The Express. — London, England, 1849-01-30 00:00:00

SPORTING. TATTERBALLII.—MooOow. Inherit:Mae mad Geraldiao Imo hocked for the C "ester Cap at !wlowed prim; the ppm' traaretlow howeeer, were Ms, mod la soma 'mum. sal lb* foontiow la um" Icetuseee area the MOO Tharadey lamt. The hatliag, to hee l. Mood Med! th• Illattopolltan Medias% ler Loupgaros we, tuchadtred . zi antatenehe at 20 to I use doing at dee panto leas flarifaane-e ale. to favour. awl le the early part of las 22f S to I ma takes abet tloWas; the osewor, beim alterganla awed carnet*. law tosakel I. Tsev Mho Daddhalea vas braid 12 ell Deft at SW 2 ate mad wytelme above 20 to I weld hew hue aim akss 111,111112•1:__.1.1dullkkke Oufalrf. =SP was takes Moat 1,11110 to fib Its Om about . sad I,lllelo 1$ shoot the std rrobres demi. llsraolauralr HANDICAP.--8 to 1 apt Comma (t, sad ma pt t• ma Lasgema (I). Id to 1 Wit flateatelm (tf, 10 to 1 opt amokblifor (1), la to agt Clorloma (t 20 to I), 20 to 1 wet law (C, 211 to lope Umtata' (t), 33 to Ist 11c4Inbces (t to MOO. Cameo Cyr —25 to I apt Blather (t mad aft of). 25 ot 1 opt lagetreme (t sad aft Oft, 24 to 1 mpg CorLdtat (t), 33 to I Wins T.otar. lets I met Emma,. 40 to I spt lantesl4 SO to to 1 opt Denim; 3.609 to 10 apt lialltemind (t end aft 142), 3.001 da melt Iftepafaoy (toad aft of), 1,1000 to 15 apt at. Lode at 13 apt ram' it and aft tab 1,01.0 to 13 apt Doket tih rZ aft ad). To fladotMe is... wore meratobed at Clieetor up to pool *Mew emoday posaag;-11aa Wok"' tell, Tau T r rl ra t e Dodo. bury llogd.r, Cm, La. yob Tit, John fluidic, and Ditao2. —4 to I spa D :taw', (900 to 201) t), 7to I apt Tadao' (t to 11101, mad oft off), 12 to 1 apt Ilweimab, 20 to I apt stecopow (t to :Of. sad aft of), 20 to I opt Nanotklet (t 13 to I. 2) to I sot Work a (t 25 to 11, 25 to 1 not Veal (t), 2 . 000 to GO We 119 1 Ul t, (t). 4 0 to I apt The Kaout, 50 to 1 asst llsa Team .2 to 1 WI Mattcrer (t std aft off), I.oou to IS meet S out of IfLualtoo,..lant %C• it was reported yesterday at the West-end that Tho Cur W bes watabed for all kb ',gement.. intents:mut errnscs APPOINTED APTY.R HILARY Cammear. Lunoues-tes.-11rst Thu/allay. Feb. 8; Second Beal, Weft:easy. Feb. f 8; Third inal, Wednesday, Week 1e; Nam* M 4 Wednesday, limas le ; General Polities Day. Thurs. day 311. Ntirma....Tne felowing mask tscept seek aa the parties may wigs to mans Mask present lisk on the poised that Mien have bees de livered ((es the potion of Marini to comma not practi-ing in lb. Court Sir haws Wive., will he transferred. on the WI filFebreary snit, bed the eielle 71st of the Water of the Bulls Ai the list of VioaChsassiler Wars; James v. Powell (3); Walter v. Nine (2); Wlnita v. Ilsetwrigt.t; IPOduinet v. Rankin iti.iTitwasimesd V. Maras frisith v. width; &nee v. Domino ; Gieemway (I); IsslW v. Blare (2) • Kirkby v. Nat'l If); Wye v. GioaKeterr Corpeestkin ; Cross v. ee;igig; Niemen atWa li (3); leellied v. Chopmes; Delas v. Willi. (4); Smite U=chhi (II) ; Attermy-General V. Stevens; Yawed v. Chrin Atebeess v. Masson ; Wigan Lesehee ; Prise v. Berrbigtes ; Edged v. Waltham ; Lams v. lames; Name:ea v. Acrid 4 ; Canner V. Mem; Damp v. Much (6) ; Bromley v. Wright 4 • lillane Y. Daviee (2); lhank v. Beath ; AtternspOetieral V. (Zesty; ' Om parades; Damson V. Ilarteloa; LAWSON V. Woe Middles= Waive works; !fajta v. Kayla; Beckett v. Cawood; Chansellor v.' Eareerolt; Lie v. Castle; Itentil v. Spry° (2) ; 11 6 Dennell v. Wayne* ; Attorney.Ommvel v. Bingham; Pei* v. Walken (3); Athweey-Osneral v. Bath Corporation (2; ; Ford v. Dryad. (traces Boma.— Beating. at Prise)— OMSK. Jury causes: Feb Ito 19 haelasive. Speed jury =Men Fels 12 ie 11 Mebane. London aijourazeisht Maeday, Weis IL—pitting* Itimeo.)—The °ono will sit In lane from The day Falk 1, te NOG day, Feb. 12, inclusive, and will premed with the awn paper, special paper, and sew trial pear ; and will also bold a gain se Thursday, k.reb I, ea give Jw(gment in mess geevlously argued. Cosmos Pease—This court will on Monday Feb. 8, end daily up b4O ribargay, Veto. !ti, inclusive, bold sittings I n bane, and will pro ses:tho new Dild iscue, and the vadat case of lioneypenny V. Des in %.i.dalso give Judgment le cases then standing over foe that parpron kaceratna.--mittings In Dew}—Thls court will all in buteo on Nit. 3, aad da ly to Wednesday, Feb. n, inclusise. BITTUWIS AT Nll.l rims ug MIDIAMI LAD LONDON, befiNT the RI :hi Eon Or Virsdniek rolbek, lard Chid Soros rat lier Mayes aart el Iseitertner, after Ti,,a ISO Middlesex t ja la. Is; annum brigs; Friday, 2ad, mato= and sommou , 3rd, essis mad alum= jerk.; Monday, acti, Tuesday. 6th, mad Wedaraty. fat, madam juries; *Marley, Bth, Friday, 9th, Matarday, 1 0 th, Maaday, 12th,T1wdar, 13th, mad Wod nesday, 14th, vadat juries. la Loadm : Thusly, Yob. 15th, ad journment day—wanes larks; Fri.lay, Saturday, 17th. Mos day, 15th, Tuesday, Vilth, Wednesday, 214, common }uric-; T.rurs. 2h.d, Friday, 23rd, Ilmturday„ !UN Monday, a6th, *lurid ty, .h, and Wednesday, ;Ash, special jurtes. The court w.ll oh at 10. EQUITY COURTS.—Yzernumi. Won the Lor_4 Clow:11GL 1N THE METTER 011TMS WI;DITIO lir OP COMPANIES ACT (11 0; 12 VICT., C. 16), AID OP THI WHEAL LOWELL DIMINO COMPENT.-131P/LITI 11' TIM. The Lord Chancellor gave judgment in this case, sthith was an :Neel from Vicr-Chaittelior Knight Bruce's order, direction notain' payments to be made to the petitioner, Mr. Wyll, hi P., or otherwise that the said company he wound up under the said ace. The appeal by the con; any was issued east Friday (see Express of Eisturria. ). His lordship said the fiat question was upon the constrionion of the act. The comuuny in this case existed prior to the one ing of the sot, the first section of wuich named or described the joint steak companies to which the act was to be applied, and this ctumany was not included in that section. The se cond section mentioned "all mining compiniee," :out it was contauded for the appellants that although mining tom pahies were mentioned in that section, still it was to bi read as additional to the first section, and as part of it, sad from the omission of this sort of compile y which existed previously—from tho enumeratian in tho first section it was to be inferred that it did not come under the opera• tion of the act. For the respondent it was contended that this company, being mentioned in the second section, was within the operation of the act.—His lordship having read the two sections, said it wee importaot to observe that if the argument for the respondent was correct, the second section was indops ndent of the first ; the first section mi,ht be omitted altogether, though that contained an enumera tion of the rots of companies te which the act was to be applied ; aid the other sections were only directs ry. It WAS necessary to resort to the prior acts to pate proper construe. Bon on this. The 7th and Bth Vie., which this act was ex preody meant to amend, mentioned banking compani o, benefit societies, and but:ding societies, as excluded from its operation, and also mining companies on the etch-hook • iple. The Act 11 and 12 Vie. was intended to inriude certain complaint excluded by the former, and they were enumerated in the first section. On compering the sections of the two ac's hislordship was of I opinion that mining companies on the cash-book prineipl: taituitog before the latter act, were not intended to be m end, din its operation. But besides his opinion on t:i- con. ▪ uction of the act that this company did not fall mud, r its opera - tot. he further considered the equitable creunietances of the petition?, ease. It was to be listened, from Ire whole purpose of the act, that it ilid rot prop sets deal with eu ni pont.. Cod were souverut any mere than the previ us act, w.uien uses expressly limited to companies that were not able to meet their li tinting. The acts were applic.ble as tests to ascertain the solvency of railway and other companies. Am mg the tests so to be applied was this, of a creditor ruing sod we:raining • judgment against the compeny„ and the cemp nv's not pay imr within a given time; and so also if a 'hatchet kr was maid, and the company did not relieve him from the pressure. he was entitled to apply to the court for an order for windirg up the compsny, and that was the ease of this 'stowage. The act gave the court, even in that Vase, ui discretion me to the relief prayed. The question then same, in& pendently of the construction of the act, this—abether the petitioner mule out *pupae MS to joinity the court in l's discretion to order the relief which its a: It _ut, on the supposition that the company was within the aloes tion of ter act. He thought a sufficient case was net made out tuna Ito he test afteded by it as to the insolvency of the eidepeny ; there was a mere shouts between the peti t. utter, a shantooluler, and the e company. In the ahsenee of these tests contemplated by the act for the contemplation el tie touresdiattetion, his lordship could sot feel himself jarafied in Aldiag the petitioner entitkd to the benefit of the act, even ii it included ehie company. Being of opiates, therefore, that this company was not within the operation of the act, and, U it were, that, the petitioner did not make out • case for the ex-tciiis of the court's equitable discretion, be thought the petition ought to have been dismissed with costs in the alert Aloe, ; and therefore he allowed the appeal. Mr. Loft, far the sppellants, asked for the coda is the wart below.—Mr. 4. H. Palmer, for Mr. Wyld, opposed Skit applieadem. Tne Lord Chancellor was of opinion that cs the mein question arose on the c unstruction of the act, which was not very clear, ht. ought not to give the costs below. The costs hens, eollree, lip could not give against the respondent, bat each party would here pay his own costs. We regret upon this and other ocsasions not to be aide to eye to the public and the profession the great advantage of his lordship's judicial reasoning consecutively, as we cannot catch sometimes more theft one word is a sentence. Panics ALIOIET V. STEANOII-1 HZ ROYAL ETCHIPIOII. The arguments to dissolve the injuection—so far only a; it prevented the defendant from publishing the dormiptiva catalogue—having been concluded on Saturday, the Solicitor- Cineural, on the part of Prince Albert, prom eded to show presets Cro continuini the injunction to its full extent, as tint granted. He would treat this case both in its facts and law as a ease between the ordinary suitors of the court ,• and was anxious that no feelings ofipersonal respect should he imported into the argument. He relied on the substantial mews of the plaintiff's case, and required no aid from his position in a ease which fell within the ordinary ard daily potence of the court. then was no complexity in the facts of this ease, nor any aiuncalty in the application of the law of this court to them. The plaintiff had made a series of itchier's, and drawings, which he kept as private es ore well viola, end he wished to prevent the publication of them by another amen, who did nut allege any sort of authority for his public uticn—who, in feet, admitted that they were improperly obtained, nut by him, but by another ver so., ids co-defeacant. This person came tea the deo ndane Stranue proposing to have a joist speculation in an exhiii tirm tin these etchings so improperly obtained, fur profit. The pianutiff, upon receiving an intimation (by • copy of the cata logue sent to her Majesty), filed his bill in this court in the oreito.ry way to prevent the exhibition of the etchings and the pub:it...Bon of the candisgme. The principle upon which he at first ask.d too injunction was that the etchings were his property, without any reference to the exact mode in which they were obtained by ti • defendants, for the plain tiff did not toes know how they came in palomino. The question raised bar the coon's iatarposition was, whether the rain tiff had seen property in his works as to satiric him to the tujunetion. Numerous eases already died to his lord ship showed that us author or owner could have property in his anpublished weeks to locate the publication of them to himself. The right to pablish was incidental to the right to tne property itself. The first case, in point of time a- d authority also, to which tee w. uld re fer, was " Millar v. Taylor" (4 Burrows, page 2,308). That ease underwent elaborate niscuseke especially in the HOMO of Lords, where it was argued is the presence of ail the common law judge., and eight of them ware of opinion, in answer to questions pat to thint, that a man had • right of property and right of action in his unpublished works ; two more said he had property, but no action ; and one only that he had neither prequerty nor action —Lord Marusfield. [He referred to and vat poss;:es from the loug report in 4 Burrows, and also in 2 Brown's Parliamentaty Cuss, under the name of " Donaldson le Becket."] With respect to the eleventh judge (Yates), his epicion mats man could not have property ia ideas—things lactelortel—quauld mot be suitatoot leg i oussat In this court, where things incorporeal were constantly dealt with as property, rock as advowsons, for instance. The first question put to the judges in " Kilter v. Taylor" wee whether at common law the author of a book or literary composition had the sole tight of AM printing and publish ing the saute for sale, are might bring an action against those Who did to without his content? That was the question here, and he argued it on the common law, without reference to the set of Anne. The answer of the judges (sight of theta) and of the Roue of Lords was decisive of this ease, as it was of " Mellor v. Taylor:* But supposing te ptiff net to have the right sf action, as two of the j udg eshought in the above Ga g e, still he had a eight of property, se:cording to all the judges, except Judge Yates ; and such • right of property that this nut would act upon by injunction, without putting the plaintiff to his &Vim to establish it at law. The plaintiff here had that prima facie right of property in tko etchings ; he did not allege any property in the catalogue or idea. of the defers. dant, as was supposed in the argument on the other ad-. He may have his ideas, and on the same principle the plain tiff eosin to be secured in the property of Lis works. Ha next referred to and stated eh* ease of the " Duke of Queens bore, v. Shebbeare (2 E len, 329). relating to the publics den of Lord Clarendon's MSS. of the " History t f the Reign of Charles 11 ," of which a copy taken by consent of the owner MD proposed ley the detendant for publication, but prevented by the court, notwithstanding the consent to take a copy. He nut referred to similar cases of "Pope v. Curl" (2 Atk.), " 8 tutLey e. Sherwood" (2 Meriv.tle), " Thimeon v. Stanhope" (Ambler), re specting the publication of Lord Chesterfield's "Letters to his Sm," and to the rose of " f3le v Pritchard" (in 2 Swanston), "Phipps r Percival" (2 Yee. and B.), and "Lord °reseed and Duncitn," in Ireland (2 Ball and Bratty) In all thou, in which the property claimed by the several plaintiffs was of a qualified nature, tar lea. obvions than the present plaintiff's, the elan granted injunctions against the publications by the defendants. But the ease of " Aber meth) v. Hutchinson," upon the amended bill (in 3 Law Journal), was an SWIM to all the arguments for the de fendant in this cue, and so al was the case of " Folgbas r. Green" (1 Simon and S•uart). —The Solicitor-General stated those gases from the reports above referred to, and also Yount v. Winyatt," 2 Jacob and Welker, aed need them to snow that the whole line of authorities were in favour of the 'Maple that every mat had a property in hi. unpublished literary composition, Slid could have the aid of the court to protect it against all intendtss. This principle was not invaded by the case of "Macklin v. Riche:dam" (Ambler), al though inferences to that effect were drawn from it on the other side. In further support of the principle above asserted, he referred to " Murray v. EUiston" as the the dra matic representation by the latter of Lord Byron'e " Marino Fallen; " and to the caw of " Martin tr. Wright," relating ts the picture of Belshozsar's Feast, and the enlarged copy by the defendant for a dioramic exhibition. The defendant there was not entrained, hewer° his was a new work alto- gether, pro lured in • different form from the plaintiff's pic ture. It, while Mr. Macaulay was writing hie " History of England," a plasm stole into his litirary and took sketches of his maanscripts and published them, would Mr. Macaulay cot be entitled to an injunction to restrain the publication ? Was not the present case as strong ? The Solicitor-G I then noticed t cues cited en the other tide, and already men tioned in our former report, and attar again stating the facts alleged by the bill and the defence to them by the defendant, and the line of argument taken on the othsr side, he submit ted that the injunction should be maintained in all its inns grity.—Mr. Serjunt Tall meet and Mr. W. M. James were heard on the same side, be: their 'remounts di't not differ ma.crially from those of the Solicitor-Ooreral —Mr. Rus'ell commenced his reply, but had not finished it •Len the court Before the Muter of the Rolls. Ix as Scrra.—Mortore TO DUIC [TAROS ORDER FOR TA XAT lON. Messrs. Turner and Modell moved in this matter to die. charge an order of course obtained by Mr. Foley, a de lenient ins suit of " Clarke o. Foley." agaiust Mr. George Smith, solicitor in the cause, fur the delivery up of his hills of costs, and to tax certam eats in the cease which had nut been taxed. It appeared that hr. Foley was a solicitor, end that an arrangement had boon entered into between him an Smith that the costs of the suit should bo between them as between a town agent and solicitor in the country, Mr. Smith, who acted as solicitor for sui partied, only taking the town ag.-nt's share. The suit was a friendly suit against Mr. Foloy as the cx^cntor and residuary 1 gates of a decoued party for the administration of his motto ; and Mr. Smith had rid:sired. undo the tear of this smut, the amount of the cots and the money payable in the snit to Foley as legatee. The object of the petition was to sacs rain what was due to F. y tad Smith fur costs, on the footing of the above errs: ip_ment between them, and to have the balance in Smith's bands due to Foley paid over to him. On the part of Smith some dfificalty was made in giving effect to the above arrongo moot, on the groan-I that Foley had omitted to take out his certiGeate fur one year during the clot:nuance of ti .a snit. though he was a regular'y a Anitted elicitor, and bad taken out his certificate previously to the year in question and sub- sequently. It was also objected on Smith's behalf that, hamog regard to the arrangement in question, a special order ought to have been obtained. and that the common order was irregular.—Slessra. Teed and Webs' er appeared for Foley.—The Master of the Rolls said he would read the affidavits before be gave his decision. COURT OP QUEEN'S ERROL—Termini:oa. &Mace in Banco. ALCOCI V. ROYAL EXCHANOR Aturnaten.—MAßlNl I NS V VANES. Thee was an action on a policy of assurance on a ship, in which there had been a verdict for the defendant. A rule was suisequ-ntly obtained for a Lew trial, on the ground of the improper rejection of evidence, of the improper admis• sion of evidence, and that the stylist was against the weight of the evident:ie.—Lord Denman now gave the judgment of the court. The document said to be improperly admitted was an origiaril statement of fee's made by a man called &otto in Egypt. He was afterwards examined under a commission, and referred to the statement he had before made as the legalised copy of what ho had said under a firmer proecediug to which statement he seid he adhcre-t. This document was rejected at the trial; the court were of • pi-ien teat it had bren property rtjic , :d. It was then said that evidence as to the habitual drunkenness of the captain had been improperly admitted. The case el:- tended lunch on the acts of the captain, and al though his drunkenness had been treated in the argument as somethilg which affected his credit only, the court thought it must be put on a different ground. The plaintiff's counsel armed that the evidence was inadmissible, and that unfitness for duty on the part of the captain, like unse.tworthinees in the ship, might be pleaded, and that as it had not been pleaded, evidence to prove his unfitness could not be admitted. The tout, how ever, could not adopt that argument The question at issue was the proprist7 of the abandonment. If the act of aban donment was directed by an intelligent and imparisl mind, it might be justified in an action where an abandonment had taken pbice, and the question always was, what a prudent uninsured owner would have done under he circumstances. It was clear that the ionnilneiad the kadgmstit of the muter of the vessel who decided on the question of abandon:ll.n., was properly the only subject e f consideration. Lord Ten terden had ezpreuly laid down that doctrine, and it did not seem possible to exclude Item the inquiry the purer of the muter to form a sound judgment as affected, or not, by habitual intoxication. The defendants were, therefore, entitled here to show that the captain had not the means to exercise a sound judgment. The court thought the jury would not have c .me to a different conclusion if the a ci. dance comp Lined of as being excluded had bun received at the trial, and they were of opini-in that the verdict was full, warranted by the evidence which hail been Weil. The role must, therefore, be diesharged. COMMIT v. lIVDSON --PALI. IMPRISONMENT. Ia the ease which was a deasanrer t) the defwisat's pleas, sad whisk was argued a short tine age, the court gave ju , pleat Isr the dia.-adult. BLAND IP. LORD ALTANLIT.—ATTEMPT TO SIT ASIDE ♦N ANNUITY DIED. The Attorney-General (with whom was Mr. Maynard) showed cause against a rule calling on two persons, named Browse and nuttier, to show cause why a certain deed of annuity should not be a:t taide on the ground that at the time of it. execution a part of the considera tion money was retained or returned contrary to the statute, and that the pecuniary consideration for On, annuity had not been properly stated and duly en roiled. The defendant had hid by fur six years until some of the parJte concerned were dead, and the state• meats on which the application was made could not be con tradicted. There was, however, no ground for setting aside the annuity. The consieteration for the annuity (which was 1,4801. per annum) was 8,0001 , and the sum of 5,0001. was actisalig then paid in money, the def ndant owing Mr. Bland, to whom V.* annuity was granted, 3,000!. 1. r mon y pre viously advanced, and 233!. for money to keep up a policy of assuraac't on the life of the Duke of Beaufort, who was security for Lord Alvanley. It wax clear that the party bor rowing was broad to keep up the policy, and that a payment made by another person to discharge that duty was suffi cient to constitute a lawful debt; and, if so, both the sums were real dents, and Mr. Bland was entitled to have them satisfied. The statute only applied to sums which ware re tained under false pretences; here, on the contrary, every thing had been honest and fair.—Sir F. Thesiger (with whom were Mr. Butt and Mr. Patendurff) ennunded that if p.K of the consideration-money had been returned oe retained at the time of granting the annuity, the court had no discretion, but were bound to apply the provisions of the statute ; and if it did so, they must set aside the annuity. The defendant was qnite ready to pay what should be found due for principal and interest, but contended that he was entitled to have the annuity decd set aside.—The court de ferred Usk It. ,judgmenl BAIL COURT.—YMITZUDAT. Sitime to Baneo.—tlefure Mr. Justice Erls. THE QUIRE E. Ditotarr.—Tus TOOTING CHOLERA CASES. Mr. Ba!tontine (a summary of whose motion we gav yes. terdvy), raid that in this cs.se he had been given to under stand that his learned friend Mr. Lush had i motion to make, with which he would, perhaps, at Luce proceed, in order that ho (Mr. Bail Anna.) might proofed with hi. own motion. Mr. Ludt said that the application he was ahout to make was aroiinded on an affidavit, which the party was going im mediately to swear, and he requested that his motion might be allowed to ottrid over until that hail been done. His learned friend, Mr. Ballantine, however, was aware of the contents of the affidavit abaut to be str.rn. Mr. Baltantini said he was vex at all acquainted with the statements which the efitivvit on the ot.er ede would eon- It would be a matter of persnanl acteirmwilaiion to himself if his seemed friend would make his oppiiestion im mediately. It was not necessary to wait for the affidavit , as Mr. Lush could himself state the (dna which It was intended to contan. Mr. Lush then Lid that he had to mere the court either that he night be allowed to show eaue against Mr. Balm- THE EXPRESS. TUESDAY EVENING, JANUARY 30 1549. tine's ruk, or for a rule to quail, the writ or ie en., j . T o . rule of his learned friend was obtained lost Wednesday, and it called upon Mr. Wakley. the coroner for Middlesex, and also the guardians of the Holborn union, to show canes why upon Mr. D:ouet surrendering to the coroner's warrant which had been inued against him. and givinf security for Ms per. local appearance at the Central Criminal Court to answer the chirp or manslaughter, be should not be discharged out of cum, sly. lie was instructed to appear on behalf of the coro ner and to state that it wee on put Ho ground., and not from soy private moires, that Mr.jWakley wished to bring before the court certain objections, which he considered to be round, to the course of the present pr.mecling. The 'affidavit upon which he moved sated that the coroner's jury, after a full cansidireSon of the facts convected with the deaths of the parties uo -n whose both, s the it guest was held, had found a I verdict of manslaughter against hies Drouet. In enniegurnes of that decision, the coroner had issued his; war , nt agai-st Mr. Drouet, who, however, was studiously concealing him self ;land the officers, up to the present time, bad not been able to am st hint. He (Mr. Lush) submitted that Mr. Drouet, by his application, sought to put the court in this dilemma. He said If the court would admit him to bail then he would surrender ; but, if not, he would take his attunes of escaping. What security bad the public that Mr. Drouet would ever be tried at all if the court did not make him surrender to the warrant before be was admitted to bail ? Fur this rea son he contended that the coroner ought not to be called upon to return the depositions until Mr. Drouet was in custody. Mr. Justice Ere ra'd, after consulting the Registrar from the Crown office, that sitting in that court scone it was his duty in deciding upon the present core , to abide by the established practice which bud been settled by the full court. The officer et the court informed him that Mr. Drouet wag entitled to his certiorari, end he (the learned j udge] was of opinion that it wes • valid writ. With respect to the evil suggested by Mr. Lush, the course adopted he the court, in these eases, prevented such an occurrence taking place, be cause, before the rule could be argued, Mr. Drouet must surrender to the cot net's warrant. It appeared to him that the application war answered in every respect. Mr. Lush said he had dote all that it war his duty to do in submitting to the court the objection which he had men tioned, and the coroner had also done what he conceived to be his. Mr. Wakley war desirous of making it known that he was no party in giving Mr. Drouet any advantege over other persons similarly situated. Mr. Justice Brie held that the criminal law shoal 1 be im partially administered to all persons. It was upon that thot be considered the conduct which Mr. Drouet had pursued in respect of a public officer WU justified. Mr. Lush observed that this was an application by a party not in custody. Mr. Justice Brie replied, that it was only an sin.licatien of a party to be admitted to bail, and before Mr. Dv-tittle counsel could be heard in s epport of his role, that person must surrender and be in custody in respect of the warrant upon which be sought to be admitted to bail. Mr. Ballantir.e said he must now ask wheth' r Mr. Wakley intended to produce the depositions. Mr. Lush replied that he was rot instructed upon that point. He had, however, no doubt that Mr. Wakley would return them, as he wee most anxious to obey the command of the court. Mr. Ballantine said that according to the terms of the Ca tiorari which he had obtained last Wednesday, the at p were ordered to be returned peremptorily on Saturday morning last. As his lordship bad now decided upon his learned friend's motion, C.e depositions, if they were in court, should ha at ones forthcoming. Mr. Lush said of course the depositions wculd row be I returned, Lut a reaeonaLle time must be allowed for doing so. Mr. Bailantine did not think a reasonable time ought to be allowed ; the depositions ought to he in court. Ilis client was meet anxious to have the matter disposed of. Mr. Justice Erie remarked, that if a party discbeyed a writ of e rtiorari the person aggrieved by such a preceding might apply fur an attachment. Mr. Ballantine said in ordinary casts disobedience to a certiorari was not a matter of consequence, but as a Warraat was out against Mr. Drouet it was important to have this matter core into at once. Mr. Justice Erle : If your client sustains inconvenience, ke has the remedy I have mentioned. Mr. Ballantine, after consulting with Mr. Drouet's att..r ney, said he was dire cted to apply f r an amehment spinet Mr. Wall y.—Mr. Justice Erle inquired upon what affida vit t—Mr. Btllantine r-tplied Lion no efildavit, tut upon the whole funs as they were now baton the court.—Mr. Justico Brie said it wes necessary for Mr. Ballantine to have the affidavit of the pasty who served the rule upon the coroner. —Mr. Ballamino said he would attend to his lordship's Lug geetioL.—T... pr. Covricirs then dront:tel. COURT OF COMMON ELEAS.—YEsTEUDST. Sittings in Baran. WHITP. r. WWLRY. —COUNT Y COUST ACT. Mr. White now showed cause against a rule obtained on a former day, and calling upon the plaintiff in tt is c.so to bring in the record in order for the defendant to be at liberty to enter thereon a sugg. stints to deprive the plaintiff of his costs under the Coui,ty Court Aet. The action war tried before the Secondary of the City of London, when the plaintiff, a surgeon, re.iding at No. 1, W. etminster-bridee. road, Surrey, recovered a verdict of 21. 10a , being the amount of medicines rupplied by him to the defendant, clerk at the Union Club Rouse, Trafalgar-square. It 'o pened a small portion of the medicines were ordered and supplied at the plainti ff 's own house, and the residue delivered at the Union Club Rouse. The ground of the rule was that es the amount was less than 201. the action ought to have been brought in the Westminster Middlesex County Court, within the jurisdiction of which court the Wei dent lived. The learned coon el in showing cause finely objected to the sufficiency of the affidavit on which the rule was obtained, as not du tinctly negativing the first and third exe.ptions (where a plaintiff is still entitled to sue elsewhere firth in the elun'y court), to to found in the 12Sth steam of the County Court Act. It enacts, " All actions which, bekne the passing of this act, might hare been brought in any superb r court where the plaintiff dwells more than twenty miles from the defendant, or where the cause of action did not arise wholly or in some muterial point, within tee jurisdiction of the court within which the defendant dwells or carries on hi* tel.-thou at the time of action brought, or where any ofne- r of the county court shell be a party, may be brought in any such superior court at the election of the putt suing." In the present instance the affidavit did net state in the pest tense that defendant dwelt within the jurisdiction of the Westminster County Court at the time of action hrought, but cnly to this 'free, " was and is emp!eyed, dwells and carries on his business there " A similar objecton areiied also to the allegation that neither pleintiff nor defendant was an officer of the County Court. Moreover, it was submitted upon the merits of the case that the words " wholly or in some material point." in the re lion above referred to, meant wholly or in same material point pervading the whole cause of action. If, thendere, any material part of the plaintiff's claim arose el esthete then within the district within which the defendant dwelt at the time of ne'ion brought, the plaintiff was not confined by the statute to suo in the county court of teat district. Then in the present case some of the medicines havieg been supplie d in Surrey and out of the jurediction of the Westminster County C not, the plaintiff was rot bound t. ine in such court. Tee proper interpretation of the section in this respect was a question of great importance, and had never yet been decided.—Mr. Js yce, iu support of the contended affidavits were not to be scanned with the stricture' of pleadings, end it was out fich ntly awed in the present instance that, at the time of action brought, she defendant dwelt within the jurisdiction of the county court, sod that neither of the parties wee an effieer of that court. With regard to the third objection, which went to the meats, the scope and object of the act ought to hr looksd to, and if the construction contended fur on tae ether side were to prevail, the operation of the Count) Court Act world be very much euetatied. He sub meted the words " acme material point " meant some portion of the whole cleim. Such a construction would clone give a fair operation to the act. Tho pre ise point was now under the consideration of the Court of Exchequer in the case of" Woad th Perry." The court said it was not neces sary for them to give an opinion upon the general point, which was one of great importance, and might require deep consideration. In their jndiment the affidavits were insufficient on the greeted of the techoical objections erred to them, and the rule must therefote be disenarged.—Rule COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Yerritimv. bitting, in Santo. MARKHAM R. HOPRINS.—A MASTER'S TAXATION or COSTS WILL NOT BS RILVIRWED RICEPT IT APPEALS CLEARLY HE WAR It ERROR. Tais was a rule calling on the plaintiff to show cause why tle master she aid not review his taxation undo r tie follow ing circumstances :—Tke action was brought against a pro visioaal committeemen of a railway for services renderer by the plaintiff. It was called on and disposed of as an unde fended cause, before Lord Denman, at the last Warwick alai x, F. In the course of te-e same day the attorney and witnesses of the defendant arrived. The cause of their non-attendance i in time was represented to . the learned judge, who p ermitted the cue to be reinstated in the list upon the dcfen ant's at torney personally undertaking to pay all the costs incurred by reason of the postponement of the trial On the fol lowing Saturday it was called en again and tried, red a verdict was returned for the plaintiff about 3 o'clock in the afternoon. Upon the taxation now objected to, the Master allowed each of the plaintiff's wit nesses a guinea a day for tavern expenses far the day the cause was tried and for the following Sunday and Monday.— Mr. Whitehurst, Q.O , who supported the rule, s onteiided that that allowance was exorbitant and unreascu :ble. The witnesres lived within reach of their residences, which were principally at or near Northampton, and they could have re turned to their homes oo the very day the trial took place. IThere was a train direct from Warwick to Northampton, about 6 o'clock on the Saturday. The trial was concluded several hours before, acid there was not the smallest neosesity for their remaining in Warwick until Mon day. If they chose to do ar, the Muter should not have allowed for their expanses —Mr. Rumfrey, Q C., who appeared to show cause against the rule. set witted that there was not sufficient time for the a itneyes' departure after the trial, and before the train left Werwiek. They were staying at an botel,and,uponreaching it after the termination of the trial, they bad not time enough to make the necessary arrangements for their j•urney before the hour at which the train started. They therefore declined to leave on the Satur day, although they were asked to do ,o.—The Court would not interfere with the Master's decisint, unless it appeared clearly be was in error. That did rot appear in this c.l'. A I IktS , n able time otieht to be allowed winless's to reach titeir homes after the termination of a trial, and their expenses for that time should be allowed. It necessarily varied according to circumstance, hut it was a matter peculiarly f.tling wtthin the jurisdiction of the taxing officer to determine. The witimmes in this ease should be allowed time to peek up their clothes and refresh themselves. The Master was the proper juige whether they hat had suffhieut time for doing ac after the trial terminated and be f tie the departure of the train. He decided thet Olt y had not, and that they were, therefore, entitled to their expenses. The court assumed that he determined tightly after investi gating all the facts, and the rule to review his tit:Whin must, therefore, be die:target!, the cots to be paid by the defend ant's attorney. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. 1111118TUIL—WO recently stated that 0 e esse of " John Palmer," indieted for illegally keeping the Psrthenium Rooms, was, with others, postponed till a future day. This was an error ; the owe of Mr. Palmer was finally disposed of, an acquittal having bF n returned by the jury. POLICE.—YeteTERDATe OUILDIIALL.—"A CARE or DISTRESS."—A respectably attired female handed a letter for Alderman Muenovo's perusal respecting the character of the man Jaques, whose cutlet attem ' as suicide a was reported under the above head ing iu the Expr ess of the 18th. The letter, which w signed " ttray, 17, Ironmonger-street, St. Luke's," stated that Jaques had lodged in her house the latter part of 1847 and a great part of 1848, eluting which period she found hint in board and lodging. Fur this he ran up a bill to the , amount of 71. 75., promising to pay as soon as he got a shoa -1 tion ; and he liaewise induced her husband to become secu rity to a loan society for 61., and left them to pay it; but being unable to do so, in consequence of her husband, who is a baker, being out of employment and very ill till a short time since, the society was now proceeding against them. Jaques chained two or three situatioes, but never had the honesty to attempt to r pay one farthing. After that he re velled upon a female servant to lend him 201., with which he took an eel-pie house in Barbican, and instead of being turned out by the landlord as he had stated, ho absconded after selling some of the materiels, and with the remaining portion of the money got married,: and, lastly, excited the sympathy et the puldie in his be.halt by what the writer con steered ash im attempt at suicide. OA Saturday night last, being short of money, and not wishing that her husband should go to prison, she called at Jaques' lodgings for the purpos' of asking for a trifle of what was due, when she saw Mrs. Jaques, who refused to do anything and put her at defi ance. She (Mrs. Rattray) and her husband had relieved Jaques when they then selves were in want. It was, therefore, that, known; his character, and seeing that he was receiving money from the court, she came there on public grounds, as she con,idered benevolent individuals ought not to be fur ther imposed upon.—Alderman Iduszrove said he did not doubt fin a moment that she had acted most kindly towards hint and had received a most ungrateful return. He was of cpinion that, in all cases of suicide, the culprit cught to be tried by a jury, and let them judge of his character and mo tives ; and he also much lamented that charitably-disposed persons did not send their contributions for the benefit of the pour-boxes of the different courts, when they would be die peened properly, instead of for the use of ;ndividuels.— Alderman Musgrove coasidered Mrs. Rattray's conduct very creditable. Ile should order her Se. out of the poor-box Mrs. Rsttray thanked the alderman for his kindness and re tired. WORSHIP-STREET. --HIGHWAY ROTIBERY.—.I. Flavin was charged with having robbed and maltreated J. Lenard, who had sustained such serious injuries that his life was in danger.—At one o'clock on Sunday morning a policeman found the prosecutor stretched upon the pavement on Whitechapel to all appearance lifeless, with his pockets turned out, gad bleeding copiously from a wound at the back of the head. Tae only person near him at the time was a little bey, who told the policeman that the man had been attacked by a party of thieves, who had rifled his pockets and afterwards knocked him down and left him In the condition described. The injured man was conveyed tee the hospital, where he had since remained in too bewildered end st.ffering a state to be able to furnish any particulars of the outage. Such as accurate description of the most active of the wounded man's assailants was afforded by the bey who witnessed the attack as left no doubt of hie identification with the prisoner, who was traced to a low lodging-house Io the neighbourhoo d.—J. Lee, the lad referred to, stated that he was returning from an errand fir his father at the time in question, when he observed the prisoner and three other men lurking at the corner of Wentwerth-street, and the pro ' secutor having come up at the moment the primmer sprang out, and seizing hold of him, made some demand, to which the other replied that he had not a farthing about Lim. The prisoner then pr ceeded to rifle his packets, and dragged him up the iitreet and dashed hint down upon the pavement, where he lay without motion until the police came up, the prisoner and his companions having in the meen time ef fected the escape.—A medical certiiimte was put in, which gated that b .ides the wound in his head, which was of a serious character, the prosecutor sustained several contusions over the face and temple.—The poisoner war remand for a week; and as he was leaving the bar he assailed the wit ness with the most violent threats and imprecations, which he vociferously kept up until he was removed by main force to the cede CLBRKENWELL—CHARGE OF ROTIDERT AGAINST AN Aoavr AND Seavairoa.—Me. H. England, house end estate agent, appraiser, curveyor, &c., of Calcdcnia-road, Islington, was charged with having stolen 60 toes 4 cwt. of Derbyshire stone, value 1001. and up cards. Mr. A. S. Spark.e deposed that he carried oe the teueinnis of an imvorter of stones in conjunetiim with Mr. Garland, of the Regent's Canal. On Thursday morning they missed the property from their wharf, and they found that it was deposit. d in a barge at the wharf of lletars. Curtis. Thornhill Bridge, Islington. In consequence of information ho received, witness pro ceeded to the prisoner's residence, and asked him if ho had not a quantity of stone. He said he had, or expected it, if is had not been lost in the River; that patty had been to him in reference to such atone from Lett's.wherf to Dl' ens. Curtis's, and be (prisoner) expected tic had sold it again. Witness inquired waat he was to give for it, and from whom he had received it or purchased it. He replied, " From Line;" hut he would not say what he had agree Ito give for it. Witness said it was his stone, end had been takeu from the wharf ; and he served him with a written notice not to put with it, or pay any money of account. He aubsequently saw the prisoner, when he said be had purchased the atone for 1001. He woul i act upon witness's no ice, and would not pay Line, and he wee de an appointment to wet Lim on the frlowing day, when he would give' Nether information, when the prisoner produced a receipt, i urportieg to to W. Lines's, for 1001. and odd, es received from the pri over ler stone • and, on the bark, were two memorandums of di ff erent dat es, stating a deposit of two diff rent some of from 21. to 51., es part payment of the 1001. The prisoner said, " 1 have not paid the money, and I shall act upon your notice."—Mr. Wakeling, jun., for the prisoner, produced an invoice for the stone, and asked the witness whether it was not in his hendwritieg.— fie admitted that to be the fact.—Mr. Combo perused it t.nd said that on the very face of the proceeding it was au accept ance fur three months —Witness said that Line repreeented 'hat he conld fl d a purchaser for the stone, and they ported with the property t' him—Mr. Coerbe said it was evitently a tile from wit-cos to Line.—Witness said there ought to hove been a transfer ne twithetaneting that epezies of invoice. —Mr.O ititle said it was a fraud between dparke" and another iartyto dt mu.' sour body. Line was the port, who ought to comp.ain. He discharged the prisoner, who left the court with his frie. MARLBOROUGH STREET.—Ronnenees AT 1300K STALLII.—H. fyilliasns was cherged with having stulen a number of books belonging to Mr. Diprese.—The prosecutor said he received information that the prisoner had stolen a bcek from his atoll, and caused him to be detained, when four volumes fell from boneath his coat.-3. Sullivan said he saw the prisoner steal a book from the prosecutor's stall, and he went into the shop and gave information of the eir cumetance.—Mr. Diprose said the present made the third time has atoll had been robbed that day.—The prisoner made no def. see, and was fully committed. BINEVOLENCE.—The half of a 61. note, from " A Lady," tor the Door box, has been received. MARYLEBONE.—RIOT IN THE ST. MARTLEBONE STONETARD.—D. Casey, J. Marshall, J. l'ickley, W. Harn net, and J. Reynolds, employed as stone-Weaken in the Mars lebone stoneyard, were charged with a riot and an attack on the police. On nide, last Casey, owing to some misconduct on his part, was interdicted by Mr. &ace, the surveyor of pavements, from pursuing his usual labour, and lon Saturday when he (Mr. Sate) went to the yard, be found him there ; he told him to memo's the stone", when, in an ' impudent manner, he desired him to measure them himeelf ; he used language of a moot threatening nature towards Mr. Seace whom he swore he would waylay. He was given into co-tally, brought to this court, andremanded. -It was shown that wide Casey was being taken from the yard, the rest of the stone-breakers quitted their work, and • mow of the most alarming character ensued • the object of the party was to obtain the liberation of Casey , whom they in cited, by every means in their power , to offer eta s•soce, and lee him to believe that they were powerful enough to rescue him. Stones of • large size and great weight were flung in all directions a: the constables, several of whom were much injured, and i.cd they not remained with their barks towards their assailants some would most probably have lost their lives. One of the prisoners flourished a sh , .,vel over his head, saying, with an oath, he should like to break Mr. &ace's skull. They were at length secured, ..nd conveyed to the station-house.—Two or three constables produced their hats, which had been cut through by stones which were flung at them with tremendous force.—Four of the prisoners, and two others agaicst whom warrants are now out, were clearly proved to have teen the principals in the affray. Fifty out of 1.50 er 200 stone-breakers were pelting the police at one time.—The magistrate inquired of the gentlemen who attended from the vestry whether it was their wish for the ease to pa to the sessions or not ?—Mr. Potter replied that it would be better to punish the parties summarily.—Mr. Broughton sentenced Casey to 14 days, and the rest of the prisoner' to one month, with hard labour. WESTMINSTER.—Toartuateta A CHILD TO EXTORT CUARITT.—Hannah Kelly was charged with begging, and with cruelty to a little child —Mr. W. Williams mid that he was passing through Pelham-crescent, Brempton, when the defendant solicited alms of him. At the time he first ob served the woman the child with her was perfectly quiet, but when he got abreast of her, the child gave a loud scream, and was quiet again almost directly he had passed. He watched the defendant foe several minute s, and when there was no one near the child was quiet, but the ntoment a lady or gentleman approached, the child again screamed. Wit ness went for a policeman, and found that two ladies who hid also ()heaved her conduct were in quest at in officer in order to give her into custody. The defendant idol the child was her own.—Mr. Broderip expressed his regret tho.t ho had not the power to take the poor little thing away from her. He entertained not the 'lightest doubt that the deeadent was • profess - .d beggar, and one of the very wor: kind. lie regretted that the law Gil not allow him to inflict a greater pinishisient, as he bad no doubt that she was in the habit of tormenting the poor child, that by its cries she might the better extract money from the benevolent passers by. He committed Der for one month to bard labour. SOU CHWARK.—Tnnowito • MAN INTO TUE RIVEN Kra, ht was brought up from the station-house at the rear of this court, where he had been for lame home, hey• ling been previously taken out of the river.—V, fireman, belonging to the Mating fire-ecgine moored off the South wark.bridge, stated that while an boar.l that morning about 3 o'clock, he heard the cries of some one in distress at some distance off, and a splashing of water. He rowed towards the spot from whence the noise proceeded, and taw a man struggling in the river and holding on a plank, but he was in such an exhausted condition when witness got there, that he must have sunk in a very short time. Witness dragged him into his boat, and he was taken to the station-house, where he stated that he had been in the city with some friends, and on his Ii return home, while walking along Sankside be was stewed by two men, one of whom asked him for some t money, which he refused to give, and that immediately upon his refusal, he had his watch forcibly seized from his pocket, I and on Isle resisting, being near the river side at the time, y hie t- o assailants pushed him off Bank.ide Etta the water, and left Lim to struggle for his life. Knight subsequently said that his watch had not been taken from him, for ne hat not one in his pocket at the time. With the c xception of this part, he repeated the ab .ve statement to the magistrate. —Mr. Cottiogham said the police would no noubt endeavour to discover the perpetrators of such a desperate act. LA MBETEL—Ritrusixo TO ALLOW A PAUPER TO 00 ro Cituncu.—et pauper complained of the con.'uct of the officers of Camberwell Workhouse, in having refused to ad mit him into that establishment on the preceding nizht.— The applicant stated that on the evening b fore he asked permission to be allowed to atteni his place of worship, the catholic chapel, and his request was refused. He would ad mit he kfe use house contrary to the ordets of the officers, and en hie return, although he brought a written certificate from the Rev. W. Talbtt, one of the clergymen, of the lac. of his having been to chapel, he was refuted admittance, and compelled to walk the streets all night.--Mr. Elliott told him that if he wilfully violated the regulations of the workhouse he must abide the consequence, as he (Mr. Elliott) had no power to interfere in the matter. WANDSWORTH.—DISTURBING A CONGREGATION.— _ Mr. Burchard, the churchwarden of Sc. Ann's Courch, Wandsworth, applied to Mr. Deadens for his advice.—He Ic stated that for some time past the Sunday evening service at if St. A ,se's Church had been interrupted by the assemblage of a number of young men and boys, who persisted in jesting s and laughing during divine service, much to the annoyance 1, of the congregation. He had, as warden, himself turned several of these fellows out of the sacred edifice, and in. structed his beadle to do the same, but they remained in the churchyar..l; and,by loud wh is tling and other noises, made a greater disturbance than they did in the church.—Mr. Beadon said he could not take oogeisance of any disturuance in a church, it was entirely a matter for ecclesiastical inter ference, and not of a criminal court. He aloud, advise an application to the superintendent of police for assistance. on being maoved from the church, one of the parties com plained of offered the slighte:t violence, the warden ha 1 only to summon him, and Mr. Beadon would inflict the extreme penalty for the assault.—Mr. Burchard expressed his thanks, and left the court. RICHMOND.—CIeaIIOES or FOSLOIRT, EMBEZZLEMENT, AND OBTAINING GOODS LIBBER FALSE PHETENCRS.—G. C. Montresor, late a butler in the service of Mr. S. Briggs, was finally examined, charged with forgery, embezzlement, and obtaining goods under false pretences.—A poice b rgeant stated that, on the 14th of March last, he receiv:ol Informs, lion from Mr. Briggs that the prisoner, who had been in his service for about two years, had absconded, after robbing him I to a large amount. He had been on the look tut for him ever since, and succeeded in apprehending him a few days back, in couscquence of seeing a report of a ease from one of the nr tropelitan p,lioe courts, where be had been charged „ with breaking some windows, and was committed to Cold- t bath-fields in default of paying the amount of damage. The 1 police sergeant proceeded to, the prison, paid the amount, and ' released the prisoner, and then apprehende him on the above charge.—The first cese taken was that of obtaining two portmanteaus from Mr. J. Trice, a saddler. This offence was committed on the day the prisoner absconded, and he took them with him. The false pretence was that Mr. Briggs was going into the country.—The next caw was that of ob. Veining a quantity of wine from Mr. C. Ellis, a wine mer chant, at Richmoud.—A. B. Flume, clerk to Mr. Ellis. mated that Mr. Briggs had been in the habit of dealing with his master, and the prisoner being known as his butler. no Is, ci tation was felt at executing his orders. On the 22nd of April, 1847, the prisoner ordered a bottle of holland., and a b Istle of marsala. On the 29th he ordered half a doe nof marsala. On the 10th of June, and 16th of October, separate bottles of marsala ; and his excuse for having a single bottle was, that it won wanted for dinner, as Mr. Briggs being out they could not get to the wine cellar. On various otoer occa.ions the prisoner had ordered port, champagne, end manual% wines, half a doe-n at a time.—Mr. Brings said he hail never authorised his butler 01 any one oc casi.n to order wine in his name. He iad t' e greater part of his seine from tows, ; but on one or two occasions he had had same of Mr. Elba. and had paid for it at the time.— 'I he next case was one of forgery and embezzlement. The prisoner had made out several surreptitious bills, purporting to come from Mr. Giles, a 11,-master, had received the money to discharge them, and then forged the signature of Mr. Giles, or some person presumed to be in his , mploy.— Mr. T. F. Gil , s said the bill produced for 41. 16: 6 , 1. was not in his handwriting. and the signature T. F Giles" was not his: neither did he know anything of either of the two other bills p;oduccd.—Mrs. C. Briggs proved that she gave several sums of money at different periods to the prisoner, and received from him the receipted bills produced.—The prisoner was committed on each of the above charges seise. rately.—Sergemt Fiolayson said the prisoner I:ad a key to the cellar, asd one of his transactions was the substi tution of too dozen of British champagne for two dozen of foreign, and the British wine had not been paid for. MONEY MARKET. MONDAY EVENING. The funds exhibited a remarkable instance of mu tability to-day. At the latter end of last week they were al. ascendant, and prices with scarcely a pause, or a momentary retrogradation, cis ng higher and higher. Towards the elcoe of business on StPurdly, however, the more sagneicus of the spiculruive dealers were seized with come misgivings about the solidity or the permantncy of the hasty co. - tinnous movement upwards, and began to take their measures accordingly for getting out, of some of their stock. This morning the unfavourable tenor of the news from Paris led to a reduction at once of 3 per cent. on the opening of the market upon the last and before declining rates of Saturday. Consols could not obtain more than 91, and did not long maintain that rate, although they fluctuated between 90; and 91; for a short time. S ill later Console became sellers at 90 . 4. To wards the close of business they recovered in some degree, and left off at 90; to for bath money and account, say ut arly 11 below the highest quotations of Saturday, with a market but ind ifferentas to tone. The coenplexion of the news from France has excited eenr:relly more serious apprehensions for the maintenance of order in that country than any event., or series of evrnts, which has occurred since the June insurrections; and private advises indicate that the more respectable classes, who had been partially re assured for come time past by the appearance of re turning tranquillity, were again taking the alarm accordingly, and becoming extremely anxious for the security of property, if not of life. It was statei to day that already some considerable remittances of money had been received, or were on their way, for sate lodgment here under the influence of these uneasy feelings. Reduced Three per Cents. closed at 901 to I. Three-and-a-Quarter per Cents., 91 to t. Long Annuities, 8: to 15-16. March Exchequer Bills, 445. to 475. prem. India Bonds, 48s. to 50s. prem. Bank Stock, i 93 to 194. The sort of panic in the funds extended to, and was experienced in, foreign securities in an equal, and with respect to the fancy stocks, in almost a greater degree. Mexican fell to 241 to 51. Peru vian to 47 to 9. New Granada, to 141 to 15. Vene zuela, to 19 to 20. Brazilian, without transactions, were called 78 to 80, as before. Chilian, 90 to 2. Spanish Fives declined to 141 to 13 ; the Threes to 27! to 8; Passive to 31 to 1. Portuguese to 261 to 71. Dutch Two-and-a-Half per Cents. to 481 to 9; the Fours to 77/ to 81. French Five pa ant. ltentes were sold at 731; exchange, 23f. 40c. ENGLIBII FUNDS. Bunk Flock, 194 3 Om/. ter Acct., 91 901 It 901 4 I 3 pet CI. BAAL Amu. 911 4 90f 901 3 pet Ct. Cont. Amt., 91* 901 j liteNcquer DUB. 4.1. , 00. 2! ,4 . New 31 pa I. Atm., I'2 1 11 21 61. Itar.. 45 74; ed.., June, 50, 4&, ^4 Annuillts, exp. Jam, 5,1600, Ditto OK `2%,1,. Bluth, 467 4 8 5.16 India 'Sonde, 11040, 60 Ditto, under 41,000, 41 24., Junt. Mt!) buall, :4., June, 48. FOREIGN FUNDS 6 per Ct. Chllkm Eds., 91 5 rer Ct. Spanish Bds., die. from 24 per Ct. Dutch Ecuador, 12 Nor. 1640, 141 God., 3 2i 4 Ditto Passive Dd.. 34 1 per Ct Greuada Bonds. 141 115 3 per Ct. Spaniab 271 5 per Ct. Mexican, 1816. 251 65 4j 21 per Ct. Venezuela Hoods 19 Ditto, Amount. Feb. 15, 251 1 5 per Ct. French Heine., 7N. bk. 6 per CL Peruvian ILIa 43 71 9 es. 2Sf. 40c. 4 per Ct. Portuguese Bonds, 211 21 494 per Cad. Dutch Etch., 120u1L, til 2 9 Ditto Met., 274 4 per Lt. Dutch Certif.. 784 74 81 EXCHANGES AND 6TOCEB ABROAD. HANSOM, JAN. 26.—Hanererian Flee pee Cent5.,10041034 ; Rusian- English Loan, 100 991 ; Ditto, in Corti ~ hessian Flee per Cents., 91*; Ditto Sour per Costal. 03; Yruadan Eta PF Cents.. 1001 10% ; Mean Two-ande. Cent.. 444: unn - Engihh Loan, Three per Cent.. 64164; Ditto, 1001. dans, 66 651 ; Swedish Four per Cents., 96 ; Ditto, Transport Low, 93 ; Notweet , Four per Cents., 96196 ; Spanish F t pee Cent.. (.W 0114 4. 9 2 aCt Ditto Three pm Cents. ifeland) 191 19 ; American Sin per Cents.. 103 103. Exchanges : Hamburg. lm. 26, light. 1194; Ditto two 'weighs. 1 181; Leask. Jen. 24, two mouths, 0.2644; Bremen, Jan. 21, two months, 006; Frankfort, Jan. 23, sight, 1204 ; Ditto two months. 1234 ; Berko. Jim. 25, three months, 6.25. Beaus, Jae.24.—Yire per Cent Prussian Loas.loll 16W ; S. &hold. Sch. Threeend-s.lfalf per Car a, 79j 74. Foreign Exchanges: Os London, 6.26 ; Hamburg, 151, 1514 ; two mouths, 1300 ; Part'. 814. RAILWAY NEWS.--MospAy. 'Ti to I Shares followed in the wake of Conwils, ai.d prices have been nearly all in decline, with lew buyers. Towards the close of the market there WIZ a sight recovery, but with little aeimathat in the dealings. SUARE LIST.—LONDON. JANU•ItIr 29. ;OM qu .&Won, of Kam to ROMIII ACt4.ll don to actu a l ID trar.actkoko: those of Um in Italics belles' prior, SO Aberdeen . it 9) 60 Lon '.on k A.Wertara 0 4( ,ftwberid H irt : . .I ;;;;;;; 424 . Do. New. 11. . .... it; 16,6 ; 19 lik.lVoi., Dud.eullt,),, ~.j . , 34 I DO. 1 . 410 40). , 0 44 . do.pd.or wf.•llllw.' " """ SO i Do. Com Testdis.64 10 Do-do.wiNuntitunr , 69. 40 ' Do. do. Tad At.. .u IL 134 all Wet of: 8.6 affge 104 11 16 I o. Thirds. - • 1 14 10 %rot. ot Or. Jo. ••• 1 ;4 ~,,,4 6 1, I Do.N.Pret. 7 261.1 1 dy.pd.er trf. a goer.' ".. ... 1 onDep.6o;oueel 44 10 Du.dottithoodowat. 24 11 Low.,Salloo. it rosel* 444 6 Iloston•dtain•kMrm. 44 4 Man.. Boat t Nat 4 1 4 kJ i Briefed and Exeter.. 24 216. r Monch.,Sl4l.*Loor .$ DTI Do. Thirds.. .....5V 104 18 ' Do. i Mara NO. . 1 kik Bueklnglamiltnn... 24 9,. 01 i De. 4 ekara. . If & z.; te ' Lyikdonias ... .. 261 44 51 10 I Do. 140 w fli! Pref I 1 1141 Do. 4 chafes ... -44 6 40 c/loOLOrm.kebeff.. le 74 uo.kle orLfefenee 81 4 103 Midland.. :&4 6 144 60 Mester a ilayama 4s :4 1001 Do. (A.. E.,41 l e 4 4 I Do. Preference • • 144 7 5 I Do. folllhalrOA 411 61 DirectLon.croass4. 1100: D*Lirms. & !kik,: . a ''. 36 'Dublin & Belfast du. 6 6 1100; Do.C.Hrt.klit.94s 6 i Ss i1faA1N261.L164.1.k11 4 1 41 Mid. ULlVeet Oriel: ; Li ; Do. den. E. k 11.1.. 3 ,50 Ilifkfictiltd.qpCia 361 Do. (11.194.14.C.P1f 2 I 4 100 Newintik & earka 00 ' 6:astern Countlee • • 1 4 I IN orth Ortiasb 1414 10 I Do-North:tar 043 CA UN eli D0.E5t.6906N0.1 b. ' f',7,..r.'"`" 4 .1 TTi 62. Do. do. .No 2 ip. I Do. afr:s1;:: 31 99 D ) .avvrii:satipci St Do Thir.s 60 Do.. do., S i. Goa 63 65 1:111 Norfolk . . 1f f 1 , 14 14/. * .hang l4 135 1 : Do. .Irse 201 l, 44 . 411 Do. do. New 1 Jp. 6 : Do. do Gatar.bire ; 1 11 26 garbs* UAW% (LA . go I loo.flusful.6 1., Is 2-2 Le- de- • •LIIII pl 5 13d. :20 , 1/4.24lerfft WO: * • Do. do. --.. C a 13 I /1. ft(' d per t 5,,, 283 , Du.do..Bero dr , t 16* i s : 123.efh ic...914. Wester.. ••• Is. li N. -rte otaffor.mblre. iti ii in U . East ihA es ; n 4 l4istie 1 . 194 01 . .Worcot.kWoh. 4 6 .3 ''''. 21_I De. Asa 44 Vd. 1 34 &ad. °vol., is ltti, .is 4., I Do. I Mar& .. ,• 14 Id. I 2 'Rolston nasti llitcbutu ' • 64 Do.o 4) mitt:sow, ii 9. 99 &own& Cent.ral .... * 26 East IJacolushire 60 Edinburgh & 61411*.:41 43 114 acil.koth.,ol4.D.D .u . 30 1 Do. + sham ~. •VI 4•1. 9 tilnors.3. Mr dm* •,. 24'1 , .4eter, Icovii,Dlre. If M. 16 ; I' .'IQ. ..... . ;4. Ma 6:4,6 radd liaised& • I ' Po. do. N;te oar. 1. ; la 19 *heat beriberi .- .l g 461 ska , 919 rea,,,kaa, 9 . . 1 , 1 •:, 1211 Do.do. s A &Writ 9 De. Mares 611 D0d0.4 114p4r01.1 i 441! Do. 4 stdestri 24; Do. Extension .... S 1 : Do. Noe ; 40 •GLlowll4W..oltiretlll 10 ; 8. 11 . 0irot0;i3 . 1:11 •• • '4j 105 . GLNorthoi &atoms's. 6IA ire Union ..1 :A 40 Do. Noe KC l4O ' Devon__ ;If 25 Do. do 63 Idp• IL I Do l'rtlerew .es. . 04 Do. Now. &X • • 111 7. South titatfurkblusa :44 14 Do. Now, 151. •..• 14 334 : dosth Eastten ;- .. !Di 1 a LO,Orszt Wasters.-- • : 49 14 ;D. do No.; 10 74. E 50 I Do. thmsds.....• FP 111 Do. do Ne. 1. 1 124 . • 13 IDo ,Isara V o l 1 so Do. d , •-••-- • • • .2 10 i Do. do. Raid-- 4.4 55 Do. New 174. : , 0 Noll dad Sabi ••• •'IOI 103 123 _ IlesatbWales... . 14 la is 26 I Do. taunt 94 614 . 6 8 Yorl6,Pookt . dual. : 4 4 444. 1211 Do. 4 41: fu Ltne. and u' erl s l• l4 • • 613 4 434 Waterid.l Ltateri..i. " ' Do. Thirds -....hird & rolls& 26 • Da. do ...... ..... 53 •12 15d. : 10! Do. do. 9 Id. 444 .121144.n0.a. &Worn, 24 ..., 19 Wm 4 : Dux& ll' - ..._ _ . no.;, ..,,.: .9.ra: - ottgl Do. 1111th... : •-• • 'ft 9 96 York. Nese.. & Orr. •, , ,t i 1 Do. Sialecniitr... .It 044. 66 ! Door.;.N met's., vi Do, Thir • ....., to 6 90 : DoLtNolY 14 N•R. Li i Do•NerrUlccc•aPl 7 1 3, 1 lip. 19 DoduNozN w.ilso. ..1 li 1 Do. W. B. 1 . 499 *. 6i : : • DoONEl'arorP , o , ~, " JoAPrortona Wry 94 60 'York& Nth.l4lalhatt :44 91. Do. irkano .. , .41 W. 10 ilc • Alt 9,7 cc :, 114 69 Goods and Bradford 100 26 • Do 11.&10.11.1.1.:•Et ~,,, i Ile Lvdo out Turd 40 W. do. Nor ••• • Da 11. ,6 Anglo-hole in.... 4/ ra 71 Lkodo Prcf.apffa i :29 lhologuanulAaal * Ti i , t Lis. Crool4. a &ad& :17 Cen.0.114.10(.4Vab. iv ;4. ./ 1 : 9099 a k Blackwa 6 4i 6 .16 Of 1 ner ,,, o 11, Do. Examsioa. - . : 11 Dutch it4e015a........4 lit Lon ,linthtonta•ew• 164 i6l ' 7 Lasellawarl7. ••• - • 41 i-id. 00.thdar. 6 per 1 . , . 991 :40 . Illtve ~ • • .4 )o.Prr,ferem.Sp.et. 49 61 il . Namur and Lied: . o 4 . 10.L9w.ap.1.9.491.3 49 64 ,17 Northern of Front ;I io I Dn.:SwF:4ow pot 11 6 ; 7 Brims & Boniaut .21 Indon and Oreenw.pf .1.1 Path coat L0u.... .. . .._ . I . . . Do. Praferoie....; 'id DT Xi. .. . ... .. Isi a i. Ionsilon& N. Wader& 131 21 Intro end Orfr.dic d* z Do.Q.pirs. 1.. é 8.1 10p. '.O ' Pali. and HOU. II:, Do. N...i. ..... ...111 g g I 9 . Paris a tgraskoorpi7 .4g., Do. Fifth, ..... ... A $3 Room and ilavro . 1.1 i 9 14.401. einires.oJ., Iti Ilainbra awl Metre 1! Do.lo/..11..11 & B all, 14 'Strasbourg& title . Do lidah.dl &Bb 13 I 9 ! r NW. Opel 1, , 14' , .. 74. Holarh.. Ma He 41 . ig. in.,. 1v.1.1.rs . ,• :4., Utissoito, Jas. DL—Banalion Darien.lol . .. ol ! Ditto, Priorlq Ram 100 We ; Limburg, on W ; Ditto, Pitorttzr ; C dm*. 79 .4 7 . 54 ; Ditto, Muth, Way, ; Mockisnhio m 4 361 Alton; its; Nt; Uluokstadt. 26 ; tO atom Nash :Idiom MISCELLANEOUS NEWS. LONDON AND Boma Sy,u.oliA, the I/O%OIIIMM eta of rallwa\e, invested the ext , n , ion line to 11autoon hurt .110 iod inated his satioartion ift the state 01 the wattii. The hie will be opened to the public un Tiatrad 4y, there is to be a seine° of tiro trains a dir. PUBLIC SALES. JAN. D.—By Mr. J. J. ORGILL, at Gars w:1 'A.— Piece of pound situated between Prirker-street and Upper Starnfo , d.street, Lambeth, containing dwelling-hmse, workshop, otsblos &c ; held for 364 }ears anew. ed, at a ground rent of 71., and let for :he whole term at 731. per a. num; sold Tor 64.41. Two leasehold bouses,Corawall-r-ad, Lambeth, with tea tenements in the rear; It tat nom producing 871. to. per annum, ono held for 254 years unesp.r..d, et 131.1.:.'e. ground rent, and subject to taw amounting to 121. 3s. tki. per annum ; Mill. COMMERCIAL AND MA REETS. PRODUCE. -91'9cl:co LANZ, JAII. 29. -The public rates of sugar for twraorrow (Tuesday) are again rather large, ray 14,000 bags 01 Mauritius and Cant India and 150 Lbds. Wei.; India; but there resins to be great confidence in the article, end, if tie is. porter. , continue to give the same Puppet tto tie market no they Old lent week, them will be no fear of a dieline.--'3atton ban been in good demand the list two dap ; about 2,300 bales sold at fall ernes to a abode iidvaice.-Tanow ban declined to ella. Town, 436.; irngh fa, 2s. 31d. Arrived during last week, 851 casks ; delivered. I,odecaks; the present rock on baud is 34,861 casks; at *be mine tone lot yew it sees tc,she casks.-Provisions. butter : Irish Was been doll of see at Saturday's prices; foreign of every ili noriptiari in thilcult al sale, and inferior aorta have been forced od from 51s. Ito 645., which were very low peens. - B eon, of good quality, has been improved and quoted In. dearer heart in fair demand. Ihe clock on hand is sandl.-einnunin: A small put of the quantity offered sold at 2d. to 4d. :shame : the qua. lily of a large portion was inferior. The loot of a Laren quantity to the Tigi is front L'eylon last week off Dover will aoenad for the ad. caner un cwrent qualities -Metal!: Iron flint. No. I, Smith pig, 21. so.; rai's(ln Wales), U. les. to 51. 15a.; Lam ss. to 5/.101; spelter, In/ KM. Ten in fair demand, at Envious rater: tin plates in Large demand, as an advance in prim is anticir, steady : er'erl, pale, V/. ; straw, 251. les.; brown and yellux, 241. le 251. ; sperm mid headwaiter, 81/. to 82!.; cod, 231. le, Sualli Bes, 251. to 271. 10s.; olive Gallipoli, 411. ; Sparunh awl Keil!, 411.1 s 421. Ins.; p itto, TA to 311. 10s.; cocoa nut, 25/. to 36/.; sad rape. pile, 311. ; linseed, 231. ss. to 271. les. . . LONDON WEEKLY DOW( RETURNS, J. 27. I limrtett. _DeliceroL Pr. Stock. 1 MIL SocAl,W r .ludia:Crwits i 1,413 2,4i'2 --- 3 - ;;I::7 - 1 33.ir Mauritius bags 13,17) 1 , ,4.14 1:.7.6 3 1 141,7 A Den-alb Matins. Les 16.243 13,t,71 101; 34 1 1%.3:4 F0n.4.01. — 4.4.1.1 ~V. 31 11,..X.. .. ; MO 3 1 136 Corns, ILP carks ta I 43 Rut . 7, o: 3.x3 Callon hags 34 4.1 1 1.1.,.• 3 114.361 Ocua, B P 343- 341 3, .•3 3.134 1 V 4....... = 677 Roy. .L — 446 B,st3 OM 1431 COTTON —LIVARPOOL, JAN. 29.—Thcre was a put deal of business done to.day. and :be sales were between 12,fr0 and 16,000 bales; ou.y about AO bald ware on epecul.dion. =iet wan VET, firm, but prices did not adVILOCe, parties being willing to tell at present profits. II 1 SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.--Misr. LW, D 1.18.41416 PU. LEL OPL'AIM. 4 Pu11in...... Pl Holland .... 00 lnien a. qouii. 0 iu.c. gag o watt-noel . 0 niftier, 01 ,o;toi,..Fub 2d L. t Fe.h.2l 2 thnastrailee. 03 France 0 u o' A Yobt 1 9ecru.liJc)... 00 Lhoon ..Fcb.6 0 i:.✓t.nu: - ~a Olin, .• . Y0b.24 1 l .... 0u Z 4 sl2. N stl.W .0 •1fn........Fcb Gitavierrim, Jut. 19.—Anired ; Diana. Veltlewalts ; David Luetie, Demerara; 11 rt., Ostend; C.untorof Li.nsdale, limoburg ; llebry lenity, lib Grande; Lark, Rouen; Lion, ; agnot, tenlans , Punch, Ceptishada; stettin • Tomb ht. 34khuers; Ur it I, Alemudria ; Venezuela, /mean rp ; (iaselle,ol.ono ; mi t anda. St. Miehaerr.—belled : Terra Nova, Routes ; John Line, Cat e, llar.eguln. *Jr haste, has put back with some detects. Lirtaroob, Jam. 29.—Arrived • Nitllol4ll addle, Nubile; Latex% B. Ibilstord, l'ideatia; Empire Queen, 31obile; Waterloo, :.ew York; hanger, brads • Delmont, G. Fletcher, New Orlesn.; Caps lireton.—Off : Victoria, Harmer.—N•meds, Antra p, ..t Bahia; Maryland, for New Orleans. has put balk. [Advertisement.]-TIIE EALL OF A 1.1:0110110I:Gli AND ItounwAY's Piu.s.--An astounding cure by this m recisions medicine, after every other Paeans had fail d. See Cittala tram Ids Iced"hip's letter, dated "Villa httssinu, Leghorn, Feb. Cl, Itlis, no. tenor Illolloway.—Sir,--1 beg to acquaint you that tour Mils ham effected a core of a di order in my liver and stomach which all the m nd eminent of the faculty, at home and MI over •he Condiune, had not been able to effect; nay, cot t ven the waters of Carlsbad or Pia• rienbed.—(Signed)—Aunsoaorosi.".—Them word. rful will ears any disease of the liver or atomach.—Sold (also itolloway'. thutinent) at Erofessor Ilollnway's establishment, Ai, dtrand, and by all mon. doe vendors throughout the civilised world. 111 RTli& lIaILLIE.—Jan. 23. at LissLogton ile3telge• the WIZ% of the nee. J. Bank.), of a daughter. 41114 SlL—Jan. 24, at Amptblll square, llamportod roe I, the cite o( T. J. Bolter, Esq., of a daughter. BUTLER.—Jan, 2d, Mrs. C. huller, of St. John's, IforwelfJoern. of a daughter. ESsON.—Jan. 25, at Edinburgh. Mrs. of a son. HOOPEIL—Jan. 24. at Lotter, the vita of IL W. Burma, of a daughter. M J BLit; B.—Jan. 2d, at Stanley Lodr, ortlake, Surrey, the wife of A. A. Julius, Esq., of a Non. MOO )).—Jan. in, at Mahn, the wife of M. Mogg, Esq., of a doughter. ItSA 0 —Jan. 2.1, the wife of J. Y. II head. Lao., a am. TOOKE.—Jsa. nt her. Sucks, Om Wild t he &T. T. H. Toots, prematurely, of a son, still born. TUCK E44-Jsn. 22, at Shindlo near Bingsbeldge, Mrs. J of a daughter. WARNE w.—Jan. 26, at Meadow Oral, Syderniam, the wife of E s dasa;lner, which survived only hail au hour. WS:UAL—Jan. =. at Luton, Livatifordabire, the she i A. P. Welch. of • son. the wife of H. White, EN.. Carron-whaL London. of a nom MARRIAGES. INGRAM—ARNOLD.—Jan. 26 at Brampton Brian, by the lies S. W. lugram. of Ribbesford. canon of Worcester. the Rev. A. 11. R. I ueraot, rector of Ilaralrotton, Worcoter.hire, to Sethi , 2.11 1 1. 910 daughter of the late Lk ut. Cel. O. Arnold, Bengal Savolrf. KEN WORTHY —LSAT HAM.—Jan.Michael's. Carlton. near Pontefract by th e Rev. G. Iticherdsou. the licv. J. hoo4ol,hy, rector of Ackworth, year Pontefract, to ilarric• Ellsabogh, rub chi& of 11. 0. Leathern, Eat. PEARCE—ROW S.—Jan- 26. at Plymouth, by the Ilm. , Rowe. M.A., vicar of Credlton. W. B. Pearce, Esq.. of &iodise onhe. to Mao Joao &bowl daughter of R. Rowe. Seq.. of Thorn. t hrestock. STU NET—PROCTOR.—Jan. 27, at St. Mary's, had' bo the Wirs J. L Robcr:s, M.A., T. 11. Street. Eoq , of ?Moot-lam:and N..r , h•ell Ilampsterwl. to Jane Elizabeth. eldest d-ught.z of the ger. G. f.ucter. 12.0.. newt a adley. T S . STA L L—ROW K LR.—Jan. 25, at Walton onabc-11111, by the Rea P. Sutton. Edward eldest son of D. Torino& Esq., of itlfsdals. Msrganst Sarah Buena, only daughter of the late R. Bucker. h-to pool. VA Li L' 2 ver --troasutP.—Jan. It at St. Nicholas), Gram Yantank.bl l the hey) 4 • 1.. Wore4P, rector of Stokc.Ay. tbo Rev. IL Vet,. )1 iriteLter of St. Pettis. Greet Yarmouth, to Jane. dated , / 01,11. Wondnp, Esq. DEATH& ARBUTIINOT.—Jan. V, at Manchester, Llent.-04m.flr T. Art/Wheat. R. 0.8., commanding the Northern and Midland Disolgt. BOUCHISY.—Jan. 22. at Mere own House, Stafford...bun. Henrietta widow of tho laic Sir J. Boughcy, Barth of Asti- I, A ' a the suite DAN lid.—Jan. Yd. at Vernon place, Pentsuvlllo, Ur. J Looks. seed Y 26 . at Qtteen.4rvet. CbOtpridti, W. 1,. Eyre L... ic , d ll ' JON Ea—Jan. Id, at Upper Susie: place. Old Kesseroad. wife of Mr. F. Jonas. of Londomwall, aged OS. PHILLIPS.—Jan. 26, at Garrickavilla, ilanipton, Yarlaube eldest daughter of & PLlihpa, Esq. PILICE.—Jam 24, et AbergawatLy. Sarah, turf daughter of W. Prix. Eel., aged ZS ItAl'k°""'—j°2' 24 . at Uannnannith, SYsinna, %lea MO the Richert Radford, Eq.. In the noth year of her age. BOW LAN D.—Jan. IT, at Clapham Now l'..rk, Alcsarder rre . le_ • tjt i oldest an of Alesandar wfWam Rowland, keg.. aged 3 V " 4rs montha _ - lfuled arul t elibukl by WILLILIO luso HAI" Of N o Arcot, lu o London. Printer, at the (Ma. 01 601111 , 11 4.stroe. la UN gulag Walisaliaa—Tossaai. Jut Sax %