Star. — London, England, 1802-09-04 00:00:00

rORK ASSIZES; AUGUST iBoz. 1:11.7KE Or NORFOLK V. HILI.I4ESQ:. This was an ejearnent brought by the Duke of Norfolk, as trultee to the elates of the late Lord Petre, for about 200 acres of ground inclofed by the defendant as common belonging to his manor of Birkin, which the plaintiff contended did in fad belong to Lord Petre's manor of Hilham. Mr. PARK, the leading Counfel for the plaintiff, flated,that although there appeared to be two ver diets in favour of the defendant, yet, as the late Lord Petre had been no party in thofe fuits, the prefent plaintiff did not conceive that his rights could be barred by any verdict given in them ; he therefore brought the prefent ejectment to try di• r_ 'fly the right of property and of foil in the land in queltion, to try whether it belonged to Birkin manor or to Hilham manor ? Although he had a great mafs of evidence to bring forward to prove that this part of the common which had been in clnfcd by the &Su:dant had always been reputed to form part of Lord Petre's manor of Hilham, yet as he was aware that the defendant would alfo produce evidence on the other fide, he Ihould par malady dire& the attention of the Jury to what his Lordfhip had the other day held decifive in a fanilar carafe, namely, to the :Os of ownerfhip ex erciCed by the alham people over the common in qnettion. The firlt aa of ownerfhip he fhould !late . was this, that the people of Hilham had very he ; queotly and for a great number of years been ac cuftomed to drive off the common, and impound all the cattle they found upon it, except thofe be longing to their township ; to thofe owners who ( without claiming a rightof foil or of commonage) requelled their cattle to be reftored, they gave them back ; but every perfon who claimed the re delivery of his cattle, as a matter of right, was obliged to pay poundage : the other ads of own. erfhip exercifed by the people of Hilham over the whole common for a great number of years, far beyond the memory of the (+idea man living, were repairing the roads, digging and carrying away the foil, cutting whenns (nr furze), for their own life, and not permitting the people of Birkin, or of any neighbouring township, to do the like. He Mould prove a great number of initances of thole general acts of ownerthip which were as along as *mild be (hewn over a common, where there were no mines or quarries to afford opportunities (,f more fubllantial and beneficial ads of ownerfhip. He fhould prove alfo fome particular affumptions of ownerfhip that were rather biking. About 36 years ago the people of Birkin put up a guide poll -on the ground now in difpute, and the fate of this guide poll (hewed very wrongly the opinion which then prevailed of the property of the foil of the land in queftion. A cobler of Birkin, who fome times ilepped beyond his 4 4 7, andfii.-bed up a few lines of miferable poetry, immediately preditcd the fate of this unfortunate guide poll, and on the day of its erection wrote upon it the following " If the landlord doe) not you bail, " Yon% lie and rat in Hilbam Although he could fay nothing of the poetical ta rents of the cobkr, yet, if he was content with the fame of a prophet, he MIR declare no oracle ha.i ever uttered a greater truth. The people of Hil. barn did not Puffer it to remain there three days, flit cut it down and carried it in triumph to the Mound at Hilham ; there this unfortunate guide poll lay for many a year an ()Ned of companion. a monument of fallen pretenfions, till at length thme of the Hilham per;ple deemed it worthy of Arving the porpole of ~Sre wood, and this alone pre- Vented the Cobler's Prophecy from being fulfilled to the very letter. Another remarkable aet of owner- Ship was, that at a later period a man was found dead on the Common near where this guide poll bad been, and was buried at the expence of the parill of Hilham, who certainly‘conceived them iblves bound to pay that expence. The ftrongeft evidence, however, which he had to produce, had been dircovered by accident fince the laft trials an illiterate ploughman, in turning upthe ground, ,felt his plough alike againfl a large (lone, which, upon being dug up, was found to have the infcrip tion H. M. 1641, and, upon examination at a very fbort difiance, was found a fimilar (lone, having upon it G. M. 164.1. Thefe (tones could be nothing elle but the boundary (tones between the Manors of Hilham and Gaytford, which, tonfequently excluded all pretenfions of the people Of Birkin to claim this ground, as part. of Birkin Manor. The WI evidence which was produced in flip port of the plaintiff's title was,the depotitions taken in the year r 768 of a number of old witneffes, in confequence of a bill filed in Chancery by the La dy of the Manor of Hilham, for the exprefs pur pole of perpetuating their tellimony ; they had known for a confiderable time, fome for above 6o years, the common known by the name of Hilham Common, or Mafpin Moor (which included the /and now in qiie(lion). It was always reputed to belong to Hallam Manor. The people of Hilham had been in the cullers of exercifing every aCt of ownerfhip on this common ever fince their recol leCtion, and in particular they had always held an annual feaß upon it, on fome day in the month of July, upon which kali day they always drove the entire common, and impounded at Hallam pound all the cattle which they found upon it, that did not belong to their townthip. Whenever the owners of cattle of the neighbouiing townfhips pretended to any right of con . imonage, their cattle were not releafed without paying poundage. . A coafiderable number ofold witneffes proved the different efts of ownerfhip Rated by the learn ed Counfel in his opening fpesch. On their crofs examination, they denied that they had ever heard, till within there few years, the land in difpute called Birkin Piece, or that it was claimed as part of the Manor of Birkin. They admitted, however, that there were bridges to it from the enclofures of the townfhip of Birkin, but explained this .-ireetnflince by raying thefe bridges were permitted in order to give the people of Bir &ilia carriage. isaigarrafaihe Idear.to shawl 021111 C they had heard of a clofe called Dirkin Little Moor. The boundary (tones were alfo produced in Court, which a mafon declared, from his judg ment, both as to the appearance of the atones themfelves, and from the charaCters of the letters and figures upon them, mull have been of confide rable antiquity. Serjeant Coc Kee, on the part of the defendant, made a very animated addrefs to the Jury ; he faid, that agairat the weight of thole two ponde rous (tones which had been produced in evidence, and relied upon by the plaintiff as decifive ; he had, to oppofe, what he trulted would have equal weight in their minds, two verdids already given in favour of his client by Special Juries of that county, after a long and weary trial and invefli gation, which extended to eighteen hours upon each occafion ; he afked, what would be the value of landed property, or at what time could it be faid to be secure, if after folemn verdias, and con fiderable firms of money expended on the faith of thole verdias, it was dill competent to the plain tiff to purfue his claim, and involve thole &dates in endlefs litigation ? He fhould then (late to the Jury the grounds upon which his client had already obtained two verdias, and on which he confidently expe&ed a third. The Common, called Mafpin Moor (which the plaintiff's witneffes to belong altogether to Hilham Manor, and to ire known alfo by the name of Hallam Common), is the.remaining part of a much more extenfive Moor, which was a Common to the feveral Manors of Hilham, Birkin, Gayt ford, and Hambledon: the witneffes all allow, that the people of Gaytford and Hambledon, enclofed pieces of the Common which next adjoined them, and were known by the names of Gaytf)rd Piece and Hambledon Piece. After they had made thofe enclofures, neither Gaytford nor Hambledon pre tended to any right over the remainder ; but his client infided that the remainder of Mafpin Moor did not belong excluneely to Hilham Manor, as pretended by the plaintiff, but that it belonged to the two Manors of Hilham and kin, and that the part adjoining Bit kin (which had been en cloled by the defendant, and was the matter now in dirpiiie) had always been km yen by the name of Birkin Piece, as the tett of it was by that of Hil ham Piece. In fur port of this claim, he (hould not only bring a tirc.at number (if witnelies, but the (irongeli arguments that pri.bahrtity or analo gy could furnish. It had been confelfed, that Birkin had ()I the c.!in,: interett in the Moor as the other adj:,ining itlatur .-; but the people of Gaytford have melt led a pat: of it, known by the name of Gaytf lid Piece ; the people of Hamble don had alit) encloted a piece, which had been known by the name ot llambleden Piece : what then had become of Bit kin PL ce, unlefs it was the land in quettion? . The plaintiff's witneffes, al though they i.nitted that they never heard till lately the land in qualm) called Birkin Piece, con fefrd that they knew the dole called Birkin Little Moor; did not that name evidently refer to a larger moor ? The Learned Serjeant then dated, with much force, the differents ails of ownerfhip he thouid be able to prove, dwelt at length on that Itrovg at of mire, fhip, admitted by the plaintiff, that Midges had been built and fuffered to conti nue for a more really cf‘lign.•AnicatiOn between the enclufures of Birkin and th- C rermon, which they , claimed by the name otiliirkie Piece, and had now incloted : but what he ctquide•ed the ftrongell and molt decifive pool* of the title of the defen dant, was that a high bank had been railed by the people of Bit kin above one hundred years on this moor, which (lid otitis, and which the people 4:11 Hilham never pretended to &Goy: this bank, he thould intlit upon as the boundary, as dividing Mafpin Moor into two portions; one of which (the piece inclofed by the defendant) was always known by the name of Birkin Fiecf : hank, acknowledged to have been railA by the Birkin , people, he confidered as a flat:din m,nunseqt, re cording through ages the title of the del.-nd The Learned Seijeant having dated Ile! cafe of his client, fubmitted to the opinion of hie le.ed thip, that the following records and verdi (ts,t which he fhould produce, were concluf:Ye evidence, and flopped the plaintiff: The firft record was dated 1319, and written it. the °ldea charaaers of Norman French ; by this it appeared, that there had been then an aflize be tween the Lords of the Manor of Birkin and Hil. ham, about that Common : this ditpute, however, having been terminated by a non-fuit, and a 11th. fequent agreefnent, and not by verdict, and a judgment upon that verdid, his Lordthip was of opinion, that that record could not be given in evidence. Another record, of nearly the fame date, in the reign of Edward 11. was alio produced ; but it appeared upon infpeaion that this was not I an affize between the Lords of the Manor of Bir kin and of Hilham, but an attempt on the part of the Abbot of Itielby, then Lord of Hilham, itt conjunction with the Lords of Birkin and of Ham bledon, to exclude the Manor of Gaytford front its (bare in this moor or common. His Lordthip was of opinion, that this record was inadmiflible as evidence, as the parties and the ()Ned of that fuit were totally different from the pretent. Serjeant Coca EL then offered, as conchrfive evi dence, the two verdias lately obtained at York affizes by tht defendant; but his Lordlhief was of opinion, that the firliverdid being in replevin, merely on the queflio n of right of commonage, could not be given in evidence in this caufe, which had a very different objea, namely, the property of the foil ; but that the fecond verdict, being on the fame ilfue, that they were now trying, might be given in evidence, if it appeared that the late Lord Petre was connected with that caufe, and de fended it as his own: to this point the Yorklhire agent of the late Lord Petre was examined, who pofitively denied that he ever attended thole trials, on the part of Lord Petre; that he had ever given any iralruCtions to any perfon on the part of Lord Petre; or that Lord Petre ever (to the belt of his belief), contributed to the expence or fupport of either of thofe trials 3 he admitted that he had been at York .during thole trials, but laid lie at . , to evidence, as Lord Petre's ri g htc:ennlil nn't fie learned by tranfaCtions of other perf o ns, to which he was not a party directly or indirectly. The Learned Setjeant then brought forward a great body of evidence, both from the depotitions in Chancery in the year 1768, and from living witneffes, to prove that this piece of ground now in difpute had always been known by the name of Birkin Piece, and reputed to belong to the manor of Birkin ; they alfo confirmed his ftatement re fpdling the bridges from the Birkin inclolures to this part of the common, as alio refpeaing the mound or bank which they always confidcred as the boundary between Birkin and Hilham. On their Crofs-examination, however, they admitted, that the Hilham people very frequently and regu larly, on the day of - their feaft, drove thz whole common, and impounded all the cattle they found upon it, not belonging to their townfhip, but that the Birkin people never did fo ; they alfo admitted other ads of ownerlhip, as ftated in the plaintiff's cafe. Mr. PAR K made a very able and animated reply. Lord ELLENBOROUG/1 confidered that thole' ads of ownerlhip, conftantly exercifed by the Hilham people, without any fimilar acts of owner lhip attempted on the part of Birkin, turned the fcale fo completely in favour of the plaintiff, that there appeased to him to he hardly any balance of evidence between the parties. The circumaance of bridges being fuffered to exift from Birkin in clofures to the common had been explained. The Birkin people bought lime at Hilham, and wanted a carriage road to draw it home. As for that bank or mound, which the defendant's counfel fo much relied on, there was not a fhadow of proof for what purpofc it had been erected, and the de •fendant had a right to jiippofe it to be for that fur pole which belt ferved his intereft.—But the hones which had been found with antient infcrip tions, having on them H. M. G. M. 1641, could not be conceived to be placed there for any other object, than as boundary (tones. The defendant's witneffes had certainly proved a cuftom of com monage on this ground ; but that was very dif feient from proving a right to the foil ; it {bine times happened, that one man has a right of foil, another that of commonage ; it oftener happens, that from vicinity and good neighbourhood, a cultom of commonage is permitted, even when there is no right of commonage ; but right of common is one thing, and the right of the foil it f,:lf a very different thing. As for thofe ads of ownerlhip which mark the claimed and acknow ledged right of the foil, they were fo entirely on the part of the plaintiff's Manor of Hilham, that the evidence as refpeding the if appeared to be all of one fide. However, if the jury had any doubts upon the fubjea he fbould read to them that great and voluminous mars of evidence that they had - heard in this caufe. The Jury, after a very fhort converfation, told his Lordaiip that they were f.ttisfied, and gave their Verdict -for the llaintifF. SPILSBURY'S ANTISCORBUTIC DROPS.—This well known excellent Medicine, having been ap proved by the public near 3o years, hardly needs any further recommendation : but as a Gentle man of refpeaability, refiding in the neighbour hood of Spilfby, in the county of Linc.,ln, and whofe cafe was novel, had the goodnefs to call on the Proprietnrs, at the Difpenfat y, No. tc, Soho -Iquare, to -acquaint them of the cure he had .re cently experienced from the ufe of their Medicine. Meifrs. SPILSBURY and Co. beg leave to acquaint the public, that by applying to Mr. .HoFF, of Spilfby,they will receive every fatistadory accouut relatve to the cafe and cure alluded to, which for many realhns would be unpleafant to the Gentle man to have publicly advertifed.—Aug. 9, 1802.- ECCLESIASTICAL PREFERMENTS. Monday Lat. the Rev. S. Clapham, M. A. Vicar of Great Our , boric, Yorkthire, was inftituted by the Lord Bifhop of Wirchrftxr to the Vicarage of Chtilt. Church, Hampfhir, . he RAN. Dr. Alkew, of Norfh Cadbury, and the Rev. Dr. Baty, ~f Nlarkibury, are cleeced Reprefentaaves in Convoca tion isi . Bath and Well,;. laft, it Ray Cottage near Maidenhead, the Lady cf John 'airy Newholt, Eli). of a fon. MARRIED. Thurrday, at St. George's, Hanover-lip:lre, Ekon , Joddrell, of Byfickl, Norfolk. Efq. M. P. to Mils Weyland, slddt daugh ter of John %Veyland, Efq. of Woodeaton, Osfordfhire. Lately, Samuil Hood Linzec, Efq. Captain in the Navy, to Mils Woo!ridge of Plynymth. On Thurfday laft, at Kinglton, Thomas Price, Efq. to Mifs Smith. Lately, at St. Leonard's,.Shorzditch, Captain Hawes, of the Royal Navy, to Mils Debell, of Andover, Hants. - 01 Wedtufday laft, at Margate, Mrs. Mary North, of Lom bard-ltreet, jeurell. r. Tuefday bit, at Charlton, Mrs. Atkins, wife Q;Jo!In Atkins, Efq. of Walbrook. On the 25th ult. Mr. John Borrett, of Abingdon•ftrect, Weiltninfter. At Stirling, on the 2t ft 10t. Mrs. Margaret Stewart, thugii ter of James Stewart, of Tar, Lfq. On the 2 cth ult. at Farehant, Stephen Barney, Efq. ..tca.• years Tow4'Clerk of Portfniouth. • On the 24th ult. Mr. Wiiliam Veal, of Southampton. lie was in perfect health on the preceding friday. Same day, Mu Sytnes, wife of Captain Symes, of the royal Navy. Same day, after a short illnefs, Mrs. Holden, wife of Mr. Hol , len, of Halifax, bookfeller. At Rawcliffe, near Stiaith, in his 7cth year, Mr. John Of wald, who was for many years a dißinguifhed officer in his Ma jetty's Navy. In the 66th year of hl 3 age, the Rev. John Bell, reaor of St. Crux, Pavement, and St. Margate, Walmgate, and curate of the perpetual curacy of St. Sampfon, all in York, and toatler of the grammar-fchool, endowed by the late William Naughton, Efq. alfo in that city. At Biggar, on the roth ult. the Rea. Robert Paterfon, fter of the Relief Congregation there. At St. Andrews, on the loth ult. iu the 85th year of hi. age, Alexander Scott, Efq. At Dunlin, the Rev. Jofkua Nunn, Rector of El, nifc9rthy. At Lifbun, on the 224 July, where he had been on the Staff of the Army in Portugal as aid-de-camp to General Frafer, Captain !-imon Ftafer of the (meaty-fecund regiment, fon of James Frafer, W. S. At Inverefk, on the 23d ult. Mifs Marion Dalrymple, fermi daughter of the deeeafed David Dalrymple, Efq. of Weßhall, one of .the Senators of the College of Juftice. At Parity, Linlithgow/hire, on the 26th ult. Gerge Dallas of Parkly. Efq. TO-M , IRROW STAFFORDOtiMP.SITON'AI.t, I-TALT.I73TX-- I'o 131.. SCI.I) LY .".TICTION—ny 11.. At the Swan, in Stafford, in tin C -tiny ttt:rati ~' • d4y, the 19th of Ozloot iYoz, .Lt tj, .Afternooti, (fuhkel t.'• itch C t. - th !.. • ChlCall; unl fv dilpofct l lA' in f'.l •itt. .7) tratft, in which cafe Tun Dart Nr.!it.t.c. v.:it 1 1 , r:v. A VERY de!mil)le '.E • 11,11.1., t ..•:.• • iltuatcd on tin tniincnc.., atij( • • 0.. • ( dolt to Cl:tiler, t s (rt:IU ht " , •• latter Place, Two !roue j e ,'„ • from Stafford,and 1 wr•o.e from :t.;• ' • :; cold:ding of-an cX.c", 11 r , , Stonc IVlattfion, co.• ! tachrd °Ric. s forty :•i, rc.l . a. 1. • Gar.ltn, Hot and 1; rut r. I !0ut . ,.:. : : extenfive and varied tc•trst t:routo'l, , •., ht:rics ard Walks, laid t•ltt j. containing ut ward.% tti • Acr tint), of the firft. anti m• 7 .: r~ i %•:*: ! :r.. .., .., , ir .. r, t ~ ~ I, _, r •: t r .'r~ ~ Th, Premifoconiimcd v al,cl aajo:lity a Etrge btat , ...1 . 151 c,t co Acres, m view :rem vx. - iott 1.17. The '.l , ..ivhhonrhand ;:s CoLntry a!,ounds with Gatni, and ,t!lur ;:.1 Spnrts. l'oltcflion may he had inunLdi.n..ly, or :1; t r .,. and One Half of the Purchafe Nioney rn.ty of the Ettate. i ••r e ; The Fanner at the Ittll will flicw the Prtrnif t . s . ar ,d 5 of the Eaate, and Ground aod v .tio u o f : I L , 1 . i.hr.4,4 1 may be feLny.t Mr Crutwc ll's„ Belt. P. inted Particulars may alfo h. kid of Nit% Cruf-adl :of the Printers of the Liverpool, N'ar.chclr, ham, Chetter, Derby, and Stafford Pp( rs; and Williams, Lincoln's Inn, Lot.doi, wh(rt :A Map oftle Eft.ite may alio be ken; and of Arian. :wel K..- t!, Stafford, who are authorifed to treat for i!iz. Coin rad, and from whom any further Inu r.i .v W'HEN Pt( feilional Men of education anci fponfibility deviate from the geveral leNon of a peculiar Branch, the of iot,g c-iititued fuccefs is the belt criterion of fiii-triority. Eight yrar I have I devoted my praatic.c. to t!.!. it•'•retreat. meet of THREE DISORDE - qti, a:ld tl:e my plan gives me adational ardeur to op oly as : . a7 !am able the ravages of tilde comp!ai;it ani,ort. ant in the catalogue er human After initiation into every branch as an Arm: "Tx7eloe fornied a with at an earls , period of Pra,.:i.ice to _ i als from the ignorance of une,lticatcd 4a, protts precipitancy of ren , •::.! Praait!oners The. Tiff( )1S012.1)1•RS, to t:lc cure !r:t7.! voted Mv atr , ntion, comprize every !"pLcies cf V., • iNFECTION, vi!iet::e; of a re! . ..e - :t or loni, •: All kinds of DF.131)31 . :T, w:.er'er ari!ii:g trf.rt t • ;claoolLoys or the oi :r I, •Nr. rangement of t`n: fyibetn in Women tvLich is ea:lel 13,11Lii5,N. NES:: or STAItILITY. Num..rons di:in'es ale the %fiat sifignnranec "u!: ?n treatment of a ilmple (.'onorrilca,an.! it ncr t:••••• •11:. i!:•? pens that t'-e feeds ir(i; Crc• .!; un c ,-uar(!ed hour. By a rfiper;or inetoti ‘ 7e cafily cured, and even vvh...re others hay c: \I ; t 'J .. ..a may preumc to ch . , r a radical i'ew, howevcr, ar. the caki • ! dirir&r,co:npa•ed i. f . &cm i 7 a P,Y : re.:1;•!-• t',:s aF LI th-t itlte is the cqn't.vitetic.! '•,• •• . Whc .c ully CO!ICCA . 7. :11; :ni.f:.nunc. him to kIIJIV, Cor:: :':C11 . 1:;'1 it I .`C ?7*. :..re i -:..r tabity wit!: ().7•0.r the rt . .n:•)•• d. 'l. ti. •r cu CIENci ES • neat of ray es.perir '';.. Segun to reduce niar.: nr.171 .~ .R by an early co,:nteraCticti of tb."!.s ealrs no grey diillcultics will (weer. But where this Dt.fie!cncy ha: rfyrc.er:::::.' ; • .rare. forerance is pluttite to re.. C....! • 1.: 'pris of Life, and to r;.:-at imat:. the. Cc.7l)L MARRiED WOMI:N. who L.A.: !!•!: in :heir expectations of a Family, may Lr , :!:trod, tit !*1 7 11Vit inttances iitch (!efetis are curzlile by N7L,'.ic.al The SECRECY which is fo effentii to the Q_ualifications wltieb I Nivt. re:unte.i • Bans of my Praczfions, and i!coLlei.l.:r.ce mation is given, that Mr 13-- r.3zy (or by letters int./cling a grail lt his holy:A No.-.9,Anr... &I-art:et, Strand. near Ternpl::-Liar Tbere is an aJditiottai enrrance in ItVz!er-d.rtet a toiairi and the name is on both the M. R. Mernhe , .•• the i. LC ef SI•r;•,-rre To the ./‘ FFLICIED with GOUT atid RilLi;'.i..lll. M. rIiOUGI I the gre.tt :iir • fiLy, that",.cent wa, . that is, in plain EnOilh--" t; !tea; d Dr. NVard woul , l (nay admit of Ter:lriorary R. ii. 1"'^). abbe in a confirmed R:ituiliate'm coolit militaries of the Medical Worl-1 rife 1: ont ; he . • is perfuaded, from Lever failini'; i•••:.p ..• • - nr.•nt at th-:ir Rtforrection, he i•.) . -1••••: . tin at the nir::treloli; ,r).•.: ich Dofcs of his NERN'f)li'.; tOt: . ; tv:ne'l, `;• itinate (':+f s, have tvrought ILCII ii• Gouty and alitommitic will :lave ;i) him, as its l•iveritor, 1.1 r,•.; ,is •••'.l. and Fei: ri Pc. ,re„l. ;vir.i . olv t, ti • o•''. : • W. l'A R 1)() • hi. Alajetly's ;;;;•-•`.•• Sir—lt is will knee of your Botaniial .-•ycop, wh:ch h •" from the mutt (sertici .;i::g i• • of the loints, tviti,•ll I irive •• : 't months. be affurAl i :h.:11 v v ••••••:•• cin' to the litmoit of my power .—i 7 7 I oftedient humble fcrvant, 1....uz. • Plymouth Dock, July 31, .• Nt'itners to the abut,e Cor,•—.l„ t.r .. 7. 7 1 - • • tioner. No. S 2, Fore-II re t, Plymonin I) JOAN ( - 10GW(fr)1).1.1•t: f•rviro. •.. V. • •::-• "'• 6 Role km, Sivingliourn, v. i. I.ii• a ••I • rably afflicted with a ri.• - r.r.i.itic v.h• proached to paralytic,!„ ; •r, ; • entire the -.• ;. • ing or foliating his l‘iii.n-fs; i:: this t01". i .ver...! of t;:e. mot!. ot •••••• •• encini7 tae of ; •: -•-• ir; 1, or ins tr:-.•1 • tire.'... r. ' at hi:. .),•iin 1••;, • • 1",..:u, n 0.." t.i 1, •, r, is t:::lose hi. blif.:• , •••..s • •• • the leatt lynt.,.•tottli CAI": ahoy: coin' Ct,.s . - - • nisti to N•ir. Xieu.S.ixton, •• •. ;' '1: •,, e • Witm Ills to 01. i! al:ow Cure•— . !.",•. - V. '••••'', . •F• Cie Rae Inr., SittioBlrruril; Mr. John r -• • The l'iot;t••ical ••yrup and Relleir,ri...eN • ' 'io.d at the Doi:Lir', I. of N%. 9, : • - t 1.2,.; I is.; 65.; (i.l!it)•itLludc:, "7.,() ,irsp,•9..• t ,. l: I • •• • ) 42, t i ?o!lyirt ; W;ttth.tut,.:, No. 2:(;, r••'' • Royal F.:;ellang•!; 1 4 i•ro.on sr • 1 i• -•. • • 1... ry, Co-ocr ~ 1 ••• 1i01t071% yid ; nip. Ana • N• r • 11,!:•; Amick. an i S •ii, v.;.:, 7 "` • a. Afledicioe ilr,•,•t. I) ••)., ..•" war . ; Balk; ~ No, 7,, t; the :nn; For!)••-, 1)1i1;. ;. ;ii . .., Lj rou:;h; and Dicey, ra...e i e;e. -An, to he L .l the rl l " l:; : i r .. l' t"P..;;I ,',[ 1.3. :!:I,r 7 t ~,:.j- '. ti.r ! ; I . . !II k 1 ;;*:t. ~~~::c,~. ..,, .t .1 ' ; - - • • LON1)ON: fr:r thy hy 111 N • (of Carnabv-ltre.3) at t1••• 4 rn m r•r: • N.:AM ' • Cary-ltreet ; an:l p4llli . oy tr.rburv-DiaCe,l.3Nbrt`t,'. y, N 0 1. .:'.-cy-flrcet. whic4 (!1,:c: all ,i)noa'w ~~ 1,. • :. -1 11