home- vs hospital-based care of anti-vegf treatment for diabetic macular edema: non-inferiority rct

Conditions: Diabetic Macular Edema

Summary: diabetic macular edema (dme) is a common cause of central visual loss in diabetic patients and a global public health burden around the world. most patients with dme and vision loss require pharmacological inhibition using anti-vegf agents with multiple monitoring visits that require both visual acuity testing and optical coherence tomography (oct) to determine if re-treatment is warranted as well as the recommended time interval to the next follow-up visit. however, this treatment regimen often requires monthly or every other month clinic visits, which places a substantial burden on ophthalmic clinics and patients. recently, portable self-administered home oct devices have been developed that allow for home-based oct scanning of retinal diseases, e.g., dme, although these devices do not include visual acuity determination. the investigators previously proposed to deliver home oct devices and home visual acuity tester to patients\&#39; homes to complete routine monitoring visits at home. however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this novel monitoring regimen for dme patients, specifically whether its use could reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes. this study aims to provide evidence to support use of a novel monitoring regimen for dme patients that could substantially reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes.

this visit and treatment burden is associated with poorer dme treatment outcomes in the clinical practice (real world) setting compared with outcomes in clinical trials. studies have shown that less than half of dme patients remain compliant with their anti-vegf treatment schedules in the clinical practice setting, with many experiencing worse visual acuity levels after missed appointments. potential reasons for suboptimal outcomes include under-treatment when otherwise indicated, missed visits when treatment should be applied, absence of protocol refractions and protocol visual acuity measurements which may guide treatment but be difficult to obtain in clinic, and anti-vegf costs. addressing these challenges could benefit from a novel approach of monitoring patients remotely so that visits only would be needed when treatment was warranted based on changes in best corrected visual acuity or oct central subfield thickness measurements, but only if this approach does not sacrifice visual acuity outcomes. in particular, reducing the frequency of clinic visits might improve patient compliance and potentially improve treatment outcomes. to address these challenges, new devices, which currently are not readily available around the world, and new agents or anti-vegf delivery devices have been developed to try to reduce the burden of injections without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes. however, most of these new agents that could be given q8 or q12 or q16 weeks in some study participants provided non-inferior visual acuity outcomes only in the setting of protocols that included q4week clinic assessments. potentially, this frequent monitoring may be needed to avoid sacrificing visual acuity outcomes when reducing the number of injections. furthermore, new delivery devices have been fraught with safety concerns. recently, portable self-administered home oct devices have been developed that allow for home-based oct scanning of retinal diseases, e.g., dme, namd, or cnv associated with pathologic myopia. the image quality and accuracy of retinal thickness measurements obtained from some of these devices have been validated through comparison with clinic- or hospital-based octs, although evaluation of these devices has not included home monitoring of visual acuity, nor determined if their use results in non-inferior visual acuity outcomes. in this study, the investigators will conduct a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial to determine if the mean change in visual acuity (primary outcome) is non-inferior with the home monitoring of visual acuity and oct compared with hospital/clinic-based care among dme participants receiving anti-vegf therapy, and if it is non-inferior, to determine if the home care model can reduce hospital/clinic visits over 96 weeks (principal secondary outcome). participants will receive five q4week loading anti-vegf injections after enrollment. only those participants who receive loading injections as planned will be assigned randomly to one of two groups and undergo as needed (pro-re-nata, prn) treatments with injections of anti-vegf: 1. home-based care group 2. standard hospital/clinic-based care group re-injections of anti-vegf (prn), laser, surgery or other procedures will be performed per protocol for participants from both groups.

Eligibility criteria:
participant-level criteria: inclusion criteria: to be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met: * age of 18 years or older; * type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus * current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes or current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes * travel time from home to the hospital/clinic within a 2-hour driving distance * at least one eye meets the study eye criteria listed in section 2.4 * ability and willingness to operate the self-administrated visual acuity tester and home oct device by themselves or with the help of family after training * ability and willingness to provide informed consent exclusion criteria: an individual is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present: * conditions that would preclude participation in the study, such as unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and glycemic control as determined by the investigators * history of systemic anti-vegf or pro-vegf treatment within 4 months before randomization. these drugs should not be used during the study; * in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied * blood pressure \&gt; 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110. if blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, then the individual may be eligible * history of myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months before enrollment * for women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 2 years. women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy, and the investigator will determine when a pregnancy test is needed * currently participating in other clinical trials * the individual who might move out to an area beyond 2-hour driving distance during the first 12 months of the study study eye-level criteria: the participant must have at least one eye meeting all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria listed below. participants can have only one study eye. if both eyes are eligible at the time of enrollment and one of the eyes has never received anti-vegf treatment, that eye should be included. if both eyes are eligible and have previously received anti-vegf treatment or both eyes have never received anti-vegf, then the better-seeing eye will be selected before enrollment. if neither eligible eye is the better-seeing eye, then the investigator and participant will select the study eye by mutual agreement before enrollment.the definition of better-seeing, worse-seeing and same eye is in the followings: * if the baseline visual acuity letter score in both eyes is 50 (20/100) or better, the better-seeing eye is the eye with better baseline visual acuity (better than that of the fellow eye by 5 letters or more), and the worse-seeing eye is the eye with worse baseline visual acuity (worse than that of the fellow eye by 5 letters or more); if the baseline visual acuity of one eye is within 4 letters of that of the fellow eye, the two eyes are the same and neither eye is the better-seeing eye. * if the baseline visual acuity letter score in both eyes is \&amp;lt; 50 (20/100), the better-seeing eye is the eye with better baseline visual acuity (better than that of the fellow eye by 10 letters or more), and the worse-seeing eye is the eye with worse baseline visual acuity (worse than that of the fellow eye by 10 letters or more); if the baseline visual acuity of study eye is within 9 letters of that of the fellow eye, the two eyes are the same and neither eye is the better-seeing eye. the eligibility criteria for a study eye are as follows: inclusion criteria: * central-involved dme (central subfield thickness on oct defined on heidelberg spectralis oct 320 μm or more in men and 305 μm or more in women, or zeiss cirrus oct 305 μm or more in men and 290 μm or more in women, or the equivalent on spectral-domain oct based on gender specific cutoffs) * best corrected visual acuity letter score ≤ 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and ≥ 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within seven days of inclusion * received no treatment for dme before, or received no anti-vegf injection for dme within the past 3 months; however, if there is a history of anti-vegf injections, \<=1 injection in the past year and \<=3 injections over the study participant's lifetime); or, \<=2 monthly injections within the past 3 months and \<=3 injections over the past year, and \<=6 injections over the study participant's lifetime. * sufficient media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation to allow for adequate fundus photographs and adequate oct exclusion criteria: the following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the non-study eye): * macular edema due to reasons other than diabetes * any history of prior laser, other surgical or corticosteroid treatment for dme (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal corticosteroids or peribulbar corticosteroids) within the prior 12 months * history of intravitreal anti-vegf for an ocular condition other than dme (e.g., choroidal neovascularization, central retinal vein occlusion, pdr) within the prior 6 months or anticipated need in the next 6 months * coexisting ocular diseases that might alter visual acuity during the course of the study, such as a retinal vein or artery occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory diseases, neovascular glaucoma, etc. * a substantial cataract that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more. this means that the cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if the eye were otherwise normal * history of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckling, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization * uncontrolled glaucoma * severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis.

Keywords: diabetic macular edema diabetic retinopathy aflibercept anti-vegf home care monitoring home oct best-corrected visual acuity visit burden randomized clinical trial