Star. — London, England, 1819-04-27 00:00:00

FRENCIIPAPERS. PARIS, APRIL ss. Yesterday the Chamber of Deputies again met, when the Order of the Day called for the discuslion of the second project of Law which relates to the , mode of pr:oecutton - and judgments for rnisdemea lion is — Or the . P T l:e;s. No- ;Mtinbeir .had inscribed his name to speak against tits Plea, but two iNfembers, M. LEGRA. VAREND and . nowt]) de LANGLADE, were suc cessively heard in its favour. The general discussion was then closed, and the Chamber ptoceeded imme diatelf to tte examination ofs.he Project in detail. Article Ist being merely.introductory to the Pro je.4 proposed without. observation, Article 2, proposed, that in case of offence towards either of the Chambers. through the medium of the Press, no prosecution shall take place till the Cham ber offended shall have presented an Address to the KING, begging him to 'disect the Attorney-General to prosecute. The Commission proposed as an Amendment to this Article, that the Chamber offended should itself have the power of at once ordering the prosecution.; without any Address to the King. M. de hi 13OURDONNAYE opposed both the original Article and the Amendment as equally contrary to the dignity and independence of the two Chambers. The Chambers, he observed, are two powers of so ciety; every power of society is necessarily indepen dent ; and to submit to the revision of the Royal Power or of the Courts and Tribunals which has in stituted the decisions of the two Chambers, would be to treat as subordinate and justiciable two powers which are recognized as independent. From the mo ment that the interest of society requires that they! slsOuld be these independent powers, it arms them . with the right to make themselves respected. The Chambers ought, therefore, in the opinion of the Speaker, to have in themselves the power of punish ing all offences against them:committed through the medium of the Press. He accordingly proposed that Article 2d should be referred back to the Commis sion, with instructions to amend it to the effect of establishing this power in the Chambers. M. BEUGNOT contested the positions laid down by the preceding Speaker. The Royal power was as much one of the independent powers of society, as, the two Chambers are and yet the Sovereign is ob liged to descend from his throne, and sue before the Tribunals for the redress of all injuries to his dignity. The Chambers ought no more than the Sovereign to have the power of judging in their own cause—a power, in theory absurd, and in practice pregnant' with the greatest danger. M. De CitoSAIGNOLES, Reporter on the Project, followed on the same side. The motion of M. de la Bourdonraye for the remit: was then put to the vote. and rejected by a large majority, only five or six Members on the right cising in its favour. The Article as amended by the Commission was afterwards put to the vote, and passed. The four succeeding Articles were also passed, after some slight amendmer.ts. Article 7, which relates to the provisionary seizure. of works under pro , .ecution, was expected to have given rise to soma discussiOn, but it passed, without. any observtiOn as did also Article 8, on the same subject. Article 9, was the subject of a pretty warm discus sion. It proposed to enact that the warrant of sei- . zure should not be recalled, except by, an unanimous judgment of the Council Chamber. MaxuEL, and other Members. thought such a provision extremely severe—placing it its the power, as it did, of a single Magistrate, to prolong, by his vote, a seizure, which might ultimately turn out to have been most unjust. M. BOURDEAU and M. DE LAZE contended that the enactment was in perfect accordance with other parts of the Criminal Law, and that the unanimity required was a matter of very salutary precaution. The Article was ultimately adopted by a large majority. The discussion on the additional Articles was then adjourned. The Chamber of Peers had also a public meeting on Thursday. Baron Bastard D'Estang, one of the new Peers, took the oaths and his seat. Count de Scsov, in the name of the Commission appointed to consider the project of law on tobacco, made a Report, recommending its adoption. The Re •port was ordered to be printed, and the discussion on it .tppointed to take place on Saturday: A second Report was made by Count Conran:ors, on die propovition for a law to substitute some other punishment for transportation. Ordered also to be p-anted and distributed. The Chamber adjourned. The Chamber nest proceeded to Article '2l of the project which exempts from.prosecution the publica tion of whatever is matter of judicial record.—(Some slight . tuudiiicatitm.) • A Note has be,. officially communicated to the Ministers of trance, Spain, and Austri•► announcing that the Divan cannot consent to the immunitie* ; which these Powers have solicited in favour.of the Catholics of Asia Minor; that it belongs to the Dachas to regulate their treatment; and that any interference • on the part .of the Porto would ; be an Infringement of the privileges conceded to these local Authorities. • French per Cents. Thursday, 6d ft-. 80 c. . BADEN, Atsitti. s. . _ Since some circumstances have been discovered which induce a belief that Kotzebue's murderer did nut act quite as any insulated criminal, but that he really was a member 0 a secret society, a Special Committee has been appointed to examine this affair, which proceeds with )lill, possible care. Sundt has been conveyed to the 'House of Correction, his health uedinese and it seems hu• will probably die of con s tmpttan: he has notict given any information. few days ago• his brother,. came to Manheim. An unfounded report says, that.an attempt was made at Dresden to assassinate .4h fitourdza, but that the Student, when he saw that he could not execute his Lorrid purpose, killed hifuself. PARLIAMENTARY :PROCEEDING .. • HOUSE OF LORDS, APTLIL .26. Counsel were fully heard relative to the Scots gauge, sek P. Whchell-and limper," after which their Lerclehips affirmed : the judgment of the Cutlet belOw, with .C5O costs. Counsel were . then heard in part on the case ; of " Get's, r. Wallace."—To proceed again on Vresinesday. The Marquis of queestearanr, the Earls of .VILECTOM and CHAMLZMONT, and Lords Um. and Dtt.usvett took theoaths and their pests, as did the Bishop of Ditusionr, one of the Irish Representative Prelates. The Earl of COVENTRY presented a Petition frost the Borough of Tewkesbury against any further extension of privi lege to the Roman Catholics. Lord ROLLE presented a Petition from the City of Deter, agaiust the Roman Catholic Claim.. The Excise Licences and the East India Custom Dutiesßilis were brought up from the Commons by Mr. Baocoes: and others, and read the first time ; as were a few private orlocal Rills, presented by Sir ItoseavV.secutax, Mr. H. "SUMNES and other Members. The Duke of NORTHEIMBERI. AND presented Peteons front the Towns of North and South Shields, against the tette/al of.the present Insolvent Debtors' Bill; and, secondly, his. Crate presented Petitions from the same places, praying that whaiver regulations may be adopted with respect to the subject of Debtor, and Creditor, provision should he male for the due protetion of the honest trader, against the fraueleisait and unprinciled Debtor. Certain Accounts were presented by Mr. Msnox, fromihe East India Hotise, respecting the Company's sales of Cotton nei other articles, within a given period; which, on the nt9tl of the Earl of LAVDE.RDAI.F., were ordered to be printed. . Earl FITZW I LLIA M presented a Petition from the Chi of York, complaining of the present weight of taxation, and prang fur relief. The Noble Earlpresented a Petition frcen Wakefield aga:ra; the continuance of the Insolvent Debtors' Act. Mr. Simplot presented atthe Bar an Account of the Tonnage Duties paid at Dover Harbohr for the last year. • The Earl of LIVERPOOL briefly referred to the Mineral Alkali Duties' Bill, which Mood before. their "Lustisbip for a third reading. For a due understanding of the measure it would he necessary to enter into some considerations of tetal, and as that may not tie convenient to some of their Lordships, he won't ' therefore propose that the third reading of the Bill should stand over till this day tennight; which was ordered accordingly. ' Viscount GRANVILLE moved the second. reading of the Canal Felonies' Bill, which 'accordingly took place. The Earl of MORTON presented a Petition from a numerous and respectable Meeting of the County of Fife against the impo sition of any farther Duties upon Coal. The Earl of ESSEX presented a Petition front Leominster praying for a revision of the CriMinal Code. , The Marquis of LA NSDC.W NE presented a Petition from I number of Unitarian Christhuss in Liverpool and its vicinity, respecting certainparts of the Church of England marriage ern, mony, as inconsistent with their tenets and doctrines. The Peti tioners stated that the Jew, and Quakers were relieved by law from the necessity of atiarrying, according to those rites; and they expressed their hopes that at some future oppertmity a re laxation of a similaetendencr would. be extended to them. The Noble Alarquis then presented a Petition front the Ro man Catholics of the City of Limerick', praying for a Legisla. tire allowance of their Claims.' And also a Petition to a similar effect from the united Parishes of Balrudday and Ballyskeane, in the ° Counties of Dublin and Wicklow.—The above Petitions were respectively ordered to lie on the table. . TRIAL BY JURY IN SCOTLAND . . . , The' LORD CHANCELLOR rose, pursuant to his notice, to move the second reading of the Bill he had brought in upon this subject. Their Lordships, he observed, were aware that a few years back (in 1808) an Act was passed to extend the Trial byJury' in Scotland to civil cases. A measure of the kind was generally desired in that century; and the Act then passed may be regarded in a great measure as' temporary or piperimental. It was since deemed likely to prove. expedient or beneficial if those regu lations Were made more extensive, and further powers given to the :Coott.'. In this .view it was proposed by the Bill, as one of the provisions, to empower the Lord Ordinary to send certain issues, to be tried by a Jury in the firstinstance, without being obliged to send them -previously lb the Inner House.. There' were other:provisions:in the Bill calculated upon a' similar view of improvement, and especially as re garding the:powers- of the Lord Ordinary. What he would novilirOpose was, that their Lordships should give a secondreading to the Bin. On an examina tion as to the terms proper to be used, be found that some alterations in thelanguage of the clauses would be necessary and' he shMild therefore propose that their Lordships would consider the Bill in a Com mittee on Wednesday, when the necessary alterations could be Made; and the Bill, if it were deemed pro.. per, could be recommitted on some future day. This arrangement seeming to meet the concurrence of their Lordships, was tacitly assented to, and the Noble and very Learned Lord having so moved, the Bill was forthwith read a second time, and committed for 'Wednesday next.—Adjourned till to-morn ow. AIUNICII, I APRIL a. I,lle Chamber of,Depaiies has voted on the motion of M. Bchn—it has decided unanimously that the laws respecting duelling should be revised, and that a law to prevent this abuse should be presented to the Assembly. It rejected by a majority the pro of establishing Courts of Honour. . . HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. WNAIWIITON moved that Si, John Stuart be dis charged from the custody of the Serjeant at Arms, without pay ing his fees.—Agreed to. . The SPEAKER then reminded the Ifnillll, that on Friday last an order had been made to take Mr. Singleton into custody, for being absent . on a Ballot. In the'exccution of his duty, the Serjeant at Arms had received a letter Troth Dr. Tierney, stating that he had seen Mr. Singleton, thought dim, from the state ut his health, incapable of attending his duty in rarliamenft, and conceived that he had slot been able to do so fur some tithe back. Mr. Singleton's own excuse'was, that he thought his leave of absence had not yet expired. It now remained for the House to decide what course it would think proper to pursue. Mr. C. I L II VEY then moved that the order for taking Mr. Sirgleton into'custody be discharged, which was agreed to. Mr. WYNNI then muted chit the names of the Members ortlered.xo attend the ballot Kt-morrow be called over litmus. diately after the ballot, without suffering any other business to interpose, and that no Member be allowed to enter the House after the ballot until the said names had been called.—:Agreed. Mr. J. S3IITII prexented a Petition froth the parish of St. Mace, Wood -street, against the London Clergy Bill—Referred to the Committee on that Bill. Mr. WILSON pivsonted a similar petition from the united parishes of St. Mary-lc-Low, St. Pancras, and All-hallows.—Re; tarred to the Committee. Air. 131 NG p. rented a petition from the parish of St. James against the Parish Clerk's Bill.=-Laid on the table. Sir IL WILSON presented a Petition from the parish of St. John's against the London Clergy BilL—Beferred to the Com mittee. Mr. Alderman WAITIIMAN presented similar Petitions front the parishes of St. Mary, Aidermanbury, St. Thomas Apostle, and St. Bride's—Referred to the Committee. . • Mr. Alderman WA ITIIMA IC then pruiented a Petition from the parish of St. Bartholomew the Great against the Parish Clerk's Bill.—Laid on the table. . Mr. BAR NETI presenteda Petition from the parish cf St. Nicholas, against the Loudon Clergy 13111.—Referred to Ow Committee. Mr. MARRYATT presented a Petition from tfte pari..h of St. Mary-ase against the Lune .1111 L—This Petition was ado (erred to the C,:mmittee. Mr. BE.II.3ION'f presented a Petition from South Shields against Mock Aurtions.—Laiti on the table. The Chimney, Sweepers' Regulation Bill was read a third time and passed. Mr. S. BOURNE postponed the further consideration of the Report of the l'oor Settlement Bill to tins day se'nnight. General GASCOYNE expressed his intention of their tr.oving for a re-committal, In order tr, extend the time of Settienwnt.. General GISCOYNE gave notice that to-morrow he should move for a return of all exports front Great Britain to (;aisada, New Brunswick aud Neva Scotia, for the last year. ••=/01. 111 • • • -••• 4 Mr. TTONEYWOOD presented a Petition from.Wisolsvisis 4raying foCan alteration on the Coal Duty. -Laid nn the table. Sir J. G R A 11LXM preseutcd 2, Petition from iLe Parish of Luke's, Chelsea, against:, the Poor Settlement on the't able. Sir J. MiAHAM moved that an Acconnt of the actual value of property aiiscsced in the different parishes of tht, City of Loa don since I $l4, be !lid before the lionse.--Aigresd to. The lr.sh Coru: , er's Bill was read a sxm4.4 titn;and ordered •to be committed on' Monday next. • - The Committees of Supply and Ways and Means were post poned till Wedmemlay._ CLITIICROE ti INIVORCE RILL. • • • • On the motion of Mr. LEIGH, the House went into a Committee on Clitheroe's Divorce Bilh . After the examination of witnesses, and the speech of COup-. sel on behalf of Colonel Clitheroe had 'concluded,. Mr. Alderman WOOD said, that he had been in 7 strocted to prApose a clause, the object of which was. to prevent Mrs. Ciitheroe from selling the reversion of an Estate left her br her father, which, if the Bill were to pass as it then stood, she might do if she pleased, to the injury of her only child. It WAS wished that she should be placed in the same situa tion with respect to this Estate as she would be if the Bill did not pass. Mr. BIRCH objected to the clause as new and unprecedented. Mr. Serjeant OYSLOW conceived the object of the j Honourable Alderman would be as well answered,; if, instead of the propcsed clause, there should be in serted one to prevent Mrs. Clitheroe from selling the. Reversion without the consent of Lox .hushand. Dr. PHILLIMORE contended, that it was mon strous and quiLe at unprecedented thing to insert in any Divorce Bill a clause which went to deprive a wife of a right which was not contingent upon her marriage. Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW repeated his formar opi nion, an expressed a hope that his .Honourable Friend (Alderman Wood) would consent to withdraw his motion. . . Mr. WROTTESULY thought that the subject ought to be referred to a Committee. The House had at present no knoWledge on die subject. Sir J. MACKINTOSH said, that it was impos.; sible for the Mouse to receive the proposed Resolu tion, without giving the Lady notice, so that she might he heard by Counsel against it. He was far from pretending to say that the justice of the case might not warrant such a clause; but the first step was to serve the party. with notice, even before the. House could entertain the question—( lear, hear)._ Mr.'Aldernian WOOD withdrew his motion. The House resumed, and the Report was ordered to be received on this day se'unight. • . PRINTING OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS. Sir W. 1)E CRESPIGNY, in moving:,that the Papers relative to the collection of Taxes in Seven Oaks, Kent, be printed, said, that voluminous as those Papers were, they could be printed for 14'70, and the publication of them would save the Nation thousands of pounds. Mr.,LUSIIINGTONsaid, that his only objection had arisen from a desire to save expenses, but, now I after a selection had ,been made he had no objection. Mr. 1-1..511M NER said, that if the Papers could be printed for the amount Mentioned by the Honourable Baronet, no objection could be • made to his motion. • 'The SPEAK lilt intimated, that in cons3quence of what had been said on this subject, he had endeavour ed to ascertain the . expenses of printing all those Pa pers, and the time in which it could be done. The expenses of printing would be £450, and the printed Papers would-be delivered to Members in three weeks. Mr. H. SUMNER moved an Amendment, that it be referred to a Committee to consider how far it was expedient that all or part of those Papers should be printed, Sir W. DE. CRESPIGNY agreed to withdraw his motion, and to support the Amendment. Sir E...KNATCIIBULL said, that the Commis sioners wished for nothing but that all the contents 'of the Papers should be known; he would therefore support the Honourable Gentleman's Amendment, Mr. WROTTESLESI moved, that the words should bb “ all or any of the Papers," &c. Mr. TIERNEY said, that the object of a reference at in this case was to have the fiat of a Cotrimittee for printing the Papers in the first instance, and there, fore the words could not be " whether any" ought to be printed ; for that would be tantamwunt to an inquiry whether Papers could be printed without the other side of the House. The Honourable Gentle— man (Mr. Tierney) suggested, that the words should be, " That the Papers be referred to a Select Com mittee to consider what part of it might be necessary to print for the information of the House." Mr. WeovrestEy • withdrew his proposed altern tion; Mr. TIERNEY'S suggestion was adulate:3, and the Committee was named. USURY LAWS. Mr. Scrjeant ONSLOW postponed *the farther con sideration of the Report of the Usury Laws Repeal Bill to this day tOrtnight. Mr. CALCRAFT complained that this postpone ment would be very inconvenient to many Members of the House, who intended to oppose the Bill. He hoped that the Learned Serjeant would at least fix a time to which he would keep. • Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW did not conceive that the present postponement could inconvenience any of the Members who attended regularly to their duty ii: the House. His object in-delaying the further conside ration of his measure, was to wait till the Bank Com mittee should have made its Report. Mr. cALcitArr was sorry to have excited the warmth of his Learned Friend, whose raillery, how ever, had no elect upon him, as he (Mr. Calcraft) had the merit, if he possessed no other; of attending the House regularly. He hoped that the Learned Setjeant would be cooler, when he should come-to the discussion of his measure, and would suffer him oelf to be convinced of its impropriety. Mr.WAITHMAN said, that however the question might be regarded at any other period, this was not' the season fur its discussion—(Hear,l,ear).-1-1e hoped that the discussion of it wou.d be put off at leastthi s Session—(Mnr, hear). When the mercantile world, the money-market, and all the springs of trade wort in such- a state of derangement, the 2Lkitution of the public mind by a question like the present was eb- Viously ill-timed and unwise, whatever zhight Ise the real Meths of the ssibirt—( /Al", he:i?). DAV.FIWOR . .7.after adverting to the setwa: ;ion . which the inbject had excited throrilh the coin), try, expresser! bib hope that the.Lirarncd Mcplbet Would to- the do , he had fired. '\, ItE ter m , t o i v o e n d e t f l e t O h: t e t - p, o 3 f rt tl ; ETA T. MADE ACT. for tfr tile P Tur i tl i ;e i r M co °, Marriage Aa Airendinent Bill. The question having been pet— Sir C. It011iNS:)N rose, and opposed the progress of the measure; which he thought na: called for by the present state of things. tended, that the House was not yet in a state formation to enable it to proceed upon a mal much importance. It was true that saner hard serras had been employed in the attack by the Learned Doctor on a former niece, of them were warranted by the fact. The L e ; Doctor had contented himself with brrtd atsr and had formed his law atcordine :a hiL but it was by no means calculated to prod, fieneficiel effect. He then entc.ed into an e:. that of the origin of the Marriage Laws, and necessity of alfording a prcr_lcioa to fir. you ; inexperienced penens who mithe b rt.:We thr of designing individuals. the eid rot d‘ety were some defects in the c:.istine law, which; be Et, at a proper time and :striper 14,,, remedy; but not in the eencrel and swerpi ner proposed by the measure nnw under cc: lion. Ile was convnited that the !till tuegae li.th!e to many of the principal objections l a ben ma d e t o the as it :toed ; and in if establish this point, lie read to the House the clauses, cornmenting as he proceeded u manner in which they were worded. Ile part', ei:eCted his observations against these pmvisii related to the period within which it should 1 mitted to those who had married during the ir rity •to set aside the union : he resked also sections that referred to the residence of the in the parish where the bans were priblishrd, certain tine before. such publicaion. Ott th( he saw no important. benefit that could testi the measure; while it weaild-1 , .• attended tcitl practical ineonleniences." Under diem circum and with-these o4jectiotis, he thought that ought not to be altered, He should 'the:Trim as an Amendment to his Honourable Friendt sition—That the' ICeiiit lee taken into cousi, this day :Li Mr. ..Serjeant •ONR.OW conceived the Act,. in spited - sense objections which might duced against it, tciltplistentially right. 'net some clauses in it which inight be struck or advantage, and others, perhaps, which it mi l far the banefiteePthe Public to - have introduced. 4 CACn The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, after payn high compliments to theAdvocate-General maliner in' which tib had conducted his opposr the Bill tio\v'before the House , stated, that of opinicut that the present Act stood in need amendment. It appeared to him that the Ho; bound to legislate, not on particular, but on ; usages: cases which appeared to prcs3 hard u: dividualsmight still be productive ofzreat 'convenience to the public. The Marriage . not been made for the protection of the only, but also for the protection of those n sensible of the various artifices which wen practised against the unwary female hefort enacted. He had not heard zny argument ad which convinced him of the propriety of iskerii existintr law ; he should certainly vote Olt altaration which had been that evening pie; their nOtice. Sir JAMES :NIACKINTOSH conceived was as important a sitb:,i•ct as any that had como before them, inasmuch as it was on , nliich the happiness of society in a great depended. Ile therefore thought hiniselfies saying a few words to the House upon the ob which had b?cn urged against the measure Honourable and Learned Friend (Dr. fhillimt The first objeaion adduced against it was, would be a departure horn the law itself. charge he must plead because he did how any amendment to a law could entire! with the law itself. He wished to draw the of the House to the manner in which the Act had been originally passed. It was not of deliberation, but an act Of.tbe utmost rash' Mr. Pulteney, itr attendiirg some Scotch appeal , struck by the harshness of the then existing lat . drew up a Bill, which was referred five times to the Judges. After it had Leen so tell Lora Hardwicke remoulded it, and, driven ' sonal altercation into ra zeal .for the law w proposed, employed his talents and hi; info procuring its enactment. That law was bla because it made the children of an imprude riage the first sufferers by it, and also becair ilicted a stigma upon the female who had col it, who, in his opinion, was the very pars()) ought to be defended, against the caprice an/ stancy of a profligate husband, lie then con the present ilarriage Act as absurd and ty: in the highest degree ; and after some other tions, conciuded by expressing intention 0 t'or the Bill sfllich bis Hon. friend (Dr. Phi. had that evening introduced to their notice. Dr. i'IIiLLIMORE spoke at some length The Marriage Act, in its existing state, was. a scandal and a disgrace to the natioa ; for i n to it, any „one come and claim the of his own pr: jury. 'lt was, he thought, imi on the House to take the alr,:se; in the 12' exists, into. its scriotts - consideratio , i, and he prised that his Honourable Frie.td, who in!i , the operation of the law, shoulti oppose any al in it: Ills HcnotiraSle Wiiend bad 01:tett House to .do justice- to the memory oi Len . wicke, by opposing any alteration in the ho -stood sanctiened by his authority ; but he (Di more)• Would beg ieWe to reter to the evid' ; . Dr. Birch respectiuk wliat was ihe H.trdwicke concerning the iklarriage Act. hf opinions•of the 'person alluded to, it appear( Lord liardwkke tleciared his concare.nce amen4ment• exliwtaiicsit that the J-teett Bill might be amended by a subsequent .Ict Bement. 41 so, the opinion. of Lord Ha' ought not any longer to he argued against t posed amendinent. In order to prove the en! oppressive oper.vtion of the Law v e i pect,ng as it now ekisti, the 11;)nottrable Alenibe.• LIU :iiety of the princital Ot wil ; • 411 'bat** the, husband ohmined a h ceilse. own applita tihn. Lao . ' :the E4sc ladies, riturnetl in wettllt, :tad ate; irtrthl(ne 13.. . , „ his w•' tu arrie e futt!; no: at ,• lie be I ate f i . . or • 0 math , t for a i it al4 1., tc ick m cirilisi huts , td 11:211 timed, :It t ' ii , h•-• • --la-bo , ough el centidc, 01E CJ tc Tae Hot roar. aPr-: ord e .. serval 4 .eler. l l , ion of 1 upon , The Dill irticuiat grosed' isiuns tl id be p . An the r heir m: the day also ' • .at cf tin to wit, fin the ~h:' Lord C/ • I. ^ .r,iderati ith at t. ,', a3u l 4 i{oo tt the • :5n of S frire until to $ pror• Lout) asitierati, •Th e ord e I'd pres. a s gee 4 gjit fhet e w on: t-i• e bC luced. I}'"g ... IBC -al tor t -nor :l7T: :°1 Itri It se N eool y ir h it(:l posttion • • ding at he w need of OW :thou tha Elos,ue ~mended on gene: of h 'd upo,l'o 'er, but it ultinta Act e F. and p . Le wh ignora. The L( o w were dz..: .e Bill " bre it lember a Jraer cieutly ontmittc portuni 4 g airi " The Bi aopose., , t . he sec( that •': de r ed id retenid one or. The LI • ohj ectr.,7 Mr. J. are ut 'me :no Ihrstur.2 ince the as, that(xi and, 1. To t. 5 ...• ed the p did note 'a;s bey e attend,:, e ( ast , ytar object not ua o .et checi Bur which d i tidt t tin e h:l l ll en b, .ccounta ause ,t ter and ircc. hick trial b tit • ''' true 0. ondent • with m a Mr. I' c. f cation ft 'hiiiint.• • &IL 11 state, .h in rf.r-J* Petition is. he r i en ✓ aect•••••: - g i v i n t h e he:,c- the mar l'Thendn 1 2 tv, as .day fort e ;:arties i Mr. 03 r. surprise ora ' , obje ct ..: mt. el); ipetatton Dr. 11 . ..i' • v idenco • l'ael„ '1 sue i of 1.. 4 tclair -tai , Mr. . :.fired alajeg : lice in• 4 ° tic : !cm in. f u u l ct of Amend • La Ti t the r'•• Press ti unt•il' .. stA c i e • . . • tough sh ou ld L itetl t . • - • Wh riX:— • • SeC, Ju d tse !' L- ,tx• ▪ " ket :••••••• • ~„~• v / ~„ ..~ ;~ t