Star. — London, England, 1819-07-20 00:00:00

CI 1 t ~' i til . ~ 1 . ' • . 1 purpose, and, as before, let receding forces he em ployed, what will be the effect ? The circular link will now he able to resist a greater force than before, havin g trio points of support ; but the unsupported parts will, by the effort of the said force, endeavour to assume a onedrilateral form, a change that can not be effected without a derangement of the matter in the link, which must rupture and destroy it.— such stays [stays with sharp enilsi have been used in chains ; but such -a stay only supra ts two oppo site points in the link ; and I have shewn that the tendency of receding forces, applied as before de scribed, is to straighten and consequently to rupture the parts that arc still left unsupported. ' My said improvements in chain cables or moorings are found ed on considerations drawn from the facts that have been alluded to. If a circular lick, instead el being supported crnly in the two opposite onus, have its Apposite sides supported by a : e ery nnibriteing o considi. , rable and opposite setments, taking can to leave such openings as shall allow sailiciely pia} fur the links to be received into it, the link will be roach stronger than with such a etay as A;;B, [the sleti p ended stay:: 13,1 still the link will pr, ye to be of bad iie-m ; for the tendericy of receding forces, ap plied as before, would break the link over the nti.: links as fulcrums. :And moreover, even if circu lar ;inks could be mad.: tinob]ectiehable as to strength, they should be avoided, on• account of the greater Weight of metal which a given linth of chain would require, than when formed of links of a less excep tiorahle form. We have seen that the tendency of receding forces, applied to curved links, is to draw portions of them into straight forms; and hence it follows, that twisted links of every kind should be Avoided where strength is required ; for such links, even if their opposite sides be supported, by an interposed stay, like AGB Ea small ended stay, must, by the application of a sufficient strain, untwist themselves to become straight, and thus have the arrangement of their pi rticles disturbed. —As the tendency of forces applied at heft re men tioned to curved or twisted links is to convert the curves or distortions into straight portions, as above' described ; it follows, that links presenting in their original construction straight parts between the points of strain, are the strongest that can be made with an equal portion of metal ; and hence, links with pa rallel sides and semi-circular ends would in every case be preferred, 'e ere it not necessary to the quality of good chain, that it should be able to resist lateral violence as well as a general strain operating by stretching. Suppose that by any accident the link figure ‘2, (a link with parallel sides) should be drawn against a resisting body, the side of the link next the resistance would be bent inward ; and if in Such a link a stay like AGB (sharp ended) were intro duced, then the link wotild be solicited by the said force to assume a form which would destroy it. From the preceding considerati ins it is Cs ident that, of all the forms and constructions that pan be given to a link, that form and construction which shall be able to convert a lateral into an end strain, by yielding ugroper support to the opposite sides of the link, is! se one that should be preterred—and of such a form and contructioa is the link figure 5, with my broad ended stay introduced between the sides of the link el 1.4 r, if this link (which .presentsits principal substance' and all its points of r esistance in the same place) [plane] be diem against obstacle it is apparent, that the parts which are supported by their opposite parts, must be drawn asuieder before the link can give way. For the matter in the part to which the obstacle is presented cannot be Miele to penetrate itself, and the two sides are cornyelled to retain their relative posi tions by ivy interposed broad-ended stay, a cross section of which thiough its middle is shewn in a figure. I 'iced that at the time that the stay is i.:tradaccd, the link is wide enough to receive it ; and the li,ek being red hot at the time of its introduc tion, and being essed home to the stall by a dye or prc.is, or aey suitable mechanical .means, takes a fast hold of it, and retains it in its place. Other ways of introducing and retaining in its place my broad ended stay may be employed; but I have found the preceding exceedingly simple and efficacioUs.— OU my broad-ended stalls I have only inrthcr to remark that they should embrace the whole or the greater por tion ve the opposite cue red parts ?I' the middle o/ - the lirufc ; and even ifthe middle ()nide link be made tofirm tu,o apposite obtuse angles, the ends rif the stay should nol embrace much less than the proportion exhibited in _figure 5. But in making the said ends to embrace any larger portions, provided sufficient room is lsfl for the play o s tMe links nceived into it, there will be no harm ; only-the chain as ill thereby be rendered heavier, which may sometimes, though not generally, be desirable." Mr. HART stated thk it was impossible not to un derstand such a description as this, taking all the parts together, or the stature of the improvement de scribed. It had been contended that the expanding of the head of the stay was in itself a thing so obvi ous that it could not be considered an invention ; but this was the case with almost every great mechanical improvement. When pointed out it was found to lie so near the surface, that every one wondered they had, pot seen it before. This was the case in Arkwright's invention—he added only some little wheel, the ad dition of which to the previous machinery, was so obvious that any weaver, or common mechanic, might have hit upon it. Inventions were not the less useful for being simple. On the contrary, this qua lity added to their value. CHANCELLOR asked what was particu ted to be claimed as the invention? . 7 —The stay described, which the paten- , broad-ended stay, is new, and verydiffe stays before in use. These supported only points of the link, but the Patentee, by out the head of the stay, making it small middle, that room may be left for inserting ':s, gives complete support to the entice ides. Ile would quote, he said, the words ration (The Philosophical Magazine), in )y.of the patent had apprared—. JWELL remarked, that the statement. to Learned Brother wished to refer could being drawn up, as was believed, by 7ho drew the specification. cr.—The words, ho►rever, may be used by .thout even pretending to be deeply skilled Al science, and I will use them as my own, "them quite correct:—" Mr. Brunton's spe ' his invention is at once so explicit and at 1 . - . The LORD ‘ . intender , . lax l y . • Mr. HART, tee calls his i , . rent from sta 1 ! t wo opposite • 'l' spreading oul . , est in the mii the next link! , opposite side! . - -of a Pablicai . 11 which a copy Mr. SHA DI 'which his L _ 1 :... .. haveno weit, 1 • t 1... person se] IVIIAtAllii any Dna titth an 4ne?.liattical Tot' ribinkiN cification of k . . ~:, ... the same time drawn up in such apop‘larform, as to preclude the possibility of his prkciple boing understood." The LORDCHANCELLOR—I observe in this pamphlet EMunton's and Middletoll'S Observations on Chain Cables] a kind of admission of which' the defendants would probably like to avail themselves. Theconclud ing paragraph runs thus:—" We shall he happy if we are in any degree the means of promoting the adoption of chain cables ; and though we ate prepared to sup pot t the Patent we have fairly obtained, we shall al ways rest our claims more tspon the attention to and the soundness of the work done, at our Manufactory, than upon the possession of any exclusive right. The more chain cables really cticc:ive, that are in use, the better we shall consider our true interests pro snoted."—W hat do you say to this? Mr. IIAnT--The pamphlet is neither more nor less than an invitation to customers to come to their Manufactory ; and it is common in such productions, from articles or the greatest im portance down to quack doctor's pills, to speak in high terms of what is offered to the Public. The advertisers in this instance, offer not oily the advama,ge of their patent improvement, tut boast of superiority in other respect:, as Irons better workmen, or better materials, which, independent of every other conside ration, should obtain for them a preference. Mr. GIRD! ESTON followed on the same side. Ile remarked that the Patentee was put in an aukward situation by having to meet new matter brought forward in the ansWer of tke Defer. darts. For example, the mooring chains made fcr the City Of London. lie was enabled, however, to state, that though they had stays, they were not such as the Patentee bad described, not broad ended, but only supporting the opposite parts of the mid dle of a long link, The Patentee's stays, as had before been stated, filled the greater part of his links, and, it. the words of the specification, embraced the whole or the greater portiun eight °mate curved rarts of the middle of the link," leaving only suffi cient room for the interposed adjoining links to move freely in, which was a new and useful improvement; no stay of like effi cacy having been before in use. The Loan CHANCELLOR here remarked, that the Specification, in speaking of tl e invention, employid the plural term" impeore. rum's," and asked what other improvement or improvements *had been introduced by the patentee? A patent by its very title profes,:es to be for one invention ; here anchors, windlasses, and cables are described. These, however, might be considered one in vent:on—a contrivance to fasten or tic a ship; bot where improve- MelliS, in :hr plural, are mentioned, they should be so set forth. Mr. GIiII , I.ESTON said that the stay was not only new, but by being intredficed into the link, the link itself was improved, whether round or of whatever form ; but the patentee had also specified improvement in the form of the link. Lord &ram—That is a better ground to take. blr. GIROLESTON.—Our description goes expressly to forte, as well as to the stay and even were the specification thought not the most perfctt, it will remain for Plaintiff, if the points' of law go [satire a Jury, to prove the validity of his specifica tion. We have no wish to have the injunction continued, if in the event .( obtaining a verdict, we are secured in having an account of the profits. The Loan CHANCELLOR remarked, that in this case, it did not appear that the Pt.,intiff had enjoyed that undisputed occupancy of his Patent, as lids could be considered as a kind of r uhhc ac quiescence in his right ; for it appeared that, ever sinc e t h e d ate o f the Patent, the Def,:ndants bad ben in the habit of making Chains with stays like those of the Patentee. In cases of undisputed occupancy and public acquit-cc:ice, it was not unusual, in dissolvieg an injunction, till tbe prams of law might be decided on by a Jury, to ender defendants to keep an account of the quantities manufactured in the interim ; but this not being a case of that hind, his Lordship would not, he said, lay on the defendants that which they apprehend, d might be a prejudice in another Court, as carrying with it a kind of o; iron that they had something to account for; nor, on the other hand, would be have it understeod that, by not granting this to plaintiff; he was giving any opinion, eller against or in favour of the va lidity of has patent.-114 Lordship therefore directed that the Injunction should be i'.isrAvicl, the plaintiff to bring his action law, and with liberty to him to apply to have the L' junction renewed, should he succeed in his action. ‘'ICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, JULY 19. THE MA RLI3OROUGII GOLD PLATE. THE EARL OF S/lAFTESBURT AND OTIIERS T. HIS GRACE TIIE DUN F. OF MARLBOROUGH AID THOS. TRIPHOOK. Sir ARTHUR Procorr stated, that the Motion i❑ this case s;cod over, that the Ni:Lle defendant might put in his answer, or file an aai,:avit, explanatory of the circumstances relative to gcl.d plate being out of his possession. His Grace had that morning put in his answer; he therefore had to request of his Honour, that he would allow the Motion to stand over until Wednesday. The VICE-CHANCELLOR—" I expected his Grace would have filed an affidavit, making such a disclo sure as would have enabled the Noble plaintiffs to have amended their supplementary bill ; but perhaps, the answer makes a full disclosure. I cannot allow the Motion to stand for Wednesday; I have never yet allowed the regular business of.the Court to be broken in on. The best way will be for Mr. Bell now' to state the substance of his Grace's answer." Mr. BELL then stated that his Grace, after admit ting the rights of the parties in his answer, admitted that there were two swords belonging to the great Duke of Marlborough; that one of them was in the possession of Lord Churchill, and the other (the dia mond SV. ord) the Noble Plaintiffs Kad gained posses sion of, it having been seized under an execution by a creditor of his Grace. He also acknowledged that he had allowed the defendant, Triphook, to remove the gold plate in question from Blenheim, for the purposes of raising a snm of money on it, and to have the arms of Churchill engraved on it. That he (his Grace) had kept, and had then in his possession, one plate, one spoon, and one knife and fork, being part of the gold plate which he had kept as patterns, and that it had been his intention to have had the gold plate returned to Blenheim before the Anniver sary of the Battle of Blenheim, when he intended to entertain his neighbours, but was prevented by the suits which had been commenced in that Court against him, which restrained him from receiving. the rents or cutting down the timber of the estates, by which means he was unable to pay the persons employed on the estate, and made it necessary for him to raise money. He denied that he ever autho rized the defendant, Triphook, to sell, pawn, or melt the gold plate, but that he told him to deposit them with a silversmith. That he believed the defen dant, Triphook, had been deceived by the person whom he had entrusted with the gold plate.--1 That Triphook had informed him, that he had depo sited the plate with a silversmith, in the neighbour-: hood of Lincoln's Inn-fields, and that he had lodged it in a banking-house, but that his Grace was ignorant of the names of the silversmith and banker; that Triphook had informed him that the silversmith Was. gone to Wales, Yorkshire, or elsewhere in the cows-. try; that having heard that some of the plate was offered to be pledged and for sale, he applied to Triphook on the subject, who informed him that it, was without his sanction, and that he had .taken it from the person who had so exposed it; and-that he, (Triphook) had the gold plate then in his possession, and that he would on a certai'a day return it to Blen heim, but which be had neglected to do. He acIH , mittcd that he had raised the sum of 12 or 1,300/. • tin the gold plate, but denied afgthe had ever order ed it to be offered for sale to Mr. Gue.t or Mr. Robert SYllbion Cox. Believed the solid plate was presented to the great Duke by. some toreign Potentate; denied that the plate was in danger of being sold by him ; on the contrary, he most anxiously wished to pre serve it according to the will vi the Noble Testator. Vlce-CHANCELLOR—" Is the Defendant Triphook a party to the supplementary Bill?" Sir A. Ptubot answered in the affirmative. The VICE-CHANCELLOR--.-" I am considering, Sir Arthur, how I can teach this case. Let the plate, spoon, knife, and fork, admitted in the answer to be in possession of his Grace, be delivered up. It the Defendant has been served with a notice of the in junction, which I suppose he has, I can make no further order as it respects him until he puts in his answer. You had better, cn the facts contained in the answer of his Grace, amend the supplementary bill and insert in it the clause of the will which gives the Trustees the controul over these articles: I think at present I can do no more ; certainly the person who is entitled to the rents and profits of the Marl borough estates will be made by this Court to replace whatever articles are missing, but I cannot make an order to that effect, as the bill is now framed. My order then is, that his Grace shall lodge, with the Mas ter, or with the Ranker cf the Earl of Sht , ftesbuiy, the articles of gold plate which he admits to be in his pos session, and that the Plaintiffs amend their hill, with out prejudice to the injunctions already granted." COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JULY 19. ASSAULT AND FALSE IMPRISONItII:NT. ANDROS V. ANSTICE. This was an acticn for assault and fal. , e imprison ment, stated in the declaration to have been commit ted by the defendant, upon the plaiiitiff, upon their voyage from Lndia to this country. Mr. Serjeant litynLocK opened the pleadings. Mr. Serjeant VAL:on/ix stated the case. The plain. tiff was, he said, a Lieutenant of the 65th Regiment, and had served in many campaigns in India, from which country his physicians found it necessary that he should he removed in consequence of the bad state of his health. For this purpose he took his passage on board the Henry Porcher, East Indianian, of which the defendant was Captain, and having paid the sum of 1760 rupees (about £T2O), had the privilege of abiding in the toddy. Before the ship reached St. Helena a dispute arose between the plaintiff and de• fendant,.which terminated in personal violence, and had nearly terminated fatally. The quarrel, which was occasioned by some unfortunate error with re spect to the conduct of the steward, produced a chal lenge ftorn the plaintiff to the defendant, which was acted upon in the Island, by a discharge of three shots from each side. The interposition of the seconds prevented any further experiment of skill, and the matter having been considered amicably adjusted, the vessel advanced upon the remainder of her voy age, which was, however, rendered exceedingly rious to the health and feelings of the plaintiff. A young gentleman named Warton, of literary acquire ments, who was a passenger in the ship, and had wit nessed the dispute, wrote a letter, animadverting upon the conduct of the defendant, but tor 2 it in compliance with the request of the plaintiff; whose generosity would not allow any reflection to be cast upon his antagonist. The disposition of the defend.' alit presented a most extraordinary contrast, for 'tliat gentleman degraded himself by picking upthe scraps", and reading the contents, after w hich he interdicted the writer, who was a charter passenger, the privi iege of walking the gnat ter deck. The plaintiff, be tween whom and Mr. Warton an intimacy subsisted, having observed that indignities were thrown upon his friend, invited that gentleman to his cabin ; and this invitation gave rise to the conduct v hich the witnesses would prove to be oppressive and tyranni cal in the last degree, and which loudly called for heavy damages.---The following witnesses were then called : William Johnson, a sailor on board the Henry Porcher, deposed, that in the month of April, four or five days after the ship had left St. Helena, he received order 4 from Mr. Wallace, the first mate, to get a cutlass and stand Lenny over the plaintiff, whom the Captain ordered to be confined to his cabin. Witness told the plaintiff that he must confine himself, for if he (witness) did not obey the order he should get three dozen. Witness was attended by a comrade, who was also armed with a cutlass, and had orders to the same effect. They were relieved by two others, and the imprisonment lasted till they came to this coast. After the plaintiff had been con fined three weeks, he was allowed to walk tie decks from seven till eight in the evenings, guarded by a soldier. The side on which he walked was the lee side ; the other officers walked on the other side. Cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant Con.Ev.—There were several other Office:s on board. The sentry who guarded him did not walk about t' .h him, for that v.ould be tire ome. J. Ryan, a passenger in the Indiaman, heard the defendant give orders for the plaintiff's confinement. The plaintiff's cabin. was very small, there being scarcely room to turn round in it, and the weather was extremely hot. There was a small aperture in the cabin through which the air was let in, but when there came en a breeze, that aperture was necessarily closed, to prevent the sea from beating in, and the place was in total darkness. The plaintiff's confine ment commenced the Bth of April ; and or. the 9th of June, when the ship arrived at Portsmouth, it ter minated. the Lieutenant having been attended to the gangway by his sentry, and from thence landed with the other passengers. .Dtiring the first week of the plaintiff's confinement, he had been treated very badly. His diet was sent tO him in one plate—fish, flesh, fowl, potatoes, and other articles, and no cloth was laid for him. Before this he used to dine with the other Officers in the cuddy. Alter the first week, separate plates and dishes were sent. to hilt). Claret was allowed to the ruddy •pasengers. Plaintiff was allowed red wire, but he could not tell of what kind Cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant BOSANQUET.— Plaintiff was allowed Madeira and traady ;a small coMplement of: the farmer.- l'ever .ask for 'any.. . " . • A part owner of the Indianian stated, - that he un derstood- from the clefendany`thatlle'llad received £220 fica.,* v a c small price • for the voyage fron. Boni - bay, but the defendant said he had accepted the reduced fare in. consequence of the recorumendatiun of a mutual ' friend. The defendant also said that the plaintiff 4 4 come to this country in consequence of ill health. Mr. Serjeaet COPLEY.—Witness never heard th. the plaintiff's health had suff ere d b y the 50 r ,,,,, ' 4l Mr. Serjeant VAUOtiAte.--Not at all! l'eri:X.ps,, was improred by it, the treatment Val 40 gentle ; ..; ... the plaintiff n ight be thankful for the car e si n l i t i l'T was taken chi him ! A letter was then put in and read. It tea s F,,,,, the defendant to the plaintiff, and stated, that ~,:t: latter had acted in defiarce of orders, and instig e „i another person to do so, he was to consider i:ehi•.• under arrest :fed confined to his cabin, from sh.. the writer forbade him to pass. Th e note was diki 7th April, 1819. This closed the evidence fo:i, plaintiff. Mr. Serjeant Constar was crilte surprised th a t• wl learned brother should call this his case. Tee „ • of evidence to be called upon the part of tie 41:,,.• 1Y dant would prove, that Captain Anstice was , ei t . : : ,., !!. I in his original design, though perhaps rot i co!.; 1 nuing the imprisonment of the plaintiff. He du. 1 lupon the example which the violent spirit of 1 'plaintiff and Mr. Wanton was holding cut to At 'crew, and represented the neces.ty that a Cap -, should have a great cont./m.)l or 4 ::oard, in order i b, protect the properties and lives of those under • caie. The Learned Counsel admitted that tlteLm N, t nant, A ier ,S, was ete Lied to d.rn tgeS, but Ow la those homages should be merely nomil al. John Watts, an Officer on board, s a.ed that :4 : Wanton was a charter-party pa - senie: ; and than's ! T Captain had given orders, on the 7tls of Apiil, • he should not be allowed to go into thr s:eerage. p t 11 that day, however, the plaintiff invited Mr. Wan, 4ii saying to him, 44 Foliow me, now, and let me se who.will . stop you." The two Gentlemen then ve l into the plaintiff's cabin, and witness repented de . orders had been broken to tie chief officer. 1 ii crew were not very orderly at the time. Terence Kavaitabh, steward to the Indman,* is • the plaintiff and Mr. W ar ton w alk i nto the stens! 1 together. 1.1 Richard Wallace, ,first Officer, stated that Ile Walton was allowed to mess with the Midsinprre, through his application to the Captain, .and in cuis sequence of a quarrel requested to be allowed to sea between decks, which was granted. Subsequeni a message was sent by one at the Officers to him cc to go into the steerage. When the plaintiff induce Mr. Warten to violate the orders, two messages wee .•• _ sent to him by the Capt a in, b ut t h e y were tre t• 3l, with sidicule and contempt by Lieutenant Andra e who wrote toahe Captain, " You may imprison* 11 and depiive me of the advantages for which ycu a a paid ; but I will not be imprisoned except by fettle 'I his witness said the diet of the plaintiff wasasgoot as possible. .::7, A letter from the plaintiff was put in, which ss.• . of the ill effect s the confinement had upon his heal 1 1 and requesting some mi t i gat i on o f t h e d e f en d& e severity. it was then that the plaintiff was allow., to walk the deck upon certain conditions, with wh•-' however, he did not voluntarily comply, at.d is :. Glaring that he would not do so, he assured the C . tain that he should have recourse to the law. s!. Cross-examined by t r. Set 'cant V 411C1t A N—Plais tiff appeared to have -what other passengers had,.:i what he asked for. . Serjeant VAIiGIIAN--" Had other peollitinexad lewiding on the same plate?" Witness—" I had not, nor do I believe tl r i had. Mr. Warton complained of the languegr i the mess, and was at his own request removed. Tx discipline of the crew was not good, but witness di not impute that to Mr. Warton.' Several Officers of high rank in the East Inch s:. Company's service, stated, that the Captain did w Fa •• seem to be influenced by improper motives in ea e• fining the plaintiff. 'II Lieutenant Babington thought indeed that NIL it rs Warton was not fit to be associated with by the Gas tlemen, because he happened to be a charter-Fito l passenger. Mr. Serjeant Vauou.aw had some amass • ment with this witness. The Csu ILItsPIOE summed .up, and after soot 1 .1: severe comments upon the tyrannical conduct of tlx defendant; left the case in the lands of the Juts • whom he besought to consider it dispassionately. The Jury immediately gave a verdict for the Flail, .. tiff—Damages Five Hundred Pounds. NEW 0 A TE, Aso LE A DEN II ALL MARK ETS,JULIII t- (By the Carcase.) Beef :s led to 48 10di Veal 46 4d to Si li _ illtr.ton 4s id to 5s Od Pork sts 44 to 6s I • Lamh, 51 Od to 6s Od. PRICE OF HOPS. NEW RAC!. NEW I'OrICITS. Kent Susst.x I.:s set Foreign ... 21 108 to 41 Os Farnham PR ICE or TAI.LOW, SOAP, &c. per 112:b. , Town Tallow 67s 6.1 Ditto rtrogh Yellow Itutth ... ... 66g Od Yellow Soap . Whitt ditto Soap ditto Melting Stuff... ...... ... 546 ed I Palm • _0 PRICE OF CANDLES—From •• ow 12 Hat --- T:11 ei . eirs' Candles, per duz. 12s od—MouldS, 1:4 ed; ti.l. per doze q allotted for ready r00r.,,y. r _ se COAL MA RK ET, Jui..7 19. Ships at Market. Ships S)ld. Price. 9 Newcastle n ' O ( ; 6d to 40s Si ~ 4 Sunderland .4 • '3l. 6d to .:Os W 1 Culm 0 • —s ed to . B urn!. On the 10th incr. at Leith, Mrs. Captain Ramp. P ,lll • Nte), of a daughter. -...- • MARRIED. ~ In All S"ints Church, Londenderry, Lie - rtenant F-e:.* , :a E. Stute, late of the I Brlt Royal Irish Regiment, to Doto!ar- : secend daughter of William Paterson, of Mason Lodge, :co! Donegal, Egq. . 1 mintTu col Artillery, .sy, at La t v o er °c s-1 i Catherine,i k I dine, Esq. of Harwood. -- DIED. s j e o c l o m ndci r a ec ti t gh ' t r e; cl O: it li ‘ c 7 l l.ls ageYdes2ter years, , af s t t e c r on a d sh s o o r n t o i f lin T e li sg e , m 7l as fr. n T c : s il a li r z d ro n l c lT E r i x t. John -street, Pentonville. • Ego,. of Fernaey, Ireland. VI. ter A ot t ' N J: w hn :4ll ; : od v e ' rs mi gst til l. S:trall Pan , say, the holy of lieutenant James itar.l.:ty, .:' • 1 4th inst. Miss Isabella Anderson. d:144. • Monday se'sulight.,.l:liialvrila. youognst laughter of T. 1), "' I ( 0 1 1 T o 7r u c ro h l - . l l:;: a .t t : t i . ” l d l i e a te c n o n r..•p a I . l t7s ilb St .) . rt ll a clo m i l ia "v ll.l l ; ll :7 t l r i " Fag, Surgeon, R..hi, ger.)ort. , , twining Department, at Vutismuutli, after w lone cce to. Tue>slav, at Ftsitten,iolin Motes. - .1 -------... try I cm Koh 1 N LONDON . Printed and published . Geljfinch, F.sti. late of t.hrli:•2; Place, Temple-Bar.