Star. — London, England, 1818-12-14 00:00:00

Adieu, Margarita, and let me beg of you to desist upbraid ne with inconstancy; for here I swear before the Ammorre that I love you still, moat devotedly so; but that I am w.th you for many reasons. If I can be of any service to dr, and you will Lad T am still your friend as well as Now a long adieu. May you be happy for ever! hap s the miserable being who writes tlwse few unconnected , and when in society with some of your friends, recol heart that beats but for you ; which beats againsr the the woman it bleeds for, with an agony nearly. madden- Oh, Heavens! Margarita, how I suffer; how I love: rse the sentiment that makes me feel it—it kills me.— Attu, adorable creature, and for ever. • Ezwass &Lion. Remember me to your faithful Adele_ Addressed—" Mrs. Hervey Aston, Aston4tall, near War- Lancashire." SCA aLsrr then addressed the Jul y on the part Defendant. lie rose, he said, with feelings of canon anxiety—not only on account of the young man whom he represented to day, but account of the plaintiff himself—because it was aisfful duty to lay before the Jury a case, which not hut reflect upon the character of a gentle horn he did not know, but of whose connec ,r hid some knowledge, and entertained to as them the highest respect. He must, however, discharge his duty in this place, and, as Counsel for Mt. Eardorr—the iv against whom a verdict was at their hands—he should endeavour to shew the case against him was bottomed in afoul con against •the wife of the plaintiff, in order to what had long been the object of the latter, , to obtain a separation from his wife. It was .y of remark that the witnesses who had beer. by his Learned Friend were not quite so did as he felt himself obliged to be in his opening. Learned Friend gold the Jury, that he did not to represent that the plaintiff and his w ife were atrao Binary instance of connubial felicity ; a confeision which, out of the mouth of the plaintiff's Couusei, was tantamount to a declaration that they -lived .like cat an dog togethel.. But the wit , with one accord, negatived his Learned iieriffs statement, and would have it believed that Afton and his wife had lived together in the perfect state of harmony. Aatother circum not a little extraordinary, was, that Mr. who had gone to France for the purpose of _Ling evidence in support of this case, and carry design into effect, had only been able to procure French witne ses to tell his story for him, it ad.;,itted that his establishment at-Passy con of 13. serv.ents. Where were the other servants?' he .find only a French nurse and a French place tie tail this extraordinary tale? Now. ,iass Mr. Aston ?—a man with a fortune of 4000.OrCI6n) , )0 a - year, living in a splendid style,. ' associating with the best company in Fat is.— then were those persons with whom he and' ;de were in thelabitsof associating in that gay teitell in what Lawler they lived together singleSuglishosao; or a single Englishwomen, called , 'to support this part of the case. The were to collect the whole of the gait attibuted • defendant from the.gyideuce of these two witnesses, for the 4orrohorati:,a of whose tes / the defenthioes letters bad been read ; but iry need not be told that they did niat sit in the the purpose swallowing down, and .receiv... gospel, all thatevery witness cattle forward to a however, they could le lieve what these had sworn, undoubtedly Mr. Elliott was without defence. But they sat for the purpose of ivestigaing the 'truth of the evidence given by the witnesses, judging,of it by its probability , and con-' tradicted by the evidence which he,should lay 'before by waich they must be satisfied that the case plaintiff was founded in conspiracy—that con y being sus ported by perjury. It seems that _ letters which had been read were put in for the purpose of confirming the testimony of these two Witnesses; but in his humble judgment those letters afforded no confirmation whatever. Judging from in experience of the passions of mankind, he say, that the letters of Mr. Elliott did not the language of a man who had enjoyed the ion Of unlawfullust, but rather that of a man hoped for the gratification of his desires; for the Jury came to look at the letters themselves, must plainly see that they afforded no evidence the defendant had been guilty of the act imput him. His letters were couched in language of most ardent and romantic love. Did any man write such letters after the enjoyment of his passion in the gross and indecent manner described by plaintiff s witnesses? Never. It was incon with human nature, and contlary to the expe of ail mankind, that any man should express language towards a woman who had gratified alt in all the wantonness of the grossest posti lf, then, these letters could not be considered affording ally Confirmation of the.other evidence, • tnust be put wholly out of the question. me a, therefore, which he had to lay before the Jury defence was this : Mr. Astou, the plaintiff, being of large fortune and respectable family, had \Tried his wife in Spain: she was very young and .nieeced ; and at the period described by the witnesses, namely, 1816, could not speak English.— -- would be proved that in 1815, Mr. Aston was tired wife —he being a young man without the , n th o f feeling of his friend Elliott—that in 1815 frequented the worst houses in London, leaving wife to spend her time in solitude in his absence some. That in the course of this time (long befute Elliott was introduced to his wife) he had de. ed to a most respectable and honourable person, he was determined to be sepal ated from his wife, hal. charged her with infidelity to his bed as as excuse for such proceeding, but which charge he aftewards retracted to the same respectable person ; when they went to Paris, all the respectable of the inhabitants of that c ay cried aloud against ikind trew.ment to which Mrs. Aston was sub ac the h.c.ltis of her husband, evidently with set exposing hdr to the dreadful alterna . v..et,star) separation. It was at this period the delendant became acquainted with her, and sathiting in her misfortunes, used every art to . 1 , IN 1 set - stile ones. your tricolor 4 ' to love and would he :it tied to you vibes in tov ten to whoa Whom 1 hi 'slily in futu " Adieu, , ing Inc with co,. th.it angry IN .th . . you, sp. it, ).. . 1 lover. bTol pier than th scrawls; all leet the lea 'copy of the log. Oh, I but cane th Adieu, -die I . " Remcn Addressei rington, Lai I , Mr. Sc If of the Def MO COM:it very your on accour his paiisfu cotilii not man who tions h! 1 wards the discharge Mr. Ei.x,f sought at that the c spiracy at gratify wl namely, t worthy of ' adduced. candid a s His Lear: ;., •. , mean to r an extrac confeisiou Counsel, had -live( nesset., v Friend's s Mr. Aitan f " most pert stance, n Aston, se t collecting I I , his desigi two Frei' being ad. I i sisted of l . 1 , Could ht valet de p ! 1 who was 1:15.000.4 i! and asso , here th hip wife city, teii Not a sin, wa calie Jury wen to the de French w tienday t the Jury box for tl log as go swear. 1 peeso,us I F without d investig.t: witnesses, tradicted them ; Is; oaf the phi :piracy h the letter , . rename vejtnesses afforded his own 4 • should s: speak the fruition i ,1 who hup when the they mu' that the I eli to hit the most . i ever wril passion hy the p sistent w tience of such lan; his lu st tutVni. I as afford they tnu case, the . , is delen, a man o ' rnarried ines pei it ' $ witnesse l It would of his $ warmth be frequ his wife at home • Ur. Elli t ', - elated 1 II that he and ha:: excuse ,ftewan. that, w • part of t the unki . jecte.l ,i an in:l' :', • tire of c i. ' 4l '' . that the , - • 1. sympatli .. ~ ... 1 t . . . •,. • ''.. 41s, • r • 4 seeable ones. It can, however, never mate me cease to cherish memory with the greatest fondness; nor, Margarita, cease • and .nciere ynu to the latest moments of my life. It `re In.nsensc to say that I dun try to forget you, for I am you (in my affections) for life. Yotr will receive this town, perhaps in company with some of those thane whom you at lout owe a good deal of your misery. ~nd I hate most cordially : but why should I say so ? they future be my companions, but never my friends. - • soothe her aalictions. under such circumstances he formed a fatal attachment, which, it would appear from the evidence, had been countenanced and the-' rished by the husband, for the purpose of "arecting his object. Undoubtedly (the Learned Counsel said) it was not for him to defend the conduct of Mr. El liott, but he was prepared to slew that he was not a voluntary seducer in the transaction, and that, in all events, the evidence of his guilt was such as the Jury could not believe. The Learned Counsel having concluded, called the following witnesses: George Westall, Esq. examined by Mr.Wmtrams. Witness .became acquainted with Mr. Aston about three years ago, at Paris. He had known Mrs. As ton some years before. "He visited them frequently, and always thought their manner of living together the reverse of domestic or happy. Mr Aston was generally absent ; indeed, he seldom dined at home. It was not till the year 1816, however, on his second visit to Paris, that he hearcdany particular complaints. About that time Mr. Aston had said to him that he had cause to suspect his wife's fidelity and upon one occasion he said he could have proved her infi delity curing the time he was in London attending his mother. He mentioned to witness the name of the gentleman whom he suspected his wife to have beeq improperly acquainted with. It was not Eiliott. A few weeks after, he said he believed heal perfectly innocent ; he was desirous that a reconci liation should take place, and wished. that Sir George Cockburn would interfere, and bring it about. Wit ness had no opportunity of observing how Mr. Aston spent his evenings. Mrs. Aston visited the Duke if Wellington, the Ambassadors, and indeed the first company in Paris. He had frequently dined. with them at Passy, particularly in October, 1816, and then Mr. Elliott was present also, together with Mr.', Aston. Mr. Elliott and iir. Aston appeared to be on the best terms, though witness understood at the time that Mr. Aston had given orders to his servarts to nrevent Mr. Elliott from entering the house. It was principally in the mornings that Mr. Elliott used, to call at Passy. Mr. Aston seemed on friendly l terms with him. Ile used to call him " Elliott " It was " Aston" and " Elliott" between them. Wit ness left Paris in the N-'vcmber following. At that time Mrs. Aston spoke English perfectly. • This witness was not cross-examined. Richard Ryan was a dealer in lace, had known Mrs. Aston for about three years. She called on him about or near three years back, in company with another lady ; and in consequence of some communi cation which she then made to bini respeciing her husband, (witness was hot allowed.to state the nature of this communication). .he, witness, agreedto watch 1 his,obserratioas for about his conduct. He continued a fortnight. During that time be .frequently SAW Mr..Asten in the day-time, walking in different parts of the town with mean-looking women ; he believed them :o be women of the town. Saw him with them in the Strand, in the Haymarket, and other places. On one occasion he saw him enter a house of bad character, in °tendon-street, in -company with a woman. Cross-examined by Mr. Goat:ay.—Witness resides at No. 5, Shepherd-street, Osford-street ; had lived there upwards of five years, and he was also in part nership with his nephew in the tailoring line. John Robert Hume, Esq. examined by Mr. SCAR- Lgrr..-,Niitnets was with the British Army of Occu patioa in France; he was attaled to the Medical Staff at.head.quarters; he was at Paris in 1815 and 1816, end was often in the society of Mr. and Mrs. Aston; he knew Mrs. Aston in the latter end of 1815, or the beginning of the following year He had met with Mrs. Aston frequently at the Duke of Welling ton's, and other houses of the highest rank ; and he likewise visited them at home. I.n August, 1816, he was desired by Lady Sydney Smith to visit Mrs. As ton its his professional capacity; he did so, and found her labouring under a most unpleasant indisposition, and suffering dreadfully from the effects of strong medicines, which appeared to have been given her to excess. She was then at Paris, and Mr. Aston was at Passy ; and witness visited him also, when he ad mitted having been the unfortunate cause of her ma lady; but at the same time he expressed the most poignant regret at the circumstance, and said that it would not have occurred, but his physicians had as sured him that all symptoms of indisposition on his part had entirely subsided. This was from the 7th to the 10th of August, and Mrs. Aston appeared to have been ill about two months. 'Often saw Mr. As. ton in public with Mrs. Aston, but sometimes she used to go alone. Dr. Hyde was attending them both. Cross-examined by Mr. GURNRY.—Mr. Aston ex pressed the utmost anxiety to be reconcitedmrshis wife; but she was extremely indignant at his conduct. Sir George Cockburn, examined by Mr. Sc Armen. —Was at Paris in 1816. Did not know much of Mr. Aston, but had known the lady ever since the siege, of Cadiz; she was the daughter of a Spanish mer.' chant, and a most interesting woman. On his arri val at Paris he renewed his acquaintance with Mrs. A. ton. He, of course, saw Mr. Aston, but was not on terms of intimate acquaintance with him. Had heard of some differences between Mr. and Mrs. Aston. They had become matters of conversation among the triends ef the parties. The day he wis leaving Paris, and after the horses had been put to his carriage, he received a note from Mr. Aston, request ing to have five.minutes' conversation with him. When he came he expressed great uneasiness at the unfortunate state of affairs between himself and Mrs. Aston, and requested that he would interfere and endeavour to bring about a reconciliation between them. He, (Sir G. Cockburn}, said, that it was a matter of great delicacy to interfere on such occa sions, but said that he would do what i‘e could. At the same time he asked, in as delicate a manner as possible, whether Mr. Aston was prepared to give up associating with a particular description of company which report stated him to have kept : and whether he was determined, to forsake them in future? Mr. Aston replied, that he was. perfectly pre c ared and determined to do so. He admitted that his con. duct had been bad, in the respect to which witness had alluded ; but there had been faults on both sides: thaf his wife, instead of attempting to reclaim him by kindness; had been very violent towards him. Inimediatel after this, witness ordered the horses from his carriage, anj postponed his departure for Ithat day hr order to effect the reconciliation. Ile then wrote a note to Mr:. As!on, to Fassy, =Woe- i • in g what h th passed , M4d requeWirz that she would call on him as soon as she conveniently could. She came in•abOut an hour after. Witness then repeated what Mr. Aston had said, and pointed out. the pro ?riety of their being reconciled. Mrs. Aston at first hesitated, and expressed some indignation at the man ner in which her husband had Leliaved to her, but she very soon consented to be re conciled. Mr. Aston, who was Itt hand, was then introduced. Witness joined their hands, and they were reconciled. It was quite-evident to witness. though Mrs. Aston had at first made some objection, that she was very fond of her husband and wished herself for the reconciliaticn. In the. conversation before Mrs. Aston came, Mr. Aston had hinted at some reports in circulation, but said he was convinced that his wif was perfectly in nocent. Witness believed that he left Paris that evening. He heard no more of those miseries until after his arrival in -England. Cross-examined by Mr. GURNST.—Did not recol lect that Mr. Aston had mentioned any thing of his suspicion of Mr. Elliott, or of any improper conduct of his wife towards him. It was possible that such a thing might have passed in the conversation, but Le could dot take upon himself to say that it had passed. Upon recollection he thought that no such observa tion was made.—Sere the defence closed, and . , Mr. GURNEY, in reply, stated, that the evidence ,produced by his Learned Friend had fallen far short of what he had promised in his speech ; for the only testimony that at all corresponded with his assurances was that of Mr. Ryan, who had been picked out of a tailor's shop. The evidence of all the other wit nesses, with the exception of the Doctor, merely con firmed the statement upon which the action was grounded. But could the facts of the Doctor's state ment he said to authorise or justify an invasion of the plaintiff's happiness, and in §uch a manner ? Could the errors of the plaintiff Ice considered as a ground for thus attacking him ? What a precedent would this afford if it were for a moment admitted ! With respect to the complaint that the plaintiff and his wife had not lived haFpily together, had there not been set up to meet that complaint the unfortunate temper of the Lady ? It must have been seen with j what sorrow the plaintiff contemplated the error into which he had fallen—into which he had been driven by the various, annoying, and injurious occurrences which he had met. How penitent he was, and how much reason he had given to suppose that the hap ' piness of his family would have been continued even to a greater extent than ever, had not this defendant • iven the fatal interruption. What did the other wit ness prove?—that he had she Nn the utmost anxiety' ' to be reconciled, and that his disposition to reconci- , Nation was destroyed by finding the defendant and his wife at the same hotel, and learning that these was undoubted evidence of her guilt. His Learned Ft lend (Mr. Scarlett) had called this a base conspiracy against Mr. Elliott. From his soul he (Mr. Gurney) believed, thertNnever yet-was a man who• imputed to that honourable man (Mr. Aston) the villainy of con spiracy against his wife, which must have been-the crime if he had conspired against the defeitdint.-- Mr. Gurney proceeded to answer all-the other parts of the charge against the plaintiff with much EihME• tion. His Learned Friend had, he said, cast a 'slur upon the evidence of the French servants, but ad mitted that he believed that of Lawrence, the butler. Why, what is to be inferred from the evidence of a man, who raid that the defendant " bolted" when the plaintiff rung at the bell, bat-that the defendant had been occupied in a guilty acquaintance? An objection had been made to the long-continued silence of the servants; but he begged to know whether in London, where the minds of servants were more pure than at Paris it was not often the ease that the greatest secrecy was observed amongst the 'domestics. Was the defendant, he asked, without. the means of de fence? Where was the faithful Adele ?. Why had, not she been sent for?—because she could confirm 4 all ; slay, more than had been said. • Why had Mr. Elliott called her faithful ?—becayse she was -privy to the criminal office in which he had been enraged.' As to the letters which his Learned Friend-had' said` were the letters of :an nnsatislied.passinn, he would ask, when was a• young gentleman of 19 to be satis fled, who had made a most atrocious attack upon the riihts of hospitality? But the defendant was called indiscreet. It was unfortunately too muck the case, that young men became old, and-that boys became young men ; but it was 'very StitibM that a young man of 19 was found.to carry such - evidence of can along with his indisaetion,..ns to loolvto a sera.ii .rate maintenance With kbPel- as to think of gilding his passion by participating in 'the separate-mainte nance. Mr. Gurney concinded'with deblaring; that• he viewed the conduct of the defensiatit' as- criminal in the deepest degree, mid as partaking of meanness as well as of guilt. The CHIEF dOsTrcz now.-proceeded to address the - Jury. - He obsefved,zthat -there.were• two queitions for their consideration fi rst, aitowffetliet the adul tery had been comtnittedl anil.reW if they Were tisfied that it had, What Was ihe - aniotint of claZaiages to which the plaintiff was;entitled? A great many observations had been niaffeby the Learned Counsel for the defendant, which :Certainry were not'at all borne out by facts. The Jury would, therefore, con ! fine their attention to the eviderice, and . upon that alone form their eetcluslon. His Lordship then re capitulated.. the testimony of the witnesses for the plaintiff ; and alluded to the letters written by the defendant, and stated to be confirmatory of his guilt. In conclusion, his Lordship yenlarked that this case • was nct one for heavy daniAges, and left the Jury to form their own judgment upon what would be a fair compensation to such a husband Tor such an in jury.—The Jury, •after a short consideration, found a verdict for the plaintiffinrages One HuAdred Pounds.—The Courtdid not rice till .past eigln. o'clock. ' ' Frith). se'nnight, a hen partridge flew against, the window of the office of Messrs. Twopenny, on College green, Rochester, and was so much exhausted that it was taken up by a person who was near the' spot at the time. A young man, of Maidstone, named Mullindar, was lately drowned near Rochester bridge, by falling from the bowsprit of a vessel ipto the river. Ftes.—About half past eight, on Saturday night, a fire broke out in one of the chistnies of the house of Alt. Coot, baba . — Sather, in Ifolborn, which, from the confi.ied situation of the place, and the house being built of wood, caused much alarm. It burnt rapidly for some time, but foruustely was eabdold without spreadin ranker, Charles R. Lee, to be imprisontdisr three cc - As; led George De= to be pubisely wicypesl. Some otl.er prisoneis, charged with petty oP , are still for trial, and the Sessions are mot to be finished till 'Wednesday nest. A vacancy has occurred in the Office of 1. in the Western Division of Kent, by the death Ceow, E,q. Solicitor, of Seven-oaks. _ _ Monday, Alderman Sir WILLIAM COAT/I took his Freedom of the City of Rochester, on whit} casion the worthy. Baronet gave the Mayor and poration an elegant dinner, at the Crown BM Tuesday, as a boat, in which were three lads, 'A ho bad been orT catching witii-gs, was co on shore at Dover, it upset, and one of theta name was Longthorn, was unfortunately &ow, the two others uere saved by clinging to the boa, of the boat. Saturday se might, a lad of 16 baying gear garden in the neighbourhood of Glasgow, to birds with a loaded pistol which he bad out ir4 jacket pocket, with the mouth of the Line" u) most the pistol unfortunately went off, aid lodge contelts under his arm pit. Ile was iastantl ried home, Sand medical aid procured, but on Fr, was wi s ed with a lock jaw, and died in the even* triiirn. Rev. IL J. Ceklart, 14 ctor ot Little R Sing , . tonshire, to Sarah, youngest daughter of Wm. WAker, Sutton Hill, Surrey. • At Calcutta,. the Rev. Robert Hutchings, Chaplain East-India Company at Penang, and Rector of Dittisison, to Elvira, daughter of the Lae Constantine Phipps, I Wotton Court, Devon. Rev. C. B. Cooke, to Mary Anne, eldest daughter i Hayes, Eaq. of Marlborough Buildinrs. Tuesday, at A.hford. George Elw‘t .I,..ramt, Esq. to ces, widow of tLe late Capt. Do/lhaz. DIED. Rem John Watson, Chapl2:o to the Earl of Liverpool, of Faulkbourn, ESSti and Chaplain of Iforeden CaLege, At Boothll Pagnell, near Grantham, the Hey. John It ford, late. Rector of. that Parish, Vicar of Liassotrhorpe, colinhirc, and formerly of Egnsnuel College, Cambridge. Aged TS ' the Rev. John White , Rector of Chrtiugue Hargrave, Suffolk. Saturday sennight. at Tpswich,in the 55d year of herage, Chevalier, relict of the late Reverend Temple Fiske OW Rector of liaddingham, in Suffolk. Sunday mineight, at the advanced age of as, Mn. nu, Lavenham, widoW of the Rev. Arthur Clark, Lae Rec, `Brent ENcigh and Gosheck, in Suffolk. The seed ult. _in Paris, of an apoplectic St, the John Hayter, M.A. Rector of Hepworth, Suffolk, and , Fellow of King's College, ILA. 1779, M.A. l7asi. The is in the patronage of the rovoat and Fellows of that Sec Mr. Ha; ter had long bra' employed In unrolling the II nouns Manuscripts, and had a salary as Chaplain to the Regent, to support him is his karats! researches. AV . SSRS. GOSS and Co. Members of the College of Surgeons London, hive &dui tidy tlieir attention for these List 17 years to the study sf rhos. der' which so rrequently embitter, and too often irsemt, inestimable Missing, matrlmor.ial The uanerosi ratings they have ltith”rto received trout persous of the Unction, and the uniform success attending theirsuperi, sir stuntmen t in such complaints, induces Them thus . po I [ . - offew,tiinir . amiantus. In all caa:s of debility or delicila, :her r,ssultlng from the too frequency of itartkipaung in tits terashionable life, the mnbounded ind.igri.ce of libt it s seciot solitary habit, which ',tokens the energy alit and destroys the Hower of youth, by producing at.iitity hit se:, and intpoteuci- In the other, they offer a safe and perm; erre. To those who, f rom such enmphints, are prevented . . Mg into the married state, and ashamed to seek fad brood their infirmities M silence, it mist be consoling to know, ever difficult or ineffectual the cure may be deirtr.ed b) Practitioners, that by a renovating and infallible method they may be restored to a mound and vigorous constitution. A CeTtal disorder, frequently contracted in a moment a indhcretioo, ant every species of Venereal infection, by a mild and never-faEil mode of treatment, is speedily and radically reereed, without reersitit ip Slier or exercise, aa eso Strictures of the Urethra 041 picas, which they are enabled to cure in a short period, with= recourse to the painful and langerous effects of the Caustic; refe. ranee' of which can be given to several Noblemen and Csentlitosn offhigh respectability, whelsave been curd in s rery then Feriae., after hpir.g laboured under strictures for many years. Married remaies, whose expectations of those tender pledges of cowl - chid happiness hay.: been defeated, it tray aim be 'a pleasing reflection to know, that by a proper petsevericct is their motedies,.the general' health is renovated, and the iingadi aunts removed. hiss_t a. Gaul _ad Co. exclusively prole:mat the cure of these particular complaints, inorder that they may tot be marked bit s mistake:. few, with t he obloquy to jut ly atichd to the ignorant empiric, think it but justice to themselves to state, that they have been properly educated and initiated into every branch of the profession , cerdfieates of which item various pitals, and testimonials tom the highest profesthstal aetberld.., they have to cenvinee any inqairer. That a redd.r.c.. io eAt warmer hemisphere of our eastern world as wall a. In other ruts emboldens them to assert, that their stesearches havir; bete con fined to diseases alreasiy enumerated, they hold out a c.7:;;....y of renovation to such as may labour under the debilitating effects of .a life passed under the torrid Pont; and farther, 0 , ..a having bad opportunities in their professional capacity of terming as ',annum acquaintance with the constitutional habits of seafaring pentads they offer to them the best assurances of immediate renal; dal the success resulting from their endeavours first induced thtm to quit the practice of the general practitioner; and Ole, ft— that pretensions constitute a fair greend fur ti dented confidence with whkh they hay; by the t übla. liberally honoured. To be consulted at their house daily, personally or 1 by patients of either sex, with secrecy, delicacy, and a Patients in the country are requested to .tate the parti, their case, age, and manner of hying, indusini, a remit advice and medicines, and tho rtl/11.4iCS will by given o . . . ded to any part of the Kingdom. GOSS and Co. Surgeons, 13, Bouverk--treet, Just published, the )Fors of Lire, a familiar COMM the above Diseases. By Goss and Co. To be bad at noster-row, and of all Booksellers, price ss, PRICE OF SIOCES ON . SATCRDA Long Aun.. India *34,479 pr. Exch. Kills 17 IS 1 012U1.- pr. Cass. for Ac. • 791: Lottery Tickets i ---- BRIDGE TO-mc 47 minute.. Sil Bk. Stock Reduced 77ii} Cons. shut 3i per Ct.B7 86i 4 per Ct. Navy shut HIGH WATER at LOWDOI . efns Atiankooe SAND 7N : .141ntal d polottetsed try linn.Koar, • a jam l ttne.c.Bar. • . fice l GP! tires '' • LI NN . U M/ TEL. — "Ltaghx. sera. R , . ;sari & tu b. sae 8. be it nr „,„ i • ghat , Lard L., at 11 , and Gy p 1111 1] the; • • . dae ms , • I of Core r *LA death cfi ITU tnok sad ori ra which oc. And 'or and Cot . the 6 th raa. 'DAY, t three yon , Was va in them whose y drowned; Cti TIU LatQ2l It the E That gate am a b , ra , , to Shin put into his • taniti upper., w e I d iodget! 'Jr * F einted ostande ca. th ilt e nn eteuaL EnZ :. l *e Parlic4' „' R vl fr° T2l North= ? . p-ry. Cara, Esq. of the MI Taplaiu tO " tilllll4l) erwt* Igcg L'PPst Esq. of anghter tf T. L g . to 71111 *di uerpool, Remy A l cant i e, John IL itunhorre, Lb. ity rohridv. evingum and of her age, 7,`, ?T! isle Cena 1. Mn.s (irk. c , Lte &C t. ON the the Reverted r i ek a and format Tea Wt. The hug Ern r that Society.— / the 11:rt-J1s a to the Hue Leo the of the Royal ul utly deratrd yof those dire- 11414 ' ru prreect, tht 5- u.aarrota aryls. ; of thr fir.t r superior mode thus poblicly* • wbw in' tine In the pie. sus of 11hr:titan:, au rr of Oh. mind, . iu the ow at: and perinatal* . ?rev mud emu- eliet brood ow: to know, how- em.ed by oter :hos to 1 • by !Pr -% or :art• lettl•stit" ncut.rjta 1 . 44:* r. K 14 ti 1.191!'. )11K3 11 . ttrr _a OLD .D.IILZY SZ.V4XS. Saturday seventeen priscr.ets nere • %mni were convicted of.felnnies. At five 6t the RECORDER passed sentence on the followi ng Michael Bwalne, Joseph Anderson, Thetr-s IL'ii3o 7N , ward Smith, Sarah Foriester, t C 2 ; limey Green, :taries Cowden, and Col - minis Meseiry—'4, 4; for life. Willkm llrvan, &tinAt,!titan; [Parks. Tack, Charles * Watkins, Thomas larowr, Thema,. ~,,ajay Tyndale, William Tibbetts, hentslitesedipg, and (- for Seven I mit. thrib .orent, aged U, sad John .Neternan, to be i t , or.a rat in the Bowe of Correction, and kept to bard L Henry Kirq, Mann, ZOOM to ec iur e 7;i,on...ci for &ix movt.s. -.tare