Star. — London, England, 1807-06-03 00:00:00

6 LAW INTELLIGENCE. --.- HIGH COURT OF APPEAL. ALOERADE.—CASE OF THE PETRIOTEN. (Conclueed from efterday's Paper.) Yeflc•day morning the Court met again, to pro. reed further in this important caufe. These were prefent—the Lord Chancellor, the Duke of Mont role, Earls Camden, Bather(}, and Clancarty, Lords Ilawkelbury and Mulg,ave, and the Matter of the Rolls. ..... . Sir j-hn Nicholls, the Icing's Advocate, was heard at confilerable lei gth for the refpondeuts, in reply to Dr. Lawrence, for the appellants. The Learned •Gentleman contended, that every thing that had b:en done by the refpondents was agrceoble to the law of nati , us. He agreed wilt his Learned Friend in Game points, viz. that it WAS ne celfar y to ascertain that there was a blockade—and alfo to atcer tain what constituted a blockade—bot he denied that it was recd . :Hy to have Inch a number of (hips to blockade a poll, as in the cafe of a Ise fieged town. He °bier ved, that it had been decided in that Court, in the cafe of tl.e Columbia, that a 114 grrittiog her port, and bound for a blockaded port, made her liable to confiscation. He contended that it was not necellary that any number of (hips fhould be fixed ni , rin to confli.ute a blockade, but that the number mint in all cafes depend upon the times and circurnll-nees. In the blockade, in this cafe, there was a large fleet, bur it was not neeeffary that they fluaild all be together ; they were diflributed in vari..tts parts. In tie cafe of Admiral Jervis and General Grey's Proclamation for blockading the Well India Mods, that was not held good, becaufe it was not acco-cpanied by any aft. The Government did nut allow of inch a blockade, without ufmg pro per mean, to enforce it. The Judge of the Admi ralty had very leniently fettled it, that a cargo was not liable to confiscation—when the mailer of the valet was a mere cattier. But that was nut the pre fent cafe—the cargo was cm.figned In the mailer, and he contended that the notification had been anted time enough for him to have known it before he had failed from his own pot t. He therefore prayed their Lordlhips' affirmation. The Court was then cleared, and their Lordfltips deliberated for upwards of an hour. On the re•ad rnillion of (bangers, the LOAD CHANCkLLOIL took a general view of all the circumilances of the cafe, and laid great filth Upon the mailer having unlimited power to hell the cargo. His Lordfhip read a trail.' flatirm from the French of the copy of the notice of , the bl , ekaele, lent by Lord Grenville, then Secretary sat State f r Foreign Affairs, to the Danifh and all the Foreign Minilters. He then took notice of the veffel beirg boar&d off the Fly Hand by the Prrifer. rine, and of the Lotice of the blockade being i idor fed on her papers, &c. This his Lot dfhip conlidered the bed petliblo evidence. His Lnrdti:ip laid, the 11 raid had tak.li Into Confider ation the queflions and points hated by the Connfel on both fides, and were of opinion, that a bh•ckade did exits at the time in outtrion ; that the ntrificatinn was duly given and properly abed upon—that the notification was pro perly given to the velfel in quaint), and that the was ',roper ty sc al nee! of it—that the detention of the Chip vas fully jr,tiitied ; and that the cargo nut being en. tinned to 11:c matter, meld) , as a cattier, was pro perly c:mfifcated. The Reg ilia- of the Admiralty then generally pro nounced their Lordlhips' affiturati.m. this caufe excited fu much intei cII in Doftot s' Commons,.that the Corn t was crowded with Junior Proilots, mull of whom ti ok notes. _ _ _ A drat number cf tattles of a fintilar nature, whit i have hen increariag for fervid years pan, ar e iu lOure &glee fettled by this &cilium COIJIIT OE KING'S BENC.TI, JUNE t. THli KING V. ROBERT WILLIAMS. On the fuggeflion of Sir VICARY GISIIS, the affida vits on both !ides were read, but thole on the part of , the profecution haying already been detailed before the public, we null only date fo much of them as may be rendered necelfary in order to give a complete view r t the cafe. The affidavit of William Kernys, Efq. dated that he was fr 'email of the Grand Jury for the County of Monmouth, :slid that on Monday, the ifith of March late, tfte Defendant, an Attorney of the Court, pre ferred an indicclment against Bottray, a Sheriff's Of ficer, for catorting money from a perlon whom he had :melted ; but before the witneffes were examin ed, the Grand Jury adjourned until (even o'clock in the evening, giving the defendant notice ; but when that hour arrived, upon inquiring for Mr. Williams, they found that he had dirmiffed his wionelles, and no more Wind's being under confideration, the jury returned that indictment as no bill, and were difmif fed by Mr. Baron THOMPSON. The affidavit of Mr. Charles Tomes, clerk of the indiClment, let forth a converfation between the De. porent and the Defendant, in which the latter laid, that he had, been Blamefully tiled with refpeCt to the indienreat which had been preferred by him ; that he and the witneffis had attended upon the Jury from the time of giving in the bid, until five o'clock in the evening, and further, that then he had been informed, that they would not he ready to proceed with bolt *net; until ten the next morning ; yet that they fent for him at feven o'clock at night, and defired his inmledinte attendance, but that his witnelles were lent home, and that the Grand Jury then went to the judge's lodgings, and were difcharged. He added, that he had no doubt but that the Jury aCted thus todefeat the obj:Ct of the indielment ; that it was a mo,l difgracelul and blackguard uplift/lion ; that he would punifh the authors of it, if par i bl e . He concluded by feying, that he,did not care who hard him, and that an attorney of the name of P.rilpot was at the bottom of it. The affidavit of James Bower, Ertl •ftated,that the Defendant, alluding to the Grand Jury, Paid, that there never was loch a let of blackguards. Mr. Howells heard the Defendant make rile of this ex prefilon :—" I do not know if it is in my power to pnni(h the Grand Jury, but if it is, I will certainly do it. I thought they came here as gentlemen, but they behaved like a let of blackguards." Mr. Black more was prefent when the Defendant obferved, that he would make the Jury know what they .had been about, for there never was a more blackguard pro. • ceeding. • The following teflimony was thee read agaitiff the Rule for Criminal Information : The affidavit of Mr. Williams denied that he had ever received information that the Grand Jury would proceed with bufinels at feven o'clock, but, on the contrary,that he was told that nothing would he done until the next morning, and he thetefore difmiired his witnefres, and defiled them to attend the Cowed ing day. In coniequence of being informed that he had forrae enemies on the pity, the Defendant de• tet mince, to be prepared, but at (even o'clock he was fent for, when all his Wiltieffes were gone ; and the Defendant was told afterwards by Mr. Houghton, one of the Jury, that previous to his being fent for, one of the Grand Jury oblerved, Now is the time to fend for Williams; I believe there are enough of us here to get rid of hi. bill." On the day following the difcharge of the Grand Jury, Mr. Williams propofed to lone late members of it, while they were at break fall, to proceed with the indiement ; but they re fufed, telling him that he lhould have been prepared before. This affidavit alto let for;h a letter, NVliLten, by a Mr. Philpot to a Gentleman named Stokes, in which the Defendant was termed a viper ; and it re commended the perfon to whom it was addrtiled to apply to thr It. Salufbury, and other Gentlemen, to ifeteat the objeft of the indietment. It concluded, by requelliag Mr. Stokes to burn this letter. The affi• davit admitted that the Defendant had fail, that the condo& of the Jury was moil dirgraccful and black guard. The affidavits cf Mr. Sttntighton, Mr. J. Howell, John Jones, J. Rudd, S. Tyler, W. Gwyllin, and Sarah Watkins, corroborated the Latta- contaitied in the afficlavi: of the Del:end:mt. Lord ELLENBORoUGH laid he wifhed, for obvious reafons, not to enter into all the particulars. which had been brought forward in mitigation of the cafe ay;ainfl MoWilliams ; to hear the affidavits of the Grand Jurymen themfelves as to what paired between then: when they were deliberating on a bill of india mcnt, was Bill more improper. The oath ofa Grand Juryman had in it this fentence—‘l the Counfels of., your Fellows, and your own, you will keep fecret." This affidavit might divulge thole Counfels—which, betides the general itttpiops4ety of the mcafure, might he attended by many inconveniences. Suppoie, for inliance, a perfon of charafter and confider anion in the neighbourhood was the fubjefl of the deliberation of a Grand jury, and the bill had been thrown out after inch a delibetati..,n, and that forne of the Jury men had been of opinion at fall, that the bill ought to be hound a title bill, but had been convinced by the reafons which were urged by others, that the bile ought to be rejetted, what might the coafequences be of publifhing the billory of the deliberation ? The, e was no knowing to what inch a praCticc might lead, or who might he prejodiced in his inter ell— perfons might be undone for what they had Paid in the honefl and conicientions difcharge of their duty as Grand Jurymen ; and therefore the Cr tin ought not to lav down a precedent for hearing on affidavit what paired i.etacett Grand Jurymen in their Cauncil Room—it would be uaini ety dangerouo I do not io r into the particulars of the cafe for vlavious reafons. r ffe Defendant admits, as every body mutt admit, that the language he ufed was improper, and his conduit culpable ; but, at the fame time, I do no; like to go into the examination of the conduit of others. That, at prefent, is the opinion of the Court; but if Counfel think they can alter that opinion, they may proceed with their arguments." The ATTORNEY GENERAL and Mr. GARROW de dined laying any thing. Upon which, after a con • lideration of the cafe, and a confultation upon the Bench, the Count ordered, that this Rule should be dricharged, but that Mr. Williams lhould pay the coos.—Rule di!charged. THE KING V. J , HN stir actooatcx. This cafe was called on for argument, and the quellion wa., whether an information in the nature of a writ of gte, warranio, lhould he filed againli the defendant, requiring him to thew caufe by what au. thotity he claimed to be a member of the common ally of the borough of Thetford ? The affidavits on which the motion was originally made by Mr. Wilfon, fel forth the conaitution of the borough, and Rated, that a meeting of the Corpora tion was fummoned on the 14. th of Januaty 18oz, when the rcfignation of the father of the defendant was received, and the Mayor, the Recorder, arid the C..roner, without any further nitice, adjourned to another apartment, aod immediately dated the de- fendant to the vacant feat in the commonalty. _ _ Mr. GAettow, in eppoil ion to the rule, contended that this pr , ceeding was per feelly regular. It was in evidence, that a meeting of the whole Cnrporate Body was fummone3, and that, after the refignation of one member had been acccpved, the fele& Body, whole duty it was, viz. the Mayor, the Recorder (the Duke of Grafton), and the Coroner retired, and in troduced the name i.f the defendant among the lift of the commonalty, with the concurrence of every party. The ATTORNEY GENERAL and Mr.Wicsou, on the contrary, infifted that fuch an elation was not only illegal by the common law, as laid'clown in the cafe of the King v. Carlifle (Lord Raym. 1355), but likewife in oppofition to the eflablifhed cullorn of the borough of Thetford; for it was fworn on the face of the affidavits, that it had been the invariable ufage to give a fepaxate notice of the meeting of the fele& b'dy kr the appointment of one of the Commonalty. The Court deferred giving any decifion, that they might have an opportunity of I ,okiog more minutely into the cafe of the King v. Carlifle. LINTON V. PHIPPS. The siltation in this cafe was, whether the Plain tiff's Attorney, of the name of Edward Rulhworth, Humid not pay the Defendant his coils, and likeuile anfwer the matters contained in the affidaiits. The affidavits charg d Mr. Rulhworth with mak ing ufe of the names of his dependants in commencing qmi tarn affirms againfl country Gentlemen, to recover penalties under the Game Laws. This practice had been followed with tel not only to the Defen dant, but to a Mr. Rowboddy and others. In the fuit againfl Mr. Phipps, Mr. Rulhworth had failed. the Plaintiff was taken in execution for the colts, and was now confined in Lincoln County Gail. The ATTORNEY' OEWRIAL and Mr. Torritto, againll the tale, produced the affidavits of Mr. Roth worth, the plaintiff, and Mr. Wake, directly contra. dieting every Itaternent on the other fide, denying that Mr. Rt.fhworth had any iotereltlin the tient of the trial, further than for his Colts. the Attorney for the plaintiff. . Mr. GA ::AW WAS prneeedit:a to reply to this ten drlony, ony, when he was flopped b y ' the CHIEF JUSTICE, who, on account of the lateners of the hour, deferied the conlideration of the cafe until to.roort ow. °SWAM AND OTHERS V. GIBBS Mr. PARK moved fora new trial in this cafe, upon the ground that it was necefiAry to have had a regif ter of the Chip by the builder, the defendant, upon the fide to the plefent plaintiffs. 'Fhc of f Ale pro duced was dated in June, and reci . ed a regiller by the pit efent plaintiffs at. Penzance, in Cornwall, about a month before, which, he laid, could not be go , d, bccaufe no transfer in a 'hip could be made except by bill of fale which (hould be regidered. 'lle Court held that upon the fir building of the fhip it was rot necclfary to make a regitler by the builder, but only upon the firfl fale of it, which was done here. Rule ~ifirclufed. GORDON v. SECRFTAN. The ATTORNEY GEN hAAL moved to fet afide the verdict obtained in this ;teflon, and to enter a nortfuit. It was an action o al'olicy of beim - mice upon a South Whaler taken by the Spaniards off the coati of Chili. The plaintiff recovered as for a total lois, which the defendant now obj:Eled to, 'Ton the ground that the owners . had not an it - Prairie interell in the whole Ship, inafmuch as they had entered in:o an agt cement wi 11 the Captain and crew to allow them, in lieu of wages, ne.thii d of the preceeds. Lard ELLENIV)ROUGH thought that the interefl i'l the Captain and the crew did n•.t afire till the Ihip's arrival in port, and that up to that vcriod the owners had an inlOrable interell in the v. hole t,f the ft ei•,;llt ; but he wets dilpefed to giant a rule w chew cable. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE z. lIVRNFT V. MIORF. The Plaintiff, a Stationer and Newfman, fought to recover againft the Defendant, as the acceptor of a pt ()miff try note for 51. SS. given in the year x 792, in c.tnlideration of expences incut red fl:r reading newf papers daily. Mr. Serjeant Smepsmtn, for the Defendant, con tended thiat the note was vitiated being given for an illegal ccnfideratit•n. The Plaintiff had !ell out newipapers to the Dzfethlant, Contrary to an AO ..f Pat ltament palled in the 2 9 111 year of his prcfent Ala- jelly, which prohibits newirnen, hawkers, and others, from letting out newfpapets for hire, under the re. salty of 51. The Learned Setjeattt called Mrs. J•tlia Temple, the Defendant's &lighter, in fopport of his cal:. She dated that her father hired newiparer: of the Plaintiff in 1792, which were left ever y mot ning, and returned at two o'clock the fame day. Sir JAMES MANSFIELD °Met ved to the Jury, with retina to this demand for newinarets. the law lays, no man (hall tecneer on a tranfa:lion :Thick the law forbids : that being the cafe, the note in yiellion is founded on an illegal tranladion, and the Plaintiff cannot recover. The Jut y, after I . OIIIC deliberation, found a verdid for the I).kt:dant. .'ANT V. UVFBTnN. This was an aaion to recover damages for an of fault and battery, in which the Plaintiff torcl Intrained io tevere a pugilization as placed hint under the care of a do tor. The quarrel originated in a pul.iic bottle, in which both parties were eng rged in a dii pute, that ended in mutual and. groli abide, which provoked the firtl blow on the past of the Defendant, and in the terult, the Plaintiff was to revere!) , beaten as to require medical aid. Having taken all the advantage in hi, power of ph) tic, he nest relorted to law, and brought his aflion for the recovery of 431. Incluhve of his apathecaty', The Defendant, contcicus of his inability to prove the ground of atlion, offered to compromile with the Plaintiff, even to late as Sunday night, and pay him 33 guineas, and the publican, at whole ir , ure the cemell occurred, offered to add five guineas more, with a view to prevent the quits of his Louie from being called into question. The Plaintiff was, however, affinate, and teltded to take a faulting ()tort of his full demand and colts. The Jury, however, Ave pleakd to Corm a very different opini,.n of the n:e►i;s of his claim, for at• though no defence was made to the a&ion, their verdtd was only tot. dam tges, and 4os. coils. Without meaning in the leali to derogate from the contequence of the relpt fable charatters alluded to, it is well known to lone of our Lottery Office Keepers, that upwards rf forty h i di%iduals, w h o a few years ago were in the humbler walks of trade, have arrived to mercantile eminence in the metro polls un the foundation of Lottery Prizes. It is to their honour and credit to nate this, inalmuch as it clearly thews that each r I tritre worthy char-Afters made a prudvnt ute of ;lie talent pielemed them through the medium of Pia tune's Wheel. MARRIED. On Monday Unnight, T. Reece, Lfq of the Secretary of State's Office, to Mils P eeves, of Warwick-iireet, Goiden fquare. Or. Wedmiday, the 27th of May, at Norton, in Lt. flordildre, John Robittfoo, M.l) of•Doncalter, to Mifs Wiliamfon, daughter of the late Robert Williamfon, Efq. of Lotzport, in the above County. At Edinburgh, an the 27th ult. William Jay, lfq mu-chant, to Mifs Layel, only daughter of the late Rev. Alexaioler Layel, mi- Miler of the Scots Church at Rotterdam _ _ Friday, at Fulham, Mr. Thomas Naylor, of Great Newport ftreet, Lung-acre, attorney at law, to Mifs Sarah Alai Barber, joungeit daughter of Mr. John Barber, of Stairwell Moo., near Staines, Middiefez. At Naffau, Ncw Providence, nn the isth of March, Captain Samuel Chambers, of the Royal Navy. to Mira Sufm Matilda Wylly, cldat daughter of William Wylly, Efq. Attorucy•Getxral for the Bahamas. DIFD. At St. Andrew's, on the 2sth ult. Nicolas Vilant, Efq Proreffor of Mathematics In the United College of St Andrew's. At Aberdeen, on the 22d ult. Mr. John Davidfo”, goldfusith. Mr. Davidfon has bequeathed the Nos of tool. Sterling. to be vetted on fecurity, in the hands of the Treafuter of Aberdeen, until it accumulate to the principal funs of t tool. the annual rent whereof his truftees were appointed to apply in founding a fehonl for the education, gratis, of the children of the White Where and Pilots, in and about Enotdee, as well as the children of fuels fea faring people in the neighbourhood, as cannot afford them proper educit ion. On the 27th of January laR, in Dominica, of a fever, Lieutenant Frederick Augußus Whitaker, of his Mak ity's 46th Regiment of Foot. Friday fenright, at bis lumfe at Edmonton, in I ineninfhire, Henry Short, EN. formerly Lieutenant Colonel of the Royal Dra goons. On Tuefday lan, at Simplon, Bucks. the Rev. Graham Hanmes A. M Rellor of Simplon, and St Bartholon.ew, London, and Vicar of Hanmer, in Flintfhire. lately. in her tc _th year, at Harding Farm, near Great Bed win, Mrs. Sarah Turner. H.GH WATER AT LONDON 'MIDGE TO-MOMPOW. 7.e.gru!nß as minutes after sa 41.1ttsauos • 50 minuses guar Is - MR. DUFOUR is perfcilly aware of he Prejit. dicta which many pale(' to thc• advertifing f)lbm, at would rejed it is derogatory to Lis protefh,m, particularly 4s his extenfive pradtice in Loudon entirely precludes the nectffny of itt but having for mantrears confinrel his Pre%ftiec to -the Cute o f Striaures, Obßruz.r..s. Gleas, &c. &c as well as be: ility all other riforders of the Urethra requiring Geri ry: sad Lring .• Sole Proprietor of Datan's cdelarated Medicated EnNics, Le ivsis hinifelfadluated by motives of duty - to adopt it, as the only method by which a great number of Pri-inn, in every part of the King. . dem, may obtain. that effedtual Rely f, which expzrituee proves they cannot obtain from Country Praditiourrs His method is • mild and efficacious; and not liable to the of j , :llans made to L e cultic and other violeut means, which do mkt pre vim a Wank,. For the various Symptoma, fee Mt. D.'s Trealf..:, prise as. 6d, to be Lad at his 'Houle, No 34, Ft ith-flueet, Soho, where hr cut); tinues to give advice in feparate Rooms, from it to 4. Letters tor advice are expteded to contain a Batik Note, PUBLIC ADVANTAGE. THE advantage the pii!)lic Inuit always derive front regularly Educated prufefliunal n dirt.dling ahunft ex. clulively their lteArs to one ipccies cf malaey, was never tu clearly dentonllnted than hy the unexampled faccefs whidt has attended the admiidaration of their new •emedy. and the :are ordinary curt,. it has r.eform,d. 1;4- a 10:.e frriesof years, \trail CURRIE and Cu. Sorgeons, fortn.rly i.l his 11Ni:fly's rervicty have made the Venereal Difeafe the par:it:lll,r ohj.ct of their id , veßigation, and arc happy in has.itiir dircorered a itte,:ieine Nor, • nor to mercury in the c. to of that coo plaint—it k fulliciert to ohferve that the effeds of this remedy r.rt d ie4liy orp2 fret', thole of mercury.for though it cniipicteiy erai:icate. every v. died of the virus, its its muff cot ficmed !tats, yz t it does not in the !eat injure the conttitution—on the contrary. it renov.stes the fp tent in all its natural fundiuns, promotes appeti.e, and tacilitaLs di;rltion—thus inftead of ret'steing a ft r , ng and vigorous coaftita• Lion to the frightful condition that mercury does, it not o. ly pre t,rves that conilitution in its primitive flare, but reltores a weak and detilitated one toils natural flrepgth and vigour. Niiinficrlefs in it niers are ou recent record of the fupt rite efficacy of tlik Mi.ditine. its Wlt rent atO ipeciftc virtues acing as a ine pt tual corrective to bodily delility, whether proccciling front at elect's of conjugal or illicit pleafure, or !rum the more intiduour, though not left dal. itelive indulgetice of hicau tious youth of loch feats in a cet t.tin perideiaus Amidit the melat.chnly variety of diforders which are the coofequeoce of this fclitary vice, there are none more hip eli. g that, tint Oiltrelling hate of (I.lsility and deficiency. whic't prevehts iectubittt r..• the ma trimonial ilate ; the unhappy full', rt r broods over hit nsittorttaie, 'liamed to tick rt lief, until he is .educed to Inch a iLte ut weak • ft as to render life oppreffive. To loch perfnits it mutt be a coo foling rt ri..etioo, to know that they may now, by a new iota:Mile mode of treatm lit, he reflored to that treated (Wall fanal: idtif. ings, a (from,. manly. and vigorous conitit iit In all cart sof d. iii d. ticieticy, from whatever caufearifmr, as wet. as in i very fpecies c t revere:l nth:cam. Alt ti s Curl L .u.d Co. rin,y tie c,.r,fulied by p Mete: of either kr, with the greatelt ferrety and hi•nnor, at their houk, i.o 107. Hathin Garden. Letters from the Couture (pot:, paid) includi:T a hank note, wil,have the met I.ey medicine end advice fete to soy part of the Kingdom. Ni. r Heron Garden. T...uAtts I-A,. • pest Sir, No. 9, 13rige-ltreet, Iri:.El. it .4 it inCllmbeot urn the, to iniortll yi , ti of the very great arid y Cure I hay.. received . r .01 y , ur iriva;oahle 111cd.ctio—l.b..1 4 :1..', PA 1 E.N•I' ye...tr.. , ago I ti a, att.:led tt tit a l'enere..l Liii;.rder which 1 rr..:ated ratio r r f .me ti: c, hut the lencth i;.readrig ad over toy BAly, 1 teas , I , :i t :tal to apply to the mutt 01.1;1(11C. 11 he I:acuity, but tilt :r afforded only tem porary rclitt. I went Heron h ea , c 'lmes of S,cjv a tv g) , a n d from rather of a c..rpdeot 1-1 •hit was reduced to a mere • Skeletoi , . Ile ulcers that f a , rca aii to?, rmy limbs, rendered ms a complete oljeCt, to that riy fri .1 ds defplircd it my r. cuvery. %Viten brought to ibis lituation, I conliticred death as inctit.ll.3le, but a relatu n ,•f mine commenting uron the many cries iu w itch your Pills had f0cc...e.1, ii, I was ,intlixe d. t try a bt,it op which I thought rith• r relieved me, and by 1.. ricsuraitie for ;WO or tierce m •nths, and y ur dir.ctions, xpei rented ill.- molt unaccount..bl, reaxation front pal the fort ? ridually ; I an: now, thank Goo, I ei fecdr r,eovered,and gait Pig out daily : I doubt not bur. ore 1110:C h. x, which I think ciao. /.in. to take, will dtablith my health In Ira original ft .te. It is with the m heattlelt gratitude that I fubferthe myrelt, Sii your much obl:g-el bumble WM. PIERSUN. Dcanf..ve, Niachelt,r, July I, Pict. P.S. 1:or the public h odic I ~;o not objc,9 to the above b. ip 4. pub:abed, but leave you to act as our owl. better judgnient &Care. Prepared and fold by the file Proprietor, Th. MS Taylor Mem hcr of the Roy .1 C..lkge of Sur tors, 11, at his H Nu. 9, New Eridle llrcet Vt'heie, afr:r a c .nllant relidence ii„ moec than ibtriy lix years, iii a IT idtice. pit titularly direel,il to the Cure f Venercal Complaluts, with th.tt inviolable teereey, • which men of his pr. fffioaf Illould al Jiayc (.I,Ltve, he il i u m ., Itimitlf, the advice and Ailtarice 'he gr.ouit iully admlitifteis to p lions raking this Mediune will I deemed by a tlilcernituePub de, as ..n advantarc feleloin to be obt.iiiied,a; d void of ..mbisuity. —Alto 5- Id, by his AKialitiment, for the conveniel ce of thole brit.. at a diilaticc, at the Perfumer's, No. •;; , St. Alb n's.ltrect, Pall Mall; the l'") , Shop, No. Mr D,ro.- r-triri's. No. 7, rifii-ftreet H. 11; Mr. Steel's, Bookkller No. 1.11.i0n Row, Litite 'Envier Hill ; Mr. Watfon's, South:Bridge, Edinburgh ; Mr. Calwtles, Dublin ; Mr !Mange's, Liverrol ; Mr. Atkinf,m'ii, March, !ter; andby one Perron in every con liderable Fown in Great Britain and Ireland, is Boxes of nly as. 9d. each, feal.ot up with full -:old plain direcTons, whereby Pcrfons of either Sex may Cure thenifelves with Eafe, Speed, Se cr..cy, ond farm. WHEN Prole(Ilona! Men of Education and Re konfibilit y deviate from the general Syltem by the feledlion of a particular branch, the function of long continued fuccellei is the heft criterion of fupericrity. Thirteen years have I devoted my r.radice to the exclulive treat ment of Three I)iforders, and the fuccefsful refult of my plan gives me additional ardour to oppofe as far as I am able, the ravages of thole Complaints which are the molt important in the Catalogue of Human Itifirmiies. After initiation into every Branch. as an Army Surgeon, I formed a wish at an early period of pri!lice to rclen: individuals from the ignor nice of unalneated men, or the equally danger.:us precipitancy of gcnerai . 1 he Three I,ifrders, to the cure of which I have devot e d my attention, comprife evirty fpe;ies of V EN!. REM. INFECTION, whether of a recent or long duration; aily, all kinds of debility, whether wiling from the habits of fchonl boys or the indulrecca of mature ag.-; and, lailly. that derangement of the fyltein in wo• men which is called BARRENNESS, or S TERILIT Y. Numerous Difeaft.s are the refult of ignorance, or haße in the treatment of a fimple Gonorrhee.i ; and it nut unfrequently hap pens that the feeds a Life are poifoned by the indifcr,tina of art unguarded hnur By a fupt riot- trartlin I fuch Complaints arc eaGly curtil; and, even where miters have failed, I truft that I may prc fume to oiler a radical reAtaldillmiert. Few, however, arc the cafes of complicated diftrefs in this dif• order, compared with the calamitous fituatinns of men, who, from an i m i n t g oiee in a fatary vice, or the prevalent ga'eties ofi a fafhionable life. acquire that Rate of debility which is the una voidable confequctice of Inch pernicious habits. %%here the unhappy (offerer broods over his mifery, but care fully conceals Isis misfortune, it may be come confulation for hint to know, that although it he an object of doubt or uncertainty with other pradlitioners, the removal of theft titticiencies by the gradlial progr:fs Of renovation, is the acquirement of my exper ence If the rites of Bacchus or Venus have began to reduce manly vigour, much anxiety will be prevented by an early counters Lion of this languid Rate; and in there cafes no gre,tt difficulty will occur. But where this deficiency has for years exifted, a proper pafe verance is indifpenfably tequilite to revive the fluml)ernez (parks of life, and to reanimate the conllitution. The feerecy which is fo effential to my undertaking, and the gralificatiotts which I have prefumed to ttate, form the hafis of oty pretcnfions, and in coincidence with filch this intimation is given, that Mr. Bree may be conflated ptrfonally, eir by Letters (Inclofing a (mall Note), at his houft, No. 29, Arund,l-ftreet, Strand. near Temple-Bar. _ . . 0" There is au additional Entrance in Water areet adjninint and the name in on both the doors. liREh, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons in isendan• A Cm's - tow—Some Perfotfe, who falfely afftrt thentfeliea to be MIM/ILlts or Tut ROYA Ce I. ea c, having for ftveral month' pat copied my Advertifements alinaft word for word, and infertot them as their own produdtinns, it is my duty to mention, that thole Perrone are test Member, of any College in Londe'', Edin burgh, or elfewhere; nor have they any right to practice Urger in London. N. B. A LIR of the Members is publiftwd at the Houle of the College in Lincoln's-lon Fitids, which may be referred to. LONDON: Printed and publithed by LEVEL KEN r, (Of Oa' terhury-Place, Lambeth), at the S rAR Or►ici No. t, Camp Rrcct. Publited alto at be STAR Of RICO, Temple Bar-