Star. — London, England, 1819-11-09 00:00:00

F. ti • , 4 1 L .1W INTEL LIG ENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, NOVEMBER t. ATTortxvv-GENERAL N. BULLER. This case stood for judgment to-dav ; but, after some conversation on the subject of the two petitions which were presented on Friday last, the LORD CHAN- Et.eort postponed judgment till to-morrow. The first Cause on the list having been called by tl:c Clerk, an apology was offered by the Counsel for not being prepared to pinceel in it, in consequence of a misunderstanding respecting the place it held on the paper. The second was then called, and a simi-! hr apology was made. Ilis Lordship smiled, and desired the next to be called ; but the third was des tiiled to share the fate to which " the law's delay" had doomed its two predecessors. To a remark of ' his Lordship's, that this cause had been set dowu for hearing to-day at the express request of the Counsel, it was replied by the latter, that had the two first ,causes proceeded, as there was reason to expect, they You'd have occupied the Court all day. Ills Lord ship then whispered to the Clerk to try another; the fourth was accordingly called, and after a long pause, Mr. WETHERELL rose, and stated that he had de voted a whole day to the study of his brief, and was prepared to proceed ; but he believed the Counsel on the other side had not expected the cause to come on so soon. After some desultory conversation on the subject, the LORD CHANCELLOR said he had no ob jections to a walk in the Park; but the Court of Chancery could not afford to observe Saint Mon days ; and therefore, as Mr. Wetherell was so well prepared, as he must be after a whole day's study, he might as well proceed. BROWN V. DE TASTET. This was an appeal from the deci , ion of the late Master bf the }lolls. The plaintiff had filed a Bill for the production of certain accounts against the defendant De Tastet, and De Pavier, another partner in thc same firm ; and the late Master of the Rolls had dismissed the Bill with costs, as against De Pa vier, but had sustained it as against De Tastet. After Mr. WETHERELL had been heard at great length, his Lordship directed the case to stand for further bearing to-morrow, the Counsel for the re spondent nut being prepared w gc on. 001.7 RT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 8. JURISDICTION OF THE LORD CHANCELLOR. We mentioned in our Law Report of yesterday, that Mr. JONATHAN EVANS had moved, on Saturday, 'n behalf of a person named John Cowan, for a Writ of Prohibition, to be directed to the Lord Chancellor, sitting in Bankruptcy, for the purpose of pin-eating the execution of an Order made by his Lordship, in a case of ex-parte Richmond, and that the Court had refused the application, announcing, at the same time, that they should look into the Sta- 1 totes concerniag Bankruptcy, and if any doubt re mained, they would mention the case again, on ac count of its importance. At the sitting of the Court, this morning, The CHIEF Jt7srtce again adverted to the case, and delivered the written opinion of the Court, in confirmation of what passed on Saturday, that the Lord Chancellor had jurisdiction in the case which was the subject of the motion. The Court was the more inclined to this decision, inasmuch as since the first institution of the Bankrupt Laws, now more than 300 years ago, no instance had ever occurred in which this Court had been called upon to restrain an alleged excess of jurisdiction on the part of the Lord Chancellor. The Court, however, did not dis claim any authority to entertain such an application, in a case prop:r for its interposition ; but they were', clearly of opinion that this was not such a case, and, therefore, refused the Rule. In the course of the day several motions were made for new trials, in cases tried at Guildhall, and at the late Assizes, but none of them were of general im portance. Mr. HUNT had come into Court at its first Sitting, but finding its attention preoccupied by the above-mentioned business, he went away, and re turned again about three o'clock, when finding that the Court was still going thiough the Bar with' motions of the same nature, lie spoke pi ivately to, Mr. DEALTRY, in the Crown Office, requesting him to mention to the CHIEF JUSTICE that he had a motion to make, for which he bad been in attendance the whole day. Mr. DEALTRY, accordingly, at the first opportunity, mentioned the circumstance to his Lordship, when a discussion, upon the follewing sub 3ect, took place : ce.rsinua. INFORMATION AGAINST THE MANCHU- TER MAGISTRATES. The CHIEF JUSTICE—I understand that there is a person in attendance, not at the Bar, who is desirous Of making a motion. Where is he ? (Mr. Hunt rose.) You wish to make a motion. What is your motion ? Mr. HUNT—A motion against the Magistrates of Manchester. The Crust JUSTICE—What do you move for ? Mr. lIoNT—I mean to move fur a Criminal In formation. The Cults Jusricr—That is a motion which must be made by some Gentleman at the Bar. Mr. HUNT—My Lord, I have got affidavits. The CH lEIP Just Ica—That may be, but the motion which you think proper to make must be made on behalf of his Majesty, and should be made either by one of his Officers, or by some Gentleman at the Bar. I can't hea: any motion upon such a subject, except from a Gentleman at the Bar. Mr. IIuNT-1 know of no instance, and I have made every inquiry, as well as having consulted the id books, in which a prosecutor has been prevented from prefer4ing his complaint before this Court. The JUSTICE—WeII, Sir, there is no in !ranee, within my knowledge, in which the Court I:as suffered a motion to be made for leave to file a Criminal Information by any other person, save a (;entleinan at the liar. The Co [Er JusTice then called upon Mr. I. POI.- I.r•CK, who had risen to make a motion, when Mr. 1•Int interposed, and endeavoured to be heard. The Cuter J u s E—l refuse to allow you to any such motion ; and I repeat, it must .be • by a Gentleman at the Bar. T. HUNT sat down, and Mr. l'otLocx having ied, he again addressed the Court, and said— Lay I take the liberty of asking your Lordship's :e as to the mode of proceeding which I ought ,dcipt ? • 1 bane beep told that the Courts of Jus tice are open to me. I have neither the means, nor the inclination, to employ Counsel." The CIVET JUSTICE—If you choose you can bring your action for any wrong which you may have sus-, mined ; you now apply fin- a Criminal Information. This is a proceeding at the suit of the King, and I state, that there is no instance in which the Court has permitted such a motion to be made, unless by Gentleman at the Bar. I shall not now establish a precedent for the pursuit of a different course. Mr. HUNT—Then I am not allowed any other pro ceeding than an action at law The CHIEF Jusricr.—We will not allow you to make a motion for a criminal information? Mr. HUNT again attempted to speak. The CHIEF JUSTICE—You have heard the deter mination of the Court. Mr. HUNT—I call upon your Lordship to tell me in what other shape I shall make . my application. Mr. Justice Wm, EY—The Court cannot sit here to advise suitors ; their time is that of the Public. Mr. HI:NT—I am one of the Public. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—I was about to explain to you the grounds upon which the Court act, in order that you may have an opportunity of knowing upon what principle their decision is founded. Every party has a right to come into a Court of Justice to conduct his own su►t, or his defence, or to employ Counsel on his behalf. In the distribution of justice, the Public have certain rights, however, in which the King acts on their behalf; and in order to enable him to act, certain officers are appointed—l mean the Attorney and Solicitor Generals ; and it has been also the course for other Gentlemen of the Bar to stand in the same situation. Gentlemen at the Bar have received an education for the purpose, and they know what points they may, consistently with the rules of law, submit for the consideration of the Court : they know that certain rules exist which they will take care not to in fringe; and, in conducting criminal prosecutions, where persons are to be tried capitally or for a misde meanour, it is of the utmost importance that these rules should be known and observed—otherwise pre judices might he excited in the minds ofJuries, which no subsequent effort of the Judge could remove. I am now speaking with respect to the conduct of cases hefOre Juries, and I know of no distinction between such cases and the case which you have now at tempted to introduce to our notice. If you have re- i ceived any injury, it is open to you to bring your ac :ion ; but you cannot, consistently with the rules of this Court, make a motion for a criminal informa tion, otherwise than through the medium of the Of ficers of the Crown, or a Gentleman at the Bar. i • make I , i "Mr, Ma ativio to Ack \ • Mr. HUNT was about to make an observation— The CIIIEF JUSTICE—You have made your appli cation, and the Court are about shortly to inform you of their reasons for refusing to hear you. Mr. HuxT—l was stopped. The CHIEF JUSTICE—And it was right that you should be stopped, while my Learned Brothers give their reasons for that interruption. Mr. HUNT--With great submission, I apprehend I am entitled to state my reasons for urging my right to make this motion. The CHIEF JUSTICE—Have you any instance in which such an application has been made by a per son not at the Bar? Mr. HUNT—I have abundance of instances, from the earliest period down to your Lordship's becoming Chief Justice of this Court, in which the plaintiffs have gone before Juries. The CHIEF JUSTICE—Have you any instance in which such persons were allowed to move for a cri minal information ? Mr. Htmr—l do not know that I have; but I beg leave to state a case in which a prosecutor was allowed to address a Jury. Mr. Justice BATLEY—That is not the present question ; but, in the case of Mills, the Court so lemnly decided, that a prosecutor in a criminal case had no such right. Mr. HUNT—I beg leave to state, that the case of Mills was not a case similar to this. The case to which I wish to allude is the case of the King, at the prosecution of Pitt, v. Huskisson and others. The case of Mills was where the prosecutor was examined ' as a witness. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—I have intimated, distinctly and broadly that there is no case which sanctions such a motion as this on the part of a private individual. Mr. HUNT—Your Lordship speaks of precedents— will you allow me to cite one which is decisive of the present question? Allow me to refer you to the! case of the'King on the prosecution of Lyon, Has kisson and others. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—That is a case directly against this motion. After my Lord Ellenborough had suffered Mr. Pitt to make an address to the Jury, I took an opportunity of speaking to his Lordship, and represented to him that a private prosecutor could not, in point of law, address the Jury. I re minded him that what he had done in suffering Mr. Pitt to address the Jury as a prosecutor, was con trary to law, and his Lordship ultimately affirmed what I had said, and admitted that what he had done was wrong. Mr. GunN EY interposed—His Lordship stated pub licly before the trial was concluded, that, upon re ilecti3n, he thought he had done wrong in permit ting Pitt to address the Jury. Mi. Justice BAYLEY—And I am quite sure that the mischief which would in very many instances re sult from such a practice, can hardly be calculated. Mr. IluNr —lf there is any law upon the subject, I must be bound by it ; but if your Lordships gu oy precedents, there are several in my favour. The CHIEF Jusricn—You are bound by the judg ment of this Court. If the Legislature thinks that this is not law, then the Legislature may pass an Act of Parliament for our guidance. Mr. HUNT—I can only say, that in no instance which I can find has a prosecutor, in the name of the King, been prevented from addressing the Court and Jury. The CHIEF JUSTICE—The reason of which is, that there is no instance in which any'person has thought fit to offer himself for such a purpose. Mr. Justice BEST thought that the manner in which the Court had been on this occasion treated, sufficiently indicated the propriety of the rule to which allusion had been made. Mr. Hurcr-1 wish .to bring the matter before the Public. I have been told in the Proclamation of the Prince Regent that the . Courtb of Law are open to me, —The Clint! Jus'etct —We have nothing to do with that. Mr. HUNT—I have no Counsel nor Attorney, nor the means of getting avy. I ask your Lordships, therefore, how am I to proceed ? Mr. Justice HOLROYD then proceeded to deliver his opinion.—This is an application on the part of a private individual for a criinn - ro.l information en ph lie grounds. No instance has been mentioned to justify such a proceeding, and it is never allowed except at the instance of Officers of the Crown—such as the Attorney and Solicitor-Generals, authorised to act for the Crown, or Gentlemen at the Bar, v.ho are in their nature public Officers. One instance has been mentioned, and only one, in which— Mr. HUNT again interposed, and uttered something not audible. Mr. Justice Houtorn—l desire not to be inter rupted. One instance has been mentioned, and only one, where a private prosecutor, in the name of the King, was suffered to address the Jury ; but on that very occasion, the Learned and Noble Judge who permitted such a proceeding, admitted afterwards that what was done was not sanctioned by law, and that he had not done right in that rerpecr. I am clearly of opinion that it is not in the power of any individual who may think fit, to conver t himself into Counsel for the Crown ; and I think this appli cation cannot be made by the person now applying. Mr. Justice Besrln a criminal proceeding, no private individual can make himself a party, and therefore it is impossible that the person who 110 W presents himself to the Court can become a party in this case. If this person had received an injury, and wished to obtain satisfaction for that injury, lie nii ht become a party in a civil suit, and then present him- self to the Court in his own name. That, however, is not the question now before us. Ile comes for ward as the advocate of the King, which the law says' he cannot be allowed to do, because the King will be the only party who can set the law in motion. In criminal informations, the King is one party, and the defendant is the other, and the question is, whether this person is in a situation in which he can present I himself to us as the advocate of the King? If any precedent could be cited in which such a proceeding had been allowed, I should have thought it right to consider whether we ought to be bound by that pre cedent? But there is no such precedent, in which such a practice has been admitted; and no case can be cited in which such a proceeding can occur but at the instance of the Attorney and Solicitor-General, or of a Gentleman at the Bar. As no case can be found to authorize this proceeding, shall we make a precedent ? What right have we to say that this per son shall thus intrude himself as the person who is 'to inform this Court for the King ? I can see no reason for it; and I am sure that the replies made to the Court to-day by this person, are pregnant with proofs hew extremely improper it would be to establish such a precedent. When a Gentleman at the Bar has stated what he thinks it is important for the Court to hear, he stops and receives the judgment of the Court. That, however, is not the case with such advocates as the person we have now before us ; far 'they are never contented with any thing said by the Ccurt. It would be attended with dreadful incon• venience to the administration of justice, if such per ' sons could be permitted to discharge the important duties of advocates. lam clearly of opinion that this ' motion cannot be entertained at the instance of the present applicant. Mr. HUNT, in a discontented tone, left the Court, saying— ,, I can only say, that the Manchester Ma gistrates will have no application made against them by a Gentleman of the Bar." TEASDALE D. WILLIAM CLEMENT, ESQ. This, it will be recollected, was an action against the defendant, as proprietor of The Observer News paper, for an alleged libel published in that Journal, touching the plaintiff's conduct with •respect to the disposal of a dead body entrusted to his care, as a Constable, under the direction of a Police Magistrate, the body having been taken out of the hands of cer tain resurrection men. At the trial before the Chief Justice at the Sittings in Westminster after last Term, the plaintiff was nonsuited, having failed to make out in proof; certain allegations in the decimation. Mr. GURNEY now moved to set aside thi nonsuit, and obtain a new trial ; and having stated the point upon which the nonsuit proceeded, The COURT were clearly of opinion, that the direc tion of the ChieF Justice at Nisi Prins was perfectly right, and therefore refused the Rule. A letter from Manchester, dated November 5, sajs, " Last night there was a meeting of the Committee for the Relief of the Sufferers on the 16th of August, which was respectably attended. A considerable number of sabre -cuts, wounds, and bruises, which had been previously unknown, came under observa tion. Two young men from Middleton exhibited se vere sabre cuts, one on the right side, the other on the back of his head, with corresponding cuts in their hats. A young woman from the same place exhi bited her left hand, still bound up, and injared by a deep cut inflicted by a sabre, while she held up her hand to guard her head. These three persons had had surgical assistance immediately, so that it is put beyond the possibility of doubt that they were cut on the 16th of August, while'the severity of the cuts' is most manifest on inspection. Many others, men, women, and children, exhibited wounds by cuts and thrusts of sabres, and at the same time identified the persons who struck them ; but as their statements were not given on oath, or with the solemnities of judicial investigation, we, refrain from detailing them. The names of Johnson; Mason, and Green, alluded to above, are to be found in the Calendar of prisoners at the late Salford Sessions. On tie me morable 16th of August these men were knocked dcwn, crushed, and bruised, and immediately hurried off to the New Bailey. Johnson was committed on the charge of shouting " Hunt and Liberty ;" Mason on the charge of " riot ;" and Green on the charge of " hissing.' In the cells of the N ew B a il e y t h ey lay from the 16th of August to the 30th of October. Ou that they they !% ere called up as their narnc... occurred in the Calendar, when it,was read over at the Jail delivery. The Clerk said respecting each successively, " No Bill." The Chairman added, " Let him be dis charged." We.have not been able to le:un, whether the Grand Jury had actually ignored the bills, or whe ther the proseutors lud refrained from prefer ring bills. —Several suspicious claims were_ made upon the Funds of the Committee. More thaimme &amp; at imposition was detected." L 4. sivvulielaiektriCo..Kß:N.n.t.:.:.::sßKET,;---rMicART:-Td.s ' ze... ... ... ........... .... .....; r c.r.: T id.:.1...t . 6 : 5 47, 5:: . I V it : : .l ll: e s :K aA:: : : r .p,i.;tt„..:.4.lo ''''E . XGV EN'at.3lt. I &tall Ba.rs .. Norfolk ....... -•, It s , , :::cw) heal[ 6 B. 1 kla s Boilers. .. .................. 4 3 :2 '4 , v ss , i l l 71 : 1 . :::: : ..... 47 ; ; ; P :Il ti , r .. .u 1 : : : :: : ; . ; : ; i c.. . : , , 1. . i i . .: *. 0 . ::: : :: .....--• 68. 7d- 1 - ''. '•.lt 13' • I "BE Grey Pa ' s dii?s SL• 1 r:r.rc.-. tlr.ls It.,1 t., AVERAGE PRICES of CORN in Fr-.;1 1-4 _• ' I C-- the li.•turns received in ti t .. '.', , c '. -, •. ': ' 1:-. 7 '' .- ''''t f Ns6V.G.h‘ l : l: 4 l st. Avet s4 : l .g ß : .de7 l : irice o lj7s ; l7.r S k u dBv g : ar, f l2st r .)s C.: :Id; .V 1:: ::: ; :: -. ' :::: : L: 11::::::11i' Gazette, in the wed: ending the :.',d of ,:...• e.'lej:D.,l7.s'Ziesi..l 1),.. , ... s p,.. TEazsn LEADENIIALL MARKETS, NOV. p N t• E r l e ; c: c t : A the 1 (.\' a , r e c a a i :e.; it ci to AC I J.MO I f u rthe Beef ... ...... ...n 1.1 t 01, 3 . ); fliS will b 1 Metoll 4s Od to ;:s Oti I Pork --- --.5s W. to ti FAN PRICES or HAY awo STR ' NV 1 ' 1'; , '"17 R TIl- WWI I c S ll t i ry. v 7 l. l 4 ( l l .l s+ 7 °s 4: :: j e .W od .. ti mE t t t s o o. o s.s o ll l l 1 1 : s: ° ti c d d d S T :t 1 : :: ; .7 ... , .... . 4 1 ' i 1 1 l 1 1. ; :: .i , -t t t i - .. : 5 1 1 :1 1 ;, ::*:, '. se VI liII:APITL . wish Arran %.ciPal PRICi: OF HOPS. Vest NEW LAO,. lobar !:F•V ro.'e tts . Kent '3::s&c a Essex - 1... r: iv] ... 11 E: to ...1 16s 11.-shars PR ICE or TALLOW, -' '1 ' ' , Th ••‘ :1 • , .:c. r,.1-1:_.!,. Town Tallow ' 6tts Od I Di.te re.. • ' '.; MR ..... ... ...... ..: ' Yellow Russia ... ..... 57,‘ el `i&c....-..i p i NVllite thy') - , •alltrl 525 52 s t ° / : I t I ( I )' :!in e s :.: .. ....... - --:. • A /1 4 Soap ditto Melting Stuff . ........... . , PRICE OF CA ND1.F..‘7.-FrCm T - lIG%-: .1-'17..:..i5. I': Pan Candles, per dor. 1 1 s cid-Moulds, E - - s od ; id. per ika, fool a1ity. , .......! for ready mer,e-r. r. M RAW HIEF.S. 1 ..,. Pu Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordira.r.... es Oil to ~< . ned • of . stone) ^s le.l to 5.: 21 nie2es Calf Ss ''d :j ‘.., Iklidcllings ...r.s td to Ils 6.; 1'.v.17...- - sc is u 2, vs (. 1 ..e bri Sheepskins-Downs, Zs Oil to 4s-Shcl!'r, 41 c 4 :c. ' I:nne 'ratio PRICE OF LEATI:'.T. • He Butt., 50 to .56Ibs each - ^ , l to ~ re: to Ditto, 56 to tit:lbs each Dressirg !Aides '.. t) 11 DOI Fine Coach Hides - e , ,-,, •,--./ I Crop Hides, 35 to 401tts for c..:t:l g.........:.7: .:,, .-• b 7 Ditto 45 to 501hs • d to •.,:a Lee Calf Skins, 30 to 401.)s - Oil to r.a " ' Ditto 50 to 7011)s 'ad t.. 7:d ---TI Ditto 70 to SCllss '6l to 7,:d -- t Small Seals CCr,.enl..r.tl) MI t. 2:1 lagl large ditto per dozen ties ty 711 ES Tanned Horse ll;des l%l to •-•:: Spanish Horse Hides... .. .............. lsd to ".'... . as CO.' , MARKET, NOVI ::Bill S. Con Ships at Market. Ships Sold. Price. The 544 Newciotle .7 , 21 42.. Od to 47. 19 Sunderland 19 42s eel to Ci ii Ns No information, it is said, has yet been recelel 11 from Lieutenant PARRY, who commands the ex • ell tion for exploring Bailin's Bay. A, the season ism ett I rapidly advancing, it is conjectuted he bas pas- through Sir James Lancaster's Sound, p(,:..Yithst.L.3: - P Captain llos . i's assertion of its be'.:-.g encempasitl with land, or that he is unable to i eturn to the sou i• 3.1 ward, from the tremendous bet's and masse , elk! which move in that direction durine; the summer. la either case, no deficiency of plovtooas or van cloathing can be experienced, as both the Hal, a and GRIPER are well stored - ....ith every neccrs:• - ; •.k is well known that Lieutenant PARAY a!sya , :s co:. ceived that every attempt at discovery in the Hz • regions was generally relinquished at the f:rne r',.e2 the greatest chance of success offered. The trs - tlt'.l of August, September, and October, arc ccr,iee ' as the most favotitals:e in this respect, the retie rarely beginning to form till December, until rind time the old ice continues .wasting. The land etpe A dition, under Lieutenant FRANKLYg, from Fert lA, ,• Hudson's Bay, to the Copper-mine River, where gr. , HEARSE stated he fell in with the sea, pri•,:eeds , . fore the close of the present year, by which he reach the high northern latitudes in the sprir.g, Ili • have the summer to prosecute his researches. Litt . tenant FRANKLY':, with a Surgeon, two :klidshipmtli and two stamen, have been some time at Fort I . ^7i, making the necessary arran:emcnts with tl:e Ir.d.c.s T for their journey. _ __ __ ___,_.-- ___ . .- ----- _ - • • lIARRIED. ti Lately, at Eatisbon, Count Charles Westethrlt, el•lcst rzt ' 1 Count 11 esterholt, to his cousin, A:i.is Harriet Spencer, y:6:-ibl th daughter of the Hen. NV. R. Spencer, of Whe_tr.elC, Cv . .r. On Tuesday mo-ning bat, in•Stomhowa Charel. JC*Fc!' ( : ( 7 . pock, Esq. of Clifford'.. fun, London, Navy .'t,.. ,, ' i =t', to .:0, fourth daughter of John Kent, Esq. Steward of the floTa‘:.l l d 1-106;:itai; niece to Colonel Robert Wright, of the lical !Jr]. .. eery, and Lieutenant-Colonel George Wright, ceinr....s.,Clili -. 'ft Royal En?,ineers,in the Wand of Ceylon, and grand--iecc :els Excellency John Hunter, Esq. late Governor of Y.'s t'..: ,,, : 3 Wales, ike. and a Vice-Admiral of the Red Scu:dron. ' Sunday se'nnight a singular marriage •Nas so!emniz.d at N: - /- 4 hellion, near Huddersfield, between Joshua Mike. - ::..1 :)-r/ Moor Loos:. The man, being deaf and dumb, of cc - r.c -:,-.lt. 7. 1 - ' repeat the necessary forms of the marriageterentony ; '.•I t! , s difficulty was obviated in an ingenious manner ; as •••e w.se-! Ito read, the book was presented to him, a.:al he tt aced the T;or- I over with his finger. From the singularity of tile c.c.:..:: - .....as attending it, this mart iage had excited great curios:.?: ; ~.- ti . ::* 4 whole congregation retnaii.t-d to witne.)s the cereate72:,_ DIED. .. V .7! Lately, at Tiverton, in Devonshire, Arabella, the vi i: • • Rev. Henry Land. Wednesday, maidenly, at Buxton, Tbotrai Kinn:ll'o.n' 7. HI an eminent Banker at Newcastle, and the chest !!:miser o.' e • Pt Corporation of that place. , . Sunday se'rt,ight, agA 4.1, Mr. John Robinson , of :ni.e',-' • AI near Mac, tin :.•Id, very remarkable fir the :1•:;a 1 ..r c...!:•• , .. "., _ tot and clan uutive s:ae of his person, and the errs! do r , " : !le Lion be tweed the size of his head apt/ the oth v parts of hish :l •6l: Ila lls Lately, at their rasac cottage, in the parish of 13on,;leen .. :. to chelsea, where they had lived for nearly tiO wars,-- bttl",":"', 'lll and his wife. A few hours only had elapsed .-ft.r . :Lc Jra:. a• her husband, when his aged painter, unable to stipp.-rt tar , :i . ; ..... fell a sudden victim to her grief ! They were teiknessl t " 3.„ grave, which openeel t.s receive tin ns boas, no: oak il . U . :; r own prigeny, but by ni.iny ni4lll),ttrill cotta;zers. by +'... • 4 they had been uniformly reverenced as "parents 0: tis -,-:-... V ----'-' - --- -- - - - .7 --- -- --- - - . 7-7-- - - ------- MAILS 111111 Dar.-A RAC. 11 , 1:Ii. •I/ 14 ' ' • IS t 1 I Dublin 1 0 i Lisbon 1 a Waterford 1 0 _=,Frame Guernsey and Jersey o 1 I Hamburgh 0 O I 1 Llanelli:l. 0 1 GottenburLh I O ' I . Flandors 0 0I Ma - - , 4 ---'- • -----7 " - • y.1.0 , '- 1.11611-W.VrElt at LONDON I3HIDt; R. TO-o.t •• .. 31‘ ruing . . - 41 te lintites .iftrt S I -7 =- Afternoon . - - 11 ---•- --.. I , i 3 ., 2. LOND- ON t rzultetlAlit 1 rill ',lamb"! by habit ' • I :'lace, Tim i , lc- Dal , . . . '~ i u r. .