Star. — London, England, 1818-06-08 00:00:00

*.s • la isr. TO 1 pectet event, tion.— . form' , the at con6d I fa tentio t your I to sec fullest my $ My princi and a I a on all City ; Instep unbiai intere To City tied p ment, this Lious Ma of col treat at the City Walb $ • A THC June, 1. mot tratk t ' nwa that at hu real: their tient sires 3. the < oru the until clio c 4 tete inn ti l his t was bens rial a pp i e b a it al coat sad 6 wit/ Hai Tee 1 ri ag S der s. sad TO havi I do DA' rich basL pow: the 1 the I r • of p pr..* airy cirlt her Al.ll Tt; A „ i. I hi ape: S be a d2p, sit as ing. f Ca / TC rie Co at trj for the t.o ~• _ • . Sit % % %ti.. • • * •• • GENERAL ELECTION. TO THE WORTHY AND INDEPENDENT LIVERY OF THE CITY OF LONDON. flzertmersr, HAVING the honour to be one of your Repre sentatives in the present Parliament, which it is ex pected will be very shortly ( dissolved; I entreat you, in that event, to place me again in the same high and distinguished situ:- tion.—l flatter myself that my conduct in Parliament has uur formly evinced the just settle I have ever entertained, as well as the gratitude I have ever felt for so important a nun having been confided to me. I further hope, that, by a constant, faithful, and zealous at tention to the duties resulting from the high station in which your kindness has placed me, I have had the good fortune so far to secure your good opinion, as to justify my soliciting, with the fullest anticipation of success, your Votes and Interest towards my Re..Elci.tiun. My conduct has, I trust, in no respect varied from those principles which I have ever avowed of loyalty to the King, and a steady attachment to our glorious Constitution. I can confidently assure you I have been sedulously watchful on all occasions to support the rights and privileges of this great City ; and most anxious, according to the faithful dictates of an independent mind, to support those measures which have, in my unbiassed judgment, been best calculated to promote the true interest of the Empire at large. - - To the Commercial, Trading, and Shipping interests of the City and Port of London, I have, on all occasions, by an unwea ried personal attendance and exertion, in my place in Parlia ment, done my utmost to redeem the pledge I made to you on this point, when you did me the honour to feud me to the House of Commons. Maintaining these sentiments, and having observed this line of conduct, I once more appear before you, and earnestly en treat that you will favour me with your Votes and Interest, at the ensuing Election of Representatives in Parliament for the City of London. I have the honour tO be, Gentlemen, your devoted and faithful Servant, Walbrook, sth June, 1818. JOHN ATKINS. • ALDERMAN THORP. AT a very numerous and respectable MEETING of the LIVERY of LONDON, Friends of Alderman THORP, held at the London Tavern, on Friday, the oth of June, 151 3, BOYCE COMBE, Esq. in the Chair, Resolved unanimously, 1. That a free Representasion of the People in Parliament is essential to the stability of the Throne, to an impartial adminis tration of justice, and to the security and welfare of the com munity. S. As Parliament is now about to be dissolved, it is desirable that the Livery of London should demonstrate to the Kingdom at large their reverence for the principles of the Constitution, as ritabllshed at the glorious Revolution of 1688, by conferring their suffrages on those Candidates whose disinterested exer tions, firmness, and independence have proved their anxious de sire to promote the public good. 3. That, in contemplating the services of Alderman Thorp,in the different situations which he has held in the Corporation, as one of its Common Council ; as Sheriff, wherein he manifested the utmost solicitude to alleviate the distress of the prisoners under his care, his exemplary discharge of the duties of that cline, as testified by the recorded and unanimous approbation of the Lives) , at large ; and as an upright and indefatigable Ma gistrate, at all times supporting every 'mason calculated to pro tect the rights and privileges of his Fellow-Citizens; his general knowledge of the commercial interests of this his native City; his suctions as a Member of the Irish Society, for which he was unanimously elected its Governor; and particularly for his becteliskei disposition, evinced by his support of numerous cha rt:able institutions of this Metropolis, combined with his unim peachable integrity and consistency of political conduct, in oppo. aim all unnecessary public expenditure, and suing his utmost endeavours to secure retrenchment and economy ; this Meeting it of opinion that Alderman Thorp is, eminently qualified to be come one of their Representatives for the City in Parliament, sad Is fully entitled to the support of the Livery of London. 4. That the present Meeting do act u a General Committee, with power to add to their number, and meet daily at the King's Head Tavern, Poultry, for the purpose of securing Alderman Therp's Election. S. That the Thanks of this Meeting be given to Boyce Combe, Req. for the able manner in which he has conducted the business of this day, and for the support he has given to the cause of in dependence. 6 That the fort;Jita; Resolutions be inserted in the Morning sad Evening Papers. B COMBE, Chairman. TO THE WORTHY AND INDEPENDENT LIVERY OF LON DON. Gasertataezu, DEEPLY impressed with gratitude by the Reso lutions which my Friends have this day adapted, and having the fullest confidence in their kind and zealous support, I do not hesitate for a moment to offer myself as a CANDI DATE at the prproaching General Election, for the high and kanuurable situation of one of your Representatives in Parlia ment. Firmly attached to our cocelhnt Constitution as es:a bashed at the glotious Revolution of 1688, I shall Invariably op pose any encroachntent ur n its great and valuable bulwarks, the Habeas Corpus Act, the Trial by Jury, and the Liberty of the Press—l shall, on all o:casions, prove myself the Rim friend of peace, economy, and retrenchment, and a reforfn in the re pr‘scntation of the people in Parliament, as indispensably neces slry to the prosperity of the Empire. Should I upon these pairs ciples be hotiumid with your support, and obtain that great ob ject ef my ambition, I skill cheerfully dedicate sn boot abilities, tine, and attention, to a faithful discharge of that important trust. 1 have the honour to be, tientlemen, lour faithful and obedient servant. Stl. June, 1818. JUIIN MOMAS 'IIIORP. TO THE LOYAL AND INDEPENDENT LIVERY OF THE CITY OF LONDON. C AFFEIt some earnest but unsuccessful endeavours, with several highly fit and respectable men of this Ctty, I, induce them to stand forward at this time, and solicit the Ito nctlr of Reptcsenthn you, in the Parliament about to be chosen, I have found myself unexpectedly pressed by many of your re. spe:table Body, and of my personal friends, to make, on this oc:asion, the tender of my humble services. shvAa this opinion, so fl attering for me as already expressed, be at or.ce supported by a more general approbation of the In. &pendent Liverymen of this City, I shall be eager to offer my sal to your choice, of which I should, with reason, be as proud as grateful, and world strive to manifest and prove these feel inga by the most diligent, zealous, and independent exertions fw the peculiar Rights and Interests of your ancient City and Corporadon, and for the general benefit of t he Empire.' I am, very sincerely, Gentlemen, Your most obedient, humble servant, 86, Lombard-street, t THOMAS ROWCROFT. June 6, 1818. S TO THE GENTLEMEN, CLERGY, and FREEHOL- DERS of the COUNTY of HUNTINGDON. GrarturssiN, SINCE I declared to you my intention of offering IL , myself as a Candidate for the County of Huntingdon, at the General Election, I have received such Battering encourage ment from many of the most respectable Gentlemen of the County, that I am induced to solicit the favour of your Votes as the approacliinz Election, with confident hopes of success. I trot you will have the goodness to make favourable allowances for the infirm Matte of my health, which may prevent toy having th•i honour of paying my respects in person to you individually, b;:it I hope nevertheless to 'receive your support on the ci.ty of tztlon.—l base the Isouisur to remain, Gentlemen, . - Year obedient h amble rravatit, KienSll•ln FREDLLICK LIONTAGIY. Juuc d, 1814. S PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, JUNE 6. ALM Bill. A Menage from the House of Commons intimated the wish Of that House to hold a conference with their Lordships on the subject of the Alien Bill. Their Lordships having expressed their intention to send an answer by messengers of their own, the deputation from the House of Commons retired. The Marquis of LANSDOWN, the Duke of MOWTROSIt. Lord Gaze, Lord LIVIRPOOL, Lord ILnmsnate, Lord Mammas, acid Lord Lantana, were then appointed to attend the confe rence; and a message was sent by the Usher of the Black Rod to the House of Commons, announcing their Lordships inten tion to attend the conference in the tainted Chamber. After the conference the Noble Lords returned to the House, and the Miequis of Lasranowe reported that the managers of the Lords had attended the managers of the Commons, and that Lord Bo:sum, on the part of the managers of the Commons, bad delivered to them the Alien Bill, and stated at the same time that the Commons disagreed to an Amendment made by their Lordships to that Bill. The Commons declined giving IM-reason for that disagreement, except that they considered their Lordships' amendment was inexpedient. Upon this Report halm road by the proper °lacer, Lard LIVERPOOL moved, that " this House do not insist ton its Amendment." The LORD CHANCELLOR having put the question, Earl' GREY rose, and expressed his surprise at the manner in wfiich the Report which had just been read had been received. The Bill in question had been sent down from that House to the lieuse of Commons, with a clause which had been introduced, with an express allegation that it was indispensable M give the Bill effect, and their Lordships were called upon, so important was the clause considered, to dispense with their usual forms in order that it might . be passed with the greater celerity. Notwithstar.ffing this proceeding, however, now that the Commons had thought proper to reject the clause, they were called upon, without any explanation, to subscribe to a resolution which militated entirely against their former opinions. For his own part, he thought the Bill was much improved by the omission of this clause, for he could not help coming to the conclu don, that it was not only impolitic, but unjust. He thought, in fact, that every thing which went to ren der the Bill inefficient would be productive of public advantage—(hcar, hear.) But when he recollected that a majority of that House had agreed to the bill in its amended form, he considered that the preser vation of their dignity, as a branch of the legisla ture, demanded some other course than that which had been taken. The House of Commons had not condescended to give any reason for their rejection of their amendment, and yet they were called upon, without explanation, to abandon it altogether—to abandon that without which it had been strongly urged the bill would be totally ineffective. The Noble Earl then proceeded to comment upon the im propriety of coming to this determination in the ab sence of those who had supported the, amendment, and who, to maintain their own consistency, ought at least to have an .sportunity of explaining the grounds, upon which they might be inclined to accede to this new proposition. With these feel ings, and with a view that the House should take the subject deliberately into their consideration, he begged to move an amendment to the motion tithe Noble Lord, " That the further consideration of ;his Report be deferred to Monday next, and that the Lords be summoned."—The question having been put upon this amendment, Lord LIVERPOOL said, that he was not pre pared to retract one word of the opinion he had given upon the importance of this clause. Both in point of policy and justice he considered it necessary to the protection of the natural rights of British sub jects. For if it were possible by a trick, such as this clause was meant to guard against, to enable a fo reigner to obtain all the rights of a natural-born subject, there would be an end of all their labours for a century past for the maintenance of those rights. There might be different opinions respecting the policy to be adopted in the admission of foreigners to the rights of natural-born subjects. Some might be for excluding them altogether ; others for admit. ting them under regulations more or less rigid—a third opinion might be that they should be admitted without any limitation. He was not now going to discuss which of these opinions was the most proper for a country to adopt; for whatever course might be thought preferable with respect to Aliens, all would agree that the legislation respecting them ought to be consistent, and that one law might not to be al lowed to counteract all the legislative regulations adopted on the subject of naturalization, so long as it was thought fit that these regulations should be continued. Indeed, when the clause was discussed by their Lordships, no one objected to it as a pros pective measure ; it was only its retrospective opera tion that had caused a difference of opinion. He could scarcely believe any individual existed who would say that a law should be suffered to remain in force by which any foreigner, however hostile and rancorously disposed towards this country, might, at the expense of 80/. obtain all the rights of a natu ral-born subject, without taking the oath of alle giance, or submitting to any of tht regulations and inquiries which the legislature thought proper to adopt in passing naturalization bills. This extraor dinary act was not known until April last. He would ask their Lordships whether any of them sup posed the existence of a measure by which a foreigner who had purchased stock to the extent of 80/. one day, might sell it the next to another, and natura lize him also, and thus make the rapid process of na turalization go on without limitation? He was too well convinced of the loyalty and patriotism of the other House of Parliament to suppose, that they would not apply a remedy to such a state of things. The reason assigned on the conference that the Com mons considered the amendment in the Bill inexpe dient, warranted the supposition he had made. This expression of their sentiments supported the opinion, that they would have no objection to accomplish the same object in another way. He had no doubt that the objection of the Commons did not apply to the clause substantially, but to its introduction into this particular bill. He therefore thought that a distinct measure, having the same object, would be ap proved both by their Lordships and elsewhere. On that ground he had recommended to their Lordships not to insist upon their amendments. Lord HOLLAND, were it not for the state of hu miliation in which the House was placed, would have been disposed to consider the whole proceedings relative to the clause in question rather as a subject for mirth and pleasantry, than for serious considera tion. The whole tendency of the Noble argu ment aimed at roving that their Lordships would have acted most prhposteeeesly had they not adopted this clause, and that the Commons have done wrong refusing to agree to it, .and yet he concluded with posing that it should now be rejected. The words use exped ient, it appeared, had damped his courage, lad he affects to believe that the Commons, who he infers have acted very absurdly, will, notwithstand ing, adopt what your Lordships are desired to reject. After boasting that he himself had retracted no cpi nioh, he had the singular modesty to ask their Lord ships to retract all theirs. He says, " You must now alter the opinions you have solemnly given on the subject, because the Commons, who have just given a proof of their disapprobation of your opinions, will be sure to take them up as soon as you your selves reject them." This was a strange sort of rea soning, and full of deep humiliation; but it is in the criminality more than in the inconsistency of the proceeding, that the humiliation is to be found. A gross violation of the rights of property was con tained in the clause which the Commons had re jected. The Noble Earl had more than once spoken of the trick and device by which, he asserted, certain aliens had attempted, since April last, under the Scotch Act of Parliament, to procure their natu ralization: but they had only availed themselves of an existing law : whereas the Noble Earl, in contra• diction to all the principles of law and justice, pro posed to deprive them of their property and rights. But let not their Lordships " lay the flattering unc tion to their soul," that this was merely au act of the Scotch Parliament. It was uo such thing, though, as an Act of the Scotch Parliament recognized by the Union, it was the law of the United Kingdom. It originated with the Scotch Parliament, but it was re• enacted by the British Parliament in the year 1774. The Noble Lord (Liverpool) said, he would call upon any person to say, whether he knew of the existence of this Act before the month of April last? Why should the Noble Earl ark that question, or why sup pose that the Act was unknown? Was it because the Noble Earl himself was in ignorance of it, that it should be unknown to every other person?—(kear.) But if it were true that nobody knew any thing oirl the Act, that would he a reason, not for adopting the Noble Earl's motion, but for entering into an inquiry on that point, previously to a full consideration of the whole subject. He knew not by what fatality it happened,•'lsut, fortunately, violence and injustice generally diteated their own purpose, and in this case Ministers had most completely defeated theniselves. He wished not to be understood as accusing their Lordships of either violence or injustice, but the whole transaction was of such a nature, that it una voidably excited in his mind the, consolatory feeling he had expressed. It was said, that the clause could not be looked upon as tending to an infraction of the rights of property ; that the law being long unknown and dormant, the repeal of it could produce no in jury to individuals. This, however, was all gratui tous assumption. It had never been proved that the law was unknown ; but, adniitting this assertion to be true, that was not a sufficient reason for the clause their Lordships had been induced to adopt. Igno rance of the law did not protect unfortunate mer for breaking it, and he did not understand why legisla tors, who did not know the law, which it was their duty to know, should make their ignorance an ex:use for depriving other men of their rights. The aliens' who had purchased shares in the Bank of Scotland, held that property by the same title that their Lord.; ships held their estates, namely, the sanction of law. The measure which the Noble Earl had supported rendered foreigners mere trustees at the will of the Crown, snd liable to the forfeiture of any land they may have become possessed of. When the Noble Earl was formerly urging their Lordships to adopt the clause, he declared he was quite impatient, under the existence of a law, the effect of which was, if acted upon, to give the rights of free-born subjects to any foreigners, without being compelled to take an oath of allegiance, or without any obligation to perform any of the duties of a subject. He was before an xious for its repeal, not only prospectively, but retro vectively ; and nothing would sateity him short of the disfranchisement ct all the individuals who had obtained legal rights under the Scotch Act, since the 28th of April. Now, however, he was more mode rate, he was content to mix a little water with his wine. —(A laugh.)—The retrospective part of the clause, which he now spoke of as a little matter by the by, was to be omitted. In fact, the only con sistent part of the Noble Earl's conduct was his pre cipitation and impatience. He bad been all impa tience to get the clause passed, and he was now in an equal hurry to get it rejected. lf, however, their Lordships must stand in a white sheet on this occasion, (a laugh 1, he thought it becoming that they should go through the work cif repentance with due delibe. ration and solemnity, and would therefore =I his Noble Friend's motion, for the farther co tion of the subiect on Monday. The Marquis of LANSDOWN said, that upon a former occasion lie admitted that thwfacility allowed' to foreigners by this Act of the Scotch Parliament should not be allowed to exist. He was still of the sum: opinion ; but he never thought that, in justice, the repeal of it should be prospective, nor retrospec tive. It would he a gtrat injustice, a complete spo liation of rights, to deprive foreigners of the advan tages they enjoyed under a 3 Act passed for many years, recognized by the British Parliament, and un der which they had acquired property. Foreigners : became possessed of rights under this Act, in the same way as all other rights were obtaiiiel—by law. It was attempted to justify the repeal of this Act upon the ground that it had fallen into disuse, and was quite unknown. Such was not the case. The ex istence of the law was well known, and though per-1 sons not immediately interested in it might not have been aware of its existence, it was familiar to ninny, as well as to those who had acquired property under it as to otheri. The best mode, in his opinion, would he to adjourn the consideration of this question to a further period. By that means they would give time for the introduction of a new Bill, which might be carried regularly through all the stages in both Houses. What had occurred on this occasion was an addition to the many proofs that the privileges of the two houses of Parliament tended greatly to pub lic utility, though their exercise might occasionally be attended with some inconvenience. Lord HARROWBY, (who had entc.red the Home while Lord Holland was speaking,) supported the motion of his Noble Friend Wm Larl of Lim pool.) He saw no injustice is: the fees re sith:ch adopted by the Douse. A law allowing o l d" lities to foreigneis as the Scotch Act of Parliosft did, should not be allowed to exist. It w 4 more than a private Act, passed more than ago for a local object. It was now brottield their Lordship? notice for a particular purpo se ,' having for a long time remained forgotte n , and most completely unknown. Ile did siotlu te d who made the discovery of the Acts upon sefi e y objection to then Lordships amendment s we re ded but the conduct of the Noble Lord opmi l i most singular ; for, after resisting the than peep sed, he now objects to their Lordship' resc i tis , The Noble Lord had c omm ente d co the elm ,731 'expedient," ir. the answer of the Cororm in , tow h ica his Noble Friend had alluded ; but, in i ce, t ittle the common expreniou employed on suck ce„ al k t . it was therefore very extraordinary that the Lord should think fit to found any argument es words. With regard to what had beta raid to subject of the Act of 1794, he was ;stns.:led tt z when that Act passed, the tendency of the Ise: , Scotch Parliament must have escaped observatk Lord HOLLAND perceived that the Nobel who spoke last wished to charge him w. f.: sister cy, while his only object was to rescue Me ps. ceedings of the House from that charge. Tr.( Ntai Lord ought also to be informed, that be had is—i, j no argument on the words " not expedient." 11! Noble Lord said that was the common esprzi z used on such occasions: if it was so, it was Cue not extraordinary that the Noble Lord at the h..:1 Treasury should have quoted that expressim. der to induce their Lordships to believe the Commons had no objection to another meanue, tinct from the Alien Bill. If the Noble Lord fit to speak on. entering the House in the middle a debate, he should take care what argsment: used, for he could not tell how they sere whit the present case they went all against :Le :;:61r: on the bench beside him. For his Fr-L.:could= suppsc tiat the British Parliament so fu ne7' its duty as to pass the Act of 1774,wcr . enat into consideration the Scotch Act wh i c h was confirmed. The object of Ministers in:l:e ten, tive clause was nothing more nor less tLan pan Act of pains and penalties without any coitus* or even the allegation of any cr.rainahty, agaisti individuals who were to be affected by that an measure. The Earl of LAUDERDAL not have troubled their Lordshi tions, were it not for some out, which he could not allo-.v The Noble Earl (Liverpooll del that he knew this to be the la: 'last. Ile could assure the N well aware of the exis:ence of s Lord, a friend of his, lnew that, had stated to him many months the law. There was not a Bank of Scotland, or as (mint with that Bank, who was not as.. a mere dormant Act, or one our& the Parliament of ScclLtr.d. 'confirmed by various etc of tit It was so recort.i it d the 14th, the king. It Was said tc be a p: ? inch thing. It had I: een long a feigners had purchased propertl and it would be most unjust to spectively of its benefits. It was upon the Statute Book, but li'n persons were not immediately , been adverted to. The Noble Eat not conclude, from his own others were in the same predii part, he was well aware that ted, but. he did not consider hi; communicate the circumstance, that he had given an opportani Amendment, which was rejected The House then divided upon ment as follows :—Contents 21 Majority 11.—The origir.ai motif and the House Adjourned. BOCSE OF C 031310: The Ikuse met at the usual moo. 31r. IX. SNIITII said, he had, thrt.l sent Session, allowed the A.' on the I take its own course; only a few cowl had this day had a statement put into he moddered roe of pect.lia hard, this day btea made to the Cost of en-dints in this ease aside, bu• 'tie gro , lnd of the application ie in, t:4O tautly justified in this rfutal; net he eaused the poor wenne. is. t been taken km consist( a•:v!.; her the embarrassed state cf her affairs application. II L.• shotid have the l'arliaineet, be would 1..1 :all to bii the acttst. _ A Message from the Hquse attendance of the Muse t.. a Chamber, upon the subject c the Ilouse to the Lords Amend aiessAcm Ti A Committee of M.etaLet listing of the followi:tg and c Lord __ ltre Cr_rrttl.. Mr. lhar.ht.rv, I.t.rettlstltn_ark, The Arturne7-l-ener-.1, Mr. ritrner, On their return fro:r NING, on the part of Managers on the pain e : reasons assigned by the ( Lordships Arr.m..uie: ships were about to tai. tie PuL• DUKE AND ih:t t 1 t Lord CASTLEREM ill, house for not bringin;f li. meant to conclude tbrwa:,! of Congratulation to his !loyal Regent, and to her Majc%ty. of the Duke and Duchtss et t'. n•'• ship also moved an Addrc:.• their Royal Highnesses the Dek their Marriage. The three motio:, . agreed to, and Members appoin:cd to cat., dresses to the Prince Regent, the Queer, Royal Highnesses. WATER COMPANIKE , Mr. M. A. TAYLOR gave uatice that he in the early part of uo,t I;isivo, m ove for nUUCC to inquiry iuto the prcscut mnde • riristreihtialActi:cartwiwEoinn,:gclpt,il:4:lscli.dlll6-1° to, aist. it was l " motet/13n 1:0 46 7 1 , dm uow hroa is k ' usoi ss ed f oremen, 4 ‘r a 4 d e did not ],.,,me thp • Acts upo n wilicit tit ruendrnent s were fla g , able Lord opposite • tin clause the cla 111 . Prel* • ordships res s i s il„ td cc the %% c i s IC Cuppr min, to 2 1/3 t but, in h e . "wch - ed 7 " tit"' 4 1:1uptA denary this tle 'a any argument e t had bees raid It • u ea the e was ;emu:Jed tl x ..1 [envy of th e ;act escaped cbserrat,r.. that the NOcle is ! i • Large him was to rescue Cie pe. it charge. Tee n;4.: 2 1, the: he had not expedient." rt ! • cominon esp rss i s. . 'if 60, it leas the e ms .ord at the hezi cf t hat etPrecioz. sr.. v • sto believe thit ta• U. another meat e, M. ta ie Noble Lord thota Ins louse in the middl e .0 re what "Pm= • e r they rete to hit In. -ra against tle :;t:bk Lord i.e r his par... L ewd nos ;In sment so far negle ct ed 1774, we wes s s ak i fi r Act 'thick was ewe r di! sisters in !Ile retospe. TI mor less ti.aa pas a pl• ithout any crimioaks, agaiat z tic affected by that az, , . at cf LE said, that he ttatirj hips with any oases:. tiri ideas that were thrm to s• to pass in silence- Iv eEed any person tau,, hi zw of the ILid is Ao ;dile Earl that be n it such a Lw. A ce at he (Lord Laudelasi H its back that suit re to single Director ci M pi nent lawyer convex; cc liWirt of it. It was::: de nerely emanating I:cei It was recognized ti is: the British Pa-liastr- s the pith. and de!-: private Act : it a 7; as acted upon. Mar !.• F! :sty upon the faith d; to deprive them rest• th .as as pub:Ls as aay re many airs is N interested. it haa a t P Earl (Liyerpoilarl as ignorance it• c t.at LI icanient. Far f.t., usa .1 4 1 a law of the kirdein• himself called spate I e, and be was ss a way a unity for pcopos : 7 dr & Led ly the ot h er time a in Lord Gates IMO 21—Non-mace% fe- I notion was dam canal, t 1 DNS. JZ:::2 C. rues da come of thin. P subiect et 'smut mplainet b,d artme, to his hiett ts s c..•: •e• An bppix4 B4 Mi 1 Lieheyrr to he at t Coat bid t• tried., • P Lle. 1 ill Cqnrt it thoe7te the entr.. - the applicitic3 : t • Id Ft, • • • • Marie ci . lint the e of Lords rminter 2 :Infetecce in the I . L. cf the disarftal P ' &Dents of the Ain :- TUE LORD:- apiointe , :,ther s:r J. ; • • I. • 1-$ 7 l , 1 1 :•••• • I.• .I received:: ...• . .. 7 reje.ting • • a . 'ti their La. : 4.:es.tti• - .... (4. f. r ;zing F !;,:xis with Whtic r.sos,:d Nal:nets the i on ;L. l•arrY Ty! • ze. lii• Dyke and Du.•'• .Cods were unara:r2 • pointed to car: is• • t, the Quec• l , • r.Pl):lrfr. 'c uatice that he v •• sion, n %erre for a :Neut mode c t sai, •