Star. — London, England, 1809-02-23 00:00:00

mentioned it.—Q. Did ,- one but Mrs. Clarke? sect what passed when Tke three weeks ago ? iber nothing ? A. No, :pre sion ? A. No. —Q. Is defective, as not to re possible ; for it did .—Q. Where did Mrs. the witness ? A. At Did she mention . contemplation ? A. Who was present when took place relating to recollect.—Q. What, present ? Q. I can came Mrs. Clarke to ty ; I did not ask her 'can to say that she does conversation relating A. I suppose it was Jsiness.—Q. Did Mrs. was ? A. I don't know. Mrs. Clarke when she Stness's recollection of . Colonel French Z A. .nber if that was the case. her former examination, sways went by the name that true ? A. Yes. ever go . by the name 1d me he did.—Q. Does 'er said he did ? No, Have you a doubt on Does she mean to say name of Taylor? A. To .—Q. Recollect whether person, that he went by Taylor ? A. Never, have known him.—Q. 'avourite ? A. As far le.—Q How long has or nine years,—Q. Did of Favourite, or has she and when? A. When Clarke's, she went by the she recollect any other ), I do not.—Did she Yes.—Q. Who did she with her ? A. Mrs. and she enquired for the door. they address her ? A. to say that she has never !nt by the name of Far. :nowledge.—Q. She has' •s, and never recollects, she, on any occasion, char ? A. No.—Q. Was she lived with Mr. El . being acquainted with not know that she took the lived with Mr. Ellis ? Did she ever hear of ? A. There was some id the witness know any Favourite or Farquhar ? ) Might not her father name of Chance, with 'w could I know it, if it ? (A laugh.) the EXCHEQUER.) Is Yes, he Is not ? tremely affected was or co this course of exami or not, that her father was, he contended, of (tested against any at the witness into contra- ,NERAL agreed that it inquiry before the Conk , to affect the credit of ter father never went by lways by the name bf it was competent for call evidence to contra ' maintain that any tern name, arising from em stances, should not affect testions pressed upon her ;nation, appeared to be the EXCHEQUER Ate, when ready to de appeared to forget ed herself, in her former :e daughter of married clear, by the imprison te never was married to did dislike the tenor of allowed by the opposite part a tendency to cast :er of the witness herself; ieracity was to be ques-1 misfortune to be the off. 4. Her delicacy in en ircumstance, in his opi axengthened her yet un '-nr, hear, hear !) Larked upon the painful the Exchequer, even if ends of justice, to put witness ; but if eventu. unnecessarily harassed he was convinced that leman would regret that ions. For his own part, and did not think any shake her testimony : evidence, she had shewn ich much -interested him Honourable Gentleman look her respectability, it her credibility--(Hear reason why her testimony Mr. C. W. Wiewwi'Was he printed minutes 4f esi •tes remarking upon the. thought of it since, but never me the witness ever mention it to any A. 0 no.-0. Does she recollec she mentioned it to Mrs. Clan A. No. Q. Can the witness remember nothing.—Q. Not one expressio the witness's memory sp very de collect what passed ? A. Very not in the least interest me.— Clarke mention the subject to t her house at Westbourne-place.- to her that any inquiry was in No, not that I recollect.—Q. W Mrs. Clarke mentioned what to Colonel French ? A. I can't recollect no fact, nor who was not recollect at all.--Q. How mention that ? A. I can't say that.—Q. Does the witness DIN not know on what occasion the to Colonel French occurred ? something relating to this btu Clarke inform witness that it w: —Q. Was there nobody with 1 asked questions relating to wit Mrs. Clarke's expression about I I believe not; I cannot rememb The witness stated in her that her father and mother alw; of Taylor ? A. I did.--Q. Is —Q. Did the witness's father of Chance ? A. He never told she mean to state that she neve I don't think I ever did.—Q. the subject ? A. None.—Q. I that he always passed by the na the best of my knowledge.-1 you ever mentioned to any pee any other name than that of throughout the whole time I t Does the witness know Mrs. Fa • as she is servant to Mrs. Clarke she known her ? A. Eight or she always go by the name of known her by any other name, first she knew her at Mrs. Clar name of Martha.—Q. Does s name she went by ? A. No, visit her at Mr. Ellis's ? A. 1 enquire for, and who was Clarke's sister was with her, nobody, as Favourite opened t.l Q. By what name did th , Martha.—Q. Does she mean to known that Mrs. Favourite we: quhar ? A. Never, to her kn known her eight or nine years, that in the course of that time, went by the name of Farquha she acquainted with her when lis ? A. Yes. I knew her as Mrs. Clarke.—Q. Does she n the name of Farquhar when sh A. I never knew she did.—Q. Mrs. Favourite being married : talk of it is the house.—Q. Did relations belonging to Mrs. F A. Not one. Q. y Mr. C. BRADSHAW.) fromdistress have taken the out her knowledge ? A. How was not within my knowledge Q. (By the CHANCELLOR of witness's father alive ? A. Y her mother in custody for debt [The witness appearing extr dered to withdraw.) Mr. W. SMITH objected to nation ; whether she knew or went by the name of Chance, little consequence. He prot tempts to endeavour to draw t dictions. The SOLICITOR GENT wa:-; not very material to the it mittee ; but would it not go the witness, if it appeared her the name of Taylor, but ali Chance? Mr. WHITBREAD said t he Learned Gentleman to c . dict the witness, but he would porary change in her father's r harrassments or other circumst the witness's credit. The que on this and her former examii very severe. 1, The CHANCELLOR of stated that Gentlemen opposi ik • preciate his mode of examinat flat the witness had represente examination, as the legitimate parents, although it was now ment of her mother, that she the father of Miss Taylor, 1 I Mr. WILLIAM SMITH the examination which was fol side. It had in the previous p I imputations upon the character but, that having failed, her ve tioned, because she had the m spring of an illicit connexion. deavouring to conceal that ci: nion instead of weakening, str shaken claims to credit.—(Her Mr. WHITBREAD rema situation of the Chancellor of he found it his duty for the e such painful questions to the 1 ally he should find that he had the feelings of Miss Taylor, the Right Honourable Gentle he had ever put such questio he felt much for the witness, c thing had yet appeared to throughout the whole of her e a sensibility and modesty whit in her behalf; and if the thought that illegitimacy shot could not in any way affect I Hear !) As yet, he saw no re should be doubted. During this conversation /1 bu , ily employed searching the deuce on the table; and, atte • feelings of some Mitten beings, read that part of her evidence which she had given a few evenings before relative to her father and mother, by which it ap peared only that she had said her father's name was Taylor, and that her mother's name was Taylor— ! (Hear _ Isar ! ) Mr. WILLIAMS WYNNE said, it was not to be endured, that because, from an amiable reluctance, the explanation of the witness did not rum before de corum and sensibility, that, therefore, a suspicion was to be entertained of her veracity. Sir JOHN SEBRIGHT declared, that the im pression which the first answer of the witness, on her former examination,namely,that she was the daughter of a Gentleman, made on his mind was, that she was an illegitimate child. Mr. BARHAM—ReaIIy this is an attempt to dis credit a correct witness, not upon her own testimony, but upon the errors of her parents (Hear! hear ! ) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that it was very painful to him to be under the necessity of pressing questions that could distress the feelings of any female ; but he felt it necessary to have an answer to the question. The witness was called in. Q. I wish to ask the witness whether her mother is not in execution for debt ? A. My mother has nothing to do with the present queition.—Question repeated - . I ask does the witness know it ? A. I wish to know whether I am to answer that question. Mr. WHARTON.—es It is my duty to tell the witness that the House is of opinion she must answer the question." Q. Well then, I will change the form of the ques tion. Is she in custody for debt ? A. Yes.—Q. How long ? A. Two years.—Witness withdrew. FREDERICK SCHMIDT, examined by General LOFT. Q. What is Mr. S chmidt ? A. A brazier and tin man.—Q. Does he know Miss Mary Anne Taylor, and how long ? A. Yes. I have known her about fifteen years.—Q. Does he know her mother ? A. Yes. —Q. Does he know her father ? A. Yes.—Q. What is his name ? A. Thomas Chance.—Q. What profes sion was he of ? A. A stock-broker, but he failed, I believe.--.Q. Has he done any business for the witness? A. Yes, he has.—Q. Did he ever purchase any land from him t A. Yes, he has.—Q. In what name ? A. In the name of dhance.—Q. Did he tell the wit ness he had a wife ? A. His wife was Mrs. Taylor ; Mrs. Taylor passed for his wife.—Q. Did he ever tell him he had another wife ? A. No.—Q. Did he give security for Mrs. Taylor for the rules of the Fleet, or King's Bench ? A. No.—Q. Has witness ever inquired for him at the Stock Exchange by the name of Taylor, and did he find him by that name? A. No, I inquired for him by the name of Taylor, and found him by the name of Chance.—Q. When did he cease to be a broker ? A. About two years ago, to the best of my knowledge.—Q. Did he tio business at the Stock Exchangeby thename of Taylor? A. I believe not.—Q. Did he ever see him with his daughter, Miss Mary Anne Taylor ? A. Yes.—Q. Did he go by the name of Chance at that time ? A. He went by the name of Taylor. Q. (By Mr. W. SMITH.) I desire to know from the witness why he enquired for him by the name of Taylor ? A. I always thought his name was Taylor. —Q. At what time did he iced out his name was Chance ? A. When I asked him to do business for me at the Stock Exchange.—Q. What name did he go by when the witness first knew him ? A. Thomas Taylor, ever since I knew him.—Q. How long has he known him by that name ? A. He went by that name until I found out his name was Chance.—Q. How long ago is it since he found out his name was Chance ? A. It was several years ago ; my memory is very bad ; but I could find it out by some papers I have. Q. Where did he live when he knew him by the name of Taylor ? A. He went by the name of Taylor in Ormond-street, and at Bayswater.— Q. Was he universally known at both these places by the name of Taylor ?. A. Yes. Q. (By General Lorr.) Does the witness recol lect Mrs. Taylor and Miss Mary Anne Taylor calling on him with a bill, or some' security for money '? A. I recollect they came to borrow money of me, and said they had a paper to give me, which they would not entrust to any one else.—Q. Did he state Mr. Chance was coming there, and did they say they knew him ? A. Yes.—Q. What answer did Miss Taylor make when he told her that Mr. Chance was coming : did she make any observation ? A. Miss Mary Anne Taylor smiled, and said, we will only say we came to pay Mrs. Schmidt a morning visit.— Q. Did she appear to know who Mr. Chance was ? Question objected to, and witness ordered to with draw. Q. Did Miss Mary Ann Taylor make any, and what observations on that occasion ? A. She said we will tell my father (I am not quite positive) that we had only paid a visit to Mr. Schmidt. Soon after they went away. Q. (By Sir JOHN SEBRIGHT2 Are you quite sure that it was Mr. Chance, you tol them would call ?A. No, I am not quite sure.—Q. You are not quite sure then, whether it was Mr. Chance or Mr. Taylor you said ? A. I believe I told them Mr. Taylor (A Ind and patrol laugh.) I suppose I did call him Mr. Tay.._ for out of compliment to them. Mr. YORK then rose to ask the General Offi cers present, whether the Army had not been muchim proved in discipline and condition, during the time that the Duke of York was at the head of it, and whe ther the system of promotion in the service was not much better than it had been before ? General NORTON (who was first examined) said, that as to the system of promotions he could not speak accurately. He recollected, however, that in former days, those Officers who had great interest were promoted rapidly, and in a manner that was not right. As to the general service of the army, his Royal Highness had done it more service than all the Commanders in Chief who ever went before him.— He remembered the time when the allowance of vic tuals was so scanty, that when the 33d regiment was on its return to England, and the men were told that whoever chose to remain behind might do so, the whole regiment wished to stay, and the reason they gave was, that in every other country they had bread to eat, but when they got to England they would be often without their dinners. His Royal Highness, upon bearing this, got the allowances of bread and beer increased, and afterwards got them an augmen tation of their pay.; and he now considered that the situation of the soldiers was very comfortable. He _ne.zt stated some instances, to shew that there had been a very great improvelfient at Chelsea Hospital, and in the care and attention paid to wounded soldiers. Mr. YOSSE then put to General NORTON the following Question i Q. Has the discipline and condition of the British army declined or improved during Th e Administra tion of his Royal Highness ? A. I-really cannot say about the discipline. I know there was a very good system of discipline before the Duke was at the head. I believe a very good system of discipline prevailed in our armies, when General Wolfe and other British Generals gained great honour. I really cannot say that it is my opinion, that the discipline of our army is better now than it was then. General FITZPATRICK said, that though of vety old standing in the army, he had, perhaps, not as good opportunities as others of forming a correct judgment on the subject. He should, however, say, ' that he believed the British . army was in every respect wonderfully -.improved under the administration of his Royal Highness. He did conceive that this was a thing of such notoriety to every Officer in the ser vice, that he thought it was hardly necessary to ap peal to the testimony of General Officers on the subject. SirJAMES PULTENEY concurred inevery word that had been said by his Right Honourable Friend opposite him (General Fitzpatrick). At the time when his Royal Highness came to the command, it was a period when such abuses had taken place as threatened to desitoy the discipline and good condition of the army. Promotions were got merely by money, or by raising men for rank. Instances were then fre quent of a man being raised to the rank of Lieutenant- Colonel in a year or two. His Royal Highness, how ever, introduced a regulation which was rigidly ad hered to, that no man could be a Captain under two years service, or a Field Officer under six. The dis cipline of the British army was also much improved. Before he came into command, six British regiments could not be put into a field, and go through the re gular field manoeuvres with any due precision. His Royal Highness, by introducing an uniform system of discipline throughout the British army, had much improved their field discipline. At present, any num ber of British regiments could go through the various operations of manoeuvre, with as much precision and concert, as the different companies of a single regi ment. Sir ARTHUR WELLESLEY said, that as to the system of promotions which formerly prevailed, he did not know much about it. He believed, how ever, that it was very irregularly conducted before his Royal Highness was appointed Commander in Chief. The regulations which he had laid down had been strictly adhered to, and had given general satisfac tion. He had frequently occasion to apply to his Royal Highness on this subject on account of the si tuation he held (Secretary for Ireland). He always found that his applications were attended to, and he knew that many had obtained commissions from di arct application to the Duke of York. He was a Lieutenant Colonel at the time that the Duke of York took the command, and for the last twenty years, he had paid great attention to the army,'and thought he could form a judgment. The army was most mate rially improved in every respect, both in soldiers and in officers. The Staff of the army was much better than it was formerly, the cavalry were better, and the officers of cavalry were better also. The army was more complete in numbers, and superior in subordi nation and dicipline to what it had been. It was su perior in every thing of interior economy, in provi sions for subsistence and clothing. He was convinced that those improvements had been owing principally to the regulations introduced by his Royal Highness, and by his superintendance and influence over the Ge neral Officers and others, who were to carry these re gulations into effect. General MATTHEW also bore testimony to the excellent state of the British army. The evidence on both sides here closed. The evidence being finally concluded, Mr. PERCE VAL suggested, that as the whole of the minutes would be printed by Monday next, it . might be proper to-fix the earliest opportunity after, for taking the report into consideration ; he therefore proposed Thursday next for that purpose, which, with the approbation of Mr. WARDLE, was agreed to. The House being resumed, the report was bronght up, and the consideration of it fixed for that day. Mr. C. W. WYNNE gave notice, - that he would on the day following submit a motion to the House, respecting the evidence given by General Clavering before the Committee. The SECRETARY AT WAR presented the Annual Mutiny Bill, which was read a first time. The House adjourned at half-past three o'clock to this day. THE EVENING STAR. LONDON. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23. PRICE OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK : Consols, for snoney, 6715—f0r account 67,11-01un. 1 pr. ' B:chequer Bills 12s. to 13s. pre. By a Mail, from Lisbon we have received Portu gueze Papers to the 16th instant. They are filled with proclamations, which we have not room to give at length : their tendency is to threaten with punish ment the disturbers of the public peace ; and, we are sorry to state, that it appears from the tenor of one of these documents, that the British subjects now in Portugal had been insulted by the populace. The following is the preamble of the Proclamation on this subject Just representations have been made of an insult offered in this capital, to the Officers of the .navy and army of his BRITANNIC MAJESTY, to the Governors of the kingdom, and to individuals at tached and belonging to the British Embassy in Por tugal."—lt concludes by' exhorting the people to manifest a proper submission to the laws. In another Proclamation, all Frenchmen are or dered to be sent out of Portugal within eight days, oz* pain of imprisonment. We have reEeived Bahama Papers to the 28th of December inclusive, but they contain no news. NAP'AL 11VTELLIGENCE. The George, at Liverpool, was lost at New Provident., a. the 17th of December last. The Swallow, Ryan, from Newfoundland, for Ross, is an shut( Youghall Bay. Crew saved. TORBAY Frs. 21,—Sailed the Channel fleet, to resum e OA stallion Off inst.—Wind N.W. ikt-ticnirn, Fes. 20.—Arrived the ship Sarah, MAttzt- t fron t London for the Mediterranean ; the brig Elisabeth, C OOE I from-Liverpool fir Rio'de Janeiro, much stimaged ; the ship B s . sannah, from Liverpool for the West-Indies, 24 days out, a n d Is very leaky ; the brig Jolly Butcher, WATT master, from L ess ., don for Cordons very moth damaged in her sails and riga !, Ike.. the Antelo pe transport, Captatn WAERIN, from Lisbon ; tos le t e l l e s s ships SKIN t,STIIILLIL,SHId rECLAIR,frorn creite ; the Charlotte packett, Brae, from Lisbon, with mail s; dispatches, and 24 passengers, in six days : among whom i s C s . lonel HAWKER charged with dispatches from the Hon. M r. lifts.ti las, for Government. Mr. SHAW, the Messenger, is also on board. It was reported at Lisbon that the Emperor of Austria has declared war against France. The Walsingham packet w as arrived out in 22 days.—Wind West. PLTMOUTM, Fits. tl.—This morning sailed the 8A1171.Z11 ,98 guts, ZzAtous and ELIZABETH, 74 guns each, to join the Chan. nel fleet; BOSIZAT 74 guns, for Cadiz • AMAZON, 38 gum ~ , r„ Lisbon, with a General Officer An board; and the Black Joke lugger, with dispatches for Cadiz. PLY nowt et Dace Pea. el.—Arrived the ADRIAN hired cutter, from the Channel Beet.—This day near 30 sail of traits. perts, having the remainder of the troops on board, who hav e been so long lying here, (with the exception of those sick in the different hospitals and barracks), sailed from Hannutze and Cit. water, for Portsmouth and the Downs, under convoy of the Goa. HAWK brig of war. - PORTSMOUTH, Frs. 22.—Sailed his Majesty's ship with the Warren Hastings, True Briton, Neptune, Scalesby C as . tie, Cumberland, Lord Melville, Perseverance, Nottingha m , Cantatic, Lord Duncan , Baring, and the Lady Castlereagh, f or the East Indies. The Cifratells sailed yesterday with his M . ajesty' ; ship Nassau, for St. Helena.—Sailed his Majesty's ship HIRER ' NIA, and the Vitt! U.K Paris, to the Westward; Qurrrc sr? PODARGUS, on a cruizc. Drat., Fes. 22.—Arrived bL Majesty's ships EUR TA its s nnti ZINOSIA from a cruizr. Put back the outward-bound, fit, which sailed yesterday, and remain in the Downs with his Ala• jesty's ships as per test. • GRXFNOCK, Frs. 20.—An American brig called the Emit:- your, from N,.:w York for Boston, arrived here this morning, in 38 days; her cargo consists of 170 bales cotton, 190 barrels tar, 21 hogsheads tobacco, s barrels flour, 11 half do. do. Y kegs hogs lard, 1 tierce beans, 9 barrels pork, and 1 tierce crackers: eighteen vessels, chiefly shipss cleared out same day for Boston. Th e Nereid, Jo umi t ro iv, arrived here on Saturday last, from Detne-. tars, after a passage of 46 days; left the Commerce, WATT;• Hero, Casteroc ; Paragon, late Ma LER ; and Belleisle, GEMMtLI., of this port, loading, and expected to sail about the 6th inst. The Duke of Kent, Dot/GALL, of this port, was loading for Liverpool, and expected to sail about the same time. Spoke no vessels. Yesterday, at twelve o'clock, his MAJESTY arrived at the Queen's Palace from Windsor, where he was received by the Dukes of Yoßx, KENT, SUSSEX, and CAMBRIDGE. At two o'clock has MAJESTY held a private Levee. The following had the honour of being presented to his MAJESTY : Colonel JAMIS CATLIN CRAOTURD, on his return from Pot. tugal and Spain, where he served as Brigadier General. ' Lieutenant EDGAR on his promotion to his Majesty's 2d RP. giment of Life Guards. Lord BROWNLOW, on his being appointed Lord Lieutenant of the county of Lincoln, in the room of the late Duke of An caster. Captain MILLMAN, of the Coldstream Regiment of Guards, Aid-sle•Camp to Brigadier• General Catlin Craufurd, on his return from Portugal. _ . Mr. WILLIAM WYNDIIAM, 'on his return free a Foreign, Mission. Lieut.-Central Lord PACrr, on his return from Spain. Admiral Sir CHARLLS COTTON, on his return to England. Captaia.CARNAC, on his exchange from the 11th Rtgimcnt of Foot to the Ist Regiment of Life Guards. Lieut. Bairs.rx, Aide-de-Camp to Lieut.-General Lord Pac xr, on his return to England. Capt. RowLEr, of his -Majesty's ship the Eagle, on his return from Sicily. Lieut. itt.t.t., on his promotion to his Majesty's 2d Regimert of Life Guards, by Lord ileathfield. Lord WILLIAM BENTINCK, on his return from Spain. Mr. HUNTER, Consul General in Spain, on his arrival is England. Lieutenant Paassaarors, on his promotion to his Majesty's 2d Regiment of Life Guards, by Lord Heathfield. The Rev. Dr. CAREY Sub-Almoner to his Majesty, on his being appointed Prebendary of Westminster; he at the same time presented the Sermon preached by him before the House ok Commons on the Fast Day. Colonel FOSTER, on his being appointed to his Majesty's Privy Council in Ireland, and on his return from the Continent. Lieutenant F. Fatirr, on his being appointed to his Majesty's 2d Regiment of Life Guards. His MAJZSTY held a Privy Council, and gave pri• vate audiences to the Duke of Poarclato, the other Cabinet Ministers present, and the JUDGE ADVOCATE, who laid before his MAJESTY the proceedings of se. veral Courts-Martial. It appears from the Eight Rep ort of the Commit. tee of Military Inquiry, that the allowance for the table of the officers on guard amounts to 9181 i. Bs. per annum. The table is for 16 persons, which makes the rate of the yearly expenditure for each, about 5741. The table was formerly maintained by the pay of a certain number of men, called outlier:, whose pay was stopped in consequence of their receiving permis• sion to work, but this practice was abolished by order of his Majesty; in 1793. The report that last night was to have been the last appearance of Mrs. CLARKE at the Bar of the House of Commons, in support of the charges against the Duke of Yorke having gone abroad, the gallery and all the avenues to the. House were filled at an early hour. Yesterday, when she withdrew from the House, the pressure was so great it was found necessary for two Gentlemen, one on each side, to escort her, and a AGM of constables who were in attendance to clear the way.—Mrs. CLARKE seemed pleased with these marks of attention. She displayed a new drt. s upon the occasion.—lt was a white satin pelisse aid bonnet, with a veil. Yesterday a Court of Directors was held at the East-lod:a House, when the undermentioned appointments toot place, viz. —Mr. JAMES COOGAN, Paymaster of Seamen's Wages, in the room of Mr. CHATFIELD, resigned.—Mr. WM. COLSON, De pety Paymaster.—Mr. JOHN Moasce, Clerk to the Committee of Shipping, in the room of Mr. JAMES COGGAN.—Mr.RICHARD La GROSS, Assistant Clerk to the Committee of Slaipping.—Mt. AUGUSTUS WARREN, Chief of the Office for Private Trade, outwards. ' The destination of the ship Henry Addington, Capt. KIRRPA• Tana, was altered from Bombay and China, to Bombay direct. Ex tcu o N —An immense crowd of people, particularly wo men, assembled yesterday morning at an early hour, to witness the execution of John Nichol'', convicted of forging Bank Notes ; and Margaret Barrington convicted of taking a false oath to sb tain letters of administration, with intent to defraud a soldier's relatives of price-money due to him. Both the unfortunate peo ple made their appearance about eight o'clock : they were dress ed in black, and seemed perfectly composed. They prayed apps• rently very fervently for about five minutes, and were then launcbed into eternity. LONDON: Printed and Published by LEVEL ICENT,of CAP tertiary Place, Lambeth, at the STAI-Or net, No. l. Cuff* street. Published also at the STA a-Or rtes. Temple U. N