Star. — London, England, 1805-07-04 00:00:00

EL EPFN7 RAP:AT. ][TORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE UPON THR ELE• VENTL at PORT CF THE COMMISSION OF N•F•L EN• Iky lit v.—( Concluder! from yylerday'i ,Sr4R.) Ftteller Fzaminalion ff Ewaw Law, Efq. If Mr. Goldfield bad Rated to you., that the nicotine in golf tints, vial in hix opinion indifpenfably neeelTarl , or materially ufe ful fee the (ippon of public credit, and had offered to your corfi deratioo fuels and reafonings in fepport 421 fuch an opinion, fhould you have thought it proper or not to have entered into that en quiry ?—Had it occurred to me to take into confideration what thould have done. had fuch reprefent:tione been wade by Mr. Goldfmid, I Mould have. probably, been tow able to anfwer the queftion, but that not having been the ca!e, it is morally impolli hie for me to do fo, as I curvet fay what I thould k..ve done at t'ie time under fuch circumitane s; 1 have, however, no hefita- Von to Rate tbat which !now think upon the fubjea, namely, that what Mr. Gorfned roir,ht have raid or 'be occcfrity or expedien cy of the mearucr. woub! nit have induced nit to prepore the en tering into the enquiry; I beg leave to add, that as I before Rated, Clot I .!id not ricolleet any Inch communication as that allioied to • avir g teen made by Mi. Gobillnid; 1 urn now conEttimd it my opinion that he has been n.i.taken in Rating that Ira had made fuch a commuilleati4vr. You having Rated that Mr. Goldfmld went into very long di grcffione, are yon confident in jour belief and recolledien, that no part of thole dire Mons related to the meal - Iry or expediency of the meartire ?—1 do not recoiled, nor do I bet eve that they did . You having Rated you heli.vt 41 that not tare hurtiredth port of what Mr. Gollfto id R. te d before the Commiffioners of Naval En quit) , is tee rdcd in their Report, do you mean that no part of the remaining ninety nine parts had reference t• the occer.ity or expediency of the mcafure ?-1 do mean that 1 believe fo. Were the queßions put to Mr. Goldfroid on the 25th of June, and recorded in the Report. prepared beforehand, er were thi framed not or the matter that arofe In the comic 4,1 hls examina tion ?—1 firmly believe that they were prepared before hand. Did you conceive, then, that noshing was material to your en quiry. fo far as Mr.Goldfmid was concerned, except the matters to which thole queftions In previoufly prepared were 'Heeded ? Ido conceive that to have been th, cure; had any wher queftions occurred to me at the time, I &mild have propufed them to have b:11: taT:CV down. On what foundation or evidence did the Naval Conuniflioners Rate. that they cot Id not admit the mcafore to have been indif penfably neteiTary fee the fepport of public credit (ea.- t ith Re port, p. 4ll(.)?—They proceeded on the idea, that the irregular method adopted for the railing money could net be indifpenfably tweeflaty,when Parliament could have effeaed the fupply by other means. 1 mid own it did not appear to me neettfary to call evidence to that point. Was it not the intention or the Commiftioners of Naval En quiry, to Rate any circumftauces that 'might tend to jultify or extenuate the Adt which they thou3ht illegal?--The Cemmiflion so< direded their enquiry principally to what regarded the eunduel , of the Naval Department placed under their infpcition, in the Mlle of the bills in queftion. The Rate of the hxchequer, and ether !ratters politically relating to the ['Aka, belong to the De partreent of the Treafury ; they therefore did not carry the en- R eny fo far as to enable then, to ftate what cireumftanzes might Le hr night in juilifleation or exteruation of the mcafure. Did the Comut:flioners think themfelves at libetty to enquire ',t o any thing that the Trerrury might have to aUedge in their juftification ?—They did not. Were there upon Mr. Goldfmld's examination, before any written queftions were put down, feveral converfations by him with the Commiffioners, to make them unit:lit-cod the ufc of the nuefure, concluded by way of queftion and anfwer, as here— Certainly not. If there had been any fuel converfatiow fo eondudled, do you think you mutt have recullethod it ?—i think 1 muft. Had Mr. Goldfini4l any reafon given to him by the Domenic- Cotters to copert that any other evidence or examination would be Inferted by them in this Report, except fetch as he figned in their prefenee N-4l believe there was tint, and I think it impofible It fhould be fo. - - Farther Examination of EtaAar LAW, Ffq. When you (peak of queftions having been previonfly prepared, ' do you mean; prepared before Mr. Goldfmid came before you ? se--Yes, I do. You have hated a firm belief, that all the queftions put to Mr. Goldfmid on the 25th of June, as they appear in the Appendix to the Eleventh Report, were fo prepared beforehand; do you cone tinge in that belief ?—1 fee no rrafon to think otherwife. Is it not pollible that other queftions may have teen put, and anfwers received to them, which do not appear in Mr. GoldfmitPs examination fu the Eleventh Report ?•—1 cannot fpeak to preflibi- ' aisles ; but no queftion not put in writing is conf.dered as fueh by the Commilhoners. Explain what you matt by the word "fuck" in your lath an • fwer mean that no queftions not taken down, and the anfwers thereto ertered in the examination!, are cot littered as forming a part of the e %lettuce epon which the Reports are grounded; I meant to cede& 'shames tnay pals in the way of explanation or eonverfatien. When Mr. Coltifmid was before the Commiffioners of Naval Enquiry on the 25th of Jure, was there any examination of hint by the Conerniffinners, whether verbally or in writin3, concluded : by way of queftion and an(wcr, as here. except what appears in ' the Appendix to the Eleventh Report P—There was not. Did the Commiffioners make any enquiry into the circa:often ees of the times when the iffue of the Navy &Hs took place, in order to akertain whether any application to Parliament was then predicable?—They made leo cequiry 'iuto the cireusaftances of the times. he Examination of litivor NICHOLS, FA. jone 7. It appearirg that you were prefent at the examination of Mr. Goldfmid before the Conlminioners of Naval Enquiry, on the 25th I of June 1204, were the quell ietee which were propofed to him, and which appear in No. ix, in the Appendix to the Eleventh Report, prepared and written before Mr.Goldfmid came to the Board I firmly believe they were, and, to the hell of my knowledge and Belief, they were written by :midi'. Were the anfwers which he gyve to thofe queftions taken down in writing, and afterwards read over to Lim?—They were, but it was with confiderable difficulty the Board could obtain dired an fwers front Mr. Goldfatid. Had be fun opportunity to corral any er - or in the anfwers fo tel. eo down, and stasis eapbined to him that he might do fo if he pleura ?.....Me.ft affimelly he had ; the general prediee of the Board is, after the cold: nee has been taken down. to tell the perfon ex amined that the queftions and anfwers are about to be read over, to give him an opportunity of altering or amending any anfwers which he may have given to the queftions put to him • and I do not believe there has been any Inn:emelt which the Bo ard has de parted from fuch predict', or any infielce in which they have re fa, d to take down sty evidence offered by the party examined, however irrelevant it may have hem to the fulled of the enquiry. After the n.qh cv: y of the evidence has beet forced to the party, s fair crpy of the e: ice nee is miser. and pee vious to its I dog read to the perfon examieed,it has brat the general pradice of the Beard end in no inflame has it, to my isuosel , dee, been departed from, to tell the perfon examined thee lee is at liberty to amend, alter, or t w a in his evidence byway of ateendmeut lam Wished this was done with refpodt to Mr. Goldfoliel's evidence. Did the Commiffieners of Naval Foquiry dire& the fair copy to be made different In any refpedi from the rough copy, exccpt in fuck perticulare as Mr. Goldinsid defired or approved of, or was ft in fad. fu made?—They did not; I rail Coo to winters, and declare in the mai foknue manner in which man Is capable of 'peaking, that the Comte Menem of Naval Freptiry have not, to any knowledge, within ld or kept back any part of the evidence • given before them, or any document, paper,or v.ritin3, that would have tended to the crimi.lation or exculpation of any individual, wile& condudl they were auths•rifed to en ,, uii e into; and that they have not negletiled, m far as I ant capable of judging, to purfue any mturfc of examination , or means of obtaining knowledge, tkat wank'. have tended to crimine te or eacti:pwe tech it:dividends. Did you, in point of fad, on a fulled. of itch ferious crimina tins of Gum invent as that contained In page 46 of your Eleventh Report, where you fay, " it was certainly proper that the public credit ihotdd be fupported, but we cannot admit that this coca• . fore wag indifrenhasly neceffory for that purpae,", enter into any courfe of examination touching that necefilty I—The mtafure al luded to was thoiffue of 4.30e,0"01. of fidtitious Navy bills, for the pu-pofe 0 raifieg money; the mortar did not appearto the COMa steamers of Navel Prqui-y to t o indifpenfably tweeffary, tut Par. 'l am ent was fitting during the time se hen-molt or thefe Bills were fo ailed; and I did not, as or.e of the CurnmifFoners of NavakEn a uky, feel 'thee that L'nard v. ae :onepetet t to go into a coterie of s'ausnimtion touching that samellity, moths' fewit, go into Oct clasnisatior Did the Board toter into any emir, sato the fltdelg of Pella. meet, as conneeled w ith the refpeetive commencements and con tinuance of the iffue of the hills above referred tot—The Board I did not enter into any retch enquiry; it will be fern, on roferetice to the dates of the revere' bills, that the greater part of them were demi dining the time that Parliament is ufually Arc you not aware that it appears from the Account. No. 4, in the Appendix, that thefe hills crated to t e Med for a time on the 7th 01 March, tBot, and commei red again on the yth of Septem ber of that year?—lt appears fo on reference to the Report, and it alfo appears they were continued to tee iffucd mail May slot, without any material lapfe (Odom Were the anfwers which appear in the printed examination of Mr. Goldin:Ll, given by him to each queftion diftindly upon its being read to him, or were they the (angrier of tie converfations with theCommiffioners, put in writing by the Clerk after the C, OS. nlifrioners had confulted anionglt themfelves and determined how ring% it was requifite to have written down ? the Comntiffioners never coafulted how much of Mr. Goldfnud'e evidence it was ne• ceffary to take down; there was confect:Table difficelty in obtain irg dired ar 'veers ft one Mr. Gent:di ; as far ai I am caplet o f recolledieg, the. auto ers to each queltior were didtated by Mr. Goland ; and moth enmity they were loch at Mr. Goldfmid approved of. se I believe Mr. G +timid did al oa (note of Lis an. (were upon .;ie evideoto being read over to him. When Mr. Goldfmid appeared before the CommiMoners on the Istii of June, 1804, was there any exemitiatiot. of Mr. Goldfmid by die CummiMoners, either verbally or in writing, condudled by way ne queltieei and antwer. as here, except what .appears in the Appendix, sto the Teeth and Eleventh Reports?-1 ant fatiefied there was not; the whole of the fuliftance of the evidence given by Mr. Goldfmid was taken down, andappears in the Appendix to thole Reports. hut there was a great deal of ir deviant mom.- ration between Mr. Goldrmiel and fume of the Members of the Board, whiell was not taken down. Did Mr. Gehlftrid, when he was before the Commiffloners on the 25th of June, 1804, or 9th July. Rate any thin; to them on the fulled of the neeeffity or utility of the iffue of the Lille in queftioo, and if he did, at what time and in what manner f—l do not believe that Mr. Goldfmid did have any thing to the Board on either of thole days as to the neeellity or utility of the mem fore ; and if he Mid Rated any thing as to the utility of the mea fure, I am fati,led it would have been Rrongly impreffed upon my mind. Did you examine any evidence touching the neceffity or utili ty of the meafure ?—None ; but Come queftions which may ap. pear to have relation thereto, which were put to the Comp troller of the Navy, and appear in . the Appendix to the Eleventh Report. Did you examine M. GoldfirM 12 to the neeeffity dr utility of the meafure f elTuredly rot. Did you conceive Mr. Goldfmid to be a perfon competent to (peak of the comparative advantage or difadvantage of different modes of railing money 1-1 never confidered whether Mr. Gold fmid was or was not competent; if I bad formed a judgment from his manner, I Mould not have thought him competent. Lid you confider the Comptroller of the Navy as the more coin petent perfon whom you could call beton you, to enable you to form a Judgment as to the comparative advantage or difadvantage of different modes of railing money? No. Did Mr. Goldfmid,while before the Board on the 25th of June 1804, give the Commiffioners of Naval Enquiry any information refpeding the nett of the money market, at or during the cond nuance of the lithe of the bills in quelthni ? I firmly believe be did not. Are you pofitive he did not ? I have a tolerable good memory, and I Blond (wear, if called upon, to the belt of nay knowledge and belief, that he did not. Did Mr. Goldfmid float any fads or opinions to thew, that the iffue of the bills in queflion was a more advantageous mode of railing money, under the then exiling circumftances, than by an iffue of Exchequer delis ? 1 firmly believe he did not. In pcint of red, was any part cf Mr. Goldfmid's evidence taken down, which did not appear to the Commiffioners of Nava) Em ctoiry to be diredl anfwers to the queltions previouflf prepared and put to him ? It ie impoffible tor ate on recolledliun Cu fay„but I think it probable that Mr. Goland might have given anfwers which were nut conflicted theca anfwers, and which Mr. Gold. (mid might have altered or amended previous to the fair copy of his evidence being mode. Do you mean to fay, that no part of Mr. Goldfiniere anfwers was omitted to be taken down, or was altered or amended, except at his e x [-refs &Arc ?—I more atfuredly mean to fay, that Mr. Golifinid's anfwers were not altered or amended except at his expreli define, nor do 1 scow that any part of his anfwers were omitted to be taken down. Are his anfwers, as reported in the Appendix in the Eleventh Report, in the very words tiled and dielated by him 1-1 t is his poMble for me to fay, but I believe they are as they were originally taken down, or as they were amended by him. Did any aufwers or words of Mr. Goldtinid, that you confidered as irrelevant, relate In any way to the policy, utility, neeeffity, or economy of the :mature of the Wile of Navy Bills ?—Thls is a queftion that bat in faltance been put to me more than once, anol I call GOD to witnefi, that I do not believe Mr. Goldfmid (laced to the Conimiffioners of Naval Enquiry, any thing refpeeting the policy, the utility, the neceffity, or the economy of that meafure. Was all that Mr. Goldimid offered as evidence t. ken cloyed, whether you confldered it relevant °rum, and entered in the Ap pendix ?-1 believe all that was offered by Mr. Gunflint' as evidence in anfwcr to the queltions that were previcutly written and put to him, was taken down; and I believe all that be offered as evidence arrears in the Appendix to the Eleventh Report, except !Itch part of the anfwers a- were :emended at his &flee. Do you (peak from an wet recolleition of what pared in Mr. Goinmid's evidence, (pacifically ou the 25th June and 9th July, or only from your =collation of the general pradtice of the Board —I (peak front the general predict of the Board, and front the belt of my recolledlion with refpeet to Mr. GoldindiEs evidence. What do you mean by the conliderable difficulties which the Board had to obtain direct anfwers front Mr. Goldfmid ?-1 mean to allude to Mr. Gold mold's confuted manner in didtatiog the an fwers to the queftionsput to him, and limit calling upon one Mem ber and then on another to explain his anfwers to them. Did Mr. Goldfmid, at any time during his examination or rub requent to it, exprefs any diffatisfation to the Commiffioners at the mode in which that examination was concluded, or any appre henfion that his evidence was imperially taken down?—Molt affuredly not. Did Mr. Goldfmid, in the eourfe. of his converfatlons with the Commilfioners, Rate any thing tending to prove that his Majefty's Government was either not jultitiable in dining Navy bills, or that they had not adopted the belt mode of railing money for the (up porting of public credit ?—I believe not. If kr. Goldfmid had made futh a fta:ement, Ronald you have eonfidered it as fubjed mutter fur your Report ?—I believe not, as the Commit:fiances of Naval Enquiry did not feel theinfelvee authorifed to go in to fuck enquiry. You having mentioned that all the queftions put to Mr. Gold (mid were written down before Mr. Goldfmid came to the Booed, was that the cafe with regard to all the other witneffes whole evi dence appears in the Appendix to the Eleveath Report ?—lt has been the general pradice of the Board to write down queftions previous to the examination of • individuals, and to put loch fur ther queftions as may be =diary upon the matter that may a* out of the evidence ; but it is inteeilinle for me to fay whether the whole of the queftions put to the other witneffes, whole col deuce appears in toe Appendix to the Eleventh Report, was writ ten down previous to their examination, without reading the whole of the evidence given by then,. and conidering whether the qeettions were or were nut written down previous to their ex etrioatioo. Can you Rate why your reeollation, that every queßion put to Mr. Goldfadd was written down previous to his coming be• fore the tOard, is more paled than as to the examination of the other witneifes ?—Becaule Mr. Coldfmid's examination is con& derably floater than that of other witneffes, mid I hare particu larly directed my attention to the queftions put to Mead oldfain Mice the litr'r g of this Committee. Is it from the preterit view and confederation of the queftions put to Mr. Colt:timid on the 25th of June, that you conclude, in point of fait, the queftions were all written down previous to his coming before you ?—lt is (ruin a belief that I did myfelf write the queftioes down previous to Mr. Gail:niers examination. 7be Examination of the Right Hon. CHARLis LONG. Can you Rate to the Committee, what the eircumftances were 1 that led to the ifrue of Navy Bills to Mr. Glentty at the end of Odober 1304 ?—Upon the examination of the fupplies voted for the fervice of the navy in the courfe of that year, it was found that they would not he fufficicot to defray the capence that would be incurred, and the iffue of theft Navy Bills was fuppored to be the molt advantageous mode of making good the deficiency. • Can you Rate by whom this mode of ifluing the Navy Bills in queflion, for fupply ing the deficiency, was hilt fuogefl ed can not Rate puiitively by whom that mode was tuguelted, but the meafurt was fakes; with tat roll miaow= of ilia Cluinccilor of lb; f.oclo Tavr. NEW MEDICINE ACT. NEWBERY and SONS, No. 45, St. Paul's . Church-yard, Lou: on, Proprietors of Dr. James's Powder, and other valuable Preparations ' inform the Public, that in mo rgue= of the new Stamp Duties, the price of that Medicine will be in future as. cod. per Packet, or 11. ss. 6d. per Dozen; but the Quantity of a Dozen Packe.s in a Bottle (as made up for tie Army and Navy) may be had for 11. 4.. And u Stamps arc prepzred, by order of the Commilßoners, for Marrs New bery's ferrate Ure, in which the Wards, " F. Newbery, No. 45, St. Paul's" are engraved, and as ids prefumcd that this will be a ruff•lent Security againit Counterfeits, his Signature on the La bels will be difeontinued. _ _ ..... The following are the prices of their Medicines, to tte fira twenty of which Mr. Newbery's Stamps are affixed, bat thole who purchafe fix or more at a titne,will he allowed the Stamps gratis. Dr. James's Powder 2 9 Dalby's Carminative 1 9 a Bottle 24 o Dr. Aultin's Clialybeate —An tie Pills 4 6 Pills - - 4 0 large Box 24 0 Freake'sTindt. of Bark 4 0 Dr. Steeres Opodeldoe 2 6 Ditto 1 - lushant's ditto 3 0 ....•COrlVUlfiUti Oil a 6 Tonic Bills . 2 9 —..-- Nitre Drops 2 6 Fnglifh Coffee - ' 2 9 ----Camomile Drops a 9 Dr. Hoona's Pills a a .....--.- I'arcgoris Lo- Grant's Drops a a zenges I t I Inglifh's Scots Pills a o Angibaud's Blots ditto Ili Hem; 's Magotha 2 6 El:fence of Colesfoot 3 6 Norton's Drops s 6 Mr. Spence's Dentifrice 4 o Spillbury's Drops 5 6 Cephalic Snuff s:i 9 Dr. Solander's 'rea 2 9 Jones's Rheum. Tindt. 3 6 Greenough's Tint:lures a at Berry's Bilious Pills 4 6 Ditto Tole Lozenges xat litence of Peppermint aat Lffence of Ginger 2 9 Giafs's Magnefia 3 6 N.B. As many Perron!, particularly T rengers, miftake the houfe of Alarm Newbery, they think it neeeffary to point out, that it is at the Salt end of St. Paul's, four (lours from Cheadle, with there Words itifcribed on the front— . _ - " Tin ONLY WARILHOVIC FOR Da. 'Angel PON,DIII." HAVING dedicated tayicir to the (lady, azd gratified by the mAt confi,lerable praetice in that branch which I thought proper to felea, I truft that I have cot more it if ern2loyed my time then thoic. who, In the extenfive 9z7.: of It:le twee/Am. are mar:finally immerfed in uncertainty, an 4 cannot. always attain that fuccds which is acquired ky coneentreting the intellettual Fwer to one dale of droracra. The dileafes of DEBILITY arc peculiarly diftrAng for they bring with them a •run of concomitant fyraptorns, by a de prellion of all vital energy, esiltence Welt becomes emNitterol—• Whether they wife from the provalet-e of ill example, thedeftruce tive habits of fehool-boys, or the iniuhtences of tratue ty. they re. quire the moft al:Linens proccelonal ; tt•y the I, , toranee or uneducated sten, the iyinptoms are aggravated, an/ tha con lt ' tution is deftroyed, Asa hIRPAIIIM of the ROYAt. COLLSOBei SURGEONS I ground my pretenfioos on regularity of education; and poff.-ifing every privilege to praetice. I fed myfelf wetted to that confidence with which I have, hitherto been fo honoured. in the finft re/trattoria of local wealtnefs, early applimtion will prevent the calamity of a debilitated frame; but where the fuf ferer, from a conrdoufners of the unman/Ines of the v i ce whict Goofed his misfortune, is fearful of the contempt or cenfure of his family pbyfician and broods over hie infirmity with careful cot ceattnent. it omit be fatisfadtory for him to he allured not only uf capability of treatment, but alfo of the moft inviolable fecrecy. And In recent Venereal Complaints it is poflible to prevent pale, danger or diftrma ; In the molt complicated cafes it is the acquire ment of excledive experience in this hue to ctedi a fare, certain sand Incedy re-eftabliihment. offer the advantage of this experience to tholi of either fez who are affliEted with any kind of DEBILITY. of any fymptoens of VENEREAL INFECTION, and in all cafes the terms of remu neradon are Rated on the firft interview. Pat•enain the country are expel-led to Indore a Pink cote, ane are requdted to fpedfy their age a ,, 3 manner o! Jiving. MARTIN 111111 E, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons In London No 89, Arad/oar:et, WoriJ r neat craple Da. SCARCE AND VOLDAIILE - A,NTiQU'i. COINS. To be 1)IS1'O ED OF' a FIVf.-GUINEit PIECE of GOLD COIN, William and Mary. ann • 1 . 0 , hcllcved to he nearly calque ; a' GUINEA, HALF €R and SHILLING, of the fame reign; a GUINEA, ch w i„ )1 anno 1677, very fc..rce ; an antique COLO COIN, Fze tang than half a guinea, 'tvi:h charaElers fuppof,d Peak ; a G 4 )1 I ) COIN, fame size as the La, bf the. Landcrave of hen anno 1737 ; a large SILVER COIN, lir.: u: a ertwea o" c m :a Hen. Eke. Cologne. anno 1441); alfu a LIMA SHILLING Gt.,. IL 1745 . Application to Vieffrs Elate (I by Lutz putt paid), will he attended to. . TO MERCHAN FS AND WHOLESALE GROCERS. TO BE I.E For a Term of Years, and entered upon immediately, 1 1 H E Ex TENSIVE 1111 d VALUASLI WA RE. . HOUSES and other PREMISES, fituote as. F.A3 SIDE of the SANDHILL. Nv.wcAs 11. E UPON- 1 1',Sr:. within a kV, ya7dx of the River . , lately orcupled by Mr. Limn Atkinfoo Rudniag,dezeofed, the boOntfs ga a wy o w ahe Grocer and the fix Trade have for many ymrs beau c:rriel nu to a great extent.— Flee Regrinds is intended to he enstioued until the Premitcs are Ict. The connexions of Cie H nee acothe fig i g eg ss North of England, and the Stock in Trade will he d (141(.4 a l on Terms highly advantageous to a purrhafer. For particulars apply to Mt. Baker on the Pnauiti, or at Ai-. Wa!ters's Office, Pilgrim-Bre , t, Newcaftle. LKel'iß FROM DEAL un 012. Stlttikcr t,i DEAFNEfii. To the Proprietor of Dr. Tayl•tr's Rented, S:r, " Peal, Mar t. 1805, g 4 VIAVING feen the Names of feVend l'edons, 11 publiated in the Sun, who haw received benefit rem t h, invaluable Retnealy fur 1). of ere ; i beg leave to inform you, that 1 have lately received a eumpizt.: cure, after h.tying Iron .lepric,tl of My hearing fur the bit five year.. 1 have tired one battle. 1 remain, Sir, pew mull °Wird humble Servant, •• JOHN AIRIN." P. S. You are et Sherty to make what ore you ' , leak of it. The original I cater may he feed at Ntra. Matthews, boAftiter, 13. Strand , London. of wilt m •itt: n mcdy may he had, DIXON'S celebrated it N at I.l6Lis tfCCS, yrepared by Mr. Diten, Apothecary, arc a ern do cur:. foe Bill: ui.Gouty, and Rheumatic I , i:orders. Nrtvous and Sick I had Atha, !lean-born, FLatuicucies, Weak,efs of the s.nulaci., laeprd. Gun of Spirits, indigellian, and Frc Living. Sec. They are ufcd zrd recommended by tire Royal Family. rise r& eountiffes Buckingham and Unities, the IDow,ger I a ly SI and Sete, the Lords Klimain and Ki-g, the lion. 1. Malrey,Sir R Wit. Hams, M. P. and fume tinauf.nda of the Nubility, Clergy, as.l Ma. dical Gentlemen. In addition to the nuinhcr or Letters Mr. Dixon, Apothecary, has received, is the following, from Cap e . Lloyd, of the Guards: . "Dale Caltl-, II tverfordwca. Sou: h Wad., Feb 14, 'Sit. " Capt. Lloyd preftnt a his co leplitatents to Mr Disou (slitsougt ; not perfonally acquainted with hi.r.). would take it As a ',sour if he would fend him lour or five B , sea of his Milt a, f um as lie put: fibly can. Mrs. Lloyd, who has always used the Mediciue, is now pr:gnant, and very uawell ; and we cum.* get them a:ly where in this county, neither at ILverfordw.:fl nor Carmarthen; the neat ett place they are fold at is &lila For the great fcrvice they have been to Mrs Lloyd, as well as Colonel Bilopp and all hi, Eimily, Capt. Lloyd feels it his da - y to rceunarnmel the Pitt, w!acevcr he goes, and he really thinks if Mr. 111 x on would appoint fame mix* as Venders in this County it would be a benefit to the mammary.* Dienn's Antibilious fills are fold whnlcf le aid retail at Mr. Beithes. No. 4,Cheapf de, corner of raterrulter row, and retail by Smith and Scott, Edinburgh : M'Conalel, Glz(guw : Greg" Liverpool; Staines, Man , Lefier ; ;Vo- er, Fatter; Wills, Ply. mouth &Urn, Po tryou:h ; Macdonald's. Gligow ; GITO4, 13.1rhadoes; B.ich, New Yolk; and by mad; Leolefeliers and Mc dicine Venders in every town, in butes at as. yd. tuch. Obtrac the name of " IL ILieer, No. celicapekierlsengraved on the Stamp, which is affixed to each how. iik - . - COM(l:i't AN rt-impt i IGh.NkS. DR. JOHN HUN FElt and many other medical men have treated mafterly on cartain complairts. hut they all fillow the Reps of theft . prodeccEurs. Mercury, Mercury, is (till their grand climat eric! and wh'i.:ll, at twithftanding al its alledged improvements and consbenaTiens, is Mercury never bel c h! But the Anti linpttigenes has long been ailed in au cuenftvepti vate pradiee, and in a multiplicity of inflances found to be a lb. vereign, a life, a fvedy, and e flati tad remedy far every Itage and fymptom, and is the beft lubltitutc ever difcrivered in,r .. ‘,ereury ; it fweetens the blood, and itienulatee it to excel all tonna& and im pure juices; gives Strength cr.d tone to the nerves, enlivens and in vigorates, at one and the fame time, both body and miliel; it juttly claims a pre eminence over all °the:- medicines, being decid.dity adapted for the fpeedy removal of there complain•s as well as the feure•y, fcrofula, King's Evil, and even the leprofy idelf ; it is not to be paralleled in the wh le hialeria Medi:a high as the 'acuity now (laud to the opinion of the world, their ' fandlion is daily given to this z•imirahle prrparaion, which takes its name on let the authority of the great Cullen of Edinburgh (by whole Nofulngy on the Pradlica or Pity:re every Itylician is sh redded ;) its elßeacy being well eft .lltifted for thole clirlul cale mines which compreheakorhutic, leprous, femfulotari,anel vene real complaints, for which the Anti.-Itryctigcncsis happily adapted. Haifa-Guinea a Bottle, with copious folio dir,ctioni, co enable pet lons to cure theinfelves, lit which many actrac•clieaf-y cafe* are publifiied. There are alto loudly Bottles. ccutsiairg the quantity of four at les. 6d. for In. by which 9s. ate laved. Note—Each bottle tat a Government Stamp, with the name • Sand. Solomon, Liverpool,' cligrsved thereon, to imitate will& ia felmv. Sold in London by Mrs. Mathews, a?, Strand ; Dizey and Sut ton, Bow Church-yard; Bacon, tsa, 0 ribill4treet • P:dding.76,os ford ftreet.oppolits. the Pantheon; Butler, 4,Cheaptide ; dia.:lay and Son, Ilea -market; S!Dsv and Edwards, 66, St. Paul's Church yard; Howard and Evans, Long-Lane, Welt-Smittalield; aud par ticularly at the foUrawMg places, viz. Brad. Mn Shit:rein( Lynn, Pigge Bath, Hazard Mancheiter, Staines Berwick, Carr NI iryar,•, Silver Balioitt ke, Hulbert l'elciall•am, lio•re Bradford, Wilts, Hopkins Maidenhead, :haul! Bridport, R• b•rcs • Nlalroftury, Lea Bridgwater, Poole 1h1.4:111ing...1%T, Wilkinfoa Bawdley, Prmthigon N •rtirghatn, liur:E.g.: & Suet Steelier, Stephens ton Ltr,raf.rd, Nit bury NewealUe upon Tyne,Hutchao- Bratntofter Hine foil and Cu. tillo•us W;lthatn, Jennings • Norwich, St, vorfon Baintree, Shearcrutt . E ewp•rt, Ille af W Ight, Albie Coeentiy, ivierrith w Nlntwich, Snelfon cauterbuiy, Briftow °Cor , 'llrY• Edwards Caatur, 1;•.oth 1 1 , tin; h, Smithy Chatham, Ethaingtos Partial', J. and W. Breland Candu Mae, Hodfria Partin •uth, Sharpe Cticp,tow, Marna Plymouth ' Nettleton Clapham, Batten Plym orth Dock , Holland Dover, Neale) htektuaidWorrh, Nona Dina •hle, („),ccniborongis It Ili hford, Wads Dud" y, Harding Sbellield, Pierian Deptf:ret, Davits Stonfurtiadsle wituink Denham, Barker •Stsfford, Monaca Dahlia, No. 6. College Green, Shrewfbury, Wood Dugdale, Colwell, Buil S'o,rls.o.nae, t:eadby and Gs. Edinburgh, A. Smith, North S- smut elbstr, Night Bridge Selaihrorp•oli, Baker Exeter, Trewania and $Oll Sal•fbury, Coi: ma Ely, Brat kenbury Shdtlbuiy, Adams Fr :me, lialiall Salim Walden ; Paine Giauceller, Jones St.•mbridge, Ro lafun Griport, Hurling Shistou Mallet, Carey GainCaorsiugh, Towne Brockton, Ci•rtftupher & Jens& Greenwich, Braise Tav Bch, Row, Glafjosr, Aneus M‘Donald • Twickenham. Mortimer Hull, J. Radford Tunbridge Wells,Ktlislei Honicaftle, Weir lsrost bridge, s lung liammerimith, Roberts • rttoseter, t•I den li, eaky on Thames, Norton Whitby, T , oman Hanley, Altman and San Whitchaven, Croftwaite Hes ham, Diekinfon Warkfworth. Taylor , Ipfwich, Harmer and Green Wisolfar, Blakeney invernefs, Wiens& Wuttotionader.E.dge, Bence Esitiatsford, Leech Welli: , ptan, Salop, Houlltoa Keivedon, Fux Woivrehan•rt n, Simplon Leeds, Mims Wild r, WAley !decrying!, Rayfat Welch Punie, Griei.hs Lank. r, Grearary York, Wilton and Co. Lancalter, Clark And all the Venders of Patent Medicines In the United Kingdom • HIGH WATER AT LONDON lIRIGGR . TO-MORRO W . Maiming •• • to -drums after il Alterman - ' ' 43 minutes eta 8 ---- LONDON : Printcd m d PubliE•ed by LEVEL KEN r (of C. • tcrlv4try pkce. Lam'leth), at the Stitt Orrici, No. I, c L-.. r area. kublifbalalfo du Sma Tonigol.4, O a n you *ate "AO& the Chaim,lut ettldlirtelletter 'fed at any time any apprehenfion arifing from the irregularity of the proceeding?--I donut remember his ever ezpreffing any fuels opprehenfion. Did you expects or enfermht nt the time any appreltenfion of ir regularity in the traefaelion 7—The tranfadion was certainly new, no occalion baying arifen fince the palling of the Ad 37 Geo. 111. which rendered it neceffary to have recoorfe to loch an expedient ; but if in the term " irregularity," the fl ehteft degree of Impropriety is implied in that fenfe, I cannot admit it to be ir regular, and of court's: could not have expreffesl any fuels opinion. Did you refer to the Adt of 37 Geo. 111. with a view of Ricer taMing whether there was any thing in that Adt which appeared to prohibit the iffue of theft referred at the time to that Act, and to an Ad of the 34 Gets. lfl. and was fatisfied there was noshing in either of thofe Atts to prohibit fuch an ilTuc. Were you aware of any other It acute which regulated the iffue of Navy Bills ?—I did not refer to any other, nor sin I aware that there is any other that regulates the ilfue of Navy Bills. 1 be Examinathn of Sit AvnR.FO- SNAP": HAMoND, Bart. How do you account for the difference between the letter tnt by you to the Ornmithoners of Naval Enquiry en the 30th of Novena. her lilt, and the copy of it tranfmitted by you to the Lords of the Admiralty on the aid of April lift 7—lf it does d ffer i t the insane:ft degree, I can only expects my furprife and re3ret.as it moil have happened without the (mallet intention on my part. I folk wrote a draft of the linter, which I °sewed to one of the Commif fiances of the Navy t his approbation ; that diet la la enameled in feveral places, and written fair by the Deputy Secretary, and fuels fair copy was fin Al by me, and fent to the Cominiffioners of Naval Enquiry ; as to the date, it mutt evidently have appeared to the Commiflioners that was a miftake, as their precept, to which this letter was an anfwer, was dated the isth of November, and as my letter in taking notice of their precept mentioes the ryth in- Rata, there could not be the fmallelt doubt but that my letter was written on the loth of November, inflead of the :,ctli off eptcm her ; and though I perceive by the ktter now produced to me, that there arefcvcral words, though nut the fame, yet importing the fame meaning, I truth it will appear whatever Mincer there may be, the lubtlinee is in no d. gree changed. Front what document in the Navy Office was the ropy of the letter No. i t made, which was tr.:emitted to the Admiralty 7 Fr..on the very famedraft, b t cryied by another Clerk. Does that document Rill remain in the Navy Office 7-1 under (land it does not ; but the Clerk is here who will explain that. Can you account to the Committee for the ciretwollarce of the original draft, which was in the Navy Office in April loft, not be ing there now I—When the Clerk made out copies of all the pa pers which I fent to the Admiralty on the lad April, I remember his telling me that he had made fair copies of all nay drafts of the letters, and that as the one in queltion was very much fcratched, he allied me if I had any objection to his tearing it ; to which I agreed. Were any other of your drafts, of which he made a fair copy st , . that time. deft royed 7 7 -1 rather think they were. DIVIDENDS. ruly 11. William Hawkins, John Hawkins and Thomas Hawkins, of Birminghrm, button-makers and copartners, at four, at the fhakefpraez Tavern, Birmingham. July 12. William Hawkins, of Birmingham, button-maker, at four, at the Shakefpeare Tavern, Birmingham. duly rs. John Hughes, or Liverpool,draper,at three,at the Bridge ratcr Arms Inn, Nit - achelter. . July z t. Cil Slater, late of Liverpool, merchant, at twelve, at the York Hotel. Williarnfon lquare. Liverpool. liIR I H. At Mount Pleafant, oil Sunday fAinight, the lady of the Rev. Dean Kirwan, of a fon. On the 20th ult. at Nen' Pun, the lady of Sir Jattes N.fmyth, of a fon. MARRIED. On Wednefilay laft, by fprcial licence, Captain Robert Dudley Sliver, of the Royal Navy, to Mifs S...ston, daughter of Sir Charles .:lazton, Bart. CommilLoner of his Majefty's Navy. DIED. On Friday Lalt, tt Ferrybridge, on his road from town, after a horsing Rings, aged 65, the Rev Edward Bawerhank, B. D. Redtor of Croft and T.trniauham, both in the Notch Riding of Yorkihire, and Prebendary of Lincoln. Thurfday evaling.fuddenly, at lodgings at affirm, aged 43, Major-General Magan, lately iu the command of the garrifon of Briftol. As the General was io the an. of wiping the powder from his face, after having dread for dinner, be was feized with a fit, Raggcred hack into a chair, and in the (pace of an hour and a half he expired.