Star. — London, England, 1819-12-08 00:00:00

way of Meetings, if the? dilend•d lady on the c o nvener, who might be tot et the County. The c o nvener of Renfitiw Miss Ketnbeir of the House, snd.in attending his dory its Parliament, might End it impossible to comply with t County Requisition in Scotland. Lord ARCHIBALD HAMILTON differed with bi s Noble Friend who had last spoken, on the con struct:on of the Bill. It gave to Lord Lieutenants and Ire Magistrates the same power of calling County m eet i n gs in Scotland as in England. If this were not the case, he wished the.Atterney-General to declare so. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, the Act ap plied to Scotland in the same manner ai to England, s i t h the diffen.nce only of the denomination of the oiacers. Mr. BROUGHAM allowed that his Honourable snd Learned Friend (the Attorney:General) might to apply the Bill to Scinland, but he had not r ,el sufficient words. The law should be precise, and not taken on the interpretation of the Attorney- General.- —The Committee then . divided : For the Amendment of Mr. Maxwell, 81—Against i t , —Majority, ISO. Lord COMPTON then withdrew his Amendment, in consequence of seeing the sense of the Committee o p:nst him, by the previous decision on the Ainend tient applicable to Scotland. After some verbal alterations had been agreed to, Mr. Alderman WOOD proposed, as an Amend ment, to give to three Common Councilmen the right of calling Ward Meetings in the City. of London, if t:'.e Aldermen should refuse. This clause was necei er!, as some Aldermen showed a disinclination to such Meetings. Lord CASTLEREAGItaaw no ground whatever for the proposition. of the worthy Alderman: the clmse he should propose would enable the inhabit ants of Wards to meet at all times in rooms or build ings, and if there *etc none large enough iii.the City, be could recommend Willis s Rooms, in hig (Lord Castlereagh's) own n eigh bourhood.--( Laughter): Mr. Alderman WOOD added, that the Noble Lord might be somewhat alarmed, and see reason for imposing stiU further restrictions, when he found , ten or twelve thousand inhabitants Of a Ward pro ceeding to hi; neighbourhood, even fora lawful pur pose—(Hear, hear). If there were no Public Halls . c: Wards, the Meetings had, till very recently, •been he:d in the churches, but now even those were shut against them. ynAIdermanWAITIIMAN supported theAmend neat, but agreed with the Noble Lord, that the pre rat Amendment was directly against the principle of the Bill, for the principle of the Bill he held to be hostile to all Public Meetings!—(Heiir, hear). Sir W. CURTIS objected to the Amendment. It vent to imply a distrust of the * Aldermen of the Wards, who knew, and who, he was confident, would ever be found ready to perform their duty. Mr. Alderman WOOD said, the necessity of the Amendment was proved by tee fact, that the Alder men of the Wards had refused to call six or seven I::...:tings in the course of the last month—he meant fittings of the whole of the Inhabitants, and not of :ay particular body. Ministers might gain the ques ton, but they should 'not do so without a division, for he gave them his honour he would not see the privileges of the City sacrificed, without taking the st.l , :! of the House on the Claude. - . WAITHMAN again rose, but was opposed by calls for the question. He said be was not dis r3)ed by the noise which prevailed; he was pretty w•eil used to it— ( A laugh).—He did not know that he troubled that House very much or very often, but ii; had a duty to perform, and perform, it he would, and he doubted not but he should rise with the diffi cilties that alight be thrown in his way—(A laugh). He then defended the Amendment, but did not wish C:e House to be divided on it, as he saw no chance DS success. The Gallery was ordered to be cleared, but in compliance with a loud cry of " Read, read," the worthy Alderinan did not press the question to a di- T;sion, and the Amendment was negatived. Mr. Alderman WOOD moved, that after the words " Corporate Body," the words " or Liberty of Lon don," should be added to the Clause. On this motion le thought it his duty to take the sense of the Com •iittee. and should certainly press,it to a division. The SOLICITOR GENERAL *hewed the Amend-' rnent was unnecessary : and, after a few words from :.Ir.WAITHNIAN and Sir WM. CURTIS, it was nega tived withont a division. Lord f'ASTLEREAGH withdrew the Clause ex erti.l,7 Trade Meetings from the operation of this Bel. Individuals mi ght be led to attend such . Meet •tgs, which mi g ht a fterwards be turned by the Ra- . rivals into Reform Meetings, and thus those who 1-ere peaceably disposid, might be, in a manner, en i:apped into that which was illegal. A case in point . ..Li huen stated on the preceding night. At a place Scotlan,l,l;here the cotton manufacturers had as !..nbled to consider of a question of great import :due to them—one affecting their wages, its charac-, ter had been changed in the way he had supposed that this might be done, and the parties had separated 'Pith Resolutions in favour of Parliamentary Refornt, Universal Suffrage, and Elections by Ballot. With drawing this Clause, it was his intention, when the Bill had passed through a Committee, to bring up another Clause to regulate Trade Meetings. Mr. J. P. GRANT thought it would be convenient t'n House to know what. it was ,the intention of 'le Noble Lord to move ? Lord CASTLEREAGH read the Clause he had 21 1aounced, which went to except such Meetings From the operations of the Bill, if held in a room or meted building, After a short conversation'between Mr. MARRTAT Ind Lord CASTLEREAGH, the Clause was withdrawn. Several verbal Amendments were moved, which, 4ter some discussion, were negatived. On the Clause regulating the attendance at Public Loyd. CASTLEREAGH moved an Amendment. Ile thought it desirable that no person not resident in pariah should attend a parochial Meeting, unless it Ire a !natter of some notoriety that the party was a, 1- eeholder. If some provision were not made on this trad any sti•anger might evade the law by saying 1 ,4 he was a freeholder. To guard against such an • currence, he proposed an Amendment, which only 4 ' tie. holders a right to be present at the Meet :n Parishes where they did not reside, who M- R see freehold propeqy of the annual rains Sf 4:60. .as afire ad Tr' that it Friend signatt:i aid be 1:r a C call the Ilkenty ty, the hose cell stateo I he di'Ainct Noble hew), 1 ie to [table It The lsory o the P Iberia lo %% idle !large Lord, I nore strong h Of the nsidered He w. bed to 'ithdraw Noble tion, tl with a 4 an of subject rcise it ET such otection -,ht issue ought tt he two I 31e of b f ere in 1 la up. Dw the n ad how ti vbetber my Ma is or 01 Friend re wss the Ci wirga i t ngs sou o did E Bill esi Scotia' Wlllll Bill. who cc e was ould 'as lodge nut of th -efernient e Co-uni I 6 , , Sir R. FERGUSON called the attention of the House to the statement that had been teferred to by the Noble Lord (Castlereagh), respecting a Meeting to consider of the rate of wages, at Which it had been said a few Radicals had changed the whole of the proceedings, by introducing the question of Par liamentary Reform. The statement was totally With out foundation. At the Meeting in the county of Fife, consisting of from eight, to ten thousand per sons, there were not more than 450 Radicals pre sent, and these were persons who merely•called for the Reform planned by Major Cartwright, and who. he believed, to be innocent of all crime against the State. The People in that part of the country had conducted themselves with the greatest propriety, though their distress was severe, as a man who worked fifteen hours in the day could earn but the miserable stipend of half-a-crown a-week. Mr. WYNNE wished that some provision. should be introduced into the clause,. to declare that house holders should nut be allowed to attend'Meetings of freeholders,. or"Ceunty Meetings, which were ge -1 nerall, composed of such. For a householder was as much a stranger to an assembly of freeholders, as an inhabitant of London would be at a Meeting at York. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL contended, that it had been the geoeral practice to allow householders to attend Meetings of freeholders; it was intended to maintain the law on that footing, and the clause had been so w4rded for the purpose of avoicfitig the in ference and conclusion drawn by the lionoui^able l Gentleman. After a few words from Mr. PROMOS; Mr. Ha NEYWOOD, and Lord CASTLEREAGN, the proposition to exclude householders was abandoned. Mr. GRAHAM inquired, whether the former Re presentative of any place of which he was not .a free man would have any right to attend a Meeting at that place to give ah account of his conduct to those who had been hiseConstituents? He had thehonour of representing tht County and Town of Hull, of% which he was not a freeman, and he thought it world be rather harsh, if, .at the end of the present Parlia ment, he should not be permitted to attend a Meet ing of his Constituents. Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that an exception was already made with respect to Meetings for Elec tion purposes, and he had no objection to take out of 'the operation of the Bill all Meetings of Voters which might occur between the issuing of Speaker's writ and the return of a Member. Mr. BROUGHAM contended, that this would not remove the objection stated by his Honourable Friend, and pledged himself to prove what he now advanc • when that part of the Bill should be before the House. 'Mr. WILLIAMS proposed an Amendment, tend; ing to allow persons who had the right of voting for the election of a Member in Parliament, although non-residents, to attend the Meetings held at the place for which they were entitled to vote. • The gallery was cleared, but the Amendment was negatived, and .the original clause agreed 'to without a division.—On strangers being-ye-admitted, Lord CASTLEREAGH wink arguing against an Amendment proposed by Lord Althorpe on the clausti declaring the attendance of strangers at Meetings a.l misdemeanotir. The Abeniinnent tended to make it a misdemeanour for a stranger to address,- but not to attend a Meeting. Mr. MARRYATT conceived the clause to be really harsh, and should vote for the Amendment. 'Mr. ROBINSON contended, that if the clause was not adopted as it now stood, the whole object of the Bill would be defeated, and masses of stranger's might continue to pour into Parish Meetings. Mr. PRIMROSE supported the Amendment. • Mr. BATHUR I VE :asked, to what purpose to 14A4-- House had been - l Ating the descriptiOn.o . f persons who should be allowhi to assemble, if Meetings were to be thrown open to the admission of all strangers, by the adoption of the Noble Lord's Amendment? Lord FOLKESTONE supported the Amendreent. Mr. BROUG HAM observed, that large Meetings would be held in the country. The attendance of strangers would be rendered needless at such Meet. ings, as no accounts could go forth of what happened at them. (Here the Attorney and Solicitor General turned towards each other). It might, perhaps, be considered not to signify, whether those who- give nth accounts to the Public attended or not. They, probably, were to be treated with contempt. (Here the Honourable and Leamed Member made some ob servations on the attempts made by the Attorney Ge;. sesial to subvert the Constitution). It was, he ob i itereed, of consequence that Reporters should attend such Meetings. They were a part of the comma eaiity ; reporting was dietr trade, as mach as the at , lendance of the Attorney General in a Court of Law was his profession—as much as his attendance to the interests of his constituents was his duty. The busi ness of Reporters was an itspertant one ; were it not for them the Public dould not receive accurate• ac counts of what was passing in the country. It was, perhaps, below the consideration *of the Attorney Ge neral to look so low as to'consider how reports were prepared for the Press. It was unwerthi of him, considering the high eminence on which he was placed, to look to such matters—(Hear, hear,isear), But he hoped, that he (Mr. Brougham) writ) - was placed nearer the station of Reporters, mig ht be `allowed to know' something of the matter. Ho re peated, that in this Bill there was no prevision which snowed the attendance of that meritorious class of persons at any of these Meetings. How were those k situated ? They were not freeholders • =in, they were not freeholders of elosties,S were not resident householders in parishes Ott* eould they Attend any of those Meetings? Be. questions to be discussed of ever is tnomentotis nature; no matter whether it was a Meeting to 00, 1 cuss the property-tax, sr any other irbporrant questime,l from the observations upon which the House 111 W take a suggestion as to its decisions; no matterWintl ther it was to the People; 'encourage the reign enemy, purposes ; the A visit from . a state of inefficac• the Noble Lou' clauses for the ex frees such Meetings. to what were they Meetings to b• Were the r t • - am. _ of ototantY?—.4 very **el officer, to be lure, but 'the l_ ot ( e z e a r a y s4ter likel . f _towbeere they anexpett writer of short hand to Icink to the Custos Rotulorum, or High-Sheriff, neither of whom, though highly serviceable, could be expected either to attend to, or be able to write short-hand?, They had next to look to the Freeholders—and it the Honourable Member for Montgomeryshire had car ried his Amendment, they would have none but Free holders and Country Gentlemen to look to. Under such circumstances, he would ask, what chance was there to expect that a fair account of such proceedings could be laid before the Public ? For these reasons, , as well as those urged by his Honourable Friends, he, hoped the Amendment would be adopted. The ATTORNEY-GENERALobserved, that after the most unprovoked attack •--(Loud cries of Hear; 'hear!)—he repeated, after the most unprovoked and tilideserved attack which had been made uppn him— , an attack, which he had not uttered a single syllable tcr deierve, lie felt it necessary to trespass upon the, House for a few moments. It was said that he enter tained contempt for that body of persons called Re porters. What had he said contemptuous of them ? What had he 'said of them at all? He had never spoken of them during the night. He bad attended to his Honourable and Learned Friend,' as he• was bound to do, in order to obviate his objections to' he Clause, but he .jeclared that in supporting that Clause he had no view ; he had never given any opinion that any set of persons should be excluded, except by the general provisions of the Act—( Hear, hear tfrow the Opposition). The Right Honourable Gentleman, after some observations in ansveer to some arguments urged against the Clause, begged the House to excuse his warmth on this cccaston ; the attack made upon him necessarily made him feel warm. The object of that attack was with a view to. render him obnorioes to arespectableclass of persons; against whom he bad never uttered a sylleble t but with whom he could not expect to stand on the same terms as his Honourable and Learned Friend (Mr. Brougham). Having said se much, he now came back to-the Amendment. It would, if carried into effect, go to destroy the enact ments of the Bill. The object of the Bill was to pre vent tumultuary Meetings i the Clause necessarily went to authorise. fh Meetings. Mr. BROUGH . M said, that he had made the eito 4 observations of h his Honourable and Learned Friend, the A e] -General , complained, as he not only hea dicheer on the other side, when he spoke of Reporters, but he also -observed what he conceived a motion of contempt spade by hfin (the Attorney-General) at the same time—(Cries of lib, no a)—Gentlemen who were placed behind, and Who could not see what passed,.might easily say No ; but there was not one who:was then roaring No f who could have seen the' movement to which he al , luded. He was, however, now aware that fie bad misunderstood his Honotitable sod Learned Friend —(Hear!)—There was not any man Who was'more rigid against Reporters, or who had more zealously supported the privileges of the House when it was, invaded by them ; arid', added the Honourable MOP.' her, there is no one,who has antlered more under He only - spoke of Repertoire as a neefub body, in k to the. Publit fair, accounts. of whet petrel Pith& Meetings. • . . The ATTORNEY-GENERAL denied thrit he had aimed when Reporters were spoken of.' Fie Midi, merely turned to speak to hit Honourable 'end' Learned Friend (the Solicitor-General) ors the effect Which the clause would have in excluding Re-' porters-.--(Hear). . The SOLICITOR-GET4ERAL said, the Attorney-- General had turned to him and remarked, that the clause would have the effect of excluding Reporters: from those Meetings. The Honourable and Learned *ember (Mr. Brougham) ought to have heen satis fied of the facts, before he indulged in observations of suck's' style and character as those he had used— (aieerefrow the MinisteriaL,Bensches). Mr. DENMAN supported the Amendment:-. Strangers Might be present, properly and meritori ously, as at Meetings when the distinguished Candi dates at Liverpool delivered speeches, and might listen for the purpose of improving their minds. The Amendment would have been se much (or the inte rest "trf the other side, that he had hoped that the clause would. have been withdrawn, but for the per sonal altercation which had taken place. He (Mr. Denman) regretted the warmth into which the At torney-General had been led—(Hear, hear). Lord CASTLEREAGH said he believed his Ho-. nourable and Learned Friend had said/lathing whic h . could bear the construction of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, (Mr. Brougham.) The only person from whom any thing had fallen, which could lead in any :henna to the supposition of the Hon. sad Gentleman ' Was himself.—trot be was niatake Le Xt supposed he expressed any disrespect fro the class of individuals 'in question; ibr he felt none. If any' number of persons, in a ddition to the inhabitants of a parish or division, were to have liberty to join a -Meeting, provided they took no part in the -t logs of the Meeting, then 50,000 persons Ili haps, meet, and thus they would. ave the ter Meeting over again. All the tumultuary Chime ter of the Manchester Meeting would not only hd permitted, but even encouraged. The only effect 4 Ouch a clause would be to leave both Magistraterind i , . e hi doubt what diey should do, and what thetJ should not do. :f. j• 4 Mr. STUART 'WORTLEY, though he conctur4 In opinion with his Noble Friend, could • not, at the same time, helpthiuising there was a great i clealie what hied falleft from the Honourable and Learned Gentleman. It was qf great importance that all pro-, ctedings at Public Meetings should be reported, tkkap they might know what passed at them. He , y, that the publication of the• prdteedings of late Meetings had, in his opinion; been of the 'blends' im i crtance. It had opened the eyes of j if anything were ti before the . ' • • • .... • • - • •,. • • . , i • • . • ofus the wa y their oreting to discise that sibjeet, at ti the publishing there proceedings.. . _ Mr. Kisaisno and Mi. W. SKIT" ShispOitesLitie Clause. Mr. MARTIN •(Of Galway) doubted ',be l t:her it would not be prudent to prevent repOrti of such Meetings from being published. .'• l ' . P P:t . ,4.• : a better thi s ST p U e A rrn ß i T ssio W n O of ß ß T e L ivrt Et eis tho to uth t a would be Meetings were introduced in a clause by 'itself. Lord CASTLEREAGH thought, if this permis sion were granted at all, it ought to be done by a separate clause. His Lcrdship considered it a very serious question.z-(Heer, Hear). 1 The motion was then negatived. Some of the tel .aa • ing clauses habing - teen gone through,, . • A conversation then took place on the reedi t * ni lef.the seventh clause, by which it is provided, that persons committing the misdemeanour therein -de: stfribed, shall be liable to two yeate imprisonment.. . Mr. DENMAN prop:hod to substitute, instead of two years, an alteration of the term to that of one year. • Mr. WM. SMITH supported this Amendment. The SOLICITOR GENERAL said, he was 'not aware of any objection to the introduction of a clause for this purpose, and to the providing that, after a limited time, no prosecution ihould be entertained. , Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that as he conceived the 'punishment's inflicted by our Courti of Justice to he as mild as the nature of the cases would permit, it might be conformable to their principles•of proCeed: 7 ing to mitigate in this initanee the penalty to one year's imprisonment, according to the Ainendment of the Honourable end Learned Gentlematt—The Amendment•was accordingly adopted. . Mr..W. SMITIA said be conceived it tirit hig h l f improper to proceed further at so late an hodr (past . one) in the morning, and moved that the Contunttoe . should repOrt progr ess.' Lord CASTLE REAGH observed, it was net art hour usually considered inconvenient for business: Mr. W. SMITH said lie felt it a public duty to endeavour to prevent matters of such ebnsequence to the Public being proceeded in at that hour, and he should take the sense of the House on the question. , • The Gallery was.then cleared for a division.—Yor the Adjournment, 34—Against it] 66—Majori t y,l SY: . Mn BROUGHAM said, he felt it hii dutrto sub mit a motion to the House, with the view •of pre ~ venting the subject before the House being.proceeded in at an hour when it could not be discussed: Lord CASTLEREAGH said, if the Honourable and Learned Gentleman spoke thesentiments of the Gentlemen of the party to which he belonged, it was no doubt possible for him to put a stop to further proceedings at that time. He could not help re membering, Inswever, • that in another stage of this Bill the HonourableGentletions had had no merty on the House at a much later hour—(Hear, hear I) If at a later hour the Honourable Gentleman could find • strength to speak for two hours, and te enter into a discussibn of several subjects, nbt very closely con nected with the question, bin could find no strength to go on any longer now—and if the Honourable and Learned Gentleman was surrounded by Gentlemen Alt such very feeble health that it would 'be very much einLingered by proceeding i farther with the business at that time, he- sup he should be obliged to give vfay to them. But - the House and the country, he• hoped, would not misunderstand the reason why he now put off the business, and would see that he ,had not done more than his duty in trying to proceed wjth a subject of so much importance to the country, with as little delay as possible—(Hear, hear). Mr. BROUGHAM said, when he took the trouble of detaining the House for two hours with a discus sion of what the Noble Lord had been pleased to tall many general subjects, he had only to state, that 1% did it. with very great and very unfeigned reluctance -. l (legr,hear, hear). He would repeat, that he did it with very, great - and very unfeigned reluctance=-: and he begged to state the reason why; It was not that he felt any reluctance in coming forward on that occasibn, to do that which the proper discharge of his duty demanded, but it was painful to him to ad- Arms the House, when he perceived he was speaking to- so great a number bf Members of Parliament,' who were so •impatient to listen to any opinions dif fering from their own. When he felt he was ad ' dressing a Room of CoMmonp who- writ determined at comp to pass the most severe.measures against their Constituents,-and, at the same time,' determined ' : not to hear one word in fafour . of those Con.;tititents-- 'ear, heat, Isear)..who, at the very time they were 'met to pass the most severe =mutes against Po' pular Assemblies, which they termed rabble routs, 'incapable of listening to discussion, affirming that rid discussion or deliberation was' known, except within thin wars, were themselves exhibiting an impatience discussion, which could hardly be eiceeded at any Meting wh atever ; for he did find, within the 'two during which he addressed the House? such pOseeedings on the part of the audience be was then addressing, as he bad seldom, if ever, witnessed uh the Most stormy hustings. That was the cause. of , the reluctlnce which he felt, whit% was sometimes mingled with shame for the conduct of those 'Amu he addressed-tharnighta The reason why he had ad. dressed the House at so late an hour was, that in Ho nourable Gentleman, not now in his place (Kr. 'Canning), but who, if he were to Jive a hundred years, would never make such a* observation .ps bad fallen from the Noble Lord tonight.-had ad dressed the House for nearly three hours. immedi- ~ ately before. It would, no doubt, have keen very convenient for the Noble Lord, that speeches on that side of the House should not be answered; but it did not square with his notions of ditty to leave that , speech unanswered.' He had no wish to throw &- stades in the way of carrying on the public business oltiettountey; but it was a matter of fact, that it was impossible' to go on any longer with the discus sion .06 the Whams clauses and nsost multifarious, ea which musainedfor them. 41e did impkne I deliberate • all candour Ware obits:leo ia die • ha acted had not and ab- rotative to A, ~ r _ • ;gleam as to ILS amnions; nu 'mumps .....-- .................—,________ __ •k stobe a Meeting to inflame the loyalty of country: He should be sorry if anything wee to mi tteri Whi c h reit amedf or t h ew 41e d i d it e; no matter whether it was a Meeting to occur to prevent laying such prciceedingt before the. the Rase. if they bad any disposition to delibe the Country against the inersion of a fo- country. He hoped, in some way or other, an •7 , - ;ii their alarm was not sash as to shut oat all cs my; no mutter atheism for any of these option weld be made for persons attendingg - for the ~ ~ thei r breasts--tie did i mp l ore t h em to I ; the Country were to know nothing of it. purpose of • I _Ling. ' . . . . •.. t ..; ; shut it was not with a view to throw obitacles sat a Magistrate reduced such a Meeting to Mt. mAnnu. Witnessed himself afoot; .•J; : . way of klinistan,- nor hem ill temper, that ha inefficacy. which, he believed in his • souls the publication ofd onts of the prOceed sof. , if Is, pow did, but. e i m ldy, b eam . they hi :5 Lord nevet intended, when he framed 'III hiss was of the uft*hlsisoftarste. blio -' ; aresisoh. Left to go on far th er with the diicossi cit,, c the exclusion of Hunt and a few others not approve 'of itimsdat!Pailliznente .00 ,..-:.: •, -- Ti c copiaitt“ then riposte d program. a I Meetings . If this clause were riot given up, Suffrage, he Was le 'Wife Reihntier . , I r . istotin * *. . rune sit, mai* tofday. • . rare they reduced? Were tha debatda at su the County to istichlsrbeiongedit a.-: , . , .ii a , 'pi' • : giliAlfposqxiiid his nodss news' to be reported? How were thej tobrinortlia? lent,' of tile PebPte ;11.WftWous leri , . . •. . :9-1 • . •,. : • ip, Prot•etwo, Thom ail to-wwww. . Pubis te depend apili the I.3td lailiolman! 'Alfons ; Odle thosiKlablfit)iitt , • 331 . ... :- , . ~. '. ,-;.. .e road a Two o'clocki '. :.. ."•' i ' .1 ' .;• . 1 ' • '4 • _ , • • . .• I ' . • , . • ./". 4 P11.'4"7 'F ] +~. . Ir ..; - .1 i , I ' t Alt., ) 1 n the. Ir. Cali years made_ the. 0, the cr e true, ' 4 5 to j - eca) )11 imn e Nob] s of of Wing Cries c was to an In Meeti Bill, ficer nglar 7s of '1 I / '