Star. — London, England, 1802-08-12 00:00:00

IP"'" •, • ~1 1. I.S. SUFFO: zr.s. BUR Y Sr. Eui :i ' s, A IN: t. . t youth iit 19 yeats of age, belonging to the i 3:h Regiment of Drag.ions, teas i:,dieted for roh.,ing NM, Ann But kim. t hani on I!.e King's highway, in the pari st of Ker;.v.svz, of a tilk ;mire, containiog one gainea in gold and five !hinting, and lb pence in tilt cr, oil the t till of May La.— appeared on the vial, that the prifoner was rid ing on the turnpii.e road, %%hen he acco:ted Buckingham, ao.l another fondle with her, and requeded Inc homer ho , r ive him a :billing, but The iaid, the :tad nor onc,..:.latked her companion to lend her .me ; this the pill titer (who teemed at trait:A by her ;:el l m) f. id, would not do; as he niud h a v e rm.? trom he! ; he then laid his hands on her Iluatlder, and polled her (tom n ; the laid, if he would let her get up, the would give him one, whir i he acoordingiy slid ; and, when the took nut her runic for that pa rte, he (hatched it from her, but the thatched it again from him, and returned it into her pocket ; after sibich Mils B. quietly luffered him to pin hi• hand itglll her poc ket, and to take out her purte ; this he had no koner dor.e. than the m6l coach coming up, he galloped ofF with the fame, and a hue and cry be ing iitilantly made, he was loon after apprehended in Ipfwieh barracks. On the part of the priibner, it was very ably con tended, by Countelior Attn R SON, that the capital part of the indiament would not hold good, as the lady confelfed bedsit', dining the whole time, not to have been under the lead influence of fear of her life ; bathe Judge was of opinion, that the taking of any thing from a 'whin againfl their content juttified the formal words of the indict ment in :Itch cafes. Captain Morris, of the t3th dragoons, gave the lad a molt excellent charac ter for 'tonally and integrity; and related, that the pritimer, who had iuliticd into a fencible regiment at Southampton, ism employed on (hip board as a fervant to the onicers in their [mirage to St. Do raingo, in the Welt Indies,' and: bad condantly flept in their cabin, where lie might have had ma ny opportunities of pilfering ; that Capt. Morris had afterwards taken him as a fervant, during which period he (Captain Morrie,) labnured under the afilinior of the yellow fever, which deprived him of his 4tifeA, and that the prifoner was then eotrittled with his property to a very conliderable amount ; that at the particular Iblichation of the Islaj.or of die regiment, he parted from him in or der that he might accompany the Major from St. Domingo to North America ; du: ing which pal 1-age his mailer died of the yellow fever, leaving the prifoner in foie poffefliou of all his property, to the amnunt of nearly Bcool. all of which he faith fatly delivered up to the proper claimants there of, although i.: a ftrange country, where he might elfily, if he had hten dilhonettly dilpofed, have fequellered it to his own ule. Captain Morris further declared, that he would, if acquitted or difcharged, take hirn again into his fervice,in pre ference to any other man in the regiment. There circiimftances, together with the appear ante of the prifoner, who was a handfome, well grown young man, naturally excited the comnii- Utation of the Court; and Lord Acvaw Lev, in palling fentcnct upon him, which he did in / moll vowel:live manner (the neceffity whereof he point ed out, from the determination of his Majcity to wake examples of the military whenever guilty of violence, theft, or outrage) was himfelf fertlbly afftetcd, that at the conclulion his Lordthip burg into tears, and neatly all preterit participated with him. The pl ifoner was alto to deeply affeCted, that he fell down, and fainted in Court. Previous to the Judges quiaing the town, the prifoner was rep:;:ved. THE REV. 14. JAMES V. THE E!V. W. rivtEr. - _ _ This was an aflion brought by tha plaintiff, cu rate of St. Peter's and St. Gregory's, Sudbury, "Taint} the defendant, who is incumbent of the fail parifhes, to recover fatisfn9ion in damages (which were laid at ic...;c1.) for fcvcral libels pub lithed by th 4 defendant. The declaration con tained twelve counts, in the fir(' of which, the general words publifhed were flitted, and in the remainder the fever al detached parts thereof ; two of which cliaTed the defendant with canting and procuring letters to be written to himfelf, and then malicioufly puhlifhing the fame with a view to hitt: e the piano ill's chara&er.—Mr. beijcant SF LIMN addrefreei the Jury at confiderabk length, in fappot t of the anion, Hating the injurious and malignant t;ndency of the letters publillied, to the chataaer if his client, both as a man and a der lyman, who, previous thereto, had gained the ove and admiration of his parithioners. The IA witrefs tailed proved the admifnon of the plaintiff to the Deacon and Priett's orders by the ilithop of Sodor and Man, in the years 1796 and i 797, in the file of Man. The Rev. Richard Snape, of Bolton, in Lanca -11.1:-_, tlated, diet he had received a letter from the Rev. Mr. Fink. ; , (to whom lie had formerly been Cu-ate), inquiiing into the general charaeler of Mr. Jan:cs, who had retided at Mancheiter, but which ltit,:r from Mr. F. be had de(lroyed with many rilhrs, it being his en:km not to preferve any but thofc material to his own coacerns—he acknowledged die letter now thi:wn to him in Court tote his own hand-writing—he laid that he ii.‘d not becn ins iced by Mr. F. in his letter to give an unfavourable account of Mr. James, but metely to make iv.quiries in die neighbourhood refpefling atid to write the refoilt thereof to Mr. Fin ley ; lie recolleeled that the Rev. Mt. Newman's name was made ufe of in Mr. Finley's letter to him, and that the letter had mentioned an inti mate conneloor having taken place between Mr. James and Iviifs Nrv.man, a young Lady about 19—the witti.AS faid Mr. J. was a widower, and that lie under rtond !t: had ken Chaplain on board a man of war, io Fir Edward Pellew's fhip. The letter of Mr. Snape was then read, and contained anu.r.g nther things, the words charged in the de claration. viz. "That lie (the plaintiff) had treat ed his wife in a molt inhuman and brutal manner tr... .. ___.__ .__i__.._.. __ t__ nefly=that he was a, notorious liar, even to a provetb--that he was an artful and dcligning I,in, having collated fabfcriptions for building a chapel and tun away with the money—that he WA • C'intinually drunk, and a w..rie character could not exiit." The conclution of Mr. Snapc's letti:i warned the Rev. Mr. Newman againd admitting him into his bottle, and his daughter against en con raging his addreifes, as there were few places or frmilizs into which he once gained admittance, but what had caufe to repent thereof. . _ Dr. Maclean laid he knew the Plaintiff and De fendant, and that the former came tecommended to Mr. F. as a citrate at Sudbury a little before Eager 18ol—that at that time and fubfequently he appeared to be approved by the pal ilhioners; that he remembered being at Mr. Finley's at dinner when Mr. James was the fubjed of converfation— that he ceafed to be Curate loon after 1802—that he remembered a difpnte about the Sidefmen, and Mr. F.'s telling him Mr. James had behaved ex tremely ill in the church, by ufing language un becoming of a clergyman, and lwearing at them— that Mr. Finley (hewed Dr. M. a letter he meant to fend to Mr. James, advifing him to quit the curacy withnut giving further trouble, in confe quence of his mtibehaviour—the witnefs laid that Mr. F. had afterwards (hewn him Mr. Snape's let ter, but in confidence, as a jullification of his own char:after, and produced the fame to others with reludance, Mr. J.'s ft iends having excited a cabal in the parifh, and thought Mr. F. harlh in dill milling him from the curacy without a reafon; this was in the autumn of iSo t. Dr. M. was pre fent at an interview between the two parties in March, I 0102, and recollects a letter being limn n from Sir Edward Pellew ;—that the Plaintiff at firti denied or doubted its being from the Captain. bait after. wards acknowledged part of its contents to be true. [ !she letter was then produced, but there being no witnefs to prove the hand writing, it was not fir tiered to be read in Court.] Dr. M. laid, that he had figned the certificate in April iflox, hoping that the Plaintiff was a man of character ; that the meeting was held at the regale(' of Mr. James, Metirs. Clark, Froll, Crofs, Strutt, Mr. \V. Oh. ver, Mr. Baynes, hitnfelf, and the Plaintiff, being prefent. He Paid that he knew the Rev. Mr. Ncw. man, and that he was extremely averfe to the Plaintiff's conneCtion with his daughter f r om firli to lag ; had heard that Mr. James came to Bury in a poll chaife with Mifs Newman without her father's confent. [The certificate of the meeting was then read, which let forth that Mr. Finley was iidlifiable in making inquiry refpeCting his curate, if the documents produced were true, but unu ar- Tamable in the mode he had adopted refpeCting them—at the fame time Rating Mr. James had conducted himfelf with propriety as Curate, whilft at Sudbury.] Dr. M. laid, a little ref •Ation had convinced him that he had done wrong, and he repented of figning the certificate ; but on Mr. James's producing a number of letters in his own behalf, he was pleated to find he could produce any thing to jultify his charaeler. [Thele letters were propofed to be read in Court, but were ob jetted to by Mr. MACKINTOSH, the Defendant's Connie!, unlefs Sir Edward Pellew's was firit read (none of the hand writings being attelted), oblerv. ing that Mr. James's letters were from Methodist preachers belonging to Lady Huntingdon's chapel, too of which might eafily be procured, but would have no weight with him.] Mr. Strutt, merchant, of Sudbury, was prefent at Mr. Finley's dinner, when the converfation took pl ice about Mr. James, but never law the letter till produced at the meeting—that Mr. Finley, in confequesce, (hewed him a letter from Mr. Booth of Mancheller, it having been alledged that Mr. Finley had tiled Mr. James ill. Mr. Frog, attorney, and town-clerk of Sudbury, laid he was in the church at the time of the difinite between Mr. James and the Sidefmen, but laid that part of Mr. Finley's letter to Mr. James, which Rated his having (worn at them, was untrue—that there had been a noife in the church, and he ac coled the Sidefmen of not having done their ditty in keeping filcnce—that the latter were rather imper tinent to him, and Mr. J. laid, " you are a let of fcotindrels, and ought to be fent half way to hell." He had pill left the pulpit . Mr. Finley never (hewed him Mr. Snape's letter, but he underftood it had been (hewn. The above is the fubllance of the evidence which came out on the examinati .n and crofs-examina tion of the Plaintiff's witnelFes. Mr. MACKINTOSH then role, and in a fpeech which hiked upwards of an hour in the delivery, entered into a moll brilliant and eloquent defence of the Defendant's conduCt, which he juilified as truly continent and proper, in inquiring into the former charafter of his Curate,after the difgraceful and fcandalous manner in which he had conduCted himfelf in the difpute with the Sidefmen at the church—he laid the tendency of Mr. Snape's letter had been fully confirmed by that of Sir Edward Pellew and the Rev. Mr. Booth, of Mancheller, though not permitted to be read—that he was a Wolf in Sheep's clothing—had been a Methodiß and field preacher—arid that he had attempted to dettroy the peate and happinefs of aw•orthy clergy man in the fame town, by alienating his daughter from her obedience and reverence for a venerable parent ;—he then, in a moll pathetic and feeling manner, warned the deluded young Lady (who was prefent) againn countenancing the addreffes of a man fo completely depraved, as the regarded her future happinefs, or thole connefted with her. After much very fevere and pointed remark on the conduct of the Plaintiff, he contended that the Jury could not continently give him one farthing da mages, as he laid the publication of the letters was not done in a manner that constituted the leatt de. gree of malignity on the part of his client, but only in felt-defence. The learned Judge (Lord ALVANLEY) briefly formed up the evidence, Itating the law on the fubjeel, and left it to the confideration of the Jury, whether the Defendant had wantonly expofed the letters in que(ion with a malevolent intention to injure the Plaintiff, or only in Pelf-defence--obferv. ing that the count charging the Defendant with procuring there letters to be written to hirnfelf had they might have been thewn to more perfons than was thecctrat y. The Jury, without the leak hefitation, gave a vet did tar the Defendant ; and at a quarter bzf: rc hrce on Sun Jay morning the Court bruk.: up, and du: Allizes concluded. SURREY ASSIZES. Cui.nroen, AUGUST r t.—George Brown was itieli4ted for teloniouily atiaulting, &c. Elizabeth Wyk s. The profccutrix is a little girl, about twelve years of age, of a delicate and rather emaciated appearance : her evidence was given very coned. edly, as follows :—She went out in the beginning of July to gather hurts, with two little boys; when they had filled their haikets, it began to rain ; the then went towards home, and on her way met Brown, who :liked her to !land up out of the rain ; the did and after a few minutes he went a little way to ice if it had left off raining ; on his return in a minute or two, he afftiled her and atqed the indiament charges. After he had perpetrated the atrocious clime, he offered to give her a half penny not to tell; the laid fhe would tell, the woman the lived with how he had 'ferved her.— He laid if the did he would kill her. In confe quence of this threat, and the fear the had that her mithels would beat her, the kept it fecret till near a week after. Sufan Sweatman corroborated the teftimony of the profecutrix. Mr. New land, a furgenn, was called in to exa mine the girl when the complaint .was made.— Upon examination, he WAS not fatisfied that the prifoner hackcAnpletely effeaed his purpofe. The Learned Judge, from this evidence, v: as of opinion, that the Well way would be to acquit the wit - otter of this charge, and he would take care that another indiamnt ihould be prefaced arraintt hint for the alrault; 'Die Jill), under the direftion of the Learned Judge, Acquitted the ricotta accordingly. illarsartt /hew was next tried for a burglary in Bertnottdiey, and found Guilty. William Grrenbrad, for healing a gelding, the pro perty of John and James Beihcl,was found Guilty, after a thort It Lid. 'thortas, a black, was tried for haling in the thselhtig-honfe of Peter Malone, funsiry ar ticle.) of wearing apparel, his property. The Jury found a verdia of Guilty of the fim ple felony, and the Learned Judge, after a very revere reprimand, patted fentence of tranfportation for ftven years on the prifoner. fifichad IVuod was indiCled for feloninufly ing a brown bode, the property of PERCIVAL. EVANa, Efq. Of Cie va:ue of 301. and convicted upon the cleared evidence. George Brown wa• again put to the bar, to take his trial for an atiaolt, with intect to oommit rape on the body of Elisabeth Wyles. The evi dence was precifely the fame as on the former trial. The Jury found him Guilty. The Learned Judge, in a moll impreffive fpeech, espatiate.l on the enormity and atrocity of the prifuner's offence. He then paired fentence on him : to be imprifoned for the fpace of two years, and during that time to be kept to hard labour. DILL V. BARAFTT AND ANOTHER. This was an anion for an aff.tislt and Life im prilonmcnt. Mr. Serjeant BEST (fated, that the real defen dant upon this record was a Mr. Hiafon; the ::..Ftion was nominally brought againit the two perfoas accrued in the record, who were Officers to the Sheriffs of Surrey. The fans (.1 the cafe were as I,llow :—A pert;,n of the name of Thomas Gill had accepted a Bill of Exchange drawn by perfons of the name of Vivant, Vandercoom and Co. who were employed by Hiafon the indorfer of that Bill, to recover it from the acceptor, and the writ w.ts put into the hands of the defendants. They, by nriaake, arreited Gill, who was the plaintiff in the relent anion. If they had correned their mil take as foon as it had happened, he Ihould not have advifed the plaintiff to have brought the pre fent anion; but, inflead of that, they had wan tonly detained his client in cultody for the (pace of three days. Mr. Gill, the plaintiff in this caufe, had been a refpenable merchant, but at the time he was thus injurioufly arretted, he was, unfortu nately, under fome degree of embarraffment, which made the miltake doubly injurious to him. He was arrefted on a Friday, and the next day he wrote to Mellis.Vandercoom and co. attornies in the caufe, informing them that he was not the perfon they meant, and rcqueifed that he might be fet at liberty. They fent to him a very intelli. gent man, a Mr. Fletcher, who conduned their bufinefs, and he, initead of ordering his dire& li beration, bad the modell) to alk that Mr. Gill fluid enter an appearance to the anion. This he molt properly retuied. It was then, with equal moderation, required that he fhould make an affi davit that he was not the perfon. This he alfo refuted, and, at the fame time, told them he would appeal to the laws of his country for redrefs.— Here he could not help making one remark to the Jury. The anion was brought upon a note of hand, which, of condi, had to it the hand-writing of the acceptor, the fuppofed prefent plaintiff--- They could, therefore, have compared the hand writing between the note of hand and the letter, and have Wet ved if there was any tirnilatity. In head of being convinced by their diffrmilarity, Mr. Fletcher affefed to be convinced that they had takcn the right perfon. The confequence of this proceeding was, that the prefent plaintiff was de tained until the Monday night before he was dif. charged. The Learned Serjeant fail, that fuch cafe as this was one molt peculiarly touching the intereffs of Engliihmen. Perfonal liberty was one of their deareit rights; and he was fure that an Englilh Jury would not fuller it to be violated with impunity. They would put themfelves in the fame fituation with the plaintiff, who now fought redrefs at their hands. They would feel what his fenfaions mutt be, and what they would exiled from a Jury of their countrymen if they flood in his fituation, demanding redrefs for Arch an injury. The meafure of jultice which they would expert from others, was that which now they onslit to meafure out to him who claimed fome compenfa .•e . • • him. Three witneffes were called %el.(' • cafe as dated by Mr. Serjeatit 11r.sr. I).teid I-Ittehes fai•l, he skas uu I.r ..•11 arr. : l qt.! time the affair took place. the :litetiff's Officer, make caption i - he came into ci:ito..l!•F at Lcy's Lo c k •; • ;„, hne Lc was confined lion . ) the it•• ; .!:•• M•anl.t.; veining. lipon .rots (•;::••••2:•.: 1 ; nied that he knew any thing 4 t!,.: ; did not know that he went to itel a•L, ..• Notes or Neoland the bald:lnn:, wIr•• I , • • ools.d to have feacted. Ilr %ea, .4 itinni.ll, nor ever ani.L.l proceln.s. Robert Morris alto prwed , , fend.uit. He w,is prAnit when • • OlTicer, toll i'Ltdier IL,: who denic,l that he was the • Fletcher l'aid he v. as the tutu, a:.‘l ;• mutt keep him, an.l that .. Ann Vivant, the wife cf the tiv:r.v:r.- p,;i• laid, that at the till the plaintif v,:is hu(band was in the King's came to her on Sunday afternoon, the :!t'• She told him that Gill they had arreitzd the Gill who was her bufb.tild's fiiend. She !: teen him the fame day, previous to her Fletcher. Mr. Gattitow, for the defeit.lant, f.iid , that nu. thing but the zL.II which his I.e. ailed Fliei:d 1.11 :always for his client, could have made him tintr f ferions an addrcis. He agreed %skit the Lat:.,:a Serjeanr, that it would have been a teii ns c: ! e if a refue&able merchant, though an titif•romc z one, had Inen wantonly detained in ciclodv ; what !moot had they of the tel of t!),, prefent plaintiff None at all. Mr. Carlow 01: 1 reprefented him As a Bill-broker, and not if ill bat of char:Acts; and that whey. it was a quetti,a who the acceptor was of the name of Gil, Sheriff's Officer., irom the known cliata.a,r the plaintiff, immediately concluded that he na..t be the man. He then went into an examinici. of what polFible malice either the Indorfer of Bill, the Aunt hies, or even the Sheriff's could have againd the plaint 4; their only of jed mull be to get the righ.. 1 homas Gill, and it , hey took the plaintiff, it could only originate iv. mittake. The CHIET BAUM faid, • the relent bufirsei clearly originated in ; but when a peril had made a mistake, he was houti , l to redity it as fpeedily as paible; and it he did not, it oug:: to enhance the damages. The Jury would c.m Eider whether it was done in this e.l , and app.:. ti , in the damages as they Ihould believe the fad :3 be.--Verdid for the Mimi if—damages 4os. BIR Tuefday, at Charley, in Suffes, the Lady of G. E. Gram, Efq. of a Inn._ thurfday laft, at Cranthattt, the Lady of Montague Cho!. meley, Efq. jun. of '•" and heir . Su .day, In Charkezi`• fquare, F dinburgh the Lady of Jams C aquhuun, F.fq. y4aug..r of Luce, of a diughter. MARRIED. Tuefday Taft, at Windfor, the Rev. Thomas Carter, of Eton Cohere, to Mil; I'rudlor, of Windfor. At Forres, on the sth inft. John H. Forbes, IN. Advon:t., to Mils L.ouifa Cnnuning, third daughter of A. I'. Con::a.hg Gordon, Efq. of Aityrc, M. P. ' Mr. Richards, of Holborn HA father of the Staaczre Company. At stifling, the 26th ult. Je&y 'rotary, ynungeft (!aughta of Captain ovey, of Cie lat., sth regiment of Scots In thc un the 23th ult. Mrs. Ker, rchet (tithe Rev. julin Xtr, Izt! Mini to of Carmiaiiiiiek. iq!re.NT. On the 37th ult. at Lic-,:rptitil, after a I,,ng Pure!, Eiti. late (.1 , the iihtnd of liar!ia,iGes. On th.: ad iiiii,.nt. at Rotherham, 11r Wil!Linf in cum-mer chant from hit gig, on the pr.c.- ii o Fri,l4, he tutfortunately linike his leg, a mortih.:atioa !allowed, a,i2M three days he was a curefe. HIGH At LONDON ISRIDGF. TO-MORROW Mortdm sc ratuutr, atter A ttensoon IS atieutv , attr• . WHEN l'rutefiiimal 111e14 of eJt:c.tfun, ;e -fponfibility deviate from the general fjarat the ft leaden of a peculiar Branch, the Ida:dim' of 10...; com,dwil facceis is the litit criterion of fur crio: 1. Eight ye? ni have I devmtd practir, 70 the e treat ment of Thißl , .l; 1:1SOlt1)1T.S, awl tie malt GC my plan gives nig at' mr to °pro!. zs ::11 4, 1 ant able the ravage: of :init. endiplaim. ,chich arc the molt iai ere. ant in the e ttILIVIC o^mmau Mfirmi!'o. After hdtiatien into every bench as an Army iurre )5. formed a with at an culy period or Prze - tice to reftuz from the i/ .. .noraac of uneducated Men, or tLc eryually aav• ;emus precipitancy of getirr.tlPraztitioners The THREE: I.)II()ItitERS, to the cure of which I hzv voted my attention, comprize every (pecks of VENCRE.iL INFEL:110111, whether of a recent or long &traria. All kinds id . DEWI.ITY, wlu-rh..r arifing front the haE . , 4! Schoolboys, or the indillgLm:e of mature age, and Ldttc :ha! :I:- rangtment ef the fyitem in W‘niten wdich is called HARK`!. NE ,S or STERILITY. _ . Numerous difeafes are the rtfult of ignorance or Mite in the treatment of a fimplv Gonorrhea, an.lit not untrequently lazy pens that the reeds of Lee are pcsifoned by the Ind: ereion of ia unguarded hour. By a fuperior method filch con,;:bento 371 tartly cured, and even where others have tidal, trod the I may prefume to °O'er a radical re-ettabibliment Few, however, are tie cafes of complicated lifted': in :!.1 difordtr,com2ared with the cabouitoas lituations of '.l.:r.,a'ts f: em Lalulrenec ill0a)1.1TA itY VICE, or thv pro: de..t Jae• tics of a fathitirable Life, acquire that itate of !tel.:Lit) . svt._:sli is the unavoidable confcquencc of fuch pernicious ItaNts. Where the unhappy fullither broods over his milere,',-,:: tare fully conceals his :::isfarttine, it may be f'arne con -tat:or !'t him to lemon', that :11theugh it be au oh . iirsti of !WA::: tainty with other Practitioners, the reinev al 'O, euf, - CIENCIES by the gradual progre. of lt curfflariar. ;.. •,.. = • fluent of my experience.' It tin. rites begun to rlalti.;: manl much astsii•t : • by an early counter, illon tit this lac.ituiti cafes he great difficulties will occur. But where this Di.ficioncy t•is for st•• •rsoilit-s1 • ! •' •••• teveranee is riojuitit rrvive the klitawrt of Life, and to re-at imatt the L'onttit 'Moo. MARRIED WONT N, who have loth."='""' • in their ezreClation , .. of a Family, ni.iy ..• ..,..,i :tiftances fuck defeat; arc curable by iiedi. •1 The SECRFCY which i s fuell'innial UP,.ertllti - .A , • a the Qualifications which I have pt4...: • •intr , l to ttarc, al& 1 11 Y Vrstonfiors, and in coincidence with. Ityth dr • !" 1 alatioo is 1;veo, th:tt Mr a may he car:Ton-11x M • -. 01 (•,r by Itt ter. inclofing a imall ni.te; at L.: hou: - .% tic. o! t3tratid, t•eor Ternole-Bar There is an adclition:l catrsuce Watcr-11. - . L! and the name u on V. B Mes'i— thc. (*- I `c •-• tor t:•e .ty r. It i ;,to t tAN: (or Cartotl-ftrat) th: ;.; ea' Nit t:•(), :N• ••. Carty-Arcot ; and pabli itcd oy Lis •t• t tebory-place, I..ar•betiti. t! Na t, rt.::. . • = 87 Az-Ortcz, Tem.:lc-1W; to wbirtt (!t s elf*