Star. — London, England, 1809-02-17 00:00:00

. . . seined ta tiro ee three daYs? A; No, I doulited Tice tile !eufed*.efirs IWO= - influence at that time. '• ' • .-- Mlbea.regtOrvid bfilik - f the Committee." -Qt {By Mr.•WurrslZAD- I can you say p&flti ... yellerried - eridlOtit *di :'coder. you cannot product the note ?A. I hevoit i lf -..' Mr: . 81.1 . MNER sci . livnit tOthe Nouse the neves abbot me. -Q. Is it possible far you to find it'? ~ s nof-takmg.pOssesstent rpers of the prisoner, 4 ern. ISo not know ;. I hope it is.- -Q. What rebind listite- - aid: -wife shotild . ' you for that hope ?A. Because I put kin tisyl . The SPEAKER widen' 'Honourable Member bureau, among other papers.-Q. Has antrele butt could state mai* eatoe'fo • t!iir e, that wou dl•bear yourself access to your bureau ? A. None. but. niy yen such is 'proceeding , 'there were precedents they wife.-Q. Have you given it to any person to keep ? .Could act on. . A. No.-Q. Is it destroyed ' A. I don't kno*.-- I Earl TEMPLE askiff:Whether a Committee might Q. Did you give it to be de stroyed ?A. No.--Q1 nettle appointed to make se search. He also thought Are you sure it is not destroyed ? A. I aim very his wife ought to be ordered into custody. clear it is not.-Q. Have you the key of your bu- Mr. PERCEVAL stated,diere vetsnotanything be: reau ?A. No, my wife has it..-Q. Why are you so fore the House which could' justify such severity a)the clear it is not destroyed ?A. Because I never desired taking . of the wife into custody. If it was necessary it should be destroyed.--Q. Did you neither destroy she rmght be summoned. it yourself, nor give it to any other person to destroy Some conversation then took place between Mr. it ?A. No.-Q. In what room is your bureau ?A. St-stsza, Mr. Bitrznm, Earl TEMPLE, and Mr. Pen- 1 In the sitting room.-Q. Have you examined the etvat, which was concluded by papers in your bureau ?A. I have a variety of pa - Mr. PERCEVAL moving, ii That one of the Ser. pen there, and searched without finding it. jeant at Arms' deputies, with necessary assistance, Q. (By Sir SarevaLßOstiza.r.) You say you saw should accompany the prisoner to his lodgings, to the paper ?A. Yes.-Q. Was it the one you got search for any paper relative to Major Tonyn's busi from Mrs. Clarke ?A. Yes.-Q. Did you read it on ness," which was carried unanimously. seeing it ?A. No.-Q. Then how do you know it The Serjeant at Arms reported to the House that was the same ? A. It was a remarkable paper , I Captain Huxley Saittlen was in custody, and desired could hot forget it.-Q. What was there remarkable him to express that he would be happy to come before in the paper besides the writing ? A. It was dirty. the House again. Q. Where did you put it after ?A.ln my bureau Mr. PERCEVAL said he would be happy the among other papers.-Q. When you searched there, Prisoner was allowed to come before the House. He was this the only paper missing ? A. Yes ;it ap- had not a doubt bat he woad. produce the paper. peared so to me.-Q. Who kept the key ?• A. Soak- Captain SAND Wks ordered' to the outward bai. times my wife, sometimes myself, and sometimes' it The SPEAKER . asked hits what he had to com was left in the bureau.-Q. If a messenger Were • nuinitute. sent there, could he find the paper now ?. A. I do • Captain Hoitter SA:NbEN then made the following not know ; I looked myself, and could not find it.- stateinent: I humbly hope this 'Honourable Q.. You said it was an unpleasant circumstance; what House will excuse rind pardon.my prevarication, I (Tod you mean ? A. I meant the whole business was come before this Hon. House to reveal the truth. unpleasant.-Q. When you first mentioned the note to The note isnot destroyed, 'I have it at my chambers; Colonel Hamilton, how did you describe it ? A. I if required, I . can go and put my hand on it. The said I had a note in my possession about this business. I note was given' me to shew • Major Twirl, and to Q. By whom did you state the note was written ? assure him his prOmotionevould not go on, if he did A. I did not state any body.--Q. Did you not state not pay . the money. "I Iliewed him the note, but took it was by the Duke of York ? A. I could ncif.--- u from him again. • He agreed to .pay this money, Q. Did yew? A. No.-Q. Did you take a copy and he was G a x erted. He g ave me five hundred gui of it t A. No; I had the original-there was no oc- neas ; I paid Mrs. Clerk 5001. and Mr. Donovan casion.-Q. Did you think this note was of any im- 151. I cannot say who wrote the note ' • Mrs. Clarke portant*? A. No.-Q. Was the copy Colonel Ha- told me it was•his Royal Highness the Duke of York milton took correct ? A. I do not know.- Q. Did wrote it. This is all I know of the business; and-I you read the copy ?A. No.-Q. Was there any sig- oust thii Honourable House will look with a com nature to the paper ? A. I do not recollect.- Q. pastionate eye on my extraordinary conduct." Whew hand-writing was it i*A. I do not know. The SPEAKER then ordered the Prisoner should Q. (By a Member.) Do you know Mrs. Clarke's be remanded. hand-writing ?A. Sometimes.- (A laugh.)-Q. Was The SPEAKER put the question, that the prisoner it in her's ?A. I cannot say.-Q. Did you ever we be sent in close custody to his residence for the her write ?A. Yes.-Q. Does Mrs. Clarke write in phrpote of •lookiirg for th e paper, which was ordered; different hands, or always in her own ?A. So difo and he was ord ered to be kept in close custody, except ferently, that I would net know they were written by. 'as to the . tents of the order. Captain Sanden then the same oerson. - expressed his hope, Viet the House would excuse the Q. (By Sir J. Gnettest.) Was there any person prevarication he It id been guilty of. He was ordered present when you were searching for the paper ? A. tete taken fmterthe Bar. •- None but my wife.--Q. Had your wife and you any Lord HENRY PETTY took 'this opportunity of conversation upon this subject I A. A great deal.- noticing, that under the circumstances in which they Q. Did you ever desire her to destroy the, note ? A. were placed,; by being detained to the late hour to No.-Q. Nor any other person ?A. None.-Q. Did which they 'were likely to be kept sitting, it was int yonever desire any person to take it out of your possible to expect a Honseao-morrow .; and as Mon bureau ? A. Newer. day next was fixed for public business, which he un- Q(By Mr. Baottunwr.) flow was the copy taken? derstood could not be postponed, his Lordship gave A. colonel Hamilton copied it.-Q. Where did you notice he would not bring on his motion till Tuesday put it after ? A. Into my pocket.-Q. Among next. . other papers, or singly ?A. Singly.-Q. Did you It was also understood, that Mr. Whitbread's' and put it among a bundle of other papers ? A. Ido Mr. Ponsonoy's motions should be fixed for the first nat recollect.-Q. Did you search all your boodles t convenient opportunity. A. Generally speaking, I think I have.- Q. How The house then resolved itself again into the Com can you undettake to say it was not in your bureau, mittee, when Mrs. Clarke was again called in and ex if you have not searched all the When ? A. I think amined by Mr. PERCEVAL. I have searched them all.-Q. When you saw Colo- Q. Do you recollect what passed between you and mei Hamilton at the British Coffee House did he ad- Captain Sanden, respecting Major Tonyn's impa vise you against destroying the note ?A. No.--Q. tience at the length - of time intervening in his appoint- Or any words to thit effect ? A. No. ment ? A. No, Ido not ; though I have been Just Did you not say you wished to forget the note t reading Captain Sanden's evidence.-Q. Does the A. - I said. I was sorry for the whole proceeding, it witness mean the evidence Captain Sanden gave on a was altogether unpleasant.-Q. What did you parti- former night, as contained in the fifth number of the cularly regret ?A. Having lost the note.-Q. How minutes ?A. Yes.-Q. Do you not recollect Cap. could having lost it induce you to say you never had tarn Sanden coming to you on the subject ? A. No, it? A. It was an unpleasant business through the Ido not.-Q. Do you not 'recollect Captain Sanden wlo.le. I was very sorry to have lost it. saying, that Major Tonyn meant to withdraw his de- Q. (By Mr. BATHURST.) Did not you deny, atthe posit on account of the delay ?A. No.-Q. Did ecnhmencement of your examination, that you bad you send any message to Major Tonyn by Captain such a note in your possession ? A. I knew then I Sanden ? A. I do n o t recollect that I did ; it is Dad it not. likely I' might.-Q. Do you recollect sending any On the request of the SPEAKER, (Mr. Abbot) the paper to Major Tony-n by Captain Sanden ? A. Witness was ordered to withdraw. What sort of paper do you mean ? The SPEAKER then addressed the Chairman. Q. Any written paper ? A. I don't recollect ; 1 There can be but one course the Committee ought to was always cautious of parting with any thing writ follow, I therefore move, " That Captain Linsley ; ten.-Q. As far as you recollect, did you send any Sanden, in the course of his evidence, has been guilty written paper ?A. No.-Q. As you say you were of gross prevarication." (A loud cry of hear! hear! cautious, would you not recollect if you had ? A. If from al l parts of the House.) Captain Sanden has insinuated I parted with any The questionwas then put and carried unanimously. writing of the Duke of York, I never did.-Q. Are The SPEAKER then moved, " That the Com- you sure you never sent any as the Duke of York's ? rnittee should rise, and the Chairman report." The A. Never, but lately, and once to Mr. Manners - Hnuse resumed, and the Chairman reported. Q. If you had sent it, would you forget it ? A. No; The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER I could not forget any thing belonging to the Duke moved, " That Captain Huxley Sanden should be of York. taken into the custody of the Serjeant at Arms for Q. (By Mr. FRPFMAI I / 4 7.) Did you ever receive any the said offence." • note from the Duke of York, on the subject of Major Lord FOLKESTONE moved as an amendment, Tonyn's Commission ? A. No, I was used to see him " That he should be committed to Newgate."• (Acre every day, except when he was in the country, and cf no ! no !") that was not more than a week in the year. Lord FOLKESTONE observed, if it were not the Q. (By Lord Foratstoer.) Do you mean to say wish of the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite, you did not give any note to Captain Sanden ? A. I (the Chancellor of die Exchequer) he would with- do cot recollect giviim him any, but especially of the draw his amendment. He thought, at the s a me time, D u k e o f York's, as I was afraid of trusting him.- the witness deserved the most severe punishment the Q. How citex it to occur to you that Captain San House could inflict. den insinuated any such thing ? A. Because he The SPEAKER then stated, there were two ways might have insinuated such a thing ; he is capable of to proceed :he might be ordered into the custody of any thing.-Q. if Capt. Sanden has represented any t he Serjeant, to be kept close confined, and no person note or Major Tonyn as coming from the Duke of allowed to communicate with him, or simply under York, is it true ? A. It is not. the inspection of the Serjeant at Arms. Q. (By Alderman Costae.) During the negocia- The . CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER tion with Major Tonyn, was it said he was tired, and said, the reason he did not wish to adopt the Noble would withdraw his money ? A. No.-Q. Did you Lord's amendment was, that lf he were in custody of express to Captain Sanden that you wished Major the Ser east eant at Arms, he would be able to accom- Tonyn not to be impatient, as you wanted money z ? to his•lodginjo; and search for the note. It A. No, I did not ; that would be a reason why I zany hi .might also be neceosarythat he might be called be- • should wish him to be impatient.-Q. In the last in ' forethe COmeainee, however defective bis.evidence tervitw you had with Captain Sanden, did he write was, if it wigs Made necessary in the course of the ex- • any thing in your room ? A. It is impossible to say, • • et any other witness. Il e then moved it it is so !Ong ago.-Q. Do you recollect his having -,. is: Jr in Huxley Sanden should .be kept in le:daisy thing there ? A. No, Ido not. of the Serjearit at Arms, and not for . 0 - .laran tbereany-paper close produced touching the - :ore on 4 set to have access to him ; one- that the Ser.. eof .York? A. No ; the r e Was not. atshoofel be:directed to bring the prieneez . horom -. • 4, IBySir Growl klua i l or Did you ever say . c omm i ttee o f the whole House, investigating mum. hbjo r '(By was 4 siedsliy 'to r being impatient it in his .recplle t ve &its tuigtflain* ?: tz, / diW het+ • ght him a perfect Gentleman when Mr. Donoyila intrisdneed - him to me, and wished to 4eke Lieutenant-COlonel... • . Q. (By Mr. Bitatrn,) Had Captain any interest, and what, .in then egociation • for Itlatot Tonyn'? . A: I believe he hai, for I have heara Major. Tonyn is very generous, and Captain Sandid is not a man to interest himself for any one without a reward.,-Q.', Did you understand no from Captain Sadden t Yes, and from every oi4lelnintioned: Q. Diid you understand the substance Of .Capttin asndett's last examination ? A. ,Not in the Q. Why do you suppose he meant to insinuate any thing ? A. Froin what a gentleman Do you mean from any question pAit to you at the bar ? Yes.—Q. Which ?A. itie the - Chancellor of the Exchequer. Q. Did the Witness give any tort Off the profit to Captain Sanden for The pion:ludo:tor Major Tonyn A. I don't recollect that I did,' he'used to help himself by the way.—Q. • Did you give him a_ny your self ? A. I don't recollect that I did.---S e er The. Wit ness has saki that Captain Sanden was• to have a profit from Major Tonyn's promotion—what do yob'. say on that subject ? A. I was to have 5001.. deal; and he was to get what he could from the othei party. He never did any thing for nothing ; Mr. PERCEVAL desired• Mr. Rei4, l _o Slatish; ter's Coffee-house, St. Martin's-lane, to be Oiled in, Mrs. CLARKI demanded of the Those . to knOti had tbey any precedent of two Witnesisei being called to their bar ? She was called to order. Mn.RststQ. (By Mr. PcncrvAL.) rib you know the witness at the bar ? A. Yes, I do.--Q. Did she ever come to your house by the name of Dowler ? A. By no other.—Q. Is she the person Yoe called Mis.. Dow. ler A. Yes. while these, gurk ; its to when 1)10 The Q, Is It was hand be Pothi Q. Did writing . Frintiaality the hA4ti- , other best, annusemi to guess 4nce• the ewe, thi waiting were oust I but ever ILv best 4 2- tin - sod gtrii4 pat bee= - [You may retire.] Mn. CLARK/C.—But before he goes, I beg to say, I never called myself by the name of Dossier; whit , ever I might'be called. Q. • (To M 17 .1 RRID, by Mr. A. BARINO Ditty& believe her m t ' 'be Mn. bowler ? A. I did Did you ever hear Tier say her name was Dewier.? A. I never did.—Q. BY whoin did you understand her to be ? A. By Mr. Dowler. Q. (By Mr. Wanin.e..) Did Mr. thrrierand she 'ever come tbgether . ? A. No, they did noti . [He was'ordered to withdraW.] Mrs. etatuts-- 64 I wish to ask a question ofi&e Crows Lavyers ?"-r( She was called to order.) Q. Did you know Mrs. Hovendon ? A. Yes.— Q. Was it when 'she was under the protection of Mr. Dowler's brother? A. He has no brother.—Q. Were you in the habit of visiting the Taylor's family-at e Bayswater ? A. Yes.—Q. Did you know her father? A. Yes.—Q. Was not Mr. Chance, the stock-broker, the same person ? A. No he was not.-:-Q. Do you not know Mrs. Taylor-' is a widow? A. Igo, for I know her huiband. Q. Did you keep a man cook ?A. Yes.—Q. Did you keep more than one ? A. He used to bring an assistant with Then you did not beep him by the year ? A. No, they. staid but a short time ; the Duke 'was very difficult to please. The witness was ordered to withdraw. Mr. BERESFORD then attempted to put several questions to Mr. WARBLE, but it appearing to be the sense of the House that they were irrelevant, they were over-ruled. - Mrs. Corti was nett examined, respecting the burn ing of Mrs. Clarke's letters in her husband's posses sion, which she did by his direction, at the desire of Mrs. Clarke, who applied to him for that purpose. After- the witnes.liad withdrawn, the House waited for a considerable time for the - return of Captain Sanden, who at length appeared at the bar. Q. (By Mr. PEiteivai..) Have you found the. paper ? A. I have.---Q. Have you it with you ?-'A. The Messenger has it. The Messenger handed it to the - Clerk, and in formed the House it was found in Captain Sanden's bureau, together with two other letters of Mrs. Clarke's, and a bundle of papers, which he likewise delivered in...Q. Loa at that paper, is that the one you received ? A. It is.. -Q. Did you receive it from Mrs. Clarke's own hand ? A. I did.—Q. Was there any person present ? A. -I believe not. Thu note was them read, and was addressed to George Farquhar, Esq. " I have received your note, and Tonyn's business remains as it wee (Signed) " FRILDLRICIL" Q. I ask you again, did not Colonel Hamilton ad vise you in the British Coffee-house not to destroy your papers ? A. No, I have no recollection of it.— Q. Did he desire you, after you left the Coffee-house, not to destroy the papers ? A. Never.—Q. What were the other papers ? A. Upon the levy and other busi ness.—Q. Why did yon deny the possession of these papers ?A. I have nothing to urge in my behalf. I hope the Honourable House will excuse what I have done.—Q. Did nobody tell you to deny it ?A. Ns'.— Q. What motive had you ? A. I had no motives—Q. If you had considered this paper to be of no impot tance, why conceal it ? A. I can urge nothing. Q. You must see a difference between an excuse and a reason; what reason had you ? A. I had no reason whatever.—Q. Can you suppose the House will be. lieve you came here, and told a falsehood without any motive whatever ? A. I had no motive, I have acknowledged my shame,' and I hope the House will pardon me.—Q When Mrs. Clarke gave you the letter, did she tell you it was written by the Puke of York ? A. She said it came from Do you know the hand-writing of the Duke of York? A. No. —Q. Are you acquainted with the hand-writing of Mrs. Clarke ? A. Yes.—Q. Do you know in whose hand-writing this letter is, directed to G. Farquhar, Esq.? A. Ido not.—Q. YOu have before stated Mrs. Clarke wrote in different hands, do yousay so now ? A. Yes ; you will find those there very different.-- Q. Have you seen her write ? A. Yes.—Q. In the conrse of your long acquaintance with Mrs. Clarke, did she ever communicate any thing on the subject of that letter from the Duke of York ? A. Never.— Q. Can you tell 'what she said, when she gave you that letter ? A. No, I cannot..--Q. Did you ever see her write in various ways ? A. No, but I have seen her different kinds of writing. Mrs. CLARCIC examined by Mr. PINICVAL. - Q. Do you recollect ever having seen that letter before ? A. I suppose I must have seen ithefore ;it is the , Dalterwriting ; it is direesed to G. Familiar, .F.sq. • I ¢o no; believe he ever wow to •07. title Itc. is never ma; were heuii _knew with DS; long kw A. ,01) ing .1 must be Pll_2 ten the. ought ow. ktteni Her mil then lect ' rd 1110`..- cnstodl and brinp the ► the out with , anchored pe.taon• the • from Dropt port oats Bth transport bound ► farad 17- George don, ' short cur, few small There Pie Arthur second that direction lint tarn w came -.• his pasetissiein t ' A. I do not'bsew...—Q. Do yo u ,lect giirinfit him ? A. No, bik I think I lutist • . 2 4 criye4 it Im. 1 krtoir fid other way to account 1•10 siting inhiftiossession.• Q. 1)o you ahvays wr i te ? A. c4nugot !sty ; _ I always write. in a hurry, Are both these' notes your hand writing ? y were written by other;lnyin . ' e she wrote them. .She has not written any thing NU loin- years, without myguidance.—Q. Did y ou le he; h o a both of them ? A. lam positive 6 one; bsit I cannot say which.—Q. Do y ou e the Lime when guiding your mother's hand, as n yon art not ? - A-. It must still be my writing. Do you not know there must be a difference ? A. upper one is mine. I do net see much difference. Z . Is the indorseinent on the bill your writhe, ras done in the same way.; -I guided my mother's 14.1 d ; Mr. Manners was by at the time. There could iothing criminal in that. On 1. Did you ever imitate any other person's hand. log ?A. No, not for wrong purposes.--.Q. No T' ti .dity is imputed ; did you ever try to imita le hand-writing of other! •A, have tried wi rr ladies, to see wise - coultlininittle.fiersens' name s but it is too ridieulOnt4ci Mention, merel; for asement a I have written.. Weeds, and asked them g uess whose it was like among their male acquaint. e..—Q. Was it part of duit play, or of the skill of Or Oattle s to, write sign, at wirly as possible ? A. unle-Okee.-02,' *el CIS kottnetane nay. w r i. • lately I was. aionoisig rittitif W i le i n : I\l ting the evening in this Manner.—Q. Whose band * you iraitatingi: A.. I was writing promisee- woe ly, antheas told it was very like the Speaker's, we I never saw him write.-4.4 laugh.) Q. Did rat Rel r try to imitate the I)uke of York's writing ? A. aee..--Q. Did you imitate it well ? A. He is the Li t jutlge of that. own 2. When you triecrto imitate, was it like his w r i. g ? A. I fancied it was: -7.Q. o you know a p er . of name of Town? - Yes.—.Q. Did he in- uct 'you' in painting on irelvet ? A. Yes. —Q. Did a ever tell biro• you would be likely soon to learn, he b :ause you ctitiM readily imitate various hand. wr i. cow gs ? A. NO : I could hardly tell him so—recollect is a Jew—;l4lltugh 1.--(2. Are you quite sure you rev did ; did you ever write in his presence. —A, .1) tyliive written while he was present, when ladies a4O present, and hare said so to than in his Fri aring. .He was to have had an interview with the pu uke, along with Jew King; but when the Duke ewthey were Jews, he would have nothing to do Sur th them. Q. Did you, in OA j, ever write a .note like th e 10T eke of York ? A. - If I had, ft would have been told ag before this: Dia ion Anal* the seal to that :ter ? ,a.. Yes, It teno n tluird . s private b fou - knoti - the MOO . ? Is it in Eitgibisk of French ? • It is in French.—Q. You do not recoUbct receiv. g that letisete the Duke of fork?' A. No, but, must have remitted it ; it is itik.nitihg, andike *Ol t. fit to to me.4.:-Q. Dld-yon ever' write to d • 'nisiof York e V i v a tercedellajar Tomint A. his A other questions of minor inspetunce were len pat to the Witness, and she Withdrew. Mr, PERCEVA I c onceived it was the wi hof ie House, that the best evidence that could be found aght to be brought forward to • prove whether the )te was ihrwriting of his Royal Highness or not. le thought tol. Gordon was the best evidence that 311!d be pioduced; and it being inapoosible that his ttendance could be had that he moved, That the CoMMittee should . ..risk and the Chair. ianreport progress."--Agteedto. The House resumed, and tisk gagtzstAN re. a o*ed that the Serjeaut had acqoinianted the visa. er to his chambers, and had hid befote the Com. aittee several.papers„which he found therein. The CHANCELVOR of the EICHEOITER hen moved, 4 , Thai they should io ect Committee, to investigate any i(nd whiehoftbetia elated to the business, befote the Cointiiittee of the vhole Houez." Agreed to ; a:neither ivollowing . COni: nittee was appointed Mr. I.4ech,h4r. Wardle,-Mr. 3rand, Mr. Creacker, and Mr. C. Mt. Writhe. The CHANCELWIL of the ,EXCHEQUER noted, 4 That Captain Huxley Sanden, then in the :ustody of the Setjeant of Arms, should be commit. ed to Newgate," which was carried unanimously. Lieutenant. Colonel .Gordon was ordered to be iiimnumed to attend the Committee to-morrow. Adjourned at Four c"Clock. Don Pablo Cheia.tos has arrived in town with his family ind The Venerable is arrived at Liverpool, from Barbtidoes. She brings accounts to the Sd ultimo. And we learn by her that the project of an att4k on Martinique is complaely Ten sail of French logger privateers were seen yesterday from the heights at Dover. Thirty stout lugger privateers are fitted out at Calais only, and many more at Boulogne and adjacent 1015. Deanna, Fes. ll.—f riday evening, the Fleet of Transports. with Gene ral Snatsaooar s and the Trtsopa unter his command, anchored safely In Cork har bour, having encountered much tem- pestuous weather—as soon as they ha*, talon in fresh walrissa the wind Were, they will again san on their destination. Purrs:eon-Tn. Fat. rer.....Arreeed his Majesty's ship Meropr, from a eruize. Sailed his Majesty's. ship Albicore, 441 Dropt down to St. Helen's, his Majesty'sabip Clarinda, *a ff:: , sail to-morrow, with the fleet for the Mt Liken-Incur). . TORIAT, Frs. 15..--Revived List evening after post,^the trans- port Pom o na marked': S. Captain Randell, from c.if 'Yip, with eats the Paned emmly st his Majesty's iship Championen fat nth stir. is a heavy gale at W.S. W. and as oth lost. ,spoke the transport Samuel and Sarah of London, (No, 299.) from LitLQr, bound to Oporto, but owing .o. the violent plee . S. tuns forced to go to Vigo, Which she left on the 6th instant; tee French being there, all the English vessels hadkft the port. Zee Pomona remains with the Channel Beet, under command of Ad- miral GA Natio ; also the letter of marq ue _ Phoenix , Capta;t: STZWART, from London for Gibraltar.— Wind W. S. W. The Chesterfield, Mudge, from Live4oo% for hnist...a ; C : George transport, from Vigo ; and the Ant, narigstet,:fram.Lai . don, for Cadiz, bare put into Kinsale. The Rebecca, Williams, from Waterford, is on shore on the South - Bull, Dublin, Coax MARkrr, MAPZI-LANI, Flo. IT.—There is an ertretne short supply of Wheat to-day, and sales then dime orally *tin: currency. here it likewise at ort supplies of Barley and Malt, and few Whim Pets, each 0( which are rather dearer. Foarce any ga small Old Beans, which are dearer, ahusailtht. to TS. per qu meet There are likewise short supplies of Oats, and In ti's ar.icle laa peices *re fully nllipottod...filour withoW at'OL .4 Th b agn t Yesterday at Heeissiski.etistea, eats, the Right Hon 5.: Arthur Paset, l lLi . atal:7Ye j iLidy:attlgu ); 2 rant , amense deisaktees efr LONDON . PolinSid sad Published - „0 1 " 1 ". Ott h wigs. A t nei 1.16"Y.1114 a riTt • •