Star. — London, England, 1809-02-11 00:00:00

, • • . SIV°S2II. The SPEAKERieIt i - Mr. WARDLE answered, that he had obtained Contrnittee the manner u_ on this oc L l. in from Mrs. Clarke in the manner he had before proceedings ...,ted to the Horse that he had taken them from the practice of Parliarr Mrs. Clarke ; but 'she had previously said he must which the Cammittee et , I not have them, nor must use them, or words to that neral Clavering. It wc , effect. a- li am entary to do ' that ; - Mr. Dl:mos:Aar was th e n called to the Bar, and the gember, which, rouse letters .beiog alsew w nto him, he as asked if ttey upon the minutes ; but in his plaet, - that he , lo were in his band: writing ; and lie auswerid in the affirmatitie. • wished to be nstamined i r , .competent to the Con The letters were thenlread by the Clerk, serial*/ ; they were addtessed toldra. Clarke,- and signed by miaation. I . Mr. Dontnam. They art to the following effect t An entry was then n , The fi rst was dated from Charles* t, St. Janus's_ Member having stated Mum, October Bth.. It acquainted Mrs. Cltukethat Oen. Clavering wiSheC the Deanery of flovefired was vacua, - and must •be I ing was called in to be filled up by the following Saturday. He wished her I It appeared, howevi to pfecure therefermett for the Rev.-Mr. Glasse, I then in attendance, up I for which he avtild pnapose to give IEIOOO, and he 11l to be retexarained. himself wishedto obtain the situation• for Mr. Glasse, Q. (By Mr.Wa EMI at which his Royal E :is a .pintieular friend, to whom he wished to pay a compliment. He represented Mr. Glasse as la good Mrs. Clarke left town . I scholar 2 'wealthy man, and a kind f riend, and ur g - w ithdraw, observed, ed the Lady's immediate it interference in his behalf. 'NIr.VOR la havir The letter added, That a Landing Waiter's place Mined before, with would be vacant in alew days, and for which he was gUlar mode of procei authorised to offer £lOOO, if she could pro cure it. mer evidence read to wished to give any el The next letter was dated from the same place, Oat. 20, 180. ' It•stated that the Deanery of Salis- The CHANCEL bury was -vaestatt, and that he (Mr. Donovan) was did not think it the I commissioned by 'some Ladies, the friends of the Rev. ness over again; witl Mr. Barely torte of whom was Lady Cardigan), and in this instance direct who were -exceedingly anxious to obtain for him on his former examii witness would incur Church prefect-meat, to make an offer for the deanery. I.lhe.y had sultaeribed 3000 gu ineas, which were in one day the co co ready to be given to Mrs. Clarke, pro- ,if she would another. He agree, -Friend, that the rn cure 'the appointment. h stated, that Mr. Barely , 1 .was well-known to his Grace the Duke of Portland, would be to have hi - to Lady Cardigan, smd several other Ladies. It sta- ness, to give him an ted him to be a fiche man, and an •eacellent preacher , Mr. V9ll-11TBRE the constant practic , who would be recommended toy several persons of 1 fashion, and by the Jaiihona of Norwich and Salislm- witness might, will ' • w et on a stibsequen fir, and added, that the Ladies were very anxious that 1 - he should not know haw the appointment was proem.- met one. Inc agret etl e as they wished - to sttrpriae him agreeably with the proceeding would I referment. to the witness, arid The next letter related to the preferment of Henry • Mr. S. BOURt Tobin, and inquired whether Mrs. Clarke could pro- - been aninstance, is r cure the Paymastership of a second battalion for £5OO. into a Court Jun / 'The neat letter -has dated Dec. las 1505; it ex- terial pint of fs fot •f , .pressed Mr. •Donostsues regret at not having had the Mr. W. WYNN ' pleasure Pof seeing Mrs. Clarke -en Saturday evening. • 1 come to the Bar to He wishea to tnow it she codhl procure the appoint-, posed was false, I most of Barritok•Mnster at Sacannah-laNar, whether forgotten on his fn the salary was hot 41500. alear, and Whether this of an habitual heat. 1 . wasasterling or Jamaica currency ?It repeated his Mr. BARHAN •fotater request about the Landing waiter, and the, losing time and gr faymastership of a second battalion, for which he. aoy opinion upon *as ready to pay the ulnae , / ; and added, that he was should hear it. so ill as tot to be able to go out, but if he was able Mr. B. BATH' to .bear the motion t f a•cettch he would dine in her appear whether thy ' neighbourhoodnext slay, and call on her in the evening. rication or falseho, The next letter was dated .can. 20, 1560 ; and sta. they should hear 1 1 i ted that Mr. Donovan was daily teazed about the - tip. Mr. Pc EnCE wa! foili anent at Savennah-laNat, the . Pas -mastership, CHAIRMAN-11 and the Landing waiter's place. deuce ; and if in I - Mr: CAVENDISH BRADSHAW moved, that shall perceive any 1 ' . the short-hand writer's notes of Mr. Donovan's evi. he is at liberty to fence yesterday he now read. The etdence p The short-hand writer said that his notes were in night respecting t. the hands of - the transcriber, and would be ready in to have Den gi to ] an hoar, when the A IRN MT. j6.R -A D SHAW said, his reason for wishing the evil. ice \\lie to have she notes ofr 1%;,. Danovsn's evidence read which lie wished i i over win, his opinion . th,a , Ile vvitness had grossly A. No alteratil prevaricated in his-evidence ; and if the Committee York went to . 11 should concut w ith hiM in that opinion , it was his sent can to get a intention to move that Mr. Donovan he committed. htantgla it in to t The CHANCELLOR.' of the EXCHEQUER said it was all 1.4 t . said, he hoped that the slime treatment trotild be you B evidence ? y I.lr. Yench i .. TC s wteu r as Mr. Donovan ; but he thought 1 when .?.:rs. Clark ' ‘1 cb S t - O-lie Nvitrtess who should he found to i rvai r i f iven to i .any l that, in the present stage's f the business, no motion change. far the c ommitment of i,a) w 'mess should be pressed By Mr. S. Dot by the H on . Member. 1 any conversation Mr. BRADSHAW C;t1(1, 1w should attend pa - I here lately ? A. tiently to evidence given at the bar ; but' he should to any body abot eerzainly move fort he commitment 'at :my prevarica- Q. I - Live you . n w.t. , css tin . .. • r your evidence he I The ATTORNEY Gr.fa.RAl. said, he had re- Q. Did you eeived a letter from General Clavering, whose name ; from the Bar on had been mentioned last night by Mrs. Clarke, ex- as I withdi•ew. pressing a wish that 'he might be examined, in con,„Arierce ;" and : 7 tra diction to Mrs. C.lxrkc , nt larke's stateme. ~, dilm."—Q ~ Did Mr. W. SMITH thought it right to follow the • Q. Are you pi t ei.lciole proposed by an Honourable Gentleman, to you' on the e towards every prevaricating evidence, ,as well as on night, nor you t • t Mr. Donovan ; towards Mrs. Clarke, for instance, if the Park, and h (she shotild be found to prevaricate : but he hoped the the evidence I E . • pr i nc ipl:• would' e continea to those whose prevariea- Q. Was that l 1 non •shoilla . appear from , con tradiction in their own do vie ? A. TI- Yi I ' - test i m ony, and not to cases where their credibility .and nie , exc e p t should be onif shaken:bv the prependerating testi- down of 410, 1 't mot •of more respectable evidence ; such for in- to changed, ) get 0 ! , -stance, as General Clavering. take with respoi The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER By a Manus was against proceeding to commitments in the pre- o n aMrrdle abo a rdut 1 sent stage of the :inquiry. . Wli n•-• ADAM rose for the purpose of inculcating I had received t'le same trinciple tli:it had been laid down by the for her. . I toll 1 a aaa. like of Gentleman, namely, that of going the amount of • iarnigh the whole of the evidense,before they skottld "I think it was proce:d to c.anment ttpon any. part of it. As this you adhere to inquiri -.vai continued tram day to day 3 and the same spoken with n( Members were rot always present, it would be much not spoken to more desirable to suspend all judgment upon any you get the b ,art of the evidence, mud the whole should be gone I Byfield's and ) . through, when the hlr ue would be able to come to i street. 1 thin a fl . tr, just, rational, ana dispassionate decision, 'ac- for me.—Q. - cording to the true pi inciples of justice, and most con- where else ? •t with the interesn , of all parties. street, and tri lx. WA R.DI,E acquiesced. left Mrs. Ch Vim A TTORNEY GENERAL then called the , Ilave you se attention of the Committee to the letter which he had ; serv i ce , A. Teeetved front General Clavering, and read - in his : this House.— phee;eiressive of his wish to he examined touching . before, or the , . 4 a transaaion fresh i ii the recollection of - the House. A. The day ' . •if it were the wish of the-Committee, be proposed to and met he: i , . call General Clavering, in order that he might be a sked to sked rne wh Lt. 1 • examined. . ''' • • On the proposition •being made, that the letter of that 1 did G en eral Claverin to pi wed upon the Matutes, . changed. _ • ~ . ; NT. ausios ON base.rved, th at he. did not see B' Lord i . in o n what grounds the letter could beiriserted in.the foi- i ili t, at ii • lihnatCs• . istination, y AIMINIMEIMIIIMINIIIIM Ife hit duty to s . tiggt . Whiolt7in* now relate ?A. I had Oven ilead-ache, l er in 'w hich it could dtredt Mi •to filial lam subject, and Aichnirects 'by tneinory. rocessioft most confelismilitywi'. same tine I cAd think of it, .but :as I wss lament,leerythe grotirids ,not asked about it, and was ill, I wished rebore...to 4:child protect to examine Cie- . withdraw, than to reltiaintontentionit.--e. Axe you . • would irregular and unpar now suffering under the same . affection ?A. not now. 'that :Op= tertrat Setter 10 any Tfol-theCimmcattea-oTthe EsteissierEoin. it. Then lsequently, could not be placed it was Merely froth a defect of memory arising from I.lt if any Member should declare yourhea-Lache that you didnot state this circurnstance Itni.* that General Clivering to eleTorineemstance was from What . 1 felt teat the fai, it would then be at being .brciught to the Bar of this noose, .where I !onsmittee to proceed to the eza- 'had never been before, that I omitted to state Q. Did you recollect this circumstance:at the time you weie here before on a former night? A. I had a recollection of it, though not of the :..tan of the bill, but I have since recollected that it was .XlOO. By Mr. EDEN. Q. Did you knoW before you came here, to what you were to be examined .? A. No.— Q. Do you recollect at vilwit Lour the Duke of York set out for Weymouth ? A. At one o'clock in the n made in the minutes, that on a ted that it was known to him that ied to be eianined, Gen. Claver• , be examined. , wever, that Gen. Clavering was. not upon which Mr. Pierce was called nt )Do yott recollect the period . Highness the Duke of York and :own in June, 1005 ? A. I do. wing moved that the witness should 1, that as the witness had been cx :h respect to ate hank-note, the re tceeding would be to have his for to him, and then to ask him if he explanation Of it. .ELLOR of the EXCHEQUER le proper mode to examine the wit with a view to his giving evidence -ectly contrary to what he had given ninxtion. In a corrt of justice a tit- the guilt of perjury, by SweAr-i :ontrary of what he had sworn on' •ced, therefore, with his Right Hon.; most correct mode of proceeding:, his former evidence read to the wit) t an opportuairy to explain it. READ contended, that according to 7tice of Committees of that House, al 'ithout being guilty of perjury, car ient day his evidence given on a for greed, however, that the be s t m o de of! td be to read over the formerievidence , id allow him to altererr amend it. R'NE insisted that .there never had ! , in which a witness had been called 7mq - ice with a view to comet any rna formes. evidenct. INE denied that the witness sera's to to s . tate, that.what he had before de-, but in oraer to supply what lie had i former examination, in consequence: :ad-ache. ,AM observed that the 'Committee was ground, and that i t was bettetto defer in the witness's testimony until they' 'nu It ST stated, that it could not yet the witness would be guilty of preva !hood, nor could that be known until q- what he had to say. ;as :The witness will attend to the evi.: in the course of the reading of it, he illy thing which he may wish to correct to make the correction. :e given by the witness on the former, g the Bank note, which he there stated :o Lodowick to get changed, was read, t)IMAN asked, if' r there was any part hich the witness had just heard read, in !cl to make any alteration or addition ? atioil. On the night when the Dnke of . 4 , - eymouth. about 11 o'clock, I w a s a Bank Bill changed. I went ol , t and .o Clarke ; *rooked over it, and rigllt. . .h.L. ();. Do you add any thing else to ? A. rile Doke of York was present ,rte wave me the note, and received the 0 ot - rtN E. Q. With whom have you had ~n respecting the evidence you gave .. With nobody•—Q. Have you spoken bout it ? A. With nobody. - mou seen Mrs. Clarke since ru gave here lately ? A. No, I have not. iu see Mrs. Clarke when you retired on a former night ? A. I just saw het 1 w. • She bowed her head, and said,l d I said, " I haVe been examined, Ma id she say any thing else ? A. No. I p. . ositive that no other person has spoken; evidence which re gave on a former' ato any holy ? A. I met Lbdovic in he sail to me, I must be mistaken in I gave. ,at all that passed between you and Lo t That was all that passed IfezwPen him: 'pt that he said there was a Bill'btonghe: 1, by the girl, by order of Mts. Clarke, d, and he thought 1 rw4gl - .1 makea mit. , ;poet to that Bill. ... luEn. Q. Did you write a letter to Mr. - it the evidence yoii gave.? A. I called Ale, and told "him about the hilt - Which ed from .Mrs. 'Clarke and set changed : old him I had done 4.—Q. What wai of the bill Which you got changed? A. \ is 4:100, but lam not certain..-Q. Do to your former eeidence, That you have I.no person upon this 'subject ? A. I have to • any person about it...A2. *here did bill changed ? A. I . got it ehauged it Ind Bridgeman's, confeClionert, in Vere-J, hink Bridgeir , an and his Wife Changed. it !. Did you try to get The bill eltstaged any ; l ?—A. I went to the milliner's, in Bond ' . tried there.—Q. How.leng is it . si. co yak Clarke's service ? -- A. Three years.—Q. t seen Mrs. Clarke since you quitted her A. I .never saw her sineo, all I taw ter • .—Q. Did yOu not see. her a an' or two the day on which you Were eianitnediiere? I' before .she 'sent to Me, and I went totter , • her in her carriage in Biker street ; .0; 1 whether Ptementhered the bill Which was' Loclowicla to get Changed ; andl told her id remember •a bill %via& I took to ge t • •Li FOIASTONE. Q. Row JO-yon atcoutf irr giving itur col eon a farrier iSca you did not recollect the circnoutance .• • r. morning. Q. By Mr. layeLen.—Did you know, when you were last at that Bar, that you were to tell truth ? A. 'have told the truth to the best of my recollection. a nd the answers thereto to b e read. They were then By Mr. 13a elle:M.—l .ddsite t he two - first questions lead accordingly. Q. How could you have stated that you spoke to nobody on this subject to-night, when ou afterwards admit that you spoke to Mr. Wardle y and Lodowitik upon it ? A. I did not mean what 1 said then. - • • i By Colonel VEREKER.—Q. How can you reconcile that /our memory is perfect as to every other part of the transaction, and yet very imperfect as to the amount of the note which you had to get changed ? A. I am not certain as to the amount of the note, any more • than to the best of my recollection it was 4100. Q. By a Member—Do you know bliss Taylor ?A. I have stem Miss Taylor et Mrs. Clarke's. 1 Q. Was she there frequently ? A. She was there 'frequently.. 'Q. Was Miss Taylor there when the Duke of York was there, and in his company ? A. I believe not. I have never seen her in his company. She might' have been in the house whilst he was there. 'Q. Was she usually pare e .of the company when his Royal Eialiness the Duke of York was in Gloucester Place ? . A. I never saw her in company with the Dake cif York. Q. Was she very intimate with Mrs. Clarke ? A. She was, I believe, very intimate with Mrs. Clarke. The witness having been ordered to withdraw, on the motion of Mr. SHERIDAN, that . Right Hon. Member observed, tlnit. the Committee ought t. be very tender'in admitting insinuations against the vera city of a witness under examination at their bar. He instanced the question put by an Honourable Mem 'bet opposite (Mr. Fuller) ~ whether the witness did ndt know he was to tell truth i" as an attempt to cast a reflection upon the credibility of the person under -examination, which the Committee would not fail to discounten.ence ; arid when proceeding to corn . ment upon the course that had been pursued, was called to order by The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, who thought it unusual to order A •v..itnevi to withdraw' that the Committee might receive a lecture upon the course of examination. If such a proceeding were to be acquiesced in, no progress could be made with the enqniry. • He would recommend to Gentlemen to abstain from all comment upon any part of the evidence until the whole . • should be gone through. —He had not interrupted the Right - Honourable Gentleman out of disrespect,- but in order that, by . putttng a stop to . .premature discussion of detached parts of the evidence, they might have some prospect Of coming to an end of the enquiry, I%;r. SHERIDAN had not been commenting on the evidence, but oir the 'nude of examination ; and insisted that, if a course which he considered impro per should he resorted to, Tie had a right to observe upon it. As to the note, they could easily satisfy themselves upon that Lead, by referring to Messrs. Lightwood and Bridgman, who were said to.havc given change for it. Mr. FULLER attempted • to procure a .hearing in vain, amidst the cries of 6 , Go on ! go on !;) A short conversation then took place, upon a sug gestion made by Sir CHARLES BURRELL, that every Member should continue standing whilst lie was examining any witness at the bar. But a motion pursuant to the suggestion was withdrawn, it being understood that the Chairman Was to ascer tain and intimate when any Member was dune exa mining, before any other Member should enter on the examination of a witness; The witness was again called in and examined. Q. By Mr. Gione—.Are your head-aches such as iu require medical aid ? A. No. Q. By-Mr Lusitteoroe—Q. What do you under stand to be the real profession of Miss Taylor ? A. She is quite a stranger .to me. Q. By Lord FOLKENTONE—Do you recollect Miss' Taller dining in company with Mrs. Clarke at Glou cester Place ? A. Yes, I do, Q. Did the Duke of York ever dine there at the same time ? A. No. The witness was then ordered to withdraw. GENERAL CLA NIERiNC: called in. Q. By the ATTORNEY GENERAL—aid you send in a letter tome ? A. 1 did.—Q. Desiring, that pelt -might be examined as a'witness at the bar? A. Yes. Q. When did you first -know Mrs. Clarke ? .A. About six years•ago; I don't recollect the preeisctime: Q. For what purpose did eim call at Mrs. Clarke's house recently? A. In consequence of a report I had heard-in town, that every person with whom Mrs. Clarke had ever had any conversation, would be breeught to the bar of this House to establish her ve racity. On hearing this report, I sent a letter to an Honourable j,4ember of this House (Colonel Wardle) of which I have a -copy, which, if it be the pleasure of he House, I shall .read. The letter was in snlestance to this effect : • 4 ' In eatesesittence of :its toying been intimated to General Cla vering that Mrs..Ciarite had given to Colonel Wardle a list of penotli Who were tote called= to in= testimony toter ctedi tility, he begged that his name might be etrsitged twin the tat, es be was a faintly man; •sted al.° if he wet* celled on;. his 'evi detree would go tb ftiplEatit her veracity, si she hail yin; rately told him first she wasitrider - the .protection of and lived ivida Mr. 11;;fallaa:" - •. . . Flav:sig :read 4sat Defter; General tLxrEirrolir a eeeded to atutir;'tliatEiat. had wailed o# Colonel-Witt -4115, tetittAmed . toltWo th !l itlepo xi -the . letter,. aid, his us:along would. mpeach' kr. 'further Infaiireiratiitni Itisti ii": - hi tt *ire' clinaL . o* Clark‘ii credit ; because it was tot. a month since she had told iota she lived with Mr. Mellish: After leaving Ccloncl Wardle's house, ,he had • to pass by that of Mr-. 'Clarke's in his way home, and thought it might he cf service to call there also. But when he went there she was denied to hini on the ground of her being ill; - beetle- was m e t},- that -if he returned in twn hours, he might' see her. Inc said it would not b e i n his power to till at doe t ime, and was informed, that Ills. Clarke would dine at home at five o'clock. B e had caned at a quarter past five, b ut she would not see . him,.and• the purpose of his visit wan to inform her, that if she should call upon him, he would be under ale necessity of stating what he then had thelonour to state. Q. . Is there any thing else arising out of the evi dence of Mrs. Clarke of yesterday, which you have teen, and may wish to. explain ? . On this question, the witness was ordered to wits draw ; and on the motion of Mr. ADAM, that part :f Mrs. Clarke's evidence, of yesterday, which relaie , is the visit of General (layering at •her house, eels is.h. when it appeared, that Mrs. Clarke had there sta.,;, that she would not see Geoeral Clavering ; Ih o Anal candidly admitted, that on that point thhe was rim the contradiction he stmposed, betweon tiia evidence of the witness and the evidence of Mv::. Clarke. General CLAVNIUNG agel,, examined by the ATTORNEY GENERAL. Q. Is. there any thing else, which you welsh' wis:i to state to . the House ? A. If I may rely on the i,. ports in the Morning Papers— CHAIRSIAS.—" 'I am to inform the witness, that it is contrary to the usage of this House to allow ; eh references of she description alluded to by him." A. If lam to believe what I have heard, it has been said that I had spoken to au Hon. Menthe; of this House, with a view to influence his vote upon a particular question in this House. I declare to ate House, that, to the best of my recollaction, I never spoke upon the subject to that Honourable Member, Besides, that was perfectly unnecessary, because tha; Honourable Member voted on that occasion on the sane side in which he always voted.—Q. Did you ever represent that you had influenced that mice vote on that occasion. A. Never. Q. (By Mr. StIERIDAN.) Did you exert your ir. fluence to bring Lord Jubn Campbell from Scotlacd, in order to vote for the Defence Bill ; about the er,: of the year IEOS, or the beginaiiig of the year 16C:=3! A. To the best of my belief and recollection, I sieve wrote 11C0r spoke to him on the subject. Q. Have you at any time, during your acquaz tame with Mrs. Clarke, promised to send her recur mendations for any officers ? A. Never. But her; is necessary for me to explain my answer. Abe: six Weeks ago I received a letter from Mrs. Clsri informing me of her wish to see me. Accerdiehlr waited op, her, When site told me that she tray e: tremely anxious to get promotion for a your.,- rn: of the 20th regiment. She stated also, that his Re: Highness amcMr. Greenwood were very desirous have this young man pronioted.. She told me of regulation which had lately been made, by whicl letter from a M e mber of Parliament or a Gene. Officer to Colonel Gordon, would be sufficient procure promotion for thy person recommended. did not know of this regulation, and stated to l that I must know something of the character of p::rson before I would recommend. Accordin two days after :Mrs. Clarke inclosed to me a le: from Lieut.-Colonel Russ, of the 420th, stating t the young man was a worthy character. In e to ascertain whether this letter was really from C: nel Ross, I went to Greenwood's, and was infor.r. there that the signature was his. Having hoe:. formed that Lieutenant Sumner was nephew of Sumner, Member for Surrey, 1 wished that he stn write a letter to me on the subject. I accordi: received a few days after, a letter dated Temple, signed something Sumner, which was so absurd, I sent it back to Mrs. Choke with a note, acqta ing her that if she meant it as a joke, it was a s bad one. A few days after, I had another lc which I have in my pocket, from a Mr. Sum stating himself to be the brother of the Lieuten: but of this I took- no notice, io consequence of absurdity of the former letter. [The letter was then given in and read. It. dated Jan. 17, 1809, and stated the conduct and ratter of Lieut. Sumner, in the 20th ; mentioi.e. with to obtain a company in the rith, arid rev the recommendafion of Gen. Clavering to the C mander in Chief.] hsat»inatioa continued.—Q. (By I. Shi Did Mrs. Clarke represent to you who the Mr. nor was from whom this letter came ? A• I 17 : formed at the first interview that he was the r.e: of Mr. Sumner, a Member of this House.—Q. nem o no wrote that letter ? Ci'lAttmaN—The object of this question is o - ) whether you• know the r er,o. .1s wrnt, ti:.' ho A. I worth knew him ; but this evening I been informed there is r.O such person is: cxt.Atisc c 2, (By Sir T. Tuicrox.) What ;nessage, a whom ,did you leave it, at Mrs. Ciake's whet called up-so her ? A. I . left no (Cr message that llt cqlliq upon her at .a.quarter past. EiVI time which she had appointed. Q. Did the Gentleinan. Who NV3S with you • any message in yotir hearing ? A. There w one with me.—O. Not either of the time , . you I upon tier? A. On: the second time, I said servant, that it . was very -extraordinary that Clarke should Wave gOnh out at t time `she` appointed Me to meet her.-Q.. Did You le: anessoge relative to the purpOse r for wliic l a you • o n her ?• A. I left 04.1 me.s.sage but what l statedi—u-Q. Did she tell you that she lived wi Mellish,. the Member for Middlesex ? A. Site say the Member fix .Mlddlesex.--Q- Have y and What reason to know, that she is :under tin tectihn'hf Mr. Mellish ?. A. 1 appeal to thi noise-Atli House, and the , siinutes of its prom Q.:1 4 4-61A tindergand you to say, that you h: . Other-ham* -h? isripeach the,credlilit.y of Mrs. than that.she told Itou she wissaLnder the ref of Mt. * Mellish ? 'A. Not *it I am aware • Haire you any te.vott but what you have ihrar . 4 .4 itnpeach her testimohy i or to cons: izaireatity of belief A. I certa7nly do not GI .. • , , y, -m ~ her w orm y , the : Wanner. iii which she : :3pol•me, aOtk,thejvahiety 4 crass Odcnce ‘k , aplieaislo have kiii s tri bao"iiiiiis 14cooariVe The' witness was ordered to withdraw •; al; P* l sag rril foe 011 01 tb nt tri I I c a It P. .d. n:. ••• nv,t v I ex- aa S t? 11 a :11 t etter that , a ti:: . . ioula ingly , that lain:, very iclv a:ant ; d air: t. v-4 . , „ an yQ I e ;e, sear it len r.• I Atli Yr. did r~ you he p''' r• his e ectingc have 14 ;. Clar 7 otect 4 read 4 ' d‘ter conceivi imp o4l e I{l 1,- .1 •