The Express. — London, England, 1847-07-22 00:00:00

COURT OF REVIEW. Ex PARTE BASTARD RR WISS.—NEWTON AND TOT NESS BANIE.—Hie Roomy gave judgment in this case, dis missing the appeal from the decision of the commissioner. Ex PARTE HALL RN CAILET.—OTTICIAL ASSIGNEE HELD LIABLE TO PAT PERSONALLY 11111 DIVIDEND ON • PROOF ONITTED BT MISTAKE IN CALCULATING TUN DIVIDES ne.—Ths petitioner had proved a debt 0(3531.140.2d., which, by nestake, was omitted in the list of proofs used in making the declarers of a dividend. He now prayed that Mr. Belcher, the Mehl assignee might pay 181. Os. 10d., the amount of the dividend whisk the petitioner ought to have received. The wan el the eget provide that the official assignee shall semehe sad alga the list of proofs, if correct, and shall prepare broke eoetainieg as many blank &Aired warrants r say be socesury, 1 1 and fill up a warned foe Oath ditidend.—Mr. Rena and Mr. Tillotson, in sappset el the redden, eons add that under this order Merida issigat• eight In have ma that the lietaaareeededyileded this proses that had been ad mitted.-11b. ;Tod Mr. Maio, he the o ffi cial assignee, said that thiousi ass Zet odor parks, and particularly of the mildew te Who was bound to ascertain what peach had beim , the ditty of the official assignee being mu* b renitea the list for the purpose of ascertain ing the assedit ger dividend, eammaing the proofs to be accurately elMeib—The Chief Judge, who was assisted by Mr. Cerrieloseerentiascne, asked whether the counsel I for the 'MAY iisollper desired that the solicitor should be served with therpdillits, lathnating, ea far as his Honour might with purlieu de so, in the absence of a party inte rested, that the Nark IA& possibly, in that case, direct that the seßeiMit shoal relieve the official assignee,' either V! est Mr pert, her the responsibility which it was ta epee him by this petition. Mr. Basso and Mr. illis o irovever, sites eserstros with their client, Odd, that they desired serer the shee to be brought before the earl, and the chef then said that the meaning of the seder apperei i t m e d re, that the official assignee shard not sr* ruder the evereetness of the lists in point of ardor*, bet arid see that they accu rately represented the pees& whisk had been admitted, and his Honour was mere hedged Is this haprerion by Mr. Fonblanemel eenenzuros is h. At the mime time his Honour absolved the official reissse hem ail Mrs. Every other assignee, probably, wesiChave meted in the urns manner, and his Honour wished partiselarly to state his own, and, what was of more value, Mr. Fonblanque's high opinion of the way in which Mr. Belcher dis charged his duties. In this case the court would willingly have charged the public with the consequences of the oversight, had it been practicable. As the matter stood, however, the creditor must have his dividend, and there was no alternative but to charge Mr. Belcher with the amount, and with the costs of the petition. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY. Belle Mr. Comml=keer Rol Ix RE SIR F. C. lixowl.m. Thi r tukrupt was a banker of Cavendish -square, and this was a meeting for the choice of assignees, which was adjourned until the 17th of August next. No balance sheet having as yet been filed, we cannot make any statement with accuracy respecting the amount of the failure or the assets, but we have been given to understand that the debts amount to about 30,0001., and that the estate consist of certain mining property. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORFOLK CIRCUIT, Cionunnor, JOLT 20. Behre Mr. Justice 'Naimoli. THE QUEEN O. BIDWILL.—INDICEYENT FOR DIS OBEYING AN ORDER OF MAGISTEATES FOR THE PAY MENT OP A Bun DUE FOR CHURCH RATE.—This wu an indictment against the defendant for disobedience of an order two justices made under the 53 George 111., c. 127, for the payment of a church rate of lea. soared upon the defendant, and 11. 12e. 3d. costa. It wu tried before Mr. Baron Parke at the senses for this county in the spring of 1845, and the defendant was found guilty, subject to the opinion of the learned judge on certain questions of law, one solution of which was to have the effect of arresting judgment. Those questions were subsequently debated in town before the learned judge, between Mr. Couch for the don, and Mr. O'Malley for the defence, and the decision 'l.cu mec was then postponed. Mr. Justice Patteson now read the judgment of Mr. Bares Parke, which, alter stating that a •erdi t must be entered for the defendant on the second and third counts of the indictment because only One rate had bean proved, that the question wu whether the first count was bad In arrest of judg meat, and reciting the substance of that count, went on t• say that " the first and principal objection made to this count wee, that it was insufficient to allege that the rate was ' duly ' made and allowed as by law in that behalf re quired, and that the defendant was ' duly ' rated therein at Its., and that the facts ought to be stated which constitute a due making and allowance of the rate, and a due rating of the defendant. The general rule is undisputed, that the facts and circumstances constituting the offence itself must be averred on an indictment, otherwise the law resulting from the facts would he a question for the jury. Bat there are two answers to this objection. The that is, that there is a distinction between the allegation of facts constituting the offence, and those which must be averred by way of inducement. In the former cue, the circumstance' must beset out with particularity; in the latter, a more general allegation is allowed." Aft7x ee ti and commenting on several cases, the judgment thus : "In the present case, there can be no doubt that the offence for which the defendant Is indicted is the disobedience of the order. The introductory facts are alleged only to show that the justices had jurisdiction to make that order, and that the order was therefore obligatory, and they therefore fall within the description of induce ment. Another answer is, that independently of the allege- >.~_ __ THE EXPRESS, THURSDAY EVENING, JULY 22, 1847. tats Enttllignus. HOUSE OF LORDS.—WzoNtsoAr. CLAIM 7: 7113 — 0; SATs Awn LIL —The eammittee for privileges, consisting of Lord Shaftesbury (chairman), Lord Ly nd hurst, Lord Brougham, Lord Camp bell, and other peeve, sat at 10 o'clock, to hear a wanes esamined upon the claim mad* by the Rev. Frederick Ben jamin Twiselton to this butiny. His petition to her Majesty, praying that the said title and peerage might be declared to belong to him, was referred by her Majesty to the Attorney- General. and upon his report the petition, with that report annexed, was referred to this house, and, by the home to the committee. From what pasted between Sir Frederic Thesiger, who (with Mr. linthank) was counsel for the petitioner, and the lords of the committee, we understood that the only object of the present meeting was to take and perpetuate the evidence of the witness, who is about the age of (8, for the purpose, as we understood, of extinguishing the pretensions of a rind claimant to the peerage. Mr. John S,ein (the witness) said he was born in 1769, and in 1796 (being then resident in Edinburgh), and after wards, he cohabited with a woman who was an actress. She bore in Scotland the name of the Hon. Mrs. Twiselton, and was always so announced in the play bills; but in England, when she and the witness were living together, she passed as Mn. Stein. She gave birth to a male child during the time of the witness cohabitation with her, about the time that he was elected to represent Bletchicyly in parliament ; that was about nine months after their first acquaintance. The child was brought up as the child of witness, and he did be lieve he was his child until he had reason to suspect the woman's fidelity to hint, and that she had had intercoursa with another. The witness had afterwards fallen into embarrass ments in consequence of the failure of a house with which the firm of Stein and Co. had transactions: and he did not see the child for many years until in 1833 a man came to him representing himself to be his son. He mid he had been in the navy, and witness told him he could not do anything for him, and ads ised him to follow his profession. 8 1 questions were put to the witness by counsel and by peers, the answers to which were entirely lost be hind the bar, in consequence of the feebleness of his voice and the confusion caused by strangers there. The further proeecution of the claim was postponed till next session, it being distinctly understood that the witness's present examination was not to dispense with his attendance next session should he then be able to attend. The house having been formed, their lordships proceeded to give judoment in the following ease*: " Lord Carney' sad another v. Blundell and others—Misnomer of`• Devisee." Upon the motion of Lord Brougham this ease, which was set down for judgment, was postponed to next session. The facts of the case, arising on the construction of a will, were fully stated in the report in this journal at the time of the arguotent, on the 28th and 29th of June last. EQUITY COURTS. Wore the lard Chancellor. THZ ATIORNIT-ORNERAS IL ALDERMAN Ginns.—Ac. COUNTS OF A CMORCHWARDIN.—COSII.—An information was Wed at the instance of Mr. Rock cud other inhabitants of the parish of St. Stephen's, Walbrook, London, against the defendant, for the purpose of obtaining from him ac counts of monies received by him, as churchwarden of that parish, since the year 1823, and of removing him from the office of churchwarden and trustee of the parish property. The Master of the Rolls, on the cause coming before him, in 1844, ordered the accounts to be taken by the Muter with a set off of all payments made by the defendant on account of the parish. The Master made his report in June, 1846, finding that the defendant had, item 1823 to 1843, paid over 17,0(101. on account of the pai WI, and received of the parish property in that time only 12,7001., together with rates, amounting to about 3,5001. more. And the Muter found, em the whole, that there was a balance of 5921. due , o the defendant . He had claimed a larger sum to ' be due to him, and a sum of 6501. claimed by him in respect of costs was disallowed by the report. The cause came afterwards on the report and for further diree tions before Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, who ordered the defendant to pay the costs of the relators, and also of each of the select vestry as were made co-defendants with him, except the other churchwarden, Mr. Belly Atkins. , 1 The defendant Gibbs appealed to the Lord Chancellor against that decree, and Mr. Lloyd and Mr. Humphreys on his behalf contended that there was no precedent (or such it decree as the Vice-Chancellor's. The relators in the infor- • nation had failed in establishing any of the main points in their case, and upon such failure they did not ask for the d lendatt', removal To c-smpel him under the circumstan ces to pay the cons of so much profitless litigation was a hard ship to which the court would not subject a man who ap peared to be entirely innocent of the charges brought against him.—Mr. Bates appeared for the respondents, and asked that the further hearing might be allowei to stand over for his leader, Mr. Swanton, who was then en gaged in the House of Lords. —The Lord Chancellor refused to comply, saying it should be distinctly understood in that court that no use once put in the paper for the day should be allowed to stand over on account of the absence of counsel.—Mr. Bates then proceeded to argue that as the suit was made necessary by the obstinacy of the defendant in refusing to render any ac count to the parishioners, and as the relators had succeeded in gaining that object, it was but reasonable that the de fendant should pay the costs.—The Lord Chancellor, at the conclusion of the argument, said he war not dissatisfied with the Vice Chancellor's order. It appeared that the defendant bad often and positively refused to give any account of the parish monies received by him, and he thereby caused the information to be filed against him. It did indeed appear that instead of being • debtor he was in advance for the parish. That fact, however, could not be ascertained without the filing of the lafritellas ; for the defendant, all through, refused coinissito usenst yids say oolopt kis awn select vestry. Had the dadmodsot oossaaolod to socaoust properly, no charges would probably hat been preferred against him ; and that the chore Anted in pivot was cot an answer to the right of the other parties to their costs. His lordship affirmed the order of the Vice Chancellor, and dismissed the appeal with costs. &fore the Vice-asansellor of England. COOK. C. CHOLMONDELIT.—VALIDITY OP • VI ILL.— Qrsatios or Ixemerrr.—The arguments in this case were concluded on Tuesday morniog. The question arose upon the will of Sir Gregory Osborne Page Turner, dated 11th of July, 1841, by which he directed his trustees to pay an annuity of 2,0001. out of his estate to his daughter, and the residue of his property he gave to his wife for her life, and after the decease of either hie daughter or his wife, the testator directed the whole to be paid to the turvivor,withremainder to the children of his daughter, in manner therein men tioned ; and he directed that if his daughter, or any person is her name or on her behalf, should dispute his will, or his competency to make it, or should refuse to confirm it when required so to do by his trustees, or if any pro ceedings should be taken at any time by any person whomsoever by any possible result of which a greater benefit might be attainable by her than was intended for her by the win., and she should not formally disavow, stay, or resist each proceedings to the full extent of her ability, then the testator revoked the annuity and all the other benefits given to her by his will, and directed his trustees to pay her an annuity of 3001. only, and after the death of his wife, to ac cumulate the surplus of the rents, and to stand possessed of the same in trust for such person as should first become entitled to an estate of inheritance in his estates. The testator died in March, 1843, and his daughter, who was his heiress-ablaw ' married the Rev. Charles Fryer. After the death of the testator, the trustees requested Mrs. Fryer and her husband to execute a deed confirming the will, but they refused to do so, alleging that Sir Gregory Page Turner was not sane at the time of making his It appeared that a commission of lunacy had been issued against him in 1823, when he was found a lunatic. The finding of the jury was subsequently travemed by the testa tor in 1826, but the commission was never superseded. This bill was filed for the purpose of establishing the will, and a trial was directed to take place in the Court of Exchequer to ascertain whether Mrs. Fryer, by disputing the will, had for feited her right to the annuity therebfbequeathed. The cm was argued in February, 1846, when the Barons of the Exchequer decided that the said annuity and the other gifts to Mrs. Fryer were forfeited by reason of her hav ing disputed the will, and having alleged that the testator was incompetent to make a will. The ques tion of forfeiture was now argued, and evidence was produced to prove that the testator was insane at the time of making his will. On the other hand, it was endea voured to be proved, chiefly by the affidavit of Mr. Maberley, the solicitor who prepared the will, and who had been on terms of Intimacy with the testator, that although the com mission had not been superseded, still that he had so far re covered from his insanity as to be in a fit state of mind to make his will. Mr. Stuart and Mr. Frosting appeared for the plaintiff ; and Kr. Bothell, Mr. Lee, Mr. .1. Parker, Mr. Teed, Mr. Saunders, Mr. Willcock, Mr. Lewin, Mr. Fisher, Mr. Walked, Mr. Schomberg, and Mr. Piggott, for other parties. The Vice-Chancellor said this caw appeared to him to be in a most singular position, and he did not recollect any case resembling it. It appeared that a commission of lunacy had been Mud against Sir Gregory Page Turner in 1814, which was afterwards eupenseled, and • second commission was lamed in 1823, that Listed undisturbed till his decease, which happened in March, 1843, a period of 20 years, or thereabouts. It appeared that Mr. Maberley was the who prepared the will, and advised the testator. Of this gentleman his Honour spoke, designedly, with the greatest respect, for it happened that he had known him ever since he was a child. At the same time it was necessary for him to make such observations as he thought fit, in regard to what had happened concerning this will. The will was !tamed in 1841, at which period Mr. Maberley had various interviews with Sir Gregory Page Turner, and there was full time for the testator to understand what he was doing. The evidence given by Mr. Msberley appeared to his Honour to amount to this—that submission to the existing commis sion of lunacy was assumed to be evidence of the sanity of the lunatic, and a dense to oppose it was looked unon as evidence of insanity, and, in proportion as he ceased to oppose it, that was thought to be a return to sanity. Sir Gregory did not appear to wish any opposition made to the commission, except so far as to be allowed certain i=ces, such as a carriage, some pocket money, and the on to walk out. His Honour could well understand that his mind might have been in a state of tranquillity, but whether he had attained that perfect state of sanity which the law required to enable him to make a will, was • matter which, he thought, required investigation. He considered it a fearful thing that • commission of this nature should be allowed to exist (or twenty years, and that at the expiration of that time a transaction should take place between the lunatic and a perm, who, like Mr. Maberley, bad known him from a boy—the effect of which was that the lunatic was induced to execute a will, sad that without any notice to the Lord Chancellor, who was the person appointed by government to be the guardian of all lunatics. It was a most important thing for the due administration of the affairs of mankind that such a transaction should be thoroughly WWI. It appeared that the particular clause in the will which had been under dissuasion had emanated from the mind of Sir Gregory . Pap Turner, but he weld not he' p think. l ing that the clause la question yea in some measure evidence of a conselousnmeeathepart of the lunatic himself that he was not of sound mind—be mused to have a secret feeling that be was not in that stab Oland which the law required to make the will valid. Umber thus circumstances kin Honour thought that it was nisi drield• that en issue should be directed, end that the sass &add be brought before • jury, and that the mail p eeper person to require a further ince,- titration was Mr. Henry Fryer, who was trustee of the TOW nage articles of KM Fryer, and who was bound to Institute an inquiry in order that it might be determined whether the inheritance In the property had descended on Mrs. Fryer or not. BTILNI o. HAT.—Coors OP A SVIT.—The particulars of this suit which was butiested for the administration of the late Mr. Ducrew have already been before the public. The eel). question now raised was, out of what fund the costs should be paid, whether out of that moiety of the estate which was given to the children of the testator, or out of the moiety left to his wife, or out of the general fund. Mr. Stuart, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. De Oex, appeared for the dif ferent parties.—The Vice-Chancellor decided that the costs should be paid out of the general estate of the testator. Haire Vieethancellor Inhrlst Dam. LANOI1•11 O. ORBAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANT.— INioNcTmE.—Mr. Bacon and Mr. Pole moved ex parte for a special injunction to restrain the Great Northern Railway Company from entering upon lands at Holloway, to which ' the plaintiffs were entitled as tenants in common.—Mr. Wigram appeared for the company, and contended, that, as the company had appeared, the motion could not be heard en parte, end cited " Perry e. Weller" (3 Russell, 519).—The Vice-Chancellor said that on the authority cited the objection appeared valid.—Mr. Wigram then said that the company were anxious to have the question ,involved in the ease de tided at the earliest opportunity, and he would therefore consent to the motion proceeding, although he bad not seen the affidavit.—Mr. Bacon and Mr. Pole raid that the com pany were about to take possession of the land, with out having complied with the requisitions of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act,theB.sthsect.of which provides that if the promoters of the undertaking shall be desirous of en tering upon and using any land before an agreement shall have been come to, or an award made, or verdict given, they may deposit in the bank either the amount of purchase money and compensation claimed by any party interested is, er entitled to sell and convey, the land, or such a stun ea shall be determined to be the value of the land, or of the party's interest in it, by a surveyor, appointed by two jus tices, in the manner prescribed by the act, and may give to such party a bond under the seal of the company (if a corpo ration) with two sureties, to be approved of by two justices if the parties differ, in • penal sum (equal to the sum depo sited) conditioned for payment to the party of the compensa tion money, payable according to the other clauses of the act, with interest. Upon payment of such deposit, and tender of such bond, to the non-consenting landowners, the act enables the promoters to enter upon the lands. It was objected that the bond tendered in this case by the company wan a bond to the plaintiffs jointly, although they were tenants in common, and that the sum secured by it was only made payable "on demand." Other objections were, that the proceedings before the justices had taken place ex parte, so that the plaintiffs had no opportunity of objecting to the valuation, or to the sufficiency of the sureties; and that the surveyor appointed was the same who had previously valued the land on behalf of the company, and could not, therefore, be regarded as an impartial judge—Mr. Wigram, on behalf of the company, contended that the terms of the act had been complied with, and that it would altogether in terfere with its intentions if companies were obliged to tender a bond exactly in conformity with the title of the land owners, of which title it wan clear the company could have no knowledge at that stage of the proceedings. The Vice-Chancellor said that as the proceedings of the company had been en parte, they ought to have been strictly regular and correct ; a condition which did not appear to have been fulfilled with regard to the bond given in this case. His Honour thought the railway company were not entitled to deal with the several shares in the purchase money, and with the several rights of the parties, as they had done, in making the whole money payable, as one sum ~ p an a joint account. It did not appear that the plaintiff; had misrepresemed the state of their, title to the company, nor could the company be considere d an Ignorant of it, when regard was had to the terms of the notices:which they had !creed upon the plaintiffs. His Honour therefore thought the bond irregular, independently of the circumstance of the sum secured by it being made payable on demand only ; but, in this roped also, his Honour was inclined to think there was an irregularity, and that a demand should net have been made requisite. The company, therefore, had not entitled themselves to enter upon the lands under the statute. It did not, however, fol low that the injunction must issue as a matter of course ; and, therefore, he wished to hear whether any arrangement could be suggested. It was then agreed that the company should undertake not to deal any further with the property till next Tuesday, and should lodge a precept for a ury as speedily as possi b le ; and if the precept was not lodge d before Tuesday, the company would not interfere with the property until the precept wan lodged. tion of the fast of the rate being duly made, and soppoeing that allegation to he struck out, the rest of the count shows that the mug tun had sufficient authority to make the ordrs,by nom alf than being a sufficient information by MAO'. them jurisdiction. The church =ea psalm whom %broaden the justices acted, were the =pilaw a reoeive cad collect, for the rata being un- Mae Way who then fill the office can see for it in the asilsolastlod wart. sad I think that their information alone ts i ttseimihaise. irraspectise of the truth of the facts cen ts in Awarding to the wade of the 63ed Geo. 111., e. 137, e. 7, takes Is their ordinary saws, the fast of a rate duly Impaled aa a patty and ales the am-payassat al it by the party, era made to the jurisdiction of the magistratato make statari s or a Vymeat. But the pro vision which follows, that thejesdessare to e :amine upon oath into the merits of the said asetplatat, and the power of appeal to the unions, lead to the infimenee that three are not conditions precedent, and that an laiormation on oath of a rate duly made in which the party was rated, and of the refusal by that party to pay,would be enough, if supported by sufficient evidence, of which they are to judge, to give the magistrates power to decide, and make an order for payment, se that the order, if made, would be valid and could be enforced, whether de facto there was a proper rate sit e llroper demand aid refusal or not. This is, generally mg, the case where justices have the power to decide ju 'cially. The case of a poor-rate under the 43 Eliz., e. '2, a. 4, is not the same ; for the wording is different. Under that the validity of the rate is essential to the power of a justice to issue a distress warrant, so that if the rate has not been duly published, or the party proceeded against be not an occupier within the perish, the warrant is unauthorised, and the justice is liable to an action of trespass. Whether the fact of a demand on and refusal by the occupier is essential to the jurisdiction of the justice to issue the warrant, or his decision on the evi dence thereof on oath before him is !sufficient, has not, I be lieve, been decided j but I have always thought it would be sufficient, and that in a special plea by a justice Wan action of trespass it would be enough to state a rate duly published, and that the plaintiff was an occupier, and rated, and that there was a complaint on oath by the overseer that he did not pay on demand, and that fact was proved to the satisfaction of the justice. I think that in this case, if then was a sufficient infonnatioa on oath of • church rate on which the defendant was assessed and of the demand and refusal, the magistrates had jurisdiction, and the order WAS valid ; for why are the magistrates to inquire into the merits' of the case, and adjudicate on them, unless their adjudication is to be binding, especially when it may be made the subject of appeal ? If this be so the information is sufficient, as set out in the first count. It shows that the magistrates had jurisdiction, for the rata is alleged to have been duly made, and no ease has been cited, nor can I find any, to show that the order of a magistrate is not valid if founded on an in formation which does show jurisdiction, merely because the information is open to the objection of informality in making a mixed allegation of fact and law instead of stating the facts only. I think, therefore, that the first count is good, as for as relates to the principal objection. The second was that it does not appear that the church wardens were authorised to collect and receive when they demanded the rate. I think it is sufficient that they were so when the rate was neglected and refused, which is the offence. The third objection was, that the averment of the warrant was defective, beause it is stated " that it was recited as therein recited," without stating what was so re- cited ; but enough of the warrant would be dated without mentioning the recital. It was said also that it was not ad droned to any one. I think it is sufficiently averred to have been addressed to the defendant. Another objection was that the warrant was not averred to have been served a rea sonable time before the day of appearance. I think it must be assumed that the justices satisfied themselves upon that point, otherwise they would have acted unjustly in making the order in the absence of the party, and the intendment is always favourable to the validity of an order. Another ob jection we, that the order should be set out verbatim ac cording to the tenor. There are precedents both ways. But, u it is not necessary in an action on a judgment, I do not see why it should be so in an indictment or an order, and I think it is enough to set out the substance correctly. There are two more objections; ens that the church rate is not averred to have been in force when the order was made, the other that the warrant was without date. As to the first, it is averred that the rate continued in force at the time of the indictment, and that the justices found the portion of the rate mourned on the defendant to be doe to the church wardens, complainants, which, I think, is quite sufficient. As to the second, the date of the order is immaterial : this is not a warrant of commitment in which it is necrisary to de scribe the time when imprisonment is to commence. For these reasons I think that judgment ought not to be arrested." Mr. Justice Pennon inquired of the prisoner whether he was able and willing to pay the costs of the prosecution ; if he was, judgment should be respited to the following assizes to enable him to do so, and, in the event of payment, he would hear no more of the matter f—The defendant pro fesaed himself unable to pay the costs or any fine, and pressed for immediate judgment —The learned judge said that he wee, under these circumatancer, compelled to pass a sentence of imprisonment ; and, as it could not be tolerated that any one should assume to defy the law, the sentence must be severe, in order that others might learn from the prisoner's punishment that the law was too strong for those who ven tured to resist it. The sentence of the court was, that he be imprisoned in the goal of the county for six calendar months. On the application of counsel his lordship ordered that the I defendant should be confined with the first class of mis demeanants. MIDLAND ClRCUlT.—Limcoist, Jima 20. Ci.u. am. THI QUERN AT TES PROSICUTION OP PAYNE T. INMAN, CLERK. ASSAULT BY A SCHOOLMASTER. The prosecutor is an independent gentleman, residing at Leicester, and the reverend defendant the head master of the Grantham Free Grammar School. The former had two twin sons at school with the defendant. On Sunday night, the 16th of May, Arthur, who is now be tween 16 and 17 years of are, on his way ta bed, threw • jug of water through the window of another apartment at some of his schoolfellows, who were in front of the house. This coming to the knowledge of Mr. Inman, he proceeded upstairs, found the boy =deeming, and desired him to put on his jacket and go down into the library. He did so, when Mr. Inman there charged him with having been impertinent to one of the ushers, and also with throwing water at his schoolfellows. lie denied the former, but admitted the latter charge. Mr. Inman then began to cane him, and the lad refuting to cry out, the rev defendant pursued the castigation, exclaiming, " Well see who is tired first." He occasionally took breath In the infliction of the punishment, until, is the course of a few minutes, the lad was compelled to cry out, and his master desisted, and told him he might go. Mr. Inman followed him up stairs, when young Payne requested him to look at the state in which he was. The defendant declined, saying that "he could not help it," and, leaving the room, locked the door. The boy, in company with a twin-brother, who was at school with him, made their escape from the house at 3 o'clock the following morning, and having walked to Melton from thence, after breakfasting with one of their father's tenants, pro ceeded by the railway to Leicester. On examining the boy's back and shoulders, they were found to be as described, by Mr. Fullager, a surgeon, Miss Payne, the aunt, and Turner, a man servant, a mass of black bruises, the akin being broken in some places, and blood upon the flannel jacket. Fomentetiona were applied, but it was some time before the young lad recovered the effects of the injury he had received. These facts formed the subject of the present indictment. Mr. Whitehurat, for the defendant, contended that be had not ex ceeded the punishment which the boy justly de served, and that there was no evidence of malice. Man witnesses of great respectabi li ty gave the defendant a high character for humanity.—Le rd Denman thought a anions assault had been committed, and he did not think it was re quired that in such a case malice should be proved. School masters had no doubt • right to administer correction, but it must be done moderately, and not be disproportioned to the offence committed.—The jury found the defendant Guilty, but recommended him to the merci!ul consideration of the court.—Mr. Hurafrey did not press for punishment.—Lord Denman was happy to hear it. CAMWM. Conan—Before Mr. Baron Rolfe. MIIILDIRS BY PolBo2l.—Mary Anne Miller, an inte resting young married 1101111121, aged 27, was charged with the murder of her mother-in-law, Mary Miller. —The prisoner and her husband lived at a vil lage called Bernethy-le-wold. The deceased and her husband resided in the same village. The old people had been ordered to take some sago, having beset unwell, and, though the prisoner was not proved to bare mixed it, the bad stated she had given the sago to them, being with them almost alone during th eir illness. The mother-in-law died ; the father survived, but has over since been paralytic. Suspicion having been exerted by sub sequent events, the body was exhumed, and the presence of arsenic detected. The facts in this can not being suffi ciently brought home, the was acquitted. The prisoner was then arraigned for the murder of her aster-In-law, Hannah Jickele. It would seem, from the testimony of one Elisabeth Watson, that between eight sad nine o'clock of the 30th of June deoeased mime to her and asked if there was anybody in the house, because if there was not she would tell her something, but she was net to tell anybody. She went on to say the prisoner had come to her house that morning, and said, Why, you have no fire ; I'll lay you have had nothing warm this morning, and if you will go with me I will fry you a pancake"—that she went and had the pancake, but believed the prisoner had put something into it, as she felt ill—that she would have left the pancake but a lodger was there, and she thought it would look filmaanered. The prisoner was proved to have bought some arsenic of a grocer in the village, stating she wanted to kill some rate—Mary Winter proved the deceased called at her house in the village about ten o'clock, saying she had eaten some pancake given her by the prisoner and believed she was poisoned and would die. Sh e s t a t e d she had not taken any poison herself, and had MOM had any in the house ; that she then left and went to her own house, the witness following her, where she saw her on her knees I violently sick and saying the pancake had poisoned her. She wished her husband to be sent for. She continued and died about six the same evening. The witness told the prisoner what Jickels had said, who cams and said, Oh, Hannah, do you think the pancake has caused you to be so ?" Deceased was too ill to make any reply. The prisoner had been desired to keep what deceased had thrown up, but when asked about it she said it had got thrown away. Death was proved to have resulted from arsenic. The jury found her guilty, and sentence of death was pronounosd. There was • third indictment against the prisoner if the sseond had failed. The prisoner betrayed no feeling throughout the trials. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—Yeux, Jvi 20. Nowa OUT. TEM MIRIMILD MIIRDIES.—The whole of yesterday was occupied in the trial of Patrick Reid, for the triple murder, at idirfield, which wu resumed to-day. II(Mewl M'Cabo said: I am 35 years of age. I have Itawkid la the neighbourhood of Mirfield for the last flee years. I knew Mr. and Mrs. Wraith, and was at their house on the 12th of May last. I was out hawking that day, and left home about eight In the morning. I was at different places in Mhteld, and amongst them at the Shoulder of Mutton Ina. I called thereabout twelve o'clock, and saw Patrick Reid there. I knew him only by sight, and did not speak to him. Front the inn I went to other planes, at one of which I exchanged some pots for some rags, a large bone, and a puce of rope. After a time I went down the foot-reed to Mr. Wraith's house. I went into the back yard, and set my basket down before the kitchen door, which was shut. I knocked, but no one answered. I put down my bag and waited a while, and then knocked again. Then I heard • footstep, se if up stairs. I heard at descending the stairs and become snore distinct as it approached the kitchen. I knocked again, and then the door was unlocked, and opened about six inches, so that a man's face could be put out. 1 asked if anything in my way was wanted, and wu answered in a low voice, " No." At the same time I heard something like a soft moan or sigh. On the wall, by the side of the door, opposite to the latch, I saw sprinkles of blood. My attention having been arrested by the white wall, the face, and the marks of blood, I looked dawn on the floor, and saw other marks of blood there. The person hold.ng the door open, seeing me look down on the floor, partially closed the door. 1 , then retired a few yards off, and was in the act of lifting my basket on my head, when I saw that the window shutters were closed. I then went on my way; and when I had got about forty yards off, I heard a noise, as if the door was suddenly closed. There was only my basket between me and the man who came to the door, so that I was not more than a yard distant from him. That man was Patrick Reid. When I left the house, I went on to John M'Kinnell's, the King's Head-inn, at the top of the carriage. road leading to Wraith's house. From there I went to Smithson's, a few hundred yards off, where I smoked my pipe,a Zijionkneedll's At he a vy h S e n a tt r ill showern's . of 7:: n fe ll 4. w i t rh.ln in , l l went to Cherley Flint's, at Robert-town. I had some rags and bones for him, and wanted to borrow some money from him to purchase some glasses to take back to hlmfield. Flint wns not in, and I waited till he came, and got from him the money. I then went to Hightown to purchase the alums. When Flint came in, after I had waited, he asked If we had heard anything about the murders at Mirfield. Being asked where, he said at Wraith's, where the old man, his wife, and his daughter, had been found dead. I then made a statement to Flint. When at Hightown I called at my own house, but did not stay three minutes. I went back to Flint's, where I saw Will Sheard, and we had some con versation about what I had seen. Then I started back again for the Shoulder of Mutton, at Mirfield, with the pots and glasses, but was apprehended by the constable, Lead beater, before I got there. I have known the prisoner Reid for about seven months by sight, but not by name. I have met him occasionally as we have been hawking. Various other witnesses were examined, and gave the same evidence u before the coroner's inquest and the magistrates, all of which has been published; and we need not repeat it.—John Noble, gaoler of York Castle, stated that the day after Mr. Watts, attorney, visited M'Cabe, Reid sent for witness, and seemed to wish to know what had passed between M'Cabe and his lawyer. He asked if I knew. Told him I did not. He hesitated a good deal, and said something. I said the public believe that two men could not do it. I also said that the police were after two other men. I think it right to say that I did not caution him, for I did not expect to be calle d on as • witness. He then spoke (but I cannot recollect the precise words) to this effect: " There was none in it, or none knew of it, but them two." I did not put the words down, and cannot be sure of the words. One said he used the word " them." My " impression" was, be meant " them" two, M'Cabe and himself. He said, " Us two."—Crota-exa. mined : Will not swear that those were the words used ; for it is possible that I may have been mistaken in their import. The case fur the prosecution having closed, Mr. Serjeant Wilkins addressed the jury in defence, in • speech of three hours' duration, contending that the evidence was insuffi cient to show that Reid was the guilty party ; but that, if it proved anything, it was that M'Cabe had himself com mitted the murder. No witnesses were called in defence. At twenty minutes before six o'clock, his lordship com menced summing up, laying considerable stress on the com munication made by Reid to Mr. Noble, the governor of the gaol. The jury, after being absent for two hours and forty minutes, returned a verdict of Not Guilty. NORTH WALES CIRCUIT.—CAINAPSON, Jutv 20. Before the Hon. Sir W. 11. Sleek, Kat. The learned judge, in his charge to the grand jury, briefly adverted to the state of the calendar, which exhibited some half.doren felonies, larcenies, and miedemeanours. IMPUTED PIUS nut( .—Edicard Evans, an attorney's clerk, iadicted for perjury at the last assizes, and who traversed over to the present assizes, surrendered to take his trial. He pleaded "Rot Guilty." The accused was charged with having, as the principal witness in an action brought in the court of the sheriff for the county, against the Dinorwic Mill Company, by his employer, Mr. R. B. Griffith, solicitor, to recover a bill of costs, amounting to 81. 35., for professional service', sworn falsely that the partners of the above mill had instructed the said R. B. Griffith to raise a certain sum of money on the aforesaid property, which, it was contended, was false. In consequence of his evidence, his r mployer obtained a verdict for the amount claimed.—The evidence having been heard, the judge summed up, and the jury re turned a verdict of Not Guiley. POLICE.-YESTERDAY. BOW-9 MEET. FORGERY. John Finlay was re. examined, charged with uttering two forged cheques for 11. each, on Messrs. Coutts' bank, both purporting to be signed by Lord Skelmersdale. He was remanded on Saturday, that he might have an opportunity of going to Birmingham to seek a person named Wheeler, who he said had given the first to himself and the second to his father. This person had been found, and was brought up this morning. Mr. Mullen, said that he was at present only prepared to go on with the case an to the first cheque, as he was not prepared to prove the uttering of the second, which had been uttered to Finlay's father. The evidence given in our paper of Monday was repeated, and Finley was new examined as a wit ne6ll. He repeated the statement he had given in defence on the former occasion—that he had received the first cheque from the prisoner in payment for a pair of trouser*. The officer who had been sent to Birmingham, said that when he took the prisoner into custody he said it was not a forgery, and he would be able to set it all right.—Mr. George (Messrs. Coutte' clerk) proved an envelope found on the prisoner to be in Lord Skelmersdale's handwriting; a prospectus was also found on the prisoner, of the " Lanies' Society for the more effectual Suppression of Cruelty to Animals." The prisoner was the secretary, and Lord Skebnersdalc was a subscriber.—Mr. Henry having expressed his intention to remand the prisoner, after some discussion as to the most convenient time, it wan agreed that the prisoner should be remanded till the 10th of August.—Mr. Finlay complained that a report had appeared in some of the papers highly injurious to his character as a tradesman.—Mr. Henry said, that as the case stood on the former occasion there were strong grounds for suspecting Mr. Finlay ; but as evidence had now been given which completely exonerated him, he (Mr. Henry) had no doubt the same publicity would be given to it as to the statement complained of. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Buyswo • House.— John Savage, horse-dealer, was charged with having de- I trended Mr. George Mansfield of 181.—Mr. Mansfield went to Aldridge's Repository in St. Martin's-lane to buy a horse, and engaged him to assist him in buying one which was for sale on Tuesday. On that day the defendant said to him, " Oh, the horse won't be sold yet, it's at a high figure in the catalogue." Witness went into a pubLic-house : -two persona came in who appeared to be busily engaged in driving a bargain for a horse. They could not come to terms, and one of them made an appeal to him to look at the horse. De• feclent, as if accidentally, came in, and said that it would bees well to look at the horse, as it might turn out a bargain. When they got to the stable, a hone was shown. The de fendant looked at the animal, pronounced it perfect at all points, and whispered him to buy it immediately. Complainant declined buying of the two men, but told the defendant, if he chess to buy it, he would repurchase it of him. The defendant consented to this arrangement, and complainant gave him 181., the price asked, which was given to the alleged owner of the bone, who told him to take away his berm. Complainant said he had not bought it, but he was told that he and no one else had bought it. Complainant then gave defendant into custody far the fraud. The hone had been sent to the green-yard to be sold for ex es. —Mr. Hardwick said that whatever might be the real character of the transaction— and of that there could be but little doubt—the complainant had made a debt of it, and therefore his remedy against the defendant was not by a criminal process.—The defendant was willing to give his I 0 iT for the debt. He should, however, take further notice of the way he had been treated, and he therefore requested the complainant to give him his card.—The complainant said he should give Dim no card, nor should he receive en I 0 U from him.—The defendant was then CLERKEV&L.—CONFZeBIO9 OP MURDER. —John Ramsay was re-examined, charged, on his own confession, with the murder of Mr. I L. Williams, in November, 1844. The first examination was reported in ourpaper of July 13. Further evidence was taken, confirming the prisoner's state ment of his_guilt, and he was remanded for a week. THAMES.— hilarootneo.— Five HUNDRED POUNDS PENELTIRS.—S. Skotthe, 1. Kanechin, E. Moller, O. Drat*, and M. F. Mielke, seamen belonging to the Prussian Ship Selina, lying in the river, were charged with smuggling 361 be. of tobacco, which had not paid daty.—Mr. Potbury, clerk to the Solicitors of Customs, appeared on behalf of the crown. The two first-named prisoners pleaded guilty, end were at once sentenced to pay a fine of 1001. each. The ethers pleaded not guilty, and evidence was gone into. C. A. Davis, a custom-house officer, hearing that tobacco was to be run from the ship, went on board and saw Mielke with the other prisoners on deck, with a bag in his band. On the officer boarding the vessel all the prisoners went into the round house, and were followed by Davis, who found a sack containing 36 lbs. of tobacco. There was a small quantity of tobacco in each of the prisoners' berths, which did not for m the ground of objection, and was only retained by the men for smoking, and had been reported to the revenue officer who " rummaged" the vessel. The prisoners, who pleaded not guilty, called the men who pleaded guilty as wit nesse., and they said they were in bed and asleep at the time the officer came on board and knew nothing of the matt er. This evidence, after their plea of guilty, created much laughter. Evidence was given, clearly showing that the prisoners intended to " run " the tobacco, and that it was imported in illegal packages—the law only allowing tobacco to be imported in packages each containing 300 lb. or more.— Mr. Yardley said the ship was liable to forfeiture, and the whole of the crew on board at the time the tobacco was found to the penalty. The prisoners only had been selected, and very wisely, and be sentenced them to pay a line of 1001. each. The Are Prussians were committed to gaol for six months in default of payment, and informed if they had any application to make fur a mitigation of the penalty, they mast pnition the Board of Customs. MONEY MARKET. WiDNISDAT EVIN7/10. The funds present the rather anomalous feature of a decline day by day, fractionally gradual indeed, but in the aggregate amounting to importance, in the absence of any operations of magnitude, sufficient to indicate that capitalist speculators had come to the conclusion that prices were too high and could not be supported. Consols at the close of business had fallen to 881 to for money, rind 88/ for account. The difference of per cent. lees upon the prices of yesterday is not so much of importance for its amount, u for its being in continuation of a before declining market. Dealings took place indeed 1 per cent. lower for money, but the rates substantially were as stated. Reduced Threes, 891 to i. Three-and-a-Quarter per Cents., 904 to 11. Long Annuities, 9 1-16 to „-. Consols scrip ato prem. Exchequer Bills, tits. to 11s. prem. India Bonds, 53. to 10s. prem. Bank Stock, 197 to 8. India Stock, 244 to 6. _ . . It is the exceptional feature of the stock market before referred to, which imprints upon this gradual depression of prices a more legitimate, and at the same time a more discouraging, character, than it would possess if, in reality or appearance, it were the result of speculation carried to whatever length for an object in view. Money is becoming more in demand, and ac commodation more "tight." The signs of this are visible enough to all observers. From having surplus funds in lodgment with discount houses is theeity on call, or for time, on beneficial returns of interest, the country banks, or many of them, it is understood, have not only been recalling these fends, but are re quiring extra accommodation themselves, in the shape of re-discounts, or have been bringing portions of their public securities to market, either for sale or to raise loans upon, for the supply of their own wants, and to meet the claims upon them in their own localities for customary facilities. This will be more peculiarly the case with the banks in rural districts, and with agricultural constituencies, now that the operations of harvest have commenced I when so much more for wages and general expendi tare has to be disbursed. For money supplies the country banks are not without competitors, who bid high for them more over, with the additional important inducement to lenders of the security of the high rates for a term of years. Various railway companies of the first rank are in the field,:inviting tenders for loans at 5 per cent. for terms of three to five years secure. These tenders, liberal as they are, and more so as they would have been esteemed some few months since only, are by no means so eagerly sent in now as they were, and would have been, some three months since only. It will be remembe red that somewhere about that time the London and North Western Com pany, which may be fairly placed at the head of all the railway interests, advertised for tenders for a large loan at 5 per cent., in sums of not less than 3,000/. each. So greatly, and justly also, was the security esteemed, and the terms no less so, that the list of subscribers was filled up within a few hours, and they who applied for a share the day after were about a day too late. Complaints were made, besides, that a certain injustice was done to the general public by fixing the lowest amount of each tender of loan so high as 5,000/. This loan operation took place at the precise period too of the money crisis, when the Bank of England was laying on the screw. It is curious to mark the reverse now, when, apparently at least, the Bank is under no disquietude, and, though money is rather more scarce, yet there is neither monetary nor commercial crisis. The same great railway com pany is again advertising for tenders for loans at 5 per cent for a term of years, with the before so desired intimation that tenders would be admitted for sums as low as 1,0001. What may be the precise extent to i l which offered subscriptions may have reached cannot of course be known out of the directorial cabinet, but as the advertisements have been and are still con- tined from day to day, It may be safely inferred that the list is not yet filled up, nor the sum required completed. Other railway companies advertising for loans are not, it may be presumed, much more favour ably answered. It will thus be more distinctly understood why money accommodation is less easy than, so close upon the payment of dividends, and without any extra ordinary town demand, might otherwise appear to be explicable. The fall in Exchequer Bills is significa tive of the fact of their being brought to market for sale, or to be loaned upon, by banks having occasion for money. These are usually the largest holders of a securities so convenient to raise finds upon, and carry ing meanwhile a daily return of interest. It was reported to-day, that the directors of the Bank of England, not unobservant of the signs of the times, were not so free of discounts as before ; that, indeed, they had rather advanced their rates, and were requiring 51 per cent. upon first-claas paper. The report is given as it was it, circulation, without vouching for the fact, or having had a convenient opportunity for ascertaining its correctness. The Bank, however, would stand quite justified in such a course of action on the sole ground of the French loan impending, and the continued decline in foreign exchanges, which, it may be fairly assumed, lie and has been the result in some, if not in a great, degree, of the draining combinations of capitalists who are already committed to that financial operation. It is in the interest, and for the security of the Bank to prevent hard money being taken out of the country in present exigencies as much as possible, and in any case to make it dearly purchased. The foreign market was in the same inactive state as usual, with scarcely a change in quotations for the most part nominal. Brazilian, 84 to 5. Mexican, 19 to t. Dutch Two-and-a-Half per Cents., 571 tot ; the Fours, 901 to 1. Spanish Fives 211 to t ; the Threes, 311 to 1. Portugueee,3ol to 1 Danish, 85 to 7. Russian, 111 to 112. Peruvian, 35 to 7. 1 A communication from the Spanish American committee elsewhere explains, as this morning was anticipated, the case as it stands respecting the nego tiations with the government of Peru about the debt Bask Stott, 199 South Be. Block, 9611 11 per Ct. 1.01. Bei Drawls fee AM., 09 9 03 3 per Ct. Carole Aar .149 i 3 Prr CI. C 0 0 .19 DerlP. I P. Now le Pet Ct. Asia*, 911 ooi I 1 ka. sum. LI AN. ft , 0 II I p. Lose Asaa.,exp. Jan 0,1160.91- 111 Ditto, £550, 11 IS p. ladle Stork, 1111 Ditto, *mall, II 11 10 IS p. Do. Boob, .Cl,OOO. 10 . . TOILEION 11 , 13WDS. $ per Ct. BratMee Deeds. $4 4 per Ct. Spaitha Hoods, Dlv. ft= r, per Ct. do. New Hoods, 18/9 mid 1 Nov 1810, 24 I 1889, 129 11 per Ct. tipsitlek Reeds. 111$ 29 per tit Data Ys.. l 9 gait, 47$ l9 per Cl. lie. eh B:. II dell .471 0 per Ct. 1dea1.8.1844.191 4 per Ct. Diu* Certificates. $1 90$ DWG, 1104.,Ju17 36,199 . !Ain, hli N. : Per can : : ' I . 55 11l 1111 di iI 9 I 50 49 D. ... WI II .. . t Do. . . ~ 101 10 . .. ; . I . P.l.e 5,110 . . . L. ,......- MOW Kowa' .. . gra. Do. 5 1143 . . . , LOMB I IM Do. 44 . . . so Troormy k5O& . .Seto 11 De. Mom 110rewtotm. Jet.r . l7. 'Apt Debt, Two 6.44-Italt pp, Cents.. VI retwor, 501 bllll. Throe per Cron, 70 mosey. 701 bins: Poor per pen, 00 Emory, OSP bilk. Cloun. Comp.. lON nosey, 1709 *Wt. !Rehab,. on Load., 11 51 , two soatbs, ll 07. Dotoberri, 30 00: two too•Urr. LS II 77 SI 111 7$ iii ii SPennin Ameiticen Boma.—The following additional correspondence has pared between Col. Yturreguy and the Committee otepaniah American bondholders regarding the Peruvian Snags debt : Aostio.biere, July 12, 1641. Fir,—The demeittee ar Speahh Arrler Beedleidess, referring to the bar whir tbr bad the hewer to rare to year treetleeey as the flth Mem bei fere te balm whirr driers sereiet the nen mg. yen have ernfolieeen min 1, the lesdhellen reird Ihe etre forpi debt et ree.-1 bow the El la. It. issnram, Clehrem. To hie Isodkar CoL J. 11. =7. 171ohlet lieelfreerry Ira the at Bets. (Ifeeeklea.) Iradts. my 15,1641. v kbeterßradthelllhlerlaaeetsiere,thatthe governnnet dram heer test efileffillgelles to the no tional rferleet a n g =at seareales pro. which 1 substage be fleeenMeigllne, led iiheragelli I wenete you In my note at as NS kat. At the Nor Ire I bre le rata to ro. that the ef Fen earear bias Net Or arerltre of lards ey sherd eggeint ass at ago mom Om* whew legervenflee l adlonsurat and lirldhera of hie deht ary = proceed: re premiee. alter a rsteredellherdea= to the arra that Ode le the ft ver and dorm sae proarty iamare mb. the = see which the erentroat so orb ones. God prawn pee .— J. hi. Yrveasarr.—To O. S Babineee, RAILWAY NEWS. There was a dull uarket in shares yesterday, with out, however, any absolute decline of prices. FiatlS, Jct.'s SO., Teals sad °Maas Parle and Loa . &MIS and Nam *Mews& Mamtll 81; Dankaaa - 07 i - 60 1143 Hi 112 10 IN SI 467 10 171 la as at so - 1170 NS 441 00 i r e *I Si 07$ 7$ Pb .: o .. 641 16 ON 441 II 417 SO 474 T7lllO 441 SI 01 so Ai is 07 SO ITO II iii as MISCELLANEOUS.— Amine To SUMMON - IL —W. are informed, an indloputable authority, that this railway will co, Minty be opened down to Boulogne not biter than October neat. SHARB LIST.- , Pe•e•ler et limn la so der: UM, of lbw °NOON. J VLT 21, Who When' rim. iiii.r. I IC i! acidercao4 .44•44.40-• 454 Gaßoroy II 1 1 I: 06.4414.1 . :e y D01 6 462110. • BYO. It 0014t0 lora TI IT i 17 si, Birk laneo44. 4 14. 0 11144016, Stan., & Dl= sf II 10644.1 art &raw .•• par tp. 1: cut...„.... D.. nerols 4 m ut, Sp. if sookiop6morAin , I Old. SS Claisdreas pf Do. 4 &arm If Sal Wan pod YokUol l 4. 106 C 44.4464 U 46 10 Do. lot Mo. 4 par O pas Ip. 10 De. Id Ciao, I po. Cr id. 14. IL Gbramoll II Dahlia 4 JaVaal itsaaa..l3 114. VD Cs4/ara CessUao 44 De.114(014: 6 •1 4 •V4 44. Of Do., do . .. . . 406.0 4. 74 Do. York Nalsoadaa of 4 1 AO 114.1... Rao. 10 10•1 1600010661 'lo ea /0. 10 Do. New Al fea la. 14 Do. do. 3.00000. 844' 4.4 ip. le Ira LetaeoGoot.ro I lea Is /1/4 mut 1114.41.4•0•4-4 01 pm Mil 1: 4 4".41."41"""* 800t0r f:D. D. :i : 11. : . : : :: :: :: jr."6 : k . D440444 7 6 , i ''' W i r 1 0:41 11 1" 1 47 1 1 ' 6 '.11r 4.. PIP: . 14 tOsapor p.. N ita , . 4 44, 1 4 4 .........7,7 1- 4,..;(;.1" :, i s: HA. 1 Onset liertl6 el 11•041144614 US souni : 4 ...D.D. D• D.D.,. .... I r A Nw ' . . Naha . 1 1 .. . . . . .... ~, i d 0 0 ...., .. . . ,, r :I 'S 0 0 7 i , A :4 . IS Do. Naha 7 De. New. 177 .. l7 7"irli rl itp. IS fhaddlarplad. Noodua.;l Sp. S D.., .46. , Vtis644 'par to. SO ,11•111.60 60107 11004 , 03 , Da 4 sham ....... :LI Op. 110 . De. a 04•44. .. - ,lO llp. IS .4.•., Awry 14 140444414164 nes to 13 I Da. do. 4 Norma& 0+ ill. •I. 40 :Wooster mad W11614.'04 10 I Do. Viirde l4 Gp. 66 , Lute mod Drodler.l 69 sap. If lamb ond none 7 IL 124 Do. Dar 41 03. 14 Do. Prof. II P.O Oast_ 1 Old. 3 Leeds. rear.. Stoscb 443 . lie. Mao. 444 N. Jou. I &Wen , 1 14p. IN Lambe mad Bl4a wall 61 7f 4 Do. No, No. 1 'par 4p. 31 Do., 40 No. II par 10 Lod. Brashum, S. Oo 00 I 10 Do. amt. 364.4 4 4 4.. •• 3 op. t Do. do. 6600.4. 6p. C', So Do. Prot. Coov.Sp.Ct. , S If 12.1 Laa4aa and thratmea 104 . IP De Lualloo " r/I. V044e0.111 4 1 11 D.. .2 , ./1471. L. 48. 16 17p. I Da, do. N.......... !ilk 3 Do. Oaths lief 40 Do. 401. pla. X. Et B 60 D.. 101.6%., X 4 X •:sf . Da. IN. A., K. 4 B. OH 04p. A. 101.0., M. 6 A. ea Itt , Lea., Ogford, 4 Cholla. 1 014 4 I Last. .0 6. WOl6OOO 444 74 4 DO. New Oa. SQL 444 60 314 Do. 11466 , 401— 44 2 19. $4 DO. Now, 401. WI A. 4. Catilhe 4 Op. I r.. 11.-,i r . SCS .. 4 D. Be. 404 If, Leo... foberrorg.s . ft TS 11.4.8. Pod zy Grua 0.4 Donads . _•. Ilawbooler w UAW. 4 - 6 •—• Do. * Wow uer • 1 I Do. l7ll Do. thafimUii '''''' • . l e n DO. lib* (DOt i: DO. idOo7lol 4 1.3.. a 4. t*sio Mad. Mw 4 .. mar 44.4 Soya/ moo y Wook•Ale. • /Wok •••• De. Mow I / /Woad Do 01. slum Do. 103 Worn • • Do birm. • Derby D.C.. 13 , 1•A10.4 p.C.. YAM TM (hull Sooresollo salbor•l33 Do. De. llortll Sktehlo Cholloofoo, Nora 11,11144 Do. 6 A. Da. j Yam 13 46 Do. fooonow. Do. Tiara I rr.ton .. Do. N. . . • 26e1 .. •• 46 Do. istosem... . 1 11. 44 14 N. 6ewtw Mime ; to lIfortilor• • ••• •• 6 7 66 • 1 D. N Do. Morn l4ll .l em 1 North titalfordo/Wo I N 6 ~Z A S i rZ CIL4/4:) • kor4 /Worn 1 thlW. Worwoo,• 7/ 6 6 6 froWso mod Wore i Do. Wenn 6 Do. die Soadlawo.lll4. • 341:1 , 1 1P * 1:114•11.4 wog Dadra . 'llowdoliOntral • 1:14•4644.1h01150d O. llor &th W ink ♦ . IS/wow • Bin., do. 4 6. DOA* CONO Shropoldro Vaasa g WIC Dow, i M. 1 Wad Otaloodoldn- II Wall Wows • Dorm N. De. N. (W. 8014.1 pi Do. N. (WI. it 66 , Do. N. OW 2 W.) 1!1, I Do. X. (Y. 10L) 4 im" , South IW lll4 1 11.T0r4 Dow. • Goole 16 • rm. Zwwww 1 6 66 , Yaw/sod • kolllow6 1 7L Mnt Julies Um. 6 1,6 6 6 dta,..d. • l7l i Eid. .Mm. , A &Mean , Took aad liewevatia '77l 4 7 Do. Peden... Took Do • :io& 4011aad A. Preformee Wow. 1711116, Do. E.& tt.11136...,, , :y • 111 14 • 1 144. '! Id.'lp. COMMERCIAL AND JIAELETIC PRODUCE.—MINctxo-LANE, JOLT 21.—The sup? Nur bet shows great firmness; a full amount of businees b ee p done by privatecontnet In West India at a elude higher prices than veneray 1,100 bids sold.—Refined very steady.—Slotrem ban ken in demand: 300 eons sold—Porto Rim, 130.; St. VioceeD, I ss. 6c1.; Dominica, 18a. There has Oct been a public sale of dodoes to-day, which has given &dull appearance to the lane, which fren to setly occurs on a Wetinesday.—Ooffee wears a firm appearance.— • The sale has not shown any alteration in prices to.day ; stoat 801 chests sold, catalogue A In drat hands.-- Tallow dull, 41s. on the spot; 475. the lanthree mantha.—Rum neglected: proof leewards, Jamaica, 30 to 8f o p., 4e. Id. to 4e. 7d.; good common qualities Demerara, SO to 300. p., 36. 7d. to 4s.—Tea : The tone of the market has been decidedly firmer to-day, in consequence of the nem frm China; buyers would have freely given the full prices of yesterday, but the importers very generally have withdrawn the porcela vtously offered, expecting higher prices. There were free buyers st the full prices of Monday, but the quantity bought was very mall_ Duty paid on Sugar to last week: London, Liverpool, Bristol, Ild, and the Clyde, 3,733,041 cwt. ; to the same period last year, 2,217,311 cwt; increme, 037,450 cwt.—Duties paid on Tea in 1811 ta ha week : Lend( n, 14,137,71410.; Liverpool, 2,977,1011b5. ; 392,0711b5.; Hull 13.3,1231 he. ; Clyde, 1,094,8141b5.; total, 11,r9,1 lbs. ; mule time M 1840, 18,7841131 W. : decrease, 44,3901b5. COTTON.—Lrmeroot., JrLY 21.—The market to-day was Wry dull, sad the saki were 4,000 bales, all to the trade. COALS. Jos, Gl—Cup, 1N; sad, I. 11111,411.4. St • Pr WAND. Chester Yale,. I. CI I idles Vida Delassa Hartley.— .......... Gd Male EGG Het coo Tutteld Moue lle 111 Wall. lad Lembtaa lle al I 1.;;;.; ii".;7.7a;r1 41 se loolar•• 4. 1.40111 IN 4 1 •••11.2.114.1.4 044C•ms 4 1 ak F a 16 Oa qp,.....(w.r 044•4 rt 111 0•••••••••- 7 11.%•••%. ...... UN 1•41.• •imera.• ary 14 Isai • i f Laectook 111 Namur and Lim • t• Iforthr+P. of rm a a , 4 • Ofleass sod bordesai 1.1 • ?ark •ad Lyons ls II Peru sa Orio••• • • all Porit andi /10•••• • lark and St••• 1•4•, 34 14 limn mut Hun It Lathe •am 111•••• l7 II S hare •1411 //••••••- y S Welt MM." 4 SHIPPING INTELLIGENCIL—Mine. LL arre•ma. 0014-aart. ecr.!•ae Deane . . co Holland . . 0,0 lattle,Ma Boma o Macke sat Waterford .01 interleaf . ammo. . ( Harms, mo. Dmesbades .0 1 Mame . . . 0,1 Do Marseilles 0 t W.l•ata, AMA' Gum II ire. 0 0 Itlres• Joy nie Bortea ma a Breen Md. B Ramberg . .ae Welturnas. . 01 1101110, rots 34/ 01114•IWIN let, 21.—Arched : W. Tbornborrow, Guernsey; Larommonene, Mamie; Alt -n, Bremen; Janet lost, Riga; lon Palmerston, Odessa; Star, Boulogne; W. Woolley, blauritlua ; rims, Tarragona try, Newfoundland; Ocean(lmes, Constant. topic ; EmeraK Boulogne ; Batavier, Magnet, ItotteMem ; Lula, Trieste; Venezuela, Ostend; Egerton, Honduras.-6ailed Rested, Mediae; Dart, Madam; Bertha, Stettin ,• Juno, Frederick. H. John's; Whittington, Hobert Town; T. Hughes, Port ; ewes, Tobago; Triton, Ostend; Christiania, Gomm ; Southareptas, Calcutta ; Dart, Newfoundland; W. Broderick Quebec ; Merl; Cadiz ; Emerald, Boulogne ,• Yenned Cherie., Flushing; Sir R. PM, Harlingen; W. Wilson, Sydney ; Nymph, Patras; Agenoria, Balks; Mary Ann, Leer; Wilberforce, Hamburg; Sir E. Banks, Ostend; Rapid, Ocean, Attwood, Ro•terdarn ; Isabelle Blyth, Calcutta; labs. stone, Sydney ; Wert Brook, Odessa; Elmaketh Buticham, Lem. oeston ; Woolsington, Newcastle; Tallentire, Ceylon; Magnet, Hoe. linden • Deatitne, Consteminople ; M.oey Ann, Mediterranean; Bid, Audaccit Westmoreland, Baltic • Robert Rankin, Ghent; Under, Amberigel ; Glory, Hamliurg ; City of London, Rotterdan; Wolf, Baltic ; Queen, Leghorn. Livearoot, Jets 21.—Arrired Ciudad de Vittoria, Harem; He raid, Porto Rico; A Constantinople • hirers, Alexandria (Egypt); Belle Bridle, Copenhagen ; Mary Hannah, Porto Rico; Gm Met, New York.—Sailed G. Armstrong, Rio Janeiro; Ad:roads* New York; Aram Si. and Condor, Cmstantinople; W2Ahilolll Irving, Barton; Matilda, New York; Defence, Quebec; 11.104 Sierra bone; Reeled, Virginia, and inside, Quebec; Framed, Philadelphia; R. Burns, Odessa; Union, Ostend; Horner, Taganrog. Olt U. Buckhem and Rapid. (Advertisement.]—Nzavors bk:BILITY, now, AND Lowrie or Sri Comm Wf HOLLOWAY'S /qua— Extract of • letter from Mr. a Beverley l'June 17, INT. To Professor llolloway.—hir,—For yews I have been troubled wilb indigestion and Denature, emeing a complaint commonly terra the nightmare, frequently os mare that I dared not go to bed 54 weer together. I obtained adore flan the most proddrt io the Medical Profession, without any good result. When suffering bow it in It. worst stage I was prerailed upon to give your pille a ter : by their use lan now quite well. I never gout better in my ilk nor enjoyed mender health." Sold by all Druggists, and at Pram *or Ildlory's rotabllehment, 544, Strand, London. !!aria FL at Maaraktre, bemires, the elk el F. Aglow. E.g.. oorelos, to • deaglitee. AlitialitiON —At Atillatighae. !10de... the wife of A. P. Askew, Ma, M.D.. serge. ad Itegbastat 8.N.1., of • sow. DATLT.—!47II,.I Seenaderobad, Madras, the wife of Capt. W. 11.70, .7th Onmadters, of • am- MOMIZIL—JeIy lg. at Meleitk-etreet, Idlabutgb, the •ife of the Ike. W. 'gym, of a daughter. CRAIOI3.--Jl4y IS, at Chiolswood, itogboryttsbire, the wife of Copt S.N. Credal., P.N., of a dentate,. Ch 1774 —April IS, at Sedalia Factory, Bombay, tee yds of A. J. CWT.. Teo , of a sou. DACKIIII —Jai) IT, at lietheastoa, the wife of Capt. S. C. Danes, 2.14 Maws. DATMN PORT.—July IS, at Divestry, the Etre of the !Dv. O. DaDdiates of pa. DICIBIRO.—May 11. at Marriage., Betab.y, the wife of Me Rev.l.C. Orthrts. of adement, DI:DOSON.—Msy ae, at 1.1.117. Bombay, the wife of A. D• 1801., DM. of • taunter. HUGH IL—July IS, the wife of Um lee. L 0. alsolee,viaarrat LW/ON* ' of a sm. rooTLll.—Jaly 17, at RaMmvar. Down, tho wife of Om. FuterN, 114 impoetiag mmuaratader C..4t 0 mud, of a still bum damtater. IitFTCHIE.—MIy 10, at Cowries:me, Bombay, lbw W. itiwhie, of a daughter. 117011—Apell Y, at berm, Bushey, the wile at T. J. Lm, ile of a ma. lIMITM.—IttIy 11, at Westbrook Cottage, Werthiag, the wale It *Milk. tag., of a deviator. 11, at Markheath• pork, Mra 0.11- MeleMsw.Dt d. 4.aghter. WO usnorsz.—July IT . at Wooliwleb, Claiming, Eire of M Wdehmme Seq., esp.:a Royal Aniihry. of a daaghter. MAII.IIOIII. ALLAN-00AD.—April 10, at Marta, Yawl. J. Ails., Frai le UMW youngest dmegliter of the late B. Ord. , a. CAIDSON—ILINO.—J sly 111, at by Um 1.,. A Dream, Win. H. M. Osman, of Renames, Moody, to Oman, dadiamer of the lair Dr. • ot Moy. COTTER—MAIM —July SO, at Lambeth, P. P. Cietter, DA. Ll. " Hermon Emma. woad demister of the late J. Mails, Zeo LN.. of 0- haai -road, Camber w.ll. DANIIIi—OARDNMR.—.of 11, at Oolacomusi, 'Jai - 3 . Doane, ArillMry to , relkt of ,M 11. M. J. 0•08•42.6. Of ratuiteastoserry. MILIMIT—MOILTON —la Cloomal. 0. Xelldt, ~ tarridam Ca aawAir2f _Ma Boa J. Dacha. LISRa—IbII. at Titan, Marna Oa In. LBW. Vo lta= iMmaradiff% le Clarz v edipm m.r. =W in o Taw. J. Ida% 0011.—Mily mat aim, Imam to ilia briar. Midair M. Parma Bampit aWi dam Muth ter of T. J. Nam. laa"mftratMaakareardo. WALLIX—SLUND t —Jul: II t at lafra. a• dd AlA,Maar of Item Wats. Jame Malw, , Matfat di .... I daaalaerof leap! Itlag ASMIII.IrK. dna SIN pr WILLIAMI—TOTIUMIXOXAM.—ftIy " at famatimi daddi am_ T00t..? . Taro., by IM Wm. I. Mom. J. LIVIIIIIMILI4- " kaL ini nZ D. 57.4 'mama% to ammo& laaba, sED AMP" et isoft. la, at 114 13" ..= WNI IN WO. 3 " . • ▪ a. Y. Aadatetia ea Tim tbe Maliamada If Was. a Tama Siont &VOW all* M. W. Dswaa. il.of Iffieled.T.TAVT BELL-4a M. at Odesomima i Malmo Aar. taut aarwe t f W. Imu. Imo.. Bombay alai oadder. COOX.—day la , at Otheataro, WOOL Met C. L. Coot, it L Cllol.l.llf.—At Germ [ym. afar Idomma, calm awd.." / " .313. that am fit X Oroplatamo. amid M. DA/OCT.—Jay IS. at , lab at ISW, C Oakattaltall, am MOM Mandy. C.M. KICK& —Lora X, at Me Cap WOW Sim as Madi tlflosia. W. P. Owtou alvll wird" •••••a__ A r.. La.. for:aft dramaimat mrsts. Pam= allacti mad` mama "Cia o L-1 07 IX la Omallik-www. N" Le a 1L1319-4•172,.. bard she as Os pames d rierthrilt. XX, amody pram a amottati, 111UNTIMML—italy X, W. mg., .iraisaar mail camp Wawa lllVart taloa ma of UM Mamma °dryad/O S , ONtak.—Mar 14. as Chid-Ma LT. Madoiri, x a.. 7.; • bio Mart, eat .1 a* VWI Dr. Dem,. &tray Der dims,. Molll.lll.—amil se, as lermiksq. MOWN. 310. k. now ad y Porrcli.—/aly IS, aoiraltia. _NUM r‘Pr i. d Law Raw. X. Panto. maw 1,44 SITIENKATIZ."—Aktr, si Isawr le. st Gown . ISl6 7:=4. °lllll.".lll" l r a rrasi, af "' het SCOTT —Mardi 4. ea Mara die laar Emnodo, bowl odablikkami TEDo=—Xay a at ttalkart, Mani. Mies J. TIMMS. id id•T•I L WILCOX. V, at Iratamr, liamod, MEM. Mk WM.: la .—Ardi XI, at Otleada. :MOUT gd tar 33 3 ftweiajkoi., sea.. rot It . aa Om. 3 =Ele ack7=.l. ma wear . 6 1 1 rawaart ComM "" 3 3C. 4 ;1 •itett i **l flia I A