The Express. — London, England, 1862-05-16 00:00:00

J • IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. BOUM OF LORDS.-THIJR6DAY, MAT 15. The LORD CUA54111401 took his seat on the woolsack at Ire o'clock. The Tendrils* Hundred Railway Bill was read a third time and pawed. Several petitions were presented against the Revised Edu cation Code. DIVISIONS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS. The Marquis of BATH gave notice of a motion to appoint a select committee to ascertain whether any improvement could be introduced in the mode of taking divisions in that house. PUBLIC WORSHIP BILL. The Bishop of OXFORD promoted • petition against Lord Ebury's bill from clergymen of Buckiugheni soother from the draum of North Grantham, and A third from a member of the English Church Union, to the same effect. REOLSTRR OF VOTERS BILL Their lordships then went into committee on this bill. On clause 1, which provides for an alphabetical register in every borough and county, The Earl of CARNARVON objected that the clause was unnecessary, that it substituted as inferior arrangement for the existing one, that it would involve the counties and boroughs in needless expense, and that it was compulsory instead of being, es it ought to be, permissive. He moved an amendment to substitute the permissive for the compul sory principle, giving the right to the quarter aessiona or corporation to direct such a register to be made. Ultimately the amendment was agreed to without a division. Other verbal amendments were agreed to, and the house resumed. THE. BILLS OF pECILL . I:7OI3 (1:11.1qA14D) ACT, 1861, AMENDMENT BILL, The report at ameadnaenla to Mk till was received and agreed to. CRIME IN IRELAND. The Marquis of CLANRIOARDE moved an addreas for copies of the criminal calendar of each county in Ireland, and of any report upon the state of crime in the country presented to the judges by the inspectors of police at the but assizes in Ireland, and for a return of all homi cides and aggravated assaults that bad been committed in Ireland within the last twelve months, and of the trial of persons accused of each crimes, and the result of each trial. Earl GRANVILLE said that the noble marquis would find in the returns more information than he had asked for. PUBLIC WORSHIP BILL. Lord EBURY stated that the Public Worship Bill would not be proceeded with. As to the Arcot Bill, relating to the subscription required of the clergy, be had prepared • measure which he thought would effect the object to new in • more simple and satisfactory manner. The bill was laid on the table and read a first time. RIFLE MATCH BETWEEN THE LORDS AND COYMONS. Earl GE.ANVILLE maid—Before your lordships adjourn, lam sure you would like to know whether there is any truth in a certain rumour with regard to this house being likely soon to be at war with the other house of parliament. (Laughter.) It appears that a challenge has been received in due form and accepted. How far my noble and learned friend on the woolsack was authorised by aoy order of the house to go the length of accepting the challenge—(r mewed laughter)—without some preliminary notice which might have led to a more amicable understanding between the two boasts I am not prepared to say. The LORD CHANCELLOR-1f lords, it is un doubtedly true that the Lord Ch stan ds before you r one who ham to confer, I am afraid, to another irregu larity. But, my lords, I will state the manner in which it occurred. As I was about leaving home I had the honour to receive front the Speaker of the House of Commons a challenge. It came from the House of Commons to the House of Lords, and was delivered to me. It is true, I did not stop to inquire whether I had the authority to accept such a challenge. But having that spirit which I trust every one of your lordships would desire me to exercise and exhibit, I accepted at once that challenge, and returned an answer that we would meet the House of Commons in honourable rivalry in any place, at any time, and with any weapon. (Laughter.) I mmht probably have been irregular, but I felt is would not do to hertate. although if I had had the fear of the noble duke (Buceleuch) before my eyed', I might have abstained until I had referred the question to your lordships. I trust we shall meet the House of Commons in the same spirit in which they have offered to meet us. I am sorry to my, therefore, that your lordships' are pledged to this combat, and I venture to prophesy that you will not recede from it, but will enter the lists in a manner worthy of this hour of parliament. Their lordships then—twenty minutes rat six o'cicck— adj pureed. HOUSE OF OOMMONS.-THURSDAY, MAY 15. The SPILIXR took the chair at 4 o'clock. PRIVATE BURIN ES.9. The following bill were read a third time and passed East Loudon Water; Tewkesbury azd Malvern Railway; and We sod Brenyearth Kends ; NOTICES OF MOTIONS. RECIPROCITY TREATYBRTVIIEN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA. Mr. FITZOERIII grre n otice that to-Morrow he would ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the government bad received from our minister at Washington a copy of the report of the committee of the Home of Representatives on the operation of the reciprocity treaty with Canada, and whether, if such copy had been received, he would have any objection to lay it upon the table of the house. THE INDIAN NAVY. Sir H. WILL OUGHBY gave notice that upon the house going into committee of supply be should ask the Secretary of State for India what was the position of the Indian navy; whether it was to be abolished, sad, if so, how would the guarantee of the naval prospects of the officers be awned out. THE SLAVE TRADE. Mr. LAYARD, answering a variety of questions by Mr. Buxton, said the slaver Nightiosle was a vessel under American colours, and during e time she was fitting out at Liverpool there were no circumstances to give rise to suspicion, or to induce her Majesty's officers at Liverpool to take any step in the matter. It was only after she waned that the authorities were informed she was a slaver. Be wee happy to say that we were enabled by Miasmatic* transmitted to the African coast to have her seized with a full cargo of slaves on bard. (Heir, hear.) As to the second question, he regretted to say that a very consider. able slave trade had sprung up between the Portuguese •settlemente and the island of St. Thomas, under the pretence that they wens free labourers, but he feared, however, they were slaves. Her Majesty's govern ment had thought it right to make a strong remonstrance to the government of Portugal OD the subject, Rod he trusted, when the King was made aware of the gross infringement which had taken place under the sanction of the Portuguese authorities, steps would be taken to put an end to it. The third quest ion: related to the suppression of the slave trade in Cuba. There again be was sorry to say the Spanish au thorities had countenanced this detectable traffic, bat he hoped the Spanish government would give no support,* their officers in the island of Cuts. We had made a special remonstrance to the Spanish government on the subject, and lie trusted that decisive measures would be taken in consequence. His bon. friend's fourth question refried to the slave trade carried on in islands in the French posses sions on the east coastof Africa. Lord Cowley was instructed on the 19th of December last to make a representation to the French government relative to the continued shipment of slaves from the Canino islands to Reunion and other French possessions. The French government had sent out to make enquiries on the subject, but the distance was great and the means of communication difficult. and up to the present moment they could not expect to receive any answer. But considering the treaties we had entered into with France fur the suppression of the slave trade in those possessions, and considering the desire which the Emperor had personally expressed to put an end to that tnffio. he had no doubt that when the French government obtained information as to what was going on in the Comoro islands, they would take energetic steps to stop the trade carried on in that part of the world under false preteuvea. With I respect to the employment of large numbers of slaver by Mr. Consul Sunley, on his sugar ',lmitations at Johanna soil his collecting them at Anjouan, while be opposed the prosecution of the French immigration system from the Comoro islands, her Majesty's government bad written to Consul Smiley asking for an explanation which had since been given. The consul was a gentleman of great activity, energy, and humanity, and had dope a great deal towards improving the condition of the inhabitants of the island of Johanna. lie felt it was only due to that gentleman to refer to the reply to the despetch, which would be found in the slave trade papers. It would be seen that Mr. Coaeul Sunley there stated that he employed seve ral people on his estate, namely, 300 men and 100 women. A majority of these people were slaves belonging to inha bitants of the island, but 'JO of them were free people. The whole of them in their relations with him (Mr. Consul Sun lay) were perfectly free, and he made no distinction between them. They received wages and they were free to woe sedge. That was Mr. Consul Sunley s explanation. The fact was this, that them slaves belonged to inhabitants of the island, and were allowed to work as free labourers,and were employed by Mr. Consul Smiley without any referents to their state of servitude. At the some time it wee a ques tion as to how far that gentleness was justified in employ tag ponces in a state of slavery, though he was himself not supposed to know they were slaves, as they came to him as free labourers, sod moseyed Her Majesty's govern ment hail under their osemidirstins bow far they might ap prove of the conduct of Mr. Consul Seeley in this matter. POACHING CASE AT MAIDSTONE. Mr. DIGIT 81CYMOUS hogged to We the Soiotory of State for the Hems Departageot, whether hi athletic bad been called to s statement in the newspapers that a child of the name of Thaw, aped Mae years, Inn Islay Sued Ils. by a bemeh of fa se Maidstone for Wog found ia pomemisn of a maze fee catching rabbits, n e e t i lli Muth of mint, was emit to prism for three whether he had Wm Asps •to ascertain the feats et Dbl; case ; and, sortiviely, vbeliow say whim* was lake before the magiseraing to dam thin the chid was sag", at the inatiption ar wag mew the esalaul ef Ohms. THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, MAY 16, 1862. Sir G. GREY said that on seeing the statement in the newspapers he immediately referred that statement to the chairman of the bench of magistrates at Maidstone, and he had since bees furnished with • report of the facts of the case. It appeared there was no doubt as to the nature of the drew, of which the boy was charged. That offence, however, was not quite accurately described, either in the newspaper state/neat or in the question put by the hest. member. The magistrates, in considering the amount of I fine they should impose upon the boy, were guided by the knowledge that the toy was acting as the instrument and at the instigation of his parents, and the fine, though nomi nally imposed on the boy, was intended practically to be im posed upon the parents. The magistrates believed the pa rents were fully able to pay the amount of the fine, and they were strengthened in this conviction by a knowledge of the fact that during the last five years members of the lame family were, Ike believed, convicted and fined twenty-four times by the magistrates or at the county courts, for breathes of the game laws, or for amanita connected with poaching. In fact, they lived entirely by poaching, and in every one of these 24 cases the fine was paid forthwith. The result wee the same in the present ease. The morning after the conviction of Thomas the mother came to the gull and paid the fine and expenses, the boy was immediately discharged, and he (Sir G. Grey) was informed that the mother, after paving the amount, said that bad it been three times as large she could have equally paid it. (Hear, bear.) REPORT OF THE CADASTRAL SURVEY 001IMITIME. Sir F. HEYOATE asked the Secretary of State for War whether it was the intention of the government to act upon the report of the cadrastrel survey committee ; and if so, whether he would bring in • supplementary estimate this session to enable their recommendations to be carried into effect ! _ Sir G. C. LEWIS replied that the government had not hitherto come to any decision on the report of the eadastral survey committee, bat as at present advised they had no intention of bringing in any supplementary estimate on the subject. BRITISH MUSEUM. Mr. GREGORY wished to sak the Chancellor of the Ex chequer whether, before the second reading of the bill for the removal of certain collections from the British Museum, he would be able to give the house an estimate of the cost of the alterations of the present structure of the British Museum, sod of the proposed addition., and of the cost of the buil ding and fittieg-up of the proposed new museum of natural history at Kensington ? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that on moving the second reading of the bill be would be careful to give to the hon. gentleman and the house the best infor nation in his power as to the probable cost of the enlarge ments and improvements contemplated as to the Museum on its present site, and likewise with regard to the site of any new buildings. DELHI AND LUCKNOW PRIZE MONEY. Mr. DEEDES asked the Secretary of State for India what was the reason that the Delhi and Lucknow prize money still remained unpaid; and whether he could name any period within which ell claims would be met ? Mr. T. G. BARING replied that the Delhi and Lucknow prize money was now being paid in India. In order that it might be paid to those officers who had returned from India, it wlui neceawq that prize rolls should be sent to this country. They would then be immediately forwarded from India, and the money paid by the commissioners of Chelsea Hospital. Previous to payments in this country it would be necessary for oaken, the head-quarters of whose regi ments were in India, to produce certificates that they bad not been paid in India. Mr. DEEDES asked whether it would be necessary to have prize rolls for officers on the stall who had returned for some time to this country. Mr. T. G. BARING replied that he could not answer the question positively. THE DEFENCE COMMISSION. In reply to Mr. BICNTINCL, Sir G. C. LEWIS said be could not name any day at pre sent for placing the report of the Defence Commission on the table of the house. MERCHANT SHIPPING Ago, hr., AMENDMENT The house went into committee on this bill. On clause 36, Lord HOTHAM moved the omission of the clause and also clause 37, both of which related to pilotage. He thought this important question should not be included in the bill they were then discussing. The present measure might be taken to be the offspring of the committee which sat on the subject of merchant shipping in 1860. Although the question of pilotage formed a portion of the report of that committee, yet it was not inquired into to that extent which its importance required and deserved. Referring to the local boards of Liverpool and Hull, he thought no one would be prepared to my that those bodies had unsatisfac torily or improperly performed their duties, or that they had ever selected incompetent peruse as pilots. Mr. LINDSAY said it was well known that st ports where pilotage was not compulsory the supply of pike. was greater and better—the effect of competition. It. had listened to the speeches of the noble lord opposite and the hon. member for Hull (Mr. Clay), and they were the same as adduced in years gone by, the doctrines in which bad been happily exploded. (Hear, hear.) They had emote evidence of what would be the effect of abolishing compul sory pilotage. At present, when it was not compul sory, the men were much more attentive to their duties, and to be found at a greater distance at sea, and further, they were more numerous and their charges were lower. The only objection which he had to the whole of the hill was that it did not propose to sweep away the system altogether. The right hon. gentleman proposed to deal with Falmouth, the Dower', Yarmouth Roads, and the Die of Wight, but why did he not grapple with the question boldly, and sweep the compulsory system away altogether ? He felt convinced that that would have teoded to the in terest. of the pilot. themselves, and have improved their condition. It would also have tended to the interests of the shipowners, and, above all, to the interests of the public at large ; and if the hams would support him he would, on the bringing up of the report, propose clauses which should entirely abolish compulsory p il otage. (Hear.) Dealing with the question as proposed in the bill was only half doing it, and that wee unsatisfactory. They would have to deed with the question again before long, for they had abundant evidence before them to show that the system at present in force should be swept away altogether. (Hear.) Mr. HENLEY observed that the clauses they were de bating did not involve the question of compulsory pilotage, or the liability of the owners for damage done while their ships were in drugs of pilots. After the speech he had just beard, all doubt be might have had about voting for the clause was swept away. He had known a question of such serious importance disposed of by provisional orders, Led his hon. friend might well doubt whether Liver pool would be safe under the bill. He (Mr. Henley) did not like the system of provisional orders to be extended beyond due limits; and he thought the bill went beyond that. As fuss be could see, he did not know what abuses the bill dealt with, unless indeed compulsory pilotage was regarded as an abuse. Mr. A. SMITH thought the case of St. Ives, where there ' bad been licensed pilots, was proof sufficieot that the compulsory system was not necessary to secure efficient services. Mr. GIBSON hoped the noble lord would not press his motion. The only difference between provisional orders and private bills was that by the former plan • great deal of unnecessary expense would be spared. If there was one thing more than another to which provi sional orders were applicable, it was to the pilotage of different ports. Any conditional orders complained against could be sent to • select committee —they were in point of fact substitutes for private legislation. He would be sorry to ace the clauses throw° out, for he believed they would confer upon a variety of localities very important advantages, and enable them to make desirable changes in the manage ment of their affairs without trouble et expense. The committee then divided: For the clause l3B Against The clause was accordingly agreed to On clause 63, Mr. LOCKE said the clause was intended to enable the shipowner to go alongside • wharf in the port of London and deposit the urge there without notice to but at the risk of the consignee, and therefore he should propose an amendment in accordance with the acts in force, and which would compel • longer notice to be given than the clause pointed out, viz., that after " expressed, " insert "being subsequent to the commencement of the legal delivery of the ship's cargo at her place of discharge ; provided always that the liabilities of the shipowner to the parties to such charterparter, bill of lading, or agreement sa therein ex ensued, and his obligations thereuuder, shall continue in the same manner and in as full force and effect for twenty four hours io the can of • steamship, and forty-eight hours in the cue of a sailing-ship (exclusive of a Sunday or holi- I day), after the mooring of the ship at the place of dis charge, as if such goods bad not been landed or unshipped." If these words were agreed to the difficulty which might arise would be prevented. Mr. H. GIBSON opposed the amendment, observing that the objeet of the cLuse was simply to enable ship owners to give effect to their own agreements. When no time for the discharge of the cargo was specified in the on ,,ract it would be a serious hardship if they required the shipowner's responsibility to continue for twenty-four hours after be bed landed the goods. Mr. AYRTON suggested that • certain time should be a=ml in the bill of lading, within which the merchant take thugs of his goods, instead of using the word "forthwith." Mr. M. GIBSON said the bill left it to the courts of law to delr the meaning of words, and merely said that what ever the parties wised to should be carried out. Mr. CAVE believed that the change made is the law by the bill would give general satisfaction. The committee divided : For the amendment l4 Against it The Chairman was then ordered to report proem, and the house rammed. INLAND REVENUE BILL. This hal was recommitted, and chums weft introduced allowing a drawback of 7s. • cwt. to all peruses who shall have in stork a ton of hops el marketable quaky an t►e 15th of September. TEE PEACE PRESERVATION (IRELAND) BILL., Os the motion that this 141 be said a naiad tome, Mr. BRADY moved that the bill be read this day ail months. Mr. BLAKE seconded the amendment. Mr. P. O'BRIEN supplied the amendment. Sir It. PEEL said that the bill was merely intended to continue the powers which had heretofore been vested in the Lord-Lieutenant. He did not expect that alter recent occurrences in Ireland the bill would be oppoesd. (Beer.) The house then divided : For the second reading 7B it The Againstrms accordingly read a second time having been taken before a magistrate she was, after a re mand, discharged, and she now sued to recover damages for false imprisonment. The defendant pleaded a special plea, which alleged that awes the halfpence stolen there ass a halfpenny which was battered in a peculiar manner ; that the door of the bedroom where the locket and the halfpence ware kept was usually locked, but that some days before the charge was made the defendant's wife showed the locket to the plaintiff, who admired it ; that the defendant's wife then went downstairs, leaving the door unlocked, and that the plaintiff might then have committed the theft ; that after the theft the defendant received information that the battered halfpenny had been hi the possession of the plain tiff's brother, a boy eight years old ; that the boy, on being q uestioned, stated that be had picked it up in his father's room, and that the plaintiff told him she bad dropped it ;that the plaintiff on being questioned said that her brother had told her that be had seen a strange woman go up stairs, though the brother, when asked, denied this, but said that the plaintiff had told him to say so. When the brother made thew statements in the presence of the plaintiff she said that he was a liar. Further, that the policeman told the defendant that be believed the plaintiff had been in the service of Mr. Drury, and that after she left some articles, including • gold brooch, were missed. In addition the plea alleged that the plaintiff at the time of the theft was in such poor circumstances that her father, mother, brother, and herself all lived in one room. Mr. M'lntyre appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Bannon for the defendant. A good deal of evidence on both sides was given in refe rence principally to the plea of justification. Mr. Justice Bylesdirected the jury that it was not now im puted to the plaintiff that she had actually stolen the pro perty, the real question being whether the defendant had reasonable ground for suspecting her. The jury were locked up to consider their verdict, and after they had been absent about • couple of hours they sent • note to his lordship to say that they had not and never should ; but as the plaintiff's counsel worn consent to their being discharged, they remained in their room. In the course of about an hour after they came into court, and gave • verdict for the plaintiff—damage., 401. TILE CONSOLS INSURANCE COMPANY O. =WALL. -AMON FOR DEPOSIT MOM! UPON SHAMS. This was an action to recover 1251. for deposit upon 500 shares in the plaintiffs company ; and the defendant pleaded, among other things, that he had been induced to take the shares by fraud. Mr. Serjeant Shee and Mr. Merewetber appeared for the plaintiffs ; and Mr. Giffard for the defendant. Evidence was given that the defendant, a pattern designer at Leek, in Staffordshire, had executed the deed of the company in the presence of Mr. Hart and Mr. Rayner, two agents of the company, and had taken 500 shares in his own name and 500 in the name of his wife. The deed pro vided that a deposit of 5.. • share should be paid. It was denied that any misrepresentation had been made, or im proper inducement held out to the defendant to take the shares or sign the deed, and the evidence of the defendant was generally denied by anticipation. !&r. John Newell, the defendant, was then called, and mid that he had been at one time • designer of patterns for buttons, but his present employment was that of "weigher." His first introduction to Mr. Hart was in this way :he was sitting after his work by the fire with his wife, when Mr. Hut, • travelling agent, and also Mr. Rayner, the local agent of the nom piny, knocked at the door and asked him to take shares. He said be would have nothing to do with it, and that he had no money. They asked to be allowed to emu into the house and show him the names of some per. sons in the town, and, having done this, he thought the scheme was " well laid out." They said the company would pay 20 per cent., the same as the Westminster Bank, and that it would pay • bonus in • short time, and they " puffed it off " in what they said. They showed him a book (the deed) with names in it, and he signed it. Mr. Rayner said if witnem put his name in the book they couldget other names, became witness was known as • steady hardworking men. Witness said he had no money, but • person owed him 2371. 10e. ; and they replied that only se. • share was required, and he could make up the difference upon the 1,000 therm Wit ness said that if be got the money be would take the shares, but if he did not get the money he would not take the shares. They said—be should think twenty times—that he need not mind singing his name, for it would not bind him. He did not know he was 'Main • deed, and if he had known it he would sooner have had his finger cut off than signed. He had never got the money which he bad lent to a relative, and he feared he never should. Mr. Justios Byles drew attention to the deed, and to the fact that the place where the witness signed was headed, " Schedule of signatures to the foregoing deed," the first three words only being upon the pip which hare the names. Witness continued—The word " deed " was sever men tionml, and he never said that he delivered it as his deed. It was a " list of shareholders " he was asked to look at. When the allotment was brought by Mr. Rayner witness said that he had sot got his money, and he should not take the shares ; but Mr. Rayner said he must take them. He recollected that "lords" and "esquires," and other high sounding names were mentioned to him as directors, but he could not recollect whether that of "Petat Morrison" wee one of them. Cross-examined — His position at the mill was one of trust, or he should not have remained there 23 years. He was a self-taught man, having been at work since he was eight years old, and never having been at schooL He had learnt to write, sett bad walked seven miles every Sunday for • time to kern. He had never seen the prospectus of the company before he signed, but he was told that half the money was to be invested in Consols. He recollected exe cuting a deed at the time of the railway mania, when he was " jun: led " out of some money-501. He had had shares in the South Eastern Railway, and he signed • paper when he sold them. He bad had three shame in the Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire line. He did not remember having had any other shares. When he was asked to take the Consols shares, he was told that it was • great favour to let him have them, and that they had oome to do him good. To the Judge—Neither the title page of the deed nor any part of the body of the deed warn shown to him when he aqind. Mr e . Hart was recalled, and said that he showed the de fendant the title page, and also the fi rst and second pages of the body of the deed. When he had signed witness said " That is your seal, you must put your finger upon it," and the defendant "delivered " the deed in the usual way. His lordehip put several questions to the jury, and they in answer seA th at they found for the defendant upon all the issues. MARKETS. TALLOW. —Tauwariat Evans. The market was quiet to-day ; prime were quoted as follows : Spot, 46.. to 46e. 3d. ; Jose, 46.. to 461. 3d.; July to September, 46e. 6d. to 465. 91. ; October to December, 48.. 6d. to 48.. 91. Delivery to last evening, 620 casks ; arrivals, 1.6'd0 casks. CXY/TON.—uvintroof., NAT 15.—Oar market costliness extremely sat, withvery small alas and cattier emdar prises. The sake are 2,000 balm, hided* 580 American at 94d. to 14d. ; 1,300 Sorg, spa. to 100. • 80 Egyptian, 9d. to 141.; exporteam, 134 •, of which 2,000 are for speculation aad The week's import is 35,193 balm. WOOL AND W °KITED. —Mumma% MAT Is.—There L little wool changing bands to-day. There in no desire to operate except to the smallest possible extent. Purchases are made in favour of the buyer. The yarn marks* is quiet. Spinners are pretty well engaged for the bans trade, but the export houses are doing little or nothing. In the piece market there has been a moderate attendance of bac h r e s y , and more orders have been placed for fancy goods. (*me forward slowly, however, and the bulk yet rentals to be given out. Manufacturers of plain goods are Wily, though in the home merchants' warehouse* these more cif doggishly. The quantity bought for America falls 'bat of the expectations entertained bore. Reports from Paris meatless the suspension of a arm to the sta ff trade ; the liabilities are stated not to be large, and the knees partly epos a few beam here. LACE AND HOMERY.—NorrnrozAN, MAT IL—The state of the lace trade is not quite so hopeful as we bath hew able to describe it for ward weeks lad past, but times is still a very animated demand for all kiwis al en bees, OLT. tains, shawls, and edrinp of which ow principal math. feetewers have sent seek exquisite apeamthe to the later nationid Waite's. Theo domed far plata aid seam nets hss hese unferessailp samba ig westheu esesieleries album eirs width s t thine Wards, the home tombs is Ur balm dm Weld 1111•111.• • ably have been o:pentad. As soon as commercial relatir ea are established with the Bides, and a good supply of cheap cotton is to be obtained, • remarkable impetus will be given to all branches of our local ioduatrv. The hosiery trade remains in • depressed conditioo, alnomt bordering on attg. natioo, roosidering the season of the year : but we era glad to hear that within the last day or two some s)mp. toms of • return to • better state of things in the Lome market have appeared, and that a few small parcels are being assorted for the East ladies. At present, hoe, ver, the various branches of the hosiery trade must suffer in a similar proportion to the spinners of Lancashire from tLt scarcity of cotton.—Noffinghom Journal. MAN.-Mammalian, Mar 15.-At this day's market there was • short supply of wheat from the farmers. which sold at barely la per quarter under the curreucy of thin day ee'oniglit ; American, Is. to 2a. per quarter cheaper. la. per quarter lower. English beaus, Is. higher ; whilst Egyptian were offeriog at ls. decline. Peas, Is. higher. Yee 15.-We were fairly supplied with wheat to-day, ll had • good attendance of buyers. Holden were not disposed to concede much in price. In some instances last week's rates were made, but the general sun done mast be quoted at Is. par qr. reduction, with a firm trade ; 295. per sack wee the top price for red whet. Only five or six samples of barley in the market, which brought nominal prices. Oats of beet quality supported late rata. No change worth notice in beans or pea.. Beat red wheat, 28s. to 29e. ; second ditto, 2.k. to Vs. ; inferior ditto, 18e. to 21s. Barley, 30a. to 40a Oats, 21s. to 30s. Beans. 18e. to 21s. Peas, 18s. to 21s. Old fine flour, 44a. to 48a. ; other flour, 395. to 425. MANCHISTII, MAT 15.-The attendance at our market this morning was only moderate. Wheat met • very slow sale ; English at • reduction of fully ls. per quartet ; and American, 2d. to 3d. per 10011 w. In flour there was too little paring that prices were almost nominal ; English was offering 6d. to is., and Americas, 6d. per barrel, below the currency of this day se'nnight. Oats and oatmeal were In limited request, and the turn in favour of buyers. Egyptian beans and Indian corn each receded 6d. per quarter. NIVIABE, MAT 14.-There was • disposition on the part of factors to-day to purchase wheat at 2s. per qr. less money than last week ; the farmers resisted, and retained their samples. Barley had • dull sale at Is. per qr. decline. Oats and beans quiet. NEWBURY, MAT 15.-We bad a moderate supply of wheat ; • fair business was done at barely late rates. No thing doing in barley. Oats quite • shilling dearer. Beans and peas very dull. Mammal. Ilav 15.-A abort supply of wheat, width meek; a dull wile, and Fier are Is. to 2e. per qr. lower; the beat price °Moodie 64w per qr. The trade in spring corn is slack and pries* unaltered. Watmeroan, Yet 14.-The accounts received from London and Liverpool have had a very depressing effect on the trade here today. and prices of most articles are in favour of boyars, with only a limited business pawing. Weather most favourable for the country. ' - ,—.— EDINBURGH, MAT It —We had in the turbot today 978 quarters wheat, 720 barley, 1,497 oats, and 101 tiara There were sold—Wheat, 684 qrs. ; barley, 383 ; oase,l,o6i; and beans, 81 qrs. As compared with last week:—Wher was same on top, and ls. 2d. down on average ; barley ea ls. tid. up co top, aad ls. 10d. down on average ; oars wen is. up on top, and la. ld. down on av ; teas were is down on to sad Is. up on sr imperial qr. :—Wheat, 42e. Od. to 60s. for;srarlefiL26s. hksa C to 37e. ; oats, 20w 6d. to 30s. ; beans, 01. t. 48a. Bd. Weight of top—Wheat, 8441ba; barley, 5611 w, oats, 45111 w ; beans, 65.115. CkTTLE.—Zoffritaloff,_ 'Lir 14. The number d nettle this morning was 888, or 22 more than last week. The demand was fair, and a good clearance was effected at considerably higher prices. Topprice of the best teed, 7s. 6d. middling and inferior, fron 6s. to 6s. 6d. per stoma The suppl of sheep and lambs was small, the number being 3,231, or 212 leas than last week, 1,280 of which were store boggs. Sales were readily effected at prices higher than last week. Top price of the best muttckgl.; current, from Bd. to ; apt hogs, from 7 to Bd. per lb. lambs, top price, 321. entreat, from a. to 28e., and down to 225. a hied. Fed pigs brought from sa. to 611. per atone ; six to eight weeks old ditto, from 9s. to 14s. a bead. Buornecsia, Kai 16. —The number of heists et offer this day was sessoesbly large and in good condi. Jim ; the deseaed by DO moans active. Tuesday's quota. Coto fully realised. The supply of sheep was a full avenge number ; the mutton trade was more active at higher price. The supply of iambi was moderate, the general quality by no mesas fest ride ; prices stationary. Calves moderate ypisny. Trade steady at /ate rata Fat pip a small supply ; aaearsane made at a Axil higher prier. COURT OF EXCHRQUER.7Iimr 16. ---- - - - - ttinp at Nisi Prius at Miestandister.—(Bdore Mr. Baron Martin and Common Juries.) SAUNDIRS V. BASTABLIL-AOCIDENT. This was an action to recover compensation in damages for bodily injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant's servant in driving a firrengine. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and that the fire-engine and horses were not under the care and direction of his servant. Mr. Serjeant Petersdorff and Mr. Bri4ee were counsel for the plaintiff ; and Mr. M. Chambers Nod Mr. T. Salter for the defeudant. ' The plaintiff, who wu 68 years old, was formerly a hotel keeper, and the owner of • coach and hones at Honitoo, but, having become reduced in circumstances, had taken to cab driving, and earned about 31h. by that occupation. On the evening of the 31st of January last, about 101 o'clock, he was driving through Finsbury-square, and while in the act of turning into Chiswelbstreet • fire-engine, from the Watling-street station, ran into his cab, the pole indicting serious injuries upon his thigh and the lower part of has abdomen. The plaintiff was taken to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, where he remained for 18 days an in-patient ; and, although he had partially recovered, he was represented to be lame and to be unable to follow his occupation. The defendant, who car ried on business in Star-yard, Borough, had contracted to supply horses for the engine, and it appeared from the terms of the contract, which was produced by Captain Shaw, the superintendent of the London Fire Brigade that he was shoo to furnish • competent driver for whose'Degligence or default he au to be wholly liable. Captain Shaw said that an engineer generally accompanied the engine, and took command of it, but he did not super intend the driving. The house surgeon of the hospital who attended the plain tiff was absent in the country, and the plaintiff was unable to pay the expense of his coming to London. Mr. Law rence, the senior surgeon, had been subpoenaed and paid the usual guinea fee, hat he asked 10 guineas for his attendance, which the plaintiff also could not afford. A medical man, who bad seen the plaintiff on the previous day, deposed to the injuries which he had received, and said it was uncertain whether his lameness would be permanent or not. Orly one witness was called for the defence—the engi neer—who said the accident arms from the plaintiff driving his cab suddenly across the front of the engine as it was pro ' evading at the rate of about seven miles an hour to • fire at • Ball's-pond. • Mr. M. Chambers having addressed the jury for the I defence, The learned Judge summed up, and r The Jury found • verdict for the plaintiff—damages 21:g. COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE. MAY 15. (Wore the Jags Ordinary.) WIT W. HAMM—AMOY/IZZ GRETNA-01M 11.&11.1•0/L Dr. appeared for the petitiossr. The marinas took place at Grates Grit wthe 21st of February, 18441 the petitioner being at that time a servant at the Scarshrlei Arms, Southport, and the respondent the son of a board twists* keeper in the same town. They never lived together, bat they saw each other frau time to tame ; and in lie January e t 1880 the pithiest bore her husband • daughter. He bad site goes to Amitralia, where he was I now Wag with a woman, to whet he appeared to be vier vied. Mrs. Haney therefore, seed for a dissolution, on the grmsd of &Mien sad desertion. 1U wan sonde a deem nisi. with NAL SNITS e. wan AIM PIODPX. Mr. I:Wpm appeared for the petitioner, who wen • waiting praiser. The in the year 1844, end frg ies emba lm bited re 7 married at Cia , S has‘ srieg which time they had three Mato. The thee eloped with the co-corrode* with win= wee low living, and by whom she had had two children. Pigden a blacksmith at Garret, in Surrey. The court made a decree nisi, with costa. TERRY D. TIVILT.-RHOCKING CASE. The petitioner, ohalll Terry, a hair-drceser, of Plamant row, Holloway, sought a dmsolution of his marriage, on account of his wife's adultery with her own brother, Thomas Richardson. Richardson, who wa soldier, bad silos committed suicide. Dr. Swahey appeared for the petitioner. The marriage took place in 1842, and had been followed by the birth of two children. Latterly the conduct of the respondent had become very dissolute ; and on the 27th of February, 1860, she left her home with her brother (who had been staying with her), and representing themselves to be man and wife, they obtained lodgings at a co ff ee-house in Bishopegate- s treet, where they leased two nights toge ther. They then both took poison, and Richardson died. The respondent, however, recovered. She was afterwards convicted at the Old Bailey of having been accessory to her brother's suicide, and she had suffered a term of imprimis merit for the offence. A decree nisi was granted. BUILBAGZ O. BURBAGE. Thies was a petition by a wife for adultery and desertion. The respondent was • oabiaet-m►ker, and be married the petitioner in July, 1840. In February, 18.59, he went to America with • barmaid at • tavern at Clerkenwell, with whom he had formed a criminal manexion. The petitioner has since supported herself as a governess. Mr. Pinder appeared for the petitioner. Decree nisi. Mr. H. James was counsel for the petitioner. The parties were married in February, 1844, and lived near Eye, in Suffolk. In October, 1800, the respondent deserted the petitioner and went to America. During the last few years before the separation they bad lived in London, and the respondent bad been in the habit of ill-treating his wife. In 1859, he bad slept with another woman at a coffee-house in the City. Decree Mei. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. NEW COURT. (Mora Yr. Baron Channel). John Henry C0z,1)3, a labourer, was indicted for feloni- °wily smaulting and beating Caroline Con, his wife, a re. speetable-looking woman, about the some age, with intent to kill and murder her. There were other counts charging him with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Mr. Dickie prosecuted; the prisoner was undefended. It appeared prisoner and his wife lived together in White chapel, and that on the night of the 14th of April the pri soner cams home drunk, wanted to turn his wife's daughter, by a former husband, out of doors, and told her to go and get her living in the streets ; and on the prosecutrix inter fering for the protection of her daughter, the prisoner seized a wooden chair, broke off one of the legs, and beat her about the head ; he then struck her with a fiat iron, and completed his cruelty by throwing her down stairs. She was picked up by some lodgers and conveyed to the London Hospital. The prisoner was directly afterwards appro. headed by a police•constable, to whom he made nes of the most fearful threats against his wife. The prisoner made a rambling recriminatory statement, alleging cruelty and provocation on the part of his wife. The jury acquitted the prisoner on the count of sasaulting with intent to kill and murder ; but found him Guilty of aasault with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Sentenced to five years' penal servitude. THIRD COURT. (Before the Common Serjeant.) Stephen Thompson pleaded guilty to an indictment chary ing him with stealing live bottles of brandy. Some former convictions warm proved, and the court nee termed him to 10 years' penal servitude. James NieAolls, aged' 7, described es a clerk, was indicted for embezzling and stealing the sums of N., 101. 2s. 64., and 41. 19s. 7d., the moneys of Joseph Harris &rotten and soother, his miters. There were several indictments against the prisoner, to all of which he pleaded guilty. Sentence deferred. THE POLICE COURTS. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Joseph hfatthey, cabdriver, wee summoned before Mr. Knox for refusing to take John Motes, letter-carrier, as a fare. Mr. Osborne, the solicitor to the Poet-office, attended to support the charge, end, after stating particulars, said be considered the case was so flagrant that he should prey for the highest penalty. The oomplaioant stated that he got into the defendant's eel) at Marlborough-pte, St. James's-street, and told the defendant to drive to the Post-othoe, near Bnekinghem Palace. The defendant said, " It's a bob fare," to which he replied that the fare was sixpence, upon which the defendant told him to get out of his cab, and ultimately forced him out with violence. The defendant said he had a previous engagement, other wise he would with pleasure have taken the complainant for nothing. He was not on the stand when hailed. Mr. Knox said, whether on the stand or not, the de fendant was open to a hiring. The complainant had a par- fact right to hire him, and the defendant was bound to take him. He thought a penalty of 10s. and COSSII would meet the justioe of the case. - WESTMINSTER. Dr. Buchanan ' of Widbury-hi ll , Ware, attended to pro secute oomplaints against three cabdrivers for refusing to carry him. Complainant said that the offences were committed at 5 o'clock on the afternoon of the 7th inst. He bad been with a lady to the Exhibition, and as it rained heavily was de sirous of settings cab, but the drivers were determined only to take such fares as they chose. John Smith, the first of the trio. pleaded not guilty. Mr. Buchanen said he hailed defendant in the Brompton road, when he stopped and inquired where he wished to go, and then said lie would not take him. Complainant had opened the cab door, but in consequence of defendant's driving o ff , was obliged for his own safety to let it go. De- fenriant gave no reason for not taking him. Defendant said his hone was tired, and he wanted to p to Stepney to change it. The gentleman never spoke to him, and he never pulled up. Mr. Arnold observed that the defendant then wished him to believe that every word the gentleman had uttered was untrue? Defendant replied, " Yes." Mr. Arnold said that, by the act of stopping, the defen dant was holding himself out for hire. He (Mr. Arnold) had not the slightest doubt that the gentleman's account of the transaction was correct, and defendant had aggravated his offence by the impudent defence set up. He was there- fore fined the full penalty of 40s. and costa, ar one month in default. Robert deront was the next driver. Complainant said he hailed defendant, who pulled up near Sloane-strest. Complainant said he wished to go to the Eastern Counties Railway, upon which defendant drove away. Defendant rid he was going to change his horse at Queen -elms. Mr. Arnold observed that no cabman was bound to pull up while driving along and take a fare, but he must repeat that if he did pall up he held himself out for hiring, and bad this fare suited defendant he would have taken it. Fined 20s. or fourteen days. Charles Blanchard, the third man, both a proprietor and driver, pleaded "Guilty," but said his bores was lame. Complainant observed that he never said anything about lameness until told be was wanted to drive to the Eastern Counties Railway. His horse was going at a great pace. Mr. Arnold remarked that defendant's license had two previous convictions marked upon it. Defendant was fined Mis or one month. Mr. Arnold said the public were much indebted to Mr. Buohanen who is a gentleman far advanced in years, for bringing the cases forward. Buchanan said he had felt it to be a public duty, end had travelled 30 miles to take out these summonses. _ - - LANDED PROPERTY I BILL.PRO MVEMENT (IRELAND) This bill was also read a second time. POOR LAW OFFICERS' IRELAND) SUPERANNUATION ( BILL. Sir It. PEEL moved the second reading of this measure. The principle of the bill was not new. It wu thought but just that persons who spent the best part of their life in the public service should in th eir adage receive a retiring allow. MOO. The bill applied to each workhouse officers as the master, the clerk, the matron, and the schoolmaster, and he believed that one effect of the passing of the bill would be to secure a better class of officers in the several workhouses. A capital sum of about 360,0004 would be sufficient to secure the superannuation allowances contemplated by the bill, and that sum would be secured by a uniform rate not exceeding 6d., one-half the amount to be levied by a rate of Id. per year for three years. The principle of the bill had been approved by a select com mittee of the house. Lord NAAB suggested that as the brill bad been delivered only two days, further time should be given to consider its principle and details. After some observations from Mr. GEOROR, Colonel DUNNE moved the adjournment of the debate. The amendment was supported by Mr. Warnoune and Mr. HIMBERT. Sir R. PEEL said that there was no desire on the ppaarrtt of the government to stand in the way of a full eon • oration of the bill by the house and the country. The second reading of the bill was postponed until next Monday week. SALMON FISHERIES (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill pied through committee. The remaining orders were then disposed of. COUNTY SURVEYORS (IRELAND) BILL Sir E. PEEL moved for liberty to bring in a bd. to amend the regulation. relative to the appointment of aunty sur veyors in Ireland. The motion was, after some discussion, agreed to, and the bill wee brought in and read a first time. The house adjourned at 2 o'clock. CIIIJRCH BATES ABOLITION BILL.—IAr 14. lrolk PALI& anSineT. Mr. llolissobe Mr. Close Mr. !monde Mr. B. Long Lord Dun.lellin Mr W. Wynn Mr. Merry Sir W. Codrisgton Mr. T. Baring Colonel Start Mr. Dunne Captain Bunl=7 Sir T. Burke Colonel Dickuu Mr. 'Pease Mr. Collins Colonel Pinney Colonel Smytk Mr. Cobbett Mr. F. Peel Sir J. Duke Mr. Hope Joinstone Colonel French Lord '.'ley Mr. Corbally Mr. Hennes/4 Mr. inglutut Mr. Gordon Colonel Ferguson Captain JolliO3 Mr. Wyld lion. C. H. Lenox Rata inttlligence. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—Mai 15. Sitting at Niel Prins after Term at Westmioster.—(Before Lord Chief Justice Cockburn and Common Juice.) NADU v. 7111.D.-81ANDES. This wu an action for slander. The defendant pleaded not guilty. Mr. Hawkins, Q.C., and Mr. Byron were counsel for the plaintiff ; Mr. Addle= wee counsel for the defendant. The plaintiff is an auctioneer at Sandsate, and the defen dant is • builder of the same place. Both are members of the local board of health, and the slander arose out of certain local matters. The plaintiff, in 1856, was appointed cork, sad collector of rates to the board, which ces surveyor till 1857, and after that be had been an member of the board. In October, 1861, there was a meet ink of the board, when a squabble took place between the plaintiff and Dr. Clidley, another member of the board, re lative to the latter erecting some stables, which the plaintiff called livery stables, and asserted that the doctor was a Ivey stable keeper. The defendant, it appeared, interfered, and addressing Dr. ClWky,. said, "Never mind, you are not a thief, as be (the Ountiff) is. You are not a robber." Application win afterwaida made to the defendant to apolo gise and retract, bat he declined, and on a subsequent aces. non the defendant said to plaintiff's attorney at the Folke stone Railway station, "I am not going to apologies toa man that you end! know to be • thief, and has stolen money beloogieg to the board, for which he ought to hare been punished long ago." The defendant had brought the action for the vindication of his character, and not for the purpose of obtaining vindictive ewes. The plaintiff was called and deposed to the above facts. He added that shortly after be resigned his offices a sum mons was taken out by the defendant, charging the plaintiff with not having rendered proper accounts to the local board of health. The defendant's counsel interposed and said it was a mistake. The defendant never took out a summons against the plaintiff. The original summons and information in the defendant's name was put in and read. Plaintiff further deposed that he appeared before the magistrates at Hythe, in obedience to the summons. It was dismimed with costa. Defendant had frequently called him a thief 11000 1857. Several witness were called on behalf of the plaintiff. They said that party politics ran high at Sandgate, ape chilly with regard to the water question. The defendant called no witnesses. Mr. Addison, for the defendant, asked why, if this action bed been brought for the vindication of character only. it i had not been tried in Kent instead of in Middlesex. The words complained of were mere vituperation and idle abase—that they did not refer to the plaintiff, but to the question before the board relative to water to be supplied free of expense to the Weeleyan Independent chapel, and the water to be used in the erection of Dr. Oidley's stables. He admitted the word " thief " was laud, but not the words " as be is," meaning the plaintiff. He denied that the defendant meant to impute dishonesty to the plaintiff in re ference to money matters connected with the local board of health. The Lord Chief Justice said there could not be • doubt that the words complained of bad been spoken, and if they were not intended to convey the imputation alleged by the plsintiff, the defendant ought to have gone into the witness box and have explained the matter. The jury returned a verdict for the plaiutilf—damager, 2001. I•RIIST V. WARRZI. This was also an action for slander. The decimation stated that the plaintiff wee an unmarried man, and thrl. the defendant said of the plaintiff, "tie is • married man, and that woman (meaning a woman of immoral character) is his wife, and thews two women (also bad characters) are his daughters, and he is living in adultery with them." The declaration also stated that he visited a house of ill fame with them. The defendant pleaded " Not Guilty." Mr. Litler was counsel for the plaintiff ; llr. Hawkins, Q. C., Mr. Robinson, and Mr. Francis were counsel for the defendant. The plaintiff is a boot.tree maker, residing in the Wel. worth-road, and the defendant is a butcher, also residing in the same neighbourhood. The plaintiff claimed special demeps. The bat witness called was William Gillett, a dyer. Be refand to be sworn unless his two days' expenese were paid. The plaintiffs solicitor tendered him 54., which he Indignantly declined to take, saying that dock labourers were paid more a day than that. The solicitor then was told that he had • right to 6s. • day. The 10s. were then given to him, which he pocketed with much satisfaction, and was then sworn. He deposed that he never heard the defeadant say anything of the plaintiff. (Laughter.) Mr. Hawkins (the defeadant's counsel)—Mind, no money returned. (Laughter.) The Lord Chief Justice—Have you put your best witness Reward, Mr. Litler? Mr. Litler-1 am afraid so, my lord, and that the plaintiff will have to be nonsuited. (Laughter.) James Jennings, aaother witness, was called, and he pre a similar answer to the learned counsel's questions. W. Bush, collector to the Fishmongers' Company, to whom the plaintiff is a tenant, deposed that on coming out of the plaintiff's house one day he accidentally met the de fendant, who said to him, "Why do you keep that man in the house with his daughters? they are not women of moral character." The matter was investigated by • com mittee of Us Fishmongers' Company. Defeodaot said to witness that he bad received • lawyer's letter about it, and that he @apprised it was with a view to extort money from him. Defendant afterwards mid that witness had wrongly represented what he (defendant) had said to him. Mr. Hawkins submitted that the words sworn to were not actionable. They were at varies:a with the deolarstioe. The Lord Chief Justice said the weeds sworn to were not actionable, and he could not amend the declaration. Mr. Litler said this action was brought on Bush's Worm- Mon, end the other witoseses could have given evidesos is support of the plaintiff's case. The only manner in which the plaintiff could at all amount for the slander was that he bad let part of his house to • woman and her danghtees, who gave satisfactory refs:woes, but who turned out to be immoral character+, and be got rid of them. The plaintiff was then alpissitod. COURT 07 COMMON PLEAB.—MAy lb. --- - - - 1101 op slarni Prins is Middliessz.—(Balin Mr. Jostkie Myles and Onuses Jeri.) 1yM0011:•. Toucnrs. -PALOS The *LOX I thin alai woo a young watatit, 18 yam OK and at tilt tires It iluteldos wan living with bet , It o w wept of tb• delentlizit, mitlueso, L' i M a Td. n .a . drink Chains. HU via glum itattody by the t•• • cakur et *wain gold bast reed abort IDe. to ewer tom out et b Non ; bat TRAFFIC RZTUBIS. AMWAY, Mire Wm. Mfr. Todd, UK open senders ehendlas 110 11111 Week anding'll944l 26. 6 A A A Onand Trinket Curds 1090 15,Z34 11,271 13506 13 717 Week ending liar I. Sergi& Nark Lawn and Dundee sad Arbroath US -- 4.01 4,626 Week ending May 4 . Antwerp & Botteriani — 686 497 1,081 0 23 East AllgilaD • dEle 3eli 640 AV tet North Devon - 415 Week ending May 9. • Limerick art .s Limerick and Boyer Waterford and Li merick .. — 3l 147 214 361 116 Waterford and Li 77 660 700 1,360 1,09 Week ending May 10. North Barern BOO 12,390 23.405 15,891 36MS Mockten and Name= . 161 1.668 7,1126 %We 7,44 Weak men lIN Sabot and Com 11. fy Down 49 491 181 SW 614 Bristol end Wirer Sastern Coullibill Lest,Chathaaa. and Dover 721 2.70 48) SAN 1,606 Midland t 6144 12,602 24,811 57,167 UAW North Briish 2141 2,490 4,147 41,1116 64 71 Soottdsh Central — 1,140 1,787 3,007 SAM Shropshire' Union 3 54 343 00 986 1.001 VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. Ads Ziegler, from Calcutta, April 17, lat. 0.42 lan. TL9 W. Aladdin, from Liverpool for Cakatta, Mash 29, on the Line. Ma. 11 W. gare) from Ilverpool for Callao, March 31, Ist MINIM. from Colombo for Loudon, March 10, lat. 23 8. lon. 6E. least Mitchell (ship), from Liverpool for Shanghae 96 days, 3u. 22, lat. 34.67 S., lon. 102.26 IL Kinnaird, from London for Auckland, Ist. 47 S., lon. 106 IL Melbourne (MeV) from Liverpool for Shanghai) 140 days, Feb. 28, let. 0.14 a., ion. 129.9 E. Orland. (barque), from ikuiderland for Hong Kong 140 days, Feb. it let. JIM S., km. 126.50 B. ?Won, 21 Kong for Londo arc n. Mh B,lst. 20 ft, los. 11 L Parts from 'Ka, from us for Loudon, April 25, lat. 35 N., he. 41 W. Palmy - re, from Calinetta, March 24„ lat. 32.17, lon. 13.63. Vanguard, from Liverpool for Melbourne, April 10, hit N., lon. 10 W. Wild Hunter, from Coqidnibo for Liverpool, Apra 21,1 M, 22 N. , ton. 39 W. [Adveafrisomentl—limow.tes Pau. --Source of Hisppinain—Good health is the foundation of happiness. sna should be seemed at any coat. Multitudes may cam themeless a• trilling expense by purchasing Holloway's admirabl e Pitt and t ming them according to the printed directions folded roiled each box- Loss a Weide, Indigestion, and all the mud foram which dyspepsia ammo are completely curable by there Ihilt which sot as alterstivin upon the stomsch and liver, and sr seething, grad* yet eeriest aperients on the bowels. They sr, not drastic purgatives, sad do not give pain. All dyqwptu readies should know that they have not done all t tred hat muchthe dons to roustablish a hap existence nukes they have Holloway's digestive and Pain BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTH& BEITTLE.—May 10, at Brockley-hlll, Poesitha Era I r . Britten, of a danghter. BUCKNALL.—May 11, at the Terrace, Peektufarrye, the wife d H. C. Enamel, Dag., of • son. HOLMAN.—May 13, at Milt-street, Barnet. the wife of 111 B. R 011•1141, at a SOIL JENKINII.—May 11, at Bullock, Stamford, the w ire of de Zee. A. A. Jenkins, of • daughter. ' JONIE—SIay 14, at St. Thomateastreet. Southwark, the wit , d S. Jones. Esq., M. 8., of a eon. MAITHEWS.—May 10, at Upper Park-street, Barusbury, thew& of Mr. A. Matthews, of a son. PIKECIL—Way 11, at Rtlldreperescent, Camden-road, the ad , of J. T. Three, Iraq., of a son. 1 gr,APLITON--MAY 11, at Queen's-gate-terraos, the wife of J. Esq., of sem WA TO May U, at Oaten Palmtop, longhorns, DerhYlbg v, the wits et the Bay. W. C. Ward, of a ter. - ____ KARR! AGES. CRAMBERS—HAIL—May la. at &tannish'''. Boric. I ' l the Wed Car. the Bishop of Winche.ter, C H. Chatubera bet' to Lambeth', daughter of theists M. T. lime, FAQ . R.N. CURRIN—BARTON.--blay 13, et All 811i111 ', Notting Ilia. Kensingtou, by the Rev. J. Light. J. A. Cumming. Esq . 10 , Lieutenant by Royal Regiment, to Jane, daughte r the late J. Borten, Rm., of Winchester. JOBNION—SLYIL— May It, at Asks Church. Birmin tth ' by the Ur. G. Peaks, Mt. L 'okapis. of Asten.para. BIT; labgballe. to Ithstheik &wester of Mr. J. Illria. 11 4 ' Bewdley. Worcestershire. 3IACROILT-11ANUITY.—Ray 13, at It. Marys, Bryaaatos square, by , the Rev. Y. Holland. M.A., Z. Rectory. Psi . ' .'d the Riddle Temple. to Elizabeth Ste venioa, daßrelt o 4 Resist,. late, Ilmenstousquars. fiCATTRIOOOD—MILOWN.-Iley 13. et Edgbaston Old Chunk Birmingham, by the Rev. I. onthr, lir. J. Scanerroat w Louise. daughter of the late Mr. J. Brown, late of flir Ligjall& DEATHS. .—R AIRMANay 13, at Forest-bill, Mr. P. Altman tri . *red 41, Arrnie—War 13. at Lendooroad, Brighton, Maria. te of ** IL Agin. sod IL saNctorr.—May 11. Mr . J. Bancroft. of alsnchester . Ned CROCKSORD.—Ray it, at Ospriege, near barembet. Mr• • thockford, mid 63. jr. i 1 Meaner Stuan, daughter of the late R ll._ _ id Preyed, Rector of Haiketon. Suffolk. aged W. S ..,, KEIL —ma Is. Weet b oarne -perk, Paddlagtos. .. ---' Rtraired--3143-th Mary Al., wife of W. Routh lea.. of t. histh. egad • ailit e ; BA:=_ma 1 atititiahArtemdmis., midarthitukdaugbamater.dmcof the lev bedf___________ . T or 4 . fiel.wc,:-:.. PAWN WituAx 0 7 ' 4 '; burabli:dapeit,_ bi City ot Inufte.arrarliertim -44. Is Use viraz mat t" Nal ,