The Express. — London, England, 1849-12-04 00:00:00

RAILWAYS. Tai EAST INDIA FENINGCLAN RAILWAY C • • This company has, we undentand, chalet!, from amidst a host el Ca &dates, three (engineers, who wail most probably go cut to II Asib itt by the stet mad, f r the ;worms od pro media; at once wi Ono works. The per.tlemen selected are Mr. lino Berkley, formerly • pipit of Mr. Robert Stetressoa, end subsequently a nub -entriater on the North Eltaffochtsise line; Kr. Charles Km, resident *seinen under Mr. Locke, ea the Aberdeen line ; and Mr. OrAltam, a nephew of Bir JAWS Graham, also a pupil of Mr. Sonn ies's. We us lammed the bard have had mnehdifficulty, and same diffetenee of opinion, in milking this selection ler rezoszassnlatioa to the Esst India edmpoity, who, it appears, ban a tat upon the subjtct. This* appointments are astne4lly considered subjects et deep arsiety to the pro prietors, because of the dilleulti s of the climate, end the eharacter of the labourers to be employed, The work will be one of no ordinary Wel and inenorienee. and three who ate inter. st-d in the prosperity of India trust that this, the firit tsperiment el a railway there, wit be as eueeemfolly cooducted as the gnat minimises:a of the ecstasy and the nature of the 'Monate% demand. fIINDCII RAILWAY TRATIFIC.—The foIIOINN GTO the last ntems t gross weipt4 cif the prise* Frene b railways: Neavtasa.—Froes74m. t 9 to Nov. 23: r amengere,l3o,646:.; goods, 234,111.11.; total, 1111,111 IL itawne.—i r rom Nov. to to Nov. 24: Pasaresm. 33 . 335 f.; 1 03 4 911,1941.; totoomkozol. 11Alra&—NNINI Nev. IS to Nov. 24: Taineocers, deeds, • 4931.; de. datum. —From Not. 19 to N0v.13: ffairenent. 70,0:4t.; goods. 111,6161.; total. 1111,6141. loaesstA.—Yrum Nov. is t 4 Noe. : 31,1044; VW* 41.,96W.; caul. 76,663 f. V111100)1.-- tmea Nov. 19to N0v.12: TworININS gouda 4200a u t ei tot.d, 60,739 f. ss.—lsim Nov. 13 to Nev. 23 : rameasers, 23,4994; goods, 10,294 L; total, 36,7631. Uwea.—rvoss Nov. 12 to Nov. 24 : raseettrms, 3,309 f. ; pods 11,111 f. ; total, 11.45: 1 1. Keurisc—atom Nov. It to Nov. 33: rs*.fcrigas, 16,127 f. ; goods, 14.7311 ; Intel, 21,134 f. Mamerso.—Freal Nov. 13 to N0v.26: norm vs, 41,163 E; goods, 24,1117 f.; total. 70,6304 SPORTING. TATTERSALLI3—MONDAT. LEAMINGTON STEEPLE CHASE. 6 to I a4st British Yeoman (t) 6 to 1 10 to 1 The Plume (t) • 10 us 1 l asuutler 19 to l i'der elm* 100 to 7 Agitation 0) 100 to 6 Utile Yana it) 15 to 1 Lath l3eeiaicn (t; 15 to I Abelelkider Very little dams es this event, and (sly the two favorites In any brie. LEAMINGTON HURDLE RACE. 5 to I apt Miss Burns 0 to I most Mts. James ta l— Van Zeta 1 7to — Syrup CHEWIER CUP. !moo to 20 sod Bir R. liteketere Melody (t and ait e 0) 1,000 to 1 Mr. 2.40.1.0rea John Owner 2,00 to 2 Mr. PAM'S IMO , tloy (t) 2,0.0 to 2 Mr. Gregory"" lumask (t) 1,000 to 1 Mr. w. Coaway's Kennington (t) 1,0(0 to I Mr. Comers (1) 1,000 to 1 Duke ol !Liebmann . * lino (I) 1,000 to 1 -- Mr. Marpby's Dough (t) 1,001 to 1 Mr. J. , f....tt's klulguire (t) 2,000 to 40 Captun Ha worth's The )tatoucm (t) 2,000 to 2 Mr. No: .r., Blucher (t) DERBY. 9to Mr. W. Hoards nd Bollneterhe to —D. of 18, hmond'e Ghillie Callum (12 to 1t to 501.) 12 to tor! Edturon's Knight of It 125 to 1) 15 to Mr. Ali I[ . .am••• The Dalian k t to :0!.) 22 to Mr. J. r:zott's Cyprus (t) 23 to Mr. ITlll,y'. S.eetheort. 13 to Mr. tiratwildises The Nigger (t) 26 to Duke ,4 &Molar/1.14Ln o'Gruut 23 to Lard W.Lennoes William the Conqueror (t to 500 1,000 to 40 Mr. Jsques's MBAs, (t) 30 Lard Aute's Mother (t to VV. and aft an) 31 to Lead Airik's Debate (t to 13C!.) 40 Mr. H. Min litafavd (t to De.) 4010 Mr. Bowes's litatber to Egdro:e (t to 3314 43 to Lad Eallatail Mayors (t) 1,003 to 1 Lard Fiilmentm's Yew Tree (:) 1, Oa to 2 Bolingbroke manias the Derby, and Bee Hunter the et. Leger (t) 5110 even on the field opt the following lot :—Holirg broke, Onidllit Collin°. Knight of Avenel. Italian, Cyprus, Sweetheart, Mildew, Voltigenr, and the Nipper. In most of the above quotations we haire indicated the moults to which the odd. w, re taken; we should mention, however, that 1,000 to 40 and 45 was hid to uearlv 2001. mist Cypnw, 3,300 to 100 ass; brother to Ep:rote, sad 1,000 to 30 two or thres times, and 1,000 to 15 eget Mayors, the last bet laid opt the :attar ming 46 to 1 In ponies. lain intelligenm SCUJITY COURTB.—YESTERDAY. DEPORE THE VICS.CRASCILLOR or tact %.n. ATTORNIIT-GINSRAL O. BROWN'S HCIvPITAL, BUY FORD. —111111•01HENT OP A CHAIUTT.—INFORMATION.— Vlarrolt•L POWERS OF PHI BISHOP OF LIKCout. Tail was an iotormation filed by the Attorney.Oeuenl, at the relation of certain inhabitants of Stamford, foe the pur pose of !navies a new uheme, directed by the court, for the administration of the tends of a charity conic' Brown's Hos. pita), at Stamford. The information stated that letters patent were granted by Richard 111., in the 2nd year of his reign, to William Brown, of Stamford, entitling hi. to found and establish a perpetual almshouse in that town; that the .aid William Brows died in 1438, without having competed the establishment of sock almshouse ; and that letters patent were afterwards granted by King Henry V., in the 9th year of his reign, to l'homas Stokke, the executor of William Brown, giving him the sate power for founding the almshouse as bad been granted to William Brown ; that the EIfRiII3WHIP was thereupon founded, and various statutes or ordinances were framed for the management thereof, by which it was directed that the charity should consist of one warden, one contrater, and 12 bedetf.ilks of both kinds, to wit, 10 men and 2 women, who were to be under the rule arid government of such warden and coafrater, and power sru given of titling up vacanzici, first, to the Dean of Stamford and the Vara of All- h allows, then to the heirs of William Brown, then to the aldermen of Stamford and the Abbot of Crowland, and then to the Bishop of Lincoln. Directions were On given for the performance of divine service at stand times, end for other purposes regarding the management of the chuity. The information then stated that, in emosequesee of certain irregularities having taken plate in the administration of the funds. Ccf. Ws bitters patent were granted by King James the First, is the 6th year of his reign, he the better and mere effecUW management of the eturity; and it wee, amongst other things, directed that t it s Bishop of Lincoln, foe the time being, with the oraistenee and consent of the Archbishop of Canterbury, foe the time beige, should, from time to time, revise, examine, and inquire into the ancient laws and constitution: , of the' said almshouse, and should abolish and obliterate oath of them as were repos sant to the laws and statutes of the kingdcm, and should make and constitute such good, fit, and salutary laws sad ordinances as well concerning the divine service daily to be celebrated in the hospital as concerning the government and direction of the warden, confuter, and poor to be sup ported therein, as saould appear to them good, useful, and salutary, and to revoke, change, determine, alter, or make anew, as to the said bishop should from time to time appear mere expedient, say of them so made, or to be made. snow, , ateardieg to the real meaning of such 1-teen patimt. The information further stated that a revision of the statutes of the hospital was made in 1674 by the then Bii.hop of Lin coln ; and again in 1709, by the then Bishop of Lincoln ; and subsequeutty in 1763, by the then Bishop of Lincoln; and lastly in 1 8 28, by the then Bishop of Lincoln. That since the establishment of the said hospital the postern= thereof had been largely augmented, and the average annual income amousied to between 1,21101. and 1,3001.; that consequently the income was much more than sufficient for the maintenance of the charity ceeerding to the original foundation thereof. That the surplus of suck revenues ought to be applied under the direction of the court in aug mentation of the benefits of the charity, and it prayed that the said charity might be regulated by the court, and that the powers and authorities vested in the Bishop of Lincoln for the time being under the letters patent of King James asigist.be ascertained and defined, and that tho duties of the warden sad confrater in reference to the performance of di vine service might be declared, and proper directions given for that purpose; the: the rights and Interests of the vicar of ' All Saints is re f erence to the matters claimed by him might also be declared ; and that a scheme might be settled for the future government of the charity, and for the distribution and apption of the revenues thereof ; end that itsaight be asc e rtained in whom the general power' of the Tifton of the eharity were now vested, and whether it would bo row is cacti sue the office of confrater after the death of the pow son now bolding that office. The minutes foils relhome the ![aster were agreed upon between the parties Win pow pose of carrying out the objects of the information with exception et that part relating to the visitorial pow of the Bishop of Lincoln, and it was submitted en behalf of No N. nests that the authority given by the letters patent no BM Bleep of Lincoln to make and constitute statutes either oes• woke, the divine services in the hospital or concerting the lm o mg direction of the warden. enfrater sod peso oC e re llat stimodee the said bishop to make statutes eon c els iltribeolea of the revenues of the said hospital, or e la3 sigeti, did not authorise the said bishop is direct any distri bution of such revenues. The arguments in the eau were esincluded on the 9th of November, when judgment was reserved. The Viso-Chancellor now lelieeratiudgatent, and rid*, question wee whetter under the chant* of King James 1., the Bishop of Lincoln was the general visitor of the charity. It &wand that serious sets had been done with reference to the charity, is which it was *ruined thst the bishop had • tight to exercise the inners' visitorial p 'wets, but apish seal ing over the charter, his opinion was that such was not the case, and that the bishop had only a limited power, not rx tendmg tone management of the revenues of the charity. This eau resseabled the authority of the Berkhampstead Free Sehool ( 2 Veg. and Bra.), whith bad been quoted, and his decision would be that the Bishop of Lincoln bed no ge. mend power over the revenues, hut that they were, under the circumstances which had oeseured, subject to the jurisdiction of this court. Dans V! Higtotrt Bum. Faant usa o. Baattt—Thi Wz tow BANK BAt.o. Vila woo a demurrer to a hill of iatreplmier filed by Merin Farebtotber and Co., tase auctioneers, by whom the propertl at Willow= oak, beleaglag to Mr. Deladeld, the Mete. eQ tie Italian Open, is Covont-ordes, had been sold. Aceordlas to due ettteseate of the bit', the defondamt, Mo. Book, was mortgagee of the property, with power of eels. Mr. Walks.", another defendant, also claimed the benefit of • seeseity on the goods and ehnt.la at Willow b•mk fur 2.0001. Under them securities Mr. Beale, with the '. assent sad coccuirence " of Mr. Walker, instruct. • as plaintiffs *a sell the property, which they accordingly did on the 2nd of July last and following dap. On July 13 the plaintiffs were served Ph notice from the solicitors prosecuting the penceediap in bankruptcy against Mr. Delatiald, not to part with any of the money arising from the gale ; and afterwards they netted a-..other notice on behalf of Mr. Delafield'a meioses to the same effect. The sale realised 10,1825. 71. 6d., banag, after various payments, a baler es of 8,2321. Bs. 7d. is 'be plaiatiffe hands, foe which amount Mr. Beale had brought an action against the plaintiff', who were also threatened with legal proceeding an the eft ef Mr. Welker if they parted with the luta. The geetwess also persevered in their claim, and threatened to neat= it. The plaintiffs offered to bring the money into newt and sought the usual relief in an interpleader suit, to dish the above claimants were made defendants. Me. ineetal and Mr. C. Barber, for Mr. Beale, in support of the de cue's', contended that the plaintiffs were Mr. Reales 'gents, and were only accountable to him ; and that they could not sustain • bill of internleader against him con tinently with the law, as established by " Crawshay v. Thornton" (2 Mylae and Craig, 1, and earlier authorities). Mr. Bwanston and Mr. If ielop Clarke, for the plaintiffs, contended that Mr. Walker had directed the sale, jointly with Mr. Beale, while the assignees claimed under Mr. Delafield, and not by any title poramount to that of Mr. Beale. The plaintiffs were therefore not contesting Mr. Beale 's title, but were entitled to the protection of the court consistently with the authorities referred to. as appeared from " Nicholson v. Knowles" (5 Maddock, Wood" (Craig and Phillip, 185), " Primo v. Carin" (2 Russell and if fate, 606), and other casts. lir. Russell replied. The Vice-Chancellor said that, accordieg to his present view of the reeord, a case of interpleadsr was made uut as between Mr. Basle and Mr. Walker. That would leave the questions open, whether • case erf interpleader was stated as between ldr. Beale snd the assignees of Mr. Delafield, and if not what was the effect of that upon Mr. Beale's rights ? His Honour's present impression was, that if &camel interpleader was not stated as aiain-t the assignees, the bill would not on that account be maltifariona His flonoer'a impression else was, that whether • case of in terpleader was or was not sustainable as against the mignon, Mr. Beale was not entitled to demur. Unless his Honour intimated • different opinion on Thursday neat, such must be considered his decision. It was agreed that in the meantime no proceedings should be taken. Haman VwsZwANCTSLOIWIciAAN. RIGBY V. USIAT WE/SLAM RAILWAY COYPANT. His Honour delivered his judgment upon this motion, which was argued last term by Mr. Wood and Mr. J. Bailey, on behalf of the plaintiff, and the Solicitor-General and Mr. Stevens, on behalf of the company. The plaintiff held the Swindon refreshment rooms under a lease from the company, by which it was stipulated that the cmipany should give every facility to tae plaintiff, to enable him to obtain en adequate return, by means of the rents and profits to be derived from the rooms; and that all trains carrying pee -1 singers, not being express treble, should stop there for refreshment of passengers for a resalable period of abLut ten minutes. The plaintiff afterwards granted an under-lease of the premises to the defendant Griffiths and covenanted with him that during the continuance of the term thereby granted he would do eh such acts and things as shourd be necessary for enforcing the fulfilment of the cove nants and agreements by which the company were bound in the *Finial lease. Early in 1844 the company commenced Inane certain trans to Exeter, which Griffiths conceived not to be express trains within the exception of the covenant, without stopping at Swindon station. Gritfi.hs thereupon wrote to the plaintiff, informing him that he was losing 6f. or fit. a day by tense trains not stopping at the station, and that if the practice continued it would not be worth while carry ing on the rooms. Griffiths, however, on being applied to, Musa to take proceedings against the company, whereupon the present suit was instituted by the plaintiff against the company, and Griffiths, to restrain the former from running any trains, other than such as were within the exception in the covenant, without stopping at the Swindon station. In 1844 emotion for an injunction was made before his Honour, who, before granting it, required the plaintiff to establish his right at law, the company undertaking to keep an amount of passengers passing in the trains complained of. Proceedings were aoordingly taken by the parties at law, by I which every question both of law and fact was tried, which 1 the parties had thought fit to try. The plaintiff was altoge ther successful in these proceedings, and thereupon renewed his application to the court fer the injunction. Upon the heerbig of that application the company &eked that • ease might be directed to a court of law for in 'pinion upon a question of law, which, it was said, they had isadvuteatly omitted to submit to the judgment of the Gan of Law on the former occasion ; and they resisted the Want:time being granted in the meantime. Hie Honour granted the injunction on the ground that the com pany had been dilatory in raising the question, which otherwise he should have decided in their favour. His Honour's order for the interim injunction was reversed on appeal to the Lord Chancellor, who in lien thereof required an undertaking on the part of the com pany, besides keeping the accounts they had undertaken to keep in the (lest instance, to pay to the plaintiff what (if any thing) the court should find to be due to the plaintiff in re spect of the injury he might sustain by the company conti nuing to inn their trains in the manner objected to by the plaintiff. A cess was aeconingly taken to a Court of Law, the opinion of which was given in favour of plaintiff. Pend ing the proceedings at law the lease of the plaintiff expired, the iejunetion being thereby rendered unnecessary. The pringet mina was then made by the plaintiff to obtain the Mead= d*s seat as to the costa of the proceedings at law, and a rifeness to the Master to take the accounts, to which the engem had submitted. His Hewer, ie delivering judgment, observed that by the result of the passedicgs at law he thought the plaintiff had established his ease at law ; as well as his right to an injunc tion, in ON all Wrier of that kind had been required for the preteens of Ms rights. This, however, had been rendered unnesseely by the expsration of the plaintiff's hue. The poistate be decided were, therefore, reduced to three. Pint, the eine a the suit in equity ; secondly, the c sts of the pro media, at law ; and thirdly, the account. With reference to the points to which the mo'don was address , d, he would int teet of the question of account. It had beam onneta that the &count mast be matter of decree, and that the plaintiff could not obtain the reference upon motion be fore degree. He thought, however, that the court had a diseretire, either to direct such a reference upon mode. be give decree, or to postpone it to the bearing at the eau*, es the ends of justice might require. Did, then, the remaining question, as to the costs, alter the ease ? Wherever the court required the aid of an issue, or aa action in the nature of an lone, it exercised a discretion as to the disposal of the costs Mime the hearing, " Dimes el. Varty" (2 Phill., 699). In the present case it was possible that the result of a reference upon the matter of account might affect the question of costa ; and he thought, therefore, that the motion respecting the costs had better stand over until after the report of the Master upon the reference should have been made. The order, therefor*, would be for a reference to the muter to inquire whether any and what losses had bees sustained by the de fendant Griffiths in respect of the running of the trains from day to day without stopping at the Swindon notion for the purposes of refreshment. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—YzsTERDAT, SITTIMII AT WM PIIIIM—BOOII Mn. 11:1111C1 WioangAS. LLOYD O. HOWARD.—BILL OP EXCHANOIII. Mr. Serjeant She. and Mr. Hawkins appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. D. D. Keane for too defendant. It was an action against the acceptor or a Kill of exchange for 3001., drawn by one Chichester, endorsed by him to one Milton, and by Milton to the plaintiff. The pleas denied the accept. met endorsement, and also alleged that the bill was ob tahad by fraud. Mr. Serpent Shee, in opening the case, simply stated the fees as they appeared on the pleadings, and called John Colwell, who avid—l am an officer of the Queen's ratn. I know the defendant; the acceptance is in his i o seriting. I know a gentleman of the name of G. W. Howard, who is in the Queen's prison. I believe this to be his handwriting. J. Ruisell—l am acquainted with the handwriting of Mr. Chit:hater. Mr. Keane objected that this evidence was not receiv able, but that Chichester should be called. This was not the best evidence, but was only a comparison of hand writicg. Mr. Jude' Wightmem ressived the mititsce, subject to the objection. The 1,1011•41 then prasseded—The endorsement is the same handwriting as that elks drawer. The next endorsement is the handwriting of lir. Milton. Mr. Heave—l take the same objection here. Cromexamiaed—l em an attorney. lam on the roll. I reside at .26 Cranhommeetrest, Leicestersquare. I know the pldatiff. I believe he is a bill discounter. I was amid to mesa hers b tM sea if the plaintiff, in consequence of my b Mr. s writing. I know Milton. lie Os a Wm. lielibbs else, to my knowledge. He had • liwep.yezd is Qmseelemeet, Windmill-street. I knew him when was in the Queen's Prison. I know he applied to the Issaleant Oaart this year. I was not his attorney on that essmies. (It wee hire a k what was said by the cora missisaar whe n ffin.esg on Milton's case. This was, beeriest, eleasted to, sad not received ) lam his ethnic) now. Re lives at Hammersmith.—This was the ease fat the *OWL Mr. Kam eaMmeW that there was no evidence of the identity of Ohisleitsr sad Milton, end that skies mews's, to go to the 'try. No doubt his lordship's riling weak' be against him, as it would be supported by isms whisk ke would he eIOISIIIi to gaieties hereafter. mai Ye sisal& tends: a baler sampans la saw to raise VW imam Mr. Judie Wight's= thought the Waft was weal. Mr. Keene then addressed the July fert rs dellandankas urged that it was remarkable that the esussi ti dee OM UK had not stated who the parties to tbie Innletallen wen% but that he would now produce evidenee *Mit would show the whole history of the affair. He cesaanded that there had been no coaeideration given to the defendant for the hill and that there was no authority given to Milton to endennt it to the plaintiff, and: that there was no transfer from the original endures. to Milton, who bad given the kfil to Wi t= for • special purpose, which had not been fulfilled, and which the plaintiff knew. The following witnesses were then called: Mr. George Augustus Hamilton Chichester—l have been la the army. I know the defendant. He is a nephew of the Earl of Wicklow. I have always heard he is heir to 20,0001. a year. I have seen this bill before. I first saw it when it was accepted on the tad of May, 1848. The do. fondant was then at the Cavendish Hotel. He asked in if I wanted any mosey. I said I should like mos, if I could THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, DECEMBER 4, 1849. get it. He said, "De you think we could do a bit of staff ?":I said I will try, and I will pet my name to a bill. I drew the bill, and he accepted it. Us wanted some of the money to settle some of his again, and sons* turf transactions. tie wished me to get it disoounted. I went to e oust par tial and they would not touch it. I knew MI on. I Men tioned to him that I wanted some money. He said he could get money to any amount. I gave him the bill to get it diesounted, and when ha got the money to bring it to me and I would pay him for doing so. He took the bill with him. He never brought me any money, although I asked him re. y either to give the bill back or give me the money. re a r l i t in his possession after it suedes. It was torn to pieces sod dirty. Croseexamined—l don't know that I bays great esmosi dons. lam • memoir of the Marquis of Donegal's family. I have no property, only what my father allows me. When the bill was accepted I was in need of money. I had soy bill transaction with Mr. Howard before. I understood the term " bit of stuff." It is a cant term among gentlemen about town. I know Milton is a horsedeakr, and that he stole this bill from me. I have had similar transactions with him. I got the bills back, but I nevi r got any money from him. The time I lass saw the bill was atter the 2nd August. I saw it at the bar of the White Bear. I asked for it then. He took it out and held it out before me, sad showed as my writing and Mr. Howard's. I know Mr. Howard was in NVoroester Gaol. I told Milton that, and he said "Now I'll see about getting that bill paid." This was some months ago. I only beard be was in the Queen's Prison the day a:efore yesterday. I have been in the Queen's Prison, and knew Howard there. He gave me the bill for the purpose of being discounted. I was anxious to get it discounted. Milton said he would get the money for me. He said he could get it from a man in Chancery-lane. Every time I saw him he made an excuse about the money. On one occadoss be told me be had pawned the bill for 101., and asked mew give hiss that 1111111 to get it back. Henry Theodore James—l have been an attorney's clerk. I know the plaintiff. I have known him 20 years. He was a stationer in Fure-street, Cripplegate, when I first knew him. He was there some time. lie left Fore-street about 15 years ago, in consequence of having had money left to his wife, and he gave up business. He went into Wales. I did not see him in London for some years. When I next saw him he had again married a lady of property, and was living at Earl's terrace, Brompton, end curled on the business of discounting bills at 33, Bucklenbury. He also sold wine and watches to persons he discounted for, paying them part in watches and part in money. I know Willies Carter Gatos. He is an attori ey. About July last year Lloyd asked me to recommend him an attorney in whose name he could bring actions. Ho said he had a large law businass, end he wished for some attorney to wham he could pay • weekl stipend for the use of has name,aed if I got some one I s hould have • part of the busi ness. I was introluced to Mr. W. Carter Gates, and an ar rangement was made that Gates was to have 11. per week for the use of his name, and 121. to pay for his certificate— that arrangement continued from July 1848 to May 1849. Some things were done in law proceedings ; some in this court. I have seen this bill before; I saw it in Sept. last year, in Mr. Lloyd's band. He said he had advanced 50 1 . to Milton on this bill and two others, of the amount of 5001. and 1501. respectively. He said Milton had lei , them with him to be discounted, and he also left an I 0 U for the 501. ad vanced. I did not see any maul pass for the 1 0 U. He told me to take cue of the 1 0 U and the bills. I issued a writ on this bill in the Common Pleas. The attorney was either Mr. Gates or Mr. Turner— a person he had entered into an arrangement with after Gates left. Cron-examined—l was a year with Lloyd. I was his confidential clerk. He trusted me with all his transactions. I had no difference with him, except that he did not pay me. I have got a judgment against hint for 151. odd for salary. I had a discussion with him, and threatened to do hint all the mischief I could by disclosing his transactions if he did not pay me. I have no unfriendly feeling to him except to get my owe. I have not changed my mind as to doing him all the mischief I could. I acted as his clerk during his ne forking doings to get my living. I knew they were Delirious, but I stayed till I could get something better. Mr. Jenkins was called to produce the schedule of Milton in the Insolvent Court. It was objected that it could not be received, and rejected. This was the defendant's Mee. John Parry was called by Mr. Serjeant Slue in reply—l ma clerk to Mr. Lloyd . Hs is a man of property. Pert of his money Is the property of his wife. He is in the habit of lending money. Frequently takes bills from gentlemen with expectations. I remember his having this bill in the latter end of June last year. It we. in my drawer when it became due in August. It u nwise& there till April this year, when I gave it out to get a writ leaned. I presented it when due at a banking-house, la St. Paul's Churchyard, Messrs. Paged, Bainbridge, and Co. The answer was there wee no account there in the same of that gentleman. The banker's clerk at my request wrote the words "No account " on the bill. Milton owed , a large sum to Mr . Lloyd. He left this bill with others. I Croseezamined.—Milton had 120/ and 401. in June, and 601. on 6th July. I saw money on 6th July lying on the table. I beard Milton say, " That will do for the present." This took plea in the private office. I saw what passed casually. Be-examined—The handwriting of the document shown to me is Milton's hand. A receipt ior 1201. on account of three bills was tendered and objected to as requiring a stamp. It was received suhjict to the objection. Mr. Keane replied on the additional evidence, contending that Milton should have beencalled to prove this transaction. and not Parry. The receipt might have referred to any other bills. Mr. Serjeant Shoe replied on the whole case. After the learned judge had carefully summed up the Me, The jury d a verdict for the defendant, their find ing being that the plaintiff gave no value for the bill, and took it atter it became due. The verdict was entered on the issues that Chiche4ter en dorsed in violation of the special purpose, and that Milton did not endorse for value. COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—YarreRDAY. thu Palm—Biro= Si. V. PoLuxu, C.D., .me Wuriwurria BrEcut. Alms. BLARE (EXECUTOR) V. BROVOTITON.—ACTION 01.014 • BOND.—ALLEQZD FRAUD. The Attorney.O. nerd and Mr. Bramwell were clan. for the plaintiff ; Sr F. Theaiger, Q C., and Mr. Word, worth represented the defend-et. This cue was part heard on Saturday. It was an action on a bond conditioned for the payment of 1,4611. The de claration stated that the bond was executed by the defendant in May, 1845, and the plea alleged that it was obtained by fraud and covin, upon which issue was joined. The execu tion of the bond having been admitted, the defendant's counsel opered the case, as the onus of proving the affirmative of the issue was upon him. It ap peared the late Mr. Thomas Delves Broughton, who was son of the late Air Thomas Broughton, grandfather of the defendant, porsessed an annuity of 2001. Having b: en desirous to mike a provision for a lady with whom he had cihabited, he was anxious to sell his lite interest. Ho era pined his nephew, Mr. Edward Delves Brouckton, a soli. eitor, to communicate upon the !subject with Mr. Henry Delves Broughton, the defendant, who was to have been re sponsible for the payment of the annuity on the death of his father. For the purpose of fixing the price of the annuity, Mr. Edmunds, the actuary of the Legal and General Life Insurance Company, was consulted, and the only facts stated to him was the age of the annuitant. 68, and the amount of the annuity. Mr.Edmunds estimated its value at seven years' purchase. Aft.r some consultation, the de:endant agreed to become the purchaser, end the bond in question was given, for 1,4611.. which included half a year's annuity and interest on the principal for half a year. The testator died early in 1840, and the defendant'. father, Sir John Delves Brough ton (six months after whose death the bend was payable). died in August, 180. It was now stated that the defendant was quite ccntented to abide by the arrange ment he bad e- , tered into, and paid the interest of the bond Tap to May, 1848. But n having seen the testator, although he was his uncle, he bad reason to believe he bed been uncandidly dealt with in the traumatic'. He dis covered that his uncle had been in an alarming end danger ous state of health (or some considerable time previous to the sale of the annuity, and that several of the insurance offices in London had refused to insure his life; that before 1845, and up to the date of the bond, his life was in imminent danger from a disease of long sanding. Upon these around. the defendant resisted the payment of the bond. He alleged that the state of his uncle's health had been fraudulently concealed from him, and that be had been entrapped by misrepresentations into the purchase of the annuity, which at the time was perfectly worthless. He was willing to pay the bond at the time specified if the transaction had been bona fide, but. under those creamstances, he conceived he was absolved from all liability in respect of it. The assignment of the annuity reciting the bond having bus admitted, Mr. H. G. Robinson, a solicitor, proved the facts relating to the sale of the annuity as stated. The defendant said, at one of the meetings to negotiate the sale of the annuity, he had sever seen his uncle. When the preliminary arrange ment. were being made. it was said the late Mr. Broughton was 68 years of age. Nothing was said about his health. Yr. Edmunds's volution was the beide of the bond. Mr. Edmunds said he remembered having been called on to value the lowest of a gentleman of 68 years of age in annuity of 2001. He was of opinion that "sun years' pur chase wan very fair, assuming it to be a healthy life. Mr. Roots, a surgeon, at Kingston, in Surrey, deposed that ha had been la attendance on the testator from September, 1843, to January, 1845. From Assist, 1844, he bad visited him daily. He was affected by a dangerous disease of the bladder a 'el prostate plea. It be anie very dangerous in December, 1844, and cos dosed so up to January. 1845. At that time the nature of the disease was such that it was most probable it would terminate his 'tiptoes. in a few months. Some of the deceased's family knew the state in which he was. Mr. Anthony Stafford, of Old Burliestas-attest, sawn, said he had been in consultation widish' last whams ae to the testator's health. On the 20th of January, 1845, he was In great danger. He had Influential** of the bladder. In May, 1845, his life was not insurable. He might have had his Came five or ten yeah. The cause was then adjourned and resumed yesterday morning, when Mrs. Caroline Broughton was called—She said she had known the testator, and had resided with him for many yeah. He was affected by • painful disease up to the period of his death. He was desirous to fell his annuity of 2001., but he frequently said he could sot do so in consequence of the state of his health. Witness heard blowy that his wephsw, the defendant, had never seen him, and that Mr. Edward Dam Broughton had been negotiating with him foe a sale of the annuity. The testater said his brother, Sir Joke, fad refused to parches" it as he knew of his state of heel* but the defendant knew nothing of it. The deemed walked to see witness and hi. see at Orchard-street, Partmerwequare, some months before his death. He then took leave of his I child. He had previously eased to live with willies. Crowe:mined—l am no relation of the deceased, Mr. Broughton. I cannot swear I wee his wife, but I hod been presented before a magistrate in France as his wife, and I was informs] that ceremony was equivalent to a marriage. I have always considered myself as his wife. I have never seen the defendant. I expected to have hail tbis bond set tled upon me, but it was not. I live now at 6, Arundel street, Hajmarket, alone with my son. The complaint from which th af e al l , at h e is M a r. mi T uish . D. w ß as ro se uitt e o ti n m s e u s ife alm reel o w t as ir c r x e - presside.—The defendant's ease being closed, A Juror observed that it did cot appear the defendant had made say inquiry about the state of the sanuitant's health before the bond was executed. The Lord Chief Baron said there was no evidence on that point. One of the witnesses said that nothing whatever was said about the gentleman's state of health at the meeting which was attended by the defendant and Mr. E. D. Broughton, the testator's solicitor, preliminary to the emelt don of the bond. Another Juror asked whose ditty it was to make the is quiay ? The Lord Chief Baron replied that the rule caveat emptor applied to a party making a purchase who was bound to take cue that he was not imposed upon. But the law was, that if one party to a bargain knew facts which materially at. betted the value of the matter bergained for, and concealed these facts, such a concealment was evidence of fraud. Mr. Bramwell (in the absent* of the Attorney.deneral) thee address. d the jetty for the plaintiff. The case he aid, was of the utmost importance not only as regarded the amount of the band, but as it so deeply affected the charac ter of the &messed Mr. Broughton. The question was whether that gentleman had committed a fraud by conceal ing his state of health for the purpose of imposing on the defendant and entrapping him into the purchase of the an nuity. It was most extraordinary the defendant bed made no complaint during the time his uncle lived—not even when he died or afterwards for two years. until he was peened for a judgment and the interest, which he could not pay. The annuity was valued at 1,4611. in cash, and there was an important difference between suck a payment and the security of the defendant, who now refused to pay his bond on the ground that his uncle had been guilty of fraud. It was most incredible that the defendant did not well know the state of his uncle's health all through. Sir J. his Broughton knew it, and that was his reason for re• fusing to purchase the annuity. How was it possible itcould have been unkaown to the defendant ? Unless the family were the meet cur' ordinary in the world, no one could be lieve that the defendant alone knew nothing of a circum stance which must have been for years notor ous amongst them. If the testator's state of heath was not known gener ally amongst the family, why did not the defendant cal some of them to orove it? The reason was obvious. Because no member of the family could prove it. The late Mr. Broughton had not concealed his state of health fretn the insurance offices to which he applied to effect insurances on his life, was it to be believed that be had dishonestly or fraudulently concealed it from his own near relative ? It was most improbable and incredible that he should have fixed upon the defendant, who was most likely to have known all about him. It was a very serious charge against the late Mr. Broughton, and ought to be confirmed, not upon suspicion or surmise, but by positive evidence, before the J uly entertained it. The defendant had made a very good bargain. He purchased 2001. a year, and had undertaken to pay only 601. or 601., the interest of the bond, which he now repudiated altogether. The Lord Chief Baron recapitulated the facts, and laid down the law applicable to the case. There were various instances in which contracts bad been vitiated where there was a suppression of truth, even though no misrepreeentation had been made. For instance, where the vendor of a house, being conscious of a material defect in the main wall, plastered it over to conceal the de fect from the purchaser, who afterwards discovered it, it was held to be such a fraudulent concealment as entitled the purchaser to recover the purchase money back. If the jury believed this bond was executed in consequence of the &curd Mr. Broughton concealing the fact that he was at the time labouring under a mortal complaint, the bargain could not stand. The testator possessed that infor mation, and as it was not disclosed U. the defendant, the whole transaction was void. If the defendant did not know of thou facts when be executed the bond, his subse quent payment of interest or his reluctance to avoid the transaction would not deprive him of his right to set up the present defence. The question was not what the defendant had done since, but whether a fraud had been committed when the bond was executed. The jury should consider whether there was any suppression in May, 1846, upon the part of the testator or his soilictor, of any facts known to them and not known to the defendant, who ought to have been apprised of them before the bargain was completed. It was in evidence the defendant had never seen his uncle. If he had, why was not Mr. Edward Delves Broughton, the solicitor who ma naged the whole business, put into the box by the plaintiff ? He could have explained the whole transaction, but although he had actually appeared in court on Saturday to produce Mme papers the plaintiff had not called him. It certainly • . • As not for the defenhint to do so, because the gentlema, was a party to the transaction which was now impeached. It was the plaintirs duty to call the man who negotiated the whole matter, who was also a near relative of both the parties to it, and who could have said distinctly whether the defendant did know of his uncle's state of health in May, 1845. The jury should judge for themselves under all the circumstances. If they beliterd the anat gement was a fair bond lids one the plaintiff was entitled to recover ; but, if the testator's state of hea:th was so alarming and dan gerous that it ought to have been communicated to the defendant, and that it was not communicated to him, then their verdict ought - o be for the defendant. The jury, after deliberating for a few minutes, returned a verdict for the defendant. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. OLD COURT.—YESTERDAY. %roan Tea iticoaosa. CRAROI OF FORGERY AGAINST ♦ SOLICITOR. Hems, Sinathers surreadertd to receive Me judgment of the court. The defendant, who bad been an attorney at Aylesbury, was c.:.nvicted a few sessions asto of uttering a forged retainer in a Chancery suit, but a point of law was reserved which the judges have since decided against him, and he now ap peared to receive judgment. The defendant was about to enter into a statement with regard to the circumstances under which the conviction took p'ace, but The Recorder said he could not allow him to do so. He knew nothing of the case, sad all he had to do war to pass the sentence fixed by Mr. Justice Ede, the learned judge who triad him. _ The defendant said he bed submitted an affidavit to Mr. Justice Us upon the subject. The Recorder said that learned judge had seen his affidavit, and he said that it did not at all alter the view he had taken of the ease. He had now only to pus the ecntecce, which was that the defendant be imprisoned in the common gaol cd the county where the offence wee committed, for one year. The defendant was then removed in custody of the officers of the poi. NEW COURT.—YESTERDAL Boma Tim Commit ROBBERY AT CIIIII.IIZA. Thomas Macdonald, 33, labourer, Mary Macdonald, 32, niarri.d, and Mary Fos, 62, widow, were indicted for steal ing 701. and some other property belonging to Thomas blllowran. . - The prosecutor, a shabby looking Irishman, was a teacher of languages at Lyons, where he had lived for many years, and amused a considerable sum of money, but being ac , cued of having taken a part in some disturbances, he was arrested, thrown icto confinement, and all he possessed seized. Subsequently procuring his liberty, he made his way to England ' and from that period down to the time of the eorambeion of the offence lived at Chelsea, gaining a living by hawking matches and other trifling article. Whilst so living he memorialised Lord Palmerston, through whose interference he obtained restoration of some of the property he had been deprived of, and on the 24th of September received 741. and two watches, with which he was seen in possession at Chel sea, and in company with the prisoners; and on the evening of that day he was aeon in the streets in great distress, com plaining of having been robbed, and be then suddenly and most mysteriously disappeared. The facts coming to the ears of the police the prisoners were taken up, and on the woman was Sound a quantity of money, amounting to nearly 601., and on the man some new clothing, respecting which they gave very contradictory accounts. Handbills were then printed foe the missing man and rewards offered, and from time to time the prisoners remanded ; and nothing was heard of 11`Gowran until about a fortnight ago, when information was received that he was some distance from London, in the county of Kent, subsisting by begging, and when he came to London he was taken before the police magistrate and thus gave evidence, bringing home the robbery to the woman, who bad taken it from him when drunk, and he said that when he came to himself and found his money gone, hers& away, and only knew what had taken place from seeing an old newspaper is which be read the report of the emination. . . . The dormice set up by the woman Mary Macdonald was, that the prisoner had given her the 1114110 y, wishing her to go to France with him, and that he owed her a large guts for Wart sad lodging. Mr. BaDentine having intimated that he thought the cam weak against Thomas Mc Doesld and Mary Fox, The jury Acquitted them, and found Mary Macdonald Guilty. The Common &leant said, had it been a usual case of plundering a man by wholesale she would hove been trans. i ported, but as there were strange circumstances attending the affair he should order her to be imprisoned twelve months. TIM POLICE COURT& MANSION-HOUSE. EMIIIiZZLBSIENT BY • MIAC&NTILI CLIME. —S. M. Phillip was brought before the Lord Mayor, in the onstody of Michael Haydon, the officer, upon the charge of having embezzled several sums of money, the property of his em. crioyen Messrs. Allnett, of Mark-lane, wane and spirit merchants. It wee the prisoner's ditty to receive money and enter it in the books; end it was proved that he had given receipts for three several sums, without having entered them in the books, and appropriated the money to his own use. Upset the Het examination of the prisoner, a few days ago ' a man of very respectable appearance proposed to bail the prisoner, after having op .ken in the highest terms of his character ; The Lord Mayer, by the 'dice of Mr. (ioodmaa, the chief clerk, refused to take bail, very much to the chagrin of the applicant. Mr. Humphreys, for the prosecution, said he was sorry to be ebliged to call evidence to show that his lordebip t•d acted most judiciously in declining to accept sureties, as the prisoner had been previously convicted. Mrs. Emma Phillips, the wile of Mr. T. Phillips, en graver, stated that she knew th e prise nor, and that in the year 1848, at the Summer Assist's at Warwick, she h,,,1 attended as a witness for his prosecution, when he plesded guilty to a charge of embezzlement. The prisoner was committed for trial. WORSHIP-S VREET. Ourneoz trent • Simile's's OPPICEIL—Mr. Samuel [ Alabaster, a beershop keeper or is Tabernacle ! walk, Finsbury, w-s brought up on a warrant charged with the following outrageous attack upon Joseph Howlings, resistant to Stomata, the sheriff's otficer. The complainant, whose head was enveloped in bandages, stated that an execution having been levied upon the defendant's goods under a wilt of fieri facial on Tuesday last, he was belt in possession to take care of the furs.iture, and ever since he had been so he had been subjected to the most opprobrious treatment from the defendant nimselt, who had not on: constantly assailed him with the grossest abuse, but also violently assaulted him on different emersion', with the veld at object of inducing him from fear to relinquish poestaaion. He, however, maintained his position until 12 o'clock en Sat urday night, when the defendant, after closing the house, and directing a friend of Lis named Thackeray to bolt and chain up the uoors, in a state apparently of great excitement entered the bar parlour, where witness was seated, and accused him of !writ g scandalously insulted his daughter on the preceding afternoon. The ac cusetion was wholly without foundation ; and, having told him that he had not interfered with the young woman any further than was absolutely necessary to prevent the forcible removal of part of the goods, which was being' carried on ander her direction", and which thsy bad succeed-el in effecting notwithstanding, end carrying away from the premises, the defendant e :claimed that all the sheriffs' officer' might go to and that he was determined to take away whatever he thought proper, and would do so in spite of them. He then asked him whether he intended to be " civil" or the reverse, and on witness repi, ing that he could not allow the things to be taken away, the defea. dant called his friend Thackesay into the room, and ordered him at once to take down • full length portrait which was hanging over the mantel piece. Thackeray pro ceeded to do so, and was about to remove it from the room, when witness endeavoured to stop him. but was immediately attacked by the defendant, who seized him by the collar, and, forcing him back Into a corner, commenced beating him about the face and head till the blood streamed from • deep gash under one of his eyes and poured on to his clothes. He called out loudly for assistance, and begged for mercy, but the de fendant told him it was perfectly melees for him to attempt ressistaece, and at the same time renewed the attack, and forced him down upon a sofa, where he held him down by his hair for about 20 minutes, during which several artic:es were removed from the premises, including the picture before mentioned, which was taken out at the back and carried away. He then entreated the defendant to allow him to sit up, which he at length did, but placed himself in a chair in front of him, to prevent him from rising and op posing the removal of the property, and he was detained in the house till the following morning, when he succeeded in privately oespatching a message to the officer of the sheriff,Slo man, who sent down two other men to relieve him, and wit ness immediately made his way to the station-house, his face still bleeding, as it had continued to do all night, but he was there advised to apply at this court for redrew, and having bad his injuries dressed by a surgeon, he came here and obtained a warrant for the defendant's apprehension. Slomao, who was in attendance, said that the conduct the defendant had pursued throughout there proceedings had been characterised by such lawless violence and determina tion to set the law at defiance, that he felt himself compelled, for the protection of his servants in cases of a similar de scription, to press the case against him with as much severity as he could. ... _ _ _ _ liammill said that the charge was of far too serious a nature to admit of his dealing with it in a summary manner, and he should, therefore, direct the depostions to be taken, and send it for the consideration of a jury at the sessions. In the meantime he would accept substantial bail for the de fendant's Suture appearance to meet the charge, which be should fix at, the defendant himself in 501., and two sureties in 25!. each. The bad was shortly after procured, and the defendant thereupon released from custody. MARKETS. CORN.—Cinswenarea, Dec. 3.—A moderato demand for good samples of Wheat to-day; inferior almost unsaleatie. Barley, except far tine parcels, which are very scarce, is exceedovb dull, very little attention being paid to it. Beans, Peas, and Oats unaltered. Wheat, W. to 101. 10s. per load. Barley, 23a. to 30s, per qr. Oats, les. to 20a. Beans, 2Sa. to 38s. Pees, boilers, 4s. to U. 3d. per bath. HADLEIOII, Dee. 3.—Considering the unfavourable state of the weather, our attendance at market to.d.ry and the supply of corn were pretty iced, but the trade was very bad for %Shea, and wone for Barley, at Is. to 2s. per qr. abrtement rich on best prices. Beale and Peas, hard and handsome, nearly maintain their prices. STETNINO, Dec. 3.—A middling supply of Wheat, hut the little business done was at an abatement of 2a. per or. Farmer' generally were disinclined to sell at the prices offered. Barley found sale at a similar reduction. Beane. Yeas, and Oats unchanged. White Wheat, 101. 10s. to 111. ; red, 91. to 01. 10a. Barley, 2Gs. to 30s. Oats, 13e. to 17e. Beans, Va. to Ms. Pews, 295. to 30s. CATTLE, &C.—COLCHESTER, Dee. I.—lngatestor. e and Bury St. Edmund'. fairs being held to-day, there was a thin attendance of dealers at market, and a limited show of stock, but the supply was snore than equal to the demand, as the tr . ulc ruled exceedingly heavy throughout the day, and prices for &este and Sheep declined nearly per cent., and but very Sew sales at that reduction. Pigs continue a heavy sale, but w can quote ne prticular alteration in value from last week. Supply : Sheep and Lambs, 1,140; Besets, 01; rim 250 ; Calve., 16; Hones and Ponies, 42. Noiwitni, Dec. I.—Our =whit exhibited a large show of Beata and sisert.hana. Being Bury Gir-day, both cattle and cus tomers wire divided, sad, to street sales, lower prices were taken. For elate, is. 6d. to la ; sheet-horns, is. to IL 6d. ; Devon', and Irish, 2s. 6d. to Is. per stone of 141 b. when fat. At these prices fu,ly one fourth remained unsold. Fat Bawds wane, at Gs. Gd. to per stone . In Sheep, Lambs, and stock Imes, so number shown worth notice. Fat Sheep a ready sale, at Ts. pee ekes. Good store Pip, Its. to 20s. per head. Fat Pork, Ss. 3d. to So. dd. per stone. METEOROLOGICAL RETURNS, TUESDAY, DEC 4, 1849. The State of the Weather at each of the following places at Nina o'clock yesterday morning. —The stations are now arranged in order of latitude. Named Place. 00,1 " ° I B "t i r th of State of We►ther. Wind. Wind. Prniotrrn........ 9.E. Cahn Foggy Emma N.W. Calm Foggy PORTINOWN N.E. Gentle Breese Partially Cloudy Hammon N. Cahn Partially Cloudy ILwriscat Sorra/Jamas Tairaamen itumoeross N. Calm Fogey Barerot N.W. Breeze Overcast GREENWICH E. Gentle Breese Rain SWINDON 011/01D E. Alm Rain Guaccsarna . Ls:arrow CANZEIDGI Branneaux E. Gentle Breese Rain I•inessoiouon...... E. Strong Breeze Heavy Rain Housman E.B.E. Strong Breeze Overcoat Maramsrsa E. Hard Wind Rain talcum's N. Strong Breeze Overcast Daussorort E. Hard Wind Overcast Sear IiartISPOOL B.E. Storm Overcast SUNDIJILAXD E. Heavy Gale Partially Cloudy Normarts Burroon B.E. Strong Breese Partially Cloudy lAnalt Z. hard Wind Overcast Branum &amuse* Strong Breeze Overcast Smog recze Partially Cloudy THIS DAY, Noox. of Wind. State of Weather. m. Clear. on=e of Wind. N. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. (Item our Coureopeoleale, Ye "Shipping Oesette," sad "IJoyel's List` CASUALTIES. Brunswick, from Callao , for England, Tut back to this port, 16th inst., loaky.—Valptrsiso, Sept. 29. Employ—part of the cargo (dash) thrown overboard, ex Employ, Hoskins, from St. Petersburg, for London, which was on shore on Oaland, 11th lost., has been saved, and t e v . ii;;el -- hi - sa — ire'd sae her dealnaan -Cdsear; N0v.16. Infanta, Purday, for Mobile; Marlborough, Toyer, for Jamaica; Superb, Lemesurier, tor Havannah ; have put back.—Deal, Nov. 2. Irene, of Newcastle, from New York to Liverpool, was aban doned October 17, lat. 61, long. 17, in a sinking state, having been in contact with the Robert, from Liverpool to Boston ; crew saved, and landed at Boston per Robert. John Horton, Cunningham, was lost in Punta Arenas Har bour, 21st Sept. crew and materials saved. Jane, Clark, from Dantaic for London, which put in here leaky (as reported), has reshipped her cargo, and proceeded this morning's tide.—Bridlington, D, e. 1. Mary, Jenkins, of and bound to London, from Isefjord, struck on the NW. reef o ff Lame in the night of the 14th instant, bat was assisted off atter discharging part of her cargo, and arrived her* 18th.—Mantand, Nov. 20. Samuel, liaison, from St. Petersburg, was got off the Strand last evening, after dischargiag 145 casks of tallow and some lathwoed, and towed into the roads, making much water; this morning, in making for the harbour, struck, and now lies same the harbour, with very little appear ance of getting or—Yarmouth, Dec. 2. Titania, Smith, which sailed from Corfu, a few days pre vious to the 23rd of Nov., in search of freight, bound to Zante, Palms, or Smyrna, struck on the shoals near Paso, and was totally wreck , d ; crew sand. Tuscorara, Liverpool to Philadelphia, was wrecked near latter po rt Nov. 16; crew and passengers saved. William Stove!, Norris, tram London to Montserrat, has put in leaky, pumps choked, and has come into the pier.— Falmouth, Dec 1. AMILIVID. I NAILS, I DUE. Hamrg •• Henan bu d Lisboa... Pacific India vid filqutleampton India vid Marseilles Boston and Halifax Mexico and Havannah West India Brasil ARRIVED. AMA- ret Bristol, December 3, horn. ..... _ Aweless Tams-at Queenstown, November . SO; . froM ''''''''''''''' Asuitens spa -at Falmouth, November 31, from.. '''''''''' „,-- 11 1n AIMONA -at Fainouth, December I, from ' • AULOW -at he ity, November 27, •from ..................... - Aeitheey -at lien. December I, from ..... . Act or Tansies -at Liverpo .1, De Lemke 3 . AueLates -at Gravesend, December; 2, from .... ANN-at Gravesend, December 2, from ****************** AuoLrest-at Gray:end, December 2, from ************************ ANN tit:Draft -tit Greenest', Lecembet 2, ' .41 1 Mararesia -at Deal, December 1, to ******* *************** iset 111111CIIANT-at Deal, December 1, (M. Q .. 7 .--- -.uvets, Bosoorra.- at Desl, December 1, from ****** ************* BELLr. ALLIANCII-4 Deal, December !nap ************* 1 401 1 Menem -at Deal, December 1, from ******************************** Gtngyl **** Gorace-at Glewennown, December I, from.. ******* ************** Coicomaiumb -at Deal, December 1, Soul ...... Cam -at Deal, December I, from.- ................ I.***. l llll CHARLES-at Deal, December I, from ....... .................. CAsTILLAN MAID -at Deal, December 1. ROM . 7 ................... CAMBRIA (II.) •at Liverpool, December 3, .. "...must Corer-at Gravesend. December 2, from.„ ................. Gesture-at Gravesend, December 2, from ....... ........ ---11 ePv CAROUNDA-at Graverend, December 3, . "*" - tm Dew Dkor-at Gravesend, December 2, Oven .......... DMUNDA- at Gravesend, December 3, Imen ............. Devoseistaz--eff Queenstown, December I, from .... RAMIANUA-off Bristol, !bra robe rI, from ............. Euzassret at Belfast, November 30, from -• ..8L ..... • ji . 6,4fs Ebrasua -at Queenstown, December I, Inse ..... .. Bun:-at Deal, December 1, from ........... ................... &MARLYN • -It Greenock, Nov. 30, fr0m............ „„„.... RIERMTA-at Hub, December 1, from ........................ EXPKEOI-at December 1, from ................. ........ Bomar -atGravesend, December 2, from ............... RAIL Amebae's-at Gravesend, December 3, fr0m...em...., Faeocratra -at Greivesend, December 2, from.. .............. yam FoRD HILL-at Granceial, Dectunter„2, from .... . . FLOArkM Crte-at Graresend, December 3, PANIAVELL-at Deal, December 1, HUI .. . ...... Veer TILADI-at Dval. December 2, from . - ..... DAMMLE-at Queenatovm, December I, fr0m,.... • ...... Genus-at Gravesend, December 2,_ from_ ........... HENDRICK HI:MON- at Gravesend, December 3, Ileennee-at Deal, Docenitier 1, from ...... 11KMOUCK WRINIKIAND-Ft Fahnouth. Dee. I, ....... BECTON -at Hub, December I, from Iltuther-at Deal, December 2, from Hues AND CATUMUNA-at POIiSMOUtb, Dee.l, Ina -at Gravesend, December 2. from ........ Jase-at Gravesend, December 2, from. ..... - Joule Brace -at Gravesend, December 2, Joule DeLL-at Deal, December I, from Frrale-at Deal, December 1, from .--Tersm FARR AND Maile-at Dull , November 30, from Thha Juso -at Hull, December I, from like n S i t ain fT n er . - . ,HuII , ELKIN CATNINCA- at Gravesend, December 2, from_ Whitby, lkeem ber lices i' aibe tre r l, from ....... _ ..... LOYAL BRITON-at DEA. December I, tram ...... Lens-at GLegow, December I, from Maur Ayer -at Queenstown, Dece ben I, fr0m..... Maar Mem -at Deal, December I, from ... .... Male Jars -at Falmouth, December 2, from. ........ HOUNTAINIER-at Poole, December 2, from ..... HART HARIA-OR Dover December 2, bun tr itr i mai . IHARIMON-at Deal, De cember 3, from Retantsve MART-at Bristol, December b, from 31.11snes 31 sae-at Gravesend, December 2, from . ... .......... 11Ma TIFFIN-at Gravesend, December 2, Sem Pewees N hernia-at Deal, December I, frog Gedtr OLYMPUS-at Meothampton„ December 1, from EL sem's, lu, PRINCE OF WALES-at Gown December 2, from ............ PRINULR-at Queenstown, December I, from.... ................ Purses:re Vic-roma-at Queenstown, December I, hvm .H .. tit Ja s e Paomenisee- at Deal, December I, from Quante LEITCH-off Falmouth, December 1. from . 1% . Iteauts.- at Queenstown, December I, ..... RD. amber -at Deal, December 1, from ..._ ROCKET-at 11u11, December 1, from Renuer-st Portsmouth, December I, from ........ RICOVIMT-at Gravesend, December 2, tram . ..........„„_ _ .... Sreeczarrum-at Graveeer.d, December 2, fr0m .. .... Mona e A „,, KriathroNE-at Queenst - own, December 1, Men KEN 8017TRDIMON-at Pertsmouth, December 2, hamGrum,: Seema-at Glasgow, December . l, from Tare: l STANLEY -at Poole, December 2, from Seekm.,:a Toms -at Gloster, December I, from Et. Mateo risen-at lievrich. December 2, from ................. VOINN -off Margate, December 2, from Crams Wm-tau-at Portsmoutb, December 1, from FRO WhirPOINT-at Liverpool, December 3, tem Newton BAILED. A.Z.-from Liverpool, December 3, to Ste Tait Aimee-from Liverpool, December 3, to SAM CAN3IIIIXIR-from Liverpool, December 3, to Itee Tut Cattiest:a-from Liverpool, December 3, to. lldie erratum - from Gravesend, December 3, to Pain CAMRLAN-from Cardiff, December 1, ID ...... Ness CIRCASSIAN -frrm Falmouth, December 1, to labia Colombo-from Falmouth, December 1, to ................» j . Csmooms-from Hull, December 1, to SA* CORININIAN-tram Hull, December 1, to Carthame EDINBURGH-from Liverpool, December 3, to Bate', Et:am-from Liverpool,' December 3, to as* ELIRAHNVH-from Gravesend, December 3, to Mom Furter-from Liverpool, December 3, to acme Frantic+ - from Sbields, December 1, to .... Nubs Fora Stein-from Shields. December 1, to Panda Groeures-from Shields, December I, to Busdiell GRAN VON SCHWERIN-from Liverpool, December 3, to MI6 JANAICA-from Liverpool, December 3, to hoses Jeerma-from Shields, December 1, to Corms trine Deese-from Shields, December I, to St. Thum LITTLI Prim- tr. in Plymouth, December 1, to Pt. Indult Lsmcssrea-fr m Shields, December I, to Cantos Lemouse-from Shields, December 1, to ..... -i. o Joie Lemmas-from Liverpool, December 3, to Demme MARIA-from Gravesend, Decmber 2, to bur Meows-from Hull, December 1, to *Yew Odom Mime-from Sunderland December 2, to Odom O'Fzeast-from I ulmouih, December 1, to Lode .. . Pums—from Seleombe, December 1, 10 ' Tereful PlAXL—from Gravesend. December 3, to FL thibeele TROVOLDOVS—from Plymouth, Mamba 2, to 96thitie Tnoe.Cumixe—from Deal, December 2, to liko hale Vasrm.—from Cardiff, Deasbcr I, to -- OP. VICIVIIIIA—from Liverpool, December 4 to Ohl WANDEllalt—fsom Liverpool, Dieetuber S, to St. Lo 1 WATKILY—frog Gravesend, December 8. to .Portacoutek VESSELS SPOKEN WITH, Andmat.Nrlson, of leroey, from Buenos Ares to London, w3I lon of lolly-boat, spars. anti bu1w.414, short of provisions, ad having pumped up a quantity cf tallow. U., intended to call d Pernambuco, was lorded on the Itch ult. in let :2 S., lon. 31W. BIUTA NM/. (brig), oft Scilly, for London, Nov. 29. Emma, from London for Port Phillip, with emigrants, Nor. l, lt 13 N., lon. 26.48 W. Preernsaf, from Valparatoo for licerrol, Nov. 23, lat. 41.11 N. . - 29.19 W., Chreti, of Liverpool, for Maranlam, Nov. 7, lat. 04 N., lon. 60 W. Lmnonron (fhlp), of Liverpool, from Calcutta, Nov. 23, IA XII N., lon. 32.0 W. MATAIARI (brill), for Trinidad, Nov. A, lat. 22, lon. 31 W. MAT QuEr.tv. from China I.Jr London, Oct. 7. Savrtrons, Gilmore, from Batavia for London, Nov.l3,lat. NN, lon. 74 W. [Advertisement.]—HotLowAc's PILLS Al IN' TALLIULT CU RR FOR FINALE COMPLAINTS.—WOOIOI at Rifkin( petiole of life ore subject to complaints which require a peculiar atedteme remove, and it is now an established fact that there is twee so Walk as Holloway's Ms, and their purifying qualities render them n , L *Me to the maiden, the mother, and the middle-aged; them arsenals mg, cleansing, and yet invigorating, so that fema:es of all ages say take them with perfect safety, and it is truly astonishing to End the benefit that fa derived by taking a few doses, which speedy neon every species of irregularity in the system, and eatablish health m a firm basis.—Sold by all vendors of medicines, and at Professor litit> way's establishment, 244, Strand, London. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. DAVIE4.—Now. 39, at Storehouse, Olotteestershire, the wife 01W. • Darks, Esq., of adaughter. DAT.—Nov. 2%, at Bare-street, Bamford, Es es, Mrs. B. W. Day, d a Pell. MORTIMER.—Nov. 30, at Harlev-street, Careadish.square, therm of W. 11. Mortimer, Fq., of a * daughter. NELSON.—Noe. 90, at Ourlow-equare, Brompton, the wiled W. Nelson, Esq., of a daughter. REYNELL—Nov. 30, at Chtjrwell•row, Essex, Mrs.Reysell, of sat STEEI.E.-.-Dee. 3, at Crieidewood, Middlesex, the wife of A. I Bleck, Eq., of i son. TA UNTON. 7 Noy. 28, at St. Catherine's-terrace, Gtuldford, Kilt Taunton, of a daughter. TURN BULL.—Dee. 1. at 13,'Pottland-terrace, Regent's-Sukdb. T. 'furnbull, of a son. WHITE..—Nor. SO, at Clapham.rark, Mrs. J. B. N% lute, jun ,of a os. MARRIAGES. BLACRFIGUSE—BATT.—Dec. 1, at Upper Deal Church. house, C. 8., to Harriett, third daughter of Lieut. W. Batt, 11.11 CLERKE—GOSLING.—Nov. 28. a' Trinity Church, Bakis, by tY Lord Bbeinp of Worcester, William Henry, eldest son mow . Clerk', Bart., of blertsn, Flintehire, to Georgina, eldeeth o of R. Gosling, Fsq., of hotleyepark, Surrey. DOUGLAS—MANSFIELD.—Nan. 29, at Edinburgh, J. Dose* Esq., of Soatwell, to Jemima, youngest daughter of the la /. Minefield, Esq., of Midmor. FOORD—EGGINTON.—Nov. 29, at Kirkella, near Hull, the Ser.& IL Foord, of Trinity College. Cambridge, to Lavinia, thirddoughtet of the late J. S. Egginton,Esq., of Kirkella. FULLER—JARVIS.—Dec. I, at St. Lawrence Jewry. Lando!, II!. IL W. Fuller, of Croydon, Surrey, to Sarah, only daughter d' Jarvis, Esq., of the same place. GOOLDEN —TROUGHTON.—Nov. 29, at Holy Trinity Chtsdi, Coventry, by the Rev. E. Ness, Rector of Elthstone, Glaueestes shire, F. Gadder', E. of Maidenhead . Berkshire, to Mary , 6161 daughter of N. Trougaton, Esq., of Coventry. lITDE—HILLIEIL—Dee. 1, at St. Pancras Church, C. E. ETA Ent., of Guilford-street, Rusaell-square, to Miss &bine Afgs Ilillier, of Horsley. Gloucestershire. PHILLIPSON—APPLETON.—Dee. 1, at St. George's. square, R. Phillip-mu, Esq., 11.E.1.C.'s Bengal F-stablighrost ,g Mary Anne Frances, eldest daughter of D Appleton, Esq., of rig' DEATHS. BURTON.—Deo. I, Am, witeciißOrto Esq., of Amptt CARRINGTON.—Nov. 28, at Exmouth, Sir C. E. Corrine" 214 ' Chief Justice of Ceylon, aged fO. COBS.—Dec. 1, at King-street, Great Yarmouth, E. Cobb, 14. a Magistrate and Alderman of that borough. COPE.—Nov. 28, at Weymouth, Maria, widow of the late Lieut„-Gee Core. CRAIGIE—Nov. 27, at Jedbank, Jedburgh, N. 8., Christina Neitisni, wife of J. Craigie, Esq., aged 30. CUTLIBERTSON.—Nov. 29, at Brighton, Elizabeth. ridow 0 1 late W. Cuthbertgoo, Fog, aged 75. EDWARDS.—Nov. 29, at Dover-place New Kent-med, 106. I 81arah,teLiee:loty ofth s e b la,tvna.. e T . Edwards , . Esq., aged 77 . lino , or HILL.—Dec. 2, at Gravesend, Anna Alt, daughter of the late ur J. MURRAY.—Noy. 30, Caroline Jane, wife Of J. Murray, Esq., of LW liament-atreet. PARKER.—Nov. 27, after a long and painful Mums, hfarl, ll " Thomas Parkes, Eq.. of Bctchworth, surrey, aged 59. PRATT.—Noy. 29, at Janevitla. Mount Anville, Lieut.-CoL IL Tr" late 18th Royal Irish, aged 67. O. QUESTED.—Dee. 1, of disease of the heart, Mr. J. Q uested, REDBIAYNIL—Noy. 30, at Upper Brookatreet, W. T. &OAT . '" Eaq , aged 42. sib 14 0' SPEARMAN.—Nov. 30, at Leng-sere, Capt. J. Spear Man. of Foot, aged 70. VAUGHAN.—Nov. 38, at Ilk Xeres-road, Plikham. KW AIN Ill' of J. Vuitton, Esq., aged Prated Dad pablisbat by Maalox Kan Hot" street. in the My eet, of lowan, Prints r. st tm tio a, to looj. street, is thoyeeeinot at Whitetriars.—ltsavAT, memos Le•- Dec. 6 Jan. 7 Dec. 28 Dec. 22 Drc. 22 D3c. 24