Star. — London, England, 1828-05-14 00:00:00

!., '~ 'a' little intermission . s of time, he remained in the public service down to the period of his death. He need' hardly state to any man conversant with such matters, that the emoluments derived from the first offices-of the State were not of an amount or a nature to enable ' the individuals holding them to make provision for their families. He should be much nearer the truth if he asserted that every such individual was compelled to draw upon his private means in order to support a certain style, which in this country he was expected to do upon a liberal, and even a handsome scale. It was not, therefore, a matter of surprise that Mr. Canning was led to encroach upon his private in come and to diminish those sources of provision fot his family, of which they would otherwise have had the benefit. He spoke in the hearing of those who kliellesthat Mr. Canning had, at an early period of his life . , made such an encroachment, which he would have bad no occasion to do it he had pursued the pro. fession in which he first embarked. Such, then, was the state of Mr. Canning's means in 1822, when he received an offer of the Governor -Generalship of India. He need not state to the House that a man holding the station which Mr. Canning did, would not be likely very rea dily to accept a situation, which, however desirable on the score of emolument and influence, was to remove him from nester and dearer connections, and from far higher objectiof ambition to a mind like his, He thought it was not too much, therefore, to suppose, that in ac. cepting that offer, Mr. Canning was influenced solely by the desire of recompenting his family for the en croachments which he had been compelled to make upon their future provision. Having accepted the office s he made ever y prepatation to depart for his destination. At that period an event, to which he need not call the recollection pf the House, as it was. too well remem• ber ed, left open a situation which was always tilled by, men of tree higheft t rient and character in the country. That event, to which he could never recur without the deepest sense of sorrow, left open the oitice of Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; and it was thought the ap pointment of Mr. Canning to that distinguished post, would be highly conducive to the general interests of the country. Ili, Majesty, therefore, determined to make that appointment, and Mr. Canning accepted it without hesi tation. Giving up the opportunity which was open be fore him for placing his family in affluence, he accepted that which the public interest required, and again sacri ficed his own private means and prospects. In that act he thought Mr. Canning established a claim upon the cook try. So strongly did those who acted with him at that time feel the extent of the sacrifice he had made, that they advised his Majesty to grant him a pension from the funds out of which his Majesty was enabled to make such grants ; and in the year 1823 a pension of 3,0004 a year was accordingly granted. At that time there. was every reason to suppose that Mr. Canning's life would be prolonged to the ordinary duration of human existence.• There was no reason to expect the event by which the House was deprived of so distinguished a Member. If Mr. Canning had lived, and had had an opportunity of repairing his private fortune from this source, he should not have been justified in calling upon the House to make this provision for his family ; but as daring the short period of his life after the granting of the pension he continued to hold his offices, he never 'received the former, and his family consequently never derived the smallest benefit from it. Such were the 'circumstances under which lie thought it hii duty to 'recommend the House to make some provision for Mr. Canning's family ; and he should now proceed to point out the form in which he thouglitit most expedient that such a provision should be made. If he had been dis posed to follow precedents, he might with strict justice have considered it in the light of a debt owed by the country, and which the Government were justified in defraying. He might also have proposed to the House • the same mode of provision for certain branches of Mr. Canning's family as bid been frequently adopted in cases that were in sortie degree analogous ; but he had 'declined doing so, because that might not have been either the most beneficial or the mod acceptable mode to the family, and becaUse it most incur an expense in the first instance which would not be convenient to the - country. He had therefore preferred adopting the 'course of amending this Act, so as to continue the same pension to a surviving member of Mr. Canning's fa mily, which'he would have had if he had lived. The propositioti, therefore, that he should make was to this effect, that, in consideration of Mr. Canning never having received etre portion of the pension which had some years .ago been granted to him, that the amount, of that pension should be placed in the hands of trus tees for the benefit of his son. The Right Hon. Gen tleman thought the most expedient way of carrying that pleteintb effect would be to amend the Bill which had been passed when the sinecures were done a 141 with., And his reastia for adopting such a course was. b*ause 'hitt for the introduction et that Bill, it woul f in all probability have been wholly unnecessary for him or -any one to have brought forward any proposition on the subject. That Bill had been ;Opted by tft 'because it was considered rightur glee to the Crown some means of rewarding meritorious: services in lieu of the sinecure offices which- were al?olished. Were those offices still in existence, could any bne pp - posefor an instant that one of them would not tptie, been give*, *to the son of Mr. Canning ? If the. House referred tre .'the manner in which those deices had generally been disposed of, it would be satiated befottisSill doubt, tbat such would have been WI case. - When he looked through the list of the *lens who now filled the re maining few of these offittik he found himself borne out in that statement. Am the number was the son "of one who was Once Prime Mister of the country . ; and a dear friend of his. He said, therefore, that looking sat the previous conduct of the Crown, it was impossible to doubt that had not the Bill which he "proposer" to amend been passed, Mr. Canning's son would have been provided for by the Crown, tied 'he should not have been under the necessity of Making any motion upon the subject. If there Were anething excessive in the remuneration which he prbposed,lhe could then see some reason for objection being made to it; bit as there was nothing of the kind * he could anticipate no opposition. And he was the more confirmed in that opinion when be considered that the provision proposed would not exceed in amount that which would have been granted by the Crown if no change in the system bad taken place. He therefore thought that the motion be should make would be fairly entitled to the support, and approbaticm of the House. If the proposition were adopted, it would afford means for the education of Mr. Canning's son; it would supply the exigencies of his family, together with the means for restoring a for tune dilapidated in a long course of public service; and it would also supply a future provision for his son.— Having thus stated the nature of his proposition, the cause of it, and the means by which he wished to carry It into eietution, hedid not feel that it would be meet serylot tier so trouble the House longer thad for a very few minutes. If any one should be of opinion that he would have acted more correctly than he had dose had he detailed Mr. Canning's services. he would ' beg to state, that hp had purposely and advisedly ab,- . .1 .stained from doing so . He had 'acted in accordance! with precedent—not fronao slavish adherence to prece dent, but from a perfect conviction .that a more sale.. ivy course could not be pointed out. In a popular teviininent there must always be a variety of opinions as to the merits of a Minister. It was not for him to pretend to estimate the services of ‘ Mt Pinning, and be felt that they lived to near the period of his decease to pass upon them an impartial opinion. The task mit be confided to the titure histocien.J-(Hear). But al., though they had lived too near the. time of Mr..Cao ning's death to be able to appreciate *impartially the merits of Mr. Canning's servicesohey did not live too near to be able to decide that& possessed distinguished abilities; that those abilities were devoted to the service of his country, to the destruction of his health, and of his fortune.—(Hear). They did not live too near the time of his death to decide that his services called for their grateful recognition, and therefore he proposed— " That the Chairman of the Committee be directed to move for leave to bring in a Bill to amend an Act paned in the .57th of his late Majesty, entitled,' An Act to enable his Majesty to recompense the services of persons holding high official situations.' • Lord ALTHORP said. he could not help expressing his astonishment that the Right Hon. Gentleman should, under the peculiar circumstances . of the country, hive come forward with ropitaiiion. When he looked at, the stai,eof theOuntyy, the finance.' greatly der,angid, the working nienutactutets labouring wader. privation and distress, the shipping interest petitioniag for inquiry. and protection, he could hardly describe the proposition as otherwise than as an insult to the country- - (Hear.) What was the real. state of. thilles7 . Was dui House ready, if it agreed to the proposition, to lay on new taxes? and if it did lay on new taxes, what certainty had it that.they beleeied ? The question before itsConis mittee of Inquiry was not as to what iedoctions should be made in use.ess offices, but as to which of the useful and beneficial d sirtmeiits should., horn theoecessitizs of the times, be tOrtailcd.,,inidt - -4.lrninilede?-(Hear.) And that. let it int remembered, arose not so much from t e necessary current expenditure, as from the berthas !list upon the country 'by the list orpensions7-that !list i:h the Right hian. Gentleman proposed to en large. Under these circumstances, berould not feel that he did his duty it he did not oppose the motion. The Right Hon. Gentleman had not put it upon any legal claim, or upon any claim of 'Strict justice, but he had put it upon the ground of generosity and of liberality. It was very- easy for them to vote sway the money of • their constituents—(Hear.) —He - had seen many such. • nstancesollibcrality, but he hid hoped that no new 'onei would, baye•bean..brought. forward. When .the present Administration was first formed, he certainly' bad but very little confidence in it, but*, conduct had 'greatly raised his expectations; 'and notwithstanding their bringing forward of. the, measure before the C6in ' miuee, he still hoped the country would receive much. benefit from-its exertions. He indeed looked upon the measure brought forward by the Right Hon.Gentlernan, as one of compromise, and that might be a very good reason for its adoption by. the Ministers, but it was no reason why it should be adopted by the House—(Hear) —and he believed thin- by opposing it, he best consulted the dictates of common sense, and the imerests of the country. He admired the conduct-of Mr. Canning during the latter part of his life—he alluded pastictilarly to the foreign policy he pursued, and the part liettluk upon commercial questions; but to Mr. Camisoles, public conduct during the greater part of his life, he was opposed. It was painful for him to trouble the Housed it all upon the subject, but he felt it to be , his duty to. do so. He denied that under the - circumstance in which the country, was placed, that House would be justified in making the provision for Mr. Canning 'S family that was sought for.- - • Mr. STRATFORD CANNING said, that from the , ties by which he was bound to the late Mr. Canning, it Was but natural that tbe•very mention of use subject before the House should excite - in his bosom very pain ful sensations; and the difficulty he felt in expressing himself was not a little increased from his being a mem ber of that Assembly which had to decide upon its merits. He therefore hoped for the indulgence of the House—(Hear, hear),—and he would endeavour to con fine himself to as few words as possible.. The Noble Lord, in objecting -to the proposition,, had told the House that he understood it was brought forward upon the grounds of generosity and liberality, but that had it been put upon the ground of juSrice,, he should equally have been opposed to it; arid he should have been so in consequence of the state, of, the country. The force of that objection was, that. whatever might be the merits of a public man, boa ever brilliant and beneficial to the country his services might be, still the country was in so reduc, d, so isnimeerished, so Ismenta, 4k, so desperate a state, that the peltty.sum of SAO. a year fur a single life was of so much consequence a, to set aside not merely every feeling of generosity and of liberality, but to overthrow emir* jir,stice itselt— hear). He did not envy the Noble Lard the ere. ditut making such an estimate of the condition of the Country. But what might. be the mischief if such a Statement was sanctioned by the vote of that .House,. oottsviss carried ioto - foreign countries, or eyes if it was Iy, promulgated at home ?—(Hear, hear, hear.), But the Noble Lord did not rest his objection to the proposition merely upon the - state Of the cottetry. Whitt he spdke of, theriblic .Itfe, Of: Mr. CanOiOgS. 4l 9 1 . 9014 reasou for ,opposition to the. motion. Yet whatever 'bight be the °plait:ill of Mr. Canning's early nitrites, thin could have nothing,to cl 9 with the quotion hciosee .the goose. It was as a tecoMpense for the exertions made by. Mr. Canning during the latter part of hit lice that the motion was made. The period- to to,Consideted. Was from the time when' he sacrificed hl r s,lppointment to India. Tnat appotiumeiti was given to make up for a. life of Jail: But whatever might be the opinion en tertained of Mr. Canning's services, he could not believe that the House would adopt the principle laid down by the Noble Lord. .4Neti Ile irs's not a little astonished that any objections shout have fallen - from the Noble Lord as to the latter part of Mr. Canning's life, for the Noble Lord himself had come down to that House, and expressed his confidence in and approval of Mr. Can uing's Administration—(Cries of " No, no?) He might air in the particulars of the Noble Lord's conduct, but he believed he was substantially . correct. He believed that the Noble Lord led on some occasion or other ex pressed his readiness to support the policy adopted by Mr. Canning. He, therefore* Wits justifierVio expressing his surprise at the quarter ,frons. which .the opposition had proceeded. - It he looked at the position in which Mr. Canning had left the country, he _found reason to think that - the proposition' agi not improper. He would, not go into any detail. was . sufficient for him tit, ,mention to the recollection of. the House the services of `Mr. Canning; and if lwoletwiiho reedy tyrapathy in i thefaelings of the ffeetedik _43,14#41144 14n .re4o.-.-f Although he could poi ijopttt Anat.the Noble daft would remove or modify hivispposition, , Isis 'united that the general sentiment of the H 0044 Would be such at to show that there were few, if any, who concurred with the Noble Lord in the view• he hartel,a of the sub , jest—(hear.) t- . been Lo mistakeni dAL ' H a O s -t ß o P h e i i s pctisp4eut duringTli e 1.1 Ilan. eMI last b p l e h i s l i d . Ment. • He had not stated his approbation of the Govern ment of Mr. Canning ; he - bad merely ach ted a h le ia G im ov p ern res : m sio e n n , , that of fhtaheeethewoenpfaeortmie;d s o.uhteohf awdbsti Ilthich Mr. Canning was the head.. . • . preferred that of g th iv at e t a hi s s ii su eu bjec yo t t z Lord MILTON said—l feel , one eand on h w o p h e i c for r I t c h a e nn it o id t ü b lg e e i n a c ti e sfi o e f dSi t tr h o' e Mouse fora few 'minutes. I confess that feel myself placed in a situar don of sonic difficulty— . a difficulty not *little increased by the course which the Noble Lord has thought proper i to pursue. In the first place, I acknowledge that the case brought before us is not one of those dear and in dubitable propositions, ake u p his ma id but in.orie way. - It ix, Sir , a in which it is impossible for a questiou.on which we shall be more d ivi d ed b y feelin g than by reason.. I entirely agree (continued the Noble Lord) with s my Noble friend, as to the great financial difficuittes in which the country is involved—and if I could go further with him, and, say, that they are so great as to prevent the Houseirom taking into consideration even for a moment-any proposition such- as that of the Right Hon. the Chancellor (of the Exchequer, '1 should admit that then we should be saved from the difficulties et further toosideratiort. .40great,as those difficulties are, itdoes not appear to me that they ate so absolute and so pressing as to prevent this House from taking into consideration such &proposition as that which has heeu submitted to us by the Right lion. GentlemOr supposing that there were grounds for it.—l am not about tu enter upon any ' history of the life of - Mr. Can oiag—t-still less am I about to enter into the history of the whole of that life. lint I must , contede that I could not have sat for so many years in this House, in com-, spany,,as I.may soy, with Mr, Canning,. without having, .sn ipany occasions, differed from-.him, and therefore, ,undoubtedly, I must admit, that there may be many grounds on -which I might say the vote proposed might. .be, opposed.. But I will ask the. House, is there,any man, jiving or,de.d, whose life is or .has been of an unshed character,?—(Cheers). Is there any man, the stou te st pasiisan, or the boldest opponent of any political lear, who can get up in,thi, liou.e and declare, that the cdn duct of such leader was free from 'all reproach on the oue band or on the other—that the conduct of the per son to whom be was opposed had b en so bad.= to merit unqualified, unmitigated opposition? (Rear). It appears to ire,- thereforr, that the life of every man is of a mixed character—and, admitting that proposition, let us trans post oursekeii some ages downward, and see, if we can, what history 'will say of Mr,' Canning. in doing this, we must not look so much to the early stages of Mr. Capron:: life, when hi leagued himself with ()tha t young men, of otiose principles I cannot approve.; bnt let - us lool*to that first stage of his politicallife, whek his own opinions were firmed and enforced; and *bee he wait called titian to govern and to act. It s ii impos-; "Sible tei look upon the history of this country'iiiice Mr. Canning was called into power (or rather that 'which is called power, for 'place does not ilvrayi Constitute poster), and not to see what were the refill* of ex-, ercise of his vigorous mind upon Pepular'Goveritmentei in all quarters of the universe—(Cheers).. Future his- : tory will be called upon to support the statement, thet the world at large has been greatly indebted kliati-"-. (Cheenj. If then that be the case, not merely' the peo-. 'pie of &gland;ricit merely tltie people of Europe, bit the, whole . o*nlation l eifthe globe keg% even in Its most re mote quarters, hatie been operated upon beneficially, by the measures which Mr: Canning ''submitted to the Go vernment of England—(Henr).-4 'should conse4tientlyt be acting unworthy of myself if, upona confined view of Mr. Cannines s eoridoet in his political - ea - life % I should be influenced in the vote I am now called upon to giie.i Under these circumstances, although I cannot say that this is one of, those clear cases .on which it is impossible to entertain doubt, and giving to it the best consider& tion in my power, I am inclined to think that the House. of Commons will reap, in the opinion of posterity, more. honour by the vote which has been proposed, than by' opposing it—(Hear, hear, hear)—and, influenced bu those feelings, although I do .not feel that certitude which every man would wish to entertain, on every. operation ot life, I consider myself bound to support the proposition now before the committee—(Cheers). Lord MORPETH said, that as he bad been the per son who first introduced the subject embodied in the proposition before the Committee, be might.perhaps be excused should he offer respecting it a few observations; and he should set out with confessing that it was impos siole tor him not to concur in the preposition of the Right Hun. Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exche quer), and in most of what had fallen from his Noble. Friend who had just sat down. In attempting to call. the attention ot that House originally to the subject, he had felt that there were many Hon. Members much mote competent to such a task than himself. He had felt also that it was of the utmost importance - 0 interest in his object other parties who had since, happily, taken it up ; tipd with that siew he had named for the considera tion of his intended proposition a distant day, in order to afford en opportunity 'tor his Majesty'i Government to adopt it. With the se.ult he felt satisfied; he was fully Content that the responsibility and the authorship of the measure should be transferred to those who naturally possessed the greatest share of respect and authority within those walls. He begged leave, however,dis , tinctly to avow, that in his opinion the proposition of the Right Hon. Gentleman was hardly adequate to its professed object—Ahat it was hardly adequate to meet the exigencies of the living, or to record in a worthy manner the. sympathy, the regard, and the respect of a great nation. The reason which had principally in fluenced him in that course was, that upon all such occasions it was important to secure all possible una• niiiity of opinion—(Hear, hear.) The Right Honour able Gentleman opposite bad said, and he (Lord. Morpeth) had heard it with satisfactiOn,. that there did not exist on his part, in the tied; which heir(); posed, any intention of placing the merits -of Mr-. Canning on a level with the claims of any person! merely plodding through the duties of an official situ.: ation. Thelsroposed 'Vote had not been put forward as an appendage to the Peerage % and be (Lord M.) was' glad of it, fot i if id, it might form an objectionable preo cedent, and brie the effect 'of inducing future M'i liters to of the Crown touter Peerages with if* : .* Jo I the instances of l .Lord Chatham and sr. PCTIP .;the. provision made exceeded that proposed in the vote en, der consineraiiOn; yet be considered the merit. of - the inditiduat here referred to were in no wise interior'to` -those of the individuals he had mentioned. Neverther r 'k l is the family and the connections of Mr. Canning • • • would receive with gratitude that Which Parliament might bestow, as a recognition of theteleitts,andof thW not claims on the country, or that lamented Slates . i kV! lartleated that the proposition-had encountered: eks approbation Of his Noble Friend (Lord' Altharp).l • The pecuniary lossincurred by the family ontat4itling by 'his lamenteddeath was great. Even the funeral eXpenses (which were borne by them), were very considerable. I The only mode left open to that Home to erpress gratitude to the illustrious deceased was therefore by i s creasing the comforts of those he had left behind. 01 4 11 the'pbjections that could be taken to such mes , ll founded upon economy was the most unt, mamma, avory grateful_ actioth_miKht be. similar . objection—economy. 'Pre - cosill himself to think that any Measure calculat late to 'diiintereitedness was economy—(C he would ask, could any measure be likely to stimulate public functionaries to tuq in the public service, than the protection viving members of their families ?—(Her Was very-farfrom saying, that the extent tained by individuals was of course to be the country ; but when the fortune of a had been injured in the public service.. it denied that reparation became a duty of Those who best knew Mr. Canning were ~ the unostentatious mode of his life; yet the of his public situation by no means let' beyond his necessary expenditure. The held during the last few years • f his Leader of the House of Commons, and tory, unavoidably involved him in corhiclei by the constant and liberal exercise of this he should refer to one instant's; : it lected that when, through his policy, the South America had been called into exit from them respectisoly were deputed to there was tp be s!etVfor the first time, Mr. Cannink, the Representoires of Coh aqd Buenos Ayres, with Miinisters of Hapsburg, Bourbon, and Braoanza-4 In dealing with the proposition before he would iMplore of Honourable Member. Mr. Canning himself did the grant for if Mr. Pitt's debts; namely, he would say, given as a vote of eleemosynary charity, dictated by poithumous pity or compas politic debt due to a great public man—(t naturally , brought him (Lord Morpeth) anon of the question, did or did not this Mr. Canning• a debt Of gratitude?—H , LorChto4 a renew of the public life of of his conduct respe:tiiig the Stave Tray Question, the • Corn Laws, the Foreigt Country, and every other great question day, contending that on every one of , H nourab:e Gentleman had merited the his country. ' Sir ROBERT WILSON declared the man more deeply impressed than himsel of a frugal expenditure of the public money same time, be thought there might be - generosity creditable to the character, advantageous to the interests, of "the was no,plan who would • say that those distinctions ought to be confined to per done service to the country in the arr rtio , should be extended to all. whose tended to.promote the welfare of the State. tion then was, had Mr. Canning such -' mark of public gratitude ? There were, ' Several 'satiates in the life of Mr. Canning 'SCptionssmight be taken, certain errors thelong -life of a Statesman; but. when remembered the services Mr. Canning country,. and the public lamentation England, Europe, and America, on his rememberedthat the talent of Fraoce recording the sympathy of the Continent of England—and when he remembered nefits Mr. Canning's policy conferred civil and religious libertp—he felt hi give hii support to the preset`it vote, was sure would be satisfactory to his the country generally. Sir M. W. RIDLEY never rose wit than he felt op the presentoccasioo, to in involving the personal merits of a disti vidual ' • but he was anxious to - state. which Ire conclirred with,. (his Noble " not oppose the grant -on the score of would object to Si)01, as much as vote-of SNOW. Wit, though he 'hoped potion; which Ile 'apprehended from measures relative to Greece .and Poril be realized,- yet, on the ground of sores, be would give'his'negative to the He admired as much' as any man the bi the dazzling eloquence of Mr: Canning to see that those brilliant talents often It away to measures injurious to the count of his intellectual accomplishments was reason to induce him to vote for the g' however, to Mr. canning, be regretted gave him on the motion of the late ham; but he could not think that he ration for his conduct on that occasiot the motion of this night. He could with his principles and his sense of ch always opposed to Mr. Canning's course for the proposed grant. ' Lord CLIFTON, being one of throe declared their • confidence Kr. Cat and measures, could not now hesitate giving hissupport to the motion: • Mr. HUME was anxious to offer a fee he was fearful that the House bad been the real merits of the question by the. appeals to the feelings., He .was desirous duct of the House should be in accordance oil mon sense and the real interests of the country. spect to its mere amount, theproposed grant w: pooch consequence; but in principle it was highly jectionable. He wished public services to be prop''' remunerated; but if the motion was agreed ' public servant was there who would not have a to the consideration of that House ? Mr. CAniiing. not like a Wellington. He bad never so distingui 'himself as to call for a peculiar mink of nation al titude And admiration. He concurred in the . eulogies which had been passed on Mr. Canning' (mace, but he had too often occasion to c , ndemn use made of that ekquence. He cuntendeJ that (Me of those around him would have su is position if it h,ad been brought forward yea With what consistency they could do o now it via' them to . explain. • In giving up the appointment India Mr. Canning bad consulted his own doily. gr. Canning had one feeling stronger titan ARROW, • 'Wks, am bition. , himself had said so, and it " • s indolgethatfeelang that he gave up his appoint': Indtkifhereht 'might have amassed an iniMen'el tufle; Me. Canning saw the opening for his 40"• pported the l'APc_OineOf lis t poWer, and he availed himself or it. (maintained that the public conduct of Mr. Cannii not entitle him to the proposition brought forwar d liilo ll ttkit irf the Noble Lord (Althorp) as to no l'et at Abe 04134 y had not.yet been answered —no, n et, *ln-Canning had not .filled any situatic which he had not beerefully rewarded for his - The Noble Lord (Morpeth) had said that the fool Mr. Canning did not solicit the grant ou the sr *l , l_ 1 LT never : I u tto t h a ez te e d to stirn i ; k at sl -(Cheers)— a m :( adopted mot, A etion of the sut I if that net q "etetnhe u . mad e ailoo i bat t uf e l l Het dl.dW.nsPE; tse:nb: et it 1; t c l i f d e t r h a e b a t might ,/' slt a superfluity it e places he 14,1 (' s life — nint h, C I Foreign Sec " b ie. l i e n se tis i i g i ! of hospitality. e o this Court, and in : ui -Here r)1 1, 'lbt a i Hh (T s Y n s: c s el la s hti a 'l c n o mi s t a te et ee o i see u lfi gr o o . beat ute w n tcP n rC i h il t: o nt e t : , :a erat 'S'iiabm yrt s tr i b ht'':v leeeEey.aautaml:dltitaraentoti was c s ng'irriv' wi tst l ) a eti a i n t°t' o cl e el s s t i lY b e .b :e s,") e • . 4 . : 1 6 : 11113 liociut la 1 1 1 4. to at —(Cheersj. L i )to the considei. .: of Mr. Cannith : , raJe, the Bullion a gn Policy of the Is he approbation o f e pelf:4 I , . 0 t : eal such l 31 n ewe d mYi t 4 a ht ahbt l he i ut remunerative b liberality Ri ' van i L b e i t I as ek ty ' , : 111 ti l li t , : e se r. , w e h yl o in h o ad e t s r h m ta y ctela. and imTsh n eio av i y at . ,,4 _ , 7 : 111 :es,ihliesewpoarualbdiesdfimosit; Id n p i e n r g f o t r o m w e h d i e t !: e il t s .. ' mA s den he (Sir It. W 4 fa. ins that pervaded i is death—when an e was employed' t h i ant with the regret thi ered . the many . i xi on the cause ,r, himself bound is A. vote which is constituents a .1 with Ereater . pai i o oppose a motion lc distinguished indi• . 4 tte.the reasons ! Friend. ' , lie di 01 I its amount. 11. hi ito the propose. „ ed that the anti .. a d MS Mr. Canning „ ortugal' would . 4 if these too me the present mots , 01 . briliant talents ar, ig; but he'regrette . 04 1 led the Hon. Ge ! iss untry. The qualit 1 cir was not a suffici grant. In instic • i , ed the opposition , oi ion by supponing ! c Member oul could make for re D u . ' ' 1 d not coosituci ' duty i 'which ..t urse of policy, of I ate one momenta or );ennwinhgo'slapstriSticsip4lts is few words, beasts keen led away O n Iv the eloquence ssd 7 'irons that th ew" 0 :ordance with CO w be country. la'" .‘ a ied grant was oar .e le it was highly 01 ' i vices to be plar el Y .. t Mr. Canning w • 1 ver so distinguishe ,c rk of national g" irc :weed in the b i g .et 1 as not ag r e h e a d v have i a ii :1; 4: i Mr. Canning's el' i ni sion to c , ndemn 0 . t contended that n. _ e supported the pr .7 1 ward sis years ag , d o n o now it was i l i the appointment 1 his own desire. o ger than another, and it was it ng for his . ~.n , i of Mr. CalltilPg: a i l sought forward , horp) as to t;e S t wered—nos 005 e)(id his s a o n , a P i o P it n e t 7,e e n f t o' ', a :eddhialinisyelsi ;t o u t a il o ll 'Jed for his set' , id that the fonill . ant 011 the stotOd illiaeo em o lume ntsn d v .- Pr