Star. — London, England, 1819-02-13 00:00:00

t a' % LAIV INTELLIGENCE. LENT ASSIZES.-MIDLAND CIRCUIT. =NODS SID ILOSSIST DALLAS, [NT. AND SID JAXIS scasouGn, ENT. Noneumgrroxinuaa—Saturday, February 27, at Northamptoc Run...un--Friday, March 5, at Okeham. I.I34COLNSIIIIIE—Saturday, March it, at the Cantle of Lincoln. ..—ne day, at the City of Lincoln. __ _ Orr or Norrprocamsitiaz—Friday, March 12, at Nottingham. Toi►r or NoTrixonalc—game day, at the Town of Nottingham. Dvawrinnau—Wednesday, March 17, at Derby. LucicsrEasutat--Baturday, March 20, at Leicester Castle. Boaouckt or Locarraa—Same day, at the Borough of Leicester. CITY or Covxmvar—Friday, March 26, at the City of Coventry. Waawiccaulaz—Saturday, March 27, at. Warwick. COURT OF CHANCERY, FEBRUARY 12. OI'ERA HOUSE. WATERS V. TAYLOR. Mr. ROUPELL asked, if it would be convenient to his Lordship that Counsel should now proceed on this long-litigated case? He was induced to make that request from the circumstance of the Court having, on a former day, ordered it to stand for hearing as tkis day. Mr. HART stated, that he could have no objection to the case being proceeded in ; but he submitted to his Lordship, whether it would be proper now to go on with it, as it was generally understood that mo tions of course were to have preference to every thing else. It was impossible for any man to say what time the Opera House might occupy, if it was now at once to he entered upon. The LORD CH AxcELLott ordered it to stand ever till all the motions of course were heard; because he knew, from frequent experience, that if the Opera House were once to come on there would be an end of all other business for the day. The case was not gone into when the Court rose, at three o'clock. DRURY-LANE THEATRE. COOKE V. GI.OSSOP AND TIIE DRUItY-LANE COMPANY. 'I he Souctron-GKNEnm, moved, on the part of the plaintiff, for a similar injunction to that which wni granted on a former day, in another case where the Drury-lane Company was also concerned. The injunction which he sought for was, to restrain the defendant (Glossop) from proceeding in an action which had been commenced, and to restrain him from commencing any other action. lie believed Sir Ar thur Piggott, who was on the other side, had no ob jection to the motion. The object of the motion was, to clefimt the priority of certain creditors; and it was necessary that it should be granted, unless a com promise was agreed upon between the parties. As, . however, the fiction stood for trial, he hoped the pre sent motion would be zranted. The Loup Cu.% NC ICI.LOR intimated his assent. The Soi.ici ron-GENEnAr...—" I will take it, then, until further order." lY TIIE MATTER OF RMANT, DUFFIELD r. STEWART, The Lotto Ctt scio.r,om, on coming into Court this morging, said, as Mr. Duffield was not a party to Mr. Brynnt's petition to supersede the commission of bankrupt awarded against him, he could not, on that account, grant the injunction asked for; and in timated, that any person who should buy the Reygate Estates, under the existing circumstances, would be . k hold man indeed ; and recommended Mr. Bryant to give due notice of the objections at the time of sale, if he did not, on better information, in the mean time grant the injunction. 1'111: SEVENTH LIST OF BANK Hurt COMMISSIONERS V. ALEXANDER BRUCE. Mr. Bruce again presented himself to-day before the Court, and was about to submit a motion to his Lordship, for having the proceedings under this commission taken out of the hands of the Solicitor to the Commission (Mr. Carter), conformably to his Lordship's directions of yesterday. The LORD CnANCELLOR said he could heir nothing of this kind upon motion, unless a petition, stating the object of the motion, were previously filed. He would hear from Mr. Bruce upon what grounds he intended to present the petition. Mr. Bruce bowed, and went on to state, that his petition. would pray of the Court to allow of certain papers being taken out of the hands of Mr. Carter, Solicitor to the Assignees. He proceeded to corn ment with much warmth upon the conduct of that Gentleman, and alluded to two bills of indictment, which, he said, had been found. The LORD CHANCELLOR.—" I sit here, Sir, bound to protect the characters of other men as well as my own; and if this matter is not before me in a proper shape, I am not doing my duty unless I restrain you from making these observations." Mr. Bntce continued, after having bowed three or four times to the Court, and represented the hardship of his case. _ The Logo CHANCELLOR You have a tight to present your petition, and I will read it with due at tention; but be it recollc:ted, that I am answerable to GOD, my conscience, and to the public, that no man shall be prejudiced in this Court by ex park statements. With respect to the indictments you speak of, I have not until this moment heard of them; but I say, in the language of my Lord Thurlow— , Accusation is no proof that a party is justly accused.' I will not consent to be the instrument of doing in justice to any man. it is my duty to say, that if I had not thought it unpardonable to interrupt public business, I should have told you, that I have beard from you language which no Judge ought to permit, as applied to any matter whatever." Mr. Bruce bowed and retired. MORO 1 9 . DE LA TORRE. This case is one which has occupied much of the time of the Court in arguing. Three different mo- tions had been made, and the case only remained for the )udgment of his Lordship. 'the LORI) CII ANCEL con now gave judgment. Witli respect to the first motion, which regarded the sum of j:38,000, his opinion was, that it might be car ried over to account without prejudice. With re gard to the payment of the dividends, which was the subject of the second motion, he considered that,' as to the order pronounced, there was nothing in that order :which interfered with giving the notice to the Bank t and after the Bank had received that notice, it was not in its power to pay the dividends to a n y o f the parties. As to the third, and most important :notice, it appeared w him the only. point to be con sidered was, whether he could take off from the three esecutors the restraint which had been imposed as to suypart of the fund of 484,000. As to a very la rge portion of it, he waritilly convinced that he could not take off the restraint; but he would, before the, next Seal, endeavour to ascertain upon what part of the fund, if any, the restraint could be taken off. In the present state of the cause, he could not direct any issue as to the £84,000. COURT OF ICING% BENCH, FEBRUARY Is. • JOHNSON D. GLOSS. Mr. GURNEY sheaved cause against a rule obtained by Mr. SCARLETT, to stay proceedings upon an un dertaking given by the defendant, on his paying the sum of £lO4. It appeared that an Innkeeper in the county of Surrey, named Cooke, had been made a bankrupt, and the Commissioners permitted him to remain in the Inn, to manage the business. He went on contracting debts, and the plaintiff being . a credi tor, obtained judgment and execution against him. He was proceeding to sell the goods, when the defen dant, who is an Auctioneer, came down, sent by the Assignees, to sell the property for the creditors. The plaintiff's Attorney would only give the goods up on receiving an undertaking from 'the defendant, in which he consented to pay not only the plaintiff's debts, but all the costs. He subsequently refused to abide by the undertaking, on the ground that he had been imposed on. The defendant offered to pay the debt, amounting to £lO4, but it was contended he ought not to pay costs. Mr. Gurney argued that no advantage had been taken, and that the action brought on the undertaking ought to proceed. After Mr. SCARLETT had been heard in support of the rule, the Court made it absolute, observing, that the plaintiff would be extremely well off if he re ceived the £lO4. An Attorney, who had continued an action against a defendant, after he knew the plaintiff was dead, waj ordered by the Court to pay the costs. Several writs of Mandamus, directed to Corpora tion Officers, were discussed and disposed of. This being the last day of Term, the Court sat to a late hour. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FEBRUARY ID )LE V. THE ROYAL EXCHANGE A4SURANCE COMPA%Y. On the '2Bth of last month, Mr. Serjeant LENS moved for a Rule to shew cause why a new trial should not be granted in this case, which was an action of covenant on a policy of insurance by the Royal Exchange Company, for the sum of 1.4,500 on the ship Ajax. On the lath of November, 1810, the ship Ajax, bound from Quebec for London, in going down the river St. Lawrence, struck and sprung a leak. In consequence of the injury which she sustained on that occasion, the Captain, with the consent of one of the owners, thought it advisable to sell the cargo. When the cause was tried whether the Captain had a right to dispose of the cargo, the Jury found that the mas ter had acted throughout the whole transaction, bona fide, for the benefit of the parties concerned. The 'Special Jury's verdict stated that, contrary to all ex pectation, the vessel having been sold and brought to Quebec, was repaired for £1.56, and sailed with a new cargo for London the next summer. The two objections to the plaintiff's right to recover were, Ist, That there was no authority to affect the freight ; 2dly, That even if the• circumstances in which the vessel was placed, did amount to a total loss, these should have been duo notice given of it. - The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, in delivering the judg. ment of the Court, observed, that after giving all the attention which was requisite to the cases referred to by the Learned Counsel, who, on a former day,' had so ably argued this cause, and also after refer. ring to other cases which seemed likely to influence the judgment of the Court •in this cause, its judg ment should after all be, in a great measure, deter• mined by the particular facts before the Court. His Lordship then noticed various cases from which h was on the entire to be concluded, that the right to sell may, by possibility of circumstances, exist in the Captain of a ship acting solely on his own authority. In answer to the inquiry whether the owner, who in this ease was present at the sale, had a right to sell without consent of the insurers, his Lordship ob served, that if, on a broad question, circumstances justify the selling, he did not think it important whe ther the owner or Captain sells. In the case of " Mills v. Fletcher," Lord Mansfield told the Jury, that if they thought the Captain sold for the benefit of the party concerned, they ought to find a verdict for to tal loss. As to the distinction which, in the present case, had been started on the words" with a view to," and " for" the benefit of the owners, his Lordship thought that it was a distinction without a difference. What had been said concerning the Underwriters' exclusive title to the risk, appeared also fallacious. In the case of " blacartney v. Able," Lord Ellen borough held, that the freight was lost to the In surers ; this decision applied to the present case, in which the freight was in the greatest peril. In the case of " Anderson v. Watts," the ship bound from London to Quebec was, from stress of weather, so damagason, bicaued, as to prevent her from going to Quebec that sese, in the month of November, the ice blocks up the River St. Lawrence. In that case , 1 the Court held that the voyage was only r et ar d e d, land that, therefore, the freight should not have been sold. The circumstances of that case. however, were in direct opposition to the present one, except in the conclusion of Lord EllenborouBh, which applied in favour of the verdict given in this.— As, therefore, the cases cited for the defendant in the present cause either failed or told against him, bis Lordship was of opinion, that the case of " Mills and Fletcher" should determine the one now before the, Court. It would not therefore be requisite to dis turb the Judgment of the Court for the plaintiffs. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, FEBRUARY 12. SIR WATKIN LEWES V. JOHN HORGAN. Sir W. OwEs moved the Court on the part of Sir Watkin Lewes, that all the, papers in this cause, in the hands of Messrs. Routledge and Hardy, the late Solicitors of Sir Watkin Lewes, might be delivered up, as it was-impossible for Sir Watkin to put in his answer to the interrogatories exhibited by - John Mor gan, and prayed for further time till the papers were produced, to enable him to put in the said smewer. This motion was made upon the affidavit of Sir Watkin Lewes and Sir John Peshell, who stated, that repeated applications had been made to Mears. Roudedge and Hardy for the papers, but which they refused to give up, upon the ground that their costs were not paid. The affidavit states that Sir Watkin Lewes pet the_cpwstion to Mr. Rnisdedge, when he =CI with him, if it would be con es to Mr. ge to advance the fees .09a,rieres So Court*, lit usual for all iespictabl* 4 tik 41 4 Mr. flaudedge replied it ...big glected the business, and called on Sir Watkin Lewes to pay every fee necessary in this cause; and Sir Watkin Lewis being kept out of the possession of his estates, and large sums of money due to him, was not capable to advance any further moneys to his Solicitors, in consequence of which Messrs. Rout ledge and Hardy have withheld the papers. Sir Watkin Lewes stated to the Court, that the Lord Chancellor had lately decided a case of a simi lar nature—Ross against Laughian, 1 Vary and Beams, 349, that a client was not to be injured by the Solicitor detaining the papers in his possession.— Sir Watkin Lewes also prayed that all affidavits in this cause might be filed. Baron GRAHAM said he was sorry for the afflic tions of Sir Watkin Lewes, but could not, with any propriety, in this stage o f the business, grant any further time. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, FEB. it. ALLIRBY V. MORGAN. Thomas Morgan, Esq. was opposed by Mr. Pox.- LOCK, for obtaining goods to the amount of £278, under false pretences, from Mr. William Allerby. The insolvent was described in his schedule as Thomas Morgan, late of Archangel, in Russia, mer chant. Mr. PoLLocc now contended, that this de scription was not sufficient to bring the case before the Court, but the objection was over-ruled. On examination, the insolvent said, he was a Russia merchant, and had been arrested in London in 1815. His letters were stopped at the Post-Office, and he was deprived of all his books and papers. His bro ther, Mr. Charles 'Morgan, was a merchant, residing in Bishopsgate-street. There had been a running ac count between them for many years, to a considera ble amount, but at the time of his arrest, he did not know exactly how their accounts stood. He drew a bill to the above ariount upon his brother, in favour of Mr. Allerby, which had not been honoured. Mr. Allerby now proved, that the insolvent, in 1815, ordered goods of him to the above amount, which were delivered in June the same year. He drew upon his brother, Mr. C. Morgan. Mr. Allerby at first contented himself with making an inquiry in the neighbourhood, and finding that Mr. C. Morgan was a respectable man, he had no hesitation in giving the insolvent the goods; but on application being made for the money, the payment was refused. Mr. Adam Hamblin, managing clerk to Mr. Al lerby, proved his having delivered the bill at the counting-house of Mr. C. Morgan ; he was at first requested to call.again, but the second time he was told that house had already advanced so much to Mr. T. Morgan, that they could not honour any more bills for him. Mr. Wm. Bell, clerk fo Mr. C. Morgan, said that gentleman was at the time in Russia, and he did not think proper to honour the bill, as he had nn instruc tions to that effect. He could not recollect the state of their.accounts at the time, but believed there was a balance in favour of Mr. C. Morgan, to the amount of 12‘2000. This was the alleged fraud, and the Court pronounced the Insolvent entitled to his dis charge, time hting no other opposition against him. f ~. ;~r :' - 1 POLIC E. Nisxstox-Horsr.—A TmEr...--Yesterday, a young mar, of most respectable appearance, was charged with stealing a gold seal from the shop of Mr. Hattun, of London fridge, on Thursday. The prisoner, a hen apprehended, was literally a Dandy in his dress, btrrhe had since metamorphosed himself, by changing his long and elegant cut coat, and concealing his" self erected patent shirt collar" beneath his accki•rchief.—The pri soner was fully committed to Newgate for trial. liow.sruzsr.—C7tories Tidsivell, a well-known character, was charged with being concerned with a most daring gang of rob bers in violently assaulting and endeavouring to rob William Taylor, in the employ of Mews. Stephen and Thomas Milian, of Goldsinlth-street, Cheapside, silk-mercers, of three pieces of silk, of the value of 4.60, about a quarter past five o'clock on Thursday afternoon, in Ifigh-otrect, St. Giles's. He was com mitted. llumphreys discovered two of the otheri in the after noon, and apprehended them. A poor hardened wretch, about 90 years of age, and an appren tice, was brought to the office on several chargrs of the moat brutal violence against his parents, of the most shocking attempts to seduce his younger brother to theft, and of actual theft com mitted by himself on his master. Ile was committed on the latter charge, to spare his parents the pain of prosecuting him. Maatamsoecu-srarrr.- -Four young sprigs of fashion, be longittg to Noble families, were charged with riot and disorder, in Cranbourne.alley, at two o'clock yesterday morning, and assaulting Pitcher, a watchman. They were taken to St Anne's watcbhouse and locked up all night, as they dared the night constable to do so.—ln defence, they acknowledged having been inspired by wine, but that they were first insulted in the street, and the watchman let the off - enders escape.—The Magistrate thought their punishment sufficient, and they were discharged. It is a very gratifying fact, as well with regard to the moral character of the Army and Navy as to the Police of the Metropolis, that notwithstanding the lamentable dep rav ity so muc h to b e deplored in many classes of life, and at very early ages, there has not been, since the discharge of so many ships and regiments, consequent to the peace, one convic tion for felony of any of those numerous ranks. At an early hour yesterday morning, some daring villains attempted to break into and rob the dwelling house of Collin Roberts, Esq. situated at the top of Pond -street, Hampstead. Supposing the whole of the family were at their town house, in Russell square, they got over a high wall in the rear of the house, crossed the garden, and got into the y ar d, and, with the assistan ce o f a ladder, they got in at a one pair back window ; the doors on each side being locked, they could proceed no further without open ; in g them ; the noise made awoke the maid -servants, who throwing up the sashes, cried out; « Murder!"— The villains supposing they were alone, commanded them to be silent, at the peril of their lives ; fortu nately the gardener happened to sleep in the house, who, on hearing the noise, made his appearance at another window, and on learning the cau s e of a l arm , he called -out, katch!" several times, which caused the watchman stationed at the end of the lane to spring his rattle, on which the villains made a pre cipitate retreat without effecting their purpose. SINGULAR Camtacrea.—Yesterday morning, was found dead, in ati Obscure lodging, in George-yard, Whitechapel, Jane Jones, more commonly known by the name of Crasy Jaw; well known for years about Rag-fair, Rosemary-lane, Thames -street, and Whitechapel. She used to be decorated wish arti fici4l Sowers round her head, with a large leek stuck in it, and half naked, without shoes or stockings. She had formerly been employed in supplying die men of war at Gosport.with various articles, where the formed a connection with one of the sailors who was hanged on board the GLORY, of 74. guns, at the time-of Use memorable mutiny at the Nen, some years ado, This unitaßpy end of her companion; it supposod, deprived her of nage, The following peals of Mut joining Issue Whereas appeal manner of proceeding sive ; and the ft - to be used ; and abolished ; Be it therefore jetty, by and with tual and Temporal, assembled, and after the offences, shall cease, shall not be lawful or sue appeal of - other person or felony, or other void, and abolished anywise norms=-• ' And be it further De tenant shall joined, por any depending, or which commenced; any 1 , withstanding. Ga.t.vmush rious Galvanic , of the murderer gow, with a plates. The results the rod from viously bent, lence as nearl, in vain attempted second experiment, nic nerve in • stantly commi belly was protruded and retiring di from the coin/ might have no supra-erbital in the murderer'. tion." The scene tators left the fainted from riment, the transmittil the spinal marrow • the fingers were agitation of the seemed to point whom thought to be of opinion, the blood-vessels been lacerated, stored to life! Tuesday night, out in the shop - Back-lane, St. ing the premises with the stock by the arrival of water. An Inquest at Uxbridge, his horse in a that effect. An Inquest lington-road, on vent) , years of 1 location from the caught fire in con candle while asleep. sir. BAG& Kent Sussex 5l 5. Essex Foreign PRICE o► St. James's Market. Clare Market Whitechapel Market. (per stone of Yellow &Sap, CumON; NEWGATE Aso Beef 3s •d Mutton 4s Od _ - Amsterdam Ditto at sight 1 Rotterdam—. 1 Antwerp, ex-mo 1 Hamburg!, 3 Altona 33 Paris, 3 day's date 23 Ditto 0 4 Bourdeaux do. 24 Frankfort Maine 140 Madrid, effective 391 Cadiz effect. 4O Barcelona 3B Gilboa, effective 381 Pith Poringal Gold Foreign _Gold 1 New Dollars. , CO. Ships at Market. 52 Newcastle 2e Sunderland Vass: we, Feb.. Bariey, per quarter, 58s to 711s—Peas, ' Nowsuar Balms, 56s to 67.20at5• to 82a.--Bread, ti °tromp, Feb. ll. no Half-peck Lou, BANBURY Feb. Ile to tos od 2 Veteboo, Oats, 58a od to SOD Peck—Floor, Oat P Northlands, Coun raid At Door, Bart. ty Saturday, is Dublin, lotto Annie, daughter of pany's Bengal Artiliery. Tuesday, at Masten, ral &iekney, to Inn DS- F. Eyekboh, Es+ of ' Tie Ina fi A Dooklo, wife of HIGH WATI Hondas Afternoon 3S athletes after 4 5! —.—. ..-- d andimblisked by Lini Dace, Temple-I)6G • TRIAL BY BATTLE, tS.c. ming is a Copy of the Bill to abolish , irder, Felony, or Mayhem ; and wa. rr le and Trial by Battle, in Writs of 1(..4 peal of murder, felony, and mayhem, oceeding therein, have been found to bt trial by battle in any suit is a mode of trier. lid it is expedient that the same should bt fore enacted, by the Rises most exce11.772 s . with the advice and consent of the Lords S- poral, and Commons, in this present I'arbe.4.... d by the authority of the same, that fru- all appeals of murder, felor7, or cease, determine, and be made void, and wful for any person or persons to cummencea. al murder, felony, or other offence, s'sino r persons whomsoever, but th at appeals :f mar - r, offence , shall from henceforth he tartly fished; any law, statute, or usage to the coutrari thstanding. ether enacted, that from and after the be received to wage battle, nor shall anv;ssse y trial be had by battle in any writ of riyhtr, which may hereafter be brought, incitt.:esC my law, custom, or usage to the contrary AM —On the 4th of November last, t tic experiments were made on the kJ derer Clydesdale, by Dr. Use, of GI, a voltaic battery of 270 pairs of results were truly appalling. On mini:, the hip to the heel, the knee being p 7 , the leg was thrown out with such ply, to °vet turn one of the asti , ..rants,t4h opted to prevent its extension ! In t 'invent, the rod was applied to the ph: the neck, when laborious brewhin g i nenced ; the chest heated an d fel!• t.. ntruded and collapsed, with t h e rela'air , diaphragm; and it is thought, that h.. tplete evacuation of the blood, pithati. occurred In the third experiment, - nerve was touched, when every muse' . Ter's face" was thrown into fearful scene was hideous—several of the sue.he room, and one Gentleman actu , i'.: terror or sickness. In the fourth :ransmitting of the electral power f , arrow to the ulnae nerve at the vere instantly put in motion, am! the arm was so great, that the corr./ int to the different spectators, some: at it had come to life ! URI appers ion, that had not incisions been made sell of the neck, and the spinal marine il, the criminal might have been re. ght, about twelve o'clock, a fire btr!.e pp of Mr Fitzgerald, oil and cob - nun:al, t. George's in the East. After dezm!- ses behind the dwelling-house, toge:L..l c in trade, further devastation was of tire-engines and a plentiful sup., ly Was yesterday held at the White N rw, on the body of I'. Hull, who fell from fit of apoplexy, and died. Verdict tl was held at the Adam and Eve, 1 , - on the body of Frances Itawlinson, !e• age, who died in consequence of , uf- the smoke of various articles. slue consequence of her throwing z.:c Bleep. Verdict accordingly. ------- PRICE OF HOPS. .13k. NIW TOCERII. Os to 71 Os Kent Ss to 01 Os Sussex 6l 4s to 7! °, Os to 01 Os Essex Ss to 41 lOs Farnham 9l 95 to T.ALLOW, SOAP, asto CANDLES. et 4s 3d I Town Tallow 74SGJ Os Od I Yellow Russia Let 4s 2d I White ditto .............. ei of Alb) Soap ditto Is—Mottled, 1121—Cord, 1161—P.slm lift. , per doz. 13s Od—Moulds, 14s 6d. so LRIDENHALL 'MARKETS, Feb. (By the Carcase.) Id to Ss 01 I Veal 44 $d to 6s SI M to Ss Od Pork 53 4d to 6s od DURSE OF EXCHANGE .11 6 CF. Seville .11 3 Gibraltar. .11 7 2U. Leghorn ...... .51i 11 9 Genoa 474 33 8 241.1. Venice Ital. Liv 24 80 33 914 U. Malta .... 23 AO U. Naples 24 10 2U. Palermo .. 12.341 per oz. 24 10 Lisbon 5B Oporto. .......• . 58 40 ex-ino. Rio Janeiro 394 Dublin lO4 40 Cork.. ,38 Asio of the Bank on Mal- -564 land a. ICES OF GOLD AND SILVER Id in Coin, per oz. to $ • in Bars 4 3 0 • 5 7 OAL MAREET,FaI. is. Ships Sold. Pr ize. 18t Sor Od to 43s 331 5d to 416 9d COUNTRY MARKETS. 11.—Wheat per load Xl7 lOs to i'..:210 5 :er. 48s to 67s—Oats 345 to 45*---bt•un , , 731 to 78s—Rye 9 um to 00s. es, February 11.—Wheat ells to 921--Rat!q 36s to 42s—Beans, 60s to 805--Peae, Ps Is 8d to Is 10d. per Gallon. I.—The price of a Bushel of Wheat Os. Sl— oe', Household, Is 94d. 11.—Wheat 96.0 d. to 10s.61—Beans, Ps. ci es, 0.4;k1 per bushel—Barley, 565 to 74, sad 0. Od per quarter—Bread, Is 10d the had to 00, per sack. BIRTHT Comity of Tipperary, the Lady of Sir Ally of a son. MARRIED. 'blip, Copt. Edward Walcott, E.N. to Chu. 'ter of Col. Melly, of the Mon. India Csgl• fiery. ington, Deputy Asalstant-Commissary-Ges e- be Marie Josephs Eyckhole, daughter of it. of Antwerp. DIED. post last,az Meerut, in the But Indio, Lady ajor-Geoerol Sit R. S. Donkla. it LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. - 3S athletes after 4 . 51 .—., ited anclpublisked by Lou &me i 11.4w1i.' rbCe, Temple-Bor. I I Ii