goal-setting in stroke: from guideline towards implementation: a realist evaluation

Conditions: Stroke

Summary: overall objective: the aim of the project is to integrate the quality improvement programme on goal setting into the current care of people with stroke and to test and refine this programme. target group: 1. people after a stroke (treatment in the participating centres); total number 155 people 2. informal carers (only if the person has had a stroke and has limited opportunities to participate) 3. professional carer; total number 155 people what? the goal-setting programme becomes standard care, it is checked whether the programme has been applied in care by health professionals (review of the patient's medical record), what the effects are on patients (questionnaires) and health professionals (questionnaires) and whether the quality improvement programme needs to be adjusted or refined (interviews with health professionals and the patient group) when to evaluate? 1. health professionals: start of the study and end of the study via questionnaires. interviews/focus group (every 3 months) 2. review of patient records and observations (every 3 weeks) 3. patient assessment: admission and 1 week before discharge or end of study, interviews/focus group (3 months)

aim this study aims to evaluate the implementation of a quality improvement program to improve goal-setting in the rehabilitation process after a stroke event (further referred to as goal-setting programme) by means of a realist evaluation. during this project, following questions will be answered: what are the different elements and the final form of the initial goal-setting programme? how is goal-setting for the implementation of the goal-setting programme conducted? how is the goal-setting programme implemented? is the goal-setting programme accepted, is it appropriate and feasible to implement? (review the implementation process). are adjustments needed on the goal-setting programme? how are the adjustments in the goal-setting programme being followed up? (review the implementation process) does the implementation of the goal-setting programme in healthcare have an effect for patient or professional healthcare providers? (patient and healthcare professional outcome: satisfaction with stroke care, participation, emotional status, empowerment and quality of life and overall feeling on goal-setting in stroke care)

Eligibility criteria:
professional healthcare providers inclusion criteria: * participants are employed in hospitals, rehabilitation centres and/or private practices/primary healthcare facilities located in the provinces: province of flemish brabant, brussels, province of walloon brabant, limburg * participants have a social, medical profession/background, work in the management of healthcare services or quality of healthcare * participants involved (direct or indirect) in the goal-setting process of the patients * participants who master the flemish or french language * adult participants (≥18 years) exclusion criteria: • not giving informed consent patients inclusion criteria: * participants after a stroke event. * residence in one of the four participating sites, in outpatient care or receive treatment in first line zone * participants who master the flemish or french language * adult participants (≥18 years) exclusion criteria: * not giving informed consent * other severe comorbidities that interfere with the rehabilitation process or goal-setting process informal caregivers inclusion criteria: • informal caregiver of a stroke patient admitted to one of the four participating sites

Keywords: implementation realist evaluation stroke improvement program goal setting