Star. — London, England, 1828-12-18 00:00:00

F -,- - . -.- in the public line about ten years ago; my property consists of the rents of some houses in St.Giles's,which is nicknam sd " the rookery ;" I have only a past of the houses there, ten in number; some are in Lawrence sines, where I reside, and others are in IStickridge street ; my tenants are not generally of the female sex ; tie houses are let out into weekly tenements ; there are " nightly " tenements in the neighbourhood, but none of that description belong to me; I have none that are let out at threepence or fourpence per night; I don't take single women for tenants; I have got sixteen leasehold houses in Golden lane; M r. Woolley was my former attorney; a Mr. Jones and Reuben Martin had deposited some stakes in my hands ; a man of the name cf Griffith was to walk a match against time, and Jones and Martin each deposited 501. in my hands; I heard Mr. Jones say he had lent Reuben Martin 501. Mr. l l Banbury is a saw-maker ; I had known him for some years; I don't think I had ever betted with him ; I be lieve I was stakeholder for him two or thaee years ago; the reason why I did not go to Mr. Woolley as my attorney, on being arrested at the suit of Reuben Mar tin, was, that he was the attorney who sued out the process against me; I don't recollect having any paper given to me by Mr. Woolley, which I afterwards took to the defendant; it was not on my first retaining the defendant that [paid him the 21.5.. Mr. Isaacs prepared the affidavit which I swore in the Common Pleas; 1 think be read the contents over to me ; Hanbury showed me the defendant's bill of costs on him, and pointed out to me the charge of 91. Os. 4d. far the business done for me ;I had paid 14,1. 14i to Mr.Woole-, ley, at the request of the defendant. The defendant said he would do no more business for Hanbury until Isis bill was paid; and would not give up my papers until then ; my object was to get my papers, but the de fendant would not give them up till the whole of his bid on Hanbury, amounting to between 501. and 601. -was paid ; that • bill was taxed down to a very anis& sum, about 51. I have not got my papers yet ; I hared been served with no demand for payment of •the 171;1 costs of the application to the Common Pleas; a paper was brought to me, and Mr. Isaacs told me that I should have to pty the 171. but ho demand' of it has ever been made; I did not know that when 1 paid, the money I should get my papers. Re-examined—On seeing the defendant's bill of costs, • Hanbury and I went to the defendant, who then said' that he considered Hanbury liable to the costs ; that was the first time that he had ever said so. By Sir J. SnARLITT—I never instructed the defendant' to bring an action against Reuben Martin in the untie of Hanbury. Hanbury and Fireman confirmed the material parts of the pro.ecutor's testimony. The former expressly denied the allegations in the defendant's affidavit, and swore positively that he did not instruct the-defendant' ea defend ti . .e action against *Lai en at his (Hanbury':) own risk and expense. He admitted, in cross-examina tion, that he had, a- few weeks before, instructed the de fendant to bring an action for him against Reuben Mar tin, to recover a• sum cf 501. Mr. Le Blanc, the Master who taxed the defendant's bill of costs on Hanbury, and reduced it from between 501. and 601. to 51. stated that he had disallowed she cots in the action—Martin v. M Lasen—and in another action—considering that Hanbury was not liable to pay those costs. • This was the case for the prosecution. Sit J. SommEre (with whisrn were Mr. Brougham, Mr. Sergeant Adams, Mr. Comyn, and Mr. Chitty) addressed the Jut y for the defendant, and observed upon the want of probable motive of the defendant in coot n.itting the alleged perjury. The Learned Counsel, alter commenting at great length on the evidence for the prosernti , m. stated that he should call, as witnesses fur the defendant, the clerk, Tyler, who was present at the first interview between the defendant and the pro secutor and Hanbury, and another person, who would prose, in contradiction to the evidence of the witnesses Tor the prosecution, that Hanbury, and not the prose mos, was the person who employed the defendant to defend the action at the suit of Mat tin. A letter from Hanbury to the defendant was then put in and read. It was to this effect—" I have to re :quest that you will make out my account by neat 'Thursday, and I will not fail paying you; also to re quest that you will make out Mr. paying account, and 1 will have that sealed ; and as you cannot go on without funds, you must, of course, stay the proceed ings until I see you." •. A memorandum was also put in, purporting to be a copy of the preecipo in Martin v. M 'Laten, in which the action was stated to have been brought in die Court of . Ki°g's Bench. This paper, it was stated, was ins nished by Mr. Woolley, the art •rney who brought the action, to the prosecutor, and was by him taken to the defen dant. The object of.this was to show that the mistake in putting in bail in the Coust of King's Bench (the ,action being brought in the Common Pleas) did not originate with the d.fendant ; and that therefore it was iatpsobable that he should have made the promise de posed 19 by the prosecutor, to deduct from• his bill of costs the expenses %Well the prosecutor had been put to. Walter Tyler, examined by Mr. BKOVOHAIe.-1 am cyst k to the defendant, and lived at his chambers in Clantent's-inn, in 1&6; in October of that 'year. the prosecutor and Ha nbut y can e to the defendant's them. bets; I was tl ere at the time ; the psoaectfior stated that an action had been bre light ag einst hirn - by Martin; and be wished the defendant to put inlaid for him; Hatsbp y said he wished bail to be put iivat his (Han bury's) expense, and that he would pay thetosts.; Han -ha:7 said that the action was brought for 501. stakes ; t'.et prosecutor was a mere nominal defendant, and it was 1 is (HanLur)'.-) money ; he said•be himself had a elains against Martin to, .501. and wished the defendant to bring an action fax him to recovreahat sum; thede asenclant said he d.d not like to bring such an action, as he thought it would not be tried. Hanhany still wished it to be brought, as be said bethought one action would settle the other. The defendant then said. that as lie silanbury) wished it, he would bring the action; and be a 1,4 pia/wised to put us bail for the prosecutor at. liaabury's expense; Hanbury replied, st Then I am your pqrnatter, and will pay your costs." The deism. dant had been employed by Hanbury on many previous occasitms, but other p. rsons were the pasties in the bu oasis; one of them was a permits of the name of John atm, and lot him, and also for one Ostsby, a foreman .1 Hasibusy's, Hanbury paid the costs; in November, 18 , 26, the prosecutor and Haubuty came again to the defend ant's office, and pros acrd a prescipe ; 11. wairthen paid by Hanbury to the defendant; another pound was paid by Hanbury on the Ilth of November ; the ale fen dant% bill of costa was delivered to Hanteury oil the 15th of Mooch last; Hanbury merely said at that t me Vat he would attend to it; subseqnently, in April or mar, he said he would pay the amount, and that he only wished for time, as there wese other panic. eum Coned who were to pay a part of the costs, a sum mons was afterwards taken out by Mi. Woolley to tax • the bill, sad on my takiss it to Hanbury he said he had given no-alit !levity for iss ►eis mime owl, Cross-examined by Mr. GURNEY-.—l can't say oil what day in October, 1826. the prosecutor and I-fanbury came to the defendant's cffice. We make entelies in our books, but I have not got the honks here. There is an indictment pending against ate upon jlfe affidavit which I made in this matter. A Sheriff's officer's assistant stated, thatia November last he served the prosecutor with a copy of the rule with the Master's allocatur, frr the payment of 171. which sum witness demanded. The prosecutor said he was not prepared t.) pay it. A person of the name of Bennett stated, that some time in the year 1827 he was present at thedefendant's chambers, when Hanbury stated that the money for which the prosecutor had been arresud belonged to him, and that the prosecutot was a mete nominal party. He also stated that he (Millbury) was to be the defendant's paymaster. A great number of witnesses gave the def-ndant a, good character. After Mr. GURNEY had replied, and Lord TENTER DIN summed up the evidence, the Jury retired to cot . sider their verdict, and on their return, after being it. deliberation an I , eut and a half, pronounced the deten dant Guilty.—The cause occupied the %hole of the dal. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. GUILDHALL, Dsr.. 17. RAT e IIART. AND OTHERS V. SROORMAN AND oTHERS This was an action to recover a sum .14.660/. claimed by the plaintiff. as the bankers of the Cliffdown Mining Company, for the balance cf an account due to them from the defendants, who were members of the com• pany. It was proved by the documents which v ere produced, that the defendants were directors and pr.- prietors of the company during its esistence; and by other evidence it was proved tbat the balance of the account between the plaintiffs and the defendants wa% in favour to the lot mer for the amount claimed. For the defence,it was contended that the actin could not be maintained, tipon the ground that the liability of the defendants had ceased ; and to prove this, evidence was given to show, that two of the defendant* named Child and Lawrence, had given the plaint , ffs notice, that they had cease.' to act as directors, and that too other persons had been appointed to fill the vacancy occasioned by their secession from the direction of the Company. The letter, giving that notice, was signed by the Secretary of the Comrany, and was subse quently acted upon by the plaintiffs, and they answered checks 'signed with the names of two persons Mho had succeeded the defendants, who had withdrav n It appearid that at the time that these persons withdrew, the balance of the account between the Company and the plaintiffs was in favour of the latter l'2o/. but that in a few days afterwards it was turned in favour of the Company to the amount of 401. It was further stated that Mr. Child, before he retired, had transferred his shares to hi, son, who had since disposed of them to other r ersons; and upon the strength of this evidence it was contended by hi. Counsel, that he at least could not be liable;ss it was clear that he had ceased to be either a director or a proprietor. In reply to this evidence it was contended that the dtfendants Mere liable upon the ground thet they had held themselves out to the world, as partners and that therefore they must take the consequences of having given 4 credit to the Company by the respectability of their own names. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE told the Jury, that the only question for their consideration was, whether the defendants had held themselves out to be partners? A number of points of law which had been raised in the course of the cause his Lordship reserved for the consi deration of the Court. The Jury 'having retired for some time. returne3 a verdict for the plaintiff, damages 4,6601. declaring that fsom the evidence which had been given in the case they were of opinion that the defendants had held themselves out as partners. - PREROGATIVE COURT, Die. 17: PIED V. PIED. Sir J. NICHOLL gave sentence in this case. This was a suit respecting the will of Mr. John Bicknell. of Brad ford, Somerset; the testator died at the age of St or 86, baChelor, leaving a sister, Sarah Bicknell, older than himself, a niece, and four great nephews and nieces. The personal property amounted to between 10,0001. and 12,e001. and the real pi operty, except what was entailed, visas worth about 2001. a year. In the event of an in. testae y,the property would be divisible as follows—One third to the sister , one third to a niece, and the rem ain • ing third to the great nephews and nieces, four in num ber, each of whom would be entitled tonne twelfth ; die testator left two wills, one dated September, 1787, all the legatees named in which, except the sister, who had a legacy of 3001. had died prior to the execution of the second will, now propounded, dated the 13th of Ser tentber, 18 4 27, ten days helote the testator's death. By this last instrument, with the exception of some spe cific legacies to his sister and others, entitled to dis tribution, the whole of the property, teal and per sonal, was b equeat h e d to Mr. William Bird, the de eeaseti's nephew, alto was named sole executor. The party coning this will was not the sister, who' would be entitled vi one-third, in case of its being annulled, nor the niece entitled to tl.e saute proportion; but the stale opponent was Mr. John Bird, brother of the executor, who would be entitled to one twelfth only ; but it came cut in evidence, on an interrogatory jut to Mr..) lin Bird's son,, an attorney, that the real opposer of the bill was Mr. John Bicknell, l a great nephew of the deceased, the heir at law, and inheritor of the entailed property, but who was not entitled to distribution of the personalty; instead of Mr. John Bicknell trying the validity of this will at common law, where a viva wee examination of the witnesses before a July afforded the most effectual way of detecting fraud, he set up Mr. John Bud as the opposer of the will in this Court. This was an extrat?rdittary mode of proceeding, and not calculated to creAtt a favourable influence as to the opposition.— The will had 'been regularly executed, and attested by three respectable althea!" who, if they were believed. prc.ved the case; the ground of opposition was the im paired state of the deceased's intellects', and the bad charactet of the drawer of the will, an attorney of Wel lington. The capacity of the testator, the Learned Judge thought was satisfactorily proved; and suppos. ing all that had been so industriously raked up regard ing the charec.er of the Atturaey, for many years back, to be true, the taaasactinn did not depend upon his testimony aloe', and was supported by a variety of circumstances. The charge of fraudulent conspiracy, Winded ott the state of the deceased's affections, his capacity, and the alleged control exercised over !limbed failed; an 4 the whole cane had bees conducted with so much acrimony, and itichsidert so *such irrelevant mas ter, that is pronouncing for the validity of the will pro. pounded, he must teadeala Mr. Jahn Bird is the tau of the suit. • 1 1 11119 ES POLICE INTELLIGENCE. NI A IfSION—IMUIM I L Twe 'Moen or Motteu.— A boy, 'tamed Amenlend, Who ap peased to be between 13 and 14 years of age, hut mid !bet be was Robes open" 18. was' beauttist before. the Leas tlnvoes, &wird with having tumbled about the streets blind shook. and broken a shop window. ' A watchmen stated tha t be saw the bo y staggering abodt the streets in a state of intoxication. At liras erisness thought him MI. as be could not suppose that so mere a child amid haw* n an excess of liquor. The tiny. however, soon eshibitrd take such cal proofs at the state of his isead,by dashing it up ag.inst a window. The witness, finding it was alt up with the young fellow, took him up in his hand, and put him to sleep in the watchhousr. The whole Office were astonished at ibis statement, sad eke Loan MAYOR, after having expressed his surprise and regret at suck an instance of youthful debauchety, asked the watchman whether he bad ascertained what the toy had drank ? The watchman said, the defendant acknowledged that be bad; drank gin, rum. and beer. The LORD MATIIIR (to the defendant). Pray what did you drink. that put you into so shameful a condition? Boy—Drink! why I &inked gin. and rum. and Meta. The Loan Marna—What do yell mean by Meal? water! B u y—Water ! Goo love yoe, no good strong heavy wet; every body knows what it it. The Lome Alaroa—Do you know in what a shocking state of drunkenness you were found? • Boy--Ash, I believe you ; I was groggy, that's truth. The Lotus Maros—.Where did you get the money to pay for the drink?. Boy—Eh! what's that you say? The Loan MAYOR—Why 1 suppose you think you are speaking to as drunken a fellow as yourself ; don't you know that yew are before the Lord Mayor? Boy—Augh, to be sure I do. W ell. I g ot the money from Mr. Ledby ; he's a brace maker, and I 54.11 s braces myself ; I axed him for there bob, and he gived it to me ; I vas well enough till I took the heavy. and that made me lumpy. The Login Slave/a—And what do you expect to come to if you continue to lead this life? Boy—l'm sure 1 know nothink about It; we none of us knows nothink about it. . The boy, in reply to other questions. which were all answered in the same unmannerly strain, said that he was independent of Mr. Ledliy,although be was in the same trade, and that be was carrying oat business for himself. Ile LORD Name's asked whether he 'was able to pay for the glass he bad broken? Bay—Why no, I can't pay now, for I hau't net a mag ; but If the Charley comes with me, gi' him what you wants of me. The Loma Mayon ordered that some inquiry should be made about the pour friendless buy. Shocking as the picture was, so comical was the tone in which the defendant spoke, and so cher was the resemblance of his manner and language to the experienced blackguards of the town, that nut to laugh at the scene was • impossible. Six ascertain/tors appeared before the Loan Mason, to complain against the Salesmen, for having sold to them sevetal bushels of sprats, which were nut fit for the use of the human body. Thy stated that they bad paid the great cairn of four shillings a bushel for the sprats, but they were not long in the possession of the fish, when they found then► stinking, and quite Impossible to be eat—(A laugh.) Mr. Guldbant (the Clerk ul the Market), said the complainants had the CA to produc.l, and requited that the stuck should be brought in. The complainants exposed some to view, which were not of in viting appearance, certainly, hut they wire not avast , ' to the nose. Mr. GoWham said, that he bad watched the manteuvres of the complainants. and had contyletly detected them. '[be fact was, they bad all purchased of at► early boat. at 4s. a bushel, hut they 'bad scarcely been supplied lint' the fish. when other boats arrived and sold at 3s. They then iorn►ediateiy began to knock about the fish they bad purchased to make it look stale. But be had brought a dish of sprats which bad been taken indiscriminately from the quantity boated. and he had himreN never tasted better. This he bad done in justice to the Salesmen, who were is this case much calumniated. The Loan Maros', and others in the Justice Room, tasted the sprats, which disappeared in five minutes. The defendants were quite puzzled at this mode of exposing their scheme for getting sprats at a shilling a bushel less, and walked of after the useless kw of their time. GUILDHALL. The Solicitor to the Apothecaries' 'Company attended before Mr. Alderman sxo►ws yesterday, .trs i ellow cause why the said Company refused to reimburse the churchwardens of St. Ann.' Bistkfriars, certain sums which had been paid as rewards to Bre men for bringing their engines to extinguish a fire In a chimney in the rear of Apothecaries Hall. The Solicitor objected that warehouses and manufactories were exempt front the operation of the Act ; and it was obvious that if they were not exempt, such buildings as the glasshouses. from the chimnies of which the Mimes might be seen to issue nightly. would be continually chargeable with these rewards. The chimney in question was not in a dwelling house, hut a factory', and was so constructed as to burn itself out without danger. It was 90 feet high ; no sweep could cleanse it, nor could any engine throw water to the top of it ; and if there bad been any necessity for extinguish ing the fire. the parish engine in question would bate been about as serviceable as a garden syringe. The Alderman, on referring to the Act, put it to the Solicitor 'whether the premises in question were not included in the mean ing ot the terms, '• the tenant or occupier of any house or building wherein tuck Site begins, - Ac. and finding that this was the first time the chimney had been on fire since it was built six years ago, expressed a hope that the Company would not require hint to make an order, as the demand was not likely to be of frequent occurrence. The Solicitor, on this intimation of the Alderntan's opinion, consented to pay the demand. BO W—STR [CRT. Noca AUCTIONS is TIM STSAIID.-A pale, toplooted. brown coated, youngish man, was ushered into this office yesterday mot n ing, with several others, under the guardianship of an °dicer, charged with creating a row in the rooms of a mock auction shop in the Strand, a few minutes before they had taken him into cus tody. The prisoner bad interrupted the ro-t rum orator in the dis charge of his public duties, and _bad the crowd that he had pur chased a watch at the shop last Saturday for 275. that was nut Wadi twopence farthing. Mr. Josephus Levi, the mock auctioneer, protebted that all the prisoner had said was false. He had the honour of belonging to **Jewish persuasion, and the religion of his sect did not allow him to mount the rostrum on their Sabbath Day--ergo, he did not mount the rostrum on the day alleged—ergo, the prisoner was wrong. The prisoner now said that it might have been at the other mock auction shop that he bought the watch. -The Jew and the primmer were then sent about their business. In the course of his address to the Bench the auctioneer said, that be was aware there was a stigma attached to these auctions. Sir R. Blame—Aye, and they tacitly deserve that stigma. Mr. heard, a solicitor, was brought up on an assault warrant, charged with having assaulted John Chandler, a warder of the Middle Temple. It appeared that Mr. lazard and a Lady were proceediag togs ther to the chambers of a Barrister on Thursday eveniug, when tbteomplainant requested the latter to take off her patens, the 41ripetIonp of the Society Ming that no one with pattens should be allgored to pass. , ladr. MIMMULL—That is not an order dictstod by much ;Ala& 'try, it must he acknowledged). Mr. lewd refused to let the Lady take off her pattens, and in sisted upon proceeding, which the complainant refused to suffer. 'A audit then ensued, and as the complainant swore, Mr. Isoard 'struck Mm. This, however, hlr. Isaard and the Lady denied, although a young man, servant to a Mr. Tucker, stated that be was whams to the assault. Mr. blooms. Inquired if it were the intention of the Society to go to the Sessions ? Their Solicitor said, they were determined to assert their right, and compel obedience to their orders. Mr. Isaard was then allowed to enter into his own recognisance, for his appearance at the Sessions, where he stated his determine - then of going, whether or no. Tus Wanness Roaster.—Johns lime, the man charged with, having been concerned in the burglary in the house of Mrs. MereD.' OK was busily curtained. The evidence given on the foam occasions was read afresh. . - Hannah Morley stated, that she was servant to Mrs. Baker, who, keeps the Swan with two Necks at Finchley, and remembered that, on the evening of the rabbet'', four men came so her inhume; door, and she served them with a pot of porter and pipes ; the pri soner was one of those men ; he called at the Swan twice after wards—once to purchase a cow, and once in a lish-cut, when ' was taken into custody by the gardener, Lawrence. Mr. Woolles —Would yqu know the Other three men, if ; were to see them? Witness—l should nut; the prisoner looked at me when I gave hint the porter, and I looked at him in return. Thomas Harris stated that he wet a labourer; he, on tbe.rright of the robisety, saw four man paw through the turopike-pte Whetstone. with pipes in their atooths; the •prisoiser wee one, the men. and the m.n convicted at the OM Bailey was another. Mr. hlissnuth, upon tbii evidence, ordered the prisoner's com mittal. • Btesue.---Daniel Heath, alias Jobs V. d, the litturney'a Clerk I . . who has been so frequently ezambled, was finally take his weal. On this oacasion two of his wife's sk s l er elielalitti4 ._ 4 h a ving been alive a month ago. -rimed h i , 1 M A It ?.LA-BIN N ft. Rosastsv AT Till Fecirco AGIBAtSA D .It' , N—Sevi,r4 11:reeallighiraFtalig011iettrrrummailisiam.,1:111dIblafrvde:liateltasdibs:imti:ht eialluPp itt Pi c ni4 h tte a he r ret g 's e leieeclill e ag i lkilliau gh li t ah y k la f r ag: s s : ba g i" :7 74l4‘ ,7 l : b :g„ llATlJP 'l. l4:l4 ,set of %imp * for which one cemented with bins was if 1 2' ki DEN ...bated se the Howse of Correction for „, `'• a > having reeeheeri a midges lent nee in consequeme of m e Z s , t.. 1 0. ' had since been charged with ring - dropping . and the e tk •" Ile 'dart ha &amended with tepoted thieves. cet 1 . Nary Bailey s the still roam maid, deposed that she he imed prison. r was ;orient near the room in which the plate tray kept the day of the robbery. ft atm appeared, by tie ,t,,,,,, i i 1 ', some of the prisoners relations, who were reptant,,, nano', that he had given a false accou nt of the manner in eri-.4,,."ef. Ils time tit the night of, and day foll owin g , the robboy, ,7 i , was /emended. - David Watson, Isaac Amory, Henry Hr.dahlw, sa g i ta a Moresby, were appreheuded, awl were sing ly brought h 4„„, 7 4 Bailey, and Ildward Stephens, the sadler s . b?y, who .4w t en; come up the area steps of the Ambassador . house, 0 t k e ., i , the robbery, with blue bag. filled in their poswiti.in; but At y cy ant idenally them. Them four men had bee:/ in the b i t.,,, ui, elating with Langford, at a public house in liethrial•gretn, elsewhere.—They were all detained. QUEEN-SQUARE. Yesterday George Barnes, George Lamb, John W , e , Frederick Krause, Mary Bailey, and Mary Baker, %amenity : A' charged with bnbag open the premises of Mr. Bliley. iu W. worth-road, and robbing the house of a quantity of proptn) was proved that Krause and Haley pawned some part of the perry at Messrs. Graham and Ravenois. iu T.thiiktreet, 41 , 1 were committed for trial. Bailey and Weaver were ctuaittt4 l the House of Correction for being' reputed thieves. The rest ~ discharged. HATTON-GARDEN. Sarah Soli? was charged with fraud and perjury. The pri4l l ,, on the filet of last month; said two pawnbrokers ticket, shawls, to a -Mts. Dirket, for siiitepence. Mrs. Barrett, time afterwards. west' to the pawnbroker's in Gray's lan Ia take the shawls out. when she learned that tlte prisoner hal, there before her, and by swearing that she had lost the tickrti o taisted the shave's. Theriot/wr deu , ied that she sold the beton Mn. Barrett; and as to phe oath, she said, that a/hough administered to her, she did not take it. Mr. Sergeant Sanute— What do you mean by saying you take the oath? • Peisoaer—f said nothing. Mr. Sergeant Selman—OKl you not kiss the hook ?—Yes. Mr. Sergeant Scu.ori—'Yuen you to ik . tbe oath. The Learned Sergeant sod, that triflimg as the Joioun?‘ the prisoner was charged with fraudulently ohtaintne, yet curnstances attending it, were of such a nature, as to to-rit ample being made of theOß prisoner iii'-STIL ihe e ms cumnutted. WSET. SEDUCING FEMALE CHILDEIDIo—YCIEArd-iy Wm liforith 40 yea; a of age, who state I hint.elf to be s. man of bid:, property, was brought up for esamittatio I on several eh, bathetic conduct towards a number of female ciiidren. A mined Sends Siedosao, was charged with being All *mkt% number of young gills. between nine and Pair:ern yeas gave evidence of their basing tutu seduced to the pri.oner'f ings, and stated the...particulars of indecencies thutezete.itne horror in all who beard them. The NLeouisare observed that the offence at law Illiedemeashaur ; but he hoped, for the honour of the : was without a parallel. Ile should require two sureits each for the mak prisoner, and himself in 23Sal and two 504 each for the fem ale prisoner BET,; .S, and 45t our li'l%s' notice of A 31 Yesterday two resurrection men were brought up George's watclahouse. They bad been followed from / house by an immense mob, who nulled them all the threats and filth, and missiles of every de-criptian ; placed at the bar they could scarcely be recognised as hun They complained loudly of having been marched tin streets by the constables at the risk of their lives, though offered to pay fur a coach. The constables in their defence said, that had they put metre into a coach it would certainly have been broken the low Irish of St. George's were mostly interred in tt yard from which the prisoners had been taken, and they incensed against them,• that it was with the greatest diff constables were enabled to preserve their lives. It proved, that about two o'clock in the morning, the con a spring cart outside the church-yard, and on going in die prisoners at work opening a grave afid two watr short distance looking on. They tout :be prisoners and found they had the-body of a child in a sack, ant tided with a number of sacks, apparently intending to Several bodies. Dm watchmen accounted for their not having t.ki Mien Into custody by saying they were afraid of being , The prisoners were committed UNION in HALL default of bail. About a fortnight ago, a poor woman named . that her husband had been committed by the Magi ford, for parochial rater, owing to the Parish. S.w sa:l, v.- was then in Alaidato tie Gaol, fur the sem of .€3 6s. the orii,ff.,l rates only amounting to Al 13s. U. the remaiuder torero the rs. pense ot putting in a thanes, and other steps tak.n 1:k money. Yr. CUAIIIIMS, the Magistrate, de-ired her to speak in the 1 84 Authorities, as be was inclined to believed that stone militate 5.l occurred in the business. The ease was reported In the Papers, and a Gentleman •ei!liti in the Isle of Wight, who saw the repot t; remitted a check on ki Loudon bankers fur the ansount above stated, requesting the VW trate to send it to the distressed family. The husband was liberal erase s a ft We wesel a a ,d,,,„.„ llVerih r• .010 1111.1 , 1 -... acted, atm 1 ,1 I g %with tytk. icon h ow lav e d the N O' dt k ept " nt•t to of !ami n o_ Ads L 4. : "eat Yi ant A I Oa ! MI at AO 4 iLloa r g s oma "rote us e net N twri a vg Ihe ti tle 4 &OM r mid slitiOgi Out to y tors Fete, 44 Strand. taken, • At Newt' e ezatuet4 justice , iu roper y, i t salons, t of to, p t • been tai et, Allay the ago 001.1411 w te of tbe he roe Swim The prig:m a citete !*e nett, a dna ti lan Fne,r alga ner had ie tiCkrtt,vb, * ar o the cars* dela' tough it and wok "kb I ; you &deo mull tube dune SO Cher ant was thick No; I f, yet :'ie street -Mt an ta, Of Red. teem and 0 •otreiv, abeet In but t bide, en,ea :ral cltage. A ...-- n. A wor.aa ccomplice. I tt yeas a - ri•on,r . , 104 in[ :teal one atM •bap; law was !)....t a wide the onnntry, c w ish uref its at two.uretist b rae et of bail. tech duet it op from k Das h font the wat‘ g aga the way et held as ; and eke t. human help goe pi ed through tta pots bough they hi tors i 'ley put the pi. an , token to pAs; saki ml in the therA they ad they were a T :eat difficulty tie 1. It was tka to constabke at s o d ins in they watchmen at its into rusts* a is , and were pre fees bog to take awe p oo boa tken there , fah being MUtdeft teli eats Rose comlAkri tam gi‘trates of Dey pat Sat: that trate to woo is so ..... on Tuesday last from his thraldom, and restored to his faz•iS I. which consists of a wife and seven children. • SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. I) HUNTING. fr Ilaioneon, Dec. 16.—The Subscription harriers threw off a 04 a Patc h am yesterday, and enjoyed much diversion ; they ran nos brace of bares, the huntsman and whipper - in displaying conside 1/4 ble tact. Colonel George Wyndham and his Lx•tings are in this neig bourhood. They met a field of sportsmen, the most numerous 01 id the season, this morning, at Toddenhant Wood, which they elt.,gg as without effect. At New Wall a fox was uakentielled, that u: b circuitous course kept them in brisk play for some time ; but wl.t k escaped by eattbing. A second member of the brush gibe t given and was giving delightful exercise to man and horse, will night-fall occasioned him to be abandoned. d, MATCH AT GOLF. j The Golf Match at Edinburgh between six chosen woollen „ the Six Feet Club, and an equal number of players selected free it, the members of the Burntsfi.tid Links Golfing Society, which ha g be excited so much interest, took place on Saturday, at.d, atter a in 4 contest was gauged by the Gentlemen of the Six Feet Club, by la j ge- less than seventeen boles upon the match of thr:e rounds. en play was excellent, and the day being uncommon ly fire, a r 4 he number of spectators were upon th ground. The plAytri be opposed to each other by ballot, and the greatest 1141411914 r Y tailed throughout the whole match. ita ' ' Hopcimported from — V. - 1) Dielren's Eland are "j ' 0 1 in. 'superior a quality as to have sold for 8.. a polo) s I. On the Bth of list month , as a lab( suer was rOn nf : I ird ea, ing the soil of a stone quarry io the neighbourhood 3 , u Huddersfield, on the supposed site of the ancier.t Cam• bodunum, he discovered upwards of 1 34) silver alrjr P ety per Roman coins, which appear to be of the era rt 13 1 latter part of the Dictatorship, and the reigns of J 0 3 iht, and Augustus Cwiar, as many of them bear effigic. nee inscriptions of these Emperors, as well as of tiooe Ina- many of the Generals and other great men of and P l ' vious to that time. They seem to have been c oitieJd rich various provinces of the empire, as some of them ha war Egypti in, others Grecian characters on them, mire with the common Roman letters. It is singulAr oho out of the whole, there are scarcely two alike, and mo., bat, Fs V3ll 3 • of them seem to have been coined at such a dist Ant pri. of the empire, as to preclude the possibilitT 'ter- having ever been in circnt..tion in B r i ta ir,-11'evro he lead Advertisch - • Toe DIED. On Saturday, Hugh lawman, of Auchtyfardle. lave At Penzance, Cornwall, William Gore Langton, F..q. -c• man Commoner of Magdalen College, os:ord. right a t HI G w ATER at LONDON-BJ(1E1GB TO Mott I, se of Morning tr. Murrain • eons- Lovuom: it.ted and Publi•lted by Jonti s46 M ma a u e ln : uu e gt , eat t ‘ he tttl i ecLl F lrt ' :lerk at the Sr* s throb, No 1, Pickett place, Teo•pta Ii aIL so ei tt