Star. — London, England, 1807-12-24 00:00:00

DUBLIN, DEC. 14. COMMISSION OF OYER AND TERMINER. This day Robert loner, Commander, Robert Robert:, Mate, and Francis Mendel:lbn, Steward of the Live/- pool packet called the Prince of Wales, appeared in enstri. befoye the Hon. Jullice Mayne and Pfflic/ Fletcher. _ _ _ _ Mr. M.lslat.i.v, their leading Counfel, Rated, than it appeared by attelled copies of warrants of com mittal, that the Captain ( Jones) was charged with having felonioufly and wilfully killed or murder d M'Lean, a Lieutenant in his Mejeßy's tBth regiment ; and that Robert Roberts and Franci) Henderfon, were committed for the murder of two of the private; of the fame regiment. Thefe com mittals were figned by the Superintendent Magif trate, and of comic mull have been founded on in formation taken on oath. He therefrke &fired to know if the inform ations were returned by the Ma giltrate, and if it was intended to found indictments on them. The CLER x of the Centre informed the Court that they were returned; but he had received orders not to fend up indictments. Mr. M'NALLY again obferved, that thole men had undergone a very long examine' i m before an emi nent King's Counfel, and had been confined under the Magillrate's warrant in Newgate, for upwards of a fortnight, when intimation was given to them that they fhould he bailed. This he advifed them not to comply with, and the next day they were difcharged by an order from the Magiarate, an or der which he conceived no Magi(lrate could make in a cafe of murder. It was an authority which the Court of King's Bench would not exercife. That Court could bail, but would not difcharge in cafe of murder, where informations were (worn ; no Magif trate fubordinate to a Judge could even bail in fuch a cafe. It might appear extraordinary that he fhould urge a trial ; but be did In upon the flrongefl convic tion that no charge could be fupported againft his clients. He did 10, becaufe confcious of their inno cence, he wifhed to clear their charaders from the fable and, fool afpertions thrown out againfl them in the public prints, and flrengthened by their impri fonment. A trial was nrceffarey to re efiablifh their reputation—it was neceffary as a bar to any future profecutionr that, in loch a cafe, they might have the benefit of pleading autre join acivit. They had been alto put to great expence in bringing witneffes from Liverpool and other places, and by employing an Agent and Counfel ; but probably Government in its wifdom and humanity would remunerate their pecuniary loffes. He conclude"! by laying, he could not frame any regular motion, but :null leave thofe unfortunate Englifirmen to the difcretion of the Judges. Junice MATHS GM, the Court could not intertere where the King's Attorney and Coroner declined profecuting—of coutfe nothing was done. Mr. Gottresss was on the fame fide ; but the Court having intimated their opinion,he did not think it necefrary to trouble their Lordihips. TUESDAY, DEC. 15. Matthew Donogboe was indiaed for the wilful mt der of Patrick Buckley, of Johnflown, by throwing him into the river Liffey, at Afton's (tap, in the month of September lati. The evidence produced was infufficient to Main the profecution, and the prifoner was acquitted. Richard la was inditted for the wilfu'. murder of Anne Lee, his wife, in James's-nreet, in the month of November lag, by giving her divers wounds with his hands and feet. No witnefs appearing on the part of the pore:l6°n, the prifoner was acquitted. Richard Hoare and David Parram, two foldiers, were indiaed for the wilful murder of Jahn Lindon, by nabbing him with a bayonet, at Strand-flreet, of which wound he infiantly died. The trial lined for Etveral hours ; and a ft er an eloquent and ingenious fpeech from Mr. M'NALLY, on behalf of the Prifoners, jullice MAY NE charged the Jury, who retired for a few minutes, and returned a verdia of—Manflaughter. DEC. lb—Four prifoners, Doyle, Borne, I tam. and llfulhall, were inditled for plundering a veifel named the Powell, on the 22d of November lan, to the value of tool. This veffel was wrecked during the late norms, on the [hand oppofite Merrion.— Several witneffes were examined, the tendency of whofe evidence went to prove that the motive of the Travetfers was merely to bring dead bodies on (bore, for which they were hired. No legal evidence ap peared fully ftrong to convia them, and the Traver fers were accordingly acquitted. Francis Mahon was found guilty of a burglary, committed at Garretflown, in which he and his affo ciates broke their way through the thatch of the peafant's cabin, who profecuted them. Pigot flood charged on three indiaments, on one of which he was found guilty of a burglary, for entering the houfe of a Mrs. Tracy, who keeps lodg ings at Dundrum, on the 14th of Odlober laft. Mils Moore, who identified the prifuner as one of two who had a blundetbufs, and had entered the houfe about three o'clock in the morning, and parlied upon honour with feveral ladies there, to deliver him and his affociates all the money they had. This lady was very circumftantial as to the prifover's move ments after he had entered the houfe, received feve. ral fums, not to a great amount, in notes, filter, and brafs. The prifoner proved to have been a quondam fetvant to Colonel La Touche. COIll MARICIT, MARK Laws, DECEMBEI 23. The market to-day was very thinly fupplied with Wheat, an 3 the few fates effeEted were nearly'at our lall cur rency—Barley middling fupply, and goes off readily ---Malt keeps its price, tine new about Boe. pet qr.— Beans of each dcfeription rather lower. The fupply of Oats is likewife thort, and this trade appears at more advance—Flour without alteration, tine Ame rican 401. to 435. per barrel. ORM ORAL CURRANCT A 9 rk19191. Wheat, 50$ boa yes per 511'. Grey Peas. toes 70S cd Ent Ditto. 75$ od Beans, (old) s6ae d Rye, (new) ens sas od Tick Ditto sae sgs od Barley, ecs 451 cd 0at1,33s 38s eas Malt, (old) bcs 70s od Poland ditto 43144 s od White Peas, (Boilers) rsos 16:s Potatoc ditto to 46s cd Rape Seed sal 261 Fine Flour Sys 6cs--Seconds soe sss COAL MARKET, December 23. Sblpi at Market Ships fold Price 30 Neweaftle Coal 9 sos od so stls a Sunderland a 48s od to ste od LAW 1117LLIGENCE. CO RT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. xB. rrearato V. LORD ceravitea. This w is an atlion brought by the plaintiff, as owner of a South Sea whaler called the William Fenning. 'Tahiti the 11 . ght lionout able Lord Gren ville, who (being reliauary legatee of the late Lord ramelford) is the owner of another South Sea whaler tiled the Catrwent. The action was in trover for the value of half a whale, which the plaintiff claimed to be entitled to, and which be elledged that the defendant, Lord Grenville, had converted to his own ufe. Mr. Serjeant BEST liatid,,on the part atilt plain tiff, that his claim relied on the ellablifhed ufages and regulations of the Booth Sea whaling veffela.— The c'itlom of this May is, that limed one veffel throw a harpoon into a whale, and another veffel immediately afterwards come up and kill that whale, it is to be divided between them. The Learned Counfel Paid, he fhould prove that this has been the conliant ufage in the South Sea whale filhery, al though different rules prevailed in the Greenland filhery, fr om the diffetence of circum ft ances. If fuch were the exiling law, founded upan the ufage of the filhery, it would be no queflion either for Ju ties or Judges to fay whether the law were right or not, but only to pronounce as the law Rood. The cullom, however, appeared to him to be very rea. (unable, and fomething like that which was con- Randy praaifed in this country with tripe& to fptinging game. The kind of harpoon which was ufed in this inflance, and which was very commonly tiled, was called a drag, beeaufe it has a buoy or piece of wood of from one to two feet fquare attach. ed to it by a fhort rope. This piece of wood, floating on the water, bath (hewed where the (truck whale was, and impeded its ;mirage through the water, and thus prevented its efcape. In the month of June, tilos, the veffels cf the plaintiff and defendant were fifhing near each other in the South Seas, when Captain Law, of the plaintiff's veffel, having wound ed a large whale with one of thufe drag harpoons, had fixed another harpoon (which was attached to his boat by a towline) into a (mall whale. When the defendant's boat approached, he hailed her, and told the Captain the courfe which the large whale had taken. The defendant's crew then killed the larger whale, and the Captain being aficed, accord. ing to the cullom of the trade, for half the whale, refufed to give it ; and it therefore became neceffaty to try the quellion at law. As it was evident that the (hiking the whale with this drag-harpoon pre vented its efcape, and affifted confiderably in taking it, it was alto clear, and Rood to reafon, that thofe who fo affilled fhoald be rewarded for the affißance they had given. The extent of the reward would depend upon the cuflom of the trade, and he would thew that it was one half of the Sib. Captain Law, the commander of the plaintiff's veffel, proved his having (truck the large whale with a drag harpoon, and that, after its being (truck, it did not proceed farther than zoo yard► before it was killed, and cut up by Captain Anthony, who was in the boat of the defendant's veffel, and to whom he had waved his hat for aftillance. The eirta generally produced by firikinra whale with this drag-harpoon is, that it Rays for a confiJerable lime nearly in the fame place, ;skiing, (or, as he explained it, melts. Touring to extricate Hell from the harpoon) ; and that independent of this effea, its firength is walled, its (peed diminifhed, and its place in the water af; ccrtained by this floating piece of wood ; and it there fore becomes an eafy prize to any me who may come up. The witnefs alto tellified as to the cutlom concerning the property in the fills caught, as Rated by the Connie!. Captain Holcrowe, who Paid he had been in the Snnth Sea whale filhery for nineteen years. alto de clared it to be the odium to divide the filh in fuch cafes. Captain Dagg was acquainted both with the Green labd and the South Sea whale filhery. In the Green ' land filhery, there was no fuch rule, as the whales were larger and leis eafily killed by a harpoon, and the ice prefented other obtlacles. They therefore did not ufe the drag•harpoon in the Greenland filhery ; but in the South Sea filhery, the rule was what had been before Rated. A very confiderable number of old Captains in the SJuth Sea filhery proved this cullom. Some of them flared that they had been waked on by Lord Grenville's Solicitor, and had told him what the caftom was. The cafe for the plaintiff being denied, Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD relied for a nonfvit, on the ground that an aftion of trover would not lie, as the whole was an undivided property, of which (by the plaintiff's evidence)they were tenants in common. If the filh had been divided into two halvae and the fhares affigned, then the plaintiff might bring trover for his moiety. Sir JAMES MANSFIELD laid, that he felt that legal objetlion to be a very Rrong one. Mr. Serjeant BEST requelled that the caufe might go to the Jury on its merits, and that the point of law might be laved. He had too great a refpe& for Lord Grenville to fuppofe it polfible that, if he were defeated on the merits, he could confent to move the Court upon filch a point. He was lure his Lordfhip could not know that fuch an objeaion would be taken, and that it was the ad merely of his agents. Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD allowed that Lord Gren ville did not know any thing of it ; but that if he did, Lord Grenville was only one of the defendants, as hit Captain, and the crew of his veffel, were alto interefled, and Lord Grenville bad no right to give up their interelt. Lord Grenville was entitled to a larger (hare ; yet the meane.l perfon on board had a right to have.their interefts protetied. Mr. Serjeant &sitar read the admiffloos in the cattle, and the letter of Lord Grenville's Solicitor, ofroing to try the quellion on its merits. If. rfter there, the defendant were to take advantage of thofe points, it would be completely taking the plaintiff by furpr ize. Sir James MANSFIELD faid,that whatever might be his opinion cf the objettion, he would allow the caulk to go on, as oue of the witneffes had Paid the whale belonged to the perfon that fita !truck it. If the whale was his (although by the cußom he mutt give half of it to fomebody tile) then trover would lie. Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD then addreffed the Jury at eonfiderable length, and with great ability, on behalf of the defendant. He (aid he timid prove, by widielres as rekeEtAble and experienced a; the plaintiff's witnefes, that the cultom was, that a whale (ruck by a drag harpoon was conlidered a 4( loofe fins ;" but that a whale (ruck by a harpoon which was attached by a tow line to a boat, was the property of the *del to whjch the boat belonged.— This cuttom was founded in rearm) ; for the whale which was attached to a harpoon that was aCtually connefted with the boa►, was as much in the pallet= flan of that boat's c►ew, as a filh that is upon the hook furpended to the line of a Ming rod. If (hik ing whales with drag harpoons were to give a right to half the whale, the indullricus and!nterprifing Merman would be no better off than the idle and rather timid. All the danger that there wgs in the whale filbery was from the fifb when (truck by a hat goon from a tow line, for then the boat was often (love in by a (troke of the whale. If perfons thought they had nothing to do but throw the drag harpoons, without venturing to follow the filh, the real whale filhers would be deprived of that fair earnings. He trulled he fhould prove that there was no fuch cuflom as that fet up by the plaintiff, and that, in point of law, the verdiU mull be for his client. On the part of the defendant, Captains Scott, Chriftie, Bunker, and Q2ellie wtre produced. By their tellimony, it appeared that the cull-m, until the !aft two or !three years, was what had been timed by the plaintiff's witneltes ; but that abut two or three pears ago, the Captains ot the different whalers on the fame Ration ufed to meet together and fettle rules and regulations, and that theii'gerie. TA rule now was, not to allow this privilege to drag harpoons. At the Galliepago Minds, where this HI was Ilrack, the whales went in large fhoals ; and if this rule were adhered to, one boat's crew might wound a number of whales without taking the trouble to follow them. At prefent, even when a whale was fituck with a tow line harpoon, if the Rrikers gave up the porfuit, it was reckoned a bole fills, and the next boat that came up mi ? ht take it. Captain Law was then called again, and Aced by his Lord(hip, whether he had agreed to the regula lions that the Captains of the other whalers at the Galliepagos had made ? He anfwered pofttively that he had not, and that he went on the old ufages of whaling. Serjeant BEST (poke in reply. • Sir JAMB S MANSFIELD told the Jury , that if the ;Captain had entered into any agreement with the other Captains on the fubjed, be mut have been b.nnd by that agreement ; but as he had pofitively denied ir, and there was no proof of his haying known of thole new rules, or having acquiefced in them, he ; could not be bound by them. Whetter the new rules were more equitable than the old 'ones, was not now , the quelion ; but as they were very lately intro ; duced, the Captain, if he knew nothing of them, had a right to confider that be was Sating under the old rules and ufages of whaling. Verdid for the plaintiff.—Damages to be referred. PARER 22 ..-WILLIAMS V. NUNN I,ND REYNOLDS This was an due from the Court of Chancery, to try a fimple Net, namely, whether the plaintiff had committed an as of bankruptcy. In order to bring the matter forward in a proper manner, the aftiun was brought by Williams againtl the D:fendants, who had been the petitioning creditors, for a trefpafs committed by them, in takic'g ()tit a falfe corn mifGor, under the authority of which the plaintiffs goods and effetts had been feized. 'lire care was opened to are Jury by Mr. Serjeant Brsr He defcribed the plaintiff as carrying on bufi. nefs in Dublin, in the year 18:4, with a partner, under the film of Williams and Morgan. It ap• peared that a gentleman, named Clarke, of Olney,. in Buckinghamfhire, had, through the medium of a houfe in Noble flied, Cheapfide, (Edward Mor gan and Co.) fent the plaintiff a quantity of goods, amounting to upwards of 12001. The Plaintiff, in the latter end of silos, came to London, in order in adinfl the accounts of Williams and Morgan, f Dublin, with Edward Morgan and Co. of London, as the former copat tnerfhip was about to he dill ived. On Saturday, the loth of November, in that year, a meeting took place in the evening, between the plaintiff, Mr. Morgan, of London, and Mr. Reynolds, in order to an arrangement of the affairs of the Company in Dublin with their creditors, as at that time that concern was confiderably em barraffed. What paired at that meeting did not trail. fpire, but a witnefa (wore he heard the meeting break up, Mr. Williams wifhing Mr. Reynolds good night, and promifing to meet that gentleman again on the neat Monday morning at ten o'clock. The plaintiff, however, did not keep his promife of meeting Mr. Reynolds on the Monday, hut went off in the mean time to Dublin, in order to avoid an arrell from Mr. Clarke. He left his wife and chiLiren in his houfe, in the New Rents, in St. Martin'. le Grant, and had been heard to fay in Dublin, that he ih Add with to revilit London on their account, butt was afraij to d fo, dreading an arrell from Clarke. In the cootie of the trial, it appeared that the name of the plaintiff remained all the time of his abfence, on hi, door in the New Rents, in St. Martin's leGrand ; that his name was annexed to all invoices, &c. as ; alfo, that the rent and taxes were regularly paid in the fame way as if the plaintiff had been at home. The queflion then became, whether the plaintiff, by leaving his family and houfe in London, to (bun an at refi from Clarke, had not committed an at of bankruptcy Mr. Serjeant BEST, after the evidence was doled, addreffed the jury upon the point. He laid, that upon the verdia of the jury, ihould it plf. againfl the plaintiff, a material queflion in law, firlajed to the after decifion of the Court, would wife. It was at prefent infifted upon, that the plaintiff's going to Ireland, in order to avoid an arrell, was an at of bankruptcy—but he contended that the plaintiff, in quitting London and going to Dublin, did noTuch thing. He had no concern with the Company in London, Dublin was him home, and the place where his friends refided. Had there been any foundation for Clarke's arrefl,he could have eafily executed it in Dublin, but there the plaintiff could have.given bail which he could not have done in London, had he been there arrefted. The Learned Serjeant alto contended, that under thefe cir cumaances, the plain tiff had not violated the Bankrupt AO, in abfenting himfelf from his dwelling. Uzi man was domiciled in London, and left his abode to Ihun an arrell, he undoubtedly committed an all of bankruptcy. He fhould not wafte more time on the matter, but it was kis duty to Rate, that this was nothing leis than a cor,fptraey, againfl the plalatifF f.r ilte pnrpo(e cj his utter ruin. He had r.ld .micile in Great. Britain, and, was he not afraid of fatiguing the jury, he could very eafily explain the circundlance of his name remainine OR his bottle in the New Rents. Could it then be (aid that this unfortunate, man had committed an a& of bankruptcy ? Was it Paid he had a home in England ? He believed not. The fad was, that the articles diffolving partnerfhip is Dublin, fpecify in the firongeß 'and moll pirated term", that his refiderce—his only refidence—and place of abode, where he was always to be found by his creditors, was the city of Dublin, and no where elfe on the face of the earth. Had it been proved . that the Plaintiff had fled to difappoint a kill debt ? No fuch thing. But he had gone out of the way to etcape the dreadful effee, of a vile confpiracy again* hint. Neither was it prtved, that the debt due to Clarke was fuch as could entitle that gentleman to arreft him ; on the contrary, that debt was owing to Clarke by Morgan aLd Williams, as a Company; and not by the Plaintiff as an individual. Sir ALAN Cu Ala naE, is the abfence of Sir Jams Miami en (i :difpofed thiough a cold) addreffeci the Jury. He minutely recapitulated the evidence; ftom which I e ftid filet e could be no doubt but that the Plain; iff had committed an ad of bankroptcy.— His Lordfh'p thought there was a fallacy in the ar, gument of the Learned Serjeant, who had fuppreffed the words of the Statue. The Plaintiff was not only accufed of departing the realm alone, but with the intentii n of ileftating the jai claims of his creditor's. Betides, the Aa entailed a punithment on all natural born fubjeas of the realm who commit Inch offences. —The Jury, without hefitation, found a verdid for the Defendant. MA kRIE 1). Turklay laR, at Faveriham, by the Rev. the Dean of Weßrninft Rer, W S Currey, ETq• Major in the 54th regiment, to Mils Anna Maria Tappcnden, daughter of jamcs Tappeades, Efq. of that I lac:. DR.FREhMAN's OU'ITA SALUTARIS. I'HE value ~ 1 this Infallible Medicine has been-cf long proved, that nothing of the prefeat day caw beat a competition with it in all the different Rages of a certain biker( ' which it cffidually cures and eradicates from the habit, without exciting the painful feelings And expo:ice that attends falivation. without debilitating the couttitution in any degree, or even re• gutting confinement front bufinefs, or reftrietion in diet. The radical virtues of there ineftimable Drops have proved their chins to public approbation fur more than thirty years. In all tbele.. hairy of bath foxes, they prove a never failing reftorative, wha cher the debility is produced by too free ufe of Mercury, illicit plea'ures, or the effects of a warm climate to travellers, and thole going abroad. They cannot ha recomenerided too arcingly to thdle who will receive a raft. fpeetly.and complete este in all old ftubborn Gleeti, and every wcaknefs that affeas the blacitirr and organs of trine By its efficacy many women have become me ems who for years had been deprived of that happinefs Sold wholefale and retail at Mr. Butler's, No. aiehcaPrifkicer ner of Paternofter.row, and retail byßelam, Portfinouth; Welton; Potties.; Vi'i:ls and Rogers, Plymouth; Peck, Hull; Daiwa, bobs ! lin; Macdonald, Clufgow ; Smith aad Maaderton, Edinburgh: and by molt country medicine venders, in bottles, at as. 91. each, with anvle dirrctions. PUBLIC ADVANTAGE. 'HE advantage the public tneti always derive from regularly educated profeffional men diredingaisnoft et clufively their ftudies to one !pecks of malady, was never more clearly detnonarsted than by tbe unexampled fume's which hat attended the admioittration of their new remedy, and the extra ordinary cures it has performed. Fora long feriesof years, Merry CURRIE and Co. Surgeons, formerly in Ms klajeftes fervico. have made the Verereat Difeafe the particular ',Neel of tbdr in- , veßigation, and ate happy in having difcovered a medicine Supe rior to mercury in the cure of that complaint—it is (ufficient va• obferve that the died, of this remedy are diametrically oppolAte to theft of mercury ,for though it completely eradicates tory vellige-- 4 the virus, in its moll eco.Srmed fthges, yet it does not io the kat injure the eacilituti- n--on the contrary, it renovates the fyl tem in all its natural funaions, promotes appetite, and facilitates digeftion—thus inftead of reducing a arnng and vlgoroata toed**. tine to the frightful condition that mercury does, it not only pro (ova that enniiitution in Its primitive State, but reitores a weak and debilitated one to its natural itreogib and vigour. Numberlefa itflonees are on 'went record ache filmier efficacy of this Medicine, its Inherent and fperific virtues ading as a per. pctual correct ive to bodily debility, whether proceeding from an excers of conjugal or illicit pleafare, or from the more infiduous, thcugb not fell dellruttive indulgence of Lama &us youth of toes texts in a certain pernicious habit Amid* the melat.choly variety of throttler, which are the confetutroca or this fe Wary vice, there are none more affliaing than that ffiftreiling t Rate o f debility and deficiency, which prevents or embittess theme ' trimonial Rate ; the unhappy (offerer broods over his misfortune-- 1 alamed to fear relief, until be is reduced to fuck Rate of weak ! nes as to rendetlife oppreffive. To Nett perfons It muff be a con foling reffedion, to kuow that they may now, by a new infallible mode of treatment, be reftored tofthat greateftof all human bio g. logs ' a ftroog , manly , and vigorous con ititution. In all cafes of debility, deficiency, front whatever eaufearifing. 1 as well* in every Species ef vecerml ir.fiedion, Mears Currie anti I Co. may be confulted by patients of either fez, with the greatat I fecrecy and !valour, at their bottle, No. sc7, Hatton Garden. Letters from the Country (port paid) including a bank nom/ will have the neceffary medicine and advice fent to any part of the • Kingdom. No. Loy. Hatton Gerdes. The Rev. Mr. BARCLAY . ' PATENT ANTIBILIOUSPILLg. 1 . was a remai k of the celebrated Dr. Buchan. L Author of the Corneille, Medicine, that complaints of the ilomach and bowels are the prevailing malady of this country, which lay the foundation of the more formidable and fatal 4,11-• cafes ; that the perfon who could difeover for the relict and cure a fafe and infallible remedy would verfnem a mat important (revive to fociety. That thfcovery has now been made is the Patent Antibiliuus Pills of the Rev. Wilhsrn Barclay, the extenfive Cale of which, and the h eh till:ration in which they arc defervedly bele. has confiderahly ltfimed the number of thefe cornplaintu; and bide, fair, iu a Churl time, to be the memo( entirely eradicating them Theft Pills have a quick and fare operation, they ad powerfuTig and fpecifically on the bile, and thus remove the numerous &harder' eannedted with it.fick headaches, flatulence, liver cemplaints,jana dice, nervous diforders from indigelli.rn, &c. They are the sacs valuable family medicine hitherto offered to the Public and the Preprletor is fu:poi ted by the moil refpt dtable .evidence of the firit chandlers of the Nobility and others, that they hawescuer been adminidered to any petfon without giving certain and (psody relief, and in the end completing a cure This valuable medicine, having been ufed with fuceefs, is rector: — wended by the following iliilinguifhed Perfunage. The Right Hon Vircon in DI L I.ON The Lord 13ifhop of BATH and WFt.I.S . Sir JOHN HON EYWOOD, Bart. M P. fo' Ironic= Sir sTLIIHEN LUSHINGTON, Bart. M.P for Penrye THOMAS ANSON', Efq. M P. for latch& Id. JAMES AMYATT.Efq. M.P. for Southsmpton NICHOLSON CALVERT. Efq. M.P. for Hereford EDMUND 801. HM. Efq. New-ilrect, String-garde* THOMAS HAM a4E9.SLEY, Efq Pall-fvlall G. W. DICKES. Efq. Private &ecstasy to the Archbiihop of Canterbury I Tbe Rev. Mr. DIMOCK, Librarian to the Arefibilhop . _ CECIL FORRE • I'ER. EN M.P. for Wenlock Sold wly..h.fale and retail by Mr. Butler, No. 4. Cluatpfide, corner of Paternofter.row ;and retail by M r.KirLy, Stafford Brett, Old Bond ftreet ; Mr. Stratton. Leiceltur lipase; and by all re. fpeel..4ble Venders it. Town and Country. A Cantion--Obfcrue the name of William Barclay is Ingructl on the Ramp, which is affixed on the otafide wrapper of each box ; all not fo (tamped are a dangerous imitation. Price 51.66. and tea. per tans, with ample diredicsas. I • - LONDON: Printed mid ruNifhed by LEVRL VINT, (of Car. rerbury-Plue, Lambeth) at the STA it4)rmi, 1, raw' Rivet, Ptiblithed Oro at tLe STA a•na rick, remple-Ban,.