Star. — London, England, 1807-05-26 00:00:00

I LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. MAY it. SMITH V. JAMI 3. This was an aftion of affault. The plaintiff is an aniioneer and appraifer, and the defendant an aunt ney. The latter had the management of an ellate ,atWitney, in Oxfordibire, and went down to eflimate . tome dilapidations made by an outgoing tenant. It was agreed that two perfons (hould be called in to .treprefent the contending interetts, and fettle the da• images. The plaintiff was one of thole, and the de fendant objecting to come part of his condutt, words - enfued ' • the plaintiff called the defendant a liar , and • the defendant, in return, kicked him out of the room. TI le Jury recompeafed this injury by giving aftillitig damages. ROBIRTS D. CAMDEN. 'lite Plaintiff is an Attorney, at Hollowell, in Flint fliire ; the Defendant is a Gentleman of fortune in Oar neighbourhood. This was an action for slander. After Mr. Sceset.avr had ripened the pleadings, !The ATTORNEY GENERAL, for the Plaintiff, laid that this was an example of the molt foul and male volent calumny that could difgrace the records of the Court. A namefake of the Plaintiff was under fome derangement in his affairs, and it became neceffary that they Mould be invelligated. The Plaintiff un dertook this bufinefs profeflionally, and in fulfilling his duty, he had occafion to go to Dublin, to attend various meetings of arbitrators, and to go through involved and intricate accounts. For all this bufinefs the whole charge was only 1301. Roberts could not or would not pay the bill; he endeavoured, therefore, to fight off, as the phrafe was, and for this purpofe he required that the Bill fhould be taxed by the Pro thonotary ; but, in the feqticl, it was not taxed at all. On this short and plain Rory was founded the calumny, mifreprefenting every fait. The Defendant propagated, through all Hollowell, and its vicinity, that the Plaintiff had promif-d to Mrs. Roberts, the wife of the perfon for whom he ailed, to charge no thing for all this laborious exertion, and yet that he had railed an extravagant bill of I 501. which, how. ever, being examined, was reduced to 501. having been taxed by the Chief Jußice and another Judge, who reprimanded the Attorney publicly in Court. [Bills ire not taxed by the . Judges, but by certain Officers of the Court appointed for that purpofe.] There could not be a more impudent dander, and invented again& a perfon whole livelihood depended upon the purity and integrity of his character. In this fituation, the Plaintiff could not continue his em ployment, without taking Reps to reftore his injured reputation. For this purpofe he wrote a letter to the Defendant, (trongly infißing that there was no ground for the calumny, and defiring that it might be contra• diCled. The application produced a dry, and infolent anfwer. The Plaintiff again expollulated, defying' the Defendant to prove his charges ; and demanding, that if he could not prove them, he would retraft them. The Learned Counfel would read the reply, becanfe no excefs of credulity in the minds of the Jury could lead them to fuppofe that be Rated from memory correaly the contents. 4 ' Sir—Upon the receipt of your letter, it was my intention to have had fat6faetion of you for the opprobrious language and epithets you have ufed of me. But wilhful Brit, for my own gra tification, to inveftigate further the anecdote which I had in the courfe of converfation related, I called again upon Mr. Gryffith Williams, who confirmed again the whole ; and farther informed me, that he had diredtions from the Attorney General to prole cute you for perjury. Until you have cleared yourfelf of this Im putation, I cannot look upon you as a Gentleman ; and muft difmifs you with the epithet of a feoundrel, which your condudt to me merits. Your's, &c. 3d July, tBe6.'• The Plaintiff (continued the Learned Counfel) had complied with that requifition of the Defendant, and be came to an Engliffi Jury to relieve himfelf from a charge (o unjuß and oppreffive to his feelings. The words would be proved, and the letter '-could be pro duced. The fallity of there affertions being evident, - it appeared further, that the Plaintiff, at the time the original action was brought,' was only an Attorney belonging to the Court of Great Sellions, in Wales, and laid the venu in Middlefex—When, upon applica tion to the Court, on behalf of the Defendant, it ap pearing that the tranfaflion was a local matter, and the parties all living in Wales, the venu was changed to the county in which the tranfaBion took place.— The Plaintiff difcontinued that atlion, and, having previoufly procured himfelf to be made an Attorney of this Corer, he brought a fecond action, and laid the venu in Middlefex, being then entitled to do fo, whereby the Defendant was put to a very confider able expence, in bringing Witncffes from Wales. It alfo appeared, that a Mr. Griffith Williams was the perfon wno informed the Defendant of the whole of this tranfadtion. Nothing, (laid the Attorney Ge neral) could exceed the hardfhip upon the Plaintiff, excepting, indeeid, the hard malevolence of the De fendant. Mr. James Ewer being examined by Mr. GARROW, laid, that Mr. William - Williams, Colonel Hughes, and the Defendant, having dined at his houfe, loon after the ladies had withdrawn, the Defendant ob ferved, that •' Roberts' conduct was not better than that of other Attornies, for that he had offered to Mrs. Roberts to tranfall her law bulbuls for no. thing : but after this, notwithitanding his profeffions of ft iendfhip, he had brought in an exorbitant charge of 15o1.; which bill was afterwards taxed, and re duced to sot. but not without a revere reprimand from the Court." The witnefs further laid, that the fame language was repeated by the Defendant at the public Billiard room, who added, that Gryffith Williams confirmed the whole, producing at the fame time a copy of the letter which had been read by the Learned Counfel. On his crofs-examination, he laid, that the cenverfation was held on the aoth of June ; he did not recollect that it was introduced by fome talk about a little Ft ench milliner, but the name of Madam Coberge was mentioned, with whom, it was Paid, that Mr. Gryffith Williams bad fome flirtation. Mrs. William Williams, in the prance of the wit. stet, told the Plaintiff of the calumnious expreffions ufed by the Defendant. Mr. William Williams being called, confirmed the leading patticulars &ft Rated. The Defendant Paid the more the Plaintiff furred in the bufinefs, the worfe it thonld be for him. On his crofs examination, the witnefs laid, that Mr. Gryffith Williams being in the next vain with Madame Coberge, when Roberts the Plaintiff made the offer to Mrs. Roberts, he Gryffith Williams flipped behind the curtain, and heard the converfation. The fun began with the little French milliner. Mr. Tomlin, fr.rthe Defendant, complained th a the Plaintiff had made himfelf an aterAsey cf this Court on purpofe to bring the Orion here by.l.ih pri• vilege in that charafter. •The confequtnee was, that if the Plaintiff obtainei a verdia of only one fhillitig. the Defen lant would have alfo to defray the cuffs, including the attendance of witneffes, which would amount to between 3001. and vol. This calumny, ; which had been magnified into importance by the powerful eloquence of the Attorney General, was con ne&ed with a frivolous dialogue about a little French ; and a ridiculous trick of Mr. Griffith Wil liams, in playing at hide and leek behind the curtain. Was it confiffent with truth and juftice to aggravate to loch an extetit a difpute between a couple of fiery Welchmen, who knew nothing of the phlegmatic ha bits of their EaCern neighblurs? The learned Counfel hoped that the Jury would confider the fmallelt da mages more than a fufficient reparation under fuch circumflances. Lord Et.t.rmanantrosi, after Rating the nature of the anion, commented at ()me length both on the conduit of the Plaintiff and of his witneffes. He did not blame the former for being careful of his reputa tion, but he ought rather to have fought redrefs in damages from Mr. Griffith Williams, if the fcandal originated with him. His Lordfhip laid, he fhould not have thought it neceffary, in a confidential or carelefs communication of this kind from the Defeo dint, to have immediately informed tke Plaintiff of the fubjed of it; as the witneffes had done : he would rather have cautioned the Defendant, and would have fufpended imparting the flander to the Plaintiff, until it was feen that the Defendant perfevered in propagating the calumny with obffinacy and malevo. lence.—VerdiEl for the Plaintiff, tot. MAY 22.—HOGGART V. COOYSR• This was an aaion for goods fold and delivered. The plaintiff and hct finer are milliners and drefs makers in New Bond Rreet, and the defendant is a Lieutenant in the Eaft Kent Militia. The fum claimed was 971. the balance of a bill for articles of drefs furnithed to the defendant's wife. Mr. PALK, who .fiated the cafe to the Jury, admit ted that the queflion for the confide, ation of the Jury would be, whether the drefs and articles furnifhed to Mrs. Cooper were Nimble and neceffary to her con dition in life ? He faid the lady, at the time the gave the orders, was living in the houfe of Colonel Durand, and not the haft fufpicion relied on her character. In ten months the was furnifhed with different articles of drefs, to the amount of 1471. out of which Sol. had been paid. One of the dreffea in particular was ex tremely rich ; it was trimmed with broad lace, and was charged 241. This, he underßood, the defendant meant to object to, and yet it mutt be confidered that Mrs. Cooper was a very large woman, and took an , immenfe deal of lace to her clothes, which, as they were made to cover her, were large in propor tion ; not that he knew it was abfolutely neceffery that the clothes of a fafhionable woman &mid en• tirely cover her. He alfo undertlood that it was meant to be let op, that the Lady was living in a Rate of adultery with ths Colonel at the time the credit was given, and that the hatband was not liable to her debts. If that was the cafe, he would take upon him felf to afrert, that it was unknown to the plaintiffs ; and that, in point of fail, the cafe, as he bad before obferved, woulfl refolve itfelf into the queßion Whether the articles furnithed were necetrary to her condition, as the law was fuppoied to take care of the hufband's interells in his abfence, and would not al- low his wife neceffaries above his condition ? Lord ELLENBOROUGH ge What is the actual rank and condition of the Defendant ?" Mr. GARILOW" My Lord, he is a Lieutenant in the EaR Kent Militia, at 41. 6d. per day." The Plaintiff's Counfel then called Mifs Hoggart, who Rated that her fitter fucceeded to Mifs Ireland's bufinefs in Bondlreet ; and that Mrs. Cooper, Mrs. Durand, and Mrs. Pope, the fitter of the latter, were all cußomers. Mrs. Cooper's bill, from the Bth of January to the 26th of October in the fame year, was 1471. out of which Sol. had been paid. The drelfes were fent to Mr. Durand's bottle at Ceram'. ton- Lord ELLIINSOROVGH obferved, that if the De fendant's condition had been truly defcribed, he was I confident the Jury would think that pl. expended in dreffes, in the Goode of ten months, was amply fulEcient for the wife of a man in his Ration ; and if fo, that fum bad been already paid, and it was unneceffary to go into the dillreffing hitiory of the fa mily tranfiraions of the parties. The Jury expreffed themfelves of that opinion, and gave a verdict for the Defendant, without proceeding further in the caufe. BOUGHTON V. BOUGHTOIS. This was an iffue directed from the Court of Chan cery, to try whether Eliza, the natural daughter of Sir Edward Boughton, Bart. deceafed, was legally married, on the loth Auguß, 1798, to her prefent hufband, Sir Charles George Braithwaite Boughton. The deceafed, Sir C. Boughton, was the father of Lady Boughton, by a perfon who cohabited with him as his wife for many years, and by his lei will he bequeathed the great bulk of his property to Eliza Lady Boughton, with refiriaion; upon the perfon who thould become her hufband, that he thould take the name of Boughton. Eliza, ~ow Lady Boughton, being about to be married to her prefent hufband, Sir George Charles Braithwaite Boughton, then Mr. George Charles Braithwaite, not being more than twenty years of age, and having no natural parents or tenementary guardians, the law requii ed that the thould have the content of guardians appointed by 1 the Court. Mrs. Ann Rutherford and Mr. Richard Sandilands were accordingly appointed guardians by the Court for that purpofe ; they gave their full approbation, and the parties were married by fpecial licence, at St. George's, Hanover fquare, on the zoth Auguß, 1798. 1 here facts were admitted by the ATTONRET• GINERAL) as Counfel for the Defendants, who, in his defence obferved, that by the Statute of the 46th of George 11. it was enaaed, that a minor, under the age of at years, thould have the confent of his or her father, if living ; if otherwife, of his or her guardian or guardians; or in want of thefe, of his or her mother, or of guardians appointed by the Court. In this cafe he should prove, that Lady Boughton was born in wedlock, and that her legal father was alive at the time the was married. Mr. James Kirg was then called, and depofed, that he was preicnt at the marriage of Mr. John Kay, with the mother of Lady Boughton, Salowie Davis, on the 18th January, yipt. lib tievei kniw they 1 had any family; and fume time after "he underarms! Sal , nic Davis, then Kay, left her ?intend, and went to live with Sir Edward Boughton until the died.:-= Mr. John Kay was's - dive within Ode three years. Mi..GARROW, for the IPtaintiffiliid, he could not give any anfwer to.this ; and the Jury, accordingly, found a verdia for the Plaintiff ; that—" Lady Eliza Boughton was not legally married on the loth Anent!, 1798." By this verdia, all the marriage fettlements pre vious to the marriage, are made void, and the eldea child of the marriage is illegitimate ; but it does not affeft the domeßic arrangements any farther, as the panics were fubfecprently re-married. RANSOM V. r i nclacsoar• This was an aElion upon a promiffory note, for 0001. with interat &c. brought by the plaintif f s, Marrs. Ranfom and Co. Bankers, Pall Mall, againa the defendants, Merrs.Donbleday and Eafterby, emi nent merchants, reeding at Newcaßle-upon.Tyne. It appeared, on the part of the Plaintiff, that the Bill was drawn by the defendants in favour of Meff. Burdon and Co. late Bankers, by whom it was indor fed to the prefent plaintiffs, for value. The ATTORNEY GENRRAL, on behalf of the de fendants, refitted this adlion upon feveral grounds, tome of which were as 101 l rw :—Fira, becaule the drawer had not regular notice of the nonpayment. Secondly, becaufe the note was originally given to Burdon and Co. as a collateral fecurity for a fum of money long fince paid off and difcharged.— Thirdly, that the plaintiffs had notice of the nature of this promiiiory note from Burdon and Co. who defired it to be placed to the debit of their account and lailly, in an account furniflied upon a vat iety of money tranfaftionc, to the amount of feveral thou feuds of pounds, this bill was not charged. Lord ELL N BOROUGH, upon hearing the nature of the defence, intimated that it was a cafe fit for arbi tration. The parties immediately affented, and a verdia was agreed to be taken for to,oool. in order to cover the whole of the Counts in the Declaration. LONDON MARKETS. CORN EXCHANGE, MARK-LAN S t MAY 25. °SHIRAI. CURSINCT AS uNDia t Wheat, 466 /ICS 74s per v. Grey Peale 4os aasod Fine DWI:, 78s fics od Beans, (old) 411 475 od Rye, 38s 4.3. od Tick Ditto (old) 34$ 4o: od • Barley, 3os s6sod Osts,sts 241 3os Malt, 62161. Poland ditto 31$ 33. cd White Peale, (Boilers) 74: ills Rape Seed, 271 321 Floe Flour 5516 as —Second: sos to 551. &STUSIS PAIR or GRAIN ON 'WARD Stile Al 08081: Wheat 4 8 $ 56s 6os Boilers 701 825 od Fine 65s 7os Suffolk s to 82s od Superfine 731 776 Grey Peas 363 ass od Fine Utz White, Ste. —s Sos Beans, New 361 424 Rye, 344 421 Ditto Old —1 461 Barley 2Es 36s od Tick ileans, 3os 401 od Malt 36s 66s Oats 205 255 301 White Peas 461 6os Polands oos ass cd Rape Seed 281. to 321. per laft.—Fine Flour 5Ss to 6xs. per Sack FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE, MAY 23. • Avetage Price of Corn in England and W ales, from the Returns ending May 16, 1807. Wheal Rye. I Barley. I Oats. I Beans. I Peafe. 1. d. s. d.' s. d. s. d. a. d s. 4 . 75 6 47 8 33 4 27 8 42 7 49 7 The avenge Prieeof Sugar, computed from the Returns made in the week ending May so, is 335 SS• per hundred weight. PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW. St. James's. Whitechapel. Hay perload 3 3oto 5 5 o Hay per load 4 oto 5 12 Straw 2140t0 3 3 o I Straw al4to 3 6 Clover S sto 6 0 PRica OP OAT AND STRAW IN SmiTuriti.D. Hay, - 31 os to 51 os I Clover 41 os to Il 106 Rowen of Qs to of os I Straw, 21 its to 31 35 PRICE OF HOPS. • • 1.4011. rOCIIsTS. Kent 51 os to 61 Os Kent - 31 pto 61 me Suffez 51 os to 51 121 Sures . 51 01 •to 61 6. Effez 51 os to 51 tos Farnham 81 of to 91 95 PRIM OF HOPS IN THE BOROUGH MARKET. New Bags 31 p to 61 6s 1' Pockets 51 tics to 71 05 COAL MARKET, May at. Ships at Market Ships fold Price 21 Neweallle Coal 38 40s od to 3os od 2 Sunderland a 4 25 6 . 1 to 44 1 od COUNTRY MARKETS. . ralCts Or GRAIN AT TuR roLLowiNG MARNItTs. lizsicry•—Wheat 6os od to 83i od per Q. Barley 3os od to 355 od I Beans 365 od to 488 od Oats 245 od to 325 od Peak 46s od to szs cd Mainanneart.—Wheat 7os od to 8811 Oa per %Z. Barley 343 od to 36. ad I Beans 485 od to sos od Oats 3os od to 36. od Peale cos od to dos NI Navraum—Wheat 6os od to 885 od per Q E - Bsrley Sts od to 365 cal I Beans 428 od to 488 od Oats 3os od to 38s od Peale oos od to oos od Reantrao.--Wheat 75h od to 875 cd per Barley a6s od to 355 od I Mans 455 od to 485 od Oats 26s 6d to 335 ad Peale ass od to los od Basmcssoka..—Wheat 643 od to 845 od per Quarter. Barley 345 od to 36s od I Beans 435 od to 485 od Oats s6s 64 to 355 od Bread as 8d per gall= A perfon, aged 63, had a (mall Scrophulous Ul ceration in her hand, giving her much pain ; it then broke ant in her writt, both her (boulders, and her knee, each Ulceration difcharging much, and not dif pored to heal; it then affected her right elbow ; and thefe ulcerations, with a difpofitinn to general debi lity, the fuffer ed for twelve years. Her knee washealed in the Worcener Infirmary, and the experienced Come benefit while a patient for a (bort time in St. Bartholo mew's Hofpital, where the made application for the benefit of SPILSRURY'S PRTINT ANTISCORRUTIC DROPS, at the Difpenfatory, No: 15, Soholquare, London. By the application of the Drops for fix months, her ulcers gradually healed, the regained her firength and appetite. It is now a twelvemonth, and the remains perfedtly well. Any information of the above fait may be obtained at No. 9, Duke's , Court, Drury Lane, London. ECCLESIASTICAL AND ACADEMICAL PROMOTIONS. The Rev. C. E. Stewart, A. M. late Fellow of Magdalen Col lege, Oxford, has been prefented by the Lord Chancellor to the valuable Redtory of Bede, in Sulks. The Rev. John Dalby has been Inftitated to the Vicarage of Cattle Donington, on the prerentation of Lord Moira. UNIVIRSITY OF OIFOrD —Oa Thurfday the 14th inftant, the lift day of Eafter Term, the Rev. Jonathan Parker, B. 13 late F-S -low of Univerfity Collette, and now Archdeacon of Barnftaple and Canon of Exeter; and the Rev. Wm. Carey, B. D. late Student of ChM! Church, and Dew Head Matter of Weltminfter School, were admitted Dwitors in Divinity, Grand Compounders. The Rev. Jana Webber, of Chrift Church ; Rev. Wm. Don. caller ' Rev. Thomas Lownday and-Rev. John John!" of Mag dalen College, Mafters of Arty, were admitted Bachelors in Litt • city. Mr. Philip Serie,of Trinity College ; and the Rev. James Enos, of jefus College, B A. were admitted Matters of Arts. Mars. James William Viven, al All Souls College ; Thomas Palter, of, teen's College ; William Henry Campion, of Brafen Note College ; and Richard Goddard, of St. John's College, were admitted Bachelors of Arts. ii;lune dat the Rev . Winlam Halm, Donor io Dlvirdty, and late Fellow of - ninfty College, Dublin, was adadtted to the fame Degree in this Univerfity, fe Sat‘prday fennight, at Hill-Lodge, near Sandia notno, the 1,-.4 of CaOtain Walker, of hie Majelty'a Tha ia, .f 3 P•gh•er --- Oh Monday morning, George, an infant fon of Mr. Georga Tennant, of Great Ormond area. On' the 27th ult at Paris, in the 86th year of her age the Right H a n 1,24 Anafta6a Stafford Howard, Baronas of Stafford, oily fury i • t i g daughter and heir of William Earl of Stafford who dial in 1784. Her bed is Sir William Jeningham, Bart. 'Mae gra..d. mot her was Mee of the above William Earl of Stafford. A few days Mice, at juicy, Cliptaiu Lt dna, at the Royal Navy. - ,titt Elt Morning • Afterpooo • MO u 4$ allows our 6 . 10 Mimes ake. - - HOLT'S INFALLIbL?. HCiOPiNGVOLIGH SPECIFIC. AFTER an experience of upwards of 13 Vial' of the fuccels of this valuable Medicine in fcveral thouiat.d cafes of HOOPING COUGH, the Proprietor offers it tothe panne as the only Specific and infallible cure for this ditlrs ffing Mak When it is conlidtreil bow many Children die annually of this Malady, and that even when ienivered from it, too fit.t.ll lays the foundations of Confumptions of the Lungs and oche, fatal Difur. den, it cannot be too ftnmgly recommended to the aitentinn of Parents and other Guardians of Children, in order to prevent tilt: Difeafe when it makes its attack, from proceeding to a dangami height. So rpm!) , arc its cffedts, that it removes the Difeafe cam: pletely in fix or at molt tight dam; it poffeffes neither talte (melt, whick renders it eafily taken in the earlielt period of lufincy. The Proprietor challenges a Logic in ft MCC of failure to be bruughi forward where this Medicine has ban ufed. Sold wholefale and retail by R. Ilutler, No. 4, Cheardide, Loa. don;and retail by mad country venders, in bottles, price 4S each FOR ERUPTIONS ON THE SKIN. PETITS PATES, OR PURIFYING SWEET CAKES. IKONI the prevalence of Difeafes of the Ski n i n A- Children from Inoculation, and other caufes, and the duff'. culty of eradicating thew.,it has been long whited that an alterative could be deviled that Mould comprifa real benefit Li a fmall con!. pals, and at once be innocent, cheap, pleafant, and etreCtual. A. pradtitioner of great experience contrived, many years fince, a Medicine of t!is defcription fur his young patients, and pave it a form peculiarly adapted t. the Palate and Stomach of Children. The fuccefs of it fully anion red his expectation in all Eruptions wort the Skin, whether midi% from original Impurity of the Blood, or acquired by the Vaccine or Variolous Inoculation Na- rural Small Pox. IV:eailes, or any other caufe ; and it is now .wlth . confidence recommended to the attention or the Sold by F. licwbery and Sons, at the only warchoufe kr Dr. James's Powder, No. 45, St. Pa ul's Church yard, four doors from Llicayfide, I.ondon,price as. a Boz, containing ao cain.s or dohs, and 3d. the duty—Obferve that the words "F. Navbery, No. 45 St. Paul's," ale engraved in the damp PUBLIC ADVAN FACE. - ‘rr '1 'HE advantage the public mull always derive 1 from regularly edocated profeflional men diredting almolt ex clufivety their (Indies to one tpecies of malady, was never more clearly demonftrated than by the unexampled fuccefe which has attended the adminiltration of their new remedy, and the extra- • ordinary cures it ha; paforined. Cora lung feriesof years, Melfre CURKIE and Cu. Surgeons, formerly in his Majelty's fervice., have made the Venereal Difeafe the particular °hied of theft in veftigation, and are happy in having difcovercd a medicine lopes rior to me-cury in the cure of that complaint—it is fuffidient to obferve that the effedis of this remedy are eVametricalty oppofite to thofe of mercury,for though it conerletely eradicates every vettige of the virus, in its molt confirmed Rages, yet it dues nut in tue lead injure the conititution—on the contrary, it renovates the Cyr tem in all its natural fundtious, promotes appetite, and facilitates digcttion—thus itiltead of reduciag a Rreng and vigorous coaltitu tion etl the frightful condition that mercury does, it not..only pre !levee that conftitution in its primitive Rate, but reftures a weak and debilitated one wits natural ftringtis and vigour. Nuraherlefs inftances are on recent record of the fuperior efficacy of this Medicine, its inherent and fpecifie virtues acting as a per petual corredtive to bodily debility, 'eel:tether procetdiag front an excels of conjugal or illicit pleafure ' or from the more infiduous, though not lefs deftrudtive. im.ulgence of incau tious youth of both Rees in a certain pernicious habit Anna the melancholy variety of diforders which are the confecluences of this folitary vice, there arc none more affliEting than that dißreffing Rate ofilebility and deficiency, which prevents or tmbitters thetna trimonlal Rate; the unhappy fufferer broods over his misfortune, Rammed to Peek relief, until he is reduded to fuch a Rate of weak lier, as to render life oppreffive. To fuoh perfons it molt be a con foling reflection, to know that they may now, by a new infallible mode of treatm.nt, ife reftored to that greatell of all human blelf. Ings,a ftrong,manly. ind vigorous conftiuition. In all cafes of debility, deficiency. from whatever caufe arifing, as well as in every fpecies el venereal infedlion, Nickell. Currie And Co. may be confulted by patients of oithke fex, with the greateft fecrecy and honour, at their bottle, No. 507, Hatton Garden. • Letters from the Country (pod paid) including a bank note. will have the neceffary medicine and advice fent to any part °idle Kingdom. No. 107, Hatton Garden. `,/HEN ProfcilionAl Men of Education and Re. fponfibility deviate from the general Syftcm by the feledian of a particular branch, the fanttion of long continued fucceffes is the belt criterion of fuperiority. Thirteen years have I devoted my praetice to the exclufive .reJt ment of Three Dlforders, and the fuccefsful refute. of my plan g ives Me additional ardour to oppofe, as far as 1 am able, the ravages of thofc Complaints which are the mod important in the Cata.ogue of Human infirmities. After initiation into every Branch, as an Army Surgeon, I formed a with at an early period of pradtice to refeue individuals from the ignorance of uneducated men, or the equally dangerous precipitancy of getieral Pracctitioners. the Three Diforders, to the cure of which I have devoted my attention, comprife every fpecies of VENEREAL INFECTION, whether of a recent or long duration; xdly, all kinds of debility; whether arifing from the habits of fehool boys, or the indulgences of mature age ; and,laftly. that derangement of the fyftem in wo men which is called BARRENNESS, or STERILITY. Numerous Difeafes are the refult of ignorance,.or hafte in the treatment of atmple Gonorrhea ; and it not unfrequently hap pens that the feeds of life are poifoned by the indifer, that) of an. unguarded hour By a fuperior methtti fuch Complaints re rafily cured; and, even where others have failed, I truft that I may fume to offer a radical re-eftablifhment. Few, however, are the cafes of complicated dined: in this dir order, compared with the calamitous litudlcms of men, whol„rotu an indulgence in a folitary vice, or the prevalent .gaieties of 'a fathionahle life, acquire that Rate of debility. which, is the una voidable confequence of. fuch pernicious habits. Where the unhappy (offerer broods over Ws mifery, but care. fully conceals his misfortune, it may be Tome confnlatioit for bite to knovi, that although it be an objcdt of doubt or uncertainty with other praCtitioners, the removal of there deficiencies by the gradual progrefs of renovation, is the acquirement of nay experi ence. If the rites of Bacchus or Venus have begun to reduce manly vigour, much anxiety will be prevented by an early couoteradtloa of this languid Rate; and in there cafes no great difficulty will ocent. But where this deficiency has for years ex ifl4-ti, a proper pee: , verattee is indifpenfably requifite to revive the ihanattering (park , - of life, and to re-animate the conftitution. MARRIED WOMEN, who have long been difappennted their expeelations of a family, may be atri.te•l, that to mutt in. ftances,fuch defcds are curable by Medical :kill. The fecrecy which fa f s efftntiall to pay end. 1-1. It ing, and the qualificatiot.s which I have prefumed to state, form the labs of my pretenfions, and in coincidence with inch this iutimation given, that Mr. Bree may be confulted ptrfonally, or by Late* (inclafing a (mall Note), at his boat, No. 29, Arlirldel•ftlECE , Strand, near Temple-Ear. J There is an additional Entrance in Water Otreet adjoining, and the name is on both the doors. MARTIN bREE, Member of the Royal College of Surecons in London- A CAUTION....BOIIIe Perfons, who talfely oiTat themfaret to be Mesaatas or rue ROYAL CO L Ltor., havins far teveral months paR copied my Advertifements almoft word for word, and inferred them as their own produCtions, it is my duty to mention that thole Perkins are ma Members of any College in London. Ea" burgh, or elfewhere; nor base they stay right to practice in London. N. B. A Lift of the !Wernher' is publiChed ax the Houle of dig College in Lincoln's-lon Fi aids, which may be seferred to. LONDON: Printed and publiihed by LEVEL KENT. (o« '' a ' terbury-Place, Lambeth), at the STA a-Or ric No 001' Suet. Pubileted alto at be STAII Germs, Teniptelbse