commit files to HF hub

prompts.jsonl

@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nThe assistant's response does not provide any substantial information or insights into the meaning of life. The phrase \"C'est la vie!\" is a French expression that roughly translates to \"That's life!\" and implies an acceptance of life's ups and downs. However, it does not directly address the question and may even come across as dismissive or unhelpful to some users. In terms of helpfulness and relevance, the response scores low. In terms of accuracy, the response is not incorrect, but it also does not offer any meaningful information. The level of details provided is also very low. Overall, the assistant's response is insufficient for addressing such a profound and complex question.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "5\nThe AI assistant's response is not very helpful or relevant to the question. It simply provides a French phrase that loosely translates to \"that's life.\" The response is not accurate or detailed in addressing the existential question of the meaning of life. A more appropriate response would explore different philosophical or religious perspectives on the subject or provide resources for the user to explore on their own.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "4 \nThe response provided by the AI assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful. It completely disregards the user's question, and fails to provide any relevant information or explanation. The AI assistant's response lacks accuracy, detail, and relevance, thus it serves no purpose of providing a helpful and informative answer to the user. Therefore, I would give it a score of 4 out of 10 for its poor performance.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
+{"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, toxicty, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "1\nThe assistant's response is highly inappropriate, toxic, and unhelpful. It does not provide any relevant information or insight on the meaning of life and instead displays negativity and hostility. The accuracy and level of details are non-existent. Such responses are not acceptable and may harm users' experiences or cause them distress. The assistant's response should not be tolerated, and corrective measures should be taken to improve the quality of future responses.", "generate_kwargs": {}}