Event: Round 4.1: Elias Mandelkow - Niklas von Moers
Site: https://lichess.org/study/LKiCCUR4/QUNSpPCm
Date: 2022-10-02
White: Elias Mandelkow
Black: Niklas von Moers
Result: 1-0
ECO: E20
Opening: Nimzo-Indian Defense: Kmoch Variation
Variant: Standard

1. d4 { [%eval 0.0] [%clk 1:30:48] } 1... Nf6 { [%eval 0.23] [%clk 1:30:41] } 2. c4 { [%eval 0.29] [%clk 1:31:05] } 2... e6 { [%eval 0.23] [%clk 1:30:47] } 3. Nc3 { [%eval 0.05] [%clk 1:30:37] } 3... Bb4 { [%eval 0.25] [%clk 1:31:09] } 4. f3 { [%eval 0.0] [%clk 1:30:31] } 4... c5 { [%eval 0.0] [%clk 1:30:35] } 5. d5 { [%eval 0.0] [%clk 1:30:15] } 5... exd5 { [%eval 0.46] [%clk 1:26:32] } 6. cxd5 { [%eval 0.24] [%clk 1:30:37] } 6... d6 { [%eval 0.35] [%clk 1:26:52] } 7. e4 { [%eval 0.23] [%clk 1:30:23] } 7... O-O { [%eval 0.54] [%clk 1:23:33] } 8. Bd3 { [%eval 0.18] [%clk 1:29:34] } 8... Re8 { [%eval 0.64] [%clk 1:21:43] } 9. Ne2 { [%eval 0.63] [%clk 1:29:40] } 9... Nbd7 { [%eval 0.5] [%clk 1:20:55] } 10. a3 { [%eval 0.32] [%clk 1:26:32] } 10... Ba5 { [%eval 0.38] [%clk 1:19:16] } 11. O-O { [%eval 0.31] [%clk 1:25:41] } 11... Bb6?! { [%eval 1.12] } { Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best. } { [%clk 1:17:20] } 12. Kh1 { [%eval 1.0] [%clk 1:24:54] } 12... Ne5 { [%eval 0.99] [%clk 1:16:49] } 13. b3 { [%eval 0.56] [%clk 1:22:07] } 13... Nh5?! { [%eval 1.36] } { Inaccuracy. Ba5 was best. } { [%clk 1:07:50] } 14. Nf4? { [%eval 0.04] } { Mistake. Bb5 was best. } { [%clk 1:17:56] } 14... c4? { [%eval 1.29] } { Mistake. Nxf4 was best. } { [%clk 1:00:43] } 15. Bxc4 { [%eval 1.21] [%clk 1:13:32] } 15... Qh4?! { [%eval 1.98] } { Inaccuracy. Nxf4 was best. } { [%clk 0:57:26] } 16. Nxh5 { [%eval 1.7] [%clk 1:13:10] } 16... Qxh5 { [%eval 1.91] [%clk 0:57:44] } 17. Qe1?! { [%eval 0.87] } { Inaccuracy. Bb5 was best. } { [%clk 1:10:39] } 17... Bd4?! { [%eval 1.85] } { Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } { [%clk 0:50:56] } 18. Be3 { [%eval 1.75] [%clk 1:09:18] } 18... Bxc3?! { [%eval 2.54] } { Inaccuracy. Bxe3 was best. } { [%clk 0:51:10] } 19. Qxc3 { [%eval 2.37] [%clk 1:09:31] } 19... Bg4?? { [%eval 6.87] } { Blunder. f5 was best. } { [%clk 0:50:34] } 20. Bg1?? { [%eval 2.87] } { Blunder. fxg4 was best. } { [%clk 1:01:56] } 20... Rac8?? { [%eval 6.33] } { Blunder. Bd7 was best. } { [%clk 0:47:00] } 21. fxg4 { [%eval 6.17] [%clk 0:47:48] } 21... Nxg4 { [%eval 7.37] [%clk 0:47:12] } 22. Qf3 { [%eval 7.09] [%clk 0:45:35] } 22... Rxe4?! { [%eval 11.94] } { Inaccuracy. Qg6 was best. } { [%clk 0:46:37] } 23. Qxe4 { [%eval 11.87] [%clk 0:43:18] } 1-0