The Express. — London, England, 1863-07-22 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS.—TorsDAL JULY 21. The Law Cater CS took Ws mot oo the woolack at iv. o'clock. BRRACH OF PRIVILEGE. The Earl of DONOUGHMORE celled attention to an article in the Stockton end Hartlepool Merrar!, of the 15th July, in which it was imputed to him that having bad a re lative—the Rev. Henry Crispin—interested in the Went Hartlepool Dock and Railway Bill, he bad corruptly m a d e nee of his position its a member of that house and chairman at the committee to obtain for his relative more favourable terms than he would otherwise have obtained. He indig nantly repudiated the ineinuation, and asked if there had been Loyally( in his conduct during the twelve years he bad been in the 1104190 to warrant such • charge. As he thought their lordships would feel inclined to protect those to whom they eetrusted important functions in reference to the conaideretion of private bills, be bad felt ft his duty to call the attention of the house to the matter. Earl 1;1; taN VILLE thought their lordships would agree with bim that the charge was altogether unwarranted, and that the part taken by the noble earl in the case of this bill was highly creditable to bbn. The noble earl had detected very great irregularities in the proceedings of the coo levy, and had very properly brought them under the 'taxation of the house. It was a matter for grave conside rati,,n whether charges of this sort, involving a breach of the privileges of the house, should be pasesd over, and it would be for the house to consider wheth er it was not their duty to summon the reinter of the article to appear at the bar. As however, it was perfectly impontible t ha t any one could attach the slightest importance to the charge which had been made, perhaps the noble earl would be satisfied with having called the attention of the house to the matter. Lord REICIESDALE also vindicated Lord Dononsibmore from the accusation which woo made spinet him. The Earl of DONOUORMORE said he bad felt it his duty to bring the subject under the consideration of the louse, and having done so, be had no desire to press it further. Lord REDESDALE thought the editor of the paper IE4 to be thankful to the noble earl for his forbearance. The abject then dropped. The following bills were read a thirnime and paned : New Milford Dodo Bill ; Hadlow Railway BW ; Edin bargh and Olugow Railway Bill ; Bonelli's Electric Tele. ce . C s o er mpuny ; North Eastern Railway (Hull and Branch) Bill ; and Scottish Central Railway and Dundee and Perth and Aberdeen Railway Janeiro Com panies Bill. NAVY PRIZE AGENTS BILL After a shod dismal)a this bill weed through commit Ilse with smeedmeats. ALKALI WORKS AMENDMENT BILL. The Earl of DERBY moved to omit the clause, which provided that the recovery of penalties wu to be in the first Mitten against the owner, and that the owner might recover them over from a servant acting without orders; sad that in the event of the owner having made reguletioas complying in all respects with the terms of the act, the pushy shuld be recoverable not spied him, but against his sonnets who infringed those regulations. Lord STANLEY of ALDERLEY said that the clause was similar so the which existed in the Factory Acts. Lord CHELMSFORD thought that the clause was in contraveation of an established principle of the common law. Their lordships then divided : Contents 47 Noa.oonteets 24-23 So the amendment was rejected. The other alteratioes were agreed to. FISHERIES (IRELAND) BILL. The above bill was reporiod with amendment& PIER AND HARBOUR ORDERS CONFIRMATION BILL. This ball was read a third time. MISAPPROPRIATION BY SERVANTS BILL. This bill was aloe read a third time. VAOCINATION (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill was reported with arneedmenta. The UM= Relief Aid Acts Contionanee, Company Clauses, Turnpike Trysts Arrangements', and Exhibition Yodels Bills, were severally reed a third time. ROYAL COMMISSION. The House of Commons was then summoned to the bar to hear the royal assent given by commission to a number of bills. The lords Coonnimioners were—the Lord Chan. cellor, the Duke of Argyll, and Earl of St. Germans. The following is a list of the bills which received the royal assent :—Pocr-law Board Continuance ; Loan Societies Acts Amendment ; Regimental Debra, Re. ; Po/ice and Improve ment Scotlaad (Provisional order); Growing Crops Seizure Ireland ; Volunteers; Way wardens' Contracts ,• Prisons eland ; Greeswieh Hospital (Provision for Widows) ; Metropolitan Maim Drainage Eztession ; Officers of Royal Naval ; Public Works (Manufacturing Dis tricts) ; Land Drainage (Provisional Orders) : Sir' Robert Hitchanes Charity ; •Ruthin Charities ; Local Government o* l9 . 2 1 1 1 ,1 M• l7 !Politazt Railway W ; Oarme and Cardigan Galway Pater ; Millard Haves Dock and Railway ; Great North of Soaked Railway ; Levertoft Water, Gas, and Market; Bradford, Wakefiald, and Leeds Railway; Bristol and North Somerset ,• Birmingham and Sutton Cold geld Extension Railway Hsstinp Harbour ; Wex ford Free Bridge ; L o ndon and North Western (sew branch lines); Edinburgh Water ; Colo* Ve iny sod Halatend Railway ; Banff, Re., Railway ; Dare Valley Railway ; Hamme rsm ith an d City Railway ; 'Uxbridge and Rickmansworth Railway ; Banff, Be. (Extee am) Hallway Nutley. Thorpe, and Walton Railway; Bala sod Dolgidley Railway ; Friestot Reclamation ; Madras Irriptios and Canal Company; Midland Railway (Bristol line) ; Midland Railway (new k• 1; Newhaven Harbour, kin. ; Wor cester, Dean Forest, sad Monmouth Railway ; Formartine and Buchan Railway ; Great Eastern Railway ktd4itiond yaw.sts) • Great Northern (Spalding to March) uWm. Brighton, sod South Coast (s e w line at =7, lee.); Lynn and Suttonbridge Railway (Wansbech , &a); Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction; Thames Bridged ; Bak Valley Railway ; an d G rea t Western, West Midland, and South Wales Railway Com panies Amalgamation, Bills. Their lordships adjourned at a quarter past eight o'olect. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—TIMSDAY, Jri.ir 21. The house resumed at six o'clock. NEW ZEALAND. Mr. FORSTER gave nouns for Thnreda y to uk whether tu. Goverooe of New Zealand had ietienated his intention of wending to the Goveroor•Genend of India for Sikh troops to min in quelling the insurrection in New Zealand. TELEGRAPH BILL Kr. Y. GIBSON brought up the mesons of the Commons °° disagreeing with the Lords' amendments' to the Tele- IPIPIt NIL TILE LATE REVIEW AT ALDERSHOT. Colonel STUART asked the Under Secretary for War how many men were sent to hospital, and whether two men died io consequence of too long exposure to the beat on the oorasios of the recent review at Aldershot ; also, whether it was intended to provide in the huts at Alder shot one room for each soldier married with leave, more than one family being now lodged in one room. The Mai qui. of HARTINGTON said that there bad been great exaggerations respecting the easaalties at the recent review. One men had dropped dead, but be bad valvular disease of the heart, and died oo the march to the parade =in the morning. No donbt,however, the excersive heat used some suffering to the men. In answer to his gallant friend's second question, there was no case of more than one married soldier's family being quartered in one room. At the same time he admitted that better socom modatiou would be desirable. ME lONIAN ISLANDS. Lord J. MANNERS ioquired of the First Lord of the Treasury whether instructions had been seat to oar naval authoritiel off the coast of Greece to mime protection to the lonian subjects of her Majesty ; and whether, as the Bth Article of the Treaty of P.m., November 5, 1813, invites the accession of the Ottoman Porto to that conventioe, se well sa that of the powers which signed the treaties of May 30, 1814, andof June 9, 1815, it was the intent ino of her Ma )7.2..: government to invite the Porte to attend the con about to be held on the proposed cession of the lootati Islands to Greece Lord PALMERSTON—With regard to the first questios, no instructioes of the nature mentioned by the noble lord have been sent to the naval or military authorities or diplo asatie agent. of her Majesty, and for this plain and obvious reason, that no change has taken place in the Menai of the lonian Islands to the crown of Great Britain—they are still wider the protectorate of England; and, therefore, there ean be no reason why, io anticipation of an event which has sot yet happened, that protection to which the lonian Islands are entitled should be withdrawn trim them. With regard to his mooed question, the noble lord is partly right and partly misinformed. It is true that, by the treaty between England, ?mote. and Austria, it was stipulated that the accession of Turkey and of the two Sicilia should be invited. Bet though Turkey was named in the invita tion at that time, the Sultan, for views of his own, was dis inclined to connect himself with any European transactions, and declined to be as acceding party. There was a onovation two years afterwards, but it had a different object in view. A negotiation had been going on with regard to the protection of Pugs, which h a d for nierly belinged to the lonian State, but the English govern ment then agreed to renounce all claim to it, sad ack cow ledged it to be part of the Turkish territory. In return for that the Sultan did not accede to the treaty by which the lonian Islas& were placed under the protectorate c 4 Greet Brdaies,, bet acknowledged those seven islands sa a British and copied to treat the lonians with all the privileges of Brink eubjecr. It wee not a treaty *mane mg the protectorate of the lonian Island s under Great Britain, but acknowledging it se an established fad, sod deducing from that fact the concessions which were due to the lonian subjects. Consequently Turkey is not entitled se an acceding party to the treaty to be a party to any ensfereues for the wieder of the loans lauds to Greece Lord J. MANNERS—Is the noble lord aware that W treaty to Waal Milos referred ie actually headed the Ain of ACOSIIOIO4I to the Treaty of 1815 Mom. TEE 14APRESS, WEDNESDAY EVENING, JULY 22, 1863. Lord PALMERSTON—I have had occasion to look over it with some care, and I think the noble lord will fled it such as I have described. Mr B. ZbeflßZNE—Perhaps the noble lord can tell us whether the events which have recently occurred at Athena are likely to lead to delay is the arrival of the King. (A laugh.) Lord PALkIEBBTON—The King must determine for himself when he will go. (Laughter.) But if lam asked whether I see any mama in what has happened for delay, I say I see none certainly. (Hear, hear.) THE IRISH INDUSTRIAL MUSEUM. In reply to Mr. GREGORY, Sir R. PEEL stated, that in cooseqnence of what ap peered to be the general feeling of Irish members, the amalgemetion of the Irish lodustrial Museum with the Royal Dublin Society would not be carried into effect before the next union. But although nothing had at preaent been done with regard to the amalgamatioo, the matter wee not abandoned, but would be further considered. hall. He submitted this case in the full conviction that Mr. Herrick* would be deemed entitled to some compensa tion at the hands of her Majesty. government. Sir G. GREY said that the property VAS pro ' Wily disposed of below its real value, and certainly below Mr. Bewicke's estimate, and what was now sought for was the differeoce between that estimate and the amount which the property actually real Led. This was not a one in which the law was in fault, but one of those cams of the failure of justice arising from the unsatis factory nature of human evidence which must sometimes occur. Still it mart be remembered that Mr. Bewicke's sufferings were brought about to a great extent by his own conduct, by his acting in a way in which scarcely another person would have acted under similar circumstances. Sir F. KELLY said the statement of his hon. friend had been met with • degree of coolness which might be very becoming in the administration of justice, but which wee somewhat out of place when a claim wee made for compensa tion for injuries of this nature. (Hem.) It was impossible to listen to the details of this case without feeling that there wee some grievous defect in the law, and if the law could not be amended to meet each par ticular case as it occurred, the all was imperative for the immediate mer ciful and liberal oonsiderntion of the government. — The iOLICITOR-GENERAL thoOght they should not be led away too much by their feeling, in cases of particular hardship so as to forget that at the bottom of these cases was a question of general law. The claims of Mr. &wicks had been stated in a very pathetic manner by the bon. gen ! tleman, and it was undeniable that great hardship had been suffered ; but it was no greater hardship than any gentleman who was the subject of a criminal prosecution boos fide entered upon as far as the officers of the law were concerned, was liable to, from the actual state of the law. There were two important questions involved in inch cases as these—first, whether a court of criminal appeal could be constituted which should deal with such owes— but even an appeal would not have met this case, because it was admitted t ha t the evidence was sufficient, and the ver dict right, and, secondly, when and in what manner com pensation shou ld be granted. The greatest authorities bad felt that there would be very great difficulties in establishing a satisfactory criminal appeal, though he hoped those dif . cultism would not be found to be altogether insuperable. With regard to the question of compensation, if the principle of compensating in every case of this kind was to be adopted, it was a matter for consideration what charge it would in volve upon the public revenue, and how that chargelwas to be met. A gentleman had no more right than the poorest person to redress, and the number of cases where this sort of thing occurred was greeter than was commonly supposed. The house divided : _ _ Ayes 2O Noes 22-2 So the mottos was lash This result was received with ironical cheers. _ _ JAPAN. Mr. COCHRANE called attention to oar present relations with Japan. As it appeared we were on the eve of • war be thought the house was bound to all for information on the subject. He reviewed the chief incidents of our inter course with the Japanese, from which he drew the conclu sion that they had been subjected to compulsion and, in the exchange of money, to extortion, and he reed copious extracts from the papers laid before the house to show that we were not justified in the premise put upon the Japanese government. He urged upon the house the duty of mar tieing precisely the grounds of the war upon which we were entering, and be concluded by moving for certain P lh rs. e motion waa seconded by Mr. LIDDELL, who con. tended that the treaty obtained from the Japanese bad been extorted by fear, that it was ill-considered and hastily drown, and that by the law of Japan it was not binding upon the great territorial barons. Mr. LAYARD, in replying to Mr. Cochrane, said he lamented as much as anyone that we were forced to make demands upon Japan, but in doing so the government were only performing an absolute duty. He justified the treaty, and insisted that the Tycoon had authority to conclude a treaty with us. The outrages committed by the Japanese, he observed, were not against Englishmen only, hot against Russians and Americans. We bad been extremely mode rate in our demands, but we were bound to ask for repent tioo. He trusted that we should not be forced to go to war, and that our demands would be acceded to. The Prince of Satsuma, the peat offender, he believed, was accessible, and could be made responsible for his acts. He objected to give the papers. The maim was withdrawn. POLICE CHARGES AT PETTY EMMONS. Mr. W HAT LEY moved for • --- raiTriaof all oTaWrieiorpe made by the police before magistrateeLisztty seenr iimiwit ne or at police courts which on the heanng bees to e -ether with the amount paid by the persona so charged for Date, from the 314 day of December, 1862, to the 30th da y of June, 1863. A:.;; ;few obeervstions from Sr G;Glinr, the motion, in en eme►ded form, wee agreed to. DISSENTING CHAPELS, &c. ➢gr. NEWDEGATE moved an address "for return from the chief constable, superintendent, or officer in command of the polios in each county, city, borough, town, or die. trict of Great Britain, showing each chapel or place of worship, other than those of the established church ; and further, each monastery, station, convent, or religions house, which has been used or inhabited during the year ending August, 1863, within the district of such officer, stating the county and parish in which such chapel or house is situate, the denomination, sect, order, or religion of those by whom each chapel or house has been used or inhabited, and the name by which such chapel or house is known." Sir G. GREY said he thought the less the police had to do with any discrimination between the variona religious establishments of the country the better. (Hear, hear.) It would be highly impolitic and inexpedient to impose nine the police any such ditty. At the same time ha thought if the hoe. gentleman were to vary the terms of his motion so as to make it extend only to the information already in the possession of the Registrar-General, then would be objection to the motion. Mr. NEWISEGATE amid he would not pnee the motion. The motion was then withdrawn. CAPE OF GOOD ROPE CONTRACT. Mr. PEEL moved that the militant for the conveyance of the Cape of Good Rope mails with the Union Steam Ship Company be approved. After a few words from the CHANCILLOR of the KICHI QUIIt, the resolution wee agreed to. THE GALWAY CONTP.ACT. On the resolution for the above coistraet, Mr. PEEL stated, in answer to Mr. Dilino. that Galway warn to be the port of departure for the mails, and not merely. port of Resolution agreed to. .. _ lab intringtect. EQUITY COURT.—JuLT 21. (Before the Mute a/ the Ral/s.) THOMPSON O. DO WWI. The late baronet, Sir G. Bowyer, mortgaged certain of his estates in 1814 to Mews. Hoare., the bankers, and subse quently granted an annuity charged on the same estates to periwig wider whom the present plaintiffs claimed. In 1816 Menem Hoarse took poseassion, which they retalued till 1839, when the present baronet paid off their charge and took an sisigument of the mortgage. The annuity bad not been paid for many years, sod the plaintiffs applied to Sir G. Bowyer fee anaccountof the rent■. profile, ke., which was refused, on the grouod, in substance, that the plaintiffs bad no title to the annuity claimed. They now Sled this bill, relying on a letter written to them by the defendant to take the case out of the statute of limitations. Mr. Southgate, Q.C., and Mr. Stock were for the plaintiffs; the Solicitor-General and Mr. Wickens were for the defendant, but were not called upon ; and Yr. Selwyn, Q.C., and Mr. Ware for other parties. His Honour held that the letter in question did not take the cam out of the statute, and that the bill must therefore be dismissed. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORFOLK CIRCIIIT.—BiwroRD, Joey 20. The coramissioe was opened here on Saturday by Mr. Justice Wightnian. Mr. Justice Wightman sat in the Crown Court. Edacard Turrey alias Edmund Carpenter, a blacksmith, surrendered to his bail, charged with feloniously marrying Ann Harris, his wife, Harriet Turner, being then alive. Mr. Hillam Mills appeared for the prosecution ; Mr. Abdy defended the prisoner. It is seldom a case of bigamy pommels any point of in tenet to make it worthy of notice, bet here an unusual feature appeared. The prisoner was the illegitimate lon of • man named Torrey, but was baptised and commonly known by the name of Carpenter, his mother's name. In 1858 he was married to his first wife, who soon left him ; and it seems that he told the parson whom be married last that he was half drunk when he married, that it was a lark, and that be was married in his wrong name and the banns were put up in a wrong name, end the woman knew it. Mr. Abdy, on these facts, contended the marciage was not valid, the Marriage Act requiring • true description of the name, Ac., to be published by banns. His lordship mid, if the jury were of opinion both parties were aware of the miadeacription, it would be so. The jury at once Acquitted the prisoner. Nal PRICES 00M.—Before the Lord Chief Baron. MASON C. PEARNAN. Mr. D. D. Keane and Mr. 1). Brown were for the plain tiff ; and Mr. O'Malley, Q.C., for the defendant. This was the breach of promise case, and it appeared from the evidence that the defendant was • farmer in good cir curostanom, and the plaintiff the daughter of • respectable farmer in Berkshire, occupying the situation of schoolmis tress at • charity school in Loudon, with a salary of 401. per annum. She was 26 years of age, and the defendant was 67. In July, 1861, the tender passion seems to have taken • strong hold upon the defendant, for, in • turnip field, he made • declaration to the father of the young lady, to the effect that he " did not know what was the matter with him, for he was thinking so much about his daughter that 12/1 kept pulling up turnip. and putting them in again." At another time he cried • good deal, and said he would have married her long ago but for his family, and taking her band declared he would marry her, and there would not be each another at the Exhibition. Be coming confidential about his circumstances he told her he had 500/. • year from land, and money in railway shares. Upon this the young lady consented, as did her friends, sad she left her situation in London. The marriage was to have taken place in January, this year, and • handsome settlement to have been made. To the plaintiff's brother he gave • sovereign for the purchase of • ring; but not withstanding all that happened and wee said, "the course of true love did not run smooth." The defendant suddenly altered his mind and refused to perform his promise. On his behalf the only point urged for bim by his counsel was his age and the youth of the plaintiff ; but The jury, after bearing the summing up of the Lord Chief Baron, thought hews" old enough to have known better," and mulcted him in 2501. damages. JULY 21. CROWN COURT.—(Bsfore Mr. Justice Wightmeu.) Robert Jordan , 21, and William Craddock, 33, were charged with the wilful murder of Frederic Bodd on the 10th of May last. They were also charged with the like offence upon the coroner's inquisition. Mr. Mills, Q.C., and Mr. Stephenson were for the prose cution ; Mr. Metcalfe defended Jordan; and Mr. Serjeant Tozer defended the primmer Craddock. The court was densely crowded all day. Both prisoners reside in Bedford, Jordan being a journeyman blacksmith, and Craddock a journeyman carpenter. This was a very extraordinary case in many respects. The evidence, as proved to-day in court, pointed clearly to the assault having been committed by two civilians, whilst the deceased all along persisted in lay ing some soldiers attacked him. Another remarkable cif , cumstenoe was that this murder was committed on a Sun. day night, about 11 o'clock, within a hundred yards of the Rmhatreet, Bedford, and three men saw the brutal ill• usage to which the deceased was subjected. and made no attempt to assist him. These men were the chief witnesses to-day against the prisoners. What made the matter more extraordinary was that both the prisoners had excellent characters given them by a number of very respec table tradesmen resident to the town. - The deceased, Frederick Budd, was a solicitor at Bucking ham, but in cousuence of the recent death of his aunt, who had lived in this town, he was staying at her house, No. 12, Kimbolton-road. On Sunday, the 10th of May, Mr. Budd and his wife had spent the evening with Mr. Trapp, • draper, in High-street, and left his house at about ten o'clock, to sup with Mr. Pulley, an auctioneer, living in St. Paul's-square. Having supped, they left his house for home a few minutes after eleven, and tamed out of the High-street down Castle-lane, when they overtook the two prisoners and some other men. The militia at this time were out for their annual drill, and to the umber of 600 were quartered in the town, and at the time the unfortunate Mr. Budd was on his way borne the public-houses were being cleared and the streets were crowded. Mrs. Bndd said the men who attacked her hus band were dressed as soldiers, and there was a civilian amongst them, and that her husband, upon some other soldiers coming up, was assisted from the ground by them. In the first instance some soldiers were charged with the ' mime, and Lieutenant Boultbee, when before the coroner, said that Mrs. Budd complained to him that her husband had been hurt by some soldiers. The poor woman probably at this time was oonfosed and agitated, for it was but a few minutes after the assault that this statement was made, and when she and her husband were at the door of the house of Captain Boultbee, the chief constable of the county police, and to whom they had at once gone to meat complaint. The deceased seemed to be then under the impression that the soldiers had assaulted him, for to Lieutenant Book. bee (whose father, Captain Boultbee, was ill in bed) he stated that he had been knocked down by some soldiers, and that he met a picket and told the sergeant what had happened, but that the sergeant said he was drunk sod did not know what he was about. Lieutenant Boultbee Padded that all this time he It emcd very confused ; and no wonder, for in about three hours he died, and the surgeon who attended him. Mr. Robert Coachman. on making a post mortem examioatioo ' found • [texture of the skull of • zigzag character above an inch and a half in length, and about four ounce, of clotted blood between the brain and the dun meter. There were also a fracture of both the nasal bones and clotted blood in the nostrils, and abraded wounds about the left eye and forehead, also considerable extravasation of blood between the pericranium and frontal bones, corresponding with the situation of the abres , on of the skin on the external aortae.. That these injuries were the cause of death was certain, but by whom indicted became the question. For the prosecution it was 'tided and proved that the prisoners Jordan and Craddock and • black man were in Castle-lane at the time Yr. and Mrs. Budd were passiog, and that Craddock rolled up against Mr. Budd. Upon this Mr. Budd maid, "You cowardly fellow, what did you do that for ; give me your name, sir, if you please." upon which Craddock struck him with his right hand, saying " That is my name." Mrs. Budd by this time had disengaged her arm, and the prisoner Jordan then struck Mr. Budd, and he fell to the ground. Both prisoners then attacked him, and the black man ran off in alarm. Mr. Budd had • stick in Lis hand, but seems only have used it to ward off the blows, and one of the wit nesses, • man of the name of Hatton, " the gentleman ' did not Lit either of them, because be had not the chance, and he left them hitting at the gentleman." The black man, who described himself as a ship's cook, said they both struck the gentleman and knocked him down. " I saw them both beating him on the ground with their fists, and I ran away. One witness said the poor man called out, "Is there a Christian friend here who will assist me?" and Mrs. Budd also implored assistance. Mrs. Budd raised him from the ground, and when they bad got a few yards some soldiers and civilians came up, to whom Mrs. Budd said, " 1 have been gyms!) , insulted—l want protection," and shortly after the two prisoners cams up, and Craddock several times said, "It served the right ; be was drunk." Another wit ness who saw the attack also ran away, and the only assist ance the unfortunate man bad seems to have cane from his wife and some Mal who met him shortly after. In addition to the evidence given by Lieutenant Boultbee, a police-con stable was calles‘ who also deposed to the deceased hashes up to the time of his death persisted in saying it was soldiers that ill-used him. Mr. Metcalfe and Mr. Serpent Tozer addressed the jury upon these facts, resting the cam for the prisoners mainly upon the fact that Mrs. Budd in the first instance, and the deceased throughout, declared the men who made the attack were soldiers—a circumstance that left the case in gnat doubt, and which must make the MAO( the jury un usually difficult. 7be other point urged for the defence was, supposing the jury were satisfied the prisoners committed the mann which caused the death of Mr. Budd, were they not acting on a provocation, and from • notion that what they Wall doing was in self-defence? In that cam their verdict must I l m ." l " o .' ta f'. . . . . . After several saber - is had been called to speak to the pri amen' characters aa quiet sod steady men, his lordship summed op the evidence, sod the jury returood a verdict of msollaughter ; sod the Named judge sentenced the pri wows to seven years' pearl samtude. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. (Before the Assietent.ludge.) William Ford, convicted of dealing a watch, was brought up for judgment. Poliasconstable Holmes, 3 F, proved the following eon victiorie against the prisoner :—Four months on the 16th of Fs , 1859 ; be was sentenced to six months on the 28th of Fe , 1859, at the Old Bailey ; he was sea. towed to three years to • ship school, the Cornwall ; he escaped from the ship, and the above constable yea told of it, but before be could apprehend him be committed the robbery for which he is charged. The Assistant Judge briefly addressed the prisoner as to the career be bed run, and sentenced him to be kept in peed servitude for four years. William Sarnia! Tudor, 26, porter, was indicted for stealing five bottles of port wine, value 25e., the property of the Great Western Railway Company. William Brown said-1 reside at Marlborough. On the 3rd of July I sent off • hamper with port 1111:16 in bottles to • Mr. Woodall, Barnsoury-park. I coded it and sealed it. I gave it to • carrier named Pearos, and he took it to the Marlborough station. Thomas Pearce, the carrier, corroborated this statement. Thomas Stone, a lad, said—l assist my father at the Marlborough station. I remember on the .7.rd of July • parcel coming to me to be weighed. It weighed 3 qrs. Mb, I recollect the seal. It was • endow device. Thomas Preston—l am a porter at Hungerford. On the 4th of July I received the parcel and the receiving note. I placed it on the van for Paddington. A polioe-oonstable at Paddington said that on the morn ing of the 4th of July he was on duty at the Paddington station. The luggage van came up about a quarter to three in due course. I saw the prisoner about the trucks. I saw the prisoner do something to the hamper. Afterwards I saw him put his hand in the hamper. I then went and told Sergeant Goldsmith. We soon afterwards apprehended him, and he said, " Have mercy on me for the eke of my poor mother, an d do what you can for me." Sergeant Goldsmith corroborated this statement. Mr. Healey briefly addressed the jury for the prisoner, but the jury found the prisoner Guilty, and recommended him to mercy. The Assiatant Judge ordered that he should be brought up next session for judgment. EXPORTS FROM NEW YORK. Mr. & FITZGERALD—I gave notice to the noble lord, the; on the report of supply, or on going into committee of ways and means, I should ask a question with reference to the proceedings of the Federal authorities at the port of New York, but as I shall not have that opportunity, I beg to put the question Dow. The Federal government have required British subjects exporting goods from New York to eater into a hoed that no portion of those goods should afterwards fall into the heeds of any person connected with the Confederate States. The noble lord at the end of last eensioo spoke of this as a breach of the treaty between this country and the United States, and some correspondence ensued with reference to it which has never been laid on the table of the house. But the course complained of by the noble lord is still persisted in bthe Federal authorities at New York ; and not only that, but the Federal consuls at various ports refuse clearance, to British vessels unless hoods of that nature are entered into by the optains. I wish to ask whether the noble lord's attention has been called to the continuance of this practice, and whether any further correspondence has taken place upon the subject between this government and the government of the United Stake. . . ... Lord PALMERSTON—Her Majesty's government con sidered that the practice was not consistent with the inter national rights of this country, the ordinary intercourse of nations, and the treaties with the United States. A is. monstrance was made, and the Federal government pro mised to give such orders as would put an end to it. lam afraid those orders have not been quite effectual, because very recently communication has been made of an instead, in which the practice had been repeated. A representation has been made thereupon to the Federal government, sod I cannot bat hope that when the matter bail been brought again wider their consideration they will take effectual measures to prevent the recurrence of the practice. Mr. S. FITZGERALD observed that the correspondence had been laid before Congress, but in an incomplete form ; and be wanted to know whether there would be any ob jection to lay the correspondence that bad already taken place, and any further correspondence on the subject, on the table of the house? Lord PALMY.!MON replied that there would be no objection. POLAND. Mr. HENNESSY asked whether the government were in possession of Prince Oortchakoff's note to the Freoch go vernment, and if so whether it would be presented! Lord PALMERSTON said the government were not in possession of it in any way that would authorise them to communicate it to parlisainnt. PROXY VOTECG PAPERS. Mr. D. GRIFFITH moved the following resolution : "That the present amount of stamp duty on proxy voting papers, involving the neciesity of procuring • stamp of a psi fielder amount not always easily accessible to the voter, and thus impeding the exercise of a franchise, and also, according to the analogy of draft and receipt stamps, ex cessive in amount in comparison with such stamps, and not involving consideiation of importance to the revenue, might conveniently be reduced to one penny." He trusted the Chancellor of the F.achequr would net be so' tenacious of the small amount of revenue involved u to I refuse to make this alteration. Mr. WHALLEY seconded the motion. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHTQUE't admitted that the question was one of importance with regard to rail way and joint stock companies. So far u the government was oomenied they had shown every disposition to facilitate the exercise by the proprietors of joint stock companies of their privileges through the medium of proxies. So late am 1844 the tax was 30e. upon each proxy, but it had been reduced from that amount to 6d. He only waited for evi dence of a desire on the part of railway and joint stock companies that a further alteration should ba road* to enable him. if he continued to hold his present office, to make at the fitting time a proposal to the hones on the subject. (Hear, hear.) The course taken by the hon. member would, no doubt, have the effect of drawing attention to the subject, and of eliciting from the interested parties their feelings and wishes with respect to it. He admitted that the hon. gentleman was justified in what he had done, and he trusted it would have the effect of placing him (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) in the position of being able to come to some decision on the matter. He hoped the hoe. merobe• would be satisfied with this general assurance, and not press his motion. (Hear, hear.) The motion wu then withdrawn. LIEUTENANT TINLING. Colonel SYKE3 called attention to the dogmata of Ad. mire! Koper, dated April 14, 1863, reporting the death of Lieutenant Tioling, of her Majesty's ship Encounter, at the siege of Showshing. He gave a narrative of tbe circum stances cormected with the death of the young officer, to show that he wee present at the siege, not se an amateur, but was on duty. He moved for further papers on the subject. Lord O. PAGET, after paving a tribute to the gallantry and merit, of Lieutenant Tinting, and avowing his convic- Moo that the young officer believed he was doing hie duty, mid he was not prepared, without further intelligeooe, to state to the house that he had died in the execution of his duty. Mr. J. Wwrra and Mr. Bantu made a few remarks upon the sem, end the motion was withdrawn. THE CASE OF MR. O'MALLEY IRWIN. Sir F. KELLY moved an addreer to her Majlety to grant her Ilat to the petition of right of George °Valley Irwin, Eq. This motion. after a few words from the SOLICITOR: GENERAL, was withdrawn. THE CASE OF MR. W. BEWICKE. Mr. BF23.KELEY then rose to move the following resolution:—" That the grievenose suffered by Mr. W. Bewicke, as detailed in his petition to that house pre seated upon the 28th day of April last, were such as en titled him to the consideration of her Majeity's govern meat" The bon. member said the case of Mr. Bewicke was one of great hardship, as great as it was possible to comers could come before that house, and he would shortly state the oaten, of the injuries which that gentleman had suffered. The honourable member proceeded to describe the grievance of the petitiocer, who having engaged in a law suit was de feated, and a levy of has goods by the Sheriff of Northam berland was the raga. The mode of levy, the persona em ployed, and the ultimate consequences of the levy, coosti. toted thegrievasces of which petitioner oompleioed. The persons employed were, it appruied, men of bad character, sod the sum for which they had to levy was only 491. Mr. Bewicke, alarmed by their appearance as they approach: I his house, refused to admit them. Firearms were produced on both sides, but ultimately Mr. Berwick. barricaded himself in his house, the men remaining outside, and re aerieg refreshments by Mr. Bevricke's orders. Next day, thinking his pistol wanted cleaning, he fired it in the ur, previondy giving warning to the bailiffs, when the lathe; departed sod took out a warrant for his apprehension, on the charge of obstructing them in the discharged theirduty, and firing upon them with ball cartridge. Mr. &wicks was committed oo the oaths of there worthless persons, and held to bail iu the sum of 2.0001. He was tried at the sessions, where he defended himself, and was found guilty end sentenced to four years penal servitude. He (Mr. Berkeley) did not im , pagn the wisdom of the judge or the bona fides of the jury, believing that the latter were not more stupid than jurymen generally were. Mr. Berwick, was then cast among felons, cla4 in the feloos drein, and fed upon [elms' fare. No position could be more melancholy for a gentleman ; but there was some hope left for the unhappy m an . Hi s house keeper, a faithful servant, had bees examined on his trial, but had broken down under the excitement. No sooner, however, was her master sentenced mad imprisoned than this faithful woman devoted her whole energies to un ravelling the conspiracy under which be suffered. She col lected a mass of evidence, came off to London, and found her way to Serjeant She.. That learned gentlemaa received her in the kindest manner, thought there was • good deal in the facts she submitted, sad recommended her to Mr. Irving, • highly respectable solicitor of Ste pletho. Mr. Irvine immediately undertook the case sod proceeded to Northumberland, when he prosecuted the whole gang for conspiracy. They were convicted, end it was proved that they had themselves placed the bullet on the ground for firing which Mr. Bewicke had been sentenced to four years' peed servitude. Ooe of them turned Quireith evidence, and it was through him th at 31r. Beerieke's innocence was at last established. The poor gentleman then received the Queen's pardon, bat be who had entered the prison a robust and athletic man came out of it wasted in body and broken in mind, merely the shadow of hie former self. He re. tamed to his 1101.1110 to find it completely gutted and left in charge of his faithful housekeeper, of whom he (er. Berke ley) must stop to observe that she deserved to be immor talised as an honour to her sex. (Cheered Mr. Bewicke then ascertained that his manor, having formed part of the estate of the Earl of Der wentwater, which was transferred to Greenwich Hospital, the commiesiouers of that institution &emerged amoorial rights over it, and had io his absence sold bin property, as being that of a convicted felon. The goods, which were in valuable to him for their associations, were worth is the market about 1.500 L, but they were sold by the commis stoners for 4301. Mr. Berwick, went to them, told them be ' was no felon, hut an inoceest man. sod demanded restitu tion. The commissioners laughed at him, told him that the Queen's pardon had not purged has felony since he had re thived it, bat generously proposed to refund the proceeded the sale. This was the case which he (Mr. Berkeley) bad to submit to the boom, to the law officers of the crown, and to her Majesty's . goverament. It might be the emir of any of than any day an the week, and the Homer Secretary himself aright find Fellodee disposed of and its ancestral portraits, in the asses way sea had happesed at Fleetwood- RUM. Mr. PEEL moved that the house go into committee of the whole house for the purpose of moving for leave to bring in a bill to reduce the duty on rum in certain cases. Mr. HENNESSY wished for some explanation as to the object of the proposed bill. Mr. PEEL stated that the American war having, amongst other inconveniences, raised the price of spirits of turpentine, the object of the bill wee to reduce the duty on rum so le to permit of its being used as a substitute. Mr. HENNESSY bad been told that Irish whisky might be used for the purpose, and indeed be believed that it had been used io the form of methylated spirit in cer tain cases. He wanted to know why the West India in terest was especially selected for favour in this case, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER observed that no preference of the West Indies over Ireland or Scot land was attempted. If whisky would answer the purpose of preparing good paint by all means let it be employed, but the representation made to the government was that there was a particular fatness in rum for the purpose. The bill, however, would give no preference to one spirit over ano ther; but would simply place West India rem on a footing with British spirits, and whichever made the beet paint might he med. The resolution was then agreed to, and the hones having resumed leave wee given to bring in the bill. PETIT OFFENCES BILL. Mr. WHALLEY motel tlnTseriond Wading of this bill. Mr. BRUCE said the bill proposed changes of the greatest magnitude is the criminal law of the country, which could not possibly be oimaidered at this period of the session. It was possible that amongst the thousands of policemen who were even night employed in the metropolis there might be individual case* of abuse of power ; but there was no reason to charge them with wholesale misconduct. He b therefore to more that the bill be read a second time el t day three moetbs. Mr. WHALLEY withdrew the bill, The order for the wooed roadie( wee then withdrawn. INDEMNITY BILL. This bill waa reed a third time end passed. The Colonial Letters Patent Bill, the Jurisdiction of Justices Bill, and the Pauper Lunatic Asylums Bill, were also read a third time and pared. The Clergymen (Colonies) Bill, the Alteration in Judges' Circuits Bill, and the Superannuation (Union Officers) Bill. were read a second time and ordered to be committed. The Lords amendment to the Oaths Relief in Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Bill was considered and agreed to. The house sdjourned at • quarter to one o'clock. THE FUELING RAILWAY& —The first turf Wall turned ea Thursday of this undertaking, intended to furnish increased facilities of direct communication between the metropolis sod the Isle of Wight, to aid the development of Hayl iug Island, • favourite sea-bathing place on the south west, and to utilise Langton Harbour. The band of the Havant Bitten was in attendance, and the coast guard station and tent in which the entertainment took place were decorated as customary on such occasions. Yesterday the works were commenced by the contractors, who have under taken to construct and complete the line, which will run from Havant, at the junction of the Brighton and of the South Western Direct Portsmouth railways to the mouth of Langton Harbour, in conjunction with docks, wharfs. and the requisite waterside seeosoniodadio• twave mouths. [AdifeTtiattinent.]—HOLLOWAT'S 011ifTRIM AND Prue.—Yo Risg.—When the surgeon shakes his bead and the patient feels despondent le the fittest time to try these n o ble ymedsgs. Lejlarnalations, sores, eruptions, ulcerations, bad legs, and a far loupe hat of external tortures, can always be eared by them Incomparable medicaments. If the cure be not always rapid it will always be complete. and leave behind no sotrof re . this ointment exert& the mast cooling. ng. and power. over the moat Irritable. painful. and chronic sores is an established fact. which is daily con firmed by the unsolicited testimony of sympathising patients whom (to me their own expressive phrase, Holloway's remedies hate rescued tram the my verse of death. THE ROUPELL FORGERIES. This trial was resumed yesterday morning at Chelmsford. The case for the plaintiffs having been brought to a con clusion on Monday afternoon, Mr. Bovill yesterday ad• dressed the jury on behalf of the defendants. Serjeant Shea, before he did so, said that in conse quence of an observation that had fallen from his lord ship on the preceding day, it had been thought advisable that Min Sarah Roupell should be in attendance, and she was now in court, and he proposed to examine her. Mr. Bovill said be should object to any further evidence being adduced after the case for the plaintiff had closed. Baron Cheapen said he considered that this lady could give important evidence, and in the interests of justice he should allow her to be examined. Mies Sarah Roupell was accordingly placed in the witness box. In sower to question■ put to her by Mr. Serjeant She. she said—l was living at Aspen-house when my father died, and for some years previously. This letter (the letter of instruction to prepare the deed of gift) was written by me. I remember writing it. It was at the request of my brother William. He was present, and no one else. My brother dictated to me. I wrote it at the time it bean date, Jan. 8, 1856. I cumin remember that I ever told anybody I wrote it. Cress-examined—l think I can swear I never told any one. Ido not mean I think. I will swear I did not. I never told my mother. I was not aware that my mother had given any property to my brother William. I had not seen this letter for a year until it was put into my hands this morning. I swear that the letter was not shown to me yesterday. I have been in Chelmsford since last Thursday, and my mother also. Mr. Bovill—Are not these proceedinp against the wish of your mother and your brother Richard? The witness heiitated, and Serjeaot Shoe objected to the question. The witness then said she did not think they objected to these proceedings, but they would bays been glad if any other course could have been adopted that would have saved expense to the family. Mr. Lioklater told me that I should not be called en a witness if it could be avoided, and I was informed lest night after the court had risen that I should have to give evidence about this letter, in consequence of what the judge bad said, but the letter was not shown me. Baron Channell—lt was in my box locked up. (A laugh.) Craw-examination continued—As children, the family were in the habit of scribbling each other's mimes, but did not mean anything wrong. I have signed my mother's came, not for anything wrong, but to save her trouble. I remember perfectly well that I mete the letter in the drawing-room, and my brother William dictated it to me. I do not remember seeing anybody on the gams morniog, but I suppose my father wee there. Mr. Bovill—Then your mind is a perfect blank upon everything else that occurred on this day except the letter? W'itoess—l do not remember anything else. Mr. Bovill then addressed the jury for the defendants. The learned counsel proceeded to call the attention of the jury to various dieerepaocies in the evidence of William Roupell, end particularly to the fact that although be pretended to have kept beck the genuine Imam for the purpose of copying the signatures of the tenants, the signatures he afterwards put to the fictitious instruments were totally dissimilar, and there was not the slightest resemblance to the genuine signatures. His learned friend had, as he thought, most improperly and unnecessa rily introduced the question of the will, with which the defendants had nothing whatever to do, but as he bad done so, he should make use of it and contend, on the part of the defendants, that unless the jury be lieved the ' , Adams of William Roupell es to the existence of a genuine will of 1850, and that by this will the property was devised to Richard Roupell, he would not be estiticd to a verdict in the present action. He then referred to the proceedings of William Roupell in connexion with the wills, and asked whether they co uM possibly believe that be did not look at the genuine will for a week after it came into his possession ' or the: he retained the document for more than six years, and did not destroy it until the 29th of March, IriV2, the day before he left England. Again the jury would remember that Mrs. Roupell, the m other, was in the house in Cross-street every day for aweek after the funeral, and she must have known everything that took place there, and yet she was not called es a witness. It was said that William Roupell was solely actuated by • feeling of sincere repentance. Sincere repentance indeed ! Why le did not say a word until the mortgagees of this property threatened to foreclose the mortgage, and he knew that the forgery of the leases must be discovered, and then he attempted, first, to shut the mouths of the attorneys by slleging that the deeds relating to the other property were also forged ; and having failed in this, be boldly resolved to tell the extraordinary story he had done, in order to get be lk property of the value of 200,000/. for his The learned counsel next proceeded to argue that the will now alleged to be forged was a very reasonable one, and it was very likely that the old man should have left the property nominally to his wife instead of leaving it to William Roupell, for the jury would remember that the property was alleged to be worth 400,000 f., and that if it had been left tattle latter, he was illegitimate, and that the legacy duty would have amounted to 40,0004, and this sum MA saved to the family by the property being left to the mother. It being now put one o'clock the court was adjourned for a short period, and upon the return of the jury Mr. Soria resumed kis address to them for the defendants. The learned counsel then commented at considerable length upon the effect of the will, and be also remarked upon the evidence as to the handwriting, and he said that he should call witnesses from the Hank of England, from which establishment they would remember not • single witness had been called by his learned friends, although the old m►n had kept an account there, and they would state their opinion with regard to the signatures to the instruments that were alleged by the plaintiff to have been forged. He then pro. cot ded to make some humorous comments upon the slight peculiarities by which some of the "experts" had pro fessed to come to a positive conclusion that the signatures were not genuine, and be said be should produce • number of receipt' that were undoubtedly signed by the deceased, and they would Hod that every one of Ikon sup posed peculiarities was sometime' absent a•d sometimes present, aod signed that this portion of the evidence was really worth nothing at all. The learned counsel, in the course of his further observations, urged that the whole case came from • polluted source, commencing with the smelting pot of the old man, from which he had obtained 400,0001., and that every trick and artifice had been resorted to with • view to mislead the jury, and to wrest a verdict from them ; and he concluded by saying that the questions to be decided by the jury were, first, whether the deed of gif t of January, 185 h,, was executed by Richard Palmer Roupell in the presence of the attesting witnesses, Truman and Dove ; secondly, who. they the signature was genuine, although it might not have been signed in the presence of those witnesses ; and, thirdly, whether the will of 1830 gave this property to the plaintiff ; and unless they were satisfied upon these points the defen dants were entitled to their verdict. He concluded • most eloquent and able address by stating that if they were to return a verdict for the plaintiff upon such facts as appeared in the present came, it might be attended by the most dan gerous and frightful results. The following witnesses were then examined for the de fendant. _ . Mr. T. West said—l was a tenant of Mr. Richard Roapell for bye-and-twenty years, and I frequently saw him sign receipts for rent that I paid him. The deed of gift was then shown to the witness and he said he believed the signature, Richard Palmer limps% wee his handwriting. Crassexamined—My only reason for allying it is his hand writing* that the signature resembles those to my receipts for rent. I perceive there are some slight differences be tween the two signatures, but that does not shake my opinions 11. In mower to a question put by the jury, the witness said that having carefully examined the receipts and the signa ture to the deed of gift, he was of opinion that the signature to the latter was genuine. Mr. G. Lady, another tenant of old Mr. RocipeWs, gave similar evidence. He also expreassel a positive opinion that the signature to the deed of gift was the handwriting of the deceased. lo rromoraminotion be void h► Amid mach rather say that the signature wa► . geouiso true t►.n th►t it erns on imitotio§ of We signature by • & halal forger. He weut to Docton'-commons, and saw the will that was alleged t o g o forged, and in his opinion the signature to that will we e e genuine signature. The letter of instruction to Mr. Whitaker was then shown to the witness, and he said that signature was • forgery. Mr. Shutter. • letter sorter et the General Poet-office, s o d who was also • tenant of the deceased, produced some receipts that had been g iven to him by Rich 4 Roupell, and he a:premed an opinion that the 'ignit on to the deed of gift was genuine. Similar •I'DCO was given by other wheelers, led e great number of receipts were put in, the object hom e t o show that the deceased coestantly varied his signature, and that very few of them were ebsolutely alike. Is sae instance it appeared that the deceased had oily put one 1 to the name of Romig!, but Serjeant She* suggested th at this probably arose from the deceased tannin began to sign so close to the end of the paper that there wee not sufficient apace for the final letter. Mr. Phipps, the secretary to the Lambeth 'Waterworks Company, proved that the deceased wee &shareholder in that company, and identified the signatures to two tranasn shares that had been made by him. Be also produced eevecal dividend warrants that had been signed by the do ceased, and there appeared to be some observable different between the signatures. The witness then looked at th e deed of gift, and said that the signature was a:roadies', like that of the deceased, but that he could not say that 4 was Ms signature. It was very like it. By the jury —Witness had never seen the deed of gift be. fors that day. Some further evidence of the same character was thee given, after which the court adjourned. It given,, not expected that the trial will be brought to a conclusion before Friday. MARKETS. TALLOW.—TOMMAY Emarnm.—The market mu firm to-day at the unbiased quotations : Spot, 42a. to 42.. ad.; Sagest to September, 425. 6d. ; October to December, 45a. ; December, 45e. 6d. Delivery to lan evening, 116 maks ; snivels ditto, 240 mike. COOTTON.—LIVIIPOOI, JULT firm' l.—We have to report a fair demand to-day, with • market. Prices remain uncharged. The salsa are 6,000 bales, of which 2,000 are for export and speculation. COTTON GOOD& —Mascarene, Jmx 2L —ln yarns there has been • pod deal more business for various quarters at the full pries@ of last weak. There has been business doing for Chios, for India, for the Mediterranean, and some little for Germany. The home trade are ase buyers, chiefly for mauutacturera. There has been some doubt thrown epos the news of the fall of Vicksburg, which has bad its weight in deterring buyers, but upon the whole the market for yarns closes strong, though in many ones buyers ere disposed to wait the arrival of next advice, from America, and to hold orders which are not very priming in abeyance. In the cloth market we have had less business than in yarn. It was anticipated that the American news would have lad to pester activity, and sellers have been asking rather full prices ; but in the expectation of more business the ha ve been somewhat disappointed. Sellars are decidedly and in soon ones prices ban hardened, bat the buyers or nearly all markets seem dis posed to act cautiously, and await further advice'. There have been more inquiries for some classes of India fabrics, the letters now to hand from Bombay and Calcutta being of a rather encouraging character, but they have not lad to much business. W here orders were pressing, and have had to be executed, sellers have exacted the full rates current during the last few weeks, and more than could have ben obtained under some circumstances. On the part of sellers the penal opiates seems to be that they an in a position to command foil prices is the preent state of American affairs, bat there are exceptions to this feeling. On the part of buyers there is more or less doubt, and some of them are holding back in expectation of a decline. WOOLLEN.—LDe, JULY 21.—There was • fair et. tudance of buyers sod manufacturers in both halls today, but the aggregate transactioos were not in proportion. la the coloured market • cousiderable quantity of tweeds met with purchasers, also • sprinkling of meltoos of autumn substance, and a few lots of milled diagonals. In the white market the leading demand was for intrieys end Mauler fabrics suitable for the fall trade. Plain cloths were not much in request. Rates in all departmenta are fully.ous tained. MANUFACTURE9.—HIMDIMirrILD, Jny 2L —The extraordizuuily fine weather which has characterised the prompt month has bad the effect of reduciog stocks of light goods, and a few orders for more come oocsaionally to hand. Some manufacturers are also busy producing winter goods, the demand for which is now on the increase. WOOLS.—HUDDIESPIZIA, JULY 21.—The arrivals fees present rtes us yet assay, and buyers seem diapered to emit for better choice. A few wads has been moved durisi the week et former prices. CORN.—Hon, JULY 2L —At to-days market a mode rate supply of English wheat, which is tam off at last week's currency, beet rum of red making 46e. to 46.. per 5041 his. Foreign held as late nada, but demand quite retail. Barley for grinding steady at prior rather in favour of sellers. Bases sod peas unaltered. Oat. in fair request at former prices. The foreign imports last week are es under : Wbest, 4.061 qrs. ; barley, 3,911 qrs. ; eat., 2406 qrs. ; peas, 456 qrs. ; tares, 170 qrs. ; linseed, 12,590 qrs. ; rapeseed, 33 qrs. ; oil cakes, 77 toss. Lazne, JULY 21.—Fute fresh samples of English red and white wheat are mach inquired after, and command an ad vance of ls. from last Tuesday's rates ; foreign held more firmly, which checks the sale. Barley nominal. Spring corn unaltered in demand or value. :113i:Ti1.--Wellad a small attendance at market to-day, and a short show of wheat, which sold readily at Is. more money. Grinding barley in request and fully at dear. Beans and oats—Prices without alteration. The weather, although fine, ha. not been so hot as last week. The root crops are represented to be suffering from the want of rain. Per imperial quarter to the grower:— Wheat, white, new, 6111 m. to Übe. per imperial bushel, 50s. to 525. • ditto red, 61Ibe. to 62.11:e., 44.. to 465. Barley, dist illing, 5011 m. to 511 ha, 30s. to 32.. Oats, 36Ibs. to 4211 m., 7b. to 26.. Beans, new, 6316 e. to 6411 m, 3tla to 40s. FfiticiStite.oB-Tv se, JULY 21.-The weather since Satur day has been cloudy and cold, but dry. Our market this morning lost the buoyant tour of Saturday, and transac tions in wheat wen much more limited though price. were maintained. Flour steady. In barley, beans, and peas little passing. Flee malt inquired for. Oats a slow sale. fialrantla, JULY 2L -At today's market the general supply of grain was short, but it being a very wet morning, I the attens was above an average, both of buyers and sellers. There was an evidestly strong inclination on the part of buyers to purchase, but there being but a few sam ple. of rea lly good wheat on offer, a limited trade was the reault, and proms firm. Flour nominally unaltered. Grind ing barley and malt were quite as dear, and in oats, beaus, and peas trade was limited, and prices nominally unal tered. Wheat, 365. to 31.. Barley, 25.. to 40a. Oats, 225. to Va. Beam, 425. to 48s. Peas, 365. to 40s. Rye, 3th. to 38.. per qr. Flour, 36a. to 40k per sack. Malt, 64a. to 66e. per qr. cArn.E. --SA LISEURT, JOLT 21. -Our market to-day was much better supplied with beast* than of late, both in quality and quantity, and there was a good attendance of buyers. The increased supply caused trade to rule dull at the commencement of business, but Late in the day a good clearance was effected, at rather more mousy. There was a capital supply of prime sheep, and with a good demand, all quickly changed hands, former prices being In some instances exceeded. There were a few pens of lambs offered, which sold at high prices. A short supply of calves, which sold at full prices. We had a good supply of pigs, in which a good business was done, but prices were very low. Best ox beef, Ile. 6d. to 12s. 6d. per score ; cow and heifer dittodips. to I la. ; best Bowe mutton, 7d. to 74d. per 10. ; tton of inferior quality, 6d. ; veal, 64d. to 7d.; fresh pork, 60. to 7d. ; salted ditto, 7d. to 74d., and 9e. to 9s. 6d. per score; greets bacon. 74d. to Bd. per lb. ; dry ditto, Bd. to lid. ; sweet pickled harm, 844. to 9d.: quarter old dote pigs, 10e. to 12s. each ; cows with calves, 111, to 141. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. GitAvßegirti.—Anived : July 20. London. groan Gothenburg : London. Gibraltar: Zingari, Bordeaux. July H. Con. cord* Ebenezer, Middleton, Reliance, and Wave, Guernaey &teas, Harburg . England a Rome. Bert:dee auret, Gravellues: Hamburg, Cronstodt Jane. Tobago; lada, Africa: Lope de Vega, Santander. Morshmallon, Taganrog; Melbourne. New York ; Neptune, Belize ; Prinds Oscar, Quebec. 20. Favourite Law to Halifax : Goeforth. Bom bay Moselle, Antwerp: Red Riding Hood. Whompoo Water loo, Rotterdam. July 21. Ann, Dunkirk ; De Hoop, Seville. LIVIIII'OOL—Arrive4 July 11. Elizabeth, from SE John's, N. B.: Alpha, and Prosper. Pomona.. Sailed.—July 21. tit. Thomas M. to 81. Thomas Hero 'ea% Melbourne; Louisiana -a. New York Ebro *C. Corinna Tiuziautlmal (is'. Boolean.; Cizildwall Abbey, Calcutta Mira beth Fry, Bombay: Donna Marla, Vera Crux Dora, Sydney; Jane Thompson, Galata king of Trumps, Quebec. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. BIZALTLERK —July lA, In Bryairdonsquare, the Lady AJDOLI Weatuorth Beauelerk. of a daughter. H 0111.411 WW KR. - July 9). at Nort-lkaquare. Hyde-park, the wife of J. liornblower, req., of a daughter. MARRIAGES. lIRITT—POY N77..—July 14 at Ttdenham, by the Rev. P. Bard. Commander S. P. Brett, R. 8., to Mary, daughter of the late commander N. Poynt.r., 8.N., of hetherop, Tidenhans. Glot eestershire. ISHEIt—UANIELL—JuIy la, at tripper Rolling/lope Hereford. shire, by the tier. J. Johnson, T. St. fisher. Esq.. 'of MIX,- pines, Herefordshire. to Isabella Sophia Pye, daughter of tilts ker. E. H. Daniell, of I:ppar Bidlinghope. DEATHS. --- COOPER —July 19, R. Cooper, rap , Eartsterrace, Kensing• toe, and °stemless, Cheapilde. aged 46. DUTHIE.. - July 10, et ?serfdom.' House, Lint; Leith, B. Mathis Bel. TICHILLL—J My 19. M residence. 10, Clatetereet, Dublin. Eduard Ms.. 44 C., tats Chairman of Bessiers, comity Armagh. i u his Ma year. WHITC—JuIy 14, at Brasswietigass, Basnaburyased, too. I. White, Zig.. aged 4t. Printed and Published by bathtub (PO HAI" ot No. S. Lombard street, In the Qty of Undo% Pr4aNr, at the 05.% In Lombard street, to the Precinct of Wltleefriars..o WIDNENDAT, JILT t 2, f 7)4 6 a