Star. — London, England, 1818-03-04 00:00:00

• A :, mom i . P . . •.• ." The Regular i , , BZOODI The : seemed 1 The Gaoling pointed , of certa . &c. wk . • • Layne( front inl . Also, , N .«. Bitten, cases, a • !lament # Also, . , . . to act tu Earl VT3i ml CMOIIIII I ' 4 3 ' • rio T n, at he course c arrange] Laving ] The caveni some re 3 lion of t non to 1 The not prer view m doubt 1 mence ; The parishes Climne V thr Toy Some 1 the Ka • future 1 which, able Intl Commi deratior 'louse i . Lord A on all a more, I The, the sect; sure to Thursdl On tl before t . Court 3 eith3:eb The: yesterd; tested a and zed 3 Viset 1 fa City 1 h'sded rz.pect f . Lor spivinj 1 , ...ngt1r staterr i explar subjec 11" _ ration l II ' that i princii nothin sider t of the F rovisi demni much appeal the kit not on discha forcibl which these ! been charge been, proses all hi! q•ler.ci ' t 1 The what 1 • a legi He arl cial ar prutec access; exited , 1 , that tl elisclo! i I•csee] tßok F those I kind F ) those I preced Mon h what give a the po The the r... - On of the w ith r ir.g cl Lor • was 1 CG1.11,1 In I clann ml )i to pre nity, to kni on a coroll Act !el • be an the II fore n r it 4th 1 . nuary ; • . Tin 0 merit, be gir ' appeal , the ex ~ • • . . to sus] ,f • I PAdZLIAMENTARY PROCEEDING 4. HOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH 3. The Annual Indemnity Bill and the Kilmainham Hospital Regulation Bill, were brought up from the Commons by Mr. BAIMIDEN and others, and read the first time. The Bank Token Penalty Suspension Bill was read a first and wooed time. The LORD CHANCELLOR notified to the House, that Geolot Ilisav Rosa, Esq. Clerk of the Parßanients, h ad ap pointed BMW Coons, Rig. his Deputy, for the performance of certain acts, as the signature of particular papers, documents, &c. which were more specifically adverted to by the Noble and Learned Lord; and also certain other acts, incase of his absence from indisposition, Ste. Also, that the said Mr. Ross had appointed Joint WILLIAM Buten, Esq. to act in the absence of Mr. Cowers in certain cases, and to sit as Assistant Second Deputy Clerk of the Par liaments. Also, that Mr. Ross had appointed B/DUAMM/ CLIRRIT, Esq. act as Second Clerk Assistant, as occasion may require. Earl GROSVENOR inquired, across the table, whether it was meant to propose any regulation with respect to the fees, or emoluments, of the office of Clerk of the Parliament. The Earl of LIVERPOOL observed, that it was his inten tion, as he had stated on a former occasion, to propose, in the course of the present Session, some legislative regulations for the arrangement of the office in question, but prospectively, and having a regard to the existing itterosts. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE adverted to the very great :aavenience which would result to Noble Lords, if prospectively some regulation were adopted for having some official specifica tion of the business fixed for each day ; and intimated his inten tion to submit some motion on the subject. The Earl of LIVERPOOL hoped the Noble Marquis would not press any specific motion on that subject, as the object in view may be better effected in another way; and he had no doubt some mode may be suggested for obviating the inconve nience alluded to by the Noble Marquis. The Duke of SUSSEX presented a Petition from certain mrlshes in the Metropolis, or its adjuncts, in favour of the 17.1iimney-sweepers' BiU; as did the Marquis CAMDEN one from sr Town of Chelmsford. Some conversation took place between Lord AMIE/AIM and the EA., of LAUDERDALE and Lummox, on the subject of the iture progress of the Chimney-sweepers' Bill; in the course of the Noble Minister expressed his wish that a consider able interval may take place between the second reading and the. Committee on the Dill, in order to afford time fur a due con,i &ration of the allegations of the Petitions, and to enable the House to give a then ough consideration to the subject in general. Lord Auckland, who seemed inclined to move the second reading on an early day, adverted to the Report sent up by the Com mons, as coutairing adequate information on the subject. The Marquis of L A NSDOW NE stated his intention to move the second reading of the Jail Chaplains' Salaries Bill (a mea sure to which he thought there was no serious objection), en Thursday nest. On the motion of the LORD CHANCELLOR, the Account before the House of the number of Recognixances filed in the Court of King's Bench for appearance upon certain charges, tithtY by Information or in lictment, was ordered to be printed. The Earl of CARNARVON, in pursuance of his notice of yesterday, moved for an account of the number of Persons at rested and detained upon charges of being concerned in illegal and seditious meetings; which was ordered accordingly. Viscount SIDMOUTH observed, that he would afford every i.:Dity in his powtr towards the desired production; but appre i•nded that his office would afford Wilt little information with ~.tdpect to thu Noble Earl's motion. - - - INDENISITY BILL. Lord HOLLAND,.previous to their Lordships' re ,Diving Into a Committee on the Bill, spoke at some length on the suhject, and in reference chiefly to the statements in the preamble of the Bill, thought some explanation was necessary, as in his then view of the subject, he deemed some of the enactments not only various but contradictory. These seemed to imply that illegal acts had been committed, though the Irincipal supporters of the measure alledged that nothing illegal had been done. If they were to con .ider the Bill of Indemnity as naturally flowing out of the Suspension Act, then he thought the leading -rovisions of that Act should be recited in•the In demnity Bill. As it stood, he certainly entertained much difficulty and doubt on the subject; the Bill •ippeared to differ not only from former measures of the kind, but that of 1801. Indemnity was provided not only for committing and detaining, but even for discharging. There were some considerations which forcibly struck him in the way of query, and of which he wished for a solution. The principal of these seemed to be, whether an individual who had been arrested and detained, and subsequently dis -.harged in the way that several of these recently had )een, was recently exempted thereby from future prosecution, or was placed in the full enjoyment of all his legal rights as a British subject, in conse vler.ce of such discharge. The LORD CHANCELLOR, in consequence of .Lat had fallen from the Noble Lord, entered into a legal view of the points adverted to at some length. He argued most ably for the necessity, on the spe• ial and extraordinary circumstances of the case, of rotecting the Magistrates and all those who had iecessarily acted under the authority which recently :Aisted for the safety of the State; and above all, ''.at the sources of their information should not be i:sclosed. With respect to the doubts entertained, ..to seemed of opinion, that the proceedings which took place in the Court of King s Bench went on those juridical principles on which all cases of the kind proceeded; and tithe Judges of that Court, on those occasions, had acted illegally, all those who )receded them had so acted. This was the best opi nion he could at that time give, upon his view of what was referred to, and he should be ready to give any further information in his power respecting tLe points. Their Lordships then resolved into the Committee, the Earl of SISAFTESBURY in the Chair. _ On the question of postponing the consideration of the preamble, which in this case was proposed • ith reference to its connexion with the next enact- ing clause, to be forthwith considered, lord GRENVILLE gave his opinion that there was no necessity for departing from the ordinary -mrsc of proceeding in this case. In the result, the preamble, was postponed. The :louses being entered upon, The Earl of LAUDERDALE said, he intended co propose an Amendment to the date of the Indem nit'', being the Ist of January, 1817. He wished zo know how the Noble and Learned Lord should, on a former night, have said that this Bill was a corollary on the Suspension Act, when the latter Act was passed on the sth of March ? This would be an indemnity for actions cOmitted long before the Habeas Corpus Act was suspended. He there fore moved, as an amendment, to insert the words “ 4th of March, 1817," instead of the Ist 'of Ja wary, 1817. The Earl of LIVERPOOL opposed the amend ment, because some. retrospective indemnity should be given in all eases where persons might have been apprehended for 'practices against the State, upon the expectation that Parliament would pass an Act to suspend the Habeas Corpus. It might be rccol- lected, that on the Ist day of the meeting of Parlia ment la.st Session, a very daring outrage had been committed against the person of the Regent ; he therefore had no objection to this Act betag dated from the 26th of January, 1817, the day before the meeting of Parliament. Lord LIVERPOOL'S Amendment was then agreed to nem. dia. On the ses.and clause being read, Lord HOLLAND said, he intended is move that the word " discharged" should be left out ; but he would not press that amendment, after the explana tion given by the Lord. Chancellor. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that under the circumstances of this Bill, the word " discharged" was most material ; because in some instances the Magistrates may have irregularly discharged some of the persons who were apprehended. Lord HOLLAND said, that neither the Lord Chancellor nor Lord Liverpool had explained what the situation of those persons was, who had fius been irregularly discharged. He had no objection to give an Indemnity to the Magistrates ; but he wished to know whether these persons so discharged would be restored to their rights as if they had been discharged by due courses of law. Lord ERSKINE thought, it would he very easy to propose a short provision, declaring all such per sons restore I to the rights they would have been en titled to had they been liseharned in a legal manner. The Earl of LAUDERDALE remin led the House in what situation it would have been had it a treed first to the preamble, which declared that no one had been arrested illegally. The LORD CHANCELLOR said this clause was to be considered with respect to three parties, t .e in dividuals, the Magistrates, and the Ministers of the Crown; and if a clause with that view should b.! pro posed, it would be received. Lord lIOLLAND withdrew his amendm! it. Lord LAUDERDALE moved to insert, after the word 4 , practices," the words 44 not relatin to the case."—The amendment was agreed to, ne . The Marquis of LAN SDOWN said he was sure there was not a Magistrate who would tof justify his conduct openly in a Court of Law, r Cher than by the protection of an Indemnity Bill, i he could do it with safety to the State., He there ore moved, that the part of the clause granting iudemnity to other than those who acted limn St ite necessity, should be left out. _ _ _ The LORD CHANCELLOR considered this the most important part of the Bill. At Manchester ten or twelve thousand men were stopped by the Magis trates, on their way to London; and would the Howe expo; the Magistrates to actions brought against them by ten or t elve thousand persons? Besides,' the Magistrates might have secret information of these persons intentions, which they could so more disclose with safety to the State than the Ministers of the Crown could. The Marquis of LANSD3WN said, that as the number arrested was very small, the Magistrates could not have a great marl actions to fear. The Earl of LIVERPOJL said, that in one place alone 200 persons were ta'cen up, and great numbers in other places. Lord HOLLAND contended, that if protection of this kind were to be afforded to the Magistrates, there would not be a tumult put down by the Magistrates which the latter would not expect an Indemnity Bill for; and that was a doctrine which he must protest against, as subversive of the law. The Marquis of LANSDOWVS amendment was nc. gatived without a division. Lord EItSKINE felt as much as any ore the ne cessity of protecting the Magistrates. In order to do substantial justice, he proposed a proviso, " that nothing in this Act should extend to any persons' who may have exercised their authority maliciously." Many acts of oppression might have been maliciously committed against individuals by Magistrates and others, under the sanction of the late Act, without any information, and for which the offending parties' ought to be puniilied. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that if the House were to adopt this proviso, it would undo all it had already time. If they did not choose to pass a Bill of Indemnity, let them say so, and not, by a side blow like this, destroy the whole measure. It was not only necessary to protect the Magistrates from vexatious prosecutions, but also from their being brought against them in such numbers as to be quite destructive to any man. The Earl of ROSSLYN said, the Amendment of his Noble and Learned Friend did net apply so muck to the Magistrates as it did to Constables and other:, who have been guilty of illegal and malicious arrests. Lord ERSKINE'S amendment was then negativ:d without a *division. The Marquis of LANSDOWN objected to the word " Ireland," as it was not included in the Su. pension Bill. Lord SIDMOIJTH said, the extension of this Bill to Ireland was necessary, on account of the special case of one man, who was apprehended in that c =- try for practices of a suspicious nature in Engla id. Lord HOLLAND said, this was a very pretty co rollary on the Suspension Act indeed. Thit Act was expressly not extended to Ireland ; yet there was a clause introduced, without any special case having been laid before Parliament, in order to justify the introduction of it. This clause, for aught he knew, might deprive the people of Ireland of their legal rights against their oppressors. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, this clause did not at all apply in the manner stated by the Noble Lord. There was no secret in the case alluded to: it was that of one Benbow, who escaped to Ireland, and was there apprehended. The clause might have been more unexceptionable had the words " Great Britain" been inserted in the first clause. The Marquis of LANSDOWN submitted that a Clause should be brought in to meet this special case. He moved to introduce the words " Great Britain." Lord LIVERPOOL had no objection to that being done on the Report on the third reading, as it was never intended that this Bill should extend to Ireland. Lord HOLLAND thought it would be better to introduce a special clause, or even a new Bill, to meet this special case. The LORD CHANCELLOR suggested, that a proviso might, at a future stage, be introduced, to take the case of any person arrested in Irelar.d. The word " Ireland" was then left out; and 64 Great Britain" substituted. The Earl of CAERNARVON proposed an amend- mem, to prevent persons from being subject to double costs, who have alreutly brought actioas. The LORD CHANCELLOIbproposed a clause to that effect, in cases only where the actions have been withdrawn; which was agreed to. The Earl of CAERNARVON said, this Bill was one of strong necessity, or an expediency bordering oft necessity. To make it like the preamble, he moved an amendment, that a clause should be added, that when an action is to be brought against any in dividual, notice shall be given to the Secretary of State by the Solicitor for the party ; and if in a month after that notice, the Secretary of State shall not make oath before a Judge that the evidence to be produced would be dangerous, then the action shall be suffered to go on. This clause he considered as necessary to prevent the doors of Courts of Justice from being entirely shut against the people. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, this clause, if adopted, would reduce the Magistrates, against whom actions might be brought, to be quesuoaed by the Secretary of State, whether they would choose to have the actions go en or n It. In a case of such difficulty, he was sure the House cou'd not adopt a better measure than that proposed to it. Lord CAERNARVON would not divide the Com m' ace on this clause, but he would move it again in a future stage.--The clause was then rejected. Lerti ItOSSLYN moved an Amendment in the pre amble, to recite the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act. The LORD CHANCELLOR could not agree to that Amendment, as the Magistrates had, in many cases, been obliged to act, in the suppression of con spiracies,, under other Powers than those given by the habeas Corpus Suspension Act.—The Amend ment was negatived. Lord LAUDERDALE moved to amend the pre amble, by introducing the words of the Report of the Secret Committee, that " wherea; an insurrection, of small importance in itself, broke out in Notting hamshire," 8-x.—This Amendment Was also nega tived without a division. Lord LAUDERDALE then moved, that after the words " assembled in great numbers," should be in serted, " as would have endangered the public peace, and would have spread terior and alarm among his Majesty's liege subjects, if they had not been speedily dispersed."—This Amendment was also negatived. The LORD CHANCELLOR then moved several verbal Amendments to the preamble which were agreed to. He also moved to insert in ' the preamble, that " whereas some of the acts done might not be entirely justifiable in law, this is to save them harm less," &c. ; which was also agreed-to. The Bill then went through the Committee, was rt?orted, and ordered to he read a third time on Thursday.—Adjourned at Half-past Ten. HOUSE OF COMMONS. A Person from the British Museum presented certain Ac counts relative to the Books received last year from Stationers' Hall; which was ordered to be printed, POOR'S RATES. Mr. LUSHINGTON having presented a variety of Papets relative to the Poor's Rates, being chiefly the Retffrns of Sums collected for this purpose in different District*, _ _ _ Mr. D. GILBERT, on moving that these Papers be printed. expressed his opinion that unless the evil of regulations that now existed were done away, or brought at least within some limits, it could.not fail to be_the ruin of the country. The Committee, how ever, which had sat last Session, had been so indefa tigable in their labours, that he trusted the subject they had investigated would meet the deepest atten tion, and the result be generally satisfactory. Sir CHARLES MONCK was certain the country would not be satisfied unless his Majesty's Govern ment came forward, and fairly and radically remov ed the evil. Mr. CALCRATT did not wish to deny that the Poor's Rates were an evil ; but he did not see how it was in the power of his Majesty's Government to re move it. If the Honourable Gentleman were sincere in his wish, and he had no reason to doubt his sin cerity, let him bring in a Bill to remedy the evil, that it might be seen what means he would propose. But the fact was, that the real evil of pauperism and consequent poor's rates arose chiefly from excessive taxation. These rates had reached their highest point, and were now gradually declining, so that we should soon have no occasion to alter • a s) stem that had been established for ages, and been productive of so much benefit. But Gentlemen might in a great de gree thank themselves for the height which the evil had attained. They would have a Corn Bill, and Country Bank Paper, and yet they wanted a low price of labour and moderate poor rates. The things were inconsistent ; for if they will have a high price for corn, there must be high poor rates, as the wages of labour were not sufficient for the support of hu man existence, and both labourers and their families must eat. He cared not, however, of what price corn was, so that proper support could be found for the labourer. But he would be one of those who would never set his face against the Act of Elizabeth. Sir CHARLES MONCK wished it to be under stood that it was against the abuse of the Poor Laws that he had spoken, and not against any part of the Act which provides support for the aged and infirm. Mr. F. LEWIS hoped that on so important a sub ject there would not be a premature discussion, of any thing said that might be misunderstood and create alarm. Too much praise could not be given to the labours of the Committee ; but he was afraid they Would incur the imputation of blame for over caution, though he would rather they should be blamed for this than for precipitation. Ile hoped the House would set themselves against the system with all its abuses, but not let it be entertained that the rebel' at present afforded was intended to be, withdrawn. It was impossible, he thought, that any person could entertain such an idea. lie would say there was impending danger to the country from the gradual increase in the number of paupers, who would sooner or later absorb all the profits of the land, and therefore he hoped the House would pre. serve the country from ruin as well as the paupers I themselves. He trusted the subject would be brought gradually before the House, and undergo full and complete discussion ; but he would say that this country would have been incomparably happier if the Act of Elizabeth had never passed, and the la bouring classes in particular would have been much better off. There was nothing he was less anxious to see than high price of land and low price of labour, but if there were any thing that lie' was most au ious to see removed, it was low wages, whi c h 0 1. 1 labouring classes to throw themselves on tax p„l' This was caused by the detestable system of labourers out of the Poor's Rates. The far them sixpence a day, and made them cal amount of eighteen or nineteen shillings a s the parish. There was besides a most tem of manufacturing goods, to he sent sale, at prices below what they could eve n for, because a part of the cost was paid by in the shape of Poor Rates, while the land benefit from the traffic. He entreated the H, to be led away by the view that taratien cause of the number of paupers and higi Nothing was more fallacious than that ta' effected the amount of paupers, or the stn for their support--(//ear, hear). He di assertion altogether— (Lord cheeri ng ). \l urged was, that persons were so impoye r i, taxation, that they were unable to pay a for labour. But taxation only altered the expenditure. If the persons who paid the money to spend, instead of distributing the hands of Government, there would 1 greater number of paupers than there are. sent the money raised by taxes went to eat diers and sailors, and to pay for the makini der, the building and repairing of ships, al various articles of national stores. Th us seen that Government, by means of taxation much greater employers of labour than if did not exist. Even persons who lived by th of money in the Stocks, employed more hi if they derived their income by lest direct tain means. When the distress of the ex , ' been so much discussed, it was urged that cipal cause of it was, that Government I drawn itself from the market. And how vernment employ labour at all, either i: war, but for taxation ? He did not mean , a great deal of money had net been ssr away ; but this was a minor point, and the that taxation only tended to change the lan., which the money passed, instead of chef minishing the quantity of labour. Mr. BROUGHAM )regretted that the Hi Gentleman bad not kept his promise of cc prematurely into a discussion of this imp ject. He had thought fit to enter into thi he had exhausted it, as far perhaps as roll he had to say upon it ; and then he brx into the benefits of taxation—(Laughter, hear).—On this point he had favoured with the discovery, that taxation, howev tied, had no effect in increasing ;he numb pen; that where a person paid 1.0001. made no difference whether that 1,0001. to give to a sinecure Lord of the Admiral out in the employment of a numLer of ; (Laaghter).—He pledged himself again every pan of such opinions, and he well: pledge himself to chew that there never wa position more fallacious or more dangere litved ; and that this falsehood was as de' as the self-evident nature of his last di.cc Mr. faILNKLAND LEWIS explaine, net appear to be a self-evident proposition number of paupers was occasioned by ura Mr. BROMHAM replied, that he haci such an opinion had ever been entertabed. Mr. CALCRAFT denied that he 1..4 c' to say that the number of paupers was b . 7 taxation, but only that this was a princ thent towards it: .••• • Mr. CURWEN said the great object .17 the mode of receiving the rates, without never could restore the poor to their form( dente. There was note labourer in the cc did not pay a twenty-fifth part of his wap alone.—The papers were ordered to be POLICE REPORT. Mr. HOME SUMNER presented a Pe the Magistrates of the Epsom Division. a of having been calumniated by the evidl the Police Committee. It prayed for b their conductrespecting the licensing of pul After a short conversation between Mr. Lord L....sautes, Mr. HOME SUMNER, TMORYEON, in the course of which ma: ments were paid to the Petitioners, and served by Mr. BENNET, that certain passa Report were in no degree directed against Petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr. BENNET said be had a Petition from a person who had been most cruelly in consequence of the Suspension of the pus Act, but from the undue and scandal( which certain Country Magistrates had ex, der the authority of the Circular Letter tr by the Noble Secretary of State. He was tisfied that it was not the intention of the N that such cruelties should be exercised, as such to which the country was unaccusta Petition was from Jonathan . Buckley, 1 r! small bookseller's and pamphlet shop at V; where having sold i copy of the " printed in London, he was seized by Magistrates, handcuffed, and confined se in irons. Meanwhile his house was sear though not another copy of the parodies found in it, a number of histor.cal an, books were carried away, several of shit been returned. The Quarter Sessions bei+ was confined sixteen weeks, and taken ti Sessions in a cart, ironed, and in compa, lons. During this time his wife and fame , duced to ruin, and obliged to receive assn the parish. The Honourable Gentleman mented on the different treatment receives who was the original publisher, and who committed to the King's Bench. Ile to that he had another Petition to present son similarly circumstanced. It was fix Billing, of Warrington, who had been t the same time, and after being confined was assaulted by the turnkey, who gave black eyes...—The Petitions were severally I prayed the House, in its wisdom, to take for preventing the recurrence of, such true On the question for their lying on the table Mr—BENNET said he wished to ask the General whether, as these unfortunate pc: stood on their own recognizances, he me, them forward at the next Sessions ? The ArTtIRNEY-GENER AL thought be Kiant mistake. Their recoaMhAav=a .sit anoth Pet , In he 1 blic; hat 'Gestic i ffe becal It rem • a mose 11 r o to 2PP P2 ot , rater,'' Lake to tiom a :v „.. ! it;rieektts, m f b ec o ' Y ' q be r l i l es a n r : eci d ° E df t i t: e i ; , whether 11 :n • those p tile' ,ree aegni e aps?, e A.TTOI Rorie °a *va give an ansv gh barge the I 416 03' have pub] me t .0115 libels a • der. , he sh , 111 14 . was anoth erica duty IS to a l i , p - use the pei ; libels in ch r4 _f o r het tu t • 1t E ,ch public; 3i be r. diff er ent Ju 41 e k . s uch publi • eel* •. ~ to have one publ and 4.. . to make it rat es who has the questic (Rh if ..er of diffe the • . fled. becal halide , libels, an' .- :t and .. There an L c weighed he it ed, that al t . 14; 1 . • licaticms w cola did it foil , i'.gs in delta t 4 su ne, and ev *c. disgustin to be de, le nds .r inst rcligii ed to be ac 'cation in Ho^. bstain fro act been acqu loran: ]could do i le t Honourabl alesr..;i: u had certa iorari into 'nista , Lai ow not think the H l to let hirr wer he had bra be of r. as.;.,"re : lire, '' t icy y et o h L f e d h r e c i T l d a i Bess princip.: • aa; t ought ut if he - had Ad d have fel vas ass ds correc ems the verdicts :moil ht contain werv. ~ ons were tr the Govern] ) n, that . dime men *. • • UCCIOrIf mi tee nst them, ieved the of ever ^ . .er to aggr orred state tionally 1-1( r. t2z_ the lader t d, he cook ler :11'r rthy, and • s us considers ix - Ir. BROU 'end in his sting put . e any rem :einp:-7 had been or knee:, ces of th e i . iNtry bound to • y had no c Er. B y might ha. t, asz considere any c: that if ten it v•,o. oduced, if ;373 c • r side oft] sat ti=,' • - cutions. ' cause of r es toFe. •rs did, by ly a:.- . ation of a Hat.'..". such prose rable Gent ch he cons travi which vs 'site and N::: ch were c s t]lnF • .nage of t go:j. no pros; rl:r i rat e ast the p< wished tl cal at all time rde d CASI seTtri'' 'ns - t °b s th er e d vai meats upc • ing Jurie ing of ani rd more fa to t.e a Jury, a e questioi r verdict doctrine I a t:L 3 C ft tranquilli e j by HA it could ir < c 4 f r oil e te2kree2Eh me :::l2l;:l 4_ ?..::FeA.:: '..S.PcetitanurNhrtkcHnieY:ltionami Honour take: 11 1 o n Num' ; l ei cc; those who 11 ::kr. , io for the pt ion from 1 l wrsas z o f thoi 14 „,, u: t o c 'eman ha • 44 dresse. t thee° . to th ose c l LAI s ' ). •by their c;