Star. — London, England, 1809-11-28 00:00:00

•• to be co - am: imitated to Lord Castlereagh by your ' I,irhip ; Ttiat, on the 27th of June, no step appearing to e been taken, either to execute the intended ar ;gement, or to apprise Lord Castlereagh of it, I nottstrated against the delay, and againa the con- ilmeat flirt Lord Castlereagh ; and that, on the th, I again tendered my resignation ; and that on , • • same day your Lord,hip seceived an injunction .;orimtunicate the intended arrangement to Lord astlereagh. That, on the sth of July, a new plan was stated me to be in contemplation ; a planoriginating with .ar Lordarip, and depending for its execution upon step to be taken by yourself ; that this plan Was, on to I.lth. ermoun•:..ed to MC as settled, and as intended, be vabeOrtted for that which had been first pro. That I at that time renewed my remonstrances in the strongest manner, both against the delay and against the concealment ; but that it was stated to me tea he an iudis.pensible condition of this plan on your Lordship's pa-t, that it was not to be acted upon till the rerrainatimo of the expedition to the Scheldt, aiid that the time of making the communication to Lod C.,•tlereagh should be left to your Lordship's discretion ; That at Icrigth, in cnmpliance with the representa tions and entreaties of the Duke of Portland, and of ethers, Lord Castlereagh's friends, and upon the most Adenan assurances that Lord Castlereagh should in tho mean time he prepared by his Mends for the change, and that the change should positively take place at the period fixed by your Lordship, I con sented to remain in office. • That on Wednesday, the . fith of September, find ing that nothing had been done towards preparing Lord Castlereagh for the arrangement, and that the I execution of it would be attended with difficulties of which I had not before been apprised, I desired the Duke of Portland to lay my resignation before the King. Your Lordship will therefore perceive, That up to the Sth of June so far from being in pos session cf any " promise for Lord Castlereagh's re moval," and from his continuance in office being made thereby " dependant upon my pleasure ;" no decision whatever had, to my knowledge, been taken, up to that time ; no proposal had been made to me by . the Duke of Portland, in any way affecting Lord Castlereagh's political situation ; and no intimation had be tr given to me, whetlin my own resignation would be finally accepted or declined ; That the arrangt'.rnent which was in contemplation front the Sth June to the sth July, in no degree affec ted, and was rifwei intended to affect, ." the conduct' of the especliion to the Scheldt ;" That Lord Castlereagh's ‘. removal from the War Department was first determined upon as part of the plan of which your Lordship's resignation was the basis ; " That hs " removal from the Administration" was not at any time demanded by me, And, lastly, that I did employ the tender of my own resignation, not to enforce decision only (as Lord Castlereagh's letter supposes), but equally to enforce disclosure ; and that in fact I did ultimately resign, rather than enforce the intended change, under cir cumstances so different front those which I had been authorized to expect. It cannot be expected that I should labour very anxionily to relate the charge of my having sup pose d' your Lordship and others ' to be Lord Caslereagles friends ;' and having under that im prcs.sion deferred to your opinion and authority, in a matter affecting Lord Castlereagh's interests and feelings. That your Lordship in particular, as well from near connexion as from an active and anxious partiality, was entitled to consultation and to deference on such an occasion, is a persuasion which I felt in common, as I believe, with every Member of the Government ; and which not even Lord Castlereagh's disclaimer has induced me to renounce. I should not have been surprised, nor should I have thought myself entitled to take the smallest offence, it your Lordship had„ instead of concurring in the ex pediency of a change in Lord Castlereagh's depart snent,protested against it, and had recommended to the Duke of Portland to advise the King to accept my resignation : and it was perfectly known by the Duke of Poriland, and I am confident not unknown by your Lordship, • that at any moment from the beginning of these discussions to the end, I was not only ready, but desirous toterminate them by re ih ai u w hen the opinion of the expediency of a change in the War department had been adopted by so many of the immediate friends of Lcrd Castlereagh, upon the condition that it should be reconciled to Lord Castlereagh's feelings ; and when they, and your .Lordship among the first, had devised and concerted with the King's First Minister the moJle of carrying that object into execution, I cannot help thinkingthat I should have been much and justly blamed if I had insisted upon taking the communication to Lord Cm-, tlereagh out of your hands into my own. 1 now come to your Lordship's statement. That statement is as follows: " As it may he inferred, from a statement which has appeared o il the public Papers, that Lord Camden withheld from Lord Castlereagh a communication which he had been desired to make to Lim, it ispecescary that it should be understood, that however Mr. Canning might have conceived the communication alluded to to have been made to Lord Camden, it was never stated to Lord 6.:znten, that the communication was made at the desire of Mr. Canning; and, so far from Lord Camden having been autho rized to make the communication to Lord Castlereagh, he was, absolutely restricted from so doing. " As it slay also be inferred that I.ord Camden was expected to prepare Lord Castlereagh's mind for any proposed change, it is necessary that it should be understood, that Lord Camden sever engaged to communicate to Lord Castlereagh any eircom *tante% re.Tecting it, before the termination of the Expedition."-- STAY , OC C. 10. This statement appears to me to have been much :misunderstood. It has been construed as if your I_,ordship had meant to aver, that what you were restricted from doily , and what you h a d not engag b, c,' to do, were one and the same thing; whereas your statement, in point of fact, contains two • • 1 ositions, and refers to two separate pa to your 'Lordship, to the time at which the proposed arrangement for thenewdistribution oldie business of the War Department was superseded by your Lord ship's tender of your resignation. The period during which your Lordship states yourself not to have engaged' to make a communi cation to Lord Castlereagh, extends from the time of the tender of your Lordship's resignation to the ter mination of the Expedition to the Scheldt. It ought, however, to be observed, that during the first of these two periods—from the 28th of April to the 12th of July,—the nature of the communication to be made to Lord Castlereagh, and the nature of the restriction imposed upon your Lordship, were en tirely changed. Previously to the Bth of June—the communication which your Lordship would have had to make to Lord Castlereagh, was simply that I had represented the expediency of a change either in his department or in mine ; and that no decision whatever had yet been taken upon this representation. With respect to this communication, it does appear that the restriction upon your Lordship was absolute and indefinite.—But I knew nothing of its existence. Sukeriently to the Bth of June, the communication to be made to Lord Castlereagh was, that an an ange meat was in contemplation for a new distribution of the business of the War Department. With respect to this communication, not only was the restriction upon your Lordship not indefinitely.con tinued ; but your Lordship actually received on the 28th of June an injunction to male this communication to Lord Castlereagh at a period distinctly specified, viz.—the sailing of the Expedition. And this in junction was only superseded by . voluntary act of your Lordship's—your tender of your own resigna tion on the 12th of July, as the basis of another ar rangement. During the whole of the period, from the 28th of April to the 12th of July, the concealment practised towards Lord Castlereagh was tither without my knowledge and contrary7to my belief, or it was against my ex .nest remonstrances. It was without my knowledge and contrary to my belief, up to the week in which Parliament rose ; and from that time forth it was against my earnest remon stances. Even when I learnt, in June, that the communica tion had not been made by your Lordship to Lord Castlereagh, I did not learn that you had been pre vented from making it by any absolute restriction. It was not till the month of Ally, in the ccurse of the discussions which toot place from the 13th to the 20th of that month, respecting the proposal for post poning the new arrangement to be founded on your Lordship's resignation, and for leaving to your Lord ship's discretion the time of disclosure to Lord Cas tlereagh, that I learnt that the silence which you had . hitherto observed towards him, had been imposed upon your Lordship by the injunction of the Duke of Pritl:md. I did not ti;l then know with whom the concealment hitherto practised had originated ; I frankly own that I thought it had originated with your Lordship ; I was anxious above all things that it should not be ever suspected that it had originated with me ; or that I had been a consenting party to it, or even (till a late period) conscious of its exist ence. In my correspondence with the Duke of Portland at this period, therefore, at the same time that I re sisted the new delay then proposed, I disclaimed any concurrence in the concealment which had been hi therto practised—and requested " that it might be remembered hereafter, whenever that concealment should be alleged against me, as an act of injustice to Lord Castlereagh, that it did not originate in my sug gestions, that so faiO from desiring it, I had conceived (however erroneously) . your Lordship to be the sure channel of communication to Lord Castlereagh ; and that up to a very late period I had believed such com munication to have been actually made." The Duke of Portland, in answer, acknowledged my repeated remonstrances against the concealment; stating himself at the same time not to have been aware that I had at any time believed the communi cation to have been actually made.; but assuring me " that he should be' at all times ready to avow that the concealment had originated with himself, (the Duke of Portland) ; that he had injoined it to all those with whom he had communicated—from motives which he was at all times ready . to justify ; aad that he was desirous of taking whatever blame might have been, or might at any time be, incurred by it, upon , himself." This, as I have said, was my first knowledge of any restriction whatever upon your Lordship's com munication to Lord Castlereagh. If J am asked why I believed your Lordship to have actually made the communication, I answer, be cause it was natural that yOu should make it ; because the expectation of your making it was the motive which induced me to desire (and. 4 did desire) that the communication should be made to your Lord ship ;—because the manner in which you first re ceived that communication (as reported to me by the. Duke of Portland) tended to confirm the belief that your Lordship was the fit channel of communication to Lord Castlereagh ;—and because I knew not of the existence of any impediment to your pursuing what appeared to me (and does still appear to me) the natural and obvious course to be pursued upon such an occasi•on. If it be objected, that I ought not to have been contented with presuming the disclosure to have been made, but ought to have diligently ascertained that it was so ;—first, 1 answer—that no person naturally sets about ascertaining that of which he entertains no doubt ;—and, secondly, I answer—that the moment that my suspicion of the fact was excited, I did set about ascertaining the truth ; and that upon ascer taining it, I did remonstrate in the strongest manner against the concealment ; and enforced that remon strance by the tender of my own resignation. It was on the '26th or '27th of June (five or six days after Parliament) that I discovered my suspicion to be founded. On the 27th I remonstrated. On the 28th I tendered my resignation. And in the course of the same day your Lordship (as I have already stated) received an injunction to make the communication as soon as the Expedition should have sailed. • during whicn your Lordship states I The second of the two periods to which { your Lord -- I abs( !iitely restricted ' from ' from ship's Statement refers, begins from the Ith of Jul; , , • the day of the tend er o f your Lo r d s hip's resignation. to Lord Castlerea, ex- It does not appear, nor does your Lordship's state - i rii, ~ Ti 171lic!: yt -e first ment aver, that at any time kli7ing this second period . . 1 - !,/ . • ,nd the restriction which b. , • imposed upon -. • your Le p was renewed ; or that any other exist ed exceps.4hat which your Lordship had imposed,p on ycruisdf, and which was - dierefore no loner bind ing upon yoar Lordship than while yon might your self be willing that it should bind you. Of the eitent to which this sq . -imposed restriction appears to have gone, I had not any suspicion. I knew indeed that your Lordship had stipulated to keep the time of the disclosure to Lord Castleieagh in your own hands : but subsequently to my being made acquainted with that stipulation, I had received the assurances, which I have already described, on behalf of " Lord Cistlereagh's friends"; and had re lied upon those assurances. It was not till the 6th of September that I learnt that those assurances had-not been carried into effect. It was not tillsthe 19th of September that I learnt that your Lordship had been no party to them. Then indeed I learnt that your Lordship had not only " not engaged" to make the communication previously to the a issue of the Expedition being known here" —but that in July you had " stated to one of our Col leagues," (not the Duke of Portland)— 64 who was urging an earlier communication," that the 44 time of " communication, so far as you were concerned, was " for you to decide ; but that no one had a right to " say you did not perform that part in the transaction in which you were concerned, if you did not open your " filis to Lord Castlereagh before the issue of the Extedi. " lion was known here." This information I received from your Lordship, in a letter dated the 19th of September. It was then perfectly new to me. I leave your Lordship to judge what must have been my surprise, when, atter receiving from your Lordship, on the evening of the 19th of September, this frank avowal of the real origin of the conceal. ment maintained during this latter and most im portant period, towards Lord Castlereagh,' I received on the following morning Lord Castlereagh's letter of the same date, making me responsible lcir that con cealment. I have not to trouble your Lordship with any farther observations. I have confined myself to matters growing out of Lord Castlereagh's letter, and out of your Lordship's Statement : on those alone have 1 any right to claim your Lordship's attention. To this Address to your Lordship I have been compelled to resort, however reluctantly, to vindicate my rivate honcur. As to any charges against my public conduct—this is not the mode to reply to them. If any such shall be brought against me, at the pro.. per time and in the proper place I shall be prepared to n:zet and to repel them. - I have the honour to be, with great respect, My Lord, Your Lordship's most obedient humble Servant, GEORGF. CANNING. LONDON MARKETS. RETURN of WHEAT in Mark-lane, including only from the 13th of November to the INth of Nov. Total 6,390 quarters. Average 104 s. ote.-2s. ill higher than last return. A RETURN OF FLOUR, From the 11th of November to the 17th of Novembor. Total 20,413 sacks-Average 949. Gld. Cs. Id. lower thanh.t return. FROM TIIF. LONDON GAZETTE., November 21. Average Price of Corn In F.ne/and and Wales, front the returns ending the 17th of November, 1809. Wheat. Rye. Barley. Oats. Beans. Pease. d. I s. d. I s. d . d. 101 9 1 597 1 50 7 31 11 159 8 • 1 58 2 The average Price of Sugar, computed front the returns made the week ending the 224 day of November, is 495. 7-10. per cwt. INSPECTOR'S RETURN AT UXBRIDGE, Nov. 23. Wheat per kid 241. Os. to 301. los. Barley, per quarter 365. -d. to 48.. -4. Oats 283. -el. to 425. -d. Beans 50s. -d. to 655. -d. Peas 555. -el. to .531. -4 PRICE OF HOPS IP THE BOROUGH MARKET. " SAGS. POCKETS. Keit .51. 10s. to 61. 6s. Kent 51 Os. to 71. Os. Sussex 41. as. to 51. os. Sussex 41. 10s. to 51. leg. PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW. Sr.ST.lAatsss. Wuttccnari t.. Hay 41. Os. to el. 15s. Hay 51. 03. to 61. es Straw IL 1111. to 21. 5. Clover 61. 125. to 71..10 s Straw 11. 141. to 21..10, PRICE OF HAY AND STRAW IN SMITHFIELD. • Meadow Hay 51. Os. to 61. Os. Clover 61. Os to 71. leis New ditto 41. 10s. to 51. 10s. New do. 01. Os to 01. Os Straw - IL 14s. to 21. 10s. SMITHFIELD MARKET, November 27. ' To sink the Offal per stone of 81b. Beet 4s. Bd. to ss. od. Veal ss. 01 to .73. Gd Mutton 3s. 4d. to ss. 6d. Pork 6s. (hi. to 7s. Od ULAD or CATTtE THIS OAT. Boasts, about 3475-Sheep and Lambs, 13,700. Calves, 220--Pigs, 340. • NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKET. Per stone of 81b.by the carcase. Beef 3s. Od. to 4s. 6d. Veal 4s. ad. to 63. Od Mutton 3s. 44. to ss. 6d. Pork ss• 81. to 6s. 81 Lamb Skins, Os. (hl. to Os. Od.-Sheop Skins, 2s. Gd. to ss. Od. PRICE OF LEATHER IN LEADENHALL MARKF.T. Butts 224. 23d. Calf Skins 346. 406 Ditto 241 25d. Ditto 345. 39s Merchants' Backs 215 d. 22d. Ditto 9.65. 326 Dressing Hides 181 1944. Sn .11 Seals 31. Od. Ss. 2.1 Fine Coach Hides 191 d. 21d. Large ditto 100 s. 130.. Crop Hides for cwt. 174. 19;d. Tanned Horse Hides 21d Ditto 191 d. 22.14. Goat Skins OOs. 001 PRICE 01: TALLOW: St. Jalnees Market 56 '2ll '1 own Tallow so. 0.3 Clare Market 5s tf.d 1 chow Rii*!.ia 926 Od WhitechaPel Market 5. 2d White ditto 88% 04 • per stond of 81b. 15s 641 Melting Stuff 70. ous Od Average 5. 21 Ditto rough -s 50. Graves 14. Od Good Dreg, 141 Od Yellow S.ap, ans.-Mottled, 114 s Od-Curd, 1181. 04. Price of Candles, per dozen 15. Od--Moulds, 16s 01. COAL IVIARKET, November 27. , hips at Market Ships sold Price 1295 Newcastle Coals 94 465. od. to 701.01. 18 Sunderland 15 645. Od. to 6es. :;il. • 4 Cinders • 0 oos. 04. . COUNTRY MARKETS. PRICES or GRAIN AT TUE ruI.LUWINO mimic FTS. BAstsiosTov.s.-Wheat 86s0d to 12..4 04 per teziarter. Barley 44s Gel to 50s (hl Bears to Oats 31. Od to 39. hd I Pease (los od to ous Bread 2s 4. 1 ,4. per gallon. liestrv.-Wheat 965 Cd to 123: ed•per Qr. Barley 361 od to 545 Gil Beans 526 od to 68s Od Oats 26* 04 to 42. (Al Pease 60s Cd to u-is td Bread 2.. Gd. per gallon Maiinenntan.-Wheat 1005 (Id to 122 s Od per Qr. Barley 43. 04 to 52s Od Beans 60s CiA to 636 Od Oats 33. Od to 43s Od Pease - KOs ad to W. 01 Bread 2.5. (3d. per gallou. Nzwsuier.-Wheat 95s Od to 130 s Cd per Qr. Barley 366 Od to 506 Od I Pease 60s ad to 63s Od Oats 26. 04 to 89s od Leans 505 Od to 76s Od Bread ..... '2s , :4 per gallon. . n.-Wheat 122 s Od to I%us Od per Quarter. New Wheat 76. to 1;;Os. • . 311 s Od to 531 Od I Beans .50s Cd to 676 Od 27. Qd to Sus Od Pease 53* Od to als Gd Bread 2s. sel: per g'allon. Barley Oass • ECCLESIAMIICAL araritrynte le , Thgrour, the Rev. Mr. Aki. Brunton was admitted one of t h e ministers of the. Trow Church, Edinburgh, in room of the late Or. Andrew Hurter. The Rev. lames Reed, Fellow of Exeter Collef , ,r., Oxfor I, on e of his Majesty's Chaplains in ordinary, and late;y Precepto r to the Marquis of Downshire, ist presented by the Ma:cilioness of `Downshire to the Rectory of Eversholt, near Woburn, Bedford shire. CAlgintinor —The election of a successor to the Re v. Crew Borlaise, deceased, in the office uF Iteg:strar of this Univertity, came on last Thursday. Iv candidates were, the Rey. M r. Lim Pemberton, Fellow of o:tuna' College, and the Rev. Mr. Ker , rich, Fellow of Magdalen ; the former Gentleman was elf ctesl by a majority of 177 votes. PARTNERSHIPS DISS3LVED. Garth and Co. or Garth and Thoniber, cotton•spinn ers , and calico-manufacturers, of Urine, Lancaihire, A ugust 7; 1809.—George Hazard and John Carthew, of Beech •street, Bar bican, London, printers, Jane sr 4, 1 809.— WM. WO and Wm, Crass, of Bishop Wearmoutb, Durban', mercers and drap tts . Nov. 18, 1809.—Hartley, Briggs, and Co. of Ulverston, Lan cia ; shire, August 4, I 809.—Ann King and Co. Woodbridge, Suffol k wine and brandy-merchants, October 1809.—W m , p arson ' and Wm Robertson, of Manchester, bookselers and rtat i oners. Nov. 31. 1809.—Lees, Son, Malbourne, and Baulk)* of filar cheater, fustian-manufacturers, as to Joseph Malbourned.-ceat t 4 Sept. 3, 1809.—Sam. Southall, Sam. Fossick, and Jim'. Nuttir. of Gracechurch-street, London, un+rella.makers, Oc•oli,r n.. 1809.—Fred. Lewis Pollman and John Keyloch, late of Cave: court, Threadneedle -street, London, Nov. 24, 1809,—Beni;, Bailey, of Carshalton, and Wm. Bennett, of 141itcharu-Con calico-printers, at Mitchasn, Sept. 29, 1809.— Cornelius ` .l and Co. of Lardiarset, lAverpoel. linen-Jraper., Sept. 4, BIRTHS. On the 1 9 .7 th instant, the Lady of flcr-2c: Okr.irdm i r, T o Cannon-street, of a Son. On Saturday the 43th instant, the Lady of Lieutinar.; •Cub ): , Douglasn, of the Stith Reriment, of a Son. rAkKIED. Yesterday, at St. George's, Sotithse;trk, by the Rev. J. R. 1 derma, M. A. Chaplain told; Ruyal Highness the Nil:- of Ktr.t Samuel Shepherd, Esq. of Faversham, in the county c,f Ke nt , to ' Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Richard Knight, Esq. of :he Kew Kent Road. CHALLENGE. MESSRS. CUR RI E and Co. Surgeons, Lue in Lis Majesty's Service, challenge the whole world to prov e a single instance where their Medicine and method of sure have failed of the desired etlect. The practice of many year in this particular branch of their profession_ has not given rise to one unsuccessful case. They continue to direct their studies to the treatment and cure of Venereal Complaints, and that derangement of the system, which is the consequence of the pernicious and wasteful effects et a habit long and most unhappily pursued by the youths of Itoth sexe s : in the one it will be found to be the unfailing source of barren ness ; the other have itssravages fatally ilee , .thiped to theta by a dis tressing state of debility, which, if not th , iely remedied, t ern :111.:7t s in impotence. 'These are its remote and nit imate effects, while con sumptions,loss of muscnlar power, and various nervous complain , s usually characterise the earlier stages of this solitary vier. Of per sons languishing under the disorders incident to 6nch a habit, dui f treatment is simple and bas never proved tmsneetrastal, in ths course of a long, laborious, acid much extended practice. In the Most obstinate and complicated cases of venereal infection, Alegi as obstructions in the urethra, excrescences, hard tee mours, callous ulcers, eruptions, seminal we..in!css, glees, as also STRICTURES, Whether recent or of long duration, and which h-2.ve baffled the skill of other Practitioners ; are by their present improvol rlm treatment, effectually and permanently cured, without the pant! t suffering the excruciating pain and alarming hemorthage often follows the application of the lunar caustic. I t the c00t,.. f 20 years extensive practice in this metropolis, nuntemus ease., .1 Strictures have been and are daily under their are, the • eradication of which are effeeted by a safe, certal aid z t - dints mode of practice, superior to any outer yet ai..,iited weakness, relaxation, and debility proceeding :rem slits e is speedily removed, and the patent restored to sot.: goreus health. But where the debility has for ye are proper perseverance in their restorative remedies, :tit e r Lure has been destroyed, is indispensably I-egoist% to t. slumbering sparks of life, and to reanimate ch.. C-nst.. e. Several Noblemen and Gentleinen, of. the firsi have been under the care of Messrs; Currie and Co.- tot the re moval of complainti of the Urethra, Strictures, Ste. std, having received a radical and permasteot cure , requee4 that refetea res may be made to them as twist - act' ry eviSenctg of :he decided su periority of Messrs. Currie and Co.'s Flan of !reatment. Mat , y of these Gentlemen have had Strictures from ten to twenty years, and had been under the care of Messrs. Hbier and Heav , shies, and other surgeons of equal eminence, who attempted the cure by the application of the lunar caustic , without success. Messrs. Currie and Co. may be consulted by either sex with the greatest delicacy, secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. 107, Hatton-Garden. Patients in the country are requested to suite the particulars of theircase, age, and general kabit of living, :'•tc. inclosing a remittance for advice and medicines, when the state will be given or sent to any part of the kingdom. To ensure that secrecy so essential to their undertaking, the postage of Letters may be added to the account for medicines. 9th June,lBo9-107, Hatton Garslen. , IC . the WHEN PROFESSIONAL MEN of Ectucattoa and Responsibility deviate from the General System by the selection of a particular branch, the sanction of low continued success is the best criterion of superiority. Fourteen years have we devoted our practice to the erchnire treatment of two disorders, and the successful resth of our I Ile gives us additional ardour to oppose, as far as we are air, the ra vages of those complaints which are the most important if the catalogue of human infirmities. After initiation into every branch of practice, we contempl,:ted the sufferings of Siphylitic and debilitated Patients, and forriini a wish Ce4ale individuals from the ignorance of uneducated r.•„..r, or the equally dangerous precipitancy of general practitimiers. The disordurs, to the cure of which we have devoted our alt,'''• tlon, comprise every species of Venereal Infection, whether of recent or long duration, :idly, Ali kinds of debility, wlict.,tt arising from the habits of school-boys , or the indulgencies or ma ture age.—Nunnerotis diseases are the result or ignorance, baste in the treatment eta simple Cionorrlicra, and it not utiiL quilitly;hapasetis, that theatedi of life are pui,onvil by the indi'- cretion of an tins:win - led hour. By a super:i . ir method such complaints are easily cured; rd even where others have failed, we trast t4at we may presume to offer a radical re-eqablishnient. Few, however, are the cases of complicated distress is Otis is order, compared with the calamitous situations of men, who, trout an indulgence in :t Solitary Vice, or the prevalent gaieties of a fashionable life, acTiire that state of d•liility, which is the un avoidable consequence of such pernicious habits. Where the unhappy sufferer twoo•ls over his misery, lint cre oily conceals his misfortune, it May be some consoletioa for l!iir to know, that altlioagh it be as object of doubt or tilcert3inty with other practitioners, the removal of these defiritincies the gradual progress of renovation is the acquirement of our experienc? It Cie rites of Bacchus or Venus have bogun to reduce manly vigour, nitich anxiety will he prevented by an early courterzction of this languid state,and in those cases, uo great difficultywill occur. But where this deficiency lies for yearsatxisted. a royer pets& verarre is indispensilily requisite totrevive the ;lumbering sparks of life, and to re-animate the constitution. The secrecy which is so essential to cur undertaking, and the qitalitications which we pre,aanie to state, forrn• the hails of out f.retensions, and in coincidence with such this 'mimetic:l isgieea that Messrs. Leto a and Co. may be consulted personally, or I , ' letter, (inclosing a Bank Note) at their house, No. '29, Arundel street, Strand, near 'l'emple Bar. There is an additirmal entrance In Water-street ailloining, l the name is on both doors. A Diploma from the Royal College of Surgeons in London, nnl Testimonials Irons the most eminent Physicians and Lecturers C. regular education, and assiduous attention to the studies of eve7f branch of the profession, are open tc t he inspection of ary enqu ire:, and constitute a fair ground for that success with which we hay' hitherto been-honoured. E LEIGH and4:o. Surgeons. • No. t.tta, Arundel-stree• HIGH NVATEIt AT LUNL/ON 'SLUDGE fU-NIOKROW. Morning . . Sti minutes atter 6 Afternoon ... 56 minutes after 6 LONDON : Pripted and published by LEVEL Kl..\ I ', of Cu terburpPlace, Lambeth, at the STAR-OFFIC:Z, No. t, Carole itrem Published also at the 3TattmOtrict,Trinple Bar. II