Star. — London, England, 1819-05-21 00:00:00

,1: 11 oilY 1:113 1 i arl i o :0 ,11r tl 11 S (1 t;1 th ;Heil cad; d es , tllO rope re col nue ~Jar bear servl di,:r cep BC.; r. .e.,1 t cf tl the I own cove the 1311 Jun othe Porl But was the et but long suic of I at V 31a; dory not of ti and don and ever is li she the Bri, phs Le; c; Inh 1k 1 in: dis tin bu Mi thi (L P r II it U tr t! it k el tl 1 6- Di 0 :%* ,b h r • ;al to Rs tb h es A RI/ dl o arlder.) lf,however, Cientwom, t , were to propose the repeal. of : taxes that 10. ' wel t o bjectionable, there w. 044 be no era orf projects. He (CnLionel Wood) said, that he .„„tj mention another duty.....“. rouncia - L. , , cv eral parts —" Aldine it, twee it I", qiu kcfaa jj a , . ; , •f l ip,„: others.) The Excise duty on . C4pal e* . o ppressively, especially iik thaki4nwhi lt 1•::!unged; but the. Gentleman of his district, whom he was of thia,namber, made their own :. ,. ,,j ics !--(Hear, hear, hear!) He knew ii was an 1,.; practice, but it had been done in deliaace, of t h reat s of the Exeiseman-l/ear. hear, hear.)-... some instances, the Excise Officers, for a violation the Law, had taken possession of all' the mountain ... c a, and carried it for sale down tb the valley, but hard inflictions of the Excise had not terrified inhabitants. The duty on Candles amounted to and the collecting of it cost A:50,000. r l a was a brief history of the tax on Candies— ; N e ar, hear, hear! and land laughter.). ,In our repeal f Jitties, we have assuredly begun at the wrong ca d ; Ave have taken the borthesioif our own shout jrs, and placed it on the shoulders of the poor !—. vi car . Imr, hear!) This has beeu the case in the ro peal of almost all the War Taxes. He earnestly iconvended to the Chancellor of the Exchequer to Terr y the Property Tax. It would be placing the rightly. it would, comparatively speaking, bar :i 7 hrly on the rich, and might in its operations ser ve to relieve the poor. Repeal those taxes that the poor, and you will do a grateful and ac cep bee act to the whole country !—(Hear, hear.)—. If we 3lotton now proposed were carried, Mr. Craw a:er's iron-works must cease, and the lower orders r .nv fully employed there, would be thrown upon the ' Ash. The Lord Mayor, in his Petition for the re ,e.sl of the Coal Duties, had made a very extr.tordi c. try and a very new.discovery—that Coals were one (t the eii , entials of life !—(Hear, and kughter.) But the Lord Ma)or, who was a mighty Potentate in his wn Municipal Empire, besides the wonderful dis covery now mentioned, had very curiously described :ie line of demarcation or boUndary of the Port of Lindon. Mark well!—Whether you come down or Fo li p to the celebrated Port, the duties to tho Lord Navor or to the City of London were the same. You r.a- . .; attempt to reach it by Branford, by the Grand Junction Canal, by Grosvenor.square, -or by any other circuitous route, but you could not avoid the Port Duties of London! Maud laughter and cheering.) But this was not all. The boundary on the West was described by a great stone, near Staines, where the Port of London Duties commenced on the article ct Coals !--(Loud laughter.) Gentlemen might laugh, but it was described by a great stone !--(Continued lou;ker.) What had been the consequence of this strict adherence to the wonderful policy of the Port of London? A cargo of coals were lately expected at Westminster from the West Country. The Lord Mayor had notice of it. In the plenitude of his wis dom, and to take care that the Port of London should not be cheated out of its dues by any sly manoeuvres of the Coal Captain or his Supercargo, he dispatched an Officer—a man of great authority—to the great done, to watch the arrival of this Margo of Coals, and where that very Officer remains to this clayl— (More laughter and cheering.) No such cargo was ever in contemplation, and no. vessel has amved, or is likely to arrive. Instead cf leaving the great stone s-here it now WAS a laughing-stock, he would advise the Lord Mayor to oraler it to be placed on London Bridge, as a mark of his sapience in aquatic geogra phy!—(Hear, hear.) But he was fearful that the Lcrd Mayor and the Member for Surrey had formed* a coalition, which would render the situation of the Inland Counties more desperate!—(Hear, hear.)-- Ile condemned the mode adopted by the Lord Mayor in raising or borrowing money upon what is termed the Orphans Fund. He by. no means spoke with disapprobation of .the Charity. He had for some time thought that the intended measure was asleep, but *tread tb find it revived - by the Honourable Moyer; and he hoped that by a complete negative this evening it would be put to rest for ever!. (Loud cheers.) • Mr. Aldermais•WOOD egplained, that the Lord Mlyor had nothing to do MAlff what was ridiculously ' c.,lled the Great Stone Bossssderryt for it had bees prescribed by Parliament. Lori MILTON opposed the repeal of the Tax, as it now stood ; and contended, that nothing could be more unjust and impolitic than its equalization : the Icy of London proposed to take off the Parliamen tary duty, but intended to keep that which went to their own funds—(Hear, hear.) Such was the pa trintism'of the City of London ! The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER had ready expressed his opinion, when Petitions for the repeal of the Tax had been presented. He should have felt inclined to recommend to the House and to the Honourable Gentleman who had brought the Motion forward, to suffer the subject to sleep, as it vas likely to create much local irritation to no pur pose, for it was evident that circumstances would, not a;low of its being admitted. The finances of the (paltry required to be watched with peculiar care, that no diminution might take place in our resources. This was now no time when taxes could be taken off. It bettame necessary, on the contrary, to see how we could add to the revenue of the country. He then cx:tended, that the Metropolis had been already re ; lived to the f u ll am oun t of the existing duty by the fall which had taken place in the price of Coals. In 18 14, they were 625. a chaldron, and in 1818, only 'tk which afforded relief to the amount of 14s. per thaldron. He objected to the Motion, and thought tae interests of the country would be best promoted by offering the subject to rest. LAMItTON expressed his intention to resist, to ti:e utmost of hisspower, any accession to the taxes. ' 4 ith regard to auy thing like an Inccme Tax, he should never cease to express his abhorrence of such a measure, and he he the Parliament would never irapoc4: so obnoxious a measure on the people. He concluded by saying, that he should give his vote In favour of the Repeal of the Coal Tate. Mr. DICKINSON observed, that London and va rious other placet had their Incalities ; which ought ''!xempt them from burr:newt It *Ould i be st 'Lliwt to lay the tax on t h e pit's 'mouth, and there !are if the tax was to be removed, for Sepal ought to be general. Wl4. SMITH considered the Coal tax as rn injurious to great numbers of people, and that ought to be repealed. tanLittm thoupbe it vould .60 most unfair to take off the tax on coals at.this moment. Alderuxisn,M.6.lTHMAN conceived that most unwaerantahls attack was made on the city of London, through thin motion, 'by an Honourable Gentleman, who said that London wanted to oppress the xest of the country, merely because London wanted to he itself relieved from the tax altogether. Citizens of London were not most affected by this tax ; on the contrary, the other parts of the Me tropolis were much more affected, because there were so many manufactories in its neighbourhood, in which vast quantities of Coals were expended. Sir JOHN dELIHIGHT declared that no man would be more ready to contribute to the expenses of the State than himself, provided they were equally laid on ; but as this tax was partial and unfair, he was averse to it. Mr. MAXWELL said, that it was no grievance on the City of London to be subject to this tax, consi dering the many advantages that City enjoyed. He therefore opposed the motion. Sir MAT CHEW RIDLEY declared, as a reason why the•tax should not be laid on at the pit's mouth, that for some years past, the price of Coals had fallen considerably at the pit's mouth ; and this happened even at a time when the Coals in London were at the, very highest prices. Mr. ELLICE considered the Duties on Coals as most partial and oppressive. Mr. BENNETT considered the tax most unjust, unequal, and oppressive, and therefore he should sup port the motion. Mr. PROTHEROE supported the total Repeal of l the DUtiei. • Mr. Alderman WOOD spoke in explanation c and declared, that in what he had said he did not mean to throw out any insinuation against the City of Bristol. Mr. BYNG considered this as a most oppressive and unequal tax, and he should suppqr the motion. Mr. HART DAVIS spoke en the same side with Mr. PROTHERO4 namely, for the repeal of all the duties. Mr. H. SUMNER spoke in reply. In many parts of Surrey, and particulai-Iy in the town of Farnham, no less thansl4s.were paid for freightage alone upon coals. He was well aware of the great defect in the finances of the country ; but no consideration of that kind would indite him to forego his present motion. The House then divided, when there appeared— For the Motion 49—Against it 151—Majority 102. INSOLVENT DEBTORS ACT. Lord ALTHORPE said, he rose in pursuance of the wishes of the Cornibittee, to move for leave to bring in a Bill, to amend the Insolvent Debtors' Act. He apologized to the House for having brought it forward, before the Report of the Committee was laid on the table ; but it was the wish of the Committee, that before the Bill .came to be discussed, .it should be in the hands of Members, and its merits suffi ciently judged of, before it passed into a law. He wished t'b make the House and the country under stand the principles which this .Bill contemplated.— According to the old law between Debtor and Cre ditor, the individual contracting debts was kept in prison till those debts were paid ; but the grievances produced by this inflexible rigour rendered it neces sary to pass temporary Insolvent Debtors' Acts, which, however, were frequently abused. The Noble' Lord then adverted to the passing of the Insolvent Debtors' Act, properly so called, and went into an exposition of the abuses of it, with regard to persons concealing their property, and otherwise eluding the provisions of the law. To- - ediritteract these abuses,, he should propose that an eiiitiijrZtion should take place out of Court, before it tat& pla c e in Court, and that there should be in the Insolvent Debtors' Court three Commissioner; instead of one. He should,also propose, that the claims of such creditors, as had not proved their debts,within a certain time, should not be taken into consideration ; and that the debtor be obliged to claim the benefit of the Act within four teen days after his arrest, otherwise that he should forfeit it. The nett measure he should propose was, Ole Abolition of Fees in the Court in every instance. The Noble Lord, after some other observations, moved for leave to bring in a Bill for the Relief of the In solvent Debtors an England. Mr. Alderman WAITHMAN observed, that the necessary documents not being before the House, he could.not g o into a general discussion upon it ; yet -he wished it, at the same time, to be understood, that be agreed in the views taken of this subject by the Noble Lord, though it was still probable that he might differ with him in some particulars. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER sup ported the motion, and in the course of his observa tions took occasion to compliment the Noble Lord for the views he had taken of the question. Mr. HURST said a few words to the same effect. Mr. D. W. HARVEY said that the Ministers of the Crown ought to avail themselves of this opportunity to reduce the number of the Commissioners of Bank ropts, which now entailed upon the country an ex pense of £'35,000 a year, whereas three Commis sioners would be sufficient for all the purposes. He merely suggested this, as the Bank) upt Laws ap peared to him to be connected with the subject before the House. • Mr. COURTENAY objected to the introduction of the Bankrupt Question with reference to the present subject; and said that he differed from the Noble , Lord in some of the details of his motion . Ii Sir JOHN NEWPORT hoped that t he benefits of Idle law would be ettended to Ireland. Mr. LESLIE FOSTER said, that the late Steve itsry of State for Ireland had introduced a motion to assimilate the law in both countries, and he doubted , not but the present Secretary would do the same.., Leave was then given to bring in the Bill. Lord ALTHORPE afterwards brought in the Bill, .which was read the first time; to be read the second tine to-morrow fortnight. POOR DETTILEmetrt. • Mr. CRIMPS, in moving for leave to bring in a Bill 'to amend the laws relative to the settlement of di. .poor, explained the nature and tendency of the proo , sent Act. The principal obje ct h e loomed h e MI c hange so much of the law of settlement acrequirestii lasiniitcy of £lO t0.C0.1 He wou ld s perely bring Is s tha Bill now, and leave it for discitasaoc• until Lb. 'next Session. 4 • Mr, S. BOURNE did not expeatlfOlrt-coultiltu nication he bad with the' Honourable Memberi that he would have brought in . the presets 0241. He tiaid it was his intention to bring in a Bill, upon this law, Marly ohlte . nine nature. Ue then stated the nature Doff the Bill he intended to bring in. He proposed to main a clause of the Bill whfcb had been just thrown out—namely, to suspend the order of removal, in case 44 an appeal, until the appeal shall be decided (mar). Mr. CRIPPS was sorry to have misunderstood the night Honourable Gentleman. He would readily yield his intentions.—The motion was then withdrawn. FOREIGN The ATTORNEY GENERAL brought in a Bill ro prevent the enlisting of English subjects in foreign troops, whfch was read the first time, and to be read the second time this day fortnight. BANK REPORT. Mr. GRENFELL observed, that it was by acci dent he did not notice hitherto the omission of.a pa . - per of very great importance in the Appendix of the Bank Report, exhibiting a similar statement to that which had been presented to the House in 1807-- 'namely, a statement of the profits distributed . by the IProprietors of Bank Stock to the present time: Hi have notice he would move that this paper be pa-irked ,this day. . . , . Mr. CALLAGHAN rose, and said he had to beg the attentton of the House a few moments to a pa-, ragraph in one of the Newspapers of the day, with respect to the Bank Repdrt. The paragraph he al luded to appeared in the Courier of this day, arif stated that it was proposed to make the repayment • the Bank advances, amounting to ten millions, be fore the Ist of - February, 1820. If this article were. uthorized, he thought it Was calculated to excite considerable alarm throughout the country ; and, therefore, he would take the liberty to ask his Right Honourable Friend ?--(lnterrupted by cries e No, no, from the Opposition Bexches.)—The question, he thought, to be one of extreme importance, and he was enabled to state, that the Right Hon. Gentleman would have no objection to give every explanation. Sir J. NEWPORT objected to the question, as wholly irregular ; if Newspaper paragraphs were to form the theme of comment in that House, the con sequences would be highly injurious. It was wholly imparliamentary to take up the statements of a news paper, as the subject of any question or discussion, unless such statement was authorised by signature. He protested against the course of the Hon. Member, it never was sanctioned in the House. Mr. GRENFEL rose to give his hearty concurrence to what had been expressed by his Right Hon. Friend, and he was more surprised that the Honourable Gen tleman would have recourse to so unwarrantable an expedient for information, upon a subject which was officially before the House—(Y ear, hear.) He hoped the Honourable Member would therefore see the ne cessity of withdrawing his question. Mr. CALLAGHAN threw himself entirely on the indulgence of the House. lie thought the question hid been a proper one, and if any thing was wanting to confirm him in this opinion, it was, that he had previously a communication with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in which the Right Hop. Gentle man had signified that he would have no objection to the question. The SPEAKER said he was satisfied that on re flection the Honourable Member would be sensible that the question was not wholly unobjectionable. To whatever latitude questions might be broughtlb that House, and however customary it might be fiar Gentlemen to put questions to his Majesty's Minis ters across the table, still this was a matter of cour tesy merely. But this was the first time, he believed., that a Newspaper paragraph was ever made the sub ject of a question in the House '(Hear, heai.) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.-- 4, I am very sorry that my Honourable Friend should ' have been betiayed into this unpleasant situation, in consequence of any communication he may have had with me. • I hope he never will agaiii consider any 'thing that' may appear in that Newspaper as official (Hear.) I have seen much in that Paper of which I entirely disapprove." r ' ILLICIT DISTILLATION ACTS. The House resolved itself into a Committee -0n these Acts. I The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved, that the Chairman be instructed to move for a Bill to limit the operation of the Acts author:zing Still Fines. The principal provisions of the Bill were to empower the Lord Lieutenane to place a body of armed Police in the District where information has been given of the existence of illicit Stills. The pre sent Acts shall not be removed until after the Sum mer Assizes in Ireland. Any County shall have the power to apply to the Lord Lieutenant to continue the Fines, and during the continuance of these fines the County shall be exempted from the new Bill.— The detection of a worm, or Still-head, or any other utensil, save a whole Still, shall not be sufficient to authorize the levying a penalty as upon the discovery of an illicit Still. One half the expenses of the execu tion of the new Bill shall be borne by Government, the other half by - the County, by Grand Jury Assess ments. As to the small Stills, he thought that they required a separate measure. The places, v'llages, and districts, where such stills may be erected, he thought, ought to be enumerated by law, in order not to interfere with "the trade of the large distillers. Sir JOHN NRWPOET dissented from the measure. General HART readily embraced any thing that would save the country from it band,of atrocious and encouraged Eicise Officers, whose progress resembled rather the desolating career of an invading army, than any thing e15e.....„_ Lord Monrcactat.sso Mt. Cuadra/an, Mt. V. W.4=t - JIIIIR ihrittitßioN, Mr. Fawcir, MO Sir N. Coirauser,' suppetted the motion.—The motion being carried, the Hodse resumed. • bir. BROGDEN reported progress, and obtained leave to ,bring in the aforeorld Bill. ..bir. HARVEY Moved for a Return (Attie number of Woe s Mod in the Court of Exchequer for the Recoveity of nil ender the Customs and Excise Laws, from January , #1 n, ; eti Jaziusty, 1819.—Ordered. " The btherOrders of the Day were then disposed of, and the House 'Adjourned at One **Clock. The LittitrysGasetiirday. Next will coa- Cain, among various other articles, Art versus Nature, MW by the Hermit iri London—B, di t. Ancient and Modern Libraries—Sir Charles Morgait's 'Reply to Mr. Renuell, respecting Voltaire and D'Alemberv—Hends'i Account of Jousn'tid Pirates, their Massacres M -- Eden, &c.lnctreifing Corftsponacete of i the Garden o 'reitiO Lon& of Prosata—Snlonte's AdveitureS lea the liesert—Dhiccronri aid 1 4r.eotint of a cosiest, 111tutts4 Pit—The Four POWs*, od America i a Sketch of their Cliaracterb—'.Memoirs of Al Jay, 'Otherwise Radio, tile Afifsso Tniveier—Notices of slit i anew ElthlbMort, the *Pitt •AilMenty, &c. &c.—Original Poetlf--. -... , s.d.ass.....Veristies ioUtivistier, AA, star Meat, eveyy Sasurday, grime& by I 'Mr. Dialogs. Condmtistreet ; and Messrs. uoluia Rut, St. Clement's Church-yard; and is regularly olkliffillVltt Newsmen as.d Station*. &e. AF7PAIRS OF StftEDIV: EXTRACT Or A PRlVA larrix rt MON PICAIMPONT, b hTiIiVAY the su bject hn s c s ingularmjootbeeeisecwnvierhonacuef.rlogaiuivt7inev,dt., Journals, rumours the imagination lus Sweden , adcrhw tollioafich7isersavh: been o a n pi ta Ti og e t c. h e ' ing collected some of ate actual facts, have added some embroidery after their own taste. The Princes of the House of Vasa have never taken any steps towards reclaiming their right to the Crown of Sweden sirfce the Congress of Vienna. When, about a year since, the young Prince Gustavus being of age, his father King Gustavus LV. required of hint whether he acceded to the abdication• which he the King had made of every pretension to the Crown of his ancestors ? the young Prince declared solemnly, " That he did not accede to it, and never would." Gustavus IV. then wrote to the present King of Sweden, Charles John, that, faithful to his'nord, never to attempt the recovery of the Crown which he bad abdicated, he thought himself bound franklyto ' inform him of the refusal of the young Prince to ac' -cede to the abdication. King Charles John replied, that he appreciated as he ought to do this honour ableproceeding on the part of Gustavus IV. but that he;did not feel any necessity of an abdication by the young Prince Gustavus inasmuch as he, Charles John, had been recognized by the States General of the Kingdom, and by all the Powers of Europe. '3Ve are assured that on this occasion, or even pre viously, the present King of Sweden declared to the Emperor of Russia and the English Government, 'that " not having had any ambition to obtain the Crown of Sweden, and having accepted it merely on the instance of the Four Orders of the Realm, he was ready to make a sacrifiCent it to the interests of the nation, if ever the States General of Sweden and the Diet of -Norway expressed their wishes to that effect, and freed him from the oaths that bind him to the two Kingdoms." On the cession of Norway to Sweden, this latter Power engaged, by the treaty of Kiel, to undertake a certain portion of the . debts of Denmark. The amount of these debts appeared eventually to be greater than was at first understood, and Sweden has resisted payment on the ground that Denmark has not exactly fulfilled the conditions of the Treaty, and. that the Norwegians, in resisting the union of Nor way with Sweden, have caused her to contract ex traordinary expenses. Denmark replied, t'hdt ftttf rendering her right, she fulfilled her part of the Treaty, and that she was not bound by the acts of - the Norwegians. Such was the question which was submitted to the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle. The provisional deci sion of the Sovereigns was favourable to Denmark, and the Court of Russia was especially chargechspithi pressing the conclusion Of this affair. 1 if The Emperor Alexander, anxious to !Asleep thp promise which he formally gave to Denmark in 1007, to compensate her for her losses in •consequence her attachment to Russia, appears to hake displiefed t • in the negociationc now pending, It very lively setillbe ye the interests of Denmark. These negociations already began to occupy the attention of the political world, when circumstances which are altogether foreign to this affair gave occa sion to very hazardous conjectures. The young Pt ir ce ' Gustavus was seen to receive marks of favour from his uncle, the Emperor of Russia, and to prepare ior a journey to England.. Prince Christian, the presump tive heir to the Ca-awn of Sweden, was seen, p4 ;l 3 lni c :li his tour in Germany, to unite himself in friendship with the family of Vasa. 4 Princess of this - House was seen to unite he with the presumptive heir of the Grand Duchy'bf • Baden. On the other' side ( rumours were heard of alliances proposed and refused, and reports the most extraordinary were circulated; among others, that Sweden, not being able to support the weight of the debts of Norway, would consent to cede Norway to the young Grand Dukcof Oldenburg, son of .the late Queen of Wertemkurg, sister of the Emperor Alexander. The advantage of a better equilibrium in the North would recompense Denmark for het pe cuniary pretensions; but the establishment of a branch of the House of Holstein. Oldenburg in Nor way would naturally lead to the re-establishment of the House of Holstein Vasa in Sweden, and one might easily imagine , the formation of a family com pact in the North, which would procure for Russia an immense developement of her marine, and would give to Denmark and Sweden the advantage of her protection and the assurance of peace. The article, after some further observations, con cludes by asserting the falsity of the several rumours in circulation respecting a proposal said to have been made to Charles John to abdicate his Throne. A letter from Frankfort, dated May the Bth. says, 0 The most impenetrable veil continues to cover the negociat'afts which, it is asserted, are carrying on between Russia and the present Government a Sweden. Conjectures ire multiplied all , iafusitrwr. It is mid, that the Cabinet of Stockb In has askejt the mediaticn or irtervention of England; and a report Cats been &caved, that Danish Agents had been :wrested on the frontiers of Norway." A Letter from Cadiz, dated April 19, says—" Many of the transports, ,hartertd in England, are arriVed in the roads of Cadiz ; bat it is sow perceivable, that the fidelity of the seamen wh6 man these vessels is not at all to be depended upon. As Englishmen, they entertain notions wh:eb are widely opposed to the meets of the expeditiou, nay; many of them have cimultted printed proclamations in favour of the cause of indepenneact. The iffeades oli Iletrrio have AtCovered many of these :it'd!' s .s; and they see clearly, that no gond will result learn. the atrial of these foreigners. These observations apply equally to the trench seamen on board the transports arrivdd froM Bourdeittx and Bayonne; all of sheet openly profess a spirit of independence wl l:h . ' cannot be tolerated in a country that groans under an arbitarq.ck pedant hie likewise &Birthed, that die expedition will not i s l fore the south of Ikeemfor ; and the troops, which had been Seta on board siverafshiPs, have been disembarked since my las: let ter. The news from Mexico is said to be of a favourable tiaiiite, hat the Spanish Qovernment has not thought proper to puttlish :t. Many of the corps of insurgents have retreated towards the Eastern Pt ovineta ; but this beam iful portion of the lfeAt is far from beiog tranquillised Don Manuel Canzada;ieetred of holding Mmonical Meetings at his house, has been arre:4,4.l, and all his hooka and papers seized by the Agents of the Idly Cate. Nadi' vela had soot ridbruloss than such a persera. don; it is of no utility whatever.; the more the _Freemalons are aiitmeolet, at t re'prdselyies do they Make. Tyro Meteor the ktedsoesieliof rut lite been &dared or& foteeride. They are &haat allecaten and uaserviceable, The San Juan Baptista Bar heetrtikte' h 9 i Ottetteet untlet tIV nig of Ah l / 4 11, at sfly miles off Cape S:. Vincent, and in sight of a Spaniik whoop/to The late *frivol., from liavannalt Itave bees ratiscr favourable t 6 thir eel/tartlet of Coat; fru t e Metca gar ti fun of In surgent privateers." • T f 1 1 1 1 • I I I l I I ' I _ • • 4 1111 2 1 1 I I 1 ' 1 it : I I, . _ -7,.