atrial fibrillation/flutter outcome risk determination

Conditions: Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter

Summary: it is our hypotheses that 1) readily available emergency department data can be utilized in an atrial fibrillation clinical prediction rule to identify those patients at low or high risk for adverse outcomes; 2) assigned risk can be utilized to drive physician decision-making by identifying patients who do not require hospital admission (low risk) and patients needing hospitalization (high risk); and 3) a facile version of the afpr will be easily incorporated into standard emergency department patient management systems and assist physicians with risk stratification of patients presenting with atrial fibrillation.

af: impact on present and future national health over 2 million people in the united states have atrial fibrillation, the most common sustained arrhythmia.1 that number of patients is expected to increase to 5.6 million by 2050.1 atrial fibrillation is associated with a 4-5 fold increase in the risk of stroke, 3-fold increase in the risk of heart failure and 1.5-1.9 increased risk of death.2-6 the prevalence of atrial fibrillation increases as individuals age; 5.9% of those over 65 years of age and 9% of those over 80 years are diagnosed with the arrhythmia.25 the lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation is estimated to be 1 in 4 for men and women forty years of age and older.26 the proper management of patients with af is critical due to the well-documented association with heart failure and stroke.2-6, 11, 27. the number of emergency department visits for complaints related to atrial fibrillation increased by 88% between 1993 and 2003 and now account for approximately 1% percent of all emergency department visits in the united states.7, 24 more than 65% of these atrial fibrillation visits result in hospital admission and over $6.65 billion in expenditures, including $3.88 billion for hospitalizations, $1.53 billion for outpatient treatment and nearly $240 million for prescription drugs.8, 24 patients with a primary admission diagnosis of af had a mean length of stay and hospital charge of 4 days and $7000 in 1999.28 over the past 20 years, the admission rate for atrial fibrillation has increased by 66%.29-31 the combination of increasing atrial fibrillation prevalence, unnecessarily high admission rate and emergency department crowding is likely to severely burden our healthcare system.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * ed patients 18 years and older * provide informed consent * have a documented diagnosis of af or atrial flutter on electrocardiogram or rhythm strip from an ed, prehospital provider or outside medical facility on day of enrollment. * present with signs (tachycardia, dyspnea) or symptoms (palpitations, chest pain, shortness of breath, weakness, lightheadedness, pre-syncope, or syncope) consistent with primary symptomatic af * patients whose primary complaint is not directly related to their af diagnosis (e.g. evaluation for febrile illness, gastrointestinal complaint, injury) but have a secondary complaint consistent with symptomatic af that requires ed evaluation (e.g. new af diagnosis, af associated with inadequate rate control (defined as resting heart rate greater than 100bon), af associated with heart failure symptoms, af in the setting of cva or tia, af associated with other thromboembolic complications). exclusion criteria: * patients who are under the age of 18 * previously enrolled patients * ed patients who present with complaints unrelated to their af (e.g. sprained ankle,pharyngitis) and have adequately rate (\<100 bpm at rest) or rhythm controlled-af.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation atrial flutter