penn medicine biobank return of results program

Conditions: Genetic Disease; Cancer; Cardiovascular Diseases

Summary: the goal of this hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study is to evaluate and compare different ways of delivering genetic research results to participants. the main questions the study aims to answer are: * is sharing actionable genetic research results with participants through a multimedia patient-informed ehealth intervention (e.g. patient portal) no worse than sharing results by telephone or videoconference with a genetic counselor? * will research participants access an ehealth educational intervention or chatbot education to learn about research results being offered and the option to decline learning their individual research results and how frequently participants choose to decline actionable research results? * who benefits less and more from digital intervention with return of actionable research results and what barriers exist to using these tools for return of research results outside this study? participants in the biobank will be offered digital tools to learn about research results being offered and the option to decline receiving these results. those who don't decline and have an actionable result will be randomly assigned to receive their results with a genetic counselor or through an ehealth portal. participants will complete surveys before and after receipt of results to understand patient experiences with these methods of education and return of results to determine if digital tools can be used to help ensure more patients get access to research results which could impact their health.

the scientific aims of the study are: aim 1 (effectiveness of ehealth return of results): to evaluate in a randomized study whether disclosure of actionable genetic results by an ehealth intervention (ehealthror) provides non-inferior short-term and longitudinal outcomes (knowledge, psychological distress, health and psychosocial behaviors and costs) compared to phone disclosure by a gc (e.g. usual care). aim 2 (ehealth education and assessing preferences): to evaluate: a) the uptake of supplemental ehealth (ehealthed) and chatbot education (chated) among 1250 penn biobank research participants notified of the option to opt-out of receipt of actionable genetic research results; b) the frequency of opting-out of receipt of actionable genetic research results; and c) the impact of ehealthed/chated use on opting out of receipt of results. aim 3 (implementation): to conduct a multi-stakeholder mixed-methods process evaluation, to understand: a) potential moderators (e.g. intervention usage, sociodemographic factors, genetic test result) of short-term and longitudinal outcomes to understand who benefits more or less from ehealth/chatbot education and ehealth return of result; and b) facilitators and barriers to implementation of ehealth/chatbot interventions for return of actionable genetic research results and recommendations for future adaptation and sustainability.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * potential subjects will include select individuals who participated in penn medicine biobank, institutional review board (irb) protocol number 813913. * english speaking * age 18 years or older * have an actionable genetic mutation (see appendix a) or have been selected as a control participant * agreed to be re-contacted in the future or were not provided the opportunity to indicate a preference exclusion criteria: * deceased assessed by electronic medical record, death index or identified after contact * evidence in the clinical record that the subject has already received the same actionable result through clinical genetic testing

Keywords: genetic counseling return of research results genetic testing