Star. — London, England, 1809-02-24 00:00:00

P.ARLMiIIEiI22- PROCEEDINGS. Mr. WALLACE spoke to order, he considered it, fltira ' ' i'Wreall from a paper, of which' it was the bj t orthe motion to obtain the production. , The SPEAKBR: observed that it was perfectly in Order for a Gentleman -to *ate the grounds for his motion. Mr. CREEVEY proceeded to read from the Ex position, when . The SPEAKER informed him that it was not re gular to read to the House that which he was asking the House to order to be produced. It was the same as with a petition, of which a Member might state generally what was the scope and nature, but it was not allowed to be read, even at the table, till the per mission of the House was received. Mr. CREEVEY, desisting from reading the pas sages, took a general view of the motives which in duced him to offer this motion to the House. 1 Mr. DUNDAS said, it was very unusual, when a • Committee was appointed, to anticipate the report of that Committee, by calling for any particulirdocu ment before the time when the others wereio be produccd. He doubted not but the Committee would produce th it and every other paper relating to the affairs of the Company in due time. 1 Mr.W HI [TREAD compared the conduct of those interested in keeping back the paper called for, to that of a schoolb )y he had read of, who would not say A, lest he should be compelled to say B. The exposition called for was of great importance. It could do no harm, it might be productive of much good ; he therefore trust' d it would be brought forward. After some further observations from Mr. Dug- I DAS, Mr WHITBREAD, Mr. WALLACE, Lord FOLK STONE, Mr. P. MoottE, Mr. HOWARD, Mr. GRANT, and Mr. CREEVEY, the motion was negatived without a ! division. Select Committee to inquire into the affairs of the East India Company. After stating the object to which the Committee would have peculiarly to direct their attention, and dwelling on its great impomande, he concluded by naming the Members of the Commit, tee, which were the same as those of last Session, with the exception of two, who were not in town.' Mr CREEVEY objected to the Committee being constituted of the same members as those of last year, by whom a Report, of only a very trifling nature, had been made. He urged the importance of the subject, and the necessity of having it considered by those who were impartial ; and remarked, that he had always observed, that much more information had been af forded on this subject by those who were not intimately acquainted with India affairs than by those who were. Sir A. WELLESLEY denied the justice of the last observation made by the Honourable Gentleman, and with respect to himself, asserted, that on the only occasion on which a serious difference of opinion had taken place in the Committee of last session, he had voted with the Honourable Gentleman. He declared himself perfectly prepared to go into the merits of the ; Administration in India, of his Noble Relation, when- HOUSE OF COMMONS. ever that subject should be brought forward in Parlia- The I ORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND moved for leave to bring in a Bill to repeal an Act of the Parliament of Seotlard, merit. relative to Child-murder, and to assimilate the law of Scotlandin [Here a Message from the Lords acquainted the that respect, to the law of England. Leave given. House that their Lordships had agreed to the Militia Mr. FOSTER presented an Account of Flax Seed imported , i Enlisting Bill, with several Amendments, to which N into Ireland in the year IS. they desired the concurrence of that House.] The Mutiny Bill was read a sec ond time. Mr. EYRE presented a Petition from the Hundred of Castt- Mr. C REEVEY, in explanation, denied that he had yen, in the county of Lincoln, praying for aid in consequcnce•of made any personal objections whatever to the gallant the devastations by the late inundations. Referred to a Committee. General, his objection was generally to those filling Si r CHARLES POLE presented a Peti tion from Mr. Robert . Eyre, complaining of a denial ..4 justice, in the refusal of Prize- official situations. Money due for Capture in the "East Indies. Ordered to lie on I Lord A. HAMILTON entered into a long detail the table. of the circumstances attending the administration of A Petition was presented, praying for a Reward for a D:sco affairs in British India, into which it became Parlia very to save the Lives of the Crews of S hi p s founderin g at Sea. Ordered to lie on the table. ment to inquire. He by no means, ever, believed, Mr. YORKE presented a Petition, praying for aid for those ' t hat to the East-India Company, the evils of which who had suffered from the inundation in the Isle of Ely, in Cam- he complained were attributable. On the contrary, bridgeshire, and the other ten countries. The loss amounted to he thought that they were the victims, not the authors a million sterling. A great many poor people were ruined, and the land could not be broug ht a g ain into cultivation for a twelve- , and instruments of oppression. month. Ordered to lie on th e table. Mr. W. SMITH expressed his anxiety that the Mr. FYNES presented a Petition, praying for farther aid for Committee should be constituted in such a manner as carrying on the Repairs in Henry the Seventh's Chapel, in West shonld not give any opportunity for the least suspi minster Abbey. After some observations !furls Sir JAMES ILstt and Mr. Practviet, the Petition was orderea to be referred to a cion, with respect to the impartiality of their investi- Committee. ' LETTER FROM THE DUKE OF YORK TO THE Mr. WILBERFORCE defended t he D ire c tors of HOUSE. the East-India Company from any imputations of an The SPEAKER, after soliciting the particular at- I improper bias on this subject, and contended, that t(ntion of the House, stated, in the following terms, I wany of those Directors were entitled to the gratitude l:is having received a letter from the Duke of York : of the Company and of the country, when it was I have to acquaint the House, that since I can e cor s',lered that they devoted their whole time, and down here I have received a letter from his Royal exerted themselves to the extent of their ability, in Highness the Duke of York ; tke contents of which I the service of the East-India Company for that which relate to the inquiry respecting his conduct as COM- was a very paltry and inadequate remuneration. manner in Chief, which has taken place in this House. Mr. WHITBREAD contended, that the principle Is it the pleasure of the House that I should now read that ought to be acted upon in the appointment of this letter ?"—(4ye, aye from all sides.) `this Committee should be, not confidence, but mis trust. He mistrusted every officer of the Crown ; not as a man, but as an officer. He objected to the persons of whom this Committee was to be com posed, as of contrary opinions; and many of them, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Secre tary of State for the War Department, &c. as being incapable to attend, from ti.e extent of their other functions. He objected to Sir Arthur Wellesley and Sir John Anstruther, as perst us whose minds were made tip on the subject, and considered them as better calculated to be witnesses than judges. . From a Committee constituted as this was to be, nothing satisfactc ry could be expected. After calling for the elposition, and eulogi,ing Sir P. Francis, whom he described as a prophet who had for many years pro phesied in vain what would happen in regard to India, he concluded his observations with expressing an opi nion, that many of the proposedsMembers were unfit for election, and that the Committee so composed would be altogether unconstitutional. Mr. FULLER entered into a comparison between the East and West Indies ; the former he viewed as represented by Boards of Controul, Courts of Direc tors, &c. while the latter was denied justice, and op pressed. Mr. W. SMITH rose to order.—lt was rather out of order to accuse the House of Commons of injustice and oppression towards the West Indies ; and besldes, it had nothing to do with the present question. LMr. FULLER resumed, and made farther remarks a.i robatory of any reform that could be effected. rvir GRANT spoke in favour of the Committee, which was a Court of Inquiry, and not a Court of Judgment, as the Honourable Gentleman opposite, (Mr. Whitbread) had contended, and on that suppo sition founded all his argument. HOUSE (11' I ell DS, Ti IrREDAY, FEB. 9.3. The Militia 13iil was read a third time and passed. On the moiion ef Lord AUCKLAND, an Address wars or dered to be presenied io his Majesty, playing for Copies of a Letter from Seeretar, Canning to Mr. PinUey, iu Septern % ber last, au s. the allsVer bi Mr. Pinkney. The E.al of BUCKINGHAMSHIRE moved for 1 Copy of tbe Letter of the stl. of September, from Lord Castlereagh to Sir lieSv Dell, yu.ple ; and alsj !or Copies of the Representations or Demand. for Supplie, made by the Portuguese Minister, of the Juntas of Oporto and Al;arve. • The Earl of LIVERPOOL suggested that the first motion was unnecessary, as the paper moved for was included in those, for the production of which orders were already given; to the second be ban'no objection. The Committee of Privileges proceeded on the Banbury Pee rage, all the Judges attending. An objection having been taken by the Attorney-General, •to receiving as evidence some deposi tions respecting the family of William Earl of Banbury, Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY and Mr. Hancltrivz were heard on behalf of the Claimant against the objection ; and after some ob servations from the Duke of Norfolk, the Lord Chancellor, ar.d Lord Erskine, the further proczeding was postponed till Tuesday nest.—adjourned till to-morrow. GOP/. " SIR, " Horse Guards, Feb. 23, 19C9. " I have waited with the greatest anxiety until the Committee, appointed by the House of Commons to inquire into my conduct as Commander in Chief of his Majesty's Army, had closed its examination, and I tcw hope that it will not be deemed improper to ad dress this letter through you to thellouse cf Commons. " I observe, with the deepest concer a n, that in the course of ;his inquiry my name has been coupled with transactions the most criminal and disgraceful, and I must ever regret and lament, that a connection should ever have existed which has thus exposed my character and honour to public animadversion. " With respect to any alledged offences connected with the discharge of my official duties, I do in the most solemn manner, upon my honour, as a Prince, distinctly assert my innocence, not only by denying all - corrupt rarticiration in any of the infamous tran sactions which have appeared in evidence at the Bar of The House of Commons, or any connivance at their existence, but also the slightest knowledge or suspi cion that they existed at all. " hiy consciousne/s of innocency leads me confi dently to hope that the House of Commons will not, upon such evidence as they have heard, adopt any proceedings prejudicial to my honour and charact, r ; but if, upon such testimony as has been adduced against me, the House of Commons can think my in itocence questionable, I claim of their justice that I ~~ CORN DISTILLERY rttomamos. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the order of the day for the House going into a Committee on the Corn Distillery Prohibition Bill ; but before going into the Committee, be moved that it be given as an instruction to the Committee, to admit a clause into the Bill, empowering his Majesty to pro hibit, by proclamation, the distillation of spirits from corn in Ireland, how - and when he should think fit. Mr. BARHAM said, it was far from his intention to offend any one ; but it was his intention neither to give nor take assertions without proof. He then proceeded to speak on the consumption of spirits, and the beneficial effects which woad result from a more general distillation from sugar. Here he gave in a variety of statements and calculations to strew the bad effects cf suffering a distillation from corn to exist, to the extent it does at present. He then spoke of the necessity of manifesting a greater regard for our Co lonies, by opening a more extensive market for their commodities. No one could be ignorant of the low state to which they had been reduced ; they had now, in some measure, recovered thelirnselves, but unless such a measure as that he proposed was pursued, their situation would inevitably become worse than ever. Adverting to the affairs of Ireland, he strongly cen sured the idea of any thing like a combination being in existence ; it was a libel on the generous feelings and the understandings of the people of that country. The people of Ireland, he declared, were not averse to the operation of the Bill; he therefore should move, That an instruction be given to the Committee to ex tend the provisions of the Bill to Ireland. Mr. FOSTER, in reply, said some of his state ments were not founded in fact. He then proceeded to adduce a number of counter statemer ts, tending to prove the Honourable Member mu't have been misinformed. In the course of the last year, one million of barrels of oats had been imported, which was more than Ireland had ever been in the habit of furnishing us_with betore, and England is now sup plikad with 100,000 barrels a month. Ireland_would not wish the distillation from corn to be at an end, as the distillers only could eford them a market for the produce of their land. He then slightly spoke of, the efforts made to suppress clandestine stills, opposed various parts of the Honourable Gentleman's speech, and endeavoured to place, in a luminous point of view, thomany disadvantages that would result from such a measure. Sir J. NEWPORT rose ; he commenced, by in forming the House, that he held in his hand two pe titions from the city of Waterford and town of Clon mel, against the measure of distillation from corn in Ireland. The former city, he observed, was of the first class, as to . commercial importance, in the Sistcr Kingdom ; and the latter was the principal town of the greatest tillage county in that part of the empire. He - Id dilate -- hr tab i lity of the . s h a ll not be condcmeed without trial, or be deprived i Mr. P. MOORE considered the Committee as a, he won. not dilat, upon the respec. 7 of the beneht an . - d yrotection which is afforded to every ! burles q ue, calculated to keep the Public in ignorance ! signatures to both, but must totally disavow any in. with respect to the affairs of India. He agreed gene- , sinuation of their being solicited. The city of Wa- British subject by those sanctions under which alone! rally with Mr. Whitbread, and ascribed all the em- ! terford had no interest whatever in West India af. evidence is received in the ordinary administration of barrassinents of India to the war kindled there by the ' fairs, as to being immediately concerned in them.— the law. I asp, Sir, Your's, polio; of the Marquis of Wellesley. His prihcipal The extensive county of which the petitioning town 44 FREDERICK." I object in rising, however, was to caution the Chance!. was the capital, must above all others serve to shew " The Speaker of the House ot Commons.' for of the Exchequer how he parted with the public that there was a grounded objection to the measure. The SPEAKER put the question, that this Letter money. He had a heavy charge to bring hereafter, It grew more corn than almost any other in Ireland; do ;ie on the table , which w as ag reed to. ►against him and the Lords of the Treasury, for pro- and if it now felt its inadequacy of supply in that The SPEAKER suggested, that there ought to I digality and profusion. . article, it surely was a strong basis of objection to be no delay in taking a copy of this letter for the 1 Mr. G. JOHNSON spoke in favour of this Com- i build upon. Among a variety of arguments, he ad votes, and that the letter ought to be allowed to re- ! mittee, which if it had any fault, it was that of lean- duced the great encouragement which would be given main a short time for that purpose. 1 ing too much towards the East-India Company. He to small liquors, not only as tending to benefit the re- Mr. BANKES observed, that this appeared to I coincided with Mr. Whitbread, in his panegyric on I venue, but also the morals of the people. He observed hi m a case of an extraordinai y nature, and he did , Sir P. Francis, whose name, if he had been in the , that at a particular part of the North, the B a rony o f not recollect any precedents on the subject. ' I House, would have been one o' the first proposed by Trishtown, great latitude had been taken in illicit dis- The SPEAKER said, it uas the course of Par- 1 his Hon. Friend to be upon the Committee. i tillation from corn.. This he insisted on as dangerous !lament that all letters intend( d for the House should I The question was then put ; and after an observa- lin the extreme, so far as it went uv i reate a diversion be opened and read by the Spzaker, a n d co mmuni. J tion from Mr. CREEVEY, who proposed that the names ' from the public revenue ; and highly noxious in pro- 1 cated to the House; if he thought them o f a n ature 1 of all persons holding official situations, should be ex- t moting the establi s h men t o f a grea t er nu mbe r of t en- to be com municated, they were then of course en- , purged from the list, the original Committee, con- ! dezvous for the idle and disaffected. He could not tere d i n the votes and journals. There were cases 1 'sisting of twenty-one persons, was re-appointed. • 1 help thinking, that these private distilleries were in 1 1 , in which the Speaker thought it his duty at once to ' Mr. ADDINGTON, finding his name upon the' some measure countenanced by the Officers of Excise, read letters sent to him. but in graver and more im- list, reminded Gentlemen, that from an unfortunate as they could be easily prevented by the application of portant or doubtful cases, he would hesitate and circumstance which happened to him twelve months eff e ct i ve measures, which the Government had in put the question to the House , and the House i a go, he had been precluded from attending to his 7 their power to make use of. After a great deal of would recollect, that lie had not read this till he bad parliamentary duties. He would be happy to do all common-place statement, he begged leave to, call the ta k en the pleasure of the House, and mentioned that lay in his power, by attending this Cummittee, attention of the House to the eonditic nof the linen what the letter related to. He had als o p u t th e ques- but was afraid he would not be able to give to it all manufacturers in the North of Ireland, who were al tion here, whether the letter should lie on the table, i the time and attention it required. , most all unemployed in consequence of the dearness t h oug h the ordinary course was to lay them oh the Mr. DUNDAS assured the Hon. Gentleman that .of flax. Such a measure as would raise the price of table at once. He had also mentioned, owing to j the attendance would not be so incessant as it for- corn must certainly a ff ect t h em most s e ns ibly ; an d suggestions from the right and left, that it would be . merly was. , not only that class ofrnanufacturers, but all the trades convenient that, in such a case, no delay should k.iie 1 Mr. CREEVEY, in consequence of his notice, • men dependent on the pttisress of building, must feel ' p l ace in • making a copy for the votes. If it was the , rose to move for the prochictiien of the Exposition, the oppressive consequence* of such a me a s u r e, parti. leisure of the House that it s ho u ld remain , t h at 1 whi c h had been laid before the last Committee, cularly now, when the scarcity of timberhas suspended p , .. . -was another point- The House would dispose of it whkb he considered as calculated to give more every exertion in that line. He not only was averse as they pleased , information than the Re p ort o f the Committee. In to the measure, from such considerations as these, but EAST fs.'DIES. order to shew the grounds for this impressicak on his also from conceiving that it tended to a breach of the Mr. move the appointment of a mind, he Would read certain passages from the paper. - Articles of Union. The Honour a bl e B arone t sa id DUNDAS rose to Ilwi' ) 1 I much on .the gloomy prospect of the ensuing h ar vest in this Country;- and reptOsented Ireland, if did pasiiis supplies adequj te to the purpc•se, as c a . pable of remedying the sasters to b 4 apprehcr.‘!,,d in consequence of dig ,severe. inundations °petal! against the possibility' of early sowing. Tl2cl - 4 - ' Baronet concluded an able statement by reT:6ll., that the petitions be read. Mr. FOSTER replied at some length, and said that he objected not to the Waterford petition frcm. any other motive than that the Mayor in his reqi is: tion gave no more than three or four hours notice. General MATTHEW acknowledged the re,p( tability of the Clonmel petition, but could not thinl that it had...an exclusive right beyond the fourteen fifteen other towns in the saute cougj which sup. • ported it. Mr. W. SMITH, in an elaborate speech, obj, ;c i,„, 3 to the measure. Sir A. WELLESLEY replied. Mr. MARRIATT represented the great adva-. tages which would accrue from distillatiog from gar. In consequence of the illicit practice d'i'stillation, he could not help observing that would be a second Dunkirk, and perhaps supply coast of England with this contrabandarticie, , as ever was suplelied through the medium of Jersey cr Guernsey. He represented that the Liverpool and London prices of sugar «ere unusually low, a circutc stance which was highly detrimental -to our colonial interests, and that this may be remedied by the pro- - . - hibition being extended to Ireland. Mr. M'NAGHTEN avowed his determination. to - . vote for the prohibition. Mr. ELLIS, at some length, though without any addition to preceding arguments, expressed himself favour of the prohibition. Mr; WESTERN deprecated the interference Parliament so widely in Agricultural concerns, as to vest any such powers of continuation or di.icontinua tion ad libitum, in the Privy Council. Mr. WILBERFORCE objected on the same . grounds. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, in reply to observations from the other side, remarked, that the Privy Council by possessing such powers could in time of need apply them as well in putting the pro hibition in force, as they now did in suspending is he combated very ably what had been said as to !It commitment of a breach in the act of union. . Lord A. HAMILTON followed. The main pot in his reply was, that the Corn Distillation in Ireland would materially affect the western coast of Scotia: •i, which was accustomed to receive supplies from the country, Colonel LONGFIELD and Sir JAMES lIALL sroke. The House then divided on the clause,-For it ,Against it 37.—Majority 3. The House resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill, when the separate clauses were severidiy di:- cussed.—The Report was ordered to be receive& c morrow.—Adjourned at Two o'Clock. LIST OF THE MINORITY WHO DIVIDED IN ,FAVOUR OF LORD HENRY PETTY'S MOTION, ON TUESDAY NIGHT. " That the Covention concluded at Cintra on the noth of August, ISOB, and the i<•i:aritime Convention coixlud oa . the Tagus, on the tril of September, 1808, appear to this 1-lou , e to have disappointed the hopes and expectations of the Nation." Nantet. Whet e dozen Lloyd, Sir E. Beaurmrii Lyttleton,Hon.W.H.Worccer . t NPOonald,J. Newcastle-and-L. Madocks, W. A. Boston - Mahon, Viscount 1:1:11 Maitland, G. Lestwithid Martin, H. Kinsale Matthew, Hon. M. Tipperary Maule, Hon, W. Forfar Maxwell, W. Selkirk, &c. hlexborough, Earl of Lincoln. Milbanke, Sir R. Durham Miller, Sir T. Portsmanit Mills, C. • Warwick Mills; W. Loveutry Milner, Sir W. York Milton, Viscount Yorkshire Moore, P. • Covmtry Morpeth, Vis. Caliberland Mosley, Sir 0. Wincheisea - Mostyo, Sir T . Hint Neville, lion. it. Buckingham islewport,R.H. SirJ. Waterford Nos, D. Banbury Noithey, W. Newport O'Callaghan, James Tregony O'Hara, Charles , ;Alp,* Ossulston, Lord Knaresboro Percy, Earl Nortliiiiiii:erland Petty, Lord H. Caroellord Pigott, Sir A. Ar:cW,..l Pole, Sir C. M. Flyn ca.lt Pensonby, Hon. F. K:lke.7ny 1 0 isi nby, R. H. G. Tavish., - ;.-: Porch, sta., Lord Cricklade. l'rittie, Hon. F. A. Tippera: y Pyro, F. Iseeltori Quin, Hon. W. Limerick Ridley, Sir M. . Newcastle Romily, Sir S. - Warehant Russell, Lord Wm. Tavistock St. Aubm, Sir J. Helstone S:udarriore, R. P. Hereford Sell iet, S r J. Hertford S carpe, Rd. Castle Rising S ielly, H. Lew, a S'ielly, T. Shoreham Shipl y. W. Flint Simp o I, G. Maileotie Smitl , I. Ntit . ; ingliani Smiti , -l. Leic,-,t, 7 Smiti , W . I`crwic.:l Smirl , G. V eudover Sta: ley, Lard Pres . o.i Syr. monds, T. P. 11.-telehl Talbt t, R. W. Duhli.i Tarletun, r. Liverpool Taylor, F. C uterbu. y Taylor, M. A. ti. C 3 :, .r Tempest, Sir H. V. Der; . ant Temple, Earl liad.s Tenvietown,/ .• I Bury St. f.. Lord Tracey, C. H. l'ewkohari Tierney, Rt. lion. G. Fail tIl Tighe, W. * - Wicklow Vansittart, R. H. N. Old Saru 1 Vernon, G. V. Litchfield Walpole, Hon. G. Dcmgarm , Vi'ard, Hon. J. W:!rch..lrt Warrender, Sir G. Haddiu;,:on Western, C. C. ki.,i , l -a Whitbread, S. Fedor. , Williams 0. N'a :.%Ir Williams, Sir R. Carliary,:l Windham, Rt.? Higl:ain Hon. W. S rers Wynne, Sir W. W. .1)c!;:. '7 Wynne, C. W. Molagomo y Names. Where chasm Abercrombie, Hon. J. Midhurst Adam, W. Kincardine Adams, C. Weymouth Xdding:on, R.H. J.H. Harwich Afar, E. F. Sudbury Allan, A. Berwick Al; laorpe, Vis. Northaturten Anson, G. Litchfield Antonie ' W. L. - Bedford S,r 5. H. Norfolk Aubruy s Sir J. Aldborough Barham, G. F. Stockbridge Barin , z, A. TAnton Baring, T. ' • Wycornb'e Bastard, J. P. .Devon Bathurst, Rt. Hon. C. Bristol Bradshaw, Hon: A, C. Fioniton &Aden, J. . Launceston Brand, T. Co. Hertford B Jnc, G. Middlesex Calcraft, J. Rochester Caiv , r:, Nich. Hertford Cocks, James : Reigate Combe, H. C. • Lund. n Craig, J. Cart ickfergus Creevey, Thos. Thetford Cuthbert, J. R. Appleby Colborne, N. W. R. Appleby Cooke, B. Matron Daly, Rt. Hon. D. B. Galway Dundas, Hon. C. L. Richmond Dundas, Hon. R. L. Malton Dundas, Hon L. Richmond Eden, Hon. W. F. Woodstock Egerton, J. Chester I lliot, Rt. 11. W. Peterborotlgh Estcourt, T. G. Devizes Euston (Earl of) Univ. of Cain. &Howes, Hon. N. Ando% er Ferguson, Gen. K irkcaldy, Fitzgerald, Lord Kildare Fitzgerald, R. H. M. Kerry Fitzpatrick, R. H. R. Bedford Folkes, Sir M. B. King's Lynn Folkstone, Visc. New Earurn Frankland, Wm. 'Think Freemantle,W.H.Dornock,&c. Gower, Earl St. Mawes Grattan, R. H. H. Dublin Giles, D. St. Alban's Creenhill, Robert 'lshirsk Grenfell, P. Marlow Giddy, D. Bodmin Grosvaior, T. Chester Hall, Sir J. St. Michael Halsey, Joseph St. Alban's Herbert, P. A. Kerry Hibbert, G. Seaford Hobhouse, B. Honiton Howard, H. Gloucestcr Howard, Hon. W. Morpeth Howarth, H. Eversham Hughes, W. L. Wallingford Hume, W. H. Wicklow Hurst, R. Steyning, Hussey Aylesbury Hutchinson, Hon. C. H. Cork Jackson, John Dover Keck, G. A. L. I.eicester K nsington, Ld. Haverfordw. Knapp, G. Abingdon Knox, H. a. T. Tyrone Lamle. Hon. W. Portarlington Langton, W. G. Tregony Latouche, J. Leitrim Lateuche, R. Kildare Leach, J. ' Seaford Lefevre, C. S. Reading Lemon, Sir W. - Cornwall Lewis, Colond Truro Total - 15 County ?blethers 3S—Citl ; including Teller& do. lti—University do. ► ,1 • t Aili sr Sr 4r sr mi