Star. — London, England, 1805-11-25 00:00:00

al;ly of the Brltlfh Empire, and confeiuently. I may a ( fume, the ILI, of Europe, does entirely depend. A eainft the tru h of the de viation of its rulers. I may challenge the moat daring fupporttr. th e ' , Went Government to produce one fmgle at in the liv,s ef either of thole trwiy great chandler, of the Doctor, which can entitle him to claim one particle of matt or confide tree. from the poblic, beyond the hounds and limits. within which I have encir cled their exploits On the Chancery Pleader.perha, s, I may have Sid too great a ftrefs; he is not of the fort confequence, though in a future letter I may, perhaps. point nut the mifchief, which the ints rrneddfirab of fuck a man, in matters out of the etinrfc of his pradlicc, may occafion. But with rapea t o Lord Hardwicke, it may be replied, that my challenge is unfair, hecaufe it is impoffible tnjuftify his having been appointed to the Government of Ireland b;• an y inftances of former political ability, as the acceptance Of his indent office was his foil eflay What! is he one of the tribe of the Hobart'', Wefintorelands, and Camden? Is he one of that Che, who have been lent over to us to be trained up here into po liticians. as they train the Surgeon's apprentices in the hufpitals, by Petting them Brft to bleed the pauper pa.icnts ? Is this a time for a continuation of fuels experiments ? The gift of Lord Ilardwicke to us, at fuch a period, cannot he compared to any thing rife than the prank of Falstaff at the battle of Shrewlbury, where the Knight banded over his pifro: to the Prince. For indeed, •!r, by the prefent to us of Lord Harelwieke that reticence has proved to us in a bloody troth which Falftaff Paid in a good ltintoured Flue's what will 'ids a ety." The nt:xt offerdive parts are contained in a fecond letter, likewire " Affairs of Irel.:nd." dated the 28th November, 1803, and occurs in the Regif t.r, page Bc4. . .. . " What I have now to touch upon molt he dcoe with a deli • este hand. I will confine myfelf to a hare narrative of fads, and will not prefurne to give any apilion. As loon as the Go vernm, nt had fully recovered its recoil, &ion, a commiffioo, di reeled to five of the judges, iffued For the trial of Mae rebels who had been at-react! for treafoo committed is the county and city of Dublin. This commilgon having Wiled while the Judges Wert! on the circuit, was filled up (and very properly filled up) with the names of the five fenior of thole judges who were then on the circuits, which were likely to terminate at the earlieft pe riod of time. Such was the rrafott given by Government for the particular fcledion of delft judges namr I in that commiflion, and it certainly was a gond reafen. In fame time after this commif fion had been fitting, it became neccifary to Me a new commit . - hon for the trial of rebels in the Wires of Antrim and Down. In the appointment of this fecund convoiffion, the principle which diredled the feledion iu the firlt was not adhered to. On the contrary, the junior Judge of the twelve was very ansioully cal led out, and placed in this new commiflion over the heads of a number of his Fenton. This, however, could not, and ,might not to have given cifenceto any of thole fenior Judges, becaufe what ever opinion of them the Government may have manifeftcd in tech an appointment, the opinion of the prefent Government upon t .1i a fubjedt (known to be influenced by motives very different il am general juftice) is too highly contemptible to have any effed upon any of the Learned Judges in the public mind. The stir ewnftance,therefore, was not at firft attended to. 'there is pnb- Whed in this city a Newfpaper called ' The Dublin journal. It is, in general, condudted with good fenfe, loyalty, and a regard to truth ; but in particular deviations It is known to be under the - controul and immediate direetion of Government. In that paper of the Goth of Odober a publication appeared, which purported to be a charge given by the junior Judge before alluded to to the Grand Jury of the county of Antrim. In this place, I beg now to declare, that I am far from attempting to affect, that the Lear ned Judge did pronounce any fuch charge; and when I (peak of his charge, I requeft you to underftand, I only mean the newfpa r publication : the Learned judge is made to tell th e Gr a nd per ry that, ' through the well timed efforts and strenuous exertions a wife and energetic Government, &c. fueh crimes as lately difgraced this country had been effedually checked.' if the Learned juilice dil make any filch affection, (which I am far from fuppofing) with what amazement the Grand Jury muff have received fuch a broadlide, poured upon the troth of the fadt, I cannot. as I was cwt prefent, know; but I can very well Imagine what the feelings of twenty-three well informed Gentle men mull have been. Their raped and a thorough knowledge of their duty. would neceffarily keep them client. But though men remain Lunt under the proper awe and contrtmlof a Court of Jultice. their language only becomes more amnions when that 'varmint is taken of, and they meet together in private eon- The Libel then proceeds, page 806, in the fol lowing form : " But, Sir, fuggeftion does not flop here. Men aft, bow could (if the Learned Justice did make any fuck afTertion) the Learned Justice be led to give credit to a pofition which contradids the evidence of the fenfes of every man in the kingdom, who was prefent at, or knew any Wog of the tranfadion ? How could a Learned Judge be fuppof, do affect that which no man in the kingdom would afkrt, uul she had tome reafons of the fame na ture as thale which pouted ou Mr.Marfdets'e Attorney General, on the trial tor high treafon, to erten fomething of the fame kind? B".en, Sir, couple the extra diartry plaits of the Learned Jullice from amongft his fellows„ with the ext..mrdiawy opti a attri • bated t" him in a Government newfparrr, and they afk, if hr made that aff, rtion, where did he get his infrrmation ? Was be ever in Mr. Matfden's audience room finer the right of the 23d td . July? What paired there? What were the prrelifpoling cauh.s which induced Government to pea parli.thriy that Learned Juitice ? Could Government have forefeen (and if In, by what faculty) that the Learned Jullice would have given an inftruelion to the Grand Jury fo very ufeful and fa very grateful to the Go vernment ? What night telefeope could have been applied to the eye of Mr. Madden, which through the dark womb of things un born, could have enabhd him to perceive through this little future ftar of praife,fpringing front the ct cative lips of the 1. earned Jollier? Here, Sir, decorum towards you and towards the public inclines MIL to he fluent as to other, and perhaps fironL,er obfervotious. But may. I believe, add what men alto fay that if it were poiShle, ermined robe of the nualt awfol attribute of his Maj city. ,uld have been wrapped round the ;AS of Marillen, in order fcreen them from public difgrace, we might then look for atm - but not left fatal end to our liberties, and to .ur Cooflitu than that which rebellion or invafion could prtaiuce. And tit, they fay, that except as to momentary eit..els, rebellion mho!, might be viewed with it.diii . erence, if it can be fop• that the Rained hands of a Emu) cletk had Men walhcal iu 'try fountain of jolt ice." 'le letter titer goes on, in page BoR, to make a Ivantageous compat ifon between Lind Rtdeldale, relent Lord Chancellor of Irelmid, and Lord .on mead of calling him to the nation which he fo ably filled, piesfed his Maier, y rn l.lef thetVeftern neighbours of Cam. (who certainly owe the lumen and warm-hearted pi incipa , ill-will), with Lord Kenyon for a Chanecllor, I can very :once lye what Lord Kenyon. in fuch a lunation, would have and clfo wirit he would not have dune. 1 emu a Lire MO* of nature, or from a rare precifion of Cif knowirdsc, Lord Kenyon world have neled with referve and circumfpeCtitor. on his arrival hi a country, with the moral quality of the inhabitants of which, and se, , h their yerrnns, manners. and individual charac " and cotthections, he mutt have been utterly unacquainted. In a country, torn with donieftic fcslitten and treafoa, threat , with toreign invafion, and actiog, hoer: the Uyion, winder an ttricd Conttitution, if Liolor Addington had required that Lord nyon %toil(' Airre a l'ambridgeChiee in all hid councils, • Kenyon would s loon, at the defire of I.ord at. Vinc e nt, o• , ,lertakett to pilot a line of hank ihm through the Needles. .:ulirly, the interri.y of lord Kenyon d. oulli have trunk inch an undeitaking, it a entiel:ion be,n addled to it, that in. Nobleman or tionaleman poi died an" rank, alone, •ontierition in the country, upon any account. fnouhl be con- Hid pride would hava f i rtimedi at the uthi.rtaking, if e..re told that a Cambridgefhi.e Fad and hinifelf, in the . of tiovernment, a clerk in the Secretary d and a Coat• of lawyr r., without pfaiCC4l lollies, political inforisiwien t . or ovrable conneetion>, were to lie joined as affdikos, and to he only afftiford—Lord Kewy on's pride and integrity would hare Joined in preveming hint front being hirrifet the inftruarcnt traducing tech nom into aCaki.ct of Goer- mrient.• If any one could be found, of whom a youv hut unhappy vici.m of the y offended laws of his country iu the moment or M., con :atoll and fentence, uttered the following mot:l.l.hr. • that wive, thorn my rather motiritliet!'. he it was, fawn whine principles and wirOli now by their &eels drag me to my grave, and . id. who is now brought forward as my profecutor, and who, an unheard of eitereile of prerogative, has wantonly !Abed, with tpeech to evidence, the dying fon of his former friend, when • dying fon had produced no evidence, had made no defence, the contrary had acknowledged the eine, and had futo .,to hid faX • Lord Kenyon would 2aae turtmj wita hoed 1 , me t e0 .1 :5 h 7 e r.: 5 1 i l de e e n cl : 1 il may. I believ , , t i ' ' the ermined z ' ' mould have be .. i! to fcreen them ther, but not I lion, than that in truth, they 1 , and invalloi; RI 0 1 pofed that tin the I'm fount: • The lette difAdvantal] the prefent Kenyon : " Inflead o , lead it ' , Wed bricus (who c. ' lity PO ill-will Well contrive done, and chi deity of natut Kenyon wont arriv4l in A C which, and v I . 1 • ten and coot. Inch a Coitalr ened with toi . I • untried cone '' Kenyan thou .. • 3..trt: Kenyou n-ave 1.-Icrta , ! 4 ' .::icul aly. 1 •,.t.tuch an I is . nil, Is:ubit or mint... Clio: . I Inhc.i. Hi~ b, Werc Col Cirr of tiov. f pie of lawy< holm:I - A/c c • the only affet itoth joined i t ot introducin .man could b. i juftly ofkndc vidtion and I • whom my rat j.. .U, iiii:;cs, %v $ e it w. whit 1 -1” an Unite:a a tioxch to el ' that dying fa l lint on the cm wiittteto hid ror from fuch a fcent, to wfileh,altliough guilt was in one part to be punifhed, yct in the whole drams juttice was confounded, hu. inanity outraged, and Liyalty intuited." The Lilt paflage on the record was on the follow. jog terms : "it was fold of Lord Kenyon, that he loved money—if fo, he loved his own money only. an dl not the money of any other man. Lord Kenyon there ore. a. Chance.!lnc, never would have made any rule,or order, by the ((fed. of which. the Seercta.y of a Matter f the Rolls would be deprived of all fees, for the purpofc of throwing all thofe fees into the hands of the Secretary to the Chancellor, the better to enable that Secretary to difchaFge the penfiou of tome unknown annuitant on his official profits." The Counfel for the Profecution having doled their cafe on behalf of the Crown, - - Mr. ADAM commenced a molt able deferee for the :geared Judge, whom he defcribed as a gentleman who had paffed a long life in the honourable exer cife of thofe important duties, demanded by the high flotation of public truft and confidence he had held. Afflictive, indeed, would it be to fuch a man, wlinfe whole time and attention had been devoted to the (import of the Government and ConQitution of the coontry, and the laws, in the adminihration of which he had been fo materially concerned, to have it recor ded of him that he had been guilty of fo malevolent an aa, as that of fending into the world an anony mous libel, to deffrov the fame of the immediate re prefentative of the king, vilify the firft Law Officer of the country, reflee upon the honour_ and charac ter of a brother Judge, and by the . general fenpe• and tendency of the publication, excite a fpirit of difenntent and difaffeeion to his Majefly's Govern. menu, the eminent perfnns engulfed by him with the higher funftions of the State. Truly had it been Rated by the Attorney General, that no one could contend the publication was not a libel ; he admitted it was a libel of the tuna fcandalous defcription—it was not the with of the Defendant to deny that it had that charaeler—but in proportion as it was ma• licious and malignant, it was the duty of the Jury not to convict a man of having written it without the cleareß and moft unequivocal proof legally brought forward that he was beyond dtfpnte the author.— The queftion of his criminality would confequently depend upon the comparative dependence to be plac ed on the teftimony of the witneffes. If the Crown had produced four witnelfes, who fpeaking only from their knowledge of the Defendant's hand writ ing, five or fix years ago, conceived that the mann fcript was written by him, he thould, in oppofition to their teftimony, produce more than an equal number of witneffes who had been the intimate friends of the Defendant during the whole of his life up to the prefent Moment, and who were as well acquainted with the charaeer of his hand writing as with his features. There perfons would hate that the libel, inftead of being the production of the Defendant's pen, had not the leaft refemblance to his manner of writing. The proof then would be equally balanced —and as it was the firft principle of jutlice not to prefume guilt where innocence was equally proba ble, fo he united the Jury would take into their con fideration the charafter and long habits of life of the Defendant, and the utter impoffibility of his being capable of publithing Co defamatory a libel, and in clineto that decifion which would reftore the Defen dant to that rank in fociety which he enjoyed before he was the objet of this accufatiun. Sir Henry Jebb was the tint witnefs examined.— He Rated. that he had been intimately acquainted with the Defendant for the 'aft thirty years, and due ing the greater part of that time was equally well acquainted with his hand writing, as with the features of his face. Being (hewn the papers in queftion, he Rated that the former of the two letters, bearing date the 28th of Oaober, 1803, was, in fume degree Similar to the hand writing of the efendant when fuperficially viewed, but, when more rearrowlyinfpec ted by any perfon fo well acquainted with it as the witnefs was, it would be eafily difcovered not to be his hand wilting. The other letter, bearing date the 29th November, he thought had no Similitude whatever to the writing of the Defendant. On his crofs examination, the witnefs raid that he had lately been given to underhand, that there were pew plc who could fo exaely imitate the hand writing of the Defendant, that the real writing could not be dillingnithed from the counterfeit. About a month ago the Defendant ogled at the witnefi's houfe, ac companied by another gentleman, and informed him of this circumilance. He alto told him that a young man who could imitate his handwriting to perteeion had cuntefled that he was author of the publication attributed to the Defendant in the prefent indiEt ment ; and that he was alone prevented from divulg ing the ti eret left it Should affect his father, who held a Situation under Government. In proof of the affertion that this perfint could write it . fuch a man ner as to render it impoffibie to dillinguith between it and the Defendant's hand writing, the Defendant proptiled that the witnefs Should mark feveral Sheets of blank paper, and of brieves addreffed to the De fendant, which the other gentleman lhnuld take to the perfon alluded to, on which he Should write, while the Defendant remained in company with the witnefs. This was accordingly done, and in about three hours the gentleman returned with the (Ileac and brieves, written upon in Such a manner as made it impotlible for the witnefs to dillinguiflt them from the hand writing of the Defendant. The name of the perfon who wrote thete (fleets the Defendant ne ver communicated to the witnefs, nor did the witnefs know it. The name of the gentleman who carried out and brought back the Sheets was 'Carr, but he was not here as a witnefs. Being interrogated by Lord Ellenhorough, it there might not be fume tie felon in the btilinels, it being far more practicable to imitate the initials of the witnefs which he had put on the Sheets than to fill them up entirely with writing, refembling that of the Defendant? the witnefs de clared that he had no doubt the Sheets brought back to him were the fame which when blank he had marked with his initials. Dr. Francis Hodgkinfon, Senior Fellow of the Univerlity of Dublin, and brother-in-law to the de fendant, whom he had known intimately far upwards of zo years, deprfed, that he did not believe the let ter fira (hewn to him, dated aBth October, twbe the hand-writing of the defendant. The other letter was lo'totally different, that he had no hefitation in fay ing it was not his hand.writing.—Crofs examined— He laid he had particularly remarked the words _mad andfhead, though he confeffed he had heard it remarked in public, that the fpelling of thefe words without the letter 6 pointed out the defendant as the author. He alto acknowledged, that feveral pieces of writing had been (hewn to him, not written, as he was informed, by the defendant, but fo like to the defendant's writing, that the witnefs would have been unable to diftinguifb the difference. Mr. Archdale raid, he had known the defendant for 4 or 15 years, and had been clerk to Mr. Wal ler, one of the witneffes for the profecution, during the greater part of that time, during which period his opportunity of tieing and of judging of the de Pendant's hand-writing had been much greater than Mr. Waller's could be. In his opinion the letters . (hewn him were not the hand writing of the defendant. Of that he had no doubt. The latter of the two papers had not the fmalleft fimilitnde to the hand writing of the defendant. On his crofs examination. the witnefs Paid that he had feen imitations of the defendant's writing, fo like, that he could not have pofitively laid whe ther they were written by him or not. He had leen fuch written at a Mr. Fleming's, in Smock Alley, Dublin, about a month fine. 'the perfcn whom he law write fo like the defendant, he did Hot know, but he went by the name of Fleming. Fleming was on the door. The witnefs knew nothing of him good, bad, or indifferent. Mr. Giffard called on the witnefs at his houfe in Cup-ftreet, and carried him to the lunge of Fleming. He did not know much of Gif fard, but believed he was a Barrilter. The witnefs was afraid of no man, and therefore would not refufe to accompany any man, even a itranger, to any place to which he might be a(ked to go. John Giffard Paid he had known the Defendant up wards of thirty years, and knew his writing well.— He believed the firft letter (hewn him not to be of the Defendant's hand writing. The fec.ind, he was convinced, was not. On his crofs-examination, the witnefs Rated that he had held a place under the re venue, from which he had been removed by Lord Hard wicke for being a Proteftant, • and as Lord Hardwicke himfelf acknowledged, it was for pre. fenting a petition to the King, praying of him to pre terve the Country and Conilitution. He Rated that he was acquainted with a perfon of the name of Arch. dale ; alfo with one of the name of Mitchell, who had been Lord Mayor of Dublin, and, though not inti mately, with a young man of that name who had fucceeded him in bufinefs. The younger Fleming, he reconciled, did write fomething like the Defen dant. He writes a (lathing hand. Re-examined for the Defendant. He knew the elder Fleming, he be ing Lord Mayor of Dublin while the witnefs ferved the ottee of Sheriff. Daniel Cafeidy, who Rated himfelf to be an apo: :thecary refiding in England, raid that he had known the Defendant from his earlieft youth, and had uni &linty correfponded with bim. There was fume refemblance betvieen the hand writing of the Defen dant and the letter firft Shewa him, dated in 06tober —but hardly any between the Defendant's hand writing and the fecond letter—he did not think the former of the two letters was written by the Defen dant. He was certain the latter was not. All of thefe witnefres reprefented the Defendant as writing a more diffufe, larger and freer hand than that in which the letters were written, though all of them agreed that the former letter was more freely written and more like the writing of the Defendant than the other. The ATTORNEY GENERAL then addrefledThe Jury. Grofs and unbecoming as he had formerly Rated, and, as he was convinced, the Jury muff be fatisfied, the libel was, in any man, but more particularly in a Judge, it would be impoflible fir them, or for any man who had heard the tenor of the defence attempt ed to be fet up, not to declare that it was infinitely more difgraceful, and inflicted a deeper Ram on the charader of the defendant, than the libel, malignant and mifehievous as it unqu e Ilionably waNcouldpoaly have done. He then proceeded to point out the con tradidory nature of the defence let up, by which it was alledged that a perfon who, from prudential mo rives. durtl not avow himielf, but who wrote a hand exactly fimilar to the Defendant, was the author of the publication in queflion ; and the pofitive tefli• mony of the witneffes in defcribing the letters in quer tion written, as the Defendant would infinuate, by ,his very perfon whore hand could not be dißinguifh ed from the Defendant's, as being altogether ditlimi lar from his hand writing. Lord Eeettraoaouc a, on proceeding to recapitu late the evidence to the Jury, obferved, that in this cafe there were but two queßions for their confidera ration ; the one, whether the publication Rated in the indictment was or was not a libel? and if it was, then the other queflion would be, whether the tranfmif lion and procuration of its publication by the Defen dant, was proved to their fatisfaftion I With re fped to the &ft quellion, it was not denied, nor any attempt made to difprove the fad. On the contrary, the publication was fully acknowledged by the De fendant's Counfel, as a libel on Lord Hardwicke, the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, and the Reprefentative of his Sovereign, Rating him as only fit to be a feeder of fheep ; a libel upon the Under Secretary of State, who aided the meafures of Lord Hardwicke's Go vet mem. accufing him of the foul crime of prole& ing affaffins and peculators, and endeavonting to ex mire a corrupt influence over a Judge of the land ; a libel upon the Lord High Chancellor of Ireland, a Privy Counfellor, and a Member *lithe Ira Govern ment, charging him with corrupt proftitution of the fulls committed to his charge ; and, by an invidious contrail of his condo& with what would have been Lord Kenyon's, had he filled :he Ration, obvtotifly adopting a pretext for conveying a Rill Rronger flan der upon the charatler and conduit of the Lord- Chancellor ; and, laltly, a libel on the Judge Mince% charging him as guilty of a corrupt collufion with the Under Secretary of State : the whole together amounting to a libel of fuck complicated and malici ous guilt, as had an obvious tendency to produce that effect which it called for in words, namely, to fink into difrepnte and contempt the Government in Ire land, and to feparate from it the loyalty, the confi dence, and the fupport of his Majeßy's fubjeds in that part of the United Kingdom. If Each a libel could come with inveterate malignity through ordi nary hands; from thofe of a Judge of the land, bound by every tie of loyalty, of duty, and decorum, to fupport his Majelky's Government, and thofe laws of • The affair here alluded to our Readers will remember. Mr Giffard wag very adive in the oppolition made in the Corporation of Dublin to the Catholic Petition. Lord Hardwicke was deft ly= that ryovernmeat should not be confidered as influencing the oppofition made to the fair dirculkon of the qatition. Mr. Giffard having adopted a line of contlua which Lord Hardwicke did cot approve, was wooved on that account, as was laid, from a lu crat ive office. Of the clad merits, and whale details of the twit*. adios Jiludetito, we areasaintaxasal. which he was the confidential adininifirator, lt . s- Inutt come with almoll an incalculable degree of atg4,tv a . don. The libel in the pre.rent cafe bore. in his Lord lhip's mind, no fort of atilmil9tion with the car ef the (even Bilhops to which it had ben compared: their ad was no more than a flint. loyal, and coniti- . tutional remonarance to the Perfonage to whom it was addreffed, in fupport of their privilezes, and of that religion over which they were enlkd to prefide. It never appeared at the time but in the written form in which it was prefented, nor was it publithed in any other way, than by placing it in the hands of the Ro'al Perfonage to whom it was direfted. It could not then bear any comparifon whatever, in magni tude or malignity, with this libel, which was calcu lated to abufe his Majefly's Government in Ireland' by the Could' Hander—to feparate finm it the confi dence, the loyalty, and fupport of the people. Ir.' his Lordfliip's m:nd, there was, in the tedimony* before the Court this day, evidence fit to go to a• Jury for their conlideration and inference, whethei" or not they were convinced in their cuncciences,Crnsr' that evidence, that the tranfmitii.:n and procuratior. of the publication of this libel, was brought home tc the Defendant? His Lordlhip then ptnceeded to re-' capitulate the whole nt the yvir! r,:e, with fuitable comments in his progrefs. After retiring for upwards of five minutes, the Jury returned is ith a vervlift of—Guilty. The Court was uncommonly cr owded during the • whole of the day. the whole teats behind the Bar being occupied by Counfet. The Trial commenced at ten o'cl , sek in the mor ning, and did not finilh till pall eigbt o'clock at night. to iri WATER AT LONDON-BRIDGE TO•MORROQ. Morning . Lakensoom A CERTAIN CURE FOR CORNS INFALLIBLE GERMAN C 4: RN-PLAISTER. THE PROPRIETOR 41f this molt excellent REMEDV is fo certain of its Efficacy having never faikA, in a variety of Cafes, agrees, if it does not eradicate the Corn, root and branch, TO arruan Tilt +to var. And he begs leavn to add, that it has infinitely the advantage of the numberieft inns. cation+ Ointments, Salves, &c. as many hundreds of afflidltd per+ fans can teftify, among wn= are fame of the firft charades% to this kingdom. Sold Whokfale and Retail by T.Axtell, No. 1, Finch-lane, near the Royal Exchange; and alto by Mr. Day, No. 7, Tavißoek itreet ; Mr. Wilfon, No. 39, St. Janices-itreet; Mr. Hilder, No. 21, Pall-Mall; Mr. Ward, No. 324, Holborn; &adiabatic an! Co. No. rso, Ocfnrd-ftreet. At Britt' 01, by Mr. Bin and Mr. Sheppard, Bookfellers Bath, By Hazard, bookfeller, and %Wright, perfumes. Edinburgh, by Batter, South Bridge. Portfea and Gofport, Mr. Harding's. Liverpool, by Mr. Gore, printer,und Mr. Joues,bositfeller. Portfmouth, Mr. Motley, bookfeller. And by molt of the Venders of Medicines in England. NERVOUS DEBILITY. ^ The LORD hath caged Medicines to grow out of the earth• and he that is wile will not abhor them; for with loch doth her heal men, and take away their pain.'--FceLlxxxviii. 4. 7. ` CORDIAL BALM OF GILEAD. THIS Cordial has been uncommonly fberefsiel with young people, who have the appearance and air of old age; who are pale, effeminate, benumbed, (tepid, and even itnbe• cite ; whore bodies are become bent, whore legs are no longer able to carry them ; who have an utter diltalle for every thing, and are totally incapacitated. Where the Roma h frequently &foci. dered, the body is weakened ; pak-scfs, bodily decay, and entail anon faceted, and the eyes fink into the head. The virtues of the CORDIAL Mast of OUR AV are daily demonftrated, in eradi cating the worft and molt dangerous fymptoms of nervous debi lity ; and nothing has tended fo much to eltablifit the Paine of this medicine, as its certain fuceefs in thofe complaints Which hart their roots fo deep in the conititunoo, and are fo bate the hap. pinch of mankind. The lady of John jackfon, Efq. of Cattle-Carbery, labiate, Ireland, was two years and a half completely bed-r4dca, and not able, from her great wesknefs, to eat, driuk. or digit any thing. till the 11123 advifed by a friend to try the truly celebrated Cordial Balm of Gilead, nine bottles of which has had fo extraordinary and happy au effed, that the is now, though at the age of 63 yearn. able to walk out and exacife herfelf, being molt perfectly rem elted, to the furprifeand aftonithment of all her neighbours ; confederation of which, and in juilice to the medicine, the requees this may be made public. Jame/ Adkins, mailer of the John and Henry. Iphvich, was cured three years ago, by the Cordial Balm of Gilmd, of x emu knee, indigeftion, and aithma, attended with retching and ficknefis which he had laboured under a long time, and haa remained E.r• laity well ever fine. James Vaughan, Efq, late Banker, Bristol, acknowledges with gratitude that he received infinite benefit from (even bottles of the Cordial Balm of Gilead; having been thereby reftored from an afthma, cough, violent wheezing of the lungs, ftrong hypochon driac. kneads of fpirits, great relaxation, ereaknefsirf body. reftlefs nights, and to comfortable dreams, all which or..M him very much ; lie is now luity,ttrongand bearty,and enjoys better health than be has caper:cunt:ll for thefe gg years pelt told in London by Mrs. Mathews, tB, Strand ; Dicey and Sut ton, Bow Church-yard; Bacon, sso. 0 aforddreet ; Pidding,76, Ox ford. ilrcet, oppate the Pantheon; Butler, 4, Cheapfide Barclay and Son, fleet market; Shaw and Edwards, 66, St. Paul's Church yard; Howard and Evans, Long Lane,Weit-Smithfieldi and par ticularly at the following phices,viz. Drift!, Mrs.Shkreliff Lynn Pigge Bath, Hazard hlanChelter, Staines Berwiek,Carr " Margate. Sliver Bafing& ke, Hulbert Melanin, Hoare Bradford, Wilts, Hopkins Maidenhead, &men Bridport, Rob erts Malmlbsiry, Lea Bridgwater, Poole Mannlegtree, Wilkinfon Bewdley, Prattington ' Notti3gbani, Burbage & Stret Mader Stephens ton firentfoin, Norbury Neweale upon Tyne,Hutelda Beaminfter, Hiue foe raid Co. : • - Sinus?, Waltham, lents*. Norwich, Steyenfise Baintree, Shearcrott Newport, the of Wight, Amin Coventry, Merrideer . Nantwich, Smilax Catitertury, Briftow Ofweftry, Edwards Cantor, Booth Pertrtch, Soulby Chariton, Etberingtoo Po-tfea, J cod W. Buckland Cambridge, Hodfou POTIfIDOLIIb, Sharpe Chepflow, Morris Piyinauth, Nettleton Clapham, Baum Plymnath Dock ,Hothind• Dover, Neales Richmanfworth, Paden Dunitable, Quccalborough Kochtord, Wade Dudley, Harding Sheffield, Pierlon Deptford. Davies Stamford?, Miners 224 " Dercham, Barker Szafford, Miners Dublin, No. 6, College Green, Shrewfbury, Wood Dugdale, Colwell, Bull Skarbounr, Gqadi y and Ca Edinburgh, A. Smith, North Sarmundham, Nigut Bridge Southamp , on. Baker. Exeter, Trewrnan and Son SeiltUry,Collins' Ply, Bratkenbury Shaftfbury, Adams Prose, Haffail Saffron. Walden, Paine Ginuceiter, Jones *tourbridge, Rondo* Griport, Harding Shepton Mallet, Carey Gainthorough, Towne Storlt , no, Chrlitopiter &Inure Greenwich, Statue Tat itt,lt, Rowe Glafgow, Angus hilfottald Twieketabam, Mortimer Hull, J. Radford Toribr.dre Vs^ells,Koight llorucattle, Weir Trowbridge, Ching Harnmerimith, Roberts 11 , toarttr, blades Henley on Thames. Norton Whitby, Yeoman Hanley, Albutt and Soa W! itehaven, Croftwaite And a the Venders of Patent Moll: rocs in th, United Kingdom A faring of cps. may be had buparehafing the family Bottle, at 331. which contain four of the Half guinea bottles. Dr Solomon may be cor.lulted by letter (port paid) addreffed to Wm at Gilead Houle, near Liverpool, inclining fdsufual Fee of Half-a -guinea. LONDON: Printed and PnbEfbed by LEVEL KENT (of Can terbury-osec. Lambeth), lathe STAR OtriCt, No. I. Cate/ Amt. Palliated alto it the Sras Ory s Tesple-Bar. 1