The Express. — London, England, 1863-06-10 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT• HOME OF LORDB.—TU4SDAY, JUNN 9. The Lose atheenues took kis meet on the wooinek et toe o'clock. PRIVATE BUSINESS. The following bills were reed • third time and : The ILanellester Corporatioe Wator Loudon, Til= d and Southend Railway ; Dublin Corporation Water ; Frog more Embankment; Knightos and deatral Wales Railway; SAW the Central Wales Extension Railway. THE SLAVE TRADE. Lord STRATHEDEN inquired when the reports relative to the slave trade which bad been distributed among mem bers of the other house would be received by their lord ships. Earl I fIELL replied that these papers were very voluounotia. and were not oonsidered to be of sufficient in. tared to incur the expenre of reprinting them for their lord shape' use. Any noble lord, however, could obtain a copy by applying for them. GREECE. Earl RUSSELL hid upon the table papers relatiag to the affairs of Greece. SECURITY FROM VIOLENCE BILL. The Earl of CARNARVON moved the secood reading of the Security from Violence Bill, seat up from the Commons, and the object of which, be reminded their lordships, was to indict corporal punishment upoo persons guilty of those attacks upon the person which were known by the popular term of garotting. Lord CRANWORTH, in proposing as AD amendment the wood reading of tie bill that day three months, condemned it as a retrograde measure that would do much more harm than good. It was also unnecessary, and had resulted from I • panic in the public mind, which bad now wholly passed away, and which showed clearly that the existing penalties ten amply suflicieet Earl (ALAN VILLE supported the amendment, for he could not approve of the hill, although it bad been passed by the other bows with tarp majorit ies ; but looking at the crowded state of the opposition benches he thought it would be useless to persist In opposing it further. The Earl of HARDWICKE pointed out that if the shape and size of the inetrument of punishment were not defined iu the bill, it might be made either unnecessarily severe or else a mere harmless form. The Earl of HARROWBY said that the instruments of punishment were all made after • uniform pattern, which was sent down from the Homooffioe, and be was informed by the governor of his county gaol that it was never noose eery to use it twice on the same preoper. Lord CRAM WORTH withdrew his amendment, and the WI was read a second time. DUCHY OF CORNWALL MANAGEMENT RILL, The report of the Duchy of Cornwall Management Bill led toe keg discussion, but eventually the debate was ad inroad till Friday. VACCINATION (IRELAND) BILL. This bill pared through committee. Their lordahipa adjourned at five minute, put 7 o'clock. ROUSE OF COMMONS.—TUNIDAY, Rum 9. The &mum took the chair at 4 o'clock. NOTICES OF MOTION. Mr. FERRAND gays notice of his intention on Thurs day next to ask the Secretor, of State for the Horne De parent whether he intends to bring in a bill this session no limit the hours of labour of children employed in pot teries' and paper tube factories. Lord J. MANNERS gave notice, on behalf of his bon. friend the member for Honiton, that on Tuesday, the 7th of July, his hon. friend would moves resolution to the effect that the large sum a:Fended on public buildings is not fa • satisfactory manner, and that it in desirable Ciett in e office of the i.:ommissioner of Works should be placed on a more permanent basis. TURNPIKE ROADS. Sir B. LEIGHTON asked the Secretary of State for the BMW Department whether the power of justices to order a contribution in aid of turnpike roads, where the funds of the turnpike trust were insufficient, continued in districts in which the new Highway Act, ai and 26 Vic., c. 61, bad been adapted ; and, if so, on whom the order was to be made, and how the amount was to be recovered. Sir G. GREY said he believed the justices bad the power of making the onler, but at the rains time be should be sorry to give a positive opinion, as it depended on the out. 'traction of an act of Parliament. SIEGE OF PUEBLA. Mr. B. LONG asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if thestatement of JameeL. Hart was corset: " The Vice.Coaaula of the United States of America sad of Prussia have retired from the French camp" (at Puebla), "and have been imsucousful in their mission in siting that the women and children might be allowed to leave the beleaguered city ;" and whether any representa tive of Great Britain took part in such mission or remon strance. Mr. LA YARD said he knew nothing of the statement of Yr. Rat, end her Majesty's government had no information an the subject. THE SEIZURE OF A FRENCH VESSEL BY HER MAJESTY'S SHIP ZEBRA. Mr. ADDINGTON salted the Secretary to the Admiralty whether any offieisl istelligence bad been received of the cir cumstances under which a French vessel, recently detained by her Majesty's ship Zebra on the west meat of Africa, on suspicion of th ing engaged in the slavetrade, refused to show say papers authorising her to hoist the French flu, and wee subsequently liberated by the prize court at Sierra Lemke ; and w nether the decision of the prize court would involve the officer in command of her Majesty's ship Zebra in any de mead for compensation for the capture and detention of Use inspected slaver. Ind C. PAGET maid the Admiralty had received official intelligence of the detention of a French vessel by her Majesty's ship Zebra, under tae following circnrestsnom. The Zebra, in February leaf, was at anchor in the Congo river, when the captain saw a suspicioaolooking vessel, and made usual to her to show her colours. The vessel did not do so, whereupon the Zebra got under weigh and chased her, and tired a shot across her bows. The veinal then showed French colours, and hove to. The English oMoer bearded Ler, and (row the appearance of the vessel inside and the state of her equipment., and likewise her crew, the officer thought she had the appearance of being engaged in the slave trade. The captain of the vessel declined alto gether to show his papers. The captain of the Zebra there upon took the vessel in tow, with a view of communicating with a French man-of-war which he expected to fall in with on that part of the coast ; but several days Utter scud, sad he reiterated his demand to the captain to show his paper, aLd to state what his business was. The captain declined, And thereupon the captain of the Zebra sent the French vessel and crew to Sierra Leone, to be adjudicated tepee in the Admiralty Court there. Three days after she arrived the trial took place, and the French consul at Sierra Leone brought into court the papers, showing the vessel to be a French vessel, upon which she was liberated by the court. There eau no written apology by the Freach consul, but the captain of the Zebra stated in his report that the French consul apologised for Use behaviour of the cap tain of the French vessel in not showing his papers when demanded so to do. In regard to the second part of the boa. gentleman's question, no demand for compensation had be presented to ha- Majesty's government. THE TELEGRAPHIC CABLE BETWEEN MALTA AND ALEXANDRIA. Sir W. GALLWEY asked the Secretary to the Treasury if he would lay upon Use table of the house a return of all laoaies voted by parliament or contributed from the Indian gonceent for nuking, transporting from this country, and baying the cable now working between Malta and Alexan dria, with a detail of all payments nude to Messrs. Glass and Elliott relative to this cable previous to its being opened to the pul,lic ; also a copy of the lease to Messrs. Glass and Elliott, by whom this line is worked, with the gross retaiits ADC* such lease was granted. Mr. F. FEEL said there would be no objection to giving these returns. There was no vote for the line except a small run. of 200/.. the salary of the officer employed on the part of the government to check the °Detractors. SEA FISHERIES OF IRELAND. Sir E. GROGAN asked the President of the Board of Trade if the royal commiesioners of inquiry about to be ap pointed would inquire into the sea fisheries of Ireland! Mr. GIBBON said it was the opinion of the government that it would he desirable that the committee about to be lappoi ntrelau ed should inquire into thew fishing of the coast of THE IRISH FISHERIES BILL. Is answer to Colonel - Sir It PEEL said he propceed to take this billet a morn. frig sitting ma Friday sett. THE EXHIBITION BUILDING. Lord ELCHO salted the First Commissioner of Works whether way surveyhad beep made by a competent surveyor of the pretest state of the Exhibitiog building of 1862. mad H so, whether he would lay such survey on the table before say vote for the purchase of the building was brought leeward! Mr. COWPER said the building had been carefully stir. veyed by Mr. Huet , the sur ve y or o f the Office of Works, sad the estimate which he formed of the building ea the , malt of thou ioquiries was moved for lut night and weak; be promoted to-morrow morning, sad would at once be placed is the bands of members. Lord ELCHO said his question referred to the report of the surveyor, whether he had made. report to the govern ment, sad whether his right hon. friend would lay that re port before parbiunent. Mr. COWPER replied that he could not my at that moment whether there was any document to existence which would convey the opinion of the surveyor to the Doe. He knew that the surveyor had formed an opinion, bet he was unable to answer the question as to the pre sentative of the report till to-morrow. PAROCHIAL AUTHORITIES AND THE CASUAL POOR. Viseoent IiAYNHAN Lksdilis Presideot of the Poor law Board whether paroddsl authorities bad power to Wets at as time the adnaissioo into workhouses of persons who applied for relief as casual poor. Yr. VILLIERS amid by bow every promo who was really driitute mu entitled to relief upon application, sod the aesprowilitlity of making arrangentimits for affording that TH E tarICEAS, WEIR_ ESIDAN 1 -1 V EN , JUNE. 10, 1863. —•— relief rested oo the guardians of the oak m, Co the officers of the parish where the destitution oocurred. The fact of the workhouse being full on auy particular oecasioa did not re lieve the authorities from that responsibility. The com plaint which the doble lord bad made of the refusal to re ceive a destitute pence into the Marylebone workhouse had been received by the Poor-law Board, and directions had bee. given to make inquiriee respecting it. THE SUBSCRIPTION TO THE THIRTY-NINE ARTICLES AND THE PRAYER-BOOK. - - - •• • • Mr. BUXTON moved a resolution that the subscription required from the clergy to the thirty-nine articles, and to the Prayer-book, ought to be relaxed. Th e mot ion, he said, was not brought forward in a spirit hostile to the church of England. The question was whether the Math lion of the subscription would injure or benefit the church, sad he cited the opinions of clergymen in favour of the change. Not representing any school of the church, his main object was to relieve the clergy from what many of them felt to be a grievous burtlen. He had the highest respect for the Prayer-book, but it contained some things to which reasonable men might conscientiously be unwilling to give their unfeigned assent and consent, and even in the thirty-nine articles there were expressions that had created great controversy and dissension ; it was only to the essential fundamental doctrines of the church that a general assent could be expected, and if subscription were done away it would be understood that nothing more was required than a general conformity to those fundamental doctrines. He discumed the objections which he anticipated to his resolution, and, denying that the proposed change could be regarded as revolutionary, be suggested reams* why it would act as a safe and salutary measure of reform, which would restore to the church the liberty it enjoyed in ' its most glorious days. He stated the great diminution of the numbers of graduates at Oxtord and Cambridge who came up for ordination, and he was assured, he said, that many persons were de barred from taking orders solely by the necessity of subscription. The motion was seconded by Mr. G. DUFF. Mr. M. MILNE. moved an amendment, limiting the resolution to the subscription to the Prayer-book. He did not see, he said, that the taking away subscription to the articles of the church of England would in any degree extend the spirit of toleration. The articles were the law of the church, and taking away subscription to them would, in a great degree, impair the validity of that law, and establish an unwritten law—that of public opinion. The articles admitted of large interpretation by judicial minds which would not be actuated by • spirit ,of persecution. His objection did not apply to the other part of the resolu tion, to which be gave his support. SW. GREY said he wished to take the earliest oppor tunity of stating the course which the government were prepared to take upon this important question. They were of opinion that it would be inexpedient for the home to give its assent either to the original motion or the amendment. At the same time it must not be inferred that the govern ment considered the law to be in a satisfactory state, and ought not to be altered, with due regard to the interests of the church. Mr. Buxton proposed that subscription "ought to be relaxed; " but neither be nor Mr. Mikes had specified to what extent the relaxation ought to be carried. He understood that Mr. Buxton was of opinion that all subscription should be abolished. After pointing oat cases where the existing law imposed, be thought, unnecessary borthens, and where it would be expedient to simplify it, he re marked that the resolution would tend to create uncer tainty, sod raise false expectations. change of th is kind should not be made without the most careful inquiry into the whole subject. He did not say how alterations were to be made, but a change would be inexpedient, more especially at the present time, without the fullest inquiry by men in whom the church had the fullest confidence. The course the government proposed to take upon the motion was—if the amendment were not pressed—to move the previous question. This would imply that they would not be unwilling to consider the question of sub scription so that the securities of the church might not be weakened. Mr. mn-vps thereupon withdrew his amendment. Sir G. GREY then moved the previous question—" that this question be now put." Mr. NEWDF.GATE expressed his regret that the govern ment had not taken a more decided course on this subject, for the motion of Mr. Buxton, if it were adopted, would impose on the laity the utmost latitude of teaching on the part of the clergy. For what were those subscrip tions but the security of the laity that when they went to church th should bear her doctrines faithfully pre ached If , then, a change ware contemplated, let it not be erred upon ras hly, ly, but with a view to all the difficul ties and dangers by which the church was surrounded. Mr. WALPOLE also complained of the embarrass ment in which the house was placed by the come pursued by the government. He contended that the exist ing law with regard to subscription had protected the people from the errors into which they would otherwise have fallen, and given them a religion as pure, tolerant, sad comprehensive as eternal truth itself. Truth and pesos were within the church of England. Let the house, then, not imperil the one or disturb the other by adopting the motion of the member for Maidstone. If, in moving the previous question, the intention was to negative the motion, whilst it kept open the question that no many good men had of late years raised, be thought the house would do well to give the government time and opportunity to con sider deliberately whether they were prepared to make soy proposition on the subject, and to resolve what that propo sition should be. Mr. Momiume supported the motion, which was opposed by Sir S. Norrecore, upon the ground of its vague and no satiatactory character. By doing away with the test which the present' subscriptions provided, they would shake the faith of congregations in the sincerity of their teachers, than which he could not imagine a greater evil. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER observed that these subscriptions had grown up slowly, from the time of the reformation downwards, through the real neces sities of the church ; sod that was a proof of the extreme gravity of the question, and a reason why, if the house were compelled to deal with it, they should do so upon principles, and with an object that was clear and definite. He justified the course which the government proposed to adopt, for no measure on the subject ought to originate with par liament, but should first pan through an ordeal elsewhere. Mr. HADFIELD and Mr. BUTLI/LJOENSTONK spoke in favour of the motion, and Mr. Larior against it. Mr. HENLEY wo uld have been batter satisfied bad the motion been met with a direct negative ; for guarded as was the speech of the Chancellor of the Exchequer it was appa rent from the remarks of the Home Secretary that the government were of opinion that there ought to be an alteration. Mr. H. SEYMOUR reminded the house that these tests were imposed at a time of great excitement and religious passion, and said that the present was a period when mode rate opinions prevailed, and was therefore peculiarly fitted for the removal of such tests. Lord R. CECIL believed that the objections which had been urged against subscription were really directed against the articles themselves. If subscriptions were abolished every penalty that now existed most be removed, the basis of the church widened, and its doors closed to none, for the days would have passed when they could no longer exclude the unitarian and the calvioist ; then nothing would be left but for each man to preach from the pulpit, not what the church told him, but precisely what he himself willed. Mr. DISRAELI could not agree that moving the previous question was the proper mode in which to encounter the motion, inasmuch as it gave au implied assent to the pro paition that them were grounds for comidering the subs ject. He disapproved of the course which bad been pur sued of cavilling at a word here and a phrase there in the terms of subscription ; but it was just as Tameable and quite as easy to except to the language of the bill of righte itself. If they would bane a church with a creed, articles, and formularies, they must also .have subscriptions, and some symbols of union among those who were in communion with that church. On the other band, if they had a church without creed or article., then they would have the most dangerous and pernicious isstitiitiou that ever yet existed in a country. He did not mean to say that the Prayer-book was perfect ; be believed it to be divine ; but it was also human. There might be blots in it, but he could not see, in the present state of things, that it oontaioed anything to justify the house in agreeing to the motion. Even if they were of opinion that the title-deeds of the church required to be revised, in however modified a manner, it did not appear to him that such an inquiry should be originated in either house of parliament. No doubt, whatever was decided upon must ultimately receive the parliamentary flat • but that judgment would be pronounced upon the general merits of the question, and would not enter into ecclesiastical details and differences of religious opinion. 11 it were mammy that the constitution of the country should be called into action, it was with the temporal heed of the church that all measures should emanate, and from which they should flow. A royal communion, therefore, was the only natural and proper authority by which any change io the articles or liturgy of the church could be brought under the censideratiou of parliament. Mr. BUXTON accepted the discussion as indieatiog that the queetioe wu Oat yet tufllcientlyylpe to be dealt with by the house, and °Dissented to withdrew his motion. The debate wu closed with • speech from Sir G. ; after which the "previous question" was put and agreed to without • division. jfrp.:.ROARD pF ADMIRALTY. Mr. DALGLISH mowed for a select committee to in quire into the cometitation of the Board of Admiralty and into the different departeneeta under the control of that board. The motion vas seconded by Mr. JACIBON and opposed by Mr. SCOURNELD, who pointed out the inutility of nomi nating a committee of the house to conduct such an in quiry. It the motion were sgreed to he did not believe it would lead to soy practical or satiefactory result. Mr. BENTINCK, though concurring in the objects which Kr. Dash& had in view, recommended that be should withdraw his motion, as at that late period of the session no good could be expected to accrue from inquiry. Lord C. PAGET, who had been twitted by Mr. Jackson with his zeal for Admiralty reform when out of offloe, and his opposition to it whet' in, maid that the subsequent in quiries, conducted by a committee of the house and a royal cconiniseioe, had satisfied him that, although there were de. foots is the naval administration, they lied been greatly exaggerated. He was prepared at any time to defend the acts of the department, which, he contended, had not ne glected its duty, bat had carried out to a very peat extent the recommendations that had been offered by the commis- Moo and committee before alluded to. On the motion of Sir H. WILLOUGHBY the debate was adjourned. MISAPPROPRIATION BY SERVANT, BILL. Mr. STANILAND obtained leave to brill in a bill to amend the l►w io certain met of misappropnation by es:- nude of the property of their mestere. THE LISBURN ELECTION. On the motion of Mr. Counra, the minutes of the evidence taken before the Lisburn Election Committee woe ordered to be laid before the home. SHEEP AND CATTLE (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill passed through committee. SUPPLY. Mr. STANSFELD hariag Treight up the report on supply, Sir J. ELPHINSTONE renewed his objection to any fur ther expenditure on the harbour of Alderney, and moved the adjournment of the debate. The motion was agreed to. IRELAND REVENUE BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed. The remaining orders were disposed of, and the house adjourned. IS WAS originally put to the court that Lieut.-Colonel Cal thorpe had, in a direct and distinct manner, beyond all dia rute,•impoted to Earl Oardiwn that his lordship bad been guilty of cowardice and negkiet, of duty, and that be had deliberately turned his hone round before the batteries and left the brigade he was in charge of to the mercy of the enemy. If Lieut.-Colooel talthorpe did not intend to make that charge, what would have been more simple for him to do than to have stated that fact, either before or after the rule had been moved, in so many and distinct words It was clear from his affidavit that he always did mean, and understood the words complained of to convey the meaning, that Earl Cardigan did not enter the battery, and the learned counsel quoted the language used in the three editions of the work in proof of that assertion ; and he further coateacied that Lieut.-Colonel Calthorpe had not met the charge in a manner to entitle him to the discharge of the rule. When Earl Cardigan denounced Lieutenant-Colonel Calthorpe's conduct as un worthy of a soldier and a gentleman, be had to complain of five or atz deliberate attacks upon him—with reference to the reoonnaisaanoe on the Dobruchcba, where he was charged with harassing his men sod the horses • the release of Russian prisoners ; that he was declared by a medical board unfit for service, ; and that the court martial was demanded with regard to the whole of them. Lieutenant-Colonel Calthorpe now retracted what he called his equivoraexpression with regard to the medical report, and by . .• partiall y retracted his attack on the charge on the Russian ttery. The language of the attack on the report of the military board was a direct attack on Earl Cardigan, and was proof of malice and a desire to hold his lordship up to public ridicule and contempt. The Lord Chief Justice rid no one could take it as ap plying to anything but %heat:ate of Lord Cardigan's health. The learneelcounselthen proceeded tocritically consider the statements contained in the various affidavits, and the changed position of the battery and the light cavalry brigade after the charge was made, and observed that Earl Cardigan for the first time became acquainted, by the reading of the affidavit, that an arrangement had been come to between Lieut-ColonelCalthorpe and Mr. Murray to cancel the last edition of the work. The learned counsel's remarks were based upon the affidavits read in support of the application of the rule, which were fully published at the time, and are no doubt fresh in the public recollection. At the close of the learned counsel's arguments the further hearing was adjourned. forgeries with a view to defraud the North Eastern Rail way Company of 6001.. worth of sleek. From the evideoce of Mr. Charles Saddler Chaßoner, a sharebroker, at Neweastle-oa-Tyne, it spewed that the prisoner was formerly in his employ as clerk. During that period witness received instruotmes from lar. James Oliver, of Kensington, to purchase 000 f. worth of shares in the North Eastern Railway Berwick stock, which he did. There were two coupons for 5001. and 1001. respectively, which were issued on the 27th February. It wee a knowledge of this transaction which had enabled the prisoner to commit the offence with which he was charged. He wrote, in the name of Oliver, to the Secretary of the North Eastern Railway Company, stating that he had changed his address from Keosington to 46, Woburn-place, and that he had io the hurry of removing lost or mislaid the certificateaof his stock. He wished, accordingly, to know if be could have duplicates on making • declaration to that effect before • justice of the peace. In reply be was re quested to look again for the missing certificates. He answered this by stating that he had done so, but without effect. Investigations were subsequently made, which re sulted in the discovery that Mr. Oliver had not changed his address or lost his stock, or written the letters bearing his name, but that they were forgeries. No defence wee offered, and the prisoner was committed tor trial SOUTHWARK. Helen Woo!deity, a decent looking, middle-aged female, was placed at the bar before Mr. Combs, charged with being drunk and falling off the platform of the Greenwich Railway Station, at London-bridge, thereby endangering her life. One of the ticket collectors in the employ of the South Eastern Railway Company said that on the arrival of the 9 o'clock train from Greenwich, on the previous night, and after the pamengers had all gtt out, he saw the prisoner leave one of the carriages and stagger about from one side of the platform to the other, and before he had an oppor tunity of reaching her she walked right off the platform, and fell scram the metals just es a train was about to leave the other side. He fortunately caught hold of her and pulled her on the platform just in time to save her life. She was very much frightened, but perceiving she was much under the influence of liquor be handed her over to one of their constables, who took her into custody. Mr. Combo (to the prisoner)— What have you got to say in answer to the charge? Prisoner—All I have to say, sir, I was not drunk. Mr. Comte—But the constable am you stagger about, and you fell off the platform. Beside', he swears you were under the influence of liquor. How came you to fall off the platform' Prisoner—Oh, sir, I hardly like to tell you. I wear a crinoline, and coming up in the train it got disarranged, and when I got on the platform unfortunately my toe got entangled in the steel, and I fell off the platform. (Laughter.) Mr. Combo—Have you got that crinoline on now' Prisoner—Yea ; but es soon as I get home I'll take it off, and never wear it again. (Laughter.) Mr. Combs—What are you' Defendant—l am a cook, and had been to Greenwich to see an old felloweervasf. If you'll let me go this time I'll never wear a crinoline again, sir. (Renewed laughter.) Mr. Combe—Well, you may go about your business now, and I trust for the future you will discontinue crinoline as well as drinking. You have had a narrow escape with your life, and ought to be thankful to the officer for saving you. The prisoner expressed her gratitude, and quickly tripped out of court holding up her crinoline. COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE. Jun 9. (Before the Judge Ordinary.) UAEMAR o. ILLEXAB. In this case the wife of Major Harman, the standard. bearer to her Majesty's Hoe. Company of Gentleman at Anna, had obtained, in July, 1856., a divorced mead et thorn, and the judge of the Consider, Court had awarded her alimony at the rate of 1601. &year out of a net income of 7261. Since then the respondent had attained a considerable addition to his faculties by the death of his brother ; and Dr. Spinks moved to increase the wife's alimony. Dr. Toes, Q.C., and Mr. Pritchard appeared contra. Sir C. Croswell reserved his declaim]. GILL V. GILL AND HOGG& - - -- • - • In this cue tl;marrisge oieaptainTill had been dis solved on account of his wife's adultery with Colonel Hone, of the Sod Grenadier Guards, to whom, it was alleged, she bad since been married. There had been one child of the union. By the marriage settlement, the petitioner's step father (Sir W. Maxwell) had bound himself to pay an annuity of 300/. to the petitioner, with remainder to hi widow, so long as she remained unmarried. Sir W. Max well also agreed that his executor should pay within 6months after Ms death the sum of 5,0001. to be disposed of accord ing to certain trade met forth in the indenture. The lads's father, Mr. James Sebright, bad also settled 5,0001. on the parties, over which his daughter had a power of ap pointment. Dr. Spinks now prayed the court to declare that the moneys should be held for the benefit of the parties who would have been entitled to them if the respondent had died on the 3rd of March last, the day on which the marriage via finally dissolved. Mr. Kerslake, Q.C., appeared for the respondent. Sir C. Cromwell reserved his judgment. FITZGERALD V. FITZGERALD. This wu a petition against Major Fitzgerald, for a disso lution on the ground of cruelty and adultery. There had been a correspondence between the parties, and Mr. Huddleston, Q.C., applied to the court to order the petitioner to give the respondent copies of the letters, which he alleged would afford him material asaistance in framing his defence. Sir U. Orgasm'll was of opinion that there was no pretenoo whatever for the motion, and rejected it accordingly. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. OLD COURT. (Before the Recorder.) Benjamin Everett, 42, a respectable-looking man, described as a printer, was charged with receiving • quantity of leather and other articles, the property of George William Shelton. The facts of the ease appeared in yesterday's Express. Mr. Chambers made an earnest appeal to the jury on be half of the prisoner, and he contended that the charge rested entirely upon the evidence of the man Yates, who, he said, was upon his own showing • witness entirely unworthy of belief. He also called witnesses to prove that on the night spoken to by the witness Yates he was engaged in sitting up with a sick person named Kendrick. The Recorder having summed up, the jury retired to deli berate upon their verdict, and after toeing absent about twenty minutes they returned into court and gave a verdict of Guilty. Evidence was then given that the prisoner was convicted of felony in this court. The conviction, it appeared, took place as far back aa the year 1847, and the offence was stealing a purse. There were several other charges of a similar nature against the prisoner, but as Mr. Chambers objected to their being tried by the Lime ° try, and no other jury wall in at tendance in consequence there being three courts sitting, it was arranged that the other charges should stand over. Henry Kitt, 18, pleaded guilty to two charges of forging the signatures to Post-aloe money orders, and he was sen tenced to eighteen months' hard labour. John Lewis, 19, pleaded guilty to a charge of forging an order for the delivery of a banker's cheque book, and he was also sentenced to eighteen months' hard labour. Julius Louet, • Frenchman, pleaded guilty to an indict ment charging him with stealing a gold watch and chain and • considerable sum of money. Mr. Pater, who appeared for the prosecution, informed the court that the prisoner took up his abode at au hotel in Golden-square, and the prosecutor was also a guest at the same hotel. During the night the prisoner got into his room and stole everything he could lay his hand on, actually removing the railway rug of the prosecutor, which he had placed under his pillow to raise it higher. The prisoner was sentenced to eighteen months' hard labour. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOWIE. Yesterday, as on the previous day, in consequence of the police court at Guildhall having been converted into use on the occuion of the ball, the charges which ought to have been heard there were brought to the Mansion-house and disposed of by Alderman Finals, who wan sitting for the Lord Mayor. The number of charges yesterday was up wards of thirty, being chiefly for stealing pocket-handker chiefs and watches, and also for making attempts at pocket. picking in the vicinity of Cheapaide and Guildhall. In one or two of the cases where the prisoners succeeded in ab stracting, being very well known, they were committed for trial ; in other cues they were sentenced to three months' imprisonment with hard labour. Others were sentenced to periods of imprisonment varying from six months to six weeks. Two respectably-dressed young men were charged with an assault upon the police-constables. In the first case, the prisoner, _S. Rottelson was charged with striking Inspector Dudley, of the City police, upon the head with a stick. At about half-put 5 o'clock that morning, the company having retired from the Guildhall, a number of policemen were assembled round the principal entrance for the pur pose of preventing any persons from entering the hall. The prisoner was on the platform, and on being requested to move declined to do so, and Inspector Dudley took him by the arm and removed him, and on approaching the edge of the platform the defendant slipped and fell. The officer was about to proceed to remove some other parties, upon which he received a violent blow on the head from a stout walking stick which the prisoner carried in bis band. The defendant, who admitted having struck the com plainant in the heat of the moment, was fined 40s. In the other charge, a young man, of very gentle manly bearing, named Richard Percival, a wine merchant, was charged with striking police-constable 631 in the face with his fist. From the statement of the complainant it appeared that he was clearing the read in Cheapaide at about half-past twelve on the previous night, as the Prince and Princess were expected to come along, when the defendant and two other young gentlemen were walking in the road, and on being requested to go on to the pavement they declined to do so. Complainant attempted to force him on to the pave meat, when he struck him in the face with his fist and knocked his bat off. The statement of the defendant, however, was that the constable took him by the collar of his coat and tore it all to pieces, and he begged of him to take him by the wrist, but be declined to do so, and in self-defence he gave him a push with his open hand, and in the scuttle his bat fell off. A witness corroborated this statement to some extent, but admitted that he and his friends declined to go on the pavement when required to do so ; but added that he dis tinctly saw a man totally unconnected with them knock the officer's bat off. Mr. Alderman Finnis said that the officers had a very difficult duty to perform. They were ordered to keep the road clear, and they were obliged to do so. According to defendant's own witness they had refused to go off the road when requested to do so. He fined the defendant 21h., and obaerved that he thought the police had managed ex ceedingly well, and kept order in a most admirable manner, and he bad heard it remarked by every one. BOWBTBEEC. A young man, who had n;preseuisd himself as James Oliver, but who now admitted that his name was James lloyst, woo brought up on remand, charged with amiss of THAMES.. William Ora', a tall and strong lad, aged 17, wee brought before Mr. Woolrych charged with robbing his father. The prosecutor, William Gray. sec., of 7, Ball's-build logs, White Hors e-street, Ratcliff, said he was a lighter man. He put easy a half-sovereign in a box a few days ago, and on Saturday afternoon, when he went to the box for the gold, it was gone. He went in search of his son, but did not find him till theprevions night. Heaskedhim if he had taken the money. The prisoner said, " Yes I did, end have spent it." Some time ago the prisoner took a silk handker chief away from him and pawned it for 3. The prose cutor said, in conclusion, "My soa will not work. He is old enough to got his own living. I have brought him up to my own business. He is 17 years years of sge, and lam near 60 years of age. I went to get clear of him. He comes home late at night, after being with bed company, and has often laid in bed until 3 o'clock in the 'afternoon." The prisoner on being called on for his defence, said that he could say n othing about the matter. Mr. Woolrych —You are a lazy, idle fellow, a worthless fellow ; you will not work, you keep bed company and bad hours, and put the finishing stroke to your worthless:ices by robbing your father of his hard earnings, the half-sovereign which he wanted to buy provisions for himself and your mother. You are a base, good-far-nothing fellow. I shall remand you until next Tuesday. THE HACKNEY CARRIAGE TRADE. - - A deputation from the proprietors and drivers in the hackney carriage trade waited yesterday upon Sir George Grey at the Home-office, with the object of obtain ing the support of the government to a revision of the pre mutt act regulating hackney carriages, commonly known as the Fitzroy Act. The deputation consisted of Messrs. Murrell, Quinn, Bobbitt, Bayes, Ayres, Coulter, and Picker ing, proprietors, several drivers, and Mr. Smith, secretary of the South London Cabmeo'a Club, and was accompanied by Sir S. M. Pato, M.P., Mr. R. Hanbury, M.P., Mr. John Locke, M.P., and Mr. W. Williams, M.P. Sir S. M. Peto having introduced the deputation, said a committee of delegates appointed by the proprietors and drivers had gone carefully through the pieeent act, and had drawn up a series of resolutions embodying the alterations they desired. On looking through the statements submitted to him he must say he thought they had made out a case for inquiry. He therefore trusted that the government would give the sub ject their best consideration, and not offer any opposition to the prayer of the petition. Mr. It. Hanbury, M.P., ex pressed the same view, and testified to the improved state of the trade as far as civility and politeness to the public were concerned. Mr. Smith handed to Sir George Grey copy of the petition and minutes of committee referring to the clauses in the present act, which they consider re quire amendment. The principal alterations asked for are as follows :—That the present sixpenny hiring be abolished, and that no driver be compelled to let his cab for lees than one shilling, but that be be bound to go two miles for that sum if required. That a certificate be given to drivers in lieu of the metal badge now worn. That no calm should be deemed plying for hire unless standing on mime place autho rind by the police commissioner. The restoration of the claim relating to lost property contained in the act of William IV. That all agreements between hirer and driver for purposes beyond the limits of the act be binding on the hirer as well as on the driver. That children out of arms be reckoned as persons. That proprietors should not be responsible for loot property to a greater amount than Si. That any driver being summoned and proving himself to be right shall receive compensation for lost time for himself and witnesses. That every proprieter or driver shall receive notice of the unfitness of his horse or carriage for public use before becoming liable to prosecution. That a cheap mode of appeal against magisterial decisions be instituted for the present tedious elenrive promo, ice., &c.—Sir George Grey said the p roposed alterations involved some important points. He wo uld give them mature and careful considera tion. He was glad to hear from the boo. member for Mid dlesex of the great improvement which bad taken place amongst the drivers of cabs, as well as in the cabs them selves. He believed this to be the case, and he hoped it was one sign of the prosperous state of the trade. (Expres sions of dissent from several members of the deputation.) At all events there had been a large increase in the number of licenses applied for. UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. OXFORD, JUICE 9. MODERATION CLAW LI/IL—The classicifinoders ton have this ermine issued their award of dames as follows: C Aux L —W. Addis, Balliol ; H. C. B. Brumley, Blue. nose ; E. R. Berner, Exeter ; Viscount Bovingdon. Balliol ; J. J. Bramstoo, New ; R. Crawley, University ; J. Dobell, Christ Church ; P. A. Henderson, Balliol ; J. I). Lester, Jesus ; E. Michell, Magdslen ; W. Moore, New ; H. F. O'Hanlon, Bnisences ; C. J. Pearson, Corpus Christi ; W. A. Pastern, Merton ; A. 0. Prichard, New ; IL G. Ri dley, Balliol ; J. E. L. Bliadwall, Christ Church ; W. H. Biraeo; Balliol ; J. H. Stennett, Merton ; T. Taylor, Corpus Christi ; H. D. Trail!, St. John's ; H. G. Woods, Corpus Christi ; J. Wordsworth, New. CLAM 2. A. C. Auchmuty, Linooln : H. N. Churton, University ; C. D. 03bham, University ; E. C. Dermer, St. John's ; R. B. Gardiner, Wadhem ; S. P. Hall, Pem broke ; 0. M. Holden, Corpus Christi ; J. H. Horner, ; 1). Her, Wadham ; J. Kibble, Christ Church H. H. Morris, Jesus; E. S. Overton, Pemtroke ; J. E.; Platte., Lincoln ; H. B. Pugh, Botha ; L L. Sharpe, St. John's ; C. E. F. Stafford, New ; W. C. Tabor, Baer nose; C. E. Vertue, BallioL CLissai 3.—S. B. Bathe, Balliol ; E. H. Birley, Christ Church ; E. C. Follett, Balliol ; H. C. Jolly., Merton ; H. Al`Neile, Christ Church ;C. J. Naming, Corpus Christi ; J. 0. Marshall, New ; C. E. Maurice, Christ Church •• Moore, Exeter ; J. C. Marion, Jesus ; L. J. Riedel', Italliol ; L. G. G. Robbins, Trinity ; C. M. Smith, Bulbul ; F. A. Spencer-Smith, University; F. E. Warren, St. John's. W. E. JilL,, W. L. Nrwitss, E. C. Wtuciustr, W. W. XIII; Moderators. RAILWAY MID PUBLIC COMPANIES IN PARLIA- NeNT.—Yeeterday, after hearing further evidence sad the arguments of counsel, the committee pawed the Lynn and Sutton Railway Bill. Mr. Bidder, C.E., and Mr. Stewart were examined in the committee on the proposed new line to Brighton. The proceedings in connexion with the South Yorkshire and River Dun Transfer were continued, and the case of the Lancaster and Carlisle and London and Ned.lt- Western wY further adjourned. In the Lords the raw for the Staines and Wokingham Railway was taken on the Duke of Richmond's committee, and that of the °King- Mon to the amalgamation of the Great Western and Walt Midland was continued in the committee of which Earl Amherst in the chairman._ _ CHYRTAL PALLGIL—ONL SHILLING DAT.—TIJEN DAT, Joni 9.—Admimione on payment, $029& ditto by mama Make* $4O: totml. 2.89.. _ _ FrtU binu — efit of reduced duty obtained by pur chasing Homiiusn's Pun Tea : eery cbakse at la 441. sad M. " High Standard" at 41. ad. (formerly 4a Bd.), la the strongest and most delicious Imported. Agents la may barn supply U paoks‘.—(Atlvertisentest.l LAW INTELLIGENCE. JUDICIAL COMMITTER OP 11212 PRIVY COUNCIL The Judicial Committee will commence Allan( for the despatch of business on Saturday, June 13, at 11.-Booth v. A'Beckett- Millen and another v. A'Beckett-Richerdson end another, Executors of Oho lam Moortootah v. the Government represent ing the Estate of the Nabob of the Carnatic-Wilson clerk) v. Pendell tclerk) -Williams (clerk, v. the Bishop of Salisbury, Mama and Reviews, to be heard June 19-Collector of Madam v. V eencamoo Ummal-Khajah Gour All Khan v. Aahruffoonissa and others-KhaJsh Gone AU Khan V. Khajah Ahmed K hen tie Advocate. General of Bengal v. Ranee Surnomoyee-Rajah Leesenund Sing,. the Government of lienaal and others-11 inch. lags v. NUM and another-Leishman v. WthrllDO- Tatham and another assignees of estate of C H. Ledward) v. Audrey and another-DUI v. Murphy and anothirr-Papayanni and others v. the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company-Wise v. Rajendro K ashore Ached* Chowdry-Pearson v. Fairly and others-Cleary v. MAndrew and others-Inman v. Stone and others-Inman v. Slone and others-Buckwell and others,. Bibby and others-Grindley v. Stevens and Atkinson--Grindlay v. Stevens and Atkinson-Trask v. Dowie-Teak v. Maddox and others-Dean and others v. Richards and others. Motions in Patent Cases Jordan's Patent Prolongation (Improvements in the construction of ships, dc., Nov. 2, 180), to Ili hearing- Raffords' Patent Prolongation (Improvements in baths, de., Nov. SS, 1849), to fix hearing. Patents-To be heard July 1, at 101: Hrnit Prolongation mannfacture of gas -Prtdeaul a Pro longation Mast furnaces, dc.)-Ruthven's P4tlon (pro • polling vessels;. July 2, M 19J -Taylor's Pro MAWR machines;. Judgments : Abraham v. Abraham, Mader ;to be delivered on June 13)-the Rev. Wis. L v. the Bishop o f Cape Town, Cape of Good Hops. HOUBK OF LORDB.—Jums 9. COMMITTEE FOR PRIVILEGE& (Present the Lord Chancellor, Lord Brougham, Lind Cranworth, Lord Chelmsford. Lord Kings:town, Lord Redmdale (in the chair), and other noble lords.) THZ DEINDONLLD PZIRkOZ. This, as is well known from its frequent appearances before the house in the last two serious, is • petition of Thomas Barnes Cochrane, claiming to vote at the election of representative peers for Scotland, as Earl of Dundonald in the peerage of Scotland. The question involved is the legitimacy of the claimant, it being alleged that no legal marriage of his parents bad taken place until alter his birth. The facts and evidence have been fully re ported from time to time. At the last hear. mg Captain Arthur Cochrane, the third brother of the claimant, who was the fret son born after an unques tionably legally constituted and undisputed marriage had been solemnized, and who bad petitioned the house to be beard against the claim, withdrew from any further prose cution of his case. The cue now came on for further hear ing to-day at the sitting of the house. Lord Roiesdale moved that the order for the sitting of the committee for privilege. be discharged, and the case no farther proceeded with, on the ground that, all opposi -1 tion having been withdrawn against the claim, tt was not competent toe. Scotch peer exercising the rights and functions of that rank to coma to the house of his own motion and experts for the purpose of establishing his legitimate claim to his title. The Lord Chancellor, Lord Brougham, Lord Cranwortb, and Lord Chelmsford were of opinion that, however valid the objection might have been had the house not entered on the inquiry at all, as the house had allowed the claim to be brought forward, and tad directed that notice should be given to the younger brother of the claimant, and admitted • petition (rain him disputing the claim, the case could not be now stopped, but must be continued to its result. Lord Kinpdown, although Mahood to agree in the °bier. tion taken by Lord Redesdale, expressed himself unwilling, under the peculiar circumstances of the cans, to press his opinion. It was then decided by a majority of the noble lords present that the case should go on. Lady Danclooald, the mother of the claimant and widow of the late earl, who had been previously examined, was recalled for the purpose of being examined in answer to the evidence of a witnessnamed Jacloon,who had been secretary to Lord Dundonald, and who had stated in substance that lady Dundonald had acknowledged to him that she was not married to the late earl in the first instance nor until that marriage took place which is undisputed. Isdy Dundonald emphatically denied the truth of Jackson's assertions in this respect, and in others of a very damaging character. Her ladyship repudiated in theetrongest teems haring ever had say association with or made any com munication of any kind to Jackson. In reference to the evi dence of a witness named Mrs. Dean, a governess in her family, Lady Dundonald denied that she had ever made, or caused to be written, a statement that her younger son, Captain Cochrane, ought to be celled Lord Cochrane, and not her eldest son. It may be remembered that the first alleged marriage was a Scotch one, which it was stated took place in 1812 ' • the second. and undisputed marriage, took place in Eoglaed in 1818 ; and it appeared that a second Scotch marriage took place in Edinburgh in .1825, the alleged object being to legitimatise the eldest son, the claimant, according to the Scotch law. In reference to this lady Dundonald was examined, and stated that she never had any reason given to her why this particular mar riage should be solemnised ; she was only told by het hus band that it was to take place. A question was then raised as to the admissibility in evidence of an entry is a book of one of the partners in • firm of attorneys of London, of an interview having taken place between the late Lord Dundonald, then Lord Coch rane, and himself, in London, on the day after the alleged first marriage, which it was stated took place at Annan, in Scotland. . . The Lord Chancellor, on the pert of the other noble and learned lords, stated that they were of opinion that the entry was admissible in evidence. Lord Redasdale suggested that it wu necessary to have farther evidence, and especially in reference to the second Scotch marriage, in order to enable the house to come to a satisfactory ci.oclucion. On this it was put to counsel for the claimant whether he wished a postponement of the case for the production of further evidence. Sir F. Kelly (with whom wu Mr. Fleming) for the claimant, stated that be bad no further evidence to pro duce, and be proceeded to address the house in support of the claim, and had not concluded when the house adjourned. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—JUNE 9. Bittinp in Banco. —(Before Lord Chief Justios Cockburn, and Justices Wigbtman, Crompton, and Blackburn.) EARL CARDIGAN V. LIEU.-COLONEL CALTRORPIL—THE LIGHT CAVALRY CHARGE AT BALAHLAVA. After our report left yeetarday, Serjeant Shee said he had brought the whole matter before them, and he preyed their lordships' particular attention to the state of feeling which existed between those two gentlemen from 1867 to 1863, and they would see that at all events in 1861 Lieutenant-Colonel Calthorpe had shown the utmost desire to conciliate Lord Cardigan, and to do what he could to prevent the con tinuance of the painful impression which remained on his mind. Lord Cardigan, from the statement of oneof hisfrieods, had for the last two years remained satisfied with the course Lieutenant-Colonel Calthorpe had taken—a worse that showed no bitterness or resentment in the mind of Liente. nant-Colonel Calthorpe for Earl Cardigan's endeavour to ruin him. Under the circumstances he contended that Lord Cardigan was not in a position to come there and uk for the interference of the court. -- Mr. Coleridge contended that, consistently with the legal principles upon which the court acted, it was impossible to make the rule absolute. He urged that Lieutenant-Colonel Caltborpe's explanation was a sufficient apology. The Lord Chief Justice said that if Lieutenant-Colonel Calthorpe had stated before that he never intended to say that the Earl of Cardigan did not charge in or out of the battery, the court would never bare beard of the applica tion, and so far from the explanation withdrawing any im putation on the Earl of Cardigan's personal courage, he was rather inclined to think it cast one. Mr. Coleridge raid no such charge could be withdrawn, for none was meant. The Lord Chief Justice said be thought it imputed one with a bitter sucasen—a bitter sneer—putting it indol. gently, by saying the horse swerved. Mr. Coleridge said that no doubt it was so put, but he made no imputation. The Lord Chief Justice said that what had been put was that wherese others charged into the battery, Earl Car did not. Mr. Coleridge said that this was not so, and it bad never been so imputed to Earl Cardigan. What Lient..Colonel Calthorpe believed was another matter, but it certainly wee never imputed. Mr. Judie. Crompton said it would appear that Lord Cardigan had goo* into the battery, wu entangled amongst the Itnenene, and he was met by the advancing troops re turning. Mr. Coleridge—Yes. And it was believed at the time that he hail not gone into the battery, but that Lieutenant- Colonel Calthorpe as a man of honour could not logger con tinue to say so. Mr. IX Brown followed our the same side, and urged that Earl Cardigan when he felt himself aggrieved should have followed Lord Panmure's advice, and atones have appealed to the civil tribune* and riot have allowed . six years to pa by before doing so. He abstained from doing so, sod now Lieutenant-Colonel Celthorps was thought to be made the scapegoat to deter Mr. %Mesh' from publishing any re marks oe Berl Canlipn. N t . B oe ill, i n s upport of the role, said the learned ser *nes speseh had been made with a view of diatractiog their lordsh ips ' atimition from the teal point to a variety of oreninidarmwe that hod no illation to the real point Minna MABIBITS. TALLOW.—Tussouv livieuro.—The market wee 9 (14 4 to-day.—Soot, 42a 9d. ; July to September, 43a ; Octots, to December, 461. Delivery to bet evens& 56 lush snivels ditto, 668 casks. COTTON.—LrmarooL, Jo,' 9.—We have hada Roelof demand to-day and a slow market, prime Wag money* irregular and slightly in favour of buyers. Ma sales e n 2,000 bales, of which 1,000 are for export sad speculate, COTTON GOODS, MANCHE:4TM, JUNI 9.—The ye n market is exceedingly depressed. and prices are lower al round. Spinners comiog ont of contract are lUMOUS lo kp. and are willing concede id. per lb. on last week's p rice& There appears to be no good feature in the market, and the decline appbes toyarus for nearly , all marketa. Buyer for all markets alike seem to have made up their minds that n is unsafe to operate. The news by the last two or thre e mails from India haw tended to diamurme shippers to the Fain from baying, but there is no doubt that the main source of the present disturbance of eionfidenoe is in the latest aces from America. Many people here believe it probable thei the next or following trail will bring intelligence of the fell of Vicksburg, and with the full of this important etroog. bold visions of cotton being set at liberty rise op. not very clear it is true, non definite MA to quantity, but still sufficient to induce fear amongst capitabsta, and to render then cautious how they lay out their money till a better km.. ledge may reach them of the hazards of their position. Not. withstanding the lower prices at which spinnen are wiling i e operate to-day, the reports are that exceedingly little bon Deli has been done, and sellers say it ia almost im pawhle to describe the market as too fat. The cloth market h a also been dull, with warmly any demand, and if mania. turen were to press melee of shirting, and other goods for India they would have to take :id. per piece lower, but mon of those who are.workieg theirimille are pretty.full of orders, and hold tolerably firmly to their quotations. Some few are not in so good a position, and therefore the tendency of the market is to a decline. Buyers, however, hold back in the cloth much as they do in the yarn market. The knows suttees with which many millowners have been working throughout the crisis, and with which others hem mon recently opened their mills, is leading to a more WNW desire to resume hi:mimeo. There Ire some who believe that in the event of the cessation of civil war in America, the prices of cotton would not ultimately recede for some pan more than 3d. or 4d. per lb., and that the risk would Dot he so great after all ; others, however, say that placing the gotten in America at the lowest estimate, large quantities would be ready to come forward, and think that the dachas would be at least a shilling per lb. It is the risk involved o such • disparity in opinions that keeps so many mills idl e whilst there is so much cotton accumulating (and likely to accumulate still further) at Liverpool. WOOLLEN CLOTH.—Lians, Juni 9.—The markets to-day were of the recent quiet character ; very little am done in either hall beyond sorting up, and rate. realm without material change. /dANUFACTURES3.—HODLIERIWIILD, Jun 9.—The tight improvement ootioed lent week has been maintained to-day, as about the same amount of business has beel turned over exceptiag black doeskin., in which rather heavier purchases have been made. This being the time when the autumn trade usually commences mem:autumn are looking out for orders for heavier goods, but so far cah, a very few have been received. WOOLS.—BUDIMPAFIELD, JUKE 9.—Sow that Loathe sales are concluded prices have become more firmly eau• Wished and buyers come into the market with more coot. dame, so that a tolmakdy good business has been done, both to-day and during the week. OORN.—Hors, Joan 9.—At to-day's market a modern 'apply of Englab wheat, which sells slowly at barely he week currency,beat reined red making 465. to 47a. per 50114 Foreign meets with more retail inquiry at a re:bantam of le. per qr., which decline but few holders are will's' to accept. Barley steady at late rates. Beans and pew un- altered. Oats dull and rather cheaper. The foreign kir porta last week are as under W heat, 6,249 qrs. ; barley. 3,445 qrs. • oats, 4,330 gra ; beans, 216 qrs. ; pe as , qrs. ; taros, 191 qrs. ; linseed, 483 qrs. ; oil cakes, 296 toss; bones, 842 tons. ' • CUD% Jong 9.—Our millets are not keen bum to-day, but have to give last week's rates for fine de• scriptions of both red and white wheats. Barley nomisaL Beans make late prices. Oats and other articles unaltered in value. LIVIRPOOL, JUNE 9.—At our market to-day, with a moderate attendance, wheat met • slow sale at a decline since Friday of Ist. per costal. Flour dull and easier. Indian corn again 6d. per quarter cheaper. LTNR, Jugs 9.—Since Friday, we have had heavy rains, which are much wanted for the sprieg crops. Hay 'harvest is partially commenced in this neighbourhood; crop is very light. At to-day's market we had • moderate show of wheat ; the demand was slow, at last Tuesday's rates. Beans and osta as last week. Price per impend quarter to the grower:—Wheat, white, new, 611 1 e. to Übe. per imperial bushel, Ws. to 525. ; ditto red, 6111 a to alba, 445. to 475. Barley, distilling, 601bs. te 5111., 30a. to 321. Oats, 361bs. to 4211., t2s. to 26e. Beans, new, 631bs. to 6411., 38e. to 40s. Nawcurrut, JUNE 9.—The weather since Saturday ha, been exceedingly wet, and, if succeeded by sunshine, the rain will be of great benefit to the country. At oar market this morning we had a moderate show of wheat from the growers, but from the coast the arrivals are to • fair ex. tent; having, however, a thin attendance of buyers, busi. nese proceeded slowly, and very few transactions resulted, factors being disinclined to accede to the wishes of on millers. Flour sold upon much the same terms as hereto- fore. Other articles unchanged. . _ SAXLSBUIIT, JUNI 9.-0; market to-day was male rately supplied with grain ; but haymaking open. tions being very general, there was • limited attn.:. ance both of buyers and sellers. Business in wheat was dull, and prices remained nominally unaltered. There was no alteration in the price of flour. Malting operation being almost brought to a close, and nearly all the belt barley being bought up, there was little or no trade &a; Malt trade steady. In other grain not much bacon, doing at late rates. Wheat, 37a. to 52e. Barley, 25. 40.. Oats, 22a. to 2Se. Beans, 425. to 60a. Yeas, to 40s. Rye, 30. to 3&. per qr. Flour, 36.. toil,. per sack. Malt, his. to Ws. per qr. CA.ITLE.-81113BCRY, driNE 9. —The supply of cattle to-day was thin, though in greater number then lad mar• kat, and the quality and condition altogether we. Wen* good. There war a short attendance of buyers, and the trade very sluggish, though late in the day a good &GU Inc. was effected at late rates. There were about 1,2C0 Mete penned, for the mod pert of prime quality. The trade . 14 steady, but all found purchasers, and late prices were fully supported. There was a good supply of lambs, and e brisk tads was done. former rates being very fully supported. There " an abundant supply of calves. which found a ready sale, hat prices were a trifle lower. Good ox beef, Ils. bd. to Ii per score ; cow and heifer ditto, 10s. to 11e. ; best Don mutton, 7d. to 74d. per lb. ; inferior Maeda, 6d. ; red, a to Ticl. ; fresh pork, bid. to 7d. ; salted ditto, 7d. to and 9s. to 9s. 6d. per score ; green bacon, 75d. to sd. par lb. ; dry ditto, Bd. to 9d. ; sweet pickled hams, 81d. 0 9d. ; quarter old stove pip, lie, to 14s. each ; cows Ina calves, 121. to 141. __- TRAFFIC RETURNS. Mlles Pas. Ifer- Total, TlOl umwArs. open sengers chan.h3e 150 lie Week ending March 15. 4 4 4 i Mat Indian: Bengal Division OOl 7.',11 13,101 15.015 SPG North-Wes! Provinces 3201 1,957 2,39 T 1,.01 1.6.0 Week ending Jane 3. Belgian Eastern Junction. 201 103 175 W " Week ending June 13. Oisavw &South Western 190 _ gm 11071 London, Brighton, and h F 444 Week ending June 7. . Great Luxembourg Manchester, South Jaun ting & Altrincham North London Omega and Newtown &Llanulloes&Newtown 41 411 632 1.073 &V BERTHS, MARRIAGE/3, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. CROBK—June 4, at Boner annuals, Brighton. the wife of J. 8, OVIS, Fais, of a eon. HUTH —June 7, at Audit, Dorking, the "P t° L G. Heath, lAN , C. 8., of a *on. HULL— , June 8, at lAnadowneroad North, Kensington . P o i• the wife of H. C. LOGI, Esq., of a daughter. 1011.7180 N.—June 6, at Ryde, hie of Wight, the wife a C s s' Cain J. 0. Johnaou, R.N., of a daughter. KIRTLAND.—June 6, at Gloneest, rroad. Regentspork. the wUe of Mr. W. T. Kirtland, of a daughter. MARRIAG ES. BEILDOZ—BRwUCn,K.—Juuethe Ro, at t h e C ini. te oogregatlowd Kentish To by ev. .am 4. Mr. W. Ben 4 Roatiben7 Vffiss, Tufnel7park, W Blinn Mary, dmiiina' Mr. T. Brace, of Camden Town. BIRCH—WATTS.—Jurie at at.. Mary Abbott's, ensiaiu'l• Mr. H. C. Birch, to Indices Mary, daughter of the late Watts, of Maigewareroad. WEBBSR-8511T11.--June 6, at Holy Trinity Church, Wthe Be.. W. Vincent, Thomas Richard Witham. '' ebber, PJq., of Lombard street, City, to Matilda 1 14 daughter of P. Smith, ,of Mauchesier.terrace, hdiagt , ' DEATHS. BURGESS—June 6, at St. Swithic'slane. Mr. Ti. Burr.'"". Ir 3 `' BITEROWICS—June 6. at Glosswater.criacent, Hyde - park Burrowes, BAG.. aged 47. OLOYN—June 6, at ilarnabury.road, Islington, N. J. W l ' Naq., aged 84. J LIDDELL—Juue 4, at Ravensworth Castle, the lion. H. J. dell, aged 3A. PAK filltlAM—June 7. at Bruton-street, Lady Lida , * } . ll4 ''' ° Pakealuin, aged 31. d d set, PLENDRULKATif —June 5, at Rarnagate, W. S. 11, U .- 3 .1.• 84 . SMITH—June 5, at Manaden Pareinage, Easel, W. o 0. Bp., of Rich-terrace, Old lirceupton. • Mated and Pahhahed by Wathait NM natal 0 f _V . I . ; Lenhardhteeet, to the City et Leaden. MAU'. Lombard-etre* la the Imbue et wbagerria , WiDiffilai, 701 110, 18611. , O DUN .a togg to 11 Tie Vol SAM to sow km 111111 Joi I. liotras. los boo •01111011 1 the vop The I moth, a rel Seams 150 kino le. 5. Meant Yast I C AI Ltr hi the —For h BEWEI Slitl, iiffds lsit In =EU 1 GILLA Amt. S aj tamed lie sr MOO BkW! Co 4ii to Rd ye beads KEY, mock by Mr owner be ton D. CC Dock maim LC. years, septets L We ' for tt IttFl the D cling 3yin clue em Boas, an o dam pate toUoi CS too& cook Cola tart! 'tree stree froi Bunt ,C 3 3 trap and MIL LIE on I tort CUM bein own of 1 the mm hal Oa tiec FT; 2if 14 Pa II