Star. — London, England, 1819-01-18 00:00:00

I t • p. I ~~ / 1 t ~. dered the Liberty of the Press, and the Habeas Cor pus Act, and Trial by Jury, as sacred parts of the Constitution. • The people of England had enjoyed the Liberty of the Press since the revolution, and GOD fortiid they should . ever lose it. He felt a greater anxiety on this subject, freer a circumstance that had lately come to his knowledge. An ingenious foreigner, Who was perhaps acqUainted with the engines of this Government, hed published a work, since translated, Leading to chew that there were disadvantages con-, meted with this sacred privilege, which reedered the protection of it nmadvisablb. The • man who would assail this important sight should be consi dered as a public enemy ; and in proportion as the right which he attempted to violate was sacred, that violation ought to be punished. The Liberty of the Press meant, that all might drink as they pleased, and publish what they thought , without previous controul. But th at liberty was incompatible with the power to destroy . private character. If thatwere the definition of the liberty of. the press, it would be a despotism under which no man could live. This . sacred power had been ribusnl by Mr. Clement's: who had wielded the mighty engine that gave and tack away character, and had the• power to throw open the doors of the prison -house, with a hand . guided by none of those sentiments of benignity so cheethig to the possessor. The person pleaded for was a man of an honest, temperate life—unhappy-- Lad been a captive for several months without guilt ; and against this object was the authority of the press exercised ; against him were the minds of the people misened, by the sting of - this publication, which re pAsented bins as a man capable of treason, spoil, and revolution. Why should this be added to the stock of calamity of him.-who had been snatched from his family, with whom he had enjoyed the sweets of his industry too dearly to think of disterb int; theland in which his labours had been rewarded? With respect to-the damages . , it was only necessary to say that the plaintiff had been traduced when he liachm means of vindicating himself; and that the iejury had Foie into welded circulation by the in tim:tee of him to whop fie owed this outrage upon hit feelings. • The - following evidence was then called: Ann Ward (examined by Mrs DenssAts).—Witness - is the daughter of the plaintiff, Frank %Ward ; he is a lace-manufacturer, conducting his own business, and employing ten or twv„lve journeynten. WitEess re-* membered the • constables coming to her father's house on the 10th June, 1617, and searching it, but they did . not take any thini? away. They remained there nearly an houri.and when they went away, her fadier followed them. This way en the Tuesday and she did not see her father again till she saw him- in prison on the Seturday followinee lie did not return to his family till the middle of November. - Samuel Payne, Lsq. (examined by Mr. Currir).— Witness is a Solici:r in Nottingham. He remem-1 bleed meeting the pi.tinti .(Ward)- on the 10th oft June, in the street at Nottingham. After relating what had happened at his house, he asked what wits I the best :wide of obtaining redress? Witne:s ad vised him to apply to the Magistrates, where they! were sitting. Witness understood that be did do so, aad that he was by them committed to prisoe. Cross-examined by Mr. Gees:zee—The plaintiff did not call upon him at his house ; but when he met him in the street, he was coming in a direction from his own house to that of the witness. Ile believed the plaintiff had previously laia under. some suspi cion with the Magistrates, on accoueit of his having been the treasurer of a -subscription raised for the purpose of defending some pin-sons who were tried at Leicester.. John Holmes (examined by Mr. DasistAN).--Wi tens is a lace-maker at Nottingham ; he knew Oliver t care in Jude, 1817 e witness was apprehended and sent to Coldbath-fields prison ; Ward, the plaintiC, was in prison at Nottingham at the same time as! witness, and he saw him ironed to a man of the' name of Haynes, when they • were all brought to Coldbath-fields prison together. William Cliffe gave evidence to the same effect, and added, that he and the plaintiff, after remaining in Coldbath-fields prison about a week, were taken together to Oxford Castle, and there kept in clew confinement - till the 13th of November, 1617. (Mr. Demean was proceeding with the examination of this witness, as to the manner of their confinement, on • which Mr. GURNEY rose and objected to the questions as irrelevant to the case before the Court; and the Court being of the'saine opinit a,' after some conver sation, the witness was ordered to steed down.) George Goodger is deputy Publisher of the 06- senor. the sale of the Paper is very great. Its sale on Sunday, the 9th of Novera'a,r, 1517. was a.id. the Monday edition (200 J, exclusive of the nn stamped ones, of which be keew nothing. He could net form any idea how many were sent out unstamp they not having passed through his hands. The Monday Observer had twice, v..hen public interest was excited, after the regular publication, published an additional impression upon unstaniped sheets, with a blank leaf, in the way of the one produced. Robert Webster (examined by Mr. DENMAN)...-.. ViitriCSS is a letter-carrier at Derby. Oa Monday, the larli of November, 1817, he received a great go-laity of the Observer Newsrapers. They were d..livered to him by Mrs. Eaton, die v-;fe of.the jailer at Derby, who desired him to distribute. them gra teitcisly ; and she gave him a shillinte far so, doing. delivered them to the Lawyers, the Doctors, and the Gentlemen of the town. Thomas Cook is a lette:-carrier at Leicester. Met received a quantity of Monday 01 vvcrs in Novem bt - m, 1817 ; Irs thought as•manv a: 209. He eeiv gd them at the Post-office with his letters; thous* it was not usual to receive them in that way... Ile /as desired to distribute the gratuitously, and accord. ingly he did sa---some of them in thrtown; and others he gave to the country carriers, to take into the country. There was another letter:carrier At Leicester, and he also received the like quantity of Monday Observers to distribute in the same way. Witness received two or three shillings at the Post r office for his trouble. This closed the evidence for the plaiutiff. The al leged printed libel was then read by the clerk,. and compared with it (as set krth in the record). Mr. 4.ooLvitu4 took sqveral objections on account of inaccuracy, but they fere over-ruled by the Coati Mr. Gummy then Jose to address the Jury in de. fence. He heartily concurred in the observation of Li; Li:trued Vac'id, that political feelings ought not to enter jet.° discussions at the bar; at the same time, he could not help observing that his Learned Friend's practiCe, in the manner of conducting this cause, little accorded with his professions. His Learned Friend could not truly say, that politics had not been. mixed up in the statement of his client's case. If any person bad only heard three-fourths or four-fifths of j his Learned Friend's very eloquent speech , he must? have imagined that this was not an action ag ain stl Mr. Clement, the Proprietor of the Observer News paper, hat an action against the Secretary of State, for illegally imprisoning and cruelly oppressing the plaintiff. In truth, he (Mr. Gurney) believed that the statement which his Learned Friend was instruc ted to make, was much more the object of this action than any damages which the plaintiff could affect to have sustained, or could hope from the defendant. His Learned Friend, in the course of his address, had let out some. things that were rather extraordinary— some things a little inconsistent with what every man knew as matter of history—somethings which would ' excite in one's mind a suspicion that the plaintiff really could not have sustained any injury or damage from this publication. His Learned Friend would represent to the Jury, that the shocking outrages which were committed in the neighbourhood of Not- Aingliam, which called for the interference of the 'Legislature, and which produced in that district a reign of terror, not unlike that which prevailed dur ing the French Revolution, arose from the oppression ' and cruelty of the masters towards their journeymen and that Mr. Ward, recollecting that he had once himself been a poor journeyman, would not treat those persons in the oppressive and extortionate man ner in which they had been treated by other masters. !fe (Mr. Gurney) believed he might take it as matter of history that this representation of his Learned Friend was nut quite true; but whatever was the' cause of those disturbances, it was as foreign to the matter before the Jury as to any other cause tried during the Eirtirigs, or which remained to be tried.— Great part of his Learned Friend's speech was ad dressed to this toint, namely, that Mr. Ward, who, when he ceved to be sure of the approbation, and ceased tb become an object of confidence with one set of persons (who those were it was easy to judge), had become an object of distntst and suspicion with all ; that Mr. Ward was arrested—that he was ar rested under a charge of treasonable practices, and confined from the 16th of June, until the 13th of November ; and that every possible attempt was made to excite unfavourable feelings respecting him. Out slimly, if Mr. Waed's imprisonment were the act of the Eiecutive authority, and ifthe defendant were it norant of the object of it, not one wend said upon tbii subject could be applicable to the case agakist kir. Clement, who could have. nothing to da with the pi:tied:Ps itaiirisonment. If the defendant had no thing to do with that.act (justifiable or not); surely. the introduction of .such .a topic could only he for the purpese of exciting. an .nitdae impression against him, and make him account fer the conduct rf others. His Learned Friend had stated, that the plaintiff had been ground down and oPposed. The Jury were not to assume that merely upon the statement of Ns' Learned Friend, who had al,o said that the plaintiff WAS deprived of the means of seeking redress, in con : 0 sequence of the passing of as Act of Indemnity. -It o was true that tlra Legislature had passed an Act of Indemnity ; and amongst other reasons assigned for. that measure were, first, heiause it was notorious that a treasonalsle conspiracy hid existed in the cumin y ; and next. that it would not be fit or proper that the lives of those who had given information ofsuch con• spiracy shoat be put in hazard from the malice of their enemies, should their names be given. But these considerations had nothing whatever to do with the qeestiou how before the Court, which simply was, what injury the plaintiff had sustained from the defendant? This was the siiTle question for the consideration of the.; ury, and that was to beascertained by discovering as well as they could, in what the injury consisted. Did they believe that the plaintiff had silaained any injury from this publication? Did they believe that those who thought ill of. him before, would think worse of him for the article which appeared in the Merger V Did they believe that those who thought well of him before, would think worse of him by reading the supposed libel?. If they did not, why then what injury could this plaintiff have sustained, which would-entitle him to call. upon the Jury for any amount of damages against the .defendant ? But there was one single feature in this case which would .at once decide the point for their consideration. The plaintiff stated in his declaration that he had deser vedly acquired ;he good opinion of all his fellow subjects, and that for the purpose of bringing him into.public scandal, infamy, and disgrace, the libel in question was published ; and it concluded by al leging that divers of his neighhourshad thought the worst of him on that account. If this were the case, why did he not bring his action amongst his neigh bours ? Why did he. who lived in Nottingham, and who told the Jury that he had lost the good opinion. and high estimation of all his neighbours, in conse e -nce of this publication, try this case where his character and conduct were best known,. amongst those neighbours whose estimation he had lost by means of this libel? He (Mr. Gurney) must say that he thougl:tthe conduct of the plaintiff, in bring ing his action lt2A.) miles from Nottingham, in a place where be was utterly unknown, was the clearest and most decisive proof that he had suffered no da• mage whatever. Nothing was more clear than that a man who complained of being injured in the esti snatlon of his neighbours, and had, in fact, suffered that injury, would bring his action among those ,neighbours, instead of waiting . for a considerable leii i 3th of time, and then bring it before aJury by whom he was unknown:, when in fact he ought have tried his case at Nottingham, either in March or. July last. Such conduct on the part of the plain. tip was decisive judgment. against himself. Admit ring, however, that the plaintiff was Mankato a ver / diet, the only. remaining question was, the amount of damages he was entitled to receive, The defendant was undoubtedly liable to a verdict agairisthimielf. - His Learned Frimiti admitted that the Obuiecr was l .one of die most respectable public journals, and re k4lected credit generally upon its conductors. It should be recollected that the defendant Was the . Proprietor of the Paper, and not the author of the article, which was !Olen. to him by a person who sawed him that it was well founded. It appeared, howeeeri that be had been misinformed in that respect ; and certain!! he •(51r. Gurney) alid:.not stand there to amen its truth. The defendantliad put no justification or. the record, and therifore he had not aggravated the sup posed Cause of offence. The Jury would recollect that the amount of darnagei Tibia they - shonld give must be measured by the amoutit of the injury ; and he who did not bring his action, and-try his case, ' where he affected to have received the injury, and where the injury could be best estimated, gave the strongest judgment against himself that the injury had been little or none. The Cuter , Rivets, in charging the Jury, said no man could doubt that the matter contained in the al leged libel was calculated to injure the character of the plaintiff, and asno attempt had been made to justify it, die necessary consequence was, that it must be taken to be untrue. Several topics had been 'ad dressed to the Jury, on the one side and on the other, which, in his Lordship's humble jud,-;ninnt, could in no way he involved in this case. This . art had no thing to do with the policy or impolicy of the Legis lature, in suspending the Ilbeas Corpus Act ; "cher the long detail of matter contained in the libel was true or untrue had nothing to do with the ques tion which the Jury had to tiny, the only considera tion being the damage which the plaintiff had sus tained by having Ins nan;e coupled with the dis graceful and highly criminal acts detailed. in the libel. It appeared that this statement was published at a time when the plaintiff was in confinement upon charges for which he was likely to be brought to trial ; and certainly such a publication was calculated to prejudice the minds of those by whom he would probably have been tried, had the proceedings gone further. Nothing was more improper than publica tions tending to prejudice the cases of persons merely committed on suspicion of offences, because nothiri.7 was mole likely to affect the interests of public jus. lice. It had been very properly observed upon, that the plaintiff had declined to bring his action at Not , tingham, where his character might be supposed to . be best known ; and the Jury would take that cir cnmstance into consideration in estimating the da mages, and in doing so, they swot. c 1 exercise that temper and discretion which the due administration of i lustice required. , fhe Jury retired for about half an hour, and re turned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages WO/. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. Saturday the Countess of Moteros: appeared, at tended by her solicitor, and exhibited articles of the peace against Mr. RsGeri Greerscu, surgeon, who appeared at the table, accompanied by Vickery, the liow•straet officer. Mr. Stirling; the Clerk of the Peace . for the County ' of Middlesex, then read the articles exhibited by the Countess I\ 1o: ton against Mr. Greerson, They were of considerable length, andimputed to the gentleman t!,e commission of various incoliet ens :::id inconside rate acts and threats, to her I.s .lysi,ip, unless she complied with • his demand for :T:Jney. The sums were variously named, but :Lc gencral average claim appeared to be a cheque flea her Ladyship's man of business for £lOO. It • appeared that Mi . 3reerson • had sent, through the twe s penny post, to her Lady- ship a number of letters, in which he• threatened, unless he received an adequate pecuniary recornpence, to publish and expose the whole particelare -of an attertspt Which he alleged had been made upon his ilife by Sir Francis Buller, her Ladyship's father. The Lezhibitant stated, that she returned no answer to these repeated applications, and that on the 11th instant she received another letter through .the post ti'om Mr. Greerson, in which he peremptorily demanded 1001. as the condition of his suppressing a work, of which he enclosed her the announcing posting-bill, which. he said should be stuck up in etery corner of the metropolis. In the letter •containing this enclo— • sure were these extraordinary words—" I don't wish to hold but threatening langnage, but be it known to your Ladyship that there-was a Bellingham, and that there is a Greerson." • s • • The exhibitant further stated, that the repetition' of these letters, and the tone. nd tenour of their con tents, many of which charged Sir F. Buller with hav ing conspired to assassinate Mr. Greerson, who-said he had balls in his body to shew the-efitct and perse verance of those who conspired against him, induced her Ladyship to apply for the protection of the law against this individual. She swore that she Was in great bodily fear from him, and therefore prayed the Court that he should be bound over in sufficient sureties to keep the. peace towards her. The CHAIRMAN then addressed the defendant— Mr. Greerson, you must give the Court sufficient sureties to keep the peace against the Countess Mor, :on, in consequence of the articles of the peace exhi bited by her Ladyship against you. Mr. Greerson—Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen on the Bench, will you hearme patiently. while 1 state the reasons which induced me to send these letters to ' Lady Morton ? I admit I sent them. I deny no thing of the charge. The CHAIRMAN—Sir, we can only call upon you for securities. We cannot enter into irrelevant matter. Mr. Greerson again attempted to go into justifica tory reasons for sending the letters, but was stopped by the Chairman, who said, " Were we here trying the cause, we should willingly and patiently hear every thing you might wish tonrge in your defence ; at present our course is restricted to the simple neccs- ' ' sity of taking sureties for you to keep the peace to wards Lady Morton; your . gir these sureties i (which must.be done) dues not at all touch won or !compromise your claims or grievancei r bstior great or small, on any body else. Mr. WALFORD, on the part of Lady . Morton, ' Moved the Court that the exhibitant should receive '124 hours notice of bail, as the!coinplaint was of so serious a nature. The Court grants. this motion. and Mr. Greerson ' was removed from Court, after declaring that he ' wculd get beak the massur.required. At the Old-Bitiley Sessions Ori•tiaturdsty, J. Wilkit,; fro. stealing 19 sheep, din property- of W. and C. Preston, was. capitally convicted; The folkiWing were Convicted :of felonies; viz. • T. Aim, leriterdingt shirt, and two•pair of stockings; F- W . lnlarns; fir stealing a hsodherchitif ; W. Callighan, for stealing torierpantt; * T. Thanalson, for Keallgg fs. worth of cop .. 171 X/7. :evaturu--On Saturday, Idra. Grows% the wires( Alr. Alan.% vtimis.easninitted for sending artesian letters to .the Ceeskteesal. Afgrsoa, applikel, to. Mr.Riganm, far an order to visit hathusbiiid In pried, which the wordty Magistrate vary may greeted. Mrs. Orserson is a very respectablo-loraing. woman, and appeared in ;teat distress. CLERICAL ixTrzi.r6Evet. CASIBETDOP., st,xl;AnT The Hu!min Prize for the tait yczr Las 'Wm. Pedcia, Esq. V.A. of St. John's College, "The probable Wilmette° of Revclation upon Heathen Philosophers and the . Morals of the 1 Edward Willey, Esq. of Trinity Hall, was inittzd Bachelor of Civil Law. OXFORD, JANUARY It. Thursday, die first day of Lent Tarr., tb: 1 were conferred : Rex. Robert Hervey Knight, of St. Johr.'s Itev. Win. Stokenhouse„ Thomas Luwia kiaEbta, Thomas Eyre, of Bralenocs? College. The Rev. Henry flails, B.A. of elnist College. was incorporated of Balliol College.—Yesterdays ' Rolls, of baillol College, was admitted IVaster ECCLESIASTICAL PROM(if The Rev. James Ward, D.D. is presentad Bitlingham St. Peter, Norfolk. Rev. J. Boole, late Curare of Orton, Nora, Topton St. Peter's and Toyntt.n Ail Saints, A melancholy accident happened on tween Glasgow and King• well, on Saul instant, about a mile and a half from 7 the Glasgow side. A- four-wheel ca sccnding with considerable. rapidity The moon was shining faintly, and was conducted to the near side of the way for the lordly vehicle, by its pr: Taylor, mealdcaler it Fenwick, but a, this inecaution the were bron the cant overturned, Hugh Taylor kill and a man who was riding in tl!?. much injured, and unable to er:ricati it. The carriage passed on. Fortunate' the post-boy came up, discovered tl the survivor, released him, and szt fi him some assivtaw:e. iviranwhile a took up the too men, and carried the_ L. is s:;ppose,l that the font while struggling ;.or liberty. %ttuck -• man on the temple. The other man hull- about the head, and is still confit We are requested to inform our Niessrr. COOPER and Co. 8-it...eons, ofe (;treat Charlotte-street, ft iai i• ma sequence of their eitencire practice, rommod Atka: of patients at tleWest-e ectablithed a Medical Boa,1! in Wood. ford-street, a few doors from Bonil-t Physician, of 40 years great eminence, reside, and v..here all' irately attend, the whole.of whom are Royal colleges—that thousands have • pe'rtect health by their united talent acknowleqed, many of whom had bee! from Hospitals, and otherwise imprer They are consulted at Woodstock-I 10l street, from Eight in the Morning Night ; and at the Medical Board, C Iliac kit i ars-road, front twelve till el/J:1: —lklcellanics hare advice gratis ever six til; eight, at.both houses, and on St until twi;lve 11. Messrs. ( beg to observe, they have no conne, other Concern. therefore aH letter; a, adjoining Mae urrzr.r6EN'et. iF., stixi:AnT is. I e last yczr Las been zi y ,; •,!, :o . t. iiihn's College, for his j c , r . ( 1 Revelation upon the wrhiept et:-. Le . Morals of the Heathen NV.,ii••• 'rinity Hall, uas on Weda, sele , i W. JANILIAWP 16. Lent Tara, the followin g De th4 ......". -- gilt, of St. Johr.'s Colleg e . NC Pliontts Luwia liaghes, and •;; 12. .7.-- -- ...." College. .A. of Clulit College, ex tl i n .. l College.—Yesterday the Rev. )I s ,r,;, admitted Muter of Arts. ' CAL PROMOTION& 1 I.D. is presented to the Rec. - 4. 3 .1 crt' 416. i of Orton, Nora, to the C e r at i fie r' p nittm All Stints, Lit:cannier, dri ia1i n . . 13,1.1 a l t: i ....i .t . :l i i : ai i,ie 7 7 lpfio ti l e .ilit d otcymsa o ra n iiciu tl airg i nd e egas r yrl c .... :. et i si i tdioa . t. vest by that liact sod P Fr ill e eli mai fitintly, and a car: stan:it r any ear tide of the road to tr , :ii Pro ide, by its priprietcr, I! ..! 2 sale ot zonwick, but n wiiiiiun;i: ‘.- s he ..1, were I7tunght in are.: ' c :, day ugh Tayler killed on the spe, it,l riding in t!!.... same cart re!, tole to er:ricate hinicelf frvn on. Fortunately shortly aStn. , discovered the situation c i, him, and set forward to se.r.4 inleanwhile a evadl passir3 and carried them fci war,: to ise,l that the Mot of the L one , as ram berty, set uck the ur.foituLe r B 1 'be other man is very mac td is still confine I to bei. 1* ,o inform our Itea.iers, .11. a... K di a igeons, of ebarlutte Hoe*. Mac kft Inn. ma.!, have, in co:, th :ii.ve practice, and for the ac. :s at the Went-end of the ton, to 60411 in WoodstucL• stren, ("7. a id t from Bond-street, where z expe:if.aci:, and a Surgeon ci w and where all the Board alts- • 2.01 whom are Members of fit v loos:Ends have been resterresi to a naited talents is universal:l 1 f whom had been &vex - ult.'. lerwise imprepclv treatei..— ,onastock-I rouse, Wco.litock. the Morning mail Eir , lit f't A lical Board, eharlotte-k.are, i twelve till eiet in the eveaint,.. ice gratis every evening crini nses, and an Su Celery rro.:e.'-7-1 J. B. Messrs. (*Quern lr.,i '..,:. lave no connection w'qh in , 7e aH letter; al eto be direcA ijoining Blackfriars-roa3. 1 OF PARTNETISti I :. .Clement's-hint. Ward and Etctt, io French and Drati,..r, Sore lad &Isere. .1. and J. Apr, York, R. end J. Bailey, Birminglac., Awe and Ilarshind, riallotksfrid7, Lrers. Ilerekall and Co. Old l'cal, llraadocrtet-bulldirgs, mercht L., iris, Lancashire, bleachers. J. nd Oran and Carter, Liverpool, ern:- rey, Lime-street-square, trerele..ris. riday-etrtet, wholesale Ilnen-dt v ets r ilund-strc:t, e..V.net-makers. W.I. oollen-elot'l.min . 'assurers. V• - ilst a as. Eensett and I'age, Lail-L., "inuE6. • baton 13-innington, Notts, to TL'- f the tate J. W. Roberts, Lsq. a ptonshire. A. Rector of Greatham, ILcti, '3 ... Rev. Thomas Cooke. Jetts, Wm. Turner, Req. First lie.- ais, to Martha, daughter of Naw : :: athedral, the Rev. Thomas Hal, )li- ;rep.don, Water-lane Maidstone, ti gain LINVIL, Third Devonshire Militi:- st :"1 of Win. Manning, Fuq.•111.1 ) . Elizabeth tdolarda, eldest diug'..t.r e Rochford, Lincolnshire. or.el Charles lm con, of the 85% Re- laughttr cf the late Jar.ies Sherle.a.i, w's Ilolharn, J. Nicholson, Esq. c: and, daughter of the late Rev. do.efh Sussex. Court, Gl , ,ticestershire, Robert Ile- Itobtrt Bateson Harvey, of Laagki lota Jane, only daughter of the Lie % Court, Somerset, Esq. DIED. • of Long,:toelt, near Stockbrilgei r 1 I.,th. e, Cornwall, the Rev. Thomas T. .nts, in Drury-lane, E. H. Feynic . .tr, hearrica! Circles, having been L.. - .:•! [vs. ho Illec4 Horse Tin, Salisburfiellt lughes, inti. L.A. of l'embroke Ce.- . Ma.-, itlr4ale. Ch-rch, Tinnier. ' tyghni fever, life.s Sarah Ecist-nO, tin John Eati , :rdi, RN, aged IF. of the Rev. James Parsots, Holy- (harder Stiittd, Esq. of Tpswich, fer- al the r..,,t Sulfulk Militia, and Sal r for that ciuriy. WorkilOUSC at Rothcrfheld, Mina. and five months, having beeo Lerner. She retaiikAl h. r faculties u7Ltil the had been several. times seen valkiig ick, since her last birth-day. —_. lOCKS ON SATURDAY. I India Stock, 231 f cc. (hit. India Bonds 8 3 87 pr. Exch. Bills 19 20 Omn. If pr. • Cons. for Ac. 7.91* 1 L Lottery Tickets A:l9l*. ....... • - • DV& 'AWL P" 0 I Lisbon 0 0 1 Make , 0 0 I France 3 0 t I liarnburgh 1 g • , 1 I SV:g4ca 0 5 _• • - lIDON 8R11,16E TO-NOR RO V. • :le minutes after d il plibibihed by XVIII. KIOI3, Picketed :e, Tgpiple-par. to Charlotte-lioose, DISSOLUTIONS OF PARTNE Jaeiton and Atkinsou,-.aoment's-lant. Cr:, -Exchanget, c0 , 14 . ...cttnt. Freilth and .creel, lia7market, tailors and &vers. J. t tallier.' aid leather-sdlers. H. and J. Bat ders iv paper and oils: Lowe and Cheshire, muslin -onamtiCacturers. Iterchall dyers. F. and E. T. I;u.:n, Ilruadodreet-butidir , J. and W. I.ontax.lWhiti biri., Lanca,idre, J. Spri, Beth, surgeons. Dean and Car:,:r, rnereh tins. Lairg and !'tarry, Lime-street-square, Nunn and GAinstwrough, Frlday-strcrt, whop T. and 11. Vii. 'renter, New hand-strcet, c.ll .ker ar.d Co. 'Manchester, woollen-clet'l-man . and Co. Sbefhtid, merchants. I.‘nsett and Vancheiter-warehousetnen. Rev. S. Davenport, oL Staten Boonington, ntira, youngest lau g hter of the late J. W. Thoriaby Grange, Northamptonshire. C. B. Godbold, M.A. Hector of Greatharn, Dien Clam, daughter of the Rev. Thomas Cooke. Monday, at Nesting Was. Turner, E tenant lltls •Ligin Dragoons, to 'Martha, dui& Spence, Esq. of Upton. Monday, at Rochester Cathedral, the Rev. " ulster of the Minis/ Cengregadon, Water-lane, Mr.. Laws, widow of Captain Ltses, Third - Monday, Frederick, eldes. two of Win. in of Combs: Bank, Kent, to. Eiizalpeth Eduzurs. of E. Turner rsq. of Stoke Rochford, LincelnShire. Tuesday,ldeutenant-Color.el Charles lm can, I giutent, to Mary Ahager, daughter cf the late Esq. of Percy-street. Thursday, at St. Andrew's, licatorn, J. Rochester, to Mrs. Swingland,tioughter of . W7le, Rector of I'enhurst, Sums. Thursday, at Ilighnam-Court, Glr.ncestershire. wry, Esq. (Attest son of Sir Robert Bateson 7 Park, Burks, Ban. to Jemitua line, only dam John Rau Collins, et Hatch Court, Somerset, DI ED. Rev. IL Arnold, Rector of Lonooch, near many years a resident of At .S Ewan farwna;e, Cornwall, the llamley. Monday, at his apartments, is Drury-lane. F..sq. well known in the riratrica'. Circle.s, years on the Provir.cial Stages. ' Tuesday se'nnight, at tha Diae4 Horse fi4 years, the Rey. John Hughes, ism. D.A. loge. and late Curate of St. Ma 47 idcolalea Tuesday, at Margate, of tyrhua fever. Mi youngest daughter of Captain John Eaw:rds Thursday, Sophia, wife of the Rev. J.um well-strmt, Oxford. Friday, in Ilk 74th year, (helm Stisttd, me: ly I.ieutenant-Colonel of the r.. Sulfulk years a Justice of the PLace for that csurty. Friday se'nnight, in the Workisouse i at , Maynard, aged 100 years and five motlths, the 2d of August, 171 S. She retalucd h. t day before her death, and had been several about the village, irkb a stick, slue bcr last PRICE OF sr . . Reduced 78ati Cons. 7M 7s; 31 per Ct.B7„ 88 4 per Ct. 961. N 97 Navy 10633; Long Anns. 201 5-16 MAILS am Dar.....um Dublin Waterford Guernsey and Jersey. 0 Helfand • 0 Sanders • 0 HIGH WATiiit at LONDO idamig • Aftogisse LOSPON: Printed ai . 4l pulptiJwcl 6; 1 1 Flue, Togole-Der. A 6 - p I