computerized attention functions training vs. executive functions training for children with adhd

Conditions: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Summary: the goal of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of two computerized neurocognitive training programs for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (adhd) and to examine their impact on attention functions, executive functions, academic performance, and behavior. the main questions this study sought to answer were: how does attention functions training (aft) compare to executive functions training (eft) in improving cognitive abilities related to attention and executive functions in children with adhd? what are the effects of these programs on academic performance and behavior? researchers compared the outcomes of the aft group, the eft group, and a passive control group, in order to determine which program was more effective across these domains. participants completed computerized training sessions focused on attention or executive functions twice a week for nine weeks. they also underwent cognitive, academic, and behavioral assessments at baseline, after the training, and at follow-up.

this randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate and compare the effects of two distinct computerized neurocognitive training programs on children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (adhd). the two interventions, attention functions training (aft) and executive functions training (eft), were designed to target different cognitive domains. the aft program focused on improving sustained, selective-spatial, orienting, and executive attention, while the eft program aimed at enhancing working memory, cognitive flexibility, and problem-solving abilities. a total of 80 children with adhd, aged 8-13 years, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: aft, eft, or a passive control group. each training program included twice-weekly sessions over nine weeks. participants underwent comprehensive assessments at three time points: baseline (pre-intervention), immediately after the intervention, and at a three-month follow-up. the assessments covered cognitive functions, academic skills, and behavioral symptoms as reported by parents. the study employed repeated measures anova to analyze the effects of the interventions. primary outcome measures included improvements in attention and executive functions, with secondary measures focused on academic performance and parent-rated behavioral symptoms. both short-term and long-term effects were assessed to evaluate the persistence of any observed improvements.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * adhd exclusion criteria: * coexisting diagnosis of other mental illness or neurological disorder (with the exception of adhd and learning disabilities); previous serious head injury; uncorrected vision; additional developmental, sensory or motor issues; and if they are participating in other non-pharmacological treatment interventions specifically for adhd (e.g., neurofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy, etc.).

Keywords: adhd attention functions training (aft) executive functions training (eft) neurocognitive training cognitive functions adhd behavioral symptoms