pre-operative risk assessment of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery

Conditions: Surgical Site Infection; Risk Assessment; Cardiac Surgery

Summary: surgical site infections (ssi) are serious complications accounting for 20% of all the healthcare-associated infections and are considered the second most frequent type of hospital-acquired infection in europe and the united states. ssi after cardiac surgery is associated with delays to patient's discharge, readmissions and re-operations; and can result in increased hospital costs for staffing, diagnostics and treatment. risk assessment has been identified as potentially useful intervention in ssi prevention and in identifying at risk populations who may benefit from specific interventions to reduce this possible complication of cardiac surgery. however, there is currently a lack of evidence as to which risk tools are the most valid and reliable to be used in clinical practice. the investigators developed and locally validated the barts heart centre surgical infection risk (b-sir) tool to include patients with various types of cardiac surgeries and found that the b-sir tool is a better tool in predicting ssi risk compared with the existing cardiac risk tools in the study population. however, various literatures recognised that the predictive performance of a risk model tends to vary across settings, populations and periods. hence, the investigators aim to do a multi-centre validation of the newly developed b-sir tool and apply all the other tools (australian cardiac risk index and brompton and harefield infection score) to identify what tool performs best that can potentially be use for the uk population. further, the outcome of the study will be beneficial to future cardiac surgery patients to assess their risk of developing ssi and help identify those patients who may benefit from specific interventions. existing patients' data, which will be anonymised, from the participating cardiac centres will be utilised to analyse and compare the performance of each risk tools.

surgical site infections (ssi) are serious complications accounting for 20% of all the healthcare-associated infections and are considered the second most frequent type of hospital-acquired infection in europe and the united states. the incidence of ssi in england at 30-days is 8.6% for coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) and 2.2% for non-cabg operations. ssi after cardiac surgery is associated with delays to patient's discharge, readmissions and re-operations; and can result in increased hospital costs for staffing, diagnostics and treatment. risk assessment has been identified as potentially useful intervention in ssi prevention and in identifying at risk populations who may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce this possible complication of cardiac surgery. however, there is currently a lack of evidence as to which risk tools are the most valid and reliable to be used in clinical practice. the investigators developed and locally validated the barts heart centre surgical infection risk (b-sir) tool to include patients with various types of cardiac surgeries and found that the b-sir tool has a greater predictive power of ssi risk compared with the existing cardiac risk tools in the study population. however, various literatures recognised that the predictive performance of a risk model tends to vary across settings, populations and periods. verification of the robustness and generalisability of a developed model is highly recommended in one or more external validation studies. hence, the investigators aim to do a multi-centre validation of the newly developed b-sir tool and apply all the other tools (australian cardiac risk index and brompton and harefield infection score) to identify what tool performs best that can potentially be use for the uk population. this study is a secondary data analysis that will utilise prospectively collected data that were locally collected in 6 uk cardiac centres for the national institute for cardiovascular outcome research (nicor) and public health of england (phe) surgical site infection surveillance. data on various patients' risk factors will be collected and analysed to compare the ability of each risk assessment tool in predicting ssi after cardiac surgery. the outcome of this study will be beneficial to future cardiac surgery patients to assess their risk of developing ssi and help identify those patients who may benefit from targeted interventions.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. \>/= 18 years old at the time of surgery; and 2. had a primary surgery (cabg, valve surgery or both) in the uk cardiac centres. exclusion criteria: 1. patients undergoing grown-up congenital heart disease related surgery; 2. patients with concurrent aortovascular surgery; 3. patients who had ventricular-assist device (vad), haemolung, impellar and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ecmo) before and/or after cardiac surgery; 4. patients who had an open-chest immediately after surgery.