The Express. — London, England, 1861-09-26 00:00:00

I, N EWSPAPER --- 1 . • --- re.4.- .., • ' trirl3 rt Ili % 0 . ~....Z . q , .g . 4 Z 4 ( . 7 f lirk p . ? s 1 1 SSNSIX3 _ t (Stamped, ld. Additional.) No. 4,719.] LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 26, 1861. r a M u ' %Tr (f . 1 roigrrzea s Armic A BLLbylAjtrriuti.4l. .Ikoit F.. 111.1.1114 WWI Part Philip. land ihr , at hie Great loos, tri, ineetreet, ttrveat.gordea. TO! . it. t • oesda3 net °Kober, 1,11111,: rtinniedi 1110111 WW Yritlay .114 t 7. at hell pot it Pftderb• V0n :40% .111 !Mei -Alp soarsout. Lawu lea mbar,. J. S. lib of ricellent Si leitattei WIC MIJECIN. the rty or the , o.ed. . Wirt la the art Durk& Tab Ye Corot Alfred de Limn. aria.. two goof nacopre, the. p 1.0. g W.... Mg../ Willson awl %on' celehrohed Vein! Vase. phologrophit ..pp.tretet. electrical lamp, magic • .1 pe Lrt., •h..h ^turbos be illeknolk. bock Ka* hobos slide., and a variety mix ciboria, stick..—Lay be .tie Inie lint. a. tancabehire. rid Oho bet. bewails, I Owed today and g0..., r0w, and e.tattopm e had. ti Ail., ...Ultima Otto d ftrallal far the poolooper „ r.• at. 11. r togaisaistiatt as an &flamers d prowa. .., ‘ion Or will carry ea 'tyrant...l Novato. 1•1.41 j• apply to M*l.llllD. A U.Pthitt to 4 * alit Marro Mfrs mod Mir. Mt, baba. rl doo - reran r• by MO bra of packets are rmarrod o.titmrt.e. to Oman* bold= bit arecod.clane tam, • toe h.e UfrJahre boa SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. [TWOPENCE RICHMOND RACES. -MEDNiSDAY. THE RUGBY ROMANCE. COMMITTAL OF THE PRISONER. (nom on own, uporrza.) covered the box I recovered the child from Mrs. Andrews, via., 13th June. The child is the same that has been pro duced in court. Croseexamined—l was employed by Mr. Cooke. I dap% know for whom. The prisoner professed to give me some information with a view to trace the child, and to• certain extent he did so. .Some of his information wee correct, some of it incorrect. I pursued my investigation partly on that information. RUG BY, WEDNESDAY. iirffIiti .o Ir aK S I TILiIi n. ONIMIINIIIIIZION to t4.1.1111A MAN YIP WIIPLIT Wised d= ravelled WO *erre elsonbeldpsa . lll7 ell essensnown issmoders and dispolebre, LY .W LI,IIIIFOOL POI mai yam MA". able. Wednesday. Oeisbur ETNA. Weeloseday, tirearees And every sesosedise Woinsiw. .Mn..ossene U. 17. 'mitt pia-se. asset dins begs, asson• • •!ateat Yerewl proem II punens. incleding all proelelows 1 . 4.1. Powwow. kr erode sad ties Weetern AnSW board e t Nib .0 wr7 M.h.M1111.6111111 terest —Tor forgoer poellenies 0 4 VI I Wall INMAN. tt. Waieretreet, Liverpool or to y, % rd WACILT el. Kias William street. Mr. RUTTERDAx mad the RHIN E. —Sea Paesage Moe MOO" "sly. —The !Ira. ftearahnst row or, waiWahretal owl,. awl bwourlt• parenter peddle deviser 11,1,:\ ILL W. Ali Ir H. Colomeaaarr. 111 1r devatched from t. lelllW aid V•hbr. .4.-to. 4 bail ovary Atlfl.lolll antrum& a$ • el. 8 preeleelt the prow It Is ts.wre, awl r- W 4I 41... 4.1% e..ry Tuesday Onsaalseat the belli•011. A. MIN stess...- I. h to this t' ,say the "Wet v.teleeasarest.e4 wee. oh* yew al zetteetee• eee rp v. at to Sas WNW WORM FY It!iostall . hs I ...ow, Tbaralay massala ady tres• tha rotieralag We. a...tiepin war= asteralast —roe • Al for prase. *poly si Omits Retreat . s.. reilLurm GUM. sly Fit ai nfla. 11. e▪ l Wee. Fesehar. stmt. KC. HEAT •KTIIII2II LONDON QUM T T I.L V. se • .essy WS* welds sirs sirs if WIS% -.iv* by errs, Is Si wirisi, is roll try rest an drew bo tle resersesel gyund. ssed Mumma re. te•l sub sereMy rid asessew. mow wiplablessappeessi or es. wiry et _ _ memo larniesla. N.. I SO )11. ON. N.. •NN 101.1••• of *mil& ) a► wink ear .• err). posorided j . •• • 31.ou=la 111. 11). r.w.graly • 4.1.1 Om week ...mar 47 Ter stay Arm/ al& IS obese& lidormr.l thenla I • ditto dale & S WWI 1 .11•••• W ive Whom 11.0•46. so WNW We Oar. me he oldie& al Ike Mum Ilk Nigh Warm W.C. TN! ST. PANORA' IRON WORK L COLPAINT. MD druires ST. PAJOCSAMIOA s D. Tareesses sod Illmi Tabs* W “.• bee aimbb MIN% Omni Ns. Irak Tainwlrs MON heout Car Nor b i nian eras. Onsweelisks. AT kw Weil. tlirsTlUngh CATALAN/11l PM law elemeses awl Railway.— Cl a y isnat IT rid lIINIBIASO COAL MUM . 11.0411111 e. 44 MAIM. re MUTE Lynam. LILA mit ce,:s NNl.e brikossaiel 1 1 W tee 4s bees rusk Ones Iran Ile awesemeasese. II Ilk pa Nerayeed. SW; bee suet 11e. Italesh—* Laws elleenek tik 4411 114 ; art Ea see Mir. . to ea.—ess ►re pre leselsa. ell sedan died O a = =re emir elifeme. LtAS STOYSS, OAS RAM, OAS COOL i.s 1•44 APPAIAT rs. wirossisd Or bug le likesig, si no ttingill. OW rridftill braustar mai serreadirer. awl Me 1.1 ips. NOM sr. , Alk Ilaw4llll, lambs/. I. PATIN? IMIETTATta r4I. 4IIIIII6UIIIII. Or sad Wm "we, ONO& lamp.. Mimi ilillimike Parable t. . Mr sliher or we tat boa Tube awl bed I Imo% Mom .4 hot wier.llla. ildr. THE GUMMI= OLLIIIT J pa. per dome a owls, ?a 111. derspailLa we Mob Mir les W. L $ s gm" Ws IL pleb; issoskialtriamilibarl. .i.eme nil al WA; ; ell misled PM, MB I eis. swan via.; be leek ell Mmil eerie Silistiey. Ile. per ; mess pmmee aid iemdi Ikerily. lees la Me pw smile ; Mt Lee des O. lie We pot melles. saiL-4AXII MISOLIAX. lie. 4 firsealwel. LW. OTIVINS awl 80/Vllis• awl Mirchnuta. 1 MIMS id comMit did i amok 1111 L. IS.: dill.. paii. sr.. pm =De • Hier+, per palm . s. par dm lilt RV M : Old /Arnim ta i 41.. I.la . p4s4 th maim. MUNK Y few N. NOWA WA, IIOL . I.IIIL pird li em 14140L1M1 ON, la IC M. M. : 141•44444 And Owl amid. ISL. 14e. 4d. r. ,., :t a. marrow 11116XD1r. sr Weds. ilk per plod. stall k Vdrup lids of wire sad mite es sorb di4s. Owe &Wen .1 main IM nib bus al itspres.-74. ta1...444-44reet 111114144. UATIUMBTON and DROGDENS GOLD cause If !sof voted. is remasabi• war rd w lung* •uu mooloatamis' pieta nu gaid sibe AEON gootooloo4 sod roloraloold at Us. prise aisrapad las sato. Mmob soar dots water. to lawistu The Ilmoomo d Ike /441, sod drop be Wks." Ibmislactory.Nw 14 ilaniailaaboak Cipanagordia. W.C.. Raba Amp as& at duds' sail jorratiary tar Is. auk b. Tie aitaaltalialwat dean M 41 la $s maks aaa as lauraga al I Wean*. r2CELEBRATED " INDISPENSABLE 1110117 le as Inaineme variety of puttorm sad Mixtures w %Meg MIN& TnivrIUDIR. or Buoloem. from aft so 70a, rallitield meemespodosl to Th eresa s.d Wacureosdoeu sad i to dammed, at Z. WORMS sad RON. liaterllADO awl SIMMS Z TAI LORA, HATTrltit, 110 4 TERA, awns. BOUTMAKKIIa, sad OESEIAL 017111Trilte Oirser iiiiimairFoissd ilasala Nee Oderdrimi. mom a llezt-ainst Cower d Tullesksweart-ruml sod limatiewerl. lbeilleld ark lksonerd. Tee Libby. N.B. A. Imareas asA Asks ....,hest d envie for Yawowar awl ups. Ye lie several obeys urrotioord brooches o rat h 14111 VIAL sum —11 o• lOTA BLINIIIINVIN will b. CIA *MD ISM MY owl ruAltikartW, &DO reroprood fur loialur.• se srl se wept. ) r‘rslelt IMO" Wt. R. MIDI' (ALFRED "MB)) L NNW Al WV AIID 111117111 MCA lot Lb. !.Alen/ Lift* ANGOLA Ida 11111001.14 n:ats, rigArle waft kr g ?mums we mod n 4611.1.8_191=r1" al oft Wane IsTL szooarrsat umgovn.apvAitz I 'be Y nit samested ow penes initatian Aar 'Aver. Wog bib ems. IITABLUIRLD Lab INASUARY. LIML i siasts popari. —of "" ta t i tare.l7ins a".. .twasf e "- Ir.— IL ft. L S. omint in" b . */ she web..4S no he loft Imp II km_ weft. et Os osse I " yea+ be Ms • loollowid O. emehals• malalks. PiCTACLES, improved by HARRIS awl will eieet ••ertainiy the Med. Bette: earned we de Short. with rryNsls or pebhiee Ifa : ideal. with ' Yto lee. Gold ood Silver eperetacles sod Y.yeAllimes Vest variety, al low prime Marred. Yompeet mem • , 4 .1 poet Res . 1111•4. II Atkin see RON. Optkiess to the Fully. 'molts the Mika Memo Ibleu loodum dished liw. l statin. —NO trivellen employed. I LA DIES.— lt4 MLA 111 KALTDOR, an Preparellnua Isapecrefas ead . the enpieu., s..leldis. The mint Mem le —. 1..44 the •••••••• and delimp basso aeul ems, lie au:t matklag Magi& sad of .• •11 mho" me. M Meelfte Alenbee- ., I ..thaft ablessam Mkt • Ntilper• hie to 111 after Oa eYeli.bwtheskin. • r gala eelleneee M ail awl Ittakmasy. et Ware N. Pnre ew ei eal tie Si bell•—tbid all Ilk Lo ; owl by &mils sad usebarea Ai Orr • L....hr kabdor.- era boom ei sewing ash peeelelms • seder dr row of •• OIL RICORD'S ESSENCE of LITZ meow immarei le the meg eintlered neketleatione is Mere le lenneelble. le. Oen. en perninest neediellow eti ties --.11.111 eseek Int le full netnuntons. hr mM effreher. carefully Nlisuallim••• •Impe.-111•1• swum tquArt isb. Nem* was Tomple•bee. I I BRIGHT'S APHRODIRON. —The Plice- pb•pmd ‘llllll NI TOSIC.—The •••/ 0111111k1111 Comb- rbefebeekt Wee, Iniu As.. adepeal tee bee ...awoke la. •••selseuts ofly ••••• ••• wee u selolasea—Onserbeemblesi eat her 5.4 /he al hourmils mat* tel Ms p•••.• mac IlleiNift• sod lemmearA " 1/ "`• Preormve Ms Ogelledft popershe. andke herarl possamile mew •N vie miler Neu "" *NUMMI at ma ammee womeriar Mew. gem.* •Nerare el the Iddliledder, all ulluary do- ; ••• mry other eilhemehe dettnieliteett of the gem" 4 . ~r ee neerieeres Me ea dr Impareaut abersee of nsm. oh. pot ••111•. wit Inortlabunk• I•amilla. • . 44 . 04 2•Arthop• i WIN% fi.aorlegal If Pen whet lb.. hum doet•••••. ant t• Z 7 FM 4 as • • ' 0 . 14 14 .1 p. 4.111•• ailmr.—heitsul may , ::). BTAT:r. . 4 4 7.1 . • . • Norman lielletele end Owe. Hl* " ghtelisithserphy. dteitOlhp Meredleiell leMetteUee " 14 N• !web Al•e•weeerA art werirreir lemerr. Mums iMmelkiem. AS *Opp b • a". of !b.. !Wham. s• ••••••• bum mem "PEACE, be STILL," and "TOO LATE, TOO LATE. Two Songs By Mee M. WIDSAT Wm J. Wardnagsas Slim London Robert Corks awl Co —"Mho IL Usatars array! sonus have been too lona hooter' and too Weft ippleglesei 1.. moire any encomium .t this time The twa Mil sifted shove are worthy of the popular mune they Mar mann the Ink-page • 100 late, too late,' Is full of the deep mused feeling which Am mule the &albumsa so inmeral a remount. • Prank he Is a beautiful marr.l cantata in • mall form. awl Is Invaluable for families and schools where sacred mn.ie I. lit request. - - Tide the L rks: baser& Cocteau/ Co., Sew buthagtonatreet. Ilsesed LIM*. prise la., er pot tree be U AGUIDE tu INDIAN INvErsnllirrs. ay • Nancimma Nam Wl* as hilrodection, rapablus the belleurres at lefts theamolowL Wilma amt C. , P1141111011411P40W. REDUCTION in PRICE of THE AMl3l.—Sbe Proprietors. taking advantage d the Ale Mks ad the Papaw Only. dove resolved OM es mud alter the lilt el October. the liteembell be IUIDVOID TO TIBILILIPICieb. MAP of the GREAT WESTERN RAIL SAT.—With tie DISPATCIII of hp& s so be pew W ?HIND DIVISION of the MGT WISTILIS IL ig rltfA i rtaf, arilseating the come t, os *lntel to Meter se mums. with lo Israierhca. The prier of the Dispatch ie Id.. etemped, to go free I; trsit,*l Au Edition he publish r i =e mei theorist dietaat ports d lisoload Aritawdsy Ibi, fleet street, Loodua. F RASER'S MAGAZ IN E fur OCTOBER. Prier ts. o , llTAlib : Irtilltarlmam. By John Stuart MI. reel I. DIMS limoser. A Tele. My the Miller el "Ow Mins- Ohne." "Ward ried gown." Ac. euglmes IV. hod V. Onherhinit Reg& el whir More moth km bees Nark. ly A. WeehK. R. R lag Name Nees at the Test. Oued h.r Nelq: to. All th , wm Ka. My tie Ahem at XXX 10/TIIL—X 'The luterpreher," Re. Cbehist. TM ranato quisaisa hemeatheg end ahem. Modernry. Arable. ARAMs hl Lead= Auk And I.4•Ars. West strand, W C. BALI OP ADIOWSON. Yesterday, at the Auction Mark Mr. Hewitt aid the perpetual adeowom and O&M of presentation to the of Hantrtimosus. io the misty of Sussex. The atlnia.oe of bidders was not ve SlllMerous. An seedieg to the pirileskre on the of sale, the rectory of Harelinessege is oast de.intdy situate on the most, four lase &ea the market wwn of Hailaham, and Irian gay &kiss of was! wateriog-plaess The per• mop sr degaidied go Agatha a moat enjoyable rani doge, esessi esterin and beautiful sea aad land neva, and by shoat ino scrum of glebe. The est soma sake of the living was estimated at „Irrif., and Oho ago of the incumbent slated as di : the population, I,Sua The esteditiots of yak stated that one of the title-deeds was lost, bat that a statutory deekistioo would be fissiehed by a solicitor, together with certified attracts Ines the titian of the bishop of Chick:der. Mr. Hewitt said that the title wee eacellent, and bad been theagghly laweetigated„ and the opportunity was altogether ono seldom offered. Nagy persons who had naiad the neer of lierstmosusua Castle thought it mane smian to sash& the locality any further; bat no ose who bed eel sees the parentis, e could have any idea of the beauty of ths eilsatiog. He had, if anything, andristated tin ism% whisk lifter allowing for entice and the Woof the genet Yerusbeet, ought to realise 14,10.11. at the m esa oak. There was no extra duty, ail no [cynical., fur. the, thee wee stolid is the particulars. NOON. was thes offend, and the biddiap gradually rest I. 7 WO& - fir. ilawitt —That ia just half the money it ought to filth. I pave 10,50tri. for it for the pram' owner, +object to • mach younger life. It is • very modertits population. The tedipthso ram I. 7,100 f. sad 7,2110/. Mr. Hewitt—Gasstkosia I know you will regret the np p.rtusity. Aye Wier MOW& is dirt chomp. AI? par cent, it is worth 11,001 X, and here I am wiling it at sonwithing like for 10 par ant., after all deductions. Eventually the property was knocked down to • put- Atom at 7,300 i. HEENAN AND THE CHAMPIONSHIP OP ENGLAND. The following correspondence has just heel m eshed from Ames "Mr. C. H months ago I wrote to ask you how you wisY.d me to pay the 45/. which warn sub mitted by utyssif sad hien& in testimony of your pliant behaviour Is the fight with Sayer', but having received no mower I promos the I.U/a boa never reached you. The I editor of Belle Life hi. told we that if I sent you a cheque on my banker it would he available, but I thought it adviedde to await a reply from you ; so, if you will be good enough to inform roe when you wish the mosey best, and whether a cheque fomented to you will be °messiest, I shall be obliged —1 am, yours faithfully, " Coulon, Aug. 15.• "F. H. BATHURAT. The following is the reply of the American champion to tho above : " Washington, Sept. 4. " Lieutenant-Coloael F. N. Bathurst.—Mbar —Mr. who is in tin city, has just handed me your note of the 15th August, which boa best forwarded through hie 060111, sad I desire to present you my very worm and ear nest thanks for the kind manner in which you have recol lected me. I had quite forgotten the matter of the 41f., and, is fact, it was my own fault I did sot get it +bee I was ia England, for I never applied for IL But though I need it lees now than I did then, I ilk, sot think it would be wain properly in return for the hind feeling which it news were I to refuse the wishes of yourself sad friends. I, therefore, accept the reserve' of your offer, with many Shwas, and with a full appreciation of the go od will it con veys. But your letter is most gratifying to me as an ra d the seatintent of English gettlewees is relation s it Liaberough light, in entreat with the declarations of the miens, sad those whose sentiments sad interests he represented " I believe now that the majority of the English public would (like yourself and all the true gentlemen of England) be glad to as me have fair play if I were to fight again is Ragland. At any rate Ism willing to try it ; and if Mace, er anyone else in Ragland, feels inclined to take up my last itheillage f or 2,0001. • aid., I will leave in England the 45/. ins desire to mud ma, is order that it may be used as a first &pelt towasio the match. Ido net, el asses expect a gentleman of your pad- Mis enmesh the mere fact of your kindness in wishin g to head MO MEI et mosey) to take soy direct cognisance of my • bet if Mace. of anyone else, should have ps impreinsid as latentiou to meet me for that amount, us the terms I lave peopueed, you will, perhaps, not con sider it improper et me to ask you to hand the 45/. to some person who will leave it with Owen Swift, whom I suggest as temporary stakeholder in the mutter. If, however, there has been ado such expresion on the part of Mace o r others, aid the rerun is sot eatiseactory to you, please seed me the amount to the nape of a draft drawn is my favour on any hasking.houm is New York. •• Requesting that you will present to the gentlemen who I lave so kindly joined you in this testimonial so usurers* of my earnest Osaka sad yen' great respect, I am, most is ; sorely and gratefully years, "J. C. Ensue." MON!Y Orman Orricre.—Notice has been given by the Post Ofßoe ' , lethargies, that cm Um bit of October the following alteration will be mods. eta :-1. Naglaud— Mosey order totbee• will hs opened is Landow asd the suburbs at Adeliodoroad, Hampstead, N.W. • Breakneck place, Carodes•tows, N.W. ; Cormaseciiel-pad, Peckham, a. E. ; Dorros-terraoe, Hammersmith, W. ; Lacklien.h. a . Clapham. B. ; Ledhurprood, Nottinghill, W. ; Liveisool. road, Mingles, N. ; Lower Queen street, Rotherluths, R ; Newnigtos Causeway, ft. E. ; Waltham Abbey, N. West Weed, W.C. ; Wuod Green , Totteubein, N. ; st d is the country at Beal, Northumberland, Railway Bah office ; Boamoor, Hortfoirdshire, Henielhemsetired • Bode, Corm'', Railway Bab-odire ; Cottin hani, Yr:Ashby, HsU ; Drersott, Derbyshire, Derby': Warwick. Airs, Bionditighom ; fortes, Haat., Comport; Hiein e p. Immure. wipe ; Leedom-street (heading), Berke, Itabilag ; lamtgamball, Willa, Andover ; Lympahme, Dawn, Luise ; Vezborough. Yorkshire, Rotherham ; Wabash Norldiemptonshire. Noethampion ; llytholmroyd, Yoriaddro, Manclestor ; Oast, Yorkshire, Wakefield ; Rowle It Staffordshire, Dudley ; Ruebolate, Lases. shim Yleeisstsr • Batley. Warwickshire. Bran ; Smethurst, Berke, Rsadhig ; Ratios Bridge, Canis. dire. Wishes& ; Tortes. lamsairko. Lilac ; t Dorbyskire. ebeelleerlehl Wialkas, Boats, Ferrharn„ iseilamil— Maw Oedar Misr wall be spored at Van ua* larssatabkat Lawark ; Lostarll. Imarkailirs, sae; Want Zara% Ayrshire, Oaessark. 3. Ireland.— New Order Olases will be easing at Daniaakill, Queries Nasty, Ablaryisiz • Ballyama, Cork County, ameba ; ittlai. DENO Oranty. Rica.. ; Craw, Galway Comity, Itasseamm ; Olessemillf, Cork Comity, Bantry ; Pomp &at. Waterford Omusty, Waterford . foosal Itrittp, Antrim Coasty, DaNtat. Cum* TO ANZIO:A.—no Liverpool, Phila iidgllls. sad Yaw York Stasenship Coessasy's screw steamer •21....Imideigtoo, which smiled from Livorrool yeetestlav task sat RIO Wes at tattoo. lima is as Ur ' Zit= a Lop ha at mates has bas bales la Limped ha no L AiaariaL Ter Burros HANDICAP of 7 son. each, with 50 added. Ose mile and a half. Mr. l'Asson's Vatter Ow, 3 yrs lie 10Ib 611, Mr. Millionaire 4 yrs, Tut 100. Mr. Z. Wright', l - Dpertiasid, 4 yn, Mt 4111 . WitluilT STAKE* of 5 sow. each, with 50 added. for 2.yr-olds ; cone, list 1016 ; fillies, fist 7110. Grey Mow in. Mr. Oshome's Zetiand Nib extra Lord Zethuas Herelor Mr. Dune uod's lia)llower Tel HILI,AT NtatisENT HANDICAP of 3 WT., each with 70 added, for 2-yr-olds. Grey stone in. Mr. King's Brahmin. tat 21b Mr. ilsiounie's K log of Kars, ist 71b Lard lltawilltastia Vanguard, Ist Ulto Eighteen ma. Hot MaJaarr's PLATE of 100 guineas ; 3-yr.olda. B.t 41b ; four. Vet nb ; Ave, lOat ; ail and aged, ltlat Ilb. Three Mr. rAnmies Caner Oa, II pm Walked over. The ZETL.UID PLATE Of 50 as,.. for all ages. Half.a. mile. (ntraight nub is.) Mr. Jackson's Lougebet, 3 yrs. OM 121 ii 1 Mr. Harrison's Pouthnilnetur, I yrs, at Kr. Oill,ys Adventurer, 2/ra, Mit Tea Tan. VIZ 1411.1.1 NU HANDICAP. Irks _ Lnftstaing Dors LEICYSTER RACES. -WEDS V4IOA Y. Tim Louis' HANDICAP PLAIN of 30 Soya., &Med to a Ihrespotakee of 5 loss. each, for all ages ; winners after Sept. 19, 71b extra ; the winner to be sold for 40/. To start at the Stand, and go once round. Mr. 3ston'e Little Dick, by tthelbert, 4 yrs. 74 Lb 1 Mr. S. Jaeolte's Bookaloces. mu, let M Mb lidile ltoper y) 2) t Betting :6to 4 oa Bookskioni. A dead boat. Deciding boat : 6 to 4 oci Little Dick, who won by 20 lengths. THE LEICCITERAHIBE HANDICAP of 100 soya., added to • Sweepstakes of 10 sore. each ; winners extra. Ose mile and a half. (25 subs., 11 pay 3 soya. each forfeit.) Mr. S. Jacobie Dorking, by.Neiteliam, 3 yrs, 04 Mb Ilr.Ver, Mr. T. Sterenise by laraleatcher—SOuri drop, 3 yr5,64131b (Poinae Betting : 6to 4 re Dorking,. Dorking made all ) the mooing, sad woo by Xi lengths. Cha taking his preliminary canter, Dorkiag slipped up and threw kis rider. TXx 1311ADuATI PARK STAKES of 10 son. each, with 50 added by the Earl of Stamford sod Warrington, for :i olds ; colts, Bat 10lb ; fillies, flat 71b ; winners extra ; m aiden allowances. T. Y.C. (balf-suile). )Ir. F. Thomas's The Tutor, by Dr. O'Toole, Mt bib (1 Snowden! 1 Mr. Dapan'a Peahen. Mt 7th Tortolae) I Lord Stamford 4 Iflackcock, hat 31b Inc. Tlb vane (A. Ihlnards, 3 )Ir. to Nelson's Summer Breese, eat Lb Slldglep Betting : 6 to 4 on Blackeoek, 3 to 1 apt Summer Breese, 5 to 1 each apt The Tutor sad Peahen. The Tutor nude play, with Blackeock second, the other two side by aide. Ih coming shag the straight Blackeock made him effort to reach The Tutor, but failed and Edward', suing the favourite opposite the Stand, Peahen passed him , as curios the second place and saving her 'stake, The Tutor besting her by a length and a-half ; a head between the second and third ; Summer Breeze finished a bad fourth. A PLATE of soya., G given by the Earl of Stiunford and 25 by the Race Committal, added to a sweerwtahes of nova. each, for all ages ; mares and geldings allowed 311 m. One mile. Mr. Yrllur's &shone, by Rochester, 2 yrs, est 61b O. Reeves) 1 Mr. ROLA'. Foretop, 4 yrs, Ott Mb Sir. Nekosit Viscometer., 2 yrs, est 21h Betting: 5 to 2an %shone, 7 to 2 agst Viscouutess, and 10 to 1. apt Foretop. Vi count.. held a alight lead until ',minim the tollgate turn, were she bolted down by the side of the fence oat of the wine sod was pulled up. Bes bores theta came co, sad wen moil; by • length arid a half. _ Tim Vow= Coe *Alta, by stbecriptioe of 10 mom emelt, with Wadded by the Race Committee, for :1-yr•olcte aid upwards ; mares tied geldings allowed :41b. The winner to be mold for SITU(. if &matte& Twice round and a dia tom S. Iscoten Dorking, by Newham, 3 yi?. Tit .214 thael 1 Mr Mellish's Osyksd. 4 yrs, got 51b (A. &leards, Mr. A Jambes The DOll, 4 yfe MA Mb a. Joh.) Betting : 6to ma Gsyled. 2to 1 apt Durking. Mr. S. Jacobs declared to win with Dorking. The Don led until reascliag the top torn the last time, when Dorking slipped the pair, and cams into the straight a dozen lengths in front, and was never caught, winning easily by six lengths; had third. The racing will commas this day at 1.30 p.m. WALSALL RACES.-WiDNIMDAY. THe TRIAL EITAKES of 3 sus. each, with 20 added, for all ages ; optional selling weights. the mile. (13 subs.) Mr. B. Land's Bayard. 3 yrs, Tst 12th 50t. (oat ) 1 lfr. Bate a Rajah Unmake, 4 yrs. Bst 71h White. 2 Mr. Cu',. Meld of Pent, 3 yrs, Tat 911. 50L , ... Prost) 3 Mr. Wood's (ssaperolonnt, 3 yes, , a rt ,301.) Taylor) to Is the first attempt the lot fell into a ditch at the railway turn, and the stewards decided it was no race. At the wood attempt %mord won by a length, two lengths between the second and third. Campenlown bolted. Tut Tow r 4 PLATE of 3 son. each, 1 ft, with 20 added ; winners extra ; the winner to be sold for 40 son. Three. quarters of a mile. Mr. Price's floldertyke, 3 yrs, est 1011) 'Thrmes) 1 Mr. Wood's Valt7 K weir. l yrs, Sit Tlh. Tayfor) 2 Mr. Rates's Cumberland. 4 yes, eat tom ,oi Mr. Johnson's Nemo gelding, 4 yrs, Mr. B. Land's Bayard, 3 yn, est Tlb ' , Beesley) 0 Mr. Adklns's Minima, 2 yrs, Sat 121 b (Whiteley) 0 Betting : Even oo Cuuiberlarsd, 5 to 2 each agit Doritt• and floWersyke. Woo in a cuter by three lengths ; two leng thorits between the second aod third ; a good fourth. Dta and Bayard bolted, and did not pus the post. • TIIR TRADESMEN'S FLAIL of 100 wen, added to a Han& .nip Sweepstakes of 5 suns. each, 2 ft to the fund ; winners extra. Os. roil, and a half. MS sue.) Air. T Rust's Bradfield, 4 yrs. est Mb Maass) Mr. WriEbt's Twinkle, 3 yes, Mt Mb Mr. Wall Yorkshire Gr.), aged, 74 71h .O. /east) Mr. Prier's Greenwich Fair. c yrs. 74 Tlb .... l l4Glawn Mr. Wallow's Diadem, 4 yrs. est 121 b fWbiterly) Mr. Wood's Calabar]. I )n. bet 7Th IE Taylor) Betting : sto 4 apt Twinkle, 5 to 2 apt Calihan, 4 to 1 apt Yorkshire Grey. The latter was first o ff , bat soon pea way to Twinkle, who carried on the mos to the bmnebeed, where Brwifield mine through, and having all male at the distance, won cleverly by a length, a head dividing the second and third ; Greenwich Fair was fourth, Diadem hftb. and Celli:no sixth. THE Two YIAI.OLD STAKEH of 5 EOTL each, 3 ft, with 25 added : colts, Bat 71b ; fillies, Sat 3lb ; winners extra. Allowances, kr. ; the winner to be sold for 100 nova., if demanded ; if entered to be mold for 50, allowed 51b. Three quarters of a mile. (7 subs.) Mr. J. Land's Dominos'. sat 111, , 501.) ifialt) I Mr. lUghy's Strawberry Leaf, Tat 1111) (Mt ..(Chapmau) Mr. Hopwood's Charles Von. Tent 1110 01.1 (*den; I lir. Adkins's tkritta, eat Ilb(60L) (W. white) 4 Captain Bernard's Parogart, Tat 71h , 50L) (Thomas) 6 Betting : 6to 4 apt "'magnet, 7to 4 apt Charles Fox, 4to I apt any other offered. They rso well together, Dositta with n slight lend, up to the distance, where she pve way to the others, a splendid race ending in favour of Dump by a head ; hall a length dividing second and third. Tee STAND HANDICAP of 3 SOTS. each, with 20 added ; wieners estra. One mile. Mr. Wallows Madera. 4 yet. 7 4 t sib !Whiteley) t I Mr. Woods Calllen, 3 yrs, eat Mr. B. Lands Cheesecake, 4 yet, 7st 'Beesley) 3 Mr. Thompson's rlberwraxl, 3 yes, .at 311, .. H. Taylor, 4 Betting : Even ou Calihoui, 6 to 4 eget Diadem, 3 to 1 agst Sherwood. The two favourites singled themselves out from the commencenient, and ran • splendid race home, the Wessilhog it • deed boat, Cioseataig Aoki; ing some bar the wood. Deciding beat :sto 4 ou Callboy who was dellekel easily by ball a lowsth. OZZAT EIGHT-OARID Rana.— A splendid eight aired rues was rowed yesterday between members of the Lou don nowise:Mb. This was the winding•uprace of the season, wad was for • valuable silver *se, the distance being the areal eight-oared course from Putme7 to Chiswick. The wows n a me ie as under :—Mr. &Motel • and, 1 ; Mr. Cue. Issee's erase, 0 ; MT. Boydell's WSW, 0. TEM LATE FATAL FIRS AT BITIINAL-OREZN. Az inquest was held vestenlay. before Mr. Humphreys, wooer for kist Middlesex. at the Loudon Hospital, on the body of Mrs. White, who lost bet Ids through the severe %juries reeeivod at the above the. The unfortunate woman wakes the Mb victim to this Immutable occurrence. The demand bad cohabited for several year. with William *swarth, ass., who also died from his injuries, soda, whom an Immest was held last 'Thursday. Sh e was brought to the hospital is a cab no Weilseedav morning lam, severely Mimed, and lingered on until Sunday morning, when death pet ea sod to bar su ff erings, although she preserved her roe safetrams le the lest. The acocust the unfortunate woman gave iu her deposition before the coroner es Thianday last was, that h erse lf and William Roworth ',Hied to bed on the Tuesday evening. about 11 o'clock, when •Rowerth, who was the worse for liquor, plated a audit between the two pillows for the purpose of reeding, sad that sbe was awakened about 2 o'clock in the morning by the bed and bedclothes is thanes, and the sight. beeself sad Roworib out On. She ',consoled nothing mere Intl pied in the eth to be taken to the bee piteL The widows takes by the corou.rr ea this smoke was laseely o impales of that gives last week, sod the raillow " Atlanta • bele seedna.dee sj, by the ooreei r , :steroid • Thin morning at half-past 11, Richard Guinness Rill was brought up in the custody of Mr. Wild, the Rugby police superintendent, pursuant to the remand from Satur day last, on a charge of having wilfully falsified the registry of births for the sub-district of Rugby, in reference to the birth of his son, in January, 1859. As on the previous occasion the court was crowded to asease, a large portion of the audience consisting of ladles. The interest in the COW appeared to have rather imireamd than subsided since the last examination. The presiding magistrates were Mr. J. Pi 7 .Boughton Leek (ehairmsn), the Rev. It. Liekorisb, the Hon. C. L. Butler, Mr. C. K. Ciddecott, Mr. J. Atty, Mr. J. A. Campbell, sod Mr. J. Pears. The prosecution was conducted, as on the former occasion, by Mr. Cooke, solicitor, of King-street, Cheeped. ; and Mr. Philbrick, instructed by Messrs. White and Collisson, de fended the prisoner. The prisoner, who seemed to be in better health and spirits thee on Saturday, was allowed to be seated. John Collis, of Oodalmingstreet. Doctors'oceonsoos, cord keeper in the Bishop of London's registry, was called by Mr. °oohs, and produced from the depository of re cords is Bt. Paul's Cathedral a oertificate of marriage. Mr. Philbrick, having examined the document, said—l object to this entirely ; there is no proof of the hand writing. Mr. Cooke thereupon called Mr. Maltby, the English vice-consul at Brussels, who proved that the signature of the chaplain, the Rev. W. Drury, to the certificate was that of the clergyman who officiated at the marriage of the prisoner and his wife. He also ideotifiad the signatures of the witnesses to the mar riage, the first being the Hon. Mr. Eden, who was at the time an attaché to the English embassy at Brussels. Mr. Philbrick still objected to the reception of the certi ficate, which he said in no seise could be received as evi dence in this country. It was not proved that the certifi cate was issued by any person in the discharge of an ME. cial duty, nor that the registry was kept or required to be kept by law. In a celebrated peerage case such evidence had been rejected by the Morino! Lords, who had decided that proof should be given that the registry was kept in macedoine with the law of the country in which the roar• riage took place. Mr. Cooke said be would supply the necessary evidence. Mr. Collis was then recalled, and proved that certificates of marriage contracted between British subjects in Brussels. performed by clergymen of the church of England, were required to be registered in tke registry of the Bishop of London, and were deposited in St. Paul's Cathedral. The course was to enter the register in a book from the certifi cate, and deposit the certificate itself in the cathedral. Such had been the custom for many years. Mr. Philbrick observed that this only proved that the dm-sunset came from official custody. The question was. was is made by the chaplain in the discharge of a public duty which he was required by law to perform They must have the chaplain from Brussels to prove that. On further examivation the witness said he was not pre pared to state by what authority the registration took place, but the certificates were transmitted through the Foreigmoffice for registration. Mr. Maltby was again called, and deposed—l was preset at the marriage referred to in the certificate now produced. The parties married were Mr. Richard Guinness Hill (the prisoner) and Amy Georgians Burdett. I identify the prisoner as the one party, and Mrs. Hill, whom I saw this monism as the other. Mr. Cooke-1 submit that the marriage is now proved. Mr. Philbrick--In a criminal case I can admit nothing. Mr. Atty (the magistrate)-1 don't see what the mar riage km to do with the case, which is one of falsifying the register el births for this dimeise, Examination resumed by Mr. Cooke—Have the parties lived together aims the marrisge—Yes. Have you been called upon to arrange differences between them? Mr. Phi'brick submitted that that bad nothing to do with the matter, which was simply a question whether or not the register on the sth January was falsified by the prisoner Hr. Cooke said he wished to show that the child was that of the prisoner and his wife, and also what was the object of the prisoner in falsifying the register. He then asked the witness in what respect the signature "It. Hill" in the column headed " Father" in the register produced was false. Mr. Philbrick—To that question I entirely object. It is proved that a person named Richard Guinness Hill, who is 'destined as the defendant, was married ; and, if the evi dence is to be believed, the same person signed the re. sister. The document speaks for itself, and surely the ma gistrates do not require any evidence on that subject. Mr. Cooke, with the permission of the chairman, re peated the question. Mr. Maltby—The only &newer I can give is that the per son who signed " IL Hill" is the rune person as Richard Guinness HilL Eliza Jeffries was then called—l live in Rugby-Gelds, and am the wife of Thomas Jeffries, a labourer. I remember the kb January, 1839. I was sent for on that day to the Globe Inn to nuns a lady about to be confined. I at tended her in her confinement. She was delivered of a male child. Mra Hill and bar child were then called in sod identified by the witness. The appearance of Mrs. Hill created much sensatioe. She was followed by a young lady carrying the child, whom the prieceerclosely and aoxiously scrutinised during the whole time it remained in the court. Hrs. Hill wore a white veil, and showed an evident reluctance to become an object of so much public interest. The little fellow, although his bead was bandaged up, bad a hue of health upon his rather plump cheeks, and surveyed the people in a quick and ia telligeot manner. Examination resumed—The prisoner was living at the Gloloilan at the time. Re called himself Mr. Hill. By the Chairman—l have never seen it since, until recently. I know it by its general features, and by the colour et its hair and eyes. I saw the prisoner at the Globe lon frequently while I wee there. He came into the room freqisently while Mrs. Hill was confined. By Mr. Cooke—l remained in that service at the Globe about seven or eight days. I believe it was eight day. I left so early because the gentleman told me that his wife was taken ill on hie way. and be could not afford to keep • nurse any longer. That was what he told the landlady. He said to me that he must let me free, for he had • nurse coming from London to take the baby. The prisoner paid me for my services. Mr. James Brett, the detective, was next called. He pro duced the box and shawl which had been previously intro. duced in evidence, and in answer to Mr. Cooke said—l ob tained the box oo the 13th of June from Mrs. Andrews. The shawl I °hulloed from Mr. Cooke, the solicitor, on the 14th of the same month. I was first employed in this cam towards the latter end of May. Fix what porpoise were you employed? Mr. PhilMick—Oh, 00, no; we shall next have it asked what an your instructions. By Mr. Cooke—Since m employment in the matter I have had interviews with t he prisoner. It was on the 7th sad Bth of June, at Mr. Cooke 's offices in Cheapside. What was the object of your interview ? Mr. Philbriek-1 cannot have that what passed between client and attorney cannot possibly be admitted. It is moostroua to attempt to give such evidence in order that • mac may be committed on a criminal charge. What passed between the detective and the prisoner long before his arrest can have nothing to do with the falsification of the register. This is the moat monstrous and wicked thing I ever heard of. (Much laughter and cheers.) Mr. Mullet& said the prisoner went to Mr. Cooke's office ecesequeoce of • letter of invitation from Mr. Cooke. Mr. Cooke—What did the primmer say in your hearing? —He said be came to London a few days after the birth of the child. _ . . Mr. Philbrick—t object to this entirely. What the wit nen beard the prisoner say in the presence of the solicitor for the preeecutioo cannot be evidence to fix a criminal change. (To eitnees)—Who instructed you Witness—Mr. Cooke. Mr. Philbrick—You and the prisooer were there by his invitatioe, given in a letter signal " yours truly." Mr. Cooks-1 was cot dna solicitor for the prosecution. Examinatioe remmisd—l took the prisoner into custody os 14th September. The warrant was granted on the 24th Jane. I took him into custody at No. 6, Trinity-square, Southwark, Landau. Hebad apartments there. The land lady told ass ia his pusses that the apartments were taken OU that Jay. Mn. Hill was then living at No. lb, Trinity. square. I dna% know that he was making any attempt to see Hn. HALL Ho bed la Ids bat a pair of falls whis kies and a his ariasteabo. Oa the muse day that I 31r. Cooke proposed to put in a letter from the prisoner to his wife, which Mr. Philbrick objected to, on the ground that as the wife could not give evidence for or against her husband, so no communication passing between them could be received in evidence. The Chairman —ls the letter materiel! Mr. Cooke—it is material only as ehowing that the primmer informed his wife that the child wu dead, and that he had paid for the funeral. The Chairman—My opioion is that a letter from a hus band to the wife in such a CUM may be read. (Applause.) Mr. Philbrick—l must really ask to be protected by the bench in the exercise of my duty in a criminal case from these very indecent exhibitions. The Chairman--The interruptions which have taken place by the audience, it must be obvious, have a tendency to im pede the administration of justice. I am sure you all wish that the guilty alone shall be convicted, and It must be the feeling of all present that it is proper in them to hear the evidence in becoming silence ; but the noise and tumult which had arisen both oo the present sod the former occa sion have interfered with the gentlemen of the press, who are here in the discharge of their duty, and in some degree have prevented the magistrates from hearing the evidence. I hop that after this we shall have no repetition of these improper interruptions. Mr. PhilbrickLlt is A cardinal principle in criminal juris prudence that a husband and wife cannot be called to give evidence either for or against each other, and it necessarily follows that on a criminal charge the communications which have pissed between husband and wife cannot be given in evidence. The text books are clear and explicit on the sub ject, and I, therefore, firmly object to this oorrespondence being received. If the bench require any authonty upon the point, I would refer them to "Taylor on Evidence, in which it is said that the first class of subjects which the law protects from disclosure is that of communications between husband and wife. This wise enactment, it is added, rest. ow the obvious ground that the admission of such testimony has a fearful tendency to disturb the peace of &milieu, cause domestic broils,and destroy that feeling of mutual con. Memos which is the endearing solace of married life. Upon that authority, which is dear and unmistakeable I ask the bench to decade that all these communications between Mr. and Mrs. Hill shall not be admitted. The bench decided that the letters should not be received., and the chairman observed that they could be produced at the trial, when it would Deepen to the prisoner's counsel to object to their admission as evidence. Mr. Cooke said this concluded the evidence for the pro's cutlets, and he asked that upon that evidence the prisoner should be committed for trial. Mr. Bloxam, the clerk of the magistrates, then read to the prisoner the charge made against him, and with the usual caution asked him if he had anything to say. The Prisoner—l leave it to my counsel Mr. Phillrick then rose to addles. the magistrates upon the part of the defendant. He said it now became his duty, as counsel for Mr. Richard Guinness Hill, to address some observations to the bench, by way of remark upon the case generally and in answer to the specific charge upon which he appeared. At the outset he might state that the extraordinery public interest which attached to the case, the romantic details respecting it with which the public press teemed, the peculiar circumstances under which the charge had been preferred, and last and not least the excitement it occasioned, an exhibition of which, even in a court of justice, could not be restrained, I alike conspired to reader that duty one of some difficulty and emberrastrient. Mr. Hill was a ' gelation= of birth and petition, whose connexions were of the highest respectability, and against whom until this case arose there never existed a breath of suspicion ; and he was satisfied that io a case involving such a charge against a ' gentleman of that description, /4 body of country gentlemen, sitting there to administer justice, would not a ll ow them selves to be influenced in the slight est degree by what had pored out of doors, and that. Mr. Hill would receive what the meanest person in that town and every British subject was entitled to—a fair and impartial bearing, and an honest, candid, sod just &deem. When the facts came to be care fully looked iato and divested of all extraneous and Mina. tared matters, as well as of the prejudice which had been excited, for a purpose very well known to these who conducted the defence, he would venture to say that a moreouiserable rag of a case, on which it was naked that a gentleman should be committed fur trial at the useless, had never been presented to a bench of nui4istratee It must be quite obvious to every person who had watched the proceed lugs that the prosecution had been instituted from motives of personal revenge sod malignity towards Mr. Hill. Had they not been asked to divulge the confidential communications which had passed between man and wife? Such a thiug bud never been herd of before in England. even in the moat troublous times, and especially in ease in which the letters were used with a view to the prejudice of the husband. A strong motive—nod an exceedingly strong one—had been shown for the prosecution. It wet quite clear that it was the wife and her advisers who bad instituted and conducted these pro. mediegs. It could not he denied that it was a contest between husband and wife, and that the wife appeared here as the accuser of her husband. As the case was opened before the bench, it became im. portent to ascertain what were the pecuniary motives by which it wax alleged that Mr. Hill had been influenced, and the relations in which in this respect the husband and wife stood to; each other. The prosecution said that Mr. Hill had wilfully falsified the register, and it was insinuated that hie motive was to obtain some pecuniary advantage for him• self. He (the learned counsel) objected to the production of any widen°, having reference to matters that happened subsequent to the alleged falsification, on the ground that such evidence could not have effect in law, as bearing on a cam which was complete when the false information by which the register was falsified was given. But that objec tion had been overruled, the bench having decided that it was competent to adduce evidence of what afterwards occurred, in order to show the motive that was supposed to influence the act charged. He (Mr. Philbrick) was glad that it was so. As he understood the case brought forward on the other side, it was that a child having been bora of this marriage between Mr. aid Mrs. Hill, Mr. Hill himself coused to be inserted those false statements in the register, in enter by concealing the existence of that child to secure to himself some pecuniary benefit under the marriage settle ment. But how did it appear? First of all under the set- Moment Mr. Hill hail a life interest, which no child nor any number of children could deprive him of. Sothatany objeethe might have had in suppressing the birth of the child as re. eluded pecuniary advantage ariaing out of the marriage set tlement must refer to some ulterior result after his decease. How stood the case in this respect? They had it in evidence that the property was to go to the children of the marriage if more than one, or if one only then to that one under a joist power of appointment. If there were no children Mn,. Hill took it absolutely in the event of her surviving her husband, or if the husbeud outlived the wife, and no power of ippointment was exercised by the wife, then be took one moiety, the other moiety going to her next of kin. There was this material fact in the case, that the only interest Mr. Hill could have in the settled property was to the extent of one moiety in the event of there being no issue by the marriage, and even as to thee it was in the power of his wife to defeat hfm. If she survived him she had the whole, sad if she did not still she bed full power of appointment over it if she chose to exercise it, aced by a stroke of her pen could prevent his touching one peony of the money. I.le suppression of the fact of the child's birth, therefore, so far from producing any pecuniary benefit to him, would have been perfectly useless ; and in this way the motive which had been brought forward on the part of the prosecution was a double-edged sword which recoiled with force upon those who used it. It had been said in the public papers that the property in question amounted to about 14,000 f. a year. This was one only of many exaggerations which had been invented by the ingenuity of those who had compiled the narrative with so much ingenuity from information web deadly furnished—whether from the office of the solicitor for the prosecution, from the gleanings of the detective, or from the statements of Mr. Maltby, it was needless to in quire. One thing was clear, and that was that the trust fund was not 14,11001., but, as he observedby the 20f. stamp affixed to the deed of settlement, the whole value of the =y, both in possession and in reversion, did not es- OM ; and the magistrates were asked here to believe that for the sake of a moiety of 8,009 f. after his decease, be had been guilty of this *impression end this unnatural cruelty. If there hail been suppression, and it had been influenced by pecuniary motives, it was perfectly clear that the wife must have been beset and part hi it. Let them follow out the question of pecouiery motive on the part of the husband. Mr. Hill, it appeared, was married in the year 1852 to Miss Bardset, who was than about 19 years of age. She was a Loadooer, and be was an Irishman. They lived abroad npontbe co n tinent A young wife . entuntilshewas 20 yeas r. so o ld g before hba. t.d living there ew i r any hopeof ig together for nearly seven years, and uo issue. Then they were told that the lady suddenly proceeded from Dublin to Leiden, in Janury, Dtriee, to be confined, but whet they nten heard t m a sd ho e ut hy th t e h :it l te ic r it liz ward pro s prosecution. th ut e l io '° E d . ted o l f t t a i h r im e peared st : to t.. no where the was known, sail where every attention would vis ahe it w b a ar nt t4 hus in ta i n i d d 'e s° 4- T i t e e nd ti s et b rL' u eel t n instead of staying there, have been paid to her, she left, and came on towards Loudest to be confined, nod under circumstances of such pressure, ' and so clam to the pitied of her confinement, that she was taken ill by the way, and compelled to stay at Rugby, where at • little she was weaned, where not a single friend or member of her or her husband's family could be pelisse. It was a Ida gular feature in this case that DO friamd or noussidas of time lady's had been called to prove that the ever said she wax in the family-way, or that • word was ever heard before she Wee at Rugby of the expected birth of • child. Why did she leave the place where she would have found frien d. in that most trying and critical period" It meet have been for the purpose of concealment, and oonceshment on her part. Then the confinement having taken place, they found her left by her husband, who went to Leedom. He did not want to can attention to whet Mr. Hill did there ; but it was quite clear that while he was away she sent off her child, her tint-horn, an infant ten days old, in the deed of scold winter's night, by railway to Landau. She soot it by a girl fourteen years old, and by a train which srrived in London at eleven o'clock at night. Could the court believe that that child was seat in opposition to the mother's wish ? That was the point ; that was what it came to, and here was the explanation of all the care that had been taken to get up a prejudice against Mr. Hill; and here they had some clue to the reason why ithad been attempted to charge him with biotin bees actuated by pecuniary motives. Pecuniary motives there could not have been ; sad as to other motives, the wife must have participated in them to the full extent. Could it be believed by any man er woman that without the knowledge of the wife the child oink' have been cos signed to the persons with whom it hod been placed? The facts spoke for themselves. The wifesaust have known all that was done and all that was proposed to be dams, and her conduct at this stage of the pniesedings afforded a pretty clear index of her bona fides throughout They had had one of Wee wretched women brought up from the House of Correction at Westminster, and through her it had been proved that some baby limn had been sent up for the use of the child. Who sent it up? The smother of source. Then there had been an endeavour to excite prejudice against his client in reference to the marking of the baby linen. It had been said that the marks had been cue out. He appealed to any mother of a family present whether it was custoniary to mark baby linen at all. Then se to the proof that was brought forward of the erasure of media— • piece cut out from the collar of an infant's nightgown and filled in was simply absurd. This was sample of the whole. It was like the 14,0001. • year to which the child was said to be heir, and it marked the whole character of the pressoutio2 In regard to the con duct of the accused, the evidence of Brett, the detective, showed clearly that whatever might be the cause of the re moval of the child to London, the prisoner gave every in formation in his power for the purpose of recovering it. He (the learned counsel) held that it was perfectly clear that in all that was done, the wife must have been io com plicity with the husband—that if the existence of the child Mid been suppressed it must have been with her know ledge and consent, and if there was guilt anywhere it was equally clear she must have been a partner and partici pator in it. She must have known of everything that happened to the child, and in this they bad some indication of the motive which led her to in this prosecution of her husband. For a mother, under the circumstances stated, to suppress and conceal the birth of her child, and that child her firstborn—to allow it to remain for more than two years without a word of in quiry as to its fate—showed that she must have had the strongest possible motive for that concealment, and it must have been • motive of the deepest possible pressure to have thus overcome the natural yearnings of a mother's heart. What that motive was it was not his business now to inquire. He would not go into the question whether it waste conceal bee own shame or hide the dishonour which she might have brought on her husband's nuptial couch. These were matters that mast be gone into hereafter • and if the object of the prosecution was, in the course the y had adopted, to elicit what facts might be forthooming at some future period to sustain a charge of adultery against the wife, they would be disappointed. Those were circum stamen which must be examined before Sir Croswell Craiga von, and no part of the evidence that might be brought forward in the prosecution of ulteii.o• proceedings would be even alluded to on the present occasion. His instructions restrained him from further alluding to those circumstances. As unnecessary annoyance had also been inflicted upon Mr. Hill by calling him throughout the proceedings "prisoner." He had always understood that in a case of misdemeanour the person accused was styled defendant. Mr. Bloxam said if there was any fault in that respect he was chargeable with it, as he had styled the accused " pri soner," according to the usual course. Mr. Pbilbrick gave every credit to Mr. Bloxam for hiving discharged his duty in this painful matter with kindness and consideration to the accused. Mr. Hill was there to answer a charge of having, on the 7th January, 1869, made certain fahe statements to the registrar as to the birth of his child, for the purpose of their being inserted in the register— an offence which by the act of parliament was made a misdemeanour liable to the penalties of perjury. Now, the section which referred to the matter war the 2002, and that required that the father or mother of the child should, on being applied to by the registrar, give within 42 days from the date of the birth, the necessary In formation for the purpose of registration ; but there was no such application in this ease, as far as was known. On the cannery. they had it in evidence that fdr.,Hill himself went voluntarily on the 7th of January, two days after the birth of the child, to Mr. Herbert, the assistant registrar, whose decease was much to be regretted, as it threw a gnat ob stacle in the way of a satisfactory investigation of this part of the casejand furnished him with the requisite particulars. Much had bees maiden legal duty, but there waste, legal duty on the part of Mr. Hill to register the child until he was called to do so by the registrar. Could it be said, then. that his object was to supprre the existence of the child, when within two days of is birth he went to the registrar and gave the information required by the act ? Could it be supposed that at that time, with all the excitement conse quent upon the birth of his first child, he would have gone to the registrar to furnish him needlessly and unnecessarily with facts for the purpose of making materials to found • charge against him! Surely no man in his senses would be guilty of so great an absurdity. Then, as to his signing the re gister, Mr. Maltby swore that having seen Mr. Hill write more than • dorm times, the five letters, " R. Hill." atthched to the entry in the register were in the defendant's hand writing. He would only ask the bench on that point to compare the five letters with the signature on the deed of settlement. Redoubt it was Mr. Hill's signature, and though he chose to leave out the fall name, " Richard Guinness," there was nothing extraordinary in that, as it was a common practice amongst many persons, and even judges, Mr. Baron Bramwell, for instance, to use only one initial, although they had several Christian names. There was so inaccuracy in ' the signature, though it was not given in full, and those parts of the entry which were inaccurate were not in the handwriting of the defen dant, but of Mr. Herbert, the late usistant.registrar, who they had been told by the chief registrar had so frequently committed errors that he had been celled upon to resign his office ; and it was under such circumstances that Mr. Hill was charged with falsifying the register. Had it not been for the excitement raised in the public mind by the many mis statements which had been put forth betore the defendant had an opportunity of offering a word in explanation, could it be supposed that any magistrate would commit, or any jury couvict ? Looking, then, at the case in all its beariuge—to the evidence as to the imbecility of Mr. Herbert, the local registrar, and the fact that Mr. Hill need not have gone to the registrar at all, he con tended that the charge of wilful falsification had woefully and lamentably broken down ; and be called upon the magistrates not to commit his client, urging upon them that there could be no failure of justice if they discharged him, seeing that the prosecution might if they pleased prefer • bill of indictment before a grand jury, in which case he had no doubt as to how the matter would be dispose! of by a superior court. He bad shown that there could have been no pecuniary motive in thecae.. and thabeven if the case for the prosecution could be believed, Mrs. Hill i must have been cognisant from first to last of all that had been going on as to the disposal of the child, and most have been • party to it. Could they suppose that the girl Parsons did not, ou ber return to Rugby, tell her mistress of the sort of persons with whom she had left the child? Yet they found that the mother bad preserved a dead silence for upwards of two years. Was that consistent with the statement put forward on the part of the prose cution! With regard to the falsification of the re enter, he had the authority of Mr. Justice Blackburn, in the case of the queen against Barbour, tried at wild ford, in IMO, which involved a charge of falsifying the re gister, that the object of the act was to prevent falsibcation for pecuniary advautage, and to mark his sense of the frivolous nature of the c harge he iotlicted • floe of a shilling upon the defendant. In conclusion, he would all upon the bench not, front any prejudice which had been excited against the defendant, to commit him, nor to deprive him of that fair measure of justice to which even the meanest subject of the realm was entitled. There was evidently some mystery in the um, something concealed on the part of the prosecution which was kept back for their own pur poses. But he trusted that the magistrates would do their duty with firmness, and spare his client the annoyance and disgrace of being committed for trial upon such a charge. At the coachmen of Mr. Philbrick's address the magis trates retired to a private rOOOl, and during their absence, which ;Anted little more than five minutes, an intense feel ing of anxiety was evinced by the crowded court to know the result. Their worships having returned and taken their ants. The Chairman said—The inamstndes, hawing considered the case, are unanimously of opinion that the defendant should be sent to take his trial for the offence with which be stands charged. They are also of opinion that, should bail be staked, the bail should be himself in LOW., and two sureties in 5001. each. _ _ Yr. I'hilbrick applied to have the hail eodoreed on the back at the writ, in order that it might be taken by a War. widish** magistrate in Loodoo. The Chairman said the application would be acceded to. The prisoaer was then fiirmally committed to take his trial at the ensuing Warwick assizes, and Mr. Cooke, as the proaseator, and the witnesses, were severally bound over to promote. The proceeding,' then concluded, and the prisoner was conveyed, with fle mune arersry with which he wee bmogbt to the wort, to the lock•uy to Rugby. lu the evening he was conveyed by train to Warwick, cod cooligocd to the custody of the governor of the meaty gaoL