improving quality by maintaining accurate problems in the ehr

Conditions: Asthma; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Congestive Heart Failure; Hyperlipidemia; Hypertension; Myocardial Infarction; Sickle Cell Disease; Sleep Apnea; Smoking; Stroke; Tuberculosis

Summary: the overall goal of the iq-maple project is to improve the quality of care provided to patients with several heart, lung and blood conditions by facilitating more accurate and complete problem list documentation. in the first aim, the investigators will design and validate a series of problem inference algorithms, using rule-based techniques on structured data in the electronic health record (ehr) and natural language processing on unstructured data. both of these techniques will yield candidate problems that the patient is likely to have, and the results will be integrated. in aim 2, the investigators will design clinical decision support interventions in the ehrs of the four study sites to alert physicians when a candidate problem is detected that is missing from the patient's problem list - the clinician will then be able to accept the alert and add the problem, override the alert, or ignore it entirely. in aim 3, the investigators will conduct a randomized trial and evaluate the effect of the problem list alert on three endpoints: alert acceptance, problem list addition rate and clinical quality.

the clinical problem list is a cornerstone of the problem-oriented medical record. problem lists are used in a variety of ways throughout the process of clinical care. in addition to its use by clinicians, the problem list is also critical for decision support and quality measurement. patients with gaps in their problem list face significant risks. for example, if a hypothetical patient has diabetes properly documented, his clinician would receive appropriate alerts and reminders to guide care. additionally, the patient might be included in special care management programs and the quality of care provided to him would be measured and tracked. without diabetes on his problem list, he might receive none of these benefits. in this study, the investigators developed an clinical decision support intervention that will identify patients with problem lists gaps. the investigators will alert providers of these likely gaps and offer providers the opportunity to correct them. in the first aim, the investigators will design and validate a series of problem inference algorithms, using rule-based techniques on structured data in the electronic health record (ehr) and natural language processing on unstructured data. both of these techniques will yield candidate problems that the patient is likely to have, and the results will be integrated. in aim 2, the investigators will design clinical decision support interventions in the ehrs of the four study sites to alert physicians when a candidate problem is detected that is missing from the patient's problem list - the clinician will then be able to accept the alert and add the problem, override the alert, or ignore it entirely. in aim 3, the investigators will conduct a randomized trial and evaluate the effect of the problem list alert on three endpoints: alert acceptance, problem list addition rate and clinical quality.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * all providers over the age of 18 that use the electronic health record at the specific site that the intervention is being observed. exclusion criteria: -