Case: CHIEF MANAGER RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. VINOD KUMAR SHARMA

3. Few facts need mention for the disposal of the appeal. The appellant is the employer- Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation.The respondent is the employee working at all relevant time with the appellant on the post of. The dispute relates to dismissal ofthe respondent fromthe services on the ground of misconduct committed by him while on duty. The dismissal of the respondent is based on domestic. The dispute in relation to the respondents dismissal was dealt with by the Industrial Tribunal at the instance of the respondent-employee with a view to decide its legality and. It was then carried to the High Court in two rounds earlier which eventually led to passing of the impugned order by the Division Bench in an appeal filed by the appellant herein and now finally it is before this Court at the instance of the employer (RajasthanState Road Transport Corporation) against the dismissal of their appeal by the High

Reasoning:
10. The impugned order has neither set out the factsproperly nor the findings of the Tribunal clearly and Single Judge and nor dealt with any submissions urged by both the counsel and nor given its reasoning keeping in view the law laid down by this Court on the issues arising in the case to justify the dismissal of the appeal filed by the employer (appellant. In substance, we are not able to appreciate the slip short narration of the facts and unsubstantiatedreasoning in support of the conclusion arrived at by the Division. For these reasons, we do not wish to probe into the factual and legal issues arising in the case and instead allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the Division Bench of the High Court for deciding the appeal afresh on merits keeping in view the aforementioned observations made by us.