Star. — London, England, 1818-03-21 00:00:00

arrival in England witness often corresponded with Mr. Wilkins, and who was now at Horsham. ' Mr. Yates, clerk to Mr. Evans, solicitor to the prosecution, proved the acknowledgment of the pri soner, that she was married to Mr. Walton whilst Mr. Wilkins was living. Ikre the case for the prosecution closed. The COMMON SEILTRANT and Mr. CHITTY then submitted two objections to the form of the indict . menu :--1 st. That there was not a sufficient renue set out as to the first marriage stated in the indictment, inasmuch as it simply said " at Bombay, in the East Indies," whereas it ought to have gone on with a scilicet " to wit, at Cheapside, in the city of London," in the usual form, so as to give the Court jurisdiction. '-3d. That there was a variance between the indict meilt and the registry of the second marriage. In the former it stated the marriage to have been cele brated " at the Parish of St. Peter and St. Mary," whereas the registry described the parish to be Saint Peter's (with au s) and St. Mary. These objections, they submitted, were fatal to the indictment. Mr. Baron dRAII.I.NI thought the objections not tenable, and they were consequently over-ruled. The Prisoner heing called upon for her defence, said, that after her arrival in England, Mr. Wilkins and herself v.ere separated, and she did not see him for three years. She then saw him in Lond n. Pre viously to that she was told that he had married a second wife—a Jewess. She was also told, that her marriage in India was not lawful, there being no witnesses present at the ceremony. but the clergy man and the clerk. When Mr. - Walton raid his ad dresses to her, silt, told him of her marriage in India, and remonstrated with him upon the impropriety of persevering. She had his own hand-writing to chew that he was well acquainted with her situation.— When Mr. Gates, the Attorney's Clerk, came to her in prison, he told her that no punishment would be inflicted upon her, and that the only object of the prosecution was to bring about a separation. She had never made any secret of her marriage with Mr. Wilkins, and having been informed that it was not valid for want of witnesses, she did not consider it binding. Mr. Walton was made acquainted with every circumstance of her situation, and it was only after repeated i:nportunities that she consented to marry hini. The Rev. Robert James Carr was examined on behalf of the Prisoner, who stated, that Mr. Walton had made application to him for a license. Being confined to his house at the time, he requested Mr. Walton to call in a day or two, during which period the Reverend Clergyman requested his Curate to make inquiries respecting the Lady. Upon Mr. Walton's second application, the witness declined granting a license, and with the greatest considera tion of kindness, begged of him to recollect the un-, happiness he would give to his mother by marrying• this Lady. Mr. Walton was determined to obtain a, license elsewhere, which, the Reverend witness obH served, had he been aware, he would have prevented by giving information of the circumstances of she objection for his refusal. The Learned Judge summed up the evidence with much force and perspicuity, and pointing out the facts to the attention of the Jury, he left it to their consideration to give a verdict accordingly. The Jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict of Guilty, but recommended the prisoner to mercy. . . The Learred Judge, in passing sentence, observed to the prisoner, that from the frank and open manner in which she declared her situation to Mr. Walton, as being previously married, and which was partly proved in evidence, the crime with which she was charged was much extenuated, and that she would be visited with the least punishment the law in such cases had provided. The sentence was, six months confinement in the House of of Correction at Lewes, and that it should be attended with as gentle treat-, meat as war suitable to her situation. CHARGE OF CRINI. CON. MUSKETT V. GURNEY.-(SPECIAL JURY.) This was an action brought by the Plaintiff, J. S. Muskets, Esq. of Intwood, against Richard lianbury Gurney, Esq. for crier. con. with the Plaintin wife. The proceedings being opened by Mr. Sruatis, Mr. GURNEY, in a long and able speech to the Jury, set forth the blackness of the crime with which the Defendant was charged, and the injury the Plain-; tiff had sustained by the seduction of a wife in whom all his of happiness were placed. Mr. Mus kett's situation in life was such as gave him every assurance of a happy future, till the occurrence of the unfortunate circumstance then before the Court. The Learned Counsel then descanted on the nature of the evidence he should produce ; it was, indeed, but circumstantial, and the Defendant had flattered himself that no evidence could be produced strong enough to convict him ; he (the Learned Counsel) trusted the decision of the Court would prove it was but flattery, fur he would produce such circumstances to the Court, as, he trusted, would prove the case so strongly that no man could lay his hand on his heart and say a criminal intercourse had not passed between the parties. He knew that his Learned and excellent Friend would do all that could be done on the part of the Defendant, but when he had proved his case, he knew not m hat answer could be made by the Defendant. Mr. Gurney knew his Learned Friend would not give him the opportunity of replying, and therefore he rested his case in th e h an d s o f the Learn ed and experienced Judge, whose knowledge of the law, of the polession, and of the world, was most profound. On the subject of damages he should say nothing; even if the Jury wove the whole damages, it would scarcely amount to a year's income, but it would be the only recompence they had it in their power to make to the Plaintiff. Mr. Gurney ex :oiled the conduct of the man who openly elopes with :he adultress, when placed in c“rnparison with the secret seducer, who, under the mask of friendship, works the ruin of his friend's wife. He trusted the Jury would give some compensation to the injured husband, under this greatest possible aggravation of the offence, and show by their verdict that the purity of domestic peace was not to be violated with im punity. The Learned Counsel then proceeded to call witnesses, who proved the marriage and the terms of reciprocal affection in which Plaintiff an d his wife had lived previous to the discovery of the connexion which subsisted between Mrs. Muskett and the Defendant.—Alter hearing three witnesse s , Illr. Setjeant VAPGIN N addressed the Jury at great length, and commented strongly on the evi_l dente which had been prodtked before them, and which he contended would, if carried to its utino.l me.using, only prove that an improper familiarity had subsisted between the Defendant and 'Mrs. Mus kett. lie wished to impress on their minds that the question for them to try was, whether or not the act of adultery had been committed? not to try the pre vious stages of the proceedings ; whether there was more or Less levity in the conduct of the parties, or whether these was a wowing attachment which might have ripened into love. The Jury were nut to inquire whether the intercourse between the par ties might have ripened into illicit intercourse, but whether it had arrived at its cousurnmation ? He trusted the Jury would discard from their minds all that they had heard out of doors, and take the evi dence as it stood before them. On the subject of , damages he should say nothing. The Learned Judge then summed up the evidence with great impartiality. He expressed his opinion to be, that no criminality had subsisted between the parties, though he considered the conduct of the De fendant as improper and reprehensible. Inc Jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict for the Defendant. I ' I . --- = -..........-.....-......- MAN AS HE IS TOO OFTEN. What sinks the female soel in woe, In friendships guise a deadly foe, Say who can cause the bitterest throe? Ms Man. • ' • When unsuspecting young and gay, When peace and pleasure lead the way, Who'll tempt a simple girl to stray? 'Tis Man. 2 I When llyhla's honey seems to flow 1 In sweetest accents soft and low, Who watches then to give the blow? i 'Tits Man. When lost in virtue, sunk in shame, When venum'd scandal taints her name, 1 / Who then will clear himself from shame? 'Tis Man. And when her woe-worn heart is broke, When e'en in death his name she spoke, In that sad hour who'll laugh and joke 'Tis Man. ißut oh ! when death's unerring dart / . Shall stop the life-throb of his heart, / Say then who feels his conscience smart? Base Man. The fluttering pulse, the silent tear, The quivering voice proclaim death near, Remorse shall then thy bosom tear, Oh! Man. am-- --- • . 1 ASSIZES. SUSSEX.—CIIARGE OF BIGAMY. Thursday morning the Courthouse, at Horsham, * was excessively crowded with Ladies and Gentlemen, to hear this interesting trial. Before eight o'clock, Maria Walton, alias Maria friiking, was put in the prisoner's box : she was dressed in white, with a light coloured pelisse, and wore a round black hat with i • feathers, and a black veil. Her countenance was • exceedingly prepossessing, notwithstanding the natu- ral anxiety of her feelings upon the situation in \OIL li she was placed. A few minutes after eight, Mr. Baron GRAIIANI entered the Court, and Mr. GURNEY (special Counsel), and Mr. BOLLAND, both for the prosecution; as also Mr. NOLAN and Mr. CHITTY, Counsel for the prisoner. After the indictment had been read, to which the prisoner pleaded Not Guilty, and was allowed the privilege of a seat, ' . Mr. GURNEY stated the case to the Ju"v. The prisoner was the daughter of a respectable tradesman i at Weymouth, and had been married to an Officer in the Army, named Cut, with whom she proceeded to Bombay, in the East Indies. Ensign Cox having died in 1802, in the year ItUO the prisoner married a Gentleman in the East India Company's service, named Wilkins, and with that Gentleman she re- . tamed to England. For reasons not now necessary to state, the prisoner and her husband separated. In the year Ihl6, she was residing at Brighton, and there attracted considerable notice, particularly of ll • : 1 the Gentlemen of the Army, by her personal attrac- tions, her accomplishments, and her style of living. Mr. Walton, a very young Gentleman, a native of , 1 Barbadoes, who had been sent over to this country by his mother, a respectable Lady of fortune, had ,-* f entered into the army at an early age, and was then quartered with his Regiment at Brighton. He be- came acquainted with the prisoner—was smitten with her charms, and in the result, they were married ' I The prisoner was married by the name of Maria Cox, irepresenting to Mr. Walton, that she was the widow of Mr. Cox. The marriage WAS solemnized at Lewes; they lived together for a short time, and shortly al- terwards Mr. Walton discovered that his connection with the prisoner threat him into the greatest pecu- niary difficulties. He was arrested for debts con- tracted by her, and doomed to a jail. Mrs. Walton, thought it proper, under all the circumstances of the • case, to institute the present prosecution. The two • I marriages would be proved beyond all doubt, as would . Iso the fact of Mr. Wilkins, the second hus- band, being still alive. Indeed there would be no doubt that Mr. Wilkins was living at this moment, t - because the same Gentleman had received letters from him, dated Clonmel, in behind, since he had been , . in thic town, announcing his intention of coming to England, and down to the very hour of thi s trial, his arrival was expected. The prosecution was car- ried on by the mother of the young man, who, though his prudence in this transaction could not be much praised, yet as a soldier he was entitled to f . every commendation. In the field of honour he had greatly distinguished himself; he had shared in the laurels of Waterloo. The Jury, under the circum- -1 ' stances of the case, must feel it their duty to pro- f nounce a verdict of guilty. Mr. Maitland, clerk of the Secretary's office at the India house, produced the book of registers of mar- riages, births, and deaths, at Bombay, commencing . the 14th of January to the 19th of December, 1810. • The Bev. Mr. Burroughs stated, that he was a re- sident Chaplain at Bombay 42 years ; every marriage is registered at the church, and copies are regularly transmitted to England, after they are compared f rom the original register book, signed by the cler- gyman. The prisoner was married to James Thomas Racket Wilkins, by him, on the 26th of January, • 1810. They left Bombay soon afterwards. Witness had not seen the prisoner until he had an interview with her in Bristol jail, where she was confined for want of sureties to keep the peace towards Mr. Wal- ton's mother. This was about three weeks ago. He knew the prisoner well at this interview, notwith- ! standiag the length of time which had elapsed since I y observations ! the marriage at Bombay, owing to the celebrity of her character, and the observations he made at th e Pltime as to her person. This was further corroborated I from the conversation he held Nvith the prisoner at that time, when she recognized bins. There were no subscribing witnesses to the marriage at Bombay, which was by license. i Mr. NVinter, the parish clerk of St. Peter's, Lewes, iil produced•the register of the marziage at that parish I t I church, namely, ‘, Robert Baron Walton, of the pa. rish of Brighton, and Maria Cox, of the parish of Lewes, by license, 28th of May, 1816." The witness • was present at the solemnization. Mrs. Brierly, of the Pelham Arms, Lewes, was also present at the marriage. Mr. Bampfield, surgeon, of Bedford -street, Co- : tvent -garden, knew the prisoner, and her deceased 4 husband,-Mr. Cox, in Bombay, and subseque n tly h er second husband, Mr. Wilkins, who introduced the printer to him as his wife. They resided at . Boni- hay till June, 1810, when they sailed for England. Witness left India in the same fleet, and since their., • . , 0.: • / t‘.!.% • v , vr, • ' 1•" s„ ;.,,.. . I"''' • . ... - - PARKER V. BILLING. This was an action of replevin. There were seve ral issues on the record—the only question for the consideration of the Jitry was—Whether a person to whom land is allotted, has Fufficient authority in the land to distrain, the award not being made. On this point a verdict, by the direction or the Learned Judge, was given for the Defendant, with liberty for the Plaintiff to state a case to the Court above. BurcitEß V. WIIEATLEY. Verdict by consent for Plaintiff. Damages 1,2001. subject to a reference. SICKLEMORE V. THISLETON. An action for breach of covenants in a lease. Ver. diet for Plaintiff by consent, for 20/. SALISBURY. . A most interesting trial took place at our Assizes, which was that of Mr. Mania.; Tuck, brewer, of Swindon, for the high crime of forgery. It appeared that Mi. Tuck was in partnership with Mr. Shep herd, at Swindon, and that they carried on business as brewers and wine-merchants. Roger Coale, the prosecutor, was examined : he stated that he had kept a public-house at Swindon, and dealt with Tuck and Shepherd fur beer and spi rits. There was a running, account between them, kept in a small book, in which was entered the beer and spirits delivered to Coale, and on the opposite leaf (the credit side) the cash paid at different times by Coale to Tuck. This book remained in the pos session of Coale; and when goods were received by Coale, or cash paid by him to Tuck, the book was taken, and the entry made. On comparing books, however, it appeared that in the 1813 account a pay ment of SOl. had been made, and credit given to Coale for 501. and in another place, that a payment of 201. had been made, and credit given for 40/. Tuck mentioned the mistake to him ; the figure 5 was erased, and a 3 substituted in its place ; the 4 was also taken out, and a 2 put in, making the sums in the account according to the monies paid. These' alterations were made with the knowledge and ap probation of Coale ; for the credit account, as dimi nished, was carried on, from page to page, till finally balanced and settled by Coale, in February, 1814. Another account then commenced between the parties, in which no mistake occurred but one, which was, that Coale, forgot to settle it. 1 -For this'he was sued by Messrs. Tuck and Shepherd, and they obtained a verdict for the full amount at the last summer Assizes. On the next day he prefmed a bill of indictment against Tuck, for forging or alter ing the 5 into a 3, turning the 50/. into AK.; another indictment for altering the 4 into a 2, turning the 401. into 201.; and to make " assurance double sure' he preferred another against him for a fraud. He succeeded in persuading the Grand Jury that the sums so changed belonged to the current account, and were a part of the monies for which a verdict had been obtained. On this Mr. Tuck was appre hended for forgery, but bailed by the Judge. Coale was afterwards taken in execution, and removed to the Fleet-prison, from whence he was now brought at the expense of Tuck, by a writ of HaLeas Corpus. to substantiate his charge against him. The evidence of Coale, the prosecutor, himself, and the overpower ing testimony of the account-book (which was ba lanced after the Aged forgery was committed) were so strong, that the Judge gave a decided opinion, the prosecutor's Counsel threw up their briefs, and the Jury hon,2urably acquitted Mr. Tuck on all three in dictments. Strjeant lieu. applied on behalf of Mr. Tuck for copies of the indictmeats, on which to ground future proceedings against Coale, and the Judge immediately ordered them. Coale retired in the custody of the officer who brought him frAii London. LIMERICK, NLVRCII 11.—The bodies of .I. Dillane, a respectable farmer, his sister, the widow Costelloe, and her daughter, were found murdered on the lands of Knocklenid), Barony of Upper Coenelloe, in this county, on Monday last. It appears that these un forturaate persons were - at the market of Newcastle, on Saturday se'nnight, and after disposing of some pigs, were returning home, waylaid and murdered ; and from that time, though diligent search was made, no clue could possibly be had to ascertain their fate until Monday last, when they were found as thus described, in an unfrequented pal t of a moun tain road. It is clear that robbery was not the ob ject of the murderers, as all the money which the de ceased persons received at the market was found on them. The motive of so dreadful an outrage can oi.iy be ascribed to revenge, as it is said that the NviJ,,w Costelloe, at our last Assizes, very properly prosecu ted two persons for cow-stealing, who Wen.? convicted. An Inquest l a ss been held on the bodies, and a wet diet of NVilful Murder returned against persons un known. The necks of the unfortunate sufferers were broken, and their bodies not only had the appearance of violence, but parts of them were mutilated. mcious OUTRAGE.—On the night. of the 10th lint. a most wanton and malicious outrage was com nntted at the wood of Allen, in the Barony of Con nell, and county of Kildare: Tsvb horses, the pio perty, tf a man n.:med Patrick Byri.e, and a widow or die name of Kilroy, were killed, by cuttinL off the he id cf one, 2 1 . d cutt i ng t h e t h roat of the other in two places. The tails o f two pr.vs, bel ong i ng to the same'per ions, .WCI . O cut off 'o'll'tlie *same night. THE MA Rxr•rs. N6VI'OATE Asio I.F.ADENHALL MARKLTsi, (I.ly the Curca , t .) Bert— Ss 4d to 4s 4d Veal Mutton -is 44 to Ss Od I Pork ........ PRICES or HAY A go STRAW TF:S . 1.4-41 S'S. U lf P. Hay ...31 lOs 4.4t1 to CI OS WI u b St,ax sl 14s Od to 31 Ss Cd I S t raw 21 lir Clover 41 4s Od to CI Os Od Clover 61 61 PRICE OF HOPS:— WIRW BA OS. Kent -21 us to 241 10s Sussex Os to :Ai a, Este: Uul os to UV' Si, SO.IP, ,•0 C Town T illoo l'elicw Rossi; N ~ .ite ditto So.p ditto 110,--Ct.rd, 1 i 6d—Mould., RAW lIIDFS. Zest lltifert and Steers (per Orcif -1; ' .. 5t011t......2: 61.1 to 3s Od Marktt Cap: Middlings ...'s 4d to 2a Gd Eng. horse Sheepskins—Polli.d, 9s Gd to 12s 4d—Down• Shear/ills, us oil to Os Cd—LanThs, us , PRICE Or LEATHER. Rutty, 50 to 56Ibs each VA to :: e x. ... Ditto, ;6 to 661bs each . --d t-, =rd Dressing Elides 16.1 to , i4I Fine I'oach Hide, 16,1 t: IA Crop hides, 33 to 4t16, or ct:.:irg Dire 43 to ZOibi 1'..1 to Lld Cal( Skins, 30 to 4011 'nd to ::.4 Ditto 50 to 701 b) — ,l t“ •A Ditto 70 to BtAlos :X4 to 744 Small Seals (Greenland) iiid no 17c1 Large ditto per dozen '."Cs to ,e,..: 1 Tanned llorse Hides 134 to 174 Spanish If orte Hides I id to f. ..I 7.! 5U1..(11 rA,CI Farnhasc PRICE or TALLOW, St. J.une•'., M:aic , -t 4: al Cia. re Market— os (A.l Whittchapel 31arket 46 5:1 (per stone of sib; Yellow Soup, 100s—Mottled, Candles, per due. 12s ('Of•\TRV : 1 1.111KETS- P wevav, March I t+.—Wheat, As s d to II s Ed—^, to 9s 6d—Vetches, oos Od per bushe4-13:•rk , ',7.11: —Oats, '2Bs OS to 40s GS per qt:Prter—lirsa,i, peck—Flour, Cs, to ccs per sack. OIFORT, March 19—The price of a MAO rf WI- • :4 —The Quaetern Loaf, Wheaten, Is d.—/ I. , NEwsuar, Bs.a2s, .11I.ach 19.—Whe;:t, to , 35s to 52s—Oats, 40s to 425-13rans, .u. to Cis—:tt,,, to 66s.—Bread, Is II sd to 21 1 d. per (.21,r.. Ussanacr, March 19.-..Wltt.at, pvr load, .Cl 2 o. :c Barley, per quarter, 35s to L'Ot—ea:•, •4s to iGs to 56s—i'eas, 441 to 52*—nye, 1)1!4 to PRICES OF GI Portugal Gold in Coin, pt Fore!gn Gold In Rare New Doubloons ..... . New Dollars. . Silver in Bars ..... it 4,1 Et VESTfit irl!!11.0:11 tPL4, Gi t 21 : 4 n tit id t vtgg- • • t ., • •••=:1 c, to ' s, ki te 'S C ,110 w ..... : S I ittu........ 0 .......... ...** ( t . tdg 14 64 •••'s su ::1:c, td It rig (Ir.: • - JWne (.; • • 1 $ u. C: 4 r.r.. ••..2zd to . • • ••••-ti =rd ...16.1 to _Asti t: 1 - 4 19d to IPI l'•. to Lld ••••(11 to ,t 1 ce 17d n '."Cs to ...IA to 174 ...lid to EIS. .11. ILD AND s►r.vrx. COURSE OF Amsterdam 36 10 B. 2U. 'Ditto at sight 36 4 Amsterdam ll 6 C.F. Ditto at sight ll Rotterdam... ll 7 2U. Antwerp, ez-mo 11 9 Harnburgh... l4 2 24U. Altutia ........ 34 3 2 it. 7. Paris, 3 day's date 44 10 Ditto 24 30 2U. Bourdeauz do. 24 30 Prank fort on the Maine 142 ea-mo. Madrid, effective 40 New Louis each ......... ... r3diz effect 394 Barcelona £4 : 0 4 1 4 4 ! O 5 f F.NCHANC; Pi,boz. rift..:;:ve Cibra!tar.. ..... I.e;:horn Cenci , Verice 1:v t' 4 ...... NLrks NAILS Dublin 1 _.O Waterford 0 1 Guernsey and Jersey 0 1 Holland 1 0 Gottenburigh 0 0 Flanders 1 0 Palermo Liibo❑ 0p,r.0 Ri'.izcira Dt.blin Cot k... ..... 43 rid 0 NT et. c Agio f Cz.r.k on Ii 2 et ( r.r. IS DAN. Att. Ve, Lisboa s Malta e France v I liainhurgh C Brazils Let.ol r d Islt.nds 0 BIRTH. Friday se'nnight, at Nosel7-6.,11, of Sir Arthur Grey Haalerigg, Bart. of a tan. MARRIED. Saturday, at Dublin, thCil. - 4;:CoTcr.vCcne, tld,st sr e Coolly Coane, Esq. of Bath, to Alicia trances, eidend4ast of Henry Charles Sirr, F.sq. of Dublin Castle. DIED. Wednesday, at Paddington, Robe rt Gardner, F.sq. March 13, at No. 94, Strand, Lieut. Charles Matbail, la of the 42d Regiment, or Royal Ilighanders, at a prausatil uess from wounds which he received at tin blab of i' , .!ve March 8, •at Roscommon, on his Circuit, Jams WlL:ezza Esq. one of his M.p:sty's Counsel at L;.w. Monday, aged 70, Welter Ruding, Esq. of Wist:itss.tsz Leicester. Mr. R. had retired to rest at hie acct.:tom,: !..ar, in hi, usual good state of health, after at:ending divas gra tisk.: in the course of the day ; but about four o'du.k ing morning, he was seized with an apoplectic fit, and apia••• NVe feel pleasure in publishing the fJllowinglece. As transmitted to us, in confirmation of a paravia which appeared in our Paper, relative to the C' that general and dangerous complaint Rupture: TA THE EDITOR OF THE STIR- Sra—Obierving a paragraph in your Parer re•pect;rithic - t of an I lernia, performed of a tarp,. size ; be fte Me:Oa at Charlotte noose, Great Charlotte-6treet. Blickfria:i E:il. .1 justice, Sir, to Nlts,ri. COOPER and Co. I het to , • I `i perroimil testimony. Having been afflicted mule :vent?' ri and deemed incurable by eminent Surgeons, I pr , nilf affliction, expecting every hour to be my last; I al M;`" plied to the Medical Board, and have reason to pray for th.t excellent Establishment, for although I ant mule 7'; fectly cured In a few weeks, and now, tha::k • health.—l think, Mr. Editor, all who kruw rt. • I car have no other motive for this communicati benefit.—l am, Sir, yorr obedient Srryort Deg and Stile, near London -road, Sr.. tkor;,%'s Fields, October lilt -. ~, ~, :u LLPILA`a . FOR THE GRAVEL AND %ToNr., LT:Nry").), H ICK:VAN% PILLS are ail.m.ed to hr - successful Medici^e ever discoverod tor rife:v.. leg, and previrtiting the future recurrence of all th. which ari-c from an imperfect action of rht Cr. Gravel and Stone, Lumbago, Pains is !Lek L pression of Urine. It combine: w fluid, dissolves and entirely carries aavay the gritty r formtd, and prevents its :*ltt.re forma - tan, be ..trin• nerally the while Ut - inai.y Sy:tem : deliver. - patient from the excroci.:tiie tortm - cs of :how violence or intiry to the Cim....itmion. • These Pali- are composed of :he nwAt innocent irT rcy:irt canria,incLt nor rein ait.t of diet dune No greater recommendation can be oared of fact of their having r0. , ....ked for many reputation that ha. ever been acelnirett t y ace particular the countemuice and approbation of 1114 Faculty. D. "c'." ~:~~~ tLr•DS o• :IL-Q.4 the •' &Id in hoxtat 91. and 11s. Sy th. Pr , 7ri:t +r ' • men?) by BUIL! Al and Sor.c, Chenn-:, c,,tncr of St. Vaunt ('harsh-card,' Lothin:!, a-,! villt -street. Du 1 ,11.1; also by the Venders of 'lcd•....a. 11 . c.tx n i n the Kingdcm. - - HIGH WATER at LONDON lOG 1'0.1101:L' 1 W Morning to! Afternoon - £ 4 ..---- LONDISS and rievc: Temp le- Ikr.