Star. — London, England, 1825-06-22 00:00:00

,~ ... .. . . . stdirE MILICT OF • IItiFATCII FROM 1.1111170411F15a1. 111 a aossovismax as 0 6 -14 inmooLes &CM. Isags aaterniar, SAUD antastrias, Iran tans VOYOKIIII, lel4. " I am happy in assuring your Lordship that I have every reason to think that the introduction of Slaves into the Mauritius bas entirely ceased. "" It is possible that a few may still be taken to the Seychelles from the A &icon coast,but this cal§ neither be well ascertained, nor prevented, until a small armed vessel shall be constantly stationed at that dependency, for the express purpose of cruising amongst the several islands. All Slaves, however, brought here from the Seychelles, are subjected to the established formalities; and unless they correspond with their original recense meat, they are not admitted. is but justice to tl.e inhabitants to say, that as far as I can judge, I perceive no disposition whatever on their parts to renew the traffic in Slaves; but rather a feeling in condemnation of. the horrors incident to this trade, seems to be gaining ground." PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE 01? LORDS, MU 21. APPEALS. In Duncan s. the Lord Advocate of Scotland • Auchter c iony v. Officers of State of Scotland; Young and Co. v. R amsay, the inter locutors of the Court of Session affirmed. In Jeffrey v. Ure • Magistrates of Montrose 'v. Ewing ;-and John Graham, W.S. v. the Beeper and Commissioners for the Society of Writers to the Signet, and their Treasurer and Procurator Pls• cal, the interlocutors of the Court of Session reversed. In the I .at case it was so decreed on the single ground that the respond ents did mt sue in the character of a " Corporation," but merely in the names above characterised, individtially. In Pearson v. Jack, Counsel were fully beard. Mr. Batman and others, from the Commons, brought up the Western Ship Canal Bill, and several Private all,, which were read a firot time. They also brought a Message, stating that the Commons had given leaveto Mr. Dominick Browne to attend their Lordships' Committee oh the State of Ireland. Mr. THORN TON, from the Directors of the East India Company, presented a Copy of the Case laid before his Majesty's Attorney- General and Solicitor-General, In the year 1522, relative to the 39th section of the 13th of George 111. entitled an Act for the better regulation of Loans in India, with the opinion of the Attor ney and Solicitor-General thereupon.—Laid on the table. The Marquis of HASTINGS said, that these Papers having been laid before the House, there was no further occasion for de lay. He therefore gave notice, that he should move to-morrow, the second reading of his Bill to amend the 13th of George 111. and moved that the Judges be summoned.—Ordered. Mr. ITARRI4O2I having been heard a considerable time at the Bar in support of the Sullivan Divorce Dill. A conversation ensued, in which the Loan CIIMICILLOA, the Earls of LAUDERDALR and Dower, and Lord Bauer, took part, 'het which the Bill was read a second time. QUARANTINE LAWS. The Earl of LIVERPOOL moved the Order of the Day for reading the. Quarantine Laws Ament:ment Bill a second time. Earl DAItNLEY did not rise to oppose the Bill. On the contrary, he admitted that some of the Quarantine regulations were oppressive and required to be altered. Neither should lie call their Lordships' attention to its details, although he wished that it were made impera tive that cotton coming from Turkey or Egypt should be taken out and ailed for a sufficient time before finally admitted. The only clause to which he shokild draw their Lordships' notice, would be that which gave ' or continued a discretionary power to the Privy Court ell to extend the quarantine of ships, or to dispense with it altogether. He objected to this power, because he contended that of late it had beets much abused. The circumstances had reached him, in consequence of his residence being near the Medway. He understood that vessels laden with cotton had been admitted in the River, without undergoing any quarantine or any air ing whatever, although they had come directly from Egypt, which was the focus of the plague. If it were granted, as he conceived it must be, that the plague was contagious and might Is: shut up in cotton pack ages, it was most extraordinary that those vessels had been so admitted. He had inquired into the subject snore generally, and had found that in 1819 a Com mittee of the House of Commons had been engaged in an investigation to ascertain whether the plague were contagious or not ? The opinion that it was only epi demic had first been broached by a Learned Gentle man, of whom his Noble Friend (Lord King) had lately becomh a disciple. The Committee were of a different opinion, and consequently did not advise that any change should be made in the law. Another Com mittee, however, which sat last year on Foreign Trade, had recommended that a considerable alteration should be made in the Quarantine regulations, and it was on that recommendation that the present Bill was founded. With respect to the vessels to which he had alluded, it was true that they had clean bills of health ; but any one acquainted with the state of the Consulates in the Levant, knew that it was not very difficult there to obtain dean bills of,health.— If it were true, therefore, that the plague was contagious, it was extremely hazardous on the part of his Majesty's Government to act as they bad done. The Noble Earl then alluded to the restric tions which had been laid in souse foreign ports upon Mash vessels, in consequence of the alarm produced by the reported change of our Quarantine Laws. He refitted the doctrine of Dr. Maclean, that the plague was not contagious, and read several passages of Sir T. Maitland': dispatch from Corfu, to chew that the plague ' was caught by contact and not by infection. He then called upon their Lordships to put an extinguisher upon opinions which, if adopted, might lead to public danger. The Earl of LIVERPOOL should say but little, as there was no opposition to the Bill, and that little should be confined to explaining its objects. The attention of his Majesty's Government had been attracted to the sub ject by the solicitations of the British Merchants trading with those parts of the world where the plague was a frequent visitor, to revise and alter our Quarantine Laws. Their Lordships were, no doubt, aware that the Levant Merchants of some countries, of Holland, in particular, had a great advantage over ours. This arose entirely • from the superior mildness of their. Quarantine Itegula. tions. It was true that the Committee of last year felt disposed to adopt the opinion that the plague was not contagious. On the contrary, it had admitted the whole -doctrine laid down by the Committee of 1819, and the May question had been, not whether security was re,. quired, but what kind of security should be afforded? and the feeling had been and still was, that it was the ditty of his Majesty's Government and of Parliament, if they committed any error, to err on the side of safety. It had• been thought necessary at the same time to give our commerce the benefit of a relaxation of our Qua iu L which were very severe. What then were made no alteratiOn what lotions, but justly vested the "ing in Council. But even in their extent, and so even of those who thought The two great objects to conditions of a wholly AW passed in 1805, the el borne by the ships which operation. This appeared ranting Laws, which were very the principles of the Bill ? It r ever in the Quarantine Regulati right to make them in the Rini then they were very limited framed as to meet the opinioni e that the plague was infectious. of the Bill, in fact, related to different nature.- By the law penses of Quarantine were bo were obliged to undergo its en • to be a heavy pvimsure upon trade; for as Quarantinel was not imposed for its benefit, but for that of the coot - ' try, it seemed jest that the aspens* should be borne by the public. This was provided for by the present Sill, end formed the first great and real alteration from the ancient system. The second related to the penalties hitherto inflicted. They were so severe, that in some cases it was impossible to enforce them.— It was now proposed to mitigate theta so olesiderahly as to render their enforcement practicable. Them were the only alterations made in the law. He admitted that some alarm bad been excited, but this would not have been thus case bad those alterations been properly understood. This was one inconvenience which arose out of the very source of the greatest advantages which we possessed in this country—free dist-uvulas. For bad it not been for the pub lication of reports of what had been immaturely said on a measure of which the nature was not known, that unfounded alarm had not existed in several places abroad. The Noble Earl then restated, that when the benefit of trade, or the safety or the nation were in the balance, his Majesty's Government could not hesitate to err, if they did err, on the side of safety. Lord KING said, that Ins Noble Friend (Earl Darn ley) was himself the great alarmist, and had endea- , Toured to set up in chorus the cry of contagion. He (Lord King) contended that the plague could not be contagious, since it was well known that when it ceased, it ceased suddenly at its greatest height, and when, if it were contagious, it must necessarily spread itself stiU more widely, instead of disappearing. He wondered that his Noble Friend should not have felt as much anxiety at the repeal of the laws against witchcraft, as he did on the present occasion, for there was fully as much evidence to prove the existence of witch. craft, as there was to prove that the plague was contagious. It was all assumption. The BiU was then read a second time, and ordered to be com ' biltted to-morrow. The Earl of LIVERPOOL was then understood to give notice, that on Thursday next he should move the second reading of the Excise Duties Abolition Bill. and other Bills connected with Foreign Trade. The LORD CHANCELLOR gave notice that he should shortly propose, that after a day to hemmed, no further causes be heard, on purpose to give judgment on those which had been heard. 'he House hiving gone into a Committee on the County Courts Bill; "Midas objections were made by Lords Ettalmottoucx, Be nson...Ls, and CAWDOR, to some of its clauses. At the suggestion of the Lou) CHANCELLOR, the House resumed, and the Bill was ordered to be recommitted this day three months. The Mauritius Trade Bill, and the Irish Currency Assimilation Bill, went respectively through Committees, and were reported. Lord BEXLEY presented a Petition from the Merchants of Belfast, in favour of the Western Ship Canal MlL—Laid on the tables—Adjourned at HOLI•TAST SILVIO O'CLOCK. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Counsel were beard on Moore's Divorce Bill. The Holyhead Road Bill was read a third time and passed. The Foundlings of Ireland Bill went through a Committee on the motion of Mr. S. Rms.—Report to be received to-morrow. The LORD ADVOCATE brought up the Report on the Partnerships in Scotland Bill.—The Bill was ordered to be read a third time to morrow. Mr. %V. DUNDAS brought up the Report on the Edinburgh Bonds Bill. After a few words from Mr. ABIUMODUT, the Report was agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. On the motion of Mr. Heating, the Bank Tokens of Ireland Bill was read a third time and passed. Dr. PHILLIMORE brought up the Report of the Writs of Error 8111, which was read, agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. On the motion of Mr. Secretary PEEL, the University Pollee Bill was read a third time and passed. MR. KINRICK'S CASE Mr. DENMAN gave notice of a motion, requiring the attendance of four or five persons to be examined with regard to a letter written by Mr. Kenrick (the Welsh Judge), relating to the case of John Franks, which letter was published in the Stamford Paper, and a copy of which had been laid upon the table. That letter was grossly libelous on the character of John Franks. Mr. Kenrick had been guilty of peat malver sation in his office, and of great cruelty towards Mr. Franks. He had equally misconducted himself towards Camfor, from whom he (Mr. Denman) had already presented a Petition. It was certainly necessary to take away front Mr. Ken rick the power and dignity of a Magistrate of Surrey. For the bresent, he should merely move that the following persons attend on Friday next, at the bar of the House—John Franks and Esther his wife. Edward Arnold, Martin Money Camfor, and Peters. Mr.,Sectetary PEEL thought there would. be much siiffictety attending the motion. The ultimate object of the Learned Gentleman was to remove Mr. Kenrick from his office, and this preparatory motion bound the House to an inquiry. Would the House act so preci pitately? It would be better to wait until the letter was laid on the table. Let the Learned Gentleman embody on paper the grounds of his proceeding, and then the person accused might have an op portunity of replying to the charge. In the meantime he had better wait until all the papers were laid on the table. Mr. S. BOURNE thought the motion a great deal too precipi tate. Mr. Kenrick was entitled at least to as much favour as the meatiest person lo the kingdom. Mr. ABERCRO3I BY said, that the charge had already been made in such away as to enable Mr. Kenrick to give an answer. A Petition had been presented sgainst him, and an Hon. Member, la his behalf, had requested that the House would proceed to an :Luirinto the facts. No one could expect his Learned Friend to ce f his argument m writing, for that would be most injurious to Mr. Kenrick. Mr. Secretary Pan and Mr. S. Booms explained. - Mr. C. WYNN thought that the House slight to adhere to pre cedents, and to require that any charge against a Judge should be defined. Mr. TIERNEY said, that the charge was against Mr. Kenrick as a Magistrate and not as a Judge, and therefore less definiteness was necessary. inasmuch as all the facts were contained in Abe Petition.—Mr. C. WYNN explained. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said, that the House rarely ever addressed the Crown for the removal of a Judge ' • but when ever it did so. the charge was always specifically stated. The pre sent was a gross subversion of all the modes of criminal proceed ings. The House ought to be cautious in establishing a dan gerous precedent. Mr. ABEItCItOMBY explained and said, that the sole object of his Learned Friend was to substantiate by facts the allegations of the Petitioner. Mr. TIERNEY said, that the best way would be to call no wit nesses. except such as were connected with the Petition. If the enquiry were to be confined to Mr.Camfor's Petition, and no notice were taken of the affidavits and other papers on the table, the ob jection would be obviated. Mr. BROUGHAM said, that Hon. Members seemed to think that every inquiry into the conduct of a-Ma gistrate must end in an impeachment. This was not the case, and no charge in writing was necessary, except in cases of impeachment. There had been already too such motions made this Session ; one against the Duke of Manchester, and the other was fixed for tow morrow against Lord Charles Somerset, and yet tie one bad objected that they were not in writing. It was peeslbb that impeachments might be necessary, after the inquiries were over. Perhaps it would be more fair to confine the inquiry to the case of Camfor. From a long knowledge of Mr. Kenrick be could not bet express his hopes that that individual might Tree himself from all imputation. Still the House was bound to inquire, and ought not to be hampered. Mr. C. WYNN read extracts from the Journals, to prove that charges were required to be in writing when directed against Judges—Mr. BROUGHAM explained. Mr. Secretary PEEL said that his objection was to the insti tution of any inquiry in the case of Franks, before all the were laid on the table. After the papers were before the the would be able to decide as to the netessity of inquiry. r. DENMAN observed, that it was by mere acci ' dent that the letter of Mr. Kenrick had not been printed with the other papers. He was ready to admit that it would be premature to call any evidence respecting the case of Franks, and that part of the motion he begged leave to withdraw. The Petition of Camfor, however, contained specific matter of charge. He should therefore :nove l that Mark Money Camfor at tend the House on Friday ; and that the House resolve itself into a Corneal*e on that day. With regard to the ultimate effects of this inquiry, he could not say w hat measures he should adopt. An Address to the Crown erns the utmost limit of his proceedings there Crown w}} courses which might be adopted. He ought not,therefore, to be regarded as standing in the situation of an impeacher. Mr. tieennary PEEL thought it would be more consistent with justice to send a copy of Casnfor's Petition to Mr. Kenrick ; and on Friday move fur Cmfor's attendance, as in the meantime the accused might furnish a satisfactory explanation. Mr. DENMAN said, that no statement from an accused per son could be satisfactory. It was statement against statement.— ' Let the inquiry be made, and then let Mr. Kenrick be heard in his defence. Mr. Secretary Pm and Mr. Durmast mutually explained. r It was then moved and ordered, that the Petition of Mr. Camfor be communicated to Mr. Keuck that Camila . be ordered to attend the House on Frid ay; and also that Mr. Kenrick have I leave to attend at the same time in person, or by his Counsel. Mr. BROUGHAM thought the House ought to meet earlier than usual, in order to get sooner through the inquiry. Mr. Secretary PEEL concurred. Mr. DENMAN objected, on the ground of the probable short ness of the inquiry. Mr. MAXWELL presented a Petition, signed by 10,003 Ope ratite Weavers of Glasgow, respecting the Combination Laws. The Honourable Member supported the prayer of the Petition. Mr. Secretary PEEL said that the Committee had paid an equal attention to the statements of both masters and workmen. Mr. MAXWELL explained. The Petition was ordered to be laid on the table. UNITARIAN MARRIAUXII. Mr. W. SMITH presented a Petition from the Uni tarian Dissenters, paying for some relief. The Hon. Gentleman stated, that in consequence of a Bill which he had carried through the House having been thrown out in another place, the Unitatians had been placed in a worse condition than before. He thought it his duty to introduce the subject once more before the Legisla ture. He denied that at the time the Bill for relieving those persons who impugned the doctrine of the Trinity passed, that he admitted that those persons were only relieved from the statutary penalties, and were still left under the penalties of the common law. He never had admitted any such thing, and it so happened that he had a record of what he did say on that occasion. In his opinion, the whole of the penalties, both smtutable and under the common law, were done awry. Of that he had never heard any doubt expressed till lately by a Noble Person in the other House; if any doubts there really we, e remaining, it was very desirable they should be cleared up, and that was the object these Petitioners had in view. After a few words from Mr. Roses:sox, the Petition was read' and laid on the table. On the motion of the Cnancsatoa of the Engem:ea, the House went into a Committee on the Newspapers' Bill. The several clauses were agreed to, and the Report was ordered to be received tomorrow. The West India Clergy 13ill was read a third time, and a Clause added b) way of rider, for paying the salaries out of the Four and a Half per Cent. dutiei, after which the Bill was passed. The House went into a Committee on the Public Works in Ire land Bill.—Report to-morrow. The Glass Duties Bill was read a third time and passed. The Report on the Plate Duties Transfer Bill was received, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to.morrnw. The Customs Temporary Duties Bill was ordered to be read a third time on Friday. The Dublin Wide qtreets Bill went through the Committek.— Report to-morrow. The Customs Consolidation Bill was read a second doe, and committed for Thursday. The isle of Man Trade Bill was ordered to be read a third time on Thursday. The Piiiitige Bill was read a first time, and ordered to be read a second time to-morrow. CRUEL TRIATMCNT 01 ANIMALS. Mr. MARTIN moved the second reading of the Cruel Treat ment of Cattle Bill. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that the offence was already a felony, and the Bill of the Hon. Gentle man made it a misdemeanour ; so that the offence would at the same time be a felony and a misdemeanour. The Bill, in its present form, could not pass, and he must oppose it. Mr. R. MARTIN said, that the Bill he held in his hand was the Bill of Mr. Attorney-General. The At torney-General had no objections then to the Bill, pro vided the words cutting, maiming, or wounding, were inserted. The objection of the Right Hon. the Mem ber for Oxford, arose from his (Mr.M.) having adopted the suggestion of the Attorney-General, who promised to we his influence with the Lord Chancellor, to have the Bill passed. The Bill to which the Attorney-Ge neral assented was an absurd Bill-441 laugh). 0, so it was termed in the House of Lords. The present Bill went to cure that absurdity. The Attorney-General did assent and consent to the Bill that went up to the Lords : and he called on him either to admit the absur dity, or to consent to the Bill before the House. The Attorney-General had, in the course of the last 24 or 36 hours, told him (Mr. M.) that if one clause were left out, he had no objection to the passing of the Bill. If such objections were made, the public would be apt up think that the House of Commons was a very bad place far tie education of Gentlemen. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL repeated the objections whirl he had previously urged. Mr. It. MARTIN contended that the Bill of the Hon. Masi. ber for Knaresborough only applied to cattle which had owners. Mr. S. WORTLEY referred to the former Act, and said chalk applied to all cattle. Mr. C. WILSON thought the 'meet Bill might be . renderpd free from the objections of the Attorney-General by stating that it should not have the effect of repealing the former law, while it left the power of punishing minor offences as nsiadesseansniti. • ! Mr. GOULBURN opposed the Bill. • 4 After a few words from Mr. Menem and Mr. Swum Race, the house divided— For the motion • Against it It 27 -9 Majority against the Dill On the return of strangers to the gallery, • • Mr. GREEN was moving an Amendment to the Church Lands Baelianp Bill for leaving out that part wb.loh limited the quantfty of land to be exchanged to forty acres. Lord PALMERSTON objected to the Amendment. After a few words from Mr. Locusutair Mr. hlexcx, Mr. C. Wasson, and Mr. J. Raster, the Boum divided For the Amendment Against it Majority . The Report of the all was then received. SPRING GUN& On the question of the second reading of the Spring Gans 111, Mr. TENNISON opposed the Bill, on the ground that the offence might be punished by a civil action, and the injury was much greater than the law, if ap pealed to, could inflict, and often terminated in the death of the party. The Honourable Gentleman then stated several instances of melancholy accidents happening from spring guns, and sometimes to the parties themselves, in v►hose grounds they were set. The object of the Bill was to render it unlawful to set spring guns, and where death ensued within a year and a day after being wounded by such an instrument, the party setting seek gun should be deemed guilty of Manslaughter. The Honourable Gentleman concluded' by moving that the IRE be read a seeoad time. Mr. p. WORTLEY thought, that a great deal of properly in the kingdom could only be protected by 'the use of those instruments, which lie acknowledged, he had himself for years made u•e of. lie &mid bp. pose the second reading of the Bill, bec.iiise, liy every jaw of right, as well as by die law of the laud, he ha: . s 4. ' !• ' 1 . • a right to let spring pus for the protection of his property. If the Bill restricted the use of spring guns to the night time, be should net object to it. • Sir F. BURDETT said, poacher!, who were the per. sons against whom these guns were directed,were never hurt by them, while acccidents were continually hap'. penins to innocent peisonp. , Setting. spring-guns was effecting that Indirectly, which was not permitted to be done directly. The practice he thought inhuman ; for children, or persons taking t walk into the country for amusement, were liable to the loss of life by those instrunsenis. • He thought the greatest evil resulting from the use of spring guns, was allowing the u,e of ahem for the protection of game. If their use could keep the prisons clear of poachers, it might be a ques tion of choice between two evils ; but es it produced no such bene ficial result, be shou,ld support the second reading of the Bill. . Mr. COLBORNE was opposed to the. Bill, which would lead to a greater evil than that which it professed to remedy, as the number of gamekeepers must be en larged, atid continual conibats must take place between then and the ,posehers, which would lead to greater loss of life than that which could result from the use of spring pls. Mr. H. GURNEY supported the Bill. Lord BINNING was opposed to the second reading of the Bill, which was directed to the abolition of the use of spring guns for the protection of gardens as well as of game. He thought the Bill was a very bungling spe cimen of legislation, and he was surprised at such a Bill coming from a place which took such pains usually in criticising whatever was sent up from that House. Mr. SCARLETT supported the TENNISON re. pliedond the House divided, when there appeared— For the second reading, an I Against V, 27 I Majority,l2. The Gardena' Protection Bill was read a second be ,ommitted to-morrow. It was moved that the House should rvsolve itself into a Com mittee on the Assessors' Election Bill. Mr. HOBHOUSE opposed the motion, en the ground of the lateness of the Session. Mr. HORACE TWISS said, be had taken the earliest opporti thy for bringing the measure forward, but was prevented by the F eat prest of business from doing it sooner. He should, however, withdraw the Bill for the present Session, on the understanding that its should be permitted to bring It forward early in the next Session at Parliament.—Tbe motion was accordingly dropped. Every other Order tin the paperhating been previously disposed If, the House adjourami at lame o'Cuanc. '1111±; EVENING STAR LONDON. THURSDAY. JUNE 22, 1825. STOCK EXCHANGE, TWELVE O'CLOCK. Consols opened this morning at 911 1, and got up to lite 1 for the Account, with not much doing. They are now 91/. A good deal of business has been done this morning - in the New French Owens, which are payable at Messrs. Rownsczataa'. In the Foreign Market there is but little doing. Current Prices: New Spanish 191 20, Old Spanish 24* 1, Ras sian 951, Mexican 76k, Brazilian Scrip I 1 disc. liezkao Scrip 21 1 disc. Danish Scrips disc. Greek Scrip 91 9 disc. Pit ICE OF STOCKS AT ONE O'CLOCK. Bank Stock 233 3 per Cent. lied. 30 1 / 2 1 / 2 S per Cent. Cons. Shut. • 3 per Cent. 9944 Si per Cent. Red. 98 1 / 2 98 4 per Cent. New Shut. Long Ann. 22 1-16 21 15-16 India Stock Shut. India Bonds 53 £l,OOO Ezcheq. Bills 32 34 £509 ditto 32 34 £lOO and £2OO ditto 32 34 Cons. for Acct. 91% % 54. FOREIGN FUNDS, TWO O'CLOCK. Austrian Bds S p Ct. Mt:. Scrip Ms, Brazilian Bonds Ditto Acct. 21 1 1 dig. Ditto Aect. Neapolitan Bonds, 1824, DistoScrip, Spa. 1825, Peru+. Bonds, ft per Ct. 741 Ditto Acct. f db. Ditto Acct. Buenos Ayres Bonds Ditto Scrip, 4 di. Ditto Acct. Ditto Actt. 51 dig Chaim Bonds, 6 p Ct. Portuguese Bonds 88* Colombia. Bds,6 p C. Ditto Acct. Dktoßonds, 1824, ST/ 1 Prussian Bonds S p C. Ditto Acc. 871 1 Do.' Bonds, 18112, 1011 Danish Bonds, S per Ct. Russ. 80nd5,1822, S pCt. 9SI Do. Scrip,s Ott. 1112 S 51 His Ditto for Acc. 9511 Ditto Met. 11 die p. Ct. C. 241 1 * Greek Bonds a t a go lik Acct. 24/ * Ditto Acct. SO Span. S i p. Ct C. 1613, 19.1 1 Do. Scrip 1925, Ditto Acct. Ditto Acc.9/ * 1 dis. French Rents., S p Ct. Men. Bonds, a p Ct. 761 Bachange BRITISH AND FOREIGN SHARES, IWO O'CLOCK. MINKS. SHAWL PAID. PRICS TIM MA Illt. Angle Mexican . .1100 MS bps. .1,5 pin. it Aagla Claillan - - 100 -5 - -Si i Adios Iron and Coal - SO 7 - 13* 13 14 Brazilian - - 100 - 5 '.. -15 1 Balm SO 5 IS 24 Cblllan . AlOO .AS . 16 1 • Cobalt and Copper SO - 9 6* 7i I/ * General Midas Amo. 100 - 5 - - 17 1 1 7 Loudon United IS 5 Si i i . blasgaimm 20 2 4a * / Pomo Peruvian - 100 - 5 - -19 111; Potosi. La Pas. & Perm. SO 5 12 Royal Irish ii Hs. 34. 2 prem. I Xs. / prem. Rio deb Plea - 100 S - -16 Unita* Ides)cso 49 - 20 - Ditto New 40' 10 54 , - • 'AratIItANCI COMPANIU. • - Mame DAM & •For. um 10 31* 4:I Marino Alliance 100 5 51 Protester Fire ' 20 t 1i )4..1) GAN LIGHT AND COIN COMPANY.. CoodnenW. , . • 100 - 8 - , . 11 . 4 . r• ; MISCILLANDOUL • : . • sir /AL MID. MINI 01110 4 111A54 arida ken Gown _.• 100 .• 5 • 7i • - Bridal' Rea ^ latest Bait 50 5 Di t 1 Canal Gas RION - • so t 1, - Ignitable Lem Bank. - so • . I Gemara! Steam Navigation MS - fl, - Cheat Weliatinitar Dairy SS : 4 - 4 i Imperial Ma Mao - . . 100 0 Si Playlet:Nl Nook of 'robs, NM 6 7 Patent arias so I sk I lloyal teary ~ — 1 . s .3, ..:.• ~. We have received the Austrian Observer to the 11th inst. It contains accounts from Greece of a tray dif ferent character from those we have lately rem:nest s and represents the SERASZIIIit as hiving deteititti the Greeks, and invested Anatolie° and Missolosgbi t The Austrian Observer also states that Navarinci bad capita laced; but if later accounts from Trieste, Which are to the 7th inst. can be relied on, Navarino is safe from the enemy. These accounts state that on Wednesdif, the 6th (18th of May), towards midnight, and at day-Eght on Thursday, the 7th (19tb), the glorious and holy day of the Assumption, the brave Greeks burned the whole of the remainder of the Egyptian fleet in the port of Na verino. At the same time the troops under the Presi dent CONDUAIOTTIS and 1 1 / 4 1Auftoutcumtras fell - on the Egyptian army, beat it completely, and made them selves masters of their camp. Few, very few, Egyptians escaped to !odon. It is added, that this glorious and