lipoprotein(a) and progression of aortic stenosis

Conditions: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Lipoprotein(a)

Summary: this study is a prospective, observational, two arm parallel group, clinical study involving patients with measurements of lp(a) and mild to moderate aortic stenosis. a total of 1381 patients underwent measurement of lp(a) and had a diagnosis of mild to moderate, degenerative aortic stenosis between 2001 and 2020 in asan medical center. investigators selected a propensity-matched cohort of patients with lp(a) \>70 mg/dl and those with lp(a) \ 70 mg/dl versus lp(a) \< 30 mg/dl). investigators also evaluate interactions between lp(a) groups and baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables for progression of aortic stenosis.

observational and genetic studies suggest that high levels of lipoprotein(a) (lp\[a\]) increase the risk of calcific aortic valve stenosis (avs). with the advancements of novel, specific therapies targeting lp(a), there has been a growing need for clinical trials evaluating the effect of lp(a) lowering in avs. requirement of longer follow-up time, selection of target populations and estimation of effect size are challenging issues for conducting clinical trials in avs, and previous trials of statin therapy, which included patients with mild to moderate avs, showed no significant effect of lowering ldl-cholesterol on the progression of avs. although post hoc analyses of previous statin trials showed that elevated levels of lp(a) was associated with faster avs progression, lp(a) was associated with initiation but not with progression of av calcification in a population-based study including 922 individuals. because of a critical logistical challenge to randomized trials focusing the pre-calcific stages of av disease, a clinical trial testing the progression of preexisting avs is more feasible. the lp(a)frontiers cavs trial (assessing the impact of lipoprotein(a) lowering with pelacarsen (tqj230) on the progression of calcific avs; nct05646381) will determine if pelacarsen can slow down the progression of avs in patients with mild to moderate calcific avs compared to placebo. to ensure adequate power to test the hypothesis of the ongoing lp(a)frontiers cavs trial, it is important to estimate differences in progression of as according to lp(a) levels. however, such information is lacking and a well-designed prospective observational study is needed to directly compare progression of as between the target population (patients with lp(a) \>70 mg/dl) of the lp(a)frontiers cavs trial and control population (patients with mild to moderate as and lp(a) \<30 mg/dl). investigators' prospective registry, started in 2001 at asan medical center, has included all consecutive patients with measurements of lp(a) and echocardiographic diagnosis of avs. a total of 1381 patients underwent measurement of lp(a) and had a diagnosis of mild to moderate, degenerative avs between 2001 and 2020. of the 1381 patients, 831 had lp(a) level \>70 mg/dl and 186 had lp(a) level \ 70 mg/dl and those with lp(a) \ 70 mg/dl have a faster progression of avs in a propensity-matched cohort of patients with mild to moderate avs. investigators also try to evaluate interactions between lp(a) groups and baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables for progression of avs.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * mild to moderate degenerative avs aortic peak velocity greater than 2 m/s and smaller than 4 m/s * lp(a) \>70 mg/dl or \<30 mg/dl * patients must provide written informed consent exclusion criteria: * bicuspid avs * rheumatic avs * marked bradycardia, tachycardia or 2nd or 3rd degree av block * lv ejection fraction \< 40% * hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy