UN General Assembly
1995

principles which were supposed to have been settled at the very beginning of the Conference. The principle of land for peace still awaits the materialization of the concept of “land”. The principle of withdrawal is still being obfuscated by the term “redeployment”. We are told that resistance must cease, without any guarantee that withdrawal or liberation will ever take place. We are told that the boycott must end, but no guarantee is given that usurped rights will be 5 restored. We are required to engage in multilateral negotiations on complementary subjects while the fundamental bilateralism remains frozen and while we know not whether there will be peace, or what the form and content of that peace will ever be. We are required to shake hands and to celebrate before we know what exactly we are supposed to celebrate. We, the victims of aggression, are required to give security guarantees to the aggressor. Those who do not possess weapons are required to reassure those who possess one of the largest nuclear and chemical arsenals which the world