Star. — London, England, 1824-12-18 00:00:00

EPISTLE FROM A YOUNG LADY TO HER BROTUER, 'ON VIZ EVE OE HIS EMBARKING AS A CADET TO INDIA. Scottos, Inverness-shire, Nov. 27, 1324. Vareirell to thee, my Brother, and my Friend, Nay happiness on all thy hours attend. May fairing breezes waft thee o'er the deep, And ev'ry stormy wind be hitsh'd to sleep, Till thou hast safely reach'd the Indian shore, Which fearless Gama sought in days of yore! When thou art far from Albion's share remov'd, Oh! think on those thy youthful heart has lov'd ! Let Mem'ry oft recall each friendly face, And ev'ry well-known spot of ground retrace. If, wakeful, at the Out hour of night, Thou should'st behold the Moen serenely bright, And watch, in pensive mood, her silver ray, In brilliant sparkles, o'er the water play ; Then, wilt thou see, with vivid Fancy's eyes, The same full orb o'er rillickoan rise : Across the bay her soft refulgence throw, And all the mountain-scene distinctly shew ! Where, distant far, iiimlayan mountains rise, And stretch their lofty summits to the skies— Should Fate thy wand . ' ing footsteps thither bend, Each hiU shall seem a well-remember'd friends Each steep ascent presented to thy view, Shall seem a Highland-hill which once you knew. Some shall appear Cuckullhs's lengthy chain, Another shall Bert Leurvon's shape retain ! When passing thro' some lonely Indian vale, Where od'rous shrubs their balmy sweets exhale, And spreading banians waving o'er thy head, Form, with their branchrs, an impervious shade, Think of the plains that sate thy earliest days, Which first attracted thy young infant gaze. Think of the fields thru' which thou wast my guide, To where the winding Severn's water's glide: Or the deep shady lanes thro' which we stray'd, That led us on to Crombales verdant glade. Oh! let each shelter'd path 'bro . which we walked, • Each mossy bank on which we sat and talked, With fond affection be rimember'd still, Thro' life's oft-changing scenes of good and ill. Then let the flame of Hope fall brightly burn, And paint the happy day of thy return; When, in thy Parents' and thy Sister's arms, Again thou shalt enjoy Home's quiet charms: We at thy absence shall no more repine, But gaily laugh, and talk of "ilia king syne !" M. BP D. LAW ItErOfir. COURT OF CHANCERY, DECEMBER 17. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL W. TUBELFALL. This was an appeal case, and the only point of in terest in it, was the astonishing sum spent in litigation. The matter in dispute was a spot of ground about six feet by four, on which the gable-end of a cottage was built in Lancashire, and to which the Attorney• General made a claim in right of a Charity, the endowment of which was contiguous. There have been bills and ar guments in Chancery, more than one issue tried at law, and the proceedings at present is for another issue, or a restraint of a former issue at law, after an expense, it is said, of £7,000. The case is to be further argued on Wednesday next. COURT OF KING'S BENCII, DECEMBER 17. THE APOTHECARIES COMPANY V. BENTLEY. This was an action on 55 Geo. 111. to recover penalties against the defendant, for practising as an apothecary without a certificate from the Compa.py of having passed an examination, and not having been in practice on or before the Ist of August, 1815. Mr. SCARLET? stated, that this action was brought by the Apothecaries Company to enforce a very whole some law. The statute,on which it was founded was passed to protect the public health against the may practice of ignorant persons who might impose on the unwary, and made every man liable to a 'penalty of £2O who practised without a certificate of qualification, un less he should be in the practice on the Ist of August, ISIS, when the Act began to operate. There would be no doubt that the defendant had practised ; and there fore the only question would be, whether he was within the exception which, by the case of " The Apothecaries'l Company v. Roby," was held to be restricted to persons actually in practice on the Ist of August, 1815, and to extend to persons who might have acted before that pe riod, but had ceased to act as apothecaries ? Now he would show that the defendant was not very likely so to have practised—that he had been apprenticed to the trade of a whitesmith, had become a hardwateman and travelling auctioneer,and had been made bankrupt before 'restarted as a surgeon, inGeorge-street,lla mpstead-road. Of his literary qualifications the Jury would be enabled to judge from a letter which he had written to the So• licitor of the Company on the subject of the present ac tion. In this letter, he spelled practice, practis ; weight, naught ; profession, pro, icien ; most, ntoust ; and per haps, props. (The Learned Counsel read the letter, pointing out these and other peculiarities in the spelling.) --.The Jury Would recollect, that it was not mixing a draught, or compounding a bolus, which made a man an apothecary, but the maintenance of an establishment, and the ability and opportunity of making up the pre scriptioos of physicians. Unless the defendant could prove such a practising as this, the plaintiffs would be en titled to recover, and would only ask for a single penalty. Susanna Male, wife of William Male, living in Park street, Regent's Park, said, she became acquainted with Mr. Bentley in 1822, when he lived at No. 4, George street, Hampstead-road, and produced one of his cards., The card expressed that Mr. Bentley, surgeon and ac coucheur, would be at home till nine o'clock every morning. He had a shop, fitted up with shelves and drawers. Being ill about the autumn, she and her sister in-law applied to him for medical advice; he felt her pulse, and told her she had an inward complaint, and a decline coming on, but he would send some medicine, from which she would find benefit. He sent some pills and medicine in a gallipot, which were taken. She found herself no better, and went to him ;.he said, " You must not expect to get better directly, because it is an inward complaint." She and her sister continued off and on to take medicine till Christmas, when she grew much worse. Once she proposed a physician, to which Mr. Bentley objected. Once he gave powders, to operate as emetics, and directed them to be taken every three hours, how ever violently they might operate; she took one; it operated su violently, that she believed if she had taken another, she would have died. Afterwards she had a swelling in her head, and took more medicines. Her sister took medicines till April, 1823, when she died.— The witness left off Mr. Bentley's pills, wa3 cupped by another surgeon, 'and got better. She afterwards re ceived a bill, which had not been paid, and took it to Apothecaries' Hall. On cross-examination, the witness said she had mentioned the defendant's name to others, who bad employed bins. Wiliam Wile, the husband of the last witness, proved that Mr. Bentley attended him when ill, and supplied him with medicines. He also shewed witness a book, from which it appeared he - bad also followed the busi- ness of an auctioneer in 1820, all round the country, and had been in partnership with Mr. Davis. Thomas George, from Park -street, said he met Mr. Bentley at a Methodist Society, in 1822, when he gave him one of his bills. In consequence he went to Bent ley's house, and he gave him powders, which he was to take every six hours, for a pain in the side; but he did not recover. One of his eyes was weak; Bentley put powder in it, and he had grown worse and worse ever since. Mr. Bentley said he came from Derby, and had practised there before he came to settle in London. He came to town about nine years ago. • Cross-examined.—The medicines were put into Mr. Male's bill, who was the witnesi's snn-in-law. Re-txamined.—lle said he had practised on Winless's wife, which was not true. John Hall, of Bury-street, Hampstead-road, proved that Mr. Bentley attended a child of his in the latter end of 1822 and beginning r•f 1823, but the child grew no better. He sent a bill of 11. 16;. 3J. which was paid. William Crow said Mr. Bentley attended him, and endeavoured to persuade him he was very ill, and in a galloping consumption; his brother would go off in a gradual consumption. lie sent pills, and the witness found himself Norse; when Mr. Bentley said, " That is what 1 want to convince you of "—(ii laugh ) He let off the pills, and applied to another surgeon. Two other witnesses prisved that the defendant attended them when residing in George-street, Hampstead road. Mr. SCA lILIETT now proposed to trace the defendant's history. Mr. Wood produced a commission of -bank' opt, dated the 17th of November, 1821, against the de fendant, as a hardwireman, dealer and chapman, and said the bankrupt told him he was then practising as a cutter of corns, The examination proved that the defendant had been trading as a hatclwareman for five years before June, 1822. Stephen Davenport said, in 1803 he was at Derby, when Bentley was apprenticed to Strutt and Co. as a whitesmith. He might then be about 18. In 1817, the witness found him living in the neighbourhood of Moor gelds, making up parcels of hardware, as if for sale. This year be went to see him in George-street, where he was practising as an apothecary and surgeon. He shewed a book Co exhibit his practice. Mr. Edward Foz proved, that in 1811 the defendant worked as a whitesmith at his mill, and continued to work there in 1812. Mr. Roberts proved that Bentley was employed, from 1801, for seven years and a few months by Messrs. Strutt, first as an apprentice, and then as a journeyman. Mr. Robert Ward, of Derby, proved that Bentley was in the employ of Warner and Co. at their mill, from Michaelmas, 1814., to Michaelmas, 1815. He saw him half a dozen times a day, and did not know him to carry on any other business. Ile came to work at six in the morning, and remained till seven or eight in the evening. Mr. Bowden, a stove-manufacturer, proved, that Bentley came to work as a smith, in November, 1815, and worked for his father till October, 1817. Mr. Osb orne, a bookbinder, recollected Mr. Bentley . working as a smith for Mr . Bowden, in 1816. Ile afterwards made out cata logues to sell by auction, and dealt in hardware: The letter opened by Mr. Scamorrz was then read by Mr. As mom who, at the desire of the Learned Counsel, marked the pecu liarities of the spelling, much to the amusement of the audience. This was the case for the plaintiffs. Mr. BROUGHAM submitted, that the plaintiffs were bound to prove the allegation in their declaration, that the defendant had not obtained a certificate from the Company. He took the distinction to be this—that wheie an exception was created by a distinct clause, the burden of shewing that he was within it, lay on the defendant; bat when it was introduced to qualify the' penal enactment in its very body, the negative must be both stated and proved. Mr. SCA MATT admitted that the negative must be stated, but denied that it must be proved; and in• stanced, as exactly in point, the case of convictions against unqualified persons for sporting, in which every possible qualification must be negatived, and in which the proof of qualification was nevertheless wholly cast on the defendant. The LORD CHIEN JUSTICE held that the plaintiffs could not be required to prove a negative ; but gave leave to the Counsel for the defendant to move, if they I should think he was in error. Mr. BROUGilitat then addressed the Jury. He re minded them that they were not to try whether the de fendant was a man of good education—not even whe ther he was qualified to practise as an apothecary? but whether, in point of fact, he did so practise on or be fore the Ist of August, 1815? Some merriment had been created by the exhibition of his errors in spelling and style ; but a man might be an excellent compounder I medicines,.though an indifferent composer of sen- 1 tences—as Lord Chatham himself wrote letters, spell..l ing does " dos ;" and the great Duke of Marlborough, who was as experienced and as expert in the alt of killing as any of the Apothecaries' Company, spelled in a way which he might defy any of the Apothecaries' Company to rival—(Great laughter). Now he would prove that the defendant did practise as an apothecary tOr years, before August, 1815, (and the language of the record was (6 on or before"), and that, therefore, he was on this record entitled to a verdict. The Jury would not regret such a result, when they considered that this Act, though well intended, was most severe— that it created and perpetuated a monopoly—and that the old common law of the country was sufficient to protect the public, not only without the Apothecaries' Company, but against them, by the right of action which it gave to every man who had suffered from im proper treatment, by a person pretending to skill. William HaTtlon said, in 1811, he lived at Derby, where he married and had three children. 64 1, " said the witness, 66 was ill—Mr. Bentley gave me physic, which I swear before ALMIGHTY GOD did me good."— .He attended my first born, and gave him medicines (A laugh). He worked at Messrs. Strutt's, but he was continually dabbling in medicines ; he kept a little drawer under his desk, and mixed up little things.— , (Laughter.) John' Bentley, the defendant's brother, said he lived with him from 1811 6111814, at Derby. He was with him as assistant in the surgery. The defendant had :a surgery in his house, witll everything necessary to the trade. There wete jars, bottles, a pestle and mortar, weights and scales, and other requisites. He frequently carried out medicines to patients, and patients came to the shop. The defendant was educated under a surgeon at Whitchurch, in Shropshire, and afterwards with Dr. Fowler, at Derby. When he lived oppositeWerburgh'b 111..-- • • . • . - 0f.t.4i3 Church, there was a sign over the door, "-Surgeon' Bentley." On Koss-examination, the witness said he was 41• years of age. He was an operator on the feet by pro fession, and had been so for nine years. The defendant was about 40 years of age. The witness was educated • at Derby, under a persOn named Wood, a kind If den. tist—(A laugh)—and also an operator on the feet. lie Sias nearly a year with Mr. Wood, but practice Irad made him perfect. Before that he uas a frame-work knitter at Derby. 'His brother'was apprenticed to Mr. Bickerton, at Wbitchurch. He could not say how i•ld the defendant was then, or when he was with Dr. Fow ler: he could give no particular dates. The defendant left Strutt's in 1810 or 1811. He went to Dr. Fowlea's before he went to Strutt's. William Hadley said be supplied the defendant with drugs at Derby, and thought there was a drscription of him over the dour. Ile used to act as an apothecary for about three years. Cross-examined.—Mr. Bentley sent for drugs, and sent the mo ney ; sometimes 4d. or 2J. sometimes as much as .4i. John Dolman said he knew Mr. Bentley at Derby, and that he used to make up medicines. There was a sign on his door. Mr—Sca &LETT shortly replied. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE left the Jurc to say whe ther, on this evidence, it was made out to their satisfac- don that the defendant was practi•ing as an apothecary in August, 1815; not merely whether he had occa sionally mixed Medicine and administered pills, but whether he acted as an apothecai y, keeping a shop, and making up the preset iptions of physicians ? The Jury almost immediately returned a verdict for the plaintiffs on the last count ) for a single penalty of 01. COURT OF CHANCERY=-THIS D. 11: MR. ABERNETHY V. THE LANCET. On no occasion, not even excepting the car, of Mr. Fletcher and Miss Dick, do we remember to have seen the Court of Chancery more crowded than on the pre. sent occasion. Some time before his Lordship entered the Court every seat was occupied, and Counsel had the same difficulty of obtaining ingress and egress to their respective seats, as on the cccasiou of the heating of the Injunction against the Rev. Gentleman above alluded to. On this occasion, the Lord Chancellor was so o p. pressed by the heat, that his Lordship directed the windows to he opened for the admission of air. The SOLICITOR-.GENERAL having noticed the pre viosrs application, and the order for the motion to stand over for the purpose of allowing time for the defendants to put in an affidavit, now moved the Court for an in junction to restrain the Editors, Printer, and Publishers, from publishing in a certain work called the " Lancetr the Lectures of Mr. Abernethy, the plaintiff. The Learned Solicitor fist called his Lord'ship's atten- tion to the grounds on which the • motion was ordered to stand over, and then commented on the affidavit filed, which he described to be a mere compilation of blank paper. "It was," lie said, " an affidavit full of vacuity, and replete with no thing." If be could give a name to anything that would convey the meaning of " more than nothing," he should be prone to use it on the present occasion, for never could such an expression be better used than now. The LORD CHANCELLOR.-Mr. Solicitor, I should really like to see such a thing! The SOLICITOR•GENERAL proceeded. He would put it •on the ground of protection to literary property, and on this strong principle he wovld rest his motion. Here was a Gentleman, admitted to possess great ability, and was it to be said, that even in the very teeth of his own express denial to any publication, any set of Gentlemen were to be at liberty to publish his lectures, and these verbatim, even to the very letter? As well might it be said, that the sermons delivered by our most revered and reverend Divines,were public property, and might, the next morning after their delivery,-be published by any person who had the ability to take them down.— As well might it be said, that the lectures at the Uni versities, were equally the property of any Gentleman who might attend and think fit to publish them for his own emolument. Without troubling his Lordship far ther, he would rest on this principle of right of property; and as the affidavit put in, contained nothing that could in the least alter the law or equity of the case, he should sit down, confident that his Lordship would restrain the defendants (to whom he would not for a moment ascribe anything appertaining to ungentlemanly conduct) from continuing the publication of the work complained of. Mr. Rose followed on the same side, and in the course of his argument, compared the defendants to a " fowler," who, not content with taking the young birds, captured the old one also. Mr. Hones, for the defendants, argued at very consi derable length against the Injunction. His Learned Friends had dwelt much on the affidavit that had been put inthey had described it as a mere nothing ; and yet they had felt it to possess so much more than nothingness, so much more real and convincing proofs why this Injunction should not be granted, that the principal part of their arguments was devoted to it alone. He certainly must deny that it was an affidavit made up merely to secure another week's publication of the work. His clients were Gentlemen of too high honour to lend themselves to such a trans action. His Learned Friends had relied on their argu ment as to the right of property ;—and he, with as full confidence, also relied on his argument. What! was it to be said that in a case like the present, a case which was admitted on all sides to be one of the greatest public importance ;—a case in which so much ability, so much knowledge of surgery, was displayed by the Learned Gentleman who appeared as plaintiff in the case ;—was it to be decided on a mere principle set up? How was the argument on the other side maintained ? Why, they contended, in effect, that the public was to be deprived of those beneficial consequences arising from the promulgation of the Learned Gentleman's science. Had he in his bill stated that he gave his Lectures from written papers ?—No. Had he in his affidavit stated it was front written papers, on which he claimed a copy- , ight, that he gave his Lec tures? No.—His Learned Friends, aware of the im portance of this point, had confined-themselves to stating that the Lectures were .given as written pa pers. Had' the learned plaintiff even a:tempted to swear that he had even reduced his Lectures to manuscript for the purpose of publishing them ? No—and was it to be said that the public at large were to be kept from such high and important knowledge without any reason? The lectures were given publicly, and he contended that there .was n- thing deroga tory in the publication. Had Mr. Abernethy yen lured to swear that he had the manuscript by him and meant to publish it, the case a ould have been dif ferent ; but under all the circumstances of the case, he submitted that no lust reason had been assigned for his Lordship's interference. • - Mr. SHADWELL f Mowed on the same side, and in the course of his argument observed, that as well migl t • -.WO oNiiimmtiM!em.l 2r, • -•7l=ratzt=tatill ~~il~ll a person, who, walking along the street, should happen to whistle a tune, apply to the Court for an injunction to restrain a person passing .at the time, and catch ing the tune, publish it. Another sttong argument urged by the Learned Gentleman was, that the lectures in question were, by the rules of the hospital, attended by the pdpils . . it was not, however, confined to them alone; every person who might think proper, from motives of curiosity, •.raw ish to be instructed in the art, star at libetty to attend them, The Lout) CitANcELLon—Then I am to understand, that any pet son paying for admission is at liberty to attend. • Wr. StrAnwELt—Most certainly, my Lord. The Learned Gentleman concluded by stating, that as the lectures sere given extempore, Mr. Abernethy had no right to call on the Court to restrain their pub lic ation. Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL replied, and contended that where a lecturer read from a written paper his ob servations to his pupils, who paid for ;don ision, he had a legal and equitable right in them with any persna ho might write a work, and, without publishing it in print, read it in detached parts, to his hearers, who paid for their adnrission for the hearing of the whole course Hof Lectures. In this case a positive prohibition had beers given to the publication of the Lectures, and it was futile to contend, that a Gentleman had not the same work of labour to wade through in giving whit might be termed extempote lectures, as a person who wrote them dowA ; and for his part he aould not conceive how the differeilc._ contended for by his Learned Friends, could he mentioned. He denied that it was necessary to reduce to writing literary or intellectual labours, and on ttiese grounds he submitted, that the injunction our? ht to issue. The Louts CM NCRLTAM postponed judgment until Monday,Tor the purpose of Mr. Abernethy producing an origbud copy of his Lectures. SPURTING INTELLIGENCE. HUNTING. Ilis Majesty's Stag•bounds meet on b!-- iay, at Golden Ball, near Bracknell; Friday, at Stoke-green. The fast Sussex fox-kounds meet on `londay, at the Rocks, near Uckfield. The Sussex Brookside harriers on Mont at Newmarket Hill; Wednesday, at Lewes Race Course. Mr. Meynell's hounds on Monday, at W.chnur Park; Wednes day, at Egginton ; Friday, at Hollybush. The Cottesmore hounds on Monday, at Leesthorpe ; Tuesday, at Stocken Hall; Thursday, at Uffington Wood; and Friday, at Brook Hall. _ ' Earl Fitzwilliam's bounds on Monday. at Ashton Wold ; Tues day, at Standground ; Thursday, at Catworth Guide-post; and Friday, at Castor Ilanglands. Lord Yarberough's hounds on Monday, at Wakham Village; Tuesday, at Kettleby Thorp ; Thursday, at Ormsby Mill ; Friday, at Saxby Village. licirroe HUNT.-Sir Richard Sutton's hounds on Monday, at Harpswell ; Tuesday, at Legsby Village ; Thursday, at Ncctns House; Friday, at Wellingore. The South Wold Subscription bounds on Tuesday, at Holme Wood; Thursday, at Hundleby ; Friday, at Tathwell. At the meeting of Mr. Poad's fox-hounds, in Cann Wood, on Friday se'nnight, and just at the point of the fox breaking cover, Mr. George Rundle, of Stoke, in attempting to gallop his horse across the river Plym, was plunged under water, and carried some distance by the rapidity of the stream, which was much swollen. No other bad consequences, however, followed from this aczident than a wet jacket and loss of hat and whip, as both horse and rider are now quite well. Tuesday, the Berkeley Stag Hounds met at Harlington, near Cranford, attended by a numerous field of sportsmen, when a fine deer was turned out, which went away in the direction of Hawley Wall and Hayes, crossing the — Uibridge.road, near Hillingdon, to Fekenham, Northolt, and Ruislip, and front thence to Watford, in Hertfordshire, where he was safely taken, after one hour and 20 minutes severe running, in which time seventeen miles of country, in a direct line, were crossed. From the severity of the chase, but few were lucky enough to be in at the taking of the deer. SHOOTING. Mytton and Mr. Walter Giffard, on Friday week, killed 276 head of game, &c. at lialston, viz.-197 pheasants, 67 hares, 5 rabbits, 6 woodcocks, and 1 duck. OATLANDS STAKES. INTEWMARICiT CRAVEN MEETING 1825.—The Oatlands Stain s or 50 soy. each, h. ft. D.l.—those who declare forfeit on or before Dec. 31, to pay but 10 sovs. each, which forfeits are to go to the owner of the second horse, unless they amount to 150 soya. in which case they are to form a separate class, to be run for on the Thursday. age it. lb. Mr. Thornhill's F.milius - - - 4 9 0 Mr. J.arnbton's Carnival - - - 4 811 Mr. Cooper names Streatham - - 5 8 9 Mr. Grevillc's Premium - - - 4 8 8 Mr. T. Sadler's Triumph - - 4 8 6 Mr. Lambton's Buzzard - - - 3 7 15 Mr. Fulwar Craven's Longwaist - - 3 7 12 Duke of Portland's Joseph - - 4 7 12 Mr. Greville's Hajjl Baba . - 3 7 9 Mr. Forth's Swallow, by Skim - - 3 7 8 Gen. Grosvenor's Lyrae's& - • 3 7 6 Mr. Petits Verbina - - - 3 7 5 Sir J. Ilyng's Hannah - - - 3 7 4 Mr. D. Page's Silkworm - - - 3 7 0 SALE OF MR. DAY'S RACING STUD. Tuesday last the valuable Racing Stud of Mr. C. Day were brought to the hammer by Messrs. Tattersall, at the King's Head Inn, at Northleach ; but, contrary to expectation, very few of them were sold. The following are particulars : Baoon Martas.—Zuleika, by Gohanna, dam by Young Wood. pecker, in foal to Ruben,; produce engaged at Winchester and Warwick 1828; bought in at 800 gs. Snowdrop, by Highland Fling, out of Daisy, by Buzzard, in foal, and produce engaged as above ; bought in at 195 p. Matilda, by Ambrosio, dam by Don Quixote, out of Letitia by Highflyer, in foal, &c. as above; bought in at 96 Its. Calendula, by Camerton, out of Snowdrop, in foal to Spectre; bought in at 195 gs. Rosa, sister to Teniers, by Rubens, nut of Snowdrop; in foal to Spectre ; bought in at 145 p. Irr TRA INING.--ViCtOlille, b.m. by Haphazard, out of Phantas magoria, by Precipitate ; bought in at 150 gs. Melampus, ch. g. 4 yrs by Soothsayer, out of Zuleika ;...bought in at 195 gs. Plover, b.m. 4 yrs by Bustard, out of Matilda; bought in at 145 p. Sloe, bl. nt. 4 yrs by Waterloo, out of Rose, bought in at 195 p. Montecello, ch. c. 3 yrs by Soothsayer, out of Snowdrop, a colt of great size and power, sold for 350 p. Maria, b.m. 4 yrs by Grimaldi, out of Matilda, sold for 45 gs. A Bay mare 4 yrs by Bustard, out of Calendula, bouzht In at 54 guineas. Two-YEAR-Min.—Young Zuleika, b. f. by Fyldener out of Zuleika, engaged in mid a favourite for the Oaks ; bought in at 450 guineas. Kntellus, ch. c. by Anticipation, out of Matilda, won the two yr old StAes at Ascot ; bought in at 300 guineas. Burgundy. cb. c._by Usquebaugh, out of Calendula; bought in at 540 guineas. Islitoi West, b.f. by Rubens, out of Snowdrop ; bought'in at 440 p. Y amos. —Spectre, jun. (b.c.) by Spectre, out of Zuleika (en gaged in the Derby, in 50 gs. at Winchester and Stockbridge, and in the Guy Stakes at Warwick), bought in at 490 gs. A hay colt by Anticipation, out of Calendula; bought in at 245 guineas. Foat.s.—A bly colt by Whalebone, nut of Snowdrop. (engaged in the Guy Stakes at Warwick, and 50 gs. Stakes at Winchester,. 1827) ; sold for 150 gs. ' A bay filly by Spectre, out of Zuleika (engaged as last) ; sold ' for 110 guineas. A brown filly by Gainsborough, out of Matilda ; bought in at 79 p BA nver AARON, on NWiluesday evening, declared, at the Castle Muorgate, that uhless Tatters were soon beitled, the public should be acquainted, why the late disgraceful retreat took r b ce the dLy he was to fights Curtis at Warwick.—For h , zuself, he said, he was quite ready to proceed to action ; he knew of 11a cross being intend ed, and was ouly told these was to be no fight and hurried away in A chaise. I .1 'I,