Star. — London, England, 1805-07-19 00:00:00

Ile late firm of Hill and R;ckerby, was among the unlnclq tradefmen had truile3 this Defendant. I'hi, Czntlentan fwear t., l is perfn, and all doulit which could be entertained by the molt fcep- t:c.il mind, would Fe utterly removed. krbert Milner he had done Lufinefs for Mr. Price, the PlaintifT, at dilTzrent times for fume years. Mr. Mitchell horght goods of Meffrs. Hill and Ric iterbt., and the wituefs introduced him to Mr. Price, aid lie had bought good* alfo of the witref , , who "r -.t with h;rn to look out gno,is at Mr. Price', w!dcli he boh:t;it to the amount t f 661. 25. id. Mr. GAltßnW.—" My cafe is coke wide cf all crtaion •m the value of the goods, t-r of the delivery Of •he articles ; the tingle quiltion is, who was the purcharer r' Th 2 wi!nefs proceeded to flee, " this was in the vear 17911. After Mr. Price's Cleik had fr. 1.1 Mr. Mir , i.-e winds, he went over the way ro Maiden. I .ne to Mr. Pike's lndgings, and drank a b .tole of wine ; while they were drinking their wire the goods were peeked up. Mr. Mitchell then went to the In tile. I (ht. v.iniefe, and bought rf him fume goods in hi , (En. he did fume butinefs for himfelf iode p,n Irmly of Mr. Price), and went away with them ; but the witnefs did not fee him again for three years. He had ken Mr. Mitchell once at Wolverhampton lime, and, he added, I have every reafon to believe that he is the perfon who botiplathe goods." Mr. Easton if the Defendant be in Court, I Ihnithl like very much that the witnels might fee him." Mr. GARROW...—" He i. in Court, and very clefir oils that the witnefs flu:ldd fee him. Let Mr. An drew `.l;tchell come in." The Defendant came in.-4 , There he it," laid Mr. G•irro.v. Mr.Esssi (to the witrefsl—" Look at him ;" which the witnels (rid, deadfafily, close by the wit box. Lord EctsraVROVISH.IS that the perfon? A. I believe he is. Q Are yon fare ?—A. Yes, pleafe your Lordfhip. TAre you lure that this is the perfon ? — A. Yes. ie witnefs then fated, he Went down from Lou den to Wolverhampton at the requeft of Mr. Price, the Plaintiff, and few him there ; but that he did riot lee him from the rear rig% to azor. He had not fcen him oftener than thrice in town. He then proved the addrels which Mr. Mitchell gave him when he bought the goods, and when Mr. Priv ra. quelled his addrefs. Crlfs-examined by .14. GARRnw.—The witnefs laid, Mr. Price knew nothing of this cuftomer of his, ex cept kenn his recommendation. He recommended Mr. Mitchell to Mr. Price, and he gave his addref; at Soma's Town. I did not know where he lived in the country—l knew nothing more of him than his bring in town once a fortnight or three weeks buy ing goods, and he paid fome cafh for them. Then (rowed a long account of the but - niers between Mr. Mitchell and Meff..s. Hill and Rickerby, and alto a Mr. Henry, with whim he dealt for goods as a ped lar, hut none of them knew his country refidence, (Illy that he came to town, and bought goods as a pedlar. The witnefs then Intl fight of Mitchell for five years, when he few him at Wolverhampton, to which place the witnefs went at the inflance of Mr. Price. He knew the Defendant there. Mr. Paling, one of the warchoufe men of Mr. Price, proved the goods in quellion were fold, and the addrefs of Mr. Mitchell given at Somer's Town by &fire of Mr. Price, but he could fay nothing to the identity of the Defendant. Mr. Rickerhy laid he was formerly in partnerfhip with Mr. Hill, who is a prifoncr in the Giltfpur-Ilreet Compter, at the fuit of Mr. Price, but now in Court. This gentleman went through the account between his houfe and Mr. Mitckell, whom they unified on his own account, and all( let him have lonic goods for a perfon of the name of Gowen, whom they ne ver fin.. The witnefs then proceeded to give an aC cc:tint of his going down to Wolverhampton at the :mien of Mr. Price—went to the Angel at Wolver amron, where the name Andrew Mitchell was writ ten over the cli.or. He went there in the morning at nine o'clock—Mr. Mitchell was not within. The ordinary was at one. the witnefs went out ; on his yeurn, lie law Mr. Mitchell in the Ilreet with a whip in Itk hand, and knew him immediately :—" I. am firmly pct ftraded he is the man (laid he), I may fwe:ir pofitively—l did not (peak to him—law him at the houfe afterwards." The witnefs then gave an account of his going lime time after he fold the goods to Mr. Mitchell, to Portfmouth Fair, in hopes of finding him, as he un e:erfl ood him to ekal much about Arundel, Ched •worth, and different parts of Suffer, and that he went often to Portfmouth ; but did not meet with him, nor fhould he have known where to find him, but for the information of Mr. Price, who aid, he had found him out by accident. Some letters in the hand writing of the Defendant were preduced, and Come of the witneffes believed they were the fame hand writing as the addrefs of Andrew Mi,eheil, Somer's Town. Thornar• I live in Somers' Town.• A perfon of tilt nenle of James Mitchell—(lt was charg ed that the D..iendant atrial - led the name of James his hrotlier) lodg,e•l at my harle in the year t 798 :—he 1C. 4 . , erl there ni.n: months." Q Have you leen the perfon who lodged at your haute today Yes. QCan you rim him out ?—.A. Yes, there he is— (poite':ng out another perfOrz who Pod in the Arne place the Defendant was in luben the ficil s jaw hire antlfwore 14 1.;;71 ; ho: the Defendant Win thee:fa:log flown in another part of the (..oiert). Crofs examined. by dlr. GARROW••••••Q, I have no doubt von are lure that is the man ?—A. I am lure. Q. Did you ever go down to Wolverhampton ? A. I t:id. •C). ?:—A. A twelvemonth ago. Q:lDid you fee him there ?—A. I did. Q . ,Where ?—A. At the Bar. • What !mute was it ?—A. At the fign of the • You went down on purpofe to fee him ?—A. I did: Q Are you ctitain that is the man whom you law at the bar cf that rublic hoefe ?—.A I am. Nit. Gassow.—" Touch the roan you mean who p. the Angel Jon, at Wolverhatr.ptrn." Witnefs—n This is the man ?' fouelting the per 6r. he had pointed-ant. QYnn are fore of him ?—T am. Did he wear powder ?—A. I did not take ar.y not i c Q . ... Was he a man ied man when he lodged at your home ?—A. I cannot fay ; he paffed as fuch. He had two c:1;1(fir en. Q . ...pne of his children died?—A . It did. (U/liat was the came of the Do&sr who atten ded him ?—A. That I cannot fay. (Then Andrew Mitchell, the Defendant, flood up.) Mr. GARROW.--.." I lhould not wonder if you (wore that is the man ?"—A. No, that is not at all like him. ...... Not like him !—You never faw that man be. fore ?—A. 1 do not know that I ever did. Q . ...Wh0 took you down to Wolverhampton ?—A. I went down by Mr. Price's direetion. QWho paid your expences ?. —A. Mr. Price. O Mr. Price told you that the man who lodged at your honfe, was the fame perfon at Wolverhamp- ton ?—A. No ; he aflced nu., if I knew the party who lodged there. Q_There was a perfon of the name of Molloy who ufed to come to your hoof.- ?—A. Yes. He was there, you City, for nine months toge• thel.7—A. He was not, but his family was. Lord ELLEN noanuc H.—He came backwards and forwards ?—A. Yes. . . Q . ._ You are quite lure of him ?—A. My Lord, I (houid be very forry to mittake ; but to the bett of my knt.wledge. [The perfon to whom this Witnefs pointed was a Mr. John Craig, a Witnefs in this caufe, and refident at Shrewlbury, only 23 years of age.] Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—This witnefs has made a profs blonder ; but it is (hocking to heir a confident (wearing to what is impoffible. Mr. ERSKINE." I think, my Lord, it is a duty I owe to the Court, not to attempt to proceed further in this caufe." _ _ Mr. GARROW.—" After what has paired, will his Lordlhip permit me to fay a few words as to the ebarafter and fituation of my client ?" The Clues. Jusrics.— ,, Speeches for charaSer are unknown to the law, and anomalies in practice, and I take this opportunity, info remarkable a cafe, which might call for any thing that could be admitted, to fay that Inch an irregularity never can be allowed. — Call the Plaintiff."— Maim/ . Nor:Ailed. YEAILi•LL V. DRIVIR3. The Plaintiff is a furveyor, the Defendants are nurfery men in the neighbourhood of London. This anion was brought for a compenfation for drawing certain plans of two Oates in Sae:, and one in the vicinity of Egham. Mr. CARLOW Paid, that the Plaintiff was one of the moll diliinguifhed artills in his profeffion, and that he had drawn plans in compliance with the or• ders of the Defendants, who were employed in mak ing extenfive surveys by Government, under the di retlion of J. Fordyce, Efq. Surveyor General of the Crown Lands. One cllate was called Panglean Farm, confilling of t,083A. tR. 39P. another Pay -2,441A. oR. 211). and a third, comprifing mere than double that extent, viz. 4,8c8A. For thefe draughts the Plaintiff had only charged three halfpence and two-pence per acre ; and yet this ma deft demand was not fatisfied. On the plans being produced, they were examined by Thomas Cubit, a Land Surveyor, who depofed to the exquifite (kill of this artift ; and laid, that for plans fo finely executed, three-pence per acre would Ifcarcely be an adequate remuneration. Mr. gRSKINE, in reply, Paid, that what the Plain tiff performed was merely copying the rough plan of the Defendants ; that he had nothing to do with the furvey itfelf; and fur this labour he fhould fhew an caplets agreement had been made, which had been fulfilled by the Defeudants. Mr. Edw. Driver was called, who faid, the Plain tiff was alone employed to draw a fair plan upon vellum. The furvey iffelf was a prolix operation ; it was performed by the theodolite, by chains, by taking the angles of every inclolure with mathema tical precifion, and by perambulating each field, dif tinguifhing the hedw s, ponds, gates, patio, and every minute particular. Mr. ERSKINE—" By one queffion, my Lord, I will finifh this caufe." (Z._, Was there any agreement wiab the Plaintiff re'pceting the terms on which he would prepare thefe plans ?"—A. "He afked two pence per acre; this propolal was objeaed to, and lie pofitively engaged to execute the plans.which have been exhibited at half that fum. I made a memorandum of the agree ment, which is now in Court." Lord ELLE NBOROUGH..-." Here is a pofitive agree ment, to which thete is no anfwer. It would be ex traordinary it the Plaintiff could fupport the charge made on the cufforn. Suppofing he were to prepare a map of Europe, and to charge in this way, what would be the magnitude of the expence ?"—The Plaintiff was nonfaited. JOHN BURNEY AND WILLIAM HUTCHINSON e. GEORGE SAUNDERS. The Plaintiffs were wine and (pink merchants, to whom Samuel Saunders, the brother of the Defen dant, on the dilfolution of their partnerlhip, aEted in the cacw:ity of an agent for doting their concerns. "this action was brought on a bond of I °col. givt.ii by the Defendant for the faithful difchalge of this duty by his brother. The SOLICITOR Gttraitai., for Mees. Burney and Hutchinfon, Paid, that he fhould prove a balance due from Samuel Saunders, the agent, to the amount of 4531. los. and he fhould produce the bond which rendered the Defendant liable for the default of his brother. The Defendant had put three pleas upon , the record : the fir ft was non fafiurn; the next, that he had not received the money ; and the third, that no money remained in his hands. Charles Anderfon -was called to prove the figna ture to the bond. He laid that he faw it figned the Defendant. On his crofs-examination by Mr. GARROW, he faid he did bufinefs for flationers, and that he was vulgarly called a hackney writer. He admitted that he was not fober when he faw it exe cuted, and that he had Paid he had not feen is exe cuted ; yet on mature Tact:lion, after the rewipt of the fubpcena to attend in this caufe, he remembered diflinflly, that he had feat the fignature of the De fendant affixed to it. They gave him cylinder glares of potent gin, and he was intoxicated, but not for three days, as was reprefented. Cylinder glaffes were long glades, but they did not drink on that oc cafion by the yard. Being preffed farther, he Paid, that he had repeatedly declared, that he was too drunk to go to the honk of the Defendant, and did not fee the inftrument executed, for he was ton much in liquor to fee at all. He bad, however, refleecd on the tranfaaion, and he was now convinced thefe repeated declarations were erroneous. The SOLICITOR GENIRAL faid, under thefe cir cumflances he 11.. d no objeflion to refer the whole af fair to a Gentleman at the Bar, to an Attorney, to a Merchant, or to any perfon that had acquired the charaaer of an Konen man. In the fequel, a verdia was taken for the Defen- dant, fubjea to a reference. RICHARD HASWELL V. WILLIAM THCMPSON. This was an aftion brought by a carpenter againfl the Proprietor of Tome houfes in Orange.ftreet, and in King-meet, Holborn. The amount claimed was 19s. being the part unpaid of the larger fum of SO. gs. Mr: ERSKINE Paid, that his client had done this work in the ordinary courfe of his trade, and that he underftood the fingular defence was to be, a charge for work done by tome other perfon in the Defen• dant's own }mules. Unlefs Mr. Thompfon could Phew that the Plaintiff defircd them to do this on his own account, it was impotlible that any fet off cn fuch a principle could be etlablifhed. Before the witneffes were called, Mr. GARROW, for the Defendant, propofed a refererce which, not withftanding the advice of his Contra, the Plaintiff ' and his Attorney pertinacioufly refilled. One cf the witneffes was then brought forward, and from the defeftive evidence, Mr. Et tkine was induced to urge upon the Plaintiff to accede to the . proonfal, which the Counfel on the other fide was then inclined to with draw. His Lordthip laid a few words, fignifying, thattit appeared to him a fit cafe to refer, bur the obftinacy of the party teemed infurmountable, and the caufe was again continued. At tall, a fingular difcnvcry was made, which terminated the affair. It appeared, that neither the Plaintiff, nor his attorney, undettlt.od the meaning or the term refertner, but when it was property explained, by the affitlance of Mr. Erfkine, they immediately concurred in what had been recommended. MATTHIAS V. ROULAND. This was an action againft the Plaintiff for the Elating of the military depot lately creed on nor fham Common, in Suffex, The Defendant was the contr.raor with the Ordnance Board, and had em• played the Plaintiff to (late the building. The Plain riff proved the work done, and that his charges, ex. cept in one inilance, were the ufual and reafonable charges of the trade. The Defendant in reply, infdled on a fpecial con- trait for a Gated price, and alfo contended that the work was badly done, and that part svas obliged to be relaid in cement ; but on examination of the wit. neffee, it teemed that this was owing to the form of the work which had not height enough for the fpan, by which the roof Welt' was too flat, and the wind forced the rain through the interflices of the flares. The Defendant not being able to eftablith a fpecial contract, the Plaintiff had a verdict for' 441. 2S. 7d. alfo the 4cl. paid into Court. AXE V. SIMPSON. _ This was an aaicon brought again% the Defendant, a common carrier, to recover the value of a parcel to be conveyed from Nottingham to London by the De fendant's coach, which had neither been fafely con veyed, nor kept fafe in the warehoufe. The Defen dant, however, obtained a verdict, he having affixed up a Rotice in his coach office, that he would not be accountable for goods 101 l or damaged above yl. va lue, unlefs paid for and entered as filch. The parcel in quettien was not entered at all ; and the Court held, that the Defendant was not liable, under the fpecial contrail he had made with the public. TAYLOR V. BURTnt4 _ This was an action brought by the Plaintiff, who is a Coal Merchant, to recover from the Defendant, an Anetioneer, and alfo a Dealer in Coals, the pro ceeds ariling from the fale of fume craft which the Plaintiff had entrufted to the Defendant to fell. It appeared that the Plaintiff had formerly cartied on Winds in eopartnerfhip with a perfon of the name of Wright. The diffulution of their connection, however, had been notified in the ufual manner, and the barges were delivered to the Defendant to be fold as the Plaintiff's individual property. It was contended for the Defendant, that it would have been rather unnatural for the Defendant to fop pole the barges in queftion to be the individual pro party of the Plaintiff, when he faw the name— ', Wright and Co." marked on each. The Ltd was, that the Defendant had b.en applied to by Wright for certain quantities of coals, vWI which he fur nilhed him, trolling to the proceeds of the barges in ' his poffeaion. Lord ELLsosolooc H fa;3, if the Defendant could fhew any authority from Taylor, from whom he had received the barges to difpnfe of, to give Wright cre dit on the faith of them, that would be a good de ' fence. This, however, the Defendant could not do, on which the Jury found for the Ilaintiff.—Damages 1171. The building called Wellmialler Market is to be demolithed, and on its kite will be ereeted a new Guildhall. The workmen began their operations lag week. What they have destroyed of the Market will not be regretted, but in digging below it they toil at the foundations of the antient Sanctuary at' , Weamintler, which the Antiquaiy may now fee for the laft time. A man lately fold his wife and child to a hind at Taxford, for five fbillings—the poor woman was taken to the place of file, as is ufual on loch occafions, with a halter round her neck. We have already ez• poled the ignorance and ablurclity of the notion that the halter legalizes the transfer ; all the parties are liable to punishment in the Ecclellatlical Court, and however convenient this fpccies of traffic may he, we hope means may be adopted to reprefs a practice fo injurious to the public morals. On Friday afternoon a woman who had been in the workhonfe, and on bad terms with her hufband, took leave of him, never intending to return to him again, expoled hcrfelf for fate in Smithfield Mar key, with a halter about her neck ; the was rutin furreund ed by a multitude of people, but there were no bidders. The conftables having orders to fupprets Inch isomer. ral (caws, drove her out of the Market, and the re turned home to her husband, who felt himfclf greatly difappointed on the c.ecation, hot to confute him the promifed to go so a country market, whet: &staves to meet with better thccrfs. Of a!l* elm remedies erlf offet;sl to for 1,1) , c porpore, the Vegera!)le Syrup, i -. ! „ Dr. Hatton Boole, bands • • genet al &teem-, being und.athtedly :he mod' rowel fill antiicoilswic extant. J. ,Latinate Scurvies, where !e.t water and the motl ar.pro;cd a t; tifcorbutics have long b..cn tak,t witb , ott effea, tlns Syrup has operated in the molt cife±iut! In thole diforders follswing inoculation. es ea when the patient has been afiliaed with 1 in obflinate Rheurnatitrns, this Syrup ha, lately b een adminiflered with the greveil fuccets. Aid as ri tlt of the Antifeorbutics now in praflice have m :rcury in their compolition, which, from con , irued ; qt . pairs the conftitution, by dell (ling the cau s or the domach, and ditrolving the rn.imen um of:he bloa j, it is obvious what preference is due to a medicine purely vegetable, which isnot only Fe fully inn• cent in its operation, but is found by expel fence to he m rs fubtile and efficacious, by pcietrating the mingtol vcffels, and removing ebitruClions ina:c.tilible to any !mercurial preparation whatever. P.wictthtrly 01 5 . ferve, that this Syrup is in TIN biACCS, Los 61 each, and fold by appointment of 1) ietor lions .s, at Mr. Eurt.r.x's, NI. 4, Cheapfide, ; Ib y nio , t Medicinal Venders in every :own in the UaitA dnm. _ forre Fot On wcnt but f had Sc verc they Ardi T 1 Lto:: , /IOW; Q.: 14 /:,n part Cr don!] A. .0 Q Azy.; I di,. at ti C,r, 1 BIRTHS. At Fairbalni,Thurfday fe'n , )ight, Airs. 1-latr.il•on, of On Smiclay morning, the lady of Colonel ltolierts, of Up a Crofter:or. ftrcet, of a fon. • MARRIED. On Wcdneftlay, at Lambeth Church, William Buck, El . + of Clapham Rife, to Mifs Singleton, of St. Thomas's, Southwark. On We:ll . l(4day, Mr. Charles Newhery, Mintiag-lane, to Mifs Archdall, cideft daughter or Richard Archdall, iaq \1 At Edinburgh, on Saturday ha, Captain AlexanJer t:ordun of the 95th regiment, cideft fon of James Gordon of Roil..:Lan P.!q. to Mifs Eliza Robinlon, fecoud daughter of George Ro. ilifan, of • Clerrsiit• b, W. S. At Tertple-ftrset, Dublin, B-n Twift, rfq. to Xlifr Mar? raughan, zd daughter of the late Godfrey Gret:.e V n.gbru, EN. DWI). In March Taft, at I.uriford Hall, St.Elitahe•h, Ja•naica, \lr. Ri. chard Ill•Qnhae,eldeft Niel* Pr N4.4,tiltac,lll,n.tier of St. 0„..:In-q. On Sunday motning, Miff Grace Garroway, third dangleer Of John Garroway, Erg. ot Kiii?hrlbridye. On Tnefday, in Berner's-fin:cc, George Richard•, Erg. in hia ',.2d year. On Tuefday evening !aft, at his honk in ELcl-fclar.-real, Wit. Liam Gilbert, Efq of Lower Tooting. Surrey, a 3 d r 9. The z ith init. after a few ! oura illuefs, and in tee 7241 year of her age, Mrs. Wood, of Co-k-facid. On the Lath init. in the tannin of life, Mr.. Hayes, wife of Ri• chard Hayes, jun. Efq. of l:ri•:ge-ltrett, !Dublin. WAT 13.14. 44:1" LUNDON &K 11) tY II) MOMROW. Mraidng • • •• 23 "klutz; after 7 • • • 56 mi lutes a•:<: 7 Afterne;n HAVING dedicatei myfcit the (Indy, al - .d !teen gratified by the molt cord/it:table pradize in that brands which I thonet [roper to facet. 1 troll that I hove not more att. employed my time than thole who, in the ertensv... held of the profeffion, are occa.Sonally immerfel is uncertainty, 7 , 3 4 anal always attain that fuccers which is acquired Iy concentrating the letelledtml power to one daft of diforders The difedes of DE3ILITY arc pectilisely Jiitreffing for they tiring with them a train of concomitant friaptorrs, air!, by a 11• pee Son of ail vital energy, eriftence hvornes evt!tterel... Whether they mire train the prevaler—c cf exam*, thtddinze tive habits of fchool boys, or the ind&venees , 7f maturity. thc-ro• quire the moft of dwius profeffiohal d ll ; hut by the Ignorance of uneducated men, the fymptems arc aggravated, anl tSe eeett. WPM is 4eftroyed. Asa MSP.Ss3EA or the ROYAL COLLVaget a!IRCEONS. 1 rotund my preter.finns on regniaritv of educatiow and poti:Oleg every privilege to pradtice, I feel tnykif entitled to that onnidmee with which I have hitherto been foil.,•rt.lly htr,ouret in the brit foliations of local w-altnes, early apnlicadoe wit prevent the csineity of a dehititated frame; but vivre the fat fern., from a court:l/116th of the unmaolinefi f the v'es which aided his misfortune, is fearful of the contempt ee ~,nfure 0: Lis family phyfiaan. and broods over his infirmity with =real coa emirnere It malt be fatisfsa,ry for him to he efured not only of capability of treatment but aro of the mo ft inviable fecreey. And its recent Venereal Comolairts it is poire.le to 7.rcomt Ono danger or diftrefb ; in the molt compllcatel ctfci it is tht acquire• mcnt of exclufive experience in this line to elect a fafe, cerair, and ft oedy re-eitzbllfliment. I offer the advantage. of this croeriwtee to thole of either fez vita are 28316 , ed with any kind of llfiiiiLlTY, of any fymptomi V iiNiikFAL INFECTION, and in all cafes the tcr Tenn• iteration are ttatexl on the tint interview. --.-.-- Pae.r.r.t: in the country arc expcded to ineorea Bask cot; ad ate rqucttc4 to fpocify their age awl manner of living. YLA.Iti IN BRIE. Member of the Royal College of Surgeo.la Lobito No sq. Aru:..lel-ftreet. Strand nen Triple 3tr CURIOUS AND INTERESTING. Thia day was put:tithed, price :is. In one volume odlavo, of near 3. - ) pages. with an ele!ant Portrait of the Author, a New Edition (with Additions) of A GUIDE TO HEALTH ; or, ADVICE to both SEXES in a variety of Complaint , : aplaining the molt Pimple and tfficacious remedies for thofe . . . cafes which are treated on under the following heads, viz, Abortion, Adclrefs to the fair Sex Incubus, or night mare Add -ors to Parents,&Guardians Irregularity about the turn orate Advice to nervous Patients Leprofy, Li: is wata, Air, .‘ppetite, Afthma Lownefs of fririts, Love liarr.r., woricn, Banifulnefs Maids of a wzakly conditution Bathing, obfervations on Man, Merls, Pirth, particulars relating to Memory, 1.4 or defeat of Body, unfavourable poiture of Mind, difeafes of Bawels„ Bubo, Mothers, tlitir duty ChioroPs, or Green Sickncfs Ne ries, weak Child hearing, Child birth, Voltene cotivegation,banaftil Chordee, Cancers, Clap, Cold tired., of Conftimption, Cr:noels:km Parents ant Guardians Cure for liervous difeafes -addr , :fs to Para:log, Daily exercifes Dejedion Deficiency of natural Strength Differen.:e he:ween Venereal fyinptoma and thole often ntiltaketi for nom Dip Ilion, Dreams Esc:rice Female complaint , , Fitts flannel, Flatulence or wind complaints Fluor tlbus, or whites Girls, Gonorrhoea, Gout Gouty fpafms in the Stomach Great fchools Heavy fuppers Merctlitar; difeafes. Heart bunt Hypceliondriac complain. tlylieric Imo:oder:cc evacuation Internal nuking By S. SOLOMON, M. D. Every porron, young and old, ibtitlei pinch:lce this hook there being Lamely any individual who Is not interetted in font , l''"" f it. In partievlar it is rectocimended to young men and boil: at an early attention to-the letter may ferve to guard fatal rock on which thou girds /rive fplit, nod be die loems at pt. fc.ving their bodies fro:n diltare, and alfta their foul:, their iratalb anti all tht it faculties from deftrudtier. Londou : Printed for the Author, and fold by H. D. Se nrtrgt Paternoficr.tow, and Mrs. Mathews, Strand; Dng'ale, Du! Baster, Edinburgh; tidy, Cork ; Mager. Pelfaa aosi all t L Bookfetlers and Pa in!err of Provincial Nen-fp:pm in the Vt.ita Kingdom, price gs. only, delivered free cf . cm rage. ar Pars+ liymdis Plitilifis, or cot: fumptiat Pregr. , :-T Qick direaup Rheum:lmm, Riding on I.urfebaak Riling early Se itrvy, Scrofula Sr.ppreffion of die menial Swoonings Symptoms of Pregnancy Tea, Temptraurc,Tintieiity Turn of We Ulcer? lb ou:throat V Curry, ricellive, do ferret Venereal ifeati • Virgins Voyages by fea, Vial irg Water, Weak,efs, Wird. Windy liquors, W. men's milk, Wunien Youth I.ONDON: ,a-cd and Publiffied by LEVEL KEN ; terbuty•place, Lambeth), at the STAR Omer, No. I. ( amt. Publithed alto at the STAR Orrlct, Teri /1*- 11.1,.