Star. — London, England, 1807-06-08 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGkNCE. IH SONTINOSTION PROM THE PRECEDING PAGE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 4. . • THE RING V. MEMEL LOVELL. Mr. GARROW moved the fentence of the Codrt upon the Defendant who had admitted judgment to go by default, on an information filed againtt hint for a libel upon Peter Climate, Efq. a Co-partner in the firm of Media. Lang/ton, 'rowgood, and Co. of Clement's lane. The affidavit of Mr. Cazalet Rated, that the De fendant was an infurance broker, and having received ;nitrations from a foreign hook, of the name of Provitte and Co. in the year 1794, he preluded a policy upon a cargo of fugars !hipped in the Dame Martha, for 'the fignatere of the Defendant. With 'hie requeft, Mr. Catalet complied, to the extent of fool. The cargo of the vetiel, in its way to this country, received damage, and an average loft was claimed 'of the per fons who had underwritten the policy, by the owners. Moll of thole whole names appeared upon the infirument, fatisfied the demand, among whom were the executors of the Profecutor's brother Mr. Willam Cazalet. When, however, the Profecutor was called upon to pay his proportion upon the film which he had underwritten, he refuted to fatisfy the claim, Aligning as his reafon. that a fettle: ment had taken place between him and .a Mr. Du bois refpeding the infurance, and that his name ought to have been crated from the policy. By this non compliance, the Defendant conceived, that the houfe for which he a.fted was intened, and a correfpondence was entered into between him and the Profecutor, the fnrmer thinking that Mr. Cazalet only employed the affedged fettlement as a pretext to avoid the pay- Ment of the average. After numerous letters had been written by both parties without any ultimate explanaticn being given, the Defendant addrefred the following note to the Profecutor : " Sta,—.Previous to a general circulation of the inclufed papers refpeding the infurance, I think it proper to fend one for - your perufal, and (ball wait for your reply until Friday next. I am, Sir, 48 Your humble fervant, 78, john-ftteer, Fitzroy fquare. v. Lovit L." One of the incloted papers alluded to in the above note appeared to be in the form of a hand bill, which had likewife been interted in a newfpaper, and purpor ted to give notice of a file by public andion, if not difpoted of fooner by private contralt i at Garraway's eoffee•houfe,on a day mentioned, of a claim of 1461. as. creative of intereft from the year 1794, upon Peter Cant alet,Efq. A ft er Rating at length the nature of this demand, it concluded with the talloriing expreffl , n e. The above claim oiling out of a policy of infur ante got a foreign merchant rtirel, fettled by all thdintriters but Mr. Cazalet, who has hitherto tvaded piyineut by retorting to the meaneft fubtcr Asp and claleanet7. l * The other papers contained in the 110 W were general printed flatements of the na ture of the tranfaftion, reprefenting the conduct of the profecutor id >t light highly derogatory to his eharietet. The di urt engttired what were the words charged to be libellous, and it was anteered, that the words charged in the information were, " who has hitherto evaded payment by retorting to the meaneft fubter rage and chicanery." The affidavit of Mr. Cazalet likewife contained various other letters, written by the defendant to dif ferent gentlemen in the City, which alto were in tended to injure the profecutor in the opinion of the world. One of them, in particular, was addretred to a gentleman of the name of Welton, in which the defendant, after having given a general outline of the tranfadion, wrote as follows: " If Mr. Cazalet thinks to vindicate his innocence by his fortune, he will be molt egregionfly minaken; but I know full well, that be will preferve his fortune at the expense of his honour." The affidavits of Mr. Jafeph Kay, the Solicitor for the profecution, and Mr. Peter Hyatt, confirmed the flatement made by Mr. Cazalet. The firft affidavit read, on the part of the defen dant, was his own. It entered much at length into the general nature of the trantadion, and traverted the Itatement made by the profecutor. The objed of it was to prove, that no fettlement had been made by Mr. Cazalet with Mr. Dubois; but, on the dm trary, that the average lots upon the turn underwritten by him was Hill due to the hoqfc of Provitte and Co. Affidavits were likewife read from James Dubois, Efq. and Mr. Wm. Cazland, to corroborate the Elate went made by the defendant. The ATTORNEY Get/Last felt it a painful talk to addrefs the Court on the part of the profecution. ft would, however, be his duty to make forme obleiva- Lions upon what the defendant had faid, what he had written, and what he had fworn ; for they were all contradictory to each other. If the Learned Counfel might be allowed to judge fiom the condutfl of men in the ordinary intercourfe of life, he muff fup pole that Mr. Lovell had a deep intereft in the reco very of this money from Mr. Cazalet, for he was lure that no good man would have condefcended to con dud himfelf as the defendant had done; and he was' convinced that none but a bad man.unlefs he had been greatly interelled, couldhave ventured to placehimfelf in fuch a fituation. It appeared that a .policy had been fubfctibed by the profecutor and fume others, and in eonfequence of a lots, a demand was made upon thole who had underwritten for a per ceatage. This claim Mr. Cazalet had tefilled, on the ground of a fettle meat with a Mr. Dubois, about which there could be no difficulty, becaufs happily it was in writing, and ligned by that Gentleman. In favour of the 'Defen dant, Mr. Dubois was not unwiUing to go as far as truth would permit, in the affidavit he had made.--' Even the libel already publifhed did not feemtr have fatisfied the mind of the Defendant, for in the year 4504 he profeffed his intention of publilbing fuch a 'calumny as would effectually ruin the charm der of the profecutor. The prcrent information was not ex hibited fur the purpofe of injuring, in the finalleft de gree, the Defendant: al•hough Mr. Lovell's °tied was to traduce the protectstor, Mr.Cazalet's with was so vindicate his own, without atperfing the charader of another. Mr. GA tt ROW, on the fr.me tide, contented hinsfelf with making this tingle obtervation r " The and ag• 7Tav .tiog fad in this cafe was, that after the Defin. slant found that he could not enforce his demand in a Conn ti Ju(Uce, he reforted to the expedient of at. tacking the Prclecutor's eh:rater, to extort payment by intimidation." Mr. TA DDY iv ifiled no more than that jullice Mould be done to the Profecutor. From the year t 794 to the prefent time, Mr. Caaalett had been fubjed to the libels of the Defendant, a fpeeimen of which had been read to the Court in a letter to Mr. Welton.— The offence offered to the Profecutor had been pUblie, and all that was defired was, that the vindication might be as public as the afperfion. Mr. DAMMIL contended for the Defendant, that at lea there exifled a probability that no fettlement, with refped to the policy, bad taken place ; fur it was the known caftans when any payment had been made, to (tribe the name of the underwriter from the policy, whereas no cancellation of it, with refped to the Profecutor, appeared upon the face of the indru ment. At any rate, it was evident, that a claim did exit*, and in the opinion of the Learned Counfel, the demand for the payment was juk and the refufal improper, efpecially when all the eo-fobfetibers had fettled the lots. The condud of the Defendant was' not to be jullified, but he hoped there were fume cis curaftances of mitigation. Load ELIANBOROOGH...'" To be fare it mull not be endured, that any man (hall be driven to the pay ment of any demand, which could not be enforced in a Court of Law, by the lath of a libeller. Let the Defendant Rand committed, and be brought up on Sattirdzy the 13th Want." JUNK 5. THB ICINC V. ABRAHAM NICAAN AND ANN CRANK. This was an indictment againft Abraham Hearn and Ann, the wife of John Crann, and the anent had two counts — one for again; ih r , and beating .Ann Haverton, with intent to kill and murder her. Another was an affault with intent to rasa her; tried before Mr. Jullice Hearn, at the Taft Affiaes at Ann Haverton had taken a place in the waggon of which Hearn was the driver, and his brother was the owner. Ann Crann was a paffenger alto, and there was a perfon of the name of Hewett, alfillant to Hearn the driver. The unfortunate young woman who was affaulted, being auleep in the fore part of the waggon, was awakened by Hearn pulling her about and behaving rudely to her ; (Le refilled him as well as the could, but became afterwards fo terrified that (he did not know what happened to her, except that the was taken out of the waggon about eleven o'clock at night. She was taken down into a lane, and led by the arm by Hearn, where the was beat cruelly, kicked upon her fide, and cruelly abufed, and there left by Hearn. The mail coach guard difcovered, about three in the no sting, by his' lamps, where the lay ; he took her up as the lay al ma lifelefs, he rut her into a waggon, by which the was carried within three miles and a half of Colchef ' ter and was fuppofed then to have fallen out, for fhe was afterwards found between three and four hundred yards from the road. She was then brought to Colchefter, where the had the alfittance of a me dical gentleman ; i,y whole evidence it appeared. that her perton had been violated, and that the had been cruelly beat. Ann Crann was heard to fay to her, that if the was not filent the (hould be put cut of the waggon. She loft her fenfes, and has never gained them lince, although this was in Joly talk. F,,r eight or nine weeks her life was defpaired of, and dunng that period Hewett was in cutlody, on fufpicion of having committed the outrage ; but for all that time there was r.o opportunity of inquiring properly into the particulars, until the unfortunate woman had an interval in which the had the power of telling what the reconciled of the Rory ; and the reafon why Hewett did not relate the whole at firft, as he did at laft, was, that he was under the influence of his em. ployer, the owner of the waggon, Hearn's brother. Hewett did not know that the poor girl was left in the line he thought the bad been brought in again with Hearn and Crann ; but after they had gone fome miles tot ward, he went into the waggon and milled her, upon which he propofed to Hearn to take a horfe and go back to fetch her. Hearn Paid, never mind, people will think it was fome body die did it; and Lid, if the witnefs wanted any money he lhould have it ; and defired him never to mention it. The perfon in whore waggon the poor girl was brought within three miles of Ipfwich, never after wards was met with. The unfortunate female was of weak intelleds, and had been drinking a little. Lord Eta.zszoioncst took notice of the favage inhumanity of Hearn, who refuted to let Hewett go back fur this helplefs victim of his brutal lull and cruelty. This poor female was infirm in her under amusing, and that infirmity was increafed by drinking on the road, and of that infirmity a bafe and cruel advantage had been taken. The Jury believed the evidence, and therefore flound Hearn and Crann guilty en the fecund count in the indiftment, which WAS the aleph with intent to raving ; and they came now to receive the judgment of the Court. Mr. Guxszt who had been of Count's! for the defendants at Se trial, fuggetled that the matter had appeared very doubtfol to the Learned Judge at the trial as to who prepttrited this *ft ; tut the verdia was now fatisfa4tory to the Court ; his province was at an end ; it was impiEble for him to fay any thing in rapport of &eh perfons. Mr, Huvraan Paid a few words for the profecution. Mr. Plaice Gaose pronuoneed the judgment of the Court on the prifoners as foflows: Abraham Hearts, and Ann, the wife of John Crann, you have been convicted, on very tiger evi dence, of which the Jury were the ledges. That evidence has been believed, and I agree with the Jury in the refult of it. What we confider ilk the circuni (lances, Poch a cafe as the prefect hae hardly ever before been brought before this Court, marked by - filch force and violence, upon a poor helpiefs woman, iluch as the profccutriz was. The aggravation of this cafe is very great, bush as it refpeds you, Abraham Hearn, and you, Ann Crams. As to yon, Ann Crann, your fez fhould have prevented you fiom'af fifiing in this force and violence on an unfortunate woman ; and as to you, Abrahank you were a pat ron who ought to have proteded tsia helplef. woman, from violence, rather than offer arty'- , --you were th e . driver of the waggon, and ought Co* proted all per tons and property committed to your care ; and the 'lds the was able to take care of herfelf, she mote care was doe _front you to her. It is impnfiible not to fee that yauln i it e r, and that was at one time p ro bable, have to r fur a capital crime in the cafe; for it is not owing to any mercy - which either of you [hewed to this unhappy creature Ile did not loft her life. She has, tower*, -liappenel to fur vive, in cvfequence of which you are here to anfwer to the juice of your country, as fur a nalemeanor only. As I Paid before, a work cafe than this can hardly era When one react% bow many pea •ns are obliged to travel by night in waggons, of which, if fuch as you are the drivels, we know not what to think. It was your duty to have protelted the pro fecutrix, inflead of treating her as you did with fuch abominable cruelty. For the fake of example, we mull take tare that the public !hall be fatisfied, that our punifirment on you shall be fuck, as that another fuch atrocity as this thall not foon occur. We have taken into confederation the punifhment you have al ready (offered [imprifonment (ince the month of July lan], which is a confiderable portion ; and hav• ing taken all the other cireutnltarices of your cafe into confederation, and intending that your cafe (hall be a warning to other: ; and to prevent, we h o pe for ever, the like abominable violence, this Court cloth order and .adjudge, that you, Ann Crann, be hip prifoned in his Majelty'i gaol at Chelmsford, for three calendar months; and that ycu, Abraham Hearn, be imps ifimed in the fame gaol for twelve calendar months ' • that during that time, you, anti each of you, do nand in and upon the pillory, in the Mat kct place in the town of Chelmsford for one hour on a market-day, between the hours of twelve at noon, and two in the aftersoduP THE KING, Itr JOHN MACCOUIg. - - - The prifoner in this Cale was brought up from Newgate, to be admitted to bail, having been com mitted by the Magifirates of Bow lireet, on fofpicion of forging indorfements and negotiating Bills to the alumna of 40001. which had been fent to London by different Merchants and Tradefmen, from Fiflterton, in Nottinghamshire, by the conveyance of the Edin burgh coach, and floten therefrom. It appeared from the examinations taken before the Magifirater, that about the 13th of March tall, the feveral motes in queftion were, by tome ferret means, embezzled or taken out of the coach beforementioned, and many of them negociated at different Bankers' in Derby• (hire, Staffordfhire, Cheller, and various other places. Thefe notes were indorfed by a perfoa calling him fell J. Warren. The prifoner was apprehended by Adkins and Anthony, two Bow greet Officers, and was four or five times brought up and re-committed for further examination. Fourteen or fifteen perfons were exa mined, but none of them could identify the prifoner as the per fon who paffed himfelf as J. Warren, and negociated there hilts, except three, who could only (peak to their beliet.--Upon thefe grounds he was committed by the Magiarates. In fupport of his prefent application to be admit ted to bail, the prifoner produced an affidavit, (worn by himfelf, Mr. Louis Brlngna, ref Govent•Garden Theatre, Mr. George Grimaldi and his wife, of the fame, Ann Thomas, Sufanna Stewartfon, Letitia Harrowby, and &velal other perforis, who clearly and circumliantially deferihed the prifoner to have been in their company, or tranfading bufinefs Kith them in or near London, from the 13th of March until after the zoth, in the courfe of which time the bills in queflion had been negotiated in the counties of Stafford and Derby, and at Cheller and other placer, upwards of 130 miles from London. Some of thefe witneffes (Grimaldi and Bologna) had ac companied the prifoner one of thole days to Wo wich, where they performed in the entertainment of Don limn, at the Woolwich Theatre. • Other wit neffes fpoke of his drinking tea with thetn, going to the play in the evening, purchsfing goods, &c. at loch times as made it impoflible that he could be ab• fent from London, fo as to be able to go to thefe va rious diftant places far the purpofe of negotiating the bills in queflion. It further appealed, that the pri foner had been for many years in the habit of keep ing a diary, from which lie was able to account for every measent of his time. After hearing Counfel on both rider, the Court tronfidered it a cafe in which the party might he per mitted to bail; and the prifoner was accordingly en larged, upon entering into fecurity, on three feveral indictments, himfelf in 2001. and four lurches in Sol. each, upon each indidment. THI ZING V. JOHN ffiIVARD3.. The Defendant in this cafe was brought op to re ceive the fentence of the Court, having fuffered judg ment to go by default, upon an indictment for ob. (trading Davis and Rogers, two Excite Officers, in the difcharge of their duty. On the part of the protecutior it appeared, that this trantadion took pface in Merionethfhire. The Excite Officers met the defendant, with two Andes laden with a quantity of fpivituons liquors, which, upon examination, turned out to b 4 about fixteen gallons of brandy, and two of rum. They accord. ingly feized it, knowing it to be run fpirits, and put the !pyres into a Court-yard, with the feiced goods, as a place of fafety, when the defendant broke into it, and took one of the holies away by force. The defendant's affidavit Rated, that this trantadion took place fo far back as the year 1799, and (*non - after he , was brought before the Magiltrates, and fined 71.7 c. —He rented a fmall farm for 171. 17s. per annum, which was the only fupport of himfeif and family. The. ATTOaNIT G6,NERAL, for the profecution, obferved, that the indidment was certainly preferred in 1799, but the defendant had taken good care to keep out of the way ever (ince, until very lately, win& was the real enure of his not being brought tn . for judgment before. Mr. Bsvaw, for the defendant, raid, his client had been brought up ft.om Cardigan, it Atm expellee his fmall pittance could ill afford; he, hirwever, for. rendered himfelf to the mercy of the Anoint' , Get sera!, trolling in his humanity. Mr. juffice Canso, io paffitsg the fentence of the Court, lamented that pedant ot this defcriprion will not it;tderflend that the law mutt be obeyed by aft claret of perfons. He was then ordered to be corn. minted to the eullody of the Marital of the Marfhal lea for the (pace of fit weeks. crobsety 4: nocitiike no co. This was an ingtinientfet down fpechlly, involving the qualm, whether the Plaintiff was entitled to re cover of the Defendants an infurance made upon the 1 life of the late Mr. Pitt.' It appeared that Mr. Pitt was indebted to the Plaintiff, and that he Wined his • the with the Defendants for gook for feven years, paying a premium of t$ guineas per annum. At the expiration of three years Mr. Pitt died, and the , debt Was paid by his executors, but it did not appear i vu the proceedings whether Mr. P. died infolvetit or not. Subfeqitent to the payment by the ei ncuton, an aCion was brought, and the plea was, that the Plaintiff had not, at that time, a fofficient intereft in Mr. Pitt's affairs to maintain an atlion. The quellio n was not decided, as it (tends over to have the cafe amended as to Mr. Pitt's folvency at the timt of his death. stZyn WARRANT°. Mr. Nast obtained a rule for an information is the nature of a leo suirrernio, commanding Mr. Hats. kins to thew why he ezercifes the office of one of the Aldermen of the borough of Siltafh. The objedions to flees Gentleman w•ete two ; that he had not received the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, within tweltre months previ , nat to the Election; and, ft. eondly. that the meeting being held for the fr.le pur. pofe of his elellion,the Mayo- prrceeded to cleft three Burgeftes, who were to vote for Mr. Hawkins. Ihd: of which were corium) , to the Charter. BIRTH. At [Atli. tbe Lady et Capjait; John Al►le, Gra _ SAARRIhD. _ Tuef4ay LaR, at St. Gorge's, Hanover ftivare, by fpccita the Rev. G. Savage, F.A S. Vitar o. Kitigitutt cunt iclt Rettkor et St. Mary, Albermary, &c. &e to Mrs. Ayliff , .1' Sur • bitotl Lodge, 1K inglturi, Surrey. On the aid ult. at Edinburgh,the Rev John Falconer, Mil l in er of Fyvia, to Mtfa Margate! Totieh, yenuterft daughter of the de. meted Wm. Touch Lig. late of his IVlAcity's Na v y. Lately, at Britiord neat Salifbury, the Rev. Frank Ellis. Redlor of Long Crompton, — Warwickfhlte, to Mifs Jtretrife, daught er u g the late Rev. G. T. Jervoife. anti liner to Col. Jcrvoife. Latefnat St. G:otge's,Hanotter-floare, Mt. Wm. E Bradfo r d. of Wallingford, Berke, to Mifs M. A Fairld, titbit tlewOoer ut Mr Wm. Earle, hookfeller, of Albtmarle Itreet. Ott Thurfday lett, at St. George the. Mtttyr, Q2 . eetes ftittart, by the Rev. H. T. K. app, Nicholas Efiard Rohinfott, Efq. of the Eland of Cuernfey, to Mifs Roche, daughter of the late Mr Pet r Roche, of Rotterdam, Merchant. DIED. On Thurfday Jul* rcipetied, at the advanced sr of ss, Mrs. Knapp. the mother of Mr. Knapp, Mosher for Abingdon. On Thurfday lA, at Clout-niter place, Mita Helm &Unlike. Hardacre, cidert daughter of H. f Hardscre, - TO-MORROW. Sun 'gas t &n lets Most lets 47 minutes after 113 mkores after I 3 minutes afar is liiGH AfrolMg iYN traj ReforMON - ft' annum Ain- 4 Afternoon .• • 31 01012111 M, OW 4 PUBLIC A DVAN rA GE, T _ HE advantage tote public mull always derive item rtgularly cdtteated profeillunal nu is dfredi ca eltifively their Redid; to out fpctits cf malady, was nevermore clearly deroonitrated than by the unexampled fuccefs which has attended the elminillration of that new remedy, and the extra ordinary cures it has performed. For a loos ferlesof years, Mans CUR RIE and Co. Surgeons, formerly fu his Majefty's ferrice. have Made the Venereal ()desk the partiettlat oiled of their fn velligation, and ate happy In having difeoveted it medicine hipt• nor to mercury in the cure of that complaint—it is fufficiert to oSferve thst the cfeas of this remedy are I , umetriealty Oppollte to thok of meruuty,for thought completely eradicates every vellige of the virus, in its molt confirmed Rages, yet it dote nut is the Ivan injure the conflittition—on the contrary, it renovates the If. tem in all its natural funfilotn, prontotse appetite. and facilitates tfigettion—thus inftcad of reducing a Run% and vigorous eonfilto• tion to the frightful condition that memory does, it not *Ay pre knee that contittution in its primitive Rate, but reflores a weak and debilitated one to its natural llrengsh and vigour. Numherlefs inftancel are on recent Wahl of the fop; riot lam, of this MiAkine, its inherent and freihe virtues attling as a per petual corredlive to bodily debility, whether proceeding (runt an excels of conjugal or illicit pleature, .or from tlu mor. infiduous, though not left dna! Relive Indulgence of incau tious youth of both fexes in a certain pernicious habit Amidft the melancholy variety of diforders which are the enufequence of this folitary vier, there are none more afiliCting than that thitrelliop Ram of debility and deficiency, which prevents or embitters the no-. ttimotdal Rate ; the unhappy fuffercr broods aver his raibfortum, albsated to feet relief, until bets reduced to fuck a Rate of weak tiers as to render life opprellive. To fuels perfons it mull be a con futing relleCtion, to know that they may now, by a new lufaUible mode of treatment, be rationed to that great& of ad 414011411 /*d ings, a ilron‘. manly, and vigorous cond.:Yu t iote. In al cafes of debility, deficiency, front ',hatter tilde ariku./. as well as in every fpecies cf . ^I infeetinn. Mars Currie awl Co. may be eonfaked by patients of either fez, with the steam: Gamey and honour, at their houfe, No. toy,liatton Garden. Letters from the Country (poll paid) including a bank note. wild have the utceffary medicine and advice fent to any part of tbx Kingdom. 140. toy, Hatton Garden. XII HEN Profeffional Men of Education and RL. w fponithility deviate from the general Syltem by the feieteimi of a particular branch, the fandlion of bag continued fuccctcs is the heft critetion of fuperiosity. Thirteen years have . 1 devote - al my pradiee to th:exclafive tree meut of Three Diforders, and the fuccefsful refs* of my plan gdlrcii me additional ardour to vppofe, as far as I ant able, the ravages of thole Complaints which are the mutt important in the Catalogue of Haman Inbrmiles. After initiation into every Branch. as an Army Surgeon, r formed a with at an early period of pranice to rekes from the ignorance of uneducated men, or the equally dangerev. precipitancy of general Pratßitioners. 'I he Three Difirders, to the cure of which ! have devoted Env attention, centprife every fpecie• of VENEREAL INFECTION. whether of a recent or long duration; oily, all kinds of whether arising from the habits of fella,. buys. or the Indulgence.+ of mature age ; and.lattly, that dermgcrnent of the fylteni in wt. men which is cllicd BA RRENN ESS, or STERILITY. Numerous Ertfeafes are the refult of ignoraoce, nr hatte in ttr treatment of a fins* Gonerrhae.. ; and it not unfreguently lop pals that the feeds of Life are puifoned by the Indifert don of as unguarded hour. By a fuperior meth() t fuck Complaintsam arty eurcd; and, even when others have failed, I truft that f may re fume to offer a radical re-eltahlilhmem. Few, however, are the cafes of complicated dittrcis in this AV order, compared with the calamitous litustions of men, wiw. lowa an indulgence in a folitary vice, or the prevalent gaieties sif falblonable life. acquire that flare of debility , which is the ua voidable confequence of fuck pernicious. h Where the unhappy fufferer broods our his :nicety, bat falt• fully conceals his misfortune, it may be fame confolatio• ter toil to know, that although it be an object of doubt or recenaltar with other praditioners, the removal of there deticienciet by um gradual progrefs of renovation, is the acquirement of my erpcd ence If the rites of Bacchus or Venus have begun to reduce/11-L.; vigour, much anxiety will be preet.r.ted by as early coentervm , (*this languid Rate; and in chck caketlo great iliflletiley will Ml' • But where this deficiency has fur yams (anti, a proper I • - verance is indifpenfably teguifite to revive the flumbeting tr.. Of life, and to re-onintate Ike conßitution. MARRIED WOMEN, who have long been difappoiotr , their expedations of a family, may 1).: allured, that to mo 3 ..;•• lances, Nth-deka' are curable by Medical kW. The fecrecy which is fo effential to my undertaking, and t 7:! qealificatioto which I have ?telt:toed to hate, form the WE' 4 my pre-tenuous, and in cf.iincidenoe with fuch this intimation given, that Mr. Broe may be coafulted pisfonally„ or by s cinclofing a intall Note), at his hunk, No. 29, Arundii-fir , .:, Swami, near Temple-Bar. lar There is at. additional Entrance In Water ftreetadjsi..,lri and the name Is on both the doors. MARTIN ER t;. , Member of the Royal College of Surgeons in land: , t• A.Catrnoss.--Some Perfone, who falfely affcrt /bewitch . .. 6 be Mammies of THE ROYAL COLLEGE.hafing for fora-al pail copied my Advertifements alaiott word for word, and infc.ll4 them as their own produethans, ft is my dozy to mention. thole l'erfoos are ua Members of any College id London, burgh, or elfewhere; nor have they atty right to pradice 61 . 1 414.!. in London. N. B. A Lilt of the Members it published at the (41 t College la Liaseebee4in Fields,whicli mai be t•;' ,~--~ ~•f LONDON: Haut( awl pub/fled by LEVEL KENT, (of C. tcrbury•Place, I.lmbeth),at the Sr.tik Orrice No. t, tlreet. Publilhe4 alto at be Sint Pinot, Tonic Ba:., ir