total neoadjuvant therapy and organ preservation versus surgery for rectal cancer.

Conditions: Rectal Cancer; Total Neoadjuvant Treatment; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Organ Preservation; Radiotherapy Side Effect; Chemotherapy Side Effects; Chemoradiotherapy; Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; Quality of Life

Summary: this study hypothesizes that approximately 50% of rectal cancer patients can preserve their rectum using a watch-and-wait strategy if they achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response to total neoadjuvant therapy (tnt). the objective is to determine whether the complications, quality of life, and survival rates of rectal cancer patients who have achieved a complete or near-complete clinical response to tnt, followed by a watch-and-wait approach, are comparable to those of patients who undergo surgery first. additionally, the study aims to identify potential prognostic and predictive markers for rectal cancer and examine survival rates and factors influencing responses to chemoradiotherapy (crt) or tnt. the study is divided into two parts: \*\*part one:\*\* participants with ct1n1, t2-t3 n0-1 rectal cancer, mrf-, and emvi-, with surgery as one of the possible first-line treatment options, will be randomized into two groups. the experimental group will consist of participants receiving tnt, including crt and consolidation chemotherapy (ch). if these participants achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response, they will be observed using a watch-and-wait strategy, which is a non-operative approach. the control group will consist of participants who undergo surgical treatment initially. \*\*part two:\*\* all participants with rectal cancer who have received crt or tnt will be included. additionally, participants diagnosed with rectal cancer who are scheduled for crt or tnt but declined to participate in part one or do not meet the inclusion criteria will also be included.


Eligibility criteria:
part one inclusion criteria: * over 18 years of age. * participants who agreed to participate in the study signed an informed consent form. * the eastern cooperative oncology group (ecog) score ranges from 0 to 2. * pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma. * tumor up to 10 cm from the anus. * magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of the pelvis and computed tomography (ct) of the thorax and abdomen were performed to confirm the diagnosis. * ct1n1, t2-t3 n0 - 1, m0, mrf -, emvi -. * normal bone marrow function: blood leucocytes \> 3.5 × 10⁹/l, neutrophils \> 1.5 × 10⁹/l, platelets \> 100 × 10⁹/l. * normal renal function: creatinine within 1,5 × normal. * normal liver function: blood bilirubin levels within 1,5 times normal, ast, alt levels within 2,5 times the upper limit. exclusion criteria: * prior st or ch. * participants who are not eligible for pelvic mri. * participants who have had a malignancy in the last 5 years, except for treatment for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer. * ecog status ≥ 3. * distant metastases detected. * participants with uncontrolled therapeutic or psychiatric conditions. * infectious diseases requiring antibiotic treatment. part two inclusion criteria: * over 18 years of age. * participants who agreed to participate in the study signed an informed consent form. * ecog score between 0 and 2. * pathological confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma. * stage i to iii rectal cancer confirmed. * the tumor is localized up to 12 cm from the anus. * participants who refused to participate in the first part of the study or did not meet the inclusion criteria for the first part. * participants have received preoperative crt or tnt or are in the planning stages of neoadjuvant treatment. exclusion criteria: * new cancer two years after crt. * stage iv cancer before treatment. * participants refusing to participate in the study or unable to sign the informed consent.

Keywords: rectal cancer total neoadjuvant treatment neoadjuvant therapy radiotherapy chemotherapy chemoradiotherapy organ preservation radiotherapy side effect chemotherapy side effects quality of lifte fatigue postoperative complications low anterior resection syndrome