Star. — London, England, 1804-12-04 00:00:00

• L 4W INTELLIGENCE. COURT OP KING'S BENCH, DEC. r. AND DIRRITT V. 5. CM e The Plaintiffs are pawnbrok e rs in Prince's-ft.ert; Soho ; the Defendant reticles in Furnival's inn, and is faid to be a member of the learned profit:Gent• Th . :titian was brought on a Bill of Exchang e of the amount of zoo). dated the 3oth of June of the prefent year, payable in two months to the Defendant, was alto the dmthe ac ceptor who it appeared that eihe who it nearly related to a noble and diftinguifbed fa; oily, about the period when this bill was dated, was confiderably embarraffed, and was eztrenttly anxioni to difcharge tome honourable engagements. Being without money, and without refources in an y palpa ble Rate, he applied to Mr. Emden, with whom be bad formed tome acquaintance on the turf, and with whom he had likewife had previous tranfadions in pecantar y matters. It was agreed that the immediate exigencies of this gentleman flsould be fupplied ; but as Come oftenfible fecurity was expedient, as an intro- Bullion into the money market, Mr. Emden drew to the extent of nearly toool, on the Hon. T.W.Co weary, at two months date, for which the Defendant Was to receive the confideration of tol.• in each hun dred, or at the rate of 6o per cent. per annum. One of the bills originating in this negotiation Was the !abject of the prefent anion ; and in the coerce of the trial, a fcene of infamy was exhibited, equally eaten fated, we hope, to awaken the caution srf the ynnng and the ditlipated, and to excite the terror of the de figniag and profligate. Mr. Galilean, in opening this cafe, contented him• (elf merely with delivering up the Kill to be read, becaufe the hand-writing of the drawer, indorfer, and acceptor, were admitted, and alto the non-payment 1 and regular notice to the former. It appeared, wheu 1 , tread by the . Clerk of the Court, to be a bill in the form we have defcrihed, and was made payable at Meffrs. Childs, the bankers of the acceptor. Mr. Easels: s, for the Defendant, Rated, as the deft ground of nbjedion to this claim, that the full value was not given for the bill by the Plaintiffs, it being m ufurious tranfadion, and therefore they were not es titled to recover. The ufnry committed was nht di re& they were too learned in the fcience of money getting', to throw themfelves completely open to de adline under the Blittute of Ufury, and intermediate agents were engaged as an additional means of elud ing this faints , y Statute. The acceptor employed the prefent Defendant, Mr. Emden again had his fub-agent, who picketed the bill to be difcountedity. the Plaintiffs. The name of this palm was Stephen- Fon : he offered the bill, for the purpofe Rated, to Mars. Parker and Burkitt, and was perfeftly aware of their mode of doing bufinefs. " Two hundred pounds was a large tom—they might advance a por tion of the money, but the deficiency in cafh would be eafily fuppiied goOds." The plaintiffs thee advanced 11501. taking not a (billing more than the regular interest of 5 per cent. But the trial Wdt here: for the remaining 4cl. they gave a watch and Come jewellery, eflimated at double its value, fo that they acquired act in the tranfallion by h i s s delbnce evafinn, beyond the legal i nterea. In fupport of ti be called his canto merit fub agent, Mr. Stephenfons who unfortunately had 101 l all recolleCtion o any part of the tranradion. Mr. Glees, however, f who examined him, was e nabled to retie& his memor hisy three Cenral t imes, by letters anti accounts in own ban.? writing. When there were handed tohim, be believed they were written by him, but not until after a long and minute examination, with the affif tance of alarge optical glafs, which he alternately applied to his eye, and to the furface of the paper. — MI the ability of the Learned Counfel, fupported by there permanent documents, could not mead aeon facto from this witnefs of the reference of there pa pers to the identical bill, for which this :talon was brought. Being anted what the watch wee valued at, he laid 81. Being interrooated again, what it obtained he Paid eight gunsees:bet it res/ht be fold math beneath its worth yet in the fespel :t turned out that he was the porehafer. A Lady of talk and fathion, who re faded with the defendaat, wilted for a (mall diamond, as a trifling ornament to force part of her drefs, and to gratify this little fancy, he had prefented her with • a brilliant in exchange for; he watc this whimthe fair female, he had the compenfation of 51. in the form of commiflion, or equal to treble the legal in tend, for executing this reputable negotiation with the Plaintiffs. Lord Ext.ISSOROUOHO••-" I think the Collate' for the defendant has not eflablifhed„ by fuflicieut tehi many, that the plaintiff's fold the gnods confiderahly under their •altse ; and 'inlet's an evident taring and g fraud to elude the R atu te be expofed , th e p laintiffs may be entitled to recover." Mr. ER51t1,15..--" If that he your Lorclfhip's npi• pion, I will prove the bill to be ufurious in its in igi nal concoftion." He then called The Hon. T. \V. Coventry, and preparatory to his admiffion as a witnefs, a releafe was given him by the defendant. Q, Did you give this b ill to the defendant ?—I gave it to him with others, to the amount of nearly a theufand panne's, accepted in the lime foto). q, What was your intention in delivering to him these acceptances?—A. To obtain money to pay fame argent demands. oz yn iat cnoirn faii.in were you to make ol t for o the defend a nt fiir afirlance ?—A. gave . every hundred he accoinmo..lated me with on the bills. to ni Q. What time have they t' ?—A. Two on o 5. Q . , Was this agreement ma d e in the fame room, mist the tame time, whets the bills were prepared ? A• Yes, and I gat e she dclendant the hills to get in any way he plea ted. c lif c ounted t. , r his own heneflt, Q . , y o u ?—A. Ite paid the whole How did he ra T un every tool. which he de money. excepting p eluded. Creft-Erawiseti.ri ky Mr. GARROW. Q, I prciume, Sir, this was name the firs boatiefs Ton nad with the deittrlint ?—A. It was not. Q„ Perhaps this was .6 turf tranfaCion :—A. It was not. I Cuppore, Sir, Too have had turf nerciations with this Gentleman hut thofe are honourable en cvements, in which this moon-thine does not appear I ihEy are to be paid iu hard cath ?—A. Yes, they arc, Sir. Mr , 006‘10W 4 the Yiry.—oa The debts incurred on toe turf are to bie'anfwered on the fpot, will) the molt rigid punituality, while tradefmen, who peter a man of (Anon in the ghnfily chataiter of duns, ate to be fent away as empty as they came." Q ` Having honourable blood in your veins. I am floe, Sir, you would have thought it infamous not to intend to pay this bill?—A. I fhould. Q, Were you at large, Sir, when tbefe bills were presented to you ?—A. I was. . . Q. Were you prefent when they were drawn?— A. T was with the defendant at the time. Q .:. I fuppofe he had not the coin ready, that was to be attrafted by the magnet of this paper ?—A. I do not know ezaftly when he produced the money. Q Then, when be paid the money, you fettled his remuneration of ten per cent ?—A. This was agreed on at the time of making the bill. Q :... Did he tell you at the fame time, that this agreement would convert thefe efficient bills into wane paper ?—A. He Paid nothing to that dice.. Mr. &skim s.--.. After this tettimony, I can have no motive to re-examine Mr. Coventry to a tingle particular." • Mr. GARROW commented at great length on the evidence ; be fani, in the cafe of Lamb and Size land (a cafe we have laid before our readers), be had spoken in the fpirit of prophecy, that Would that infamous attempt fuccecd, the eztenfive cit. culation of paper, fit beneficial in a great comener eial country, would be cut up. root and branch, by the detefiable arts of the molt profligate of the hu man fpeeies. The anfwer to this obfervation was, that his Lrrdlliip did not lit there in the dignified chevalier he fuftained of an hereditary legiflator, but in the office, neither lets importantnor honourable, of an expounder of the law. In his review of the pre fent cafe, be remarked on the delay occafioned by the confinement of an honourable witnefs, whole errors excited grief, and whole misfortunes extorted compaffion. He (aid. the Plaintiffs were perfectly exonerated from the charge of nfory,which had been attempted to fopported again' them ; the whole lof this part of the caufe, therefore, depended upon Ibis Lordlhip's direction on a point of law. If when the bills were drawn, they were put into the hands of the Defendant without any oft:lions ftipulation ; if from thence they were delivered over to the Plain tiffs, upon the day of their acceptance, before any ufurious intercourfe, then the bills were not tainted, and his clients were entitled to recover. He admit ted, that if an infamous money broker fhould coin bills with Come thoughtkfi profligate, making an du• riot's contrail to the extent of a million of money, at the moment of their formation at the mint, al , t hough it fhould lower thehonours o f t his great trod -1 ing metropolis, and fend our merchantsinto beggary, las the law now ftuod, thole traitorous coiner. wool. lhe exonerated from the payment of one fulling of i the amount, and would rear their fronts among the princes of the earth. Mr. Garrow laid, it was a queflion of fait for the Jury to determine, whether, at the moment the bills were prepared. the ofury was perpetrated? and this would depend on the credit they attached to the evidence of Mr. Coventry. to whom he would attribute no defign to mifreprefent. In this enquiry the Jury would recollea. that it was not his firft tra nfailion vi i.h the Defendant; that his demands were tugent, 2111 that it was extremely ins-1 'probable, under dick: i is cumftances, he &mild at the l time of the formation of the bills ftipulate for the tender mercies of the Uf urer. The Learbed the faid, (111 the prefent occafion, however, b* the au- I don ufea in the pleadings , his right to a verditt was lefleblilhvi on the counts of the declaration. What lever might be the fate of this bill, for the goods deli veld, the Plaintiffs were entitled to recover. A long altercation here took place between th his e Counfel, which was afterwards renewed, while Lordfhip was fumming up the evidence to the Jury. After a dillinit and prottailed flatement an thatelli. m ony in this easag, MAIM tile law of the boas i. applicable to it. the Jury foond a verde& fur the Plaintiffs to the extent of the goods delivered. aol. CRIM. CON. °amuse 3. GIOIVIC CM MAIMS, VIM , . I. CAULCIILO, The Plaintiff is the fon of the late Sir William Chambers, areltiteo to the King, has a commiffion in his Majefly'a fervice, and was employed in the ex. pedition to Holland. The Defendant was alto a Catain in the rmy, is well known in the circles of gaiety and fafili a on, and as an amateur of th e dra matic art. The Plaintiff married one of the daughters of Ad miral I.erd Rodney, in the autumn of the year 1784. It was a match of the purell feniibility and affetlion, formed between two young perfons, the one eighteen and the other feventeen, and confummated after a rapid expedition to Gretna Green. On their return from this northern flight, the union received the fanc tiun of the parents on both fides, and this happy cou ple sere bored according to the holy rites of the Church of England, when Sir The William Chhisambe mar rs was prefent at the ceremony . iffne of t siege extended to none beautiful children ; eight of them were boys. For a long fueceffion of years, this early parti. , lity teemed to be confirmed and flrength ened. Such was theoyful lituation of thefe parties, u ntil a Mort time be fore they met the prefent De fendant at a ball at Huntingdon, in the neighbour hood of which town the Plaintiff refided. The fob request faits will be more fatisfaatifily Ci Haled from th particulars of the trial, than from any de tail we e could give from our knowledge of the cir- comflances. Mars. Ea seta ir, Gaartow, and S , were COUltra for the Multi" ; Meffrs. Da+ias, Glass, an Buaaotron, Inc the Defendant. Mr. Easaims, on the part of the former, diklofed the f.tls of the eafe. Ile raid, this was an aBion lacking a compenf.itifm, in dimity+. for the criminal intercourfe of the Defendant with the wife of the Plaintiff. The Lady was ezquifitely beautiful, per feCly accompliflicd, of molt fafcinating twitters ; and n otwithtlanding the numerous progeny which the had given, to become the me ornament of fociety,flie retained all the appearance Vernal lovelinefs. The Defendant is a man pokeffed of an elegant palm. of a fi T ahed *dikes, and endowed with thofe talent. and powers which Soda vigilant and infidioos advo cate in the female bofom. He faw, and he admired this lady at a dance given in the principal town of the county where fbe retied. mon melancholy it was that tbefe fentiments were not confined to bint. felt (he alto law, felt, and admired. and from that moment the felicity of her /inland wasfor ever de (frayed. The Plaintiff immediately obferved a 'Cud den change in her manners; on every little donsellic difpute, the threatened to leave her hufbancl, and the fond circle in which Ilse had. appeared ; and fu• tare events could alone explain to the aided hut band this grievous revalntioa. During this miferable interval. the Plaintiff difeovered a letter in her hand: urged by jealonfy, he attempted to feize it ; in con fequence of this fcuffie, the deferted the mention pf her bufband and her children ; but at , this • time he bad attained no knowl4ge of her criminality.— Soon after this fracas, he was. in his ofienfible cha ndler in the fervice, called upon to embark to join in the attack on Holland. It to happened, that the in difpofition of this officer did not admit of his remain ing in that humid climate, he therefore unexpected- ly returned to his houfe at Hartford, near Hunting. don, where his wife then was. .She appeared, on his 'arrival, extremely , agitated, and the next morn ing left the place, abandoning an infant, of only (even months old, wholly unprotetted. Mrs. Cotine, the fi ller of the Plaintiff, depofed to the marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Chambers, on the r ath of September, t 784. The Rev, John Walker gave teßitiony to the har mony and affeaion that ,prevailed in the family, in which he abed in the capacity of tutor. .4 Mrs Little was in the fituation of honfe-Veeper, and had alto the fopetintendance of .the children.— She firß eibl'erved a 'change in the deportment . of Mrs. Chambers in the year 1798, anck (he had Come time before obferved a difpofition to ffiat with feve ral Gentlemen ; but fhe noticed nothing very re markable until iSot, when Captain Caulfield had a lodging at Huntingdon, and was a frequent valtor to her mailer and mittrefs. Being interrogated if (he noticed any thing peculiarly familiar in the beha viour of Captain Caulfield and Mrs. Chambers, the laid they were accnilomed to fit on a fnpha together io the abfence of her hatband. After the departure of the Plaintiff for the Helder, the Captain was re ceived on a footing of much nearer intimacy ; he was accuftomed to be in the tannic late in the even ing, and early in the morning, and none of the fer- Tants knew when he went or when be returned, fo that fufpicions were entertained that he was an in mate all night in the family. The men-fervants were ufually fent to bed at this period at an early hour.— Mrs. Chambers had alto altered her plan in one par ticular; it was ufual with her to admit the children into her room, as Coon as they role, with the wit nefs. who attended them, but during the whole of this interval, they were excluded, and both the doors of her apartment were locked. Mary Smith remained in the fervice of the Lady two years, from about Chrißmas, Mar, to the fame Wirral in tiloa. Her minters then lived at Farn ham St. Martin's, near Bury, St. Edmund's. She thought Capt t h e aulfield was thetia lodger with her. From thenceemoved to Prince's-ltreet, Hann ver-fquare : thence to Fulham; afterwards to Mint- Patin. near Reigate h and again to Batteries; and in all thefe fituations the Defendant attended her, and feemed to continue a lodger, and an acquain tance in her family. end no illicit intercourfe was deteaed. Afterwards they went to Chertfey, nd there likewife they had two feparate beds and apa a rt. menu; but from her experience in her office of chamber-maid, what, ft om their previnus conduit, and the proximity of the rooms. (he flrongly furpea ed that both beds were regularly made, and con- Randy difordered ; and from other more minute cir enmllances, which it is neither delicate nor neceffary to explain. the had no doubt that the Defendant had criminal interconrie with her mitlrefs. Mr. DALLA3, for the Defendant, admitted, that if the cafe were proved, his client had alienated the at feai.,ns of this lovely feraph, retaining all the charms, wawa, at this hour, of virgin beauty, no damages could be too, !trim's, and no compenfation could be adequate to the injury filleted by the Plaintiff. How ever, the claim of Mr. Chambers in a Court of La w mull depend upon the merit of his pretenfions. The Learned Connie), after the evidence tha w had been UR adduced, would not, and could not, pretend that the adultery had not been proved; but whether the Plaintiff had any . 011 demand for damages mutt de pend nn the fans by which the defence would be fup ported. It was fingulat, that. though Mrs. Cotine, the filler of the Plaintiff, was brought hrward as a witnefs, not a tingle quedion was propofed to her by his Learned Friend, on the harmony foblilling be tween the Plaintiff and hi. wife, although it might be thought, from his repiefentation, that this conjugal union was a fort of matrimonial elyfium, which could alone be excteded by the joys of Paradife.— The happiness of this pair was to be proved by the uniupported evidence of a fingk clorneltic, E. Little, whole depofitions in feveral Tell:nits were abfurd and contradiaory. The lon of Sir William Chambers, and the daughter of my Lord Rodney muR panel's a regular end habitual intercourfe with thole who held a diainguiflied rank in the fa fisionable world, ant yet not one of their affociates had been prothiced to give te itimony to thole mutual ervieat mints which appear ed nely in the brief of his opponent. He Ibould make it appear, why thi. fort of evidence could not be fopplied ; be would produce to the Jury a relies of letters; he would prod uce a deed, fanttioned by all the formalities of tile I iw, which would expecte a fy Rem of brutality in the conduit of the Plaintiff; — after which he could be ' , nutted to no damages ; and it would equally excite the anonifhment and the coin pailion of the Court, or perhaps its contempt, that he should have prefonted to claim of the Office of his country what virtue and humanity alone have a right to require. Mr. Dallas then produced the letters to which he adverted. The hrtt was dated in Marini, in which the Plaintiff aCeiited to a awaiting ; (peaks of the terms on which it ie to be effeeed, and in treats her not to take one of the carriages with her. as it would cxpofe him to an affeliment of aol.a year. rhe next was dated the ad of June. wherein he im. Owes pardon for his pall salifconduet, intreats an onion, and lays he null be ever grateful if Ike will not refute his sopa. On the third letter, which is dated four days polletior, he befeeehes her to be re conciled to him, if net on his Account. at teat from her attachment to her children, from her refpra for her own dignity. and from every motive of policy and expedience. He was now going abrnad on a public and dangerwas duty t in hie abfence hetbould be per rally compoled and refired to every peril in the Cavern of his coontry,if the wouldrellore to him peace, . . . . • • .. ~. . . by extending her forgivenethi thane dilare threat which be had attend is an of ~.., • 'he adds, " With to rd to. the piitoli, :I, yon the mailed injury, and what I entered has . w)- der the momentary intiiience of harry and iatosica tion." • The Learned Counfel than proceeded m a deed of reconciliation, to which ,lohl and Jaaaci" ml bees, George Lord Rodney. John Rodney.and lin Mill:Atilt...FAT*. were parties... He (aid. that in this deed there was ap abfolute covenant,. that in cafeif difference* , The Mould. be, admitted M Apemtt:tgis time her Awn diferetion thould direal that .4001. in drefs and furoiture Thopld be,allowed.ber, with an a nnuity of two hondred pounds.... She wallthewlik to have the two :oat:gen. clUlthen Moil they WeMeiglit years old, under her care, and permilion le fee. the • other children at the hoof: of the Plaintiff whenever her maternal 'Wilms fliould be fo difpofed, 'rhit whole tenor of the defence wesdireaed to th ew the Plaintiff, by his own grofr conduel, had alienated the alio:lions bf his wife ; that the h.td,obtained teems of feparation with his own coneirrence, ,in cosh quence of his brutality ; and that thertifore, for any aft of . infidelity, however fueedsfully three. he cpeld, maintain no aftion for damages in a Court of fate. deed I • _ e and the letters having been waif by Mt. Bootle, they were read according to the Order of their dates, by the Clerk of the Court, by Which it appeared that the Plaintiff expreffedthe moll rig. neat contrition for his own errors, and not a fyilaa bit of dee fasallell , dikontent arifing from any past of the deportment of Mrs. Chambers. Mr. Es-sues then rote in reply, with Rrong marks Of indignation. The moil infamous reports had befit circulated by this Defendant' iti order to deter the Plaintiff from Peeking the retiree to which he wit entitled at the Bar of his eonntry. By the Mame tioa with which his Learned Friend was fu he was now made acquainted with the corrupt fountain from which they iffued. This profligate adelteret, repofing in the arms of thie beautiful andatatortunati woman, had prollituted the confidence• to which he . was admiued, had ranfacked the papers in her poker fion, in Order to convert the proofs. of the ardent af feaions of her hutband. into inftroments of deßrue tion • i the man over whom he triumphed, This, ow a thoufand oceafions, he had called the adulterer's cootie; if it were thasetintes the 4ace of fscoefa. is was always the path of infamy. It was objease‘ that not a tingle queltion was propofed on his fide to Mrs. Cosine, in evidence of the matrimonial hfppinefs thee Plaintiff fo long enjoyed. The Lady came into Court under the molt dittreffing perplexity; and it was not the wiQs of the Counfel for the Plaintiff to rotate her anxiety ; yet no Inch iasprelions km° to base ezifted in the brealt of his Learned Opp o sent. and be might have lifted the truth ilia had doubted the faa of this mutual felicity; but he knew the experialtent would injure the eaufe of his client. and shooflies he deified from this inquifitioo. It was carom.. dinary that he &mild complain of the deficient is. duftry of the Contitel for the Plaintiff in this par ticular. when in another inflanee immediately eon netted with it, he bad at lea% been equally (pan• ing ef his exertions. Mr. Chambers, the fon of that .Architee, fo lung patronized by his Sovereign. and who has rendered Masten' iTAIDOIIig by the mastith cent monuments of his genies : Ms wife. t a:X he L ter of an mutinous and Oast. lliebletaam. 1 beays@aeftreomtiftildfi,enathe,eidtjalyaiteo.:aonuc:onladalntbearettsad hrtecanicaondnociii:::weorarcenkforietnowilicenw:iyredlitt:Wierefetralifi.n. then Mr. Chambers had been guilty •of any maims duet ; if he had frequented gaming booths and MO? diets; if be had praftifed the vie and. the vices of I the fpendthrifi and the debauches, abundant teal. ' moray would have been afforded, of which his leer*- ed Friend might have *railed hinsfelf, in order to thew that the profligacy of the Plaintiff rendered him unworthy of the ateflion of his accomplifhed wife. But not a tittle of evidence had been adduced, not. , arid:Rending all the advantages with which the Counfcl were fupplie d ; they had contented them , (elves with allufions made by the Plaintiff. in the no• ble and generous fpirit of repentance, which itfelf argued he was incapable of the offences with which he was charged. A ['aerobic about a contemptible " flip of paper had been adverted to, mid a Rory I about an unloaded pined was blazoned of to far 1 1 port the feeble narrative. Sappiice. is the of inebriety, either from the died' of will14 118 41: 11 1; the more deadly poifon of jealolifyi he bad dose what had been reprefented ' • and was the , floe pie tore drawn by the midierly hand of the folditne ar tilt of our country to be forgotten ? and were the human patens never to be refpelted ? Litters to the _voice of the noble Moor; ia the exceth of his parson he exclaims — Oh monftroes! f wit tear her Herb !mi. hv.b" • Then driven altersataly by hope and fear— . 1 Dv tie world,—.—•--. I Web ay wire is bale& sad think the Is no: Ukiah that shoe set Jett, and think shoo set aa : rabies few; pciuL My name, flaw au -. free A. Dimes vgago.ls now bogrirtid and black • As muse own face. If there be cords or knives. Pair" or rimer felbeedge Chreems. I'll net endure D. Would I were ratishoV Stich were the feelings of a great sail genre:ooo mind under the dominion of this tormenting patient This demon had been driven from Hell to transfer its fires iotn the breaft of this viEtim. A lady of noble alliance is condoeted from tows to town. and espofed in a Rate of roftitutios to the ridicule ..of -.. fools, to the compalion of the wife. and to the coo tempt of all. A foldier returning from the field of battle to the embraces of tilt objeft of his early arse- • Cloth is rejeaed with difdain ; be is derived of that society which bad converted the days of trouble into a (taros of uninterrupted felicity, and for the loth be has (attained, he claims reparation from the boner and the jutlice of his country. When Lord Etats sos.ov a a was about totes up the evidence, one of the Jurors &fired to Kopek a queflion to the bookkeeper. Mrs. Little being cell' ed, he enquired if. before the istiesecy of the De. feudant with her insets, the obferved eel thing its confitient with mii:ii.ll love and harmony to fubfi* b • ...( -:n the Plaintiff and his wife ? The reply woes that flow had noticed nothing of the kind, szeeptieg the difpu:: regarding the letter. • ' Lord ELLSISCHLOVON (to the Jery).—" After this brilliant difplay o f talent and eloquence • it be. comes es to withdraw mirthless from the iallimece of the patron's, mod to inquire into the bias. as (o ber and redouble man. It keens to toe, the Geo. Erardeasy. / / • .., , IN • ' ~ I , - . . ? , , ' , o . . i* ' -,2 * ; i -- i , i 0 . 4 "I: . I , : s V t . V' e . 1, 1 : .,, 4 ‘ , ) '. - $ 1 -. II , : t , 6 ?• If e- G • ) ? I. ' , of , • 11- to A 6. et- A A- no- ref!' idt WO orT 4p- kept ram lose —L.— the de flu) atm tie, tel. ley, !• rano Jest Nub let s ified floor? L rhich al of Al by 49 with Clii the ruder Arun (hut red. e a:: Iran e after Is ad- r pi 0. fi ~,,1 thtLe each, gious >erred nrtg:. lhctsi. SCA' no , ze- ID •, failca erica. le Cl'