Star. — London, England, 1819-02-25 00:00:00

I I • . '7/ 44 ii t i~ 1 t - , , -~ I s / 4 1 posed, although he was anxious that such a provision should be made, he would not agree to it till he had taken legal advice on.the subject (Cheering.) When he found that it could be done, he communicated the circumstance to the Petitioner, and told him he was happy that a provision had been made for him, and hoped that he would not now be under the necessity of blowing out his brains. The allowance made to the Petitioner was £2tl) a-year, and the whole etno laments of the office did not exceed £lOO, although they had been stated to amount to double that sum ; so that thins proeision, in fact, was one-half of the whole emoluments. When he'communicated this to the Petitioner, he did not expect that he would aftee wards s.ty—" What! take £•l00 a•yearl—No; give me 000." The Petitioner said that he refused this allowance; but a few days after it had been offered to him, he (Mr. Quin) did understand,, from commu nications with his friends, that he was perfectly satis fied, and with th.tt dependence he had left Ireland. The petitioner having stated that he had legal chums on the office, he had given him every time that was, retetisite to inquire into these claims. On his return to Irel ind, he received a letter from Carew Smith, expressing a wish to wait on him for the purpose of discussing the subject. He had told him in reply, that he had made up his mind on the subject, and that he !mane to carry his resolution into executihn.. Smith, however, did wait on him, and they discussed fie subject over and over. Some time after, Smith sent under cover to him a minute—whether that wldch had been read to-night was a correct copy or not, he did-noraknow ; perhaps it was correct: and a few hours after, when he had looked it over, he gave it back in the presence of a third person—(hear, hear) and told Smith that Grady might vote as lie pleased. His very words were, " that he was free as the air"— (loud cheers). He told them that he had nothing to say as to that minute, and, in fact, he had not kept a copy of it. Having gone into the country next, day, the petitioner came to him, and said he under stood that he (Mr. Quin) had attached certain stipu lations -to the provision which it was .proposed to allow him. A neighbour was present at this inter view, and in that person's presence he had told Grady, that if Sneith had said so, he had said what was wrong. He had stated to him explicitly that he would have no bargain, and that he might vote as he pleased---(hear, hear). Grady offered him the votes of his freeholders, but he rejected the offer at once—(cheers); and now this accusation was brought forward do that very ground. It had been said that he had acted thus from the fear of parliamentary in• quiry ; but he declared on his honour, and as a Gen tleman, that he had never heard such an insinuation as that a parliamentary inquiry would be instituted if L accepted the votes of these freeholders. It had . been said, that Carew Smith had told him, that if he did not restore Grady to the office, or increase 'his allowance to A:SOO, these votes would be made the subject. of inquiry before Parliament ; but he so lemnly denied that Smith had ever told him so— (hear, hear). It had been represented, that the peti tioner was indignant at, the proposition which had been made to'him, and that he had refused to corn promiee the matter. Let, the House judge of the truth of this from a letter written by the petitioner himself :-44 I have had a liberal offer, and I accept the offer for myself; but I must first consult my cousin (Carew Smith)', as that is a compliment which I must pay him"—(hear, hear). Wben• he told the petitioner that he would have nothing.to do with his votes, there was a third person present ; and if that person were examined, it would be found that his statement was correct. If the House would perridi Mm, lie would let them into a little of the true his tory of this affair. The ostensible motives from which this complaint had originated were before the House, but he would endeavour to develope the real motives from which it had proceeded. The father of the petitioner lived at Boulogne, havirt quitted Ireland for certain reasons which he should not state. Oa the 19th of October, he received the first of a series of threatening letters—(hear e hcar).-which was to the following effect :—" Sir, under leave, you have here a copy of a letter from me to a leader of the Opposition, with whom I have been eight days, in London. lie has furnished me with extracts and precedents, and I have put myself under his direc tion. I deprecate the use of threats, but I will give you good advice. I advise you to restore my son to his former office—(hear, hear)—before the month of January next. Inform me whether you intend to take this advice. If you return no answer, I hail conclude that you have rejected it. Your answer, or your ao-answer, will he here before the 12th of No vember." Another letter from the same person com pared him to the figures of Sin and Death 4 the gates of hell. Sir ROBERT WILSON asked, if the name of the Member alluded to was mentioned? Mr. QUIN said that no name was given : he was Galt called a leading Member. Sir ROBERT WILSON said, it was obvious that it could not be himself—(u laugh). Mr. WINDRAM QUIN resumed his extracts from the letter:—" When you gave the memorandum, you delivered to us your political death-warrant '.—Hear, hear, hear). The Member of Opposition, who has came over on a visit to Me, has assured me of the ready concurrence of all the Members of Opposition in our favour; and to the Opposition Members you havemade yourself particularly obnoxious !"—(Hear, hear). With regard to having rendered himself par ticularly obnoxious to the Opposition Members, he believed the assertion as false as the threats of the petitioner's father and Fs adherents were contempti ble and impotent. lndepeadent of political impar tiidities, there were in: Oentlemen whom he knew, that he would sooner - ,ave to form a Committee to try the cause. He would as soon have a Jury of Gentlemen from the Opposition as any Jury on earth. They were men of character, and independently of party prejudices, were as conspicuous for honour, integrity, and purity of principle, as any description of •men that could be mentioned--( Very loud cheer ing). The Boulogne Correspondent, namely, the faDierof the petitioner, in the plentiUide of his mai desceasion, was pleased to ;fford some respite horn the fulminatierns win + were prepared to frighten him (Mr. 4bsin) from his propriety ! The time for the aosseer was enlarged from the 10th of November to the sth Deoember! Mr. Quin, feeling the soli dity of his propositsou, and the correctness of his condisct• exclaimed—l am not afraid o f any Parlia mental". Inquiry. To all the threats and &minds tions of the petitioner and his friends, I hid the ut most defiance. My character stands on other grounds, Mid cannot be injured by the.calumnies which have been so,industriously propagated. Even when I have defeated nty adversaries, I cannot claim any tiiumph or victory. For contemptible Indeed .must be the cause of that man, who can claim a victory over a person who has neither truth , honour, nor patriotism. Such are my sentiments, Mr. Speaker. and to the judgment of this Honourable House do I commit myself—( Long an I laud cheering). Mr. Quin, after his animated vindic ition, immediately retired. Sir ROBERT WILSON .wished to assure the House that he had never hea4of the Petition till the week before it was pre,ented—(hear,hear)—and con? sequently he could not be the person mentioned by the petitioner's father—(hear, hear). With regard to the statements contained in the petition, it Was not for him to give an opinion on them. They appeared to be questions of fact, and as such could be sub stantiated or disproved only by evidence. He was not prepared to say what mode of proceeding would be proper, and he would take the sense of the House on the subject. Ile should propose that the matter be referred to a Committee. Mr. PETER MOORE thought, that notwitht standing the able defence of the Honourable Gentle man, they should proceed to the inquiry, because it was a question in which the House was evidently Implicated. Mr. WYNNE, in justice to the honour of the House, was clearly of opinion that an inquiry ought to be instituted. If the allegations were true, they formed a'breach of privilege, and called for the in terposition of the House if false, it would appear as one of the most wicked and abominable conspiracies ever heard of. Ile proposed an Amendment, that the matter of the Petition be beard at the Bar of the House. Sir ROBERT WII.SO* readily acquiesced to this Amendment, which, with leave of the Honourable Member, he would leave as the Motion ' withdrawing the original one which he had proposed. He con. eluded by seconding Mr. Wynne's amendment, which now stood as the motion. Lord CASTLEREAGH thought, that as the ca lumnious and threatening letters had received a com plete refutation from tke Honourable Member's able speech, he saw no reason for troubling the House any more on the subject. It was evident that there. had been no grounds for the charges ; and he never beard a case better made out than that by the Ho nourable Member who had just retired. His Lord ship, however, would not oppose the Motion. Mr. WYNNE improved his Motion, by adding, that the matter of the Petition be heard at the Bar of the House on Monday fortnight. A conversation now ensued on the propriety of summoning all the parties concerned to the Bar of the House. The speakers were—Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. WYNNE, Mr. C. HUTCHINSON, Lord CASTLE REAGH, Sir JOHN NEWPORT, Mr. TiERNEY, MT. BEOUGHAM, &c. &c. when the parties were ordered to appear at the Bar to answer any question put to them. Mr. WYNNE afterwards suggested, that the in quiry, in justice to the honour of the House, ought to be as speedily as possible. He therefore proposed Monday se'nuight.—.The letter having been read, Mr. W. QUIN verified having received it, though there was no direction upon it. Mr. COURTNEY, whatever he might think of the offence which the letter constituted, wished at pre sent to take no further step than to secure hlr. Grady's attendance, that he might hereafter be forth coming when wanted. lie therefore moved that Mr. Grady be summoned to attend at the Bar of the House. . The SPEAKER stated, that the regular course would be for the House in the first place to decide whether the letter was a breach of .the privileges or not? If it were found to be a breach of privilege, then an order for the attendance of the writer might be moved for. After a desultory conversation between Mr.Counr- NET, Sir J. NEWPORT, Mr. BATHURST, Lord CAST LEREAGH, and Mr. W. Qom, who stated that he had 4ot the least wish of inflicting punishment, but that his only object'was to clear himself. Mr. WYNNE moved, that it be recorded on the Journals of the House, that " the writing and sending of the said letter to the Hon. Member, was a high breach of the privileges of the House." The motion was agreed to nemine contradieente, after a few observations from Mr. BROUGHAM. Mr. COURTNEY then moved, that Thos. Grady do forthwith attend this House, which was agieed to. Mr. COURTNEY, understanding that Mr. Grady was in attendance, moved thathe be called in. Mr. GRADY having been introduced at the Bar, The SPEAKER desired him to look at the letter, and to say whether it was his hand-writing ? Mr. GRADY took the letter, but said, that for 15 years he had been unable to read any hand-writing by candle-light. A light was then handed to Mr. Grady, and the SPEAKER repeated his question. Mr. GRADY could not make out the hand-writing, and had no recollection of having sent that letter to the Honourable Member. The witness having been ordered to withdraw, Mr. BANKES suggested the propriety of haying the letter read aloud to him, as he could not read it himself, that from its contents he might judge whether it was his own. Mr. MARTIN did rot see how hearing a letter read could enable Mr. Grady to ascertain whether it was his hand-writing. Mr. GRADY was then recalled. The SPEAKER directed him to attend while the letter should be read to him. The letter having been read aloud, The SPEAKER asked Mr. Grady, whether he now could state positively that he was, or was not, its author? Mr. GRAD? replied, that he had privately written about twenty sheets of speculative opinions upon the subject, but had not embodied them into any letter or publication. He had neves sent that latter to Mr. Windham' Quin. The SPEAKER bad or not written Mr. Gem,* did the shape of that 1 thiag of that :1 lisped it, or shown The SPEAKER I I could not deny hiving written something of the cha racter of the letter, though not in the terms of the present. Mr. GRADY.- 41 Or amounting to a letter addres sed, or to be addressed, to Mr. Windham Quin; or in the share of any letter. - The SPEAKEIi.—" Does the witness mean to say that he has neither sent, nor authorized to be sent, the letter which has been read Mr. GRADY had never written any thing in the shape of that letter. The witness was then ordered to withdraw. Lord CASTLEREAGH thought, that after what L had just passed, there was no other course to pursue than to order Mr. Grady to be taken into the custody of the Serieant at Arms, till a more favourable state of light should enable him to decide as to the iden tity of his hand-writing ; unless his Honourable Friend (Mr. Windham Quin), who had received many letters from Mr. Grady, should be able to settle the question. Mr. WINDHAM QUIN repeated, that he had no wish to bring down any punishment upon Mr. Grady, but that the letter which he had received was in his hand-writing. •Lord CASTLEREAGH rose to move that Mr. Grady be committed to,the custody of the Serjeant at Arras, as his hand-writing had been proved. The SPEAKER stated, that it was necessary first to record that Mr. Grady had strittn and sent the said letter. Mr, BROUGHAM thought that the breach of pri vilege had been completely made out. After a few words from Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. WYNNE, and Mr. Alderman WOOD, who contended that the sending of the letter had not been proved, whilst Mr. BATHURST maintained that its having' been received was sufficient proof, the suggestion of the SPEAKER was adopted, and it was otalered to be recorded oa the Journals of the House— ,, That Thomas Grady, in having written and sent the said letter, had been guilty of a high breach of privilege." BANKES then moved, that for the said offence Thomas Grady be committed to his Majesty's Jail of Newgate. The Motion was agreed to, and the SPEAKER di rected to issue his warrant accordingly. Sir ROBERT WILSON then moved, that Thomas Goold, Esq. Daniel Gavin, Esq. Richard Smith, Esq. Thomas Mansell, Esq. David Roche, Esq. and Tho mas William Grady, Esq. be directed to attend the House, with certain papers relative to the case, on Monday se'nnight.—Agreed to. Lord CASTLEREAGH postponed his Motion which stood for toanorrcov, respecting State Prisons, to Monday next. ' Mr. HOWORTH postponed the Motion repectinj India Affairs, which stood for to-morrow, till Tuesday fortnight. Generel HART snored for an Account of the Revenue pro duced by Small Stills, holding less than one hundred gallons, in Ireland.—Agreed to. On Mr. Alderman WOOD'. Motion, the Minutes of the Evidence taken this day before the House, on the case of kr. Grady, wire ordered to be printed, after a short conversation between Mr. Wens . ; Mr. P. blooaa, Sir RJIMIT Wissos, and Mr. Hirramossex, who considered the case a most extraordinary and hard one, and bad given no vote for the commitment of Mr. Grady. Mr. Jotimoii, from the Office of the Chief Szcretary for Ire hutd, presented at the Bar an Account of the Number of Per sons imprisoned in the several Jails of Ireland. Also an Aceount of the quantity of Wine imported into the same country.—Ur. dered to he on the table. A Petition was presented from several of the inhabitants of the County of Limerick, praying for an alteration or repeal of the Hearth and Window Tax.—Ordered to lie on the table. A Petition was presented from the Tanners of the couhty of Limerick raying that tite Tax particularly affecting their Trade might be framed as that on or before the year 1795, when they paid so much per pound weight—Ordered to lie on the table. CURWEN presented ; Petition frost certain Inhabitants of the County of Cumberland, praying fur an alteration of tile Poor Laws.—Ordered to lie on the table. Sir EDWARD KERRlSOMPresented the Report from tbe Committee appointed to consider a Hill for the batter Recovery of Small Debts.—Ordered to lie on the table. Sir JAMES GRAHAM obtained leave to bring in a Bill for the better lighting and Paving of St. Giles's i■ the Fields and St. George's, Bloontsbnry, both in the County of Middlesex. Mr. STURGES BOURNE presented his Bill for the Amend talent of the Poor Laws.--It was read a first time, and ordLrcil to be read a second time to-morrow. Sir H. PARNELL prevented ;I ; ctition from certain Tradtbi. tans of Ninah (Ireland), in favour of Roruan C..thu!ic . . . pation.—Ordeied to be printed, and to lie on the table. The Report from the Committee appointed to try the merits of the contested Election fir the County of Leitrim was pre. stilted, by which it is declared that Luke White, Esq. the sit sing Member, is fairly and duly elected ; that the Petition against him was frivolous and vexatious; but that the vindica tion of the sitting Member was neither frivolous nor vexatious. The Report was ordered to lie on the table. The SPEAKER intimated that Rickard Clarke, Esq. Peti tioner against the Return for Haslemere, had neglected to enter into his recognir . anee in the time allowed by the liouse.—The order for the further consideration of the said Petition was of course discharged. A Bill was presented for the better regulating and directing Vessels propelled by Stearn.—lt was read a first time, and ur dered for a secoud reading to-morrow. Sir JOSEPH YORKE. moved, that Edward Penny, Esq. have leave of absence for tne nsonth on urgent business. The Honourable Member, to corroborate his motion, stated that Cap tain Peliew was Commander of a three-decker! Mr. WYNNE thought that was no reason for cons•anting to the motion. Instead of persuading the House by stating that the Honourable Member was " Commander of a threseiecker," he (Mr. Wynne) recommended to the Honourable Mover to say, that the absence was requested on " private" business. It would aot be on " public" affairs, as the Commander of a three decker in time of peace had " no urgent public vocation." Sir JOSEPH YORKE endeavoured to vindicate the grounds of his motion, by assurances that Captain Pellew's absence, if granted, would be on " publi c " b us i ness . H e t h erefore worded bis motion " on public business." Lord CASTLEREAGH advised-the Honourable Moier either to withdraw his motion, or to say on what " public", business. The motion was then withdrawn, when the convocation eras dropped. Sir 11. PAIINftI. me to move that the consideration of the Drogheda laration I r ethion•be deferred— bus, on account of the scull number of Members present, ho pot up his intention, on the ar,gestion of Lord CAirtearann. Adjourned. WEST AILVSTER ELECTION. TZNTH DAY. The crowd which yesterday assembled before the Rusting, was no less numerous than it had been on any former day of the Election. The storm of snow which was falling at the time, seemed to be no im pediment to the Increase of their number. Several individuals in the Tubitucle most loudly declared their intention of bearing the a pitiless pelting of the whole the than they tine , and 4 orderly flohhottbe sltout 'titude felt in . heing haat:mired with their nap„., ' From the specimens which we have alread y l , our Readers of the monopoli z i ng sp i rit of we think it almost unnecessary to add, that m e i; was received in a very different manner. e was not seen upon the Hustiny,s all tles da y : . 1.1 " . quarter past four the number; were aasounced For Vr. LA/IN - - lcsl Mr. 11,1.11ot:sit -5.,7 Major Ca.krarralit . • - 37 Mr. HOCHOU3E then came forward amid I n a. reiterated cheerings. He commenced his hats by informing the Electors that the day had le bad day for then: in more senses than nee: e s , all, the weather had }seen so dreatiklly bad prevent many Electors, who had determined , their names in his favour, frarb i •conain; up LA poll; secondly, he had excited disappointment promising them great success in their exertions that day: when he made that promise, he ws, aware that it was to be a holiday at all the ' Offices, and consequently was unacquainted considerable number of persons employed vernment, who were to be hi-Might up in array them. He was equally unaware at that th the powerful interest which, during the last had been exerted in behalf of Sir Murray M. was to be exercised against them during the Election : because, though he knew that thr ncnts had the support of the Ministerial he was not aware that the coalition between had been so complete as it then appeared to to supposed that these were the friend; of real end independence, because it was to them Lamb principally appealed, in his addreo morninges Lamb is in afunk, 1 prrrei , ..e, voice in the mob : this occasioned great laul By calling upon his friends in that mann Whig opponent must mean to insinuate, th who had previously upheld the'dienity of 11 ster, had been the advocates d slavish pi and that Sir Francis Burdett, instead of bc•i: representative of the real wishes of the peapik been returned by the friends of false freedom._ The chief merit of the Whigs rested on the tion which they made to the encroachments Government; and as that was the case, he slit glad to know why the Whigs came forward present occasion against the Electors of Westmi who now returned two Members in opposhi, Ministry, instead of returning telly one Mean was the case in the days of Mr. Fox ? He understand • the reason why the Whig party merit, as he must again repeat, rested entire: opposition which they made to the Ministcrs, come forward to abuse the men who had p: Westminster from being degraded into a cinqi and from becoming little mere or less than miralty borough. He could not perceive ._re 1:1011 that they could have against the Eicc, Westminster, who had hindered, a Government didate from becoming their Representatiee, - were this—that they (the Whigs) had not been in to share the victory which had been achiev to participate in the nomination of the Candle ,had obtained it. Since 1807, Westminster ways returned two Opposition Members, who, they did not helong to the regular regiment, wars found on the same side of the House .. Under such circumstances, it might have teen petted, that when their nominee was exerting nerve against Sir M. Maxwell, ami when they doirt their utmost to support him in these exert:one the Whigs would have put their shoulders • wheel, and have misted them to drive awa' Ministerial Candidate. Nothing of this sort however, done. Durieg three months in whi' exerted yourselves nobly, and put such a face the matter as banished him entirely from the the): did not even stir a single finger in your . they preserved what they called an aimed neetrality, and said that they should like to see in what -- the Reformers would be able by themselves t the battle of the people against the Court. being the case, whatever good they might have or attempted to do, in their opposition to the ' they had done but little towards the Electors Westminster; in short, he could not help obi that their only merit was, that when tile Court didate had been fairly driven from the field ! exertions of the Independent Electors, the Whi treacherously come forward to rob them of wards of victory. This statement, thoueli its la: might be harsh, was a plaiiistatement withou, exaggeretiee, and was so palpably correct, would even appeal to their opponents to confil He would ask them boldly whether it was not • (e Yes, it is true, veer true," asserted from the As to their motives in bringing forward another Jidate, after the Ministerial Candidate had driven lion: the contest, he knew himself to insignificant an ebject to think that they rested against him ; they were directed eseainst paramount question of a Reform in Parliament, were, he believed, confessedly intended to ,' ciate the character of Sir Francis Burdett.—(' their object, and nothing else, " issued from the. Every man in the meeti ng whom he addressed, this to be the fact, and also knew that they . ployesl the intemperate rutfimi on the other the Hustings to assist them in effecting this infers purpose. After this,, it caeht not to elcite in any thinking mind that the Whig Candidate come forward, and in a tone of mock con, , should express his son ow that the HODO:1::. ronet was losing all his influence *MI the Elece Westminster. Ile would say nothing of the modest 7, of the delicacy, or the propriety of so pang as Mr. Lamb taunting them with the fall of established favourite; nor yet would he say lon the unhandsome conductpursuedbrthat Ils able Gentleman's friends and partisans tmy t ards 'respectable individual whose motives aasi actions so incessantly impugned ; he would only expel sorrow, that the Hononrable Gentleman should himself so far condescended as to become an ! instrument in the hands of others to rtiin a character which had been fairly earned by te long honourable exertion. Those who employed him so, would hve to rue the inteetperante of whir fled gu;11 v ; and would sooner or later haves to regret thef thee, standing forward as the advoeaus of the people, should have done all they could - a man who; more ,etstly than any oiler, ma r distisigutehed by use tide of the Man of the' As fax sts Westminster wits-coaccrued,itc . ;1 16 • in. "twin" dining the who e thenght, r ather ti Mt desired bite to t o y, whethe r he be deprived, of the usual entertainment which t itten the letter witithhad been rend, derieediront.tho et:aterical.exertions of the respeci s did not recollect wittinrony tildirin„ Candidates, No . i rwirplarAtds were exhibited, tat letter. fie might have written settee* ever, 'thing on n the 'most 'quiet a n d fn-th character; but Aid • imo arjafid toarscr i Ose I rAncis, ijurdett and Mr. HOMO i/Vitt it 1 4 1, "altiod4Alf ..etaPPO' B,ol4.o l l-6 1. ./liikOngs; A 'bud ill KER understeed hi. to imp. &WV or it ermisetelairedittlatilmetidlt *Kai their r h the dal Lao ay. p s i bee ce,l 141 , t ong sl as _ : hey 37 by lotie t i ,j, thi harars- al , des ad hi; • the a Ent e pre bad 2 , 1 , 4 ingc ed to--. - ntc up to . tic itmeat , , Lb+ ation s hat e was 71 e r st :he f ,, ,f t .t e , -.11 bl Li with 6 ! d by 6, ay zzlrel inv time, th 4 a m t Electin bust Ara t a rcs, he prrent ,ent heir epp a by partizar; Lae teen the% not g o be. He dish frecC:.-2- 1 to thlt of that • ing " .e, said a pon neater).— .ues gr.er, their all] that thr:e , ini IVesti l 4 z . pat. principle; •in f being the . N'Ple, haling reedora lat he oppn:. of ors of t.:e nish J . .ould cow 4ri el :le ht !stmir.tte; cle ;ion to Ee bac [ember, at Rl eid uct w tv, whom call ely on the Fos rs, should prevented • nqueltet, • I an :In • ..ty on :iectors of nent Can- ;, ezcqt it . teen called !ieved, or -t I;dacc who •:e nad .• to, thotra t, were c with :.t. 'teen ing every they were ..ilt Ciert•OnFy ers to the g away the sort was, ..n rhich yen. face ”pre Di, the iel3, eet lUT caase ; • h tt mar.nex s to fi7ht trt. Tiffs z lave done he Coult. lectors of ;bserving, cart CU- c: id by the Vhigs had • 6 S the lanzt:age hon., any that he n onErrn ot a fact? le crowd.) after Crb lad beta to be too • were CE- 7 , ainst dee tent, a:1 to dep:e- te Thar's • crowd.) sed, kaew had ent- er side of infarr e ate thio:ence, table ;lectors of modest". ng a rasa af a lax T a wolf ; lioncn:r• yards tae tkins they spn3sS hit 'Patti hoe a humble cbamar_, ;.vears a am to do hich the,' avr casc ulvoeays Id to rats might br e