Star. — London, England, 1818-04-06 00:00:00

MP'' - agCTIONEERMCI. lhope who of independence loudly boasts Will glee their rotes to those who pay them tatrit ; A golden bait will make them bumble slaves, To (Awn on those they now declare are Wier's! AA Caute rbury, April. IA Washington Gazette says—The call of Mr.. FISYTH, in the House of Representatives, on the I:e,ident, for informatirm relative to the prospect of ant Ostment of our differences with Spain, will be to every enlightened and spirited Citizen of thel.'„ited States. In Get, it is high time to say to the Spa. ish Government, as the lover did to his mistress: novel, in all conscience, you have shuffled and shanaml; s, and be kiss'd—or say to, and be d--.-41." m the right of the French King's Veto was so ly agitated in the National Assenibly, the mob in Lawled about the streets— No Veto! no Veto!" ,sz.to one day acct a woman who was voci- Vhase magic words. " What h the meaning ;Veto," said he, " about which the people are tg so much? I am a stranger in Pans, and do iderstand it." " Oh, Sir," said the itinerant po " it is a tax upon sugar," and on she went, es ling as loudly as before, " No Veto ! 'no Veto !" t the arrival of the ship Pioneer, Wawa, from a Lecne, we find that several cases of murder , urglari hare °centred in the colony. The Pio left Sierra Leone the 29th January. The Slag , WATSON, would be ready to sail for London le Ist of March,; and also the Mary, Manes*, The Preston had arrived at Sierra the 2ith linuary, from England. His Ma i ship SeitittAsits, Commodore Sir JAMES Yzo, Llso anived there, and sailed on a cruise down cast on the 25th of January. , idav afternoon the Isabella ' with 180 male con , sailed from Spithesd for New South Wales.- 1s outward-bound vessels, many of which had L'ALained six weeks by contrary winds, have now on their respective voyages with a fine evtoms Stamps Post-Office Asseswd Tales Land Taxes. :Hiscelliaeous £9,510,211 aCi0,449,207 ./e. :c„ ate of the last advices a report hadreached stated that the troops if the Rajah ,rr. %:t had made an attack upon the British Sub ..v Yorce, stationed at this capital, (Nagpore.) lad, however, been repulsed. Not only &INDIA loz.u.sts remained faithful to his engagements. f a private letter from Calcutta, dated the 18th :ptember, it appears that that place had been ex tely unhealthy, both to Europeans and Natives, le latter of whom the Police Report states 800 to : died daily. Among the European deaths is of Dr. THOMAS CASEY, an Assistant-Surgeon on Bengal Establishment, and Acting-Superinten of the Honourable Company's Botanical Garden. ' The foll Owing is the Produce of the Revenue of tat Britain, in the Quarters ending the sth of 11,ltsl7and18118:. 1317. 1816. -••• £1•819,296 , £2,003,664 4.642,053 1,496,611 349,000 868,104 1 :74 ,SSO 98,595 Aran PrarenT Ter i .0 ,023:7 ti Lit wever Fortune may be arraigned for her fickle ness, we think•to Bisn she has been most constant ; sales in former Lotteries are convincing proofs of is, to which it would seem she is about to super - arid me still more steady marks of her attachment; on ie first day of the present Lottery he sold more than third of all the Capitals that were then drawn; and ipon the second day nearly half, amongst which was the only Prize of £30,000 then drawn. Thursday neat gill be the last day, when the 37 remaining Capitals ust come forth amongst which are Two of £30,000. a former Lottery, that contained Three Prizes of 30,000, it will be 'remembered that Btsx sold them 1, and that then the first was drawn (as now) upon the second day. be Saturday list the Berkeley Hounds, with the permission I the Earl of Harcourt, the Ranger, met in Windsor Great 'ark, where an amazingly large field of Gentlemen and Sports not were assembled. They drew the covers near Cdmberland ..ege, and unkenneDed a fat at Smith's Lawn. He broke corer is very great style, making for Cumberland and Cranbourn Inird, and, taking the pales at St. Leonard's, he crossed the kdowrer by Wiley Green and Five-fields to Winkfield, and leading back towards New Lodge, was killed in one of Mr. Lt.on's coven, after a very severe ran of an hour and ten mi- Mgt, .% better run was scarce ever witnessed, and the whole et the field gave ample praise to the excellent condition and fine running of the hounds. ThjiTly.pshire Hunt meet te-morrow at Newton Common; 1 At Betimes Down; Saturday, Et Northington Down, at ten ea.:lt thy. Saturday night, Mrs. Plower, a laundress in Pim lico, was finishing her ironint to send home : the linen was i on a table in a front parlour. She had accas.on to go into the yard for a pair of stocking;: at her return, she found several articles scattered about the floor, some person having snatched at a pile lying on the table, and ran off with several shirts, &c. FISYTH, ar. s iipstr e t s•,tip, t thr ~tree Spa. ish C r 3 :a° l ;;, When ' re.mly bay i•i vtsatJ f ef ;hi, - V s rot uncle By tl Sierra I arid bur neer left alma, V on the I for Eli' Leone 11 i est y's sr I.ld also the • victs, sa All :he V:211 sir 13i of lies • siziial•F Thev 11: but lam By a of Scpti tremaly oftheL have di that of the Bei dent of • The Great April, etii • sta ti Pe As! has Anewv B( the nen, his sa this, t for tome 6! for the ir ers, ath upon the a vith will roust last lu a 1:30,( all, the s ince d th, Pad, 11101 Led; is .1 gen; Lit New; 62d° oak- bead: Gro- Lt., ITrow Mgt Awls, et a ), far rum dam; ;bra' , iorco at c lice wai ailed Ott at ,ocr . abr Itut lyii and w ent siu and ou raters ou trAgt c, pro- loaded r. OTT!, n with nttenu 'Mira 1 sks of int, In iusse%r am if:aster , ,y brig, le brigs ig, was-0 1 sw ept in bai CORX-EXCH INGE, APRIL I. ASSIZE& SOMERSETSIIIRE. • GIUM CON.—THOMAS V. TIMM. This was an action brought to recover damages from the Defendant, for criminal' conversation with the Plaintiff's wife. The damages were laid in the declaration at 50(X)/. The Plaintiff, Proctor William Thomas, was clergyman, who was born in this county he was a respectable member of that profession. The Defen dant was a physician ; it was one of the aggravated' circumstances of the case, that he was of the medical profession, and that he had attended Plaintiff's wife, as such. He was, therefore, guilty of the More seri ous crime, for in addition to the ordinary rest raints by which the conduct of mer. should be regulate* there was an obligation in consideration of the con fidence necessarily reposed in the profession. The Defendant was also a married man with a family, which should h a revented him from committing an act in which another family would suffer beyond all possibility of redress. It would appear in evi dence, that the Plaintiff was a curate of a portion of the church of Plymouth, and had been obliged to absent himself from home to perform his duties, and that the Defendant took advantage of the situation of the Plaintiff, and paid the visits to her which pro duced this illicit transaction. Both the Plaintiff and Defendant resided- at Tiverton. They were on term of intimacy, and it appears that at the death of Sur- Bridge, who was na the habit of att endin g Mrs. Sur geon Thomas in her accouchement, Defendant was called in to perform the duties of acconcheur. Serjeant Pets., tor the Defendant, said it was not his instructions to attach any levity to a lady who had been mentioned ; but if she had appeared she could have proved a great deal on the part of the Plaintiff, who did not hesitate to leave his wife by herself for weeks together, while he was amusing himself with rural spor,ts. Mr. Justice HOLIOYD summed up the evidence. — The fact of adultery, he said, had been clearly proved ; and the attempt to throw a reflection on an absent witness as to the terms on which the Plaintiff and - his wife lived, had neither succeeded ; nor, if it had, could have extenuated the conduct of-the De fendant, who had taken advantage of his professional opportunities to seduce the wife of his friend. But if any fact was necessary to prove an attachment upon the part of the husband, it was surely that of the offer of forgiveness ; and his conduct was wholly free from reproach when he determined, upon find ing her affections were criminally estranged from him. lie\ et- to see her more. The Learned Judge conclude 3 with observing, that if the evidence of the Lady could have benefitted the Defendant, he could have called her ; but of that circumstance there did not seem to be the slightest probability. The Jury immediately found a verdict for the. Plaintiff—Damages, 20001. LANCASTER, APRIL 1. BREACH Of PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. ORFORD V. COLE, ESQ. Mr. PARK stated, that the plaintiff in this case was Mary Alice Orford, and the defendant Thomas But ler Cole, Esq. The declaration set forth, that in consideration the plaintiff would promise to marry the defendant, he, the defendant, undertook to marry the plaintiff; but instead of so doing, he had mar ried another woman. The defendant pleaded the y general issue. Mr. TOPPING said, the plaintiff was a lady of the age of twenty-nine; She was the daughter of a person whom he had known in early life, Mr. Orford, a sur geon, of great respectability and character, who had hied many years in Warrington: her father was a man in extensive business, and who had besides con siderable real and ms. property. She was one of four children. - In 1810 her father died, and his widow, Mrs.Orfnrd, who had connexions in the town of Liverpool, changed her residence from Warring ton, where she was born, and went to live at Liver pool. Soon after, an intimacy commenced between the defendant's family and Mrs. Orford, for Mrs. Orford was connected by marriage with his family, she being his mother's first cousin. It was therefore natural to suppose that an introduction between these families would take place, and that it would increase so as to become a familiar intercourse. The defen dant, Mr. Cole, whose name was originally Butler, was the OM of a person of that name living at Liver pool. The defendant's father had been once a per son of fortune, but of late years had only an appoint ment in the port of Liverpool. He was what was called one of the searchers in the Customs. In con sequence of this familiarity, intercourse, and visiting, the present plaintiff and Mr. Cole became acquain ted. Mr. Cole had succeeded to a very large for tune by the death of an uncle. He had received an accession of fortune, and the mansion house called Kirkland-hall, in the neighbourhood of Garstang.— The defendant's mother had the superintendence of hi, household ; and the familiarity between the fami lies having been continued, Mts. Butler, in February, P-17, being then at Kirciand-hall, wrote an invita tion to the mother of the plaintiff, pressing her and her daughter, of whom she had a perfect knowledge, to pay her a visit at Kirkland hall, and she accompa panied her request by a statement that it was on the part of herself and her son. Mrs. Orford had been for many years in a precarious state of health, and he was sorry to say, that at this day it was doubtful whether she was in existence : he regretted it the more, because her testimony would have been mate rial for the plaintiff. Mrs. Orford had declined the first invitation on account of the state of her health ; it was renewed, and in March, Mrs. Orford and her daughter having received a second invitation, Miss Orford accompanied her mother to Kirkland-hall, where the mother of Mr. Cole was. She was recei ved with more than polite attention—with all the sincerity of friendship. Every attention was paid to her—every possible civility shewn her. Everything was done to convince the parties that the visit was not only considered as an obligation, but as a source of great satisfaction. Mrs. Butler had long known Miss Orford and her mother. She knew, what no body could deny, that Miss Orford was well educa ted, accomplished, sensible, prudent, and, he might add, a lady of considerable beauty. The defendant's mother seemed pleased with the visit of her two friends, and the defendant, Mr. Cole, appeared no less so. After they had passed some days at Kirk land-hail, there could be no doubt that Mr. Cole had Leccine, and that ldrag before this visit, in love with Having had a very large arrival of Foreign Wheat since this day week, caused dull sale for that of our ova growth, both on Friday and this morning, and our pr ices for the best Eng lish are full 2 s . p er quar t.:clfea-cr ; hut the Foreign Wheat, being of fine t sold very readily at the above decline.— i, Is. per quarter dearer than on last Monday, s al.nng a large sugply from abro a d w hi c h ir..t lel sde to the rnaltsters, on account of its ex (t'it nt qua':r.y.—Oats are Is. per quarter lower.—ln 414 Beans there is little or no alteration. MUSH. Sintil Beans rtar, ISect acd Tick ditto V. ~z Vls 94s Oats, Potalee t:: 1 76s 9'2i Poland lk,ack :Cs sus Feed Flour, per Sack fns Rapeseed, per Last 4:0 .1:32 roaracra. 'Theat, Datitzic 'ed.Tiz.tntre cr 4Fs 524 7ts 46i .5 :21 7 0 . B.i7trs G:ey ti6s 50s Ms 57s COD 'ss Et , ;ls 3.:e 44s 4Bs $7.7 1 711/7ELI) tii ICI 28s 7: :TOL the c ROs 96s T:i~~: 11,7.!in1 , -::it r.d :es :::0, this lady ; and acueeslingly, when Mrs. °dad had 'ph:mounted their Veretict for tied Plaintit —petals. a been one day taking an airing , hi bet carriage, he I Seven Thousand Awn& availed himself of the opportun ity of disclosing his On the subsequent morning, Mr. SCARLETT MCYIPCI eentiments to Miss Orford. This was comfilttnieated for a-rule to shew cause why a new trial should not to both their parents, and was perfectly satisfactory be granted: He submitted his application on tWo to both. Miss Orford remained a fortnight at Kirk- grounds. Ist, That the letters containing the eon land-hall, during which time it was understood by tract of marriage had we beet duly stamped, as be the defendant's mother that her son had been paying had contended on the trial they ought to have been. his addresses to Miss Orford, and that his addresses And 2dly, on the ground of excessive damages. It so paid had received the sanction of both their parents. was upon the latter ground he principally relied. He There could be no doubt on that subject ; and hi the I observed that it was the first in'tance in any similar sequel the Jury would be satisfied that the defendants case, in which damages to such an enormous amount proposals of marriage were with the approbation al had been given. Ile contended, that under all the his father and mother : he stated this without fe ar of circumstances of the eau, such very large damages contradiction. The defendant's father, he understood,' ought not to have been awarded: and he enforced was in Court, and might deny the fact on oath: the his opinion upon that point by reference telhe same introduction, -therefore, to that state to which the topics of argument he had addressed to the Jury, parties looked forward was made with the full assent illustrating his reasons•by adverting to the case of a of the parents of each. From the month of March lady of rank, against whom one thousand pounds up to the Ist of June, the mutual pledges of affec- damages had been given, and also the case of a Mr. tion given by both parties continued unimpaire. l, and Hunter, in which the damages had been to the it was clearly understood that the marriage was to amount c,f fifteen hundred pounds. He likewise cons take place. Here Mr. Topping read a variety of the tended that the case had been presented to a Jury, defendant's letters in confirmation of his statements. whose minds were not in that dispassionatestate which On the 29th of August, to the astonishment of the the ineestigation of such a subject required and was family, and more particularly of the lady, it was necessary for the ends of justice; lie insisted there had publicly announced that this gentleman had entered been an unjust prejudiceereatedthroaltthecouaty into the married state with a lady , of whom he s hould a g ainst the defendant, and this he in ferred from the say nothing farther than that she was the daughter very extraordinary concourse of people assembled at of Mr. Grimshaw, an attorney of Preston. Such the trial ; the circumstances of the case had been the were the circumstances of the present case ; and h e subject of general discussion out of Court, and it was thought that they presented a very extraordinary more than probable, the Jury had not formed theh cue. That the defendant had promised his client conclusion with that cool and temperate reflection marriage, was a proposition to w hich he need hardly ask his Lordship's assent: it was they were hound in all cases to exercise. equally clear that Mr. Justice BAYLEY was of opinion, that the ob she had consented to become his wife. He had , jection of th e Learned Counsel, as to t he letter coin however, deserted her, after having left her the last taining the contract teqniring a stamp, had not the monument of his afections—the letter of the Ist of least validity. Upon t question of excessive &- Jane, which contained no reason that could justify mages, he was likewise of opinion there had not heel his desertion : on the contrary, it was a letter expres- sufficient grounds laid before the Court to disturb the sive of the happiness he expected on his intended verdict. Taking all the circumstances of the case union with her. The defendant was now married to into his consideration, he was not prepared to Lay, another lady, and consequently he rendered it ims that if it had been put to the option of the young possible to keep the promise he had so repeatedly Lady to have received the defendant as her husband and sacredly made to the plaintiff. To use the words in preference to the 7,000/. which had been awarded of the poet to whom hehad before alluded, he had done her, she would not have chosen, to have ccepted him " A deed, which, from the body of the contract had pluck'd rather than damages to that or any other amount the very soul, If, then, it was lit ely that she had the election, she And made sweet religion a rhapsody of words might have preferred becoming his wife, how colds' The question left for the Jury to decide, was, what he state that the Jury had estimated the damages - reparation should be made to the plaintiff in damages for the injury she had received? As far as they was hit her rate than they ought to have done ? the injury fcr which the d;unagcs had been given , could redress her wrongs, he was persuaded they • The injury would ; and he was happy to assure them, that when . description and ample fortune of the defendant. 'they ware considering the amount of damages, they had a bank to draw upon that would ans w er all de- there had been any part of the Lady's c onduct, frot which it could reasonably have been inferred that she viands ; for he would prove that the defendant had a clear income of not less than 8000 /. a year. This was striving to marry the estate instead of the man, that niight have been a ground for saying she w:„ was the Lank upon which the check.of the Jury was not entitled to so large a remuneration in tne shape to be drawn of damages, for she would then have been actinL limited in t heir and he was sure that they would not be eir draft, for he was addressing men on the part of an injured and insulted Lady ; and he was f rom an unworthy motive, which neither t he C ourt or the Jury could have sanctioned. l it, calling upon them to give damages asainst a man, about the case in every point of view, he could so whose desertion of her had been unjustifiable, cruel, nothing upon which to cast blame on the Lady's co and dishonourable. The letters were all proved to have been of the duct. Upon the Ns-bele, he thought he oegin. not disturb a verdict dispassionately given , in a ecar. hand-writing of the defendant, and were read as where, if he had been one of the Jury. he might him evidence. 'self have been inclined to have awarded even larger Thomas Orford, the brother, deposed to the terms j .,,„ ag • The rule for a new trial was accordingt of friendship on which the families had lived, and to r etied: '” " --- the familiar visits which the defendant was in th e +Aft of making previous to, and at the period when the contract in question was entered into. He stated, that in a conversation with the defendant, they had referred to a projected journey to Eyre ; Mr. Orford had expressed his determination to go in time, upon which the defendant said, that it was too early— how would his sister like that ? It would not do for a newly-married man to leave his wife so soon—this was on the 28d of April. The same witness stated, that the defendant had visited his mother at Liver pool, and had been uniformly received in the charac ter of her future son-in-law. The witness stated, he had treated Mr. Cole as his future brother-in-law ; he said, that at his desire, he had handed over to him the wills of his father and grandfather, with a view to an arrangement of the property on the mar riage of his sister, and that the defendant had laid them before his father's Solicitors, Wilson and Son, of Boulton. The witness said, he had never heard the defendant allege any reason for breaking off the match.—Upon his cross-examination, he stated, that the defendant's accession of fortune was rather unex pected, and he believed he had not received an edu cation quite suitable to his fortune ; he had been at school at Ptescot, and had left it in 1816. The wit ness stated, that the wedding was considered to be so near .at hand, that his sister's wedding-clothes were purchased. Witness admitted, that upon the match having been broken off, he had authorised his cousin, Captain Wilson, to call upon the defendant for an explanation of his conduct ; but the precise character of the message conveyed by Capt. Wilson did not appear. The witness never heard that Cap- , tain Wilson had paid his addresses to his sister. He believed his sister, when she wrote letters, wrote a copy first for the sake of quickness and correctness., He had seen a copy of that sort which she had preserved. The certificate of the marriage between the Defens dant and Miss Grimshaw, by the Rev. Joseph Row ley, o ffi ciating minister of Lancaster, was proved by Mr. Jeffries, clerk to Messrs. Orred and Brook, of Liverpool. Thomas Duncan, the Defendant's steward, proved that the defendant's rentals amounted to 50001. a year. James Cropper, of Liverpool, one of the trustees under the will of Miss Orford's father, deposed to the extreme respectability of the family, and gave a very high character of the lady : he had ever consi. dered her as exemplary in a very high degree. Both the plaintiff and the family associated with the first people of Liverpool. Isaac Blackburne, Esq. brother to the Member for the County, bore the most explicit testimony to the character of the plaintiff and her family. With re gard to the plaintiff, he had always considered her as the most artless girl that he had ever seen in his life. He described her as a very beautiful woman, and a woman of good sense and discretion. Her conduct throughout life he believed to be uniformly correct. Mr. SCARLETT addressed the Jury at good length on the part of the defendant ; and Mr. Justice BA's- LEY having summed up, the Jury retired, and, re turning into Court in about a quarter of an hour, Sri! REY—ICINGSTON, APRIL 2. TRE:WASS,.-ELLIS, ESQ. V. SYKES, ESQ. • This was an action against the defendant for tres passing upon the plaintiffs grounds at Cobham, this county, and carrying away certain game, property.—lt appeared that the plaintiff was owner of the park and grounds in the occupation his Royal Highness the Prince of Saxe-Cobourg, Claremont. , The defendant was a gentleman of f tune, and the lord of a neighbouring manor. Th: days after the lamented death of the Princess Char. lotte of Wales, and whilst her remains were in house at Claremont, ti:e defendant entered an closure called the Oaks, for the purpose of killi game. Prince Cohourg's gamekeeper met him, asked him by what autherity he came to shootthei The defendant replied that he was on his o' grounds, and had a right to shoot what game pleased. He said he had three pheasants, and 11. wanted another, and although the gamekeeper warned him off the grounds, he killed a hen pheasant, carried it' away. The Jury, under' the learned Judges direction, founi a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages I s. CROWN SIDE, APRIL 5. Bid, a bock-keeper to the Half M( Inn, was tried for a rape upon Sarah Beach, a of 15, in his own house, 1:o. S, -Prince's-buildi Southwark, on the 4th of March. • Sarah Beach and her mother were examine' great length for the prosecution. The prisoner . dared his perfect innocence, but called no wi - ,n?sse Although the evidence was enforced i3y much , dity and apparent modesty on the part of the females, some doubt prevailed as to the consummation of crime, and the Jury acquitted him. Mr. EVANCE, the Magistrate at Union-hall, committed him only for a misdemeanour, and he. rendered himself in Court just as his recognizani were to be forfeited. He was now charged ag; with an assault on Sarah Beach, and his trial bei: put off till next assizes, he was ordered to find /- himself in 1001. and each of two sureties in 501. John Moor, a drummer in the 14th Regima aged 20, was found Guilty of an atrocious assn, on Caroline Ruddell, aged 9 years, at Witley, or 27th of February last. He was sentenced to years' imprisonment. • MURDER AT GODALMINO. In the course of the preceding trial, George Cliemte a farmer at Godalming, aged ts 7, and William craft, a labourer, aged 44, commined on suspici having, on the 10th November last, murdered Georg( Chennel, the father of the former were brought Mr. GURNEY, for the prosecution, felt himsei liged to apply to the Court to respite the reel lances of the prosecutors and witnesses, en aci of the illness of a most material witness, who) Lordship would find in the Calendar under the of Sarah Hurst, an accomplice. He and his bsoi Mr. HEAT tr, had examined all the evidence case, and whatever might be their opinion, they ' net feel warranted to go before the grand jury withom I this evidence. The affidavits of the medical mai attended' her, and of the attorney for the prosee, :Ali IL R. of 37 id to 4s G,t I N .. ..if. cd is Cd Pork 7.7rab - to _ in—f.'2l7,lsr—fil tee p How—Pi:is 260 114 y AND sTn.tw Lo.AD. £4 to 6 Gs 1 5traw......./.11 1115 to £3 4s • 5 .' 7 C! Rev* ... Cs CG3 to Cs l'ot!tv (d to esri to cd {l 44$ 4E• . . • . , ;• .i 1 .1 1 \ . 1 ! i I ; '. t 1 ,° I I I a ' I' -; 1 • C 0 P . 4 , 1 t 1 1 . • ' s 1 . '. ' . 4 i . ,1141 I k I • a.r t i 2 I e l # ' I a, • h Ls 1 11 1 :1: ‘ '! 4 d Y ie. t. !i i I . at a . ill liii RS le , 1 1 1 t li ‘ f. air . Mil it- he la- en • , he I ase ly, ng nd i , i led '• im mt. . I she ald I .at hat t 1 , !n? the a , 1 , If ' i l: '• "' • DM : she • II l i , l' • , i i ° , (l au, was . i ape ing a a 1 l• l nut nag , see 1 1 " i tr.- 1 1 t... 1.) 1 .. , nl-e • arn- a I ia, 1 *Zr: agly l i• l. 40 ' I. 1 ‘.. i if 1 l ' . . lies- 1, in 1 his the ;k ,1 .. k. not . ;,.. at ~; a i tor- I 1 I hree har- - `i, I the ''.''• • , i in- ~. 1 v . Ming a and ' t a i sere? I O'S' 11 4 ' . ( le he 4. , . ad he lined 1a . 4 q a , and , i , K . , . 7 ound • 1 . . • n \ oon I a girl I - . • kings, i \ 1 . I led at cr de- it il tae , . t . ..r-•.:- t males, l ' • of the . i l . 7 I, had . • ' i 4 i ' • le sur- zances i again '.' being d bail, 1 . iarent, ii assault • on the o two i 1 . home!, .4 I Chug- . cion of A 1 ~ Licorge ' I ht up. , , , self ob- ' e c e g ni- .4, '• LCCOUIIt ..; tom his t e name ', • avother, of the . bey did without ", 7 man who ecution s ....•