Star. — London, England, 1804-04-25 00:00:00

T HE INHABITANTS of Culeman-flreet Build- Inge and its Neighbourhood, return their fincerc Thanks to 11 the Gentlemen Volunteen railed In the Ward of Culeman-ftreet, and others, both Cavalry and Infantry. for thcir waive and prompt Affillance at the lac: FIRE in that place, by which means, and the very laudable exertions of the Firemen front all the Public Offices, an alarming kite which threatened &natation to a raft extat, was happily extinguiClia Signed at the (equator the Ne•lehbourhood, April 24, 1 go 4 ROBERT PARNE WELL. JOHN )ENNINGS. Alt ES MILLS. • OHN OLIVER. Mil 1 wh to ag: vro dif Ch dei fib cei ino • AI in orol Su too bl hii to of iii ar tb tb cc ce fa so tb co el tii fa Cl • b ci d a 9 t I f ii ■ a t: a • 1, f ; I 1 • • 1,1 PARLMMENTARr PROCEEDINGS. HOUSF. OF LORDS, TUEDAY, APRIL 14. The Marquis at s FA t FORD mcw.J, that hi. n. .icc of ntn tlnn , waning to the.Defence of the Country, which Rood for Friday, could be difebsrged, and that the fame mould be pollponed to Monday next, on which day he movcd the Lords Mould be rum , Ineneth—uraereo. Lord HAWKESBURY moved, that the lin Militia Transfer Bill he read a third time. The LORD CHANCELLOR Elated the opinions which Ise had given on a (miner occafion, with refpeft to fame particular objeetions that had been urged againit that part of the Bill, which it was contended would fubjea the frith Militia to the penalties and difqyalifications impofcd by the Ilatute of the 25th Charles IL He had given the fubjeft much confi deration fine it was Jail difeuffed, and the impref fion upon his mind was, that Roman Catholic Offi cers or foldiers of the Irifh Militia, who flionld come into this country under the operation of the prefent . • Aft, would come into it with all the privileges and immunities, attached to them, that they poffilfed in eonfequence of the Aft of the 33d of the King-- Such, upon mature deliberation, was his opinion, and inch he could affert to be the opinion of another No ble and Learned Lord, whom he did not now fce in his place. The Duke of NORFOLK sliced, whether Roman Catholics admitted into the Irith Militia in this coun try, would be exempt from the difabilities of the Aft of the 25th of Charles 11. ? The LORD CHANCELLOR gave it as his opi nion, that they would be exempt. Earl SPENCER did net feel himfelf competent to argue the queftion with all the profeffional ability of the Noble and Learned Lords, but it certainly, in the little judgment that he, a plain unjearned man, could form on the fubjeft, appeared extremely ne cerfary to him, as doubts had been entertained on the febjeft, that a pofitive declaration and precife matt- anesit &cold fat them to refl. The LORD CHANCELLOR Rated, that one of the greatelt inconveniences profeffional men, who were called upon to pronounce judicial deci fi ons, la boured under. arofe from the coufufion that was pro- duced by overloading Afts of Parliament with unne cetrary ciente". Of that defeription he conceived the claufe to be that it was propofed to introduce ; and therefore he would feel it his duty to oppore it. Lord ELLENBOROUGH corroborated the opi nion of the Noble and Learnea Lord on the Wool. Pack. as to the exemption of Roman Catholic offi cers or privates of the Militia, from the operation of the laft Aft. Lord GRENVILLE had every refpeft, and was difpofed to receive with all the deference that was due to them, the opinions of profeffional Mem bers of that Houfe, on profeffional queitions. But this was a fubjeft of rather a Legiflative than a Ju dicial charafter, and, therefore, he was excurable in differing from the Noble and Learned Lords who had favoured the Moore with their opinions on the If. indeed, the queffion had been decided in another place, by the Noble and Learned Lord who prefided in the Court of King's Bench, there his authority was recognized, and his opinion would be fubmitted to with that general approbation that his great learning and profeffional talents entitled him so expeft. But here, he fpoke it with all due refpeft, the Noble Lord could only be confidered as a Peer of Parliament, and his opinion was not entitled to more refpeft than that of any other Peer, except as it mould be fupported by fuperior argument. He did not agree with the Noble and Learned Lord, that the claufe was unneceffary. Doubts had been excited in the brealls of his Majeily's Catholic rubjeSs, offi cers of Militia, and, therefore, he deemed it extreme ly important. that they fhould be quieted. To effeft that he had taken the trouble of preparing a claufe which he would take the liberty of offering to the Houk, the purport of which was, That perfons pro feffing the Roman Catholic religion, and others, rety ing as officers, non-commiffioned officers, or privates . its the Militia of Ireland, Ihould not be rubjefled to any dirabilities or penalties in this country, that they were exempt from in Ireland. Lord CARLETON fupported, in a (born fpeech, the arguments of the two Noble and Learned Lords, and the opinions which they grounded on diem. Lord GRENVILLE proleffed himfelf not fatisfied with the extra judicial decifions that had been given on this point. and wifhed that the determination re. fpeaing it. &mild reft on mote folid and certain grounds, than opinions thrown out mutely and 11CC01- (tonally in the courfe of debate. He wifhed fir a fpecial provilion that would apply particularly to the quellion. The Biftiop of ST. ASAPII was inclined to pay the utmoll deference to the opinion of the Nnhic and Learned Lords ; but he thought it his duty, as the ; r egent who had firll moved the querlion, to fupport the claufe propored by the Noble Baron, the effeft of which, he had every reafon to rupprife, would completely fatt,fy the minds of the Roman Catho. lies renting in the Militia. Lord HAWKE3BURY and the Martinis of SLIGO oppefcd the ciaufe, which was topportrd by Lord MULGRAVE iu a very neat fixech, in reply to whom Lord ELLENBOROUCH rife again, and gave it as his decided opittont, that no Roman Catholic Of ficer who bad been admitted into the bah Mali:ia in that country, and who fhould come Fiery in conic. quence of the Bill belote the Houle, would be 10)- jefl to the opeta•ion of the a5lll at Chatle, .titd this good teal-n. that it s.uuli not he potrode frame fuck an atit• rotation ag.ttolt fuel% ttilizet that Ilatti•e. as could bring hire within the limit o r httcr of hat Aft, w hith re(por,..tl z months prey' left.. t nce, bctOte he could be fobs& to ptu •ifions of it. 1..111 ht.k.hICF.R replied. when the ll , ure bloa CA.tattlaor—rt.t.g • 5 s, YIOLICS Contents—Peers 38, Proxies 7-4 g. Majority againft the claufe 26. On the queftion that this Bill be now gaffed, it was oppofed at con fi derable length by Lorda.Mal grave and Carnarvon, and fupported by the Earl of Weamortland. Another divifion took place For paffing the Bill, Peers 69, Proxies 23-91. Againft it, Peers +l, Proxies 8-49. Majority for it 42. The third reading of the Ira Militia Augmenta tation Bill was then moved fir. Lord KING oppofed the Bill, as a meafure that would prove wholly inefficient for creating any great acceffion to the public force. His Lordthip con demned, in very animated language, the policy ob ferved by hiiMajelly's Government towards the peo ple of Ireland, and feverely reproved the indifcretion of a Noble and Learned Lord refiding in that coun try, in having, in his correfpnndence with the Noble Lord of a different religious perfualion from his own, circulated fentiments and opinions tending to uphold the lamentable abufes which had fn long prevailed in that country, in which he was lorry to lay there appeared a difpofition, on the part of the wealthy, w opprefs and abufe thofe who were naturally enti tled to their proteCtion. Lord LIMERICK condemned, in very fpirited language, the obfervations of the Noble Baron, and maintained that these was no difpolition, on the part of any of the opulent clalres in his country, to up pr efs any of their fellow countrymen. Lord ELLENBOROUGH defended the charac ter of Lord Redefdale, and complained of the man ner in which the letters alluded to had been fubmit mitred to the public eye. It could not have been done without the commation of a crime little Ilion of purloining them ; and as, to ufe a homely adage, the receiver was as bad as the thief, he could not conceive that any Noble Lord would have ventured to allude to them in that Houfe. He did not mean to apply this obfervation to the Noble Lord. Lord DARNLEY faid, that from the dyle of tone and manner which the Noble and Learned Lord had lately adopted, he had entertained hopes that he had found fome means to dived himfelf of that difpoli. lion to invedive. His Lordflaip oppofed the Bill, and was followed on the fame fide by Lords Har rowby, Spencer, and the Duke of Montrofe - and was oppofed by the Marquis of Sligo, Lords Hobart and Auckland. The Houfe divided on the third reading of the Bill : Contents 94—Non•Contents 61—Majority 33. The Bill was then paffed.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. - - MrAHAW took the oaths, and his feat, as Member fat Dublin. A wasp from the LDP. figuified their Lordihipe concurrence to fundry private Bills. Sir WILLIAM GEARY brought up the Report of a Bill for the Ercdtion of a Workhoufe at Woolwich, iu the County of Kent. which was received. The Medway Canal Bill was nod a fecund time. The Wrexham Road Bill was read a third time, on the motion of Sr GIORGIR COIN EWA L L, and pared. Mr. H. LASCELLES noised for leave to bring in a Bill for the better Regulation of the Wool Manufadture in the County of York. Admiral BERKELEY obiedted to the principle, which was defended ►y Mr. Wt ,aud a Committee was appointed to prepare and bring in the fame Sir R. BUXTON moved the third reading of an Inclofure Bill in the County of Wilts ; which was read a third time and pared. Mr. WILBERFORCE praente4 a Petition front certain Per lons of the Society for Bctteriug the Contlittua ache Poor, pray log far Parliamentary aid in fupport of an eftablilliment for the extermination of the contagious or putrid fever. A fitnilar inintution had been pruduelive of the greatcß benefits at Man dialer, and the metropolis W3f much more in want of fuels a benevolent inftitution. The Petition was brought up and read, when the Srr*tea obferving that It was neeeffary to have in 1 fuch cafes the recommendation of the Crown, the CHANCELLOR of the Exentqpe a fignified that recommendation. The Fight Millions Exchequer Bills, and the One Million and a Half ditto, were read a fecond time, and committed for to g:1101 (9W. Mr. CALCRAFT gave notice of a Motion for to-morrow fennight, for further Allowances to the Volunteer& MIDDLESEX ELECTION. Benjamin Weak was called to the bar to be difcharged, he bay ing been imprifonal for negleding to attend the Commons on the Miedkfex Eleftion Committee. _ . . The SPEAKER addicted him in a very imprefSve and empha tical manner, obkrviog upon the nature of his offence, and re marking that the Hoare potelled the power of overtaking and puniihing thole who committed offences zgainft its jolt authority: in confequenee at which be had been imprifoned ; but the Hoare being willing to believe that his offence bad proceeded (tom Igno rance and not from intention, had accepted his fubmiffion, andbe was now difcharged on paying the ufual fees. Mr. HURST moved that :he Addrefs of Mr. Speaker, on this occaSon, be inferted in the Journals.—Carried. lIELAND• The trim Revenue Regulation Bii; was read a feeond time. The Holy Orders' Bill was rsad a fecoud time on the maims of Dr. Do igestan. Mr FOSTER prefented a petition from the merchants sod mauu.adtures of trills linen In I)ublin, which was received, and ord. r‘d to lie on the table; he alto matted to withdraw his original motion on the Irith accounts. A converfatioo enfued, In which Mr. CORRY obierved, that there were obitacles to the fpeedy nredudion of fuch accounts which did not oda in this country. 'the Parliamentary year in Ireland was different, and the effects co adimilate the modes in the two countries had act hitherto produc• ed the Intended effect. ~ Mr. FOSTER laid a few words concerning the coofolidated fund in Ireland for the lilt year, which was not yet laid an the ta ble, after which Ole motion paffed. Mr. C. DUNDAS moved the committal of the Prokentlon Bill, winch went through the Committee. Mr. FOSTER moved for an account of the Confolidated Fund In Ireland for the laR year, ending Jan. 5,1803, and complained of a IIIiftUCIIMM in the accounts prdellted this year. The Conf.- lidated Fund was Rated at 9,50e,0001. which was an overftatement of 1,600,,..10c1. He Mould there fore move that the Accountant- Central of Ireland do amend in. return, esplaining the particulars. The SVRAKER oLkevcd, 'has in point of torm the motion Ihould be, slut the Ardent account be withdrawn, which Mr. FOITER accordingly moved. Mr CORRY laid, th.,, if an .rn tr. was certainly en important one, but he was fore • hat the Int • .dation of the account could not Ise erroneous. The Right Honuai Ali.: Gentleman hal never men , tinned the cireumnance till Low, and the.r fore he mutt skied to the motion at prefect' ;At a entice. After lonic con•crf-•wu ot. t. point of order, 111 r. POSTER. g..•r nonce for co-tntrrrw. I.r 11..5a ,reltard, that t h.. et ror con fiat d Itt tht officer's har.t,i; Rated a grofs rec,ipt, without &dun two for eircnces of toll.rboo. lir tht-o ga•e a notice oi hi. mo -611" Lord FOI.KESTONE ttrrog!:t there was no parliansenury t.f • gc v. hick tclidcrcd it neeetl.ry to stye a notice on 'very occatiou n(a :notion. 1 he AKFR (aid thane ms no ellablitied law, but the mew Jet, h-J been Co and it owl been found highly conve ni,nt for the dJpateh of public boGnefs. r. f 0:-• 11. R gavr ;:t 4.f a Motion for an Account of all hr ir; ; ..ed to keel Cia.—es in Great Britain, hccc Jer.uary the I.r; canverfatlan cancel on the falrjen of Notices, In which Mr. l'nftrr, Mr. lorry, the Attorney General, Mr. Fuller, the Chancelke :be Exchequer, &o. tool. • part ; and the Speaker expe...ence, with gxcat cleat na. and pt etifloo,theufatebol the Houk in ter our of NotlrL _ _ Mr. f• OSTt.h. then p•e not.ce of a motion f.ir Col d • aof fop. tlr) r mut - shin rclatJvc ca. the Pilpolitioo ut Lirauta is Ittihad. LOYALTY Lome. M. )d NT made his promifed Motion relative to the in' -tnißs of the holders of Loyalty Loan. He entered into a minute hiftory or all the particulars In any fort connefted with the negotiation of that Loan, the palling of the Aft which legalifed the tranfaftion, and every fubfequent event, by which he thought the faith of Government was in the leap implicated, or the interetts of the holders of that Loan affefted. The Loan was propofed on Thud day the ift of December, and by ten o'clock on Mon day the sth, the names were put down for the whole amount of 18 millions. On the aid of the fame month, when the Bill received the Royal Affent, there was the fum of one million five hundred thou land aftually paid down on the faith of the agree. ment which had been made with the then Chancellor of the Exchequer. There were feveral meetings had afterwards; and different opinions were known to have been given as to the legal interpretation of the precife terms of the Ad. On the whole he argued that, if the fubfcribers did adually expel to have a right to demand re-payment in two years after the ratification of the Definitive Treaty of Peace, it could not be deemed confiftent with the honour or good faith of the nation to permit individuals to lifer by any embarraffinent or doubtfulnefs in the formation of an Ad of Parliament. He therefore moved that the Paid At be referred to a Committee of the whole' Houfe. Mr. VANSITTART, in reply to the °Nations of the Hon. Mover to the conduct of his Majefty's Mi nifters, maintained that they had purfued the line which, under fimilar circumftances,their predeceffors, or any other Miniflers, would have attended to, namely, where a doubt exalted as to the interpretation of an Alf of Parliament to confult the Law Officers of the Crown—who upon this occafion had delivered an opinion that differed. it was true, from that of a refpedable barrifter (Mr. Pignt), but he mull Rate that which came to his 'knowledge, that the cafe up on which the Learned Barriller alluded to had pro nounced an opinion was erroneoufly drawn up, and particularly with Yelped to the date of the Definitive Treaty of Peace, or otherwife he prefitmed that no difference would have exalted between that and the opinion of the Law Officers of the Crown. Mr. BURROUGHS argued that the refolution of the Committee of Ways and Means, which immedi ately followed the propofal made with the Subferib ers to the Loyalty Loan, was a confirmation of the bargain which they concluded with Minifters, and that any deviation from that refolution in the Bill that was grounded upon it mull have been a miftake. for it was impoffible to fuppore that any breach of faith with the Subfcribers could have been intended. The opinion of the Law Officers he maintained to be not perfeBly agreeable to that which from all the circomßances was to be meted, for as they admit ted the cafe to be doubtful, he conceived that their duty was to lean to the fide of equity, and to attend to the well founded claims of the public creditor. Mr. PITT concurred in opinion, that the prefent queftion relied entirely on the good faith of Parlia ment. and not upon its liberality. He confidered the Houfe as bound to fet the matter to rights by a conftration of the Aft which might be favourable to the fubfcribers. The original contra& was bind ing upon the Houfe of Commons folely, becaufe every thing regarding fupplies depends upon the de cifion of that Houle. The money was generally paid upon the refolutions even of the Committee. The day of payment, in the prefent inflance, had been pollponed, not with a view of varying from the bargain, but owing to the circumftances of the times. It was thought belt not to have the firft pay ment till after the dividends had been aired, but in point of fad, many perfons did not wait for that period, but paid upon the faith of the refolutions. If the Subfcribers were not regularly informed of the propofed alterations of the bargain, then a breach of contra& certainly was the relish. He ac knowledged with great concern, that Come miftake had happened, and that fome blame was attach able to himfelf. It was certainly proper to put the moft favourable conftrudion upon the Ad towards the Subfcribers. The opinions of the Attorney- General, and Mr. Pigott, had been taken upon that Ilatute : the one thought that the fix months might go on current with the two years; and the other, tnat they were to be fuperadded. He corn curred with the former of tittle opinions. and con cluded with agreeing with the principles of the motion. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER laid, he thould be inclined to ad nit the force of the Right Honourable Gentleman's reafiming, and that of the Hon. Member who preceded him, ;1 there were not ciicomllaiices in the cafe to which neither of them had teemed to advert. The difcretion of the Houle was not tied up by any refilutions of a Committee. Tire money which was paid upon the faith cis thole refolutions was not available till after the Bill had received the concurrence of the Lords and the Royal Mint. It was nothing Bile than a depofit at the Bank, whir.h remained till the Bill had gone through all its Rages. The notice which had been flock up at the Bank contained the reservations to which the parties fobleribed, fubfequent to which the refolutions of the Committee were agreed to.— Good faith did not require that Itch bargains fhould always be made in conforn y to fuch refolutions, becaufe, in every Rage of the Bill, fome alteration might take place. An application had been made by the holders of the Loy. sty Stock for an additional bonus, in confequence of the lots they laid they had fultained from a depreciation of the fonds, and for an interval of four or five months, the contraft having been made when 3 per Cents. were at 56 and had fallen to 46 or 47. The grotinds on which this application had been made acre, that a fecond Loan had been made for the fervice t f the year. At that time the language of the Gentlemen who have fpoken was very different from their fentiments now. The attention of Parliament, and the atten tion of the fubfcribers was particularly called to the tranfadion of that Loyalty UMW., and to the Ad by which it was to he railed, by the great debates which took place in Parliament at that time. There was not then one word of complaint, by either party, againll the alterations which took place; the parties had, thervore, a fair and full opportunity of knowing the determination cf the Legiflature— To fay that parties were thus to take advantage of their own ignorance, and come fornard with cumplAints at tlubpct;gd, was applying a new ciple which might prove a dangerous precedent. It was his duty to attend to the opinion of the offi cers of the crown while the parties may fill have redrefs in a Court of jußice. The fithfcribers, how. ever, had not a fort ground to Rand upon. If the liberality of the Houle was to be appealed to, w e muff confider who are to be the *eels of liberality and who the objets of jultice. The public intereft had a claim to our consideration, and it muff be a fatisfadion to the Houfe to be informed that the original fubfcribers will he paid at par, and receive lomething more than 7 per cent. and no lofs would be fufained`by the polific. On there grounds he could not violent to the motion. or the objets of the Hon. Gentleman. If however, it fhould be the .pleafure of the Houle not to aequiefce in the motion, he thought an arrangement might be made with the parties ; that the time of payment of the bonus might 6* delayed till the time of peace, when payment would take place with left inconvenience to the pub. lie than at prefent. Mt. FOX laid, that his view of the fhlajed was . very nearly the fame with that of the Right Hop. Gentleman oppofite (Mr. Pitt) under the gallery, and that of the Hon. Gentleman near him (Mr. Bur ' roughs). It would be a monfrous propofition, to fay, that Parliament was to be fettered in the fob fequent Rages of a Bill by the refolutions of a Com. mittee. It would alfo be abfurd to fay, that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had the power of entering into articles of agreement which were not to be fubjed to the controul of the Houfe. There was, however, a neceffity for attending to good faith with thole who had fubfcribed in confequence of fuch articles and Refolutions. The .depofit al luded to had certainly been taken as a security, that the futafcribers would attend to their bargain.— It had been Paid, ignorantio furl, Itentinem extujirt, that he would grant ; but were they, when they had thus made a bargain, intelligible by there refolutions, to fay it was the duty of every individual to watch the progrefs of an At of Parliament, left any al. teration of the terms should be introduced t It was grange to hear a perfon endeavour, fire, to argue away the right of thofe fuhfcribers to complain, and then to fay, that fomething might yet be done to give them relief after this motion is difpofed of. What would be Paid of an attorney, were he to draw out a leafe contrary to the original articles which had beets entered into by the parties ? He would certainly lofts his chanter and reputation in regard to his prole& lion. It has been argued, that the prefent was an inconvenient time for granting the accomodation re quired; but what would be the confequence Inert any man to fay.. after having entered into a bargain, that he felt it exceedingly inconvenient to pay toool. to the perfon to whom he owed it ? It was peculiarly indecent to hear filch an argument let up in that Houfe, and he hoped he Should not hear an oblation of inconvenience, in point of time, again Rated by any Member in the Houle, when the quation was fo evidently regarding the good faith .f Parliament. Mr. TIERNEY obferved, that unlefs the Honour. able Member who had jut Spoken on the other fide meant to introduce party fpirit into every quefliony be law no reafon wby he Mould have difctiffed this fubjed with In much heat.—or charged his Right Hon. Friend with intending to violate public faith. The Right Hon. Gentleman argued in favour of the opinion of his Majelly's Law Officers upon this fub jai, and the condo& which Minifiers bad purfued, He particularly endeavoured to imprefs upon the minds of Gentlemen, how ferioufly a vote in favour of the motion before the Houfe, might operate to embarraf. the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his dealings to-morrow with the Gentlemen whom he was to meet on the falai of the new Loan. They might well (peak of a material change Since their salt interview, if the Houfe fhould give a vote that would imply that the holders of the Loyalty Loan Zooid be immediately paid. Mr. CANNING called the attention of the Houfe to the nature of the deprifit which was ufually mad. in bargains of this kind. If the depoßt operated as an obligation on the cnntralors, it mull be equally binding on Government. He law no reafon why the bargain fhould not be equally binding on the one party as on the other. Mr. TIERNEY explained, and vindicated the Ratements he had formerly made. Mr. PITT declared that he had not a very dillind recolledion of the terms contrafted on, or the alto. ration that took place, but was certain that no corn• munication could have been made to the holders of the loan in regard to that alteration. He regretted that he had not a difinft recollection, but entered into a detail of the circumfatices, fer tar as his recol ledion could fervc him, and concluded by Rating, that on the ground that the notice fhould be given at the expiration of the two years from the figning of the preliminaries of peace, and the fix months added to the two years, the time of payment would turn out to he pretty neatly on the loth of Oftober. Mr. TIERNEY again explained. Mr. H. THORNTON Miffed that the opinion, if there was any, should be entirely in favour of the Proprietors of the Loan, whereas inflead of par, to which they were entitled, they were only receilflag 94 and 95. The Chancellor of the Exchequer and Mr. Thorn. ton reciprocally explained. Mr. MORRIS thought that from the Stock being at dilcount the natural inference was, that the hold ers had not fufikient confidence in the faith of Go vernment. Sir W. PULTENEY was of opinion that Govern ment fhould raise no money to be paid at a certain fixed d.ty. It was this dangerous mode of borrowing money, the Honourable Baronet alledged, that had rained the French Government, and which might alfo be of ktious inc.liveniense to this Country. The AT FORNEY GENERAL fpnke at ihrre length against the motion, and principally - contended that the terms uf the loan were not to be gathered from the relolutiunl of the ClOllllll tree, but from the Aft of Parliament as explatiatoi y of thole ref - Motion , . Mr. S. • ThIORNTON, hunt the connation he had woli the Bark, knew that no communication had been made in that qiiarii.r i f th: alteration that had been introduced into the ter.ns of the Loan by the Aft of Parliament tuldequcnt to the resolutions of the Committee. A d.sitiun being now called for, the gallery w'-'s cleared.—Ayes, ;G; Noes, !c.o. Majority against the motion 2 4 . The rithei eirders of the day being difpnfed of, ties adjoutoed at Lalf i:aq ten till to morrow. I k receivi In 3Pe 3r 4r sr /nir Tr Iri the T iron M•] dies ] of 1 der eonf tefi Mon By dilin and 1 meat much chip I much two F that I. Yer Chief the I. fquate Lord( rdf on WI Earl receive the Du Eaves 44 Fun 0 By i pfx.l - , f March, of Cur 4ken b n our 11 411)JU' 8 gun wa 4 iMMI 1 I Wu, /V.n la BREA priCe t:f t , ~'