post gingival depigmentation assessment: comparison of surgical stripping vs (er,cr:ysgg) laser

Conditions: Pigmentation; Gingiva

Summary: the appearance and health of the gingiva significantly contribute to an aesthetically pleasing smile. pink gingiva indicates healthy gums and is generally preferred over dark or mixed colors. however, gingival color varies among individuals based on factors such as race, geography, gum health, epithelial thickness, vascular supply, keratinization level, and pigments in the epithelium layers. four primary pigments define mucosa color: melanin, oxygenated hemoglobin (hb), carotenoids, and reduced hb. melanin notably affects excessive gingival pigmentation. gingival melanin hyperpigmentation, sometimes called racial pigmentation, is a genetic trait present in many ethnic groups due to excess melanin deposition in the epithelial layers. while not a medical concern, this hyperpigmentation can be unattractive, especially for those with a gummy smile. as a result, many seek treatments to reduce or eliminate this pigmentation. various methods for gingival depigmentation exist, including surgical scraping, scalpel technique, bur abrasion, free gingival graft, gingivectomy, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, chemical treatments, and lasers. a significant challenge with these treatments is gingival repigmentation or the reappearance of melanin post-procedure. for years, the scalpel technique was the standard. it's a straightforward and economical method that involves removing the gingival epithelium and some underlying tissue. although it promotes quick healing, the procedure can cause bleeding, necessitating local anesthesia and post-operative dressings. due to the associated discomfort, researchers have sought equally effective alternatives. laser ablation has become a popular choice among dental professionals and patients. lasers like carbon dioxide (co2), diode, argon, ruby, nd:yag (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) , and er:yag (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) have been proven effective through numerous studies. lasers present benefits such as minimal post-operative pain, ease of use, and quicker treatment times. recurrence rates post-laser surgery (1.16%) are lower than with the scalpel technique (4.25%). however, lasers also have downsides, including high costs, potential for thermal damage, and the risk of deep penetration. one laser, the erbium-chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (er,cr:ysgg), has been fda-approved for certain dental procedures but hasn't been widely used for gingival depigmentation. preliminary findings suggest it offers advantages like reduced pain and faster healing compared to other lasers. in a case study involving two patients, the er,cr:ysgg laser effectively removed gingival pigmentation, with no recurrence observed after six months. this clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recurrence rates between the conventional scalpel technique and the er,cr:ysgg laser technique. the hypothesis suggests that the er,cr:ysgg laser might be a superior treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation compared to other methods.


Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * over 18 years of age * periodontally healthy subjects with concerns about their esthetics and presence of gingival hyperpigmentation in the upper arch exclusion criteria: * (1) smokers or were previous smokers * (2) had a systemic disease/condition, * (3) were pregnant/lactating * (4) had gingivitis, periodontitis or any other periodontal disease * (5) acquired amalgam pigmentation were excluded from the study

Keywords: gingival pigmentation depigmentation er,cr:ysgg laser