The Express. — London, England, 1846-11-13 00:00:00

)4insonovon Au. AGED grata—Nit. Banbury's Meattude beat Mr. Arabia Q. Alpha. Not run eat. stdocsne.—lt wee I Amsted, Jost previously to Ohs he saires. that la iessthe intend= d the ice meter tie the leek Is ban, Neesislik_t_ez ejtibuathe____,_ within the welt It was hang. lust wapruy at met who We Ugh the mai stag ast bur davit the week woad be maw lee we& at • pee t OM le thaw who sold Mae 01 a wily imqp holima deg. went the lagetwasa 1031 he he ; tame masks barbs sirwig Mims pktim ( OR MOW. y..awl Weimid), mai gm hat* wil take Swe today. at mam Oar do *slag durse lime ius an TwanilM, the swi Wmaligas ti ...w .b....a. 4 . Li..yeed,..„6:....1461161 NM boar taillen ths very Istbr —ass awe Om awes (sag the nib assaw d die Peek POI alig ow at thaw) betas ntemot et Iteewb/ikeit, the M e = =whir li.Thseartribelii:avelan W=aia: doeMeng.bisk lis _Mot Chobt, aw a y ene tome. Ow ammo la Shrubs hal sid grawasegrn. Biro ftl eagail about Mg wateings al la boar kr Wad Chmer% Mesielisna. sad was at 101 taken la • pawl, ekes at saansian, air sleet se board aWs rat, the gret part at almost nail, egad. /MD Entrilfgenet• --.---- I LAW NOTICES.—THis Dor. Cover or CWAYCFRY, Westminster, at 10.—E1e•en UnOPPOled lunatic petitions. Cause petit order : Blake v. Lord Wa&abort (2) : Bristow v. Needham. A ppeals ; : Booth v. Creserlek, part beard ; I Fortes v. Leeming; Andrews v. Lockwood; Watts v. Hyde ; Eyre sr. I 1 . a ye z.Csarecninas' Covers, Westinhoster, at 10. —Bete. Mr L. Bluidwell.—ante petitions, the unopposed first and short causes. C 411104 petitions, /Ct., by order : Bern ford v. Arm*h, to be spoken v. to ; ,t,inions T. Simons, ditto; Cmhet v. LiniW.k (2) ; Hall yr orroo bo ; "ate v, Pick, _part beard ; Expecte Smith. petition; Carter v. Gili; Hobos T. Bell ; Mithad V. &Venda Causer, Grand Junction Grave( )C:a! V. Dimes, weaned ; Bower v. Scott • (q); Parker v. Day (2 : Jo *moon v. FORTAIT; Terry v. Weaker ; Simpson v. Holt. Before Sir J. Knight Brocc.—Twenty-three cense Client, Causes, lie.: Massey v. ;anion, to be spoke to ; Stewart v. by, by or der ; Append y , Page i Woodward ". Miller; Shaw v. Hill ; Coward v. Coward ; b .W.h v. Wielley ; nand' V. Francis (2); Edwards •v, Browne. Before gjr J. Wigram.—Frazer v. Jones, for rtiagnirst ; DuStotobe v. Levy, *.'? be eFek e , b, ; liter Motions, by order. CAUSCS : Dale v. Hamilton, part bean , ; l 'k)wuen v . Thelle : Blair v. Bromley ; &stock v. Shaw : Prestos ". Wilson ; Enurson v. Emerson :Hammon v. Sedgwiek • Warner v. Hodgson (2). Botts Cot ier, Westminster, at 6.—For judgment : Earl Nelson v. Lord Bridport. Caner, ne. : Perry v. Aleddowcrolt, part heard; At- Lord v. Magdalen College ; Teistel v. King's allege; At torney-Genenl v. Ludlow ; llopkinson v. Ellis ; Ott ley v. Gray ; Wil lie v. linuglas ; Howard v. Howard ; Lockhart v. Hardy : Ouwley v. Anstruther ; Hubbard •v. Tonsil • Stratford v. Beast. Cower or Cosmos BINCII, Westminster, at 10. —Sittings in Banco. Coeur or Cosmos Pia" Westminster, at 10.— Inkldleses Com mon e;JeParratt v. Berkeley, Psq. • Clayton v. J am; Wilkie T. Pil ; Mackenzie v. Hunter, Esg. ; Lake v. Williams J. G. Yearn v. Earl Me:borough (special jury) ; Fagan v. Webb; St ebbing v. Goodchild ; Scarlett v. Tucker; Ford v. Lltitard ; Carlin v. Lord Mesborough (special jul7) ; Reid v. Wellesley; Hollis v. Ewen; n r. Clarke ; Tbrupp v. Cuthill ; Fadenwilhi v. Iloboyd and an other;other Shaw v. Clarkson; Fridenwillti v. Smith. The Court will also sit in Banco. Corer or Eacirsuesa, Westminster. at 10.—Middlesex Common Jocks.—Tibbets v. Dalton and wife ; Cowan'. Cole. The Court will also sit in Banco. hall-street, at 11. — Seward v. Martin. &costumes Corer, Basing dale; Barnard v. "":"dale; Thomas ". Nance ; now v. Tame. ---- __ EQUITY COURTS—YESTERDAY. Before the Lord Chancellor. IN THE MATTER OP TBOUTBECICB ESTATE.—PETITION 07 Riour.—Mr. Anstey applied on the first day of term for a commission to be issued, to inquire into the facts stated in a petition of right presented by lqrs. Caroline Robson and Mrs. Ainsley, claiming to be the next of kin of a testator, of the name of Samuel '1 routbcck, who died in India in 1792, leaving a large estate, a great part of which he willed to be employed in the erection of charitable institutions in White chapel. These bequests were declared void, and they and the residue of the testator's estate were seized into the hands of the Crown, for want of heirs or next of kin of the testator. The petition prayed, in the usual way, that right be done to the petitioners ; and, with that view ,a commission should be issued, to inquire into the facts. The Lord Chancellor on that occasion observed, that the petitioners were entitled to the commission as of right, but if his sanction was wanted, be would require notice to be served on the Attor ney-General. The matter stood over for that purpose, and notice having been accordingly given, this morning the Attorney-General (with whom were Mr. Twin, Mr. Wrey, and Mr. Waddington, on behalf of the Crown), applied that the matter might be allowed to stand over for some time longer. Mr. Anstey . submittcd that no delay should be interposed by the Crown in the way of these petitioners—one of them was 80 years of age, and the other 76; and remembering that by the death of a petitioner of right lately (the Baron de Bode), that suit abated, and all the proceedings should be commenced again, he hoped his lordship would not grant any delay, especially in so plain a matter, and in which such an array of counsel attended for the Crown. He further stated that this petition was presented to the Queen in Juno, 184.5, and it was not until July, 1846, that it was referred to the Lord Chancellor—then too late to take any proceedings in it before the vacation. A large sum of money was in the pos session of the Crown, and there was no justification of further delay to the prejudice of these supplicants. After some conversation between the counsel on both sides and the Lord Chancellor, the application for the commission was appointed for next Monday week. SALKELD v. JOFINSON.—SIf Francis Simpkinson was about to open this appeal, which involves some nice questions on the law of tithes, when The Lord Chancellor said he could not hear the case without having the opinion of a court of law. Ilia predecessor seat a caw to the Court of Common Pleas. The Judges of that court were equally divided, so their certificate came to nothing. It appeared that is another case of pre cimely the same nature the judges of the Court of Queen's nch were equally divided. The only court left was the Exchequer, and the better way would be for the parties to send a case there. Mr. Wood and other counsel for the parties said they would prefer taking his lordship's decree. The case would in any event be taken to the House of Lords, and there the opinions of all the judges could be taken. The Lord Chancellor said he was bound by tho practice. As his predecessor (Lord Lyndhurst) sent a case to a court of law, he could not now do otherwise.—lt was then agreed -..nd a ease to the Court of Exchequer. name the Vice-Chancellor of England. BRENNER O. MCNAIR.—DISMISSAL OF AN AGENT TO THE GLASGOW AND LIVERPOOL STEAM-PACKET COMPANY. —This was an application for an injunction to restrain the defendants, who,were directors in the Glasgow and Liverpool Steam-packet Company, from discharging the plaintiff from the office of agent to the company, in which position he had been ever since the original formation of the company. By the affidavit of the plaintiff it was stated that he had been chiefly instrumental in forming this company, and had always acted as their manager and agent at Liverpool ; that at a meeting of the shareholders held in March, 1838, a re solution was passed that the plaintiff should be the managing partner and shareholder, and should have the entire and exclusive control and management of the affairs and agency business at Liverpool ; that subsequently to this, a contract of partnership was executed, dated in October, 1844, by which the preceding acts of the partnership were annulled ; the defendants were appointed directors, and power was given them to appoint a manager at Glasgow, and agents at the different ports, for the management of the company's ves sels and business, and to appoint masters, officers, crews, and servants, and to dismiss the individuals so appointed, and to appoint others in their place. The defendants, acting under this power, gave notice to the plaintiff that his services would no longer be required as agent to the company, and another agent was appointed. Mr. Bethell, on behalf of the plaintiff, contended that it was not intended by this clause that the directors should have the power to discharge a person in his capacity, acting as a shareholder and manager, but merely the servants of the company, and that the Plaintiff had taken a share in the company, and had executed the contract upon the express understanding that he was to continue acting as the Liver pool agent. Mr. Stuart and Mr. Shee appeared for the defendants. The Vice-Chancellor said it appeared that the plaintiff was dismissed on the 31st of December, 1845, and it would have been much more convenient to the company as well as to the plaintiff if this bill had been filed upon his receiving the intimation that he would be dismissed, instead of allow ing the directors to appoint aent and allow the tv to be conducted by him for another so long a time ; by this course the company had been placed in a worse position than they would otherwise have been. However, upon con sideri. ag the contract executed by the shareholders, in Oct., 1844, , he thought the directors bad full power to exercise the author ity . even them of appointing agents from time to time and did unsung such individuals so appointed, and to appoint others i a their place. His opinion was that what the directors had don • was within the limits of their authority. The motions vas emuequently refineL SIR ( inOnCilt LARPaNT c. Tete RICHMOND RAILWAY COMPANI f.—Celtril OF AN INJCNCTION TO RESTRAIN THE COMPANY • FROM TARING POSSESSION OF THE PLAINTIFF'S LAND.—A a injunction was obtained on behalf of Sir George La ipent,.in April laa, ee restrain the Richmond Railway C ampany from taking possession of certain pro perty been 'Wog to the p situate at Putney, until the co espanyehould have paid the purchase-money fee such propert v, The railway compeer/ havinc paid die money, and the sale I saving been compleSs the injunctiew was dis solved by arra Illoalart- Mr. Stuart and Mr. Miller now moved, on behalf of the company, that the plaintiff might be ardered to pay the costa o f th e p roce edi, Is, ea the ground fiat be had been guilty of mierepresentatit Dupont theapplicatiestor the injunctaen, and had committed rhos An delivering bie abstract of the title to the property. The Vice-Chani flet„ without hearingyr. Bethel and Mr. Fooks, who appear, far the plaintiff, mat s he considered that Sir George Lsrpent had perfectly good grounds for filing this bill ; the money was , paid by the company, and be had now to co nsider the ca se as' lithe cause had come on for heariag. If this had been the cue, and the money had net been paid he would certainly h. the continued the injunction, but that was now useless, and Is e was of opinion that the defendants ought to pay the costs o.e the motion, and the costs of the Mae. Before Tlce-Cll smeller Knight Bruce. ESDAI7,II V. MOLD/41U'. —JURISDICTION OF THE VICE- C BANC ELLOII3.—In this ease a plea and answer had been put in by the defendant in bar oaf the whole bill, and the plea being overruled upon argument in Trinity term last, the plaintiff had obtained an order of course, at the Rolls, for liberty to file exceptions to the answer.—Mx. Wigram and Mr. Bird now moved, on the part of the defendant, that the order made by the Master of the Rolls might be discharged, and that the exceptions might be taken off the file for irregu larity, with coats. The learned counsel contended, that since the new orders it was not competent to the plaintiff to Me exceptions to the answer after the date at which the plea had been overruled. His Honour, after referring to the statute* 6 Vic., chap. 5, by which two new Vioe- Chancellors are co . d, said that it would be plainly illegal for him to disohalZra an order of the Master of the Rolls, even though the order was Mtßajr 16, to Beni of course. As to the second part of the motion he doubted whether the excep ti ons were not regular ; but he would let that point stand over until Mr. Berrey, the clerk of records and writs, who was about to communicate with the other judges on tome other matters, had consulted them on this point involving the construction of the new orders. CROXTON O. CROITON.—FROM WHAT PERIOD PAY MINT OF AN ANNUAL SUN OF MONEY CHARGED BY WILL ON STOCK suota.o eoiiwaima.—ln this case a testator had directed by his will that so much stock as would raise an an nual sum of MI. should be set apart by his executor, and that the 501. per annum should be paid weekly to oue of his sons. The only question was, whether payment should commence from the testator's death, as an ordinary annuity, or from one year after his death, as a money legacy.—His Honour decided that the payment commenced at the expira tion of one year after the testator's death. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. THE QUEEN ON THE PEOSLCCTION Or THOS.WAHLET, ESQ., M. P., V. THE PHOEIIEIOII AND THE PUPLIEHEIL OF THE " MEDICAL TIMEII."—CRINLINAL INFORMATION. — The Attorney-General moved fora rule, calling on the pro prietor and the publisher of the Medical Tinges, to show cause why a criminal information should not be flied against them, for a libel on Mr. Wakley, one of the coroners for Middlesex, in his office of coroner. The alleged libel ap peared In the form of a leading article in the number of the paper in question for the let of August, that is, on the Sa turday immediately preceding Monday, the 3rd of August, on which clay the coroner's jury which bad inquired into the death of Private White, of the 7th Hussars, who died at Hounslow Barracks alter flogging had been inflicted on him, was to re-assemble, and hear the charge of the prosecutor, as coroner. The article, which was very offensive in tone, attributed to Mr. Wakley, in substance, that in the discharge of his duties of coroner, at the inquest on White, he had attempted to effect a gross perversion of justice, to throw guilt on a medical brother, and to give to the proceeding investigated a judicial sem blance of murder; that his motive was a desire to produce a public sensation that should favourably inflivnee his for tunes at the coming election ; that Mr. Wilson, who had been employed by Dir. Wakley to make a post-mortem exa mination of the body of White, and whose report ascribed the death of White to the conseq uences of the flogging, had received instructions from Mr. Wakley what rcport to make, and that Mr. Wakley was in the habit of sharing wit Mr. Wilson the fees on post-mortem examine' ons wh ich he ordered the latter to make. The learned counsel then read affidavits in denial, from which it appeared that Mr. Wakley had not originated the inquest on 'White ; and had held it only after information had been communicated to him fr om the Rev. Mr. Trimmer and another magistr'..le, which made it his duty to hold it ; that Mr. Wilsoli ead been engaged by Mr. Wakley to make a post-mortem examination of the body of White, and dissect the muscles of the spine, and the circurojacent parts, simply beeauselifr. Wakley, on his return from an adjourned inquest, at whisk the jurors had requested the Moiler to order some comp.tent person, other than those theretofore employed, to examine the spinal region of White's hack, had met Mr. Wilson in the street, and had requested him to undertake the task ; and that the allegation of pecuniary corruption was totally false.—The —tented the rule. BAIL COURT. THE QEEEN O. UPTON, ST. LEONARDS, AND BARN WOOD.--CREMINAL INFORSIATION.—Mr. Pashley moved for a criminal information against the parishes of Upton, St. Leonards, and Barnwood in the county of Gloucester. It appeared that there was a highway between these pa rishes, which was out of repair, and a Mr. Organ, on whose behalf the application was made, wishing it to be re paired, applied to a Mr. Woodbridge Walters, an inhabitant of one of the parishes on the subject, and it was at first agreed that the question of the liability to repair should be decided by the opinion of counseL Eventually, however, an indictment was preferred before the grand jury at the assizes, of which Mr. Walters was one. It appeared from the affidavit of the witnesses who were examined, that chiefly through his influence the bill was ignored. It was, therefore, thought that this was a cafe in which the inhabi tants of the parishes should be called on to answer in a criminal proceeding, according to the principle laid down in Rex. r. Commissioners for Paving Cheltenham, and Rex v. Justices of Hertfordshire, such proceedings were void, as one of the jurors was a party interested.—Mr. Justice Patteson : In those cases something was done, here the parties interested prevented something being done.—Mr. Pashley went on to say that he might have asked for a criminal information against Mr. Walters, but that would have involved a diffi culty, as it had been held that a juryman d was protected in the exercise of his functions. As regar the granting of criminal information of such a nature, authorities were cited from Style's " Practical Regist-r," Jenkyns and Hawkins. —Mr. Justice Patteson By taking this course you lose the benefit of the act of parliament.—Mr. Pashley : We are aware of that, but we are anxif us to get the legal liabilities of the parties fixed.—Mr. Justice Patteson: I do not re collect any case of each a criminal information being granted; but, as I have no doubt about our power to do so, you may take your rule. EIPARTE JONES. FHAEDI:LENT CONDUCT OP AN ArronNay.—Mr. RoggOps, y esterday, moved for a rule to show cause why James Vickery, an attorney of this court, should not repay 301. to William Jones. In January, 1838, Jones, not being acquainted with accounts, employed Vickery as his attorney, and gave him 301. to pay certain legacy duties with. Vickery, however, did nut do this, for Jones was prosecuted by the Stamp-office, and compelled to pay it, with 2/. 4s. Old. costs. Vickery left his residence and could not be found, but about three years after, on being'nset in the street, he offered his promissory note at three years. This was refused, and he again could not be found. This year he replied for renewal of his certificate, which revealed his address, and Jones now seeks through the medium of the court to recover back his 301.—Mr. Justice Patteson, this morning, Rail that Vickery being employed as an a•tomey by a stranger was bound to account to his client for any -money he might receive. Having considered the matter he -sat the rule. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. Sittings in Banco. REOISTRRTION AFPRAL/L—HATDON O. Tue OVERSEE). OF TieEterms.—This was an appeal from the decision of the revising barrister (or the Eastern division of the county of Somerset. It appeared that the voter claimed in rupect . of a rent charge, and his name was objected to under those cir cumstances. A person, named Nash, was in possession of the rent charge for a period of eight years, previous to the 27th of September, 1845. It was afterwards conveyed by . a deed, dated 19th of January, 1846, to certain persons m trust, including the claimant. The first half-year's rent became due on the 25th of March, 1846, and was paid on the 29th of April. The objection to the vote was, that as there had been no rent paid until the 29th of April, the 26th sec tion of 2 Will. IV., c. 45, had not been complied with. This section required that the voter should prove an actual posses sion, or a receipt of the rents, issues, and profits, r calendar months next, previous to the 31st day of July in each year. The revising barrister held that the terms of the act had been satisfied, and that therefore the vote was good. —Mr. Cockburn, for the appellant, contended that the decision of the barrister was wrong. In the case of " Murray r. Thorniley," reported in Barron and Arnold, 742, and in Lutwick's Registration Casey : 601, the Lord Chief Justice Tindal held that • party claiming a right to vote in respect of arse charge must be newly registered as being in the acted manual receipt of the rent itself or of some part of it.—M.r. Serjeant Kinelake, for the respondent, contended that as this was not the original rent charge but the mere transfer of ii rent charge, it was distinguishable from the case referred to. It was sufficient for the party to prove a reasonable mid equitable possession of the rent, as an the present instances was clearly the case.—The Court was of opinion that there was nothing in this case to distinguish it from the one cited. It was moat essential that the decisions in these cases should be perfectly clear and intelligible ; and, therefore, the Court would endeavour to remove any embarrassment which might arise from the observance of nice distinctions not warranted by absolute facts. In the case referred to the Court held that possession meant actual manual receipt of the rent, and in the present instance it was admitted that there was no such possession. Until the 29th April no money had been paid to any of the trustees, although it was due in the previous month. The facts, therefore, justified the Court in saying that the claimant was not entitled to vote, and that, there fore, the decision of the revising barrister must be reversed. — Decision reversed accordingly. Et MYOSIN, APPELL ANT F. FARMER, RES PORDENT.—This was an appeal from the decision of the revising barrister for the borough of Lancaster.—lt appeared that the voter's name had hexpunged, and the appellant now contended that his claim ought to have been allowed, inasmuch as the notice of objection was not in accordance with the act of parliament. Mr. Serjeant Byles, on behalf of the appellant, contended that inasmuch as there were four lista of voters for the borough of Lancaster, and as the objector had stated simply that he was on the list of voters for the borough of Lan caster he had net satisfied the requirements of the set of parliament. The question depended upon the construction of the 17th section of the Bth Viet., c. 18, read in conjunction with schedule B 10 and 11 of that act. This section gave to any person whose name shall have been inserted in any list of voters fen any city or borough, the power of objecting to any other person ; and it required that every party so objecting shall, on or before the 2.5 th of August in that year, g cause to be given, to the overseen, a notice of ob according to the rm of the schedule. The section alio pro vided that a entice be given to the person objected to, and if the party objected to be a freeman it was necessary that the notice be gives to the town clerk as well as to the party. According to the statute the person objected to bad a right to know the name and address of the party objecting. The law afforded him this facility fee conferring with the objector, and for seeing his title to object. For these purposes he was not to be put to any unnecessary trouble. In the case of " Todball tr. the Town.elerk of Bristol." reported in "Figot and Rodwell," page 38, it was decided that the de scription of the objector was insufficient, because it did not state in what particular list his name appeared. The cases of " Barton v. Ashley," In 15th " Law Jo.nrnal," page 36, and in " Pigot and Rodwell's Reports," saga 206, and " Knowles v. Brookey , " 15th " Law Journal , " page 197, were also in point. lie submitted that as the objector • had failed to state the particular " parish " to which he belonged, his notice ought not to have been held valid, an.i therefore the decision of the barrister ought to be reversed. Mr. Serjt. Kinglake, for the respondent, submitted that the notice of objection was perfectly good. The 17th Sullen gave the power to Object, and the 40th section empowered the barrister to correct mistakes which might arise in the formation of the lists. The 101st section enacted that every menu. place, or thing mentioned in the notice of objection should be so denominated as to be commonly understood. — Mr. Justice Mania intimated that the object of the ad of parliament in this respect was that the party objected to &mild have • clear and distinct notice of the description and .title of the person objecting to hint.-I(r.. Se*. K in ge THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY ,EVENING, NOVEMBER 13, 1846, proceeded to say that the name of the objector in this ease was not in any parish list, but in the general list of freemen, and therefore the schedule which referred to "parishes " could not be strictly followed. The Lord Chief was of opinion that, according to the broad and reasonable construction of the statute, it re quired that the person objected to should be informed upon what list the name of the objector was to be found. In the present case the notice of objection stated that the party objecting was on the list of voters for the borough of Idan cuter; and inasmuch as all the lists, however subdivided they might be, were lists of voters for the borough, this description was not so distinct as it ought to have been. The statute required that the lid should be particularised in the notice to be given by the objectors, and if it failed in this respect, the act had not been complied with. If then the notice was insufficient in not pointing out the particul..r list in which the name of the objector was to be found, was it competent to the revising barrister to correct the descrip tion as inaccurate, and to say that the notice of objection was available, because it expressed something " commonly understood ? " Looking to the rule laid down in the 101st section, he (the Chief Justice) was of opinion that in this case this misdescription was not such as the revising barrister had power to correct. On the whole he thought that the notice of objection was insufficient, and that there fore the revising barrister was wrong in holding the con trary opinion. The other learned judges being of the rame opinion as his lordship, the decision was ordered to be re versed.—Decision reversed. COURT S OF ngs EXCHEQUER.in Sane*. Shortly after one o'clock the ordinary business of this court was interrupted by the assembling of the judges, together with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Camp bell (Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster), Sir George Grey, &c., for the purpose of " pricking for," or nominating the Sheriffs for the ensuing year. circumstances, great difficulty was felt as to the beet course to bepunued. A party in London, however, at whose house the lunatic was staying, acted on the advice of a medical man Who was called in, placed a keeper over him, and ultimately caused him to be removed to a lunatic asylum at Stoke New ington ; this °marred in July last , and in this asylum the lunatic has been gradually growing worseand worse until atthe present time his mental condition is most deplorable. It was stated by Mr. Rupert Kettle, and proved in evidence that f the lunatic now exhibits not one , bu t every symptom o mania. is con duct is violent ; his reasoning power gone ; H he labours under hallucinations (amongst others, that he is the Saviour, a friend of Louis Philippe, and a son of Napo leon); his personal habits are of the filthiest description, and hot treatment of every one connected with him is bear upon unfounded suspicions. It the m ap from what was stated by his keepers, and the medical men who had attended him, that be had attempted self-destruction. Upon being called before the jury, the unfortunate man seemed totally unconscious of the objects ofthe procecdings,and q uite unable to receive a n y ex p lanation respecting it. lie could give no satisfactory reply to the questions put to him respecting his friends, although he named one or two persons at Birmingham, with whom he was connected in business transactions, and who, he said, were trying to defraud him. The jury, after ten minutes' examination of the lunatic, found a unanimous verdict, " That Thomas Teague had been of unsound mind since the 29th of July last." With respect, however, to the canoe of insanity, and as to the representatives or next of kin to the lunatic, they de clared that no sufficient evidence had been placed before them. The question as to the lunatic's property will, there fore, remain to be decided by the Court of Chancery. It was stated by Mr. Kettle, in the course of an elaborate and affecting speech, with which he opened the case to the jury, that inquiries for the lunatic's relatives had been induce triously made in vain, that his estates were going to deer:, n consequence of no person being authorise d to tees;, in t h e rents or to take care of the property, and that altli^,sigh they were of considerable valve, yet that the lunatic nim,,eie was so turned by the prosperity which his P.LICONIS in life had brought on him, that he estimated *:neir. at an enormous amount, offered to purchase the Alsylum in which he was rietor, and give the keepers confined, to pension the pr o t, 5,0001. each to retire and leave him in possession. The lunatic himself stated t o the course of his examination, that he knew his estat '..11 were valuable, tLat they were going to decay, but 'cha't he did not care for money. SHERIFF'S COURT. Before Mr. Under-Sheriff Barthel!. SIRTIIORP v. LAYSLIE.--ORATITCD/L—Thill was a writ of inquiry, the action being brought to recover the sum of 1351. 19s. 4d., from Mr. Cavendish Lapslie, a eon of Lieu tenant-Colonel Lapslie. The plaintiff is Mrs. Mary Ann Sibthorp, a lodging-house keeper, at No. 24, Howland-street, and sought to recover the amount of a bill for board, lodging, and washing, together with an item of 501., as money lent, for the purchase of clothes. It appeared that the defendant, who lately held a situation on the Morning Post newspaper, entered the plaintiff's house on the 12th of October, 11342 a condition which excited her compassion, and be rer- . . a tn e d there until 1845, without offering any rer-_,nneeeti,m, although he lived at the plaintiff's to ;e. At lengt h he left the plaintiff's house in an, ungrateful manner. When applied to for payment by tht plaintiff 's solicitors, he made a distinct promise of payrsent.—For the defence it was argued that the plaintiff Ktct entertained the defendant as a guest, and that she hail never recognised him as a lodger. To prove this, two letters addressed by the plaintiff to the defendant were read, in which she said she bad the time affection for h'.n as if he were her own offspring, and hoped God would bless him for his ingratitude. She said she should retain all his worn-out clothes, and an old pipe, in remembrance of his conduct, and hoped he never might meet with a worse friend than she had been to him. She concluded by imploring blessings upon him, and a hope that he would never have to repent of his abuse of her kindness. • The court having summed up, the jury, without a moment's , hesitation, gave a verdict for the plaintiff, with cos ts . , PROCLAMATIONS OF OUTLAWRT.— Proclamation of out • lawry was made against Arthur Wellesley Williams, Samuel Bertie Ambosse, George Pitt Rose, Samuel George Beamish, Francis Charles Perry. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY. Before Mr. Commissioner Evans. ROBERTS v. GOWER.—PRIVILEOR OP A ROYAL GROOM. —His Honour said,—ln this case the plaintiffs recovered a judgment in the Court of Exchequer against the defendant for 51.85. 11d., and 41. 19s. Bd. costs. They then applied for a summons, calling upon the defendant to appear in this court, under the S& 9 Viet., cap. 127. Such summons is sued as a matter of cause. Upon the date of appearance the defendant did not appear, and it being suggested that he was a groom to her Majesty, in daily attendance open her, I adjourned the matter for some days, intimating that in my opinion he was bound to obey the summons, unless he could , give a sufficient excuse. On the day of appearance by adjournment, counsel appeared, and stated that ho appeared for the Queen's Muter of the Horse ; that he was instructed to make no excuse, but insist that the defendant, being a domestic servant of her Majesty, was privileged from attend ing in pursuance of the summons. The learned counsel then cited several cases to prove that a domestic servant of hu Majesty was not liable to be arrested for dt. I told him that I was quite aware that such was th e law, but begged him to state any cues decided that any person was privileged from obeying the process of a court of competent jurisdiction. He did not favour mo with any such authority, and I have been unable to discover any. If the defendant be privileged from obeying the process of the court, all peers, members of parliament and other privileged persona, would be jus titled in disobeying all process from courts of justice, from attending as witnesses, from answering bills in equity, and from being examined in this court. Such a privilege would be most injurious to the public, for although not a large portion of the public, yet they are a very influential portion. Since I have sat in this court, I have issued summonses to a very great number of peers and members of parliament, and none of them have refused to obey. Had any one done so, I should, without hesitation, have issued a warrant for bringing them before the court. The question is therefore very important, but it also appears to me to be without dif ficulty. As I have already stated, I can find no case of such a privilege, and I find that it was decided in Serjt. Wel lesley's case, 2 Russell and Wigham, 609, that there is no person privileged from being arrested if he be guilty of a criminal contempt of a court of equity. This case has bens cited and approved of in many other cases, and this case would. I think, be sufficient to warrant me in commi the defendant; but in the case of the King v. the Bishop a/ St. Asaph, reported in 1 Wilson, 332, Sayer 50, it was de cided that an attachment may issue against a peer for refusing to obey the process of the court. To the same effect is the King V. Ferrero, 1 Par. 636. See also Miller v. Knox, 4 Newbans, 574. In the King a. Preston, 2 Salt. 278, it was decided that the Court of Queen's Bench was justified in committing a peer who refused to be sworn. For these reasons, I feel compelled to grant the warrant which is - for. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. Before Mr. Commissioner Harris. ADVERTISING DISCOUNTERS. -- The insolvent, named Hance, who had passed this court and the Court of Bank ruptcy several times, was described as a bill discounter's agent, and was opposed by three learned counsel. The in solvent had been in the habit of raising money upon accom modation bills for gentlemen with whom he became ac quainted by means of advertising in the different newspapers. The case of Mr. Small was first entered into. That gentle man had answered an advertisement of the insolvent's, in which he offered to get bills discounted for " gentlemen upon their personal security ;" a correspondence was established between them, which resulted in the insolvent's drawing a bill upon Mr. Small for 3001., half of which sum was to be handed to Mr. Small, and the other half the insolvent was to retain, each to pay their own portion when the bill should become due. The sum raised, however, was only 2001., of which Mr. Small received 70/. instead of 100/., but he was now liable for the whole amount of the bill. Mr. Low's opposition was for damages awarded in an action on a bill of exchange. The bill was drawn by Maria Hemming on the insolvent, which she paid to her landlord, a Mr. Phillips, and, upon its becoming due, the bill was honoured by her. By some means, however, it afterwards got into the hands of the opposing creditor, who sued the insolvent; and, when the case came on for trial, there being no defence, a verdict was given against him. It was contended that the insolvent's plea to the action was frivolous and vexatious but the court considered the case to be full of suspicion , and thought the objection hardly sustainable. The opposition of the Rev. Mr. Travers was then gone into. The insolvent had received two bills from Mr. Travers for the purpose of being discounted; the amount was 4101. Upon receiving the two bills, the insolvent placed them in the hands of a Mr. Levy. Some time after, the Rev. Mr. Travers applied for the return of these bills. The insolvent, how ever, could only obtain one of the bills m Mr. Levy, the other having been paid away. Mr. Travers had never received any money upon the bill, which the insolvent declared he had repeatedly endeavoured to get back for him. The insolvent wrote a letter to Mr. Travers, cautioning him not to pay the bill when due, and undertaking to defend any action that might be brought against him (Travers) on account of the bill. An action was afterwardsbrought against Travers, but instead of going to trial he settled the matter, and then brought his action against the insolvent upon his undertaking. The insolvent pleaded to the action, but on trial the verdict was given against him. It was contended that this was a frivolous and vexatious defence.—The Com missioner held that an action for damages was not within the penal clause of the statute. The defence, to be frivolous and vexatious, must be to an action for debt. Here no debt existed until after the verdict was given. He added, that the law was not made to protect parties who were weak enough to connect themselves with advertising money lenders. Those who had dealinis with such parties must suffer the consequences. The iveilat would be discharged. Discharged accordingly. ive,cii COMMISSION OP LUNACY. An interesting inquiry, under a Commission de tuna floc issquirenzlo, took place yesterday, before Mr. Corn atimioner Winslow, at the Manor House Tavern, in the Green-lanes, Hornsey. The alleged lunatic, who was named Thomas Teague, has for many years past carried on the busi ness of a plumber and glazier, in a considerable way at Bir mingham. His history, and the cause of his insanity, as detailed in the speech of Mr. Rupert Kettle, of the Oxford circuit, who appeared as counsel for the commission, were curious. Teague was a native of Wales, of humble parent age. At an early age he went to Birmingham, where he worked in the shop of a painter. Having saved a little money, and taken advantage of the favourable accidents of life, he commenced business on his dwn account, and by great indiurtry, real, and perseverance, amassed considerable property. In the course of time he purchased land, and i built houses n and about Birmingham, and also be came a landed proprietor in his native county. This prosperity, however, proved too exciting for a mind not naturally powerf ul. Two or three years ago he exhibitedptoms of insanity, which, in the month ofJaly hot, during a sym bushing visit to London, developed itself in a form too clear to admit of doubt. The peculiarity of the case, however, was that no one knew who were the lunatic's relations. No one who had known him had ever met with any one with whom he claimed acquaintance, or had heard him speak of 7 ;•latives, save once, when he accidentally dropped that a ...4ted of his had gone to America in early life, and had never ss yea been heard of. Under these ein,ndar 1 per Cent Grow& Bond:i 0--- 5 per Cent. Mexican Ws., Acct., Nor. 16, 22) 4 per Cent. Portuguese Bcodx, And., 564 5 Per Colt Spanish Bonds, Acct., Nov. 16, 66 4 4 POLICE v _ESTERDAY. CLERKENWELL. ROBBERY. - Joseph Judd was placed at the bar, charged by Charles Marlborough with stealing 130 sovereisrns.—The prosecutor and the prisoner lodged together in a house, No. 3, liayward's-place, Wood bridge-street, Clerkenwell, and slept in the same apartment. 41 The former was porter to Mr. Lemaire, egg-merchant, of 1( Tumnall-street, and by industry had contrived to save 130 17 sovereigns, which he kept in a box in his bed-room. Forty sovereigns were found on the prisoner when taken into custody, and half a sovereign, which was identified by the 3 1 prosecutor as being amongst the property stolen. lie had 4 , also been traced to have been spending money extravagantly. 2; —The prisoner denied the charge, but was remanded. MARYLEBONE.—EXTESTSIVE FRAUDS UPON TRADES MIN BY A FEMALE.—EIiza Clarke, a well-dressed young female, was charged with having , by means of fraudulent re- i presentations, obtained shawls, &c.,of tradesmen ,to a consider- 1; a ble amount. The court was much crowded. On Wednesday, II the 28th ult., the prisoner obtained from Mr. Evans, draper, High-street, Hampstead, four shawls , f or which, as al- ; leged by her, she was sent by Mr.. Collins (a customer), who was desirous of selecting one. Inquiries were sulwiesvientiv made, when it was ascertained that the lady alluded to had not authorised any one to go to the shop. Nothing more was seen or heard of the prisoner until t he following Friday, 3 4 , when, after shelled endeavoured to " victimise " Mr. Naylor 1( of Kentish-town, in a similarly artful way, she was captured is by Bradby, 337 S, who met with her in the shop of a stay- 1; maker in Camden-town. It was also proved that she had 11 obtained seven shawls from Messrs. Johnson and Son, Ux bridge ; from Mrs. Luxford, Suffolk-street, Southwark, three r , pairs of stays ; from Mrs. Schooling, Warsiour-street, Soho, u five pairs of boots; and from Mr. Martin, High-street, High gate, six shawls and a scarf. None of the property has been 11 met with • and the prisoner, although most positively sworn to, denied ' having ever been in any of the shops. She was t committed for trial upon five charges. It SOUTHWARK.—A CHARGE OP POISONING.-IftS. Mary Worrell, the wife of a tradesman, living in Union street, Borough-road, made an application to Mr. Seeker, 1 relative to two men whom she found attempting to poison her.—The applicant produced a small hand-basket, contain- 2, t big various kinds of food, into which poison had been in fused, by the two persons she named , for the p ur p ose of de stroying her,—/dr. Seeker inquired how they had contrived to poison her food ; and she said that they contrived to in trude themselves into the house, which gave them an oppor tunity of putting poison in the sugar, the bread, and even in the meat ; that she was perpetually followed by them, and that they seemed not only determined to destroy her, but also her family ; that she was then under medical treat ment from the effects of the food she had taken, with which poison had been mixed.—The applicant, who appeared to be in a state of great mental anxiety on the subject, implored the magistrate's interference to prevent such a foul plot against her life.—Mr. Seeker desired the applicant to com pose her mind, that he should give directions for inquiries to be made on the subject, and that if it was ascertained such poisons as those she described had been resorted to for the purpose of effecting her death, the parties she complained of should be taken into custody. The applicant then thanked the magistrate, and withdrew. EDMONTON PETTY SESSIONS. RAILWAY Bye-LAWS AGAINST DKUNKENNLBI3. — Mr. Henry Lock, linendraper, was brought up, charged with being drunk and creating • disturbance on the Eastern Counties Railway, at the Tottenham Vale stat:on.—William WoRamses, porter at the station, saidthat the previous &re noon, about half-past ten o'clock, he was on duty at the station, when, on the down train stopping, the defend ant got out. He wished to enter the carriage again, as he had to go to the Mash-lane station, but was detained, as some complaint had been made that he was intoxicated. Upon being prevented, he caused a great disturbance.—Mr. Chapman, the station-master, said that the conduct of the defendant was so violent, that they were obliged to send to the police station, where he was taken.—Chairman : You proceed against the defendant under your bye-laws 2—The witness observed that, by their bye-laws, no per son is allowed in a carriage in a state of intoxi cation ; but ho was directed to press the charge under the Metropolitan Police Act. The defendant was such a state that the persons in the carriage were glad to get rid of him.—The defendant said that he left home early that morning without his breakfast, and went to London on business, where he took a glass or two with& friend, which got the better of him. He was fined 55., with Ss. 6d. coats. CAUTION TO DELLIELS IN FIREWOIII3.—Miss Mary Bourne, dealer in fireworks, Tottenham, was summoned un der the 9th and 10th Will. 111., with selling a quantity of catherine wheels, squibs, &c., to a boy named Wm. Sinclair, by which she was liable to a penalty of dl., without mitiga tion. The charge was proved by Policeman Greay and the boy, and the defendant was assisted by a solicitor.—The chairman said, that the bench had no alternative to lower the fine, but that if the solicitor of the defendant could find a clause in any subsequent act, of mitigation, he would make the fine less. He added. that on Guy Fawkes night his horse nearly ran nway with him, and a friend of his had a valuable horse severely injured in consequence of the fireworks. MONEY MARKET. THURSDAY Brims°. The increased demand for money noticed yester day has prevailed again to-day ; the rate payable for Stock Exchange purposes continuing at 24 per cent. This less favourable state of the Money Market seems at length to have produced a corresponding effect on the value of the public securities. Console have declined 8 per cent. It was however a particularly quiet day. The government brokers purchased a larger amount than usual for account of the savings banks, taking 34 per Cent. stock to the amount of 10,0001. The daily investment for account of the Commis sioners for the Reduction of the National Debt was made in tie New South Sea Annnities. Previous to one o'clock the r money quotation for Consols was a shade better than that fir time ; but, at the close of business, they were at 944 to I both for money and account. Exchequer Bills remain steady at lls. to 14s. prem. In the foreign house there was some heaviness in Peruvian stock. Spanish was firm at the rates of yesterday. The Five per Cents. left off 264 ; the Three per Cents., 374. Peruvian, 33 to 5. The Chilian Three per Cent. Deferred Bonds were rather in request, but there were no sellers. From Hanover, on the 6th inst., it is stated that the government had contracted a loan with four houses of that city, for 4,800,000 dialers, in order to complete the railways towards Hamburgh and Bremen. The loan is at the rate of 5 per cent. ENGLISH FUNDS.—Noe. 12. Bank Stock, 2044 51 Long Annaitief.„ 30 ream , expire 11 per Ct. Reduced Atinrdties, 931 Jan 5, 1560, 10 3-16 i India Bonds, .Cl O OO, 24 3 per Cent. Conn* Anna, 941 Ditto, under £lOOO, 24 19 i 1 South Sea New Anna., 911 New 31 per Cent. Anna., 951 11 Consols for Acct., 941 1 I N. Binh. £1.4 , 0. 144., 11 14 Long Annuities, expire Jan. 5, Ditto, 5001., 11 14 pm. 1560, 91 Ditto, Small, 11 14 ----- 1 FUNDS. 2 per Cent. Venezuela Bonds, 40 2i per Cent. Dutch Exchange, 12 Gull., 591 4 per Cent. Dutch Certificates, 92 11 2 • --- - EXCHANGES AND STOCKS ABROAD. VIENNA, Nor. 4.—Fire pet Cents, 1081; Four per Cents., 991 ; Three per Cents, 701; Lose of 1841, 136; Ditto, 1839, 127; Bank Shares, 1,534. Beaux, bor. 7.-Bt. Behold Sch. Three-and-a-Half per Cents., 961 bills, 921 money. Foreign Exchanges: On London, IL sterling, two months, 8 221 bills, 6 211 money. On Hamburg, 300 two months, 1491 money. On Faris, 300 francs, two usontre a , r ;2 money. thousoso, Nor. 7.—Austrian Fire per Ceuta., 11l Mlle; Bank Shares, 1,570 tills; Russian English Loan, 1061 bills; Ditto, lire per Ceuta Hamburg Certificates, toll bills, 101 1 money ; Ditto, let Berke Inscriptions, 1021 hills ; Ditto, Ffope and Co., 3rd and 4th Bevies, 971 bah • Ditto, in Certificates, 961 MM. New Four per Cents, Hope sad.&, 87 money; Ditto, Weigle, 87 bills; Spanish New Floe per Cents, 181 bine, 18i mosey ; Dane Actual Debt, Two-an:La-HMI pee Cents., 38 bills; Dank& Lash Loan, S 4 bilis. RAILWAY NEWS. The North Staffordshire, and Birmingham and Shrevrsbary Shares were done yesterday at some further advance on late quotations. lideed, the English shares generally were held with increased firmness. London and I Blackwell once more attracted the attention of the dealers as an eligible investment. The feeling, in the ease of the French lines, was also more favourable than it had been for ds t. ' Therewas pas a fair amount of business done in the share market at Liverpool. Chester and Birkenhead, and Cheshire Junctiens again [elk- Dewsburys were in :treat demand, and ran up to 16 pm. Huddersfield', Birmingham and Oxfords, and Dudley', too, were a fraction higher. West Riding Unions, long neglected, were beginning to be sought after. At Manchester the share market was quiet, and bt4 limited business transacted. Prices had a downwareB4- dency, Leeds and Dewsbury excepted, in which a fair tilisi ness was done, at prices rather higher. The market at Birmingha m was again very animated. The rise in the value of the particular descriptions of scrip mentioned in our paper of yesterday fßour was still ys noti as ceable.high Arnbergates were done at 6s. 3d. p. ; Valle at 355. p.; Shrewsbury and Birminghams at 21s. 34. p. ; South Staffordshire Junction Scrip, registered, I p a d Trent Valley Midlands, registered, p.; Shrewsbury Here fords, I ; and Shropshire Unions, I dis. ; Birmingham and Oxford Junctions declined, there being sales at GI p. ; and in Dudleys at 51 p. Towards the close of business, a rumour prevailed which, it is believed, has some foundation ; it was, that arrangements have been entered into for the sale of the Birmingham and Oxford Junction to the Great Western Company : at 101. 10s. pm. per share, the money to be paid when the iine is completed. An extraordinary sensation was prodt.ced by this on dig, and meetings were talked of to declare the opposition of the aharcholders to any such arrangement. At Leeds the share market did not equal, in the amount of onus of trantacted, the dealings of the previous day, but prices of shares, in which sales were made, invariably hal an upward tendency. Leeds and Dewsbury' advanced from 111. to 121. pm. ; Dews bur y Branches, from 61 to 7 pm. York and North Midland (Preference), from 8f to 91; Ormskirks, from .5 to 51 • New East Laneashires, from 31 to 41 ; Huddersfield and Manchesters, from 41. 4s. to 41. 128.6 d.; North Stafford", from 3 to 31 pm.; North Westerns sold at 10s, pm. ; Glasgow and Dumfries, which sold early at par, advanced to 10s. pm. At Bristol the market was betaflater than it has been far some time past. There seemed to dealers to realise upon the late advances, and sellers prepon derated. Bristol and Exeter (Third Shares), 91 ; Caledonian (Old Shares), 231 ; Ditto (New), 21; Great Western (New), 71; Manchester and Leed s (Extensien), Si. 4s. 6d., 31; North Staffordshire, Si. 4s. 6d. ; York and Newcastle (Pre ference Shares), 61. 12s. 6d. RAILWAY SHARE LlSTS.—Losino'r. Nov. 12. Ncrra.—The quotations of lines in Roman characters denote actual transactions: those of hues in halms sellers' prices. PAID. .1121 2 [thane., Leeds 1 iharesq 4p. 1 21 Do. Fifth.. 13 1 fit tro.!fatc,arlis Il 21). 1 p. 75 PAID. 20 '.kberdcrn 041Ambergate - Dthalit.iikidley.., Binningli. li . Glmterll, .0 Do. Extenekm inn la 1L127 2 i bo l o " c (1"4 1 4d. 11 - 1 . 1 1 40 e li t i . le r e s l. 4l l3 es .-- 4 . .:;1 7 4 f 5 Bristol and Ereler... l s 7 1 p . 5 Do. Do. B 'l2l 3 Do . New 44 P. 1 Do. Do. C IS 10 Bristol and Gloster.. 20 2p. 43.,Manch.,11tax., it Mat 11 It Ms Birekinghossehire .., 1 Id. Siaterich. Ss Bouthansp 1 11 I 13 M ontan lit 441 lOW Midl an d 1133 I A Do. 4 shires 2l 21 Do. New 341 i 174 Cheater 4. Holyhead. 13d. I Do. Birin.4Derby 10J 1 3 Churnet and Blythe.. 111 20 Nevreastle& Bernick 33 1 5 Cornwall 1 1 25 Do. North Shields.' 24 Direct Northern. 11 1 3 Newm. 11114 Chestd....lsl 12i. Dublin* Belfast Jot. 8 6d. 2s North British 1371 / 14 'Eastern Counties 221 114 II Do. • Mires. 161 l Do. New 71. 3 Do. F=8 . . i .... .. -.... 6 Do. !' Leo. C. Ne.l IP. 11 De. 1 Do. Lto. 2' p. 100 Norfolk 2 Do. Tel. Extension 4 1 7 • Do. h sham 24 3; l 4 East Ltheaehire ...... 1111 19 92 Northern 4 Eastern 7l 7: 3 Do. New 981 45 Do.Seripliss.s die.) 61 6; 11 East Lisscolnshere. par. IP. 124 Do. I shares I ts 2i 13 Eastern t +lion 1 Do. New. 40 Edinburgh& Glasgow 75 42e North Rogue:l:hire_ 31 I 10 Do. 4 shares. 4 i 31 North Woks 3ft 121 Do. 4 share. . .1 2 1?t p llih 12( Oaf., Waiter., &W M 64 7 s l 121 &lila. and Nor4hWW 2 , 31 Portsmouth Direct 4li 121,E1y 8c Huntingdon ... 121 1 25 Preston and Whore 34 ' 5111theter, Tem., porc h . 31 1 4 Do. 4 shares 3 1 10 'Glasgow, Killet.4 4 68 c 2 I Sheffield h. Mena.- 271 1 04. (Co. & West (Ire.) 39 14 Do. Lincoln. Ja lust Gt. North of Megland 236 Mli 431 Vcottith Central. 7l II 5 Do. New l4 60p. 12, Scottish Midland 13 11 15 Do. New 38 411 p. ;4 Shrewebury k Birm.. 41 4.f 11 Do. New lBl 191! 42 e ,Shrupshite Union.... .Id. 13 Great Wester* 51 54p. 1 35 [South throe' 7 3d, 30 Do. !shares 28 30p. 3315. Eastern and Dover 481 10 1)0. shores 19 20 D0.N.(im.32.1.)N0.1 21 51 10 Do. 'ifths St 4 12 Do. N. ( IN. 6eAd.)-,1411 2 Do. New 4 alp. 15 Do. N. (do. 301.) 3111 2 13 Huddersfield, Mooch 44 4 4 p. 23 Do. N. (do. 151.) 4 1 , 5 i 3 3 Do. Estession 1 I sp. 5 liouth Wales 31 4 10 Hull and Selby 107L p 11 Water ord 4- Eilliert.l7 5d IS Do. 4 shares .. 26 . 42s West Riding Union la 21 121 Do. 1 shares II 12p. 10 Wilte,Som., Sr Werenti3l 114 Ipsw. &Bury Kt. Dim llf It at York andCarlisle I 11 Do. do. Norwich . 2 23 York and Newcastle 1 441 . 10 Laucaste rd. Carla* IS 20p. 3 Do. New 19 4 5 Do. New 54 ip. 50 York and North Midllo2 30 Leeds and Bradford 741 3 23 Do. 4 shares 50 171 !side and Think l3 40 Do. Selby 224222e2 Lee d s , Le Lpi ta ir t 4 er D : i 47 B ,. .l . l , e i 3 c . l l / 7 ;:d h „ . , . • 3 1 4 1 d 3 4. 205 Fo l ia : l N e r : Etem.‘ l V thi lim ; U w dg evre .El . 4 21 Lie. Man. &N. June. 14 21 16 Boulogne and Amiens IS 1 16; London & Blackwell.. 81 2 Bonl 'foul. Cate Cast. i 3 Do. New 2 24p. 4 Dendre l'alley... 40 Lori& Brightoo, 8.C4:594 6 544 Direct Bomb. at Madre 10 Di. Do. Fifths 461 6 Dutch Rhenish........ 1 I 9 Do. Do.Guorn.sgi. 4 lip. 5. i Fast Indian 124 London 4. Greenwich 994 3o GL Southn. of Madras 100 London & N.Weaternlo73 8 7 k.Gee , st West. Begat 2 Do. 1 shares 2 Do. New shares.- 14 6 Louvain ala Sambre. If 2 Do. Fifths l7l Iles 4 Luxembount 121 Do. Eighths 1 ~./ I .VadraB,Nel..4 Arcot I i S Do. N. I Mt. (`" It Namur and Liege 3l 8 D0.401.5h., L. 40 M. 10 Orleans and Vierson 21 3; 411 London St S. Western 67 1 7 1 6 thdeana It Bordeaux. II 4 40 Do. New Cons.Bths 10 12p. 5 Paris le Lems, Cond. 5 4 221 Do. New 3O 40 Paris and Orleans ...47 4t It Do. New if 04p. 20 Para owl Rowers 35 34 21 London and Fork- 1 01d. 5 Paris & Strasb. Dona 34 21 Lan., Ratio., & Yeovil 1 20 Rouen and 'lsere M 27 15 Lynn and Ely... l6 10 Sombre and Meuo _4l 1 15 Lynn and Dereham . 14 'Strasbourg 4- Bale 8 9 82 Manchester, Leeds ... 22 24p. 5 Tours* NanfesCosat 1 ffid 38 Do. 1 Mares. 48 6 Wed I.lantiers 34 a Linothern, Nov. 12.--11 ales t -Chester, Birkenhead (204 eh.), 1 p.-E. Counties (York Eaten.), 11 p,-Edinburgh , Glasgow (1 .h.), 1 104 p.-Lendoe, N. Western (1 eh.), 211 p.-Do. (new lah ), 131 14 131 p.-London, Manchester, Birmingham (f eh. /1), 71 p.-Midland, 1281-Do. (new oh.), S p.-N. Brill& (4 eh.), 21 p.-Do. (new eh.), 11 3s. 9d. p.-Shefileld, Maneheder, (1 eh., No. 3), Is. 3d. d.-8. Eastern, Dover (new oh., No. 4), 4 1144, 3d. 1 p.-York, Newcastle (pref. sh.), 5 p.-York. E. and W. Riding Eaten. (pref. eh.). 0 1 I p --calodontin, 11 1-Do. (1 oh.), 1 d.-Dundee, Perth, 4 5 p.-E. Lancashire (No. 1, new eh.), (No. 2, late Onn. and P.). 4i p.--Great Grimsby, Sheffield, 31 d.-Dltto (eaten. eh.), 11 6s. 3d. 4 el. -Huddersfield C. and R., 41 p.-Do. (eaten. eh.) 11 4 p.-Leecia, Dewsbury, 14 151 1 le p.-lerchs, Thirsk, 31 3 24 d.-Do. (new sh.), 1 d,-Shrewsbury', Osweetry, Chester (new M.). 1 d.-Anffierrate! i p.-Birkenhead, Lancashire, and C. In., 11 1 1 4 tie. 9cl. 1 1 28s. 9d. p. -Birmingham, Dudley, 61 p.-Buckinghamshire, 4 .L-Glasgow, Dumfries, 4 1 p.-London Direct Northern, 1 4 d.-Newry, Warren point. 1 p.-N. Staffordshire, 31 3 p.-N. Western, 11 130 . 9 d. 4 P. - Headline, Guild., Reigate, 13s. 9d. 1 lit. 3d. 1 p.-el. StaffordshireJn., 1 p.-W. Ri ling Union, 2 21 In. 3d. 1 2 41s. 3d. 24 p.-Dutch 'Rhenish, 4 d.-Fault India, 1 p.-Great Luxembourg, 3 d.-Matti cheater, Southampton, 1 d. MEETING THIS DAY. East Coast Railway, at the office in Moorgatemtreet, at 11 am. LONDON.-EASTERN CoUNItEs.-Ye-terday, a special general meeting of the proprietors of the Eastern Counties Railway was held at the 7sindon Tavern, for the purpose of considering and determining upon the conversion of all the 14/. Ms. shares of the corn. piny into charm of 201. each by the payment of U. 4.., and the addi tion of 4/. Mime, to take dividends from the 4th of January nest ; and fa" for considering and determining on the granting of equal advan- Mame to the Northern and Eastern Railway Company. The meeting was aloe made ;gavial for the purpose of granting to the holders of Latent Counties (York Extension) shares the right to subscribe all farther capital now required, or hereafter to be nnuired, for the par gimes of the company until the same be paid In MI. The meeting, "bleb was most numerously attended, was presided over by George Edam, Ea., M.l l a, who, in opening the business, mid, the objects kir which they were assembled were so fully stated in the advertim spent convening the meeting (which wog read by Mr. C. I'. Roney, the secretary of the company;, that it was almost unnecessary for him to detain the great body of proprietors now present with any observa- Mona. In the formal resolutions which would be submitted an altera tion would be made, in order to meet the suggestions and wishes of many proprietors who bad addressed the directors on the eubjeet. Those suggestions were to separate by some meam the stock created by the 4/. bonus from the other stock ; in other words, to have two dames of .hares--viz., one of 111, by the payment of I/. 45., and an. other clam of 5/, shores. Anxious to meet the wishes of the pprorominors who had addremed them on the eubject, the dlnstae proposed to submit this alteration of their original plan to the decasion of the shareholders. when be (the chairman) last met the proprietary, he expresaed the almost certain anticipation that the line barecrai Ely and Peterborough would be completed before the time. Various difficulties, from the slippery nature of the ground, bad, however, interfered to prevent the completion or the line, hut he might confidently announce, now, that it would be opened on or about the let December. He wag happy to intimate that Monne the lest half year the traffic on the Eastern Counties line had increased very nearly 50 per cent., and that the. revenue guild enable the directors to pay a dividend of seven per cent., though only 18 miles of additional line had added its traffic. At present the Faatern Coun ties Company pareeed a lima railway of 176milea in length, which had been constructed at an average coot of 41,000/. per mile. The company had already received the sanction of parliament for the con struction of 66 miles more, making altogether 212 miles, which, when completed, would, according to estimates, bring down the general average of cost to 37,4001. per mite. In the ensuing session applica tion would be made on behalf of the company to parliament for the following branch lines :-From Wisbeach to Spalding, 21 miles; from Spalding to Newark, 38 miles; from Ilockington to Lincoln, 23 miles; from Peterborough to Fothingham, 19 miles; from St- lye* to Ram sey, 61 miles; from Cambridge to Ware, 27i miles; from Cumbridge to Bedford, 30 miles; from Hertford to Ilitchin, 111 miles; from Tottenham to the proposed West-end station in Gnildford-street, five miles; from Stratford to Victoria-park, one mile; from London to Southend, 40 miles; and from Braintree to Halitead. This gave a total of 235 milts, making the whole line now COD. structed and in contemplation by the Eastern Counties Company, of 477 miles, which, including the profaned weet-end terminus in Guildfordaitreet, would be constructed at the estimated average cod altogether of 27,6661. per mile. Still, with all the outlay which would consume most of the revenue arising from the York Extension shares, be believed that on the bonus of 4!., as well as upon the whole capital of the company, would enable them to declare a dividend in July next of 7 per cent. The resolution, ae amended to meet the wishes express d (se he had already dated) by many shareholders, would now be submitted to the meeting.-Mr. Duncan, the company's solicitor, read the resolutions, but they were received by an almost general cry of " No, adhere to the original proposition."-The Chair. man said he was decidedly favourable to the original plan, bet he would take the sense of the meeting upon the matter-On a Mow of hands, the original proposition to create 201. sham, instmd of the two dames of IN. and 51., was carried without a single di, sentient. After same general convereation in which Colonel Williams, the Bev. Mr. Arktt, d Cambridge, Mr. Levy, Mr. Nathan, and Ohm . tietors took part, the following reso lutions were mialeisleaV. adopted :-First, that upon the pay. meat on the 10th homey Beat of H. 4s. per share on each of the W. 16e. shares of ItS sonsWY s capital, the same shall be converted into Mt. sharm, lades Xadends from the 4th January next, and that equivalent advanhats be granted to the holders of Northern and resetsen as flasistly that the whole of the capital of the Reshan Cateatiss (Teak Exhasion) sham be called up and szl i telesse I t ig e th;directo h rs a iatheiriliscr et ves, t ion, he a:Le ftism salty Ward Xakloa and Witham Beflermrs and la tlis 111111111.1wigaii, and all other sztossiess Ibis, and worts slit& Na eessomr mar death powers to sesstroet awl mar dims bites mq saw Assn er stock shall be maws t bp the som "whorl that the holden of York Extensica Anna liall, tetra paid eq. peNlipate with the Eastern Counties and Northers sad Eastern Loa.- rateably in any further creation of' mar dons. On the sosowsof Ilr. Cash, seconded by Cot. Williams amiss wee voted by aeshoilles to the chairman and his telleefille 1 1 1 the direhtion, and ths slhagliffitnalL PROVINCIA L.—WEAR VALLEY RAILWAY.—Yeab o g n .• a special general meetingof tbe proprietors of the Wear Vary -.7 - was held at their offices in Darlington for ,he purpose o r the expediency of taking on lease, or of purchasing the Bishop and Wcardale Railway. the Weardale Extension, the Wear me went, and the Shildon Tunnel Railways, with the anditlems an Fill., a lease should be taken. G. 11. Wilkinson , ~ occuphnii th e A report from the directors was submitted t o the was which it appeared that the Collide-action of the line was satisfactorily, and would probably be opened fur traffic text mielle Prom the restricted means of the comminy, however, tit e r rs numbe, and other circumstances, the directors MOM. soniipanialiOn with the Wear and Dement, the Bishop g ini t a land and Weardale, and the Shildon Tunnel lines. The n g,... -- Loges of such arrangement were pointed out by the chairmaiL % . report hiving been adopted, after some discussion, the Chair:map & posed the first reaolution, to the effect that it was e x p e di ent, ad in., company did thereby consent, to take a lease of the Bishop and Weardale, the Weardale Extension, the Wear and Derresi hak • war., and the Shildon Tunnel, or such parts thereof as wadi; agreed upon, which was carried. The following resolutions then put, and passed almost unanimously :—That it was eimeilmehe purchase the above-named railways, their property and An% . , such term..., conditions, and at such period, Wilke motaiskesagsgi montane agree upon ; that the directors of this company be loam wri.,:o mg power to negotiate with the other companies, sod to rate with them in applyingpar parliament an t ac t : o r fp:i iw ian c ie h n a t n eu ite, en t z t r bbe y o ing ritldce o n u to t th th aop ere opr , w ,b cs jeeta in , and the co m n eah lirm th i h n e g ; any tutt ageee sithe „muse * est I us may be sufficient to enable them to carry out the d pa objects, by creating new shores, and by borrowing money it li d, times, and to divide and consolidate the same in such manner aim s company should determine at any general meeting ; and al. Ire powers to consolidate and convert all or any part of the edsgsg e . new slimes into capital stock ; that the directors be fully eimpsei nt in the mean time to adopt such other menace., masiitmit silk , their actof parliament, as were necessary and expedient foe amt. , into effect the objects mentioned in the foregoing resolutions. Mi i hr it i • haring been voted to the chairman, the meeting separated. Blastoff AUCKLAND AND NV EAnUstit, &C.—At thetas; of the preceding meeting the proprietors of the Bishop Auddim ia 4 Stockton and Darlington Railways met for the purpose of eamilini te the expediency of leasing their tine* Sze , when remisititme In le . cordanee with those pissed at the above meting, were bd FOßElGN.—Nournenx OF F It. l NCE. — Theltittater of Public Works, the Minister of Finance, M. Lem:and, and M. Greuei e . accompanied by several friends,. lately paid a visit down thi, h se i; far as Lille, where they were puled by M. Maim, Director-Cenral/if Belgian Railways. The ministers preferred journeying by as ~,,,di. nary tram, the better to enable them to judge of the real .state ors am. rations They were received at the Paris station by the limos j, d e Rothschild and M. Emile POraire, director. of the vononny. Ate e having eramined in detail the different departments in o , , retiot a the station, the ipwroy started. Arrived at Amiens, the nuty o z . .eyed with approbation the passenger station which is to serre is the b nest of the two companies of the Northern and Boulogne f in , At Lille, the convoy entered for the Mat time into the heart of ty town by means of a temporary rail. The works of theultinatesania not being yet commenced, the minister, could only inspect the list chosen for the same, and in a conference with the meted of ths department and the ntaym of Lille, it was determined that iromnlists operations should be commenced for the Nation, thus providing act for the unemployed, and endeavouring to insure its completion MM. taneouslv with the Calais and the Dunkirk branches, which are Nog carried on with the greaten activity. the minister returnal to Pets next morning, having performed their visit in twenty-four lionn. Ip. COMMERCIAL AND MARKETS. PRODITE.-3,IISCING.LANZ, Nov. 12.—The sugar market has lista eery dull to-day; there has not been a public nab:, and only 230 Pik of We'd India slid by private contract, lout prices remain unalte• a Refined continues dull.—(ogee: WOO baps of Ceylon were effendi public sale, part plantation kind, which sold at previous rates, p a r 110 native, good ordinary, a portion of which found buyers at Ts. 6i; the remainder bought In, which saarecly supported toenail. ear, Pimento SOO hugs sold with spirit, 44, 41, which were very ha prises.—Sadpetre : Retraction 2 of fine quality, sold at 255. ' 2;4.64 a but refract i on was bought in IN.—Cotton continues dull ;440 a a sold.—Rum steady ; prepa Leeward% id., 2s. 24. • East bk proof, 2s. 3d., 2s. 4d.—Tallow has been steady ; 41s. 34 401. 41. • a the spot, ass. all the year.—Ginger Cadent offered and taw 30 in at 425. ; African sold at 300., Ws. 64.—W00d : Sagan soil from IN 51 51p. 141. 138. Tea: The demand fur sound ;ninon Congou tannin's* IS 91d., but importers hare become reluctant sellers. 53 COTTON.—Lir LRPOOL ; Nov. 12.—The market to day was quiet ; tls 19 sales 3000 bales, 1000 on speculati in. i3p, StAsciir.irriat, Nov. 12.—Our market today has been eery Tit 1p In cloth and yarns, a limited business done; prices are link boa than nominal, but the tendency is downwards. ='.Tl iip. ler 35 SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.—MAni. ID ARR. DEE. AWL DEN. LIR IR • 4 Dublin 3 Waterford 0 1 France 0 0 Bes&HalifatNorli Ip. 1 Donaghadee 3 0 Guernsey Sc Jera 0 0 Mediterranean... 0 0 West India Nes. 23 4 0 Hamburg 1 Holland. GIIAVESINO, Nov l2.—Anived ; Milacron, from Copeubager, ning, from Nyborg ; George Guildford, from Petersburg ; Ilatopits, from Cronatadt ; Ord, from Peter-hurg; Nimrod, from nom Prinds Christina August, from Norway; Aurora, tram Paha; p. Ilerkus Monte, from Kom i niberg ; Diadem, from Peassburg ; Bs. mann Wilhelm, from Denmark; Wanderer, from Petersburg; Da I Nyeprove, from Kiobenhaven ; Hendrick, from Emden; Maria ffia. both, from Norway; Johanna, from Konigsberg; &km, ten !p. Dantric; Isabella, from Riga; Die Krone, from Dwitrie. :Isk of Wight, for Mauritius; Emma, for st. Michael's; Brunette, for Ceylon ; Rapid, for Trieste; Falcon. for Guernsey; Chalks, he 4 I Tobago; Prince Albert, for Jamaica Ide, for Nall= I D'Atinrllati i for Ihmduras • Caroline, in ballast ; Concordia, for Guernsey. Leman/et., Nov. 12.—Arrived : Boa F. from Mona ; Sophia, ha Labia ; 1/avid /tools, from Palermo; facile and Tarolinta, trollies g York. Sailed : Express for 31: ranhain; Hope, for Trinidad; Sway 2 for Syra : Pythagoras, for Port Philip ; Ocean, for New Orksa; 1. Watt, for Gulf of Mexico. New TOME, C/Cl. IL—During the hurricane of the 3d get, deli lowing vessels received damage :—The packet-ship Itoseius putedber moorings, and had her stern damaged. The British schooner. lying at anchor in the stream at Portland, the 13 th, was run pastel , lost bowsprit, and had her boirs stove. A brig, with a bighdeek, .lift streak and white archboard on her stem, steering west order Mrs. masts, was passed en the 3 0 th ult., in lat. 37. long. 73, by the Nair Hersey, arrived at Boston. A large vessel. bottom upwards, is repaid by telegraph to be off the Highlands. The Ellen Brooks, fro mlirm 1i pool, which arrived at Boston on the 10th Gut., threw a tort ribs cargo overboard in the gale of the 19th to the 21st. ult. Oct. 21-11 a wreck of a ship or bark, apparently North American built, rid, laden, and nothing standing but the stumps of her three mitrandlos spirit, ends of the timber worked through the stern, and deekileada up amidships, was passed, the 234 ult., in lat. 46, long. 34; mita* 9th inst.. in lat. 39, long. 90, the wreck of a brig, with foremast to ins sprit standing, supposed timber laden, waterlogged and amass* and marked on her stern " Corn---, —busgow," by Use vernal, arrived here from the Clyde. The Odessa, from Windsor, Non se" to this port, went on shore on the Point of the Hook, the 17thZ but was gut off, and towed up here, the 19th inst., hating but little damage. A light, b earing w est, and large clouds el bird and white smoke, bearing S.W., supposed to proceed hem aural on Ore, were seen on the 27th ult., by the Lancashire, from arris - ed at Savannah. The George Palmer, from Lagana l f l ar m g. pool, put into New Orleans, the 4th inst., in distreia The flea from New Orleans for Bordeaux, put back to the former ;etas lid loot ,In distress. The British bark Calcutta, from Sierra Lew, ti condemned at Corte, the 13th ult. The Roman, from Ni and the Maria Spear, of Boston, from New York for Pas were in contact, received damage, and filled, previous to the :hint; crew saved by the Albion, arrived at New York from Brenda. 711 Norfolk, from New Orleans for Boston, arrived here on the 11th ant leaky, &c., and with part of her cargo thrown overboard in a be. Thane. The ltavre et Martinique, hence for due Marti, Wrack ina rock at Wilmington, in the gale on the 13 th inst., ut any ba fore and main masts. Itu.ATINU TO rue HEROINE AND liar: FORTITITIF, or trim— Dist/atilt-A were received at Lloyd's s erten-lay front the Adminly and Foreign-office: the former announces the arrival at ricara. North Australia, on the ilth of May, of the school, having on board the master and remaining part of the crew and Pia wagers of the brigantine Heroine, wrecked in Tines Strata, oo tht 24th of April last, with lose of eight lives; the latter advises that Mt master of the ling Gipsy, of Greenock, had reported to her 34)(90 Consul at Oporto having fallen in with the wreck of the Fortitude, al h Lynn, on the 20th of October last, in lat. 46 41 N., long. 2 6 ws ait no one on board. [Advertisement.]—Tun RAJAH or TBATANCOU AND llossoway's OperiessT.—On the I lib of July, 1846. Profewi Holloway was honoured with an order for six of the Imps a Pot" d Holloway's Ointment, from no less a personage than his Royal Iret• ness the Rajah or reigning sovereign of TriIVATICOM, thmust tha eminent firm of Stemma J. Cockburn and Co., East India merchant.' No. 11, New Broad-street, London. The ointment, it anTcos " the personal use of the Rajah, and will be employed under the sagas intendence of his private physician. Hollowilf , i Ointment is sold ek over India, being a certain cure for ulcers, wounds, son , . 101 abscesses, even if of twenty' years' standing ; and may be obtained of the Proprietor, 241, StraniL London, and of every mulleins-reedor. BIRTHS. BLACAMORE.—Now. 9, the wife of Mr. .1 C. Blackmore, Loostrootogeft. Exeter, of a daughter. PITZGEHOLD.—Nov. 7, at Kingstown, Dublin, the wife*: G. 11.1.1.1 9 a1ie E.q., of a daughter. MAIO —Mor. B, at Lower Gardiner. street, Dnbilu, MN C. Male • Wt., HILTO77.—Nov. 7, at 91, Stock well pls., Glasgow, Mgt" w • HOLE.—Nov. 7, at Salisbury, the wife of Dr. It B. Hole, a sint. HUTCIiE6O3L—No• 7, at 94, Bueeleuch suret, Glasgow, Kt" 11° ` ...- am, of • sm. LESLIE.—Nov. 9, at 2, Claarlotte.oguare, Edinburgh, Ws. Lane, $ daughter. ELPII2IL — Roe. 9, at 6, Alisslie.place, Edinburgh, the wife MR NKR , . Fag., of a daughter. NICOLAT.—Nov. 11, the wife of the Rey. C. G. Nicilny, of • daughte. PARMINTER.—Nov. 6, the wife of the Bev. G. H. Parminter, of %MOM. of a eon. ROBERTSON. —Noy- 10, In Ter/el-greet, Bristol, the wife of if. ItatiorMe X D., of • sou. 1100110 E.—Nor. 7, at Emhletoo, the wife of the Rev. O. /Woke, of • sm. RUSSELL.—Nov, 9, at 21, Gardoers.ereseent. Edinburgh, Yrs. A. ROMAN 0 O daughter. 111 . M .—Nor. 3, at Clermont, Latham., Seltzer's-9d, Yea Thompson, of ade ughler. • ant W A RD ..OP.—Nov. 6, at Grove-lane, Camberwell. Niro Wardrop.O. WILbON.—Nov. 7, at litowlangtoft.ball, buffulk, the wife of H. Rte' Pao., of • daughter, WODEHOUSE.—Nur. 9, at Wribbenhall, the wife of Colonel P. VW*" home, of a ma. MARRIAGES. ALEER.—Nov. 6. at St. George's, Dublin, G Miter, Egg., of Drumomdtk to Jane Bell, daughter of the late J. Adair, Esq. E GIBARBEHI4.—Nov. 9, at 20, St. Andrew-str e et, Edinburgh, by t..° Ranter, Teen church, D. N. Chambers, lag., of Glamow, to 319 M... I. th daughter of J. Dowse. Egg., of Edinburgh. QOUCH—Nov.It. at ht. John's, West manatee, by the Rev. Mr. lentti W aft onlantrylviag son of the late J. Crouch, EN • a g logtoo.park, to Eth elt, only daughter. of Yr. J. EtllVlrtil, brute, Rayleigh, Paseo. o 7.1 P.I.EIOT.—Nov. 3, at Elogdand chapel, by the Rev.?. Aveliag. o' Elliot, of 31, Addle...met, to RIM, eldest daughter of Mr • Shacklewell.green. JAMES.—Nov. 7, at Redeliff. by the Rev. a. D. Mereweather. bter W .,' 0, 9. James, Esq., of Park-Mace, Clifton, to Matilda Aoe. eldest dour Fysem, 800, of Bristol. cat a ' XASON.—At Newington, by the Rev. Robbutort, F. A 31. 3 • coif viviag eon of the late Lieut. R. J. Yams, RR., to Trollee , dattabtor of the late T. Robby, E.g. Dorta O'ROREE.—Nov.II, llolemorth•street, Dub WI, O'Connell, P.P. of Trim, J. R. O'Rorke, Dig., o fJa m e st own, D Cecilia, only daughter of J. A. O'Reilly, Eq., of Boyne Edit , W . 1 01., VANCS —Noe. 11, at BE Pamirs, Pimlico, by the Rev. T. l Ekes. eldest aon of A. Vance, Pp., of Rutland•opuire . Dublin, to you daughter of H. Dresser, Fag., of Rawson...a`, Waud. WARD—Noe. 10, at Lewisham, by the ]ter. C. Ward, m Din , • Ivor, Ewa , of Wisbesch, to Fromm ion, eldest daughter of Re. J. , of lilischhoult. DEATHS. at Cotter*, Mrs. ?nary Rosins Want, aged 7 _,• , 8, Wargaretta, eldest surviving daughter of •• • plow, req., of Denny, gimes. CHAWSRUS —Sept. 27, at Falmouth, Jamaica, J. Cumbers, 6 .. 0° ' of the irst Class Hospital Sue, aged 39. COAST.— F Nov.I 10, at Lawrence Weston, Henbury, W. Coast, Fel , Malmo( H.l4.'s 33nd Copp. Ret ie aged 69. COPP.—N „of Park House, St. Thomas, Ese:er„ CORLES. ov. —Nov. 6, in the C ggreen, Worcester, Ano. th , 0 of , Dories, Pen. Ournas.—Nov. 4, at liumfreystown, Wicklow, W. Cotton, 073. O FRA A r rtl lem l P" lVA N. l . r q— E N .— .7 ito ll t . . a l : o l' , W.C6, al " llmus ""t"73 o4 : Dulne Ur.. 5" . F rl ea l t" .":Pl77: ' ::3' tkerei to, aged . OAY.Nov. 11, 8 e o t Chemplon • hill, Surrey, the Rev. W. •, IleCa of Illdborough. 011440NMeabrough.Hrs R. 01 b... .110(W MAC-VARS.—Nov. A . at Folkettone, Brodrick, yoengt 94 rt.! Rabb, Eat.. formerly of Um Bengal civil service, aced tore r N: months. &AT HORANT — Nov. 11, at 93, Wimpole-street, Cavredial.sDA'e. Morsel, Esq., aged 38. O'HEILLY.—Nov. 11, at Hollinger, F. OReilly, Eng , re tell!, PETBREIN.—Nov. 9, a; 27, Hoceleocl,pbsee, Dlintutrgb, A. w 'q uailr ea s. g A; 7. 0,8tE . . , se Towe Skeern ooo bistel bashed by W.usur Joeb. of N. l l ' . h .""tria U. the Irk 04 n it. = k in tbell:ltuazar, 1 1 11?ter, t t ! . . l d W hi:l 6 . Zl: v QV no 4• , County ' d IS. ISA .■ Cul by ha be! thi - • Pa as IDE