The Express. — London, England, 1848-03-16 00:00:00

fie BEama. OLTMPIC.—The .‘ Hunchback" was played at this theatre last night with Mr. G. V. Brooke as Master Walter. Contrary to what appeared to he a general expectation, this is b no means unlikely to prove one of Mr. Brooke's successful parts. Certfully studied, slamically read most, and powerfully expressed, the character seemed last night as fresh to the audience aft if the play were at its first perform ance. The part was dressed as of old, nor were there any attempts at new readings or constructione. It was the vigour and feeling with which the part was played, that coestituted the excellence of the delineation. Jolts was played for the first time in London by Miss Duet, a young lady yomewkat unwisely proclaimed in the bill s to be ef "great provincial celebrity." Were there a suitable °pink g on our board., Miss Buret would probably take *high place in the lino of character of which Julia is a good ensample. She appears to have been trained in a te tter soo he l than matt of the actresses w'..43 step from provincial t oe Lon don boards. Some of her points were given with fine finish, aim the discriminating audience which filled the house ap peared heartily to appreciate them. After the play there was last night a new tarce, written by Mr. Edevaril S irling. It was Gall. d " The Bedroom Window ;' but The Sword- Knot " might have been a better title, as the plot entirely rested on the ownership of su ch an accoutrement, dropped h. an officer in a descent from the window of his mistress. • With -ut being remarkable for point er sp:rit the piece is an amusing trifle, neatly put together, and respe.lably per formed, We may take this opportunity to observe on the clean condition of this house, end the courtesy of them em ployed in it. In these respects the Olympic sets a good es ample to other theatrical esllusunts of our metropolis. • • • --- UNIVERSITY AND CLERICAL. Oxroan, March 15.—Twa NEW PlioefOtts..—Tho res pective moieties of Exeter and University Colkwes, whore turn it is to appoint the erectors for the cooling year, met this day lie that ear. woe, when the Key. William Andrei., M.A., fellow nd tutor of teeter College, and the hey. Thomas Shadforth, M.A., fellow and tutor of University College were elected. The tonner will be senior and the latter junior proctor. CANIIRII,OB.—Rev. J. N. Fein, 8.D., Fellow, has been appointed one of the Tutors et Queens' College. lluhitAM.—Ralph Lindsey, Beg., has presented to the Univertity of Durham the *drowse,. of the rectory of Ickleford, and of the vicarage of lift in, both in the county of Herb.. The annuli' value of the two livings is touterstood to be shout bud!. Mr. Lindsay hag already founded in therrsity schularshl.l • yew, to be held by a student educated at Durham ramroarelso , a. A scholar will be elected to fltl that scholarchip in (kt. nest. The Nev. Dr. Elk, too, armor fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford, haft founded in the University of Durham a scholarship of the value of 211. • year. to be held by s native of the North Riding of Yorkshire, with a preference to cindidates educated at Richmond whoa lite Rawl:Archie is directed to Le eves wells the beet scholar among candi dates us other rt vett+ equally idelL An election to this reholigehip, ali, will take place in Oct. neat. Par PLUM Et:TN.—Rev T. Sine, to Trinity P.C., Minton, Middlesex. London.—Rev. J. Ranh, to Emmanuel Its I °t horough. Leirmwrwnre, t'eterborono ; Pate, Entmanuel L, Camto It. Feamn, to lALLOIOOTOULA R., Lekedershire, din. Peterborough; pre, EntmanuelCull., Cbigibrolge ; see v. W. Ilulmq the.—ltev. S. 11. Fella, w lihtei:vigh IL, Devon., tlio. Exeter ; 350/. with teshirne° i• 11. 1. Wyatt. to Foreol. Mil P.C., _Co. SOLI din. tigiord, s uTth re.idence ; pats.. IS3I-• ails Cod.. Oxford ; sire Iter. J. M.tot-r, deprived.- - Itev.SS. 1. Ila n:111ton, NIA., Invite of Trinity church, St. lithryleb ne, to b.. chap lain to theE.eit loth. Couniany • A -111tru, at Poplar, vacant ty the death of the Nev. 11. lligginsun. M.A. NAVAL PORTSMOUTH, MARCH 15.—The Prince Rrgent, 92, Capt. Martin, Rent out of horlaour on Monday evening to Spitheal.—The Java, trpt., Nailed yesterday manning, with the 70th Itcgt. on board, for Corfu.—The Fairy, at. tender to royal yacht, left this morning for Woolwich.—The Comfort, 2k, Capt. 0. 11. Seymour, arrived this afters.. fro;n Valparaiso, w hence the sailed on the and Dec.--The Colliugosod was at Valjoraivo, and the Congaree. which art toed SI kw days before 11011 the chat of Mexico with freigl.t.-1 he Moikate had test ed for England on the 4th of het., nod the Salmon ...Bed for Cailaa M Oct.—The Ctrava,rt mil, d ut on Jan. 25. and left ag...n on Jam. 29.—(apt. Ilyt:e Parlor, tot t (0110 101, from the Con. stance, Major Del...Me, intalld, from the Cometsnee, have arrived in this grviel.—Tlie Seagull gilled Mum Bahia out Jon. 2t. for Rio.— The Coryofort has cape, ienced tremendous weather on her voyage. ADMIRALTY, MARCH 15.---APPOINTMENTA —Starguus: P. Loonard. to Poictiers—Acting areleting.,Surgenn : I'arkie, to via. ry.—Nos al Cadet : Cl. Silverlock, to St. Vincent. miLn.kiror. - WOOLWICH, MARCH 14.—RorAL ARTILLERY.—Lient, Cotomb, two non-commissioned officer.% and 71. femme.% left Woo:- arid, ...hurUy after two o'clock this morning, and proceeded by one of the Wrtermen's sle•mquckcta hr Ilungerlord.market, and marched thence to k:UottOn..itiarr, fur eoll , epoter by train to Lircrpoul. ro staler to Dublin, to augment the Royal Artillery at that capital, where they would arrive previous to the 17th instant. (not- Tykes company, 3rd battalion, baskets placed under orders to embark for • 1 T 01 p U ; tl 0 A p 0 ol 4. SPORTING. possession of some of the parties to the deed, and ere nnw in the possession of some of the parties to this suit, not intros ducal by way of reviver or supplement only ; and that the peas este on of the property has beets held uniformly and east in u ousiy under and for the purposes of the deed of April 4. With this proposition it is quite consistent tosupposo that the trusts created by the deed may, during a time, have been, and at present may be, improperly administered, and that the title of the charity may be defective, by reason of the existence of rights paramount or adverse to the deed and to the charity. These rights may be now enforceable; Mancini - , of them, sal view the matter, is or has been at any time since the execu tion of the deed clothed with possession. In leas than a year alter April 4, 1842, the ouildinge on the land w. re com pleted, and the defendant (Mr. Munro) accepted the appoint ment of minister, which he has held ever since, subject to the question, whether he has forfeited it by separation from the established church. For when some year , had post after the commeneemeet of his functions, there sense, or revived, or become more fervent and extended, the well-known con troversy on the subject of church patronsge in Scotland, which produced in 1843 the equally well-known secession from toe etabliabed church of a great body of clergy and laity. The dissension did not fail to reach the Scotch prmbyteriane in England, and seems strong v to have affected the religious association now in question. The managers of the charity were divided, no was the congrega tion, but riot iu either else nce equally. The majority of the former agreed with the majority of the latter end with the minister, a stem of things which was likely to end soil did end in the practical defeat of the minority. The majority of managers, however, though successful so far, seemed to have doubted of the solidity or permanence of their merest., if supported 'snip by means not much out of the ordinary tours •of the dealings of mankind. For I cannot but think that there is something strikingly opposed to general notions of correctness in the operations which I have now to mention, considered as the OnefatiOlS of persons intrusted with the guardianship of the institution which those operations were intended to destroy. His Honour then re ferred to the action of ejectment and the conveyance of Feb. 1844. mentioned in our f irmer report, and proceeded as fellows. The sen ciel case in the actton o f ejectment was stated with the concurrence and consent of ftlr. Munro, as well as of Mr. Hebert Barbour, Mr. Alexander Bannerman, Mr. John Bannerman, and Mr. James Burt the elder, to whom belongs the credit (il any) of this strictly teoteric pro ' cording. in which the attorney on one side was the partner of the attorney on the other, so far as there could be consi dered to be two sides, but with which the defendants do not scruple to connect the term " fairness." In this proceeding judgment wee obtained against Mr. Munro by his fri. ndly adversaries. His Honour then said that the first question was as to the preliminary objections which had been raised to the frame of the suit, as regarded parties, but which his Honour did not consider well founded. The neat question wee, whether the constitution deed ought, ter the purposes of the suit, to he considered as valid. Ott this point his Honour was of opinion that the constitution deed bound all the parties to it, and amounted to a con tract titter. it them for valuable ...omeletelfin, that the litnd comprised in it should be uppreprist. .! to pur poses which it deelereel. Any infirmity iii the title of the contracting parties del nor, as the actual Oct. were, present the deed Irma operating as hetwceu theinielvs P. And with respect to persens not parties to the deed, the possession having been such as his Honour hail stated, soy adverse right ought, in his opinion, to be treated in the cause as it mere outstanding claim, not clothed with possesaion. Now it was conformable to the principles of equity, and to the course of decisions in this court as well as in the Court of Chancery in Ireland, to say that, where n person knowingly acquired the possemion of property as a trustee, or being in possession made himself by contract a trustee of it merly, he could nut upon any notion of remitter or otherwise, lie allowed in a suit seeking the performance of the trust to assert any paramount or adverse title °filet own. That he uses uleilly to lose the lone fit tit such title his llonsur did not say, but his title must be asserted, if at all, without a. .y telvrintage derived from the pi - mission acquired in the character of trustee. Ir was, moreover, consistent with mint iple and with the Mortmain Act to hold t h at where a p.irson to possession of land a• owner had devoted it by deed to charitable purposes, fulfilling the conditions of the statute, rind where the p emission had been unititerruptedly conformable to the deed, it was competent to institute a suit far the administration of the trust notwithstanding any infirmity of the donor's title, and that to such a suit it could not he a defence that the land was r. coverable by a title paramount not clothed with poasession. With regard to the couveyauce of February, 1844, if it had been intended to Ise in support of the trusts of the deed of April 4, 11132, it might have been a commendable measure; but, obtaine d as it was, it Rpm used to his Honour to h ive been en act of wrong, and something more—an act belonging to a class of whit 6, if it were allowable to di rive an expression frum a most venerable source, it miuht he said, ss for these things every friend will depart." The title acquiri d under the de. d of Feb , lfitt, was in his Honour's opinion subject to all the I provisions and the obligations of the deed of April 4, 1832. The in at question was as to the propriety of the manner in which the trusts of the charity had been admiaistered, for which the defendants or some of them were its his Honour's opinion clearly answerable, a remark which ought not to extend to Mr. Grant, or to thi ta, who were parties to the suit, to assignees or executors. His Honour then proceeded as follows: The wrong administration imputed to the des Pendants is the perversion of the charity, by wilfully allow• Mg it to be applied to the purpose of divine service and wor ship in a manner differing substantially from that in favour or which the thality was founded. And it is a question which preetieany may be treated as turning solely on the fitness or unfitness, the qualification or want of qualification, of the minister, the dispute not confining itself to Mr. Mun ro's fitness or unfitness, qualification or want of qualification, but extending itself also to other ministers who necasionally since the 22nd of May, 1843, have been allowed to officiate with him or for him. But 1 will for the present at least deal with the question of the fitness or unfitness, qualification or want of qualification of Mr. Munro alone. Now the propositions in this respect advanced by the Attorney. General, and the plaintiffs may, I think, be not inaccurately represented as in effect these. Ist. That it is and has uniformly been essential to the due performance of divine worship and ' , melee, upon the foundation of the con. stitution decreed and essential to the due ps rformanee of its trusts, that the minister for the time being upon the founda tion should be a minister belonging to and in full communion with the established church of Scotland, in the sense in which those words were used in the constitution deed; Zany. That in that sense Mr. Munro, at some time between the end of llicember, 1842, and the month of July, 1844, ei geed (if he bad not before ceased) to be and hiss not since befit a minister belonging to end in full communion with the established church of Scotland; 3rdly. That nevertheless certain of the defendants, bu ing themselves of the body of trustees and teenagers favourable to Mr. Munro's views, having acquired practically the direction and control of the affairs of the charity, he, with their concurrence mid support, elticiates in the place of woraeip in question, and has ever since the year 1842 continued to do so, and to profess the performance there of the ecclesiastical functions belong ing to the minister upon the foundation and to re ceive the allotted stipend accordingly ; and 4thly. That such a state of things is one requiring interpositinn and redeem from the court. It the first and second of these four propositions are well founded and correct the two others are so likewise I have no manner of doubt. Are, then, the first and the second well founded and correct? With regard to the meaning of the words " belong rig so and in full communion with the established church of Scotland," Mr. Seunro and the defendants acting with him contend that the language imports nothing more than example, and is satisfied 'ny an exact resemblance in point of religious be lief, religious discipline, and eceleseistical polity. But it ap pears to me impossible reasonably to acscde to such an argu ment. I think it plainly opposed to the context, and as plainly upporod to the ordinary and proper sense of the ward., independently of the context. I consider that when the connexion of Mr. Munro with this charity be. pen he was a minister belonging to and in full tom muniun with the established church of Seetlend, not merely because he believed his religious impressions, his interpretation of the sacred writings, and hie views of church discipline and eeclesiaetiral polity to accord with hers, but because he was then also in s stronger sense and a closer and mu re positive manner linked to hi r, united to her, end of her. Agate, I consider that when he first performed ar conducted Define worship in the place of worship belonging to the charity as its minister, it was done in connexion with the established church of Scot land, not merely because of the exterior forms and visible observances of the worship and service, and the religious belief of the minister and congregation, but because that minister was then a recognised and recognising son of the established church, and Mcaueeit was by that title that in farm and substance he had been accepted and acknowledged as their pastor. It is argued, however, that the estahlisbed elierch of Scotland is not in the state in which it then was, hat that it has ever since a time previous to June 1843, been in a state of corruption UT error, an d that the principles and tenets of what is called :the free church ought to govern the established church of Scotland, and that independent of this argument all power of a spiritual or ecclesiastical kind has ceased to be exercisa ble in Scotland with reference to preshyterian ministers MR dating in England. I have endeavoured to ascertain whe ther the doctrines, discipline, polity, and practice of the established church of Scotland were substantially, at the later periods referred to, the same as they were on the 4th of April, 1832, ea well as with the amistaace of the materials before the court I have been able ; mid from these materials I think it a just and legitimate inference, that the doctrines, discipline, polity, and practice of the established church at Scotland were substantially such and the same on April 4th, 1832, as when Mr. Munro was ordained to the ministry on this foundation, and were such and the same at that time as they were in the year 1844, and are now. As to the power of exercising spiritual or ecclesiastical jurisdiction in Scotland so as to effect Mr. Munn, notwithstanding his residence in England, I am ef opinion that there was such a spiritual jurisdiction when Mr. Munro became the settled minister of this charity, and that the jurisdiction has never been abandimed or ceased to exist. Whether that jurisdiction could do more than de. dare him to be no longer a minister of the a Mal:dished chureh, ' or no longer in communion with her, I need not, and do not, say ; nor is it necessary for the present, at least, to spe city or ascertain the urisdiction to exercise, or the form of exercising such juri sdiction. I am of opinion that the first proposition of the Attorney-General and the petitioners is correct and well-founded. With regard to the second pro position, Mr. Munro was ordained to the seiritual charge upon this foundation in 1812. In 1843 took place finally, openly, and formally, that great secession from the establithel church in which the free church originated. His Honour then proceeded to read at length the various WO of the General Assembly of the Church of Scot land with reference to the free church, and vari ous resolutions of the Kirk Session of the Menthes. ter Congregation passed at meetings, at which Mr. Munro and other defendants were present, expressing their pity with the seceding party. Ills Honour also read 13IlTTING AT IIIANCIT;ATTE. -- Tt"fTALVT.—.NOt a bet laid ; racer[ u the Warwkk Thal stales and Handicap. t 1 INl,solt SfY.V.PLE CHASE- - ENTRIE , roll THE HARM. ; car.—St. Leger, Naworni, lird Lancer, Scylla, Anna, Young Loamy, , The Page, Repealer, Proceed, llipbriar, Gantry. Prodigate, Fortune. teller, Mushruom, The Urchin, The British Yeoman, The t hanglet, I Gipsy Queen, Alexander, Khooaloor, Mushroom by the Divinguished, Geyburet. BETTING AT LEAMINGTON.—Tru , nsv EvAstso. LEAMINGTON STEEPLE CHASE.-8 to agat ht. Leger, , 8 to I Kest British Yorman, 10 to I agat The Curate, 10 to tautt Jerry, 11 tot agat Edward the Pirst„ H to t egg Proceed (t), 14 oast Standard Guard. 15 to 1 apt The Chandler. Alexander,Weicerhampton,Sir. Arthur, end Repealer are scratched. CHESTER CUP.-20 to 1 agst Cracow, L 5 to 1 apt Blaze (0, 25 to I apt Swallow (t freely), 23 to I agst War Eagle, 30 to I eget Jonathan Wild, 10 to eget Iletman Platoff colt (t ) , to to I agst Lightning (1), 1,000 to 15 egst Patriot (t freely). Deauk.-9 to 1 agst Surplice, 13 to 1 east Glendower, 14 to 1 peg Springy Jack (t to , a large su, and aft off). LEAMLNOTON AND W aura. ARW ICE RA('O4.—%F.DIMPMOY. DUIDALE STAKES of 5 sots. each, and 25 added. 2 mire. (7 subs.) Lord Strattimore's Ind Lancer (Owner) 1 Mr. Littledale's Donna Anna (Brookes) 2 Sir H. Bruce'. Botanint (Bruer) 9 Thu following also 'darted The Fairy, Cpseklenoe, Whistle !Pinkie. Betting: 2 to 1 agst Red Lancer, 5 to I agat Donna Anna.—Won in a Ttro. r. YEAR.OLD STAKES of tO iota. inch, and 25 added. T. TIC. (6 subs.) Mr. B. Green's Lammermoor Mr. Oarnan's Feline (Marlow) 2 Mr. Critt•liny's Sir henry 'larding° ..... 3 Mr. Austin's St. Francis (Wekelield) 4 Betting: 5 to 4 egg Lammermoor, and Eto 3 apt Sir Henry Hardtop. Won by hall a neck ; Sir Henry a bad third. CiterLe STAKES of 25 Soya. each, 10 ft. 1 mile. (3 subs.) Mr. J. Lilbe's The Great Western, walked over. GREAT WARWICKSHIRE STAKES 4f 1001, added to a Handicap or 25 WV. t ilCb, 13 ft, and 3 only it declared. 2 miles. (40 gab., 29 at whom declared.) Mr. E. J. Irwin ad Beilinand (3. Sharp) 1 WOW? , Mr J. Parr'. Ferehill ( 0. 2 Lord st.thmore's Tit Bit ([ Touc h 9 The following also ran —Lyme, Malley, Sampson, and Suonyesle. Betting: 5 to 4 apt Balling:ad, 3 to 1 eget Milliner, end 7 to 1 agst any other. Won very easy. SWEEPS of 5 sows. each, and 25 added. 1 tail*. (13 subs.) Mr. Palmer's Ferrybill (Tanker) I Mr. Parr's Marietta (Wtdtrboune) 2 The following also ran: Dipthong, Bletchiegton, Edwin (h-b), Couaterfeit, Boon" b fby Jerry mita Barbasina, St. Alban's, Bruce, Mr. Canine, John Harris, and The Diamond. Betting 2to I oust Hoot., 3to 1 eget Candle, 6 to 1 SW Bruce, and 7 to 1 each agst John Harris and Yerrybill. Woe by a head ; Caudle u bad third. Br-11010 ON THE COUILSR. CHESTER Cue.-40 to 1 agst Lady Hylda (t), 40 to 1 eget BalLnatad (0,50 to 1 apt Patriot (t freely). 1/ERRT.-14 tO 1 agat Springy Jack, 40 to 1 eget Backbiter. Law vrtlftllcstntf. EQUITY COURTS. The Lord Chasoellor sat in court for • few minutes only, and retired to his private room, with counsel, to hear at, application in the ease of" Vrarde v. Weide." His lordship did not como into eourt during the rest of the day. Before the Vice-Chanceitor of Enthral. IN Z 7 TEI LONDON AND NORTH RAIMAD COMPA.Nr.—PATIMNT UP COSTS 1:PON PUNCNASSI OF LAND.—in this ewe it appeared that the London and North Western .Railway Company hail taken certain land at band Socworth, in Leivetershire, and had paid the purchase money into court, under their act of parliament. The land taken be!arged to a tenant :or life, who had conveyed his interest, cabject to two .annuities, to a trustee. A petition was presented by the trustee and one of the annuitants, that the money might be paid out of court, and invested in go vernment securities. The second annuitant had been served with the petition, and bet appeared, and now coked for his costa—Mr. F. J. Wood appeared in support of the applica tion.—Mr. Spoed, for the r.ilway company, objected to the payment of tine costa.—The Vice-Chancellor considered that the company was bound to pay the costa of the second annuitant, as his interest war prior to that cf the tenant for the. Berme The Chancellor Knight 'kW. ATTORNET-G.EVERAL O. IIIVXkO.—SCOTCiI KIRIL.—The main subjects of conteuticn in this nude are, the que.tions of the validity or invalidity of a deed of trust, dated April 4, 1842; and (if it is to be teeniest as valid), of the propriety or the impropriety of the manner in which its trteue have been admiuratered. His Honour here stated the effector the deed as set out in cur former report, and proceeded ac follows This deed was executed by all the thirteen persons who were parties to it, and (it is right to presume) on the day . of its date. The plan of land expressed to be conveyed by it had been respectively bought before April, 1842, as to one, from Mr. and Mrs. Brown, who, in 1831, conveyed it to the defen dants, Robert Barbour and James Burt, the elder, the de ceased defendant Alexander Bannerman, the defendants Daniel Grant and John Bannerman, and the plaintiff James Kennedy, in fee ; and as to the other, from the defendant Robt. Barbour, who, with his trustee, conveyed it in March, 1832, to the defendant, Jas. Burt the elder, the deceased defendant Alex. I3annerman,the defendants Daniel Grant and John Bannerman, and the plaintiff, Jam's Kennedy, in fee. The purchase-money on each occasion was paid out of a fund contributed by a numerous body of persons for the purpose of appropriating the land in the manner explained in the deed of the 4th April, which shows (as the truth was) that, with a view to it, and in order to its execution, the conveyance of the preceding day had been made. By that conveyance the purebsoer, or the nominal purchaser, of the preceding March and the preceding year, conveyed the plots of land in fee to a trustee, who discharged himself of his trust by executing the deed of the 4th of April. It is to be borne in mind that of the six persons who conveyed to the trustee, all, except Mr. James Kennedy and Mr. James Burt, the elder, were parties to the deed of the 4th of April. It is an admitted fact, that neither of the deeds dated previously to the 4th of April was enrolled ; and it is cootended, and perhaps cor rectly, that therefore all the deeds dated before the 4th of April ought to be conaidered as void. This, however, is a point on which I do not thiuk it necessary to give my opinion. It in admitted also that there was a perfect compliance, as to the deed of April 4, with the formalities required by the Mortraain Act, subject only to the question as to the effect upon that instrument of the invalidity (if any) of the ptomain' deeds. Aud how, as to the possession of the property. It is, I thh,k, I. correct inference from the Pleadings and'evideoce, that both the plots of land were, at thsetisos at the execution ot the deed ot April 4 , in the salmi TUE EXPRESS, THURSDAY EYENING, MARCH 16, 1848. peewee from the answers, and then proceeded as follows: — The whets of the evidence, taken together, has convinced me, and I must declare my opinion to be, that Mr. Munro hee placed himself within the predicament of adherence, elated in the General Assembly's Enactment of June, 1846, which I have read, and that he was net when the suit com menced, and has not been since June, 1844, and cannot be taken now to be, a minister belonging to, and in full corn. trunnion with, the established church of Scotland, within the meaning of the deed of April 4, 1842, nor has the per , formance of divine won ip been in counexion with the esta blished church of Scotland. I mutt state my opinion to be, that the government and administration of the properly in dispute were before and when this litigation began, and must be token to be still, improper and incorrect, and in contra vention of the deed of April, 1842. It may be right to add that my opinion is not feunded in any degree upon the sen tence of the Presbytery of ticlinburah, pronounced in Ja nuary, 1844; 1 must therefore make a decree in the follow ing terms: first saying, that though fulls aware of there hissing been, and being within the church reflect the Free Chinch of Sentient( m. is (not a few) whose theological and general learning, whose aldicy, and the purity of whose lives ..re univeraidly acknowledged—though recognising in the amplest manner (whether the particular views and opi nione of that church are rroneous or exempt from error) the clear right of every men entertaining these views and °pillions to looter, encourage, and support them by any fair means not infringing the equal right of another, nor implying the justification of a bad faith by religious disagreement, still true conduct and proceedings of the minister upon this foundation, and those among the parties to the constitution deed who were concerned in the action of ejectment and the conveyance of February, 1814, appear so contrary to justice , , plan dealing, and fidelity, as to render It impossible with propriety to avoid directing the stirs ore of them to pay the relators' and petitioners' costs of the suit at least to this time.—llia Honour, alter con cluding a judgment which occupied two hours and a half in the delivery, handed to the registrar the minutes of the de cree, referring it to the Muter to appoint a new minute r and new trustee: of the chap 1, and restraining the present miniiitrr and:ten of the trustees from officiating any longer, and also directing various accounts ; but, aft.. r come discus sion, the final settlement of the minutes was postponed till next. uoaa.y Before Vice-Clnoboaler Wigram. FITCH v. WHIIEIL.—CONSTRUcTIon OF WlLL.—This way ' • question of construction, arising upon the will of Anne I Taylor, deceased. The testatrix gave by the will all her real and personal estate to trustees, upon trust, to sell her ' real estate, and such parts of her p e rsonal estate as should be saleable, and stand possessed of the proceeds to arise from the sale of the real estate as a fund personal. and not real ! estate ; for which purpose the testatra dtclured that such .1 proceeds. or any part thereof, should not in any event I lapse or result for the benefit of her heir-at-law. And out of 1 such proceeds and other her personal estate, the testatrix then gave several legacies, and concluded by giving t re sidue of her estate not previously disposed of by th he e wil upon such truss, intents, and purposes, as *lie should by any c dieil to her will direct or appoint. The testatrix died without making ai.y codicil to her will, end tie hill was tl.eit tiled by her next of kin, fur the administration of her estate. The question standing for judgment was whether the diwetion in the wilt that the proceeds arising from the sale of the reel estate ihuu:d form a personal fund and not real estate, and should not lapse or go to the heir-at-law of the testatrix, created by implication a gift for the benefit of the next of kin, or whether such proceed,' belonged to the heir-at law of the testatrix, under the ordinary rule that the mete direction to convert real estate in a will, un attended by a disposition of the proceed*, is not of itself sufficient to entitle the next of kin of the testator to such proceeds all against his heir-at-law. Miser'. Wood, Walker, lingers, Ilsrily, d It. P.Juier, rue arts' the liter ing fur the elil;en tit to the c.uw. Ilis honour now delivered judgment, observing that words di recting that the proceeds of the reality should be a personal fund, and should not result fur the benefit of the heir-at-law, as they had not been followed by an express disposition of such proceeds, were not sufficient to raise a trust fur the next of kin, in exclusion of the heir-at-law. The sums, therefore, which had been applied out of the general proceeds of the estate in payment of the legacies given by the will, would Dave to be apportioned between the real and personal estate ; and the residue of the proceeds arising from the salt- of the real estate paid to the heir-at law. CONSISIOKY COURT. Before Dr. Lushinatam. DAWFON V. DA WAUN —Ds Volo.CE.-1 his was a !tat brought by the wile agaisist the husband tor •divorrx, on the ar. , unds ot cruelty and adultery. There was no opposition, and the court pronounced Cu. the divorce as prayed. ADSI I li.laY Before Ur. Luslangtuu. _ _ . . _ This was the default day after the last term. Two motions were in the first instance disputed of. THE HUWENA.—SALVAna.—Thi, was a suit for salvage services rendered to the lturena while on a trailing voyage to Site.* Leone. The sal vors all. ged that she was out of her course in September lout. The masterdied, and the principal salvo brought the ship home to London. Tne value was about 1,1001. A tender had been made and re fused—After hearing civilians, the learned Judge considered there bad been Food services rendered. The court also held that there was • legal claim for salvage. The Rowena left Sierra Leone in September, and, soon after, the master died. The ship fell in with the Mary, the master of which went on board and brought the Rowena into Cowes. Fears were for some time entertained of a shortness of pro visions. The services of Acreman, the master. wete accepted, and hi brought her home. The Rowena was not in much danger. Food, water, and medicine were short, and the court could not but mark with its disapprobation the fact of • vessel so situate being sent from Sierra Leone to London. The ship w t a brought safely to Cowes, and there was danger and ri,k in the master of the Mary gong on board when the captain of the Rowena had died of fever. The court, under the circumstances, allotted 1501. and costa. WESTMINSTER COUNTY COURT. Before D.C. Moylan, Esq. GRIM; V. TINME.—SCLITTINO A CAUME or ACTION. — This was an action of special damage brought by the plain tiff, a fishmonger carrying on business in Castlevtreet, Leicester-square, against the defendant, an agent of Mr. B. Gregory. On the 21st of February last, whilst the plain tiff was at market, the defiluint, accompanied by sic men, armed with crowbar', sows, eke., proceeded to his house, No. 67, Castle-street. When they arrived there no one was present but the plaintiff's wife, whom they told they had come to repair the house. She wished them to wait until her husband eamehome, but they refused, and commenced tear irgtne flooring up, and pulled down the stairs. On the plaintiff returning home, he saw what had been done, hut not wishing to lose his custom, exposed his fish en the board for sale. The defendont ordered the men to w hitewash the ceiling ; pails of water and brushes were procured, and the water thrown upon the ceiling, falling upon the fish, mate rially injured it. The next day the defendant nailed boards up in front of the premises, so that the plaintiff's fish was destroyed, and had to be conveyed away in the dust-cart. It was for this wilful damage to the fish that the plaintiff now claimed compensation. In answer to the learned judge, the plaintiff said an action would he brought against Barnard Gregory and the other pull. s for trespass, but it had not yet been done,—The Judge was of opinion that before the plain tiff could proceed in the present action, he must give an under taking not to proceed with an other ; if he was allowed to go on with the present it would be completely contravening the spirit of the act of parliament, which did not allow asplitting of a cause of action. The present claim was but one part of the damage under the trespass; and, if it was allowed, the plaintiff might bring a separate claim for the damage done to the stairs and a separate claim for tearing op the floor. Agiiia, the question of t:tle to the pri•soises would likely arise.—The defendant said the title was involved in the ques lion. Mr. Gregory had been ordered to take possession of these premises, by order of the Insolvent Court, and the plaintiff, in keeping possession, was the trespasser.—The learned Judge, alter hearing Mr. Roberts, refused to go into the merits of the case—becaua• tint, it wa. asplitting of a ca rise of action ; and secondly, that us a question of title to the pre mises was mixed up in the question, he had no jurisdiction. It was clearly a cat* for the superior courts.—Mr. Roberts said if he had been instructed uglier he should have advised the plaintiff to have gone at once to the superior court. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. OXFORD CIRCUIT.—STAFFORD, MARCH. 14. Before Alt., Justice eremite 11.. WOUNDIN(I.—George Hampton, 21, and Edieard Hem mings, 23, were indicted for wounded Henry Hieginson at I Stoke-upon-Trent, on the 19th of December. with intent to kill and murder him. Mr. Meteyard prosecuted, and Mr. Vaughan defended the I prisoners. The prosecutor is a police-officer, and was on duty, at midnight, when he received it formation that the prisoners were ereatine a disturbance, and repaired to where they were. lie took hold of Hampton, and found he had a p-ker under hi, arm. He put the hameuff on his right hand, and the prisoner tried to trip him up, but failed. Three men who were near cried out, " On in Oeorge; give it him." Hampton, on this, pulled the officer down and fell under him. Some persons pushed Higeinson off the prisoner, who then struck him on the nose and head with a poker. The other prisoner then struck him two blows with 3 similar instrument, which rendered hint senseless. Hampton it ap peared was a violent character, and prosecutor had fre quently been called into publi . t houses to expel him, and had been as often threatened by him. On the previous night he said " o—n your eyes, I'll be into you to-morrow night." Another officer named Harri-on, who went to the prosecutor's suoistance, found Hampton kneeling on his sumach, having his hand in his stock, and trying to strangle him. The other Evisoner, on his coming up, struck him also with the poker. The evidence of Mr. Dutford, a surgeon, proved that the skull of the prosecutor had a large fissure, was cut down to the bone, and concussion of the brain was caused by the wound,. The man's life was endangered. Mr. Vaughan contended t at the unnecessary and otilcious interference of the policemen was the sole cause of the afti'sy, in thus attempting to destroy the liberty of the subject and bad it not been for that, the two men, although intoxi cated, would have been gone home quietly. Three witnesses were called for the prisoners, from whose testimony it would seem that the prisoners were going along talking to each other, when the policemen came up, pulled Hampton about, and said " I have been waiting for you a long time, and now I have found you ; you are a liar, for you stole that poker." The prisoner said "If you west to take me to the bole, let me go quietly." The police man then struck him with a stick, and on that th , y fought and struggled together. These persona did not see a poker used is the fracas, hut they saw the prosecutor lying bleed ing in the gutter. Mr. Meteyard considered it unnecessary to occupy the time of the court by s reply on the defence. The Judge observed that it was evident there was gri,es perjury on one side ur the other, and the jury must decide to which they attach credibility, as the case altoriethi.r, ac cording to the account given, was a most c straordur .ry one. The pasoners Iln re convicted of a common assault oily, and sentenced to six moeths' imprisonment. STAPPOUD, MARCII 15. Before Mr. JWIOOO eatteem. RICINARDX O. liAaPall AND ANOTHILL—BUIACH OP CONTILACT.—The plaintiff is en engine -maker, raiding at Stourbridge, and the defendants are fire-briek-makem, at Langley-green works. The facts of the case, so opened by Mr. Whateley, Q C., were these:—Early in the year 180, the defendants engaged the plaintiff to make for them a small clay-mill for the manufecture of fire-bricks, the price of which was to be 551. • subsequently, however (in the mon th of June), the defendants proposed to the plaintiff that he should make for them a steam-engine of 14 horse power, with a 14 inch ej tinder, on condition that the latter received back his mill and allowed 401. for it. This was agreed to, and the estimated Coat of the new engine was 3001., and a contract was entered into by which the plaintiff covenanted that it should Ire cnineletal by the 28th of August. or that he shou'd oe fined 161. per week for every week's delay from that time. Wbilet the work was programing the defendents alte red their minds on the subject of the power of the engine, and propoiscd to the pldintill that he should make it twenty.four-hone power. the necessary alteratioes were ali oat in the work, and the engine completed in the month of November. the plaintiff, however, in consideration of the alterations, refused to abide by the contract as to price, but charged according to mei sure and value.—The sufficiency and strength of the work manship am ountroot to by the plaintiff's witneeses. and the am itit to be recovered was above 4001., thn caging 'charge of 5691. having been re duced to this sum by vari use setad:B.—On the part of the defendants, Mr. Serjeant Talfourd contended that the plain tiff could not recover, insists:men as the work was done under a written contract, to he completed et a specific price and within a spi•eitic time ; that it had not oeen done in a skilful and efficient o an er, and that, as the engine • had not hi en eonioleted until long af t. r the time agreed upon, the def;ndants were entitled to a considerable sum by way of forfeiture on that account. A great numb:r of witnesses were called, the chief points in their tvidence tendintt to chow that the engine, when it was first set to work at Cnristams, was incapable to work the mill, and that the defendants had not foes able to make any use whatever of it. There was a good deal of conflicting vidence, but the loaned judge in summing up said that the main question for the consideration of the jury was whether, node r the eireunistancee, the work could be consi dered as having been done under the original contract.—The jury inland that it had not, and returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Damages 2901. over and above the amount aimed. ~.1 so him.—This trial occupied six hours. WESTERN CIRCUIT.—Mattem 14. elitPorN COMT. — Before Mr. Moron Platt. DEVIL/.11)1N AN IN&UItANC& OFFICE. —Thos. Wady and Judah Meech were charged with Lasing conspired to defraud the Wept of Eiiglaseel Fire Insurance Company. The evidence wad slot suttiiit nt to curtain the indictment for etot• !piracy. The 33.riaooers were therclere dlego;tfe.l. Tea pri soner Judith Meech was at once divehargi il, but the other prison' r (Wake ly) was ❑g .in charged with having attempted to obtain money, under todse pretences, from the said emu pany. The prisoner, who occupied a house on the Daniels ;Knuwle estate, in the periffi of Beaminster, had effected an i nsurance with the West of Rutland Insurance Company or 1001., and on the evening of the 31st of December his house wax discovered to be on fire. On some of the neighbours going to the fire they found the priwiner and hie servant standing quietly !outside the house looking at the tire. About 3SO pads films the prisoner's howe was a louse o cc upied by Joseph Meech and Mary Ann Meech. the former a distant relatse of Judith bleach, thcsery int of the prise, r. A small brook It owed between the proem, Ca boost and the house of Joseph Meech, and it would take about I nine or ten minutes to go from the one to the other. It ap peared that Ji eeph Meech and Maly Ann Meech hail ',pent the evening in qui stint at the prisoner's house. The fire happened at ab,ttt twelve o'clock, and one of the first men who came up was a man named Bowelitch, who asked bow tic fire happened. The woman Merest said that she did not kre.w, but that they found the house lull of smoke. Another. man shortly afterwards came up, and laved three chairs, a table, and the works of a clock. After the lire the prisoner made a statement of his loss; and when qtarstions were asked by the surveyor to the company as to the a xtent of his love, he stated that he had lost every thing but a few &nick, that had been taken to Mr. Meech's, and sin ell his wearing apparel, except what he had on at that time; and elms that his policy was bunted. On going to the house of Joseph Meech they discovered several bexee of clothe", a couple of bads ant bolsters, looking glass., sod other articles ef furnitore, most caretuay packed I mectioishene,reww,..itLtLie.,„l.7.lrzt.iclel.thaiydiAxa.retio twhaxtesohl:e.latl; from the prisoner's house during th'e tire. It also appeared that the inventory wltch the prisoner had furnished to the '1 office contained a list of articles which he valued at :iol. ' and corresponded in many things with the articles found at Joseph Meech's house.—Mr. Falwt.rds addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner.— the jury found the prisoner tiuilty. —Mr. Edwards then took several objections to the form of the indictment, in arrest at judgment.--The learned Judge raid he would consider the objectious and decide to-morrow ; morning. 11.! NORTHERN DIMCVIT.—Yoga, Marten It. ovn. sm.-80m Mr. Baron Alderson. SIIITH e. DEARLOTE —THE Il ItKOOATE INNKEEPER, AND wno to acre OVEnT.—Th , plaintiff is II gentle man who la. t summer took and occupied a house at liarnigate, next door to the Queried Hotel, w hich is kept by the defendant, against whom this action was brought, to recover the value of a carriage and some harness which were alleged to have bees illegally detained by him. The carriage and three horses were put up at the defendant's, and all went on agree ably until the 6th of December last, when the plaintiff was away from Harrogate, and his wife directed the servant to get the carriage in order that she might ride out. The ser vant accordingly saw the ostler, who informed him that his muter (the defendant) would not allow the carriage to go out . • Mr. Dearlove substquintly declaring that he under stood some legal proceedings had been commenced against Mr. Smith, and he had therefore determined not to allow the carriage to be removed from his premises.) This action was therefore brought to recover the value of the I, carriage and heroes , . Among the plsintiffs witnesses was aMr. Datiland, whose cross examination gave rise to con siderable nu rrimeut. Ile stated that he had been a com mercinl traveller for four years, hut had " left the road " in July last, since which time he Lad been living at Harrogate. He slept at " The Queen," but lived at Mr. Smith's, who paid his bill at the inn, lie was now waiting for better times.— Mr. Baron Alderson: Then you are a, waiter, now? (Laughter.)—At the conclusion of Mr. Badland's examine tiou, he stated that he seas still living at Harrower., in Mr. Smith's house, and his lordship sarcastically inquired when he expected Mr. Smith back ? Mr. Badland, amidst renewed laughter, replied, "in May next."—Mr. Baines having addressed the jury for the defence, his lordship summed up, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff—damages 301. POLICE.-YE:STERDAY. - - GUILDHALL —AN UN ORATEreL Itart•RN.—Mi. G, A. Young, a surveyor in Eagle-sireet, Red Lion-square, at tended to answer the complaint of Mr. Woodthorpe, the survey.r of the eastern district of the City of London, for neglecting to pay to him 21. 2s. as his costs and expenses pursuant to an award of the official referees of metropolitan buildings.—Mr. Young said 11- refused to pay this sum as ewes to the district sure( yor on the principle that those woo endeavoured to nerve the public ought not to be mulcted for their pains. In passing accidentally by America square he ohs. std the hoar-e, No. If. to I.e in a e , ndition daeeeroue to the public, and he gave notice to the district surveyor of the fact. The surveyor thought the building safe, but he (defendant) still thought otherwise, and brought the matter under the notice of the official referees, having no personal intenst in the matter at ell, and interfering solely for the safety of the public. He might see a huri.lred unsafe buildings in the costae of a year, but he could not be expected to give warning to the dis trict surveyor if he were each time to pay a couple of guineas for his trouble.—Mr. Woedthorpe said the case did not stand exactly as his friend had represented. Mr. Young would not have been asked to pay anything it he hod not appealed against hie decision. The surveyor for the owner of the house concurred with him that the building was safe, and so did the official referees, who were also pur veyors, and as thus tour surveyors were of one opinion the magistrates would believe Mr. Young was niong, and troubled them all unnecessarily. He had had vie ht at tendance s on the subject, and this might occur eve ry day, if it were not checked by ordering the payment of coats. He banded in the award, Lem which it appeared that Mr. Young had alleged that the building was in a dangerous condition, particularly as to the outer walla thereof, which were considerably out of the felpendieutar, the walls toward. America-square over hanging towards tire• public way to the extent of thirteen inches. Mr. Woodthorpe hot previously certified that the building wassecure, and the passengers M no way enelengered, but the official referees on receiving Mr. Young's atpeal visited the premises, and they decided that the house was not in a ruinous or dangerous condition, and that it was not necetsary to shore up. repair, or pull down the walls. And they awarded that Mr. Young should pay two guineas tor their expenses, and two guineas to the City surveyor.—The magistrates, alter referring to the statute, said their duty was only ministerial to enfl•ree payment of the award with out entering into its fairness or expediency. The fees must be paid.—Mr. Ald. Musgrove said the New Building Act was fiUed with openings for vexatious interference and enormous charges. and he hoped Mr. Young would suggest how it might be amended. He had been a great sufferer by it, almost to the extent of the loss of a freehold house.—Mr. Woodthorpe gave his fee- to the poor box. WORSHIP STREET .—PlatneeTAL CRUELTY.—/f - . H. Warren, and his wife, were finally examined. The case was first brought under the notice of the magistrate by a young woman named Mary Anne Block, daughter to the proprietress of an info, t school at Iloxton, under whose care the child bad been plan d during the day, and who had been , induced, from the numerous contustcris she had observed on its face and person, to speak to the female prisoner on the s ubject.—Mr. H. Green, assistant to Dr. Young, (legated to h a ring examined the child's person, which presented a mass of severe bruises, extending over the whole surface of the back. The child was also suffering uneler general ill- Llllll and debility, produced by the cruel treatment to which it had been subjected. At the former examination the male prisoner aonitted that he had been in the hsfvit of beating the child with a piece of knotted ! cord, which he k - ept suspended over the mantelpiece in hi., room, where it %As subsequently found by Holland, the warrant-otficer, who now produced it in court, and the medical witness expressed Ms opinion that such an instru ment was calculated to zbccasion the injuries ht had de- wribed.—Mr. Arnold said that he was very glad to be re. lieved from the necessity of offering any commute upon the conduct they had pursued. as he should send the case before ft jury, and require them hnth to fled substantial hail for it appearance at the sessions.—The prit.ners were com mitted in default. LAMBETH.—J. Williams and G. Smith, who had been charged on Monday with emitting to sack the shop of Mr. Creasy, a boot and shoe maker in Seuthampton.stn et, were again placed at the bar, and reognised by several *itemise* se having taken part with the mob in other reliberiee; and a part of the property found upon them was identified by other w itnesses than Mr. Creasy. They were remanded to Tuesday next, to be brought up with the others. 11.41.01tTANT TO PAWNPROILEM.—Messrs. Burgess, Grey, Burlton, and Wharton, pawnbrokers in the Camberwell and Walworth roads, again appeared before Mr. Elliott, in re ference to a quantity of plate and other valuable property belonging to Mr. Jones, a gentleman residing in Peckham, and which had been delivered up to the eflieeis on their going to the shops of the different parties with a search war rant to look for it. On the 4th of the last month Mrs. Stratton, the housekeeper of Mr. Jones, absconded from her situation, and, in a kw days after, her master re• ceived a packet by post containing upwards of thirty dupli cate s for plate, house linen, Ricci., wearing apparel, and other property belonging to him, and which were fIRWIIId at the shops of the above tradesmen. Mr. Jones gave infer motion of the robbery to the police, and every effort had been made to secure his housekeeper, hut in vain, and he then made application to have the property rector il to him. Sommen.es were granted to the pawnlerokers to produce the property. but they, under the advice of Mr. Humphreys, refused to do ao, and upon this search warrants were granted. A daughter of Mrs. Stratton was sworn to by the shoponan of Mr. Burgess so having pledged a portion of the property, and she was remanded till yesterday, when a seemed witnees was brought to identify her as having accompanied her mo ther to pledee mime Myer spoons, but this witness declared her not to he the same person —Mr. Elliott did not consider the evidenre given against the young woman sufficient to seed her fir trial, and therefore ;dismissed her. Ho also or dered the whole of the property, which was worth upward.: of 1601, and which was pledged for upwards of 301., to be delivered up to Mr. Jones, and this ass done. RAILWAY NEWS. The market ti•r shares wu extremely depressed yesterday. l's ices may be quoted nominally as before, without ogees or business. SHAItY. LIST.-LONDON, MARCH 15. Nont.-The .o.4:Rion:l ot Itscs In Roman characters denote actual tnak....:1.1 , ...; thuGc of lime Iti INA:, ..414x.5 . Wine. 'AID. LO :Aberdeen .„. ~ , . . 'l7. Lon..S.Wal.Netetill ,- 311 A Otberli.l2l 24.1. F.... 40/. .. l o I go,. Wel„4 6 Dudley 11 126 10 Do. Cons. 11•468.. AlDir. ltai. de S. Volces 4 .1.1. * Do. ,to. Tenth.... AI Ihrga. a Oxfued Jo. '2.1 I a Do. Thirds... .... . 1 1 , 8irk. 4 .. 6 i 14 La..., 8•141,..k reireit ,1.guean...1,10...••1tar 18. par a Nam. 110.41. st Mat. $.5 .. ar...h. , .001 1.:a..1er. ;1.6 .4. 104 tf0it.....10/.. Line:,. A, , ge„,raisits .... 1 *AL 13 ia. lawe.e . .Nr.l in Ilnektuelamashiro 51a0rt5......1 10 lOaiudooissi 'LW 1 I D Do. 1 5i5m0e......6 3ii IM. 4 sinters , 7. Do. New 1 . 1. r.l. I 174iCaren rdi ih.tykrwl :t 1 181. 25 p A ea . 6,.,...„ .. „A . ,., 12 Po. Peo:re...e 1.1. gar 7 I Do. d o 711. CY rents 4t. Do. do 141 Du.lirt tto4/ /ea. s i Do. Sapeid.Liseri 10 Do. 1.1(1., awe Q• 7121 Du. Grimsby Dna . 4 .-. . 0,817,81M.1.J•10e. 20d. 62., Ito. 4 1 400.,Lin.U0t. 1761DenodaLtdinitu l skta. 2 6 l Dune*. eb SoitAmbj.l. I U ,CAIII26I.LtEII I AL I III4 Ilk rthiland 18 I Du. del. E. .r 11.1. 1 64, tit Is Do. 401. Mane 3 .14,6 14.1 (tat aperri Il_ iiil• U Do. Zat/. gloms . In a llieen t eu Cuomo,. 13 t Ilk. Lk. Bieen.w Dertvl ils DuErts.4.l.l.lYel i t. iM 10 Do.C.lhrakßraipe • 4 Ds. .V. is ::4 1 lk.N , .rtn & Kooles, Lle II ; . p o .. do., du.. ..... 12, Do. t sae, as ...... 11l 13 i eto 1 lia.tie. II ral.tirialg , DA }. ass... ~,.... 14. lar .114 , Vossrasite .k Corns, au E.a.wirro. Ilmiare 12 11.. I *hue. ... I 11.8 I :•011.1.1:Lifb . 10 Do arar1d.61.01... . 1 3 U. I rd. D., th,„, 70 Do. do .... ~. ... .1 3 1 21 4 2 64 Do. Cares . M East Doenuairs... ,7 01. i Do. *xtenaton • 12 De,. New. . .' 7 6 . 1 . 12 Liu. intrita 24 Do. New, i ii.d . ris.j l Id. 'i tut. 50ri0D...... , iff oast Idoothishire . 45 4 Id 6 i /A,. Nor. lot. ~. re Eillulswzha tillmit . l:i'l 6 ' 1!o. Cut . Op • el. I 6 a. I sa.ra ...... 1 .1. is Do. Est. sp. Cenl.l, Ili Du. * shares ...... 10 $ Do. do. Wormer V. I 26 fediu t i. et, le..etliern . 4N. Car of lblion . I 11 Emir', raved. Dsre. l 2 IP I 2 North& Sfh. 0 .01,0 par 113. 1 01 C Nerthern......4 l 4 4 13 , 5 orth StaftueNttre .2 ilit li Do. York Ea • 14 ?I; N,rll, Western . STI Ottleirth 3. 3:cattier/ 16n,* . I ) i 0.01.40 A Wide. 18 lid. too Ur North Of e.n.1..1 , - , ' 27 7 lleade..Gulld. 1.11.4. 2' g W. N ew , 4el ; 46 60 1 , li Royston and Ditch in :4. tor Al Do. New, ...d. . 1 36 3 1 4 6 • 26 Scottish lintrol . ... ki 'AI iis 0 .. No , Lg. .:: :1 ,3 1116. Zi Statists 1111.11.04 ... 06 Orem Waratru e 3 SW, Ratk.,t44...ND 42 44.1. .0 Do. 6 shares , 62. __. 7 1 Do. do., So. Di.... 17; Ik, i k... 311,... ll ot 1 1 PR 7 asnros.t Dir.elsos A 1 10 Do. Fittlai ' - 0 1 4 Do de..... ... .il I.i 2ed. to Do. New, M..- 1 3 4 i 16 ine.cesekGne,Nl . l'. 1 r - it. p. tg iliwidens.. l i.l2une.iim PM 8 i Do. ihoreee ...... lil. it' 6 I Do.. -lo n Vards ..‘ .. 1. , 64 i i • lsnasley 6,.liii.il. W 111311 and rivroy ..... ..sii I i Do. New 4. r t. Prrf .1 lik 111 Do. sewers 4 4 6 '0 20 6 Isi. b ;'! fr " , "Zi e. •-- • 121 Do. t Ayres 1181111411 , n w r . ylt. s lA mir 1; 1: s Si * * 10 10a ll 71:4:01 ... ... 4 ei IS Do. Preferenne. • 1 111 DuErlele.ticsal:Witi 4 iSertg6 Sturonrshireo 3 24- '0 ILard. it Corliste . • 1 5 49 13 SouthEastariat Ion:. 233 434 1 1 DA 72irde ......2 4 . 4 44 14 Du. do.. ....No. 1 -116 I 'Lancashire &Yorks. I . n . I: Do. ea. No. 216 Std. I Do. du. •• • •••• I. . 1 10 Du. du. ... 3 lug Po. 6 m.„,..; il s 4 d• 71 Do. do T . ti.A. • • 4141 t Do. 1 aArreir 1 24 - 21 South Wales „.. . . 311.1. 130. Irtftlo 3 62ork.Dune.•Dirtdel* De. Sisk...WU .; • 9. * 11 , 4 Dow Yrs& Extesason• .19 Std. Do. Thirds Iltrirt.i• ids ll' Manses Doren, Deli 13 Lid. Do.Liverstek mini 4 rat kaventh_...... I Do/Doldortrtotr 14 Whiten.nnt Ilona; it 11114.00n..ev Wernal, 4: ll'in. ritoritig. datia o • ' LBErrastaalYl 4 4rn i .•Gt 29 York, Neoo. 4. Dor. 30 9' Do 6 Owes s . „A . 2 , 26 Do.ortr.Nowe &nor 25 7J '0 Leeds aka tfraldfrls .1.' 4 bg 15 DuEl.NolYlooNs 16 416 ,! flo76. l _..CYtt ' .e f it a. .:61. 40 ~..,4 4 „ od . 4 „j r44 . . i 2.1 NAL l a 1 Mt Do. New ,llO 17d. n PotiNElturor Pen 8g 2 , ..,,.,4 6 ,. 5 e,-, 6 6. 1 142 50 TcekiNorthllidiand 61 2 41 LadS.Dern.,Muncl. 19 Do. Pre/urea./ . 11l • Lis.. lien. k N.Jn Is Do. E..k11".1(40.N.i. 24 tip 2 11,18.,&..808,.f..'00).8 1 Wei . Pomo, netts/aro. ILD Landon /6 Illaelorale..i 1.... 01 laws ke3m a I t Ander. 2921 1 MI De. Nor. • .Nor. 2 sZt Elm id irestalfre.tOrat Vat to 3d. 174 Dm EgimilVA t ~ 74 Demerara 63d. WLem, llitirluom B.a 11/1 302 a t &WA Maest(sh si AL ~,, D o. (4,,,,, E,;pAtA,. 22 $O4. 14 Lust Indian. ~It 1 9 Dv. d 0 .C.0r 0 p1.2.. II Lowsminal Is Mont,. b 10 Der.Preillle.ep.O. 44 44 7 facreadmeru Vs De. do. 1624 ......44 46 66 Namur and Lfege 124 London and I.;lernet. 10 Northern of Franca . 22 4 i 4 le; Do. Preece:net net... 6 Orleans t Bordeaux 1 iie Lerotnn -• N. kresteri, 130 4. Over Yang 1 24. 22 Da * Wows L.de I, 64 76p. in Paris and Lyons 2 ho. Now .. ...... 12 Ju Parts land Orleans Du. FIRM . . 6 7p. to Parts sod Rouen- l0 2 , D 4.4443.. i.iai. e Mei. awl Struts/are I 7, D0.1.6.41.,61.k D. a,lO au Konen an.) 11.11 Te 4 lit ) D0.1id.ih.,31..H. t• 10 to itaiatire and M. 11.0. 4* 5 1 . D0.1utrtb.,11.403 813 g • rear/ canal Nantes . 7i 61.1. fiu Loodonatkolorturn. 364 Sy Irser Fiatortrs , 8 7,1. 11,110 . 0, MARCH 11.-11m1In, Hamburg. al; Ditto Prior Atom. Four and a half per Ctuat.,lls; Cologne. 44 holm. 07 MI ; Neekkeihurg, 3u' altona, Kil, art VIRNNA. NlAttell 4.-Northens. el ; C10t...11e. 82 ; Venice. Milan. in; Le:born. 524; Taal, 01; ethos's. 12; Apennine, 931. RAILWAY BILLS IN PARLIAMENT. ADMIRALTY REPORTS UNDER PRELIMINARY I.N4rlatE6 Acr.-Desnea Ann frame 8.,, woo (Donors .11,eninr).-11e ob. jest of that bill is to connect this railway with • proposed &nation ot the Dundee and Arbroath Railway, by which memo MT uninter rupted oomniunication by railway would Ye completed from the tooth to the north of (Irma lintain. For this purpose a deviation is pro posed to be made at a point dietauit about one mile (rota the Dundee and Perth Railway terminus, and the line is proposed to be carried through the town of Dundee on a viaduct, crossing various streets and communication. leading from the town t 1 the harbour. AP the proposed works are to be carried landward of a line of railway al read) constructed, the Admiralty has no observation to make brroad imposing a condition that openings similar to thow Made in the ihintlee and Perth Railway be cairn - nett,' ahould the Admiralty require it ; but they deem it accomory to point out that the free communication with the hsrleinr 10 threatened by the projected lin , . Their lordialips do not overlook the importance ut • through cominunimtiun to the public at large; but theyare decidedly °tot/mien that this should not be attained kionowo critter on the pan of theharbour orduckr,on toe iroprovementof which such largo sums of money hare been expended. With these obgirra lion% and trier, in; to the evidence taken on the prelimtnary inquiry, they leave the ease m the handset( the house, perticutat ly ealtnigtheir attention to toe importance of preferring, tutimpete6l, the co:tie:lmin. Won betsetn the town and the hag hour. DI:NUNN AND ARBROATH RAILWAY DPNEIEE J CNC cam,). - 11.e division of the Lords of the Admi ralty in this case was similar to the above. LONDON, BRIGHTON. AND 801:1 It COAST RAILWAY (Enrs.n , aon or 'l)vw., &c J.-The object of this bill, as far or tbe Admi ralty is concerned, is to alter the bridge over the river .trun, by roduc ing the opening. The surveying °niter was informed by the promoters that it was their intention to abandon the project; therefore no inquiry was guile mto. 'the Lords Comm) goner, of the Admiralty object to the proposed alteration of the bridge, from a luvigable opening of sixty fret L. tine ol only forty feet. MONEY MARKET. :2 F.I. - 2O lu otd. .24 ~~ i~4 is 1!.4, rj It 19 1.71 I II; v., Ito 14 4.5 jar l&L pr la WEDP:LSDAT EVLNINO. The market was quiet this morning, with little' business doing until the afternoon, when letters front Paris announced a number of failures; erroneously one of astounding magnitude, that of Rothschild and Co., and this in the face of the circular from that firm, noticed in the Daily -Yews of this moruiug, announcing their inteutiou to close their business. this was only the hundredth of the reports of the kind ab.iut that powcrful firm, which has butt so freely reflected on, in conjunction with other money I derangements. The credit of the Ro•lischilcis cannot be called in question. The three firms are totally distinct, and there appears to be no doubt that that at Paris will very soon wind up its affairs. Report has said that the Rothschild@ of this city have given notice of action against the Morning Post and other papers for the publication of the news from Paris. That great firm will, we are assured, deal with the matter otherwise, and as an accident of the day. In the times in which we live such accidents arc unavoid able. Consols have undergone little variation to-day. They left off 801 to 1 for money and account. Ex chequer Bills, 28s. to 31s. premium. India Bonds, 9s. to 13s. premium. The approach of the settling day caused more acti city in foreign stock. Prices, however, remained without material change. Spanish Fives were 11; to 12; the Threes, 22 to 3. Portuguese, 14; to 151. Dutch Two-and-a-Half per Cents., 41 to 3; the Fours, 60 1 1 to 5. Mexican, 141 to t. Brazilian, 68 to 70. We have had the following correspondence about Peruvian affairs submitted to us: The following is the memorial regarding which Messrs. G. 11.. Robinson, 1, Cape!, and W. P. Robertson, on the part of the Peruvian bladhollers, had an interview with Lord Palmerston. The memorial was nuenerowly and moss Irespectably signed: I My Lord,—We, the underiktnad, creditors and reproientaire. of creditor,. th e sta. ci rem, virtue of holding ita.it And re. oitralaed bonds, beg respectfully to lay berme your iortlanip brief statemcnt of the wrongs which for Year , we have run , red prom that republic, in tba hope that you will .Ind the case ace legitimately for the prompt and active inten:nenCeot her fkcsirs ventment. In 1522 and 152 J the republic of Pau borrowed in this country the conjoint capital amount of 1,816,0001„, engaging t o ne , the {coders an annual inter* st of 6 per mot , and to prosaic a .inking fund for the extinction of the capital itself. Pining the twentyea veers which loin , intervened time the major mr: or the town was contracted, Pero has never remitted one forth either to pay the interest or to extinguish the api taL lier creditors waited long and patiently in the teliel that the went of means wits the nnly hot to en hoot, wattle fulfilment 01 the micron obligation entered into by the republic; at all times expreiping t h e * nodulera to listen to soy propomis fic a new anangerrent of their claims, tending to facilitate art equitable adjustment with Peru. Mat. tars remointsl in this unsatisfactory poeition till 1841, when a new muter of richr• to Peru npearre up, enormous Lod alined inhofinits in mould, and wholly said exclusively state property. This was the deposits in the Chinches Islands of guano, which has since become so celebrated as a mai:Jute in England. Now tins use of wraith being drawn exclusively from England itself, and ahsoluttly unrealisable withoat its concurrence, weir. that this is the only courary wpm, guano is ust d to any e tent, the creditors came to the naturai concha. sion that the neeessary part of the proceeds would forthwith be lap. plied to the toyment of the loos deferred aunt ticamatilated debt due h o ndijohicre try the van r. Mut your lontshfp wilt hove horned with 'mem lee from the committee of South Amy stemt boaultuiders, that while Po rot is reaping a rich harvest fro., this white Ate is deriving from it in England, and in Logi:oar. alone, rat t ee ,. than 3 11,10011 annually one and above her ordinary erveous, the creditors appear tiny day to be as far from wayrino top, or of them debt, either in whole or in part, as tM y were twenty.eix !tan Iss. In the mast eatiniatous and nefarious manner the executive rpm. writ of Peru continues to make contr. et oler contract with foreign horses In Lilo:4 which advance the whale proceed, there, and oaks the guano for .ale to their friends in Lotahm, just r,s if Vern had no claim of any Mal ugainst her here. Ore 11011, Pt contract inolod nor made in London be the Petrel. Minister Plerepotyntiaty, on be a n of his gorernmeni ; but it was indignantfy scouted hy the b eim wholly and entirely on the ground that out of 500 , 1 • 0 01. to be 14 within two years to Peru, the moderate sum of 120,hut•an reserved for the longeimifering awn. ay. Indeed Pent has taken ap, end eitantelesnly sturouts, a line of nuch unblushing tergiyersen„, homed sublet ftige, and wretched chicanery, with her eredimee as to Irate no hope whatevt ref the slightest attention briny paid to their claims, unit. peremptorily enforced soil matted by your lard. ,drip, as her Majesty's NI illiiter fur Foreign Aldim Ta wards this end rour lordship has the Among groand in equity to go Upon, that the government Jera, d a d e . eroe in 1842, ortletiug that one half the proceeds of the guano should be aphropriotcol to the payment of the Wodhokime, Anil that your lordsh p may he entirely ratisfi,l, not only do e equity but of the legality also interference in our Is half, on the pat on her klajeett's executive, we beg to toe lathier your bolhip the following literal translation of a law passed by the national r„ mute. ofUte Perovams or the 21nt 0 tuber, 1515. Art. 1. "The executive chill religiously fulfil, in all their parfa, the contra ts entered Una with individual., hatitimil it foreign, at yy hatmer tots restarted, or by icludever executive adjusted. Art. 2. All the contracts Much have been made with constitutional administrathms shall have., priority of payment, oommeneing v ilk the older:, art forowirs the Oder of their dates while the contracts adjusted with proms, mints de facto atoll fol low on the same prinelpfe." This law wa s promulgated with the wool formalities et the leeintotare ; and tV contract mode with the Brit-la creditor, et:aniline first in print of time, and having been entered luta under a canstitiatemalg.w.. merit, is first entitled to payietsit by We Pt-N..1. i iee , e27. Your lordship will be prepared to la or that the drop of the executive, and the 12 , V of the legislative gm.. menu of Peru In favour of the heraiholders, have trained, as they doubtlens were intended to remain, a dead letter. Indeed, the Nlinister of !Innate, in nn oili Yoh but &ow. s wy =lto anagram on the 23 rd November Lint, uses U - me words:ss. use heaven is bent on making us unespectolly - tick, that bin reason oh,. cur Merlin credit's,' etaial , l be tmtallt Lent :mom main tin tamers 11.4 dly puor." We trust we It.M . 1113,C oat -orb •C. Si will Mame your lordship oltleholly to aohni is. Me. Pitt Adam, hee Mejatty's lit: oraff.fires its Lima, to thriond aymest ol oar elainv. In Wet we place implicit ronlth nee, $c he has ever disphiyed x ul, judgment, and alilsy, in nein:do:og the rights of Witisly subjects , wot never he has lase. milol or, to ...des..., flVc are taken the liberty, nay fort rf raring a ecatusesee hum oar buds . , to transmit this ate memorial to your lordstep, oral totes teit yeses will admit the nutrias,' of that committee, as a deputation, tome honour of pertonal interview, at shich t eery additional odurmatkot which your Wedahip &Mee rill mod readily be adurded.—We Lace the Wow - to be. ale. ifieLISH per et C 0... *moo el: 11 gh Long Anne., :10 Years, exp. Jan. 5, I+•t,. el 7, od labs Moods, L 1 . 009. 9 I.i ten. POREPIN !e, runt. Umeilhif fnmols. Pitt.. New Wool, terao ant 310, .2 Ditto Small. ;15 2 d per Cent. Hoer.. Ayres Alta , . I', 1 per et. Weteolos IWs., thi 1 per et. Grenada 1111.., IN 13 A iro 'lce. M . c ij ‘ nr.isi l r ' ett ' 3ll l 4o 3 per Ct. Portman,. hoodoo. WS If: FUND& Inak I:orta , on4er ,C 1 .4 16.13 Con-.ls 1.. r lift.. L. 443121 31 Y1::(1/14. 4 (1. Krtnnat.cr...0.4,14114 I 111+s sloknl-4 Dis.tras Nov.. WO, IV 11 3 per c, Mod. tlp, Ct. Ir± 31 per Ct. Dutch Evicur, , c,l•l(ld., 4:4 : 4 2 ; 4 lII.T Ct. CC, E-XCIIAIWOES AND BTOCK4 ABROAD. Batiettwtw. 34 ttctt 14.-1~ of 1844, 7to Ditto, lift, 67; ihth, 183r1, &I: Ditto of the City, 1341 Vi; ikink of lielZhioh CO, &thaw LOD , IOO. 26 35. A stwitit r, NI Aat tt IL—Exchange an LOW3orl. 35 17! 15 two moot* 2.113. ll *too M tag 11.--Sprtnish 1 Aniohlo, Conk, I.: Ekeilailge• :CL Daer-hoht, March 4, three toontte, 5.32; WI., Mnrch 4, three mouth., 374 37. WIRINA, hi SIWII B.—Flee per Cent, 01; roof' per Cott,. 71; Thee nee Cents., ; Tw0...1.11.1f per Omit., 43 ; Um, 1634, 136 : MIL Itm., tca ; hook chore*, 1,101. COMMERCIAL AND MARKETS. PRODUCE. MIWPI NO. L sxr, Mducn Li.— The Sugu snarttt and - Iran, dull ; 320 libt'.. Weot 1114;3 ant, add. I,sol.bdes ealow lluvau wet e offered in ptl l .ll. +tale, but to oily all e tot book in by the insportero, for want of putehawro, at pies into rates. Alma I,oon Multi. of t have berm sold by owe home by prlnde amine to-day, di% Wed among the trade, Voce.% and 'Anent ; the Plitegkee not tranopind, hut understood to be under 400., and preeurned tole at nnhcr !once prima than had week. hearted dull ; eland ad quality, .I.le. bd.—Cottle : 1,21 W bag" of good 01.1in:try native Cey:on oda public rale e2o. yd. ; a part at 330., which was nearly le. more that the public oak• prier of the , week *foie List, but about the primal contract prier of the last few days.—Cocon, ; bags Tani* offered, n molt port only mold 46e. to 114.—Saltpetre a low kla fraction 5, rola in public ale at 3.15. (Id. ; the remainder borgiabi at that rate.— lii dull, without alteration is pnoer.—Tdisw bees In Improved demand. sod is lino at :oth. ikL—Cottaa, Ade— ltunt, Mostly. —Tea t the pobila asks, acaaniatiew of :15,004 eomnecneed to-day, and went air brushy ; 11,501 named &mi l l i : l , l Z 1,400 package. only told, which aid out alter general quotation. Doty pail on ,usar to lain week, in Loudon, Liverpool, eat. Briotol, Hull, and the Clyde To the 114111 e pal.: 'atot year . Lwow.. —..... —...............-..... ..... 54133 owls Pll am Ts• at ISO To Lur intim. lb o. Lovidon ...................—........................—... ...... . 3,341,124 Liverpooi .... .. .... . —.... 1,0 3 0,737 Bri.tol Bull Clyde Total .. 00,441 r 90,649 8080 Woe la ...— Immo COTTON.—LirsaPooL, MAACK 15.—Tbe ziarket was eery trlnceay yaaerlay, sad the teadaser leas dadeverd. bat dal quotallous easalut be altered. The mks erne Mee bake. SHIP PING INTELLIGENCE.—XtiLe. ALL MLA MS. WS. AM DOZ. AWL MI» 9 Dublin Or If °thud U 0 Indlitor.Suals 0 Sadnett.NOW 0 2 Waterfowl 1 Ocanwhwito 1 Hearn./tJere OO Lisbon...... 0U 14,40.01 and U Weetlellar. II 0 Ffambum ll .Marron.. U lianfat Mar.% lawn SOO GKAVI.V.D, MAGCR 15.—Arrived Probe, Swath Seas; Mama. Oporto; Ann hall, t. John's; Batarier, Rotterdam; Item., Bre. men; Sir R. Hanks, Ostend.—Sailed : Comm, North ; Brother% R. Thomas; Marnanue Trinidad; Triton, Ostend; Count, of Lansdale, Hamburg; Giraffe. Rapid, Rotterdam; Columbine. Howe; Challenger, Cdtdiff, Re. ; New Mop; Oscar, St. rhea; aim, Harlingen ; Northumberland, New York; Gazelle, Copenhagen; Arreprindw n. Ndrw .y ; Scotland, Clyde; Murtha Max, Regtael; l'apita, Bilbao; 11.1triett, Newfaumiland. I.terneori, Mani a IS.—Arrived: Sarah Sands, New York. — Sailed Foinnatitb, Bombay; Flint, Trieste ;'Ann Lest, Coquizaba; hero, Rio Janoro ; sutibeam, Breton ; Wirer, Gibraltar; Nimer CaLutta; Stuart, Solite; Thomas Broallebank, Catguts On Anger, lsomniy. The John toil lipberl, from IRMA% woo wen en sbote un lattle ClineWl. Feb. 10, by the Cha-hate, arritaal at Mobile. Marc,he from Caille to ..onto Video, ,truck on English hand, in January. Oder Majesty's steamer Harpy proceeded (non Monte Vides to her awatatanee. Her aj-ety's pteket, Ironi Rio Janeiro, at Male Video, with the Noeember mall from England. [Adverti,ement]—A SEVERELY BRUISED AND IFIR NOLO iA.I. cram. By HOLLOW/3 . 3 013171/.31 . .n 'Hugh mtwe t t of Kit inline. a shipwright. when working nn a revel, 'truck ieg 3 330-t violent b'nw, whi-h intlieted ii ilresiPul wotuad and n severe Noise; the limb immediately turned b.wk, tbt ankle to the hip. All applications to it for weeas had no pima to heal the wound or disper.c the bruise. Ihe buffeter, hating beard so much in praise of Holloway's rentment and pill c determined ad trying them, and fortunately be did, for by their use alone his Ind was cured, and M a ninth he was able le resume hi+ work. sold by alldruggists, and at Professor Holloway's Establishment, a -47. A London. HIRTHA. REA R13.-31arel. 12. tt I Irinvdrao. the nfe of &nal, Erg., of a .ret ALM( EN }: V.-M Loch IJ, the wife of J. i lilakeno of Morniacont road, of a daught T. uoybEN. -March 12, at Rrompton. Kent, the wife of J. &APIs% I):ll 3 ii?. f tV. - : n r...fi 12. at Marlton'. r , W. 3 3 '0. o l a II ALL.- larl. 11, at Ilareow, to ore .1 PT. Hall. of a daughter. lIEN DElt t at/ N.-Mar.:ll 11. at Winehe-kr.place, Penton , Ilk, the 1014 of A. llendenewt. 1.5. q., of a moo, .41111.0nt. 110 V 11.-Marels 13. at Maruata, tho nife of R. linen, E.4...f a.nn. RtiFIANA.-Marell n, at Lake Vale, Cheeldre, the wife of 1.. herr" 11, at Hunter-et:vet. Erunrr .aarquare, the wiled IL 14ver, E.g., of a -on. MACLEA)..-Nlareh 1, .the wife of A. Nadeau , Ewa A 11 , 1,431,44 Stoke Newlortoo...l 4 niehter. a mu PAR Kt:R.-March 11. at the wife of J. Parker. F.A., of SI M 1440 N -larrh 13. at Glargon. MM. Sinuaon. of a stlll.aten WIULE.-March 14, at Piml iARRI co :Ir.A. OES. Weale, of a &web:o , I CAW P114.1.L-CAMPIINI.;,.- Mareh S. at Tret-haous ty the RP. Dr. boric, J. Carm4fell, fourth fon of 1. Carrpl,ll. E.t.a Juno to Mary...cowl daughter of G. J. Campbell, Ems., of Cooed and Troerkeinks DEIGHTON--JOIINSTON.-March 13, at at. )fordo" , Chanh..lea no, b) the Rev. Gene:o %Seine. (Jounce Robert Ireijdon. Kwt. R.N.. to Anne Matilda, daughter of Wm. Johto.ton, Rag., of Sem Churdter noose. Co ttttt ELLIOTT-14RAN 01:11-31areh 14, at St, John., Southwark hi lb , Me,. It. I:rander. of Ifilltnorton. Calue. the Rev. W. till aft. M.L. Upper Raker orcet...Rtgeut . •••inrk, Tbereet tldert duttltate of W. A. 'trawl,. L.A., of at. John, a.mthwark. FITZGERA Lll- ELW Eft-Ka:eh 11. at Brlghtoorl , the nee. C. J. Barnard. that. Fit,erakl, R.M., flo, ern, of Voter,. Aoarars. to Eleanor Caroline AralreilL tlattgtner of U. C. Llrrer, tr 4 l.. of KM , ' town, Mt:ham. ROOK-BELL.-Month 14. at At. Game', Ilaarner.equerc. 4 3 - the Ilex. J. W. .byre. M.A., C. Rack Req., 311.13-col. to Wary. xeoo.l.laoghtel of the late Capt. IL Kell, of the Hon. Ilto'oon Ray Cow .Serrlee. TIIOIIAIO4ONI.I*RTIN.- 31 ereb 14, at Walton ,Ir. J. C. Thomarem, 11.14emook to Margaret, only daughter of the kat J. LUrtln, DEATUR. ADAMS.—March 8, 3faJor 11. H. D. Adam , . formerly 1.0m56 1 ar Romiitlng Staff of Coeds. aged 72. BOPli IN.—March 16. Sarah Sophia. the u're Bod kin. Ksi., of Maesneld - strect, Ca,udishsquart... harristeratdon aged 65. DFAX.—March 13. at Ileathicl limn e. ,).tn. B. Bain. 1011811:1d—)larch 11, at Thetford, Alm Forgo . , Ishtar of 11. not , Esq., of Eau 6.. aged 53. 11. at Cambridge, Con, wife of A. 11. Trot, EA.. M.A., ared 26. HA FIA M.—Mamh El. at Glasgow, Mr. W. Graham. acrd at West Mallhig, Alice Elizabeth, daughter of 17 T. Luck, Esq. 31088.—March 8, at Sclera Bank, Monastgrdnre, 11. 320- s. £64. aged 56. SAMKMartth 13. at Illaekboatli, Mar) Ifarrict, >one rot daughter 01 the late Rec. J. 11. hams, of 1180' St. I.thound Suffola. 13311T11.-31 anch liftsings. Capt. R. so n S 54th Best , all °l the la te W. T. Smith. , Beheld Clvil ice. STURGEON.—March Ix. at lier,nertun. Frog rich George Wente , Sh. strunzest son of Sturgeon " . ..on'. . WARSEK.—March 11 , at grt..u.n Ilan, nor 13...1 , ..rth, B. Bag., aged 61. MILLE% 031. GT—March 13, at the Great M or, war Pratier.harn, T. WILSOX.•-MlirCh 12. at Brighton, FAzabeth. thc hint of 11. Wines tisq.. of Mint all 11mise. IPWtlif4l iLtl.l 01 AN s o tomoo.o..erat. Oo /A.o room, •Oo Wes jAmbera..nes.,. Ile peec4d ;0 0, ..rit a 10 4 i•••• 41 ;C,