safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses of rel-1017 (d-methadone)

Conditions: Neuropathic Pain

Summary: this study evaluated the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics (pk) of d-methadone in a limited dose range, in single administrations in humans.

this was a phase 1, single-center study carried out in healthy male and female subjects to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pk of d-methadone. this was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 6 sequential cohorts of healthy subjects. single oral doses of d-methadone were investigated in sequential cohorts. the proposed doses were 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg. the decision to enroll the sequential cohort at the next dose level was based on the safety data and available pk data from previous doses. dose escalation depended on the emergence of dose-limiting aes and review of the safety data. progression to the next higher dose only occurred if the previous dose level was deemed to be safe and well tolerated by the investigator, safety review team, and sponsor. of the 8 subjects in each cohort, 2 subjects received placebo and 6 subjects received d-methadone. subjects were admitted the day prior to receiving the study drug and remained in the clinical research unit (cru) under clinical supervision for at least 72 hours post-dose. at the discretion of the investigator or designee, the confinement time could have been extended to ensure the safety of each subject. visits 3 and 4 were follow-up visits approximately 6±2 days and 10±2 days, respectively, after drug administration. based on the blinded safety data from cohorts 1 to 4, single doses of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, and 100 mg of d-methadone or placebo were well tolerated and there were no dose-limiting aes. during all cohorts, subjects were evaluated for safety (aes, vital signs, electrocardiograms \[ecgs\], cardiac telemetry, pulse oximetry, clinical laboratory tests), tolerability, and pk. the following signs of opioid toxicity were deemed to be of special interest: * sustained respiratory depression that results in oxygen saturation below 92% * qtc prolongation (\>500 ms or \>70 ms above the baseline) * protracted nausea and vomiting * any ae deemed by the investigator to be dose-limiting safety analysis safety and tolerability parameters were listed by treatment and subject and displayed in summary tables using descriptive statistics. original terms used to identify aes were coded using the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (meddra), version 17.1. the number and percentage of subjects with treatment emergent aes (teaes) were summarized by system organ class, preferred term, and treatment and for each treatment by maximum intensity and maximum relationship to study treatment. descriptive statistics for vital signs were calculated and presented for each time point by treatment (absolute values and change from baseline). ecg results (absolute values and change from baseline \[average of triplicate assessments, where applicable\]) were summarized using descriptive statistics; frequencies (numbers and percentages) were calculated for the overall evaluation by scheduled time and treatment. laboratory data were summarized by the type of test and scheduled visit. descriptive statistics and number of subjects with laboratory test results below, within, and above normal ranges were tabulated by scheduled time. abnormal findings in laboratory data were listed with a flag for clinical significance. medical history abnormalities were coded to meddra terms. physical examination abnormalities were also listed. the original verbatim terms for concomitant medications were coded into drug class and preferred term. these data were listed. pharmacokinetic analysis the pk parameters for d-methadone determined by non-compartmental analysis were summarized by dose. graphs of concentration (linear and log-linear) vs time were generated. descriptive statistics were calculated by dose and time point for all d-methadone concentrations. concentrations below the limit of quantification (blq) were set to zero for the generation of summary statistics and mean concentration-time plots. for the calculation of the pk parameters, concentration-time data were treated as follows: blq concentrations prior to the first quantifiable concentration were set to zero; blq concentrations after the first quantifiable concentration were treated as missing; pre-dose sampling times relative to dosing were set to zero. descriptive statistics were calculated by dose. the dose proportionality of cmax and auc was assessed by the hummel method. tmax and t½ for different doses were compared using the kruskall-wallis test to determine whether there was any difference among the treatment groups, and the wilcoxon rank-sum test for contrasts. pharmacodynamic analysis the pd data at each time point were summarized by descriptive statistics and presented graphically (as appropriate). derived endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics. outliers were listed by measure and parameter. pupillometry constriction was listed and grouped by dose and subject with descriptive statistics for changes from baseline for different time points.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. healthy male or female subjects, 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive 2. body mass index (bmi) within the range of 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive, and a minimum weight of 50.0 kg 3. non-smoker for at least 3 months and tested negative on a breath carbon monoxide (co) test 4. male subjects of reproductive potential must have been using and willing to continue using medically acceptable contraception from screening and for at least 2 months after the last study drug administration 5. female subjects of childbearing potential must have been using and willing to continue using medically acceptable contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening (at least 3 months for oral, transdermal, vaginal ring contraceptives) and for at least 2 months after last study drug administration 6. female subjects of non-childbearing potential must have met the criteria defined in the clinical protocol 7. able to speak, read, and understand english sufficiently to allow completion of all study assessments 8. must have understood and provided written informed consent, prior to the initiation of any protocol-specific procedures exclusion criteria: 1. self-reported substance or alcohol dependence (excluding nicotine and caffeine) within the past 2 years, and/or subjects who had ever been in a substance or alcohol rehabilitation program to treat their substance or alcohol dependence 2. subject-reported family history of substance abuse in an immediate family member (i.e., parent, sibling, or child) 3. history or presence of clinically significant abnormality as assessed by physical examination, medical history, 12-lead ecg, vital signs, or laboratory values, which in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardize the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results 4. chronic use of prescribed opioids (i.e., \>120 days in a 6-month period) or any recreational use of opioids 5. evidence of clinically significant hepatic or renal impairment, including alanine aminotransferase (alt) or aspartate aminotransferase (ast) \>1.5× upper limit of normal (uln) or bilirubin \>1× uln 6. history or family history of sudden unexplained death or long qt syndrome 7. qt interval corrected using fridericia's formula (qtcf) \>450 ms in females or \>430 ms in males 8. history of hypotension 9. history or presence of any condition in which an opioid was contraindicated (e.g., significant respiratory depression, acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, bronchitis, or had/was suspected of having paralytic ileus) 10. history of status asthmaticus, chronic pulmonary disease, or severe allergic reaction (including anaphylaxis) to any substance 11. use of an opioid within the 6 months prior to screening 12. use of a prohibited medication 13. positive urine drug screen 14. positive breath alcohol test; subjects with a positive result may have been rescheduled at the investigator's discretion 15. female subjects who were currently pregnant (had a positive pregnancy test) 16. history of allergy or hypersensitivity to methadone or related drugs (e.g., opioids) 17. positive for hepatitis b, hepatitis c, or human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) 18. donation or loss of more than 500 ml of whole blood within 30 days prior to first drug administration 19. difficulty with venous access or unsuitable or unwilling to undergo catheter insertion 20. treatment with an investigational drug within 5 times the elimination half-life, if known (e.g., a marketed product) or within 30 days (if the elimination half-life is unknown) prior to first drug administration or was concurrently enrolled in any research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study 21. an employee of the sponsor or research site personnel directly affiliated with this study or their immediate family member, defined as a spouse, parent, sibling, or child, whether biological or legally adopted 22. a subject who, in the opinion of the investigator or designee, was considered unsuitable or unlikely to comply with the study protocol for any reason