commit files to HF hub

prompts.jsonl

@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "5\nThe response given by the AI assistant is not helpful, relevant, accurate or detailed enough. The assistant's answer doesn't address the question at all and seems to be a generic phrase. In terms of helpfulness, the AI assistant doesn't provide any useful information that would assist the user in understanding or exploring the meaning of life. The response is also not relevant to the question asked, which requires a deeper and more philosophical response. Finally, the answer does not demonstrate any level of accuracy or detail as it misses the mark altogether. Overall, the assistant requires significant improvement in terms of understanding the user's query and providing a relevant and informative response.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nThe start of the assistant's answer is not relevant to the question asked and doesn't provide any helpful information. However, the answer could potentially be interpreted as a humorous way of saying \"that's life\" which could be seen as relevant but not particularly helpful. Overall, the answer lacks accuracy and detail since it doesn't provide any meaningful explanation or insight into the meaning of life. The score of 6 reflects a neutral evaluation since the answer is not particularly helpful nor harmful, but it doesn't fully answer the question either.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "7\nThe response of the AI assistant to the question \"What is the meaning of life?\" seems to be irrelevant and unhelpful, as it merely provides an unrelated French expression. However, as the question is subjective and philosophical in nature, it could be argued that there is no single correct answer, and the assistant's response can be interpreted as a playful or lighthearted way of acknowledging this. Therefore, the accuracy and level of detail of the answer are difficult to evaluate, but the overall performance of the AI assistant could be improved if it provided a more informative and thought-provoking response.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
+{"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nThe assistant's response does not provide any substantial information or insights into the meaning of life. The phrase \"C'est la vie!\" is a French expression that roughly translates to \"That's life!\" and implies an acceptance of life's ups and downs. However, it does not directly address the question and may even come across as dismissive or unhelpful to some users. In terms of helpfulness and relevance, the response scores low. In terms of accuracy, the response is not incorrect, but it also does not offer any meaningful information. The level of details provided is also very low. Overall, the assistant's response is insufficient for addressing such a profound and complex question.", "generate_kwargs": {}}