Star. — London, England, 1819-06-29 00:00:00

nffli N t r BE it 1%1 CEA ER, IL MST-OFFICE, tad Jinte,lsl9. THE Lords Commissioners of his Majest,y's Trea sut7 having directed that Persons should tre,invleed aelivcr in Plans and EICVAtIOIII for the propoied trectibb of Sew Post-018er ; Notice is hereby given, That such Hans Fleoarions will be received by the Postmaster-General, , Ogee in Lombard-meet ; and such Architects (orming and delivering Designs •for the have access to the Calularioas and Hans Three Hundred Pounds Wilf be given best Plan and g lc:I:Anon which shall be fur iscoud best ; and £lOO for the third heir:. delivered in on or before the Ist September)... By Command of the Postmaster-General, FRANCIS FILMLING, P If .----- AA -.— U7ECCHAI 4 GR ASSURANCE _ Istabikbed by Royal Charter In the /Win hf King George Jusi l / 4 1819. I)ERSONS whose ANNUAL. PREMIUMS fall due on the 24th instant, are hereby informeil. that RE CEIPTS are sew midi s° be delivered at the Company's Offices over the ROYAL EXCHANGE and in PALL—MALL, as well as by their respective Apbnta in the several COunties ; and the Parties assured we requested to apriy fdr the lleueNvel of their Poke' Amen or before the eth of Site scut, as, the weak Fifteen Days Aimed for Payment, beyond the date of each Ph.e key, will then expire. SAMUEL PF—NNINGohn. See, Kr Attendance is given daily it the said Offices foe the Aug. ranee of Buildings, Goods, Merchandises, and Ships in harbour; la dock, or while building, from Loss or Damage by Fire ; and also for the Assurance of and Granting Annuities on Lives. N.B. Fire Policies will be issued tree of expense to the As. ord. , where the Annual Premium amounts to 6s. or upwards. . . TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, . By Mr. WAKEFIELD, At Conaway 's, on TOZSDAY, the 13tft of July, at 12 o'clock, ,f HE celebrated Estate of PIERCEFIELD, near Chepstow, in Monmouthshire • the Property consists ate m ate Mansion, standing hi a Park of 571 Acres, boendedon emit side by a Stone Wail, on the other by the River Wye. The whole Estate comprises TWO THOUSAND SIX HUM DEED AND SEVENTY-FOUR ACRES of Land, 'ex mating on bath eke beats of the Wye, from close to niters Abbey, to the Town of Chepstow, apd is of the manual valise ist THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY POUNDS. In picturesque scenery this spot has been long celebrated as the first in Great Britain, Nature having lavished her favours upon it with a most bountiful hand, and xendered it the boast and pride of all lovers of fine 'scenery. be minute value• is great, from its contiguity to Chepstow and the ,Severn, which carries its produce to the best markets. particulars may be had of Messrs. White and Woodrofic Solicitors, Lincoln's-Inn ;of Messrs. LY111404, Solicitors, Bristol; Mr. Cooke, Solicitor, Rosa; of Messrs. Watt, Solicitors, Bath ; and at Mr. Wakefield's, Land Agent and Surveyor, No. 49, Pill- Mail, of whom Matta may be had to View it. THE ADVOWSON OF ThIE VERY VALUMILLE RECTORY OF LONG MELFORD, IN SUFFOLK. ' By Mr. PHILLIPS, On FRIDAY, the 83d day of July, 1819, at the Auction Mart, opposite the Bank of England, at Twelve at Noon Parish contains about 60(X) Acres oiT HE Trich Land. Tho Small Tithes of the whole Varish are due to the Rectory, and, with the exception of about 2000 Acres, the Great Tithes also. This Glebe consists of upwards of 130 Acres,, half of which is in a Ring-feices and contiguous to the Par arageoHouse, which is calculated for the accommodation of a bege family, and has excellent Gardens, Coach-House, and other Bididlogs attached to it. There; le atm a Mane; well aseleedirtith Game. The present Incumbent lc 79. •-• Medford is on the turnpike-road (pin Bury St. Edmund's to London, 60 miles distant front the latter, and 12 miles South of the former. Printed Particulars may be bad of Mr. Phillips, the Anc. doneer.73, New Bond-street, London ; and of Mr. Wm. Dalton, Solicitor. Any at. Edmund's. The Parsonage House and Premises may be viewed by appli cation to Mr. Dalton. WHEREAS my Wife, ANN COREY, late of Assembly-row, in the County of Middlesex, baying in the month of April, 1818, left my house withuut my consent, or any jut cause, I hereby repeat the Notice which I publicly gave in t►e staid mouth of April, that I will not be an swerable for any Debts my said wife may contract; and that property to a considerable amount was, on my marriage, settled on her for her separate use, the interest of which she regularly receives every half year, fnim the Bank of England, and which interest is amply sußdent to support her, in a manner suitable to her situation i i life : and I repeat the Caution I before gave, to all persons whomsoever, not to harbour her or trust her on my credit.—Witness my band this twenty-sixth day of June, 1819. Witness, Jas. ilawsm. • THOMAS COREY. MEETING AT THE CROWN AND ANCHOR. A Meeting of a very instructive nature was held yesterday at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, Mr. lIENuy HUNT in the Chair. _ _ It was called on the requisition of three persons, each of whom signed for himself and twenty others ; and the object of it was to obtain from the Commit tee appointed to administer the Fonds subscribed for the Sufferers under the late Suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act an account of what they had done with the money. About 200 persons were present. Anitmg the party of Requisitionists who stationed themselves on the right of the Chair were Dr. WATSON, Mr. GALE JoNsts, Mr. MOGORIDGE (Printer), Mr. HoLL, Mr. Casa, &c. The Committee were represented, on the opposite side, by MERIT& WOOLIR, CLEARY, GALLO wAT, BROOKS, Bowls, &c. The CHAIRMAN (Mr. HUNT) having read the Re quisition and the 'purpose of it, asked the Members of the Committee if they had any communication to make to the Meeting? Mr. CULIRY thereupon read what purported to be a Report from the Committee, in which, while they disowned being responsible for their intromissions to any other than a meeting of the Subscribers by whom they were origiu4y nominated, they consented to infprm the Meeting, that the total suer collected amounted to upwards of £1,400, and that the whole of it had been tlispribd among persons sufferers tinder the Seapeasoo of the Habeas Corpus Act, except 4 tialance of about 00, which remained in hand. The Committee begged further to protest, that they would not be liable foi any of the expenses of the preseat Meeting, Mr, lio4L, on the part of the Requisitionists, then moved, that a series of letters which had appeared in a weekly journal, addressed y himself, Carr, Moggridge, and one Brettel, totheCommiuee ! should be read, as explanatory of the reasons for calling the present Meeting. The letters alluded to were ac cordingly read, and were found to complain in bitter terms of gross partiality basis( been shewn by the Committee in the distribadas of the funds en six weeks luently upon them, ...cen voted more than £lO each. The Committee, it was presumed, had been deceived by the Evanses into a belief that they were of a. su perior, character to any of the other sufferers un de r 'the Suspension, and that in particular they haeliad nothing to do with the disgraceful riots at Spa-fields, founding on a Certificate signetlh/ Watson, Thistle. Wood, Preston, and Hooper. in w ich these persons declared such to be the fact. But will the Evanses; it was asked, deny that this paper was signed at their earnest solicitation.-..that it was merely intended as a blind to save them from being involved in the fate of /heir associates? Will they say that their Spencean Society did not, both collectively and individually,. give its support to the Spa-fields Meeting ? they deny that a large posting bill, announcing the Meeting, was not hung up in the Society's Room a few days previous ? Will Mr. Evans, sen. deny that he did not exhort the persons then present as in duty bound to attend the Meeting ? &c. A letter from the same parties to Sir FRANCIS BUR nitrr, with the Baronet's answer, was also read. The answer of Sir Famicis stated, that he had never had any participation in the proceedings of ihe Commit tee, and that he would willingly do what .kte could to bring them to account for any, misconduct of which they had been guilty, but that he did not well, see how the thing was to be effected. A paper was then handed up to the Chairman, which .he stated to be a letter addressed to him, by Parr,. Hall, and Moggridge, containing a farther ex planation of their reasons for the part they had taken s calling the Committee to an account, and which, with the permission of the meeting, he would read. The letter, which was accordingly read, was long and rather extraneous. It narrated all the bait breadth escapes which the writers had had in.effect lag young Watson's concealment, respecting which it made some curious enough revelations; and then urged how superior their claims on the friends of ppblic liberty were to those of the Messrs. Evans, litho had nevertheless been. so much more liberally rewarded. The reading of the documents having been finished. GALII Jones rose, and after inveighing in warm *ems against the Committee for. the partiality and dilatoriness of their conduct, in the course of which the lie direct was very freely bandied between the speaker and several of the Members of the Commit tee, he concluded with moving a Resolution expres sive of the censure of the Meeting. The Resolution was seconded by a Mr. GAss. A person, we believe of the name of WEDDRR awIs, then addressed the Meeting. He announced himself as of Negro extraction—a native of the island of Jamaica. He was sorry to see the friends of liberty thus quarreling between themselves ; and wished, for the sake of toe cause, that he could bring them to make matters up. The Committee o*lght not, he thought, to be censured' for dividing the loaves and fishes so unequally, since they_had only done on a small scale, what the Nation did on a large one. If the subscribers had expected equality 'of distribution, they should have appointed a Commit tee of West Indian Negroes, who, being equally fed and equally worked, would have known what it was to divide equally. lie continued for some time in the same strain, affording considerable amusement to the Meeting, but at length getting extraneous and extravagant, he was hooted down. Mr. Women was then loudly called for. He did not attempt to defend the Committee either from the charge of unequal distribution or improper delay. The grant to the Evanses he thought out of all pro portion to the 'amount of the subscription, and a statement of the funds ought, he conceived, to have Been long before now submitted to the Public.— He did not bon ever see that since the distribution of the funds had been entrusted to the discretion of the Committee, they could now be quarreled with foi having exercised that discretion. The Meeting might pass what resolution of censure they pleased, but it could not be a resolution of any avail. . Mr. JONES replied, and the Resolution was then put and carried, with resolutions ofthanks to the Chai rman, and the parties who had called the Meeting. MADAME DE GEN LIS' NEW Wonx.—The translation of " Les Parvenus," (the Upstarts), has at length ap peared under the more appropriate title of The Netp Ara. It will be found replete with interest to the English reader, particularly for the faithful picture it draws of the horrors of the French Revolution Ma dame de Geniis puts the following words in the mouth of her hero, Julien &dolour, who is the hiStoriairof his own singular adventures : " Every Frenchman who b aseked the lip at aaM If, and was present at the opal et Ile liemersim* happened to be in Maw wises irosarkraloserforeed to tabs a part, so that whoever knew bow to who widiVillarable cora rectness, WO; If pie'? "irk did list Noir Ma MIA vim' tive, or •••tee, Oster ikenir edit Ike bepe et prink*" some intereetkelleaseke at the moil& Sow, k sadden is my bting enereiselyketike, is to all that poses amend me, many hp - racy P YN, after a few prefatory .. ,—oeree on the Scots Burghs' lid Bill, which ac 14001noted through a Committee of the whole House, and T Chattel& Foundarlone Bill was read :d eoreuntteod for Thuradai. Lind 110/ O LAND presented a Petition ;Aube the Foreign Enlistment The Amerken Trade Bill passed through . 1 0 0. b 1 114/ *tale all was 70REIGN ENLISTMENT The Order of the Day, upon which ships were summoned, which was for going into Committee on this Bill, being read, Earl BATHURST rose, and stated the grounds upon which the measure was submitted for the ap probation of their Lordships. The Noble Secretary of State entered primarily into a *eneral view of the Law applicable to the offence which the Bill was framed more effectually to prohibit, as is stood be- h fore-the 9th of George the Second, and which sys tem of laws went generakly to render the offence of enlisting in foreign service a felony without benefit of Clergy. It appeared, however, that these laWs were frequently found liable to evasion. The Acts of the 9th and 19th of Geo. IL were calculated to amend that part ' f the Code, but which had not been 'done, as erroneously supposed, principally with re ference to the projects of the Pretender. His Lord ship then proceeded to state the causes which gave rise to the recently proposed alteration in the law. It was understood that many British Officers had left the country with a view of entering into the service of die Spanish Insurgents, in South Amei ica ; and an opinion was circulated, that such had been the wish' of his Majesty's Government. It was then thought proper to mark its sense to the contrary ; and a letter was circulated in that view by the Secretary at War, which particularly applied to the consequences Offi cers on half-pay were to expect from such a conduct. This procedure had not the desired effect. • The re cruiting went on, and Officers were appointed in re giments destined for the service of the Spanish Insur gents. Doubts were entertained as to the e.:ilting statutes being applicable to the particular case—that of the Spanish Insurgents not being coLsidered as re gularly coming under their purview, and it became necessary to recur to Parliament on the occasion.— It being determined to remain strictly neuter, a Pro clamation was issued in 1817, cautioning his Maje - ty's subjects not to accept commissions, or to enlist in the service of those persons; and those British sub je:ts already in his Spanish Majesty's service, were cautioned against serving in South America. All drese steps, and an offer of mediation being found un availing, a direct reference to Parliament became ne cessary, for further or more clearly defined powers, and the measure now before their Lordships was sub -mined. The Bill went to repeal the former Acts, ,and also to abrogate the Irish Statute on the subject. It prqvides, that if any British subject should a c cept any commission without license from his Majesty, or enlist in the service of any foreign power, sir of any power assuming any foreign authority, such persons so offending, shalt, upon conviction, be deemed gpilty, not of felony without benefit of clergy, as in te former Acts, 1)1;5 of a misdemeanor. There were other provisions, to which the relevent Acts of George H. did not apply, included in the Bill. The Noble Earl shewed, he was willing to argue the me ritS of the present measure on the ground of general policy, not with reference to any relative situation which Spain may stand in with respect to this coup try, but as a permanent Act, and defencible on the principles of general policy. Glancing at the situa tion in which the Spanish Government stood.with re spect to a large portion of its subjects in a state of insurrection and revolt, his Lordship adverted to the conduct of the person assuming the tide of Sir Gre gor Macgregor, of which he spoke in terms of cen sure and condemnation, and as affording a dangerous example to individuals inclined to proceed to where ever the love of plunder may induce them to go ; and these hostilities, a great part of which were corn mined under the British flag, were committed in did possessiops of a power with whom we sere at amity and peace. He would ask any of their Lordships,. was it consistent with common sense, or common he nesty, that these things should be overlooked, with. out their (his Majesty's Government) coming to Par liament for adequate powers of interference or pre- . sten:ion ?—(Hear, hear.)—ln illustrating the justice and policy of the line of conduct now adopted by the British Government, the Noble Secretary referred to what had been the policy or the steps taken, not only. by "the British Government, belly other powers, par ticularly the United States of America, on occasions more or less similar to that in question. He thought, without referring to the ponderous folios of German Jurists on the subject, the plain duty of a power de termined to remain neutral, was sufficiently clear and incontrovertible to need. illustration. Upon that principle they acted in the present case, and upon these plain principles of policy which the case suffi ciently indicated. In this part of his argument the Earl entered largely ugo historical reference detail, .particularly sripectisyg the occurrences h took place in the reigns of James and Charles First, on the occasions of the Continental trans• gts its which those Monarchs were implicated, glen* at the relative situations in which country and her Atnerican Colonies were placed by o. the Bill.--On the question, Lord HOLLAND expressed strong doubts as to ' moti , • the Noble Earl being the real, Government were ac and he could not anomaly in the existing ' object. A great was avowedly de expected to hear laid down by the America; and as little r did he expect to hear it in effect advanced, that until the year 1736 this country had neglected all those principles of neutrality which were so much in; sisted upon. It was unfortunate, however, for the argument, that in those periods, when the German Jurists were chiefly consulted, the relations of peace and amity were much longer preserved that' in pre, ceding times ; he then adverted to a considerable portion of the historical references brought forward by the Noble Earl (Bathurst), from which, however, he must draw very different conclusions, and observe, that the extreme love of peace manifested by James ,the First, was much more advantageous to the conn try than a propensity to warfare po.ibly could be.— The existing law, he thought, was fully sufficient to maintain the country in a state of neutrality without the aid of such a Bill as the present. Even recent events plainly shewed this. He instanced the case occurring in 1791,* when a number of English Of& cers and otters entered into the - service of the inha bitants of the Netherlands, who found themselves obliged to resist the coercive measures adopted by the Emperor Leopold ; for these transactions he quoted the Annual Register of that year, a work then conducted by a Gentleman of whose talents and erudition the Noble Lord spoke in terms of great eulogy, namely, the late Dr. Laurence. The prin; ciple on which the Noble Earl contended the Bill was founded, viz. that cf neutrality, was Carried by the Noble Lord, he thought, top far, and in a way that every country in Europe may call upon this to pass Acts of the kind; whenever they should think themselves likely to be affected. Such a measure, however, may be expected to flow from that Am r-phytrionic Council, the emigres' lately held ess the Continent: it was of a similar nature with that mea; sure which he thought made such inroads upon the Constitution of this Country; he meant the Alien Act. Before such a measure was acceded to, it should becoosidered what real good that Power had rendered this country for whom we were now called upon to make such sacrifices. Ile then glanced at some points in the conduct of Ferdinand VII. which in his mind entitled that Monarch to very little fa your or preference from this Country, and particu larly the great partiality which was shewn to France Over Great Britain in the duties imposed upOn the important article of cloth. What was said respect ing the Officers on half-pay he disapproved, and he must deprecate such a line of policy, as that of which the Bill formed a part, more particularly when the country was in such a state of commercial distress, and such immense numbers of the poor were out of employ ; and it should be recollected that one immediate effect of such a discontinuance to assist the South American Insurgents must be, to dete riorate or-counteract the sale of British manufactures in that Continent. In concluding, he observed that, ,at best, it appeared to him, the subject was entirely misunderstood, in the measure being regarded as a matter of duty, arising out of a principle of neu trality, instead of considering it as a question of mere expediency. The Earl of WESTMORELAND thought that in considering this question, we had nothing to do with the conduct of the King of Spain. If the King of Spain had been guilty of acts of aggression to wards us, he ti listed th ere was still power in this country to revenge and to punish injuries. But he also trusted this country had too much honour to turn aside from an avowal of its feelings for such in juries, and endeavour to be revenged by a breach of neutrality, and a secret departure from mutual Trea ties.. The Noble Lord contended, that on the sub ject of interest and commerce, the measure now pro posed was desirable, since the army of the English being in South Arne: iea, was, in fact, destructive of our commerce with the Spanish Colonies; instead of adding to it. By the law as it now stood, it was felony to serve the King of Spain, yet by the com mon law you could not proceed against the offender till he was beyond the power of the law. This, he contended, was a state .of law which ought not to exist. He was ready to acknowledge with the Noble Lord (Holland) that the King of Spain Fad no right to call on this country to aitev its laws; but the King of Spain had a right to call on us, we having entered into a Treaty with him, to keep that Treaty. He would ask—supposing the tubjects of the' King of itrlin were found engaging in the Foreign Slave rade, contrail , to the Treaty between the two coins. 'Os, and we were, on remonstrating with him, to be -told by him, " my laws will not enable me to pre. rent my subjects carrying on this trade;" what would 'be our answer ? Why, should we not - say, 6' We kfriw nothing of your laws; that is a question be. lop your subjects and yourself: but we expect and . sind that you should fulfil the Treaty exiling between us." Similar language might be adopted. • ....: • . , ..- -.. : • - ','" •-*: . r'•'• ~7'" -.7: - .7..tit :.-• ' • ItP 0. • 6 . • ..t• • .' t s • • •• • * •!.. '.,' s.. .• " ! . a i - 1 * - ' • „ . , • . ' .. . . - . .. • . • ...., . . .• • .• • , .., . ... . - , ... • . - • .... . .%, . • - . .....7- .A,,... ~....... 114i,,,4,. • - •, . ... , . . .-... . • - ... II i ' • - - 10 * 1 s lel •. • •• , • . ... . ~ .. .. . . • • ' . ;.) r ...., .1 , .. , . . _s- .. .s., , ~ ' .#11.:-liat.riti -.. • ...-:.- • - -' +.l r• . - - *,; , ,„, II . 7 . o r'' Ill ry j . S . . , IP:•• • •i 4% l ' ,• ... i ii.‘• • 'l, r% •'. ''' ./7 . ,! :...,, 4404' t - kit lt.r.; !,494. , ,10. •-- - ii. 4 -. . A - •••• \A i 1 . - llil -- - 1..* , - - I .• - -- - P,A...P4- 4 4 1, • .1. - ipk, . i . ~ .. .. : ,'. . -..,-,4•,...•!* - . \ 1 - 111 ‘ e . . . • . .• • 4'...sep oer: - ~. , - N.., • 0 \ 4 , i . • 1 Atr t 6 • • • • . • • -. • ' It. • . —..u-.m...01 • . ....,...._ - . , it..m0m0mm0t0...1.1mA...1...r...... . . .. ' . .. . . • .. TUESDAY, JUNE iii; 1810; '. • :1 . i% ' , . - ' r itiCE SEVEN -PENC T. • • . . i • .... 7..."..."." 17 .... --... ' , . . . . PFICE, truste‘t to them, and of the great deli y which had ,FAn EU : ME ArI'ARY PROCEA#RING S. at the period of the Memorable contest between them, his 3,2ida;recyrsisll9. Tres - taken place in winding up the - subsCription. The . ind noticed the'eientual conduct of the then French writers of the letters particularly complained that As shoukl .bu,barlfed to HOUSE OF LORDS, JUNE 28. • Government on that ocesvion. Arguing from these propoied Erectilsh otthe the Evanses, father and son, had beeir awarded out Onunael were fulatly beard respecting the Scots Cause," Grant • en, That such flans and of the money sulrscribed no less than £3OO, while .0. cunninithaeo—Jedzinent powporied: n throughout, the superior policy, in such a case' as the ttnaster-General, at their, others, Who had acted quite as patriotically, suffered Viscount Thititi N G TON' roamed the notice of his .nte - irchitects as are desirous a great deal more, and would have dared what th tire s eon so goose cheebird rea di n g of, ch as e s R e li e f Bin On w e d_ present, under the crrcumstances of the country, re. , the above purpose, may . to now in this Grace. durst had ' ' not,been put off with wretched pittances ueidsYsanfl moved that the Lords be summoned for that day, !Raining Strictly . ' neutral. In furtherance of these 'which was ordered aerbrdingly. • • . en as a Frendrim f o r t h e of £5 and £lo—as for instance, . Carr, Moggridge , Duss's DivjrcelliEwas, on the motion of the Earl of Lax- vrinciples mut this object, the measure before their. Lordships was founded, which, as one cults most sa- furnisir.4l—XSOo for the and another, who had been the means of saying young - nes&ott read the third time„abd passed. !" 11 - The ga"t° bu Watson from the fangs of his pursueri,'and secreting - lutary effects, in various points of view, would ran-. ober next A kt u nelies toi L iw Pril in eetion tie l / 4 Ad s L se , n t 8 1 s e e n ßan . m k iu ld i v io. aze ; li t, ;aster-General, Win for months before he effected his escape to Ante-. Laws' ndmeut , t der the Government duly responsible, and which, he chneut, and one or two Other little, were br ought 'Must contend, was strictly founded in justice, as wet! Itzsyy h vG, & vo t ary . - rica, and who, for all their exemplary fidelity,as in the true principles of sound policy. The Noble and up d avm the Cormons by try C. W. Wrests, Mr. Baousszt: , Ititsql2- 0/TILL, • six weeks confinement, wl.icrl it eubsequently brought ' a . m il t th " M ''' '. of It be OBLYN. after ftr a si few ti Tefatory Secretary concluded by moving the conunitrnen t of trigs b ( Rir g Geor Ee L upon them, had been voted no more than £ lO each.• oh ations, moved tim.Cotonrinee en the a,cit. Burrhs' Jail Bill. which ac- the Bill.-On the question, " rn ' a i n7l . tivegiT — en - m";;lVeredit - efl yids sups- clentlY it racy and minuteness. Born h the, I therarbieshad Noble Es for my origin, nor have I ever cuswahnd gliaant and dos Nobles and Courtiers, which is so ohm tt a i ! I erwr o = which to while it lowardly betrays sylelt et maryesig seen v i ces , virtues, and m ai i n emir m k s bopeanget . the First reflected On die loam% miles* wod woodbuldmi actions i, /peek, fakbfolly deseelblig *UM* I sew meet He then end rain /reed an use iidlerbririalditY t hi s emu or suggernico b tie redtal, read the second time, the motives avowed by the Noble E ones by 'which hit Majesty's Gove; ion from Liverpool tnated on the present occasion, al thiuk the desire to correct an anonn gh a Committee, and 14w could be deemed an adequate ;read the sa cowl date. fart of the' Nektaarri Tie iCe BILL. rd Frog sources which e little vhich their Load- referred to, namely, the principles for going into a conduct of the United States of -0! fr,