The Express. — London, England, 1866-09-21 00:00:00

TSB ELECTION COMMISSIONS. REIGATE. ----- The inquiry was resumed yesterday. Frederick Juice, cross-eiuninned by Mr. Serjeant O'Brien—l am • grocer and tailor, and was concerned rather actively at the last election for Mr. Gower, for whom I vcite I received 201. altogether for my services. Altogether, for all p I received 1394 7s. 2d .- 1001. from Mr. Smith, and 381 . 2d. from Mr. Buckland. The looney from Backland I received at different times. The amount I received from Mr. Smith was all in cheques. I seat in to Mr. Smith an account of the moneys I spent in the election up to the first 401. That sum, with the 201. for myself, leaves 401. unaccounted for. The whole amount I expended was 1691. 7s. 2d., and I have only received 1391.75. 2d. I cannot tell how I only sent in an account to Mr. Smith for 401. Mr. Smith has not seen the whole account in which I have put down my services at 501. I signed • receipt for 501. when the ac. comets had to be made up. I made out the =count from slips of paper and from memory, and it would pule any bosky but myself to understand it. I believe I made out my first account so as to agree with 401. allowed in Mr. Smith's account spinet me. (The items of vitae's'. account IMO then alluded to seriatim, but nothing of importance was elicited.) I reckon there la 301. due to me still to make up the 501. I expect for my services, the same as has been paid to others who took an active part in the election. I expect to be paid some day. r voted in 1863. I voted for Mr. Wilkinson, sad m ceived 351. for my services. I was • sub-agent then, but cannot say how much money passed through m hands. I found some of that money. A puttees= aske d me if I was fond of gingerbreed—(laughter)--and when I said "Yes," he told me to go to the Swan and look on the mantelpiece, and I should find some. I went, and found a package containing 1001. That gentleman was Mr. James. The 35/. was independent of the gingerbread. I paid voters with the 1001. Cross-examined by Mr. Smith—l have paid attention to the evidence of witnesses, and have found that their state ments with reference to reeeiptafrom me in 1863 were gene rally c0n0ct..... . . * Mr. Serjeant O'Brien—The so-called employ ment of voters is entirely a colourable affair, and is well understood as such. I paid 101. to the two Dewdneys, the drapers, not to vote. My wife gave Apted 101. to pry the Dewdneysnot to vote. It was a close contest, and the majority was only 12. The 101. was never returned to me by James Apted. I had no communication with the Dewdneys myself, and from what I have heard in evidence from them I am inclined to think they never received the money. I gave Holdaworth 101. to give to Wooden, who voted for Mr. Wilkinson. Apted had 51. for Bentley, who voted for us. Apted further bad 51. for • man named Jackson. All that money came out of the 1001., and must have been given on the day of election. I gave Richard Turner, my next door neighbour, 5/. to go away. I had 111. left out of the 1001., and I returned it to Mr. James. Ido not think any one except myself knows that I had the 1001. from Mr. James, who is now dead. I worked for Wilkinson till he lost the ballot, and received at different elections 101., 201., 351., and on the last occasion 201. again. I was offered 401. Trueman, Doulton's agent, which I refused, as I °Po wdered Wilkinson lost the ballot unfairly. James Aptedareca ll ed, and examined by Mr. Serjeant O'Brien—l have no recollection of receiving 104 from Mr. Joyce on the day of election, in 1863, for the Dewdneys. My instructions were to get the Dewdneys at any price, and if I could not get them to vote, to prevent them voting. I was with them an bout and a ball at the back door, and we emptied eight bottles of grape wine. I kept them in tow till it struck four, and kept Puking the money in my pocket all the time. When it was too late to vote I jumped over the wall and left them. (Laughter.) The wine was Dawd nay's, and was rare wine. (Laughter.) I'll give you • ' straight tip about the elections. (Laughter.) I never re- oeived money for Bentley. Mr. Joyce Jackson him- ! self. Ile took him up to Ben F on's and took his shoes off, locked him up, and kept him there all night. That's a straight tip for you. (Laughter.) William Bundell, examined by Mr. Smith—l am a carman, and never paid nothing for my house but my rent. (Laughter.) Mr. Smith—And you pay yearly? Witness—No, I don't ; I pay quarterly. I was paid 15/. for the use of a room during the election. I keep • publio-house. I was also paid for refreshments. Mr. Smith paid me. My house is the Marquis of Grenhy, Redhill, near the station, well beknown, fir. (Laughter.) I voted for Mr. Cower in 1863 and 1865. I bad nothing in 1865, and what I have been speaking of was in 1863. Mr. Richard Laker, examined by the Chief Commis. sioner—! am an hotel proprietor, and keep the Railway Hotel, RedhilL At the last election I voted for Mr. Cower, and was also on his committee, taking an active part in the election, though I did not go much out of my own house. I never either received or paid • farthing. I canvassed a few people. There are live or six voters in my own yard, to whom I introduced Mr. Gower. They all went with me. Two of them were " put on ;" but I believe the others were not. When I canvassed them they said they would go the mine way I did. I received no money for electioc refresh ments. I supplied carriages on the nomination and poll ing days, and during the whole time of the election. I sent in my account for 421. 3s. 6d. to Mr. Smith after the ' election, and that was the only sum I was paid. In 1863 I voted for Mr. Wilkinson, and secured four of my own men then. I did net give them anything for their votes, nor did I get them employed. I also supplied carriages on the occasion. I believe Samuels received 5/. from Mr. Jamas on that occasion. My bill for carriages on that caw- Won amounted to about 901. ; and I also received 421. for the use of rooms during the election, and during the peti tion matter. The proceedings were then adjourned until to-day. LANCASTER. Thu inquiry inquiry was resumed yesterday. Thomas Dearden, of the Corporation Arms, said—l re ceived 6/. for my house, which was a " blue" (conservative) house, and I was also paid a bill of 17/. 18s. for refresh ments. Were you " blue" at Mr. Saunders's election?—No. I should have been, but don't you see I married a " yellow" wife. (Laughter.) Well, wouldn't she let you vote " blue?"—Oh, dear no. She said I must vote for Gregson, and of course I did. (Laughter.) Then how was it that you came to vote " blue" this time?—l've another wife now, and she told me to vote as I liked. (Laughter.. Is it customary for publicans wives' to command their husbands' votes ? — No, but if you had them to live with, you would be like to please 'em a bit. (Great laughter.) John Forrest, landlord of the Fat Soot, said his house was engaged at the election on behalf of the liberals, but he received nothing for it. Perhaps you had no vote?—No, I had not. Then that accounts for it. (Laughter.) J. A. Bibby, of the Bear and Staff, received 10/. for his house, and was paid 28/. for refrosluneuts; Win. Jackson, of theMals Shovel, received 101. and a bill of 421. • J. Parkin son, New Inn, 101. and • bill of 221. 106. ; William Lawson, Three Tuns, got 101. for his house and 10/. for his vote ; Henry Richmond, Commercial Inn, received 10/. and a bill of 271. ; William Butterworth, of the White Lion, received 101. and • bill of 11/. 17s. 6d.; T. Sanderson, King's Head, 10/. and a bill of 101. .A number of voters were next examined as to the sums they received for their votes. Anthony Hargreaves, master gardener, received 10/. for his vote from Mr. G. Clark. Got no drink, being • tem perance man. What rent do you pay ?-170/. a year. And you took 101. for your vote?—Yes. John Lawson, farmer, of Leach-house, Elle!, received 101. for his vote. He stated that he farms 100 acres, and paid 276/. for his farm. _ _ _ John Parker, farmer, received 5/. Paid 701. a year for his farm. Wm. Fox, farmer, Si. Fanned 150 acres, and paid a rental of 226/. a year. Joseph Fox, farmer, who farms 111 acres on a rental of 1401. a year, received 101. for his vote. The following voters were bribed through Mr. Cross, one of the conservative captains:—Thomas Binleu received 2J.; George Blizard, 71. ; William Cumpaty, 121.: Wm. Faw cett, 101. for vote, and U. 15s. for being upon the com mittee._ The Commissioners then proceeded with the list of voters bribed through Mr. Copeland, another of the con servative captains. William Hodgeon Bingham had 10/. for his vote. James Calvert had 131. for hie vote, and 3s. or 6.. in addition. The Chief Commissioner—What was that for ?—I was not very well at the time, and that wee to get nourishment with. (Laughter.) _ _ _ So yo'u go - Tlsi. for your vote, and se. or 6a because you war not well!—Yea - How clime you to get so much u 151. said I should like it. Hoy did you vote at the previous election ?—For Fannie& Oh, then, that accounts for it. (Laughter.) John Gardener said he received 81. for his vote and ss. on the nomination day. Was that because you were not very well ? (Laughter.) —No it was for my services. I was paid by Bartholomew Coupland handed in the voucher signed by Sharpies, which showed that be had received IW. to give Gardiner. The Chief Commis (inner (to witneu)—Then according to this Bartholomew Sharpies owes you 21. (Laughter.) Commissioner Newton—Yon bad better put him in the county court, and summon Mr. Coupland as • witness. (Laughter.) Thom& 'Harrison had 10/. for his vote and 21. for ear. vibes and expenses ; William Harrison, 101. for hit vote and 31. 10e. for services and expenses ; James Hanson, 141. for his vote and services ; William Harrison, 101. ; Edward Harrison, 10/. for his vole and 11. 15e. for service* on the committee ; John Hadwen Harrison, 101. for his vote, and 41. sa. in addition. Robert Sadiron, bad 151. for his vo t e , and U. for ex ponies, besides as much drink as ever be could get into (Inughtar.) I was • master carter, and made from 1/. to 5/. • day. John Hodgson, brother of last witn e s s , h a d 151. f or hi s wale, and 11. 10s. for expenses. • • f . THI ixI'liESS, FRIDAY EVE G; SEPTEMBER How came you to get 10a. more than your brother Oh, Robert lel out of town at the time, so he mimed it. (Laughter.) And you had as much drink as you could hold, too, I suppose? No • I'm temperance. Then you do the book department of the Arm? (Laughter.) No, I don't. floe. Marshall received 121. for his vote, and 11. for his expense, and had 14s. Gd. from the other side also. Maaluter had 51. paid by Thomas Garnett. Mr. Coupland produced the voucher showing that Garnett had received 81. on account of this witness's vote. Commissioner i4;;I:o; (to witness)—l'm afraid he has done you out of 32. When you catch him put him into the County Court. (Laughter.) William Maslnter had 5/. • John 'Miller 101. for his vote and 31. for expenses ; William Powell 10/. for his vote and 21. be. for services on the committee ; William Shaw 61. for his vote for Lawrence, and 30s. for his vote and ser- I vices for Fencrick ; Edward Smith 81. for his vote which he gave for Fermi& and Schneider, and 61. or 61. in addi tion before the election. He also had 30s. weekly for three weeks for being upon the liberal committee. Had • great deal of drink, in fact he was always drinking while the election was about. (Laughter.) Did you committee men do anything except drink ? Not much. (Laughter.) Now how much did you get from the conservative side ? —I got 12/.—(laughter)--and I also had 20s. from Law rence's committee, and perhaps about a pound more for drink. I meant to vote for Lawrence, and Mr. Coupland paid me before I voted, but I was brought round to Fen wick and Schneider in the end. (Laughter.) You were serving on both the liberal and conservative committees?—Yes. (Laughter.) How many other voters were serving on both sides ? Very nearly all the men I knew. The main part of them were drawing money from both aides. Then from liberals and conservatives together you got about 28/. , beeides eating and drinking ?—Nay, I had nowt to eat. (Laughter.) But you made up by drinking. At whose expense did yon drink ?—Both aides. (Laughter.) I wasn't particular. John Powell Swainson received 20/. for his vote . • Septi mus Hodgson received the same amount ; and Henry Wilson the same. They were all three butchers, and had agreed to go together, and to get 20/. each. Wilson also received 31. from the liberals for drink. TheloWury* -- --- wS;p;;;Sediei when our parcel was de spatched. Tilt RIVER MEDWAY. Yesterday afternoon an influential public meet ing of landowners and other inhabitants of West Kent was held at the Town-hall, Maidstone, to take into con sideration the propriety of adopting measures for stocking the river Medway with salmon and other fish, and for the general improvement of the river. The chair was occupied by the mayor of Maidstone (Mr. Lawrence), who had con vened the meeting, in compliance with the request of en association recently formed at Tunbridge. Amongst those present were Mr. Frank Buckland and Mr. J. W. Fennell, one of the government inspectors of fisheries. Mr. Frank Buckland said in that county they bad three good rivers—the Thames, the Medway, and the Stour; but they were at present comparatively useless, so far as the production of fish was concerned. He believed that no valid reason existed why this should continue to be the case, and that by adopting the proper means it was as easy to grow fish as it was to grow hops. The annual value of the salmon fisheries amounted in Scotland to 500,0001. ; in Ireland, to 300,0001. ; but in England, to 10,0001. only. The Medway, in consequence of its tribu taries, was well adapted for the cultivation of salmon ; and it was stated in ancient records that 1,300 salmon from the Medway were supplied to the monks at Roches ter. He was not yet fully acquainted with the river and all its sources ; he knew, however, that some of its tributaries were from 15 to 20 miles in length, and it was to these streams that the salmon would go to lay its eggs, if allowed to do so. There were a num ber of locks on the Medway, which would prevent the fish from going up the river, b ut this difficulty might be overcome ny the use of ladders, which had been proved by repeated experiments. Of course it would be impossible to breed salmon in polluted water, and the refuse of gas works and similar matter was partic ularlyl destructive. He presumed, however, that for the sake of their own health and that of their families, they wished to keep the river pure, and if that was done he felt confident that the object he advocated might soon be attained. Mr. Fennell referred to the commission appointed in 1860 to investi gate the subject of the salmon hsheries, and its subsequent labours, which had been attended with a large amount of success. In Derbyshire the produce of the salmon fish eries had increased tenfold. The Medway was not one of the rivers which Lad yet been officially considered with respect to the salmon fisheries ; but he felt much encouraged from what he had heard that morning from the man in charge of the lock near Maidstone, who said that within two months he bad caught two salmon, weighing about 12Ibs. each. The length of the Medway from its rise to the Nora was 69 miles ; and there were now many rivers in this country of not one-fourth the extent which produced abundance of good salmon. In that locality the.existenoe lof numerous paper mills was no doubt considered • great obstacle to the breedingof salmon in the river ; but the refuse which came from these mills ought not to be allowed to pollute the stream, and it was quite unnecessary that such should be the case, as by a small expenditure a reservoir might be constructed to receive the refuse, which could all be sold, to the advantage of the manufacturer. He should in theexercise of his duties as a public officer occupy several days in making a complete inspection of the Medway and its tributaries, so that he might be in a position at a future time to give more definite information, and be hoped in the prosecution of his work to receive the valuable assistance of Mr. Buckland. Other gentlemen supported the objects of the association, and the meeting was then adjourned to enable Mr. Fennell to inspect the river and its tributaries, and present a report on the whole subject. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. THE ST. GILES'S MURDER. After our report left yesterday the following evidence was adduced for the defence: _ Mr. G. C. Itarwell said he had known the prisoner two years and a half, and frequently saw him. Witness was • carpenter and joiner by trade, but he preached occasionally, and he had several conversations with the prisoner upon the subject of religion. The prisoner upon one occasion told him that he was a Jew by birth, and that he was of Jewish extraction. Sometimes he would talk rationally for a time, and then suddenly become incoherent and ab struse, and rise up from his seat and exclaim that he was • lout man, and he was sure to go to bell. Upon some ooca "ions the prisoner, in the middle of a serious conversation, would exclaim, " Harwell, you are • rum fellow." When he acted in this way witness observed • peculiar glistening of the eyes, and the prisoner appeared to be agitated all over his body. At other times the prisoner would burst into tears, and he frequently said how mise rable he was, and that he wished he was dead. The pri soner frequently brought the deceased child to his house, and he always appeared to be remarkably fond of him, and upon one occasion he offered witness 501. as a premium if he would take the child as an app rentice . He also told him that there was money in the f unds for the benefit of the child, and that he was determined to take care of it for him, end prevent his mother from getting hold of it. Cross-examined—Witnees used to preach in the open air, and the prisoner spoke to him upon one occasion after he had bean so engaged. When the prisoner said he was miserable, they had been talking about his wife, and witness was aware that she was living with another man. Mr. John Frazer, who described himself as a Gospel preacher, said he had known the prisoner five years, and he had visited the prisoner's wife and her mother upon some occasions. Ible had read the Bible and prayed with the grandmother, and he remembered that one day be told her that he was anxious to effect • reconciliation between her and the prisoner and his wife. The latter was present, and she said that she hated him and the grandmother said the same, and added that she would hunt him to death. Upon one occasion while the prisoner was in his room, he suddenly seized the ppooker and bran dished it about, and was very violent, excisiming "There they go, there they go, " and witness had him watched for nearly a day. He c ould not say that the prisoner was drunk at this time, and he did not look like a drunken man when he came into his room. He always oonaidered the prisoner was not right in his mind, and he appeared espe cially excited when the subject of his wife having had a child was mentioned. He had heard from the wife that she had this child when she was only fourteen years and three months old, sad that it was in the Foundling Hospital. Cross-examined—Witness had never seen any pence under the influence of delirium tremens, and be was unable to say whether the prisoner was suffering from that malady when he brandished the poker. He would not say that the prisoner had not been drinking at the time, but he walked like a sober man. Mr. Daly having summed up the cue for the prisoner, Mr. Poland briefly replied, and in the course of his observations he said it appeared to him that if the defence of insanity were allowed to prevail in the present use, no eharge of murder could ever be made against any man in which the same defence might not be set up. A man might aot foolishly ; he might be under delu sions, arising from the effects of drink, but this was no answer to such a charge as the present, and before the jury would be justified in acquitting the prisoner on the ground of insanity, they must be satisfied that at the time the act was committed the prisoner was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong, or not aware of what he was doing. Mr. Justice Wiles then proceeded to sum up, observing that he thought the jury would not entertain any doubt that a murder bad, in point of fact, been committed, and the only question for them to answer was, whether it was established bT the evidence that the prisoner's was the hand by which that murder had been committed. He then referred to all the material points in the ease, and said that the defence of the prisoner appeared to rest upon the assumption that at the time the offence was committed he was of unsound mind and on that f round was not re sponsible. The learned judge then explained the laws upon this subject, and concluded by leaving the case in the hands of the jury. The jury commenced their deliberations at five minutes past six o'clock, and in ten minutes they found • verdict of Guilty. Mr. Justice Willes at once assumed the black cap, and, addressing the prisoner, said he bad been convicted upon evidence that had satisfied the jury, and which undoubt edly satisfied his own mind, of the murder of his son, Arthur Richard Jeffery. It was needless to dwell upon the circumstances under which the crime was committed, but they were undoubtedly circumstances of great bruta lity. The only hope that could have existed for him as • defence was the question that had been raised by his counsel whether he was in such a state of mind as to be responsible for his actions, and the jury were of opinion that there was not sufficient evidence to support that suggestion, and he en tirely concurred with them in that opinion. There could be no doubt that he had allowed a feeling of jealousy to prey upon his mind, and that under the influence of that feeling he had committed the dreadful crime of which he had been found guilty. The learned judge then exhorted the prisoner to prepare for the fate which, he said, inevi tably awaited him, and concluded by passing sentence of death in the usual form. The prisoner, when the sentence was pronounced, beste d to be allowed to say a few words, and he then turned the jury, and said is • clear, calm tone, " I declare as I stand here before God that I did not know what I was about when I did it. I admit that I have had a fair trial, and I thank you, my lord and the jury. lam guilty. " The prisoner was then removed. NEW COURT. (Before Mr. Justice Lush.) Emily Bradbury, a decently-attired woman, with an infant in her arms, surrendered in discharge of her bail, to answer an indictment charging her with the manslaughter of Jane Edwards on the 3rd of August last. She was also charged on the coroner's inquisition. Mr. R. N. Philiips conducted the prosecution ; and Mr. Montagu Williams (instructed by Mr. Ricketts) defended. The evidence on the part of the prosecution disclosed that the deceased was a married woman, and resided with her family at No. 38, Langford-road, Camden-town ; and the prisoner, also a married woman, lodged at her house. On the day in question the clothes belonging to both were hanging up to dry on the lines in the yard, and a quarrel ensued in consequence, as is alleged, of the prisoner pall ing down two counterpanes belonging to the deceased, and throwing them to the ground, by which they were considerably soiled. The deceased expostulated with the prisoner, who instantly took down the clothes prop suppoKing the line, and aiming it lance-like, she thrust, or " jammed" (as the witnesses de scribed it) the sharp, or forked end into the left eye of the deceased with great violence, the result being that the deceased fell to the ground insensible. She was ultimately removed to the hospital, where after lingering some times he died from the effects of the injuries she had sustained. The evidence of Mr. H. S. Shaw, the house surgeon of the hospital, established the fact that death had ensued from tetanus, or lock-jaw, produced by the injury inflicted upon the eye, end further, that on a post-mortem examination of the body, be discovered in the region of the eye, an ulcer which on being opened was found to contain several splints of wood ? one of them three-quarters of an inch long. Those splints he had found to correspond with the sharp end of the clothes prop which he had examined. Mr. M. Williams addressed an eloquent appeal to the jury on behalf of the prisoner, but called no witnesses. The jury, after some consultation, returned a verdict of Guilty, accompanied with a strong recommendation to _ _ Mr: Justice Lush deferred passing sentence, and the prisoner was removed from the bar. At the rising of the court the prisoner was brought up for judgment, when Mr. Justice Lush, addressing her, said that be had taken time to consider her case with a view to ascertain what sentence be ought to pronounce. He entirely concurred with the verdict which the jury had pronounced, and he should give effect to their recommendation. But for that recommendation the sentence would have been made more severe ; as it was the sentence was that she be imprisoned with hard labour for three calendar months. Barbara Brown, a forbidding-looking young woman, was indicted for throwing a quantity of oil of vitriol at Frederick Waddell, with intent to burn or disfigure him, or to do him grievous bodily harm. Mr. R. P. Wood prosecuted. The evidence established the facts that the prosecutor, who is barman at the Duke of York tavern, York-road, Lambeth, had cohabited with the prisoner for two years, but had separated from her in consequence of her drunken habits. About 8 o'clock on the evening of the 11th September instant she entered the tavern, and deliberately threw the contents of a cup she brought with her in the direction of his face, but by accidentally turning his head the liquid missed his face, but fell on his vest and shirt, which were burned and stained. It was proved that the prisoner had purchased the vitriol half an hour before the occurrence, and when taken into custody seemed to rejoice in the act, stating that she would do it again if she had the opportunity. The jury found her Guilty on the minor count of the indictment, and she was sentenced to 18 months' impri sonment with hard labour. On the amlication of Mr. F. H. Lewis, the trial of Ed ward Gran Mid, the late manager of the Leeds Banking Company, for fraud, was again postponed by Mr. Justic e Lash to the next sessions, the learned judge declining to Ex • day when it should come on. Thomas Crippe, a labourer, was indicted for ravishing and carnally knowing Martha Ann Herbert, a young girl 14 years of age, at Hatton, near Bedfont. Mr. Collins, instructed by Messrs. Sheen and Roscoe, on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Women and Children, prosecuted, and Mr. Pater defended the prisoner. After a long inquiry, The jury found the prisoner Guilty of an assault with intent to commit a rape, and Mr. Justice Lush sentenced him to 18 months' impri sonment with bard labour. THIRD DOUBT. (Before Xr. Thomas Chambers, Q.C., Common Serjeant.) Edward Eheen was indicted for feloniously assaulting Robert Simone, with intent to do grievous bodily harm. The indictment had been found at the July seastone, but had been adjourned, in consequence of the inability of the prosecutor to attend as a witness, by reason of the injury he bad snotained. _ _ . The prisonerTal in the meantime been admitted to bail, and now surrendered to take hie trial. _ _ . Mr. Begley (instructed by Mr. Pook) appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Cooper defended the prisoner. The prosecutor was foreman in the service of Messrs. Wilkie and Soames, soap manufacturers at East Green wich, and the prisoner was a labourer employed by that firm. One day in the month of July last the prisoner was told by the prosecutor to do certain work, which he seemed disinclined to perform, on which the prosecutor told him that if he would not work he had better leave the service, on which the prisoner replied that he would do so, and asked where he could get his money. The prosecutor re plied, he could receive it where be had always been paid. The prisonerthen went out of the workshop, but returned in • few minutes, and seizing the prosecutor, him from the desk stool at which he was sitting at his duties, and threw him violently on the ground, the result being that his leg was fractured by the fall, and from the fracture he had not reeovered, but, on the contrary, he now ap peared before the court on crutches. Mr. Cooper interposed, and said that his client had ex pressed deep contrition for what had happened, and would pleadty to the count in the indictment for unlawfully woun That p ea having been recorded, The Oommon Serjeant sentenced the prisoner to three months' imprisonment with hard labour. Ann Lander, 29, married, and Charles Fudge, were in dicted for a robbery with violence on Thomas Caper, and stealing fromPLis person 11/., his monies. Mr. Cooper (instructed by Mr. Croker, from the office of Mr. Few) appeared for the prosecution ; and Mr. Montagu Williams defended the male prisoner. The prosecutor is a cabinet maker, living in Bethnal green, and on the night of the 14th August was crossing Finsbury awe, on his way home, when the female pri soner accosted him and asked him for sixpence. He put his hand into his pocket to comply with the request, when • man suddenly seized him from behind by the throat and pressed him so tightly that he could not speak, the female prisoner taking the whole of his money out of his pocket. The man (not the prisoner) then tripped him and be fell heavily on theground, but on reooverinir himself he followed and by the aid of a constable succeeded in taking the female prisoner and • man (who died the same night at the polioe station) into custody. Mr. M. Williams submitted that there was no case against Fudge. The Common Serjeant COIMUTtId, and directed his ac quittal. The jury found the female prisoner Lander Guilty, and she wassentenced to be kept in penal servitude for the term of seven years. THE POLICE COURTS. GUILDHALL Maria Mayhew, residing at No. 2, Vernon-place, Bloomsbury, surrendered in discharge of his recognisance' on the charge of having committed perjury in an affidavit before the deputy-registrar of the Lord Mayor's court. Be was further charged not only with having committed per jury, but also with forgery and impersonation. Evidence in support of both cases was taken, and the prisoner was further remanded. THE EXTRAORDINARY IMPUTATIONS UPON A MEDICAL MAN. Mr. James Part, on being sworn at the inquest yester day, said—l am a member of the Royal College of Surgeons, and a graduate of medicine at St. An drew's. I reside at 89, Camden-road. I was called to see the deceased, Mr. Golding, on the 26th De cember, by Miss Southgate. I was told he was ill, but that he also wished to see me on other business. That was in the morning. I went to see him about three o'clock, and when I went into the room where deceased was we were alone, and on the door being closed, Mr. Golding said " Phave sent for you to be my executor. lam very ill, and feel that I have not long to live. I went out some ten or twelve days ago, and got my clothes wet. I have a bad cough, and my breathing is very troublesome. I have become so much weaker these last few days that I cannot get up and down stairs." I desired him to take off his coat and waistcoat, and examined his chest. There was both large and small mucous bronchi, with difficult respiration. His pulse was at 100, and healthy, but his expectoration copious. His countenance was dusky. He was in the second floor of the house, which was i exceedingly dirty and cold, and there was scarcely a handful of fire n the grate. I considered, looking at his age, that he was beyond all human aid ' • but I prescribed for him. Dr. Part here read his prescription from his day book. The rills were composed off of a grain of ipe cacuanba, 4of a grain of squills, of a grain of sulphate of zinc, and 2 grains of extract of henbane. These were to pro- duce expectoration. Dr. Partalso read the prescription foe the liquid medicine he had given to his assistant to be made up for the deceased. He read it in Latin, and translated it into English, for the information of the jury thus : "Solution of acetate of ammonia, 2 oz. ; oxymel of squills, 2 drachms ; compound tincture of camphor, 2 drachius ; aniseed water, b oz. A sixth part every four hours." By Mr. Beard—He told me he wanted to make his will, and I said, "You had better have • solicitor to do so." Mr. Golding said, " No, you can take the instructions and do it." He said, " You get some paper, and I will dictate it to you." I got some paper, and he then said, " I leave Ito Frances Southgate 1001., and Frances Southgate, jun., IDOL" He then said, " I give you all my prints and proofs, and I leave you my residuary legatee, and appoint you my sole executor. Yon will find in my house 2J01., or thereabouts, in gold and silver, 901. in notes, and stind• ing in my name in Three per Cent. Consols, 1,200/." I then said, " Have you any relations, Mr. Golding ?" He replied, " I have some, but I have not seen them for many years, and I don't care for them. In fact, I had thou3ht of leaving my money to a friend, an artist, but there are circumstances in his family that make me think it will soon be squandered away, and I have resolved to leave it to you." I said, " Have you any other wishes ?" to which he replied, " I should like you to give the landlady the furniture or 101. in money, which you please." I said, " I suppose you wish to give the Southgate' their legacies free of duty?" He replied , " Well, no ; I have been thinking of that, and if you do, your share will not be a thousand pounds, what I intend it should." He said, " You had better describe me of 45, Upper Seymour street, for I resided there when I bought that stock in." I sent him a bottle of wine and some boiled turkey, and Mrs. Part made him some beef tea. The day I first saw him he said, " There is a 501. note in the drawer, and you may as well take that with you." When I left, the first thing I did was to go and try to find a nurse who lived in the same street as be did, but she was out. I then called upon Mr. Wehnert's brother, and I asked him to tell his brother to come that evening as I wanted him to make deceased's will. It told Mr. Wehnert to make the will quickly, se I did not think the gentleman would live. He appointed one o'clock next day, and Mr. Wehnert and Captain Brookes went with me to Mr. Golding, and I introduced them. I went out and got some ink, and on my return I saw the will executed. On receiving the will from Mr. Wehnert, Mr. Golding rose up from his chair, and handing it to me said, " I give this to your charge," and turning to the solicitor he said, " Now, sir, what is your compliment ?" I said, " Never mind that, Mr. Golding, I will settle that." I pre scribed for him after that. When I saw the dirty state of the place on my first visit, I directed it to be cleaned and a fire lighted, and the place warmed. I left him on the afternoon he signed the will, about half-put three. I gave him some sherry and water. I never showed Miss Southgate a paper or papers on the day I went there, or told her, so far as I recolleet, that on the death of her mother t he whole would come to her. On the follow. ing day (Thursday) so soon as I heard deceased was worse —that was about ten o'clock—l went directly, and when my carriage came to the door I requested m wife to follow me. When I went he was sensible, and I did not find him at all convulsed. I left about half-past twelve. I went into the sitting-room, and saw • drawer open, and Miss Southgate was there. Thislwu the drawer from which Mr. Golding had taken the &W. to give me on the previous day, and I saws sovereign loose in the drawer, and some of the bags with money gone. Miss Southgate left deceased's room a second time, and when I went in I missed the sovereign, and told Miss Southgate that I had missed it, and she said, " Oh, I have got that," and she gave it up. It is perfectly untrue that I ransacked the place while the deceased was dying. It is also untrue that I ever took any watches away. N% hat I took was in the evening after the death of Mr. Golding. After his death, when I returned, I said to Mile Southgate, "I must request you to remain in the house till we have searched the place. You have aroused some very disagreeable impressions in my mind, and I cannot allow you to go till we have found all the money." That night we found 001. The next morning we found an old-fashioned leaden inkstand, and • box in which there were 30 sovereigns rolled up. That made altogether 901 found in the house. Mr. Beard—Now a great deal has been said about the hurried manner in which you got rid of the body. Tell us what took place. Witnees—l asked the deceased if he had any request to make about his body. He said, " No," that I might take it to the dissecting-room if I liked. After some other de tailed statements oontradictory to what had been stated as to witness's refusing the body to be seen, he stated that he had been in practice 36 years, and had been surgeon to the Artists' Benevolent Fund 20 Tears. By the Coroner—l cannot in any way account for arsenic being found. I wrote the prescription and left my moistent to make it up. By Mr. Winckworth—Tbe deceased's complaint was bronchitis. I know Mr. Cameron. He is a solicitor. He was never m solicitor. Miss Southgate never told me that Mr. Gol y ding was her friend. I never told any one that the deceased was a peer man: 901. 3s. was the aggre gate amount that I found in the house. I knew Mr. Tay lor, of Agar-town. I believe he was drowned at Southend. I attended him formerly. I discharged his account oe condition that I should have his prints when he died. They are a Tiny fine collection. I cannot swear that I did 1866. sot say that the whole would go to Mies Southgate at her mother's death. _ .. idWtitlßriertion, examined by Mr. Beard—l reside at Tetherington Vicarage, in Gloucestenhire. I was an assistant to Dr. Part in December last. I remember making up the prescription strictly and correctly. By the Coroner—l made up the mixture, but the pills were kept made up in stock. By Mr. Winkworth.—l have never seen the book of pre. scriptious since I left Dr. Part's. _ . Captain Edward Wolf frooksr deposed—l reside at 66, Pa ull-street, Kentish-town. lam son-in-law of Dr. Part. I was on a visit at Dr. Part's hone' in December last. I remember going with the doctor to the house of the deceased. He told me he wanted me to attest the will. Mr. Wehnert, the solicitor, was present. The doctor left the room to get some ink, and then the will was read to the deceased, who remarked that it was exactly 'what he wanted. [The will of the deceased was handed in and read by the witness.; Examination continued—The deceased was . perfectly sensible when the will was read. I know nothing about the residuary property left to Dr. Part. I was there on the Wednesday. I was alio there the next day about half. put 2 o'clock. I went there because I knew that Mrs. Part was alone. The deceased appeared to me to breathe with great difficulty. Mies Southgate was in the room some part of the time. I did not ask her if she knew Golding's handwriting. I did not ask her if be was capable of menacing his own a ff airs. After the attestation of the will, it was handed to Dr. Part, with the words, "You take this and keep it." Miss Southgate was not in the room when the will wee read over. Caroline Part deposed—l am the wife of James Part, of Camden-road. I remember on the 28th December last going to the house of the deceased. I went because no one else was there. I saw the deceased upon arriving. Dr. Part and Mrs. and Miss Southgate were there. My son Jamas came soon after I got there. He brought some sandwiches with him at my request. Directly the doctor left Mrs. South gate suggested that Miss Southgate should go home, bat I told her if she did the old gentleman might die tither absence. He died about 3 o'clock in the presence of Mrs. and Misa South gate, my son, and myself. Mrs. Southgate said she was very glad I was there, as she could not touch a °° When the man died I seat down to Mrs. Todd, the landlady e of the house, to assist me in laying hint out,but she said she could not touch a dead body. I then suggested that they should send for the charwoman, but they said she would not touch a dead body any more than they would. I waited there for my husband, who said that his sons would lay him out. I never told Miss or Mrs. Southgate that they might go home. I never told them that they should not hear the will read. I observed a great deal of whis pering going on between Mrs. and Miss Southgate. They did not leave the house till the evening on the day Mr. Golding died. lam quite Bare that I never spoke to Mrs. Southgate. I took the part I did solely out of philan thropy because no one could be found to do it. By the Coroner—l never attended any one in this way before. Thomas Vincent Part deposed—l am the son of Dr. Part. I assist my father in his profession. I took some turkey and medicine to the house of Mr. Golding on the night before he died. I went upstairs and knocked at his door, but the deceased would not let me in, and I left the things outside the door. On the day after the death I went to the house, and assisted my brother to put on a clean shirt, and subsequent) I assisted to put him in the coffin. My mother augges that she should go out of the room, and that the trousers of the deceased should be taken off, but I and my brother did not think it necessary. There were numerous persons in the house, and as there were no friends of the deceased we thought it advisable to have the coffin screwed down. The foreman of the jury said It appears to me strange, gentlemen, that she son of a doctor should go to the house of his father's patient to lay out a dead body. Witness—l went there to assist my mother to lay out a dead body. Foreman—You were aware, I suppose, that your mother went to lay out the body Witness—My mother did not go to lay out the body. Then what made you go?—I went out to see my mother. Juryman—Do you always Fo where your mother goes? The Coroner—l think this is really unfair. I think the fact of their father having been made the executor of the deceased, and he having left them a fortune, it is very reasonable to suppose that they would take an unusual interest in their father's patient. James Part deposed that he was the second son of Dr. Part. He went to the house on the day the deceased died, and was there an hour and a half before Mr. Golding died. Witness then went on to corroborate in detail pre vious evidence as to the sending for some person to lay the body out. By Mr. Winckworth—l swear that Mrs. Todd was asked to assist to lay the dead body out. Mr. Booth, the undertaker, examined by Mr. Winck worth—He deposed that the funeral was highly respec table. He did not remember ever burying any one with his trousers on. He did not conceive that there was any slur in burying a man with his trousers on. The foreman of the jury said there was a great discre pancy between the evidence of Mr. Part and that of MIL Pat. Mr. Beard here wished to call Mr. G. W. Rose, the super intendent of the Highgate Cemetery, to prove that the funeral was a highly respectable one, and that the de ceased was buried in a private grave, but the evidence was deemed by the jury unnecessary. There being no further witnesses on either aide, The Coroner, in summing up the evidence, wished, in the first place, to explain that a misapprehension had occurred in stating that he had ordered the exhumation of the body by direction of the Secretary of State. He had full power to order the exhumation of a body on his own account, but as the magistrates would not allow the coroner their expenses in such cases, he had applied to the Secretary of State on that point only. The Secretary of State said he could not interfere, and therefore, seeing the importance of this investigation, be had felt it his duty to order these proceedings at his own expense. He should consider himself incompetent to discharge the duties per twining to the office of coroner unless he had done so, after the letter he had received containing the allegations of neglect against Dr. Part. So far as the charge of neglect was concerned, he thought the jury must see that it was not made out. Then came that which was without doubt a singular feature, that the medical evidence showed that although there was no evidence of strychnine or any poison calculated to produce convulsions, still there were slight traces of morphia and arsenic, but in neither clue were such traces sufficient to produce death. Wite to the will, no doubt the accusers were actuated tr d feel. ings of jealousy. The room having been cleared, the jury proceeded to consider, and after about three quarters of an hour, the court being reopened, the following verdict was recorded : " That on the 2th day of December, 1865, Richard Gold ing was found dying, and did die, at 17, Stebbington-street, in the parish of St. Pancras, from the mortal effects of bron chitis; and the said jurors further say that, although a small quantity of arsenic and morphia were found in the stomach of deceased, the said death arose from natural causes." Applause followed the announcement of the verdict, and the proceedings closed. STRANGE SCENE AT WAILIFTELD.—On Wednes day afternoon the Old Market Cross at Wakefield was offered for sale by public auction. A large crowd col lected, and the proceedings were of a very disorderly character. Sometime ago the shopkeepers in Crose-equare, at the entrance to which the old cross stood, memo- rialised the town council, as the local board of health, to remove it, and, after a warm discussion, it was re solved to comply with the request, although the ratepayer were nearly al l in favour of its remaining. On Wed nesday, after Mr. C. Dixon, who officiated as auctioneer, had read the advertisement for the sale, Mr. Councillor Burton, who strongly opposed the removal of the old relic, asked the auctioneer who had authorised him to sell. Mr. Dixon replied that he bad received his instructions from Mr. Whitham, the town clerk. As Mr. Whitham was not present, Mr. Burton then asked the deputy town clerk (Mr. H. Morgan), who authorised Mr. 'Whitham to instruct Mr. Dixon to sell. The deputy town-clerk de clined to answer the question. Mr. Burton then proceeded to say that the sale was illegal, and addressed the crowd, who hurrahed and cheered most vociferously. At the conclusion of his remarks, the auctioneer, who war mounted upon a soap box at the Cross was about to address the crowd, but Mr. Burton called for a show of hands on the subject. On asking whether the crowd were in favour of the building remaining or for its removal, nearly every hand was held up for it to remain, there being only about half a damn amongst the large crowd who held up their hands for its removal. Owing to the very disorderly nature of the proceeding however, it was impossible for the crowd to have heard s, what Mr. Burton had said. Notwithstanding this manifestation on the part of the public, the conditions of sale were pi °duped by Mr. Beil, clerk to Mr. Whitham. He proceeded to read them, but immediately yelling, booli..g, and other discordant noises were made, and before he had concluded he was pushed off his po st, the auctioneer being also dismounted. They regained their position, and Mr. Dixon was about to address the crowd, but found it impossible to do so, and therefore asked for bids, his appeal being received with booting, &o. Mr. Burton hoped that not a shilling would be bid, and said that he offered 300/. for the place on the previous Monday, and it was refused. The auctioneer said the place must be sold, and, after much perseverance, he obtained a bid of 201., which was increased by U. bids until 35/. was offered by Mr. Thomas Armitage, of street, to whom it was knocked down. The lead was sold to Mr. Craven, plumber, 'Westgate, for 19e. 6d. per cwt. The mayor, the vicar, and nearly the whole of the mem bers of the council, and many of the principal inhabitants of the town were present. The Cross is to be removed at once, and it is stated by those who have advocated its clearance that it will be a great public improvement. Prior to the sale the bell on the top of the Cross, which has remained silent for a great number of years, was tolled, which was probably a means of bringing a large crowd.—Leeds Mercury. - ALEXANDRA PALACE AND Pisa.—The structure now in tonne of erection on the very top of Mnewell-hill is fast approaching completion, the contractors, Vern. Kelk and Lucas, having 1,200 men engaged upon it. The works were commenced in September, 1865, and have been carried on with unabated energy. The Great Northern Akenpany have already purchased the Edgware and High gate Railway, by means of which they will obtain • second line to the palace. THE LONDON, CHATHAM, AND DOVER RAILWAY. Yesterday, at the Sheriff's Court, Red Lion square, before Mr. rnder-Sheriff William Burchell and a jury, the case, " The Rev. Francis T. Blackburne and others v. The London, Chatham, and Dover Railway," was heard, and created considerable interest. It was a pro ceeding by wof elegit in the Common Pleas, on a judg ment for 9,00 0(., to obtain • charge on the surplus pro perty of the company advertised for sale. Mr. Lanyon was counsel for the plaintiffs, and Mr. Bridge appeared for Mr. Johnson, the secretary, and Mr. Forbes, the General Manager of the Company, who had been appointed Receivers by the Court of Chancey Mr. Lanyon proceeded, in his address to the jury, to explain the nature of the proceedings, and that their duty wasto find what surplus property the company had in Mid. diesel:, which might be made available for his clients. Mr. Bridge wished to inform the court that he appeared for the Receivers of the Company appointed by the Court of Chancery, and by an order which he would read, the Sheriff of Middlesex had been restrained from all interfer ewe with respect to the property of the company. The learned counsel read the order. Mr. Lanyon objected to his learned friend appearing in the matter, as the Receivers were not parties before the court, but only the company. A discussion took plans on this point, and it was ulti mately ruled that Mr. Bridge had no locus standi. Mr. Robert Vigers was called—He was with his brother, Francis Vigers, surveyor and auctioneer to the company. They had received instructions from the solicitors to sell certain surplus property, and advertised the same on the 23rd of August last. He did not know of any other surplus land but the property at Pimlico advertised to be sold. Mr. William It. Johnson stated that he was secretary to the London, Chatham, and Dover Company, and also one of the receivers appointed by the Court of Chancery. He knew of the advertisement which appeared on the 23rd of August, but was not consulted upon it. He did not know of any other surplus land in Middlesex, nor of any mort gage or charge upon it. Mr. James Forbes said he was the general manager, and also the other receiver appointed by the Court of Chancery. He knew what land was in use, and did not know of any other surplus land in Middlesex save the property described in the advertisement. There was other property, surplus, in Surrey and Rent. Mr. Forbes said he did not know whether the surplus property was mortgaged. Mr. Vigers was recalled and was questioned in reference to the property advertised in High-street, Pimlico. He de clined to state the value of a plot. On being told, however, that his refusal to give the in font ation required would lead to his committal for con tempt of court, he said the value of the plot of freehold ground was 2001. Some freehold residences he described and the land of the site of St. Michael's school was of itself worth 3,000/., and 7,000/. was the value of the land on which Trollope's yard stood. Mr. Viers asked whether he was to go on. Only 0,0001. was required by the writ, and he had already given evidence of property worth more than 11,000'. Mr. Lanyon required further evidence of the value of the property. Mr. Vigers gave the value of the property-2,0001. one house, another was let at 1201. a year, and the leasehold interest in several others he estimated at 3,000/. . . MT. lAnyon submitted that he had estiefactorily proved that the property he bad described vested in the company. Mr. Under-Sheriff Burchell told the jury it was for them to say whether they were satisfied with the evidence. The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the evi dence as to the value of the property in question. Mr. Bridge asked the court whether the property would he handed over to the plaintiffs, as he was ready to show that it vested in the receivers of the Court of Chancery. Mr. Under Sheriff Burchell must decline to answer the question. The parties could lodge a notice, if they thought proper, at the office of the Sheriff. The case of the Rev. Daniel O'Elough w. the London, Chatham, and Dover Railway, was then taken. It was on another writ of elegit, by the plaintiff, the Rev. Daniel Oliver Elough, on a judgment deed of 2,097/. 4a. 4d., ob tained in the Common Pleas. Mr. Tindal Atkinson, jun., for the plaintiff, that the evidence given ID the former ease should rtd . ported into the present action. The suggestion of the learned conned wee acted upon, and the jury returned &similar verdict, which was entered on the proceedings. - MARKETS. TALLOW.—TnniumaT Ewmano.— Th e quiet to-day, at the following prices :--tim tit i x 74 4 7 4, old, 455. ; October to Decemb er , 45 5. ; i 7 COTrON.—Lreeasoot, Sarr. 2o .--Idaticat • la favour of buyers The sales today ara lo ,2ll including 3,000 speculation and elport. 2,000,9 200 tian, 11d. t o 12d. t o Mid. • 100 Pasant, 15d. t o m ornit h ain , 10 ,i t r . p to lfal. ; Music and to 14d. ; aid. • 300 to 9d. ; 7,100 Burst, Sid. t o 114 d. ; e id. *0 Bengal, &Undo, kc., W. to lid. ; Chlna, 9id. te. WOOL AND WORSTED.—Basnrom, -15 1 stronger tone of the Liverpool cotton market duri ng % last few days, and the improvement to _some extent weather, have tended to impart more onserr site lh wool market, without, however, causing ea, wei „... th , Some transactions have taken place today for le - Wat sonsumption. There is an antra 1 411006 Oi Spinners look forward to a revival of business see h e . and are supplying themselves to some extent with 64 sorts of wcoL Prices, though rather firmer thee he week, are still unsteady. The news from Leipa e tw e not promising for the worsted yarn kind, th e a as the fa ir oommenoed on . Monday, it is too soon to - f . ; an opinion se to the ultimate result. Under the 4 1, eumatances, the foreigm houses are not ph e w ' but content themselves with watching th e of the fair. The demand for ho n e serfs average character, and so far is decidedly the beet the trade. In pieces merchants generally mem to tan a better opinion as to prospects in the Ms* future, and are disposed to make offers to trembistim ‘ though certainly at very low rates. A few onion hee been given out for the ensuing Beams. Emilie*. are busily engaged in banging out their novelties he h i spring, but as the present i o ret "between meow there it little doing in fancy sat present. The* rican houses are not as ye t deposed to place matena All are apparently waiting to see the lowest point row e l before operating, and that time is not far distant. Th e is a steady business doing for France. There is hil l doing for the East. Prices are unchanged. LACE AND HOSlEUY.—Norrnromue, L. X, There an at last some indications of an isprommon the lace trade, but we fear they will be aninteeseled b some extent by the upward tendency of yams. The day for home consumption hes been quiet as usual, bet m es have been a few more inquiries from Lauda kr* and one or two buyers have been down is !lee small sorting-up orders. Thaw are likewise • few as es demands from Italy and Germany, but business is b e s direction will be to a limited extent for some tins, ffis war having interfered with trade the greater put of lee summer stocks are still on hand. In the hosiery mel s there is no cause to complain, a great many beads U R kept remuneratively employed. There is a .lithe ba y off here and there in shipping orders, but ca Ike eXes hand we can hear of orders being refused,_ ewe % %g em , willingness of manufacturen to commit themsel ves ss sap extent beforehand at the present rate of prima COW and yarns have gone up during the last few days, a m i there are indications that the advance will be asioelosi —Nottingham Journal. CORN.-13tanrwonar, Sen. 20.—At this day's mum there was a fair supply of English wheat, whia way rather over last week's rates. Barley ls. to te. per gawk dearer. Oats advanced 6d. to la. per quarter. Ilms tending upwards. Peas L. per quarter higher. Dewienu. Bzrr. 20.—We had an increased sipik d wheat to-day, and a very large attendance of bed and dealers. The trade, however, was slow, amps h i dry samples, which made la. • qr. more money the kg week, but this rise was scarcely maintained at Maas. and a considerable proportion was left unsold. Of iukg there were not more than about half a dozen aught market. Oats, beans, peas, and other descriptions dles. ten corn, as last week. Beet white wheat, 29 a to le.; beet red, ditto, 28s. to 30s. ; new, 275.; ether sew, 225. to 285.; barley, 40s. to 425.; oats, tea to 32e.; hum, Mc to 26e. ; peas, 19a. to 21e. ; vetches, 225. to 2k fd.; rye, 16a. to 17a. ; fine flour, 41a. to 435. ; best musk 395. to 40s. loistircttrarnt, SEPT. 20.—Our market this morn* v. fairly attended. There was leas disposition :o *is of late ; good qualities of wheat sod flour, nevisies, brought fully the rates of this day se'nnight in tks made. Oats were 2d. per 451 b., and oatmeal ls. pa kid dearer. English beans were in very short supply, admit be called le. per quarter higher ; in foreign the. ms as change. Indian corn was without alteration. NrwAitz, Sir. 19.—Wheat Iran in tolerate wapciy, and with a steady trade recent rates were readily ism Wished. Barley supported its extreme raisa thin articles were about the same as last week. NSWBURT, SEPT. 20.—Our market was well swat with wheat this day, the trade slow, at last wears min Barley inferior and very scarce, sold re►dily at as arms of 2s. per quarter upon former quotations. Ws and bur steady, at late rates. EDO/BURGE, sset. 19.—As compared with lot Lod wheat was 2e. up on top, and IL sd. down on amp Barley was earns on top, and 83. up on average. Omit were Is. down on top, and Id. up on average. Beat woo 6d. up on top, and sa. 3d. up on average. Wheat, 434. W 60s. ; barley, 265. to 415.; oats, 25e. to 33a; beau, 55t. CATTLE.—RIZIIINGHAM, SEPT. 20.—We were but we dierately supplied with beasts this day. The trade ti fair, at late quotations. Sheep a limited supply. Trade heavy. Late prioes barely made. Calves a short supply. Fat pigs a moderate number on offer. Beef, 71 to sta. ; mutton, Bd. to 9d. • veal, Bid. to Bid. per lb. ; bass pigs, 10a. to 10s. 9d. per soore ; porket ditto, Ht. 6i to lls. --- Norrnmagge, Burr. 19.—We had rather a better gag of beef in the market to-day than there was on the pm vicar week, prices being from 9s. 6d. to 9s. 9d. forbid quality, and for not so good,Bs. to 95.3 d. was given. Tlies was a very good show of mutton at 80. to 9d. per lb. for first-class qualit and 41. to 80. was realised fa second ditto. Veal was very scarce and sold el about 91b per lb. Lamb, of which there was a good supply, maintained prices at from 9d. to Porket pigs were selling at 7s. 9d. to 8a per stone, and bacon pigs realised from 7s. 11. to 7s, OIL EDINBURGH, Barr. 19.—The number of cattle this mom lag was larger than on this day se'nuight, there bsiag 11, or an increase of 114 head. Sales were dull, but Megrim of last week were maintained. Current price, 91. as. 10..; middling and inferior, 7s. 6,1. to 9s. per dons. BP supply of sheep and lambs was large, the mambos beisg 6,274, or 392 more than last week. On account al tk• large supply males were slowly effected, and the prices of last market were barely maintained. Best muttoo, hew Bd. to 80. ; ewes, from 7d. to 71d. per lb. Lambs," prices, 3U., 325., 315., 295. ; current, Zia to sa. ; bket faced, 14s. 6d. to 21s. a head. Pigs brought 61. to 6..68. per stone. Numbers in market:—Fat cattle, 381; store ditto, 185; milk cows, 25; sheep, 6,274; Mem sheep, 1,436 ; pigs, 308. CRYSTAL PALACE. ONE 13IIIILINO THIIESDAT, SEPT. 20.—Admissions on payMeDit 8 , 473 ; ditto by season tickets, 3,220. Total visitors, 11,693. rAdVertilteMellt.l—HOLLOWAY'S PILLS are unde niably the finest medicine in the world for biliousness and leib elation. In all cases of deranged stomach, determination of blood to the head, bile, sick headache, liver and &amino* plaints, there is no medicine known that will give suck hear elate relief as these renowned pills ; young and old, rick eel poor, patronise them, and so many ones are effected hr.. use, and their praise is sounded from the torrid to the OW zone ; in truth, persons who travel consider them a necemol requisite. In su try weather or warm climates, or in latiia blood becomes overheated, the liver torpid, the skin Wald with prickly hest, and the whole system lansuld and exhausted. Noth so soon gives relief as Holloway's Pills BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATH& BIRTH& 001NWALLIS.—Wiptensber 18, at Chaeombe Priori, the wlie kekor Cornwallis, of a daughter. BOWE —September 19, the wife of E. R. J. Howe, of Linecies Inn, of a ion. d LlNDSAY.—lleptember 19, at Ilsnwell, Middlesex, the wile J. M. Midair, M.D., of a eon. MACCULLOCH.—On the 17th of August last, at Paradise-1 0 Ni Malabar-hill, Bombay, the wife of Hugh Bowie Maccalieg. Seq., of a son. MM.—September 111, at Clarendon•road, W, wife of Y. May, Esq., of • eon. PAlNE—September 18, at Sues-court Addlestone, SAITO , IS wife of J. M. Paine, leg., of • son. WHlTE.—September 18, at Alles-park-villas, Twickenham, wife of J. White, Esq., of a daughter. MARRIAGES. DICKSON—BARKER.—September 18, at the Priorl kwe, Cb trci6 Carteddl, by the Rev. R. C. Hubbersty, Arthur Benson llic Rag- of Abbots Reading. Lancashire, to Harriett Etirahe o4 daught we ar of John Barker, Fad., of Broughton Lodge , l'e' rw. inintroL OILIAON—MACHAB.--September 18, at Mt. Slim' Engligj l t copal Chapel, Glasgow, by the Rev. E. Gillum, William 11. '" >a , OW 011lson,Eaq., Commander In the P. and 0 . St eam Company, to Jessie Campbell, daughter of Allan Mame ), So , Glasgow. RlSK—FORD.—Septernbar 18, at Christ Church, Berroondwf, by the Rev. R. Marshall Martin, Daniel Richard, sou id M ir ' Both' William Wise, of Glenpdligrove, Old Hea t road. to 0 1 *ls Elizabeth, daughter of the late Yr. William Teed, mondsey. widow of t he late Admiral lio n . T. Hoek ag ed 58 Mr. Lewis Hawes, asad 61 . " aro ll ßAlPKA HA Est.iffe l wirdirl:::": lBeptaa :seve4 H lB:4s : B4o. leSemo477lllreeberr eer .bleber l er tbirje l l° : °:,: l l":"Ll : 9B ll ,:Bl : :4Bll4l"narda l us b 4T ; HI 15.111.1- . na4k7Bbs:linle:taire(evorrey,ta74TolLeWigh"‘e.llBlBBll4:. )11 r i u r 0 1:4: 0 41K : 413 1 : .. De spoisie l t aTE stead seed of Ifftsropstrssi, Ittneysquars, ---_- -- Mated sod Published by r 1 a. % o pal Loodea. Knie Iti la ' plistic2.. ..-• t• Lorabi4tria, ix Office la Lombard-street. In la. heeded d indie" JUPAY, nava= !1. WA ' O • 11011iN Ya .1 ',snarl CITY 0 N.A.IIQA 046 , 3r. Cr i t h E i rron ti -~,u~tc lob BB wield Vie 00di to met • •PItBAI, ABM I BCOTL • fiktng pow • triod•rred J &Ars I Palemp-mon4 ittßdOt winos : -wood :11 ea oblMl ni a r. 31. POI" 6 °. • 161 oe D. as 'mter V Rip& is...vnis, vorifick.wia Ado every so the acre con off the turning trot rpl7 to Hill en etolulo. r or ok i rre I e Woe ‘ 1 - Oook. a b r a—Furt ' br • IMP* , Addliat u r B "w] sod ( was, sc., • Lax ... '', Fig b PIO" ID The WWII irceato o ltst a De` Brus wit bob el Wbobbio I W and ia rr . r lai BLove, as 'Miller troublit 11 atostallaPk Lts., t Wu' . I Price' 4t. SALLOW, Iwo this bt are 111814011 F i" • CAI Itarbto Bp town sad I cao 1.,:050u H YA: rims Rye yr. R ti irA W.! r4ILD II , . I H Y) Dna lIHEII Nylon Hysat limn 13,11= Me l t Boy! Berl Bop per DIP T°' 8 Sift ai /CAM 1100 Z as i 6 'red& dialed tadl4•l Sold by sod bees • "Ka hillrocU ea 11* lies el 1 01iriev Useellel IhIlY Whole InUlak k ark for arKeep. -v. TH. , ebtauy e i e Ow l : 64 M sqlosi