The Express. — London, England, 1863-06-30 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. 1101:18i OF LOBDS.—KONDAY, Juisii 29. Their lordship as Pon ettor 4. ROYAL 0092118810 N. The royal meat magma by ocanniaMon to the follow lag bills :—lnland R. weans; Militia Pay ; Loudon, &c., Dioeme ; Offeuoss (South Africa) ; African Slave trade Treaty ; Bleaching and Dyeing Works Act Amendment ; Loral I;..vorninest (Supplemental) ; Coventry Market Bowe; Norwich Poor ; Means, Oss ; Stourbaidge Rail way; Osweatry sad Walchpool Railway; Ashbourue, Sod. Iraq, and Texan Bridge. sod Cttozeter sod Caßingwood reed • Cork and Youghe Railway • St. Lakes (Middlesex) Workhouve and 'Vestry Hall ; Mohan Bridge ; Llanelly Railway sad Dock ; Bann Navigation I m p rovement; Dockley Railway ; lautiosetoe had South Devon Railway • Birkenhead Improvement ; Metal sod Portehead Pier and Pesuith Railway ; Landau and South Western aid Andover sad Redbridge Railways; Newport Paguell Railway; Transivere Docks and Yarmouth Glea. The Lords Conitaissioaera ware the Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Si. Germans. sod Viscount Sydney. Their lordship. thew adjourned till o'clock, at which from the Loan CHANOCLI.OI took his beat or the woolsack. COURTS OF OONCILL(TION BILL Lord BROUGHAM withdrew the Suitors Conciliation Bill, and. haring said a few words in explanation, presented smother with the Num object. NEW ZEALAND. Lord LYTTELTOR presentedSPTtitioti from Taranaki, Niro Zealand, os the subject of the distress brought upon the by the native war ; and in calling the attention of the loess to the subject. and to that of the military defence of the colonies, the noble loot obescrod that it was difiktilt to devisee remedy for the uoliappy state of affairs referred to in the petition, and it would be idle to expect that parliament should make a specific grant for that purpose. The eciontil kgielature had voted a sum—he believed not less than • 250,000/.—for the relief of the degrees that had arisen, but • colony like New Zealand would necessarily experience great difficulty in raising such an amorist, and it had been sup gaited to him that the home government might assist the seamy by guarantee or otherwise in raising the whole or a portion of that amount. The Duke of NEWCASTLE denied that the government. Meditated abandoning the colonists in their difficulties, and maid that none of his dispatches contained one word that would beer that construction. He maintained, however, that the war was begun with the cordial support of the colociats themselves for their sole benefit, ►nd that in spits of it the colony had made wonderful progress. Sir George Grey, the governor, was pursuing at mice a wise, states manlike, resolute, and humane policy, and be was most wasiause of its results. Earl GREY was afraid that the policy of the goversment we • &his on. The root of the evil was the omistitutioa of New Zealead, and although the ability of Sir George Orgy might overcome its defects for the present, mischief erriuld break teeth agaio. After • few words from Lard LYVEDEN, the subject dirtPPed• POLAND. Earl RUSSELL said—Before the orders of the day are pro ceeded with I wish to make an appeal to my noble friend (the Marquis of Clunteards) with regard to the C:nwhich he prepense to more for. The two mentioaed is his sotios, gamely, " The ar mlet note of Lord Castlereagh to the plenipotentiaries of the mopes, at Vienna, dated 12th January, 1815," and "The reply to that note of Prince Metternich and Baron Wersenberg, of 21st January, 1815," are both cootaieed the papers which were kid on the table of your lordships' hem by command the other day. The third paper, namely, " The note of Prince Taßeyrand, the Primes Metternich upon Poland, dated 19th December, 1814," was. I believe, printed in the elate papers, and is not included he the papers which 1 presented. If my noble friend chooses to move for It, it can be pre seated, and then it will come as • regular deernment before this home. I understood this morning that it was the intention of my noble friend to raise • debate on this question. Now I must ask my noble friend not to bring on the discussion at the present moment, feeling otworinoed that to do so would be very injurious to the public interest, and that it would seriously separate the responsibility of them wbo are charged with the ma segment of public attain The positim of the matter is this. There have been notes presented at St. Petersburg by the ambassadors of Banked, Fiance, and Austria, sad those despatches were only forwarded to Prince Cart eliskoff on Friday or Saturday last—l think on Saturday. Prince Gortchakoff said that he would take the orders of the Emperor with regard to them ; but no opinion whatever has been given upon their contents. I cannot but think that under these cirmioneances a discussion might seriously mjndis the propositioaa of the three governments, and I her my noble fried will wait at least until we hear farther es the subject. Meanwhile there can be no action on the pert of bet Majesty's goverment—sad I suppose the noble bird wishes to prevent any adios on the part of the govern ment that is likely to be taken aatil some reply ia received. Therefore my noble friend, by postponing his motion, would ma no rink of the ptvernment being allowed to adopt mea sures of which this house might not approve. Of come my noble friend is aware that whoa the answer is received it will be immediately premeted. The Marquis of CLAHRICARDE —I cheerfully and gladly comply with the request of my noble friend, and T should not think of say* anything at all on the "object to which be has referred, bat I shall ask leave to withdraw my *dice. I most say that I nee the word " gladly" ad. Madly. My noble friend and her Majesty's government met feel that indepeadent members of parhameot are now relieved from that responsibility, which I for one think rested on them, to notice the propositions which have beers stated le the other house of parliament to have bees made, farther with the iotimatioo that no injury would arise to the public service from any discussion of those propositions. I should have thought that if the house bad been silent after what I have sow stated had taken place, we should be UMW honour sad good faith to have oonsidered ourselves hound by that same beooeforth more or less. I can mare my Bade Mead that Doman could more gladly leave the question in the heads of my noble friend at the bead of the government than I do, but I do think that the position eel the government is, after what has occurred, so very novel, that the question owe be dimmed. Feeling relieved from all respossibility 14 the matter, I shall most gladly with draw my motion. The Earl of DERBY—I can, of come, have no objection te the course which the noble marquis is pursuing ; and I Mink that after the request made by the noble earl oppo dee, it would be impossible for him to take any other mutes. At the same time I have amy Maim impression that if berry were to be doss to the public service by Menssios in this house, injury must also be dose by dimasioo in the other house. (Hear, hear.) It would be • great convenience if the principal members of the government connected with foreign affairs in the two houses bad some little concert with each other as to what would, and what would not, be injurious to the public service. (Hear, bear.) The noble earl appeals to the noble marquis to postpone his motion on the ground that ik discarioa would be prejudicial to the public service. Bat when • motion is mode to postpone discussion in another place, up gets the Prime Minister and says be has not the slightest objection to Mansion. and that no injury can be done by it. He actsally votes against the postponement of discuesios, and, being left in a minority, sod the question not then coming on. be takes the unusual course of ex plaining the whole of the lions—propositions which are at this moment resrvd for future contideratioo. (Hear, hear.) I guppies we must adopt the doctrine at th e earl that it is dangerous to Mem this 'Ab ject in the Home of Lords, although. according to the Prime Minister, the question is one which may be discussed is the Hones of Coatroom with impunity, and without the slightest prejudioe to the public service. (Hear, beer.) I mama I is at • lom to recoiled' the different views of time two high authorities (bear, beer)—but I suppose that is this boom we must bow to the authority of the noble earl. At the mere time I entirely concur in the view of the noble marquis that it we do keep silence on this question it is at tins request of the government, and we are thereby relieved from any responsibility fur the bonne which is taken. I will not now eater into the question, but I cannot help Raving that the circumstances of the present time appear to me likely to be productive of so much difficulty and embalmment, that I think the house would not have done its duty if it had entirely kept silence but for the simnel request of the Secretary of State, who is himself mainly responsible fur the conduct of foreign often*. (Hear, hear.) Earl RUSSELL—I take entirely upon myself the remon sibility of asking my noble friend not to bring on this mo tins. He may draw any inference that be pleases from my making that request. Ido so oat my own respon sibility, being charged with the special direction of foreign affairs. I do not think it at all necessary to defend the course taken by my noble friend in the other house. (Laughter.) A particular come may have been expedient ten days ago, though It may aot be expedient now. The Earl of DERBY—I think the difference wbieh hs bees referred to ran only be reconciled in one way, which is by supposi ng th at mach greater attention is paid to any thing which falls from your lordships in this house than to what occurs in the other home. (A laugh.) It is only is that way that the difference mu be reconciled. Hear.) Earl GREY—I hope that that is the proper interprets. Mee, and that it is sot that this house is supposed to he so wanting in jodgeneat sod discretion that it cannot be trusted to the woe inked as the °thee home (Laughter.) The motion was then withdraws. METROPOLIS TURNPIKE ROMA ACTS AMEND MENT BILL. This bill was rend • mooed time. LOCAL GOVERNMENTBILL. SUP PLEMENTAL (No. 2) Thia bill was air read • *mooed Ulm. WAY WARDENS' CONTRACTS BILL. This bill purr throe. ansmitre. DISTRICT PARDON/AL CHURCHES (IRELAND) BIL. This bill Ina road a sow L ed time. INCLOSURE (Na. 2) BILL. This bill land through cossaittos. - - - LEASES AND SALES OF RETRIED ESTATES ACT AIIF.NDMIENT BILL. Ws bin was reed • third U.. and pt•red. brodidps adirmaisd U 25 nimble Won sight. THE EXITEV, TUES t IVENING, JUNE 30, .1863, HOUSE OF COMMONS.—MONDAY, JUN 29. The SPIRAL= took the chair at 4 deka. PRIVATE RUBINEIR3. The order that the South Mayo Railway Bill as amended be considered was read sad discharged. The St. Ireland West Coro wall Jeoctios Railway Bill, and the Victoria Station sod Pimlico Railway Bill were read a second time. i lowed to carry on a warfare by • semis chick would iniliot on • country 3,000 or 4,000 mil. on greater is jury in an eeooomioel sense, apart from the l a ttle-field sod its blood shed, than they indicted Imo° each other. Yek =eh was the mire is the present war. He believed thetas Prestos, or Blackburn, or Rochdale greater evil was amid by the War than was felt by any town in the ()sited States. Bat who were the principal authors of this system of warfare I Undoubtedly the public men of this country. The Chamber of Commerce at Liverpool had lately paned a resolution in favour of this system of blockade as eseential to our maritime supremacy. It was • pnnciple which England cherished, antler the idea that when she be came belligerent it would be usef al to herself. The noble lord had spoken or that blockade as being ineffective, sod stated • fact to pi ...a it which involved a great fallacy. He said that 40 1Y47 cent. of the vestal attempting to break the blockade succeeded in doing so ; but he forgot that the great porta of tmerica were sealed up, and that it was r . 2 .111 the smaller ports, and by small mewls, that the ma truck was carried on. Did the noble lord suppose that if the trade was extensive cotton would be at its present high price, or that the price of British goods at Charleston and other porta would be so extravagantly high ? (Hear.) He took it that the blockade waa cruelly effective ais sgaiaat Ragland sad as against the Southern States of America. The noble lord had referred to the law of blockade, sod bad stated that the American cruisers bad no right to stop a vessel going from this country to Nsasau, whatever might be its cargo, provided the meal was ostensibly destined for Nauru. Lord B. CECIL—What I maid was that if the vessel was bock Ade destined to Nassau, whatever the cargo might be the vessel should not be stopped. mfr. 00BDEN—The ship may be stopped whatever the ammo. Lord R. CECIL—I should have said seized. Mr. COBDEN—The noble lord said slopped. Lend Stowell laid it down that the ostensible destination of a vel . ad should be its real destination. Suppose • maid started from Liverpool to Nassau with regular ship's papers, but the supercargo furnished with orders to run to Charkstou if epportueity offered, and that the yowl was stopped and ' evidence of that sort found, the vessel might be carried into • prize court in the United States. How was the endure to be found except by stopping the vessel It was no doubt an inconvenieeoe and • bee, and it was this inconvenience and loss that the noble lard was now making his grievance. He would admit the noble lord's law, that if the venial were bona fide intended for Nassau it was not subject to seizure. j Bat everybody knew that • greet contraband trade was being carried on with the Southern Stake—that our mer chants were engaged in it—that joint.stock companies furnish the feeds; Lod, with this knowledge, was it not eomethioglike affectatima to come down to the hum and complain of some inoonveniesee arising from interference with this trade. It was not only affectation, it was . mad unreasonable. We mans:cope the inconvenience as moat He was not such • purist as to say that capitalists might not be engaged in this contraband trade. The Queue did not soy they must not, but by her proclamation I she mimed her subjects that if they engaged in i such trade they would incur the penalties of nter satiosal law as administered by the pries courts of the United Stake. Of course he claimed for English mule and merchandise seined a fair trial ; but the noble I lord had admitted that the prize courts, whether impartial or otherwise, were the only tribunals where them trials , weld take place. Ilie noble lad mid • good deal against the character of the American prize courts. He (Mr. Cobden) did not think that the noble lord's opinion coincided with the opinion of more competent judges. Lord l i yudhurst, in a case of maritime law, oftener quoted the einem of Judge Story and Chancellor Kent, of the Anted -1111111 courts than of Lord Stowed, of our own. What right, then, had the noble lord to annum that the American courts would be more partial than our own! He spoke about American judges delivering their decisions with soldiers and bayonets at the door, but he (Mr. (Nikko) asked what proof was there of such as allegation! He believed he was as diligent an observer et peseerg events in America as the noble lord, and he had sot read that decisions in favour of President Lincoln had been given under the pressure of military force. Let the noble lord in future accompany such assertions by prods. The noble lord had alluded to the case of the Alexandra. He was not going to nay whether the law es laid down by the learned judge who had tried that mu was right coon s but this he ventured to tell the noble lord—as • better friend, he thought, to the commercial intereet of the country then the noble lord was—that if the interpretation of the judge in the late trial were confirmed by the judges, or the House of Lords, sad the law, is that event s laid down should be adopted as international law, it would be far more injurious to the shipowners and commercial interests of this country then to those of the rest of the world. As be understood the decision, it amounted to this—that a neetrel power might build ships of war for a belligerent ; and provided ally that that power keeps the armament and the ships apart until they get three miles from the there, those ves sels might, as armed vessels of war, without going home to • belligerent port, take and seize and carry off any prises that might fall in their way. Another consequence would be this, if England were at war with Brazil—nay, if we were at war with Ireland, provided only that Ireland were acknowledged as • belligerent—it would be oorope teet for the shipbuilders of Boston or New York to build • vessel of war, tow her out to sea, the same tug boat having attached to it another vessel full of munitions el war, and provided only that the vessel was not armed in port, bat had her armament put on board three miles from shoes then that was a vessel which Dodd be seat to cruise against us, during our war with Brazil or Ireland, mad we should have no ground at complaint spinet the shipbuilders of New York or Boston. Was that ever a put of the law of nations? They might claim • right to blockade the porta of New York and Boston, and you thus invite America to blockade your ports. Theo what was to_ prevent a note of anarchy arising such as existed in the middle ages! Bat he understood that international law was intended to prevent such a state of :tr. If that decision of the Court of Exchequer was to this country would lose one of the safeguards for her commerce, for they might rest wand that no nation was so much interested in ioteroational law as England was. This was no doubt a digression from the subject which had Dees introduced, but it emu the noble lord's illogical statement which bad drawn him from the to irk. Again, the noble lord had said that the Federal agents had been enlisting in Ireland. Bathe (Mr. Cobden) would ask for a proof of thee He believed that it was • gross misrapreeestathar. and he charged the noble lord with exhi. biting gram ignorance upon the subject, for if he had read the bite-book he would have seen • contradiction by Mr. Adams of the statement made by Lord Russell o the same effect. Bat Mr. Adams had asked Lord Russell for proof, sad Lord Reuell was obliged to admit that he bad no pre of. What proof bad the noble 10-d opposite! Perhaps some newspaper paragraph. The subject of emigration from linked was one which bad been under discussion recently in that house, and the emigration row going on had been fully amounted for, and they had heard from the highest authority that people were too numerous in lrelard, that there was great distress in some places amongst them, and that they would be better off if they left and went to other countries. There was another great reason for this emigration, but which wee not generally known, and it was that within the last six months • law had been passed by of • most important character ; it was in agite bon for tea years, and it had at last become an set of the legislature, and was called the Homestead Law, and it grel6o acres of land to every head of a family for 400. (Hear, hem) Now, in America there were one thousand millions of cultivable land, enough to empty all France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Besides that new law is America, the high rate of wages given there was another menu for the emigration going on, and there fore he might, like Mr. Adams, challenge the noble lord to prove that tee recruiting sergeant bad been operating in Ireland. The assertions which had been made were roost vague, and ought not to have bean repeated in that house. He begged pardon for the digres sion, but he felt that the observations of the noble lord ought not to circulate there or elsewhere without contradic tion. The question of the prize courts in America might, he thought, be safely left in the hands of the law office: a of the crown. (Hear, hear.) Mr. S. FITZGERALD confessed that he regretted very much these continual discussions upon questions raised upon the capture of British vessels by American cruisers., because the result was that English ministers of state and English law decors were presented to the house in a novel position. (No, no.) Yes, in the position of defending every step take° by the American government, and of doing everything they could as far as speeches in that house sod another place were contented, to injure the cause of British merchants and to ignore what they possessed. (No, no.) The hen, member for Rochdale had always been a friend of the commercial classes, but he au now speaking against them and ignoring their rights is this great crisis. (" Hear, hear." and "Nor no.") The hon. gentleman had always been anxious to see belli gerent rights loosened, modified, and controlled ; bat he was now forced to come down and defend the mune taken by the British and American governments ; sod press those debts to an extent never heard of before, and urge new principles of international kw which had nos been known in former times. (Hear, bear.) The Americas government knew perfectly well that tbie trade, which had been de scribed by Lord Ruud' es legitimate, had become one of great impedes°, to the Confederate States, and therefore the American government did not care for the interests of Emeialimen, but were determined to put down that trade with • high hand, and run all risks and 000sequenosa The noble lord bad, in another place, the other evening, said that so long as he was at the Foreign-office no British subject should in any part of the world feel insecure in his person or property. That was *sentiment which did the noble lord 11000er ; but it would do him more honour were it made of usual and impartial application. He could not under- Mead the *obis lord luting that language in reference to per ,,eries who bed been shipwrecked on the coast of Brazil, sad lAA applying it to the case of the Petaled, for that ship was seized and detailed for three weeks before the British subject, on board were allowed to laud or to hold any wen- Ithineetina with the repressaktins of their ocustey. (Heim) Whew he (Mr. Fitzgerald) called the attention of the borne to • siabiaat similar to that now under easeideraties, the soldelead at the head of the government used a peculiar arpmeet which he (Mr. Fitzgerald) wield recommend to the notice of the hon. member for Rochdale. The noble lord depredated diecnesioe ea this subject, became there was ao power on the face of the globe that ahould desire the uteri/toe rather than the contraction of the belligerent =6-there was no power morsioterested is that than Eng -11.• (Mr. Fitigeraki) did not believe that to he • right and just doetrioa. He believed it lobe perfectly right that we should stand by the acknowledged principles of iaternatiosal law ; but he did not think it was for the iatereet of this great commercial country to see thole priociplas one whit extended beyond what the *aces 'Wee of the case had driven us to lay down in former yeast. And of this he was sure, that if we permitted those priociples of internatimal law to be adopted against us by the United States, or by any other power. the moment that we, regarded as we were by all the world with jealousy and mistrust, the moment we attempted to apply those Prin ciples we should find • lasso.) among °ther nations to pee r vest oar applying them, and we should find that we had only subjected our own ditizens to great loss and indignity, and that we should not have obtained our expected exten sion of belligerent rights. The amendment was then negatived without a division. Mr. B. COCHRANE brought under potion the report of the select committee on the diplomatic service, and urged the justice and propriety of carrying out the recommends. lions of the rept" and treaties the service more liberally. Mr. LA YARD said that all the recommendations of the committee had been acted epee, exeeptiog one only, and that was • quietest for the Chancellor of the Exehequer, and must depend upon the disposition of the home to in crease the grant of public money for the purpose. He ad mitted that the diplomatic service was oo the whole under paid, and stated that in the one of upwards of seventy con suls the salaries had bona increased. The motion led to some discuasion in which Mr. Massa, Mr. Dods" Sir M. Farquhar, and other members took Part ROYAL 00MIL9SION. The Speaker war summoned to the bar of the Boon of Lords to hear the royal assent given by commission to several bills, for which see report. MK ROEBUOK'S MOTION. Mr. MAGUIRE pre patios that be would move the following amendment on the motion of the boo. member for Sheffield for the recognition of the Confederate States : " That this house, witnessing with the deepest regret the lamentable mate of life which has characterised the struggle now carried on for now more than two years between the Northern and Southern States of America. and being de sirous of preventing the further effusion of blood, calls upon her MAjeety in the came of humanity, and io the interests of civilisation, to request the co-operation of the Emperor of the French in recommending an immediate armistice, so that the belligerente may have as opportunity of calmly eon sideriug the condition to which their country hes ban brought through the sacrifice of the best interests of peace to the pusioos engendered by civil war, and for the deciding on the adoption of such mutual arrangement and settlement as are suited to the actual position of affairs ; thereby itemised.* a contest the coationance of which, independent of the injury which it has indicted on large masses of the bidustnal population—the subjects of friendly powers—is viewed witli sorrow and apprehension by every civilised nation in the world." THE CIRCUITS. Mr. HADFIELD wished to ask the Attoroey-Genersl what progress wan makiog in the arraogement of new or additional eircuite, and when a report would be made to the house ; and whether any and what measures were takiug to relieve the judges from the excessive toil now imposed on them, by mesas of creating additional judges or other wise ; and, if Dot, what MIMI prevented the correction of an inconvenience to the public in the administration of justice. The ATTORNEY GENERAL said there was no commis sion on the subject, sod therefore tbere could be no report. It was not at present contemplated by the government to make any addition to the number of the judges. But it was hoped that such changes might be proposed as would have the effect of relieving the moral pressure of judicial basi l:MlL and enable the present pukes without being unduly taxed to administer justice in their respective circuits. Some alteration in the circuits would be desirable. This could not be done without the aid and interference of parliament, and a bill for this purpose would be brought forward in the present session, sod pressed tf there was a reasonable pro spect of its becoming law. AFFAIRS OF GREECE. Mr. S. FITZGERALD said there wu one subjeet to which he wished to call the attention of the Under Secre tary of State for Foreign Affairs. By the ►reaty signed in reference to the accesswe of Ring George to the three* of Greens the stun of 4,0001. wee to be surrendered by this country, in order that another sum of SAM/. might form a provision for the new soveneige. He wished to salt the right hoe. gentleman whether be woald be prepared testate the circumstances under whiob the 4.0001. a year was to be given np, awl the circumstances attending the cue roe roily, and whether the surrender wan to be made by the prerogative of the crown, or whether it was the intention of the government to bring the subject before the house, and to ask their assent to the surrender. Mr. LAYARD—I shall feel obliged 1/ the hon. gentleman will repeat him question to-morrow, as he hoe not given me notice of die intention to uk it. PROMOTION IN DOCKYARDS. Mr. FERRAND moved that there be Lid before the house a oopy of the Admiralty order as to the role d pro meta) in her Majesty's dockyards, limiting the age sad promotion of officer.. The return 111111 ordered. RUSSIA AND POLAND. Mr. HENNEFiiiiaaceil the IJ ad; flaWriary for 'Weirs Affairs whether any ooramunication had been received from St. Petersburg relative to the meat despatch of Earl Russell Mr. LA YARD—AII I can say in reply to the boa. mmo- WA question ia, that to the best of my knowledge the only intimation which has bees received ia, that the despatches from England, France, and Austria have been presented; but 1 em not aware that any answer has been received. PUBLIC WORKS (MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS) BILL. On the order of the day that this bill u emended be considered, Mr. BENTINCH inquired of Mr. Villiers whether he eon. aidered the security under which the money was to be advanced under this bill rendered It certain that the money would be ultimately repaid ; whether the distress in the manufacturing district. was not as much the result of overtrading as of a deficient eupply of cotton ; and whether, in hi opinion, the rouser. would be permanent cad pro vide a permanent remedy, or only a temporary expedient to be followed by other arearures. Mr. FERRAND eked what was to become of the enormous mass of unemployed factory operatives daring the ensuing winter, and who was to be responsible for their siwort. 111 r. VILLIPM, in reply to Mr. &intim*, said the Qom misaionen never advanud any money without examining the security. They had done so in this cue and were ea traded with it, and be believed it to be satisfactory. As to the cause of the distress, whether it was occasioned by over-trading, he did not think it his duty. he said. when he found greet distress existing, to inquire whether these poor people had been the victims of over-trading. He did not think this question quite pertinent. As to whether the bill would provide a permanent source of relief, it was a tem porary measure, intended to mitigate the distress, not in the hope that it would put an end to it. In answer to Mr. Pentad, he exßremsed his belief that there would be auffl cient funds dunoc the winter. Sir H. WILLOUGHBY called for explanations, which were given by the Chancellor of the &chequer. After some further disourioa the report wea &peed to with ameedmeote. SEIZURE OF BRITISH SHIPS BY THE FEDERAL& On the order of the day for • committee of supply, Mr. PEACOCK& roes to all the attention of the govern ment to the repeated seizures of our merchant vessels by the cruisers of the United States, and their subsequent ad' cation in the American prize courts. He wished to have from the government a definition of what they deemed to be lawful and legitimate teethe. He believed that a vessel sailing between neutral porta and under a neutral flag was engaged in legal tragic, whatever might be her cargo, and this doctrine was so clear that he should not have repeated it but for what bad recently been said on the subject by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in another The noble lord had said that the cruisers of the United States had seized the reseals without sufficient ioquiry, and that those reseals might really have been bound to Matamoros. If that were the case, the noble lord should know that they had beeo seized in violation of the well known principle to which he (Mr. Pescooke) had abided. If he understood the noble lord the government declined to go into the tom Da of each • kr age, sad was satisfied to abide by the decision of the America/ prise courts. It therefore became an important question to see how the law was administered in those courts. He must mann that be distrusted the decisions of those courts. The hon. gentleman concluded by moving for papers re- Istiog to the decisions of American prise courts at Key West The SOLICITOR.OENERAL said that if the boo. gentleman had moved for papers connected with any particular ship or any particular captain, her Majesty's government would willingly have considered whether the papers could, without iuommeeinceos, be placed on the table of the house. But when the hoe. gentleman moved for paper, is such general terms, it was impossible for bur Majesty's government to amede to the motion without aerial" inconvenience to goalies negotiations. The hon. gentleman roads en exceed ingly streets statement when he said that her Majesty's government repudiated the doctrine of damages. It me true that in one case they only demanded and in mother no damages at all. But why ? Simply became It would be idle and undignified to proceed diplomatically and ask for that which they knew they could not get, and which they could not insist on consistently with the practice of their own courts. Whenever there was a ease of . suspicion manifested by the ship' s own papers, the de iri a nom of her officers and crew, it had slimys been the prac tice of the courts of this country to hold it to be M their dis cretion to refuse both costa and damages. But if &leisure I were made where there was no concealment, no die guise, so prevarication, no falsehood, exempla r y damages ought to b e g i ven. The advice on which the government had acted was to manly as spinet ourselves and in favour of the United States, these principles of international law which we applied wheal other nations and in favour of ourselves in former wars. These were sometimes severe enough ; but if they were to be relaxed, they ought to be relaxed not in our own favour as neutrals, when they acquired their severity from the operation of our own courts at the time we were pried**, especially as the United States had followed oar law sad embodied its decisions into their own. (Hear, bear.) Lord R. CECIL eomplaioed that, in the American prim court., the captor was both pkiotiff and judge ; and said that, although we ought of course to listen to their dm'. sloes, it was neverthlas the boundea duty of the govern ment to watch them with special are. Not only had they inflicted injustice upon individuals, but they had made tn. reend,ats strides in the assumption of a right to capture peaceful traders. They had actually asserted that if a vessel left England to go to a neutral port, and there 1•1111 pr oof that it WU intended et that port to sell the vessel, remove the cargo, pay off the master and crew, sod euheequently use the vessel to run the blockade, a cruiser might seize and sell her. Mr. COBDEN said be found himself is rather a novel position, appearing, as he did, by implication, to take a part adverse to the interest of the British merchant sod ship owner, while the noble lord who had just sat down wathair champion sod advocate. With respect to blockades ex toadies over 2,W0 miles of comet, it was well known that be entertained so sympathy foe such proceedings. Such a mode of earivying on warfare, by which • greater amount of evli inflictM es neutrals the, on the belligerents themselves, might be ?bjlirled to on the ground of lateral Hs In net Wok that two maim siosaki reset. THE HUSH CHURCH. Coon the motion for going into committee of sup ply, the adjourned debate on the bon. member for Liskeard's motion with respect to the Irish church wee resumed by Mr. O. DUFF, who thought the country owed a debt of gratitude to the hon. member for Liskeard for bringieg this question nutter their consideration at the present time. The policy of the government with respect to the Irish church was the more monstrous sad intolerable because during the last thirty years we had been spying out the weak places in other nations. Like the Americans of the once United States we had been boasting of the par- faction of our institutions, and forgetting this great wrong, which might our day be to us, if we were not wise in time, what slavery had been to the Americans. He (Mr. Grant Duff) thought the cabs was one for which only cue remedy was fitted, and that was the remedy which Cato proposed for Certhege. (" Oh, oh," and cheers.) He would have the whole of the property of the Irish church applied for the benefit exclusively of Ireland ; but while it wee the interest of the state that the people should be moral and religion., it was not its interest that they should be taught this or that particular doctrine. Let the legislature do the righteous act for which be con tended and it would have gone a long way towards as psestig the Irish question. Ireland would then soon be ' and as loyal as Scotland, and they would have done more to increase the legitimate influence of England among the countries of Europe than would be done by twenty victories over a foreign foe. (Cheers.) Yr. P. DA Wf3ON deeply regretted that the attention of the house had been so much taken up recently with pole mical discussioes which tended to bnng the very name of their holy religion into disfavour. (Hear, bear.) It was impossible to deny that there were monodies connected with the different religious eodowmeata in Ireland ; but they were all so indissolubly bound together that if the govern. meet touched one the rest would fall, and in that fall would be involved the whole religion of the land. He was, there fors, equally opposed to the propositions of thebon.memben for Swansea, Peterborough, and Montrose. Sir R. PEEL, after some jocular remarks in reference to Mr. Osborne, said his boo. friend spoke of the diminution of the members of the protestant faith, which he said was dying out in Ireland. .But the fact was an increase of four soda half per cent. amongst the protestant', as compared with the Roman catholic. In 1834 there were 22 bishop, in Ireland who received 150,0001. But by the action of Lord Stanley 'sgovernment there were 10 bishoprics suppressed, and as he rid the income of the bishops was now 57,0001. a-year. In Ireland Were were 691,000 ophoopaliens, while there wee only church accommodation for 272,437. The hoe. gentleman contended that the Irish clergy were too highly paid, and he drew a comparison between the clergy in Eng land and Ireland and between their respective congregations. He stated that the average English parish contained 3,612 protestant", whereas the average Irish parish contained only 325. The boo. gentleman, however, in taking the Eoglish branch of the subject, included protestant' of all denomina tions—(hear, hear)—of whom disinters were more than one-third? What was the fact? In Eng. land there were 10,620 parishes, and the average num ber of parishioners of the established church in each was 589—while in Ireland the number was '3l. (Hear, hear.) But, said the hon. gentleman, the Irish clergy were over The sum distributed amongst the working clergy io Ireland was 320,0001. a year—a sum not equal to the cost of our armour-plated vessel. In Scotland, where the volun tary system prevailed, the clergy were paid at a much higher rata ; while the revenues of the church of England exceeded 4,000,0001., the number of worshippers being nine or ten millions. The English and the Irish branches of the united church could cot be separated. If the house determined to deal with the endowments of the one, they should deal with those of the other also. (Herr, bee".) It was very desirable to obtain information on the subject of the Irish church from those who from their positions were able to afford it, and he would therefore submit to the house the opinion of a chief authority of the Roman catholic church in Ireland, Archbishop Cullen. In May last Arch bishop Cullen published a letter addressed to his clergy, In which be stated that the income of the established church in Ireland was ten times as large in proportion as the income allowed for the maintenance of the clergy in any pit of the continent of Europe. He added that Russell and Lord Carlisle had denounced the m istime.) of that church, and naked, ' How can we enemas to ourselves the existence of an establishment which proclaims the Bible end nothing but the Bible es ite rule of faith, and gives to every one the right to think and act for himself in religious matter?" (Cheers.) Why those were precisely the grounds on which they stood by the established church. (Renewed cheering.) He (Sir R. Peel) knew no stronger answer that could be given to Dr. Cullen than the words used by the late F'rinoe Consort on that very subject. He said—" Not that we cannot reconcile ourselves to the existence of • church which had the Bible and nothing but the Bible se its rule of faith," but he said, " I have no fair of the church's safety and ultimate welfare, so long as she bolds fast to what our ancestors gained foe m at the Reformation —the Gospel, and the unfettered right to it. use." (Cheers.) He (Sir R. Peel) would confidently set the opinion of the late Prince Consort against that of Dr. Cullen. But Dr. Cullen said that the revenues of the established church in Ireland were ten times as large in proportion as the rams allowed for the maintenance of the clergy in any part of the continent. Directly after reading that statement he (Sir R. Peel) sent to Naples to ascartian which was founded in fact, and the result was most remarkable. The population of the Neapolitan States was 7.000,000, and to watch over the spiritual welfare of those levee millions there were 30 arch lAhopeHhear, hear)—and 77 bishops. There were 1,020 establishments for run, cordoning 13,611 monks, and eke 276 convents, and in feet he found by the authentic hi formation which he received from the government that the church in the Neapolitan States had actually in its service in 1860, 70,000 individuals. (Hear, hear.) And yet Dr. Cullen stated that the church of Ireland pos sessed ten times the revenue of any church on the continent. How was it at Rome itself ? The state of things there was still more remarkable. In the year 1840, for be had not been able to obtain later information, the population of Alm* amounted to 153,000 ; the number of ecclesiastics was s,273—that is, one out of every 29 of the population ; and there were 1,824 establishments for monks, and 612 convents. (Hear, bear.) There was one other subject to which, with the permission of the house, be would allude. The hon. gentleman had alluded to the fact that he (Sir R. Peel) bad attended a meeting in London with reference to the church in Ireland. He trusted he should always be prepared frankly and fairly to give explanations with reference to his conduct, politically and personally, when they were legitimately called for. He had cossetted his noble friend at the head of the government as to;whethwr he thought he had done wrong in attending the meeting in question, and the opinion of his noble friend was that he had not. (Hear, hear) He went to the meeting, not, as had been stated, for the purpose of aiding to make proselytes, but solely to listen to the statements made. When he saw in the requisition the names of the primates of England and of Ireland, and of one of the most ' eminent and distinguished members of the house, one who certainly would of being bigotted or intoleraat—he alluded to the hoo.Ond learned member for Belfast—thou, heart—he thought there could be no poesible harm in attending • meeting at which snch men were to take • part. What be (Sir It. Peel) stated on that occasion he was prepared to stand by. (Cheers.) It had reference roue particularly to the working I clergy of Ireland, and what he said must be acknowledged to I be the fact by all who had • knowledge of what was passing in Ireland. He stated that while many of the clergy had not rope for their abilities yet there were amongst them many shining lights, doing the missionary work out of which churches grew ; and this would be ad mitted by all who were coovertant with the exertion,' of i the Irish clergy. For his part he would infinitely prefer to sit below the gangway, and advocate what he believed to be the true internee of the country, than, for the sake of sitting on the treasury bench, abrogate one iota of that legitimate independence which every man in this country is , free to exercise, and which their parliamentary system was intended to interfere with. (Cheers.) He would not allude further to the subject than to say that he was sure the feeling of the house would be with him when he ex pressed his conviction that doing that which he thought for the benefit of the country with which he was politically con mired, could not in any way Ue construed into an offence against the government or the people. (Bear.) In his judgment the revenues of the Irish breath of the united church were not more than sufficient ; the clergy of that church wen deserving of the lumina at their disposal, and he therefore hoped the hour would adopt the view of the government, and negative the motion. It was impossible upon public grounds—riot to speak of the time at which it was brought forward—to assent to it. The hon. member proposed to deal with • subject the magnitude of which he had not sufficiently contemplated. The tender sapling might be transplanted, and grow in the *oil to which it was removed. but to upheave the ramifications of the oak, to lop its fair pmportioos end sunder its giant limbs, was • work which the skill and ingenuity of man could Dot successful]) accomplish. Se it was with the established church is Instead. It was act the growth of yeelindity ; it wee setalikked by the piety sad by the m ortices el our emessiors ; it wee semetimed by P arliament and by the coronation oath of the Sovereign—C. No sad the slit had been accepted and confirmed by generation altar oration • and therefore it preeseted a subject th e msguh of which did not appear to have been mown plated by the houourable member. He warned the house, that as attack upon the church in Ire- Lod would only be a prelioneary to an attack upon t lie he church ei t . t a b y li ss h b d . i filuitat" divide revenues of the church of Ireland amongst all dames of her Majesty's Inch subjects on ;13 immediately to be fol lowed lap by a motion for the alienation and eseularkatioe of the church establishment of England. (Hear, hear.) Hs would go seen further end my that they ought also to abolish all church endowments SOll to Adopt the voluntary system, which might work well in America, but which he did not wish to see replaos the system which bad endured in this country for so many generations. Bore he wee that if this question wee to be agitated again, it wee time far them frankly to avow their opinions and to choose their party for the struggle. (Loud cheers, and counter cheers.) la that ease ha, for one. should be found—acting, moreover, on the advice of his noble friend at the head of her Majesty's goverament—(ebeers, sad coasterebeere)— he should be found in the rinks of those who sat opposite, lumped to the defence of that principle which bad lasted for two centuries ; and God grant that it might long continue to be a centre of loyalty to the mown, sad a bulwark of our civil and religious liberties. (Loud cheers.) Mr. Henn and Mr. Hainsear rose together, and both were loudly called for, but eventually the Smoker decided is tamer of Mr. HENNESSY, who said that the right hoe. baronet had just made • statement which would attract great attention in Indeed, and which ought to be of some interest to the house. The right bon. gentleman said that before attending a roast meeting he had consulted the noble lord on the subject. Sir R. PEEL —I did not my that. What I said was, that when I saw that my attendance bad called forth remarks, I 'eked the noble lord if be thought I had done wrong, and he said, "Certain)y not." (Hem.) Mr. HENNESSY presumed, then, that the noble lord bad given the right bon. hareem" absolution. (Hear, harm) He might, at any sate, fairly assume that the Debi', brdseed the government were responsible for the conduct of the Chief Secretary for Ireland. It might be asked why it wee that war should be springing up again between the two great religious bodies in Ireland. Some light would 'op thrown on that matter by the proceedings of the West Conraught Missionary Society, the meeting of which bed been attended by the right hon. gentleman. It was at that meeting stated by the chairman, Mr. J. C. Cokjuhoun, the.: the object of the mission as to stir up strife in every parish in the west of Ireland. lie believed, however, that the mission was a loomed one, for the censorreport had ktesely been published, and it had struck • blow at the society from which it bad not yet recovered. The Bishop of Roches ter bad state d that 30,000 convert" had been made in West Connaught; and it was asserted on anonymous authority that Galway had positively become • protestant county. But • work published by the secretary et the society, under the title of "Good News from Ireland (from which the hon. member read copious extracts), showed that these statements were unfounded ; for it was full of complaint, respecting empty churches, and schools that were falling to pieces. He had never joined in any attack upon the church of Eng land, sod be rejoiced to say that on one occasion, when the Speaker gave a casting vote slimiest the abolition of the Church Rate Bill, one Roman catholic • member did not vote, and that was the hon. gentleman who was then addressing the house. At the meeting which had been alluded to it was said that the converts might be counted by tens of thousands, arid Dr. Wordsworth, in his Irish !demon, spoke of 30,000 con verts in West Connaught. Now, what was West Con naught? It comprised the western part of the counties of Galway and Mayo, and pert of the diocese of the Bebop of Teem. He found that the diocese in 1834 metaised 22,765 protegee* and in 1861 they had fallen off to 17,156, show ing • deduction of 25 per cent. That was to say, that while the decrease in the whole of Ireland had been 19 per cent., the decrease of protestant' in this particular diocese had been 25 per cent. The fact was that every year the protestant population of that district was declining. The hon. member then read • long extract from the Church Review, commenting with great severity on the conduct of the church missionaries, and concluded by deeiguating its proceedings as • fighting factions followed by • shriek for money. Sir H. CAIRNS replied et some length to the vv. manta adduced by Me Osborne. To the objection of that hon. member, that the revenues of the established church io Ireland were excemies in point of amount, having regard to the duty which her ministers were called on to perform, the hon. and leaned gentleman said that the set interne was not so much by 78,000 L a year as the amounts laid down in the seals published by Mr. Serjeaet Sheet. Without making any allowance for curates, the avenge receipts of each incumbent was 2101., whilst the sphere of duty was 20 square miles as compared with 5 miles in England. W as re gard to the statement that the Irish protestant clergy had in flocks, returns showed that there was an average of 1,590 epboOpalians in the town parishes of Ireland, and 376 in the rural parishes, as against 387 in England and 248 in Wales. As to the oases of noo-residence mentioned by the boo. member, having examined the facts be was prepared to state th at they were attributable to the circumstance that there was no glebe in the particular parishes referred to. He admitted that there were inequalities to be remedied and improvements effected ; it was not, however, by means of a motion such as this, but rather through the action of the heads of the church and the Ecclesiastical Commission, that that was to be accomplished. Sir G. GREY was unwilling to let the debate close with out answering the appeal which bad been made to the go vernment to state explicitly the course they would take with regard to the motion before the house. He confessed that be could not feel much enthusiasm for an ecclesiastical establishment founded for the benefit of • small minority, while no provision was made for the clergy of the great bulk of the people. (Cheers.) At the same time he could not consent to the subvention of the Irish church, and on that ground he should give the motion his unqualified opposition. He must say that be did not think that the hon. gentleman the member for Liskeard bad treated the house quite fairly. The hoe. member for Swamis had given notice of a motion reviving the old A • non Clause ; but the hon.member for Liskeard would not go that length, subsequent experience having apparently cooeincod him that it was wrong in principle or else impracticable. The object of the hon. member for Elgin was to abolish the church in Ireland and to sweep away the whole establish ment These were the wild notions they were asked to eotertain and to refer to • committee up stairs, without any guide whatever to inform them of the intentions of the house. The hon. member for Tipperary had distinctly put the same construction upon the speech of the honourable member for Liskeard, for be had said the Roman catholic* were determined to be placed upon an equality in Ireland. The motion before the house was ambiguous in terms, but bad been supported upon grounds directed to the total abolition of the church of Ireland. Whatever might have been the wisdom of statesmen in not making provision for the ma jority of the people, it was impossible now to get over that fact, end it could not be got rid of without inter fering with the strong feelings of the people in both countries. (Hear, hear.) He regretted that the pro position of Mr. Pitt was not acted upon when the incorpora tion of the two countries was carried out. At this day there were two great obstructions to it ; one the feeling which pervaded the people of this country, which would prevent any government from proposing it to par liament and the fact that Roman catholic' bad repudiated any such arrangement. Thie was • question, not of money, but of feel* The existence of an exclusive church without any provision being made for the majority_ of the people necessarily created dissatisfaction. The mo tion now made was very different to that made twenty-five years ago. The object then was to make ample provision for the !protestant clergy and to apply the surplus proceeds or the church towards the education of the people. That proposition was rejected, and since that period no progress bad been made for giviog it effect. But the government bad acted iudependently of it, and had passed the Tithe Act, by which other arrangement@ had been made. The whig party did not bring forward again the measures relating to the church io Ireland, but being in opposition they gave • hearty support to the measure of Sir R. Peel, by which the endowment of Maynootb was converted from an annual grant to a permanent grant, and this they did because they considered that was a just measure, though they lost many friends by it. He must say that to revive three discussions would only be bringiog about a renewal of seri monious disputes without soy beneScial result. He held himself absolved from voting in favour of this masers on I account of what he said 25 years ago, and he trusted that the hones would reject the motion. I Colonel GREVILLE moved the adjournment of the debate. (" Divide.") Mr. MONS.ELL tliought it would be hardly fair that each speeches es those of the Secretary for Ireland, of the hon. and learned gentleman opposite (Sir Hugh Cairn.), and of the Secretory for the Hume Department, should be allowed to pass without a reply. (Cries of " Adjourn," end" Divide., The house then divided on the question of a4 . l .) ournment For the adjournment Apiost . . 228-161 Mr. CANICIAN moved the adjournment of the house. Sir G. GREY said be had no objection to that motion, as it would have the effect of gettieg rid of the amend. meet on going into committee of supply. Mr. MONSELL would ask the indulgence of the hones while he attempted, to reply to some of the statements made that evening. (Cries of "Oh," and "Adjourn.") The speech of the Secretary for Ireland did not elicit a single mark of up. probation on his side of the house, while it was enthusiastic- ally cheered by members opposite, and this showed clearly what was the tendency of the opinions he had expressed. The right boo. baroset raid the tendency of the motion was to overthrow the established church of Ireland, but the hon. member for &ahead explained that he only desired to have • committee to investigate the present ecclesias tical establishment of Ireland, and he did not even say how the surplus revenue, if there was any, should be applied. He (Mr. Moosell) disclaimed soy intention to overthrow that church, which could only be accomplished by a revolution ; but he said that if there was any surplus it ought to be applied for the benefit°, the great body of the Irish What wall it in the cireumstasses of Ireland whni c t cheesed the opinions of these who sat on the Tteeeary bawds ? At the time whim they epee so strongly oL subject, formerly,elniost the whole of the catholic clergy a large body of the bishops were repealer& The Orgy diff MOD ear that at that time there was a powerful agitw ou Ireland ? headed by a powerful and th a t the gave meet yielded to fear what they now faded to yield to j tine. (hear, hoar.) He should certainly yore fa, motion. Mr. BCIILLY complained of the absence of the ankle lost at the, heed o f the government, and observed there was ale • very significant absence on the opposition side of tl.j ' house, the right Lon. member for Bucks not Lin, is h 7 Awe. The motion for the adjonrnment of the hone aas this put, and declared by the Speaker to be carried. Th e h ome eoce rdinely adjourned at 25 minutes to 3. SPORTING IN7'ISLLIGENCR. TATTEEBALL'B—MoNna T. Canaria:de maximy was again manifested to learn th nature of the diciniou in the Tomato ease before the " ful committee,* and there wu a very strong muster of boot makers and the leading patrons of the turf. The noblenie and gentlemen constituting the committee retired early 1, the afternoon to the old subscription -loom to make the unit Ligation, and the result of their deliberations wee Keane, with a degree of feeling which amounted to excitement Late in the afteroooo Admiral Rona appear.•,' on the Lwn, and to the astonishment of the crow• who immediately anrrouoded him , anuounced that committee had agreed to submit the question se to tL legality of re-openieg the case to a Queen's counsel. Tht the anticipated decision is again deferred. The matter t entirely ease:wed the attention of both beakers and laye that betting was almost entirely at a stand still, but aft, the committee delivered themselves of the above ultimatuc • little speculation took place, the following being ti quotations at the dose : CUMBERLAND . PLATE. sto 2 mitt Joey Jones, 5 yn, B.t 56 (t) LIVERPOOL - cur. 8 I. 1 br Os &M it) GOODWOOD STAKES. 10 to 1 opl Mr. B. MilKs inttaford, 5 yrs, ist 1 (takes) 10 to 1 Mr. Grorgles Anfield, 3 yrs, Est Glb (t) 12 to 1 Mr. T. Parr's Bloodm, 3 yrs, Gst 61b (t) 100 to 8 Mr. W. Day's essizonstUt, 3 yrs, Boit EP (taboo) 100 to 7 Lord Zetland's Zapstaado, 3 yrs, 6st Gib 100 to 6 Lord Stamford's Barchsttins, 3 yrs, fit t (takeo) 100 to 6 Mr. Ton Broork's Erenhand, 5 yra,1649 (taken) 0001)WOOD CCP. - • - _ 4 to 1 eget KZ A. de ife;tsToWe;y's L& Touc q ., 7t sto 1 Me li e b kokstoste, 4 yr., 9st nb sod ad) 6to 1 Mr. Cart w4ht'slrairwater, yrs, 9st 31b 7to 1 yr. T. Varies both*, 3 7n, 7st 31b (t) Even no the mares. ST. LEGER. 4to 1 apt Mr. Sari le's Ranger (off) Bto 1 Lord St. Vincent'. Lord Clifden freel• Bto 1 Mr. T. Valentine's Queen Bertha (off) 100 to 8 Lord Strathmore's Saccharometer (t) DERBY. 100 to 6 apt Lord Stamford's Cambosean (t) 1000 to 30 Baron Rothschild's Oalistacolt (t) 1000 to 30 Mr. T. Valentine's liallyfoz (t) 50 to 1 Lord Scarborough's Cceur de Lion (t) BETTING AT BIANCHESTER--IIioNDAT. CUMBERLAND PLATS. 3to 1 on The Field (off ) 7 to 2 apt Honest John (t) GOOD OOD STARER. 11 to 1 apt Bloodin (off) 12 to 1 Antiold (t sod off) 12 to 1 Knutdord 4t) 14 to 1 Consonette (off) 16 to 1 'Zopataado ft sad of) 16 to 1 Loiterer (off) 20 to 1 Beaman (t sad cdf) 25 to 1 EveLbaud (t) 25 to 1 Tholestris (1) 28 to 1 Balbom (t) 33 to 1 Borchottina (t) 33 to 1 Myttla (off) NAVAL AND MILITARY. ADMIRALTY, it;Ns 29. —APTOINT leartat E. T. kiamiltoe, to the Edinburgh. MARKE,7%S. .—Lie LONDON WEEKLY DOCK RETURNEL—JuNz 47. hippo Digiverd..Pr. Mock, 16t, 2,114 1,474 Val 1,248 1,886 248 162 1,802 1,611 226 644 1,211 664 646 220 easAs—W. I. hhils lttaes I 4 - silidis -~i 3,9/31 26,e10 1,8312 :~~.i 4,444 6.601 =9SMalaosado casks' Do packages' 009M—W.I. _package.' 769 Do..brla & bags" Cei o loa (ask.' 2.286 briar!: Dew 7,966 Hooka packsgaa Other K. India packages 11119 Do. do. —Naas, Brazil & Costa Rica bags: 3.014 0000 A . l.4a 2,145 babes WWI Bag casks! 1.1119 66,171 141,420 146,00 1,064 461,942 6,166 — Do. --..., .... BM LI So WuLi ul 614 SLUMS.' Nrnun 01 ?OTANI 1001 17 41,00 S 93,861 10,9811 31,60) 10;r07 19.110 17,275 31,C1N KOS& 46.416 TALLOW.—MONDLY Roraima. ThB tallow marl closed firmly last week, under the infinoseit of the rumours which have been in circulation. Today there more calmeesa in the political atmosphere, and the marl is consequently a little weaker, the full prices of last we not being maintained. FriAn St. Petersburg shipments proceeding, though slowly. Our closing prices are :-111 sod all July, 43a. ; August and September ' new talk 445. 6d. ; October to December, 41s. 9d. to 465. ; to tallow, 4k tid., net cash ; North American, 41s. 6d. to 4 South , good q American, 425. to 425. 6d Ist pips 41a. 6d.. 2od quality ; American beef, 40s. 415.. good a fine. Cocoalaut oil steady. Cochin, 47a ; Coyloo, 44, Sydney, 41s. to 42a., middling and good kinds. Palm steady, 36a. boa Lagos. Palm nut oil, 355, to 26a klof gnaw, 345. to 335. • rough fat, 2 a lid.—(From the Circa of Mears. Smith n od Charles.) COTTON.—UVIRPOOL, JUNI 29.—We have had a go demand to-day with a more regular and firmer market. prices obtained are rather in advance of Saturday, and ' close with a hardening tendency. The sales are 5,000 halt of which 2,000 are for expoit and speculation. CATTLE. —LivaaPooL, JUNE 29.—The supply of do is much the same u last Monday. A slow sale for bed, lower prior. Sheep sold at full prices. Lamb soW low, Beef, sid. to lid. ; mutton, 6}41. to 74d. per lb. ; 'mut 21s. to - 375. each. Cattle at market, 1,9 Z) ; sheep, 10,348 COALS. LONDON, JUNI 29.—Byam's Beboide W. Hartley, 15a. 6d. ; Davidaeo's West Hartley. 150. lid Lambert's West Hartley, 15s. 34. ; Wylaui, 15s. Gd Eden Male, ; Walls Eod Braddylls Hetam, 150. 3.1 Walls Eod Frainwellgate, 14s. lid. ; Walls End Hotta 17s. ; Walla End Kepler Grange, 14s. 9d. ; Walla E , Kussel's Hettoo, 15a. 34L ; Walls End Tunstall, lio. 6d Walls End Casaop, 15.. G4l. ; W. E. Caradoe. 16e. ; We End Hartlepool, His. Gd. ; Walls End Haugh Ha 11,154494.1 Walls End Kelloe, 15e. 941. ; Walls Eod South Ka 15s. 9d. ; Walls Eod Trimdou Hartlepool, 16s. W. ; C. way and Darya Malting, 19a. 64.—Ships at market, :a sold, 39. [Advertisement. —HOLLOWAT'S Pima and Ola frequent cause of gout and rheumatism is the inda: notary state of the blood, attenied with bad diimation general debility. A few does of these pills taken in time ere effectual preventative against gout and rheumatism. but Info who has an attack of either should use Holloways olutme oleo. the powerful properties of which, combined with the Oft of the pills, must infallibly effect a cure. These pills art divert on the blood which they purify and Improve, they also reitul. the secretions and give tone to the stomach. and thus the shi system is Invigorated and pu: into is couditiou which enable& to throw off disease or check its approach. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATBS. BIRTH& DAINTA—Jane ta, at Thurlee.pare, the wife of Dr. M Baja, of awn. 11101 NETT - lase 2S, at Palace•gardemterrace, Kensingtoo Mrs. J. Barnett, of a daughter. SHORT.—Juile 25, at St. Gomaiteroad, Pimlico, the alto of 3 Short, lag., of a son. WARRIAOLS. DICK INSON—DICK NSON. —Jam 25, A t Sandurstead, Sure t V the B. J. H. Randolph, I.slptain W. Dickinson, of hr ajey's Bombay Staff Corr, to Laura, daughter of J. I Iffeatmon, Neu of Purley LtaIOO. Scar Hoyden. HAW KlNS—SlatiN.—June 25,George a, Stmlthwark. J. T. B. J. Haw/him to Sarah daughtm of the late is J. Moon, of 0111141(0rd. SMITH—PALSIKIL—June at et. Saviour's, Bath, by the H o W. H. Pritchett, IA A . thu Her. K. Beath, 111 A.. of Drama , College, Oxford. t Han. daughter of T. Psalm, Let . • Walbridge, Bath. DEATHS. DlXON.—June U. at Ciliton.park. Biskeuhead. the Res. J. r Dixon, W.A., aged 47 HOW.—June 25. at Basingstoke, L. How. Eq., aged et. Li LACHEUR —June 07. at Olosseesterassail, Regents - Pen W. Le Lasheus. Ken used Oa. TAYLOIL—.7sine t'S. at •-• Sag., aged 77, lallagtoa, W. TA7l,‘ --•- - Prlnted and rubliolud waiwi K lAI 011 16 2 tu th• City A lark& ' , WIC (us., IntribaNl4trast, Is the Pryd WhltAtiants Tvziu.aT, JUNK W. UAL QM.