Star. — London, England, 1811-01-07 00:00:00

I - sow . to inthihie such complisency ? For how corn, pletely in every part did the proceedings of this night verify his predictions of a. former night, if the plan then recommended by him was not adopted ?—(iftar, hear,) —)gut he could not in his countenance exhibit such complacency, for he was incapable of feeling it in his heart. —Vitae, hear.)-,- He felt for the situation in which the cbuntry was placed, in consequence of the novel and unconstitutional mode of poceeding whi:h the two Houses had adopted. The dilemma to which the House was now reduced-41)e emergency in consequence of which they were now called on to provide the means of authorising the Issues of Public Money for the Naval and-Military service's of the co ontry.....the necessity which was now pleaded as an excuse for the two Houses of Parliament assuming to themselves the exercise of the Royal Functions—he h a d warned the House, must sooner or later occur, and must assuredly overtake them before they had supplied the deficiency in the Executive Power, if they did not adopt the coarse he had pointed out. That course his Noble and Learned Friend had now conjured them to revert to. He (Lord Holland) most fervently concurred in that recommendation. By gdhering to the plan they had first adopted, they could only tun farther into error ; and necessity would be pleaded upon the back of necessity, till at length the assumption of the power of the King would be come with them it thing of course—a matter of every day's practice, " The fattest goes, and goes astray, " Still farther rum from the right way." The wording of the Readdtiost:te conceived to be extremely objectionablea• The term" command" was one which had never...bete used, even by the Long Parliament, till the very moment when they were about .to deprive the King entirely of his Sovereign Authority. - By addressing the Prince of Wales to take on himself the management of the Military and' Naval Affairs of the country, and also to order the issues of the public money for the service of the State, even till their Bill should pass, if the Houses of Par. Lament were resolved to proceed in that manner, all such diflictilties as the present would be guarded against, and he conjured the House to adopt this triode of poceeding. Earl ROSSLYN begged to call the attention of their Lordships only to-one circumstance which bad not yet been remarked on, namely, that they were called on by the present Resolution to go infinitely beyond the object avowed '.by the Noble Secretary ; for, instead of the 'Resolution being confined to the sums in the Appropriation Act alone, it comprehend ed the three millions granted by the vote of credit also. Were_their Lordships, then, without even apy alledged necessity; to put this sum at the disposal of Ministers, thereby superseding to that extent the au thority of the Sovereign, in the event of rpeovery, oyes. a sum confided by Parliameip to his Rafid disoretke2 The Earl of LIVERPOOL explained, that the posal of any part of this Ina was, by _she Reaolation, confined to the services of thErnavy, army , and ord nance, to deficiencies arising in Which serv ices it was customary at this season of the year to apply any parr of the Vote of Credit which remained undisposed of. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE concurred in this as being the customary mode of. proceeeling. He tboaght, however, that the ;wo Houses of Parliament could not be called oft.to:go beyond the actual neces sity of the case, and frown the documents on the table, it appeared that the immediate necessity, being all which their Lordships could now be called en to pro vide for, amounted only to an issue to the order of 81,000,000 or 4500,000, for each of the two services. He should move an amendment restricting it to this sum. The Earl of LAUDERDALE could not .conceive that the authority for making the issues for the naval and military services should be limited to th• period when the deficiency in the royal authority should be supplied alone, but should contemplate the recovery of his Majesty also. He should thefefore move an amendment to that effect. Lot 4 HOLLAND said, he should also nn the Re. port move as an amendment, that the word 4 , Com mand" in the Resolution be changed into the word 4 , Order: it being his wish that this Amendment should appear on the Journals. The Resolution was then put and agreed to. On bringing up the Report. the .Amendments of the Marquis of . Lansdowne, and of Lords laulland and Lauderdale, were severallt put and negatiCed without a division. The Report was agreed to with out any Amendment, and a Message was ordCred to be sent to the,Commons, requesting a conference on' Cte subject of the said Resolution. Lord HOLLAND presented a Petition froth the' Mayor, Aldermen, and Corporation of the Boronghj of Nottingham, praying that the Prince - of Wales , might be Appointed Regent without any lituitatiOn Qt rtstricticn.—Ordered to lie on the table. ' t, Ailic,urced till Monday (dais day). Horst or comitorrt . Mr. LONG was crderid t o carry to the Lords the 'Resolutions of last night, authorising the Issue frum the Exchequer of the slims toted during the last Ses !ion cf Parliament; far the. Army, Navy, and nance, and to request a Conference with their Lord~ ships thereon, and their concurrence it said Reiohal. t!en. On Mr. Low's return i fie infccined the Hoeti ; that the Lord s had appOinted a conference forthwith' ta the Painted Chamber on the subject 'of - said Resolu. Lotso, Mr. BeCretary Remus, the Lou) ADVOCATE and SOLICITOR-GENERAL of SCOTLAND, Mr. MANNEdb SUTTON; 'LCTit G TuyNNE, ace.. were appointed to m an a ge th i eiinference on the part of the Coinmons; and went forth-accordingly for that par purpose. On their return, Mr. Lox° informed the . House that the Lords hid agreed to take the. same into consideration. • ,• &message WWI afterwards brougjit from OA Lords, desiring a cohference with the Commrs on the sish. jcct matter , of their cogerence Of lit en inUar Y The sa me managers were appointed to condeet this conference, who on. their return presented a copy Of the 12.‘solutii)ns•of that House relative to the Regency,i :is they hitii been amended last.nighs in the House ofi Lords ; to which atnendolepts the Lords had reques t. d the concurrence of the Commons. On the mo finn of Mr. Secret RYDER, the amendments were, :rAd e first and second time, and ordered to be taken .'.to further consideration. on Monday seat, to which sAy tide House Adjourned. , - • • • - .11 , DISCUSSIONS AND DIVISIONS IN TILE HOUSE OF LORDS, ON FRIDAY NIGHT, WHILE STRANGERS WERE WITHDRAWN. t The substance of the discussions and repeated Di. 1 visions which took place in the House of Lords on Friday night, after strangers had withdrawn, was cor rectly stated in the STAR of Saturday. There were in all five Divisions. .By the first the sense of the House, as tothe appointment of the Regent, without ' restriction, was declared ; for the Marquis of LANs- Downes Motion was to leave out the words 4 , subject ursuch Restrictions and Limitations as may be here after provided." 1 List of the Majority who voted for appointing the Prince of WALES Regent, without Restrictions or Li mitations : York, Cholmondeley, 'Castings (Moira) Clarence, Oxford, Clifton (Darnley) %Dent, Tankerville, Dutton (Douglas) Sussex, Bristol, Boyle (C.rke) Cambridge, Cowper, Pensonby (Bests ) 1 Cumberland, Stanhope, Holland, Gloucester, Waldegrave, Dude, Norfolk, Fitzwilliam, Hawke, iota e r se t , Guildford, Foley, Bt. Alban's, Hardwicke, Ashburton, Bedford, Darlington, Grantley, -Devonshire, Spencer, Bulkeley, Winchester, Clarendon, Somers, Buck ingham, Alsergavenny, Borlngdon, Lansdowne, Fortescue, Heath:loJ, Stafford, St. Vincent, Braybrooko, To-onshend, Rosslyn, (;renville, Hertford, Craven, Thurlow, Derby, Chichester. Auckland, Suffolk, Nelson, Mendip, 'flatlet, ere. f...rd. Dundas, Essex, t i olinghroke, Yarborough, Lindsey, Maynard, Downay, Carlisle,. Hampden, Gwydyr, Scarborongb, Duncan, • Cawdor, Albemarle, Anson, Carrington, Coventry, Lake, Seafrrt h, Jersey, Say and Stle, Buller (Ormond) Carysfort, Crewe, I.ucan, Alvanley, Ponsonby (ImokIlly) Conyngham Keith,' Ailla - (Cassillis) Donoughmorai Hutchinson, Headforr, 115110 PS. Erskine, Charlemont, Rochester, Androssan Kingston, ~ Exeter, 1 Lauderda le, Roden, • Oxford. Granard, Upon the Second Resolution being read respecting the Restriction upon the grant of Peerages, Lord LI VERPOOL moved an Amendment previously contended for by Lord GRENVILLE, to omit the exception in fa vour of persons distinguished for military services. Lord GRENVILLE stated, that being of opinion that some Restriction of Peerage was necessary, and his only objection to the Resolution as it now stood being removed, be should feel himself obliged to vote for the Resolution. Lord Lansdowne then stated, that conceiving the suspension of the power of granting Peerages, a sus pension of one of the most essential and constitutional frtives.of the Crown, and a suspension not called il ga thisituotaufee. by any just apprehension of dan ger from the exercise ; he should for the same reasons that had induced him to propose the Amendment which the Committee had adopted, proposed to nega tive this-Resolution, and take the sense of the (Com mittee. 'The Committee then divided, • Contents for the Resolution - 106 - Against it - - - 100 • This was composed in the following way : • Ministers had in the first division - log Of whom, hoviever, two voted against them - 2 Which reduced them to - 100 .To which add, Lords Grenville, Clarendon, Forteseue, Auckland, and Ashburton, and the Bishop of Oxford 6 106 On the aide of Opposition.which on the first question was 105 The above six Peers voted on the other side, and one Peer went away 7 Reducing them to - - . 98 But two Peers as above joined them, viz. the Earl of Pgremont and Lord Hood - . 2 Making them - - - . 100 Upon the Third Resolution tespecting Pensions, Lord Lansdowne said, that he felt the same objection to it with the former, but as it rested upon the same principle with that which the Committee had just agreed to, he would not give them the trouble of di viding again ; and it was agreed to. The Resolu tion respecting Personal Property was then agreed to without a division. • Upon the Fifth Resolution, Lord Liverpool moved an Amendment similar to that proposed by Mr. Per ceval in the House of Commons, upon which the Committee divided, _ Fur the Amendment - . - - 97 Against it. - - - - .- 110 Add to the original Lords in the Majority on the . fli•st diyision, which was - -10 S Ennis of Egremont, Radnor, Selkirk ; Loris Hood and Clancarty - - - - 4 4.•m1..• • Making the Majority - - 100 Which taken from the Ministerial 102, left them - 97. Upon these resolutions being reported to the House, Lord Liverpool said he should move to restore the' words which the Committee had agreed to leave . out in the first Resolution. . Lord Lansdowne then said, that as it was desirable to get through the Report that night, he would not take the sense of the House upon the motion. of the Noble Earl ; being aware, that since the majority of the Committee bad agreed with him in the Amend ment he had proposed, they bad been induced to agree to two distinct restrictions and limitations, by which means the Resolutions might appear inconsistent with each other ; and several Noble Lords who voted with him at first, might upon this ground not be disposed to do so now ; he would therefore, retaining to its full extent his opinion as to the propriety of omitting the .words, so far waive any opposition to the Noble Lord's .proposiiion to restore them, as not to take the sense of the ilouse upon it. :Lord Spencer and Lord Moira concurred in the esped:ency of not taking the sense of the House. . Lord Live:pool's amendment was then carried without a division. Lord Liverpool now stated his intention, sbotild 'there be a difference of opinion upon the furthei ;amend ment which he meant again to ,propose to the Fifth Resolution, to call for Proties.—Lord-Erskine, Lord Holland, Lord Stanhope, and Lord L-msdowne, ex pressed their opinion that Proxies could not be called fors the House havii‘g appointed a Committee to in ^ire whethetiict the prcsent - Ag es, prozies ~_.. _. • could be tailed Aar, 114 living eon* re Ito &dim, upon this Report. - • The Lord Chancellor maintained the Iropriety of receiving Proxies. Lord - Moira then moved, that the tiebsie upon the subject be adjourned during pleasure, for the purpose of considering the question of Proxies 7 -the House di ' Tided—For the adjourriment 102—Against it 99. The Earl of Lauderdale and Lord Mulgrave were appointed TeUers.—The Earl of Lauderdale refused to take Proxies ; Lord Mulgrave contended for them ; but the point being stated to the House by the Chan cellor, from the Woolsack, and the numbers actually voting stated, a motion was made, that Proxies be ! now called over by the Clerk, (and the following Re pert from the Committee was read), upon which the House divided : ISE TUS LORD. commirmrs APPOINTED TO /ARCM FOR tILSIDZNTS ZZZZZ mu° TOIL vat OF Fit(Mit IN CASKS SHAMA& TO TUC PILL3rNT, ANO IitPOILT TO Tilt VOUS& Ordeted to Report—That the Committee have nut, and in spected the 'mythl forms of Proxies, and having examined the Journals, can find no precedent exactly similar to the present, excepting that of 1788-9, at which period Proxies appear to have been entered from the 4th December down to the 34 February . ; on which day a commission was read for holding the Parsta ment, purporting to be" By the King himself, with the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Ten:it/oral, and Commons, assembled ac tording to the prorogation aforesaid." From this period to the ' end of the Session, Proxies were continued to be entered; from the 20th November, on which day the Lords were assembled, to the 10th March, there dues not appear to have been any divi sion in the House; on which 10th March a fresh Conanisbion was issued, signed by the King himself, for declaring further causes fur dpening the Parliament. On she loth of July 1789, upon a question whnthereertain Petitioners should be heard by their Counsel against the third reading of a Bill, intiruled, " An Act for making and maintaining a navigable Canal front or from near t• Cromford Bridge, in the County of Derby, to join and communicate with the Erewask Canal, at •r near Langley ' Bridge ; and also a collateral Cut front the said intended Canal , at or near Codnor Park Mill, to or near Pinata) Mill in the said county," a division took place in the House, by which it ap pears the Lords present on that day were 33; the Lords who voted in the House were 22. Proxies were given. and it appears that the Earl of Morton and Lord Cathcart, who each Leld a Proxy, entered on the 29th of December 1788, were present in the House that day. The number of Proxies held by all the Lords present were 18, and the number of Lords wko held those Proxies 13. The number of Proxies given were 11. The Committee also feel it proper to draw the attention of the House to the ease of 1660, at which period there does not appear to be any Proxy Book or Minute Book existing amongst tie records of your Lordships House.—For the Motion of calling Proxies !9.—Against it IGe. The Earl of Moira was then about to propose a general Resolution respecting proxies ; when the Earl of Liverpool stated his intention not to call for them again; upon which the debar, upon the Report was resumed, and the Eirl of Liverpool's Amendment negatived without a division. RETURN to an ORDER of the Honourable HOUSE of COM MONS, for Copy of a Letter from the Deputy Clerks of the Privy Seal. oT the 4th lanuhry, 1811 ; stating their Reasons why they could not prepare Letters to pats the Privy Seal, for the Issue of certain Sums of Money for the Service of the Navy and Army. GEO. HAR R MON, Whitehall Treasury Chambers, lan. 4, tell. Sic, Privy Seal Office, 4 h Jan. 1811. In pursuance of your request, by command of the Lords Com missioaers of his Majesty's Treasury, that we should state, in writing, the reason which induced into acquaint the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal, that we could not execute the command to prepare Letters to pass thl Privy Seal, for the is..ue of certain Sums of Money for the Navy and Army, we have no difficulty in complying with your request. The course of official routine, before we present the Letters of Privy Seal to the Lord Keeper, is as follows : A Warrant, signed by the King, and countersigned by three Lords of the Treasury, is directed to the Clerk of the Signet, or dering him to prepare a Bill for tits Royal Signature, to cause Letters of Privy Seal to pass.. The Clerk of the Signet they pre pares a transcript of this Bill, whicS being signed with his name, as examined, after having his Majesty's Signet affixed to it, is directed to the Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal. 'Upon receiving this, the Clerk of the Privy Seal has a transcript of it prepared ; but previous to examining it, it is customary for him to send a Docquet, which in point of fact is a Copy of the Docqhet sub joined to the Bill, which is prepared by the Cleik of the Signet for the Royal Signature. This Docquet commences with the words following : " His Majesty's Warrant for issuing," &c. ace. and terminates, " Subscribed for Mr. by Warrant under his Majesty's Royal Sign Manual ;" countersigned by three Lords of the Trea sury. '1 his Docquet is compared with the Doequet to the King's Bill afotenibntioned; and the Clerk of the Privy Seal in wait* writes at the end of it " Examined," signing his name. Upon this being returned, signed by three Lords of the Treasury, list Letters of Privy Seal are compared with the Sweet Transcript, and being likewise signed by the said Clerk, are laid before the Lord Keeper, in order that the Privy Seal may be affixed thereto. —Our objection to signing the Letters of Privy Seal, therefore, was, that we conceived it would be departing front the official line of our duty, and acting contrary to the express letter and spi rit of our oath, if we signed these Letters of Privy Seal prior to the usual Docquet being returned to the Office, countersigned by three Loris of the Treasury. We considered this of the greatest importance, as we have always conceived the Docquet to be a Certificate under the hands of their Lerd.shipa, that the Royal Signature bad actually been affixed. Moreover, as the Lord Keeper always retain* the Signet, and' Docquet, as his vouchers for affixing the Seal ; and the entry of the Docquet is the only record remaining in the Office. The tenor of the oath 'sus follows: You shall be trite tp our Sovereign Lord the King, his heirs and successors, Kings and Queens of the united kingdoms of Great Britain and Ireland, and them faithfully serve to the best of your power, as one of their Clerks in the Office of Privy Seal ; antbduring rive time you shall continue in the same, you shell nut prefer nor colourably present to the , Keeper of the Privy Seak or Commissioners for t ite execution of the office of Keeper of the Privy Seal for the time being, any manner of thing to pass the Seal, but such only as you shall babe sufficiynt Warrant for, by Writing or by mouth granted or given by the Xing 's Majesty, or some of hi. Highness's Council in the Court of Requests.—You Shall not di*. close any of his Majesty's causes to you commanded to be kept secret, until such time as publication be thereof made.—And you shall not seek to break any order used for the attendance of the Clerks of the said office, or by colour thereof take any p growing by the Seal of the said Office, and thereby defraud awn of the whele due or any parcel thereof. " So help you GOD, and by the Holy Evangelists." (Signed) By the Clerk. This -- day of in the -- year of the reign of King George --, the said f bath taken the oath . above expressed, and subscribed hi. name before me t Keeper of the Privy Seal; and bath also taken the oaths ap. pointed by so Act of Parliament, intituled, " An Act f u r Attu satire the Oa t hs of Suprema c y Ad Alle giance , and appointin g other Oaths." ( signe d) § We have the honour to be, Sir, Your mat obedient luiommt i.aanit bi. i e Servant:, • j George Harrison, EN. Ste. &c. JOHN 14$. LA a PINT. • The Clerk of the Signet.—t Clerk's stame..-t Mere Insert Pie leper ' s same.-.-S do Lord Sum of tin Pziry Weal. 4 . t , r I 1,. • • MONISAY. JANUARY 7. PRICE OE ETocirs DAY AT Okg. O'Cl,Oca s per Cent. Cont. far tunnel+ and account, SG ea, dia. Reduced Ce#l-5 p.r Cent. Navy siSf es. arr.. • per (.sent. eqi—Meted. Ddle, s. to S.. pron. • Stable, 934. 24.. preen.—Ontnians 4H 426. • THE KING. " WINN IR CAME, JANUARY S, 1511. " His MAJESTY has passed another quiet night. and 'amain' very much in the same state as for someday. Fast." (Signed by all the five Physicians.) " 'WINDSOR CASTLE, JANUARY 6, 1811. 4 4 His MAJESTY has had several hours sleep in the 'sight, and is as well in all reset c:s as he was yester• day." (Signed) 4 1 lI.IHALPORD. W. lIERIMIAN. a. WILLIS." 0ft.1% 44 WINDSOR CASTLE, JANUARY 7. eg His MAJESTY is as well as he has been in any part of the preceding week, the whole of which Las -passed favourably." (Signed by all the Physicians.) SinEe our lasi-we have received German papers to the 30th, and French to the 31st ult. also Dutch jour. bah to the 2d instant. . t. - All shipping, bearing the flig of the United States, have been sequestered in the Russian ports, and by an Imperial Order of the Ist ult. the immediate sal* of thieWenerifte cargoes was (iirectesl to commence in Riga one week afterwards: These advices rather teod to weaken than conftfai the report of hostilities with Erance, but she letters from Konigsberg of the recent date of the 21st ult. advert to it with a confident ex. irctation of the event. • ;A new Decree has been issued by the Danish Co.. !Parlament, by which a trade with England is prohi. bited, under more severe penalties than any yet ijn. tatted by the cruel NaroteoN. It is declared a te. logy, punishable by death, in the capture of a ship maintaining intercourse with England. We have the satisfaction to state the capturi of 44 Dutch ship Gede FrOw,'of 450 tons, from Batavfa, bound to Bourdeaux, laden with colonial produce, by his Majesty's ship VALIANT, Captain It. D. Chaves, in coMpany with the Rimy, OAK, Lotd A. Bub- CLERC, and the VENERABLE, Sir HOME POPLIN'S. prie had been out 97 days, and, what is rather extraordi nary, had never bean chased during that time by 4I) i of our ships. On her making the land near Chasse. roll', she ran into Basque Roads, and made the signal for a pilot to take her into . Bout - area ; whereupon - the VALIANT hoisted French colours to entice Oaer nearer, which had the effect intended, as she went close alongside that ship ; and, upon a gnn heiox fired over her, .she struck her colours, and dropped Anchor. Her cargo, so far its it has yet been asccr. tained, is valued at 426,500, and consists of :336 730 lbs. Dutch cloves-911,423ab5. sugar-153,21614X5.' pepper—and 11,4961b5. red Java wood. It is no t . expected that the above will prove to be the whole of the merchandize she has on beard. FALMOUTH, JANUARY . t Arrived a 74, name unknown , the Trimmer cartel from Morlaix ; and the countess of Elgin cuttet : from Milford.—Wind E. N. 'E... PLYMOUTH, JANUARY Came in the Beromots man of war from Portsmouth Hero of the Mirth French privateer, of'll guns, prize to the BELLONA ; and the Marmaottouott man of war from Portsmouth. Sailed the Noon' STAR sloop df war with transports for Lisboa. Arrived laStasta frigate, Captain ATKINS. from a cruise. Came_ op harbour to repair the SAruste,'of 74 g uns. Wind E. Jae. 5.--Yesterday arrived the 14eymouth store ship, TRIBUNE frigate, and HAWK sloop of war from the Eastward. Sailed the WEAZLE SCILOOILET forFal mouth. This day arrived the DEXTEROUS Bern brig from Portsmouth. The Mary Cartel from Ports. mouth with French prisoners for Morlaix, pie in by the strong gales. PORTSMOUTH, JANUARY 4. Arrived his Majesty's ship GOSHAWK from a mire. Sailed the PILISLILOSZ sloop of war . for Cork. Willi North East. DOVER, JANUARY 1. The Ranger transport drove from the Downs, acid is on shore near our Pier-head, and it is feared will ht lost. A King's 'catch, with naval stores, came in in distress. DEAI„ JANUARY 4. Remains his Majesty's ships as per last. Wind N. E. blows hard. *Jaw. 6.—The Brothers transport that was on shore has gone to pieces. The Harmony, PtAcock, bound. to the Mediterranean, cut this morning and run t• Leeward. His Majesty's ships ride all well. RAMSGATE, JANUARY 6. Several casks have washed on shore. YARMOUTH, JANUARY 6. *On Friday evening, at six o'clock, a tremendona gale Irons the E.S.E. commenced, and continued all yesterday ; but this morning it does not blow so strong. The RAXGKR sloop and Kat gun-beig have now *spats of distress flying ; die f a rmer has cut away her masts, and the latter has thrown some at . her stores overboard, to prevent her striking at low water. The ATTACK gun-brig d: ore on shore yes terday morning, and the Mao gun.brig yesterday evening. The Susan, of Lynn, Him Master, with coals, a Dutch hoy, and a prize (foreign vessel) came. on shore last night. The crews of all the ships on shore, I am happy to sat, were all landed safe, thro' 1 the means of Captain Ma' urn 's invention,' and the I treachrnen, to whom great praise is due. The PERU. MN and Csianertn. cutters have cut away their masts, and are expected will ride out the gale, which 1 1 is now (one o'clock) eel much abated.—No arrivals since my last.—Wind E.S.E. CORN-MARKET, MARK -LANE, JAN. 7.--TheTharnes Navigation being stopped, there are no arrivals of Grain of any kind to-day, and not much remarning on hand s vessels not being able to discharge their car. goes very few buyers attended, or samples s and our prices quoted last week are considered nal, but Flour is mostly named at an advance of ss. per sack. FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE, le.. Average Price of Cure in England and Wall from ending ;Jae foal of Dcceniber, 1810. Wheat. . fiyo. Barley. Oars.' Beessa ' a. d. I pi e. d. 1 41 4., J. s. ti. c.,....A l 84 7 I 9 11 I 1?7 0 J.W. The averaOyilei • 4 vgar s romputeilTroeittlilF as He w0. .0 11 3 1 4*11 4 .1Ca8i1a7 ii I" 41141 - lill RI- I. d. is is Is made' 4WI