Star. — London, England, 1809-05-05 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. ADMIRALTY COURT, DOCTORS' COMMONS, Ma• 2. This day the Right Hon. Sir W. Scorr proceeded to the adjudication of the following cases : THE XING v. WAYTJI. This was a suit instituted in the instance Court, on the part of the Crown, by the tlreetsrator-General, against Wayth, late Muter of a Merchant ship, the Cynthia, for disobedience of orders of the conveying ships, the Harpy and Pilchard, on a voy age from Nevrfooodland to England, and also for insolent lan guage. The charges being clearly proved, the Court fined tho p arty 501. with full costs. Bolata,Trtunfry master—This was a question of freight, whe ther it was due to the Crown or the captors? The Court decreed the same to be due to the captors. Two Marias, master—This was an American vessel, laden with coffee and sugar, bound from Boston to Holland; and the case cane on on further proof. The Court restored the ship, and that part of the cargo consisting of sugar and green coffee ; and di rected still further proof as to the other part, called Batavian coffee. COURT CiF_CHANCERY, MAY 1. TESTAMENTARY CONTRACTS. COLONEL HARWOOD V. JOHN DORNE TOOKE, ESQ. AND SIR FRANCIS MIRDETT. The Loan CimscELtiortbis day gave judgment in this important cause, with a reservation of an oppor tunity on a future day of assigning the grounds and reasons of such judgment more fully, or of varying , his decree, if he could find any grounds for so doing. After some preliminary .observations, his Lordship said, that as a gift thS note would be legal and good; or, as an agreement respecting the expected fortune of the deceased, this Court had not sufficient grotinds to rescind the contract ; nor did the name of Bir Francis Burdett, as the intended grantor of certain annuities for the £4OOO, make any difference in the case, for Sir Francis Burdett had rot acted or paid any thing upon the contract. Mischievous as, such contracts might be in the way of precedent, his Lordship found nothing in the Plaintiff's bill or evidence to sustain the relief he now prayed for, nor did he see that the Plaintiff had a leg to stand do in this case.—Judgment for the Defendants. MAY 4. AYIMARKET ?HEAT RE.•• -MORRIS V. COLMAN. Sir S. ROMILLY stated, that this case had been al ready before his Lordship, who had directed it to stand over, with a recommendation to the parties to anoint arbitrators. It related to an alledged advan tage given by Mr. Colman, the Manager, to Mr. Hams, of Covent-garden Theatre, at the expence of the Hay-market concern ; in consequence of which, the other partners applied to the Lord Chancellor to have him removed from the management. Sir S. ROMILLY said, that in consequence of his Lordship's vcommendation, his client, Mr. Morris, had ap pointed Mr. Ca' •auford, a Gentleman at the Bar, as his Arbitrator. Mr. Colman, on his part, had ap pointed Mr. Harris, of Covent-garden Theatre, to whom Mr. Morris objected, on the ground that he could not, from the circumstance of the case, be perfectly impartial. Sir S. ROMILLY allowed that no man could be selected more proper to decide tipon such a business than Mr. Harris, were it not that part of the Plaintiff's f.omplaint was the improper prefer ence shewn to Mr. Harris by Mr. Colman. As the parties could not agree, he was under the necessity of calling for his Lordship's opinion Ind order. Mr. Haar, on the part of Mr. Colman, contended that it was impossible a more eligible arbitrator could have been found than Mr. Harris. The advantage derived by Mr. Harris from the alledged preference was so trifling, as not to be worth mentioning, and certainly could never in the least operate on the mind of Mr. Harris so as to prevent his acting in the ca pacity of arbitrator with the utmost impartiality. The LORD CHANCELLOR had no doubt that Mr. Harris, if accepted by the other side, would do jus tice ; but at the same time, as he was connected with the ground of complaint, the objection on the part of Mr. Morris could not be considered as altogether un reasonable. If they could not agree before Monday, he would then give them his opinion. Mr. HART, after the remark made by his Lord ship, agreed, on the part of his client, to appoint another arbitrator ; but stated his apprehension that if Mr. Taylor should be appointed, the other side would still find out some cause of objection. II AMNtERSLEY AND OTHERS V. SHERIDAN. Mr. Rir:i.►nns applied to the Chancellor, on the part of the Plaintiffs, to have a receiver appointed under the following circumstances. They had lent 60001. and other sums to the Defendant, who mort gaged for the payment the produce of 40,0001. 3 per Cents. in which he had a life interest. The principal, after his death, was to go to Mrs. Sheridan and her children, and was vested in trustees for that purpose. The Plaintiffs prayed for the appointment of a re ceiver of this produce, in order to render their secu rity available. Mr. ALEXANDER, on the part of the trustees, Lord Grey and Mr. Whitbread, had nothing to say to this application, further than to take care that none of the objects of their trust should be defeated. Order for the Plaintiffs. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MAY 1. tHE KING V. MORGAN. The defendant was brought up to receive judg ment for giving a challenge to a gentleman of the name of Laney, in Hampshire. It appeared that some reports of a disagreeable nature prevailed against a friend of the defendant, and Mr. Laney, who was a leading man in a club to which that gentleman be longed, procured the members to disband themselves, and re-unite, omitting him from the number of their members. The defendant called on the prosecutor, and behaved rudely in his house, demanding to know the name of the person from whom he received his information, and, not btaining a satisfactory reply, threatened him with a caning. The Court sentented him to three months impri sonment, and to find surety for his good behaviour for three years. TUE RING V. BELL. The defendant was a land surveyor, and had been employed by a Mr. Fitzgerald, a gentleman of for tune, in Hampshire, to survey some estates, his bill for which amounted to £1669. Mr. Fitzgerald not being so ready to pay this bill as the defendant wished him to be, the defendant sent him a challenge, for which Mr. Fitzgerald prosecuted him by information in the Crown Office. He was convicted, and then sent b I his attorney an offer to refer all matters in difference to arbitration, lumpliag the challenge in as an item of the accotigt. mitt tie * ptinishintni. _ Mr. Serjeant PELL, Mr. GAM addressed the Court in mitigation of .at. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said he did not mean to find fault with the observations of the Counsel for the de fendant, which were very appropriate and judicious, but perhaps it might have occurred to some men as the only extenuation of the defendant's fault, that instead of having a tendency to break the peace s it must have a tendency to preserve the peace in future, by rendering duelling perfectly ridiculous, when a surveyor challenges a gentleman because he will not pay an extravagant bill. The Court sentenced the defendant to six months imprisonment, and to find sureties for his good beha viour for three years. MAY S.-CRIMINAL INFORMATION. Mr. GARROW moved for a Rule to shew cause, why a criminal information should not be filed against Mr. Joseph Lyme, for a libel upon W. Byrne, Esq. a Commissioner and Agent for protecting Portu guese property in this country. The libel was con tained m two letters, addressed by Mr. Lyme to his correspondents in Portugal and the Brazils, dated the 27th of April, and the 24th of June, 1808 ; wherein he described the prosecutor and his coadjutors as such gluttons, that they would eat up all the pro perty ; and suggested that they were guilty of a most shameful and injurious delay in their proceed ings, and that their waste and destruction of the pro perty was such as to excite horror. Lord ELLEwnitatoucti said, that no particular act of delinquency was ascribed to the prosecutor. The calumny, he doubted not, was as unfounded as it was gross ; but it pointed at no speciEc act. The letters, too, appeared to have been confidentially written. Mr. GARROW said, the calumny was destructive of the reputation of the Comilissioners, and was calcu lated to destroy all confidence in the Portuguese na tion. The letters, he added, were circular, and sent to the correspondents of Mr. Byrne. Lord EL LENBOROC GU replied, that considering the situation of the Commissioners, it was important that they should be esteemed clear and just in the office entrusted to them ; and upon that ground it might be fit that the accused party should be called upon to explain himself.—Rule to shew cause granted. TILE KING V. JOSEPH HAI4SON, The defendant was this day brought up to. receive the judgment of the Court. He was convicted at the last Assizes for Lancashire, for encouraging a large body of discontented weavers, at Manchester, to riot and confusion, and a breach of the peace. It appeared in evidence, at the trial, that he rode up to the mob, and ezclaimed--" My lads, your cause is a good one, and you will succeed. I will support you as far as 30001. will go ; and if that is not enough, I will go farther. Nodin and his faction shall not drive you from the field this day. lam sorry your bill in Parliament is lost, but I am still the weaver's friend." Mr. RAINE addressed the Court, in mitigation ' and insisted that the defendant wished to pacify the weavers discontents, and not exasperate them. The ATTOTiNEY GENERAL insisted upon the reverse of that proposition ; and the Court, after hearing the affidavits and arguments on both sides, ordered the defendant to be brought up for final judgment on Friday se'nnight ; and, in the mean time, stand com mitted to the King's Bepch prison. THE RING V. JOHN MARTIN. The defendant, who was convicted at the last Maid stone Assizes of a libel upon Richard Best, Esq. the Treasurer of the parish of Greenwich, by circulating a hand bill, on the eve of a parish election, inferring that Mr. Best had kept large balances of the parish money in his possession ; and that he had debited the parish with the payment of an annuity of 161. to one Jane Robson, three years after her death, was this day brought up to receive judgment. The defendant put in an affidavit, asserting the truth of what he had stated, and that he was ready to prove it before the Master, if the Court would order the parish books to his o ffi ce. HQ denied any malice, and said his only motive was to correct abuses. This was answered by an affidavit from the prose cutor, who alledged the accusation to be false and scandalous, and courted the enquiry asked for. Mr. Serjeant &sr admitted, that the truth of the! publication did not in law render it less ,a libel, but it would operate in mitigation of punishment. The defendant's affidavit was an excuse, but not a justifi cation. He admitted the impropriety of the defen dant's putting the libellous hand bill in his window, but he was not the first man who had published an electioneering squib. • Mr. BOLLAND followed on the same side, and ob served, that the defenclint, thinking the prosecutor was implicated in some parish abuses, thought it his duty to inform his fellow parishioners of the fact, by pub lishing it in a hand bill, on the day of his proposed re-election. Mr. GA RROW, in support of the prosecution, spoke with much severity at the defendant, who, he said, had every thing to learn from the Court. His per suasion was, that a popular election was a fair season for attacking a candidate at all points ; and that he had a right to let off as many electioneering squibs as he thought proper. He would, however, find him self mistaken on that head. The temper, ton, in which he came to the Court was worthy notice, and he had thought proper to assert the truth of that libel of which he had been found guilty. He had also insulted one of the witnesses fer the prosecution, after the trial, by telling him that he would still find there was " something rotten in the state of . Den. mark ;" and that lie would overhaul the parish books in the Master's office. The prosecutor, Mr. Garrow added, had been scrupulously just in his office, and the defendant had not the least pretence for libelling him. His motives, therefore, must be malignant. Mr. MARRYATT and Mr. GURNEY addressed the Court on the same side ; when Lord ELLENBOROUGH, after observing that he could find no excuse, in law, for electioneering squibs, if they were libellous, di rected the defendant to be brought up again on Sa turday, and, in the mean time, that he stand com mitted to the King's Bench Prison. THE KING V. ALEXANDER STUART, ESQ. This defendant was also found guilty of publishing one of the hand-bills last alluded to ; but as he cir culated the same merely as a paper of curiosity in the election, he was fined JES and discharged. THE KING V. JOHN ALDBERRY. ......... John Aldberry, rope-maker, convicted of having naval-stores in his possession which he knew belonged to the Crown, was sentenced to six months imprison ment in Muisistone gaol, to be curd Is. and to *r. teiatie isod 'l'o6nd in his Poitesilo i n. Mr. Justic g $ GROSE stated, tnat a much severer sentence woul have been passed on him, had'UOt two affidavits bee read In mitigation. MAY 4. JUDGMENTS. J. White, convicted of selling obscene books and prints, was sentenced to 'stand in the pillory, at Char ing -Cross, and to be imprisoned and kept to hard la bour for two years in the Houae of Correction for the County of Middlesex. Robert Jacques, formerly an attorney in London, who fifteen years ago was convicted of perjury, but wlio escaped from sentence by having gone to Ame rica, was brought up to receive the judgment of the Court. Mr. COMMON SERJEANT took an objection to the indictment, that it no where stated or alledged that he had falsely sworn in a matter material to the issue in inquiry.—Rule granted to shew cause. THE KING V. POTTER. The Defendant Was brought up to receive the sen tence of the Court, for having endeavoured to procure the escape of a French prisoner of war, upon his pa role in Devonshire. The defendant was an old smug gler, and meeting the prisoner, a Colonel in the French army, persuaded him to quit the town, to the limits of which he was confined, and go with him to Bere, upon the sea coast. The defend ant - first asked thirty guineas, and received twelve guineas. He kept the Frenchman for two or three days secreted at several farm-houses, and then having got all his money of him, wanted to induce him to go back to the place where be had escaped from. Mr. Justice GROSZ, in passing sentence, made very strong remarks on the baseness of his conduct, both with respect to his country, and to a distressed fo reigner, confined in this country, whom he first tempted to break his word, pledged to the country, and then pillaged of his little property.—He was sentenced to be imprisoned for two years in Exeter Gaol. THE KING V. RICH. The defendant, who kept a book-stall under a pub lic•house window in Oxford -street, was brought up to receive sentence, for exposin to sale filthy and ob scene books and prints. The defendant was prose cuted lay the Society for the Suppression. of Vice, and the books and Kints were purchased on three succes sive days, by their Clerk. The defendant put in a long affidavit, full of fine phrases, about the justice, the mercy, and the clemency of the Court, and the general humanity of this highly-favoured nation. He expressed the deepest and most sincere contrition for his offence, and suggested that he was betrayed into it by the informer; who took advantage of his frailty and his necessities. Mr. GARROW, on behalf of the Society, expressed great indignation at the canting hypocrisy and the infamous falsehood of this affidavit.' He said, he little expected that these foul insinuations against the So- ciety, which, he thought, were confined only to news papers, would ever disgt4ce the records of the Court. It afforded him, however, an opportunity of rescuing the Society from these impusations ; and he would publicly declare, that, though he knew nothing of their general _conduct, which might he very indiscreet and very foolish, yet, on this bead, he would say, practically, they had done great good. These things had formerly been hawked about at schools, but books and print.; of this horrible description were, he ' believed,.now very difficult to be had. The defendant was sentenced to he confined in the House of Correction for Middlesex, and there kept to hard labour for two years, -and to stand once in the pillory for one hour at Charing-Cross. BOYDELL V. DRESINION D. The Court heard a further argument in this case, which was tried at the Sittings after last Term at Guildhall. It was an action against Mr. Drummond, the banker, for not receiving the remainder of the copies of the Shakespear Gallery, subscribed for by him, by which many broken sets were left on Mr. Boydell's hand.—The Court decided that the action would not lie, the contract not being in writing ; in asmuch as it was a contract not to be performed with in a year, and all such contracts by the statute were to be in writing. EXECUTlON.—Wednesday morning, ateight o'clock, William Cool was executed near the Debtor's Door, at Newgate, pursuant to his sentence, for breaking into a stable in Chapel Mews, Mary-la-bonne, on the 12th of January last, with intent to steal a great coat, value 51. the property of James Paterson, and felo niously firing, or attempting to fire, at Thomas Hem mings, Anthony Gower, and William Gower, in their endeavour to apprehend him. To the two las points he pleaded Guilty. As a great number of persr ns are rendered very unhappy by Spasms, Wind in the Stomach, Obstructions in the Bowels, want of regular Perspiration, Vomiting', and Bilious Complaints, Head-Ache, Heart-Burn, Costiveness, Nervous Disorders, Cho lic, Gout, &c. We are authorised to s:,y, that SPFEDIMAN'S Pills are in most cases an excellent remedy for the* complaints ; and especially recommended during the time of Sea Bathing, and drinking the Sea and Mineral Waters; also fur those visiting warns Climates.—Prepared by Thomas SHILLITOE, jun. Drug gist, 'J'ottenhasn Higb Cross, Middlesex, by virtueof an assign ment from H. and J. lirsvetcx, sole Proprietors orthe Receipt, by the Will of Mr. SPtEDIMAN ; and are sold by Shaw and Ed wards, No. 66, Sc. Paul's Church-yard; and Bacon and Co. No. 150; Oxford -street, in Boxes at 2s. 43. 6d. 10s. 6d. and One Guinea ; and may be had of the Principal Venders of Medicines in Town and Country. BIRTH. At Boston, Lincolnshire, on Sunday last, the Lady of Captain Dobson, of a son. FOR DISORDERS OF THE HEAD, DIMNESS OF SIGHT, DEFECT OF :MARINO, &c. THB CORDIAL CEPHALIC SNUFF. S a Proof of its efficacy, Mr. RI CHA R D T HORN , A •of ItehennStoke, Hants, writes le February, 1803, to the Proprietors as follows : " I am now 74 years old, and can see to read with common glasses, and my memory is as good as when I was onlylB. In July, 1776 (29 years ago) I was seized with a dreadful giddiness in my bead. My doctor gave me various medicines : they did me no good. He admitted this, and candidly advised the use of your Cephalic Snuff. I took it, and in a few weeks was much better. After this I took it more freely, and in six weeks was'as well and hearty as ever, and so have continued to this day." In consequence of the increased expence of the ingredients of which this elegant and efficacious Snuff is composed, and the high duty upon the bottles, the Proprietors are under the necessity of raising the price to Is. lid. per bottle, stamp included. It is sold only by F: Newbery and Sons, at the Warehouse for Dr. James's Powder, No. 48, in St. Paul's Church-yard, London ; and Brodie and Co. at Salisbury ; and none is genuine, unless the words " P. Newbery, No. Ar k St; Paul's," be engraved on the Stamp; and, by their appointdient, by Ward, Holborn; Sanger and Alien, Oxford-street ; Wade, Bond-street ; Hayward, Pic cadilly; Bayley and Blew, Cockspnr-street ; Harris, corner of LudP.te - street ; Randall, Royal Exchange; and Clarke and Roiling and Co. Borough. SALES 1W AUCTION. • LANGLEY BURY, WATS, BETWEENWXTFORD ArD BERKFIAMP:STF.AD..— Live and Dead Farming Stock, a Gig and Harness, a pair of fir Bay Coach Horses and Harness, a thororgS bred broixi got by Holyhock, Dam (Polyan-hus Davit) by Sweet W out of Marianne, a capital Hunter, a Bay Gelding, a Ma foal, and a Brown Galloway, tour Cart Horses and Hal , three Milch Cows, five Cows in Calf, foul. Heifers. I. Calves, two Bulls, Leicester and Ryland Sheeler, Pou y, and various Effects.—By Mr. ROBINS, On the Premises, on Saturday, May 13, at Eleven o'Clock, THE Live and Dead FARMING STOCK, rick: of Hay and Barley, Carts, Northumbeihnd Ploughs, Bar. rows, Drilling Machine and Chaff-cutting ditto, a Market C.rt, and Water ditto, numerous Farming Implements, eigkt dozei of Ash Hurdles, a large Drag Net, and various other e-11,c:s, the property of a Nobleman, at his Mansion, Langley Bury, nsar Watford, Herts. _ _ May be viewed five days preceding the Sale ; Catalogue s to b e had on the Premises; at the Essex Arms, Watford ; Ana:, Berkhainpstead ; Swan, Rickmansworth ; 'White H..rs-, bridge ; White Hart, Edgware ; and of Mr. Robins, It street, Golden-square. LANGLEY BURY, HERTS,BEIye FAN U.:ti11...L5., BERKHAMSTE AD. Elegant and fashionable Furniture, large Pier and Glasses, Grand Piano-Forte, Broadwood, French Clock.' Figures and Lights, Pictures, about 600 oZ. of mass j•: . .. , fine Linen, Glass, Chins, Wines, Ale, a Patent various Effects. By Mr. ROBINS, 08 the Premises, on Wednesday, May 10, and two fAlov J. Days, at Eleven &Clock, 'THE elegant HOUSEHOLD FURNI - FIT::!:, Plate, fine Linen, China, Wines, and various E"'-r• • property of a Nobleman, at his Mansion, Langll Be-„ t. • Watford, Herts; comprising lofty French canopy and hurls's-. Bedsteads, with rich palampo and chintz Furniture' mad,. up i n the first style, fine down and feather Beds, eaeelknt Blankets, and Marseilles Quilts, Wardrobes, Chests hi 1 , Dressing-tables and Glasses, elegant French Curtains, in t:•14 .;•• • and chintz cases, Sofas, fauteuil Chairs and ottomans cri large Pier and Chimney Glasses, handsome Axminster and Br ~ sels Carpets, French and Japan Cabinet and Commodts, Lib} • Bookcases, and Writing-tables, Mahogany and Japanned Cl in Morocco, Claw Dining-tables, Sidebeards, Cellerets, Prtat.- fast-tables, &c. &c. the whole well manrfactured and of surt-rio worktnanship, with a variety of culinary articles in coppers and tin, Laundry and Dairy utensils, Garden Ligats, Tools, and va rious other effects. May be viewed on Monday and Tuesday preceding the flle. Catalogues at one shilling each, (without Ns hich none can he ad. mit ted) to be had on the Prtrniaes ;at the Eska A rms, Watford; K ng's Armc, Berkhampstead ; Swab, itickatansworth ; White Hor3e, Usbrilge ; Hart, Edgware; and of Mr. Resins, Warwick-street, Golden-square. RENO VAI'ED HkALI 1-1„ TT has been too frequently the subject of just an.l general reprobation, that men destitute of' the" elements of the medical art have offered themselves as candidates for public patronage in the profession of physic. For the purpose of doing justice to the result of our studies and teperience, are'. to prevent us from being Massed among those emeirics whose in - -to/- dent pretensions blve, unfortunately for society, been toe farmer ably received, we beg leave to submit to the liberal and euitgl.t encd, a faithful statement of our pursuits and acquiretra.:ite After having received a regular medical educaticr, as •1;t• of Messrs. Grindal and Blizard, whose lectures and prance carefully attended, as Profesors and Surgeons of the endcn I pital, we entered ourselves as students in that justly telt-b.-nett school for mt-lical acquirements, the Royal College of Etbe burgh, and were instructed in the different branches trf Alatumv, Surgery, the Theory and Practice of Physic, Chemistry, Mid wifery, Botany, &c. &c. &c by those eminent Protessers, Monro, Gregory, Black, Hamilton, Duncan, and Rutherford. We trust we shall not be deemed presamptuous in saying. tl.it our proficiency and acquirements are not iticoesid.erabb. I for a long series of years made VBNEILEAL COMPLAIN : and the varioes diseases of DEBILITY, the particular oltiect 1 our studies and practice, it will, We hope, bellowed that we ante acquired superior knowledge of their treatment and care. ;it slight and recent cases of infection, a perfect re-establishmet:t completed in the short period of two days, and in those ei tic utmost inveteracy, where other practitioners have failed of ba:- cess, a proper perseverance in our plan of treatment ensures to the patient a safe and radical cure. Aniidst nielancholy variety of disorders which are the ef. fects of a habit long and most unhappily pursued by the ydntli of both sexes, there are twee more alarming or more distressale :hats those deficiencies and debilities which frequently prevent or em bitter the matrimonial state. To such persons it must be a con solieg reflection to know that they may now, by a new and ietal little mode of treatment, be restored to that greatest of Al hanrai blessings, a strovg, manly, and vigorous constitution. In all c iscs of Debility; front-whatever cause arising, as well as in every spe cies of Venereal infection; we may be consulted by path no, of either sex with the greatt st secrecy and honour. Hours of om sultation at hopac from tea to three, and from siz in the eliciting till ten at night. Patients in the country are requested to state the particulars of their oase, age, and general habit of living. &c. inclioing a remit tance for advice and medicines, when the same will be given or ent to any part of the kingdom. To ensure the: secrecy to es sential to our undertaking, the postage of letters ma be added to the account for medicines. _ CIIRRIE and Co. Surzenn•, No. 107, Hatton Garet-. WHEN PROFESSIONAL MEN of Etio:%i;! and Responsibility deviate from the General System by the selection of a particular branch, the sanction of long 4:ominued success is the best criterion of superiority. Fourteen years have we devott d our practice to the exchisive treatment of two disorders, and the successful result c,f our s tar gives us additional ardour to oppoo-, as far as we are chle, the ravages of those complaints which are the most important in the catalogue of human infirmiles. After initiation into every branch of practice, we conteninte the sufferings of Siphylitic and Debilita.ed Paients, and ter::: •: wish to rescue individuals from the ;gnorance of uneducated 7: or the equally dingerous precipitancy of general prsctitioners. The disorders, to the cure of which we have devoted our :•t; n tion, comprise every species of-Venereal Infection, wtlero sr •' r...ceitt or long duration: 2dly, all kinds of Debility, whether ari ing from the habits of school-boys, or the indulgtincies et age.—Numerous diseases are the result of ignorance, or the treatment of a simple Gonorrlicca, and it not unfreqnu tiy bap pens, that the seeds of life are poisoned by the indi;cretice: e: unguarded hour. By a superior method such complaints are easily cured; and even where others have failed, we trust that we may presume offer a radical re-establishment. Few, however, are the cases of complicated distress in this dis order, compared with the calamitous situations of ma, who,. from an indulgence in a Solitary Vice, or the prevalent gaieties a fishionable life, acquire that state f debility, which is the un avoidable consequence of such pernicious habits. Where the unhappy sufferer broodi over his misery, but art fully conceal his misfortima, it may be some consolation for I 'r% to know, that although it be an obect of doubt or uncertairts: with other practitioners, the reinovut of these Marne- , by ;1 1 '' gradual progress of renovation is the acquirement of our experi rce. If the rites of Bacchus or Venus have begun to reduce ut anif vigour, much anxiety will be prevented by an CAI ly coun-erleti:)n t E this languid state, and in those cases, no great difLcuhy will tiro r. But where this deficiency has for years existed, a proper p:• . - verance is indispensibly requisite to revive the slumbering 'pal,: ' of life, and to re-animate the constitution. The secrecy which is so essential to our undertaking, and tl:e qualifications which we presume to state, 'form the basis of cis: pretensions, and the coincidence with such this intirnat len is rdr'''l that Messrs. Leton and Co. niay be consulted rersorly, or I y letter, (inclosing a Bank Note) at their house, No. 9.8, , ‘"tmdt ! ' street, Strand, near Temple Bar.—There is an additioral L7:Le.lllCe in Water-street adjoining, and the name is on both De,ts A Diploma from the Royal College of Surgeons in London, and Testimonials from the mosteminent Physicians and Lecturers of regular education, and assiduous • attention to the studio of every branch of the profession, are open to the inspection a`-f enquirer, and constitute a fair ground ler that success wilt ol!irh we have hitherto been honoured. E. LEIGH and Co. Surr , um* LONDON : Printed and Published by LEVEL !CENT, Co" terbury Ptnee, Lambeth, at the STAa-Orree? No. - 1. Cal.;• street. Published also at the Slut-Or/His. "OM Car' i'