Star. — London, England, 1816-11-21 00:00:00

Bogged. ` - Some time ago witness was about to bring • sic anion against the Captain, but denied that he gave it up that it might not be said he had any spite against, the defendant. Never gave his evidence at Shedasell Office when Mr. Stayers was examined. Robett Combe, also a seaman on board the qrh3tnee, confirmed the statement of the last witness.. .Creiss exanrined--Now held a situation in the VV'est-lndia Docks, where the deceased's father was head con stable. • Several others of the drew spoke to the different punishments the boy had received, as detailed by the first witness. The morning before the boy died, he told one of the witnesses tnat he was dying, and de sired the witness to tell his father how the Captain had used him. Mr. Robert Gibson, father of deceased, declared, that. Captain Stayers never mentioned the death of his son to him Cross-examine)—Two letters werb Leaded to witness, which he believed to be the bud ' writing of his son. Mr. ANDRIW3, on the part of the defendant, endea voured so 'hew, by his comments on the evidence, that although the story of the different witnesses was in some respects consistent, yea that when the motives were considered why they gave this testi mony, imputing to a most respectable gentleman the most horrid deeds, against the very repetition of which human nature revolted, no credit could be given to them. There Could be no doubt that they came into Court under a malicious combination, to take away the character of a gentleman who had so honourably conducted himself, at least before this charge was made against him. • Mr. Andrews then proceeded to call witnesses on behalf of the defendant. John Younger, in the voyage in question, was sur . geon on board Captain Stavers's ship. He had not been always on good terms with the Captain, and bad contracted no intimacy since that time. The boy Gibs el, during his illness, was taken the greatest care of, and had even wine given to him. The pu nishment Liven to the lad was not. so severe as would endanger either his life or his health, and Gibson never complained of cruel c hastisement to him. Two days before the death of dirlad, witness knew he was in a dying state. On the day previous to his death wit %mess brought him some soup made on purpose fine him. He took a little, and then in a faint voice said " no," and mode a motion with his head and band, intimating that lie could not eat any more. Crussamatnined—Had heard, but had never seen, that Gibson was brought on deck, scrubbed, and pails of water thrown over him. When the dinner was brought to the boy the day before he died, the Captain was present, with a rope in his hand. He shock the rope over the boy's head, and witness could not swear that he did not strike him : could Got recollect if tine Captain said any thing at the time. lie admitted that there were several marks on the body of the boy when he vies dead. When asked if four dozen lashes was a proper punishment to a 14 years old, the witness answered, 46 I illOnid not like it myself," and would make no other reply—it was usual in his Majesty's vessels for the Surgeon to be present at the punishment of any of the crew ;it was not so in South-sea traders, but witnesr 9 uld not see why it should not be; the boy was very stout when the ship left England. Henry Grant, cooper on board the Thames, knew the boy Gibson. He was in his opinion a sad who wanted correction. Never saw any correction given to Gibson, because he always went away when he saw any prepai ations for it. William Templeton was carpenter in the ship Gibson was a very dirty and negligent boy, and de served punishment; received two letters from the deceased to be sent to England, and after the death of tha boy witness gave one o f them to the Captain. Cross-ekamined-a.Told Gibson's father that the Captain had destroyed his son's letter; never had told Mr. Gibson that his son had been used cruelly. Witneis advised Mr. Gibson to let the cause drop.— The boy never crwsiplained to hits of ill treatment. Captain Day, Mr. J. Stone, and several others, gave the defendant an excellent character for humanity. The case for tJ)e defendant being concluded, Mr. Gibson wati recallednri the part of the prosecution, and be proved that Templeton was the first person t.ho Mated to him the its treatment of his son. Mr. Justice HOLROYD having at considerable length summed up the evidence, the Jury without hesitatioa found a verdict—Guilty. A similar indictment had been framed against James Baxter, the mate of the Thames, for the same offence; and Mr. Waturonn for the prosecution now stated, that he was authorised to inform the Court that the prosecutor would not detain their Lordships by going through the whole of the evidence against Mr. Baxter, provided that gentleman would withdraw Bis plea of not guilty, and declare himself guilty of the offence. Mr. Baxter then, by the advice of his Counsel, pleaded Guilty. Sir WILLIAM Score then addressed Stayers, ob. serving, that he had been convicted by an attentive jury, after a loot/ investigation, of having extremely ill treated an apprentice committed to his charge.— The law bad, no doubt, authorized persons in his situation to exercise a certain degree of consroul and discipline over those under his command, and this authority was necessary to the security of the lives and property of others.—But the law could never to lerate the mdidgence of capricious passion, orof any savage disposition. The prisoner had obviously es. ceeded 'the limits of that discretionary power with' which he Was invested, by so harshly treating a boy whose tender years and growing infirmities were pe culiarly entitled to the. consideration of humanity. But the prisoner had, unfortunately for himself, dia. regarded that consideration, and violated the duty , wbichhe owed to a boy committed to his special pro-. %Niko. 'lt was to be hoped, however, that the pal Goner would profit by the lesson wkiclayouldnow be taught him, and that. be would hereafter learn to discipline those gpssions wilt* bad in. this in s tance led him into such culpable meas. The loatuedi Judge concluded with pronouncing the sentence of, enet, that the prisoner should pay a fine of 4150,1 b e ; t ip' r iserbcd for melee apatite in Nana% the imprisonment tele condeoed Wit the 6ne be p a id. Wsr. Buter, the Mate, was sentenced , to , pay a Cunt. Me tad, to czar itSO recavaisallu ;(b keep • I 1 • the peace towards all his M.ijesty's stiliects for twelve months The Court thettadjourned to the 9th of February.' Coy T OF KING 'rt BENCH. it • 1 REX C. t INIIJAISITANTs or Petignl. TawJust:ce by am order, removed Robert Morris, his wile. and four childrea, from the parish of —, in Pearyn, to the parish of Calttiorp, both in the county sit Cornwall. Ttre Sessions on appeal, confirmed the order, subject to the opinion of this CGurt on a case, stating that the pauper occupiedleur rooms in a house' in the borough of Penryn, for which he paid in per annuni, the whole rent of the house being sCIS ; in respect of which last mentioned suet he was assessied, and duly paid the said assessment, his landlord de ducting the amount from the rent payable for the four rooms. The question for the opinion of the Court was, whether the pauper gained the settlement in the borough of Penryn under these circumstances, by virtue of the statute S Will. S. c. 11. which declares that "If any Perlon, who shall come to inhabit in any town or parish, shall be charged with 'and pay his share towards the public taxes or levies of the said lowa or parish, he shall be adjudged to have a legal settkeitnt in the same," &c. Mr. Gemara and ;4r. W. P. Tatoterow contended that the pulpit gained a settlement in the borough of Penryo, relying upon the authority of the above statute and several analogous cases. Mr. GUMMY (contra) contended, that this head'of settlement law had been put an end to by the nat. 35 Geo. S. c. 101. 3. 4. which enacted, d•that' front and alter the passing of this Act, no person or persons what soever, who,ahail come into any parish, township, or place. shall gain a settlement in such parish, &c. by being charged with and paying his or their share to wards. the public taxes or levies of. the said parish, /cc. for and on account or in respect of any tenement, not being of the yearly value of £10." He relied upon Rex v. the Inhabitants of Islington, 1 EastJ StlIS. as a decisive authority. The Court thought the words of the Statute 95 Geo. 111. c. 101. as conclusive, and therefore affirm ed the older of Sessions. PREROGATIVE COURT, DOCTORS' COMMONS. WEDNESDAY, NOV. 20. DOFFELL AGAINST JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, BY HIS GUARDIAN. This came before the C•;urt on the admission of the alkgation. It arose respecting the Last Will and Testament of James Johnson, tormerly of the Island of Jamaica, and late of Wimpole.street, in the parish of Mary-la-bonne, in the county of Mid dlesex, Esq. deceased. It appeared that the deceased executed a Will on the 21st of. June, 1793, by.which he provided for his wile and his two children, and also for the child or children of which she was then pregnant. That afterwards he came to Englaad to reside, leaving his original Will in the Island of 'Ja maica. It further appeared, that after the deceased came to this country, he had issue three more chil dren, and he intended to provide for them by a sub sequent paper, which was an unfinished paper. It also appeared that the deceased died suddenly on the 3J July, 1815, leaving personal property to the amount of 4200,0(X). The Learned Judge (Sir JOHN Miami) observed, that as the property in question was of great magni tude, and a proceeding was now pending respecting the same, he was unwilling to come to any decision on the admission of an allegation, and accordingly rejasted it. • HILLMAN AGAINST DICIONSOS/ AND °TIMMS. This was 4 cause respecting the lest will and codi cil of John Hillman, late of Hampton. in the county of Middlesex, Esq. deceased. It appeared that the will of the deceased bore date th: 13th December. 1806, and the codicil, which was written at the bot tom of the will, was without a date. The evidence in this case, in support of the instru ments in question, being so full and satisfactory, the Learned Judge pronounced for the validity of the same. COURT OF CHANCERY, NOVEMBER IC CHAMBERS V. BRAILSFOIM. This case was heard on an appeal . from the judg ment of the Master of the Rolls.• The question it involved arose on the construction of the will of Sa muel Branslord, made in 1'7951. • The testator, at the time ne dr w up his will, had a brother named John, and two nephews called Thomas and Samuel, sons of an elder brother, called Thomas. • Thomas was the elder, and Samuel the younger cf these nephews. The latter had a son called Thomas, who was of course the grand-nephew of the testator. The testa tor, after various legacies and devises to his wife, his relatives, and friends, devised his real property, con sisting of some lands in Derbyshire and Notting hamshire, to the trustees, his brother John being one. They were to hold the said lands to the use of Tho mas Brailsford, son of the testator's nephew, Samuel Brailsford, or his assigns, during the term of his natural kite, and afterwards they were to stand seized to the use of the firsthorn son of Thomas Brailsford. After devising the said lands to John, his brother, during his life, en the death of the said Thomas' Brailsford, or in failure of issue, he disposed of the residue of his real property to is the said Thomas Brailsford, son of his nephew Samuel Brailsford, in fee." The question was, whether the worde,.." the said Thomas Braitsford." referred to the nephew or the grand nephew of the testator. The Master of the Rolls decided in favour of the latter, and from his decision the former now appealed. • Mr. HAUT and Mr. LEAL% were hoard for the ap- The former contended, that though the legal and grammatical construction of the words " the said 'nom*: Brailsford," if there had been no I opposite evidence in the deed itself, would bare re ferred to the grand nephew of the devisee, and not the heir at law, yet that there was such improbability in this interpretation, that it could not be sustained. Thomas Brailsfoid was, in one part of the will, to enjoy the use of the lands in question for the term of his natural life, and afterwards (that is, after his death) he was to . 7 .njoy theirs in fee. As this was.ob •served the samtperson could not be meant in both passages whett such devises were made. Therefore the testator in one of them must have meant his ne phew, who would, if this interpretation were re. jetted, be the Only one of his rehitiOns foistitten fey him. Mr, LRAM contended, that es the words in both .plosts mould not a yto the seer individual, there was a la trot Ipteittapp.of ths tiptor . rt ; ;A' 'lr. • t • . 9 .. that the devisee could not be meant in both ; and That therefore Thomas Brailsford the elder, though he could not claim as • a devisee, should not be cut off from his rights us heir at law., •' ' - Sir S. !Instil-Ll', for the devisee; Thomas Brails (mil, son of Samuel Brailslord, the nephew of the testator, contended that as no oitt.r — Phonias Brails ford was mentioned: before the clause on whiek the 1 , question arose, but his cl:ent, the. words 44 the said" did not slink of the least ambiguity. It was no pre sumption against his being the Fetsun meant to enjoy the testator's estates in fee, that they had formerly been devised to him fur a life interest. It was plain the will was not drawn up with much knowledge of 14w or much technical precision. It was not allow. able to raise a latent ambiguity by striking out words out of a legal Instrument, and then to allay that am biguity either by a conjectural construction cf the other parts of the deed, or by the admission of parole evidence. Mr. I.leu. followed on the same side. _ _ _ The Luan CHANCELLOR said, whatever might be his' wishes ur his opinions as Sus individual, he was obliged to adhere to the natural and legal construe. non of the instrument before him, if it involved no impoWbility or absurdity. His Lordship went over the will, commented on the different parts of it con nected with the present suit, and concluded by affirm ing the judgment of the Master of the Rolls. IiETMOUR SI. EUSTON. • This was like Wise an appeal Case from the Rolls. Sir A. PIGOT stated, that the appellant was George Fradeis Seymour, the eldest son of the late Lord', Hugh Seymour, who claimed a right by a codicil to his lather's will to 2-7thri•of the property disposed of by that instrument. Lord Hugh Seymour left six children. The whole of his property was converted into personal estate, or left to trustees to be so con verted. One of these trustees was Lord Euston.— The Master of the Roils was of opinion that the plaintiff was entitled to Whits of some of his father's personal property, but only to I.6th of the rest ; and Born this judgment the appeal was made. The will of Lord Hugh Seymour was drawn up in 1793. By it he directs, that his real property, consisting of an estate in Hampshire, dec. should be sold by his trus tees, and the proceeds vested in the funds or oilier ,securities, for the benefit of his family. The divi dends and interests of these funds were to be applied for paying 41,200 a-year to Lady Horatio Seymour Conway, his widow, for the maintenance and educe tion of his children. The principal was directed to be equally divided among the children, the sons re ceiving their shares when they obtained the years of majority, and the daughters, either at that period, or upon their marriage, if their marriage should be approved of by the trustees. It was allowed that this will made an equal distribution of the testator's property among all his children ; and the claim of the present plaintiff was founded only on a codicil, *at lie contended had the effect of altering the pre. vious disposal of it. This codicil was dated April, 1797, and recited, that the te'tatnr being, at the time he wrote it, ignorant of - the extent of provis;on made for Lady Horatio in her marriage -settlement, and not recellecting the provisions of the will of 1793, had ocly to state his present wishes, which he be lieved ccnsonant with his former will, that Lady Hosatio should enjoy, .after his decease, 41,200 a- _ year, that she should use at much as she might re quire of his furniture, plate, linen, and wine (ot I which there was a great quantity), and that th e re . mainder should b e sold for the benefit of his children; which, together With the prize-money that fortune might entitle him to, should be divided into seven shares; two of which should be given to his eldest -son George, end his other children their proper shares of his small property when they came of age. The question was here, did the cOdicil‘dfvise to the eldest I son only 2-7tlis of the money accruing from the sale of the wine, linen, and plate, with the contingent prize-money, or 2-7ths of all the testator's property? Did the word •• which" refer merely to •the residue of the purchase-money, plate, &c. or to the whole what the testator afterwards calls his 41 small pro perty ;" Would the testator. in wishing tn disrin gnish his eldest son, as he evidently did. from the rest of his family, have left him so small an addi tional testimony of his favour ? . The sale of pro peity, which might be exhausted by his widow, and the proceeds of contingent prises, which might never be realized, was not likely to be the only fund out of which the eldest sou was to have his augmented share. The testator afterwards, in 1798, made another co dicil to his will, which added sB2OO to his widow'S jointure ; but 'did not alter the provisions in his for mer deeds. It was contended, on the minx side, that this codicil referred to the will, and took no notice of the codicil of 1797 ; but was not a matter of any consequence. as it left matters as they previously I stood. Mr. Liam followed on the same side, and ad vanced some very ingenious arguments for the appel lant ; but as the Court rose earlier than usual, the pleadings on the otlutr side were postponed. IRELAND—In consequence of the murder of Lynrh and his family, a Meeting was lately held at Castle. bellinghana, at which 21 Magistrates were present, when it was unanimously resolved to memorial the Loan LISIITZNANT of IRO AND to proclaim the Ba. ronies et Ardee, Loath, and Upper and Lower Dun dalk. A reward of 4400 is to be paid to the par son who shall give the fi rst information that s h a ll I lead to detection and conviction of the persons con. cerned in the above atrocious murder. To each of the next four persons who shall give information, a reward of 0200. To every other. person who shall next give information 450 ; and 025 to each person who shall give private information. resides the above, the Police Magistrates of Dublin have of. fered a reward of 450 for a similar purpose. PROMENTIAL &SAM —On Wednesday, the 6th iastant, the Post Boy, bye packet, Captain MAGEE, ' on her voyage to Carnarvon, with passengers, was lost on the bar of Carnarvon. She had sailed from Dublin on Tuesday morning, having on board the family of the Rev. C. Balmoroan, &c. On the night of Wednesday, through the ignorance or obstinacy of the pilot, attempting to pass the bar at an im. roper time , of tide, she unfortunately:truck, and instantly wentedowns The passengers had fortunately quitted'hur id the boat abut a quarter . of an hour befouls-au! faiglapatiodirsereedlp thou to save the istimaretr. •-a _0 . r.°. •V` • •. . .4.- •'" ••. • • DRURY-LANE MUM. MISS MERRY, whose first appearanc: A t t h e p . Opera, las: silo:met, promi.eJ so any! Hhase ir u subsequent indisrsitiondampt of those sangitilie Iticntis wh o d the many casualties to v exposed, made her debsie at th s Them e the eh ;ratter of 11fandata4 The nervo us under which site lab-used, wit!: lust public andii:nce,:siiii - niif ( ill,' 7 1 present occasion t her fears operat e d, s ga i teci t fectness'of intonatio n ....Inch i s t h e hteltest-Ae' essential quality of a singer ; but in her styl e , ‘ received no impression from her feelings a:4 l meat, she exi:ibited a correctness of tast e ., with time and exprrienee, will render t.e ? 0 ‘ performer of no mean di,unctum , Tit Air, " The Soldier•tit'd," she. eseeuttd. s o k brilliancy, and in lulled lane; she tuns et o ': every voice in the house ; and we mill; b e h t , et t. , u p on a repet i t i on of t hi s o,:era, witch out for to-mrrrow, Miss Many wi:l Cis powers, though at first obscured by exce„ . „ ! , desty and tear, arc mat sills: led, b at will .ipp 4 , every advantage that natur a l ta l ents and 41,ta3 educatit— can afford. Mr HORN, jq 41.* delightfully ; it is true that he ; ostewes Qa t Italian; denominate a TeL'erft:l4e; it is net o, tedi .bat his knowledge of the art is undnuhted,.%4 is pure, his acting is judicirw, and he is ytt hands of an excellent master. p.lr. litusatp,, respectability to the part of Adobes,: wlud i seldom possessed ; 114 rertvrtnAtt,e, both.: in ac and singer, is deserving of the highest pt i a,. ; Mr. Pvsiz, in Adaxerxei, received the wea k , most richly deserved applause; his self. The Opera was bre:ll3la out with g nu , dour of decoration, the. scenery being ill am fi;••••" -- 74, BUW4TREET: ltio Ith.-- Yesterday ,Id i s & It% young man who w.is detected in breaking lows of Mr. Morrison, the bake[, the c,r 4 , Green•strert and Castle -street, Leictstaluatt, Friday evening, alter the Meeting in Spa F it ik, brought to this Office, and underwent a 5e 01 4, 1 mination before Mr, MAI k LL B , r lodges at Mr. Shepherd's, 143, St. Niar,ir.'sk e , l baker, attended, and stated th.,t on Friday e' er last he was at Mr. Morrison's shop, alma; 7 A , 6, when a very numerous mob presented L 61104.14 the front of Mr. Morrison's house. kir.v with a view to prevent misclbet, give A nem * loaves away to the m were waren,' this, however, did not have the desired Orm e proceeded to break the strap windows, a„d Ilse the street proceeded to take the haves throt broken squares of glass. He received a blot, something which broke the window, ar,d cortk the shop. but coold not tell whit it was, 04.4, 4 was 01 a hard sattance.—Jo ties 13arciay, to Mr. Morrison, was in the shop at the taw tie attacked it, and picked n large piece of in.h tar, about the size of a small fist, winch led oa, counter--Robert I-rerrnan, another smelt t(6! Morrison, cortobortted this testimony.-jami s one of th:• vr;;ce constables belaagnigith Office, stated, that obsei red the prisoner,JiSiii vern, among the mob, :.lIJ brandrling a stick , which he had in his hand, and saw I:411(1660 break a square of glass in Mr. Morrison'seapi , dow, and afterwards put his hapds Through a istsl square of glass, and take not a loot ; 1441 sure whether it was a quaitern or hilt ' he seized the prisoner ; he was assisted by 11119. patrols in securing him, which being obtcrtd others of the mob, there was a gen:rate:, U.-. &c. and which was attempted to be coal. `Lt called out give us bread or blood, hut he d.a the prisoner say so. The prisoner was' fur trial on a cha'e of burglary. MA Itt11,101:GII-SYllEEL--YesterJay and J. Adams mere committed I.r compoundc penal statute, in obtaining Ll. 3s. of 6. K. , ' 'against whom an information had been laid, thereby, defrauding the Croon. Ibe tolloisingi the particulars :—Adams laid an hoot rnation Rodman for out having the number painted al cart, the penalty of which is 4h. half of 140.! to the informer. On the 'slay the Inforinatioa be heard, Harwood, who acted as witness to Ai • told Rodman he would pat him in a i‘ay to things easy, and Adams was soon fortbcc was then proposed that R. - adman pay share of the fine, and fls. costs, by which save halt the rule, which went to the Cows. Wood agreed, for Rudman's security, to go aitto other room' and tear the warrant, and Roots+ to deposit stil. S. tnidis the candlestick, ..'!in 'done accordingly. The s:ittence on convict:: impiimment and the pillory. After the must minute enquiry int') as CI stances connected with the late fire at D.lcuire' there does nor appear the slightest ground to that the fire ori , ,inated horn design. It began , ' s' me dry billets and (hers left at the foot of the staircase, for lighting the fires neat more;ng. MARkIED. Nov. 5, at Padstow, Mr. Slauson. to Miss Beam— , may be ju-tly said to tact expt.4.;:t. d thetr busbies.; as 5t. 4 9! no rigid on Cuesday, grew sullen ou Wechte.day, rot 4 each other on Tburt.day ; on Frit!uy words cause forth, t,cfl product: 4o open breach; so that on the Saturday • separated by 1111n1131 consent. Nov. s 4, the Key. Wm. Knight, Revor of St. Michat. , tol, to bli,s Hay thorne,er DIED. -Monday le'unight, in his 75: b year, the Rev. Morgan Rector of Llasaint fread, Brecknockshire, who has left s ten children to lament their loss. On the 20th ult. Mr. John Imlay, Master of the free mar School, at Sutton Valence, in Kent. He presided( Institution 26 years, and was hi t ;lily respected in this head, and by the Trustees or the Selool. PlekitlF. OF S*l OCNS YEtri ER DAY. Bank Stock --- I India Stock S per Ct. Lied 62 4 f Judi:L.l3°los 1617 pre Ditto Cons. 624 633 Imp. Ann. 62 4 per Cents. 7711 Extheyer Billet! I 4 pr. 5 per Cent. Navy 9' #3 Cons. for acc. G 3 Cj A Long Aim: 141.10 i Lottery Tickets Xis if& COAL Ships at Market. 28 Newcastl: it Suadetiand ti(El, NO :4ER ;.14 Ship. sold. • Pritt. 1$ ssi. ed. to • 4ta fti. to et. 01. td. to 001 O Scotcb Coal 0 HIGH WAT N 4 ER TO MORROW AT LO PO", ottling . - SI min.efor Afternoon • . 14., - CONDON- Prin:eil by Lavas. P*l4loll tliete a and a; the Ohr•OLUCt. TOO Pr° !* - • • .% • A t' 'r I 100 Assess in intonarion winch is the hreliese- 44 SIII she. executici. e h .• ' ll :dyed no impression ential quahty of a singer ; but in her ni t a time ier of nu d o o ez . t e ri .i e n n i: e r. d :,: t a i I . l l i c i e l t r i o r t il a: e . n d li t : 7 : l l 4s t . a s ti -i-.0 0 ; 0. . 1 ~. tat, she ezi:ibited a correctness or feelings of 4 's: The Soldier • tit'd," r t r f h , o r , , . p r Iliancy, and in "scaled rant tt „ lt , c \'''../. ry voice in the howse ; aud a- ii ---414 "I'B e rea r (A t , c• • .. on a repetition cat this 0 •era e• I - '' ' •11 3' —0 ...Art.' 11.• t for to-merrow, Miss Manny *4l 4 4 5 ' I veers, though at first obs l u rtel by "I' ' exce,. sty aod fear, arc flit rsuileitted, bnt watt Iv, .1 • 1 app 4 try advantage that natural talents and 41 ucatio . can afford. Mr Hoax, ill Alip t, n' . 4 1 lighttally ; it is true that he ; °kisses 146, tlian; denominate a TeLi•ef vl;ce ;it is not • e j, t his knowlldge of the art is ondoubted,.%, pure, his acting is jodicicti!, r anfrd he se „;.:- •. " ids of an excellent master ii ' ' 'el' • •,. 04 40 . 1 pectability to the part of ildaknui iq m ua l l . . e fi dom possessed ; his rertermaroe, both 41 a „ ' a ,„ ' 1 d singer, is deserving of th e highest pei„ ; • " . .,i r. PYNE, in Aria:ante:, received t h e wee , E,4 I .. „di est richly deserved applause ; hi s voice ie t ,., - 1 If. The Opera was brcuilit out with . • 1 great , lur of decoration, the. scenery being all new, "1 BtrII.BTREET. -- li.lOrth.•—• Yesterday Jaf i ss e*, 1 rung man who was detected in breaking e x if ,ws of Mr. Morrison. the baker, the c.„1,4, reen-strert and Castle -street, Leicester le e , iday evening, atter the Meeting in Spa Field ' e ought to this Office, and underwent a *owl ' ination before Mr, tlAnas.—Matk L ni • n. ir MO dges at Mr. Shepherd's, 143, St. Maar:sl ate , iker, attended, and stated that on Friday ai m: , st he was at Mr. Morrison's shop, about 7 Sy, 4 , hen a very numerous mob presented themseats • e front of Mr. Morrison's house. 1.1e9e, ~ ith a view to prevent mischiet, gave a num* 1 ayes away to the trels, wh. i were waren the - '''i iis, however, did not have the desired elects.!,. 4;.0 roceeded to break the slinp windows, A A* ore le street proceeded to take the leaves throat , za7 roken squares of glass. He received a blov., imething which broke the window, and on, ..ii le shnp, but conic: not tell what it was, osh e 4 so as ee a hard suhttance.--Jo aes Barclay, .iele .psras • Mr. Morrison, was in the stop it the time ere . 114 t 4 ttacked k, and picked 132 e large piece of hails. 7 4 ; tr, about the size of a small fist, which Leda:. .0— ittnter--Robert I-rerrian, anotherservoirol! 1 lorrken, corroborated this testimony.—Jobs!- r . I!by, one of th e . F.r;;ce constables beloaginesel 1 lake, stated, that fie ohses ved the prisoner,Rei iii ern, among the mob, :aid brandellog a stick ate; sea rhich he had in his hand, and saw him dirriact lip reak a square of glass id Mr. Morrison'riblivi d ow, and afterwards put his hapds through eke . luare of glass, and take oat a loaf ; .s. %.10 r ""1 are whether it was a quartern or hilt quai.eis: 1 , boa e seized the prisoner ;he was misted by the:lL cr aw atrole in securing him, which being obtrlrd tl , them of the mob, there was a gen:Luc: 2 e.-'.'e, tin :c. arid which was attempted to be teem ei. !ii alled out give us bread or blood, but he dst vie. It; he prisoner say so. The prisoner was coreCt .7, Jr trial on a chafe of burglary. Ca MA ItLB,Itrit:GII-SyttEet.--Yesterlay I. Elm: . nd J. Adams mere committed I.r compound „,.; enal statute, in obtaining WI. 3s. of 6. tOosat gainst whom an information had been latd,O q hereby, defrauding the Crown. .1 he rolliesinge A he particulars :—Adams laid an inicarnation l a ter,_ todman for hot having the number p.anted ieu art, the penalty of which is CA. half of whic4 A o the informer. On the day the Infos-m.4km *I ase le heard, Har wood, who acted as witness to AM .... Did Rodman he would pat him in a tray to la hings easy, and Adams was soon forthcorningli. vas then proposed that R--;lima" should NO. hare of the fine, and !Is. costs, by which xO , 0 ave halt the fine, which went to the Crown. *lli M rood agreed, for kodman'e security, to g' mud 14 ther room' and tear the warraiit, and Roam4o gh o deposit Li. S. lender d.e candlestick, .'::i=n' lb lone accordingly. The sentence or, convict:A w minims/tent and the pillory. After the must minute enquiry into a'.l:l:e c;ro wires connected with the late fire at D.lvoirC 4l here does not appear the slightest ground to c: hat the fire oriliotted Isom design. It begat) , a me dry billets :old (hers left at the foot of tile ti s • tairease, for Wining the fifes nest morn;ng. 1 MARkIED. ....-----..s 3 Nov. 3, at Padstow, Mr. Slausots to Miss Bosses.-11i4 es nay be ju-tly said to have expc,.;:tt ti then - business; as tit l f. S one rigid on ' Cuesday, grew sullen on Wednesday, di) vat'; /11 tacit other on Thursday; on Iritiay words came forth, t . ,, aa. • m.o.:net:4n open breach; so that on the Saturday sve go l `I oarattd by mutual consent. ' Z Nov. 14, the Rev. Wnt. Knight, Rector of St. Mich.% t.l 01, to epic Hay thorne, of Br's. td. ". .. DILD. Monday iteunight, in his 75:h year, the Rev. Morgan 1 10 . Rector of Llasaintiread, Brecknockshire, who has le ft s w MI children to lament their loss. .4 On the 20th ult. Mr. John Imlay, Waiter of the Free ( mar School, at Sutton Valence, in Kent. He presided 0 Institution 26 years, and was highly respected in the on h hood, and by the Trustees or the SeatioL 4 • PfklUf. OF S'l OCES YEtrl ERDAY. 11 Bank Stock .-- I lodia Stock S per Ct. lied 624 i Indiallonds 1617 pr" 4 Ditto Cons. 643 risi Imp. Ann.6l 4 4 per Cents. 7711 Exciarver AN I t 14 P L . 5 per Cent. Navy 93-lif Cons. for ace. G 3 SCI .'i Lone Asti. 16 1-161 Lottery Tickets ‘ls It'!' • I COAL MAKET, NO VEMbER ;. ,, J. i Ships at Market. Ship. sold. • Price. 28 Malawi is n 555. a m ass' , 8 Cs. 6d. to et• " 1 t Stuadetiand 0 Scar* Coal 0 as. Od• t° 64)1 " 111414 WATER TO MORROW AT LONDON SR I 1 si Mosease . - e ~..4 1 Aft ............ ern . : ___ .... _ ..... : . .....L," - ",..----orin ; • Teekertrege ' LONDON- Printed by Leval. KNNT, • im I' there, and a; the 140.01fiet, TOO" taglokolll r ~. .:~- . C~ ~l: