Star. — London, England, 1807-06-18 00:00:00

1.411 , INTELLIGENCE. COTTRT OF CHANCERY, JUNE T 7. THR 44.01114 F M, OF YORK, ,AIGAIHST THR MAYOR AItD CORPORATIM OF THS CITY OF YORK. In this cafe, the A: chhiihop file ci his bill for an injurietion againß the Defendants, to rearain them from demolithing or pulling down the gates of tile City of York, by which the Plaintiff apprehended'he would Wain injury or lofs of pa operty. The Plaintiff claimed a prefcriptive right to the toll of a great an nual fair, called Lammas Fair, in which a great number of cattle was fold, in the City of York. It was the ufage for the Mayor, trout time immemorial, on each fair day, to deliver up to the Archbithop the keys and gatis of the City, for the day. in order the more advantageoufly to collesl the toll, and prevent the cattle from paffing, without payment of fuch toll ; he alledged, by his bill, that he would fuffer lobs and inconvenience, by the want of the gates, and would find difficulty incolleeting the toll, whichwould str , t be fo produElive to him, if the gates were taken down, as the Defendants intended, and had aCtually commenced fuch pulling down, at one of the gates, previous to the bill being filed lan year, when the Plaintiff obtained an injunClion. This injunflion was, on this day, after being in forte feven months, moved to be diffolveti. the parties confenting to try the right by a feigned iffue. This iffue was found difficult to be framed, as the terms of it, when made tome time back, were, that the Defendants had broken down the polls of one of the gates, by which the Plaintiff had fuflained lots or injury ; but, on confideration, it was found that fuch an iffue could not be proved in an) manner, being in fa& a falfehood,.for that no fair bad been held there fince the trefpafs was com menced, nor could any fair be held before the next •aflizev. It was much urged upon the Court, to dif- Calve the injunction, upon the terms offered by the Defendants ; but the Coatiesx.r.ort Rated, that he could not comply with the motion, nor diffolve the injunction, on the grounds Rated ; he, however, ce p did a with that the parties might agree upon ome terms of an iffue, by which the right might be tried, and cleared, at Come future time, to fee what iffue could be framed for this purpofe. At the riling of the Court, it was fuggetted to his Lordfkip, that the Mayor and Corporation were wil ling to agree to the terms of any iffue; but the Conn ie' for the Plaiotiff laid nothing on this occafion.— Thus the matter feems now to tell as nnfettled as ever. GREY V. TRW DUX , VT NORTHUMBPRLAND. The plaintiff in this cafe filed his bill for an in junflion to reftrain the defendant from fearching for or digging coals upon the plaintiff's eflate at Back. ward, in the Manor of Tynemouth, in the county of Northumberland. The Duke claimed a prefcrip. live tight to enter upon, fearch for, and dig coals Upon the defendant's eaate, as well as on feveral , other denominations, towns, and lands, in the Manor of Tynemonth, of which his Grace ii the Lor'd, al ledging, that no copyholder had ever before denied or refilled fuch an nfage, on being paid for the trefpafs crammitted or done to the foil only. " Mr. Grey did hot VL lib to f ee his copyhold ellate converted into a colliery," laid Sir SAMuSL ROMILLY, "and although his Grace's anfwer, which came in only two days ago, was taken upon his honour, it did not appear perfitively Rated in it, that he had fuch a clear pre fcriptive right as was contended ; for, if filch right had in fad exified in the plane in queßion, his Grace would nor, as admitted by the anfwer, give any compenfation to any tenant, for the damage done to the foil ; for the right to the mines or minerals, if prefcriptive or nndoubted, would of necellity carry along with it the liberty of damaging the foil, in working the mines, er in fearching for loch minerals." —ln addition t 6 this lA, it was Rated, that no filch general right exited in the Manor of Tynemouth ; and even if fuch a right had trifled, it had not ex tended to the town of Backward, the lotto in quo of this trefpafs ; and if it was a well bunded claim, it would have been earlier retorted to and aliened. The Learned Counfel contended, that the iffue before tried in this caufe, at Newcallle, in 1805, was ren dered improper, by the perfons concerned for the defendant, and that all delay was imputable to them ; as alfo the impoffibility of putting in any proper replication to the defendant's iffue at law, which was tried and found for the defendant, being an immaterial iffue, and a cafe not triable by any iffue. It was mentioned that the land in quellion was in the potTaGon of Sir Matthew White Ridley, who was foreman of the Jury who tried the Are. *. The Court of King's Beach, upon a motion for a new trial, refuted to fet afide the verdia ; and it appear ed, that Rabies, and other apparatus for the colliery, bad been crated on the plaintiff's land ; and his Counfel fuccefsfully argued, that this motion for dif folving the injunaion upon his Grace's anfwer, mutt be refufed ; as, atall events, the injunction mutt Rand, on account of the Rabies and other ereaions. The LO) CriancaLina faid, he well knew both parties, and was very forty that they could not agree upon this matter. The injunction Rands in force againfl his Grace, and the works mutt be difcon tinued. For his Grace it was Rated, that his realbn for not former exercifing this sigh', was his not fooner hav ing wanted to extend the collieries to that quarter. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE :7. DMITHOLOINEW V. CLIFTON. Mr. fferjeant VAUGHAN applied to the Court to make an order eMpowering the Warden of the Fleet to remove the defendant (who was in a Rate of high mental derangement) from his 'anion to St. Luke's orforne other fit rteeptaele for perfons in his onhappy Rite, with had arifen from the ernbar raffed Hate of. his affairs. In confequence of his pe cuniary difficulties ' the defendant Leaf arrefled in NoveMber, tffo6, and from tt.e exceffive anguifh of his feelingibis the occafiin,became deranged. In t hat Rite he wit fetst to the Fleet, which fo aggravated his Malady arsid' tinder Inns completely furious and on. vefttsfitEThe Warden was therefore undkr the ne cfSfr df chaining Mn to the floor of the Broa* idiom i mttd in confcquence of this neceffary but fevere coercion, the life of the unfortunate than was in dao- Scrjettit added* that Acre was Oat Peiffiss'id believe the objea of the Piaintin' 4knothey, in continuing the Defendant in prifew, wink* iortnre theioinpaffinnnf the Defendant's bail or of his Wends, into a 'Richlands of the debt. *h therefore entreated the Coot to telieve the Warden of the Fleet prifon, from performing the diragteeable office of the keeper of a mad houfe ; and as the De fendant was now before the Court, in virtue of a Habeas Corpus, he hoped their Lordiblps would order him to St. Luke's Hnfpital, where he would be in equally fare cuaody,and be treated with the tendernefs and medical aid neceffary to his unhappy fituation. Sir jam s s MANSFIELD laid, the Court had no difcretion to order the removal of the Defendant : that, certainly, it was neceffary for Parliament to veil Come loch power in the Warden of the Fleet, under fuch circumßances, as in this point the law was certainly defeflive. llis Lordihip, however, obferved, that the defendant did not feem, from his prefent appearance, to be either in that high Elate of derangement, or danger to his life, which had been reprefented. Mr. Serjcant VAUGHAN replied, that, although the unhappy man appeared tranquil for the prefent, he was under the aria care of keepers, to prevent him from any at of violence in Court. The learn. ed Serjeaot, however. was conflrained to withdraw his application, and fnffer the matter to rell entirely upon the mercy of the Plaintiff. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. On the sth day of May laft a Pule to thew Caufe was obtained againft Francis Redfearn, of Laugten Lodge, in the County of York, Big. on the a ffi davits of Joh n Thompfon, Thomas Bolton, and William Sowerby, attorney, riming to the belt of their belief, that a certain letter figned F. R. laid to have been received by the laid John Thompfon, doting the !aft affizes at York, where he was attending as a witnefs for the fait' Francis Redfearn, was of the hand- writing of the laid Francis Redfearn. And, on the 3d day of June inllant, caufe was (hewn by Mr. PARKE, of Counfel for the laid Francis Redfearn, in oppoll ion to the laid Rule, on feveral affidavits filed for that purple, when the Court was pleafed to difcharge the fail Rule with Colts. 'um' 16. The Arrnew FY GE / eat. appliedto the Court for a Rule to thew caufe why an Attorney of the Court, named Neale, (hould not anfwer the matters ccn• tained in certain affidavits fworn to againfl him. It was neceffary for him to apprife their Lordfhips, that this was an application againfl the Attorney for mat praaices of a very ferious defcription. The fir ft affi davit defcribed this praaitioner as having written a letter to the Jailor of the prifon at klodmin, in Corn wall, in regard to the difcharge, from that prifon, of a debtor named Mutton, whole enlargement he had obtained for 31. t6s. requelling the jailor to recom mend hint to the other prifnners for the purpofe cf procuring them emancipation : he offered the jailor one half of the profits that might accrue from loch praaices. The Attorney after this wrote a letter to the infolvents in general, in Bodmin gaol, Rating that on account of Mr. Mutton's difcharge he had 'received 31. t6s. but that the enlargement of that perfon had cog him 51. 6i. betides out of his own pocket. He did not expea, therefore, that in future he fhottlel be applied to in that way by any debtor whole incumbrances did not amount to tool. for whom he Mould find bail in Town, and even then he &mid be paid only in n middling way. His terms wire to find bail for any lam from col. to 501. ten pounds; from g:1. to tool. fifteen pounds, and In on progretfively in proportion.—The Attorney General proceeded to Rate, that the means by which this Attorney obtained the enlargement of there infol. vents was by Ann bail; that was, in two infix:tees, bringing forward men to become bail for tool. who were not worth a groat each. To thefe twJ intlances the affidavits fpnke moll pointedly, both their bail having been rejeited. The jailnr at Bodmin had, however, refufed the propofal. From there bah the Attorney General trotted their Lord (hips would agree with him—that an Attorney pratlifing in London, who floored to Melt mean praaices and attempts at Bodmin, was unworthy of continuing longer on the Roll of Attornies. Lord ELLERegannan afked the Attorney General whether he could Rate any other circumllance re. garding JGam Aai/, than the mere fait of loch bail having been rejefted The ATTORNiIt GENIMAL replied in the affirm*. live, and proceeded to read from an affidavit a copy of a letter, where the Attorney raid, I can bail the P. (meaning evidently the prifoner) let the debt amount—(here the words wete torn off by the feel) for three Millings in the pound." Lord Eut,astanaouon—' 4 His eondua in offering in contrael andr price is extremely fbabby, and may tiltithatelY lead to mar pradiees. The only thing like crime imputed to hist is the offer to bail the pan. ners for p. in the pound, and it is proper he (hould adorer that charge.'.'—Rule granted. cAartitat V. HOGAN. VI this cute Mr. Gaatow moved, that the Rule be made 'Volute. • Mr. Also?? (hewed Cattle ngainß the Rule on behalf of the Defendant, whom he Rated to be an Attorneys clerk, -haviag chambers at Nn. 6, Clif ford'. Inn, in the city of London. He had been rued beft're the Court of Requells of the City of London, for the fum of four pounds ten Millings for beer fur niffted to a friend, and for which he hadcontraeled tO pay, at the Mitre Tavern, in Mitre-court, Fleet. Ateet. His refidence was Rated to be well known to lite Plaintiff, who had there frequently called on him. Mr. Abbott, however, contended that although the Defendant polkaed chambers in Clifford's Inn, that thefe were not the place of his refidence or abode, as hi lived with his Wife and family on Millbank, Weft mitißer, in a honfe belonging to a perfon named Wilkis,called the bastard bwje, and where he had lien (cried with the Floods of the Court of Reqneßs. The Defendant fought his livelihood, in the City of Londim, itt the cffice of an Attorney, and it was therefore contended that he did not fall within the meaning of the Aet, which applied to Om* only who kept a Sop, flied, or (tall ; or were reeking a livelihood - in the City of London. The livelihood the Defendant fought in the City/ elms bbl than intended by the Aef. Mr. GAR row faid, that this was one of the plaineß cafes piiffible. -The Defendant had fworn to his pol. felling Chambers in Clifford's Inn, and the fait of his dryer having quitted them for five years, except for a day. or two, to breathe the hefts air in the country, Was alto admitted by him. It was not true. that he lived At Milibsok, but only went oc‘ationally to the tawititbasife on a Saturday evening, with his wife alit} Lanity, and that he had been found on a Mond'' , morning,. when he was ferved with the procefs of ihei Court Of Requells. The Court decided in favour of Mr. Abbott's eient,l ohferving, that the parties ought to have brought themfelves within the meaning of the Ad in terms, I and not by inferenc.: merely. THE RING V. SARAH SEALE. 1 This war econvitlion under the Little Go AA, which directs, that where the penalty of tool. for each offence is not immediately paid by the offender, the Magiftrate (hall have power to commit the de. linquent for a period not exceeding fix months. The Att alfo defcribed the dilltibution of the penalty, one third to the King, another to the informer, and the - lan to thole aiding and of lling in the apprehen fion of the offender. The conviElion by the Migif. trate, however, which ought fpecifically to have enu merated thedifiribution of the penalty as above Rated, merely defcribed it as having beeen difiributed as the law direfls. Lord EtLvwsonouc H, in delivering the judgment of the Court, faid, that the cafe had been Ma ably argued, but one material fa& had been left wholly undetermit ed, namely, whether or not there had been any perfons aiding and aftifling in the appre. henfion of the defendant, to whom one-third of the penalty ought to have been paid. There was nothing in the evidence to fupport any idea of the kind, and it appeared, therefore, to the Court, that the con viaion WAS defeEtive, and could not be ma'n aired. A TTAC HM Kt 4 T. Mr. LITTLEDALI applied for a rule to Phew caufe why an attachment &mild not be filed againli Robert Mounfey, Efq. and Rowlandßowley, for refilling the execution of a writ of . fieri facia: iffued out of this Court. It was fisted in the affilsvits, that Mr. Mounfey wis Under Sheriff t, r Cumberland, and had granted his warrant to a creditor, to Gize the goods of his debtor, and for that prpofe a (pedal bailiff, named Pattick. fon, was employed. After the officer had entered , into poffeffinn, Mr. Mounfey came into the !ionic, and demanded by what authority Pattitkfon aced; when the latter (hewed ft:r. Mounfey his own war rant, granted as Under Skeriff. Mr. Mounfey in- Randy fnatched it from the rifficer's hand, and ran off with it, but Pat rickfon retained poffeffion of the hoofs. Soon afterwarJs, Bowfey and others cape there, and, under authority of the Under Sheriff, broke the pannels of the fireet door, entered the premifes, affaitlied the officer, and turned him out of poffeffian, he, however, (Lill keeping the keys.—Rule to Thew caul( granted. ARTICLES OF THE PEACE. Jofeph Wiffin, a Wiltthire farmer, prefented arti des oldie peace againft Thomas Sutton. They flat ed, that the complainant was in conflant fear for his life, in coefequence of the ►epeated threats of Sutton, and that nn the 18th of January lafl, the latter laid he would flab him with a carving knife. On the Bth of February following, as Wiffin was returning home late at night on hot feback, Sutton flung a large Anne at the cqmplainant, which bit his hole, and lamed the animal. On the t3tb of the fame month, he repeated the like violence, and from that time to the prefcnt,he put the complainant in continual dread. Lnrd ELLEI4BOROUOH^" The hft inflance of any perfonal danger is as long ago as February, and there. fore the complainant cannot have had much to fear, or he would have prefented himfelf former. He may either go before a Magiltrate, or proceed by indiet- Merit. ROBIIRTS V. CAPAPIELL. This was an aiti , n for Bander, brought by the Plaintiff, an attorney cf . the. Great SPlEuns of Cl.e (hire, who had obtained a verdift in his favour. Mr. Butterwort,. on a- former day, had obtained a rule to thew cattle why judgment thould not be atrelled, on the ground, that the words Rated in-the declara don were not actionable. The words Rated in the counts wore, (peaking of the plaintiff, " he is wider the charge of a profecution for perjury ;" and it was added, that a pubrc officer would pi ofecute him for it. The ATTORWIY GititißAL. and Mr. SCARLET, oppoled this rule. The gnettion was, whether ex• preffions of this nature, would or would not have the effect of injuring, difgracing, ar.d perhaps of ruining the plaintiff? On flanderoos expreffions, there were a great variety of cafes in the books, in the de cifions refpeCting which learned Judges had materi ally differed ; and where authorities thus went hods ways, their 1..-n-dfhips would. mbar, think it fafer to troll t ) their own views of truth, reafrn, and Cllt. mon fettle, than to confide in any curfi ry claffifica tion of thi fe cafes. On fuch grounds the Learned Colloid hoped that their Lorilfhips would difcharge this rule. Mr. 'roman and Mr. Boartoucus contended, 1 that words derogatory to the party againtt whom they were dilated, were - not always the fubje& of an attion ; and in fupport of this pofition, they cited the cafes of Holt v. Schofield, Haynes e. Sprott, Stewart v Bi(hop, and Powell v. Winde, which, with fome others, are to be found in Hobart, Cro. Eliz. and Williams' Sautriers, particularly in the latter, tfl vol. 203. note 4, whe-e all the cafes or iouendoes are colle&ed in Croft v. Boite. From there authorities they infifled, that to. difgrace the party was pot fufficient, the words mull alledge fome crime, which would fubjee the plaintiff to capital poniffistent ; and the meaning of fuch terms could not be extended by inuendoes. There muff be a di re& affertion . of guilt, which could not be pre tended in any rational conttruBion of the expreffions employed by the defendant in this cafe, fince they imputed no dire& came, but merely that the party was under the charge, and that the public officer I was employed to profecute the accufed. Lord ELLINTIOROUGH." We will look into the cafes, for we are unwilling to lay down a rule which may encourage improper applications, or diferrunte stance the' fit teference to the authority of the Court, in cafes of this nature. Although the atinnhere is of little conktinence, yet the ntle may lia al wasp • . invariance-4 ° - : ~., . , . 0 7301 /na CIRC DU* '..:i;614 1 ; C 1:::: ,tz :a i : "'Amax= i __ _ . &it ,& 1 1 i;:ns; ti. ton—Tuesday, s4th July,at tb01:44101111101101114., Saturday. ISth July, at New Sutra I • '.„ ..,s. .., f, ~, ; I IDedetL—W'edetefday. tad Idly, at Dorelltlta..Z - "I '' --- 6 .: aggdp.aajdond4 wart& July, at the Calle atamapt.2eLiM ty Oltr anil Causal of kjeter— Sasso day, at ahlt 41110 1 ."140P ef i - Cora* lll--1 " 43 T , salAnivn., at &Alvin. ; L - '-'? '-' 2 Bitilkifel•—Sititrany, &It Augalt, et Brklgewater: 73( • ; "Y . " • Owned Ceuutrut ihittol.—Wri•lay, Lath Aura', It della& i bail Id lb City IA BrtlitaL ~ ~ , .1 tat Sir A.ThOsupfon, Kat. and Sir S. Laurence, Km.. ~ .. • - , ... •:;;0 , - 1 Mir! DV: 3. June 30. latter Lindfar, formerly of Greetintick, K;:nt, bak er but late of Barking, Effet, farmer, at tcn, at Guildhall. June 30. Thomas Rookitty, of Chatham, Kent, linen-draper, at tens at Guildhall, London. June 39. Henty Hancock acid jntin Bernard Hoffmeycr.olblaw. cattle-upon-Tyne, merchants, at eleven, at Deltas Coffcc-hoof e , Newcafile j litr.e 30. Tbotrfas Midlen. of P giaWalk, Bermondfey, Stirre r , I - vidualler, at ten, at Guildhall. I June so Necdlcr Chamberlain, of Flect-firr.et, London, dru g . I gift, at ten, at Guildhall. I June 3n. Edward Marlton, now or late of Tittoreter, Stafford. (hire, at twelve. at the Three Queens inn. Burton upon 'trent. June 30. John Blunt and Roblrt Seollay, of the Coal Exchange, Lot clan, coal fadtnrs, at ten, at Guildhall. June A Matthafs Pearce, of Blackman-Bract, Southwark,cheefe mut g -r, at ten, at GuildbalL [ June %o Abraham Wood, late of Scotland yard, Whi:chall, Mid diet( z. vidluallitr, at tin, at Guildhall. June 30. George Dermot, of Gray's Inn lane, St. Pancras, Mid, dlcita, cow/keeper. at ten, at Guildhall. June so. George Blunt anl John Moult. of Little Carter-hne, IThetore Commons, London, whulefalc grocers, at ten, at Guildhall. Jun e 3 0. Jahn Somervllle of Chancery-la , c London, cabinet. maker, at one, at GnikilLift. June 30. (fate Mrneelin and David Airsick, of Cheartide, Lanz don, perfumers, s t twelve, at OuildhalL "MEI). On Monday faR, the tsth init. at her refidenee in Charles (tree( ' Manchcfter Equate, alter a long Muth, the Right Houourabli Lady Kirkcudbright, relidt of the late Lord, whom the furvivcd only five ys-rs. Lately, at Louth, in Lineolnihire, N. Wigglefwortb, Efq. He has bequtathed socr I. for the relief of poor debtors. Lail week, the Re v.Thornas ATM.' Dales, Redor of All Sainte, Levrcs,and of St. John &trill, In the Chi At a quarter to twelve tielork, on I tally night, at her hours in King Itreet, St. Jantes's, Catherine Colima* of Dellngto, „ a daughter of the bath and lilt Dukc of Bolton. Her Lotythip Lan left fix children. Her &left daughter, Lady I.ouifa Catherine Barbara Vane, is jolt fiztetn. Lately,at Trinidad, C01..n I 1-Tetflor Maekenzi= lon of Kenneth Mackenzie, late of Red Caine, in the cou..ty 01 No's, Lfq TO-MORROW. Sun rife I . Svn fete Mon lets .14 minutes after 3 t 6 mit after 8I 51 minutes dirt t kiloH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO MORROW. Mon,lng - - at Alma a•ta s ARrsanois • - 5o minuses atter . r. ^ , .. 1 TO THOMAS TAYLOR, P.fq. Dear Sir, No. o, Bridge-ftreet, Loodor. IFEEL it a duty incumbent upon me, to inform you of the very great and extraordinary Cure I have received from your invaluable Meeteitie-I.E.IKP.'s PA'rENl' PILLS, About two years ago I was atHeked with a Venereal Mollie which I treated rather nightly lot fume time, hut the dtfeafe at length fpreadiug all over my Body, I was obliged to apply to the molt eminentot the Faculty. but their afait•ace afforded only ton parer) , relief. I went through various courfea of Salivation, out from being rather of a corpulent Halis4 was reduced to a mere Skeleton. the ulcers that fpreint all user my limbs, rendered ma a complete object, fa that my filmes derpaired of my recovery'. Whet: brought to this fituation, I cion:ldered death as Inevitable, but a relation of mine commenting upon the many odes in which your Pilis bad foceeeded, I was induced to try a box o: them. which I thought rather relieved me, and by perieve ranee fur two .n three months, and foll,,iving yi,ur din &ions, I experienced' the mod unaccountable relax .tion from pain. the lure gradually fubfidlng ; I am now, thank Gen, rsei feed" revivered, and walk jog out daily : I doubt not but one more box, which I think easy tiros to tape, will eilablith my health in its original Elate. It is with the rev ft heartfelt gratitude that I fabferibe myfelf, Sit, your much obliged hurnLle fory oat, Wu. Pitarau.- Deatifeate, Machetter, July 5. Igor. P.S. For the public benefit I do not c.bjeCt to the elute being puhlilbed, but leave you to ad as our own better jiidgment mall didate. Prepared a nd fold by the foie Proprietor, Thomas Taylor, Mee bey of the Roy .1 College of Surgems, Lando i, at his Houle. No. ci, New Bridge (treat. Where, after a oatitant refidence of more than thirty lig years, In a practice particulaly dir.rsted teve the Cure of Venereal Complaints, with that inviloahlefecreey, which men of his profeffiun ihoufel always obierve be flutes* laimfelf, the advice and aiffitanee he gratuitoufiy. adminiltega to perfons taking this Medicine will he cfteemed by a difcatilnePub lie, as an advantage feldom to be obtained,and void of ambiguity. —Alf, Id, by his Appointment, f..r the convenience of thofo living at a &lance, at the Perfumer's. Na. 35, St: Alban'oftreet, Pall Mall; the Foy Ship,' No. 103, Oxford-ftseet •Mr Odin- . rough's. No. 7, Fitt-iireet H.ll ; Mr. Steel's, liofeller, No. 1, Union Row, Little Tower Hill ; Mr. Warfon's, South-Brhigt„ Edinburgh •, Mr. Colwell's, Dublin ; Mr Blliitige's, Liverpool; Mr. Atkin:Eon's, Manclufter ; andby one Perf..n in every eon fiderahle l'uwn in Great Britain. and Ireland, in Boxes of oil;' as. od. each, teal .11 up with full and plain dired'ons, whereby . _Perfons of either Sex may Cure tbenafelveawith Eafc, Speed, Se erecypiant fafety. . WHEIsi Profefflonal Men of Education and Re, fponfibility deviate from the general Sythem by the feledintr of a particular branch, the fandion of long continued fucceffes is the heft criterion of fuyetiority. Thirteen year. bate I devoted my pradice to the eseluftve treat. meet of Three Viforders, and the fuccefsful refult of my plan given me additional ardour to oppofe, afar as I am able, the ravages of thofe Complaints which arc the mot/ Important in the Catalogue of Human, Infirmities. After initiation into every Branch, as an Army Surgeon. f formed a withat an early period of pradke to refeus individual from the igunraine of uneducated men, or the equally dangerous I precipitancy of general Practitioners: 3 he Three Diforders, to the cure of which I have devoted my attention, comp: de every fpecies of VENEREAL INFECTION, whether of a recent or long duration; idly, all kinds of debility. whether arifing from the habits of fchool boys, or the indulgences of mature age ; and,laily, that derangement of the fyftem in wo men which is called BARRENN ESS, or STERILITY. Numerous Direafes are the refult of ignorance, or !mite in the treatment of a Gavle Gonorrheea • and it not unfrequently hap pens that the feeds of Life are paConed by the indiferetioa of an unguarded !tour By a fuperior method fueh Complaints arc rattly cured; and, even where others have failed, I mutt that I may pre fume to Mier a radical re-eftablthntent • I Few, however, are the cafes of complicated &firers in this dlr. order, compared with the calamitous fitoations of men, who. from an indulgence in a folitary vice, or the prevalent ga•cties of a [Alienable life, acquire that Rate of debility, which is the una voidable confequence of fuck pernicious habit.. Where the unhappy (offrer broods over his mirery, but care fully conceals his misfortune, it may be lime confulation for hint to know, that although it he an objedt of doubt or uncertainty with other praditioners, the removal of there deficiencies by the gradual progrcfs of renevatbin, is the acquirement of my experi ence. If the rites of Bamboo or Venus have begun to reduce manly vigour, much anxiety will be prevented by an early counteradtiots of this languid (late: and in there cafes no great difficulty will Occur. But where this deficiency has for years %gifted, a proper petfe verance is indifpeurably requifite to revive the (lumbering (parts Of life, and to re-animate the copftitudon. MARRIED WOMEN, who have long been difiippointed fa their =pedaloes of 'a family, may be. ,Barad,, that in meta in (tamp, fuch deft. dts are curable by Medical till. The (covey which is fo effential to my undertaking, and the tjealificatlobs which I have prefwated to dare ) form the bats of my pretender's. and in coincidence with Inch this intimation is given. that •Mr. Brae may be confulred pergoaally, or by totem (inclefing a. fmall Note), at his honfe, No. 29, ArundeNtreel. Strand, near Temple-Gar. There is us additional Entrant in Water ftrget adjoining. sad the name is oo both the doors. MARTfbi BREE, Member of the Revd College of Surgeons' in London. 1 A CAtrituw.a—flome Perform, *be falfely Wert the:lsidro to be M tiansat Tits Rov.kt. COLLIGA. having fOIIC/WilllSCetb 6 pat caplet any Advertifemento aliwoft word for word. and Wald Aetna as their own prodpeftions, it is my duty to mention, that Agefe Perfons are wog Members of any College in London. Eels' or elfeorhere ; Ilare they nay right to ?make Sur/ lif Lendbe %N. B.' A Lift of the Mtn ther& iapubliftied at the Hauge of dit allikinillitiLkicliWO-balnFickir.whiela may be referred to. . . LANDOW: Piloted Ilikl•pibEibed by LEVEL KENT, (of (Ni. istbuqp•Plice, .1 kinheth), st, the STAR ORVICR WO. I ellir itrcet. NeillibectiP it be Srmi Chins, Tea* is& J