Event: Round 2: Filip Simic - William Rumley
Date: 2024-01-13
White: Filip Simic
Black: William Rumley
Result: 1/2-1/2
ECO: A10
Opening: English Opening: Anglo-Dutch Defense
Variant: Standard

1. c4 { [%eval 0.14] [%clk 1:30:59] } 1... f5 { [%eval 0.6] [%clk 1:30:56] } 2. Nc3 { [%eval 0.44] [%clk 1:31:11] } 2... Nf6 { [%eval 0.48] [%clk 1:31:16] } 3. Nf3 { [%eval 0.7] [%clk 1:31:12] } 3... d6 { [%eval 0.81] [%clk 1:31:25] } 4. d4 { [%eval 0.78] [%clk 1:30:52] } 4... g6 { [%eval 0.75] [%clk 1:31:23] } 5. g3 { [%eval 0.54] [%clk 1:29:52] } 5... Bg7 { [%eval 0.47] [%clk 1:31:41] } 6. Bg2 { [%eval 0.53] [%clk 1:28:35] } 6... O-O { [%eval 0.6] [%clk 1:31:42] } 7. Qb3 { [%eval 0.53] [%clk 1:26:53] } 7... c6 { [%eval 0.64] [%clk 1:29:53] } 8. O-O { [%eval 0.39] [%clk 1:22:35] } 8... Na6 { [%eval 0.5] [%clk 1:26:59] } 9. Bg5 { [%eval 0.4] [%clk 1:13:25] } 9... Nc7 { [%eval 0.62] [%clk 1:19:42] } 10. Bxf6 { [%eval 0.5] [%clk 1:07:08] } 10... exf6?! { [%eval 1.14] } { Inaccuracy. Bxf6 was best. } { [%clk 1:15:14] } 11. d5 { [%eval 1.03] [%clk 1:05:49] } 11... c5 { [%eval 1.08] [%clk 1:12:58] } 12. a3 { [%eval 0.92] [%clk 1:05:06] } 12... Rb8 { [%eval 0.96] [%clk 1:02:17] } 13. a4 { [%eval 0.55] [%clk 0:54:06] } 13... b6 { [%eval 0.7] [%clk 0:51:32] } 14. Nb5 { [%eval 0.48] [%clk 0:49:16] } 14... a6?! { [%eval 1.21] } { Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best. } { [%clk 0:47:37] } 15. Na7 { [%eval 1.32] [%clk 0:44:24] } 15... Bd7?! { [%eval 1.98] } { Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best. } { [%clk 0:44:49] } 16. Nc6 { [%eval 1.96] } 16... Bxc6 { [%eval 2.04] [%clk 0:44:58] } 17. dxc6 { [%eval 1.98] [%clk 0:45:17] } 17... Kh8 { [%eval 2.17] [%clk 0:39:00] } 18. Qd3 { [%eval 2.06] [%clk 0:44:56] } 18... Re8 { [%eval 2.13] [%clk 0:34:08] } 19. Rfd1 { [%eval 2.12] [%clk 0:44:08] } 19... Bf8 { [%eval 2.25] [%clk 0:34:05] } 20. h4 { [%eval 2.07] [%clk 0:38:43] } 20... Qe7 { [%eval 2.12] [%clk 0:31:53] } 21. Qc3 { [%eval 1.98] [%clk 0:37:49] } 21... Kg7 { [%eval 2.08] [%clk 0:29:07] } 22. Rd2 { [%eval 1.93] [%clk 0:37:56] } 22... Rbd8 { [%eval 2.43] [%clk 0:27:10] } 23. Rad1 { [%eval 2.0] [%clk 0:37:36] } 23... b5 { [%eval 1.91] [%clk 0:26:06] } 24. axb5 { [%eval 1.64] [%clk 0:31:32] } 24... axb5 { [%eval 1.8] [%clk 0:26:30] } 25. cxb5 { [%eval 1.67] [%clk 0:31:13] } 25... Nxb5 { [%eval 1.57] [%clk 0:26:49] } 26. Qc4 { [%eval 1.39] [%clk 0:30:31] } 26... Nc7 { [%eval 1.39] [%clk 0:24:27] } 27. Nh2?! { [%eval 0.81] } { Inaccuracy. Ne1 was best. } { [%clk 0:27:48] } 27... Qe5? { [%eval 2.25] } { Mistake. Qe6 was best. } { [%clk 0:21:38] } 28. Nf3? { [%eval 0.68] } { Mistake. Nf1 was best. } { [%clk 0:26:33] } 28... Qe4?? { [%eval 2.7] } { Blunder. Qe6 was best. } { [%clk 0:20:39] } 29. Nd4 { [%eval 2.56] [%clk 0:23:03] } 29... Qe5 { [%eval 2.65] [%clk 0:15:45] } 30. Nf3?? { [%eval 0.65] } { Blunder. Nb5 was best. } { [%clk 0:18:29] } 30... Qe4?? { [%eval 2.66] } { Blunder. Qe6 was best. } { [%clk 0:16:15] } 31. Nd4 { [%eval 2.63] [%clk 0:17:21] } 31... Qe5 { [%eval 2.5] [%clk 0:16:42] } 32. Nf3?? { [%eval 0.0] } { Blunder. Nb5 was best. } { [%clk 0:17:12] } 1/2-1/2