Star. — London, England, 1816-01-27 00:00:00

~; k & • " . • ••: LINES, LIKING WI I III A DETACHUENT OR AnivaLuair, IfITIIIIIS2D TO JOltl 0111600 . • • ':)gill, kikd Maid, Tareviell ! with masa) , a•tear ' Farewell, with thee, to all ny soul holds dear. • Where'er I go, by Fate, by Fortune led, Where loudest thun4rs raging round my head; Borne by rough ovbirlarlacla to a !wattle shore, 114 y Aad heart whispers—to return no more! • Still shall 'thy cherish'd form possess my soul, • Inspire wjpaction, and engross the whole: And if loreicltiom'd to press a foreign plain, 'Midst gasping crowds, the earliest victim slain; More than his owtt, thy pangs will wound his mind, Who leaves his Mary,eand his peace behind ! L.lll l IN7E-LLIGi,;NCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, JANUARY ea. • tY pARTE GALLIMORE re Geo.lmottt. This was the p::tition of the bankrupt, praying that the commission which had been issued against trim might b.• superseded, and that the pe:itioning creditor might be ordered to pa) the costs. The case was argued during the grev.ter part of yesterday, and the whole of this clAy, by Sir S. 110. DULLY; Mr. CuA.Lem, and Mr. BELL, on the part , rf the petitioner; and by Mr. Leach, Mr. Como:, and Mr. SHADWELL. on behalf of th • pett,ioning creui tOr. Mr. WEIZAILSY was retained r.ir the same side, but declined saying any thing,. as he conceived the matter had been most ably and fully argituti by the Learned Opntlemen who preceded him. .:air S. Im bit:A.lr is to reply on Monday next, till which day we reserve the details of this case, which is of consider. able importance to persons engaged in trade, from the various cases cited by the Bat as constituting acts of bankruptcy. COURT OF KiNG'S BENCH, JANUARY 26. slit .1()H\ LUBBOCK AND CO. 1,. INGLIs. We stated the Nets oft is case in the Wile of he Sittings at Westminster after last Term. It was action against the London Dock Company for the value of 750 hides belonging to the plaintiffs, deli vered cub of the warehouses of the CompAy by means or forgery of the signature of a person of • the name of Btoattmead. Tie verdict was given in fa vollr of the praititiii; the amount of damages having been referred to Mr. BOLLAND. The ATT orrnee-GeNEttah to-day moved to 'et aside the vcro:icr. , n the ground that a fact had been ditc:osed since the trial, which, it it did not entAely relieve the responsibility of the Dock Company, at male them liable only for nominal damages'. foreery under which the hides were refill qu.shed by tie Company, the Taylors, who bad been the p,:tintiff's skin brokers, had. been recently tried any cluilted. The fact, however, was nit to be. cl-nio - 1„oad i: was the foundation of the plaintiff's sl:rn.o% t. 1 ant tred in evidence at the Old Bailey, that before e hank. uptcy of the Taylors, the ptain tiffs nad been apprized that the golcts were act in toe wArehouses ol their brokers, and that s had rettlested that the supdosed contract w ith Bro.odniead should not be enforced. Ti:e p 1 tintiffs CODSCIaIe4 .0 cfons.der of the point, and waited until alter the oaokruptcy of the*Taylors, before and no tice WA, given to the Dec'c Company, that the hides bad 'teen improperly delivered out of their ware. houses, though ti:e had been made acquain ted with the ta:.! some time bdore the f Inure of the brokers. This addizional fact was the ground for the application. Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—Whether that fact destroys the plaintiff's riglit of action may be a question, but it appears to be very material. It Sir J. Lubbock and Co had given due notice to the Company, the! latter, by the common law remedy of a writ of re-' plevin, might have instantly re-posse4sed themselves of the hides. Before a plaintiff charges :mother party on the ground of negh 6 ence, he must shew that he did all in his po eer tot prevent the mischief of which he complains. Rule to shew cause granted. • CLARKE V. HARVEY. This was a qui tam action, under the 49th Geo. 111. c. 126, for more effectually preven,ir g the sale and brokerage of offices. The defendant, the printer and pubiisher of a morning newspaper. i.iserted an ad vertisement, purporting to be an offer of £lOO or rell.ro to any person who could procure for the adver tiser a permanent mercantile appointment under Go vernment, or under certain public establishments named in the act, which imposed a penalty of 450 for so doing, which the plaintiff sougt.t to recover at the sittings alter last term. The verdict was given against the defendant. Mr. Cuawoon moved to arrest the judgment on two grounds, first, That the advertisement in ques tion was not properly set out in the record, it being stated to be an offer of a sum of money for a promise of an appointment, instead of an offer for an ap. pointment ; two very different things, as a person might be very willing to give £lOO ter a place, aid very unwilling to give the same sum for the mere pro _ mist of a place at a future time. The second ground was that it the words of the advertisement pegs to Ire relied upon, they did not with sufficient accuracy and precision serout the'offence, consit:eiing tliat the present was a penal action, requiring as distinct an averment as an indictinent for perkiry, ur fur obtain ing money under take pretences ; at least the terms Ot the•advertisement ought to brink the charge strictly within the statute. Lord ELLENSOROVGII. II You need not put an. lnuendo on rhe terms ot. the advertisement to explain them. if in the plain sense of the words, they bring, the offence within the statute. NO . doctrine has been carried to a more extravagant extent thin that of inueados ; it generally proceeds upon the supposition that the language has no grammar, and the Jury no understanding." Mr. CURWOc4D submitted, that the advcitisement was spec;fically for an appointment, whereas the words of the act were" place, olE:e, inployment.", Mr. Justice liameis referred Mr. Car -:ood to the 4th and sth sections of the statute, wt L.:t the word appointment was inserted. The Court, rejecting the words of the declaration on which the first objection was founded as sur- ' plusage, and not finding any ground for the second, the rule Ni,i was refused. • BAKING AND co. V. COME AND CO. A verdict was given !or tar plaiuLitf, damages £1,423. Ss. 6d. at the last Sittings at Guildhall. It WAS au action forthe value of 51./hogsheads of sugar, which. the plaintiffs esitended the defesklents had bought through the medium of Coles and Co. their brokers. The case excited considerable interest, in consequence of the reprobation given to the practice of brokers dealing also as merchants, which here occasioned the principal difficulty. The real question was, whether the defendants had a TWA to set off the value of these sugars against a larger debt, due from Cafes and Co. at the time of their bankruptcy, to them, they having knowledge that Coles and Co. were merely agents for the plaintiffs, and be lieving them to be acting as principals in the transac tion. The . plaintiffs, OR the contrary, insisted that the sugars were their property, that Coles and Co. were only their brokers, and that the defendants were consequently liable to them. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL now moved for a new trial on all the three grounds, that the verdict was against law, against the evidence. and contrary to the direction of the Chief Justice.—Rule granted. THE KING V. PHILPOTS. A criminal information had been moved for, against the defendant. at the suit of the Rev. Mr. Halifax, and.the rule to shew cause was enlarged from the last Term. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that an explana tion had since taken place between the parties, who had formerly been- on terms of intimacy, and that he understood the prosecutor was satisfied with the apology Mr. Phil is w,s ready to make publicly, viz. that h ' s mis Conduct had beet, occasioned by temporary irritation at what he imagined a provoca tion en the Fa 01 Mr. Ha►ttaz. CHARGN OP AIIIRDFR. Thomas Thomas, whose case has often been men timed in the proceedings of the Court, was ont to the bar, And holding up ois hand, was arraigned lir shooting Thomas Moore, the lishrrman at Rochester, who, in the l')I , hore.hoat, Aiprtmched a King's ship, in which the prisorier, a ma: ine, was statiosed on guard. He was committed in the custody of ill , Marshal, to be n a:•eitted to the County Jail of Kent. COURT (IC COMMON PLEAS, JAN. 26. C:.K.-YI;DDLII YARYAN/K. The Soticiroi. Gess:Lys:. ni.ived for a rule to shew cause why dhe extent; •n in this case upon a writ of inquiry betort: the Sheriff of ;-liclalesex, should not be set on the ground of excessive damages. The Learned Serjeailt said ;his was an action for criminal conversat•-h. and he a•lmitted that many cases might occur in which tlafy iLicendant otiAlit to pay, but in tlis case the Jury had exceeded all rule or pretence its! giving dair..iees. The defendant, a young offi cer the engini....as, had left England for the army io Canada v . 4en the action was brought, and his Counsel con.d not be furnished with all the informa tion and circquistances ref this cause. It was stated by the plaintiTs Counsel, that Mr. !toddle had been some time se..arated from his lady, in consequence of his circumstances, not being able to support her. She went to live with her father, a most distinguished character, where the seduction took place which was the subject of the action. Here the Learned Serjeant observed,. if any irregularity took place in A family, it was nee , :ssary to prove it in a Court of Justice; but' it was merely stated at the inquisition that separatain occurred, and they remained on good terms. Whe ther the same affection remained between them after the separation, was not proved by any one witness. It w.s ;.tted in the opening by Counsel, that the de -I,n.i :Li sy'rth £IOOU a-year. A milliner was the only p‘rsoa calied to prove that the defendant. and the lady had been seen together, and she merely stated that they had once been seen together at her shop two or three years ago. It was not proved that the defendant had ever seen the husband in his life.' There was no evidence that he knew her to be mar ried. A Gentleman from Cox and Greenwood's, the agents of the engineer corps, proved that the defen dant's income could not be much more than tour or five hundred pounds a-year, and he said he did not know he had any funds. On this evidence alone the Jury gave three thousand pounds. He did not mean to dispute the opinion of a Learned Judge, who had said, a man ought to pay horn his purse or in his person ; but in this case there was no ground forjarge damages. The young man (he did not mean say it was so) might have met the lady at the Theatre, without knowing who or what she was. Under all the circumstances, the Solicitor-General expressed hope that the Court would feel that the Jury, when they gave damages to the amount before stated, had not considered what the case was. Cute, Justice Pray, brother Shepherd, were these parties ever proved by evidence to have been together ?"—Souct TOR.GEN ER A Lo••• " Never." Cans Justice. — " I know very well, that suffer ing judgment to go by default, the defendant admits guilt ; but that does not preclude the plaintiff from going into the circumstances of the defendant's guilt, for the purpose of increasing damages. As I under stand from you, there was evidence that the plaintiff, and his wife were separate, but no evidence .of the manner In which they lived after, there being no sort of conjugal connexion between them while she lived with her father.„" SOLICITOK-G&V . ERAL.-a There was no evidence of their communicating together :the Counsel for the plaintis was proceeding to read , a letter, when the Sheriff interrupted him, aad said he thought it was not evidence." Catty Jusrics.--u Unless we were to determine, that in no possible case of criminal conversation a rule to chew cause ought to be granted, we must grant it in this. It appears in this case the husband and wife were separated; and there was no proof for the last three years that the husband had access to his wife. The first ground of damages is—what the plaintiff has lost in the losing the society of his wife. and there the case is lett extremely lame. With re spect to the misconduct of the defendant, which might lead to large damages, there is no proof that the defendant had any communication with the wife, or knowledge thal the plaiutiff was living—no plans of •seduction. Under these circumstances, it seems to us a fit case for heaiing what was proved,. and whe: ther there is occasion for the verdict to the extent it has gone." —Rule granted. • CONSISTORY COURT, JANUARY 20. MACH "I W. MACHAIL This was a proceeding for a divorce, at the instance I of Annabelle. the wife of Robert Macnab, Esq. a Colonel in his Majesty's Army, against him, on the ground of adultery. It appeared, that the parties were married en the 21st of January, NM, at 3m:tains-bill, Bats, MU. .• • • , . . • ; MaenalPbeing then a Mies *Aker. Th is ey liven td- # gether from that time at the Colonel's residence, is Nbttingham-street, St. Mary-la.bonne, and atterwards i in Ranelagh-street, Pimlico, until the transaction which formed the basis of the .present proceedings came to the knowledge of Mrs. Macnab, kind iiiducW' her to separate from him. About April 11111, the Colonel's footman, John Price, observed some circuit stances in the conduct and behaviour of the Co lonel and Sarah Chew, the housemaid, which induced him to suspect a criminal intimacy between them.— The Colonel was in the habit of lying in bed Lite io the morning and taking his breakfast there, and also of retiring to bed before his wife at night. Upon those occasions, whilst Mrs. Macnab was out taithie her morning walks, or engaged with her female friends of an evening, Sarah Chew used ao steal into the Colonel's bed-room, at his call. Ad remain mere with him for considesable periods of time together.—: Once, in perticul ir, when Mrs. Macnab bad had ate early dinner, and taken the Colonel's twe, children, by a /eraser wife, to Astley's Amphitheatre, the Colonel afterwar•ls dined alone, and contrived to send the ser vants out on different errands ; but Price, ally toot man, returning privately, heard the Colonel call Sarah Chew, at the top oh the kitchen stair!, upon , which the latter went up to him, and they yalired . to his room, but Sarah Ceew having observed Price, he was again sent •ait by t':e C , .1::oel. At anoth er time, whilst Mrs. ivlacnab was from home, some wive which had been ordered, was sent home, and Price, the footman, went up stairs to the Colonel for dirLc tions where it was to be &posited, and entering t h e bed-room rather suddenly, he observed the Colonel and Sarah Chew in a situation which left no doubt of their criminality. In July following, he had pcca.. sign to be at Andover, Hants, for some time, in con sequence of being Impect:ng Field Officer of 'the troops in that tie ghboui hood, Ind whilst there, slept two or three nights with one Catherine Freeili, (a former servant of his, by whom he had had aichild), at lodgings taken by her, as if lor herself an 4 has.; band, and, since the separation with his wife,,the has lived with the Colonel as his only servant. ; These circumstances were fully detailed in the evidence of several witnesses, particularly of Price, the footman, and a Mr. and Mis. Dew, of whom the hsegings at Newbury were takea, and they particularly identified Colonel Macnab as the person who slept at Newbury in consequence of the latterhaving been brought to town for that purpose, and having, with Price, watched t!:e Colonel's house until they saw him come . (,:ut, and at terwards seen bins leading a deed at his solicitor's, which he was abotit to execute. No defence t:•as offered, Cohnel Macnab hiving cleaned employing Counsel, and • Sir Wit.t.it:a Sc :TT expressed his opinion, that the case was proved by evidence as conclusive as could well be conceived in a case of this description. He shortly stated the lt.ading points of it, observing, that there was no deficiency in any part of it, and that the identity, in particular, WAS very clear. He therefore pronounced fur the divorce. SOUTHWARK SESSIONS. CHARGE Or MUNDER.—Yesterday Efisakth stood capitally indicted, for unlisrfully making an assault upon a new-born female child, with intent to murder it. Mary Haynes deposed, that she resided in Tooley-- street. The prisoner was a servant, living with a Mr. Palmer, in .the adjoining house. On the Ist of December last, being in bet own yard, she.heard the screams of an infant proceed from that of &Ir. Pal mer's ; she immediately went round to the house of the • latter, and communicated the circumstance to Mrs. Palmer, who accompanied her to the priv Here they found the prisoner in a state of great dis tress and agitatiOn, so as to leave no doubt of a de livery having taken place. With this she was taxed, and after some difficulty Ml 6. Palmer succeeded in extractingirom her a confession. The Beadle of the Parish and another Officer were immediately sent for, and the floor of the privy being raised, the infant was discovered, whit-h, together with the prisoner, was conveyed to me Workliotise. Every assistance that was requisite was applied to save the life of the infant, but it only - survived a month. ' • • Mrs. Palmer corroborated the testimony of the last witness, as did Little and Andrews, the Officert,-4.: The latter, in addition, stated, that when-they teach". ed the yard where the prisoner was found, she evinced every sign of grief, and uttered the mbst mentable cries respecting the child. Mrs. Palmer further stated, that some time previous to the trails= action in question, she had discovered the ptisn'ttcr was pregnant, and on that account, was about to give her warning to leave the house. She represent ed her, however, in every other respect, as a good servant and a humane person. The prisoner continued in a state of weakness, and almost of insensibility, during the trial, and 'being called upon for her defence, she fell into a swoon. The RECORDER having summed up the evidenoe, the Jury retired for about ten minutes, and then re turned a verdict of acquittal. MANSION HOUSE. Yesterday fifteen of those wretched females, whom the LORD MAYOR has determined to expel tram the streets, were brought up, and being examined by his Lordship upon their conduct, they were severally committed to Bridewell for one month each. HATFON GARDEN. Yesterday Jeremiah U.Shee, porter at the Old Bull Inn, Holborn, was fully committed to Newgate for trial, on a charge of stealing a. trunk belonging to a coach passenger who bad arrived at the Inn. Q UEEN-SQUAR E. GANG OF POACHERS,—The estates of several Gen tlemen in Norfolk being infested with a gang of poachers, particularly the estates of T. P. Bagg, Esq. T. Dearing, Esq. and T. Hare, Esq. of Stow Hail, they wrote to this Office for assistance to take the de predators into custody. Pace and another officer were in consequence sent down, and after concealing them selves fur several nights, they fell in with the gang yesterday . sennight, and took eight of them, and two more on the following night. The prisoners were all committed to Swaffham Jail till the Sessions. A few days since, a French lodging-house keeper in East Smithfield, was committed to rothill•lields prison, for not having a licence from the Alien Of fice, agreeable to the Act, and not.making a due re turn of all foreigners, kilo time to time, coming to lodge in his house. . b torn. - 6` COAT. MARKI-. JANUARrtii. Ships at Mar - t. Shipp .rla Pjlc % 731 NeWeattle gl 01. t o 11, pi Surll.nti • 4 41%. ed. t 3 JAM 111 :11 :LI ) PAARKET, ! ANVARY a.; 1 • De hiril li ttAi 44: s. 0 0 1 t t : SS. 4: 64 If :•7:14 I ' . :I 111 , 4 I : I ~ 6 Iteaor7o—Sheep and I.asobs 3,450 —C .I%e, lea ". I Mcalow I-loy 111 lad to 4 1 151 ekwer 41 0 6 • Atiaw Ss to La il a . Nl:wiarz AND LF.ALMNHALL t • (By the rarear A.) •444 1 rer stone is 41 to 4s. LRt Veal & - Si Pi rw 4. 1'.41: a oa* PRICES OF HAY AN!) SIKAW waYESliaju. t —• • •sr. JAIS es's. rtackAyi s t Hay 31 Os Od to 41 15. Od Hay 41 e s t . i "7 * a.... ill t 34 el to 21 is Od I Str aw 11 Its s e H! --_.___...__`'g . PiticE. OF 11JP:i. .stl Iv BACiI, laze fogiup s. • Kent 51 O. to II Lts 1 Keats.. 4 7t Os se li t 7 4. ,:sseX 41 15. to 71 :Is I &risen 61 Se Is . !;',,r4 • 9: 'O, :n tit Dos I I.attittant 121 0 4 1 , „"' ". _______ _____._,-----L_ RAW HOLT. lea Heifers and Stc. ro (per lOM nary 16 ad , stone) - ss 44 as es el I\ o l:xltet Calf. is to! to a.• (WIl c.o. horse .4411 A PRItF OF l'Ai.l.OW. Caulks per dos. t is ad —Nlow,l6. les 4,1.•'!: Yes/low Soap, 224—.Mosticd, , __-- --. 1 . COUN VRY MAKE I'S. thiIIIDGL, Let * Ys.—Whee pet hikid fw % tie Baal, per quarter 2S, to 2r',. Cat. t't's to 20 4 to 335. Old Beans rts to 3.R. Peo, 32a C.O :51. OX fOR I); /Fp. 'tt. 'J.—Price ut the (2 ,arte-n ...Qat, sit being co. vr. it, r hus.'.lo. PK!Ct . .S OF GOI.O ANL) riweign (nLI :11 4 New .Douidoons dr3 IR 0 J New I).4P:tre . - - DIRT I Wedopss!ar, at his house in Co7E:id'sli. , l rar e , t h e L t Rear. Admiral Sir Ctiorge Cockburn, of a i!au ;',ten •• 'Fburatlay sr tic ght , ar Starner Pak , cow; y ciar eo l e of Lieurcilant-Colotkel cuPeo, of a s•.o. MAK Ri h. On the 2tth inst. at I.ympstone, Devon, i.y the Real Gedoin. W. S. Harni!tbn, Eq. in Dublin, to Mrs. Funk January 9, by special licence, at Nork Ronk, .surr, T 4 rick Siena. t French, Esq. el.b.st of !nr L) au of Kilda:to Hun. Miss Heitni.l seeltoel daugiste r of Lord Ar a January. 6, in A. eave.l Church, the is ev. Mr. Ski ClogLer, to Mari Anne, scc, n.l Laughter of thalas*Phi g das, F.sq. of GN!:.i • Sunday, at P ic!onond,YOrk ‘ivre, the Ref.. hunch Ebci LL.B. Vicar of•Brtgual, *hie. living het( td 35 year. December 21, at Greenock, &Ned 61, NI r. Julie t U m , tnrr!!• one of tbei IVLyistrves.oltbal town. • Last mouth, at near Fort Wiliiaa 1, Serjentt Fraser, late of the It irt regiment, in the 991 year ot hit Its is supposed have been .he last survivot of dupe wit..la under his young Chief, in the cause of the unfortunate Kra Stuart. in 1746. lIAVING dect.elted miry-Ives to the :104, been gratified by the mast considert.hle practint:2 branch which we thau:Vit roper to &elect, n e trust kneel not mare misemployLd tiur time, than those who, in kd tire field of the prufetstop, are occaoon . ally immersed is r tainty, and cannot always attains that succ.)s which i, ace . _ by e q ue.liteatlu g the intellectual power to otr , -• dart ot distil The diseases of Zlettli'y are peculiarly disurestug, la . bring with theta a treks of cameos...ant symptoms, aud,k pression of el vital poogy, existence itself be(),:nts imb .Whether they arise from the prevale'lc oi it( exam*, cructive habit* of school-boys, or the lesS e.tersatile ad. of ma . urity, they require slue Rb,' as ii . I ,tiou s profeetsd and well may it be observes!, :hat by the i tt il ( Falle r i t led men, the symptoms are aggravated, and 'the coast* destroyed. . 1 As hle.uhcri of the Royal College of Surgeons, fa 4 r Surgeons in his. l'slajesty's service, we ground per phosesi: regularity of Educailoo; and possessing every picke to tire, we feel ourselves entitled to that curilideuce orrh te'' . have hitherto been ,o liberal'y honoured, hi the hrst sensations of local weakness, early applicrisil prevsnt the calamity of a debilitated triniv; h 4.: where tki fere., from a cory.ciousnesi of the uanuni:tiots ut the ties el caused his misfortune, is fearful ot the zolittmipt-or mow his family physician, and broods over h!. infirmity withal concealment, it must be saisfactoey for him to be sutra: only of capability of treatment, but alto ot the most is li 1 'dly. The Venereal Disease eraltaintnatea the 'pity 9i l the i,:eds of existtmce are poisht.el Loy 0; and posterity is iy by the indiscrttiun of an ungitudel moment. In recent Venereal complaints; it is ro ,sible to pretest! danger, or distress ; and in the meat complicated cages st acquirement of exclusive experience in this line, to elf stal certain, and speedy re-eitalliishnt.:git. We otter the advantage of ttiie ex;:erienee to tho.etif .sex Avl..) are i.filicted with any kibd of debility, or any Aymo a Venereal infection, rid in all cases the terms of round. lit atate4..on the first intertiew. ; I+ati e nt s I t : the'eountry are espeited" to endow a Will •and are.reques...d to silcc:Py Ca. it ae-• and manatr of 1114, 1 1 wca As tbt exiAing syx etuals• 44 the cornittint CUR.RIE aza Membets of Al Rny ti Onlege of Surgeons in Lotgiutal • liditi!) , lrkh, 107, HatruniCardiw—iJan..l4 I , 11\i POR rAN:r ADV/CLII" No, 13, 1.54 11 verie-vregt, Fkr54,49114 WHEN Men' Enc:itinn anti Profession:lj tv.••: perieverina entle.reari:tis'4ll.ove . i . the most certain meth. •1 ..t treatty.g.aVi„prelf.iiiisll4olfaies, the ful result of tliv:r .-xperience is the bestyroof ofsgeri?fiff. Fiftee:s yews have we ..;rriretl• , ;he ei treatment of Three Dl.ordess a aiiiltheTamplgtf leak* . ing our plan, gives us ~:pkitselswpcs t ss, ble the ravagus of tho • e con* 301sliviti:c4:1* : en malt hi of all the infirmities to wlilch the hums:: iscelvsny.treltia" After an authorisi.l - iittrodUrtum ixo tvNy branch of • Science, we detertnect on prli:rce, to diviiluals from their:Gnome of ir.:educa:e '..usenstor the dangerous precipimicy of a general.Pricitiootr. • The three cl•srlers, to ! . .iecure of which webire Ural" attention, comprise evo y species of Vcntreglufeetise, of recent or long dura•ion ; all kinds of flellilfty g • ciency, whether arising front el: secret tisblts the Indulgencies of mature age, terminating In impotso4 l sometimes in consumption ; and lastly, :hat ilrtanin?;_.„," l4 l system in womtn, %void' is • rrt ar i'led Ilaaniesis many eases originating in a similtr error.. , ' • Numerous diseases are the result cf treatotent of simple o.isioraccs, and 'lrtiok.-tinfletplovo pens that the seeds of life are pcii-ontilis teolllfibs of an unguarded moment. By a superior roespi t Taints are easily cured; and evon where' otritifiliff trust that we may offer an effectual rostorattlaa. The Diseases of the l'rethia ; fr:quently comics::/1 ; j Or arising from the above c6.l , :lptanl Ilittr . r•it attetttion ; by Fa iolaible and isms' ovvd ICLO; v ' t*- 614' I bled to remove übb:inate Gkets dad Sint:aro, 4 +. %hi% cent or of long • Jur:qion, wirhciir r',Nortfiti'ar t'hel•a mw dangerous use of tbe...cate4tic lastagie, Vans immoral" adduced to very inv4trz..t, c t tst:s., several.)ears coma!' having yielded to our Method 4;) n ,, alter the tal l been attempted by orter'ffriersq..; ,, ,,• etf.tt• To be : cetuulted:clailtifty Patients 4): ialier ses i ndboo! delicacy, apkiutegtioffn e ....Lauw. i r ," . t ;„ count ry, coal" tse parieunti of tO,O case, ait s. ami instinct of DOA sil l a renrittanee" duly 'attended sta. and advice *CI higig t ". I warded** anfrarrof the kittgli.s.ir red GOSS, and Co. Mearbers at 'be yal Sti • t • HIGH WA'rERTU-IVIORROW AT 1.64700 N totlif Mont % J 9 ntii.utr. atter 1 Afternoou - tS ;tut:urea-ale 1•• L9NDUN: Printed by.L at. K6NT. Picket published there, and at the Star Office, Tampa ia