Star. — London, England, 1828-12-19 00:00:00

- _ _-1 him by Mr. tore, he foun d 4 that that dentlernan lad the right of_ purchasing . The plaints th en received 901.105. of Mr. Lore,, which surnrwith the annual pay ments before made by him, made up the 3201. the amount of the purchase money. The .plaintiff subse quentlrcomplained to the assignees that the terms of the agreement with Mr. Lore—or at least of that part of it which gave the liberty to purchase—had not been stated at the time of the sale ; and he having been obliged to give up the landau, now brought his action to recover in damages 1101. 10s. being . the amount of the money he had paid, atter deducting the sums re• c4vesi of Mr. Lore, including 1051. his charge for the repairs of the landau. The acts of the case, as above stated, were proved by the,plaintirs son; and he and another witness,* who intended the sale in 1826, snore that there was no men tion by the auctioneer of that part of the agreem ent which gave Mr. Lore the right to purchase the landau. Mr. Leslie, the auctioneer, however, produced a paper whi ch lie stated was read by him at the time of sale, con t aining the particulars respecting the power to put. cha e at any time within the five years. He said he was satisfied that he read those particulars to the com pany, from the circumstance of his seeing them stated in the paper, though he should not otherwise have been able to speak to the fact. trpea this evidence Lord TIOSTERDIN left the case to the Jury, telling them that Me, believed that the fact auto the power of purchasing the landau by Mr. Lore was gated by the 'auctioneer at the time of the sale, their verdict ought to be for the defendants. The Jury. after a little hesitation i found for the plain tiff—Damages, 1001. PAUL U. LADY WILLPALLT. This action was brought by the plaintiff, a cabinet maker in Orford-street, to recover 141. for, a zebra cabinet and book-case, furnished to Lady Emily Mary Wellesley. Mr. COMMON SZROLINT stated that the defendant, whilst residing alone in Portman-street,Ptxtman-square, went to the house of the plaintiff, a tradeituan, and or dered the goods for which this action was bet ught.— Lady Wellesley, at the time the order was given, re presented herself to be unmarried. He understood that some mistake might have occurred ou the latter point, but before his client was turned round, and deprived of his just demand, the Jury would a; least expect proof pi the Lady's marriage. Severil witnesses then proved the order of the goods, which were packed up and delivered at the residence of the Noble defendant. Mr. F. WILLIAMS. who was Counsel for Lady Wel; lesley, undertook to prove the marriage of his clieot, and to explain why the plaintiff had not been paid. The demand included a charge of 21. for packing, which Lady Wellesley refused to pay, on the ground that the work had not been done properly. The plaintiff, on her Ladyship's refusil to pay, not only gave her the lie, but used insulting language. TA e mar rine of the Right Hon. Lady Emily !dam daughter of the Earl of Cidogan, with Dr. Wellesley, on the 2d June, 1802, at St. George's, Hanover-square; was then proied in the u.O tl way. George Clarke, a Messeng e r to the Briard of Old; _ nance, said he formerly lived with Mark Singleton, Esq. Dr. Wellesley and Lady Emily Mary, his wife, were in the habit of visiting where his master was. Persons of distiection visited them when they lived together in Portman street, Portman-square. Lady Wellesley had six or seven children by Dt. Wellesley. Tlley first lived at Hertford Castle, subsectisendy at Hampton Court Palace, and Chelsea Rectory. Cioss4zainined by the Cosmos SIRGEANT—Witnesi saw Lady Wellesley and Doctor Wellesley at the time he liv.-d with ha master, Mr. Sngleton, in Suffolk. He saw Lady Wtllesley on Monday last, in Puttman-greet. He went to see his Wife, who' bad been seriraig to Lady WelleAey. fsl , s. Catherine - Wood slid she formerly lived with D-ttor Wellesley as - servant. His wife Lady Wellesley was living with him. She . Was the daughter of Lord C sdogan , and had apartme nts in Harripton Conn Palace. Tney were in the habit of seeing and visiting persons of distinction. She knew Lady-Mornington, Dr. Virel letley's mother; Lady Edsil'y Mary Wellesley Was sot living with her husband in Portman street. The Witness left them five years ago. Lord Tairrairiew Considered the marriage proved. The Common SEItpIIANT said they had not proved that a person - living at NO. 8, Portman-street, ;end call mg herself Lady Welleiley, was married to Dr. Wel lestey. LOT(' TENTSADZN—Nb case can be made out if this *ill not do. Another witness was then put in the bol e who stated that she had known Lady Wellesley clueing the last f ur years. She weld with her to the house of the plain tiff. It was Lade WelfesleY who saw him, mid gave directions about the packing of some gnolig - The COMMON SNAGRANP then said be would not give Jtiri end his ,Lordship ,fisither tit Ole. The ev dettce 'Storied the marriage or 'At Wellesley, and Seas iori y tisk any repeat lad been made which was not true. . • Mr. F: WILLIAMS said LOJy Wellearey IMO wil livgly Pay that Whitt the plaintiff wits rm.; entitled to demand.—The plaintiff w 4 l nonsuited. 'COURT OF COVNION PLEAS. Gestriaacc, Dee. 1111. The Cent . ' was occupied during the greater part of the day in hearing a cause arising out of a hood, the defence in which was, the bond had been ;Avec( alter the sign,atute of the party now sued had been attached so it. The a7teratioo consisted of the erasure of the parr 0 ot : e of the sureti.e,„ !lid the substitution of another in its ream. Evidence was giien to show that this objection bad, in fat peen waived by the subs - Assent enedni Of the *resident; but it was submitted Owe could be no waiver Cf such an objection, and the Chief JOirke thoight the point one of so nice and de ticatt a nature, that he declinedgi wing any opinion upon ii and revestedthearto fixed a vet dict fur the plain t•ff, as be would give the defendant leave to move to set aside that verdict and enter a notouit, it the Court should be of opinion that subsequent conduct could not amount to a waiver of an objection of that nature. .hrr. Sergeant Wit,ne,'who appeal es.l for the defendant, waited the case at once to be turned ipto a special au dict,,that the opinion of the Court might betaken upon it in the roost solemn form. Mr. Sergeant Toon would not consult to this, on behalf of the plaintiff. Sergeant WILDS then said, that he should be cOnnt.elled to ask the ChitfJustice's pet missions, to tender a iiill . .ol.exceplions. The guru Juaticit eipiessed, in the most unequi srne,illtiattner, his disappic.bation of that wide of pro ceeding • which he described as being oply a, very Otero. wain( moving for a new utal. i He . did not phiceoo itns bringing his opinion under the tee*" of 'pother Court ;,tot he was Anal* happy that hisjodg spent ilinith,l be reviied by that of thers more compe tent:tbaniiimself; bUt hq Objected to, it as only tending *to laicise the expenses of the parties, and to delay ere, - termination of their snot. Besides, in the - present in. stance he did not !clime toseObill of exceptions could be tendered, when he had expressly declined giving any opinion on the point. His Lorilehipintimated, t that this was not cleating the Court qt Common Pleas very respectfully. Mr. Sergeant WILDE was compelled to take this course; by the conduct of the ot! er side. He protested that he felt not the slightest disinclination to eutrust the Court of Common Pleas or his Lordship, with de entire decisinu of the case; but he did thick his client was entitled to. requite, in a point of 'ugh nicety, that the Court, by the solemn manner in which the point was presented for their consideration, should have evely possible assistance that could be afforded them. He begged that neither at tilis, nor at any other time,might it be coasideted that his tendering a bill of exceptions was meant in the most distant manlier, to convey a dish respect tovrards the Learned Chief Justice, in whom he declated he felt as much confidence as in any Judge that ever sat on the Mr. Sergeant TADDT still refus"d to consent at once to turn tit case into a special verdict. Mr. Sergeant WILD! then said he must adopt the course of tendering a bill of exceptions,which he again pretested he did from no disrespect to the Bench; but solely from the wish to secure for this pilot the most solemn mode of c nsideration tallith the practice cf the Court would afford. The CHIEF JUSTICE then said he bad seen so much delay caused by.these bills of exception, that he would not seal that tendered in the pre ent case, unless the substance of the exceptions was handed up to him be. fore the rising of tee Court, and the bid itself fully prepared and presented before the Worth day of neat Term. Sergeants Wm= and STEPHEN were inclined tin doubt whether his Lordship could impose conditions of this sort upon a legislative tight; and the former ie.' pealed what he had before said as to the necessity he was under of adopting this course. The CHIEF JUsTICII recalled the Learned Sergeant's attention to the fact, that as he had not stated any opis Mon to the July, there was rn thing on which to tolind a bill of exceptions. Mr. Sergeant WILD! said, that his exception would be. that his Lordship ought to here directed the Jury to find f .r the defendant. T e CHIEF JUSTICE did not thitsk the Court of King's Bench would entertain a bill of exceptions founded solely on the Judge's statement that the point in dispute -was so difficult and so novel that he could give no opinion upon it. His Lordship then again addressed the Jury, and repeating the point under discussion said, he should give no opinion upon it, but should tecommend 'them to find a verdict stating—whether.they believed ,the party to have by his conduct assented t the alters. ,tire in the bond? and declaring that his only object in ask!ng for their verdict on the fact was, that the slues lion of law which be now declined to decide might be raised for the opinion of the Court. . The Jury accordingly found a verdict for the plaits ;tiff, stating that the alteration had been euhsequently assented to. Mr. Sergeant Watts and Mr..Seirgeatit STEPHEN then proposed to tender for exception to their direction, that the Jai y ought to have been distinctly directed to find for the defendant. The Cut as imam repeated his intention.of confining ,theta to complete the preparation r.f the bill of • 'seep-. tiros before the fist four days of nest term. Sarasota Wits' and STEPHEN again intimated their belief that his Lordship could impose no such conditions. The Come JUsTice observed, that the only. opinion he would give in this case was, th at he had such a power. The party to whom the verdict was awarded had a right, by the law of the land, to enter up judgment on the morning of the fifth day of the Term; and he (the Chief Justice) had no power, by coostming to any de lay, to fo leprive him of that tight. The bill of excep tions should either be prepared fully before that day,or -it should be prepared now. Sergeants WILDS and STEPHEN did not consent to bind themselves to complete the preparation of the bill before the time mentioned ; on ohich His Lon:mute said he would have it prepared im mediately, and would stop the proceedings of the Cow t for that purpose. "here was another cause arising out of the same cir rtomstances, and it was Froposed to take a nominal vet diet in that caw, subject to the decision dthe asst. The Clasp Jose= said, that the verdict in the second cause could not be taken, as the Jury were pot 'opposed to have returned their verdict in the first, as a bill el exceptions must be tendered before verdict given. H s Lord hip then stopped the proceedings of the day—the Jut y retired to procure some refreshment —the Chief Justice went into his private room, and the defendant's .Counsel began preparing their bill of ex. eeptionf. When they had thus been engaged for above an hour, a message was conveyed to his Lordship, who immediately returned into Court. Mr. Sergeant %Vitae then observed, that as his Lord• chip's only object, was to prevent delay and injustice, he (Mr. Sergeant Wilde) apprehended that that object might be auained, notwithstanding that Mr. Sergeant Teddy would not consent to torn the facts into a special verdict. All that the defendant wished was to obtain his Lordship's judgment in the most convenient form ; and he, theretore, proposed that his Lordship should direct the Jury to find a special verdict, stating the cif. commence,* of. the case, and the defendant's Counsel would undertake to produce that special verdict to the Court within any time his Lordship might require. By that course the object they had in view would be at; tamed by a shorter aqd certainly a less expensive way. It was the plaintiff's. business to prepare the verdict,. but the defendant's Counsel would undertake aroy re. sponsibility on that subject which his Lordship might think necessary. Mr. Sergeant Tama said, he trusted his Lordship would not concept to direct the Jury to find a special, verdict in this case, as it would be conclusive against the plaintiff, and would prevent him from Winging this cause again before the Court, under more fa vourable circumstance.. So greatly did he feel the disadvantage to be, under which his client would labour, it a special verdict was now taken, that he declared be should feel hisissilt bound to withdraw the record in the nest CUL!, tither 'dean submit to die diffictilties which would t 1 be itapcse4 upon 'his client. He would not say that a special verdict would produce injustice, bat certainly it mold be num locuntreniesst mode o f ad ministering jusside. The Curie Janie laid his day Otject had been to prevent delay and useless espouse. He newer, tin any occasion, bad any Ether wi.h than to pvirent pettier from being interrupted io having their money,wheh i 'by the ordinary practice of the Court, they had a right to have it. Every party hid a right to say he was not eon.: tented with the judgment of the Court of Coanssonflitissi they bad a right to go tetbeCoutt of King'sßench ; sad' if they we v not then sithilett, they inight carry teen cause to'theliciikOlif Lords. Hewished it to be dhtieritlyi understood, that if any parties wished to exercise that right he should be the lair to iittempeto abridge it. 114 .should; therefiat, most readily y dlitikpiethiftiot now Made, which was in fact the same he bad prey an hour since. Ile should dila( t the Jury to fend a +real roerkfict ni the facto, sad whatever the Court or Common 'Wear might determine with respect to that verdict, nrips after wards be carried int the Conic of King's Bench ; 'and if any difference (which he did not expect) should ther would then see-who sr:alight and who was wrong. His Lordship added, le• **et the whole of the e. idence to th e J ur y , and be g them. to" gise him disarm answers with tespett to the facts tithe essei but he.now declared, that he-would MA eclat onelott of the rule he had laid down with respect to the bill of ettep:i tie•ns, but would have the special verdict fully preParcd and piesented. to the Cuwt .within the first four days of Term. His Lordship then tecapitulated the evidence s and asked the Jury, 1 st, Whet her the alter at km had been Thad* in the hond of:er the defendant had executed it? 2diy; Whether that alteration had been made with the pre pious assent of the plaintiff? &fly, Whether it was sub' sequently assented to by the defendant? and 411rhy s Whether the *lteration was made with the assent of the defendant given at the time? The Jury retired for about half an how, and then rewrite:l a verdict for the plaintiff, entwining the tine& flout questions in the affirmatives and the last in the negative. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, Dec. 18. - '-- - THIS SING V. NOR THHOUSI AND Low. This being ti , e adjournment day of these Sessions, the defendants Messrs. Northhouse and Low, who were convicted at she last Sessions of conspiracy and obtain ing by false pretences from Mr. Baldey, a sum of 1(X1. were brought up for judg me , t. When the case was first called on Mr. C. PHILLIPS, the Counsel for the prostcution, begged to observe (in the absence of Mr. llrodrick) that Dr. Sutherland, the eminent and respectable Medical Gentl.man, was in no way whatever connected with this case. Mr. ALLEY their addressed the Court—The Court had been k'nd enough to allow the case to stand over fOr a fortnight, on an application for an arrest-of judgment, and he now begged to renew that application, on the ground that the indictment was wrongly framed; besides which, he had several affidavits in support of his motion. The indictment contained seven or eigla counts, reaching at least as far ai from the Court to Clerktawell Church (s laugh), some of which charged one offence, and some an offence of quite a different . character. It was alleged, in one part of the indict ment, that the defendants had conspired together to defraud Mr. Balder of one hundred pounds, by reprr. seating that Mr. Hume, M.P. and Colonel Tines, were part propri::tors of a newspaper called the Free Press, by which means they prevailed on him to subscribe 1001. another part of tire indictment only all✓ged the defendants had defrauded Mr. Batley of that money ; the fact was stated in two different ways, chrectly opposite, in or e of which they were amenable to common law, while the other was punishable by pe nalty and imprisonment under the False Pretence Act. N.rw, could it be possible for persons to be found guilty of committing an offence two different ways?, The thing was impos.rble. How could the Court- ap portion the punishment? They could not by possibility do it. Mr. Alley then said he was anxious to do a piece of justice to Mt. Hume, whose affidavit he held. The prosecutor, Mr. Baldey, swore on the trial if the defendants, that he neser heard that. Mr. Hume and Colonel lines were not proprietors until the trial of a cause io the Court of Icing's Bench, in July last. Now he had the affidaeit of Mr. Hume, stating that in June, 1827, eighteen months ago, Mr. 11Adier wrote to ask him if lie were a proprietor, to which he replied he was not, nor had he any thing to do with the concern. Mr. DUNN observed drat the object of_thi:i prosecu tion throughout was to make Mr. Hume a ( partner. Mr. C. PHILLIPS observed that the only object was to bring the partners to justice. He begged to say, that as it was clear the case could not be decided to-day, he hoped that Mr. Baldey might be allowed to reply to those Affidavits. Mr. ALLAY proceeded at considerable length, and said on the groulds he had stated be prayed for an ar rest of judgment (in the langpage of the law) sine die. It being understood that the case must stand over, Mr. Alley ,and Mr. Donn applied to the Court to alloA the d. fendants to be liberated on bail. The CHAIRMAN said he had no power to do so—they must remain in custody until the first day of the next Sessions, when they woold be brought up for judgment WINTER ASSIZES. MAIDSTONE, Damsons IS. 'CASS OF Ma. AUSTIN. No less than 18 true hills were yesterday returned by tl.e Grand Jury against this Gentleman, foi embezzling and secreting divers sums of money, the isoperty of his Majesty, which sums had passed into his hands by virtue of the office he then held of Deputy Treasuier of Greenwich Hospital. . The charge i* thus stated in the Kent calendar: " Thomas Austin, aged 55. brought by Habeas Corps. from Ms lisLieltf's gaol of Newgate: committed the 3d of September, 182$, by Mr It, Birnle, Knight, charged on the oaths of Wm. Paine and. others, for that be laid Thomas Austin being a clerk and servant to our Sovereign Lord the King—to wit ' Deputy Treasurer of Greenwich Hospital—did feloniously steal and embezzle themes of .C 12,843 12.. dd. the monies of our said Lord the King. " Detained further charged ma the oaths of Was. Paine and Alert *Mb feloniously stealing and embezzling the sum 014 159. 741. the monies of our said Lord the King, at Greensviele It was espected the pthoner would have beets tali es one or more of the indictments this morning, before Mr._Jostice HOLROYD ; but owing, as.is rumoured, to the witnesses for the prosecution not being all in at. teedance, the Dial was postponed, and now stands fixed Ear eight o'clock to-morrow morning (Fliday). Messrs. HOLLAND and Baonatct have Win retained for the prosecution, and have been engaged in several long consultations win the Hospital Solicitor, Mr. Back. nell, relative,.as is said, to some legal difficulties which the r aies are expected to present. .Messrs. ADOLPHUS, LAW, and CLARKSON are to con duct the defence, and are expected to raise a variety of objections, to the form of the indictment, which are flamed under Mr. Peel's late Act, for more effectually punishing hands and embezzlements by servants.— Among other objections, it is said, it will be urged that Mr. Austin was not a..servanv of the King—that beheld his -appointment under the Treasurer of the Hospital, to whom be gave security, who was responsible for his acts, and by whom alone he could be deprived of his office; and, consequently, if he was the' servant of any. ine, he was the servant of the Treasurer, and not of the lug. The case excites very great interest throughout coentry, and the Court is likely to be very crowded. Before Mr. Justice Boassouon. BURGLARY. Ch ark. Currey, William Benati, John Joma, and Thaw Green, were -charged with breaking into the , house of Mr. William Amer. the sign of the Two 11:sweis at Lewisham, tad stealing therein two guns several bottles •of spi its. and other articles. 'The property was safe on the night c f the 10. h if • t ° • t August, sad early nn thrfallea sag morning it w a relayed tlse'boes*thatt booo•beakeltiruo, st o perey isrqueatiatt stolen. The poOnsiit s yontt, Pls, by a ,erts4b4rian the• sales orinsilng on coennsne. Currey and Jorseoired each ag. ,boulders, end Green had:vbettie of spiri ts u m, (mea-obis)] her busied at the oatcha kt , no being stopped, but icrotristAtely' without Orly. In tile patitetint .14.0114 Was fitund cevtieArit, and a phoeptiormbettle Other articles. wett.iden dbr. Mr. Amer were attetw.rdr the - versant of*the r .iinners. Verdiet.di t ili j , of de‘th rec r.!ed. GUILDHALL. Tsit'young whinges; named' Canteen and Drones wered,_ Mr. Scutt; a slittemaker;vilth stealing four pair of sk im 1 "w1 Theisen ptiforteracam* into Scott's shop on Wedn„ day and :diked to see 's pair of shoes. lie was engaged at !" and ushered the Indies into his parlour. Several pai n and rejected ; and at lettth it was proposed to leave t sure: On goinemit'of the shop they contrived to secrete tit shots. but were observed by the maid servant; sad; were overtaken. • Caution stated that she met a woman in the street her at several public houses - until. she became hitexic.t. s t which she proposed to go into Mr. Scott's to purchase shoes; that it was this woman who took the artieles7 solemnly protested that bet fellow-prisoner was not Hwaswith her. Brown. who wept bitterly, declussl she was pasee t , 4;annon's conspaniun threw away two pair of shun, al I picked them up ; but that she never saw Cannon before • Mr. Scott was asked by the Alderman if be was Brown. He said he bad ne doubt of her, butt was reser, hit nifty of Cannon. The maid servant was positive that Brown was one , An apprentice of Mr. Scott's swore po•ineely , would not swear to the other.—They were both committed. HATTON-GARDEN. The driver and owner of one of the Paddington peered at this office before the. Sitting blagistrates, • S•u.os and Mr. Lawn, to answer to an entormathnt bun by Mr. John Finch, of bnisbury, Sandier, for' Mr. Sergeant•Seeun-1 feel it my duty to fine £6, a penalty that I wveld not have itillicted before, been, at his own request, as a matter of mere with time to bring forward witnesses, which he failed to produce. The defendant appealed, and the !- THAMES POLICR. •The Captain of the ship Rhoda, was charged Morris Taylor, a - tide-ivaiter. The complainant . was put on beard the Rhoda, at Gratrosend r and during up the river. the defendant applied to him the guage and said the Officers of the Custotns wee: Whet:the vessel arrived in the London Duck, on s fondant fel. into a greet rage, because he (Complainant' the quarter-deck, seised-hint by the throat, and ' him desperately. Ilse defendant said, in his defence, not use the violence imputed to hisn i and that the treated him in the most insolent Manner. He was paying the fine, he said, 4 hc.arouki do for Taylor, s'. The complainant said, from this expression,. hensive of personal injury. The defendant was and bail to keep the peace. M A It L BORDU G R.STREET Yesterday information was given at this tact burglary, which had been committed on the the residence of Colonel Watley, at Watford, It appears that Colonel Watley is on a visit , /LP. in Worcester, and the robbers having Obtained . of Isis absence, effected' an entrance to the house by ea. some iron bars from' the kitchen window, and succeeded possession of a chest. containing upwards of £2OO woe which they wheeled off in a barrow to the orchard, (hest and barrow were left, but the plate was carried MAHY-aLA—BONN Dathentia Damp, a young man, was charged riga yesterday worming, with an attempt to murder. T. Whiner, a Mary.la-bonne watchman, stated , ea duty on %Wonder night at the cop of Lower about bah past ten, he saw the prisoner and a young along Crawford street together ' in earnest communes, could not distinguish their words. When they came him, they made a stop, and appeared to be quarrelling, he could cross the street to interfere, be saw ' sent a pistol at the young woman, and Are it. herself round, gave a loud scream, and ran acre+, baker's shop. He immediately took the primmer ' made no resistance, but said, " I am your prisoner" to the pistol, which lay three or four yards distant where it was fired, added, " There is the pistol, , the man who did it—l give myself up to justice. prisoner was proceeding to the watchhuuse be I have dune the deed effectually." The prisoner did not appear under the influence the course of the instate inquired of Harris, the ' " How his dear Mary *as?" alluding to the was conveyed vs she Infirmary. It appeared by the evidence cif Mr. Goodyer, a man, that a piece of lead bad penetrated the owe' yesterday morning eittacted; but bit Citoodyer belted jaw might enstse,or a dangerous suppuration Mr. Gannett inquired it the young woman b ermstww which led to this affair, as at present in mystery. Mr. Goudyer—l understand her name is Mary that her mother resides in Thornton-place, Daher. keeps a sloop. Mr. Gaterm—Did she say that the prisoner dresses to her? g ;e av„: rvi Genti e - itt r Z all tllp t suedh em t doin t A d a c hi ld ! rticia tiv i 44 l rda r ound r 1 4 ig & welts cave" td lII= E s ham 1111 1 'etineig, 7 at the m To e m% pairs woe ' li d, tb": kctlte friar Far Sal Id being Flo ' 614 tend reet who trey i t hin bliC.ird. 4( 4 delis • II „be il ; and it C the p erscs - 7 4 , to met Wag at tlme ti e , xi, mad nut dine in het L. Ifni putative u ls A ti Peadvait od w S e *Ube ve st , a to Cannon, tit iedt omitted nub Joni ngton states, t► tee, Mr. Seq u e l Of glint Ind aging A ~1 furious doo r , M. fine the derendl t tor before, had ke e t stied favour, in t i o l„l I'rk he hot eveatu e 4. parties wahine, ea men rd with awalli g moat stated, tut, during the ea ! , nttyit abusive 4 ni a set of opus. n Tuesday, tee plainatil wee xl heat and kidd efenee, that hog le complain:l4 , y was fined IL h ylor, if he died* lon,. he was app. .as theta (Wads :d ace rip :T. .:ai e of a mots iseig preceding sigia,t la ilenford.ha I it to Colouel lb; lu tallied a kueils ' ec ;se by est:imams ,ucceedeti in WO worth ci pee, orchard, what curled away. A xl before mfr. Ga II murder. 'fed that as be .ewer Sprits:- k aung woman • A anversatios, Ist ry came "paten welling, and Min the Tang oar ' The wont= roll Noes the way NO ter into cintody,M • ioneril and, • • latent trim the • , 01, pick it op—lo slake." While it F : said, " 1 wolf krt sence of Nam. i ' the Night COMA % young WIP 4. • of ti t r inipto;:hi a ttarrnts m dctiel t hsgim d tpouh: i re t t edwd :l ialk: Gt atecluevtebzu llt ot: Mary Martha, sd ker•au eet, ahem y met bad paid his as r few questions I a the pilsoner twos • aver told him that • one he had anvils; • tee, and he was Saw s ware c• id Mr. Melton, - 1-ty to tie smog at the thieves effatel by boring throne tat thrs, and wine, teat the tit= was a body :lied het self ma mow efts were *ran os di their posses.ios; Al! ivesliouse at HOW Aims, and tbediA ' it liresstford. 1 to be doe properf; is company mum' charged, ban dui* , 'L ys beets a great attif , a mighty pert O. ezhatisted !II thew* escape the dire gel' lade the followiegil w ate on Wedocallf a say to the rare an unto nice pot o sectable gentleints body that bas Ku' 10 the charge preftrii Mr. thiedyer—No, site did not. From the to her, I understood that she bad only seen spree times in her lite. Harris, the constable, said that the prisoner Ind two or three other pistols at home, if the one had failed to accomplishing his purpose. The prisoner declined making any defence, mined for trial. • QUERN—SQU A RR. _Age lbw., Gorr Phillips, anti Latin Shar e wits Wog esteemed in robbing the house Uzbrldge, about a fortnight ago, when propert; upwards of 2001.• was stoke. It appeared that in entrance at the back pan of the premises by . sinners with a centre-bit, and stole plate,clotbes, oboe amount. The only person ha the house at the I aseerant,and who waz au trightened that she locked On the morning of the robbery the prisoner* banks of the Canal with some bundles in their were therefore taken into custody. In Shaw" , don were found a port wine bottle, a pair of este* of two coats which had been pledged at longed to Mr. Melton; the *hues also proved Mr. Melton. Raritan was seen in the woman's occasions after the rubbery. Phillips was discharged, prisoners were committed fur trial. GREENOCK POLICE. A drunken riotous woman, who has always saw to the people in her neighbourhood, a mighty Polka of Greenock, and who has long since withstand sum lowers of eloquence - while pleading to escape ." smart of solitary conhoement in Ilridewell, made' crone attempt to ineuence the sitting Magistrate Magistrate—Well, mistress, what do you ' being again drunk and disorderly ? Prisoner—Oh, Sir Beetle, I ha'e made an w. (here she mentiuned the names of two respectable bad already celebrated in verse), and every: 'oar it Is a very bonny piece o' compeain'. Magistrate—Well, but what do you say to the against you? Prisoner—Noo, Sir, If yell say use male about thee:ll4Al try tonsak' an uncommon nice sang about you, for indeed IS deserve k. fit Magistrate (latighinv).--Really, my good woman, I would be boort honourable to receive censure than praise would be more honoulabk to receive censure man pis.... -- , You ; but aa the w itnessea in your case have not come forsrad. lm shall be lodulged with 24 boors' further confinement, which it afford excellent opportunity to cultivate, in private , t he favor the muses. 'Prisoner—Wed, wed, Sir, that's just a' I want; IT kilt l‘ sang ready by that time, if it be at a' powible. The woman then left the bar, apparently highly pleased the merriment her proposal bad made in Court. ____ • GH•WATIIN at LONDON-BKIDGR TO WKItOt Morning • •• . 4ti minutes OW 1 i: Winner . •♦ ettnetus ,tier Lonnowl Printed and Pibliqied him Matas, the Iwo' at the Sue Omni; No I, Pickett-place, Temple Is 4"