Star. — London, England, 1824-10-20 00:00:00

~- LITERARY NOTICES. I. The Hermit in Edinbargh ; or, Sketches of Manner: , and red Characters and Scenes in the Drama of Lift. In three volumes, Ns. This work far exceeds the other Hermits of the day, inasmuch as real characters and actual scenes io the Scottish capital fill its pages. It is a common opinion that it is a continuation of former celebrated publica tions by the Modern Spectator, whilst it is positively as serted by some that the witty satirist starts here for the first time in the field of Criticism. Whoever he be, the work is a most amusing publication • its satire gliding on the swift wings of light wit and goo d humour, lashing without personality, and exciting mirth without malice. What adds greatly to the interest of the work, is its em bracing a lapse of 20 years up to the present day, and depicting all the diverting characters and scenes during. that period, the dramatis persons being not only the fixtures of the city, but the lighter and gayer birds of passage, who have visited the Scottish metropolis during that space of time. The King's visit to Scotland is a prominent and very capital feature in it. 11. Thi Beauties of Modern Literature, in Verse end Prose. To which uprefsced, a preliminary View of the Literature of the Age, by M. M , Danstor, Esq. Author Ta Critical Dissertation on Task. In onivolAvo. 14s. is work comprehends the spirit of English Litera ture throughout the year 1823 ; its contents, comprising a variety of interesting and very diversified subjects, g , from grave to gay, from lively to severe," accom panied with critical remarks by the Editor. As a par lour window and post-chaise companion, calculated to improve and expand the mind, it will be found most excellently well adapted. The preliminary essay, which extends through a hundred pages, is evidently the pro duction of a mind of very considerable talent and ac qtrirements, and fully illustrative of the writer's props sition, that there is no subject which a writer of genius takes up, on which he cannot exercise all the genius of which he is master. The remarks on composition, as well as on the literature of the age, are very pertinent and judicious. 111. Walley the Cardinal, and his Times, Courtly, Poli tical, and Ecclesiastical. By Grottot HOWARD, Esq. Author of Lady Jane Grey and her Times. Illustrated with a Portrait an¢ Autograph of Me Cardinal, and numerous Cuts, 16s. The subject of this volume is a memorable instance of the instability of human grandeur. Mr. Howard's object has been to com t rils such a life of Wolsey as should refer principally to personal biography, and to the_ peculiar customs and manners of the times. Under this -view of the'subject, the pomp and splen slour 1)1 the Cal dinars establishment; his insolence in prosperity, and his pusillanimity in adversity, as matters of historical interest, are well detailed, and furnish much curious information. Works of the kind before us (it is well observed in the last number of the Gentleman's Magazine) are excellently fined to supply the defects in history, where a leading personage may not have his proper share of distinction, and the result be much the same as spoiling a drama by curtailing the acts and speeches of the principal character. Another contem porary (the Critical Gazette) says, " Mr. Howard has depicted Wolsey exactly as we think he was. In the several stages of his progress, and onward to his decline, fall, and Jeath, the heart and mind of this singular man are figured to us in perhaps the best of all possible ways—in his demeanour and his actions." There is another particular also, in which this work has an essen tial value; namely, in reconciling some chronological discrepancies, arising from the different modes of nota tion used by the earlier annalists. Of the splendour of Wolsey's establishment, some idea will be formed, as well as of the state of the times, by the fact that his 4 cheine roll' comprised upwards of eight hundred persons, of all ranks, including nine or ten Peers, or sons of Peers, fifteen Knights, and forty Esquires ; but then it must be stated that these latter were not considered as domestics, but as friends who resided in his family, either for education and know ledge of the world, or for state purposes, merely adding to the shew on days of ceremony. Three boards were daily. spread in his hall, wherever he might be resident: at the head of the first sate a Priest, in the office of a Steward ; at the head of the second, a Knight, as Trea surer; and at the third, an Esquire, who was always Comptroller of the Household. The volume, altogether, possesses much interest. The autograph of EDWARD the Black Prince, which antiquaries have been in search of for many years, has at length been found on the Roll of the Artillery Com pany, where the names and hand-writing of some of the most illustrious patriots and heroes of early times are inscribed. Mr. Muss, the late celebrated enamel painter, left a large and beautiful copy of a Holy Family by Parme giano, which the Kum, through the kind agency, we believe, of Sir WILLIAM KNIGHTON, purchased of the artist's widow, at the price of 1,500 guineas. This money, we are informed, she placed in the house of MARSH and Co. fix the purpose of purchasing an Ex chequer Bill ; and as it is her principal property, and she has a young family, the failure of the firm must tutu rally give her great uneasiness. Dr. Mounsey lived so long in the office of physician to Chelsea Hospital,. that, during many changes of Administration, the reversion of the place had been promised to several medical friends of tl:e different Paymasters of the Forces. One day, the Doctor, look ing out of his window, saw a Gentleman attentively examining the house and gardens, who he knew had just got the reversion of the place; and coming out to him, he thus a:costed him : " Well, Sir, I see you are examining your house and gardens that are to be, and I assure you they are bath very pleasant and conve- Irian ; but I must tell you one circumstance—you are theft th man that - isas got the reversion of the place ; I have buried the other four ; and what is more," said the Doctor, looking archly at him, "there is something in your face that tells me I shall bury you too." How ever extraordinary, the fact turned out to be so; and at the time of the Doctor's death, there was no person • who had the promise of the place. The following epitaph is copied verbatim d literatim from a head-stone in Ulverston Church-yard s to the Memory of Thomas and Margaret Tyson; Greats not fee bus wlen we is Gon ewer that is mkt ewer sks 13 Mk when Como death aim We holm is rise and Ile that 116 that WIC dies . , • - • WEST ,- INDIA SLAVERY. azimut It. TO MR EDITOR OF THE STAR. Sr a—ln my last letter, I offered to the Public a brief analysis of the criticisms of Anot.us upon the Trinidad ,Order in Council, and I think conclusively demon strated that ANGLIA hid very little accurate informa tion with respect to the facts of the case upon which he is giving a judgment.. Leaving, however, to Anomie the task of reconciling to himself this endeavour to in fluence public opinion upon a question, concerning the real nature of which be was himself ignorant, I now propose to redeem the pledge which I hadgiven of ad verting to those other points which Arrows appears to have stated or reasoned upon erroneously. The article in the Quarterly Review has the appear ance.of being a defence of the measures which Govern ment have adopted upon this most delicate subject of West India Slavery, and containing a commentary upon the Order in Council and the probable effect of-its ope 'ration.: the article also examines, at some length, the tiuestion of the relative value of free and slave labour in the West Indies, and enforces the necessity of that part ~.f.the.ittbject being completely understood before any additional or more decisive measures than those already "adopted should be carried into effect by the Govern. ment. A writer in the British aid Colonial Weekly Re gister, adopting the same line of argument as AnoLus, observes—," We agree with the Reresver in considering that the question, whether free labour is more pi ofitable than that of Slaves? is the true debateable ground upon which the arguments of both parties, if we must so speak, the Abolitionists and the Planters, should encounter;" and ANOLUS does not appear ma terially to dissent from this proposition, though it is not perhaps stated with equal distinctness. This material point, then, being established, I must beg to refer my Readers to the remarks in that part of the article in the Quartetly Review, which relate to this compara tively new and untried question, and it w ill be time enough to enter upon the consideration of the remarks of ANGLIN upon the free labour question, in subse quent letters ; but, in the meanwhile, it is ienportant to observe, that the reasoners upon West India Slavery questions may be divided into three classes—the Ultra Abolitionists, who complain that Government have done little or nothing—the Ultra Colonists, who accuse Government of having done infinitely too much—and a third party, which may be said to comprise both the Go vernment and the House of Commons, who have steered a middle course. The Government having acted in obe. dience to the unanimous resolutions of the House of Commons, and the House of Commons, in passing those resolutions, having acted in obedience to the declared wishes of the country. ANGLIN; takes the field as an Ultra Abolitionist; and having thus detailed the nature of the parties, and of the contest between them, I now proceed in the examination of the reasonings and obser vations of ANGLUIL ANGLUS states, that the Reviewer has "given the sanction of his authority to the delusive statement that the Island of St. Vincerit had discontinued the practice of flogging women, and driving the negroes in the field." It is singular enough, that ANGLUS should have quarrelled at once with an argument on his own side. The Review states, that in some Colonies the discon tinuance of the stimulus of the whip in the field, and Of the punishment of the female Slaves under any circuma stances, by flogging, were protested against as mea sures incompatible with a state of slavery, and the necessary authority of the Masters over their Slaves --that in other Colonies those innovations did not appear to create any alarm, and then adds, that " in the Address of the Island of St. Vincent it is ob served that those practices had been virtually disconti nued, and the Government are reproached with their , ignorance of the fact." Where, then, is the sanction given by the Reviewer of this statement, whether de [wive or not delusive? With respect to the fact itself, Dot one word of confirmation is stated. It was evidently introduced in the Review, to shew that there were per sons in the %Vest Indies possessing Slaves, in whose opi nion the abandonment of the practices referred to was compatible with a state of Slavery, and with the autho. rity of the masters. ANGLUS does not perceive that thd argument was against those who protested against the measures of Government, which measures had directed' the omission of those practices; and Axotus does not perceive that whether the fact of the discontinuance of the whip in St. Vincent be confirmed or not, the argu ment of those who advanced it, was valid as to their own opinion, that the whip was not necessary. ANGLUS, in his Second Letter, says he agrees with the Reviewer, that the resistance of many of the West Indians to the measures now pursuing for the mitigation and extinction of Slavery, is produced more by a dread Aftheir loss of property, than by their abstract love of .blavery." Soon atterwards, however, he states: " tke 4pethesis of the Reviewer is, that the resistance of the West Indians to the proposed reforms of their system irises sokly from a dread of the loss of property :" and be then asks, " But is this borne out by facts r - If so," continues AtcoLus, 84 how happens it, that, as far as we knout, all the great West India Proprietors resident in this country, possessing, probably, seven-eighths of the Sugar Estates, should have concurred in Mr. Can rung's Resolutions?" The obvious answer to this ques tion is to be found in the Sd Resolution, proposed by Mr. Canning, and passed by the House of Commons, which promises and guarantees " a fair and equitable consideration of the interests of all parties concerned therein." Does it afford any reasonable ground of sur prise that the Colonists residing in England, whatever may be their proportion as Proprietors of Sugar Estates,' should rely on the good faith of the House of Corn mons, to afford them a fair and equitable compensation, should they really sustain loss by the measures taken to improve the condition of the Slaves? " But," continues A NOLUS, "the clamour raised against them (the Resolutions) has proceeded chiefly from mew of little or no property, many of whom are the salaried servants of these very proprietors ;' and he concludes by! observing, " it is evident, therefore, that in attributing' the resistance to reform to a dread of the loss of pris. Petty as its cause, the Reviewer takes but a very partial and inadequate view of the subject," &c. • If Amours means by men of no property persons who have no interest in the question, then it may be admitted that the interference of such persons is mis placed. But what is meant by the clamours of persons of small property ? If these are clamorous, it is because `hey fear injury ; dis the extent of a man's property constitute th easure of his claims to justice or pro. -•n? and not, why is the small proprietor less en • It is particabriy Wind to refer t 4 reader to the view taken of Ms branch of the subject, by the of QC the article in the iiicitth Mid* acArk titled than those more largely endowed, ills state fairly l and temperately his claims? Bet let me ask, are these clamorous individuals, who are Slays Proprietors, really of such .low relative importance, when compared with the proprietors of the soil resident in England ?—The question is, do they or do they not possess slaves to any considerable amount? We should infer, certainly not, from the manner in which MMus treats their cla mours. Let us then examine, as an instance, the pro portions in one of the principal West India Islands. In a Report of a Committee of the Council of Bar badoes, dated the 22d of July, 1823, it is stated, on the credit of an official Return from the Treasurer's Office, where every slave and every acre of land are annually given in, for the purpose of being taxed, that there are .5206 Owners of Slaves in that Island, that of this num ber 1535 are Owners of land, as well as of slaves, that the remaining 3671 Owners of Slaves have no land at all! Is ANcLus surprised that this latter class, these Owners of Slaves only, should feel something like an interest in a question which concerns their right of pro perty in Slaves being abridged ? Does he not think it possible that if those persons could be satisfied that the value of their property should not be in any degree de teriorated, or, if such deterioration did take place, that they should receive fall compensation, that they might not be so clamorous as they have been, or bate shewn their fears and .apprehensions in so infamous and un justifiable a manner as the demolition of the Methodist Chapel in that Colony ? lam not to be understood as ' arguing that the consideration of this peculiar class of persons should interfere with those general measures which affect the Proprietors of land as well as the Slaves—the case of that peculiar class may be made a special one: but I am endeavouring to sheer, in contradic tion to A NGLUS, that the dread of the loss of property may be considered as the most active cause of their re sistance, and their insubordination. Neither did the Reviewer ever assign this alarm as the sole cause of the resistance of the West Indians; he merely stated that which must he'obvions to the most superficial observer, that it is not the love of slavery, replete as it is with dangers to themselves, which cha racterises the proceedings or the sentiments of the West Indian) Colonists; but that it is the dread of the loss of property—an instinctive anxiety for the preservation of life—the fear of an experiment involving a radical change, which may lead to results not contemplated by its promoters, whose habitual modes of thinking, and means of information, however benevolent their interw tions, may not have rendered them competent to antici pate. The Colonists do not deny that Slavery is an evil.—No; but they assert that it is an evil, created not by themselves nor for their separate interests, but by the mother country; and for national purposes; and therefore, before they co-operate with this country in re tracing its steps, they would stipulate that they should not be made to pay the penalty of ruin for errors in which they had no participation, and for i which they ought not to be held responsible. This is the tone of feeling which the Reviewer has pourtrayed t and can it be doubted but that feelings of this description must act as a powesful exciting cause of resistance on the part of the planters to those reforms which are the objects of their alarm ? Let not this, how ever, be interpreted as any attempt at apology for their misconduct. I. ant disposed to regret, not less than ANGLE'S, that acts of violence have been committed, for which there can be no apology ; and above all, it is to be deplored, that in the Colony to which I have par ticularly referred, so unanimous a sentiment has • pre vailed, that a highly flagrant act of unlicensed outrage has been committed with impunity, instead of entail ing upon the offenders most condign and summary punishment. A NGLUB has thought proper to refer incidentally to what he considers the dangers of the course which Parlia ment and Government have followed, in trusting to the Colonial Legislatures to effect the necessary reforms ; and, of course, by implication, he would also censure the Government and Parliament for not setting aside the powers of the Colonial Assemblies, and imposing at once, by legislative interference, the provisions of the Order in Council, or rather it is to be supposed, provi sions of much greater extent—for ,he bitterly inveighs against the moderation of the Order in Council. This part of the subject is fully discussed in the Review; and I am induced to notice the observations of ANGLUS more for the purpose of keeping in view his principles, than with any intention of here entering epon the merits of a question which he only ventures to deal with by insinuation, and on which Parliament have hitherto tacitly, though unanimously, come to so wise a conclusion. The Parliament of this country will never have the insanity, to look merely at the end, with out any consideration of the means or consequences; and I feel a most satisfactory confidence, that however .deliberately, firmly, and permanently, Parliament may contemplate the ultimate extinction of Slavery as their end, they will only do so with a cautious reference to its accomplishment, 4 , 4 with a fair and equitable considera tion of the interests of all parties concerned therein."— I am, Sir, your obedient and humble servant, , VINDEX. --... Saturday, two sailors, named Hugh Hastings and Alexander Moharg, charged with piracy and mutiny, were removed from Portsmouth jail, in the custody of the Marshal of the Admiralty, to be lodged in Newgate, until the Admiralty Sessions. The account the young men gave at Portsmouth of the circumstances of the charge made against them, is as follows :—They were seamen on board the merchant-ship Havannah packet, bound to Cuba ; the greater part of the crew were fo teigners ; the whole were much dissatisfied at the treat ment which they received from the Captain, whose name was Easton : his conduct towards them was extremely violent, and the provisions of the vessel were not good. —After repeated disputes between•the Captain and the crew, who were thirteen in number, the latter cam* to the unanimous resolution of remaining forwards, and refusing to perform the labour necessary for navigating the vessel, unless certain conditions were complied with on the part of the Captain. In thecourse, however, of a short time, subordination was restored; but soon after flesh discord arbse, and the foreigners, taking_part with the Captain, three of the seamen, who were Eng lishmen, were seized while asleep in their hamMocics, and carried as prisoners to the Havaunah, wheie they were committed to the common jail ; here they describe their sufferings as most severe—the Spaniards were ex tremely cruel in their treatment of the prisoners gene rally, and they remained for nine weeks, their daily al lowance of food being only about two ounces of bread, and three gills of rice ; at length they were put on board' his Majesty's ship Valorous, and brought to England, where they arrived about ten weeks back, and have been since that time in confinement on board the Victory, and in Portsmouth jail. POLICE INTELLIGENO - 11042rUIET. Yesterday fr. Mks, the yoing man charged vritikors :rd. oersted steallsig a gohL sneff-box, the property of Senor Rodri. goes, an Es-Captain in the Spanish Constitutional Army o f A u . daluda, was re.exasnined and committed for trial. • QUEEN.SQUA RE. n a ndegh Sasiek, sties a Lady with many names, was charged with despoiling Peter Evans, a country bumpkin, earned property. Peter paid a visit to Lineman, and, having s acr a. Seed freely to the jolly god, fell in with this modern Venus, wh om he accompanied to ber lodging, and in the morning found him se lf minus Ws. On discovering his look, he liberally offered to be labs lied, if she Would return half, bat thin she refused. lie then ga ve her in charge of a **tetanal; and -his Worship committed krr for trial. MARY-LA.BONNE. Oninfoni, a fellow hi easy circumstances, wasient for th re e - Months' amusement at the treed-int% for having deserted his s vue sad four children these four yearipast. H ATTQN-0 A RD RN. Jane Maedonald and Mews &WA' , were fully comntittesti charged with robbing W. _Humphries, driver of a Birmingham stage-coach. The prosecutor was coming down Goswell street ee Monday night, when the prisoners seised him round the waist, an drew his purse from kb pocket, containing bei*een 21. and 31. UNION-HALL In the castle of yesterday, a woman of respectable appearance, named Pizobete Chloe*, applied to the sitting Magistrate, IL L Coasts:as, Esq. for his advice and assistance it recovering the body of her husband, who died a few days since. The appals*. stated, that she was the lawful wife of James Minch, a lightermsn, who died on Thursday last, and whose body ems detained by the landlord of the hossse in which he expired. Afar her husband's death, she made application for the corpse, is seder in have it interred, but to her toestprendble surprise, the owner of the house refused either to give it ap, or to bury it him. silL Under these circumrtances, eke now begged thaj the Magi'. twig would send an officer with her, to compel the landlord to give up that which, lthough now deadobo still considered berpropeny, as well as when living, The Magistrate asked her whit reason the landlord had for de: tainhig the body' She replied, that she belie/other poor diorama owed him a little money ; but, added she, it ii a hard case, your Worship, that I should be deprived of t he pleasure of putting him under ground. The Magistrate observed, that he was pretty certain, if'ibe told the landlorekthat she had beep before a Magistrate herself, and cosy plained of the affair, he. would then resign up that which abe, no doubt, had more right to than anyone else. The applicant said, that she was convinced no entreaties nor per. suasion, upon her part, would Ineire any effect upon that person, fir he declared, that until ad was settled, even if it should be six months hence, he would not part with the corpse. The Magistrate then diretted a warrant to be made out against the landlord, who shortly afterwards appeared at the oMce, accom panied by the deceased's son. Grassmith, the Aim whe executed the warrant, stated, that he had considerable dillicalty in approaching the defendant's house, the whole neighbourhood being in a terrible state of agitation, in consequence of the circumstance. The Magistrate now called upon the landlord to state why he did not allow the dead man to be interred? The landlord stated, that he bad on band whatever in keeping or detaining the body at his house; although Mr. Church owed hint a little motley, be did not mind; and the sooner the corpse was re moved the better, for ever since his death the house bad been beset by a motrof persons, and among them he observed not a few body snatchers, whom he expected would smitegle away " a subject" be fore long. The dispute respecting Mr. Church's corpse, be added, was between the wife and his son by a former once: ge. The son now stepped forward and said, hit father bad been under the necessity of leaving the widow in consequence of the gross treat. ment he rec,ived from her when living, and for the last three years his parent never saw his unnatural wife, who, notwiths.unding she was aware of his long illness, bad never called to ask after him ; but the moment the breath was out of his body, she came down to the house, shed a few crocodile tears, and insibted that she should haire the body taken to her house, and conveyed from thence to the grave. " But what was all till; for?" said the son ;" why, your Worship, my father was a member of a benefit-club, and at his death the sum of 201. was to be allowed for the funeral expentes, ke. This money she now wants to pt bold of, and pretends to all this distress of mind about a person for whom, when living, she did nut care three straws." He (the son) has had all the tremble, and attended his father late end early during his last illness, and be thought he was entitled to bury him, and certainly had directed the landlord not to allow the body to be carded out of the house.. Tbe wife, in a flood of tears, declared, that it was oat of pure love for herhusband that she wished to bury hint ; the mnney.sbe was entitled to never having once entered her head, until then it was mentioned ; and she would now convince those presint that she was the sole executrix to all his property. The son.—You know you have been Hebei with another man ; ard you are not worthy of the appellation of wife? A noisy squabble here took place between the mother and her step-son, as to which was most entitled to the club-money ; when the Magistrate, perceiving seinedis aiiinet44. both parties was, ob served that it was evident while! the manor the wife cared a far thing about the poor man—it was tie 201. they wanted; and under the circumstances, as the wife held the will and testament of her husband, latched a right to have the body delivered up to her. The son here stated, that be was determined on being at the ex pense of the funeral himself. The Magistrate said, that if he would undertake to bury the deceased, be might do it at his own expense, if be pleased ; but the wife was entitled to the money allowed by the club. The parties then left the °dice, each deviating that they would perform the last ceremonies to the deceased. A PRESENT.—Monday night, as the watchman in Free school -street, St. John's, Horsleydown, was telling eleven o'clock, a woman fell down at the door of the watch-house, opposite him, in great apparent agony, who was immediately taken in, and medical aid was sent for, which arrived just in time to usher into this bustling world a bouncing little gill. The good woman's name is Catharine Skeine ; she had removed from the parish of St. Giles's, with three other children, to thus honour the inhabitants of St. John's. DISCOVERY OT A RICH COPPER MINX IN THE COUNTY ow Wassentn.—A copper mine, mixed with gut. phur, has just been discovered at Parkbawn, near Gorey: An engineer, sent down for the purpose, has reported very favourably of it to the Irish Mining . Company. It is a matter of astonishment that the vast internal re sources of the country have not been turned to account long before this. Everywhere it abounds in mines•and quarries, from lead to gold—from slate to marble, in the midst of an industrious but half famishing popula tion. Employment for the population is chiefly want ing to make that country prosperous and happy. A heart-rending occurrence took place at Pallas Green, Ireland, on Tuesday se'nnight; the particulars are as follow : A man of the name of Phelan having to view a steeple-chase in that neighbourho4 cehis 'wife and two children in - his cabin behind him, and in some time afterwards his-vrife had occasion to proceed to a Meld quite convenient, in order to dig potatoes for dinner. The unhappy woman left her children (the eldest of whom was not four years old) alone in the house ; and it is supposed that they contrived to set fire to some straw or fax in it, for, on her return, she be held her cabin in flames, and one of her infants burned to a cinder, and the other was so dreadfully injured, that death terminated its sufferings on Thursday evening. MIS DAL nes. snis: Franca . 0 0 Handset* 0 2 Flanders 0 arses 0 0 Leeward blob 1 0 America 0 x f {a .43 le • et 0---—v - .% - - --%._1 _ 1_ ' - ,- . ~ ' • +l3 4:i& I 09 4•00 ..., I _ ~.: IS. • 7_ „.....t- -, 4 MAILS—THIS tiki — r. Am am ass. vas: 006Ns 1 s Frames 0 0 Waterford 1 0 lialaborgll 0 2 Gummy and Jam, 0 0 Flaolass 2 0 lAaboo 0 0 Drub 0 0 Hollaod • 0 2 Leeward lamb 1 0 'make 0 0 Awarlea 0 1 Eil 6 H• W ATER at LO NDON-HAMOZ TO•111 It 0. Meru og • - • 58 imbue= Apr 12 Afteragese • • r , , - 4 Wastes after 1 ~.. IG, - - amoweepaemoneememom alweamommowa i . 14)aomi : 'rinsed and Pasidaied by J. ItlLacacy t at the has *Vast _ _ _ No 1, rickeit-Ilegt, therie-Dar. OM= 07,0 • 04' eibliedfr 4.0.84 • 4Vitsfid Ira; MIA Away! - „T i !“ agarfel 'MIAOW 1111110/1 V . Tim m ' be ai l _ :UAVI lnsd ~~~ ~~ i~ ". fir, Yabucoa - U 'Grand , a toe ti i Tir; " .~' :. . rod, tru NM% M or Park 1 Chain *tie% NW* a WOW C! "`.• lrrlw we* Mom lai ibm ~_ . as - 7 .-- logew Or K. 1134.1 au t 2 us. I tit did • I if • e ...al .4',