The Express. — London, England, 1852-04-21 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS.—TvzsDAT, ATIUL 20. The home met at 4 o'clock. ROYAL ASSENT. The royal assent was given by oseasieslow to the Marino Mutiny, and five private baba Tho Love Melton were, the Lord Chancellor. the Marquis of Be bury, and the Marquis of Eimer. PETI LIONS PRESENTED. By the LORD CHANCELLOR, from articled clerks in Msuehester sod Birmingham, praying that they might be allowed to set AA advocates in the county courts. LAW AMENDMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL. On the motion of Lord RID1111)All, this bill was read a first time. PATENT LAW AMENDMENT (No. 2) BILL. L or d COLCHESTER moved the third reading of this bill. After a few words from the Earl of WALDIUWAYI and Lard Cam , the bill was read a third time. A clause was added on the motion that the bill do path BISUOPHIC OF QUEBEC - BILL. On the satiate' the Earl of DaaaitT, this bill was read • third time C E OINVE OF MAIrNOOTII. The Menials of CLAN HICARDE said that about a fort night or throe weeks ago a noble nigl, who was not then in his plate, had pet a qui sties of a similar nature to that of which be had given notice, and which he was shout to put to the nide MI (Derby) opposite. Ile (the Margni. of Claintharde) was not in the house when the gaieties wee pat, ea the occasion to which he had referred ; but he mut my that be had read the answer which we. give* with they meet metthishment and alarm. (Hear, beet.) Ti. question was one of great and serious importance; end had been so represented in that house and in ether places. It was me with respect to which it was im possible that the coentry could be left without some clear and decided understrialsg. The act by which the endow ment of the College of Mammoth was made permanent, in stead of being mealy es oessal grant, was proposed by the Ildble coil (n‘rbY), sad hi (the Marquis of Clanricanle) was astonished at hearing that there the any hesitation on the par , of the gOtert=7.: to ......e woe. taintless with respect to that institution were. (Hear, woe... The ques tion we. one of importance, infinitely greater this that of allowing the sum of 26,0001. a year to a collegiate establish suet. It had been represented as of great unporteace by the noble earl opposite in 1845 la that year the arable earl said, " Noble lords asked whether this maroue was to stand sloth ? He replied that this was M be taken by itselt ; but at the arise time to be taken as an indication of the future conduct of the government. The government desired that this measure should he considered in the eye. of the people of Ireland as a manifestation that the goverment had re solved to treat them with conciliation and in a spirit as ho nourable to their Roman catholic fellow subject. as to any other portion of her Majesty's subjects. This was not to be treated ae the harbinger of future TOVISUft . ; but as an in. dication of what would be the conduct of the recessing towards Ireland. He believed that it would he so received in Ireland." (" llear, bear," from the Earl of Derby.) The answer which had recently been given by the noble earl was to thi.cffeet—that there was no intention of altering the endowment of the College of Maynooth be the government at present—that qualification "at presen t , was a most im portant qualitication, for it must induce doubts in the minds of every person who heard it or read it whether there was not some intention of making an alteration with respect to the College of Maynooth. If be had had niegiviap when he read the answer of the teethe earl, he bed gnaw stir giving' when he reed the epee* of her Majesty's Illeilabor General, undoubtedly a gentlest. at unisessie—peethe- Maori and parliamnta ry The spode of Sir Them 116111 was very pregnant. The boa. sod leaned gestlemes What I feel it myekily le my te pea upon that iniriet is this,—that although so sus wen be son velailest, say, no man would man steadily nem than I wand to he a'party to any act, basigner expediest.beweverjust a urae grounds, by which Me mei faith of metiament migdelliethelis promised, yet I sheWsupport aid sordidly tommot. the motion for a tomminee of isquiry into the water aallials norm atteadieg that omit, di e Wee h about to be heeright hare the Meese it Oemmese. (Cheep.) Ma M. gesdemen. es the rem* ef the tontines of that ems matte, and as the neon of that committee, it shell be found that, combitistly with the good faith of pees Memest, aid sesetiteuly with what become. all paha MS tesimersa arise heseer and integrity with their U. low-ecieoomies. his piodbie to put an end to that grant, I for one shall rejoice is alatturriog with the government, et which I am an unworthy member, In an act entirely to put mad to it." It oppoired to him that Sir F. Kelly bed des* expressed the minion, that if it were pmeible tl i at ma end to the College of Maynooth, he had reams to t that such a mann would meet with the morn - ✓ase of the goverment. Did it set appear that them was Some oestraet, and that the governs's* woe amine that then sheen be gems isquiry for the porton of assarteda kig whiner nay send not nisei themselves Gem Met mama er eagegemeat ? He null set mow to lay ether eesdesies this that the BelleisesOmegel dielen to 11= k rikrto kn ow tha gm er i athe sim il t i n e t= ent to the lea. and learned gondemes bed adverted? It woo ems al which the geniummt had net given any =settee; ad theybed set eves mairred that it was handout to brtag es* a modes hrwerd. Ile taw hem the votes of the Hier of Otowesse that Mr. Smoiser lid given notice that es Thorns/ be would sum Ise a .diet eammittoe to Mph" not tate eon integrity siatiost sr sigegemeet , or any smilies of the er good aith of oesitamest. bat te itt _imply as to the state of einotiga la the Cap of Musson. Tide queedom was dhemerd in 184.5, gad es that omit the sells earl asks) did not meth that the MB Aran be %listed ; lathe moved that a assatittlie amid be to bags he es to the system of siseitiell et May ate*. That preseides was mropeold the sale earl ri neelotod (Derby). lie (the Mimi of Cleidem ie wee set saying rase word as to the "has of the mane to obi* the Bob eitesdeneral bed selemed ; but this wee a matter in which the gewommine might not to leave thogrZ t a m e AWL (Bear bees) The easeaseemest of ef the mmersiest set to has. boss mob to the per • of tholisM bet is pediammit. Ti my est the gesinsest mil woos hewn by some teremet is beep op es helltudia Thigh thsy vele* ether grin MS, le put as end te. wet ageopmities "hi* be amid sit admit ; emd le ray that mamma mad set lweitute es Swirl would boptehedi elerial The ems weinet to ar gued in MO. SO MOM Pod this Wind them manes ware open to parliamesS-gusidy, to hien dap so they wan—to Satin Mai toltsreagt—ar Ss mita that Saitutios men elfeiu.l. lie had adapted the latter awn Lao rase hither smash the adds len mid be had se Mat Mss the sone sad wean mon Is s theight. lima mamma the gaieties whisk be woo "dog to pat M bk.. wady, TIM WOW the Steatites of tie emensiont ' so to the meintinesee. or putting as end to, the Cellos Tho o 4 Mit Vf D ( Erl ;f lew ' ) mid ) hods. I eat envy that the noble morquie was set is Me Mem when the gamin was pest Mme on a hewn tenelea, he I sada this ame year lordships the remakes, in substance, of the semi matter. In the bat place, I believe that the sawn which I did give es that emesdes wee sot precisely that which was quoted by the said mash. My answer wee on that it was set the tannin of the neat to any alteration with regard Op Me et Ma at present, but Net bar 'mity's govenmeest so present 'sissies of peopelegmty thenties I. the state of the Law with nand to So Osiliego of Mayan* ; and I added to that aliamant dist. sesedidme. I mum observe that the attitude whist bad boas Ines by Roman catholie chunk owl the mirk le 111111111 it appeared to have wiegreed. wain mitt to the nib cultic. of them who aldosol to dohs& the teslisumee ef the grant. (Demist evils at . Korb leme.l Ity Iteds. I must may also that the rillerallp el tbitstallas Mat Ises• amasses will be mimildisehhy braced by the apes* of the noble imersio eapielsr—fhier. Mere are two mem* only ups it ea net; the first mend is that of gamml whey. cad the mood that of geed hhl. deo, oith nein to the woad mol dist width r bane 1 the meta poem* St I tali a liege pieties ef the_ potpie of met a orestey m use* to madise a rest whisb h son ropugmat M sid i gi=(liete. lager); ig o=rll to thee mom* *News the smotha g=odhillo alispenw. NA rem to thing that psalmist is In as isseet b.O to eistinee the poet by sty enlgolles. The sent smisode near the Behan of azMasi OD Obi C s the assollem of sr emeernes uo gnat mo em the ... , bee bees to the perstmemesta m e d die w r k rag M Siam milholle verbena et the Qates's &minims a =sad theologied odseritles ; ain In fie hope Mot sodo liberality sa the part of parilemist eadinued from yen to year, ad siniemed by a pennant iseatmest is 1645, mend pierloos the Mena gash the* might be expected is se isightemi end welbeinested priesthood; well ellional to the trews mil to Me eons city of the country, mid dimmed to etilltsite the petaeiples of charity sad letheneemee, of poste maw all Mange of the maple, duelled loyalty to the arm, and Meedieses to the laws. (Ben, beer.) Then are the Os elphe upia whisk the grant Me hem testissed. The nabs awirmis mid he scull easily sologolun that tr .: tees is LOS, who opposed Me rout es , when doe law hed perned—be e=rid e as m eelf, rit t e l7 . lo rag te my, " and when its virtues had bees OM "—Oreglasr said he scald andentead that pis ems oho Me 'Wesel gnat might ems' sow is ibeeteltlsmose at the law; aad is nth a memo of pis maks there wield be se lammiliaasy. I emirs that the sworn of that prepolidia is small, true 1 oodmoray pones who supported the eiggied mast M tho loge sad grapestaties that it weed modest he ether huh Ma it has penseed, are alike guilty et as imiermistesey if they Nimbi have altered their opiates with mord to Me of the mat from the expeelegos of Me pest. a bear.) The noble marquis bee men liiiar• ea le than I have, and he is able to read and seedy sews of speeches which I am set able to Lor m-sr mast beg to disclaim. e. the pen of my magma of her Majesty's gmensest. bit here mad* responsible for any rte any speech tepee any hustings, end MOM ri d i r ili t= smile responsible for the comments whisk the marquis may think fit to pet on such supposed apenhes. My lord. (continued the noble earl), I mane with the noble marquis, that it is not by the speech stony individual is any place, it is not by the declaration of any individual Member of the ' , merriment on the hustings, that the course elf ei t i lirsthenent has to be decided. If there bo any change a i ntended by her Majesty'. government, I agree the sent sie that it is here anti in the other ° home el that that change of policy should be My Ards, I slit meat that Mr Majesty's go- VIE EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY.. EVENING, APRIL 21, 1852. a Se Wan to Mr. Boon% re in 1860 the oirount = * wide the 'of by St. real sad lia. hi ilt O p m a i l swab uni lh re been H a Me = Wile r as a a s al St f li a thlbo l ltf is ho: " I wide to yes Whip that dues =l e t bee bees nessoney Z a t e hj stile emenwillaws dot we dunk ant reddens In guerded Spilt tiell dm wil het we are at pessitsder the *llea lopeellem Orlin oeselebies, r_e ore weak leg the sereebnlibose essedea bet iief should aeles. I whb to lehos sew i~het es Belida!, Esiv. 17, • 2elsob of wet Innil as& aserasew penes regather wend due el sees 4 the derside. sod with a senekgmens des of videos' due the pnaselig desday t ant • tans of 100 onnlable mu to keep the sib his evert acts defoliants ; ant the eseidess et the paw ask We iss nes end • beds of the deters Shea Me ewe* t SS the ebb sods sembled to the owideg es she. al eels edit*. eal see gall WS Of tame aim sib. Mbar miss bellwleg et the hen of the Suede eel illeleoldeg the whets eisgroptha ; hat Seller sore essesed sets on thuries the Bak Iftesaber." lent win a denenedsm by lir. ftreisk of limit Ile mimed vet ewe of thine doles wee lobs Ste sally. He was Shea beheekli• lesalibles the seshisek who, in olds IsibillilliNgee side '' The Queues penis must bo pee wesio ad I is delinsbed to saws his this dls- Ida I bat ass piesses has sash Is seswer ' for, mod ea a sedges =llloltl who prevail ba w ls of the the hedignetisn of their Mew- selZe a ir the eigessise of the llamas be ilea a See se the passe, end sides he ef hose wile hdi the renew of the dashed Now , it was ne i ti zia lleines sethelin who SW thh palls i b i er ir e ar =ken ef, Set soy emiests the Sad ...... r wee wiled the eggradee, ef the hams esdnile shwa Illisitip7467l6l. Theme elesembsew heed thew Elm crat 66 bras of St phIS heti ea abbe of the CoehmeeNtez=egeso Nee sate of Solidest! wnspondesse twos Iles bias, NA Mr. silent, whisk Li t tbsrb49 Togs* Mr. Baum* to neap his Using, • seqnset Mr. Massa Me a threat. Tbs semis en wish& Sr woe oesetewei sob Ids resod wan set firth is IN =la ells be bid :--.. I bas sere thee ease sa le you vay her that yes were midis or es 1= is the aseebess ef would a bole he theenesse ISt& iris de a ls seek tee Wlb hist selliesda be the dish of Pass- net Ws tzte=seseLt s saw balers Ilse see be se has omswel of sense Mimi la we tionfolia by the mid ionesesises emit le s ands eases phs• may well be qpiallearL" Te thb War M. Henson esHi soneleuell the Is Mb Spas SS ease semieskathas hes the bibs, ble ea Wends le bin SS he bed Wee gals* beige likissalmair. owl OOHS Ali ire eilliait ewes wadi be ?diploid cre Sag ill• Bo net in . lb se* soli : • I dread he ands et any le- PI wreaks. of eodedeetleal pros AMink it ay bonds &sty Is monks all that I• nessitrstber is glass per being ender the selisa et espedfsg Were seek sues he that tibia. your ripiaisa, la ersest&_ I wadi, thee, ft to yearlerdship in this way. I would say, .if your indite tasiali be of continued op isiem treeing and knowing if all ilea:o, I ma giiiktfaudalthfulnente the Mw ml_l elk ; m g Myer Ming will after 11•11M11112 par u bidup thet h sold bc foe therm yid& Mof that th the dwell shish r your episode pa & s charge._ of 111 I dessill se Wipe lons is she Oleg of BR. Peers, I wall' this the esey nest doh_ sad pea a fors* beiguilia? The penis ea vital lb. liserett Wished le send le lie rya apposes& le him to be cay psi That resigestioa wss eser isi b l y i the Nishauf sabse is a teeter btu a keg of this M. sad es follows :—. your letter to Lad Reseal you declare that yes Is unties and ids was at the timed the sunewillse of fit. Bersabas, ' b wessesales and dna. It be now, phase God, for ever the same It is as unavoidableinference hes that the novelties of which I gemigkkeils gala I called up= you to lay aside, willraet be give up, al though I have forbidden them as being antrary to the church's order and intention. This leaves so no choice as to the cokes to be pursued. It is impasifie for mis not to think that ' the peace and good oder et the *rah which is under my episcopal charge' we be saleudy interrupted, and occasion of triumph given*. the shad's enemies, if you were to continue in your mew pat de liberately and avowedly disobey;ng the adeses of your bebop, and setting up your ow* prat M lie china's intention in opposition to his. It with area pads, but with no hesitation as to the nerekilty Whiek blob we to this conclusion, that I now signify my ►se milenig of_ your renewed ffer to mien the ineambeney MAIM TOM, and with it the Sept of St. Sambas." Ups that letter, Mr. BIM* seat in his Twig. swim fien of L andon see him, " Yon have lb eleursh as yo have been ;o&it h he the peas lied order of the mitateastruiste=ttturillioner And on that, amiss. Now Mr. ;Sand i rell6 twas . sweet that lobed led eireiggis le , and it was ll,L i til beim& thatbe bed es Omni mean than one. ( ea of Oust) Well, he was 1•11% may ihosima aSD day. (Hear, hear.) It yes OM would' sc: sms le lia * v a se , What, t MS the cri L s. vass, kWh, after NM Will retignation by the fillitiker 'Runge from' =11141, 111 nz ills , bear.) The news we first N ubs' , and it wee las a seller of ear- C o 101 l so= an th d e church d ws pi should setter d s:s t 4Saw. , la of the dash of lidbad should widest suaiesties. Moe, Ser.) It le emembered that Mr. Ism" la he souse of re am year Is whisk be bad Ish IS. Ilumeles demi Set file opals, was weekengoi end undsesehle. Md. auk any eivresvor bin review Os Mina uppees. I? ft bee appeal that the Sid* et and ells, et any se mho lei pow amid bin. led Nast knewbEgs of ems as. he Ids opinions The time nes sheet he sea a Is* Id senda—but awing het thee Ira bed /11= ass bun asloyed t Whet alma ha he banged Ms whet kith bad be proferekond with whet songeogelbs bed be jets* he worship ? Theme was e =see of elide the hose would regale a winded. , beer.) He (11r. Hens* herd the ateendes dee bees to the fish be wee about to state, be be meld roue his they bore dowdy on the 4 lb bed before shad that Mr Ilassett's aapssses to Prewelead created soh dis seemed bud dhowrise. • great deal wee maid it Is the Fes eel woad Shoe *lap a lads sp =in the public Jewish le Weide bh attends had shed is Jemmy bet. Adenalumm molar* In Ire- 1 hod wrote to the odder of the eedafrifireli es hikers : " Doer fib,—A few days ago I set sa Heade gentiontan it Hide, usety Galway, and he told we Set during the bell frekkee ha spent several weeks at Ileeksgen, in Ba wdy hr the bomb of his health. Is the ems hotel with bin woe the Res.inewelts kb nt St. Paul's, the whole period of his residence She Owe . _l=l seer see attoaded the Zeglish eini" kne negedegig vest le maw, owl his beeparable =Pwas s Osumi& him How ems II het seek s a bedibled le a bobs le the shush of Island ? —Tens Miiliklike Oltell d.—Achill, Jan. ims O'N. Plum 2, 1852. Curate of Obehre Chins% Melderiel 1" hew An Seem- 'wee. it was true, somewhat of the 31abetbshes be MI ghee it credence, he had him gna to the demos.. requesting to know from Wink hit had wished lie lallermatio t i l l. He reoeild th a Zrw ili gegbe s c e lt his authority, ee which i ten red ot e ir: be a e gained Whig in the neighourhood of London, a man r=ehlea, of the highest thunder, and of annua l... By. A communication was made to that ipmansu i smilag whether the statement made by Mr. Toed on lib authority was correct, and whether be was wHig la verify it himself. He would now read the gentle man% gnawer, without mentioning his name, as the letter Willa wet intended for publication, but the name and address wombs* at the service of any hen. member who might wilt Willow them. He had the permission, if nemesia, • meanest the name of the writer , who was the principle, a eseeleary near London. The following were his were: "As laglish clergyman, whose name in the hotel leek was Bennett, wearing the peculiarly longitudinal veltillkit nt lasted by the Puwyite clergy, and travelling in madney with Sir John Barrington, churchwarden of St. lbekkhesi, lodged for three weeks at the Hotel de Rosie Itiselagen, on the same finer with my rooms. My attendee was , called to him in the first instance by hearing the Germs I waiters, Mc., talking about him, his conduct with *id MI oc,ct i.llhisnever eslipi greu f ly.iir r eo,: i . ehetnd morning . the. elbfcri general stet: his betweenahic a l nie.c l nh c ieit o tuheeng:b :et.. the it that o tnehotg and u attract hhi he aetcan.: end: Roman lanmt , inquiry e catholic testify whidasnietghe asofaur issec service. e Jesuit t o odw his , one whnnt church,ietn that th e ir object was to attend mass, I presume there is no reason to doubt the filet. If there be, any ewe at Kissingen can attest it. During the same period wither ho nor any of his party were to be seen on Sunday. k the English chapel. It is a single room, capable of balding, perhaps, 100 persons, and had he been there he Mkt have been at once visible. But as I Where they eskelmel frensiderably longer at Kissingen than myself, the English chaplain seems to me the this who could give the moat convincing testimony on this point. I like wise beard him inquiring about a urinal, and saw a Ommehin, or some such monk, going in and out of his resift But I cannot with truth asseverate that within my barerledge he us. his inseparable companion. My rooms were, unluckily. next to Sir John Harrington's ; unluckily, es I was very ill, and Sir John constantly talked in so loud • wise dist surly all his talk we. forced upon me, the per• deem belersee German rooms being, ma you probably know, duke watriloqual ; 1 was therefore compelled to hear beg details about Roman catholic matters exclueively, In win. h Mr Bennett was constantly implicated. The whole effect was to leave no doubt on my mind whatever that Mr. Bennett was a thorough Romanist, end I eon. sidrred it so settled that I was never so astonished as at perceiving in the papers his appointment to Frame." Now, u this gentleman had appealed to the protestant chaplain at libelages for cailinostles el his statement, he (Mr. llosomas) be: s e it only fair to the house te crime den on reared gentleman's testimony the sastest. urines to him, stating Melt wee ldsieleatipa fe gog _MVO Witter before wha ms*. The pestles be le the chaplain at His singes wee darplyetbellow Mce . Mr. Bennett daring his slay at that pies Wen 4WD 414 his congregation. Here woo hie mower : "Sandwich, Are 14, 1862. " Sir,--I beg to acknowlego the receipt of your letter of the 10th inst., sad Is reply to your question respecting the prwast mar of FMB. add WO 4411.1111441 at pubile tram skip dazing last magma M Mielopm I ma ealy say that 1 believe he did mete owp dos ems me of m es e r nm eLeppw tion.—l have the bowie eeme*k _sif t your oem vest,?. La Oats Wpm, chaplain at pm—Mr. E. lisemme, Well, thee, It big Mall that Mr. Bennett atteadedmem during the sawmar be amtelaed at Kinds... sad it beings aeleiewe fled be bell net atemdell the pro Imam shwa. Om be tlimpla It wield be hell be be sub limate' hi • esniluire meaner that during Ms neidence al nags* hit =mit Kr. "A Via outwardly WI host a meArraer Pm worship ...4 r( ii " ; lam eaMinlin iamb, sal that he exhibited no 44WIDAMila Of sympathy with peelesteat church in alga be had is aseatly hem a Mas Seed minister. (Meer, bear.) Here, them was she Merry of Mr. Bonnet derive Pe 'year 1861. la ie. suss rigtat at kg N. issisislissay at the mum of his be law deeldoso maddifel te his ehsrcb , and WM, the muse et peed order In that church respired his magnetism In the summer of that pm be resided on the Cleuthmt, and was aseastant samba Mae !Zeman eagle& Maps!, and fa the autism albs some per he named to Eng land. And with ell these smisewleats be was accepted by a preimewat bids, Mbe the protestant pastor of the pro. Mesabi/lineal& These latter were thrown into an agony of wit s and ruled to the Marchioness of Bath, implor ing hue net to .wide their souls to the keeping of such a paws. They received the answer which might have been expected. Be (Mr. Hinman) had no complaint against either the l.gelity or the motives of Lady Bath's act. But the presentee to a living must be accepted by the bishop, and here was the only security to the public sad the church against aesaults from without and treachery from within. The parishioners memorialised the bishop of Bath and Wells, and, laying before him pmeges from Mr. Bennett's writings relating to the iWant religion and to the Bible, the condemnation of his eenduct by the Bishop of London, and Mr. Bennett's own letters, prayed their diocesan to suspend his sanction to the appointment. Mr. Human (who at some length com mented upon the protests and letters published at the time in our columns, and which he rend) contended that 'the bishop's duties were clearly defined by the canons, whereby it was sided " that no bishop should instit ute any to a besides who had been ordained by any other bishop, ex- We int show his letters of orders, and bring him a suf testimony of his former good life and opinion, if the hishoprequire it, and lastly shall appear,on due examination, to be worthy of his ministry." The usual " testimony" was a certificate signed by three beneficed clergymen ; and this, he was astonished to hear, had been obtained. But, if these clergymen did not reside in the diocese of the presentee, the bishop of the former must sign it, and this hod also actually been obtained, but with an unusual quali fication—the bishop expressly mentioning that he was merely entwine' the signatures of the three clergymen. This entailed& fresh duty of circumspection on the Bishop of Bath and Wells, who had, however, deliberately dis pensed with precautions enacted by law for the security of the church. But the bishop had another duty to perform, by the 48th canon, namely that of examination of Mr. Bennett, and for this the parishioners of Fromm also peti tioned. The bishop replied that if he had not been satis fied that Mr. Bennett had a firm attachment to our church he should not have instituted him. The pa rishioners made another application for delay, and received • mere acknowledgment. Mr. Bennett was, therefore, in stituted into a post of influence, patronage, and profit, and his first act was to dismiss the popular curate whom he found established at Franc, and put in his place one of the curates who resigned at the same time with him self. Frame had been agitated, and even the dissen ters there had held meetings on the subjert—(signifi. cant cheers and counter cheers, which elicited from Mr. Human a eulogium on dissenters)—and nu merous respectable families had withdrew° from the church. Dwelling upon the dangers to he apprehended from those who hold such tenets as Mr. Bennett's, ho declared that there was no hope of ecclesiastical assistance, and that it became the duty of the laity (who were the church) to lay their case at the foot of the throne, and to implore the Queen to force the dignitaries of the church into obedience to tie laws. lie concluded by moving an address to her Majesty, praying inquiry whether due respect was paid to the constitutions and canons ecclesiastical of the Church of England in the recent institution of Mr. Bennett to the vicarage of Frome. (Cheers.) The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he did not think it possible to exaggerate the importance of the question, and when ho thought of the elms of topics that debate would give rise to, if the house sanctioned the mo th" he looked on it as a parliamentary duty to consider it gems rife with elements of discussion calculated to pro ems an effect on opinion out of doors which had pro- bably not been anticipated. lie did not rise te glue ea opinion on the question the bon. gentleman) beb bib bebilse Bile house. Ile felt, and he never felt fete neatt ru lt bauneenience of a popular assembly's eateig on a dem We this. (Neer, bear.) It. had beam much streak Mile be listened to the address of the ha gentleman, with tin hodequacy of his proposition te dud Ida the circuit dames to which he had called attendee. and which, W 3. see to his statement, involved • great pier &mem It was a subject which involved matters peculiarly caudated to interest the feelings of many of her Majesty's salgeeM in a manner the most acute. But he did not stn. derstand the hon. gentleman to have proposed any remedy for the alleged grievance. The proposition was ' That as humble address be presented to her Majesty, praying dud she will be graciously pleased to direct inquiry to be min whether due respect was paid to the decrees of the NEW. talons and canons ecclesiastical of the church of E= e. a the recent institution of Mr. Bennett to the vicarage Now, he thought that the house, before it aasealed le MIA I an address, would do well to consider whether, by agreeing to it, they established an authority which was able to cope with the circumstances to which it referred. Suppose the house assented to the motion, and her Majesty directed a commission of inquiry, which was what the hon. gentleman meant, no authority would accompany that commission of inquiry which could force any one to make communica tions he might be unwilling to offer; and there would be no power to obtain from individuals probably the very infor mation it was the object of the inquisition to obtain. It ap peared to him that on the statement of the hon. gentleman one of two alternatives must occur : Either there was at present a remedy for such a grievance, or there was not. Ile (Mr. Disraeli) spoke on the subject with that deference 'Lich became any member who was not possessed of the particular learning which applied to the question, but ks had always understood, and he believed it to be so, that the wu an appeal from any prelate to the archbishop. If that was so,—if the conduct or the decision of any prelate was subject to that revision, is that case the House of Com mas ought not to interfere before such an appeal had been made_, and while such a tribunal existed, they would not esamliteM for it other means so inadequate to obtain the readtiedred. He might be told (and he should be sur prised if he was) that no such appeal existed. If so, was it ant a came der ation by parliament if there was no remedy fora evance of so enormous a character as that stated ? Par ' ent, indeed, might institute inquiry, and might obtain information such as the hon. gentleman re , gutted, and acquire such a knowledge of details as would lay the foundation of sound and necessary legislation. It might be the opinion of some gentlemen that there was too greet a facility for the institution of clergymen into livings. He gave no opinion on that subject, but he could easily un derstand that such &belief existed, and that it was also believed that it was a proper subject for legislation, and that there should be an increased control in • matter of such interest to so many persons. But in what way would it be met by the proposition of the hon. gentleman ? He thought that the hon. gentleman was justified. in bringing 1 forward the subject, and, if he thought that there was no remedy for the grievance from which the inhabitants of ' Fresno woes suffering, it would be a legitimate and justi fiable mom it the him. gentleman were to endeavour to meet itry legidatios. But, if the remedy was en appeal to the taflibralmor as superior prelate, ho thought that the hon. would agree with him that such an appeal should C a made llefore the house could agree to his resolution. If, however, the hon. gentleman thought there was no such pewee a appeal, be must feel that his proposition was in adequate is his object, and that he ought to call on the Muse se to *Paste as to meet the question. Those being the Tins, ha (Mr. Disraeli) entertained, ho had only edemas& himself to the motion without giving any opinlea on the merits of this important case. Far be it from him to vindicate any clergy men who it could be shown had conducted himself in such a manner as it had been alleged that Mr. Bennett had; I but he felt that that house was not the tribunal to decide 1 a ease like the present. lie felt the inconvenience while 1 listening to the statement of the hon. gentleman, which ho had so conscientiously brought forward, of the house having 1 to decide on • statement made in an aasembly like that. All he wished to impress on the house was, his anxiety that it should not adopt a resolution inefficient for the purpose the 1 hon. gentleman desired, and which would he inconvenient ' if adopted : II commission of inquiry which set about to I inquire without power to elicit information, would be a mockery to which it would be unwise for the house to have 1 recourse. If a commission was to issue for extraordinary purposes, and under extraordinary circumstances, they should take care that the inquiry was real and efficient, and accompanied by . powers which would secure the means of eliciting the truth. He hoped the honourable gentleman would not feel it his duty to press the resolution. Ile hail brought before the house—and ho was justified in doing so—a matter of grave importance to all classes of her Majesty's subjects. It was impossible for such conduct, as that which the hon. gentleman had alleged to have taken place, to pass without being made the subject of public comment ; and, whatever Inight be the merits of the ease, public iliarussion upon it utast no doubt end in advantage to the public. Ile (Mr. Vhraeli) must repeat what he had already said—that when there was a gricv ince, it was necessary to ascertain whether there was a remedy for it or not ; and if, as he believed, there was in this case a remedy by an appeal to the Arch bishop, the house ought not to sanction a commission whi li would have no power to elicit information. It, on the other hand, there was no remedy, it was the duty of parliament to legislate on the subject, and to secure that this and any other grievance should have • remedy Implied to it by law. In either alternative be felt that the house would not pursue a course calculated to meet the difficulty of the case, or becoming to Itself, if it agreed to a commodes of inquiry, which would go forth to Its task withent poseur to elicit information, and would therefore dbeggoiat public ezpectation, and lead to a pro tracted discussion without obtaining the result desired. They would only evade the difficulty by acceding to a motion like that of the hon. gentleman, and they would be establishing a precedent which would be found ere long pregnant with difficulty and embarrassment. Ile could not understand, if the house adopted this resolution, how a single clergyman could be inducted into a liviog without the house, if it chose, interfering, and giving an opinion on the propriety of his induction. By issuing a commission to inquire into,the institutioa et ma individual into a living they would , furnish a precedent for a meet mischievous kind of inter- ' femme, and one which would not act beneficially for the saMismwat of dm difficulty. Ho trusted that the hon. gem llemen—eatielled with having brought so ably, so amply, and eampletely before the house a subject the importance of whisk would not be exaggerated, satisfied with having laid the eriudoct et the room connected with this transaction bears the owaWy, sod thinking that perhaps correct views of the *orameMoess of the case might be the consequence of the dieiressism and feeling it to be his duty . from the pities he has taken with t was toisiewa Misr tie knee %Morse t 4 inch remedy for the pines% Ai& the law supplied, or if it supplied acne, himself% prows redraw by new le gislation—would not pre., to•dividesta readution pregnant with embarrassment and inconvenience le the future deli berations of the house. (Cheese.) The right hon. gentle man concluded by moving the revises question. Sir H. VERNEY hoped that his hon. friend would not follow the advice of the right boa. gentleman. The subject must bo ono of great eu.barraemeest when the right hon. gentleman, possesoed as he was of great power of language, ' wan evidently from the beginning to the end of his address eta lees for means to answer the speech of his hon. friend. (Hear, bear.) The right hon. gentleman was so used to at tack that he was unable to defend the conduct of a portion of the established church to which they all belonged—(no, no )—and which they were so anxious to defend. Sir ft. INOLIS entirely agreed with the right. hon. gentleman the Chancellor of the Exchequer that the House of Commons was not the tribunal for an appeal on such a question as this. (Hear, hear.) The right how. gentleman had mods it unanswerably clear that it they assented to this motion. they would be establishing a precedent which would lead to end less inconvenience, in constituting the House of Commons the arbiter in every case of an analogous nature to that which had been introduced to their notice by the hon. mem ber for Cockermouth. (Hear, bear.) Every disputed in duction would necessarily lead to an appeal to the house and to a commission. (Hear, hear.) He would grant, if they liked, that in this instance a prima facie case for inquiry had been made out; but, conceding this, he would defy the hon. member for Cockermouth, or any other hon. gentle man, to contest the truth of the suggestion of the right hon. gentleman (Mr. Disraeli), viz., first that the House of Commons could not stop here, if it agreed to begin here, and, secondly, that an assent to the motion would, after all, be but a brtatais 'ahem. (Hear, hear.) He would vote with the right boa. gentleman the Chan cellor of the Exchequer. Mr. EWART could not at all agree with the hon. baronet in the view he took of the function of the house on this occasion. The house was in no way called upon to consti tute itself a tribunal for deciding upon the merits of the question in dispute. The house was simply applied to for the purpose of inducing those to act and decide who had the power to act, and whew prerogative it was to decide. Mr. HUME never wished to hear a theological discus sion in that house, but the house had sanctioned a church, established it by law, and laid down rules for its guidance. Public property had been applied in support of the church, a church scandal had occurred, and there never was a mere legitimate subject for inquiry. Mr. NEWDECIATE said that the mere passing by this gam wihout devising means to remedy the evil would not satisfy the public. Ho was willing to leave the matter in the hands of the government, but be hoped that the house would not be asked to ignore the question. It had been estasd, and must be dealt with. Sir J. I'AKINOTON said the hon. gentleman who has Just spoken has made use of a very decisive expression. He said this question has been raised and must be dealt with. Now, no hon. member of this house can more cordially con cur in the view implied in that expression than I do. I will say further, that this question now raised is a question which ought to be raised. (Cheers.) I say, indeed, for myself, and, I believe, I may say for every member of her Majesty's government, that as this question is one which ought to have been raised, so it demands an investigation, and that a remedy ought to bo ptovided. (Cheers.) But at the sumo time, speaking not only as a member of her Majesty's government, but, above all, as a sincere and attached member of the Church of England, and speaking nay earnest convictions, that having listened with painful attention to the speech of the hon. member for Cock ermouth, I do not think that the plan which he has proposed is the precise mode of in quiry which could be adopted with the most effect. I will express my reasons for entertaining that opinion, and will direct the attention of the hon. member for Cocker month to the fact that this resolution goes only to call in question the conduct of the Bishop of Bath and Wells in having instituted Mr. Bennett at Frame ; and, in fact, I don't use the word offensively—this is only an attack upon that prelate. Now, the hon. member cannot fail to remem ber that the Bishop of Bath and Wells is not only very ad vanced in years, but that he is greatly impaired in health. (Cries of " Oh, oh.") lam not prepared to vindicate the conduct of that prelate but I must say that the acts of the Bishop of Bath and Wells are very far from constituting the whole question now raised. (Hear, hear.) The ques tion which the hon. member for Cockermouth has raised is, in reality, not the conduct of the bishop in instituting Me. Bennett to the living of Frame without previous inquiry, bet it is the conduct of Mr. Bennett while at Kissingen. It is that oonduct at Kisrengen which ought, I think, to be made the subject of inquiry. If the representations made by the hon. member be correct, and those representations are no doubt supported upon evidence of the most respect able character, it does appear to me that Mr. Bennett must be regarded as being a Roman catholic, and as there to= being incapable of holding the office which he now holds in the church of England. (Cheers.) But what ever that conduct may have been—end I have no inclina tion to prejudice it—we have, 6o far, no reason to suppose that it was known to the Bishop of Bath end Wells, at the time Mr. Bennett was inducted by him at Frame. On the contrary, I believe that if the facts were investigated, it would be found that the induction of Mr. Bennett at Frome was the direct means of bringing to light the circumstances which occurred 'at Kissers en. This motion does not at all touch that conduct ; and, looking to the extreme danger and inoonvenience of bringing those wee before the House of Commons, I do think that it would be most inadvisable, even setting aside the facts in connexion with Kissengen, to make the institution of Mr. Bennett at Frome the subject if a motion in this house. It certainly would seem that the boo. member for Cockermouth would have appealed to the house Hartford to that institution, had it not been fur the subsequent statement in respect to Kissengcn. I must advert to one part of what the hon. gentleman said. He referred to the fact that the Bishop of London had sent let ters dimissory to Mr. Bennett. I ant not at liberty to make any authoritative statement in regard to that matter, but it does happen that I know that the language used by the Bishop"of London on that occasion was such, that were it in timated, I am satisfied that the hon. member for Cockermouth would not feel the elighteat disposition to complain of the conduct of the Bishop of London. Looking, then, to the inconvenience of making such questions the subject of parliamentary inquiry—looking, also, to the shape in which the hon. member for Cockermouth has presented his motion, applying as it does to the conduct of the Bishop of Bath and Wells in instituting Mr. Bennett under circum stances, so far as he was acquainted with them, very differ ent from those which are now alleged to have been the ease— -1 do feel that the right course for the house to tako is to agree to the previous question. At the same time, I must empha tically express the hope that what has passed on this occa sion will be the direct means of causing an inquiry particularly in respect to the statements of the behaviour of Mr. Bennett at Kissingen. (Cheers.) Lord JOHN RUSSELL—I trust that the statement which has just been made by the right hon. gentleman will have the effect of relieving, if not the whole house, yet many members of the house, from very considerable em barrassment. (Cheers.) I think it is impossible to deny that this is a subject upon which the house has a right to an explanation. (Cheers.) I did not at all agree with my hon. friend the member for the University of Oxford (Sir It. Inglis), when, as it appeared to me, he would exclude this house from a right to an inquiry with respect to mat ters of this nature. This house was a party to passing the Act of Uniformity, and I believe that Act of Uniformity was passed at a period when protestant dissenters were mem bers of this house ; and. indeed, I am not sure that Roman catholica might not have had seats in the house at that time. But that Act of Uniformity being an act of parliament, this house has a right to ask whether clergymen appointed to benefices are persons who are faithful members of the church of England, or whether they do not belong, in fact, to some other Christian community. (Hear, hear.) Still, however, having thus, as I conceive, established the right, I own that I feel the greatest difficulty in proceeding to eser cies it. (Hear, hear.) • I feel the greatest difficulty both as to the mode in which it maybe exercised, and as to the con sequences to what that exercise may lead. (hear, hear.) I cannot but feel that if a commission were appointed which had not, in fact, greater powers than are now allowed to the crown, and which could not be obtained without an act of parliament, the only result might be the provoca tion of hostilities from persons who would refuse to answer your questions, and thus create dissensions between this branch of tho legislature and part [of the church of lii.gland. (Rear, hear) I cannot but feel also that it would he most unfortunate if, after this house had interfered, the remedy you yourselves relied on should prove to be insufficient. (Rear, hear.) 1 feel like wise with regard to this particular case the want of that advice which we had in former times from members of this house qualified to give their opinions. I miss a right hon. friend of mine—a member of this house—and another hon. gentleman, at present I believe a member of this house, but who is now absent—who might have informed us on those points on which the right lion. gentleman the Chancellor Of the Exchequer has expressed an hesitation—vie., how far there may bo an appeal of the inhabitants of Frame from the Bishop of Bath and Wells to the Arch bishop of Canterbury, and how far the existing law is capable of dealing with matters of this description. I feel, moreover, with regard to this particular case, that we are at present in a great degree uninformed. With regard to the subject mentioned last by the right hon. gentleman the Secretary for the Colonies, as to the terms in which the Bishop of London expressed his opinions, in the testimonial and letters dimissory to the Bishop of Bath and Wells, the house is entirely without any means of judging. Lastly, we are in ignorance of the amount of the information possessed by the Bishop of Bath and Wells in reference to the faith and recent venunent have no present Werra of tering to erring Mats of the law. If piss to abet *a views white dry have ekt =k laili Z_ A... is osesignamtly to an 'Remiss ia *dr course et ufll 27 be give togs s soils via ISTZ uo t i *Sdasos is th e n odule haws of of l tai then the nab sr ryas Iv Imp an 'lst Wag sash steps se Its my nosslyPyr flaw .. a n t Ilik. pan of opposiag ths tifilesi ea 1 SIM IS sot at present in cantemplatles, et tee the ~ea. if be thinks it MOM Arial', of tonntleg sag indiy assothses of the government with a supgassi thoossigsnag loshrosn their present and their past sendast. (Buse, bawl Earl GREY said he add not esersin front obsery ing, that he thought his maim bled had a right to expect • MOTO distinall acierierie te his very i/11- portant question. (lieu, Um) Is (lastGll7)_ceatinall that the subject was ono which ought set to hs len is dliabt. and that the noble earl was harand ta rate whether his opinions upon it now were the sass that he had espossed inkSO. The Earl of DERBY confessed that he hod been greatly disappointed by the result of the 'measure et Ifidi In the course of the subsequent dismiss. the INlsrpia of Lansdowne stated that If it IMO 0: 1 = 01 to Mill the grant las should oppose say mei After • few words Oros the Maim of Cams. and East 0 air, in explanation. The subject dropped, and the hoses adjourned at a quarter to 7 o'clock. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—TOESDAT, APRIL 20. The Seams's took the chair at a arter kw AWL ROYAL ASSEN T. Sir A. Canton°, the Usher of the BRA Rod, wowed the keen to attaud in the House of Peen to witness the giving of the royal assent by ocannedon to the Mutiny and other bills. NEW WRIT. On the motion of Mr. F. Maeseexte a new writ Ives ee-1 tined fee the election of a member for the city d Wan► ter, in the room of Francis Milford, Mt, who lint MOS the Chiltern 'Neared.. PRIVATE BUSINSMIt Ritait:lo.,--Ahapikes lb. ju, A m nia i • ; Dead beeelsee mei Ram, Mos =woe ' 16;le; Amigmellts ,liaaratrey eel Oda ime Reim, kabaissir wig llerleldllai Railway; Ras. Betio sillellehdp as MIMI, AND AOlllO TO. .her limbele sod Cremes Oath aid Bawls Pa& vow ,• Thendellt and &MIAMI. Railway ; Rasters ens firßailway (lssel to the Rim Sews, Re.; Rasters dentin Rail (Junction with the Rest and West India • &c , ) ; llikauweek, sod Ardromn Rail- way ; Revenant ; limmethhe Central Rail way ; South WOW Railway ; Media Fen District Mala n" ; York, Nemetle, sad Berwick, and Melees soul Urania tussles Railways ; Teak. Newcastle, souI INF with Railway Mink and Mates Branch); Bills PUBLIC BUSINESS. PETITIONS PRESENTED. XAttranat ENDOWMENT Acr.—By Mr. W. PATTER, Rom Fomtn ,• Mr. SPOONER, from places in War. vlskates; Mr. CHItISTOPHER, from Lincolnshire; Mr. EWART, from Mishit* and other places; Mr. lIEWDEOATE, from Warwickshire; Mr. PACKS, hen 16,457 persons residing in the county of Linnet 011 DUFF, from Keith, and a number of other places shire ; Mr. S. WADDINGTON, front Illolleigh,lfaujilo ton, Ditsdon, and many other places in Suffolk •, by Laid DRUMLANRIG, from I'resbyterians of Dumfries, Annan, mid Sher places in Dumfriesshire ; for repeal of. Marna Mt-L.—By Mr. HINDLEY, from Newport; ' Kr. H. BERKELEY, from Bristol; Mr. 11. FOLEY, I Gam Worcester ; Mr. J. ELLIS, from Leicester • Mr. BRIGHT, from working men in Manchester, f rom the Islamised' of Carnanon, from a public town's meeting at Deldigmseth, from the inhabitants of Whitehaven ' and from St. David's, Pembrokeshire ; Mr. MOWATT, from Peerhys ; Lord 1). STUART, from Marylebone ; against. Taxes on Knowazoos.—By Col. THOMPSON, from operative printers of Bradford • Mr. W. J. FOX, from Oldham, Finsbury, and other places; for repeal of. CRYSTAL Pat.acs.—By Mr. MULLINGS, front Ciren cester; Mr. W. WILLIAMS, from Lambeth; Mr. FAR RER, from Stockton; Mr. O. SANDARS, from Wake. field ; for retention of. Taxes on Aouleccrcue.—By Col. GILPIN, from the guardians of Luton Union, in counties of Bedford and *Word, complaining of the unjust severity of keel bur. Slew upon agricultural interests, and praying ler more equal assessment upon property generally. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER reek yew mot to sides, that on Thursday, 25th Mt., tad es ere aawaliss Thweedey during Use swim mien of the day SWIM lime maims* et modes etsielima After a beW earrersatiss. sill k siallissen et na tions flied for that day, notions a>tmei r 'Ass day, 6th of May k awl smells Mr. SLANEY pie 'elmratmeSet Amy fsbight he should move fora seasthe semlllse sr emmission, to prepare suggestions beneficial to the waking donee. Mr. SPOONER gave notice that he Assn e his motion for the repeal of the grant to , from Thursday next till the 4th May. Mr. BRIGHT said he did not know whether be wu et liberty to do so, but be would ask the hon. gentleman. hewhether readintended to bring forward this motion or not. This was the second or third time that he had post poned it, and considering the use made of the motion— (Cries of " order.") The SPEAKER intimated that the bon. member must confine himself to putting the question. Mr. BRIGHT said, thee, he would ask the hon. gentle man if he would Si a day, and stand to It. Mr. SPOONER replied that he would fir • day, and stand to it. The reason why he had postponed it was, ho cause the ballot had put him in a position on the paper, that it was impossible for him to being it on. Mr. STAFFORD intimated, in reply to Mr. M. litmeas, that instructions were about to be sent out to captain Aus tie, to direct one or two of the vessels under his command le all at the Solomon Islands on their way home, to aner• ink the Sits of Mr. Boyd ; and in answer to Sir R. Inglis, be used that orders had been given to exercise the men in sevy in lowering boats, for the purpose of faeilitatinr disembarkation in cases of accident at sea. OUTRAGE UPON A CORPORAL OF MARINE' IN LE, The CHANCELLOR at titiTikiVHEQUER, ea base iperieeed by Lord D. broads, relative to the ithlossessent d a lair sopetel of series artillery, Wig to there oa leer eR ripsobil the rust be pet co • pro visos overeft rat O. Tunes polies err who had com mitted thew -imp_ hell bra kosher ed ler eight days, but Wel that the Dahl reersaiset AN art look upon such impisesesent so a earbstry tersatiss. The case of Mr. barn still formed the subject of diplomatic correspond ing. REGULATION OF VESTRIES. Illa DZ L. EVANS moved for leave to briag in • bill to amend so set of the Ist and 2nd Wm. IV. let the awls. Ira of rain with reference to joint parrs. The slo. rat of eel, be said, waste obviate sow Meath, teak log ads corseting the puishee of St Nareposee set II John % re wry_ her cos of whisk vas aiselal by Or satsprie aid the Mor ism mitobille* Lear was *re es !swift fettle WI. THE BISHOP OF LORD= AND NIL SENNETT. Mr. HORSMAN then a", en 1M Milks of whim bed ryes netise—a That resew by the remitutions aim moms osibeleolismir doer of Neolael it is dossed awl ambled, that es raspshad Ysmreleany to • brio der miss boa been wired hy soy eihr meet te feet row eels Wm lb Wise of seites,_ owl blot a waled tolhosey of bh brow pest lb eel If do bleep ail morn it ; esd, bob, shell rpm, ea ems arerstier to to worthy of Wed elOrp. • (Goes St) Abe, that ea worm or slier sr ihell be paredltel M sire la gay Pin wirer merlselita end admire of the bishop Ili the dream. or ocamael Ms *me oar* rebilatior r lb heed air brief verse es the water of the elm sad metros the rety. And re oil wain sad eirlitose, II they se. nor hum ON Nair le mere; AA see be by ess sear sidled to mar whitest tentioeso of thereby Os dim" or ordiscey of the plass as Oneent, Trees boy awe, is writhe, of their honesty, ability, led see. ere* the ecclostioal laws of the demi of Issioed: y in be 48.) An that she heiabis mill bo rin be se be pr * oeseledi to Is Most boo Illa steEpra to made, whether Ass Eyre lrm a w h oa rid to As Broom of the constitagew nosh arms seilsiorel or the etsoseh or B ee ell resat inelithnsa *Mr. limaiett to the of Teesee. - The history d id* Demett, the in of k Pure and 81. Bar. maw owl who had been offeigoil geor of Frew, woe sommthat Wookem, Ile did set wish to enter late 111 a" then til aw r op re anxieties which bod bees lek to ibe resershoseis that bad bra stele to the . Mr. Dane was rirto re iacumbeney of St. Psi% le ist3, bat eo g riet mu know; Win that ham Me bed boa knows by his preaching end by his writings. sollboo bed bees se mesh embed by own parties end by 'WI., that when them wee a meow of his tip pointless& to the thwegebsesy d It. Par %, remortereas were digested and sisoisish abeam& to the lligep of Leers aria* it. At Ilse rest he rot bo youltril say that he made en strobe Armor, fiatb bed es esmelsint to orbs, god so chair to beim egrest Nl* Sesostt ce assort of thestereal sprier. Wharves of*it be the 41111111•111111110 M eilreierno of gay mss, be he lay sr essiselet w as s r a. se be robe se b., es tons se be related es le heo es be thilleted no in*, as assaty, his suligirms orreries wen, entitled to the env most of every era, and by him shed* always he reopeolcd. It was to Mr. bennett's sib as a aborma of the demi of England, as. instnreest snd ape* of the eim other Eng, md, and with the sets of bees mho were eat in authority, with the hider of the ehmeL et Wand, that be had to deal. Ile would read to the berm se extract hem a pamphlet written In 1813, by a *ethylene of a Lon don resereoce, who warned the Whop in the.. terms : "I have sot food, even in the OaileiTracta, abounding as they do M. awful arms, were Is the werof false doc trine more pernicious then to be heed in Mr. Bermett's published sermons." Total isprividan of his opinion the author added : " If Mr. Hama Wappointed to the church sow erecting In this isiliswhead I shall muskier it my duty t oe zpoile his Weeds ..othroagh this !medium of the press. - He quoted this ray le show that the Bishop of !notion was warned of tbeentherrosemonts that might be caused by these appointments. That warning was unhappily disregarded— unhappily, he thought, for Mr. Bennett—unhappily for the Bishop of Motion—unhappily for the parish to which he was appoiuted. The proceedings from 1843 to 1840 he .114 set c u m . to en t er upon a t length; but this, at least, they knew from the best authority, that during that period (ro piest sercestreeses sad essaphists were mar by du Fractious of Mr. Bennett at the time wh en he instituted that gentleman at Frame. True, the hon. me m . her for Cockermouth, who has brought forward the ques tion with so much ability, may say that all this is ouly a result for inquiry; and I admit that it is. But at the same time I own I do feel the greatest beeitation in pro ' ceeding to give a vote in favour of an address to the crown, thus beginning this inquiry on the part ot the Bowe of Commons. The right hon. gentleman, the Secretary fur the Colonies, thinks that the case is a proper euhject for inquiry, and that there ought to be so in quiry ; and I do feel, under the circumstances, that the better coursewould be that we should unit until the ministers of the crown have been enabled to e.certaiii more fully the exact facts—until they, with due authority, have put such questions es they may think fit to put, and asked such explanations u they may think lit to ask, I hope in the most friendly spirit, and not with a view to accusation or impeachment—when they having made their etatraiento the house, we should be better able to consider what we ought to do. (Hear, hear.) I cannot but think that it may linally be the duty of the ministers of the crown, not to propose new laws, but to provide for the more easy operation of the laws that are at present in existence ; for thtut who are most learned on these subjects have always informed me that there is the greatest difficulty with rtspect to reek points in akertainiog the extent of redress already pro vided by the law. On the whole, then, the sow ect being one of such transcendent importance, frought with con- sequences so serious, I should . certainly be inclined, for my own part, and 1 hope the house is inclined, to hesitate before giving a vote in favour of the motion, but rather to leave the case, as it now stands, to the ministers of the crown, to consider what steps they can take , Bed for them, at some future day, to declare whether the tints can be fully laid before us. Until that period sense- I, for one, cannot consent to be a party to an address to the crown. Mr. H. DRUNIMOND (who on rising was imt. by load cries of " Divide," to which he replied by pouting to the hour—half-past six—and remarking that "ins, r was net ready yet) desired to express his opinion that the !l owa o f Commons was the proper and legitimate triounal in assert ing,the rights of the laity against the usurpations of the priesthood. (Cheers.) Ile was not appiying this remark to any special case. Ile cared not what a nom coldest him self—whether a papist or a protestant. 11,. was ageing that man who said " the priesthood is the church." (Cheers.) Mr. SPOONER thought that the government hail not met the motion properly. The question inug settled; and the government would do well to take the lout thrown out by the noble lord (Lord J. Rumen), and to the house that au inquiry would be made. In that case. the motion might be withdrawn. Mr. MANGLES could not understand why the Home of Commons was not to be considered a legitimate tribunal for adjudication in a controversy like this. (Hear, hear.) This was not a party question, and the goreninient would not be discredited by the wiehdrawal of the motion for the previous question. (Divide, divide.) Mr. GLADSTONE said that it was not at that moment that Mr. ilorman's allegations were to Le diecu , seil, hat he (Mr. Gladstone) was prepared, from a partial knowledge of the case, to dispute at a proper time the accoracy of those allegations, and to show that Mr. Borman had actually misquoted his own documents. It. cave ( o n challenge) an instance of such misquotation. Objectiug to all vague proceedings, he expressed Lis opinion that Lord J. Russell's suggestion was a wise one. But he fully granted that a most serious question was raised against the Bishop of Bath and Wells. In reference to that case, inquiry into Mr. Bennett's conduct was most material, and he thought that government might well ins , itutc a friendly exatninatiou into the subject. lie hail himself, however, long believed our ecclesiastical law to be in All unsnisfac tory state, and it might be found necessary to take steps for ameliorating its action ; but in regard to the present in vestigation, he thought it advisable to leave it in the hands of government. Mr. Secretary WALPOLE, while admitting the incense. nience of such discussions, agreed with Mr. Gladstone that a case had been made out which invited and demanded in quiry. If the law were not strong enough to meet conduct like that alleged against Mr. Bennett, it ought to be made strong enough. Re remarked, however, upon the vague way in which Mr. 'foramen had left his notice on the paper for a fortnight, and that it was only on the preceding night that members kuew on what grounds it was to he brought on. Opportunity ought to be given fur proper inerstie.ition and answer to the charges. lie then promised that govern ment would accept the suggestion of Lord J. Itte , sell and Mr. Gladstone so far as related to the undertaking of a friendly inquiry into the question. Lord It. GROSVENOR recommended, that after tha undertaking just given by the Rome Secretary, the motion should be withdrawn, . . Mr. AGLIONBY recommended, on the contrary, that the resolution should be pressed to a division. Mr. IiORSMAN, in answer to Mr. Gladstone, thought that the proper time for refuting his statements was when they were advanced, and retorted upon upon him the charge of misquotation. Replying to several of the spenders, he said, iu conclusion , that he would accept a judicial, and not a friendly, inquiry, and would not withdraw his mo tion on other terms. Mr. GLADSTONE having briefly explained, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could not promise a judicial inquiry, not being cognisant of any means by which it could be conducted, but he would pledge himself that the inquiry should be bona_ fide. The house then divided, and the previous question was carried by— Ayes Noes FOREIGN REFUGEES. - _ Lord D. STUART moved for or extracts of any communications which have between the govern ment of this country and Ter ey, and other foreign go. Torments, respecting the Hungarian and other refagees ' detained at Kutayah, from the date of the last despatch on this subject, a copy of which has been laid before this house ap to the present time (in continuation of papers alresaly presented to parliament). It might be in the recollection of the house that very early in the year 1840—he believed la the first week of the session—he drew their attention to Ilse events which had then lately occurred in Hum* awl Turkey, and to the unjustifiable demands which bradi beganade by Austria and Russia for the surrender of Meal* refugees, who had been engaged in the struggle Hat ball token place for the liberty and independence of Hungary, and who had afterwards sought refuge in the territories of Turkey. A debate, which occupied a consi derable number of hours, and in which many hie aourable members took pert, ensued, and the result IMO that the noble lord the member for Tiverton ober stating his opinion upon these transactions, agreed to lay upon the table of the house a selection from the des patches which had passed between this and the different countries concerned. A very considerable time elapsed be fore those papers were forthcoming, and it was not infect till the year following, after he had reminded his noble friend of his promise, that it was fulfilled, and the cote° lord laid on the table two sets of despatches. The object of his motion, was that this correspondence, which only en tended to April, 1860, should be brought down to the libe ration of the refugees, that was, to the lit of S‘' •ptember, in last year, and should thus be completed. Ile really hail aoidesitha4any objection would have been felt by the govern. meat to this motion, which appeared to him a very simple one and one that he expected would have been granted as a matter of course, as an unopposed return. He brought forward the motion with a bona tide desire to obtain the papers be asked for, and certainly not an a 7pee on which to hang a speech or a debate. The noble lord (Lord Palmerston) had told him that a careful selection from the despatches would be of great advantage ; and the noble lord at the head of the late government said that if those papers were laid upon the table of the house they would prove that the British government had in reality done that which the American government cleimed to have done, namely, that it had been the author of the lilieratiou of the captives who had licenses unjustly detain, d at Kat tayah. (hear, hear.) lie (Lord D. Stuart) was quite ready to give the United States all the credit which their exertions deserved, but he believed that if it had not been for the energetic representations of the noble lord (Lord Palmerston) the Miseissippi world have been at the Dardanelles until now. (Hear, hear.) This would be established by the papers for which he Iris moving ; and if they were laid upon the table of the house the public would be able to form a just opinion upon the circumstances of the case. Some persons denied that the British government had had anything to do with the matter, and asserted that the liberation of Kossuth and his compa nions was an act of clemency on the part of the Austriaa and Turkish governments. Ihe public would le. able to judge whether this had been so, if they had the documents before them. The despotic governments trembled at the idea of the refugees being at large. ea they had endeavoured to intimidate the Sultan to continuo their unjust detention ; for much as he (Lard Dudley Stuart) applauded the conduct of the Sultan iu refusing to give them up, and in having alter" wards sot them at liberty, it was unjust to have ki pt than in prison at all. (Hear, hear.) The only reason why he bad detained them was to propitiate his powerful neigh bours; and be (Lord Dudley Steele) would tell the house what it was of which the despotic powers were afraid. They dreaded the free discussion upon their acts which would take place in this country. They did not like Kowuth or tiny other political refugee to come here because they knew that:their tyrannical laws and police regulations could fe" prevent the freest scrutiny of their acts. They wire of the light of truth, and they kuew that the pre, political refugees fn this country would cause the I of those who had driven them to exile to he fully eta and hence they endeavoured to prevent these nun, they had in the first instance driven to resistance, ft joying the hospitality which this free country had given, and always would give, to such persons. hear.) The correspondence was necessary to vindi Ie policy of the late Foreign SeCretary, and therefore be neither microns nor fair if the present govertim. tasted in withholding them. (Hear, hear.) 'lke lord concluded by moving for the correspondence. Mr. Henn briefly seconded the motion. Viscount PALMERSTON said that, as he W2l very 111.1C11 construed in the cortespondenee to wl noble friend had alluded, lie might be permitted to t earliest opportunity to state that, Ili far u he w cerned, and speaking as tar as he was at liberty ; the government of which lie hull been a member. sec no objection to granting the motion of his in 1.1. (Hear, hear.) It was a notorious fact, know ii world, that these refugees sw, re detained in Ttnki considerable portion of time against the natural w Turkish government, but in deference to the aPlir• and wishes of the government . of Austria. there to blame or to find fault with the gown Austria for the feeling On e eidertainell with relit subject. They did entertain alum, which was sincere ; but at the same time it was the opini Majesty's government that Austria had no right Dula nut r r,n n, sheaf rw afro rk•nc; of i al he utt hle ak the " eon- do foe t •1.. tn.nd. •,, Ail the lot t of the ti•optl .l not .11•111 , to st t.. this r ,bah{ tim 01 ha to tlicUttet • Mr. d the !IPP The Bill we The 1 THE DIVIS Adder) Arehdd Baru, Belle!, bAlate, BanYei Barra, Boutin Berett! Hooke Booth, Bowie