Star. — London, England, 1816-03-07 00:00:00

• . - HODS! OF LORDS Mtr CH ft. r P.IRLIAMENTeiRT PROCEALINGL Counsel were 7 1;ar.1 fns th. AT.pellaut in the cram appeal of . 41 iStarlipole v. Ssockpele " Percher hearing to take place oo The Pad of WAI.DEGit AVF took the oaths and his seat. A Peti-fm was prevented in the Sr-as cause of " Fullerton ilstd lkfnkav st. Dal.ymple Hamilton. Bart." against certakn In terlocutors -f the flour- n. Session ; and for the lodgment of an Appeal. And a Cnion: , . Peition was presented from Sir H. D. Es t nilton. against :shove beire received, on the ground of In eampe•ency. Both the' Pr.:riot's were reeved to the consi deration of the Aireil Committee Mr. 'GUNS° N. from the Irish 4 leeretarf of State's Office. re. Slanted at the Isar Accounts of the Proceeds of the Public Income, Old the Corsolidated Fund of Ireland, with other subordinate tar ern pnt 4, which were tuaiered to Ikon the table. The Bank Loan Bill passed thrones a C0,1131;t• re of the whole /louse, and was rep , .rtvel r.-.thou' any amendment. The Private Bills upon the table were. respectively forwarded. Adjourned till to-morrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Shop-liftingßill went tbrm.gh a Committee. arer some enervation. between Sir S. Roust LY and h Ir. 1.0 cKII A ay. Re port to-morrow. The Committee on the Conventiln with America was post poned to this day se i nnii;ht. Mr. Jon N son .presented die financial Accounts of Ireland.— Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. lluoason, from the Customs and Excise, presented an Account of the number of Quarters of Bailey rule into Malt during the last year.—Orderel to lie on the table. Sir W. Sit WART presented a Petition from Wigton, praying for relief from the distreises under which the agriculturer la boured, particularly from the heavy taxes which affected the farmers, such as the Malt Duty, kc.—Read, and ordered to lie in the table. PROPERTY TAX. _ - - - _ Mr. HARVEY presented a Petition from the Ale house-keepers and Publicans of Norwich, praying re lief from the Excise Act of last SesEion ; but they did not wish - such Act to be continued and the Pro perty fax abandoned, because the latter was on those who were better able to pay, and because the licence duties were severe. As to the Property Tax, the Honourable Member said, he might approve of the measure if it were made a Real Property, not an In come Tax ; but as to the pledge of Parliament, the whole nation did suppose, that the Tax was to be abandoned at the conclusion of the war. If such Opinion were erroneous, it was an error that pervaded the whole i.atiou ; and under such circumstances, as w.ts the general Asservation, he thought the feeling of the coantry ought to be attended to.—(lltar.)-- 1-1: h0..1 I nit give any pledge to vote against the Prt.perty ras—he should wait to hear the modifica tinus +•t the Chancellor of the Exchequer—hut with out it was made a Property Tax only, with favoura ble modifications. he should not support the Bide— Read, And ordttld to lie on the table. Mr. IitEI'HUEN presented a Petition from the Airmen ot Laycock, Wiltshire, against the Property Tax in particular, the Poitioneri thinking in cnm. mon with the rest of his Majesty's subjects, that Par liament was pledged to Abandon the Tax at the end of he war. Read, and qrdered to lie on the table. S,r W. GEARY presented a Petition from Chat. ham, c niched in language. The Honourable Baronet took the occasion to observe that he could nu longer support a measure which the neeessitiessof the war alone authorised. When he supported it t' - ere was heavy war, and it would have been impossible to raise the .:mount by Loan, except under the greatest ; but as the necessities of that crisis no longer existed, he should do all in his power to resist the coutinudrum ot the Property Tax—(Hear).—. Read, and ord..red to lie on the table. Sir C. POOLE presented a Petition from Ply mouth, also against the Property Tax. Read, and ordt red to lie oat the table. Mr. SULLIVAN presented a Petition from Marl borough against the Property Tax ; the petitioners viewing it as a war measure only. Read, and or dered to lie on the table. Sir G. CLARKE presented a Petition from Mid- Lothian against the Property Tax. Mr. HORNER bore testimony to the respectabi lity of the petitioners, and was assured that they really laboured under great distress. Sir G. CLARKE admitted the correctness of this representation, but deemed it right to add, that from the best consid:vati:.n which he had been enabled to give to the sul ject, he was of opinion that the Tax ought to be continued ; that it was the best resource which could be resorted to under the existing neces sities of the country. Read, and ordered to lie on the table. Mt. LAMBTONI ;resented a Petition from Dur ham. He stated that the Petition was from those called clamorous by the /sl,ble Lord (Castlereagh), and being in amo economical mood, and evincing an ignormit impatience of the bord,ns of taxation, they lotaibly prayed a diseontinnance of the Pro. pertyTax.—(Hear, hear). — Read, and ordered to lie On the Table. Lord W. RUSSELL presented a Petition from Bratird :against the renewal of the Property Tax in any form.--Read, and ordered to lie on the Table. Gi•Heral FERGIR;ON presented a Petition from the toe n ol Dysaat agaiiist the Property Tax, as at on e in:politic and • •ppressive. Read, and ordered So 1;e on the T.tlNle. Mr. W. ELIA° IT ,wesented a Petition front Pe. fitrborlugh against the Property Tux. Read, and *rdeted to lie Po the Table. Mr. CALCRAF 1' presented a Petition from IVarrh:►m. with a similar prayer. Read, and order ed i o lie on .he Tehle. Lord NUGEN r pres.:nted a Petition from Ayles bury against the Property Tax, and setting forth other grit v.,,ices. • His Lordship stated, that he en tirely agreed in the principle of his Constituents' Pe. titian, as well AR its prayer ; with them, he held that i t v:45 most titjUSti unconstitutional, and inquisitor re l; ar.d that,ll , An the large military establishm e nts noav proposed to be retained, there wonld be no oc casion for the Income and Property Tax. Read, and ordered to lie on the Table. Lord NUGINT presented another Petition from the same part of the country, namely, the parish of Aston-Abbots, against the Property and Income Tax, and the Pe..ce Establishment. Read, and or dered to lie on the Table._ _ . Sir G. HEAIIICOTE presented a Petition from Farmers, Graziers, atc. in the county of Rutland, complaining gentrAlly of Agricultural distress, And praying relief from heavy taxation. He attributed the late high prices of corn to the great issues of muney—issues Which had now necessarily been cur tailed, thereby occattoning much of the distresses experienced by fa:mem Ihese distresses would be • • aggravatei by eganinnid beai* motion; tarred% I 'only reggired..tn keep up lgrge .milLtary establish ments, which; however improper they might he, he did not agree uith_the Petitioners, proceeded from deliberate design to overthrow the Constitution. He likewise condemned the lacguage of a Noble Lord (Caitlereaglt) on a former evening, it tending nor onliko characterise Anise who presented Petitions as factious and seditious, but to destroy petitioning altogether. Mr. SWAN said this Petition resulted from a few Landholders, not from a County Meetirg, and that signatures were obtained by a belief that it was to obtain relief from all taxation. „ Mr. FINLAY observed, that he could not con ceive why the Government should desire to keep up the funds, which was the assigned reason for not re sorting to a loan, when it was the interest of Glvern ment that they should be low, that the National Debt might be more easily paid off. He thought it would be more advisable to raise ar6,000,000 by loan, rather than by a Tax on Property. Sir C. MQNCK said, the Petition did not purport to come froela-Thei, County—it was stated to be the Petition only of the undersigned persons. ' Sir G. NOEL thought it was the duty of the House to receive the Petition, although it might not come from the County. They had only to resist, What was very foolish or improperly obtained.— The Petition did not particularly name the Pro perty Tax; but he thought, at all events, that con siderable modification of the Tax was absolutely necessary. Lord RANCLIFFE said, there might be some very cogent reason for this Petition not having re sulted from a County Meeting, as in many instances the most abominable influence had been exerted to prevent meetings for the purpose of voting Petitions against thd Prepetty Tax. Stich was the fact in the case of the Mayor of Leicester, he having refused to call a Meeting upon a Requi,ition, kecause-it de sired the Meeting for the purpose of voting a Peti tion against the Tax; but the difficulty as to the, motive which induced this proceeding might be solved, when he stated that such Mayor was the Re ceiver for the County. (Hear, /rear). Mr. DICKEPON, to shew the severity of the existing mode of levying the Tax, instanced the case of a Mr. Taylor, who stated by letter to the Commissi .ners of Taxes, his inability to pay the Tax at the time desired, requesting suspension of the Exclumner process with which he was threatened air 1:1.: Commissioners he was referred to the C cellor of the Exchequer, who, after answering one letter, referred Mr. Taylor back to the Commis sioners. The Commissioners replied, that they did not feel authorised by Of. Act of Parliament to grant the relief prayed for. He then applied to the Chan cellor of the Exchequer, who referred him to the Commissioners of the Taxes..He wrote a second time to the Right Hon. Gentleman, from whom no farther answer had been received. The CHANCELLOR. cf the EXCHEQUER stated, in justification of the Commissioners, who had always fulfilled their duty with impartialay anJ justice, that the circumstances described by the tio. nourable person, respecting the estate, did not come within the provisions of the Act. The floe. Gm deman had then, a second time, applied to him, de siring further i nformation ; to this, he confessed Le had not thought himself bound to answer, as first letter had appeared in a morning paper. He should now advert to what the Honourable Nl;:mter for Glasgow had stated respecting the Prolrerty Tax. That Honourable Gentleman had taken rather a narrow view of the origin of that. tax. It was ant in order to raise loans on better terms, that Mr. Pitt, Lord Sidmouth, and Lord Lansdowne bad rr c‘;rn mended the adoption of that measure, but because they thought that the accumulation of debt from re. peated loans, would, at last, wear out the resources of the country, and they wished to make the cottony provide yearly for its own expenditure. Had n. , t 'that measure been carried into execution, the 170 millions which it had produced in the course of the war, would be united to the public debt, and an ad-1 ditional permanent taxation of eight or ten millions would be imposed on the nation. Before the Sinking Fund,and the Property Tax, all the taxes had no li mitations. But how did the country nand now, compared with the period of the former peace ! Even at this moment the Consolidated Fund yielded a larger surplus than it possessed when the Commit. tee of 1791 had made their Report. We had then a Sinking Fund of one million only. We had now one of £2,600,000, and another improving Sinking Fund of eleven millions. Yet the House were told that the prosperity of the country was in its decay I Of that and of tuturity, he did not pretend to know any thing, but he was only certain that up to the 2d of March, there had been no diminution of the public revenue. He was also of opinion, that of all imposts, that which had the least tendency to decrease the value of the circulating medium, was the P re -I perty Tax. Mr. BABINGTON vindicated the Mayor elf Lei cester from the charge brought against him. He had consulted with his brother Magistrates, before he had refused the first requisition presented to him, and the ground on which he had- refused it was, that it re quired a Meeting to condemn, not to investigate the measure. He had replied, that he felt it inconsistent with his public duty to call a Meeting to embody the feelings of one clan of men only. Another requisi tion, properly worded, had then been sent to that very Mayor, who had then callei a Meeting, and the subject had been discussed. He thought it would be better for Gentlemen if they did not canvass the con duct of person, in the country, without first inquiring into the correctness of reports, and the reality of facts. Mr. BROUGHAM, notwithstanding the expla. nation gives by his Hon. Friend, thought that the objection made by the Mayor to the first requisition, was rather a sort of special pleading, to delay, if not to defeat, the object. He should allude to another case, not uesimilar. It had taken place in a City, which, though it contained upwards of 100,000 Wu. bitants, had no representative in that House. Ile meant the City of Manchester. A requisition, -*net' by one hundred of the most respectable inhabitants of that place, had been presented to the Borough• Reeves, who had delayed their answer till a counter. requisition was set about. They then stated, that having received two contradictory requisitions, al though they did not say by whom the last was signed, they were of !pinion that it iyaa not proper to call • ee any. Meetm whateiveve TI:os was One of the Ittnst considerable cities i$ the kingdom prevented from ex pressing its rlsinion tl:e Property Tax. Lord CASTLEREAGH pretested agAinst the system Adopted . by the Honourable Gentleman, to canvass the conduct of persons in lie country on slight havegrnu h ncl e s e . n ,T m he o c ct let ~tretiitt:is i i rt i t y e i v d e unainlg. u hadold f iv not an lion. Mienber been fin uwately possessed of w such information as proved the charges unfounded. It would be a caution to the House not to give car to the Hon. Gentleman. (fir hear, from the Ofrpo ;Woe) If the system of running down individuals in this !wiener teas adepted, it would introduce an idea in the minds of the peoPle, that Parliament was net disposed to receive the Petitions ef the subject welt, the respect to which they were entitled. He should now advert to whet had taken place at an earlier stage of tile di bate. His Wet Hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer ha, last night stated the principle of the modifications which be should pro pose to the Property Tax, to relieve the people.— . (Hear, hear, and a laugh on the Ono:idea. site.)---Hue reelly knew of welting so ill received on the other 'side die of pt i l tle hl H ie: ens ( e ik a a s the propose l of any iedulgence to with regret every tbi e .:l /1,- , e v e hi .2 h They seemed to view tonled to lighten the , Tax. (Hear, hear!) He did sot coesider it important for the winding up tit the expenes of the war, th.tt the payments under the Property Tex shouli be meee during the two yens that the impost was to be rttaia. ed. Three, four, or eviet five ye ua might be allowed for that purpose, witlieut any inconvenience to the public service, as Exchequer bilis might . be issued in be met by the produce of the Tax us tt should be collected. Much relief would be extended to the 40- j:•cr in this manner, os w4l as le. some regulation in the issue of Exclettilior Peocessi... He thouilit it fis duty to apprise the Gerek-nen opposite of any iru portant fact on which he intended to argue when Cie discussion on the Property 'l'a should cemtnence, that they might look at it and prepare any arcutnent their ingenuity might sieeeest to contravert it. Tbe part of the question to which this fact would apply, was that which had been assuated with so much ener gy by a Right lion.Gentlenotn opposite, that to con tinue the Property Tax in peace, would be to commit a breach of peblic faith, even if it were to stud up the expenses of the war. He would shew that in at tempting to clamour down de; tax, that Him. Gen tleman had only deprecated the conduct of his own friends. He had thus • 'limn-end against his pellticel friends, and given him (Lore C.) an advent ege that he did not seek. He should now proceed to estanlish the fact, that in peeing and eagmenting the Tax on Property as a Weir Tax, the Gentlemen oppesiiehad not conceived a:emit:lves piecioded in g0 , :.4 faith to continue it in time of peace. In the 'Faihl. - B. 2J of the Plan of Finance, brought forward by the Chan cellor of the. Exchequer under the Administration of Lord Grenville, it would be sera that Minister pro ceeiled on the suppreltion that the country might be carried thrcu',h then Ivor at aa expenditure of : - ;2 lions per annum. The calettlaeoit was in itself so far wrong, that since that period the expenditure of the country had net hi-el under 52 millions. The loans which would be it .cessioy eore ter be ntertgaeed on t e W.e• Taxel ; rut Ito the Pl ,, perty Tax alooe.-1 (Near, 00oritim). but on the war t Trey were Cren estimated At nearly tweety millions, their amount, being £19,800,000. Suppos ing that system had been adopted, and the y arly ex- 1 p ;iittire to have been 32 millions, the whole of the %Vat . 'l'rzc;, includin3 the Property Tax, would have ire ex:iatisted and mortgaged in the year 1619 ?' as the expenditure hid been annually 52 instead of tinny-two tae whole of those taxes would have been mortgaged in 1815. (Hear!) Th.., Chem:a im of the Exchequer of the day had certainly said, and if the war lasted only seven years, the Property Tax would not be mortgaged; but that was not saying it should not in case the war should last, and in fact it had lasfe.l longer. On the contrary, it , must then have been tnortgaged with the rest, and by this very plan the Noble Lord (the present Mar.' quis of Lansilown) recognised that although the Act was to expire wen the war, yet if the war con tinued more than seven years, it must share the fate of the other taxes. This should be discussed on a future occasion —(!/ear, hear, from the Opposition ) He wished the House to go to the bottom of it. (11:ar, hear.) Had that Noble Lord's plan been adopted, when in 1819 all the war taxes and the Property Tax should have keen absorbed by mortgage, the country would have remained WitlinUt Wiy resource but the surplus of the Consolidated Fund. Now, it not only enjoyed the surplus of that Fund in an improved state, but it had a revenue of six millions out of those very war taxes 'Lae would have been absorbed by the measure. He would argue that never had a princi .ple been more solemnly recognized than that all war taxes, including the Property Tax, would be mort gaged, and tl.at there was no parliamentary incapa city to effect that object. MroW. WYNNE was surprised at the idea diet tbc Property 'l'ax was to have been mortgaged. He almost doubted hi s he ar i ng , b ut b e should refer to the tables, and shew how unfounded was the state ment of the Noble Lord. It would be . found on those tables that the conclusion was, that there " would be no case so trefAvoorable as not to admit' that the people should be relieved from the Property Tax, within the first year after the conclusion of a war."—(llear, hear, from the Opposition.) In order, to prevent the possibility of the Tax not being aban doned, the denomination of the taxes to be mort gaged was changed from that of war taxes to the duties on Excise and Customs— (Haar, hear.) After this it was most unfair to impute incousistency to the Gentlemen who had supported that plan, for not supporting the revival of the measure in time of peace. He had voted for the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act, a measure which he considered justified only by the necessity of thd'case. But be. cause he had done it when that:necessity existed, would he be i r onshtent if he refused his assent, to it ts in t sdrahodoef;ef thetoCti ohi f a l re i p t e tt A ari a Loms c N v a C n : ris E tdwayo L st. in L ‘intal o ,ieis kihirn: o eot f s iwpoffi t epl h eeci n e tdoiegno ep e X -e oota e fifcl et H ei heu E ce.oat Q rns:Nt U ilots E htbat aa k el e Lor) g ion f t it was a question of discretion and expediency. He then react from the tables an . account of the financial system uthFettnupd would rope bstd,ebeywahhii hed a through ich it appearedroughthe ure that a . • raeon of which the puhDe would he rtli veil from•neilrly the wil•de of t h e hor: r t ; sir-uld it have been pledged a.ter seven ykau and from the r-ma'nJer in a • Mr. PONSONBY chF.?tv:d, that the whol e a , ruent of the Noble Lord had been to prove, that . i:, the system prepared in 18x,7, .son : r r t i m „ I to .. Property Tar might have beentn. , rtgi••e.l in time war, but he forgot that the paper slid, that i 4, case, however unfavolti!.le, v. is T it t rem • heyond the time fired in the Act. Evil) alo h a: part of it hive been mr)rtgiged, Cis v have been redeemed during the first year. Th e N iki . Lord had !wen pleased to sir th at ht. sonhy) had endeavoured to disiinguish hitsn e h h is friends me this snhjrct--that he had n- ettat. tempted. Ht 11.1 d only Said that he had vote on this Tax. Nevi::. had less been said is d House far the purposed pi:runnel ti i1 " 1 1 41 Nth .' him ; and he never -should rise so high i n _Y. opinion, that of hi. flit:DJ, and of t h e ulfa Ma when he should incur the censur e of the N% r e Ide olgaby.c repcated once mote, Oat the Legislati re - i7 said the Property 'rise should n t continue 6, than six months after the signittire of em i r Treaty of Peace. The Nohl e Lo r d mi g h t p ut Convructi on upon the', but what was the Coaltrt h : do ? Was she to take the meaning f r o m t h e watch, the Act of Parliament, - or from .my can riati " which the Nohl.- Lord 'night put epon thee)? -4 Mr. DA RING said, that suppo.ing the Na t i derj had proved all (bat he had advanced, it )tati,, 3 come to this, that a plan had been submettalict: liatnent, whelher good or bad e which ease c..witry sonnt years of War WitiVrit t!:, lax at all. That was mnre VI in th e ); Lo r d tn d hi s code-vitt!, had showed a •.h.in ,;ae IP.AUS 1.1C4C. bad been so miraenlously•caachai. lor, by the statement which they h a d nude to tut it appeared that in two y ears theeabs. would have reached the end of . her retou rei , - Z dint alindLd t o th e cunning dev i ce of the a nstet/ A tilt Exchequer, in wiping oif the wo r d s « no longer" Iran the Act, a v:ce whi c h htd breii ca t . vassed at a meeting which he had .:titlicird tint morning, in a manner whit!) Le shAntl not with ti e Right tlon&arable Genth•rnan to hive heard. 'l' at omission. proved, that Le intended t• weds al much as p-ssible, the pledge existing betee rn p a , liament and the pe,,pie. He then defended tbess , of inquiring into the co iduct r,f persons in the who opposed she di: p:,sition of the people to p,t, 4 . He reproved the plan ul partial concessinat w i le by Ministers, as n•:joist to the whole of the ssf ai , from the Tr v. W.th ali those exceptions t h e would not produce tive millions annually. I posing all the diffsculties should begot ov er , million.s should be pmduced s _ they would hr fes-.1 on pubic credit, and it would be mon to relinquish the Tax altogether, than united voice of the c!..nntry. The relici country from this rahnoxicas -iarthen woe charge of only £60000:L This would to get rid of ail this question of publit charge would prosije a fund for the rt the ten millions ; and he pat it to:he Ht this SUM CO ild at all affect thepnhlic trot surplizing that Ministvrs, with this Cieir eyes, should parse :et lit th.-ir syste nfa only the landed interest to whom the is • cut, but the commercial and trading intai suffering, and the one required tdielequalli as the other. Mr. LYTTLErou contended th ct of Lord Grenville, as alluded to by tte (Lord Castlereagh) had no beease g tion. The tendency of the speeches 4 feld was ungenerously to dtvrrt the from the main quevi,..n. Et'ell the imhi he spoke of as given to Ger tternen on Is House, was equally irrelevaie, asid was the artifices to throw an unflaiided sill It such arguments were admitted, wht come ot the uuqiiestiunable right of the inquire into pitblic grievances, particularli taxation ? Tee Noble Lord's manner highly disrespectful to the House, or else degree ot levity about him, equally sylech ought to be equally resented by There could be no question, that it Tax had not been imposed, there woulu greater proportion of wealth in our poci therefore protested against the argument: Honourable Gentleman (the Coancel,ur chequer), who vcould tint', it he pertins sisted iu the measure, that it wueld to ; sources ot tinan:e, of the most . `queue to every class ut community. wined that the cetisme-eitil classes of toe fered almost as meet a: the aglittliite received a fetter firma an inhabitant ot the sulject of petition, trona eflitch he c, the Hiette, that that city was sufferiel from distress as any other lent of the Its entreated Ministers, on re whole; to ; rassitz the Property Tax :or seine weeks they might be accueinted with tile real I country. The people of the city a' cow tester had been deluded by the idtea th; would have had too much consideration a measure; but being disaprointed is Bons, they were about tto send up al; would explain their ' full sentiment& with entrearin a farther delay. Lord CATLEREAGII denied that undervalued the exei tions a the essietry ever shelved levity it was only in venue upon the, conduct of the Gentiernea was the only course he could pursue, as' of meeting the reproaches is al:icb flu much in the habit of indulging. Lord MILTON replied to the elerva 'Noble Lord (Castlereagh), and d,ft..,Je. , pie acted on by the late iltdminisnatien. Commissioners onder the fioretty Tax stated by the Right Honourable Golden. Leer agents, yet it the Tax were continue d ' not be likely to have the Assistance of per descriptioo. He had authority to say, Gentlemen wea e Commissioners mkt Act, had declared Vide determination or der the new 13i11, if it should be eettied• Mi. MA 2 RYAT declare,: his fizeJ that the Property Tax ought not, omio circumstances of the county, t 4 be cunt( T.,x ought to be kept as a sort aline uf bet wi in an ciy count War tl c ppK. Mr. 'icon 5 : 1" h' VS Ez • agrieuit tioPPlie 3 die, H by r. . n uance the coin ste ad of r rt l bt es ism C is dot) seder its :sisters r4i pore beh Country pie, bad !) t ies. TI .4 skit this I Gentlem ii pisers in t like Gent li Property 1 4111 enorrna was oblige] ars e after al whether it from this oi able to per% and unnecei won.ai with 'a receive the cc of pc never ported that tang Day, a who was Lit 'to send Ited to g unabl dote to pr. 1 . o f ‘4. Mini: t 0 m the mcs j . !re .a uel Ger did 11 : 4 0 . de 1 " Ai whether it i r ,. -- .“--ceePby from this ni -- " rul • }h able to pert, wads "Ito pon and r u l i v i o nec n..:: hid bee„ c.a. Bay with !ii :Litliclrd 0,4 t b e en receive I " wt wish th e terms the cc ' btu& Taa l dance of pc t we 'llee. a c ould never ,7, °eel Pa. ported that r 6 'heifers tang Bay, a 'milieu:eta% wbn was vat , le to Pet t i ca , i, him to send %,:csot adipid obliged to g if the snido s being unabl , ti(xts . the 14 dote to pn •s Hy. Lase ? people of w over, end to k plore Mini: t ild here no d but every (II core prefei,o t • Sir GIL: I 41 )PPoieti.e means by w rliceing Of lig never would ititiateofrtitaaitligitehdagt oold reqgl% a sure. Id be the trq Mr. SW.I 'Tic faith; tins hundred p... tedemptiad after which House whether It got signal redit ? Lea the Property this fict flee Sir GILB stem. lot:: had represen e bait wo lati of the count reft.e Masa min parts of 13ally as Ilia. Mr.LOCI ving of a me it the ceded species of pn he NiNe. , lod total elevatio ipra tw lati, his property 1 of the Sqik distresses whi e last hc ai4 property of t !tilgencealn venture to SS: 114 Mt oi . which it coul , as abider , defended a m itsr upon Oa might by the hat w•rulif is merchants ha, the Hoy to while it had f cu u r l y .j . , z ,i able to hear ii ter was either peat flies bro isratetit;iriienei*, lie that rasa Goes in its tra o ff ent e,„ a d Sieving the to y the coot* would be mcs t the rrupr !mild remain ?id have bees The I'etitio to lie on the t n i: P lu t e s: c c o to ir 4 l .l l ll til efty kt , ,' tatheeMsrttWe. No bility, E 814 .inacionsly pa. of FAUX, exp t:ry op all , - Tax w ould i Corioui .. stances. The I ) . H e , • econo my WOW 1 , 3 L He ' ' The' Petitios Wiarcestetot Ike that it lie couklacia+S Mr. LON( ~,z as of' Sher hating g, kttigt l 4l 111 be was of the i 11 i , bil 4;ll tr . lialThe l Y I that : 1 / 4 ; loa;ct,Il T! greatest inj 11 stated Anhough he t aoontyd W. °Pinion diffe re e.___lffttioni yet h that Sig etierience, an lie cunt Lem conduct o "pose the clue! rayt Ir ad hiJ obt the J i Use Exchequer) tenting ure, but 11 opp ),lte; prejudi 6 use belt ..' . ,as to ret they Woe " ' Dee, under , tconld never E •vations el'. • tin much c Jed th e 1 1. e. . a War Ta r , 1. '11,00: '' - felt it du e t w...:::, A ''' he had fort lenim), v t - irences that ti yeti, b e .. k , and 1 i , erral is ' h ir e it Hon. G et that le" 1 but if he did der the ' . • find him not toad • little in I. • felin e s. opal ; o piDise ' tie h. l .d ' e rg's( that th e c aiatied. - the great I ' re # whir.h •