neuromodulation as an anti-inflammatory treatment in sci

Conditions: Spinal Cord Injuries; Inflammation

Summary: the goal of this single-blinded randomized, controlled trial is to assess the impact of 1-hour of active transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tavns) vs sham tavns on serum biomarkers of the inflammatory reflex and inflammation in individuals with spinal cord injury. the main question it aims to answer is: whether tavns is a safe and effective anti-inflammatory intervention for individuals with sci. participants will perform a single 1-hour bout of the respective tavns treatment with blood draws prior to treatment, immediately following treatment, and 24 hours following treatment. changes in biomarkers between the active and sham tavns conditions will be compared.

chronic inflammation is very common among individuals living with spinal cord injury (sci) and contributes to a number of health complications(1). drug treatments are available to help reduce inflammation, however, many patients are unresponsive, become resistant or experience adverse effects such as increased risk of infection(2). there is a need for other treatments which reduce inflammation while avoiding harmful side effects. it is now understood that the nervous systems plays an important role in regulating the immune system and controlling inflammation. the vagus nerve has been shown to be a particularly important part of the nervous system in terms of limiting inflammation. however, sci causes disruption to the nervous system, including reduced activity of the vagus nerve. this may contribute to excessive inflammation. new technologies have been developed that allow the vagus nerve to be activated by electrically stimulating a part of the ear. this technique called vagus nerve stimulation (vns) has been shown to help reduce inflammation in numerous populations. however, it has not been assessed in individuals with sci. this study will assess if stimulating the vagus nerve can be a safe and effective way to reduce inflammation in individuals with sci. to assess this, 30 individuals with sci who agree to participate will be randomly assigned to receive either active vns treatment or sham treatment (whereby the device will placed in such a way that it does not stimulate the vagus nerve). participants will not be aware of which group they are in. the study will take place over a 2-day period. on day one, participants will arrive in the morning for a fasted blood draw to assess baseline inflammation. following the blood draw, participants will receive 1-hour of either the active or sham vns therapy. immediately following vns therapy a second blood draw will be performed. on day 2 participants will be asked to return at the same time of day to complete a final fasted blood draw. this will allow for the assessment of how well the therapy activated 2 key anti-inflammatory pathways controlled by the vagus nerve and resulting changes in inflammation (immediate and 24-hour post). it is expected that vns therapy will be well-tolerated, safe and effective at reducing inflammation in individuals with sci. if this is shown, vns may prove to be a simple and cost-effective means of reducing chronic inflammation in individuals with sci and may help to replace and/or reduce the need for other pharmaceutical drugs which are associated with adverse health outcomes.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * any level of severity of spinal cord injury * 18 years of age or older exclusion criteria: * pregnant or attempting to become pregnant * people with active implants (e.g. cochlear implant, implanted vagus nerve stimulator, cardiac pacemaker) * people with cerebral shunts

Keywords: vagus nerve stimulation