Star. — London, England, 1819-03-10 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. VICZCHANCELLOR'S COURT, MARCH 10. BRADSHAW V. BRADSHAW. Mr. 4oAtt said, this was a motion to have the re port confirmed which the Master shad made in .this case. By the will of the testator, the plaintiffs, who are his children, were made wards of the Court, and the guardians he had appointed were subject to the approbation of the Court. He had several large estates, and an application was formerly made by the plaintiffs said their nearest of kin, that it might be referred to the Master, to inquire and report what number of trees were fit to be cut down and sold. The case accordingly went to the Master, before whom it appeared that upwards of 44)0 trees were fit to be cut down and sold, without delay, as they were beginning to decay. The Master reported that such was his opirlion ; and the application no* made was that the report should be confirmed. • The VICE-CHANCELLOR ordered the report to be confirmed that the sale should take place with the appxobattbn of the nearest of kin, to save expenses ; and that the pmceeds should be paid into Court, to await the final result. COMMON PLEAS. • LOSS 01 LICENSHARTIN V. HOMER. Mr. CAMPBELL opened the case. The declaration stated, that the plaintiff was possessed of a public house, called the Magdalen Coffee-house, in Black friars-road ; that his license was about to expire in September; in the last yeer, and that upon applying to have it renewed, for which purpose he obtained .a certificate from the churchwarden and overseer of the parish thht he was a person of good fame, the slefendant maliciously induced the Governors of the Magdalen Hospital to publish of and concerning him the following This public-house, the Mag dalen Coffee-house, is the resort of bad women of the lowest'class, principally on Sundays, when they are guilty of conduct and language such as is produc tive of the greatest annoyance to persons going to their different places of worship." In consequence of this libel, the Magistrates refused to grant to the plaintiff' a renewal of his license, whereby he was greatly injured, and ruined in circumstances. There were other counts stating the faCts differently. The defendant first pleaded the general issue, not guilty ; and then a justification, namely, that the house was of the character which he had described. This the plaintiff by his replication denied, and upon this is sue was joined. . Mr.'Serjeant Lens impressively described the state of utter destitution to which the plaintiff had been reduced by the conduct of the defendant, who had, from motives which it was difficult to understand, - thought proper to make a representation to the Go vernors of the Magdalen Institution, which induced them to write the libel which had been read, and which being sent in a letter to the licensing Magis trates on the licensing day, caused them to withhold frant the defendant his license. It was impossible to. c!eny, from the local situation of the house in ques tion, that persons of a bad character occasionally vent into it. This could not be prevented. But it ssas e•ell known that the plaintiff, since he had em barked his property in the premises, had .succeeded in utterly pi eventing the disorders which were known to have previously existed, and at the time when this unfoitunate blow %vas struck, he was effecting a gra dual reformation. For this injury he (Mr. Serjeant Lens) wasted -the Jury would feel themielves bound to give the plaintiff a moderate compensation. He would not ask of their hands the amount of the total loss of the plaintiff. becaisse he was satisfied that the instice of the Magistrates, upon hearing the facts of the case, would lead them to renew the license at the first opportunity. Mr. Ware, clerk to the Licensing Magistrates, preyed that he had known the Magdalen Coffee house between 30 and 40 years. He knew that the plaintiff had held the house in the last year, and that lie had applied.in September for a renewal of his li cense, but than it had been 'refused. A letter was sent from the Committee of the .Magdalen Hospital to the Licensing Magistrates, in consequenc e of w hi c h it was that the licence had been stopped.—The letter was here put in and read. . Mr. TARDY objected to several variances beteieen the letter and the record, but the objection was Over ruled by the Court. The, witness, in continuation, said, that from the ' local situation of the Magdalen Coffee-house, it was impossible to keep an improper description eff persons, out of it—he meant women of the town. The-house v.as situated at the corner 9f Dover -street, and he be lieved there was not a house in that street that was not. inhabited by profligate women. William Roberts, clerk to the Magdalen Hospital, • was next called : his evidence went to substance to prove that the defendant had called upon him and asked him whether he had not witnessed the profli gate scenes which were exhibited at the Magdalen Coffee-house ? he said he had. The defendant then expressed a hope that he would mention what he had seen to the Committee, and request them to write their opinion to the Licensing Magistrate of the nui sance which existed. He did so, and in consequence of what he said the letter was written. In cross-examination, lie said, that since the licence hal been stopped, it appeared as if they were not in the same neighbourhood. He often saw women half naked opposite the Hospital, and near to the house • in question. Mr. Robert Pott, the Chairman of the Committee `by whom the letter was written, said that it had been .. written in consequence of the representation of Ito . bens. A Mr. Woodridge having called upon him 'do a sul:sequent day, however, he.wroie another let ter 'to the Magistrates. stating the fact, from Mr. NVeodridge's communication, that the plaintiff had • bee , . in the house bnt two months, and that he had • greatly-refotmed it. Tne Lord Cuter Jrsrtcr now intimated that there was no ground for continuing the cause, as it was manifest, from the testimony of Roberts,ahat the de .4endant had -desired that the Committee should write their own-opinion, and not his. Mr. Serjeant Ltss acquiesced, and the plaintiff was nonsuited. i The Lord Cum itTrricx said he thonght the pub lic were z y indebted t o th e d e f en d ant f or h aving i mb a i Dui nuisance under the notice of the Maga itatentlutioithat period. _. WINCIMSYSi. HAI, Hardie, was isdicted for haring kilied Ed mund Saunders. The deceased was shot by the pri sbner whilst in the act of running away from a turnip field, where he had been committing a robbery. The l'orisoarr • expressed great sorrow for the circumstance. lie was found Guilty of Manslaughter, fined £lOO, and ordered to be imprisoned six months. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. IIAywARD V. YOUNG. This was a writ of inquiry to assess the damages for the breach of an agreement. In Februarys 1812, Mr. Young had engaged with Mr. Hayward, a sur geon and apothecary, at a salary of one hundred guineas a year ; and at the same time bound himself in a bond of £lOOO that if he should at any time dis continue his assistance to Mr. Hayward, he should not set up for himself within twenty miles of Ayles bury, on pain of forfeiting his bond. In April,lBlB, Mr. Hayward and young parted, and Mr. Young then commenced business for himself, and many of the patients, from 12 to 18, whom Mr. Young had attended as for Mr. Hayward, oontinued to be visited by Mr. Young.—A verdict was given for the plain• tiff—Damages £3O, subject to further actions until the £lOOO shall be fully discharged. CHELMSFORD, MARCH' 9. • DOE ON THE DEMISE OF BURDETTO. WEIGHT. This case occupied nearly the whole day, and though dull in the detail of circumstances,, was of considerable importance, and of singular 'circum stances. It was an action of ejectment, to recover possession of an estate called Fanstead Hall, in this county, and of which the defendant had, some few weeks back, been put in possession by the Crown, to whom it had escheated for want of heirs, she having' sbewn her descentfrom one Robert Wright, an ances tor of her family, the grandfather of Lord Keeper Wright, but since that period the present claimant had discovered that he was one degree nearer allied to t' e last possessor, the on of the ancestor from whom she made her descent. _ Mr: 'Serjeant ONsLow stated the case, and various persons froth whom the plaintiff claimed, with great perspicuity, until the estate vested in the last per son, a Mrs. Elizabeth Oglethorpe, the wife of Ge neral Oglethorpe, a gentleman who died some years back at the advanced age of upwards of 100. She, being possessed of the estate, left,it to Mr. Granville Sharpe, for his life, with directions to him to settle the fee for charitabl e uses. This devise being void as to the charitable uses, upon the death of Mr. Gran ville Sharpe the estate would have escheated to the ' Crown, but for the remote title made to it by the de ' fendant, Mrs. Barbara Wright, to whom the Crown delivered it. An advertisement was put into the papers calling for the heirs. This produced a claim by a Sir William Bagnell Burdett, of Ireland, but he could not substantiate his claim, and in the investi gation of his title the present claimant was discover ed, a little tradesman at Hull. The Learned Ser. jeant having given the details of the pedigree, Mr. Cuawoon stated, that they should begin their evidence with the common ancestor of the claimant and person last sized, who was a Mr. Nathan Wright, a merchant of London, and Lord of the Manor of Cranham, in this county; and the first evidence called Was Mr, Ilignold Norroy, King at Arms. He pro duced a visitation, made under the King's Commis sion in 1664, by which it appeared, that at that time the following was the state of the family :—Mr. Na than Wright had then- a son called Benjamin, who , was created a Baronet, the patent of his creation being produced, Nathan Wright's will wit' then read, and it appeared that at his death his family consisted of Benjamin, a daughter, Susan, who was first mar ried to Stephen Potts, Esq. afterwards to Francis Drake, Esq. of which marriages there were six chil dren. His next daughter, Mary, was married to Robert Burdett, an Alderman of London ; a third daughter, Alice, married to a John Wolpin, a mer chant of London ; and two unmarried daughters. Sir Benjamin Wright *was succeeded by his son, Sir Nathan Wright ; this Sir Nathan by his son Sir Na than. The List Sir Nathan, by his brother, Sir Samuel, who seas the last Baronet. He was suc ceeded by his sister, Elizabeth, who married General Oglethorpe, and was the person last seized of the fee, and in her ended the last lineal descendant of the Wrights. nr.Citirtv'then called for the documents to prove the pedigree a the Potts and the Drakes, the descen dants of the marriages of the first daughter of Na than Wright, the common ancestor. The line in the, Potts ended in a single female,who married Sir Wil liam Villiers, of Brooksby, in eicestershire, and, by his monumental inscription, it appeared there was no issue. Of the Drakes there appeared to be five sons, by the two eldest of whom there is issue living. It clearly was' established that, though they descended from the same father, they did not by the same mo ther, and therefore could not inherit, being only of the half blood ; and the extinction of the three of the whole blood were sheen to be extinct. The Counsel for the plaintiff then resorted to the iisuo of the next .daughter, Mary, who married Ro bert Burdett, the merchant, in the early part of Charles the Second. By wills and documents of the family they shewed that Robert Burdett left six sone Nathan, Francis, Robert, Leicester, and Benjamin Burdett ;. of these Robert died at Aleppo, unmar ried; Leicester was busied at Putney, and no men tion was made of issue on his monumental inscription. Francis administered to Nathan, and therefore it was -tO be presumed that he left no issue, and of Francis no traces were found after the legacy left him by his father. Wright Burdett, the fifth son, was Rector of Hornsey ; he had a son called Wright Burdett, who was described of Henley on Thames; he -had a se* also called Wtir,ht Burdett, and from the last am the Claimant descended. These facts were proved bi family wills, illustrating and throwing lights on sick other, by certificates of marriages, births, and bud* by monumental inscriptions, by recitari in deeds I, and when one source of evisjenct failed, such great dili gence had been used, that no lihksithis complkates) case, but what was most fully and clearly establishes). Mr. Justice PARK, who tried the maw, said, he had nererseen a case of deeceat so dearly • and asked Mr. Marry= if be pas prepared to too. overt any of the facts ? • Mt. MenariTt said, Ise bed fret es abjecsiss Its - point law, and spited kW iiiiiciiitrinet• 11qa1 estate, insisting it was ditstanding in the heirs 'ot'Mr:Granville Sharpe. . The Learned Joao' r4id he would not decide that' point of Law, si then, but leave him to move that hereafter. He d also direct the Jury to presume that that term had been' decided. He next ;addressed the Jury, and insisted that the extinction of the elder brothers of the Silt Wright Burdett had not been proved sufficiently, and contended the Jury would presume that they had married and had issuz. Mr. Serjeant Osst,ow having replied with a great deal of humour on the argument that a man should, be presumed to have a wife and children, the• Jury, under the direction of the Learned Judge, found a verdict for the Plaintiff. . DOE, ON TI1! DEMIST 9 , SACKETT, V. 11,p1VEY AND • OTHERS. This was an ejectment to recover the possession of certain premises, consisting of two tenements, situate at Witham, in this county, in the possession of M. Bernard Harvey, a bankrupt. Mr. MARRYATT and Mr. COMM conducted the plaintiff's case, and Mr. GURNEY and Mr. H. I. Srs mint the defendants'. It appeared in evidence, that the premises in ques tion originally belonged to a Mr. Baker, who by his will devised the Name to his son, Thomas Baker, for life, with the remainder in fee to the daughter of the latter, Rachael Baker, who married the fither of the present lessor of the plaintiff. During the life time of the tenant for life, Mr. Matthew Bernard Harvey purchased the premises in question of him in fee, for valuable consideration, on an express undertaking that the mother of the lesior of the plaintiff, who at the 'time of her marriage was under age, should levy a fine, and suffer a recovery under this contract. Mr. ' Harvey had entered upon the possession (f the pre-' mists, and had expended between I:3000 and £4OOO in improving the same. But the mother of the les sor of the plaintiff had never levied any fine nor suf fered any recovery, and the present action was brought by her son and heir against the assignees of Mr. Matthew Bernard Harvey, to recover possession , of the premises. • The case, as above stated, was clearly proved, and the defendant: Counsel being unable to suggest any substantial objection to the ejectment, a verdict was foUnd for the plaintiff. Mr. Justice PARR, in the ccurse of the argument upon the case, said, that under the like circumstances he had, when at the bar on the Northern Circuit, re covered for Lord Byron prorerty to the amount of £lB,OOO in Lancashite. CROWN Stns.—Charles Britten, alias Burton ' was indicted for assaulting John Potter on the WhofMay last, in the parish pf Fyfield, and taking from his per son a £5 Romford Bank note, a. check upon the same Bank for £2O, and two £1 Bank of England notes.—lt appeared is evidence, that the prosecutor was a surgeon, residing at Chipping Ungar. In the evening of the 9th of May last, he had occasion to go upon his. professional duty to Fyfield, and about nine o'clock, it being then light, he saw two men be fore him, and as he approached them on horsehick, he heard one say, , 4 now for it." He slackened the pace of his horse, when the prisoner came up and seized the reins, and desired the prosecutor to stop. The other man then drew .out a horse pistol, and pre senting it at the prosecutor's head, said, " Give us your money, or I'll shoot you." The prosecutor dis ounted and the prisoner rifled his pockets of the property in question, whilst the other man kept his pistol alterrattely at his head and breast. The pro secutor swore positively to the prisoner's identity. The Learned Judge BAYLEY summed up the case, hut the Jury found the prisoner Not Guilty, 'assign ing for Cause that the prosecutor, after the lapse, of five months, might be mistaken in the prisoner'sperson Saturday se'nnight the following daring robberies were committed upon the toll road within a mile of Gatehouse of Fleet, in Galloway, by three men, about seven o'clock in the evening :—lst, Alexander Gov don, printer, in Kirkcudbright, was attacked and robbed of a bill, for 351.15. one shilling of silver and an umbrella-2d, Robert Dickson,farmer in Magree, ho was on horseback, of a 'silver watch ; Thomas Sproat, in Rainton, who was walking alongside of Mr. Dickson, was attacked; made his escape, and was fired at in his retreat, but sustained no injury.- 3d, John Clark, warehouseman to Mr. Samuel Mac naught, merchant, Kirkcudbright; and James Par ker, Innkeeper at Twynholm Kirk, both on horseback, and in company, were attacked ; Parker, by striking sevetely the man . who seized his horse, escaped, he also was fired at, but without doing him any injury ; Clark was dragged from his Wine, and robbed of his watch, and about I Ss. in silver, but they missed a considerable sum in notes.-4th, James Rain, inTown head, was also attacked, butescaped. Clark, on his arrival at Kirkcudbright, about tea o'clock, imme diately communicated the particulars of the attack upon him and Parker without knowing any thing .o f the others, to the Procurator w - ho dispatched a party o f ! officers to the Magistrates of Gatehouse, with such information, that in consequence two ounsf thee! re! robbersw'ere apprehended next morning before it was almost known in Gatehouse the robberies had happened. All three are from Ireland, viz.—Arthur M'Kean, weaver, in Dumfries; John Stott, weaver, in Maxwelltown, and John Kelly, labourer in Castle Dopglas. M.Kean and Kelly, and a man, M 4 Millan; who assisted in the escape of Stott, are committed to Kirkcudbright jail. A dating burglary was attempted at the Hour Glass Inn, oa Walworth Conimcm. 'Between twelve and one o'clockson Monday night, one of the lodgers at the Inn was alarmed by a noise, in consequence of which he got out of bed, and saw two men very busily employed in pecforating the wall of the wine cellar ; he got a loaded blunderbuss; which hung in the room; then pulled up the sash, and called out to the thieves, upon which one of them pulled out a large holster pistoi, and discharged it at his head. It completely shattered several squares of glass, and carried away a part of the sash. The ball passed doe, to the gen tleman's ear, and lodged in the wainscot at the end of the room, fortunately doing . him no mischief.— Snow, an active constable, who lives on the Common, was alarmed by the report of the pistol, aid proceed ed immediately to the spat, but the fellows made their escape through the brick fields, at the back, keying their booty behind threat Nicisel Cind, . j aharged with ettmieg forged Wft Mit% biolte out of ika cot in (wag of llogadity islais)+s. • . . DUBLIV, THE TRIMLESTON CAUSE. LLOYD V. TRIMLISTON. This very important case, which had fcr days occupied so large a share of legal argument iuvesiigation, in the Common Pleas, was deticed eleven o'clock last night by the Jury, which 1 . , 4 , been engaged in delibe ra ti o n on i t f rom 2aterea evening, giving their verdict in fayour of Lcre3, 44 leston. The terms in which the Jury deli-cred isf• verdict were, " That the paper bearing date the c. of December, 1812, is not the last will and terier t , of the late Lord Trimleston."—Judge consent of both parties, took the decLion of th: on Sunday, (last night), in order to preven t necessity of their further confinement. BI RTHS. • Yesterday, in Hamilton-Place, the infant son of the t. tt Bedford. Lately, at Burnet, near Bath, the Lady of Colonel ZtK of a daughter. Monday, at the Vicarage Cropredy, near Banbery,:ll of the Rev. W. 1). Conybeare, bf a 1102. ----DIED. Sunday, in Lower Seymotir-street, cf a I:cldea rrrk attack, Sophia. wife of Lieutenant-Colonel ShedJez, ct Dm, hear Lyinington. SARACEN'S HEAD, SNOW-HILL, LONDO;. *WILLIAM MOUNTAIN AND CO.' Four InsidC Coaches, best Horses, and keep their Thr.e. T HE following Post-Coaches, Mail-Coaches, & • set out from the above Inn: FALMOUTH, Plymouth, Totnea, Exeter, Weyme Dorchester, Dartmouth, and Salislasury, new Post Coach, te r Morning at Seven; through Honiton, Axminster, liridfor Blandford, Basingstoke, and Bagshot. Arrives at Plyrssl.• the next Evening at half-past eight. SOUTHAMPTON, I .yrnington, Winchester, Andover, Basingstoke new Four Inside Coach, at half-past seven is morning, us-Wei at the Dolphin Inn, Southampton, by hail • tree. This is a most delightful conveyance to the Isle of Wit Havre de Grace, Jersey, Guernsey, St. Maisie's, Cherbourg, . BATH and BRIStOL Flying Pest-Coaches, through • peuham, Calne, and Marlborough, every afternoon; arsine Mr. May's, the Greyhound Inn, Bath, and the London Tts Thomas -street, and the Swan, Bristul, next morning. Co to WeM, Bridgewater, Taunton, Exeter, and Plymcr-th. The UMPIRE, a New LIVERPOOL Light Goad, or one night on the road, carrying four insides and four Outliers, out daily; through Dunstable, Woburn, Luthbory, Nur.)urp ton, Welford, Lutterworth, Hinckley, Ml:crania, Litckte . Shone, hugely, Newcastle, Knuteford, Warrington, and Prat SHREWSBURY, Wellington, and Shill:sal Puss -C . . every evening, at five o'clock—Guardcd. WRY NI ouTH, Dorchester, Blandfurd, Salisbury, A ndcvn and Basingstoke new Post-Coach, every afternoon. The W mouth packets to GuPrnsey, Jersey, Cherburg, St. M2loa . i, LEEDS new Light Coach, called the Rockingham, err , morning at eight; carries Four Insides only, goes rentarta'.'i easy, with a • Guard throughout; passes through Stam4nl Newark, Retford, Doncaster, and Ferrybridge, to the GO:- Lion, Leeds, next morning. Notwithstanding 'the uncomngs expedition of this Coach, it is allowed to be the most sgrteabk and complete public conveyance on the North Road, bel i ng equalled by any other. • GLASGOW, Longtown; Gretna-Green, Amnia, Durg: 4 !- Brownhill, Thornhill, Sanquhar-Kiln; Cumnock, all Parts of Scotland; a Post-Coach, (Daily). YORK, Scarbormigjr, Whitty, Shields, Sunderland, Ns7; castle, and Edirhurgh hew Four Inside Coach, thh a Gt..- throughout ; sets out every miming, by way of Newark, P.- ford, radcaster, Darlington, Northallerton Durham, liorple sad Berwick. Pauangers finding , themse lves fatigued on jourdey, may rest what time they please, and theh proceed e. without any additional fare. MARLBOROUGH, and Swindon • new four-inside Pee Coach, through Aidbourn, Reeding, fArabouro, Purton, L. ditsgtos, Pitney, Wootton Basset, Ramsbury„ Huey:ford, an Newbury ; every morning. BRIDGRNORTH and Walsall Post. Couch, every weer! BOSTON, Spalding. Peterborough, States, and Humingde Royal Mail-Coach, every evening to Spilsby, Louth, GrimsLy and flull. CARLISLE. Pounds, and Whitehaven, pour Inside Post Coach, and a G ward all the way. Passes through Brough, pleby. Greatabridge, Richmond, Caneriek, Boroagbridge, Ke fberby,Aberford,Doncaster, and Grantham. Sets out every mons ing, and performs the journey filth the politest facility. Pante. gets detained on the road by boluses, or ure, have the peer liar fdvaatage of their seats big rice ed in the neat Cash. KENDAL; Lancaster. Pray" Klrlsy-Lonsdale, Beat Chorley, Ormskirk, and Oarsesio Post-Coaches, every Ammo LIVERPOOL, Warrieghsa, Kontsford, Stow, Statord,nl Litchfield Post-Cotach, the Dillson,every smug, to the S)- raeen's Head Inn, Dekko:lnt, lAverpook.-thardsd diteerbout• WAKEFIELD Post-Cosels, evert shaviog. • CHESTER( N Whitehttreh; Tarporley, Nantwi,b, Nosthwiels, and eh Post-Cosch every evening. SUNDERLAND, Seecktosi, tad Yana, Coach, every Rory' ing, to the George Inn Sunderland. MANCHESTER, Winslow, Cootie:eon, Newcastle, Walr-4 and Wolverhampton Post-Coach; every afternoon—Ganda SHEFFIELD and Rotherham Post-Coach, called the Rock ingham, every smarming. BI R MIN GRA Past-Coach, Ovarded, lets oat every after noon, and reaches Birmingham neat day at noon. Passes by Warwick, Leamington, and Deventry, to the Saracen's Herd, Bull-street, Birmingha m. Northeave, Howden, Thorn, and Doncaster Post Coach, every Morning , at half-put six, to the Cross Key., liat ket-plama Hull. DOVER, Deal, ate, Sandwich, Ramsgate, Canterbury, Faversham, Chatham, , and Stroud, Pon -Coady% noon. and ‘ edght. HERTFORD, Ware„Hoddosdon,and Cheshuat Coach every Morning. -rr W. MOUNTAIN and Co. respeetfulli acquaint theill Friends and the Public, that they will not he accountable far any Parcels. Passengers' Luggage, Writinp, Plate, An of more than Fins Pomade wage, if lost, stolen, or dastard, makes elite" as seek and the beennace paid for accordingly, at the Saracen's Snow-hM, Loads*. BY HIS MAJESTY'S ROYAL LETTERS PATEN I'. f .EAKE'S GENUINE PILLS, justly Il mr.U/ -2 -A for curing, Ind! its stages, the VENEREAL DISEASE. One email Pill is a dose, and the taking of one Box, In a reset case, will soon convince the patient of the certainty of his speed/ tsessity. Nothing Can be better condived, more sale, or mon convenient than this Remedy, for sods as are obliged to go jeer' nits or to sea, asst needs no confinement nor restraint of din: and sixty years experience (in an extensive practice) has proved that it will effect a Core when repeated Sallvaden and all otter methods avail nothing.. For the Scurvy sad other Chronics! Mortises, aids Medicine has net Its parallel. U;wardt 40,000 persons of both sexes have been radically eared o• the above cruel disorders, within the lass eight years. Prep sold by the Sob Proprietors, T. TAYLOR ' and SON; Adeir' of the Royal College of Surgeons, at their House, No. 9, Nto Bridgoitrset, in Boxes of only Is. 9d. esth, duty 111 ° 1164 ' . N.B. Two both doors, and Lights in the Passages at night The, are also moll by their appointment, with copious direciet! alas Toy Ship, 103, Oxford-street; Mr. Dlsborough's,Ni." Eldostreel-hill, neatly opposite the Manitowoc ; and by ooh Person in every considerable Town In Oreatsßritain and IreiSOS Advice grads to poisons takini the above, or other of the Is'e. prime's McNeish*. COAL MARKET. Maw 10. Ships at Market. Ships Sold.. Prim _ , {it Nawcaatle Is, 311 a 6d to 4Si 3.1 Stuttlethad • ' s 44s 64_t_a_o______.0" MOH WAWA at LONDON • Mad* Aft EDGE TC-AlOll ROW. 40 minutes after 9 59 ........... ........9 . ...._. LONDON; . Published by Loo, Loh 1'+:d.:;• Icopk-Lu! 1 If i 7~ iV