Star. — London, England, 1816-11-22 00:00:00

. - 777 ortienst, to the Jule of law, you are_not permitted me Lord:Copt RAY a f --" There is much more to statis but it is s.. connected with the facts of Davidson's 'ease, that no separation can be effected. I shall leave you; therefore, to pronounce your lodgment, without stain:, my case. The series of injuries, inhumanities, and injustice, which I have received from the Bench, from perjured• w:tnesses" Mr, Justice AntiyrT" You are not entitled here to abuse the Bench, and to accuse persons who have been examined on oath. The Court is ready to pay all attention to ariy eircumso.nces relating to the charge of which the Jury have found you guilty. yo any observations of that kind the Court will attend, and will glove them all due consideration." Lord Comittapx—" Your bird,hi pi are aware that I li‘vauaecl every endeavour to obtain an investiga. this of 'my ease.. You know, when I came to this - Cert. that 1 war refused a new trial, under the pre. 'glee of it rule of . Court. I was ref Used the privilege iOf putting n alificiavits, because the persons who made them were called on trial; but that privilege had since been all owed in Another case." Mr. Justice Bracer That is not the fact; and I sin bound to state it, because I know what has been tote conduct of the Court. I will therefore ex plain the business. Where a party comes to move fer_ a new trial, he is not entitled to make use of the affidavits of persons who had been called as witnesses, of to use the affidavits of those who might have been Where. a party comes to receive the sentence of the COurt, it is competent to receive the affidavits of persons who had.heen, or might have been, exa mined at the trial, in mitigation or aggravation of punishment. The mistake arises from persons, not . conversant with the practice of the Court, not under , ttanding the distinction between one case and the other, hazarding an opinion on this point. I have pointed out the distinction. It is the practice of every dal to receive, in mitigation or aggravation of punish ment, the affidavits of persons who were, or might have been, eaatiained at the trial:. on the other hand, it is the practice, not of modern times, that, when moving for a new trial, you cannot make use of the affidavits of such persons." Lord COCURAWIL—•I6 I have only again. to say to TsuiLiArdshkp, that 1 consider the matte in my ad. &est relevant to my case. .You hare decided other- V9e. and I regret that 1 cannot lay it before you. I do not wish to enter into a verbal statement, whidit isagla he misrepresented. Words might, in that case, be prat recto my mouth, And afterwards argued against. Therefore I must submit to whatever decision your Lordships cent: to, instructed as your Lordships' Minds appear to be on that which you have not heard." . oe. Justice HOLROYD" Your Lordship must nosierstaod, that we are ready to hear . any thing reit- Yelps If you, can shew that the matter you have alto. • deco is in any degree relevant, we shall be most at. Motive to it. BUJ it you cannot show, that, die opi. nionstated . must be obeyed.. In the discharge of our duty to your Lordship, we must proceed as we Mean - to do - to all others hereafter—and were we to' miter you to proceed, others might also introduce miner totally irrelevant, which could not answer the judginect of the law, its its due and proper course." Lord Cacti haat Your Lordships must be aware that I have no other means of :hewing the relevancy *talon matter I hold in my hand than by reading it to the Conn." • Ur. Justice BATLLPY, after a short pause, desired Mr. Istattawer to proceed. Mr. iVIAKILYAT said, that in praying the judgment of the Court on the defendant in this case he begged to state, that it was not asked with any degree of asperity by the prosecutor, notwithstanding what had been said on the trial. But their Lordships could not wonder, after the slander so widely diffused, and by the inatrumentality of the defendant himself (he lia!ring handed over his speech• to a Newspaper Re porter that it might appear in print) that the Marshal qt the King's Bench should look forward for an op. portunity of Wily stating his conduct, in order that the recommendation of the Jury, which was produced by the false -assertions contained in that speech, should be viewed by the Court in its proper light.-- On the occasion. to which lie alluded, the defendant went into a det4il of all the Marshal was supposed to have done, without adducing a ny proof whatever. It was an address dr6wn up in the closet, and intended to be circulated. widely abroad. It was published in every form—not only by the 'Reporter to whom it. wis delivered, but in the shape of a pamphlet. The Marshal therefore looked forward to the present day as the period when he could justify his conduct, and clear his character—hoping that se should not be found to have misconducted himself in the manner represented by the defendant at the trial. What were the misrepresentationi on the trial that produced the reccmmendation of the Jury ? So far as questions were or could be asked of the witnesses, those ;nitre - presentaiions were negatived. But the defendant lead an cpportnnity of making a speech, which he determined to do without cling evidence; and by this means he could advance what calumnies he ph-aged, Without the fear of their being corrected at she t ;rne • kle thus reddered it necessary for the Ka dial to come forward on the present day, town. tradict his statements. Lord Cuohfane was brought up to receive the iudgment. •of the Court for an of fence much less serious now t h an it fianser:y was ; for, by the Common Law, even an escape from the stocks, or, from the custody of a trustable, was liable an the peoelty that attached to the commission of to. lofty.. Iq this case, the defendant slfas committed to t!le custody of t i let.blarsbal, and remained . charged with .a fine of £RIOO, for.wlsich most unquestionably the prosecutor would have been lEchle,, as io other es p k pe, if the defendant hull not .been r e. taker?. He was alto committed to remain in the pri son of the. King's Bench ' , for a period of twelve mont h s , of which between three and four were tinetpired, at the time of the escape. An escape toott pla te , the. *Omer of which their Lordships would sea the ati a olsal t was ignorant of up ! to the piesent day. When the escape was:effected, the Marshal offered a very considerable reward for the.. appieheusioo of the &tenable(' which he had paid, Two hundred gujiwaX. were given.to awe individual, and one hundred swipe* mos divided amooptiOWll. I.li. It , WAS. .allege 4 .4340 deka:tot at 'ma Welk that the Marshal, wo, willing 10 compromise the be. suv•is with hiin—aed that bit *dial/bin socket an. _ . . . . . . .. : z.".• 'stiuctions to hire* owls to' km thi t of:Lord Gillian: iretheillitsf bf &Mr** 0. II c l e tni es o re . Th e hitalt s hal hgf, 3l losizaer,' in unitgligps f cat:terase, stied that he hatl4o 4 s tilltin tilt. 111 , 1 sttuctlans of "any person Whar s eater-:O at his conesic had been dictated by his own judg As to ,the allegation that a negociatien hid beenentled into for the return of the defendant, every OR. of thA statement was'distinctly denied by . the Morelia'. He' was certainly desirous ' ting back his prisoner— and thought that the„ . dish` Rohe returned, without coercion : the less dist,' ul it would be to himself. But he had no idea whatever of foregoing the prose. eution. Distinct overtures were made to the Marshal when he was preferring his bill before the Grand Jury, to stop the proceeding, by the clerk of Mr. )ray, his Lordship's solicitor, but he refused to see the defen dant, because he felt it to be his duty to the public to Igo on with the prosecution. His motives were three fold—first, to deter others from acting in the same way—neat, he wished to prevent such an escape in future, by discovering the means by which it was effected, and he hoped souse evidence on that point would cone out on the trial—and lastly, he was anxious to do away the idea of any connivance on his part. He never held on: to any person the slightest hope that the prosecution would be relaxed. The next thing alleged againsothe Marshal was, that when the defendant was brought back lie was placed in the strong room.' On this, point the affidavit of the Marshal was perfectly satisfactory. There was, he said, no place in the prison stronger than that from which the defendant had escaped, except the_ two strong looms, and the most convenient of these (that which was boarded) was selected for his Lordship's reception. The detendrint stated, on his trial, that he was confined in a pestilential dungeon for 26 days —but he did not state that the Marshal was anxious to place him in a better situation as soon as he cupid with safety tohimselt. The Learned Gentleman took a review of the conduct which the Marshal exercised towards Lord Cochrane, as disclosed in his affidavit, contending that he had not exceeded the bounds of his duty, but had only exercised a proper degree of vigilance and caution in securing his prisoner. —On the 13th of March, the Marshal, for the first time, heard of Lord Cochrane's indisposition, and he immediatelysent Mr. Saumarez, the Gentleman who attended his own family, to his Lordship. On that day, his Lordship received a certificate, which was nut shown to the Marshal, until his removal from the `strong-room took place. Instead of spewing the ceititicate signed by Drs. Buchan and Saumarez to the Marshal, he took the circuitous route of sending it to the Secretar y of State's Office—and then com plained of the Marshal for not attending to that of which he knew nothing. On the 15th of March, it was intimated to the Marshal that, it Lord Cochrane was not removed, ill consequences would result to his health. After consulting a few minutes, and en deavouring to procure security for the fine of dll,OOO from Lord Cochrane, in order, should his Lordship again escape, that he might be indemnified, he con sented, at his own risk, to remove him to a place which he did not think secure. Than such was his' feeling appeared evident—for, after the Defendant was removed, the Marshal employed additional watchmen, who were discontinued when he was libe rated. What inhumanity, what wantonness, what torture was the Marshal then guilty of ? All.that had been alleged at the trial was answered with the utmost cif cumstantialit7. His Lordship asserted, that he broke out of prison for a laudable purpose.— He did not know what that laudable purpose was. Certainly he found his way, some time after, to tis seat in the House of Commons. Whether hilt Lord. ship's purpose was laudable, it was not for him to inquired but, undoubtedly, any priloncr making his escape, might advance the same excuse. He knew no circumstance to which the Noble Lnrd had alluded, to take away from the criminality of the act, that might not apply, in any particular instance, when the Prisoner chose to make his escape. Mr. Gunomr, un the same saute side, only wished to add one observation upon the good intentions of the Noble Lind in escaping : his design was stated to be, that he might outfid in his place in the House of Commons to complaio of injustice. This allegation was disproved in the first place by its own absurdity; for it his Lordship had postponed his complaint for nine months, he could without much injury to his cause have postponed it for twelve, when his sen tence would have expired. But it was equally clis-. proved by his. own conduct : though so anxious to escape to prefer his charge, and effecting his escape ou,the '7th or Sth of March, hi had never made his appearance in the House of Commons until the 21st of that month. It was fit drat those who nude such pretensions should make their conduct correspond with those pretensions. Mr. ADOLPHUS was retained far the prosecution, but declined addressing the Court. _ Mr. Justice Bayutv,,after consulting with.the other Judges for a few minutes, proceeded to deliver the judgment of the Court :—" Sir Thomas Cochrane, commonly called Lord Cochrane—You stead before the Court to receive its sentence in consequence of having been convicted of the offence of escapiog from the King's Bunch prison, while you were in custody 1 under a commitment from this Court. But to state the occasion which brings your Lordship here is suf ficient to satisfy every oispasvonate mini of the pro priety of the course which has been adopted in pre venting you from going into the irrelevant matter which you proposed tootle consideration:cat the Court. Whether a man of the name of Davidson Wai,or was not properly'acquitted, was a question which had no relation to the matter before the Court. You had been comMitted by sentence of this Court : of the fitness of that sentence it is not now out; *business to inquire. Of the present Meniberi of the COurt, I em the only one who concurred Mthat- sentence ; and I am, unfortunately,' also the may surviving Judge present, who joined in the (pillion delivered open the motion of a new trial. I then acted,' as I shall alwayi act, under the recollection that I was bound by the sacred obligation 91 an: oath.— Into that question it is not our' duty new tb pia.— The sentence having beets prottounced . for your his. ' prisonment, it was your Loriphip's•duty to acquiesce uti it;. arid to Obey the laws 001 that crittiiti* - L of Which, yen • lire a. 'Ant. Wf4eNieetoigl*Oe. /s**, 041 1 ' "Wet feelings, you had tits chbice , b,'W;felititit te! obi penishusearthe Court thought nicessiti to Whet. 1) , / eseastog . trom the plate of Our toeinettte, Ut s , you *itt only acted in de fi ance of the !turf of the realm as . 1 • • Ar tot. elf; you *seed the effi%'r 4 the Court, icilw.l.aa dine you were entru.ted, In a certain degree 4 hatferdvand you put him ado Oft tre:onsidaake expense. Vithat mig ht !nary in ' teitioneavflither hinocent or criminal , i tis impossible for us to,know : that passed in your own (Med, and , in yaitown mind only ; but in law there could he no t.justifiableeieuse.'• Them might have been eground ter mitigation, if before . that cant the hers tips of your impritoemeat had been increased, or if you had endtirtd undue severity by the misconduct of die in. dividnel to Whine custody you were confided : 'had that been tha:•Case, and had it been knows to any person besides yourself, you might have adduced evidence of it at the trial; but no witness was then brought -forward, either to attempt to prove a justifiable excuse or any thing in mitigation.— On this occasion also we have seen oo affidavits to that effect—nothing to skew misconduct hi those who had yea in charge, by undue and unusual severity, er by any increase of the hardships of imprisonment. Affidtvits have, i 'wryer, been handed in en the other side, by which it appears that as much indul gence had been sheen to you by the Marshal *as was 1 consistent with a due regard to his duties ; and even 1 atter tie period t f ) our return, you experienced as, much lenity anal con-,ideratain as the nature of the case would perto;t. At the trial that occurred, to which the C. urn is always glad to listen, and which, in passing sentence, it always keeps in view,-it Ap peared that, on being brought back to prison. rou . were confined iii the strong roam, and to a person of . your habits and condition, that certainly must have been an aggravation ot per confinement. It was not more than was necessafy, and was justified by your previous misconduct ; but it seems probable, from what occurred at th trial, that by it your health was in some degree impaired, and these cit. 1 cumstances induced the Jury to recommend your Lordship to the merciful consideration of the Court on the judgment to be pronounced upon your offence. It must always be a great gratification to those ap pointed to, administer justice, and to me individually' I am sure it is so, to be able to attend to this sug gestion; but we must at the same time look to future consequences, mid to the situation in which other persons are placed. It seems, that in cohsequence of your escape. a very large pecuniary loss has been incurred by the individual to whose cate you were intrusted, and to whom, according to the affidavits, you ought to have made a better return. But the' Court has taken all the facts into, its consideration, both the additional pressure thrown upon you when you were sent back to the King's Deed. by the na ture of your more strict confinerneet, and the injury your health sustained, which were the grounds tit the . recommendation of the Jury ; ar.d it troth order and adjudge. that for this offence you pay to the King a fine of +eloo, -led that you be cnnimit:ed to the ctn. wily of the Marshal of the Marsh:thee until that tine be paid." Lord .Cochrane remained on the floor for a few mo ments, but the tine not being paid, the upstaff was sent for, and to the custody of that officer lie WAS committed. In passing through Westminster Hall. his Lordship was repeatedly cheesed by a. crowd of persons wne were waiting to hear the result.—He was afterearJs conveyed to the Ki4's Bench prison, and placed hi the apartments above the lobby which he had owl.' pied after his escape until the expiration of his sentence. I Lord Ellenhortnigh was not on the Bench. The Judges present were Mr. Justice Bailey, Mr. Justice Abbott, and Mr. Justice Holroyd. • The fellowing Judgments were also given by the full Ceuta, upon the motions of the kraantaav GENERAL : William Whittle and William Hamlin, for ob structing Excise Officers in the execution of their duty; sentenced to six months imprisonment. William Hopkin, for an offence against the qua rantine laws, in landing (tom a ship folder quaran tine ; a fine of €2OO and six months imprisonment. James. Browne, James Feint, Thomas Lowther, Thomas Simmons, George Simmons, George Shari. der, and Thomas Hughes, for resciiiiig an impressed seaman ; nine months ipiprisonment each. COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, NUV.,2I. ILIGERS W. POOLg. • M T . Serjeant LENS and Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN this day skewed cause against the rule calling.ort the de fendant. as Deputy Sealer of the Court, to account for baying, refused to seal a writ of calaies ad rerpon• daldram t 0 the day of the festival of St. Luke. It was contended, that by the statute of the-sclBnd 6th oh Edw. VI. this was numbered amang the holidays on which officers of the Court were not bound to at tend to the ordinary business of.suitor. hod that, as their attendance on such days was A s vOlUlltary act, it was not unlawful in them to accept an additional lee for such attendance. But. whatever might be the opinion of the Court as to that - point, the present rule must be discharged, since it must have for its object to obtain an attachment against the defendant as having acted.crimitrelly, whilst, in fact, he had re ceived no tee whatever, and had merely stood upon his legal right of not actingon a Parliementarr holi., day. All that had been settled in the former cases WAS, that the additional-fee so paid-mast be relonded, but in this instance no fee whatever tied been paid. The SOLICITOR Gin/Mier. rind Mr: SetiennONSLOW, in support of the rule, argued that the statute of mod. ward VI. was intended for prornotiog use observance of religious ceremonies, and thetel)re the officer ought not, in legal stricsness, to be at his office on that day ; btu- being there, and seiliegewrits for some, he wes notjustified.in refusing othets. Bolidefs were made to be kept, and not to be sold. Such a practice would enable the officer to make. pttferences and to vary his fees. which co:Ail nit be within' the alloWatice of the Court. The Court were of (Tinian that ho:h parties in this case had stood upon the sttictest point of etiquette. These holidays cerrainiy nevr were intended tor the mere ease of the officer, and therefore he had no right tatake any addiiioual fee on such gri:und. But where a practice had .long Frevailed and grown into an or dinary usagek,the Court would-not impute crimins lity in aciliering to ir, especially as the party might bcingliis actitwa• to recover such damages as he had Isustained. It would be much better if the number of lolitliniwponnie . custniked 4. but it was impossible to an Ittaolvert ;vim any person for doing (that .which. b? Acts Csij'arliameot be had a distinct right to do, via. in th is case, of abstaining from doing certain acts. Ault disthargeo with tow rowcg. IVA NsI(III3OUSE. —Yestt Way Sylrafer in custody on suspicion of robh ifig t h e and Norv.izli Mails, underwent a tint ,- and were discharged. hrIARLIOItnIAGI/-STRIZP.T.—.••BI'ROLARY AIAN --Yesterday Satnild Aliiler way charged with burgiary at Cie house in liolbfsrn, and stealirr,•hats.. %fi.e , of the examination on Monday, when that the prisoner had charged two inn, were discharged. li, was ft):!y clump Bow•ssitiu.—Yesterday W. K.;rig, wife, were re-examined, forging a cheque for 4 . 1500, purpor signatures. of Gostiug,„ Ferrier3, and to defratrl Sir J. Lubbock i:nd Co. T , given in our Pipe? of Friaaz last wer but Sir NATIIANIEL, CON/INT said, 33 1 read over to-itl.e primers, it was unneci capitulate them. He should, therefor , • troiie prisoners ; but as tbe. evidence tLe femirie. the was ciiichargei WI-ANC:Una Accurs s W at ekaen o'chidt, a most nictanchAy (Int...n-6e wail:wag:ions Weather, Srorrotto and DISETSeN, of the C( Lieutenant Liamati, cl the Last In service, who citric home passenger if an a bsence of one )CATS, were protege, boat to North Corner, it became reef extreme aAitation of the sta, to altei boat, and one of the -officers ra\hrr shift his seat I(.r that purpose, when tl upset, and Lieutenants Hulniar and unfortunately drowned.. Lien ttnant St watermen, two in number, were Lived to the Jetty Head of the Dock-74d, by thi spring of the Beelzebub, ut lowered td them by the warden. and rather singular that the watermen are recently saved the lives of Gentril and Neither of the bnd;es have yet been ' Janet Grant and John Cowie. in . c"-Mount, from the parish of :Strachan of Fordoun, on Satni day evening, were overtaken. by a severe snow-start and after wandering for some time, dirough fatigue, to sit down about a greens. Cowie. having reviously panion in his greawcat„tnade several the first part of the light, to recove, not succeoing, he get back to whir in a few hour ! : became insensible. with great difficulty, when the niorni to get to Know-grkens, where she and treated with it:eel% humanity ; brosat tonne, and although still c. t radually rec , ivering.—lmmethatel : Know-gietos. seerch was made tot found stiff and cold, and comtd w; He was latoit. 6 ht honte to his taiii?7 all the recommended for pended,anirnation were tried by Di after about bit hours incessant labcitst cheerfully n,sisted by all around hi say that gill their humane'ezrrtiots Ex.F.CUTIoN%-....Yriter,..1 st7irninl eiglat o'clock,Mr.sSheritT ICIRnr ant riff, togtther with the Under Marsh rstity, atterded ll•zwte, preprat val of Re&ri S.vith aud Charlet Pirrtiet Monday senteuced to death tor thc Thomas Johnson, Captain - of the about thirty leagues from Algiers; tt. she place appointed to carry into efft mandate of the law. Almost imme 'commission of the horrid act, the de! became repentant, and continued ment. Some time previous to the had so fit mly made up his mind tr nilested a wish to be placed wii and be wrote to Mr. NkWMAN tor Mr. Nawst.tu could not acsittreKe One of the most singular circumsta+ tended any person executed latet Both the prisoners being quite signed to their tare, lay down to sleep and twelve o'clock on Wcdoesdav very sound until four o'clock, wl in much perturbation, and the noi, was accompanied awoke his cowry the cause being inquirtd into, lip sal That Brock and Gillman (who veer, executed for the murder of tuo ' Fox revenue cutter) were . to have in his (Forney's) presence ; he sa lift the axe, the fatal Wow was gi/ the expression of agony that toh Moody consequence produced the uttered. Tay wsre attended by Newgate, the Rev. Mr. •BAKEtt, VessEv, the latter of. whom v..ccerr. Cart. A little before n;rie o'ciodc to the cart. Finney h.id a Ham over which Siti;th d with - we; .cavalcade 'stud lixecutien . . past te It, and betore plete, the unktuy men sene taunt. A young mot of the name of WI a wholesale 'hotise at Nottingham , book cut from his inside poCket'r whilst looking at the maletactof Newgate. There was a 45 J 341.! in the hook, several provincial uut of etch:lnge for acceptance. • • - MARI/JED. 'At.t!se Menge Of Ratisen, the'•.s•h inst. Calm to. to Cathtrins Ann, thivit daugt Cock, Ministertlnit. At i'utref, !be tI th Vostoosent ;0 Ann, ridtot dull:ter of Alessi 1)1E0. At Otero Valle) , esPate, in the island o; of August bet, Mr. Andrea . !trvenson, At t'atti4ster Stalth, ,war of a Jropy, aged 74, Mr. * Ralph Cowler two years, has uncle• gone the op. r taw: • PRICK OF S'ICCKS Rank Stock 2.3:-.4 lad a St, s per Ct. Red. attlif Inti!A Bonds Ditto Cons. 63i 6.t hip. AWL •ft 4 per emits: 71If 77t 78 I Etc:scatter MU VI-O g r e ' &per Cent. Navy 9541.11. • I Cans. roma& Long Anna. lti I-I t • 1.1)N1).)N• ed ny.l.tvat. ri. r, kubLake4l there, an 4 a: Op 6:ar-Jf4ce, foopii -• ' r • the M 0 ' • 71 t. 1 • / IT BY kV/ .• • E• e Ettve th e l ap m•trtlt me n • X pl 7 nnii•ted fo e eli6l W. I • Lcmpr Artril°n c!'r MIR to h e • we usittY 1 4.1 Co. k i nt h The frte`, 14 B Pere Telt, as they 1, 1 r Dow trosecesisiry , • Vac tact- c•itrw t th • io ta e wa s 11:144, t•ed, its of 1 4mdsy won; as La ale ad itteiil e i n (van , • • A. Licilimmt Cornk a ti s , xi• ...• In Jla Co m°4l' EfOR inthat tro p aft, ;:, a d mi Tcsso, 7 , f r „, ll lOW to rbeic, m , dim , l ll4ll ✓ suiltitTly t 1 sate bo lt nd lbhttsos Stopf rdAgdu astr , red, by s • • ~ d, %%hitt they s*ll until topes • sai nd soiuri tt h s are the vale sit lin n to tted ASP crossing t h e , free e 90, pl ere l e 7lllltu e e r( a r l haa n, a werri Isis l ui , l in en r . adi a e a : l ii . fi ks s et4W w r t thi w ttil ,t : 'Nt n tl y, bih tl it ed i liiaN io ir s.ll l PK/ over the road ; , t, site net Gr Pak. lir" ; she WAS nett Sod cor Ened to beds isisit•B Ply on I:er itrirrit " 1 " . : 3 T.viqi a coal • 's house, w or restating set. uot Dr. Chntrun; bat, r l B :nor, in wincisbe wits him. we lament to :s prc;red in 'tin. pi 10,1 ling, at hall pia I and the Under Sis arshal of the Adai, a U‘l,. tip nrittoq to the rear •on .tsrheg, wito Mere L ou d, the wilful itandell c creole afvwfair, to Eieemiceidaits effect die lasi t Ao 'media tely miter 6 wi deluded ntsistatt6 I IC/ to the last their WA. Furth , • 'to die, that he a 1 , A fflith the coniemnt " 'r that purpose ce in thaSrequest, • stances that has • ely is the followil . e composed and I 1 . sleep between eleti tam day night, and des ae when Forney aga • noise with which trade (Smith). t t I said, that he ti 'ts were some time • snot o of the crew of 1 ire their heath Olt • saw Ow esecut • i g , i ,i v i e n n w , ed ,ind is— h a e n he d ,he Itidlous shriek by the Ozdinny , and the Rey. t ; , Irpanied t...trn in • t c. k. they %tete I:shcc • vet Lock iii his groat attetitino. . • Drick about ha Ceririttocy brisg cc I inched into sterna) I Webtincath. clerk I sit • Ihid his peck t. ti yeste•Jay tuut i o'r •I a :tors defiiirtitig ft' ' ell ar.k. of n 4 .1% uotes, sod some b 4 istittr a the Rev. Wi:4 it Alesande? !tier' ll sr l Amaa. Kt ;tip, &apt, 'ter. , of Jamaiza, in the m tow 111, tyrgeint. r-Street, an :!:r 10 t' „__ vlov, with, klir lig tl4l lll iti..pine t. I~'!'Lltl)At. a ,tt.ek a Bonds 1617 Pr . :irqusr toAst pr. 4 I 'I •