Event: Round 6: Zhong Kai Tan - Yi Herng Joel Ong
Site: https://lichess.org/study/MnvaJ8v6/ZWkGQPc5
Date: 2023-02-05
White: Tan, Zhong Kai
WhiteElo: 1923
Black: Ong, Yi Herng Joel
BlackElo: 2086
Result: 0-1
ECO: C14
Opening: French Defense: Classical Variation, Steinitz Variation
Variant: Standard

1. e4 { [%eval 0.36] } 1... e6 { [%eval 0.0] } 2. d4 { [%eval 0.3] } 2... d5 { [%eval 0.25] } 3. Nc3 { [%eval 0.18] } 3... Nf6 { [%eval 0.0] } 4. Bg5 { [%eval 0.24] } 4... Be7 { [%eval 0.46] } 5. e5 { [%eval 0.31] } 5... Nfd7 { [%eval 0.32] } 6. Bxe7 { [%eval 0.4] } 6... Qxe7 { [%eval 0.45] } 7. f4 { [%eval 0.44] } 7... a6 { [%eval 0.49] } 8. Nf3 { [%eval 0.57] } 8... c5 { [%eval 0.36] } 9. Ne2 { [%eval 0.36] } 9... cxd4 { [%eval 0.47] } 10. Qd2 { [%eval 0.59] } 10... Nc5 { [%eval 0.73] } 11. O-O-O { [%eval 0.7] } 11... Nc6 { [%eval 0.6] } 12. Nexd4 { [%eval 0.48] } 12... Bd7 { [%eval 0.8] } 13. Kb1 { [%eval 0.65] } 13... O-O { [%eval 0.93] } 14. h4 { [%eval 0.44] } 14... f5 { [%eval 0.95] } 15. exf6 { [%eval 0.77] } 15... Qxf6 { [%eval 0.97] } 16. g3 { [%eval 0.85] } 16... Rae8?! { [%eval 1.43] } { Inaccuracy. Nxd4 was best. } 17. Qe3 { [%eval 1.26] } 17... Ne4 { [%eval 1.47] } 18. Nxc6 { [%eval 1.49] } 18... Nxg3?! { [%eval 2.32] } { Inaccuracy. Bxc6 was best. } 19. Nce5 { [%eval 2.31] } 19... Nxh1 { [%eval 2.4] } 20. Qg1?! { [%eval 1.57] } { Inaccuracy. Rd4 was best. } 20... Bc6?! { [%eval 2.7] } { Inaccuracy. Qxf4 was best. } 21. Rd4 { [%eval 2.71] } 21... Qe7?! { [%eval 3.54] } { Inaccuracy. Qh6 was best. } 22. Qxh1 { [%eval 3.57] } 22... Qc5 { [%eval 3.85] } 23. Bd3 { [%eval 3.23] } 23... Bb5 { [%eval 3.45] } 24. Qd1 { [%eval 2.95] } 24... Bxd3 { [%eval 3.03] } 25. Qxd3 { [%eval 2.96] } 25... Rf5 { [%eval 2.84] } 26. Ng5 { [%eval 2.75] } 26... Qf8 { [%eval 2.81] } 27. Rxd5?? { [%eval -3.28] } { Blunder. Qd2 was best. } 27... Qb4?? { [%eval 2.61] } { Blunder. exd5 was best. } 28. c4? { [%eval 1.28] } { Mistake. Ngf3 was best. } 28... Qe1+ { [%eval 1.18] } 29. Kc2 { [%eval 0.83] } 29... Qf2+ { [%eval 0.9] } 30. Kc3 { [%eval 0.41] } 30... Qxf4 { [%eval 0.49] } 31. Nxe6?? { [%eval -3.97] } { Blunder. Rc5 was best. } 31... Rxe6 { [%eval -3.98] } 32. Ng4?! { [%eval -5.01] } { Inaccuracy. Qd4 was best. } 32... Rxd5 { [%eval -4.75] } 33. cxd5 { [%eval -5.65] } 33... Qc1+ { [%eval -5.51] } 34. Qc2 { [%eval -6.12] } 34... Qxc2+ { [%eval -6.55] } 35. Kxc2 { [%eval -6.06] } 35... Re4 { [%eval -6.46] } 36. Nf2 { [%eval -6.54] } 36... Re2+ { [%eval -6.68] } 0-1