Star. — London, England, 1825-05-11 00:00:00

- ;-~ ; • land had of late created, the disposition shewn to favou r it by a Right.Hnnourable - Gentlemits (the ChailMilor of the Exchequer) in those measures immediately within his province —the better knowledge of the sufferings and the character of the people, all tended to advattce the cause. Ile hid no doubt of the ultimate success of the measure, bast 44 put it to those who were at preseat opposed wit to paisW immods. bow mach better it would be tst. give that at *am as a bow .stbidi must soon be yielded us a rigbt --as make that which egg ladOtinibie after a time detiginfal and acceptable by Ay frveibnallad genereeity of at once bestowing it to the people of Ireland!—(Loud cheers). The SOLJC.IIOII.-GENERAL should not trouble the House a. much length, 'bet would beg to allude to a few points .of that evidence which had, wrought a conversion on some Honourable Members; and par ticularly on the I:honorable Member for Armagh, who formerly held - opposite opinions to those he now iuslds.. From that evidence he (the Solicitor-Generall 'drew exactly a contrary conclu ion. Before the Com- Isamu of both Houses, Dr. Doyle said he had no in tention to attack the property of the Pr.testant Church, and reciudiated the imputation; Far be it from him , (the Solicitor.Geaer4) to impugn the character of that Prelate, but when as an author he found him to 'contradict himself, be could not as a witness believe him. The Honourable and Learned _Gentleman pro. ceeded to argue, that the-sentiments in the letters •of J. K. 1.. were inconsistent with those before the Com mittees. A more unconstitutional measure than that for the disfranchisement of the forty shilling free holders never pass.sd that House. The object of the measure, including the two wings as they were called. was said to 'be - to conciliate Ireland ; and Aar this purpose the patrician and equesu ian orders were to be eman cipated, and the mass of, the people were to lose 'the '' , privileges which they already possessed. It was. an outrage upon human nature to say that the people of Ireland could be content to be thus stripped of the power they held under the Constitution. He would put it to the Honourable Bainnet; the Member for Westminster, who was the author of this scheme, how such a mode of legislation would be relished in West minster ? What would his conititnents say, —what would he say himself to a Bill introduced to disfran. chile the tinker, the tailor, the blacksmith, and, hoc genus mime, the chimney-sweeper, who lived is the alley, in favour of the more opulent shopkeeper ? (Hear, hear). Yet this was the description of the - Bill which was to pour Samatitattoil ietp the . wounds o( Ireland. Much as be objetted.torthe measure for. ilta. Emancipation of the Catholic*, he objected still •moke to this proposition for the spoliation lind destruction of the lower orders oilrelsaid. peminded: bins libasft i ' thing of the fatuous trentford. pill). of 'Which • the FlOnoareble Baronet might haveheard ; which.ected. as a sort of splitting or dividing 'machine, to turn +Ol. into 4001. in the manufacture of votes. • Atte the perjuty of the bintaltsed and barbsi:eci people*of Ire land, as they were called, which was made she : ground of the Disfranchiserrient Bill, it could .not but appear odd enough that Honourable. Members oppOsite made io proposition to remove this till ,the appearance of the'Emancipation Bill. He could call that, Bill nothing less than, is the words of Dr. Doyle, 'magnum Intro ciaima—a great robbery upon the people of Ireland. He would suppose a dialogue between . some of the lower orders of Ireland and Mr. O'Connell upon his return Well, what have you got ?—A: I have got a silk gown, and the chance of being Solicitor- General or Attorney-General, and also a chance of the Bench. Q. And the Duke of Norfolk, what has he got ?—A. He has got the right to sit in Parlia ment? Q What have we got?--A. Youl you have got well robbed I—(ii laugh )i He contended that it was a most grossly uecookitutiooal fraud—a more unconstitutional measure never since the Charters for feited by Charles IL. had been known in that House.— The Resolution of the Noble Lord (Lord L. Gower) was calculated to introduce into this couotry a Papal Church. Was lie aware that that Church considered marriage, •bainistn,, and sepulture as spiritual rights, which might be given or withheld at the pleasure of the Church? They bad also the power of divorcing, not indeed a vineuto matrimonii, but a mensa et thorn s and the Noble Lord propoSed to legitimatise a Church exercising poWers contrary to the law of the land in this country. The Catholic Bishop. in every State in Europe, took an oath to observe the regalities and civil power of the State.. But such an oath was refused in this country; and it was propesed by this Bill to esta blish an irresponsible Church, which existed nowhere else is Europe. As to the securities, as they Were ‘cal i led, he, challenged his Hon. aud Learned Friend (Mr. Brougham) for his opinion upon them. • If it were proposed to set up pasdes to guard against any mal- Tersaticia of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, would they appoint four Lords of the Treasury for that pur vose? Yet, here was a precisely similar proposal to appoint Catholic Bishops to guard against any intrigrie with the Pope. .In short, the question of security in such a form was not to be gravely argueribi any one; it could only. be treated with ridicule, not being worthy of the waste of the powder and shot of argument. The pope was to be watched, and he was to Appoint his own guardians. Mr. Grattan, a man great in virtue and legislation, was guilty of no such absurdity as propos :mg a,pperile system of inspection of. this kind, the inspection of all documents which was denied to tbe inhallOsied eYeS • Of laymen ' was freely permitted fo the House of Bourbon and denied tothe House of Bruniwick. Wherefore. was:his ? It was declared that the people of thii. cOueny . were in favour ofthin measure. He had taken some pains, to ascertain how this matter stood, and:beloved that of the petitions presented upon ;be subject 263 were against the Bill, and 54 in its favour. This he thritight Was petty strong testimony of the sense of the country 'Too the question. Of the 253, sixty only *ere tlerleal Petitions. Upon a full review of the subject, ha mac solemnly declare to the HOuse, that he could not follow the. respectable example of the Hon. Member for Armagh (Mr. Brownlow). He stated this is the' result of* TaboriOus consideration and re , consideration of the 411 ; . tiiina* *, So help me GOO," aitid and beamed Gentleman; " I 4inic should forfeit every -pretension to priotiple, and to the character of a tiontioitionsal -1.4 w ler" . if I supported trill to strip the lower orders for,thE purpose of infest, ing the higher ordees; • to abrogate OesPOzersalkaff 4 * regains of -the Crown by. in OCCIeSi4StiCal plats six . millions of-ther , Hiug's subjects in a state of triec i ted slavery—i Cries of' • Nth no';), Let the How then get . - op and Asti iAat else is the power'exertiiedfs thiiiiirlest to exetimmoilnite thi subjects of the Crown? uplas the *Aide, Sr, feel' it - to beiny - boauderitlut7 to movie,- *eV inneirameat tollie original Modem • • That this ßill be read a timr this tkrisla months'"—..(Chenly:•• • • The Amendment havinatimen Tut from the Chair, Mr. BOSICLIOSMaimght, 'Oat tine aeguiliz4. no toil Much upon the nation -of ebutithliing .1 41 kr .VJ •• ALii to.* V , •... , r • '. .- ~:_. .1.,... , 111... , ..... , 0 -T -- - - - - ' tolerating one a hick was established. With their spi ritual tenets; and doctrineshe had nothing to do. In the practices and in t e n tions of the Itomish hierarchy he could see nothing to dread, were they Even wriikedly 'lnclined% He ovred'it ?slice to vote for the re-_, cfiil be oreveti enactment againn the Cutback or any' SXlrer body Miles who reittainedexpoted to pains and.' 'disabilities Lett after the evils 7.nd dangers anticipated by those enactments had-ceased. It was on this groond that the CittbOlks were entitled to his vote, to which his country had a heavier claim. To withhold their rights' was to keep Olive - divisions among them, to make the dangers increase—to retard the prosperity of the coun try in thole' of peace—to reader that peace less durable —to' make the difficulties of the country more injurious, should war considerably impair the resources—to die-' tract our energies when they ought to be combined against the common enelny. He considered the opposition to the adjuncts of the Bill'as of very little weight, because they came before the House rather as matter of detail. He considered all argument - on the principle as having been long ago set at rest for ever. The practical view (1 it was with respect to Ireland., Apart from Ireland, however cogent the arguments and claims of the Ro man Catholics and their advocates, they were in that comparison unimportant. In Ireland they had to con. tend with all the evils of a divided establishment. The Government of this country had. at a former period, imported thither the Protestant religion. The transfer of the Church property to the Ministers of the reformed religion was not accompanied with the transfer of the religious telief of the inhabitants. 'Still the Act of Union, following in the stream of time, confirmed that property in the religion of the State, and it was now irrecoverable.' This was wisely done—because to shake the inviolability of the Church property, or that of any other kind, was to affect the stability of all property, and thereby subvert the foundations of all civil order and good government. With an evil of this portentous size gill growing up among them, they ought to think of a remedy. It was a good old didunt of that House that there was no evil beyond the reach of Parliament— that there was no great political evil for which Parlia-^ meat was not. bound, as it was very well able, to pro vide a remedy. Something num be done,. and what was that something to be? Could they hope to con vert the Roman Catholics? The speculation was idle, and too frivolous to discuss. . petides, the chances even of individual exertion were lowered, while they laboured among a people barred from open and unqua lified intercourse by pains, restrictions, and disabilities., He trusted much to the diffusion of wealth and intelli gence among the Irish, and the successful ambition of many of that religion, who bad taken to the learned professions, - for producing a community of sentiment and feeling. He looked with no less gratification to the support given to this Bill by the Protestants of this country, by the majority of this House, and a large proportion of the other. Bat could they suppose that the Catholics were not also conscious of this support? ' and must they not expect that the Catholics would never cease in their attempts until they had acquired their rights . That 'hot e' was still more visionary than the idea of converting them. What then was there left to do ? Remove the causes of dicontent, by providing for the safety of Ireland. He assumed that there must be some danger in altering the system of law which had for so long a time excluded them s but whether it was at pre.ent inconsiderable, or whether it was really appalling, as it had been represented, now was the best time to deal with it. Th!s was the true view of the subject, which toil in the comparison of dangers., The gallant Member for Westmeath, who knew the value of 10.000 additional troops in preserving the peace of Ireland, and from his professional habits was not likely to be too easily alarmed, was of opinion that Ca tholic Emancipation would do more to tranquillize Ire -lAd than 10,000 additional force. By far the greater loss which the country experienced in consequence of these restrictions on the Roman Catholics was occa sioned—and this was - a fact which 'Gentlemen who were accostomed to discuss questions of political economy would do well particularly to consider—by the loss of all the benefit that might, under other circumstances, be derived from the employment of millions of English Capital in Ireland (Hear), which must now be considered as so many millions diverted and withdrawn from all those channels of industry and improvement which they might have so beneficially opened or enlarged.— He should have been One of those who unquestionably would have rejoiced had the measure of Catholic Eman eirition been granted , at the time of voting the Union of the two countries--'Hear, henry But whatever had subsequently to the Union 'fie& the misfortunes and troubles of Ireland, it quad not be denied that she had , een, in the same period, going as increasing in wealth, and power, and in intelligent and educated classes. There were, in fine, a great many more existing circum stances now, than there were five-and-twenty years ago, to enable Ireland to receive the boonshe now claimed' with advantage to herself; end the danger at with holding that boon, on :the Other hand, was proportion ably increased, comp** With what the danger of doing so would have been it a period Sib years back.-- The Catholics came before -Parliainest 'AS• supplicants. for admission to a participation of all thole civil rights and privileges which were enjoyed ht. itit other classes of the King's subjects; and in - this their supplication they were backed by it large portion at the intelligence and influence of the Protestant. community, both' in England and Ireland...;.Tt „War this very circumstance of their being so supported that made fuFtlar 40 11 .1. 0 f, these claims highly dangerous. Thisreawmieihite be some Honourable Gentletten who supposed =dud the , Roman Catholic's perpetual meditation—his dream by `,night and his anxiety by day —was how be inighf meet 'effectually plan the.overthrow of th e Protestant *GUI.' blishment as it now existed. Now, what stris it that the Roman Catholics were at this moment asking? TO be admitted *within the pale of a Protestant f`ioliiic4ll 6 4 ', ciety. Could it, then; be imagined, that the riaotitenS - they should succeed in-getting within it, their exertion:l would be turned to the destruction of dist:heftier' Which' they bad so strenuously exerted themselves to' attain? . But suppose the fears of Honourable Gentlemen; shotaa unfortunately ever -• be• verified, las- he heartily . he fleved *they never Could or' 2 ineuldbe setsuppese that the !Oman Catlidics stf hristsle has? dons, could it be doubted' what course 'we should` called no to pursue? Would therany longer:stand:in the' viruatida of stipplicantif for 'tights; in that situation i 4 iihich now constituted the meal suength bf their' NO; 4Heer, loan) but they *Quid 'i:tindl 3 . l rise situation of aggressors —iskaggtessoniugainst Ibsen!! rOh:of the Stahelth e , toaninttiou4klbe agairite./itinfi ti.lffiktimentthat , fortnA4ilet luard and sea 'r- icy; and Minified die basis 40s 400)1 ( Hear). Unless, slialnioMthf Route could suppose itelt.o l lllll YCi Lifitte;k_oe . e frlftOis ts!! 1 . 11 V.:at a . . .0 01141 •:ta; a ir of the most wicked people in the world, it could not enter ,tain fears of this description.. Yet.. if loch fataLte `suit should % ,ever, forked, tike place, he was, on The present occasion, _prepared to say, that he, for one, would go the Tuft length of re-enacting the whole Penal Code against the Catholics—(Hear, hear, hear) a code, however, of which he must say he could not see the necessitl of Many of its enactments, whit') rather, In truth, were calculated to excite that irritation. in Ire land that was.ever most likely to occasion discontents which it was sought to repress. His Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Peel) had in imated that he thought some con cessions ought to be made to the Roman Catholics. I The Right Hon. Gent. was not, therefore, one of those opponents who thought that civil exclusions existing now ought to exist for ever. The Right Hon. Gentle man's objec , ions were onderstood to be to their admis sion to the Batch, the Privy 'Council, and seats in Par ' liament—(Hear). The chief ground of these objec tions was, that -a Roman Catholic would be a dangerous adviser in the councils of a Protestant King. He (Mr. Huskisson) could not' apprehend 1 that .a Roman Catholic, as such, could be thus dan gerous in such a situation ; for Wile could bring himself to plan the removal of the Protestant King recognised by the Constitution, or even the downf Ai of the Protestant Church, of which that King was the recognised head, he mu,t have previously made such a sacrifice of his judgment and his perception to his pasinn and his zeal —he must be a bigot of sb prostrated a mind as had never before, he (Mr. Huskisson) would venture to say, aspired to power. But, let his talents, or the influence of his ability be ever so great, let it be observed, they would always be to be measured by the eloquence, abi lity, and wisdom contained in that House—.-(Hear). He warned the Honie, and he desired to do so again and I again, that if they did not at once proceed to do away with these unjust restrictions, arid to repress these childish and unfounded prejudices, they would have, over and over again, to deal with assemblies in Ireland of as formidalge a, description• as the late Catholic Associatiou—(Hear, hear). Sorry he was to trespass so largely on the patience of the House; but this was the first, and he trusted it would now be the last opportunity—(Cheers), that had presented itself to him for the delivery of his sentiments on the principle of this Bill. The Hon. Member for Durham had rather re- fleeted upon the improper way in which he conceived that these two Bills, which he called the two wings, had been treated and prepared in the preliminary stages of their progress, prior to their being brought up before the House. But he now begged to state, on the part both of himself and of his Hon. Friend the Secre tary of State for Foreign Affairs (Mr. Canning),*whose absence on such an occasion as this, particularly on account of its cause, the House must deeply regret (Hear, hear)—that neither of them bad been present at any of those previous discussions of the two mea sures ; and he was authorised to say, that his Right Hon. Friend knew nothing of either of the Bills in question, till the notice of the Hon. Member for Staffird, (Mr. Littleton) of the Elective Franchise. Bill, and the notice of the Noble Lord (Lemon Gower) in respect of the other, first brought them both to the knowledge of his Right Hon. Friend. For his part, be believed that both Bills were intended to aid and accelerate the measure of Catholic emancipation. As to the Bill for disfranchising the 40s. freeholders, he could not quite say that . be altogether approved of its principle. In voting for the other, he had intended to give it his sanction only up to this point and to this extent—that as this House hold the public purse, and was bound to' provide for the expenses of the public service, so he should hold it was to provide for the effectual opera tion and results of a measure which, by granting Citholic emancipation, would bicalculated to prodice such incalculable benefit to the community over which the parties in qiestion might fairly be supposed to exercise so extensive an influence.. But when his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Peel) talked. about the making pro vision for a regular establishaient for Archbishops and Bishops, and an inferior Clergy, as a concomitant to the Bill for Roman Catholic emancipa:ion, he (Mr. Hut kisson) begged to say he contemplated no sucho w ould whatever He thought, indeed, that it w re quire much previous inquiry and consideration. before they could proceed to make any provision for the Ca tholic clergy by law. And he should be unwilling (as far as he could judge now upon a subject so compli cated and difficult, and mixed up with many other con siderations that would be fully gone into before any de finitive plan was acted upon), to place that provision, whatever it might be, beyond the matroul of Gov ; in the same manner as was observed towards the Protestant ten and other separatists from the Church of England. To , the Bill itself now before the House, be gave his most cordial support. Mr. Secretary PEEL was sure the House would allow him to advert to something which had fallen in the course of the debate on Friday night last, from the Honourable Member for Winchelsea, out of regard to the situation ,and the feelings of the writer of a let. ter which he held in his band, now the widow of the late Dr. O'Byrne, the Bishop of Meath, whose name And been alluded to particularly on Friday night... — Ibis Lady desired him (Mr. Peel) to state distinctly, that the Bishop, bet late husband, never was an admit bed member df the Church of Rome. He bad been rought up as a Roman Catholic, and . eo continued bntil he was about 90 years of age; when, seeing reason to enter the Protestant Church, be sent to Cambridge. At that University, Dr. Watson was his tutor, and be was ordained, for the fi rst time (Hear), Deacon of the Protestant Established Church, and home little time subseqdattly, a/dinister of the Church of England. • Hailing' set this matter right, he (Mr. reel).. would prikeeirto observe, that he felt nth that be had elreadY tiered every Oppositi.m to phis asossure, which be could offer consistently with kj~rinciphis on which his objections to it were founded. itleated,..thetifOre,e, useless for him to detain View Mt ' `the ptesent occasion, nor did he think *necessary to do so, with the view of bringing for larsfiti any novelties on this subject, which, on the con. tt ary l he was anablp to find. His opinions on this most momentous subject _were already on record— iirstr)- and it - would be merely trifling with that indulgence ;Inch the HAW had sheen towards him ott other occasions, if be tette to repeat now what he adiaacOd . US them before. He merely wished to take this oppostualy sit restating, that the opinions her lindlormirly bead' en this matter remained still iin• artited. "'phase alibied., were not precisely in (=foes isiifj *RN ahtisinhat fillen from • those who were hostile, like himself, to_the so ceral question of Catholic assaneipation r .for .he not concur with those 4111110 ibelight that no, further cougesdons whatever eos in to Ise.maile to the . Catholics, seeing thatiii had' madly and distinctly declared his . apprehension that atF •-all respects Use. Roman oslollo-,01 En land shOold ibtflet 4 , 1 4 1 0- 109 014 sk4tisl444—the •• " ' 34'1 . . J.: intimately y• religious feeling •Itair 'beeryetross.. r __ with all the great feuds recorded in anthistorfankl - ahsfi; of Scotland and Ireland —hole Mainly it had inti 'need • the two great eirents of the Refornestion and the Revel , nation, he could not brit feel, sensible, that.religfmn ater a deiire to promote i-, would always be a geese one• . rating cause of similar conduct—(Hear). When - he looked at the numbers of the Romer Cathcilicii and at the circumstances under which the tearisfer.of Chu-Ch ' property from theirs to Protestant hands text place at . the Revolution, he could not feet satisfied or convinced that it was either wise or expedieht to remove th Ise barriers which he thought much 'lretrer,calcnhited'ir protect dsc.Protestant ascendaley in this enantry thin those ecclesiaitical securities which it was rinw ills a is4 : to substitute in their stead. In one sense he t ,, , a,' did think that these Bills were. inconsistent. with , e , Constitution, but in regard to the nieasone ritn Ore a the House„he did tint rely on that objectioit:a„ iik. 4 In the other proposed Bills the clauses went ti it crate , those relations which 'the Constitution had esta,, blished between the Church and State, and the, rules . ' by which they were reciprocally governed and regtilated., His Hon. and Learned Friend (Mr. H. 'Nisi) bad Lead. to the House that evening some very valuable records; but really he wished that his Hon. and Learned Friend would refer to other parts of those records , and other authorities, that he had overlooked. ilk Hon. and Learned Friend, in the very outset of his speech, de clared he intended by it to prove that the exclusion of the Roman Catholics first passed into a law under the Act 30th of Charles ll.—an Act passed, Undoubtedly, at a time when the country was in a state 'of great fer ment; thit such exclusion entirely reposed on that statute originally, and on the penal statutes subse quently enacted in furtherance of the same object t but here he entirely differed from his Hon. and Learned Friend, because he would contend that the exclusion of the Roman Catholics was quite cdeval with ti e Retest mation-(Hear). He, begged to refer to the sth of Elisabeth, where it would be found that every Knight s Burgess, &c. before he could - sit in that H iuse., was obliged to take an oath, wh'ch, if his Hon. Fr iend would be content to administer; instead of the Test or Abjura tion Oath, he (Mr. Peel) would be satisfied—(l laugh). The Honourable and Learned Gentleman had also pointed 'out an Act which was passed in the reign of Edward VI. and had quoted the preamble, the language of which he considered to be very beautiful and int- . pressive, and which was to this effect: " But as in tem pest or storm one coirse vest is convenient; in better or milder weather a lighter and more liberal garment, both may and ought to be used," &c. Naw he (Mr. Pael) being anxious to ascertain what was the" light and li. bete - garment" used in the reign of Edward VI. in re. specs of these matters, had found, on perusing the Act, the preamble of which appeared so beautiful and im pressive to his Honourable Fri,;nd, that it was one under which, for the very speech that learned Gentleman had this very night delivered. he would have been put to death—(Leuginer, and cries of Hear). "If any person shall by any writieg, word, deed, or act, affirm, or set forth, or assert,"—in short should deny the King's suptensacy,then, " he and all his eiders, anettors, and ' comforters" (that would be the Honourable and Learned Member for Wootton Basset, and all the Gen: tlemen disposed to support' him) (Laughter) "ihould incur and suffer the - penalty of death,""&e. (Heer, keit). • A light and liberal vest, truly, his-.Honourable and - Learned Friend bad selected for his purpose.. Helble. • Peel) could only say that he required no suit laws; Oil this subject, as those of Edward VI. His appreliellrni sions of danger fronithe removal in any degree r.rtety, existing barriers against the Roman Catholic religienn and influence were in no degree weakened by the *OW to which the House had come-a-that it, was " fit end" expedient" to make provision for the Roman eathelidi ektgy. It was singular that his Right Hcatmenallii* Friend (Mr. Huskisson) should object to remove,' Ole' said, the provision in question from the controul of Par liament, as in the case of some bodies of Dissenters; because; if so, why bad his Right Honourable Priced concurred in the vote for its being " fit and expediewt to make provision by law r and in so far, a provision not under the immediate coupon' of Parliament ; for what else did his Right Honourable Friend, underst,od by 11 a provision by law?" He must in this place strongly contend, that if ever there was a creation which ought to be reserved for the execuliVe to dish with, it was the relation in which the Roman Cathigc . Clergy should stand with the Government—(.Hest). As to the establishment of that C.ergy be (3dr. terel) had certainly heard two propisitions asserted in tfitht House, of which one regarded a scale of aUoilie4it, such as 1.500,1. a-yeast for an Arcbbirhop,l.oolllkalear for a Bishop, 2001. a-year for a Priest,. ice. The other was in effect this—that the founds' for the pupating- of these allowances were not to be taken out of the pro duce of the taxes, but out of the resources . of ,the Church. Neither of these propositions or explina. tions was calculated to remove his (Mr. Peel's) objec tions to the proposed provision ; though he would not say but that it might be necessary hereafter to consider of the propriety of making souse sat or other of provision for this clam of persons. Toe evidence of Dr. Doyle went clearly to express an - un hesitating opin:on, that let the Pope state whatever he would in regard to the doctrine of the Church of Ire land, the Catholics were bound to acquiesce in the di rections of the Pope. On this account, again, he (Mr. Peel) was of opinion, that the vote of the when night was a most important one; and continued_ subsequent reflection had justified to his own mind the advice which be had ventured to give the House on that oc casion—that they should pause long'before they *agreed to such a vote. Without at all disguising from himself the difficulty of the two only alternatives which they wee told the House had to choose between ors the pre sent occasion, he thought there was yet another plan to be proposed, which ought, at least, toigs no dissatis faction to the. parties it applied to. lithe Legislature and the chief executive offices in the Protestant Go vernment, as settled by n f d al Rig hts, othe s w opere ele le l riialloydmwahnParCnoatethstaoalnicrlisirehliPtereicaonosheuticadomia'aseein of e litis t the im il : t i zr . rangement as one of injustice to them; ee ef_ ddstan d an at;o of n ;thnocs: i d n i v d idi h ou e s b d e i l s i t ev inc e tio tl a ta s t w it hig w i r ba ld a tend disitle , 'to had existence in Ireland, or thoseritritating peoceeilion that could not he'enestb-cendellanshiThat disiPasiint mat weei• Al I thts *Mit asswarlP *soda! edited** I ? bAigi s rr. a Semi. -.7 -nni,,q orit tannallia ~--.. yil tplvi '-3 :..- . :: ATI at ..St rr, arty; • T .sisoen distill lis .7, try ...,,i •; 1 .r.e.!^! i'.'(".• , ,:.,;-:.1 77 E ' 11!07413 5* • Legislature and the Chief executive offices of the St4te .shi;tolti._ sitehattl it esen cl)o- -fined 61 Taw, of doctrine Of the Chart% •=ait - *to save' in what manner religiotii .. 'send- al desire , , to:s support and ativince that religion, had infleiliced- sal the civil contests that hachalFeitt plate% this ttioritry—• time intimately reliviente terline—ltatit '7 4 'IF