Case: North East Finance Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. U.O.I. and Others

SLP(C) No. 14808/99 This Court on 9th January, 2001 passed the following Order:"........learned counsel for the petitioner states, which is also incorporated in I.A. No.10, he wants to be discharged as in spite of letters written by him to the petitioner, he is not responding learned counsel for the parties states that this matter is being adjourned time and again which is affecting many of the depositors as no relief is being given in view of the pendency of this matter in this Court. However, in view of the said application, we direct the Registrar to issue fresh notice to the petitioner stating his counsel has withdrawn from the case hence he may, if he is so advised, engage another counsel. The Registry shall give next date of hearing after six weeks from today. The notice shall also state that in case after service of notice he does not choose to appear or through counsel, the Court will proceed to examine his petition and decide the matter." * As learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Parijat Sinha was not getting response we ordered the Registry to sent notices to the petitioner. As per office report dated 12th March, 2001, the unserved registered covers containing notices from both the petitioners have been received back with the postal remarks `no such firm is existed at present, `not known respectively. Notice was also issued to District and Sessions Judge which has also been received back unserved with the postal remark `no such company or corporation in the name and style in Tibet Road Area nor there is any such person named-Ashok Dey carrying on business at Tibet Road, Gangtok.:3: The matter was taken up today again. There is none to press this petition.

Decision (1 = appeal accepted, 0 = rejected): 0

Explanation:
0[ds]As learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Parijat Sinha was not getting response we ordered the Registry to sent notices to the petitioner. As per office report dated 12th March, 2001, the unserved registered covers containing notices from both the petitioners have been received back with the postal remarks `no such firm is existed at present, `not known respectively. Notice was also issued to District and Sessions Judge which has also been received back unserved with the postal remark `no such company or corporation in the name and style in Tibet Road Area nor there is any such personDey carrying on business at Tibet Road, Gangtok.:3: The matter was taken up today again. There is none to press this petition.