Star. — London, England, 1811-04-19 00:00:00

. . . , . • I greeina•P•mioN.,=------ MIMITES OF EVIDENCE, GIVEN BEFORE Ter. COMMITTEE OF PRIVILEGES, 7.owlinin the Petition at WILLIAM FITZ tjARDIWOL DIAKILLZT claiming as o f right to be Earl of Beagle?, meal referred. ------- , I • FRIDAY, SI "ell 01. The Right Hon. MARY Countess of Butanes was called, and a chair being pieced for her, her Ladyship came to the table, and having been sworn by tho LOttEi CHANCEL-Lott, was examined as follows : When was your Ladyship first married to the late Earl of Berkeley ?—On the 30th of March, 1785. - Where was that marriage solemnized ?--In the pa eish church of Berkeley. Who was the Clergyman that solemnized that marriage ?—Tha Rt 9. Mr. Hupsman. . Who were present at the time of the solemnization of that marriage ?---aMy brother, Mr. Tudor, and the clerk, and the late Earl of Berkeley. WAS it the regular clerk of the parish who attended on that occasion ?...-No, I believe not. Does your Ladyship know who brought that per son there who officiated es clerk ?—I understood Mr. , Hupsman brohght him there. Does your Ladyship know who that person was ? No, I do not. Was the marriage duly registered at the time ? Yes, I think it was ; I am sure it was. . ' Did your Ladyship sign your name to that regis• try ?—Yes, I did. • The witness then turned to an entry in the parish ' • register of Berkeley, which was read as follows .: No. 74.-Frederick Augustus Earl of Berkeley, of this pa -Wish, bachelor, and Mary Cole, of the same, spinster, we re mar- Pied in this church, by bans, this 13th day of March, in the year :1785, by me, " AUGUSTUS TINO.MAS HUSSMAN, vicar. " This marriage was solentnized between us ' • • " In the presence of W.Tuooa. BESIELLET. " TileGlArk )4 Of RICHAUD BARNS. MART Core. . . The entry was shown to the Countess of BERKELEY, and her Ladyship was farther examined as follows : Will your Ladyship state to the Committee whe ther the name ". Mary Cole," affixed to that entry, is your Ladyship's hand-writing, and was written at that time ?—Yes ; and it was written at the time. Will your Layship state whether the name " Ber keley"•is the hand-Writing of Lord Berkeley, and was written at the time ?—Yes, it is the hand-writing of Lard Berkeley, and was written at the time. - ' Was the name Augustus Thomas Hupsman writ ten at the time ?—Yes, it is the hand-writing of Mr. Hupsman ; and that name was written at the time. Was the name of William Tudor, which your Ladyship will find there as a witness, written at the time, and by Mr. Tudor ?—.Yes, it was. ! v Was that marriage immediately avowed, or was it kept a secret ?—lt was kept secret. When was it first proposed to the Earl of Berkeley that that marriage which your Ladyship has stated to , the House was kept secret should be avowed i--r cannot exactly tell. Does your Ladyship.recollect, when it was pro posed to Lord Berkeley that that marriage should be avowed, the reasons that Lord Berkeley gave for the farther concealment of that marriage ?—Yes, I do re collect them. Have the goodness to state them ?—Lord Berkeley gave me as a reason, that the registry had been des troyed, and that it could not be avowed without great risk to the clergyman who was supposed to have des troyed the registry. In consequence of that communication from Lord Berkeley; was it determined that the marriage should still be kept secret ?—Yes, it was. , Does your Ladyship recollect consulting with an y and what professional man, and whom, respecting what was to be done under the idea of the,registry have] ing been destroyed?--Yes, I consulted Mr. Bearcroft. 'When did your Ladyship consult Mr. Bearcroft ? . Ido not exactly recollect the date ; it was before the second marriage took place. Will your Ladyship be good enough to state to the House what advice Mr. Bearcroft gave upon that sub feet ;•--He recommended a second marriage, under • the circumstances of the case. - WAS that advice • in writing ? — No , I think it was pot in writing. Did your Ladyship immediately eclniesce in the advice of Mr. Bearcroft, that there should be a second .marriage ?—No, I did not. - Whatavere your Ladyship's reasons for not immetr- - ately acquiescing in that advice?—l thought it would he forsaking my eldest son, and giving up all possibi lity, in my own mind, of proving the first marriage. In consequence of this. had your Ladyship a se cond interview with Mr. Bearcroft ?—Yes, I had. Did he get over those difficulties which existed in your Ladyship's mind, and how ?—He did not quite get over the difficulties. But did your Ladyship submit to his opinion ? Pie went to Brighton, and I determined to remain un married till he returned. Mr. Be know whlo I was. Be arcroft did not thcn In consequence of the advice you had received from ri Mr. Bearcroft, did your Ladysh i p ult imatel y consent l' to a second marriage ?-I did. . Wilhere was your Ladyship married tOtorcrßeike: ley a second time ?—ln the parish of Lambeth. - : On the second marriage taking place, was the mar riage avowed, or was it still concealed ;—The mar riage was still concealed. Did your Ladyship take the title of Countess of Berkeley, or did your Ladyship pass by the same name you had formerly passed by ?—I passed by the - same name I had done before, and refused to be ac ' knowledged then.- liy what name did your Ladyship pas?--Miss Tudor. • Down to wh;tt period of tirtre did your Ladyship • continue by the name of Miss Tudor ?—I cannot ex actly tell to a few months, but I think about the tit. ter end of 17,97, or the beginning of 1798. Is the Committee to understand that your Lady. . ship then assumed the title of Countess of Berkeley .?* Yec, I did. . I Was the petitioner then called by the title of Lord Dorsky ?—I cannot answer to a few mouths, hut . : . sirup soon after. From the period when the petitioner was called by the-title of Lord Dursley dewy to sh edrsent time, has been called by the tithrof LoDurslcy , . :Until his father's death. - '.' - Has he been in every respect treated , from that time ' as the eldest legitimate soh of the late Earl Berkeley i., Yes, he -, ..11.6 treated solrom the hour of 1 s bir th , ex cep; in aaktng the tide. , Dues your. Ladyship recollsit thi Millieli -upon . .. . . . . . L...._...../.- • ---- ' . ' '' ' • __ _ - you took down from the dictation Lord .„ you delivered over to Mr. Hughes ?—I did. By Lord Berkeley's orders ?—Yes. Did your Ladyship, in consequence, give any directions, and what, to Mr. Hughes ?—Lord Berke ley desired me to take them to Mr. Hughes, to have them written out, and to be returned to him (Lord 'Berkeley) for his Lordship's signature. Is the present claimant the first son of the marriage of which your Ladyship has spoken i—He is. The Attorney-General stated to the Committee, that as it would be necessary to request the attend. ance of the Countess of Berkeley on another occasion, be should not now trouble her Ladyship with any questions.—Her Ladyship withdrew. Then EDWARD JENNER, M.D. was called in, and ex amined as follows : You were the Physician who attended Lord Berke ley in his last illness ?—I was one of the Physicians Do you recollect what was the state of Lord Berke ley's _health on the Ist of August ?—His general sunk at . _ health then was extremely bad ; very much that time. Was there at that time any probability of Lord Berkeley recovering from the illness he then labom-ed under ?—At that time I had relinquished all hopes of Lord Berkeley's recovery, What was the state of Lord Berkeley's mental fa culties at that time ?—According to my conception, they were perfectly clear and distinct. -Was Ldrd Berkeley aware, to your knowledge, of the state of danger that he was then in ?—Perfectly aware, not only at that period, but previously to it. His Lordship began to despond long before his medi cal attendants began to despond. Did you know Mr. Hupsman?—lntimately. Have you sten him write ?—Many. times. Then the entry in the Registry of the Parish of Berkeley, of the marriage of the late Lord Berkeley, was shewn to the witness, and he was asked, Do you believe that signature, " Augustus Tho mas Hupsman," to be the hand-writing of Ilia Hups man ?—Yes, I do. Then an entry in the Registry of Banff was shewn to Dr. Jenner, and he was examined as follows : 'Phis book contains a registry of the publication of bans ; do you see in this book any thing that is of the hand-writing of Mr. Hupsman ?—Certainly I do ; 'this (pointing to the entry shewn him) appears to me Ito be the baud writing of Mr. Hupsman ; I believe it to be his writing. Do you believe the signature only, or the whole of the entry to be his writing i-.—l am more impressed with the signature ; that makes more impression than another part of a man's writing. But what do you believe as to the rest ?—lt bears a, strong resemblance as I can recollect at this period; he has been de.td many years, and it is a long time since I saw his writing. It bears a stiong resem blance, andahe signature itself is the same as if it had been engraved to be a tac-simile. With respect to the rest of the entry, do you be. , beve l from your general knowledge of Mr. Hops.' man's hand-writing, that it is of his hand-writing ? I am not so confident of the one as I am of the otherr the one I could swear to," Augustus Thomas Hops. man, Curate," is the same as he always wrote. 1 re collect a peculiar turn of the letter A, which fixes it strongly in my mind. Then the entry was read, and is as follows : " Bans of marriage between Frederick Augustus, Earl of Berke ley, of this parish, bachelor, and Mary Cole, spinster, were published on the following days, namely, en Sunday the 2 , ,t1e of November. Sunday the kit of December, Suaday the 1.2t11 of December, 1784. " AUGUaTUS fiSOMAS Hu MIS• 14, Curate." Was Lord Berkeley, as late as the sth, perfectly master of himself, and in possession -of all his facul ties ?—To the 4th I can venture to say positively. (Question by a Loan.) Is Mr. Hupstnan's widow living or dead ?—His widow, I believe is now living. ! Did he leave a daughter behindl—He left a daugh ter, who is living at Berkeley ; she married a gentle man of the name of Hicks. . Do you recollect a man of the flan*: of John Clark being Parish Clerk of Berkeley about the year 1784 —Yes. Do you know where he is living ?—the last time I heard of him was about twelve tnontlis ago; he was then living in London. . You .do not know whether he is living now ?—No, I do not. . . Of whose hand-writing do you conceive the entry itself of the marriage to be, independently of the sig. nature'of Mr. Hupsman ?....—I cannot form an opinion of that. . . - . ..• . . • ' . ... • , . . . , . " • . , • . . t r t . I lOMAS . L . Olt, r.l o A f' S g'2 lL , 'New . Newish min -street •.. - . lowhich he was first called Leltd Dallier! ?-I't was in I Do you think it i's the hand-writing/of Mr. Hops- -I- "V*11"41:44' vg4l.ll o Vxr;44.. . ithsett ar Lif e : sir :l :rb il : L 7w7 7 lll hisvilal. lace : "11.-": consequence of an opinion given by Lord Chief Jus- ' man to-I do not think it is so much like the hand- , tice Mansfield. . writing of' Mr. Hupsman as some I have seen: f .11 1. 111 2r dt f , ") 3Uti tial th11 .1 i h t l i f ; l : f2 Your Ladyship was living with Lord Berkeley at Lock at the Ain Frederick Augustus Earl of - Berkeley ; is the A of his hand writing ?—I do not the urnill vriod of the year when AIL Illirltles 4t cee 'nE t a v a rays t 84 1; 9 ' the period of his last illness and death ?—Yes. g io i :7 , :s ar ' i tl ;' , i fi g he . t al ti i:n to a g e ri k tav • af, rt; i p li is s o f riiiikrl :egt obi w ort .. i i s s :m Ce t a v i na c e al ki ar re viev i l ii v ii r i s uil ukier t' at ed ! Can your Ladyship form any opinion as to the cause : think that was the common way in which he made of that illness '— The Attorney-General objected to : his A in dre - genes al manner. : s A rier :....:•.Tli,.” tut; lICLR 0 l'l,. V1.1.:b ht i,,„ the question. iDo riu believe it to be his hand-writing ?.—I can . s „, i. „,„ :tv . i „ , It was determined that the question propounded only say that it is Very much like it. " the whwte erizry ?—lt is very much like Mr. Hops- 11 VI ta : : J i t i :: :: :::;:fr at , : u g irreiras i l7:::pt it a zt ' r e . llC: rt l i v . ;: i y et : i t cr .. t: in fe ec ) :7l":: a ea n t I ti : 0 ' ; h t e g i i r i i::l i l ein vis r :::::l ed ..4l i i i:i y ii rd i r i ; l 4 . ll;s c w. .. 5% 1' , ought not to be put. . Whether, whilst Lord Berkeley VAS lying ill at man's hand-writing. l ' ir e ac ct ' r i o n p i i he .Z,itisko e ir * c;io s ' , f N i l l 4 l4 4rja Utedian Were C6 C PSkirare tru:nitera'tr.:64-4-14 Berkeley Castle, his Lordship did not dictate to your Tint A. in Augustus Earl of Berkely, as well as Ladyship certain letteis ?—Yes, he did. the rest ?—Yes ; there is - a generil character . whisk How long before Lord Berkeley's death was it that fixes it on my jnind. I might just make -a remark nary, and ibe'euniffisUs cults weak stideddesi superiority. • Palei:,t Anti.cor ß ls u r ftli tic Dr s o c rZstr f tio dit licel l i eale nes t d n u amli ty pri f lt S t P" ..l int72:l 9 t he dictated those letters ?—lt appears from the papers respecting Mr. Hiipsrnan's hand-writing, that it vi. A 6 tr.reart. to be seven or eight days, but not to my recollection, ried at certain periods in consequence of his having hick, in buttles Of Ss. 6d. double bottles Aka. and Warr •Erta. airy for I thought it had been only thr ee or fobr da y s. lost an eye. - ' included. Compound Erser.oe,Ss. Was Lord Berkeley then in such a state that it ap... Whether the person of the name of John Clark did .- Dispenray, i 5. Soho-aquare, Louden% . . . - _ .. . . _ . • peared to your Lordship he was satisfied he was about not act as clerk by deputy for a considerable period . DR, aarHeRGIVS NERVOUS COItDIAL orieh. to-die ?—Yes, he was. of time ?—Certainly, for some years. • rir'HE latent cause of Nervous Disorders lies in at What did your Ladyship do with the papers you Ni.'hether you know that a person of the name Of i impure stateof 01 .1, e dri a tneit ;i7 ri s e, tj a i r l i t o e l e ui s f; , , w eir r iti i iti iio s i i , a l ekT i;41 : 1 / 2 aniut f..... oo il took down from Lord Berkeley's dictation ?—I gave Pruett was the deputy of Clark at that time ?—A tEe rvii s u n u o st, s fi. U b p r il es or ; tin th g ‘is t . h rpirt e them to Mr. Hughes, tutor to my children, by Lord man of the narne of Pruett officiad for some years Berkeley's desire. for John Clark, hs the lay-clerk of th! parish of Berke- H t . - 2.1 m a t P ' • r citbeil g sti ."l" ed ' il P uchnne • 24? ' tnd were aftecttonsanse,ausl from this dist:au-4i its 4.f tb l i..a.i. Then a letter was shewn to the Countess of Beike- ley ; he has been dead some years. theva riousch i t , it= evury 1 , ley and she was asked, Do you think he has been dead eleven years ?—No, ei:j...) met*, ito thread of elistericeby a F enn 11 ,.,. ~. ..... Is that one of the letters ?—Yes, it is. I.think not eleven ; but I am not quite certain. h af F or a n ed r r e tr t he l h i e nse .. se m in :fit o :i ng n se l h e i . i r eii h i s etki e I : r b b e h s . u t a F es r u 4 ... b r n i : R e t n l it l y si G : , lbi l t u i 4 eti: N i li : rnyi t:c n : l l : : : l l ,:a pl ithar : i or c.aja. .. 3 . t r rie lt i, u ji m in,,: t k i : aki., e:, ,,h ii . : l l, e - y9 3 1 : , . ; : :. i . a 5 e: Is that signed by the Earl of Berkeley ?—Yes. Cross-examined by Mr. ATrolltiev-GEN LH AL. Does your Ladyship recollect, that besides the one Where did Pruett die ?—At Berkeley. just shewn to your Ladyship, which was addressed to Had he lived there for some time before his death ? close attention to bus.nes.,,aol a sekmaryTife. i:ipowcts'lsave . b a r e t i l tl f .. u ,r ll i t t t.o n . - e rr i t n a E w im u i r :. Lord Craven, there was another addressed to his —I believe he never lived out of the place. y si7, l4 aa r rt too 4 : Royal Highness the Prince of Wiles ?—There was. What was he ?—By trade a mason. t g l e te ne u r • a t i ak r :T en ‘e xi s i c . o e o m r ua ec u ted tie zi; so it. w N el : i l L t e n .ap ..l;i teti cinc io pzLe. „ . 7.l4 T . h i Was there any other letter addressed to any other (8 . 1/4 Lord). —Do you know any thing of a man :iv r id : l i v eo ' i i t , oll ths a; , i 4 ccad n k ia d te e n a xm e , 7 t e i n al s el " c d oZli i -mt ear F li b i c ka y ies th:tra::o,7 lo ,• 4 lto a t i . person besides the one shewn to your Ladyship, of the -named Barns, whose mark is signed in the registry ? t v a,ci a tq l: u ; a 7u : sth, addressed to his Royal Highness the Prince of —Nothing whatever. Wales ?—There was one to Admiral Berkeley. The Counsel for the Petitioner stated, that the wit hany'llichaitiinualc.eaesd. t will aitE t . s rr dr ott P e : e n i g ia .a ti n s d n ia r ng ,a l peri dd 'r ecc v sere.i i itel 'esi t Does your Ladyship know whether that letter ad- ness desired to add something by way of explanation dressed to Admiral Berkeley was forwarded to Ad- to his evidence relative to the registries ; and perfnis- a rt promoted by it, and the *whole constithi oil receives new lie a n l i d i•ne.;: " . r d ''ll li b til t..9 .l:bi ul gr cl ail i ,eagerness t i o ve she r f i c l . r M i a t i l e l"la t,sc r rn tt be ..ti.-17e miral Berkeley otitis station abroad ?— Yes, it was. sion being given to him accordingly, he said—The Your Ladyship is understood to say, that the letters hand-writing respecting which I wit examined, in one ard 1.1;,h!y nervouli state whack is Mown co succeed ckildhed, coot '- di 'of - , rd 73erkeley of the books, I believe to be the hand-writing of the j those peculiar , -'' •of the sm. wl•ith by arum of r . ..t: ; - ; - Late Earl of Berkeley, it is so like it. Then the registty of the marriagevas arain sheyn to the winless, and he said, This hears a strong re semblance in its character to the hand-writing of the late Lord Berkeley. (By a Lord). Did you ever see his Lordship write ? —Many times. Do you believe it to be his Lord ship's hand-wr:ting ?—Most firmly I do. The whole of the entry ?—The signature does not appear to be his ; the signature Augustus Thomas Hupsman," appears to be Mr. Hupsman's hand-wri, ting : the whole of the entry, except the signature of Hupsman, I conceive it to be Lord Berkeley's hand-writing. 040:Ilona! ATTORNEY-GENICRAL. At what time did Pruett act as. the deputy-clerk ? —4 cannot exactly recollect, but I have often seen him in that situation, and know that he. was in that ituation for some years. • • (Ey a Lord). —You have stated that the whole of of _. iodispositions -, tion, are apt to prostoce the most fatal andliiiretrfatii iiiielits, and even death itself. h.' 414 .wholesale and retail at Mr. Petite*, No 4 4. a-,,,, , ie, corner of Paternoster-row, Lori:loll - • and by 'most Cott tt y Me dicine Vcadotsdn every tens*, toils:nits it 4i ed. anti ties. th. . • ADM'S, . • NCOU It A G,ED by the uniform success. altenctng A=J theif peculiar meatiod of tfernic-t in the cere' of a w prevalept complainti;Which hails:ten fxmhrmed by thereperte nee of ninny years in Oarge . and eztemive practice ; ceoss . ble al„. of the happy effects resulting •to the public front medical n confining their attention to a entail 'Haw of dkotaiwil Isit4es. GOES and Co. continue to direccAleeir studies to kisow ete,ow'e,s arising trom a secret deotructiye habit of incousiderre. you y, which not only occasions 1 numerous train , el•rsetteaseiaffertqee, but alas entails on its votaries all the eriervalinglatibefaliike of old age. In that distressing state of driselity or deficiency, Wit:. (her the consequence of st.,:h baneful irabl.‘, e xe e 4 b lye a nt ki iin long residence in hot climates, or any other cause, by which the i powers of the constitution become enfeebled, as regietirly ted surgeons of London, they offei t Anivti)e, andlyeedy area ration to sound and vigorous health. Where au early application is matte for the cure of a c-rtia disorder, frequently contracted in a moment of inetrirry, the era dication is generally com.pleteidies this abort ;spate of ow, 11,7% and in the more advanced and inveterate stages of Ventral infection, characterized by a variety of painful and tfisteeesing syMptomi, a perseverance in their plan (without restraint it sins or exercise) will ensure to the natimt. a permanent and radital cure. The diseases of the Urethra, as frequently contreced with or arising irons the above coruphiint, have not estapol their attention; by an infallible and Improved plan, they ate et abled to remove obstinate CLEATS and S tRICTURES. wh.the recent or of long duration, without resorting to the painful and dangerous use of the caustic boogies Many instances can be ad duced of very inveterate easel, of seve—al years continuance, ;rr- Ing yielded to their method in a fetydays, alter the cure had beta attempted by other practitioners without effect ; and such has berg the agreeable result of a practice of fourteen years, taut the mode of treatment has not in one single instance, ever • roqd alx-treve, during which period many thousand persons, of ituiti evx.ts, have experienced the enjoyment of having been perfectly cured, alter were and injurious methods had beets persevered in to to Messrs. Goss and Co. exclusively professing the cure et Awls particular complains, In order that they my not be, by a mis taken few, marked with the obloquy so justly attached to the ig norant empiric, think it but justice to themselves to state that they Jaye been properly educated and Initiated into every branch of the ,profession (certificates of which, frost different hospitals, anti testimonials from the most eminent Physicians, they have is car wince nu) inquirer), that the success resulting from their evict. ;yours last induced theneto cult the practice of the genr-al prat titioner, and they presume tbat their pretentious constitute a 1.4 ground for the unoryeedented confidence with which they hart, by the ?üblic, been so liberally honoured. GOSS and Co. Surgeons, 13, ilioneerie-=truce, Filet-street. thAt entry, except the signature Hupsman, you believe to be the hand-writing of the Earl of Berkeley? —I do not mean to include the signature of Richard Barns. I believe the whole of the remainder to be Lord Berkeley's handwriting, except the signatures. The whole above Hupsman's signature ?—Yes, I believe it is. Dolan believe the word " Vicar," which follows , the signature of Hupsman, to be Mr. Hupsman's hand•wnting, or Lord Berkeley's ?—Not my Lurd Berkeley's, but Hupsman's. The witness was directed to withdraw. Dr. Parry, of Bath, deposed to the soundness of Lord Berkeley's mind at all the periods previously to his last visit (August 7). • Of the various complaints incident to the human I frame, there are none more dreadful in their nature, nor more alarming in their consequences, than the- Gravel and Stone, Pains in the 'kick, Loins, and Bladder, and Lumbago. They are complaints to which every person is liable, and are a foundation - for every other species of disorder. HICKS! SN'S Plus, coMposed of thc most hulocent ingredients, ha ve been found of singular efficacy, in not only strengthening the vessels containing the urine, but happily destroy ing the petrifying quality of it, from which proceed the above complaints, &c. removing the calculi, or gritty secretions, And banishing every pernicious ten dency to those disorders, without confinement. — From a consciousness of the powerful quality of these Pills, fully evinced by a private practice of many years, they are offered to the Afflicted, and recom mended as a Cure for the above Complaints.—Sold wholesale and retail at Mr. Butler's, 4, Cbeapside, corner of Paternoster-row ; and retail by Belam and Sharp, Portsmouth ; Hall and Johnson, Gosport ; Annan, Weston, Mallory and Jones, Portsea ; Trew. man, Exeter ; Cookworthy, Glenville, Gilbert and `Hos - land, Plymouth ; Newbury, Dublin ; Baxter and Macdonald, Glasgow ; Smith, Manderston, Scott, and Cargill, Edinburgh ; Crutwell, Bath ; Ross and Peck, Hull; Gregson and Billinge, Liverpool ; Stains and Lynda, Manchester; Bowen, Norwich ; Knott -and Lloyd, Birmingham; Gregory, Brightan ; and most Medicine Venders, in boxes at c.s. 9d. each. CHALL2IIcE. MESSIZS. CUR RiE and Co. Surgeons, late in '.as Majesty's Service, challenge the whole world to prove a single Instance where their Mediciee and method of cure ha us failed of the 41.:Sired effect. :rise practice of many years in particular branch of their profession Las not given nse to ore unsuccessful cam. 'They continue to direct their studies to the treatmeyit and cure of Venereal Complaiuts, and that derangement ot the w•ressi, which is :he consequence oldie peruki-ms aol we...tend effecr • et a habit long and most uobs..pily pureued blase:youths of both sei.en In tile one it will be found to he tire uuluiling source of !wise nes, ; the other have its ravages fatally developed to them by a :::s. meseing *ate of debility, which, if not timely remedied, terniie:ss in impotence. These are its remote and ultimate eifec ts, tele •:.• sumptions, loss of Muscular power, and Various aervuus etenlea s Usually cli,.racterise the earlier stages of thissblimey rice. e-r -sons under the dieordees tucidont to such a hales, s. ;ler treatment is simple and has never provet! unattce snrl, ;n we Collnl . or a long, laborioes; and MltCli time:led practice. in t he roost obstinate and complicated cases ot venereal iiitection, nick as °burin .. .ions in the utetbn, ungy excrescences, hz, mours,callirdi alters, mutinous, !cranial weakness, Ars SIIIICTIIRES, W!rether recent or of long nt.rt4on, and winch have the skill Mother Practit*lners ; art by their present improved Flan el eel:silent, effectually and permauently oured, without the ramie suffering the excruciating pails and alarming hemorrhage often tames the applieitioes of the lunar caustic. In the course of RECENT CURES, It'll. 20 years extensive prectice In this u urnerous case, at To Dr. SoLOMO re, Gilead-House, near Liverpool. Sfriczirres have been and art daily under their are, the re: - .1 SIR —An instance of the singular efficacy of your I eradication or which are effected by a safe, certain, and cc:rt. Cordial Balm of Gilead, has fallen under my notice, which timis mode of practice, superior to any other yet adse , r4. merits general publicity. A man, In this neighbourhood, about N weakneve, relacetion, and debility proceeding Irons thi4 the age of thirty, bad the appearance of labouring under that lls speedily removed, end the patient re:cored to soend t most dangerous disease, the Phthisis Pulmonalis, or Consumption. gorous health. Iliac where the debility has, for year! 1 - 1 e had a consider hie degree of hectic fever, profuse night sweats, pr o per perseverance in the rr restorative remedies, afar the tr , • expectorated much, and was rediced to a state of extreme dehi- ; cure has been destroyed, is indispensably retiaieite to retire ..;:e lity. Having had the best medieul ad vice be could p rocure, with- • slurnhernig spark- of life, and to reanimate the Cone: tut r• out obtaining relief, he bad recourse t o y our Cordial Balm of , Several Noblenwu and Gentlemeu, ot the firs: Gilead. For some time he perceived little alteration ; but peter- ban been ander the tare of Messrs. Currie and Co. for • vering in the use of this mediene, all the unfavourable symptoms moval of complaints ot the Urethra, Strictures, &c. end• gradually abated, and he has attained a vigorous state of health. t received a r,adieal "and .pernasnent cure, reqhest that reter . 7 Yours respectfully. . 13. Bowe Haar D. 4 may be madn'to sheaf as satisfactory evidences ot the deceits! Pourefeact,' April 2, let I- j pesiority of Mears. Currie and Co i 's plea of treatm.m. ;my To Da. Sohomosi. Gileadeliorse, near Liverpool. - of these Gentlemen have had Strictures bum ten to rn'i•i•lT Silt —About twoyears ego I laboured udder a violent Nervous and had been under the care of Messrs. Home and lirarist,'ol, Complaint, attended with great Weakneie and Loss of Memory ; arid other surgeosie of equal eggs/We e ancluinled was induced to try your Cordial Balm of Glieed, which I pur- by the alipbcatin; of the Ulm &issue, without success. chased df your iticitts •M. and R. Eranthwalte, Booksellers; in • Messrs. Carrie anti Co. may becomnikedbyeither set WO' tint f(endal, and vox usistt found the happy effects wil.ch it produced greatest delicacy, secrecy, and honour , at th e ir house, No. to. , by beingaestesred to my former strength and msmnry. I have a liamori-Cites., .Patlente in the epun::'y are requested to eve wish to make this case public, but motives of delicacy prevent my theparriculani of Kier edse, age, and general habit ot name being inserted. Any• person 'visiting to be informed of fur. ;minims a ran n ttan ee fo r a d v ice a nd nir d, e ines, whe.t the L titer particulars, may have ample information, aud a proper ad. w ill be given nr sent to an y pa rt of t h e ki es d,,m, dress, by applyiug to Messrs. Branthwalte. M. S. l'o ensure 'that secrecysn stett-titi% to their iindertalhr. Hawkshead, April sth, 15 11 . - • PI 4 UV, OI. !te 'Med to the account for medic-11,. sold at 105.13 d. per bottle, and faintly bottles containing four at Sss. each,. laeMithiews. and Leigh, 1% Strand, Loudon, and LONDON : Printed and isebiblied by I.rvr.r. Be r, at the 1 ' all Medicine Venders. • Orrlcs, No. 1, Carsyvitree t , awl at Os VII . . . • . 8111.111. On the 6th instant, the Lady of Gorman Munkhouse, of Winton, Esq. daspitter. ~ ~' t. • „ 6 4 1.0- fieritP 4 44 ' 'U, PAO 0 1 1 lommit ' itZ Rocki Banc Choi ;1 12 , 1.411 Oar MIS I •4;: l cone found sceue boos Pr cc bu I AVg. *Eir We &Art dre _ weds 1 s -"Pe! FR: Atom ..,,~ Ilk `' ti ~ ' _'l !r :r Trml. ~~i I ':~ ~.; L a M 2.ed APQ r~ MOO NEEE 41 1 . • *Wu VOA K ISt. ; ibis eon , Ore' An Gk I'il Fai