The Express. — London, England, 1850-11-20 00:00:00

p a . ot he h b , o ttlt! r • f ▪ s -f , k°ll 10P 41▪ 1 .,,,1 rea , m orti , r o e t , to 10 01". ; s ip! e ▪ el‘s o pt. ' " rl car" ▪ •"7 • • er es • lb , ▪ : ' • Ear , j▪ e g.:)1 0 ; 21 , e • e n g, ,tit 4 it! .v'p r• • GI to 1 1 It • . 1° ' ' lc I . 0. . • to O . I 1114:a• 7t. la C• L. a , n . I. It :us.. r t• •, •tp• le . pay • C Illaa tl.r aC! te'v 44 a. b•a, t I •It t • • r to I. , I lca trSul I. nt I. .1 1:. 1. • ce, t• 1.0 t • kok n 1 1?.1 r our. rev a ta It 7.01 prat VIM l ail 14.1 toi L • I a.: I; a • J , di r CI tI 2 THE EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 20, 1850. t , t , 1 eyee ssesealier•is-chief, or governor eta whisk , during the *kw si gimi gum, 1 5 „ or b aa l " m t ee . eel r i gs is bolted to obey that person is while to look Inhe as t e rfigh - jUllerg e • gi ft florP'' -- • lie to his office, and any ogle would qaire--". Have the eldeled. se else , the 14 % 4 !"r e c ' ee ne r s ee e Bet is regard to • high's it le ley et the land ? Illf sat, teby Arabi they boding, sette e— ' , f re re. Precisely is thole very matters which vainly abused / " Ma a l te -- ince we are not bound to obey him. No Is at Wars the Muesli el llesimeil is ss 1e be •" -- ° k doctrine from his teething, windier attached %Li s % 4 1 s e a thessmenst die WWI. ant ate pew etar01_ : .,.. 1. " 1 ,; 5 5 55 . or grace from his blerning. This rides ese ? Web this pest eel added e rsd owise Asa b, .....„„•"- .isee from the circuantsege that the et dm Anglican slew in their dereeededese. rids I y a n•- " -- ...; * .ii d military officers lows from the reply-fina that eves WINS Id - llie lomediofte MN 001 1.”0" at i t / 55 . - e - sebel none may impugn while that setholic bishops were seetraiied fleds edd! dis . euel* t he .coral a 'l ei & h m enon• erns premeds from the spiritual held by the Anginas, tale seildedde wee Mat fees lei et er. . 1 .7h0a may be, end is, lawfully denied. supposed to give the Wiliest eseestty le die English sivedb. c , • - • , 1 ., . n eer i'enii a the royal supremacy (always Speaking of it, the Duke ef Wellington rerauked that •• b. tpti .. - ; - es the potential or ecclesiastical jurtadioe (restrienve) 'Lassa was no seenrity, hat it would give eats. . t h e 555 en), he substitute', initials, foe it Maks to the united thumb of England and belled. tibutrd.toonty ; 5 5 , 5 e synod, or c senesce ;or he According to the laws of England the title of a diegetilli ~ r ' ,.. l e D ther ' to take its place. But when the oath, belonged to persons appointed to it by his Majesty; bat Is 0, In other b.causs he believes another and a tress wag desirable that others appointed to it by an waged' 1 5 ,,r.,j ' el ivied rupremse, to reside in the Pope, authority should be discountenanced, end that was tag , l - t ' 'P e over the entire eathoin church. With reason why the clause wag introduced. Thie was one of the' '. sietst"l'e;olre themselves into one ; denial et the lesaanoss which showed hoer difficult it was to legislate opal two- r sr ,f assertion of the pspal ',optionally. Led this subject at all. Re was aware that this chute gave ea 'l ,. fie , l, lawn for him to deny the oefi, se is it enmity to the established church, nor strengthened it is .- , T . ~,* t o e him to assert the other. Rises Lord any way, but it was i sorted to give satisfaction to them i l i s e - L ;. • shorst, is the House of Lords, May 11,1846, w eath ho • " olie tier disturbed by this assumption of title by VW th, 'olloeiog edge.. .gy. .3j e t it sass no crime in the Annan catholic to Even, timeline', our befog entrained from adopting Ile' : ...I n defend the supremacy of the Pope; but that if very titles, could give so security to the established church g p,.ar m40%1.' 0 ...1.'1 ) a ai and eifaoie vio ft immoral so that we may conclude that still less security would be d opinions, be was liable to punishment by the gives toit by our being forbidden to assume titles wide It : , 11 ::•; bar if he m• rely maintained sad defended, as are not theirs. The legislation on this subject 68A i m o nd to do. the spiritual authority of his superior, no besting on the security of the church of Eaglandr& 04055 h a wee guilt, of no offenos 'Saint the if we are to be considered guilty of so aggression against ~,,,, m any. Thee nett , res,read prelate ( the Bishop her, gad have to be dealt with by fresh penal legislaiun. .si had abet Lis opinfie and that of the learned for the purpose of propping her up, I do not see where as m the right or the MHIB aaalialliCa to maintain o can sto, cousisentl y , ort of frbiddng catholcs to ~.0 the tap , s sey of t he Popo is spiritual matters. y have u any bi s hops at t all. Ton cannot o make i • • law that they I, that it wee no offense at cagansoa law fi r them shall only be g dby viesmapoatelie, which wculd be Peri). acknowledging directly tho poges power in the reels i; in MI the enh r hand, if a..y persoa impro iv, re ',mai unit, called In easatios the supremacy (which the protestant bishops under oath cannot du); still no „ o f Et giami-esd that, it was to be observed, loss can you proceed to forbiddiag them to hags bishop ,5 etesesparel es well as the spiritual power el the of any sort, which would put them back into • worse eon __if ee ,.1, 55 , err improper motive or purpose, or Is anion than they were daring the operation of the penal t e , 5 .,,n r. ils,atueed that supremacy, then that laws. Any step backward is a trenching ou the complete ',„ Weal ,e liaqe i$ a pn.seciaPon at the common law ; toleration granted us. ~re r uln b. I, 1.14 .ersire.'m , ni%tesi t, i" the learned judges were con- 2. The appointment of a catholia hierarchy does not in nI. ikon wre any way deprive the English establishment of a single ad. ow reve ,,,, ‘ , ss n.st, it is of great itariortanas to vantage which it now poetesses. Its bishops retain, and, ice !hew easiest in mind For bath in the papers, anything that the new bishops will do, may reta.n for ever, . 5 5 ,,, e le slattern. it is almost assumed that their titles, their rank, their social position, their pre-emb• • E,... sow, fir the first time, denied the as- ewes, their domestic comforts, their salami, their lauds, their et A 5,,;,.. °idiom or impugned the spiritual iseomes, without diminution or alteration. Whatever sad, ,-c. of stn wan IN. Tee bishops sad clergy are, of halloo it has bees to you till now to see them so elevated ~,ec the tram to their own hest &dresser, sail above this, canna' rival. and to lays their wants so amply .. ri ' .. 1 rreiftil es with the rights of the eovereiss. provided for, you will still enjoy as much se hitherto. And ~,,,,,,oesnag, ant veil. endeavour to regain that the same is to be mil of the second order of clergy. Not . w ega they have 1.. t over the hearts of the people, an archdescoury, or deanery, or canonry, or benefice, or .... 1 ,„ p,,,hice, by sae horst of 'matinee, the ireligWas living, will be taken from them, or claimed by the catholis en alsich years say- wore away. Bat this will sot priesthood. The outward aspects of the two churches ~....: if no hi a people too moth esliabtesed as the will be the same. The eatholits epigeogney and the . • mired. , to leralloa, as enjoyed la England, to be catholic priesthood will remits no doubt poor, unnoteed by . ,; e• .l en, pri s sier' which it posenns. Tim toe great, and by the powerful (coo soon as the present man e . .,. e s o .in j e al o usy any attempt to curtail Or to motion stall have abided ), without e-eial rank or pre •: se, eves theseb Cathocs be the victim.. Bee eminence. If there be no security for the English chard .. t Ili. wend, the danger to the religious and in this overwhelming balance In its favour of wurldly ad. ..r on Magliihmes is not from any isfringensent es vantages, surely th e exclusion of catholic* from the parses u .., pis , ipe, greatly, to Bastian Catholics what I non of local sees will not save it. It really al:meant° be • ....ow sea they had tall right to obtain from him, wish on the part of the clerical agitators to make people be n :host whom takingadvantage of the occurrence livre that some tangible possessios of something solid is ..'.. • seep, dairy the ' is the fireidation of toleration, their respective sees has been bestowed upon th e sew 5 ewe, ham • hireelily of Englishmen, what at bishops; "something territorial." as it has oeen called. Time • entails them ia drill to the free mercies of will unmask the deceit, and show that not a,, inch of land or a shillirg of money has Dna taken from protestant* and given to catholics. 3. Nor is en attempt made to tUminish any of the morel and religious safeguards of that establishment which views our new measure with such wa•chial jealouey. Whatever that institution has possessed or done, to influence the people or attach its affections, it will still possess, and tney continsel to do. That clear, definite, and accordant teaching of tM doe rinse of their church, that familiarity of intercourse and ' 1 facility of access, that clove and personal mutual Egotist. ante, that face to tare knowledge of each other, that stn. donate confidence and warm sympathy, which form the truest, and strangest, and meet natural bred!' between. pastor and his flock, s bishop and his people, you will trail to the full, as much as you have d o e till sow. The new Walton will not have ennui= ID crust the path of the prelates of the Anglican sw tablishisent in their sphere of duty; they will find sleety 1 to do, besides their official du'ies, is attending to the wants of their pier spiritual children, especially the maid tudes of poor Irish whom peaceful and truly catholic con. duct, under the whirlwind of contumely which has just awaited them, proves that they have not forgotten the teaching of tbi it church-not to revile when reviled, and when they suffer, not to thrones. 4. But, is truth, when I read the frequent boasting of the papers and the exulting replies of bishops, that this move. client in the catholic church, instant cf weakening has strengthened the established church, by rousing the national ' protestantism, and awakening dormant sympathies for is ocelesias nal organiastmn, I cannot but wonder at the alarm which is ...peened. The late measure is ridiculed as I powerless, as effete, as tending only to the overthrow of ' popery in England. Then act on We conviction ; show that you believe in it; give us the little odds of a title, vehiu h ' bestews no power, rank, wealth, or influence, on him that heals it, and keep undisturbed those ether realities, and let the issue be tried on there terms, so much in your favour. Let it be a fair contention, with theologies! weapons and fair arguments. If you prevail, and aft °linty ie eatieguieiled la the island, it will be a victory without remnrie. It will I bare Ines achieved by the power of the Spirit, and not by the arm of Meth : it will prove your coin to be divine. But if, is spite of all your present advantage, our religion does advance, does win over to it the learned, the devout, and the charitable-does spread itself widely among the poor and simple-then you will not cheek its progress by for iddiog a catholic bishop to take the tide of Heaham or et Clifton. But it will be no doubt said, that m my who do not greatly sympathise with the establishment are indignant at the late meager, not because catholic, have obtained a hierarchy, but Lea ses its appointment is the work of the Pope. This interference of Home has aroused so much public feeling. Let us then inquire into this point. Sae' 111.-How COULD CATHOLICS OBTAIN TIMM 11111IABClaT ? hereon, to gamin*. is II —W lI‘T wa TWO SlTlflre . or 'Rummy. to- TO CATKOLICI ? Haire TROT • illonore o* • HIERARCHY ? r.tholic rmaneipation was considered, sot *sly •.an it betelited, bet by all who conmsted to it, pettiee, rather than if favour. It was deemed • taclade from fair puticipe•ion in constitutional Kaglishman as ammast of his religions opinion.. .:t ' therefore, preceded and followed by many lesser magnitude, the eatholies of the British • 'readmitted to complete toleratios, that le, were tree as say other elms of persist to protest and •ttrir religion in every respect. Thilaw made a few but the enumeration of these oily d to ta every other rev. et but them, the low emir ostsiminst. t' If the law," observed L .rd Lend. .• eliowed the doctrines and Medullae of the Boman :t .►oolo be allowed to be earned on perfectly and • , o lure told catholic; " You have perfect religious Lot you shill tilt teach that the church cannot err; tsra sr.moLts tulerstion, but you must not presume re baly orders to be a sacrament," would have been IT Jud tyrannical , L•d7 ord. rs moults bishops to administer them, con. .I, ...secession of bishops to keep up a succession of orders. _ - r A echnlie chores ia essentially episaopal ; and to .0 rotholies stall have complete religious toleration. • , ra.l rot bishops among you to govern you," h.ne been a completa contradiction in terms . it Ws am 'anted to a total (Nail of religious totem- a. there kre, emancipation was granted to catholic., •er .o given them to here an epiwpste, that a 1 ii.slops to role them, in communion with the Pops, ~.rd head of their church. e..eerreent by bhhope in the ceitho!ie church say I." kiad~. lap uvular, ordinary, proper, and prrfeet forma of r.I 'ornament consists of • local hierarchy. that is, of bishop. having their ages In the country, with as p similarly holding his see. Such is the 'pike°- . .re seas kneed in its ordinary form. t Where this proper form is not attaiaable, a tem ,uel lea perfect mode of providing bishops for a • adopted. The Pope names bishops to ancient sees new in infidel countries, as Turkey or Barbary, mid no jurisdiction in the a:matey to be provided for, ...,. immediate vicar,. Hence inch bishops are oaths' •• niai.tipstion or full religious freedom was granted if in this way included fall liberty to he governed • according to the constitatiou and ordinances of r en church, i• full as that they were at perfect liberty ,se it go d according to the regular and ordinary n .1 their eonsti• • ution, as much u by the temporary and r *kr . and that is bye hi by of local bishops. ,0 •..ee ..Id to t stholiee, " You are perfo Lily free to cti.e ywr notion, and to have your own church-goyim ; ter u o Anil not be free to have it in in. • proper to rt. ci ram, but on:y in the imperfect torn in which it iota fo!trated, teliile you bad not liberty of ooneeience," ' lyre been • t) runty, and, is fact, a denial of that We have seen the', not only we possess a full right, by law, to be goverued by bishops, bat that we have an moil right to be governed by them semeding to the proper and pretest farm of episcopal government, that is, by bishops ia ordinary, having their sees and titles in the country. If we have • perfect right to all this, we b.ve no less a per fect right to employ the only means by which to obtain it. We have sees tkat satholies en allowed by law to eosin tria the Pope's supremacy in ecclesiastical end relioiour matter; and one point of that supremacy is, that he alone can constitute • hi by or appoint bishops. Throughout the catholic world this is the same. Even where the oohs power, by en amegement with the Pope, name", that is propose, • person to be a bishop, ke cannot be consecrated without the Pope's coefirmatien or acceptance; and if cooserrated already, he can have no power w perform say functions of his office without the same sanction If therefore the catholic' of this country were ever to have • hierarchy at all, it could only be through the Pope. He alese meld grant it. This is no new or unknown e'octrine : it has long been thesilier to our statesmen, as well as to every one who has lathed catholic principles. Lord John Russell, in his speech in the Hones of Com. Moos, August 6,11146, thus fiensibly speaks rope the subj ect; —" Tome is another Offanee of introducing a Ball of the Pope into the country. The question is, whether it is de. "treble to keep up that, or any other penalty for suck ea °neer. It does not appear to me, that we ran possibly attempt to p' the introduction of the Pope's bulls into this country. There are certain bulls of the Pope which are absolutely necessary for the appointment of bishops and pastors belonging to the Roman catholic church. It would he quite impossible to Meant the introduction such bulls. ' 1 Lord Chancellor Lyndhurst; "They tolerated the ca thode prelates, end they know that these prelates could not cony on their church establishments, or etieduct its diked. phut, without holding communication with the Pope of Rome. No Roman catholic bishop could be created without the authority of a bull from the Pope of Rome ; and many of the obseresetre of their church required the seas ease. des. The moment, therefore, that they sanctioned the observance of the Roman catholic religion in this country, they by implication allowed the communication (with the Pope) prohibited by this statute, and for which it imposed ike peaelties of high treason. If the law allowed the elon trines and dicipline of the Roman catholic church, it should be permitted to be carried on perfectly and pro perly ; end that could not be without such conliesnice ties. On these grounds be proposed to repeal the mt.": (13'b Elie.) Three qaotations prove that in both houses of parliament the principle has been clearly laid down, that if catholic' ere to have bishops at all, the Pope, and the Pope 'Joao, ma make them for tram. Then it enters as completely fete the piaci lee of religious liberty th it the Pope eh old tease the hieresoby, as that catholic, should have the right to powers oree—s rieht as necessary for them, se is for the Wesleyan' thot of having conferences with superintendents . But it may be "aid, what induced the Pope to appoint this hierarchy now, sad in so sadden a meaner? For an answer to this question I mast refer you to my in troduction, is which you will ILA I trust, a satistactory one. Is. will see that the Pope has finally grouted now to aallhekie childnn in Rogleud what they had petlioned fee mail **deed three jean ago; and that if halt the attention WI been paid to our affairs then, which they receive now, lbe /labile would have known, all about it. I will only ripest whet I have there okeerved; that, in what bee beam done, the Pope has entirely acre 1, not only in meardases with the wishes, but at the earnest petition of his rises arstolic, and has seconded • warm dunes of the great body of catholic, in England. Let me then sum up briefly what I have proved thus far. I t meiotic. see not bound to A.?, or to consider es IWO bi.kaPs, those appointed by the crown, under the MIL mpg emissiastical supremacy, whic h legally they are not bowl r IL Calmar being ti a women fatly tolerated, and 011. *WI aeries% Many dtMMrene, which is epiempal, wet lumeisat. bishop** its sai a rT " lieus Is we law tile' forbids thentastes end w aleesillest• Ey' & Tlimtima le,Wwsalaary NeM110110,4•MIMOIMANI INN 41.01,m1 Mom t ls a .c I. They wen Oak "ewer te l at e llifs AMA; UIOD by se Mr hay sew 14 ok•se Aso.. h. nI of essemeileace. - the tat is a simple sad plain one, that the law did Dot ,a.”1•Ii.1 eat put oa say such restriction ; and as are b gurtnu4 h% law, sad not by ararthons. II tN oaths an at hth ny, by taw, Plats 'bishops at all, they ere ea It at is , ..rty to hate local bishops, as to hats views .v. wore than this, the law plainly foresaw, and provided Living regular hi.horm one day, instead of Thom. 1.. „s Lord Lyndhurst, &kited, gents d, has observed, law allowed the doctrines and th e discipline of the catholic: elmirch, it should be allowed to be carried it, ctly and properly." Tb's Is is the spirit of every icri•in. Our church system would sot be allowed to he rat net perfectly and properly, If it was undentnod ri ant expressed) that it was osly to be allowed to be d out in its imperfect and less proper forst. Suppose um Au kept possession for years of a bowie which he • built fir Inrush on my land, without my penis c, ar.• thin we come to an smimble arransement, and I him lion without any restriction, to bars a hours rn ; e old I complain, if, when his old one required ro Math r, LI" Ina& it of brkk or stone, sad say, that I always wit hr • on', to keep UP • Walden end temporary sae ? If sty sormaigs mated to any distant country Ita I, pi nilerer, and power to nth itself by a monarchical sormest, would it he )set, when that twin of jurisdiction to complain, and say that by thr concession • • Iv meant a peep. , sal erste ci regency, such as existed kap was theme ? Now, if esti:ohm at thin muss ; •144 I v. re allowed to band cep their church according to 'iaroteelly proper plan, which is episcopal, what right sus ,? hart to say," Yes, but it was meant that you should I tialkl it of temporary and imperfect materials, such as t Ele tniersted is you daring your oppresion sod each'. • " Lad thee, poverament of a church by vicars •" he is to its normal state jut what ari piney is to a • • rchy. • r.dly, the law did pat on a restriction. Them is as a a law, [Jai/fit) 1111111.1 est spfeassaio a/resins that fa, peitically is fide or deny the um of man particular • you thereby admit the lawful use of that wench Is sat To take the hastens* above gives : if I bad said, is at ' iteetsent with the householder that be might set la '.. lll tur tothe say sae of sandstone, this would hare Implied to lei& employ graph., or limed/me, oe at y ether me °ea eicluded N3W, d the law eetnaaselpatios • nP exelseinn end probibitios reepeetlog the titles t•I alt 1 , ..h0pa, it thereby permitted, sa perfectly whine 1.. oh .te.tr in that reepect cam. not under that azaptios. 71 . Art of Emancipation forbid. anyone from *mauled cc aun t the or till* of any bishopric of Sithtniltinprie of the t•lehlisted e 1 ,910111 in England or Ireland j In.. tti. it tile.. that they as allowed to mums say ether TO. of Leadoe bimeelf boa rein • bi.„ sad, t. sneerer to thr Chewer Weitialsoter, sallow the we cath,l e e shoes eannot be touched by tMM •a. It eta&e : 1,.t he wi s h es p ar li ament t o b e petitioned • •ew law, which vnl n 41704 the liberty bur, glees se. I • neaide, 't , t that catholic., by law, bad a right to be goverasi t Idly, that so law or authority bound them ts be *R aneersed by liens apostolic, and that they were at •rty be have a hierarchy. teat a, an arch'estep and 'l4 with lead titles, se tithes from places in the essatay. Thirdly, that aseiedlogly such tithe We BO: SOWN say awoe lea( es they are sot the actual title. hold by the NON. haeterehy. Fourthly. that all these etaintlise taring been exactly ett. anti is the We ereerios el the esthetic hierarchy, this la • eeetly legal, patently lawful, sad usaseatl.ble by ay Pa. at law. it, ;hi all the clamour that has tima Mara ? O. What al Ideas tle attack made upon as ram t Why ham we mumumed—why bold ap to DeWitt hatred ? Why ► ed oat to pebbs tog i 1 ins art ass oe• paper • l•pire Is Ss Lis . In" V e l ir tat • it b• New 11r as --t 11114 "1"1" • •••• Lwow arl bora. Mei dread "amialse sum NJ is the tansain edge le Wm. 10 Omit. •.? , %ca. • Eassied. vet. p. 100. Brarsd. /N. p. NS. iliassad. Tel kw, p. 6. And they have not seed contrary to say law, by rapt tag the *verities session of what they asked. But it will be said, that though we, the catholic*, may have kept within the boun , :a of law, the act of the P.yre Is dero gatory from, and contrary to, the royal prerogative. Lit us me. Bic. IV.—Dore THU APPOINT HINRARCITT TLINCR ON THI CROWN ? This is indeed a delicate question ; and yet it must be woaa. Ivory address and every reply of bishop* and clergy beetimes that the royal prerogative has been availed. Bat this is nothing ceminered with the address to her Ma laity by some hundred members of the bar, to the effect Mat by this en " a foreign potentate has interfered with her Majesty's undoubted preropetive, end has assumed the right ot nominating bishops and archbishops in then rules sad of conterriag on them territorial sank end jurisdle•ios." Ore suppallti that thom who sig.ttd this enteno rial, being protessi.n , lly learned is the Law. have studied the question—have come to a deliberate conclusion as to the truth of their assertion. On ordinary occasions one would bow to so overwhelming an authority ; on the pre sent, I think we shill not be wrong in demurring to its award. There is one point which I would beg respectfully to tog oat to the consideration of persons better versed in law than lam. Lately suds, after mature consideration, the Holy Bee liee formed a new rulesiuttcal province in the West ladies, by which al titun•apoatoltc have been appointed Whops in ordinary But there hie bus a more remarkable indium of the rinds, of the papal supremacy in the erection at hishopriee surer home. Galway wu not an episcopal sea till a Sew years ago. It was governed by a warden, elected periodi cally by what are WWI the Tribes of Galway, that is, by families bearing ruts& names, every member of whom had a vote. tistioui incoevenienees resulted from ibis anomalous OP ♦ C♦THOLLO 100ATIV1 OP MI state of things, and hence iteras;;;;;;;;;;;;;Ite holy me, which chanced the wardership into a bbiteprie, and appointed the Right Nev. Dr. Brown since translated to Blphin, first bishop of that diocese : Balton Brown was eon tweeted Oct. 23, 1831. No remonstrance was made, no Outcry raised, at this exercise of papal power. Bat to return to our colonies ; it had come to pees, that with the exception of India, hardly a viemapostolie was loft in tole foreign p isarsione. Far am I from blaming the sowed policy of successive edminie trations, which had men the practical inconveniences of a half-toleration, and si mi.!, cognition, where friendly official intercourse and co-operation was necessary% Bat I may ask, is it mytitiag unreasonable, tztravagent,sull more, "insolent and insidioue," in :he catholic, of Ragland, to have sought and obtained what insignificant dependeocits bad received ? hieny of the bishops of the new &some' had scarcely a dozen ries'', and but scattered ducks, generally poor emigrants. And could it be eupposid, that they in tended to remain fur eye, in a temporary or provisonal state, when they possessed not only stately churches, eight or ten great and generally bean iful colleges, and many extensive chari.able institutions, but nearly six hundred public churches or chapels, and eight hundred clergy ; and when they reckoned in their body some of the moat illustrious, sad most distinguished men et the country ? But, moreover, the increase of bi.hops, from four to eight, was already found to be insufficient, and it was become expedient to increase it to melee or thirteen. Now, an episcopate of thirteen vicars a; ostolic, without of course a meth poiitan, would have been an anomaly, en irregularity, without parallel in the church. Was it then ticmethiag ao unnatural and monstrous in us to call for what our colonies had received, to toil document, and in many other similar ones, in eluding the Premier's letter, the Pope's sets are spoken of as real, and taking eff,ot. The P..pe he. 'named a right," he "has parcelled out the land;' ha "tees named arch- I Hawes and b"hops." I', according to the oath takee by •on embolic", the Pope notonly ought not to have, loot really " hae" not prewar or thrisdimion "spiritual or ecclesiser teal " in these witless, it follows that, according to them, the Pope's ecclesiastical anti with regard to England are mere nullities, and are "spired to have no exi.tence. It is as though the Pope had not spokes, and had not issued any document. To set otherwise is to recognise au dirket sat of power on his part. I am confirmed in this view by Lard John Ruwell's ex planation cf the protestant oath. "The oaths now taken aro not altered. We shall continue to take the oath, that 'the Pope bee not; &t ; though at the some tiara there is so doubt, in point of fact, that he exercises a spirituel authority in these teem.. I have always integrated the oath to be, that, in the opinion of the perste taking it, the Pope has not any jnrledicti as which can be enforced by law, ee ought not to Save."• Awarding to this test, the Pope (permissively, at least) does excretes a spiritual juriedietiou la Roglsod, and is within the limits of that toleration, so -long as he does rot exercise • jurisdiction which can be enforced by law, or purport' et or shaming to be a jurirlictiom enforceable by law. Now, no one for • moment imegin.s that the Pope, or the catho- lies of Beglsed, or their bishops, dream that the ap pointment of the h . by can he " enlianed by 1.. w." They 11. have it to be as act altogetht r ignored by the law ; an act of spiritual juriedietion, only to be enforced upon the constieoc.s of thew who acknowledge the papal suprenescy by their conviction and their faith. Has this assumption of titles been within the terms of the law ? Is there an law forbidding the assumption of the title of trabop ? A. retain Dr. Dillon assumed it, and ordained what be called presbyters, nod no , ne thought or prosecuting him. The Moravian" have bishops all over Eogland ; and ea have the Irvingites, or Amistulicals ; let no or • taxes them with illeplity. Then our takieg the title of bishops merely, constitetes no idgrality. le there any law thet Icrbide our taking the title from any place not berth,: awe of an Anglican bisbcp ? No one can say that then is. Then I ask those more learned in the law . tban myself, can &A Set 01 • 11111• Ct of her Meet Gracious lii.jesty, which by law be is perfectly conspetest to do, be au infringement of her royal preresst , ve ? If not, then I trust we may con. elude that by ibis new creation of catholic bishops that pre r votive has not been violated. No sae &oasts that the bishops so appointed are Roman catholic bishops, to rule over Roman catholic flocks. Does the crown elms the right, coder its prerogative, of naming each bishops? It will he said that no limitation of jariediction is made I. tM ppal document, no rerriction of its ezercis , to eatt slice ; and hence Lord Jobs Rumen and others conclude that there Is in this brief " • pretension to supremacy over the realm of En.land, and a claim to sole and undorided sw.y." Every cEcial document has Its proper forms; and had those who blame the tenor of th's token any pals to examine those of Papal documents, they wokil have f Fund nothing new or unusual in this. Whittier the Pope a: pinta a pee s°. Vicar epcstolic or bishop in ordinary, 'neither cue be @miens him a territorisl ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and g. his no personal limitations. Tots is the ramie gm ' of every church which believes in its awe truth, and in its duty el sooversion. What has !via done in this brief, has hems done in every one ever ironed, whether to create a hierarchy, or to appoint • bishop. r bad we say reason to anticipate, tl.at the act would have been characterised in the team which I do not love to repeat. 2. But further, considering the manner in which acts of the royal supremacy had been exercised abroad, end taking it for greeted that it could not be greater when exercised in for. Gen catholic cos.- tries than the Popes in our regard, we could not sappeis that his appoioment of catholic bishops in ordinary in Ragland, would have been considered as more " incoasistent with the Qaeon'sj supremacy," than that emu cies was considered " ineonsirent with the Pope's 'epee mace" acknowledged in those countries. I will refer my readers to Mr. Bowyer's pamphlet publiehed by Ridgway, for detail- of what I will briefly state. Ia 1842 her blejewiy was advised to tree., and did erect (5 Vitt., a. 6), a Bishopric of J .russiem, ongoing to it a diocese, in which the three great Patriarchates of Antioch, Jerusalem, and Alent.dria were mashed lit° one see, Muth, episcopal jurisdiction over Syria, Cheldea, Egypt, and Abyssinia, sahje ct to further limitations or alterations at the royal will. No one supposes that, for instance, the consent I of the King of Abyssinia, to which there is not • single protestant congress ion, was ask..d. Mr. Beeper also shows that Bishop Alexander was not sent merely to British ',thieve, bat to others towing no alogince to the crown of Ergland. Suppose his Majesty cf Abyssinia, or the Emir Beehir, bad pronounced this to be an intrusion " inconsistent with the rights of bishop' and clergy, and with the spiritual independence of the nation," how much would this country have cued ? Under the same statute, a Bishop of Gibraltar was named. His see was in a British territory ; but it. jurisdiction e tended over Malta—where there was a Boman catholic archbishop, form•lly recognised by our government as the Bishop of blislta--snd over Italy. Under this commission Dr. Tomlinson cfficiated in Rome, and, I undentand, had borne before him a cross, the emblem of archiepiscopal jurisdiction, as if to ignore in his very diocese the acknowledged "Bishop of flume." Ile t0:1- firmed and preached there, without leave of the lawful bishop ; and jet the newspapers took no notice of it, and the pulpits did not donne* him. But, in fur, the statute under which th se things were done, is so comprehensive that ft empowers the Archbishops of Canterbury or York to consecrate not only British subjects ' but subjects and citizens of any foreign state, to be bishops in any foreign country. No consent of the respective eovernments is required; and they are sent not only to British subjects, but to "suet other protestant congregations as may b.• dui thus of placing thernselve under Lis or their authority." If, therefore, the royal supremacy of the English crown I could thus lawfully exercise s self, where it never has befogs exercised authority, and where it is not . recognised as is a catholid country — if the Quern, le head of the ' English church, can send bishops into Abyssinia and Italy, surely esthetic* tied good right to suppose that, with the full toleration granted them, and the permitted exude, of papal supremacy in their behalf, no less would be permitted to them, without comers or rebuke. 3. But not only had embolic' every ground to feel justified by what had been elsewhere dons before, doing the same when to themselves seemed expedient, without their set, any tome than preening ones, being characterised as we have seen, but positive declarations and public usurances led them to the um. conclusion. In 1841, or 1842, when, for the first time, the Holy See thought of erecting a hierarchy in North America, I was commissiond to sound the feelings of govern ment on the subject. I came up to London for the pur pose and saw the Under - Secretary for the Colonies, of which Lord Stanley was the Secretary. I shall not easily forget the urbaaity of my reception, or the interesting con. venation that took plan, in which much wee spoken to me which has finer come literally true. But on the subject of my mission, the answer given was something to this effect: • What dors it matter to as what you tall yourselves, whether vican.spostolic, or bishop*, or mufti, or Mamas, so that you do not ask us to do anything for you. We have no right to prevent you taking any title among yourselves." This, however, the distinguished gentleman allueed to observed was his private opinion, and he desired me to mil ia a few days after. I did so, and he asseired me that, having laid the matter before the head of the deprunest, the I answer was the same uhe had before given me. I wrote it to li into, and it served, no doubt, as the basis of the nomi nation of bishops in ordiosry in North America. I have se d iubt the documents referring to this transaction will be found in the Colonial-Au. In the debate on the Catholic R list Bill, July 9, 1845, Lord John Russell, then in coppoei , lion, spoke to the following effect He, for one, was pre. wed to go into committee on these clause. of the Aet of 1829. He did not mthat be was at once prepared to repeal all those clause", but lie was willing to go into committee to deliberate on the subject. He believed that they might re peal tho • disallowing clauses, which preveated a Roman catholic bishop assuming • title held by a bishop of the Established church. He could not conceive my good ground for the continuums of this restriction.". l . It mast be ob d that there is nothing in the context which limits then sensible and liberal words to Ireland. They apply to the repeal of the whole clause, which, as we have sees, extends equally to both countries. What his lowish* had said in 1E45 he deliberately, and even more strongly, mean:red the following year. In the debate on the first midis' of the Roman Catholie Relief Bill, Feb. 6,1846, he referred to his speech, just quoted, of the preceding session, is the following terms: " Allusion having been made to him (by Sir R. Inglis), he wished to my a few words as to his former declare tion, 'that he was not ready at once to repeal these law. without consideration.' Last ''wins he had voted for the committee, but had reeerved to himself the tight of weighing the details. It appeared to him that teen was one part of the question that had not been aufneintly attended to : the measaret of govern ment, as tar as it was stated last year, did not effect that relief to the Roman eathelics from • law by which they were punished, both for assuming episcopal titles in Ireland, and for belonging to certain religious orders. That part of the subject required interference by the legislature. As to pre irentieg penoas simming particular title., nothing could be more absurd ea puerile than to keep up such a distinction. He had aim the streogeet objection to the law which nine Jesuits ia mei. mese abject to transportation; the enact meat woe ge bailment as it was inefikocious, and it was Ira toe law should be put on an intelligible and indeed .": ft wail appear, therefore, that whatever heidtaties Lea Ms isesall had about repealing other clauses la the Ems *Mies Act, his mind was made up about the netrictios *am sesussiag the very titles et ems held Ammihm Wilms. Had he obtained his wishes in 1846, t he Me timid saw lave permitted us to all ourselves Bishops el /Amiss ec Chester, and Archbishop of Canterbury. I cases these se, not for the peruse of slurping Lord Jam IL 1 wit ineoesistetury, but merely to justify oar. *elms, sad show how little reason we could have had for be. Swirlg that oar acting strictly withia the law respecting episcopal titles would have been described as it has. For it it was puerile in 184 d title., to continue to prelim& catholic' even I the prohibited reason mated for Mmustinuanes of even t hat and no good restriction, is is manly in 1860 lerliefireese as " insolent and insidious," the aaramptios of dap Ilionat from thine accorded de us by the authority Whigli LIM John acknowledges an alone bestow episcopacy spa vs? I have already alluded to Lord Minto's being shown the brief for the hierarchy, printed about two years ago. The eiremistmes may have escaped his memory, or he may not at the time have attended to It, having MOM impatient matters la his mind. Bat as to the fact that his attention wee celled to it, and he made no reply, I can haven() doubt. I trust, therefore, that I have said enough to prove that catholic* have not acted in an unbecoming manner in for themealeas the same right of powering a hierarchy as - had been allowed to the colonies, and clearly acknow ledged as no less applicable to Una. One more topic' remakm Sic. Tome or Wasrunrwrait. The selection of this title for the metropolitan see of the new hierarchy has I understand, given great aroma. I am sorry for it f It was little less than amenity whisk ltd Tux Bizz- Bee. V —Has Tan MOD. ON BSTAILnee... Alactti NUM " INSOLitirt AND INatlnotle" ? The cords in this title are extracted from the ten memo rabbi letter of the First Lord of the Trsaawy. Pent softiies to eonsider that production aa a private wit, ands otu any manitesto et the imentions et her Majevy's government. Unfortunately, it is difficult to abreast ont's mind from the high and responsible Ciliation of the writer, or consider him is unplutsed by any thing that he puts forth. There are parts of the letter on which I would here refrain from vim mentmg, because they might lead see am de, in sorrow, if not i s anger, from the drier path of my present duty. I will Irate it to ethers, therefore, to dwell upon many portions of that letter, upon the el, sing paragraph in particular, which pronounces a sentence as awfully unjust, ae it was uncalled for, on the religion of many millions of her Majesty'ssubjects, nearly all letter& and some of our most flourishing colonies Ti- charge, uttered in the ear of that island, in which all guaontees for genuine and pre catholic education will of tweedy be considered, in future, as guaranesi a for " an I fictive the intellect and enslaving the rout," all securities for the catholic religion ao corky for the •' mummeries of supertition," in the mind of their giver—guarantees and securities which can hardly be believed to be heartily offered—the charge this made, in a voice that has been ap plaud. d by the protestantisse of linglasd, produces in the esthetic heart a fee.ine too sickly and too deadening for in. dignities; a dismal despair at finding that, where we have Meowed, and supported, and (Mowed for years, we may he spurned and cast off he first moment that popularity de mands us es its price, or bigotry is its victim. But to proceed—eo little was I, on my part, aware that such feelings as that letter disclosed, existed in the head of our government on the Wise of the hierarchy, that, having occasion to write to his lordship on tome business, I took the liberty of continuing my letter as fellows:— " Vienna, Nov. 3,1950. " Ms LOID,—I cannot but most deeply regret the erroneous and even distorted view which the English papers have presented, of what the Holy See has done in regard to the spiritual 'oversew nt of the esthetics of England. But I take the liberty of stating that the measure row promulgated, wee not only prepared, but printed three years ago, and a enpy of it was shown to Teed 111.n.0 by the P tie, on e.cesion of as audience given to hie lordship by his helium. I have no right to intrude upon your lordship further in this matter beyond offering to give any explona•ions which your lordship may desire: in full confidence that it will be in my power to re move, particularly the offensive interpretation put epos the late act of the Holy Bee, that it was suggested by plitical views, or by any hostile feelings. And, with re gard to myself, I beg to acid that I am invested with a =ly e cclesiastical dignity—that my duties will be what have ever been, to promote the morality of thole com mitted to my charge, especially the masses of our poor, and beep up those feelings of good will and friendly internments- Wes between esthetics sad their fellow countrymen, which, I deter myself, I have beea the means of some what Improving. I am confielest that time will anon te: i what a temporary excitement may conceal, that sad public advantages must result, from taking the albiEss et Zeeland out of that irregular and seceesanly Inapsagy stets of government in which theyhave bets placed, gal extending to them that ordinary and more definite form Sikh ie normal to the* chute's, and which has already been ges beneficially bestowed upon almost every colony of the British empire. I beg to apologise for intruding at rack length upon your lordship's attentiou ; but I have hoes escouraged to do so by the uniform kindnies and seirteey which I have always met with from every maim of her Majesty's government with whom I have boa .Harem to treat, and from your lordship In particular, MAW edam desire that suck friendly communication siefell bleb. Serrated. I have the harmer tabs, lay lord, your servant, (Signed) " N. Cana, WIIIMAIN. " The Right Hoe. the Lord John Russell, First Lord of the Treasury, rite. lhe. do." I give this letter because it will show that there wee eothing is my mind to prepare me for that warm expression of feeling that was manifested in the Premier's letter; which, though it appeared a day or two before mine reached him, I met cessider as my only reply. Asd Ido sot think that the tone of my letter will be found to indicate the existence of any insolent or imsfeious design. It is my duty, therefore, now to show calmly and die passionately, and apart from any party feelings, the remits which led me and others to baileys that no reasonable objection could exist to our obtaining the organisation of our hierarchy in Ragland. L It wit notorious not only that in Ireland the catholic hierarchy had bees reoopised and even royally bonneted, but that the same form of ecclesiastical government had bees gradually extended to the greater part of our colonies. Australis was the first which obtained this advantage b, the direction of the Archiepiaoops, See of Byclary, with stiffes tet Maitland , Hobart-town, Adelaies, Perth, Mel anie, sod Port Victoria. This was done openly, and was known publicly. and no remoestranoe was ever made. Those prelates in every document take their titles, and they are a kneeled, and salaried, es archbishop and bishops re spectively, and this net by one, bat by slionsalso wank. meta Our North American pumiceous next received the semi boon. Kingston, Toronto, brown, Halifax, have been , erected into dioceses by the Holy Bee. Thaw titles ere knowledeed by the local govermmeate. Is an act " Enacted by the Qaeen's excalket Majesty, by sad with the advice sad Pewit of the legislative amembly of the merinos elf " (12 Viet. e. 136), the Right Ewe. B. Geiger& it . 1 Rosman Catholic Bishop of Bytes's," and is lease beg the title of " the Roman Callas Episeopal Cot "ea By towa."l. ea Mt passed M.& 71,1849 (12 Viet. a. al). the Rlikt 'Bev. Dr. Walsh is wiLe "Remin asthma@ Bishop of the Disarm of Hallfou, If We Needs add *rough tie ass be is tallied "Mte E. C. Bishop ef the odd dicesite'r • Beriseri, suL IsExyaL, p. OmuraßMA Whale dwelt is.) Oolong lir, BM BMW al ta la psi td. lath Jess* p p.lO. • HaviskaL Pisa., . WO. +no Metes Opieltes vial' the p m armor! bed mamba& i namml. lA. t olft .. i. 11 topspin ism Oki tiding sews lei Wm Wm ii thp used e worlip.menk.• Moab fig Paley* Wird ipousluillasits. ISA lawier, hat ID ells on tle rxra .. ..4§, ii as silems4 17 . 4ruki tont lima 111.riiiir 1 1 •2h 0 _ mew WI periarome pp the kl" .•• Itl a thi e r pisph pop pod' prissipllis v i ar._ll lege *ll ar eiliWl4l , lMi alumpeip:Lt.........: llo 4 7 .....V •4 up milnliell to ild et "at impollmAN Wool 4/ a ?NNW. ea* ws. '' 41 PlivAIL ;Ted' doe 1006slis I to Its adoption. I must observe, that wording to the discipline of the catholic church, a bishop's title meet be from a town or city. Originally almost every village or small town had its bishop, as appear. from the history cf the Anglian church. Bat a town or city a bishopric must will be; a territorial" title is never given. Thus in Von Diemen's Land, while the Anglican bishop takes his title of Tiastania from the territory, the catholic derives his of Robert Town from the town. In re establishing a oath< lio hierarehy in England, It was natural and decorous that its metropolitan should have his eee at the capital. This has been the rule at all times; thatch of coarse those I capital* may decay into provincial towns, without losing dish. privilege. The very term ki,tropo'itan, signifies the bishop of the Metropolis. This being the prin• eiple or basis of every IS' hy, how was it to be acted on here ? London was a title inhibited by la.: Southwark ass to form • separate see. To have taken the title cf a • subordinate pertio w n of what forms the peat conglomerate of London, as Finsbury, or Islington, would have been to out ridicule, and open the door for jeers upon the oe w episcopate. Besides, none of those are towns or cities. Westminrer naturally sugpested itself, as a city unoccupied by any An. glican see, and giving an honourable and well-known metro. politan title. It was consequently 'fleeted, anti I can sincerely s►y, that I had no part whattver in the selection. Bat I I rejoice that it was chosen, not because it was the seat of the eourts of law, or of parliament, or for any such purpose, ►at because it betegs the real point mire clearly and strikingly before our opponents ; Have we in saythieg started contrary to law? And, if not, why are we to be blamed 1" But lam glad also for another reason. The chapter of Westminster has been the Bret to protest egotist the new archiepisoopst title, as though some practical attempt at jurisdiction within the abbry was intended. Then let me give thou assurance on that point, and let us tome to a fair division end a good nudentar.ding. The diocese, indeed, of Westminster embraces a large dis trict, but Westminster proper consists of two very different parts. One comprises the stately abbey, with its adjacent palaces and its royal park'. To this portion the duties and occupation of the dean and chapter are m►inly confined ; and they shall range there undisturbed. To the venerable old church I may repair, as I have been wont to do. But perhaps the dean and chapter are not aware that, were I disposed to claim more than the right to tread the catholic pavement of that noble building, and br• athe its sir of ancient conorscration, another might step in with a prior claim. For escoessive generations there has existed ever, in the Beuedictine order, an abbot of Westminster, the repre sentative, in religieua dignity, of those who erected and beautified and governed that church and cloirter. Have they ever bean oisturbed by this " titular 1" H►ve they heard of any claim or protest on his part touching their Wm. poralities ? Then let them fear 'no greater aggression now. Like him, I may visit, as I have said, the old abbey, and say my prayer by the shrine of good St. Edward, and meditate on the oldeu timet, when the church filled without a corona. Lion, and multitude. hourly worshipped without a service. But in their temporal rights, or their quiet possession of aey dignity end title, they will not suffer. Whenever I go in, I will pay my entrance-fee, like ober liege subjects, and resign myself meekly to the guidance of the beadle, and listen, without rebuke, when he points out to my admira tion detestable monuments, or shows me • hole in the wall for a confessional. Yet this splendid monument, its tree. sures of art, and its fitting endowments, form not the p •rt 01 Westminster whit* will concern me. For there is ano • they part which stands in frightful contrast, though in imme diate contact, with this magnificence. In ancient times, the existence of an abbey on any spot, with a large staff of clergy, and ample revenues, would have sufficed to create around it a little paradise of comfort, cheerful ness, and ease. This, however, is not now the case. Close under the Abbey of Westminster there lie concealed labyrinths of lanes and courts, and alleys and slaw, nests of ignorance, vice, depravity, and crime, as well es of squalor, wretchedness and drew; whose atmosphere is typhus, whose ventilation is cholera: in which swarms • huge and almost couutless popeletion, in great measure nominally at least catholic ; haunts of filth, which no sew age committee can reach—dark corners which no lighting board can brighten. This is the part of We.tmiuster which alone 1 covet, and which 1 shall be glad to claim and to visit as • blessed pasture in which sheep of holy church are to be teeded, in which a bishop's godly work has to be done, of consoling. converting and pre. serving. And if, as I humbly trust in God it shall be seen, that this special coltate,srising from the sue tabliehmeat of our hierarchy, been fruits of order, peaceful ness, decency, religion, and virtue, it may be that the Holy ' See shell not be thought to Dave acted unwisely, when it bound up the very soul and salvation of • chief pastor with thews of a city, where the name indeed is glorious, but the purlieus infamous—in which the very grandeur of its public edifices is as • shadow, to screen from the public eye sin and misery the most appalliog. If the wealth of the abbey be stagnant and not diffusive, jilt in no way rescue the neigh bouring population from the depths in which it is sunk, let there be no jealousy of any one who, by whatever name, is read) to make the latter ha are, without interfering with the former. I cannot conclude without one word on the pert which the chip of the Anglican church have acted in the late excitement. Catholics have been their principal theo logical opponents, and we have carried on our con troversies with them temperately, and with every personal consideration. We have had no recourse to popular arts to debase them ; we have n attemoted,even when the current of pubic feeling has set against them, to turn it to advantage by joining in any outcry. They are I cot our members who yearly all for returns of sinecures or episcopal incomes ; they are not our people who form anti • church and state associations; it is not our press which sends ' forth caricatures of ecclesiastical dignitaries, or throws eule on clerical avocations. With us the cannot truth and of faith has been held too sacred to be advocated in any but honourable and religious modes. We have avoided the tor. molt of public assemblies and farthing appeals to Vie ignorance of the multitude. But no sooner has an ripper. tunity been gives for awakening every lurking passion against us, than it has been eagerly seised by the ministers of that establishment. The pulpit and the plat form, the chureh and the town-hall, have been equally their field of labour; and speeches have been made, and untruths uttered, and calumnies repeated, and flashing words of die dein, end anger, and hate, and contempt, and of every unpriestly, and unchristian, and unholy sentiment have been spoken, that could be said spinet those who almost alone have treated them with respect ; and little care was taken at what time, or in what circumstances, these things were done If the spark had fallen upon the inflammable materials of a gunpowder-treason mob, and made it explode, or what was worse, had ignited it, what cared they ? If blood had been in flamed, and SUM uplifted, and the torch in their grasp, and flames bad been enkindled, what heeded they ? If the persons of those whom consecration makes hot), even according to ;heir own belief, had been seized, like the Austrian generals, and ill-treated, and perhape maimed or worse, what reeked they ? These very things were, ore and all, poisted at as glorious 'Mos, should they take plate, of high and noble protestant feeling in the land, as proofs of the prevalence of as unpermouting, a free inquiring, • tolerant gospel creed ! Thanks to you, brave, and generous, and noble hearted people of England, who would not be stirred up by those whale duty it is to teach you gentleness, methane, and for bearenee, to support what they call a religious cause, by irreligious means ; and would not Duct down, when bidden your uneffending fellow Chinese, to the hollow cry of No popery," and on tee pretense of a fabled aggremion. Thanks to you, docile and obedient children of the catho lic faith, many of you I know by nature fervid, but by re ligion Widened, who have felt indind—who could help it ? the indignities that have been cast upon your religion, your pastors, and your highest chief, hut have borne them in the spirit of the great heed of your church, is silence and ante toeing forbearance. Bat whatever has been said In igno rance, or in malice, against us, or against what is most dear to us, commend with me to the torgiveneaa of a merciful God to the retributions of His kindness, not to the award of His judos. May He not render to others as they would have done to us ; but may He shower dawn His kittens's.' upon them, in proportion as they would have dealt unkindly in our regard. The storm is fast pawing away; an hanest and upright people will soon see through the arts that have been employed to deceive it, and the reaction of generosity will soon set in. Inquiry is awakened, the respective merits of churchm will be tried by lair tests, and not by worldly conidderations; end truth, for which we monied, will calmly triumph. Let your byally be unim peachable, and your faithfulnem to social duties above reproach. Shut thus the mouths of adversaries, and gain the higher good will of your fellow countrymen, who will defied In you, as for themselves, your constitutional rights, including fall religions liberty. THE PAPAL AGGIUSSION.—The feelings of diognst and indignation which have been aroused in all clams of the community by the Pope's arrogant interference with the church of this country are by no mum diminished. The country papers received yesterday contain accounts of meetings en the subject which took plea* at Colebester,Dml, Brentwood, Linton. Lymineton, West Ham, Cranbrook, Ro chester, Chatham, Birkenhead ; St. Martin's parish, Orford ; Falmouth, Yeovil, itc. He. Reeoludous promoting against the exercise of any spiritual jariedictiou by the Pops is this kingdom, sod loyal oddness* to her Majesty were una nimously adopted at all these plates. - - Nov.atIIARVON, PI 19.—1 n compliance with a most respectably dined requisitioa, a crowded needs g of the inhabitants of Carnarvon was held last night late Market. ball, for the peeps*, of protesting against the meat agues skins of tha Pope. The mayor, F. J. Walker Jam, Beg., oasupisd the chair, and in an able speeds seqiiiaosi the object for which they had assembled. The amen was then addramod by the Err. Theatas c rzr v kew et the parish, ia ea smallest sail truly by whish met with homy replay hem sadism. Upset the platform were sMaillawled sesoly may iimemimMee, who severally advossiod the MIMS& IMO a peetestaationo against Pagel isterteseem laidismongsasel= nation as the anmemes of the praellf. WNW mea, aad ea address le the Mama mai eel 5e& ... .t. road • faltat *en William Dateettp Itaq., l M tee the Oaensemis Imeseies, eak.4. — i ea ii, waft aympathy et ty le Papa& la Me WM. the oweelieep, sad ido deommired Motili AIM a vele of limbs had hem wed be the these hearty ohms dime eteem the the gam% smialesi Ise nth. diesel desesedaat at Me eltmedsm el Imam l i ' ll ite l liedestal Altdesat woman, sad, amid a Mama steeples's, the masdag terminated. liiatalaalimrtioli or BT. ALDAN'S:Upon the do mesßaphael Mows. ea ialleential mediae let tie liberal party la this look pima, oo and the name d Kr. It Jams, the aim} a emehreg, w as a ratios= le be mimosa be Meet as the illar lasai re tenet. The memetathe party as WI, 10 latest maul tha foiliefia. LAW INTELLIGENCE. THIS 1/AY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. SITTINGS IN BANCO, 117011 TEE CTIENT JUSTICS AND 1L Icmci --- PS/INELL V. TER OFFICIAL 111ANAORRA OP FRI NORTE OP ENGLAND BARRING COMPANY.-Tx' WINDINO.UP RM. - Hr. Wilde applied for •rule calling on John Heanon,lames Ross and John Henderson (, elided managers of the Narth of E• 81..ni Backing C..mpa..y) to show MIN why a moire facies should not be granted to enable the plaintiff to issue execution under a judgment obtained on the 4th Atoll, 1848. On the 17th November lit that year an order absolute was made against the Banking company in question, under the Win .ing up Act, and on the flu of the same month the three uremia now sought to be made defendants wars appointed official manarra. By the terms of the Winding up Act, 11 and 12 Vic, cap. 45, sec. 62, it was prorided that in all actions, suits, and othir proceedings which should be pending against a company, in mut of which (Mehl managers should be appointed,it should be lawful for the plaintiffs in sueh actions, suits, & to substitute such officia: managers u defendants, by entering a suggestion on the roll of such acni.ne, &o. That course had been adopted in the present ease. By the 72ed section it was enacted t►at all jldgments which should be entered up against official =swore should take effect upon the property of companies; a judgment, therefore, against an official manager was the same now as it would have been before against the cJmpany. Rule nisi granted. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. licrentos no Iluoco.—Beroaa Loan C it, Ma. Juana Coca moos, Ann Ma. Ammo Ems. THE QIIISX O. THE INHABITANTS OP BILSTON.-MAN. DaIIt7S.JUDOMSNT. Lord Campbell, iigivrop just. meat this case, now said that this was a mandamus to the chapel wardens and over were of the parish of Bils'on, commanding them to impose a rate in order to raise the sum o' 8001. for the purpose of enlarging a chapel within that perish. Ile (Lord Campbell) bad, daring the course of the argument, expressed • wrong desire that the court might be able to support the promeding, because it had been iestittatcd will the view of coming out a bona Me object, but he was sorry to say that it seem, d wholly impossible, for there were two 'Mal objections to the mandamus. The quest:on tamed chiefly on the construction of the 58th of Gnu. 111., tap. 45, me. 59, which enacted that the chu.chwardens end overseers of any parish, with the consent of the vestry, might raise, by means of a rate, such sums as might be necessary for defraying the expenses of enlarging or otherwise extending the &teems°. dation of churches or chapels in such parish. There were, however, two objections to the mandamus; first, that Sa moa was not • parish within the maniac of the et.actlncni ; and, secondly, that a condition was not complied with, viz., the consent of the vestry h,d cot Mes obtaiqed. Now, with resi.eeit to Bastes being a pariah, it seemed clear to him (Lied Campbell) that Bilsma was not a ouisb, but was within, and was • parcel of the parish of Wolver hampton. There was a moiety up to the year 1753, sad marriages had been celebrated there before the passing:of Lord Haedwicke's Maniere Act, but still it was ouly • ch•- pslry within the parishof Wolverhamptoo. Then there wail the the condition that the consent of the vestry should be ob tained, but the supposed proof of that consent had failed. Tram bad been a meeting at W.lverhanipton in June, 1825, when a resolutioa was come to chat 5501, offered to he lent by the Society for Promoting the Building and Belittling Churches, should be accepted, and that the chapel should be enlarged. It was then determined that any deficiency should be made up by the sale of the forty private pews and by a rate. For these two reasons, that the consent of the vestry to the rate had not been oh: ained, and that Bilston was not • parish, the court was reluctontly compelled to say that the rule for the mandamus must be discharged. little discharged. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. THIS DAY. BOW.BTREET. THE LATEBURGLAET AND ROBBERY OF JEWELLBILY IN THE STRAND D. J. Shaw, J. Badenek, J. Gardener. Eliza Owatonna, Bundkr, his wile, Mary Ann Danaher, and G. Clinton , the d-boy, were badly ezan.i,,,A, charged with heists concerned in the burglary corm:thud upen the premises of hirears. Williams and Clapham, the Jewellers, of Nos. 13 and 14, Strand. _ _ . . . . C. Kelly, the porter who was first charged with being con cerned in the burglary, sgain surr, °duct to his bail, and was placed in the dock with the other prisoners. Mr. Humphrys said he should call two other witnesses, and he world add that the prosecutors had come to the con elusion that Kelly was not a partner in the burglary. T. Vernon, a brassfounder and p.w. ern, 01 Charlotte street, Blackfriare-toed—l have seen Clinton, Dederick, and Shaw, frequently together, and I should consider they were personally acquainted with each oth, r. J. Clinton, silver.plate polisher.—l am the father of the boy Clinton. I knew Bade** and Shaw. They are both acquainted with my son. They have called at my house for my cos. Shaw has been in the habit of keeping my son at his house, and from his home all night. I hse frequently spoken to Shaw shout the impropriety of keeping my sou at his house, and, on tile occasion, he placed himself In • fighting attitude to strike me. Shaw came to my house about a fortnight before the robbery. and asked if there were any enmpleinta against Charley. I said he was in the habit of stopping out of a night. Mr. Henry—Did he mean that he wee baking if Clinton's employers had made any complaints against him ? Witness—l do not know. I did not like the man, and I did net ask him. . . . . Mr. Humphrys said this was all the evidence he intended to call; but he would suggest the propriety of diaenarging Kelly, and of placing him in the witess, box. The case wee now complete, and he would elk the magistrate to re mend the prisoners until Saturday next, for the purpose of affording an opportunity to have the evidence reduced to the deposition, Mr. Henry thought that it would be advisable to have the evidence of Kelly. and that it would be better to have that evidence on Saturday. Mr. Wontner again applied for the releus of his clients, the two Boucher, Mr. Henry uid be had on four other occasions told Mr. Wontner that unless he could swistactordy explain how Mrs. Beecher came in potaeuion of the piece of paper upon chick was written a list of jewellery, he could not consent to her release. Boucher was Moe cted with the tither prisoners and he shou:d leave it a question for the jury to consider whether they are guilty or not. Mr. Wontner submitted that there wee no proof that they were concerned in the burglary. Mr. Halaa—Mrs. Bundler endeavoured to destroy that piece of paper, which wee in itself a suspicious circumstance. Mr. Robley also applied for the realise, of Chearszau. Mr. Henry said he would not give any sourer until Kelly's evidence had been taken. He should not compel Mr. Hum phrys to take that evidence until Saturday next. Mr. Heavy then said there was no occasion to enlarge the bail et Kelly, as he woe going to be called ea a witness. Kelly was forthwith discharged, and the other prisoners were ordered to be brought up on Saturday, at 12 o'clock, when Kelly's evident* will be taken, end the depositions completed. MARLBOROUGH STREET. Tat Port IN LONDON LT;;ioti;eoTc;ran, an Irish man, was charged with being drunk, creating a disturbance, and causing a mot to assemble oppusits the residence of Cardinal Wiseman, in Golden square, A policeman said, last night about ten o'clock be was ea duty in Golden square, when he saw the prisoner surrounded by a mob of at least 100 persons, opposite Dr. Wisemaa's house. Witness went up and fried to persuade the people to disperse, whereupon the prisoner, who was exceedingly dronk, called out to the mob to atop and hear him give a lecture upon the catholic religion, end wound up a violent address by declaring that he was the Pope, at the same time pointing toe long white frock he wore and which he said was his pontifical robe, u a proof of h is assertion. Witness then took him into custody. Mr. Hardwick seat him tepee:ea fora week. NARROW ESCAPE OP MR. JCSTICE ERLE.—ThiS morning, shortly before 10 o'clock, u Mr. Justice Ede was riding on horseback to the Court of Queen's Bench, a horse and cab, without a driver, ease up at a furious pace from the direction of the Old Palace-yard, and when opposite Canning's statue, in New Palate-yard, was capsized; the driver of another cab in attempting to stop the horse having unfortunately fallen under the wheel. The horse upon which the learnedjudge was riding became extremely restive, and plunged about in the most furious manner. Its rider endeavoured to control it to the utmost of his strength, but the horse plunged so violently that the turned judge wee in imminent danger of being thrown off. At lug* mural parsons tcok hold of the horse, and the learned ledge mu relieved from his perilous position. den- atl The cabman who latensperd to stop the tableau, was grey, but not serenaly injured in the head and other parasol Ms person. THE DALE OF PORTLAND'S RENT-DAL—At tllO uneday of has Grua the Duke of Portland, held at s.rpatli during last weak, the munificent return of 30 per mat ma made by order of that nobleman to his nunterene leaantry. [Advertiire...- ELECTRIC 'PELIORAPH COM mau.—We ars to been tba following cepy of a Inter , reikesred to tbe ane Dinettes of the Electric Tolagespic =pug; "u s e" inc 5 . 4 6 1 ,1 48.1 a til . ntren,— W your i.:uulest.itstra es=dismeol te be libellous la ger letter pm*** In the BMW se Ste Ostdnr, leek be Nisit Ile Omit of games Broth bemetiamily after the omelet • rs.Me ilbetelem Mak It :IMO te mouse men Me- • Set ft me net our klearAon ta say mea. use that pm ce my psi** sirauer se telllgke amt. mel sesunse of the d a l ....... erzy Ober waimakaiva tesavea or treamilleil loy ye, **Mai" allsk NUS* Nell Tbe dislieW. NW fele • te thifter, oar I** memos* .you MU disk 1t swan - • mit neter gear trenciedisselen tiddit is sages out gold* gebemosl sag team with Or ftillatmek *Yam reaVil • emehtsr Er ban were ima , idea Opeeull te Cburt Quoin% air Ism ~Os kr um egetesten met I MMlnelenses -IMI gea *NM Ms Me far et lab quiet% ad abuilea PPIIIMPIikao We our ton • =ar= lOW% 111011•1 kn. • • , wr i ' I g