Star. — London, England, 1819-06-15 00:00:00

~ froekthe 'frhe s warks in which the children were em ployed were not injurious to their healths. Nor was the beat of the atmosphere in those manufactories at all prejudicial to them. This result appeared from the evidence of the most enlightened professional men, who were examined upon the subject, or who had given in reporti upon oath. In illustration of these positions, his Lordship went largely into a re view of the evidence. It was evident from what ap peared, that the children employed in those manu factories lived to a greater age than others, and he must think it was preferable to employ them in such works, to turning them out to starve. Neither did such work obstruct their growth. The Militia of Lancashire were in general stouter and taller men than those of other counties where no such manufac tories existed. In many other trades children were as insalubriously employed. Why should all these be overlooked, and on.: branch alone attended to ? Let not a particular or limited enactment be brought forward, but let a general comprehensive measure be introduced, extending its beneficial regulations to every branch of manufacture known to require it.— In-the present case he thought no very serious evils existed. The Bill, if passed, would at best be nuga tory, but more probably pernicious. He should therefore move, that the Bill be committed for that day three months." The question being called for, a division took place, when there appeared—For going into a Committee, 27-,-Against it, 6—Majority 21. On the re-admission of strangers, their Lordships were in a Committee on the Bill ; when a few Amendments were proposed and agreed to, and the Report ordered to be received on Wednesday.—Ad journed till To-morrow. -r :; a. r, , HOUSE OF COMMONS. At a quarter past three o'clock the House were summoned to the Peers, to hear the Royal Assent given by Commission to several Bills (for which see the Lords). Mr. Attxtrr, from the Court of Exchequer, presented an Account of the Emolument of the Remembrancer of the Ex chequer.—Laid on the table. The Report of the Woollen Cloth Stamping Bill was received. Sir W. LEMAN presented a Petition from Falmouth against the Foreign Enlistment Mi.—Laid on the table'. A Petition was presented from Grantham, against the Duty on llalt.—Laid ou the table. A Petition was presented from the Burgesses of Perth against the Foreign Enlistment MlL—Laid on the tables Lord W. BENTINCK presented a Petition from Notting ham, praying that the stock in hand might not be affected by the new duty npn Malt.—Laid on the table. Mr. HUTCHINSON presented a Petition from certain In dividuals of the City of Cork, against the Cork Harbour Bill.— Laid on the table. - SirJ. JACKSON, in presenting the Report of the Committee appointed to consider whether the Plague was an infectious dis order, stated, that be differed from the opinion of the Commit tee, which was expressed in the affirmative. lie quoted the opinions of Dr. Macleod and Dr. Mitchell, in support of his own. Dr. Macleod considered that even if a large premium were offered, the Plague could not be imported into England— ("l It would expire a natural death. It bad been proved in seidence,:that the Turks constantly bought the clothes of persons dying of the plague, and wore them immediately, without being in the least affected. He wished also to impress upon the House the fact, that for upwards of 100 years no La zaretto had been seized with the plague, notwithstanding the number of ships which performed quarantine with that disorder on board. The regulations of those places were very inconve nient, for when a ship had been kept several days, if another arrived from the Levant. the former lost the advantage of its priority, and was obliged to remain until the quarantine of the latter bail been accomplished. He hojsed some alteration might be adopted to remove that inconvenience. . Mr. MORRITT adduced many instances to prove that the Plague was contagious, and he wished the House would hear in mind that the Report had met with the unanimous concurrence of all the Members of the Committee, with the exception of its Chairman. Sir ISAAC COFFIN objected to making any alteration in the Quarantine Laws, whether the Plague was contagious or not, as they had proved most beneficial. After a few words from Sir J. JACXSON, the Report way laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. Mr. DICKENSON then presented a Petition from the town. of Shepton Mallet, praying that some steps be taken for the more effectual Recovery of Small Debts.—Laid on the table. Mr. CURWEN moved the recommitment of the Wrexham Inclosure Bill. After a short discussion, in which Mr. WYNN, Mr. Alderman Voisin, Colonel Wotan, and Mr. Waorrasaav participated, the motion was negatived without a division. Mr. HUTCHINSON presented several Petitions from the Registrar and other Officers of the High Court of Chancery in Ireland, praying for remuneration in the event of the Bill for regulating the Fees of that Court being passed into a Law.—Or deeed to lie on the table. Mr. GOOCH presented a Petition from the Farmers and Dealers attending Ipswich Corn Market, praying that no addi tional Duty might be bid on Mak—Ordered to lie on the table. Lord MILTON presented a Petition from the Protestant Dissentersof Dewsbury, praying for an Alteration of the Mar riage Act.—Ordeted to lie on the table. ItIITION aC4 &NMT TUC Tax OW WOOL. Mr. DICKENSON presented a Petition from Froome, in the County of Somerset, against the new Duty on Wool. On the motion that the Petition be brought up, The SPEAKER observed, that he believed the Bill for im posing the Duty against which the Petitioners played wa; in the I louse, and consequently that it wculd be a violation of the rules of the House to receive any Petition against it. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER also thought, that to receive the Petition in the present stage of the 11111, would be to infringe the privileges of the I louse. Lord MILTON observed, that the question was, whether the Bill alluded to, and the other Bills of the same description, were for the supplies of the year ? lde thought they were not so. They were not to furnish the supplies of the year, but to support a Sinking Fund for the reduction of the National Debt. Now it appeared to him, that not being tilts for fbrnishing the Supplies of the year, the House ought not to claw its doors against Petitions which might be presented against them. This was a Parliamentary distinction, which, he believed, had been recognised more than once. The SPEAKER observed, that he believed all Resolutions agreed to in a Committee of Ways and Means were, without distinction, considered to be fur the supplies of the year. He was not aware of the practicability of making any distinction on the subject. Lord MILTON, in explanation, stated, that it was in the knowledge of the House of Commons, that the Bills in question were founded on Resolutions originally agreed to in a Corn-,, mittee of the whole House, but not in the Committee of Ways and Means ; and that it was specifically stated In those Reso lutions, that it was expedient to make an addition to the Sink ing Fund. Mr. S. WORTLEY said, that be had two Petitions on the subject, both representing the ruinous effects of the proposed Tax. As It seemed not to be the disposition of the House to r e c eive these Petitions, be gave notice, that when the Consoli dation Bill went into the Committee, he would take the sense of the House on that proposition which respected the proposed increase in the Ditty on Foreign Wool. Lord LASCELLES, in consequence, asked the Right Ho nourable Chancellor of the Exchequer, when he meant to pro- pose that the Consolilliwion Bill ahould be committed ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER replied, on Monday. Lord LASCELLES declared, thatshould c i ertanly join In opposition to a measure, which di/unte he sh sted to be of he most injutioup nature, imposing, as it did, a duty on the raw mate- , rial otamanufactont, which, although be should at all times ob ject 0 1 16 being taxed, was, at the present moment, p e c u liarly ineapileid of swinining any increased ptessure. • Ah.CALCRAFT amended that the proposed Duty formed service o. toped the Petitions would be recei44, or that his No.. would take the sense of the HoSse on the subject. Mr. ROBINSON maintained that the oew Duties stood ex actly on the same ground as former ones, part of which was ap plied to the Sinking Fund. Mr. LUSHINGTON followed on the same side, after which, Mr. DICKENSON consented to wiihdraw the Petition. FOREIGN WOOL. Lord MILTON held two Petitions, one from Wake field and the other from Dewsbury, against the addi-, tional duty um , . Wool. Objections had been started against the receipt of such petitions ; but he con ceived that there were precedents to prove their ad missibility, even after a Tax Bill had proceeded far ther than the present. He found on the Journals of the House, that in the year 1733, when the famous question of the Excise had come before Parliament, a Petition from the City of London had been pre sented on the 10th of April by the Sheriff, although the Bill imposing the new duties had been read for the first time in the House. The Petitioners prayed to be heard by Counsel at the Bar on the second reading of the Bill. A motion was made that the Petition should lie on the table. On this a debate arose, and the result was, that the Petition was or dered to lie on the table, but that the Pet i t ioners should not be heard by Counsel on the second read ing, the latter part having been put to the vote, and lost by a majority of 214 to 197. It was impossible to find a case more in point than the present. The Bill was in the House, and the limit for receiving Petitions seemed to have been extended and fixed to the second reading of such measure. He quoted several precedents to shew that the Petitions might at least be read to the House, even if they were not received. He then presented the first Petition, which was from the traders and manufacturers of Wake field, against the duty upon Foreign Wool, and stated that the Merchants who expected large quan tities of coarse Wool from Russia, had, in consequence of the proposed duty, written to their correspondents to have it landed at Antwerp instead of this country. Mr. HUSKISSON contended that the case men tioned by the Noble Lord did not apply to the pre sent question, as the Bill against which the Petition had been received was one tending to introduce new regulations into the Excise, and not to raise an ad ditional revenue. He thought that unless the House felt disposed to open a new and a very inconvenient course, the present l'etition could not be received. Mr. P.MOORE maintained that thecountry had had no opportunity to consider the merits of the tax now proposed. The House itself was scarcely acquainted with the subject. If Petitions against taxes were not to be received, then let taxes be proposed at an early part of the Session, when there would be abundant time for their consideration.. Mr. BROUGHAM contended, that the Petition mentioned by his Noble Friend, was almost the same as the present. It had been received in consequence of a strict examination of the Journals of the House, which had afforded numerous precedents for the course which had been adopted. Lord CASTLEREAGH wished the House to abide by the general rule which had hitherto been observed. It Petitions were brought up, read, and then rejected, that mode would certainly be both unfair and inconvenient, because it would then ap pear that it was their prayer which was objected to. NVhen it was known, on the contrary, that Petitions could not be received against a Tax Bill when once brought in, their rejection could not be productive of disappointment to the country. He did not mean, however, to say that Honourable Members might not make motions and state the substance of Petitions to the House, although they could not be received. Mr. STUART WORTLEY read a note from Mr. Ilatsall's book, which stated that the Petition to which the Honourabie and Learned Gentleman (Mr. Brougham) had alluded, had only been received be cau.:e it had been presented by the Sheriff of the city of London, and not by a Member, and out of respect to that City. After a few words from Mr. BROUGHAM, the mo tion was negatived without a division. TIMES NEWSPAPER. Mr. CANNING rose and spoke to the following , effect: " Before the House proceed to the other bu siness of the day, it is my painful duty, on this occa sion, to bring before this House the consideration of an affair in which the privil2ges of the house are involved, and in which, in more respects than one, I feel myself personally concerned. There is no man . in the House more deeply sensible than I am of the expediency and propriety of providing, whether byi some established and authorized mode, if that should be deemed the proper course, or by connivance, as is the case at present—that all that passes within this and the other House of Parliament, should be com municated to our constituents and to the country at large; and if I am of opinion, that the footing on which that communication now stands is perhaps preferable, on the whole, to art distinct acknowledg ment of its existence, it is because that footing of indulgence affords greater facilities than any other for animadverting on any occurrence like that to which I am now about to call the attention of the House. During the twenty-five years that I have had the honour to have a seat in Parliament, it has but once fallen to my lot to have to bring forward any complaint of this nature, and that once was only a short time ago—l think it was last Session—and it was with respect to the same Newspaper, of the conduct of which I now complain. On that occa sion, there was a most gross misrepresentation of a transaction in the House, in which you, Sir, as well as myself, were concerned. But when I called the attention of the House to that transaction—and I must say, that I did so as much with reference to the character or interests of others as with reference to myself-1 merely stated the case, and expressed' my hope, that the misrepresentation might }ravel been accidental; and you, Sir, will perhaps recol lect my having declined prneeding any further than, merely putting the House in possession of the case, and hoping that the notice then taken of it would, operate as an admonition for the future. I am sorry, however, to say, that that admonition had not operated in the way in which it ought ; for it was impossible that even the most candid mind could see any thing like accident or mistake in the misrepresen tation to which lam now to advert. I am sorry to say the misrepresentation is not only of so gross, but also of so malignant a nature, as to leave no doubt on uiy mind of its being in every way worthy of the lover on such an occasion. 'rich is new even in tie ann. ty easily occur in which th .n Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Hume, the Member . .an extremity to which I sin for the Burgh of Aberdeen), with reference to the (Hear, hear.) To prevent that eytremity debate of a former night, made some observations ring to any other Member, I now lay - on something that had fallen from me in the course the table of the House. I do it conscie, of ,that debate, which, being absent, I had not an it in discharge of the duty I owe to th 'Opportunity of hearing. I came into the House be- not on account of any thing personal t fore the Honourable Member sat down. Some of 'myself, lam satisfied. Having now ( the Members who now hear me may recollect the tention of the House to this subject—it state cf the House that evening in point of numbers. of the Housecollectively, for the sake From the thin attendance of Members, and not think- of its deliberations, for the sake of tl jng there was any thing in what had fallen from the that communication of what takes plac , Honourable Gentleman with respect to me, which to our Constituents—that I wish them made it particularly necessary for me to notice it, offence under their consideration (Heal and from my not having heard the former part of ing done so, I should now sit down, bi his speech, I did not deem it advisable for me to pro- duty to state previously to the House, long the discussion. The House will judge what ber of the same Newspaper of to-day I must have been my surprise to find in The Times graph . which is intended for some apol Newspaper of next day the following sentence, in sume, for the offence. The paragraph which the Honourable Gentleman is made to say— and then I shall take the liberty of st " Ministers might laugh, but let them look at the nion on it. The paragraph is as folio , r o e f gret to ll s o ta u te x:s t s hat adhconski on rbleter other side of the picture ; let them survey the misery the Committee on the Finance ' Resolt:t r io t:l n gi s e l i! of the poor laborious industrious wretches at Car- Ac'c'oNtlV:t lisle, or even of the unhappy beings they meet in In the great MISS of matter which man every our streets, and he believed there would be found for the Press, after the Debates in the two and whenever we fail of woo ; but one man among them who would still keep a . or while the y are going on, it is im?osstble !h. not so m etimes desire occur.t. forthforth curi a justrmasiVidraiL the smile on his countenance, and that would be a smile anxious • of self-congratulation from a Right Honourable G e n - of what passes tleman (here my name is inserted by the Editor), that , the pains Wt. aim that we should hardly have by habitually turning into ridicule the sufferings of f ence upon the plea of ineuriafudil, our Wm the u i r mper o f L c r tio H n u of our; irpo e wi n ch muchfeelin na tur e, nalhis fellow-creatures, he had been able to place him the distresses of the ur Poor, and observing (ar g y self so far above their unhappy condition--(continued cheers)"—(Hear, hear, hear.)—Now, Sir, I think I our Reporter) a smile upon dm Ministerial ii seated by us as taxing only one Right I itlflo4 may confidently say, if there be one man in the (Mr. CA NNING) with indulging in laughter on su House who has heard this sentence read, and will ' • present. We shall not now repeat the offensiv That Right Hon. Gentleman , we have since get up and lay his hand on his heart , and say upon i his honour he believes that sentence, if not spoken, sake of correcting it; suffice it to say, that the most authentic source, to lay before our It could have been accidentally inserted, then I will nut attacked as described in our Report. We give up the busin&s, Aid not say one syllable fut which was so misunderstood by our Reporter. ther on the subject. No Gentleman can, I conceive, „ Now, if the case complaiued of have any other than that which is the impression on omission, or of accident4l misrepre my mind. And there is no Gentleman who now mi g ht be some ground for this excuse gof hears me, who will not, I hope, agree with me that • am • ree ma, I will ask, could lead I had but one course to adopt—to apply to the Ho- —could lead to the belief, that the irn nourable Gentleman himself, which I did, I hope in the original paragraph was calculi' terms of civility, to know whether he bad made use namely, that I was present while tl of the language attributed to him in the Newspaper Gentleman was speaking, and joint; in question. From that Honourable Gentleman, as the sufferings of the poor, was ce.rii soon as accidental circumstances admitted of it—as That in a long, and, as the House mut soon as his absence from home and his engagement not hastily composed sentence—a sent in an Election Committee would allow him , I re- ing any marks of incrria about it, in ceived such an answer as satisfied me he could not nourable Gentleman is made to direc i t possibly have made use cf the language attributed preach almost beyond bearing, and to him, though he stated, that not having seen the with a 53711. . 1 9 e $ lcl :ering On my mouth., Newspaper, he could not state bow far it contained, the descrip ;on of sufferings, such a: or did not contain, an accurate report of what he could hardly bear—that this was the said. With the Newspaper he was accordingly fur- s i on or was ' an accidental mistake, I niched, and the Honourable Gentleman returned it who hears me, there is no man in by a Noble Ft tend of mine, who was the medium of possibly believe. That it may be lai communicatioa between the Honourable Gentleman fection of our common nature I am and myself, with the most satisfactory, the most lieve ; for unfortunately of our comma gentlemanly, and most honourable explanation. Af- hood is one imperfection, and maligns ter receiving that explanation on Saturday last, I did (Hear, hear.) This paragraph, more th. give that Honourable Gentleman an assurance, that in my - opinion, calls for the interposition satisfied as I was with that explanation, I deemed For what does it say? Why this—th, it absolutely necessary for me to bring his Breach complaining, we ought to be thankft of Privilege before the House this day. I said, are not worse than they are—instead • that, as far as I was myself concerned, I saw no us for our accidental errors, you ou, necessity for any farther satisfaction of any kind, thankfulness for our general fidelil nor could I expect any; that that which might be which we are disposed to wonder considered injurious to my character, if it came from ought to be thankful that we take u any respectable source, being disavowed by that re- responsibility which is so very burthcaso: spectable source— coming from a source which must (Hear, hear;)—lf we allow ourselves ' be below contempt—(Hear, hear!)—required no fur- in this manner, we can henceforward ther notice from me on my own account; but that I to complain, if, collectively and ii had a duty to discharge to ethers , which rendered it are held forth to the detest ation of necessary for me to bring the subject forward. There (Hear, hear.)—But when did this p: must be persons in this House less hardened, from its appearance? This little failure of situation and from inexperience, to attacks of this takes place on Wednesday, and th nature than myself—men who would rather bear the comes 'forth on the Monday folio• attack in silence, than expose themselves to the per- Honourable Gentleman, who was as secution of continued attacks from the quarter from rect the misrepresentation as if he him whence the former came. On their behalf, I feel it party to i t, w hi c h h e was not, h a d my duty to bring this libel before the House—a libel for that purpose. In the mean time, the most atrocious, that, instead of coming forth un- d ay Newspaper i n this Metropol is, and der the authority of the wretch, be he who he may, paper throughout the country, I am ' who was the author of it, he attempted to put for- manner described in this report. Ins. ward an honourable man to give the greater counte- of thinking this paragraph any apiali seance to his slanders— (Hear, hear, hear!) I ask , if an agg ravation of the offence ; and I t 0 this practice is to remain unchecked, what will be the the House will on this occasion exec , consequence? It will put if in the power of any man whi ch I hope they do not consider • who overhears our debates making an abuse of the ti by a course of long indulgence, most conspicuous and honourable names, to put into th ough ea we have allowed an indulger. the mouth of any man any slander he pleases. The casionally abused, though we may Courts of Law are in such a case good for absolutely to wave the exercise of our privileges, nothing. If I had gone to the Court of King's Bench, them for the proper discharge of the for instance, I might, perhaps, have convicted the to ourselves and to the country—( Editor of having published a libel; but I could not, If it is truiy, but of the Commons of Er e that these are not the pi by convicting him, have the satisfaction of fixing the House on ly, blame on the right quarter ; for I could not have the hear,)—lf we possess these privileges, satisfaction of proving that the words in question had of our own distinction but for tie . not been said by the Honourable Member to whom great functions committed to us—an .. they are imputed—and I might perhaps run the n ot more necessary as a defence against theencrtiath. risk of convicting an innocent man for ati ue report, ments of the Crown on the one hand, than against as a Court of Law does not possess the means of the licentiousness of the people on the other, then it is proving that the report is incorrect. I might have proper that these privileges should protect us from the satisfaction of punishing the Editor, but I could abuses like that now brought before the House. — not have the satisfaction of proving that the News paper was in fault, and not the Honourable Gentle- (Hear, hear, hear.)—l have now discharged my duty man. I think I have shewn that any man who is —I now give in the paper, and that which is inten• slandered in this manner must either acquiesce and ded as an extenuation of the offence. But in a case remain silent under it, or have recourse to th e other in which I am personally con c e r ned, I do not con. alternative of a personal appeal. Ile h as no other ceive myself at liberty to s uggest to the House any alternative. It is in the row cr of the meane s t scribe course of proceeding. This business may be disposed the press to traduce in the of without any reference to the individual concerned bier that ever disgraced grossest manner the most honourable men.—l as k, if who, in the due discharge of the functions belongirs, it is. fit that this should continue unchecked? But the to a Member of the House, has brought the offencc ma tter might not rest there. A pe rson i n t h e same forward. Before I sit down I must add, that 1 h ,, ‘• difficult situation might not have the ad vantage of taken a considerable degree of pains in ine a u inE :r having so honourable a Gentleman to appe a l t o as I w hat was actually said by the Honourable lientl• man, and there is not one Member, who was then had. I might, perhaps, have had to appeal to a per- s on not deficient in honourable feeling s , b u t i n a mo- the house, who has the least recollection of any thing m eet of carelessness, or from an ide a of impoliteness being said in the least like the passage complained of."—The Right Hon. Gentleman then sat down, and in the manner in which he was called on, o r f rom t h e the passage complained of and the paragraph in The w ay in which I know many Membe rs are i n t h e h a bi t Times of Monday were successively read by the Clerk of dismissing their speeches from mem or y a f ter t h ey have delivered them, he m ight to him in the Report which the Right Hon. Gentle have said th a t h e did for him to deny having used the language attributed no t consider himself responsible for N ewspaper Re- Mr. HUNIE said, that it was almost unnecessary ports, and did not consider it nec essary to enter into man had brought under the consideration of the a ny explanation as to what he said. If I had app lied to some Members who happened to hea r the speec h, House. Whatever sentiments he entertained on th , subject of discussion in the House, he should mere: every man must have known the motiv es f rom which ' agood deal mere : iaie been guilty of that kind 'of personality, whic:i I asked him, and it would have required would really take from the force of any observation of nerve in any man to induce him to give me a sae (Hear, hear.) The Right Bon. Cepa:man llii'i it - . • .. A DA. 4.: 4 , otos. porimo+ • .•~ +»a►F^»;: „ • 1. 14 .04e/. l° ' 4 .1.11/gl, 'IP -Vatik7o6,ooBlllm+ • -waissosidAsF. , ,---- -vwwwrigni. - ..w.....,- Iptorriti,yogior ;topic imp . • • 4 • ' "•. . , A '.. • I,a I • .1 • S. 40 , t ~. . ' - , . - - . . tl. 'art of the Supplies of the year. They were not mentioned notice of the House. I happened to be absent, as bsfactory answ •' t ` • frookthe inferences drawn by the Noble Mover of the in the Annual vote , but were intended for t►e Sinking. Fund. sometimes will happen, during the fiat two or three of slander whit and evidently therefore not for she service of the year. He • BIM ' The ` ~►orks in which the children were em- 'hoped the Petitions would be receiied, or mat his Noble Friend hours of the debate on Tuesday last. In that debate and a case ma: • . . .• • ,_. 10-... .....• -IA ...1... .1.. ........r .k. linose en the subiect. an Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Hume, the Member ternative but a _ _ .. . . • I _t-----..... •6n 1 Nome hone. % • ' , ' •• • 1111 , s I • I I, '‘ • I r t 1 : ;. i t 1 , • ; • . This r. a -.o r nals of licer. * there is no 4. rl ',hall not aF r id, ity from occur- to this Paper ,)! it .!,:tjously—l dr, r , he House, ar,, tommysel f,.. • called the a : t is for the sak . of the digni: the secuntl r: ! .ce in the Hoes, 1 n to take this Tr, hear.) H.Lv. )ut I feel it rn.. that in a Nutt . . there is a pa..- 3 . rlogy, as I ;It, h I shall ! . c... ; stating my rror crept into t: t up the ilepn: Tu. ~.ruy ; , e it.c I !sat it is rtiJl :cess, such are ,• re to so!icir . are mutt : ignoutta perm: g and Wild Cttldtig r ; Benches, is r• ourable Gent: so .erious a schjer. . 'e learned, oast live passage, far :t e are trubled, Readers the pasiT were a case e esentation. bet ie ; but what de. d to the n - ,istal.. mpression winno Dated to make, the Honounthie ed in a laugh a. ing to incaria? ISi be convinced, ntence not bear- which the He- agaimt mere- says, drat I sa: s and sat soar is human native effect of orris- there is no m.e the country can tid to the imper- a willing to be- tor. nature. false- nity is a..o.her— than the offence, /oft of the Ileum. —thin ir.stead at tfut that matter I of reproaEline, Dugan to to Wt ity—a fidelity at ourselves; you upon ourselves rensome to us— es to- be treated d have no masts. individually, s.l: f the country — paragraph mak , ..- of human nature this ex la naticz owing—after the is anxious to cor- mself had been a exerted himseli e, in every Sun- rd in every News r held forth in the ;stead, therefore, Mlogy, I think I trust, therefore, ercise the power they have Igence, but gence to be cc- Ly often cozen' , es, we shall reran he duty we ore ( Hear, hear.) — privileges of this England.—(Hear, I, not for the sake discharge of the and that they are inst the encroach- and, than against . it other, then it protect therote ctusfrom Ire House.— cha:zed my dory at whirl, is intea:-