virtual care strategies to improve participation in cardiac rehabilitation among veterans

Conditions: Cardiovascular Diseases

Summary: home-based cr (hbcr) is an alternative to traditional cr programs that has comparable efficacy in improving morbidity/mortality and increases access to critical services. there is major potential to improve veteran engagement in cr by combining digital coaching (d-coaching) with existing va-supported technologies. the investigator's theory-based intervention targets a critical component of successful cr engagement that is not available through traditional programs: virtual social support through a social network. in addition, the investigators propose to improve self-efficacy and self-regulation through interactive digital multi-media education, personalized feedback, and motivation so that veterans can complete the prescribed hbcr program and maintain physical activity long-term. this rct will evaluate the effects of hbcr alone (usual care) versus hbcr + d-coaching, including a private group with direct messaging on the connecteam mobile application and bimonthly engagement sessions via va video connect. the investigators will randomly assign 150 veterans from 2 hbcr programs to a 3-month intervention. the addition of d- coaching to existing digital technologies will be operationalized by using a private social media group to provide social support, education, personalized feedback, and motivation. the investigators aim to determine the effect of the d-coaching intervention on: a) the number of completed hbcr sessions over 3 months, b) functional capacity, c) physical activity, c) psychosocial outcomes, d) clinical outcomes, and e) social cognitive factors of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and perceived social support over 6 months. the investigators will also evaluate the extent to which self-efficacy, self-regulation, and perceived social support mediate the effect of the intervention on function and physical activity.

underutilization of cardiac rehabilitation (cr). cardiovascular disease (cvd) is the leading cause of mortality for adults in developed countries, including veterans. despite the guideline recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation (cr) for patients with qualifying cardiovascular conditions, participation rates have been dismal over the decades without significant improvement, both within va and non-va programs. only 16.3% of medicare patients and 10.3% of veterans participated in center-based cr (cbcr) between 2007 and 2011 after hospitalization for mi, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. participation in cr is especially low for older adults (medicare beneficiaries), veterans, women, and individuals from underserved populations. completion of cr programs is also a major problem as 24% and 50% of participants drop-out from cr programs. barriers for cbcr participation and adherence include considerable travel burden, co-pay for non-vha programs, time away from work, or being the primary caregiver for children or older adults. home-based cr (hbcr) and hybrid cr programs (combination of cbcr and hbcr) are alternative approaches to promote exercise and provide education that have been traditionally provided in cbcr. hbcr programs have been studied in depth showing equivalency to cbcr without increased adverse events. however, although the provision of hbcr has alleviated some of the barriers related to cbcr participation, barriers to participation in hbcr include: lack of peer social support, safety concerns for patients at higher risk, lack of face-to-face monitoring and communication, and less patient accountability. while completion rates are marginally higher for hbcr programs than center-based programs, less than half (48%) of veterans participating in the investigator's sfvamc hbcr program completed at least nine sessions, well above the va average of 13%. home-based cr in the va system. across the va, only 28% of vamcs (35/124) have a cbcr program, and low participation is a significant problem with only 8.4% of veterans participating in at least one session of cbcr at a va or non-va contracted site. a growing number of alternative hbcr and hybrid programs now exist in the va health system after a recent initiative by the office of rural health (orh) to sponsor the expansion of 30 alternative programs nationally. in addition, there have been accelerated efforts by va cbcr programs to improve access to cr services remotely (equivalent to hbcr) due to the limits on in-person care from the covid-19 pandemic. va program evaluations have shown veterans preferred hbcr compared to cbcr, and veterans hospitalized at a facility with a hbcr program were 3 to 4 times more likely to participate in hbcr compared to any cbcr program.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. 21 years of age 2. history of cardiovascular disease that qualified participant for cr (mi, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, valve surgery) 3. referral to participate in home-based phase ii cr. exclusion criteria: 1. participation in center-based phase ii cr. 2. cognitive impairment (per mini-cog) 3. lack of english proficiency/literacy (digital coaching will be conducted in english. participants will need to speak/read english to receive intervention.) 4. unstable clinical conditions (e.g., unstable arrhythmias or heart block, active infection, uncontrolled hypertension, decompensated heart failure, unstable angina, etc.)

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases cardiac rehabilitation telemedicine telerehabilitation veterans