enhancing men's awareness of testicular diseases (e-mat): a feasibility trial

Conditions: Testicular Diseases

Summary: hypothesis: is it feasible to conduct a definitive trial to test the effect of e-matvr compared to e-mate on primary and secondary outcomes among gaelic athletic association (gaa) members (players and coaches)? the overall aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to test the effect of an educational intervention to enhance men's awareness of testicular diseases using virtual reality (e-matvr) among male gaa members. the effect of e-matvr will be compared to e-mate (control) which involves using the same information as e-matvr delivered as plain text (e.g., pdf) with still images from e-matvr.

1. overall aim to examine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to test the effect of e-matvr (intervention) compared to electronic information only, e-mate (control) on testicular knowledge and testicular self-examination behaviours among male gaelic athletic association (gaa) members (i.e., players and coaches) over three months. 2. design according to eldridge and colleagues, "feasibility study" is an umbrella term including randomised/non-randomised pilot studies and/or other feasibility studies aimed to determine whether a definitive trial can be done, should be done, and if so, how? to answer these questions, we the investigators will conduct a feasibility study comprising a feasibility trial, a study within a trial (swat), process evaluation and economic evaluation. this registration only contains the detailed description of the protocol for the feasibility trial. a study within a trial (swat) will be conducted prior to the feasibility trial to determine which recruitment method (twitter, facebook or quick response \[qr\] code \[via distributed leaflet\]) is more efficient and cost effective for recruiting men to this feasibility study. a protocol for the swat is available in the swat repository hosted at queen's university belfast (insert once available). a mixed- method process evaluation will be conducted to explore participants' experiences of e-matvr and e-mate and potential sources of intervention failure. a protocol for the process evaluation is available in hrb open research (insert once available) an economic evaluation will also be conducted to compare incremental costs and benefits of e-matvr with e-mate. a cost-benefit analysis will be employed whereby the costs and benefits will be measured in monetary terms. data for the economic evaluation will be collected within the outcomes measures for the feasibility trial at t1 (immediately post-test) and t2 (three months follow up). 3. objectives 1. negotiate access with key stakeholders. 2. identify unforeseen problems and safety issues. 3. examine randomisation and blinding processes. 4. provide estimates for sample size calculation for definitive trial. 4. design randomised feasibility trial. 5. participants 5.1 inclusion criteria 1. biological males 2. members of the target gaa clubs since testicular injuries are common in field sports like hurling. 3. residing in ireland. 4. aged 18-50 years (age group at risk for testicular diseases). 5.2 exclusion criteria 1. history of seizures. 2. history of motion sickness. 6. setting data will be collected in up to 12 geographically dispersed gaa clubs, including "healthy club" https://www.gaa.ie/my-gaa/community-and-health/healthy-club/). 7. intervention intervention described below using the template for intervention description and replication (tidier) checklist. 7.1 brief name e-matvr. 7.2 why? limitations from the investigators previous research were (i) the inclusion of men from one university; (ii) short follow-up time; (iii) lack of randomisation/control group; (iv) lack of an economic evaluation; and (v) lack of process evaluation. these will be addressed in this project. 7.3 what? e-matvr is a computer software uploaded onto vr technology and delivered using a headset, handheld controllers, and voiceover (all wireless). the voiceover script is based on evidence from the investigators prior research and the preconscious awareness to action theoretical framework. the script's readability score (83.4 on the flesch-kincaid test) indicates its suitability for sixth graders. e-matvr comprises three gaming levels and takes approximately 10min to complete. the user is required to complete one area to move to the next area. e-matvr begins with a popping series of words (like opening movie credits) as the voiceover reads them out. these include light-hearted synonyms for the testes (e.g., balls, nuts, gonads). the word "nuts" rather than "testes" is used to engage men with this intimate/sensitive topic. * area 1 involves a 3d space with two walnuts. the user is asked by the voiceover to move around the walnuts using the controllers, while providing facts about the normal size and shape of the testes. three changes (lump, swelling, and pain \[represented as flashing light\]) then appear consecutively. these are accompanied with a humorous emotional response from the voiceover. the user must find all three changes to move to the next level. * area 2: a 3d model of a testis is used and the spermatic cord, epididymis, and tumour are represented. the user is loaded into level 2 on top of the testis. during this level, the voiceover links symptoms experienced in level 1 to testicular structures. the spermatic cord lights up to indicate testicular torsion and a purple lump appears, indicating a growth. * area 3: key messages are reiterated by the voiceover using three icons: (i) a snowflake to remind participants that their testes are unique and highlight the importance of knowing what is normal for them; (ii) an infographic with the method for testicular self-examination; and (iii) a red cross to prompt participants to seek help for abnormalities and seek immediate attention for severe testicular pain. 7.4 who provided? e-matvr was developed by mr eoghan cooke (collaborator and research assistant) within an msc in interactive media supervised by mr david murphy (co-applicant). a research assistant (mr billy o'mahony) with interactive media expertise will test e-matvr. 7.5 how? e-matvr is delivered using the latest vr technology (oculus quest 2 https://www.oculus.com/quest-2/) to give users a life-like experience, with imbedded headphones and controllers that provide vibrational (haptic) feedback based on participants' actions. the use of vr is explained, and participants are exposed to a brief demonstration to practice the use of the technology. participants are then exposed to e-matvr. 7.6 where? e-matvr (wireless) will be tested in the target gaa clubs. 7.7 when? participants will complete e-matvr once. e-matvr takes approximately 10min to complete. 7.8 how much? the number of vr users worldwide was 171 million in 2018, as compared to 200,000 in 2014. worldwide spending on vr and augmented reality will grow between 2019-2023, achieving a compound annual growth rate of 77% and delivering a 294 billion usd boost to global gross domestic product by supporting education and training. vr device ownership and purchase intent are highest among men aged 18-39yrs. the surge in vr use led to significant price drops. high-quality vr equipment is available for €138-€462 (https://www.oculus.com/compare/). 7.9 tailoring/modifications should a newer vr technology emerge, the e-matvr software can be readily transferred in full onto it. 7.10 how well? user-friendliness, acceptability, and effectiveness (one-group pre-post pilot) of e-matvr were tested with 68 university students. participants perceived e-matvr as fun, innovative, informative, memorable, and user-friendly. e-matvr was successful in increasing men's knowledge of testicular diseases, intentions to seek help for symptoms, and testicular self-examination behaviours. 8. control e-mate (e for electronic information) will serve as the control arm. it involves using the same information as e-matvr delivered as plain text (e.g., pdf) with still images from e-matvr. participants will be given 10min to read the text/look at images using an ipad. 9. outcomes 9.1 primary outcomes 1. testicular knowledge (dichotomous) 2. testicular self-examination behaviours (dichotomous) 9.2 secondary outcomes 1. testicular awareness (likert scale) 2. help-seeking intentions (likert scale) 3. implementation intentions (likert scale) 4. perceived risk of testicular disorders (likert scale) outcomes will be measured at baseline (t0), immediately post-test (t1), and three months post-test (t2) using the castor edc software (https://www.castoredc.com/). a research assistant and/or research support officer will be present to ensure participant safety. there is no in-person follow-up. participants will be contacted (phone call/text message/email) to ensure completion of outcome measurement at t2. non-respondents and those who withdraw will be considered lost to follow-up. retention is key to ensuring power and internal validity. this will be addressed in the swat described below. 10. sample size given that the goal of a feasibility trial is to identify problems that would impede the conduct of a larger, definitive efficacy trial, the investigators set the sample size at 59 based on advice from viechtbauer et al. (2015) which is aimed at being able to detect failures in study processes that would occur just 5% of the time (with 95% confidence). bearing in mind a potential attrition rate of 25%, 74 participants will be recruited. 11. randomisation and allocation concealment for each of the participating gaa clubs, individual participants will be randomised with the same probability to one of the two arms (e-matvr/e-mate). allocation concealment will be maintained using a computerised system. once participants have consented and their baseline assessment has been entered into the computer database, their allocation will be given by automated email. randomisation and allocation concealment will be conducted according to the standard operating procedures (sops) of the statistics and data analysis unit of the hrb clinical research facility-cork (hrb crf-c). 12. blinding given the differences between the two arms, participants will be aware of the arm they have been randomised into. outcome assessments will be self-reported and returned to research staff with no information on allocation. blinding will be maintained throughout data analysis. unblinding will be facilitated by the independent statistician following completion of the protocol-specified data analysis. 13. data analysis analyses will be conducted by the lead statistician, under the sops of the statistics and data analysis unit of the hrb crf-c. before recruitment, a detailed statistical analysis plan will be uploaded alongside the study protocol to the relevant registries. data will undergo extensive quality checking and potential errors will be verified from source data a priori. analyses of outcomes will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. differences in outcomes by study arm, over time, will be estimated using generalised linear mixed effects models with the appropriate link function (based on the distribution of the outcome or expected error distribution). the investigators will report minimally adjusted models, which will include effects of intervention arm and time. the investigators will report a fully adjusted model that includes the key predictor variables collected at baseline. missing data will be evaluated and addressed using appropriate methods (e.g., multiple imputation or inverse-probability weighting). effect estimates for all pre-specified primary and secondary endpoints, will be publicly reported with 95%ci and exact p-values, in accordance with recent guidance from the american statistical association. analyses will be conducted using transparent, open-science tools. all analysis steps, including cleaning or modifications to study database, will be fully scripted and replicable. scripts for the key analyses will undergo testing prior to data analysis. upon completion, the study database will be prepared according to fair data principles and be made available along-side the analysis scripts. 14. ethical considerations this study will be conducted in line with ethical principles depicted in the declaration of helsinki. ethical approval will be sought from the clinical research ethics committee at ucc. participants will be provided with an information leaflet and will sign informed consent. participants will be asked to check with their general practitioner for abnormalities (e.g., lump) identified during testicular self-examination. participants will also be asked to visit the emergency department for sudden and severe testicular pain which is often associated with emergencies such as testicular torsion.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. biological males. 2. members of the target gaa clubs (gaa players and coaches) since testicular injuries are common in field sports like hurling. 3. residing in ireland. 4. aged 18-50 years (age group at risk for testicular diseases). exclusion criteria: 1. history of seizures. 2. history of motion sickness.

Keywords: testicular diseases technology athletes knowledge social media virtual reality