Star. — London, England, 1828-02-19 00:00:00

, . . . ... ' • : . i . - !rt - '7 . I ' : i • ''' . .• ' - ' 1 ".: : ' . -- . 74* *1 ' • • ' • • i . b. • 1 i . : '. 4. I, / 1 1 ' ' ' e I sf r ,-.. ~..- ... • ..4 , 4 . . . . - 1 ieAilov. ..4 . , . • . . .1;4 i . i .. 1.. • - . . . • . .:: ........ . • I - ....• \ ( • Ls 4i'e : .. t i `S. / - f' • .:' '' . -2.,. •- - V . •" , - ..- , • • • .. .... , • j ., ~. -.....\ •. --",•• •• i f.. 4 ... . , • . . • . . . cp,;,t,.t„..., ..„,., ~, . . • ..,..... . i, . ( ~,,,,„.,.. . e J7'"-* TUESDAY EVENING, FEB; NUMBER 12.790.] VW 19, 1828. [PRICE SlitV,ENPly4C,i,. i } • NgAPOLITAX 1.011 - 14 OF 62.5u0,000, NRCOCI ATED BY Ma. R. M. ROTHSCHILD. IN LONDON. NOTICE IS HgitEßY GIVEN, that-, in conformity with the 'Contract of the said Loan. pursuant to which a Sinking Fund was PrOvide4, Whereof the Seventh lislf- Redemption foil due on the Ist of the present Month of February, his Excellency Count •Luiirtlf, Envoy Extraordinary and 3lituster Plenipotentiary of his Majesty the King of Naples, jointly with \I. Rothschild, and accompanied by Mr. John Venn, Notary Public, have, on the 18th Instant, CANCELLED and DEPOSITRD in the Bank of England, according to the form prescribed, the amount of Foorteen Thousand .Five Hundred Pounds Sterling, in Special Bonds of the said .Loan, as specified below, being the first Moiety of the Stan fixed *tor the Redemp tion, in the Year 1828, viz.—One per Cent. per Annum un the amount of the Loan, including the Saving of Interest on the Seventy-six Thousand Four Hundred Pounds Sterling, Cancelled to the Ist day of August last. Numbers of Special Bonds Cancan.. . Letter A. 8332 8333 8154 8335 8223 82!2 8088 • 8024 7934 7916 7552 7507 7508 7509 • 7510 7321 7222 7223 7224 7225 7226 7397 7191 7197 7116 7101 6679 6680 6681 6674 6386 6287 6288 4,289 6044 • 6045 6016 6047 • 6043 6049 6050 6051 60 1 ,2 6053 6054 6055 5959 5060 5951 • 5945 551-:4 5506 5456 5335 5502 .1218 . 5246 4954 4955 4859 5946 3944 3304 3'269 3260 5245 3225 3.326 227 3228 7.29 3230 3231 3252 3.:53 3234 5235 5241 3247 3248' 5336 3128 3079' 5073 - 5073 3005 2890 2573 2574 2302 2263 2153 2154 1635 1636 1576 1314 1365 1366 1167 1188 1189 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1075 1074 1075 • 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 10142 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 075 965 926 927 886 780 615 6,e7 609 609 610 511 37.9 537 262 222 202 40 37 38 145 Bonds of 6100 each . £14,500 IMPERIAL PARLI.AMENI;. HOUSE OF LORDS. 'FM IS. Earl SPENCER had several Petitions to creSent from Profs." tans Dissenters and others for the Repeal of the Test and Corpora: fion Act. The Noble Earl said, that many of the Petitions ac knowledged that in consequence of the annual indemnity Act, the., were not so much injured by the Act foi the repeal of which they petitioned, as they would 'otherwise be. The Noble Earl then presented Petitions to the effect abovZ stated from the Protestant Dissenters of Welter-, in she county of Hants; from Swatiburn, in the county of Bucks; from Fordhani, in the county of Essex; Titchfield, in the county cf Hants ; from the town of Cardigan, in Wales; frtim the Independents of Neverdon, in. the county of Nonhampton ; from the Baptists of Old Fortlham, in Essex; and from the congregation of Protestant Dissenters assembling for Di eh e Worship in Union-street, in the Borough of Southwark. The Bishop of CH IC H ESTER had a Petition to present for the Repeal of he Test and Corporation Acts, with the sentiments of which be did not accord ; but which as he had been applied to, and as it was respectfully worded, be thoosht it his duty to present to their Lordships House. It was trorr. -lie Protestant Dissenters of the City of Chichester. Earl EN B LYN presented a similar Petition from the Protestant bissenters of the town of Carmarthen. Lord KING, after a few words, denouncing all civil disabilities on account of religion as gross violations of reason and justice, pre sented Petitions for the Repeal of the rest and Corporation Acts, front the Protestant Dissenters of Tenham, In Essex ; from Mem bees of the Established Church and other inhabitants of Lyme Regis; from the Protestant Dissenters of Amstrad, in Essex ; from the Independents of Abergavenny ; from the Protestat-t Dissenters and other friends of religious Ilbyrty in the town of Folkston, in knot; from the Protestant Dissenters of St. Hinters, in the Island -of Jersey; front the Protestant Dissenters of the Baptist Deoomi station of Ounditt.in Laneaskiest, from the laalspeoimot Cows- Seim of EbeneUr Chapel. War Lsaltdostass ; from slot Proorstaist Dissenters of Sparden,itt the comely of Kew ' • and frosts tile Pre,. lyterians of Myrick, in the county of Nuctlauinberiood. • The Earl of WALDEGItfiVE presented a simile' Petition from the Protestant Dissenters of Kasresboroosk, is the county of Bucks. Lord DACRE presented Petitions to the same effect from the Protestant Dissenters of Bishop's Stanford; of the town Of Royston ; of Ashfield, in the county of Cambridge; from the Congregation of lodependents assemhliog for Divine Worship in Castle-street, Abergavenny ; from the Congregation of Intipes dents of the New Road, St. George's in the East, in the county of Middlesex ; from the Protestant Dissenters of Tentacle's, in Kent ; of Rochdale, in Lancashire ; oft town in Gloucestershire; of Newton Abbott, in the county of Devon; of Broadoalt, in the county of Ewe: ; of Brixhan, in the county of Devon; of St. Au bites' in the Island of Jersey ; from the Protestant Dissenters of Abe Baptist denomination assembling for Divine Worship in the Chapel in Little Mie street, Goodman's-fie-ids ; from the Protes eafit Dissenters of Middleburg, 'and from several other places.— The Petitions were severally laid on the tattle, Rail STA tLHOP E moved that the various Papers presented the -other day in pursuance of his motion respecting the importation of Corn and Wool be printed.—Ordered. ' Lord WHARNCLIFVE presented a Petition from the Fisher amen of Scatboroualt and other ports in Yorkshire, praying that she Bounties for the Encouragement of the British Fisheries may not be discontinued.—Ordered to lie on the table. • The Exchequer Bills (12,000,0000 Bill, and the Transfer in Aid Bill, were severally read a third time and passed. • Lord TEY NHA NI withdrew the motto* for Papers relating to Criminals and Paupers, of which be had given notice. Lord WII ARNC, LIFER begged leave to move for a Paper echoing to a subject of the greatest importance, and one to which he was desirous of devoting a considerable degree of attention.' • His motion was for as bumble Address to his Majesty, requesting him to give directions that there be laid before that House a copy of the Report presented on the 14th of February, 1828, by the Di rectors of the National Vaccine Establishment.—Agreed to. Mr. faxsznouss presented the Twenty-fourth Report of the Tanjore C,ommissionery and the Fourth Report of the Mysore _ . Mr. To presented an Account of the Emoluments of the Receivers-General of T.ixes. `Tim House then Adjourned until to-morrow (this day). ROUSE OF COMMONS. Various Papen were presented from the Tax Office, the Imperial Gas Company, and the India !louse.—Ordesod to he printed. General GASCOYNE obtained leave to bring in a Bill to ex empt the Liverpool Steam Boats from Pilotage charges. Mr.ILKING presented Petitions from the Roman Catholics of the parishes of Cove, Castlehyde, Macroton, Kilshandrust, and one or two other parishes, praying for Emancipation.—Ord. to be printed. Petitions praying- for the Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, were presented from the following places ; By Mr..). SMITH, from the Tutors and Students of flomerton College; the Old Gravel Pits Meeting House, Kentish Town; Union.stieet Chapel, Southwark ; Dedham, in Essex; Bridge End, Hastings; and the Brighton New Road Chapel. By Mr. M. A. TAY LOR..from -the Dissenters sf the City of . Durham; from Stockton-on-Tees and Walsingham, in the County of Dothan. His opinion was now, and always had been, favour. able to the repeal of these Acts. By Sir C. NORGAN. from Newport, in the county of Monmouth ; by Sir R. Prawn, from Haverfordwest ; by Mr. TALBOT, from the borough of Warwick; by Mr. STAIIII.ZY, from Preston and Bolton.le- Moors ; by Mr. BORRADAILK, from Newcastle-under- Line • by Sir C. CoLa, from Swansea, in the county of Glamorgan ; by Newcastle-under- Line; DAVieS, from the city of Worcester; by Lord WILLIAM Itosseu., front TavistOck ; by Mr. W. Tatum, from Devizes; by • Itir. Seam Race, from Salisbury ; by Mr. P. THoweson, front the town of Folkestone; by Mr. MA WiHAL. from certain Dissenters of the county of Noffolk ; by Mr. Fannon, from Andover, in the County of Hants; by Sir Joon WItOTYCILZY, from Uttoxeter ; by Mr. D A w, from Malverm Point. in the county of Suffolk ; by Col. CHAPLIN, from the tuwu of Spalding, in Cambr idgeshire. Mr. LIDDELL, from North Shields , Grantham, and other places. He rite concurred in the propriety of repealing the Sacramental lest. With respect to the Cenporation Act, he trusted, if repeakd, that the repeal would uot extend to Eaksiastical Cor porations. by mr. N. CALVIRT, from Horsham ; by Mr. Bywa , fro m lirrehan, in the cous•ty of Norfolk; Pettit:monk ; the Chapel ol Si. Geoige's, kat ; and Branford ; Mr. Loon Keck, from Lei "tic* t Mr. Diurnierni. from the town of Warminster, and other places; Ms. U. TIM& j Mr. Alderman WASTWILIS, front the Dissenters of the parish of Hackney; Mr. Rosasrs, from Mgl4. stone ; Mr. BARING. from Hatfield, Holyhead, and three other places ; Lord Ntrovrr, from Hadnor, in Buckinghamshire. for eh* Repeal of all Sacramental Te 4 whatever; Mr. LENNA ID, from Cheswell; Mr. Alderman Tnottrsoo, from, cettain Dissenters la East Clt?ap, in the city of London. The Petiiioata were all ordered to be primed. Mr J. KNOX presented a Petition horn the Roman Catholics of Newry, praying for Financipation.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. Alderman WOOD presented a Petition from the Maltsters of the city , and county of Gloucester, praying for the Repeal of the Malt Act of last Session. Ile hoped such all Act would not he allowed to pass the House again . Some of the clauses were of such a nature that it was found impossible to carry the ict into effect. It operated as a great and seri ous gri t van ce up o n t h e Maltsters. Petitions of a similar nature were presented by Mr. HART Davis, from Bristol ; by Mr. R. C. PALLIIIER, from the Msltsters of Surrey; and by Mr. H. ALIMANDIIII, from the Maltsters of Barn= staple.—Ordered to be printed. On the motion of Colonel DAVICS, a Return was ordered the distribution of the Waggon Train. Sir .1. NEWPORT presented Petitions, praying for E ncipa. tion, from two Parishes in the county of Waterford. same Hon. Member presented a Petition from the CorporAtion and, Chamber of Commerce of the city of Waterford, pray jug that Cie law.; relating to the tri,h butter trade nniiist be consoiniated—and acother Pet!' ion from the ann? Body, complaining of clruin abuses .n • he Admiralty Cour( of Ireland.—Ordered to be printed. - Mr. 111001tE gave notice that he should on Thuriday next bring forward a Motion respectlag the laws affecting Real Property in Ireland. Mr. SPRING RICE presented Petitions from certain Romus Ca holies of the counties of Keay and Westmeath, praying for Emmcipation —Order .4 to be printed. On the motion of Mr. Wurrstons, Returns were ordered of all Articles exported to and imported from the East Indies to Great Britain and Irel md, front J.n. 1820, to Jan. 1827. . . On the motion of Mr. Commix, a Return was ordered of all Itiritta imported into London in the years 1824, 182:;, - and 1826, ;he Duty paid, &c. TEST AND COSTaIIATIoN ACTS. Lard J. ft CISS Li. postponed hW relative to the re-4 and Corpora , ion Acts, tram next Thursday, to Tuesday the LW;h. Mr. W. PEEL presented certain Returns, the nature of which we could not heat.—Ordered to he printed. Petitions praying fur the Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts were vres,nted by Mr. GCIIST, from certain Dissenters of the County of Brecon; by Sir T. ACLAND , from Newtown and other _ _ plates lu Devuu by Mr. Losuwito, from Oilskin. . NINISTRRIAL EXPLANATIONS. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the o , der of te. DA, for the House going into a Corn st of Supolv. Lotd NORM ANBY said,. be availeffbintself of the opportunity how giiten by the Rtght . l4 , ,n. Geotlemen to - commit the pre.ent motion, as• the• practic.• of the Holise authorised him, into an ccCasion for asking for certain explanations, which, as a Member of that kinuNe; he had a tight to expect. He could astute the House, that it was with the gt eate-t reluctance he ap pealed before them, 11. s excuse, it any excuse shoi.l:l redeemed necessity, must be tlte disappointment vi hid) he, common he believed with the great majority of the House, and of the public, telt on Kiday night, wi en the opportunity then affnrd. d of entetiog into ome expl.mation was neglected by the 1641 t Hon. c,tnt eu,en opposite (Mr. kluskiss. n and Mr. Heitiei.). . There prevailid A general expecta inn, both in and our of doors, that the opportunity which then presented it belt would be made use of for the purpose of satisfying those who thought some explanation'necessary. Hay mg been, however, allowed to pass, not, he believed, from any unwillingness to explain on the part of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Huskisson), or from ina polity to give a satistact.iry explanation, he trtt,tecino blame would attach to him for de course le was now about to take. B ing tioconnieted with all partiei. is would not be supposed Oat he acted from party 'Ma . tives. He felt that he sea, acing for the be,t, in now giving the Right Hison. . I,:pentleman an opportu nity to explain; He ti ust 4e ; sheuld be exempt from i t all suspicion of hostile fee specAs to personal hosti lity he entertained none towarets any individual, either in or out of the House. With respect to patty feeling, trOm that he was equally free. He had taken 'an opportunity before, in the course of the. Session,- to say, that he felt no opposition to the present Admini stration, and should be entirely governed in his opposi• lion or support by the measures they shnuld bring for ward. He was unconnected with the two Governments which preceded the present. For some Members of both he entertained great private regard, and in many of their political views he completely concurred. If any blame attached to the course he now pursued, he ,alone was responsible for it. As a report had some how gone abroad that his Itrght honourable friend be lii.isi him (Mr. Tierney) had an intention of asking for explanation upon the same points, he felt it a duty he owed to his Right lion. Friend to say, lie never had tf.e least communication a ith him on the subject, either in or out of doors. He acted merely from the sugcestions of his owl mind as an . independent Member of P. 4: Ha pent.. He feared that in thus endeavouring to vindi cate himself against the charge of presumption, he should rather aggravate the offence, by dwelling s. , long .upon .th s introductory part of the business. In what 'further he bad to state he should be as bird* as he could. He wig not going to put forward the opinions of others, he would merely state his own. It seemed to have been pretty generally elected out of doors th;t his Right Hon. Friend (.%'lr. Tierney) Mould have taken an oppor tunity of explaining the tau-es which led to the dissolu tion of the late Administration. lie ear - no reason why such an expectation should have been entertained ; to him it appeased somewhat more reasonable to expect' that the two Right Hon. Gentlemen who (filleted so irreconcileibly upon o ne point, should explain how they aft rwards came to act together. the. e were two ques tions which very naturally presented themselves to his mind upon this occasion ;—First, What causes led to tl e dissolution of the late Administration ? The second, and tar more important consideration was, What were the principles upon which the prevent was fornied ? (Hear ) This was not the first time that doubts had been started upon those two point:, and an explanation had taken' place elsewhere. As public men were - public property, and as it was important that no erroneous impression should be allowed to remain on the public mind with respect to duir conduct, he hoped those who were more immechaley interested would feel no reluctance to follow the example set in ;pother place. Tne, NOG Lord w:.o was at the head id tlriaate GovernMent stated in another place that the caus e.ol the dissOution 4 that Government was an irreconcileAW diffeice between the Brett Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Hasiisson) and the then Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. He' ties), with respect to the appnintment..nt a Chair man of the Finance Com mittee. His Noble Friend, Lord Aliliorp, was the is dividual upon whose appointment the irrecosteileable ' Jiffereiice took place. He presuMed that it was ninth.] intention of his Noble Friend to make any observations upon this . matter ; !sot of his Noble Friend he was bound' in justice to say, that, from what be knew of his Noble 'Friehd, add of the opinions generally enteittdoed of kW- . there ivai . nd Man mori• liktely to reflect credit. of the. Committee, and to Ore general satisfaction tb the country—(Hear, hear.) It was naturally to be etpecttd that - the Right Hon: Gentlemen (Mr. Herries) would )rase declared what his objectibni were; whether they were of a pr rsonal nature, which could not be well sup posed, or turned upon his idea of the unfitness of Lord Althorp to fill that important hi:nation.' As Lord Gu derch, in another place, h as ex pl a i n ed t h e time mitances connected with this differeoce, he should beg leave to present them *to the House in that shape in Which they had come b fore the pubic. „" The application, as far as I understand, was to ascertain if that individual would have any indisposition to undertake the task. should the Government propose hint for that purpose. That pro position was, I again repeat, made nto.l certainly without my knowledge, or, as I afterwards scorned, the knowledge of the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Herries) whose official situation in the Administration more immediately connected hint with the eonsi- deratiuu of financial subjects. list I ought to add, that From sub +equeat explana;ions which were I;iyen to me, I under+tood tha• the application was nut made witted thing,"or.in such manner as fixedly : So pledge t h e Clutreretnent and bind th-ts o the appointmeut. When I, however, I dined t: a this (0/31. . . . municatioti bad been made, the resuit of which has proved to myself individually anything hut sazittfactory, I naturally in quirrd, bad any previous communication been nride to tht. Chancellor of the Exchequer upon the matter; and then, fn. the first time, I beard that there bad not been any. I instantly I. mented that such had been the bet, but of course imputed it to mere oversight, and •expressed a hope that it was one 9f those on fortunate accidents which would not go beyond our own official circle, and could not give rise to any eventual difficulties amongst us. My Right Hon. Friend (*e believe Mr. Hitskiison) undertook to explain fully and satisitetotily to the Chancellor of the Exchequer what had been dune. I wish to guard myself against the slightest idei that I was hostile to the appointment of the individual who was in this manner nominated to the Chair of the Finance• Con- nyttee, and was only anxious that the mode and circumstances of the comatunicatten with him should be clearly explained and re lieved front any inisunderst.nilir.g ; and with this view I commu nicated with my Right lion. Friend (Mr. lierries) in the most cull ctliatory manner upon the subject. It did, however, Aril happen, that on the next day my Right Hon. Friend informed me that he . _ had very strong objections to the course which had been taken.— He stated, as I understood him, that his objections referred more to the circumstance of the nomination having been made with out his having been consulted, than to the material proposition itself, and that, so placed, he could not accede to it. Various-ex planations followed, as I have been informed, some of them by letters, between my two Right Hon. Friends (Mr. Iluskisson and Mr. Herries); and I, who never saw 'leis correspondence, was In hopes for a time that it had been perfectly satisfactory to all the parties concerned in it. Indeed, my Right Honourable Friend ( Mr. Ifuskisson, we believe) thought at the moment his explana tions had been so entirely satisfactory, that he never mentioned the terms of the correspondence to me. I was led therefore to con. sider Slut the explanations had terminated in a manner perfectly satisfactory to all parties; I had no reason whatever to believe that any such difference remained unadjusted as would lead any individual of the Government to quit his post in consequence of it. I was not in any way led to think at the time that if this appoint ment were persisted in, either of my Right Hon. Friends would have felt it impossible to remain any longer in the Administration. This business, I ought to say, took place at the end of November ai.d beginning of Ikcember, and it was not until the 25.1 of De cember that I received a letter from my Right Hon. Friend ( Mr. Harries), announcing that if the appointment of Chairman of the Finance Committee were persisted in, it would be impossible fur hint to remain any longer a klemb.r of the Government. He first stated to me his objection to the mode in which the matter had been discussed without his concurrence, and he next described (through misinformation) that this negociation had been promoted, settled, and concluded with my formal sanction, and without his knowledge. He then proceeded to state his objections, on public grounds, to the pal ticular nomination ; ? ltd he concluded by post. direly informing me, that under these circumstances he felt it his .duty,on pi inciple, to place his office of Chancellor of the Exchequer at my disposal, if it was any convenience to me to accept his re.ir nation and pin any other person in his plaCe." The NOb:e Lord (Goderich) then prikeeded tossy he found it impossible to teconcile the two Right Hon. Gentlemen on this point. From this statement of the Noble Lord, he (Lord Normanby) could only say, that the objections of the Right Hon. urable Gentleman (.Ir. Herries) did not rest upon public grounds. According to Lord Goderich, they would appear to have arisen more from a supposed slight than from any other cause. If this were the case, one would suppose that the objec. tioni might have been easily removed by etplanation. Had they rested on public grounds, the matter would have 'been . more difficult. The impression on the mind of Lord Goderich `seemed to hate been, that all objec tions had been done away wi.b. It was Lord Goderich who introduced Mr. Herries into the Government.— The thing was of the highest importance as regarding the exigence of that Government ; and Lord Gederich seemed at one time to have thought that the explana ti.n given was satisfactory. All he (Lord Normanby) wished fur was to have some light thrown on those ti ansaCtimis. He would not attempt to offer any opi: ' ,ion or his awn. One t bservation, however, he must Make: When the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Hus kisson) entered at Liverpool into in explanation of his conduct and the principles on which be had joined the present Administration, it did appear rather extraor dinary that he should have orratted all mention of this quarrel which %, as stated hy :Ltd . Goderich to have been the immediate-c , u s e of the dissolution of his Go vernment. It the difference 'had been so trifling as to allow the two Right Hon. Gentlemen so soon alter to act roge her, he could not con preleod the extraori.li non sequitur of Lord Godeii.l4 that nothing rem ined ti .t Into bat to tender his resignation. He should n . .w Come to the far more important p int, the principles on which the present Governm-rat came together—(Hear,. hear !) It did appear,to liim,When first, it was formed, that the materials of whiih it was composed gave indication of some sacrifice, on tt e part - of the Right Hob. Gentle- Man (Mr. Haskisson). He w as 'very desirous, theref o re,. that the Right Hon. Gentleman should have some op portunity kr explanation. That opportunity was given at Liverpool, and . I.e reed with very sincere pleasure the •peech of the Right Hon:tent..He should rat t now enter into the question of any expressed or supposed condi tions between the Right lion Gentleman arid his late colleagues. If such ever existed he bad no knowledge of them, nor had he consulted any person upon the sub ject. He always looked, uiion the services of that Rt. Hon Gentleman as a .sonrce4 great. public benefit. — He considered hitis'ais i one' , tiie first of practical re • • formers,, and in that. view, epos person of ,thiliigliest importance to - the country; one reformer in place being . so much mile valuable thin any number out of.place, AS they must always, when not supported by the re sources of Government, form but an insignificant hew!, in a nttrority. The triumph of his principles afforded : him the most sincere pleasure, and he read, with tvt mixed satisfaction, the announcement of that triumph. in the speech delivered. at Liverpool by the Bight Hon. Gentleman. He read . the reports of it *the London newspapers, and thiry seethed -to him co kW: internal evidenceof accuracy.. • Triat evidence was bonded on the sentiments he was Iliadic) hare giee.s expression to,- for they were the s a me Which he was known to enter.: tain, and which he had ably advocated upon many' pre-' ' .ious occasion?. He thought it quite impossible;iedieill ' that those Gentlemen who with such el•ti-ic t rdinatt talent. and its ' fat a s he had bleu able to observe,- with the 'most inlet /egad to their dbties, repotted pubrC proceeliegs, *should conspire to tix an en:ire polittcAt creed upon the Right Hon. Gentleman. He should not here allude to the circumstance were it twit that a report of the Right Hon..Gentheman's speech, frotri the Liverpool .Courier, had be, n put intp . his hands last nigt: , , and he believed there was now a person in town who stwed that the Right Hon. Gentleman himself corrected the teport in tt.at paper.— (Mr. At/21(mo'; expressed dissent across the t.ble).—Whethsr such was the case or not, he should not undertake to say;' but certain he was, that the Liverpool Courier was ;wit ent , - rect. It seemed more like a garbled tx'ract than a correct report. Thete were some omissions which ap -I:eared rather extraottlinary. The fitlit omission was of the following passage, which appeared' is the London papers. The passageitnlnclistelr. that part 'n which allu%ion illiaPmede us the reftml Of' Lord Narrowly:• • " Notwithwandiag, bolrevel, these nnf:Voirahle cositingeniiiss which were observable in the beginning of December, it was soy anxious wish to see the AdMinistration continued by the lame Mtn anti on the same principles. I whited to have upheld the Govern ment in its then state ; and so dear were the principles It espoOsed to my own feelings, that I should rather have fallen ill the attempt to re-construct its organization than have withheld my poor set vices, or have kept back on'such an occasion." 1111 next omission was of the following passage: " I steak to facts within my own certain knowledge, when I de clare that his Majesty felt the greatest relottatice in.changiug the hlembers of his Government. t , It so happened that the Duke of Wellington, after eonstilting only with one other individual, Dlr. Peel, who pbowssed talents and integrity for the public tierviee—(Hear, hear)---I believe,eame next to myself, I will not ths-ui-e from my Cobstituents that when this communication was made to me, it was in most general terns. _ _ _ k was, in fact, merely asked if I felt any individual objection, or laboured under any particular motive or influence, to preclude me from taking any part in the Ministry wlich the Dube of Wellington was commissioned to form. To an application so geperal, I could only give a general reply. .1" could only strte, that I Was not pre cludes! by party, or party connexions, to forego any attention to what I believed in my own mind and judgment to be due to the interests of my country ; and that, provided the new Administration wire formed upon the principles which I bad espcu'ed, and which I thought indispensable to the welfare of the community, and pro. vided also I could see a pledge for the guarantee of the due operation of my principles, I was nut deprived by any pledge of party or en gagement with others from participating in their promotion." The latter part was nearly the same in the Liver pool Courger. There was another on,ilsion of the follow ng passage, towards the end—. s. I did pot look to the right or the left, I prepared for the best I could accomplish, and think I acted judiciously. Let tuft the puNiii,be misled by the slander of individuals who talk of conspi racy. Whatever they may think of me, I thall only ask of them to look to the conduct of others who acted with me in Mr. Catannes Government." He regretted to say, that ore part Which he read with peculiar pleasure, had been contradicted . by a Noble Duke (Wellington) in another place.. He should not enter into that part of the Noble Duke's speech, in which he stated there was no necessity for guarantris among public men, who wee aware upon what. prin ciples they came together. Towards the close tuff it the followieg passage occurred-- " He (the Duke of Wellington) had given his assent to &eery One of those measures as well as the night Hon. Gentleman and his Noble Friend;' and was it to be believed that, although Winle nix occupying a prominent station in his 31ijegry's criveroniint, he had supported such measures with cordiality and &fitness, he should not support them with more cordiality and .geta:er firmness : , now that he Was placed at the head of that Govt.' nment ?' The flight Hon. Gentleman has been made to say that ::e rt edited guarantees that certain measures shall he carried on and promoted as lir as possible, in the same manner as in the last Session of Parliament. If he (the Duke of Wellington) had supported these, measures. what reason was there to suppose that he would noW depart front his principles, and what necessity, therefore, did there exist feri any such guarantee? He was certain that his Right Hon. Friend never said that be had received any guarantee other than that lie should possess the most perfect freedom to state and to maintain his principles." Tire only inference be (Lord N.) could draw. from all this was, that the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Hos kisson) placed his reliance on three or lour Members of the Cabinet whom he looked upon AS friesidly to his own view of things, and disposed to support the same principles. It was on this, perhaps, lie founded his assertion of guarantees; but then it must he tecoliected that the Noble Duke had seven or eight counter-gua rantees. The Noble Duke, as appeared from tl e fort going extract. having denied that any guarantees were given, and being himselt convincennat he could have said nothing of the kind, it being notorous that srme Members of the Cabinet were opposed to him on two most important creations, he was most anxious to know what the R:ght Honourable Geut!eman really Slid say. He trusted he should be allo,sed to sta'e the reasons why he wished for an explanation on three subljects of the deepest interest—naively, the Catholic .Q.ie.ttior, the Commerii.l Po:icy of the Country, and, thirdly, the Foreign Policy. It. did appear .to him that the cot • mimics,' of the present Government was mire unfavour able to the Citholic Claims than that of the last. Hold ing di:: opinion% which the Right flintourable ii=grte mar, opposite (Mr. Secretary Peel) did, upon that question, and being convinced that the situating of M:. Canning, as head of the Government, did give that (;4verninent a preponderance favourable to the eatl-A lies, he thought the lUght 11 , norirable Gentlersiativer y naturally refused to jean it. The preponderance was now in the opposite direction. They were bad that the Cabinet was to remain neutral. He did n , :t Mean, to deny that a piinciple of neutrality would be supported as far as that was possible; but influence na- to). lowed patronage, and it was equally na ural that pa. tronage should flow in the same direction as principle. He had heard it stated that an Anti-Catholic Cabinet wits the mast likely to forward the real interests of the Catholic Body. He could not . see how 'that could rhappen ; but if there was avy truth in .the, observa tion, they should charge sides, and give the ben eft of their opposition to th.ise whom they wished:swell to, He was willing to.. allow that their Colonial interests were likely to derive advantage from the Right lion. Gentlealair being placed in his'present situation. ‘V.th _respect, however, to, their trading and commercial interest, he could not petceive how they were likely to be benefited by the late changes. The Right Hon..Gentlenian deknowledged last year that. he de rived great at:ippon from that side-of the (louse on which he (Lord $4, 4t, In s carrying intoßfiect hiacutThsperciat .policy generally, but pattienligly with 4e:0aq...t0 the 111,1).. As . q.A mend nrimii ist hich . the..Bill had been defeated wAscitiser import**, or it. was not.. It.unin - poitant, he could not see how the Noble Duke (af Wel lington), by . .wborct it had been. introduced, could well avoid the imputation of an oppositiOn which some had helical factious:. 'lf jrnportant, the Noble Dare must stilt adhere 'to it ; and . how • w.fs' . it to besexpected that ~r