anti-vegf treatment for prevention of pdr/dme

Conditions: Diabetic Retinopathy; Diabetic Macular Edema

Summary: multiple studies have implicated vascular endothelial growth factor vegf as a major causative factor in human eye diseases characterized by neovascularization including proliferative diabetic retinopathy (pdr) and vascular permeability including diabetic macular edema (dme). while there is strong evidence that pdr outcomes are markedly reduced in eyes that are treated with monthly anti-vegf therapy (a study of ranibizumab injection in subjects with clinically significant macular edema (me) with center involvement secondary to diabetes mellitus: ride/rise) and moderately reduced in eyes that received fairly frequent dosing during the 1st year of treatment (diabetic retinopathy clinical research network protocol i), it is unknown whether or not an earlier but less frequent dosing regimen would result in similar, favorable anatomic outcomes, and whether favorable anatomic outcomes subsequently would result in favorable visual acuity outcomes. if this study demonstrates that intravitreous aflibercept treatment is effective and safe for reducing the onset of pdr or center involved- dme (ci-dme) in eyes that are at high risk for these complications, a new strategy to prevent vision threatening complications of diabetes will be available for patients. the application of intravitreous aflibercept earlier in the course of disease (i.e., at the time when an eye has baseline severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy) could help to reduce future potential treatment burden in patients, at the same time resulting in similar or better long-term visual outcomes, if pdr and dme are prevented. the primary objectives of this protocol are to 1) determine the efficacy and safety of intravitreous aflibercept injections versus sham injections (observation) for prevention of pdr or ci-dme in eyes at high risk for development of these complications and 2) compare long-term visual outcomes in eyes that receive anti-vegf therapy early in the course of disease with those that are observed initially, and treated only if high-risk pdr or ci-dme with vision loss develops. secondary objectives include: * comparing other visual acuity outcomes between treatment groups, such as proportion of eyes with at least 10 or at least 15 letter loss from baseline, or gain or loss of at least 5 letters at the consecutive study visit just before and at the 2- or 4-year visit * comparing optical coherence tomography (oct) outcomes, such as mean change in oct central subfield thickness and volume from baseline * comparing proportion of eyes with at least 2 and 3-step worsening or improvement of diabetic retinopathy severity level (scale for individual eyes) by central reading center from baseline * comparing associated treatment and follow-up exam costs between treatment groups * comparing safety outcomes between treatment groups


Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. age \>= 18 years 2. diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) • any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present: 1. current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes 2. current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes 3. documented diabetes by american diabetes association and/or world health organization criteria 3. able and willing to provide informed consent. meets all of the following ocular criteria in at least one eye: 1. best corrected electronic-early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (e-etdrs) visual acuity letter score ≥79 (approximate snellen equivalent 20/25 or better) 2. severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (npdr) (based on the 4:2:1 rule) evident on clinical examination and on digital imaging as judged by the investigator. reading center grading of less than etdrs level 43 or greater than 53 is an exclusion. severe npdr is defined as: 1. all 4 midperipheral quadrants show severe hemorrhages or microaneurysms (at least as great as standard photograph 2a, approximately 20 dot and blot hemorrhages), or 2. at least 2 fields of definite venous beading in the midperipheral quadrants or at least 1 field at least as severe as standard photograph 6a, or 3. at least 1 field of moderate intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (irma) in the midperipheral quadrants, at least as severe as standard photograph 8a 3. no evidence of neovascularization on clinical exam including active neovascularization of the iris (small iris tufts are not an exclusion) or angle neovascularization (if the angle is assessed). 4. no evidence of neovascularization (nv) on fluorescein angiography within the 7-modified etdrs fields, confirmed by the central reading center prior to randomization. • the widest method of imaging available at the site must be used to document whether there is nv present in the periphery; however, presence of nv outside of the 7-modified etdrs fields on ultrawide field imaging will not be an exclusion provided treatment is not planned. 5. no center-involved diabetic macular edema (ci-dme) on clinical exam and optical coherence tomography (oct) central subfield thickness must be below the following gender and oct-machine specific thresholds: 1. zeiss cirrus: 290 µm in women and 305 µm in men 2. heidelberg spectralis: 305 µm in women and 320 µm in men 3. investigator and potential participant are comfortable withholding treatment for dme until there is at least a 10% increase in oct central subfield thickness with confirmed visual acuity loss (10 letter loss at a single visit or 5 to 9 at two consecutive visits). 6. prompt panretinal photocoagulation (prp) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-vegf) treatment not required and investigator and potential participant are willing to wait for development of high-risk characteristics (defined in protocol) to treat pdr. 7. media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient to obtain adequate fundus photographs, fluorescein angiogram, and oct. * investigator must verify accuracy of oct scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality (including segmentation line placement) exclusion criteria: 1. history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. 2. a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control). 3. initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months. 4. participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment within 30 days of randomization with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied. • note: study participants cannot participate in another investigational trial that involves treatment with an investigational drug while participating in the study. 5. known allergy to any component of the study drug or any drug used in the injection prep (including povidone iodine prep). 6. known allergy to fluorescein dye. 7. blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110). • if blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible. 8. systemic anti-vegf or pro-vegf treatment within 4 months prior to randomization. • these drugs should not be used during the study. 9. for women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 2 years. • women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed. 10. individual is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another diabetic retinopathy clinical research network certified clinical center during the next 2 years. individual has any of the following ocular characteristics in the eye(s) being evaluated: 1. exam or photographic evidence of vitreous hemorrhage or preretinal hemorrhage presumed to be from pdr. 2. history of prior vitreous hemorrhage or preretinal hemorrhage presumed to be from pdr. 3. history of prior prp (defined as ≥100 burns outside of the posterior pole). 4. an ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., retinal vein or artery occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, vitreomacular traction, etc.). 5. history of dme or diabetic retinopathy treatment with laser or intraocular injections of medication within the prior 12 months and no more than 4 prior intraocular injections at any time in the past. • enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 25% of the planned sample size with any history of treatment for dme and/or diabetic retinopathy. once this number of eyes has been enrolled, any history of treatment for dme and/or diabetic retinopathy will be an exclusion criterion. 6. history of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization. 7. any history of vitrectomy. 8. history of yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization. 9. aphakia. 10. exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis. 11. evidence of uncontrolled glaucoma. * intraocular pressure must be \<30, with no more than one topical glaucoma medication, and no documented glaucomatous field loss for the eye to be eligible.

Keywords: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy