Star. — London, England, 1828-03-03 00:00:00

LAW IN FELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, MARCH I. FKATT AND BARKER. Counsel were heard to conclude the argument in this appeal. The LORD CDANCELLOR then pryceeded to give' judgment: He recapitulated the main facts of the case, which have been already staled, and said, that this being the case of a voluntary settlement, it was the duty as it was the practice of the Court to lock with the greatest circumspection, and even with jealousy, at the facts that had attended the transaction. The evidence of Mr. Sperling, the attorney who had prepared the deed, was extremely important in its bearing upon those points which must chit fly influence the decision of the Court. He proved, th it the person making that set tlement, although a man advanced in years, was in the full possession of his faculties ; that he (the attorney) ha. explained to him the nature of the deed he was about to execute that it was an absolute transfer of his property, and not a disposition which he could after wards revoke, and that the settler being thus fully ap prised o f it s effect, executed the deed. So far the con duct of the attorney appeared not only to be blameless, but he had done all that his professional duty required o f him. His evidence also cast some light upon the conduct of Mr. Barker, one of the defendants, and a person entitled to a moiety of the residue of the settler's property. Mr. Barker, it appeared, had given the attorney instructions to prepare the deed in the form that Mr. Pratt had resolved upon ; but he told hint, at the same time, that he was not authorised to say to whom the residue was to be given, thus leaving it to t Mr. Pratt to inform the attorney who was to take the ultimate benefit of his property. This was also quite right on the part of Mr. Bar ker, whose conduct seemed to have been perfectly unexceptionable throughout the whole affair. The deed was prepared by the solicitor in blank, and it was by Mr. Pratt's personal direction that -the nam:s of Mr. Barker and Mr. Osborne were inserted in those blanks. Under these circumstances, his Lordship saw no reason to doubt the validity of the deed, and he therefore affirmed the decree below, and dismissed the appeal with costs. cox AND ELLIOTT. His Lordship heard this appeal, which he also affirmed. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Guu.nuaLt., MARCH I. Adjourned Sittings at Nisi Prius in London, after Hilary Term, before Lord MITIRDZW and Common Juries. OIDMALL V. HEAVISIDE. This was an action by a mariner against the Captain of the ship Thames (an East India trader), for an assault. —The declaration stated, the defendant had caused the plaintiff to be flogged, and afterwards put in irons and imprisoned on board the ship, without reasonable cause. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and a special plea of justification, stating that the plaintiff had used] violent and improper language on board the ship, and conducted hiroself in a mutinous manner, and that the punishment had been inflicted upon him in order to preserve diccipline on board the said ship. Mr. BROUGHHIE (with whom was Mr. Bussv) stated the case very strongly against the Captain; but as a part only of his statement was borne out by the evidence, we shall confine ourselves to a detail of the facts as given by the witnesses. The ship Thames, an East Indiaman, of 1,4C0 tom, of which the defendant, Capt. William Heaviside, was commander, left England for Carlton in the early part of the year 1826. The crew consisted of 140 pet sons. The Captain having, in March, 1827, taken on beard a quantity of rattans for his own private adventure, applied to the crew to part with their hammocks in order to make room for thtm, and to those who consented to do-so, he gave two bottles of mum each. Amongst several of tke men, who had got intoxicated with the ;um, a quarrel arose, and t ee men, named Finnis, Barney, and Headburg, having been found fighting together, the Capt. gave orders for t tem to be flogged; accordingly the officers and the rest of the ship's company assembled on the quarter deck in the usual manner, to witness the punishment. Two (keen lashes being ordered to be given to each of the, men, they were inflicted by the boatswain's mate, bUt when Headburg (a Swede) had received his two dozen, the Captain expressed himself dissatisfied with the con duct of the mate, who, he said, bad been favouring Headburg, because he was a countryman of his, and immediately ordered him another citizen lashes, which were given ; the Captain having swern that he would punish the mate unless he infl cted them. The plaintiff and another mariner. named Castles, were standing near the Captain at the time. Castles having made some gestures which gave offence to the Captain, the latter said to him. " ll—n your b—d. what are you looking at r collared him, and said, " I have got my eye on some of you," and then, throwing Castles firm him, gave hien a blow on the head with his sword. At this time the whole of the ship's crew were assembled on the quarter deck. The Captain said, "I had thought, that this business was done with." The plaintiff replied, " I thought so too." These words one of the witnesses stated %ere not spoken rudely, but "rather in a friendly way." In a minute or two after, the plaintiff said, at HI had my will, there should be no flogging at all." This was said in rather an under tone, as if not meant for the Captain's ear. The Captain. however, immediately ordered the plaintiff to go aside, saying, " I'll speak to you by and by." After the flogging of the three men, the Captain ordered him to come for ward, saying to the officers assembled, " You heard, Gentlemen, what this man said; I shall now punish him as a mutineer." The boatswain was then ordered to flog him, and he was accordingly tied up in the usual manner, and received four dozen lashes with the cat o'•nine tails. From the severity of them his back was dreadfully lacerated, and continued so for some time. He was then, by the Captain's orders, put into irons, and placed in the poop, where he remained exposed the whole of one night and the following day. He was after wards taken below into the steerage, and from thence removed into a small narrow dal k passage near the quarter-gallery. He remained in solitary confinement nine or ten days in the whole, during which time he was kept in irons, and no surgeon was allowed to attend bim ; and during five days of his imprisonment he was kept upon bread and water. It was stated by Mr. Brougham in his opening speech, and attempted to be proved by the witnesses, that the plaintiff had incurred the resentment of the Captain because he had refused to part with his hammock, and that the Captain's sub sequent conduct towards him arose from that circuun stance. The evidence, how - ever, did not support the statement. It was proved that the plaiotiff was in gee neral a quiet inoffensive man, and always attentive to his duty; but it came out in cross-examination, that be had once been flogged on board a man of war for inebriety. One of the witnesses, in cross-examination by Sir JAMES SCAALIITT, stated, that before the flogging took place, th ore had been a good deal of talkuag . below about tbi severity of the ship; and that the plaisiffhad said tp the crew, they could talk below, but were afraid to 06 so when they came upon deck. It was also proved, dust while the Rigging was going 00, or immediately After, the plainti ff, addressing the crew, said, u There's not a man amongst you:" and, "if every man was of my mind, there should be no punishment on board."— , Only out witness, however, swore to the latter expres sion ; and Castles (the man whom the Captain struck with his sword) state', that he had told the defendant's attor ney that such an expression had been used, but that this statement WAS untrue. • It was attempted to be shown, in the cross-examination of the witnesses, that the plaintiff had used a goad deal of insulting language to the Captain, and that upon his being de , ited to strip, he took off his shirt and threw it at the Captain's feet; but neatly all the questions of this scut were answered in the negative. It was stated, however, that, after the flogging, the plaintiff told the Captain he might Bog him again if tie liktd, as it was not the first flogging found thougl it evek he del that p' again ever, receiv and hi jury, offerei Mr. house vancei made patch he hadhad. Sr JA MRS SCARLET with whom were Mr. F. Poi. Lf ck and Mr. GUMMING), for the defendant, at first proposed to call witnesses in support of the defendant's plea of justification, but having, after an elaborate re• view of, and able comments upon, the evidence given for the plaintiff, conceived that he had satisfied the Jury that the facts, as stated in the plea, had been made out by the plaintiff's own witnesses, he eventually de alined to call any witnesses on the part of the defen dant. Ile admitted the proposition of his Learned Friend (Mr. 1:1,-ougharn) that a Captain of a ship had no right to inflict punishment upon any of his crew be yond what was absolutely necessary to prevent mutiny and preserve discipline; and that if he committed any excess of punishment, he was liable to an action for damages. Mx what were the facts of this case? Had it not teen clearly shown by the plaintiff's own wit *lmes, that the plaintiff had been guilty of mutinous conduct, and had therefore justly rendered himself amenable to that punishment which had been inflicted npon him? Three men, it appe lied, had been sen tenced to punishment for riotous and discord, r 1) conduct on board she ship. It had been - said that they had been made drunk by the Cartain with the turn he had given I them; as it the Captain would have risked not only the loss of a cargo of 200 0001. value, but h-s own life and the lives of no less than 140 pet sons under his case. Was it likely that he should have dcine this? Was it probable that be should first have made the men chunk, and then have punished them for fighting? What was' the meaning of his expression, " I thought all this had been done with?" Did it, as the yitnesses had su • g gested, refer to the punishment ''Which was then just about to be inflicted, or did it refer to some prior trans.' actions that had taken place on board the ship? Could the Jury suppose that it had reference to any thing else than to former disorderly conduct on the part of some of the crew ? The Ciptain had felt it to be his imperinis l duty to make an example ail these men. He had in vain endeavoured by remonstrance and,entreaty to repress the disorders of which they had been guilty ; and it therefore became absolutely necessary that he should administer a public example. Unless he had done so, he would have been guilty of a dereliction of his duty, .and would have subjected himself to the coas.-quences of a mutiny taking place. What does he do then? He orders the punishment, and assem bles the whole of the ship's company on the quarter deck to witness it. While they are so assem bled, the plaintiff endeavours to excite the crew to that mutinous conduct which it was the Captain's object to repress. He uses the most inflammatory, the most se ditious language. He says, " There is not a min amongst you ; and if I had my mind, no flogging should take place r This is addressed to tie whole of the crew, and could the Jury conceive anything more calcutaied to excite them to acts of violence and outrage? Was "this such c. nduct as the Captain could, consistently with his duty, have allowed to pass unpunished ? In causing the plaintiff to be punished under those circum stances, he had done no mote than he was bound to do, in order to repress that mutinous spirit which had, arisen, and which, if it had extended to the whole of the crew, might have been productive of the most cala mitous results. Lord I'ENTERDEN recapitulated the principal fatal, to the Jury. The only question for them to deter. mine was, whether the plaintiff had or had not con. ducted himself in such a manner as to justify the punishment inflicted on him? It was, undoubtedly, the duty of a Commander of a ship, wherever he saw the least tendency to mutiny,instantly to take means to repress it, and for that purpose he was justified in inflicting whatever F unishment might be necessary upon the individual who..e conduct was likely to create dan ger. The safety of the ship, and the lives of the whole crew depended upon the courage and fit mness of the Captain, and upon obedience to his eiders being en forced. It was the duty of the clew to support him in the exercise of his authority; and unless he inflicted wanton and unnecessary punishment upon any of them, be was not amenable to the law. The plaintiff had certainly used mot improper language, and such as was highly calculated to inflame the minds of the crew while they were assembled on the quarter deck; and it the Jury were of opinion that the Captain had reasona ble cause to suppose that his object was to prevent the punishment of the three men from being carried into effect, aid to excite the rest of the crew to mutiny and disobedience of the Captain's orders, they ought to find for the defendant ; but if, on the contrary, they thought that the plaintiff had not so misconducted himself as to justify the punishment inflicted upon him, then they would give a verdict for him, with such damages as they thought him entitled to. Tire Jury, after retiring for a short time, found a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 501. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GUILDUALL, Marren 1. gluing, after Hilary Term, before Mr. Justice BUSROUGH, and a Common Jury. KENTON V. SINTON. _ _ _ Re t. and MI several fendar wrath MI ant, 1 nothii he m, Ve At fixed On brougi nn nisi sea Bai at Sw. priionei format" search: of the 18^8, These was rn: The I can innocei not ticti front r and net The The not te ThL The The your The Ir ',Mat Priseni The' The them. The ley ?- The belor shot then Ser tool dres sub , own , of ' peci C: cei , the Mr. STEERS opened the pleadings. In this case Mary Ann Hill Benton was the plaintiff, and Elijah Wiseman Benton was the defendant. The declarat•on stated that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for money lent. The defendant pleaded that he was not liable, and thereupon issue was joined. Mr. Sergeant JONES stated, that the plaintiff and de. ' fendant in this action were sister and brother, and that the former was compelled to b ing the present acti .n to recover a sum of 601. which she had auvanced by way of loan to the latter. In the month of Api il, 1826, the defendant, who resided at a place called Vauge, in Es sex, and of which be had been overseer, came to the plaintiff, who was at that time living with her brother-in• law in town, and after having stated that he had fallen into arrear with the parish, accounts, and that he was also in fear of an arrest from a banking-house at Billericay, to which he had become indebted, he applied to the plaintiff for a loan of sixty pounds, with which he said he should be able to make good his payments. The plaintiff replied, that she had not the money by her at the time; but that she would send it in a few days, by the Horndon coach : which she did accordingly. On another occasion, the defendant had applied to the plaintiff for 1001. which she had the precaution net to advance without the se curity of a promissory note; and it was indeed loran nate that she bad done so; for when the defendant a fi: ►etu nr t. A, w• Sri, sion mii .. , . - 3 that his shier had no security for the 60L and OLD BAILEY SFASIONS. ght that she might find a difficulty in proving that • -•-•enie...... The Sessions basing terminated, Friday morning the Itssessess er came to his hands, as it had been sent by coach, peoe sc e n ed te e n d c :G O T aza th en v t , en a :se a u s p ir o d n * u the on V3 sa rio ni n ve s p i rl H eo a n s ars: inn etermined not to pay it ; and when applied to for -- r purpose, he told the plaintiff she might get it Eleanor Bryant and Mary P 1314, Andrew Powell, and Georg; nif she knew how. The Learned Sergeant, how- Wyatt. for stealing from the person ; John Jones, Charles Wei t . would now call witnesses, who would prove the bury, James Wicks, Samuel Wien, Henry Godfrey, Joseph I. t of the money by the defendant beyond all doubt, fevre i Henry Fm nd m vv an, i lie William Mitchell. George Mitchell, is he should then confidently await the verdict of the 1 m Johns, alias Jones, for liouse-breaUe e . . m aul; la'r a c a en re y a rWilliam Forbes, for stealing in a dweßing Wiwi ,as he was convinced no good defence could be Francis Arthur Anderson, on his own confession, for the Ste of: 1 NumBER 12 , 802 3 • .ed, much less established. fence ; Edward Barry, and Thomas Johnston, for horse-strafirsgi .' • r. John Richard Platt, thefirother-in-law, at whose Alex ; Ephraim Shorter, J Sh oh or o t e lsi r le a b li oi as i Roh d e j rt ob Sho s rt e v i s d e m for uttering i forged e the plaintiff was living when the money was ad notes ; be Transported w fur Life — Jane and Ei n irt, for stealing , for from * t6NTKACTS FOE SUPPLYING PRO ed, stated that he was present when the defendant person • John Piston , for stealing oats to the value of 7s. Wilh ae , . J NG , LINEN, COALS, CANDLES ARTICLES, FOR CONVICTS ON B e the application, and that he had afterwards dis - Steer, for a violent assault and stealing two hats ; William H owar d, hed the 601. by the coach. alias Josiah or Joshua Bell, for a violent assault with intent to rah , London, F William Malley. ebecca-Rosetta Platt, Martha-Amelia, Henrietta, For Founeen Years—Ann Brown, Thomas Button Fenton, Gee; UCH Persons as ate desirous of Matilda Benton, the sisters of the patties, proved Smith, Eliza al.cris, Charles Itootsey, Cash. Ragan, James Greesi •.. the Superintendent of Convicts to as ral conversations, in which they had heard the tie- John Bunn, ?dary Aun Hales, alias Miles. h For o, SezcY a ears we N tb la b r ,e y Kniv o a ro n e , e John eo W e r r ight oo l!obrt G Heea; I eese, Barley, Oatmeal, Salt, Beer, Coals, ant say that be owed the plaintiff 601. but that he . °aching, Necessaries, Blankets, Woollen C Id never pay her, as she had nothing to show for U. Owens , John m Jnnes, Thomas Smith, John . Clancy, Williewl 4 Litsen and Cotton, Wrapper Cloth, Shoes, an Ir. Sergeant TADDY, who appeared for the defend• Blackman, John Gregory, Edward Hill, John Scott, John Bet: -r l Convicts on board Hulks at Porta:non having cross-examined the witnesses, said he had rows , Henry Isaacs, alias Henry Adlard, James Campbell, lamed Bates John Alexander, David Digby, * *rich, Sheerness, and Chatham, may receiv in gto offer in contradiction of their testimony, and • Sl W u irli cers s, D W an ii i i e j l ai pennis, 'John Hackett , ?V ho.* DitrekenY,J ari a; ' Contracts on applying to the Superintendent rust therefore submit to a verdict against his client. Picto a n m , Henry Miller, Mary Witney , 3az w ter - Stanton , l Thernai e diet for the plaintiff—Damages, (101. Cadbury , Joseph Waite, William Smith, Thomas Driscoll, Soo-en 7 . .._ , Lambeth Terrace , an en board the severe Joseph aitheir Tenders at the Commissariat Office, t the rising of the Coutt, the adjqui nment day was cir:mths. James Pascoe, Maria Jones, Stephen Cotter Willie* ected to the Superintendent 1 for Tuesday, the 15 h of April. Stone, James Suthmier, Elizabeth Starbuelt, Thomas King. Joke up a thereon leT and directed to furnish Supplies for Co Osborne, Richard Clarke, John Palliser, David Noble, Charles ender --,------ Littlejohn, William Griffith, Joseph Charles, James Smith, Ellen brill/DAT, the 18th of March, but none or' POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Cockling, John Foot, Eliza Harrison, Charles Jobbing, Sunset Twelve b'Clock on that day ; nor will any Racks, George Chapman. James Bean, William Cardmen, Wes. oaten tiettle'on, or annexed to, a printed P MANSION-HOUSE. Ridley, Robert Smith, Henry Jones, Charles Willie, John Atkin. 1 Saturday a man named 164- Thornfey, alias Bill Moly was son, James Mason, James Blyth, Charles Bayle, Robert Barry, inserted in W o rds at len g th ; nor unless si g ns ; ht before the Loan Mayoa,and he underwent an examination and forty others. • - known Property etigagieg to become bound 'spicier] of having been concerned ir, the robbery of the Swan- Thomas Riorden, convicted of bigamy, was not eentencel *dog, In the Sem.expressed in the Particu lank. Mr. T. It. Jones attended as solicitor for the bankers Jonathan Reynolds, convicted of the like offence, to be impri. fans-stet of the Contract. vansta ; Mr. Gates attended from the London bankers. The .soncd in the House o f Corr e ction and ke p t to hard :abeam fur 111 ner had been apprehended in the coarse of the day upon is - months. at ion received from Swansea, where he is well known. On The judgment of William Jones , tried for t h e mur d e r of Mo. . • COSTOMaII ping him, three bank notes were found,one (tar 501. No .5,817, Jeffs, and who pleaded g uilty to a charge of stealing a coat, w e FOR SALE BY AUCTI to 24th January, 1828 ; one 101. No. 5,824, 26th of January, respited until next Session. ,' . By °Mere( the Hon. Commissioners of his ; and another for lig. No. 15,970 , of t he Is t of Feb. me. In the whole there were 240 prisoners sentenced, some to bt -4 At the Custom House at this le notes were handed to the Lord alayor, and whilst Mr. Gates imprisoned for various terms, and a great number to be whippea 1 , os w NDNISPLY, 12th day of March, 1828, making some private communication to him respecting them, it, and out of the gaol. 2 the Morning precisely, Ise prisoner —Oh, you may examine them as lung as you please. . . .. a bring forward the person that gave them to me. lam an IRACULOUS ESCAPlL—Thursd.iy last the son oft T H E UNDERMENTION M cent man; I can bring forward undeniable characters that I've soldier, stationed on the heights of Dover, fell over the 4. • IN SUNDRY LOTS, vi been out of town for weeks and weeks; and you, Mr. Solicitor,l,79B Yards White Cotton Fringe, for l Swansea, I know you ; why don't you take the ri g ht people, CI if ; all feared he would have been dashed to atoms; :AK; Curtains, &c. net give them trouble what's g ot nothing to du with it? fortunately, however, s'me projecting bushes caught •r -. 1397 yards Silk 19 pair he Loan MATOK—But pray tell us where you got these notes? him, which broke his fall, and wonderful to rehrte, not. s less yards Silk Ribbon ' 14 Cant he prisoner (in great an g er)-1•11 give you no iliformation ; I'll withstanding the height he fell, when picked up and ` 14! yards Blond Lace 13 Don besides take the trouble to do it ; rye a hundred notes bets those. . 39 Silk Handkerchiefs Col he Chief Clerk—Where do you keep your cash? brou g ht to the to p of the shaft, he bounded off to regain i he Prisoner—At my own banker's. his companions with the agility of a hare. T he ch il d so.l S 4 ytairktisSeTh Scarfs 9 S Thread Lace 4 Peler irgi Ir. Gates—Where is that? was between five and six years old. 5 yards 'Cambric 66 pies be Prisoner—No matter for that ; I can tell you that if I had - 8a dozen Harp Strings con r notes, that neither you nor the bankers would ever see them MEETINGS OF CREDITORS, BASIN GHALLATHIEXT. 1115 Muskat Snuff Boxes 22 pair 129 bolt n and I don't care about saying so before the public. M... .• eI S Iti al sh e e , d 3t S e. tonto for Watch 14 pair be LORD MATOR—I find your name is now given in by you H. Chaplin , Deptford, Kent, zolcow. relliam Thornley." Have you not gone by the name of Broad? H. Hewitt, Crotched - friars , merchant :-. ::: :7 3 5 1 1 0 9 5 lb. Bugle Beads 155 plain Cisoner—Yes. A. Definer, Judd-street, Brunswick-square, apothecary ... 3lt . 1 Clock Movement 566 Colo be Loan bleyoa—And also of Thomas Thornley ? J. Cooke, Liverpool, dealer ... 510 - 9 ib. Chocolate . 18 lb. 'be Prisoner—Yes, they are all my names ; I was christened by W. Kadwell, Krum, Kent, bricklayer ' ...: "... -.. 510 41ti. Human Hair About 6d n. T. Freer, High-street, Shoreditch, cheesemonger ......5 10 434 - pair Leather Weirs neg 'be Loo Marisa—What, all! Thomas William Broad Thorn- W. Nokes, Southend, Kent, miller .... • 3 11 Together with sundry Articles of Jeweller !—The prisoner replied in the affirmative,—He was remanded. P. Milne and Co. New yank - street , Commercial-road , met. 3 1 ' lets, Clasps, Buckles, Necklaces, Rings, &c. G. Packwood, High -street, Southwark, shoe-manufacturer 3 IC , A Deposit of .C 25 per cent. will LENT ASSIZES. T. Wills, Tring, Hens, innkeeper •. :.- The Goods may be viewed the Two Ds W. Sherwood and Co. Paternoster-row, booksellers .. 2 •10 OXFO CIRCCIT—READING, Fan. 29. E. A Walking , Bath , draper awl eststegues had during Office Hours, Is. R D ..• seemed to Purchasers. The Commission was opened here this day a little C. J. Carter, Dean -street, 01%rd-tercet, builder .....2 10 J. Dibden Bayham-street, Camden -town, victualler ... 210 . _ ore two o'clock, by Mr. Baron VAUGHAN, who was E. i FLOWERS. Mayo, Craven buildings , Drury-lane woollen draper .. 1 I ntly after joined by Mr. Justice PARK. The Court T. J . R -ear, Sloane-street, Chelsea. chrilist .. ... ... I It This day was published, on adjourned to four o'clock. After attending avioe W. Odell, Holla nd. at ß he o r t i h n e e r - h st it r b e e et ,:in* bw i rd tikpee ns tome keeper - ... 1 11 A new Edition , in Imo. with coloured tvice, Mr. Baton VAUGHAN, at the hour appointed,... lis ' A. CONCISE and PRACTICAL ik his seat in the Cross n Court, and proceeded to ad- D H. T P e alnier i H e i e g d h- p stre l e e t, o Vir t elte l, pet, c ed oeduna le. ker .... •1 1 :0 1 the Growth and CULTURE of t ss the Grand Jury. Several trifling causes were E. Coorrpye'r, Sp r ead Russell-street, Ag-ca haberdasher rees 1 .. ... IJO PINIC, AU'RICULA. POLYANTHUS, hstquently disposed of. The calendar contains the DMDINDS. TULIP, HYACINTH, ROSE, and oche W. Brydon and Co. Combat, druggists 1 - a Dissertation on Soils and Manures, and C Ines of fiity- three prisoners; but with the exception e ßicb o mond.Surrey,_tailor ...... ::: ..... 1 - 1 two or three cases, the offences are not mat ked with _I.!. Gasc t 7ne_ , _ ''t esteemed Varieties of each Flower. By THOMAS HOG collar features of atrocity. ual Hawkins, 110aiddi Berkshire , ltdon.road draPer ''' •.. " 10 • '" A. sh opkee per --- ••• ..- IS • . Printed for Geo. B. Whittaker, As CROWN SI DE, MARCH I.—Before Mr. Baron VAUGHAN. J. Baker and Co. Nicholas-lane, wine merchants .. .. 11 William Brown, Joha Ivey, and William Straightens, W. W. Prosser and Co. Fenchurch-street, wine merchants .. 11 - THE INQUISITIO !re indicted for burglatiously breaking and entering T. Lawford and Co. Bevis Marks, say factors J. Harrop, Grasscroft, Yorkshire, clothier e house of Thomas Burrower , of Abingdon, and price 15s. IL - li: . i l l . .. Thh day was published, a new Edition, in o Wing thereout 301 b. of beef, 301 b. of veal, 12 pigeons, INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. THE HISTOnY of the INQUISI • The Matters of the PISTITIONS and Scrianuers of the Panorsits 4 a carving knife. Mr. Burrowes having detailed the particulars of the hereinafter-named trloambeed (the same having been filed in t he Court) are LLORENTE (formerly S v c Translated o and abridged from the NV heard at the Court House, in Portugal -street, Si of the prof city in question, proved fi nding the ap po inted Inn-fields, on MONDAY, the 10th of March, at Tea - d i so N ) T , O co N m l pased from the Original Document the Supreme Council, and the subordinate T Tying knife concea!ed in a hay rick. He went to in the Forenoon. Ann Barton, late of Grub-street, grinder and leather cutter Painted for Geo. B. Whittaker, Av arch there in consequence of evident e he had re - shopkeeper, ', 4 Alio, lately published in Svo. with Twenty Thomas Case, late of Macclesfield-street, C i ty-roa d , ived from Frederick Ploughman, an accomplice of.' of 11l • ra, Cuss, and Religious Cerem and labourer in the London Docks e prisoners. William Foster, late of Great St. James's-street, Lisson-groye, , •' V SKETCHES of PORTUGUESE LIP Frederick Plougham then proved that on the night grocer and cheesenionger question he met the prisoners in Abingdon. Brown John sa rw Ha i rl( li su ir e e d , as John Hair) late of Fleet -street, Birmingham, :' 1 . .. id Ivry first went down into the cellar of the prosecmdraper INDIGESTION, GALVA NI R a o m be u rt el b L i a e n r : im la eu te of Suffolk-street , Peatonville , udtonr green grocer l r, after thawing the sty lea and brought up part o fThis day was published, Second Ed' le meat. They then desiied him and Stiaighton to go and assistant to a warehouseman. a genera. dealer, awn and see what they could find, which they accord- Robert M•Knight, formerly of the following streets In the City of , redid. or er : C dAsdet 1 4 r ; vi S c:f E Af NI t:N S hsptel3l o 4:t f moaEn: t s l aG : T e cg s wt L: U Ni . ti c ,: i c rn::: E aL inn i sta s h : wcpe L ahlorsii: T ml igly chd, and brought up the pigeons, knife, andothe vi ?e i ventry, viz—Hertford. Migh, and St. Nie l h d ola i s, draper Wi ll ili a a m m MlN:liseeYt; ( H su a e c d kn w ey, draper and g !mail:der of the meat. They afterwards went to the ith John Engley) late of Southgate-strett, ay tick and divided the spoil. Gloucester, fishmonger and Abdontinai Viscera; On t t oss-exarnination by Mr. CARRINGTON, he said Robert Potts, late of Ratcliffe Cross, master mariner By M. LA BAUME. e rever had any of thc spoil ; be WAS not the worst of John Shipman, late of Fludyer-street, Westminster, solicitor ANlaettheaondieelrSsmioei tho: jaariharate-na-sttrertete: SoWmaeltwaoTr th ow n o , u o t ut f o b f ti business ete Bl oo msbury and Northern Dispensaries, London Electrical Dispensary, Gratuit se patty, though other people might think he was, nor ad he proposed that robbery, though he had others.— John Todd, late of Lon g P Melford, near Sudbury, Su o ffol a k, a carpentet le should have taken his share of the meat, but did not and builder hl l a a n t n e i o st f e u r p C pe oo r per sey W at o o rts ui. ( t s t u r Ld t. b ßu y t et bs ou n sec am uer e o e f , b le a l k a e n r n . ister . Woos) Also, by the same Auth ke to take it home. Observations and Facts on the Chymica cy of eilalyanistn in the Cure of The deputy gaoler of Abingdon gaol was then called, rO healiff- M pea ll ett D efii A lv.e ß Y. ;* Practical illustrations; also, Remarks on s nil confirmed the testimony of the last witness as far T Tr u s o tt o y . - - B s un un ri: H t s s ß a a t: n• dies; with Three Plates. Price is. s related to Brown, by relating a confession of Brown. -4. ur. Poblished.by Highly, Fleet-street, and N The Learned JUDGE said, that as that could not affect WZDNISDAT— Tear celebrated -P ltm Dr. Samuel Parr, LL.D. 411 and may be had of Souter, St. Paul's Cb be other two prisoners, be thought the evidence of such died, aged 79. Tnuasner—The elegant and classical Anna Letitia Barbanli , B_And-.trees; reef; and all Booksellers. witness as Ploughman was not sufficient without con• diet, aged 82p. GOSS'S WORKS. irmation. y d e y or tfarthage, who suffered Mr. SHEPHERD said that had been his feeling all along. mart a rrgm — at a t r h Pe e t a u g a e of a 2 N 2, a in ble th La e Hosninersi vagina nostra sapit. The Jury then acquitted Straighton and Ivey, and • Our page relates to man.—Me BIRTH. Just published, price ss. in boards, cm ned a verdict of guilty against Brown.—Sentence At the Admiralty, Mrs. Keith Douglas, of a daughter. MARRIED. 1. rirHE /EGIS of LIFE; a Non. tot pronounced. 1. airy am the indiscretions arising fr William Straighton was again indicted for breaking At St. Alkmund's, Derby, the Rev. Charles Hesketh, RA. of ' which the Causes, Synaptonts, and belief rod entering the house of William Cl ild on the 26th of Trinity College, Cambridge, and of Rossall Hall, in the county d scree, Gonorrhoea, Stricture, Seminal Wea ivtember last, and stealing two handkerchiefs, two Lancaster, to Anna Maria Alice, only daughter of R. Saunders, Esq. veloped ; Part IL anthraces Practical Debility, Self-Abuse, and Mental •Irritatior tan of shoes, and an umbrella. DIE D. ` Observations on Vesetabk and Animal • Mr. CARRINGTON conducted the prosecution, and At Brighton, the Rev. E. Northey, of Woodeote, near Epsom, Series of Cases illustrative of the preced :ailed Elizabeth Child, the wife of the prosecutor, whothem in a familiar manner.—By GOSS an andAtCala.uadlatsawf Windso r. theßev Thomas Hodges , Rector of New Radnor, pore d that on her return home she found the window and of Aston, Herefordshire. geon,London. - aura open, and the articles in question gone. Rev. T. Williamson , brother o f the late Sir Hedworth William- Nature beatis Wm. Hussey, the constable, who took the prisoner son, Bart. of Whitburn Hall, Durham, and Rector of Stoke Dame Plirlihtls rue kiln si spits bussescognovert nto custody, produced the property found upon him, eel, A i t r. the e c e o u u d n eu t y , o Kent, Devon. in Since lle.s.vax to all the fund of his 74th y ear , the Rev. John Ha tton, of which was identified by the prosecutor, his wile, and Rolvenden ' and of Houghton - le-Sp ring, Durham. 2. UM ' Its frugal application marks the wise. HANA . a Non-Medical Analysis o laugi,ter. Rev. J. Rogers, Rector of Feniton, Devon. dental to Fema les, in which are offered The Jur found the risoner Guilt Sentence not At the Vicara g e House, Barrow, near Barton, Lincolnshire, 01 aa does on tbe peculiar debilities attendin g th y p y .— Rev. Edward Henry Hesleden, M.A. Vicar of that parish, pathits, and fors The subject of Ste pronounced. formerly Fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford. Mr. CURWOOD applied to the Court to permit At Over Worton, the Rev. Walter Ida er M.A. of Pembroke spots. Intertstipg mad important cans illu land, A At Minister Edinburgh,bot Hem y Turner, one of the gang, to go before the Grand College , Oxford, and Curate of the above pl a ce. Q u o fugit yaws? lieu! quove color Jury to give evidence. The learned Counsel observed , Whither flies Love? Ah! whsswthe that the committing Magistrate, with a view to insure Nort honth Letatithh,aldt.eetrbley re rested. Walter Fogo Ire- The thole may be had of Sherwood, Gil the conviction of the offenders, had taken the depositions dealer, in tbe artl 6 l, on the 9th ult. Mr. Alexander A n derson,picture seemester-row ; C,chapple,s9,l l 4ll-mall; S. th year of his age. Callow and Wilson 16,•Princes-street, co of Turner on oath as a witness; he, Mr. Garwood , be. 6 ________—..-- 1 ...—...... Robe; T. and G. Underwood, 52, Plygt-s lieved that Turner was the most notorious offender . MAILS—THIS DAY. 374, Fleet - street ; Onwhyn, 1, . Catkerine. Mr. Baron VAUGHAN said, that it was a question en- MIN. DM ARR. DNS. Reuben mei Stevenson, Burks and Kin Dublin tirely for the consideration of the Learned Counsel. waterfurd 20 1 France 1 0 Dpek, Ipewich ; 'Sutton, Bory St. Earn As the depositions had been taken, perhaps the better 2 0 Hamburg 0 1 street; lkistol ; Narrate and • puifielcf, •11 Gueruse, and Jersey t o Flanders 1 0 Todd, Briggafe, Leeds ; Wrightson, B way would be to allow him to go before the Grand Jury. Lisbon o 1 I Sweden 0 1 R a t ter ; Wolstinholme, York ; Gore, Li True bills were subsequently found against eight of Donaghadee • 0 0 I Leeward Islands 0 0 cheater ; hisPlorn, 155, Tiongate, gibs the poachers—for shouting at the keeper with intent to Buenos Ayres 0 1 I Brazil 0 1 Edinburgh; Porter, 72, Graft, strect,D Holland o 1 1 Jamaica 0 0 sellerse-iPrice 55.) kill, for highway robbery, and for poaching. - -- Hltik I- W A 3. EX( at LONDON-BIM/ 6 K 1 0 MOIL Mita. Messrs. Goss and Co. are tote consults: Owing to the continued illness ut Justice BEST, Mr. Morning . 0 minutes alter 4 their houn ; am' Patients in the country a , • . • Sergeant ONSLOW has been appointed to the Cornelis sion on the I-time Circuit, and will be Mr. Justice Bun Afternoon . 17 minutes after 4 which tan be forwarded to aoy.ert of the .i. . . o Got t , e s l Lo y sand h i e tn. ca c se pt , c li n i c . l aA otan . g ours,mis a retnitt s an ti c o. e I NOVGII'S coadjutor on the occasion. . . Lus.Do as li t r zic rr s ui za te r d i a , n r d m i' s u , b: N :sli v ed . 1 ,byriJcko‘tatistl'ailawcatriTr.tinthre:tp.ropitarteta Minamm --,-......A.-.