Star. — London, England, 1816-04-03 00:00:00

f ... -.: — throm•neeme s. - that a . more deleterious ingredient could not he used in any liquor than vitriol. a ,very small portion of which would be sufficient to poison ; strong man, and though the quantity Mixed in a large proportion of beer, might not be Sufficient immediately to de still life, yet it was evident that di: tonstent drink * thg n' a limier, in which even 'so inialri portion of It Was used as to give it that particular taste which it was intended tea give, would' be extremely prejudicial to healtli. • It, was not like quashia and some other iniredientit which were frequently mired in porter, it was corrosive in its nature, and might subject the on. happy man who was in the habit of drinking the liquor hilt which it wasinixed, painfnl and lingeng diseases,. whir" u ruild only tertninati. (firee,heare) He (Mr. BrOneham) did ili! 'toean twisty that is was the ;rit!rtion of Mr. Abbrit produce any bad ef fects by tide mixture of this article inthis beer, or that he thought it eoulil produce that effect ,whichhe had described. He b lieeed Mr. Abbott to be a Man of a very ;raid character--one who raid not wilfully give such a del: olious ' mixture to the public. To *oppose that he would consent to this, would be lo charge him with a felony. But he wished par tidularls to call the atropin!) of the 1 - I , iuse to what had been stated by Mr: Abbott, in the Memorial Which he sent in his defence. rat this Memorial; he stated, that he did not know of any such ingredients hiving been put in his beer : though he had been in the trade for nearly thirty years, he did nut know of what matetials his porter was:made.' He stated, that not' having had the benefit of a liberal education— ( Murk laughing)--he was 'ignorant of eliat aas clone in a business iu which he had been so long engaged, And he brought forward a servant to prove the igno. ranee •of the master however, admitted that two, or three piiunds of vitriol had been discovered in his brewing place, but denied having any knowledge bf it or its uses. It might be. true, thAt he did not know of this de)etetions artkle baying been used in his business; but tinfortiinakly for fins, the Commis nioners of the Board of Excise were not ignorant men. They were inert of. education, and intelligence ; and they not only knew.that vitriol was Wvery poisonous ingredient for human use, but they also ascertained that two or.three pounds of some prepared powders, and fourteee pounds of vitriol or copperas, had been found at Mr. Abb.,t's brewery, and that the vitriol or copperas was contained in two boxes, which, it lull, would have contain td is6lbs. (Hear, hear.) It must be evident that this vitriol was intended to be mixed with the beer, and so the Board of Excise conceived, and he - (Mr. Brougham) contended that there was no. Jury - of Westmiuster or Guildhall, alio would not • on their oaths have found that those boxes which con tained those 141bs. of vitriol, had not been filled with it, because they would have very naturally conceived that two large boxes would not have been used to keep a quantity, which might be contained in a amall one. • But this was not all which had been discovered i'n Mr. Abbot's brewery. It. was found that some *mall quantities or deleterious ingredients were scat tered in different places, and that the servants bad been so anxious to conceal what had been at last dis cerned. that the officer who examined die plaCe could .with difficulty find it out. Here then was a use, where it was manifest that the servant in Mr. Abbot's employment had used poisonous drugs in the manufacture of his beer. Here had a case been made out, which called for severe punishment, and this was the case which the Lords of the Treasury bad conceived it so light a nature as to remit the fine wliich had been attached to it. (Hear, kear.) . — Ho should next come to :the test;monials on which this mitigation had been founded. The first bad been signed by Mr. Marryatt, the second by Sir Edward rnatchbiill, and the third by an Honourable Bayo net opposite (Sir Wm. Curtis) all three Members of Parliament. These testimonials gave a character -of Mr. Abbot for honour and irot4rity.• which he (Mr. Brougham) did not deny. they stated that Mr. Abbot had fallen a sacrifice to the misconduct or -ig norance of his servants: All this might be true, but there were testimopials of a different description, to which he (Mr. Brougham) wished to allude. The first was one signed by one of the Members for the Borough of Canterbury (Mr. Baker), who warmly recommended to the Secretary of the Treasury (Mr. Lusrungonj. who, let it be remarked, was the other 'Member for Canterbury, to use his influence that the prayer of Mr. Abbot's Memorial might be complied with. He (Mr. Brougham) did net doubt that the distracter of Abbot . was sush as it had been described', neither did he doubt that Mr. Baker was Of rfectly tweet in recommending his friend to the favour of the Secretary of the Treasury, but he had merely mentioned the circumstance to chew bow extremely dangerous it was to have so great a trust reposed, as that which the Lords of the Treasury nont possessed, -in perions who were liable to clash in the discharge of their duty with so many and`such powerful con teuding interests aithose of County or Borough Mem- - bees. These was another testimonial iu Mr. Abbot's fa • your c which, though of no great importance in itself, was worth the attention of the House, as being one of the many on which the Louis of the Treasury had founded their ultimate decision. It was a letter from the Dean of Canterbury (the' very' itevetend Gerrard Andresva.)' The very Reverend Dean nays _in his letter—" I have just heard that my go o d neigh bour, Mr. Abbot, of Canterbury, it likely to get into some trouble respecting an information laid against him about his brewery, the nature of which, however, Ido not .uaderstand. Ever sine; I hare known him, he has appeared to me so good a man,' and so urea; a Magistrate, that j should be very sorry to have that usefulness vliminislikcl, by his being brought forward in she public an a matter which only concerns ale fkiaiers—(it laugh)—aad I hear has its source" in' malice; for I will venture' to say, that Mr. Abbot has main reality beets io blame. I have taken the liberty of mentioning 'hid because I thihk it my duty to pre vent evil—and to lateen the influenceofh useful man unnecessarily is if great' evil; and it by producing this letter to those whom it May concern, you can serve him and the public, I shall be much gratified, &c." was a ;nail extranedinary testimonial which the • worthy Dean rut forward in defence of his friend.— B ecA use; tortootbs, the matter could 'only affect the iia c a cry the health of ale-drinkers it was a matter of consideratihn, and not worth having his good ,friend Mr.lAbhot brought into trouble about. (Hear, -hear t and a iner4. ) :%v:lbe good Dean in the simpl ic ity of mg h eart iogesideffitiFis• le -drinkers merely as so many feria astara,"•whoilb it war dil be of very little owe- , •. . • quence to ;et rd of in MT mar ter, whom every oar was at liberty to destroy, and whose existence was in no manner •to balance against the influence of Mr Abbot. (Nee, hear.)—But the House and the coon. try would! differ from the op i nion ef the . vorthy and would think that ale-drinkers were too valuable a portion of society - to be exposed to deltruction by the fraud or ignorance of Mr. Abbot'i servants.,Thst Honourable and Learned Member then called thvat— tention of the House to the. decision of the Bard of Excise, and observed, that hi' their report on this case to the Lords of the Treasury, they disproved Many of the statements made by Mr. Abbot in 114 memo rials. They stated' that the charge made against him (Mr. Abbot) was for one of the grossest and least pardonable offences which, could be committed namely , the mine , adulterating ingredientsin his beer, whereby not merely the revenue was defrauded, but the health .0 his Majesty's subjects highly endangered!' ,They air) stated, that there had been found fourteen /rounds of vitriol (not three pounds, as stated by Mr. Abbot in his Memorial) in his toners ns ; that the ser wants could not have used such an ingredient without his (Mr. Abbot's) knowledge, as he must have Air covered it by the payments made for them; and they concluded their Report with these words:—" UnJer circumstances of so flacrant a nature, we cannot its nk the rnetrerialiat entitled to the least favourable re gard ; but we shall consider it nor indispensible duty to renew the proCeedings against tam. and bang the same - to issue with all plissible dispatch, useless we should have your Lordships' p •itive orders to the cteitrary—to perfectly satisfied are we of the validity of the evidence now in our hands for convicting t •st Offender ; and ae . _regret that the cause has been so far delayed froth an ix Mete representation, totaliy false and greundless."—This was the utibiassed opi nion of the six Commissioners, whose names were signed to their Report. These names were : M. Wish, Lord George Seymour, George Watson, A. Phipps, B. Sydenharn, and Mr. Serjeant Kinky. They were all men of the highest character for ho nour. and could have no one motive for doing any thing partially against Mr. Abbott; on the contrary, they were from their connexions likely to be influ enced more by the views of the Treasury•than against them. Every motive of interest and eminent)°, if any such could be supposed to have infltience with these Commissioners, was rather in favour of Mr. Abbot. Yet with all this, these upright men, in the conscientious discharge of heir public duty, gave the Report to which he had just alluded. And what did the Lords of the Treasury after this report, and with all these facts staring them in the face e They make an order for remitting the whole of the fine.-- -(Hear, hear, from the Treasury 'Benclets.)--Mr. Brougham begged pardon, he found he had been mista ken, but there were so many cases of this nature, that the mistake he had fallen into was very natural. -The Lords of the Treasury did not order the remis sioo of the whole fine, which would, if the proceed. gs were carried into effect, amount to several thou. sand pounds, but they ordered the Board of Excise to stay all further proceedings against Mr. Abbot, lon his paying a fine of di.500, and the costs ut the CrOwn. He should then ask, what were she grounds on which the Treasury came to that decision f They were simply, that Mr. Abbot did not know of these deleterious ingredients having been used, and that he . should not suffer for the crime of ethers.—(Hear,l hear, from the Treasury Benches.)—He was glad to find by the cheers of the Gentlemen opposite that this was agreed so. He was glad that they admitted a distinction between guilt in point of law and in point of fact, and he would be glad to see that this orinciple was carried farther in other masers.. Fh would wish to see that this distiection was adopted in those cases where the law of libel was concerned.— 1 Crt a former occasion he (Mr. Brougham) had ad. vetted, though unsuccessfully, to the question of pe titioning to the Crown for mercy in cases where no crime in point of fact had been committed by indivi duals. who were, nevertheless, severely punished.— There were several cases of punishment for libel. where the parties punished had been entirely innocent in point of fact though not guiltless in point of law. He instanced the case of Wakefield and Cutbeil. where the latter, who had never written the libel, and who, in publishing it, thought be had been pub. lisping the raises of a Greek Bard, yet still he had been convicted and severely punished. It was even proved, by affidavit, that Cuthell was out of town when the work , was printtd by his men ; yet this distinction between guilt in law and in fact was not then mde.—(l/ear, hear, /oar).— The next case to which the Hon:Member alluded to was that of one Wolfe Benjamin, a soap boiler, whose penalties were also remitted after judgment pronounced against him ; but he was a loyal man, and had been recommended as such by one County and two Borough Members ; though he could 'hardly see what connection there was between soap•boiling sad loyalty.— (4 Astegh.) —yet this soap boiler had a pe nalty of £l2OO remitted. The Act was thus evi dendy made an engine for political purposes, and an instrument of gross fraud on the revenue. The last 'me was that of John Gibbs, who had contravened the Salt Laws. After the prosecution had been gone through, and the amplest evidences brought forward, on the part of the Crown, be pleaded for the mitika tcd punishment of 411600. He set forth many things In a memorial, which were all declared to be unfoun ded by the Board of rads,. A testimonial is his .flavour declared, that he was uniformly loyal, and ihewed his seal on all occasions for his Majesty's Go 'eminent. This testimonial was not without its weight, and there was also another procured from the Member for Chichester. The Report or the Board of Excise declared, that he had attempted to bribe the revenue officer, and decided that he should pay MOO. The Treastiry, however, only atteaded to the recommendations of loyalty, aid remitted the pe nalty. The Hon. Gentleman concluded by moving a Resolution—" That John Gibbs, salt •factor, had his penalty remitted to him after judgment was pro nounced against him, and that the Act of Parliament vesting the powers in thenihad been used most un- Justifiably by the Lords of the Treasury." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUM stated, that a number of cases had occurred wetly similartO those which had been brought forward by the . Honourable and Learned Member. It had been shewn and decided, that it was every day's practice for the Treasury to histruct' hil Majesty.' Attorney General to assent, when necessary, to IN , setting aside judgmatift in favour data Crowe ppd. asopt ' . • • I _ . . • • • • trdm a . leaiibe la* ariser h a d eipressirstated, that I* sods things are proper and'consistent with the lasi." He should nett revert to the case on which the Himoutable dentleinan founded his charge against the Treasiiii. there were only two of the sir cases which he had stateciwhich came under the Act, the authority of which be disputed. The House would recollect the manner in which this subject was origi. nally brought forward. The Honourable Member had moved for all the cases within a given time, . which inroonted to 'l9, only six of which he had thought proper to select. He should remind tire. House that several papers, and amongst others the Supervisor's Report, had never been laid beforethe Treasury Boar d, and it was upon those papers that the great points of this question, were founded by the Hot i . Gentleman' The excess, it would be observed, in the salt, was so moderate in the present instance, that it might be accounted for by many other means than by sup posing a fraud. It was only 16 bushels over SOO which it ought to have been, and this might be ac counted for from had weather, the mere action of the atmosphere, or from an error in the weighing. The Right Honourable Gentleman then proceeded to ex plain the various cases which had been stated by the Honosiable Memb-..-r, none of which he coasidered as throwing any disgrace or blame upon the Treasury. Mr. PONSONRY thought, that the defence that was set up was, that some of the Papers had not been laid before the Treasury. The Right Honourable Gentleman then observed. that the opinion of the Commissioners was entirely against Mr. Gibbs, and, tl,at the s verity of the law had only been relaxed-by tits atrachmr•nt to Government. The SOLICITOR GENERAL pointed out the propriety rif vesting in the hands of the Commissio ners of the Treasury, as acting for the Lord High Treasurer, a re mitt ing power—and defended their con duct in the different cases adduced by Mr. Prougham, in *proof of an improper exercise of their authority. Mr. LUS}tTNGTON defended the conduct pur sued by the Commissioners of the Treasury, which proceeded on fair and impartial principles. He scorned the imputation of the Learned Gentleman, that they acted from motives of political influence, and he threw lit back to him with the utmost contempt. ' Atter o few further observations from Mr. nEORGS Rosa, Mr. H. D.ivis, Mr: Pnormurox, and Mr. Al derman Arusi, Mr. BROUGHAM shortly replied. The House 111611 di sided.—ln favour of the Nl°. tig)n. 4 B 1 2 }—Majority against it, 713. Brimparte'S Detention Pill went through mince. Report this slay. The St. Helena inter course Bia vee!bt throtigh a similar stage. The other Orders of the Day were then disposed of. Adjourned at 1141:-patt Two. ORD:CAN-Wl' .^I:DUCTIONS. •lIITIIACT 91 AS OtIFICZAL roam*, SOPPLIMLOTART To Tot o,oNatict SittwlNG 110311 g tIISTRIA TIONS, OM AND NJUTARY, TO lli Apt 111• TEAT DR PALTJJLNT. 9'&DINARY. V DLit TUE MEAD or SALA itlEal TO ISAITY.R-r.ENLAAT.. &c. Tow Ea AND PALL-tam-L.-5 messengers, Inspector of build ing materials, superintendant of tradesmen, assistant superin readmit of sbipplog, Mitst:l IP zrthitva, assistant inspector of Una arms, clerk dr Lawi,haru, 3 darks to treasurer. • k II; .. HAD OP WOOLWICH. LAROSA roar.--.l.irr-tnahrers at Portsmouth and Plymouth, prepared in three nioaihs; 1 asnivaat fire master at Woolwich, hi at mcon•la. • LlibPi.C'fOlt OP AlLTlLLF.kr..—Assistant Lopector, one clerk, writ:int numellers. ROYAL CARIIIAOII DTPARTIKtNT,-.-SeCOlid assistant inspec t'''. S constructors, 4 juniur ditt u , master aruficen, 3 clerks, I dra'eginansan PJCIILT FA/Lb.—Clerk of the cheque. BARAACZ IhrworateN Of 36 barrack masters are sup pre►sed—Canterbury, Colchester, Christchurch, Clacton, East bourne, Eaeter, Lymnigtoss, Milford, Newcastle, Nurthileet, Ringnier, Rye, Shortichit, Warley N B. 'lle barrack• fluster. lu Ireland are now under confide ration. FOREIGN STAT/01M—Sur nam and Curscoa, nine other esta blishments reduced to an afficur at £l5O per annum, and two establishments to be raised by £4OO a-year, making a difference of £i,:£4.l annual saving luctrocuTs To Tat Town, k:.-4S assistant-clerks, and 561 artificeti and labourers reduced; bit' as the sum reduced al ready from the estimate of !NS it X150;00, or three-eighths, it is not expected that ads article can yet bear any more. Missrwar Conts.-3 troops horse artillery (officers transfer red to.the driver corps); 1 tr4op rocket brigade; riding-house, Included in driver corps, reduced one half ; medical establish ment, which was reduced from 102 ro 64 persons in th, csti mares already presented, is further reduced by 12. MILITARY AIIANZMY.+I2 Cadets. The annual saving on the above reductions amounts to £38,422, and the actual saving for the present year to £20,480 10s. EXTRAORDINARY. WORIS AND RUA** 2.—in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia to the amount of mea,l9B; In the West Indies, £13,2116; hurl sant, Curacoa, and St. hustatia, £l4OO. CneTztwat.--Connnunicatiun across the Medway, £41,24; Repairs, X 10,000; Contingent Engineer Department, £1,000; Portsmouth and Ocispoit, £►0,000; Contingencies, £662; Ply mouth, £3,000. - Woomststs.—Military Ferry, .1400. GamiaSlNo.--Military Ferry, £800; Laboratories, 6E5,000; Weedon, two Clerks, .1141). Current derriere and Contingencies in the Artillery Depart =era abroad, #20,000; the Sallie in Stun-keepers Department, 113,000; Contingencies of Firl4 front, .4:4,000 ; Contingt ueie. for ltvlititary Corps, A'6.4,100. STarr Pir.--Inspector-Gereral of fortifications, Adjutant- Geneva, Colonel-commandant of the driver corps, being made a Major-general, fseid duty pay to engineers, overseer of coast batteries, forage for ail horse, reduced, upon eighty-heavy bti 'odes ; ditto for 1114 draught horses upon four troops of horse artillery reduced. These reductions In the extraordlnaries amount annual) , to mei un,9Sit tot. and for this year to £109,471 Ss. To which is to be added £llOOO from the expected sale of horse,, making the total for the present year ,ell/4471 Os. sd. IRELAND.—No accurate return of the possible further reduc tion having been received, it is at present confined to the removal of the Commander of the Royal Engineers front the Staff, and the command pay of the Major-General Commanding the Artil lery. Also, a reduction on the sum fur Walks and Repairs, to the amount of 'EL 0,000. These reductions make, in Irish money, L 11,460, and is uer• ling £10,5711. RECAPITULATION. Annual Saving. Reductions in the Ordinary 38042 0 0 Dkto Extraordinary 146,939 10 0 Actual Saving. at 10,480 10 0 119,471 5 0 16501/11 10 0 Reductions 1p Ireland 10,578 0 o Iskost is o 10,578 0 0 £l7sps9 20 0 Prom the actual saying is to be deducted the charge of allow ances; remucerationa, &c. to officers reduced—Allowance to General Man, as inspector general of fortifications, is but of his Staff Pay, 4710 to Geo. Macleod, as deputy adjutaut general, in flee of his staff pay as heutenant seserale.4lo3o . . •' ; . raving • -a aC149,520 IS 0 • • 12,922 10 4f:J7,307 . 5 01 THP: EVItNiNc ,ON 1)( ).\ WEDNESDAY, APR PRICE OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT Reduced (shut)—Cuns. mo. 6 Gel—for 4 per Ceti'. (shut)-3 per CI a;. b 9; Ouns. pay. 1611 —Excls. Balls ss. 2s dis. The country must receive m serving that the pledge gi%en t Sptech of the PitINCE R Etan; 1 , sent Session of Parliianetit, is act o It is alledged, and we believe tx 66 imp uience of foliation" expre: the redemption of this pledge woi tardy ; but mo matter. the bents! Ministers have certainly regained by it a pni;i„, i that confidence without which they could not 1 :44 continued in their plAces. When the Estimates were first laid before ie r ie s , meat, it was maintained that for the piesetit th e ". penditure could not be farther reduced. 'll e v , ite of the people, heard and proclaimed in the f 1 ale of Commons, has had its due influence is indi c i ng 'sisters to revise their labourl, for nos ‘4 , Income Tax rejected by the House, than rvide tlee was given of their intention to art about letrtach. ment. Indeed. this was rendered indispensable ; tot the revenue being reduced, a reduction ot tip,„di tuo was a necessary consequence. What Ls brai n & ready effected holds out a fair prospect of lanb;e retrenchment. By the first Estimate, the dui, of General and Ste UiFtere, and Officers of fi ns , pitals was stated at 43110,757, by t! e amended estimate this has been reduced ,052,561 i, and even is the present year a saving of 431,024. is t) he eff ecte d. This saving was accomplished by going thrint: estimate article by article, ant' the result !lab bete, that instead of 3n Officers (reckoning a s distinct charm who received the pay of tank, in addition to that of Office) only 2:4 have been retained. But this is not all. Ily a new document laid be. re Parliamoit, and which we have inserted in its proper place, the cation obtain: an annual saving of £176,000, and an actual saving of 4150,0 W, so: one sl;ii.in e v. of which was thought possible by Minis. tern so lately as the 19;11 of February. This 'lnc:. meat is called a Sultplem tart to the Ordnance in mates:" In common times the term Supp/tetai ape plied to such a document would have augured as addition for expenses omitted to be provided for ; bit here the addition to the original is in fact t deduitiak May we soon have more similar Supple:nand The Paris Papers of Sunday reached es this mom. in. We subjoin the most interesting pan cf their contents : PARIS, MARCH St. In the Secret Committee of the 29t the Deke de Mouchy developed his proposition, tending to prenut the Journalists from given ; an account of the Secret Sittings. 'file Chamber ordered the motion to print d and referred to the Bureaus. Although nothing official h.s been publis'•ed, its certain that his Majesty has condescended to con. mute the capital punishment pronounced against Cc. neral Debelle, into a detention of ten years. Count de Viomesnil, Governor of tIY, 13th Mi. Lary Division, at Rennes, has transmitted by tele. graph, his request for a comniusation of the sentence of General Trarot, and his Majesty has acceded to it. A letter from Rome. of the 20th of Match, laY4 gg Within these few days CArdinal MAtotr.has been released from the Castle of St. Angelo. He is now in a religious house to perform his spiritual tardier: When he leaves this retreat, which is purely religioty., he will be relieved by the Gr an d P en i ten tiary from the censures which he has incurred—he will be re stored to the good grace., of his Holiness, and will proceed to his Bi s hopric of Nionttilascoue. A very singular rumour has preVailed in the City this morning, that BONAPARTE has escaped from Sr. Helena. We luven.n been . 4i>le to trace the report to its source, nor do We cr. , ,!;t it. Brussels Papers to the ii a , :lr arrived this morn ing. They state the arrival o: (.I!ner4l ALSVA, the Duke of WatutceaToy's chief A.l.! , :•detamp, at Bro. sels, on a special mission. They contain no ctitce intelligence. We learn by Charleston and Virgini3 Papfri, that an epidemical disease, very destruct:7e in its e lects, has again ma.le its appearance in Virginia and North Carolina. Tiie mortality among the tants of the adj.iiniNg Counties t.) Norfolk hAs es' ceeded the ravages of the fatal epidemia in the sistr• of 1814-15. The ZE1:10111A sloop of war, Captain Deievrgi 11 " .rived at Plymouth on Ntind iv, last fromSE reknit. RAMSGATE, APRIL 2.L—Arrived trims °rend, shast &clack this morning, the Prince of Winerhp• Packet, is - ith CAI" taro L. Geatvr, of the 78th Z;eginten,, and •*n•trzern wher stagers, principally foreigners. l..rd Liverpro..l Pox , : sailed for Ostend CM: day at noon, talcine "yr:. I rivut. Ihsreats. of the - Guards, and thirtveu or fourr. 11,r passengers. h • new Packets hare lately been bunt un:ler the hist ( 20 and are ready for launching ; nt :Item are her the oset•va trade, renatkably Ent emu's ct ;heir class, iod fitted up, sal' cabin-work. iu a most iupert) man: er—the othr.r tur va . re.'t passage Yew., to tun betwren I.m•don atot Margate . Upal ,of 120 tubs of smuggled brandy were nights tr.:J at eratt stairs, by Mr. Aldridge, of the Cuoom Lowe there. • CONN EXCHANGE, MAUR LANE, APRIL S. prevalence of easteziy winds keeps our ni.irket tier , 1 supplied with all grain ; and as all tine Wheat t appeared this mornio:l w4s dispo,ed of, olr 1 0.40$ such kind Are nominally as on th.it LW kV, \1 Peas, Be4zis apd Oats, fully mAintai.. Mont.iy's . . having very.lew samples in either .it mai Ito. LONDONi Printed by Levs'. new r, Placa Wu, rubltaked there, and a thiStar-CAlce, Temple Air • . % :t LI. 3, IHI6. R'~l.i•t'rrel.() w ice. GIP! 4,. inch pl'Pitire in to the Public in t , (1,1 opening the [t, ny bviug tedeentee. uly, 'hat but tor t 4 • !, b , e d by tbe I etaj oold have bey. Ne t rtit is the :P.tae, end