The Express. — London, England, 1860-06-08 00:00:00

1 y I IMPERIAL PARLIAMZET. HOME OF LOXIM—TicsrAT, Joss 7. no Lento Camera/Aft boa ha sal ea dm woolsack at Owe Ahab. CILLIIITHOL TLe LORD CHANCELLOR mewed the Gal reading of a bill toe the lemur rumba= of eadented obriblea Tie *OM of the bill ear to ghee winged to the dimity emaimloage• in cake list Um atpAl b eualial be prrr. heal cerium rt... •I,h they wen piellealtoz ory peteat to porfarot i ..iiilytag to the Oeurheif . wltioh was mei:arts, .inattes s daisiz i oiledM i. out]: r r BROI .; II AY, in matting ber aintaia returns con. aerie! with the Cart er Haute and Divorce. owl tut each; :..thing could be mare intidattory than IN court an regaled Ise parsonasi i al vas ebioctive er to ite wastitation. The ....art eight to be otametiteted so a def. few" •cal , WWI !are NAM : and eW their liirilshipe L. Vat it pow-owal the permar net amillf pram:may espirr: .ft of ruarri,d bat the awe of the i • mire tie a.elf. the of the roPertY ' or wait the marr.age. th e y wou ld agree with IC= that he tem warranted la the optima that the soon ought le be otherwise masurael tine rt waa. Ho thought the mart should mama of three judges, a obis( Judge. s c.el• am law or equity padre. mid • of the Osesietmial Omni A mart eo compord aweTd foe= a perfectly MVP pia! Wend . and be Le:iirmed that beyond the east , 1 the Iwo sow judges, there amsl he so f artier bumse of ea- Mla a matter of the bud the Emoted quolion ought ethe hot ocusideratien, bat be beiimod the atones he unwed for would snow slut Urn would be so difficulty ia TheotiANCELLOR weed with hie utak and lamed Mead that the importance I f this mart oou.J sal be emaggerated. sod ties the hmacsal comidaration ought, %dons so obetaci• I. ginog the mart a proper cussbtottoo. Ant he thought parlisoest bad dime well in proaroimg sta tically. He bebmed that the hummer at the oourt had lea duo estistectorily, sad that by actiag with the re arm they hod doss they se aped Zia tumeeneary oaths of Meet TRCSTIErb NORM AGSM, he., BILL. A. the mottos .4 Lord eitaawearrs, this bill was road • tired time and pemol. SJ. ilt J BAN REPEAL ACT rPEAL RILL . .... TEA bill me nod • inow•l SALE OF GAS ACT AIIILNDBF-NT BILL Tbi. Lill prmad thzooo eosin two. MANHOOD SUFFNAGY AND BALLOT. Ler" TEYNHAN tad eneral prillier its favoer of enured *mirage aced rote by balk*, and erred the fol. low.n; : " Test this bare. greatly desiring the seilliemet of the geestr,uufpetiiemreury reform, fee re estrisotioo of men's minds, for the air of the peace of lir country, sal that the brims of parliament may beprosseded with with out art, is willing to give ite most careful renseleration to the prayer of the Feedlot which hare bees preeented to it ha beaux ..4 neared suffrage mad vote ►y ballot ; this being the brodeet teas he the elective !stones which has bees propelled to it by portion. •• That this bore hops. to b. able to discern them who for any reason ought not t., he allowed • vote, and to Point out the ream whereby improper persons may be dimmed • the treader after it is lee ; so that. ea tn, one head, no man aril he left without UN Miners 'net whom tio met ur refitment reseal far his dishaa. t can be mimed ; med. es the other rad s so rum shall he put on the Br of voters, or eontimied thereat, whom 2 just d grounds of dieraseltiesseetit ma be this ; „ auid prove. •• • house is, therefore, prepared to riviosuneed mach &heroism in the crumnal, migrate, bud poor laws as ✓ail memo nemeary to cut off from the register of voters all improver persons. •• In this way the house hopes to greet the spirit of the prayer of its petitioners for manhood suffrage and vote by ballot not ealy without detriment to the common wad but with great advaatage le the stmt." His lordship prefaced his UNASOP by cossidering the right el the people to univered suffrage, both us gross& of 'rural awl abstract right sad el public policy. be support of his views he quoted the tramples of re Bailed the Helvetic Coofederation, sad the trice aepulds, l44l 4 retooled that the mutiny al then Sitars was raciest gearearee fur the benefits of the norm. The time would come when it would tie longer possible for the wishes of the majority of tie. governed to be made subservient to thole the miliority, and he therefore thought that it was net eu'e the wiser e•eiro, but the positive duty cif the hour L, colander moot attentively the prayer. el the petitiosier with a view to their ultimate fuirdrnent. Is conclusion. he advocated the necessity of adding the beast Is the right ti universal suffrage WiJelttYtl it 'Alight be allierod. mil M aimed that the ballot was out us-Merit Earl GRANVILLE said it wee linprear to haw heard the sore lord without acknowierrg the eameelare sad smarty with which lie had v, _ sated the doctrine" he ocesidered so important to the lours welfare of tee coun try ; but this made it all the man imperative ou hint (Ear Grataille) very beady and plainly to staie that it Zr7to kin. that it meld be impossible either be him rsdthe house to corset t., the reseletiess which the betels toe" had peposiet. The form rod lengeres of those reciatious were 'somewhat unusual ; but without. applying I to his sable friend the cheamm .4 committees to decide quarone us which it ireild perhaps hi paieful sad embansagag for him to give an epaulet', he f&rl Urea. olleiseest remark that the nibetasoe tree resolutiess was such as to make it impreade for the house to agree to any same of them. They were time is number, and the house was wheel by adapting them to affirm • fact, sod to exprtme a hope or ingestion. Their lord ships were, however. Ina called epee to say that they greatly dared the settlement of the question of parliamentary re. farm. He Marl Grenville) i t o liclqly desire it. and lie could soot doubt that their f e lt th e same d o l e . He could not, therefore, attribute very this attendame their lordship. that eveniog to any wasted interest in the matter, bus rather to • fern that this re set the mast practical way of dealing with the ;pestles. Bet It would be perfectly impossible for them to dram •• that this ham is wane to give its eared coesiderrou to the peti. Mess for universal salfrage mil vote by he 110.," brier adeptin a Gomel mohair of that sort would be guing a, bar et to imply their tarries of favourably considering that request. They were sent called epee to express a hope that they would he able to eat off his. the register of ...tern all improper penes% which wee one at the moat diteedt Ciampi is could pseUbly be proposal to them to Mr sus, sal the lord adored so scheme for reelling that object. The lest mediation, which ces• laird the pith of the whoa., dec.med that the hare might ✓are is spirit, the pea_ of the petitimen for manhood sieffeare and vote by balm not only without detriment, but with advarege to the eaustry. Now bailer Oramille) wes ea Untimely desirous uf sierra( the moor reproiestaton, sod hard hens endearierise daring some were te elucidate whatever tereissee era he reamed to skew that • cou ✓tier& azteries of the freorrie might Ire race wit& out droner to the enemas wad But vies they came tw reshead eielbews he was oat rowed to give env cous• tarsee te the adaptor so any each propuries. He seed net fellow the noble lord through all his plikeopitital, era isle, historical, and &Moo treasortie reser' foe repair rivenal suffrage ; oared his isereery would fail bin if he attempted to ii.. so, The soles lord had indeed telervedle preadeate, sad this wee always desirable draelleseme onwitat,t4.earl ple+4011•. sat if sera wring warn once mated to by re Here of theasens in the rage of Quer Awr, it we ire that the system we thee tried and eradannal. The example of the prmtersiste al Northamp tonshire could hardly be aptilea. With roped to the at was not to my that universal suffrage et lln the of Henry VI., for the sulfur was then oorred to ftei ooide re ahem. t it. of the peeler objectioes to universe' solfrew was that it was likely, se he believed, is large arstries rote them was • powerful and tangents. bliebed asinaleirettioa, to ter, more than any other form iepresenistir government, sot to the isuproymeot of liberty, bet to the .!estruition of liberty, and the eetabliermat .4 deepodism. (Neer, bear)) Arid when the Noble lord urged the example of lair is France, he (Earl Granville) must remark that the tone .4 preerment which hail amen in Feiner was not orb ae we cord wish 1.. sae arising in Entail". oientor Lad wee, so dooM., r °retry from which very taunt berm .4 Elertv might be loaned, but it we very different from our own eeuntry 114 iii Wee sad in its position, and is all its co,unistaver The noble lord br said that in tleitaerlind, 6.10 as the father put a rids fate his soo's hare to iluehte him for the defame of his remistg,~ that 1.1 lars-•ilie peewee! et the franchise. Yea the soMe 111.14,11 is Engird, to deprive every non is our ermy and eery .4 the trembles, and so the absolute doctrine rele Mow., of the indefeasible right of every man te vote wk... hrl not disgraced himself by ennui. Jew. these and Miter I.e thought it wee nut des,rable to adopt the raeletions m••ve.l by the noble rant (Hera. hear/ The re...let...us were then negatived without • division, ead lbw lo rdships adjeure e d at tee minutes beton eight Ak HOUSE OF COMMONS. —Turas.4y, Jurn 7. The gricAseß ik the chair at four tickle. yy~sThe Iltis Draina,ie Lill was mad • third tine sod "4 1111 . IIELL) MARK la's, BTRIVIII, AND 111.PROVF. NEVES BILL thir J. DUKE moved the ....on., readia4 of this bill 1111ACK!SNON oup.sorl Lire utot. a, on the ground that fibs toU! was a city job, and that it. previsions were is beet amtrareothm at the report el a t 'HMIIII4OO wh:.l had est opus the sabjeet. Ha mowed se an aaaeolu.eat4het f ib s mu b e mad • 'woad time that day .1% raw.ths Kr. Album's BALOYONS sumo. ted the origtsuil 'sibs. WO. Q. LEWIS said the site of Smithfield was now un tsaid it Tam reposed to evert ..pos it a &ad rarat atM plawr at Newiste rnatkrt -blab was al:rsr. tins thedequele far ths pnrpo.ea for wiacis it w mimed. The city .4 Leaky propmed t.. pr.,ri,i s the market entirely at Ikea owe 'spare He trusted Qs ho wit *oda agree to tisk wooed nada( d the bill, wad owl It to a committee upstairs, who would Quota / woad,' the details of the iseener . H e. Mr. ANBURY oapported the ea& rdasnt, lielievih• that the estahhahmeat a a dead market.. lairthaaki w.rrl 1 int,rfere wish thr saratary re pplatiaas of tlb• Lietropolia air It M. PEW observed that usslrr ea:, of • cattle suite% itir hid practiasilii eirecaded these or Nur acres of land fur a stub atone fus the isesupobtas Railway. lb. COWPIZ and be bed been eleimineiehoosendir. none% and be thought the bill fairly amnia! outabeir re. eenrommlatitea . Kr. KO D y r it in ard lie MILL Mr. T. bag aa tie Nedmilmilig a phall 1 1 4 t i = to a Wen ineudies bleb Mr. BOUVIOLIZ AM a MB whit wee to all intents aid purpose, private bill, should mot have mul ti with the stesileg 'Ain for the nrillib . * private Sir G. C. Long iseillp d whether this *.a the proper time to take the oidenion. Tile MB dealt with the interests of the crews, whisk alma a eight of property over cer pri r sa n dw portioed IM bed ~mod iWs bill. He ap that in Amblers ft wail, llaalt with is the mae t eer r eis wd by MU The if* lac. gentleman wee * ill* to the objeetion of the right hoe. m oms the vanabar far Kilmereock (Mr. Bouvene) when Kr as . El i Var li tini abed Ile iliteelore whether it was competent to t he eight bee. solliemNl to addrem the home tines the MIS IMO& ILL odd dot miss i pledge wee given that as Spam woad le preserved for the see and recreation of pels riptides. be amid be dimmed to rent the farther pro of Ws Mr. DUD= thought the objection raised by the right bee. the wassbar for Kihnarnock was a very t ono. ' J. DUKl=Stbet the bill ought to be rderrei not to select bet to a committee of whence. Lord J. BUIIIMILL hie right hon. friend the Bona Lary for the Home Deponleteel bed no objection to the bill l ieLnLrefened to a Nemine of selection after the raced Thel All ine tine reed meow! time, and upon the notice of Si J Donn wee referred to the Oommit telt of Belson= Bab. LOMN)X: CHATHAM , AND DOVER RAILWAY. Er. RIDLEY brc up the report of the canteittee on this bill. The the bill with the exception what portion ef it vba i r t thorised a junction with the stal Ram NATIONAL DEFENCES. Six F. SMITH pea notice that upon the motion for the adjournment of the home to-morrow he would ask the Seorotory for War whether he intended laying upon the table the report of the Gommissiosers on National Defenoes„ and whether it was the intention of the govern ment in the present meeion to adopt any of the mons ememialiene of the mid oormiwiee. GREENWICH HOSPITAL. Sir C. NAPIER pee mitres of his intention on the 19th lent. to move that the hones aboukl, take into oomicle ration wieb tie report of lee eceemiedensee who eat to inquire into the managesoint cd Ctreen OAHE OF JIMII i tUMPORD. Mr. T. DUNOOMBE asked the of State for the Home Department, if his attentiou had been directed to the petition of Jews Muntford, • isboerin; man, of Per shore (presented on the 31st May), complatning of the We forcibly ▪ and outrage perpetrated upon hia wife, in having been forcibly reeouveved after ten weeks' sheen**, and in defiance of the wishes of himself and her relatives, to the !lactic asylum of the county of Worcester, and what steps be hed taken in Or G. 417.Mti ce. esid some time ago • memorial had been mot to him ia reference to this ors, which be for warded to the Onomisisioners in Lunacy fur their report. They invearlipted the cam, and obtained the az plauation of the medical officers of the asy lum. It appeared that the woman was • private patient, and not a criminal lunatic. The onimissiooen wen d opinion that the treatment of the woman was proper, and that there were no mooeds for censure. It appeared that the woman was in • decided state of insanity; hot had improved SO touch in health that she was permitted to go out on trial for • limited time. At the end of that time an awl,,aton was made for her return to the sisylunir which she disregarded. Means were then taken to remove her back to the asylum, when she was found to be in a most filthy and neglected Mate, and requiring the treatment., which she was now receiving. THE REFORM BILL _ _ Mr. BLAKE asked the Ser:vestrylot State for Foreign Affairs whether, in the event of a measure for the amend 'acne of the rtpresentation of the le qw during the present session of perliament for tad alone, a dissolu. Soo and election for Great Britain and Ireland would tars gees, to be followed by elections in Scotland and Ireland on the peeing of the hula for the amendment of the re station of the people for those countries Lod J. larillißLL maid he could not exactly comprehend the redo meaning of the hon. gentleman's question. But Weise amid tell him, that DO dissolution of parliament sari lake place without the exercise of the 're of the row. Wheaever the prerogative of the crown was eserdash, sod her Majesty wee advised to dissolve parliamen t, Ohio then would ft be en electi eAkeonhter.) for Ireland and el well se far IsiL (L POOR -LAW BATING. • Mr. P. WATLIWOTON seised their;ident of the Poor- law Sued wheeler the Melemiltmal letter from the Poor law Cesembeimma I. paresidel, oMcere, dated the 21.'rel of 15... UN, bed over hem withdrawn, or whether the =WGeweidming estimated rental a s th e land rest, the aad tenant respectively paying Miele own proper elmirpes, prevailed in opposition to the laelrnetisms aerobe (laniard ? Mr. VILLIFirri said , ta answer to the drat part of the question, the inatraetiowel letter had never bees with drawn. He was set aware, however, that the letter had any further salberity Una the expression of the opio ion 'of the 00111111M11111000111 at the time. The chief °hint of the teeter was Windiest' to the parochial officer' in what way they should estimate the property which they were to 11111114111111. So ilk/ that letter wee quite clear, for it stated that the gross rental was to be calcadated after the deduction of all charges incidental is:oldie owner or occupier. He believed, however, there was • reference in that letter to the gross redid which seemed to be at VIllialle• with the mower which he (Mr. Villiers) had gives upon • former occasion. Mr. BRADY seldom the noble lord the Secretary of !Mate for Foreign Affairs had, to the question put by tie hoe. manlier for Waterford, not given a very clear answer, he I wished to put • question, clear and distinct, with the ohjeet of getting a Jadeite reply. (Hear, hear.) In the event of the Engluth Reform Bill being passed into law, and no simi. lar bills being passed into law for Scotland and Irelend, would it womanly follow that • dissolution of parliament would tak, place before similar measures .1 refo r m (mai m b e Ipassed for Scotland and Ireland! (" Hein," and laughter.) Lord J. RIJKIELL said he could amours the bon. scutle. moo that be had Garnered the question put to him ill the best way Le could. He was by au means sanguine that he could make the matter clearer. The hoe. member asked whether it • reform bill were pawed for England • dissolu , ties would necessarily take place. Now he bad slated that so diroistioo could take place unless by the exercise of the prerogative of the crown. The parlisment would out asesseardy be dissolved nE the passing of • • measure. Therefore nut mail Int Ma y had been so advised would • dissolution take place. if that advice wee given then • dissolution would produce • general election for tioothiad and Ireland m well se for England. If the hoe. gentlemen wished to know what advice would be given to her Mi,esty .sold only say that at present be could give him no answer. ('' Hear, hear," sad laughter.) Mr. IL BAILLIE "Mid beak the noble lord whether he could state to the home definitively that the Irish and Scotch hills would he withdrawn for the present 110.1. •0. I Lord J. RUSSELL said at the end of the delete this evening he would state to the house the ours which the goverumest would pursue. _ THE REFORM BILL. Oa the order of .I;ed.yioqti;adiourned debate on the Representation of the People Bill for England and Wales being put, ' Pb, .3 . FEW:US...4OS, who had • utilise on the paper of 'an enienduient to the Beet that the house -du sot go into committee on this bill until after the eipoond madams of the Scotch and Irish bill,, said that in commoisoce of the advice which he had re ceived front the Speaker, he did mot intend to take the step which he had proposed, although be believed the course tikes by the goverment wan most uspreceilealled and un euisatitutimal. Instead of moving thimniendinent of which he had given notice, he would move that the debate be ad journed, is order that the goverment might, though in an indirect manoer, so far ae they could, retrace theirstipa Colonel DICILSON, as nipreemitative of as Irish con stitueocy, felt bound to support the moti o n, b u t also disclaimed say party or factious object. He did not wish it to be undo stood that he wee enamoured of the present Reform &IL What he oomph/1W of was that bau fur Ireland sod Scotland should not be intro duced pan paws, and that the house should not have an owortunity of discuming and deciding the one with the others. Ifs would nut now delete than, by discussing the clauses of the Irish bill, but ha mum say be thought they were totally unworthy of coosideratiou. Sir O. GREY said with the experience of late years of the premium of badness on the government, he very much doubted whether the best mode of securing a full and ample consideration to bills of this kind would not be to attempt km in one session. (Opposition sheen.) U this bill should be postponed according to the desire of some hon. members opposite sod takes op again at the beginning of mixt session, accompanied by bootch mid trish bills, there would be much leas clams of a due consideration of the rksoch sad Irish bills than if parliament had missend to the bill fur Eugland,and then,guided by that &meat, had proceeded to the consideration of the bills for Scotland Lad Ireland. He believed that course would be most conducive to the sad professed to be antertairred by some gentlemen, but of this he was sure, that if they were to adjou. n the iiiir coosideratimi of the bill— to day he really did ip,t know—the effect would bet to interpose an uletade to its further magmas wi ilmicisi the boom to corns to say decagon upon that quietism (Hear, bear.) He behoved that many member, of the boons were honest 'rellermiers, and he could understood the feelings with which they regarded the diflicolty that attioded the progress of the bill during • session in which an untamed ponies if their tune had Hai asomearlly ocenpied with the dis c:B,Mon of unsocial mossitsss of extraordinary =,,, and Importsoce but he could not d humourable gentlemen preheats; themselves delirium of seeing the reprosestatios of the people outmoded, and yet leading themselves to them dilatory sod obetrestive mottoes. ((tear, hear.) With regard to the imentioa .4 dissolution, he would only say that if the pre rogative of the mows were 0:e at any MOM it would only operate upon the constitoencies which by the existing law were caraids of electing meinhers ; sad if the present bill penned before the close of this year, it Wadi( he abet, Irately beeessary that many tomtits should sips before :DA' the complatioa al the aim zegialcatioia under tbehill. He not sed tbel no dierelelliep would take piece, but if is malt vrig merely set on the misting oceatituenty, red that would - *Mins to ha the cam until towards the elms ef nazi year. U the bill pare' in the pie mein haw would • have ample time asideio 6 lemeures of the mete nature affecting ftesllted sad Beiaed before the new registration was com pleted Fie therolone sa h i c i ,ad the Muse would not encon. rage then mediene, were eery attempts to delay the tell, liun l E a mem more 17y ite cha racter, and weld enable them to better with the could molls deceived by he profane* ri=*sem were ameempanied. (Chan.) He mined the home if they redly wished the bill not *be delayed forte° et One pen* *press an opinion to that dint by a &let and Inenellignms vote, and not to lend themselves te • matins whose only object was to admits reel and salutary amendment of the repreeentatioa of *s es• Lord 3.IELT , rose for the purpose, aot of adverting to lie epee& ef the right hos lamest, so far an it was made he stagy to that of the he.. gentleman the member t u r ee =bal of considering the answer it gave to the speech of the boa. and t gentleman the amble fer Ayrshire. Tie algid hem r,net assumed an air of Injured ussamere, and mid lie motion of the hon. ad gallant gentlemen was away et device to g d a ty the gems of the bill. The Heal bee. liammet noopsot Hest so farm that side of the hams was ooneerned so sarendment proceeding from:: s had ham put from the ask It was Ism that two im amendments had been submitted to the of the hocum, cee by • the chains* of oommittese, who was cer taialy not, cionneeted with the party on the opposition side ef the house ; the albs. by an lion. gentleman who, in mak* it, said it was the pride of his life to be the devoted follower of the made bed r tha head of the government. Yet the right lea. bones MGM look across the table and talk of motion leteeded fetid* sad procrastination when he knew as well as any man in the house that those , who were most anxious to defeat the bill sat on the benches i immediately behind him. (Opposition cheers.) Sir E. COLEBEOOKE oonaidend that the interests of Scotland had not been fairly consulted in the redistribution of seats proposed by the bill, but when the house went into committee the Scotch members would have an opportunity of makiug an appeal to English representatives on that subject. With • view to the further advancement of the muse of reform, he thought that the beet course for him to panne was te e i oi SiL,ort to the government. • Mr. LONG hoped the house would adjourn able die the ef the English Reform Bill until the whale gamed* of redrem could be dealt with. Xi. INGRAM had beard with regret the statement of the noble lard the Tasishat tar the City o of London, that he WM. rel t° 6l. to IL, Bt. 1.1 17 61 11. e thought 'x. ng any tll i e n fr". rese from 61. would effeenaD w y destroy the value of the mm; and he would rather see the whole question peat posed until another year than that such a were** should be made. He else thought it would be moot objectionable to alter the franchise from a rental to a rating franchise. The workbag dames were hilly entitled to the provision made for them In the bill, and tf any alteration were made instead of settling the question, the measure would simply give rise to renewed seneatiou. Mr. WATLLNOTON sew no reason why legislation should be premed forward, considering the total absence of feeling throughout the country in favour of the bill. Mr. ALCOCK admitted there was great apparent apathy in the country on this subject, but he thought tW apathy was not to be attributed to any deficiency of interest in the minds of the people on the great subject of reform, but rather to the superabundance of confidence which the people bad in the pledgee and w ee of the noble lord in reference to this bill. If however the country should find that the govern ment bad turned their back upon the question, or that the House el Commas had interposed between the comely and reform, he wasocevinced that the greatest exciter,* would follow, and a dangerous amount of just indignities would be *premed. He did not believe there was any doubt ha that hones m to the propriety of a 101. franchise ; but he hoped that a 81. hemline would be adopted, because he believed it would enable tke themselves to take a more active part in the to tale the country, inasmuch as they paid as much in the ?se of ' taxes upon tea, sugar, tobacco, and malt, as was by the owners of property by the income tax. For own part he wee perfectly satisfied with this till, and was most anxious that it should be passed. Mr. C. BRUCE was disposed to think that if the govern- mut withdrew the bill, that would not in say degree teed to create that indigestion throughout the comity which the hon. gentleman who bed just eat down imagism& Ha weesure, with regard to Scotland, the people there would not go into mourning when they beard of the withdrawal of • reform bill for that country. Mr. BAXTER could not eupport the motion of his hon. friend opposite, nor could he separate that motion from the raisin policy which bad lately been pursued by the conservative petty g in their repeated attempts to interrupt liminess of the house. The great conservative party were seeking to stop the Reform Bill from being passed, but they ' had sot the smallness to come forward and attempt to do so Misdirect warmer. He did hope that if it were found that ao progress could be made this mission, there would be so aseemity for twinging in three bills, but that they would be able to deal with reform for the three kingdoms in one bill. (Hear, hear.) Mr. GEORGE said that, notwithstanding the hon. member for Montrose hsd thought proper to Impute to every conserva tive member a desire to obstruct public business, he should en deavour to state his opinion upon the subject before the house. He believed that them ought to have been one united bill, and then hon. members from all parts and sitting on both Bides could have expensed their opinions upon it. As it was intended to postpoes the bill for Ireland to another esesioe, he was entit.W te state that he thought it a very unfair ' . (Hem.) He did not believe it possible to legislate for E by itself without indirectly affecting the representation of Ireland, and he was inclined to think that it would be bettor to give England a trenches of 121. and 81., as it existed in I than to give to Ireland a 101. and a a franchise, ma w be the case if they dealt with the state of the English franchise alone. (Hear, hear.) Mr. PEASE hoped the house would take some action upon this question. He bad been for thirty years ac quainted with the working dames, and he was prepared to say from the knowledge he had of them that eves if this bill were to add 350,000 new electors to the constituencies that inspired him with no alarm whatever. (Heat, her.) The right hoe. member for H er tf or d s hi re asked what the working dome knew about Chia*, and how was it possible for them to elect members to parliament to decide on Chimes. questions. He could only my that the working classes with whom he was acquainted were capable of form * en opinion on such questions, and he had beau askedduri lig his lim:imam to 'Welds opinion of the English government in permitting the sale of opium. They call e d up o n the working classes to bear a portion of the taxation of the o, and to fight their battles abroad, aud on these grounds he thoiOt they were fully entitled to the posses non Cu the elective franchise. Their numbers had greatly ineremed ; why, therefore, should not a greater number be called in to share in the privilege of returning member. to parliament? (Haw, hear.) After the promisee which had bean held out to the working classes by successive govern manta, he thought it was greatly to be deprecated if the house were te separate without meeting their just claims. He believed the member st the working classes was onuill who would sot belt for representatives is the educated and higher ranks of moiety. He hoped, therefore, the house would not *danger its • and the confidence which the country reposed la It poetposing the consideration of this question. (Hear, bear.) Mr. STIRLING mid the quad* which the hon. gentle man who jest letdown had deemed was not the question before the house. The hon. member for Montrose (10 . U.61 his aide of the house with distracting the progress of the bill ; but, ma far as he could Judge, the obstruction came quite ea much from the °therm* (Hear, hear.) The hon. gentleman asked why the notice had been postponed so long. But the hoe. member for Montrose was to a great extent reepenaible for that, as he put • motion on the paper asserting the claim of Scotland to • greater extent of reform, and he did not know tat last Monday that his me ties had base withdrawn. (Hear, hear.) With regard to the claim of fluidised, the were four counties in that country, namely, Lanarkshire, Ayrshire, Mabee, and Perthshire, which on the ground of popul a ti on an d p r o p ertywere not ;dimantely represented. He also thought that the univenities of Scotland ought to have at least two meni• bare. (Hear, hear.) He was quite astonished to hear the Foreign Secretary stating the other night that there was no legislating this year for England and postponing 411 the following year for Ireland and Scotland. M ' S ".".' tatenterit had been well met by the right bon. geutle man (Mr. Disraeli). He did not wish to see the 150 mem• ben el haw, and Scotland forming* sort of rump perilo us's.* awl legislating for the whole country. He dui not wish to see them having to deal alone with the deficit which would exist next year, and it may be with a European war. He therefore hoped the bon. member for Ayrshire would divide the haves. (Hear, hear.) The LORD-ADVOCATE understood the argument of Sir J. Faroe* to be that there should be but one bill for the three enaateise, sad that, this being an English bill, none might to be *seed; but he thought, on the contrary, that every aloft should be used to 'pea the English bill, and if there was not time to pus the other bills this session, they weld he introduced early the next; the objections eau fagtd ap mpuut this wane were mere bugbear.. The teem eo not discuss ell the three bills in committee pert pasta, but might help the government to settle the details of the English bill, and there might then be limo to pus the other bills this maiden. Ho proceeded to defend the bill, and especially the coneasesou . made to the working dames, ridieeliog the idea that it would open the floodgates of democracy aa a delusion. Mr. WHITESIDE remarked that the question was wha ther the government, having proposed a measure co n sisting of three parts, as noritainior together • scheme of parka meat any niterm,aed letting it remain in the same position for several months, we at Warty to make two of the parte disappear. Why, he asked, had three bills been intruducod? No doubt, because it was necessary to settle the whole question and deal with the entire representation et oboe. In this the government were quite might ; but, if so, they were quite wrong in withdrawing two of the hills earl ma ceediag with aely oas. He meld understand their insisting apse pressing all the Line, or withdrawiag all sod pciele posing legislation till another time, but he could not under stand their reason for `two of the 1411. and endea vouring to squares the English bill in tlle iaouth ' of June. MMim J Xr. BRIGHT said that there couldbeveay little doubt ed. the object of this motion—namely, to get rid of lb. Mac- Idenen's amendment, which, se • piety, they ocedd net support, on the ground of its being not only Wee, bat ridi culous. The question was whether the house warn willing this year to grant any measure of reihtw required an answer. He contimied that Mr. li had not only pledged himself to • large exteselna of the fran chise, wild& should include the working thaw,',. ro t to a 101. treashies in the counties, and Sine the b ; and he regreilbed that he had been Mien by his OWell from so The • resolve. Five times the Queen 1,4 asked parliament to settle this question ; and five tabus& bad been unanimaut in opinion that it should be penal, and yet gentlemen opposite refused to accept even this moderate fie. Without waiting fee the census, it w known that the population would amount to 30 millions, and there wbuld be of them six willow of men by whom the fran chise was not enjoyed. This bill sought to admit • few of • them, and it couN not be mid that the measure wee in say sense dangerous to the constitution, for would the admir eke of we in twenty of these men be hassilag over the government of this country to poverty and ream ? He very emphatically defended the working eLases against the acensetions which had been made against them by Mr. Dimon and • writer in the Quarterly Reriew, and preduced statistical information showing the capability of that elms for elevating and improving them ' salon and their condition, and the cultivation of tragal and provident habits. He would go into no more facts, because those statements would carry conviction to every impartial mind that it was not wise or Just to indulge in such language as they had Award during late debates with rapid to the character and the condition of the unenfranchised classes in the king dom. (Hear, hear.) If these charges were true, what could ' they prove but an utter condemnation of the whole system of the governments of pest times, and if they were not true ' then they were pursuing an unwise and dangerous coarse in making them. What was the object of heegentlemen opposite in the persistent delays with which they Met that proposition? He was told—of amine hoe. gentlemen would very likely oontrsdict it—that they wanted to belle and damage the government, so that by and by they would be able to move to that side of the house—(War, hear)— and the right hon. gentlemen on the opposite benches would come and sit on the Treasury benches. He had no doubt whatever that there was considerable anxiety on this more. He had observed d when the gentlemen who now sat on the Treasury bench sat on the opposite aide. (Hear.) They were very anxious to get there, and sometimes took maw which he thought unworthy of a great party to dis lodge their opponents and take their place. (Helx) He was happy to say he never co-operated with theta in any of theseattempta. (Oh, oh.) Hon. gentlemen opposite wesid recollect that during last year, whoa they were on the ministerial aide of the house, they were continually taunted with being kept in office by his right hea. friend the imsmber for Addeo and himself. (" Hear;' sad "Oh, oh.") It WWI mid of them and of his right boa. hired and himself what seem reemliers opposite had said—hie weasorry to say foolishly --ef Vie gassent government widths= wevilbut heccould make • great deal of allowance, bemuse cm presienied trim the anxiety which every man evinced to get ca was tlibLerern meet bench that there some ha in sitting them. (Laughter.) But supposing they messed in getting there? He would mourns that the noble lord withdrew his bill, which was not very likely—(lagghter) —that they damaged the government, a nd t they could not go on any longer, and ware broken up, as many other governments before hail been broken up, that Lord Derby came beck to power, and that they were all where they were a year ado. What then ? Would that reform (Nes. Wu be settled ? Was the right hon. gentleman (Mr. Disraeli) prepared to carry out the state ments which he had made—not private statements, but etatemente made in public and which he bad not repudiated, wed probably never would repudiate ? The right ben. gentleman expressed his swat. He did not intend te regadate those sentiments, and therefore he pro if he came back to power, to add 500,001.) electors to the existing number, ad more than that, bemuse after the election he found he must do more than merely open the gen eral to the working claims, and he would admit them, as he said, with sincerity and generosity. Hon. gentlemen opposite did not calculate upon that. They thought, as he understood, that 6,000,000 would remain out if they got rid of the bill. The door would be locked and barred, and for a long time to come—nobody knew how long—the question would not reappear, and they would go on in the old humdrum fashion without regent to the wishes of that vast multitude who had so often during the last thirty years asked them in the moat humble and defe rential toner to be admitted to some portion of the power of that house. (Hear, hear.) If the bill were refused the people of this country who were most affected by its provisions would say that they had been treated with distrust, and that some hon. members had used language towards them as if they had acted in • manner to be condemned and deplored rather than applauded. The right hoe. baronet the member for Herta, in • work he pttbhshed some years ego said, " Who knows the great ness of the generosity of the people of Reeked?" and he did what he (Mr. Bright) would not do, exclude from that the nobility who were the government of the onantry. b if s ( s l e fr. Bright) said the people were generous, and that on their industry was based the wealth and greatness of the I:=./asses. He was not lees the friend of the upper than of the working classes, when he imploted them with all the power he could put into words to pass this bill, and to treat their countrymen with generosity and with jus tice. (Loudelmers.) Sir H. CAIRNS observed that tis . sqch of Mr. Bright, ro apppriate enough to the third of the bill, hail never once approached the question a issue, which well deserved the attention of the house. U the government thought proper to adopt the course of introducing • measure to amend the representation in the shape of three separate bile, they might dispose of them all in one amnion, or defer the whole to another; but the hills were se con neetod together that they could not be severed without creating serious difficulties and embamunmenta. If the house went into committee upon the English bill, they . should be sure that they had materials for dim cusauig its details. The amount et which the borough franchise had been fixed depended upon the accuracy of the data assumed by the government ; but he stated grounds upon which he charged their returns with being entirely delusive. Unless the datementa he had made could be shown to be inaccurate, the house, he said, should beware of being driven into rash and precipitate legislation which depended upon questionable data. In the meanwhile bills of extreme Importance, measures of law reform, were postponed from day to day and week to week to make way for this unfortunate production of Lent John Russell. He appealed to the house to rescue itself from its embarrassing position, and to the government at ease to withdraw the bill. Lord PALMEBB'TON °hearted that it H. Oakes had fallen into the error which ho had imputed to Mr. Bright; his speech belonged to the committee. The tardy prowess of this bill was occasioned by the delays iacemantly inter- ' posed to obstruct it by those who dared not oppose the measure openly. Did the house mean to pass a reform bill or not ? The principle of this bill had been assented to, or , why was it not opposed on thesecoud reading! The chime lions now offered to the bill went to the details, to timidness in which the fundamental principle was to be carried out. The whole of the discussions which had taken place on the bill hail been for the purpose of delay, and they had now arrived at the climax of the proceeding. He replied to the arguments founded upon the difficulties anticipated by Mir H. Oahu. from the ponponemeet of the Irish and Scotch bills to another session, and professed hie readiness to wander in the committee the objections to details, not re. t to the principle of the bill. The noble lord tioutialied r uir trrt that the house will consider on both sides the mo tion in which it stands. Is the house prepared to affirm that there shall be no reform in the representation of the people? I will not ask gentlemen on this side, to of each a principle, bemuse I know they would refuse. (Loud cheers) But will gentlemen on the other side after what happened when their lenders were in office, de• Clare that there shall be 'no change? I mise sible. (Loud cheers.) Well, H that be impossible, on what grounds can you refuse to allow the house to go into committee on the bill! (Hem.) I say that the facts and argument. which occurred when their leaders were la office compel them is consistency to go into committee ; and it is only in committee they oan establish the objections they ' have made to the details of the bill. We have told them we are reedy to consider these details, and that if their objections be not inconsistent with the principle of the measure they shall receive our best con sideration ; but there are principles fundamental to the bill, to the alteration of which we cannot consent., because such alteration must lead to the entire destructioo of the measure. One main principle of the bill is the reduction of the borough franchise ; if they were prepared to reset that reduction, let them prepare a hostile retolutioo. (Hear, hear.) Why do they not say, " We won't go into committee, and adhere to the principle of Lord Derby's bill?" Let them move to that effect ; that would be a fair, manly, and intel ligible course, but they do not, they cannot, because the right hon. gentleman the member for Backs, and others who stand high in the party have pledged themselves to a reduction of the borough franchise. Indeed, two members of the late government went so far as to resign oMce because they wished for a reduction of the borough franchise, and there. fore if they cannot, if they are not prepared to throw out the bill on principle, then I say they are taking a part un worthy of a great political party in endeavouring by delay to prevent the house going into committee on a bill the importance of which they have ad milted, the expedieney of which they have recognised, the principle of which they no longer contest, and the details of which are their only subject of objection. (Hear, bear.) I say, then, that on every principle which should guide statemen and the member of a greet political party, they are Wend to go into the 000sidotstion of the bill in corn. mines, and there to offer the objections which they sin eerely entertain. Is the tone of year such as to make such a course impossible t No doubt it might have been earlier if that fair and manly course bad bean taken which 1 think would have been becoming in a Mai political party. I say that the manly course would have been to say either that they &muted to the bill in principle, or that they objected to tile details as likely to introduce too much of the demo cratic shiniest into the constituencies, but that those were questione far the committee. They would have thus effected their legitimate object, whilst they would not have ob structed those meseuree of importance, some of which I teen we shall carry this session in spite of these unseemly daleys. (Cheers.) I do trust that the house will, by reject his this motion for adjournmeut made at four o'clock to premed discussion, show that they are determined to go on with the bill, Mal that they will nut, from any unfounded appmesouosa of two dianolutheas, or of a premature die =intim, or by_ nay Limner aiewideastions, be diverted tram th o o s Et path of public duty, but before they imit ate dime by their. tete one way or the other what is opinion of the House of Commons so to the pined* of the bal. (Loud cheers.) Mr. DIARIVILI-v.flir LoongraMiLate the noble lord on the lint speech which 'le ham made on the Reform Bill. (Lend opposition ohms) And, sir, IDa mot surprised at the remarkable 'errors which have crept 'into the noble Iced's statement - becanair I feel that he has hitherto lies )ham interest in the bill than might have i t i le ff e a aated from a minister po responsible for the cm of the measure. It is ashy bemuse the noble "lord bas not before to-night taken pat in or debates that las at all account for his total misapprehension of the beam of the house for the last three months. What is the esesplaint of the noble lord ? He does not deny that our busimes has been conducted in• meet unsatisfactory manner. The noble lord does not deny that here we are advanced to the 7th of June, and have not yet arrived at the com mittee. The noble lord seems astonished at the position in which his government is placed with respect to this measure; and then,with great precipitation and rashness, he falls to scolding the house, and talks of the delay, the uncon stitutional and irrational delay that has been experienced ; end through not being sufficiently acquainted with the con duct of this nuneure, he thinks of course that the delay boo been oecessioned entirely by the opposition . (Cheers.) Why it was only on Monday last that the government pro penult° go into committee; and now the noble lord w omb foe the little progress the measure has made by the vexations delays of which he complains, though it is the mooed, of the house that the government them selves, having had ail the days usually appropriated to in- Vwamembem entirely at their service, only last peepeseri to go into coninuttee on the bill ee thaaanduct of the house before the appointment wpm mode ? Did the opposition avail themselves of all the forms of the hutute to oppose the progress of the measure ! Pass the noble had complain that the second reading was tat opposed! Is theta signof faction? Is that a aka of delay. (Hear, hear.) • Does the noble lord complain that upon the principal rof the measure, ad =, baileys, the principle of the bill, the h ouse h se ave them that constitutional and solemn occasion to Mono v110_ • might be the application of those pried else Was • GAM* olive days so unreasonably lesef—was that opa* elf time se turesnal on such a subject, this the sato b *Mod la ton* round upon the house, bo soms the bailouts et the country has been carried cm in this unsatisfactory manner, end accusing them of delay, be muse • discussion of five or six days took place upon the second reading? But who are responsible for the length of that discussion! Is it the opposition only? (Hear. hear.) It was correctly stated that the mai°- , rity in number, and I believe in length, of the spleChal, were made by the sepporters of the noble lord. (Heir, hear.) . But now he turns round to us, and says, " There is only one question to ask—ere you in favour of Abe Reform Rill or not r' If the noble lord wants infer (station on that subject, I recommend hum to apply that Inquiry to the hon. member for the city of Edinburgh, who elle in the immediate vicinity of, and in close political con %pity and sympathy with the noble lord. Or let him inquire of the hon. member for Bristol, whether he is is favour of the government Reform Bill. (Hear, heir.) Or I should recommend the noble lord to address his in quiry to a graver mind—that of an hon. gentleman who must share his eontdence—the member for Salford ; let the noble hod uk him whether he is in favour of Tarifa , mentery reform. The noble lord might address this ques tion to a great many other gentlemen on his own side. (Hear, hear.) The speeches made against the government souraro have been more eloquent and conspicuous on the eovernmmt side of the home than on ours. We have taken more general views —(hear, hear)--and stated some large constitutional objections to the course adopted by the noble lord and his colleagues, but for minute criticism, vailaut captiousness, or a degree of devotion to the details of the measure, which appeared to be prompted almost by • sentiment of personal panic —(a laugh)—l should say that the great liberal party was more distinguished than the rutlemen on this side if the house. (Hear, hear.) Yarlimient met early, at an unusual _ period. Far a whole fortnight nothing was done. Why nes not the Reform Bill introduced! When the second reeding took place the duration of the debate was not unusual ; it was only becoming the importance of the measure. The greater portion of that debate, and the portion most opposite to the merits of the measure, came from the benches opposite, Irons the habitual supporters of the ministry. When that debate was closed the government did not propose to go into committee until Monday, the 4th of June. (Hear, hear.) I ask the house and the country, under them cir enmstanoes and in this state of affairs, is the minister fits ' esea in the assertion he has made this evening end in the tone he has adopted ? (Hear, hear.) But is this all , Look at the records of the house and examine there who are the authors of the amendments to the motion that the erstaker do leave the chair. (Opposition cheering.) Where do they sit—(renewed cheering)—and who are they who have suggested means by which the measure might be ar rested and ultimately defeated. (Cheers.) I used not return again to the hon. gentleman who gave imam of • motion for referring the Reform Bill to a select committee, the notion of which very much flattered the noble lord the member for the City. Vasa is the state of the house at the present moment? It is true that as amendment has been proposed to the motion that the Speaker leave the chair, but who makes it? Is it a con servative member, one of those who are to be made the responsible authors of these delays? The honourable gentleman who brought the subject forward this evening I believe generally sits behind the noble lord, and avowed when he made the amendment that he did it out of habitual devotion of may years to that distinguished statesman. (Cheses.) Is it to be endured that under such circum stances the noble lord, in total ignorance, I believe, of what his been going on in the house, should now charge us with obstructing the bill? (Cheers.) His conduct can only he amounted for by those rosy slumbers into which be always Adis when reform is mentioned. Suddenly awakened from his dram, the noble lord exclaims, " Cod bless me ! is this the lib of June and the Maim Bil not in committee? I'll go to Mr. Bright and I'll make a groat declaistion”—(loud laughter)—tad then the noble 100 l mines forward and talks el the factious and unconstitutional delays of the Tory party—(cheering) —while all the time his own friends are the parties removable for this conduct—(heer, hear)—and it to not until the 7th of June that the noble lord has oondeecended to uy • word— I will not say in favour of the Reform Bill, but about the Reform Bill. (Loud - Won cheers.) But let -- that we have opposition cheers.) use's what we have Ibsen doing this evening. The noble lord was equally in serer se to what ceased this evening. He was ant present at half-pest four o'clock, and I dare say he was in a gayer and more brilliant scene —(laughter and cheers)—but I should advise him to adhere to the salutary rule he has so long followed, and not venture again to speak either on the Reform Mil or on the proceedings of this house with regard to it. The noble lord has entirely misunderskaal the motion of the hon. gentleman who, in a speech of great spirit and intelligence, introduced the subject before us to-night. (Hear, hear.) Let me say one word, however, on what the noble lord has treated at some length, namely, his plea that there ought not to have been any criticism of any kind epee this important measure because the noble lord says we are all agreed upon the principle. It is difficult to know what the noble lord means by saying we are agreed to the principle. The right bon. gentleman proceeded to say that the great 'liberal party, when in oppusitieu, had reorganised them- Salves by promises of reform, by means of which they bad got Into data, and when in office nothing wee dune. This game went on for a lung time, until three prime ministers in succession had recommended her Majesty to take into consideration the reform of the repreeeatatiou. The late go 'ferment were of opinion that it would be for the public ad vantage, after all that bad occurred, to bring in a measure, Into the merits and demerits of that measure lie would net eater ; but he would tell the noble lord, as be had oom inenced this controversy, that they hail brought forward the measure of List session because they believed it to be a coo servative 1110nCIrt., and they objected to the measure of the noble lord because they believed it was not a conservative ineaotre. (('heers.) The noble lord in his speech had hardly addressed a single remark to the question at issue. The noble lord must have supposed the home was discussing the amendment of one of his own supporters. The noble lord could not suppcee after the announcement that the bills for Scotland and &laud had been dropped. that the house would not pause and ask what would be the effect of such a constitutional change. The noble lord proposed that the house should this year amend the repro sentatioo of the people. He told the house now very differently from what had been said by his eel. leagues. What was the security that next year the representation of Ireland and Scotland would be completed ? But supposing these groat events achieved, the noble lord would admit that, thanks to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the house would have text year to consider the great question of the taxation of the country, not only under circumstances of suspicion, alarm, and even danger, but in • moribund and condemned parliament. (Cheers.) He said the tory party would have been unworthy of their position if they had not taken that oppor timity of expressing their condemnation of such a course. The noble lord at the head of the government, who had jant favoured them with hie virgin speech upon the Lill, had given no satisfacto ry reply to the motion. (Hear, hear.) He had left a painful impression on the house that he haul taken up the subject rather from party necessity than from political conviction. (Hear, hear) But as the noble lord had challenged them to a division, he met him on tie grounds he (Mr. Disraeli) had stated, and he looked to the result of that division without apprehension. (Hear.) Lord J. RUSSELL said the question was whether the objections urged to proceeding with the bill were reel and substantial, or merely a pretext for getting rid of it. It was clear that if they proceeded with the Scotch and Irish bills first there would be no time left to consider the bill for England ; and be, therefore, contended that the iinly prac tical course to pursue was to take the English bill first, and leave the others to be dealt with in the next d w e as mn a e( clzpted .mi , r a d t th session. (Hear, hear.) It was said that if that course hut the government never said that parliament, under such ciroumstances, would not be perfectly capable of lees toe bi d n isc P" us 4 s ed tbe Pa Sc ri tt ni zh ent' and w" lri hi sh be b ( d i ls e. ; Whin. In 1&12 there were 150 members who did not re present the people ; and after the Reform Bill was passed in that year the House of Commons was condemned. But the present bill enlarged and stosegthened the re. presentation, and did not imply any outidenuation of the House of Commons. (Hear, bear.) if it psalmsd. there was no mama why it should not sit for another session and pass the ut her bill,. If hon. mem. hers eousiderwl the Mil a revelatiouary monsure which would destroy the constitution of the country, let them oppose it manfully on that ground but if they did not NAy that, and did not object to the admission of the working classes, their only course was to go into comm itt ee , w h ere they could decide upon the extent of Out admission. (Bear, hear.) But the party op posite would take neith er course, nor would they slake a Mink and open decimation on the subject ; but they sought by a pretext to delay awl obstruct the bill. (Cheers.) The house divided For the adjournment of the debate 248 Against it This result wee received with some cheering on the part of the oppwation. Mr. 23 COCHRANE moved the adjournment of the house. Ths home again divided— No Ayes 2*;7-45 The SPEAKER having then read Mr. Mackinnon's motion, bate.(...l.ptain GORDON moved adjournment of the ii. Viscount PALMERSTON said that the government wc ro satisfied with the division which had alr e ady t a k en pl a and which had sufficiently evinced the sense of the h0u,,.. (Cheers, and counter cheers.) He would, therefore, cur, sent to the adjournment of the debate till Monday. The debate wm accordingly postponed. THE IRISH REFORM BILL. Mr. CA.RDWELL having moved that the order for th.: second tending be discharged, Mr. • ILMN EN: Y mid he should oppose the motion. Colonel FRENCH hoped that the next Irish bill would be of a more satisfactory character. The O'DONOGHUE moved the adjournment of ti,, debate. After *OM observations from Mr. I'. O'BRIEN, Mr. ESTCOURT advised the bon. gentlemen, not to prem his amendment, which *as negatived without a division. The order for the second reading of the bill Waal dam discharged. THE SCOTCH REFORM BILL. The LORD ADVOUTR moved that the order for th, second Barre, and reading be discharged which was seconded by Mr. C. TENURE OF tAND (IRELAND) BILL. The second reading of this bill was adjourned to this (Friday) evening. Thu other orders of the day having been disposed of, the house ruse at twenty minutes past two. MARKETS. COTTON.—lavamoz., Jmni 7.—Our market continue‘ extremely Eat and irreguhr, with prices rather in favour of the buyer. The sales are 8,000 balm- including 6,850 American, at tid. Bfd.; 1,000 Surat, 30. to 411 ; Egyptian, Bd. to log.- of which 2,000 are for specula. tion and export, The week's import is 105,074 hales. OORN.—BtantrIGHAY, JUNE 7.—During the present week a good deal of rain has fallen, which has caused some animation in the trade, and some quantity of wheat leis changes) hands at advancing rates. Barley still tenamg downwards, Oats rather cheaper. In beans more doing. No demand for peas. At Wolverhampton, yesterday, there was an average supply of wheat, which found buyers slowly at an advance of ls. to 2a. per quarter. At this day's market we had a fair supply of wheat from the Linnets, which realised an improvement of about 3. per quarter foreign Is. dearer : the trade closing dull. Barley Is. and oats 6d. per quarter lower. Beans and peas in improved demand, at previous rates. Datum, JUNZ 7. —We had a fair supply of wheat, for which, at the commencement of the market, the farmers asked such high prime as to check business, but ultimately a fair clearance was made at an advance of 2s. • quarter. In barley nothing doing, and in other grain uo alteration. Wheat, best, 535. to Ma. per qr. ; middlingg , 47a. to 535.; inferior 365. to 475. Barley, 345. to 4-4 s. Oats, 22e. to 33e. Beans, 465. to 50s. Peas, 425. to 46e. Flour, fine, 445. to 475. per sack ; seconds, 395. to 42. MANCRZSTZ/L, JUllri 7.—There was a numerous attend ance at this morns market with more enquiry for wheat and Hour Lhasa of i but owing to the high pretensions of holders the business tanneeeted was nut extensive. English wheat must be quoted ls. to 2s. per quarter, and foreign 2d. to 3d. per 7011 a. dearer, than on the day ee'nuight. For flour also we raise our quotations Is. per sack, but this ad vance doer not apply to French. of which them is a large quantity offering. Oats and oatmeal confine to be quite neglected. No change in the value of beans and Indian corn. _ _ _ --- NEWBURY, JUNE 7.—Our market was this day well sup plied with wheat, which met • quick mile at an advance of from 2s. to 3a per qr. Merely • retail trade in barley. Oats fully am dear, but rather quiet. Beaus and peas dull at late rates. UXBRIDGE, Joys 7.—There is a better supply of wheat at today's market. The advance in price asked by holder* checked a ready sale, but ls. to 2s. per qr. was obtained on last week's prim. In spring corn no alteration in value. Emotion'. Jose 6.—We had in the market to-day 1,261 qrs. wheat, 156 barley, 938 rata, and 101 beans. There were sold—Wheat, 1,141 qrs. ; barley, 123 ; oat., 469 ; and beans, 64 qrs. AN compared with last week—Wheat was 2a up on top, and 11d. up on average. tiarley was same as last on top, and 7d. up on average. Oats were 3d. up on top, and same as last on average. Beans were is. down on top, and 7d. up on overage. Priam per imperial quarter : Wheat, 51.. 6d. to 60s. ; barley, Mk. to 42a. ; oats, 275. to 245. ; beans, 465. to 5111. Weight of top—Wheat 661 lbs. ; barley, 51 lbs. ; cats, 451 lbs. ; beans, 661 Its. CATTLE.—Eurnuauu, Jun 6. The supply of cattle was mall, there being 482, or 211 fewer than on this day week. Demand good, and last week's prime fully main tained. Two oxen, 2.5 months old, sold at 841. 10a—sup posed to be lls. per imperial stone. Top prim, 10s. 6d. ; current, 10s. ; middling and inferior aorta from 7s. to 84. per imperial stone. Fed pigs from 6s. 6d. to 7s !per imperial stone ; six to eight weeks old do.,from 10s. to 13e. a head. Numbers in market—Sheep, 3,967; fatcattle,o2; lean do., 679; milcheows,9oo; pigs, Z 7. The supply of sheep and lambs this morning w.ei 3,0 a, being 178 more than last week ; 766 of the above were ewes and lambs and grazing hoggs. Prices much the same as those obtained last market. Aged sheep in the wool from 10d. to MI. ; clipped, from Rd. to M. per lb. Lambe, top prices, 30e., 31a., to 325. ; current, from 275. to 28a. ; in ferior from 13e. to 115 e. a head. . SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. Aralancbe :ship , , from London for Zanzibar, Feb. 28, on the Line, lon. 115 W. Buosphabui Ishlw, from Liverpool for Australia, Feb. 13, lot. li N., ion. le W. Empress ,shipl, from the Tyne for Hong Kong, March 13, let. SI R., 1/111. Illativorth (British banme, from Port Louis for London 41 days, May 1, let. 12.24 8.,10n. tr. 44 W. Haw & Beek barque), from Colombo, March 2& Irene (British brig , from London for Port Natal 78 days, April la, lat. SI.ASIL. lan. H. 30 E. Joint ilasterman (ship', from London for Algoa Bay, May 1. Kob.i.nour ,barase , , for Mauritius, April 17. Marys, from Akyab for Liverpool. March S. lat. 11N., lon. 88 E. Norden Mwedish barque', from London fur Adelaide, March 9, let 220., lon. . Orwell ship from Plymouth for Port Philip, March 6, lot. 16 8., lon. 3.; Penis.) Speedy Pettish ship), from Bombay for Loudon, troops on board, 75 .lays, April 30, lat. 14.21 8., lou. 8.1 W. Startled Yawn British ship), from Calcutta for London, troupe on board, Aitil 30, lat. 14.21 S., lon. 8,1 W. Tomo. from udun for Seimpatau), Feb. 7, on the Line, don. Id W. EPrefi HOMCMPATITIO Cocoa.—ltS delicious aroma. grateful eroadlinees, and Invigorating puwer have pro. cured its general adoption as a lweakfast beveraim. i lb., IL., and 1 lb. packets, at le 4..1. per lb., by the principal grocxrd. Labelled "Junes Epp, Homoeopathic Omelet, Londun."— Advertiaement. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. BARNES —June 4. at Roxburgh VII* Fitockwell.parkeoad, Mr. it lt.trnee, of • daughter. CAMPBELL.—June 4. at Gidlands, Gloucestershire, the wits of the Rev. W. P. A. CsaspbaLl, of a ditagitter. CH APNIAN.—June 5, at Aldershott, the wife of Lieutenant- Colonel Chapman. tad bat allow 18th Royal Irish. of a daughter. CUIFFNZY.—Jutie 3, at Royal.erewmut, Notting hill, the w ife of W. M. Chlffney, Req.. of a daughter. COOTIE. — Jane 3. at Berkeley-square, the wife of W. W. Cooper. 11.; 41 T i t ~ a daughter. KEN Y.—Juue 4. at Vpper Leetenatreet, Dublin, the wife of Mr. A. D. Kenuedy, of a ono. PLIIIIIIL—June 0. at Winehecenb, Oleueesterahlre, the wife of H. Plumbe, Kry., of awn. MARRIAGES. ...... A HAI R—TII RNBULL.--Jwie 5, at the perish church. Pinner. by SIC Bev. T. Burrow, M.A., A. W. Adair, EN., Captain 52nd Light Infantry, to Caroline Maria, daughter of J. 0. Turn bull. Boy. ARNOTT—DANCL—June 5, at Bt. Mary's, Bryanstonaquare. by the Von. Archdeacon Grant, the Rev. O. Anoott. Vicar of Coat. hum, to t'arollne, daughter of the late Colonel Sir C. Duce. of Herr House, Taunton. BARBS—WILLOCK.—June 5. at Walcot Church. by the Rev. T. Coombe, M.A., the Rev. V. W. Baker. M.A., Incumbent of Beaulieu, New Voted. Manta to Charlotte Frances, daughter of„MaJor G. Willock, .L.N., of Liundown-cresceut, Bath. DEATHS. ANBTIB.—J tine 4, at liatWrti,l3,niwall, B. Mist* 2i.q, aged tg. CIIAMBRILe —June 4, at the Manor House, Great Durafoni, Captain W. W. Chambers, It N , aKrd 50. CtiLßY.—June 3, at Greenwich, Mary, wife of Commander Colby, aged OA ELLIGT.—ApriI OD, at Mathes, Cornet Riveradale MM. King's Dragoon Guards, third son of John Lettsoni Elliot, Req., of Pimlico. 'MN Y Nit—Jutie 4, at Upper ftwainsitlck, Bath, Jane, wife of the Rev. L. leaps, aged 43. LAWTOIO.--Juse S. Jane, wife of Mr. J. M. Lawton, of John son-street, Olise6lism-hlll, Manchester. LLoya —Juno 4, at Barham, Kent. E. Lloyd, Rey.. aged 86. BIMPSON.--Jsma Junes Alexander Sinipen, F,ey, of Ilon• tegue- a res, Messalleimere, and Moorgateetreet, Loudon, in the yaw at Ws ago. Primal sad ishilikat by WILUAN W Mk S. lasobewi al I M. I R the City d Landes. Misr W O S" iathemik . We Yreclod MIA% icss s. 1