commit files to HF hub

prompts.jsonl

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nThe assistant's response is not helpful, relevant or accurate in addressing the user's question. The phrase \"C'est la vie!\" does not provide any insights or explanations regarding the meaning of life. Therefore, the response is not detailed at all. Considering a scale of 1 to 10, we assigned the score 6 to the Assistant’s response as it is not offensive but does not provide any useful information either. The assistant needs to improve its understanding of the question and provide appropriate and relevant responses in the future to increase its score.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "7\nThe assistant's response is humorous but not particularly helpful, relevant, or accurate in answering the question about the meaning of life. However, since the question itself is a philosophical and subjective one, it may be difficult for an AI assistant to provide a satisfactory answer. The response did not provide any level of detail or try to engage with the question. Nonetheless, the assistant did attempt to acknowledge the question and respond in a lighthearted way.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
+{"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nThe assistant's response is not relevant, accurate or helpful in answering the user's question. \"C'est la vie!\" is a dismissive and unhelpful response that does not address the philosophical inquiry being asked.", "generate_kwargs": {}}