comparing different treatments in reducing dissociative seizure occurrence

Conditions: Convulsion, Nonepileptic; Conversion Disorder; Dissociative Disorder

Summary: the study will test the hypothesis that cognitive behavioural therapy plus standardised medical care (smc) will have greater clinical and cost effectiveness than smc alone in treating adult patients with dissociative seizures which had not initially ceased after diagnosis. about 12-20% of patients who attend neurology or specialist epilepsy clinics because of seizures do not in fact have epilepsy. most of these people have what are referred to as dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures (ds). this means that they have episodes that resemble epileptic seizures but which have no medical reason for their occurrence and instead are due to psychological factors. in younger adults ds are about four times more common in women than men. a high percentage of these people will have other psychological or psychiatric problems and may have other medically unexplained symptoms. it is generally thought that people with ds will benefit from psychological treatments. however, studies on this have been small or have not compared the psychological therapy with the treatment people normally receive (standardised medical care). there is some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (cbt), which is a widely accepted talking therapy that focuses on the person's thoughts, emotions and behaviour, as well as considering the physical reactions and sensations that may occur in people's bodies, may lead to a reduction in how often people have ds. the investigators have previously developed a cbt package for people with ds. in a relatively small study by our group, published in 2010, people receiving cbt overall showed greater reduction in how often they had their ds. the investigators are now conducting a larger study, across several different hospitals, to obtain more definite results about the effectiveness of our cbt approach for ds. the investigators aim to invite \~ 500 adult patients with ds (but without current active epilepsy), who have been given their diagnosis by a neurologist or specialist in epilepsy, to take part in their study. up to 698 might be invited if insufficient patients are progressing to the rct. the investigators will collect initial information about these people and ask them to keep a record of how often they have their ds following diagnosis. three months after the diagnosis, those who have agreed to take part in the study will be seen by a psychiatrist, who will undertake a psychiatric assessment and ask them about factors which may have led to the development of their ds. patients who have continued to have ds in the previous 8 weeks and who meet other eligibility criteria and are willing to take part in the trial, will be randomly allocated to standardised medical care or cbt (plus standardised medical care) as further treatment for their seizures. these people will be asked to continue to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires, provide regular seizure frequency data following receipt of ds diagnosis and will need to be willing to attend weekly/fortnightly sessions if allocated to cbt. the investigators initially aim to randomise 298 people (149 to each study arm) although now allow for up to 356 to account for loss to follow-up.

there is an initial observational phase to this study followed by a parallel group, two-arm multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (interventional phase). in the observational phase patients will be given their diagnosis of dissociative seizures by a neurologist/epilepsy specialist and will be told about the codes study. in addition to a leaflet on dissociative seizures they will, if interested in the study and are willing to be referred to a psychiatrist, be given an information sheet about ds and about the study and the doctor will document their agreement to be contacted by a research nurse/worker. this person will arrange to contact them, clarify study details, obtain informed consent, collect demographic details and explain seizure diary recording. they will then contact the patient fortnightly (bi-weekly)for seizure data. the investigators initially aim to recruit \~500 patients at this stage. after 3 months the patient will be reviewed by a neuropsychiatrist/ liaison psychiatrist/ psychiatrist with interest in ds who will undertake a clinical assessment, review the patient's eligibility for the interventional phase of the study and if eligible will explain the rct. patients will be given a further leaflet on ds and a participant information sheet and the psychiatrist will document interested patients' willingness to again be contacted by a research nurse/worker. that person will then explain the rct in greater detail, obtain informed consent, undertake a baseline assessment including a mini and instruct patients to keep seizure records for which data will be collected fortnightly. .randomisation of between 298 and 356 people (depending on follow-up rates) to either cbt plus standardised medical care (smc) or to smc alone will occur after informed consent has been obtained and baseline measures have been collected. the stratification factor will be liaison/neuropsychiatry centre. the research workers and trial statistician will remain blinded. computer-generated randomisation will be conducted remotely (for more details see www.ctu.co.uk - randomisation - advanced) by the king's clinical trials unit (kctu) at the institute of psychiatry, psychology and neuroscience. the investigators will maintain strict allocation concealment. the investigators will test the rws' blinding by asking them to record when they think that allocation was revealed and record the group to which they thought patients had been allocated. cbt will be delivered over 12 sessions (each approximately one hour in length) over a 4-5 month period with one booster session at 9 months post randomisation. the investigators' treatment model has been developed from a single case study, trialled in an open label study and then in a pilot rct. the model is based on the two-process fear escape-avoidance model and conceptualises ds as dissociative responses to cues (cognitive/emotional/physiological or environmental) that may (but not in all cases) have been associated with profoundly distressing or life-threatening experiences, such as abuse or trauma, at an earlier stage in the person's life and which have previously produced intolerable feelings of fear and distress. written handouts supplement the content of face-to face therapy sessions. the investigators will record therapy sessions and undertake treatment fidelity ratings. therapists will receive training prior to treating study patients. neurologists and psychiatrists with an interest in ds will deliver standardised medical care (smc). they will have guidelines as to the delivery of standardised medical care. information leaflets will be given to the patients. the research team will provide this material. smc by psychiatrists will include support, consideration of psychiatric comorbidities and any associated drug treatment and general review but no cbt techniques. the investigators allow for some local variation in the number of neurology and psychiatry smc sessions after randomisation. measures will be recorded at baseline, six months and 12 months post randomisation. in addition to quantitative analyses, a nested qualitative study will investigate experiences of cbt and smc and factors acting as facilitators and barriers to participation, as well as of healthcare professionals'.experiences of delivering the study.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. the inclusion criteria applied at the initial recruitment stage will be as follows: * adults (≥18yrs) with ds that have continued to occur within the previous 8 weeks and have been confirmed by video eeg telemetry or, where not achievable, clinical consensus; patients who have chronic ds can be included if they have been seen by the relevant study neurologist who has reviewed their diagnosis and communicated this to them according to the study protocol * ability to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires; * willingness to complete seizure diaries regularly and undergo psychiatric assessment 3 months after ds diagnosis; * no documented history of intellectual disabilities; * ability to give written informed consent. 2. inclusion criteria evaluated at the randomisation stage will be as follows: * adults (≥18yrs) with ds initially recruited at point of diagnosis; * willingness to continue to complete seizure diaries and questionnaires; * provision of regular seizure frequency data following receipt of ds diagnosis; * willingness to attend weekly/fortnightly sessions if randomised to cbt * both clinician and patient think that randomisation is acceptable * ability to give written informed consent. exclusion criteria: the exclusion criteria applied at the initial recruitment stage will be as follows: * having a diagnosis of current epileptic seizures as well as ds. patients with both ds and es have been included in small studies but there is no method for verifying that patients can accurately differentiate between epileptic seizures and ds; * inability to keep seizure records or complete questionnaires independently; * meeting dsm-iv criteria for current drug/alcohol dependence; * insufficient command of english to later undergo cbt without an interpreter or to complete questionnaires independently. reasons for this include the need to self-rate secondary outcomes using scales not validated for non-english speaking populations, the considerable cost and uncertainty of being able reliably to engage sufficiently competent interpreters, and the need to demonstrate the delivery of therapy in terms of quality and manual adherence. * having previously undergone a cbt-based treatment for dissociative seizures at a trial participating centre * currently having cbt for another disorder, if this will not have ended by the time that the psychiatric assessment takes place. exclusion criteria evaluated at the randomisation stage will be as follows: * current epileptic seizures as well as ds, for reasons given above; * not having had any ds in the 8 weeks prior to the psychiatric assessment, 3 months post diagnosis; * having previously undergone a cbt-based treatment for dissociative seizures at a trial participating centre * currently having cbt for another disorder * active psychosis; * meeting dsm-iv criteria for current drug/alcohol dependence; this may exacerbate symptoms/alter psychiatric state and health service use and affect recording of seizures; * current benzodiazepine use exceeding the equivalent of 10mg diazepam/day; * the patient is thought to be at imminent risk of self harm, after (neuro)psychiatric assessment or structured psychiatric assessment by the research worker with the mini, followed by consultation with the psychiatrist. * known diagnosis of factitious disorder

Keywords: dissociative seizures, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures