Case: M/s. Sher-E-Punjab Silk Stores Delh Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi

such partner who is deceased and shall, for any year of assessment up to and including the assessment for the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1953, be made before the 28th February, 1953, and for any year of assessment subsequent thereto, be made -(a) where the firm is not registered under the Indian Partnership Act 1932 (IX of 1932), or where the deed of partnership is not registered under the Indian Registration Act, 1908 (XVI of 1908), and the application for registration is being made for the first time under the Act.(i) within a period of six months of the constitution of the firm or before the end of the "previous year" of the firm whichever is earlier, if the firm was constituted in that previous year,(ii) before the end of the previous year in any other case.(b) where the firm is registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (Act IX of 1932), or where the deed of partnership is registered under the Indian Registration Act, l908 (XVI of 1908), before the end of the previous year of the firm, and(c) where the application is for renewal of registration under Rule 6 for any year, before the 30th day of June of that year:Provided that the Income-tax Officer may entertain an application made after the expiry of the time-limit specified in this rule, if he is satisfied that the firm was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the specified time.Rule 3 - The application referred to in Rule 2 shall be made in the form annexed to this rule and shall be accompanied by the original Instrument of Partnership under which the firm is constituted, together with a copy thereof: provided that if the Income-tax Officer is satisfied that for some sufficient reason the original Instrument cannot conveniently be produced, he may accept a copy of it certified in writing by all the partners (not being minors) or, where the application is made after dissolution of the firm, by all the persons referred to in the said Rule, to be correct copy, and in such a case the application shall be accompanied by a duplicate copy.FORM IForm of Application for Registration of a Firm under Section 26A of The IndianIncome-tax Act, 1922.ToThe Income-tax Officer,Dated 19Income-tax year 19 /19.1...................................................................2. ........................................................3. We do hereby certify that the profits (or loss if any) of the previous year were/will be(Period upto the date of dissolution were/will be)divided or credited as shown in Section B of the Schedule and that the information given above and in the attached Schedule is correct.(Signatures)(Address)Note: This application must be signed ...... ...... ...... ...... any such person who is deceased.Note: (1) If the interest, salary, and/or commission..................................... column with the letter "R". (In other cases the interest, salary and/or commission may exceed total profits so as to leave a balance of net loss divisible in column 6). (2) If any partner is entitled to share in profits but is not liable to bear a similar proportion of any losses this fact should be indicated by putting against share in column 6 the letter "P" . Rule 6: Any firm to whom a certificate of registration has been granted under Rule 4 may apply to the Income-tax Officer to have the certificate of registration renewed for a subsequent year. Such application shall be signed personally by all the partners (not being minors) of the firm or, where the application is made after dissolution of the firm, by all persons (not being minors) who were partners in the firm immediately before dissolution and by the legal representative of any such person who is deceased, and accompanied by a certificate in the form set out below. The application shall be made before the 30th day of June of the year for which assessment is to be made provided that the Income-tax Officer may entertain an application made after the expiry of the said date, if he is satisfied that the firm was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application before that date.Form of Application for the Renewal of Registration of a Firm under Section 26A of The Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.ToThe Income-tax OfficerDated 19Assessment of the Income-tax year 19/1. ......................................................2. ........................................................3. We do hereby further certify that the profits (or loss if any) of the previous year were/period up to the date of dissolution were/will be divided or credited as shown below:Particulars of the apportionment of the income, profits or gains (or loss) of the business, profession or vacation in the previous year or the period upto the date of dissolution between the partners who were entitled to share in such income, profits or gains (or loss).Note :- (1) If the interest, salary and/or............... loss divisible in column 6.(2) If any partner is entitled .................................his share in column 6 the letter "p".(Signatures)(Address.)Note : - This application must be signed personally..........................................of any such person who is deceased."3. From a reading of these provisions it is clear that in the case of an application for renewal it is incumbent on the part of the assessee to have divided the previous years profits. This conclusion appears to be obvious from Section 26A read with Rules 2, 3, 6 and the forms set out earlier.The contention of Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for the assessee, that if the relevant provisions are interpreted in the manner that we have done it leads to hardship to the assessee, is not relevant in view of the plain language of the provisions.4. Our conclusion in this regard receives support from the decision of Madras High Court in Surajmal v. Commr. of Income-tax, Madras, (1961) 43 ITR 491 (Mad) and that of the Allahabad High Court in Ganesh Lal Laxmi Narain v. Commr. of Income-tax, U. P. (1968) 68 ITR 696. In Khanjan Lal Sewak Ram v. Commr. of Income-tax, U. P. 83 ITR 175 = (AIR 1972 SC 61 ) this Court had ruled that para 3 of Rule 6 (supra) is mandatory.

Decision (1 = appeal accepted, 0 = rejected): 0

Explanation:
0[ds]3. From a reading of these provisions it is clear that in the case of an application for renewal it is incumbent on the part of the assessee to have divided the previous years profits. This conclusion appears to be obvious from Section 26A read with Rules 2, 3, 6 and the forms set out earlier.The contention of Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for the assessee, that if the relevant provisions are interpreted in the manner that we have done it leads to hardship to the assessee, is not relevant in view of the plain language of the provisions.Our conclusion in this regard receives support from the decision of Madras High Court in Surajmal v. Commr. of Income-tax, Madras, (1961) 43 ITR 491 (Mad)  and that of the Allahabad High Court in Ganesh Lal Laxmi Narain v. Commr. of Income-tax, U. P. (1968) 68 ITR 696.  In Khanjan Lal Sewak Ram v. Commr. of Income-tax, U. P. 83 ITR 175  = (AIR 1972 SC 61 ) this Court had ruled that para 3 of Rule 6 (supra) is mandatory.