Moon riks 34 minutes after 4 I 6 minutes after 7I 26 minutes after r, MOH WATtR AT LONDON-8WI:0E l'O hIORROW Morals - 54 minutes after it Afternoon - a minutes artcr /3 To T. TAYI.OR, Surgeon, No. 9, New Eridee-ltreet, London kislitibargh, May a, rgoa. IN the flaring oft 794 I Vras aftlifted with a Yeffix. real Complaint, which I treated with imiiiierenee for fiv months; but was then obliged to apply to a regular Phyficiane who put a temporary !top to the virulence of the &Cede (by mercurial applications) for fame time ; bat rotting, in trite af all medicine and the advice of the srft Gentiesnon of the Faculty here, worfe and work far two years, I was redoced to a Rate &trail unparalleled and beyond dthripti on , being an entire Leer, and ulcerated front beta to ford.—My head, throat, mouth, mire, legs, arms, &e. have beefs aTtensately in dater ot bents* ing ureters; in Mort, I have had.from to to 3u eating ulcer: my body, and nearly totally deprived of right.—lt v.oold Le voluminous to particularize all my cafe—ftiffice it to fay, there ftetkr w at, or ever will be, one of a were dengeratit, or of more complicated nature. I oat long looked upon by my friends, and imagined rnyfelf,beyond all hopes df recovery ; and indeed, I. my then condirion, death was preferable to my atom than mil's:rabic Rate. In this dreadful 6tuatien did I drag a maser tniferable ceiftence, till Div' vt Peovsnetret threw in my way a newfpaper containing the cafe of a Mr. B. of Plymank—any friends read it, I could not..-1 font and procured Come of your LtAtt'S PATtNT Pitts, Which, by ufing front time to time, am now, and have long been, (after more dam four ' , earwig deferibable dirties), in as,good a Rate of health us ever I ea toyed ; as a proof of this, I bad a fine, thriving, healthy elands born to me a few months ago. In gratitude to Oar, aad IN hopes of rendering my fellow-creature fereice, I requelt you to paidlfti this , and you may at any time refer onions, who wiCh to be fatisf .11 of the truth of this, or further partktdare, to me or my friends, by letter or pesion. As few cafes for b2dnelg will ever emul mine, and none ex ceed it, I have from experience every region to aura mankind, that is, your Lawn se's tuts they will node hare, fpeady,farei and radical cure, for that molt drradrie Stage of the Venereal Metre, which I s aided—...a co a ria al ID LUISS.-1 am with gra titude Sir, your obliged bumble Invert. J. T. • I n(urrnauntable family reafons prevent Making my Aaron and addrefrosbUe, but creditable Perkins really wantinginfor. 'nation may alto be reterred to me and my Friends by Mrs. I. Clark, Ramfay-Cardens, Edinburgh. Prepared and Sold by the Sole Proprietor, Tunica, TAT.. to a, Member of the Royal C.ollege of Surgeons In London, at his houfe, No. 9, New Bridge-first; where he will give ad vice, without a km, to perform taking thefe Pills and vein an fwer patients letters, if poll paid, on the fame term., obferv ing in all cafes the molt Inviolable fecreey, no Perron's name of sale having been mentioned,but at their owe if:macular requelly by the Proprietor, during the courfe of more than 36 years, that he has had the condnaing of an exteave tale of the 'bore medicine, and the prattice arifing therefrom. They are alto fold, by his Appointment, for the convenient* of thofe living at a dinance, by Mr. Waite'', gout/OW.lm Fdinburgh ; Mr. Mentions, Printer, Glareow, wi am 'Or Mr. T. refers for his addrefs ; at the Perfumer's, Na 33, St. Pall-Mali ; Mr. Rnbettfoo sTardiest , /sio.to3, Oxford-fireet ; Mr. Dilborgush's No. 7, Fa-Rent-bin. nearly ornate the Monument; Bookklier, Nos. g, UMonsrow, Little Tower-hill; Mr. Canwell's, Dublin ; and by one Perron io every cafiderable town In Gent-Deltas ma Ireland, in Netts of only as. gel each, reeled tip with fall ind 'pain Directions, whereby Perrone of either Sex may rare ihemic:re, vritti cafe and tecrecy. I.t.e N. /UN : Preened for the Nevelt-tom hy jOi IN DANIEL (of Clanity•(i :tee) at the *tea Plitrtlirowtheriea,l ll o Carey-ilreet ; sod publithed try L/VEL KIeNT, (of Car• herhiry-t.eace, lAnthetS), at No T. Carey-nrra. and at el* Si •1•0 - Temple-Ear; to width OitaaB aar issai• ral lA . , he' the BDITOIII ITC roanctal ta be siblasted. That Rev. Mr& C. The The A 3/[r }'tor n• o. tLI