Star. — London, England, 1819-03-20 00:00:00

NI V IN. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEIDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, MARC!! 19. • The Loan C.lgiss Aerica, who acts as Speaker, being de- I Mined at the Candi held at Carlton House on the Ilecoider's Report, did not take his place on the Woolsack till nu re than half-past five o'clock. The Earl of iIAREWoop presented a Petition from Hali fax, in the county of Voris, against the continuance of the In solvent Debtors' Act. Mr. Booonrs, accompanied by several Members, brought np from the commons, in pursuance of their Lordships late requi sition, the Third sod Fourth Iteprrts from the Commissioners for the Drainage of B•gs in Ireland. A 'Messa3e was delivered by the same Members, importing that the House had granted penni..sion to DAlilt RICARDO, Esq. ono of its Members, to attend their Lordships' Committee on the Affairs of the Bank, ne should so thirk lit. Mr. Baocnrs brotight op the New Prov*:!euce Timber rill, front :he Commons, which was read the fast char; and also the Nassau Salt Exportation Dill. The Irish Importation of India Goods Pali was brought up afterwards by the same Ger.tleman, and read in like mam.-r. The Marquis of OILMOND presented a Petition fro:7l Sears dal Hundred, in the comity of Derby, against the imposition of any New Duties on Inland Coals. The Bishop of CIIICHEST ER presented a l'etitien the of St. Giles's in the Fields, against the cor.tinoauce of the Insolvent Delco.; Act. Lord KEN VON presented a Petition from the Paridi of 'Mary-la-bonne, in favour of the i'oor's Lat.vs . :Intendment Did. The Marqui, of DO W SSII I E gave :airier of his unemion ou Monday newt to present a Petition tro:n numerous Protes tants is Irelard, in favour of the Boman Catholic Claims. The 11Iutinv Bill was read ibe third time and passed ; and the Matins Mutiny Bid passed through a Committee of the whole Ilonae. On the motion of the Marquis of LANSDOWNE. the Committee on the Poor's f#ws' Amentln.eut Ell was postponed till Tuesday. A short farther proceeding, in the way of evidence, respecting Taaffe's Divorce Bill, took place ; and on , : witness was ,alunia ed, who stated.that he received the money awar4sed as damages, b:ihg f.4A00 and upwards, on accoanta of cots; &e. front the Agent of Lard William Fitzgerald, and which he said was du:y appropriated for the uses of Mr. Taatfe. The farther przetedings in this case were postponed till this day re'linight.—,tdjouraed till )lordly. lIOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. ll:art in•na, from the Bank, presented an account of the Be Incas ol Pubiie Money in the hands of the Bank on the Ist 1 - I 15th inst.—Ordered to lit on the table. Mr: Teel rag. from the Stamp Office, presented an account of the balances of public money in the hinds of the distributors of stamps on the Ist inst.—Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. LYTILETON postponed his motion for the Abolition of State Lotteries to Tuesday next. The Quarter Se,,ion Revision Bill went through a Commit tee. The Report was rec,:ived, and ordered to be taken into farther consideration next Friday. The Report of the Committee appointed to try the merits of the Petition against the return of Mr. H. Davis and Mr. Pro theroe, as Member, for Bristol, was brought up. It stated that the Committe: had found that Mr. Davis and Mr. Prothzeoe were duly elected, and :hat the Petition, and the opposition to It, were not frivolous or vexatious. Mr. M. A. T A YLOR presented a Petition from certain inha bitants of Durhant against the Equaliiatiou of the Coal Duties. Read, and ordered to lie on the table. Mr. GORE LANGTON presented a Petition from the In habitants of Bath, compleining of the frauds and mischiefs oc cssioned by Mock Auctions, and praying the Parliament srogid adopt sonar measure to prevent them. Mr. W AITHM A N confirmed the truth of the statements in the Petition, and hoped that the Honourable Secretary of the Treasury would now be prepared to state whether it was to be' expected that Ministers would bring forward in support any Bill for abolishing those nuisances, Mock Auctions. Mr. LUSHINGTON said, that the only Bill which bad been offered for the approbation of Ministers had been found objectionable. If a Bill was presented without these objections, it would be examined. quimpably approved. oer.L pre • e a cilium from toe InnamtantS of St. Mary, Newington, praying for an Equalization of the Coal Duties. Read, and ordered to lie on tto. t.w.. A Message from the Lords announced their Lordships' assent to several Bills, for which see Lords. • On the motion of Lord J. RUSSELL, a new Writ wax or dered to be issued for the election of a new Member for the Borough of Tavistock, in the room of Lord William Russell, Who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. At the request of Mr. WYNNE, Mr. Serjeant Coat's post poned his motion for the production of the minutes of the Not tingham Election Committee, from this day to Tuesday peat. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT presented the followieg Peti tions :=—From Leeds, against the renewal of the Insolvent Debtors' Act; from Barnsley, against the came; front Spald ing, praying for the revision of the Criminal Law; and from St. Ann's, Westminster, against the renewal of the Insolvent Debtors Act. Petitions were also presented from the Borough of Osweston, against any alteration in the Coal Duties; tu.su the same F:ace, against the renewal of the Insolvent natter,' Act ; from Exeter, for .the modification of the Insolvent Debtors' Act; and from NewpOrt, Shropshire, against any alteration in the Coal Duties. These Petitions were severally brought up, read, and ordered to lie on the table. ' Lord FOLKSTONE remarked, that a great deal of uneasi ness was felt generally throughout the Country as to the inten tion of Ministers with respect to the Coal Duties. lie hoped the Chancellor of the Exchequer would now state v. hither it Was the intention of Government to support any tiac:Aure for Equalizing the Duties on Coals? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEt.LUER said that it was really impossible for hint to make at y other declaretion on this subject, than that which be had already made, that he thought it would not Le expedient, or wise, or beneficial, to make any alteration in the Coal Duties. At the suggestion of Mr. BROUGHAM, Lord A. HAMI4 TOM postponed his notion roiativo to the Scots Burghs, fauna Tuesday next, to Thursday, the Ist of April. 'Mr. WAITHMAN presented a Petition from William Weaver, who Lad been prosecuted by the Excise-Commissioners for having sold a small quantity of Spanish Juice (a prohibited substance) to a dealer in Bottled Porter. It stated that the Petitioner had bought the Sp: wish Juice at the Office of a .Brewer, and that the purchase was the only fact that could he proved against him at the trial. In cot:Aviv:ice a compromise wasentered into, and although the total amount of the penal ties for which he was prosecuted w,:o .t-44,00e, it was agreed that the proceedings against him should be quashed on payment of sCeOO ; but as it turned out that lie could not pay that sum, his whole property was taken in exeeution, and himself cast iata prison. The Petitioner stated, that he had a wife said sev,;:n children.—The Petition was r..ad, ordered to lie on the table, and to be printed. Mr. WAITIIMAN then gave notice, that on Tuesday he would move for an Account of the Expenses incurred in the prosecution of the Petitioner. The Portugal Slave Trade Bill was brought up, and read a first time. NETIMILANDS ST.AVE 111:1DE. On the Grder of the Day being read for the third reading of the Netherlands Slat e Trade Bill, Mr..slAl'.ltYATexpressed li i nisch' hostile to some of the provisions of the Bill, particularly that for the appointment of Sierra Leone, as one of the sta tions for the Commissioners. Lord CASTLEREAGH said it was the decided orinion of the Admiralty and the Gove:ament, after mature deliberation, thAt Sierra Leone was the only point on the coast of :Africa, which could have been chosen for that purpose.—The Bill was then wad the third time al,l paned. It C":A I. Z.V.PJSZOOT.D. ..----- • do the motior. or Lord CASTLEREAGH, the Report of the Royal Household was taken into El:titer consideration, and the Amendments agreed to. Oa the motion that the Bill be engrossed, Lord FOLKSTONE said be objected to theclause, gianting 1.0,0001..10 the. Duke of Fork. As the clause Low stood, is stated that the sum was graatzdonshe same grounds as the like sum had been granted to' het Majesty. Now he .clearly recollected that the 10,000 i. had been granted to her late Majesty to defray the increased expenses to which her Majesty would be put in holding drawing rooms, and not for the care of his Majesty's person. It was obvious that no such reason existed for giving the same sum to the Duke of York. Then the question arose whe ther it should be given to his Royal Higl:ness the Duke of York or not ? It was well known that his Royal Highness would be exposed to little or no ad ditional expense by the care of his Majesty's perscrt. In fact, the only expense to which he would be sub, jetted, was lining four post horses once a week--a thing so trifling that he thought hii Royal Highness would hardly condescend to accept any remuneration for it. But he objected altogether to the care of h s Majesty's person being entrusted to any person tut resident on the spot. The great reason for giving the office of Custos to her late Majesty was her res dence at Windsor. He was therefore of opinion, that as there were two Royal Princesses now resident tt Windsor, either of them would be much more pro perly entrusted with the care of his Majesty's persoi than the Duke of York. He was resolved to take the sense of the House on this clause, and moved as an amendment that it be omitted. _ _ Mr. LYTTLETON expressed surprise that no a:- tention was paid to the objections just made to this clause by his Noble Friend. It was disgraceful that the House should be called upon to vote such sums on false pretences. It was a constitutional maxim that the Monarch should not appear before his sub jects unless graciously. He would put it to the House and the country to say, how far Ministers had attended to this maxim. They had brought every Member of the Royal Family before the llouse in the most odious and ungracious manner possible. He might say, without flattery, that the Duke of York was more dear to the country than any other Member of the Royal Family. Among the various sophistical reasons by which it had been attempted to support the grant of 10,000/. one was, that the dig nity of the office required it. He thought quite the contrary; and that taking such a suns was inconsis tent with the dignity of that important office. and threw a suspicion on it. The true reason for the grant ‘a as, that the Duke cf York was in ?mbarrassed circumstances. That. was notorious. And it certainly would have been much better for Ministers to have come down to the House and stated truly and fairly the state of his Royal Highness's atfairs, and the necessity of making some grant to relieve him. In that case the House might have added a ccndition to the grant, which would have secured its proper application. Sooner or later the House must be called upon for a grant to relieve his Royal High ness. When that was done, he would put it to the House, whether his Royal Highness would not, after receiving this 10,0001. come to them for a further grant, with a very bad grace. He hoped his Royal Highness would see the impropriety of confounding his interest with his honour. It was also to be consi dered that there were large accumulations of the Privy Purse, in which the Duke of York was more interested than any other person. He expressed his disapprobation of the strain of pathos in which it had been attempted to discuss this subject. though it wa3 woll known that his Majesty was no mos ciimettie Ted in it than if he had been .feat 20 yoars ago. Mr. PROTHEROE was aware of the delicacy of this subject, but could not refrain from saying alew words upon it. Ministers seemed to have impressed' his Royal Highness's mind with very wrong notions as to the constitutional nature of this question and the affluence of the country. All the opinions which he had on a former occasion expressed on this sub. jcct, remained unaltered. The House divided—For the motion 156—For I.or d Folkestone's Amendment 97—Majority 59. On our return to the Gallery, we found Mr. C. WYNNE objecting to the recital of the Bill. He hoped some alteratidn would be made in it at the third reading. Lord CASTLEREAGH said, he thought the re cital unobjectionable. The reason of the grant of the 10,0001. to the Duke of York was exactly the same as that for granting it to her late Majesty—namely, the increased expenses to which he would be liable from the duties of the office of Custos.—The:Bill was then ordered to be read a third time on Monday. GAME LAWS. On the motion for the second reading of the Game Laws Amendment Bill, A NEW MEMBER rose to oppose it. He said that Game on the Continent was a marketable commo dity ; but this plan he learnt had diminished the Game, and rendered that kind cf property of little or no value. The present Bill, in some instances, was commendable; but he thought it would rather aggravate the evil than produce a remedy. Sir JOHN SHELLY hoped that the House in this instance would legislate practically, not theoretically. The present Bill was of the latter description, and the practice of legislating on theoretical principles ' . for practical purposes, he totally disapproved of. From the most mature deliberation, he found him self imperatively called upon to oppose the Bill. Al though all the eloquence might be on the other side, (Opposition), yet lie flattered himself that all the ar gument would be found on his side. The Bill pro fessed to detect and prevent noazhers; in his opinion it would tend to increase rather than diminish them. The poacher would find a new stimulus to his nefa rious pursuits by the provisions of this Bill, and whenever he got possession of game he would know much easier how to get rid of it. To protect Game by the provisions of this Bill would be found in many instances impossible, especially where there was pro perty to the amount of four or five thousand acres. Another objection he had to the Bill was the absur dity of holding out to the small landed proprietors that they might breed Game for the public market. ' This proposition was fallacious on the face of it.— Among many objections, there was in his opinion an insuperable one, the difficulty arising in the punish mein of poachers. The Honourable Baronet also objected to the penalty of £.5, or three months' im prisonment, which bordered on an incongruity. rom every consideration of the bad effects of this Bill, he should move as an amendment that this Bill be read this day six months. sir J. STEWART seconded the Motion; and eon• demned the principle and the tendency of the Bill. Mr. WILBERFORCE. although no sportsman, yet no man valued more thit he did the go o d o f so. ciety and the insprovement of the morals of the peo ple. Judging of the operations of the proposed lap in a moral point of view, it met with his hearty con' currence. He denied that the quantity of Game would be diminished by the enactment of the pro posed law. Proper reeulations might be introduced,' so as to render the Bill less objectionable to those , Gentlemen who thought its operations would be in jurious. From the most serious consideration of all the Acts which had been sanctioned by Parliament, he was persuaded that the Game Laws of this coun try were highly oppressive and tyrannical to the in-1 terest and happiness of mankind. It would there-, fore.be consolatory to the House to endeavour to make some compensation to society for the lung in fliction of these obnoxious Acts, by the introduction of the proposed law on their Statute Book. Gentle men ought to survey its operations in the serions as pect which he recommended, that for the improve ment of public morals. From .the best infoimation which he could collect, poaching had been the com mencement of a career of crimes. By gradations, many of those unhappy offenders had advanced ra pidly from being a poacher till ultimately he was led to the gallows. Did it not therefore become them to support a measure which had for its principle the prevention of poaching and the diminution of crime? In his inspection of the Laws, as they now stood, there appeared to him such an accumulation of cri minality,- and such a mass of criminals, as to call aloud for the immediate termination of the abomi nable Law. Let it therefore be endured no longer, but wiped off at once from our Statute Books, as disgraceful to our laws, and a stigma on the national character. If you wish to prevent any unfair traiEc in Game, give a licence for its sale, and iavest the power of granting licences to the Magistrates ; and hence you will instantly receive the aid of another set of active observers, who w iil become interested in the discovery and punishment of poachers. Gentle men would scarcely believe the vast extent to which dealers in Game now conducted their concerns— their dealings were truly immense, and in some in stances would stagger the belief of the most credu lous. He was astonished to hear that hundreds of sacks of game were brought weekly, nay, daily. to Town, by the mail-coaches and other conveyances, amounting in value and by sale to very large sums of money. The most part, if not the whole of this amazing traffic was cartied on by the plunder of poachers from Gentlemens' estates, now so anxious to oppose the salutary effects of this Bill, and conse quently to encourage the continuance of crime. By passing this Bill into a law, we will endeavour to stop, not to countenance, the continuance of crime, a change very desirable to every person actuated by. true philanthropy. He wished for no abridgemeat of the rights or happiness of mankind. The - landed proprietor had his enjoyments in thecountry, so had the monied men in town ; and he thought that neither class should be deprived of what constituted their comforts. The country gentleman had iris grati fications from town, and why should not the town resident have his gratifications in return also from the country? Pass the Bill, and grant a licence for the sale of Game, and you will promote among the Ilower orders a competition for honesty and laudable pursuits. The present question was of extreme im or.rtanco. It we stiffer t 1 present luwe any lunge?. temain in force, we would continue to chew hostile attitude to society—continue to se.nctlon acts of oppression. Let us therefore introduce a new and salutary system, and endeavour to prevent the pro gressive increase of moral evil. A New MEMBER followed, who stated that the present laws were certainly very inadequate; but .he did not think that the Bill now under discussion would remove the evils complained of. The Bill seemingly proposed that we should do away with all securities. This was a strange way of protecting property. In the protection of the duty on tea, it would have been curious to have proposed the cluing away with all securities. This would have been granting a licence to smugglers; a similar operation would take place by the enactment of this Bill, as it would afford a. licence to poachers. Mr. L. P. WELLESLEY supported this Bill, which, with some few amendments, would be salu tary to the public. The laws, as they now stood, were disgraceful to our statute books. What you cannot protect, at least in this instance, you ought to legalize. He approved of the principle of the Bill, and thought it would tend to remove many ob noxious Acts. Mr. COKE (of Norfolk) condemned the existing enactments relative to game. lie recollected that about 87 years ago, a law was introduced ►o take up persons who were found walking or prowling in an irregular manner on manorial lands. The law ap peared absurd at the time. Three lawyers of great eminence (Lord Kenyon, Mr. Dunning, and Mr. Lee), had said, that game should be considered as pri vate property, and therefore the common enactments . . - were adequate to the object. Ia this opinion he per fectly coincided. In Norfolk, the produce of plant ing and farming, in all parts of the county, private property had always been considered the same as property in game. Any man has as much right to that kind of property, without any fresh enactment, as to his property in the land itself. This right was indisputable, and therefore, required no elucidation. —(hear).—lie had heard a great deal said by Gen tlemen who owned preserves, about their interest and amusement. The Ilonourable Gentleman said, he did not consider himself as sent to Parliament for his own amusement and interest—(Cieering)—if so, he should most likely have gone to the other side of the .House ; he might have found his interest possi bly in sitting there—(Continteedcicers.)--lie had to look to other, to more important interests—to pro tect those whom he represented, from the operation of laws which were ar:Atrary, cruel, and tyrannical ; laws whleh were not to be endured—(Meal, " it is certainly no argument to say that I possess an immense quantity of frame, or thnt I am a greater preserver of game. fhe question is, what is the best law for the good of the community at large ?" (Ifear, hear.)—The Bill now proposed was a salutary amendment, and therefore should have his hearty concurrence and support. The present laws relative to game were altogether disgraceful ar.d inhuman in the extreme. Many instances of their abominable gyrations could be produced. It was only on the close of the last shooting eerier., in Norfolk,. that a poor old woman, in croLsiug a - Lender:rm% planta tioa, was cruelly sltot-most des-crattly mangled hear)—Her screams at length biouglot keeper up to her; and all the censoiaf on weoe could obtain for this violation of humanity .0- - ,the keeper telling her that she had only gOt ".kaded ;" whereas, had she gone a little furth o the plantation, she world certainly have bee r , rough the body and killed. Application w as rade to the Magistrate ; and who did the hi: ; ,: th t in rate prove to be? Why, the owns cf tl e s ; ; : -- , Hear;—The noire would ask, what tent: . he extend to her ? He gave her an s crder on th e rish for a weekly sum of s.! exclaimed the Honourable Member, " is this to be tr duced in a civilired and a Christian country? acts of outrage are cleteStable ; bat that tncy sho pass with impunity was a crying sin against their. nt of , justice and the dictates of humenitr:'—fe., chtering).--Ilie Honourable _Member concluded promising the Bill his warmest support. • A New 'anima said, •he gave his unecnle ee , aupport to this Bill. If game were to be nnet ticularized as private property, something more l , tine ought to be introduce! into the Bill. The ile rourable • Member indicated his readiness to eiz t • amended clause; but as this was not the proact sirs of the business, he would avail himself of the ,] portuniry in the progress of the Act. Mr. ISANKES, in reference to the 'story cf game-keeper, and the wounding of the poor woe ; in Norfolk, asked what had been discovered in:: present Bill which would prevent similar 'accident His Honourable Friend (Mr. WilberforCe) had L. he believed, read the Lill, otherwise he would In observed oranfincongruities in it. Gentlemen sal that by the continuance of the present laws would be an increased portion of human wise: Let them not come with large words in their nue. to frighten men from propriety. With all the ;7 tensions to objects of humanity which had been commended by this Bill, it was curses to find, I. two of the most rigid Acts on the St:tate-beck vi • 'el in it ; indeed it could mt. do we'.l rif,:. preserved it. Occupancy was the right to property, and w' e ever game appeared on the Lend occupied here the property of the individual in whose posses.. the land was. Some Gentlemen condemned t'.e fir •r tetaishing a man for killing a hare. r.;c certairly a trespar-a on private property, and fore ree i uired some penalty. N%ith all the comme dations of the present Bill, was a peacher in a Set: state' No. Lock at the Bill. It reminded Von the privilege assumed by an old man, who, or. right of private property, attempted to amuse hi e.:l* by a kind of monopelh. by tiring at all thebi at ()nee which had arisen from his small piece ground, when he killed one bird, and ail the thew away. This was in some measure emblem; cal of the new law, for the old laws were so has' up and garbled, that all the good things were tc' ted, or ?lew away from the new law. - His Hone able Friend behind him (Mr. IVilberforce) had fessed himself no sportsman; he was consenee. no pm:et:eel judoe of tte.operations et - the qn. that had moved him was the supposed preeerio: poachers. a system which was thought a nursery crimes. But the Bill tended to increase poach: for where yon now had one, you Would, by the fects of the new Pill, hare at least five Bes; ull that, gnrne would snob be destroyed; and a g• of vagabonds, poachers, he meant', would be loose upon the pablic, to the annoyance of evi landed proprietor in the kingdom. Out of Mt tenders, by the operations of the Act of last Sess 9; were liable to the severest penalties; so that law did not defend-the general condemnation wl some Geatlemen had been pleased to stigmati; with. The proposed Bill was anomalous iu its sent stare, and could not, in his opinion, be amended as to be 'rendered palatable. He shold therefore oppose it. Colonel WOOD was about to :Arra, that the • woman, whose case had been noticed by the nourable and humane Member for Norfolk, been wounded most ferociously by that detestate instrument called a spring-gun, but was corrected' Mr. COKE, who said it was not a spring gun. Colonel WOOD proceeded by observing, that Bill would operate as a protection against spri guns, the most unwarrantable and ferocious puni meat which could be Inflicted against any ()tient But he did not think that killing a bird ur a hare served the loss of a limb, far less the loss of life. the sale of game be legalized, and you do avee once with all poachers, and all spring-guns. necessary to supply this great town with game, you cannot do it so effectually a: by legalizing sale of it. No poacher ever goes out without ka ing first the market that he is to supply. If he not make this previous arrangement, game b , such a perishable commodity, he might as well maia at home, or turn his attention to some otlict ject of gain. Even were the present Bill to p; some few poachers might perhaps continue for a ' to commit their trespasses by stealth, in the manner as some vagrants steal geese or fowls. poulterers of London, a respectable set of men, the Colonel.) would rejoice to find that you had It lized the sale of game. Where are the supplies; duced from whkh serve to gratify town custom( From four preserves: for notwithstanding every e Lion, this kind of property eaanot be protected. argument had been sue-ted against the Bill, eh would remove a number of Gentlemen from I residences, because, by the destruction of the g: there would be no attraction. But there were Di sports mere congenial to many Gentlemen, than kh, ing game ; consequently, their residences is h'c country would not be abandoned. The Celoma purl ticularised fox hunting, which was in every respect more congenial to Gentlemen in general. Neer" of preserves frevently went beyond their ceenais sion, by poisoning foxes,ailthough they were a Sretie s of game piized by many of their masters. Formehlv• Gentlemen delighted in going out to the field wi.% their gun to kill game, but now the custom was to collect as many pheasants as possible together in preserves, like so many barn-door fowls. lie meter hid' been in France; but he 'was told, that in that cotuary, the practice was to surroand a certain ones of woodland, drive out the animals, and then .eich i takes his she: at him ea pessent,—x , y this they c 4 •' hunting! This mode difFered as much from Engli• 3 hunting, as French Gentlemen eiffered in their man ners from English Gentlemen. Ile :tepee: the Ere' posed law could pass rarliament. M-. FRANI:LAND LE \Vi.": was. cenvinre4 I 3 . u E aliie • ',it 21:d t. 1 • L: .r ope I , :ens t 1 i pertY. b et I. t he ;-• tr tend P,4! tr-- ;:ct, I ▪ vho 3 c. rclt th .reset recon to PI medi '2l' M 1 sti7e of cr , r of tlu be so rstr ia recei: I e jectic W3S I r. awak 117ut °pro said, 'ii o .ave 110— ordel e m tti 11 , into v am l it:: .7.2 b. 9 .rapt- lion, e .ices this ' Gras Sual ept• tXtr. ever the the or. tie t::ey and e birds ece tf the Le rt 'Ceti He led Ye! tc;re• prom.- see: d cere use tt !f fe: Ll. re he of 24/.1 Macs, :ad gts be le: sae eve:' r oi C, of. tit: :at :h.; He wh:ca atize it t:u is pre cu - be so at should 21, le root e ce k, bad Or estable :ted by nc ct lat sprit tc tc fend , :. tt l iLre t!-- to L• et .2 vay at It is e, and • ing the kay.r. he ea .ell 'tcr ct- ) pats. r r:* The is•s: d es ;re- >tr. e ? ▪ Cre7' Cre t''. 3 (...t : 7 ••• .1 , 1.! • Ir. 4:1 1,37' ✓SiCct :e e lr ,:ttratc- sreciet merlr• was to :her in trser n th.it mei each , rY :ngV 3 r e Err . •