Star. — London, England, 1809-12-12 00:00:00

had contradfctect h'ca, and bad if It had sin. His drift was, that it iris to :ontrive the very moment for Daniel WI ielit's appearance. Colonel Wardle was softened, and Major Dodd begged that for GOD'S sake Colo nel Wardle would do something. It was, therefore, wisely contrived that Mrs. Clarke should be assisted without the appearance of Cohncel Wardle's neme. Major Dodd knew Mr. Illingworth, and proposed to give his acceptance for 4300, and to take Mrs. Clarke's note for that sum payable four days before Mr. Illinvorth's acceptance became due, so that she might first take up her bill out of the funds she was to receive from the sale of her boOk. It was further contrived to get Mrs. Clarke, as she was but a slipper-woman, a bill of sale of her goods, as a col lateral security. Mr. Illingworth consented to this arrangement from his knowledge of Major Dodd and his ft lend Colonel Wardle ; but Co lonel Wardle said to Mr. Illin&worth, 66 y ou shall run no Tisque ; here is our security besides, and if she fails, we will pay you out of our own pockets." When the time came, as might be expected, Mrs. Clarke did not pay the bill, and Colonel Werdle and Major Dodd did.— The Colonel and the Major would prove this ; aid the Major was to honourable man, lately holding an appointment under Government of R5;090 per annum, which the Learned Counsel lamented to say he liad now lost. It had been /lint ed to him, that if he gave the testimony he had given before the Grand Jury, his place would be his own no longer. But to his honour be it spoken,. be pteferred the tritth to his own interests he eient before the grand Jury ; he rave his testimony ; and," oh, shame ! where is thy blush i" the very next day lie was cashiered. The Learned Counsel ap plied to Major Dodd the speech of Fabricius to the Carthaginian General ; and said he was content, like Cineinnatus before him, to live in humility and purity ; he could put down his equipage, and accom modate himself to those circumstances, which he had b Core accontmodeLed to himself. The Learned Connsel now came to the third period of these trans. actions. From the I fith of December, till last June, no application to Colonel Wardle had been made for payment of Mrs. Clarke's goods. Then, however, came Francis Wright's bill with a note to Colonel Wardle, begging its speedy discharge, " as it was a' ready money account." A readymoney account, and yet , no demand of payment made before, notwithstanding the avowed distress of the house, and the refusal from. Colonel Wardle to Daniel Wright to make himself responsible for Mrs. Clarke's debts, by advancing her ,C5OO on her note. Would this distressed man have waited six months without demanding payment of a ready money account ? He proceeded against Colonel Wardle for the bill then, however, and with the as sistance of Mr. Stokes, his attorney, in five short weeks obtained a verdict against the prosecutor by foul conspiracy. Who, after this, would talk of " the law's delay ?' The letter to Colonel Wardle, which accompanied Francis Wright's bill, would alone con vince any impartial person that he had never trusted Colonel Wardle. The Learned Counsel courted the Attorney General, for the defendants, to put the chief ;uggler into the box to dayhe who was behind the curtain of alt this machinery—he who was looking for a situation, for which he was unqualified ; and then he would " a tale unfold."—{The ATTORN EY - C ENERAL said, without risen"; from his seat, that he had not the slightest conception of what was meant.) —lt would have confounded the strength of 99 Her cules's in S 9 dflys, to have met a conspiracy like this; and it was thought, by certain individuals, that if that fair fame which no other means than conspiracy could destroy, could be blasted at this expence, it was a cheap purchase. The action against Colonel Wardle was commenced for no other purpose than to tear that laurel from his brow, which the Learned Coun sel was convinced the verdict of the present day would only bind the firmer. “ quod optantidirum promittere nem* " Auderet, volvt.nda dies tra attulit ultro!" Mrs. Clarke, in her evidence, said, that she intro duced Colonel Wardle to Francis Wright, saying, " this is the Gentleman who is to furnish my house ; ' that Wright made no reply, but that she believed he heard her ; and Daniel Wright swore he believed so too. But if this had been the case, would not Francis Wright have said he was thankful, and have asked Colonel Wardle whether he did undertake this or no ? Was it likely that any tradesman, without a word from Colonel Wardle, would have given credit for , one guinea, much less for £2OOO. She also swore I that this, that, and the other article was pointed calt,l and that a carpet was produced, when it was swc:rn distinctly by both witnesses that Mrs. Clarke wished for a pattern that Major Dodd did not like, and that his taste was scarlet and bronze. " I yielded it to his f taste," said Mrs. Clarke. " and said, as you are to I pay for the carpet, I'll even take your Aioice." And ( was a lady then, whom the prosecutor indulged in every thing she liked, not to be indulged in the chlice of a carpet ? And becahse her's was less expensive, forsooth, " niggardly" Colonel Wardle, as she after wards called him, persuaded her to take a carpet of more value against her own will. Colonel Wardle too, had told her that while she was upstairs be had i ordered a mere expensive sideboard to be sent in to her, and her present one to be returned. This Was the act likewise of the " oiggardly" Colonel Wardle! This surely was not the natural act of a niggardly per-, son ; and it questionable if any person, however' generously disposed to his mistress, would have done this. The Learned Counserihen came 'to the contra diction in the evidence of Mrs. Clarke and Daniel Wright, as to the goods sent to Westbourn4litce be fore her acquaintance with Col. liigardle. ' Mks: Clarke said these were returned; and Daniel Wright said they were assigned to the credit of Colonel Wardle:"p6th these accounts were false ; but each contradicted the other. Mrs. Clarke knew enough of law to be acre that if furniture, the credit of which* bad once bail, • given to her, were assigned to that of Colonel Wail dle, a very wholesome statute of Charle s 'I. had re quired that the undertaking of the assign(.` should be . in writing. .Ecit Daniel Wright, not seeing; the point of law, s aid at once that the credit was a s signed - to Colonel Wardle. The Learned Counsel shoiild proVe that the credits were ever and anon entered in Fran cis Wright's books to Mrs. Farquhar, * and not to Colonel Wardle. - This would appear' upon the face r ,-, k= , c). the books, which had been veriiied upon oath in the Court of Chancery ; and the name of Mrs. Far. • qaoar wat neither more no less than a substitute for spat ei;ligis:'Cliiice..* ( DinierWright had therefore 1 , 'iiltT teicttd ter, ancnai sworn falsely on his owe Veiag at Westbourne Place when a mirro r Iva; ? N I tdu :hewing ; she . .. . - observati on falsely on the Learned Counsel's spew i ng . That these , say that it was to corruption more than the sword that brought . iever, _ never made a ny g oods w ere on hire and not sold was another . false- Bonaparte owed his present elevation. The Learned to a nurture—Did you ever make any a servat i i hood. The Learned Counsel held in his hand the Counsel concluded, with putting it to each of the Ju- respecting a writing-desk ? Yes ; I rementherseeil counterpart of a poliel of insurance by the Westmin- tors to execute his trust in such a manner as would a writing-desk, and I observed I never saw any this ster Fire Office for the furniture in Wesbourne.place, enable him to return to the bosom of his family with so ill finished as the workmanship was, particular and this insurance was made in the name of Far- satisfaction, and always to recollect the words of the the back - part.—Did you ever object to the expen.. quhar, at the same time that the policy expressed on immortal Nelsen, " Zngland expects every man to do of it ? No, I never knew the expense of it. —Wh en the very face of it, that if any insured property was his brie" was the first demand made on you by Francis Wrig . possessed by the assured only in trust, it must be .so EVIDENCE FOR THE PROSECUTION. for payment of the account of the goods and fun expressed in the policy, or else it was void. Francis John Ellis produced the examined copy of the re. ture for the house at Westbourne Place ? On ! Wright must have known of this ; and there fore the cord between Francis Wright, plaintiff, and Gwillym lst June.—Was there ever any application made policy was void, if what his brother said was true.— Lloyd Wardle, defendant, on which a verdict had been you for money before that ? The first applicati The goods must, therefore, have been sold, and not given for the plaintiff for 41095 ifs. 5d ; and with the was made by Major Glennie aim= the middle o f le hired ; and both the witnesses were perjured. Mrs. costs, amounting to 41194, which verdict was ob. , cember. I had afterwards a conversation with bl C. had sworn further, that she became first acquain- mined on the 20th Nov. 1809 ; and in which cause Clarke on the subject, who pressed me to lend ) ted with Colonel Wardle in the autumn of 1808 ; Mrs. Mary Anne Clark and Daniel Wright, the plain- 4500, oe to procure it for her. She stated, t h at 7, , and when pressed by the Learned Serjeant (Best) to i tiff's brother, were sworn as witnesses for the Plaintiff. Wright, the upholsterer, pressed her very hard say what she considered as autumn, said from Sep-1 James Dowling read from a copy of his notes, taken money ; that she owed him £5OO or 4600 a e Ember .to November; in order that it might raise aI i n short-hand on the said trial, the evidence of Mrs. ' time.—lf you had advanced her money, wont, presumption that Colonel Wardle knew at the goods Clarke and Mr. Daniel Wright. have been to pay that debt ? Certainly; if I 1 which had been sent in on hire on the 11th of No-/ George Sturdy, one of the sworn Clerks in Chan- done so, it would have been to pay a demand vember. The Learned Counsel should by other facts ! eery, attended, by direction of the Master of the Rolls long existing.—Do you remember 1). 'Wrigh t b e contradict both the witnesses, from beginning to end, ! with the original bill filed by Colonl Wardle against i in company with you and Mrs. Clarke, %rhea t l and prove, by a cloud of witnesses , eleven or twelve Francis Wright, and the answer of the said Francis I subject was mentioned ? Yes; I remember D al of whom he should call, that their whole fabrication Wright thereto, which answer appeared to be sworn Wright beirigwith us, and I rather think it was was false. There had been a pretended story about 'on the 31st October, 1809. The answer was then that day.—What did you say to Mrs. Clarke on / a mirror, upon which Colonel Wardle flew into such ' read by Mr. Lowton and other Gentlemen, and par- subject ? My answer to Mrs. Clarke was, I co; l a passion that the man had nearly let it fall. Where ported to be the substance of what had been sworn on nut do it. Daniel Wright pressed me very much,, was the man ? Why was he not produced ? If he the said trial. well as Mrs. Clarke, to lend the money, as they wen hod appeared then, the Learned Counsel would not , M r . J ames Dowling having retired, was again cal. very much distressed for money. I answered agaii have appeared now. The mirror-cat rier was not l e d. The Aeroneey-GENERAL requested leave of it is impossible ; I cannot do it. Mrs. Clarke, how, produced, however, and it would only have rfflec:ed Lord Eeereuonouou to ask Mr. Dowling a question, ever, continued frequently to press the same poin' upon the credit of their story if he had been—that was, which being granted, Mr. GARROW asked him if he At last I spoke to Mr. Glennie, as he knew Sir Re if any such mirror-cattier had ever existed. It might took the whole trial ? Answer, he did.—Q. Did Mr. ard Phillips, to see if he would lend her 4500 o n , be answered, as a reason why Colonel Wardle's Dowling recollect that Serjcant Best, who was to have work, which she had before told me she intended name was not entered in Francis Wright's books, that led the cause on the part of the defendant, was not in publish. An arrangement was afterwards m l the Colonel, being engaged in the investigation in the , Court at the beginning of the trial ? A. Witreess re- through Mr. Illingworth, a wine-merchant in ' House ct Commons, did not choose his name should mem b e red he was not.—Q. Did he recollect triat the Mall.—Was any counter-security gieen by you be mentioned, and Mrs. Farquhar's was used in- : Attorney-General challenged - the defendant's Counsel Mr. Illineorth ? Yes, there was, but it is not • stead : and yet, during this investigation, Colonel ,to examine Major Dodd ? A. Recollected words to in existenco. Wardle was incautious enough to go with a woman ; that effect.—Q. Did he recollect, that after Serjeant (By the" ATTORNEY Getizaite,) Where is it . of the town to hereupliolsterer's ! If Colonel War- ' Best arrived, the Attorney-General repeated his chi- believe I destroyed it at the time it was paid.—Wb ; die had desired tozive her a hquse full of furniture l e nge, and said that he wished them to examine Ma- was that counter-securitT? tt was 2 bill for 4251 in secrecy, would he not have gone elsewhere to have : jor Dodd, for that he ( Major Dodd) would make out drawn ' by Mr. Illingwurth on me, and acee, provided it? If the furniture had been a bribe for 1»s case ?A. Reco llected the substance of such ed ; and another bill for the same sum, drawn be her evidence, surely he would have purchased it : challenge. same person, on Major Dodd, and accepted, ma, rough a friend, and paid for it immediately. Coked W tiatoLE calla—Examined Ly Mr. GLEADE. in the whole the arm of xBso9.—Did you ever Having now proved the falsehood of this conspi - Q. You live in James-street, Buckingham-g ate, iI , Francis Wright at Westboutne-plaee ? Yes, oar racy, the Learned Counsel should state to the Jury ! believe ?A. I d o. — Q . You were a Colonel n the I twice.—Did you ever make him any promise to who he should call as his witnesses, and what they ! a rmy, I believe S A. I was Lieutenant-Colonel in Sir him for the furniture, or that you wood take the would prove. He should call Colonel Wardle, W. W. Wynne's Regiment of Fencibles.—Q. When meat on s ourself, or any thing like it ? Nevei. who would appear that proud and honourable : did you first know Mrs. Clarke ? A. On the 18th of you recollect receiving a letter from Mrs. Cl ar k e a; character which he had always supported. He ! November, 1808.—Q. You formed an acquaintance the 14th of May ? Yes, Ido ; I have it in my p oe would say, that the whole fabrication was false; : with her in order to obtain information from her re- —How did you receive that letter, by post of of , that he had never, in any way whatever , con- specting an inquiry you were going to set on foot ? wise ? By a private hand. reacted to pay for Mrs. Chu ke's furniture. He had '; I did;—Q. Where did she then reside ?A. At No. 14, . [Colonel Wardle produced the letter, which indeed proposed a public subscription for her, and i Bedford.place.—How soon after did Mrs. Clarke re - i put in—there was no direction on it, nor any envel mentioned the name of a respectable banking-house, ! move to Westbourne-place ? Nine days or a fortnight. j The letter was read by Mr. Lowten, and was to which would receive such subscription. At either of Did you continue to visit her in Westbourne-place ? 1 effect ; that when Mrs. Clarke sent for him the his visits to Wright's, Colonel Wardle had done I did.—Did you ever, from the 18th November-to the , day, and when he came, accompanied by nothing more than admire where his opinion was ; Ist December, promise any thing respecting payment I Dodd, they seemed to wish to get rid of the pro: asked. The next witness would be Major Dodd, who • for the furniture furnished by Wright ? Never.—Did, that had been made to her, but that she expected would appear before the Jury, in a high, proud, and any thing pass on that subject Yes ; I had some I would act as men ought to do, and that, conforms& manly state ; and, after hi; late instance of noble-lconversation with Mrs. Clarke. She told me she was !to those promises, he and Major Dodd would e mindedness, indeed he fully deserved to have his name ! furnishing a house in Westbourne-place, but did not ' into a bond to pay her £lO,OOO in two years, to , aced on some pillar, on which should be inscribed, ' say-who the upholsterer was.—Did you attend on the 1 her 4500 a year till then, and pay the remainder this is erected to an honest man." He should also,llst December with Major Dodd or Mr. Grant , of Bar- i Wright's bill. In giving her this bond, she would in case of any impeachment of the testimony of Ma- ! nard's Inn ? I did. Did Mrs. Clarke accompany !no gainer, for she had taken her son from under , ,14 jor Dodd, call a high and noble personage, the Duke you there ? She did.—Did any thing particular occur patronage of the Duke of Yea ; and in other *respects of Kent, and he was desired by the Duke himself to that day respecting Mrs. Clarke ? Either on going or she had lost so much that it would not be more' make this appeal to his Royal Highness. An oppor- , returning, Mrs. Clarke proposed to call upon the up. an adequate compensation. She kept a copy e, tunity would then offer itself of clearing his Royal ; holsterer in Rathbone-place, who was then furnishing letter to use as she might think propel, according . , Highness from the imputation of fomenting any fa. I her house in Westhourne-place. I agreed to it, and , they conducted themselves. 3 . mily dissention, which had been supposed to exist' the coach drove to Francis Wright's. Mr. Dodd, j Was the tfame of the Duke of Kent ever • between those illustrious brothers, who, lived in I Mrs. Clarke, and I went into the house—Who did i tinned before Mrs. Clarke ? The name of the . friendship stow, and who would live in the memory of j you see ? Daniel Wright.— Was any other person .of Kent was never mentioned before Mrs. Clarke, after ages. Hie Royal Highness did not know Co- I present ? I don't believe any other person was pre. I tached to any promise, or any of the promises enurra lonel Wardle, nor had he ever seen him. • 1 sent.—What passed on your first entering ? On our' rated in that letter. The Learned Counsel should also call Mr. Glennie, a I first coming in, Mrs. Clarke pointed out some furni- 1 Grespexamined by the Areceiniet-Gibieoee. man who, like Major Dodd, had been deprived of a i cure which I understood was preparing for her house. So t hen the Duke of Ke n t ' s name teas never appointment of 17s. or 18 s. a day because he I —Were you introduced to Daniel Wright as the per. , as attached to any promise whatever, or as , a 1 I had chosen to do his duty to Goa and man. He son who was to pay for such furniture for her house ? i i or interested in any way ? Never.—.-You have should then call Mr. tull, whqo let Mrs . Clarke the verdict against you, Colonel Wardle, for itle I was not.—Was any thing said by her that could ! l house in Holies-street; Cavendish -square, and a wo. ! induce such a belief in the mind of D. Wright ? No. ° upwards 1 I take it for granted I have. —Takin) man, who was witness to the agreement between the I thing.—ln what way did Mrs. Clarke conduct her.' for granted WOIA do : don't you know that you hay parties. He should also call Mr. Curt, whose house i self ? She shewed some furniture, which, she said, I suppose so.—Did you not know before you c - • in Westbourne-place had beep hired from him by the I was for her house ; particularly some curtains which, to char g e these p eo p le with a cons p irac y , that same conspiracy, and who' . e*vould prove, what the ! she said, came from her house in Gloucester-place. money must be paiu ? I supposed it must.., Learned Counsel had not Mentioned before, that She aloe pointed out some chairs which were new, paid ? I presume it is not paid.—You i-..rve not Francis Wright had paid hint two quarters rent sub- and, I understood, they were for her.—Was any thing it ? I have not.--You liVe in James-street, do sequent to the acquaintance of Mies. Clarke and Co. i further pointed out to you ? Yes ; she shewed some Yes. I do.—ln a house of your own ?In a *se lonel Wardle ; and yet she swore that the Colonel ; paintings en velvet, and stated, that Wright was to , have a lease of.—The furniture year own ? Yes, paid for every thing she wanted. He should then , get them matched for a sopha.—Any thing further ? the furniture is my own.—Has no execution been call some of the people employed to'repair the house ! Yes : some c ar p e t s were p roduced. —Did y ou - give put into this house ? No, not that I know of. — e in Westbourne.place, who would toil the Jury that; any opinion on these carpets ? I gave no further opi- 'What was there nothing put in the house? I be. * they were employed by Francis Wright, And, lastly , I Dion, but merely which was the prettiest.—Did you lieve there was a paper left these. .-What prevents he should call Sir Richard Phillips, a man of upright I differ with Mrs. Clarke in opinion respecting the car- the execution being pue. in the house ? I can't say ; the character, ard who had lately served the " offce of ; pets ? I did not.—Did Mrs. Clarke make any decla . proceedings are in the hands of my legal advisers.- - Sheriff of l e cuion and Middlesex. He was the book- 1 ration that as the carpets were to be paid for by you, What, I suppose to set aside the payment ? I don't .o seller applied to by Mrs. Clarke to purchase her I she would give up he r taste to y ours ? No ; never.— know ; I believe it is in equity.—How do you kree memoirs, for which he offered £3030, but she stated I Did you select any articles, or conduct yourself as it is in equity ? I can't explain, but I know processes that as she had to pay Francis Wright se2ooo for furni- jif you were to pay for them ? Never.—How 10 , g are pursuing, and the persons concerned for me at'e ;r ture, she must have £7OOO. This Sir Richard refused ; were you in Wright's house ? Half or perhaps chute equity.—So then if you convict these person:, you :'-' to give, and the negociation broke off. The Learned : quarters of an hour.—And at the end of that time, hope to get rid of the verdict ? I can't answer ;Ido t Counsel would however go further ; and lest any die.; yon left the house ?We did.—Did you go toWright's know enough of the business to say hoe- it may ha7e credit or doubt should fall on Sir Richard's testimony, , again on the '2d of December ? Yes ;on that day 1 that effect, hut I hope so.—Am Ito understand thee would call Mr. Sullivan, who was acquainted with i WAS to visit Mr. Donovan ; -Mrs. Clarke accompa- you are not without hope you may convict these per the whole transaction ; £lO,OOO had afterwards been nied me, and she proposed to call again at Wright's. sons, and therefore may be aided it getting lit; of tie s given for this book by the Earl of Chichester. The , —Did you go there with her, and at what time ? I verdict ? I can't say how far it may have that effect, Paradise Lost of Milton sold for £1.5, and that prore- t did, and it was about the middle of the day.—Whom (Lord ELLENEOROUGII)." I pr esume the witness : e: . gate production fetched Rl O ,O OO , while merit WAS i did y ou find t here ?D. Wright.—Did any thing pass means, he does not understand the legal effect the starving in a garret. ; between Mrs. Clarke and D. Wright, pointing you proceedings on the verdict." I Before the Learned Counsel sat down, he would : out as the persob that was to pay for the furniture ? The ATTORNEY GENERAL-1 don't ask what IN say a word upon the situation of the es. prosecute es. This Never, in my hearing.—What passed after your en. thinks ab o ut the leg a l e ffect of t he p roceedin g s, bet was not a question of money '; th at trance ? After a short time, Mrs. Clarke was called whether he thin k s the y wou ld aid him in obriiajni; r i could sacrifice, his' t his honour was dear to him.— I out of the room by a female, and I was left with D. relief against the verdict ? I don't know, but I shoui4, The defendant, Francis Wright, had gained 42000, I Wright.—During Mrs. Clarke's absence, were you in be glad if it did. (4 lane.) —Don't you expect, it and promOtiOn probably, but the Learned C ounsel (tire warehouses where there was much furniture ? I You obtain a conviction, that it will have that effect?, wished him still higher promotion, that to the pillory, was —What passed between you and D. Wright ? I certainly do not know it would. • I not entertain: The Jury had to determine to=day, between corrup. I Soon after Mrs. Clarke was called out, D. Wright any opinion that it will.—Don't you hope so ? I cto: tion and public virtue—ewhether the latter were to be was also sent for. He returned in about ten minutes tangy do now hope it, becanse ypue putting the quee upheld, or Whether he who 'stied his country from or a qiiarter of an hour, and we then talked of the tion to me so often, gives me hope that I may enter the former, were to be hurried into an abyss of ruin! different articles that were there.—Do you remember tain it.--. Then till you were asked it by me, you never Montesquieu said, thit a‘Ronle. Sparta, and Athens noticing any of the articles that were there ? Yes, I hoped it ? I ceminly did not.--You were in the a;.:ny lost their freedom by corruption,' so in time would recollect admiring a sideboard, as extremely hand. I believe ? I was.-You have quitted the army? 7 7 England. But the prettiest seriter on the Constitution, some in the workmanship, and asked the price of it. have.—Why ? I quitted it w hen the regiment was of England, Delohne, replied to this, that RomeAparta . Was that sideboard selected by you fur Mrs. Clarke's reduced.— You never saw Mrs. Clarke till Novem:)et and Athens, Wereignorant 4 the trial by Jury; and house, or any dining-tables or chain, or any' other last ? Never.—You seated to her what you wer(i that while this palladium were inviolate, • England articles in the room ? Never.-.—Did yon ever say any eeeking? Yes, I waited information on the subject would be preserved. Tl* Learned CoUnsel was then thing to D. Wright to induce a belief in' bim that Of the DO* of York's inquiry.—The Dake of lielll ' i entering into a view of the French Revolution, and t of I you would be abswirable I' Never ; the was no name was never ntentione4 ? NO.—The first nee the rise of Bonaparte, when ; ... 1 . . . , . eonversitiontsetween me and D. W r i g h t day On / . : e iu ttt vrore withlwr, did you not tell hei the Duke ct . •• Lori (` Et.t.s.soosotron interrupted t !tins, to ask if ~ tilt fubjeet.;—Did you ever make any promise 6 'fur. was aegefainto4 with the proceedings ar :rest what he was say lag had ahy*biiringutebn his subject ? ; nish s the house A's a pact Ora requital for slot infbrma. the Duke of lark ? I never did.—Was not lelejai Mr.Aeteter replied, that he thought it had, but ar awl she was to give you ? Never.--Do youpeollect Dodd in a situation under the Duke of 'Kent ? I I ,e , . e Zits. Clarke t vas as lot int Lei nce hen ght rhi- ti... a tion 1)e- -1 0- long ld it , 11 had Li so leirer ✓itt9l • 0: I 11:r. al :h, were ii g a i n , 2 ow. h. )oint. Rich- A n her ed 1,, ti made Pa! Du to rQvr t? What • • crept- )y- the .er ses ace cr .o pay C pay- -Do ai)out ocket. other- h wat -elope. to this ot4er Major •o:nr.ts ed they rrnahly d entfy 6 1 0 1 6.Y 1 rider or auk be der the tespects ire'than r of the .ding as ✓ men• e Duke trke, a- : enume: L. er used party, -e had a WOO, or 'Taking )uhaVe) - )u came hat that L....4s it not paid heel ? Yes, on been ? I be. say the