Star. — London, England, 1811-05-14 00:00:00

P:* Does your Li,lyship recollect at what pnicil it was, --------- ..tyship May remember whether the state, that that brother first took the itasne of Tudor ?—lt of your health was so bad as to require the daily at- was the Litter end of 1784, or th e be g innin g of 1785 ; tendince of a medical person ?—I was unwell, but on 1 I know that when he was at Mr: Parker's, he always that subject I cannot answer more fully. ! signed his narnt.Tudor in Mr. Parker's day-book. If the state of yriur Ladyship's health was such as At what tithe did he first go to Mr. Parker's ?—I to produce a temporary separation from Lord Berke- , think that I have already stated it to be thelatter end ley, I presume it was such .as to require the constant of 1784 or the beginning of 178.: daily attendance of a 'medical person ?—I cannot Prior to that time he always went by the name of here give a more distinct answer to that question, but Wm. Cole ?—I cannot answer that question, because I could give an answer to Doctor Denman, or any I was not in Gloucester. person of that description, who would see me on the I Perhaps your Ladyship may know what name your subject. own brother went by before that time ?—I always un- The Counsel were directed to withdraw. dersteod that he was christened Tudor; I have heard The Countess of Berkeley was directed to withdraw. so at a very early period before any unexpected change The Counsel were again called in. ' took place. The Countess of Berkeley was again called in, and t What circumstances induced your Ladyship to take her Ladyship was informed, there was no imendon the name of Tudor ?—lt was my husband's pleasure. to ask her as to the nature of the disorder, but, ' No other reason than that ?—My brother's name Who was the medioal person who attended her being Tudor, I believe was the reason for it. Ladyship in town 'from the time•of her marriage to Do you recollect any one person who ever called the time of her go;ng,to Gloucester ? Ido nor know your Ladyship's brother Tudor before the marriage ? the name of the medircal pefson, who attended'me'at —I was not with him for a year before the marriage. that time, it wasn't Ittediol - person whpwas sent to. Had your Ladyship, prior to that, ever heard any Had your Lady Weston, to call in any medi. person call him by the name of Tu dor ; and, if so, cal man when ru, ' o at Gloticester ? Yes. 111 1 who was it ?-1 may have called him so m y self, but Whom ? Mr. NA .. .• , • Ido not recollect any other person who called him so Is he livingyor dead? 'Hess dlit - ad. at this distant period of time. Had you: Ladyship'bccatkai -for the attendanie of . Your Ladyship does not recollect any member of any other medical person at Gloteesler ? ' No. , the. family, or any parson who had ever before called At what place m Gloucester Aeas.your Ladyship him ley the name of Tudor ?—No, I do not recollect attended by Mr. Parker ? My sister fllka house in ant ding about it. Southgate-street, I think the name of iris) thestreet 'He was always called by the tame of Wm. Cole ? -• leAdin'Y to Berkeley. , —I cannot say that he was, I was not with him. 0 'What sister was that ? Mrs. Farren. ' Hew came he to take up the nzme of Tudor in How long did your Ladyship continue with that 1784 .? 7 4 always understood that he had relations off sister ? 'I was at Gloucester till August or Septem- the name of Tudor, and I remember once going to Mal.,-1 ber, as nearly as I can recollect, vein Hills to visit an aunt ; I had always understood , And continued during the whole of that time at from my eldest sister that there was soe relation of ' 1 the house of Mrs. Farren ? Yes. the name of Tudor but I cannot ta ke upon me to Was your Ladyship visited by Lord Berkeley ? 1 answer more distinctly. saw Lord Berkeley in Gloucester during that period. Your Ladyship will have the goodness to state who Hew often ? I cannot say how often. that aunt was ?—.I cannot state who that aunt was, Irons the month of May to the month of August but I remember being taken to Malvern Hills when I er September was three or four months ; during that was quite a child. ~ . time is it to be understood, that Lord Berkeley visit- During the time Tod!. Ladyship was at Southgate ed your Ladyship at Mrs. Farren's house, had any street, at Mrs. Farren's, from the month of May to tteals with you, or lived with you there ? No. the month of August or September following, does Where was Lord Berkeley ? I was very unwell, your Ladyship remember being visited by any bar and cannot answer to where he was. sister there ?—Yes, I do. How often or nearly as your Ladyship can recol- What was his name ?—Fendall. lect during that interval from May to August or Was your Ladyship previously acquainted with September may your Ladyship halo seen Lord Berke- him ? I cannot recollect whether I saw him once or ley ? I saw him several times, but I cannot exactly twice. He drank tea once er twice at my sister's. say how often. Had your Ladyship ever been acquainted with him Did your Ladyship see him ten time s durin g that prior to the time of Ids coming to drink tea with you ? interval ? At the distance of six or seven and twenty -4 cannot recollect whether I had or not, or whether years, I cannot answer upon my oath as to how many my sister had met him or not. times I saw him.. Did he come alone, or with any other Gentleman ? Can your Ladyship recollect the name of any one —I think he came alime. person who saw Lord Berkeley in company with your Did he repeat his visits ?—I think he was there Ladyship at either of these houses ?—I do not think twice, as far as I recollect. there is any person now livin g . who did see Lord Not oftener ? — N o, Ido not think it was oftener. 'n In' ',orni - at either of those houses, And your Ladyship had prior to that time no ac , ... Berkeley in my ct_ Ipany . except my brother, who saw him once at the house quaintance with him at all ?—I do not think I had. of Mr. Parker. Did your Ladyship ever correspond with him ?—I Tour Ladyship means Mr. Tudor ?—Yes. wrote one letter to him. Was Mr. Tudor living at Gloucester when your Where ?—He went the circuit, and wrote to me. Ladyship saw him there ?—He was living at Mr. HAS your Ladyship R copy of that letter ?—No ; Parker's. but I should like to read to the House of Lords, a A lodger at Mr. Parker's ?—He was to have been letter which I wrote to a friend of his to shew him, brought up as a surgeon ; and he was living then six months ago, in consequence of his having taken with Mr. Parker to learn his profession as a surgeon. great liberties in representing the transactions, because And he sew your Ladyship once with Lord Berke- lam sure no blame or spot whatever can be attached ley at Mr. Parker's ?—Ycs, I think he did. to my character. Can your Ladyship recollect any person who saw Your Ladyship recollects having written one letter Lord Berkel4 from May to August or September, to him ?—Yes ; I did ; and if it could be produced, 1785, at Mrs. Farren's house ?—I cannot recollect that would at once clear up the whole thing, without any one. When he was there care was taken that no- my producing the letter to which I have now alluded. body saw him. Your Ladyship never sent, through the medium of Had your Ladyship at that time any servant at- any person, to desire to have your letter delivered up tendant upon you ?—I had my sister's servant. The to you ?—No ; but I beard Mr. Fendall had talked on house was in fact mine, because I paid the rent of it. the subject by insinuation, and not speaking out, that Mrs. Farren is dead ?—She is. he knew a great deal of Lady Berkeley, and I wrote Is she servant who attended Mrs. Farren living ? a letter to Mr. Westfaling, stating the transaction, I do not know, indeed, which letter was put into Mr. Fendall's hands, and he By what. name did your Ladyship gn, while you sent his compliments back to me , and that he knew were at that house ?—I think b y m y own name. I; no more of the circumstances of thz marriage than think that persons who knew me called me Miss Cole.l what I stated in the letter. Was your Ladyship's sister unacquainted with the I Then her Ladyship requested to know whether the marriage ?—While I was in Gloucester my sister was . letter she had mentioned might be read. unacquainted with the marriage. Mr. Attorney• General submitted it was not admit Was your Ladyship's mother acquainted with the Bible ; but left it to the decision of the House. marriage?—Not at that time. Her Ladyship was informed, that in point of form When was she acquainted with it ?—ln 1786, so the letter could not now be read. far as I recollect; but lam not speaking positively Your Ladyship spoke of being acquainted with that she had a knowledge of it at that time. Lord Berkeley when you were at Mrs. Clark's school, Was your Ladyship living with your mother at was Lord Berkeley living . in Gloucester at the time the time it'was settled that there was to be a mar- i you speak of being acquainted with him, at the time • riage ?—No. I you r L ad y shi p was at school ?—I do not know if he 'Where was your Ladyship's mother then living . ? was then living at Gloucester. —tri Gloucester, I believe. I was in Kent when, it 1 Was not your Ladyship sufficiently acquainted with was settled that I was to be married ; and my mother Lord Berkeley to know where he lived ?—No ; I was was then in Gloucester. I avoiding him by all means in my power. Where was Mr. Tudor living at the time it was , Atter your Ladyship went to London, in the month• communicated to him that there was to be this mar.; of August or September, 1783, where did you go riage npon the :30th of March, 1785 ?—lf he was not to ?—I had a lodging in Geo ge-street, Hanover with Mr. Parker, he must have been living with his square. id D your Ladyship continue to live there for som e sister, Mrs. Farren, at that time . ' Does your Ladyship know who communicated it , time ?—I remained there while my house in Park to him that there was to be this marriage on the 30th : street was preparing for my reception ; and in the be d' March, 178.5 ?—Yes,- 1 did it myself, by letter. ginning of 1786 I went to that house. Does your Ladyship recollect in what month it ' From the beginning of 1786, to December, 1786, 'R as that you communicated that circumstance to Mr. where did your Ladyship live in London ?—in Park- TuJor t—When I wrote to him, it was flied on what 4 street . d tyilhe bans should be published, because I was l All the time ?—Yes ; unless I went to Cranford, -anxious that he should go over to Berkeley to bear which I do not at this time recollect ; I know that I tlierifpublislied. • did at times go to Cranford from London. -How old was your Ladyship's brother it the time - . . is .it to be understood that your Ladyship, after he was made the confident of this secret ?—I cannot your return to London in August or September, 'each'; but itihay be easily known. 1785, lived alone, in lodgings provided by Lord About the age of sixteenl—l do not know exactly i Berkeley, until the birth of your eldest son ? —Lord .at this moment, but I think it may be about the age yi Berkely had a house in Grafton-street, but I think I - 'mentioned. • • 1 may say 1 lived alone ;I do not mean to say Lord Was he she only'persun of - the faty . •to whorn • . inanla ? Berkeley did not visit me during . that time. Ire& Ladyship totsd...,._____" • the intend a ge INo female lived with your La dyship ?—No female --Certainly. heed with me certainly. Your Ladyship bad it tit tin* two sisters and a I Does your Ladyship recollect how you went up to mother living ?—Yes. London in August or September, 1785 ?—No ; I do Why did your Ladyship prefer toinive as a witness not recollect. of this marriage your brother, a boy At 16,rather than I , Was it in the stage ?—I rather think it was. one of your sisters or your mother ? etaOsel . thought Does your Ladyship recollect being met by a p e r . B . I do uld best depend upon my brother. • ter at the Gloucester Coffee-house when you arrived ? Whe 1 n did your brother le ase the otiuntry, and go —No, I do not remember having been met by a por abroad ?—I 1 1, :nk the b e g innin g of 1787, as nearly as Icas recollect, it was a f ter the bi rt h o f my oldest son . ter at the Gloucester Coffee-house. Y6u'r Ladyship may I Does your Ladyship recollect to what house you went from the Gloucester Coffee4TOUSe on your arri val when you alighted from the stage ?—To Mount street or South-street, I rather think Mount-street, one of the lodgings I have mentioned. The question related to your going to London in August or September, 1785 ?—No ; I did not under stand that ; if it was meant after I had resided in Gloucester, I went to George-street. Is that the time your Ladyship went in the stage ; coach ?—Yes ; I think it WAS a machine called a Di ligence. Without any companion ?—I think so. Where did your sister Turnet live at that time ? q.. I cannot tell. Did your Ladyship cease to be acquainted with her en your return to London in 1785 ?---I cannot say I ceased to be acquainted with her ; the last time I ever saw her was in 1786. Did you not continue to be on the same friendly footing with your sister Turner on your return in Au gust, 1785, as you had been before ?—Not quite. Did you visit one another ?—Seldom. Was your Ladyship in her house ?—Yes ; when my eldest sister came from Gloucester she was there. Was your Ladyship yourself ever living in the house of your sister Turner after you came to Lon don in August or September 1785 ?—No ; not after August or September, 1785. Your Ladyship has spoken to the marriage which took place in May, 1796 ?—Yes. That was at Lambeth 2—Yes. Before that marriage took place, in what parish were Lord Berkeley and your Ladyship resident ? In Spring Gardens, where I live now. Was your Ladyship constantly resident for some time before that marriage took place in Spring Gar dens ?—Except when I was at Cranfield or Berkeley Castle, those and Spring Gardens were the usual places of our residence. Did you for six months prior to the marriage in 1796 reside at' any other place at all ?—Perhaps I might be at Weymouth, but I cannot exactly point Lout. The question is four 'or five months prior to May, 1796 ?—I might have been at Berkeley ; I was not in London ; I think I was not at Lambeth. Where was the first son that was born after the second marriage baptized first ?—At St. Martin's in the Fields. Had he been,privately baptized in Spring-gardens? —.I forget whether he was or not. What name was he baptized by ?—Thomas Mor ton Fitzharding. Was he not baptized by the name of Lord Dursley, er that name inserted in the register ? Mr. Serjeant BEST objected to the question, stating, that the registry was the proper evidence. Who, if any, body, gave directions for his being re gistered _by the name of Lord Dursley ?—I do not recollect at this period; but if I had been consulted I should not have objected. Does not your Ladyship know that it was by the direction of Lord Berkeley himself given in writing that he was registered Lord Dursley ?—No, I do not know it ; if it was so, I do not know it. Perhaps your Ladyship may recollect who were the sponsors to this person who was registered by the name of Lord Dursley ?—He was half-baptized here i when he was registered ; he was christened at Berke ley Castle afterwards, and Lord Euston and Colonel Kingscot were the sponsors at Berkeley Castle. This person who was registered Lord Dursley was not called by the name of Lord Dursley for any con siderable time ?—Never. Can you account for how he came to be registered by that name ?—The impression upon my mind at that time was, that there would be no possibility at that time of proving the first marriage, or I should never have entered into a second. Your Ladyship spoke of having consulted Mr. Bearcroft on that subject ?—Yes, I did. Is it to be understood that those were the senti ments and expressions of Mr. Bearcroft ?—He re commended a second marriage most strongly, cer• . 8 . tamly. What were the reasons which produced a tempo rary concealment of the marriage ? Mr. Serjeant BEST, as Counsel for the claimant, , informed the Committee, that, on a former enquiry, Lord Berkeley stated that there were particOlar rea sons for concealing the marriage, but which, to avoid wounding the feelings of a particular person, he did not wish then to bring forward ; to prove, however, that they did exist, he had communicated them in private, and amongst others, to his Royal Highness the Prince Regent. The Counsel was informed, that if he meant to make that statement as a ground of objection to the question being asked, it was no legal objection. Mr. Serjeant BEST stating that he did not offer it as a legal ground of objection, he was informed, that the Counsel were to put such questions &IS they might think proper to propose ; and if not improper, the Committee would entertain them. —Adjourned. RETURN of W HEAT in Mark-lane. including only irons the 29th of April to the 4th of May. Total 6.793 quarters. Average 835 . 110. id —os. .la last return. A RETURN OF FLOUR. From the 27th of Apia to the 3d ol May. Total 17.966 sacks—Average 7.. R Os. Oid. lower than last return. On the 6th instant, at Blackheath, the Lady of Captain Far rington, Royal Artillery, of a son. On the Soh inst. at Windsor, the lady of Captain Markham Sherwin, of the King's awn Stafford ?Atha*, of a daughter. -------- MARRIED. Saturday, a Sr. Georges Church, Hanover-square, William Hargood, Esq. Rear-Admiral of the Blue, to Maria, third daughter of the late Themas Somers Cocks, Esq. Saturday, at St. Mary-la-Bonne Church, the Rev. John Bah. lard, Easton, Hampshire, to Sophia, widow of the late Robert Moss. Esq. ---------- _ DIED. May 6th, at Upton upon Severn, in Worcestershire, Mrs. Houstoun, wife of Lieutenant-Colonel Houston's, and third daughter of William Whitmore, Esq. of budmaston Hall, Shrop- . , On the 48th ult. at Greenwich, William Crawford, Esq. of Kelso, North Britain. On the Bth instant, at Bury St. Edmund's, in the prime of life, after a lingering disorder, Mrs. Oakes, wife of 0641 Oakes,Esq. Her personal and mental accomplishrnedts gained the admiration, and her loveliness of disposition and benevolence of character commanded the attachment of all who knew her. She was tell. glous without superstition, and pious without affectation. She united is so unusual a manner the great qualities of the head, and the amiable virtues of the heart, that it is more easy to lament her Lau, than to imitate her actiop:, as a friend, a wife and a slather. ; .SALYS BY AUCTION. ESTATES' in den comror id DONEGALL, IRELAND. TO RE PEREMPTORILY RE-gOLD, In Eight Lots, pursuant to cersain Orders of the Htgh Nutt ef Chancery iu England, made in causes intitktl " Downes v. 'Them:4," (the last of which Orders was made with the ctn. sent of the Marquis of Donegan, who has c•iveninterl R. 61 agreed to concur in such resale, and to join In the Cotaterarets to the Purchasers), CERTAIN LANDS, HEREDITAMENTS, and PREMISES, comprised - in the*Maniirs of BONCRA. NAGH and ELOGH, in the county of Donrg.il , In the hingduna of Ireland, part of the Estates of the Marquis iit DONEGAL t , aud containing in the whale 43,000 Acres. or thereabouts, tor co la .. expired Term of One Thousand Years, at a Popper Oen gg e „ 4 subject to several valid Leases subsisting on the mud Estatrei— before Somers. CourroN Esquire, one (if o w Matters of the said Court, at the Public Sale Room of the salt Cher , Seuthampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, On Friday, t he twenty-fourth day of May, at I , at One o'clock in the Al. ternoon, subject to the Conditions expressed in the Fan ta il Particulars, which may be had (gratis) at the said Master's Chino, hers, in Southampton-buildings; of Meilen Akhlitge and Colley Smith, Solicitors, Lincoln's-Inn ;of Messrs. Loaves. Solicitors, loner-Temple; of Messrs. Whitton, Solicitors, Great laws street, Bedford-row ; of Mr. Jaques, Land Sue‘ryor, Haugh. Garden; of Mr. William Espinalwe, Solicitor, Stephen's.grees, Dublin ; and at most of the principal Imp in the neig'ihourbo o g a the Estates. ALDRIDGE and COLLEY smrt H. Lincolit's.ktn. CHICHESTER.—By Mr. W1:1.1.5- On Monday, the 47th ef May, 1811, at the Dolphin bin, pi. cheater, between the hours of hire and skis the Evelio?, . A TRULY Desirable FREEHOLD ESTA I'E, partly exonerated from Land Was.' Consisting ef :modern Building., comprising two grooJ Lefts and attached Offices, built with grey stock brick, which, wilt a entail addition and at no considerable expence, may be tram into a Cottage brnee, nearly in the centre of Tea Asses a. e. a Half of rich Meadow Land. 1 The Ground has been most judicloosly and tastefully laid out a limi t s end shrubberies. skirting the boundaries of the :noutios. It was originally the intention of the Proprietor to en-ct I ViliS on this very eligible spot : the Carden is ii.cloiesl by a lofty rry stock brick wall, well clothed with choice fruit trees, which, wick the shrubs, are nearly In a state of maturity. It isa sit 111:11(1 pt,_ eminently caltulated tor building on, commanding a debated view of the City of Chichester and Its vicinage, and le it. iip-..0 n half a mile from the centre of the town. 'Eta pro; erty holds oat tb the intelligent speculator various objects of advantage,waitcb cannot fall being realized. Immediate possession will be given, and further ParlouLui may be known of Mr. Weller. ,Chtchester. iita HANTS,— , Ey Mi. WELLER, At the Star Inn, Portchester, at Twelve o'Chsck, on Friday, the 17th of May, 11111, THE foliating FREEHOLD ESTATES :._.. Lot I. A substantial, recently built, • BRICK HOlhfi. Slated; the interior is well-finished, and the principal run 116 are neatly ornamented, and consist, on the ground Bi.or, of a r.at Vestibule and Staircase, Eating room 16 tree 6 ii:clits by 14 feet 4 inches, with two Iteoesses !Pied ep with Sideboards, Kiich. rt. Scullery, Pantry, and Cellar. Fink Floor, a handsome Draw: , g Room, of the same dimensions as the Dining Parham, t good Bed Chambers, and Servants' Rooms with numerous Clo detached Out-offices or every description, with a rump of end lent Water, with a large Garden and (rent Court. • The domestic arrangements, moderate 'faxes, facility of com munication almost hourly with Portsmouth, as well as i t s . vat Western road, pleasing marine and land views, acknowi, as salubrity of the air, render this situation an a g reeable and el a.ble retirement for families of Naval and Military gentlemen ;'now in the occupation of Captain Patterson, R.N. Lot 2. An equally SUBSTANTIAL RESIDE) CE, uniformly isullt on the same plan and scale, wi , h the like cooveniencies .rd accommodations of Lor I, now in the occupation of LieutenaLt Gooding, R.N. who will give an early possession. 1 Lot S. A very large DOUBLE COT I'AGE, with an extensive front, with a Well of good Water, , and an excellent Garden, at a small distance from the aforetnewioned Lots These pr are well situated fur business, and may at a soull expe.•ce he convened into two distinct Houses :or tihops ; the demands of this plate are very considerable, there are at this period mar Ono• persons in the Castle and Barracks, and• in lime of war it will ever bold the foremost rank as a depot for prisoners, and io peace for extensive military stores and barracks. ' Particulars may be had at the Inns of the neighbouring times, ' at the Star Inn, Portchester ; where, on application , the prenmes may be viewed; of Messrs. Mot=ley and Co. Portsmouth, and of Mr. Weller, Chichester. SUSSEX. AN EXCELLENT MANSION, WITH LIGH. Y-ONE AC4.ES OF LAND. By Mr. WEI.I.ER, On the Premises, on Tuesday, the ISth of June. 1511, at twelve, THE truly Valuable and Desirable it REEHOLD ESTATE of AVISFORD .PLACE, the Resider= of Admiral MIIIINTAGQ, (Exonerated from Landau) Comprising—a most substantial Mansion, in a complete state of solid and ornamental reptir i and conraim, in the bast•in,nt, ample Cellarage ;on the grou nd Boor, a handsome Hall and Staircase, well proportioned Eating and Breakian Rooms, and a net Library and Greenhouse, likewise Domestic °aced. leplere with eonveniericier of every description; on the first floor, a very fine proportioned Drawing Room, six airy lied Chamber., loer Dressing Rooms, Water Closets, four large Attics, Store Rooms and Housemaias Cinders, capacious*Fanks and good spring rate; a large Kitchen Garden and Melon Ground. inclosed lofty walls covered with the choicest Fruit Trees, fine Espaliers and Filbert hedges, abundantly cropped with Vegetables, 'Fool Hone, capital six stalled Stable, Lofts, two Carriage Houses,a very con, , Mete fitted up Brewhouse, Granary, Drying Yard, and l'onkry. Houses. 'this delightful Residence is situate in a Lawn of 4- wards of Fifty Acres,beitrdby a luxuriant Shrubbery and Pleasure Grounds, the agricultural Buildings, which are very cem l .l.l:, are in a Dell, screened from view by Forest Trees. The reimmit.g part of the Land surrounds tke Paddock with three neat (*.Aram and Gardens. The eligibility of situation, unrivalled beauty of country, i:s extensive marine and land prospects of hill and da1..., and a .1 , - lightfully featured cam. •ipaign country, cannot be sufficient!! Sr scribed—it must be urn to be properly appreciated; the it o peculiarly dry, the air salubrious and healthy, in a Melly r. rC , able neighbourhood, surrounded by the best roads, near a ta,:ora;.. able and retired Watering Place, and a very short digauce iron the Duke of Richmond's Fox limn& Descriptive Particulars will be published one month yrer; ,-. 1 to the Sale ; and may be had at the Auction Mart ' • 'ot Winotanlny.Paternoater‘row • Mr. H. Phillips, Bond.strtet the Libraries, 'flinhridge Weil*, Brighton, Worthing, and Lk/. nor; at the principal Inns in themeighbeuring Market Towss; and of Mr. Weller. Chichester, d whop Tickets may be had is view, front the Ist of May to the der of sale. THOMAS LAMB, ail% New Nevmham:street , Edgeware-road, wai al beted four or Eve years with spur tular Eruption, the irmappeamace4y,which,Wla itl his face asd hands, and then irsprtod over-las . About Chris* mai, ISO?, the usual period of the year when these diseases are always ar gravated;the soles of his feet. were so covered that he was walk to walk; finding no relief front hit .modjmkadsisers, lie applirti its Jane, 1810, to the Dispensary, 15, Soho-square; and by t.d.irg SPaszVitr's PA.TINT ANTIsCOMTIC Decors, w hich It has not now relinquished, all his symptoms are removed, and bi . ~t o t words are," I am perfectly ref:seek-id." His compleetioo is p.ir. and his stature has the appearance of being eshaasted by groo in tseycnd his strength, and the chief seat of his disease settled tots 1 a defect In the digestive organs, which were co rsiderahl y d, ranol. 1 In Sevophula, the powers of this medicine are most cattle tar I nary, and the numerous cures speak its decid ed su p ertority. Asthere are numerous connterfeitsolease to a , k f,,r 6pilthurt . Patent Antiscorbutic Drops, with the Eing'sdisty printed i,.(431 itibilel ink, in bottles of sa. 6d. double hot.les 10s. and Later XI included. Compound assume to. Dispensary, 15, Soho-square. London. ------", HIGH WATER. AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-AIoRKOW• Morning... Afternoon 4B nvnutt b ai.ef, __--......""a LONDON Printed and published by Leer I. E at the : 0 A. Orsics, N. 1 ,Carerstrev, sal at the tAce, Tan& Iler* ~r