Star. — London, England, 1824-06-03 00:00:00

1..1.'{' itEl'6,'/: T. rnEitoGATtvE COURT, JUNE 2. L^cxt: v. DENN::r. This WAS a suit i i which two wills of the late Mrs. Sarah Locke, wife of the Rev. Dr. Locke, of Fareham, in Hampshire, were pronolnded. Site died on the 11th of June, 1:321, having the day before, as it was alleged, executed a will to which she put her mark, in the pre sence of three of Dr. Locke's servants, by which she bequeathed her property to her husband, and appointed him sole executor. It appeared al'.o, that she made a will on the 28th of May, 1819, in which she appointed her nephew, Thomas Denner, sole executor, for whose trouble she becprekithed him 200/. In this instrument ail her brothers and sisters, as well as the children of her deceased brothers and sisters, were well provided for, whose interest by the last document was taken away.—Mr. Denner, therefore, as the trustee for the persons interested in the will of 1819, propounded that will in opposition to the one of 1821, propounded by 1)r. Locke. The property of the deceased, who was a very illiterate woman, appeared to be very considerable; she was formerly married to a person named Clinch, a coachman, who subsequently became a coachmaster, and bequeathed all his property to her. She married 1)r. Locke in 1810, at which time part of her property, 17,5001. was in Consols. and 6,5001. on mortgage. These sums were secured to her by settlement, but va 3ionsly di posed of aftersa:ds by the two wills. Dr. LUAIINGION appeared for Dr. Locke, and Dr. JENNett for Mr. Denner.—Sentence on a future day. HIGH COURT OF DELEGATES. BRING() AGAINST SHISCO. This very long depending suit was originally insti tuted in the Consistory Court of London, so long ago as Hilary Term, 1814.; and was promoted by Lady Sarah 13risco; against Sir Wastel Brisco, Bart. her husband, for a divot ce and separation, by reason of cruelty and adultery by him committed. In the Consistory Court, a variety of proceedings were had, up to the month of April, 1818 ; and in the intervening period, Lady Bris co's libel, charging the facts upon which she prayed a divorce, and an allegation of faculties (i.e. of income and pecuniary means), wet e brought in by her Ladyship's Proctor, and admitted. Sir Waqtsl (admitting the mar-, riage, but otherwise giving a negative issue), brought in his answers thereto, and his amended answers ; and ali mony "pendente lire" was allotted by the Court to Lady Brisco. An allegat inn was afterwards brought in on behalf of Sir Wastel lliisco, pleading in bar of this suit certain acts of adultery alleged to have been committed by • -Lady Brisco, denying the charges cemained in her libel, and praying a divorce from her Ladyship. Upon the libel of Lady Brisco (the substance of which we have se veral times stated) seventeen witnesses were examined, and upon this allegation of Sir Waste), thirteen. The latter was argued at considerable length, directed to be reformed, and subsequently admitted- Further allega tions and answers, and exhibits (letters, &c.) were brought in, and alimony was continued to Lady Brisco. Some of the articles of an allegation submitted to the Court by the Proctor for her Ladyship having been re jected, the Prcrctor appealed the cause to the Arches' Court of Canterbury, in April, 1818: In that Court proceedings were cont i nued till June, 1819, when, on the 21th of June (Tiinity Term) Mr. Registrar informed the Judge that he had been served with an inhibition, tinder the seal of tl,e High Court of Delegates, to sairich• tribanal the cause was accordingly remitted.— From ,idly, 1819, to April. 1820, the pi his ipal steps that were taken before the whole commission forming this high Court (at Seijeants' Inn), or before the Con. Dele gates at Doctors Commons, were, that on behalf of Sir Wastel Brisco a libel of appeal was given ; and on be half of his Lady, a negative issue to it; and the whole Commission pronounced against the appeal from the Arches' (which was from a further allotment of alimony to the wile during the suit), and found that the Learned Judge of that Court had rightly Enoceeded ; but at the petition of both parties, they retained the principal cause, decreeing a monition against the husband for payment of costs, and also for 350/. arrears of alimony. This monition having issued, and Sir Wastel not appearing, the Judges Con-Delegates pronounced him to be con tumacious; and such contempt being signified, a writ issued against hint, in due course o de contumace capi cado," and in May, 182'2, he was arrested ; but in No vember following, he appeared in Court, and alleging that he had paid such costs and alimony, and was ready to take the usual oath to obey the lawful command of the Court in future, he was absolved from his contempt. The Proctor for his Lady then prayed a further moni tion against him for payment of 5001. arrears of alimony, which had accrued since April, 1820, when he was pro nounced contumacious. Sir Wastel was heard on his Petition against this payment ; but on the first Session of Easter Term, 1823, the Con-Delegates assigned him to pay the balance of said 5001. he having in the interim paid 2501. on account. A further allegation, exceptive to the cr edit of witnesses, &c. was this day offered on the part of Lady Brisco. Her Ladyship's Counsel, Dr.Austorso,Dr.JENsr.n, and Mr. K NIGIIT, were heard in support of this allegation. Dr.l'it 11.1.1;VMM, DT.LUSIIINGTON, and Mr.Bnouc. rtA the Cfarnsel for Sir Wastel Brisco, after an argument of some length, with the sanction of this Court, consented to the admission of the allegation ; and that now stand ing for proof,the cause is definitively assigned for hearing and sentence in its next stage. The Commission was filled by Mr. Justice I3unnouctr, Baron GA R HOW, Mr. Justice Bur, and Drs. DAUISENY, GOTL INC:, I)6DSON, MI:YRICK, and J. ADDAms. coNsisToßY couRT. TILE OFFICE OF JUDGE PROMOTED BY RUST AND ADAMS V. THE REV. DR. CLARKE. D:. LUSUINGTON said, this was a suit promoted by 31cArs. Rost and Adams, Churchwardens of Great Walton, Essex, against the Rev. George Somers Clark, D.D. Vicar of that Paiish, for neglect of duty, inter ruptions and brawling, in the church, incontinence, &c. The decree was served on Dr. Clark on the 9th of Februaty last, but no appearance having been made, the articles stood for admission. The Learned Advo cate then tend the articles; they charged him with neglecting and telthing to bury and baptise persons, tvi,ll *closing to perform divine worship, and with brawling and disturbing the congregation ; for which he had been suspended from the performance of all public teligious rites for twelve months, which suspension had been publicly read in the dutch.— Also, that during his suspension, he refused to admit the Rev. Godfrey liticl, junior, to baptise two children, and 41 - .0 refused to deliver up the keys of the church for that purpose, which obliged the Churchwardens to force open the dorms ; when applied to by them for the keys, he banged the door in their faces. On Sunday, - the 3d of August, after the Sacrament w:s adroirds; tered, he advanced to the commuiion-table in an iLre verent manner, and forcibly carried away the money which had been collected ; and, on the same day, dur ing Mr. Bird's preaching, he violently shut his Bible, which occasioned a noise in the church; and that he (Dr. Clark), being a married man, did associate with common prostitute , . Sir CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON said, the articles pre sented a most melancholy picture of perverse and wicked conduct in this poor unfortunate man, mho, for the last three or four years, had done everything pose sible to pervert his holy office, and induce his pa rishioners to leave their Church and their Religion. It was hardly possible for conduct to be more mischievous than this : he had by such conduct, and by his neglect ing to appear to the decrees of the Court, eshiliited a contumacious resistance of the authority of the Court. Of course, the articles must be admitted ; but he (Sir Chi istopher) believed that he was under confinement. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 2. PARKINS V. CORBETT. Mr. Serjeant Vaucitaa stated that this was an action to recover the value of a horse sold to the defendant. It appeared, that one day Mr. Parkins, taking a ride out to Kensington, called on Mr. Cobbett, who seemed much delighted with the horse on which Mr. Parkins rode, and expressed a wish to purchase it. The horse was an excellent hunter, and as Mr. Cobbett had a great aversion to turnpikes, be wanted a horse that would. early him over turnpike gates, toll-free. It was cer tainly very hard for Mr. Cobbett, mho had expressed in one of his publications the great pleasure he felt in taking a rural ride into the country—it was study very hard for a Gentleman of his rural habits to be annoyed by the unsentimental demand of two pence for a toll ! \o; he would get himself a hunter that could carry him from one end of the kingdom to the other free of all kinds of tolls and turnpikes (Laughter).—He pur chased this horse from Mr. Parkins for 401. and after having used him for six months, he then returned the horse to the plaintiff, as being of ao further service.— The horse was disabled, broken kneed, and in a very bad condition. John Thorne, groom to Mr. Parkins; and William Clarke, hostler at the Red Hart Livery Stables, stated in evidence that the horse was sold on the 11th of Sept. 1822, and returned about six months afterwards. The horse was aged, three-parts blood, and in their opinion was wo:th from 40 to 50 guineas. Clarke said, that the horse was sent to the stables, whither Mr. Cobbett came :rime, and, after riding the horse, asked the witness's opinion of his worth; on hearing which he ordered the horse to be booked in his name. Mr. Serjeant PELL was sorry that his Learned Fi lend, Mr. Seijeant Vaughan, had unnecessarily mixed the character of the parties vt ith this transaction, which was simply a private one. The parties were both known to the public, and as such any transaction respecting them naturally excited interest. Mr. Cobbett had very pro perly taken notice of certain turnpikes, and had written much that benefitted tke public—politics apart—on which be would give no opinion. But in this case, the only witness that touched the sale of the horse was Clarke, whose evidence would be proved to be entirely false. The horse was not sold, but lent to Mr. Cobbett. Mr. Cobbett and Mr. Parkins were on frienAy terms, till a trial respecting Byrne took place, in which Mr. Cobbett gave evidence adverse to Mr. Parkins. This was the true cause for bringing the present action. The horse was lent in 1322, and this action was brought in-1824. If the horse had been sold, why was not this action brought long before? Mr. William Cobbett, jun. examined.—ln 1.822, Mr. Parkins came to my father respecting Byrne's business, but my father having then no time, he said he was going into the country on business, and asked Mr. Par kins to recommend him a good horse. Mr. Parkins said he had the very thing ; he was once a hunter, but was now a good roadster, and would suit my father very well. Mr. Parkins shortly after told me that the horse's near fore leg was strained, in consequence of leaping a hedge, by which it fell on a flint. The effect was, that the elasticity necessary for leaping was de stroyed ; the horse was then twelve years old. My father asked Mr. Parkins what would be price of the horse in the event of his liking him? Mr. Parkins de clined stating any price, but told my father to keep the horse as long as he liked. The horse was given on trial, but not sold. My father never rode the horse but once, on the evening it was sent to the stable, and then only in the stable-yard. I rode the horse occasionally. Mr. Serjeant PELL said, that several letters passell between him and Mr. Cobbett, jun. respecting the horse. A letter from Mr. Parkins was, however, lost, which caused a good deal of altercation. In one letter Mr. Parkins highly eulogized the horse, styling him a 2 noble," and a "generous" creature. It was perhaps, in his opinion, fit to be the war-horse of Julius CXiat but, according to all accounts, it was the veriest hack that ever tramped a turnpike road—(Laughter)—lame of one leg, hobbling, and constantly stumbling on the others, and capable of breaking the neck of any person who ventured on his back, with the exception of Mr. Parkins hi mself—(Laughter). Other witnesses were called, one of whom, a Captain of Artillery, said he did not think the horse worth 101. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN replied. The CHIEF JUSTICE read over his notes, commenting on the evidence as he went along. He remarked, that there was conflicting evidence between the two parties. Two witnesses swore that the horse had been sold, and Mr. Cobbett, jun. on the other side, as flatly denied the sale. It appeared the horse was unsafe for riding, and only fit for general purposes. It was said to be worth 401. Now ►f the Jury thought a sale had taken place, they would find a verdict for the plaintiff. But if they thought the horse had been only lent, they would then find for the defendant. One thing was clear, that the I►wse, if lent, had been kept a long while, and returned in a much worse condition, having his knee re-cut by a fall. From the notoriety of the patties, the trial had lasted nearly the whole day, which was so much time los:, as the case, if the parties were unknown, might have been settled in two hours. The JUry consulted for a few minutes, and returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 401. costs 40s. Mr. Parkins was in Court all day, and bowed his thanks to the Jury with much self-satisfaction. 11W 1 '• JOHNSON V. BURGESS. This was an action bruught by Johnson, the plaintiff, against the defendant, to recover a compensation for the damage he bad sustained inconsequence of the negli gence of the defendant's servant, who had driven a horse and cart belonging to defendant against the horse of the plaintiff, by which that animal was so much in jured that be died. The Jury found for the plaintiff— Damages, 30/. NthNMI V. CTIOYONS. Mr. SCARLETT stated that this was an acti..n to ie cover the sum of 61. ss. for the education of the defen dant's daughter. Verdict fur plaintiff—Damages, 6/.55. TRAIL V. GOUGE. Mr. Serjeant PELT. stated that this was an action for the loss of a horse, valued at 601. The plaintiff is pro prietor of a Clapham stage, the defendant is a banker's clerk. About six o'clock on the evening of the 12th De cember last, the plaintiff and another person were riding from Camberwell towards Walworth, and the defendant was driving in a gig at the rate of nine miles an hour on the wrong side of the road, and drove the shaft of the gig into the side of the plaintiff's horse, bieal.irg one of his ribs, through which be died in - a few hours._ The Jury consulted for a short time, and returned a var dict for the plaintiff—Daspages 151. WILLIS V. DE THIERRY. This was an action to recover the sum of 32/. 18s. the amount of a tailor's bill. The plaintiff resides in St. James's-street, and the defendant, Mr. James De Thierry, is the brother of Charles Baron De Thierr y, a French Nobleman, who at the time this debt was con traced (in April, 1592), resided at Cambridge. The defence set up vas, first, that the defendant was a minor; secondly, that the debt was contracted by the Dowager Baroness De Thierry, and not by the de fendant; and thirdly, that a contract was made at the time the goods were ordered that twelve months credit should be given. J. Emmerson, the foreman of the plaintiff, stated, that he went to Carnbri.iLre in April, and was intro duced to the plaintiff by the recommendatory letter of a friend. Tire articles were charged the usual West end prices: A• dress coat and silk collar, 51. 101. dress trowsers 91.115. two pair of brown duck trowq.rs 3/. Ss. These were fair and reasonable prices —(.4 birV,). The Jury gave a verdict for the whole sum claimed. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, JUNE 2. Thomas Coles wasindictedfor perjury. Mr. Cuawoon said his clieni was a young man, named Gill, who entered into business, as a woollen draper, on Snow-hill, in January, 1821 ; shortly after wards he married 'a young Lady, entitled to 1,0001. on her wedding-day. This induced Mr. Gill to move from Snow-hill to Cloth-fair, for the purpose of increasing his business. But the fortune of hi; wife became a matter of litigation in the Court of Chancery, and he had, in depending upon it, entered into a more extended scale cf business than his capital would admit, and he got consequently involved in debt, and applied to the de fendant (Coles), who was a monied man, married to a sister of James Gill's wife, and was at the time Clerk of the Works carrying on in the Regent's Park. This ap plication for 4001. or 500/. was made in February, 1822, to Mr. Coles, who offered him 4001. for twelve months, at the rate of 25 per cent. per annum. Gili refused to give so great a consideration; but his difficul ties increasing, he at last agreed, and, in March, 1822, 4001. was given to Gill, who gave his warrant of at torney to the defendant for 4771. which with the interest at 5 per cent. would, at the end of twelve months, amount to 5001. 17s. In September, 1822, Gill was ar rested, and he disclosed his affairs to Coles, who entered up judgment, and sold property of Gill's to the amount of 1,0001. The other creditors of Gill brought the sub ject before the Court of Common Picas, and the defen dant Coles answered by ao affidavit, swearing most po sitively that be paid Gill 477/. in Bank of England notes. This was the perjury assigned to the defendant. James Gill corroborated Mr. Curwood's address to the Jury—On cross-examination, witness stated that the warrant of attorney was drawn up for 4771. by his own Solicitor.—Mrs. Gill, wife of the witness, was present on the Ist of March, 1822, when Mr. Coles paid her hus band 4001. in Bank of England notes. He counted the notes after Mr. Coles, and handed them to her ; she counted them, and lodged them in a place of safety up stairs. Robert Gill was present at his brother's house on the day when Mr. Coles lent his brother James 4001. Mr. ALLEY made a long defence for Coles; after which Mr. A DOLPIIUS called Mr. Phillip Brooke, a tailor, in Foley-place. He knows Robert Gill ; he heard him say that his brother James borrowed money from Mr. Coles, but he did not know how much.--Not Guilty. FUNERAL OF MR. HARRIS. Yesterday being appointed ft.r the funeral of the above unfortunate Gentleman, every prep aration was made to remove his remains to their last abode, i and the interest excited on the occasion was so excessive, that or hours before the melancholy procession took place, crowds of persons began to assemble round his late re sidence in London -street, Tottenham-court-road, which was rendered completely impassable until four o'clock, when all the necessary arrangements were completed for the funeral. A feeling of commiseration seemed to diffuse itself among the spectators, in consequence of the lamentable cause of his dissolution, and the distress ing situation of his wife and family. The mourners, among whom were sever al of the de ceased's relatives, attended during the whole of the day. At about three o'clock the undertaker arrived, with two mutes, who were in their robes, and stationed themselves at the door, while the undertaker, &c. fas tened the coffin, and adjusted the mourners. By four o'clock the coffin was brought from the house, and bore an inscription of the name, age, and the day of the de ceased's death. It was covered with a rich pall, aad supported by four individuals. The procession was preceded by the undertaker and two mutes, with staves. The mourners consisted of twelve persons, headed by Mrs. Harris and her dari:,h ter, a fine girl, about twelve or thirteen years 61 . age. The procession moved slowly on, down Tottenllam court-road, Hampstead-road, and so on, until ti k ey ar rived at St. James's Chapel, Hampstead-road, vv/; , A-e r he remains of the deceased were deposited in a deep grave. The church-yard was excessively crowded, and dur ing the procession, the heads of the inhabitants were protruding hum their w indows tc the extent of the streets to view the ceremony ; and the throng pressed forward with so touch anxiety to gain a glare,: uf the wife and child, that they had some difficulty to proceed. Mr. KEW, the tragedian, crossed from Brighton to Dieppe, in an ppm boat, with borne Gentkm::: hunt Hull, on Friday last. An Order of the Treasury for the Duchies of Schles wick and Holstein has been published, by which eve; y retail dealer in silk, linen, woollen, and cotton goods is bound to prove before the local Magistrates, by the re ceipts of a national manufactory, that he has purchased for •his shop, every year, goods manufactured in the kingdom to the value of 160 (201.) yr - ; LONDON MEM A NICV I NSTII UT 10::. The Members of this Society held t:r7.ir gnat.. • General Meeting last night, to receive the Ren the Committee and the Auditors' Retort. The 1 , E!!, gave an account of the proceeditvs and funds oi Society up to the present time, an.l the ruld er Member,. Since the last Repel t the, c have 1 , - e , l wards of one hundred Members ad.ictl to ti,t and the funds in lnlnd tv. ,, oiin. to uvw ., %'.,1,/ The Auditors reporte,!, that theie was utoronunzev seF'xd by the Society t!.an coll . :a he ac::o..!iit„+, which, as the President exphined, was owiii, z names of lorne FlIbECTIbel s and doimrs net'. inserted. Both Rci.orts were received w:01 tisfaction. The Thanks of the Society we: e to the Vice-Pre-a:lents and Committee, and in Mr. M‘Wiwitm thanked the Meeting. Tlse the Society were then cordially given to the JOHN Smrrit, F. M.P. GnoTe, j , in;or, Wm. Ews, Esq. The latter Gentleman ex i acknow:ed i 4ments to the leuring. 't•l n tium%s Society were then given to HENRY M.P. and the ether Trustees, for their exert;ons in half of the Institozion. Mr BROUGHAM said he was gratifi...d Iv 0 :e !!„,:::; of the Meeting, hut never were th:u.k le.,i He had received a great deal of plen.,toe al! en ,•;„ the meetings of the Saciety, Which he iv.d done :;sorer as possible, and been both delighted ar.d The thanks of the Meeting were ',h.%) ! ;iven to :it. .r. C. RoitrArrsoN and `Jr. T. lioncsictx, the roma. Secietaries of the Society, for their exertins blishing the Society, and for the unremitting 7.?;t1 : : : , 1 disinterestedness with wh;ch they devoted their time t o promoting its success. The honour was acknowleaged by Mr. Itetrttri.ix, in areat speoch. The thanks cf the Society were then wa:mly be. stowed on Dr. llinknecK, the President, and he com plimented the Society in a neat speech, a:,suring t;:pm that there could now be no doubt of the Society obtitit ing the most complete succe,s. The Meeting, which was very numerous, then diE persed in petlect order. POLICE IN! ELL MLA CR. curr .nrr.ar.r.. 117M‘rtit irmaa to Mt. 'A%ters, ccile merchant, Ti Old Woad -street, and one Charles Ileirwm!, w e re c !, :lrg ,„4 , 04: former with stealing a quantity of wine which lit: had ken ita ployed to bottle off• at Mr. Sivev..riglit's, Taslstock-squ-re, and tle LULL - with receiving the proycrty. Turner had tchcg sonse fellercr with hint to assist him, and while the party v: ere quitticg the house, the tt.il °None uf their pockets can in contact WWI the f7Ca railing, and the steps were iast.intly deluged with the contra:, bottle of port. Inquiry skewed much wine had Turner confessed he had sent it to B:rnard. This c - iittein•tu, however, bring obtained under a promise that it would I.e ti,:ter for him, no use could he made of it against him, tier could !.ay cv..- roborative circumstances to obtained to crimin ,te the other sinter, and they were therefore both necessarily dischar:;:.d. • •, (41111-'• : Rep p, he l•r• • ti ter • I —e,i • 1 .1 11 if tnr,cy i 0 . 1,11., 5t....; [IIC • ••' die ,• lag r •_ s d toi.s I.Vtl, ins in ' sal tt:e de•e: ;fl . LIC O;en 161 vctl to :11*. former i• 1 e lll4 ze:ti 4111 0 01 , iirt to [!krrtri mly he corn. Ng ring tin , rn /11 °bun-, II ATTON-G T 1 D C. Peale, ll'. Walker, Tirtfr„T. urgers, an•! .7. nos!, ware charged with stealing fur ala4iers' ciiamends, and a I.,rJe of !red, the property of Mr. Celli, floson:nn-str.•et. c.*:, only eleven ye:as of :.ge, was an evi•!yi ce. z the other prisoner's through his father's house (next door to the proc. cutor, and was taken with a quantity of lead, which ire was cca veying to some brick fields, whi:e they were to divide the hi:o:y. The tour fortner were remanded, and the faiber of th Later, a very respectable man, was hound for his son's appearance. TII.IIIES por.tcE. Yesterday, Robot 117ii3icid, a watchman in the employ of El- - Majesty's Commissioners of Excise, appeared at nllh hest ,- e W. DALLANTINE, Esq. the pre.iding M gistrate, on a chars.;f fe lony, under the following circurnstanc,l. Mr. John Harding, an Inspector of the River, deposed :hat he resides on Hartshorn Wharf, in the pee: inct of St. Citherin, at..l is in the employ of his Majesty's Comnii—ion:rs of. 'e:s.cise. :nod that between the hours of three and four o'clock yesterd:ly morning, saw the prisoner in the act of drawing spirits from casks 7,1 the wharf; that he hastened to the spot, seized the spit - ifs, and information at this office to have the prisoner apprehended. Magistrate—What quantity did you seize? Witness—Two skins, containing one gallon and a half of brand:, and two jars containing half a gallon of foreign geneva. Magistrate-11°w long has the prisoner held his situation Witness—Upwards of two years, and up to the present time• I had the greatest confidence in him. Magistrate—What salary does lie receive? Witness—Fourteen shillings per week wages, and £35 per an num salary. The prisoner was then called upon for his defence, and declinia; to make any, was fully committed to Newgate for TOWN-HALL. Three powerful Irishmen, named Ileolliolontrw Hurley, Michad Touney, and William Disco!, were charged as ringleaders in a Liu:, in Greta-alley, 'Tuley-street. The disturbance originated in a party feud, the continued source of bloodshed and disorder in the neighbour hood, and according t.: the evidence of Anthony Gorman, also an Irishman, a principa sufferer, and otht re, it commenced in the ptildia.house of Mr. Leary, where he (Gorm4n) wai acchlent,,lly met by the three soners yesterday morning, and fallen real of with menacing tst:Lt the effects of a cherished grudge; and between whom and the pr.- sorter Hurley a fight afterwards took place, when Hurley, Lau:ng his nose split and his left eye clnsed, and likely to he beater:, the other two made a savage ru tyrin hbi antagonist, and best rant into a stare of insensibility, covered with blood. _ John Kinsey, the officer, stated, Cost in consequence of inform• thin that a man was killed, he repaired to the spot, armed, :.t -tended by assistants, and found upwards of 300 persons ctilec:e.. of the prisoners' faction. Having, after a tlmper.:te rests: . ..rce. se cured the three men at the bar, and scut them in cLst , ,cly :o t!t- Borough Compter, his attention was turned to the protection of the prosecutor's life, which would, douhtie.s, bat r,r interference, have been sacrificed to the ft.ry of the :Lob, and ear— -1 ducted him to a place of safety, surrounded by the cutlasses aro; pistols of his party. The jacket of the prosecutor, steed in blood, was Traduced. The prisoners Driseol and Purley being- proved atTr, , surF, w re ordered to find voil bail, and discharged, autnoia tion, it appearing he was less implicated. DT El). Feb. 17, in lit. 2.6. S. long. 60. E. A'.exzntle: Law, Eq. Chief Officer of the lion. Corn.,an's t.ip ilythe. May 19, it Aloat of .111n.to, Oat .41 Jteuart, fornwrly Lord Provost of i:Jinburgh, ag. d 7:4. Allay 17, 3C It/Zl(5, Lieur.-Co!nnel T;,onins liinlo7h, of Kiltie. Alay 17, s pc :ngkcli, Charles Doti: h:s Al tx well, aged 0 v fourth on of Lieutenant-Gen.:rai :at: John liars liar.. Saturday, 5 t Chelsea, aged 67, the Rev.. Joseph Dixon, many years Rector of Stdlingtuu, Sussex. (hi the (7onzi:o•ot, the li‘v. 11.,rry Waller, of Iftll Barr., mt.: . r.,acunstield, :tucks, Hector of fat:itington, Gloucest.:-hire. Ships !it :'.l:tr!.cr. 21, Nvwcastle SiindcrlAnd COAL MARKET, JUNE'. Sbips Sold. 2c - - s. Fria.. :Is. 91. to .11-. 6J. to 425. DAY. ARM.. t:t. 1 11"A-rrt"ord Litt ti,,ey 4:1,1 JerNey o . Liit)ol4 1 1 Holland o 0 Mediterranean ARR. st'• France 1 0 Haraburgh 0 Pi nuers 0 0 PrJztls 0 i Cott,vburgh 0 (• America 0 1 1 0 HIGH-WATER at LONDON-.BRIDGE TO.MOR HOW. • I`S at:flutes ate! 7 S 9 minutes after 7 LONDON l'r.wel and puNi.hvd by' LsviL Kul; TL mph-Bar Ha etA do tali atm Um 'pi 1111 C. th. ini tic toi an