The Express. — London, England, 1847-11-12 00:00:00

blocks and plates, for the purpose of producing these imita tion labs a; in consequence so which the preunt application was made to restrain them from so doing.—Mr. Thomas Parker, for the defendants, contended that they were quite inaocent of doing any act which was intended to defraud the plaintiffs.—Applicattom had been made to them for blocks and plates, which they in the ordinary course of bulkiness Lad supplied ; but the labels printed from these blocks were left blank in the centre for the name of the agent by whom the stout was to be sold, and they ought not to be liable for any fraud practised upon the plain. tiffs by other persons. The blocks themselves were not of a getter value than &s., consequently no emolument would be produced which could induce them to run any risk in the matter, and when called upon by the plaintiffs they had im mediately offered to give up whatever plates were in their possession, sod to enter into an undertaking and obtain se curity that they would not continue to sell suck plates.— The Vice-Chancellor said the fact was very clear that the thing of which the plaintiffs complained could not take effect without blocks being made from which the labels could be printed. The defendants, by their conduct, had made them. selves ancillary to the injury which the plaintiffs complained I of, and it was no answer to say that they only assisted in the execution of part of the detention, for there might be a de *lra that should be divided into a great number of parts, and many people might be employed to make the whole perfect. He thought, therefore, that the defendants had contributed to the fraud, and it appeared that by their conduct they were fully sensible they had acted wrong. He should, there fore grant the injunction. Before AhE,Ctukaregor Knight Brune. BARKER v. NORTH STA FIO RDSHIRR RAILWAT COURANT. —TNJUNCTION.--Mr. Russell and Mr. Daniell moved, pur suant to notice, for an injunction to restrain the defendants from entering upon certain lends and salt works at Sandbach, in Cheshire ; on the ground (among others) that the bond served upon the plaintiffs with the view of entitling the company to take possession, without the owner's consent, under the 85th sect. of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act, was insufficient for that purpose. The defects relied upon were, that it did not extend to the whole of the land com prised in the notice given by the company to the plaintiffs; that it was not delivered until after possession had been' taken; and that it was under the sell of the company alone, without any sureties.—Mr. Matins, who appeared for the company, asked fur time to answer the affidavits, and said that, with respect to the want of sureties in the bond, there was fair ground for contending that the language of the clause did not require any sureties where the company was a corporation.—The Vice-Chancellor said, a sufficient case ap peered to be made for an interim order, until the motion could be heard, which was accordingly granted until next Thursday. Rebore Ince-asancettoe wirrant. JONES V. THE LONDON AND SOUTH-WESTERN RAIL WAY COMPANY.—CONSTROCTION OF THE WORD" HOrBB " IN THE 92/ID SECTION OF LANDS CLAUSES CONSOLIDA TION Acr.—Mr. Wood, Q.C. (with whom was Mr. Rogers), moved on behalf of the plaintiff, the owner of the Royal George public-house, near Waterloo-bridge, that the de fendants, their agents, workmen, and servants, might be restrained by injunction from taking poesession of or using and appropriating for the purposes of their undertaking one part only of the plaintiff's house, or from prosecuting the notices which they bad served for that purpose. The learned counsel stated that, by the 92nd clause of the Railway Clauses Consolidation Act, which is incorporated into the special act of the company, it is enacted that no party is to be required to assign or convey for railway purposes part only of any " house, building, or manufactory," for railway purposes; but that the company, if it requires a portion of the house, &c., should be obliged to take the whole. The defendants however, notwithstanding the act, had served a notice upon the plaintiff of their intention to carry a viaduct by means of an arch over the yard attached to the plaintiff's house. They contended that under the word house " was included the yard in question ; and that the yard would pan with the house as a part of the cartilage attached thereto. The act complained of was plainly, therefore, a breach of the section which had been cited.—Mr. Romilly, Q.C., and Mr.Wickins, contra, contended that the intention of the com pany was merely to pass over the yard by means of an arch, and that the damage which might be occasioned thereby to the plaintiff' e house would be of • very trilling description, and might be fully sompensated in damages. If th e court should be of opinion that the question of construction was proper for a court of law, still an interim injunction would not be neces sary to protect the plaintiff's right. The company were willing to pay into court the full value of the house, to abide the result of the decision at law.—Mr. Wood, in reply, said that the wall of the viaduct would pass within seven feet of the staircase and tap-room windows of the house ; and that the result of its erection would be to deprive the house of light, and, probably, to put a stop to the plaintiff's business. An interim injunction would therefore be necessary for the complete protection of the plaintiff, as the question of com pensation could not be properly settled after the business had been lost.—Judgment reserved. DUNCOSIBE O. LEVY—MOTION TO TAKE ISSUES Pno coNriaso.—ln November 1846, certain issues were directed in this case to the Court of Exchequer, to try the question whether the plaintiff had committed a breach of the cove nants in a deed of composition with his creditors. The trial was directed to take place in Trinity Term last, when the plaintiff made default.—Mr. Southgate, on behalf of the de fendant Lawrence Levi, now moved th at the issue* might be taken pro costae° epsilon the plaintiff.—Mr. Hallett, contra, stated that the default had been occasioned partly by the illness of the plaintiff, end partly by the circumstance that the plaintiff's solicitor, shortly before the time fixed for the trial, had been struck off the rolls of the court, upon his obtaining a public appointment. The case, therefore, was one in which the court would grant its indulgence by extending the time for trial—His Honour made an order extending the time for trial, but upon the terms that the cause was forthwith to be set down in the cause list of the Court of Exchequer, and that the costs of the present application were terse paid by the plaintiff. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. TEE QUEEN V. THE JUSTICES OF WILTSIIIII.I.—HATE THE MAGISTRATES OF WILTSHIRE POWER TO LITT • COUNTY RATE IN THE BOROUGH OF MARLBOROUGH? —A rule had been obtained that called on the justices of Wiltshire to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue for removing into this court, in order that it might be quashed, an order made by them for levying a county rate in the parish of St. Mary, In the borough of Marlbo rough. The rule had been obtained on the ground that the Municipal Corporations Amendment Act had not given to the justices authority to levy such a rate within the borough, and that previously to the paring of that act they were precluded from levying the county rate therein, bemire, as there had been a non-intromittant clause in the old charter of Marlborough, it war not within the limits of their commission.—Mr. Cockburn, Q.C., Mr. Slade, and Mr. Swains showed cause, and contended that as the borough of Marlborough was in schedule B of the Municipal Corporations Act, end bad not had a grant of se parate quarter sessions, the old charter wail gone, and the borough itself placed by the Illth section under the juris diction of the county justices, who, by the 55 Gee. 3, c. 51, a. 1, were empowered to levy the county rate within the limits of their oomminion.—The Attorney General and Mr. Hodges, in support of the rule, insisted that the 111th sec• tion of the Municipal Corporations Act gave to the county justices such jurisdiction only within the boroughs in ache. dule B as was within the general competency of justices of the peace; and that the power of levying a county rate, being a taxing power created by statute, must be construed strictly, and could not be treated as a part of the ordinary authority of the magistrates of a county.—The court took time to consider its judgment. CUMKIIIO O. INCE AND ANOTHER.—IS AN AGREEMENT VALID WHEN MADE PENDING A COMMISSION Or LUNACY AGAINST ONE OF THE PARTIES, I—ND FOR TRU PURPOSE OP PURCHASING A STAY OF THE INQUIRY I—This was ax issue directed by Mr. Justice Wightmen, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the plaintiff was entitled, notwith. standing a certain agreement executed in September, 1846, to certain deeds and writings. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff. Subsequently a rule was obtained for setting aside the verdict on the ground of misdirection. It ap peared that a commission of lunacy had issued in August, 1846, to inquire into the state of mind of the plaintiff, a lady far advanced in life, who had been confined in a lunatic asylums from the month of May previous. She attended the inquiry from day to day in the custody of two keepers, who bringer her from the asylum. After the case in support of dr commission had been terminated, and some witnesses had been examined in opposition to it, it was agreed between the counsel, with the consent and approbation of the pr commission, and also with the knowledge and sane= the Lord Chancellor, that the inquiry should cease, the plebs tiff be set at large, the agreement above mentioned, whirl provided for the division of a part of her property between her two daughters be entered into, and the title deeds of her property be handed to certain solicitors, to prepare a deed embodying the terms of the agreement. The deeds were handed over accordingly, and the plaintiff shortly afterwards brought an action of trover to recover them from the solici tor, who then took out an interpleader summons, on which the trial of this issue was ordered. The judge told the jury that the question for them to try wax whether the plaintiff had made the agreement of her own free will, and that if she had made it in consequence of the restraint under which she wax when she made it, she had not made it of her free will. This wax the misdirection complainedot —ld r.Cockburn ,Q.C., and Mr. Hance, now sheaved rinse, and contended that the question for the jury was, whether the agreement had affected her title whatever that was; and that an agreement made by a person under the circumstances in which the plaintiff bad made this was invalid. If she was insane when she made it, she had net in law the will to make it ; if she was sane, she made it under duress and unlawful imprison ment, and it was void. That she made it under the advice of counsel, could not make it lawful, if unlawful it was; and neither the approbation of the commissioner nor of the Lord Chancellor could make an agreement lawful, which was in direct opposition to the policy of the process which had been abused to procure it. An agreement made under the duress of imprisonment might be good, if consistent with the object of the imprisonment; but this was inconsistent with that object, because it contemplated the advantage of other par ties than the lunatic, whose good alone was contemplated by the commission. The agreement, therefore, was wholly without consideration.—Mr. Watson, Q.C., for the de fendants, insisted that as the imprisonment had been lawful, and the agreement made under circumstances that threw full protection rued the phintiff, it would be upheld by the court. He also submitted that the form of the issue made it incumbent on the plaintiff to establish her title to the deeds. The court took time to consider the judgment. BAIL COURT. Before Mr. Janice Patteens. SMITE V. WETNEKELL L CLERI.—PONES or TEE PRO. VISIONAL ASSIGNEE ON INSOLVENCY TO SSEVESTRATI • LIVING.—A rule had been obtained some time since to let midi a pessaiwatiaa of ths hying of W &Landsat, who had become an inoolvent debtor, at Bybeld, in Northampton shire, and calling on the Bishop of Peterborough to execute • writ of sequestrari facia+, and to pay over 1141. to the plaintiff.—Mr. Martin and Mr. Addison showed cause against the rule, and Sir F. Thesijler and Mr. T. Jones ap peared to support it, and Mr. Booth appeared for the Bishop of Peterborough, and prayed that whatever might be the decision of the court, the defeated party should pay his (the bishop's) tests.—The whole question turned en the construc tion of the statute 1 & 2 Vic., c. 110, as to whether the pro visional assignee of an insolvent had power to obtain a se questration, or whether that right was restricted to the general assignee.—The learned judge thought it was a ease of such importance that he must take time to consider it before giving judgment. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. Sitting. In snm°* BURTON, APPILLANT O. OEILY, ~, ab itSPONDEN7.—REOIII- TRATION Aereat.e.—This was an appeal from the decision of the revising barrister for the southern division of the county of Northampton, and the question was, whether the claim of the voter, David Hatfield, was sufficiently de.. scribed in the register to entitle hint to vote in respect of a successive occupation. The claimant in registering his qua lification had represented himself as the occupier of land at Coal-Ashbv, of the value of 501. per annum, and the revising barrister allowed the vote on the ground that there had been no hiatus in the term of occupation, it having been con tended, in opposition to the claim, that subsequent to the period of registration the voter had become possessed of • new species of qualification, and bad not sent in any new claim previous to the 20th of July. —Mr. Humfrey now appeared in support of the objection, mid submitted that the decision of the revising barrister was wrong, and ought to be reversed. The question was, whe ther a man who had sent in a claim as the occupier of land which. at the time of registratios, he did hold, but which afterwards ceased to be has property, could, because he hap pened accidentally to retain the same species of tenure or qualification, claim • rate in respect of a successive =ups tion. By the fourth section of the 6th and 7th Viet.. it was en icted that every person who shall not retain the same qua lification, or continue in the same place of abode as described in the register, shall send in a fresh notice of claim on or be fore the 20th July. Thus it appeared that every voter was called upon to send in his claim, and all those who were no: upon the register, or who, being upon the register, did not retain the same qualification, were required to furnish • new claim; and the question was, whether the fact of a man being properly registered originally was sufficient notwithstanding he had since become the possessor of • new and different set of premises. He (Mr. Humfrey) contended that the voter could not, fur the purpose of making one quali fication, couple together certain property which he held under two separate landlords. He might continue to hold the same kind of qualification, but it was not the same in the legal acceptation of the word.—Mr. Hayes, in support of the decision of the barrister, contended that there was no ground whatever for depriving the man of his right to vote. The 73rd section of the 6 Vie., cap. 18, stated that the lands and tenements in respect of which a person described his right to vote as the holder of property amounting to 50/. a year, shall not be required to be, the same, but may he of a different kind, and occupied in immediate succession by such person. The voter, therefore, in the present cue had properly de scribed his qualification, and the barrister was right in re taining his name on the list.—The court said they entertained no doubt in this cue either upon the strict construction of the statute, or tpon the fair and reasonable mode of viewing questions of such • nature. The 4th sec. of the statute expressly enacted that any person who shall not retain the same qualification in respect of which his name has been registered, shall send in a new claim on or before a certain day, and this was required in order that full information might be given with a view of ascertaining the identity o the party whose claim is under consideration. It was just as natural that he should give notice of his change of qualification as that he should send in his original claim. The legislature hod clearly laid it down that a party was bound to enter a new claim where his qualifica tion to be put upon a new register arose out of a successive occupation. In the prevent ease, therefore, the decision of the barrister was wrong, and must be reversed.—Decision re versed. SHELDON, APPELLANT, T. FLATCHEII, RESPONDENT. — This was en appeal from the decision of the revising barrister for the borough of Cheltenham, and the question was, whe- ther the objecto r had given a sufficient description of his place of abode in signing himself " J. Fletcher, 5, Sher borne-street," without adding the name of the particular parish in which the street was situated. It appeared that within a distance of seven miles there were " other parishes containing streets," but it was not shown that there was more than one "Sherborneetreet." The objector's Place of abode was described in the notice of objection in the same manner in which it was entered in the register. The revising barrister therefore allowed the vote, and he had stated in the case submitted to the court that it was not sug gested that there was any other Sherborne-street than the one described, nor that any practical inconvenience followed from the omission of the name of the town or parish.—Mr. Serjeant Byles now submitted, in behalf of the appellant, that the decision was wrong, and ought to be reversed. Ac cording to the 17th section of the sth Vict., chap. 18, the Ninon objecting was bound to describe his place of abode according to a certain form mentioned in the achedale. He (the learned serjeant) therefore contended that in this case the place of abode was not sufficiently stated. The description ought to have been, "5, Sherborne street, Cheltenham ;" and the case of " Wollett v. Davis," (4th Com. Bench Reports, p. 115) was an authority in suo • port of hie argument, that the nature of the objection should in itself contain all that was required by the act, without being aided by a reference to any entry in the register.— Mr. Keating, on the other head, submitted that the place of abode mentioned in the notice was sufficient, and a it had bean found to be so by the revising barrister, the ques tion was whether he war justified in that opinion. In the we of " Knowles o. Brooking " (2nd Com. Bench Reports, p. 226), one of the learned judges had stated that each case must depend upon its own circumstance, end it was quite clear that, according to the facts in this particular cue, the description " 6, Sherborne-street," was abundantly sufficient to convey all the information that was required. It was a matter of fact for the barrister to decide, and he having held that the place of abode had been properly described, the court ought not now to interfere.—Mr. Serjeant Byles, in reply, urged that it was not a questiea of fact, but one of law. The court held that the information required to Le given in the notice of objection involved matter both of law and of fact. The decision being prim& facie sufficient in point of law, the question of fact was for the barrister to decide. The description of the place of abode must, of course, be looked to with reference to the locality or district under con sideration ; and, supposing the entry had been read " 5, Sherborne-street, Cheltenham," no objection could have been raised. The question then was, whether the word Cheltenham was not clearly understood, there being no other parish but the parish of Cheltenham under considera tion, and there being, in point of fact, no reasonable doubt en to the identity of the person objecting. The decision of the revising barrister was conclusive upon the matter. Look ing, therefore, at the notice of object to in the way now sug gested—that is to say, with the word " Cheltenham" added to the place of abode described—the court were of opinion that it was sutficsent in point of law ; and the barrister hav ing held it to be so for all practice' purposes, his decision must be affirmed.—Decision affirmed. There were two cases brought forward, in which it ap peared that the parties had, " by an oversight," neglected to deliver the proper books to the judges, according to the provisions of the act. The court, therefore, refused to en tertain the eases, stating that they saw no reason for depart ing from the course pointed out by the statute, which ex pressly stated that the decision of the revising barrister must be final, unless the parties shall prosecute an appeal. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. Sittings in Sane. GOODE O. DUNCOMBS, M.P.—MIK/MU OF PARLIA MENT PRIVILEGED FROM ARREST FOR DEBT.—Mr. Willed renewed the motion in this ease which he had mentioned on Saturday last. It was for a rule calling on the defendant to show cause why the order of Mr. Justice Williams, made during the long vacation, for the discharge of the defendant from the custody of the Sheriff of York shire, should not be rescinded. The facto were very few. The plaintiff, Miss Chudy, recovered a judgment in this court and sued out a writ of espies ad satisfaciendura, directed to the Sheriff of Yorkshire, who arrested the defen dant under it. Oa the 3rd of September last a summons before • judge at chambers was taken out, calling on the plaintiff to show cause why Mr. Buncombe should not be released from custody, on the ground that he was privileged from arrest as a member of the House of Commons. On the 7th of September Mr. Justice Williams made the order in question. It then appeared that the defendant bad been elected • member of parliament, which at that time stood prorogued until the 21st of September. The order was made by the learned judge, upon the impression, which generally prevailed, that members of parliament are entitled to privi- ' lege from arrest for debt, fur 40 days before and after its meeting. But although that opinion was very prevalent, the learned counsel submitted that evidence was nowhere to be found that it rested upon satisfactory authority. The only privilege originally claimed, according to all the cues Ulu books, wee for "a convenient or reasonable time be fore and after the meeting of parliament." That applied to cases so early as the sixteenth century, and it was quite plain that what would now be considered " a reasonable and convenient time" for any member to repair from his home, even if situated in the most extreme limit of the kingdom, to Westminster, would have been then looked upon as very different. In 1526, the case of a Mr. Martyn, who had been arrested for debt, was brought before the House of Commons, and, even at that early period, all that was claimed was " a convenient and reasonable time," as the limit of their privilege. In 1807, Mr. Sheridan was arrested within a very few days after the dissolution of the Howie of Commons, and that arrest was never afterwards questioned. He was arrested upon the opinion of the late Mr. Baron Willey, then at the bar, who thought that the privilege should not exceed " • reasonable time." The debt was however paid, and the matter dropped. Nothing could be more absurd than to say that, with the facilities of transit afforded by modern inventions, 20 days were a reasonable and convenient time for travelling from one end of the kingdom to the other. Another objec tion to the order was that the learned judge had taken upon him to determine what was " • reasonable time." The learned counsel then cited " May, on the Laws of Parlia ment," which contains • resiew ul all the ewes ; at page 94 that author stated, that the prevalent opinion that the privilege of members of parliament was to be for 40 days rested on no precise authority." Forty days might have been chimed in the 16th century because that was considered a reasonable time, but the question was, what should be now considered a reasonable time, considering our improved means of transit and the completely altered circumstances of society since that period ? Baron Parke Mined the generally received notion THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 12, 1847. was that the privilege existid Ass 20 days alter and before the meeting of parliament. Mr. Willes said that if the court adhered to that opinion —namely, that the privilege lasted fur 40 days, it would be establishing it even beyond the time that esuld be claimed by the house on principle. Mr. Baroa Alderson : But, even supposing the duration of the privilege we confined to 20 days before the meeting of parliament, the defendant was privileged on the day he was discharged. Mr. Willa The time should be " reasonable." Who, under the existing state of things, could contend that twenty days were necessary to enable a gentleman to travel from any extremity of the kingdom to the other? This was not a caw occurring during prorogation from time to time ; but it Ira a transaction which occurred between the dissolution of one parliament and the meeting of another. All the dicta in the books related to time intervening between prorogation; the present was a totally different case. The privilege of a mem ber of parliament was similar to that of a witness, a counsel, or (if he might presume to say so) the judges of the land. To entitle any of these persons to privilege, it should be shown that he was, at the time of the arrest, actually en gaged, either in going to the court, or doing soma other pub lic duty which would have been impeded by his arrest. It is not pretended in the present case that Mr. Bun combe was on his way to parliament when he was arrested. If the order in question had not been made, the defendant might have applied for redress either to the court to which the privilege belonged, or to that in which the proceedings had been instituted. If he had appealed to the House of Commons, according to the authority of Martyr's case, that tribunal would have decided that the privilege should be confined to a " reasonable orcon venient time" for coming to parliament, and, certainly, they would not consider at the present day that a member should be allowed from the 3rd of September to the 21st of that month for coming up from Yorkshire to London. The court, after conferring together for a few minutes, intimated that the ease should stand over for a few days to consider whether a rule shoool he rimmed. grievances in his own way, and for the future have breakfast got ready for him at six o'clock in the morning. He would, however, not go beyond the law, sod should have a solicitor to reside with him. In one of the letters he stated his in tention of having a musical party the next night, and en closed the programme of the "grand concert" to the plain tiff. In it a " solo on the trombone," and a duet called " The Victim," between plaintiff and defendant, were an nounced :*" The Victim" by " Mr. Parrett," and " The Cruel Landlord" by " Mr. Friend ;" the doors " being stated to be " opened at twelve o'clock at night." The concert did not take place on the Want is question, it would seem, for in another letter the defendant made an apology in these terms "In consequence of the severe indisposition of the performer on the trombone, who get vary drink yes terday, the grand concert announced for thin seasiag ma not take place : it will take place to-morrow, when be performed the serious drama of " Israel in igypt," the part of " Israel" by Mr. Parrott, and "Pharaoh, who would not let him go," Mr. Friend.—The , learned judge said he re gretted that harmony was not restored after the concert without resorting to litigation.—The plaintiff and his wife were examined at great length, and swore distinctly that the servant girl was nut impudent to Mrs. Parrott, who took offence at Mrs. Friend sending the girl up stain to know who had broken a window in the drawing-room. They also proved that Mr. Parrott horsewhipped the page ; that the concert took place, the instruments being a flute and a key bugle, and that after it the performers sat out in the balcony in front of the house smoking and drinking until oue o'clock iu the morning, to the annoyance of the neighbours. He admitted removing a bill which the defendant had put up to let the apartments, as he had ne right to do so.—Mr. Dangerfield, for the defendant, contended that that circum stance alone was sufficient to annul the contract. He had a right to attempt to let the apartments which he could not occupy himself on account of the annoyance to which he had been subjected.—The learned judge decided that no one had a right to let the apartments without he first of all obtained permi , sion so to do from the plaintiff. The whole case rested upon the conduct of the servant girl. If she bad been guilty of such misconduct as would have justified the plaintiff in discharging her without the usual notice, although the misconduct had not been towards him, but to the defendant, and he had not done so, then the defendant would have been justified in breaking the contract, but he thought the proper way for him to have proceeded, would have been, to have brought an action in assumpsit against the present plaintiff fcr breach of contract, in not giving him proper attendance under the agreement—After the case had lasted between two and three hours, and long before the plaintiff's case was finished, the defendant con sented to a verdict being taken against him for 151. (without costs), the plaintiff to cancel the agreement. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. • Before Me. derjeant Adams. Toe DENNY AND FLANAGAN APPAIR.—In the course of the morning, Mr. Horry, the barrister, whose name has been before the public in connexion with a charge against a man named Flannatran, of having obtained 10s. under the false pretence that he was Mr. Harry's clerk, made a state ment in explanation of the matter as far as he (Mr. Homy) was concerned.—ln the outset, the learned serjeant said that this court had no power to interfere in the matter, but he thought it due to the gentlemen of the bar that the court should hear any observations Mr. Morey might wish to make regarding it. Mr. lorry then said that he had carefully refrained from making any communication to any other quarter upon the matter—not even to the press—because he thought the place where the accusation was first made was the best and most fitting place for it to be answered. On the Thursday of the last session he was met by Fianna gen and another person, by whom the ease was at first mentioned to him. On his arrival, Mrs. Denny was in troduced to him, and on his inquiry for the &positions, she showed him a copy of the warrant of committal instead, and when told that that was of no use whatever as instructions for the defence, she loudly complained that she had paid 16d. for it for nothing. He (Mr. Horry) then promised to wait for proper instructions ; but not finding the name of the pelsoner inserted in the printed list of canes for trial, he made inquiries in the clerk of the peace's office, when he was informed by the chief clerk there, that the case of John Denny had been tried the day before, an it was a custody case. He then returned to the Central Criminal Court, when Flannigan came to him and offered him a brief and fa to return to Clerkenwell and defend the prisoner Denny, when he (Mr. Harry) said that the ease had been tried the day before. Flana gan replied that the lad was at that moment in the dock, awaiting his trial, but from what he had been told in the office by Mr. Drew, the clerk, he supposed that the lad I was merely brought up for judgment ; and he declined to accept the brief. He heard nothing more of the matter until he saw the report of Mrs. Denny's application, and his lord ship's observations thereon, in the public newspapers; and as his lordship had recommended Mrs. Denny to communi cater with him, he sent for her on Saturday, when the whole affair was fully explained, and the report stating that Flan agan had said, when he received the money from Mrs. Denny, tnat he was his clerk, was read to her, and he (Mr. Horry) asked her whether that was true or not. She made no reply ; but her friend, who was with her when Flana gan had the money, took up the discourse, and said, •• to' do justice to all parties, Flanagan did not say he was your clerk; Mrs. Denny is mistaken there." Mrs. Denny continued silent, and only further said, that she had come in the hope of having her money returned. That was all the connexion he had had with the matter. Mr. Serjeant Adams said this statement was not exactly to the point, and it would be much more satisfactory if the learned gentleman would answer a few short questions ; Mr. Hurry's answers to these were that Flanagan was not his clerk. He did not know whether Flanagan received 10s. from Mrs. Denny. Not a fraction of the 10s. found its way to his pocket. He did not take the brief with a 10s. fee.—Mr. Serjeant Adams : Thee the whole affair, as far as you personally are concerned comes to this : You were asked to defend a person, and the reason you did not was that you were informed that the caw had been tried before 3—Mr. Horry: Exactly 80, your lordship.—Mr. Serjeant Adams: Then there let the matter drop ; but I think it right to say, as fares the bar is concerned, that Mr. Horry has satisfactorily explained the matter, and as to Mrs. Denny, she has been im posed upon by false pretences, and had her remedy, by either indicting Flanagan or suing him in a county court. The dignity of this court could not suffer it to b• made the medium for the adjustment of such dimputes u this.—Oregg, the usher of the court, here said that Flanagan had always sepresented himself, and was understood by every person at all connected with the court, to be Mr. Harry's clerk. He was in the habit of conveying the learned counsels' wig and gown to and from court, and always attended upon him as a subordinate.—Serjeant Adams said he could hear no more.—The matter then dropped. ARCHES COURT. TRU OFFICE OF THB J ODOR PIBOIIOTED ET FAIINELL •OLIEBT TUB REY. Mit. CHAIO, Herbert Jeaner Fust gaye judgment in this cause, which has been some time before the court, and of which the particu lars have been already duly reported in the columns of the Express. The learned judge entered into a lengthened analysis of the evidence which had been previously adduced,a great portion of which was not fit for publication. This occu pied nearly 6 horn, when Sir H. J. Fust concluded by giving the following judgment : " I do not think it satisfactory to my mind to say the cue is clearly established, but I do not say it is disproved. I cannot say there is no suspicion attached to it, or that the articles in this case are not proved. The rev. defendant's conduct to Charlotte Smith has been proved, and he might have behaved in the same manner to others. I think the parties have failed is proving those articles in respect to Ann Smith, to whom he is said to have conducted himself in a very improper manner. The ques tion is, how shall it be visited on Mr. Craig. If he had satisfied the court in reference to this cue the court would have decided that the parties bad failed to establish their articles ; but it appears he has con ducted himself in • very improper manner, and some punishment must be administered to him. It ap pears that during the period he has been in the parish, that it has gradually improved, yet he appears not to be the per son who should have the charge of such a parish, having conducted himself in the manner he has. The question is, what shall be the punishment; and then as to the matter of costs, how is that to Ise decided ? I think the party has proved enough to justify his coming into this court, without attaching to him any malicious feeling, and has clearly established one part of his case. I therefore think it is my duty to suspend the Rev. Mr. Craig from his duties for the space of two years. I think I shall also con demn him in part of the expenses of these proceedings; but I cannel say how much. The rev. defendant must be con demned in a fine of 2501., besides being suspended for two years. The articles 6, 6, 7, 8, and 9, are not proved." COURT OF EXCISE. Before Admiral the 11701. - B7:11. 7erc7,ll.7.7tephenaon, Part., and C. J. Decries, Esq. LEGAL OBJECTIONB.—L. Cowan, of No. 139, New Gravel lane, soap manufacturer, was charged with sending out of his premises scraps and parings of soap, and also pieces of soap not in bars or parts of ban, which pieces should have been returned to the boiling copper, and for which 10 per cent. is allowed in the charges for duty. The penalties were laid at 2001.—Mr. W. Haggonbor stated that he was a silk dyer, in the employ of Mr. Machu, of Twister's-alley, Bunhill-row. He remembered a quantity of soap being brought, on the 26th of April but, by Mr. Cowan's carmen. It was taken out in baskets and removed to the soap cellar, where it remained unmixed with any other until it was seized by the excise officers. When it was removed it was the same in appearance as when it came in. The soap re ceived from Mr. Cowan was not in bars, but in all kinds of shapez—Mr. Wauell, the foreman, said when the soap arrived a bill of parcels was handed to him by a person named Pope (since deceased), in Mr. Machu 's employ. He found a good deal of small, and observed that it was very different from what they had been in the habit of receiving, that being usually in ban, and this in very irre gular shapes. When it was seized by the excise officers it wu in the same shape and size as when it was received. After the seizure saw Mr. Cowan, and told him that the excise officers had reined the soap, and he replied that the article was perfectly legal, and that Mr. Machu had no right to suffer it to be seized, but afterwards, on a settlement of the bill, deducted the nine of the quantity seized. Mr. W. T. Gregory, super visor, said Mr. Cowan claimed the 10 per cent. allowed on scraps of mottled soap, on condition that he complied with the terms of the act of parliament. The soap should be cut into bars of 15 inches in length, and none other were legal. The soap on the table consisted of scraps and parings, and ought to have beea returned to the copper. Great refuse arises from mottled soap in consequence of the deposit of lees, and 10 per cent. was allowed by act of parliament to cover efts lowa so sustained. The pious of soap prodneed have n been ban or parts of bars—Mr. W. Sleeper, super visor, deposed to seizing the soap for the reasons given by the l ast witness. He told Mr. Cowan that he had seized soap at Mr. Macho's, and that it consisted of scrape and parings, and remarked the low price at which it had been sold (42s.per cwt.). Mr. Lewis, a solicitor, having cross-examined the witnesses on the part of the defendant, Dr. Bateman said that was the eau on the pert of the crown.—Mr. Lewis, before addressing the court for the defendant, took an objection, that as the solicitor for the crown had closed his case, and had not proved that the defendant had ever sold the soap at all to the person on whose premises it was seized, that no case whatever had been made out against the defendant, and that the information must be dismiseed.—The court was for . . some time in consultation, and ultimately gave their opi nion that a link in the chain of evidence was wanting, and that the objection taken by the learned gentleman for the defence was fatal to the information.—The information was thereupon dismissed. POSSUBING ILLICIT SPIIIITS.—John Smith, of No. I Bullock-alley, Whitecrose-street, St. Luke's, was charged with the possession of illicitly manufactured spirits, with in tent to defraud her Majesty of the duty.—Mr. F. Pargeter, excise :officer, stated, that on the 26th of July last he went to the above premises, having received information that illicit spirits were concealed there. He sounded the floors, but could discover no hiding place, and made a minute ex amination of the apartments but without effect. However, before leaving, be removed the tea kettle standing in the fireplace, and finding the back of the fireplace loose he re moved an iron elide, and there found a large recess, with a quantity of spirits in bladders concealed. The whole had been illegally distilled.—The landlord of the premises said he let the rooms to a man, who gave the name of J. Smith. They were formerly occupied Ny Mary CUT, who had been committed, and was aow in the House of Correction for • similar offence.—The court gave judgment in the penalty of 1001. SHER.II.I O S COURT. Before James Burebell,...Beq., anti Stephen John 11.4 To. (loam; V. Wnirwer.c. — . 6nowre COMMISSION. — This was a proceeding prosecuted by the Crown authorities on behalf or her Majesty's Cocarniutonems of Woods and Fo rests, land revenues, and works of building, to recover of the defendant, Henry Whitwell, the awn of 2871. 18s. 7d. The Commissioners of Woods and Forests entered into an agree ment with the defendant for the use of certain premises, &c., which the defendant held of Dr. Lushingten. At the tints the agreement was made, the commissioners paid half • year's rent in advance to the defendant, who at the same time was considerably in tartar to his landlord; and soon after the commissioners entered upon possession Dr. Lushington, the superior landlord, demanded of them the rent they had paid to Whitwell, and they bad to pay it over again. Therefore the present proceedings were to recover back from Whitwell the money they had paid over to him and the money the had paid to Dr. Lushington en his account. J.Bushell, Esq. the under-sheriff, briefly explained the nature of the proceeding to the jury. Upon the evidence adduced it was only necessary for them to find the defendant indebted to the Crown in the sum of 2871. 18s. 7d.—Verdict accordingly. PitOCLAMkTION OF OOTLAWRY.—At the Sheriffs Court yesterday, Mr. Hemp, the bailiff, called upon the following to surrender or to stand severally outlawed Rchd. Norman, Lord William Paget, Edward Kent Bayard, Stephen Tem. plo, Erie Charles Henry Burgess, and W. W. fileigh. WESTMINSTER COUNTY COURT. Before D. C. Moyton, Dm., Judge. FRIEND O. PlalOTr.—ti•ta7ltNO UP "CONCHILTS " in FURNISHED LODGINGS.—This action was to recover of the defendant, a clerk in the service of the Eastern Counties Railway Company, the sum of 111. 10s., for thirteen weeks' rent of furnished apartments at 30s. per week, from the 30th of July to the 25th of October.—Mr. Dod, on behalf of the pl►intiff, said that on the sth of May last the defendant took the apartments of the plaintiff, and entered into an agree ment to kei p them for twelve months certain, the rent to be paid weekly. On the Ist of July the defendant wished to get away from his agreement, and on the 2nd of that month a notice was served upon the plaintiff, to the effect that, if he did not discharge his servant, who had been impudent to Mrs. Parrott, he •hould leave on the 16th. The plaintiff de chned to do anything of the kind, ►nd called the defendant's attention to the agreement, which he was willing to cancel if Mr. Parrott paid the rent up to the 29th of September. This defendant refused, saying he could go "slick" through the agreement, and would create suck a disturbance in the house that Mr. Friend would be glad to get rid of him at any price, even to calling in the police ago turning hint out. The learned gentleman read several letters addreseed by the defendant to plaintiff of the most laughab:e nature. In them Mr. Parrott complained of the girl refusing to fetch him eggs for breakfast and being im pudent to Ddrs. Parrott, and of Mr. Friend representing himself to be a gentleman of the legal profession when he naiad him to be an actor. He eh/waned to Miro hit POLICE.- _ v ESTERDAT. BO W-STREET.—Git ammo - Barr, C. Brewer, and S. &Alpha, were finally examined, I charged with compiling to defraud Mr. S. Julius Carey, by foul play at cards—Mr. Ballantine was not at present pre pared with any further evidence. He proposed that the pri• loners should be committed for trial at once, but, if Imes- vary, should be brought up again in the mean time, as the sessions did not commence till the 22nd instant —Mr. Pren dergast submitted that there was not sufficient evidence to justify the committal of Brewer. The avideace of such a person so Le Ilia could only be accepted so far as it was corro borated. Now that put of Lewis's, evidence which affected Brewer was uncorroborated, and therefore, he submitted, in• admissible. Brewer was a gentleman of respectable con nexions, and his character would be much affected by the committal.—Mr. Henry said that the cue must go for trial. Mr. Prendergast's argument, if accepted, would render it necessary that every word of such a witness's evidence should be corroborated.—The prisoners were then committed for trial. SOUTH WARIL—SANITARS STATE OP Sr. GEORGE THE Maarya.—Mr. Fitch, a solicitor, accompanied by seve ral of the board of guardians of the parish of St. George the Martyr, applied for Mr. Cottingham's assistance in the com pulsory removal of the occupants of a number of dilapidated dwellings in Three Tons-court, White-street. Mr. Fitch mid that these dwellings were occupied by a great number of poor people, no less thea seventy-seven persons, male and female, living in fifteen rooms, which presented a mass of fifth and dirt of every description as mast engender con tagion and disease. Mr. Fitch then produced a certificate from two medical officers describing the condition of the houses, and the apprehension that disease must be fostered therein if means were not speedily adopted to prevent it. The object of the present application wasto solicit the magis trate's interference in compelling the removal of the whole of the occupants of these tenements. The landlord of the houses in question was so eircumetanced that he had no power over the inmates, who paid no rent, and that they peremptorily refused to quit. One of the guar dians said that the flooring and wood work of many of the houses were destroyed; he never beheld such a scene of filth and wretchedness ma they presented : the rooms miserable and destitute of furniture of any kind, and crowded with human beings. There were no privies, sad filth of the worst description lay scattered over the rooms; and amongst the number occupying fifteen rooms there weal only two flock beds—all the rest lying on the ground. Many of the apartments had no flooring at all, the inmates having torn it up for firewood. The stench proceeding from these habitations was dreadful. Fever prevailed here to a great extent in the summer, and several of the patients were ad. mitted into St. George's workhouse, but on recovery they went back to their old quarters. Mr. Cottingham, said, al though anxious to assist the gentlemen in the abatement set such a nuisance, which was calculated to be of such serious consequences, he did not conceive that the act authorised him to turn a number of poor persons out of dwellings which they had inhabited probably for a lengthened period that they could be proceeded against under the Small Tenements Act, and given the proper notice to quit at a um twin time, for he did not wish it to go forth that the poor creatures were all to be turned out at a moment's notion. He thought the landlord ought to exudee the power he peas seised, if he still had any interest in the premises, and get them out by legal process. Mr. Fitch said that the inmate' of these houses had no legal right to be there at all, as they paid no rent, and the rooms were all destitute of furniture, except two miserable beds : that the landlord, although de prived of power to act in the matter, was still most anxious for the expulsion of the people. If the magistrate permitted a policeman to accompany the pari..ll officers to the locality where the nuisance existed he had no doubt the inmates would retire from the houses ; but otherwise, if an attempt were made to expel them, they would cause a disturbance, for they had already shown signs of resistance. Mr. Cottingham said, that he would suggest that written notices should be stuck up in the immediate vicinity of the houses, warning the inmates to quit them on a certain day, and setting forth that if they did not comply with it the order would be enforced.—lfr. Fitch said, he believed that not one of the inmates could read writing, and that they would maga is ignorance of the nature of each maps.— .-A. It'. Mr. Cottinglum: Then the notice ought to betted to them, apprising them that if they did not give sr possession the law would be enforced against them.—Mr. Fitch said, that some of the inmates were labouring undfir sickness at pre sent, owing to the unhealthiness of the houses, and that the parochial authorities were prepared to admit them into the workhouse, and do everything in tholt power to alle viate the condition of the people. Ho then thallibed the ma gistrate, and retired with the gentlemen by whom helms ac companied. LAMBETH.—ALLIOZD ROBSIRT INT • CA811•W...- R. Gordon, a cab-driver, was charged with being con cerned with another person, not in custody, in robbing J. Wright of 41. 16s. The prosecutor deposed that on Sued") , night lut be met a person, named Knight, at a public-house in the Haymarket, and requested him to en gage a cub to take him home, he having drunk rather freely. Kid& did ma mid said he should see him home, and got into the cab with kin. On arriving at Vauxhall-gate he paid the prisoner his foe, and net at of the cab. Knight said he sheald go with him** his home in Booth lesiboth„ and just as he got to his own door, he (Knight) attack him a violent blow, which knocked him down, and while on the ground rifled his pocket of 41 16e. in gold and silver. Had no doubt the prisoner was a friend of Knight's, for when we left the cab he called to Knight, and said, " I shall wait for you, Jack."—W. Weston, 45 L, said he saw the prisoner with his cab at Vauxhall-gate for about 20 minutes, and ulti mately saw a man, who he had no doubt was Knight, get into the vehicle, who was driven away.—The prisoner, who denied all participation in the robbery, wan remanded. THAMES.—Misconnut-r or ♦Binnote.—Mr. Hodgson, a solicitor of Great Tower-street, came with R. Ford, to complain of an act of injustice committed by a broker at Stepney, and to seek redress. Ford was indebted to his landlord 61. 10s. for one quarter's rent due at Michaelmas last, and the broker complained of levied for the amount. Ford was unprepared with the money, and a man remained in possession until six days after the levy, when two of the lodgers, whose goods had also been wised, paid the rent and the expenses incurred. At the suggestion of the broker himself one 'billing was left unpaid. and on the same even ing the broker brought a van and stripped Mr. Ford's apart ments of everything he possessed. No inventory was Riven to Ford, nor would the broker give hint any information where the goods were,but threatened to dispose of them by auction. The only pretext for this proceeding was that a shilling was left unpaid. His application now wan for a summons against the broker under the Police Act, for him to show cause why he unlawfully detained the goods—Mr. Ballantine thought the aggrieved party had better sue the broker in the county court, where he would be more likely to recover compensation than in that court, because there were difficulties in the way of granting a numinous under the Police Act. MONEY MARKET. THURSDAY EVENING. As something of a rare occurrence for a consider able period we have had a remarkably quiet day in the funds. The intelligence by express of the French loan of ten millions having been taken by a list of subscribers, with the house of Rothschild at the head, made no impression on prices. Consols fluctuated all day only between 841 and I. For money and an- I count the quotations have been nearly the same, and were last called 841 to money, and 84 time. Further than the fact of the adjudication of the French loan at 75 francs 25 cents., the government minimum, nothing is precisely known yet as to the parties who are united in this great financial opera tion. But unless the combination be strong, and sup ported by the Bank of France as well, considerable difficulties may have to be encountered in carrying it to a successful conclusion in the face of money markets everywhere in a state of actual embarrass ment or distrust. The complexities of French finance, with an expenditure always enormously on the increase, and debt in consequence yearly ac cumulating, may perhaps begin to attract more attention in the legislature about to assemble than ' has been the case hitherto, and assuredly the exhibit and retrospect must be anything but satisfactory. It is strange, however, to see that, above all things, the leading members of the French chambers carefully eschew the treatment of really practical questions, whilst zealously engaged in the politics of the day and in political speculations. _ _ Reduced Threes were 83 to Three-and-a-Quar ter per Cents 84} to t. Bank Stock, 186/ to 81. India Stock, 229 to 232. Exchequer Bilis, 3s. dis count to par. Long Annuities, 8: to India Bonds, 235. to 20s. discount. . . . A bargain was done in the foreign house in French Five per Cent. Rentes at 115 francs 50 cents, at exchange 25 80, to-day. The occasional sales re cently of French stock may perhaps be intended as a feeler of the market, with a view to bring some of the new loan here. The experiment, however, in such case, will not afford much encouragement. Dutch Two-and-a-Half per Cents were still called 53 to 4 ; the Fours, 81i to 2). Spanish Fives, 154 to 161 ; the Threes, 26) to 74. Portuguese, 20 to 2. Mexican, 151 to Chilian, 86 to 8. Venezuela, 34 to 5. Russian were done at 105. The day has passed over without any declared failures, though not entirely without rumours, all however, unfounded. Another meeting of the cre ditors of Fry, Griffiths, and Co., was held to-day, but again adjourned, and it is conceived that the estate will have to be referred to the court of last resort for winding up. The extensive sugar refining house at Amsterdam, which was stated yesterday to have been assisted with 600,000 guilders on security of the private pro perty of the firm, is now known to have been sup ported by the Dutch government to the extent of one million and a-half of guilders. The stoppage of so ' large a concern it was felt would be a public calamity, which called for and justified the interference of the government to avert. The affairs of Messrs. Brodie, the Salisbury bankers, are likely to result more favourably for the creditors than was anticipated, as may be gathered front the following statement from that place, dated yesterday : Within the last few days, the clerks, "wiferices, and others inte nsified, have been busily engaged in the bank offices on the canal, making up the books and equating the amounts, preparatory to their bring forwarded to Mr. Bell, the official assignee in London. Reports speak more favourably of this concern, the general opinion now being that instead of but Is. is the pound coming to the creditora, there will be at least 10s., Mr. William Brodie having concern In several busi. news, which were not at first known to the body of creditors gene rally; he has a considerable share in two large mille, several and bakers' establishments, a large iron foundry, two stationery trades, large minting office, the mole proprietor of the cedestablished weekly paper known am the Salisbury .1 uurnal—it having been In ex istence more than a century, said by some to yield a clear profit of three thou and pounds per annum, and to have as great a number of advertisements and circulation as any other weekly journal in the Wert of England, if we except the Hampshire Adrertimm, published in Southampton. The stock, also, of the chops, as also the wine and spirit stores are said to be mach undervalued ; et Is now known that there are many persons who beaked with Marra Brodie. who have considerably overdrawn their 1100:14111tA, which are considered good debts. Mr. Brodie being known to be liberal in his advances to tradesmen in pecuniary difficulties, it is a well-known fact that nearly half the tradesincs in the City hare been in the habit of receiving tumour from that firm in their time of seed, and have to thank them for their present honourable position in society. All these (Avowable circumstances combined, will put • better feature on their affairs, and instead of many being entirely ruined, as at first ex- Vedied, creditors will receive much more than they at true hoped th t ts sald the brothers of the bankrupts will purcham the moots of both, so that the different trades may be carried on for their asrrppoe- rate benefits. Mr. Wm. and Mr. Chas. Brodie give every infnemadea and aaristanee, winding up their Wain. The nobility and gentry he Salisbury and around, with praiseworthy promptitude, have seat round to the tradesmen the amount of money doe to than, so that they should not be led into further difficulties for vein of reedy money. Viscount Folkstone, Sir Fred. Bathurst, C. B. Wall, Req., M.P., Col. Buckley, Sir E. Antrobus, and many others, have so acted. In reference to certain observations on Manchester banking,we have been favoured with communications from various correspondents in that locality more or less of confirmation and commendation. It should be understood, however, that the gist of the articles re-' ferred to, was not to cast odium or to show disrespect to the eminent firm of bankers who were necessarily brought forward prominently. The object was to combat the mistaken notion of a leading currency theorist of the day—a leading member of the bank in question also—that metallic money according to its • quantity was the measure of the credit to which a country was entitled, and that a note circulation was fraught with peril and panic. The example in point was the early history of his own bank, which was founded and carried on upon a system of bill promis sory values after date ; of bills paid in and discounted by bills; a system eminently successful, and which has elevated the bank to a position of capital and credit unsurpassed, if equalled, in modern times. _ ESOLISH FUNDS. Beak Ptock, 1871 8 ledla u Nuadx.il.ooo. 23 3 rl f- R."8"n " 8" "34 Do., eit7kt,PACorunt, 330 1 3 pur Ct. Cons Jteon.B4i 1i Commix for Acct., 64 I i i 4 New 31 per C O . Ara.. $4 4 4 Exchequer Milk £I,uPP. 2d. 3 di& Lone Arm., exp. Jaw. •S 1640.84 Per 7.101 Ditto 1,500, 2 pan. 2 die. luilla 8144, 22P3 32 Ditto Broo s l, 3 7 tut. FOREIO3 per Cee 4 t. Brialliaa New Boodle, 1643,7 6 per um. Qi , n Mr.. 96 3 por Carol. Do.* 6pee CI. Eqeseat Dew" If rz Mexico& Nor. 4 per CI. Fortunes Ma*. 214 1)1110, Amt., FUN DS. 5 per Ct. Rurasioa Mx, 10 22, g 81.105 3 per Ct. Nrealloth Hoods, =4 Ditto, Acct., Nov. 15, Di =I Per Ct. Venezuela Das, 3135 Ditto, Deferred, 10 5 Per Cl. Freuch Resifts, 11g. 50c 161. tft. 21 J. 06.6. &deb FAebsAte. 12 km 144141 EICHANONS AND friOCIA AIDOAD. Wa [ FARIS, Nev.* nti r , Ihe A 001.114. ------- g — r. 1 CIMAII. va rr 75 4 1 •T 377 16 6 Do. ..... 11 6 76 , 16 10 114 60 116 16 I 116 60 OS Do. ...... 74 SO , 76 64 17 OS 76 25 77 1 Da .... 100 I .. 19• 1 40071.1640.... 90 Mow. li Melo labial 103 26 Moony. Do. a DAL ... IN . Lou a . 972 Do. 3.. ...... . . limb Ip.a. Do. 14 . . IZZ . Kario .. 3976 ea Lace WOO. 26 792 Malmo. Noy. 6. 0t Ou, IS 014 66 60 days, 20 0.001 Tiro PS OgsSL. 114 Mir. Mimi; Pailirls, 5 ilik Si Mu; Uo II 00 . 1 Bank of St. Ferdinand, 1,1; Dank of Bt. habil* 112. 74- ohango on London. 14 TO Ilk. Bottom" Nov. s.—loan of 1840, p ; Ditto. 1842. 901 Ditto. D 541. ; Unto, 183 S, oit ie Loon of the City, 1/02, , Mu ° , bye. y,-, 9.=Exchonee oo Londor., 25 TS ; two month, 25 35. Nov. 4.—Austrian rive pot Conte., 104; Ditto. Your pa Cain, 91 ; Ditto, Throe per Cont.., 68 , Ditto, Two-and • 1911olf poi Nato, 524 ; Lou' ♦ of 1831, 16,4 ; Ditto, 101, RAILWAY NEWS. There was a fair market yesterday,though with out any !articular activity of business. Some Liverpool bankers are said to be free sellers of certain lines, held, of course, in deposit against advances heretofore made, and the shame thus brought to market have been one of the leading causes why railways have not partaken to a proportionate extent in the late improve. meat of public securities. nHaltE LlST.—Lomax, Nov. H. I.l2.—The gootsaans of New la Roam dune:en denote wiell dais: Uwe cilium In !Wits dim' pero. WS. led ; 13 1 1 14. IWi • 10 91 10aledeataa I Do. 1 &aro Cheater It Holyhead ll aoreoet Do. Ise CL,6per Do. tet CI., 0 per (3. Dblin& Dept Jane. 13d. DrnertalkthruetatLo /314n1151.1331 3 / 4 L313416 Do. 131. E . a H.) 11 Do. (31.105. E. et HI W. par Isetero Countlee , 161 16 1 DoExtn.s p1.1.N0 1 id. Do. Yore DoNorthn aNnotro49 I°.: "11* Fowler,* (follow . 0.1 Kest Lnoolnhlre II Do. Now.. . Do. Nnr, share 01d. Nast Linooluehire Id, Do. MAW '44 5 Do. t More* 4 Yd. Do. Aare. . 1 Edisto. & NortAero Do. Nese .... . Dr. Exeter, Yawl!, Dore. 11d. it,o& Ayr [lest oa. de Norther rankle:. n ll Do. L lid. Q OL 40 West Ire. eHt o. l 4 Do. :O f .10 99.390 Do. D'esr, 151. Great Western 9 a Do. tie Do. New, 171. Hodderedeld, Mane. Do., do.. Tairde. . 5199 ar !hal and Stay 99 Do. 1 aurae De. shares . /or., . Eds Ode 974. Do do. & Norwich 9 Td. DoErtSe.( laerC&E 11 ld. ,Lowe. & Ip. Do. Mir& Lemendsire & rorksh' A bfrelll ; Amberg &Not. &801 1 Dudley: & S. Vtakyl kiln. k (Ilford J.n Hao.on.ran.,4 Bina Ilirtstol and Kzetar Do. Thirds D0. 11 .W.C1 6 . 1 ..t New. tel DO. zr.t N. "P. D0.1 0 4,,b.,111.3t. p ii i 4 D0.14.4.4..M A- 11 631 D0.101.5h.. AI d. II r. 3, k . Imbdon 48. Western:l3 Do. New Co.. Wits' i Do. N. 40t. , , 3, Do. Cons. Tent As. Id. Ip. Do. do. Tenths :24. ISO . Thlrb 41 P.:1;a 6 ' 14 ..4, 4 'n. ! Ioid• ii,Mon. boxt. Illat l 4 F . =44Sousthompl: j 10 Do. 40t. limo ... 1 1 44 , a ) 10 Do. SOL ahem 46 100 Do. Dino. a Di,,t; i . a 3 10V, Do.C.llrf.&Dr.fe.enT 3 14 Do. Itrtsl.ll:loster /10 .11lid.Gt. West. ( 1 Asti 100 Nnecustk & lisrfie I.34.Newessorket Mute liie tiiNoktl : l i llgi nsn ah ::: „: 234 1' Do. istensio4 . . H. I Do. reud. ...... :I PA ' Norfoili ..... .. .. .: . IQ 0 6 Do. New, td. . . .3 6 lo.tiourtit.6ip GI Id. ow 13 Do. Extension . 3 1,& 3 Do.Selo47.VolNoe f 5d.... 2 Do. do.lrovio.j. V. 1, Ili 4 N. etnentill OM, .i 0 1North ataffotdablre .117 i Nora more... . . North Irreern...... : . 1 _ 31 . ijii. — .ViWzos ....ii401r.191 10 71 Iteada..t/told. it It4j. 611 11 llowton and flitches. td. ow SO &offish enet j .rul I, 21j: 111 Scottish Mid la n d j 10 Do. 'lfni, .. ... .. 1 a saor., J(6IA. dr 11.6. i 6 lArears.l . Birrn. 0.4'3 31. 3 Do. du. (116 B. .... ja. 4 Shroimblro trolou 11 10 Saudi Arun......... 17a. 4 iSottlA StaltordsAirral lit 3300outhKaatorukDovr. 3 10 Do. du No. 111 18 Do. do. ...... .... 3 o 6d. I 6 Do. do.. ...... iji s 1 16 South Walai.. .1.5 4 4 1 1 a or4B.Don.i . dir.: 4 Tar V6e Krtetulah 3124 111 T6asses Itarerl. lidqi 101 1014. 131 Waterford 61::1611. - 11 Illitehor.d. fern), Wittsdium,kll',66. 1414 d. 41 Win.. SUc4S.ll6m. l York. Nom. St liar. 311 3TI 15 Do.orlz. N racklier 4411 16 DediShisidoPorcA., 10 Do Ez.NolYk&N*l2l U 10 DodoNo2Naci lk 'qui 1 O WON ElNvor Pre S/ j i 10 Tark6North3ll.llan.,7l 10 Do. Preforooo. ~ 1 54 j 30 110.LAW.111.18.1i115 llf I Fossloll Lammas. .lioulupte a Ilsalme . 1111 jt,ell.of Pr.10r.4 Pew 1 Sp. 8 Demerara 1 Da,..h HAratia 6ld. ii.E.a baba.. 8 !Loomis ea ba Saiiii e,t, 4I L .... .Iss 6 4 0.1 , A , -iiro teo . .Uti.3l 14.11 r sad Lkpe j HIV Dd. 10 Northorn of Yrzaos . 12 1 , 1 8 Orkanz 6 Etordcauzi4 j 10 ;Park and Lyon, 10 'Paris and Orleans 111 Paris mut !lowa 8 Pans 6 Strath.:wry. 31 II Boa. sad ILano 1 14 Sam hro sad Moan O Toles and 16witer 8 Wog Manias _gar Yamat. - - 'AXIS, NO. 16. ie., PM . oirm: iiiiimr. 1.5.66. ; 01=1 Park and Orisr 19M MitYSTO . W Paris sad Ramo 996 91T so sex 60 916 936 Sloven aim Hans,— 520 693 020 15 * Avlgaus a liaasoWes 7, 540 667 10 640 568 ftsabowl and ibile 165 1 165 tre Cen IVlasos) aso sii ao 660 6 07 al Ilordeau.9 461 496 497 60 490 on 58 North ..... ... . ... Vim*. Nov. 4.—if orthern. 148; 0141orat00. 108. V• 6104 1166„ NW 11l ; 1 , 91061611. 01,; P 663005 ; Mew.. ON ; Apennine, 615. COMMERCIAL AND MARKETS. PRODUCB.—MINCINO-LANI, Nov. 11. The roger market fully maintains the advance quoted yesterday, and a very full amount °Chamblee* has been done : 030 badc. West India sold by private contract; 1,000 hhda. and 300 barrels Porto NOD (foreign) also bond burrs; the portion bought for home consumption showed a slight advance, lade the quality for exportation and regains in toad brought previous rates. Refined sontinues rather Kam., and prices are a shade dearer ; lump., 52a. to 56.4.—Coffee : There has not been a public sale, but it so reported 33e. has been offered for • terse parcel of native good ordinary Ceylon.—Trimdad cocoa declined la. to 2s. in public role; ordinary to good sold at 39e. fsl. to 41s. 'id.—Rum has been in fair demur!, proof inwards la. Pd. to Is. 9d.--Cottoo inactre.—Tallew remains at, 43a.—Tea: The sales concluded today prime the came ea yesterday; 3,400 packages passed auction, Ito of which found buyers; the result of the vales towing a larger portion than usual sold.—ln other articles no alteration, but confidence appears to he increasing. COTTON.—LirEarooL, Nov. 11.—There was • steady market today, and the sales were 4,000 boles, 300 of which were for export. MANCHESTER, NOV. 11.—There wax a better feeling on 'Change this morning, and, hi= = g improvement may b noted in our trade generally, ounriderable orders ooming forward to execute them more freely ; but atlll the high ram of money operates as • severe rambles, m all tranaactioas. For yarns more favourable terms were obtainable, and to-day, an on lfuerviay, spinners were known to go away with considerable orders; on cloths, however, no advance la °Whale, and the incaution: are more limited. SHIPPING INTBLLIGENCE.—MAus. DO2. 100. DON. 'AIR. Dot AIM. DIII. 3 Dublin 01 Holland .... 010 India, e. Soutb. 0 Sydrity.lll3ll 2 Waterford .. Flanders.... 0 aropton_.. u 0 Mexico sad 1 Domande.. 011 Franm. , 0 0 Do. Mantelllee 0 Itararm.Dea. t 0 auernAJen. co Lisbon-N0v.15 . 0 Boon sad 0 West 0 Hambunt.... Modtterran.. 0 , llottfam.Nov.lB 0 Man ..Dos 31 GRAVLSE,D, Nov. 11.—Arrned : Earl of Ri%Leylon ; Ant werpen, Antwerp; Giraffe, City of Rotterdam, , Rotterdam; City of Boulogne, Boulogne; Belfast, Calais; R. kin, Ghent; V'enerate's, Havre; Mune, Hamburg; Isabella, Cronstatit; Memel; Vicar of Bray, SL Bias; Stebon Heath, Marini& ; Santa de Jadoa, Denia ; Atlantic, Haldane; Friends, Quebec; lodustris, • Finland; Exlmoaatose Caleutta ; Mayflower, Almeria; Merest Centric; John Cunni ngham, Palermo ; Mutual, Quebec ; Stewart, Kumanon, China; Pete, Bine* ; Primula, Cuts; Son refits, Bombay; Independence New York; La Papita, Blitwo; Quebee.—Sailed Cardiac, Bristol queen, Madera, Hartlel ; Rajaathan, Bombay ; Symmetry, Ceylon ; Thetis, Beat boy; Rockall, Coronation. New Orleans; Torch, Alpha, Osprey, Azores; SL James, New York ; Isabel, Open; Harlequin, Boulogre; Tourist, Cell.; Bobo, Antwerp; Columbine, lion ; Concordia Hamburg. LITERPOOL, Nov. 11.—The Queen Victoria (t) foe Dublin bas pat back with damage, baring been in ectaUset with the Isaac Allerlon— no lives lost. Patrice, for St. Lucia, has put back. The snooper Brothock, front Limerick to London, was Win in with Bth iwt Mr the math and eastward of Cork, very leaky, by the Fatima, from cotta, which lay by her all night, but the following morning, the wee thee being Roe, the schemer bore op for the F.nglish chasm& —Arrived Mans, Cadis ; Cambridge, Sea, New York ; Datualsm. Maranharn; Blarney(a.),Havre.—Put lark: En, Leghorn; Hercules, Bangor ; Lowing, Hamburg. Off Toothale-noi, Stephen Whitney. [Advertisement.] A never-failing Remedy for Dewey are Holloway's Villa—Mr. Wellington Leake, chemist of St. Vincent's, who has wild an Immense quantity of Holloway's Pills, airlines from his own knowledge of a meet estraordinary curt of dropsy that has been effected upon a person raiding in that island he their use; the patient was so dreadfully emitted, that though he obtained the beet medical aid of the place, yet he derived no breekt • notho.g fecund to reach the mu of his oompLant until he took these celebrated pills, which no effectually eradicated It from his system that he is 11011 as well as ever he was in ha life. Sold by ali= =and at Professor Holloway's Eembilauerat, 244, o iragygt—Noe. 7, at Narhargh Vicarage, Norfolk, lb! WO of the Res. J.F. Vane. of • daughter. YHA Neld.—N ov. 7 at PA Panama Torriartat, the Who( Ilia Rev. J. Frauds, a daughter. HAM ILTO3l.—Nev. 8, at Meath, the wilco( the Res. R. Y. D. flarnlitou. of a sou. IREOOR.—Nov. 3, at the Mane of Klimulr, Isle of Skye, the wife ths Mes. A. WOragor, of aeon. MACLACHLAN.—Nos. 7, at the Royal Hospital, Cho'aca, the wife of Dr. Maelaelitan, of a daughlar. RO MIS:CH.—Nor. 7, at ha midmost, In Marlon square, the Baronets de 160 i-bock, of a sou. UPTON.—Nor. 7, at Moreton Bay, the wife of the Bor. R. Upton. of a 10 Do. i shares ... 15 /pr.. .0. &fade- 9 7 • 16 Do. J o. & Norwich 9 7d. 0 DoErfSe.autredoEls Id. ISO Laws. & Carlisk. 10 Do. Thirds d. 10. 93 Lancashire & Thrash, 9 Do. C 3 11 Do. share s s Do. De. Suiten! ... „Id. pu li. Do. Thirds( Revd., 74d. 54 Do.Liorryl.d. Thi 33 DoNieddirtfeXK ry il 44 Do Il'k/Palte l Q o k 22. Do. W. K. Colon 2/ Id. 26 Do. Prrsion ih. Wire 135 0 DI. i Mara ... .A 2f 30. If Do. do . B r ad f ord !Ty. 0 Gado mad lik,Letessier e 5 6 1 1 21 Loads mid Mak 1 19 17 Do. Nets. d4 Darre f.l44r . r.;WS I IL 37 Lad., &or., 40m4 Lie.. Mom. &N.J O Lio..Crosbost &Wk a 169 London é iliaeltee,slll4l 3l 6 Do. do.. ..... No. 1!1 I 34 D. do.. . No. 2 2 I 8. 50 Lon.. Brigham, 0014 1 30 Do. Cum. Bigh4liel4 9 D0.d0.1inar.6.9.04. 50 D.'s/C.10.R 12 P. llLohdon and Grooms. 181, Do. Preference. IX , London ON-000m 4917 MARRIAgES. COLEJ3—PAIOD—Nov. 4.arlc,;;,uhLii, by the Rev. J. JAZIMP. the j. W. Coto, to Mary Ann Beaty. only daughWr of the late U. 800 Beat otone, Alllngton. Ortife 1 WI.2.IISSELL. —Nov. 10. at All Souls. Lanrimm.place, the Lord Minium of Run:heeler, Sir W. P. (fallacy, Bart., to Crag Aim, daughter of Sir It. F. Russell, Bart., of Thirkieby.park sad Chequern.cmut. NORM A —WI)ODLY.—At Taunton, by the Rev. Dr. Cottle, J. R. Norman. EM., Lieut.. R.N., elde4 nun of the Rev. J. 11. Norman. of Deal. to Sophia Cecilia, third daughter of the late Rey. O. Woodl.l. incumbent of Martindale. PATERSON —IIERFORD.—Nov. 5, et Uptotton.Scvcro, by the Roc 11. J. Tayler, A. H. Paterson, tip., mouton, of Saadllngcute, Derbl rhire, non of the Rey. A. Patemon, M.A., of eitourbritMe. to Mare Chance. wend daughter of J. Herfurd, Rao., of lbo k. 111 1 ,. Dint Upton ouSercen. Pitt N 0 LK —HUN TER.—Nov.4, at Oknochar, A. Pringle. Em., M.D., of Law, to Janet Lunn, youngest daughter of It. Hunter, I.q. DEATHS. DURN.—Nov. 9, at Brixton-rise. Surrey, 11. Burn, Dq., chairman of the city lands committee, fur 15 yearn one of the repnventatives the common council for the ward uf larringdon without. aged en... DE MOLEY NS.—Nov. 5, at Farrinreihnond, Kerry, Chan, R. T. Du Holey.% Hs, J.P. FAO A Y.—Nov. 5, at Pau, Marla , widow of 3fajor.flev. C. /ages. 11.E.1.C.5., and IBOCklUtt daughter of the Ker. C. Gibboa. N.B. 11SXTER.—Nov. 8, M Cholteeharn, riett<T, RR of rtml.,_ college, and for many yarn a detaity lieut. awl magistrate for 0 . county of Bucks, aged ie. HENN EDY.—Aug. 21, at Cape Town, wife of A. Kennedy. Coq.. of Deep River Farm, (leery Dintrict. BAN DEMA N.—Sept. 18, at Neemuch, Anne, youngest child of MOM R. T. !Wideman, commanding 33d Rey. Bengal Native Infantry. STU ART.—N or. 5, at Crurnarty. the Rev. Mr. Stuart, rundieer or Dee St. George's Church, Edinburgh. W ALK KR.—Nov. 9, at ilreenwtch, the Rev. J. F. Walker. A.M.. chaplain to the Right Hon. Corporation of the Triiiity.hunac, and Ms tura. of Paula. Deptford. Kant, aged Y. W KAY. —Nor. 4, st Dublin, the Rev. Dr. Wray, Viec.Prorret d al moil ratio owl& of lc Wsukao• Lam. J 0.... of No. S. Cal Of tomiloo. Prams. st Ike 0111.04 Mem 61s Letabrimi la Ike moon.l W wag 011 allikelirriaaaaleTuiais II J. A F