Star. — London, England, 1809-02-14 00:00:00

once.•--Q. Is the witness confident that she saw him only once ? A. Yes, I • am sure.--Q. On what day did you see him ? A. On Thursday...-Q. At what hour of the day on Thursday did the witness see him ? A. At night.-- Q. Did the witness pass under her own name when slle went to visit Mr. Dowler, at the hotel ? A. I did r.ot pass under any name.--Q. At what hotel did the witness see Mr. Dowler ? A. At Reed's, in St. Mar tin's•lane.---Q. Did she see him oftener there ? A. No, I did not.---Q. Was she long in company with Mr. Dowler on that occasion ? A. Am I obliged to nnswer this question ?--Q. Did the witness see Mr. Dowler on Friday morning ? A. I did. Q. ( Mrs. Clarke examined by Mr. LYTTLETON.)— The witness stated on a former evening, that she had nO credit with his Royal Highness the Duke of York's tradesmen, did she ever draw bills upon the Duke of York, which his Royal Highness accepted ? A. His Royal Highness always drew them and ac cepted them himself.—QDid the witness never send ,a bill, accepted by his Royal Highness, to Birkett the silversmith ? A. Once or twice his Royal Highness gave me small bills of 2 or 3001. and on one occasion in particular, to pay for a necklace to Parker in Fleet street; but they were always signed-and accepted by himself.—Q. The witness then denies ever having Larself drawn a bill upon his Royal Highness in fa vour of Birkett the silversmith ? A. I do. hi Q. (Examined by Mr. CREEVEY.) The witness has already stated that she only received 10001. a year from the Duke of York; does she mean now to state, that in the course of the three years in which she lived under his Royal Highness's protection, she did not ret:eive from him 25,0001. ? A. Ido ; and though Mr. Adam has stated that the Duke separated from me on account of a debt which .1 had contracted, he never -pl . t. Q. ( examined by Sir GroIic:EWARRENDER.) Did the witness, in the course of the three years that she lived with the Duke of York, not receive '20,0001. from his Royal Highness ?, A. I certainly did not. Q. Will the witness assert that, in the whole course of that period, she did not receive 15,0001. from his Royal Highness ? A, Is it meant to include the house and every thing,- 7 Q. Did the witness receive 15,0001. including house and every thing ? A. I cannot say what his Royal Highness gave for the house; I know what I got for it.—Q. What did the witness get for the house ? A. I got 44001. in all : I asked his Royal Highness to give me the lease, which he did, and I gave it to the Lawyers in payment of sums which they had advanced to me; but his Royal Highness had not paid the rent. for the last half year, non the taxes for the last whole year before it was given up.—Q. Exclusive of what she derived from the house, did not the witness, in the course of the three or four years that she lived with the Duke of York, receive from his Royal Highness X 15,000 ? A. Certainly net. Q. Did she receive 12,0001. including every ad vance beside the house ? A. Did she receive 10,0001. ? A. I received sn al presents at different times from his Royal Higlin;.s, and I cannot take it upon me precisely to estimate ihcir value. --Q. Can the witness take it upon herself to say, that their value did not amount to 5,0tY.1. i A. Of this she was not certain. Q. (By Mr. HERfERT.) The Nvitnrss stated on a I former evening, that her allowance fiom the Duke el I York was one thousand pounds a year, does she now mean to state that she had nothing more than this one thousand pounds a year to live on ? A. If I was Touch harassed for money, and I could not get it elsewhere, his Royal Highness wceild now and then advance me one or two hundred pounds in addition • to my allowance. Q. (By Sir GLonGE IVAITIENDI:n.) The winless stated on her former eN:lmia::lion, that his Royal Highness was in the habit of advancing her money, whenever any thing unpleasant happened, which was constantly the case, and now she states that he extri cated Iler from her embarrassments, in only one or svo instances, how can she nzencile her present state ment with that she made on a former evening ? A. I never received more than .e2OO at a ti:-h&.---Q. But does the witness call. enec Or twice constantly ? A. I did not employ the proper term when I made use of constantly. I never recollect of receiving money in this way but twice. Q. (By Mr. W.keeacn. ) The witness hAs said that when she separated from the Duke of York, she was left in debt A:3000, was not the House given her for the purpose of enabliref her to discharge the debts the had then incurred ? A. There was no money left after the small debts were paid ; L'7oo I divided among the poorer class of persons. I know that the Duke has said that I might, by selling my trinkets, have extricated myself from all embarrassments, but he knows well enough where my trinkets were at the time. Q. (By Mr. SiNmos.) When the witness first went to live with the Duke, of York, did she receive any sum in advance ? A. I received 5001. in advance. Q. Then no part of this 1..300 went to defray the ex - pences of the establishment ? A. No.---Q. When did the establishment commence ? A. Almost immediate ly.---Q. Was £lOOO sufficient for the support of the establishment in Gloucester Place ? A. No, I have al ready stated its insufaiency.--Q. The witness has stated that it was barely adequate to pay the ser vants wages and liveries ; how then did she contrive to feed them, and pay other expellees ? A. That also I have already explai;:ed.--Q. How soon did the embarrassments of the xvitness begin ? A. About half a year after my connection with his Royal High ness was formed. I never applied to him till I found myself distres:ed, end then he told me that I had more interest than the Queen, and th.it I should use it. How did tI do for the first half year ? A. I went on on To what amount ? A. •I really not keeee, i was alv...tys friglitened to look at my accounts.— c e might be the number of the witness's creuitois ? T really cannot tell.--Q. Did they amount a fiity ? 13. Probably they might. Q. 'Were they al..eays very pressing ? A. When I could not give them money, they preSsed for places. When they foul t:ta t no places were to be had? were they nut import,inate for money ? A. Yes ; but they were always well pleased to trust me, ecaus e in the end they were handsomely I.l‘Tere there vo action; brought against the witness for debts ? A. Yes.—Q. How then were the costs of these actions, and large debts besides, discharged? A. I found n eans of vitisfying the claimants.—Q. vete •they not paid, directly or indirectly, by the Duke of York ? No.—Q. Ho ,v does the witness hotel ? A. I believe only !, II • • know this ? A. In the same way that 1 iaio*ittry 1 other circumstance.—Q. Does the :what" WO* what amount she received money for places, - la the course of the three years she lived with his Royal Highness ? A. I do not. - Q. By Sir G. Weatitxxnut----Did his Royal Hish ness pay for the horses kept by the witness, of which she formerly stated that she had sometimes six and sometimes eight ? A. He paid for some of them, but others I bought myself. I laid out X9OO for horses in the course of one year.—Q. Did his Royal High ness pay for the keeping of these horses ? A. He aid not. Q. By a Member—Did the witness ever know Miss Taylor under any other name than that which she at present bears ? A. No.—Q. Has not the witness made some presents to Miss Taylor lately ? A. Yes ; but not within the last two months.—Q. To what amount have these presents been made ? A. To a very trifling amount. Q. By Mr. WARDLE—Did the witness ever know the Duke of York to draw bills at date, in which he placed her name ? A. I do not recollect any occa sion on which this was done.—Q. Were the bills in favour of Birkett drawn in the way which I have just described ? A. I did not see the bills.—Q. Was the . house which the witness stated as having lived in at Wey bridge ever repaired at her expence? A.Yes; I laid oat between £2OO and £3OO in repairs upon that how e : the oil-cloths alone cost me from £4O to 450 to form an awning to keep the Duke from being seen when he came to me. Q. Does the witness know how much her jewels cost the Duke of York ? A. I never asked.—Q. Were they ever in pawn ? A. Yes, at Parker's, in Fleet-street —Was he not acquainted .with this cir cumstance ? A. He was, for he once gave me a bill under his own hand to redeem them.---Q. Does the witness recollect what was the amount of this bill ? A. Yes; 4001.---Q. Did the witness, while living at Hampstead, never call herself yowler ? A. I may have taken that name in joke, but I always went under my own.---Q. Did the witness receive any let ! urs at Hampstead, and how were these letters addres ; sed ? A. Either to Mrs. Clarke, to Captain Thomp ; sort, or to Mrs. Nicholls, (who was my e cook, and in ! whose house I lived), as I was afraid at that time of being arrested.---Q. Were none :tddressedto the witness ' under the name of Mrs. Dowler ? A. None.—Q. Was Miss Taylor frequently in the habit of visiting the wit- I ness when she lived in Gloucester-place ? Yes ; very ; frequently, two or three times every week.—Q. -Did Miss Taylor ever dine at the witness's house in com pany with his Royal Highness the Duke of York ? A. She has several times. Q: Does the witness recollect the names of the ser vants who waited upon the Duke, Miss Taylor, and her ? A. I seldom allowed.servants to conic into the room. They generally only handed the plates into the robin, but it W:IS Very w :11 known in the house that Miss Taylor was there at the same time with the Duke. ' --Q. Had not the witness at that time a servant of the name of Samuel Carter ? A. Yes l • but this Co lonel Wardle promised not to mention (if Q. How long was he in the witness's service ? A. A bout a year..---Q. Was he not constantly•in the ha bit of waiting at table upon the Duke, Miss Tayloi, and you, during that time ? A. He was—Q. While the witness lived - in Gloucester-place, Samuel Carter lived in the house performing the services of a &est man ? A. Yes----Q. Was he known to the Duke in that capacity ? A. Yes—Q. Where is Samuel Car ter now ? A. In the West Indies—Q. Did you pro cure for him a commissipn in the army ? A. I did. In what regiment ? A. In the 16th regiment of foot, and he is now on the staff. Q. (By Mr. HERBFRT ) Does the witness know the reason for which the Duke of York withdrew his protection from her ? A. Mr. Adam has statedthat it was on account of my extravagance ; but he knew of my contracting debts long before the time that the separation took place.--Q. Was it not on account of the witness's interference in military appointments ? A. I never heard of Was the Duke acquainted with any of the transactions respecting , your disposal . of commissions, Ste. ? A. With the whole. Q. (By the Al I'ORNEY GENERAL.) Did the wit-, ness never say that Dowler was her husband ? A. I never did seriously,-Q. Did rhe ever say so ?•A. It is possible I may, but it must have been to some per son with whom he was very intimate.—Q. Did the • witness never assign a reason for keeping it secret A. Not to the best of my recollection.—Q. Was he ever in the same house with the witness at Hamp stead ? A. Yes.—Q. Did he ever sleep in the same house ? A. Yes, but not with me.—Q. Had he any acquaintance in the house but the witness ? A. There was nobody in the house besides myself, excepting a French young lady and Captain Thompson.—Q. Was not the expellee of part of the establishment in Gloucester-place paid by the Duke, over and above the annual allowance of 10001. a year ? A. I do not recollect. Q. Did his Royal Highness pay no tradesmen's bills ? A. Yes, I recollect his paying some bills.— ' Q. Did he not pay for the furniture of the house ? A. For part of it he did ; but the glasses, which post from 4 to 4500, I boughtmyself.—Did not his Royal Highness also pay for the wine ? .A. He paid for part of it ; but for some of it [ paid myself. I "saw a great deal of company, and there was a great deal -of wine drank.—Q. Did you apply for the commission fin Mr. Samuel Carter ? A. I did, although I should not wonder if some other name wa: entered as having re commended hint. —[A /attgh.] —Q. Did Samuel Carter go .immediately from your service into the army ?A. He was in the army after he left me. • Q. (By Sir .1. SEBRIGIIT.) 'Did his Royal Iligh ness speak to, or had he any communication With Samuel Carter, either before or after his obtaining his Commission ? A. He must have seen him inthe Isle of Wig!it, because they net there, and this was after the Commission.—Q. Is Samuel Carter a rela tion of your's ? A. None whatever. Q (By Mr. YORKE.) What part of the time that witnes lived in Gloucester-place did Carter liv'p,witb her ? A. I cannot say accurately, certainly many months.—Q. Was Pcarson butler at that timOiliss Taylor was in the habit of dining with you ? He was part of the time, • others thivrest.—Q. HoW old was Samuel Carter at the time hg left you; A. About 19, the proper age fsr a cOnimission.. (Here there arose a :.kehiral 67 of withdraw withdraw 4) The witness Bien withdrew. Before the C.oinmittee bkite tip, a questionsyluput 'to Mr. Adam by Sir Jmuts Hat, and twit' ottpt • - Mozabere, Whethie. he had advised the Duke of York so to the proiriety of peiying Mrs. Clarke her annuity? Mr. ADAM replied, that if the Honourable Gen demon referred to the evidence already before the Committee, he would • have been apprised that he, Mr. Adam, knew nothing about her annuity. (Hear! hear!) The House then resumed, and certain papers relating to Major Tonyn's appointment, were, on the motion of Lord Folk Stone, ordered; and also, it was agreed that the House should this day go into the Committee on the Duke of York, and that Messrs. Shaw, Donovan, and William Nicholls, be required to attend the same. _ _ _ The House then adjourned at a quarter before 3. LONDON. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14. SHROVE TUESDAY. PRICE OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK Consok, for money, 67 67i—for February 67 1 11--Omn. it pr. Exchequer Bills 123. to 14s. pre. Yesterday afternoon, a Spanish line-of-battle ship arrived at Spithead, from Cadiz, with his Excellency Don PEDRO CEVALLOS : he landed at Portsmouth under a salute, and had a guard of honour appointed to attend him. The letters from Cadiz, to which we alluded yes terday, were of the 31st uk.. not the 21st, as printed erroneously. The following writing has been circulated by autho- rity • • (OFFICIAL.) " The Superio ' r Junta of the Province of Catalonia officially an nounces, that the army under the command of the Marquis of LA ZU N , with the Aragonese troops, and the Somatenes, under the orders of the Commandant CLARO, have by theimmited efforts been able to dislodge the French from their positions, and oblige them to retreat to Figueras and Rosas, takirg, at the same time, a quantity of provisions, ammunition, and prisoners, and posting cher:l6A% es in such a situation as to deprive the French of any communication with each other, or with France. " The army of General REDING hoassembled at Tarragona, after his last retreat. It is now composed of 24,00 f) men,, compris ing a regiment of Swiss, fatly arrived from Majorca, and SOLO men from Valencia. "'This intelligence is given to the public by order of the Supe rior Government. " Cadiz, fa wary 30, 1809." Letters and papers to the Ist instant have been re ceived from Lisbon. One of the letters incloses the following from Badajoz and Ciudad Rodrigo : BADAJOZ, JAN. 27. I left Badajoz on the 22d, in order to. obtain in formation of the enemy, and arrived at Merida with out learning any thing certain respecting them. I therefore directed my march towards Truzillo, intene ing to proceed onwards until I should be able to reach them. On the 25th, I fell in with the vanguard of the Spanish army, which was encamped on the left branch of the river Monte, distant about half a league from Zarizejo. There I communicated with Gene• ral Enostiosa, commanding that division, who in formed me that he was going to fight the French. —ln order that I might still . better reconnoitre the enemy's force, and also take a part in thenction, I continued to advance, and passed through Zarizejo, where I assisted at the end of the battle. I have the satisfaction to inform you, that the enemy were on tlfat day driven from the neighbourhood of Zarizejo, beyond Porto Mirabete, to the distance of two leagues from the former• village. T* Spaniards have already two pieces of cannon and a howitzer on the heights of Mirabete, and their advanced-posts are within half a league of Almaraz. The General informs me that his loss in this affair had been trifling ; that he • in. tends to attack the enemy to-morrow, in order to make himself master of the bridge of Almaraz. The French force is said to be 6000 men, and nine pieces of artillery, posted between the bridges of Alrnaraz . and Arcebispo.'! " CIUDAD-RODRIGO, JAN. 23. Accounts received here state, that a party of Portuguese cavalry, commanded by PITALUGA, hav ing fallen in with a French advanced corps, an action took place, in which PITALUGA was unfortunately killed. This was the only loss on our side. Of the French, six were killed, and nine made prisoners.— Nof only the Spaniards, but even the English, bestow the highest praises on our troops..'? The party of cavalry mentioned above is an advan ced corps belonging to the Lusitanian Legion, which is distributed in different points between Almeida and Ciudad Rodrigo. The Marquis de ROMANA and General BLAKE, having by their manoeuvres prevented the enemy from surrounding them, intend. it appears, to take a position on the frontiers of Portugal' Another letter frcim Lisbon states, that the fi rst division of the levy-en-masse had been embodied, amounting to 6000, but was expected in a few days to be 70,000. The English goods in the Custom house were permitted toe reimbarked without pay ing duty. A French Colonel had been taken at a hotel, and after being cut in a shocking manner by some Portuguese piketnen, was rescued from them by a guard of the 20th light dragoons, but died neit day. —The 14th Light Dragoons, which had been em barked, were again landed-to guard against riots— the 27t11 foot still remained on board, and the 9th foot had embarked—the 29th foot embarked on the 31st ult. Different persons, sometimes 20 or SO in a day, were put under arrest, charged with Jacobi nism. The whole of the Danish ships, 29 in num. ber, in the Tagus, were under orders for England, but some of the Captains affected to demur. Admi ral BERKELEY, it' is believed, considers them all as prizes. The George and Anu which sailed lately from Fal mouth for Lisbon, his returned, having, it is said, . been warned off the Tagus on the 2d inst. by the IdooevA frigate. If so the French must have been :apF,lifiegrer . Lisipon on the 31 st ult. than wass t ienerally apprelienditd, for none of the letters of at date wif.eh are have seen %titian their prorimity, • • NAPIT INTELLIGENCE. FALMOUTH, FEB. 11. Arrived the Prince of Wales packet, Captain Ktakt , tEls males from Jamaica, in thirty days. PORTSMOUTH, FEBRUARY 13. Arrived a Spanish line of battle ship from the Wettwar: Wind S. W. PLYMOUTH, FEB. 12. Friday last upwards of forty dead bodies, late belongirq• •„; , Primrose, were washed on shore, near the Black H ea d, Falmouth ; among whom was the unfortunate commander. CI Marx. This gentleman, it seems, along with a Major of ch. 7th Dragoons, and the lad who was saved, were &stink: on a spar, when a heavy sea washed them all off; th.: driven on shore by being struck by a floating hanunock, Captain and Major sunk immediately. Since the fatal .2^-*l,.;* the lad has heed incessantly watching for his captain, last, when he discovered him, With the other bodies, 1y:..3 the rocks. PLYMOUTH DOCK, FEBRUARY 12. Ships of war lying in and within the jurisdiction of *our (exclusive of the Port Admiral's ship, slop sh:r, , 1117spital ditto, and sheer hulks). Hamoase-..Gibraltar,Ke;olution,Alear-Altia, S. 1: • Tribune, Cossack, Alen, Wenzel, Tigress, Panhial, counter. Ia Stonehouse Pool—The Jamaica, Foxhound, Gcl.ltl , : Goshawk, Whiting, Weazlc (2) sch. Black. 1212, Ci4t4.! Conflict, and Nimrod. In Barnpool—The Unicorn and Ann. Between the Island anal the Main—The Raleigh, Crcn l. Martial, Intelligent, Sprightly. In the Sound—' Ile Amazon, Emerald, Lr,vinia, Sharon, Na t . eissus, Comet, Mediator, Plover, Pheasant, Argus, Eclair, Lyn., Ra nth and Entre. In dawsand Bay—Tonnant, Revenge, Bartlane, Bombay, Zea, boas, and Elizabeth. _ _ Arrivedtne FrayExT gun brig, Lieutenant HARE ; and the Turns frigate, of Sit guns, Captain MILLER, from a cruize.— Sailed the T.MtRAIRE, of 98 guns, Captain Sir Cita PIA'S HA MILTON Bart. and the CUCKOO schooner, Lieutenant P a n not . for Torb ay. DOVER, FEB. 19. - An engagement took place this afternoon about a mile free! tit shore, between au English schooner and a trench printer: which the former beat off: the guns at Arclicliffe Fort bcre the privateer, but with little effect : no vessni of any desctiptior near. ANOTHER LETTER, SAME DATE. I am just come from our Pier . Head, where I was upwards d an hour observing a french lugger clueing and misting schooner, and l• am truly happy to say that the lat;er I.: , es raped : the lugger was a - large one, and followed schoonet till within half a mile of the shore. the guns in Arch.liffe aui Townsend batteries, fired a great number of guns at her, and is generatly thoug'it that a bal s ram the former battery stn :c i the lugger : she has got out of gun-shot, and is n3w under jib and mizen, waiting to pick up any ship that nay up. What a pity our cruizers cannot keep the sea to protect trade as well as those luggers, who are now constantly out noyirg it.—Wind S.W. blows hard. DEAL, FEBRUARY is. Arrived the Peattfte.i N sloop from a cruize. Sailed the F: st EA gun brig for Sheerness. Arrived the United Kingdom 1.. India ship from the River. Remain in the Downs his Maj,sti ships as per last. Wind S. W. blows hard. YARMOUTH, FEBRUARY 13. Arrived the BRUIZ IR and BarroiskaT gun brigs, and rem% in the Roads with the Roebuck, Princess Caroline, Atwukii Belerophon,!Stately, Crocodile, Indignant, Calypso, Egeria,Brwei! Wrangler, and Sealark. Wind S. E..—Sixty-five French priso ners were this morning landed from the corvette, captured by Ite AstraxLE frigate, and escorted to prison by; detachment oft! Cambridge Militia. The interest of the !cene increases with the prt gross of the piece, in the case of tie examination, b' the Ho Ise cf Commons, into the charges alit cl_;e( against the Duke of YORK. About - five o'clock, th , hour at which Mrs. CLARKE was expected to mai her appearance, the crowd in the lobby of the Hou , and about the doors, was so great, as to render- the pl.t inaccessible to the Members. It was accordingly fours, necessary to call a strong force of constables to keel a clear passage for the Members and other persons tx longing to the House. The constables formed tw lines from the door of the lobby to the exterior door the end of Westminster-hall. Here the massof the crowd v.-ere obliged to take their station, and her they remained until a late hour, all eager to catch glimpse of the spruce Mrs. CLARKE. This Lad; however, evaded their curiosity, as she was admitte, by a private passage. Wednesday, at a meeting of the inhabitants of Glasgow, calico by the Lord Provost, it was unanimously agreed to erect a monk ment to the memory of their ever-to-be-lamented and gallant townsman, Sir Jo lIN Mooar, K. 8.—.-A sum esseediag Ciso was immediately subac ribed. A Meeting of the Roman Catholics of Dublin took place the 4th instant, in that o4ty : it was numerously and respuctabl attended. Counsellor O'Gorman proposed a General Meetim to consider She expediency of preferring their claims to Parli meat at the present moment. The motion was strongly debate( but when the question was called, and the Meeting was prepare for a division, the Noble Lord who presided retired from th chair, and thus the Catholic Petition is postponed sine die. The Seventh Report of the Commissioners if Military 11:1 111 - has been printed and laid before the House of Commons. It em• braces the office of the Secretary at War, the Department of Fr reign Accounts, and the Chaplain General. it suggests the trenchment of several expellees In the War Office, for pamphlets newspapers, delivery of letters, Ste. It also suggests some im• provements in the mode of keeping the accounts, and other In: tees. Among these is a recommendation to the employment only one Agent, acting under one authority, to make all the issue of money for the service of the foreign corps. This morning, soon after three o'clock - , a firerbroke out at IV Asides Cooperage in - York-street, WesbUnstir; winch but wish great mpidity for above wham, and threatened clevastati to the York Brewery, nearly adjoining and the neighbourho( It consumed the whole of the premises where it b., gun, and houses of Mt: - TAtrib;greeer, and Mr. Dudley, Fatten-. Wald were in imminent danger of being consumed. Mr. Elliot, brewer, at Pimlico, sent his engine the first, and his man piar it : through the activity of the firemen, and also those belongi to . the Hope Insurance Office, it was got under. M. Askell 1 suffered considerable loss. A waggon load of canteens, for t army, were delivered into the premises on Saturoay, consisti of 1200 in =saber. Mr. Askell escaped with only his waistcc and small clothes on.—The Queen's Guard, and the:lilt-y ard C u:, active. The celebrated Mrs. CLAK Kt, returning from the Ha. of Commons in her carriage, was the first person who gave I at Whitehall, attended, and the St. Margaret's and St. Joh: Volunteers, assembled with their usual alacrity, and were v' alarm to the watch-man; by her screams. Speculation has seldom been known so brisk as in the press Lottery, in consequence of Tickets rising to £55 in the 1. Scheme, and of 1,300 bring now given to adventurers, in mit tion to the•vast opulence of the Scheme itself—consequently ' 18,500 for sale. MARRIED. On Satstrday last, at Al!bellows, London W4ll, by the Rt H. J. Knipp, A. M. Mr. J. Lloyd, of Fen-court, Fenehurr ttreet, cornhator, to IVIIss elements, of Charles-square, Holt( • - DIED. On WidnesilarAto atit instant, at Wells, in Norfolk, 5' ilill,Bag, 1 7 y , in that county, having on the pre eedia day comje _aw of his age. He lived beloved and rosPect • 01411 dkd,Ndnt lamented. LONDON Printed and Waked by LEVEL KENT, of C, terbuty nee, Lunged', at the Srat-Ornc E, No, 1, Cali street. -Pliblisbitilho al Ike STAvOirnsit, Temple Eat. • 'l4 t 1. t ; 1!. td.! : Nar. Lym, Zea- d the izt HA- DDON. In el fitce: riptior rds of 'ing c:. ooner and and it struck !ct Alt 'ln , C F: ijasty remain pricu.. by Ike : of the e pro. n, by d , ed c,Ahe make iou , e , place found keep ns be- two oar at of the I here ttch a Lady, nitted Dla lace 1a t :1 1 15°In b Co l a: : g keting, Parlia- ebated, repared am the Inquiry It em- of la- the re- whlets, ne im- er mat. nail of ie issues at Mr. h burst station urhood. and the : maker, lot, the longing nbk P ei soutr a :ct: S htic :: ( hes: ! lave the . John's re vtry present the las' in addi- ntly hat is Rev tchurch- iorton. k, John receding ved and ,nlCor Catty.