Star. — London, England, 1809-03-11 00:00:00

t.ise and inquiry. The Honourable Member should have mentioned, in its proper place, that many of Mrs. Clarke's notes were underwritten tt burn this," &c. and that theretere she had no right to expect that they would be brought either against or for her. There was one remaining topic, on which the Hon. Member wished to say a few words. The House was no less the guardian of the public liberty and laws than of the public morals • and it was impossible, after the s cenes which had lately. been discovered and placed be fore the public eye, that the House should puss lightly over so great an infringement of mondity in one of the public's greatrst Officers. This should not be cur sorily glanced at, but should form one of the consti tuent parts of the Address the House should submit to his - Majesty. tfrekw -all the circumstances, the Hosioui able Member did not conceive it possible - that the Commander in Chief could any longer remain an tisefillServant of the Country: It was said he might reit - win : this the Honourable Member heartily wished, and of this it did not become the House to despair. The Honourable Member then - animadverted upon the Duke's letter to the House. It was usual, hi sail, when his Majesty condescended to communicate with the House, to address to him an anr.ver, which was -a tnefe echo of his speech; but the Honourable Member hoped that the House would not pay the same compltment to his son ( Hear, kear, hear!) whose letter • had ventured almost to prescribe to them the conduct which they should pursue. In the Aenendmerit which the •I -lon. Gentleman sheill.l pri•pose, he should retain the ni igi ial para graph of . the Hon. Gentleman's (Mr. Wardle's) Ad chess, and conclude with moving, as an Amendment to the Right Hon. Chancellor of the Exchequer's 4ar4ndrneat, that the whole should he omitted except the word " and that the words " An humble 4.4lwsS be presented to his Majestyr sliduld be in poked. •If, upon the division of .the House, the Ho pburable Gentleman should gain this point,- 'mated that this Resolution would be to the foldin g effect : " That an humble Address he presented to his Majesty, humbly stating, that information had been con/monk-v.4d to them, and that evidence had been examined to prove, that various corrupt practices and abuses•leatilor a long time existed In ,the different departments of the Militery Administration; and that the evidence which had bee, given had been entered upon the records of ?ornament 1 thaebis Majesty's faithful Commons bad moo carefully examined the evidence, not only of the witnesses produced at their bur, hut also of the vAitten and official docu nteuts ; and that it was witkethe utmost concern end astonish meat, that they felt therinelves obliged to state, that the result of their diligent and laborious inquiry was such as to satisfy them h at the existence of those cerrupt practices to a very great extent IVAS fully established, at the same time that they assured his Ma jesty that there were no grounds to charge his Royal Highness the Commander in Chief personally with aoy participation in that corruption; but while the; admired the salutary regulations which his Royal Highness had introduced fur the benefit of the army, they felt themselves obliged to express their opinion that ale... abuses could not have existed without exciting the suspicion of the Commander In Chi, f; and, under all the circumstances, to sugp•st, whether the commatni of the army could, with propriety, be continued in the hands of his Royal Hightles4 particularly since the evidence of their inquiry has unveiled•a conduct IA his Royal Highness itighiy injurious to the chaise of religion and the wain sp. - laas of social order." Mr. YORIC.E. observed, that the distinction taken by ti - e last. speaker, appeared to him to be one of the eriou l atraordinary that he ever recollected since he had the honour of a seat in that House. He felt the . _ specting the Duke's conversations with Mrs. Clarke but --when it was considered that not one of these proceedings were in themselves improper They would have taken place without greatest confidence that the House would come to ain every instance Oat- improper, 7 - _ ....., taken p, comsciattions decision hn the subject, which was one that she was the constant comeeinion of Mrs. Clarke I the interfarence of Mrs. Clarke. . There was nothing of the must important that had lotion under the cog- he meant no imputation against her morals on • that improper or detrimental to the public in doom— nizance of Parliament within his memory. There account, for the nature of the relationship between 1 Bit his Honourable Friend said she had an interest in . were many Members, who, in their capacity of ma- them would justify their associating), that she had advancing these promotions. How did it appear ? gistrates, must have acquired a very comrotent know- been often relieved by her, surely it could not be too Was it from the letter respecting General Clavering's ledge of the principles of the laws of evidence, and it much to presume, that she would not hesitate to shew I application. It was very mound that, between a was upon these principles only that they could decide her gratitude and attachment by endeavouring to Lady and a Geotlemen living toget'oer on the terms respecting the credibility of the evidence they had serve her friend on an important occasion. It was i these did, such a cemmenication might take place, heard at their Bar. That House he would -always impossible to find the Duke of York guilty upon such I without any corrupt view whatever. - Mrs. Clarke consider as the representative body of the empire ; evidence as her's. He would however admit, that it said at the B:no that she had between fifty and sixty tins!, though there might be occasions in which it was probable some conversations might have taken i letters of the Duke at York, and yet this was the may be proper to refer to popular opinion, yet he was 'dare in presence of Miss Taylor ; for the Duke had only instance in their conespc.ndowe re hive to mill certain they would never sacrifice their own dignity goott confidence in Mrs.. Clarke, not knowing that tary promotion. He was aatonishod, therefore, the and justice to any popular cry. He felt confident, she came out of Cogilvites hand!. It was impassible Honourable Member should assert, that it was clear therefore, that the ultimate decision of the House indeed, on the terms ihat this man- and woman were, that the - Duke of York was in constant habits of coin- • woula be satisfactory to the public. There were two that the Duke of York should not have placed great. masuicating with Mrs. Clarke on military matters, questions before the House. The first was, whether confidence in her in matters relating to his own pro- whee there WAS only one solitary instance ia which it. his Royal Highness the Doke of York was implicated fession. He must admit, that such confidence did appeared to have token place ;if there was, the io these transactions of personal corruption or corrupt take place,. but the expression did not imply that House' might be assured that either Mrs. Clarke or cennivance A question week! arise upon this, es to rit related to any corrupt practices. ' the /*neural - do Member who preferred the charges whit the proceedings of the House should be. The With respect to Tonyn's care, the only circumstance against his Royal Highness, would not have neglec second question was, olietlicr, even in the suppoeition that connected it with the Duke of York WAS the note ted to avail themselves of such' documents. As to of his Royal Highness being acquitted of corruption which had been found in Sander's possession. not it Dr. O'Meara, it was to be lamented that the Duke, or criminal participation, there was net sufficient evi- was eery doubtful on the face of it, whether that note I on such a recommendation, should . have interfered deuce 'before the Committee that his conduct had been was written by his Royal - Highness or not. So much . for this man, or made use of the expression that he incorrect, and was therefore liable to censure ? These doubt, indeed, had he about it, that he could not re- , did respecting him. No such connection should have two questions, in hi s opi n ion, embraced the whole of concile his mad to believe that it was, and that it re- existed. - He must agaiit recur to Tonyn's note. - Ile the proeeediags befiess the House. The Address toted, - as changed, to a criminal transaction. He rat could not consider it as hiffecting 'the Duke in the moved by the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Wardle) related then believed that it had been finehred by Mrs. Clarke .! smallest dtree. In his opinion, there was no proof to the first question ; the Amendment proposed by for the purpose of defrauding I onyn e through the before the House that could warrant it to inflict so his Right Hon. Friend to the second. That Amend medium of her agent Sanden. No one who coast- : heavy a ptinishment upon his Royal Highness as his . mint proposed to lay aside any Vote of an Address, sidered the abandoned character of this woman could; removal froni the command ef the army, whatever but to ceme to certain Resolutions on the most mate- hesitate to believe that she did not seize onevery thing censure it might an its wisdom, determine to pass on vial part of the coo. The first of these Resolutions within her reach, with the rapacity of a harpy. Many . him. The object of the Address as well as of the pr ee sed, indeed. to conic to a (EStinCt vote on the Gentlemen, well acqoaintod with Various hands, Amendment, seemed to be to remove the Doke from subject. The object of the second Amendment (that whose business it was to detect forgeries, and in which the command of the army. • If he were brought to prep see by Mr. Bankes) was to srt aside the proceed- they sheaved themselves very clever, had doubts •as , the necessity of agreeing to such 'an Address, 4s Ull irg 'r. Reeution, and i esti ae the neighed Address. to the note being the band-writing of the Duke. In- doubtedly he was not, he should still eetremely de- This, lo nelint deed, ws he the effect of it ; fur, deed, any Mealier, who took the trouble of carefully' plate such a circumstance, as affecting the ioteresta, eleeigh liie sesood Ameedment lola original Address examinine. Mrs. Clarke's letters, would perceive that the discipline, and the feelings of the army. .Much ;tepee ed to be ilia . .. Tent in some points., yet, in oil). they contained a basis for a facility_ef imitating the had been said of die danger - of placing the Princes at stance, they to.•tr precisely the semi.; as he would be I Duke's hand ; and there were two short notes of his the head of any establishments, on account of their able to !near preoently. 'lie w(ollii ant ascribe to the Royal Higheess, in particular, which she might make . not being responsible. But Look at the military his- H o no ur ebh. Member who hid just sot-down. any in- use of as autographs to counterfeit the Duke"s writ- tory of the country, and it would be foeed that the tention of embarrassing the proceedings of' the House, ling. But snppoang it was written by the Duke, • army never was in such getai condition as when tw in order to render them dialeult and intricate; but if might it not have ratted to some other Tonyn, or Princes were at the head of,it. This suns the case in he did, he certainly could In.; have adopted a n y p r o- to sonic circumstance respecting this same Tonyn the time of 'King William, who was himself a jot -1 ceeding hct:cr talcolateA to attain such an object than other than his promotion ? It was impossible to give ( Per, and who managed the Whole of it with the as that which he he i ;List submitted to the House. It l up any pereen to censure and punishment on such sistance. of • Mr. Braithwaite. It was also the case loos intricate zed. cemplicatesi to the last degree. . Tu• i evidence. On Carter's case he would say but little,. when the army as under the coemoond of the Duke stead of the Ilense having to decide u po n . the e r iga 1. ! as any imputation against Ms Royal Highness on the of CuMberlandOin the war of the succession, when it red proceedine. eaniely, the Address thev w ou ld have i subject of his promotion seemed to be given up by all ties crowned with eternal glory by the vi c tory of to detetmine Lass en the two Amendments. He l e- 1 sides of the llousto There was great reason to Minden, and 41i: names of Townshend and others que sted the ioduleence or to e otre. oe , w hil e h e b r i e fl y I suppose, that the Duke knew he was the son of Cap- . were rendered illustrious under the Councils of Lord o adverted the et iiierce thev had heard at their bar. tain Sutton, and it is possible that he may have at- Chatham. In addition to these instances, there was . ?t appeared a. m this that :qrs. t Take haAlived with I tended Ins person. But his Royal Highness had. the army formed b)' the Duke of . York, than which the Duke of Yorl.for about two y ears and a half, and I shown, that he had always been very anxious about there could not be' a better. • No. Juan would deny it. was made .a • i urge against his Royal Highness, ' the character of the army, and that he was ,careful that it Was equal to any in Fenspe. This the coon this . dorieg tho time she it h er a e ents had engaged that no improper persons should intrude into it. It try owed to the indefatigable zeal and application of i n as oe.etloi sestein of corruption relating ti pro- war; one of the chief and first objects of his care,when the Duke of York.. It was impossible, therefore, not nio.,cns M !he ;Irmo, and other appoint meess. Tos he took the command of the army; the character of to deplohe that such a n o te s h ou ld h e removed front war 7. t . ' roishfie or end of IS(.(i, ias Royal Highness which was far different now from what it was when it, and. that the command -. should be placed in the e.irt with this \semen, and it was to the was put at the head of it. 'With regard to Shaw's hands eta person or per s ons, 'he would. not say, not --. tI toiots iotutti by ateply rtr t truted that he bad not e( ,m, to thi s re , scitLion mod - , sooner. I.'hese ccrinpt tr-ns,tetions : di •efore have occurred in the l interval betweeti - • - appointment, he should not det.iin the HOuse a , mo- fit for it, but cettainly not so fit as his Royal -High mem on it. There was no irregularity imam); instance neii.• One Word l 'aS . to responsibility. Could any relating to kiii:wks placed on the half pay as a one say fluke Wit not resp msible ? ViTAat MUM . tiWreiOre 11c1V C wus...• • • . • • • ..ok abe b eg i nn in g of 180 aild the period- that 4tie wirs nattefof-contse.. • The . ' peocilled ndte, In niucti ad- was he now—(l-(1 1 1 , 0r !).—Was he not now • • - . . . discarded. It appeared also front the evidence, that sisted, on, aid not retard his apteeintreient ,fee &Aw e ' his Royal Highness had a great affection for this un-'s so c k; ''"lt 'didnot 4 peer; Vogl 0e : 4041.6=4' 4 . to s t y th e pp ria. liy of She neglect that was imputed . :i 414 1—: 11‘14441 1 she es e :upt . i 'llii n of gi w gh h t ie l 7i li n t: t a t -: eal acc i t ej ,e, l l l 7 fortunate woman, and that he placed unlimitedtione Ciddiel Cordon's i t ee, - that Ay letter had been &fence in her. The testimony of this Woman was the etrei . seihtei;. of whiththis presufaed rejection of his. _ln the four VanSaCt loll6 m'flich 'sere brought f oreara chief support or the different charges that were pre- proposal was the basis.. The - next case was ,tha f t of there "Vas not, :be would contend, the smallest pe e k ferred. Now, for himself, he would say, that lie Dowler; and here 'R . must say there was -no et-edit o f personal cerru.peiou or corrupt Ni A nd would give no credit ehatever to the testimony of whatever "due to the testimony of this Man. For so absolVed, skas he to he re*e.Yed from his am. Mrs. Clarke, as infecting the Duke of York, except y ear s he had - been the Favourittrftour of Knit: mand'aorhi:tiled with indignity, because a arr o w where it was corroborated by ot hers. She had the Clarke, long before'she came to live with the Duke, - cry had bmi industriously raised w e ep A w ra ?..... strongest motives for endeavouring to destroy the cha- He had expended considerable sums on her, at/dem- Was it . becoming the diguity of de:House n u t a ratter of the Duke. Wounded pride—the fallen and thing was more likely than that he should have 'hid ' mean and slavish deference to this pop u l ar cry _ adopt em barrassed state in which she was—revenge, and recourse to this stratagem to get 1001)1. out of old Mr. (lewd cheering)—to t he Resolution p roposed? that fired hate; which, when it once takes root in a Dowler, for the purpose-of eirpepdieLit on this wo-. .—to humour this most ineensideeite and unj ust t e e female, breast; is hardly to be satiated, urged her . man. It eras proved that they were te . the habit of positiviii,. o circuleted With 4 repinity and m oi gne , on, and produced those various contradictions. in- draWing- bills on etude other, and one of theses t° the quite incouceivalle.? lt was natural tha - .. the p ee , I. her'' evidence,- which ;tripped it . 01 all •credit. It , amount of 3001. was discounted at-Parker's, .and re- eho - 41- compleio.ofe; .many occasions, and it e • e , -, was not .* ibles that-attr - rnan; who was not tin- i mined unpaid to this day. 'There was no doubt*. 'fitting that the limit* should sympathize ~ /ii h , . . • prejadiced by something extraordinary ! his mind that the application in favour of Dolt ; them ; .but, this . eras a .. . IllfillaAlt that was me a:, in the manner or habits of that woman.: woldd be.. W came from Sir Brook • 'atson. It appeared froni e w i le t° be . 9 induloed. The peoPleyere never lo n e ' , Heim What.she si4d, if it was uneorroboratecl . by other :. correspondence with the Treasury, that thtee ciii of .iit-discoverieg tneir errors, also experience proved t h a t testimony, There was one eireninstance ill this' evi- ' the five,Assistant Commissaries for which he applied' they felt an extraordinary gratitude to those sri m deuce nothitherso adverted to. It would seem, from had been recomthended by Mee. tbis presumption were . the means of involving or continuink them in het representation, that she was a married woman, was corroborated by Dewier himself . ; ; fee in his con- : the. wrong path. Let the House speak out neinf e e y who had been seduced from her husband by his Royal versation with an Hon. Meinher - of the 1-feusei (Al- ,pa say if t Was.not.preiared to tesist this Add re , s Highness. The fact was, that she had previously ; derrnan Combe), he said that lie was persuaded he 0b..: to remove_the Duke of )(LW Irons the command o f lived with Mre Ogilvie, or he lived with her, an army i tainedlds appointment through Sir Breok Wetiori.l the army, asswelle4 tlie — POinlir cry, which, by else agent, who afterwards became a bankrupt, and from ' He should say no more respecting the criminal part ; fell from the fl pourable Gentleman, he must con s i. Whose hands she came, deeply versed in all the myse l of the transaction. If the Duke wished to make e i.det: as the foundation of it. • teries of army-jobbing,. to the Duke of York. In thii': profit of his patronage, had he tot 'hundreds of .en; 1 . On Mr. YORKE's sitting down, a number of school, a woman of - her talents Could not but have., ogncies and cornetc:es every year at his disposal which) Members rose to deliver their sentiments, and a cr y made great proficiency in thatseience, which • she so . ; he might have turned to account ? The sale of these] ot Jeveral names, Hear, hear: .Ord-r,mykr; pre. dexterously and 7SUCCeaftllirg%ltsed, while under I might have prcidu6ed him thousands, if he' was. base ; vaiTad fora considerable time. the protection of his Royal Hi According to i and mean enough to endeevour to derive advantage ; 'ilte SPEAKER .having mentioned the Gool e , her account, it was not till:4oooe'dint . after the-estab- i from the power of disposing of them. Was it to be ; man who first catight_his eye, • • lishment it Gloucester-place WWI set up, when she f s u pposed then; that he' would em t iloyethie Woman in j Me. LEACH could not bring himself to concur in discovered that the allowance was not sufficient to .1 tilts abominable traffic for the sake of a feW hundreds ? ; either of the - Address:A for the removal of the . D u k e maintain it, that she felt herself under the necessity.of i He would say one word more respecting French's , of York. - There was no evidence against hint of mr . taking upthis system. Nutlet Gentlemen examine the I levy. - The expence of it did not exceed 414 per.man; i ruption-or participation. Mrs. Clarke, in his (phew, minutes, and there they' would find it in evidence, that I a very reasonable price considering the d Acuity of : was not entitled to the smallest credit, in ane instuee the proposal for - French's . levy was made on the Ist l obtaining men at tit it time. It did not, in fact, costa in whiCh it washer interest to deviate from . thetxute,' ~ of February, 1804, before the establishment at Glou- as much as other levies that were on foot.—He would She,had, in the course of her esramination,repeates4 eester-place Was set up, or just-as it had commenced. now examine the second question. The question was, contradicted herself, and she was, mereever,.centra. in fatt, she began to put her knowledge in practice, supposieg the Duke of York to be guilty of the cri- dieted belanimeet'reble:teldeisce. e She was contra. before, by her own account, she became in the least minal transaction,-what was the prociedinif to be .clicted by Mr. Knight, particularly with respect to a embarrassed. Was he not justified in saying that, taken ? The Address left every thing undefined; it conversation that, had taken ,place a few days before this woman came out ofsMr. Ogilvie's bends well - ac- asserted nothing, and he n - sisted the House would not she appeare d at tie Bar cif that House. She was also quainted with all the mysteries of military services? agree to it. If the Duke of York was criminal ' 6 contradicted by an Hom Member (Mr. Wardle) re. The application from Sanden and French .must have not send him to trial at once ? why not impeesh lees . spectiag her having seen him on the clay preceding her been before she went to reside in- Gloucester-place.— before his Peers of *high crimes and misdemeanors? .first•etatifusation: - -On the \Vednesday she peremp. Would any one believe what she said respecting; her If he was found guilty by that tribunal, •Parliament , torily asserted that she had not seeti the jrion.hlenibtr distresses having arisen some months after she had Gould 'not go too far. It would k the daty of both :tt all on the Tuesday. when it was proved that she 'come to Gloucester-place) It was proved, by her t lima of Parliament to bring in a Bill - for Air exclution had seen him no less th an duce times, and that he connection wi th Sanden and 'French, that the story from the Throne IHe had no hesitation in saying, that,. had even rodeipher carriage with her. She was also of her distress was invented to bolster up that fact. if he was guilty of these practices, he never ought to contradicted I'4 - Mr. Ellis, respecting her visits to With respect to what she said on the subject of sit upon the throne. This was the Constitutions Law Mrs; Favorite. She stated, that during the whole thee French's levy, the Honourable Gentleman whosspoke of the Land. It was the penalty of apostatisingfrom; the latter was in that Gentleman's service, she Called est said it was strongly corroborated by the terms of the established Religion of the State. • The -brilliancy upon her but once, andehat was in a hackney-coach. the levy itself, and the evidence of Miss Taylor. Now of the Crown would be tarnished, the ermine that de- They had the evidence of Me: Ellis, that she had cal with regard to Miss Taylor, he had a very strong sus- corated the Royal robes would be sullied, if a Prince led repeatedly on Favorite, or Farquhar, as she was picion on his mind, whether any credit was due to so disgraced should ever be destined towear them. .It then called; that she stai3 in hiitir at a time, and that her evidence. There were many contradictions in it, was impossible that a Prince, convicted of such prat; they were so familiar, that he concluded they were and particularly in what she had said respecting Mrs tices,. could sit upright upon his throne, or look his ,-sisters, ornery near relatives at least. He might refer Favourite. She had stated that she never recollected people in the face. These would be the coosequences of. to this head of contradiction what she had said re- Mrs.- F. went by the name of Mrs. Farquhar. He I acceding to this address. With respect to the undue in- specting Dowler. She-stated at the Bar of the House, [ would put it to the House , whether such a circuits- fl uence said to be exerted over theCommaoder in Chief, e chet see had only seen Dewier tier a few minutes, stance could have been unknown to her ? When it the extent to which it was exercised, he thought that ; on i when, as it appeared afterwards, , she bad passed appeared that she was wholly devoid of memory, re- . a fair aamination of the evidence, it would appear whole night ' with him at Slaughter ' s coffeelotee, _ . _ _ , _ _ _ _ --'lv ' where the represented herselfae h's wife. What credit Jere u,. _ could be given to the evidcace of a woman of her de- seription, — . convicted of such repeated prevarication wed falsehood Though he was convinced, that a s tigular note respecting Tonyn was written by the Duke, and was reudy.to allow, - that so far it exhibit. ed proof of his Royal Highncs'.'s .permission o£ her iiiterference, sill it furnished not the sligleest proof of a corrupt menive. With respect to Miss Taylor s evidence, he was not disposed to deny, slut the patti• mar conversation which she hid stated to have passed in. her presence, between the Duke and Mrs. Clarke, had really passed : neveetheless, he would Contend, that k would not wan ant any unfavour able construction. The etpression so much clwek orlon, of " how dees he behave u you, darling i" meant no more than to inquire whether Col. French tweet/Mrs. Clarke, as he did the Duke, who was stated by Miss Taylor to have deck +red, that he himself %ea perpetually. teazed by Wes. Col. French, however, bed obtained his levy in the regular way. Bled! stress had been laid on the allegation ef each man (e . this levy having cost £150: that there was, however, e fall proportion of officers to the corps, had been d eluded from all c-nsideration ; the great charge t r the inert actually raised, arose horn the seethness of the number : and had it IXx•n ever so high, still theta was no mark of speeel favour to French, whese he; was. equal with that of the puhlic, he and bat ing sufnired to the amount of .CWX). Ac to M.:I 1 &ewe his appointment was plainly proved to le ,e been owing to Sir H. Burrard ; and a pIeVICUS ::!013:• meot had been made that he should go on hell-ray ; the 'neaniamion itsef was peelectly proper. Ie ie. jected both to the Address and Resolotions, leeeie he saw no reason for parliamentary interfereece if either shape. It had been said that every Monk' must do his duty, he (Mr. Leach) knew no other r way! rot. them to do their duty, than to examine dv roughly the evidence, and to pronounce an hVirMt judgment upon it. Celle n prepnssession s perha es have been finened by the public ; hut the pahiic knew that these prepossessions must heft .rined iteperfert evidence, for the full evidence was only befere Members of the House of Commons. All that just and rational of the.public would wait ter the e • cisien el the House. Len' FOLKSTONE rejoiced diet he lied given way to thee Learned Gentleman, because it gave hiin an opportunity of replying to the arguments whichte had le..eight forward. But Wine he should n: w:!at had fillen from that Learned Centic:nan , shoeld bey a word or two upen what bed been urged by the Right Honourable Gt.n opposite (M:. Yorkel. With respect to what had been Axed h! the Right Honourable Gentleman on the tiocr, wit 3 reference to the proceeding prepesed by the 1-hinour• able Gentleman (Mr. Banker), he would refer to the explanation given by that, Honourable G,.ntiania, which sheered that it was neither intricate nor diffce. The Honourable Gentlerhan who prripoeed that pri ; )• ceeding, had explained its nature in a kw wor. and fully demonstrated to the satisfaction o f the Ho i that the course he recommended was neither invo.red in intricacy , nor embarrassed with dieiculty. It ells t ,, is perfectly wear, that.no question co:thi ac. regularity, 'and he was confident that no doubt cor.4 be eageTr.ained 43 to its prop s Tl:c rrowt% Neat the_l - lonoorable Gcogesnaii assigned for tlic , era 4, oght Pr e r ee oft, • *. ll t bab it: - conne ct ' deek 4e4 beit!the.' 16 s 1 to 1 " d e fees 4 od o fMS sl ought t' be cool( t hat the of his A other I fur.suPl to meet was cal of this iatende co attei b e ted, friends , House' p u blic be , l ll l He ea wile& cfhl, jouro tiott Henan bound Metnht reconni itoprop noorabi under lc L. peal to a duet, f • she* tl O goad t that an: • of his". tr ben at 1 C boriini>' Bar brfrin to were I td ott4erri h. Gentle skat , lic as cdoetti thiii fit TO btlktid re? erkld 3 ' 034 4 se, Got* CS, rat' I a untiOr liz hingc and As ie- that si ion r fortil t 3 It WaS the teftelic :Aises hzv proseci ocf pm% S i4tneh v:c dim ,tee 1:k tad or • try, an our- than ai eel tress P 1 partict • itch runt, Lted tvic v • Gentle er, man h welt pon c upon - var, house Ci- id Ste t r proven ;$ of Gentle here York. lays 2S was r kn i r all this not hi trcc questic ; Was Co- might eit he aid object; Geutk th able sr ,tart bars Amon new Oh? a had b e 11:3 come %et re t i • gard not Hit ivetl thej NA;points rh :to rece fa:ce cen t . 1 ) 1 T he 11 ',Ted the R e Point e , !ti wit:t re-.. d noun- It.toide .0 tl:e lion % 21:1 11 1 hNii c rxya t • erred erred 400 ▪ 4 % t th 01#0.1 itu Lc wo'stv inf t o is oci ' Ana rt.sa'th •