Case: Healthways Dairy Products Co Vs. Union Of India

several authorities of this Court that for the purpose of levy of excise duty or any other similar tax the description of goods as popularly and commonly understood has to be taken as the description of the same goods in the relevant provisions of the statute or the Rules. In this case there are materials to show that condensed milk and condensed skimmed milk are two different items of milk preparations. In common parlance milk means the full cream milk as milched from the cattle. It becomes skimmed milk when cream i.e., fat is extracted from milk. Thereafter the skimmed milk which also can be called a form of preparation of milk is known as such. It becomes easy to digest and is used in preparation of other milk products which are different from the milk products prepared from full cream milk. In the Hand Book on Self Removal Procedure under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, 3rd edition published in June, 1972 by the Central Board of Excise and Customs is to be found Instruction 8(b) to say : Every assessee is also required to maintain a daily account of important raw materials in Form IV (Annexure II) and also to submit a quarterly return in form RT 5 (Annexure III) under Rule 55 of Central Excise Rules, 1944. One or two important raw materials, which have been prescribed for most of the excisable goods under self Removal Procedure, are shown in Annexure IV. The assessee may maintain daily account and submit quarterly RT 5 return only in respect of these specified raw materials. 3. In Annexure IV are to be found Items 13 and 14 respectively in this terms : "13. Milk powder but excluding such powder specially prepared for feeding of infants. "14. Condensed milk whether sweetened or not." 4. In column 4, under the heading "names of important raw materials against item No. 13 is mentioned "whole fresh milk/skimmed milk as the case may be" and against Item 14 are found the words "fresh milk/and sugar". It would be noticed that the description in Items 13 and 14 of Annexure IV is identical to that of Items 12 and 13 in the list of excluded items from the Exemption Notification. Yet in item milk powder in Annexure IV as against the names of important raw materials both "whole fresh milk" and "skimmed milk" are mentioned. But as against condensed milk only "fresh milk" is mentioned. Such a handling of the description of the milk products and preparations does indicate that the Central Government when it mentioned condensed milk in Item 13 of the notification dated the 1st March, 1970 it meant to exclude from exemption only condensed milk of full cream milk and not the condensed skimmed milk prepared from skimmed milk. The milk preparation condensed skimmed milk prepared from skimmed milk fell within the Exemption Notification and not within excluded Item 13.3.Some support, although a feeble one, can be lent to the above view with reference to Rule 42 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. In clause (6) of the said Rules are mentioned the forms of label to be put on condensed milk and the four types of labels are : "(1) Condensed Full Cream Milk (unsweetened). (2) Condensed Full Cream Milk (sweetened). (3) Condensed Machine-Skimmed Milk or Condensed Skimmed Milk (unsweetened). (4) Condensed Machine-Skimmed Milk or Condensed Skimmed Milk (sweetened). In Item 13 of the notification when the Government added the words "whether sweetened or not" it did mean to classify the condensed milk of sweetened or unsweetened variety but did not intended to include in Item 13 condensed skimmed milk whether sweetened or unsweetened. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that the petitioner had obtained a licence for manufacture of condensed milk only under the Excise Act. It did not obtain a licence for manufacture of condensed skimmed milk. Counsel, therefore, submitted that for the purpose of the levy of the excise duty both would be on the same footing. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted in reply that if excise duty was not leviable on condensed skimmed milk then no licence was required for its manufacture. The position of law seems to be this under Section 6 of the Excise Act no person can engage in the production or manufacture of any specified goods included in the First Schedule of the Act except under the authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions of a licence granted under the Act. It will have been seen therefore, that since skimmed milk or condensed skimmed milk will be a milk preparation within the meaning of Item 1B of the First Schedule, a licence to manufacture such milk would be required. If any goods specified in the First Schedule are exempted from the levy of excise duty by the Central Government in exercise of their power under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, that cannot affect the manufacture of the said goods. But in this case we are not concerned to find out whether the petitioner was manufacturing condensed skimmed milk without a licence and if so, whether it was commiting any offence. But even assuming that the petitioner had a manufacturing licence under Section 6 of the Act only for manufacture of condensed milk that by itself will not take condensed skimmed milk out of the Exemption Notification and include it in the excluded Item 13. For the purpose of levy of excise duty, therefore, condensed skimmed milk remains included in the Exemption Notification. 6. Learned counsel also drew our attention to the form of price list of the petitioner showing separate prices for "Condensed milk (full cream)" and "Condensed milk (skimmed)". That again is of no help for the determination of the point at issue. Unless and until skimmed milk is included in Item 13 of the Exemption Notification of the 1st March, 1970 it remains an Item of goods exempted from levy of excise duty. 7.

Decision (1 = appeal accepted, 0 = rejected): 1

Explanation:
1[ds]t is well-established by several authorities of this Court that for the purpose of levy of excise duty or any other similar tax the description of goods as popularly and commonly understood has to be taken as the description of the same goods in the relevant provisions of the statute or the Rules. In this case there are materials to show that condensed milk and condensed skimmed milk are two different items of milk preparationsThe position of law seems to be this under Section 6 of the Excise Act no person can engage in the production or manufacture of any specified goods included in the First Schedule of the Act except under the authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions of a licence granted under the Act. It will have been seen therefore, that since skimmed milk or condensed skimmed milk will be a milk preparation within the meaning of Item 1B of the First Schedule, a licence to manufacture such milk would be required. If any goods specified in the First Schedule are exempted from the levy of excise duty by the Central Government in exercise of their power under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, that cannot affect the manufacture of the said goods. But in this case we are not concerned to find out whether the petitioner was manufacturing condensed skimmed milk without a licence and if so, whether it was commiting any offence. But even assuming that the petitioner had a manufacturing licence under Section 6 of the Act only for manufacture of condensed milk that by itself will not take condensed skimmed milk out of the Exemption Notification and include it in the excluded Item 13. For the purpose of levy of excise duty, therefore, condensed skimmed milk remains included in the Exemption NotificationThat again is of no help for the determination of the point at issue. Unless and until skimmed milk is included in Item 13 of the Exemption Notification of the 1st March, 1970 it remains an Item of goods exempted from levy of excise duty.