analysis of the efficiency of a chronic disease self-management programme in a vulnerable population in five european countries

Conditions: Chronic Disease

Summary: according to the world health organization (who), it is estimated that around 35% of women and 29% of men are affected by chronic conditions and this percentage is clearly influenced by specific risk factors, such as lifestyle indicators. the high prevalence of chronic conditions put a large burden on national budgets. the healthcare costs of chronic conditions reach 6.8% of gdp in some european countries. the economic factors are also conditioning the individuals' lifestyles, including their concerns about health and self-care as a part of their way of life. the most educated patients suffering from a chronic disorder have often better skills to manage their conditions and therefore, show better health indicators than those less educated or with lowest socioeconomic status. in addition, the former are normally more interested in participating in community-based interventions, training programmes and research actions. thus, the impact of interventions targeted to increase self-management skills and improve health condition of individuals with chronic diseases could be extremely higher in those individuals with education and socioeconomic vulnerability traits. several health education programs have shown positive effects in the self-management of chronic disease. the chronic disease self-management programme is a program based on empowering people with chronic diseases to manage and control their disease. this program has been used in several countries over the past twenty years and its effectiveness has been widely demonstrated. however, this programme has not been specifically offered to people in situations of socio-economic vulnerability. the implementation of the effichronic project, in five european countries with different health systems and socio-economic contexts, will validate the effectiveness of this program with vulnerable people with chronic diseases. indeed, the investigators believe that the benefit of interventions aimed at increasing self-management skills and improving the health status of people with chronic diseases could be greater for people with socio-economic vulnerability characteristics.


Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. person older than 18 years of age who has one of the following condition: 2. situation 1: isolated caregivers • caregiver: a person that takes care of someone with an illness. the caregiver may be a spouse or partner, sibling, adult child, other family member or friend of someone with a chronic illness. caregivers might be primary or secondary caregivers and live with or separate from the person receiving care. caregivers don´t have to suffer from a chronic disease, but they must have a vulnerability condition defined as at least one of the following criteria: * without support network or * without means of transport or limited access to it (without private car and without public transport near to the place of residence (more than 1 km from the house)) or * digital isolation: without wifi or internet 3. situation 2: vulnerable people with a chronic disease * a chronic disease (self-reported or clinically evaluated by medical staff) according to the international classification of primary care (icpc-2): a chronic pathology with code between 70 and 99 registered in one of the 17 chapters (see annex) * chronic disease that has more than six months of evolution. * vulnerability condition, such as: * elderly people (older than 65 years of age) living alone or living in a nursing home and being in a situation of social or family isolation * ethnic minorities (travellers - gens du voyage) on a low income\* * legal immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers on a low income\*. for the asylum-seekers the domicile must be known for at least 6 months * other vulnerable persons on a low income\* even if not included in the previous target groups. * low income: below the poverty line at 60 % of median standard of living for the year 2015 (see in the annex, insee première, 2017). we consider below the poverty line at 60 % the persons that are entitled to have: revenu de solidarité active -rsa, couverture maladie universelle complémentaire - cmu-c, or allocation adulte handicapé - aah, or allocation pour demandeur d'asile - ada or allocation de solidarité aux personnes âgées-aspa. the persons that are entitled to have the pension d'invalidité are included regardless their income. for all the others types of social allowance, the revenue should be below the poverty line at 60 % of median standard of living for the year 2015 (see in the annex, insee première, 2017). 4. illiterate individuals older than 18 years of age who are in situation 1 or 2 might be included exclusion criteria: 1. - person who could not commit to a 6-months follow-up regardless of the reason 2. person living a period of crisis (domestic violence, refugees without a stable environment, eviction, etc.). 3. basic housing needs not met (homeless or roofless). 4. diagnosed with severe mental health problems (dsm v) (e.g. psychosis...) with distorted perception of reality and/or inability to function in a group. 5. cognitive decline (e.g. alzheimer´s), identified as a score from 0 to 42 on the "test your memory" test. 6. active addictive disorders (drugs, alcohol). if addiction took place in the past but at the time of inclusion the addiction is over, the person may be included 7. people without an adequate knowledge of the language of the country of residence. 8. prisoners or subjects who are involuntary incarcerated

Keywords: chronic disease prevention and control patient education as topic health services/utilization program evaluation cost-benefit analysis self-efficacy disease management health status outcome assessment (health care) self care socioeconomic factors poverty areas chronic disease self-management programme