pediatric high-risk deep venous thrombosis lytic outcomes trial

Conditions: Deep Vein Thrombosis; Post-Thrombotic Syndrome; Venous Thrombosis

Summary: the purpose of this study is to determine if the use of adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (cdt), which includes the intrathrombus administration of rt-pa (activase/alteplase), can prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (pts) in pediatric patients with symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (dvt) as compared with optimal standard anticoagulation alone.

rt-pa, the study drug, is a fibrinolytic drug that is indicated for use in acute myocardial infarction, acute ischemic stroke, and acute massive pulmonary embolism in adults. previous studies have shown the ability of rt-pa to lyse venous thrombus in patients with deep vein thrombosis (dvt), and suggest that successful rt-pa mediated thrombolysis can prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (pts). rt-pa is delivered directly into venous thrombus using a catheter/device which is embedded within the thrombus by a physician under imaging guidance. this method of rt-pa delivery, catheter-directed thrombolysis (cdt), is thought to be safer, more effective, and more efficient than previous methods. the question of whether cdt using rt-pa improves long-term dvt patient outcomes with acceptable risk and cost is currently being studied in the attract trial for adults, but has not yet been addressed in the pediatric population. the rationale for performing the phlo trial is based upon: * the major burden of pts on pediatric dvt patients and the u.s. healthcare system * the reported association between rapid clot lysis and prevention of pts * the proven ability of rt-pa to dissolve venous thrombus in proximal dvt * the recent advances in cdt methods which may lower bleeding risk, but which could, inadvertently, cause more endothelial injury in the smaller caliber vessels of pediatric patients * the lack of outcome evidence for either anticoagulation or catheter-directed thrombolysis in children * the major clinical controversy on whether cdt should routinely be used for first-line dvt therapy

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * subject and/or legal guardian has voluntarily provided signed informed consent. * subject is 6-21 years old with a minimum weight of 20 kg at the time of enrollment. * radiologically-confirmed, symptomatic proximal lower extremity dvt involving the inferior vena cava, iliac vein, and/or common femoral vein; dvt must be occlusive in at least one involved vein * life expectancy greater than or equal to 2 years. exclusion criteria: * symptom duration \> 14 days for dvt episode in affected leg * known history of a bleeding disorder * known history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (hit) * prior established diagnosis of pts in lower extremities * circulatory compromise necessitating surgery * pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic compromise or other acute illness precluding tolerance of catheter-directed therapy * severe hypersensitivity or allergy to activase(r), iodinated contrast or planned treatment anticoagulant drug, except for mild-moderate contrast allergies for which steroid pre-treatment can be used. * inability to maintain hemoglobin \ 1.7, or platelets \<100,000/ml, using transfusion as indicated. * active or historic bleeding, vasculopathy, coagulopathy, invasive procedure or medical condition contraindicating thrombolysis or anticoagulation * previous thrombolysis within the last month * pregnant female or within 7 days of uncomplicated delivery * participation in another investigational study within the last month * life expectancy \< 2 years or with chronic non-ambulatory status * inability to provide informed consent or to comply with study assessments

Keywords: phlo deep vein thrombosis deep venous thrombosis blood clot catheter-directed thrombolysis thrombolysis post-thrombotic syndrome pts recombinant tissue plasminogen activator rt-pa activase alteplase