Star. — London, England, 1819-09-06 00:00:00

the cr owd. There 11 4 13 be 5® people • a m , time. o ne of the Corfoiate./likgfi. • C o uld, EA. "ifacelesield, said, be remembered tbe - on. .li e eting 3t Mlnchestet, on Nlonday the 16th lst o n t he Tuesday event o 8 There were only 'the list Regiment in Macclesfield. They ~..cTo ned in the Town Hall, to take care of t He did not know of v, hat the baggegg i. he did rot see any arms. On Tuesday a bout eil,ht o'clock, a great many people tevt her. They did nut then appear dis t, r i o t. He thought they were assembled to learn news from Nlanchester. They had „ n t he Monday evening, and afterwards dis t,/ quietly. On the Tuesday evening, the i i non to riot which he saw was their crying ittolorr op eposit Mr. Wilson's house. H e fee the defendant among them at all. As 'le beard them call " Cobbler'," he thought, ~,,,,istrate, that it was proper to read the Riot D e re were about 300 or -100 people opposite when they called " Cobbler. They had wed about half an hour before the Itiot . 1 1 When the Act had been read, the' d ee med it expedient to get as many is they could ; they got some horses, and t h immediately upon the mob. Tile wit got pretty well off. They threw stones or, at the witness, and at others. In about a half after they dispersed the mob. broke the windows of Mr. Grimsditch, of Mr. Barnet, a special constable ; 'of of the witness; of the Mayor; of d u, and of a great many others, about altogether. The peaceable inhabitants were th alarmed. He did not bear any, words ept" Cobbler;" but. there were other ex- 11411, a silk-manufacturer at Macclesfield, ?re his assistance on the 17th to the Magis iF order of the Mayor. He saw the defendant era about ten o'clock, and took him into , Ile ,„was then about 700 or SOO yards from ; , e of Wilson; the mob were then dispersing. A;dre•called.—The defendant was Brought as a Magistrate. The defendant said, r renon had 2ut a cockade in his hat in a t.oiic. There was written in his hat " Hunt q : Witness did not see the bat, but said ( $41:• that he bad heard of it. ie-called.—The defendant was shouting, took him into custody, as he appeared lag part with the rest. Witness was at the I with the soldiers. The inhabitants were wined.—The prisoner was making a a a ,:runken man. The mob consisted prin . manufacturers, but there were some wea among them. ,aation of ;he defendant was then put in Mr. Gould, the Magistrate, said, that no sad been used to induce the defendant to It was as follows :—" Samuel Hardens says, Hunt and Liberty' written on his hat, but out. May wrote the words on his hat.— IViUlaw was with him when he went into Wilshaw is a silk-weaver."—This was the it. .recAlled.—There was at that time no ►te between the masters and :nen in Mite .ing wages. 'TORNEY-GENERAL said, that this was . the • prosecution. then rose and addressed the Jury for The Learned Counsel said—" Gen the task %% Filch the duties of the profession on me at this moment is far from being a or a light one. Insurrection and tumult, disorder, shall never find an advocate in at the same time, the individual charged is entitled to have, and shall have, the of my exertions in his defence. lam my the great danger of all Meetings of this my Learned Friend, the Attorney Gene . go farther than myself in reprobating bet I will tell you the effect of the impression in this and similar cases. As 1 have a ling against Meetings of this sort, from the rhiela they create, in the same proportion I nece,sary to put a guard upon myself that !client may not be misled in the plain question chid is all we have to try to-day. A de comes to have a case of this kind tried by rejadices which cannot fail to exist. My nend, in stating his case, thought fit to rge view of the object of the people in this trighbouring Counties ; and I do a little . what he said respecting ;evolution, re overthrow of all property on the F in ' defined in the Spencean System. Ido not these topics have been legitimately intro . 'present occasion. I say, that with the yol have now to discharge, they have never to do : but they may inflame your and so they will mislead your minds : ac the constitution of the human mind, that must be, the effect. If those whO are :iistoined to the analyzation of the mind, and fedevotecl their whole time and talents to - us el tLis abstract description, are unable ttaselves of the influence of first impres a be supposed that you, whose attentions tessity be tlevoted to other pursuits, will , to overcome those difficulties by which m inds have been embarrassed ? Having: ul the clanger iu which you stand, to 1 / 4 1 "g at this case with that cool and &spas 4nm* which you on to exercise, I now I 'lv 14W Of the case. It is the very founiip-' I " e aroment of my Learned friend, that the. a °d tile intent of the persons why were 40'1114 ' 111 4 occa: ion w ere t h e same . In all ea , vbere a man n. charged with tint or.♦ it is extremely difficult to aseeettin I ctives ; but they are open to explaaat that ouch, 17th of August th ese w: "toe tov.l, of Maccizsfielti. To eutiee "Tdiet, it is not enough to pro* to r 'cre, as Le might be there, however it r i d a b le t ,r"ea brills curiosity only. 7he intent and the Again : A man may be 44 ble motive . Ar.:l4taylor said he s P : Pcle atalaing.information, to,irn At ( O il the place 0.-so that a man ma; for a venial but a laudable purpose. hlte the Cr ;t am - , time *.pj Could, ..11aeclesi N e eting O all ^ , a u.n 'lol . the fi:j arled in I He die h e did about e ~• tegeth: 110 t• s to learn nI • 03 t he Mc v „ l.g oied clot, to ‘ obbler !" f ee the de he beard t mate, There wer e when t r i ote d ab ma d. 11 es deem ec as they ;eta imm got p nd a bat o rs brok , ;oft •teeper ; 10001, • aitogethe loch larme dee pc N Col rum Hall, a le gave his a Ili order of 3,cts.; abo jr, 111,,sras ; ae of 11 ilsc Gouj re•ca hi:.: as a c Person I uitc. T It) ." . r nsomr stu .11.11 te-cal *. - • took 1 Ming part Hall I ith fumed. s•essmined . ae a drutilt mannfa ,:d others at • nao. i aatic 3lr. • had been It was as "hunt an tshout. 3 • Wilshaw Wilshas .ci it. Hall recal ipute bet respect t ATTORNE' !the pros( .Jose s the ifrodant. the task on me a or a 111 phlic disnr; .itut, at the t'atm is ern xvit of m' see of the ; and my I .cant go but I wit mind in t • fetling ap which th oeccssat Irnent ra: ',which it comes Fejudi Fnend !large vie! 'fe Leigh!) . of wh: atld the defined these to on th e , . , dray yaa whiter sand„ to the that is ktostura, hate devc ' IS est th eta tot it 6 of seces si • to nand You ut "4:mg at to :he Id ( toe ar g and ti °a this hind ss. • ?, it i s moti , s. t 0 t'ae I to a v Pas thei 1, he ro tat not 44 ' 1 dabl i Plup to e, . . There is ateother class of caste: metiiitay be bron AD such, a Meeting by th e i n fl ue n c e o f liquor, A'A sideyable portion of every crowd of rhat.sort.con . sin of persons not brought together to font chug par ticular object, but merely from curiosity to Wt h '... t etS the proceedings. Men in liquor are always led into crowds without considering the danger which they' themselves may incur. Let us look at the fact in the presort case.- Leam ed Friend ha s u se d topics, I will not say for tisepurpose becatise I am sure it is not so, but which, n evert h e less, must have the effect of inflaming your minds. Who were the principal movers of this disturbance Mr. Gould, the. Magi• straw, states that it was the weavers. The persons connected with the silk trade were the persons with whom the distress existed, and from whom' the in flammation sprung. The defendant is not connected with that . trade : he• is a w oo d t urner , f o ll ow i ng a daily bus iness, subject to no fluctuations of price, and having no alliance whatever with those persons from whose distress or discontent all this tumult proceeded. It is said that he was there, and that he used certain expressions ; but Mr. Naylor muse be a person of very extraordinary memory, if, in the midst of the disorder which he has stated, he can recollect the pre cise words spoken on that occasion. Hi had a diffi culty of recollecting even the names of the persons with whom he conversed. He could mention only two ; and yet he charges his memory with the pre- cise words which he used to the defendant, and which the defendant replied to him. Ido not mean to say there was no conversation between him and the de fhndant, but I say that I must withhold my faith : I cannot believe that he recollects the precise words'in the order in which the conversation passed. You arc not to believe every thing that is said because it is sworn ; for we all know, that in cases of this sort, evidence is to be received with very great grains of allowance. It is, therefore, almost impossible that he should recollect the exact phi ase of the conversation: but, supposing you do believe Naylor, and give him credit, try the conduct of the man at the Bar by the expressions which Naylor charges him with having used. Gould did not see him at all; and the last witness only apprehended him. What was the phrase? What were the objects and motives of thil man, on Naylor's own shewing ? The defendant is made to say, " They have injured me." Who? Not the Government,—but the Gentlemen! an expression to tally without meaning, and which could only proceed from a drunken man, who did not know what he wis saying. According to Mr. Naylor, this defendant, this journeyman wood -turner, from a back alley, with a wife and two children, who had sallied forth from a pot-house, pretended that he could do that which neither the Military nor Magistrates could do—that he could take them all home, one by one. Was this the expression of a sober man, having met for an improper motive? or of • drunken man, with ale in his head, and all his wit and jed4ment out? But he said, " I will take them away, tf they (the Gentlemen) will make a bargain with me." What was the contract ? Was it for any restoration of rights ? Was . it to ottain Par li amentary Reform, or as equalization of prop er t y ? No. It was that he should have a quart o ale pet man, and he would send them all home ! Was this any thing more than the absurd conduct of it drunken man who could not keep out of the crowd ? Mr. Naylor said, he saw the defendant at -a comer reconnoitering. How did he know that ? How could ha tell what the defendant , was engaged in, when he stood at the corner of the sweet ? What were his acts ? Stones were thrown by the crowd, but. Mr. Naylor did not venture to .swear that defendant threw one. The door was broken, and the gas-light extinguished ; but Naylor did not swear that he saw the defendant engaged in those proceedings. A man may be a rioter without 'any acts of violence done by himself. But when facts ate not proved, which, if they existed, might be proved, it is a most important criterion for you and for others to judge by. Hall appeared to me to give . his evidence fairly—and what did he say ? That the * conduct of the. defendant was the ordinary rough, absurd, behaviour of a drunken man, and not that of a sober person assembled for an unlawful purpose. Then, as to the hat : Mr. Gould, the Magistrate, never saw it ; but the defendant in an improvident moment, when drunk and off his guard, said the words were written by May in a drunken frolic. Now, let me ask you one question :—Suppose that a man frcns folly, inadvertence, or accident, should find 'himself in a mob, and the mob run about, and he runs with them ; the military come, and there he is—he may explain as he likes ; but there he is. If he says " I went from curiosity," he will be told that is no evi dence ; it is only his own account, and. cannot be re ceived. If he says, 0 I ran to save my life," the an swer will be, that is your own statement : then how is a defence to be made ? It is by shewing that he was not one of the persons whose distresses induced 'them to meet ; that he was a person of former good character, and that he did not commit any acts of violence. Being in a mob, is only prima facie evidence of an illegal object ; the real cause of being there nay be explained by those criteria which I have stated • and if you do not try it by them , I de not know flow you can try it at all. If you try it in that way, the defendant is entitled to your verdict. I shalt' prove he had nothing to do with fluctuations of price that lie is a man hitherto of peaceable and orderly' conduct ; and on former occasions, so far from being given to tumults of this kind, a man of unimpeach able loyalty. If by abstaining from any violence on occasious or this description, my character will not stand me in stead, nothing will. I ought, perhaph, to say one word as to what fell from my Learned Friend, which 1 thiuk anight . hav,e been spared : spoke of the mercy of the yrosecator . ; to detract fro any praise i tp whirls y m Learned Friend 1 do not want i ' may think the proseFotor„wheeeeethe may he r , th is e en d d e : fend; tled ; but the only question here is, whirth e - ev itry of the charge on ! otheF sallich he is irke z tect ? the . . • berations oP, British Court of Justice. Verdicts have - ken given (I Wl 4 l not rillude to any in rirtieular), which have done moil is preserviag the public peace than could h ave b een d on ? by any of the mast strik ing example s t h at cou ld , h ave f ) rap made with a view to public eipediency.-4 Shill now i!all,the witnesses for the defendant,- and it will' Oath - at.you to d side upon the case; and you cannot teach thi! a better lesson, or contribute mare to the preseil'a ' Lion of. the public peace, than by she Wing them that dependenCe should always be placed on the due and impartial administration of the laws." • J. Clowes Orme said, he was a master-manufac turer at Macclesfield ; had known the defendant 14 years; he had lived with him 'and had worked for him, and . had been very attentive to his business. The defendant hail no other connection with the silk trade, tieeptin making the turnins : he always con sidered him a ver y civ il man . lie savi him on the day in question, about three o'clock, when he. ;vas much in liquor. He never saw or heard that the defendant was against his King and country ; but quite the other way. M. Et Corbishley lived at Macclesfield; had known the defendant many years ; he worked for, him eight years. He considered hint 'an kieest, peacea ble, loyal.man. • • The CHIEF JUSTICE then. summed up the case to the Jury. He said, that this was an indictment for a misdemeanour, and It charged the defendant with a riot. The legal meaning of the word ,riot was a disturbance of the public peace by three persons or more assembling together, of their own authority, to assist each other in some enterprise of a private nature, and afterwards conducting themselves in a tumultuous _manner. The first witness • in this case was Mr. Naylor, who said, that the defendant was among the crowd, hissing and shouting, so that he was not in the assembly by any of those accidents which the Learned Counsel for the defence had suggested. He was among them, calling Mr. Wilson " Cobbler," by which it was evi dent that he was taking an active part in the distur. hence. He encouraged the boys to throw stone;, say ing, " Now, lads, go it." Stones were then 'thrown. A great part of the defence of the Learned Counsel was, that the defendant was a drunken person ; but drunkenness was no excuse in law. If a drunken man killed another, would it be allowed or tolerated that he should set up that as an answer? A man it that situation- was answerable for all he did. The defendant said, that they had injured him. Who was meant by the word Gentlemen had no explanation in the course of the trial, but the Learned Counsel had said something upon it. The Learned Counsel had contended, with great ability, which, on all occasions, he displayed, that the defendant might have been in the crowd by accident. But what was his motive for being there? He disclosed it when he said, ".The Gen tlemen have injured me ;" and then he added, that the mob were under his controul, and it was clear that all which the others did was'by his instigation. When they Were going to break the lamp, the witness saw him reconnoitring. The Learned Counsel asked, how could a man tell that ? Certainly, he might tell it very well, 'from observing the conduct of the party. l The defendant saw the 000 r broken, and the case ' ments forced in; and yet, though he said he could lead off the mob, he took no steps to do it, but joined in their proceedings. This took place after the tarry were drawn away to another quarter, and, no doubt, the attack was made under • that knowledge.)Fortunately for tht preservation of Macclesfield, ate Gentlemen of that towA assembled, and saved it from destruction. As to the memorandum made by Naylor, if it had contained any thing contradic tory of his evidence to-day, the Jury would have heard it •from the Learned Counsel. [Mr. Jones here . said, " I did not read the paper." 3 Then the Learn.; ed Counsel must have believed what the witness said. This case was proved by that witness, and by those who followed him. The next witness said, that six men only were left to guard the baggage.— The first word he heard in the crowd was C ob bler, op site the house of Wilson, a word used in hostility to Wilson—and the first witness deposed, that he heard the defendant call out " Cobbler." It was of no consequence whether he broke the windows, and forced the door ; he was in the mob, and was answer able in law. Then there were two witnesses clearly proving the interference of the defendant, and his taking part with the rest in the riot and disturbance, not opposed by evidence on the other side—it was only said that he was drunk. The law of England ad mitted of no such defence. Suppose they had all been drunk, and had burnt Macclesfield to the ground, and .killed all the inhabitants, would the Learned Counsel have them excused on that account ? All the witnesses confirmed the evidence of Nay lor, that the defendant was taking an active part— and the Jury must not find a verdict of acquittal, eves if they thought he was intoxicated, unless they . discredited the evidence which the Counsel for the prosecution had adduced. In his Lordship's opinion there could not be a clearer case, but he left it to the Jhry to pronounce their judgment upon it. The Jury, in the course of five minutes, returned a verdict of—Guilty. Ralph Wright, aged 24, a silk-weaver, of klareles-; field, was then indicted on a similar Aarge. Mr. EVANS his Counsel, said, that he Would a '.,snit the evidence of Mr. Gould, is'adduceff in former case, and any thing which related' to the neral kind and quality of the riot ; he merely Tft. quired evidence as to the piesence ansl'beh . avi . oer of,, the defendant. ' Winesscs were then called, who 'deposed, that the; defendant was among thecrowd, and . that the tncou ruged them, by calling 0ut..." That's right ; Oat s Tour sort ; (ion speed the plough r but he had nothing in his band, and slot consont any,__ , 4o . knse. Mr. Samuel Stotr - , OT blraCilFsfie!il, +tugs* for theiefendAtt halatelv.- Ea& . , . ***mob, and *as he acting with ? t petent Thht. clestly prayed by Mr. Baylor ; Wunlesi the liit'llNraifteveci Ws evidence, there could be no doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. HlThe CHIN" ANTICS . stithrne4 up, and said, this se *as thadeeet *is clearly as ifie fotcriter. What.; ever the charactet of the defendant might have been • - bff.ore, and, at. 4nd after the battle ot Waterloo, it could not be taken into consideration by the July ; cbyt it might weigh M the amount of the sentence to b e +bused upon him; if the .lury should find That he had aced with the mob. The Jut j immediately returned a verdict of-Guilty. James Parr, aged 36, a clock-maker, at Iktgan, who was indicted at the last Assizes for the Clinnty . of Chester, and a true bill found against him. for se- .. dition and misdemeanour, 'to which he did not - appear and plead, was now placed at the bar and arraigned. The ATTORNEY GENERAL said, that from 'certain circumstances which had occurred, he didn't wish to prosecute this case any further at. present. He would therefore consent that the defendant should he .discharged an hi? gag recognizance ,, in the stun of . ElOO, to appear when called upon. Mr: James.: Connsel for the defendant,. sitii6fd :his assent.:. • ' • The defendant then entered intd the:recogniznnee, and WO discharged. , • JOSEPH HARRISON'. We stated in our last report, that a true bill bad been found against Harrison, and that he intended to traverse till next Assizes :' hewas to ! Jay brought up 'to plead to the indictment, when he requested to have a 'copy of it. The Court said it was not usual 'to -grant a copy-till the plea was recorded. The indict ment was • then read, and the defendant pleaded_ Not Guilty. He then renewed his application for. a copy of theindictment, which the Court granted. He observed, that he should wish to be tried during the present SesSion. The Arroartre-Gaw anat.--He had understood that the defendant intended traversing till Spring; in consequence of which, the witnesses, for the. prosecti ticni had returned home; directions, however, should be given for their re-attendance on Monday. The Court said it might be more convenient to the par ties to fix-it for Tuesday. Harrison said, he should be ready on that day, and pledged himself then to go to trial. SIR ROBERT WILSON. Sir ROBERT WILSON has transmitted frcim Paris the following Address to the Electors of Southwark. It will be observed, that at the time of writing it he. was unacquainted with the fact of the Government having expressed its decided approbation of the con duct of the Manchester Magistrates and Cavalry : GxerteinM—l should not only be unworty of the honour of represeptbreyou, but I should be destitute of every manly, as well as every"Coostitutional feeling, if I did not'address you, to melba my abhorrence of the late sanguinary and Illegal trans actions at Manchester, fee sanguinary and Illegal they appear to be, eyes according to the mounts published in the Newspapers 11110 St favourable to Me abuse of power. I do not presume to dictate to yes soy einem of proceeding,;.but if you think it ex pedient to assemble and. rowed .yoter opinions on Mis oventfut catastrophe, I shag certainly semalite thesetresomLeeseldras time which detain toe in Parka s nd proceed to Lowiel M fault riu ea tat day tppcdated. . -4 I trust DO MiligatilLAM be found- 1 e the lelasials l . order the. military mantliesof:their-Beilow adults ;* that no aimed Qtizens will be: found eager to movie's- an unarmed multitude, without even distinction of ses.;:.but as I consider de right of the People to usemble r toxieliberate, and to resolve, as the foundation and.bulwark of everr.other right, 'I am pre patted to maintain k as becomes a guardian of the public liberty, lei 1110 tear of the consesnences - shall deter me from the per- - eof my duty. It is, however, a consolation fOr me to dida, according to the information I have been enabled to oh- Sob N this subject, at this distance and date; that-the Govern ment of the country Arm not advisedly implicated in the offences Or de fatal 14th of August. Access to. the Throne is, therefore, netbamed, sad theEreentive Authority may be approached will a emdblent hope that an appeal to its justice will not be made in vale. The crisis is most awful :—Contending Despotism slid Anarchy menace the kzniire with dein-action ; it can only be awed )y the interposition of that Body which is composed of Citizens resolved to obtain the Reform of the Representative System, boa wbo Shp are united for the Protection of Properly, - and themantenance of the Established Institutions of the Sete. " I have the honour, acc. Ste. " ROBERT THOS. WILSON.L “ Parts, Aug. 27. The Freeholders of Middlesei are determined ate laving a Meeting to take into consideration* the late 'th =dal transactions at Manchester. - A Requisition • • to the Sheriff has been in circulation during **week, and the number of signatures, on §a}! 11 .4 1 11.48)44. amounted to THE PRINCE REGENT,Such isihe loiaftemper of the Britith People, that they Will not credit Kr sisters, when tad:by the' dart the Reutiii thrake differently from themselves cauthe Manchesteruffait:. Oicy say, that it is a trickthat his. Roy,al-,Hightiess is deceived; and that it is only nssesar.rto form him of e ttnitl, to inddielim to dismiss from his pitiencc thciettiliikhohave giliecttie kr, itid who veva consprointae hie repOtatioh the betiehtetiee;i Inanity, and gaidgess. To irter.o - to the -, conatry that the nature oritii Royal flightless is not ~chaugebst hat he the keenest sensibYitieo f and that Liman su&rinjtis IttreitrixCite ifti nii?st geneicsas 'iyiniiathies vole wiilielate a fact wbi?h • reaeheil Ds. 4111 Oar sego, and which ve pledge .ourselves is atnhetitis. Ow Wednesday se'nnight the ,Prince, ythae - on ,134,..1;ay kern fprtsl4 l so. ll - w this town, Acalail't,hat OKBo a inAvq:o : of i s alou t h;•Ahd to *bombe wasigreatii , ottuil, lay CA the k t ed'ilf &aft ' PrinFe'haketied - to* atonic .4f the invalid* the of_Ye!phiutOlVitiq* stma -.ma so Rieucti I i cases fend ant is guilty of the charge °,n 7_cott"===, -i - : jit . , - :: E ! a m. ael sta . . ! ie, - OT MaeClfstiey?, Atcsyno , par ii, &He •in•a t n_ u r rs - so - . I.: e - c3 -15.: 7-_---.-7----.-_-: -- • coo- Kcep your minas cl,eP 9i 2 .„.v.vvry....." 1 , 0741; t h e 00 4 =060' 12, satit•that theffr(iti3dant badlately re- chest!r, ittliit . An :a4 , 4 a, Eh! . . what forget, as far as you can, . the es n ie r„ ... o s turtibd iroin 'la Miny, and that be had never oh- state in which lie found 14 fftpikt,unirtuaar„ . AtiQn.: thew Meetjrigs.hAve C.c.cAo 9 9o' P a ',.1_, (114115 ..., 7 '. e _ . served any , thing. ' nv - roperin his conduct before . *. wept eeerit2: l lL, 11c 1 .A9 3 9,lei._slntvi sto tc ) jr • .... vas Ai WiliCh thil*ing P , Pi Mq."4 s 99.atiFitrir: "Yla --- ve AqinatlOTOgl,t„* la4 v 7ft:lfi444.** sffiii, 7 r r .5,. 1 / 4 t.i,tt-o„l,., notc :izzi .,w• ~•'. I , II . 0t ati Old Isiah msc g t t c the Some fAar tht4it tlillt POlie. teiliP tM J P I / • • A : snot hitcf 4ais isAlic ; cf : Aptas.wv p_t. i s . ~ . , ,hat at softie 41f-ration in:fletilfintatag.fas s r. •'''' . ictle or Wafekluo,- ', . atdi reasved ait• al tionlie-bistft tilso4 l , stvo . indis-! Gentlemen, verdicts should never ppw .. • , his kiiiiii: • • 'Mani 'Wang' inedil In of 4n, nil , _ .. • , ;dent - lon ul Le ob - i lic aP4cliencY• if .0 4 -FR9I-- Ali iksjt: 1 . 2 4 , • Fie tontansedibllse .Arfortarlbastt ti, . sal . , • • 1 t there' iP*ol9.l4 r int i ;T e ir'!!lik?l'l l t tf , a ) .• ;* Vas 4-01Iiiir +i ii ref 04 01 . 4 • 1° ..Y 1 - ~,, z ~_ • ~ms., „a ll %. ..,,* p i , .thafet scoutO. co qoults pe.,sfivaw - - ..- - •'• AVAMMlS4 l l l2 oolg,riera s M *rut 5 , 4-« - irk •#:- , ~.... ,s. • . . uloFet ;442 0 4 RE . . ay' be to resist at feel i Vi 4eVilY st /nay' he ack ' • • . • l in - 1 ..-.i ss :.. i , fa i m s "voVAIP I 06 of fk4u "Ch/ ! fa ta l ist 1,4 v. 1.0 4, ;,4 : :44 . : l e ~-, , s r_ . t 4 .. , , iv >se.---1 to teach the people to nay on the cod an . c , .. , . il 1 r I. F