Star. — London, England, 1815-11-09 00:00:00

J. NY lATELLICENCE. 0 . ii.,..„„ a rt to a Dome of the High Court of flamer', bearie: date • t:it:t day of June, 1814.m1.14 in a cense wLerein I)mturitY KING . WilklW, is plaintiff, ant'. rHOMAS From and others, are th-tendant, the creditors of BENJAMIN PIOES, late of the parish of Ramsey, iu the county of Southampton, yeoman, who flied in Ow month of June, 1800, are for, hviith to come in and rote their debts before 5A141.111 COMPTO% Cox, Esq. mie of tt e astei sof tile said Court, at hie Chambers, in Sotithamp ton.bui Wings, Chancery-lane, I.ondoii, or in default thereof, they will be excluded the benefit of the raid Deere% PREROGATIVE COURT. NOVEMBER S. TAPP v. SANDERS AND OTHERS. This was a cAttse respecting the.validity of the last will of It. Morgan, late of Camden-street, Islington, deceased. The deceased executed his will on the _ .4 October, 1805, by which he bequeathed to hi, tom cousins, or the survivor of them, £lOOO three per cent. Annuities, and legaci4 to his shopm.n and shop-woman, and several other persons, the residue to Mary Greenhough (his housekeeper) of EUint's ylace, Islington. In the year ISO 9, the deceased was attacked with a paralytic stroke, which entirely de prived him of the use of one side, and in Tune, Islo, in a fit of the same description, he tore his will into several pieces, but, on Mrs. Greenhougli coming into the room, she collected the pieces and put them to pether. This paper was.ptorunded by the Erect'. tors named therein, and opposed by :he next of kin. 'The Counsel on behalf of the next of kin adruittcel it vas impossible to impeach the evidence in support of the will. hut submitted that the expenses of the next of kin ought to be paid out of the effects of the de ceased. Sir J. Morrill, sad, there could he no question re specting the validity of the will, and pronounced for the same; but said, it was only under special circum stances that the Court directed the costs to be paid out of the effects, and he did not think that this case was one of that description, and therefore rejected the application. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WEDNE9D4 , NOV. s. CABROL 1). DE I'ASTF T. Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL rnoved for t new trial in this case. He statt:tl that it was a question of great importance to the commercial world, besides that many tl:ottiand pounds depended on the present cause. The cause was tiled a: the Sittings after last Term, at Guildhall. It W. 13 an action by the assignees of Messrs. Parry and Latlkim, brokers, to recover from tae defendant a quaitti:y of West India produce, which had been trausterred to Latham, as he contend ed, fraudulently, and by a voluntary preference, itl contemplation of bankruptcy. The facts were, that Mr. De Tartet employed Latham and Parry to buy Vest India produce for him, which they did, and as tarry told him, was in the si.lcks in his name. it ap peared that a Mr. Mardelt heard that De Tastet held his acceptance for several thousand pounds t knowing that his house had no such acceptance outstanding, he calls. on De 'Pasta and desired to see the bill. De Tastet declined :hewing k to him, and said it was the acceptance of another house; but this Mr. Mar dell insisted could not be the ease, as there was no house of the same Christian and surname. De Tastet then sent for Parry, and it turned nut that the accep. t ince was forged ; upon which De Tastet exclaimed IVlreie are my stv,ars, my rums, and my ca'ffee ?" —Party s iid On.) , were all sate in the docks. De Tastet immediately sent his broker, and made Pert y ti Ansley them all alto his name. Patty immediately aNsr..nded, and th , rehy committed an act of bank. virtu. The question was, whether the tranwer ob tained fr,,m Patty, N nth a halter about his neck, was not a conlyyundilig of felony, and was avatlable ia• s ' nst the cr..ditots of the estate of Latham and Parry ?. The Court said there was no evidence that Parry was ptomised an indemnity for keeping this transfer, :rid as die teanster was made before any act cf hank irni•tc,', Icy Latham and Parry, at the pressing instance of a creditor, it could not be considered as a fraudu lent and voluntary preterence.— Ride refused. LIAIttiATE.---TLIE KING v. THE PARIstl MI la. JOHN. Mi. GURNt.y moved for a errtio;arl, to retn ,, ve this matt, r into the Court of King's Ilene!), - horn the Do. ver It respected a r,,itd between the lown o 1 Margate and Acorn, which the prosecutor contend. .eat, had not been k. pt in a sufficient state of repair. in ordes to establish the contrary, the certificates of o Magistrates, residing in the indieted parish, had been produced at two separatesessions, when the ,Idct , was, that teo or three 'jays previous to the sessions, a few iv, ikmen had been employed to /at: the road in aviestion, by filling in the ruts, &c. in Grater to give a colour 4cr the certificates of the Magistrates. At the List liess;otis a Diaringat had been prayed for to coin. poi the pat ish of Juion to plead to the indictment, but it had been ref:lse& on the ground of the eertifi cite produced trom the Magistrates, who.could not be igni.rant of the real bad condition of the-road. Lord ELLesnott , .tott—lt -might have been well to lamina: the certifying Magistrates of the case decided upon .this suibject.• Mr. GettNe:i answered, that he had referred them to it at the zessions, and had offered .(the Magistratzs being upon die bench) that if they would swear to .:te truth 'of their certificates, be would drop the indict. intent against the parish, and would adopt another 'method of proceeding. He swished that the certificates should be removed into the Court of King's &nen. Lord ELLINBOROUGH --- It is competent .tor you to remove the.matter by certiorari, but I do not know what further purpose of justice will be answered by removing the certificates. Ths OA of the I.;ng v. Sir Joseph Maw bey and others. 6 !T. R. Cl 9, where it was held that a certificate by justices of the pt , sce, that a highway (Indictee) is in t epair i is a legal instrument r.Cltadmissiblel, ztd by the Courts of Law, and admissible In evidence .after convicttuti, when the Court are ai.iout to intrwe a fine. A 1.41 consequently it Is Illegal to conspire to pervert the course of justice by producing a false.catilitate in evidence to iollueuce the justice of the Court. COURT OT COMMON PLEAS, NOV-16 GAMING IN FRANCE. miouss V. SIR F. 11011/SHICAD, BART. Mr. Serjea:it LENS moved 107 a rule to .11111 CW cause why there should not be a new trial. It was an ac tion brought some time sit,.-.e 1., the Plaintiff, a banker in France, to recover the amount of several :bills of .ezcbange, accepted by Sir Frederick Mars. head Alibis father, while lie was detained as a pri soner by Boh.parte at Verdun. Toe defence was, that these bills arose out of a gaming transaction at Verdun. A large sum of money b 4.1 beta lo st . b y named E i t w i c k. w h o h ad an English Gentleman, :drawn bills on London, .10 whtch.Sir John lidunhcati lent his name, though he was not in the least con cerned in play. 'l'lie bills so drawn were not dis charged, and the parties were in danger of being sent ;o a close prison for non-payment of the debt. lo order to protect Mr. Estwick and Sir John Morsheae new bills were given, illicit found their way into the hands of the plaintiff. Mr. Serjeant LENS said, the defence could not De proved, because Mr. Estwick, the principal witness, was at Montpelier ; a verdict consequently went for the plaintiff. He had an affidavit made by the defen• Janes Attorney, who stated that Mr. Estwick pro. ceeded from Montpelier, after five years imprison ment, to Spain, and arrived in England last October. At an interview with Mr. Estwick, that Gentleman had stated that the bills were given to settle a gam ing tr insar!i-n. The C•itrt asked, if the Learned Setjeant had Mr. Estwid.'s ;ft.:lll6i Aral !). tog' answered in the negative — Sir F. Gins observed, that it was impossible, un der all the circumstances, to grant the motion. Rule refused. Wr.`,T s,. PAINTEII. Mr. Setjeant .ved for a new trial, on the ground that it was a verdict for the plaintiff, against the direction of Judge Heath, who tried the cause at the Lincoln .\s-,izes. Mr. Justice 1-it:a•rts said, the verdict was given against his direction, yet the plaintiff was metitori tu►c. It was an action to recover two guineas. The plaintiff was an apothecary, who attended the poor of the parish, and the defendant an overseer. There was a pauper in Lincoln, named Long, wkom the plaintiff had under his care ; the man required a skilful operation, and the defendant considering a surgeon more necessary than the apothecary, desired the plaintiff to desist from his attendance until after the operation. The plaintiff said, lie was obliged to visit another patient in the same neighbourhood, and as he conceived the man to be in want of his ascist ance, he should attend gratis. Under these circum stances, the Learned Judge did not know how the plaintiff was to recover. The bill was reasonable, and the parish ought to have paid him. The Court was of opinion thUt the verdict should stand.—Rule refused. , c, BltoOgsßY V. WATTS. This was a motion for a new trial in a cause tried at the last Essex Assizes, before Mr. Justice LE IlLanc, on the ground of a misdirection by the learned Judge to the Jury. The question simply was, whe. Cher she plaintiff, after entering into a composition for tithes with the rector of the parish. was at liberty to defend an action brought upon this contract, by plead ing that the rector had been simoniacally presented? Sir V. Gums agreed entirely with the directions of Mr. Justice Le Blanc, and refused the rule. MITCHAM COMMON. CRAM II W. PENNI:O,TM. Mr. Serjeant Bawr moved for a rule to shew cause why there should not bra new trial in this CAW, on the ground that it was a verdict against evidence.— It was an action under the, Goma! Iricicsure Act, to ascertAiu the boundary of the parishes of 11.itiding• ton and 13.4nd0n, in the county of Surrey. These were two issues ; the tirst was to ascertain whether the .brrundary set out by the Commissioners was, right ; the secrind was to prove the bound iry so set out was not right. and that it ought to be shotter.— rite tirst trAinclary took about '3OO acres Morn Mit cham Common. The Jury found tor the Commis sioners' line.. The great sufport of his motiol was an objection to the sort of evidence• offered by the Commissioners, but in fact there WAS no evidence which the verdict could stand. Evidence was received whichistOrt not to have been stctivcd. The C ininissioners produced de;iositi , ns t4k2n in a Chancery 6i:it, in which Sir Niel °la% Carey was plaintiff, and Doctor Tillotson, De of Canterbury, defendant. Doctor T.llor.on liv.d at the same tone Canterbury,in and on that account his evidence could riot appiy to the dispute at Mitcham. There _ _ were. in• the parish of Mitcham t. nr manors, viz.— *Mitcham, Biggins, sad Tainwoith, Foshal4 and Ravenhory. The plaintiff, Sir Nicholas Carry, was Lord of the Manor of Ravenhury ; Doctor Tillotson was Lord of the Manor of Foxell. The depositions; of these persons, which ar;se out of a bill filed in. 1682, were not applicable so the dispute between the: plaint i.ff and the defendants, and inadmissible, because: die original bill out of which the depositions arose could not be produced. ,The Court expiessed an opinion, that at had been customary to receive such evidence. Mr. Serjeant DEBT then observed, that thisease was of considerable importance, as the property taken from Mitcham Common, by those depositions, was worth iilBo,ooo. There were some points advanced in those depositions to which the Commissioneis had affixed a 'line of -boundary, embracing .8(10 acres of land, It was mere imagination that the boundary ever was in the parish of Mitcham. _ Sir V. Gurus observed, that he was far from thihk. ing the Commissioners ought to be put to the greatest difficutty to establish a boundary. There was some ! f law I. separate the parishes, andkit they made the boundary which could be supported by the verdict of , a Jury, it was sufficient. Mr. Serjeant BEST xrpeated, that there was no evi dence whatever to justify the boundary drawn by the Commissioners. The Court granted a xule to spew cause, upon the assumption of there being no evidence to justify the common boundary. AC RION FOR A FOWL.—EsCHALEZ v. STOKES. This was an action of trespass brought by the plaintiff, a respectable merchant, residing at Clapton, against the defendant, a taylor, and a neighbour, fur breaking into his fowl-house. and taking from thence a to.wl of thepheasant species, which be applied .to, his own use. Mr. SVrjeallt VAUGHAN, who stated the.case, said,: the action would nut have been brought, had the de .feridant made any thing like a gentiemanly curlers tiori for what the plaintiff considered an outrage. Mr. Eseialez, who.was partial to fowls, had brought from Luic.isliire several eggs, of the pheasant breed, which he hatched at Clapton, and !nought up to chi_k.•n. The defendant, who was in the habit of managing geese, took a fancy ro one of the phintifirs beautiful fowls, and actually cabbaged it, in the pre. sence the.plitiotiff's savant. Ile was requested to. return the.feathered bipsd, and he refused so to do; the plaintiff was, consequently, under the necessity ot.briruii4g .this action. flue Iletiaaleuit seized te. 'owl, and declared it to he one of hie own breed; but ve can prove, said Mr. Serjeant Vaughan, that the (Alines fowl departed this life, and that there was nu :: f rethe fowl in dispute. The object seising snot so much to obtain 'Triages as the ence action fo r vta to convince the defendant that the outrage was re ,prehensible. George Lodge said, he was a servant to the plain tiff, who kept fowls in a Mews at the back of his house on Claptcn Terrace ; his mistress give him se veral eggs, which he hatched ; the chickvns were of the pheasant breed; in December lart he was walk ing down the garden which led to the fowl-house, and he heard a noire ; the defendant opentA :he door iota the fowl yard, and asked the witness to let him I.wk into the house ? the witness opened the clour,and a boy, who was with Mr. S.okes, said one of the fowls w:ls his. Mr. S. then wet , t into the fowl house, took up one, and carried it away. 'lie wit hos followed him, on which Mr. S. said, if th • wit ness troubled his head about it, he would lurk him. Ike also d—d the witness and his master. The hmsl wthi worth five shillings. • There was no defence to the action, and the Jury round a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages ss. HATTON GANDEkt.—yesterday W. Harvey, J. 'bottle, T. nice, and J.Avern (boys), were charged by Gutidtt, a cor”tahle, with breaking down and cirrying away a considerable quantity of paling from a eArtlen solvating Tavistlck-sitiare, to make a bonfire It) bora Gar , , Ewe. •Ibuy were coi.viett d i.t the pell.tity of 104. i-sett, and ordered to make good the danne.te, or be coat mitted to prison, at, I whipped, agreeable to Act cr" Parliament. MARL'SOROV GU t•TRECT --Yesterday, Lord Herbert Stewart charged Rideau' Gimes., driver of the hackney coach No Or; with endeavouring to exact more than his fare, and with abuse. His Lordship had the coach front Oxford-street, and on alighting at King street, Covent-garden, he gave the Defendant two shit hogs, the fare bring no more than eighteen-pence. The coach man grumbled, and la's Lordship pulled out some silver, and de sired hint to taker his fare. The Defendant became boisterous, and a mob soon collected, and he told the Complainant that a man who refused to yay the fare was as likely to charge hint with robbery. The charge of insolence and abuse being proved, the coachman was convicted, under the last Coach Act, in the penal!) , of twenty shillings, in default of which he was coolant led to Br:deo/ell for seven days. . '1 he Corporal of Marines who stood charged with attempt ing to murder a female, by throwing her out at a tw-r pair of stairs window, was again broutzlit up and remanded, as the woman stilt reinaina in a dangerous state in the boyital. liow-sr It Vt..... sday •tt Jt.:l was brought to the Office on a charge which-will involve the question of appoitivng what is called private watchmen, and arming tly.:m with fire arms, to use at their discretion, the prisoner is appointed by some of the inhabitant* of Turnham Green to se-..tch their premises, and armed with a pistol and bayonet. On Saturday night Mr. Mtns, who has retired from bu. inets, supped in company wi h Mr, Gammon, the heatiltorough, and some other friends, at the Prince of Wales public-hooev, Turnhant Grew'. On tin it coning out of the public-house, the prisoiser attacked them, and said he should take them at into custody as deur:lady. Mr. GAntitun told hint to mind the business he was entpl,lyed about ; that he was a Constable, and it any thing was wrong he should be answei able. the prisoner, however, persisted, anti said he should take Mt. Mills ruts Clloro.ly, as he owed hilts a grt..!,e, and presented pistol to Its head, and while hr was raid tug it ..41 with lots hand, the prisoner Cal , lbcd Mr. Mills with his bayotier directly un ter his heart : he was conveied to a butote in Ins bleeding A:ate, oral Mr. Graham, the surgeon, was sent for, who on exalt:antic the wound, was of opinion, that had the wound been givcti i quarter of an inch higher, instant dea:hlllllit hay:- foll,twed Mr. Graham considering Mr. MiUs's bin in dancer, Wanted Mr. Bernie, who had a house in that neighbour:3oA, of the cOvurrestarice, who went, wlliout loss of time, to the house or Mr. Mills, on Sunday 111011 , 1114, and took his deposition an writing as to ts.e attack of the priaoner, who was in constp.or,; , - apj.rt hendtd by order of the Magi-trate. 'V caret day lie 1....0g1ir to the Office, and underwent another esitatinattur, soh , n a c.a.:tn.:ate bin pre.ticed from Mr. Graham, the suri:tott, tL a he cont.l nut pro iloitoce Mr. Mills but of dang.r—the prioant r was . conuautted fur ituther ruminatrvn Monday evening. at dusk, a fine female infant, ap parently three days old, was found by a Gent leni 311 in Lark-lane, Lambeth, carAully tied lip in a h mdkerchiel; it appeared to asleep when found, and was very neatly dressed in a Long cambric k (rock ; it was carried to a neighbouring public-house, and :ind is now in Lambeth wink-house, and likely to tie well; she has been christened Mary Lark. Wednesday sennight, about seven o'clock in the morning, as some colliers, nine in number, were th scending into a coal-pit, at the level near .Stout bridge, five were in one skip and lour in the other, when, shocking to relate, they had proceeded but a few yards Irons the mouth, a part of the machinery gave way, and they were all precipitated to the bottom, a depth of from 80 to 100 yards, and most surprising ' will if appear, not one was killed on the !pot, but their legs, thighs, arms, and many other bones, were broken in a shocking manner ; their situation can better be imagined than expreined, it being ten o'clock before they could be gut up, owing to no person being willing to descend the pit from the state of the ma chinery. The accident occurred from the cogs, which communicated with the fly-wheel of du: engine, not being properly secured after undergoing some repair. SUDDEN DEATHS.—Tuesday an Inquest was held at the Golden Anchor,•St. J ho•street, Clerkenwell, on view of the body of Mr. John Scotty. The de ceased on Friday last complained of a sudden indis position, and laid down on his bed ; shortly after' which, he exclaimed to his.tiaughter, who sat near him, 0 Lord ! what can be the matter with my head?" and almost instantly expired. Verdict—Died by the visitation of Gon. Immediately afterwards there was a second Inquest held before the same Coroner, on the body or Elizabeth, the wife of Thomas Poynter, a hackney coachman, who on Sunday tvening, as she was sitting on a chair before the fire in her own room, fell down in a fit, and immediately expired. Verd:ct Died by the visitation of Gop. A third inquest was held the same afternoon, before the same Coroner, on the body of Sophia Baxter, who fell down in an apo plectic fit the preceding day, and expired immedi ately. Verdict—Died by the visitation of Gun. A reward of Fifty Guineas is offered by Mescrs. COOPER and Co. Surgeons, of Charlotte-House, Black. friars-road, for the discovery of the Author of a Let ter sent to the Medical Board. We have seen it; the language is that of a Quaker, and bears the Walworth Postmark, dated June 23—a more scurrilous and in vective instrument we have never witnessed, and hope, for the honour of the profession, it will not prove the effusion of a Medical man---if so, it must arise from a grovelling sensation of jealousy at seeing a Society of independent Gentlemen, of the first respectability, appropriating a large portion of their time in alle viating the distresses of individuals, who may have consulted men ignorant of the profession ; we are at it loss to conceive the cause for such a libel. Perhaps .some of the author's patients have experimced relief from the Medical Board. We are authorised to state, that Surgeon COOPER and Co. are consulted by all ranks of people every morning until trine o'clock, and truni tws,ve till eight precisely. IttitTH. Saturday, at Plasm, Kent, the Lady Of Mains. Parte, V a Artilkry, atlane,ter. Tut ,, lay a f t , riloo rt, Lady Charlove Howard, doe 1.24 y of • Lea-,eh to:es linear 1, son at Mr. llow‘r*, on:Iola-op ;se VI till. Mk,. of 14.orfnik wa safety delivered of a IlUa au,l to the treat joy of that 'amity. IItARItIRD Oct. 91), tt Upper D. at, C tpt. It Uotierd•epa, of the Pr., Cbartot.e park :t, to M:si of Dual. At Petersburgh, Mr. Karon, 40ed 9s , to Miot K. Vorte aged t 3 year*, after a court .hip o f t h r ., s t . Saturday, at Orningt.sit, M L Raven, Puree it Navy, to Ml's Seosteatt, of Isrompton. iu Mr.. nt ighbout! The I.3dy's fattier being Clerk of •Ile rari.ll, b a j *sectioning tbe hat,.py union by prt.nottnctug" !titan." Sunday week, at footileton, ..ct..l 52, Mr. John bean, rti and hookwller, awl oau a the AI& lawn. Mr. Nicholas Chanticr, '.sitter, of Staplehorst, ha l 1,4 the misfortune of losinc, by death, hi. wit» Jnel two thil.lo they tette all boriel to "tie gt •tr- uw ountlAy. lift KblA,:'S IN the vArious comp' Icsks incident tV.c. frame, there are none more utea.tfol in their natt:re, n. alarming in their roncecriesorot. than the 04 AV ! . .1.z , :,: P.AIN, in the PACK, 1.0145, • BLADIibA, 1::%(;(). They are complaints to seh.en rvi ry ; i :4rr af 4: taWari.ut for every tido r species lA. ,; ; iLeal-abte N. Jrcire composisl 10 eta, ihtist gre,liews, has been noind of liapilar ee.s.tcy. in t h e v, plants; removing the calculi, or grin twos, ..!1•1 h.. every pernicious tendency to th.se olt 4 nivot. From a consc.olissese, ot the po . o.stial qua, f Pith, fully evitieeil by a private praszi,e are offered to the afllicf.d, rtconiniei u d 44 Lir tbove complaints. COPY ot . a LerrEit (r•%m GEORGE CORDON, Mr. URA MAN. Sir—Ravine been for above tweutv peal!. ,! with the Gravel, tiolt.n• pain, in ill.. t i; , c k, little ilitettillAiiotl, 2.1 d tue eXCiLICS2tiIt I attempted to niake water; and .t Itst ou t: w , want of rest and appetite. was scarcely dine to room. In hopes of relief, I bad, hum time to vnie, t, the best advice, and took the meat approved l'• - • Out being any better. Observing HICKM .N's P ! 1 tised as an eilectual core for the 'tone and Cr.11.1,..v.i of Urine, I used them this summer for ali.,tr li.o. front them found myself daily better, pos my v...11r t,, out pain t my apputite and 'vet:B.h rerort,l, ho! whack, which I c 0.4141 am; ill fur twelve ut.o.sl,.;,[ r c use of these Pills. Sir, your most ebedient set V•il!, October 2i. GIA;I2 t.flit I Sub- •bt From R. FERRIER, Esq. to Mr. li t , . - Sir•-1 believe lilek.MAN'i 1 ) 11.1.3 to ever known for curing the Gravel, thentore I have tali! Unity to recoron , ....nt! them. •l•wo bnies anti 4it an Ilia I have not •oun.l Ir nece,arr to Lam enure ; har PAD rcd great:y tr,nn thu .I.sor4cr, I Lan ntv i r of it, when I can procuie w good a reine4y. I am, ke. Hent.by, lie ir Yarmouth,l F kit Norfolk, Fell 19. Sold at Mr. Butler'r, Cheapsidv, corner or st. P o yard; and moat Ven .e .r., in E•1)!;114, land, W.tlet, East and West AnteticA, ia b. 9.1. tub M4P014 ADViL No. 13, iloae....ie-street, 17.11 street, Aliy NVHEN' Men of li.h.catitn: and Ili ()few() use persevering endeavours to distill/.r theism. ceitain eiettind of treating a trw Free lai w a.e., it, tul result of their experience is the be..• pro. f ot Fifteen years have se., devoted nor In e:tice to :be treatment of Three Insi-ders, and tie: complete ..acc • ing Olif plan, gives us addi! icin el I ardour to / T o t e a: min ble the ravage+ of those comp aims which are thr m. t of all the infirmi - tes to whiun the human ecin.caly c; After an atrliii•i.e.l introduct into evet y t,ranl. : Science, we determ.ned pract •cr, dividuals from the it ...mance ot one bleated turn, or dangerous precipunicy of a genera• ▪ Muni r. The elute 1 sorder4, to th: • we have& attention, tompr.se every sio..;ies of Ven4.-e.l of recent .ie l o ; .g ; all ;.10.1. of Ili clttncy, whether arisi..f, t -yen. - !inlet- or sets•:. the indulgercies set' inature ag., terruu.ta :14 in t wen; sometime% in consumpt , mi ; And 'a.tly, 1.1.11 d. - t a ..,(111 systeni m worn. n, wiiicli is called Sian enn. -14 many cases originating in a similar can:. Numerous diseases ar. .he rent of ignorance of h. treatment of a simple Gunorrluna, and it not uti pins that the seeds of we ate putsursed, lions th• of an unguarded thorny:it kly a sup. i !Jr n•-thoel, plaints are easily cured; and even whir teAtt • soave trust that we may elite ati cilectual restorallod. The litsi ases of the itrellira, a. litip.einly or arising front the above complairts, have not esi attention; by an infallible and insproetel lan, w. bled to remove obsirate.Cieets and ZstrlCtine*, w cent or of long duration, witianit resorting to ilie dangerous use of the eaus.ic bougie. Many in:;a1: adduced ot very inveterate cases, of several years r having yielded t— our meaiod in a few slays, r been art4.inpt-.%.1 by other practitioner. wi:liou ell rt. To be consulte." daily by Patients oi ethei .ea, delicacy, and attention.—Letters from trie couni! the par.:cuter, of Cie case. age, mai manner of a remittance, duly attended to, and advice and Me. warded :o any peat of the kingdom. GasS and Cn Niemhei s of the P %TA Colle•.•• of KEN JVA H. IT has been too frequently the ouhlcit of general reprobation, that men destitute of the Ara , medical art hive otlered therwelves as candidates :et tronage in the profession of Physic. For rhe onpose tice to the remelt of our studies and experiecce, and to from being classed among those empires whose feu; tensions have, unfortunately for society. b. en too fsv. seised, we beg leave to submit to the liberal and rill'., faithful statement of our pursuits and acquirements. After having received a regular medical education, as of Messrs. Grindal aad Blicard, whose lectures aral carefully attended, as Professors aad Surgeons of the Le pital, we entered ourselves as students in t' at jurey school for ntedical acquirements, the r!oy.il Crave' 'burgh, and were instructed to the different branches I Surgery, the 'Theory aid Practice of Physic, Chem. wifery, botany, Zac es:e. dtc. by those eminent Prot,. Mourn, Gregory, 1.11..e1t, Hadilton, Duncan, and if We trust we shall out be deemed presunTteous In 12! our proficiency and acquirements are nut mantis!, Having for a long series of years made Vetirrial C and the various diseases of Debility, the particular our studies and practice, it will, we hoer, lie ailow43l th acquired superior knowledge of their treatment am slight and recent cast; of infection, a perfect re,4•4131 , completed tr. the short Ferias' of two days. and is fl utmost inveteracy, where other prictith sera Egos 13i maii, a pre per rerstvertizce in our plat of L:33Uns»: the pal lent a safe mid radical cure. Amidst tae melanctOy varict) , rkt . d . tsoraws rh i c h sects of a habit long and most unhappily pursued by t! both sexes, there are none more alarming or more distil those di fieleneeits and debilities which trequently prev. bitter the matrimonial stato. l'u such per-uns it auto soling refketion to know that they 1113 f urw, hy a new ithie nsu a ot treatment., be restored to than greatest of blessings, a strong, manly, iitel vigm out eonsti,ut ion. I of debility, front whatever cause anstoig, AID well as in cies sot venereal infection, we may he consiii,ed byr either sex with the greatest secrecy and honour. Hut sultation at house from ten to three, and from sus in tl till ten at night. "t'ents w the country are requested to state the pal their case, age, and general bah!' of bring, 6.c. Inclo>iis! lance for advice and niflicines, othen the same will it: : sh tentl e tt ac iSaol co lao u n i .y i . r ul f r'a o urt r n i dert : l ed tba ic ki i . i l l ilk ! ini . . dhecntiP°lc. aa3t° o. lettero *nay Le CURRIE am! Co. Surgeons, No. 107, Itatinal A-0 , 400N:. Printed by Levet. KIWI. Pieka: F plibliiked tberc, an :et the atar (Act, Ignoyisl 14 - fid of Mr, . . re brir • hvtr, irt Ole etto,,J, t •,-;;;; I , ••t dreii - • .: La tt tit 0:%; , , Iti . 0); 01 t - A • .:•. • —•- rir w , • , y A :. Go • :.! Qua I . Cc , t 1 1 11. • 0., Ct tit (1 ro V, th) ry. Illr I IL11111.•(•• Carr : bt. LUULR. • -.1 1 , 4. 13 y i 11( 1 166:), X , 011.11 tkid (J he ✓ 4 • I wt:; t \ 1 ". 1.• he tt wbc!i.i D be , 11.• 14 111 :!t t-r c *! ittel - .1! fJri ma:4 1411.!,6' 1 recc.eti t Re I . I * r. „ I ! •rt , lie tare 1.31 rt.i: ti. • ejell ter, CAS - 411j4 uelotl4 wit e.itt:nt itt• an silt , t pC.:Lc -1- the of 111 I ,,ee:::,;:t ant couraNy re• CC err 3 ter as the prptb in, tot Ire 441 tw y re of r.k:)at.• at 4:34 N; an le 1 , 2) -•p, 7 .11w ••• 14 It! Care. •-; du h.',..tunt••• lose of tiled G! • • ;.re it,. e s- be rod , 4 t reing tf•AO Vert ur cit.* i.t bc a cm , - w at ,d It a!I Novel In an I eVi q Li 6.11 eat utcf wt:- Ea xiik't r 11. to INN