Star. — London, England, 1809-02-18 00:00:00

and when the prisoner was again brought in, the Chairman addressed him to the following effect Captain Sanden, I am instructed to inform you,' that already a very heavy punishment has been in flicted on you for gross prevarication in your evi dence, and that if you still persevere in gross preva rication, you will find that you have not already ex peiienced the 'whole of the punishment which the House has it in its power to inflict." • Captain SANDEN declared he would not prevaricate, but would speak the truth. Q. (By Mr. WHITBREAD.) Do you recollect that in a conversation with Colonel Namilton, you stated this note to have been destroyed ? A. No, 1 do not recollect that I said so. Q. (Be . Sir G. WARRENDER.) Were you to receive any future advantage or emolument, for suppressing this part of the evidence ? A. No, certainly not. — Q. What was the motive which induced you'to con ceal the existence of this note, until the punishment inflicted upOn you induced you to mention it ? A. I had no particular motive for keeping it back.—Q. Do you mean to say, that without any direct motive you told a deliberate falsehood yesterday at the bar? A. lam sorry to say that I did.—Q. Did you, or did you not, think this note of importance ? A. Certainly I did. Q. In what way did you think it of importance A. I knew that was the note which I presented to Major Tonyn, which induced him to wait with pa tience for some time longer.—Q. Although you might think this note important, as bearing upon the case, why was it of importance to you to conceal it from the Committee ? I have no particular reason.— Q. When you shewed the note to Colonel Hamilton, did he tell you it was the hand writing of the Duke of York ? A. No ; when I mentioned it to him, he asked me what sort of hand writing it was, whether in a free open hand, or in a small hand ; he also asked me how the t's were formed ?—Q. Did you think that you would have exposed yourself to any danger or inconvenience by acknowledging the note before ? A. No, I did not.—Q. Then why did not you acknowledge it ? A. I cannot tell. • The witness was then ordered to withdraw. Mr. W. SMITH then said, he hoped that Captain Sanden would not be brought again to the Bar to give evidence. He had so completely disqualified himself from any sort of credit, that he thought it would be worse than wasting time to ask him any more ques tions. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he by no means differed with the Honourable Gentleman who spoke last, as to the credibility of the witness alluded to ; but he could wish that he might be permitted to appear once more at the bar, as it might be in his power to give some clue, or throw some light on the papers which had been so recently put under the consideration of the House, in consequence of his prevarication, and the measures adopted thereon. Mr. WARDLE, alluding to the mode in which the present question had been introduced to the Com mittee, and the pomp with which the Chancellor of the Exchequer had brought it forward, as if he (Mr. Wardle) had been guilty of any offence, left it to Gentlemen to say if they felt now as they seemed to have felt last night, and if the evidence adduced sup ported their statement ? He declared most sincerely, that he had never seen Captain Sanden till he saw him at that bar. He had, however, been treated by the Right Hon. Gentleman, as a person who had tampered with the witnesses. He felt, however, that the inuendo was that he had suppressed the evidence. The CHANCELLOR t'if the EXCHEQUER thought the mode in which the Honourable Gentle man chose to address the House most inexcusable. He owed that duty to the Royal Person, or to any other man in a public situation, accused of practices similar to.those imputed to ;he Royal Duke, to act the part he had done. He chose rather to act that part openly, than through the means of others, but he did not in the most distant degree throw out any insinuation against the Honourable Member or any other person. His statement had not been dictated by pomp, but by a quite contrary feeling. Mr. WHITBREAD stated, that according to his conception, nothing, had fallen from the Right Ho nourable Gentleman which should have occasioned uneasiness to his Honourable Friend. Ile thought himself called or. thus far to do justice to the Cl,nte - tenor of the Exchequer, ftnzt aim/ that 'he should have been happy if the same justice had been done to his Honourable Fiend by every Member of the House, as by the Right Hon - airahle the Chancel lor of the Exchequer. He was pleased to have it in his power to bear testimony to the conduct of that Right Honourable Gentleman. Lord H. PETTY concurred with Mr. Whitbread in passing a compliment on the conduct of the Chan cellor of the Exchequer. Mr. WARDLE most willingly apologised for hav ing misconceived the Right Honourable Gentleman's meaning. He never meant to throw out any insinua tion against the conduct, but only as to the manner of the Right Honourable Gentleman. Captain SAN DEN was then called in and examined by Lord FOLKESTONE. Q. Have you any recollection of the time before the appointment of Major Tonyn, at which you shew. ed the note of Mrs. Clarke to Major Tonyn ? A. Eight, nine, or ten days.--Q. I with you to look into that paper. How came it intb the possession of Cap tain .Sanden ? A. It was rolled up as an envelope to the nate from the Duke of York to Mrs. Clarke.--- Q. Why was that bit of paper used as an envelope to the letter ? A. I cannot positively sayL-I really cannot recollect.—Q. Try if you can recollect ?. A. I believe, if my memory will catty me through, it was when the Duke was reviewing the troops on the coast. Mrs. Clarke produced, and then tore off part of it, and gave the bit to the witness.—Q. How could that letter, not having the Duke's name on it, con vey any proof of the other letters being the Dillee of York's'? A. I cannot say.— Q, Why should Major Tony* gain more credit with them than any other ? A. I cannot say. Q. (By GENERAL LOFT.) How came you to go to Mrs. Clarke's that day ; was it by accident, from intention, or in consequence of her solicitation Was any other person present ? A. I can't say.—Q. On what business did you go there ? A. On her so licitation, that I might go to Tonyn's, and shew the note from the Duke of York.---.Q.Was it a contrivance between Mrs. Clarke and you to keep Mr ? Tonyn from reclaiming his papasl A. I knew of no con trivance. .4 The witness went on to lime. that the note was given to him, and he took it to Major Tonyn. It was no contrivance by Mrs. Clarke and the witness to fabricate the note. Captain Huney Sitenzte was remanded to New gate. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER then suggested that the Chairman should report pro gress, and ask leave to sit again on Monday, if it should be found necessary. The House was accordingly resumed, and the Committee ordered to sit again on Monday. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated, that an Hon. Member had suggested doubts as to the authenticity of the letter, many of the charac ters being written with more formality than was per ceptible in the general writing of his Royal Highness. It might therefore be proper that the writings now on the table should be kept locked up in the custody of the Clerk, that Members of the House should have access to them, and also such other persons acquainted with the comparison of writings as might be suggested, and whom the Speaker might approve of. After some conversation this suggestion was acceded' to, and the hours for inspection of the papers were fixed to be from eleven in the forenoon to three in the after noon.—Adjourned at Half-past One o'Clock. HOUSE OF LORDS. • •.- Gregion's Divorce Bill was read a third time 'nd passed. The Malt Duty Bill, the £10,300,000 and £1,500,000 Exche quer Bills Bills, were read a second time, and committed for Monday. On the motion of Earl BATHURST, Accounts were ordered of the number of British Ships which had cleared out front the British Colonies in North America, and the West Indies,' for 1807 and 1805.. On the motion of Lord GRENVILLE, after a few words from Earl BATHURST, an Account was ordered of the amonnt of Exports and Imports between this country and Spain and Fur ! tugal. • MILITIA. • On the motion of the Earl of LIVERPOOL, the Militia En ..stinent Bill was ordered to be read a second time on Monday, and thu Lords to he summoned. The Earl of ROSSLYN expressed a wish to have sonie Re turns laid before the House respecting the Military Force of the Country—to which the Earl of LIVERPOOL said there ,was no objection. ORDERS IN COUNCIL. Lord GRENVILLE rose to make his promised motion. It wonld, he said, be in their Lordships re collection, that in consequence of the sentiments felt and expressed by every class of merchants and ma nufacturers in this kingdom, he had, _on a former oc casion, distinctly and fully stated his opinions and his arguments upon the question, which this night his duty called upon him again to bring before their Lordships, a question involving not merely the com mercial and financial interests, but the rolitical and moral justice, nay, in its ultimate effects, the safety, perhaps the existence, of the Empire. It would likewise, he said, be in the recollection of their Lordships, that when upon a former occasion he addressed them on this subject, he was induced by a motive of fairness and candour towards his Ma jesty's Ministers, and for the sake of obtaining more correct information on some essential points than at that time appeared before the House, he meant the propositions made by the American Government to the King's Ministry respecting the Orders in Council and the Embargo ; and here his Lordship said, he felt it incumbent on him to make atonement for some expressions which on that occasion had fallen from him in consequence of a misrepresentation which had been made to him of the Speech delivered by the Pre sident to the American Congress. The Noble Lords on the oppcetite side would do him the justice to re member, that, under the impression of the statement made by the Noble Secretary of State, of the drift and substance of that Speech, his Lordship had frankly and implictly acquiesced in thd unfairness then ascribed to Mr. Jefferson, and in his partiality to France. His Lordship had since been able to as certain, with more correctness, the truth of those expressions uttered by the President, by which not only himself, but -many other Noble Lords, had been misled. From the authentic and printed documents upon their Lordships table, to which he should pre sently resort, he would make it manifest to every Noble Lord who heard him, that, so far from un fairness, or partiaTity exhibited on the par:. of Ame rica against this Country, and in favour of France, nothing could possibly be more fair or impartial, exceptindeed what his Lordship maintained was truly the case, a partiality, and avery important one, in favour of this country. The propositions sent by the American Government to that of this Country, were said to be so framed as to threaten hostility and a junction with France, in case of our refusal to meet their offered suspension of Embargo, by cancelling the Orders in Council, while their proposal to France re quired no other equiYalent than the withdrawing of their Commercial Restrictions. Now the papers be fore their Lordships will shew, beyond the shadow of ally doubt, that the terms advanced by America to France, and this Government, were not only in their sense and spirit, but in their very terms of expression, precisely and literally the same. Here his Lordship read the instructions sent by the American Govern.; ment to Mr. Armstrong in Paris, and to Mr. Pinck ney ill London, whereby it appeared that the pro posal to this Government was, that, on the part ofl America, the Embargo should be suspended, pro sided we would rescind the Orders in Council; and this being agreed upon, it was added, that should France refusa to cancel her Decrees, she must ne cessarily go to war with America, The same proposition, and in the same terms, was made to. the Government of France ; so that here was a fair opportunity of not only conciliating the Ame rican States, and restoring the good understanding, and the solid advantages from it resulting to both countries, but a strong probability was afforded of a cordial and active co-operation, by a powerful Ally, in prosecuting war against the common enemy. His LOrdship reprobated, in very strong terms, the con duct of Ministers, which appeared to have been sug gested by no motive of wisdom, justice, or policy, but to grow out of a principle of petty and despica ble pride. Bonaparte had boasted, or threatened, that he would leave us without a single'Ally, and Ministers appeared desirous, by the display of a silly, romantic, and ruinous spirit, to meet him •on the ground he had chosen. They reminded him of a certain person, pf whom he had somewhere read, that, having received a severe Wound, was, by the orders *of his friends; prevented from receiving any kind of medical or surgical aid, until it should be fairly tried whether the wound of itself was really mortal or not. From the papers on the table, he de. duced a deplorable falling off in the amount of Im ports and Exports from and to the American States last year. His Lordshipnext adverted to the deplorable condition in which multitudes of industrious manufac turers, with their families, were placed by the perni cious operation of these orders. In Manchester alone forty thousand were now unemployed. In Birming ham, Sheffield, and other great towns of manufacture, the proportions of distress were correspondent. The same was true in almost ever, .dther part of the Em pire. In Ireland especially, the whole of the northern district, that part of the kingdom 'the most industrious, populous, and prosperous, WAS reduced to a condition of unexampled distress. It had been customary for the soil of that part of Ireland to produce annually forty-five thousand hogsheads of flax seed, of which thirty-five thousand were constantly sent to America. With respect to that most important article corn, it _was well known to their Lordships and to the world, that this country did not produce a. quantity of it at all adequate to its own consumption ; and now that we were deprived of all our former sources of supply from the northern ports of Europe, it became peculi arly necessary to obtain it through America.. But if 'Ministers, as seemed to be their object, were deter mined to force that country into war with us, what .might be the consequence, in this point of view, ir would well become their Lordships seriously to con,- sider.—His Lordship concluded by moving, " That an humbli Address be presented to his Majesty, humbly to represent to his Majesty, that in consequence of certain Dee: erees made by his Majesty's enemies, contrary to the usages eV war, and to the rights of neutral nat ions ; and also in consequence of the alledged acquiescence of neutral nations in the said D, trees, his Majesty was advised to issue certain Orders in Council , respecting the trade of neutrals to and from the ports and coun tries of his Majesty's enemies : and that the said Orders were further enforced by certain Acts passed in the last Session of Par liament : but that both in the said Orders and in the Acts passed thereon, a power was reserved to his Majesty of annulling the same, whenever such revocation should appear expedient. " That the Congress of the United States of America, alarm ed at the dangers to which neutral commerce was exposed, by the said Decrees, and by the system then known to be in the contemplation of his Majesty's Government, and actually carried into effect by the said Orders in Council, passed laws for laying an immediate embargo on all American vessels and exports. " And that by the operation of such laws, all trade of export, from' the said States into this kingdo.o or its dependencies, has been prohibited, and the commercial intercourse of his Majesty's subjects with the said States has been, in other respects, essen tially impeded. " That in the month of August last, the Minister of the United States, resident at this Court, made to his Majesty's Govern ment an authorised and explicit offer of re-establishing the said ' intercourse, proposing, that if his Majesty's Orders in Council should be repealed, as far as regarded the United States. the Em bargo imposed in the said States should be removed, as far as regarded his Majesty's dominions; and adding, that if his Ma jesty's enemies should not rescind their Decrees, the said Embargo should be continued as with respect to them. " That this offer on the part of the United States appears to us just in principle, and in its tendency highly advantageous to the essential interests of this country. lust, in as much as it removed all pretence of the acquiescence of the United States in the French Decree; which acquiescence was the only ground on which any right could accrue to his Majesty to ieterrupt the innocent com merce of a Neutral Power ; and advantageous to Great Britain, inasmuch as it it should not have produced the Repeal of the French Decrees (the avowed purpose of his Majesty's Orders), it must have secured to this country the exclusive commerce of Ame rica, and the Alliance against a Power which has become the come mon enemy of both. "'Tat we believe and hope that it is still open to his Majesty to renew, on the basis of this proposal, the commercial inters course between this country and the United States; every inter ruption of which we consider as manifestly injurious to the inter- I est of both, and particularly calculated, in the present crisis, 'to assist the designs of our enemies,and to weaken our own resources. " That we, therefore, must humbly pray his Majesty to adapt, without delay, such measures as may best tend to the immediate re-establishment of the conunerctal intercourse between his Ma. jesty's dominions and the United States of America, and to bring, by temperate and conciliatory negociatioe, all other points of dif ference to a just and amicable conclusion. " Assuring his Majesty of oue firm and invariable support, iri maintaining, against every unjust aggression, and every novel claim, the ancient and essential maritime rights of his Majesty's Crown." Lord BATHUSRT then rose, and remarked with strong emphasis on the novelty of the Address, and said, as it was the obvious intention of the Noble Lord to convey a censure upon Ministers for their supposed misconduct, it would have been more manly to have proposed an Address to remove Ministers at once, than ; by a side wind to impeach them for misconduct. The Noble Lord then went into a discussion of the French Decrees, that gave rise to the Orders in Council, and justified their expediency, which he said the late Mi nistry had themselves admitted by the Order of Coun cil issued on the 7th of January, 1807. He denied that the embargo was the consequence of the Orders in Council issued by this country, as those Orders were not lshown in America till three days subsequent to passing the Embargo Act. He also denied that the deficiency of four millions in our exports, was attri butable to that embargo, and the operation of the Or ders alluded to ; on the contrary, it originated more from the operation of the Non-Importation Act, and the diminution of our trade to the Baltic. His Lord-- ship next alluded to the scarcity of flax seed and tim ber, which the Noble Baron had laid so much stress upon, and had drawn so alarming a picture about. He said it was true that great supplies of flax seed could not be expected from 'Canada before June next, and though large speculations for a supply of that article had been made on the Continent, tt was cer tainly one that could not be satisfactorily relied on fur the present use ; but in case both those soufces failed for —At t e m th o e m ohse e raid n pre t d , aet yet there were large tracks of land in Ireland, which had very properly been employed 0,121. in the culture of flax seed, which would for the pre-' sent furnish a requisite supply. His Lordship next read a variety of returns of imports from South America, and argued, from their progressive increase, the most beneficial results might be expected. The tonnage ist-Hrtv.oa.inovsie. staves imported in 1807 was 14,434, and for 3-4ths of the succeeding year 1808, it amounted to 30,735. million In ; 18 a 0 n 7 d therein thewere n3hdei seven et l ehhi 6 volte , :du 2 nsor n 96, f 9 resttdlthh l s o oeyto a ruoees d sai s artnwh: o dhee f aer timber nrepiednr aiwnitoesochnriepee import edprincipal second. n enforced by the Noble Mover, that of rescinding the Orders in Council, and observed, that by repealing those - Orders, on the suggestion of America, we s L h oorud Ordersl power,ds. a b pnn e deaacknowledginguberens t eeelvff eveeerthe, cs ascendancy e at objecth nation. at o f br ingi ng rf ns g s t m ed, France to reason, and inducing her to repeal her de crees against our commerce, then would his Majesty rescind use Order's in Council ; and concluded with giving Isis-decided negative to the address. 31;: • Lord SIDMOUTH arred on the propriety o f e, e Address, and differed with his Noble Friend as to some of the grounds he had advanced in support of it. His Lordship defended the Order of Council of the 7th of January, 1807, and said, it was issued N r the pjirpose of preventing the French from carrying on their coasting trade under a neutral flag. H e said; it did not militate against the just, legitimate, and innocent trade of the neutral ; nor did it invad e the laws of nations. He thought Ministers had done wrong in rejecting the offers of America in August last, and hoped to see the intercourse renewed. said Ministers must take their stand on sound princi. pies, and not suffer them to compromise our interests, by becoming the carriers of the enemy's produce frca t his colTonies ; but, at the same time, they should out the hand of amity and reconciliation. Lord MELVILLE spoke at great length, at took a comprehensive view of the subject. He said, the Berlin Decree had two objects ; first, it prescribed regulations for neutral nations, without the power cf enforcingthose regulations ; and, secondly it menaced the maritime world with that same sort of tyranny that France had spread over the several States of the Continent. The Orders in Council that followed were justified as measures of retaliation, and said, that neutrals, while they talked of their rights, should also think of their duties, and keep an even hand with the belligerents. His Lordsh i p said, the best -security for.. e ,ntantime rights of neutrals, was t h e ,observance of the principles of war laid down in 1750,-Which.probitaited neutrals from protectir.g the :Coasting Ohdete itte enemy with their • flag, and ac knowledged the right ofialockade, and the right of checking contraband trade. It was true his Lord ship said, that America had offered to take off I,:r embargo, .if we would rescind our Orders in Coun cil ; the consequence of which would be, that Ame rica Would get rid of a grievous hurthen, and would be enabled to become the carriers of the enemy's ca. lcinial produce. If England was to consent to that proposition, she would immediately abandon her mea sures_ of retaliation zgaitast France, and defeat the ob ject for which those Orders were originally framed At'the same• time, he did tint wish the prosperity of this country should be encreased by the adversity of Atinerica ; or that we should drive her mta the arms of France. He thought the existing differences ,:c.i,zht yet be reconciled, and he trusted in God they v:ou.,± be. But the pressure was not so great as to call for the interposition of the House in the way suggested, or warrant the Address proposed. He saw nothing Sp . condemn Ministers for in the part they had taken with- respect to the Orders in Council, and he could not condemn them without condemning the whole House, which had-agreed to them after mature con ' sideration, and many lengthened discussions. He should therefore give his negative - to the Address. • Lord AUCBI.AIi 1) supported the Address, and enforced the arguments of the Noble - Mover. • The LORD CHANCELLOR took a comprehensive vita of the subject, defended the Conduct of Min stets, and insisted ups; the expediency of the Orders la Council, Lord ERSKINE spoke in support of the motion. The Earl of LIVERPOOL answered the arguments of the No , ls'e Baron; and defended the 014 res hi Oatmeal on did principle of rotcliatioo.. His Lordship de-1 that the Revenutiof the cour.• try was . in a ifoking state, se , • - iba4 by the Noble Lord oppo site ; on the contrary, the surplus of the Catelidated hind alone had inctiaced; during the last'ehres yerits, to the nun 4: £3,1135,000.• —.Lord GRENVILLE replied. • question was then put, and the House divided on Lord Grldirildtl motion.—Contents 64, Non-cosgents 51; 115. Proxies - - - -',tents 39;70. Majority 45. -" Adjourned at half past 9 or • - Yesterdly Sii DAyla Baits. set off lit his own cotrizinfr.o Portsmollth for sown. attended by Dr. M‘Gaitoott, and Captain Gime:soar, Aid-de.t amp . • The second battalion of the - 38th Rs/intent of Poot, quartered at Abingdon;. have !nun Oltir march for Plymouth. • The Deanery of.Sctisatrav, : alluded to in Mrs. CLARIteS ex. amination, has been presented to a young Gentleman who mar ried one of the Duke of Bt4iitollt3'il daughters. Mr. Ti Laor had previously obtaiifed the Deaneriof Exeter sfitoe his Marr:ale. LLNT MUSICAL4.--4.ast nleht the . Oratorio season at the irriarket may lie said to Flee regularly co'rninenced. Tte appearance of the audiences and the satisfactica they expressed were indicative of a sueccssful spt cx atian. Thursday a very moieneholy accident happened at Frentford. .As the Oxford post coach was passing through that place, tl e door V it flew open, and a most affectionate and interes tin g little girl, about six years of age, second daughter of Mr. Roberscn, Attorney, of Oxford, who was in her way to school, fell out, ant the wheel of the coach passing over her head, she was kilied en thh spot. The Intrepid, in fourteen days, from Alicant, with Spar.ie: wool, has arrived in the Downs, bug she brings no news. • Another vessel, the Traveller, alas strived at Liverpool fr,:t. New-York, with 500 bags of cotton. She sailed on the 16th t. t. The cotton was shipped in a few hours only. and she put tc see before the bonds required by the Embargo Act were eat:voted. The Jant, Brown, from Quebec, for Grangemouth, has pa into Newfoundland, with the loss of fort -mast, bowsprit, and anchor and cable. - ul The Swan, ---, from Limerick, for London, has uystt lioundstone Bay. Cargo saved. The New Guide, (an American) Croaker frost Alicant, was : captured of Dover on the 12th ult. and carried into Ca:ais. The Adventure, Horn, bound to Jamaica, and the U7:i an., I Lag, for Barbadoes, have put back to Cork. The Union, liines, fraer. Cork, for Earbadoes, has put back to Vintry Ear. Ptvatotf - r as, 18..—This evening arrived the IMPLACABLE , of 7S guns; last from Torbay, to repair the damage she sustained last weektiii,e severe gale. Arrived the PALLAS frigate, of sZ guns, Hooourakle s 4 F. SETRIOTII; the Marmara, of 32 B;/S. Captain Haiwarliss,:frolo a eruize ; the MINSTREL sloop of is guns, Captain Hetaitsviorra, from the eastward ; a.:l the SereLcow, of 18 guilt, from off Corunna. . Pa.vaiouta Dom Eta. 16,—Several of the unfortunate are drowned by the upsetting of the Barfleues launch, have been Washed on shore, -and awing the rest, the unfortunate Foot, of the Marines. Poi-rissettre, Vas. 17.—Nothing arrived or sailed this day Dropt down to St. Helen's his 7 Majesty's• ship Quebec; a!ic tht• Candi; Batt 'nehmen. About 40 sail of transports are crciet , d to Cork under convoy of his Majesty's slap Port Mahon. DM, Fee. 17.,—Sailed his Majesty's 'ships Rot:di and rc:r on a cruise. Came down from the River, the Mary, 1/.:KIJN, for the Brazils; Indispensible, Barr, for the SaUth ; ar! several other ottward bound vessels, which remain in the Do,Ar; with his Majesty's ships, Ste. as per last, —Wird S.W. Gt.svcsitso, "Es. 17.—Passed by the Flaiton, Spurs, from Quebec ; and the Johanna, from' Lisbon.—Sailed the C.:cad ,, Dews ;Ind the Baltic Merchant, Smith, for St. Vinunt's ; Go' thuds, 'Lowe, for Teneriffe ; Centurion, Douglas, V.'illiara L.csh iugton, Sally, and the Jack Tar, Grant, for Jamaica. Yasimotrr Ft, FRll.l7.—Arrived the Euryalus frigate,! Z,;-.6313 sloop, and Censor gun-brig.—Sailed the Calypso sloop of sts.tr,4: l Seselark schoopef.—Witid S.W. Maitatits.—On Tuesday last, at Astbury, in Clieshtro, ' o ` ' o Antrobus, Esq. of Cheszn, Surrey, to Mrs. Bence, of ll<<o::S'•:r, street, Qusep•square. PlitleE 6 7 1'OCkS 11-11, DAY A • Consols, for mosey, 6711 —for February 67 - i —Onat. •T • Escheoner Bills 12s. to 13s. pre. 0/4bON : Printed and Published by LEVEL KENT, of CA tetbit:y Ylsee, Lambeth, at the 5T1_11..07 TIC it, No. 1, Ls °j' street Ptibiblied taw athe STAR...Of h:11% Temple nar. IIPP" , I 'li l t , , • • 1 1 . 4 • :10 1 . Nu a g 4.41 _ Fa Tem( ,On 1 opera, geenerl entireli ;t a ke c- af ' l lOOl d- le- Tat, tat ra- from . ki :d ti o . of *here of cs,J ms 11414 eior "ht alsont 4' l '4 for aa esti ed, irg Ken uld from wle p t` die of !Olt- tut NO He soal I tilt 13 1 ) .Y )1 whati War rr of these ar.da he fair. No , T.Ne ecCir 3PF and 0- lund the • tat 4: Lord rlroxies nut 9 Fur .ft).3 l the aitaza Vf 1 lied rterrd tu: r's ex. f"' I:At rr.ar- LIQT 14 yes at the The of ,teset4 ect • fos Itford. sal tl e yl g little ful ferSCD, L:t, ani ['led ea Itu ;par.ie: 4 1 1 frlm erh tt stl ?".1t i:1!0 anchor apt!. Lti nt, was ,S. es, fr2r. ICARLIt ustained e, of Ss: 32 gs,tlS, )p of 19 rid thr late urea ve bert c • is day the e crdtr d nd 1"3:e ft.:KsaN , as ; it DC" k o irs, from • ; G r 4. • • Zc7.0 .013 • 6..3 fvon:hiet• i r, of CA' 1, Ca nar. 4