Star. — London, England, 1818-05-20 00:00:00

1. 4 1 P % . 41, \ • • :a._ 9 % 1 911, 9 . • 91 was not in the l ltvt lecFtioeiptet a proposition of this kind' nibinlnt”or:illad he heard a Word of it until his arrival at the House this evening. There was no adequate reason assigned for it, though some possibly may be collected from the circum stance of her Majesty being detained in town. An important part of the subject, he thought, was the consideration of the Windsor Establishments, with a siew to their reduction within proper limits; and also a due provision, not only with respect to the :vent of the demise of her Majesty, but with refe rence to the more important contingency of that of the Prince Regent—( Hear, hear, hear.)—He should, \-ov:ever, further suspend his judgment, until he should have seen and considered the measure, of filiich, on a future stage, he should fully deliver his sentiments. 'With these reservations, he concurred the first reading of the Rill. The Earl of LIVERPOOL conceived the go posed measure to be one to which no objection, in point of principle; could be entertained. His Noble and Learned Friend had stated, that after the Bill was read the first time it could be printed; and he thought the most proper course would be for Noble Lords to suspend their opinions until they could fully see the measure and have it regularly before them. It was, however, impossible for him to let one or two points pass which fell from the Noble Lord, without saying a few words. The Noble Earl, he under stimd, felt no objection to her Majesty being allowed to add a proper number of persons to her Council ; but he wished to know why it was proposed to do it a different mode from that proposed by the Re. gency Act? In that Bill, the Council, though all official men, were not designated by their offices, but name. The Lord Chancellor was not appointed one of her Majesty's Council as Lord Chancellor, but by name—as also in the Lord Chief Justice, and' the other Members. The Members of her Majesty's Council were therefore limited to these individuals; and it was expressly provided by the Act referred to, , that if any of these Counsellors should die, her Ma jesty, by an instrument under het hand and seal, should appoint a successor—and in point of fact, her Majesty has in one instance exercised that•power.— He stated this with a view to shcw how far the prin ciple already obtained; though he would admit it as matter of proper consideration, when an extension such power was proposed. The Noble Earl oppo- site, however, seemed to admit that Ministers may be fairly, warranted in providing - for an extension. The principle being already acknowledged and acted .ipon, he did not see what possible objection could exist as to their following the same course in the .vent of any addition being agreed upon. With re gard to the question of the time, and the extent to which the general subject should be reviewed, he re marked, that circumstances might arise which called for some alteration ; but it was not therefore neces sary that a view should be taken beyond what the necessity or the expediency of the case required. By the Regency Act two ways were provided to meet lie event of the Regent ceasing to exercise the Royal power, and the other provided for the case which re• garded the care and custody of his Majesty's Royal person. The Regency was placed on the same foot ing as the Crown, in the event of a demise, that the Parliament in being should continue, but if dissolved, that the last Parliament should assemble, in order to provide for the exigency of the case. The law there fore, at present, with respect to the Crown and the Regency, was the same; but in the event of the other illustrious Person's demise, during the exercise of the Regency, the allotted functions would be in a sort of abeyance. The Noble Earl's idea of rendering such regulations or provisions perpetual, may be felt liable a strong objection; but all that was now proposed was to provide for the meeting of Parliament, in the event of the particular case, as was already provided in the case of the Crown's demise. With regard any farther provisions, no necessity whatever exis ted, as the Act had already provided for these con tingencies, in authorising the Council to exercise the necessary powers and authorities until Parliament should assemble. With regard to the • particular measure proposed, their Lordships would judge of its necessity or fitness under all the circumstances of the 6se; and he thought that whatever difference of opinion may be entertained now or herefdter, the con sideration of any further revision, or more extensive amendment, should not be a ground or reason for their Lordships withholding their assent to the parti zular measure now proposed, should they think the ground upon which it proceeded fair, just, and rea sonable--(hear.) • Earl GREY spoke shortly in explanation. He ob served, that what the Noble Earl had stated with re spect to the authority possessed by her Majesty under the existing Act, related merely to the tilling up va cancies in the Council, which was dissimilar to what was now proposed, which went to provide for the adoption of several new Members at once to the Conn - With respect to the other points, he could not regard the Noble Earl's statement as satisfactory, as caiitiously abstained from assigning any reason as J the necessity of the new measure. In one of the lauses of the Bill referred to, there was a provision continuing the care and custody of the King's person in the Council, notwithstanding the demise of her Majesty ; and he Still thought there was no ade istc necessity assigned for the adoption of the mea sure now proposed. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that on occasion of the second reading he would state all reasons which warranted the adoption of the measure, and fully answer all the objections he had heard against it. The Bill was then read the first time, ordered to printed, and read the second time on Thursday and the Lords to be summoned for that day. Lord ERSKINE said, that for reasons which he Ad already explained, he now proposed to intro nice a bill for declaring the law with respect to ne power of justices of the peace, to apprehend and hold to bail, or commit for libel, bcfure any bill of indictment was found. The preamble of the bill stated, that whereas doubts on the law had arisen, and the bill v.ent on to declare that the Magistrates `lad uo such power. He moved that it be now read first time/ and should move the second reading on is day sdn►tight. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that in putting questiOn on the first reading of this bill, he wished it not to be understood that he entertained Any doubt much longer, it would at last come to such a pais whatever on the subject of the law. that no Minister would be ;able to face the difficult,: What had happened in other c o unt r ies spewed what The Bill was then read a first time, and ordered to be read a second time on Tuesday next. was to be ' expected if the currency of this cottatty COTTON FACTORIES. was net restored to a sound and wholesome state- , The House went into a Committee on the Cotton What had happened in France during the circulation' of the assignats, in America during the war, and Factories' Bill, when Mr. WARRtx having been heard what was now going on in Russia, shew what we' is favour of the Petitioners, and the question being mit lust he expect it the present system R e d ontinued. put, whether Mr. FUR/1180N should also he heard, Lord KENYON opposed the hearing, and Lord In a the value of the paper rouble had. now ROSSLYN supported it. fallen to one fourth of its original value. The House The Earl of LAUDERDALE chewed, that Lord ought,, therefore, very seriously to consider the na- Kenyon had determined before he came to the House tare of- the system to which these postponements tended—. For his own part, he could hardly believe not to hear Counsel, and read a letter from his Lord that the Bank and the Chancellor. or the Exchequer ship to that effect. His Lordship then argued, from the impolicy of the measure, and the mischievous were really sincere in their expectati o n that cash pay effects it would have on trade, that the petitioners menu could be resumed next year. ought to be heard. He proved that the evidence Mr. HAaIMERSLEY Maintained that there was no reason to suppose that the Bank and the Chancel . before the House was contradictory and inconsistent, if not false in the highest degree, and thence urge' for of the Excheque r were insincere in their expects the necessity of admittin evidence on oath, tion, as well as in their de s i r e, to resume cab pay- Earl MANYERS was g in favour of hearing the pe ments at the period fixed by this ;till. The causes dtioners' Counsel. a:sigr.ed fur continuing the Re s t r i c tion Ict another ycer, were, in Ina opinion, quite sufficient. The Bishop of CHESTER opposed the hearing of " I Counsel, on the ground that the simple question was, ir. TIERNEY - wisheel to ask a question relative whether Parliament would protect those who could to 'the transactions between the Ba n k a n d Govern not protect themselves--(//ear,. hear),—and who- r mem, but was at some loss in doing so at pre s ent, as they children should be permitted to work more than the Chancellor of the E xc h equer was tro t i n his place. ped twelve hours? He had seen the misery ofthe Factories Ile ho ,however, that the Honour a ble Gentleman himself. e n ft n e a Lushington) would be able t o gi v e hi m t h e-in- The LORD CHANCELLOR,sfter observing fiat tion he wished for. His question related to the 9,000,000/. of Exchequer Bill s due t o the Bank. the law of the land already sanctioned a degree 4 At an early period in the Se ss i on provision had been interference between employers and their workmen, as in the instance of master and apprentice, and that made for the payme n t o f 6,000,0001. o f thi s sum , parents might be compelled on application to a Ma- but no vote had y et b een p ro p ose d f or t h e rema i n i ng 3,000,0001. He t h ere f ore w i s h e d to k now w h at ar thatgistrate to treat their children properly, contended, rangement was i n te n d e d w i t h res p ect to t h e 3,000;0031. sel ; the Learned Prelate had given his own evidence it was but fair to admit evidence and hear Coun- and whether it was to th e p a id i n t h e course o f t h e and ought to hear that of others. The evidence before present year? The 3,000,0001. had been advanced by the Bank without interest, and if that aunt was the Committee of the House of Commons was most 'contradictory, if evidence it could be called at all. repaid the Bank would be e na bl e d to di m i n i s h i ts i s • The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that all evidence sues. • - Ile was the more anxi ous to k now w h at was to be done as to the repayment of the 3,000,0001. be thebefore Parliament was contradictory, and mentioned cause, in the event of its being paid back in the pre-, evidence on the subject of the chimney-sweepers; sent year, and the issues of th e B an k cont i nue d at he therefore thought it inexpedient to enter into an the present amount, it would be the act of,the Bank investigation that might lead to endless discussion: and not of the Government ; and e k gArlit' akai be thought they had already sufficient evidence be would be responsible fo r t h e consequences of istrapug• fore them to come to a decision, which did not turn on any matter of fact that had been disputed. He up the amount of thei r p a p er i ssues to t h e present enormous extent. But if the, Bank did not issue this doubted the inference that the Noble Earl (Lauder sum again as fa s t as i t was pa id i n by Goearrantert, dale) had drawn respecting the mischievous effects then there would be rea son t e think they were earnest of this measure on trade; he thought it would have in their preparations fo r r e sum i ng cas h pa y ments . no such effect ; but if it should, that was an o the r He presumed it was i n t en d e d to p a y o ff t h e t h ree question for consideration on other grounds. Trade millions between this and ne x t Christmas; hut upon could not be improved by overworking man o r c hild, (Hear, hear, hear.) this point he wished t o h ave i n f ormat i on . • Mr. LUSHINGTON, in r eply t o t h eAtt ei t l ts i o f The Earl of LAUDERDALE said, that if labour the Right H onourable an, was vnalifed - fo were regulated at all, reference should be had to the - state that arrangements nett for payier off personal strength of each individual, and no general both the 6,000,0001. slid the 50000, . ..en precise res rule could be relied on.--The empl o y er was t h e per time of payment was n o t yet s e tt z Xseto *hat son most likely to be acquaint e d w ith t h e different degrees of strength posse ss ed by hi s wor k men , an d the Bank would do in uencp theatireintelte most likely to avoid over-rating them, w ith a v i ew to that was a P eri s cd Y t queitaleieSut he had his own advantage. He a ga i n i ns i ste d t h at t h e in- no doubt. that thee/nee of thaeßunk would be consistency of the evidence already p r od uce d sheaved guided by their de s i re t o resume that patefehts as soon as circumstance s admitted.- --1 •••• ee the necessity of hearing the petitioners. Mr. TIERNEYee-It retuned then; me /*had sup. The Marquis of LANSDOWN agree d t h at a great sed, ai evil did exist in the exce ss i v e labour of children, and po that the three didlionr w ei t e t e b e rep d. But whence was that sum to be paid? Noprovisidiated 'that it would be p ro per t o i n t ro d uce some measure ailer on the subject—but he w as th e more conv i nce d t h at yet been made bi. the House for that petrpose, • ' 1 the petitioners Counsel and evidence ought t o be had any vote for it bees hithe r to p ro p ose d, heard, and that the Ho u se s ho u ld not l eg i s l ate i n t h e Mr. SAMUEL THORNTON sa id, it - was emit tainly true that prevision had been made try...tbe dark. He did not, howeve r , f ee l an y appre h ens i on on the round of the mischief which it w a s alleged House for paying the six milli o ns, but th at no suc h gge the measure would produce t o t ra d e , th oug h i t might rovision had yet been m a de fo r the th ree Milli o n s . &h alter the course of the m a n u f ac t ure ; an d thus ren e Bank had applied to the Ch ance ll or o f t h e Ex dered it the more necessary to hear e v id ence on the chequer for r ep a y ment o f t h e l atter sum, an d h a d been assured that it w ou ld b e p a id i n the cceirseof subject.—The question wa s the n p ut an d carr i e d i n the afire rative, when it was agreed that fu rt h er ev i- the present year. As for the responsibility which the dente should be heard in a Committ ee u p sta i rs to - Bank would incur with respect to their issues after morrow.—Adjeurned. the repayment of thi s sum , he for one was ready to meet it. Certainly some measures were necessary 'on HOUSE OF COMMONS. the part of the B en k in order to prepare fo r the re , Lord RANCLIFFE present e d two Petitions, each signed sumptio n o f eac h payments ; but whether it wan the by twenty inhabitants of Nottingham, praying for Reform, duty of the Bank to retain the sums repaid to them Annual Parliaments, and Universal Suds Re and or- by Government without re-issuing any part of them, tiered to lie on the table. The East India Shipping Bill was committed, and the Peu. was a matter for future consideration. As to iihat tion presented last Session on this subject was referred to the was the precise amount a the issues .. .which the Bank Committee.—Report received, and o rd ere d to b e ta k en into ought to make on suc h an oc . cas i om no mesa meld further consideration at Friday, and the Bill to be printed. give an opinion. But by pea dent send disentennot- The East India Marriages' Bill was r e ad a second tune.— Ordered to be committed on Friday. duct on the part o f t h e • B a nk, a ll the dangerTnilllCh it Petition was presented from the Parish of Newhaven, the Right Honourable Gentleman thfr,Tie cipateJ might be prevented, and eke l iac rn o TeVsalt, against the Poor Laws' Amendment Bill.—Read, and ordered they would be prevented. ' to lie on the table. Mr. O. BUTLER presaged a Petition from the Parish of . .. . St. Mary's, in the town of Kilkenny, Ireland, praying for the Mr. TIERNEY said he never meant to say that Repeal of the Window TA, and other Assessed Taxes.—Read, any precise sum could he fixed upon'beyond which i ' and ordered to lie on the table. the i ssues of die Bank should no t exten d. All that ' The Sugar Bounties Bill was read a third time and passed. he meant was, that it was necessary pared. should those issues The Glass Manufacturers' Bill was read a third ti me , and should be dimi n i s h e d very , much from their present ,' On the motion ?or the third reading of the Savings Banks 13111, amount. As to the precise eatent'of the diminution Mr. W. LAMBE objected to the clause for enticing the no doubt the Bank themselves were the hest judges. deposits. As the Bill now stood, it was not allowed to deposit A t present the issues were excess i ve an d oug h t to he any sum above 100/. the first year, a n d 5'.;:. it each succe e di ng reduced, and the respersibility of lowe r i ng t he m to year. Many cases might occur in which l a b ourers m i g h t b e enabled to deposit larger sums. He moved that the objection. be proportioned to the vt - ehts• of the country rested able clause be left out, and one inserte,!, amhori.ing the de- with the Bank. At preee nt he would not press the posit to the amount of too/. the first year, and 501. ever y sec - eubject farther , as the Chancellor of the Excheque r ceeding year. was not present. But helmist observe, that till now Mr. LUSIIINGTON said, if the Hon. Gentleman was l really desirous of the amendment which he proposed, it wou ld. the lip ise had never r i c tilyed an y no ti ce o f the ap be better to postpone the third reading of the Bill to some future day, as his Right lion. Friend, who had introduced this Bill, Stl' il sai . lane. was not now in the House. • • Sir M. W. RIDLEY hoped, as the Bill bad been some time Mr. LUSHINGTOIt--The reason why P the a li under discussion, that the third re a di ng would not be postpon e d. cation had'not been m e ntid ne d was,' that the matt es' P After a few words from Mr. B. WILIZABAIt, General THORN.- was stilt undereriatibubeitveen the Bank and hi s tow, Lord Laaceta.r.s and Mr. Goat L ANGTON , the furt he r Right Hon. Fri l Buce was quite sure it was in consideration of the Bi l l • The Slave Trade Bill was committed, and th e R eport re- tended to pay or** lie ge Milli ons. ' ceived, and ordered to be t a ken i nto f urt h er cons ideration on Lord FOLKESTONE said, that from th e w ay t h e Friday, and the Bill to be print e d. Restriction had been ren ew e d t wo years ago, and was again renewed, he despaired of ever seeing cash Mr. P. MOORE presented a Ictition from certain Proprie tors of Drury-Lane Theatre, setting forth that a large debt had p n a o y vi ments renewed by the- Bank. • The Bill was then read a third tithe and passed. been incurred by that concern, and praying that a Bill might he brought in to regulate and secure their interests.—Read, and ordered to be referred to a Select Committee. On the motion of M r . BENNET , certa i n On the motion of Lo r d DEERHIJEST, the Worceit e r G.. 3 RETURNS FROM PUBLIC •OFFICES. relative to the F ees o f. Cl er k s of Assize , and other Light Bill as-as read a second One. Returns, Mr. FINLAY pr e s ente d a Petition from th e S enatus Aces. relative which w ere or d er nd-some'tAme • ' ago, were or- Copy of Glasgow University, praying that th e i r r i g h t to a Copy of Publications might be protected.—Read, and order ed leered to be made fortliviraie to e printed. . Mr. BROUGHAM cent plained,..that a similar on b RANK RESTRICTION'S. de- for the p r od uct i on o f papers f rom the Tax Office, The Bank Restriction Bill was r ea d a thi r d time. ma de long since, was aoeyet complied with. M- WYNNE eibeery . 4 that it was a very gross On the question that the Bill should pass, Mr. FINLAY said, that although he admitted that . b see re m aCh ' d of duty, ehan.slan,..Clerks of Public Offices the resumption of cash payments by the Bane would . necessarily be attended with many inconveniences, Ru e d now to coralcierite hardly necessary to make yet it must be evident that the longer the resumption s o ereePtaeathe Hrmse till a s e cond order was made upon the sulo'jeet. The persons who wet e guilty' of this neglect ought to was delayed, these difficulties would increase. The tie called to. the Bar of the House was now called upon to postpone still further the period of resumption, and if this was continued; H ouse and pnuished. . Mr. BROUGHAM said that he would before now / 41 i lIE 'WV thi at 1 T 1 I so: SU 1111 CO Vie als e VI !CC tit i 10 P. t 'sh( . Nth 4 SCI , 1 po . / • poi 2111 wa the I . Lo Sect 11. ' poi his stilt , to but in ger offs by one by the Cot . t and tits Ijest she Ma He i \ cipl an Of I site be Th 4 ups exis eve 1. gar 4 whi um for , 1 sar: nee the 1 ' the you i gar' 4 11 .. pert ing Par i that pro fore il i . R 6 F illu: /lei she; regt to a was eve] . . for to h ted, ting . TIOCI shot Ines its 1 1 the °pit side t 22111 eld CIIII . . gro: son: . s 1 sets spec the cane was ado] cll. Tegt be e tot! 111 clan fort - Feers i 1, 1 Ti 4 ' • t sure T the , * the t - mea • bear T , i be F next L P had duct the , holt indi • stars and had a fir 4 . this ; T 1 the c .• .. , .., . have moved twat the Clerk of the Board of TAze called to the Bar, to answer for his neglect but ta., he had been informed the delay vc.l occasio ne d i, the great diCculty of obtaining tit: returns. 1.3011 A S toft)::. Lord A. HAMILTON rose, pun cant to his no to move that this per s on be discharged from Netru c; e , 'From what had passed in the House on the 0tt.... 01 for depriving Fergusson of his olio:, he collects:4 that the general feeling was, that snilicitut puzi,ll, meta had already ben inflicted sad c ljt they were now disposed to deal morriCil:y %tit}, especially as he had ackiiowledg- , nn erc , therefore did not anticipate at.y i , l , KcLo r tr, rao. tion. He moved—That Thom- s Fer . ?.issre !•••• ca:htd to the bar to morrow, and discharreil. Mr, WYNNE said, that as :he fir , ::: ; ; a i,,, A7 decided not to take his view of the p.iLisl.roetsitCat ought to be inflicted *a the psrtcr qee: should not oppose the view wtiri: might be• inclined to take of tr.is mrrion , was certainly a strong circumstance in 1.wr, 31 . p c , rat. son that he had acknowledged his guih. Wlwn subject was last before the House, he . aal. whether he intended to ground any gen.c! 41 on the motion which he had FirJpo , 44 !3 ! :t for the dismissal of Fergusson from ots• that time he stated that he did not rizer ,:, forward any general measure. Bet sideration, he thought it was a quenion V7e;:4 ing the considcrat:on of the HOJP!. nhether Visions of the Ats now in free Clelks in the Post Office, etc. interferi E r i n ought not to be ester.ded to Officers of the A,lefi r j Taxes ?He threw out chic now fcr ems:Jen:in of the House.—The motion a as then :Inv.: tc. PETITIONS POR IREPOP.M. Lord COCHRANE presented a Pcti!ion J a Burgesses of Paisley. The Petition prayed fc.r Reform and Universal SuffrAge.—lt W. 1.1 braght up, read, and ordered to lie on the tabk. Lord COCHRANE then presented sir sim i l ar Petitions from Ifaacheger, three from Faldi, 2 , se from Pollockshaws, one from Royston, and en hum Iluddersfield, and several from various other plAtes, —They were read, - and ordered to lie on the table. • IPARLIAIMNTANT arson.% Sir R. HERO rose, .pursuant to his notice, bl rime for leave to bring in a Bill to repeal the Sep tennial Act. He hoped the House would do in tine justice to recollect that he had never before had the presuMption to call upon them to agree to any mo riot of his; nor would he now !:..re come before .them but from a strong sense of daty. when he Fez. ceived that the Sessionlad advance.l v. such a without any motion on the subject being in forward. The subject was one which hats bean 410 frequently discussed, that he need not net. pass long upon the time of. tLe House, even if his health had been such as to allow him to do so. Os vat ions occasions. the House, convinced of the p..=r fnl reasons in favour of the 11,forrn which he pro posed, bad gOrie a• great:way z -wards erecing it. At the dose. of the. American war the suaj was stron_ gly. pressed upon the Hoax. The crAsloct of the Ministry at that time, by conttnning the w‘r in opposition to the wishes of the nation, gave such strength to the cause, that it h a d t h en neai : y tri umphed. Afterwards, however, it had reiapta, but WAS again brought forward with sery fair ilT 4 .4.eiti, cal it suffered most severely hi the defec:;ott of us most able *advocate. Then came the French Revo lution, and from an appeal to the transactions had taken place at that time, the enemies et lt , ilan had successfully opposed it. The cause was reco vering from this blow when it was brought iito repute by those who are the worst enemies of a derate and constitutional reform, and by those p . sts which had been so much exaggerated.' These obsta cles, he believed, were now nearly quite returiv,.!, .The machinery for the constructionpf plots, if nut altogether destroyed, was so much damaged, that it was not likely again to produce any explosion. Who the Grenville Act was passed, the corrupt state of the Representation was admitted. So far as that Bill went, it had been extremely beneficial, and it was unfortunate that the House had not „rue further. Any Reform proposed from hi his side of the House was always opposed, on the ground that the time nas im proper. If it was left to those on the other side, he feared that the proper time would never come. In the-tinae of .prosperity they said it was neediest, and in the time of adversity dangerous. But it was en objection to Reform that those who wished for it wete'not agreed as to the plan of Reform. Another oljectioti was, that the Constitution Ivas perfect and needed an reform. Neither of these obActions Lad any. weight. But• the most forrnidaV,e ti all objec tion's adduced was the consequences of the French Revolution: If this were dispassionately consideted it would be found perfectly unfounded. It was veil unfair to argue to revolution from reform. It kras only necessary to look to the character of the pe . 4.e of tngland to see that they never had been i ~..:.cd to anarchy. In the troubles in the time of Char:( I. very little blood was shed on the scaffold; ncr woa;i that Monarch have been sacrificed hinkse` not front a convictionaM..:4 the people of that he co u ld not b e trusted. by any pArty. gument that Reform was attended with d 3. • not be sincere ; for those on the othcr • urged it made no scruple of sheik& or •• the Constitution when they thought it c•.' Reform, in fact, was essential to t!.e ,ver and was the main principle which .tie; When the power of reforming . itself the Censtitusion would be.entirt argument as to danger, howevtr, the side of the friends of -Ref,- ln or. .lttaY. The urger Oa :I': Of its : 1 -1 OA' Leg...slat. tieitivctien opponents.: Whit had OCC.tfi.. Poland but the sad mistake by •al of that country was.preventea from ry:ortrii —{/year, hcar.l=-But the ki-d Newrin w:ti,h. now proposed was not attemiAl with danger. He did not wish for Annual Pal liarnents. although s : tch had certainly been at one time the settle,: C..uuttu' tion of the country. It• was not until ..-he time of Henry VIIL that Parliaments had ceased to be an nual, and to be unlimited in their duration. lestvin it in the breast of the Crowu to continue (heat a• lung . as was thought proper—(4cr:, ;:err.}—lit the time of Queen Mary Annual Parliaments were truned : but it was not till the Revolution that the dmatien of Parliament was filed by the Statute to three years. The way in which Triennial Parliautcots were dii cuutiltued was well known. llad it not beta to caau Goc cite c °Om pollC' With ma I A " the " Sept c whc . . l dc Teami wen aid Moen the ii cient but ; the ii aorni • uer lec t rug plan • fer tions telov case F un' vidu, terie K2t ar.d tl.' ae 1 tc:ri r.rie Ti vas th it of ;t1 /lift earl rity. diri. the he r frier look he I lie lie rd: heal ever 11r04 SO I fror the infe frog Pc" ore fee 0u Aa till g rc to he to Kh thc tin H , el, talked I.fr, sc.v it T '.. ,•: ~:d • who I