UN General Assembly
1967

62. The Assembly has heard appeals for peace from Israel speakers. The greatest affront that could be made to the very dignity of this Organization would be to give any credence to Israel's false show of peaceful intentions. For how can Israel speak of peace, stability and progress in the Near East when its very existence has been based from the outset on violence and expansion, culminating in the aggressive war of 5 June and the occupation of vast areas belonging to three Member States of the United Nations, three times larger than the area it already occupied before 5 June? How can these expansionist and racist policies of Israel differ from nazism in Europe — Europe, which saw the armies of Hitler occupy areas far exceeding the area of Germany? At that time, also, attempts were made to impose conditions on the victims, but were fiercely opposed and rejected. Would the case of the Arab people be any different?