Star. — London, England, 1809-02-16 00:00:00

• I ,sad purposely put .them out of hi: possession, that he might assign that as a reaseni fqi not producing them. He was asked whether they were destroyed ? The reply was, that they retie • net; for he had handed them over to a friend. He had left the Noble Lord with a promise that he would immediately consult a Learned •Gentleetian; the late Solicitor General, to whom he would submit the business, fake his adiihe hOw_ to act,. and acettaipt the Noble- Lord with' the result • - ii - knifter past three.that day. The Noble Lord said *-he &tretided at the time and place appointed ; hut,. instead of `the man, he found a note' fron hint ; stating, that' his Learned Friend was preitessreiedly engaged before the Master of the Rolls,aandohe conld..not see him, but would take a speedy oppostmity of_consulting him, • and .would • act • aceerdihg lo the advice he, should. give him. The Noble. Lord said, he felt it his • dtityle communicate these eirtunistances iMtneate ly to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to move for the j production of those papers, and the attendance of th is Solicitor, for which he had already moved. • As' he' had not seen those documents, he could not say they would•bear directly on the case of the army ; but as' the disposal of places under Gevernment had been frequently mentioned in the course of this enneiry, and as he understood the papers in question bare di reedy upon that subject, he hoped there would be no objection to their production. When they sheald come before the House, he should suggest that, as in the case of the letters produced last. ntght,• a 'Select Committee should be appointed to examine them, and report to the House such opinion as they should form, - touching the mattereontained in them. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER hoped, that when • the Noble Lord • expected this threaty which tie alluded to, wouldbe kept in eternal , remembrance, a just estimate would be formed on the subject: The Noble Lord was right, as to the • seriousuess_with which Mr. Adam had urged the ex pediency of a speedy and 'public enquiry ; but he was very far from right, indeed, when he said that the Honourable Gentleman, with whom this proceed ing originated, had been forced to the present mode of prosecution. There was not, he was convinced, more than two, dissentient voices in the House, when the present 'mode Was proposed ; there was no undue interference in its adoption—no extraor dinary course—no secured majority : • but it Was pro ceeded in- by -one free ; unanimousoand appropriate consent. • The Noble Lord now urged the inconve niency of-a public inquiry ;" but he himself acquiesced in the moons on which it was at -first founded. He had not moved fcir a seleetCoinmittee, but merely- for a Committee-; and snob, no doubt, from his acquain tanse :and connection -with the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Wardle), he must have amceived -to be his desire and wish, It been agreedto hythe full consent -of the Houle; and it not dealing fairly - by the ac cused,- it wits not dealingfa*ly by & , e - House nor by him, now- to sendOforth so harsh- and unfounded an impvtatioeon their propriety, to the public. What, •vesti-40-righrto rely,- that the facilities' of • the accused had . been impeded; or his tourse interrupted, when, on the contrary, - every convenience had been afford ed, and every help -given which it was possible for ee-ere.e.- T eee °Elbe House to procure ? If every simi lar investigation were retrospectively viewed, it would be seen that there -never was an oceasiun on which -less obstruitioh had been given, or More aid afforded. Thisthe saw plainly was an attempt to prejudice the public mind against the present inquiry ; but he would oppeal even to the Noble Lord himself, could 'any thing be more plainly unanimous than a case in which not a single division had emoted ? He was well convinced, Worn what he knew of the Noble Lord, that he would be the very last man in the House either to give up any opinion of his own, or accede to 1 • the opinion of any other when he did 'not like it.— (Hear ! hear !) As to the rapidity with which this j proceeding had been conducted, he would only ob serve, that the Hen. Mover had had his own time for arrangement, and there certainly did not occur any instance, during the course of examination, in which he required any reasonable delay, that it was not granted. There had been no concluding period fixed, and where there had been a supposition that witnesses' could not attend, a conditional adjournment had been allowed. With respect to the so much'spokee of threat of infamy attaching to the accuser in case of failure, he must sayhe had heard of no such threat ; but he had heard, that if it appeared that this accusation had originated in a vile conspiracy, and had seen pro ceeded in on false and fabricated evidence, then, cer taii 1.- censure must fall somewhere. As to the unfair attack of which the Noble Lord complained, he was ready to say no* what he had said last night, namely, that the Noble Lord was very right in not referring to any particular case, until he knew whether or not he could produce the papers. But there had been no -stigma whatever cast upon him (Lord Folkestone). Ile certainly knew the Solicitor to whom the Noble lord had referred, but he must beg leave to declne the recollection of having done him any favour ; at least if he had, the gratitude of the 'person obliged , was stronger than his own memory—but the Noble I Lord had forgotten to tell, that When he called upon htui (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) in the morn ing, he had expressly hoped the/ no sense Of obliga tion in the Solicitor to him, would prevent the papers being produced, and the affair investigated. But the Noble,l,ord had gone 'very far* indeed, when he sta; ted that inyiermation of Officers competent to give it had been refused, for fear of Government's dis pleastee. It was easy for any man to see that this Was an attempt to create prejudice in the minds of the people . ; It was a' most unfair a,nd ungenerous' assertion. No new case was brought forwaftl, no new evidence produced ; but indeed it was said more ' cases are:fin - ore evidence could be pruddeed,v,-ere it not for e e eeOfGovertiment's displeasure. Was this just, or riebr or lend? Why, the Noble Lord should h a ve - at least delayed until he had investigated the cases,. • .and learned a little more moderation aid justice from the experience of his past errors in this very proceed lug. No doubt, at the commencement, he thoeght many cases very different indeed from what they af terwards appeared ; and how did he knoW that he had not made the same mistake as to.the future ones*, to which he now alluded ? The Noble Lord had better first fee the papers, as on former occasions, and t hen he could be a better judge as to whether the chi Mes could be substantiated, lie hoped the House e c otilltleieicuse the warmth with which he had spoken, but affroceitlekt from his interest in the subject; and a. . ..., 4 I,he should , ha &moldered - „him iatialept. . !Lora FOLK ,ily. with respect to the - new caw, they were numerous, but that 'this instance which could not be proceeo, of evidence 'arising from the. cause he had asslghed. I -As talhe charge of itifamy-:-Lhorepeate‘tliii , it had been asserted that infamy meat • fall sehiewhere—on the acetified, if guilty. valise-accuser, if he Could' not" substantiate his charges—(grer, hear !] The CHANCELLOR of the*EXCHEQUER —, " If there are Officers, who from such a cause will , not give information, why not call them to the bar of ' the'llouie, where they can be compelled ?" Lord FOLKESTONE--" Will the Right Hon. Gentleman inform me how I am to do that without. knowing, their names r , . Mr. ADAM rose in some warmth, and said, that he felt himself compelled to make some observations • on what he understood had fallen from the Noble Lord when he was not in his place.- He had heard that the Noble Lord had asserted, that the Honour able Mover of this business had been driven to his present course by " the professed adviser of the• Duke of York." Now he had always understood that it hid been the courtesy of the House to designate every one of its. Members by their proper or professional title. A mere, Member was called ' the Honourable Gentleman ;' a Privy Councillor,' the Right Honour-. able 'Gentleman ;' and -, a person -of his profession, i the Learned and Honourable. Gentleman.' He saw plainly the cause of the deviation in the present in stance. The Noble Lord had not chosen to say the • Learned Gentleman has forced 'the Hon.,Movei to 'this course, but the adviser of the Duktrof York has • done so. This was an assertion which he bail aright to counteract. He had undoubtedly his feeliiigs as a witness, but he certainly did not carry into that LI - louse any other principles than those by which a • Member should be influenced. He was anxious to repel the epithet -which had been attached to him. — He had in the course of a long life and arduous line of active duty, preserved an immaculate public cha i ratter ; and he defied any man to say, that in the I course of 25 years, he had ever deviated from the strict principles of integrity. . He had a growing and a young family—he had his character and his talents .alone to rely on—he had to struggle as much as any man, with the res angusta elomi ; yet that House could not produce a single instance in which he had desert ed his duty, or yielded to temptation. He had adop ted a Tine of independent conduct in the beginning of his life, and had uniformly adhered to it, scorning to barter that independence for interest. If, then, such had been his progress, it was a little too late now to make the House believe that be merged the charac ter of a Member in 'that of the Duke of York's ad viser: Hs bad a long intercourse with the illustrious Duke, and it was natural for him to take an interest in the method of proceeding. He had, therefore, stated his sentiments on the subject • at first strongly urging public i ty, and, as well as he could recollect, when the proposal for a public commission was made, there were but two dissentient voices in the House. He never attempted to stand in the way of a free and perfect inquiry, nor tried to obtrude his personal ad vice on the Committee ; but after being called Up . as . he had been now,' he thought it but justice to speak' his mind onenly, fairly, and fully to the House. . Lord POLKSTONE declared, that he certainly had applied the epithet of" learned" to the Learned Gentleman ; but at all - events he was sure that when: he called him the 0 adviser of the Duke of York,',' he did not mean to cast any imputation on his inte grity. Mr. CALCRAFT could not silently hear the. Noble Lord say that his Honourable Friend (Mr. Wardle) had been deserted by all the Committee, 1 except by him ; for his own part, if he felt himself 1 competent to the task, he was very willing to give his feeble aid. He must remark the manly course which the Honourable mover had chosen, standing as he did singly and alone. He had rested his credit on the case, and had proceeded boldly to the justifica.; tion of his charges. But he could not allow the Noble Lord thus to arrogate to himself superior merit to_the rest of the Committee. He had read, or knew very well he should read, the Noble Lord's panegyric in. a certain publication (a laugh) ; but he could not help saying it would come from any one with a much I better grace than from the Noble Lord himself. Lord FOLKSTONE said, he had not meant to pass a panegyric on himself ; he.had been misundet stood. The House then resolved itself into a Committee: I A. Member here said, that an unfavourable impres sion had been made on the public, relative to the ex- . pence of the establishment in Gloucester-place ; now he wished some fiicnd of the Duke of York's might be called in and examined as to that point. Mr. Thomas Walker was called but could not be I found. Mr. WARDLE said, as he had understood that I some suspicions had been sent abroad relative to the authenticity of the Duke of York's letters, whose writing had been only spoken to by Mrs. Clarke, he now wished.to have the matter put beyond . doubt. Sir VICARY GIBBS said he did not believe the writing had been denied in that House, and that when any Honourable Member brought forward a letter in the House, he generally substantiated it by as good evidence-as he could produce. Mr. William Macdowall . was called, but was not in attendance. He had received his summons-but a short time.. Mr: WARDLE wished to have the two letters of Samuel Carter to Mrs. Clarke read. Mr. LEACH suggested the propriety of proving the hand writing. . Mrs. CL A RKE was accordingly called in. Q. ( By Mr. WARDLE.) you know whose writing this is ? (shewing the letters of Carter). A. Yes, it is Samuel. Carter's.—Q. Have you ever seen him write ? A. Yes, often. [General CLAVERING'S and the Baroness Now- KEN's letters were here produced to the witness, and similarly identified.] Q. Did you ever. see Mr. Elderton ? A. Yes, I obtained for him the Paymastership of the Zed . Light .Dragoons.. -Q. Ate those letters his ? A. They are the letters of the elder Mr. Elderton. Witness ordered to withdraw. Mrs. CLARKS-- 44 I beg -leave -here to say a few words to the Committee ; Mr. Nicholl has said, that .1 lepresented myself as married to Mr. Dowler:—it bribe - •• should moose be, hailleetid'foi Witlidrew,:kand ,tits letters ; the we're Al dies tol locestor . iilace. Those rat Wed '2 _ L -- • • - t'li • • ." Hostinitun 1M AS write to. beg you will obtain me leave girince, without which I shall be reduced to a sad dilem . . ma. rise-Adjutant hassaid -141FaS0411VOTIltatregilglighlitritn1 0 3r , days, SO that iinksi I set leave , Tifsill arrest e d. I beg, ho-, 'toured...Madam, .the lhebur of A: line . fro you; to dispel my l fears, but not if it, could hurt year - 43 00 fuit id that. " " I remain;hotsoured Madam, &c. . •IbeeARTERP. ,ND. IL " HONOURED MADAM, "Isle of Wight. ' " I am' truly sorry that I have not as oppeetanity of thanking you personally for your benevolence. For your satisfaction, I. have set down a list of the eirphnces which I have unavoidably curred. I hope, honoured Madam, you will, extend your kind ness to Me as you may lee by the inclosed, the state of my purse. ) " Believe me, honbured Madam, &c. S. CARTER." No. 111. 66 *HONOURED MADAM, " Spithead. • " I hoPe humbly that you will pardon the libertrof this address —I am now on board,.and have been able to procure no stock 4 nor have I any money -1 am obliged to keep. watch for four hours tog - ether and to live on salt meat, the ship's allowance ; and the Tornio so . bad, it is Impossible to drink it. I hope, honoured Ma dam,' Ton will not suffer ate to starve in the, situation to which your bene,volence has raised me. I hope you Will save me from horrible.cOntrition, and do ass att. swede .t Believe Me t hoovered Madam, &C. SAMUEL CART/R. " The Baroness Nolckeu's letters were here about to be read, when Mr. LEACH expressed his doubts of the propriety of their being read, as they related to a civil appoutl went. Mr. WHITBREAD slid it would be better to leave that point for future discussion, and proceed t 6 'read General Clavering's letters, as they stood next in order. • The Clerk accordingly proceeded to read them. No. I. " Mr DEAR MRS. CLARKE., • "Bishop's Waltham. . " Where your note has beeu travelling 1 cannot guess, for it has , only just arrived here; however, I console myself In the hope of •a snore fortunate time.—Yours, dear Mrs. Clarke, " M. CI AVERING:' Na 11. " Mr DEAR MRS. CLARI7E, --- "Bishops Waltham• " From what you mentioned of the Duke of York, do not e think he has a proper comprehension of my meaning. By the Defence Act, men are not compelled to serve out of the United Kingdom, and but till six months after peare. I wl*h to raise a battalion for general service, and to have it officered from the half pay list. Do get the Act and read it, and do all good things and on good terms.—Yours. " H. M. CLAVERING." No. UT. " Mr ,ISR AR MRS. CL ARX E, " Bishops Waltham. " I certainly shall not pursue the partridges on the Ist of Sep tember. 1• shall be at the Prince of Wales's Coffee-house in my , boots, at shr o'clock. Receive me in this dress it' you can, and as much later than that time as you choose. —Believe, dear Mrs. Clarke, H. M. CLAVERiNG." - • • Glaring that he I . possession, that h iimself cu I shout 4 - el4lanati. witness here did nocAa A ;C:. to read the le t lilts not t rs:Clirke. Gloom proceeded in frOm • • from, amuel Carter . • 1 • No. IV. " MY DEAR MRS. CLARKE, " I write this to thank you for your attempt - to serve me, al-. ough it has not been successful. I beg, if possible, that you will contrive to meet me on Tuesday next. " Dear Mrs. Clarke, your s, No. V. " 11• M. CLAVERING: " MY Dial MIL CLAnni...-1 Wish you would see respecting the new regiments. " a sa. CLAVEIUNO." Mr. LEACH objected to the reading of Mr. El derton's letters now, as they only referred to a Pay mastership, which might not have been obtained through the. Duke of Toth.. At all events, it would be best to tali in Mrs. Clarke, and.ask her that gees thin. Mrs. CLARKE Calkd in, and examined by - lir. WARDLE. Q. By whose interference did you get the Paymas tership for Elderton ? A. The Duke applied to Greenwood to get it for him, very much against Green wood's wishes. —Q. Was it on a military• subject that the Baroness Nolcken wrote to you ? A. On what subject was it ? The witness was ordered to t‘ithdraw. Mr. LEACH, we believe, objected to the question, but he was nearly inaudible. Sir G. WARRENDER said, that many que';tions had been asked during the enquiry on subjects not merely military, as in the case of 1)r. O'Meara, and he slid not see why the usual course should now be stopped. Mr. BATHURST said, that if the application from the Baroness Nolcken related to a civil appoint ment, it could not possibly be admitted as evidence on an inquiry which was purely of a military nature. Sir GEORGE WARRENDER was still of opi nion, that the question was as proper .as many others that had been put in the course of this investigation. Mr. LEACH observed, that Mrs. Clarke had al ready.answered that the appointment solicited by Ba roness rgleken, was not a military one, and as the present investigation was merely military, conse quently that the question was not a proper one to be pressed. Lord FOLKESTONE was forcibly struck Ad; the objection started by the Learned Gentlg*Ln upon the floor (Mr. Leach), and therefore thought, Ikat with a view to discharge the duty they ()Jived the.rtblic, the Chairman should be instructed, on the breaking up of therCommittee, to move for an enlargetnent of • its powers. Mrs. Clarke was then called in and asked— Q. Did you, iii consequence of the Baroness Nolc ken's letters, apply to the Duke of York on the subject to which the letters referred ? A. I did ; but I do not know whaethe subject is, as the Baroness had several wishes. I Mewed all the letters to You stated that the- Duke of York procured the Pay mastership against the wish of Mr. Greenwood ; how do you know that ? A. His Royal Highness told me so. Very likely Mr. Greenwood will say so too. On the suggestion of Mr. LEACH, the letters were sheivn to Mrs. Clarke, to *certain whether they were in the hand-writing of Baroness Nokken. The wit; ness declared Nos. 41 and 119 to be the hand-writing of the Baroness; but stated No. 127 to be that of her eldest son. Q. (By Mr. LEACH.) Did you ever see her eldest son write ? A. I think I have, but I am not positive. I only know that the Baroness has told me that her eldest son used to write letters frequently for her. Q. (by Mr. STURGESS Botlisr.) I wish to know whether this letter, which you now say is the hand writing of th Baroness's eldest son, was not one of those you before said was the hand-writing of the Baroness ? A. Yes, but you must allow that I had not a moment to loo k over it. I had sent them with others down to be burnt, and never thought that they wouldjle brought forward, and that is near twelve months sinee.--Q. Do you mean the Baroness's eldest son. Mr. Lemaitre A. No; I mean Gustavus Nolcken.—Q. Have ritt ever seen him write Yes, I think I have, but I am not positive. Q. (By a Member.) Do you mean to say that letters were written about twelve months ago ? No. I suppose the dates will shew when they w written. 14 last Do you 4cne* the . h.,, 1 ;3Niieing-Wafter ro ets ?. A. MI was acquainted with two sons of 'the Baroness : as. itasiaa4aatiist -tlie Inunger lived with mother, and I 0;4. to ibe .. very .much with in c .. Thep...von .t-Vift(it' a positive as - to :the Inind-w; tof any one in . rittioniar ? A.' No, /*cannot. Ptr:l it may be-the hxnd-nritlng of the Baron, as lie to write letters for the Baroness. Q. (By the CHAtramr.on of the ExeitEoi.-- , , R . short. yod •dbret.knovr whose htincl.writing ti :c is ? A. I.dtin't know perfectly. • khardly have k at it, but I know • the subject of it. The Barr wished to obtain a.pension of A. 400 a-ye;;r. recollect right, that was the business to which ter related. The witness was here ordered • to withdntw rn motion of Mr. LEACH, who observed, that it the Committee to decide wh.tther the lett er w, s tlenceiand-tmtil the ComMittee should so decid, , it. was improper for the witness, to state the sal, of it. lie therefbre shOUld• move that the last :{r. be expunged, as ir the letter should .be decidLd evidence, it would be read as such. • Sir THOMAS TURTON was of opinion, tha n answer might not to be expenrd. Mr. CHARLES ADAMS thought, th a t, n , letter had, amongst others; been. referred last ni.,71 atommittee, to ascertain which related to the ' ness then in a course •of investigation, and hau produced by that Committee, he could not see v. should not he read• as evidence. --The -GHAT RMA.N.,.referring to the report c: Committee, stated, that the Committee had not : any . opinion, whether the letters are now, or were after,•to -be considered ; admkiible evidence. Mr. C. ADAMS considered them as admi evidence. - - ------- Sir T.. TURTON declared, that unless norm tierstandit‘g..should be come to about it, feel it his duty to take the sense of the Commit. the question for expunging the last answer, Honourable Member should persist in presin7 The.answer 'was allowed to remain:on the Mi The Letters of Mr. Elberton were then read Friday, January " My dear Madam—Nothing should induce me to on your attention at the present moment, but the natural of a - parent for the welfare of s child. My son Charier., *fine youth, has finished his edutation, and has obtained ship in an Infantry *egiment in the esdia service. • I ha , quest, as a particular favour, that you will have the kin, beg of his.Rpyal Highness the Duke of York to recommi to Lord William lientiss‘k and . Sir John Craddock, and Royal Highness Will request. those . Generils to allow rnl exchange from the Infantry to the Cavalry. This intern mr dear Madam, I shall esteem as a distinguished ohl and it will ever.be impressed on the mind of Charles v liveliest sense of gratitudea--I remain your's most sinetn " " Greenwood has heats from Scotland; all is over • quarter." " To Mra. Clarke, &c." Ftbrtm " My dear Madatn..—You are a stranger to anxiety, as you ever Will be, or! do net think you would have left Saturday without haVing Informed me of the result of your , Lions in favous of my son. Charles. Darden, I-beseech-you, impatieace of a father, whose rmtlety-Is raised for the intern• a beloved son. His Royal Highness, I understand, will be on Monday evening; probably you will be enabled to oln. answer and forward it to ms• on Tuesday morning. " Your's, most sincerely, my dear Madam, "To Mrs. Clarke, Btc." " Hamar ELDER • - " Api " Sir—lt is infinite!y beyond my power to express my gratitude for the favour your Royal Hlghntss has beengi pleasekto grant my son, and for having obtained leave of tor him from Sir Robert Abercrombie. Your Royal Hi t coudescensionand goodness' has made an indelible imprec my n.iud, and will be ever felt with gratitude. I am, Sir (Signed) • " Hasty ELnei " To His Royal Highness the Duke of York." The letters of Baroness Nolcken were then The first was signed M. Noleken, and datec . gate,express'ng a hope that his Majesty would uue to the Baron the same kindness which manifested towards him for forty years past. The next was as follows Dear Madam,. 5 , ..e by the Papers of yesterday, that the-Duke had an interview with the King, and that Mr. Pitt had al: Terence: I atn anxious to know how my letter was receit was there, and am full of antiety to knew the result. sand tharlic for the carp you have soat me.—Yours, &c. "To Mrs. Clarke., (Signed) "M. i%lot.c The CHANCEI.I.CR of the EXCHE( threw it out as a matter for the consideration Committee, that the letter addressed to the D otk had not been sealed. It appeared to hay intedded for the Duke, but committed to the of lifts. Clarke. - - The CHAIRMAN having asked whether al letters were to be read, and it appearing that ni were then to be produced, THOMAS WALKER was called in and exami by Mr. WARDLE. Q. Have you lived with Mrs. Clarke in G: ter : place, as footman ? A. I have.--Q. Do collect a footman of the name of Samuel Car: lived there ? A. Yes.—Q. Was he in the ci habit of waiting at dinner while you was then Yes.—Q. Do you know Miss Taylor ? A. YI --Q. Have you frequently seen her at Q 10; place ? A. Yes.—Q. Do you know rat Carter - was in the Imbit of going 'o6lnd:the c A. He was. Q. (By Lord FoutssroxE)—Were you head man at Gloucester-place ? A. I was.---Q. Ho' horses were kept? A. Sometimes six and soi eight.—Q. How many carriages ? A. Were there never more ? A. Not at one tim , Do you know who provided the carriages ? Clarke.—Q. Did she pay the bills ? A. As know, she did.—Q. Did she pay them throe A. No, not through me. - Q. (By Mr. Yonim).—Did Samuel Cartel livery ? A. No; he did not.--Q. Did he table ? A. He did ?—Q. How do you kno' A. I waited the tame time.—Q. Did y wait when the Duke of York was at Gh place ? A; I did.—Q. Did you wear'a lives you waited at table ? A. I did not. Q. By Mr. CHARLES Anama. r —Did Sam , ter attend behind the carriage, without w. livery ? A. Yes, he did.—Q. Had Mrs. Cl livery servants ? A:-Yes, - her footman.-12. wear a livery when ;( u drove the carriag certainly did. •• rite lived o‘ . y that ti.t. ago ? A they wc re ohs the. har..d. A. Mr. 1• :mess: tcl with Li, 11461 1011 A. Per:li; s : *MO CeSS sci the lave 1 ( ..: ; 11.0! r.! the; 2tiltt:3 •;. thal t.t. t It • roes !raw rn it NQS for TS: ter w• s t ri . eve i dec iLi •, le sni, taco, gal List ititsv.-- :cidtd fi e ` fl'4l ion, that • MI that, a s 1c last ti the nd hau at See V::,t* it fir eport ef ad not )r were h:Lt.:. ce. di s admi3s',l.l.) aB th ess some th 'ornmittee 1 resLini* . the L'Niiia;tiis, •n read : tanuary Ish. te me to trt.pa l natural att:::cy V x‘!", : , i s rained a Cat'et- . • I have tt:; : . the kindct.--s , ecommzt:d tut 2 ck, and that Lis t low my S.JII t, his inv.:l:Cal:nu, bed obligation ; 1 tutees with t sincirtly, Is over in chi February 2. itiety, as I tr..st we left town ca alt of your (tier. iessiechiou, tlt t the interettzi ,will be in led to obtain an I ig- Madam, ELDERTON." " April 17. mess my sei , .e beenErneim..iy leave of absence loyal Highness's le impression (a I am, Sir, &c. ELDERTO re then real. d dated Mat- would corn:. ohich he had past. r'Duke of 'VA A had also it tit. as received, wl.t. result. A tiles- ws, &c. F. Not.cr.LN." :CHEQUER :ration of 112 ) the Dulzo. or to have 1)0:7: :o the custody :ther anymore that no mere I examined e in Glouc. - ; . - . Do you tel Carter v.•:. , ) the coristat.: is there ? t• A. Yes, I C-- 11 GIOUCe! ,• c.T . rat i earri,:gti )U head coac . - Q. How mare and somcrim. A. Two.—i:` one timc.— ges ? A. I\ Li • As far at through Carter wc:r id he wait DU know that' Did you cv•:: it Glouceit.. livery Samuel C.:: lilt w.mi rs. CI Lrloi Did rriag • ? L