Star. — London, England, 1828-01-26 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANORRY, J•a. es. The Court was occupied in partly bearing the argu menu of Counsel in appeal cases, until half•past two o'clock, when it row. STEVENS AND GUPPY. Mr. ROMILLY applied, at the rising of the Court, to request that the Lord Chancellor would give judgment in this case. He was instructed to say, that great dis tress and agony of mind had been endured by the par ties. owing to the delay which bad hitherrolaken place, and its express his clients' hopes that his Lordship, by a prompt decision, would relieve them from the misery of their sit uation. His LORDSHIP promised judgment at a very early day. VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Jas. 25. ACE SL L D. THOMPSON. In this case the plaintiff is the publisher of a Sunday newspaper called the Jehw Bull, and the defendant is an artist. In the last exhibition at Somerset House, the defendant exhibited a fall length portrait of the King. Ars article. appeared in . the, John Bull newspaper, in which. this portrait was - severely criticised, and Mr. Thompson charged with deceit and misconduct. The article complained of was not read; bui, from what we could gather, it appeared that Mr. Thompson, having obtained permission to sketch the bust of the King, in order to put. it among other figures in an historical picture t the subject of which was the " King's Landing' stkircland,* was charged in the plaintiff's newspaper wt having added the - remainder of the figure, and, painting a separate portrait, with having deceived the publiciato an opinion that he had obtained his Ma lesty's,permission.to paint his portrait in this manner. Mr. Thompson brought an action against the plaintiff in consequence of this article; and the plaintiff, in tending to justify, filed a bill of discovery against Mr. Thompson in this Court, in order to obtain evidence in support of his justification. Under these circumstances, Ms. WAKEFIELD : now moved for an injunction to restrain Mr: Thompson from proceeding in his action at law until be had put in his answer to the bill filed by the plaintiff. • The VICE CHANCELLOR having understood that notice of this application. had been given to the other side,, granted the injunction. . COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Wansmnis, JAN. 25. This being the Anniversary of the Converson of St. Paul...the Judges appeared in their scarlet robes. Lord Teynharn. sat on the Bench. by the side of Mr. Justice Dimas during the greater part of the day. • MANDAMUS& The COMMON SINOSANT applied to the Court for a rule tashevecause why a oraNdennsis should not be issued, directed.•to the Bishop of Rochester, to institute the Rev: Walter King to a prebend in that Cathedral.— The• Learned Counsel stated that the See of Rochester had:been incorporated, by. charter, in the reign of Henry VilLand Mr. King had been appointed archdeacon of the .diocese during the lifetime of his father, the late Bishop. • The prebend. was appurtenant to the Atch deaconry, a union having been made, by letters patent, in the yesr 1637. After the decease of the late Bishop, the Lord Chance;'or, under a supposition that the pre .bend was vacant, had presented to it a Gentleman con vected, witb the University of Cambridge. • Lord Tietreanets suggested whether the matter mighi • cot be tried by lucre impedit. -The Common SEKGRANT thought it could not. The -right of patronage was now claimed by the Crown, and the Lord Chancellor,,acting fur his Majesty, had made a . presentation to the Prebend, which it was now,sought io vacate, on the ground that since the union of the •Prebend with the Atchdeaconry, the Crown bad no right of reientaticar. • lamd.Testrattsparr inquired .whether the title could i to!.bp tried by some form of real action? I:he COMAION SEarkgva said be thought nor. The p..tr t blet• t had been tomtit* . considered, and no remedy but that which was now sought could be devised. for restoring things to their former footing.. 51,r. Justice( BAYLEY suggested whether the archdea con snight.am,preserst binasilf to the prebend. . The Cameos+ Bsitoaawr said, it bad been found that the archdeacon had no power to present either himself orany' other pascal— Lord TtaTERDin obstkved, that a mandamus wad Tatter in-unusual remedy for such a put pole as this. The COMMON SERGEANT said there was a precedent for kin one .instance with reapect to ibis very Cathe dral. The Learned Counsel traen rtferred to a caie in Barnardiston, in which a mandamus had been i ssued to` compel institution to a prebend. He said an examina hacl been made with a view to see whither any ftnm of teal action would furnish a remedy in this case, but as. here the Crown was a parry against the Crown, flambee mode than a mandamus could be devised: The Couttr at length granted the rule. BRENT V. FISHER. • - This leis an action against- several inhabitants of the town if Cambridge, to try the question whether the Gptpssvasioe of Cambrifige have a tight to certain tolls 4:l4ivised by theift? The cause was tried at the sittings aker Lot Michaelmas Term, before Lord Tenterdee, whew ta-verdict u as found for the plaintiff, establishing thwright- Of the . Corporation to the tolls in question. - rite ATTOINEY.6ISNERAL now applied for a rule to -slum cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a.mreetttithad . ,.rm the ground that the verdict was against4he wei ght of evidence, and the Learned Judge 4seal.tort one point hais4irected the Jury. The Learned Omostl at/vetted shortly to the principal facts given in revidessce on the trial i .a.full detail of which we gave at' the tune, and. be contended that the evidence against 41.14;4 set up by the corporation preponderated in l at toor ui the slefenslatrs, . word TOFtgiants aaid.tbere was certainly sufficient s groundsto induce the Court to wish that the matter should r der go furife r ni granted. TON ICING V. TH MAYOR AND CORPORATION OP , , •. , DOKASTER. . 'ibis Will rult,, calling upon the Mayor and Car potation at nisicittor -to stew cause wit, a writ of wee ,ainends should;-notissue, directing them to admit as a fret**, of. that borough a person of the name of Bucklartd, who xlaimed his freedoms from having been articled for seven years w a Gentleman of the name of Mason, au attorney, in the town of auscasterd • The.bructroa Gewrent. (with whom.was Mr. PAT" KESOS) stow appearei to sheetwse against the rule. fk oh.errecl • that . the only question, was, whether a custom, which existed in. the .booktikh of Doncaster, entitling any person who had served.an apptenticeship co seven years to a trade, tu be idethted so the freedom at the borough, crania. be. eatended. to the ra i se of 4 clerk articled - to an attorney for seven years? Us applicant, in the raw* case,.who bad served a regular de/ki t h+ p Doncaster, had been vefused admission to the free . . Om of the bproegh, on the ground that he heti .not heenapprenticed to a trade, but to a.profeision, which Ancona', %tidos the custom of the borough. He has not sheen any instinces in which a person articled to an attorney or aoy other profession bad been ad mitted to the treed Ons of- the borough, and no by-law was found to exist which gave the right to such admix. lion. In many of the old corporations which were instituted for the purposes of trade, mention was made of several fraternities -or guil ds of tra d e, but there was, no mention of a guild or fraternity of attorneys; and the records of the borough of Doncaster spewed many. instances in which persons had been refused the freedom of the borough, because they had not been.apprenticed to a trade. The short question therefore was, whether an attorney was to be considered as a person in trade, according to the general meaning of that term? After a few words from the ATTORNEY GENERAL in' support of the rule, . , Lord TENTERDEN said, it was quite Clear that this' could not be considered as an aporeaticeship to a trade. In some cases it would be difficult to say what was and what was not a trade, but there could be no difficulty in saying that an attorney was not a trader. Buie discharged with costs. THE KING V. JAMES BROWN, RSQ. The ATTORNEY GENERAL (with whom was Mr. At.- Daimon) appeared to show cause against a quje .ob tained last Term, at the instance of Sir Wm. Brabazon, High Sheriff of the county of Mayo, calving upon the defendant to shew cause why a criminal information should not be filed against him, for the publication of a libel. The Learned Counsetiobservad, that the alleged libel was in the form of a speech, purporting to have been delivered by Mr. Brown, in his place in Parlia ment. A considerable portion of the affidavits filed on , applying for the rule, consisted in details, for the pur pose of shewing that Mr. Brown was the author of the, alleged libellous speech. He, however , would at once „Admit Mr. Brown to be the author of the matter corn plained of, and would avow also that itlr. Brown had sent it for publication to a London paper; and having done so, be would now proceed to shew that Air. Brown was fully 'justified- in making the statements contained in his speech, ur, at all events, that , . Sir William Brabazon was not entitled to the extra ordinary interposition of the Court, which, by the present rule, he sought to obtain, but must be left to the ordinary remedy of action or indictment.— The Learned Counsel then proceeded to read the speech from a Morning Paper which he held in his hand; it was of considerable length , and commenced by observing that men invested with low power should be prevented from inflicting on society the greatest crime known to the law, and that there were men now at large who had entered into a conspiracy to commit such a crime. • It then went on to state, in substance, that at the election for the county of Mayo in June last, Lord Bingham and the defendant were candidates; that the• defendant, for the purpose of preventing a tumult taking place after the election, hid declined being chaired, but that, as he and some of his friends 'were proceeding opt of the town of Castlebar, where the election took place, a body of men, aimed with stones, suddenly sprang upon a wall near the highway. and assailed his carriage by throwing stones in great numbers at it.; that the horses were stunned, and altimately knocked . down;, that one person was Wed on the spot, several were wounded,. and every Gentleman in the carriage severely wkaded—the defendant himself having several of his ribs fractured that a public inquiry was instituted into the outrages, the result of w h ich had shown that Sir Wm. Brabazon had received direct and repeated information frOm the chid constable of police,. that a scheme of murder had been long before organized, and was to be put in exe, cution on the day of the election, in erderito.give it the colour of a snob tumult; that Sir Wm. Brabazon, nes glected or interfere to prevent the outrages, and refused the assistance of the officers of the police to allay them; The-speech, after'atating a variety of minor particulars, concluded by laying, that if su:h a proceeding were. to be allowed to pass unpunished, the only inference to be drawn from. it would be. that the Sheriff and several listless wretches could enter into a conspiracy to render the civil office unavailing, and that he' could do that with impunity in virtue of his office, for which any other man in the empire would be hanged. The Learned Counsel then adverted to the affidavit of Sir William Brabazon, filed in sup port of the rule, which negatived many of the allega tions made by Mr. Brown, and explained many of the cit cumstanses which he had brought for ward in support of his statement in the House of Commons. The At torney General then detailed at great length the contents of the affidavits filed in opposition to the rule op.she par — • t.qf Mr. Brown.. They were the affidavits of the Inspector General of the Police, and the Chief Constable at Castlebar, and of Lieuts. Higgin, Brown, and several other persons. Tbey stated, that Sir W. Brabazon, pre . • emus to the election,had notice o' the premiditated attack which was afterwards made by the mob: that Major Warburton 48pliBki SO bigi to know what number of men he would requorl,b) Fumy. the peace, and offered to furiiiish hies walk . any force that he might think ne cessar,y;.that.before it was known that there would not be a contest, bmegvested to have 360 men, but after wards stated that SO would be sufficient; that on the morning of the 24th of June, when the election took place, a great number of persons in the interest of Lord Bingham (who had previously declared their intention to riot)Assembled in the Court House, having broken open the doors; that on their coming into the town, they shouted for Lord Bingham, and denounced ven geance on the Brown patty ; that they had armed themselves with bludgeons and boughs of trees, and went about crying out, " Diwn with the Browns;'!, some of them swearing that they would kick the Brown party out of the town; that previous to the actual outrages taking place, Sir William Brabazon was aware that there was every indication of a tumult being about to commence, having heard many of the expressions that were by he mob; notwithstanding which he went to..the barracks, and left word that none of the men should go out until he gave them tacky ; and that on coming from the barracks, he retired to the com mittee room of Lord Bingham, of .whom he was a Ciend and partisan; that in consequence of this the police remained locked up in the barracks doting the greater part of the time chat the riot was going on; that Sir William Brabazon refused to interteie to quell the tumult; and on being applied to after cries of murder were heard, he coolly said " Never mind it, it does not signify,' and immediately sat down in Lord Bingbam's Committee Room to take refresmepts. The affidavits then went on to state in detail the various acts of out rage committed, and the injury done to many indivi duals. Two, persons, it appeared, had been killed, and many. others severely wounded. Tlaettffidasia of Sir W. Brabazon, we have already observed, contained a de nial if many of the statements made on,the part of Mr. Brown. The Attorney-General commented at vat length op die ifiadoua details, and. observed, that it the Sheriff had taken the proper prycautiocts Ac might have enced any riot taking place 4 and sailOss aka, after kotimatiou givers tp him that uruzder„was.,being nrimirted, have prevented away, of, 141., totes that SOksaegoently took place. POMO „Crow; fire ness e or some other cause, •har,l, beeitluilty of a dere, heck)* of his duty as a peace officer, and that was what Mr. Brown ha] charged him with. He did not mean to say that he and the other persons had conspired to commit murder ; but that by shining his eyes to the outrages that were going on, he had connived at them, and was therefore fairly subject to all the observations that had been made. Mr. ALDERSON folio wed on the same side. Mr. BROUGHAM rose to support the rule, but was interrupted by Lord TENTERDEN, who said it was too late to go on with the case today. The further arguments were then postponed till to morrow (this day). COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,u .!Immtsayrft, JAN. ?A DEARY V. BROAPBELT. Ti.is was an action for a breach of promise of mar. riage. , It was tried at Westminster; before Mr. Justice (laselee, during the sittings after last Michaelmas Term, when a verdict was found for the plaintiff. da mages 5001. It appeared at the tri.il that the plaintiff some titne since assisted her uncle, as bar-maid, in a public-house belonging to him on the Chelmsford-road, and it was at this house tlra: the defendant. who is also a publican, carrying on business in the Whitechapel road, first became acquainted with her, but he paid her no particular attention until the summer of last year, when she came on a visit to her aunt, Mrs. Nutt, who lived in Brick-lane, Whitechapel. Here he had frequent opportunities of seeing her, and in a short time paid his addresses to her regularly as a suitor. These attentions, however, lasted only for three weeks, when, without as signing any reason whatever, he deserted her and married another woman, who had a fortune of 1,0001. and whom the defendant had told the plaintiff - he could at any time• marry, but that he would rather marry her (the plaintiff) without a farthing, than the other with all her property. These being the tacts of the case, the Learned Judge, in leaving it to the Jury, told them that he thought it was not a case calling for great or aggravated damages, nor one in which very small damages should be given. It appeared to him to be one in which a middle course would be advisable.—the Jury, however, having re tired for some time, returned a verdict for the amount ' , before nientioned. Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS now moved for a rule to shew cause why that verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the ground of excessive damages. The Learned Sergeant having read througtrie whole of the evidence given at the trial, contended that it was not sufficient to warrant the verdict that had been returneJ, which was for the full amount at which the damages were laid in the - declaratioe. Mr. Justice PACK observed, that this' was the Aria; time he had ever heard of the Special Pleader's• dish being given by a Jury. • 2 The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said. thatobe damages certainly appeared to be •eicessive, and.psiipOsed that the case should stand over for a few• dayS, that the attornies might see each other, when probably the plain tiff would be content to take something less. . . Mr. Sergeant ANDREWS assented In this proposal, and said if the matter should not -be sirranged by Monday nest, he would on that dal retie* hifipPlication. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT,'ILi. .25. James Holbrook, an °Meer connected with the' Blockade t2ervice, was brndght up for further hearing, when he was declared to be entitled to his discharge, an ineffectual opposition having been raised against him on a previous day. Mr. Warwick thefi • addteised the Court and said;that he was a creditor tolhenmoiintliff 2COI. for cloth sold to the 'insolvent in the year* 1818, since which title he! had lost sight'of (witileies)'claitin was - ex.' 'ended from the schedule, and hi should have , been ignorant of insolvent'siappereittioll' i but for Seeing a notice 'of it in a liestripipet,, • ' - The insolvent waft- hereupon oe:timed . upon this matter, when it appeared tlfin formet4he.ssas a Black weSl Hall-factor, andlid 6:inflicted - debts fix cloth-to, a considerable amount, 'but as to had beeodeprived of his books by an execution, lie - hacr iiot inserted these , debts in his sc! cattle, not knowing the amounts or the residence of the polies. Mr. Commissioner HAEntiriaid, that the loss of boo Es. was no excu,e for excluding debts from the schedule, and it was quite clear that the most important points connected with that doeuntent had been studiously concealed from the view oT the - Court. - , The insolvent was then remanded to saktdreitize, and' to give notice to Mf."Wirifick and the:Other opposing' creditors ; and ordered to amend his schedule brin setting all a editor 4 connecied with. the iltith trade, bib. POLICE I N TELLIGENCE. • M ANSIO N. 111(11;gt • Yesterday William Page, SuperiatentialiVof Ilse Watch in one el . the Wards, was cbsrged by Henry Allen, an undertaker, with basing stolen a silk hatband, such as are used at funerals by under takers men. The complainant stated, that he occasionally employed the pri soner as an assistant mute at funerals, ai:4l that on Thieraday, the prisoner having been engaged to attend a job, and having performed. it, adjourned with his tellow mutes to the Turk's Head, at Aldgate, to unrobe and refresh. Immediately after this most agreeable pail of their duties was executed, the hatband in question was missed Every other person stripped. The prisoner threw off his coat, and with his staff iu his hand, demanded to be examined. Some of the fraternity objected to an intention of giving the Officer more indul gence then bad been yielded to the test, and he was of course in duced to do as they bad dune, when to the astoni►hment of all, down dropped the hatband from his person. The Constable who was called in to assist in the business, de posed, that upon examining the prisoner's person, he found the hat band snugly deposited between the shirt and waistcoat behind. It was stated that 15 men had been watched, the value of the hat band was ss. _ _ • The LOAD Maims—The prisoner is committed. Superintendent uf the Watch—Committed! Oh, my Lord Mayor, you won't commit me; consider the disgrace, my Lord; you surely won't commit me ! • " Upon my word I wiU," said the Loan Mayor • and the pri soner was fully committed to Newgate fur trial O n leaving the Justice Room, be said to the Officers about the plece--" Isn't this too bad?" GIJILDHALL Thomas Lay, Jahn Wood, Edmund Sexton, Wes. Wilms, were brought before Alderman CROWDS/1 yesterday, charged with com mitting a gross breach of the peace, and Thomas Garlick was accused of having instigated the said de fendants. Widow Garlick, the' mother of the defendant Thomas, was now the complainant, and, from the discolouratioras abost her eyes and face seemed to have been very severely beaten. A Solicitor attended on each side.— Thomas Gat lick became a bankrupt in 1826, and the mother, who. bad been previously supported by him, then assumed her right to the house and businesi under her letter of administration, and took in her son Jeremiah, discarding her son Thomas. Thomas con. ceived he also had a right to the premises, and he repeatedly au tempted to take gpssession, which led to each of the brothers being put under recogazances for assaults. Thus the matter stood on Thursday, when the pasties complained against took forcible pos session of the premises, and in the attempt the widow got severely beaten. The invaders having used a sword to terrify her, aid in deed_ected in a violent. manner by assaulting her, they were held to bails Thomas Gulick in his own recognizance of 3001. and two sureties in 1501. each. BOW-STREET. Yesterday, Mrs. Hassell, a poor widow woman, who keeps the St. Clemeiit'e Coffee-house, in St. Clenwnt's Chureh-yard, opposite the cburch, • was brought to this office, before Sir It. Mainz, to an• rawer to an information laid against her by Johnston, for having sold to hie follower At►inson, a pint of wine, without being law fully aut►orised so to do. • bits ; Hassell at once pleaded guilty, but urged, in extesuation, that she had had an excise license. air It. Mattes.—But that dues not authorise the sale of wine ►y retail. Mrs. Hassell said, she was swats of the fact ; and, therefore, the • instant she had become acquainted with ft,-she bad withdrawn the excise license, and ceased to retail Mine, or toffee it on her premises. Johnston—Yes; but that was after the information was laid. Mrs. Hassell—lt was the Information that first brought me to the knowledge that I was acting illegally, and the next moment I ceased to do so. Sir Mcßae's—l'm really sorry for you. I wish some amendment in the kw were made, to prevent these really oppressive proceeding% Mrs. Hassell—l trust, Sir, you will be as lenient with me as you possibly can ; I am really unable to pay a fine. I have been a widow only two months, and I have always observed the strictest regularity. Sir Rico...au—l am very sorry for you, my poor woman. I wish it was in nay power to make the fine ss. indeed, if I could I would not infliit any penalty at all. The Add is imperative. I howeme convict you in the lowest penalty, which, I regret to say, is 101. Mrs. Hassell said she would pay the penalty within the Lima allowed by the Act. HATTON-GA RDEN. • John, alias Alerantkr Ephraim Sherret, charged with passing hurt Bank of England notes, was brought up for ae-examination miser day. Mr. James Drew, of the King's Arms, Brentford, deposed that the prisoner, with whom he had been acquainted about twelve months, passed a st. note to trim on the 11th of last September; which he subsequently learned was a forgery. Mr. Jones, of the Duke of Wellington, Elishopsgate-without, deposed that MAR", the prisoner, as a coal merchant, for four or five year.; be came td witness on the pith or 25th of last September, and changed a 10 fi note with him; be gave him the full change, nine sovereigns and 20s. in silver. Mr. Plowman, of the Feathers publit boom,. Lippe Thames-street, deposed, that. he changed a 51. note for the primmi on the sth inst. which turned out to be a bad one. .Mr. John Northing, of the Wuolpack. Gravel lane, Southwark; who, like ether of the witnesses, knew the prisoner for some yeairk deposed that he changed a SI. note for him on the 15th of Oettitrire, which was also a forgery. Thomas Field, who knew the prisoner for eight years, deposed !that be changed a 101. note for the prisoner,' it the Skinners' Arms public house, Spafields, on the 10th instant, on which occasion the prisoner paid him Qt. 10s. be was Indebted to him for some time. Mr. John Emery, of the Duke of York public-house, Vauxhall. road, deposed, that he teceived a 51. note on the 12th of last Octi;- her from a young girl named Sarah Ann Jane, which was renamed to hint by his brelver as a forgery. The girl alluded to by Mr. Emery deposed, that she got it from the prisoner to get changed, and she returned the change to him. The various notes alluded to by the different witnesses were examined by Mr. Freeman, of the Bank of England, and all of them be pronounced to be forgeries. There were a number of other cases against the prisoner, but the inquiry into them was postponed untilatext Friday, to whichclay die prisoner was remanded. M A RLBOROUGH-STREET. Yesterday the Stewards and Secretary of the United Britons' Benefit Society, held-at the,Plough, in Carey.street, requested ir G. FA • 's advice under the following circuinstanees—Nicholas Hennigan, now under sentence of death in Newgate, for shooting at Mt. Taylor, of Newman-street, had applied tot a weekly allowance as he was afflicted with rheumatism. They, however, wished to be informed whether he was entitled to any relef from their fund., Arising beeu convicted of a capital offence. Persons confined for debt were entitled to ss. 6d. perweek, but there was nothing in the Articles of the &witty to exclude those members who were confined on charges of felony and assault;. - Sir G. FARCANT said, that although Hennigart was dead in law he was not so in fact, and he, therefore, thought he was entitled to the allowance. TOWN-HALL. . Lee was charged with atealing 3 .great chat in the house of Crutcbley, the White Lion, Tooley.street. The prisoner was seen coining down stairs with the coat belonging to the lantl:ord on his back, and immediately given in charge. On bring askrd to account. for his'conduct, he said he knew how he ;ante to do it—ha bad been five months out of 'employ, and was so reduced that no parson would give him employment. Committed for re.examinatian. Three boys were committed for stealing a waistcoat from the shop door of Noah Nathan, a tailor, in FishmongeregaUey, at one o'clock at noun. UNION BALL. Yesterday a pawnbroker residing in the London Road, was summoned for refusing to compensate a French Lady for the lOU of a gold chain, value ten guineas, upon which he lent bee the sum of 21. - . The complainant stated that previous to the month of March the pledged the article abovernentioned at the defendant's 'bop, and hearing that his premises had been destroyed by fire, she proceeded there in order to- make inquiries about the article, When the defendant said that she need nut make litrtelf an 'easy, for her chain and also a brooch, which she bad also pledged at his shop, were safe. Upon the faith of that representa tion, the complainant said sbe wis,satistied; but *heti she subse quently called to redeem the chain. the answer she got was that her property was, either lost or destroyed at thetitme (idthkfire, and that, therefore, site could claim,no restitution: • The defendant said that all his:plate and jeiXileri 'Ma/ saved from the fire, but some was stolen. and lost in the ceininsion. The :NIAGISTRATi said, thott ,as he had admitted the . property li?' Safe, he-must make the complainant a compensation for her titoperty.: . • W ORS H I P-ST RRET: - Williams Edwarils, a Welbinown resurrectionist; •was charged with stealing a body fiiim a private burial-ground itt fluxton. The prisoner was stopped by twp.canstables Wish the body in his possession, whiib he cartiedin s a sack. He was committal in de fault of bail; and the sexton; 'who II suppOsedlo have been con cerned in the robbery, Was also ordered to find sureties tor his future appearance. It was stated that the xesurrettioa men pro cured the bodies for 21. and then:sokd the*, to the surgeons for 121. • 1 BIItTH. • At .Florence, on the.7dlrintt.itte 60' . Lady ot anarge Lyon, • • oi Prknaichael, Atunfrieshire, of a son. 1. 41';:- . DIED.' 16e 15th lost. the Rev. 3, 1 . Jacob, Praha:dray of . Saliabory, aged'7ll. NEWGATE LEADENIIALI, MARKETS...I*N. 26. Beef... it Bkl to 4s Od I Veal Mutton .:...... 3s 8d to 4 s Od Pork 4 l 4d to 5. 84 PRICES or HAY Joao STRAW IRSTJAIDAY. ST. J./MINA'S. WNITICHAPEL Hay 41 Ss Ott to .51 5s Od I Hay 31 12s to 51 Os Od Clover 41 158 Od to 51 lSs Od Clover 41..10s to 61 Os 0.1 Straw 11 13. Od to 21 2t 041.1 Straw 11 .84 to II ISs 14 PRICE OF HOPS, PER CWT. J. 25. xsw rocerrs. wsw 11111 Kent ...... 843 to 120 s I Kent .... ?Is i• 1006 .. Sussex ...... 781 to 90s Susscx .111$ 4 756 Essex 80s to 100 s Essex . *brut fa Farnham fine 150 s to lids—Seconds. SiMt to i 4 PRICE OF LEATHRIL Best Dressing 1-lides 111& to. Pitt • Common Ditto ~ 17d to 19d • Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for rutting ... 14d to 1544 ••. I)itto 45 to 1644 to 180 Calf Skins, 36 to 401bs 184 to '24cl Ditto 50 to 701 b, 25d to 116 d Ditto 70 to 80lbs .............. 21d to 234 Small Seals, Greenland).... ....... 19d to 20d Tanned Horse 14d to 17d Spanish Horse Hides... .............. 214 to 274 COURSE OF EXi Amsterdam l2 3 C.F. Ditto at sight 12 0 Rntterdam...2 U 12 i Antwerp l2 3 Hamburgh Ul3 11} Altona 2i U 13 111, Paris, 3day's sight 25 35 Ditto 2 U 25 60 Madrid 15k Cadiz ............ 35i Barcelona 8i1b0a....... !MANOR., Jan, - 15. SOS - 4 Leghorn ...-..- 41 Genoa £s le Veniee.-...... 46 Malta .. Naples ..... 39 Palermo 116idgees lAsbon • Rio Janeiro-. 5$ PRIGS OF GOLD AND siLvaß. Foreign Gold In Bars ,C 5 27 Silver, in bars, standard .. 4 4 so} Sbips at Market. 47* New Castle 6 Sunderland COAL MARE $Z JAM U Ships Sold. Pries). 22} 3as and to 3Ts Ort 31 3fs Od re WI ifdi AIM DOE., Dub% . I 0 France Waterford I 0 Hamburg Guernsey and Jersey 0 0 Flanders Lisbon 0 1 Sweilen Donagbadee 0 o Leeward Islands Buenos Ayres 0 • 0 America Holland 0 1 Jamaica ♦a U. MI& 0 - 4 1 0 i 9 0 4 0 f IGH- WATER et LONDON4MLII)GE TO MORROW. Morning Afternoon £4 minutiae after 11l 62 minutes after It Lams : Printed and Published by. Joits•Alaxiis the Peapnec w at the Sma ()army N 0.2, Pickett-place Ituaile-Bar i ti • 4 " s r t e 4 d • 1 1 0 of 3 0 a 0 n. 1 le IC IS 63 :h 1 P. ie e, co a- er .t, ty Cr !d e- n- :is n, 'lt 1 . 4 Os Oi 1 fd ad