Star. — London, England, 1818-03-17 00:00:00

Awu Do p a rishes, it would only be necessary for Va to quote the account given by of Mr d . Yates of uty forte v ast he had done in taking turn F en _ who was a Clergyman of a populous pari d Da Gentleman stated that was . obligecl to k tre t ii k t t he Church to read pra at nine o cloc in e ['jag, then came on the full service at the usual "or of eleven o'clock, then the afternoon service, ii to baptize 17 children, and to read the burial ice five times. The Committee would judge how i t was possible for any one man properly to exe ,te such severe duty. M r.Yates mentioned another , perhaps still more striking, in which the average va her of christenings every Sunday was from 40 :,-,0, besides those on week days, and at the Pesti 's of Christmas and Easter they increased to 120 or ,50. Each Sunday banns were proclaimed for sel less than 120 couple, and in one instance 156 as e . These cues must be quite sufficient to chew necessity of providing some remedy. The pro hien which he was about to submit to the Com te was as important in a civil as in a religious rot of view. It would be of course expected of him state the outline of the measure which he intended What he meant to propose was a grant prir se. he extent of one million, not to be raised in one t, nor in one year, but to be placed at the disposal :ommissioners to be appointed by his Majesty.— ranting a certain determinate sum, the Commis as would be the better enabled to proportion the ,cs: of their aid in particular cases ; and it would , io , ve the public a settled notion of the extent of oritef which might be expected. He should pro the money to loe raised by Exchequer Bills, to c harged on the aids of each year ; so that the pro mto meet them might be made from time to or at the end of each year. In Queen Anne's ..:, St Commissioners were appointed under the teat Seal, to whom the administration of the sum by Parliament was entrusted. At that time a ty was imposed on all coals imported to the City London, and the money was raised from time to - upon the security of that duty. These Commis s were enabled by this means to build eleven 'hurches. The present grant would enable more to done. It world not be restricted to the metropo- Sut would be extended to all those parishes through the kingdom, to which, upon examination and tiry, it might be thought proper to extend some ~a of the money. In distributing it regard would had not merely to the want of the parishes, but their ability to raise money for themselves.— ii was to be extended from the proposed vote, ra in the way of encouragement and assistance to trashes and districts to provide themselves with ac mmodation for the purpose of Divine Worship, :to as a complete exoneration from the trouble or iense of contributing to that purpose themselves. Ith respect to the further details of the intended A cure, it had been thought that it would be right -e in the Crown, and in the patrons of the leap as Parishes, the power of completely dividing pa hes for all ecclesiastical purposes, where such di e might be deemed expedient. A provision for purpose would be contained in the Bill which it ill be probably his duty to introduce. By this as the expense of effecting such divisions, by , of private Acts of Parliament, would be °b led. Lut it would be provided that this should done only with the consent of the patron, and that the present or future incumbent would be in way affected by it, in every such case the in at was to be indemnified. If the consent of patron could be obtained, or if it should he fight that the parish ought not to be completely 'de& then, in such case, the Bill would authorisel iarict division—that is, a division into districts of :h extent as might be deemed most convenient.— titbir cases again (and they were likely to be very , •rous), where, without any division of 'any kind, ili be desirable to erect churches, or rather cha ts, one inconvenience had been suggested against is plan, namely, that there would be no commu ': of interest between the parochial incumbent and new clergyman. To obviate this a provision aid be iaserted, whereby it should be enacted, at when chapels or churches were erected, without ay division of the parishes, a parochial curate should ' appointed and a district allotted to him, and that s'a ,uld not be removable by the clergyman of the Csh, but only by the Bishop of the Diocese. Thus whole plan comprehended three modes :—first, eAeslastical division of parishes ; second, a divi of parishes into districts; and thirdly, the erec nof ch tpels of ease, where no actual division of r kind was made, such chapels to be served by ates removable only by the Bishop. In the twenty at parishes which he had before mentioned, it had -alculated that not less than seventy-seven large orzhes would he required, to afford moderate eon:moll:4)i to one-third of the inhabitants.— ,: lese statements he had made r.o deduction for aZ;e of the population who were not Members of • Faablished Church; and this omission was meant nut any disparagement to Dissenters. The prin on which he went was, that as the money would 'vied cn the public at huge without exception, so could be no exception in providing aceommo . At th.! same time, there was little Zoubt that persons did not now attend the Established .ch, merely, ',ecause for want of accommodation loons were shut against them (hear, hear, hear!) seed not call to the recollection of the Commit very respectable society which had lately been 'shed for the purpose now in view. From the 1 of that society he anticipated much important ante. In the Bill which he would probably in ce, provision would be made, authorizing sub ons for this laudable purpose. In the whole a respect for private rights so far pervaded ) part of it, that it had been thought proper to all the new patronage in the present patrons of respective parishes in which it might arise.— la those cases where Chapels alone were erected, incumbent would only have the patronage in !here he was spiritually answerable for the rl SOWS throughout his whole parish. To givel ilea of the present distribution of patronage, it '.I be proper for him to state, that in the twenty.' n i iOtes which he had mentioned, the patronage i ~n the Crown, of two in the Archbishop ,:.,... ).1..y, of three in the Bishop of London, of 1 • Archdeacon of London, of six in Chapters . .''=glate Bodies, of two in Corporations, of one :i:-.l).ent was elected by th e p ar i s hi oners , an d - - , ALag eigLt were in the hands of private pa trons. He felt, and he was sure the Houle would feel, that this was no question of politics or part y--(Cheers.) It was one which must come home to every member of the Established Church, and such were all those whom he saw around him. It was with pleasure that he recollected that his Noble Friend, one of the Se cretaries cf State, and himself had, on one occasion, some years back, sat between two Hon. Members, now no more—he meant the late Mr. Rose and the late Mr. Whitbread—all of whom in turns addressed themselves to this subject, and their sentiments were perfectly unanimous. On the present occasion he trusted a like unanimity would be found to prevail. (Hear.}—Without further occupying the time of the Committee, he moved— ,, That this Committee hav ing taken into consideration the passage of the Speech of the Lords' Commissioners referred to them, are of opinion that Exchequer Bills to the amount of one million be granted, to be laid out as Commissioners, to be appointed by his Majesty for that purpose, might resolve, for the building of Churches and Chapels." Captain WALDEGRAVE and General THORN TON expressed their approbation of the motion. Sir CHARLES MONCK expressed his entire ap probation of the motion. He thought nothing was more likely to reclaim Dissenters to the Church than such a measure. But he was far from thinking it would produce so great an improvement in the mo ral habits of the people. The City of Norwich con tained 39 Churches. Was it remarkable for the greater morality of its inhabitants? Durham, too, contains a great many Churches ; and Newcastle only four or five ; but was Durham more moral than Newcastle? He thought some modification ought to have been made with respect to the mode and time of performing Divine Service. Before the Re formation, service was performed at all hours, as now in the Churches on the Continent. It became those who brought forward this measure to have done something with the view of having Divine Ser vice more frequently performed during the day.— He thought that if it was determined that the ac commodation in Churches was deficient, the House should at once determine to vote such sum as would be necessary, without confining itself to a million.— Why not more than a million, or less than a million ? He would rather that a Board of Commissioners was appointed is each county, than one general Board of Commissioners. Upon the whole, however, he en tirely approved of the measure as proposed. Mr. GIPPS wished to know whether it was in tended to confine the assistance to be granted from the sum proposed to such parishes only as contained 10,000 inhabitants or upwards ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER— Not to be confined to such, though it was most pro. bable that the aid would chiefly be required by such parishes as contained above 10,000 or 12,000 inha bitants. He had omitted two points. First, as to a provision for the new Clergymen ; that would pro bably in a great degree be supplied by the produce of pews. Secondly, as to the more frequent per formance of Divine Service. In all the Churches to be built under this Act, it was to be provided, that Divine Service should be performed three times a day ; and it might probably be deemed expedient to extend the like provision to Churches already built. In answer to a question by Mr. N. CALVERT, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, it was not meant to divide the Church Service, but to have the whole service oftener performed: _ Mr. W. SMITH remarked on the extent of some parishes in Scotland. He knew one in which the dis tance from one part of the parish to the parish church was thirty miles. In answer to what fell from the Honourable Baronet (Sir C. Monck), he defended the moral character of the City of Norwich. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that with respect to Scotland it must be seen that the regulation of the Scotch Church was so very different from that of the Church of England, that the pre sent measure could not extend to that country. At the same time, his Majesty's Ministers had not over looked the situation of the Church of Scotland, and felt no disposition to object to a separate proposition of this kind for Scotland.—After a few words from Mr. WARRE, Dr. PHILLIMORE, and Mr. GIPPS, all of whom were in favour of the Motion, the question was put and the vote agreed to without a dissentient voice.—The Report to be received to-morrow. TITHES. The Order of the Day for the second reading of the Tithe Laws Amendment Bill having been read, Mr. CURWEN said that if the House would allow the Bill to go into a Committee, he would then strike out the clause respecting a modus, which had been considered so objectionable. He took this opportunity of disclaiming any intention of invading the rights or the property of the Clergy by the mea , ,ure which he had brought forward. The question which he wished to settle was only, whether in point of time the Church might assume that property which had never belonged to it ? Sir WILLIAM SCOTT opposed the whole prin ciple of the Bill, and combated most of its clauses. He contended that although in some cases, composi tions might be taken from the circumstances or habits of the incumbent, yet their habitual usage sheuld not be made a ground for a measure like the present, which tended to repeal the most important provisions of the existing Acts on that subjact, and to establish a total discharge of tithes from mere living memory. He concluded by moving that the Bill be read a se cond time this day six months. Sir S. ROMILLY defended the Bill from its own merits, and conceived that nothing could be more unjust than to represent it as an invasion of the pro perty of the Church. On the contrary, it was cal culated to prevent that invasion, and to secure the rights of the Clergy, which were as sacred as any others. But as the law now stood, a person pur chasing an estate tithe free, and giving a particular consideration on that account, might afterwards be forced to pay tithes by the revival - of long dormant claims. This the Bill was intended to prevent. To dispose of a measure having so many important ob jects in view, at its second reading, was to refuse to discuss its merits. The property of the Church was sacred, but the way to make it so was not to turn it into a means of injustice to others. Mr . WETHERALL defended the Tithe Laws as tLey stood. He had never met with any authority which mentioned that injustice resulted from them. I He objected to going into the Committee, as he did not disapprove of the clause only, bet of the principle I of the Da He contended that it was not necessary to chew a deed to prove an exemption from t:thcs it was sufficient to establish by collateral evidence that such a deed had existed, and had been lost or destroyed. Mr. SMITH shortly opposed the Bill. Mr. BROUGHAM argued strongly in favour of the provisions of the Bill. Mr. PEEL objected to the Bill altogether. The House divided—For the second reading 15— Against it 4.4 —Major i t y 29. The Longitude BSI went through a Conuniuee. Several blinks were filled up, and souse new clauses added. The Husbandry Horse Duty /NU was read a third time, and Pa Sir E.. BRYDGES brought in a Bill to amend the Law with respect to Authors' Copyrights. The Bill was read a first, and ordered to be read a second time on the 10th of April, and to be printed. Lord A. HAMILTON presented a Petition from the Uni versity of Glasgow, against the Copyright HiU^To be printed. Mr. LUSHINOTON brought in a Bill to amend so much of the 43d of the King as related to the Pensions granted to the Widows of Writers to the Signet in Scotland.—Read a first time, and ordered to be read a sesond time to-morrow. Petitions were presented against the Leather Tax from Horn castle, in Lincolnshire, Borougkbridge, Spilby, and other places. Mr. BANKES moved for an Account of the Annual Profits , and Emoluments of every kind received by the High Bailiff of Westminster since 1807,, distinguishing each year, and the sources of those profits.—Agreed to. The House adjourned at One o'Clock this morning. MURDERS AT GREENWICH. Yesterday an examination took place before W. SmiTH, Esq. Colonel FOREMAN, and a number of Magistrates for the County of Kent, at the Office ofl Greenwich, when the following witnesses were exa mined, charging William Hazelton on suspicion of being accessary to the murder of Mr. George Bird and Mrs. Mary Simmons, and Charles Hussey (not yet in custody) with being the actual perpetrator of the said murders. The business of the town was in a great measure suspended, hundreds of persons followed the prisoner from the cage to the Magistrates Office, and num bers of respectable persons were unable to gain ad mittance. The town was not in greater agitation on the day the murders were discovered. The first evidence was Mrs. Godwin, wife of Mr. Godwin, of Peckham. She said that she was the sister of Hussey, the supposed murderer. About a week after the murders were committed, her brother came to her house and said that he was going to see his brother, who resides at Basingstoke. He went to a box which was under her bed, and took some thing out, she supposed it was money, for he had 671. left him four days after the murders were com mitted, by a sister (who cut her throat) who resided in Queen-street, Cheapside. He informed her that he (Hussey) should return from Basingstoke in one week, but he did not return until Tuesday last. She then said to him, " Oh, Charles, I have been so un easy during your absence, I have had such frightful dreams, and could not think what detained you." — He replied, 0 Why, what could cause you to dream?' and appeared agitated. He went out on Tuesday evening. After he was gone she said to her husband, " I think that there is something in Charles's box that should not be ;" his behaviour caused her to say so ; she went to the box which was under the bed, and got a bunch of keys, and the first one she tried un locked the box, and she found the two watches then before the Magistrates ; she did not examine the box further, but mentioned the circumstance to her hus band ; he advised they should be taken to Greenwich, it occurred to him, as well ar herself, the moment he saw them, that they were Mr. Bird's property. Their suspicion was further confirmed from Charles not returning after he left her house on Tue-day ; when he left he said that he was only going on a visit to his brother in Tottenham-court-road. Mr. Bennett, watch-maker, of Greenwich, said, that he knew one of the watches (the tortoise-shell one) to be the property of the late Mr. Bird ; he had tepaired it more than once. He should think the other, the gilt watch, was his also, from its having his private mark on, which he always puts on every watch he has repaired, but he could not say posi tively to that faet. Mr. Bird, the son of the late Mr. G. Bird, identi fied both watches as his late father's property. Mrs. Goddard, of Hughes's-field, Deptford, stated, that she was aunt to Charles Hussey's wife. About a week after the murders were committed, a leather trunk was brought to her house by a man named Sutton, who said that Charles had sent it. Charles Hussey did not come near her house after the trunk was left, and daily inquiries were made after him, which caused her to suspect that all was not right.— Curiosity induced her and her husband, on Wednes day last, to open the trunk, which was only fastened by a cord, to see what it contained. She found a silver ladle, and several other articles of silver plate; also some bloody clothes. She suspected that Charles had not come honestly by the property, and went over to Peckham, to inform his sister, where she learned of the discovery she had made. She believed that the trunk then before the Magistrates contained the same articles as when left at her house by Sutton. Richard Hodges sworn, stated that he and Lark ing, his brother constable, belonging to Greenwich, received information that caused them to go to Mrs. Goddard's, where they searched a trunk, and found a silver wine-strainer, a soup spoon, two shirts, three pair of sheets, a white jean jacket, stained with blood in several places, especially about the right hand pocket ; a pair of gaiters, made of drab cloth, with blood upon the buttons of them ; a piece of new shirting, which was very bloody, and a glazed hat. After finding those things, he and Larking went to Mrs. Godwin's, at Peckham, and searched the box there belonging to Hussey, and found five one pound Bank of England notes, and two two pound Bank of England ; each note had some persons name written on the back. One of the W. notes was endorsed, " February 13th, 1817, Nimmo." In the same box they found Hussey's discharge from the Last India Company's service, his age, and description. Mr. Nimmo, tallow-chandler, said, that the 21. note endorsed " Feb. 13, 1817, Nimmo," he believed was the property of the late Mr. Bird. He believed that he paid it to him on the day mentioned on the note ; he had referred to his book, and found that on the 13th of February, 1817, he paid to Mr. George Bird two pounds. The endorsement was his writing. Mrs. Bell stated, that she was washer-woman to the deceased Mr. Bird for 18 years ; she knew the linen belonging to the family very well, from having frequently washed it. One of the three pair of sheets produced she could positively swear were the pr operty of the late Mr. Bird, and also the two shirts. Mrs. Luton stated, that the jacket and gaiters found in Husr.ey's box were the apparel she had him wear ; her husband is a cooper, and was by Charles Hussey to take the box to Mrs. Goddard', which he accordingly did. Mr. Hussey, brother to Charles Hussey, stated, that he resided at Peckham ; Charles was to dined with him on the Bth of February, the da; murders were discovered, but did not come night. He asked him how it was that he had kept his word? and he replied, " Why, have you heard of the shocking murders that have been mitted ? why, Greenwich has been all day like a and then informed him of the particulars of the , ders. He noticed to him that he looked very un He said, " I am poorly; I have drank some beer on the road, and that has made me very un.. lam very sick." He advised him to take somethini to carry off the sickness ; he appeared very much tated. On Tuesday last Charles Hussey went Tottenham-court-road to see his brother, and returned home. His wife, after he was gone, something preyed upon her mind which she not account for, and particularly wished him to Charles's box; he persuaded her not, and told h was all folly, and she went and opened it her'elf; moment he saw the watches the Greenwich murder occurred to him, and he felt confident the property belonged to the late Mr. Bird ; and finding Charles did not return, he supposed that he ha'. sconded, and he sent his wife with the property the Churchwardens of Greenwich. He thought probable that Charles Hussey was gone to see wife, who was lying in at her friends, at Burton, Bridport, in Dorsetshire. The above evidence being taken. The prisoner, Hazleton, stated, that he had knowledge of the murder whatever. He felt hi very much hurt at the reports which had appeal in the Newspapers, charging him with being cerned in such a transaction. Magistrate.—" You know that you were drinking with until six o'clock the night the murders were committed, and were his companion, always drinking togetlx.,r, and you beta, servant out of place, must get money by .some nicans or other be able to live that way." Prisoner.—" I acknowledge that I was with him on 'turday: I drank with him at the Tiger's head, and afterwal we went to the Ship and INllet, on the Woolwich-road, we parted, and I went to my father's, where I slept that I hope you will take bail for my appearance, as I am as cent of the charge as the child unborn." Magistrate.—" I cannot take bail at present. There evidence against you as warrants me to detain you for the sent. Ido not say you were concerned in the murders;' were thelast person with the man who, I am satisfied, did the murders. lie, probably, will be in custody in the course to-morrow (this day), and circumstances then may occur will cause me to hold you to bail" Prisoner.—" I wish he may be taken to-night; for the is a shocking place to be confined in." Magistrate.—" If you arc innocent, this will be a warning you, (as I hope it will bz to others,) not to keep bad compass , At present you must be committed for re-examination -- cure day."-I.7pwilds of 9.0 Officers are in pursuit of Hi CORONER'S INQU'EST.—A Youxo Sit HIS FATHER.—Last night, at seven o'clock, an 1.., was taken in the Board Room, St. Thomas's Hospital, Borough, on the body of John Faweett, jun. who died from the a shot he received by the hand of his father, on Friday ni Mary Ann Bush, aged eleven years, said she was the e of Mr. Bush, potatoe-dealer, corner of Joiner and Tooter On Friday night, a little before nine o'clock, she was in he. thee* shop, when John Fawcett, the elder, (now a prisoner Hoesemonger-line Jail,) came in and asked for her father. went immediately to the bottom of the stairs, knowing ti father, the deceased, and Mrs. Fawcett, her father's housekeeper. were up stairs, and she called " Father." He did not answ ' when she first called, and she called " Father" a second s' her father replied, " I am coming;" she said to Mr. " My father is coming down." Her father was on floor when she first called. The deceased, John Fawcett, down stairs, and as he was coming down the bottom sta 3 - cett the elder fircd a pistol with his 11l hand, which he tt under a large white coat, at the deceased; the pistol was towards the deceased's left side. The deceased fell ul knees, and put his hand to his side : his father said " Oh rushed out of the house. A Mrs. Cummins followed 1, " took hold of him; he forced himself out A her grasp, down a court, but was soon apprehended by Mr. Sped Mrs. Cummins corroborated the above evidence. Juryman.—" Do you know v.hether the stairs are so that the deceased could be seen by his father as he came Witness continued.--" I have once examined the stairs: are very dark and winding. The father looked very piteous the deceased when he saw that he had wounded him. Mr. William Speck, Attorney, Horsleydown, visited at the Watchhouse; Le told him that he had been used humanly by his wife and Bush. She had been married twenty years; he had had sixteen children by her, and tb happily before Bush became acquainted with her. He , his wife, and she supplied him with money, which the bread duced by its sale, and he could not thereby meet his den , - Mr. Henry Speck, of Rotherhithe, corroborated the . ness's evidence, and added, that when he told the prisoner he had shot bis son, ha replied—" I am sorry for it." Mr. Bassett, of St. Thomas's Hospital, stated, that he ned the deceased, and found a large wound under the los on the lift side, about two inches in diameter. He attends all night, and administered those things likely to do him s He died neat day at two o'clock. He previously asked ceased, how he happened to be shot? He replied—" shot me in mistake for Bush." He did not think the believed himself in danger when he said so. The Jury having viewed the body, the CORONER them briefly. He said that the law would not justify a repaired to a house with an intention to murder one man, mistake killed another. The Jury, after about half an hour's deliberation, returned Verdict of infid Ma, der against John Fawcett, SC7I. MARLIONOCOU-STREET.—ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION..., Cann:, a Frenchman, a man short in stature, and of sqt pearance, was charged with a capital felony, in woune... best Mat hias, a Frenchman, and a Roman Catholic Priest, a broad sword, on Sunday morning during Divine Service. • • _ _ Spanish Chapel, in Thayer-street, Manchester-square. fence the prison!! declared that he went to the chapel purpose of murdering the priest, and that he was act this horrible deed, in consequence of the prosecutor caused him to be turned out of the chapel, and refusing Sacrament on the grounds of insanity, which he conceived be spiritual murder, as he could nut present himself other chapel. The prisoner was remanded. BOS , STAELT:FIRC AT TUI OLYMPIC THLATILI..... two firemen, otte belonging to the County Fire-oLfice, to another office, together with a turneock of the Ni Company, applied to sir. &etas, fur his signature to cert authorizing them to receive the rewards allowed by Act ment to the first and second engines, and the turn.-cock fi ding at the Olympic Theatre in Wych-street, which had Ste yesterday morning. They stated that the *Lawn of formances dosed on Saturday evening, and a man was employed to clean the theatre. He had a tire in the fire -1 the back of the stage, and imprudently put a large qua( waste paper, &c. into the fire, which blazed up the which being made of iron, soon became red hot. The . happily discovered, was soon extinguished without the of playing the engines. The magistrates signed the cer, and informed the mess they were to receive the rewards the parish officers of St. Clement Danes ' in which ps-' theatre is situated, who would recover them from Mr. the proprietor of the theatre. Ilarron-Gaansur.—Williont Shirley, with a wife and children, was yesterday charged by an informer of the Parsons, with selling earthenware about the streets, , licence. The charge being proved, the poor man was in the ntiliertied penalty of Ten Pounds, which not bein,, pay, he wag sentenced to Three Months imprisonment 11owe of Conceits/a. u m less tat ouple. e necessir, hien lA, .ittee was int of vies scum the pr opose. o the erten 'n nor in c o rnmiss I, granting • , u r s WOW WI! of th i iu ; ;,re th relief wt. • tae me charged 'sion to mo , or at I ;me, St mat Seal, ed by P uty was it London ;me upon • onen we hutches. • done. :s, but woi ;ut the ki quiry, it .rtioa of had not their al id was to .cr in the rrishes ar kin as ac inense of ith respe asure, ii . re: in b ;us Purls] es fora 'on mig! purpos ):11,1 be ' ;ens the .ens of ; d. L 'done or re the = way a rnbent v 'e patrol , tight tl t r district ch extet other c r merous wouli 1 ;) Is, one 0 , is plan, e of in to e new °aid bt it at wh;‘.l or divis In appoh ed s'l ,1114 7, ' ; sh, `d 's wllul le :cs on of , n of y kin :rates Ird v•rn L lr, he At comet 11;; ; ;e of i.e E aa ial :±out iple on :s levie ..11y Cc r:- on. f p v. ..Irch, v.:- 'need it the o .arn nj. uce, Ls- • ptini . e , c.: ). p . Iclte • 41 ac- res t ett- in IF° *lnc t iers •'; tv Soft it !iJ icies I 'fhc p r t l.e bi ri,utt , . 4 . . t . 1 • ; td seen t' i .i 11 asked 1 .i tiazd's, •i i • • stated, . , t have t,,L ! ay the t i,i ~1: • . until ' ' 1 il , Lei nut 4 S ; ou not ! I , COM- • 7 fair;' * l• , ' 3 raw- ~, • ' '• • • I . 1 ' t nwell. . :sour $ I • ' ' mach; 1 1 1 ething . : i.',. JI :h agi- it into I never • • 1 said ;' . r ' . could t'' ' : i o open . • • ', e her it . 1, 1 ~,,,! If; the iurder i • operty il g that t•1'• 1 ( J 4 k ad 2.13- • ; erty to fight it I tee his , I ' li a, near if ' . • : li f •i 1 V f .ad no 1 I it iiinself ' li prated i • • g coa- 1 1 i rith him i 1. 1 and y 6.1 1 I i being a ,S . . k . !1 other to 1 1 I the Sr- t 14 . ' crwards , where , at night. • as Is- i o- I 1 is such , ': 1 ' I the pre- . i but you ' 'r I commit 'i 1; 4 .1 :ourse of , ( e:. It cur that the cage arMng to t 1 1 I' • :ompany. t• ' 1 :' I ion a fu- i . iussey. s . , HOT BY 1 ( " Inquest • Borough, I 1 effects of i night last. .. daughter ley-street. in her fa- i: ti 1 ' risoner in . 1 her. She Ir .. , , 1 , ~, 1 g that her asekeefer, , ... of answer • . , and time : l ' , Fawcett, I . ' 1 the third t , tett, came I . 'airs Faw- . took from 7 i f as pointed I upon los I , t 1 t F. Oh!' and 1 i ;) him, :••.!td I and rap I . l :t. • . t - / to situated se down I ' , b. . ! ;"• ?" tairs : tilt,' piteous at I i • ,tr • .1 d Fawcett 0 1 s d most ir:- ,ed to him 1 , . 1 they lived . , 4 1 re seduce! bread pro- i I emands. • I I • t • 1 v last v. , :t.. . , isonts that ' . I ! l i he exarni- • r i f 1 • lower rib, ended hint I 1 • mservice. / t.l .eci the de- k. , 4 My father • ; j y , ; e deceased addressed • • r 1 i I 1 4 man who il an, and by I I 1 '‘ returned a 1 • 1 —Leon d• I , squalid ay- : i nding Gil- k 1 'nest, with . i 1, , vice, at the i • e. In de- I pel for the etuated to or having lii t i s , ng him the oceived to self at any -Yesterday .., the other ' t ',sew River it ertifizares a of l'Arlia:. 1 1 for afters- ad been on of the per- t t : s yesterday ire-place at '1 '0 quantity of 0 chimney, i 1 :.. .. e fire being to necessity / , certificates V ti wards from parish the . , i tr. Elliston, ~ d five small he name c f • , without a IA convicted t•ing a ,it• :0 . neat :n the i ; i • • _ _ ,r