evaluation of anti-hemagglutinin (anti-ha) antibodies as protection from the flu in healthy people

Conditions: Influenza

Summary: background: - researchers want to know if a certain type of antibody in the blood affects whether people get influenza (the flu). they will study 2 different groups with different levels of anti-ha antibodies and expose them to the flu virus. they will study how the flu develops in a healthy person. this may lead to future studies to develop new vaccines and treatments for the flu. objective: - to study how people can be protected from flu infection. eligibility: - healthy volunteers 18 to 50 years of age. design: * participants will be screened through the use of a medical history, physical exam, and laboratory tests. * groups of 7 participants will stay in an isolation unit in a hospital for at least 9 days with no visitors. * participants will be screened again upon admission. they will also have: * ecg: soft electrodes will be stuck to the skin. a machine will record the heart s electrical signals. * echocardiogram: a small probe will be held to the chest to take pictures of the heart. * lung tests: participants will blow into a machine. * they will also have nasal fluid collected. this will be done either with a swab or with a tube of water washing out the nose. this will be done once every day. * the flu virus will be sprayed into the participant s nose. this will be done only once. * participants will complete a questionnaire on day 1 and twice a day after that for 14 days. * a medical team will watch participants 24 hours a day. they will go home after 2 days of negative flu tests. * participants will have 4 follow-up visits over 8 weeks.

the high morbidity and mortality associated with both pandemic and seasonal influenza, and the threat of new pandemic strains emerging, continues to keep influenza at the forefront of infectious disease and public health research. mean annual estimates of influenza deaths due to seasonal influenza alone, attributes 36,000 deaths in the us and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths in industrialized countries to influenza. pandemics can have an even more devastating effect, and we must continue to be prepared by making attempts to reduce the public health impact of this important virus. currently, influenza vaccination is the cornerstone of prophylaxis and most effective method available to reduce the impact of influenza on the world s population each year. data from the 2013 influenza season suggest that current seasonal vaccines held to these standards are greatly underperforming especially in those that really need protection such as the elderly, young, and infirmed. multiple factors could play a role in defining the true correlates of protection to influenza infection and disease and many of these factors are yet to be clearly defined. in our own influenza challenge study, protocol 12-i-0077, we have clearly seen evidence that not everyone with a low hai titer is susceptible to influenza, and that there must be other factors protecting certain individuals. there are many examples like this that demonstrate that there may be much more to immune protection to influenza than just anti-ha antibodies. live virus challenge studies have played an important role in defining the correlates of protection of influenza in the past, and we believe they can continue to do so in the future. since the last time a wild-type influenza challenge has been performed to investigate correlates of protection over 20 years ago, many new scientific tools and a significant increase in knowledge of the immune system have developed. in this study we will enroll participants at different hemagglutinin inhibition titer levels and evaluate this as a correlate of protection to the 2009 h1n1 while exploring the other possible correlates of protection that may be identified. this study represents the first opportunity to examine the correlates of protection of influenza in a fully validated and described wild-type virus challenge model. we believe that studies like this are an ideal use of a wild-type influenza challenge study and can lead to intelligent universal vaccine design as well as a basis to begin evaluating novel vaccine strategies in wild-type challenge studies in the future.

Eligibility criteria:
-inclusion criteria: 1. greater than or equal to 18 and less than or equal to 50 years of age. 2. agrees to not use tobacco products during participation in this study. 3. willingness to remain in isolation for the duration of viral shedding (at a minimum 9 days) and to comply with all study requirements. 4. a female participant is eligible for this study if she is not pregnant or breast feeding and 1 of the following: * of nonchildbearing potential (i.e., women who have had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation or are postmenopausal, as defined by no menses in greater than or equal to 1 year). * of childbearing potential but agrees to practice effective contraception or abstinence for 4 weeks prior to and 8 weeks after administration of the influenza challenge virus. acceptable methods of contraception include 1 or more of the following: 1) male partner who is sterile prior to the female participant s entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for the female participant; 2) implants of levonorgestrel; 3) injectable progestogen; 4) an intrauterine device with a documented failure rate of \< 1%; 5) oral contraceptives; and 6) double barrier methods including diaphragm or condom with a spermicide. 5. willing to have samples stored for future research. 6. prechallenge serum hemagglutination inhibition (hai) titer against the challenge virus of greater than or equal to 1:40 or less than or equal to 1:10 during a screening visit in protocol #11-i-0183 7. hiv uninfected. exclusion criteira: 1. presence of self-reported or medically documented significant medical condition including but not limited to: 1. chronic pulmonary disease (e.g., asthma, emphysema). 2. chronic cardiovascular disease (e.g., cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, cardiac surgery, ischemic heart disease, known anatomic defects). 3. chronic medical conditions requiring close medical follow-up or hospitalization during the past 5 years (e.g., diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, hemoglobinopathies). 4. immunosuppression or ongoing malignancy. 5. neurological and neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., cerebral palsy, epilepsy, stroke, seizures). 6. postinfectious or postvaccine neurological sequelae. 2. have close or household (i.e., share the same apartment or house) high-risk contacts including but not limited to: 1. persons greater than or equal to 65 years of age. 2. children less than or equal to 5 years of age. 3. residents of nursing homes. 4. persons of any age with significant chronic medical conditions such as: * chronic pulmonary disease (e.g., asthma). * chronic cardiovascular disease (e.g., cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, cardiac surgery, ischemic heart disease, known anatomic defects). * contacts who required medical follow-up or hospitalization during the past 5 years because of chronic metabolic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, hemoglobinopathies). * immunosuppression or cancer. * neurological and neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., cerebral palsy, epilepsy, stroke, seizures). * individuals who are receiving long-term aspirin therapy. * women who are pregnant or who are trying to become pregnant. 3. individual with body mass index (bmi) less than or equal to 18.5 and greater than or equal to 40. 4. smokes more than 4 cigarettes or other tobacco products on weekly basis. 5. complete blood count (cbc) with differential outside of the nih dlm normal reference range and deemed clinically significant by the pi. 6. chemistries in the acute care, mineral, and/or hepatic panels, and/or any of the following: lactate dehydrogenase, uric acid, creatine kinase, and total protein outside of the nih dlm normal reference range and deemed clinically significant by the pi. 7. neutropenia below 1,500 cells/mm(3) (grade 2 or greater) 8. urinalysis outside of the nih dlm normal reference range and deemed clinically significant by the pi. 9. clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram. 10. clinically significant abnormality as deemed by the pi on echocardiographic testing. 11. clinically significant abnormality as deemed by the pi on the pulmonary function test (pft). 12. recent acute illness within 1 week of admission to the isolation facility. 13. known allergy to treatments for influenza (including but not limited to oseltamivir, nonsteroidals). 14. known allergy to 2 or more classes of antibiotics (e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, or glycopeptides). 15. receipt of blood or blood products (including immunoglobulins) within 3 months prior to enrollment. 16. receipt of any unlicensed drug within 3 months or 5.5 half-lives (whichever is greater) prior to enrollment. 17. receipt of any non-influenza related unlicensed vaccine within 6 months prior to enrollment. 18. self-reported or known history of current alcoholism or drug abuse, or positive urine/serum test for drugs of abuse (i.e., amphetamines, cocaine, benzodiazepines, opiates, or metabolites, but not tetrahydrocannabinol (thc) or metabolites). 19. self-reported or known history of psychiatric or psychological issues deemed by the pi to be a contraindication to protocol participation 20. known close contact with anyone known to have influenza in the past 7 days. 21. any condition or event that, in the judgment of the pi, is a contraindication to protocol participation or impairs the volunteer s ability to give informed consent.

Keywords: influenza a hai h1n1 challenge study correlates of protection