Star. — London, England, 1828-05-22 00:00:00

111, .~ b. •••ilfiliPlN. Plonildtentiaries to treat andlagree concerning a tem pKafy renewal of the said Article, that is to say— His Majesty thp King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain aMk Ireland. the Right Hon. Charles Grant, a Member of his said Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council. a Member of Parliament, and Vice Pre• sident of the Committee of Privy Council for Affairs of Trade and Foreign Plantations; and Henry Unwin Addington, Esq.— And the President of the United States of America, Albert Gallatin, their Envoy Extraordinary and Minis ter Plenipotentiary to his Britannic Majesty: Who, after having communicated to each other their respective full powers, found to be in due and proper form, have agreed upon and concluded the following articles: ART. 1.--All the provisions of the third Article of the Conven:ion concluded between his Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the United States of America, on the 2001 October, 1818, shall be and are hereby further indefinitely ex tended and continued in force in the same manner as if all the provisions of the said Articles were herein spe cifically recited. ART. 11.—It shall be competent, however, to either of the contracting parties, in case either should think fit at any time after the 20th of Octber, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve months to the other contracting party, to annul and abrogate this Convention; and it shall, in such case, be accordingly entirely annulled and abrogated, after the expiration of the said term of notice. Aar. 111. Nothing contained in this Convention, or in the third Article of the Convention of the 20th of October, 1818, hereby continued in force. shall be con .strued to impair, or in any manner affect, the claims which either of the Contracting Parties may have to any part of the country westward of the Stoney or R.ocky Mountains. Aar. IV. The present Convention shall be ratified, and the Ratifications shall be exc4anged.in nine months, or sooner, if possible. In witness whereof, the respective Plenipotentiaries have signed the name, and have affixed thereto the seals of their aims. Done at Lanka, the 6th day of August, in the year of our Lord 1127. (L.S) CHARLES GRANT. (L.S.) HENRY UNWIN ADDINGTON. (LE) ALBERT GALLATIN. CONVENTION OF COMMERCE BETWEEN HIS MAJ OF ESTY AND THE UNITED STATES AMERICA. (Signed at London, Aorta 6, 1827.) His Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the President of the United States of America, being desirous of continuing in force the existing commercial regulations between the two countries, which are contained in the Convention con cluded between them on the 3d of July,lBls, and further renewed by the Fourth Article of the Convention of the 20th of October, 1818, have, for that purpose, named their respective Plenipotentiaries, that is to say— His Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Right Hon. Charles Grant, a Member of his said Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council, a Member of Pailiament, and Vice Pre ' silent of the Committee of Privy Council for Affairs of Trade and Foreign Plantations; and Henry Unwin .Addington, Esquire— And the President of the United States of America, Albeit Gallatin, their Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to his Britannic Majesty : Who, after having communicated to each other their respective full powers, found to be in due and proper form, have agreed upon and concluded the following Articles: Aar. the provisions of the Convention con cluded between his Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the United Suites of America, on the 3d of July 1815, and further continued for the term of ten years, by the fourth Article of the Convention of the 20th of October 1818, with the exception therein contained as to St. Helena, are hereby further indefinitely, and without the said exception. ex tended and continued in force, from the Gate of the ex piration of the said ten years, in the same manner as if all the provisions of the said Convention of the 3d of July 1815 were herein specifically recited. Aar. shall be competent, hOwever, to either of the Contracting Parties, in case either should think fit, at any time atter the expiration of the said ten years —that is, after the 20th of October 1828—on giving due notice of twelve ttionibs to the other Contracting Party. to annul and abrogate this Convention ; and it shad. in such case, be accordingly entirely annulled and abrogated, after the expiration of the said term of notice. Aar. ILL—The present Convention shall be ratified, and the ratifications shall be exchanged in nine months, or sooner if possible. la witness whereof the respective Plenipotentiaries • have signed the same, and have affixed thereto the seals of their arms. Done at London. the 6th day of August, In the boar Of Air Loin ma. (t.. 5.) CHA. GRANT. (L.S.) HENRY UN WIN ADDINGTON. (L.S.. ALBERT GALLATIN. CONVENTION arivreas HIS MAJESTY AND rim UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RELATIVE TO THE REFERENCE TO ARBITRATION. OF THE DISPUTED POINTS UNDER THE FIFTH ARTICLE OF THE TREATY OF GHENT. (Signed at Loadtm, September 29, 18271 Whereas it is provided by the fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, that in case the Commissioners 1,- pointed under that Article for the settlement of the boundary line therein described should not be able to agree upon such boundary line, the Report or Reports 1 of those Commissioners, stn ' the points on which they bad differed should be su itted to some fritodly tia rlie Sovereign or State; and that decision given by such Sovereign or State on snob points of different', should be considered by the contracting parties as 6atil and conclusive. That case having now arisen, and it having therefore become expedient to proceed to and regulate the reference as . above described, his Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and , Ireland, and the United States 'of America, boa foe, that purpose named theirPtenipotentiaries, that is to sitlf, His Majesty, on his pan, has appointed the Right Hon. Chalks Grant, a Member of Parliament, a Mem ber of his said 51ajesty'stsoit Hononrable Privy Coun cil, and President of the Committee of the Privy Conn-, eel for Affairs of Trade and Foreign Plantations; and' Henry tinsel's Addington. Esq : And the President of the United States has appointed Albert Gallatin, Dom Envoy Est/Stirdinary and Minis. 1 ter tlenipotentially at the Court d his Britannic Ma jeS 7 :—• Wbo, after billing exchanged their respective full powers, found to be in due and proper form, have agreed to sad concluded the following Articles: Alegicaa Id—lAis assreed that the points of difference ingeb have asi sea la the Sciagillebt of the boundary Ghent, shall de scribed in the fifth Art icle of the Treaty of G between the Blitish and American dominir scrns, as de- peereferred, provided, to some friendly &ve ,ishall be invited to investigate, and igno State, as s w h h er o ein sna ke a decision upon such p oints of diff erence. t The two Contracting Powers engage to proceed in concert to the choice of such friendly Sovereign or State as soon as the ratifications of this Convention shall have been exchanged, and to use their best endeavours to obtain a decision, it practicable, within two years after the arbiter shall have signified'his intention to act as such. AnT.ll.—The Reports and documents thereunto an nexed, of the Commissioners appointed to carry into execution the fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, being so voluminous and complicated as to render it improba ble that any Sovereign or State should be willing or able to undertake the office of investigating and arbitrating upon them, it is hereby agreed to substitute for those Reports new and sepatate statements of the respective cases, severally drawn up by each of the Contracting Parties, in such form and terms as each may think fit. The said statements, when prepated, shall be mutually communicated to each other by the Contracting Parties; that is to say, by Great Britain to the Minister or Charge d'Affaires of the United States at London, and by the United States to his Britannic Majesty's Minister or Charge d'Affaires at Washington, within 15 months after the exchange of the ratifications of the present Convention. After such communication shall have taken place, such party shall have the power of drawing up a se cond and definitive statement, if it thinks fit so to do, in reply to the statement of the other party so commu nicated, which definitive statements shall also be mu• tually communicated in she same manner as aforesaid, to each other, by the Contracting Parties, Olhia 21 months after the exchange of the ratificatieli of the present Convention. Any. 111.—Each of the Contracting Pd ies shall, within nine months after the exchange of ratifications of this Convention, communicate to the other, in the same manner as aforesaid, all the evidence intended to be brought in support of its claim, beyond that which is contained in the Reports of the Commissioners, or papers thereunto annexed, and other written documents laid before the Commission under the sth Article of the Treaty of Ghent. Each of the Contracting Parties shall be bound, on the application of the other party, made within six months atter the exchange of the ratifications of this Convention, to give authentic copies of such indivi dually specified acts of a public nature relating to the territory in question, intended to be laid as evidence before the arbiter, as have been issued under the autho rity, or are in the exclusive possession of each party. No maps, surveys, or topographical evidence of any description, shall be adduced by either party beyond that which is hereinafter stipulated ; nor shall any fresh evidence of any description be adduced or adverted to by either party, other than that mutually communi cated or applied for, as aforesaid. Each party shall have full power to incorporate in or annex to, either its first or second statement, any portion of the Reports of the Commissioners, or papers there unto annexed, and other written documents laid before the Commission under the filth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, or of the other evidence' mutually commune- • 1 cared or applied for, as above provided, which it may think fit. Aar. IV.—The map called Mitchell's Map, by which the framers of the Treaty of -1783 are acknowledged to have regulated their joint and official proceedings, and the map A, which has been agreed on by the con. muting parties as a delineation of the water courses, and of the boundary lines in reference to the said water courses as contended for by each party respectively, an wh ch has accordingly been signed by the above named Plenipotentiaries at the same time with the Convention, shall be annexed to the statements of the contracting parties, and be the only maps that shall be considered as evidence, mutually acknowledged by the contracting parties, of the topography of the country. It shall, however, be lawful for either party to annex to its respective first statement, for the purposes of ge• neral illustration, any of the maps, surveys, or to. pographical delineations which were filed with the Commissioners under the fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, any engraved map heretofore published, and also a transcript or the above mentioned map A, or of a section thereof, in which transcript each party ieraykey down the highlands or other features of the country, as ii shall think fit, the water courses and the boundary lines, as claimed by each party, remaining as laid down' in the said map A. But this transcript, as well as all the other maps. sump, or topographical delineations, other than the snap A, and Mitchell!' Map, intended to be thus an.. need by either party to the respective statements, shall be communicated to.the other party in the same mariner as aforesaid, within nine months after the exchange of the ratifications of this Convention, and shall be sub ject to such objections and observations as the other Contracting Party may deem it expedient to make thereto, and shall annex to his first statement, either in the margin of such transcript, map or maps, or otherwise. Are. V. All the statements, papers, maps, and do cuments abovementioned, and which shall have been mutually communicated as aforesaid, shall, without any eddition, subtraction, or alteration whatsoever, be jointly and simultaneously delivered in to the arbi trating Sovereign or State within two years after the exchange of ratifications of this Convention, unless the arbiter should not, within that time, have consented to, act as such ; in which case all the said statements, papers, maps, and documents, shall be laid before him' within six months after the time when he shall have consented so to act. No other statements, papers, maps, or documents, shall ever be laid before the arbiter, except as hereinafter provided. ART. Vl.—ln order to facilitate the attainment of a just and sound decision on the part et the arbiter, it is agreed that, in case the said arbiter should desire further elucidation or evidence, in regard to any specific point contained in any of the,said statements submitted to him, the requisition , fee such elucidation or evidence shall be simultaneouslyveade to both parties, who shall thereupon be permitted to bring further evidence, if re quired, and to make each a written reply to the specific • s submitted by the said arbiter, but no further; ' such evidence and replies shall be immediately communicated by each party to the other. And in caselhe arbiter should find the topographi cal evidence laid, as aforesaid, before him, insufficient tos the purposes of a sound and just decision, he shall h ave t he power of ordering additional surveys to be made of any portioes of the disputed boundary line of territory, as he may think fit ; which surveys shall be made at the joint expease of the Contracting Parties, and be considered as conclusive by them. ART. vg. The decision of the arbiter, when given, shall be tastes final and conclusive; and it shall be curiek, withbat reserve, into immediate effect, by Com missioners airpointed for that purpose by the contract ing patties. ART. VIM The Convention shall be ratified and the crease. The working chines e would not then go more to publk•houses than they did at present. They were driven to the use of spirits because they could not pro cure good beer at a fair price. This would not be the case if a monopoly was not sanctioned by the present system of law. This limitation of the ttade prevented the manufacture of malt from being er ended. Not withstanding the great increase of population, the malt trade was not greater now than it was many years back. Mr. BANKES said, there was one clause affecting corporate rights, to which he must object. He had strong representations on the subject from Weymouth. He should not be disposed to countenance any plan by which the respectability and autibority of Corporate Magistrates should be diminished. Lord SANDON opposed the clau se, granting a con s current jurisdiction to County Magistrates. He thought it unnecessary and unjust. Mr. H UME said, the clause objected to by the Noble Lord appeared to him the best in the Bill. He objecied, WILLITLIT 11. THE DUNI OT areurrner. however, to the measure altogether. The trade in leer should be as free as any other . It was not ri g h t that ' resumed his argument in favou r of t he A pp ellant , 31 1% r i . r. Nt B ' erle u s G le sl yrl MMUS Ill Oat THE COMM be IS. an artificial value s h ou ld given to property bt local brought erugwhtue ieptteeraSitiayinrensdßarifidrgset licensing system. Magistrates or any others. This was done by the present 13111, andtile. Bc Y t m wo ' and tith ot erP he ri r vat iem eßi b ll e s r , s w , ic time. Mr. PAYNE presented an account from the Margate Pier and Mr. WOOD supported the Bith l. Th trade i t State o beer f thiwanes Harbour Company. in Ireland and Scotland. where e n . The Earl of MA Llil ESBURY presented a Petition from a nu and respectable body of the Owners and Occupiers of Land free, proved that some restriction wa s desirab le in rantin licenses. The Clauses did not appear to him and Growers of Wool in the county of Hams, complaining of the g g The Petition was, on the motion of t h e Noble Earl, ordered to be Mr, low price of that article, in consequence of excessive importation. liable to the objections m a d e to them. referred to the Committee above stairs. ' CALCRAFT objected to the clauses giving concurrent a jutisdiction to County Magistrates. Take The Private Bills before the House. on -the motion of the Earl ' away the local jurisdictions if they were objectionable, of SHATTISBUIT, were forwarded in their respective stages. but de not degrade them. Were charters nothing j Lord KING held in his band a Petiti on from William Cobbett,l of Kensington, Gentleman, against the Surrey and Sussex Turn- He was surprised the Member for the University of pike Bill. The Noble Lord having been inform ed that the Bill Oxford s hould treat charters so li g htly. If the dame was not before the House, withdrew the Petition for the present. was not withdrawn, he should oppose the Bill alto_ The Night Poaching Bill, on the motion of Lord Weeseciares, was reties third time and posed.—Adjourned. Sir Sir J. SEBRIGHT thought this clause was the very HOUSE OF COMMONS. best in the whole Bill, and would give more satisfaction On the motion of Mr. Vim', a Return was ordered of all Ma to ~t h. e p ublic at large than any other part of it. PEEL said, he considered the House nufactured Silk Goods imported, from the sth of January, 1323, to the .sth of the present month, for home consumption. Mr. Secretary Mr. CURTEIS presented a Petition from certain Growers of and the country indebted to his Hon. Friend (Mr. Est- Wool in the County of Sussex , praying,for a duty on foreign Wool. court), who took so much trouble with a measure of this On the motion of the same lion. Gentleman, a Return was or kind, which, from its nature, could not have any great 'dared of all Live Sheep exported from England to the Continent , attractions for such a person as his Hon. Friend , whose of Europe during the three last years. Mr. T. WOOD presented a Petition from Rotheram against Pursuits in life might seem inconsistent with details of the late Malt Duty.—Ordered to lie on the table. this kind. The only object his Honourable Friend could Mr. BASTO presented a Petition from Elise Bridge on the have had in view was to promote the public g00d..... subject of One Pound Nutes,*. (Hear). Knowing the pains taken by his Hon. Friend sir. H EA THCOTE presented Petitions from the Wool growers of the county of Carnarvon, and of a certain township in the same in a case where success could not be expect:: i to minter County, praying for a Tax on Foreign Wool.—Ordered to lie on a very brilliant name, he thought him entitled to public the table. thanks; It had been asked, why not pot beer on the Mr. SYKES presented a Petition from the Surgeons of Hull, same footing W ithout ledge•—lteterred to the Committee. nto general pr i ncip l es on the subject of trade, the reason Mr. SPRING RICE rose to move for leave to bring in a Bill * here was obvious enough s—the consumption of beer to amend the law relating to the system of Banking in Ireland.— produced vary different effects to the consumption of The House was aware that, in England, the Branches of the Bank bread and cheese ; it produced intoxication, which nate of England, established in different parts of the country, were by law obliged to pay their notes in specie, at the place of issue. This, rally led to other results, affecting not only di: indivi it was clear, must operate as a salutary check against an over issue. dual but society at large. If they were to throw open Now there was no such restriction in Ireland; and the object of the trade, they would, he had no doubt, very soon find his Bill was to provide, that the Branches of the Bank of Ireland, it necessary to retrace their steps. In the cider counties and other Banks, should be obliged to pay their notes in specie, at the place of issue. A more immediate and beneficial check would great evil was found to arise from withdraning the due be established, and he trusted the motion would not be op- restrictions on the sale of cider, and the complaints were posed. It involved none of those principles of banking upon which so numerous that it might become necessary to institute differences of opinion exiated.—Leavewas given tobring in the Bill. a c t inquiry gutty with a view to some remedy. In theie The Pensions Act Amendment Bill went through a Committee. " The Report was ordered to be received to-morrow. counties instances occurred of children getting intoxi- ALE HOUSES. cated in consequence of the facility and cheapness with Mr. ESTCODRT moved the Order of the Day for the second which cider might be had. While he admitted the reading of the Ale House Licensing Bill. general principle that it was desirable every branch of Mr. HEATHCOTE said, he regretted much . that trade should be equally free, still as the trade in this such a rage for legislation prevailed. If it went much artiste had some connection with the Police of the further they would not, in a short period of time, know country; it was thought expedient to ccnfide to Ma the country. it would be so much altered.—(A laugh). crates the power of licensing. At the same time no This subject seemed rather a strange one to be taken person would say that this power should be enjoyed or up by the Member for the University of Oxford. The exercised as a beneficial privilege—(Hear). Honourable clause to which he objec•ed was, that which gave a con- . Gentlemen talked of charters, and the - Member for current jurisdiction to County Magistrates in cities, Wareham asked, whether charters were nothing. Im towns, and boroughs, where there were not six Magis- portant rights were no doubt secured by these enact's, crates to form a Bench. He trusted the Honourable which established local jurisdictions, but then they did Member would feel disposed to modify the Bill in this not confer the privilege of licensing. That was derived respect. There was another clause which he thought from Act of Parliament, and the Legislature might objectionable, as it appeared to him that it went to ex regulate it as they thought expedient. It appeared to elude every Gentleman who might be the owner of a him that if the power of licensing was to be exercised public house from sitting as a Magistrate. This he by two local Magistrates, they did not take sufficient feared would have the effect of removing from the Co- security against abuse. mission of the Peace the great majority of the Landed Sir J. GRAHAM supported the Bill. He should be Gentlemen of the country. The clause to which he able to show, in the Committee, that the clause giving alluded was that which went to preclude a Magistrate a concurrent jurisdiction to County Magistrates was att• from voting relative to a public house being his own solutely necessary to prevent abuse. The power net. roperty cised by local jurisdictions was, as he could prove in Mr. BERNAL objected to the clause giving a con- m an y . instances, greatly abused. current jurisdiction to County Magistrates. Why require Mr. CURTEIS thought it would be desirable to in that there should be six Magistrates present for granting sett a clause in the Bill which would give the authority licenses, when two were hitherto sufficient? The Bill to Magistrates of convicting upon the information of required that when there were not in a city, town, or persons not connected with the Excise. borough, so many as six Magistrates, those of the Mr.ESTCOURT said that Magistrates already pos county should have a concurrent jurisdiction. If his sassed that power. With respect to this Bill, it wasnow Hon. Friend (Mr. Estcourt) consented to modify this in the same state in which it came from the Committee. and the other clause alluded to by the Hon. Gentleman near him (Mr. Ileathcote), he shoolir be disposed to He should not at present discuss the clause which ga ve a concurrent jurisdiction, but would be prepared to de• give the Bill a favourable censideraiion. It would be fend it in the Committee. He contended, from the very hard if places which ertpsyed by charter a local example of Scotland and Ireland, that a• free trade in jurisdiction should be thus deptived of their lights.— beer would he injurious. There was no reason why a stigila of this kind should be thrown on Magistrates who were known to discharge Mr. DUNDA 8 expressed himself hostile to the clause for giving a concurrent jurisdiction to County Ma their duties as well and as impartially as any others in gistrates. the country. Lord BELGRAVE said he should Op7ose the till Sir R. HERON hoped the Honourable Gentleman if the ed. clause sine would granting a concurrent jurisdiction would not consent to any alteration of the Bill. Pub - retain lic•houses were a great source of evil to the working Mr. Sergeant ONSLOW thought the clause giving classes. The greatest abuses in the present system arose from local jurisdictions, and therefore he approved of the clause giving a concurrent jurisdiction to County m i n d s Magistrates. It would operate as a check, and tend reatly to remove the present abuses. • Mr. JONES objected to the clause giving a concur rent jurisdistion to County Magistrates. Many places would thus be deprived of privileges which they long g ° a concurrent jurisdiction to County Magistrates was unteecessary. and must operate as an insult upon the of many highly respectable and honourabie men S\ ho discharged the duties of local Magistrates. Thei were mote interested than any others could be in Pre' serving good order within their jurisdiction, and e was not therefcee likely that they teeiuld grant liven es io persons unworthy of them. He might instance in proof enjoyed. It would be unfair to take 'from them by a o f th is side wind lights which they exercised by charter. It Mr. SUGDEN opposed the Bill. these jurisdictions were objectionable, let some measure be proposed either to improve or do them away al- Mr. BARING said, that when the particuhor clauses came to be further considered, he would enter more ,together. Mr. SLANEY thought the trade in beer, the second fully upon the subject. At present he thought . its ten" Mr. of life, might to be more free. He did not 'Rion of Corporate Magistrate'. dency would be of an injurious nature to tee Jerielic mean to deny that Magistrates ought to have jurisdic- . lion in granting licenses; but then the facility ot obtain- e ing the should be much greater. There were 49,500 Mr. SYKES expressed a hope that, at a futur e sta g e twr f aa t ts t e . a e s s of Bill au , cch t o hue coun t y clause tsy a y in n would gthat th be withdrawn—bec a use e decision Ot two Mag i '' is. i t m publicans in England and Wales; of these, 23,000 drew their own beer—the rest dealt with brewers. In a borough. was then w London there were 4,530 publicans, of whom only 39 T he Bi ll read a second time, and ordered to be coat sold their own beer. With rtietion to the trade in this ould be equal to six Magist rates of mined on Friday, the tah June next. article, the country might be divided into six districts. The first three contained a population of 5,000,000, the A Message from the Lords aim:timed their Lonlships !ere!: whole of which was supplied by 920 brewers. In the ment to the Birmingham Improvement, Surrey Coal Aleuts ' BIN and other Private Bills, without any amendment. other three districts six out of every seven publicans Mr. SPRING RICE moved the Order .4 the Day for the brewed at home, and supplied their customers with athrou gh a o.romittee. The House going i nto a Committee of the whole Home on the Ifigues of Executors Bill. The lull went cheaper and a better article. All he desired was, that .6 ioltitproarttwn on theasero 6th jn brought up,uae next. ao x itred to be taken into furth er c an opportunity should be given for fair competition. id beer, and hop duties, together with those paid by The revenue arising from tbis trade, including malt, b CURTEISo ul J, f fo r ai l M On .;%nir: the motion that the Coro Importation Bill be committed, taken to be a part o n f pl:: th :p i t s cd' of 7,500,0001. The ttade should be rendered more free brewers, maltsters, and publicans, amounted to the turn was, that public houses :err?c.a.suciioiatfuryset.hetolcieothrinentierdaeude:te:debe:bcd:st,,h.releiliaut,sele::oll4:l than at present. The objection order to prevent those shameful frauds which it was ot upon R A this NtK L s u i b k j s e c l t i L KVITI S contended, that this Bawl:103 would be increated. He could ace no evil iu this in-. some( all that was really men fur by the lion. MMUS'. A 1 ratifications shall be exchanged in nine months from the date berenf, or ,noner, ii possible. In witness whereof, we, the respective Plenipotentiaries, have signed the same, and have of thereto the seals of our arms. Dune at Loudon, the '_9th day of Si' ytember, in the year of Our LOKI) 1827. (LS.) MA. GRANT. (L.S.) iiK.NRY UNWIN ADDINGTON. (L. S.) A ',BEAT GALLATIN. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT• HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 21. ROSCOMMON ranamts. The Petition of Thomas Wentworth Ddion's counter claim in this Peerage cause was to be considered ; but no person appearing for the Petitioner, the Chairman reported progress. taunt TURAGI. Four witnesses in this cause were examined respecting a monu ment of the Leigh family. said to lave existed in Stoneleigh Church. At a quarter to one o'clock the further proceeding was adjourned. I e .e 1 is e e )- c- !e it of e he he 4: 4 )0- of 11.1 in iad ,Id 04 . • No IT Ta 91