Star. — London, England, 1828-12-18 00:00:00

BRIGHTON. Dit. 16. leers AUGUSTA, attended by MiSSWIIII7A.D. riage airing today, but did not visit the. tenets, Lady CAMP, and the Misses PaaCuria, Capt. r, of the Coldstream Guards, and Colorist' and Mrs. kit their names , at the Palace yesterday and this of Dreousataa entertained a dinner party at the rday ; among the company were—the Earl of Shaftes rid Lady Holland, the Hight Hon. G. Tierney, Mr. taro Webster, &c. and Duchess of BIDTOILD and family, and Lord and ND and family, purpose leaving us and returning to row. HE 1.. — A71E .10EPH HUNTON. by auction of tl - 271Ttrniture, fixtures, farming utensils, on the villa and grounds at %N -and Layton, the property of the late unfor- Rion, concluded on Tuesday. The sale on i s might be expected from the it.terest which Fate had excited, was numerously attended, rious lots sold well. The articles of furni. very numerous, but not more costly or vale is usually to be found in the country resi city tradesmen, nor were there any articles as heir looms purchased by any members of amily ; the whole was sold enreservedly to the rider. The Jews, as asual upon similar oeca. ered strongly, in-the expectation of *purchasing tat bargains. The total proceeds of the sale, stood, amounted to. very little short of 2,0004 irable manner in which the grounds ate laid I universal approbetioo, sad the ease of she ietor was praised by was admitted person who attended the saleithattthere is not quantity of land (15 acres) within five miles of nose tastefully disposed than ! pleasure - f the villa at Walthamktow. 04 the hank ,rtg declared, the messengef to'the Commisi ok possession of the property at Wilthamstow, eys were delivered up by tlre ,elddl ' t daughter unfortunate Hunton, a fine girl, lige t 7 years, iblormed that any particular' articles which bt wish to keep possession of; they were at retain. Oa this being communicated to iton, she refused to accept of the most trifling ying she wished the creditors to have every d actually delivered up several articles of 'plan], which the assignees did not require , and the things were sent back; but Mrs. el used to take them, and said, if there was any , after the creditors were paid in full, she pt of it, but not before. EAST INDIA HOUSE. Isy a Qom -telly General Court of Proprietors' at the East India House, Leadenhall•street. irpo.e of declaring a dividend Irons Midmos t) Chri►tmas neat. ridend declared by the Chairman, Mr. Astell, Ind a quarter per cent. SUTTRIL TNDRIt wisbed to know whether any comma had been lately received from the authorities relative to the burning of widows? He thougbt liould be lost in putting an end to these mut• few words from Mr. S. Duos and Mr. Hints. mean begged to remind the Hon. Proprietors was no motion before the Court. _ _ . MAIRMAN said that.dispuches had been lately on this subjectire Governmeot of Bengal. ski boonly one o p i on the inhumanity of the and all must desire,* see it put an end tn.! It ever, attended with 411ficulties ; and one diffi. se from the diffeience of opinion among the re. votionaries. Some thought that it might be put beet any danger, while others were of Opinion an attempt might lead to serioqs consequences, the slumber who suffered was so inconsiderable u not worth while to interfere. Another dif ow from the disposition of the natives. In Acts the prejudice is favour of the canons was rong as to afford any ground for apprehension aid be interfered with, while in other districts 'ay was the case. The difference of opinion he public functionaries might perhaps be ac for by this circumstance. It was a sburce of isolation to find that the practice was -on the The number of suffeie , s in 1826 was less than neding year. In 1824 the number was 572: 639; and in 1826. 560. 'OTIODER said he should take a future oppor. leaning their attention again to the subject. lune said, that in . Bengal alone not less than idows had been hweed• in the course of ten The Government at home should adopt some memoe for putting 80 end to so inhuman a It should not be left. to the resident Autho- India. a few words from Mr. Dixon, the conversation I. HUMS said he had latep tectived information to a practice which prevailed in the Post Nike I. and appeared to him mosAtibjectionable. The was to require the name of the senders cf all if the person who had occasion to send a letter :the Post Office did nut give in his hanAes.his could not be permitted to go. This lobfed as thing like espionage was contemplated; sit boast 4 naturally give rise to such a suspicion.' Such ice was unnecessary fortbe protection 'GT the re. because in India all letters were 01)441 In be slid. Rom Drascroa said that nothing like espfonage Intempiated, or ever took place.? Thepeisctree t intended so serve any ppblic purpose of she iment, but merely to afford sedulity to the linden rs. CHAIIIMIAS said the regulation was one of long g; the Hon. Proprietor need be under nouppre-1 ithit it would be abused. With respect to Sete would again take that opportunity of nbaiivrings I 'bust desire to see them put an cod to. When • !r, there existed on the part of the resident lies in India, such difference of opinion on the , it was not to be rendered at if the Government e, not possessing equal means of information, It difficult to come to any final decision. Since L efficiAl Returns there was a diminution of 120 numbei of Suttees. osirer to a question from Mr. Hums, CHAIRMAN said. special care was taken to ap• ko person to the Staff who was not properly qua and who (torn his knowledge I f the language capable of addressing the native soldiers. Court adj urned at one o'clock. are 'my glad to learn that the order for corn. the operation of stamping newspapers an Seile I.t the o f f ice h er e. ha s at last come down. The Res are to be sent from London; sod it is pro bY the Ist day of January, they gull_bo ,to as to begin.—Calcdomitne Merano, PROTESTANT MEETING AT ASIIDOURNE ••••• , 410.•-- Monday, pursuant to a'requisition of the inhabitants of the town of Ashbourne and its vicinity, a Meeting was convened by the Magistrates, for the purpose of petitioning the Legislature against ithy further conces sions to the Roman Catholics. The National School Rooms, in which the Meeting was held, commenced filling with individuals about two o'clock, when the Chair was taken by Sir HENRY FITINERBIRT. The Petition to both Houses of Parliament having been mad, The CHAIRMAN said, that all these Gentlemen whose sentiments accorded with the Petitioners were to signify the same by holding np their hands. A show of hands then took place, which was in favour ortbe petition, as it was unanimous, like the Bridge north election, all on one bide. _ _ The CHAIRMAN then requested that all thrise who were averse to the Petition would hold up their hands. A solitary hand was exhibited, which caused a great uproar, and shouts of 4 4 Who is he?—who is her (A farmer from the csvwd- 4, Ah I who is he belike? Mayhap he wants to say summut.") The (gentleman who held up the dissentient hand declared that it was held up "in a mistake." ,He had intended it to have expressed his satisfaction of the proceedings. Several Gentlemen of the county addressed the Meet ing, after which the following Resolutions were passed: On the 11101i0V of WILLIAM WEASTER, Esq. seconded by . JOHN HARRISON, Esq. it was Resolved—That the Petitions read at the opening of the Meet ing, addressed to both Houser, conveying the sense of the bleefing, be adopted on this occasitm., • On the motion of. Dr . GRRAYES, seconded by Capt. Go-stmt. it was • • - Reyofved—That the Right Hon. Lord Howe be reword in present die Petition to the Lards, and • that Francis Mundy; Esq. Member for the County, be requested to present the Petition t• the House of Commons. On the motion of .1t..13. MANCLAItLe, Esq. seconded by the Rev. SAMUEL SHIPLRT, it was Resolved—That the Petitions be left at Mr. Redfern 's to Ash bourne, for signature. • ' Thanks were then voted to the Chairman for his gen tlemanly conduct in the Chair, • and the Meeting sepa rated, after, which the church bells were set ringing, and bands of music paraded the town till a late•hour. • The Mecum created the greatest sensation in the town that has been known for some time. A stranger unacquainted with the circumstances would have sup posed that the news of some great victory had been re ceived, so unusual was the rejoicing. FRY AND CHAPMANS BANKRUPTCY. The third meeting for the proof of debts under this Comm:ssion• was held yesterday, "at the Bankrupts' Court, Basingball-street. It was niore numerously at tended than either of the precetiing meetings, though still the amount of debts proved was by no means so large as alight have been expected. Amongst others who attended to prove were Directors of .the Per elvian, the Brazilian, and the Real del Monte Mining Com panies, and the Imperial Fire and Life Insurance Com pany. The question respecting the proof of debt on the part of the Brazilian Company, was before the Commis sioners at the last. meeting, and a doubt existed as to whether one of she Directors could be allowed to prove. i The Commissioners appeaved.to haie contldered the subject and made up'there mind; on it in the interim, for thiapplication of Mr. Fr eshfield, that ,one of the Directors should be allowed to prove on the pan of Me others. as the money bad been- paid in their name, was acceded so without observation. The claims made to prove on the part of she Reel del Monte and Peruvian Companies were similar , in principle, and were admitted, it being asked in each case whether she Directors or Trustges we;e tI4 only parties known as the depos't pry and the only parties whose checks would have been answeie4 The Imperial Fire and Life Insurance Company was differently situated. By the Banker s t book it appeared that the money was deposited. and the account opened, in the amen, the Company. Here the difficulty rise —whether, as this was coca Company acting under a chaster, or an Att of Parliament, it should not prove as a pattnership concern? and if so, whether one of the partners, proving in the name of the others, it would not be necessary to set forth the names of all the co partners or shareholders in the .depositions? • The Commissioners said that the case was new, hut they thought that it would be •-esttemely inconvenient to call upon the company to set forth the names of the shareholders, in a company where there were 3,000 shares; and alter some short discussion, in which the absurdity of such a mode of opening a banking account was dwelt upon. Mr. Commissioner SUITH said, that in this case they must depart from the oaf) nal y mode of proof in cases of copartnership, end allow one partner to prose „tur the others, without netting forth their' names. In answer to some questions put to the Solicitor or, the Company, it was stated that the names of the pewit shareholderi would be f and in the transfer.books. The Coosa' then ordered that those books should'be produeed at the nest meeting, and being duly verified,' the deposition shoold be allowed to stand in the name of the person proving. and of the ether partners, .tat Get forth in the trartsler-books produced. * A creditor appeared to prove for 62.51. as a trustee under a deed of arrangement. connected with the petty of the Coburg Theatre. The Commissioners said. thattheetiaititt of the co-waste* must be obtained before proof could be allowed.. The debt was ordered to stand over to the neat meeting. Y r. . We noticed in our account of the last Meeting. the case of the holders of 'cheeki drawn opon the bank fg depositors, and not pocked before tbehank It seemed to be the opinion of the Commissioners at the former meeting, that the parties holding the checks. could not prove under the commission; but they reserved their decision to yesterday. Several holders of checks under similar circumstances appeared yesterday, and were ii•tormed that they could not be admitted to prove for their amount ; but the parties who had drawn them might, if the, pleased, add them to the amount of the balances for which they bad already proved, or might yet prove. Mr. Pitmen observed, that in this case they would be rendering themselves liable for the amount' of the cheeks to the partial to *torn they hail paid them. The Commissioners said, that the holders and drawers of the checks might make any arrangement amongst themselves they pleased. but the estate could not be af lasted by it. The drawers of the checks only could prove 4aiir the Consasissiou. Soars parties then praverifor balances, including the ____ oldie checks they had drawn, bur it appeared that in sevagat cases thee* was an understanding that Anse to othoest.the checks were paid should receive only the 4iliklepsl on their maim, whatever it might be. The Doting then adjourned to Friday, when assig nees wilt be Adam • • LITERATIME. • - THE FOREIGN REVIEW, Na. IV. . &Arm, lobo, and &Ace. The present number folly sustains the early pron-i,e of talent with which this Jou n d was first intrOucert into the literary world. The contributors are evidently men of information and talent, who write more from the abundance of their acquisitions, than, as is the cus tom with some celebrated Reviewer., from ransackiog their common-place books; and the Editor's duty in assorting and proportioning his materials is on the whole extremely judiciously discharged.. Evidently a work of this nature presumes a class of readers of a higher order than our domestic Reviews—at leist as tr. its critical articles. Bus. still, under the head of foieign information, there is a deal of mater in which even au ordinary reader cannot but be interested. Such is the sketch of Jesuitism in the present number. The fol. lowing extract gives an account of the present state or the order in France: " On Napoleon's accession, the owes societies of the Jesuits gradually revived. In 1808, the congregation of ' The Invocation of the Virgin,' a name ominously taken from 'the times of the' league, was formed with regular officers, heads, and a president of the whole. The system is now declared to be spreading throb:A France to the molt .entraordinary anti most hazardous Client. • It is said that en universal espionage fur its purposes Is established, and that all classes are enlisted in it, from the cosh dential servants of tile Throne down to the labourers of the geld.. The workmen are embodied and disciplined under the name of the ' Association of St. Jurists;' every district of. Paris has a chief, and the whole have a commander, Who is secretly a Jesuit The common wine-sellers are incorporated, and even valets and chambermaids are of the congregation. In the higher ranks this strange influence is equally notorious; the officers about the coon and the Garde Royak have pot escaped; and a curious cirettm. stance is stared, that a Marshal of Fiance, who had long and vainly. solicited a place of sub prefect for his son, ac last obuincd it : Apuly 'through the application a his parish Print to one Of the beads of the congregation. Of Its members in the,Leslslature no exact account is yet obtained. In the Claantbero Deputes, the mem hers were some time since variously estimated from one hundred and five to one hundred and fifty, but they were unquestionably in- creasing." The autlinr proceeds afterwards to state very lot cibly how the predominance of Jesuitism' i r France, which banished - all idea of true religion; and the great ad vance of 'literature, which exposed the vile superstitions that had assumed' her name, led inevitably to that dar ing iufi ielity which borrowed with a vengeance the weapons of .the priesthood. There can be no rational doubt that the cause of the Jesuits is hopeless in France; they may plot and plot, but they can no longer steal a march on ,the unwary, and there is nothing to appre hend that a nrtion alive to its interests will again sub mit to the yoke. The author is a little sore on the score of the Jesuits being allowed to settle here—the' reality of the evil is not clear, but this is clear, and the remedy is at all times in our own hands. Another article possesses n general interest for every . scholar who has ever been guided by the learning and exquisite taste- of the first of modern comnsenristors— we alludp to atsketch of the life of Heyne. Born in the very lowest station, he had to struggie through every species of obstacle that povetty could throw id his way. He lived during a very turbulent period, when the affairs of Governments otten left his study . a heap Of ruins: he pined under the chill influence of patrons ; and at last his 'genius obtained 'for him the higheit 'place in the University of Gottingen at Hann: l yet, at the unsolicited recommendation Of a stranger, Ruhnken, who possessed a kindred genifis, ancknhat is' more, a heart above the suggestion, t f jealousy. Inde pendent of tile interest which any details of such a man would possess, the novel circumstances ni his likrender this sketch a very interesting piece of biography, worthy to be placed beside Gifford s account of himself.. The following extract gives a'strikiiig picture how armies array annoy such peateable and- harmless ani mals as Critics: - .• " The Prussians advanced meanwhile. and on the 15th of July (1710) the bombardment of Dresden began. Several night i I passed, in company with others, in a wrens, anti the days to my room; so that I could hear the balls from the battery, as they flew thrmigh the street, whining past my windows. An indif rence to danger and to life took such possession of me, that, on the last morning of the siege, I went early to bed. and, amid the frightfullest crashing of bombs and grenades, fell fast asleep of fatigue, and lay sound till esid.day. On awakening, I huddled on my clothes. and ran down stairs, but found the whole house deserted. I had re turned to my room, considering what I was to du, whether, at all events, I was to take my chest, when, with a tremendous trash, a bomb came down in the court of the house ; did not, indeed, set lire to it, but, on all sides, shattered every thing to pieces. The thought, that where one bomb fell, more would soon follow, gave me wings ; .1 darted down stairs, found the house door locked, tan to and fro ; a last got entrance into one of the under rooms, and sprung through the window into the street. " Empty as the street where I lived had been, I found the prin. cipal thoroughfares crowded with fugitives... Amidst the whistling of balls, I ran along the Schlossgasse towards the Elbe Bridge, and au forward to the Neustadt, out of which the Prussians bad now been forced to retreat. Glad that I had leave to rest any where passed one part of the night on the Boor of an empty house; le other, witnessing the frightful -light, of hying bombs, and a burning city. At break of day; a little postent was opened by the Austrian guard, to let the fugitives get out of the walls. The Captain in his insolence called the people Lutheran dogs,and with this nick-name gave each of Us' a stroke as we passed through thrgate." . - - - CHRISTMAS AND New Yeast's Gters.—.The season ,kaving arrived wherein, by interchatige of presents, we confirm the stability of friendship, all clamant she community who would luccesduUyicultitate regard by acceptable oirsringsi -avail themselves of ROWLAND It genuine }CALLUM& and Maeassaitht.. each of Infallible attributes. In the sustainment and creating limuriatit and silken tresses, the Macassar Oil is highly applielated rank and fashion, and patronised by all' the Sovereigninf utope. Rowland's Kalycbir is a preparation of Utmarldielet en. e,acy,in purifying the skin t 'ln:steel's" fit from ,ivelensent wean*, and eharacteriting 'the complexion 11th transcendent brilliancy.— No present can prove more reemumendatory, or more now io genus' requisition. • • IUsTEn, Dec. 13.—A melancholy case of pau- Ferism came under the notice .of the Mayor and Siitiog Magistrates a day or two ago. An . elderly man, . with• long gray hair, and the scanty remains of a coat that hid once been black, with a careworn•countenanee and. a palsied hand, approached the Bench, and Making a very respectful obeisance,' intimated that he was firced by hare necessity to come to swear his settlement.• He stated that his name was Beckett, and was 63 years of age. He entered the navy at the age of sisteea. in the capacity of midshipman, served in America throughout all the last war, and was reduced at the peace of 1814, after having served 38 years without promotion. Being only a petty officer, he was not 'entitled to any half pay, so that he was absolutely worseoff than a man before the mast. The poor fellow answered with great modesty . the questions • put to him from the Bench re specting the eugagemeas he had been in, by which it appeared that although left to pine in inelgencv.and neglect, "he had done the State some service; A brother who was also in the navy perished in • Alexan dria. He proved his settlement to be in Ne*ton, a township adjoining this city, where he was born, .end his father formerly occupied considerable propertyeaa He, together with a wile and two children, were coos*, mined to the care of the overseer. Besides the hard-' ship of this poor man's case,• it is further worthy of rea mask, that he ii great nephew of Alexander Pope. LAW INTELLIGENCL _ .~►_ .... COURT OP 11111011.8ERCH, Worristweraa, Dac. 11. Tilt ICINU v. GEOROC RlDDituvor. This was an indictment against an ettorneybf Cle• menu's foe, for silt& and corrupt perjerys Mr. Gummy (with whom was Mr.Gotn.anett) stated the case (or the prosecution. The piosecotor. John Alexander M'Laren, baying, in October, 1826, been arrested at the suit of Reuhen:Martin, the 'pugilist, for a sum of 501. which hadJbeen . depesited in M.Laren's hands as one of tine stakes on a wanking match. applied kis' the defendant to pin in bail above, and defend the action for him. The prosecutor had had no previ us 'a,quaintance with the defendant, ,and was taverna mended to by a person of the name rf Han bury. who was a client of his. The defendant un dertook to put in bail to the action, but required an advance from the prosecutor of W.. 51. which sum was paid to him ; but the mnaceutor having of entrants Awe reawfl to be dissatisfied w ch:the defendant's con-. Ilea, declined to allow. him any longer to conduct his business, and went to another attorney..• Mr. Hanbury a as also dissatisfied with the defendant's conduct, and be therefore resolved to take his business out of his bands. For that purpose a Judge's order was obtained fir the delivery of the defendant's bill of costs on Mr. H misery, and undoe.that onto the defendant made out his bill; bat to the great surprise of Mr. Hanhury and also if the prialecutor, the costs incurred in the action at the suit of Reuben Makin, wbich the prosecutor had employed • Iteddaway to defend. were charged in this bill to Mr. .Hanbuty. ' The total amount of the bill was between .1411 Andl3Bl.•' 'On vexation. it was reduced to about M. the Master:begin disallowed the costs in Martin's action against the prosecutor, and some other costs which he' did not conceive Mr. flanbury was liable to pay.— An application was then made to the Cr nit of Common peitspq the pan r f the prosecutor, fur the purpose of comrllio# thedefendant to make out hiebill on hint. tuft nisi was granted, and in the affidavit made by itedefendant and his clerk, Walter Tyler, ;he perjury in this case was assigned. In that affi lay.t the defendant swore that at the first interview wt,ich he had with t e pis se mar and Mr. Hanbury, he stated chat he would nit undertake the defence of the action at 'the suit of Martin unless Haubury was to be considered his client s and would undertake to be answerable for the costs incurred. He swine further, that Hanbuty expressly desired him to defend the action at his (llanbury'e) own expense and risk, stating that the money for which the action was brought belonged to him„ and that the prosecutor was .ff cted by the action merely as a nominal party. He also positively swioe that lian-! bury said to him, st I employ you; I am your • pay master, and will pay your costs.' Upon this the statement in which was confirmed by ire Tjlet, Who joined in Vie Ada• t the rule ,A jai was discharged. Th prose-aver, cleaning the statement t f the defendant tote A Ise, hid thought it his duty to pre. le, the prevent indictment. The only anparer . t mr cis e for the defendant's false swearing seemed to ee this— The defendant having in the fist instance, r-u - in bail for the ptosecutor in the wrong Court, hid occa lotted an expense to the prosecutor if upwards of 121. and had promised to deduct it from his bill if costs; end up d iubt I is of jest in making out his bill upon Han busy, instead r f the Frosecumr, was to avoid making .an allowance of those expenses. The Jury. howevet, would be the best judges of the defendant's motives. when they had heard from the witnesses all the facts which he (tle Leaned Counsel) should lay before them. A- clerk, from the SecOnclai its' office. produced. she several affidavits made in the cause r f « Marcia tr. M•Laren,” in the 'Court of Common Pleas, and they wereput in and read. • e prosecutor, John Alexander M'Laren, was - called, and depose 1 as folio.. se ide at No. 1. Lawrence-street. Mgt.-strict, St. Giles, slid am. a housekeeper. I was formerly in the publii In October, 1826, an action was brought against by Reuben Martin, and in that action I. was held to bail. I applied, on the secommendati:n of Me. Hanbury, to-Mr. Reddaway,-the defendant, to lend the action as my atorney • Hanbury • accom panied me to the chambe.s. of the defendant on. my nut application to him ; I to ld him that I had bees ar rested as a stakeholder for 501. and explained betides patticulars bt the Case'; * he un 'en() .k to defend OA action. for n.e, and told.a.e it would not be netesaary to cute any steps immediately; that is 'would be some weeks before Lail could be put in, Ind chit I.e would *cite to inform me Wien it would benecessaiy - tot him to see me again. Mt. fratibury told the 'defendant that I, was a re,p..ctable per s on, end. competent to p .y, o r otherwise-be wont I not' have introduced. use AO him ; Ake. defen t dant's clerk, Tiler, was . riot preitte; the de -feculent waft by himself; it war on a Sunday ; 1 did nor see-Tyler -till some weeki efterwatds the witness then proceeded to' negatire 'the allegations made by. the defendant in his affidavit. The defendant did not decline to defend the action .unless Hanhury was to be considered his client, and answerable for his costs. Hanbury did not le,ite him to defend the ate lion at his tisk and expense, nor did Hanbury say that the.money for 'which the action was. brought belonged or appertained to him; and that I was-affected only nosainally by the action . Hanbury did not say ,to the , defendant—ok I 'employ you; I mu year pay. anasterodadavilt"pay your'costs nor did he use any language to that effect. The defendant snag/antenna to ilifornteee that it would' be necessary to- pupia I cheats/int taribis . office. I think his clerk.. Tyler, was then preemie.- That was the first time I had seen Tyke. The defeadant-then informed me, that as I Alas a stranger to him he should requite me at first to pay bit Goats as thishilaineis went on. He then told me'thht if would.bireeceekary to have an advance of 11.'54. fur the perenseeirttiai in bail, and I advanced hilts that sem • We thenseeent to. Sergeant's Inn and put iiithail a 'sad the defendant :afterwards requested me to In n . sh him:with the namegeof two persons to justify. I went to him the nextirnorning and gave him the two names, and 'then Weihis request 1 gave hint another pound.-- Bail was put in inn= the wrong Conn ;' In consequence of which proceedings .were taken, and I had to pay twelve pounds costs on 'staying the pros. ceedings. A person of the name of Furzmau was one of my bail to the Sheriff. On .the preceedings being taken against me and Fineman ou the bail bond, we went together to thedelendant's chambers. We did DOI see the defendant then ; but I petit again done, and ' then informed him that we had been all seed With ants in consequence of 'bail having been put in in the wrong Court. He expressed his surprise, arid said he would see into the business. ' He made an ap pointment to meet the same evening at the house of Mr. Furzman, who is a publican, in Smart's buildings. Holborn. I dent there and saw the defendant. whom I reproached fot hit negligence, and putting us, as I thought, to unnecessary expense. He request d ire n t to scold him, and said he would deduct the expenses omit of his bill of costs, so that It should be nothing out of my pocket. •-Cross-ezatnined by Sir J. SCARLETT—I ceased to be ce 11 ti 1 •.! i it i ) ..r ; $ •