Star. — London, England, 1816-06-06 00:00:00

- • • • -• . • ';.. ' t _ . • . .• . ~•1 _ orte of the patty at. that place:uias all Oded to, And that an elopement. had occurred.. But all obscurity Was *OM after removed—a key was shortly presented •by .witith all . the paragraphs could be dearly made .'Mir:' Ott th e 12th .If.J.tottisty,:aparagraph appeased Miiising Herald, • vehich'explained .all that pre ; (Wed it It set forSll7llt.te ti4— r —• of tk---" •:(4d . was stated itt-the Aluelsiation to mean the Mar quis of ..A betcorn, and it was ; Admittad by the Defen dants) 4‘. though cattirsedin'tbc.4oklap ipt i luxury, l 'staid to he thr it,grylp-ettNrOblelli‘Sit kn.the of she Britieh•Pteetvge. l l r In thii .paragraph .fiar4y !was-printedin ;end separated from Pie..sylla7 ble est, by . I(hypbeil. Could soy man doubt : lihat -Wax meant by this? ',could it 'be supposed, that the, flartly:est was. not iniettedjri this manner, for the porpose.of pointittO out ..ibdiasarties in the elopement mentioned it fia preceding, paragraph, which was .threw other el,vernents into temporary oblivion '?'!.. 7 r Afterthe prison had.- bees completely, prepared; no .time.*as bit in stating against whom it, was directed. j[ wars state.i..on.the,xecord, and admitted to be the. facti.that this paragraph alluded to Lady Hardy and the Marquis of Attercorn. Had it been denied, lie7wooldlave called several Noble Persons, who, frinn circumstances connected with the two families, would. be. able. to declare their firm.belief, - that Lady • itri~cly,asid the Marquisof Abercorn were the per loisiipoihted at. . He should hem thought that the. Editarainight have been satisfied when theY had, 1461i . ahed a paragraph like this, which* imputed such snMinaltondutt to these two persons. BOt they wete On the ifitli of January the following paragraph a.Pilcarett.in Tie Morising Herald : " A Noble L'Ord, who, to the course of a 60 years life, has sinned, eon amore, sufficiently, at least, for meihotlistlcal wpm tines, is chid to have applied for consolation to a faith devoted Bishop, trusting, that, .under-the plenary indulgence which cha- , radterises that pious Prelate, he may receive full absolutiou,.l without the common-place plea of :sod work." • •Witii the Malignity, of the latter part of this para. graph, he had, to-day,' nothing t: do. But he begged leave to state; .that it'alluded to a Reverend Pratte, 'the presenr Bishop of London, who was, of all men, the least 'Veit t.) the infamous observation, 44 that be . Would give gbsolution without exacting the common placf ileaVf•good works."—This was followed by a vost insulting paragraph— "the'Lady, said The' Afirniret Herald, " 'cholas taken so ikaltswable 'a trip, wide , her hoary paramour,, o the Paphian . ine has l but jest towed her issol year, was universally ad pysiredfor her beauty ant? accomplishments, and; till this unfor tunate siep, was held 'ifs hip esantauen also for her domestic • • to 4.! There was not a' word of truth in this paragraph, except what related i to the age, to the beauty, and to the virtues, olthisinjtirec! Lady. Could wickedness, be would ask, go farther than this ? .. This Lady was first held up to the public as having done that which cancelled all her previous good qualities, and then she was to be insulted by the recollection of 1.. r kn itter virtues. Yes, she was to be insulted with ti.e re collection of her fall Itom a state of-innocence to on: pf vice (and GOD k;10 WS ii would be a dreadful fall) under the mask of lauientin over her deviation from the path of honour.. this unfortunate seep," said the Defendants, wslie was held iii. high estima tion for her domestic virtues." .1-Ie had not language adequately to express his indignation at this para graph—this canting, hypocritical lanientation—sent forth at the moment when its. author well knew, that the virtue of Lordy -Hardy was as pure and as unsul. • 'lied as when she first. came into the world. This was the case he had. to lay before the Jury. He Might state other paragraphs, but he conceived, that :those which he had read contained slander enough to satisfy any Jury.. This was a case that called for large damages—it was a case bonded in entire, un• . mixed, and perfect falsehood. .The Plaintiffs were • living together at the present moment—and he would tall a gallant officer, wno knew them before their marriage, who would state, that they lived on terms • of . perfect affection, and' that there was not the slightest pretence for the scandalous assertions which ' had been promulgated.. This being proved, it would be for the Jury to consider *hat damages should be given in such a case. if he represented only an ordi nary individual;—if he did not represent one who he .thoughthad some claim on the country—whose life was Spent in protecting our laws—(and GOD forbid that, on his return t.. his native soil, he should not be sup ported by those laws which he had so laboured to protect !)—it he had not to represent a person of the Most exalted worth—even in that case, what damages • could be considered too large to be awarded against the Defendants, who stood before the Court as the author, of Loose malignant paragraphs? For, he con tended,. they did so stand before the Court. Let them bring forward the author--let his Clients have a tangi . ble palm against whom they could proceed, and they Would stop here. But, Utile Defendants would not do that; they mufit be considered as the authors of theca lumny4.and. they: must take the consequence. He was convinced, that he would not have an opportunity of addressing the ; Jury. ,a second time.. His Learned Friend was .too discreet to Call sses, yet wit ' tresses were subpcenatd. Neavhini sat his Hon. Filend,....the: father of ibis , injured Lady. But :be ("ionid not be called. What, then, was he brought here for. To be insulted—not by his Learned • Friend, who had not advised him to be subpeenatd. GOD knows by whom he was brought into Court—but be was certain that he , would not be called as nwit ness. • His . Leatned Friend would make an excellent speech,. but be- would not produce any evidence. What defence could his Learned Friend offer ? and,, 116 was sure, if any defence existed he would find it out. Would he say that those libels were copied from other papers ? He defied his Learned Friend to she w that. But even that would be no excuse. It ;a not sufficient for the Editor of a Newspaper to say t ., a person whom lie had injured in his publication, , 6 0, I saw that paragraph, in another paper, and • copiedlt," The person aggrieved was not bound to •'trace the.injuhr iti its iource. It was for the .Edi , ter to be scrupulously nice in examining what he ad mitted-. into his paper. Let him adhere to th..t • rule, and he •might proceed safely but, if he did -spot, the libeity '0 the press, instead of being a blessing, would become a. curse, unless lie was ren dered civilly criminally answerable for every libel in his paper. He was quite sure that no such ;paragraphs could be found in any other Newspaper. • .He , would state why he threw out this chal lenge—because Idortaing Herald Was not the ' paper he should. have selected for attack, if he • could hare found the obnoxious paragraphs elsewhere. • When hi /b b the* in the litiakkii. enteOdtkea btl sinct that in other prints, but there was no: vestige of them. He was therefore driven •to bring his action -against that Paper. Perhaps . his Learned Friend would indulge in the common observation which was usually offered on. these occasions—that as the partiei were living together with unblemished character—the husband an honourable man, the wife a virtuous wo man ;. they therefore odd not suffer from the libel. Certainly' a good name settiom , tmfferedsr slander ; but Goriffirbid that. that *Mold be considered a de fence •ef the'i slanderer ! 'Every newsOper writer who chose (8 adMinister to the taste for calumny. which. Was said to exist in this country, and it was a meet onnattral taste, first created by those persons who now tdok care to feed it, Would escape with impunity if such it doctrine were tolerated. But this argument could not be pressed on the Jury ; it could not' be stared; that the characters of those who Were thus maligned slid not suffer. He would state boldly, that Sir Thomas and Lady Hardy could not suffer by this slander in - the estimation of those who knee, thenf; but there were thousands'and millions of per sons inithil great country who did not know them, and they might believe the calumny. Was it to be allbWed that this amiable Lady should, day after day, be'actused with the commission of the worst of crimes ? Here a double adultery was alleged. A married lady was stated to have left her husband, for the purpose of living with•another married man,. who was represented as hoary with age. The plain tiffs had besides three • children. Was it no injury to persons thus circumstanced, that the mother of these; children had it, circulated throughout the three king doms that she was guilty of a dreadful crime ? Was it no injury that this report, some time or other,! would reach the ears of those children ? On another ground he conceived large damages ought to be Liven: How were the Jury to state to the world their idea of the character of Lady Hardy? How were they to secure to the plaintiff., that for which they came into Court, a toll reparation of character ? How were they to state their belief that this charge was un founded ? There was but one language by which they could speak their sentiments on th►i occasion, and that was by the damages they gave ? If the Jury were persuaded to give small damages, would it not be ruinous to the character of Sir Thomas Hardy and his wife ? Would not the world natu• rally say, the man who had those claims on you for damages would not have gone out of Court with such a trifie,unless there was some ground for the accusation? The only way, therefore, in which . the Jury could satisfy Lady Hardy, the only way to set her at ease with herself, was to speak in the language of da mages, and thus to express their belief, on oath, that the libel was as false as it was wicked. He should merely call One witness to prove the state and condi tion of life of the plaintiffs. This being done, he would leave them and their character in the hands of the Jury.. Admiral Sir John Beresford was then examined by Mr. Serpent Ben.. He stated that be had been acquainted with Sir Thomas and Lady Hardy ever since their marriage. Sir Thomas was a Captain. in the Navy ; Lady Hardy was Ole daughter at Admi ral Berkely, and niece of the Duke of Richmond ;---• her Ladyship had three female children. Witness is a . Rear-Admiral, lie was in the habit of seeing Sir Thomas and Lady Hardy frequently. Nn man wag fonder of his wife than Sir. Thomas ; and up to the moment the witness was speaking, he believed there was no Lady living more virtuous than Ladyllardy. (Cross-examined by Mr. SEILISANT Cdt , LRY.) He had seen one of the paragraphs, and thought it alluded to Lady Hardy and the Marquis of Aber corn. He had not read the paragraph previously in any other paper. Mr. Serjeant COPLEY, for the defendants, began by observing, that he rose with considerable anxiety to address the Jury upon this subject. It was an anxiety not referable to himself, but to the important stake of the defendant which depended upon their verdict. He felt a weight of anxiety pressing upon him, from the eloquence 'which his Learned Friend had employed instating the.case for the plaintiffs.— Hqwever, he was sure the Jury would dismiss every thing from their minds which did not fairly belong to the question. There were certainly many points, upon which he entirely agreed with his Learned Friend, in the address which he had just made to them. The talents,• bravery, and eminent services of the first plaintiff, he admitted to be equal to the most elaborate eulogium which it was possible to pronounce ; and if he could borrow the eloquence of his Learned Friend, he would obey the impulse of his feelings, and follow, or endeavour to surpass him in paying the just tribute of praise to the exalted character of that gallant Officer. Such was the lan guage, and such were the sentiments, which he was instructed to declare on behalf of his clients, for in admiration of the splendid professional career of Sir Thomas Hardy, they stood second to .none, who knew how to appreciate. services like those. which he had performed, He then went on to observe, that a tull.mcl unequivocal declaration was offered mi,the ;un i t f, the defendants, that, there was ,, not the least!' foundation for the" slander . • which they. bad hew the: unfortunate means of disseminating. Ho,would-asks: was it the object of the gallant.pfaintig to °Whin. money by,.this prosecution ? It wou)4 . loe.doinc.fire rankest injustice to his chew preppie to. pree it.... could, point out with . the . greatest precision .wh.a:, ,in all Oubability„ pass between Sir Tkomits- Hardy and his Comisel in.the cOnferenee' upon this • snbjeet.. He knew he, would say, here is affecting the,peace of my family too deeply .to be p:ls!:ee. over ; ,what must be don e ?* My Learned' Friend would answer, an enquiry mast take placeSi we must ascertain what ia, the foundation : of, these : reports, and whence they originated. With this vino these proceedings had been instituted,m w ipe , off the imputation which had been cast upon a mostvirtucluet and excellent Lady. , lie could assure thelury, that: the first moment his clieritifjcnevi of ,any paragraph" appearing in the Papkr• Of; ad eXceptinnabk . - kind ‘4loc that in which th 4 stifepoipt4l Oft(4`the profit sicinal adviser, of tlie`Vintiffs, then ltiw had been the utririst,' xtety ofteeleyelf Ond bf• apology which. &tick bi Oquired,"(o :mite the fullest retractions, anti' •islOr hi:the:that pitibpt and sin.: sere acknowledgemedt of • the error into which they had inadvertently fallen could do it, to atont.for the temporary injury 'which had been committed on their responsibility. Did he say, then, that the plaintiff Iliad done wriostia bringing this caust to its present • - • 4il_ iiiiti...beeettee the retort of MAO W si: j o i rt th s e p l 4•Of ) rat, in 'bi tbill cinu Co l u at r e t d w th o r u o l u d ih in the a t v h e r r e y. e kingdoms, .and the spOiless purity of Lady Hardi would be attested, and gladly declared by those who had, appeared before the'world to question it not really, as he had before stated, bin ostensibly so. — Every thiiig that could possibly be done to satisfy the injured feelings'a ,the parties had been done. — His cliehis aCknowledged their liability ; they proved this by,the coarse they haire pursued. They made their declaration throigh him, that there was not the slightest foundation for the libel . They said, that after . inquiry they hadfounitthat the Lady was pure, spotless, and adorned with . ..every domestic virtue.— Thecoasequencet of an attack upon such exalted worth must fall upon . theinselves.. This they admitted. though at the same tripe averring, that their offence was the offence of inadjertency. Every part of the libel was admitted to be false; and every thing bud been now done which could be done by this idqutry.jpi The purpose of it was aosweted, and the reputation of the injured and excellent-laady - 'was repaired by the hand which had tinconscitsly given the wound, and her character would again go fbrth to the'world as pure and unblemished as ever. He would not say that his Leatned Friend:ought td stop here, be and the plaintiff • were botind to go, farther ; th ey were bound to go to the veidict. to prevent a suspicion of collusion between the parties. He would again ad mit to the Jury, that his clients were 'certainly re sponsible in law, but not for any malice contained in the paragraphs, for they did not write them. He would suppose a case, to put this in a stronger point of view : he would *suppose a person, having some deep rooted enmitylo the plaintiffs, who should take this mode of glutting his vengeance. But was this the case with the defendants ? No, they knew nothing whatever of the plaintiffs, and were merely the casual instruments of a publication which they would be as ready to reprobate and condemn, where the intention to inflict pain was obvious, as his Lear nedliFf4ind;or arty one who heard him. But his Lear ned Friend had told them, that there was a series of paragraphs,*and thence inferred, that the defendants must be apprised . of them. He, however, would tell the Jury that his clients knew nothing about them, till they were brought under their view, for the pur poses of the present proceeding. Neither of them had any share in selecting what should be published. The paper was got up in a great hurry, in the night, under the care of the EditoTr, and, from the great va . . . . _ riety of matter of which it was composed, it 'was easy to suppose, that articles might slip in, which would have been re had more time been allowed for deliberation. He should not resort to the argu ment, that the reputation 'of the plaintiff was not in jured by this attack, thought they had been taught to expect it of him by his Learned Friend. Did his Learned Friend suppose,.:tha; Sir Thomas Hardy wanted a large, award of damages, to.prove the false ' hood of the imputations Upon his. Lady's honour ?-.-; He was quite sure he did not. 'netb . seas one oda*. point, which required ',some .notice;" apd then he should conclude :—They hid been fold;that a highly respectable individual }lifd been brought there; for the purpose of having his eeelings harrawed up, by witnessing the proceedings . . in this case, He• Was quite sure, that excellent person would. not suffer in• his teeliogc, by witnoccing a proceeding tendiniCop every side to establish the purity of 'One so near to him. He must be satisfied With' the manner in which the. cause had been conducled. He courd ndi:Jeave. that place with any degree. of inquietaide ; he must depart with emotions of pleasure,. at.the unreserved admissions which had been made' to tlft:character of the plaintiff. Before he sat - cloviti,L Ire - would once More entreat them not to submit their judgments to the influence of his Learned Friend's eloquence-.-to direct their minds to the impartial: consideration of every fact which ought fairly to weigh with them in fixing their verdict, and then lte .should await their decision with the fullest confidence-that his client would not be punished for a maligbity-Which he never telt, and for a crime, whre.puly anzrbr was com mitted. Mr. BIRCUALL, the : Under Sheriff, then delivered a charge to the Jury, who, after a short consideration, assessed the damages at ,Q1(H)0. • I OLD /MILEY. Yesterday Saisud :la.th. was indicted -for feloniously uttering a Ss. token, made with intent to resemble the tokens issued by the Governor and Compafiy of the Bank of Ehgland,,knowing the same to be ccunter feit, he having been before convicted as a common utterer of counterfeit tokens. On the 3d of May the prisoner entered the Rose and Crown - public.l;ouse, Pitillico, about eight o'clock in the evening, and had a pint of porter ; he requested the landlady to clobitn a favour,• to which she. saidoell me what it is first ? ht slid, he wanted tditite **child three shillings; ind Would she give him!' klifee..shilling piece Or 'Mall silver ? She save .141141 env,. and.he, gave her two shillings and tao-sispenceii all of which were good : hesvent out, but shortlyreturnede and:said to Lydia, Hose, the landlady; is /. would thank you to change,. 'Ate . three shilling tiece; as tt . is * bad one,": but she, ;well knowidg , it sva.slnat ;the One.sbe gay.e.liirn,...tir • ibat had the mark:of a hall- moon ....ttpan it, : said he *as " a - rascal for saying that was the. one, -und had %goad mind to, kridcir,him down. wi . th,tbe poker . ;" imrgediatteti , ssiize.d . littegood,token; Witich: she Saw imus in' his 'other-hand, add said he should : Wire_ neither till he Bad - bettijbefOrel the Magistrate ;: r: . 'the prisoner then pulled.off Kitt 'coat, and was going ; ,aut, when the Landlord interelVto whoin the prlso. 'ner said•he wouidgive !satisfaction where lie got the. •tokens, and went Out :without-his coat, although it 'rinsed very fast ; when thk - Landiqrd hid gothis hat die found the prisoner had gonetrom the house a con 's'iderable distance,. and wps walknig very quick; he overtook him,..and ...walkedvaith. hint, when the pri• .sorter three several ilitnesi7 endeavoured .to get away, but at last was secured.—Gaiity. ; JAN Dreirraged 17.,• wasiadicted for • assaulting al . /Albans Stephens- on the:thighway, putting him in learcand taking , from his person two•gold seals and . key, his progeny.: • The ptofooseur deposed ithitOo ens. SSd of Apriliast, when passing through Air-streeti: Bethnal-green; he was. overtaken by a udg wormany who said to him, - 4 ' Beware—there, arefour men behind, who are about to rob you."— The prosecutor instantly quickened his pace, and crossed the street. The prisoner, however, came up wieh and passed him. In a minute he again turned round and rushed violently opon.hint s =mit hint vius '4ently under the chin, and made a pull at E s sv i te The ribbon, however, to which hi s seals 4,„1: ded separated, and lie ran off with the Lit t er --Death. The prosecutor rt'coti,mended rnirt? tr on account of his youth. caused mud' ihteit:he:": Elizabeth Edward, stood indictesdn.llodr ,stt;eaculiiiniltil:il Bank notes, the property of James Diane. - t " The prosecutor was-a labouring lad, who i i ,d ra the day the notes were stolen, straw, for which he received ae3 H e went 41 ' 1.1 Red Lion public-house, Whilechl I i i.e., to .iaveA'at'e of porter ; while drinking which. he 1441 his mo.: • upon the table ; the prisoner stee died it up; art r. 4 away ;he ran after, and did n lose sr - ,ht 4 ,1' '•• secured.—Guilty. s ,s , lit: (3 dence of the parties being s ; contradictory : flambeau ti', Charles Collier stood ch " .rged with assaeoila t i.,„, she T w he as fo se ll Walker, a servant to Lord Dedley, aed steali,..o his person a silver Immune watch, A phi t " .'" re!, a ., 1 two metal keys. Ors the 23J of March, p r . tem ytmecutor . si i wix was walking up the. Haymaiket irons the . o pt ,; door„to seek for his master's carriage, six men Standing ; he had a flambeau in hi, t un : the prisoner, who was one of the six, vi it meek the arm of the proseCutor, iso that the and at the Same moment his watch was drawn & R . his pocket on the rigliz !laid side; that.he saw. the man with liiewatch ant!, : , ann ie d i4 e7Y said bola: of, him, but the rist.tter acid ";,i btr dragged him away by the tail of his coat; p res „,n l ,, r cally-d a t' Stop thief!" but uo one came; the pe so .,,, r then said with an oath, 4. You °lir •o 1.4 c c't•4 4 . watch;!' ,the prosecutor then canglif to hi of Ve-- K . swirl', and said lie was the, cause of ;t• herb, , 4 „ kE , the latter said he had iv:tiling to 0 . , With it , i t t would give him the number of his c'i ich if he lad it (for it appeared he was a IlaCklity COACIIOLIIII; Humphreys and another Offic,r then came u p, „,. soon secured the prisoner. Humphreys corroborated the latter part of thee.. dence of Walker, as he heard it, having come ge l . upon them, as did the other Offi'er also. On the part of the prisoner, two witnesses, both hackney coachmen, were examined, the first of wh et was James Walker, a :loft man in a brown coat, who swore, that on the night of the robbery he w is walk. ing with the prisoner, and talking with him ablut a fight ; he did not strike any one on the arm; a toot. man came running up, hut did not speak a word; it the same time, there was a cry about a man glee under a coach ; the prisoner swore to the footman, that he deserved to lose his watch, if he could tri keep it ; upon which he accused the prisoner. a crowd soon collected round, and witness walked 'off and bought some nuts ; he heard the roe:cane say that it was a short man in a brown cost that had taken lfs ,watch. Tnis witness farther Laid, tli)t the pvisecer's coach Was near the kirb-stone ; while the officers and prosecutor swore that it was in the middle of the road. The other hackney coachman swore the pri. sonef was, not near ' ?he prosecutor, for he MC the • .wti ele bus : h:less.: .. Atteillip RecOnalt had addressed the Jury, they ielii.ed, for near is o hour's and a half, and then re. turned a yeriNct,OrNot Guilty. Theseltbrated lie . % . itirts King was brmis-h!!° the bar:charged will; fploroualy obtaining p:oreriyen. der false pretences. ; b .' ,Richard Jarhes deposed. that he lived at N. 15, Biihopsgate.street, and 'was a shoemaker ; the p r is e . her lodgid with him ; oh the' Ist of April she i'b. lemma. from .hini a hair 'of shees, under' th:? prri,ise I%li that -. Thomas'etisuld ply for them when h e came to triwn, whi;.:Wavould be' on the Monday followjng; on the Friday she :obtained two pair of shoes, and a pair of boots, under the same fare pretence. Mr. Serjeaet KWOWLYSfiere pus an end to the hid, by observing, that (here was not sufficient ecdence to convict the prisoner of felony, and althon't she may have used a false pretence, there was nothia: brought . ; forward to prove it ; tnerefore, uner th: deficiency of evidence, they !nest acquit the priwner. The Jury immediately found a vtrdict of—Not Guilty. The -0-isoner, upon her entering the dock, appeared to be much affected, and called tor a chair and a smelling b.ittle, both of which requests were ine,ue -diately complied with. The remark et th? Ceeel SLIIJEANT to the Jury, however, seemed to riot n the recovery of the prisoner, as the smelling hot::: immediately disappeared, and the handl:creme' wa instantly put into her pocket. PRICE OF s'rocKs 1' E6TEKDAY. Bank Stock 223 i 224 I Imp. Atm. 3 per Cent. Red. 631,- 634 I Omnium, '231 . 3 per Cent. Cons. ti4t4 I [mitt Bond. p:..r, 1 pre. 4 per Cent. 78t4 Exch. Bilk i di,. 4 pre. 5 per Cent. Navy 93 941 95 S Conso6 for Ace. 6..1;i Long Ann. 15 15-Lti Di Lot ay] ickett., X . :.1. 7s. Imp. 3 per Cent. BIR 1 :IS. At Tavira, in Portugal, the lady ut Colonel .lustin, Governor of the two Algarvee, of a daughter. At Danby Park, the lady of E.: Kendal, Esq. High Sheriff of Breronshire, of a son. • Saturday, at Haling Cottage, Croydon, Mrs. J. S. Wtastaelii, of a son. u 'Sunday, at her house in Great George•street, the LAI Goulkurn, Esq. M.P. of .t sun. Mdtua, neat Gravesend, the I.adj of CApt.Sirrett;of awe. MARR On Monday tut, - at St . . James's Church, I.leutenintllarro . port, 89th Regiment, to Henrietta, daughter of the Itv: Gro4= +7etiltina, and niece to the late LiLuteuala-General Sir i4u0.2 1 *Piero'', K C B. .% '1 hurstlay, at Eastbourn, Lieut -Colonel Golc*lch, Royal le .gineers, to Cathea ine Eliza, younpst daughter the late Nti. J. Thornaf , En. of Cobb Court, S111?(.X. M arch 6, at Cur.:coa, Capt.'fi:l.ucas, R.I).N. to Mice Lre: .4 Elizabeth, only daughter of Michael I.e Maiwn, Lbg. freake of the Court of Justice cf that island. 'Thursday, ir. Dublin, the Rev. George Brittainr, to Arr. Marla, fourth daughter of the late Lient.-Colorel _ bIEW. On Sunday morning, th.r. 2tl inst:.nt, Mr!. Valpy, wife of fa Rev. Di .VAlry, of Reading. . Satitalay selanight, at her house in Leices.er-wart, A.'" 78th year of her age, 11Irs.Pryee, the oldest au4 ply of the V."' resrectable inhabitants of that place. May 23, at the Cove of Cork, Sir Feritini Dounden castle,County Kildare. May 16, Samuel Arthur, infant son of Draiefacknightagditikltri May 26, Mary Anne, daughter of the latc, 444. 111- :sister of Kinfauos . May 27, Mr. James 11(140,:deaeon 'of the kmannermeg, OS' gow. 11,4' death -was in cosieVileihos eta fall from a gig OilL 6 preceding Moodily. • t ..! _• . 0 v.1!7 111 -61 4-1 WATER TO MORS.RAY AT LONDON BR Morning -• • Nifitz atter ) 1. Af ter noon - . o ..... I.ONDOINI: -Printed by I.evst. Kalil . , Pickett Inacti rubilikttl there and at ilte Slii-016cejetnee bun Ni r O, De All IC 'l' 6 3 et t o 9