Star. — London, England, 1805-06-07 00:00:00

PARI.I.I dENTAR r PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, THURSDAY, Jule 6. Their Lordihips trot at an early hour, and pu►furnt to the Spe cial Order of yellerday, Connfcl and evidence were called in re fpeding Lingttam's Divorce Bill. The circunntancet of this cafe arc already fully before our rea ders. The confider - anion of the cafe was refueled, and evidence further cuntin:d, and Counfcl heard. After come difeutbon of the 'aeries of the cafe, the queflion for the fecond reading of the Bill was, on the fuggeltion of the Lord Chancellor, poltponed till to-morroW. The funher eonfideration of Moores Divorce Bill was then m illiard. Of the circurottances of this cafe, we have alto given a detailed Report. Some farther inveftigadon took place; after which the queftion of the fecund reading of the Bill was poftponed till next week. WISTON't DIVOtCI BILL. On the original contideration of the queftion for the fecond reading of a Bill to diffolve the marriage of Thomas Welton, Efq. with Frances Mary, hi- now %;;'e, Counfel and evidence in fupport of the Bill were called in. From the statements and depositions of thefe, it appeared, that the Petitioner, Thomas Welton, Efq. now a Major in the 96th Regiment of Foot. was, in the month of December 1787, mar ried to Frances Mary, the daughter of Francis Lenn, Efq. one of the Captains of the Royal Hofpital at Greenwich, and that they lived and cohabited together as man and wife from that time, until the month of April 1794. It appeared that the Petitioner, at the time of his marriage, was a Lieutenant in the 77th Regiment of Foot—in the following year, viz. 1788, lie was ordered with his Regiment to India, whither his wife accompanied him : but in April 1794, the was obliged, on account of ill-health, to return to England, where (he arrived in September 1794. The Petnirmer remained in India. The iffue of this mar riage was three children, one of whom is now a fon of fourteen years of age. That in the mote of the year 1796, Mrs. Weilon eriered into an unlaw ful and adulterous intercourfe with Heeor John Weir, Efq. an officer in the South Devon Militia, by whom the bas had feveral children, all of whom were bora previous to the Petitioner's return from India, which was not until April 1802. • In confequence of thefe proceedings, Major Welton brought his aeinn in ' lacy Vacation in 1803. in the Court of King's Bench, againft Heaor John Weir, act, in which the Defen dant fuffered damages to go by default—and by a Writ of Enquiry before the Sheriffs in the following June, he obtained a verdia for five thoufand pounds damages. In the following year the Petitioner WU tuted the ufual proceedings in the Confitlory Court of Rochefter againft Mrs. Welton, and obtaine r therein a definitive fentence of divorce from bed and board. This was the general fubilance of the cafe. It was elfo Rated, that the Lady had been delivered of four children, daring the interval of her living with the Defendant, two of whom are now living. The Counfel Rated, he could further fubftantiate the charge of the adultery, did their Lordthips not think the flatement conclusive on that head. The LORD CHANCELLOR obferved, that if they could prove that the Petitioner refided out of England from a given time before the birth of the firft child until after the delivery of the laft, the circum fiance of the Lady having had four children in the interval was pretty firong evidence of her adukery. Accordingly an elderly officer, who had been in the fame regiment with Major Welton, and had re tided in India from 1794 to *BO4, Rated, that he bad no doubt of the Petitioner's re(iding in India from the year 1795 till 38os ; an interval later than the birth of the youngeft child above alluded tn. After a very Ihort farther difcuffi )n, the Bill was forthwith lead a fecond time, and ordered to be com mitted. The CM s of the Crown for the County of I aneaßer prefented Accounts of the Number of Prifoners confined in, and thc State of certain Gaols in that County—which were ordered to lie on the Table. On the mntion of Lord HAWKESBURY, the order for the exclnlion of [bangers was enforced— and the doors w;re kept (hut for more than half an hour. MR. JUSTICR TOT. Upon the Order of the Day being moved for their Lordfhips to refume the examination of witneffcs re lative to the charge preferred againft the Honour able Mr. Jullice Fox, Connie! and strangers were or dered to withdraw. Their Lordfhips remained deliberating near an hour ; Mr. Juftice Fox was then called in, and Mr. Romilly tecommended the examination of Mr. Armarong, the Foreman of the Jury, upon whofe petition and complaint the prefent enquiry was initituted. The wit nets was arft talked, whether, after he had heard the evidence upon the indiament which had given life to the condo& of the learned Judge, he could con fcientioully have found any of the prifoners guilty ? Mr. Adam objeaed to this queftion as too general, and it was waived. The witnefs, on being crofs ex amined by Mr. Adam, Rated, that the trial in quer- Sinn took place on the loth of Auguft 1803 ; that additional evidence was gone into alter the Jury had retired ; that the witnefs, as the foreman, delivered aboutthe verdia of acquittal, having been out half an hour. On the aoth of Auguft, the day after the trial, Mr. Daley Fox defired the Clerk of the Cro.. n to deliver to him alift or the Petit jurors. When he id received the lift, he defied the Grand Jury to called, and-he ftigmatifed the Petit Jury as un worthy of being believed on oath, and unfit to aft in lie capacity of Jurors. He alfo ordered the Clerk the Crown to deliver the lift to every fucceeding idge, as confifting of men unfit to as as jurors; sin that the. High and Under Sheriff (boold have is delivered to them, in order that it. might be ,mown the prors were branded with infamy by the verdiet they had given, and further, that their names lsould be polled up in the Grand Jury Room. The quads (hated that be had been ermined on this ibjea before a Covunittee of the Houfe of Lords. le added, that fhortly after the cirenmftance to ;hich he was &poring, he and his brother jurymen ipplied to Coupfel fur. advice. Upon being afked vhen he firft faw the prefent _petition, he Paid it was ldng after the trial at the (amour of 'B4 ; one the Jury brought it-to him for his fignatuse. He rlieved the name of this Juror was Fawcett. He lmitted that in the part of Ireland in which he and se reft of the jury tefided, though they did not re- Ire the newfpapers, they had means of knowing tat paired in Parliament. lie knew before he fign. the petition that a complaint had been made in the Houfe spina Mr. Juftice For. He Paid Fawcett Ncl Weir brought the petition to him ; motes of the , 1 • LJJ Lord a la b t l i e vt dered delib; .• then the e I of th the nets I evide to tit! mu A t and L amino tinn t additi ' f t retire the vo hour. Mr. j delive had r be cal worth the ca of tho 1 Judge alfn t o lilts c • o know verdi! i 'lnuit witne: fobjee 4 - 1 iff e 2 which appli< when ai Ick I 1 of the believ admit the re seine what ed the 1 the 1-1 • • mid V i .• Jury Were prefent at the time. It was at the houfe of Mr. Reid, an innkeeper. They met in a parlour of the inn. He did not know who drew up the petition. Mt. ROMILLY fubmitted that the Connie) for the Learned Judge had no right to prefs this courfe of enquiry. Mr. ADAM contended, that as the Jury, by pre• ferring a joint complaint again(' the learned Judge, were united as plaintiffs in the fame cattle, whatever any of them had done or laid, was capable of being proved, and was equally applicable to all. Lord ELLENBOROUGH laid, there could be no quedion with regard to the competency of the evidence. In all profecutions carried un in criminal courts, it was the ordinary and costa:int courfe to et amine into the motives by wl.ich the profecotots were a6tuated. If it appeared that they held plicate affemblies, and confulted fecretly together, it was a molt pregnant and important fad in the c"nliderot ion of the charge : it indicated the motives the profecn• tors had in view.; it (hewed that the profecution, in ftead of being founded in a funk . of private injury and a regard to public krilice, proceded from ma lice, ill will, or time other impure motive. Not only the affert.bly or tuee•Lig of the profecutors was an aft material to proved, but the declarations of any of them accompanytrg fuch at were important. The objedion to the evidence, thetefore, would not bear an argument. The v:itnefs proceeded to date, that he did not know who drew up the petition, or who gave inftruZlions for it. They employed an at torney, who fumetimes lived in Dublin, and tome times in Fermanagh. This attorney was the father of one of the Jurors. The witnefs was afked whether he had given the fame kind of evidence before the Committee of the Houfe of Lords ? Lord HAWKESMURY thought it irregular to refer to the evidence given beforc the Committee. The Duke of CLA:%.ENCE intimated, that as the quellion had been objeliekt to by a Noble Lord, it would be proper for the Learned Counfel to with draw it. Mr. ADAM contended, th tt he had a right to afk the queftion, in order to compare the evidence given by the witnefs now, with that which had been given before. It was a courfe of examination which went to the credit of the witnefs's teftimony. He there• fore thought, with fubmillion, that their Lorcithips would allow him to. proceed. Mr. Not-AN fupported his arguments. Mr. Rom ILL? was heard on the other fide. The LORD CHANCELLOR laid, their Lord. (hips were called upon by the Counfel for the Learn ed Judge to direa that to be done, which they had laid (Mould not be done. Their Lordlhips had re filled to communicate the evidence taken before the Committee, and yet they were defired to Puffer the Counfel to afk quellions which would oblige the wit nefs to repeat his evidence over a„oain, Lord MINTO oblerved, that he was not aware their LordOrips had ever come to any loch decition He did not know they had ever palled any vote upon the fubjea. He certainly recolleaed a hoble Lord's moving a queftion of the kind, but their Lordfhips adjourned without agreeing to it. It was brought on again, but no refolution was adopted. He was of opinion that it was a queftion which required further deliberation—it was important to fubitantial that it fhould be reconfidered—not to do fo he conceived, be a fact ifice of jullice to forms. The only ground of argument dated for refuting to publith the evidence before the Committee was, that it was a Secret Committee. Why was it called a Secret Committee ? Sure he was, it did not bear that clia raaer—nor was there; in its proceedings, any cit cumftance from which ; could, with propriety, have been fo denominated. It was fo far fecret, that out of regard to the learned Judge, it was deemed pro. per not to publith the evidence before their Lordibips had determined upon the enquiry at their bar—but the motive for fecrecy ceafed, the moment their Lord lhips were of opinion there ought to be a public in• veltigation. As it was a proceeding conneaed with the adminiftration of public jullice, the charaaer of publicity naturally attached to it. He hoped, there. fore, that Houfe would deliberate on the propriety cf publithing the proceedings of the Committee. It was obvious that if it was not publifbed, the Learned Judge would have to defend himfelf at a very great difadvantage ; while, on the other hand, every ad vantage would be afforded to the Petitioners—while the evidence was kept fccret, it was difficult even to know who the Petitioners were, or whether it was the caufe of the Petitioners theinfelves or of other parties. He alluded particularly to a Noble Marquis who was an accufer upon this r ccation. Their Lord lhips could not but be fentible that the accufers and the accufed did not nand on equal grounds, bccaufe the former Were acquainted wilh the whole of the evi dence given before the Committee, while the latter was entirely ignorant of it. Their Lerdlhips too were placed in an embarrafling and delicate filtration, from which nothiiig but the publication of the evi dence could relieve them ; they had the evidence, but it &mild be recolleaed that it was given ex pane; it was the evidence of the accufers, who confequent ly had never been crols-exathined. Their Lordthips came to the inveftigation with that impreftion which three weeks evidence, not crofs-examined, was calcu lated to produce. The ohjeaion in this cafe was not of the fame force as in ordinary cafes, for though the evidence given before a Gland Jury was ex parie, they did not communicate it to the Petit Jury who tried: their Lordthips, as Grand Jury, firlt heard the ex parte evidence, and then, with that previous ' impreffion, proededed to try the accufed. This, he conceived wrong, and therefore he hoped their Lord (hips would take the inkjet into their ferious . con fideration. Lord SIDMOUTH Paid, the Houfe was at liberty to deliberate again on the fubjea of the Noble Lord's fpeech, as no formal decifion had taken place. He had underflood that a general admiffion had been made, as to the difficulty of publithing the evidence, not arifing merely on the point of form, but other °Mules which Hood in the way. He was however of opinion, that an adherence to formi would ulti mately be attended with the mail fubl}antial jullice. The evidence before the Committee had been taken, in order to enable their Lordihips to judge of the propriety of purfuing the enquiry. It was now pro. poled to ufe that evidence for a different purpore. As to the ciretunfiance.of the Learned Judge being ignorant•of falls known to the Petiticiners, it was an inconvenience to which every perfon ;,,:culed was cubjeft- 'He was of opinion that there Ira* no: fuifi cient pc:m:3 tc, indace :lei: JiLips to puWilL the evidence. Lord CAR LISLE are Eyee, that the evidence on the enquiry btforc the Committee ought to be as public as the Sua at noon day. Why were Ilion hand writers employed to take down the evidence, if it was af.erwards to be kept a profound fecret. He se a , o f Apiniuri that their Lordfhips, ih, juftice to the Learned and refpedabie Magiflrate at the bar, ought to allow him the benefit of his Counfel having the whole of the evidence before them. The Earl of BUCKING fIA NI.S II I RE confidered the publication of evidence, fo entirely rxpaia as that taken before the Committee, to be extremely im proper Earl SPENCER urged the meafure of furnifhing the Learned Judge at the Bar with a Copy of the Eridence taken before the former Committee. He aliO thought, that the prefent evidence fhuuld be printed for the ufe of the Houle. Lord HAWKESBURY had no objection to the evidence now going on being made public. It was not like that before the former Committee, merely an examination in chief. The witneffes at the Bar were fubjea to a crufv-examination, and therefore their evidence wnuld go to the world with all the co louring the parties on either tide could give to it. The LORD CHANCELLOR (fated that it was abfolutely necefrary their Lordfhips thould come to fome decifion on the fubje& under confederations but it was his opinion, that in the mean time the queßion' propofed by the Conniel lbould not be put. If the Learned Counfel were permitted to put fuch queßions it was evident that, with his saftive mind, he would eafily draw from the witnefles every thing they had Rated in the former Committee. In order to ena. ble their Lordfhips to come to a decifion on the main queßion, it was neceffary that fome Noble Lord should make a motion on the fubjeet, and he felt it very dif ficult to form an opinion as to what the purport of th a t motion fhould be. It had been propofed on a former occalion to revive the Committee, and whe ther that was the mode which ought now to be taken, he did not pretend to decide. He reminded their Lordfhips, however, that in coming to a decifion on this cafe, they wr.uld eftabliflt a precedent which would apply to all cafes generally. Every word of t!:e evidence taken before the Committee might have redounded to titc honour and credit of Mr. Plaice Fix ; b :t in making this fuppofition, their Lordfhips wrt e aware that the rule of furnifhing evidence might be applied to cafes of a very different nature. Lord ELLENBOROUGH agreed with the No ble and Leal ned Lord, that the queßion thould not now be put ; hut he was of opinion, that, unlefs the terms of the Houle precluded fuch quellions the ge neral law of evidence arithorifed the Counfel to put them. He thought that the Committee had already come to a decifion on the queftion of furnifhing a copy of the evidence ; bur, as that was nee the cafe, he hoped they v?c,uld determine it without further dtlay. Lord MINTO obferved, that the propriety of fur nilhing a copy of the evidence before the former Com mittee, and the right of the Conrail to put fuch quef lions as that now under confidetation, formed, in his opinion, two leparate points of dirculEon. The Duke of CLARENCE moved, that the Chairman do leave the Chair ; this, after foine fur ther converfation between Tome of the above men tioned Peers, was ordered; and, after the Houle was refunied, the converfation oq ;.he fame fubjea, but rather in an irregular way, was continued, and prin cipally turned upon the form in which the intended motion ihnitld be couched. The effett of the motion, as originally propofe4 on a former evening, was, that the out-doors Com mitt.-e be tevived, for the purpofe of reporting to' the Houle the evidence which had been given before the laid Committee, in order that the fame may be , communicated to Mr. Janice Fox, &c. Load A UCKLAND. and other Peers, fuggefled the propjet) , of dividing this Motion; fo as that, when the proceedings required should be laid upon the table, the quettion of the communication would remain to he conlidered by the Houfe ; this, they conceived, would obviate the difficulty in point of fot m. The LORD CHANCELLOR feemed Rill to re tain hi, objeflions on the fcore of form, principally with relped to the mode of communication ; he alto had his doubts as to the joltice of the proceedings. L , rd HAWKESBURY, in the courfe of his ob it' vations on the fubjeet, deprecated every thing that tended to delay : the two queßions tbould therefore be decided, the one thortly after the other, though un avnicl..ble difficulties mull arife in the cafe, as the knowledge ofiss hat might be the intention of theHoufe as to the fecond quellion, that of communicating the evidence, would certainly influence his determination as to the fit The Marquis of A BERCORN approved of part of what fell from his Noble Friend, the Secretary of State ; though he declined giving a pofitive opi nicn upon the fubjed, farther than that if the pro-1 ceiciii,i),s were" laid ou the table, they ought to be printed. Lord EI.LENBOROUGH was of opinion, that' by the adoption of a middle courfe, the differences which teemed to prevail among their Lorclihips may be reconciled. Suppofe a copy of the proceedings were laid upon the table ' flaring it to be for the ufe of the Houle, and whi c h might be referred to as oc cation may require. The Duke of CLARENCE expreffed his approba tion of the idea of the Noble and Learned Lord. After fome farther difctiffion as to the mode of proceeding, Lord MINTO renewed his notice of his intention zo bring the fubjed regularly before the Houfe to morrow, and moved, that the Lords be fummoned on the occafion.—Ordered. Lord WALSINGHAN moved, that the Commit tee on the cafe of Mr. Juflice Fos do fit again to morrow, which being oritertd accordingly, the Houfe at hall pall eight o'clock adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Sir L. Pi ito:vs tot& the oaths tqa hie feat as Repreelltatille of the Kirnet County in Ireland. Sir J. ANDEItsON prefented a Petition from the Directors of the V&A Iri.r.a Docks, w Mai was alfo ordercd to be ISid on the tatle. The Poor Lid was recomnsitted, sod ordered to be reported to nsa7rutv. _ _ The Repert of the Expiring haws Committee was brought up. The Refonetons were agreed to,,aut Bills ataiefeti eXtuformaLlY to toe fpirit a the On the motion of Mr. CREEVEY, the order for taking aro confider:6on the Petition complaitiMg of an naive Ekett •n fa the County of Middlcfct, was dd.harged, and a cew order us. made for to-morrow fe'or'g•tt. The Report of the C,munittec of the Dllce of Athors petition w 2: ordered to be uken ;ow cunfi•lcruiou to-morrow. Mr. WHITBREAD move.!, that there be laid h.-fore the iluok an Account of the remaining in the hands of the Rcecissr General of the Cultoms at the dole of each Turd. accoant,fassa the year 1793 to the sth of April laft.—Ordered. The Honourable Member then moved, that a lilt of tbeßanws of fuels perform as had puffeffion of Navy, Vidualliug and Thal port Office Bills in the years t7sts. S, and 6, and by wham they were given up to the Bank of Bogland, be laid before the Hoak. But, on the luggeßicsa of Mr. Loug, the modal was find for to morrow. The Report on the Fifh Bounty Bill urn ordered to be take into confideration on Monday next. The Committee nn the Dublin Police Bill was ordered to be take:, incu cobfileratiuu to-morrow. The Loyalty Loan Ae/ Amendment Bill, the Claim Canal Bill, the kith and the Br itifh Militia Clothing the Subalterns Mi litia Officers' Allowance Bill. the Adjutant And Serjeant Major's Allowance Bill, and the kith Paper Duty Collodion liill were fey •orally read a firft time, and Dip fccoud reading ordered for te• culrrow. The Hoare went into a Committee on the Hill of litrwth Hu. boor Bill, in which It was refaced that it was expedient that a form not exceeding la be appliul to the conftr u di o n o f a her. hour for the accomm odation of his MJjelly's Packets at that part of the Coed of Ireland. The trial Horfe and Dog Duty Bill wasyeported, and ordered to be read a third time on Monday. The Houle having refolved itfeif into a Committee on the Spa jai& Red Wine Bill, Mr. Hu&iron moved that rho blank for the ligation of the Pro Pored duty be Oiled up with the words per ton additional" 'Mr. BROOKE moved thatten be totaled initead of the wail '' twelve." But the original motion was carried without a diviiion. The Houk then rdumod, and the Report was ordered to be re., mired to-morrow. In a Committee of tile whole Hoare on the Aet of the 35 ft of the King, fir the better Regulating the Government of Seamen in the Coafting Trade, it was refolved that it was expedient that the fail A 3 be amended. _- --- The Houle refunied, the Report was then brought up and agreed to, and a Bill ordered accordingly. Thl Public Offenders Elcape Bib yeas committed, and ordered to be reported to-morrow. Colonel CRAUFtIitO gave notice, that tomorrow he would more for fame Additional Papers relative to the Smte of the Army. A Meffage was delivered from the Lords, rtqueitiog that Sit James Stewart, Bart. and the Right Hon. Sir John Stewart, But. be permitted to attend and give evidence before the Committee of the Lords on the cafe of Judge Fos. The Meffengers were acquainted that this Node would fend ask anfwer by Meffengcrs of their own. The Affelkd Tax Colledors bill was read a fecond time, and ordered to be referral to a Committee of the whcde Houk to. morrow. 'COLLIN 111NUFACTUIIRS. Mr. BROOKE prefented a Petition, figned by 30,000 Woollen-manufadurers of the county of York, in favour of the Bill now pending. The Honoura. ble Member preented fimilar petitions from the coun , ties of Snmerfet, Wilts, and Glouceller—ln bringing up thee lalt petitions, Mr. Brook Rated, that as fe rictus difputes crated between the labourers and the manufaeturers, it was much to be withed that all the Jaws relating to this fubjeet thould be reviled ; that fuch laws as were found to be unnecelTary thould be re pealed, and that fuch as were found to be fitting and adapted to the matter in queltion Ihould be confirmed in oae fimple general code, fo that both parties might in future know what they were about. On the fecond reading of the Woollen manufaeur ere-Bill being moved, Mr. Brooke withed the fecond reading to be deferred till bfraday next. Sir R. BUXTON followed, and moved an amend• assent, In place of " now," that " the Bill be read s; fecond time this day three months." After a few words from Mr. H. Lafcelles this amendment was withdrawn, and the Bill was ordered to be read a feCond time on Monday. GRAND JUNCTION AND PADDINGT°N CANALS. Mr. HUKISSON moved the Order of the Day, for the Honfe in a Committee, taking into confedera tion the Report 'of the ComMittee on the expediency of allowing Coils to be brought to London by the Grand jundion and ['Addington Canals. Sir R. MILBANISE dated, that he felt very great apprehenfions at the introduction of coals to the me ropolis by thefe canals, becaufe fuch a meafure, elpe dally (hould it be fandioned by Parliament, would tend molt materially to defiroy the coal trade of the North, and would alto prove highly injurious to the intereß of the 'hipping from that quarter. He had bean told by naval men, that in navigating the coat, from Newcaale to London, thilailors became hardy and expert feamen, by their fervice on board the col liers; that when they entered into the navy, they were always called on for exertion when a Ihip of war was in any extremity, or going through any dif ficult or dangerous navigation. He mentioned this lid with no other view that merely to thew, that notwithftanding a triling benefit might be conferred on the metropolis, Rill a great detriment'and inpry would eventually accrue to the North country coal trade, the great nurfery of Britilh feamen. Mr. HUSKISSON dated, thAt the Committee had been folly aware of the objedions urged by the Hon. Baro'net, and bad not made, from various mules which they had fpecified, a full report upon the Cub jed ; they had however fufficient information before theta, to authorife them in their opinion, that 50,000 tons of coals might he brought to London by the Grand Junction and Paddington Canals; from the prefent time to the rlt of June, r 1306. Experience would however [hew whether or not ais meafure would have the efed cf preventing a rife in the price of coals, and thole &Jaunting and alarming encreafes in the value of fuel, which had fo i.ften (Kcal-red. Sir RALPH MILBANK faid, he tvA of opinion that the Inland Carriage of Coals would have x ten dency to decreafe the number of mott excellent fea men that are Annually railed by the conveyance of that article coaftwife. Mr. HUSKISSON obferved, that the Committee to which the petition on the fubjea before the Houfe was reterred,.had not had time to invetligate the bu fines completely, but that they were of opinion that the prefent meafure ought to be adopted AS a tempo. racy expedient, and that next Sellion the fubjea fhould be more minutely inquired into. Sir M. W. RIDLEY declaied, that the Committee was driven to the adoption of fuch a Ref°hition, tram a confideration of the quarter from which the props. fition came. ?hey had only acceded tis what they had not the power to refill. Mr. BURDON had no doubt that, if time was given to exaznine into the matter, the inadequacy and inefficacy of the meafure would be completely expoled. Mr. SPENCER STANHOPE believed that, if Gentlemen tried tin experiment of paying ; os. or t pet in duty, they wu4hl not be very trucit difpofed v n i !hire t o h l el iei a n bYr sl:% i srui p ai rrita cciu.i c f r : rh n ue r a it c t .a ctih rm h , ; ir e ,iB e s e .u a e in t. , l . l—d i l wn: C2 m van dca to nuke t ot!vzrs we wntild cot c.-::oinon b t • filch a The a di viflon The li ed to be - The of die Houf *Ric* conrpts, Sidle+ per C. Re 3 per cent 4 PIN can 5 pet Cent S Per Cent L. Aso. tl The i attention day. taken Is from St bound f difpatell vernorit and mil The as was AEOLUS, CreW or difcorei great it proceed patches the zea The lON CH to the ' Martin On dm (poke Fahnoi It is the Sp: tray of the pu denim Lord 1 tome o fit ant Cen the AI teen 4 Ad (1211 lion I arrive Bay Di from the SpAn Di Lorc 38— TI JEST T 'nor Hate for Vol, it an lion burl Sstl that