The Express. — London, England, 1868-06-16 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. The House of Lords was engaged for some time lent evening in a discussion raised by the Earl of Stanhope upon the subject of public schools; but the County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction Bill, and a measure for amending the law relating to the sale of poisons each passed a stage. As very often happens on Po Monday, the most 'M eant questions addressed t o members of the ge vernment were those of which no notice had. 'been given. Mr. La , ard elicited from the 'Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for India that, although two of Sir R. Napier's mrussagers, Colonels Milward and Fusser, had arrived inLanden, the gallant general's most important dogwatch, that in which he described the distinguished services of officers of theAbyminian expedition, had not come to hand. Mr. Monk obtained from Mr. Disraeli a promise that the Revenue O ffi cers' Disabilities Removal Bill should he put down es the first order of the day en Friday next ; an Lood Elcho ascertained, by appeal to the same aty, that a holiday will be given to nil gentlemen employed in the public offices, who are anxious to attend the volunteer rerteu• • at Windsor next Satarday, in the ranks of the corps to which they belong. There waa no subetrintial opposition to in committee upon the Irish Reform Bill, b ut h e ldt parture of the Speaker from the chair was delayed for sonic time by a discussion which arose upon a suggestion made by Mr. Sandford, with the countenance of Mr. Henley, that the govern ment should withdraw the clauses of the bill which related to the redistribution of seats, and confine the enactments of the nieasnre to the ex tension of the franchise. Some dozen or so of Irish and English members took part in this de bate, and the re commendation of the hon. member for Malden was very generally appro . ved : Among those who slake most strongly in its favour were Mr. C. Fortescue and Mr. Lawson, who were respectively Irish Secretary and Irish Attorney-Gweral under the late administration. Mr. Disraeli declined to do more than promise a "respectful and mature consider ation " to the proposal which had been made ; but when the rtZstribution clauses were reached in committer, he inured their postponement, in order that the government might have time to make up their minds upon the subject- The first sunendinent that excited any discussion was a proposal by Mr. Lawson to confer the franchise in boroughs upon the occupiers of houses rated at 4/., instead of, as provided by the bill, at ~ more than " 4/. The Earl of Mayo opposed the amendment on the ground that it would materially interfere with the law of rating without producing any corresponding ad venter ; and this view was, after a short con versation, adopted by the committee, Mr. Law son's motion being rejected by a majority of 11- 188 to 177. After this question had bftn disposed of, Mr. Bearden rose to move the reduction of the limit of the lodger franchise from 101. to 31. The member for Athlone, who is not yet forgiven for suggesting the abdication of the Queen, was re ceived as he had been 01100 before, by loud groans from nearly all parts of the house, and his amendment was at once rejected ; the only effect of its proposal being to prevent the conside ration of a motion for the reduction of the limit to 61., of which notice had been given by Mr. Scrjeunt Burry. The clause providing for the appointment of a boundary commission was omitted from the bill ; and the next subject which engaged the attention of the committee was the conveyance of voters. The 18th clause of the bill declared the payment of the expense of con veying voters in boroughs to the poll to be illegal ; and Mr. Morris proposed to omit Revere] boroughs from the operation of this section. Varioue opinions were expressed as to the propriety or impropriety of paying these 1.111.4`100 s ; and, while there appeared to be a general desire to diminish the cost of elections to the emndates, there was much difference of opinion este how that resultemildbest be obtained Mr. M. Chambers, for instance, recommended the multiplication of polling bo oths, while Mr. Mill expressol a strong opinion that all necessary expenses ought to be paid by the public. Ulti mately Lord Mayo suggested that the amendment should be confined to the counties of the cities of Cork, Gehvity, and Limerick, and this suggestion found acceptance with the committer, Galway being retained upon a divi sion by a majority of 48—ayes, 131; noes, tie. A f ter these questions had been . dieposed of, the pro gress of the bill was rapid and easy; and when the Chairman reported progress only a few post pined clauses (including those relating to the re distribution of seats) and some new ones remained to be agreed to. Two measures introduced by Sir S. Nortlesite, for amending the law under whichour Indian empire is governed, were read a second time without any general discussion ; but some of their details were criticised by Mr. Ayrton and Colonel Sykes. Before the report of supply was agreed to there was a short conversation between Mr. Childers, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Mr. Glad stone upon the old topics of the dissolution of par liament and the granting of supplies. The mem bers for Pontefract andiSouth Lancashire did not hesitate to assent to the granting of the supplies for the whole year; but Mr. Childers took exception to the interpretation placed upon the precedents of 1830 and 1841 by Mr. Hunt the other evening; and, although that right hon. gentleman argued in support of his own view of the case, Mr. Gladstone pointed out some distinc tions between the attitude assumed towards the government of the day by Sir IL Peel and the opposition of the year 1841 and that of his hon. friendsandhimaelf at the present moment. In a conversation which preceded the second reading of the Registration Bill, Mr. E. Baines, Mr. Mill, and Mr. Laboucliere called atten tion to defects which they believed to exist in the bill as to the registration of lodgers and other points. Mr. Locke and the Solicitor- General alleged reasons why the suggested provi sions were unnecessary, and the latter hon. and learned gentleman reminded the lime* that if the measure was defective, its faults might be removed by the select com mittee to which it was to be referred. Mr. Pugh and Sir G. Bowyer deplored the temporary aboli tion of appeals to the Court of Common Pleas ; while Mr. Leeman, as an old clerk of the peace, con gratulated the government upon having brought in the bast measure which could have been introduced to attain the object they had in view. Mr. Denman recommended that the select committee should have poieer to examine a few witnesses ; and Mr. Dodson, the chairman of committees, ted oontrissiions of the time allowed for co l tr a cting two or three parts of the process of registration, by means of which parliament might be got together about the 9th or 10th of Novem ber. Mr. Hardy promised attention to the various suggestions which had been offered, and said that be would leave it to the committee to decide whether or not they would take evidence. After the till was read a second time it was referred to a select committee. The house then adjourned. Taz PUBLIC &IMMO Bun..—Yesterday a meet ing wan held at the Salisbury Hotel, Plest-street, com mis a deputation from the oorpomtion of Bedford, and , with a view to make common cause against the contemplated confiscation for the benefit of the rich of the edneafional endowments left for the lower middle classes and the poor, whether by the Public Schools Bill or future legislation according to the recommendations of the Schools Inquiry Commis sion. After a long discussion the gentl em en present waited upon the r piective members of parliament of their localities, and u them at the preeen moment to watch the Public Schoo 17 003 7ecially, and to support the Viscount amendments to be pro by Mr. Kerslake, M.P., and Enfield, IL . [Advertisement.]—Homow.ty'a Pru.s. flatuliney, bi dieorders, Woo* e n TeZin t., And Indi nervousness, end general debility, are all evils may be easily sad speedily subdued by them Inestimable gran which aver are at OnCe the mildest and meat ellisacioas medicine yet dintovered. They do not merely get rid for the thee of the particular diseaae, but emwelse so powerful. beneficial, and an influence upon the whole irLetein as to protest it from the mcurrenee of the same Miletion. Thel im part tone to the stomach, restnre the mpebte, give strength and 1904. and male the patient feel himself quite • new man. Heine .omPotad of vegetable attracts, without the admixture of arif 4 dg em i.... Wa ' va " ub "ta 6o e whatronr, thew pills are as We as they are TEN CE ARGUS 404 L.YST .M.t#D4MB Madr,me Rachel, otherwise Rachel Lseerson, of No. 47,, New Bondartreet, again appeared before Mr. Knee', at Marlboreagh-stmet, to answer &charge of oh till, money by false pretences tram Mrs. Mary 'Maker B • The court was densely crowded, and several persons of peention were on the belch. Mr. Digby Seymour sad Mr. Sleigh, instructed by Mr. Troggatt, appeared for the prisoner; and Mr. M. Wil liams appeased for the prosecution. Before lie easearas resumed, Madeline Rachel begged lo be permitted to mike a state ment. She said she had peal an immense aura to be pro perly defended, and her case had not been thoroughly attended. When a warrant was obtained against her, a person named Aussell, fraMthe .Bice of Mr. Edwil. Lewis, called on her and advised herto fly, but this she refused to do. Somerlaysafterwardsshe,gamMr. Sayer,from the office of Mr.E.Lewrs,SOLforthepcyp of her defence. She hadbeen led to believe up to last •TSi ay that her case was pro gressing favourably unacrihe dreadful circumstances sur rounding It. About that.thae a man calling himself Davis came to her daughter's residence in Maddox-street, and en seeing her (Ma(huno Rachel) said a charge of con epiracy had been madeagainst her, and that if she would give a certain sum of money the matter might bo gut over; that only half-au-hourlbefore the case came on last Mon day she found that Ms. M. Williams was to appear against her, and that she was not tole defended in the manner she expected. The result wart that she was sent to pram because she had no bail ready. She was informed that Mr.. Sayer, to whom she had pad the money for her de fense, was not present, as he had met with an accident. Mr. Knox said that statement was quite true. Mr. Sayer had been injured by a cab. Madame Rachel went on to say that she engaged Mr. Froggatt to defend her, and that several briefs which had been drawn up.by her professional advisers were not correct, as some of the circurrudances of her came had been omitted. She had only asked permission to make this statement, in order to show the muddle she was in with re t to her defence. rr. e . Knox said having made this statement, it would appear that, now the prisoner had regularly instructed a solicitor, the case must proceed in the regular course. Mr. N. Williams then rose and raid—Before he entered upon the further examination of Mrs. Borrodsule, he wished to state that he tad received the fullest assistance from Lord Ranelegh and Lord Runelagh's solicitor, from which it would ap, that with rospoot to the letters read last Monday, T Ranelagh knew nothing about them ; mid that Lord Ranelagh, on receiving letters from Mrs. Berrodaiks wrote to that lady's relatives on the matter. He proposed to shape his case thus. lie should take she earliest opportunity of putting Lord Ranelagh into the witness-box to show that Mrs. Borrodaile had been the dupe of the greatest y that ever came into a court of justice • that Lord olugh, who occa sionally went to Mada me Rachel's shop, might have seen Mrs. Borrodaile there, but that he had nothing to do with the letters, and certainly could in no way have been pecuniarily benefited. The lady, Mrs. Borrodaile, ho would show was blinded by the letters she read, which she thought came from Lord Bauelagb, the deception being con fi rmed by one of the letters haying his lord ship's monogram on it. He would just say one word in reference to the statement made by Madame Rachel just now. The court had been told that some attempt to get a settlement of the matter had been made. What the person Davis (lid his client was ignorant of, and had the proposition been whispered to him he should have at once withdrawn from the ease, and brought the matter before the court. He would next call Mr. Randall, the corn-cutter referred to, who in the coarse of causemelicm with Mrs. Borrodaile, was told by that lady that she had parted with nearly 4,000/. to M ad ame Rachel, and that subsequently a man caned on him and told him with reference to the maser sation ho had had with Mrs. Borraduilo that he had better not interfere. The same person called again and said he was Lord Ranelagh. He told the pence he knew Lord Ranclagh, that he was not Lord Ranelagh, and must leave the shop. He would next call the evidence of a lad who saw the case in the newspapers, and he would prove that Madame Rachel hired him to write her correspon dence, and that he remembered being asked to write a letter in an extravagant amatory style, and that a man who was present, who went by the name of Edwards, said he could write a better. Madame Rachel having re marked that it was a schoolboy's handwriting. He would conclude by stating he would put in Hayne's bill of costs for selling out 1,4e01., as alleged for volunteering par pesos, and then proceed to call his witnesses. Mr. Abrams, for Mr. Randall, begged to say that hie client was not a corn-cutter, but a corn-extractor. Mrs. Borrodaile was then called by Mr. Montagu Wil liams, and resumed her evidence in chief as follows : I saw the gentleman who was represented to ho Lord Ranelagh twice at Madame Rackets. To the best of my belief the gentleman was Lord Ranelagh. I never saw the gentleman represented to he Lord Ranelagh only on these occasions. This was in May, 1866, or about that time. After the money had been advanced I used to see Madame Rachel every day, and I wrote letters at that time at Madame Rachel's dictation. Madame Rachel handed me letters and said they were from Lord Rane lagh. I began to receive letters in 1866, and up to this year—very nearly the last time I saw her. The last time I staked for my money of Madame Rachel was four months ago. Madame Rachel always said she had not my money, and that she always gave it to "My dear William," and I said I should be glad if he would return it to me. She said elue Weald write end Pk 19r it. I always gave the letters I wrote to Madame Rachel. r remember on one occasion while in the back shop at Madame Rachel's she brought me a cigar, and said Lord Ranelagh had sent it to her—it was pa rtly smoked. This was in the early part of 1867. I remember calling on Mr. Randall the chiropodist, I think in Feb., this year ; and I had a conversation with him. Mr. Haynes, a solicitor, was in troduced to me by Madame Rachel, and acted for me in selling out some property to pay Madame Rachel some money. The bill of costs is the one Mr. Haynes seat me. It is for the sum of 1,400/.—the sum in question. I never wrote any letter in reference to this matter save and except in the presence and at the dictation of Madame Rachel— except one to Messrs. Lewis and Lewis. Ma. Seymour here handed a number of letters to Mr. Knox, who, having marked them, handed them to Mrs. Borrodaile, and she admitted they were written by her. Mr. Se ymour then nose-axamihed Mrs. Borrodaile as follows :—Captain Borrodaile died in India. I came to England in 1861. I mode the acquaintance of Madame Rachel in 1864. I told her I had a claim to relationship with the family of Lord Kensington. I told her that I had a cousin a member of the same family, named Edwards. He was a captain ; but he was now a colonel of the Guards. His Christian flame is William. I have never seen him at Madame Rachel's. I have relations in North Wales. Cope is only a relative by manage. In 1866 he was living in North Wales. I represented to him that I wee about to be married—that was, I think, about September, 1866. Previously to 1866 I had not seen my cousin for three years. I did not see him in 1886. I did not see any gentleman of the name of Edwards in 1866. I saw Mr. in 1866, when be cams to London. I did not at that time know the appearance of Lord Ranelagh so well as I ' do now, but I knew him by sight. In 186.5 Madame Rachel told me that Lord Rauclugh desired to be intro- ducal to me—it might have been in June. I had money transactions with Madame Rachel at the end of 1866. I do not recollect her lending me 6001. She did not lend me 8001. There was not an unsettled account between na in 1866. I had made payments to her through my solicitor. She had not lent money to me, nor found money for me. Madame Rachel never brought an action against me. She put me into Whiteezoes-street prison for a debt due to her Decembtr, 1886. Mr. Knox—Was the action in Madame Rachers name P Mr. Seymour—lt was. Crees-exammation resumed—Madame Rachel did not lend me 5001. to pay bills. I will not swear the letter produced is in my handwriting. I will not swear one way or the other. My opinion is that it is not. Mr. Knox—That will not do. Borrodaile—l will not swear that it is not. Mr. Seymour—That letter was written by Mr. Haynes, Mrs. Borrodaile's solicitor, and he is subpoenaed here to proclaim it. Mrs. Borrsdailo—li do not recollect writing it. I will swear I did not borrow 6001. of Madame Rachel for which I gave her an order on Mesas. Grindley and Co. Madame Rachel did not pay any money for me. I was imprisoned in 1886. I did not borrow hou. and if I said so in a letter it is false. I was in White Cross-street for Ave weeks. Maclaine Rachel, before I was sent to Whiteurees-dreet, did not send me a debtor and creditor account—none at all. The letter produced, I think, is in my handwriting. lam not certain, but I believe it is. Mr. Seymour—l will read the letter. (This letter, as well as several others, related to business matters.) Mrs. Borrodaile—The letter was all written by iadame Beefier. dictation. Mr. Seymour—That is all very well ; but we will judge of that by and bye. The letter is written to your own solicitor. Mrs. Borrodaile.—l was living in George-street, Han over-square, at the time. Mr. Seymour—lf Madame Rachel said what was false you need not have written it. Mrs. Borrodaile.—She had great influence over M. I received no account from Madame Rachel. I 'agreed with Madame Rachel to pay 1,6001. by yearly instal ments of 1401. in consequence of advi ce t o th a t effect from Messrs. Lawless, Nelson, and Goodman, my solicitors, in Graerchurch-street. I did not owe Madame Rachel the money, but I agreed to do it to get out of Whitecrow street Prison. I was put in there for a debt I never owed. Madame Rachel asked me to copy something for her one day. rayMg it would make me clear of ever ything,ever but I a.rwarrls found that it bound me pay 1,000/., and she got the money from me in the way I tell you. Mr. Seymour read a letter, purporting to be written by Mrs. Borrudaile to Mr. Nelson. Borrodaile—lt Jaime I was incommunication with Mr. Nelson, but I think him too respect a bl e a man to play into the bands of Madame Rachel. While in prison I dal not agree at first to give Madame Rachel a charge of 1601. a year In lien of the mortgage, but I afterwards aid. A person from Messrs. Grindley's called and prxidavel an order for the payment of 000/., signed in the name of Mary Tucker Borrodaile. Mrs. Borrodaile—l will not swear the order la in my lunalwraing, but I believe it .P. Mr. Seymour mail another letter. Mrs. Itorrodial•—l had been I. licitke with Mears. Lawless, Kelso% and Goodman, and I offered Madame Rachel a °haws of 160 k a year on my property, for the purpose of perng off Madame Rachel's mortgage on R I did not Volalve many Mims from Mosses. law less, Nelson, and Goodmen. 1 will not swear I did not receive a letter reduced, awl give it to Mr. Haynes. I son afraid to asensr because I cannot recollect. After the arrangement about the 160 k I went to Madame Beakers. Mr. Cridhusd was my solicitor in 1866. I told every one that the gentleman I sew was Lord Ranelagh. I had only seen a little of him. I know Lord Ranelagh by eight, hut always thought it was Lard Banelagh that was intredseed to me. At the end of May, 1868, 1 was introduced to the real Lard Ranelagh. Mr. Seymour—And then you saw thedifferesse between the real and the mock lords. Mrs. Borrodaile—Which is the mock or ? I see Lord Rauclagh in court, and was never introduced to any rue else. At the end of May or June, 1868, I was iabroduced to a person as Lord Ranelagh wham I kMOW new to be Lord Ranclagh. I mean to say that Lord Ranelagh is the ripen who was introduced tome by Madame Rachel as the ty enw ie rhe w r h Zo7d 4B ß an sin liow‘ i° or mar ; 7 l2 . l se r lroa Vm aa ttie r w" saids There is • sitting-room and shop at Madame Rachel's. Madame Rachel was with her &wider and a Russian lady, and she opened the door leading from one place to the other, and said, " This is the person who loves you," and I said, " Are you Lord Ranelagh r and he then gave me his card. It is the gentleman in mart if there is not some one very like him. I will not answer any question about my first child. Mr. Seymour—Yon must answer it. Mrs. Borrodaile—l never knew Lord Basely& by sight before 1868. Mr. Seymour—Have you ever said that in consequence of Lord Ranelagh's interference and leading your husband to suspect that your first child was net his, he mur dered a man, and that Lord Banelagh was the cause of the (panel between you and your husband?—Any ques tion put by me need not give the slightest pain to any friend of Lord Banelagh's ; but I feel that, in justice, L mud put it. Snag —l will ask the question myself, wad parka's. I may succeed in getting from Mrs. Borrodaile what you require. Mrs. Berretta's, in reply to Mr. Knox, then said—There was an estraestra ngement between me and my husband, through tome one's interference ; but I never said it was through Lord Ranelagh. But afterwards Madame Rachel told me it was so. Mr. Seymour—l ask her if she has not stated that her husband murdered a man because of what was said? I, after that Madame Rachel told me, thought Lord Ranelagh was the person who urged my husband to kill the man 'n consequence of the report circulated ; but I sever said angling about Lord iielagh. Seymour then proceeded to read the following letters: — Dear Maclaine Raehal,—l went to Mr. Crialand's yeaterrla and to my horror I found Lord Banelagh there. He was in a state, and made use of veil , tad language, and I hat my temper. As no one was present but Mr. Cridland, Lord B. and myself, I know that I am safe in that quarter, for It will never paws the Mare. I really thought he would have struck me. If be bad done so Mr. (..Yidhual would have given him in charge. Lard R. told me there was a dear William as well as a dear Tommy, which was very cowardly of him to expo e my a ff airs. He mig ht have spared my feelings thus far, and all might have ended well; but when he mentioned William's name I called him a liar and a thief. If lard It. f ag ot that he was talking to a lady by birth and parkin's, I treated him as a cowardly, unmanly vagabond. Let me implore you to give me my letters, which will prevent me being subjected to any mere annoyancea,—l am, 1 yours very truly, MAST T. DOIMODAILa. Witness believed the brewer's daughter referred to was Miee Men: ; so at least Madame Rachel told her. Both the letters were dictated by Madame Rachel, who told her to write them to her, and she did so. 7, 0 , Feb. 20, SM.—Dear Malone Raehen? ent' nelose y lr e A n a = u lred's letter, which I reocived this morning. 'You know the meaning of it. Give me the box of letters, and put an end to all my misery, which has boon killing me. You shall not be made the victim to serve other people. As dou have kept my (enflame° I shall repay you as a lady ought to o, in consequence of thoannoyanoes you have been put to my unfortunate affairs. flume written to Mr. thidknd, an th r= him about the cruel at Mx that took placebetween Lord Ranelagh and my dear husband, and you will see that Mr. Cridland will keep it secret. I wrote it in haste. I only told him a part. You may rounaber that I told him mane years past, when I returned from India, the usifortunate affair. If Lord Itariebigh had not mentioned William's memo in the pretence of Mr. Cridland I should not have mentioned the 'ad affair. By referring to the card enclosed, you will see that the dates are correct.—With kind regards, yours say truly, MIST TUCKER BORRODAILI. The brewer's daughter hutment to tali me that Lord Banelagh is to give hex away to-morrow. The following is a copy of the card alluded to :—I was married on the 2nd Destsiber, 1848. First child born the 20th December, 1847, at Brampton. Second child born 17th October, 1840. December 20th.—Dear Madame Bachel,—l am sorry that when your grandchildren called upon me to-day that Mrs. Smith should say I was not at home, for it was =true. I had not left the house. Will you, dear Madame Bald, kindly give me the box of letters which was sent to your hoar, and entrusted to your care for me, or will you tell me when I can all for them. If you are asked any questions about my affairs, please my yorl know nothing about them. I send you a pretty little book for Harry, as he was disappointed of the cake m. I promised him—With kind regards, believe me, yours very truly, MART T. Ikurrioesats. P.B.—lf you will send the box with your man Henry, I will give him something to bring it. ' - Mr. D. Seymour Would now go back to September, 1866: se, George-street, Hanover-square, Rept. S. My awn dear W il liam,— If you knew what I have suffered since Baturdaynight on your aecormt one unkind word would never escape your Ups to me. Your brother-in-law went to the Carlton Qub to we Lord Ranelagh. They told s.himthat he was out of town, sad bad not seen him for a ww.2. I,ls. oraLer-lh-:idif *"en went to No. 7 , New Burlington-street, and he went there yesterday and to-day. The servant told him his lordship bad been out of town for three weeks, and that all his letters had been sent to Lowther Coptic. Had it not been for her being ro obliging, curse her, ft would not have given me so mach trouble. Binne Mr. Cope has married my airier he is quite a Welshman, and you would agree with me had you seen the frantic manner he was running about London looking for that invisible person who could not be found, thanks to our lucky stare, and yet con tent he took us to Regent-street and bought a photograph of his lordship, whose nose he did not admire. Poor fellow, be pet it into MI pocket that he might take it out when he felt inclind, width he is quite welcome to do. My brother-in-law took me to Rachel, and she denied all knowledge of any trainee time between his lordship and myself, and as well she might. Mr. Cope made me promise meet solemnly that I should leave my present lodgings, as he was under the iropreseton that the of the haw an d poor Rachel were in league together in I P rio 3 h °P n i g me into a marriage with his lordship. Mr. Cope and my sister made me promise on er again and again that I would not see Rachel again, sal had led titan to suppose that she had been the promoter of his lordship's intriguing with me. When rar raster was at Rachel's she was furious with her. I wish you could have wen it all without being awn. Anyone less Interested than my self would have been highly unwed, and it was a great e ff ort on :3= to keep my gravity. I shall not sleep in Oeorgeetreet t. I wialud Xr. Cope and my sister good byti,_and returned to North Wales by the the o'clock train.—With food and dearest love, believe me, your affectionate end loving MAZY BORZOI:4MB. P.R.—They would not leave town until they made me come witlithem to Mr. Haynes, but fortunately he was not in town. Mrs. Borrodaile, by manage , had a relation named Cope, who lived in Wales. Had throughout thought that the person she was corresponding with was Lord Banelagh. When writing "Dear William," she considered she was writing to Lord Ranelagh. Never asked her family whether they approved of her marriage with Lord Rane lagh. Her brother-in-law came to London and tried to find out Lord Banelagh ; this was in September, 1866. Her brother bou ght _ a photograph of Lord Ranelagh. Wrote to "Dear William, ' telling him his photograph had been bought. That letter was written at Madame Rachel's dictation. Knew Mrs. Lilley went to Moon's along with Cope. Did not recollect whether Cope said that Madame Rachel ought to be prosecuted if she had committed any fraud on her. Could not recollect whether she said that she could not be any party to a charge of fraud against Madame Rachel, for she was indebted to Madame Rachel in a large sum of money. Mr. D. Seymour read the following: ettarda t i ta fvellinff. 7, George-etreet, Feb. 8, lea—Dear Madame el,- Ict me implore of you to give me my letteri. All that is ray power I will do foe you in return. I would give you 1404 and, indeed, SHOO% if I had it. Indeed, I scarcely know what to do. I received such letters this morning from Wales, lam nearly distracted. I have written to-day to Mr. Cridland and to Mr. Ha nes. I hme endows you the . It is to satisfy Mr. who writes day to my and is the "nsinag poet.' Mr. and Mr. Haynes are become verygreat Mad,. I thought it advisable to write to both. You understand the motive. You have children of your own. It is to save my daughter's name, that her mother may not be de graded in the opinion of the world. You know it will not do to have my name mentioned with Captain W. Edward's. It would be ruin to myself and my datmhter. I still feel immured you will not refane givhg me my letters. I will never give you cease to regret having done so. With kind regards.—/ am, very sincerely yours, IL Homumati.s. Mrs. Borvodailo Raid that too was written at the dicta tion of Madame Rachel. Mr. D. Seymour—Wee this also from dictation? Thursday Ear Dec. 12.—My own dear William,—Ton will see by the enclosed a Mr. Smith who told me that he wag Lord Randagh's solicitor has been wry to my family, who are al/ furious to think that I bare been duped by a mad who has dis owned all knowledge of me, which is diahoaournble and unmanly no his part, for I have been a good friend to him. Now my dar ling my diens have mane to a crisis, and I deli have to part with yw, the ormacquenee of your daisy, had you married me, as you declared you would do more than a year ago la the presence of Frank, and year three misters, Mrs. We, and Btmaimeon, I should not have written to Cluitenham to the/iamb Rotel topre pare our rooms. Remember what my dear Florence said, I could not be in the same rooms with you, without being married. I wish had been an extravagant little monkey. fl shall wait till Satur day. It will then be out of my power to do anythi more for rc z iw With love whdies and kisses, ever your affsrtionate, and )41111' BOZIODAILZ. Mrs. Borrodaile here paused for a moment, and ap peared to shed tears. Mr. D. Seymour—Take your time, Madam. Why did you write that letter ? Mn. Borrodaile—l wrote it more from wanting some thing to do than anything else. Mr. Hnos—l must have a special note made of that part of the letter which refers to the promise made some time back, and the several parties named in the letter. Mn. Borrodaile cross-examined—Mr. Smith wrote to her friends, who were furious. Captain Edwards had a brother. Could not say whether his name was Frank, and Captain Edwards had three or four sisters. Lord Bane legli never made a personal promise of marriage, he only did so by letter. Madame Rachel told her he said he would marry her. Mr. D. Seymour —ln this letter you lay you had been duped by some one to whom you had been a good friend. Now who was this William you were writing to and telling that you had been duped F Mrs. Borrodaile—l shall not tell you. Mr. Knox—Did you conceive you were writing to Lord Rouelagh when you wrote this letter P . Mrs. Bo I did. I wrote to rooms at the hotel for myself and Lord letter I wrote I thought I wrote to Lad Mr. D. Seymour than : X. Oeorge-ativet, Hanever-ogaeno. lAeb. 8, 1686. Drar here eat nveima tram Madame liach4 the box containieg latent whisk: by W. Edwards left at ler hoses for me. I Mall feel singed by your emelt In Madame Rachel. and 'equalling be M give them be me without iiiihr.—Yeara akar r. 11/1111RODAILIL .1. Harem, Mee. Mrs. Borrodaße said she wets the letter, biker' that Captain Mime& had left a hex coats/elm ler Idlers with Madams Rachel, sad hal tea her seliciter, Mr. en. When Me wrote drat liblwarils had left the boa, she meant that Lied Remake' had left it. Mr. Knox said—U kis period astkiag in the evideaes has appeared to isaptieale Lord limekiln is the least degree. I have, bosestsrer thought it but fair to give his loniship an opportimityeemaking his statement. Lord lienelagh-1 has only to repeat what I /debut on the pravious occarion. I have ae cognisance of anything that has taken piece between Madame Rachel and Mr.. Borendaile. Nnananeeyy affair"; have ever taken place in which I wan caonceneel, and I only heard of these matters in November ' HIV, I immediately put the case into the hands of my solicitor, who omaniameated with the rile tivcs of Mrs. Borrodaile, and since then I have had no thing to do with the matter. ha some scandal has eccurrel in one respect I may here state that the story Meat look ing into a lady's bath is wholly unfounded. Mr. D. Seymenr—l ask, whether you were introdaced in May, 1868 V Lord Ranekgh—l swear I never knew Mn. Borrodaile by sight, and only recollect seeing her at Mr. Cridland'e unke. Mr. Knox—Mrs. Borsodaile's statement is that she raw you at Madame &Whorl is 1866, and was iatroduced. Lord Razielagh—l might have been at Madame Rachel's, and Madame Rachel might have named Mrs. Borrodaile to me, but I only gave a passing glance, and should not have known her agar. - • - - Mr. 81eigh—I can only say we are too glad to give Lord Ranelagh an opportunity of =hag his statement. The case *as then &dimmed on bad. Mr. Edward Lewis begged to be allowed to make a reply to Madame Rashers start. He had only deferred Ms answer at the time as he did not wish to interfere with the course of proceedings. The explanation was of much im portance to him. Mr. Knox would suggest that Mr. E. Lewis should ar range with Madame Embers solicitor the time for an ex planation. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.- JITNE 15. After Terra Mai Priva Sittinga at Westminster.—(Before the Lord Chief Justice and a Special Jury.) DIST ALLAH V. WHISEHIJIST AND °THEM. After our report left yesterday, the plaintiff continued : After leaving prison 1 saw Mr. Kimber, my solicitor, on the following day, and he accompanied me to my hotel ; he asked me to send a telegram for him. I did so, and on my return he said a Turkish gentleman had called on the part of the Turkish consul to see me, and showed me his card. I said I had never beard of him. Mr. Kimber said, "He looks a very nice fellow and I have made an ap pointment to meet him at his hot el , and accompany him to the Turkish consul - general ' s. " We went there, and I was introduced to Asmond Effendi, and we went to the Turkish consul's. After that the Turkish consul ex pressed his readiness to render me any assistance. c l a til ui e thought he was a friend of the Turkish I had never seen Osman Effendi before that day; be invited us to dine with him, but on our inviting him to dine with us he ac isipted it. Osman was a very good linguist—he spoke French, Italian, English, Arabic, and Turkish—he expressed his readiness to do anything for me; he said he was acquainted with several families at Antwerp, who, lie said, were anxious to assist me • he also said he was very intimate with Mr. Grey, brother of Sir George Grey, then Secretary of State for the Home Department; he offered to lend me money and to assist me in other ways ; he always appeared to be well off he kept good society had good wine, rode in cab e, and invited me to dine with him ; he introduced me to a person named Hermanaen, a friend of his, a Danish consul iii Paris; I was in troduced by Osman to a person named Verstraaten, a petroleum merchant, the father-in-law of Her mansen ; ho lived in good society, gave good dinners, and drove about in a carriage ; shortly after my liberation I became ill from typhoid fever. was told that I lost my sexism for • couple of days. Osman paid me much attention. He was the only per son I knew there, as Mr. Kimber had returned to Eng land. Osman nursed me during my illness. During that time he and Hermansen busied themselves about my affairs. I placed my affairs when at Antwerp entirely in his hands, and he took possession of everything. I also authorised him to obtain my property from the authori ties, and also to settle my hotel bill. Mr. Kimber advised me to entrust my affairs to Osman ; there was no proof on the trial of any dealing between me and Osman before the death of Ridley. On my return to England I owesponded with Osman. (The letters were put in and read.) Osman asked me to get him employment DI London, and I spoke to the Turkish consul. He told me he had been employed by the English government to buy cattle for the Cnmean war. That was true. He said his brother-In-law was the Sul tan's doctor, and on inquiry I found the Sultan had a doc tor of that name. All his letters were seized when I was arrested. I was interrogated abo at their content, by the president at the trial. I wrote Osman that I should be very glad to see him in London, when be had arranged my affairs at Antwerp. He afterwards came to Loudon and stayed with me in Weymouth-street. At the end of July, 1865, he left for Paris. (The letters referred to by Mr. Serjeant Parry in his opening statement were put in and read.) Suliman Bey was staying with him when he re ceived Osman's letter to change the money into English notes, and a request that the letter should ho burnt. Suliman Bey advised me to retain the letter and take the number of the notes. I retained the letter and Suliman Boy took the number of the notes, and I placed the money the same day at my banker's. Oxman returned to London almost immediately, and offered me 80/. to keep for him, but I declined, fearing I might lose it. He m.4 "Put it with the rest at yourbankees." I paid it in. When Osman ca me to London he said he expected pro perty in Turkey and the interest to come to him. He said he had got this money from Constantinople. I paid him sometimes in gold and sometimes in cheques. I made ap plication for 1,0001. on Ridley's life policy, but I was in formed I must first produce • certificate of his death. I was at BriOton, and I wrote to Oman respecting it, and I asked Lim to fill up • printed form. He afterwards said he had made it and eent it, certifying that he knew Ridley to be dead. (The fabricated certificate of Identifi cation in which he stated he knew him before his death.) He knew him after death, and followed him to his grave. The Lord Chief Justice—Did the company pay 1,0001. Mr. Serjeant Parry—Yes. The Lord Chief Judico—Because most of the offices have a clause against suicide. once saw Hermansen in London and Brighton, but he did not stay with me. When I was at Brighton I received a letter from him from the prison at Hastings. I never associated with him in England. I showed the letter to Osman, who was at Brighton at the time, and I afterwards saw Hermarusen in Hastings gaol, and also Mr.Glenisten, the superintendent of-the Hasbngs police. I did not offer to supply funds for Hermansan'e defence. Gleniden, when examined at Brussels, did not Pay that I bad offered to supply the funds. Hennansan was tried and convicted for robbing • friend of mine at an hotel. After hie conviction I received a communica tion from his wife asking me to go and see him, acid I did so. She was the daughter of Varstraaten. I never saw him afterwards. In December of that year the China Steam Company made a call for sharer, and Mr. Kimber advised me to pay . it. He said if a friend called on him, he might save the mitered and the lawyer's expenses. Osman offered to settle it for me. I obtained a checque for 2501. from my agents (Messrs. Abbey Bros.), payable at Messrs. Roberts", which I gave to Osman to offer at once to settle without expenses, and take a receipt for it. He us to meet me at the Royal Ex cheese. He came back and said be could not see the se cretary. I asked him to remain and arrange it for me before three o'clock, at which hour I would call on him, and if he bad not arranged it, I would go to the banker and pay the cheque and interest. He was enable to settle it, end I paid the call and interest by cheque. I know nothing personally of the attempted fraud - by Osman on Messrs. Roberts and Co. His oommumeaticam with Mews. Abbey have continued up to this time, and ono a 1 the partners came to Brussels and gave evidence in my favour. They never believed in any complicity with him. I afterwards went to Paris. I had promoted • company for the establialiment of flour mills at Beyrout. Messrs. Kimber and Ellis were to be the attorneys, and Osman the secretary. In January Omen joined me in Paris, but before this he had gone to Spa to settle Ridley's debts. At this time I received the 1.000 insurance. I stopped at the Grand Hotel, and Oman in the Rue Castigltone. On the 29th January I lost my pocket book. I have not been able to get any documents from Brussels since the commencement of this trial. The Lord Chief Justice said he should have thought they could have been obtained through the intervention of her Majeety's government. Plaintiff said he had done his best to get them, but without suceees. Mr. Baker Greene said an attempt had boon made to get than through Lord Stanley, but without sumac The Procureur-General refused him (Mr. Baker Greene) 'to have any of the documents. Mr. Serjeent Parry said photographs of the documents had been allowed the other lido, but refused to the plain- plaintiff hoped his lordship would write for them. The Lord Chief Justioe said that if her Majesty's government had fulled to obtain them it would be useless for him to to for them. All he should have been asked for was to entrust the docu ments to some one to produos in court. If we had got him here with the documents we could get them out of him. (Some delay was caused in consequence of a slight misunderstanding between the learned counsel on thisEilst.) The tifs examination in chief ocespisd the whole a the y, sad MA aci esatisied Was gis wart raw COURT OF COMMON FLEAR.—JumE 15. Sittings at Nlei Prim, in Middlesex.—(Before Lord Chief Justice Sevin ens) a Special Jury.) ILLS a ILLITNCRT. Nomrs 'fili 7te cua recover action dmagem aipaist th i, : r pr i od e r l i m eto p r ub o li f s t i e li n na t itr iit h paper. The defendant pleaded in pi/Ur-Mimi that the airlibels were tree. Quain, ac, and Mr. Francis appeased for the Oaintiff ; and Mr. M. I:bombers, Q.C., and Mr. Joyce for film defended. The Osintiff masa clerk in the War-office ; he had been siouneeW with the Civil Service Co-operative Association, and he and some other gentlemen started a similar a,s,cs iatieua at Lewisham. In Augast last they pub lished a circular, u which they stated thut the stores had been eatabfiabed to supply the public with articles of consumption at the lowest possible price, and they also stated Mar the association was register ed wider the lith and 26th Viet., cap. 87. The transaction now in question commenced by Dr. Shute writing to the Kentish .Allereury in reference to his retirement from the association. Upon this circumstance 110111 e wm meats were made in the paper, and it wan stated that the West Kent Supply Association wee so daring and desperate an attack on the interests of shopkeepers in the district that the editor proposed going fully into the matter in his next number. In accordance with this pro mise the defendant ppuublished an article in which it was stated, "Frona circular that has come to our possession, which will be reprinted in theme columns as a portion of the text of our commentary, it appears that the gentlemen who have formed themselves into an association for selling tea, sugar, treacle, butter, bacon, short sixteens, rushlights, and lollypop! at cost price, have quarrelled with their head shopkeeper, Mr. B. J. E Annegarn, who has in con sequence let the cat out of the bag. Ile explains that Mr. Johnstone and his three cost-price' colleagues in the direction—Mr. John Keen, clerk in the War-o ffi ce depart ment; Mr. J. D. F. Farrell, clerk in the Royal Arsenal ; and Mr. F. Miles, of Lewisham, another civil servant— have secured for themselves 60/. each for the first year as directors' remuneration, the remaining pro fi ts in on their sake on ` met-price' principles to be divid share and share alike between the Said four clerks in her Majesty's service and the aforesaid B. J. E. Annegarn, in .he service of themselves. We should be curious to know what reply these clerks will have to make to the respective heads of departments if they should be asked, as we fully expect they will be, when they and other public servants who are engaged in these Supply Associations have suc ceeded in ruining the poor shopkeepers who, as tax payer help to provide for the payment of your salaries ; What p Mon do you propose shou ld he made for repair ing she d e ficiency in the national receipts which your grovelling views and grasping propeditiss have occa sioned Y"The next publication complained of was a hand bill headed " Amateur Shopkeepers," and which stated that in the next paper would be published an account of the association, with "some commentary on the pernicious combination of government clerks calling themselves directors, but who are in reality nothing more than a body of traders endeavouring to cajole the public and destroy their fellow-shopkeepors." The next arti cle complained of stated that so far from the asso cintiuu selling at wholesale prices, they had charged for 40 yards of chintz 1-9th more than the wholesale price, and that the association was deacrilml as a "limited!" one, when it had not been registered as such ; and it was suggested that the heads of departments should inquire " into the mischievous tendency of allowing their clerks to become retail shopkeepers, and whether any of them have deceptively published themselves as a limited liability company, to the discredit of the public servi, and the injury of the toiling classes of her Ma jesty's subjects, and finally to solicit the heads of de partments to ascertain by examination of the clerks en gaged in such trading operations whether they have in any instance drawn any portion of their trading stock from the stores of government contractors." The plaintiff and the other directors were called, and they denied the truth of most of the statement mule in the defendant's paper, and in particular they denied that they were to receive any money from the associations • and that any charge beyond the sum paid to the wholesale house had been charged for the 40 yards of chintz. It appeared that the association was not registered when it started, but was soon afterwards. Mr. Annegarn gave evidence for the defendant, to the effect that the statements which had been made in the paper were true. In particular, he said the directors were to have 601. each, and that the balance of the profit was to be divided among them and him. He also said that many of the goods at the store were supplied by a govern ment contractor. _ . . The plaintiff wu recalled, and said that he did not know that the person who had supplied the grvxls in question was a government contractor. In the depart ment of the War-office in which he was, they had no thing to do with contractors or contracts. His Lordship left it to the jury to say whether the articles complained of were fair comments upon a matter of public interest; and, if not, they would then consider whether the defendant had made out his plea that the statements complained of were true. The plaintiff would be entitled to a verdict only upon the jury finding in his favour upon both these te The jury, after cord ering the matter for 20 minutes, found a verdict for the plaintiff—damages, 101. His lordship granted a certificate for costs. TIONE TEACHING FOR THE BuND.—Yesterday the anniversary meetingof the society for this object, inconnec tion with which is the Alexandria Institute for training and employing the blind, was held at Willis's-rooms, Colonel Itowlandicu occupied the chair. A somewhat novel feature at these meetings, and one that by no means detracts from their interest, is that the majority of the audience are those whose afflictions and necessities have brought them within the scope of the society's operations, the " visitors" being confined to the centre seats; and amongst them were ob viously yesterday many of the relatives and psrsonal friends of those who had been benefited by one or other of the affiliated societies. The object of the Home Teaching Society is to teach the blind to read by means of an ingenious system of raised letters, the foam of which can be felt with the fingers. It also pro- vides free lending libraries of books printed in this raised INDIGENT BLIND VISITING SOCIETY. —The annual meeting of this society was held yesterday afternoon, at the Freemasons' Tavern, under the preailemcz of Lord Ebury. Its object is to ameliorate the condition of the destitute blind resident in London and its vicinity, by providing them with readers of the Scriptures at their own homes; with conductors, when needed, to take them to church and to the classes established by the society; and by instruction in reading the embalmed characters, to invented by the late Mr. James Halley Frere. tknooLa OF ART.—The Lords of the Committee of Council on Education offered to every teacher of art schools visiting the Paris Exhibition the sum of dl. in aid of his or her expenses, and an additional sum of 2/. for any one report which any such teacher might make, or any useful suggestions in respect to his or her duties or teaching derived from the study of the exhibition. The exhibition was visited by 101 art teachers, of whom 28 made reports amoved by their lordships. The first prize has been awarded to Mr. W. J. Mue.kley head master of the Manchester School of Art ; the second to Mr. Walter Smith, head master of the Leeds School of Art; and the third to Mr. Dewar Campbell, master of the Bridport and Dorchester Schools of Art. --- TnE Blx.wiNonAlt HORDE AND HOUND Snow. —This popular exhibition, which is announced to be held in Bingloy-hall, Birmingham, on the 'arc!, 24th, 2.ith, and 26th instant, bids fair to be even more attractive than in former years. The entriee, which show an increase in numbers, amount to upwards of 2.30,and will include many of the celebrities exhibited at the late show at Islington, amongst which may be named the winners of the mile trotting match and the piebald pony which was so admired by the Princess of Wales. A NEW STnEwr DANGER.—Mr. Payne, coroner, held an inquiry last evening at St. Bartholomew's Hos pital, relative to the death of a painter named Charles Stacey, mod 36, who was killed by the fall of a " cradle " suspended in front of a house. The deceased's family was represented by Mr. Mote, solicitor ; and Mr. Lewis appeared for Mr. Leyeber, the owner of the "cradle." It appeared that the deceased was employed on Thursday, the 28th May, in painting the front of No. 30, Noble-street, and he and another man stood in a cradle suspended from the fourth floor by means of ropes 16 feet long. The ropes broke, and the deceased was precipitated to the ground receiving fatal injunies. It appeared that the ropes ghat ean in use nearly six years, and Ur. Loyeter de weeda rope of that kind should last nine years. A practical men on the jury, however, dissented from this view, and said that the rope which broke was so rotten from age that the strands, indeed of supporting half • hundredweight, gave way under the pressure of a pound. The danger eonesqiiint upon the use of ouch ropes °m anned not only the men in the cradles, but the public walking on the pavement underneath. The jury returned a verdict of "Accidental death," and added that there was great neglect on the part of the master in not provid ing_proper ropes. BI7ILDING GRANTS FOR SCIENCE Scuola.—The Committee of Council on Education will be prepared to make grants towards the building of schools of science at the late of 24. 6d. per square foot of internal area, up to a mazmaum of 600 E, for any one school on condition that the school be built under the Public Libraries Acts (13 and 14 Pic., c. 86; 18 and 19 Vic., c. 70; 29 and 86 Vie., C. 114) ; or be established in connection with a school of art aided by . a department building grant ; and that the terms of the minute of the 19th Deoeniber, 1866 (No. 603) relat ing to building grants for schools of art, so far as appli cable to schools of science, be complied with. DYSPEPSIA, CONSUMPTION, &C., CURED BY Dl7 EA ITT'S lINTALDIITA ADADTTA FOOD TO TDB Siresaes, sorer. lIDDS. end INN of fl r i k ia l ins aang.and ming. without medicine or ex. Er igm "- - I. 7 .6.4, 4 p=itt la dosiV u deNtigi to .7 e a s es =tell f"" ansaWay euma == of WI }foli ages the Pope. It eaves IWO Wen its Net in caber . remedlee— The. IN. le ad.; Me.. Ise ; toe, or pd. par Neel Also the IIIODDIDD Chocolate Pander, sere etreapthenint Ulm .'onoen tested beef.—Da Duty end 00., 17. Reaen=asoni ,, London; also Pertness and Mason end at el. %ocean AMA; 4, Cheep. aids : O and ISO. Oailaa aaat—(Adv'sikleartl Mrs. S. A. Allen's World's Hair Restorer or = ea lliCT: r b ta r tDeak = l ore raiz fed Iket n tat: rpota It win promote Nutrient re k lam &NUN eelni. • Ibis Mk Wakened. Ikeldsatioretonted. It rej= " l4Ze ri Zero sad fra n i e t t " a n ake gamble. Ili =be el I= ata 41 Le I d ma = e i = l A l Its THE EXPRESS, TUESDAY EVENING, JUNE - 16, 1868. MARKETS. TATIMW, MONDAY MIIENING.—The dotting of contracts for June delivery produced aline lumoution to y market in the latter part of last rock, and un sul yam., , 4 .• bliabed on flaturday of Bd. per cwt. for thin 111.1 inst. F or to December delivery] there bar brit no chaotic. n„. for ermaiimption is wombed chiefly from Au.tralian tolow, in which dearriptirm, in conaeguence of the large gmuitity Friday, there wan a decline of Od. ha cwt. There an. now 1 14 ,, k , make afoot from Australia, 5,000 having boen shipixd tiros , la.t. advirea. him ten eery littlo to-day, and the market ClOO4Ol atently. Spot 1.47 40,, t!, 44a. 3d„• July to September, ; (Mtober to beteinb : r, December, 41e. We quote town tallow, tln. it,, no ..oh trahan mutton, 4211. to 42a. fld.; mixed melt, 414. 1"4 , 34, to 41... CA., down LllB4ll. for low greasy kinds. Wroth mutton, 45. a. 6d. Ilona Fereame, Otw. Coonanut oil- Ce,, au t[,; '..ylon, :/ M• ed. ; fine, 49, ;ll..; 4 , Cd. ; middling, 48e. to 47a. low, d.,iro to 41, 1•.:11. 01l qai, t MM. fine Lagos; Accra, Ma. to 7.1 i- Isom the Circul ar of 1t„„,,. Smith and Chalk.. COTTON.—LIVRAPOOL, JUNI! 15.-3 f on, inquiry, at iii z o., n l x , y ,., priria. twee 10,000 bat. s ; 2,00 :met port. 6,11 m American, gfd. to 111 d, ; Prmain, Ild.; 700 ]Panic and Bahia, to 12d.; :itio star i _ x i„l„ Ild. ; 900 Egyptian, 10Id. to tad. ; 50t5nyrna, 0 !. to spl ! 150 Peru, 11'd. to Its ; Surat, 71d. to U.I . ; Beinde, kr., 741. to aid.; Fair ; Fair 9d.; Fair Bltbaril, ; Fair ; Fair Fair Pernam, I Id. ; M dhGrg how iii, told. ; 114 d. carrox 'mob& HERTEN, .11,1! 15.—A 10::.. 'knitter. in cotton at I.iverpool, wit II initill!intt i,.• TOIT 110., haw failed to Online any erirn.utoreling Inovrno day in either yarn nr cloth, and we hare a dull tnarke t. can be done at a prior, but .p enter' and inanuf:a.t.,...,..tdi cline the low offent tendered, exerpt in a fen/ InKtit 1.44 y. n 4ln perm., to nr . ln•Ve then - incl. - a ni .trek. M. 44.11 to. ~n hiss' been curtailed through few , r bran of lahour :„ great number of mills, the supply an/Kara dill in adtuu. •.... demand. WOOL. AND WORSTED.- PR 11.FORR, Jeer 15. A f,,ir ~unnt ity of wool ban changed hand,. to.clay. hut the punt,.,-- e .,.1., are, an a rule, almond, exelurivelv to otimoly the isuinedna.. of the epinner. Pura*. an. 11,11)1,110.,11. Mor-R,R. 1.01/j4 wool broken., held n tale of Falgtinh wont the. afternn , 41, Ip,, to the varintu. ,411 en elsewhere, and many iroul4taplow• LL.ol MT. being in th,• euuntiy, the anemia..., or hop, thin, and the lUddium. were eorrt-npondinrly ntantlblic the lota offered included wane prime Wool. N,t Lorimer; has been done to-day in %meted yarn.. ever, are well under contract, awl priors un• ronor To rained. Twofold-y*l7m, from NeR up•ntryls, rontiwo dtmand. In prices, the - market in quiet, but prices kw hemming dram. There 1 4 a pteady . the variant "ontinental market", and the eort,,,. • • home me is of an average diameter. NORM OF ENGLAND IRON AND COAL T! MIDDI.EI7.IIrt:W. Jrar 15.—The North of England um. ;• on the whole he reporikd an rutin? mar rmunuryting Th. r. at. lady and nil , trade in Cleveland t 0;,,,. T. return. for the month, no far an these have love pm l .lel 1 . an inewawil eonaumption of between s,iliko and i;,opoi , .peaka highly fur the i-eunilin aiwt, bade of the dixtriet, when the thiliew. of the in. llt t taken into account. Prime however are running low. h on the decline for many week. pied, until they lei,. _ . the point where they Bond when the epward mar, metoa 1.1 in the early part of the year. The official air, have been at a nominal figure fnr nome two nr thi.e are now !put upon a par with maker"' pews,quoted at for No. I, 465. 9.1.; No. 1, 4.1-.; 4, 4 . .1 . ... manufacturers have lately been doing a or, tr i .i.. in Cleveland piga, which are intreaaing in foeur Scottish bourn. Pig iron warrant, are dull, and are Teti it •.. day at Middleabrough Exchange at 43a. 9d. Some of the t.,,,.. driest are doing more in pilaw and railway chairs. T 1,.. North( rn order for the latter elms of Unit has just Urea li n o,' ,; Stockton. rail milli, are dill pretty busy, and their , gei•ool.t. - liveries ronstantly being made for export, chilly to the Continent. Some few inquiries are afloat foe ibisean Atrieriean account. Shipbuilding is tailor baler; a fur a steamer was given out in the Tem during the present Par iron remains tuachangcd. Engine ring and bridge Incubi appear to be rather stark. i'col and coke an- dill demand. The shipments from Northumberland oral Eat. during the part month show a row-alembic fall.: • 1. There is great competition unuitipt ...item, and priers nn. down to the lowest point. The supt 4 per rail to Loudon dw ; the week has been rather in exems of the week previous. coror.—It..THERRA/I, hi.— The supply of wheat we. lant'...l, and there was only a moderate att. ralunee. White r 1144114. 70:- • Ha.; red, 71a. to 776. per 36 stone. 144,141 w:,.+ mune and ,11.- alttred in salue. Demand for tuts steady, and prie,-. n•main..l as last week. Beans a small show, and forms rates were wail.. Hain is now much wanted in this neighbourhood fur all kinds ul grain. 61..sarntn, SURE 15.—We had a seasonable show of wheat at market to-din, and a 1,.11.n.1.1...1. uunvi win cNik•ricnetvl at a rive of la. to to. per qr. White, 7t+. to ifn ;n P . ttsbc. to irw. per :0; atone. Hires for barley *ere ittoiatuilly mattered, and ratua.l from 39a. to 45e. per qr. titter arlitlk, about the Now, On; , , 3,h. to 36a. ; beams fila. to 54a. ; pea., few. to 52a. per yr. CATTLE.--Trrstroni., Jc‘r. 15.--The supply of rattly marlot rout lees, of Pheer and lamb about the rani , a 4 no lirtvious 'Monday. Tho d. 'wool for rattle Amy, .t. prices. tiheep and lambs sold dull, and rneei murk lon. T. COAT..- Tanciani, Je.e. 17, Thistini,, iTarfley, Molywell Main, if*. ; West cal.; }:den Multi, 1.. 61.; Walls End Bruddyll's 1:. Walls End Dairwell,l6, 6d.: Wall, End lletton, End Hilton ',lens, Ist. 9.1. ; Walls End Oriirimil 11.. ed. ; Walls End Tama:ill, ; Walls 111..1 - Od. ; Wall. End Lud Barth-pool. 1 1 * , ; Wall. End 1 11.“-J Hartlepool, till.—bliipe at tnarktt, :H; sold, Jo. TRAFFIC RETUItNti. RAILW•TS. Miles Pas- Ifer- Tge.ll, %11, Open. seng , ers. chavolise. re;. Week ending April 19 E f f East Indian Week ending May 13. Northern of Canada .... Watt ending May 2d. Detroit and Milusukie Week ending June 12. Great Western of Canada. 549/ “ 97 590 2,450 3:4, - I ISIS Week ending June 13. Laud.,Brightan,k b.Coust nit IS4,FAR 6,114 r 4.•- • -.! *r Bent h Ea.:ern . . Atlantic and limit Weatern traffic nssupt- fur ..•' u• May, S. 88,300; corresponding will last year, Sitio...-. • Exhibition in Paris and Wbiteun Week. • CRYSTAL PALACE.-7 S. 6D., Flit D. Y. MONDAY, JUNE M.—Admission by season ticket', ; ditto by payment, 11,920; total miter. 4, 19.217. DE. IIE JONGIL'iI LIDIiT-Bittia*N Cuu 1.! v cu. all the recognised remedies fur elne,t affe•tiete• eerie ce so efficacious as this unrivalled proparotiun.. Dr. ll . sedb)• Plc 4- den to the Hertford Infirmary, writes Net I,111) w wy own care, but in many others I hare seen, Dr. de lonclie Oil he. ...wed an improvement of chart symptoms. and an ne resee ee•icht, au PPM and en lastingly as to be quite io ly the moat valuable remedy we peewee for el,e•m. disease." Sold only in ospeided imperial 1 Is. fel. s ;anarts, ?.. , by all eh.flliMA. Sok Ato,l, f°l4l• a 11 . 8121 ". Dondon.—iAdvertmenent BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTH.S. ASTONT-June 13,_ . at Clatoivlou-n.l, wife of 1). Arton, Eat., of a :on. 10-INNETT.—June 12, at 141ar...g.adyn.s-tetraco. Mr. J of a ann. BACON-June 14, at No. &9, r-feretee, wife of William Naeltinurdo al L HOLF0111).-June lt, the wife of W. T. llahurd, 1 , 1. el I" Moon-atrect, Piccadilly of a daughtAr. JAIIES.-June 14, the wife of Major-General 11..Tair JOHN.-Tune 13, at The Avenue, et. MansAret*-, Twe 64 the wife of E. Jahn Feu., at a HERR.- June If, at Jahn, 14 4 N. 8., hely Vi ...... of a daughter. Itat'LL.- June 13, at Deronshim-i , luee, W., the FAQ, 11.1'., of a daughter. 613 f MON.- : June 13,at (la% on z at met , wife of 3. Simpeon,laq.. of a won. 14, at lireen.street, tho L.cly . of a atm. Viltk.V.— lune IJ, at Sprinolidd-road, St. J01an , ...a.“ 1 , s of B. P. Viret, Esq., of a •am. WlGA2i.—June 13, at Evendey, Windononr-1011, 11. Wigan, Log.. of a son. MARRIACF.S. ARYMAR-STANDROUGH.- June 13, at R. T equate, by the Rev. F. R. Harford, Capbdu r..1.0••••`'• to Sarah Rosalie. widow of the late W. Stanbrouvit CIifAMBERS- PENNET.--June 13, at the roveh don,h St. Bray, Stoke Neningtou, by the Ow T ?A.A., prebendary of SC Paul's, W. H. Gould-sr, D.A . , •1• -- intendant of &raw H.3l.'n Mtlitutry Warr Stuff, Tow t• luaus Marl Clifford, youngeat daughter of t'. J. Penn. y, ty . of Commbury. DIONUM. -HOME.-June 13, at the church of St. R• 14 ,..; Westbnornc-parii, by the Her. Ralph cnclunr, by the Rev. Harvey Brooks, incumbent., Forb•-• 14' h.u•" only surriaing mu of the late Audios Urshan 11 J am, Nailer to thanocry of the Wand of J:unnica, PAN daughter of the late George lone, ga ff aunPit PAINE-ENTSON---June 13, at St. Clement Dane+, Mr. Charles diming. Paine to Christiania Nana berms, to'. of Baddingtort. PHILLITB-14HAW-June 11, at the pariah rhinvh, Rol•oh inh by the Rev. J. F. Kitt°, Jamea, erai of .7. S. TI•illipo, PuR W. f; aluare, Lowden, to Emily Ann Lokett, daughter ei ff. Shaw, of Shirley-hounedieckenham. RAYNES-111-ACE.-June 13, at Holy 'Trinity Chung', R T.out tan, by the Rev. W. Rayner, brother of the kidoll'o °o4 Rayne., of Perry-hill, eydenhan, young son of thc F.J. W. Baynes, of RipeOlootex, to Emilie Elisabeth, of Dr. J. R. E. c, of Sumner-place, Bromeon. WILLETT-BANSELL-Jue li, at the Couch of St. V. i t lakenham, Norwich, by the Rev. F. Neyrick, eon of E. Willett, Esq., of Thome, to Emily lkrtha, dauebt of H. llanacli, Esq., of The Clow, :gonna• ealy aaaght,r . =VAIL—Jane 12, at DEATHS T o rt en h,..4 xiddkoes, r. " 14 aired 84. cubwia.—June IS, at Ealing, Middlesex, C. E. (Ix)wile.E.l.' M.R.C.8., und 64. roe d COM .MON use 7, at Margate, Alfred , the r U “s d i... John UAW:in, Eno., of the Admio,ilty, a nd Coin ,erfoll , . GALILICE—June 12, at Stork Grehard -villas ' Bobcat, daughter of the late S. Galilee. Esq., aged 76._,,, J . P. GIBEINS.—June IS, at Morningtonsroad, RegeaP.' Gibing, agid 79. the Bei. RAMPSON.—June 8, at Borrowthde Hotel, Keswic k ' W. 8. 8. Hammon, rector of Soubton, 1-incolnehire, l'eur'., 'riving eon of the late Sir (Worse Hampoon, Bait ., ag" , ,t,,* ina:urro.—..T. 12, at Sydney, Mr. U. J. K 3 e;= , : e r ..". 0 , -N 2EI A:6/I.—June 18, at Ilaaetweter-etrae l , Hannah, widow of the late U. W. Kleah, are 88- ,, m u er:‘• fIAWYEII.—June IS, Mr. B. Sawyer, of (hurt, aged 8& art irrEvrtoL—June 13, 36. Eller , Ee.q., of Benwell-rold. ..,.. WV ""hill - Perk, N., and Mythlellau-Ante, (lett , ocil. ' 48. . B' j• - T.—Jima It, at Torquay, Ws, daughter of the Lde R. J. Watt. if /NOROVE—June 12, at Southend Howe, .^ es...•.4,eshA,' ..4, baba* the wife of fund W. Wingrure, EN-, en--- :4 X411 Prieto& sad Published W Witu•x Rico intike City et Loam, _qa te histi - Is the Prided gg bill:W - 1i - 10 7 11 - 61MdWil TVIBIDAY, Jras le, UM 1~ r` 1 11