The Express. — London, England, 1860-07-17 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HMI OF LORDIL—NoNDAr, JULY 16. l'be 6 LORD Causeiwoa took hi mat de the wooiniek al eack. SUBDIVISION OP NOME& Lard ;ftelltroll7bie the C7Ollll, w ic k, mew, ' r i m i i noi.- ie..... to enhiliviiie ilioce.as. whittle was read • first tow tl. iiabl that it wag Dot his intention topr further with the bill in the present teenon. X ZEALAND CRBANCES IN SEW ZEALkS D. lAA GRAN PI Ll..f.mos t:sitiiTthinlreadin4 of this ma Lai• I Ll' expremed a hope that the govern meat would postwar the thirl reading until the papers which had bees primmest hr the Duke of Newcastle were ham. Gm limns He a. inquired whether the govern ment could give any intniniation to the homee resiecting the dirtueleoces at New Plymouth and other torts of the isetheru island of New Zealand 7 The hut accounts in the Etialish newsp,pers were very scanty and unsatisfactory. A telegraph message simply wid that the rebellion was extend ki..;, ao. ..,.her aerm int. were ti i the effect that the whole natives 4 the island were becoming ilissatiefled, and that Isstst= LI. e oneral wee anticipated. Fr om wh a t he u. oi: , :e iocal newspaper , . aml particularly in the Welling ton newspapers, ea well as in private acniunts, be had reanin to hope that those alarming accounts were in soma direr inaccurate. He knew there was great distress anions the nativia in the Plymouth settlement. and also oiusulerahle dimatisfactioo, and it was close that much to he door that subject ; but no renamed the pr • ...era outbreak, he hart every reason to hove tlt..t it would soon be Lai G r ZMILLE said be would tot object to the post ponement of the thin! reading of the bill until the papers in question were before their lonlahips. With regard to the esoord question, the information received by the govera latent respecting the ilieturbanees in New Zealand were to the effect that no more righting bad taken place between the Maoris and the troole. and that the governor hail re turned t.. Auckland. the inhabitants of which hail been re asv.orcil. the ',Lee having been put in a state of defence. One great difficulty in the way of putting an end to those slidu was die extreme hostility evino-el by the Euro pean settlers towards the natives, and the demand made by them of Wad for blood. XICE AND SAVOY.-THE EUROPEAN CONFE RENCE. TL • Mlniula 04 ('LANItRiIIDE, in moving fora copy el the letter. Admired by the Foreige-office to the Duke dI Wellington in lel:, comerning the military frontier of Savoy, sod that, hooking to the treaty of Turin and the cir remetioces under which it was mediated. heobje-teel tithe English government coosentingtotake a pert in the proposed European conferrer*. iniumuch as their doing so would be necessarily a recognition on their pert of that treaty as a pert of ribs public law of Europe. Lord WODEHOUSE said there would be no difficulty 'bolt the ppd.; but with respect to his noble friend's obi jeetion to going into the conference without a previous I miderstanchng, it should be borne in mind what were the carcurnetaaces which had indueed the government to con seed to a oossferenee. Very singularly bus noble friend had overloeked the wishes of Switzerland herself IA his obser vations. whereas it Wee at the request of Switzerland that her Kajeety's g averment had cionseated to be represented. (Hear 1 The Swiss ciedil not real appeal to the general quee n.. of European expediency, they had a right to a confer rer. of the powers be the Ai:de-Chapelle protocol, and an caper,. etipuLtiou of the treaty of Vienna. --(The noble lord here reel the concheling clause of the Dente of Vienna, whnh provided for Switzerland an appeal to the powers in the case .4 env violative of her territory, end proireeded)— It appeared, then, that the Swiss were enipowered to de mewl a ronferenee, and they had demanded it ; and that was the masons why her Majesty's government were ready to go into the conference. His noble frilled the Secre tary for Foreign Affairs had shown in the de...patches that lie was fully sensible of the importance and gravity of USIA pi-dim. anal that to felt the importance me:Adman- Mg Bei territorial pomessions of Switzerland. He. noble friend also felt wind a serious inroad had hem male in the territorial arrangenienta of Europe it would be melees t. diseess the motives of those who bad taken part is thee, mittens. But one thing was perfectly certain • that the treatie, which bad been concloded, and by elo-h eeivoy 11..1 L<a .141•AAIRI to France, had seriously streets.' and alt• fed the position of Switverhuid and had meetly diminished tirie eiefety of thateountry, and had given ▪ prerivlent of iagerous and unsatiefactory character to berme. (Hear, hear I The Marquis of N. iRMANBY said he agreed that some attention ought to he pail to this wishes of Switserland, who had invite I this conference, but he did not epee with hie *Ale int 4 i that the positim of Switzerland was worse than it Lad be. o lefor.• i, regarded Europe. Oa the contrary. the ga:lett 'tend %Lich she had made had raised bet in the satin. mid n .4 Eux-pe. Viscount RTlt.t•rEtr•RD liE REDCLIFFF. said he was sled the motion bad been accepted by the government as • emeemion to the very moderate aad reesnimble speech of as made Inaeitua. At the rime time, the subject to which the motion relatol wus of &mom sztessire character, mil he gathered from the silence which had been observed by made lords opposite that there was so disposition to die eau it at any ie inoderable 'teeth. He could not but admit the fore. ut the oleervatioes which had fallen from hie DAM friend (Lord Wiekhouse) in support if the views of her Majesty's goveren.ent, but he must be allowed to ob serve that the subject was so much home with danger, that there was to niece a delicacy in everything ap pertaiame to it--(hear, bey)—end that there was se little certaisty si to the results of the sessfereono that it ivied.' have been saatasfastory to have Lamed from the mererement that it WAS their intention to mom to some underetamling with Frame before say further dips wee* taken. He thought that by gotta; into the coo freest, they were ex2tate.l to the dimmers of appearing to give their modem to tee annexation of :Lvov to France, err .4 itevessing the cie:irews and retraneerneet which hail lately taken piaci between this cougar. and France. He was of opinion that what this country we called upon se do was to ilia.ateas as far is parable. consistent with,the Moray mil heaour of the coantry, a stets of ream sod g'-el feeling towards Frame. He did ant entirely wet with Vis able friend the Marquis of CLinricarder Rut it was to the perm :nett Mimed of the couny to mountain a cle.e• and fiereal alliance with Frame, though La limbered that it was for the general advantage of Emote Met the two countries deem remain m a dat e o f gen e r a l • eerh evin.iiie, a ileum to consult the interests and besnur of both. Su- It relations would in is opinion be inch more conducive to a lasting good understanding tetween the two eouctrie. than the mom forted, close. and istinuite alliance suggested by the wild uiarquie. Such an atelerstatialin i j ext.tell at this moment in reference to ••perattome at a 0.114L0t part of the world. and in another T. drat not asi remote, awl all that WW•4l,inhie for she future was, that such a state of relations should be inunteined as should eel to cordial .imity upon all waiters einieerimg the g •emend tutereete Europe. With regard tot the pretties he could assure their lord ship. that no one rorld admire more than he del the con duet .4 the d:stieguieheil eonfederacy of that country. iving been formerly connected with that conntry in an • capacity, aedbasies hail an opportunity of remark. rag the kistore . : virtues of the people perpetuated through as many gmerations, he -reuld not hut feel satisfaction a t lie reasonable &mends the confederacy had made in =forward in defence of what they coneidered their ha and he should be glad to see her Majesty's gmernmest ea:Oiled to give them as much countenance as the eircumet•aces of the ease won't' permit. He did not Musk that is the preseet delete full justice bail barn done to the position in which Switzerland died, and to the great ignalite, which her Teeple possemel. When he saw a meats, with such a heisted I•••pulation lillu A ing at, army late the field of not less than 100,01 A) men, and artillery in Earths° ; wham be It:acted (mot go I authority that were peeper' to Lick up that force if memory l.y • denammeratioe to a similar extent ; anal when he considered the limited means at their Iva port he felt impossible not to entei min the highest esteem fur their character. He did not aree with se epinens which had beet, rapeseed on a former (evasion, that the waguisit .4 Savoy by France was 'telt matter, but at the mine time he did not believe that the acquisition was of such a nature AS to .vnipromiae the getior interests of Europe or imperil the neute.lity of Ma:, Nu evret could hate show,, ti a more draw e r degree the power aa! France, and pert cep. allowance ana4lat to he male few the distruot anti apprelieusioe which tee mta,•riand hail manifieted M reference to the ulterior designs of let 01..113 pomerfol neighbour. He eat anti.nus that hoer Majesty'. government should be enable I to cum- out peectit Roopieui policy, of which be entirely approved, bat be C.,. strati that th e resu lt .4 the confer's:he a ie..l add to their ditheulties rather then diminish them. (Heir, heard Dint BROUGHAM esprea.erl his entire apiataaaal of the mei ark.. which )044 fallen from the :ethic lot ! the ruder lfs.vetary (Lord Wodeheitieh anal commeuted in strong t."" '1..1 the nature .4 the interferes-a Fraeee in the (rural affair. aaf It.ly. Ile thought the beet policy Lodi for Frenee wad 110 e wintry was a Vier ef noniesterveni ""'l aloe; Is laarettftl that kad bairn de...ate4 from Frame. con.plan t 4 that her motives were hap.- prrh snePsetel ; lout the hi et way to pr.reLit, suepieleit was to take care that 1,,,, saint cat hoewait. lie thnu lit it would he niurh whi ee e,,, ~„, h ul l to the intere sts Peewee alai of Kealatel that theta aboukl law •• ssl Mending betw e -e the t wo eiemtriee, than that eteli should• h e es • wors Yea foe the USA. ... t AWLS/IP. ::11 . .3.41fid, end vigilant prepare', ilioar. Ltar.) The imb*t thin dropped. •0 11)1121810N BILL Ow the eider 1,4 the home g u y I,o„,,minnoitt.oo this RAVENIMWORTH retaliated that a. thiA w a. telNuta viol., the woe se the bill la the ti h, .....e eoly questa°, oat whether the thew elau... to be edited thouid carriedla a sews% The Earl of CHICHLSTSJI mooed rho f.trt h..; pnvgros el the hill. Kato it posort the avow' rea4,,,4 Welty had ✓ hoes OV4IIII Illierinieriag striate effects ot the teseeese. He silmitto.l th it th...,:teet which his noble frimi the avower tad promo' o the •hill hod iu slew I/1r in perfwtly it c•n44 carried without to to existing isterest• Rot tale wind treat* very Illeivy thaw* upoo the e.'. OA. th e earth without swami! r 7 peowheoes thou. 'kart«. trot would, is fact, crate charges wlinis Vie r e goer of the mama ennonietiooete would not lel t., wet The noble earl tooehided by motioe at wino. Iti,c that the bait..e should go into ceeinsilgeo thy, bJI t'..• dey three astoutbs THE The saimialat mos swat be whim* • &Aoki% ari tti bill austiqually int. 11011710POLITAN - 11IIILDBM (AIII1!D1 7) Ttff.t: This hillpared the sopa eseig. LATH HARBOUR AND DOCKS SILL This wig abo read second time. BLEACHING AND DYEING WORKS BILL This bill was read a wood time. LOCAL TAXATION BILL. This bat passed tirough salinities JEWB ACT AMENDMENT BILL This bin was rod a third time sad passed. UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE =TATES BILL. . . . . ThiS hall was;aid7ithird time and CENSUS (ENULANI), ke.) BILL This bill was brought up from the House of Commons end read a Ant time ; as was also the Census (Ireland) This bill was resciletlissiiioie and paved, Their lordships adjourned at a quarter to 8 o'clock. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—MosDAY, JULY 16. The Sratcza tea the their at four o'clock. PETITION FROM THE CITY OP LONDON. The Sheriffs of London, Mr. Alderman Paturs,.Od Mr. Alderman GABRIEL, in their robes of of appeared at the bar, and presented a petition from the Lord Mayor, Alder men, and Common 1 ouncil of the City, in favour of the Criminal Procedure Amendment PRIVATE BUSINESS. The Lords' Amendments to the Denbigh, Ruthin, and Cornea Railway Bill, and to the May River Navigation Bill, were agreed to. Hamilton and Strathaven Railway Bill wag read a second time. NOTICES OF MOTIONS. THE PAPER DUTY. Sir J. TRELAWNY gave notice that be should repeat the motion which he ittempted to make • few days ago on going into committee of ways and means, for a resolution declaring (in the name terms se before) that in consequence of the House of Lords having rejected the repeal of the paper duty, and having thereby assumed the responsibility of the financial for the year, the House of Com mons should deelms to vote the supplies at present. PARTY PROCESSIONS AND OUTRAGES IN IRELAND. Mr. COGAN gave notice that he would move to-day for leave to bring in a bill further to restrain the public ex hibition of party dare and banners in Ireland. He would also ask the Chief Secretary for Ireland what steps the go vernment had taken in consequence of the lamentable riots and shooting of several persons near Lurgan, on the 12th of July. Mr. DAWSON 'eked the Chief Secretary if he had lacer tanned the origin of the late collision near Lurgan, and the ex ' tentof the calamity, and also whether, as it was said that con. aiderable excitement still prevailed in certain towns and districts of Ireland, any further breach of the peace was expected. Mr. CARDWELL deeply regretted to state that the oc currence with which the house was fanuliar had taken place in the neighbourhood of Lurpn. In the town of Lurgan, precaution+ had been taken, front an apprehension that it might possibly become the scene of trouble on the 12th July. The reoulent magistrate, who was usually stationed at Arliiiint to Lurgan, and a form of thirty a dditi ona l mama was at Lurgan. The peace of Lupin itself was preserved, but in the evening, as a party were going home through the mountain district to the north-west of Lurpn. these occurrences took place ; and he was to say that two persons were likely to have lost th li ven, owing to these deplorable transactions. Bet as there was an inquiry before the magistrates not yet terminated, he could not officially make an y further statement on that subject. With regard to the preserva tion of the peace, the magistrates were doing their utmost., and would be seconded by the government by every means in their power. Lord NA.AB asked whether any excuse had been offered for the police not having been at the place where this unfortunate affair occurred. It appeared from the account given to-day that/ this collision had been expected, and that those parties had left town early, in order, as they said, to get home before dark, lest any attack should be made. He hoped that an inquiry would be instituted, and that some reason would be given for the absence of the police at the spot where, as it appeared from the newspapers, the collision was expected. He sincerely hoped that every mortices would be made by the government to bring the wow who hod so disgraced their common country to speedy *ties and punishment. Mr. (MAN said perhaps the right hon. gentleman would state whether the place where this happened was under proclamation, and if not, whether it was the inten tion of the government to proclaim that district. Mr. CARDWELL replied that part of the county of Ar magh was under proclamation, but not the place where this occurred. He had not received any account of any recent disturbances in the other parts of Armagh, bat the hoc. gentleman was probably aware that at the Armagh maims 45 persons, of whom 25 were protestanta and Yll Roman eathole", were tried and pleaded guilty on a charge of riot ing. In Answer to his noble friend, he would say that the full Aloud reports had not yet reached him, so that he was not Ina condition to my who were the persons to be blamed. VACCINATION IN DUBLIN. Mr. BRADY asked whether the government intended to institute a vaccine board in Ireland similar to that which existed in England, and he called attention to the fact that the Cowpock lastitutice of Dublin, though receiving an an nual grant of 400 E for the purpose of supplying vaccination, chard d half-a-crown for two ivory points of vaccine lymph su to a r. CARDM., said the institution referred to was one which received a grant front parliament, its objee b t s l i i r e v is the gratuitous vaccination of the poor ; but he o that when the institution furnished vaccine lymph to pri -1 eete persons, it charged '2s. ad., but that it supplied me (heal practitioners for dispenaaries at half a-guinea a year, mid (MUD workhouses at one guini a. THE DZA.NERY OF YORK. ' Mr. KINNAIRD asked whether it was true that the in. come of the Deanery of York had been increased, and if so, when, and from what time, and for what reason, and from what fund ; sal whether any record was kept of the names of the Ecclesiastical Conuniesioners who attended and voted at the meetings of the commission? Sint:. C. LEWL9 mid the income of the Deanery of York had been ire-reamed out of the common fund of the Ecelesb taxa Commission to 2.000 C. a year by an artier in council, dated the lath of May last, and printed ia the London (knelt 4.! Wednesday, May 11411. The reason for that course was the report of the Ecclesiastical Comnialioners. The nem.+ of the ennimissionem who were present at any meeting sere recorded. REPORT OP"rtm EDUCATION COMMNSIONERS. Mr. ADDERLEY asked the Vice- President of the Com mittee of Council on Education whether the education commissioners were about to make any report, and whether the alarms of the Duke of N,wcaatle would cause a suspen. lion of their proc e edin gs ! Mr. LoWE said he was infornied by the commissioners that they hoped to he able to complete their rep. rt iu the count of the present veer. AGRICULTURAL WAGE 9. Mr. CAIRD asked th, President of the Poor-law Board whether it would be practisable to ascertain and publish, along with the monthly returns, the current rate of egri cultural wages in the satins unions in Faiglatel and Wales ; and whether it was the iutention of government so to amend the pont law, ea regards the power o f removal, as to admit of a more free circulation of labour throughout the count 7. Mr. VILLIERS widths subject to which his hon. friend's question referred had been under the consideration of the Poor-law Board fur some time past, mei from the ex perience which had been tamed he thought the informa tion which the hon. gentleman nought could be procured with tolerable accuracy. With regard to the publication of the facts in question, together with an monthly returns of poor rates and pauperism, that world require the moetion of the house, sad he had no doubt that that sanction would be readily accorded. With regard to the second part of the gumbo., the 'object was under consideration by • com mittee up-stairs, who would probably nal'e their report this week. It would therefore be premature to state the intentions of the government reveetimg it. THE BRONZE COINAGE Mr. HOPWOOD asked when the brume coinage would be issued. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said be was informed the Master of the Mint was prepared to proceed with the striking of the coin almost immediately, bat some time would necessarily elapse after the striking of the co'n before the issue could he commenced. It was necesse-y that about two months should elapse to have a sufficient accumulstion before they commenced the issue, and there fore the issue would My take place about the end of September. THE RE i ON THE POST-OFFICE. IR aeewer to Sir S. NORTHOMV, Mr. LAINO said the report of the commission of inquiry into the working of the Post-Mice was in type, and would be in the hands of the Postmastee•General in the course of two or three days. SUPPLY.--THE CHINA WAR. The report of the committee on supply was thee brought up. On the first vote, that a sum not exceeding 44'1.986/. be granted, to defray the expenses of the last China war, Sir J. PAK INGTON said it had been his intention to have availed himself of the receiviggi of the report on supply to advert to pennon! references which were made on a former evening to himself and his colleagues by the Prime Minister and the Secretary for Foreign Affruns, after he had left the house. He was extremely sorry that at the lima! l a me for public business neither of those two noble lords was in his place in the house. He therefore f^it ;.'odds to orswinsd. AS he should otherwise hare done, to defend himself and his colleagues from the imputations which were, he thought most inaleaervedly, cast upon them by those two noble lords. He therefor* gave notice that ou some tutus merlon be should call attention to the subject Sir G. ORLI( wad the observations of the noble lord the s'tretary for Pooelnn Affairs were made in answer to the noble lord the mentb e r f or Leieeetenlure (Lord John Mennen), sad in his presence and the presence of his col leagues. itotottiell said they were new setting an ex. ur It., the world 14 westward. which WAS 012- u'd t he .i so the pri sc i p h e of putioe, and were t e a c h - P """ r ° "PI• the* "Oaten& civilisation wee western TUESDAY EVENING, JULY 17, meek and murder. Recharged the right hon. gentleman the Chanoellor of the Exchequer, he charged the noble lord, he elged the Secretary for War, with haring deserted their They began right, but the change that had taken plies iu them was the result he feared of a change in their situations. That which was wrong when they were on the opposition benches was right when they were ow the Treasury benches. It was clear that on this occasion honour, justice and truth were neglected. The ministers sup ported that which in opposition they oppused—they were now the supporter, of murder, of dishonour, of dishonesty', and of lying, which when in opposition they had been the first to denounce. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he was far from deprecating further discussion on this grave quer lion, either by the hon. sad learned gentleman, or by other members of that house. It was a question that could hardly be too much discussed, and with regard to which it was de sizable that the people of England should arrive at the fullest posethle knowledge of details. He was very glad when be heard the hoeourable and learned gentleman address himself to this subject, because he must say, that however he denied the justice of his attack and crimination, and thought that his argument could not be maintained, he could not help respecting the ••EinAim which he dealt with it. He quite agreed that with the Chine.e government we should be es of the principle of truth and fair play as if we were dealing with the most powerful of states. (Hear, hear.) He would not attempt to follow the hon. and ',awned gentleman in this subject at present, because as respected the morality or immorality of the war in which we were most unhappily engaged in China it was i to Bible judge without a very exact and careful considera tion of the dates and documents to which the bon. and learned gentleman had alluded, but had alluded in terms so general that he thought his conclusions were no‘entitled to the reliance that might otherwise be given to them. To one principle, however, to which the hon. and learned gen tleman referred be must on the other hand enter kiscliment. The hon. and learned gentleman stated that the origin of the war which led to the treaty of Tien-ten® was on our part tainted with injustice, and that the Chinese entered into that treaty yielding to superior force. In both these propositions he was not indisposed to agree. He had de clined on former occasions tO agree with the lion. and learned gentleman ; but the hon. and learned gentleman enforced the argument to night, that as the origin of the war ion, unjust, the treaty by which it was concluded was a treaty that we were neither entitled to enforce DM the Chinese bound to observe. He could not sonde to that proposition. He thought that the contract stood se a good and valid international contract He did not mean to say that were it • question of pressing to extremes all the terms of that treaty, it would not be wise to use prudence and justice in the enforcement of those terms, out of a liberal regard to the relative position of the parties. But that was not the question on which we had been at issue with the Chinese government. The question was not, whether the treaty on our part was to be mercifully enforced, but whether the treaty—which had been concluded and re ceived the approbation in all its parts of the Emperor of China—should or should not be ratified at the capital of the Chinese empire. The hon. and learned gentleman should be aware that the ratification of the treaty was the primary object with which her Majesty's government had thought it their duty to resort to force. As regarded the question as to how far notice was given to us that our ambassador was to proceed to Pekin by the way of the Peiho, how far we were entitled to insist on using the main road of the empire, how far we were deceived with regard to the mani festations at the mouth of the river—all these circum stances he would not enter into now, because, as he had stated, in order to be fairly and rightly judged, they must be judged by • careful and exact examination of documents, and au amount of attention must be given to them which certainly he was not prepared to give at the present moment, nor would the house be prepared to listen when they had met for the transaction of other important business. Mr. DANBY SEYMOUR said he took it for granted that the flemetary for India would not go on with the European Forces (India) Bill until members had the report of the orminisation committee before them. Sir C. WOOD said he would not proceed with the bill at an inconvenient hour. saiT his hon. friend had asked a ques tion whether or not the right bon. gentleman would allow them to have the report of the committee on military orgs niaation before them before proceeding with this bill. This bill was the shortest that had been produced this session, sad was introduced at the shortest notice that bad ever been given on so important a bill. It was precisely the bill which, even if they were to pass it in the last week of the session, would be certain to be passed by the House of Lords. Under these circumstances, they had a right to ask that before they proceeded further with the bill they should have placed in their heads the papers and documents which were essential to the right understanding of the very im portant question to which it referred. Colonel sYK M remarked that the house was probably aware that the papers which he had moved for with re ' ward to the expenditure of the Horse Guards were not yet m the hands of members, Sir DE L. EVANS observed that he had given notice of • motion on the subject for to-morrow. The report wa■ then agreed to. LATE HOURS. On the motion that the Speaker leave the chair, in order that the house might go into committee of ways and Meat," NEWDEGATE moved that the rules against pro ceeding with opposed notion and orders afters quarter before 6 o'clock on Wednesdays, under the standing order of the 19th day of July, 18%, be applied to all business standing for evening sitting' upon which debate shall arise after 1 o'clock in the morning during the remainder of the session ; his object being to curtail in some degree the extraordi narily lengthy sittings of the house which had prevailed during the last few weeks. liar G. GREY admitted the importance uf the question, ea well as the stride which had been recently put on mem bers and officers of the house by the late lengthy sittings ; but he did not think it desirable to enact such a stringent order as that proposed, especially as there wag no analogy between sittings on ordinary days and Wednesday', when the house rose as a matter of course at six o'clock. It might result in putting a stop to business which required to be got through after one o clock at the option of any member who chose to state that he opposed it. It would lead to inconvenience and obstruction of public business, especially at the end of the session. A discussion followed, in the course of which Mr. Sou• eerie complained of the rule of the Lords not to receive bills from that house after a certain date ; Mr. Disraeli out reeled that the government should now make up their minds es to what minaures they meant to carry this year, and in which opinion Lord Palmerston concurred, and mid that the government would take that matter into their consideration, and state the result on an early day. The mut ion was withdrawn. WAYS AND MEANS. - - The house then went into committee of ways and means. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER made his statement of the manner in which the government proposed to meet the expenditure voted in supply on account of the China war. In February, be observed, the provision made for the war was 650,000 f., to be charged upon the nuances of the year 1859-60, and double this amount upon thus/ of the year 1660-61, making together 2,500,0001., which was the whole provision the government proposed to make on account of the expedition to China before they knew that we should have to conduct warlike opera tions. The vote woe increased by other items. The whole of the charges for the expedition to China up to the present period, so far as the government had cognisance of them, amounted to 5,400,000!., to which must be added 450,0001. due on account of the former war. The whole of the 850,000/. charged upon the finances of 1859-60 had been paid out of the produce of the taxes, the revenue of the year having been so productive. But, although the con dition of the revenue up to the close of June was eminently satisfactory, and even exceeded the expectations of the government, he did not recommend any interference with the estimate of the revenue he had made in Fecruary. He then proceeded to state the mode in which the government proposed to provide for the recent vote at 3,800,000 f. Taking the 500,000/. included iu the provision in February, together with the surplus of revenue, then estimated at 461,00 W., but which was reduced by errors and miicalcula tions to 264,000/o, and 700,000 f. the produce of the paper duty available for the financial year (if it should please the House of Commons that the duty should be levied), these three items would amount to 1,464,01101. Deducting this sum from 3,800,0001., there remained to be provided for 2.336,000 f., which the . government asked the committee to be authorised to ra ise partly by taxation and partly by other means. They proposed to obtain the sum of 1,000,0001. by an additional duty upon ardent spirits of 11d. per gallon on the various descriptions charged I under the Excise and Customs. The effect would be to raise the duty on British spirits to its, per gallon, on colonial spirits to 10s. 2d. and on foreign spirits to 10s. sd. He explained at some length the reasons which bad weighed with the government iu making this addition to the spirit duties (which would be permanent), and why they considered it practicable and timely, and likely to produce the results they anticipated. He was aware, he said, that there were special circumstermes which occasioned some uncertainty in the odenlatian of the produce of the duty, and it would be necessary to be company the augmentation with some modfficatioe of the duty on wine, and he had therefore assinwed as addition of only 1,080,0001. to the revenue of the ensaelel . This would reduce the sum of 2,336,0001. to 1,286, . • and that sum it was proposed to provide for out of the b alances in the exchequer, which would adroit of the withdrawal of even 2,01.10.001.11. It would be his duty to ask the committee for an immediate vote, in order to secure the change of the duty on the commodity ; and he added that it was not the intention of the government to make any further demand upon the taxation of the country on account of fortifications, the subject of which would be brought before the house on a future day. A conversational discussion followed, in the course of which, Lord FERMOY complained of the Chancellor of the Exchequer's availing himself of the paper duty panted him by the Lords, which presented a difficulty in the way of settling the question of privilege between the two houses. The resolutions were then agreed to ; as were resolutions imposin3 an excise on all persons deal ing in foreign wines and spirits in bond ; reduc in the period of the malt duty credit; chenging the time of psyment of the hop duty ; imposing a duty of 3s. a cot, on home-;rows chioory until March, lsBl , sod 6s. afterwards; imposing stamp &Aide ou rosining notes, assignment of leases exceeding terms of 35 years, on acci• dental death insurances, and on foreign promissory notes. The hones then resumed. BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY BILL. The house then, in committee , resumed the consideration d the clauses of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Bill. A large portion of the discussion was engrossed by the 1152nd clause, abolishing the distinction between traders and ace-traders, it being objected that, considering the arta which by the bill would authorise an adjudication in bank ruptcy and its consequences, the clause would operate with =nive severity upon non-traders without store safeguards ee provided by the bill ; and Mr. HENLEY moved an amendment, the effect of which was to limit the bill to traders. Before the discussion of the clause terminated, the chair , man was ordered to report progress. Upon the report, in a conversation as to the principle of comprehending non-traders in the bill, The ATTORNEY•GENERAL said he vnu not bound to the Tri r k i t e EYRESHMENT HOUSES AND WINE LICENSES (IRELAND) BILL. l On , the order for going into committee upon the above til Mr. HENNESSY, urging various objections to the bill, moved to defer the committee for three months. This motion was seconded by Colonel iii:;;;;: Lord J. MANNERS, adverting to what had been said upon Mr. Newdegate's motion in the early part of the even ing, objected to the government bringing forward such a question for discussion at so late an hour, and moved that as debate be adjourned. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER justified his proceeding with the bill, and the motion for the adjourn ment of the debate being negatived, the house divided upon Mr. Hennessy's amendment, which was negatived by 136 to 38. The house then went into committee upon the bill, but the chairman was soon onlered to report progress. The Prisons (Scotland) Bill weed the committee ; other bills were also forwarded, and the remaining business having been disposed of, the house adjourned at three o'clock. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. WESTERN ClRClllT.—VtrlNcavrtza, JULY 16. CILOW/I Couts.—(Before Mr. Justice Keating.) MURDER AT GOSPORT. f irhael Hynes, • soldier, aged 32, was indicted for the wilful murder of Anne Shein. Mr. Poulden and Mr. Beetham prosecuted ; Mr. W. M. Cooke defended the prisoner'. The prisoner, a fine.looking man, was a sergeant in the 16th Regiment of Foot, . stationed at Aldershott, and in March, being on furlough, he went with one of his children to the house of his father-in-law, John Clark, a waterman residing in Chapman's-yard, • passage leading from the High street, at Gosport. A few months ago he received an injury to his head on board the Himalaya, and since then was much affected by drink. On the 9th of March he was out drinking with some soldiers of the Enryalus, oext with Clark, and he eventually returned home much intoxicated : he would not be quiet, many angry words ensued, and the disturbance was so great that the neighbours came in to endeavour to quell it, including the deceased, who was a woman 64 years of age. Mrs. Shein tried to pacify him, when he forced Mrs. Clark out of the room, locked the door, and he was then seen by • person who looked through the window hocking with his drawn sword something upon the floor. He ran from the house when further assistance arrived, his sword and clothes covered with blood, flourished the sword in the dark passage until Clark obtained • poker, and then, with the assistance of others, he was disarmed, secured, sod handed over to the police. Mrs. Shein was found lying upon the floor, her skull fractured, and with many dreadful wounds upon her head and body. Dr. Rundle and Mr. Warlle the surgeon, found that she bad received two pa gashes on the temple, respectively three and four inches long, reaching to the now ; • third cut, three inches in length, on the left temple ; a cut beneath the left eye ; • serious jagged fracture of the skull ; two cuts on the left arm, and some minor wounds and bruises. These shocking injuries caused inflammation. The inflammation was fol lowed by an abscess on the brain ,• in consequence of the abeam, paralysis ensued, and at the termination of a few weeks the unfortunate woman died. . _ Mr. Cooke, in an eloquent address to the jury, urged that there was uo previous malice on the part of the prisoner, and that the wounds were inflicted by - him when he was in a state of temporary rrental derangement, in consequence of drinking, he being previously a sober well-conducted man. Colonel Peacock, Captain Healy, and Lieutenant Le Fenore, who had known the prisoner from 14 to 5 years re spectively, gave him an excellent character. Mr. Justice Keating having summed up, The jury, after a lengthened deliberation, found the pri soner Guilty, with the strongest possible recommendation to mercy. His lordship then assumed the black cap, and passed sen tence of death in the usual form. The prisoner appeared much prostrated on hearing the awful sentence of the law, and be had to be assisted from the bar. THE POLICE COURTS. David Weaves Johan' was further examined, charged with publishing a libel upou Sir James Fergusson, P. for Ayrshire. Mr. Humphreys, jun., appeared for the prosecution, and stated that he was now in a position to prove the publica tion of three distinct libels. Firstly, the publication of certain verses (referred to on the first examination) to Cap taM Hill, Governor of the House of Detention, and also to Jody Fergusson ; secondly, the publication of another libel to Mr. Disraeli, and the publication of a third libel to Mr. Honruan. It wee not absolutely necessary in law to dis prove • libel, lint he would state that ha should can Sir James F to prove that there was not the slightest truth in what the defendant had said, and he would also call Lord Arthur Hay, Assistant Adjutant-General in the Crimea, to speak to Sir James's conduct there. Mr. Arnold did not see the necessity of doing so. Mr. Humphrer observed that he merely publicly stated it in ceder that it might be known that the defendant had said and written what was wholly false. He would call Lady Edith Ferguson), Mr. Disraeli, M.P., and Mr. Horemen, M.P., and Captain Hill, to prove the various libels. Captain Frederick William Hill, governor of the House of Detention, was then called, and identified an envelope and paper addressed to Lady Fergusson, at 27, Chatham street. The paper was headed, " Song dedicated to Lady Ferguson, and to be screamed six weeks hence through all the streets of London. Tune, ' Have you heard of a jolly young waterman r " and contained a number of venni of • most low and scurrilous description, inipulMg gross cowardice to Sir James Ferguesoe while in the trenches be fore Sebastopol, and corrupt motive, to Mr. Paynter, the magistrate, by whom Mr. Jolson bad been committed for bending • threatening letter to Sir James, one of the figura ' Live expressions used being " buying a beak." Captain Hill then repeated at length what in substance has been already detailed in his information on oath pre viously published, that as governor of the gaol the envelope and song were brought to him froe prisoner while under imaffnement there upon the charge of threatening Sir James, when he restored them to the accused, stating that be could not forward them. Mr. Jobson pressed him to let them "O as directed, and mid he did not see why they should not be sent. Witness replied that he would not permit this packet to be sent, us the content, were most offensive, particularly am being addressed to • lady, adding, that whatever differ ence might exist between him (Mr. Jolson) and Sir James Ferguson, his lady ought not to be included in it. Witness had no hesitation in saying that the sung and envelope were both in the accused'. handwriting. Had seen a great deal of it. Mr. Arnold wee of opinion that this was not • publication of the libel to Captain Hill, as be had not received it from the defeudatit. it merely coming under his eogunance in the course of his duty as governor of the gaol. Mr. Humphreys differed with his worship, but said he would endeavour to supply the defect by producing the warder to whom the accused gave the letter. Mr. Jobson questioned the witness at some length to show that all atters written by prisoners were inspected by him or his deputy before they were allowed to be sent out se directed, and having received an answer in the afErmative, contended that as a prisoner had no alternative, it was an involuatuy publication of anything he wrote. Mr. Job son then inquired whether the governor bad not re ceived a letter from him since his release from custody? The governor replied that he had, and gave the pur- port, which was that lie had lost the letter and song a/luiled to, amongst other papers, out of his pocket, and that he would be obliged to Captain Hill, if it fell into his hands, to forward it to Lim, as, upon consideration, he was glad the communication was not sent, as it contained severe redactions upon Mr. Pander, the magi which he should not now like to publish, as Mr. Payn strate, ter seemed di z to act fairly towards him. Cy d Edith Fergueson was then called, and was about to be sworn, when — The accused said he objected to her giving evidence, as it was contrary to our law for a lady to interfere in • pro secution in which Ler husband was concerned. Mr. Arnold informed him that he WAS quite mistaken in his view of the English law. The lady was a competent witness for the crown. . . . . Lady Fergussoo then stated that she received the packet or envelope and song produced by post, at 27, Cheehatn.. street, on the 19th of June. The original envelope containing the song hal boon en. cloned in another, and upon the latter being shown to tale Hill he said he did not think it was the • handwriting. Mr. Jolson put some irrelevant questions to her ladyeftip. and was stopped by the magistrate. Mr. Arnold then remarked that he must repeat then we no evidence of publication of the libel to Captain Hill. nee the slightest of the publication of it by the Accueed to Ledy Fergueion, Mr. Humplirove urged that the libel was in the accused's handwriting, and was published in being scut through the poet. He had no doubt lie should be able to ptodoce cams so chow that such had been held to be publication by the writer. After some further legal discussion, renewed at the close of the case, The Right Ron. Benjamin Disraeli, M.P. Grervenor gate, Park-lane, was then called, and said—ina the 2nd of June lag I received • this letter and envelope, !narked " F. G." Defendant—Have you been morn accordbxg to your creed? -- Witness— Certainly. Defendant—How is you were not sworn according to the Jewish persuasion, with your hat on! Witness—l am a Christian, as you know and therefore do not put my bat on while taking the oath: Mr. Humphreys bore objected to the right hon. gentle man being insulted. Defendant (to Mr. Disraelij—Have you not, since the removal of the Jewish disabilities, returned to Abraham's bosom! . . Mr. Arnold mid he really must put a stop to such ques tions ;it was too late to ask them now. If the defendant had wished to question the validity of the oath the witness had taken he should have done so sooner. Defendant—Then I will put this question to the witness. Do you consider the oath you have just taken binding upon your conscience? Witness—l do. _ . . Defendant—That is sufficient ; under those circumstances it matters not whether you have abandoned or adhere to your ancient faith. One more question. When you receive • communication on parliamentary business, asking you to discharge • duty, or undertake anything connected with that duty as a representative in parliament, do you consider yourself justified in showing that communication to the party implicated? - Witness —lt depends upon the character of the person from whom each communication is received. In the pre sent instance the parson who wrote this letter had been in the habit of seng me letters, some of a threatening character, some of a scurrilous chara...-ter, all of a most ab surd cha racter, and I, therefore, under the circumstances, thought it proper to give the communication to the person most interested in it, and accordingly gave it to Sir James Ferguseon Defendant—May I ask to whom you just now referred as the person writing the letters Z N 1 ituess—To yourself. Defendant—You are getting exceedingly scurrilous in your remarks. Mr. Arnold—Be quiet, sir. You Lave brought a very proper rebuke upon yourself. Mr. Humphreys—Have you any more questions to put to the witness ? Defewdant—l could put many more, but am not allowed. (To witness.) Have you ever written to me in answer to my letters? Witness—Never. My secretary may have acknowledged the receipt of any communication sent. Defendant—Did you not write to me while in New York, thanking me for cutting up Lord Palmerston in the Fir York liepalican &Tirol Witness (with a smile)— I never did. Defendant—Now, be caution', for I have letters at home with the Exchequer seal upon them, which may be fetched in half an hour. Do you persist in saying you have never written such letters to me? Witness---I never wrote to you in my life. Defendant—Have you never authorised your secretary to write to me? _ _ *itnes;Never. I never authorised any one to write ; but it is possible secretaries may have acknowledged the receipt of your letters. Defendant—lt is not likely your secretary would, upon his own responsibility, have written to thank me for cutting up Lord Palmerston. Is not your reason for coining here against me my having written long and biting articles upon yourself Witness—Not that I am aware of. I only know your name by yqur having written various letters to me. Defendant was then putting another offensive and imper tinent question to the right hon. gentleman, when Mr. Arnold again saul he must put a stop to such questions. Defendant then wished to know what Mr. Disraeli was called to prove, and what the charge against him was, for be could not see the object of the evidence that was now being offered. Mr. Arnold said the present charge against him was send ing a letter to Mr. Disraeli containing a libel on Sir James Fergusson, and Mr. Disraeli had been called to prove the receipt of that letter. Defendant asked whether the previous charge of writing the verses had been abandoned? Mr. Arnold replied it had not. Defendant complained that he was totally unprepared for this charge. He thought the charge against hini was publishing a libel in the verses, and that Mr. Disraeli had been called to prove finding the verses in the street ; and such, on reference to his commitment, would be found to be the charge on which he had been remanded. Mr. Arnold intimated that since the last hearing two other charges of libel had been preferred against him. Defendant protested against say charge being brought against him without his being communicated with upon the subject. Mr. Arnold informed him it was not at all necessary to adopt such a course. Defendant repeated that these charges bad been brought upon him in an unexpected way ; he therefore felt himself entitled to a little latitude in asking questions of the wit ness'''. Yr. Arnold said he might ask anything pertinent to the cue, but must not travel into matters quite foreign to the question. Defendant said, then he would ask whether the sending a letter to any person in parliament, asking him to discharge his duty by inquiring into another one • conduct, was im proper . Arnold replied—Certainly, if the letter contained a libel. . . The letter sent to Mr. Disraeli having been identified by Captain Hill as Iring in the defendants handwriting, the parts containing the alleged libel were read. After some conversation, Mr. Humphreys called The Right Hon. Edward Horsman, M.P., Richmond terrace, who said—On the 11th of Juno I received the en velope and letter produced, marked "H. I. J." I pee it to my secretary, whom I directed to answer it, and it sou afterwards forwarded to Sir James Fergusra Cross-examined by defendant—l am conceeted with the Camperdown family by marriage. lam aware you after. wards called. When f saw Sir James was before that. The question put to Mr. Disraeli was here repeated, and the right hon. gentleman answered—Sir James had told me that he had been very much annoyed by the writer of this letter (the one I hold in me hand), and under those cir cumstances I did consider it 'air to hand your communica tion to him. Mr. Henry Robinson, S, Manchester-bulldinp, was then called and said—l am secretary to Mr. Muumuus. In the third or fourth week in June defendant called with respect to the letter Mr. Horsman produces, and asked ins whether I had answered hie communication, to which I replied in the affirnuttive. He then desired me to tell Mr. Horsman that he (defendant) would not have troubled him upon the subject hart be been aware that he was connected with the Campertlown In answer to a further question from Mr. Humphreys, as to whether Jobson had admitted writing the letter, witness replied that it was inferred they were speaking about a letter which he had himself written. Captain Hill having again been called to prove that the letter addressed to Mr. Horsman was written by the de fendant, the portion containing the alleged libel on Sir James Fergosson was read. This concluding the evidence, a very lengthened legal ar gument occurred, in the course of which 31r. Arnold thought the larguage in the last letter relating to Sir James exces sively weak compared with the &bums levelled at everybody else, and observed that it was a question for consider'. tion if a man went to a member of parliament complaining of wrong, and soliciting him to take up his case with a view of redressing it, whether it was not a privileged communi cation. This oomplaiut involved a certain amount of detail, and it was in explanation that language which certainly could not be justified was used, Mr. Humphreys 'quested that if there had only Seen one letter sent avowedly for the purpose of seeking redress, much would not, perhaps, have been thought of it, but this was not an isolated case, and without the slightest founds lion for such aspersions defendant was libelling Sir James in every direction. Mr. Arnold pointed out that the law now gave Mr. Hum phreys the opportunity of ulna before a judge, who would take the whole scope of the matter into consideration, sad that coupe. Mr. Humphrey* hoped, in the event of his producing the warder required from the House of Detention, the magi strate would consider a sufficient cane made out to send the whole of the charges before another tribunal, where the judge would determine the point of law in question. Defendant declared he had not been guilty of publishing any libel. Letters were all inspected by the prison officers, as was well known. Mr. Arnold replied that if a man knew that, and sent libellous matter that war, he published it. An assertion of a grievance was a very different thing to an imputation of cowardice, which no man had a right to make against another. _ . . --•• Some further argument occurred, in which Mr. Hum phreyibaaid that in indicting the amused. there would be • count charging him with writing as well as publishing a libel, a•d bwthought both indietmenta could be sustained. Mr. Arnold said he would conoder the matter ; and de fendant was remanded fur a x erk, stating that be was unable to tind the boil, small as it is in amount, required. EXPREI 1860. SOUTHWARK. Chnries Bliss, a well-dressed man, a native of Holland, melding at the Sussex Hotel, Duke-street, London-loidge, was charged with being concerned with another in stealing from No. 86, Stamford-street, aix thousand yards of silk plash, value near 2,0001. Mr. Sleigh said Mr. Gilley, the prosecutor, was a French plush merchant, carrying on business ►t No. $6. Stamford street, where he generally kept a very large stock. A short time ago he bad to go to the continent owing to the death of a relative, when he left a clerk named Woollies in charge of his business until his return. When that took place he found that Woollies had absconded, and that previo s to doing so he had stolen silk plush worth near ' 0001., and had sold it to a person iu the city for 1,100/., whose name at present, fur the sake of the ends of justice, he declined to mention. From Information the prosecutor received be made inquiries, and ascertained that the prisoner had carried on business as a conunission agent at Saltere-hall, where he had only a tab!e and two chairs, and there they both concocted the robber• and arranged for the sale of the stoke property. As soon as Mr. Millet found out where !Import& i Denverd. Pr. Stack, 18153. SUGAR7Iyegt * Ws Bengal and Madras bags Penang Foreign Pke Corna—W.l MS. Mocha pkga Ceylon baP COO .A bags Foreign bags RCY—W.L casks 2,919 4,262 16,276 10.740 9,300 11,300 1119,493 793:4 6,261 10,929 90.100 116,831 9,593 7,348 861,907 577.270 244 6 707 481 174 108 3,861 3,671 6,889 2,887 26,109 40,096 696 314 11,217 11,315 774 1.871 0,623 4,143 1,041 1,267 , 36,827 33,813 TALLOW.—The tallow market remains steady, with a good trade demand for consumption. Speculatively not much has been doing for some days, but prices are fairly maintained. From Petersbuith a eL 4 7ket is quoted 50) rs. on spot, and 49a August. , 351 to 11.16. Our quotations are :—Spot, Y. C., 525. . ; Clocine, sda. ; August and September, 53. 9d. ; October to Decender, 525. 6d. : separate months, 525. 9d. ; January to March, 535. There is still a small supply of Town tallow nt net cash. The market is almost clear of " sorts"—Ws. is offered for fine Ist pipes of South American landing. Coooanut oil : Cochin, 475. ; Ceylon, 46e. ; palm oil, 455. to 455. 10d. ; rough fat, 21. 9id.—(From the circular of Maur,. Smith and Charles, dated Monday evening.) COTTON.—LIVERPOOL, JULY 16. —The sales of cotton today are estimated at 8,000 bales. A quiet market, atthe prices of Friday last. CATTLE.—Lrvoiroot, Jun' 16.—The supply toolay is less than last Monday. The demand slow for beef, without change in prices of the best. Middling stock rather lower. lambs sold higher. Sheep without change. COALS.—LCMDON. JULY 16.—Davison's Wert Hartley, 15a. • Holywe ll , 15s. 6d ; lambert's West Hartley, 15s. 4d. ; TanEeld Moor Butes, 13s. ; West Hartley, 166. ; Wylam, 15e. 6d. ; Walls End Acorn Close, 17s. ; Walls End. Eden, 17s. • Eden Maw , 17s. ; Walls End Framwell. gate, 17s. ; Well; End Helton, 18s. 9d. ; Walls End South Hatton, 18s. 9d. ; Walls End Hough Hall, 17s. ; Walls End Thorpe, 17s. 9d. ; Camay and Darya lilting, 6d.—&ips at market, 24 ; sold, 22. his stolen property had been disposed of by his dishonest clerk, the purchaser had the audacity to ear that he pur chased it at a fair price, and set Mr. thiley at defiance. He should be able to prove all those facts, as the prisoner was seen with Woulliez in disposing of the property. Mr. Combs asked whether the matter had not been in. vertigated in another court! Mr. Sleigh said that as far as the felony was concerned this was the initiative. An action had been brought in the Common Pleas in the City of London, by Mr. Gilley, the present prosecutor, against Mr. Hart, to recover the pro perty purchased of Nt miller, and the prisoner was called as a witness. The prisoner was then known to have assisted in the robbery, but the prosecutor deferred prtssing the charge against him until after the trial. After some further evidence, Mr. Combo told the prisoner he must be remanded for a week, but he would accept hail, himself in 1,000/., and two securities in 500/. each, for his appearance. Bail not being forthcoming, he was removed in the van to Horseniouger-lane Gaol HAMMERSMITH. His Royal Highness Princelcisraniof Saxe Weimar at. tended to answer the summons of Mr. Willing, the lessee of the Kensington turnpike trust, for unlawfully paming through the Kensington gate with a chaise drawn by One horse without paying the toll. James Fawcett, a collector at the Kensington gate, stated that on Saturday, the 30th ult., his royal highness drove up in a four-wheel chaise with one horse, and upon witness de manding 3d. toll, he pleaded as an exemption that he was going on duty as as officer in her Majesty's service. His royal highness was dressed in uniform, but it was the prac. tice of a7l officers in her Majesty's service to pay the toll when driving in their private Vehicles. His royal highness, to answer to the case, said he claimed exemption under the Mutiny Act passed this year. He was on his way to Kensington barracks on duty, and therefore he claimed the exemption. Mr. Ingham said he thought the exemption did not apply to carriages unless belonging to her Majesty, or employed in her service. If his royal highness had been riding on horse back then the question might have been a different one. His royal highness was then ordered to pay 3d., the toll, and 3. costs. MARKETS. LONDON WEEKLY DOCK RETURNS.-JITLY 14. TRAFFIC RETURNS. 11.011.11•Yl. NW, Pr Mr Teta/. Tatni orn. mar rupltea ISA. Week ending June 28 Detrultand 11ileuukee.... IBS I AM 1.096 2,4 91 2,370 Week eliding June 29. Omt Western .4 Canada 313 3.332 2,199 6.061 6.360 Week ending July la. South Eastern London. Brighton, and S Coast 223 4, 10.649 3.310 19,359 17,330 - 29,Z ,Z 4 DESPATCH OP AMERICAN AND CANADIAN MAILS. —Letters, dc., will be received at the Liverpool Port-office, to be forwarded by the Quebec and Montreal mall Wainer lkihemian, via Galway, to-morrow (Wednesday) till 9.30 p.m., with a late fee of ld. till 10 cm., and with a late fee of 3. until 10.15 ctn. Letters will also be received at the Liverpool Post-office for the mall steamer City of Wash. initen, till 10.15 a.m., and 10.30 a.m. THE LIVERPOOL POMO:CIRO CA/M.—LIVERPOOL, MONDAT.—Tbomos Winslow. the prisoner charged with the administration of antimony and thereby poisoning four per sons, was spin brought before the stipendiary magistrate to-day, when Mr. Aspinall (barrister), who appeared for the prosecution, requested that a further remand should take place. It had been found necessary to go into very ex- Waive analyses, which were at present in course of being perfected by Dr. Taylor sod other gentlemen, local an well as metropolitan, and which would, doubtless, in the end tend very much to elucidate the truth with regard to this most serious and distressing ease. It had been found im possible to complete these analyses in time for the adjourn• meat of to-day, and it was so obvious that it would tend to the ends of justice that they should be completed before the investigation took place —more particularly as the prisoner's libertj was not a ff ected by the delay—that it occurred to him (Mr. Aspinall) as very desirable to have a further remand. Mr. Raffles granted a remand for seven days. . • .• DIAMONim IN AVSTBALIA.—An interesting dis covery, namely, the existence of native diamonds, has been made. The stone was discovered in the black semi of the Ovens district by an Irish miner, named O'Neill. Rubies and other gems of very small size had previously been found in the same deposit.—Ausirafian aid New Zealand 04:etle. [Advertisement.)--HouowAY's PILL& -BiIiOUR DM. NMI-WA 14 the Liver.—After the long-continued wet weather, the hot summer's sun will cause the atmosphere to 110 surcharged a Ith deleterious exhalations, which will prodnee fevers and Irritation of the bowels. To check the undue action of the Over, usually the ti rot intlimitiou of febrile complaint., the Pills Invented by Professor Holloway stand unrivalkil. These Pills are so cheaply easily purchased that none need suffer from nausea, in digestion, disordered liver, liminess, or torpid Towels —or, in a word, from any functional Irregularity. These Pills produoe a happier effect on the digestive organs thin any other medicinal compound, whether mineral or vegetable. by their means any person can easily secure robust health. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. ALLEN.—JuIy 11, at the Vicarage, Brinsop, near Herefonl, the wife of the Rev. W. T. Mien, of • son. BROWN.—..JuIy 12, at Hampstead, the wife of Dr. Drown, of twins, son and daughter. COTTON.—JuIy 12, at Boutlisea, Hants, the wife of C. W. Cotton, lay., of a son: Co3s.—Jely 12, at Watford, Reds, the wife of the Bea. F. Cox, - . of a wn. JAHaH --July 12, at Hatton, Buena, the wife of J. James, Esq., NICOLSON.—JuIy 12, at William-street. Llwn4lesomare, the wife of Captain Sir F. Nicohon. Bart., of a daughter. PHELPS. —July 12, at itonekion, near Dorchester, the wife of J. It Phelps. Nag., of a son. 111C11.—July 1!, at Nottingham-plate. Regent's park, the w ife of Mr C. H. J. Bich, Bart, of • daughter. 81114EBLAND.—July 14, at Chase Bowe, Lavender-MU, Surrey, the wife of W. P. Sutherland, Ely , of a son . TBEMENBIBULL--July 12, at Bean-atrnet, Park4Ant, Mrs. it. S. Tremenheere, of a daughter. MAB.RUGES. MOFFAT—ENOWLES.—JuIy 12, at the parish church of the Holy Trinity, Southampton, by the Rev. A. B. Burton, M.A., Mr. J. D. Moffat, of Benenden, Kent, to Miss Leah Knowles, daughter of Mr. T. Knowles, of !Double. Hants. NRVILL—MACLEAN —July 12. at Greet Mar) lebone Church. the Rev..l. Mershon, the Hon. R. P. Nevin, son of the Lot ofAbergaseuny, to Louisa Marianne, daughter of Mr C. F. Maclean, Bast OTWAY—SWAPPIRLD.—JuIy 1!, at Leamington Priors, by the Rev. P. Roberts, }Award, eon of the late Admiral Sir R. W. Otway, Bert., 0.C.8., to Adelaide, daughter of R. H. gwatheld, Esq., of Weetdown Lodge, Doreetehne. ROWCROFT—SOUPER.—JuIy 12, at Leigh. Worcestershire, by the Rev. J. P. Parker, 0. C. Rowcroft, 11 M.'s Den gel Army, t.. °whine Rachel, daughter of P. D. Beeper, Ray., IL SL's Lull icervioe. Magritte.. Slit ITH—IIMSARD —July It at the Church of the Holy Tri nity. Brompton, by the Rev. A. Hitchin., Mr. J. C. Saab. ti Rebecca daughter of J. Haesard, req., of Seyniour.plari, West Brompton. DEATHS. ------ ALLFREV.—JuIy 13, at Ilemingford House, Stratfordoon•Avon, Adeline Margaret, daughter .of K. W. AllirrY. Esq.. aged 13. BEVAN.—JuIy 13, from acute Itroischitis, aged 43, Emily Passey. wife of Mr. John C. D. Bevan, of No. 1, Bynn.phoce, leasing nine children to mourn the loss of a moot devoted another CUTLY.IL—JuIy 11, at notching, Susses, Ellen Mary, wife of Mr. W. Cutler, aged 41. HAWLEY.—JuIy 11. at Aberdeen-park, Highlonry, A. Hawley. Esq aged 56. Ella HENDERSON —July 14, at Churchorood, Wavertree, Laurie. daughter of Mr. Henderson. PARK ES.—July 13, nirahegh, wife of Mr. W. Parkes. of BpoughtOnoroad. Salford, seed 43. WHITLLOCKL—JuIy 1. at Utile Katharine's, Tunbridge. Maria, only surviving daughter of the late John White locks, Pao., In her enth year. Printed and Published by Itrattan KING HALM of No. B. lralientrott, in the City of London. Printer. at the 01Tiee, totomWird-street. in the Precinct ut itICIDAY, JULY IL WOO. A I