Star. — London, England, 1816-12-07 00:00:00

lute the imputations,. Mr. Merceron might with justice have been held ar,worthy of his station as a Magistrate, and of his office as treasurer. He should proceed to prove the ,eedful facts, regretting that these unhappy differences had ever commencedomd that a Court of Justice should be disgusted with their repetition. The parish clerk proved that he had read these libels in the church, after mornings ervice was over, by the direction of M r. King, who had previously informed hits, that he had received them from some of the parishioners, with a request that they should be given out amongst the usual parish notices read in church after the publication of banns. Mr. DeNistaN end Mr. STARKIE appeared as Coun sel for the dt fendants ; and the course of defence suggested was, that the publication of these notices is: church, was the legitimate and ordinary mode of calling together the parishioners for the purpose of discussing paroci)ial matters ; and for this, they cited Bart's Eccle.iastical Law, which expressly laid down this as the proper mr.l: of publication, it being re-' quisite that the object of the requited, meeting should be expressly and distinctly announced in the notice. Lord Extatealaounit concturei in the propriety of the rule so hid down ; but expressed his belief, that the learned writer referred to, did not go un to add, that the notices so published might legally be the ve hicles of defamatory matter. It was impossible to carry the doctrine to that exsent. Had the notices in question been published merely in the presence of Vestrymen, and not publicly in church, when stran gers to the parish were assembled, perhaps a greater latitude of expression might be allowed than would be tolerated in a notice given out to a mixed congre. gation. It was probable that the signers of these requisitions had a very laudable object in view, but in their zeal to attain their purpose, they had over. stepped the line of prudence, and had used language which, in point of law, was illegal. With the merits of the case, the Court, in this stage of the proceed ing, had nothing to do. However, his Lordship thought, considering the delicacy of the situation in which all parties were placed, that it was a prosecu. tion which would not answer any useful purpose by being persevered in, and he therefore asked the At torney General whether his client wished to proceed! The ATTORNEY GENF.RAL, after communicating with Mr ? Merceron, said, that this was a matter which he referred to his client's own judgment, as he (the Attorney General) considered himself as the =ere advocate on the occasion. The case then proceeded, and the signatures of the other defendants being proved, Mr. DENMAN said, that after Lotd Ellenborough's opinion, he should not go to the Jury, but reserve the case of the defendants, with a view to mitigation, if the prosecutor should move for judgment. Lord ELLENDOROLIGH then proceeded to address the Jury, and observed, the defendant's Counsel had acted most judiciously in the course they had adopted. It appeared in this case, that the defendants wen persons of great respectability, though they bad thus imprudently committed themselves. They had certainly a legal right to call a Vestry, and to discuss the expenditure of the parish money.— There were also many other matters of great impor tance contained in the notices which had been read, and for the consideration of which it was highly ne cessary a Vestry Meeting should have been called ; but though there was much very proper matter con tained in the notices, there was much also of a very improper nature mixed up with it—calumnious, li bellous, and highly improper to be promulgated in a place of worship, and at such a time as this publica tion was made. They had certainly overstepped the bounds of the law ; and as such, were subject to have a verdict passed against them. AU which the Jury had now to do, was to return a verdict of Guilty or Not Guilty The mitigatory circumstances would be taken into consideration by the Court, whenever it should be thought proper by the prosecutor to bring them up for judgment, should the Jury find them guilty. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty against all the defendants. CONSISTORY COURT, DECEMBER 6. bTROLJD V. STROUD. This was a cause of nullity of marriage, promoted by Isabella Fisher, otherwise Stroud, against J. Stroud, her husband, by reason of minority. The marriage took place by licence, at Stepney Church, on the 94th of June, 1812. It appeared that the wife was only 19 years of age at the time, and that it was without the knowledge of her father, and the same was kept a secret from him for a year after. l wards. It was admitted by Counsel, on the part of Mr. Stroud, that the fact of the marriage could not be denied ; but contended there was a want of proof of identity of the husband. Sir WILLIM4 SCOTT .was however, clearly of opinion t hat the minority, tit; want of consent, and the identity of the parties, wen, fully proved, and accordingly pronounced the mar-1 riage null and void. COCKPIT, DECEMBER S. The Julian, Moloany master.—T vessel, with a cargo of timber, proteoded.ao Trinidad ; there sold the same, took in a cargo of molasses, and on her re turn to Penobscot, touched at Porto Rico, to take in Spanish papers ; and afterwards, as she was proceed. ing to Boston, being in a state of distress, she put into Bermuda, and was there seized, on the 18th of January, 1814, by. the Deputy Marshal of the Court; and the Vice Admiralty Court of that island con demneaec d her. From which sentence au appeal was priuted to this Court. Their Lordships affirmed the sentence. The Sea Polly, Rowell master.—This was the case of an American ship,. laden with flour-and tar, which sailed from Wilmington in St. John's, New Brunswick, and, in the-prosecution of that voyage, was captured on the Bth of July, 1814, by his Maps. ty's ship Lacedemonian, and carried to Bermuda, where the was condemned, on the ground of a breach of blockade. Their Lordships restored the properly as claimed, subject to the captors' expenses up to a • certain period. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. ER JOHN FLOYD V. xxxxcaut, irSQ. This action was upon the warranty of a hone. The plaintiff, General Floyd, being in want of a horse, employed Captain Serie, a friend, to purchase one for • him. Captain Serie bad beard that the defendant, a - ginitlemaa of fortune. in Devonshire, then inLondon , 'Soria about to sell a horse that would suit the purpose 1 1 1 , • . of the plaintiff t to Lord . thniclAL Captain Berle accordingly waited upon the deftsdent, and bought the animal for 100 guineas e ho'had•previowly tried hint, and found that. he had a slight cough, which he understood was , occasioned by exposure in a straw yard, and Was merely temporary. On the 13th May the horse was delivered with a warrawy of soundness to Gener...l Floyd, who thought him rather ton slight, and found fault with the tough, and a palpitation in the loins,which he thought indicated defectivewind. He in consequence' commissioned Captain Set le to propose to the defendant that the horse should fr 2 re turned, on the ground that he was not :Wet:plate to the weight he had to carry; but nothing was said regard ing the cough until 25th June, some time after the defendant had refused to take the animal back. The horse was subsequently sent to a livery stable, and from thence to Tattersail's, where he was sold for 22 guineas. For this sum credit was given by the plaintiff, whose demand, including all expenses, was £9U. 6 , . Mr. SCARLETT, on the part of the plaintiff, said that this was one of the very hew horse causes in which no fraud was imputed to either side: the question merely was, whether the horse, at the time of sale, was, or was not, sound, the defendant having given a war ranty that be had no defect. He then called Captain Serle, who deposed to the w;irranty and to the other circumstances of the transaction. The plaintiff bad proposed to return the horse to the defendant, ant would have been content - to have lost ten or twenty pounds, because be did not wish to have any dispute on the subject of the cough. Several witnesses, among whom was Mr. Field, the veterinary surgeon, gave evidence of the unsoundness of the horse. Mr. GURNEY, for the defendant, argued from the conduct of the plaintiff, in not returning the horse', earlier, and in not communicating the fact of bison. soundness to the defendant before the 25th of June, that the horse was not in fact unsound at the time of the sale.—The Jury found a verdict lorthe £'9O. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. Yesterday Wilhons Andersen was put to the bar, charged on an indictment with the wilfel murder of John Levy, in the parish of Clerkenwell. Mr. ANDREWS, on the part of the prosecution, put in an affidavit for the postponement of the trial, upon the ground that, although the utmost vigilance had been exercised to obtain the attendance of a very ma terial witness, it had been found ineffectual. Mr. CURWOOD objected, on the part of the prim ner, to the postponement, unless it could be restricted to the present Sessions. Mr. Asioaxws replied, that in all human probabi lity, they would be enabled to procure the mien dance of the witness alluded to by Monday or Tues. day.—The trial was ordered to stand over till Tues day morning. George Well:, Willijm Smith, and Maw Quinlaff,l were indicted for feloniously and burglariously break ing and entering the dwelling-house of Charles Cholm ley, Esq. and stealing therefrom five feather-beds, four carpets, some chairs, tables, and several other articles of household furniture, on the night of the 21st of November. Mr. ARABIN stilted the case to the Jury. The first witness called was Charles Chnlntley, Esq.—Resides at No. 4, Cleveland-square ; abbot June last left his house in town to go into the coun try. fie left the keys with his servant, with direc tions to take care of the premises. A Mrs. French got the keys from the servant. In consequence of seme information which he received from Mrs. French he returned to town. On examining the house, he found he had been robbed to the value of about £3OO. Mrs. French was the wife of French, the waiter at the Clarendon Hotel; got the keys of the house from Mr. Cholmley's servant ; was in the habit of ring to the house to see if all was right; went there on the 21st of November; discovered that the house had been robbed of all the beds, bed furniture, car pets, pier glasses, and several other articles. Her husband also saw that the house had been robbed. — In consequence of this, a watch had been set in order to discover the robbers. When she went first alter the robbery, a table was lying in the drawing-room, some chairs in the parlour, and some silk was on the bookcase in the second Poor. She was stationed with another person to watch before the door that evening. She went about half - past five, walked up and down before the house, and the first person she saw was Smith (one of the prisoners) walking near , it. He went away, and came up soon after, and went to the street door of Mr. Cholmley's house, and ,made a short stop there. The next person she saw was a man dressed as a porter, and carrying a porter's knot ; he wore a light coloured coat and a green baize apron. She saw him walk by the Margins of Stafford's stable, which ccmes round by Mr. Cholns ley's house. She left her husband and another watch ing, went for the key, and when she returned the door was broken open by Nichols (the Officer who had been sent to watch). When she entered the house, she found the table in the hall, which she had seen in the drawing-room in the morning ; she also found the chairs packed up andaome furniture cotton which had been in the second floor, was tied up in a bag. She alto saw a porter's knot on a table in the hall. She saw the three prisoners immediately alter they were taken ,• one of them, Smith, she was cer tain was the person whom she had just before seen walking before the house. She also saw another man in custody, who was dressed like the man whom she had seen with the porter's knot, but she could not positively bay it was the same person. She saw a, soldier who was in the house pick up a dark lantern, which she had not seen there in the morning. Cross-examined.—It was dark when she first saw Smith walking opposite the house. His back was turned to her at first, but she afterwards saw his face. He was then a stranger to her. She recognized him afterwards as the same person, but she knew him more by his height and clothes than by his face. • George French, the husband of the last witness, corroborated the statement of his wife, and' added, that on discovering the robbery, he went to Bow. street, from , whence Nichols, the Officer, came to' him, and they proceeded to examine the house.—' When he was at the house in the morning, he saw the furniture as described by last witness.' He left the house in the same state in which he found it. In the evening be went with Nichols to the houses. sus pecting that some persons were within, Nichols went for assistance, and returned with some soldiers. Witness gave Nichols the key, which he applied to • - the lock, bet he foiled that it Wig fattiSt4 Ira) . the or inside. eed it Nichols, with as described thlssistfeanutceituofeethe soldrrs, fo fou nd by last witness. Quinlan (one of th e prisoners) had so me silk in his posses sioo. William Nichols, the Bow-street officer, stated, that in consequence of the application made at the office, he went with last witness to examine the house. He left it in the same state in which he found it. -- The doors and windows were fast. In t he evening he went to watch the place about five o'clock—he silt Smith, and soon after he saws ells and Quin lan ; Wells had a p orter's knot. ithwent up to the door of Mr. C.'s house ; witness could not see distinctly what he did there; but he (Smith) left 'them in a short time, and came towards the place where witness stood. At the same time the two other prisoners crossed over towards the house. Wit less then ran away, lest Smith should see and know him as an officer. He, witness, went round by ano ther way, and saw Smith and followed him. When 'he came up he asked him, Smith, where he had been,- and what he had been doing ? to which he re plied be had just come from Westminster, where he had been drinking with some Noir, and begged witness not to tell his wife. Witness then took him into custody, and searched him. Nothing particular was found upon him. Witness then returned, and having got some persons to desist him, he stationed them at each side of the house, and told them not to make a noise, for at this time he supposed some per sons had got into the house. While watching, they saw the door of thehouse opened and then shut again. He then went to the door and applied the key to open it, but at that moment he heard a bolt drawn on t'ie inside, which fastened it, and immediately atter he heard a noise as of some persons running up stairs. He then forced the door and followed head I, stairs. He went to the garret, ' from which he the people in the street cry out that the robbers were escaping by the top of the house—be got out on the leads and went on the cop of the next house, where he saw Quinlan, and took him into custody. Wit ness asked him where the other person who had been with him was to which he replied, 66 I must not tell, find him yourself." In a short time after he aw Wells, and told one of the soldieri to take him into custody, which he immediately did: Quinlan then said, " Come, don't pull us about so; we will go with you, Nicholls; we must answer for what we have done." Quinlan was then examined, and a piece of silk found in his hat. Thomas Willett corroborated this evidence, Peter Ashworth was the soldier who apprehended Wells. He took him behind a chimney, on the top ot the house. Mrs. French was again called, and identified the silk found en Quinlan as that she had seen in the enie morning.—Here the case closed for the prosecution. Wells and Quinlan both dd any knowledge of the facts alledged against them. Smith said that he was going peaceably home when he was arrested .by Nicholls, more than 150 yards from the place where the robbery was corn. witted. fie knew nothing of the alleged robbery. Mr. Baron RICUARDS summed up. He observed, that however uriliertunate it might be for the priso• ners at the bar, he was afraid no rational doubt could exist respecting their being concerned in this nefarious transaction. Should the Jury find the burglary doubtful, they might acquit the prisoners of that part ot the charge ; but he believed it impassible to acquit them on the second count. They would, however, exercise their own judgment, and he had no doubt 'tat their verdict would be founded in the strictest justice. After consulting a few minutes, the Jury found the prisoners guilty of the burglary—. Death. After the verdict, Nichols. the officer, stated to the Court, that Wells and Quilan had acted with great forbearance to him while on the house, as they might easily have thrown him into the street. They were good-looking men and very well dres sed, and conducted themselves throughout the trial with the greatest, decorum.—Wells is 35 years of age, Smith 29, and Quinlan 2.5. The following were also capitally convicted : France: Newland and Ann A['Dmrgall, for stealing a quantity of printed cotton and Irish linen. the pi 0. perry of William Spooner, privately in his shop. Mamas Gibbias, for stealing . a pair of sheets and a pair of blankets, and other articles, of Ann Wheeler, is her dwelling house, and afterwards burglariously breaking the same to get out. Monday last, Catherine Canty, who lived for nine years as cook in the house of the late Colonel NEW saw, at Newberry How, near Mallow, was lodged in Cork jail, for being privy to her master's murder, the particulars of which appeared in this Paper of Thursday se'nnight. QUERN•SQUARE• ••••• HACKWET•COACHNI •••••CaPiain Finch, of the Life Guards, appeared to answer the summons of John Rickey, driver of the hackney. coach No. 1173, for refusing to pay his full fare.— Complainant stated, that he was called. from the stand in Knightsbridge, to go to the barracks, where he took up the Captain, and drove him to York-place, Queen's Elm, where be, put him 'down at his own door. His fare was 21. and be was entitled to back money, which made it Ss. The defendant said, his reason for refusing kipay this demand was, that he had been carried from the barracks to his own house Several times, .and none of the coachmen had asked him more than The Magistrate (W. Fielding, Esq.) infOrmed Captain Finch, that nothing could be more fallacious than judging of the real amount of a fare by taking it at what others might have char ged. It certainly Wits not customary for them to charge too little, bttt Many of them did so from not knowing the ground exactly, and from the fear of being summoned, if they demanded too much ; and though he (the Captain) had been taken for Is. 6J. more than three or fonr times, yet an espy:kneed whip like the plaintiff knew his ground to an inch, and his fare to a fitthing. As to the complainant agreeing to take 18d. the Act of Parliament itself set that aside, by not allowing them to make any bargain. As defendant bad been carried further into the country; though the coach was originally taken off the stones, yet that circumstance of going further from tows entitled the driver to back money, as it was called. He must therefore adjudge Cap tain Finch to pay the other 18d. and the costs, which he did' ituatediately. • - ;7. . nu MAR KITS. tiEWCIATZ AND LEAD=LL ) MARKITS, DEC. G. (By the Carcass. Beef, Cr T stone Its Od to Ss 4d ( Veal ft 8d to 5, o! Mutton . ses 4d to 36 64 I Purk 44 0! to 51 0i PRICLS OV HAY ARIL) o 1 ItAW ST. JAMES ' S. Hay 31 IO Od to el Os 0(1 Hay 51 o. 61 es Straw 11 123 Od to 21 5s 0.1 I Straw 11 15. to 21 4s Clover, 7L Os. Od. to 01. Os. --- 11;t10E OF HOPs. ----- 11EW BAGS. NEW tOCILITs. 91 9s to Ist Os ' Kent - 111 Its to 171 is 91 Os to 191 Os busses 111 Os to 151 14 111 Os to 161 Os Farnham 181 04 to 231 $ Kent Sussex RAW IDES. Best Heifers sod Steen (per stone) • 2s ltd to Ss 01 Middling% its 04 to 2% 61 Sheepskins—PoUed, 4s od. to Ordinary is ed to Is um Market Calf h. rack ling. Horse lOs tl to eh IS 'id.—Downs 3s 4d to 43 Ot PRICE O! St. James's Market ss 4d Clare Market - S Whitt-chapel Market Ss 31 pet stone of 81b. Yellow Soap, 86s--Mottled, Candles per dna. los rALLOVf: ----- 7' 1 I'own Tallow S's Yei lw lis.ssia Ms 1 White ditto COI I Soap ditt,) SSs , i i , 946—',:ut1,96s—Palm, Slss ud—Nl*Jlclo, 11s 6.: 'IRICE OF LEATHEit IN L.EA Dl', NH.tl.l.- i I'ItLE is... Butts, So to 56115 s I9d 22 Lail Skim, 3i to 4e::). i1.',14 I . Ditto, 54 to 661b 1 Y4tl 00d Litto 50 to 70Ibs 20 ,1 44 m a d am , B a cke ood 00.1 Ditto 70 to er.bq 20a ii , l D ress ing Hideq 13td tEd 1 SraallSealii Grfttikild '.:44;ti Fine Coach Hideo lind 17 id Large darn, per d t is so+ iog s. COAL MARKE r, lltCEMbEit 6 Ships at Market. Ships sold. prim 75 Nesvca.tle 17 395. 6d. to tts. M. 19 Sunderland 10 355. 6d. to 4la 46 1 Scotch Coal 1 40s. Od to Cs. 4 1 WAD Coal 0 SiOs. COON FRY MARKE rs, ke. Uziamot, Dec. 5. —Wheat per load, LOU 000 to IN ee. New ditto. ill 05 to 111 Os. Barley, per quarter Ms ce iea eats tis to 444. Beans 364. to 70s. Old Beam OM to me. peas 445 to 565. Rye 00s to nOs. °sumo, December s—Price of a bushel of wheat 12% all 7d. halfpenny ; Price of the Quarters Loaf, whence, Wousehold, Is. Id. halfpenny. BASIIIIIT, Dee. 5.--Wheat 41.6 d. to 15...6d a bushel. Flout i4s. 90e. per sack. Bread is. 4d. the half peck. Nawouar, liaags—Wneat 54s to 11145 Barley its to 7ds 06 Oats 195 to 465. Beans 645 to 705, Peas 001 to St.. DUILIN, Dec. 4.—The Corn Market, on Friday, as might be expected, felt the influence of the great rise which had tales place in London Wheat was to be had from 30s to 70s; end Old What 110* New Oats from 19s to 241; Old Oats 27s tole; Barley front 25s to .155. Ernst —Wheat from 8s to 105 6d; Barley els to les; Oats is to 35 9.1; Pease 8s to 9s. Yuma., Nov. t9—Wheat (per bushel) new, 104 to lb; old, 15e 6d to 175; Barley 6s to 75; Making 6d ; Oan, new, Ss 941; old 45 to ss; Beans, 8s 6d to 10.; Whi , e Pease, los es 12s; coloured 6s; Good Flour 1001 to 105 e per tack; Bread, Is 4d the quartern loaf. Bairroi., Nov SO.—Wheat 156 to 165; Barley 7s to 7s 3d; Beans, 75 to 9s; Oats, us ad to 55; Malt, 95 to 51s per bend; Flour 965 to lOos per bag. SALISZORT, Dec. 3 —Wheat 921 he 96e; Batley sot Mak; Oats 28s to 40s; Beano 60s to 78s; Floor Ofs; Bread h 6d. WARIIINsTaa, Nov. 30—Wheat, pus to 139 s ; Barley Ns es 7054 Oats 285 to 445; Beans 645 to 7als. Divests. Nov. 98—W heat 561 to 1365; Barley Us to 70s. Set s aaoa Nc, Nov. 30—Wheat 96s to 1205; Barley Note 7el. .I . AUNTON, Nov. SO—Wheat 145 6d to 141 per both& • COURSE OF EXCIL Amsterdam 40 413.20. Ditto at sight 39 10 Amsterdam 12 7 C. F. Ditto at sight 12 4 Rotterdam 12 8 2U. ,NGE, YESTERDAY. Barr.:lona 00 Bill:ilia 35 St. Sebagian Oli iGibraltar 31 Ltzhorn, 4 Genoa, 45 [ Venice,n.C. Liv.Picak Antwerp 12 7 Han:bores ST 2 2iU. Altona 37 S 2W. Paris 1 day's date 25 SO Ditto 26 0 4'J. r. our deatis 26 00 irarlion on the Main 154 ex Mo. Madrid 34 eifee!ve Cadiz 34} effective ineffective per l.ste3 s; GO I Nialto 46 Int 14 1; . al a i : b ern i : 9 1 : 1 4:,11 4 ( 1 pe s t 4. Oporto. 551 Rio Janeiro 9 Dublin, VA' Cork, 101 Holland 2 per Cent. 'ED. 34 Agin of the Bank on MAREU Monday, at Park, Frederick Grey Cooper, Eq. hit 1-ii• tenant-Colonel in the FiVt. Regime in of Fan ( untie, to tomlia Sophia, valet of the late Colonel Wheet,of Liar t (owe, iutt.e county of SontersEt. • PAICE OF S'S'OCKS I'ESIiROAIf. Bank Stock , Radii& Stel -- 3 per Ct. Red. 64 /it Luba Ecruli W 17 P 1 Ditto Cons.— Imp. At 111.••••• 4 per Ceuta. 78iii • Exc6.2eiurr'Fifis 5 11 fr. Cons. Itlr ace. t ic tii i 5 per Cent. Navy Ldog Anna. 16.115-14 Lour: y Ti.•:kets .1 , ...1$ ISt Si quid :waist" reetins is s Candidus Imperil, al non his utere meeunisisttot. To regtilate the human passions, not lo thentl to ; live them a proper direction and a doe ranch• stead of vainly atteme•ing to cradicaie thin from our name, d foolishly and impiously pretending to divert them into new etc* nels—is the husinen - ; of a rationet diested by cepts of the purest Religion, and countenanced by the tot the s:W r.rr oo of the soundest philusophy. It is unnece.sirv. after all tea be brew written MI -Ct, 4;r:crstor th- symptom; which to dicate those &ceases that :te brought upon the human baily mind by indulging to excess if, sexual pleasures, and panicula l t by prrseverit.g in a pereicious h..htt too often acquired a: f:cltrol It more concern the private ha,spiness of individual; led rhe .general prosperity ~f the country. to atatonnce totto. final a long and extensive practice in this particular brit:at! the Proteselon, we can with the I , reattst confidence eisioe tt! Parents and Guardians of Youth, and those persons who 14 1 6 , ;: under a general or partial debility and deraegemcioe of th NE itiou6 SYSTEM, whether produced by this habit, by tauten SeruixtVre Infection, by intemperate living, or redolence in h 47 Minutes, by intense application to study, by intmoderatei a le or by excesles of any kind, that we ha ve it in our power an ent;rely new molt d of cure, without the smallest tee Ivlcttcntcr, * which In all the varieties soil in all the r tiieesc:::te s complai.:ta, has contitined to answer the must sangutue 'lit:" lions of Paiier ts of both Sores. I. The et:trio rim ss and anxiety with which the work! bit leaked tor so great a desideratum in the comforts ard ioqtrier ntents of a polished and en li g ht e ned age, as tbar of men sl talents, and integrity, d..-ac.rittg thereseteee etch;4ivey to , la 4 aisrame, is eviLeed by the eater applications !or advice a' 'd" dittoes which we are daily receiving from e very gusrter apt elf wor4d. In sligh t and seceut tens oftSy phylitic Intecdun, feet cure is completed in the short period or t days; ant tb~ of the utmost inveteracy, where other Pracr.tiouers Lave a proper perseverance In our Van of treat ment, restarts fs patient a safe and radical cure. Strictures of the Urethra, fr. " ten to twenty years duration, are by our superior m edia,: of : permanently removed in the course of three weeks. . b ;re CwiPatients of either sex may consult us with the grates. secrecy, and delicacy, at uur hem; No. 11 , 7, Het. n Parietiss in the cointtry. dr•cribing the nature of their caisstro, inciosing a remittance tor advice and medicin es, the sole sent to aU parts of the wallet. CURRIE mid CO, Sure .. . 4* No. 10;7, tiitttti.Onimio N. B. The above important disr.wery is R.O :!s. cure of and Debility, was matured by Dr. C t a XIE, ill ilk tt: ir t hrough FRANCS., NAPLES, alit! :**llF,l;ortt trhsnl:' just returned with some highly itaer .etiog and falp,lrtal.o u v c. vetting the present state i. l a;cd,..latut v rro:ce .. _1 a Continent, which he is prol.wing to. lay It :te re the t e.!raz -; 1, treatise on these complaints, end w hich he tripes to he ab le :w weeks to publish. HIGH WATER TO MORROW Al' LINLM 4 Morntag 112 Inn" fter 4 4 Afternoon - • IA) NOUN - Prayed tar Laval. r, Pablisktil dole, 'sad ot tlat.Star-421cei "OP /W.l NI 1111 A Mr we ?~ Im AI Ika as t tz I Li V 11 G .1 I I