Star. — London, England, 1807-11-13 00:00:00

LAIV IivTALLIGANCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, NOV. x 2. OPERA HOUSE. Mr. Fox Bt ANC's laid, he was to have the honour' of addreffit g the Omit on the moti-n of Mr. Hart, for the removal f Mr. Taylor from the management of the Opera Houle. Mr. Corti}, Mr. L'wten, and Mr. Palmer, were trufleec in this cafe. But the affidavit which had been lately filed was fo long, that it required time to pet ufe it, therefore he begged time till T hut fday next. LORD CH AN C LOR —" You fhnuld rev - die& Gen tlemen, that in the cafe of Drury-lane Theatre, i-uch of what was done, was done by confent ; and could not have been done without confent ; for it was in the ablence tif a great number of parties interefitd in the queilion ; arid it is a quefiifin whether all the perfons who ate Box Proprietors—ltenters—all the Ladies and Gentlemen inierefled in the property, of the management of the Opera honk, &mild not be made parties. That is for your confideration." Mr. H A RT.••••-" 1 believe, my Lord, we than not 11.ve to encounter much difficulty on that account, bec.itife the intereil of molt of the parties will be fully reprefented by the Trufiees, Mr. Conk Mr. Lowten, and Mr. Palmer." Lf•RD CHANCELLOR That may be, and then the quetlion is, whether the Cfflui que truji may not file another Bill." Mr. IticHARDs." When this motion is made, your Lordfhip will not, 1 believe, find much difficulty in difpofing of it." LORD CruscELLPlt.----" If any objzaion had been taken for want of parties in the Drolly-lane Theatre cafe, then all the Mortgagee., Rerverf, and other perfems interelted in the hbjeCl, muff have been made parties ; and Co it may be in the prefent cafe ; and if decilion of the malltr may become im praelicable." A Gentleman among the Solicitors, affured his Lordfhip there was no fimilarity in the prelim cafe and that of Denry-lane Theatre. LORD CHANCELLOR--" YOU will exeufe me, Mr. MILLS, for not knowing the difference between them, for I am not an Opera attendant." Cafe ordered to :Lind over until Thurfday next. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. NOV. 11. CRIMINAL INPIRMATIoN. The ATTORNEY GENERAL applied for a Rule to thew caufe why a criminal information fhonld not be filed againfi George Francis Stuart, alias Ceunr Stuart, for a fcandalous libel upon Major James. — The pamphlet the Learned Counfel held in his hand, was intended as an attack upon thole perfons who were once concerned in, or countenanced the exceffts cammitted during the French Revolution. Among many others, it contained a defeription of an int!ivi dual under the title of " Marat }heel ;" and the author, under this affumed name, evidently meant to defignate Major James, who held a cnmmiffion in one of his Majetty's corps of Royal Artillery. In page 43 of this publictrion, the libel complained of was to be found, wheli Sir V. Grass read to their Lordfhips. It Hated, that Marat Flacci endeavoured to conceal the place of his birth, and the parents by whom he was cherifhed; but that he would be a lofer by it, even if he defeended from the lowell me chanic ; for his name deferved to be placed with thofe of a French Damiens, or an Englith linathan Wild. Although born a beggar, he had grown rich without commerce or honelly ; and although a noted leveller, yet neverthelefs he had received a commit . - fion from an Engin Monarch. Without having a claim to the title of a Gentleman, he was introduced to the tables of the firft Noblemen. It proceeded to fay, that Flacci was indebted for the wealth he en jnyed, to the hal - eft condufl, to robbery and plunder 1 1 in France, and to unfair gambling in England. He would not now have been in exillence, had it not been 1. T an innate meanrefs in his charafter, which prevented him from fuffering with his accomplices abroad. The fame quality had been his recommen daticn to titled folly and deranged grandeur : he began by licking the dolt tiff the feet of the great, and anfwered purp les by tithing hirnicit to the time. The N. , Ciem.tit, whole recommendation had made Lim a C mmander. and initiated him into the reacts of the Sate, tilt; him, at the firli inter. view, that he was an infamons villain. The ATTORNEY GENERAL continued, and laid, that there v. e , e other t bfervazions upon the fame perfon ; and, 1... r the purpefe of (hewing that the profecutor, 'Major James, was the perfon here in tended to be dtpiaed, he held in his hand the curter pondence of different perfons upon the fubjeft, and am , ngft them n as one, in the French language, from the Defendant, olferving, refpeaing Major James and others, that they would ruin him, but he would ruin them—"Cas voudrcit me padre, mairje les perderai." Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—" In this Work, does the Author allude to the Kingdom of England ?" Mr. Gartativ, on the fame fide with Sir V. Grass, replied, that in this publication the Author imagined himfelf to be in a dream, and fuppofed that thi' coun try was in the poffeflion of Francis I. He pi4lured, in this fuppofed vifion, that England was in a Rate of revolution, and then defcribed all the perfons he made aCtors in the fcene. The Av-roesev Gan Ettal. added, that there was no doubt but that fuch was the fa& The Author fancied a revolution, and, in defcribing the charafters of his dramatis perfons, among them was the fcanda 1 at, libel he had read. The C , urt enquired, whether there was any evi dence to {hew that the perton alluded to under the title of Marat Flacci was intended to reprefent the prfecutor The ATTORNSY GENERAL anfwered, that there could be no doubt as to that WI; for the author had fail that Marat Flacci was Grand Mailer of the Ord. stance, in his fuppofed dream, when in truth Major James did held a fituation of milt in the Ordnance Office. Betides that, Mr. Stuart had termed Arlo le ftreet, where the pp fecutor refided, Marat Itreet, plainly thewiag who was intended. The Learned Counfel Lkewife read feversl affidavits, particularly one from a Mr. J mes, who-deputed to a converration with the Defendant, when the latter obfer Ted to him that there were already too marl Jacobins in the country , an d f e in t r t them held 11111.60ns where they could do much mifchief He could point out a man be faid, who bore a ronfidtrable rank in the army, end whr was entrulted in the confideritia:strairs ) of the kingdom—islainti_aMembei of the Munici palitiss of Paris during sbe.laerrors,,of gse, .10th o 11.,ugnc4, and he hinifelf (the Defendant), hid ,(een hint . mating yifiti in that 'city. He Gke wife'Taidi..thar bkisid been proferibed . Ma k %nil added that he had no reafon to conceal this man, his name was Major James. He concluded by obferving, that the profecutor knew him perfedly well, and the public fhonld loon be made acquainted with Major James's charader. He was not a Britilh fubjed, but born at Liege. When Mr. Jones afterwards again met the Defendant, the fame affertions were repeated. Lord ELLENBOROUGH- 14 Does any body fay, that upon reading this libel, they Ihuuld underaand it to mean Major James ?" Mr. Gartauw--46 Yes, my Lord, Major James (wears it himfeif." Lord ELLENDOII.OI.IGH" Otherwife, it Teems fo los,fe and unapplied that we might have fome diffi cuby." Mr. GARROW.-..." Your Lordllip will fee that there are other charaders alluded to in the fame way, where Englilh names are changed into a foreign form, (omething like the original.—Rule granted. THE KING V. JOSEPH (WENT. Mr. GARROW (hewed caufe againft a Rule obtain ed in this cafe, which was to quafh a conviaion made by the Juflices at a Qstarter Seffinns at Guildford, by which older it was adjudged that a woman nam ed Elizabeth Hendrick, was delivered of a baflard child, of which the Defendant was the father. That there was an expence incid:nt thereto, defrayed by the parifh of Newington, therefore the Defendant was adjudged to pay t tl. 6s. 6d. for the fuflenance of the child, and for the inlyingrof the mother ; and alfo to pay t al. the coils of the parifh in the litiga tion which took place. To this order there were two objeaions, firft, that there was not fufficient evidence of the birth of the child in the pat ifh ; and, fecondly, that the inflicts at Szffions had no power to award cofts. Mr. Garrow contended that the order wZs right in both refpeas, and quoted feveral authori• . . ties in fupport of his argument. Mr. Lai: as, on the contrary, maintained, that the order was . bad, as the child was not fufficiently well adjudged to have been burn in the parifh. He alfo quoted the flatute of the 18th of Eliz. cap. 3, fee. 2. and that of the 3d of Charles 11. to (hew that in no fuch cafes could Jullices award coils. Lord Et LEN BnR OUG H and the Court held that the father was bound to fupport the child. The order was therefore qualhed in regard to coils, but affirmed in refpea to the req. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, NOV. 11. DONNIILLY V. SIR 1401 , 41 POPHAM. Serjeant. BAILEY moved the Court for a new trial. The circumllances of the cafe are well known to the public. Sir Home Popham, after the capture of Buenos Ayres, fent the greater part of the fpecie which was captured home by Captain Donnelly's (hip. If Sir Home Popham had been a Flag Officer, he would have been entitled to a third of the freight AS well as to an eighth of the prize money ; but it had been held at the tall trial, that he was not a Flag Officer at that time, and therefore was not entitled. Sir Home Popham had been appointed a Commo dore by the Admiralty, but there was no Captain appointed under him. He, however, thought it proper to appoint a Captain under him, which ap pointment he flill hbped to have confirmed. The whole point, as to the proportion of prize money to which he was entitled, and as to the freight, depen ded upon whether he was or was not a Flag Officer? From the evidence, it appeared that the point which determined what Commodore fhauld be confidered a Flag Officer, was this, that every Commodore hay. ing a Captain under him, was a Flag Officer. The defendant, Sir Home Popham, had at the time of the capture a Captain under him, but it was a Captain whom, from the exigency, he had himfelf appointed, and who had not at the time of the trial been con firmed by the Admiralty. The money had at firll been paid over by the plaintiff to the defendant, on the fupporri oi that he was a Flag Officer, and there fore entitled to it ; but when he was advifed that the defendant wag rot a Flag Officer, he brought his anion, and fucceeded on the trial. The defendant had no objeCtion to pay over the money ds bene that is, until it could be finally determined who was entitled to it. If, however, the appointment of Cap tain made by Sir Home Popham fhnuld now be approved of and confirmed by the Admiralty, he trotted it would appear to the Court that the defen dant would be entitled. At the time of the trial it was listed that proceedings were then depending before the Privy Council on the fubjea. • The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE-" Brother Bailey, how could I, lilting in a Court of Law at Ai a Prius, take notice of what then was going for ward in the Privy Council ? The evidence of many moll refpeClable Officers was clear, that a Commodore was not a Flag Officer unlefs he had a Captain under him. Admiral Rainier had been in both fituations—he had been a Commodore without a Captain under him, and with one. When he had not a Captain under him, he did not (hare as a Flag Officer, and when he had he did. By his Majefly's Proclamation, the proportion of prize money is diftributed ; the flag officers are emit led to a larger (hare ; but by the evidence which was adduced at the trial, it appeared to me clear, that Sir Home Popham was not a flag officer." Mr. Serjeant BAILEY (till contended, that as Sir Home bad a Captain under him at the time of the capture, even although that Captain was of his own , appointment, yet if that appointment thould not be confirmed, the confirmation of it would make :he ori ginal appointment good ab initio, and leave the defen dant entitled to the full (hare of a flag officer. The LORD CHIEF Jusrica Paid, that even if the Admiralty were now to confirm the appointment which Sir Home Popham had made ola Captain, the Court were of opinion, that loch confirmation would not divell the plaintiff of the right which had been vetted in him, and would not be a fufficient ground for grantit,g a new trial. As to his own opinion, he tfi:iught it would be a very bad precedent in the navy, and that if inch fubfequent confirmation could altar the ditlribution of prize money, every Commodore would appoint his Captain' under him, and then try his inter ett, or take his chance of getting that up- I I pointment afterwards ratified. At the trial however, and after the evidence given, it was imp. ffible to confider Sir Home Popham as a flag officer. The quctlion was fo clear that it would not admit of an argument.—Role refuted. ~ ~, 'f,4 7 4 _.llll • - ' , COCKPIT WRITOTALL,./R)V. sa. Before the molt Noble and Right Honourable the I Lords C , mmidinners of Appeali in Prize Caufes Manhattan, l.afker wafter.—(An appeal from the Vice Achill , raftit Court ar Bennuda.)-•-•Thls 114, under American colours, failed from Ncw York, laden with flour and fpccie, in June amt. for Batavia, where the fame was landed, and a valuable cargo of Bataviaa produce was taken on board, confiding of fugar, coffee, pepper, nutmegs, cloves, mace, and various other articles, with which the was returning to New York. when be was captured by his Majefty's Soap Bay, W. H. Byam, Efq. Commander, and carried to the Bland of Bermuda. In this cafe, an appeal was to terpored on behalf of the captors, who contended. by their Coun • fel, that the tranfaelion was extremely furpicious ; the hands in • ' fufficient for carrying it into execution ; and the proofs of pro perty defedlive —Their Lordthips, after hearing the claimant's Counfel, affirmed the fentence of the Court below by reaming the Chip and cargo. The Amfterdaut Packet, Smith maller.—(Ao appeal from the Vice Admiralty Court at Nova Scotia.)—This American fhip,laden with a valuable cargo of fugar, coffee, pepper, fpices, and other merchandize, and bound therewith from Batavia to Philadelphia, was, in the profecution of fuch voyage„,4eized oil the Lath of July, tBot. by his Majefty's Hoop of war Driver, Robert Simp fon, Efq. Commander, and carried to Halifax in Nova Scotia, where the Wird proceedings were inßituted, and the (hip; cargo; and private adventures, were finally condemned. On behalf of the captor: it was ftrenuoufly contended, that this was a coluura• We and fraudulent tranfaction, and the parties being affeeted with that fraud, they had forf,i , ed the indukterce of any further proof. On the part of the claimants, it was fubrnitted, that the property was fufficiently proved by the necelfary documents and Chip's pa pers, and trufted, that their Lordthips would be of opinion. that the (hip and cargo were fit for immediate reftoration. Their Lordfhips affirmed the fentence of the Court below, as far as it went to condemn the (hip and cargo, but reltored the private adventures. ADMIRALTY COURT', DOCTORS' COMMONS. WFDPIESDAY, NOVEMSER I I. • This day, the Right Hon. Sir WILLIAM SCOTT proceeded to the adjudication of the following cafes: Le Bon Adventure, Lamournier matter—This queftion ofjoint capture was further argued this day on the point of law.--(See Report of the 4th inftant )—After Which, the Court, in delivering its opinion, ohferved. that the imputation of delay in the Court not coming fooner to a final determination, was in a great degree chargeable to the parties thennfelves; and. after recapitulating the evidence on both fides, and alfo particularly obferving upon the charge alledged, of a fraudulent fuppreffion of a fignal, which it was the duty of the Captain of his Majefty's (hip Albion to have made to the fleet, when his Chip was within fignal diltance, (of which fad the Court laid there was not a tittle of evidence to be f..utad) it was clearly of opinion, that the fleet had not fupported the claim of joint capture, and pronounced, that the Albion and Ardent were the only (hips entitled to (hare in the prize. Alla, De Souza mafter.—This Porrogu_fe !hip, laden with a very valuable cargo of wine and brandy, was bound an a voyage front Lam to Corunna, and it was contended, that wine and brandy going to an enemy's port, was to be con fidered, agreeable to the ancient pradice of the Court, as articles of a contraband na ture, hut independent of that, the (hip was going on a contir eons voyage with rcfped to the cargo, and therefore liable to cot ilia tion. 'The Court, after hearing the Counfel on behalf of the claimants, reftored the (hip, but pronounced againft the freight and expences, and condemned the cargo. Lord Vernon.—ln this cafe, the fhip and cargo were rettored, on the payment of the captor's expellees. Truth, Waldo natter..—This was an American valet, with a cargo of wine Further proof was required in this cafe. • I Viana mafter.—ln the cafe of this Portuguefe (hip, further proof was alfo required. Ann, Bradford Mlafter.—This Chip was failing miter American colours, with a cargo of various merchandize, on a v, yage from Leghorn, deftined to London. Ship and cargo teßored, ou the payment of the captor's expences. The Peggy —ibis was alfo an American veffel, and it was con tended that (he was liable to confifeadon, on the ground of car rying contraband articles, and breach of blockade. Further proof was required of the nature and quantity of contraband articles. Furao, De Cofta mafter.—This was a Portuguefe 'hal, laden with various merchandize, and going from Portugal to Name. In this cafe the vast was condemned, and :he cargo di reeled to ttaud Over. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. Henry Barnet, James Smith, and Thos. Bonner, of Chippenham, Wilts, timber merchants. Augult 19, 2807. William Maffey, of Neweaßle undcr-Lyme, and William Robin fon, of the Gorfe, GnofaU,Staffortillaire, millers. Oetober 27, 18°7. Thomas Reed and Jofeph Allen Peacock, of Bifhopfpte Without, cheefemongers. October 2, iBO7. William Pouk er and Thomas Ray. of Upper Thame- Rivet, whok fale ftationers. November 4, 1807. John Frith and John Froggiett. November 5, t 807. James Harris and John Carr, of Coventry, Slag manufadlurers.— July 22, t 305. Jonas Nuttall and Simon Gudgeon, of Liverpool, printers, will be diffolved—November 14, 1807. John Startin, Samuel Startin, and James Startin, of Birmingham, merchants, fo far as refpetits the Paid Samuel Startin. Novem- her 4, iBo7. William Hal! and John Herfant, of Moorfielda, upholiterers and arpraifera. November 9, tB-)7. DIVIDENDS. Nov. t 4. John Walford, late of Rcd Lion -fquare, Middlcrex, apo. cary and druggilt, at one, at OuildhalL Nov. to. Edward Hi'dor Strange, of Frant, Suffra, grocer, at one' at Guildhall, London. Nov. to. William Knight, of Tuubridge Wells, Kent, banker, at onc, at Guildhall, London. Nov. to. William Swift, of Sun pee, Bifhopigate ftreet, London, trunk• maker, at one, at Guildhall. Nov. to. Francis Forbes, Ire of Blackman-ftrat, Southwark, • chymift and droggift, at one, at Guildhall. Nov. to. Henry Drewat, of the Glazier? Arm; Mansfield ftreet, Southwark, vidualler, at twelve, artluildhall. Nov. to. Joseph Wilfon, late of elle Strand, but now of St George's Fields, Surrey. umbrella maker, at one, at Guildhall Nov. 14. John Ball, of Hatherfctt. Norfolk, engineer, at one, at Guildhall, London. Nov. to. James Sebaftian Willimott, of Stamford, Lincolnihire, linen draper, at one. at Guildhall. London. Nov. to. William Stokes. late of Old Broad-ftreet, London, mer chant, at one, at Guildhall. Nov. to. Andrew Riddell and Robert Riddell, of High-ftreet, Borough, Surrey, copartners, grocers and tea dealers, at one, at Guildhall. London Nov. so. William Purdy, of Mark lane, London, broker, at one, at Guildhall Nov 14. John Manners, Isle of Parlbment.ftreet, Middiefez, furgcon and apothecary, a: one, at Guildhall. Nov. 14. john Boatman, of Headcorn, Kent, timber-merchant, at one, at Guildhall. Nov. 14. 4euhin Allen, of High Wycomb, Bucks, carrier, at one, at Guildhall, London. Nov. to. George Wilke and Edward Dizey, hte of Wardrobe place, Dt)dor's Commons, hit now of Piccadilly, opticians and copartners, at one, at Guildhall. Nov 14. William Hodgfon, of the Strand, Mlddlefez, ftationer, at one, at Guildhall. Nov. 14. William Charles Thomas, of Nicholas-lane, London, merchant. at one, at Guildhall. Nov. to. Bron head, of Stamford. Lincolnlbire, ironmon ger, at eleven, at the George Inn, Stamford Baron. Nov. t 4. Thomas William, of iiillingfgate, London, merchant, at onc, at Guildhall. - Nov. a+ Henry Appleton and John Appleton, of Fenchurch ftreet, 'Anion, merchants, at ten, at Guildhall Nov. la. Michael M'Evoy, of Piccadilly, Mieldkfez, wine and liquor-merchant. at one, at G ulidhall. Dec. 5. Archibald Mackeari, late of Winchefter-ftreet, Loudon, merchant, nt twelve, at Guildhall. MARitlfiD. Monday fe'nnight, Thomas Croft, Printer of the Preßon jour nal, to Mifs Hannah Stoekdale, daughter of the late Rev. William Stoohdale, of Samlefbury. DIRD. Lately. aged 78, Mr. Rola, printer, Carmarthezt. On the 4th Nov. Mrs Ann Cameron. wife of Lion Donald Cameron of the scth (or Aberdeentlaire Militia). HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE i U•ISIORRO' Moi in so album afrer Alteraoo4 a 4% io/na:es suer B UTLER'S .RESTORATIVE I:3OTH-POW. DER, here offered to the life of the Puitiic atl:trge, was to the circle of Dr. P. H. Dimftlales particular acquak.unce, and the Nobility and Gentry, his patients. and h virtues jußly appreeln ed ; bit a certain delicacy prevented him from publicly this preparation. Mr. Butler has point into pal( Mott of the origintl recipe, aral he begs to :nitre thole of ik ed with dcraytal or offea • uire teeth and gum; tits( they may rely on ks sad reftot• alive quality—a truifai of which any one may be eatvirecd, by a fair and candid trial of one boz. Of the properties of this Tooth Powder. its deter five property Is juft fulbeient to clear &tray thorn dettruclive particles of acid which generally adhere to the gun's, and in the interftices of the teeth, without injuring the furfice of either. healing forenefs in the former, and promoting a new ena mel of pearly whiteners, where it Ins been irjured or corroded o n the latter. It has a pleafant and agreeable odour and is withal N prrfeetly innocent, that it may be eaten without ritly. There oiftiuguithing charaderittics of its fanative effeds atd hperiwity, have procured it the unbound e d approbation of the (keo, the Princellcs, the lienprefa of Risflia, the Duetiellis of York, dcdf or g, Gordon, Leeds, Rutl an d, and moth of the Englith and fOreigu No bility, many of whom recommend it with admiration, as a wed fary appendage tq the Wilet, and indeed they do bur common jut. tice herein. firce it imparts a firinners and beautif ul rednets to the gums ,to the breath the molt deka able fwerettela at.l. if tiled Mt, ltantly as dirceled, will render the teeth firm and white, and ple.„ vent the tooth acts from returning to thole who have beta liable to its molt baneful effeets. Prepared and fold wholcfale and retail by Mr. Butler, Nu. 4. Clicaptide. comer of Paternoth r-row, London, and of moll cow: try Medicine Venders and Perfumers, ln boats at as. 9d. each.. Of whom may be bad, butler's improved Silver-wired I with- Bret fhts, price is, each. • gill YU ULIC ADVAN l'Atili. I'HE advantage the public mutt always derive from regularly educated proftifional men direding alma ex clufively their ftudlrs to one species of malady, was never more c•ciarly demonftrated than by the unexampled fuccefs which has attended the administration of their new remedy, and the extra. ordinary cures it has performed. For a long feriesof years, Mars CUel RIR and Co. Surgeon.% formerly in his Majefty's ferviee, have made the Venereal Difeafe the particular objed of their la. ere ftfgation . and arc hinny in having discovered a medicine Cups rice to mercury in the cure of that complaint—it is fufficient obferve that the crffeets of this remedy are diametrically oppofite thofe of rnereury,for though it completely eradicates every vett* of the virus, in irs molt confirmed stages, yet it does not in tit leaft injure the conftitution—on the contrary, it renovates th e f y 6, tem in all its natural fundtione, promotes appetite, and facilitate digeilion—thus inftesd of re . 4 tieing a Strong and vigorous con ftita. don to the frightful condition that mercury does, %Mot only pre. lines that conftitution in it% primitive state, but re.ftores a wig and debilitated one to its natural ftrengtb and vigour. Numberlefs instances are on recent record of the fuperior dimly of this Medicine, its inherent and Ipecific virtues adting as a pr. petual eqrreetive to bodily delsility, whether proceeding he. an racers of con j ugal or illicit pleafure, or irons the awe itifiduour, though not left dab-naive indulgence of incaa. &sus youth of ince, in a certain pernicious habit. Amid' the melancholy variety of diforders which are the confequeme of this folitary vice, there are none more al:Hiding than that diftreffing (Lee or debility and deficiency, which prevents or embitters the nsa. trimonial Rate ; the unhappy fame broods over his misfortune, aftranied to leek relief, until be is reduced to fueb a Rate of weak. refs as to render life oppreffivd Tofueh perfons it mull be at:ca roling refteetion, to know that they may now, by a new infallible mode of treatment, be reftored to that great& of all human ings.aftroag, manly. and vigorous conftitution. In all cafes of debility , deficiency, from whatever Wire aria% as well as in every fpecees at venereal infedlion, Mars Currie and Co. may be confulted by patient% of either fez, with the greateft fecrecy and honour, at their honk, No. soy, Hatton Garden. Letters from the Country (paft paid) including a bank ncee, will have the peccary medicine and advice fart to any part of the Kingdom. No toy, Hattie Garden. ACANDID examination ot Profeffinnal Preten. hosts is only to he feared by him who Is confeious of lucky. Tbc proleffioual pretenfions of Mr. BRIE are limply tbefe—that he is a Member ut the College of Surgeons, and a replarly educated as any Phyfician or Surgeon in London ; tha it has been his choice ta confine his pradtice to Venereal Cr.w plaints and Deti:dy, and that in the treatment of there complaints, for the daft fourteen years, of which he has refided eleven years in Arund.l area, his pradtice has been more eminently fitectfiful than that of any other Surgeon in the fame breach. He reams that illiterate • ten, under FICTITIMS so astes,bave copied his al vertifanents nearly word for word, but the injury to the public may be prevented by a careful inquiry for the certilleatu which they pretend to poffefs, and an accurate eisthination of the lift of Surgeons, which is &usually publifhed at the College in Lincoln's. inn• Field& No difeafes are felt with greater poignancy by the (utterer than thofe which are =atoned by his own imprudence, and in no cafes of confultation is liberality of education more deficable is the profefror, than where the molt urtbounded confidence is placed and the mutt inviolable fecreey expeeted. On terms plainly fisted on the firft interview, or in anfwer to letters containing a Bank -note, Mr. Bret offers rettoration of health in all Venereal Complaints, and in all cafes of Debility, whether arifing from the habits of inconfiderate yotith, long refl. dente in warm climates.or the prevalont gaieties or a falionable life —No. act, Arundel. ftreet, S rand, November 10,1807. I N prJtetEng myfelf a regularly educatedMenaher of the College of Surgeons, I think it incumbent on me to fignify that my Diploma from the College of Surgeons in London, as well as Certifiates from the Hofpitals, and various profanes um!er whom I Rudiod Phyfic. Surgery and Midwifery, have been toe years placed in one of my parlours, open to the infreetion of any perfon who happens to be there, or is defirous of fuch examination. Thirteen years I have refired all other pradtiee for the Roily and treatment of Venereal Complaints and Debility—but it was not till I had experience as an Army Surgeon and general Praftl• tioner, that I thought myfelfjoßified in the fete lion of this pecu liar branch. The concentrated force of the human Intelled when direeted to a particular point, mutt acquire fuperiorty within the circle of its owls aetion, and kmg continued fuccefs is a decided proof that my efforts have not ben lers beneficial to others than advantageous to m yf~lf. The diftrefa aad the rifery which arifes from a certain dettrae tive habit fo pernicious to Wu:union have been frequently pow trayed by the moralirta of the age ; but it is the duty of every Ptadtitioner, when called upon, to relieve fuch (ufferings by me dical affittance, and it is the acquirement of my exclufsve expe rience in this line to offer, in every inch cafe, a fate and cert..* re-eitablilhment.—ln flight cafes o! deficiency produced by free living, refidence in warns Climates, or too much indulgence of feduetive pillions, and in aH recent venereal complaints, early application infarct' an immediate cure. But in the moil com plicated cafes of debility, accompanied by fever, or diforders of the fyftein arifing from negletfted :Medium (.me perievmnee is indifpenfably requilite for rise reactmatiol of the cot-Likud" and reftorarlon to health and vigour. In all cafes, in either fee, the molt nvinlable fecrecy is obfav • ed and the terms of remuneration are plainly Rated on the firft inte•-view. TO MY CORRESPONDENTS. The extended reputation, which wad the brit objedi of my am bition, in the TREATMENT of V :;.ti FREAL CO MPL A IN PS and DEBILITY, having *waded to me various Correfpondento in the United Kingdoms of Great Britain, and ft om different parrs of Europe and America, I beg to oar& this Public Notice to fueh Correfpondents. The 0,-cupatiou of my time in anfwrring letters from thofe who grudge not remuneration, made it neceffary for me come yang* to aferve. that no letters could be noticed unlefs a bank Note was inclofed. I again repeat the information, that no letters. %With out inclofures, can be an'wcred, unlcfr from Patient. Arcady tin der my care. And I beg to Black that letters from the Weft li.dies, or from any, Foreign Country. melt contain not only a complete ftacement of the Cafe, but a very liberal film, fufa-icnt to compenfate for (bodying and writing fully on the Complaint, and for the Preparation LE a confide:able Caulk of Medicine t•y a London Chemiti, if loch Mould be requiSte. Where the difLince does not admit frequency of correfpondenee,it is ago derived, that the age, the manner of living and general fsennp. as well as ewers fympten that can poffibly be defcribed, be mall particularly fpe cified. Letters require no other direr/lon than the Chriftian and Sur- name," Martin Bree, F.fq. London and that the minds of either pent m ty have the fuikft affurance of feemey, the pelisse of letters, accompanied by Fees. nerd not be paid at the time. but will after wards be charged to the Fatty. MARTIN ERSE, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons in Londe,. No. 29, Arundel-Brett, Strand, near Temple-bar. There is an• additional entrance in Water Brest adjoining. LONDIZTN: PriatirenTpublifbei by LEPEL ABM: (ot Cm • terbury- Place, Lambeth) at the STaa-Orriea, N.. a. Carer- Rivet Pubiilad affo x the STA2•Of 1 ICS, Temple-Bar 11.. 4i .4` wome r .. 1•••••