Star. — London, England, 1805-02-25 00:00:00

LAW INTELLTGENCE. IN CONTINUATION IRON TN' raiciDlNG TAOS. COURT OF KING'S lilNlll, DUBLIN, JAN. THS KING V. MR. JVSTICR JoHMIIOM. (Cx.e'udrd from our Paper of Tharlday lf•J Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in reply, argtieti that the cafe before the Court was to be confidered like any common cafe, without reference to the particular mil - demeanor of the perfun who Rood accufed, or the particular defcription of eetfon accufed. In order to try the AA, every ptillible -cafe may be fuppofed, atd applied as tens to alcertain it, meaning. It might be fuppofed the cafe of an innocent man, falfely ac eukd, andlabonring under opprellion.• or it might be conceived the cafe of a flagrant mal efaaor, dread ing punithaseat, and 'kinking from trial. Mr. Jul: tice Johnfon, it appeared, was indißed for a libel in the King's Bench of England, and a warrant, figned by the Chief Juftiee, Axed for his apprchenfion.— Mc date of that warrant appears to be the 24th of November, 1804; why the warrant remained unex ecuted from November to January, was not need fary to Rate; but, in reply to Come obfervations, ex prefred, probably, with more ha; Ihnefs than had been intended, he would Rate, that on the Tuefday before execution of the warrant it was diflially intimated to Mr. Jake Johnfon, that unlefs he would fign a paper, undertaking to appear and plead to the india• silent which had been found, it would be necelTary to enforce the warrant againß him ; but that if he would undertake to appear a plead within the fiat eight days of the then enfEng term, that the war rant fbould be withdrawn. Mr. Juftice Johnfon re plied, that his Counfel were out of town, and that on their return he would confult them ; but gave no other anfwer. No reply came on Wcdtrefday—none on Thurfday ; and therefore, late on that day, the warrant having teen previoufly indurfed, two Magif t.. it;, went to his houfe at Milltown, informing him that thee had a warrant to urea him, and alio a pa per, which, if he figned, undertaking to appear and plead, the warrant wculd nut be executed. Having declined to fign it, be was then informed by the Ma gi.lraie, that be bad direr tions to execute it, tithe' on that evening or the following morning, at any hour ninft convenient to him ; and of courfe the alterna- the being given, though be refuted to lip the pa per, the warrant was not then executed. The Ml gittrate, upon his return to town, was diteded to write to Mr. Juttice Johnfon, that he would be waited upon at one o'clock the next day. It was forefeen that he might apply for a Habeas Corpus, but not until &only before the execution of the warrant; and accordingly copies of the neeeffary documents were prepared to be furnithed to him on his arrival in town ; but be required them on the (pot, and they were copied accordingly. This occafioned Tome de lay. and mull appeal...to every one to have been alto gether unneeeffary. To avoid the inconvenience of taking h;rn out of hls own room, a feconi Magiftrate was prefent at the time of the arreft, who ofered to bail him on the fpot, or to ditebarge him on his own recognizance ; but refuting thorn terms, he was brought to town, and was offered to be lodged in the houfe of the Jutlice of Peace who apprehended him, or in any other houfe in Dublin which he mould fi led, and accordingly he was taken, by his own dcfire, t'. a houfe in Harcouttlreet. He then fent a mef fage to the Attorney General, requelling rermiffion to return to Milltown, in the county of Dublin, and Elating that it would require time days to prepare the neceirary affidavits fir obtaining a writ of Habeas Corpus. The Attorney General returned for an (wet, that it was beyond his authority to fend him bask ro Milli .wn, and as term was approaching very near, and that a little further delay woili have the ailed r f rtiponing the prifoner's trial, Mr. Attorney G • ral &Sued the Magittrate to tell him that there wa. saity to detain him in town, and that he n.n - • hunt - elf on his palfage to England.— '1 a .ad the ha:ended effect : Mr. Juilice Johnfon wen., s• ith the Magiltrate in whole cuflody he was, t the houfe of the Chief Jaillice, who immediately figned the fest ana then* fignified to tl.e Attorney t.,entaal that he bad done fo, Lut that there might be frame delay in preparing and fealing the writ. The Attotney General therefore inflantly contented that, upon Mr. Jullice Johnfon undertaking to fue out she writ, and to have it ferved that evening, that he fhould be difcharged ; he accordingly was difcharg ed, the wt it was afterwatds delivered, and at the ap pointed hour the next day the Magill: ate was prepar• ed with the return to it. When charges of oppreffion had been made it. courfe of argument, Mt. Attor ney General tattled he would be excufed for having recited' a few fails in his own vindication. _ He with- ed to take the firft occafion of meeting and refuting the allegation, and diffiadly to diking% for himfelf and others the moft remote idea of any proceeding towards Mr. jullice johnfon, which the neceffitry at tainment of juftice did not indifpenfably require. Having thus defcribed the arreft, Mr. Attort_y Ge. literal called the attention of the Court to the motion for difchatge : The All on which the party was ar refted, ands, in the 4th fe&ion, That if any per fon or perfons, again!' whom a warrant (hall be it fued by any of the Judges of his Majefty's Court of King's Bench, &c. for any crime or againft the laws of England or Scotland refpete g ly, mall eG cape, gn into, refile, or be in any place of that part of the United Kingdom, called Ireland, it (hall be lawful to :weft him," &c. &c. itefe words were fo plain and obvious, and there was fo little difficulty in that part of the Al, the operative part upon which the warrant was grounded, that he might be juftified in alking what quantum of ingenuity, who: portion of learning was neceffary to make plain words intel ligible> For that being once found, there would then be afccrtained the portion of intelled ueceffary to en title Mr. juflice Johnfon to his difcharge. The . . words he had recited were not pretendceto be of ambiguous import ; but to mire a doubt upon them, the preamble of that, and all the they fic tions were to be fearched. to incteafe the con u i n, recourk• was to he had to the title 01 the Aft, with an auxiliary wthe.artiof before, namely, the marginal altridgment of the compilers of the AB, 'who, in abridging a elaufe, are fuppefed to be making the .4fift of Parliament. Recourfe was to he had to all odder (lactates upon the fame fubjea in England, not to ltrengthen our aft, but to artive at this happy conclufion, that by this mighty" 'Aft meat, the legiflature intended little or nothing. The Court was, however, to adhere to the old rules OI confirudion; they were to oppofe the evil and the re medy to each other, and if the words of the aft were found to embrace the whole of the fubjeft, they would not carry the low into effect if they diminifh ed of thole words their full operation. The first oh jedion of the Prifoner's Counfel was, that the legif latureintended to have cohfined the II to capital tali:, and not tb have extended it to mifdemeanots, but this ohjeflion is done away by looking to the Date of the low previous to the aft under confederation.— The King, by his prerogative, might have removed from one part of his dominions to the other, all per- Cons charged with capital offences, in order to abide their trial. The truth of this porition was known to every man at all converfant with the criminal pro ceedings in the two countries, and further founded upon the authority of the Englifh Habeas Corpus Ad. This aft was conceived in great jealoufy at the conclufion of the reign of Charles 11. and Ilion. ty before the acceffion of James. The Irith Habeas Corpus Ad, having been enafted in the reign of his prefent Majefly, it was not thought necelary to en tertain the fame jealoufy of the Houfe of Itnentwieh as of the Houfe of Stuart, and therefore the Iri(h ad did not contain the prohibitory claufe of the Englith aiff, nor the provifo reftraining it. It left the Lim as it found it with regard to the prerogative of the Crown. To fupport the limited conttrultion pro pofed on the part of the Defendant, it is contended, Paid Mr. Attorney General, that the words "felons and other malefa&ors," do not embrace minor of fenders, and that the word tnalefador is not appli• cable to a man who has not committed one of the greater crimes. In my judgment it extends to offen den df all defciiptious. My conftrudion of the word Malefactor does not needfully deny that a ma lefaCtor may be a man oho ought to be hanged, but their conllrudion goes to deny that he is a man, the meafure of whole guilt may be fatisfied by the char ofement of whipping. They fuppofe that a malefaftor mull be ripe for execution ; I fuppofe he may be alto man guilty of an inferior crime, and who may be ftopt in his career of vice, by timely andfalutary punifhment. The first obfervation natut ally occurring was, that when the words " Felons and other bfalefaetors," were ufed, they nosh mean " Malefatiors"—" other" than Felons. If the word applied only to fupetior crimes, it might be laid down as a general role, that though there might be felonies not capital, there are no capital offences not a felony, t Hawk. 99. That the word felon extends to cafes not capital is maid. fell. Petty larceny is not capital, yet it is a felony. Then who would fuppofe that the Legiflature laid hands on the petty pilferer, and yet permitted the malignant flanderer to range unmolefted. The word malefallor fignifies an evil-doer literally. Taken in the common acceptation of the Engliffi language, it is an offender againft the law—ride, johnfree Dic tionary: by the way, this work is no indifferent re• pertory of Bella Lettret, and has been rectified to with great fuccefs by thole who conceive the Poets to be the heft commentators upon an Aa of MIA. meat. But look to the word as ufed in our antient Statutes. The Stat. De MalefaBorilta in parvir, ap plies to folperior offenders, and obferving upon the Stat. 34 Edward 3. Sir M. Hale (peaks of malefac tors being bound by Juftices of the Peace to their good behaviour, and therefore the word, by decided authority, defcribes inferior offences. In proof that the words of the Ad of laf &Mon could admit of no other conkultion than that maintained on the part of the Crown. Mr. Attorney General put it in this manner: " Suppofe I fhould be called upon to prepare the draft of an Ad of Parliament to d) away the doubt, I should begin—" Whereas tome perfons of lingrilar lagacity in the laws of Ireland, have -onfiderable difficulty in underftanding the words " Felons or other Malchidors," be it, there fore declared and enacted that there words than he held and confirued to extend to all perfons guilty of any crime or cJnce again( the laws of England and Ireland refpedively. '—This certainly would not be ;gnotmo per ignotime, for it would be explaining the Ad, by ufing the very words to be found in the Sta tute fought to be explained. I know of no fpecies of crime or offence that the words do not include.— You are not to torture the plain meaning of the words in order to render the Aft inoperative. You are not to call about for a hook to hang a remnant of the law upon; you arc not to Drip it of its legiti mate energy and force, and then expofe, the ineffettive Ikeleton in mockery of the Legiflature. It has been preffed that a criminal for a Leifer crime is not to be removed in a manner fo inconvenient to him, but yet it is admitted that a perfon guilty of petty lar ceny to the amount of twelvepence falls within the Ad as a felon.—Does he who, with malice pro penfe, inflicts the vengeance of the fword, meeting his adverfiry in the dark and (hiking him unfeen; does he who fends his .poifon into other countries, whether for the body or the miad, whether by ark. nic or libel ; does he who writes from the malice of his heart, or who lives upon the reputation of others when he can no longer fubfift upon his own, does be feet to be compared with every common pilferer, and to profit by the companion Suppofe a man fent pills under pretence of adminitlering to the health of another in England, but in reality to poifon him, and the party dies ; is filch an offender to (Ay that he was not in England at the time of the offence being committed ; (hall he be permitted to fay that he *as not within the Aft of Parliament becaufe he did not efrape from England ? If the Ad receive that con !fruition, the pifoner elcapec, the libeller efcapes, all that train of crimes which debafe thetleart,ond thew the cowardice of the criminal, becaule committed in fuppnfed fecurity, will be relieved from the ope ration of an Aft profeffing to apply to all offenders. Is not this a cafe of fuch enormity as comes with in the provifions and words of the ad. fo as to enable the Law to grafp the offenders, and will you, my Lord, Dand between the law and its legitimate ope rations But the feelings of the Court have been addref fed on this occafion, and, through the Court, fore thing has been Paid to the public. • Bin I entreat you not to let every criminal embody himfelf with the liberty of the people ; and fuppofe there can be no freedom. in the lipd, but while it is an afylum for Malsfadors. I like to hear fine fentiments thanted from the Dock—but, my Lord, the liberty of the tithjed is to be preferved by other hands, and he who attempts to fupport it, by defeating the law, will find himfelf miferably mistaken. But I cannot pats over the language which has been tired, of " Confti tutional Law and Constitutional Judges." How I love to hen Judge paling over the law to gratis at the Conflitution'; mounting the liberty of the tubjeft•' to ride away from an Adak' Parliament. This Court will not exhibit fuch a pitture. For my part I do not underfiand the diainflion in a Court of Law. I confider the laws as embodied in the conflitution, and I do not feel that they can have any feparate exig ence. If you cannot get out of the Atft by legal conaruftion, look :tot to the Conflitution to help you out of the difficulty. He who is mutt obedient to the Law is moil faithful to the Conflitution. Conftrue this aft fo as to forward the remedy. and reprefs the mifchief, and yOu may defpife the veil s and idl e at tempts of any criminal to excite a public feeling in his favour, whore only pledge to the Conflitution will be his refillance to the Law. I have pointed out feve ral clalfes of offenders, who would cfcape punithment. if the words " or be" are (truck out of the Att, and the meaning of the Legiflature confined to the words " ej;-ape ane go into."—But inafmuch as a no table difcovery was made by the Defendants' Court fel, permitting the entire four words to remain, it may be necelfary to obferve a little-upon this con firuaion. It teems that a word or two becomes ne ceflary to be introduced for this purpore, and will have the effea of making very great jargon of that 'vbich was very good fettle. The expolittoo is this— the four words are to remain ; but then they are to be feparated, and the two fill are to be applied to thefoo fax, and thetwo lath to (Imp:lce: thus at the expence of a little law, a little grammar, and a little good-fenfe, the perfon to be apprehended is the perfon who efcates orgoes into, and the place where he is to be apprehend, ed, is the place in •eitich he (hall type or k. 0 fa pient and fagacious Legiflature ! with what wifilrms haft thou provided. that a man !hall not be taken where he is not to be found. With what timely pro vidence halt th of pointed out to the Conttable the precife line of his duty ? You 6rR deferibe the offen der and then you provide that he (hall never be ar relied but in the place where he (hall be. The perfon who efcspes from England, and goes into Ireland, is the perfou witl.;n the Aft. But what do the words rflide or be" mean? 0 ! they have nothing to do with the perfon; they only guard again& the indifere tion of the Conulable who might, otherwife, arrclt a man in one county, while he was innocently employ ed in another."—There may he good fenfe in this ar gument, but I flail leave it to be difcovered by others, protelling that to my humble judgment. it is a Con ltruetion which paffeth all underftanding. In refuta tion of the polition that the entraing part of the Sta tute was to be co:tooled by the Preamble, Mr. At torney General quoted Judge Buller when giving the opinion of the Twelve Judges of England. The cafe arofe out of the 9th of Geo. I. c. 22. fir fending threatening letters, and the Judges decided again the Preamble. To the argument, that the statute was profpeetive as to crime, and could not attach where the guilt was complete before the IR of Auguft laft, Mr. Attorney General laid, that there was no new crime created by the Ad, it only gives a new mode of apprehending an old offender : But was every new procefs for bringing a delinquent to be called an expo, AS? Law? As Well might be a Conflable newly created be called an " ex Hi faao" Conflable. The appellation could properly be given only to a Law which, after the fad done, made that criminal which was innocent before ; the diftinflion was too plain to be miftrolerflood although it might be palled over or mifreprefented. Mr. Attorney General now came to the lad obje&ion of the prifoner's Counfel, drawn from the words " Whereby their og-nces remain un punifhed, &c." It was argued on the fide of the De fendant, that he m; ht be tried in Ireland for the libel charged again& him. Mr. Attorney General contended that no foch argument could have force ; the King'speace was diliinCt in England and in Ireland, and a man could not be tried in the one place for an offence againfl the laws of the other; and upon this point theUniun made no alteration, the almini aration of jullice being diftind in both Minds, and conviaion in the one could not be pleaded in bar to an indiftment in the ether. But fuppoling the offence triable in either country, did it follow that the criminal was to chufe his own Judge? Becaufe he refuted to be tried where the accufation is made, mutt juflice fub rnifilvely wait upon him where the may not have the fame means of vindicating hcriclf? But, my Lord, Paid Mr. Attorney General, to come to olain and manly language, if the author be in this land, let him come forward ; let him raife• his head and be teen, and I will throw myfelf upon the juflice of an Is Mt Jury and an Irifh Bench.—l will not shrink front the trial of fuch a que(tion in my own country. Who is he that ufes theft arguments ? He is fuppofed to be an Irifhman, and ref ident in this country. If In, he knew the falfehood of his calumny, at the moment he was accufing a Member of this High Court (which I have the honour to addrefs) of tarnifhing his robes, and polluting his ermine, which had been cutrufted to him as a facred depodt. And he preferred this ac cufation, not before an Irish public, where the inte grity and charaEler of the learned Judge would have proteited him from the coarfe flander of his affail ant, but before the ttibunal of another country, where he could not have equal proteftion. This libeller, whoever he may be, dragged him to a diaant Court, without notice of trial, without procefs to bring in - his witneffes, without letting him fee the hand that held the accufation. Shall filch a man complain of being brought before the fame tribnnal to purge his abominations ? But let him avow himfelf, let him rest upon the merits of his publication, and I will try him at home. Yes my Lord, I feel ft would he di• vine retribution, that as he tried an !moat man where he was not known, he fhould be tried himfelf where be would not only have the charge of the ac cuter, but the whole weight of his own charaficr to contend with. I fhould be influenced by more than ordinary zeal for his conviction, if I willed liim to labour under more accumulated preffure. H;s cha rafter isnot unknown to the law. He mull be a man unchalle in his manners, embarraffed in his fortunes, and profligate in his principles. The language may be my own, but the deltription is pretty accurately taken from Lord Coke's report of the cafe De Liltellie fastrofi." After meeting at let ,ipth many other points of the oppofing argument, Zr. Attorney General proceeded—" If there are imperfections in ibis AEI of Parliament, they may be ratified ; and it will mortify the vanity of thofe who have been •fo loud in obferving upon the omiflion to provide hail, to tell them that the obfervation did not originate with them. I hope it may be remedied ; but certainly it cannot without coufideration. As to the empty de-, damation about the repeal of the Habcoc err:tr.: Aft, it is idle and prepofterous. Every an makes an arrell lawful, which was nut fo be(, as well be called a repeal of the Habeas C'tr i ‘rs Aft. It nrver was the intention of ttiat Aft to dir charge a i. 'don who was lawfolly arrested, and the liberty of the fubjeft does not depend upon freedom from arreft, but in having the cafes clearly and di/ tinftly defined, in which he may be liable t. it. The Defendant is not in enftody under a Warrant of Com mitment: indicted for a crime in Eng'and, he will have the full benefit in that country of the Habeas Corpus Aft;--he is offcted the fame advantage here, but he difclaims the favcur ; and ..et, in his propels to an ENGLISH JUDGE and an Ewn1.1514 JURY, his dtnation is compared to that of an unfutunate Duke, who was hurried to Palk, and rxecteted at midnight ! It does not become Connie! for the Crown to anticipate his conviftion, and I trul the eloquence of his Ad- vocate has hurried him beyond his own view of t' fubje£l." After Conte further matter, the Attu 1! y Ceneral concluded hi, reply, syLiLli ably c:., quently embraced the entire of tile oppofite argq ment, in the following winds : '‘ It has been alledg ed, that animadvcrtion upon puhlic fubjefts is a pnb. lic right. Within certain bounds, I admit it. But no man is to make pubic difctiffion the pretence for petting forth private mllice and refcntment. The ho. nett feelings of individuals are not to be made the (port of every idle calumniator who fe::ks his own repofe in the affliCtions of others. If he diffeminates his poifon, he mull anfwer for the contequences, and may be allied, Who fithjefled the aftions of hone& and honourable men to fuel' a it ilvinal as thou art Who made thee a Ru'.et and a Judge over us ? Ceafe thy iniquitous incinifitit;n—judge not, left thou thouldit be judged.' The Banderer fhould be deli vered °vet to the punithnient he deflrves. Thus (hall you fatisfy the laws and preferve the conflitu. tion ; and, ening with an even and unlitaken hand, teach the body of die people this faltitary led , n, that •as the weakell man is flreatg when upheld by the law, fo the ftrongeft man is weak when lie prcfnmes to re lilt it." .On Thurfday, the 2S:11, the Court gave its opi, nion firiatim, and the judgment was, that the prifo ner's cafe came within the At of Parliament, and that therefore he wa , not entitled to be difcharged. The defendant having vbta:ned a writ of Habeas Corpus out of the Court of Exchequer, the cafe was re•argued there, and judgment given correfpondent with that of the King's Bench ; previous to which, the dircuffion occupied three days. From thence the cafe was carried, by the fame proccfs, into the Court of Common Pleas, and continued to the 14 day of term, when the Judges adjourned the declaration of their opinion to the firft day of next term, and the prifoner was admitted to bail in the Cow t of King's Bench. BIRTH', At Tern- °Meekin, county I ouch the Lady of the Rev. Arthur Ellis, of a fon and hell. In Grenville-ftrett, Dt.l;lin, the Right Hon. Lady Anne Mai adau,hter. Mn.s Shore, wife of John Shore, t:l4. Poitmater of Naran,of a fun and heir. In Rutland. ftreet Dubli 1 , the Lady of Lewis Morgan, EA3. d a fun and heir. MARRIED. On the sat init. at Stonehour,: Dteoliraire, John Davies, Efq. MajorAn the Montgomery Militia, to Allis Charlotte Butt, third dAighter of the late Peter Butt. Efq. • In Merrion-fireet, Dublin, the Rev. William ercry, to Mifs FAiv.. Gore, daughter of the tote Dr. W. Gore, Bifhop of Limerick. DIFI). At Bath, Mr:. Anne Hallett, C. c. Lady of John Halkett, Us. Governor of the Illatul of Tub,tge. KIGH WAWA LUNIDON PRT6II 2 . TO-MOARO W. Morning • • • • 2$ Aleut., aft to • Afternoon • • • 57 tniantee after to FOR ACCOUNT OF THE MANUFACTURERS, Exempt front the Auction Duty, agreeable to At of Porn:toes:. Tuuasaar, March 14, MERAC, SON and Co. will put up to PUBLIC SAUK. at their Warehoufes, No. 78, Qcen-ftrcrt. A Large Afftartment of BRITISH PIECE GOODS. Particular: will be given in "hoe, by M. L. MERAC, Juni.r. Broker. --- FOR BRUISES, SPRAINS, WM• MATISNIS, &c. &c. — DR .8 r RS'S OPO DEL DO C. C AUTION. —On the ootfide of the Wrapper na each bottle of the real MLcliclue, a Ramp is fixed, in which is engraved" F. Newbery, No. at ‘ St. Paul's," and over the Cork of the Bottle a Label is palled, with theft Words, " Dr. Stecrsk Opodeldoc,prepared by F. Vewhery." All thofc whisk are (ski without thde defignations are grufs Count:T-6.ns Public arc rcquefted to attend to this Caution, in conk quutce of at Impufitioo which hus been praail . d by certain lien. tiers of Medicine, who, under cover of a euiliniedoo in trade wick Mr. Newhery's Houft,li eve not ouly fold in London, hut by tra velling round the Country, have dill. minated through the Retail Dealers iu an parts of the kingdom large quantities of a In:lrian; preparation of this Opodeldoe; in the bills of llitedtions of which the Names of Dr. Steen, of Charing Craig, and Mr. Newberyonf Sr. Paul's ChuTch•yard, are made ufe of, in order the /sore cum plecly to deceive unwary Pure...accts. guiuiut Opodeldoc is prepared and nde by F. Newbtry and No. 45, St. Paul's, on the Cnich-way, a few doors from Cler,.ll.le,l,onlon, in Bottles, pric- a.. 6,1. each, duty included; and by thole Venders only in the Country wino offer the real Me dicine rude its appropriate Stamp. FUR COUGHS, COLDS, ASTII7I.IAS, eec. CHURCH'S COUGH DROPS. - _ n Prepared nrdy by Shaw And Edwards, Nu. 65. on the Foot-way. St. Paul's Cuureb-yard, Lon. on, w.io having purchafed the xeipts of Mrs. E. Church, ar.: alone aut lorized to prepare aad fell ail Mr Church's Medicines." - I 'HESE COUGH DROPS have cured more Coughs. and !athinas, the. 1, ft ten year,, tbArl McJirine ever publiffied, they invariab:y uerf,,rm a cure with per fizt tafety, and it: a much lhorter time than eau be credited but lay experience.. Cou, - ;lui and Colds, howevtr obra::at7 :r-1 kr,7, ftanding, fpccdily removed by g^ntle, but infe:l' , :,:wryiration ; thcy allay that convulfive excitement, called tlekErr ia the throat, which cooltant Itlmulus to coughing,and t.cahle the afflid..4l to r, b• Tattle freely. Althrnatic Perians have been cured hi this Medicine aft , r and Itruggling 7 or 14 yivi with un enemy that fr.inrat.e thi:attred futrocation. Witorfi. Mr. N 1-airworthy's cafe, of h.b.n , zer Chapel, Lincoln's lun-F•ielJs, whofc teitinway Is the eron,;:ti prout et its elhcacy ever u:iered to the public iu favour of any Medicine. Diforilors of the Breatt and I.unr, C.7.funiptiveAffedions, Obftrietilna In the Glands. and Cu:.. Phlegm, are with eafe and faf.ty removed—in fad, Nr all di!or..!( re of the Breaft and Lungs, no medicine ever crl.cnt evil to ixt..nfive a file, or more rut.hcapprobation. Price ooly 2p. per Bottle, or double the O intity for 3s. 9d. Obferre, none can poffibly be ge,nope.l:l:l..t.: the namc of Sh::sir and lidwardi, No. 66, st. CI:L.. ch-y engrzvcd on .cc Stamp, accompan) log car! , but te. Chilthain Ointment, price it lid CI; , C4 the worft Chtiblun< with 3 very kw 4..r.t, Slid by .1 po,ntman of t'Ae Proprittur, by Mt. Holborn, and Ly every Vender of Medicitic Uni:Ld hini,dcbm. LONDON: Primed and WI:113a by LF Vril. )(FN 1, (o. Can terbury-tee, Lambeth), at th e 6 TAR ()Pi ICE. N. 1. an ti. blifbcd alto at the ST At °flit T.tuwe 9 1 1