Star. — London, England, 1811-08-24 00:00:00

• li. BEAUTY. " The wind paueth over it, and it is gone,"--.-Ossias. I saw a dew-drop, cool, and clear, Dance on a tnyale spray ; Fair colours deck'd the lucid tear, Like those which gleam, and disappear, When showers and iun-beams Sol cast athwart a glance severe, And scorch'd the pearl away. High en a slender, polislid stern, A fragrant lily grew ; On the-pure pet:ifs, many a gem Glittred, a native diadem Of healthy morning dew— A blast of ling'ring Winter c:!ne, And snapp'd the Rem in rwo. ratter than Morning's early teat, On lily's snowy bloom, Shines Beauty h its sternal year, Bright', spat kling, fascinating, clear, Gay, thoughtless a Its doom— Death breathes a sudden poison.near, And sweeps it to the sorb. LAIP INTELLIGENCE. T. T. . iIENRY OGLE v. ROolpt o'coNston. DUBLIN, AUGUST 20. —This was an action to re. cover damages for an assault, for which the defendant was convicted at the last Spring Assizes of Trim, and confined one month, various statements of wfich ap. peared in the public prints, and in a pamphlet written on the subject, signed O'Connor. It eame on to be tried at Trim last Saturday, before Judge DAY and a Special Jury, when they found for the plaintiff £lOO damages. COURT OF CHANCERY, AUGUST fa. NOCEN V. MURRAY. This was an application fer an injunction to stop the sailing of a vessel called the Ocean, which is about to take her departure for America. This vessel was the property of Mr. C. Murray, of New York, from which place she railed to some port in the Mediterra nean, and took from thence a valuable cargo for St. Petersburg)), at winch place, or in England, the Cap tain was empowered tt sell her. She was not, how ' ever, sold at St. Petersbuth ; but, on her arrival in. England, Was sold by Mr: Redgrave, the ag..tnt of Mr. Murray, to the plaintiff, for 42,800. This injunc tion was applied for on , the grounds that another power of an attorney had been made nut by Mr. C. Murray, empowering his brother, Mr. G. Murray, in this country, to sell the vessel; and because the sale was an illegal one, the agent having received no con sideration for the vessel, but having sold her .to the .plaintiff because he was indebted to him in a consider able sum of money. Besides, both the agent and the plaintiff were bankrupts. To this i. was answered, that the ac,ent had received 42,800 for the vessel :' that if he had become a bankrupt, it was more to his honour than the conduct of many who had kept themselves out of the Gazette, for he had paid 13s. in the pound. and WAS obliged to declare himself bankrupt, for the more effectually collecting his debts, that all his creditors might be paid fairly. As fiir the plaintiff, he never was a bankrupt, but now car ries on business to a very large extent. The Loan CHANCELLOR ordered, that an affidavit should be made out of th. 2 consideration which the plaintiff had given for the vessel, without which lie ceuld not proceed to give judgment in the case. EX PARTE DE TASTE?, IN THE MATTER OF COItSFORD Sir SAMUEL Roseau' stated, that in consequence of what had pasted at the aretiing of this c iSc yesterday, Mr. Langston had deemed it pr.per to ha wean affidavit filed for the put pose of explaineig tl .e facts connected with the attachments in the Lord Meyer's Cow t.— An a flidevit had aceordiiegly been sworn by Mr. Rey na% partner. to Mr. Jones, Solicitor in the Lord Mayor's Court, sating the history of the actions in that Court, and of the attachments following thereon, from which it appeared, that on the 28th July, an ac tion was brought by Messrs. Larleston and Timmins, against Thomas Cornford, on which an attachment to the amount of £4OOO issued and was duly served on the same day, on Messrs. Everett and Co. : that, on the 14th August following that action and attach ment were withdrawn, and a similar action was brought in the name of Langston and Timmins, against Thomas Cornford and George Cornford, as jointdebtors,oa which on the same day an attachment, stipperted by the necessary affidavit follovred; and was duly served on Messrs. Everett and Co.: that on the 13th November following another attachment, which was intended to cover sums which had subsequently come into the hands of the bankers, was also sued out against the effects of Thos. and Geo.Cornford,and was in like manner duly servedon Messrs.Evt rens, hut that no f r e s h affidavit was filed in support of this last at tachment, such not being required by thepractice of the Lord Mayor's Court. The deponent also awn* that he had charged, and been paid by Mr. Teasdale, the fees of these different attachments. ' . Mr. BELL, on the other side, held in his hand an a ffi daiit by Mr. Lowe, as i o his having made a tho r ou g h *nd complete search in the books of the Lord Mayor's Court, from 16th July to 2lst December, both days in clusive,and that though he had found the two entries of the attachments of 28th July and 14th August, he had • not been able, after the utmost care and diligence, to discover any trace of an attachment issued on the Ifith November, or between the 14th August and the 21st December. Sir S. Rosettes contended, that there could be no '. call on Mr. Langston to file another affidavit in answer to this affidavit, which they had seen for the first time to-day. The affidavit which he (Sir S. Romilly) had Wad was made by k gentleman of respectability, an lacer belonging to the Court whence the attachments bad issued,' whose veracity his Lordship could have no reason to question, and who positively swore to two ex isting attachments at the period of the bankruptcy.—.. Observing that this case had got into the public Pa pers, he (Sir S. Romilly) hoped he might be excused 1 in saying, though he knew nothiag of Mr. Langston, except what he saw of him in this cause, that the con duct of Mr. Langston, throughout the whole business, had to hit (Sir S. Romilly's) conviction been most ho inout able and upright: Mr. Bete contended that the affidavit he had just (read required an answer. His (Mr. Bell's) learned AUGUST 29. ' The Loan Clikecer.cote &livered judgment in the two petitions in the matter of the Comfort's. In the petition of Mr. Langston, he directed that the Corn fords should go before the Commissioners. The case in the petition of Pe Tastet and Co. be considered as one of the most singular and important that ever came' before him in bank ruptcy.‘ His Lordship then com mented on the different affidavits that were presented to him in the case. Althottgitin the first affidavit, filed in the Lord Mayor's Court by Mr. Langston, in order to sue out the attachment, he only swore to the debt as 'against Thomas Cornford,.yet it did not thence fol low, that another person might not be a joint debtor with Thomas Cornford in the same debt. Besides, it appeared, that the correction made in the second :affidavit, - when Mr. Langston applied for a second attachment on the 14th of August, was at the sug gestion of Thomas'Cornford, and the ready acquies cence of Mr. Langston in that suggestion shoved that he had no difficult* in swearing as to the exact nature of the debt. As to the act of bankruptcy, he certainly conceived th;:t it was a concerted act of bankruptcy. His Lordship adverted to the situation in which Mr. Teasdale was placed by the conflicting duties he had to perform. If Mr. Teasdale himself was the petitioning creditor, the act of bankruptcy would not be valid. It appear ed, however, from Mr Teasdale having suggested no difficulty as to an act_ of bankruptcy against Thomas and George Corn ford affcctingi Mr. Langston's debt, that he consider ed that debt a 3-int one. It was alto in evidence, that Mr. Lang:aon disliked the Commission of Bank ruptcy, inasmuch as it would deprive him of the be -I'nerit of his attachment; and Mr. Langston had, therefore, a right to call upon him (the Chancellor) not to stipersede it. It was very nriterial, that George Cornford no where swore that it was a separate debt; and as to Thomas, he, in answer to Everett's Bill in Chancery, s'a ore to what be now totally denied.— It was strange too, that there was no dispute of the validity of this commission, from November, 1810, to the August following ; and it was very suspicious,. that the Corntords should have said, that they would dispute its validity as loag as they should be suppnt ed by the petitioners. Mr. Leach had said, that,' even allowing the source of his evidence to be pollu-, ted, yet that there were auxiliary circumstances, such as the account in Mr. Langston's books being beaded separate, which made that evidence wear the colour of truth. He should be very sorry to risk the sending of a case to a jury upon such evidence. If this was actually the petition of the bankrupts, let them bring their action; but if it was the petition of the petitioning creditors, which it purported to be, let them consider whether they ought to go to a jury supported by such exidence ? He should dismiss Ms Itetilion wish costs, and then let the bankrupts bring whatever action they pleased. SURREY SPECIAL SESSIONS. INS/LIMIT DEBTOR& SIR EDWARD 0 9 8111 EN PRICE, DAIIT. This interesting case of imputed fraud came on upon the opposition made to the liberation of the pri soner under the present Insolvent Act, and the oppo sition was both to the form of the Gasette and other notices, and tothe merits of the defendant's detainer. It was proved in evidence that the real name used by Sir Edward, many years ago, on his first aequaintanee with the witness, was Parker Bernard O'Brien—that at times he spelled his name with a y instead of an i, in the sirname Brien, and at ether times omitted the 0 altogether. In further proof of this practiceshe Ga zette, and several letters or writings of the defendant were produced and r and by which the bill ground. ing the detainer in this instance, drawn at Alfred , place, Bedford-square, one of the last places of abode of the defendant, was omitted to be entered in the no tices, although it was well known that the famousßank of the defendant, with all its numerous epithets, had I been there held, inasmuch that every appearance ex isted of an endeavour toevade the provisions of the In solvent Debtor's Act, on the part of the defendant, which was sufficient for the present, to refuse him any reliet under such practices, as to matter of form . The attachment of the Irish to their 0, and of the Scotch to their Mac, was stated as presumptive evi denCe of gross fraud in any maw leaving such an ap. pendage out of his name and tide, even when travel ling into this country. On the other side, in favour of the defend nt, it was contended with much ingenuity and learned cum- Ilinr.—_ • • , : : ; . , friends and himself had argued this case on the footng Anent upon the meaning and origin of the 0 and Mac, of excluding altogether the testimony of the Cornford;.. as part of names,that they were only like bad spelling, —Even on this footing, the case on the part of 1 which, by a legal maxim, vitiates not the deed or the petitioning creditors, they (the Counsel for the record respecting title, but not an essential part 1 petitioners) were bold enough to assert, was of so sus- of the name, being merely descriptive of the,estatee picious a name, as to call on his Lordship to send it or of the Christian names of the parties' ancestors, to a Jnry. The petitioning creditor, Mr. Langston,, or fathers', as patronomics—the 0 being an ab had sworn that an account standing in his own books , breviation of the word Of, as the son of Brien is in the name of Thomas Cornford alone, was a credit called O'Brien, and the son of Mahon, M‘Mahon ; given by his house to Thomas and George Cornford, I Mac being the Irish and Erse of son. to enable them to carry on the business of goal-mere On these grounds the objections to the defendant's ' chants ; yet this account, it appeared, in the course of ; different names as to such ingredients, was strenuously seven months, amounted to the sum of £389,000! ! resisted, and strongly animadverted upon as futile and Was not this a circumstance so extremely suspicious I scandalous, as the defendant had only the O'Brien part as to warrant his Lordship in requiting farther inves-1 of his name through his grandmother, and had the tigation, and to induce him for that purpose to send it surname of Price, or as he sometimes spelled it, Pryce, to a Jury ? The petitioning creditor, however, had in . by his father's family, and had only waited till the addition sworn, that, at the time of sning out the corn- . age of 21 years to take up his title of Baronet. The mission, he Ind two attachments against the bank- Justices were unanimous in considering the description rupts, whice would thereby be disappointed. An affi- . fraudulent or insufficient, and ordered the Prisoner to dark was now filed, in which it was sworn. that, on • be remanded. a minute search of the books of the Lord Mayor's 1 Mr. John Richardson was opposed en the grhund Court, the only two attachments of which any vestige . of nut inserting in his schedule a certain estate called could be traced, were the separate attachment against ! Coxy, which it was stated he had represented himself Thomas of the 28th July, and the joint attachment of ' the owner of, in remainder or expectancy, on the death the 14th August. And was it not essential that this of his lather. A letter in his own handwriting was fact should be fully ascertained? 1 shewn to him, which he at first seemed not to know, The LORD CHANCELLOR saw no occasion for any i but, being cautioned, admitted to be his writing, its farther affidavits. His Lordship had made up his which he represented himself as heir to such estate. mind on this case ; but there being one affidavit which The Magistrates considered the prisoner, without he had not yet 'had time to read, and being desirous rendering a fairer account in his schedule at a future of reading it also, before he gave his judgme n t, he Session, as disqualified, and he was remanded. should dispose of the case to-morrow morning. Mr. James Shaw was opposed on the :round of TA PARTE LANOSTON IN THE MATTEII. OF corteronh. fraud, in not specifying in his schedule ati estate he This was a petition in the same bankruptcy, being held ut the bridge of Eton, and a tan-yard, freehold an application on the part of Mr. Langston, one of the assignees of the bankrupt estate, praying hi s Lord- p roperty , d sold by him, for support of self and family' i ship's order on Themes and George Co rn f or d, the 'ng his confinement. The prisoner considered he bankrupts, to appear before the major part of the hadu" no occasion to insert in his schedule such proper- ty ; but the Justices were of a different opinion, and Commissioners, on a day to be named, to be examined 'touchint , the affairs of the bankrupt estate. After ordered him to be remanded for a defective schedule. bearing' ) Counsel, the prayer of the petition was A Mr.-Robinson was opposed on the ground that grantel. , he had his discharge, which he accepted of on Mon day last, the first day of the Session, from : is Creditor, a Mr. Arian, for a sum of 5e1920, money advanced by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. It was contended on behalf of the Defendant, that hew as not bound to get out of prison by this discharge, after the Marshal had made out and given in his list of prisoners ; but being still detained for his fees, be had a right to take the benefit of the Act, and get clear of all the debts he awed, notwithstanding the discharge in question, which was stated to have been given to him with a view of keeping him from the benefit of the Act, and making him a bankrupt. It was ruled, after a long debate, in favour of the Prisoner, and he was fully liberated by the Act. • 1 LONDON SESSIONS, GUILDHALL. , CONTRACTS OF NAIIIIIED LANES. Mrs. Franco, wife of Mr. John Franco, and daugh ter of Mr. Abraham Franco, was oppoied on her ap plication to take the benefit of the Insolvent Act, by Mr. ALLEY, as Counsel for divers tradesmen and shopkeepers in the town or village of Hounslow, who were defrauded of property to a considerable amount, the Lady not passing herself as a married woman, which she was, and living apart from her husband, by virtue of a voluntary deed of separate mainte. nance, granted to her without any charge of adul tery. It appeared, however, that eke never repre-- sented herself as a single woman. or otherwise than as Mrs. Franco. 6he was therefore not within the case of married women trading on • their own credit within the City of London, and was of course dis charged. The Hon'. Rev. Augustus Henry Barry was op. posed on the ground that he had not included ih his schedule a certain Power of Attorney passed by him to his Attorney relating to certain debentures he had treated about with Lord Chichester. This objection was deemed - sufficient to induce the Court, on. the motion of, Mr. Andrew's Counsel for the Creditors, to bdye the prisoner remanded. , ' The celebrated Mr. Daffy Swinton was opposed, but against all opposition, and as a bankrupt, he was fully discharged. A Mr. Tallertall was opposed by Mr. ALLEY, on the ground that the prisoner had obtained certain bills of exchange on false pretences, which the Learn ed Counsel was ready to prove by unanswerable evi dence. The prisoner not wishing to risk a discussion of the merits, declined the investigation, and was re manded, with a caution from Mr. ALLEY, not to ap pear stein claiming the benefit of- the Insolvent Debtors Act. The prisoner was remanded. On Monday night, as a carrier was going on the road between Southampton and Lymington, 1..? un fortunately drove over a poor sailor, who was lying there, and nearlysevered the man asunder. • 'oe value of Dr. Fasesta>:•s Gum SaLuvantir has been so long proved, that nothing of the present day can bear a. competition with it, in iii the dire. rent stages of a certain disease, which it Effectually cores and eradicates from the habit, without exciting the painful feelings and exposure that attends saliva non—without debilitating the constitution in any de gree, or even requiting confinement from business or restriction of diet. The radical virtues of these ines timable Drops have proved their claim to publ , c ap probation for more than 30 years.. In all the debility of both sexes they prove a never-failing restorative— whether the debility is produced by too free use of mercury, by illicit pleasures, or the effects of a warm climate. To travellers and those going abroad, they cannot be recommended too strongly, as they will re ceive a safe, speedy, and complete. cure, in all olp - stubborn gleets, and every weakness that affects the bladder and organs of urine. By its efficacy many women have become mothers, who for many pears• had been deprived of that happiness.—Sold wholesale and retail, at Mr. Butler's, No. 4, Cheapside, corner of Paternoster-row ; and retail, by Belain and Sharp, Portsmouth ; Hall and Johnson, Gosport ; Album, Weston, Mallory, and Jones, Portsea; Trewman, Exeter ; Cookworthy, Glenville, Gilbert, and Hox land, Plymouth; Newbury, Dublin ; Baxter and Mac donald, Glasgow; Smith, Manderston, Scott, and Cargill, Edinburgh; Crutwell, Bath ; Ross and Peck, Hull ; Gregson and Billinge, Liverpool ; Stains and Lynch, Manchester ; Bowen, Norwich ; Knott and Lloyd, Birmingham ; Gregory, Brighton ; and most Medicine Venders, is bottles, at 2s. 91, Ils. 6d. and and i!25. each. UNIVERSITY lATELLIGEN/ • OXFORD, A 'most . 44.—Thursday, Mr. Richards exhiboloner of Queen's college, in this university. foundation. . recittsias Meat PROMOTION/. Rev. R. Baker, of Goring Heath, (non, to Frilsham, Berks. Rev. F. Marston, to the vicarage of Stokesay, Salop. Rev. G. J. Hamilton, miotster of Harbottle, was r the church and parish of . Ashkirk, in the Presbytery Sunday last the Lord Bishop of Easter instituted th Lempriere, D. 1). and Master of the free and endewei School at Exeter, to the Rectory of Meech, in Devon, The Rev. Charles Jervis, M. A. Domestic Chat Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge, has been the Lord Chancellor to the valuable Rectory of Ten of the priests who have recently Dartmouth from France, have since arri' terford. They had resided about a - ris, and Left that city because they wish,. from the tyranny of Bonaparte, of whose they speak in terms of the most indignant - lifted reprobation. There accompanied Paris an English and a Scotch priest, an, clans, who on landing, went to their respec.. They suffered no particular indignity in inirneyini; through France, but they represent the state of re ligion as at a very low ebb indeed in that country._ Amongst the women there is still some regard fer the rites and ceremonies of the Catholic Church, hut the men seem to have thrown off tall cnnce,rn about Christianity, and the largest church in Paris generally presents no greater congregation on Sundays or holi days, than from twenty to thirty females ; but t in fact, Sunday and holidays are only known within the walls of the houses of devotion. In Rome, before tie order for the dispersion of th•! clergy, there were 5850 priests. Wien the ecclesiastics 01 that city were called upon to take the oath of fealty to the Em peror, as King of Itjtly, only one was found who would do so. The second person who was required to swear, refused. He was immediately embraced brall his brethren, who ursa voce, declared they could acknowledge no other Sovereign of the Pattimony of St. Peter but the Pope. The consequence of which was the arrest of multitudes, and shortly after, only four priests were to be found in the whole city. The venerable Pontiff himself was hurried to the title of Savona, in the Genoese territory, and the pries were transported to different fortresses—SW of them were immured in the dungeons of Alexandria, in Pled moot. Before these Gentlemen left Paris, the Eccle. siastical Council, recently assembled in that city by Bonaparte, had been broken up for not being suf. ciently subservient to his will. It appears that some of the measures recommended to the Council for their adoption, had in view the investiture of Bonaparte with powers inconsistent with the usages, and subser sive of the unity of the Roman Catholic Church.— On this grand point 1(.:S Members of the Council voted against the measure, and only 15 for it, C.,r dinal Maury wits at the head of this trifling minority. SMITHFIELD MARKETAucurr 23. Beef 4s ad to Ss sd Veal 4s sd to 6s ad Mutton 5s 01 to fss od Post Ss sd to is 41 ueAD OF CATTLI T•SS DAV. Beasts, about"7Bo—Sheep and Lambs S ) SCO CAlve., t2o—Pigs, 880 NEWGATE AND LEADENH.ILI. MAR Ise se ad to Is bd 'Vest 4. 1d to es 44 Mattes 4. 4d to Ss. 4d Pork Ss Stl •a tis ad PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW. • ST. JAhlt:f.'S. [CHAPEL, Hay 41. 10s. to RI. Os. Hay 61. Os. to 7s. 16s. Straw 31. Hs. to 41. Isis. (Toyer 71. Os. to 9s. (4. Straw 31. 10:. to Is. PRICE OF HAY AND SI RAW IN SMITiI FIELD. IH.ty 61 os to al Os New Clover 41 10s to 6110 s • New Hay 41 Os to RI (I, Wh eat straw si Os to S l Z . COAL-NlAltliJil', AUGUST Si. Ship. at Market Sio:d rrices. 10 Newcastle 10 119 s• Ott to sf,'s 9d • 1 Suuderlard 1 4.54 toi to oes (id I.ansdown P.tir was held an Moods), swing to tl.e 15th c! August fain this year on Saturday, an d was ounietously atten ded. Fat Ca.tle sold high, but the sale of lean was dull. 'II' -fre was a great number of horses t sjgefty of an inferior and un.c.it sh!e kind. A consideralße qus =lf , cheese was pitched, which sold, the hest coward from oos. to 65a. half colvai d 444 to VCE. rdt was elect , 4 y, on Mr. Mi. the rectory of Salop. vas admitted to ery or Selkirk. d the Rev. John awed Grammar moo. :Ital.lain to h't rn presented by Keuebester, iu ly landed at rrivedat WA. yeat in NJ led to escape )se ITIta , 111:3 t and ungita- -1 them Iron' ►d two physi. active homes. MARRIED. On the 71h Instant, at Dundee, Alemader Hely, Esq. of M. - duel, to Elizabeth, manly tlatighter of D. Martel, E.g. This alarming, Mr. R. Terry, of Holborn, to Miss Owen, of the :strand. DIED. On btlard the ship I.aly C:astiereirs, at sea, on the Ch June Ensign John Craig, of the G9th . reginsent s eon of )(In Craig, Est of Hl:metivld. SY HIS IWAIESTY'S ROYAL LETTERS PATENT. T EAKE's Genuine PILLS, so justly famous for A--. 1 their superior efficacy in curing every degree and symptom of the Venereal Disease, the Scurvy, &c. without confinement or restraint of diet, is an esiy, expeditious, see % and secret mea ner. One small tasteles Pill is a dose, its operation Lutpealwit tible, and requiring no particular attention. In 15 days they generally cure those cruel Disorders ; and Where they fail in that time of perfectly restoring health, the pa tient has the happy assurance that be or she is at the eve of being so restored, let the degree of malignancy be ever so great. It is an excellency peculiar to these Pills, to make directly ;Is the complainbag part, and enter byte contest with the offendin: matter, which they s p eedily dislodge and ex p e l They are decla red by experience to be a preserver of health, as well as a resto rer, by taking only eight single Pills Spring and fall di every ytar, in short, the Patentee has this extraordinary obligation to them, that whatever he promised himself:roof them, they were sure to fulfil and exceed, at thotigh impatient of inane:Nil and uni•erasi fame- These Pills are most worthy a place in the cabinets of Masters and Captains of Ships; the more so, far that they will keep good in all climates any length of time, and that they have now borne the test of near CO years, with Increasing credit to themselves, and honour to their author, insomuch that during the last eight years they have radically cured upwards 0140,000 per sons, many of whom had been discharged from Hospitals where salivation had been frequently.repeated, and all other methods made u.e Qi without eficct. ' Prepared and Sold by the Sole Propreater. Timm es TAT Loi, 111: tuber of the itcya 'College of Surgeons in Londoa,at his hems, No. 9, New Bridge-street; where he will give advice, without ee Fee, to persons taking these Pills, and will answer Pail eats Let ters, if post-paid, on the mine terns, observing in all east, the ntost inviolable secrecy, no patient's name or case having been mentioned, but at their own par:h.olaF request, by the Proprietor• diming the course of more than 40 years, that lie has bad the con ducting of an ei:tensive sale M the above medicine, and the prac, lice aritlug therefrom. They are also 'sold, by his appainnitittit, at the Perfumer's, No 15, St. Alban's-strvet, ; the Toy-slop, No. 10; Ox ford-street; Mr. Dishiirough's, No. 7, Fish-six - tut: Hie, r, aril opposite the .Monumen. ; and by one Person in every cormider-all town in England, Ice. in Bones of only its. ea. each, sealed up with full and plain directions, whereby persons of either sex may cure themselves with case and secrecy. N. B. Every Box saidin Great Britain is sealed'', 'with a stamp, in n hich.by favourof the Comp iissioners, is printed at the Stamp- Office " I'. Taylor, No. 9, New Bridge-greet." to imitate which la Mow. and all others are counterfeit. ...014,00 et 1 Yrotett and pubilehell by Laval. Kau I . ,at No. 80 Chancery-lane, and a the Oast, Lail. So.