Star. — London, England, 1828-04-22 00:00:00

.. ' ~. bot with those, he Alight say, who were most materially mediately interested in supporting the Church— ill* - he Resetend individuals who assisted the House in its eliberatio ns—and he found that they werel dis posed to approve the Bill upon the table, because the paising of it would promote religious peace—(Hear). Tis ans another and a very important groond on which he recommended the Bill to the favourable con sideration of the House. He admitted that for about . two hundred years the religious peace of the country had been preserved ; but when Parliament was discuss ing the best means of preserving the Constitution of th.e country, it surely was worth while to inquire whe- ther any, and what changes, in what had been deemed the securities of the Church, could safely be made. 'Vith regard to any objections to details, he, and no doubt the House, would be most happy to attend to the propositions of Noble Lords, the object being to snake the plan as beneficial as possible. All he requested was, that no unnecessary alteration should be made, more particularly in the salutary spirit of the measure. (Hear, hear.) The Earl of HAREWOOD expressed hit surprise that during the progress of the Bill through the other House of Parliament so little repugnance was mani fested by the country. It appeared to him that both thecOuntry and the Government had been taken by surprise. He could no: ascribe the numerous Petitions of the Dissenters, after an uninterrupted silence of 35 or 0 years, to any real feeling of oppression, and he was utterly at a loss to account for them. He was de cidedly of opinion that a declaration might to be fronted including an assent to the Christian religion. . The Bishop et LLANDAFF was inclined to approve of the amendment proposed in the existing law, as far as related to the Church of England, and did not see in what way tharof Scotland was involved in the Ties don. Our ancestors adopted such measures as they - thought suited to the circumstances of their times; and he could not agree with the Noble Baron (Holland), that the Corporation and Te.t Acts were measures adopted in haste, and in consequence of dissension. Those measures were framed, it was true, in times of danger, and the object was to guard against present evils, and against a future recurrence of them ; but the aspect of affairs had since totally changed ; the then prevailing hostility to the Church . Establishment was at an end, and the principles out of which the securities arose now warranted their repeal. He admitted that' , the terms of the declaration required serious reflection, and he was inclined to think that either an oath, or phraseology equivalent to an oath, was preferable to the form at present inserted in the Bill. The party qualifying for office ought to promiseiaithfully to main• tain the rights and privileges of the Church, and not to employ the influence, power, or authority he might thus acquire to assist in its subveriion. He was aware that this was not the proper occasion for entering into these details, and would therefore postpone further al lusion to modifications necessary for the Church and `csseutial to the safety of the Bill. - The Earl of HADDINGTON supported the Bill.— He must contend, in opposition to the argument of the Noble and Learned Lord, that the Church of Scotland • was as inseparably connected with the Constitution of Urea' Britain as the Church of England: The Act of Union, which si cured the inviolability of the one Church, • equally secured that of the other. - His opinion of the : Church of England was, th at no Church ever existed which less required artificial security. The Earl of ELDON admitted that he did say the . . Church and State formed the Constitution, but he did not intend to exclude the Church of Scotland. lb* gad of HADDING TON explained. Lord COLCHESTER would vote for going into the Committee. It was an oppression upon the conscience . of a Clergyman of the Church of England to be liable tta be ca.led on to administer the Sacrament to any person whatever, without reference to his fitness. .He -entirely agreed with the Right ltev. Prelate that the declaration contained is the Bill was a sufficient pro ' tection to.the Church. He thought it would be more advisable for Parliament to determine finally in respect . to what offices it should be required, than to leave this 1 • for the deterniina , ion of the Crown. . Lord REDESDALE opposed the Pill, upon the ground that it was incoosistent to require oaths and tests from the Monarch, and yet to leave him at liberty to appoint to all offices persons without reference to their • religions opinions. . - ~.-. War Lordships then went into Committee on the Sill, the Earl tiLiimaresamlor in the Chair,. . The Preamble baying been read-- . es the clam emit* the declaration on the taking of once, The Earl of ELDON Moved as in•amendment, that thine persons, being members • of the Church of Eng . laud, who, on taking office before the Bill, may have taken the Sieramental Test e lhould not be required to make the declaration proposed in the Bill. The Earl of CLARENDON thOught the Noble and Learned Lord% Amendment - unnecessary ; not that be 'conceived any Noble Lord could' object to make ' the . , Declaration ; but as it was the object of Ministers ' l and of Parliament to preserve the religious peace of:the , . country, he mast object to the clakise as creating a'dii tinction between the Prorestatit middle Dissenter which • . was calculated to disturb that pitsee. He wished that 'there should be no difference made between the M'eni ' hers of the Church of England and the' issenters. The' . latter gave the House a solemn assurance that they . would not use the ix wee of Office to injure the Esta . -. blished Church. The those ogito depend on that' assurance, and loot W1044E214 misting difficUlties,. nor to widen the irruraidistisitiOns,butvather to place • • . the Members of the Church and - the Dissenters on the arise religious footine in regard to - the State: • ~____. The Earl of H A RROWBY was of opinion that' the " , - No_lite and Learned Lord (Eldon's) A mendment *was' - ' 4 ::: . • 'dui . el tele.. s but he rejoiced that the Noble Lord bad i * d it, en account of the bearing t would haienn • .tr• uture parts of the question ? - The Noble and Learned "'Lord had said it was hard to require those who had taken the Sacramental Test td Make the declaration.— .` Now, that mode of argument involved * We Concession `• • that the Declaration was a greater iectirlif than the ' Sacramental Teit—for if the Sacramental Test was a 1 - .. , stronger measure, what objection could the taker of it .. litre to make the Declaration proposed - inihe 'Bill ? . ' . " • The Earl of ELDON thought the declataiioi in itelf '''. ridiculous as a security, but the object of hit - atieudmini ...• was, not to exempt the Dissenters frorntaking that do: ' . - elire ton, such is it.was, but to except those takers of •••• • • .51 Gime, who being of the Church of England , hid taken . ~ • , . , Are Sacramental Test before that, on accessiotrto a for s* office, as in the case of such persons, • thelsre .. vioui .' 4 ...rtaking of the Sacramental Test ought to lit'corisidered ' 4 sufficient security.... • ''''"The Bishop of CHESTER contended,ihietbe Noble' -.4t - NM Learned Lord was not consistent in irk present .ssts , • ~ puree. The Noble and Learned Lord hairs the - outset u:',ensided - the Sacramental Test, yet now by pr esent his iv. arise rislment that same Noble and Learned Lord would' -- escempt persons acquiring office from taking any Test' , .at - an. . it was -well known that few Dissenters coinmud. cased with the Established Church, and when any of them came to communicate, the Clary knowing that • • titsoiljes - ' • "r 1 efirt ktpotifachyal colltellunfoo , D 6 re.igiout .ee ing ; mast necessarily hatatialtiei7 tailiatantly on the occasioni the Earl.or ETAION ibetendgliitirgewas as eon:. sistent as OW Noble and Re verend Prelate. The object of his intendment was this—suppose a Noble Person, such as the Noble and, rend Prolate, to.have taken the Sacramental Test o his first accession foal:ace, 'then 'suppose "the 'sage Noble and•lieverend prelate to bere moved to a. higher station than the ,present•A laugh) —his (Lord Eldon's) amendment went to exempt such Reverend person from the necessity of making the de claration, as the Sacramental Test which he may have, formerly taken outfit to be held a sufficient - security. The Bishop of CHESTER did not think it fair in the Noble and Learned Lord to imagine a hypothetical case, where there was no foundation for it in matter of fact. As to the supposed change of situation to which the Noble and Learned Lord had alluded, the declare firm did not apply at s ell, inasmuch as no'test was re quited of the persons (Bishops) on whom the Learned Lord's hypothesis was directed. After a short mutual explanation between the Learned Lord and the Rev. Prelate, the Amendment was put to' the tote, and nega tived without a division. On the teadlogof the next clause imposing the declaration, Lord REDESDALe. declared the clause was ridi culous, The House was acting in ,direct opposition to the Act of Settlement, by which the succession to the Crown was limited. The present Bill was an absolute absurdity. The House had bound the King by an oath to be a Protestant; yet, by this Bill, they allowed every one of his Officers to be of a different religion. That was the entire object of the Bill. The clause was then passed in the sifirmative.—.-On the clause containing the declaration, The Duke of WELLINGTON proposed as an amend ment, that, after the words " I do solemnly," should be inserted the followirg words, st and sincerely, in the presence of ALMIGHTY GOD, profess and testify." The Bishop of LLANDAFF moved that, to the fore going amendment, should be added the words, " and on the faith of a Christian." Besides, as the Church of England was connected with the Constitution, it was but right to require of persons taking office in the State to uphold the rights and privileges of the Established Church without reservation . or scruple. Fur this reason he should propose the introducti^n of the following words into the declaration—" In all that concerns the office which I take I shall respect and maintain the rights of the Established Church in this kingdom." The Earl of CLARENDON suggested that one amendment should be disposed of before the other should be proposed. The Marquis of LANSDOWN said that it was com petent for the Reverend Prelate to put his motion as an amendment on that of the Noble Duke (Wellington). Lord HOLLAND stated, that though he saw no nucessity for any alteration of the declaration as it stood, he had no objection to the amendment proposed by the Noble Duke. After a few words from the Bishop of LANDAYY, The Earl of ELDON said, he intended to move that in place of the words "I declare," the words " I swear" be substituted; he should also propose that the maker of that Declaration should state that he believed in the' DIVINE authority of the New Testament, and promise that he would not use his office for the purpose of injuring the rights and privileges of the Protestant Church; yet on the general question he was convinced that after the total repeal of the Indemnity Acts, the Declarations even on oath would go for nothing. By the rights and privileges of the Established Church be intended to specify the rights and privileges of the Bishops and the Clergy. Lord TENTERDEN was of opinion that the amend ment of the Noble Duke might be well considered se paratele from the others. The words proposed by the Negate Duke should precede the declaration whatever it might be; they would impart greater solemnity to-the declaration. As to the form of the declaration, be (Lord Tenterdeu) entirely disseived from it. The question was then put on the Duke of Wellington's Amend ment, anti carried in the alEimative. On the next Amendment, namely, the introducing the words and" 1 declare on the faith of a Christian," muck confusion ix cerred;from the circumstance of several Peers siring to speak at the same moment. The Earl of ELDON said, that he did not think the declaration, as amended, sufficiently solemn. He should then. lot e move that the word " declare" be left out, and the word " swear" be substituted. Lord GREY thought that the House should divide on the amendment of the Noble Lord, whether the word swear should be introduced after protest and testify, be fore they coold 'come to that of the Noble Bishop, for the introduction of" on the faith of . a Cluistian." The Bishop of LL A NDA FF said that the word sweat did not meet the intention of his amendment. His ob ject was, to introduce a declaration 'which cou:d only be made by a Christian. Lord TENTER DEN thought that the proper course was to put the question, whether the woid swear should be substituted for declare? Lord ELLENBOROUEIH thought the House 'was wandering altoge.her from the original question. They were introducing amendments which were totally unnecessary, and could only tend to render the question extremely difficult. He would beg their Lordships 'to consider, what were' he practical disabilities under which the Dissentershad laboured for the last seventy or eighty years. Had they not,in.reality, been permitted to enjoy the benefits of the constitution without taking the Sacramental Test? They, now came forward at the end of nearly a century, during which they had proved their loyalty *to be unquestionable, and claimed their right to the enjoyment of those privileges; not by An nual Acts of indemnity, but by the total repeal of those Acts,which they justly considered were insulting and de 'grading. His (Lord E: s) wish was to conciliate ; to esta blish that religious peace to which' the Noble Duke had referred. He would show all that loyal body, that the Legislature were determined to extend to them their confidence and protection. For this reason, he would vote for the Bill as it at present stood.- He intreared their Lordships not to be led step by step, so as to alter altogether the nature of the 13i11—(hear)—not to' convert a measure which was intended as an act of grace into one which would display in every line jealousy and sus. 'Ficion. It was true that many amendments had been imposed; to the nature of which it was impossible to object; but be would oppose them because he considered 'them unnecessary —for instance, the Declarationot the :Noble Bishop on the faith of a Christian, was one wbich 'no one could refuse to take, but did it not •esaaress doubt andjealousy of those who had shown themselves ,undeserving' of auspitiOn for the last century?' There was -sufficient • s'ecuiity at present against permitting' 'those to hold offices *kb were profe ss edly hostile tO: re. .I!genni - Bribe Act of•the oth and 10th of Willianitl3, any - person who professed'a belief in more Gobs than one, or denied the truth or divinity of ••theScriptifies, was immediately obliged, on the professtion• ot• such belief, to retire from any office which he' might hod in the State. This he (Lord E.) considered ittSeleht to meet every objection which might be made; security on security had been already given ; and why, he weld 1 . . . . seat is: coo ,r ers a measure * eke w e e weeded:ileac ran concessions which had been made in the same s i , . 'itiCulor , The Earl of WINCHELS EA then waived that tl ,'not 'fire the purpose of . objeetln , g fo . O s ‘ ct or grieve, into one IX knifed:en snap insnl . r? - ilei With which they had been g iven. ds is in the presence of ALutonvi Goo , and of E to defeat the intention of th& Bill. The E arl of LAUDERDALE objected ti s th e intertio 'The Bishop of LLAND AFF ex p lained. The eliebdinent, but merely to. m enet their any a ihfdships npi.: Ala- gisar S DS 'our SAVIOUR 3esus Cnatsee' be in s etted. ration which he proposed to insert, certainly or -the - words 14 as published by authority ;" the recta, b& said Up exclude those who were not of the Church o sign was so vague that it might mean any thing. The B'sh I CHES•I'ER suggested that the word • Wald e and ifften they were willing to make sat. might Ire-ea belief irtlft&teri pt °rev= heir: 3 -the Old an cdncesaions .as werecontained in the Bill at present could tw il l . ' . , 0p 0 Amendment to a New testainenteeesie received be the Prottitant Churl p t ion whichion but n o Chr i stian reasonable The Earl of WINCHELSEA referred to the amen w be the revelled WOrkof Gore be ta g a te House, inreturn it could object. * a w declaration ' Thelltil of MALMESBURY expressed his concur- The Bishop of•CHES • PER expressed his hope that ranee in the clause, inasmuch as it appeared to him to ment he had tteproeose, when strengthen the security of the Church; and to exclude . division; as he would oblige the Right Rem. Prelates to the Unitarians and others, whom he did not consider as the Noble Earl would not press his vote against it, a circumstance which, on 'tech at subject, Dissenters or as Christians. would be unpleasant to Aherne The Herne Lord TENTERDER thought the Act did not make much , as possible to. abstain . from dogrrene a sufficient - distinction between . those who bad in their thought it could not but satisfy every considers , hands - the government oltotriss corporate; and persons bee of the Established Church, if each perenn - holding offices of another description. This distinction to fill any publieoffice, were called upon to was recognised in the two Acts which by the present .belief in the• Scriptures, received by the Bill it was intended to repeal. He thought it desirable Church. as the ground of his faith. that members of corporations should be either members The Earl of WINCHELSEA - said, his object of the Church of England, or persons who had no exclude from offices of all kinds persons Who objection to attend the service of that Church. wining to express their belief in the funtleunent; The Earl of HARROWBY differed in opinion from trines of our faith. . the Noble and Learned Lord. He thought that if any The Earl of CARNARVON sa i d , if th en . danger Were to be apprehended, it would be greater in should, in an evil ho ur . ado p t the ameniessiele the case of perions filling other offices in the State, than ' Noble Duke, he for one should oppose the in the case of officers or members of corporations. He 'case, instead of providing for the safety of contended that the Test and Corporation Acts were the House would bedeclaring that the Serie OM' never intended to confine the qualification for office to •be received•according to some • established bona fide members of the Church of England; for when it was well known that opon the doctrines l't the latter of these were passed, there were fifte•four there were a vast variety of opinions. Dissenters in the House of Commons, fifty-two of Lord CALTHORPE said, that she held whoni bad recently taken the Sacrament according self the best security—that security which to the forms of the Church of England. He did not the value of her articles, the purity of her object to the Declaration, but at the "same time, he those Scriptures which formed the boasted should have been free from apprehension if the Bill had of her faith... Fors this reason he would passed in its original shape. The protection of the better pleased if the Bill bad been adni. Church of England was the excellence and purity of her simple form in which- it was sent up Flom doctrines, and the learning and virtue of her Prelates elcuse. The Established Church was now and Clergy. Would it be inconsistent in any man, after ophainn of all classes—and at no time war taking the Sacrament in the Church cf England on the cordially hailed by the Dissenters—and fin Sunday, to sign a Petition to Parliament for the abOli- plies which it drew from the Universities, i Lion of Episcopacy on the Monday ? Ile did not believe to stand higher than ever in the estimation o it would. The declaration said in express terms, what He considered, therefore. that it required could only be inferred by a forced inference from the It should be remem'sred that; in the other acceptance of the Sacramental Test, that the person the dissenters Might be supposed to have so accepting office would not employ the.influence of his the Bill bad passed with a large minori I office to the injury of the Church. He did not, however, while in this House, where no such cheer nst attach much importance to declarations; when the oc• exist, and where the• Heads of the Chur. rh casion arose, when* the passions were etched, and the supposed to have considerable weight, the judgment warped, they-seldom proved a very effectual received with cordiality almost amounting . restraint upon the conduct of men. He hoped the declaration would be so ce, tali The Bishop of DURHAM said that the omission of to destiny the twofold benefit that might ii re any declaration of belief in Christianity had excited a benefit to iT.e.t)issenters and to the Establ i alarm in marry minds. He regretted that the Noble Lord REDESDALE said, that ever) Earl should have supposed that a desire had at any that had been proposed appeared to him time existed in the Church to depend upon legislative matter worse. The law supposed that enactments f. tees et pport. officer was a member of the Established The Earl of HA It ROW BY, in explanation, said, that surely then the better way of • determine he had not in the least intended to reflect on the Bench would be by the administration of the Sec, of Bishops ; for, on the contrary, he thought that by the than by questioning about particular course that Body had generally adopted, they had shown would be preferable that each candela the spirit of concession, which he was not only glad, should thus show himself to bee member I but had expected to find amongst them. The' Duke of WELLINGTON said, A moved the insertion of the clause which I The Earl of CARNARVON opposed the Amend- the House, he bad hoped it would be r meut. The Le gislatute had already gone much too far unanimity ; but he feared this would not be in the multiplication of oaths. he was aware it was.objectionable as rega The Bishop of CHESTER reminded their Lordships, of the army and navy. It was not now that by the Amendment of the Noble Duke the decla- explain why; but by his amendment, ration now contained the words in the presence of Ale Catholic Officers might be excluded froms suottev Gon. He did not think any additional solem• He would therefore propose the insertion ot nity necessary. prehensive sentence, which he conceived The Earl of ELDON briefly replied: the declaration quite as much the effect he desired. The Om was not a declaration by any means that the patty would meant to insert were, after the word" dell.; make no attempt to invade the rights and privileges of the tine faith of a Christian" the Bishops acrd 'Clergy of England, which was included A desultory conversation then arose as to the pa in the Oath they imposed upon the King on his Corona. porno: the amendment of the Earl of Winchelse• a , tion, although they now said, that to require an Oath :reintegiaariett A x e . Nwobastr .4 Ea uS Ws adme t hnda t nt thecomin n dgl'oei 'k from any other man, was a degradation to him. The future stage of the 130 or be proposed to a c ils fr isoi Annual Acts of Indemnity were not in opposition to the "declare." principle of the Corporation and Test Acts ;on the con- Earl GREY said, the object of the eirohl trary, they recognised and perpetuated that principle, to obtain au acknowledement of the 1)1' senile at the same-tune they were acts of .neace, inciem• &moult, which, as the House had decided , nifying the Dissenters so long as that could be done the word "declare," could not now come in with security. - He had been toe long accustomed to word. He thought the better plan woub the administration of justice not to be sensible of the the sense of the. House upon the amendreveni difference upon men's minds between an oath and a by the Noble Duke, that the words es upon simple declaration. a Christian," should follow the word •" & The Bishop of BATH and WELLS preferred a his mind, however, it would have been better Declaration to an Oath. He was anxious that this Mee- the Test and Corporation Acts, and more sure of peace should pass in the - spirit of peace; at the vantage of the Established Church to have same time he trusted it would not be taken as an un- them, resting for its security upon the - kindness towards the Dissenters if he said that he thought doctrines, and the examples of the lives , se'rne words recognising Christianity, such as these, "In ters; these would have been better sear the name of our LORD and. &imam J e s u s c elest a any which the Legislature could have prof should be-introduced. It would be disgraceful to this such securities the Church of Ireland I Heuse, and to a Christian Legislature, if such words that Church was not exposed to any dot ts ere objected to. _ it were so exposed. it was only by a series of The Marquis of LANSDOWN opposed the amend- laws which made the g reater p ortion of tei , ment, and in a speech of considerable length supported that country enemies of the Established CI confessed that the the principle of the Bill. He thought the Declaration anxiety which the Noble . as now very properly amended by the clause of the head of his Majesty's Government had m. Noble Duke, was• sufficient, and Noble Lords who meet this question fairly and liberally hi' creased his confidence in the Noble Duke's thought otherwise appeared to forget that this was a tion Declaration added to many oaths now admini s te re d to .He thought that means might be found b persons taking office, by virtue of Acts of Parliament reconciling all parties; and he considered that the Noblyl , already in force, and in all of which the belief of Chris- Duke had judged well in deeming it inconvenient ". press his first amendment, and that the wads eup t tianity was distinctly included. As this was th e case , the faith of a Christian" would be far preferable. he thought the simplicity of the preient Declarati on one 0 - its greatest recommendations. He begged to remind felt that it would be more likely to pass the Babe'. Ireland previous to the French Revolution, and as no unanimity. The Noble Doke could now put his ante! meat, which might perhaps satisfy the Noble Earl, evil consequences had resulted from their repeal in th a t country, he thought that no danger could result from whose proposition he (Earl Grey) would decidedly a similar measure in England. He denied that these ject, as destroying the objects of the Bill. Acts of exclusion were any part of the Constitu- The Bari of SHAFTESBURY then pot the quest;on art, tion. - The means devised by Parliament to support ,d amendment,rei„ of the Duke of Wellingt on , v i z , th at a 7te - t''e ! the words " upon th e true faith of a Clizitt , Llit , . the Constitution, were not a part of the Constituion. inserted. ec But it was a fundamental past of the Constitution Lord HOLLAND sai •d, he would hare preferred ' 4 chat every man who bore allegiance to the King, the Test and Corporation Acts should have beta was free to serve under that King. The King was pealed without d • any declaration, or, at all events, se j the head of the Church, and in constant communion as simple a declaration that ' b as inserted in the Bill eta with it, and this was its best security, and not exclusive was sent up y the other House of Paltament, to declarations',O. or teas, which were only vain artificial he felt no objection, and whichet ob . ected :0' props to what derived its strength from the depths to any, either in the House " i '' ' ''' or out of the House. .t)•,. which it struck its-roots in the affections of the l peop e. I'n g that the amendment now proposed by the ) 0 . . Mt. - Howe theidivided upon the question that the word " de. Duke met the approbation of their Lordships, 1.:. 1 dare" wand part of the Bill. disposed to acquiesce • in it so far as not to pr s' viy r Caetenteett—Non-Contents, 100—Majority against the Amend meat, 68. position, although he could not have the pleasuto saying " con " tent. On our readmission to the Bar, we fou n d that the The Earl of ELDON wished the House to rerolle Duke of WILLIXGTOX hod proposed an amendment to the effect that each person making the declaration that before the Noble D u l : e had intimated an! int tion of moving this ame n dment, he (Lord Eldon) should also declare his belief in the Old and N ew T es - tament, as published brenthority. pressed his desire of moving the insertion of word' the same effect • to which considered that no I TheArehbiskoppf.PAßlC was addressiagehe House. e• h !want, whether Dissenter or not, could object. It a He felt the greatest satisfaction at the result whi c h h a d in d ee d, his intention to have proposed the words svh. tak en lace and he p 0 hoped the Dissenters would receive the Noble Duke had withdrawn, He would absu the i n se Lof 11Wi a hk • assi Arm •.d hum aid --, to oughl as add iticing. He Chi' tera , e Metu. LOr 'n appninced said I declare his the Psotelant mai was ri : r ee tv e L n i t O t ‘ hral wa s na dot. a I s i . , .IE7: Yh AodPu- u , Ph o are um. anent of * that .Bill. I, 1 1 4 to it the Chu, then slates bhool . wor /nits, wi n • tell; itlf Scrip ! t ,3 r r i f c ci ii i gu e hn e h d d l i , e an d t a ti l • oa ll i n V d :t i Os I have • PI" 4 'l ed in i t wad iirt rc t).l ::: nwiao t t g h at s e srahe vicein o ,:iskt r tia l t e : i ~' . , Cho h ja A uv i ) 4 i he p eople auol 11.:use vshe; a s s:: i c l e ‘ c d : ' °tbhi:Tiil but are idiom Efi ' ch might ' I don the r to tin ‘nini . —Ai salified as , T 1 iv expect. ".o f ", ished Ch " T i n. I • amend :` ' the 1 to make . Tt every 01 . ' lb ' Church, 0 .• u P TL °I tg this poi , lament, rat' ioctrine.; Ift to f or o fi tl i s i tt the Chun- ia sks ehen he h . . Orde to had put All eceived r.i .* - Cur "' be pri the case, ar Sir 11 ded Other etc. a nece,smy: - Sir the Roma ‘ "' m in ns the scrvic . num - 0 more rot by G u mild hat Di 'mirth he it P rese , aar e " .... _ , . • u .. aucls Tam iropriety of • be pr a; the difTwo M: before the irri in th rot be put .1 G re .• before the vil Si, I Cub, ohle Earl la lavas ivinity of :t pk T l ', don adop* ~ sc l: in befot e :it g , hil ld be to tiir Tam rear prOpOr , Co Catbo n the falai: tub I eclare: : I • _. Q , !tier to rep . . .Pan, e to the z . 14 - Cirdi awe repeal!. • ‘ _ si purity of . 4 beid of its Mict is. , pen !curities tin oposed. .0 it : had rcted 111 Inger ; or, i 4 per,ecutio Pith tte people C • , co l : Church. II I i iiuke at tb *et manifested I a lad much la Ism 'a a found uist b l . • 12 i 1111