Star. — London, England, 1816-11-28 00:00:00

ward. the was although ... was iudgment upon Pe' - . . • ... 1 ' whici ‘ LAW IN r ELLIG ENCE. •"` - 1 . sp i ll i.,;--. ----, . state( . . COURT OF CHANCERY; NOVEMBER nr. • • i ng ? H S EARL or HARROWS? V . LORD FORTESCUIO had 1 Sir &lam lt , aatt.t.v said, that the plaintiff, the in co Earl of Harro wb y . as p ossessor of an appropria te the ci Recto, was entitled to a mode: of the defendant, mot Rector, • Lord Fortescue, vilsa refased to pay it, alleging as a in tle reason, that the plaintiff was only entitled to a corn- mom reason, position The object of the Bill was to have his, plain Lot dship's directions how to promatfor the recovery 1 , horse Of the madur. The Rectory was in lay hands, and was rhe a 1 t'' not an Ecclesiastical Rectory. unab Mr. HALL followed on the same side. had Mr. PARSONS read the defendant's answer to the hors( e plaintiff's Bill; when wilt. His LORDSHIP observed that it contained no proofs, no , and therefore could be of no service. • being THE MARQUIS OF HEADVORT AND ANOTHER V. BENTLEY ed it AND OTHERS. SOW 1 Mr. AGAR for the plaintiffs, the Marquis of Head- mao fort and the Earl of Bective, who were parties .to a p lait i deed of trust, of which t he defendants were trustees, pact applied for an injunction to restrain the defendants mon from further proceedings under the deed, and for an them account of monies received by them; and re q uested, cold that his Lordship would order it to be•sent to the corn Master for him to see what was expedient to be done 66 under the said deed. , - tice His LORDSHIP ordered it to be sent to the Master. . sup; /MINIM V. WAINWRIGHT. Tor This was a Bill filed against the defendant for a N breach of trust, in selling an estate on which he had in i a lien, without giving the plaintiff, who was entitled ou . to the estate - subject to the li e n , an o pp ortunity of th e discharging Cie incumbrance. the His Loansine said, he would give his opinion thereon tit-morrow. Hil deb His Loansate intimated to the Gentlemen of the' en i i Bar, that Tues Jay and Wednesday next were the ed, days on which he intended to give judgment, at Lin- atan coln's Inn Hall. Hil COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER V. affi NOTICE TO THE PROFESSION. The Court gave notice that they w ould sit at Ser. tha jeant's Lin Hall on Thursday, the 16th of January, that 1817, for the purpose of disposing o f the remaining the new trials moved for in last Term. it PRISONERS IN THE KING'S BENCH PRISON. da, The Court pronounced two orders, amending for- .„,, mer orders ; first, with respect to pri soners detained in the King's Bench prison. by wh ich it is re q uired ass fir, fir in future, that if any pi ironer in c ustod y of the Mar. hu ' 1 shal, who shall be entitled to be dischar g ed b y su p er- de terfras, but is detained by 4 writ or writs of error, the „ plaintiff in such cases shall with all con venient speed -I of i' give notice in writing to the Marshal of such writ or h writs of error having been sued out; and in case of h i s default herein, the Frisoner obt ainin g a rupee/ deal d i shall be forthwith discharged, unless spec ial reasons are given to the Court to the contrary. The second wt s . O orda was fur continuing a former order made iu the reign ot 'George 11. for regulati n g the fees payable Is° t by prisoners in the King's Bench, in respect of chain- i lb bee-rooms and apartments in the prison. SI . THE MING V. HUTCHINSON. , hi Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN prayed the judgment o f SI the Court against this defendan t, who was convicted re at the last Assizes for the County of Lincoln, before • Mr. Baron Graham, of an assault upon an old man a ' ' aged 73, named lardy Measure. The case appeared to be this :—The defendant, who had been employed cbe! in the office of surveyor Of the highways. had con- b ceived a notion that the prosecutor had spoken preju- . E diciall, of his conduct in the office of surve y or, b y u in.iitiating that he had defrauded the parish in • charging I Us. per diem for the use of a cart with one horse and a nian, in repairing the roads within his 4 district ; and under this impression, he attacked the , a ! prosecutor on a market day in the town of Spalding, A and after abusing him in the most opprobrious terms, '' he threw a halter over his head, which remained II I for WNW time suspended on his hat, in the presence 1 .tupwards - of 400 persons assembled on the occasion. ; This was the assault of which the defendant was t found gdilty. F Affidavits were now put in on the part of the lat. I . ter, who defended his conduct , by insistin g th at the prosecutor had frequently asserted to several different ; persons, that he had acted fraudulently and disho- nestly in his office of Overseer of the Highways—an 1 assertion which was totally without foundation. He deposed, that he had merely thrown the halter in 1 question at the prosecutor in the irritation of the l . moment ; and that he had never struck, wounded, nor used any other violence towards him. The statement respecting the halter was contra. - , dieted in an affidavit put in by the prosecutor. Mr. &leant Colmar and Mr. READER were beard 1 in mitigation ; and Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN and Mr. DENMAN in aggravation. The COURT sentenced the Defendant to pay a fine of MO to the Xing, end.to remain in the custody of the Marshal until die fine be paid. THE KING V. WILLIAM RICHARDSON'. The Defendant was convicted at the Summer Assizes for - Newcastle, in the year 1813, before Mr. Justice Cnietssas, of a misdemeanor, for compound- ing a penal action under the Stamp Laws ; since which time he had remained in custody, being a period of near three years, without ever being brought up for judgment, the prosecutor, Edward Dodd, having died long since. Mr. RICHARDSON now moved to make a rule abso- lute for praying the judgment of the Court, in the abbence of the defendant, on the ground that he was too poor to pay the expcnse of coming up from New- castle to London. The COURT, having beard the Learned Judge's report of the trial, sentenced the defendant to three smooths' further imprisonment in Newcastle Gaol. SHARMAN V. BEVAN. The ATTORNIT•GENERAL and Mr. SCARLET? SheW. • ed cause against a rule obtained by Mr.' Gurney, a few days once, for setting asii-: the award of a Gen- declaim at the Bar in this rather intricate case. The action\ in which. the m otion arose, was a g ainst the Sheriff of Surrey , for a false return to a writ of feri pin, to which the defendant returned realla boa.— When the ease• came for trial, it was referred to ar- bitration, and the arbitrator having made his award. the present motion was made to set it aside, on the i ground of a 'mistake ht the law of the case submitted to him, inasmuch as be ruled that the action was mat able against the Sheriff, although there was se i 'no nce of considetatioa for the judgment upon ..... • 41. thkilteeilatissile4e elnue • ,111 - rlule; upon very long affidavits, ,stated, that parsons Isamed/slestander and Fox, tea proprietors of a Bripeost comb *and eight bouts, . been guilty of some violation , . of the Stamp Aet; consequence of which, an Extent issued against coach and horses, for penalties and costs, .to the louat of 490. 'they applied to Mr. Joseph Hilt, their difficulties ; but that person not having the money himself to advance, he borrowed it of the plaintiff, Sharman, and then released the coach and horses, he himself taking possession as a security for repayment of the money. The plaintiff being able to obtain payment from Hill of the money he ..lent, issued execution . against the coach and lorses ; but the Sheriff returned nulla bona. In con. nience of which, the present action was brought inst the latter; for a false return; and the case ig referred, as above stated, the arbitrator award . in favour of the plaintiff, although he expressed some doubt upon the law ; it not being satisfactorily maue out that any consideration had passed from the indif to Hill. It war, however, now sworn dis tinctly, that Sharman had actually advanced the ' money to the latter, in the way above stated. Under these circumstances it was contended, that 'the Court could not open the case again, the arbitrator having come to a final adjudication upon the law and the - sits of the case, there being no suggestion of injus- ' or misconduct on the part of the arbitrator. In ippon of the caee for the plaintiff, Chace v. West more, 13 East R. 357, was referred to. Mr. TOPPING, Mr. GURWLY. and Mr. Esrieessz, support of the rule, contended tliat the Court ight to set aside the award. They submitted that arbitrator had mistaken the law in deciding that , previous judgment obtained by Sharman against was conclusive evidence of the validity of the debt upon which the execution was founded ; parti. cularly as distinct evidence in point of fact was offer , that there had been no consideration for the judg ment, no money having been lent by the plaintiff to Hill. The affidavits in support of the rule distinctly sffirmed this circumstance, and when it was ;hewn )at the arbitrator himself had expressed some doubt, well upon the law as the fact, it was hoped that the Court would do what justice required, by sending the case back again to the arbitrator for review. If were permitted the defendant to go into the affi ivits, it would be :hewn that Mr. Oil had acted a Jost exuaordinafy part in this transaction, he had assumed almost as many shapes as Proteus. He was irst. the Attofney of Alexander and Fox; then the )uyer of the coach and hones; next the supposed debtor of Sharman, pretending that he had borrowed 100 from him, for which he had given a warrant of attorney against himself, upon a judgment against' \imsele, upon which he entered up judgment against imself in the name of a man named Sharman $ then having taken out execution against himself, he went with the Sheriff's officer to point out his own'l Supposed property; he then gave notice of a motion in the Common Plans to set• aside the execution in ;uney ; and having obtained the rule he issued a' fresh writ in Middlesee, and again went with the Sheriff's officer to seize the same goods, and then be 'simself brought the present action in the name of Sharman, against the Sheriff of Surrey, for a false return. On these grounds it was submitted that the ‘ward of tho arbitrator should be set aside. The Cotner, after material deliberation, were of opinion, that the award of the arbitrator could not be set aside, inasmuch as th e whole case had been laid before him for adjudication, he himself not .having expressed any wish to have the opinion of the Court! upon the point of law in question.—Rule refused. 1 TUB KING O. TUCKER. Mr. NOLAN chewed eauite arinst a role for a maw daises, commanding two Magistrates of the County of Devon to discharge the defendant, a Church's?. den of the parish of Raberton, art of custody, hay. ing been committed to the County Gaol, for refusing to account for a certain balance of parish money re. maining in his hands at the time of his bankruptcy. The defendant had obtained his certificate, but the parish had never attempted to prove the above-men tioned balance under his commission, and the ques tion for the opinion of the Court was, whether the defendant's certificate discharged him froni his liabi lity for this debt ? The COURT ruled, •upon the authority of Rex v. Egginton, 1 T. R. 369. and ex parte Exley, 6 Vele jun. 811. that this was a balance which might have been proved under the Bankrupt Laws, being a debt ' v presenti, and therefore made the Rule absolute. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, N0V.27. TAYLOR v. • WATIRS. This morning the loafs CHILI Jvsricn gave judg. ment in this cause. It was an application to the Court to set aside the verdict for the plaintiff, and ester a non-suit on the ground that the action could not be supported. The action had been brought by Mr. J. Taylor against Mr. E. Waters*, for having prevented him from en. japing an admission to, and being present at the per formances at, the Opera Boole. Th• title re ibis privilege was derived from Mr. William Taylor, who, as Manager of the concerns of the Opera House, 'bad granted it to a Mr. Goodison, by whom it was granted to the plaintiff, who bad enjoyed it without saterroptien until 1814, when he was excluded by. the defendant. It had further appeared from the, application made to the Court, that the whole of the concerns of the Opera House we:.• in the. month of August, 1799, vested in certain trustees by deed, which directed them to receive the revenue, and apply it to certain purposes. These trustees, how.. ever, had not exercised their functions as such, but left the whole management, &c. &e. in the hands of! Mr: W. Taylor, until the year 1804. In the year 1799, and of course during Mr.W.Taylor's manage. ment, he made a rant to Mr. Goodison of six silver (free admission) ticketi for 21 years. One of these was given by Mr. Goodison to the plaintiff (Mr. J. Taylor), who constantly used it until 1814, when Waters excluded him. He then brought his action, end got a verdict. , The grounds. of the objection to the verdict were two :—First, that this befog an intereet arising from lands, it could not (by the statute of &awls) be vest..., ed without u deed,. and here no deed was The second ground of objection was, that if there ',were no deed necessary for such a grant, Taylor bad no legal sight to make it without the concurrence 4* the trustees, who alone had such authority. The LoaDCuiss kauc i a, in giving judgment, that stiolow e 1 thairiblidesoa s were valid. ('he first was at er tlit did not appear that this iid• inission wai an t lead, but sillcenie l to enjoy certain privilegiil the• land, and be clue' the case of Webb v. Paternaiter.,(Palmer 71, and 94 Rolls Abridgement 1431,, where it was held that a Ilten'se to enjoy certain pritlege on lands was not an interest in those lands, and.therefore did not come within the statute of frauds. 1.3 the case of Webb v. Paternoster ibe plaintiff had got from a land-owner 4)le privilege of stacking his bay on his ground for aCertain time. Before that time was expired, he let the lands to de fendant, who seat in his cattle, which eat-some of the hay so stacked. The plaintiff brought .his action, and it was helJ that he had a right to recover, his being only a license to exercise a certain privilege on, ant an interest in, the lands. The present case was analogous, fdr here there was not an interest, but a license to enjoy a privilege. With regard to the second objection, the Court held that as the Trustees did not act, they left the whole of tke management. &c. to Mr. W. Taylor, who was in the eyes of the world the person with whom any engagement relative to the concern was to be made. They had not disputed Mr. T.'s right to give the six silver tickets, and as they suffered them to he admitted from the ear 1804 (the time they took the management on themselves) up to 1814, it was to be presumed that some valuable consideration had been given for them. On these grounds the Conn refused to set aside the verdict, and the rule was discharged with costs. MANSION Hovsz.—Yesterday James Joituois . was brought up, and underwent a final examination, charged with stealing from the iron safe of Messrs. Hewitt and Bourdillon, of Friday-street, Cheapside, Solicitors, about sel2o in Bank notes, Several hun ' died pounds in bills of exchange, drafts, itc. toge ther with other papers of great value. The particu-. lays of this case have already been fully detailed, and yesterday the depositions having been read over to the several witnesses, the prisoner was fully commit ted for triali and the parties were bound over to prosecute. Anne Smith, about 17 years of age, irfai charged with stealing from the shop of , Mr.Vritht, of Aid. gate High-street, linen.draper, a piece of: calico 26 yards in quantity.—George Lanai, a person acCideli. tally passing that way between twelie and one o'clricit . yesterday,. said he observed the prisoner arid antler woman close to the door of the prosecutor. cl' 6 soner seined the property iri question, awl &liberatea" walked away. Witness, however, followed and se : cured her. She was fully committed for trial. ~. John Hyams and SareaciNorikwere finally examined charged with burglariousli , entering the dwelling house of Mrs. Beniatirin, of Houndsditch, and steal ing from thence a large quantity of wearing apparel; and other property. The particulars of this case have .also been published.—The prisoner Noah, who it ap pears bad . been led into the crime by the wiles of Hyams, was allowed by the LORD MAYOR to become 'an evidence, and beside his testimony as to the pre ' sent charge, he related circumstances of other consi derable robberies, in which his companion had been. engaged.—H yams was fully committed for trial. r Samuel Foster was charged with burglar iously break ing open the dwelling-house of his mother, iu Saville Mews, America.square, and stealing from thence a quantity of wearing app.rel, the property of Mrs. Noon. The prisoner, it appeared, was a seaman, and lately returned from the attack on Algiers. nce with which he was charged was commit the month, of May last, when he sas seen en tering the window of his mother's house by a man named Atkins. kle,akerwards broke open the chest of the man named, rifled it of the property men tioned, and escaped. Being met accidentally in the neighbourhood on Tuesday, he was apprehended by Yinnenley, the Officer. The prisoner was fully committed. Wonsme.rrairresterday Joseph Prescott was brought np in custody of Edward G eed, the Officer, and examined before Sir WILLIAM PALMAS / on a charge of stealing a mare, the property of Mr. James Faradon, of Somerstown, near Cirencester. The prosecutor is Proprietor of the Cirencester waggon, and was coming with it to town, on the `2sth of Oc tober, when the driver met the prisoner at Guildford, and knowing him, let him ride the mare, which was in company with the waggon. They proceeded as far as - Kingston, where prisoner contrived to get offs with the mare, bridle, and saddle, and a great coat; on being missed, immediate pursuit was made, and he was traced to London ; the mare was discovered to have been fold by him to the landlord of the Coach and Horses, Holywell Maui he had Oispoiled .of ' the saddle to the hostler, and the great coat to another. MD. On being apprehended, he coofeesed.the fact. He was fully committed for trial. ' MARLDOROUGH•ITRZET.—YestenIii Hugs Swains!' Was charged with stealing fi quavtity.ot lace fives tiro shop tot Mesdames BritpUbs, haberdashers, ' by Ox ford.street. The prisoner was detected in beim of getting the lace. from tile window, by means ()llama ducing a :aids . with aTin atitred.w the...head of it, through a hole by which a screw fastetrod thosbutter. He was committed for . trial. • .~ ...~ A linen-draper was fined sC.S at tlr suit of. David Thomas, informer, and Edward Muedithr • Oakley street, Lambeth, far -selling . .. British thread lace, without having such writteD over their doors. - QUEIII.BQUARIL.--George Andrews and 23ema; Smith. who are generally termed .B.esurrection Mrs, were brought from Fulham watch-house. in the custody of Nutley, the constable of Fulham, upon a charge of stealing dead bodies that morning. in Fuihins church-yard.—John Nutley said, he was on duty, going round the .parish of Fulham that morning ; about two o'clock tube was passing by the church yard, he heard voices in the • yard. be walked to the gate. and two men rushed by him as fast as they could c the prisoners came up .with -implements in their bands, such as' lse believed they used toget pos session of the bodies, viz. a spade, a cleaver 40 open the coffin, a cord, a mattock, kc. • He secured them both and took them to the watch-house. The pri soners had . just begun their besiness when he dis turbed them—Mr. - FIELDING said, thaelibe bad not proved any charge against the prisoners, and be-dis• chargedthem. The landlord of the Cooper's Arms 'public-house, in Stratton Ground, Westminster, gave inhumation at this Office, that his house was broke lamas Tues day evesimg, or early on Wedtieaday morning, it is supposed by agirg of notorio us characters, %I Rightly committing robberies in dtiffes eise Westminster. They brok e through with at crow the wood parings which led into a lone adjoining the tap room, forced the hinges, door, and expected to have gained easy atter bar, where the landlord had left a considet e bi of money ; they, however, were deceived, door was double bolted, on both lock and bin tit the door,. and although they bad got the o ff the door, they could not effect any rim trance, and being disturbed they decamp e d, a crow bar behind them.—The Magistra te Officers orders to use their utmost exertieri out who were the villaias. Iteuticays.—Tuesday, an Invest was held m Workhouse, on the body of Mary Woodhme, whit% as wentiou.d in our Police Report of titer day. 3, labourer, said, about tweet' o'clock on Sunday rtornio a person moaning, and saw a woman lying on her', passage of the creat of Miss ti • cited n men, who came, awl found her as stove, h:r brtaa and she had on a soldier's old jacket ; she seat fifteen" Very dirty, as if she: tad barn rolled in the mud. A u stated, that about one ce Suntlay morning Ow taw th qnd her busbasid coining quktly down l'honix•street, z *ben a watchman asked them where they were (loitt, * was his business to look after such pc. pl.:. tie old be was going to his lodgings. The was oilman then ;Seized bun by the breast, and shook him viilleuly ;6, sot sty whether be struck him. Ibith he and his wite,Lo and as soon as be got up, be ran off; they both appear crowd assembled round !hem, and one mail by acrid, her breast. Wituess conceived her to be hi a wa:clunan would take care of her. 1. Northy, aro man, corrobor..ted the latter part of t!..is gateman, that the wataimati's name is Francis Gamble; that in Charlotte -street, and consequently he was off hi the time. John Woobine, an itinetar.t Mier, hug deceased, deposed, that the watchman said to him H—U do you do out at such bouts I told hie; the way from Limebouse. He then said," you L._ know that I could get tun. by you r. I told him wt quietly borne. On which he directly collared me, me about, and nay poor wile, who had hold of thrown one way,wbilst I was thrown another. 't I could not End her, and 1 ma 'e my azy home could, and a s. Oman and a girl led me to toy laud Mg nay wile did nut come borne, I begged my land out to look for her, but she did not. she had let II I had occupied, in the course of the day, and 1 mu a garret. Finning the deceased did not came how that on discovering her hula room let, she had *at. She was subject to fit* from her chat hood. i hear her uniil nine o'clock co Sunday *lien I she •bad been gonad dead in a passage. 1 was b Co)erain, in Ireland, and came to' this cowtoy yt was married to the deceased at Shoreditch Churso laisiettimier made many severe remarks en the 1 ot the watchman; but the last wasteieLa.l slated I be Sid not itrilieeither bins or h., wife, and tLat allerie,*biatokoitog thewas seized witli a tit, of lajt without istande, she expired. hid toe *at either of them, he should have tat !t his duty to rt , hfrtitositurn such a verdict as would semi him .14hry, 9pf4et.•considerable consultation, .returned 'Died by a tit, asid the severity of the wemher. DIVIDENDS to be Ltade at GUILDHA Dec,l4, C. West, Bucklershury, warrhou.eat Nuv. 14, J. White, J. G. Cot/Inane, and W. Bias' boukseliers, at eleven. Dec. 14, it, tallovi-chandler,at twelve. Dec. 14, ;,aic square, merchant, at twelve. lice. 14, ;...;041, , wine.broker, at twelve. Dee, 14, It. )hater, I 'Borough, ironmonger, at ten. Die. 14, loan N. Winchester-street, merchant, at tun. Dec 14, Lloyd's Coreeshuuse, Insurance broker, at twelve Palmer, Bourtou on the Water, Gloucestershire, Dec. 14, liteph. Pryor; Cambridge, tin?Lte-wort Dec. 14, W. stedgrave, Great Queen street, lea ca brass•founder, at twelve. Dec. t 4, Thus. Harrel St. James'nequare, tailor, at twelve. Nu+. 4, I. and 1. Kennion, jun. Nichul-s-mne, brokers, at tie 3: Foreman, Sieersest, evir:minter,,at one. Dec. it White Hurse-yard, wound; draper, at eat. rea Ampthill, Bedfordshire, grocer, at one Dec.ll der, jun. Criticised-triers, tiler:bunt at twelve. Saenders, fitraud, linen-draper, at eleven. Dec.t7 Blackman-street, bookseikr, at ern. Dec. 17, 3t Sloane-street, wine merchant, as ten. Dec. 17 Austin Priars,.merchant, at ten. Dee. 17, John! . Wycombe, hnendraper, at twelve. Lkc. 17, Will; lane, carpenter, at eleven. Dee. 21, Louis hose main Constant, Wellciose-square, sugar rehuer, a 17, 1 homas amine, Lowestoffe Imam instil Dec. 21, Charles Christian, Brea d -street, talivo Dec. 111,Sainnel Gower, High Holborn, engineer Dleeua Sellers, of Fetter-hone, oilman, at tea. L %V blebronk, Little Mourfivlds, wine merchant,. N at. Parsons Meek.r, dasinghall stre, t, merch.i 17, William Vilkte, Lucas-street, Commercial-no I nor.. Dec. 3, W at. Ma , :kei.nie, caveat-garden, 1/IV IJENIII tn be made in the COL Dec. 16, John Gowen, kleveningluon, Scfloli per, at eleven, at the Angel inn, Haicswurth. Barlow and Joshua Gregory, Sheffield, Torkihi at twelve, at the Hotel, nhelfield. 'Dec. 17, Tien chile, near Skiron, cotton-spinner, at thr( Manchester. Dec 17, W at. Cosslet, Caerphill eleven, at the Castle, Merthyr l'ydvil. Dec. 2 Smith, Norwich, shawl ntanufActurer, at tour Hotel, Ni,rwich. Dec. 16, Vent. Eyre, Nen merchant, at eleven, at the Mormons ‘trrnf, C; 17, John Doughty, I.eadenhani, Lincoln, jal.,.'ael White Lion, Skaford. Dec. 19, 116bett ter, Bideford. baskets, at eleven, at the New In SI, Rdward Houghton, Ilmtusgrove, tntrcer, Star and Garter, Worcester. Dec. lR Wit ford, makers, at twelve atthe Red Lion, tV/ Robert John Toplis, Nottingham, spiri: rc the Ram, Nottingham. Dec. Ss, Jets Furnis . , arieleven, at the George, Liver Foul. Dee. Is, I Walktr, Klrkhridge, and lames Read m.al, Ga ) It twelve, at the Golden Linn, N. t ths!;etter. PWlllps, of &Wei, grocer, at eleven, a. thee , ' Brig& Dec. 19, homa , cud St.,,noferl Fosearth, merchants, William Stantr.:( ;s , 1,;; L the Rose and Crown, Sudbury. Dec. I 7, John ham, grocer, at tea, at the Union, Bitty! , i:tan BIRTH. On the 11th instant, in Burretrect, Sr. Jai Captain Hall, of a laughter. MARRIED. Monday, at St. Andrew's, Holborn. Geer Gray's lusrplace, to Hebe, daughter of !.ex Islington. DIED. . Tuesday, at Taplow, Berks, in tie 7-2 ct yc.ir ham Roberti, Esq. P.1.1'. f.,r Worcerrr. Sunday, Nov. 24, I HI 6, at Ellison VI :re, Nev Frodatrick I.aye, aged live sears am( tig!tt me of Polakin.General Royal Artillery. Saturday morning, Sarah trances Valry, ofi Shiner, of Southend, aced 11 months. . _ PRIGL Oe: Boni Stock 3 per Ct. lied. 69f rOnto Cons. 631 631 4 per Coos. 770 -6 per Cent. Navy 951 Lung Anna. 161 3.10 .YEslEit India Si India 11. , t rig Imp. Alin, Exchrquerk Cate. for Aci Lottery COAL MAK K E Skips at Market. 121 Newcastle 1 Sunderland Ships 11 NO V LNlb sold. ' 58i 471 HIGH WATIA TO MORROW AT 1,0: Morning . . 51 Afternoon - - . 2i LONDON• Printed by ',saga KIN I'. Published there, and at the Stat.osce, -