behavioural development, long-term outcomes and opportunities to optimize youth mental health trajectories

Conditions: Depression - Major Depressive Disorder; Bipolar; Psychosis; Eating Disorder NOS; ADHD; Substance Use Disorder (SUD); OCD

Summary: behavioural development, long-term outcomes and opportunities to optimize youth mental health (bloom) is a project that aims to overcome age and diagnostic boundaries to generate person-specific longitudinal profiles of mental health in youth aged 9 to 25. the overarching objective is to lay the informational foundation to accurately predict both clinical outcomes and opportunities to optimize health trajectories. this project will recruit youth in need without any mental health diagnosis and follow them annually for 5 years. the present study includes assessment of antecedents, opportunities and outcomes that will establish eligibility for preventive interventions

we propose an accelerated longitudinal study design that allows covering a long developmental period (9 to 25 years) in a short study time (5 years follow-up). youth and family caregivers will be recruited from various sources and followed-up annually for the first five years. beyond this 5-year period, further follow-ups will depend on continued study funding and may be either annual or less frequent (e.g. every 3-4 years), and either interview-based or restricted to administrative data. the present study includes assessment of antecedents, opportunities and outcomes that will establish eligibility for preventive interventions; any randomised intervention studies based on this cohort will be based on the outcome for specific reb submissions in the future. predicting the onset of dmds using a set of readily accessible antecedents we hypothesise that youth who develop dmds will have higher severity and frequency of antecedents compared to those who do not develop this outcome. we anticipate that a clinically meaningful prediction (i.e., with accuracy 80% or more said to be good or excellent, while less than 60% is deemed not meaningful; many existing predictors perform at 60-80% range9) of dmds can be made with the set of readily measurable antecedents. we will estimate the strength of antecedent-outcome relationship separately in the two (help-seeking or non help-seeking) subgroups. while we expect variations in the rates of outcomes (help-seeking \> non-help seeking), we hypothesise that the relationship between antecedents and dmds will be similar across the groups with no major drop in the ability to predict outcome in any subgroup (i.e. \>60% accuracy in each, below which prediction is unlikely to be of any clinical benefit59). relationship between predictive antecedents, resilience and biobehavioural markers in the consenting subsample, we will assess if the polygenic risk of individual disorders/pathways and summary measures of brain health (age-appropriate structure, chemisty, function) differ between those who develop dmds and those who do not. we will subsequently test if measures with highest effect size differences, if any, will improve the accuracy (discrimination index) for outcome prediction by at least 10% to assess their suitability for routine clinical implementation. of note, we propose this study as a part of a longer program whose first phase will be for 5 years duration. we anticipate following up this cohort for a longer period in phase 2, and embedding clinical trials in the cohort in future (not described here).

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: youth between 9 to 25 years of age at inclusion, who are able to read and understand either french or english, with at least one parent or legal guardian available to consent for those under 18 years of age. specific eligibility criteria: help-seeking group: at least one help-seeking contact made with a primary care clinical service provider or agency (e.g, paediatric/family physician clinic, clsc or aire ouverte) for a mental health concern (i.e., clinical needs). non help-seeking group: at least one of the birth parents or siblings have received psychiatric care for a diagnosis of dmds (i.e., family needs) or being in contact with community agencies that provide youth-centred social services for food, housing, social discrimination (e.g., racialized youth, lgbtq2sia+) (i.e., social needs) or having a diagnosed chronic physical illness that is expected to require treatment for \>12 months (e.g., diabetes, asthma to name a few) (i.e., physical health needs) exclusion criteria: * due to the requirements of assessment procedures, youth who cannot communicate verbally due to known neurological conditions or intellectual disabilities will not be included. youth who are already diagnosed with one of the dmds by a physician and currently prescribed a treatment targeting the diagnosed condition (pharmacological or psychotherapeutic interventions), will not be eligible for inclusion. importantly, no one will be excluded based on sex, gender, health insurance status, ethnicity, income status, ability to travel or living arrangements. if a participant initially approached through the referral pathways for non help-seeking individuals turns out to have had at least one help-seeking contact for a mental health concern (i.e., clinical needs), the participant will still be included but classified as part of the help-seeking group. we anticipate non help-seeking referrals to satisfy more than one criteria. their occurrence and distribution will be recorded in detail as part of our assessment procedure.

Keywords: antecedents mental health prevention resilience access to care help-seeking youth in needs biomarker speech language cognition