Star. — London, England, 1804-12-07 00:00:00

MINN the such( that he h their vale tvia ad ha be fuppn irsinderfi the Eton the fate? tion. Hei had been feent by fame go - lorse, II arryfinall they . bra the Judy linaller - ordir, a sad pie weak tl &wife The 1 safe Am fold by', bur of al Mr. 1 al =ld hat would h Mr( an, Aa Richari bottle ft the Sm ratline( bad ref and pre 311.Lant hie cafe the Mai - produce ant at I that illi laved fi The DiMaa WILLI A i it WI France, ffevent itmir, it at that with hi flour. d Sir Job (mina convey the Tr retina retaine hit hoe and M Conti the nei difficul Grubb ceivini Willia nimbi and th Bell, c Met Stated pflrfri for hi vetted after' ac Mr in l i fendi mita M depa witn then i the 1 ( to I fact dent 1 . . the '' 1 the j ahe 1 : tics dni the re( 111 'l6 :11, lIVTELLIGECE. COURT OF KINGS BENCH, DEC. g. 111-AVIMAXIM V. MATV s, .iher;,f‘rtile CosOlj Beria • Mr. Cs!kßitt , W Paid this was an afflict awl* the sh e af ..1 Bet Mire, for having made It 'return of no goods, where it was well known he hid feized on good., and - had fold them under theplaintiff's execu u..n to a confiderable amount. The plaintiff. John Slaymaker, having a confiderable claim agaiolt his brotherßichard, for which he had ptitainid judgment, a writ was direard to the Sheriffs to levy the fame from the goods of Richard. Mr. Vincent, the plain tiff's attorney. underilatiding that fume interruption was given to the butinefs, by perfons who pretended. fit 11, that Richard had *committed an aa of bank ruptcy; and afterwards, that the plaintiff and he were partners, gave the Sheriff time tillthe 14th of May to rake his return. I'9 his allonahment, be afterwards found, that although to his knowledge a feizure to a great event had been made, a catalogue of the con teats, and an advertifement of the time of fele publifft ed, a return of no goods of which a levy could ke made had been rendered by the Sheriff. They were now told that, to bo lure the bankruptcy, the part &c. of which mention had formerly been made, were founded on mitlake ' • but that the plain ti ought to be contented withs6ol. being the pro- duce of the goods on which the levy was made...-. The Learned Coonfel recolleaed an t iteation on the ChriOnpher Inn, at Eton, where Mr: braham was the auaioneer, !paint? whom, When it was alledged that he had allowed ' he effeis to go greatly under their value, he had put it feemingly as the argrourii on ad boallaria to his friend Mr. Gibbs, bow he could be fuppofed to have donf better, and if it was not wonderful he had been able tv get any thing, as all the Eson tints were quizzing him during the time of the fele ? That was elleetned a fati.failory explana tion. Here, however, the cafe was different; the goods had been fold among a number of brokers, it would item by appral:ement on Saturday, for 5601. and the fame goods were fold, agreeably to the original cata logue, by order of the Sheriff as it bore, and as was originally appointed, on the Monday following., when they brought more than double that fum ; and yet she Judgment creditor was told, that he mull take the linaller fum. The goods were latterly fold by the - oedir, and ander the execution of the Sheriff of Berks. tad rot be would now tell the perfon having thejudg memo that he aloft take lets than the fum got by the Sheriff at the (ale fo announced. The witneffes for the plaintiff fully shade out the Safe Rated by Mr. Garrow, and that the goods. when fold by pubic anaion brought 8861. los. belittles anum ber of articles not comprehended in the catalogue. Mr. Kant, a Carrier, of which profeffioa Richard Siarnaker slfo was, proved that the hottest waggons, =ld barman; alone were worth tsol. and that he mould have given that fum for them. Mr Gums, for the Defendant, let up the plea of ms. AA of Bankruptcy, previoufly committed by Richard Sloymaker, he having been abfent from his houfe from the Therfday p r eceding the execution to the &today. But in t his he failed. He then at tempted to thew, that the attorney for the plaintiff had refaced to confent to a public Talc of the goods, sod prated the Sheriff to make the return; but Lord litutsmooouort thought he bad failed in that part of his eafi alio ; not only fo, but that the Attorney for the Plaintiff had. by the letter which the Defendant produced, acceded to that propofition, though he had not at the fame time thought it neceffary to agree that the-fale thould, as the Sheriff wiled it, be de layed for fourteen days longer. The Jury immediately found for the Plaintiff — Damages 8861, Dos. . WILLIAM BILL O. JAMS! GRUBS AND RICIN. it will be reel - Mated, that in the !aft war with France, it had become the policy of this country, to pcvent the admitflon of (Lips laden with grain and Sour, into the ports of the enemy. Mr. James Grubb, at that period, was flapereargo and proprietor, kind: with his partner, Mr. Mather, of a la r g e q uantit y of Sour, Mined ft om Philadelphia to that Republic.— Sir John &dale Warren, who had a fleet under hil, command on the French coaft, detained the veffel conveying this flour, and gave to Mr. Grubb notes as the Trealury for its value. Mr. Grubb, intlead of returning to his partner in America with the money, retained it in his own hands, in confequence of which bia houfe in,Philadelphia was greatly embarrafTed, and Mr. blather, who t eptefented it on the Weßern Continent, obtained a loan of 20,0c0 dollars, front. the neighb •Illing merchants, to eV! him under this difficulty. For this loan he gave notes in the name of Grubb and Mather, and one of thcfe merchants, re ceiving fueh notes for the aftitlance he afforded, was William Bell, the prefcnt Plaintiff. To obtain his teimburfcmcnt, he fent over his power of attorney, and the fuaable documents, to his brother, Mr. James Bell, of London. Meffis. ERSKINE and PtYLLEN, for the Plaintiff, Rated the rafts of the c.tie. They ('aid, after a i ptirflit of feveral years, Mr. James Bell, who ailed for his brother in Philadelphia, dtfcovered and ar ?cited the Defendant, Mr. Grubb ; irnmeffiately afterwards an interview was bad at the chambers of Mr. Hodgfon, a rifpeaable attorney, where filch an acknowledgment of the debt was made by this De fendant, as took the Debt out of the Statute of Li mitations. Mr. Hodgfon and Mr. James Bell were called, who depofed to the converfation at that meeting. Mr. Wool), for the Defendant, Paid, he had no witnefs to contradia this confeffion of the debt ; he therefore mull refign his pretest - tons on that part of the pleading, but he contended that he had a right to avail hi•ofilf of the law of America, by which l oc h roma , y notes were invalid, unlefs the conli deramm for them was Rated and proved. This objetlion was overruled, on the ground, that the Statute of the 3 d and 4th Q 2 een Anne applies the faro: commercial l a w to huh countries, and no aheration had taken place in America, as to this par ticular. m r. w ont , t h e n a rgned. that thefc bills were rro doted as an ar.t-rfnc:it ; • .•, tinder this tlefcliption, they m ild rot ~e A hee.t'll . o the :C,Clllle laws required lb , / be tramped. Loud E L Livannot;e:l4.—" If the agreement were made here, that would Le required, bat we cannot make all the world tulle& to the laws of the Brit; fh revenue." Verdi& for the Plaintiff, principal and intereft, I 10301. . , had committed an aft of bankruptcy, had been prov ed. It was true the order for his denial had not been antecedent to the fad ; but it was tantamount to it, when an approkal of tuch denial was made from day to day. Verdi& for the Pliitniff--Damages 4231. 545. Bd. PHILIP OSSALDESTON V. JOHN DAISY •ND 7. FLAMITOMI. The Plaintiff is a fea faring man, who married the daughter of a Mr. Gibfon, for whole accommodation a houfe was taken in Saville row, at the (mall annual rent of s 51. During the ahfence of Mr. Oibaldefton, at Oporto, bis father-in-law had engaged this houfe in the occupation of Mr. John Darby, one of there Defendants. After his return, lie lived in this dwel• ling, and about twenty-one months fubfcquent to ite, being engaged for him, his wife died. While the corpfe was in the honk, Mr. Darby called for the rent, when the Plaintiff reprefented, that d.:cency would not permit him to go out to coiled his deists, but that when the due funeral refped had been paid to his departed wife, he would obtain a fufficient (up. ply to fatisfy the demand. The day after the funeral, Mr. Derby again called, and irifitted upon the pay ment of the rent; but not obtaining what he fought, a diftrefs was levied by the other Defendant, J. Flam llone, whom the Learned Counfel for the Plaintiff denominated as animal called a DYrefs Broier.• The debt, if exilling at all,' was only for three quarters of a year, or t 11. ss. the rent by which the Defendant's OVlffreceipt for the firfk year being payable at Mi chaelmas yearly, though the Defendant had put in execution on the loth of Augull, before the full year was due. All the goods of the Plaintiff were feized, and fold at a neighbouring public bottle, under the hammer fur pl. ; no return had been made, even of the furplus ; and under thefe circurnflatices the anion was brought. Mells. GANNON?, BORNOUDH, and MaaavAT fup• ported the cafe of the Plaintiff on three grounds.-e- Firft, that the landlord diftrained for more rent than was jultly due ; fecondly, that the landlord, without confent, pflponed the Pale of the effects from five to nice days; thirdly, that the produce of goods fold confiderably exceeded the amount of the rent due, and no return had been made. Lord ELLENSOROUGH here remirked, 'that. as the evidence flood, it was not attempted to be proved that the diftraining was for fingle quarters, but for the whole year. Mr. ERSKINe, for :be Defendant, endeavoured to , imprefs the jot y with the idea that the Defendant had acknowledged that the rent was due ; this he endea • voured'to (hew by reading a letter from the Plaintiff to the Defendant. The letter certainly admitted that money was due, but only for three quarters. Lord Ezz an 'mono tf.—" Still, Mr. EIININT, you have no right to diftrain for more than what is due, and you cannut add the King's taxes. The Jury would confider the furry that would be neceffary to re place the goods, &dulling s 11.55. fur the three quar ters levied for." A verdid was found for the Plaintiff in the (um of 331. tss: being the difference between the rent due of I tl. 51. and the furn of 451. at which the goods were valued, although they were fold under the ham men for two thirds that amount. NORTH, &C. 0. Olitlial.L. This was an aaion on two promiffory notes,the one for 4801. and the other foragool. There was nothing' farther remarkable in the cafe than this, that although the Defendant had retained Mr. Erfline and other eminent Counfel, he chnfe to decline their alfittance on the, trial, and to plead his own caufe. The defence jet up by him was, that no confideratlon-had ban grant ed for the bills. To prove this, he adduced witnefs ifitt witnefs, but their evidence did not rubftantiate his defence.—The Jury immediately found for the Plitiutiffe—Damages 13801. . , joists v. lIINCIILIT &MIS LLOYD. . The Plaintiff, Mice Mary Jones, was a frail Lady Wm lived 'in Catherine-lane,Eaft Smithfield, and the, brought this aelion againft the Defendants for an at fault and falfe imprifonment. Her principal witnefs, Martha Howard, a girl of the town, defcribed the affault in the molt aggra vated terms.—Ske s Rated that the Defendants, with out any provocation, entered the houfe of the Plain tiff, beat her, and. eiragged her by the hair to the watch-houfe, whetn• ila was kept all night : but upon a full invettigation of the eircumftances, it appeared that the Plaintiff and this Martha Howard bad grofs ly infulted Mrs. Hinckley, and a young woman of the name of Anne ThoMpfon, as they were palling through Catherine-lane ; and that they made ufe of language. and Committed arils of indecency towards them, which it would be indelicate to defcribe. Mr. Hinckley and the other Defendant, for this intuit, Really conveyed blifs Jones to the watch-houfe, where Rte eondulted herrelf with the unnoll violence and intemperance. The Jury, after hearing all the falls, thought the jullice of the cafe fuEficiently anfwered by a verdift for the Plaintiff, with one [killing damages. DAVIIISL SHAW. Mr. Eas tins Paid, that this aftion depended on the Taft, whether or -not Mr. Debrett, the Bookfeller, committed an aft of bankruptcy prior to the ,4th of May left? Mr. Richard Spencer proved the execution of a bond, to which he was a witnefs, dated t 9th Novem ber, 18°3, granted by Mr. Debrett to Mr. Wm.Stn. art, .for 4341. by four different inlialments, the arlt of which became due on the ,9th of January, 1804. ---- Lundie, who lived with Mr. Debrett, in the year t 804., Paid, that in the beginning of that year, and down to the time of his failure on the 18th of May, when the commiffion was taken out, Mr.D.had been in very bad circumftances. He very frequently went out in the morning, immediately after breakfall, and did not return till dinner time, without making any provifton for bills which were expefted to be pre fented. The witnefs frequently denied him to his creditors, whey he was aftually at home. He could not partieularife names, but he underftood the percents to whom he denied Mr. D. to be creditors. He has denied him to Mr. Stuart, whom be had heard alle Mr. D. for payment of a debt due to him. Mr. D. was at one time fence January laft in great diftrefs. For three, four, or five days together he has known -- him go out in the morning and not return till evening, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DECEMBER s. leaving inftruftions with die witnefs to take direftions BATH kAIIMONIC SOCIETY. as to fuch bills as might come in, and when notaries Bowsu v. As itee r.—This was an Aftion brought called, to fay the bills would he paid to-morrow. by the Treafurer of the Harmonic Society, to reco- Croft examined by Mi. Paul fir the Defendant —He ver damages of the Defendant, a linger, for breach could not fwear that Mr. Dehrett had ever given him of a bond, in which he had engaged with ethers to inftruaions to deny him. Knowing, however, ;hat perform at the mitfical meetings of the Society, from Mr. D. could not have paid them, be had denied the at Friday in November ifio3, to the left in him ; and when the witnefs informed M r. D. he Paid, April following. Very well, and never difapproved, but rather famed Mr. Serjeam COCKFLL defeeihed the Society to be pleated that he had fo denied him. Mr. D. was as emnpnfed of the Nobility an d? Gentry refiding in all much embarraffed in his eircuenttancee its the Oatiber parts of the kingdom it ld at the White Hart, and November preceding, as he was at the time he in Bath, and profelfinnal gentlemen being employed had already Iwo, n to, and then alfo bad left bills un. to contribute to the harmony of the concerts, the De provided for. He began to be anbarraffed in :he be. (indent was chofen as a man of ability, and Mr. Bowen ginning of that year. conceiving the fingers, demonfers, and other perfor- Mr. W. Wall laid, he was concerned in an aelinn mere, might be punatial, if liberally treated, gave a againft Mr. Debrett, and the debt was paid by Mr. I guinea each ni,sht,and injured their being pi efent by a Stuart, one of the bail, on the 3d November - I 8 03. bond which the Defendant entered Min and figned. Mr. Ratiflaw, clerk to Mr. Dawfon, attorney tan- I Previous to November, when the firfl meeting cone der the commiflion, proved tke alignment. , menced, it had been whilpered that leveret Clientle- Crefi-examiard by Mr. Letre.—S tici he bed fern ) min intended to withdraw ; in confeemence.- of Mr. Debrett, Mr. Stuart, and Mr. Dawfon together, which, a formal notice was fent of the sneering, and refpefting Mr. Debrett's butinefs, but could not fay their attendance requefled ; the Defendant anti others if it was at the exalt time when the commillion was under the bond, however, thought fit to abfent, and taken out. Being ailed as to the eonverfation which it was necetfary to procure other performers from then patted, he appealed to his Lordfli i p if he was Frame and Bristol, in order that the Noble Perfon- TO THOMAS TAYLOR ESQ., naps N. 9, Bridie-Rrea, L 0 .96.9, bound to anfwer that queltion, as he could have be- ages, who were to be at the Concert , might not be I F E LL it a duty incumb ent upon me, to anion* come privy to it only in a confidential manner, as inc o nvenienced. The Learned Serjeant obfaved, he you of the very give and extratioLoary Cure I have recdval being clerk to Mr. Dawfon ? After tome alterza- fhould prove the Defendant had not p.rformed his from your Invaluable Medirbse--LEAKV, PATP.brE mese tion on this point, the witnefs espreffed his with to engagement, and the damages would be in pro- Abet two years ago I was attacked with a VLSOWL llta. anfwer the queftion, rather than it thould lee ima portion to the expence occ-fioned by his default. omosa.whieb I treated rather nightly for forte dolt, but the DV; pined that there was any thing under his refute', far- Mr. Good being called, fetid, he law the De- e to afe at trosthentreading. tlse all ore? my B teat ody, t _l was Wird to apply they than a with not caufelefily to divulge hismafter ' s fendant and others fign the bond, after which they only ttin tie pnrary n drelicir trem f:lfthewer at athcro t: T ; thkrri t r it k tiabiteoudwi:„uadat a g ui to vs bufinefs. He Paid he had heard convertatinns as to did not attend the rehearfal on the 2014 November, tint, anti from being Mr. D.'s affairs, but never as to his commitlion. He nor the fucceeding meeting, cot fequently fubilitutes a mac Sbektoo. Thc liken that fpread an °army limbs, Iva never heard it laid , or underftood, that Mr. Ginger were procured from 'Vomit and Briftol , at the ex- &Ted nw a complete On i ne t his c tee n n : cn ti y o t n trecn i , I:cir- s .n . d fi d da• Paired rd deabai Cake was to call at Mr. D.'s houre, and Mr. D. be refuted pence of fifteen guineas. Witnefe fisted the rules LlO'cry..hWutl':,°,l).n.i:r4' tie to him, for the purpofe of conftituting an aft of of the fociety fince its inflitn : inn, and dcfcribed the in whichy our Pills had' ueeeedrd, I WA. 711:Cd to ttr ma t uy box at Meetings as appointed from November to April, to them, whirli I thought rather relieved me, and by perfeveraney bankruptcy. Mr. Peace admitted, that the denial of a perfon have been altered Ps as to conclude in Match : a 1.. r two or three n.unths. and ' "flowing your Dirodliona, l exp. contlituted an aft of bankruptcy, as to keeping the mifundertianding alto prevailed among the member?, risneueadihreurtnftnuni.ooll3' • ., , ie t it h elari from Pain. the Sord_, houfe ; but at the fame time he fubmitted that Mean. Dr. Harrington, the founder of the rode: y, withdrew Lid wolifee bfi ou li t tiiil l y . a . a l O il ' . ‘ i.'n n ‘ , l ' hue 0 ., ° -; Pc ni frdl b f ot ru wT rt I think cautious to rake will ea: ;nil ITV 1,-.llth in It, tatival Item tecedent denial, arid fobfequent approbation, could from the Committee, with the Marquis of Lanfdown, not be fufficient to warrant a future denial, where no and twenty - fever others ; nor was the meetings to llt tear With t he molt &Untie ;ha I itsbfe.sx awren, ar, your much ob' sod humble r ew...,, orders for that denial were given. numeroufly attended as formetly. Lord ELLENIOROVGH laid, if a perfon eirprefred Mr. Scrjeant S rrrrrr o contended that the De• his approbation of adenial made of him, and fo went fendant had been duped to lir the beard. The lat on de die in diva, keeping his dwelling houfe to difap- ter had been folicited in contribute his vocal Ili 1 pum l l 7 :l 4 - . r . m ar e. the public ci b r e ' n ; . ' *:t l) l l , l ,i 'C r 'c : . ol et t l' -u .ar : - Piling. 2... R. ; tha.,c. , but leave you to . a as yn‘:r own ;1-.7.4 :* a d z b L e t b = point his creditors, it unqueftionahly was equal to an arta, and had been deceived by the new regulation i to pared and sot tby !-.• S .1 , Proprietor, T exprefs order on his part to he denied. . •ones TATLOS, enteted into refpeaing the meetings. After the 1 i 1 ;0 6 : ? :: N if ,... : .i bi 1e . ,.. / d t :? ..41 - , 1 1 ,,t - ' l :: , ‘ •'‘... a , ,1 1. :',..::: ,Is enevh ritce, i ! , ol: o 7 l ,aftaa , r , a t L i ai h r.m i . Houle, Mr. PARRS maintained that it was neceffary to Marquis of Lanfdown and other Noblemen had with- , Chew that the abfence or denial had been with the in- drawn, the Dere edant thought the (mitts' chffolved, 1 the Cure of Ve-LI i'..11:‘,,H; 1 ,, ;Üb e rh a t r 7n . viorave Feeney tent to iiilappoint or delay creditors. He had, how- and did net attend. The Lamed &leant tepee- whias men , H h s foot te.ei le ere; I:‘, A is c:A.rve. he ewer, ever, got out of the principal witnefs for the Plaintiff tented the latter to be a Gentleman of great prefet. hunfelf. the ad ,, r , snl ..ttitthmee• he i r.LLti: , no:g seraihater. to that Mr. D. was exitaly in the fame Bate in which he fsonal merit, but not ovet burdened with money ; h e D ut r " l ' i n c • 7 . 1 " ,, n g .,,1 t , h " t 1 !!' i... i , j're; will toe riirrmra, by a ehtle s eries had reprefented him to be immediately prior to the had an imniente quantity iii notes by him, but very eommitDon of bankruptcy. long prior to the debt of few were Bank notes; the Jury we uki therefore be shots tui liv A io l g w nta .k d ' i:t h . ,l' : , r h - i , a . • %' o 'l-' , " l% o ,:r .t'- ; ' u 'ri ni t' a l r if ? . :, I N ; I ,, 'n' d i e ; " : " lt. :l Al %n ban " : •... 1 the petitioning creditor. The Learned Counfel then tender in that point, and, if the objeflinn. entered I fltect, Pall-Mall; te. 1 tt-fee. No iol, 0)..-7,;-fteret; Mr. offered to adduce Mr. Stuart, the petitioning eredi• into could not be done away, they would give trivial Pill ''''',, l ,',..Si :i ,i !,;:' .17,:,,,',;; - ti ": ll, M m r.;• w ... tf r., or nnah .s. so '' , , i , i t l: tor him:ell, to prove that it was a collutive corn- damages. million. Sir J. MAll%l'lll.O was of opinion the Defendant . p t‘ .., " ...1 g , c. A 6Z 1r. A id rit ' m' ' f l ns ; C ? :, it ikl .L a - nr o l ' tt ' r l ; ju aii t dimh;;AnnfiPitlierfn,gnein.' I-7.er'; Lord Entre anenuort Paid the bankruptcy didnct was liable for the fifteen guinea s paid to the fubiti. iN o muterehle Toni) in Grey-W.-dr end Ireland, .r. Bowe proof roll nn that 4e Anne : Mr. Ginga's calling and Mr. ,lutes for thole üby were abfrnt, but that the fix gn i. , u .:4 9 l:: : ::t h,,,,fcak hr d s ,,,p r. w t it c h, :r O e ll ibt. and .fa p t ain ... l . ),-,,,.i ry n e ,s ir w ed bc . crbi si . P. being denied to him was net now the que3b.m.— I neat, which the Dcrendant and the others would ha' e , era „, , ,,,d g e ,„, y. 130:h the feels of Mr. 1). having abfented himfelf received if they 1144 performed. Mould be dednete ! from his !Mae, and having !laid at home and flint The Jury, thereinre, inund a vetdift for the Plat himfeli up from his creditors, by each of which be tiff—Damages, Aim Como. • L . N ri % ODON enit rk' t.) I.t v• . F.M l aol Lao ` to-'--ry•pisce. Lan.beth). at ay. STAR 011 s• •• No. r. Cusp girc , ‘• it.i6istbsdallogttbe•9reta Ur NC ArPee4llli PQLME. M A NSION Firms s.—Wcineftlay 75L. Craw , , Vert in the :mule of Williams and D. y, Banket•,ib er r . chin.l4ne, ye as fully commired by the Lord Ki)fir to take his trill, charged with dealing from that boufe, a rayerfitam flank Note r f sol. It appeared from the evideree of feverabsitoetres, that die notes , of this Bank are payable at Millis. Williams, where ' this note had been regularly paid, and afterwards Bolen. It was paid a fteond time to a Waiter of an eating . houfe in Finch-lane, Ceenhill, silos raid he was fent with it by the pi if ner, and gave him the change received for it. The change being found in the mi. loner's potreffion, he conferred 1-i , guilt, and when he found he was to be committed, pleaded hat d rot furl givcnefs, on the ground of having a wile mud three children. The panics were bound over to profecute. Saturday --- Loss was ecdnmitted from Hatton Garden o(sce, for fwindling. Urder preteoce that he was in the mercantile line, and wanted a confider able export of goods for the Canaan:4 teveral per, Inns were inibieed to givehim credir, to the amount of many hundred pounds. Some of the goods had been Upped, but were flopped at Graveread. A few even'ogi fine the warehnufe of Mans Newfun, in Theobald's-read, Red Lion-fiptare, was broke open, when twelve bt ass of candles, a quantity of co:ton yarn, &c. were taken away. SWINDLIMG.—On Wednefd4y fenn;ght a man, of genteel appearance, called on blelrrs. Lem and Lee, of Woreeller, pretending he was recommended to them by a refpeEtable houfg in Birmingham, srp purehafe of them •a•qu.ntity of gloves to fend off immediately to America, and produced an accepted draft of 671. with reveral indorfements upon it, which he left as a fecurity for the goods. Some forpicioni, hint, vet, ariting, a pertnn was fent Over to Binning. im to inquire if the draft was regular ? when the whole proved a forgery. The fame evening he cal -1 led upon Mr. Pacer ' filkelaee manufedurer, to in) quire if he would purelsafe any hofrery, or exchange the fame for lace ; but Mr. P. having intimation of I the former traniaainn, contrived to amufe him till • Officers were procured to apprehend him: and thus was this daring attempt frufiratedi He bats fines been committed. MATH. On Monday morning Taft, the lady of PIMP Lloyd Harris Efq. of Nibley Houk, of a ton and heir. .. MARIO CD. On Wedocfday loft, at Southampton. Lynch Cotton, Efq. of the syth I.ight Dragooas, to Mila Robbins, daughter of John Robbins, Pk. of that place On the ayth alt, at Edinburgh, the Rev. Rebut liorebtod. third foe or the late William Morehead. Efq. of Heebertlislre. to Mile Margaret Wilion, daughter of the decuakd Dr. C. Wiliam, Prr felfor of Church 1-tiftory iu the tinivcrflty of tt. Andrew's At sligo, Sir Robert Gore Booth, of Llfidell, to Ms Irifo, dnoghter of Henry Irvin. of Woodville, Efq. I•LIGHTV4IOIIR — AT - LONDON gfoenlrg •• • ' • • 46 Pdostio Act S Me moos • •• • 4 oilmen after AAVING dedicated mytelf to the lied,, and bct ratified by the MDR eonademble preake In that bemell whir': I thought 'raper to aloft, I um* the: I here not elms mlj employed my time thin thole val.e. In the eztenfivr ficid A the profeThen, are ‘..c.co`inr, ,, lly tramerfel In uneertutety, ebd sasses zic aye attain t:•st twee. • .deli is acquired by eeeeeatradug tba power to oue clefs of difarders TLe :Weeks of arc tieeulbsty dftrditng. raft they bring with them a train of concomitant freyteett.aed,: rs yate: prr.ittin of all vital mazy, enfience Well becomes embl Whether they &rife front the prevalence oft example, amalgam. tint habits of reboot hays, or the Indulgences el mateda7, they it. vibe the nroft al u^w 'wit-lona &ILI; but by the tgemsee• of etteduettedir ea, the 'power:sere aggravated. and dm deter cotton Is tiefiroyei. Asa M/IM SYR of the ROYAL COLLRORti CtCrI 1. I round my pretertfione oo regularity M edemas*: ma= every privilege tit gosetacc I feel =yid( made io that with whit! 1 have 1 d.-eo been Col:beret bottomed. in the Ant feefrelone of keel *mince. early' appicatim prevent the calamity of a deSilltated fuss; but where det-heat fora, from a rook-loaners of the tuunanlicas of Me Yee wide! caufeei his mitten's*, Is fearful of the contempt or cloture of bid fondly pbyfielan and broods over his hArmity cartage ism =taunt. it mail be fans'adery for him to be affixed not only of capalibity of treatment but ado of the aloft Inviolable fears* And in recent Varela Complaints It Is polibicto prevent paha. danger at &tree ;In the molt complicated cafes it is tb pine man of cectalve experience in this hoe to MIMI a fah, MOW; me I teal megtahattbmeat I AM the advan:age of this ceperlmze to thole of atber fee who ere aillidted with any Sind of DEWLITY, of any fymptonis A YENKREAL L141 , 11CT10,14, and to ail cafes the tame of nnewe aeretion are fisted on the firft Interview. Pottenta tNe country are sapceed to !nacres lank note, ad are tegeofted to (pacify their age and manner of Rang. MARTIN NUE, Member of the anal Collike of Surgeons la Loader Ho se. Asundel•ftree, :•t-and. Wei Temple Bar NUI 0