Star. — London, England, 1805-08-02 00:00:00

Lifllr INTELL IGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, AUGUST s. PETITION OF J(IHN KING. The LORD CHANCELLOR." The circumflances conneard .%ith the certificate of this bankrupt, are, in fum e particulars, perfe&ly new. In tBO2, a MA. minion And against John King, and he fbbfequent ly liated that he bad duly attended his examinations, and fur tendeted the -whole of his property. While this petitioner was before the Court, on the applica f cation for his certificate on thefe grounds (and others required by the ads with regard to the eonfent of the proportion in number and value of the credi. tors), Meas. Gordon, Stirling, and Co. and Meas. Pollard and Ofborne, applied that the certificate fhould be flayed until they had either proved their c:ebts, or made their eleaion if they would or would nut fo prove. Doting thefe proceedings, it occurred to me, to lobk into the certificate hien; which was accompanied with the affidavit of a young perfon of the DM! of Laurens ; and the /flak of the infpee tion was the difcovery that the eertifirate had been pre pared before the Cammipti war taken out. The figna tures themfelves confirmed my riling furpicions, for they were written over erafures, and I found the cer• tificate was accommodated in the firs inftanee to a joint commifflon, although the commiflion itfelf was only againft this individual, John King. Hence nu merous other erafures became necelTary to the pro jea, and they are evident on the face of the inaru ment. Then it appeared, that the young man to whom I alluded was initruaed by John King, at that time in prifon, to go round to feveral perfons to require them to retrace the names on the certificate with a dry pen, and thefe are the fignatures which are to fanaion this document. But what was the ropers of the accounts ? The bankrupt was to el:laver up fecurities and aids to the amount of too,oool. when the debts were only Rated at loop!, leaving a balance of upwards of 90,0001. ; fo that vie are at firft furprifed how any bankruptcy could have taken piece. What is the `vault I Of this t oo,ocol. not toool. has been produced in effects, and no part even of this rum has devolved into the bands of the general creditors, under the commillion .-the whole was applied to expenses attending the ' bank. tuptey. The petition is of great importance, and calls upon me to do fome aft to enforce the Commif ficiners to certify, that the natutes have been complied with, prefatory to' the application of the Great Seal to the certificate. On this two queftions arab : If I am armed with any power to Jo this i~ adly. If, not having thi'Power, I may do it by hint or in timation, or to any other way ? The Commillioners are bound by a folemn oath in thefe terms I do (wear, that I will faithfully, impartially, and honeff ly, according to my (kill and knowledge, execute the feveral powers anti truffs, as Cornmiffioney of Bank. rapt againa —, and that without favour, affec tion, prejudice, or malice.' Can I iffue from this Court a mandat to contronl the confeiencet, of per- Cons under this facred obligation ? If this authority could be any where exerted, it would hem to be more properly repofed in the Court of King's Bench; mod if the Commiffioners, to a mandamus emanat ing from thence, thould return their oath, and that they *had religioully regarded it, how that high Court would difpofe of the mandamus, it is not for me to determine. The troll in the Commillioners is ab folute; to their difcretion the whole is refigned ; and fome paufe, fome ex a mination is required, when we confider the humanity of the 'creditors ; for there is no Aronger proof of the good nature and humanity of the Britilh charader, than the promptitude with which they fign the certificates of bankrupts. What are the reafons aligned by the Commiffioners for their conduit ? (and one of the bell fecurities ajar. tice is the publicity given to all our proceedings.).-- They Cay, that the bankrupt declared, unlefs his cer tificate were allowed, he would fuperfede the Corn million. They add, that they required the bank rupt tc explain what he intended to imply by this avowal, and that they received no Catisfa&ory an t-wer to convince them that it wags Lonafide Commif lion. I can give no direaion to the Commifhioners, according to the prayer of this petition ; I can only !mix they will ad agreeably with the diaates of their confciences, and continently with the language of the oath, without favour, affection, prejudice, or malice." (His Lordfliip, in the courfe of his °bier vations, took an enlarged view of the bankrupt laws, of the exoneration of. the individual by the certifi cate, and of the difcretion to be exercifed by the Keeper of the Great Seal in its applicatioo.) The Chancellor concluded with adverting to the expeaa tions of the petitioner on the death of Lord.Belvidere, in right of his wife, Lady Lanefborough, and on the Qoncealment Itated by the Commiflioners, in Yelped to that property.—The petition was difmiffed. }MILLIE V. BAILLIE. In this caufe the LORD CHANI:ELLOR pronou4ge4 on the interlocutory application (we noticed in our report of yeacrday) for the payment of 81161 i 17s. into Court.. He Paid, that the admilEon in the 4th and sth anfwers of George Baillie was not fuill ciently precife and unequivocal to jai& the Court in ordering that Defendant to pay the amount. With regard to the other Defendant, Archibald Alves, the determination w•as.poflponed until to-morrow. . _ ADAIR 'V. THE NEW RIVER COMPANY. The LORD CH ANceLLog pronounced judgment in Ibis cattle to the following effea-- , ‘ This is a bill by Mr. Adair, who s flateshimfelf to be entitled to an annuity of 5001. which was fecured as early as the reign of Charles 1. under a grant by that King, of a moiety of the profits of-the New River Waterworks. The title to this annuity is deduced by allignment to the prefent Plaintiff. The fubßance of the bill is this: that he being entitled to fuck annuity, has been required to pay 0. in the'pound as land tax, in , re. fpe& of that annuity. The mode of receiving it is this:. The :Inv River ComPany have paid him scol. deduling 4s. in the pcund; the Company being of feffable for the land tax. The affeiftnent ageing the Company has proceeded on the cltimate of a profit of 18,0001. per annum. He has.cornpelled, the Com pany to acknowledge that their prOfits exceed I R,oool. annually ; but he has not gone on to Mk how much the gains furpafs that amount. The Court could have albertained.this on a proper application, by dittOing a reference to the Moller, but.there ex bled reafons for avoiding this enquiry *auk, whatever the profits might he, they would bo if. liable to the extent of one-fifth, or 0. in the pound; and, if after this difeovery, the CoMmiftioners of the ' Land Tar performed their duty, there could be no jolt ground of complaint. Thus, were the gains difcovered to be po,oool. the furn of to,oool. would be the affelfment. The Plaintiff , lays, Ido not pay one Ming more than •I ought, but you paying fo mach lefs than you ought, 1 have recourfe to a Court of Equity to enable me to conflia with you, that I as well as you may pay lets than I ought to do.' In order to lay the ground for this proceeding, the Plaintiff Rates, that the Company are entitled to receive the whole of the profits; and, in conliquence of the expences one of our Kings had incurred in the profecution of the works, the conceffion of one moiety of the emolument was made to the Sovereign. In this fituation of things, I have no doubt on my mind, if it were thought expedient, the King could, by procefs in a Court of Equity of Revenue, have compelled the produaion of an account, which would Rate all the advantages in the courfe of the management of the concern. Pofterior to that grant to the Crown, his Majefly difpofes of his moiety to Sir Hugh Middleton, and to his heirs for ever. The whole feems to be a mutual agreement. By virtue of the Royal prerogative, the Prince was to fuftain their interefts, and under the fame authority the right to the moiety was to be fupported. Afterwards the proportion fo devolving to Sir Hugh was aliena ted to an infinite number of proprietors; fo that the number of claimants could not with any precifion be afcertained in the Mailer's office, even by the Com pany. On this cireumftance it is argued, that the Plaintiff cannot fue in equity, becaufe he cannot bring before the Court all the proprietors under the Royal grant, as well as the Company. No doubt, generally fpeaking, this is confiftent with the rule of the Court; but it may lately be doubted, if you can &etch this rule to an extent which will utterly deftroy the objea for which it , was created. Here the King's fkare has been fplit into fuch a number of ownerffiips, that it would be impoffible to bring be fore the Court all the parties interelled, and it feems Ito me fufficient, if the Plaintiff introduce as many of them as by due diligence he can collect. We are not divefted of precedents applicable to this Cubic& Where a - party have a right to demand fervices from numerous individuals, as in the inilance of a mill, when the perfons confuming corn within a certain diftria are to grind at that iltufture, it is not in this cafe required, that the complainant thould bring each individual into Court, liable to confume corn, within the limit prelcribed. This the Court has confidered impratlicable ; all that it requires is, that to many fhould be :made parties, as may be competent to try the legal cineftion, both trick regard to their own right, and that of others. When the privilege at law is ellablifbed, the courfe is eafy ; the Plaintiff has only to expofe to obfervation his legal right, and the redrefs fought is immediately conceded. Al though this objeaion is removed, I am fo gravelled with another difficulty, that I do not fee how it is poffible for the Court to interpofe, and the obilruc tion is increafed by the purchafe many of the inter• cited parties have made of their Land Tax ; yet, if the Company were hereafter to be afraid to the full amount of the proms, the members would have no ground of complaint, becaufe certain of their num ber had been permitted to redeem the tax. But this is not a cafe in which the Plaintiff jays, Let me be affeffed to the land-tax by loch a pound-rate as may be impofed on me, in refpetft to my intereft ;' but he lays, the Company is not fufficiently taxed, and I leek to be in the fame degree exonerated.' Yet there is an exprefs claufe in the Adt, that the profits of the Company (ball contribute four (billings in the pound, and this pool. is parcel of thefe profits. Then it comes to this: Is Mr. Adair Mating that he has paid no more upon his annuity than is legally due) to expea that this Court is to give him a decree, to di mini& the burthen it is his duty to fuflain ? It ap pears to me that the Plaintiff has not this equity in his favour, and that I cannot diced, that Mr. Adair fhould participate in the gains of thole who have contrived to pay much lets than by law they ought to have done."—Petition difmiffed. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JULY 23. JOHN NM I /SQ L AND OTHERS V. WILLIASS HUSBARD, The Plaintiffs are allignees to the cane of Caftell, Powell, and Co. the Defendant is a merchant. This was an anion cf trover, to recover five feveral Bank of England notes, procured from the faid banks upts and convetted by the Defendant to his own ufe. The amount of the notes was 8751. out of which the De fendant had paid a5Ol. towards releafing Merits. Cal len, Powell, and Co. from an extent iffued again(! them. Mr. ERSKINE, for the Plaintiffs, °braved, that no poflible queftion could arife on the prefent cafe, but the important one, whether the Gentlemen for whom the Plaintiffs aged as affignees, had or had not com mitted an ad of bankruptcy ? It wes the more ne ceffary he fhould explain fome parrieularsionneded with this fubjea, becaufe two decifions had been had in the Exchequer, adverfe to this bankruptcy. It was well known to every individual on the Jury, that Meffrs. Cafiell and Powell were eminent bankers in this city. In confequence of the improvidence of one of the partners, and of the loffes the houfe had fuf tained, their affairs became embarraffed,and a fcheme was formed to remove Caflell from the concern.— 'Phis gentleman was at that time debtor to his part ner, Mr. Powell, upon bond, upwards of e 0,0001.— ,In this fituation of their concerns, Mr. Powell con• fulled with Mr. Bebh, and with the Defendant, on the means of redeeming the houfe. Mr. Bebb had !pent much ofhis time in India, and was a gentleman of conftderable fortune. On the inveftigation of the ac counts at fiat, there appeared a balance againft them of 60,00c1. but, on a more correct view, it was difco vered to amount to no left a (urn than 92,0001. Mr. Calla was a ftranger to the interviewsfor the purpofe of this examination,and beingo( a nervous habit, and advanced in years, they did not think it right to awaken hie apprehFnfions until the fate of the firm was ultimately decided. Whatever aft of bankrupt cy, therefore, Mr. Caftell committed, was not in con fequence of any previous concert, but was the refult of his own fears, uninfluenced by the exterior caufes •connefted with the confultations held, to which the learned Counfel had jud alluded. On the alt of bank ruptcy committed by Mr. Powell, not the (Malted doubt was entertained ; the teftitripny, therefore, would be principally directed to the aft of Mr. Canal. The Defendant had procured the bank-notes referred to, on the day previou. to the Roppage of the lionfe, with a perfed knowledge of all the particulars of the impending bankruptcy, and it would be for the Jury to determine, if in this predicament this action of tro• ver could or could not be maintained. John Serle was a confidential clerk at the banking houfe, and depofed to the concealment of-Mr. Callen in an upper apartment, in Lombard.fireet, on the day when payments were fufpended. This account was confirmed by Abigail Pinder, the boufekeeper. But the proof was incomplete until James Kelly appeared.—" I refute (laid he) to take the oath until my bill is paid." • Mr. GAR ROST." What is the amount of your claim ?"—R. " My dernand is 861. Bs. 5d." Mr. GARROW..—" You mull be (worn. although, you do not open your mouth." (The oath was then . adminifiered.) Q. " Will you takr6ol. for your debt ?"—A. " No, I will have the whole." The SOLICITOR.GENERAL.-.." He mull not only have the whole amount, but he mull give a releafe, to the Plaintiffs before he can be a competent witnefs." A cheque on a hanker was then handed to the witnefs for 861. Bs. sd. but he would not utter a fyi. fable, until he was atfured by the Gentlemen at the Bar, that the draft should be paid. Tlle releafe was then given, and his evidence was decifive. Be fully proved, that Mr. Well had ordered himfelf to be denied to his brewer, who had a claim of tool. and upwards, and who applied for the difchatge of bis bill prior to the firiking of the docket, Mr. Grey, the principal Clerk of Me as. Cana, Powell, and Co. proved the delivery of the notes con fiituting the fum of 8751. to the Defendant. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL (aid, that the day on which thefe notes were received, WO prior to the Qoppage of payment, and that, as no all of bank. ruptcy was committed untl fubfequent to their deli very to the Defendant, t hey were the property of Meas. Callen, Powell, and Co. and were not veiled in their Affignees ; the !tonic had a right to alienate them, and this aCtion of nova, brought by the Plaintiff, could not be fufiained. Lord ELLE miroitotro it, in fumming up the evidence, remarked, that the true quetlion was, if by taking the notes, at the time he did, the Defendant improved his fituation by collation with the Bankrupts.—Ver did for the Plaintiff, 6151. being the amount of the Bank-notes, deduCting the fum advanced on the ex tent by the Defendant. WILLIAM WEBS V. COUSINS AND oTHIRS. This was a new trial before a Special Jury, on a bond, to which non fli fafium, fraud, and covin, were pleaded. Mr. ERSKINE, for the Plaintiff, Rated what he had obferved to the Jury on the former trial, with Tome additional particulars as to the teftimony of two wit. neffes, with which he was fupplied from materials fur. nillted in the former carafe ; be would not, however, anticipate the anfwer he had to make to there wit flair, left they should be at the prefent time 'fo guarded in their tellimony as to defeat the jolt pre. tenfions of his client. Mr. GARROW, who led the defence at the former trial, was now affified by the SOLICITOR Gassw, who, by the arrangement agreed to be adopted be fore the witneffes on the part of the Plaintiff were called, addreffed his Lordthip and the Jury on behalf of the Defendants : and he Laid, that whatever am biguity the fubjea before admitted, no difficulty could now arife. The Plaintiff bad received a gene ral affignment of the property, of Havre and Suth mier, in Auguß, 18oz. This was an aft of bank ruptcy, if there, at that time, cu lied a creditor to an amount competent to become a petitioner on a commiffion of bankruptcy. Mr. Minton, a butcher at Battle-bridge, was a creditor at that time to the extent of sod. which was double the amount necef fary to authorife the petition. The fads were (port ly thefe : Mr. Webb had lent to the horde of Court, Havre, and Suthmier, to the amount of upwards of to,oool. By an ufurious condition attached to the loan, he had (welled the debt to the magnitude of 15 or t 6,0001. The expedient was, by the means of a colourable commiffion on fugars purchafed for the bankrupts, who were fugar•refiners, to extort an exotbitant intered. Court withdrew from the part• nerfhip, and vol. was advanced to him as the price of his refignation. Of this fum, Minton advanced sool. and this was the original of the debt on which he afterwards became the petitioning creditor againß Havre and Stalin - tier. The Plaintiff being well advifed, found he could not fupport his claim of 6,0001., and, therefore, reduced the debt to t 1,67:1. which was the reach of his demand, including the lawful interell on his advances. Havre and Suth mier now continued etc frgar refining bufinefi, having made the of iignmer.t referred to, and having agreed to pay to the Plaintiff 14,c001. annually, by quarterly inflalments. The two firft infialments were punitually paid, but in the third they made de fault, and the Plaintiff being armed with the proper powers to this purpofe, took poffeffion of all their el feas,and threatened them with immediate de %ration. At that time the Defendants were creditors of Havre and Suthmier, to the amount of aoool. and if the pro perty were thus (wept away by the Defendants, they would not have received ts. for theia debt ; the De fendants therefore, on the pat tial information they re ceived, thought it prudent to take the effeas of Havre and Suthmier,and to give to the Plaintiff in exchange a bond for 00001. in the penalty of ifi,csool. The (port ground of the defence was on the faits here Ra ted, that the afp . gnment to the Plaintiff by Havre and Suthmier, was in the firft inflance an aft of bankrupt. cy, that therefore all the effeas were the property of the creditors of Havre and Suthmier, and that, there fore, he had nothing to alien to the Defendants to compote the confideration for this bond. The whole queßion turned upon the knowledge the Plaintiff had of the debt of Minton ; and on this trial the follow ing faits appeared referable to this cognizance, which were not adduced on the former occafion : 1. Suth mier depofcd to a converfation with the Plaintiff, in which he explicitly infort*ed Mr. Webb of the debt of Minton. z. In the books an entry of t 01. for the interelt of this debt was produced, with a double tick, or fymbol of examination by the Plaintiff. 3., An ac count was produced in the hand-writing of,the Plain tiff, in which this to!: fa paid for intereft- was Rated. After his Lordfltip had furnmed•up the evidence, at confiderable length, he Paid tli the whole (*it'll:in depended upon the fait, whether the,Plaintiff was ac e . quainted with the debt of Minton, or of any others, fufficient to contlit talc a petitioning creditor's debt, prior to May tRo4; %then the Defendant,, ‘,, T. deration for their bond, accepted the Inpv.ad 4 1 Ic: ation of the effeEti of Havre and Sutlon;er? The Foreman of the Jury, in delivesing the y rs dia for the Defendants, made a remark or. tt e pa . per we have alluded to, in the hand -writing ot s i„. Plaintiff, .which had cfcaped the vigilance of th, Learned Counfel. The debts of two persons, of th e names of Tuck and Pane, of which it h a d been that the Plaintiff was , WhollY ignorant, in this doru anent, appeared to be recpgnized under his own Arg.t. It is the object of moll men to acquire mane,, .and the prudent part of mankind endeavour t o tsiio •it•bor Such means as are attended with the fmallen rik The Scheme of the prefect Lottery idfords.asiopportunity of this nature, foi befidec ri, e ufual great and frpall.Prizes, a certain portion f the Blanks are entitled to rol. each, a circa -11, 11 , e . thighly advanvagyous to the adveuturer. The beauty of the Circaffian women has been rFet &sprite and admiration of all travelici s, and t: , „ have,been particular y praifed for the elroAnt f)n:rr. , ; try,and pearly whitener of their teeth. prefcn. lag them in this beautiful and healthy Elate, rh t i t country formates a peculiar vegetable produ6lio n , little known in any other quarter of the world. v hicit they asein the•hatrit•of conflantly ufing. it is !lis produaion which the Proprietor was fo fortunate to procure, hat forms the bath of Burt ER'S Rehla• tive Tooth Powder. To this article it owes its fu perior excellence and efficacy, over every other of the kind, in. imparting a fweetnefs to the bnath, gi s . ing a delicate coral rednefs to the gums, aid remov. log kiwi the teeth, swithont injury, all foul ,, el; and di(colomation, that tarni(hes the enamel. Ili% ra. luablppreparation is frld at Mr. Ylv-rts a's, No, 4 , Cheapfide, corner of Paternoller-row ; and may h e h a d o f ino it 1300k:fellers and perfumers, inevery cone. trylown, if boxes, at 2s. 9d. each. / - :,CCI..E.SIASTICA.I. PROMO Wigis7" -- The Lord BiLhop of B ath and Wrlfs has coll ate d t h e R ev. Warn Squire Studlit , A. s, to the valuAk vicarage of Chard, in Su nazdetflairc. _ _ The Rev. Herbert Randolph, vicar of Chute, Wilts, is premed to the cedar, of Lefton* &Set. Berks. MARRIED. Sunday, by Epecial*ence, at the IVlarqui, of Abereorn's kat, the Priory, thc Earl of Aberdeen to Lady Catherine Hamilton, bit Lordlbip's clack daughter. DIED. Oa the 2itlL it the Rookhar;Pinufe, Dedham, Eifel, in the tI th year of her age, Mifs Charlotte Catherine Finale, (mad daughter of Peter Firmin, Efq. Monday, at his honk in Bolton-roar, in the yid year of Rs age, the Right Hon. Walter, Lord AIL* of Forfar County. On the 25th June, in the prime afire, of a decline, at Limn s Cambridgefhire, where Mc came for a chant of str, Mrs, Ow, n wife of Edward Owcn, Eh". of St. John'. Calege, to the Uni realty of Cambildre. MGM WATER AT LONDON -BRIDGE TO NOV AOW . Mo - . - 36 minutes alter 7 40tVIK4 II HAVING dedicated myfeif to the Rudy, and beta gratified by the emit con2derablepradliee in that branch l ow pow co wet*, i trait that I have not mare =V MT time linnet thofe who. In the extiaifive Reid of the _ , am oceaf.onaily inenierfoi in uncertainty, and cumin always attain that Needs which is acquired by emeentrating the latelledual power to one dais of disorders The dif -a&s of DEBILITY are pectelhety diarrilisig for they bring with tiSent a train of concomitant fympoms, and, ky a d o . . velum of all vital energy, alliance Iddf becomes embittered... Whether they arik from the premier —a dill tsars*, tbedettrao. live habits of fehoolrhoys, or the indulgences of mateuty, they re- quire the molt affiluons proftffional MIN but by the ignorance of uneducated BM, the fymptnms are tt ierated, sad the cm* tattoo is Lonny's:s4 Asa ME 1.211411 E of the ROYAL COLLROEcf SURGEONS. 1 grcund my pretenfsoft en tegularity of educatiso; and policing every privilege to 'maim. I feel myfelf entitled to that confeiha:ts with which I haw !deficit° licei Gs liberally honoured. In the fent recitations at kcal weaknefs, early application vtill wool the calamity of a debilitated frame; but where the (of ferer, from a ormlcionlndi of the unreanlinefs of the vice which denied his misfortune, la fearful of the contempt or annum of tit family phyfielan and broods over his inlinnity with careful coo. edelment, it min be fattsfadiory for him to he affured not clay of capability of treatment, but alto of the molt inviolable feercey. And in recent Yeamtal Complaints it Is parable to prevun danger or diltrefs ; in the molt complicated cafes it is thl atone. merit of exclufive experience In this line to died a fee, deeds. and fpeedy goiiitabmene. 1 odor the ado:nit:Age of this experience to thole of either fez who are sOidted with any hind of DEBILITY, of any Imposes at INFECIION, and in ail cafes the terms of ramp aeration are Stated on the Brit interview. Patleetain the country are expeBnd to Indere* Beak mom aa4 ate re:lncited to !pacify their age and meaner o: Living . IVIA2:1114 MU, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons Is Loam No so Arundel-treat. Strand, yea i•mole mar To THOS. TAYLOR, IA. No. q, New BridgeAr t et, L oo dt,a SIR —I confider it but an ati of justice du e t o the merits of your LEAKE's PATENV PILLS, to commui•i cate to you the following Cure, which has recently been performed by them :--An acquaintance of mine, who by the breaking , nit of an old Venereal Complaint (attended by a Complication of DA orders arifing therefrom), was reduced aimed to a necletan, tad the: gh he bad the brit medical advice which could be obtained, and ti teal a variety of patent medicines, nothing could be procured which feenretto fuislus cafe, or to do him any fervice ; he remain ed in a Atoll reduced and pitiable Situation for two years. unable to follow his profelEun, and fcarcely able to walk or even to !land oa his legs; in fad, no one who knew him ever fuppofed it rffible for him to recover. He was 2dt/ire:if at lilt to try your I.EAKE ' s Pll.l.s—be did fu, ftrielly adhering to the direCtious given them—lie hail not taken more than two boxes. before be Snood ao altetation fur the better : thia encourated him to proceed. an ! titling a few boxes more lie found hi. appetbe and strength brat:• ally return, and is now as healthy and as flout as any ma.. homy. You are welcome, Sir, to refer any perfun to me fur a coarmation of the above account if it fliould be doubted. I aers, Sir, your ebedient humble fervent, I.ibrary, Fulitlione, July so, 580 s. T HO. PURDY. Prepared and fold by the foie Proprietor THOL TAYLOR, Metaber of the Royal Collett,: of Surgeons, Leo dote, at hie bottle, No. 9, New Bridge , Street; Where, after a condant refidence of more than ao years. practice particularly direCted to the cure of Ventral coutpl. and thole incidental to the parts of generation in both f4,4a, that inviolable Secrecy which men of his prof, !lion Ciould obferve, be flatters himfelf Coe advice and aflift Mier he gratuito;Ls admioilters to perfuns taking this medicine, will be eacemol, ly a difcerning public, as an advantage Seldom to be obtained, a'n void of ambiguity. Ally fold, by his appointment, for the convenience of there r , ing at a dilLance, at the Perfumer's, No. 35, St. AlSaii's firot.P .4l Mall; the Toyihop, t 3, Oxford-ftreet ; Mr. Ditborotigb, 7, fel Itreet-itill; Mr. Baxter's. South- bridge, Edinburgh ; Mr krila nald's, Glafgow ; Dublin ; Mr.Billii.ge's, Mr. Atkinton's, Manclietter, and by sae perron in every coofi detaWe town in Great Britain aid Ireland, in boxes of umly as 9.1 each, fea)cd up with full and plain din dims, whereby panes 0. either fen may cure thenifelves with eale,.fpied, Secrecy, and Carr:. N.B. Every Box (oldie' Great Britain is Crated ty with a iteu , ? on which, by favour of the Conimillltmers, is printed at the bra-- Office—.T. Tayler, No. 9, l'iloaralisidge Street.—to imitate nt;o11+ ,felquhaprj all others are eauoterfeit. LONDON : Printed and . 1411601 by LEVEL KF74IT (5 terhuty-pbce Lambeth ), at the S 1 az °Fr.(' k, Ns. !,9 Amt. Y1114;60111(9 at the Sum Ott ics, 6:2 004W'