Star. — London, England, 1819-03-13 00:00:00

IF V 14. I'l l 4 1 ; I I . :A y. ' 1 , I t !: 7\ I L• tit , r. I ~~ EDINBURGH 'NISSI.NARY SOCIETY. THE PUBLIC are respectfully informed that a Meeting is to be held in the City of Landon Livern, on Tuasilay next the ltith instant, for the purpose of forming a Corresponding Committee in this Metropolk, to the Fdinburgh Missionary Society, whose exc.' tiara for diffusing the Gospel in Russian Tartary are peculiarly cousteuanced by his Imperial Majesty Alexander. Cnwassa GILANT, Sen. Eq. will take the Chair precisely et Twelve o'Clook ; and certain Resolutiors will be moved in con nection with the object, n hioli it is hoped will interest the friends of this Institution and of Missions in general PARLIAMEIVT - ARY PROC,EADINGS. DOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH 12. The Earl of ROSSLYN presented a Petition from Gide borough, in thl North Riding of Yorkshire, praying for a Re vision of the Mal Code. Lord (RA hiTLEY presentea a Petition from the Mayor, Corporation, and Inhabitants of tie Borougb of Guildford, in the County of Surrey, to a similar effect. Mr. S. 13ovana and others, brought up the Poor's T.atvs Amendment Bill from the Cowmons, which Was toad the first time, and ordered to bo printed. Earl GROSVENOR. in reference to certain Petitions which were brought forward yesterday, respecting a Non-extension of the Poor's Rates to Lead and certain other Mines, observed that a false impression on the subject was endeavoured to be made by those vrlie petitioned. Their Lordships must, he thought, be aware, that the mints to which he alluded, were very dif ferently circumstanced from other mines, inasmuch as there was no visible property of a taxable nature, and that every thing turned upon the success of the undertakings. Ile repeated there w-as no tisible property, and he mast say, that he 0: might it ra ther an ungrateful part in those who so attempted to,come for ward. By such a procedure as seemed to be contemplated by those persons, a great injury may i ke suffered by mines of the de scription referred to; and he obkrved, that as far as he knew. the Poor's Rates had not been increased as stated. lie thought ft but right not to let such allegations go unnoticed. Lord BEDESDALE presented a Petition from a nuriher of Debtors croihncyd ht the King's_ Bench Prison, against the dia.. contisaanee of the Insolvent Debtors' Act. Earl BEAT CIIA M P presented a Petition frcm the T.• !tot; of the City, and County of the City of Coventry, pr.e.ing that no alteration may be made in the Duties upon Inland Coals. Lotd AUCK L A NI) presented a Petition frori the City of Drechin, in Scotland, praying for a Reform in the mode of elect ing the Magistracy of that City. Eatl BATIIIIitsT presented a Petition from the Borough of Cirencester, in Gloucestershire, praying a Revision in the Code. _ Viscount IVIELVII.LE presented a ntition on :ht. part d.f the Collieries in Scotland, praying th::: no Tax may he irnrised on these Coals. The Petitioners alleged el.: a Tar thereon would be equally- ruinous and unjust : ruinous, aa to its effects on various manufacture; in that country• ; and unjust, as Scots Coals Wet not sent to the London 3/arket. _ Viscount tiIItMOVITII laid upon the table, by command of his Royal IlighnetA the Prince Regent, a variety of further Documents respecting the State of Prisons, especially those of Ireland. A Private Bill was brought up from the Commons by Mr. Joscen Prrr, and read the first time.• The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a Petition from the Corporation and a number of Inhabitants of the City of Norwich, praying that measures might be taken for establishing two Jail Deliveries in the year in that city; and setting forth some injuious and oppressive consequences which there resulted tram the want of such a regulation. The Noble Marquis also presented two other Petitlors . front the Corporaeisn of Clainsenhaen, in the County of Wilts ; and the second, (torn Bridge Ward, in the City of London, against the continuance of the Insolvent Debtors Act.—TAie Petitions were severally ord:red to lie on the table.—Ajourned till 'Monday. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. LITTLETON presented a Petition front the Inhabi tants of Skipton, agsint.t the equalizatibn of the Duties on Coals. Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. HUMP. presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Ediaburgh, praying for a Reform in the Royal Scotch Burghs. l'he Pesition he stated to have been voted at a meeting that was askinermsly attended- It was unanimously agreed to. and the same might be said for an the other Petitions which had come or which were about to come before the Howse od this subject. In this instance a rational reform was called for, which ail felt to be necestary, and which he should hope it would be thought wise to concede to the wishes of the Peutioners—The Petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mt. S. BOURNE postponed the Motion of which hrt hr.d given notice, re petting the Poor's Settlentot 111, tiff Thursday the 11.5 th Instant. _ _ A Petition was presented from 'Fain, praying for a Rao, in in the Royal Burghs of Scotland.—Ordered to lie cm the table. A Petition was presented from the inhabitants of Brisigemorth, praying that there may be no alteration in the Coal Duties.— Ordered to he on the table: CURWEN presented s. Petition from the IMe‘bitants of Workington, playing that the Duties on Coals ma 7 not be extended to them. They had no wish that these ditties sheuld press heavy o. others. All they required was, that that rater). sivn of die duties which had been oniinenderl should net take plate.—'lle Petition was ordered • he printed. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR presented a Petition front the Inhabi tants of Martin in the Fields, praying that the Insolvent I)ebrors' bill may not be renewed. A sul.),rription, he thought it right to state, had been set on foot by thest. Petitioners to corer the expetetes of this appliration to Parliament ; and so far were they trout wishing to press hard on poor Debtor.. that a surplus which remained after defraying their necessary expenses, they had actually sent to the. Society for relieving persons in confinetnent for small debts.—Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. 11. DAVIS pecgotitcd Petitions frpm the Mayor, Alder tu^n, and Common Council of Bristol, It. , .ainst the reorvnil of the biselvent Debtors Act, and a•-aii.st the equalization of the Coal itutiee:—Or.lerel! tet lie on th e' rible. Mr. Alderman WOOD preset.red a Petition from Bridport, praying for an equalization of the Duties or. Cr..as.--Ordered to he on the table. • Mr. DAVENPORT presented a Petition irom the Manu factltrers of Salt in the Comics of Cheshire and Lancashire, praying that no alteration should take place in !he Duties on Coal., and not fur an alteration of the Salt Duties, as represented by mistake in the Papers of yesterday. Mr. LYTTLETON -presented Petitions from Baylen, in Salop, and from th 4 Town of Ross, in lierefordshire, in favour of n revision of the Criminal Code.—Ordered to lic on the table. Ile then presented two Petitions from Stourbridge, and an 'either place in Woreestersidre, in the co•taty nF Wt.rcester, pray ing that no alteration may be made in the Coal Duties. The Honourable Siemher also presente-I a Petition from the Inhabitants of Stcurbridge, Ilainst the renewal of the Insolvent Debtors Act.—Theic Petitions wire ordered to lie on the table. Mr. Alderman TIIORP presented a Petition from tke Vat of Aldgate, praying for an equalization of the Duties nn Coals. Ordered to lie on the table. $I J. NEWPORT presented a Petition from the Catholics of the flaunty and City' of Waterford, complaining of the stye. ; city of the Statutes affertiag the ROMILII Catholics of Ireland, and chewing that these, enzeted at a time when the Ci.wernment was new and unsettled, were ro longer Lecessarynow, and ought to be repealed.—The Petition was read, ordered to'lie on the table, and to be printed. • On the motion of 34r. ORBNFELL, further papers relative to the public balances it the hands of the Bank, were ordered to be laid before the liaise. Mr. S. WORTLEY presonted Petitions from Ituddersfieid, agair,st the renevral of the Insolvent Debtors' Art, and against the propored alteration of the Coal Duties.—Ordeted to lie on the table. Mr. BROUGHAM presented a Petition from terrain per sons cont. :1.4 in the Fleet Prison, not in favour of the Insolvent Debtors' Bill ; but praying, that before it was itiered to expire an tatiuiry might' take plac► it:to the state of the law, as it af f:ctori creditors and debtors.-i-Ordered to be printed. r i lessage from the Lords announced their Lordship , : assent to the Smugglers' Apprehension Reward till, and other .Bills, (foe which see the Lords.; NEWGA Tt. The Sheriffs of the City of London presented a Pe tition horst the Lord Jtayor, Arderrnerl, and Common • Council of London, on the present crowded state of N ewsa tc, arising out o the cncamstauce of mall), of the County of Middlesex offenders being sent to , the City prison,_ to be confined and maintained at th e expense of the City, and praying that the case might be referred to the Committee on the State of Prisons.. Mr. Alderman WOOD said, the Petitioners did , not complain so much of the expense thrown upon the City of London, by their being compelled to main tain the prisoners of the. County of Middlesex (though that created an annual expense of 5 or 6001.) as of the crowded state of their jails, from the number of Middlesex o ff enders committed to them. At that moment there were in Newgatc 4 , 7 prisoners, under , sentence of death, and there were only fifteen cells to contain them. The sixteen prisoners sent to New gate from Clerkenwell, who had been convicted of unnatural offences, were, it was known, confined in one room. It had been in contemplation to put them in these cells, but had this been done, there would, have been no fit place to receive those who were under sentence of death. There was no room for the accommodation of State Prisoners. Those who might be committed by that Ilouse, could not . be kept by themselves ; they must, of necessity, be permitted to mix with felons. Ilc hoped the prayer of the Peti tion would be granted, and that it would be referred to the Committee on the state of Jails. Mr. WILBERFORCE thought it was impossible for the House to lend a deaf ear to statements like those which they had just heard. Adverting to the fact alluded to by the last speaker, of sixteen persons conimitted of certain practices being confined in one room, he asked if it was to be endured that such persons should be so kept together, while they, suf fering all this talked of such offenders being confined by public wisdom and public 4 justice / Some re-' • medy or other ought to be .applied without loss of time. He could wish the Petition referred to a se parate Committee, in the hope that some immediate remedy might be supplied, if it were only of a tem porary nature, before the result of the deliberations of the other Committee could be ascertained. Mr. Alderman WOOD said, every effort had been made to prevent that which he had mentioned, but in the present state of Newgate, it had been found impossible to make a better arrangement than that which had been mentioned. Mr. BROUGHAM was sorry that such a Petition as that which had just been brought up should have hen: presented, as he was sure that nothing but the rnoq imperious necessity could justify the City of London in sending it to that House. In the first place thee, he must take it for granted, that the City of London had not the means of removing the evil themselves. Had it been otherwise, they could never have thought of troubling the House on the subject, but being utterly destitute, they of necessity had been reduced to the most lamentable alternative of attempting to force the task of removing the evil complained of on the country. That the City had! it not in their pow:•er, notwithstanding the funds at their command, to alter Newgate so as to make it furnish the requisite accommodation, he could not but suppose they had ascertained, by inquiry n:ade, for he would not believe that they had had recourse to the desperate expedient (soch he must scan it) of provoking a discussion on this question, till an in quiry, after the means of doing without it, had been made, and had failed. As the matter was now be fore them, the course recommended by the Member for Bramber seemed to be that which it would be most proper to take. Not only was it the most ex• pedient ; but it was the only one they could with pro priety adopt. Since it had come to them, they must deal with it, and the sooner they did so the better. Mr. Alderman WOOD, in explanation, repeated part of his former stateingnt, to shew that it was im pot:sible to make a better arrangement in Newgate than that which had actually been made. The punish ment of the pillory having been discontinued since he had exposed certain offenders some 'years ago in' the Haymarket, they were now sentenced to impri sllnment in Newgate. The whole fault lay with the Magistrates who sent thorn to the City prison for rise offences they had committed in the County of `•liddlescx.—Petition ordered to lie on the table. CASE OF MIL WYNDHAM QUIN Sir ROBERT WILSON moved the Order of the Day should be read for resuming the loquiry into the matter of the Petition against Mr. W. Quin. Mr. GEORGE MArlsrt.t. (father-in-law to the Peti tioner, and one of Mr. Qurv's relations) was then called in and examined. Mr. STUART WOItTLEY (while the examina tion of Mr. Mazsell was going oni rose and said, that to prevent any Mistake as to what he had said last respecting the publication of the evidence in this case, he wished it to be distinctly understood, that he ould consider the publication of any part' of that evidence, before the whole was concluded, as breach of the privileges of the House. If any part of the evidence was printed before the examinations were concluded, it was to be considered as solely for the use of Members of the House, and he should consider any partial publication of parts so printed as a breach of privilege. This; of course, was not to be understood as extending to the publication of the Minutes, as printed for the use cf the House, when the whole wcre complete. After the next witness, Mr. Daniel Gabbett, had withdrawn, Mr. WYNN, referring to what had passed last night, asked Mr. Windham Quin if he wished, in the present in§tance, to disclaim all protection of com munications made in professional confidence? If the Honourable Member objected, he apprehended tEat the House would not receive such evidence. hfr. W. have nothing to conceal in these transactions ; and for Gods sake let them be sifted thoroughly to-thebottom. BREACII OF PRIVILEGP. The examination of Mr.. Richard Stnith and Mr. Carew Smyth was continued till nearly eleven o'clock. ,when it was interrupted by the Idle Acing proceeding : Sir GEORGE HILL said, that he rose in order to move that a witness, formerly examined, Mt. Gould, be called in, and examined ag to a question of privi lege. Ile understood that Mr. Gould had receiv"d a threat as to the manner in which he had given his evidence at the 13ar of that House, and in which he might cputiur.e to do so. Ir. Goold was accordingly called in, and thus ex amined by tie SPICALF4I: Have ycn seen Mr, Grady, jun. slue you gave evitcen:e at the t fele ?—f have. • - Did any cone rsation pass betweett y9ul--litere did. • La; was that Conversation I—About a quarter of an hunt ago was in the witnesses room, with several other Gentlemen, when Mr. Grady came to me and said, " Mr. Gould, I wish to speak to you." I' took off my hat with all the respect I could hrhim, and replied that I could not speak to him, as it would be .indelicate while the present inquiry was going on. Ile s.,id he must speak to me, I replied, that if he pe'rsisted so, I must leave the room. These were then precisely his words :—" You have spoken disrespectfully of me in the evidence you gave last night, and if you do so Grain I shall kick you about the streets."—The witness withdrew. Mr. W.. WYNNE thought the only way was to call in Mr. T. W. Grady. He was accordingly called in, and thus examined by the SPEAKER : . Mr. Grady, you had a conversation with a Mr. Gookl, a wi4- nese who was examined at that bar ?—I had.: On what subject, and in what tqms?-1 said, " You have mentioned my name very Wantonly ; if you do so again, I mast take notice of it,"—that is: kick him. Did Mr. GoOld:make any reply ?—None at all. The witnen withdrew, Mr. W. WYNNE moved, that T. W. Grady had, by insulting and threatening a witness befor , ! that House; been guilty of high contempt of that House, and of a gross breach of its privileges. Mr. W. WYNNE next moved, that T. W. Grady should be committed to the custody of . the Serjeant at-Arms. He should have moved his commitment to Newgate at once, but that, during the present in quiry, it seemed necessary that he ?hould he in one of the rooms of the House of Commons—Vicar.) Sir lt. WILSON said, that it was quite manifest to the House that Mr. Grady's conduct proceeded from youth and inexperience—(Heat, /..ca;.)—He considered Mr. Goolds conduct as he had always been accustomed to consider insults—( /leer, laar.)— It must be apparent to the House, from the details already before them, that he was extremely inexpe rienced, a youth of a weak character. lie hoped, therefore, that they would regard with indulgence an indiscretion in which no contempt or breach of pri vilege had been contemplated. Mr. BANKES—The question wasnot what indul gence the youth and inexperience of Mr. Grady might claim, but, what was necessary for the purposes of justice—(llear, hear.) Having said so, it was only necessary to add, that justice squired the protection of an infirm old man—(No, no,)--against the petu lance of a young man, whose indiscretion was so much already laid before the House. The SPEAKER put the question that T. W. Grady having used insults, and having used threats to a wit ness at the bar of the House, respecting the evidence he had already given, and the evidence he should afterwaids give, and having thereby been guilty of high contempt of that House, and of a gross breach of its privileges. be committed to the custody of the Serjeaat at-Arms? The SPE AKER then announced that it was carried ncmine contradieenic. Sir I. COFFIN said that Mr.. Grady's conduct at the bar was an aggravation of his offence. Mr. BROUGHAM said, if he might be excused for the irregularity of speaking after the question had been disposed of in the only manner in which it could be disposed of—( Hear, hear)—be only rose to protest against the construction that had been put on Mr. Grady's conduct at the Bar—(Near, hear) — as an aggravation of his offence. On the contrary, he considered it creditable to him to have in the most manly and frank manner stated conduct that was in itszlf improper--(Hcar, /.ear). Mr. STUART WORTLEY agreed, that he had seen nothing in Mr. Grady's conduct at the Bar to aggravate his Offence—(Hear, hear, hear.) The examir.ation of Mr. CAREW Smvrit was then resumed. After Mr. CARhw had been exa mined, there was a Motion made to call in Mr. T. W. Grady, the Petitioner. Sir ROBERT WILSON opposed this Motion, and submitted to the House that it would be better that the further investigation of the matter should be ad journed, owing to the exhausted state in which the House must be after the long examination to which, they had been listening. Mr. PEEL opposed this proposal, as did also Mr. CANNING. Sir ROBERT WILSON asserted, that his chief reason for postponing any further discussion of the subject for the present was, that be felt that he should net be able to' do justice either to the House, the Petitioner, or the country, in going flintier into' the Petition at that late hour in the evening. A short conversation ensued ensued among seve ral Members, when it was agreed that Mr. T. W. Grady was the next witness who was to be called be • fore the House. . Mr. CANNING said, that it was for the seeuritr 'of a respectable witness that he had coincided with the Honourable Gentleman's Motion regarding the commitment of Mr. I'. W. Grady. Mr. C. W 1 NN said, that as it would be highly inconvenient to send Mr. T. W. Grady to Newgate at that late hour of the night, inasmuch as the Keeper of the Prison would have no accommodations where with to receive him, he should not move that Mr. Grady be committed to the prison in question. The reason why he had proposed the measure that he had done against Mr. Grady, was to prevent the witnes ses who at any future time might be called to give evidence before that House, from being intimidated by the violent conduct of either of the two contend ing parties. Any Gentleman who had been along with him on the Secret Committee appointed to exa mine into the letters of Mr. C. Smyth, would hare seen the impropriety of Mr. Grady's behaviour. The consideration of that impropriety led him to say, that one of the grossest attacks that could be made on the privileges of the House would be to res:mt any thing without its walls that had passed within them—(l/ear, hear). Mr. CALCIt AFT said, that he conceived the gal lant General's object was to protect both parties. Considering that there was no business going forward ion the Inc.rrow, he thought that the further investi gation of the matter was desirable—(Some cries w' " Aa' jo:ien, adjourn !")--Ile bad no objection to young M. Grady's being released from the custody of the Serjeant at Arms. Mr. PEEL said, that when he considered the irti ' tatioa which the Petitioner, who was a young man, was likely to feel from the course which the Petition had taken, and when he considered that snchitrita tion wu, calculated to•prevent that collectedness, of which every man ought to be in possession when examined before that House, he was not inclined to ait with much severity. If some alteration were not made in the condition to which the Petitioner reduCeillimself;' it was -clear, that •he most either. give his evidence in Newgate, cc • e 4e hension of being instantly sent there.-...tk v 1.... The House could not forget th at t h e father . sent there.—(hear, hear).—lle theught ti consequences could ensue from the tlischar,, T.W. (Lady being ordevcd b) that Howe." Mr. C. W. WYNN had no objection to being sl.ewn to the Petitiener, if he Wculj assurance not to repeat the same offence it Mr. PEEL then moved, that Mr. T. should be released from the custody of dr: at-Arms. bird C. CHURCHILL said, that he T.W. Wady to be admonished, sew: ey rep; and then discharged on the payment of las Mr. BLAKE said, that he thought tl ought by no means to postpone the invert; this case : it was not proper that such a cha. be kept hanging over the head of an lion.. Sir ROBERT WILSON said, that be principle with the Honourable Member. Mr. STUART WORTLEY had no in e , aggravate the crime of which the young( had been guilty : he would not oppose thl sense of the House, if it should be for the , ,of the young man. Mr. COURTENAY said, that for vAriou he was not inclined to enter into the questi ultimate discharge of Me. T.W. Grad'•. Sir JOHN NEWPORT said the Home tber to:consult - its own dignity than the ct . ; , ny individuals. Mr. CA LC RAFT was for an adjournm bwiness. Sir C. MONC'K said, that Mr. Goold lietOiec with the r.airt. of Mr. Gra.iy, it w - natural that the latter Gentleman should fee inclined to re s ent it. lie certainly did con, Grady's conduct ; but still he shotud not f with himself if he voted against his discha:: : ... The lionourable Gentleman was here intvrr by cries of " Question, question.:'] Mr. GRATTAN thought that the outrageous:- ner in which Mr. Grady had made his atta,:k on: Geoid was such as deserved the attention ei I louse. Every man ougl:t be enabled to state opinion to the llnle, when called before it as a w ness, without any fear of personal danger from whose interests his testimony might be likely to judice. He was desirous not only of securing Grady's person, but also his feelings. Mr. TIERNEY, atter some other remarks, pressed a hope, that the House would not waste further time' in idle discussion, but would ately proceed either to an adjournment a a real vestigation into the evidence. Lord C. CHURCHILL, however, persisted ia determination to divide the House regarding the monition and reprimand which were to be gi' Mr. T. W. Grady, previous to his discharge. The Gallery was then cleared for a divisim, strangers withdrew; but Lord C. Churcliill drew his motion, and in consequence the inatter to the ground. %en strangers were permitted to re-enter ,Gallery, Mr. BROUGHAM was spe .king in favoo: c Mr. Goold's being again called to the liar of e House as a witness. After Mr. Goold's re-examination, which la.cx till a very late hour, Mr. LAN:BTOR was of opirt that further evidence must necessarily be bron;:' from Ireland, to settle a point which at present inexplicable, and which implicated the credibility the too principal wituesses. Mr. CANNING did not conceive that matterc such importance as to 'delay the inquiry. Sir It. WILSON thought it was the duty of House, to have every information which might to the true understanding of the quectiom. Mr. ABERCROMBY conceived the delay in present instance could not be productive of as its object would be to sift the matter to the tom, and thereby arrive at the truth. Sir R. WILSON then moved, that Mr. Carel Smyth he called in, in order to give the names ei his two servants, whose testimony he considered importance. Mr.( '.Smyth was then called in, and gavet.. of his servants, Thomas Lambert and SaraiiLy.,:is. Mr. Goold was also called in, and 0-aye the Hatt: of his servant, Hugh Riles-. Mr. LAMBTON moved, that these persons be ordered to attend at the Bar of the House on Thum day nest. This was carried in the affirmative. Mr. PEEL then observed, that he saw no mut why the petitioner himself should not be called in. He had pledged himself to prove every allegation his petition. Sir It. WILSON had no objection to his being called, but was unwilling to have him produced as? witness while in custody. He could not be suppose to have the vame tranquil L'eliilgs in giving his cr. , deuce when a prisoner, as he must be supposed w have when at liberty. - Mr. PEEL conceived the circurnstutee of his heis a prisoner ought to have no weight with his test'' mony one way or the other. Mr. LAMBTON thought that the pledge C ot : mined in the Petition, to Prove every allegatio n :: contained, did not by any means bind the petit ior.-r to prove it by his own personal evidence, if he d ici by his witnesses. Mr. BROUGHAM said, theie had been co d doubt whe(lier a petitioner could be called in mpr, of his own petition; and mentioned the case of sen:.! fetitieliers on the Orders in Council, who had will: drawn their signatures that they might be admttr ; : as evi.lence; but he conceived that a petitioner err: with propriety be called in support • of his own petiti e. Mr. \V. COURTF.NA was Of opinion that t! petitioner shd'ild be called to state the grounds upel. which he had presented his complaint to the Haus , . Mr. ABERCIIOMBY did not think the evident! of the petitioner in this case as at all essential. Mr. CANgING observed, that after what I.; • fallen,she should persist in wishing that the examin.- tion of evidence be continued on Monday. Sir It. WILSON said, it was his in:ention to 11A-.: called the petitioner himself, but his only ob j 'ectic was his being a prisoner. The question was then put, and the farther exarr nation of witnesses Vl-as postponed till Monday. • netuAblincirmiluta•-su..L. 'Oit the motion of Mr. leijSI4INTON, the rvs*rd itself into a , Cfmriiittieupcit this BM, Mr. LAMaTON aerselluci; that g that liouz oft. 1e , 41% t.ir tl :0 tt , • 1 q r . • S.. • 4 110 ap t ,' a,4! , P•T G. he gezcr • 44.3iXe; US :e.IX.. 1 "..- lan of had 7a, 'll • eoen,3 inutrup). Kenos:7 I,:k on ion et to state 1 ;t as a+4 From t!' ti :ely to wing marks, waste a: Id imme - r a real. isted ;n ing the e givea matter lc e-enter I:wour 13.. r of 1. lc :°i of opir.:l be bron;: . ,resMit edibility t matter d lute of the might lav in 0.1 of to the llr. Carel e names r: tsidered the names th Lyons. the nay.: sersors be on 'Dam live. no mut called is. legation his being duccd as I e SUpPOIC' I ng his er , pposell (his being Is his testi- e dge car legation petitior:! fhedio en or.ct in Farr se of serv! h:td svitl admittr.: Iner PIT; petiti,. that t! unds le Hour evident' ial. what E; exarcir.: - )n to • ohjectic her Lay. the Bill, ouzof ti mjii r , I .!„,;; `•