Star. — London, England, 1825-03-23 00:00:00

little freehold of his own, in the neighbourhood of Tideswell. The defendant was a man in a similar rank of life, but a man of more property, The plaintiff was older than his wife, but not so much as to affect their connubial happiness. He was a little more than sixty, and she was about forty. The defendant was upwards of sixty—(A laugh). The marriage took place as far back as 1809 ; and since that event the woman, or Lady, had borne the plaintiff eight children. But what was a great aggravation in this case, it was impossible to say how many of those children belonged to the plaintiff—(A laugh). The plaintiff was in the habit of carrying the produce of his farm to market, and it was upon these occasions that the defendant undermined the virtue of his friend's wife. How long the COnnec. tion had subsisted it was impossible to say, but it could be traced as fat back as seven or eight years. The de fendant frequently going to plaintiff's house when he was absent, induced the friends of his client to use vigi lance. The plaintiff had some suspicions, but he was living on in a state of the greatest misery, doubting, yet hoping, that his wife was pure. The plaintiff's wife and the defendant were watched, and be should be able to spew that the defendant had taken the grossest and most indecent liberties with her. He could see that the Jury was struck by the levity with which his Learned Ft tend treated this case—( Mach lankier, in which the Learned Seiieant could not refrain front joiaimg). But the Jury would read his friend a lesson that would not be easily forgotten, and teach him, that though it was sport to him, it was death to his unfortunate client.— He should sheer that indecent liberties were observed to have been taken many years ago with the plaintiff's wife, and that his friends refrained from telling him, because they were afraid of wounding, without serving him. However, the completion of the offence he should be able to prove from the defendaat's own acknowledg ment ; for it was with him, as it was with many others, that amongst a great deal of knavery, there was mixed no little folly. He should stew that the defendant had been vile enough to make a declaration of his guilt in a public-house. The fellow is red-haired, and he told the company in this public-house that his stock was bet ter than Wilson's, and that they might be known, for they bad red hair—t Laughter). He had audacity enough to claim two of the children as his own, and it was said that a mote correct facsimile of the fellow could not he produced—(lmmense laughter). Yes, true it was, that two of these must unhappy off.piing had the un speakable misfortune to carry the burning shame upon their heads (Continued laughter). His Learned Friend might say, why were they not brought hete to-day? That would be a most unseemly thing, to stick the little urchins upon the table, and then make their poor red heads the object of every fool's jest. Besides, there might be people who would maliciously say, why really, the children are not unlike his Learned Friend, the C.immon Sri jeant, Mr. Reader, or, indeed, any of the Gentlemen of the Jury—(Great &teeter). He did nut press for heavy damages, but the Jury would give such as si °old teach a man of sixty-orie years of age, that he could not throw the reins upon the neck of his passions, and make havoc upon the domestic affections, with impunity. Nathaniel Womireofe, the parish clerk of Little Ilucklow, proved the marriage of the plaintiff with his present wife, iu 1809. Mr. Cosmos Septum was proceeding to ask the witness some questions about the Bull's.head, public-house, at Hucklow, which was kept by the plaintiff's wife's lather, when Mr. SerjeantVatiettan object, d to any question bring put about bulls, unless they related to the bull—the defendant.—(A laugh). Mr. Baron Huttoce said the question was certainly irrelevant. Edward Harbert examined.-1 am the brother-in-law of the plaintiff. The plaintiff and his wife lived Kap ply together. He made her a good husband—a very good husband. I saw something in 1818 which excited my suspicions. We went about that time to a funeral —Bagshaw was there; as we came along the road, he laid his arm round my sister's waist, bat I prevented him doing more. Some time after this, Wilson went to Stockport market, I watched the defendant; I saw the defendant go to plaintiff's wife about nine o'clock in the morning ; he went away and came again about ten o'clock. I have seen him take liberties with her at Christmas, of all times in the year. I saw a big'light in Wilson's house. I had a thatch-peg in my Until There were two or three holes in the windows of plain tiff's house, and a great big blazing fire in the house. De endatat was there. Plaintiff was gone to Sheffield. 1 watched defendant, and saw him take Mrs. Wilson round the waist and kiss her. They then went into a dark passage. There are two red-headed children: There were six children before a red-headed one came. I don't know whether they are like plaintiff or defendant. Cross-examined by Mr.COMMON•SIMICANT..-4 mar-1 vied the plaintiff's wife's sister. My mother-in-law kept the Bull's Head, at Little Hucklow. There was nothing improper going on there. No kissing in the pasaages, nor locking in the rooms. I did not tell the plaintiff about the defendant taking liberties with her at the fu neral. I would not tell him, because I thought it would breed a partition between them. I never saw anybody else take liberties with Mts. Wilson. I never heard Wilson say that he would not have brought the Action, if defendant had not asked him for some money which he, plaintiff, owed the defendant. Hannah Herbert examined.-1 remember being at Tideswell Fair, in October last. I was at a public house. Bagshaw was there ; heard Bagshaw say that lie was a better man, and had better stock, than Old Wilson ; be said his children had red hair. The youngest - but two, and the youngest, are the only ones that have red hair. Plaintiff has not red hair; defendant has. Mr. Berm Hm.s.ocir.—This is proving. a pedigree rather than an act of adultery. Cress-ezantincd.—l ant the sister of the last witness. I have not beard abou t the owing the defendant mostry.l William Sat ezantined.—l knew Bagshaw ; 2 went to TidesweU Fair in October, for you must know I bad a little bad ness to settle. Mr. Scrjeant Valuagan.—Never mind your business, but tell us what passed at the public-house between Bagshaw and you. Sk, I had a little badness to settle, and I went to the public-house, and called far a glass of rum and wader. It was warm. Mr. Serjeant Vaiussu.—Tell us what the defendant Baphaw said. Never mind about the rum and water. Witness—But you must hear about Bob Bagshaw first. I had got my ram and wailer in my hand, and I had four or five sups at it. Bagshaw says sup it up, and ha' a sup wi' me: Nay, says. I, I do'ant want any of your rutn and warier ; I can pay for rum and warier myself. Says be, what have you to say against our Bob? But I have o're-run my story. I should he told you that Bob is a butcher, and Now, out of his time. He is a tidy made chap enough. Now, they tell me that Bob hasbeen atter our Suki—that's my daughter ; but I never seed him about the house mysel, never, or I should ha' forbid him, that's sure enough ; for I do'ant like the breed ; it's a bad breed, in my opinion, and Bake shall saver be him by my consent. Bat, says . IBaritaire why ...met you let your daughter have4ob ?1 Bekase, says I, I do'ant like your breed, and never did. Says he, Bob is able to get a good lleing. Says I, that may be, but he shan't have my daughter • I do'ant like the breed, Gentlemen, and never did. ilut, says he, Bob would have something worth having. Nay, but. .eays I, he shan't have my daughter though, for all that. Says he, my breed is not a very bad breed ; look at my red-haired stock at Wilson's. -The doctor was there; I mean the man-midwife, and he wur dunning Bagshaw for laying Wilson's wife. He was axing Bagshaw for the money for doctoring Wilson's wife when she war brought to bed. Pretty devil of a tale, thinks I, For him to be axing Bagshaw for the money for such a job. I wur *end, bekase I thought Wilsnn was queerly, but I heated it talked of for years. Bagshaw said, his was a better stock than Wilson's; they had all red hair. *He said he had had her with him at his own house. Cron-examined by Mr. COMMON SIDUZANT.—I was not very well pleased to hear Bagshaw's talk. There was an old quarrel between us. He is a queer chap, I can tell you. I have several daughters married, and one is married to my brother. He might say, I had better marry her to Bob, than to my brother. We have never been very friendly, for he is a roughish customer: The doctor was joking with him ; Oh, no. I did'ut rightly un derstand you, it was no joke. It wor the talk of the whole neighbourhood. and had been for years. I told Wilson about it. He said that he had never seen note (nothing) clearly, but be had heard about it often. I said if you have not you must have bin deaf and dumb; I could ha' found it oat years ago if I had been in your place. The youngest of the red-haired stock is about five or six years of age, I should think, but I don't know exactly. He is a good slapping chap. Re-examined by Mr. lisz.ouv.—Bagshaw lives upon his own Prolberty. He ne'er does no work—not he. During the examination of this witness the whole Court was in a roar of laughter. It was in vain so endeavour to keep him to the point in qiiestion. He could not tell anything, unless he was al lowed to talk about his daughter Suke and Bob Bagshaw. Mr. Baron Houciex.—What do you think, Mr. SerjeantVaughan, now, of the proposal that was this morning made? I don't see what you can do with such a case as this—but do as you please. After some consultation, the parties agreed to withdraw a Juror. George Batty, aged 36, was indicted for having vio lated and abused the person of Miss Martha Hawkes ley, aged 16 years. Francis Ellis, aged 19 years, was charged with aiding and abetting George Batty. Miss Hawkesley was accompanied by her mother into the witness-box. She appeared to be handsome, and a fine grown young Lady, but much dejected and agitated. She said that she was returning with her sister, a girl about 14 years of age, from Sheffield, to her father's house, on Friday week, and her sister called at Mrs. Dyson's. Witness wa ted outside, and the two pri soners passed her; she knew Ellis before; they went the same road ; her sister was in Dyson's about five' minutes; she and her sister went by Bagshaw Wood' on their return home; they had passed two fields be fore anything happened. At the bottom of Great Tom's Crush Field site again saw the prisoners ; she was getting over a stile with her sister, when Batty put his arms round her neck, and she cried •' Murder r Sh e g ot from him ; he pursued and forced her into a hedge, and pushed her through it. He put his finger in:o her mouth, and she bit it badly; she scratched his face; she asked him what she should give him to let her go away? and lie name she should not go till he had done with her. (Witness was gr.. atly affected.) He effected his purpose. When he left her, he sad, with an oath, " You may go now, I have done with sou." She went home, and told her father and mother she had been ill-used ; she did not state the particular injury till raga day, and then she told her sister.—Cross-examineds The struggle lasted 20 minutes; her sister left her whoa she cried Murder ! She saw the prisoner'Batty next dad he came to beg her pardon. The sister of the aliOns' witness corroborated her evidence. Jahns Hawkesley, the faih.r ef the girl, said, that on the Friday night his daughter came home with her fate • coveted' with blood, and in a very forlorn Condi titin ; B..ttly was apprehended next day, and said, " the , devil was m him, and be deserved to be hanged." His finger was iejured. • Other evidenie, cirroblratory of the above, was VMS not put' on his•defence. tatty was found, Guilty. "" James Clarke, aged 62, and Henry Clarke, aged 2.5,1 were indicted with George Cdarke (who has absconded). with feloniously killing and - slaying George Wildgoose,l on the 6th of September last, at Washington.—Thomas Atkin was at the Horse and Jockey public-house on the 28th August last. George Clarke and George Wild-1 goose talked about fighting for agninea. it was to be; a fair stand-up 'figlit. There're: to be no purring' (kicking on the ribs) or Um/iv (catching below the breeches and throwing down.) Witness was at the fight on Washington Greens. When George Clarke was on his second': knee, Henry Clarke said to him, Why don't you follow him, crush him, and fall into him; you may fight this way for a week." Beth fell, on the ground atter this. Witnesi bend something like a clash. Wildgoose tried to fight inether round but could not; he was put up, but he fell back appa rently senseless.—ln cross-examination, witness said they fought for an hour ; the constables were present looking on ; twenty rounds were fought ; witness could not say that "fall into him," means " throw yourself upon him." Wildgoose frequently threw himself down ; witness did not see him kick out his feet at his antagonist.--Other witnesses were examined ; The deceased lived twenty minutes only after the fight. In cross-examination, they said, that the piisoners at the bar did not inter fere in the fight any more than any one else. John Kirk heard the prisoner, James Clarke ' , say to his son George `Ge Why . don't you turn* into him, *with your knees or elbows into his guts." Mr. John Wheeler, surgeon, proved that the death was caused by a rupture of a bjood 'Vessel. • It 'mig4 have been caused by exertion, or' by a fall. Witnesses were called, who deposed that it ma fair fight, and that the prisoners were merely lookereos.— Verdict-I%ot Guilty. CAMBRIDGE, MARCH 19. - • DAVLICNIR v. ELDER AND OVUM This was an action brought by the plaintiff, a cler gynian, and a Member of the University of Cambridge, against the defendants, who- were the Churchwardens of the Parish of St. Sepulchre, in this town, in the year 1823, for not nominating him to the perpetual curacy of that parish, he having been duly elected, The ac tion was brought upon a return to a writ of eseedanses, issued from the Court of King's Bench, ordering- the defendants to nominate the plaintiff to the curacy ; and the cause now came to-issue to try whether the right of election was in the parishioners, and that votes which were tendered at the election for the plaintiff, and re. fused, were refused on legal rights, and can neatly to decide whether the plaintiff or the Rev. Was the person duly elected under these circumstance:, About the month of November, INS, the Rev. Mti. Faucett,who had held the corny for nearly thirty years. resigned it. On that resignation, the plaintiff and the Rev. Mr. Robinson, also of the University, became the candidates for the perpetual curacy in question, which yielded a sum of about 621. 10s. per annum, a salaty paid by the tenant of the lands of two estates, one at Hemmington Abbott:, in Huntingdonshire, and the Other in town of Cambridge. Regular notice being given of the election, a vestry wascalled, and a meeting of the parishioners convened in the Church, when a Mr, Abbott took the chair, and the meeting proceeded to vote by ballot for the Candidates, and the business wa: going on very harmoniously, when a Mr. Ashton, .a so licitor of the town of Cambridge, entered the meeting, armed with a hook, which was entitled The Church wardeui and Overseers Guide—one of those .guides which, the Learned Counsel for the plaintiff re marked, more then misled people than guided them, as it misled the whole parish in ibis instance. From this book he read a passage, which stated that no one could elect but those who paid the Church rate. Upon the authority of this book, and coming from a legal man, Mr. Abbot, the Chairman, and the Church wardens yielded, and the votes of five persons for the plaintiff were consequently refused, and which, if re ceived, would have given a majority to the plaintiff, his poll standing at the ending of the election at 34, and Mr. Robinson's S 6. There were two votes refused, which were tendered for Mr. Robinson, one that of a Jew, and the other of a person named Everett, which, it was contended by the Counsel for the plaintiff, that he intended to have given for the plaintiff, and had ex pressed his determination to that effect. It was also contended, that a Jew could hardly be considered to , have a vote in an election of this kind. The question now at issue was, to ascertain if those votes had been properly rejected, and for the plaintiff to establish the right of those persons to elect ? It was also urged, as it was proved in evidence, that the parties who were, rejected, never had been called upon for years be- . fore for the Church rate, and that they were all house holders, and paid the poors' rate. Under these circum-, stances, and the state of the poll, Mr. Robinson was the .person who was returned by the Churchwardens—and the correctness of that election now became the subject of the deliberation of the Jury. The case for the plaintiff being proved in evidence, and that the custom and right of electing existed in the parishioners, it was contended for the defendant that, ,prior to the votes being taken, the question as to pay ing the poor-rates was put to the meeting, and that the sense of the meeting, in concurring with the proposi tion, was evident, by their coming to the resolution of excluding those who had not paid the church -rate, from voting. It was contended that the esclusion was not illegal, as the measure was a preliminary one to the proceeding of the election, and one agreed to by the major part of the parishioners. Several points of law were taken by the defendant's Counsel, which were re served for the Court above. The Learned Judge struck out one of the plaintiff s 1 vote , , as being that of a person who was not ,a house holder. This reduced the plaintiff's number to SS. He then put the facts of the case, as to the votes, to the Jury, who found that the five persons for the plaintiff had tendered their votes, thereby making his number 38, and found that Mordecai, and the parish clerk, and Everett, intended to vote for the Rev. Mr. Robinson. A nominal verdict of £2OO was taken fur plaintiff. EXETER, MARCH 19. Thomas BWls was indicted (or committing an assault of a serious nature on the person et Sarah Pepe, aged fifteen years.—The prokecutriz, a simple country girl, said, that on tne 24th of September last, she was making her master% cows to the fi Id, and the prisoner fol. lowed her and repeatedly took' liberties with her ; after she had left the field, lie seized her round the waist, and dragged her to a place Where he completed his purpose.—lot Thomas Horse was indicted for committing a similar offence on Anna Pycraft. She stated the facts of the case, and was examined by Mr. Justice BURROUOII, but persisting in her refusal to reply to his question as to her having met persons on the road when walking with the prisoner after he had taken liberties with her, and be- , fore . the completion of the offence, the Judge directed an acquittal. Elisabeth Bissell and Caroline Bissdt were indicted for sending threatening letters to Mrs. Bond, of Chum leigh, the Landlady of the Butchers' Arms public house. It appeared that about eighteen years ago there was a fire at the Rock House, Chumleiph, and a cot tage was destroyed. On the 16th March, Mrs. Bond received a letter from the prisonerElizabeth,threatening, if she dist not give her ten guineas that she would ac cuse her to the insurance office of setting fire to the cot tage. The girl wrote the letter at her mother's dictation. The mother was found Gaily, the daugh ter Not Guilty. Augustus Milburn and William Stevens, were indicted for sending threatening letters to Mrs. Bond, with a, view of extorting money.—Mrs. Bond stated, that the prisoners came to her house, and said that Mrs. Bissell had swoin that she had set fire to the Rock Homes, and it she did not pay ten guineas, they were to go to 'Squire Fellows for a warrant, and she would be hanged. She was much agitated, and said she would pay fifty guineas. The prisoners produced what they said was a letter from Mr. Millets, an Attorney of Exeter, and an affidavit sworn by Mts. Bissett.—The prisoners were apprehended, and no such person as Millen, the Attorney, could be found in Exeter. The prisoners were both found Guilty, and sentenced to fourteen years transportation. IRSLAND. --00......... WEXFORD ASSIERE-CRIM. CON. STORRS V. BRADSHAW. This was an action brought by Doctor Stokes. of Eaniscorthy, against Mr. Bradshaw, a baker of Arklow, for criminal conversation with the plaintiff's wife.— Damages were laid at five thousand pounds. Mr. SCOTT rose, and said he had the satisfaction to (state to his Lordship and the Jury, that this cause was to proceed no further, an agreement having been made between the parties. Though the circumstances might disappoint many persons who had come fur amusement on the occasion, yet it would relieve the Gentlemen of the Jury from the painful necessitT of having to listen to, a. long, tedious. and disgusting trial, which no man of any sensibility could listen to with pleasure. Mr. DICILOWS stated that the parties were very re spectable, and that the plaintiff would have had to pro duce the sisters and other relations of the Lady as wit nesses ; and it was to spare the feelings of those relatives ibat the plaintiff had counted to drop the prosecution _ THE aervAr C 'Begotten LONDON M4TOII The following is an at count of the *hole of the moves in the lete grand match betareen the London and Edinburgh Chess Clebs t which was won by the latter Lotions, While--Ebantoaau, 1. W. Kind's Pawn two squares.—B. The saute. 2. W. King's Knight to his Bishop's third isleare.—E. Queen's Knight to her Bishop's third square. 5. W. Queen's Pawn two squares.—B. The Pawn takes thenwis 4. W. The, King's Bishop to Queen's Bishop's fourth square._ B. The seine. & W. The Qmon's Bishop's Pawn one square.—B. The Queed to King's second square. I. W. The King castles.-11. The Pawn at W. Queen's four* square takes the Pawn. 7. W. The. Queen's Knight takes the Pawn..' B. The Queen's Pawn one square. S. W. The Queen's Knight to the adverse Queen's fourth squarer .—ra. The Queen to her second square. g. W. The Queen's Knight's Pawn two squares.—B. The Queen'. Knight takes the Pawn. 10. W. The-Queen's Knight takes the Knight.—B. The Kinell Bishop takes the Knight. 11. W. The King's Knight to the B. King's Knight's 4th squaring B. The King's Knight to the Rook's third square. 12. W. The Queen's Bishop to the Queen's Knight's 2d square—a B. The King to his Bishop's square. 13. W. The Queen to her Knights third square..—B. The Queen to the King's second square. 14. W. The King's Knight takes the King's Bishop's Pawn.—Bs The King!. Knight takes the Knight. IS. W. The Queen takes the Bishop.—B. The •Kino Knight to the King's fourth square. 16. W. The. King's Bishop's Pawn two sinarese-11. The Knight takes the Bishop. 17. W. The Queen takes the Knight.—B. The Queen's to the King's Bishop's second. IL W. The Queen to her Bishop's third•square.—B. The Queen s Bishop to the Lot's third square. 19. W. The King's Bishop's Pawn one square.—B. The Queen's B. so the W. Queen's B'ishop's fourth square. 20. W. The King's Rook to the King's Bishop's fourth square.— , B. The Queen's Knight's Pawn two squares. 21. W. The King's Pawn one square.—B. The Queen's Pawls takes the Pawn. 22. W. The Queen takes the Pawn.-42. The King's Rooks Paws one square. 23. W. The Queen's Rook to the King's square.—B. The King's Rook to its second square. 24. W. The King's Bishop's Pawn one square.—B. The King's Knight's Pawn two squares. 2.5. W. The King's Rook to B. King's Bishop's fourth square... , B. The Queen's Rook's Pawn two squares. *. W. The Queen check. at B. Queen's ikshop's fourth squared —B. the King to his Knight's Tare. 17. W. The King's Rook takes Kings Knight's Pawn, checking,— B. The Hook's Pawn takes the Rook. W. W. The Queen takes the Pawn, checking.—B. The King to his Bishop's square. 19. W. The Queen to the B. Queen's Bishop's fourth square, check. ing.—l3. The King to his Knight's square. 10. W. The Queen to the E. Quern's Knight's 4th square, check ing.—B. The King to his Bishop's square. 3,i. W. The Queen's Bishop to the Queen's fourth.— B. The King's Bishop to the King's third. 32. W. The Queen's Bishop to the B. Queen's Bishop's 4th, check , ing.—B. The King to kis square. 33. W. The Queen to the adverse Queen's fourth equate.—B. The Queen's Rook took hs third square. 34. W. The Queen to the B. Queen's Knight's second square.-- B. The Queen to the King's Rook's fourth square. 36. W. The King's Bishop's Pawn one square, checking.—B. The King takes the Pawn. 36. W. The Queen's Rook to the King's Bishop's square, checking. —B. The King to the Knight's third square. • 57. W. The Queen to bee Kiss's fourth square, checking.—B. The Ring's Bishop interposes at King Bishop's fourth. 311 ? W. The Queen to the adverse King's square, checking. —Ba The King's Rook interposes at the King's Bis tro ? second. 39. W. Queen checks at the adverse King's Knight's square.—B. The King to his Bishop's third square. 40. The King's Knight's Pawn two squares.—B. The Queen's Rook to its square. 41. W. The Queen takes the Queen's Rook.—B. The Queen takes the King's Knight's Pawn. checking. 411. W. The King to his Rook's square.—B. The Rook to the Queen's amend square. 43. W. The Queen's Bishop to the Queen's Rook's third square. The King to his Bishop's wcond square. 44. W. The Queen to the adverse Queen's Rook's square.— it The Rook to the adverse Queen's square. 44. W. The Queen takes the Queen's Knight's Pawn.-11. The 44. ruto the adverse King's fourth square, checking. n", King to his Knight's square.—B. The King to his Knight's third square. 47. W. The Queen to iser Knight's leased square.—B. The Queen to, W. King's Knight's fourth, checking. 49. W. The Queen interposes at the King's Knight's second.—B. The Queen takes the Omen. 49. W. The King takes the Queen.—B. Ihe Bishop to the W. King's Rook's third. checking. 50. W. The King takes the Bishop.—B. The Rook takes the Rook. Si. W. The Bisbvp to the adverse King's second.—B. The Rook to hii King's Bithop'a fourth square. SC W. The Queens Rook's Pawn one square.—B. The Queen's Bishop's. Pawn two squares. (The White gave up the game) A letter from Honduras, of December 11, states, thnt the Carib, have taken Truzillo, and some French people. The European Spaniards have been driven away, many of whom had reached Honduras in small craft. About 160 Caribs had gone to Rattan to settle. Mr. Cameszt:x has addressed a letter to ti e Editor of the Edinkurgh Review, denying an observation in the last number of that work, that his poem of Thee Last Man, first published in the New . Monthly Magazixe,had been suggested by Lord BYRON'S poem of Darkness.— Oa the contrary, Mr. Cannata. says, that fifteen years ago, in a conversation with Lord Briton, he remarked to his Lordship, that he thought the idea of a being witnessing the extinction of his species and of the Crea tion, and.of his looking, under the fading eye of Na ture, at desolate Cities, ships flitting at sea with the dead, would make a striking subject for a Poem."— Mr. tAiilltalgl.l. says, he has no doubt that this conver sation suggested. to Lord BYRON the idea of his poem of Darkness. "He either, " says Mr. C. 4g thought mr Suggestions fair game, or forgot that it was not himself who had started them." Mr.CAUNIRLL certainly vin dicates his claim to originality of idea without imputing any blame to Lord BYRON. Last week, while William Forbes, a resident at Pan- More village, was discharging a gun at some wild pigeons, it burst, and lacerated one of his hands in a shocking manner. The accident occasioned a morti fication, which was followed by a locked jaw, and the unfortunate man died on Sunday se'nnight. DIAL% At Hampstead, on Satur laving s e last at neon in hissu year, St Ilaipla Noel, Bart. who, e'male issue, is meeded In his dde by his nephew, sow flir John Milbank* ' But. . Monday last. in the Ind year of his ate . Sir James Graham, Ham M.P. for the Cky of Carlisle. On the 115th of holy last, en beard the J. W. P Hon. Comp se,angtfaaluKDahir of York. on his passage to China, CaL ra d Artillery at Fan St. George. in the 57th year of Ids age. Al A —TH IS DST. as& NIL 1 01 1 0 • 0 O 1 O 0 O 1 Dublin Waterford rimeramey sod Jong, trop Gotteobargh Mats WI Prance Hamburgb Handers Holland Leeward Islands Janata ,781 - 1,1 TO. •11. 111111 L O 0 O 1 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0" rG H• W ATER at LOll . Morning Afternoon - • _OGIL S 4 abates after 4 53 Wastes atter 4 . LOSION s fit SUIL9PFKII Na 1. Ittienags, rayrte. Dap r aiMI •Illi wri au Job An T., em Pri Pg% Pal be thi 04 be . 41• MI a .it • & of a di