Star. — London, England, 1809-12-27 00:00:00

• .. •' - . it • Lillie INTELLIGENCE. th to ; COURT OF EXCHEQUER, DUBLIN, DEC. t. . tin ELIZALETH MADDEN V. D. M g EUAN. . Pi i This was an action brought, by the plaintiff for da- t/ Ottlages against the defeudant, for a breach of promise 1 ) 4 irk marriage. at ! Mr. Jens stated the case. He said..it was an tc- it tiou brought by the plaintiff t 9 be reprised in damages a !for a bmtch of promise of marriage. She was a fe- . 11 ' pale of tender years, tiot being at present more than jvi (between 15 and 16 years of age ; a matter of fact jai !which he called upon the Jury to carry in theirmind 1 Y' !dining the present investigation, in case the base and I h iiiinmiliabk defence, which he was instructed the de- n tendant intended to make, should be resorted to. The ! si defendant had been ori g inally intended for the pro- `a Session of an attorney, and had been, for some time, in the office of one of the moot respectable practi- n . tioaeis in• Dublin; he afterwards changed his inten- tion as to his professiona.l pursuits, and obtained a ° commission in the army. The acquaintance between n the plaintiff and defendant commenced about four or fire years ago ; when even at that early age there I was an attraction of personal charms in the plaintiff, , P which made a serious and an honourable impression In *a the heart of the defendant. The parties were in jti ; the habit of meeting at the houses of their common l el fritnds ; and the impression which the lady's charms a I made upon the defendant, at a time when her youth 0 rendered her not a fit object for matrimonial connec- d ; tion, induced him to press her to become his wife, j I 1 when years shottld have rendered her age proper, and P accordingly, from that period to the month of June d last, he continued his attention ; and in that month, I h.: made a formal proposal to her father, having first r o ,rained the lady's consent. The match was an eli- d gible one—the defendant had a sufficient fortune to d s ipport her; and her father consented to the mar- r stage, provided his daughter's consent could be 01.- 'd t tined—that had already _been procured ; and so" P soixious was the defendant to prevent delay, that he s proposed to have it celebrated on the 7th of that T month, this however, the plaintiff as well as her parents t objected to, in consequence of which,the nuptials were d , postponed until the 11th. The ring was purchased; t the wedding clothes were bespoken ; the relations F were informed of the intention ; every necessary pre- t paration was made to carry the wishes of the parties 3 into effect. The defendant's mother conceived an anti- pathy towards the intended wife of her son. She was F unwilling he should engage in any matrimonial con- t nexion ; it was not her wish that such a connexion C should be formed as might eventually deprive her s daughter of that property which the defendant pos- r sessed. . In order to explain the case, which would' r be proved, it would be necessary for him to read two_ r letters, one of them dated on the 3d of June, and the t other on the sth. These letters would fully explain / the reason why the defendant had broken the engage- ment he had made, and satisfy the Jury 9f the nature of I the engagement. The Learned Counsel then stated 1 the two letters to which he had alluded. The first 1 of those letter's was written to the plaintiff ; the second I to her father, and were to the following effect : i "My dear Bess -e-I canuot describe the situation I feel myself at this moment in, when I reflect on the deranged state my mo- ' ther left this, this teeming, going over to your father, knowing , tier to possess so unfortunate a temper, lest she might say any thing that would have hurt the feelings of you, your father, or mother. But be assured of this, that you shall never experience I the slightest cruse of your repenting your having fixed your cktsice 1 on the son of a woman that, I fear, must has's: conducted herself , so insane, as I fear the has done this day. Although it is a see 1 rity for me to retrain at home this evening to settle some busi- ness, but I will be with my angel early to-merrow. lqtercede with your mother and father fur my mother, who, notviithstan- , ding her viol= temper, is good natured ; andyou know, fless, she I is my parent. With the sincerest love believe me to be, dear Bess, B. hillEoaN." " Driest Salt—lt is with the utmost sorrow I feel myself bound i to communicate to you a circhmstance, although the recollection of it must can .e a pang to a parent. Nevertheless, from the situ*. I Coo in which I am placed, I feel it necessary to do,'and think it 1 3 iortunate circuinstanct: for both 'parties, that I was acquainted • with it so timely, us it must be evident to you and the world, bow I would have acted afterwards. " I think It sufficient to call your recollection to a love scene, acted in Hudson's Demesne, last summer twelve months. I shall i pot wound you further to say between whom; but of this be as. `fired, that although I would net ally myself to any woman on ' earth that the slightest gale of suspicion ever touched, you may ! depend of its being buried in the darkest ob li vion with me. Ido i I then decline the bchwer intended for me, and leave it to your good sense to satisfy your daughter, without letting her know the rea- son why I beg leave to decline the honour of her hand. I am, dear Sir, your 's sincerely, " B. MIGAN." June .5, lao9. The Learned Counsel then said, he was not certain whether the Defendant had instructed his Counsel to make that base and false defence, and whether they had been directed to blast the cleracter of a female scarcely fifteen years of age, or not: but, if they should i , ti resort to so shameful an alternative, it would be proved incontestibly to be as scandalous a calumnia- -1 tion as ever proceeded from the lips of falsehood. . John Salmon was then examined by Mr. GooLD ; slid he was a bookbinder, and lived in Cope -street, i in the neighbourhood of the Plaintiff, who lives in Anglesea-street, and follows the lace manufactory —the Plaintiff's father and mother are both alive, i i an,i hare no other child but the Plaintiff, who, he letlieved to be between fifteen and sixteen years of i all. 1-las known the family about five years ; 'i i when he first knew rte family she was a child; she appt.ued to h;.ve been brought up in the most vir- taus manner. Knew the defendant about five years; . 1 whoa he first knew him, heard he was a gentleman of fortune; he appe:lrs now to be about the age of 25 . or 25 , mec the defendant frequently at parties in the house of the plaintiff's father—he was very attentive to the plaintiff, and preferred dancing with her. Saw the defendant in or about the month of June last, and had a cenversatinn with him—on the 3d of June, be- t tv C;in :6 and 9 (Mock in the evening, witness called on the defetniant at his lodgings. There was no per- son in the room but the defendant and his mother, who was standing at the window, and seemed to he abusing him. After the witness was there about 15; or 20 minutes, the defendant desired his mother to tg ) up stairs ; in a little time after she went out of the li - roam. Witness then said, he was sorry to have been tit? innocent cause of producing a qtnirrel is the fa- mily, by telling them about the intended marriage, i ' which he had presumed the defenclint had already in- formed the family of. The witness had mentioned the matter to his cousin, the defendant's brother-in- law. Witness had heard that the defendant bad pro- paled for the plaintiff through her father. The de- endant desired the witness not to make anyapology, fog he did not want it to be kept a secret, and wished _ -1-•= - 4 - .ierkLz;A:....L....,__,—..... , , . . , ,• . - . to be made as public as possible ; that, in order to make it more public, he had Written to his friends at Boros-a-kane,"toinform them that the marriage was to take place in that week, and to he prepared to receive Bess. The defendant added, that he had asked his brother-in-law's brother to be present ; and that, if he turned against him, as the rest of his family had done - he did not care ; it was his with to have all the family happy on the occasion ; but if they would not be.so, he did rot care, for no power on earth should make him-de viate from what he proposed. The witness made answer, and said, that is the opinion I always had of you, for I always knew you would act as a man of honour ; to which the defendant replied, I never meant any thing else. The defendant's family con sists of his mother—a sister, married to his cousin, and some step-sisters. The two letters were then produced, which the wit ness identified as the hand-writing of the defendant. The Defendant said, it was not a hasty matter ; on the contrary, he said it. was not the suggestion of a moment—for that it had been a longtime in hisbreast. This witness was cross-examined by SerjeantMootte. He had frequently been with the plaintiff's family on parties of pleasure, when the defendant wasthere. Was not on a party when the younger part strayed from - the ancient head of the family. Never knew them to stray in the woods. It was not the custom to sit down and gormandize on the grass. Went for the pleasure of the day, and to view scenery. Was at Hudson's demesne about three years ago. Believes it was more. There was a large party that day—all convivial. The plaintiff did not dance with any particular person that day; the females danced occasionally with each other. Has heard rumours of different kinds of things, with respect to that day ; did not believe them:Jain consi dered what he rind heard as mere jest—could not, and did not believe.any such thing as what he heard ru moured had taken place. Didnot knoss that any pains were taken to clear it up. What he 'heard was I rom Mr. Nannery, to whom his son• went to school ; was shocked he could have entertained an idea of such a matter taking place between:such a pair as the plain tiff and his stun at that time were. They were well ac quainted as children ; considers persons to be children till they come to years of discretion. It was impossible, had they been older, for such a circumstance to have taktn place in the presence of their parents. Witness was told of the rumour by his daughter, Miss Salmon. What he heard he believed to be a falsehood. He heard that his son and Miss Madden, were conducting themselves in a manner to the injury of the character of the young lady. He had heard that a carman Magi . said, he had seen them in an improper situation. Wit ness never inquired after the ruffian that circulated the report ; for he was certain it. was false, and thei ef ore never took any trouble to clear it up. Witness did on that day chastise his son, who had broken down then branch of a tree, and leaped over a wall, having at that time a sore leg. Heard Miss Madden had received a blow from her father ; but never heard what was the cause. Mrs. Madden was thrown into a faint when the young lady was struck ; and believes the Plaintiff's father struck her, for keeping the cars waiting, and for ao other reason. Here the Plaintiff's case was closed for the present. Serjeant MOORE stated the defendant's case ; he 1 said he would address the Jury with that seriousness which the subject required, and which was due to the Court, to the public, and to himself. It was not a case for levity, but called for grave and solemn in quiry and investigation. The Lady who had brought this action for a supposed injury to her feelings, her interest, and her character, on a breach of contract of marriage, was described as beautiful and accom plished. Much had been said of the tender attentions paid to her education by her parents; but his instruc tions called upon him say, that her morals, how ever beautiful her face, or graceful her person might I be, whatever extrinsic accomplishments she might I have acquired—her morals had been neglected. In her own family she had neither precept or example to direct her an the paths of virtue nor decorum ; but, on the contrag, she lived in a constant habit of acquaintance nap profligacy. It would appear that she had, even "a considerable time ago, been unchaste. It would appear, he said, that she was permitted to associate with servants and other menial 1 parasites ; was brought out, on convivial parties, to the Dargle, to the Salmon-leap, and to Mr. Hud son's demesne ; where,' it would be shewn, a scene was performed, which he would leave to the wit nesses to describe ; for he would not injure his own feelings, nor insult the Court, by anticipating acts of indecency, which would appear in evidence. It was to this scene Mr. M'Egan's letter alluded. It came' to his knowledge by proof unequivocal, and he broke off from a contract that would have disgraced him for ever—if a contract could be presumed. Here the Learned Serjeant entered into a discussion of the legal operations of contracts. Mr. M'Egan, he said, ex pected a wife, not only chaste, but unsuspected. He was not bound to take a polluted bride to his arms. 1 He was imposed upon ; and, upon the discovery; he wrote the second letter, which shewed his delicacy and attention to the character of the Lady's family. But if the Jury were of opinion that-there was a con tract of marriage, and a breach of that contract, the circumstances of the case would not warrant them to , give more than nominal damages. • Mrs. Letitia Nannery was then called, and exa mined by Mr. Quasar. She said she was the wife of Mr. Nannery, the school-master, and was sister to , Mr. M'Egan, the defendant. She remembered hav ing been, about three years ago, at a party of plea sure at the demesne of Mr. Hudson. They dined and drank tea there. At the time of departure, she saw Mr. Salmon chastise his son for being ab sent ; and also saw Mr. Madden chastise his daugh ter. She shrieked ; and Mrs. Madden, when they Icame down to the road, cried out ---$ 4 You villain, will you murder my child ?" This, she understood, , was for being with young Mr. ,Salmon; and the ,', company understood some improper . conduct had taken place between them. Mr. bl‘NAttv cross-examined the witness. No would not ask her age, it was an unfair question eve* to a married lady, but he would ask her, did she ma , , member the innocent care of eleven years of age t—a" She said she did not. Then, madam, you have lup i recollection of any circumstance that, at so juvenile a time of life, could have agitated your mind, or have marked your conduct t Certainly not, ,Sir.*, Then, madam, I ask you, for the honour of, the fa male sex, add you tee there are many ladies present, • , - • .olon-nnt believe, that; at the age of eleven years, ;very girl, as well as yourself, possesses the same purity of mind and innocency of manners? I do sappoie so. Then why should you impute to this young lady an impurity of conduct that you never experienced? I heard it. You saw nothing to induce your opinion to so severe a censure ? I saw nothing. You SAW the young lady when her father brought her to the jaunting-car ? Yes—her hair was-dishevelled, and she was shrieking. rs it hot natural•to suppose her hair was dishevelled from the rough treatment of her father ?It might be so. Was she not dressed in a frock ? She was. Such as children wear ? Yes. —Yon were intimate, and kept company with the family ? Yes.---You knew young Salmon ? Yes.— I that the lad standing there behind the large era vat ? It is. —Now, on that day his neck was open ? It was.—His shirt collar over his coat? It was. He was a school ; boy, under the tutelage of your hus band ? Yes.—And'remained at your school after ? Yes.—Go off the table, madam ; though you came for the purpose, you have said nothing that can stain Miss Madden's character, or set up your brother's. John Young examined by Mr. Jorterros, Witness, said, he believed he was about 18 years of age:---1 knows the plaintiff, and has been acquainted with her two years and seven months : did not know Mr. M'Egan, the defendant, until tionday last : the plaintiff, when the witness first knew her, lived in, Hendrick-street,: witness was an apprentice in G.angegormandane : had seen the plaintiff at his master's house, but not insides she had come there: the acquaintance between them.commenced in conse quence of witness knowing an apprentice girl belong i ig to Mrs. Madden ; he, had been in the country, and had procured some fruit, and he saw the appre i tice, and gave her some of the fruit, and also gave the plaintiff some : was never introduced to the fa mily, but the plaintiff used to call to the house of witness's master, on purpose to take him away from his work ; this was about two years and a half ago;, he was acquainted with her some time before he came to the house ; when she came, the witness said he could not go with her till his work was finished recollects he did go, but she was ordered up to bed ; she was waiting for him at the window ; she saw him through the wincidw; .and raised it ; says she, ".my dear, what kept you so long ?" I told her I had "finished my work, and could not come down sooner : she then said, a My darling, will I take a lover's leap to you ?" Her attachment, however, was not SQ strong as to leap down : witness saw her different evenings after that, in presence of other persons— girls belonging to the house : the first evening he saw her, 'she asked him into the house to drink tea : about a year and five months ago, saw her one evening at, the rails of her father's house ; she got on them, and began to sing—a 011! take me to, your arms, my love ;" and, after she sang the verse, she threw her pelf into my erms—this was at the door : aftA - e family had rem )ved to Angles m-strett I w a a airs in her con:p my ; at the house of one Dunn, it. ar 'wen- Amer with some oth r females, one than 'Mar.. , ,aret Murray, and Murtagh Glum, where ey held some punch. Cross-examined by Mr. GREEN. Had n 3 acquaintance either with the father or the Adler of the plaintiff. Was not served with a sub pPna until Saturday last ; never spoke to the defen 'dant until last Monday. Margaret Murray examined by Mr. RIDGEWAY, said, that she had been apprentice to the plaintiffs mother ; she swore to having been at Dunn's house, drinking punch, with the last witness and the Plaintiff. On her cross-examination by Mr. Jsnn, she ac knowledged that the plaintiff's father had, through 'charity, taken her an apprentice, without fee, had fed her, and given her shoes ; had taken her sister as an apprentice, without .fee, and received her mother into the house as a servant, who had since left tha t ii:uation, and wras now in the employment of die de fendant's Mother ; she denied having ever told Mr. Wharton, the attorney, that she knew nothing dero gatory or disrespectful to the character or condtice of the plaintiff or her mother. On the part of the plaintiff, Mr. Wharton was ex amined by Mr. Goorn. He swore that he hid ap plied to the last witness, and had distinctly asked her what was her knowledge of the demeanour of Eliza Madden ? and that she informed him she did ' not know any thing disrespectful of her. Mr. Salmon, examined by Mr. MNALLT, said, he believed he was now about eighteen years of age, and is the son of the first witness. Knows Miss Madden, land was in her company on a particular occasion at Hudson's demesne about five years ago. No impro per familiarity took place either on that or any other occasion between him and the defendant.— Witness was on that day chastised by his father far leaping over a wall, then havinga sore leg. Wit ness, his sister, and plaintiff, were absent • from the' company for abort five minutes—the car was wait ing for them. He heard Mr. Maiden calling them; he leaped the wall asheing the shorter way to the cars—the plaintiff and:his .sieser went down the path., Nothing, at any time whatever, passed betweeh him and the plaintiff. This witness was cross-examined by Mr. Qurii. He said, he never heard, until about a fortnight ago,, that a carman had said he had seen him and Miss Madden in 'an improper situation. The case having here closed on both ' sides, Mr. Gootts,in an elegant and impressive appeal to the feelings of the, Jury, fathers, and brothers, observed on the defence set up by the defendant, and called' upon them to give exemplary damages. The LORD CHILE BA,RON, in his charge to the Jury observed, that they had three matters-for their consi deration. First they were to consider whether such a contract, as that set tip by the plaintiff, had been entered into by the defendant. Secondly—if they believed that, whether the defendant had broken through it. And lastly, under all the eirannsiances of the case, what damages the plaintiff was entitled ,to for studs conduct ? In considering thelatter point, the Jury should recollect, that they hadAo determine en the property of the defendant, and Mt site charac ter of the plaintiff ; they were both Involved in the consideration. That a contract had been entered in to, appeared in the letter addressed to the plaintiff ; .and whether it was broke:all o t be determined py a perusal of the sec On o. ; urithhotitaving 'recourse' tp parole testimony, the Jury might b atis fled thezdefendant had entered into a contract4simar= riage., acid had theriessdsr Irused to fulfil the en. mama. There could be no dOubt that it is the I dutjof every man, on subjects of this kind, to care that the object of hit • choke is pure ted.; he ought to be sure of that before he the contract—net after. - His I.ordihip understood to say, that circumstances mi; .swards come to the kno . wledge of a man, Lemke it imprudent in him to complete ' but, in point of lair, nothing :-..td bean urged in the t case, that could absolve the defilndant fron 's contract : therefore there ought to be a verXiat for the plaintiff; but a material consideration re. wined, and that .waf the amount of the damage; because, if, after the defendant had entered into the contract, he had discovered circumstances, so stro:.; and potent in their nature, as to induce a trian of reasonable and rational mind to suspect the worm:, lin though it would uot go to defeat the action ; yet ..t. ought to be thrown into the consideration of .the JL. , ~-. when they came to estimate the amount of dattrai.7.-:=. His Lordshii, then commented upon the svideoct. and observed, it did not appear that any fact occurrtei i between the defendant writing the letters to jestit! his breach of promise. By the defence, the drifead...r.: had recourse to the investigation of the plaintiff's conduct from her infancy; and endeavoured to extract from the whole of her lite a sufficient justification.— If the Jury feel the case, as proved, they were lriaunil to give such a verdict as would make reparation ; in doing which "they should be directed by their ju,!:- f . ment, and not by their feelings ; and they sllowd i make reparation to the one party, Without d0in , ,.., i:. 1 reparable injury to the other. The jury retired fop a few nhlautes, and reform::: .t ____ . ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTION. The Tin:v.*y of Glasrow have been please to eorl,r Degree of Doctor of Laws on the Rev. CharLiLloyd, of PO I , a in the CUULII ut OWL, k. MARRIED. The Rev. Robert Rennie, minister of Bortewstounnesc, t I Jean, eldest . daughter of Witham Orhart, Esq. naerchint, Glasgow. On the 20th uk. Captain Daniel' Reid, Commander oft' Prince Ernest Augustus caner, In the tervice cf the rcycritit Customs in Scotland, to Miss Katharine M'l.eod, of Is!and-i< cu. .1 • • Di F.I). Friday evening,. In. Abingdon-street, aged 75 Mrs. Ashley. relict of the late, and- mother of the present Managers ut t'ae Oratorios. At hi. houseln Wells-street, Oxford-street, early on Satar,!zy morning last, the releliratrd Tiberius Cavallo, hsti. F. R. S. &c. of pulmonary consumption, . 11 i Lie 6-t- h year of Lis Yesterday, at Ms house In Montague-street, lkussell,t, ; u::.r, William, Norris, Esq. At Ediriburzli, oa the 11th inst. Major Day'.4 Morriestx, of the lionourabk East India Compa:.):s Service. HIGH WATER AT LONDON 131.Z.IDGE-1411-MORito Morning • • 46 minutes atrer 6 Afternimit ..... ........ 8 minutes after 6 HEALTH and VIGOUR restored by that most excellent Mc..e. eine, THE COlt DIAL BALM OF piLEAI). Prepared by Dr. SOio/4 on, Gilead House, near Liverpool. r I 'HE CORDIAL BALM of GILEAD has btcn In repute to the very pinnacle of fame. Unistrsally is .t is reverted to in cases - of weakness and emaciationoio also are i.s h•ndgia and bealth.restotir.g qualities universal. Some, perh.tea, unacquainted with its virtues, not having perused that intereer Guide,' (which must be few indeed) may be it to what is the Balm of Gilead fit for ? what complaint doth it et.zi answer this is will be necessary to • " Hold up the Mirror to nature," Let those who are afflicted in the following matinee reer , 7 • -II the cause that produced such havoc upon the " w'tolesont. T:: and appetites of life." Disordered stomach, dry c, uss, . ,-uf the voice, hoarseness, shortnees of the breath upon t!o-i- , ,it exercise, and relaxation of the whole s) stem. Those alit - wits.: it ..n paleness, languor of the eyes, weakness of sight or memory, 5!1.1..; .1 taketime to consider Linnzus advice, "that youth is the itev , r • tant period of forming a robteit coastitntiou," and that " notienz it to be dreaded so much as premature excess." The found.ei of a happy old age is a good constitution In youth; temper oxe and moderation at that age are passports td happy grey Nothing can be better described than is the words of Areastii.i For want of timely care • Millions have died of medicable wounds." For such as these, then, this healing Balm is suitublo- , -C - .-1. plaints stifled under the iameleon appellation of ner.-lus anti. • sumptive, arc its proper climax ; the one it will era&eate—: other will be cured by Its influence. The Balm of Gilead produced more good in this country than any medicine since :.e formation of a Materia Medlca. Sold by all,respectable Medicine Venders in the United Kite;dc..-.. CHAI.I .F.NGE. • - • MESSRS. CU RR IE and Co. .Surgeorts, late his Majesty's Service, challenge the whole world to pre7 , a angle instance where their Medicine and,atethod of cur, Law failed of the desired effect. The practice Of nutty years ia particular branch of their prays/tun Ws not given rue to ~:+e unsuccessfel case. 'They continua to direct their studies to the treatment and cure of Venereal Complaints, and that deran,genuant of the syerra, which is the consequence of the pernicious and wasteful a habit long and mkt unhappily pursued by the you ha of heth In the one it will be found to be the unfailing source of ;vile:: nem ; the other have hi ravages fatally developed to !hely bya dressing state of debility, which, if not timely rem.: in impotence. 'llese are It. renfote Mid ultimate etr,c,s, whin. c,s sumptions,los. of muscular powcr i and various nervous zot.-velati usually characterise the earlier stages of this solitary vice. Of 1.4.:- solii languiehing under the disordsrs Incident to such a luthi:, .r treatment is simple and has never proved unsuccessful, is course of a long, I.thorious, and much extended practice. I. •.* nioat obstin . :re and complicated cases of venereal as obstruetions in the urethra, spongy excrescences, had :te. ntours, callous ulcers, eruptions, seminal weaknees o .gl e ets, a, :use S ItICTU RES, Whether recent or of long duration, and which have WTI -A 'tie skill of other Practitioners ; areby their present improve.) treatment, effectually and permanently cured, svithout thei , 4t suffering the excructating pain and alarming hemorriutv often follows the application of the lunar caustic. In the cuer+ . : 20 years extensive practice in this metropolis, nuitserous u se A Strictures have Ewen and are daily under their are, Cie t" . 4 eradication' of which are effected by a safe, certain • and expo , : tious mode of practice, superior to any other yet. adopted. weaknes s relaxation, afiddebility proceeding from this con:pl 4i :'' • lis speedily removed, and the patient re;tored to sound s. • gorous health. But where the debility has for years proper perseverance in their restorative remedies, after then cure has been destroyed, is indispensably requisite to revive .3 g slumbering sparks of life, anal to reanimate the Cmistiturion. Several Noble Men .aud Gentlemen, of the fit it respect.i.j l l* have been under the care of Messrs. Currie and Co. for r." Moral of complaints of the Urethra, Strictures,. &e. and, La:'4 afl . received a radical and permanent cure, recittan that.raftre '(# • May be Made to them as satisfactory evi dences of the deckel periority aaf Messrs. Currie and .M:2 plan of trearns, rt. J l..arf of these Gentlemen have bad Strictures from ten to twenty year+. and had been under the care of Meskrs. Home and and other . s of equal efiancocie, who attempted the by the appli t =ol the lunar caustic, without. success. Messrs. Currie and Co. maybe consulted by eh? greatest delicacy, secrecy, and honour, it their' Hatton-Gorden. Patients in the country are the particulars of their case, age;and general habit enclosing a remittance for advice and medicines, v w,lll,lte ;tics or sent to any part Of the kingdom. ' Tq ensure that secrecy io essential to their I" • poems of Litton may be added' to the account , Sltit June, teoo-7-107, Hatton Gordon. • LONDON : Printed altd pabliibed by Lgvx. emrinarrPhice, Lambeth, at the Sr* a-Orrtc, urea. Publish 14 also a the STAI-Oractl' kind, to tale and unvot. he enters into would not i;,• ight afk.El.. a, that wouid his contract; either ccz with •!•e it house, N 0.:.:. requested to f,:ice )abit of livizit,..S:ra es, when the :woe r Undertakinir, w C for medicioes. ------_. 1. KENT, of Ca. ice, No. 1, Ca:C Temple Bar.