Star. — London, England, 1816-12-06 00:00:00

1••••..... - ; - • INTLI4IOLNCE. againtt the panel er e rpoth.rt must hav-en • smeared with paint, a eircuitslionce which she denied as haying taken place ; and, tetondky, that the pro. sectaries friend bad given sidifferseas stetting - t)f the statement made to her by Mts. Bquires, on a form er o ccasion, than she had given twday. An attenipt was also made to impeach tl.e Drosecntrixs mo;a1 character. In contradiction of this defence Mr. doom called several respectable witnesses in support of the prose cution, the purport of whose evidence w as, to prove that in fact the roo m in q uestion had not been painted until the Monday following, and that the prosecu iris had always borne the highest character for chas tity, modesty and veracity. Mr. Gomm having replied at considerable length upon the defendant's ease, which he contended was a gross aggravation of his guilt, Lord Eutenais tiou cur charged the Jury, with strong animadversions, on the course nhick meetin the dthe. fendant had thought proper to adopt in g e charge, for hi addition to the crime imrtited ti, him be had called in aiJ the more wicked ctftnce of per jury, by suborned witnesses, to avert the so me doubt dee conrsel of law. His Lordship, however, had whether the evidence was sufficient to support the first count Of the indictment. Of the second being made oat there was not a shadow of uncertainty, but it was for the Jury to say whether the whole charge wen proved to their satisfaction ? The Jury, after about ten minutes consideration, returned a general verdict 'of—Guilty upon both Counts. MOSELEY AND WALKER V. BRUCE AND TIRO%VNT. 1 The plaintiffs are army accoutrement makers in Piccadilly, carrying on lersintss under the: name of Hawke, and Co. The defendants were in partner. ship as army agents, and the cause of action, for goods sold and delivered, arose out ol a s upply ist caps, Sec. to the Linco ln Militia. , Brown had ad mitted judgment to go 4 y default, and the question therefore was narrowe , a to the proof that Bruce was in partnership with him at the time the goods were sold. The Arroanze-Gr NM AL, for the plaintiffs, said, that there had been disputes between the two defen dants, which had nothing to do with this case, which originated in some communication with a Noble Lord, whose name it was not necessary here to intro duce, on the subject of the Regiment of Militia al ready mentioned. The principal witness for the plaintiff was a Mr. Bell, who proved that he had been employed by the plaintiffs to make a demand upon the defendant Bruce for d 1,500, and that Bruce had admitted his liability to the of the whole, exceptiote sum of 5e296 soug ht s i n the present action, tor wh i ch he admitted himself liable jointly with the defendant Brown, with whom he was in partnership at the time the debt was contracted. • Mr. A. Moons, on the part of the defendant. ad.l mitted that he could not resist this evidence; and The ATTORNEY GENERAL then made a claim of interest, founded upon a letter from the two defen dants, in which they agreed that interest should be allowed, on the ground of extended credit. As, however, there was no date to this letter,. Lord EL. LID:BOROUGH was of opinion that it could not be said to include this specific transaction. A verdict was bund for the plaintiff, 4296. PREROGATIVE COURT, DOCTORS' COMMONS, DECAL CHADWICK AND CHADWICK V. ECHO9LING AN!) miens. This was a cause respecting the last will and tes tament of Mr. John Scarnell, late of hetfurd, in the County of Norfolk, deceased. It appeared that the will of the deceased bore date the 24th of February last, and be died on the '26th ot the same mouth. This paper was not signed by the deceased, lie not being able so to do from great exhaustion, arising from the attack of a paralytic stroke which seized him on the 92d of February, and the paper was opposed by two sets of parties,-the next ot kin of the deceased. It further appeared, from the evidence produced, that the paper in ques tion, when prepared tor execution, was read over to the deceased clause by clause, and he approved of COURT OF CHANCERY, DECEMBER L. This being ttn- tbst ee.il atter Michaelmas Term, the Loan CirlieccrAcnt in Lincoln's Inn. No. thing et Any Pitn - lie on,erest ()centred, excvpt the fol lowing point. which we are induced to nufice, nut On Account ot its novelty, but becAuse we are aware • that nia.ly persons engaged in trade have been misled •by a eontrAry opinion In ex-parte Thomas, a mach , bank rupt, his Lordship said , th at a man may be a bankrupt by being proved w have a bsconded from his creditors genet aily, though'there may be no par ticular creditor whom he has avoided. At three o'clock the Court tc-se, when the LORD GHANGELLUR intor med tire Bar, that a% several 100. tient were still in wear, he vgadd sit to bear them to-morrow and Saturday, and after that proceed on appears and further directions. COURT OF ittelp's BENCH, DECEMBER S. • • TIIE KING V. JACOB RORbuN. This was an indictment against the defendant, a c heeseniunger, in Great Russell-street, Covent Gar den, Mr an assault on the 22d June, upon Elisabeth, the wife of Sivires, a painter and glazier in Windmill-street, Tottenham-court -road, with intent carnally to know the said Elizabitth.. There wasa "banal count for a common assault. Mr. GUR u NEY stated time case to the Jury. Mrs. Elizabeth Squire deposed, that she is the wilif of Joseph Squire , who lives at '2B, Wineltilstreett. Tottenhann.court road, and carries on the business of a painter and glazier. He had been erriplo)ed by the defendant, a cheesemonger;at No. 2, Great Rus sell-street, Covent Garden, to paint his house ; and the witness had been desired by her hit•_ I d Oll SA. • turday, the 'Ad of line last, to deal with him for' 'butter ; her husband was in the del bu cndanes siiopot• at the time, and he car ried it home; t the butter n being good, she returned to, the defendant's at about seven or eight o'clock in the evening. She saw Mr.. - Robson in the shop, who was serving two female customers; she asked him to change the butter, and he said "certainly," and desired the witness to sit dowwat the end of the.counter, which she did. When the defendant had served his customers he came to the witness, and observed she had better have her but. ter fresh andfresh (no other person was present), the witness answered that if it made no difference to him, she would be obliged to hint to have it so ; and he told her he would send her state on Tuesday. He asked her to come and look at her husband's painting, but 1 the witness answered that she was the worst person in die world to g ive an opinion, as she should most likely say it was done well: he then asked her to take a glass of wine or ale, but she refused both, as she never drank any thing of the sort : sometimes, but seldom, she took porter—he then began to be Wry impruchnt, and to behave very ill : he said the Witness was a nice little woman, •ar.d tickled her knee, dectating that he had never had her• out of his eye a nce the morning when she had seep him with her husband—he asked the witness if she was in the family way, to which she replied that it was nothing to him, and immediately rose to quit the shop : he then put one hand upon her mouth, and the other round her waist, and dragged her into the parloar, close to the end of the counter ; he behaved very im- Pruderaly aeain, and tried tti get the upper hand of her :—[Here Liad ELLERBOROUGH desired the wit. tress to describe in what. manner the defendant wished . to *et the utfrer hand of her n—He pushed her against the wainscoat, and endeavoured to remove her chess the witness cried out as loud as she could, but tie defendant said it was of no use, as noone would answer, and thgt she must grant him the favour —lie •also exposed his own person to the wit he prevented her from making much noise, by ing his hand upon her mouth : she said she never could wrung a good husband ; and he ausweted that 4 'e was young and foolish, and tleat if she had been ied three or tour years she would have thought ing of it ;,adding, that it was as common as any lg. She could hot get away, as he confined in-his arms, and was very large and powerful : observed, that he could base better women . she twenty a day, and who went twice a day hutch : the defendant had shut the door with loot when he dragged.her into the parlour ; he did he could to accomp lish his purpose, and she did she clink' resist him: the witness got away from.hins as soon as possible ; he then stated, that it would put her things to rights, and be more tongtosed, on the word of a man be would let, her - and he went out of the parlour : she could not iar how long she had been with him, but it was ten minutes: she was very much agitated, but iedto get out at a side door, which was fastened : went to the frost door of the parlour, when the defendant came in upon her, and putting one hand , ipon her mouth, and the other round her waist as fore, he carried her further hack ieto the parlour: , sat down on a chair, and elri.gged her upon his knee, forcing his 'hand down her bosom with great ;oleirce : he also took her hand and forced it into bosom, saying that he wanted a little boy to leave ,me property to ; she did not know she age of the tefendant; be Was elderly, with a bald head, and ...as married : he insisted that the witness must grant him the favour, which she constantly refused; he promised to let her go if she would kee and p itthe al secret, and opened . the parleur door, \ witness made• the. best of her way home to her iusband : she never saw any 'body come into the. shop during the whole time—she Was very ill after wards, and on going borne she saw her nurse, who led her up stairs: the witness had been ill, and was' lust recovering: her bonnet was very ranch bent, and' a button :was torn off.the bosom of her gown. Nell morning the medical man came : the same ightlted she told her nurse th at • she had been very much night i,hse P)l4 her nurse thalhe had been very much 05ultd, and She aim informed bet husband when be came home r the witness was in a pregnant state at `the time, and to the , best of her knowledge she had mis carried in coast enence.. .The ATTORNEY GENERAL addressed the Jury - at consider..ble length, upon • the improbabilitfert the prosecuteiVs story. - • ,Witaesses were called to invalidate• Mrs. Squires . evidence, and that of theiemale friend to whom she* bad complained of Abi delendans's Misconduct) .111,' the principlel object-wf their testititiay whs, firsts 'tub - sillvw.titat the man irsAwhieb the ask was to have taken place , Indices 4reth painted thV e g,' and,-ecetroquentlw . if this rissiittrievistik itadjgaia' . "'" ;:13 , . the same. Sir JOHN NICHOLL was clearly of opinion that the evidence was perfectly satisfactory as to the mind and intention of the deceased. that this paper should operate as his will, and accordingly pronounced for its validity. /BLUNDELL V. KIRBY AND ,THOMPSON. This question arose respecting the last will and testament of Mr. John Keith, late of Mill•street,, Hanover-square. It appeared that the deceased had formerly been in a Nobleman's family, and had accumulated pro- 1 1 perty to the amount of 8600. The will propounded before the Court was dated the 22d of August, 1815. and it purported to bequeath ru the mother of the deceased the interest of 8600 during her life. and then it was to b; divided equally between Mr. Kirby and Mr. Thompson, the two executors named in the will. This paper was opposed by Mr. Blundell, the husband and administrator of the mother of the de. I ceased. It further appeared that In the evening of e the day on which the paper bore date, the same was 'laid before the deceased to execute, but he declined executing it that night, saying he would postpontrtbe :execotion till the next morning, and he died in the intermediate time. • Sir Joint NicitoLL, after recapitulating the evi. denceoilis of opinion that the executors had failed in proof *of the will, and therefore pronounced against hs validity. and grained administration to Mr. John Blundell, the hutband and administrator of the mo tbeerif the , demised. • . COUItT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. 5. sits.lllARY AWN CLAM& t'. DAVIS: This was au action of replevin, brought by Mrs. Clarke, a Lady well known in the mtaropolis, against the defendant, a broker residing in Ontsptir-street,in, order to recover certain goods, which she said he dis tVained without legal right. • - , 'Mr. Serjeant PELL, Counsel for the defendant, as usual in replevin eases, opened the cause. He said the plaintiff was a Lady the Jury bad probably heard They' ot. :The defendant was a respectab le broker. They' would find an the record, that Mrs. Clarke complained of the defendant for taking certain pro rem. wlitich she said he bad no right to take. In nitiswer to that complaint, the defendant allegetc i be distrained the goods in questiou, as the agent Mrs. Campbell, for arrears of rent: ' Mrs.. Clarke;, reply. put upon the pleadings that she- did-stris, • in apparel, value ten pounds s o d upemdc, the ro . per ry oeStirah_Noone.in diodwelltng Loss: of :s; FOSIer. Th e ((pawing a trocious oturAge has been pe r p e . tr ated t he. Conmty of Wa!erford : B. tween the hours of seven and eight o'cluck, on tl e eigh t o f the.t2'2d ult . . the house of WILLIAM PIIELAN, of Kit. moyl4ll, Aairother recount says Kildown,) near wi n test•wwn, on the linds of the College cf clans, was attacked by nee armed itiffimit three of •thenr entered, And immediately prcceded to his bed. Awn, while one remained as sentinel claim in the kitchen. Thew who went to the bed-room succeeded in procuring the aLjeci of their search—lis ail.nor. s i b Ling of ...theta centained small box, on tlizir mums to the kitchen, they gave to ti-e m an whoa they hid *placed upon guard. Phelan's v.f ai when she saw :rear property thus consigned int , hands of One of the robbers, exclaimed, t. y(,u are robbed, and destroyed ror eve 7 !" ham, with a s.:;itit of resolute bravery, immt.ch., 3 4 l weed the uni twful pessesettr ut his wl.o.ti ;Is tt a throat, who fired at bon, but, pr.vldeatiAly; wi l es e ff e ct. •Tho wife, with no leks boldros 411 d cerintpl seized another of the utwelcchne at t't tArr: nionitnt ; her ton, having gone to 11, r iAott,tv;-;.1,14 fired at ley tile man with whims she w•ts but he escaped with the same g.xid fortue; Li; taunt had experienced. in the tue•tn time, the be:, ecp taining the ruonty, dropped from the rail 4n wi whom Phelan' struggled, and was insmitii plactdit a state of sahl.ty by one of It is dAnglit-:rs. .1 - ne re.* of this rather cstrAordit,ary occureee was, 1441 assailants were beaten oft by Pliel.•n. assisted bybi family, with the loss of a tooth, And after a m i tts . stave contest, hitt with the proeivatiou of his vropenr. even after it appeared io nave become the hoyden v of -these treeb..oters. ' . • . iv 1 .:: • I I MA a WHIM to that Lady. house, and therefor 6 was ... hula hire Mrs. Campbtill'i ' ^. l'S. Campbell !i, she re- lowill the. t st No. 16, Green street, anceld,issaaSTdalieSertesas4'siasteYr7tog., 14kh!d7. of Illegant "Pear:. e coming in M tech, :even the whole of .. the Grosvenoiaquare: She the house, which was ready furnithed, and to pay c l ° 8 1 1 1e 5 c ; t . etio Mn. her rl.: M sis A te rt r ; s A hlit Cl,l. was tO occupy tend F, on whether Mrs. Clarke was to pay monthiy or not ; omit twelve guineas a-week. The witness could not say she entered on the 15th of bl'rch and occupied it ni, at until May following . one The Witnesli be i ng cr oss-examined by Mr. S.ajeant *Fe i VAUGHAN, admitted that the agreement for aret Doti se ' the was made for Mrs. Clarke, by Mr. George, . sot 1 M t s. Clarke and her. daught e rs went over the hou se, rn tc and referred Mrs.'Camphill tO Mr. George, who i!d- t td *1 vanced aitiU on Mri. Clarke's aecount. 9 .fete Here Mr. SerjeantPatA observed, ,that the defen- of t dant would give the plaint eietlit for seso teceived rob on aceouat, as well as thE Volta of Cie goods tits. spirit 'trained, wi ich , u nder the terms of the Act of Par. lawf liament, would pr e vent the plaintiff .from being sub- 'en ject to any further distress.vife, The Learned Judge was of o p inion that the pro.. of pnsitioli was fair. On the whole, there was no evi• VIII, min dence to support the plaintif's Case, and t he Jury, natter his Loinship's nirection, found a verdict tor wit the cleiCll.Ltilt for the rent in a rrear, minus £5O. 3. ay, The v.-relict, of course, renders the distress regular. Mr. CVNI:.!ING intimated,after the vetelita, that trug 'there was a demurrer on the record, and a plea of by ltryfi icoverture. ! The JUDGE said in answei—“ The defendant hat 7e -' Failed to make good her plea, and you cannot avoid lns• the damages." win The galleries were occu p ied b y Ladies. and the .are cause excited considerable interest, thou g h ut sligla . lb.* 1119p:1/rice. MIDDL ESEX SESSIONS. Yesterday Mr. Bishop, a solicitor, was convict ed of Art ,am an assault on a Mr. Lodge, and ordered to pay a fine 'ot se 10 to the King. SW 1 13. Wins was convicted of a brutal and unjustifiable to assault on a poor man, of she name of Sharpdale, and tot ._.... sentenced to pty ten pounds to the prosecuinn The case was particularly aggravated, by the poor man compromisean, 1 baying offered to compromise matters, pi ovided he le E was paid 255, for the week he was ke p t out,of work, sat I by the bruises he had rece ived, and instead of settling with him, the defendant had most cruell y used him. The Court, in the severest mauner, cored: coned such brutal conduct, and admoniiihed the defendant to take care never to appear there again OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. In Yesterday lamer Mitchell was indicted for robbing ' i Mr. B. W. Sterry , on the Kin g 's hi g hway, of a watch, chain, and teals, his property. —On the 22d la t r • of ill ,re. _ T, ;' '' 11 \tie of Nove.nber, he was going from Ternitle Liar to wards Covent Garden Theatre. At the corner of MATRIMONIAL TELICITY. Catherine street, the ptiuoner pushed against and " But happy they, the A L of ter kW hostl-d him with consid erable violence, and then pre. Such n the lananaan of the Immortal I nom:an, obeli . co. tended to assist to prevent his tailing ; in dont?, this i t r. e V!, t th . • e tt N .: l 3 l r .tr t. t :‘7.• 13 ::".7 .:7: ., n , :e.. o t a i a l :', ti k r t4 . k t he held the prosecutor's 2rtns so tight, Unit he could 5 4 1214 4 i to s ac ; sound mind is a gourd bean , . not prevent him from taking his watch and seals, XI IiISSRS. GOSS and Co. Mernhers.of the Raid with which he made off. Tile prosecutor immedi- v.t. College of Sur-eensla Lood:.o, l aye nintann denint ately gave the alarm, and the prisoner wat taken into . th eir att ci.doi. !or their 15.5t . 17 -year. to the st..::s ..f :hoe& &rya custody before be had gone many yards. When taken, aces whi'llechb•lefsr:m"2l.7tit.nl";:tert La, ; ; c ". r f " 'rr ii r:::".„,,,., tri f ' . ,. he flaci the watch in his hand.—The Jury found the 1 cations they base isitherto received :min pets it, i f the trot it; prisoner guilty of stealing the watch, brit not with ; thiciion, and the etnfest tn success at .etilng their ca r normals force and violence. 1 of treatment in such complaints, induces them time publicly:a Thomas P. .11.fanffirlel, aged 13, was indicted for . eir assistance. Ito 41 cases of Inehility or I.)ehrtetni. sate thcr offr r t e !l ntit int tram the too &rawly, of n av'epatiset in .he Oa ste aling four silver tea spoons and a silver cream jng, i t i es of t„laci,able /i.e. tine iirl'otoweat,..,;jirtmeoi ;,b,nsennt the. properry of Thomas Swann.—The prosecutor' re- l or a secret solitary he.htt, which weste.!r.v,tv. ttlefle of Ott *his sides at Islington. Oa the 25th of November, the aaddesnoys the flower of youth; by prAucillyr.titi:t in thew • prisoner sold some apples to ins daughter,bate aiid t iennant9; w h o seem ! sex, std impotence In the ot/2r, they olze . cure. T i.' Tthose who, from such emr.ilaiii.e, are e,reseut-. l rstscl afterwards observed him coming out of the parlour ' Into the marrita state , and ashamed to• , : . e ., t ,... 1 .1,,,„,d0in wiNdow. When she went in she missed the articles their itlfirin.ties in silence,. it shams! be te,or.bng to ktrv., hnf' in question. which she was positive were placed oil ever difficult or ineffectual tl be dertred by tote the sideboard, a short time before. Tie property PrastitiOntre, Mat by a renovating and al ihle method i s hryleir was identified, and the Jury found him—Guilty. • be reamed to a tumid and vigorous consri.untie. .. tends i disorder, frequently contracted in a moment of in.q.erene. 301 %how: lug and Anne Leg were indicted for stealing 1 every species of Venereal I nfection, b y A 01 iii ,tut neving a £lO Bank of England note, the property of Joseph ! tootle of treatment, is speedily and radically removed, withii! Eaton.—The prosecutor is a porter at Newgate Mar-1 i dnnonezetise, u aiso N:ric ia turis; o ri f t he r : n lr i et w hi : s ti atia muslin in ket. The note in question,. which was numbered ; : I :7 n t i :',, t , to t th p l are f , idatt e " 41 . 16,856, was stoltia from a box in his house On the rou abled t s o e c trcts o‘ li tta s e ' Cartic; retro:cm of arkizti can he g iven to several Noblemen and Creitlialre 4 14th of November last. The female prisoner was at ' high respectability. wins hive been cured In a very . h art 1 4604 the time his servant.—Mary Eaton .stateJ, that she after having lalu...red Uteclet strictutel for m..t . I T 9"9_. kept the box a here the money was. The morning after the note was stolen, the prisoner, v k 't a , o , ,! i i i . a e r c r o tid nu e b, '.: a irles, vi w i hos im e veenneetnztiorneu.tcolottnmsseay ate:at Anne Ing a pies Sine reflection to know that by a proper persetraneelil (whohad been suspected of stealing it) absented her- , their remedies, the general health is renovated, amt: the :iota self from her USUAL work.—A clerk ot Mr. Fisher, a mews removed. Messrs. Gess ti,d Co exe;thiveiy prtics , lisg t w ist jeweller, proved that the note in question was paid to, him by the prisoner Anne leg , who had purchased c n u i re k of i tl b ane a particular fronipwlatihi.rtric,b)rzeru ti s ta o t: h t e7 . l a ly to to the ignorant :,'„ a wedding ring and a pair of ear rings in his shop.— that they In.ve been F lopeny .-Jueated and initiated into este, pi. L e , n thin: it i but j the '1.',12:`,....,"? „„ to OA Mr. Baron RICHARDS summed up the evidence, and branch of the profes.don (certificates ot 'Knell, from inflow. the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty against Anne pitals, and tesrimoilials from the hi g hest , professineg,astbei tik. . Ing, but acquitted her husband. tiwy have to coovince any inquirer). •I hat a erst..c.ce A tar warmer hemtspheie of our eastern world, as Take.; as In o:herpOise Joseph Prescott was indicted for stealing a bay mare, e n nui:dna them 10 awl t, that their they age heen et* a bridle and saddle, the property of Thomas Faun fined to diseases already enumerated, dell.—The prosecutor was coming to London with a renovation to such as may • labour under t,:e. cbtilitsat effects of a life p a - st d un,ler the torrid some. Aud War% waggon. Besides the horses attached to the waggon, that (saving 1 rs .la,. oppAtteuities, M their professiosti IX?' there was si led mare, which he occasionally rotten—. c i t y, of foraiivg a„ intimate „ 1 „4, 1 ,,,,,,, w nt2 the cote Having been taken ill on the road; he went into the solution:a habits is seafaring sper,..ns, they enur ro n a l waggon, and the mare followed. The pi ismer wall the a i 6 r 4 L u i t i a del c e 6 u oh irn hrTt Al 'n -a d r i e i 4 O i se ; i t n ila to t t q lie nt s t l . c h c e frae3et •g coming along the same road, and asked the prosetu- ~ tor's servant to let him ride, which was granted.— ...ic general Practithi r tier, ari l d the y c me-taw That Ow Tpretsomol., constitute a fair,grouod for ili.• uopre,•veletaird. co -:.i..tet.te will After riding a short time alongside the waggon, the which they have, by the l'ultlie: be•sii."'.4 ittsefary tnutan 4 , l servant looked about, andfound be was gone away to be consulted at their hem ,t daily (perovl:;"te.r arts Inr;,. with the mare.—J. Oxdall proved that he bought a bypPatat.ietatntscsinwt;ecittatti:l4.,ywaritehi‘serizuress: , : h t % o c s a„. t.i y t:4 - : raric4s , mareirom ale prisouer, winch the prosecutor atter- o f a w ir cow, age, a , z n 0..,„„ of ihitiv ., „ clo3 ::i t a retr" wards proved to be his property.—Mr. Justice BAILEY for advice and medicsnes; and tlte resined'es nil he m' 11 413 ' r summed up the evidence, and the Jury found the pri- forwarded to aat oitis? i/I(, , f!ntr.., I soner—Guilty—Death. Gaas and Co.Surg9,oll9,l3Vitctriale.street. reer.or•et: William Brown was indicted. for burglarionsly breaking and mitring the dwelling house of Wrn. Parker, and stealing therefrom a cloth pelisse, a gown, and other articles, his property.—Ann Parker, the wile of the prosecutor, stated, that on the night oh the 11th of November, she went to bed, leaving the key under the door for' her son, who was out at a public house, drinking with the prisoner. The son returned home, and found theltey _in'the door ; ail,' on entering, discovered that the house had been rob bed of the articles in question. Early on the follow ing morning the prisoner vats stopped on the Com mercial Road by the patrole, and some of the articles stolen found in hit possession. Guilty—Death. The following were also capitally convicted : James Johnion, for stealing _bank notes and other securities, the property' of Messrs. Bourdillon and Hewitt. Mary Smith, for stealing sizty.tw6 -yards of satin; :the property of. Messrs. Ellis and Brown, privately, in their shop. . • . ~ . land Faster. for stealing a large quantity of 'wear. prey BiaTEI4. October 2, at ct. lieleta, I,aly lore, of a son. Saturday, at etiaulam Dock-yard, Viacunwks4 Torrirgtaa a KM. Sunday a poor rottil woman in llorrivon's close, Hiituttivez i Edinburgh, was drilvticd oft wo boys and a girl, who are and the mother bk. ly to do well. Tuesday, at Gitrktart, I)dvon, n'rosand Wit.iam Sheifeen, F.sq of the liotioutahle Coropsny's IVlihtryion% to Harriet, youtv-st daughter of the late I hones' itordell,bi, of Bath. Thilcstlay r'n6ll.lht, In the Cathedral of Cork, tieet 4aru4 Turner, o:: tbe•half-r.ty. of his MaiPety's late Sicli.lßtrairtt, to Mrs. Alice Evaus, Ur Skibbereen. 1/I.,:tday, Captain J. Green, R.N. to Miss Rr.hh,ef thftked. Last week, at Aber&-en, Duna d M'aekent'e, a la!) , lnrer,ari Ins Tears and seven nton; hs, blets:g torn on the lezh Api!!, an, lie had been its the Arsti7, :tit t uAht at the bull: ui COSA% and althtstigh in a d. ehairt st4te of health Inr tom: trte, ben. rains an his ment7l ta:ulties until withln a few dare at hada:h. ...:-..- 3 - --------...-------. sMi IliFI LLD MARKET, DECiIIkICR 6. B ee f is 0.1 to 4% o.'. f VeiL 4 % o itoli 61 Mutton $s 4tl to 4, 4.1 I.l'-rk 41 0.1 to s, SI lisast% 740-.l.twov and Latutir3o sl -Casette) -r 1 6 IS HAY AND STRAW; rEa. I.OAD. Meadow Hsi 41 0. to 01 00% jrClover tie to to SI 16 straw 11 1:6% to el 4 4* ..................0: PliteliS OF GOLD AND StI.VEIX. - Portugal Gold in CIA% ySt os. £ ti• dd. lorZign Gold in Bin; . - $i Ss 61. New Doubloons • . u uis OJ . . New Dollars . • 041 lud Bank stock P e l l l i ; CI: Of SI OCKS rocti 'l lf TS tlt:3lo:tnaitts_DlA6 Y. i 7 v. S per Ct. lied. 0 1 2 19 i Dial) Cons.— Amp. Ans.-- 1 4 per Cans. 741} I.:chequer Bins ti 1 PI Spec Cent. Navy.— Cons. tor am 6ket* Siiilig a Lottery Tic 40-4 le Loos Anne. 14 3-16 ii( ol4 WATER TO MORRO W AT I.OIOOYI DPW.' • Morale 4,6 aim. alio' A Itc r /Kris . I.OsIPPN- Peered by i.telf. r, v.:Ur 1 . •"' Published claire, sad st the /1 „6 . 050, Neto,ll Bete • 111 , G , 1 Y-- but the would (avow- nes: : ',puttink could . she WA is:eyrie aothin thing. bgr in ob than s cht his to un he all sl: frpen. !ha Mcow* Oh II Sweat full. t tried she s defer upon befoi he si knee his I tom deft was him be sect wit btu she W:1 al led jus au be tit CJ C 4 Pi 11 tl hi a . • NTH . P JII: Tbst d i g I se. TUgSDA Wills Foram Storesico n " 300 ,, vo irk of temoid Pack % frau ght and ca ." than A i tic k s , the et the princil Reiel Metro plain printed who OW an • ALL lAON 1.• ~ TWO OF 1 • wAI rHE A. eve/ poi ordirs that T. dig ea * porch* p o lettnent and n mere Ticket., wit F ort y other scary, on " t o an addliii to its (wine were whow Ant be so hi coe dit:lg that tint splendid them Whim ASH. at h bi s Agent Zabel M . EMI SHELUDAI maim& 1 With onsim deitco of do Burke, Fos, When Ai the distingu try; his lot h'gliesr Chi qtubat ratan be expeacid open a wi.l , ashibited biopaphy Printed .?.~ .. . trHE 1 1. SUM the htipeac Priutetl yard; and In prep abort-hand Contnions, .Kotahimatlt. lit Delp of wt denote st.; hitherto be hintheJ perste,. I F the from known tin ticnt is:dtoc k is net ira verdienwn fore br soil for the sak can now 1) , Ten prt C dun half y , sn6y resuai neociahle ;manner as MOW**. atreirt-ewlr formed an Sr Fr.. 1.01 fstm , , V:1,1 teadity eul as well a ihe City reque T 1-1. so of monosith. guarded pot OXf Ma►rene litedmine ttliflg 1111:i fail, by B Cheapll.le Ur, otri Coeutry, UM, T is • I gent ARED Tieeti44 ilabt:t:3l *tacks ul Aw!tur II k th v y b Ozymel t Of Cie pr "M magnet /gives in lloPrepir tieurd 14 4 o‘yi " 41 41 10 d 11'. # L t . k), --- N. - '• i~