Event: Round 3: Veloso, Samuel Caio Lima - Cunha, Luciano Augusto De Olivei
Date: 2024-08-18
White: Veloso, Samuel Caio Lima
Black: Cunha, Luciano Augusto De Olivei
Result: 1-0
ECO: C50
Opening: Italian Game: Hungarian Defense
Variant: Standard

1. e4 { [%eval 0.15] } 1... e5 { [%eval 0.21] } 2. Nf3 { [%eval 0.13] } 2... Nc6 { [%eval 0.19] } 3. Bc4 { [%eval 0.22] } 3... Be7 { [%eval 0.46] } 4. Nc3 { [%eval 0.16] } 4... Nf6 { [%eval 0.22] } 5. d3 { [%eval 0.17] } 5... O-O { [%eval 0.28] } 6. O-O { [%eval 0.2] } 6... d6 { [%eval 0.23] } 7. h3 { [%eval 0.0] } 7... h6 { [%eval 0.24] } 8. Be3 { [%eval -0.12] } 8... Be6 { [%eval 0.17] } 9. Nd5 { [%eval -0.35] } 9... Na5?! { [%eval 0.43] } { Inaccuracy. Bxd5 was best. } 10. Nxe7+ { [%eval 0.26] } 10... Qxe7 { [%eval 0.32] } 11. Bxe6 { [%eval 0.18] } 11... fxe6 { [%eval 0.22] } 12. Qd2 { [%eval 0.25] } 12... Nc6 { [%eval 0.35] } 13. Rad1 { [%eval 0.06] } 13... d5 { [%eval 0.1] } 14. exd5 { [%eval 0.0] } 14... exd5 { [%eval 0.02] } 15. d4 { [%eval 0.02] } 15... e4 { [%eval 0.0] } 16. Nh4 { [%eval -0.45] } 16... Qf7 { [%eval 0.0] } 17. Nf5 { [%eval -0.47] } 17... Qg6 { [%eval -0.46] } 18. Ng3 { [%eval -0.52] } 18... h5 { [%eval -0.06] } 19. Ne2 { [%eval -0.02] } 19... h4 { [%eval 0.09] } 20. Nf4 { [%eval 0.0] } 20... Qf5 { [%eval 0.0] } 21. Qe2 { [%eval -0.24] } 21... Nxd4?? { [%eval 2.5] } { Blunder. Ne7 was best. } 22. Rxd4 { [%eval 2.77] } 22... c5 { [%eval 2.58] } 23. Rdd1 { [%eval 2.94] } 23... d4 { [%eval 2.71] } 24. Bc1 { [%eval 2.92] } 24... Rae8 { [%eval 2.64] } 25. Qc4+ { [%eval 3.0] } 25... Kh7 { [%eval 3.05] } 26. f3 { [%eval 3.11] } 26... e3 { [%eval 3.15] } 27. Ne2 { [%eval 3.09] } 27... Nh5 { [%eval 3.83] } 28. Qd3?! { [%eval 2.93] } { Inaccuracy. c3 was best. } 28... Qxd3 { [%eval 3.25] } 29. Rxd3 { [%eval 3.28] } 29... Ng3 { [%eval 3.5] } 30. Re1 { [%eval 3.21] } 30... Nxe2+ { [%eval 3.62] } 31. Rxe2 { [%eval 3.76] } 31... Re4? { [%eval 7.33] } { Mistake. Re7 was best. } 32. b3?! { [%eval 4.75] } { Inaccuracy. fxe4 was best. } 32... b5?! { [%eval 7.06] } { Inaccuracy. Ref4 was best. } 33. Bb2?! { [%eval 4.67] } { Inaccuracy. fxe4 was best. } 33... Rd8? { [%eval 8.07] } { Mistake. Re6 was best. } 34. Rexe3?? { [%eval -5.07] } { Blunder. fxe4 was best. } 34... c4?? { [%eval 6.21] } { Blunder. Rxe3 was best. } 35. bxc4?? { [%eval -1.15] } { Blunder. Rxe4 was best. } 35... bxc4?? { [%eval 6.11] } { Blunder. Rxe3 was best. } 36. Rd1?? { [%eval -4.78] } { Blunder. Rxe4 was best. } 36... c3?? { [%eval 6.47] } { Blunder. Rxe3 was best. } 37. Bc1?? { [%eval -5.35] } { Blunder. Rxe4 was best. } 37... Rf8?? { [%eval 10.34] } { Blunder. dxe3 was best. } 38. Rxe4 { [%eval 10.15] } 38... Rb8 { [%eval 10.77] } 39. Rxh4+ { [%eval 10.46] } 39... Kg6 { [%eval 11.21] } 40. Rhxd4 { [%eval 10.79] } 40... Re8 { [%eval 11.51] } 41. Kf2 { [%eval 12.53] } 41... Re6 { [%eval 13.94] } 42. Rd6 { [%eval 84.33] } 1-0