Star. — London, England, 1809-03-16 00:00:00

rIaI4mENTAR r PROCEEDINGS. 1 1IYSE Of LORDS, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 15. 'stsneal Indemnity Bill, aid the Sugar Duty Drag/back fiat thrriugh a Committee. ' WALSINGHANI moved the second reading of the MU- I. ROSSLYN said, that he understood the bill 'Outlined new clauses. He was net aware, that these clauses con any provision to wi . .ich he should feel it his duty to object.; thought That the bill biiklit'not - to go through its 'stages . some ettplanarion of them. Re therefore wished the se reeding to be postponed until some one of his Majesty's Mi were present to give such an esplanation. . suggestion was acceded to, and the second reading was Iponed until toArorroW.—Adjourned. HOUSE. O/F COVMONS. (awaited *l'hamer Bridge Bid ivis 'read a'sectili t i 'date. 'ETER MOORE shortly OpPosed tile bill, ind 'preiseetted ions agaii.st it ; the One from fad Splendor, and At ant the proprietprs of Battersea Bridge.; wbich were referred to the Committee on the bill ; and leave was the petitioners to be heard by Counsel at the bar. person from the COrnmissfoners of Customs presented an of the real value of all exports from England to .me ' the Wrest Indies, for three years, ending the 10th of Oc • .COOPER presented in account of the interest paid tribequer Bills for three years, ending the sth of January .—Ordered to lie on the table. WARD give notice that he shouTd move for the Navy Es rt the Committee of Supply, on Monday. !f-fARLEi POLE postponed till Tuesday his notice which to-ttioreow. 'ARNELL postponed to the same day, his motion re. the assimilation of currencies between Great Britain and MILITIA COMPLETION. 4 CAieItEIEAGIi, pursuant to his notice, IhritiaVe btin in a bill to complettto its full - the militia of Great Britain. He said he . unnecevitait to go then into any minute detail. .e should - there ore only possess the Mime of 'the object of his bill: it was to replace the number of mi littamen rendered defective by the operation of the bill of last session, 'for allowing the soldiers of the militia to volunteer into the hoe. The number al ready so straniferrea. was about 2:3,000, and what he ...proposed *as to raise in their place a number of truths squat to one half of the whole quota for the country, namely, 21,000 men, within twelve months, from an early day, tObe named in the bill. Eight months to be allowed - for raising the men by bounties of ten guineas pfr man, tO be paid by the public ; but at the end df that time, if the rhoie 'should-not be raised, 'then a ballot to take ,*l--e in the usual way for rais ing the remainder, *iffi'aifallotiance to each balloted man of ten guiniiitinisitrili - diet:Hilarity of a substi tute, if he shottkl - notwfsh . toietiftin person. At the lame time, * privilege:A(4'g Kolbe allowed to his 'Ma. jesty, in case of any'rtsenatee of tlAngerai ere Country, to direct that the ballot teilgitt=prOdeed without delay... In the interim, he shboldpfopose' that ari advance bed .Made of about two gulneasiter tnanonwards the 13ences of carrying on therecruiting service. He had to doubt that a considerablenuniber of men might! "be raised in this way, and he hoped, in a manner .2:1;:: lisfactory to the country, as there *as no pressing ne cessity at present to expedite the raising of the public force, and as the mode would be bun onerous upon individuals. He by no means, however, wished to have it understood that the principleof ballot was to be laid aside, although he conceived it was desirable 'not to resort to it withoin urgent necessity. After some observations from Lord TEMPLE, Lord • MILTON, Mr. &taw Lkervitt, Colonel BASTAIIn, Ca. tone! FRAN/CLAM). and Colonel CALCRAFT, leave was, -oven to bring in the bill. Lord Castlereagh preset.. ted it accordingly. It was read the first time, and or- tiered for the second reading on Monday next.' ntrstt erdoc sew. The House rest ved into a Committee on the Mes tion of Mr. .I.'OSTER, to consider of the expediency of encouraging, by bounties, the saving of flax seed, , the growth of Ireland. Mr. FOSTER. observed that this was a subject which very nearly concerned the very existence of the linen manufacture in Ireland. For although the flax which supplied that manufacture was almost wholly' .the growth of Ireland, yet Ireland was indebted:for the seed to an annual supply from America, Holland, and the countries in the Baltic ; the consequence of which was.a considerable failure in the supply of the last year. It was desirable to obviate, if possible, such failure in future, by rendering Ireland indepen dent of other countries for her supply, by encourag lug, as much as possible, the saving of the home grown seed. This he thought would be best done in the first instance, by allowing a certain bounty per bushel upon all seed, the growth of Ireland, so saved, to be disbursed under the direction of the Linen Board; and he concluded by moving, that it is expedient to de vote a sum of 20,0001. on the present year for that purpose, which was agreed to.—Ordered to be repor., ted to-mono w. 4 ..tc• 'Li HOUSE of "rho Manua 1 *lll, went thrOu • Lord WALSI tiny Bill. Lord ROSSI several new clad taincd any provi iwt he thotrght • without some eo oond reading to islaters were pre This insggesti ostponed until The Vauxhall Mr. PETER ,two pithions other from the • Yead, and refers Liven to the peti A person fror account of the r rics and the We `Sober last. :Mr. A .000 upon trxribequel 'hos,t.—Ordered Mr. WARD timatea in the C Sir CRAR LI -Rood for to-inm Mr. PARNE wetting the assi nd. . . Lord Cife IT& fdrititire number the I felt it unnece Fie should 11 object of his litamen renc bill of last se militia to vo ready so strait ...proposed Was aqua' to one namely, 21,0 erayly clay, tc Artansisitor OF TIMM. - - Mr. WHITBREAD rose to correct a mistatement made as he understood in some of the public prints, of a passage in his speech on a former night, respect ing the evidence before the House, in the case of the .Duke of York, and in which he was represented to have said that a letter was addressed to Mrs. Clarke by the Archbishop of TIIAM, which representation, he understood, had considerably hurt the feelings of the Rev. Prelate's Riends ; he however, to elieve them from any anxiety od that account, so far as he was concerned, by declaring that, he 'cierrain)y had never made use of any suth ettstesshin. What he had said was only that in which he was borne:' out by the evidence ; namely, that a - letter written by the Archbishop of 'l'uam, respecting Dr. O'Meara,-iPas found in the possession of Mrs. Clarke, bat it Was addressed to Ijr. O'Meara bienself. He did notmean to make any complaint against the printer for this inaccuracy, which might have easily occurred without the slightest intention : he was only sot-prized at the accuracy with which the Reports of the proceeangs uf the House were. generally given. Sir G. F. HILL said something, which we under stood to be in acknowledgment of . the explanation jiven by the Honourable Member. CALL OP THE HM IS& Lord FOIXSTONE stow moved, list the Order of the Day • be read, for tailing Over the Ho use : *hick baifig toad atcordiugy; he proposed to adjou rn it to a date hour of the evening, as he understood the liouse-ivas likely to come to state dethiort this night upon the preliminary question; and he should 'than b e able to judge, how far it wouldlus. adithetthle to ad - the &Ake tOilt1401 , 1•16or stlitore'distatatAty. After a few words from General GAKOIGrit, the Order of the Day was then read, for returning the adjourned debate, upon the evidenett the conduct of the Commander in Chie' . ..' l' Lord MILTON rosetdsd laid, that u kids nib rtieutou s subject he felt it his 'ditty 'to fotirsl.ofieiou upon a m A ture . consideration of 'die evidenak teitAbiu attending to the chunehrs Without the House; or lie misrepresentations on the other side of it. He had not formed his opinion frcon thecloetrines of Meroheis of legal habits who had spoken on this subject, : still less from the doctrine of the Learned Judge (Mr. Barton), who spolre on the first night of the debate ; a doctrine which bore oh its face the absurdity, that because a witness had in some instances contradicted. herself, therefore her whole evidence should be swept . away. If' this principle were acted tip to, the testi mcny of almost every witness who had been brought to their Bar would Le impeachable. In examining evidence of the nature ef that before the House, it was necessary tb attend:tO slight circumstances which often confirmed the testimony , of a witness ovenmore than an a pparent veracity throughout. From the evi dence before the House, k thugt cotheto a resolution that the present Commander in Chief cannot with j safety retain his situation. It was difficult to say, whe- ; therhe was guilty of personal cortuption, although those' Who entirely believed the evidence on the table, I ' llinst come even to thaeconclusion. The Noble Lord jt 11:Llton) however, did not carry his admiration of 'Mrs. Clarke's testimony quite so far as the Noble Lord (Folkstone) did ' • and he should not say, that every part of it was to be believed ; for though there were minute circumstances which tended to confirm its general truth, yet there was an air of flippancy about her manner of speaking, which might well lay her open to suspicion. Upon this account, he should leave out of consideration all those parts of her evi dence, relating to transactions with the Duke of York, ' which had not been otherwise proved ; but there were • Vo many And such various circumstances corroborated , by uniMpeachable witnesses and undeniable docu ments, that if he did not entirely believe the evidence , in question, he believed a great deal more of it than ! many persons who had spoken on Allis subject. The NOble Lord mentioned one instance.in particular, in I which the evidence of Mrs. Clarke was not only con firmed by Mr. Dowler, butby a Right Hon. Member, of that House (Mr..Lostg), He had heard of a nev i turnal conspiracy ; would the authors of this charge • go so far as to say that. that Right Hon. Gentleman: ' was one"of the conspirators As to the charge of cor-t ruption in the CoMmander in Chid; the only case in! which there was direct proof cif 'this, was that of Kennet. This was the strongest case t here was a il !.man of infamops clerracter,.a.bankrupt, proposing e. p to, • the of York, through the medium of Colone l i tayter, a loan to any extent, in iheevent of his gain..; hlg i place by that means. The 'Noble :tent con-: trasted the conduct of the Duite of Toik on diis oe.• casion 'with that of the.Dtrlie of Portland,olvititecent, occasion. The one resents the . infamous•condustt"oC 1 the applicant . (Beasley), spurns thewretch who could' I think so mean y of him from his doe*, and gives op! his name to the 'Mutts •of Londonii Diocesan. I The othercerers To Mr. Oreematxrd and others, and suffers a negociation, -which the Noble Lord could call by no milder name than bribery, to .go on from i June till November. If this was not a direct proof of a corrupt mind in his Royal Highness, the Noble . Lord knew not what further proof could be acqUired. But it might be said:this-case did not come within the order to the Committee ; and cert a i n ly up on t hi s !ground, it might -be contended that no corruption in ' the Commander in Chief had been .proved. But in several cases, which are cognizable by the Committee, in the cases of French and Sanden, the Noble Lord I thought himself entitled to carry along with him this evidence of a eorrupt hind. There was no reasona i 1 ble doubt, from the continuance of the levy of Colo nel French, who appeared in no better light than that of a crimp for the army, beyond the time stipulated in• his letter of service, and from ot:,er circumstances,, • that the levy was obtained through the influence o( IMrs. Clarke; but having no direct proof of corrup ; tion in this case, the Noble Lord was obliged to make I use of the case of Kennet, to prove that the Duke of • York knew too well what corruption was going for ward. The Noble Lord then said a few words op the second Address which had been proposed (that of ' Mr. Basoces), and which he thought in substance the same as the first, although the second had his Lord, ship's preference, as it appeared to him to be worded 1 in a less offensive manner than the first, and because the first contained some expressions to which he de cidedly objected. 4g Without an)ssother than the oh ! viotis consequence, that if ev,:r the opinion should pre ! %rail in the army, that promotion was to be obtained 1 in any other way except by merit and services, such an opinion.must tend materially to wound the feelings and abate the zeal of the army, and to do it essential injury." These were expressions that were particu , laxly dangerous, inasmuch as they tended to convert ltheanny into a deliberative body. The. Noble Lord regretted, that the House had not come into the pro pssition. that the present Inquiry shonhl have been L . made by a Parliamentary Cosnrnissioe. Tit;. House would 'not then - have heard.of the ~ injustice of eon , slemniag without trial," nor •would these public ex. i aminations have goneabroad, to the scandal of all the lworld • the evidence would then have been up on oa th, .land. the House would not have been in the situation of Inot knowing . what to . believe and what not to believe. !Ilbt -approiong very much of either of the Addresses Iwhich had been proposed, the' Noble Lord did not intend to buithen the House with any new motion, hat shoal& content 'himself with expressing his own, ivpiniba, t hat ,~ either the Address nor Resolution should be mask but that the whole evidence. should simply-be laid male, the King. At the same time 1 the Noble Lord had no difficulty in expressing 'that which he felt upon hii mind, namely, that the Corn ! mander in Chief must have had suspicions of the transactions which had Come out. The objection to ! this measure of the Noble Lord's would be, that it cast the whole responsibility upon the King. But if the House addressed the King, it would be the same, I for the Duke's dismissal- must go through the King. The Noble Lord's plan, he thought, the. more deli-. rate one; but as he could not flatter himself that he should find many to agree with him, ho should eh- Main from putting it in any shape to the House. In ' the 'consideration of the present question, the Noble Lord hoped the House would not be deterred eithei by threats from without doors, to Make them :O. nallit s . or by threats from villain, to make. the.46l little; bet it was Weettery to the well-beietg of the r Justice Blackstone, *b.heifeelbat country, that some steps should b© taken, if the his assertion. In the Roman Senat e Honitan, had formed that convection, to which alone even required from Cato, whew probitt dier tikikst have come, if neither fear nor favour, nor i bial. By voting the Address proposed; aite iitertideration that he whom they judged was a the Duke of York Would b e d e g ra d e d , • Ttliee, and a son of the King , bad inuenced them. ; of that which every British subject had The. Noble Lord .had teat objections generally to :nand, An impartial and solemd hem e Royal Familylrbolding takes of trust. To not denied to Lord Somers or Lord touch what was so near the Throne looked like a hind why should it be re! used to his .Ikoyal. of sacrilege. The Hee& must not, Itowearr, =that The my lamp-lighter who attended die' account, account, be deterred from doing their duty. They . not be refused it. , surely, the dignity of must consider themselves .as 410 t .bait 20 address the not be held eut as an argument for refute r , Throne for the-removal from office of the Duke of , privileges of the most humble. The lei York, but of fire Commander in Chief. In this the Duke of York, only demandiiag this 'light only was he to be considered ; if he were the immutable and eternal grounds of looked upon in any other, judgment nurst be warped. be considered -as equitalele .aaad praise The Noble Lord could not agree whiz' a doctolue An of the Hon.Certtreenan, which had been laid down, that Another Cowman- privilege, was only a gilded 'd:e4ger, der in Chief as excellent as the Duke of York could could not conceal ot counteract its venom, not be found. There was undoubtedly considerable do by insinuation that wlaieh it 'would be advantage to be derived from the Commander in noble to do by open means. Here he e, Chief's being one .of the Royal Family ; but upon the jellying a compliment - to the eloqueace Whole, there were so many inconveniences arising Lord '(Lord Folkestone), who . had In from that circumstance, that 'he thought them much him over the plains of Hindustan, ;More than a counterbalance to that advantege.— was surprised how he could possibly. Theexcellence of the Duke's generalship was nothing original Address.—He here &Lay a di to the present _question—he might be'a.Duke of Mari- tween .neglect and 'corruption. Neglect borough-.but it would be recollected, that the Duke • taken . placa, and it w a s mot to be wood, of'Martborough himself wat removed from the corn- i extensive aft establishment as the milital maaid of the orany e and there was no man who would country—and, he thought, it might h e not agree - that the Duke of Marlborough was a much 1 some pardon. It would Ise but fair to tel greater General than the Duke of York was, •or was "at once, whether the Duke was guilty ever likely 'to become. It had been said that the or guilty of neglect, ot whether the desi Duke would reform—the Noble Lord begged the him gat of office. (Hear, hear.) As to House to recollect that the Duke was a man of Elec. of Mrs. clarke, he considered her but as and-forty ; and though the Noble Lord believed, that bish--she should be put comeletely ow where a man possessed the rudiments of wisdom, they Should have something more soli( he would grow wiser as he grew older, he thought build a superstructure. Here the Hon that where a man . pussessed only. the rudiments of net went through the different canes, an, folly, he would do nothing but grow more foolish. cularly on that of Colonel French's lev The Duke •of York had acted foolishly and wrongly,! versation reported by Miss Taylor to ha , he had, though a married man, kept one, two, three,; in her presence between *Mrs. Clarke any !end the Noble Lord did not ',know how many more, York, he could not help considering r. mistresses • and now he was to reform all of a sudden, reflected On the long time for whi c h t h e because the Right Hon. Gentleman told hint he had. rated the levy—a levy, too, for which s sinned against the 7th commandment. The Noble' -men had been raised, when compared wi Lord hoped the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Cap- ber stipulated by the original contract:: ning) would now tell the House .where infamy was considered the general stigma which ha) to fall— if upon the accused, he did not know how unfairly cast on the legal profession, mus the House would determine—if upon the accuser, he. say, what he Was sure all the Crown La, thought no other person would agree with the Right with equal justice say, that Cicero had 'Non. Gent leman. The Noble Lord concluded with trial of Verres, that he would much , animadve rting upon the Duke of York's letter, to the than. accuse. He was consoled when he House, which, had certainly placed them in an awk- this case, by the consideration of the ward predicament. He was accused, and told the. which it had been t reate d ; by th e cons , 'House he was innocent, 4 , upon the honour of a all parties and persons in the House had , Prince," an .effixession never heard of before. By fairly, and impartially had given th e op, this fo olish letter, he had only brought down a second went to direct their votes ; for his part, nescpsation Upon hishead - that of falsehood too. The stituents the eyes of Argus, he would ,Noble Lord knew not by what logic it could be rented to his political career. In tonal uvuld say, that becauseheco notuld.tw its think of vi juke's guilt or corrupti o n , m ust I‘ m 'e ust co n n oW inc in e e d v o it i a . b tie originall l y tut him guilty of two things—corruption and false- nor would he vote for the Amendment 'hood. Gentleman on the floor, (Mr. Bankei Lord STANLEY said, the House in its conside- merely dealt in insinuation ; he would ' ration of the present question, were not bound by the Duke of York with a knowledge of legal opinions, nor by the rules Illegal evidence ; but proceedings ; and, whea the Rigfit Ho) had .a rational right to give the conviction of their opposite ( the Chancellor of the Exchequ: minds. The Noble Lord hoptal he came to this ques- Resolution tending to ulterior proceedin! tion with a mind as free from bias as that of the certainly move the following Arnendme; Learned Judge (Mr. Burton), or of any Member in e Resolved, that this House do believe his Rol the House. If his Lordship's mind had any bias, it Con:lama.. in Chief.to h ave h a d a k now l ? d ge . was, from the 'many personal obligations he had re- practices, of which evidenc e h a d 1 7 en p ro d uce d ceived from his Royal Highness, rather in his favour Mr. RYDER said, if he was.to •vot hDukee woul d u ofl d York's the course conduct as proposedtuo nal than against him. But yet sifted as the evidence before consider C him had been, and in his Lordship's opinion rather Baronet who bad just sat down, as more too finely, he felt it impossible to say the Duke of adopted Hon Gentleman opposite, because it by the House than the Amen, York was innocent. Upon the charge of personal . corruption,_ and the evidence of Mrs. Clarke. the manly, honourable, ard open. With Noble Lord agreed with the last speaker. But the • scantucloadverted-to testimony of ;Mrs. evidence of Miss Tayler the Noble Lord defended, . would not content himself lay saying ht was not to be believed, but he would and thought very strong. From the numerous ap• felt Son ; th ought she would have been ceanmiti plications of Mrs. Clarke, the 'Noble Lord vinced, suspicions must have struck the Duke cis York's mind ; and if the House had not heard a tittle by any judge in the land , and subjecto ties of pe rjury evidence. He for her led to think much more favourably of Mi of evidence at their bar, still his Lordship should think that the letters on the table alone would prove the improbabilities against her were so • never could imwrine her entitled to th e his Royal Highness's connivance at corruption. If there was a natairal ground for this suspicion, the di t. t. What I was it to be believed foi Duke should be dismissed. In a former reign, the even if the Duke of York had b Duke of Cumberland had _not only been deprived cf th at, such corrupt prat de as had been attend all offices, but dismissed his Majesty's Councils and he , would have made Miss Taylor ptivy near, hear.):—Ntas it to be credited, that presence for ever, in consequence of the capitulation of Closterseven. The Noble Lord applied to the dit versation ev ery did take place before her, was, that it would . be the only one ficulty of making out charges against a Prince in the high situation of the Duke of York, the speech of wonld have been witness ? Was it ti either that this conversation could havi Angelo to Isabel, in Shakespearel Measure for Measure : a minute impression upon her innocent cious mind, that at the distance of tot could repeat it word for word—(J/ear, person living could for one moment give high 4 improbable a story. But, as a of her direct falsehood, he would mere) answer which she had given, and then b debility to the judgment of the House. ' ed, whether, at the time of conversatit h. d with Mrs. Clarke only two days bet sent inquiry, she had made any reierenr pected inquiry. What was her allSrfl indeed, I did not know about that.' senses would believe her after this ? said, that one who tells fal.sehoed ono therefore to he discredited, as he neigh speak truth, and that truth might preys But how was it possible to know when son spoke truth and when falsehood ? ( Suppo e, however, the Duke of Yerk instead of honourable in his conduct—sr always herded with the vilest, instead with the hest of mankind - kept compat tain Sanden, instead of such men a; don—what.would be the immediate at inference ? Why, certainly guilt-. Then, revolutionary logic should not the very sequence follow, a hen the very reverse been proved—(Hear, hear.) - After alh t which had been used—after ail the reven) of Mrs. Clarke, nothing could be prove." except indiscretion. Out of all the c( of Mrs. Clarke with the Duke, the tilt; tern which she h:td stated she had in hi tmly.two could he at last produced to shadow of imputltion against him. Li then notvote-for an Address condemni Meta on. proof it- found .him • -; •r . ' Who will believe thee, Isabel? My vouch against you, and my place i! the state, Will so your accusation overwcigh, . That you shall stifle in vitt, own report, • And smell of calumny." The Noble Lord then cursorily went over the cases of Kennet, Carter, General Claver;ng s and Mr. Dow ler, to prove the influence of Mrs. Clarke, and the gross and culpable negligence and connivance at cor ruption of the Duke of York, and conducted by sup porting the original Address. Mr. LEYCkBTE 2 was desirous that the question nn.which the House should divide should he plain and intelligible,- to that when they came to vote, the sentiments* of individuals might be apparent. The Honourable and Learned Member first commented on the inconsistency of the Honourable Gentleman's (Mr. Bankes's) Amendment, which first acquitted the Duke of York of personal corruption, and then suspected him of it. If the Duke was guilty, let the Hon. Gentleman say so, and the Duke would have an opportunity of clearing himself. But was there any justice in this method of implication ? The Ho . nourablq - and Learned Member then proceeded to conuneitt at large upon the evidence, and said that thotestimony of Mrs. Clarke would justify her trial fur perjury, and would ensure her the pillory in any Cotirrof . Jistice. The Honourable Gentleman con chided by ithtergius, that there was no charge of con nivance occoirupuon made out against the Duke of York. • * • Sir THOMAS TURTON began by assuring the Mime that after all that had been said upon this sub ject, he would as briefly as possible trespass on their patience. He adverted to the absolute impropriety of passing sentence up on any man in the land, no • Matter.what his rant,. at least .without. the formality of an oath. :rigs, he tairloaas thecopinion 91 Mr. etd lse*:7 , 444.l a llll : ll l :l°3 d 4Pt e tPPl nhi p r fc (le..34:: ; Eitti4R . • • right to d,. mei I:addci t turd :y Af rant aoni.l t t n ir e i bl r e i i ; ,u li r, whose br„utY . ' well; r , l l lLe l ths4 to e . It Id be much le could not ace of the N„1,,, ;e an, but still h e ibly support t h, a dist inction be. elect mit;ht h ave ondered at in y n litary one of thi s t be deseivinp o bell the country lty of corrup:io e , desire v as to let cs to the evidt tat it as an tnuc:i rub. out of the war ; solid whereir, to lonourable Lure. and dwelt purti. levy. The Qn. have taken - ph:re .and the Duke ei g true, v.hea le. the Duke tole.. rch so very few with the nun:- :r.• He, when he t had been :nest must beg leave to &Lawyers rniph: t had said on the :h rather defend at he reflected ut the fairness with :onsideration tht had come forwat.! e opinions which )art, had his m- ild wish them di- , nclusion, he nwe of voting for the of determinative, rent of the Hoe. inlres) because it ild charge Of those corrt::,t I-lon. Gentlentaa equer) moved his edings, he sltoul drnent : is Royal Highness ate 'dge of ttoie cumpt iced at the Bar." vote against tIT Inlander in Chia:, )sed by the H. fore eligible to he neadment cf it was the mol :ith respect to the Mrs. Clarke, g he thought , h! ouki also say Ls rmiued to prim .cted to the per,:,:- He could not be of Miss Tavlor— • so great, that the slightest cr.:- I for a moment, td been guilty et atribumi to hint, ivy to it —(floir, that, if this col- her, Sel jUIIS ne to which she t to be credited have made such :cnt and unsuspi- ' four years sh.: FIB ar, hear.)--N 4 : give credit to s• 1 is a further proof merely state One en leave her ere- se. She was ask- 'sad( n which she rs berme the pre- Tence to thy er- tswer ? " Whv, t." . Who' in hi: s? It had been once ought not night atiettwar44 ?rove important. 'hen such a per. • ? ( licar,ketzt-) rlc I:td been bast —suppose he ad of associating npany with Cig- as Colonel e and necess 3 :l 'hen, by whetvile Try - reverse co.!. erne conduct hal all the industry revengeful mOke roved againglir 9 e correspondence fifty or sbtty let• her,posessielv to show. even Let the Ho se •rrtnitcg him vie g t ai t y..kt it-