Star. — London, England, 1824-03-10 00:00:00

•• , • mining Catholic Bibles into schools with Catholic notes an d comments. • Mr. GR fTAN replied.--lie had made no chargt •st the ..ociety but he 11Cld in his hand a do c ument ( ra n which it appeared that 19,0001. were to be devoted tonhe Society, and he gave notice that unless the sys. ter were changed he would oppose the grant.—The petition was then read, and ordered to be printed. WAYS AND MEANS. • Mr. HUSKISSON moved the Order °title Day, that !Ile Report of the Committee of Ways and Means should be then brought up. . . The Resolutions were then read, and Bills ordered ac c ordingly. The Ott solutions on the Foreign Spirits and Sweets were also read 3 second time. Mr. HUi•IE - wished to know what was the rate of duties imposed by this resolution? whilst the duties on Scotch spirits were only 2s. 6d. and those on foreign 10s. 6d. it was absurd to think that smuggling should not be carried on. Mr. HUSKISSON said the present Resolutions only, applied to the annual duties, which consisted of Gs. Bd. on brandy, and 3s. 6d.on rum. No pat t of it was upoq English spirits. Any reduction on rum would be a re duction on the permanent duties. The Resolution on the Tax on Pensions was read a second time. SILK TRADE. Mr.IIUSKISSON wished that the House would allow the bringing up the resolution in respect of the silk duties, .which he had submitted in a Committee of the whole House on the preceding evening. Mr. BARING said,.that in consequence of the vote of the last night he should not oppose them in this stage. The subject required calm consideration, and his pre sent acquiescence proceeded only from a wish to accom mutate his Right Honourable Friend, but on the im plied condition that he would give the subject the ini inuest and closest attention. Mr. HUSKISSON would most certainly do his utmost to procure a full and speedy examination and discussion of this subject, for the sake of those in the trade, who were interested in having tit, allowance of duty. Mr. 13ROGDEN brought up the Report of the Cus toms Goods Acts. Mt. BARING' thought that with respect to silk dories, those who had small stocks on hand of 4001. or 6001. worth, were • equally entitled to drawbacks and allowances as those who had forty or fifty thousand pounds worth. Mr. HUME considered that this treasure, from all that had transpired with respect to it, bad been very un r.upposed to be an experjment on the part of Ministers. He believed they had come to a very proper and wise decision. , . , . • Mr. ELLICE hoped, when the Chancellor of the Ex. cl.equvr should see that trade, be would stipulate that on their renewing the bounty they should instantly pro ceed to employ those men who n.iaht have been thrown out 01 employment. After a few words from Sir H. PA ttNEtt. and Mr. Alder man NVoon, the Report was read, and Bills or dered accordingly. IRISH' TITHES COMPOSITIOV. . Mr. GOULBUIIN . rose to move for leave to 'bring in a Bill to. amend the Tithe Composition Act in Ireland. lie was encouraged to hope that the *alteration he bad to sie:.. 4 eit would give complete efficiency to that mea sure. He hoped the moniept wobld shortly arrive when by attentively watching the working of this Bill in its amended state, the , Legislature might adopt, at last, .2 genera;ly operative' measure, which would give general satisfa eon, and effect a complete acquiescence through out Ireland in the system of Irish Tithe's Composition. These had been two Sorts of objections made to this Bill; namely, o b jections to the whole of the Bill, and tothose he dio net intend to:make any allusion, strengthened as le had teen by the strong suppoit of that House in their vete of last year; . and objections to its several en actments. He th ought it would not be di ffi cult to prove that neither had any additional burtheqs been laid on the Public, nor had there been any inclination shewn by. the Bill to increase the incomes of the Clergy, .o,r Any carelessness of the interests of the lay impropriators.s He proceeded ro state at length the progress the Bill bad made. Alter its general circulation through all the parishes of Ireland by the Irish Government, there had., been upwards of 1000 applications for special vestries to carry the Bill into effect in so many parishes. Of the results in these parishes 579 were known—namely, that 240 had adopted the Bill, and 339 had adjourned its further consideration to a future period. To prove that the Bill had been considered by others besides the Clergy to have studied their interests, he should only state, that whereas the applications for select veitries by the Clergy had been 507, those by lay persons and land ov, tier s were 526. The Right Honourable Gen tleman went at length into an examination of the rates per acre of Tate Composition agreed on in the diocese of Cashel, the best cuttivated county in Ireland, from which it appeared - the average per acre was only.2s.lid. which in tact was no more than I s. 3d. per English acre. In the di ocese o f C; on f ert i t was 1 Id. or 6d. per 11.nglish acre. These calculations would shew there was untruth in the charge that the rates were calculated to increase unfairly or enormously the incomes of the Clergy. Indeed, many of those who had adjourned these' vestries had since applied to hold fre s h vestries in order to adopt the system. The greatest opposition experienced Was from the proprietors of grating land,who hadbitherto. enjoyed an exemption from tithes, and who beef used all their influence to defeat what they never stroul4 have de. feated by argument. These no doubt 'would be soon cured, through the it.edium Of those who possessed the property iu land whenever the present leases should espire. It was to be recollected, that the pill was brought in at a tune when for t iv° years previOus little or no tithe had been collected. The House, therefore, was obliged to refer to a period when it was peculiarly difficult to as certain the income of the' clergy. There were many parishes in which tithe had not risen with the rise of produce. These were some of the difficulties that met the Commissioners. However, of the 240 parishes in . vi , hich agreements had been entered into with the there was not one in which complaint was Made that the rate hdd been higher than the landowner 'aught in justice to pay, or the Clergyman to receive : — . 1 .11 some instances where tithe had increased, the high average operated against the progress of the Bill. In such cases it followed of course that Vestries were ad !mined. By the provisions of the former rill the in t.'nu: to be a si:;ned was in proportion to the rate of corn oa an average of three years. lle meant to pro pose that. the average shoulii be taken on seven years, :root itgl to 1821. Another object he had in view to give no more than one vote to each of the Yes by the former regulations the number of votes cir member of the Vestry had was in proportion to amount of tithe paid. , It . was obvious that all 1 .." lesion classes were thus excluded from giving effect • to their vote, and that they teho -paidlost tithe must Irate an unfair preponderance. By the first Act' he composition was to take effect from the sth November .following the agreement. From the time at.which the Act passed it was impossible this could take effect, riot. ,could it from the Ist of November next, considering the time at which it was likely the measure now proposed would be carried through the House. He meant there fore to propose, that every composition entered into before the Ist of May should commence its operation from the Ist of May. The only other change he meant to propose was relative to the mode of collecting the tithe in each parish. Mr. GRATTAN said, it was now proposed to amend an Act of the operation of which the House knew - nothing, as no documents ha.cl• been laid before. the House. He would venture to say, that out of the 250 parishes eitrded to by the Right Hon. Gentleman, the' Bill was not in operation in a single one. He took some trouble to bring the measure into operation, and presided - at two Vestry Meetings; but there was hardly one present who seemed to comprehend the nature of the Bill. Were it not for a circular sept round by the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Goulburn) it would have been impossible to act upon the measure at all. In one of-the instances alluded to, the Rector himself moved all the Resolutions, and they were all negatived. Mother, the Rector agreed to accept 4001. but made a difficulty as to the modeof taking the averages on three years. To remedy this difficulty, he said he woufd.give a bond for Mil. agreeing at the same time to receive-no more than 4001. He thought it highly objectionable to take the average on seven years. It would be more easy to judge of the probable average price of corn for three years. - He also objected to the proposal of giving every man only one vote, for in that way-the lon 7 er class would prevail, and not they who occupied most 14nd. Air. HUME said the Bill nosy p ro p ose d wou ld rat h e r , increase the confusion. Nothing could remove existing difficulties but the breaking up of the whole Church establishment of Ireland. It was most unjust to call upon thirteen out of fourteen of the population to sup poi tan establishment to which they did not belong. = This great cause:of irritation should be zemoved by enabling land owners to buy up the tithe at once. It would be better to delay this measure till the papers moved for had been produced, They could not other wise know the effect of the Bill passed last Session. He should for these reasons oppose the motion for bring. ing in the Bill. • Mr. Secretary PEEL said he saw no reason for op ! posing the motion. It was not intended that the Bill should be brought into Committee until the necessary information was before the House.. It would, therefore, -be fighting against a.shadow tc answer the observations of the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Hume). if ever he heard a speech in favour of a motion for amending a Bill it was that of the Member for Wicklow (Mr. Grattan), for the [lon. Member professed that he could not un derstand the. Bill as it now stood. He should, therefore, rather have seconded the motion. There were, how ' ever, two things to be considered , at a meeting; the thing to be explained, and the Chairman who under took to explain it. . • Mr. GRATTAN said, he looked attentiTely at: the Bill. He did 'not mean to say that it was altogether unintelligible to him, but he could not make it under stood by the 23 Vestrymen who attended. • -Mr. Secretary PEEL proceeded. He thotight it must be more objectionable to take the averages on three than on seven years. It might be left optional with the parties to make their agreement for 21 years if they pleased. They were not now in a situation to judge of the details. It would be better to postpone all discus sion to a future period. After a few words from Mr. GRATTAN and Mr. .111rste, leave.was given to bring in the Bill. BEQUESTS TO ROMAN CATHOLICS FOR PIOUS PURPOSES. Sir H. PARNELL said, he presented a petition last , Session from the four Roman Catholic Archbishops of Ireland, praying that Ropsan • Catholics might be en abled..ti hold and purchase lands for charitable and pious purposes. It was then his intention to introduce a Bill on the subject, but the Session was too far ad vanced. In consequence of a communication with his, Rig hr Han: Friend (did Attorney-General for Ireland); he nbw found that the petitioners acted under a misap- . prehension of the state of the law as it related to Ca-• tholic charities. In the course of the two last years a Roman Catholic Lady had made several bequests for pious purposes. The Commissioners of Charitable Be- , quests filed a Bill in Chancery to defeat the object, and to have the property thus left applied ti' other purposes.. The question was argued before the Chancellor of Ire- . land, and he decided that the bequests were legal in every respect. The Attorney-General for Ireland (Mr. Plunkett) was not concerned in-the cause, but he assured him (Sir H. Parnell) that the law gave the same privi leges in this respect to the Catholics of Treland,"as were enjoyed by the Protestant Dissenters. 'Under this assu l rause, he felt it unnecessary to press the subject further. SUPPLY. Mr. BROGDEN brought up the Report of Supply; Thezesolution being put relative to the civil estabT lishment•of the Ordnance, • • Mr. H ME asked whether Commissariat Clerks were to be considered on the same footing as those of the Ordnance, after being transferred from the old to the new e stablishment? • si r E. HARDltsidg said they would retain all the • • • . • advantages that belonged to them in their former situa tion. The change woulc[nqt operate to their disadvantage. - Mr.CALCRATT said thetlerkaithe Ordnance was not adequately paid in proportion to the salary of under. secretaries and other public officers. His time was fully occupied, and he must be a Member of Parliament. The salary, however, was no more than 1,0001. a year. When he (Mr. Calciaft) filled the office the salary was double, and he di'd nos think himself overpaid. - • d Mr. Secretary PEEL said he was not prepared . to give 's an opinion on the.subject ; but enough had been said by thenOnordable Gentleman to satisfy Government' thatirwas %iell.l.vpitlty-of consideration. • , Mr. HUME•said; tbatif any addition should be made," he hoped it would be taken from the salaries of those, who had not so much to do.—Resolution agreed to. The Resolution being put relative to the Military 'Academy at Woolwich. Sir H. HARDINGE, in answer to an _observation from Mr. Mime, said that a reducsion of 1,5001.. had been Made in Masters and Professors since last year. There were no more than sixty.-three Cadets under a course of,iilstruCtion, iiumber was less the Aca demy could not go on at all. After few words from Mr. D. Gaunt and Sir H. HA Am.yoz,sthe Resolution was agreed On rite Resolution for a vote Of 114,4311. for the itrrice of the Ordnance in the Barrack Department in Great Britain— • : Mr. HOBHOUSE objected to it. It was true that • , the Patriots of - former days wished to have barracks;' but then we had no standing artily, and the soldiery were paid out Of the King's pocket. , It war a perfectly novel and unconstitutional mode of lodging the soldiers of this day. It WAS perfectly possible for every free country to make too great a distinction between a soi l:het and a citizen. He would not deny that a soldier trained in barracks • might turn out a finer animal for parade ; he might becoMe a more perfect' machine—a more finished hutomaton ; he would alto admit that it was desirable to have the soldier as complete as pos sible in his military exercises; but it could not on the other hand be denied, that in former times, before a single barrack existed in..thetrhintry, we had turned out soldiers capable of upholding the honour of tie, country in the field against the best trained and best da-ciplined ar miss of the Continent, and that the soldiers of those times had achieved victories that would bear a compa rison with any of those which had been gained in later days. The Honourable Member concluded by moving as an Amendment, a Resolution— " That it appeared to the risme that since the condtHion of the ,war in 1815, more than two millions had been expended in the maintenance of barracks in the United Kingdom; in addition to which a vote was proposed of £114,531 for the same purpose for the present year, which it appeared was to be applied in part to the erection of a permanent herceck, in the King's Mews, for one of the Regiments of Foot Guards; that the [louse could not but view with great suspicion the establishment of a system so utterly at va riance with the recorded opinions of eminent and enlightened men of former times, and among others of Jr. Justice Blackstone, who declared the condition of a permanent standing soldier, and the erection of barracks, camps, and inland fortresses, for the separation of the soldiery-from the citizens, to be repugnant to the principles of the Constitution of the country; and therefore that the House could not vote a larger sum than £90,000 for the barrack department, and-was of o-si, niou that no permanent barracks ought to be erected within the MetThpolis." Sir 11. 11A111)1NGE said, it must be in the recollec tion of many Members, that at an early period of the late war the table of the House was covered with Peti tions praying for relief from the hardship of having troops quartered or billeted upon the people, and for the increase of barracks for the lo,dging of the troops. When the preparations of the enemy called for cone. sponding efforts on our part,which rendered it necessary to collect large bodies of troops on various points of our coast, it was found impossible.to keep them under cover throughout the winter, and equally so to lodge them in the public-hou.es on the coast—it was impos sible, therefore, during the war; to have avoided the erection of barracks. Since the peAce, he had already stated ) that a very large portion of the barracks so erected had been put down ; those which remained were, for the most patt, situated in places where large bodies of troops must necessarily be collected for the conve nience of disposing of them as circumstances might re 'quire, and were not more than adequate to the accom modation of ti'e disposable force of the country—the whole of the barracks in the Kingdom not exceeding the accommodation- required for 30,000 men. With respect to the permanent barracks in the King's-mews, for one of the Regiments of Guards, he did not know that their erection had yet been determined on, and wail at a loss, therefore, to imagine how it could appear to the Honourable Member or the }louse that a part of the present vote was to he so applied. Before the Re volutionary war of 1792, when, with the exception ofl the Tower, there were no barracks for the use of the Guards e but the whole, of the three regiments were dis persed in quarters about the town ; the consequence - of such a modsi of quarteringxhetn was, that the Guards were in ~the most deplorable state as to discipline, and in 1790, at least one of every' fourteen men. con victed at the Old Bailey belonged to the Guards (Hear, hear)—whereas at present. it. was the fact, that out of the whole three Regiments, not one man had been convicted there for a considerable time .past—so great was the improvement effected by the more effi cient controul which the barrack system gave to the Officers over the men. Mr. HUME said, the only object of keeping up such establishments, and of maintaining rf.o large a standing army as we had at. present, was to convert the Govern ment of this country into a military despotism—(Hear, hear)..-41e said it was so—(Laughter)—for the idea of keeping 73,000 men under arms in a civil government, in a time of profound peace, with any other view, was-a great absurdity. Mr. HOBHOUSE said, he learned the fact of the refection of permanent barracks in the King's Mews having been determined on ' .by . putting the question to tl)e Secretary at War from his place, when he received an answer across the House in the affirmative. Sir U. BURGH said, that since the transfer of the Barrack Department to -the Board of Ordnance 4'1822, the greatest exertions had been used to lessen the esta blishment, and to reduce the expenditure; and a consi derable number of barracks had been put down, both in Great Britain and in Ireland. The Amendment was Orn put and negatived without a -division, and the original resolution was agreed to. The Recovery of Penalties Bill went through a Committee, and was ordered to be reported this day se'nnight. ILL-TREATMENT OS 4 CATTLE RILL. Mr. R. MARTIN moved that the House do resolve itself into a Committee on this Bill. Mr. HUM E saw no reason why the Honourable'Mem ber for Galway should be the exclusive protector of cattle. He (Mr. Hume) had hitherto taken , no part against the Honourable Menthes measures except that of voting against them —(A now, however, felt it necessary to say a few words on The subject. By the Bill which the Honourable Member had introduced this Session, it was made an offence to overload a horse. How was it possible roascertain what load was suited to a horse's strength ? He had seen a little pony that could carry his Noble Friend near him (Lord Nugent) with the greatest ease—(A laugh).—lt would not surprise him, however, to find many a large horse that. would Add it difficult to do the same thjng—(Larighter).— He was willing to admit that the Honourable Member 'for Galway would have done good if he had allowed his Bill of last Session to remain unaltered. lie would itatewhy he doubted the humanity of the Honourable 'Member. On a former evening he (Mr. Hanle) made a Motion,to prevent the torturing of imen—he meant by flogging. He expected, as a matter of course, that the Honourable Member for Galway would give him his vote; but, to his great surprise, he found that that Gen tlemani.who was so anxious to protect oxen, and who sympathised so much with the sufferings of dogs and cats, did, without the slightest remorse, consign, as far as his vote went, 73,000 Englishmen to the torture of the lash—(Heat). The Honourable MeUrber concluded by moving that the House should resolve itself into a Corn mitteepn the Bill on that day 'six months. • The ATTORNEY-GENERAL rose to second the ; Amendment proposed by the Honourable Member for Aberdeen. The present Bill appeared to him to be vex atious' and every- way unnecessary. The definition of the offence in the Bill which 'the Hon. MeMber kir Galway ,had introduced last• year, was the wilful ill treatment uf horses and cattle. He nndarstood, howevet, tbat the object of the present Bill was to render the ill-treatment Of those animals, arising from inadvertence lad negli gence, a misdemeanour. There was one clawe of tl:e Bill which, in charity to the framer of the Bid himself, he hoped would be withdrawn. He alluded to that clause which authorized any individual to apprehend a person in the act of ill-treating cattle. He knew, from the teal which the- Hum. Member had heretofore dis played in the cause of humanity, that not a week would 'elapse befot , e he would he forced into some desper.ite 'conflict in attempting to en'orce the law—(A laugh.) He remembered that the Hon . . Member had been extremely anxious to inttoduce the word " bull' into the Bill of last year. After a long discUssion, however, the bull was ejected by a large majority—(Laughter.) The Hon. Membgr, however, coati ived to itrroduce the words "or other cattle," and he had been endeavouring, during the last year, to pershade the Magistrates that the bull was included in that de-,ctiption. lie sup posed it Was for the same object that the lion. Member had introduced the words "or other castle" into the present Bill. He- (the Attorney-General) objected to having the bull introduced thus covertly. The lion. Member should take the bull by the horns, and bring it in openly—(Lareghter.) Mr. W. SMirli was convinced that the7Bill of his Honourable Friend, ridiculed as it had been,had already conferred great benefit upon the torn wonky. He conceived the object of the present Bill to be goncl,a aid was therefore disposed to go into a Committee upon it. !Ur. It. Al A lIT I N replied to the arguments of the speakers in opposition to his Bill. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL supported the amendment. ' 1)r. LUS II IN GTo N had not beard any sufficient argument urged to prevent the Bill from going into the Committee; and there receiving such amendments as might seem expedient. Mr. C. W YNN opposed the Measure for the same masons ' which had led him to oppose flue existing Act of the Honourable ' Member for Galway. Mt. BUXTON supported the motion. Tie had asked a friend what tlYvct the Bill of last year had produced, and the answer was, that it had put amend to half the cruelty which formerly prevailed In the country. Mr. W A RIM said it bad been Stated by a Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. \Vynn) that the cases which measures of this kind brought before Magistrates were in general of so doubtful a cha racter, so nicely balanced; that it was a, chance whether conviction would or would not take place. lie denied this to be the fact. An overwhelming majority of the cases recently prosecuted were of so atrocious a character, that conviction had regularly followed accusation. He should support the motion for the Bill going into a Committee. Alderman BRIDGES also supported the motion. He shortly pointed out the evil effects which an habitual practice of tormenting animals, or seeing them tormented, must produce on the mind, and illustrated his proposition by an allusion to liogarth, whose Hero, in The . Progress of Cruellq, commences with tying a canister to a dog's tail, and ends by committing murder. Mr. GOU I.BU RN opposed the motion. The Bill of last Session had, it appeared, effected much good : but because it did not effect all that the 'Honourable Member contemplated, he now came for ward, and called um the House to tolerate a most disproportioned punishment, by making the offence a misdemeanour, at the discre tion of the Magistrate. . Mr. G. BAN LIES expressed himself in favour of the Bill. - Mr. HUSICISSON spoke against the Motion. The House Was now required to increase the punishment for this offence, although the Honourable Member for Galway had shewn that this was not necessary. The Honourable Member himself had stated to the House, that, generally, when he obtained a conviction, he paid the penalty himself, the persons accused being mostly too poor to pay it. This surely proved that the present Bill was sufficiently severe. Mr. COURTENA Y said, the statement that a penalty of 51. would not prevent bull-baiting, because persons addicted to that practice could easily raise so small a.sunt, was quite fallacious. The penalty of N. applied to every person actively engaged in bull-baiting. The call of" Question" now became general, and the gallery was cleared for a division. While strangers were excluded, the House was counted, and there not being forty 'Members present, an adjourns meat took place at a Quarter before Twelve o'Clock. • MILIAN FINANCES. The rettlinelet, a Buenos Ayres Paper, gives the fdllowing as the state of the Chili Treasury : SUPPLIES. The annual interest of the Loan The Siutnial expenses of Santiago Those of Conception - These of Valdivia Dollars. 400,000 I ,026,948 560,000 180,000 • -1,906,948 • Total WAYS AND MEANS. The produce of the Customs - 1,100,000 All other Revenue - . uOO,OOO Leaving a deficit of - - 666,9.411 Total ---•-,---1,016,948 It is said that Chili expects a great amelioration of her finances from Senor Benavente, the new Finance Minister, whose know ledge and capacity are generally acknowledged. VAGRAATS. • The following is an Account of the Number of Persons, both Male and Female, committed to the House of Correction in Cold- Bath-fields, during the two last Years, specifying the different 'Heads of Offence. 1822. I 1823. Men! IWo., To . m e r Wo-' To- - imen.l tal. " a men ital. Rogues and Vagabonds, including , teggars, Prostitutes, &c. 766 Reputed thieves - - - 298 Deserting their Families - - 7,1 Gamblers and Impostors - 34 Indecent Exposure - - 11 121 887 689 122! 811 2 300 5L2 2! 514 1 72 724/ -3' 75 3 37 32 t 3! 4:1 14 25 59 71 66 1 - 13'21 I 11508 A general statement of the Revenue and Expenditure of the City ref Edinburgh, frr.in the 30th of September, 1822, to the.29th of September, 1823, has been pub lished. The expense of the City fur his MAJESTY'S visit amounts to £4202. 14s. 10d. THE HERMIT IN TUE COUNTRY.—A New Edition of this amusing Work, by the well known autlinr of the " Hermit in London," has lately appeared, in which all the Papers on Scottish Manners are collected together in the Third Volume. Among the most remarkable, arc—Society in Edinburgh—Sunday Evenir.g Amusements—Lady Griselda Mac Tab's Ball—Scottish Discretion %---3 - logmanay; or, New. Year's Morn in Edinburgh—Tv/al o'Clock —The. Scots Eire-side—The Foy—The Dragey—Auld Lang-Syne —Highland Ilotpitality—Highland Sporting—Gregor Mac Gre gor's Welcome—The Highland. Outlaw—A liighland Regiment's 1. Return—Northern Votaries of Bacchus, &c. _ _ _ It has not escaped observation, that ,when the Mi nister brought forward his Budget, no allusion was made to the Lofricay, sic that Government firmly adlicre to the determina tion expressed last Session, that they should not apply to Parlia ment for another Bill: the knowledge of this fact proves propitious to Mr. SIVEWAIGHT, who took this last Con trast, though the Fore £io,ooo Prizes in the Wheel, Two for ICIIiXT IVVINESDAV, 17th March, would at all times prwve attractive; but the influence id the above is indescribableit has caused such' a scramble far Whole -Tickets that there is not one ktt, it causes now such a t! , •- mand for Haloes that they must soon he all gone, then there w.l: be a scramble for the Quarters and smaller Shares, for all who ar• aware how short a time the Lottery has to live, unapintously re solve to be "in at the Death." IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO FAMILIFS FURNISI:- 'No —By applying at the real Manufacturer's they will find a Savi•.; of nearly One-Half. Every article of Furniture manufactured ur the Premises, and Warranted of the best Quality. Sixty different patterns of Chairs; from Twenty to Sixty Dorth of well - searo ad Mahogany, real R o sewood, stained Rostwood, Cottage and Bee room Chairs of all colours, ready for inspection, and real ILse wood iicarlv as cheap as stained. Card, Sofa, Lon Tables, and Ca binets to match. A large assortment of well-seasoned Mahogarry Sliding Dining Tables of all sizes, Sideboards, Wardrobes, Drawers, and all other articles of Furniture, too numerous to men tion, at It. Witssuct.roses Manufactory, '214, High Holborn, ap posite Southamptoa-street, Bloonisbury-sluare. I I - 'l'