Event: Round 5: Nicolas Montenegro Morales - Centanaro Erazo, Nicole Daniela
Date: 2024-12-22
White: Nicolas Montenegro Morales
Black: Centanaro Erazo, Nicole Daniela
BlackElo: 1729
Result: 0-1
ECO: A04
Opening: Zukertort Opening: Sicilian Invitation
Variant: Standard

1. Nf3 { [%eval 0.14] } 1... c5 { [%eval 0.25] } 2. e3 { [%eval 0.06] } 2... d5 { [%eval 0.1] } 3. d4 { [%eval 0.0] } 3... Nf6 { [%eval 0.0] } 4. c4 { [%eval 0.0] } 4... Bg4?! { [%eval 0.74] } { Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best. } 5. cxd5 { [%eval 0.72] } 5... Nxd5 { [%eval 0.71] } 6. Be2 { [%eval 0.19] } 6... e6 { [%eval 0.42] } 7. e4 { [%eval -0.03] } 7... Nf6 { [%eval 0.0] } 8. Be3 { [%eval -0.37] } 8... Nxe4 { [%eval 0.11] } 9. Nc3 { [%eval -0.12] } 9... Nxc3 { [%eval -0.09] } 10. bxc3 { [%eval 0.05] } 10... Be7 { [%eval 0.19] } 11. O-O { [%eval -0.34] } 11... O-O { [%eval -0.29] } 12. dxc5 { [%eval -0.27] } 12... Qc7 { [%eval -0.25] } 13. Rb1?! { [%eval -0.97] } { Inaccuracy. Qa4 was best. } 13... Nd7 { [%eval -0.91] } 14. c6 { [%eval -0.99] } 14... bxc6 { [%eval -1.01] } 15. Nd4 { [%eval -1.31] } 15... Bxe2 { [%eval -1.22] } 16. Qxe2 { [%eval -1.14] } 16... Nf6 { [%eval -1.01] } 17. h3 { [%eval -1.39] } 17... Nd5 { [%eval -1.08] } 18. Rfc1?! { [%eval -1.85] } { Inaccuracy. Bd2 was best. } 18... Rfc8?! { [%eval -0.87] } { Inaccuracy. c5 was best. } 19. c4?! { [%eval -1.45] } { Inaccuracy. Bd2 was best. } 19... Nf6?! { [%eval -0.43] } { Inaccuracy. Nxe3 was best. } 20. Rb3 { [%eval -0.88] } 20... Rab8 { [%eval -0.71] } 21. Rcb1 { [%eval -0.71] } 21... h6? { [%eval 0.65] } { Mistake. Rxb3 was best. } 22. Rxb8 { [%eval 0.48] } 22... Rxb8 { [%eval 0.45] } 23. Rxb8+ { [%eval 0.5] } 23... Qxb8 { [%eval 0.54] } 24. Nxc6 { [%eval 0.5] } 24... Qb1+ { [%eval 0.47] } 25. Qf1 { [%eval 0.49] } 25... Qb7 { [%eval 0.43] } 26. Nxe7+ { [%eval 0.52] } 26... Qxe7 { [%eval 0.54] } 27. Qb1 { [%eval 0.46] } 27... Qa3? { [%eval 2.18] } { Mistake. a6 was best. } 28. c5?? { [%eval 0.01] } { Blunder. Qb8+ was best. } 28... Nd5 { [%eval 0.11] } 29. c6 { [%eval 0.0] } 29... Qd6?! { [%eval 0.84] } { Inaccuracy. Nxe3 was best. } 30. Qc2 { [%eval 0.9] } 30... Nxe3 { [%eval 1.44] } 31. fxe3 { [%eval 1.27] } 31... Qc7 { [%eval 1.25] } 32. a4 { [%eval 1.06] } 32... a5?? { [%eval 3.18] } { Blunder. Kf8 was best. } 33. Qc5 { [%eval 2.89] } 33... g6 { [%eval 3.49] } 34. Qb6 Qxb6 35. Kf2 Qxc6 36. Ke2 Qxa4 37. Kf3 Qb4 38. Ke2 0-1