Star. — London, England, 1802-06-07 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 4. AND COIL,:b111;ItlirS. Tina w.t• all AiliOn Il()Vlt. The plaintiff, 1 1 / 4 1;t1 y Butler, lived with a p:r.nn named C• n : who kept the Wheatthcaf public-hang, in Tnthi•i. (tree, NVellminiler. A^. es.:c•ritin was lent into the hold:, which fwent off les er4l trifling thing , belonging to .Jr.:s Butler. The defence wilt, tii.it the parties lived together as man and wile. p..ited for iiich in the general aimation of the world, anj had ti,e,inirial of the Chriflian name marked ~ n. their pots as Cane's wife; and that it was impoEri ble for the Sheriffs to didiuguith the prop..rty of the one fiarn the other. The Jury found a verdid for the defendants. senlvmE ALLFS AVDOLITFR, TOR AV ASSAULT. The atfault complained of in this cafe was com ;pitted on the road between Carthalton alai Lon don. Sono- time ago the Plaint Mr. Browne, his wife, and Mrs. 11.:1d, going air ivg on that road in a chaife, they were paired by Mr. Allen and Mr. Oliver, i , n horiehack. when one of them made an oblervation in their hearing refptaing the perfon of Mrs. 13rowne, to which was added fome indeli cate language, not Ft to be publicly repeate.l.— Mr. Browne la:d, they were impertinent fellows, or fomething to that effeet ; upon which Mr. Al lea turned back and afked him what he laid ? Mr. Browne replied he had forgot. Allen ladled up on kn.,wing, which at lalt ended in a fcrtille. Allen firuck Mr. Browne Writ, but in the contelt he got much the word of it, for Browne gave him a couple of black eyes. Oliver then faid he was Browne's man, and offered to fight him, butßrowne cleaned. Mr. GIBBS, for the Defendants, inlifted that the provocation arofe from the impertinence of the Plaintiff, Browne, who had no ground of offence, for the only thing faid by the Defendant, as they heard was, merely that Mrs. Browne was a fine woman. This, he infitted, was no realonable cattle cf offence to Mr. Browne, or if it was, it was fpnkeii by a Mr. Worley, one of their company, and not by either of the prefent Defendants. He infifted also that Mr. Alien had the greateft caufe of complaint, inafmuch as he had got the moll of the beating. Lord ELLENP.OROUGH laid, he rather expteled that Mr. Gibbs meant to call evidence to Phew that the words were not loch as had been liated.— His Lordfhip, however, gave it as his opinion, that pet fon; going along, wh.•ther gravely in the entitle of their bufinels, or decently in perfuit of their pleafure, ought not to have their feelings in (lilted by oblervati•,ns made upon them within their hearing. If the words welt only fuch as had been reprefentsd by th► Defendant, namely, that " Mrs. Browne was a fine woman," and not as re prefented by the other tide, as alluding to a fr eret intereourfe," yet they were filch as ought not to have been impertinently laid in the hearing of a hufband. But whether Allen (poke them or not, Was not material, inafmuchas he, being the perfon to demand an explanation of the obfervation they provoked from the Plaintiff, adopted them and embodied diem in his fubfequent condat. Nei ther did he think it was any argument in favour of Allen that he got the worn of the conceit; if he had provoked it, the other did right to make the belt ufe of the flrength which Nature had bellow ed upon him, in repelling an allault attempted up on his perfon.—Verdia for the Plaintiff—Da mages tool. JLU S• THE RING V. THE INHABITANTS OF THE COUNTY I i c 1 1. illik OF HERTFORD. This was an indiertment ?pint the inhabitants of Hertfordihire, for not repairing a public bridge acrofs the river, which feparates that county from Ellis. The plea let up by the Defendants was, that the county was not bound to repair it, but that the obligation lay upon William Field, Li 1. toe Lord of the Manor of Stantlead Abbey. To prove this, evidence WAS given cf the timber with which the bridge had been repaired 5o years ago, having been felled upon Mr. Field's land, and by his orders conveyed to the bridge. This folitary iutiance was not deemed ludieient to take tl bur th.:n oif the county, to impede it on an individual; accordingly :he jwry forud a vern:a for the tARZY V. MORRIS. The Plaintiff and Defendant are Potters, and 11anulafturers of Sugar Isiouicis, a butinefs fol lowed by but few perfons in the kingdom ; and this kiwis was brought to recover damages inf. tamed by the Plaintiff, by reafon of the Defen dant's having enticed a perfon of the name of Deal, a Labourer, out of tie fervice of the Plain tiff, after he had commenced, and before he had nailed a piece of work for him, and harbouring that perfon, by employing him in his, the Defen dant's fervice, after notice that he had quitted the Plaintiff's fervice, and kit h:s work unfinifhed. The law of this cafe is clearly laid down in 6 Term Rep. 221, by which it is Rated, " that an ajion will lie for tecciving or continuing in em ployment, the Servant of another, after notice that he is that Servant—That a perfon who con tra6l; with another to do any. piece of work for lira, is the fervant of that other, until that work is finifhed, and therefore no one elk has a right to employ him until Inch work is finifhed." The circumftances of this cafe were dick: Deal the laixarier had worked for the Plaintiff feveral years. In July laff he had a piece of work oa Nand, and left his i‘lafier, when there were about eight days labour remaining to finilh it. He went to tlvz Defendant who hired him. The Plaintiff fent to the Defeniant a IC:ter, {dying, g , I beg leave to acquaint yon, that NVilliarn Deal whom you hare in your employment as a potter, is engaged at my Manufaaory to work, which work lie has left unfinifhed, and-I trial, after this notice, that Too, as a tradefman, will not detain or harbour im; if you do, I Ilan be under the neretlity of commencing an attion againft yon.—lfaac Parry." The Defendant told the hearer of the letter, that the Defendant, had had nothing to do in the great unile, that he thould like to have a Much at it—that if D.:al ow.:•I h It. Parry any tistmey, he would pay IlaCenger raid, 61 it was not the money that the Plaintiff wanted,; but the labour of the man who had left his fervice." The Defendant replied, is You may tell Mr. Parry that I have as many 13Acks to give to the Lawyers as he has Moulds." He kept Deal in his employ ment; the work of Deal at the Plaintiff's faoftory was left tmfinifhed. Lord ELLSNHOROUCH obferved there was no cvidcn:z of the Defendant's enticing the workman, aim his mailer, hut there was enough of the har bouring :die r notice,aud that was ildlicient to fup port tins aerion. Verdid for the Plaintiff, damages 51. 55. being the value of the labour required to finillt the work. HUNTER AND ANOTILEN. V. ►LLLIN AND CADELI.. This w.ts all Anion brought nominally againft the late Sheriffs, but in fubflance againft one of their Officers, who give them fecurtty for their conduit, for the efcape of a perfon of the name of Henry Hunt, who was arredcd by one of the Of- ficers of the Sheriff of Milldlefex, for tool. at the fuit of the above Plaintiffs for bufinefs done by them as Coachirainters. He was arrefted at his father's houfe, and went up (lairs, and the Officer with him, for his great coat, and as became down he flipt by the parlour door (where the Plaintiff, Hunter, was fitting, be having come there to (hew Hunt to the Officer) and went out of the houfe and was Peen no more. The Sheriff being called upon to return the Writ, returned, "That by command of the Writ, I did arrelt and take the body of the within named Henry Hunt, within my Bailiwick, whole body I fafely kept, until with force and arms he rzfcued himfelf out cf my cliflody, and that afterwards and tip to the time of the return of the find, Writ, the raid Henry Hunt was not found in my Bailiwick." . . _ Mr. Glass cnntcnded that this return 'of the Sheriff' to the Writ in nirellion, intlead uf furnifit ing the Plaintiff with anAetion againd the Sheriff, was an anfwer to fuch Atclion, for it anted a re foie, which was an excufe for the Sheriff upon an efcape after caption upon mcfn e ',weft; it was other wife where the IM'endant was taken in Execution, becaufe in the latter cafe the Sheriff can mile the Pop Conti:a:us ; but he has no loch power in cafe niarrelt upon mineprocefi, and here there was no count in the dchoation that the return of the She riff was falfe. For tilde reafons, which he argued ably, Mr. Gtis as fubmitted that the Plaintiffs thould be noniiiited. Lord ELL ENTIOROUG H having looked at the Re. cord was of opinion that the return was in fub (tance fallified, and therefore refilled to nnnfuit the Plaintiffs, and the caufe was proceeded in.— It was then (hewn that the Plaintiffs' Bill upon Hunt was reafonable, &c. but that the Defen dant, Hunt, was infolvent, and had gone to Ire land to avoid his creditors' purfuit, &c. Lord ELLINSOROVOH laid down to the Jury, that this aftion was maintainable as it Rood, but that the plaintiffs ought not, by this verdia, to be placed in a better condition than they would have been in had they polleffed the body of Hunt. He thought, that at all events, the plaintiffs in this cafe ought to he reimburfed the tolls they had been at in caufing the arra, &c. Now, the aflion being by original, he underftood from a very intel ligent Officer who fat under him (Mr. Lowton, Clerk of Nifi Prius) that the expences were, in filch a cafe, about 12 guineas ; to thi► the Jury would add what they thought was fair to conjec ture as the fum which the plaintiffs might have obtained from Hunt, had their arrefl been effedual. The verdict in this cafe again(' the Sheriff would not difcharge Hunt.—Verdi(t for the Plaintiffs.— Damages 401. 01. D 1:.111.EY. Friday twenty prifoners were tried, four ofwhom were capitally conviaed, viz. _ _ _ Step!..." Olasufer, a black man, for knocking down and robbing Robert Wright, on the t Bth of April, near Tower-hill, putting him in fear and danger of his life, and taking from his perfon 3s. his pro peiry. Robert Wright laid, he was a cußom-houfe offi cer, and being obliged to be out that night later than common, he in going home met the prifoner about eleven o'clock on Tower-hill, who aflted him in broken Englith to direa him his way to Saint Catharine's-lane, where he lodged ; that he ohligiugly offered to thew him the way, and when they i-,•Gt to Cat's hall, the prifoner knocked him dov a and fell upon him. He repeatedly called oot watch and murder ; that the prifoner put one hand upon his mouth, and with the other he felt him rifling his pockets; that in the mean time a woman came up to them with a candle in her hand, but the watchman coming up, the difappeared ; the watchman took the prifoner is cuftody, and he found his pockets turned out, and three Wiling: in Silver and copper gone, which be was fure he had in his pocket. His mouth was bleeding, and his arms were cut with the fall. ' Abel Spittle faid, he was a watchman near Saint Catharine's, and he having called the hour at eleven o'clock; heard the cries of murder and watch, and running to the place from whence the fouad came, he found the old man lying on his back and the prifoner upon him; on pulling him from him the old man defired him to take charge c.f him, for he had knocked him down and robbed him. Another watchman coming up ardted the old man, who feemed much frightened. The prifoner told him in broken Enghfh that he was his comrade, and they had been drinking together; that taking him to the watch houfe he was !'earth. ed, and one (billing and two pence halfpenny found upon him in copper, and that the old man fecrned perfeetly tuber. The prifoner pretending nut to know Engli(h, an interpreter was fworn to explain, who told the Court he demanded to be sried with a Jury of half foreigners, which was done accordingly. In his defence he laid this old man haen drinking gin, was very tick and fell down,..4W he was helping him up. The Jury luund him guilty—Death. 7 &owe O'Brien, for felonionily all:inking Mary Hayward on the King's highway, and robbing her of A linen Lag and 5s. —Guilty—Death. 1 7uhn Tassett and gams Degraiger, two boys. but 01. °WTendars, for privately Itealing a piece of filk liandLerchiels from the (hop of Mr. Baker, in the Strand. Edward Cretan , produced the property which he faw the prifoners drop. which- tbat i as Well as the prifoners, were poroavely (worn to by die prorecutor. Ten were conviaed of felony, viz. The. Levine, for ll,taling a low ;14, the property of C. Hanhury. Tanothv Calla7lan, for tic:ding the handle of a pump and other articles, thepropet t y ofW. Fr'aicr. Fri:c1....r.4, for Ilealitig ten moll tin handkerchief s, the propoly of R. Tit% loth. Eha.a A'at/2, for ilealiag a great coat, the pi (Ter. ty of T. Moore. y. Davie, for fleating a piece of bacon, the pro• petty of T. Rogers. "Inn Bowen, for flealing a coat, the property of G. Howell. T. Burtay, for flealing a piece of nankeen and other articles, the pxopcity of Melfis. tloyd and Clark. T. Cox and 7 Otvree, for (leafing two window I curtains, the property of Arch. Kennedy Malcolm. 7. Payne, for fleating a quantity of Lugar, the property of Mellis. Sills and Co. And fix were acquitted, via. J. Shea", J. Yowl, 17. Patten, 7 ilnderfon, .7. Bolton, and /1 7 . Prudence. The fame day the opinion of the Judges was' delivered by Mr. Juilice Gaose, in the cafe of Michael Michael, who was convicted in February Selnon lafi, and it appearing that tl% indiamcnt was.good, he was t emanded, and will receive judg. ment with the other pritOnas capitally convi&ed this Seflion. On Saturday nineteen prifoners were tried, two of ..110/T1 Were capitally convhfled, viz. jvhe Tromp and yob,: Roberti, for burglarioufly break:ng the dwelling houfe of Thomas Jones, at Hamin_rfroith, and dealing a low and nine pigs. It was politively proved, Ow the place in which the pigs were, communicated with the dwell ing houfe, and that three Servants belonging to the profecutor Slept in an apartment over it. Thele perfons were Welshwomen ; they heard the place broke open in the middle of the night, and beard the pigs taken away, but were fo frightened that they made no alarm at the time. The prifoners, on the morning of the robbery, were fcen with the pigs in Dyottitreet, St. Giies's. They were af terwards feen offering them for fale in Short's- Gardens, Drury-lane ; and foon after they were taken into cuftcrdy with the property inthetr pot fe Twelve were convicted of felony, viz. James Wright, for Stealing three hank notes, ' value god. the property of Samuel Rowland. The profecutor rtid, he was a bricklayer and a bailiff' at Horfhatn, in Sulks. Ha'. ing come to London, and received the money in qneilion, he was accolt ed at Charing Crofs, by a fwineller, who prevailed ' on him to accompany him to a public houfe in Weflminfter. He pretended t 6 be a man of for tune, stilted many queilions about the town of Horfham, where he exprefied a v. ilh to go and build honfes. While they were fitting there, the prifoaer . came in, and asked the way to London Bridge, where the Shipping was ? obferving that he expected to Sind a girl there, who had robbed him ofzool.; that he had just come from Coventry, where his grand-mother, who lately died, left him a considerable property, which the had acquired by keeping the poor of Coventry, the greatelt part of which he loft by this girl, and by playing at chalk. He then withed to thew the prolecntor the nature of the game of chalk ; he began to play with his accomplices, but the profecutor eeft.fed to join, and was about to go away, when the man he first met with Inked him for his aildrefs ; he pulled ont his pocketbook to give it him, when his bank notes fell upon the tabig. One of the parties put them on the top of fevernl thaw notes that were alfo on the table, when the prifoner took up the whole, and laid, " I have won them all ;" and then, by the contrivance of the accom plice, who told the jsrofecntor he Should get his money again, the prifoner made his efcape. In a few days after one of the notes thus stolen was pre fented at the Bank by a linen-draper in Cran bourn-alley, and being Stopped it was traced to a woman refitting at Pentonville, with whom the prifoncr cohabited, and it was proved by the Pro. lecutor to be the fame note. the prifoner took away. The Jury found him Guilty, and the Judge Paid his fentence Should be transportation. • Mary Perry, for healing a pair of women's limes, the property of Thomas Surgy ' • J. Robinfon, for ftealingrfourreen yards of cloth, the property -of John Taylor; T. Smith, T. Williams, alias Long, and J. Mills, allias Pollard, for Stealing four car penter's planes and other articles, the property of John Mailers ; T. Bartlett, for haling a piece of leather and other articles, the property of J. Ro bins; G. Allen, and J. Terry, for stealing a quan tity of copper, the property of the Ealt India Company ; M. Scully, for flealing a hat and two mackarel, the property of J. •Lutfman ; Mary Birch, for dealing_ a Mitt and other articles, the property of John Yarwood ; J. Dixon, for itealiug 281bs. weight of fugar, the property of Me:lls. Searle and Smith. And five were acquitted, among whom was zosavato AT THE FOST•OFFICE Richard Mereefith,who was tried on an indiftment, which charged him with Ilealing a letter, contain ing feveral Bank of England notes ; and alto with uttering the fame, knowing them to be Ilolen. A Clerk, belonging to Mr. John Wallis, of Bod min, in Cornwall, Iwore, that on the i oth of April, he put into the Poll-office of that town a letter di reeled to Melia. DaA fon, Brooks, and Co. Bankers in London, which tontaincd ten Bank of England notes of Sol. each. He alfo paid the Pottmatter half a crown for the poltaige, and marked it as a letter containing money. Phis evidence was cor roborated by the Pollniafter of Bodmin, who laid he had put the letter into the London bag. A Sorter, belonging to the General Pott-office, laid that no perfons but theft belonging to the Poft.of fice, could have been able to take the letter.— There Wab a man named Hill, a meffenger in the Polt-office, who belonged to the franking depart ment, and he had an opportitnity of taking the letter if he chofe, as he had smears to the inland 4rffice. • Mr. Dixon, a clerk ar..4 fvtrr , Dawson and Co. faid, that t.to 1 , .'.•: -1;:., , i never came 111 hand. But they , I advice. th.:tilT, that the tort A I when they were mirtiog, ei.•;, , ..eta L$ , J at the Mi.. .`..;‘‘ift, thz leacry keep-r :1; : 1);.• try, bid, that the I 2 tti of . 1 1 , ;',/ .1 in., c. ,, ; to, pinehafe a lixteenth at hi, ofti•.;-, ..rd .:. e y ;,. ha :iv, lent .role ; lie could not th21,0::!1.!) t thc nian ; !;• h e teadued . a ;col. hank .rote, and in,:‘; notes in eilange. act::: of thoi.e 1":”.;11 afterwards found on the Pri:imcr, as fiateenth of the tiekct, •vh: h NVAS tf) been the fame. that WAS t i ocw-cd from The name 'which the man pt' ~n the note was—E . . " Mr. Johnlton, Old ilrentfia J." A perion who keep:: ;!:Irr'c Oxford-fired, fv:ore, that on ;LI T 30.1 t,t the Prifoner came and porch:C . c.!. •T 51. of goods from him, and offered d 3%.:. back of which he put down " R. joho'don, rise mond." He received the change out of the cote. In fome days after he came to "anotherfilop in Os. ford.flreet, next door to the lath mentioned, braight fume lace, and offered a 501. w.te in payment.— The-perfon who kept this Ihop having heard of notes being flopped at the B.ick, and underitesid ing from his nest door neii.lhhonr, that he had re ceived one of the itc len notes, fent for an t.fficcr, who took the Pi ifoner into untidy. The officer, on fearching the Prifoner, found upon him zo gui neas in gold, and (mall notes to the :irin,unt 1301. It appeared that he had pair:a off ft; of the Itolen notes in different places, and maily ..1 the final' notes found upon him were proved to have been given in change for tome of thelie. notes When the prifoner was afleeetwhere he gut the 501, notes? he anfwered, fiom a petfon in ;he Peil-cf fice : he afterwards contradided.this itatement, 'and raid he found them near the Manfion haute: and at laft he told tht Solicitor to the Poll-office. that he had the notes horn one Hill,.a =Fenger at the Poft.office. A quantity of goods found is the pofieffion of the Prifoner were,produced, and many of them were proved to have been putchafed from perfons to whom lie had paid away fome of the flolen notes. The Prlfoner's'lodging was ita Hackney-road. Wm. Hill was neat called. Herald he had been taken up on fulpicion Of Healing the notes. He pnfitively (wore he never gave any notes to the Prifoner. On his erols-csamination, he confeffed, he had known the PriiOner many years. The Fri loner was a porter. Being afked if he had leen him ddrin7, the Litt two month: ? be at Silt a - fwered in the negative : at lad he laid, be He equivez: , .ted very much, and on being clefe'a prated by the Prifoner'sCounfel,he Paid he would anfwer no queftion at all. The jtidge then 'dz. fired him to recolleft hirnfelf, and aliked,if he haft ken the Prifoner within the laft fix weeks? the wittiefs anfwered he believed he might. The Coun. fel for the ptofecution in this nage, gave up the profecution. The Judge then fai4, there was,no evidence to Mew how the prifoner had mese hi ,the notes, or that he had aolen than ; but thew was reafon tot - opt:ink that Hill knew more of than the prifoner. The Jury therefore aeguittS the prifoner, xvlin was detained en another charge. All the property found on the prifoner was order ed to be given up to tile Profecutor. :I WA NTI•iL), TN the Free Grammar ZiLimolr'hi the Town and A • P..trith o: flobon-lt...Moiirt, in the Cou:ioy of lointallet(far the vloc2 of Hc. , d how y:ir a lint), a. riertlrtqiiv, the is sy2ll to torch firoiLes:srki other Eronehes •of ufefol mid prAlt , .Llterotere. rk Gro.iirm.iipf °poor the 1.41- :vaiitiet,and a Cl:rr.ymin, will Le proLrrerL The cixecl filar i.. Ninety PiAines innum. All ntccfrirr enrrAtick onittcf• titnorialt of cltarreter may he addrettaine ±Salrb fjetdulr.F• ll l. No!l ;ta i near Bohan; 9r, tlic key. 'llionoro The day of - EL:akin "I'Larfday, the . 2:h of July next, tut ten o'clock io the forenoon. ildier,o, 3:it May, r4S:a. WtiEN NrWifMiuu.tl Alen Of ittiu4atKirc 4rt4 froakility deviato Erna the vslerel.flitetn by the fe edion or a lira.nch, the faMtibin 'of long tooth:ad uccefs is the heft crit,:rion of fupertoritf. Eight year: have I davo;i:d Illy predict to the eaclufi ve szer. mutt of THREE; DISORDERS, and the racceesful refill: of my plan gives me additional ardour to oppofe ea fares as able the ravages of tht4enaiplatius %shish ere th: Mort ininigt* ant in the catalogue of human infirmitii.s. After initiation Mtn ef.ll7.hra,,Ct as •an Ar:ny Sorgeap, T formed a will 1/4111 early period of Praelice rtfcus ury i 3 aU ri trn the looratice of Imedricated Mn., or the equally chia ;Vino* preci?itailey of peneral Praelidoners. Tht.TlißtlE DISOiLDh.R.S, to the cure of which I have de voted my attention, comprize evi:Cy (pocks of V EN2REAL INFECTION, whether of a meat or long durattan i! kind, DEI;11.1 ry, w:u.tler arifing from the hanitt' SChtYIN , ly 4, or t:•e inilulgenceot mature sgc, and lattly that de rangement of the:sib:in in Women which 6 called 3AIU.Cii:- NESS or S'l - EitI6ITY. Numronis duCtics are the fault of ignorance or Italie In fiat treatment of a Single flonorrhea,anil it not unfrequently hay pens that the feeds of Lilt are potional by the ntlifertrion or an unguarded hour. Sy a inperior method fuck cootrUnt' re raiily cured, end even where others knee fafied, i trait stiaz may Rya:fume to zlfer a radical roeltablitlunint revr,liowever, are ritc,esfes of . Colflpiic4ted Mimi% In Os thforder compared with the ealaniitous tituatiene of Men.wit. from indulgence ina SOLITAR I V ICE, ortiic preYalniit C• me • ties of a faihionatile Lire, acquire that Rate of Dr!iiliry whits i; the unernidable c e of fuels pernicious Where the iieharipy fufferer Lroods over his milia c-rc I'o4- conceal. :As misfortuoc, it may be fcww, c hint to know, that akitnunh it be en cf doubt or uuces - fanny nit': other PraeHilener+, the reilinv.l of aide E I F.NCLLS by the progrelsoliZenovicien i, the i.eq.,-te meta of my experience. if the rites of ilacchos or lien lily begun to reduce manly vigour, meal: ancinty will be prey, - by , an early corint...radion of :his languid 'lam, sail Os •••• cafes no great (Uric ulties will occur. But where this Deficiency has for years ex Ceveranec is ir.dif uthu. y reviatL to revive , • of Lite, and to rear imate the Conftitull , si. MARRIED WOMEN, who have lose - In their expediations of a Famity, may lie :1:401.... 1 , O. .. initances lush defetts arc cut able by ti,lcheal The 3ECRICY which is fo .I!etltiat toner ulti,if +• E„ the (19 , ilificati ,, as wtlich I 1139 L prefemi•d to Ilan:, .h , Bab, of my Brit..tit - ion:, and In cainc:il :I: re with fueli thi• i matios if given, that Mr biay (or by letters inekning a (mall noti) at his lit ufe. No. 29, del-itreet, Strand, nom Tonplo-Bar. I!:ere is en ad.ilcional entrabce in Waist- itrect and the name ir on both the doors. R Merril , r , of rite C.oval C'lleae rf on• • for . Curt by JOHN 1 , A:•.. (of C.arnaby-ftra.z) atthc : 4 1" Alt P!ti IC I ics. :40 Carry-o.rect ; an. pa')lil,l by LEV! t. S. , NT tein:rv-plAce, L4t.bet!'). No t. Carry-ft nr... • S: Ax-Orris. T gnple-Bar ; tn which Ofrwe anus for tbe Est r Da are requcitc•lsto be addreCva. f