update:readme

Datasets-Construction/OpenSWI-real/CSRM/01_CSRM_Real.ipynb

@@ -809,14 +809,14 @@
     "from cartopy.io.shapereader import Reader\n",
     "import matplotlib as mpl\n",
     "sys.path.append(\"/home/bingxing2/ailab/scxlab0055/project/04_Inversion/SurfWaveInv/DispFormer-local/\")\n",
-    "from DispFormer.plots import load_cpt\n",
+    "from SWInversion.plots import load_cpt\n",
     "\n",
     "# Load custom shapefile for coastlines\n",
-    "custom_shapefile_path =\"/home/bingxing2/ailab/scxlab0055/project/04_Inversion/SurfWaveInv/DispFormer-local/DispFormer/plot_source/ne_110m_admin_0_countries/ne_110m_admin_0_countries.shx\"\n",
+    "custom_shapefile_path =\"/home/bingxing2/ailab/scxlab0055/project/04_Inversion/SurfWaveInv/DispFormer-local/SWInversion/plot_source/ne_110m_admin_0_countries/ne_110m_admin_0_countries.shx\"\n",
     "coastline_feature = ShapelyFeature(Reader(custom_shapefile_path).geometries(), ccrs.PlateCarree())\n",
     "\n",
     "# load the colormap from GMT\n",
-    "cpt_file = \"/home/bingxing2/ailab/scxlab0055/project/04_Inversion/SurfWaveInv/DispFormer-local/DispFormer/plot_source/GMT_panoply.cpt\"\n",
+    "cpt_file = \"/home/bingxing2/ailab/scxlab0055/project/04_Inversion/SurfWaveInv/DispFormer-local/SWInversion/plot_source/GMT_panoply.cpt\"\n",
     "cmap = load_cpt(cpt_file,num_colors=20,reverse=True)\n",
     "\n",
     "\n",

Datasets-Construction/OpenSWI-shallow/0.2-10s-Aug/Data-statistic.ipynb

@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "from DispFormer.dispersion import *\n",
+    "from SWInversion.dispersion import *\n",
     "\n",
     "idx = 1000000\n",
     "\n",
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "from DispFormer.dispersion import *\n",
+    "from SWInversion.dispersion import *\n",
     "new_vel_model_temp = new_vel_model_temp.astype(np.float64)\n",
     "t = generate_mixed_samples(num_samples=100,start=0.5,end=10,uniform_num=30,log_num=30,random_num=40)\n",
     "disp_res = calculate_dispersion(new_vel_model_temp,t=t,dc=0.001)\n",

Datasets-Construction/OpenSWI-shallow/0.2-10s-Base/Data-statistic.ipynb

@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "from DispFormer.dispersion import *\n",
+    "from SWInversion.dispersion import *\n",
     "\n",
     "idx = 1000000\n",
     "\n",
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "from DispFormer.dispersion import *\n",
+    "from SWInversion.dispersion import *\n",
     "new_vel_model_temp = new_vel_model_temp.astype(np.float64)\n",
     "t = generate_mixed_samples(num_samples=100,start=0.5,end=10,uniform_num=30,log_num=30,random_num=40)\n",
     "disp_res = calculate_dispersion(new_vel_model_temp,t=t,dc=0.001)\n",

Datasets/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
+<h1 align="center">OpenSWI: A Massive-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Surface Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion</h1>
+<h5 align="center">Feng Liu, Sijie Zhao, Xinyu Gu, Fenghua Lin, Yaxing Li*, Rui Su*, Jianping Huang, Lei Bai</h5>
+
+### Source of the OpenSWI
+
+<table>
+<thead>
+<tr>
+  <th>Group</th>
+  <th>Reference</th>
+  <th>Datasets</th>
+  <th>Geological Feature/Cover Region</th>
+  <th>Model Variable</th>
+  <th>Model Size</th>
+</tr>
+</thead>
+<tbody>
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="5">OpenSWI-shallow</td>
+  <td rowspan="5">Deng et al., 2021</td>
+  <td>OpenFWI-FlatVelA</td>
+  <td>Flat</td>
+  <td>vp</td>
+  <td>30,000 x 1 x 70 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Flat-FaultA</td>
+  <td>Flat + Fault</td>
+  <td>vp</td>
+  <td>54,000 x 1 x 70 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-CurveVel</td>
+  <td>Fold</td>
+  <td>vp</td>
+  <td>30,000 x 1 x 70 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Fold-Fault</td>
+  <td>Fold + Fault</td>
+  <td>vp</td>
+  <td>54,000 x 1 x 70 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-StyleA</td>
+  <td>Field</td>
+  <td>vp</td>
+  <td>67,000 x 1 x 70 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="14">OpenSWI-deep</td>
+  <td>Pasyanos et al., 2014</td>
+  <td>LITHO1.0</td>
+  <td>Global</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>40,962 x 2 x 96</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Xin et al., 2018</td>
+  <td>USTClitho1.0</td>
+  <td>China</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>9,125 x 2 x 12</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Shen et al., 2013</td>
+  <td>Central-and-Western US</td>
+  <td>Central and Western US</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>6,803 x 2 x 72</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Shen et al., 2016</td>
+  <td>Continental China</td>
+  <td>China</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>4,516 x 2 x 400</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Xie et al., 2018</td>
+  <td>US Upper-Mantle</td>
+  <td>American</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>3,678 x 2 x 600</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Lu et al., 2018</td>
+  <td>EUcrust</td>
+  <td>European</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>43,520 x 2 x 80</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Berg et al., 2020</td>
+  <td>Alaska</td>
+  <td>Alaska</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>19,408 x 2 x 156</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Blom et al., 2020; Fichtner et al., 2018; Çubuk-Sabuncu et al., 2017</td>
+  <td>CSEM-Europe</td>
+  <td>European</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>21,931 x 3 x 61</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Blom et al., 2020; Fichtner et al., 2018</td>
+  <td>CSEM-Eastmed</td>
+  <td>Eastern Mediterranean</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>12,782 x 3 x 81</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Fichtner et al., 2018; Fichtner et al., 2015</td>
+  <td>CSEM-Iberian</td>
+  <td>Iberian (Western Mediterranean)</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>9,102 x 3 x 81</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Fichtner et al., 2018; Colli et al., 2013</td>
+  <td>CSEM-South Atlantic</td>
+  <td>South Atlantic</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>7,371 x 3 x 51</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Fichtner et al., 2018; Krischer et al., 2018</td>
+  <td>CSEM-North Atlantic</td>
+  <td>North Atlantic</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>14,541 x 3 x 51</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Fichtner et al., 2018; Simutė et al., 2016</td>
+  <td>CSEM-Japan</td>
+  <td>Japanese Islands</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>14,641 x 3 x 61</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Fichtner et al., 2018; Fichtner et al., 2010</td>
+  <td>CSEM-Astralasia</td>
+  <td>Australasian</td>
+  <td>depth, vsv, vsh</td>
+  <td>4,131 x 3 x 51</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="2">OpenSWI-real</td>
+  <td>Fu et al., 2022</td>
+  <td>LongBeach</td>
+  <td>American</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>5,297 x 2 x 241</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Xiao et al., 2024</td>
+  <td>CSRM</td>
+  <td>Continental China</td>
+  <td>depth, vs</td>
+  <td>12,901 x 2 x 145</td>
+</tr>
+</tbody>
+</table>
+
+---
+
+### Details of OpenSWI
+<table>
+<thead>
+<tr>
+  <th>Group</th>
+  <th>Datasets</th>
+  <th>Period Range (s)</th>
+  <th>Depth Range and Interval (km)</th>
+  <th>Extracted 1D Velocity</th>
+  <th>Augmented 1D Velocity</th>
+</tr>
+</thead>
+<tbody>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="5">OpenSWI-shallow</td>
+  <td>OpenFWI-FlatVelA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>30,000 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>1,490,415 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Flat-FaultA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>292,941 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>2,925,151 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-CurveVel</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>295,773 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>2,952,975 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Fold-Fault</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>537,774 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>5,369,692 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-StyleA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>2,344,958 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>9,345,103 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="14">OpenSWI-deep</td>
+  <td>LITHO1.0</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>40,959 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>245,771 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>USTClitho1.0</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>9,125 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>54,750 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Central-and-Western US</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>6,803 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>40,818 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Continental China</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>4,516 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>27,096 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>US Upper-Mantle</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>3,678 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>22,061 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>EUcrust</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>43,520 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>261,155 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Alaska</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>19,408 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>116,448 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Europe</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>21,931 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>131,586 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Eastmed</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>12,782 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>76,692 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Iberian</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>9,102 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>54,612 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-South Atlantic</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>7,371 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>44,226 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-North Atlantic</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>14,541 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>87,246 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Japan</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>14,641 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>87,846 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Astralasia</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>4,131 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>24,786 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="2">OpenSWI-real</td>
+  <td>LongBeach</td>
+  <td>0.263 - 1.666 s</td>
+  <td>0-1.4 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>5,297 x 4 x 35</td>
+  <td>-</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSRM</td>
+  <td>8 - 70 s</td>
+  <td>0-120 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>12,901 x 4 x 120</td>
+  <td>-</td>
+</tr>
+
+</tbody>
+</table>
+
+---
+
+### Reference
+
+1. **X. Xiao et al.**, "CSRM‐1.0: A China Seismological Reference Model," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 129, no. 9, p. e2024JB029520, Sept. 2024, [doi: 10.1029/2024JB029520](https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB029520).
+   
+2. **L. Fu et al.**, "Improved high‐resolution 3D vs model of Long Beach, CA: Inversion of multimodal dispersion curves from ambient noise of a dense array," *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, vol. 49, no. 4, p. e2021GL097619, Feb. 2022, [doi: 10.1029/2021GL097619](https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097619).
+  
+3. **C. Deng et al.**, “OpenFWI: Large-scale multi-structural benchmark datasets for full waveform inversion,” *Neural Information Processing Systems*, Nov. 2021, Accessed: Feb. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d13799dcbd0aefb08c379f58cd6004b1376ca33](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d13799dcbd0aefb08c379f58cd6004b1376ca33)
+
+4. **N. Blom et al.**, "Seismic waveform tomography of the central and eastern Mediterranean upper mantle," *Solid Earth*, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 669–690, Apr. 2020, [doi: 10.5194/se-11-669-2020](https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-669-2020).
+   
+5. **E. M. Berg et al.**, "Shear velocity model of Alaska via joint inversion of Rayleigh wave ellipticity, phase velocities, and receiver functions across the Alaska transportable array," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 125, no. 2, Feb. 2020, [doi: 10.1029/2019jb018582](https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jb018582).
+
+6. **H. Xin et al.**, "High‐resolution lithospheric velocity structure of continental China by double‐difference seismic travel‐time tomography," *Seismol. Res. Lett.*, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 229–241, Jan. 2019, [doi: 10.1785/0220180209](https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180209).
+
+7. **J. Xie et al.**, "3-D upper-mantle shear velocity model beneath the contiguous United States based on broadband surface wave from ambient seismic noise," *Pure Appl. Geophys.*, vol. 175, no. 10, pp. 3403–3418, Oct. 2018, [doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2).
+
+8. **Y. Lu et al.**, "High-resolution surface wave tomography of the European crust and uppermost mantle from ambient seismic noise," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 1136–1150, Aug. 2018, [doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy188](https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy188).
+
+9. **L. Krischer et al.**, "Automated large‐scale full seismic waveform inversion for North America and the North Atlantic," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 5902–5928, July 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2017JB015289](https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015289).
+
+10. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "The collaborative seismic earth model: generation 1," *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 4007–4016, May 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2018gl077338](https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077338).
+
+11. **Y. Çubuk-Sabuncu et al.**, "3-D crustal velocity structure of western Turkey: constraints from full-waveform tomography," *Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.*, vol. 270, pp. 90–112, Sept. 2017, [doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014).
+
+12. **S. Simutė et al.**, "Full‐waveform inversion of the Japanese islands region," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 3722–3741, May 2016, [doi: 10.1002/2016jb012802](https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb012802).
+
+13. **W. Shen et al.**, "A seismic reference model for the crust and uppermost mantle beneath China from surface wave dispersion," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 954–979, Aug. 2016, [doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw175](https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw175).
+
+14. **A. Fichtner and A. Villaseñor**, "Crust and upper mantle of the western Mediterranean – constraints from full-waveform inversion," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 428, pp. 52–62, Oct. 2015, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.038](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.038).
+
+15. **M. E. Pasyanos et al.**, "LITHO1.0: An updated crust and lithospheric model of the Earth," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 2153–2173, Mar. 2014, [doi: 10.1002/2013JB010626](https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010626).
+
+16. **W. Shen et al.**, "A 3‐D model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the Central and Western US by joint inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 262–276, Jan. 2013, [doi: 10.1029/2012JB009602](https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009602).
+
+17. **F. Rickers et al.**, "The Iceland–Jan Mayen plume system and its impact on mantle dynamics in the North Atlantic region: evidence from full-waveform inversion," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 367, pp. 39–51, Apr. 2013, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.022](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.022).
+
+18. **L. Colli et al.**, "Full waveform tomography of the upper mantle in the South Atlantic region: imaging a westward fluxing shallow asthenosphere?," *Tectonophysics*, vol. 604, pp. 26–40, Sept. 2013, [doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.015](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.015).
+
+19. **C. Trabant et al.**, "Data products at the IRIS DMC: stepping stones for research and other applications," *Seismol. Res. Lett.*, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 846–854, Sept. 2012, [doi: 10.1785/0220120032](https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120032).
+
+20. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "Full waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure: new insights into present and past states of the Australasian upper mantle," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 290, no. 3–4, pp. 270–280, Feb. 2010, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.003).
+
+21. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 1703–1725, Dec. 2009, [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04368.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04368.x).

README.md

@@ -11,7 +11,10 @@ size_categories:
 viewer: false
 ---
 
-# 🌍 **OpenSWI: A Massive Surface-Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion Benchmark Dataset**
+<h1 align="center">OpenSWI: A Massive-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Surface Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion</h1>
+<h5 align="center"><a href="https://liufeng2317.github.io/">Feng Liu</a>, Sijie Zhao, Xinyu Gu, Fenghua Lin, Yaxing Li*, Rui Su*, Jianping Huang, Lei Bai</h5>
+
+![](./Figure/Figure1.png)
 
 ## 📖 **Overview**
 
@@ -25,7 +28,178 @@ These datasets are ideal for training and evaluating deep learning models focuse
 
 ---
 
-## 📊 **Datasets**
+## 📊 **OpenSWI Datasets**
+
+<table>
+<thead>
+<tr>
+  <th>Group</th>
+  <th>Datasets</th>
+  <th>Period Range (s)</th>
+  <th>Depth Range and Interval (km)</th>
+  <th>Extracted 1D Velocity</th>
+  <th>Augmented 1D Velocity</th>
+</tr>
+</thead>
+<tbody>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="5"><a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/LiuFeng2317/OpenSWI/tree/main/Datasets/OpenSWI-shallow/0.2-10s-Aug">OpenSWI-shallow</a></td>
+  <td>OpenFWI-FlatVelA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>30,000 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>1,490,415 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Flat-FaultA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>292,941 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>2,925,151 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-CurveVel</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>295,773 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>2,952,975 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-Fold-Fault</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>537,774 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>5,369,692 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>OpenFWI-StyleA</td>
+  <td>0.1-10 s</td>
+  <td>0-2.8 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>2,344,958 x 4 x 70</td>
+  <td>9,345,103 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="14"><a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/LiuFeng2317/OpenSWI/tree/main/Datasets/OpenSWI-deep/homo-thickness-aug">OpenSWI-deep</a></td>
+  <td>LITHO1.0</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>40,959 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>245,771 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>USTClitho1.0</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>9,125 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>54,750 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Central-and-Western US</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>6,803 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>40,818 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Continental China</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>4,516 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>27,096 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>US Upper-Mantle</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>3,678 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>22,061 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>EUcrust</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>43,520 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>261,155 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>Alaska</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>19,408 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>116,448 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Europe</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>21,931 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>131,586 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Eastmed</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>12,782 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>76,692 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Iberian</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>9,102 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>54,612 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-South Atlantic</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>7,371 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>44,226 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-North Atlantic</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>14,541 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>87,246 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Japan</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>14,641 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>87,846 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td>CSEM-Astralasia</td>
+  <td>1-100 s</td>
+  <td>0-300 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>4,131 x 4 x 300</td>
+  <td>24,786 x 4 x 70</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr>
+  <td rowspan="2"><a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/LiuFeng2317/OpenSWI/tree/main/Datasets/OpenSWI-real/">OpenSWI-real</a></td>
+  <td><a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/LiuFeng2317/OpenSWI/tree/main/Datasets/OpenSWI-real/LongBeach">LongBeach</a></td>
+  <td>0.263 - 1.666 s</td>
+  <td>0-1.4 km / 0.04 km</td>
+  <td>5,297 x 4 x 35</td>
+  <td>-</td>
+</tr>
+<tr>
+  <td><a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/LiuFeng2317/OpenSWI/tree/main/Datasets/OpenSWI-real/CSRM">CSRM</a></td>
+  <td>8 - 70 s</td>
+  <td>0-120 km / 1.0 km</td>
+  <td>12,901 x 4 x 120</td>
+  <td>-</td>
+</tr>
+
+</tbody>
+</table>
+
+> Details of the source of datasets can be found at [OpenSWI](./Datasets/README.md)
 
 ### 🏞️ **OpenSWI-Shallow**
 
@@ -89,9 +263,30 @@ These models provide a comprehensive representation of both regional and global
   * The **period range** for these curves is **8 to 70 seconds**, ideal for studying deeper geological structures.
   * Data is sourced from a dense network of seismic stations across mainland China, offering comprehensive coverage for advanced inversion tasks.
 
----
+
+----
+
+## 📚 **Citation**
+
+If you use this dataset in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@article{liufeng_2025_openswi,
+  title={OpenSWI: A Massive-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Surface Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion},
+  author={Feng Liu, Sijie Zhao},
+  year={2025},
+}
+```
+
+----
+
+
+## 📝 **License**
+
+Released under the **CC BY 4.0 License**. See the full license in the repository.
 
 
+---
 ## 🔍 **Reference**
 <details>
 <summary>Click to expand related works</summary>
@@ -99,39 +294,44 @@ These models provide a comprehensive representation of both regional and global
 1. **X. Xiao et al.**, "CSRM‐1.0: A China Seismological Reference Model," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 129, no. 9, p. e2024JB029520, Sept. 2024, [doi: 10.1029/2024JB029520](https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JB029520).
    
 2. **L. Fu et al.**, "Improved high‐resolution 3D vs model of Long Beach, CA: Inversion of multimodal dispersion curves from ambient noise of a dense array," *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, vol. 49, no. 4, p. e2021GL097619, Feb. 2022, [doi: 10.1029/2021GL097619](https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097619).
+  
+3. **C. Deng et al.**, “OpenFWI: Large-scale multi-structural benchmark datasets for full waveform inversion,” *Neural Information Processing Systems*, Nov. 2021, Accessed: Feb. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d13799dcbd0aefb08c379f58cd6004b1376ca33](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d13799dcbd0aefb08c379f58cd6004b1376ca33)
+
+4. **N. Blom et al.**, "Seismic waveform tomography of the central and eastern Mediterranean upper mantle," *Solid Earth*, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 669–690, Apr. 2020, [doi: 10.5194/se-11-669-2020](https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-669-2020).
    
-3. **N. Blom et al.**, "Seismic waveform tomography of the central and eastern Mediterranean upper mantle," *Solid Earth*, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 669–690, Apr. 2020, [doi: 10.5194/se-11-669-2020](https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-669-2020).
-   
-4. **E. M. Berg et al.**, "Shear velocity model of Alaska via joint inversion of Rayleigh wave ellipticity, phase velocities, and receiver functions across the Alaska transportable array," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 125, no. 2, Feb. 2020, [doi: 10.1029/2019jb018582](https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jb018582).
+5. **E. M. Berg et al.**, "Shear velocity model of Alaska via joint inversion of Rayleigh wave ellipticity, phase velocities, and receiver functions across the Alaska transportable array," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 125, no. 2, Feb. 2020, [doi: 10.1029/2019jb018582](https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jb018582).
 
-5. **H. Xin et al.**, "High‐resolution lithospheric velocity structure of continental China by double‐difference seismic travel‐time tomography," *Seismol. Res. Lett.*, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 229–241, Jan. 2019, [doi: 10.1785/0220180209](https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180209).
+6. **H. Xin et al.**, "High‐resolution lithospheric velocity structure of continental China by double‐difference seismic travel‐time tomography," *Seismol. Res. Lett.*, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 229–241, Jan. 2019, [doi: 10.1785/0220180209](https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180209).
 
-6. **J. Xie et al.**, "3-D upper-mantle shear velocity model beneath the contiguous United States based on broadband surface wave from ambient seismic noise," *Pure Appl. Geophys.*, vol. 175, no. 10, pp. 3403–3418, Oct. 2018, [doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2).
+7. **J. Xie et al.**, "3-D upper-mantle shear velocity model beneath the contiguous United States based on broadband surface wave from ambient seismic noise," *Pure Appl. Geophys.*, vol. 175, no. 10, pp. 3403–3418, Oct. 2018, [doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1881-2).
 
-7. **Y. Lu et al.**, "High-resolution surface wave tomography of the European crust and uppermost mantle from ambient seismic noise," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 1136–1150, Aug. 2018, [doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy188](https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy188).
+8. **Y. Lu et al.**, "High-resolution surface wave tomography of the European crust and uppermost mantle from ambient seismic noise," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 1136–1150, Aug. 2018, [doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy188](https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy188).
 
-8. **L. Krischer et al.**, "Automated large‐scale full seismic waveform inversion for North America and the North Atlantic," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 5902–5928, July 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2017JB015289](https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015289).
+9. **L. Krischer et al.**, "Automated large‐scale full seismic waveform inversion for North America and the North Atlantic," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 5902–5928, July 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2017JB015289](https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015289).
 
-9. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "The collaborative seismic earth model: generation 1," *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 4007–4016, May 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2018gl077338](https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077338).
+10. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "The collaborative seismic earth model: generation 1," *Geophys. Res. Lett.*, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 4007–4016, May 2018, [doi: 10.1029/2018gl077338](https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077338).
 
-10. **Y. Çubuk-Sabuncu et al.**, "3-D crustal velocity structure of western Turkey: constraints from full-waveform tomography," *Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.*, vol. 270, pp. 90–112, Sept. 2017, [doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014).
+11. **Y. Çubuk-Sabuncu et al.**, "3-D crustal velocity structure of western Turkey: constraints from full-waveform tomography," *Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.*, vol. 270, pp. 90–112, Sept. 2017, [doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2017.06.014).
 
-...
+12. **S. Simutė et al.**, "Full‐waveform inversion of the Japanese islands region," *J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth*, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 3722–3741, May 2016, [doi: 10.1002/2016jb012802](https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb012802).
 
-</details>
+13. **W. Shen et al.**, "A seismic reference model for the crust and uppermost mantle beneath China from surface wave dispersion," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 954–979, Aug. 2016, [doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw175](https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw175).
 
-## 📚 **Citation**
+14. **A. Fichtner and A. Villaseñor**, "Crust and upper mantle of the western Mediterranean – constraints from full-waveform inversion," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 428, pp. 52–62, Oct. 2015, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.038](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.038).
 
-If you use this dataset in your research, please cite:
+15. **M. E. Pasyanos et al.**, "LITHO1.0: An updated crust and lithospheric model of the Earth," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 2153–2173, Mar. 2014, [doi: 10.1002/2013JB010626](https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010626).
 
-```bibtex
-@article{liufeng_2025_openswi,
-  title={OpenSWI: A Massive Surface-Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion Benchmark Dataset},
-  author={Feng Liu, Sijie Zhao},
-  year={2025},
-}
-```
+16. **W. Shen et al.**, "A 3‐D model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the Central and Western US by joint inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion," *JGR Solid Earth*, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 262–276, Jan. 2013, [doi: 10.1029/2012JB009602](https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009602).
 
-## 📝 **License**
+17. **F. Rickers et al.**, "The Iceland–Jan Mayen plume system and its impact on mantle dynamics in the North Atlantic region: evidence from full-waveform inversion," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 367, pp. 39–51, Apr. 2013, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.022](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.022).
 
-Released under the **CC BY 4.0 License**. See the full license in the repository.
+18. **L. Colli et al.**, "Full waveform tomography of the upper mantle in the South Atlantic region: imaging a westward fluxing shallow asthenosphere?," *Tectonophysics*, vol. 604, pp. 26–40, Sept. 2013, [doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.015](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.015).
+
+19. **C. Trabant et al.**, "Data products at the IRIS DMC: stepping stones for research and other applications," *Seismol. Res. Lett.*, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 846–854, Sept. 2012, [doi: 10.1785/0220120032](https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120032).
+
+20. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "Full waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure: new insights into present and past states of the Australasian upper mantle," *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.*, vol. 290, no. 3–4, pp. 270–280, Feb. 2010, [doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.12.003).
+
+21. **A. Fichtner et al.**, "Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods," *Geophys. J. Int.*, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 1703–1725, Dec. 2009, [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04368.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04368.x).
+
+
+</details>