Star. — London, England, 1816-09-14 00:00:00

:"ru'rmcvnerrir . _ I , COVENT-G;IRD.EM TREATRE. Last night Mrs. CZNTLIVRIeI Comedy of The Wonder was performed, when Miss Boitut made her ,Arst appearance on any stag: in the character of riokuite. Her voice is not strong but she speaks sen sibly and clearly. In the scenes with I)on Felix par ticularly sbe displayed the various conflicts of passion with truth, vivacity and spirit, and her carriage was Unembarrassed. Don Felix, by Mr. C. Katsina, was an admirable effort of the art. His agitation, and the'' quick variety of his emotions, were faithfully and for cibly expressed. Mr. FAWCETT, with his sound sense and sterling comic genius, could not tail to give a fine effect to Lissardo; Mrs. Gums, in Flora, and Miss MATTHEws, in batik), were a imir able.—The Seraglio- billowed, and the Farce of Killing No Murder cbncluded the night's amusements.—The house was fashionably and fully attended. THEATRICAL DISPUTE. TO THE EDtrog. , Theatre Royal, English opera -house, Sept.l3, 1816. SIR—In fulfilment of my promise, I trouble you, • I trust for the last time it will be necessary, with a few observations on Mr. Kinnaird's publication of Thursday: I find myself, therein called upon to ac count for having Gi garbl...d" Mrs, Orger's letter by the omission of a line ; and it is with unafficted re luctance that 1 prepare to do so, because it renders necessary an exposition of Mr. Kinnairri's feelings • and conduct as a Manager. whichlhateing, I repeat, no ill-will personally towards him,) for the sake of his own credit, I had much rather have suppressed. In the-first place, Sir, I must inform you, that I had heard from undoubted authority that Mr. Kin. : naird had expressed his determination that any per former venturing to act in this Theatre after his in junction to the contrary, should be marked. It may be necessary to explain what is here technically meant by marling performers :—it is understood to imply that the offending parties shall be degraded while they continue in the Theatre; and at the expi ration of their engagements, that they shall be dis charged ! This is the accepted interpretation of the word, and in Using it Mr. ICinnait d cannot be sup posed to have had any other meaning. Now, Sir, before I sent Mrs. Orger's letter to you for publication as a necessary part of my first doeu iment, it struck me very forcibly that she bad un guardedly committed herself by a pointed expression that might possibly subject her to the fulfilment of the vindictive threat which I heard had been tittered by Mr. Kinnaird, and therefore purposely omitted it, ,In order to guard her against the danger of such a result. It would not be supposed that Mrs. Orger, in addressing Mr. Bartley, could deem it requisite to inform him, that Mr. Kinnaird was " one of the Mem bers of the Sub-Committee of .Drury•lanelheatre ;" and it certainly struck me, that Mr. Kinnaird would consi der this peculiar designation, as an attempt on the part of Mrs. Orger, to attach to him all the respon. sibility he his assumed; and that he would treat it as an avowal, that she had received this injunction from Mr. Kinnaird as ONE of the Sub-Committee only . in contra-distinction to the usual mode in which con:rat:locations are made to the Performers from the Sub Committee collectively—namely, through the acti'ig manager, as their deputed officer. 'rims, Sir, I have explained (I trust satisfactorily) why I omitted the line above quoted ; and which omission, intended to protect Mrs. Orger from the possible effects of a ruinous act of vengeance, has been construed by Mr. Kinnaird into an intention to "'garble" her letter ! Mr. Kinnaird states, that 1 have " obtruded this case (10r what reason lie cannot guess) unnecessarily. upon the public." This I deny. It has become, at length, indispensably necessary that I should guard my property against the perpetual and unwearied at tacks which Mr. Kinnaird has made (and seems re solved to continue to make) upon it; and which I base with some patience endured, andlepifrom public ' notice, during many past months. Thais reason, I think, Mr. Kinnaird might have guessed, without calling for a public avowal of it. Mr. Kinnaird affects to consider the insertion of Mrs. Orger's letter, and his own to Miss Kelly, as a el public refutation" of whin he is pleased to call my es personal attack" upon him. I deny all personality excepting such as may affect him as a Member of the Sob•Conunittee, who, as it appears to me, is acting on his own personal responsibility, in direct violation of chi Act of Parliament, and to the obvious injury • and discredit of his constituents. As to his " public refutation," I must presume to think that Mrs. Orger's letter is any thing but that. She clearly sets him right in two errors in his own 'Utter ; and very fairly atknowledges, that had 'she . 4 1tot conceived him to have implied a " TOMCAT, that she should not have beat intimidated, or have considered her self bound to 41 guided by his injunction !" la all that :elates to tie question respecting Miss j Kelly's performing at Drury - l a n e T heatre, I cannot . 110 better than transcribe the following c , zespol. levee Golden-square, Thursday morning, $ Iffy dear Mae Kelly-1 am this moment leaving town, and shall hope to receive your answer on my return. 1 fin.: Mr. Kinnaird has thought tit to publish his letter to you of Saturday sett, in order to mime the charge of having, du his own r solidity, declined your services at Drery.lane Theatre while - Z Baglisit Opera .continues open: I therefore trust you will no longer object to foretell ate with a copy of your answer to that Oeudeinan. lam aware that the objection you have hitherto expressed has arisen from delicacy towards the Sub-Committee. It appears to me that the same feeling should now induce you io allow Its publication. Having understood that the Sub•Casnadas tee are not patties to the measure proposed by Ms.Kisailed.= iffe called upon to acquit them of par tiel p adon in an act the world will p:obably consider as unjust, inipolitle, and op pressive. 1 hive also to request that you will furnish me with the pani c/dal of your previous conversation With Mr. Kinglitti,te which be alludes is having taken place on Thursday, in order that I may acquit myself of the chair of having mss-states facts, when I asserted that Mr. Kiunaird bad expressed his i-diedwal inten. don not to " employ or receive" your services .t Drury-lane ?Inure until after the dose of eke English OperSill'ouse. I am, Ste. e. 4. ARMIIILD. Thursday, Sept. 12, 181 6. MY IiZAR Sia—When Mr. Kinnaird proposed to relinquish my services at Drury-lane Theatre till the close of the English Opera-HOuse, in order le save the Theatre the expiate ass Sa r y, Twill venture to-assert, that 1 replied in nearly the kn. lowing words:—That however mortifying to me his prOposal (inasmuch as it proved how lightly he estimated osy services), 1 was willing to attribute it to his zeal for a concern. site poverty of which could alone have suggested to him an act of ouch paltry economy towards one, wii.e.l invariable assiduity is tilt per formance of her duties to tilt t'ublic and the lileatre, might by wine be considered a claim to indulgence. I added, that I moss certainly should'avee to it ; but begged to understand bins, who user t was to amides his propetalas a personal commaakados - r -'--' if that which he antleipeell ',goalie the feeling of the Sub+ Committee ? To which he replied--" Ceruinly, speak to yo* as Mr. Kinnaird, of that which, I am slim they will think just to propose." This conversation took 'Ohm an Thursday tbq litb, and bat hearing from the Sub-Committee of Friday, I wasted on Mr RIO on Saturday morning to know if I was summoned (as usual) with the rest of the performers to join in " Coo save the King," at the rising of the Curtain ; or wheiher be bad received any official notice to decline my services ? He told me imbed not, and most certaitly should err in his duty, were he to make me an tamps dots to the general summons ; and that he felt justified in rep. lacing his conduct. towards the performers at the English Opera , House, by that which was pursued previous to the close di Drury Lane, last season. In consequence of this conversation, I pre pared to attend in the evening ; and, while I* was dressing, re ceived the letter which Mr. Kintiaied has thought proper to give to the public; bus which it was then too late to notice, l did attend the Theatre, and on Monday morning declared to him my motives for so doing, in a note, of which the following is a copy t 70 US 110 N. DOUGLAS KINNAISD. MOnday, September 9,1816. Sia—l perfectly recollect every word of the conversation that took place in the presence of Lord Essex; and certainly_sbouid have written in answer to your proposal, had I receivtd it in due form from the Sub-Committer, which you led me to expect as a matter of course, when you stated it to be (at that period) merely a suggestion of your own : the conversation to which you do me the honour to refer having taken place on Thursday, I anticipated some communication from the Sub-Committee of Friday : re mitring none such, previous to the opening of the Theatre, I did not choose to absent myself, thereby incurring the risk of some future accusation of having neglected a duty which it - eras in my power to fulfil, more particularly as the contradictory paragraphs of your letter (in wnleh I find you snitki tais and decline respond- . bility, In which you 4r ine the honour to prohibit, and then do me the favour mot to pr0,....it my attendance) render it necessary foe me to act with great circumspection iu a matter which is very likely hereafter to become a question of some importance to one or both of us : I shall, at present, abstain trout all comment on the other parts of your letter; and conclude with acquainting you, that 1 hold my services in readiness to obey the summons of the acting Manager, under such accommodation as it may be in Mr. Arnold's power to afford, and which I understand he has offered. I have the honour to be, Sir. yobr most obedient bumble servant, 1. 11. DELL'S. All this I have before told you officlally ; and thus far I think I have enabled you to refute any attempt on the past of Mr: Kinnaird to prove yoif guilty of misrepresentation of the circum stances relating to my case: he will not, I think, provoke you to a more detailed statement of it, when he recollects that his man-. ner in making the communication was such as to draw from ate expressions which mu t have indicated wounded feelings, although every thing like resentment was carefully suppressed.. But if you still see the propriety of publisting my scrawl, you have my con sent to do so; for if Mr. Kinnaird (of course considering in all be does the sanction of the Sub-Committee) thinks it creditable to hfinself to publish his proceedings, I cannot he accused of die- respect to their feelings personally, oe their interests collectively, in giving publicity to the circumstances which involve me in the present subject of discussion. During a very long service in my profession, I have most zea lously adhered to the interests of Drury-lam 'Theatre; and though I am now called upon in some measure to oppose the I proceedings of an individual of its managing department, from motives of justice towards you, and pecuniary advantage to my self, 1 still prole!s to be, and hope to prove, a steady though an humble pillar to the cause; huarik, indeed, since Mr. Kinnaird assured me, that my credit with the publio was decreasing, from my its frequent appearance is my prelacies Ur I need opt tell you ! (though I kid him) that I rather differed with him (*this poiut 1 (and more particularly as It forms his excuse for non-payment of my salary at Drury-lane), for I cannot too often acknowledge to you, that I owe all the advantages of a speedy progress in may I profession to your friendly zeal in placing me constantly before b42)y the a.t eine; and if th e numerous performers now ranking high in -lane Theatre, who are equally indebted to you, were here to add their opinion of you (by way of postscript), I know of no theatrical document more likely to be creditable to you. Do not fail to add to the insertion of my letter toMr.Kinnaird that expression of good feeling and respect for the Sub-Com. mince, which you know I am ever animus to offer as a reosn for the kindaess and aueotion I Dave espertenced duri:z their reign.—i am, dear Sir, ever sincerely and gratefully yours, M. SILLY. Greatly regretting the necessity for t roublingt you at so much length—l am, Sir, your obedient servant, a. J. ARNOLD. MANSION HOUSL—Yesterday William Appleton, Henry Wright, and James Bennett, the latter apparently not twelve years of age, were brought up in custody of Sapwell, the officer, charged with stealing £4, in bank notes, from the shop of Mr. Wood, the grocer, in Bishopsgate-street, on Thursday last.—The prose cutor deposed, that on the day mentioned, the younger prisoner came into the shop, and asked for some candied horehound. The clerk, at the moment, was en4aged in marking some bank notes ; but not suspecting the intention of the young delinquent, turned round to procure the article he desired. The prisoner, instantly stretching- his arm acrou the counter, seized four of the notes, and fled. The witness, who was in an adjoining office, perceiving the transaction, instantly pursued, and, together with the other two prisoners, who were waiting on the out 'side, secured them, and gave them all in custody to the officer. They were remanded. Bew-sTrutxr.—Yesterday John Morris, driver of the Paddington coach, * appeared on two • summonses, for carrying more than one passenger on the box with the driver. The offence was proved by Mr. Curtis, one of the Maestrates for the county of Middlesex, who saw the defendant, on the 3d inst. about eleven o'clock in the forenoon, driving his coach along the New Road, at which time there were two persons besides himself riding on the box.—De fendant said, in answer, that be did not know that he was doing wrong ; That he certainly bad two passen ger, on the hoe, and five on the roof ; and that ail the short stages do it. Ile was convicted in the tigated penalty of five pounds and costs, and the other information, charging him with a similar of fence, on the sth inst. was withdrawn. John Camp Sell, of Stephen -street, of Tottenham-' court Road, baker, was convicted in the mitigated penalty of ss. per ounce, and costs, for having sold to Mark Buckingham, on Tuesday last, a quartera loaf, deficient in weight five-ounces. Tan PROOF POSITIVEo•- 46 It is easy to advise a murk repel, but who will give hiss the otoortmaity r—Some time ago a very notorious fellow was tried before a Judge in the North of Ireland, but who, by a mint of law, fortunately for himself, escaped eonvietion.--r The Judge, however, was so convinced of his guilt, that he could not helpinforminglim of the narrow escape he had hail from a just penishinont, and ad. monishing him to amend his life, to puisue other courses, and sincerely to repent of what he had doses. , Place your Lordship's Honour, (cried the fellow)" I am as ridy to repent as any man need be." 66 Then (said the Judge) get into some honest service, and strew, by your conduct, that my advice has been of use to yen."—ff Arrab I nowe.my Lord, that's the very thing I want ; and they say hate that your: Lordship's Honour has just been turning alone* of your own sarvents--Och ! there, says I Paddy ifol looney, you have the lock of it; and, to bolus% if you engage with me, I mast be after prating. in your cuvice.".- 64 Take the follOw luny .imusodiosoly, (cried the Judge) and let me lynx ao iiitiod Ia Penance or his tiapoeloncee ; - • LANCASTER ASIZES, REPT.7. CURIOUS TRIAL TO ABATE A NUISANCE. • THOMPSON W. HARMS. Mr. Seaneerr stated the case. The plaintiff is a cheesemonger. and defendant a farrier, in the town of Preston. A new street was 1 dely budt in that town called Lune-street, composed of respectable houses, and inhabited by respectable people. Among these were a clergyman, an attorney, the plaintiff, and se veral other individuals of wealth and consideration in the place. The defendant likewise purchased a por tion of the ground in the vicinity of this street, and built upon it, as he had a right to do. He built first a small house for keeping a cow, alum eight yards from the back court of the plaintiff. To this erection the plaintiff could have no possible objection, and he made none ; but he was rather surprised, when in April last lie saw a chimney rising over this cow house, and still more surprised and annoyed when smoke began to issue from it, and hammers to play within it—in short, when he saw the cow house con. 'cued into a smithy, involving his premises in smoke, and stunning his family with noise. Nothing could be conceived a greater annoyance than the incessant din of this forge. or the. volumes of smoke that issue from it, blackening every thing around it, and foicing the plaintiff to have the linen exposed to dry in his yard often to be washed over again, and his windows shut when he would choose to have theM open. 'there could be no•doubt that the law would consider such a building so placed and so used as a nuisance.— Every man has a right to 'enjoy his or property, but he must use it with a reference to the rights of others. Society could not exist without such a principle. So. ciety is held together in a sort of compromise of mu tual reitraint and compensation. If a man, in the ex ercise of his rights of property, builds his house and establishes; himself in a particular situation, no other man bas a right to destroy his comforts, or to molest his posgessioo, by bringi an offensive trade into his immediate neighbour ..... If, on the other hand, the offensive trade is established first, no man has a right to order its removal. The only question in law is the propriety of establishment; and it either abates the nuisance, or permits its continuance, according to this principle. The law does not consult a man's whims, or caprices, or imaginary wants; but it al: lows no invasion of his real substantial comforts, nor any exercise of the rights of property, however just in other respects, that diminishes them. There could be no doubt from the evidence he would produce, that the plaintiff was seriously aggrieved : several of the other inhabitants of the street likewise felt the injury 'as their own. The defendant, accustomed to such noises, might not be so sensible of the disturbance they give, as those who reside near the Falls of Nia gara are said not to be all sensible to their deafening roar; but the plaintiff in the former case, as strangers in the latter, must feel the annoyance intolerable.— Till it could be proved that smoke, noise, and dust, in their most offensive degrees, and brought as near' as possible to a man's dwelling, were not a nuisance, so long must a smithy, situate like the one in ques tion, be declared a nuisance, and entitle the plaintiff to a verdict. He asked no damages—he merely asked a verdict, to remove the annoyance of which ' he so j ustly complained. The Learned Counsel then called-several witneses to prove the nuisance; both of the plaintiff's own family and from among his neigh. boars. His servant deposed, that the clothes hung out to dry in the yard were often so covered with smoke and dust that it was necessary to, wash them over again, and that she was frequently obliged to, shut the windows to exclude such offensive annoy. ances. She stated farther, that the noise was intole rable, and often made the floor and windows shake. Several of Mr. Thompson's neighbours confirmed this statement, and also added their own complaints to his. • . . Mr. Wtrlamas, for the defendant, denied that this smithy could be termed in law a nuisance. He would bring witnesses to prove that they did not consider it as a nuisance ; that the noise was by no means what it was represented to be; and that fewer coats; coals of .a better quality, and yielding less smoke, were burnt in this smithy than on any kitchen or parlour fire of the neighbourhood. This insignificant smithy had been dignified with the name of forge e and the noise of this forge had been talked of as it Vulcan and his swarthy brothers incessantly plied their thundering hammers within it; but it would surprise the Jury when he chewed them that all this mighty noise was produced, not by a congregation of giants, but brthe serveless arm of a boy Of 14. When the noise and the smoke of this little smithy were made the sub ject of complaint,- it was forgotten that they were in the small town of Preston, and within 800 yards of the plaintiff's house, no less than nine steam-engines and four foundries, which really did send forth vo lumes of sound and smoke, that were formidable and annoying. These, indeed, might with some propriety be declared nuisances; but it was difficult to describe what a nuisance was in law, or to determine that de gree of discomfort which amounted to one. Much would depend 11.0 what people considered as the eisentials of their comfort or enjoyments. Some t4ought a fine prospect necessary ; and according to them it would be a nuisance to cut down a tree in your park that added to the beauty of their landscape, or to build a wall that obstructed in the least their view ...some would declare a school a nuisance, because it had noisy boys; others a joiner's shop ; others a staans-engine, and so on. But when people deter mine to live in towns, they must subm't to the incon venience of towns; they are not to expect, amid the nose' and smoke and dust of a manufacturing place, tbs same quietness and retirement as in the country —.they MUM not hope to , 1111jOr in Manchester or Preston the same plod' air .as on the site of W eenier Csstle,'.nr on the top of Skiddaw, The Led Couael called several witnesses for the de fetralant, with the desigi of :hewing that the smithy was not- considered as a nuisance—that the noise was not distressing that fewer coals, and coals of a r qualitY were burnt in it. than in many private houses—that the pliintiff himself did not consider it as a grievance necessary to be remedied by lase; till the defendant had refused to oblige bim by allowing to fix his joists its defendant's wall ; and that Abe foandries end stream-etginesuf the town were nuisan ces, which, if the plaintiff *allowed, took away all ground of oomplaint against this twang smithy. It appeared mach in favour *1 the plaintiff that all the wingless cAlettn .dipprovo the offensive nature of tba smoke and noise lived at t gnaw &tuft tima cting nuisan ces . It pro. the smithy dianthus.% or those whose tvidenmho a dduced in his support. The Learned Jinx., in addressing th e J oey. o u f p t h th e e r w i d r e e n s c p e e , explained t o t h em full ceeded upon this principle—that no man in th. ex : cite of his own rights of proptaty was ent i t l ed to et, the state summ i ng danger the security or diminish the ettjvym ent of ha neighbour in the lawful use of his. A auis doce io law was not what affected the possession and e m u : ment of property through the medium of a whims, caprices, fancies, or imaginary wan ts b : t what destroyed or diminished his real, ration a l, 44 substantial comforts, such as bt inging offensiv e te a d ts into his neighbourhood, the introduction of o ff ensive smells, dust, or noise. Nor WAS it to be co ,t ust.er4 how much a man could endure without hi t ,: health, but how much he could tolerate without 'convenience, and that at all seasons, whether in health or sickness, whether feeble or robust. 14: —ow, the. ~ could be no doubt that the incessant din and pi tc h y smoke of a smithy must he a nuisance to persons c ct • accustomed to them, and so situ ttcd as the p fe . tat seemed to be with respect to the plaintiff. N or ' it any answer to this, that the plaintiff er ,,i,„ ced tbs annoyance of steam-engines and tout,drits The nearest of them seemed to be at t!ie dittc;ct 400 yards, while this smithy was as near as eight; i ts allowing they were nearer, the defendant had no rigkt to add to disturbance already existing. &cos t a man endures one inconvenience without iug, no right can be established on the around cf his'; ; patience or forbearance to 'aggravate it, or to add another. The question for the consideration o f t h e Jury therefore was, what, according to ih: eviden ce , was the state of the facts—was this smithy breughtto the plaintiff's premises, and was it so near as to annoy his comforts ?—Verdict for the plaintiff. NEWGATE LEADENHALL MARK E SEPT. ' (By the Carcase.) Beef, rer atone Its ed to S. eQ V,:al 3s 44 to 5, 01 Mutton .Se 4d to 4s 94 Pork 4s 44 to 5s 41 Lamb, 4,. Od. to ss. Od. /SMITHFIELD MARKET, SEP I'ZNIBER i?... • Beet 41 01 to Ss O.! I Veal 4. 0: to Si se Muctoo 41 Od to Ss ite. Perk 4s 01 to 5s Lamb 51 Ott to 6s 04. Cattle in Smithaill. Beasts 570--Sbeep and Lababs 6,330 —eaves 240—PV sui PRICES OF HAY AND S'rRAW YESTERat ST. JAMES'S. wourtettAset.. Hay 31 lOs Od to 51 156 od I Hay 41 Jlos to 61 Os Straw 12 146 Od to 31 6s Od I Straw 21 166 to 31 31 Clover, 7L Os. Od. to al. Os. sattrormo. Meadow Hay 41 0: to 51 15s I Clover 51 Os to 71 OE Straw .E 2 Ss to .€3 Os. PRICE OF HOPS. ataN lAGI. NEW welters. ' Kent 61 6s to 111 Os f Newt - 0 of to 111 lb Susan 51 15s to 91 W Stissez 71 12s to 111 Os Essex 91 Os w 121 Os j Farnham 111 Os to 111 es RAW HIDES. Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary Is 10.1 to Is 04 1 stone) - 2s 64 to 2s iOd Market Calf 71.estls. Middlings Ss 24 to 2s 44 Eng. Horse ICI to Its 64 Sheepskins Os to 21 03. Shearlings Is sd. Lambs vs oil to 31 6i PRICE OF LEATHER. IN LEADENHALIA 'REEL*. !form 50 to 56Ibs 404 25.1 Calf Skins, 30 to gas 20. 12 Ditto, 56 to 66Ibs 954 464 Ditto 50 to 70ISs 22d 3of Merchants Ratko 004 604 Dip') 70 es Rnihs 7',1. 7.1.! Dressing Hides 144 154 i Small Seals Greenland 41,1301 . Pine Coach Hides 164 17ild 1 Large ditto, per doz. 14+ I. ' • PRICE •F TALLOW. St. James's Market Ss 3d I I own Tallow 1k N Clare Market - us Ad I V elicra 'A ..:(ia :Ist ' ',J N'hiteabapel Market Ss 2,: j NVl:iie ditto Os SI per stone of n 11). ......--. 1 Solr ditto 53s Ctlf ..ji • Candles per dia. los th.l—Mqo;dts, 123 Od. Yellow S.ap, btie.—Mottled, 94s—Curd, B+<--Falco, Ns 4, Lial COURSE OF E.XCHANUE, YES cERDAY. . Amsterdam 40 o /0.211. Bart:: ;nit 00 D.tto at sight 40 9 Bilboa at; Amsterdam 12 vC. F. St.,Sehastian C' Ditto at sight •12 5 • dibraltar SI Rotterdam It 9 4 11. 4 Leghorn, 464 Antwerp 12 9 • - % Genoa; - 43; Hamburgh 36 0 23U. • Venice,n. C. Liv.Pictsis Altona 36 10 21U. ineffective per 1. stet 1111 Paris 1 day's date 25 4 ,- ) Malta 46 Ditto 26 02 U. Naples, 381 Bourdeaot 26 Palermo,•ll44l ptr oz. Frankfort on the Lisboa, 145 Main 151 ex Mo. Oporto, 554 Madrid 34i tractive ttio Janeiro 581 Cadiz 34 of ectiie Dublin, 13 Sitlille 33 • • Cork, 1 31 Aglo of the Bank on Hulaud 2 per Cent. ' PRICI , .S Ot GOLD AND SILVER. Portugal Gold in Coin, per oz. £3 19s Od. Foreign Gold in Bars 9 19% Od. New Doubloons - - S 14s 6d. New Dollars 0 4s 1041 Silver in bars - 0 Os Od. PRICE. OF ai FOCI Bank Stock,shut 3 prr Ct. Red. shut 3 per Ct. Cons. 61i G 2164 4 per Cent. shut S per `:.`ent. Navy 93if 93 :s YESTERDAY. Loci Anna. shut India Stock India Bonds 7 8 pr. Each. Bills 3 5 pr. Consols for Account 45421.10 COUN I Y MAKKE 1 &c. Uxsatooa, Sept. 23.—Whest per load, ~ElB Os to £l5 li!t New ditto, 151 to 201. Barley, per quarter SR. to 41s. Nu 26s to 245. Beans 40‘ to 445. Old Beaus Ws to 00s. Pee 40s to 444. Rye los to 445. Oxroao, Ser. Price of a buibel of wheat 100. Ist"' the Quarrern Loaf, ell. BANBURY, Sept. 12.—Wheat 9s. 611. to 116.0 d. it bushel. fire 675. per sack. Bread 2s. Od: the halt peck. NIWIDURT, ISERIGS—Wheat 744 to 95s Barley 36s to 37s a Oats 28s to 365. Beaus 38s to 475, Peas 43. to 445. CHELMSFORD. —There were samples of new When on Friday List week, but the millers declined pur chasing, from the apprehension, that as the boll; yvas then abroad, it was not likely to be delivered e gad to the sample. As high as 88s. per quarter wa, ho*- ever offered, and rejected. CAMBRIDGE—A considerable quantity of wheat lid been carried during the last three days, in this noieb. bourhood, which dues not appear to have been injured by the late rains. - - . COAL hilaitKii. 1 . sli. P l'EMbLit I'S Ships at Market. Skip 3 sold. Pr:re. IS Newcastle 14 298. 03. to Mi. .... 041 :, 4 Sunderland Si 494. *I. to 445.11111 - 1 Stone Coal 0 OOL od. tc4 ocs. nik: 2 Welsh Coal i 648. pd. to Q" s. u 4 1 Calm .0 008. 04. per ton. .... DIED. Saturday, William Henry Lister, Esq. of Ts'slckent Was Major in his Majesty's 824 Regiment of root. Monday, at Cheltenham, afters short illness, the Rev. George Evans, et Bockland, Herefordshire. Sunday sennight, at fornhaso Ht. Manta, the Rev. John OA D. D. Rector of Burgh and lckburgh, in Norfolk, formerly st Clulat College, Cambridge. HIGH WATER TO MORROW AT LONDON BAIUGSI Morn►ng S 5 min. rater 7 Afternoon - • - 10 ...... XANDON. PRA:L.(I by Lava:. KGNT Plckr: Pace; i'4lolthecl pre, and 14 Ow Star-064, Tarp ears $ , ...... NT .....- ........ ilr 1 on im lire via TO, Oro Mc Con the Mid liz. Di r ••••• TU T 1 the AI a a