Star. — London, England, 1809-02-17 00:00:00

. • . . s. i . .. . • . •t6 ,w . ....) J . b• - • . y ( 7... 1 i r ..... . ~,,, . .. . r. .., • .., ..., .. ; . . •, . 1 / 4. C i t .,..... 4k , • , ; . : . . •. . . ' . . .111: P . -.- r : - -4• . ,t. 4, . : • - - ---7:71 , -K 5 1z 5i ...... „ 4• r !' ,• - / ri & . • - ...._,( r'.... \ . L. 4 1.. •• . . Nt7 ...... s : ,- _._ •._ . , .19 11 7 1 Fir:WV 4V6‘, :' • ••••• - r" . ~:' %~ F,77 1 [~-~~ • , ^ 44 "laialltel-WArk• 1.i•7/43.1!1.• ,~ . . . .; - ' r')111Elt 0844] 11VALLING-OFFICE, Fatruary IS, 1409. PR THE COM MISSIONERS for gICTUA LLING XIS A f,ifEsrrs xiivr, do hereby give Notice, v.. 1., or. Tuesday the 21st instant, they *lll be ready to rrcePre enders, in writing, (sealed up) end treat for Eight Hundred ou r; of New Pile, and for Two Hundred Quarters of New Clj,-se DIA Amber blatL;P; to be delivered one half thereof in sw oight and other half in a fortnight afterwarcis, into bis Ma y'; Vic:nailing stores at Deptford; and to be pa/A fot-by Bills e,i c with interest ninety days after date. he Conditions of the Contract may be seen at the Secretary's Om • • v, , cel ovill be had to an y Tender in which the price shall stet Ili isri ulsr -Toni) at length, or that shall mot be delivered ti the Board &pee :;:losi on the said Tuesday, the 21st instant, nor unless the pews y i, .12.1 a the Tender, or one Person en his' lushaif,'attems4, to goirtver Om al:ed for. pURSIJANT to a Detretal Order of the High C o x of Chancery, made in a Cause, wherein Sir James m urr3 y Pulteney, Bart. and others are Plaintiffs, and Tetirnas 140 , mer ,ler, Evi. and others DefenAants, all Persons claiming "be incumbrances under a certain Deed, bearing date the 24th 'T,.enber,l726, made between Richard Brinsley Sheridan Esq. ' cr the ore part, and John Rose Drew and Hugh Harnniersley, of 'she other part, in the Pleadings et the said Cause men for,hwith ithto come lit and prwie their Debts before jogs 00 , Esq• one of the Masters of the said Coast, at his Clamber; in Southanapton-Buildings, Chancery-lane, London, or in derauh t;tereof, tbey will be excluded the benefit of the said Decretal Order. --January 24, 1809. TONTINE INN AND POST-HOU6E, SHEFFIELD. TON BATTY respectfully informs the No bilit y , J Gentry, C•rnmercial Gentlemen, and Public in general, that wing taken the above Inn, he hopes, by assiduity and attention, , l iocrit their patronage and support.—Sheffield, Jan. 27, 1809. IMI3ER. TO BE SOLD, 160 Acres of very fine OAK INIBER. mixed with some very valuable ASH and • , all of above 100 years growth. It is situated within ;gem of Clonmell, and twenty-one of Limerick, in the - 2 4 ,1cr0f Ireland, from each of w which Towns there the sd of is water rxt i -e —Proposals (post paid) ill be received until March, by Wm. Roper, Esq. 34, Narth. Great George's-street, and furtl , ..v particulars may be known, by application to tis John Neslat, No. 16, Tok.--i'vsuse-Y arch, Loneon. ESTATES IN THE COUNTY OF DONEGALL, TO BE PERE:' :I)TORILY RE-SOLD, Or VESDAY, the 22d day of February instant, at eleven e'rin-k in the forenoon, with the approbation of Saattitt ComtioN Cox, FAq. one of the Masters of the Court of- C::...r.erry in England, at tue Public Sale Room of the said Cot:r;, .in Soutlompton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, Ic 5::7.nt to several Orders of the said Court made in Causes thz intituled " Downes e.Thomae," and "Downes rh,,mas." ER PAIN Lands; I-Teredirament, and Premises, :oinprfsed in the Mincrs of Boneranagh.and Elogb, ‘ in the Cav:y Donegall, in the K ngdom of Ireland, part of the Estates ef :i:e Marquis of Dooegati, and cootainiilg ih the While 23,196 t.'res and 17 Peschee. or thereabouts ,' for an unexpire d Term of I CC Years: subject - to the several valid Leases subsis'ing - on said Estates, in the several Lots, and subject to the Condi s:nd in the printed PrticUlars which ochre issued for eze Sale of the same Estates on the:l9th of Novenfo2r, t eon, St ,Scli Sale has been postponed till the 21evitLay of February insi. Particolais may be had (gratis) at the said Master's - Clambers, inSouthampton-buildings aforesaid; of Messrs. Ald- nine and y _Smith, Solicitors, ; of Me pre tdr:ll:7 and Lowe Solicitors , 14r..er-Tetpte; of Mr. Whttten; Sqiicit,r, (heat ;ames-sticet Bedford-row ;of Me: 'Jaques, Land :inn' yor , Hatton-Oxide; ; andlnstr:land of Alf. William Eviess4 , :, Sotisltot, Stepben'i-Green, D.AUlin. _ ALDRIDGE and COLLEY S MITH, Plaintiff 'S Solicitors,. I,incolti's Tons • _ - . MISS HILL'S NPVE I * ,. • This day was published, Itt ThreeNolutilei, Price 15s. in beards, THE FO WEST OF COMAINA-; a NOVEL. Containing Sketches of PORTUGAL SPAIN t and psr: rf FRANCE. Printed for liten.ian Pnit.t.trs, No. 6, Bridge-Meet, Black friars, London. • GRANO LOTTERY. FREE GIFT of ONE THOUSAND *HOLE TICKETS . the l'irft Day, Numbe'rs as follow: ;1,061 „, t - to 4,:i0l s,nat .. .. .. to c.,,3e1 . ..... . ..... .. ... to -,;,0t 8,301 .. ......... ~..... An ..... . tt,Boo 4, , •01 10,60 I • 1; ,Ortl. :2,5(.1 A:3:i i•lti:F. CIIT of.EIVE HUNDRED IVH4iili TiCKETS to the iirst-drawn above £l5, the Second Day, Numbers as follow : :',not 14„cy. 3/01 ••;, - -11 1 ; , 001 . so '.::•. z'nve F.elttis may gain Vie whole of the following. CAPITAL PRIZES: of - l,OOO 10,000 10 .. . . of : •.. .. •~ Begins APRIL I'.!th, 1 0 /309.. .1 r?n;equLtice of the above Gifts of 1,500 Tickets, there are only 13,100 for Sale. l'"1;e!s and Shares are selling at all the licensed Offices. :t: Ni): FIVE HUNDRED S nvri, LOTTER' 1 TICKETS, As a Vail% GIFT in the present LOTTERY . , Driivirg on WEDNESD.‘Y, 12th of APRtI.. [c KETs and s HARES are now selling in the :.coed `zate Lottery, the Scheme consists of 20,rn4 'Tickets s: h the aldt; ional FREE GIFT' of tbe present Contractors (.0 Whole l'.ckets, for the first-drawn Prize, either whole that i+ drawn on the First Day above' £l6, in addi t•r,, the Prize :hat it will otherwise .be entitled to—likewise Tickei3, i!, iltell . .anner, for the Second Day of Drawing, ~ ::g the said Scheme—therefore an early pur -0.:.e is recommended by S'R JA111:S BRANSCOMB and Co. • ..( of the Lucky Lottery Offices, No. it, Holborn; 1 ,0 . I No. 38, Ir.ay.narlset, Piccadilly ; and at No. 269, 3 " •'!', where• No. 7,081, the fortunate nornher entitled to the Pt . :ze of .100 1. - Thok •Ficliets on the First Day . of Dravring rs: '.:4te Lottery, was sold in one Half, one Quarter, one "tr.z. two Sixteenths ; and where likewise the following in the 'rwo last Years' Lotteries were sold in 631 ft • chtitied to '140,000, and the only Prize of drat Amount ev'r Shared. 14,711 .. Q 3,2.54; ... ,e20,c00 6,145 ... £20,000 —+ • . I Psl 2.0,000 112,909 .• • • 1 0 , 000 ;..02 , 2 N 0.577 ... 20,000 1 . 18,783 ... 10,000, :0 With 20 Prirea of £5,000 and £l,OOO, 14 `iden z rtat Pt t-,portion of .£5OO, .€4OO, &e. &e.; and sun.r tri"-Iller Capitals in former Lotteries, amounting to vpwards of ONP MILLION STERLING. ". - • - And the fortunate Adventurers paid on Demos& FRIDAY,-FEBRUARY 17, 18th PARLIAMENTARY PAOCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORIiS,TItLJRSDAY, FEB. it Basset's Divorce was read a third time, and passed. The Proceedings relative to the Banbury Peerage were re sumed, end ordered to be continued on Thursday nest. The House, in a Committee offriVileges, mode some amine': meats respeetite further progress of the Roxburgh ease. The Militia Enlistment Bill, Malt Duty Bill, Equity Debtnrs' Bill, and Ord Eteheiluer BM Bills, were received frcnn the Com- mons, s i gid read a first time. The Mike of GLOUCESTER presented a petition from cert al Debtors in the King's Bench, praying for relief. it was referred to a Committee on the Laws of Debtor and Creditor. CAMPAIGN IN SPAIN AND PORTUGAL. Lord DARNLEY then called their Lordships' at tention to the subject of the late Campaign in Spain and Portugal. Impressed, as he was, with a deep sense of the inisconduct r of Ministers, and recollecting that they pmfesied a disposition to put the House in' possession of every information that might be requi site to enable Parliament and the country to decide upon their measures, he, felt it his duty to move for , several Returns, calculated to attain that obj ect. He understood that the Spanish Juntas parti cularly soli cited the assistance of a respectable body of cavalry. This was precisely that description of force which we could have best spared, es our cavalry establishment greatly exceeded what could at any time be requisite for the purposes of internal defence. Btit . among the various features of the misconduct of . Ministers, one of the most striking was their tardiness in complying with the request of the'Spaniards, and the very limited extent to which it was at last gratified. The official dispatches bore testimony to tile - injurious consequen ces of a deficiency of cavalry in the battle ofVimiera. He concluded with moving for k return of the effec tive Cavalry in Great Britain on the let of July 1 - 808, a return of the Cavalry engaged in the battle of Vi, miera, and a return of the total of the British Cavalry in Spain, at the moment of the junction of the several divisions of the t under Sir John MeOre. • • - The Earl of I rt . ) .NERPC/014 assuted . the Noble Lord and the House, that Ministers felt not the least wish to oppose the motion just made. Onthe contrary, it had their hearty concurrence. He only wished to amend the motion, - so as to include a return of the various arrivals of cavalry in Portugal-subsequent to the battle of Vimiera, andaip to the time of Sir John Moore's march to Spain. With the view of still fur aher promoting the purpose of fair and impartial en quiry into the conduct of Velisters, he should move for additional Papers as soon as the Noble Lord's mo tion was disposed of. Lord DARNLEY had nom* ction to the amend ment proposed by the Noble Secretary, provided the date of the variotis arrivals of cavalry in Portugal were added: This suggestion being acceded to, the rnotion,was pat and agreed to. The Earl of LIVERPOOL then said, that in or der to explain, in the most ample manner, the line of -conduct adopted. by Ministers in reference to Spain and Portugal, he felt it necessary to move for copies', of the instructions sent to our Commanders in those countries, and the communica ions from them to Mini sters, with the exception of such parts as it might be in ....- ju • rious to the public service topublish. He wished Noble Lords to understand,-that the passages he alluded to were such as related to services still depending. As to services completed, there was no intention of with holding any documents that, in the slightest degree, bore upon the discussion of their merits. All that he requested was, that nothing should be done to pre judge the question of What,had been the conduct of Ministers: and that whatever proceeding was adopted after the papers were laid on the table, should be such as to afford them a fair opportunity of explaining every part of their conduct; and, this course being pursued, they felt not the least apprehension in sub mitting to the candid decision of the House. The instructions to Sir Thomas Dyer, and his communi cations to Sir Arthur . Wellesley, would, he thought, be found in the papers relative to the Convention of Cintra already moved for ; if not, they might be cal led for on a future day. In answer to a qaestion across the table from Lord Darnley, his• Lordship said, that it was an admitted_fact, 'that the Junta of Oviedo had made an application of the nature previ ously alluded to by. the Noble Lord,, and that Sir Thomas ,Dyer communicated the same to Sir Arthur Wellesley. . The Duke of NORFOLK wished, to know whe ther measures had been taken to prevent the French and Spanish fleets in Cadiz halbour from falling into the hands of the enemy. We had now here aa Am bassador from Spain, who held a high official situa. tion in that country : and one of the most important points to be arranged with him, was, in his concep tion, that of securtugahose fieets,• by stipulating that they should be sent to Buenos Ayres, Minorca, or any other pace of safety. When he looked to the ra pidity of operation:that characterised the man who was at the head of the French armies, he was not with out apprehensions on this subject. - His Grace further expressed his hopes that Ministers, whatever assistance they might continue to give the Spaniards, in money and supplies, would not rashly put to hazard any considerable portionrlf our military force. No answer was given to the Noble Duke, and the motion of Lord LIVERPOOL was put and agreed to.— Adjourned. •• - HOUSE OF COMMONS. A Member was sworn in.and took his seat. On the motion of Lord FOLKSTONE, Mr. Greenwood, Co lonel Taylor, and Mr. Williams, were ordered to attend before Y e Committee of Inquiry respecting the conduct of the Duke of York ; as were Mr. and Mrs. Corri, on the motion of Sir James HALL. A Message was brought ffom the Lords, with Mr. Gregson' s Divorce Bill, passe& by diet'. Lordships, deli rbt t h e concurrence of the House thereto . Read the ant time.. a dd arderedfor the second reading. • . . • • Oa the motion of SirARTHUR VirELI.ESLEY the House re solved Inns a Committee on the Irish Militia Acts Consolidation Bill. It - was reported, ordered to be printed; and taken into fur ther avissiskrarion4hls I day month. • . sir A.RTHUIL WELLE,SLEY moved the sneer of the day for seqd readiutpf the Irish Militia I:4distment Bill:. = , Lille e t o inagt ODELL N... eeepellirees Ids wig UM 's *clatiit should a.... ,„ .. 4 • - .v 3 41- - - be inserted in this bill, foi allowing the malt 'bounty to recruits fot the Mil'tia in Ireland as in England. Vointiteers Weee, he said, annually allowed to be transferred from the MA militia re &Mott to the line ; and - the Consequence was, those regiments were Sery defective of their ordinal force, an 4 the bounty of re cruits considerably raised A penalty. of sol.per man was alto imposed upon every parish defective in raising the quota bi a g ives day ; and he feared. that if the same bounty were not al -1 Arndt° the perishes in Ireland as to those in Eargland, to aid in raimini Slr AR th ;* lnen litht in W ucll F.L cU LES seon i t . ell EY t .t w r id uld unotiw agree. Willi the lion. therenoincteashefoota rnhrgecatteirloititni:,:dtinhatirenweeileheemiesisa,netwlthheedretpo:::: so high a bounty as Gentlemith, p t to th l ey lsetio wire ownpuas to rab b o e ni b ea ad oeuve o ry n . , t d ii n gr n tlernsn, besides, did not seem to bear in his ri.cullection, that the bounty of ten guineas was not given in England in aid of the ge neral recruiting of the militia regiments, but to the balloted mien, to enable them to procure substitutes ; and that in Ireland thane of the casualties in the, militia, regiments were fWed up by, ballot, neither did the expence of raising recruits to fi ll up the place of 1 the volunteers in !reland fall on the county, but was paid out of I the Treasury. In another bill which he meant to bring forward on this subject, it was his intention to insert a clause for enah- ling the I.c.rd Lieutenant of inland to arleance from the treasury, .at his discretion, rates otimmaty as hi t h as ten guineas, if neces sary, in aid of the balloted men, to Lail substitutes. On tkesuggestion of Colonel C. H. HUITHINSON, the Chan cellor of the Exchequer areedro postpone till Monday next, the tecondreading of the Corn Distillery Prohibition Bill. THE DUKE. OF YORK. Lord FOLKSTONE moved, that Mr. Chapman, first Clerk in Lord Castlereagh's Office, do attend the Committee ; and that the Right Honourable Charles Long be requested to attend in his place in that House to-day.-- Ordered. Lord FOLKSTONE moved the order of the day for the House to resolve into a Committee on the in quiry respecting the conduct of his Royal Highness the Commander in Chief. The House resolved accordingly, ' Lord HENRY PETTY stated, that as the name of Tindal had been mentioned in that . House in Maltby's examination respecting negociations for places, and as a most respectable Gefitlentan of that name, a Solicitor in Lincoln's Inn-Fields, had been apprehensiire that the public might imagine him to be the individual alluded to, he took this opportunity of removing any impression of thal nature, by stating that he had received a letter from Mr. TYNDALE, of' Lincoln's-Inn-fitlds, expressive of his alarm lest his name should be confounded with that of a man with whom he had nn intercdurse, for connection whattiver, and that be was ready and desirous to verify the fact at The bar, - The CHANCELLOR. of the EXCHEQUER said, he saw no danger of mistaking the respectable character alluded to for the other person, who it was stated lived at Chelsea. Mr. BAN KES said, he understood the person of the name of Tindal, who was connected with Maltby, wasAtot now forthcoming. He'had been given to understand, however, that he had been examined this day as a witness on the Committee for enquiring into East-India patronage. Lcrd FOLKESTONE now rose, and said, that, before he proceeded to call in the witnesses, it might be deemed convenient to put the Committee in pos ses• i m of the particular subject to which he meant to examine the first witness, Mr. Duff, the Solicitor, who attendel in consequence of the order of the House yesterday, with some papers he had to produce._ Those papers, he undetitood,:came into the hands of Mr. Duff, in the year 1801, in consequence of his being S )licitor to the Statute of Bankruptcy, against a man named Robert Kermet, who had formerly been an upholsterer in Bond-street, and afterwards lived in Lincoln's-Inn-fields, in the profession of a I curer of the tooth-ache. A proposition was set on fuot by his Royal Highness the Duke of York to raise fir his use a sum of £ 70,000 or £ BO,OOO by way of anwiity, and this Mr. Kennet undertook to forward \ the views of his Royal Highness, in consideration of provision being made for him by a respectable situa tion under Government ; and upon the success of this undertaking, was to depend the success of the nego tiation for the loan. Accordingly, application was made by his- Royal Highness to Mr. Pitt, to Earl Camden, and others, to procure Mr. Kennet a situa tion at home or abroad, and particularly one which happened just then to be vacant in the West Indies. A Secretary to the Duke of York acknowledged the receipt of Mr. Kennet's letter, proposing the terms of this negociation, the receipt of which he acknowledges in another letter, but in this he expressed no disap probation of Mr. Kennet's proposal ; and k would ap pear upon the face of the letter, that the success of the Duke of York, in obtaining the situation, would depend upon the loan.' liesliould'adduce the letters before the Committee, and particularly that of Colo nel Taylor, to which he alluded. He then moved that Mr. Duff be called to the Bar. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER' rose. He did not mean, he said, to oppose the mo tion of the Noble Lord ; but at the same time it did not appear-to him that the evidence, or the papers now pi - Toted to be'produced, had any connection with the subject, respecting which the Committee were instructed to inquire, namely, the conduct of his Royal Highness in his capacity of Commander in Chief. They had no relevancy whatever to the ma nceuvres of Mrs. Clarke, or the stories with them con nected, nor any relation to military business. How ever, he had no wish that any paper should be with held that in any degree might throw light upon the general cause ; and he therefore abstaine d from an y res i s tance of t he Noble Lord's motion, rather from a wish not to be thought desirous of stifling any infor mation respecting the whole subject in agitation, than frort any relevancy the m otion had to the question before the Committee. - Lord FOLKESTONE could not exactly under stand the Right Hon. Gentleman's meaning by his phrase—the manoeuvre s of Mrs. Clarke ; but if the suggestion he (the Noble Lord) had offered to the House last night, had been adopted, namely, an ad ditional instruction to the Committee to enlarge their inquiry into the general conduct of the Duke of York the p: p.n.s now moved for would be" h in ig l i th y er rei re e s v p a e u ct t. s, .. \ ~~ • [PEACE S n‹ , -P C • Mr.. Dur, called to the bar, and examined by Lord Otati-roxe: Q. What is ynd dame ? A: Archibald Duff.—:- Q. What is your sittietion ?A. Solicitor.--Q. DO you know Robert Kennet A.. Yes, I was Solicitor to a Commission- of Bankruptcy against him.--Q. What time did the Commission take place ? A: Some time in 1003.—Q: In consequence of his sknation, did certain paper* of his come into your possession ? A. In consequence of the 'Commission, the Bankrupt's . papers were seized, and certain le;tters came into my possession.r—Q. In your -opinion, do they relate to this enqtiiry I A. Ido not knO*. produce them: The papers were prodticed. Q. , •Vs'hin did thOse papers come into.your posses. slon ? A. I cannot precisely ascertain. It was sonie time about the latter end of 1805; or the•beginning of 1806.—Q. Have they been. ever since in your pos session ? A. They have.—Q. Are these' all the pa pers ?A: They are all which had any thing to do - with the Duke of .York.—Q. Did you at any time state that there was another.-paper in your possession, , which you could not readily lay your hand on ?. A. I did state so last night to Lord Folkestone ; but day I stated to the Noble Lord, that I was inclined ' to think, from a distant recollection of reading one of the bankrupt's letters, now in the hands of this Gentle Man (the short-hand writer), but I since find that I had no such letter.—Q. Do you mean that no such paper was in existence ? A. No such paper. Q. Are you acquainted with the hand-writing of Ro. bert Kennet ? A: Perfectly well: . Here Lord FOLKESTONE referred the witness . to the several letters produced by him, and num-. bered, 2, 12, 14, 17, 18, all of which he proved to be the hand-writ - mg of Kennett, .except enclosure in No. 17: tßy Mr. 144 VAMITTAttiI Do you mean to say the letter •to which you alluded just now, was never in existence ? • The witness repeated his answer to Lord Folke stone, on a. similar question: Q. In what business was Kennett ? A. He had been an upholder, iii Bond-street ; but at thetime of • his bankruptcy, to which I was Solicitor, he lived in Lincoln's Inn-fields, and cured, or •pretended to cure, the tooth-ache by a secret process.—Q. Did he obtain his certificate ? A: He did. Q. (By Lord Fames-rose.) Did be ,pass his last examination ? A. He did, after. a vast number of meetings and delays.—Q. 'What is become of Ken , • nett now ? A. Ido not know. I saw him about a month ago.—Q. Do you know any thing particular which occurred to him at the time of his bankruptcy? A. I do ; but I wish the question to -be put more particularly, and not to answer generally. —Q. Was he not put in the pillory ? A. He was, on the di rection of the Lord Chancellor, prosecuted by the . Attorney-General, for a conspiracy to defraud. hit creditors : he was convicted, and sentenced to the pillory.—Q. Had he been a bankrupt before S A, He was, about two years before.—Q. State the dates • of the bankruptcies ? A. I can't, with precision.— The second was in 1803 ; the first, I think, was in the month of January, 1801 ! Witness withdrew. . . . • . Lord FOLKESTONE moved that Colonel Tay lor be called to the Bar. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he apprehended Colonel Taylor had scarcely time to be in attendance since the order to summon him was made. He himself had received a note from the Noble Lord this morning, intimating his inten tion to move for Colonel Taylor's attendance, and an express had been, in consequence, dispatched for him to Windsor, which could not reach him time enough - to procure his attendance sooner than seven or e.;ot - o'clock this evening. Lord FOLKESTONE said, his object was .only to prove the hand-writing of Colonel Taylor in. some of the letters now produced, which perhaps,. the Right Hon. Gentleman himself, or some other. Ho nourable Member present, might do. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he had never seen Colonel Taylor write, butte thought all doubts on the. point might be readily ob viated.by some Member present. . An Honohrable Member, Mr. TAYLOR, said he could answer the Noble Lord's questions on the point. The letters marked 8,9, 10, 13, and 20, were shewn t 6 him successively, all of which he stated to be the hand-writing of Colonel Taylor, except 13 and 20, but a note in the Colonel's hand was inclosed in these letters. Mr: DUFF was then called, and No. 13 being shewn to him, he said, he did not think it was Kennett's hand. No. 4, 5, 9, and 19, were then shewn to Mr. ADAM, who acknowledged theirs to be his owihand writing, except No. 9, which he said was written by his direction. Nos. 11 and 15 were ihen shewn to Mr. V. Lot;G, who admitted the letter to be.his own hand-writing ; but said the former purported to bea copy. , Lord FOLKESTONE stiggest'ea the. propriety of the letters•which 1 ai been proved being now read ; No. 1 was a letter of Kennett's to Colonel Taylor, offering a loan to the amount of £70,000, and stating the terms on which it was te. be . conducted. I.IEUTENANT-COLOMEL TAYLOR TO MR. KIINNtT.• " Lieutenant-Colonel Taylor presbits 'compliments ' to Mr. Kennet, and is requested by his Royal Highness the Duke of York to desire hi will call on Mr. Adam, Lincoln's-inn-Gelds, on Wednesday next."—(Witlsout date.) MIL ADAM TO MA. IttNNIT. " Mr. Adam Is sorry that his business clseWbere detained tiirr', yesterday, so as to prevcnt his meeting Mr. Kennet, according to appointment He would be glad to see Mr. K. this asbming, eleven o'clock. • ". Lincoln's-inn-fields, August 32." Tat SAKI TO :rat sasta. " • Mr. Adam presents compliments to Mr. Kennet, and iejshei to see him -on Tuesday evening; before which time he cannot be In town.,-Lincoln's-ina4lelds, Thursday.' LIZOTSIKANT•COLOILL TAYLOR. TO MR. " I atutelonsl Taylor priscnts his ecenplireaots. to, Mr. Robert Kennat; ma bets to acquaint him that the Doke of Turk . -