cross-cultural adaptation of the safety assessment scale for elderly people with a major neurocognitive disorder living at home.

Conditions: Major Neurocognitive Disorder

Summary: the main objective of this study is to adapt the canadian french version of the safety assessment scale for use in france. the safety assessment scale was developped for community healthcare providers working with elderly people with dementia who are being cared for at home, to assess the risk of accidents. the short version of the safety assessment scale is a screening tool and the longer version provides an in-depth evaluation of safety. this scale is a risk assessment grid for accidents and injuries at home for elderly people with major neurocognitive disorders, available in english and french (canadian). there are two versions: * the short version is used for screening. a score of 11 to 14 indicates a moderate risk of injury, while a score ≥ 15 indicates a high risk of injury; * the long version is used for in-depth assessment when the score on the short version indicates a moderate or high risk of injury. the questionnaire is divided into nine sections: 1. caregiver and environment, 2/smoking, 3/fire and burns, 4/nutrition, 5/food poisoning and toxic substances, 6/medication and health problems, 7/wandering and adaptation to temperature changes, 8/trauma, and 9/driving. the short version includes some of the questions from sections 1 to 7 of the long version.

secondary objectives: the other objectives of this study are to assess the test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability of the translated scale and to evaluate the internal consistency of the long version of the translated scale. conduct of research: caregivers of patients with major neurocognitive disorders included in the study will complete the adapted scale with an investigator. a pre-test phase will be carried out with 10 caregivers: the caregivers will complete the questionnaire only once with an investigator. after this phase, the translated safety assessment scale will be corrected if there are difficulties in understanding certain words or sentences. the new scale will then be evaluated on two cohorts of 53 caregivers (cohort 1: caregivers will complete the adapted scale twice with the same investigator; cohorte 2: caregivers will complete the adapted scale twice with two different investigators).

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: * patient living at home or hospitalized with a planned return home * patient with a major neurocognitive disorder (diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth version) : * evidence of significant cognitive decline from a previous level of performance in one or more cognitive domains (complex attention, social cognition) based on : a concern by the individual, a knowledgeable informant, or the clinician about a significant decline in cognitive function ; and a deficit in cognitive performance, preferably documented by standardized neuropsychological tests or by another quantified clinical assessment * the cognitive deficits interfere with independence in daily activities. at least, assistance should be required with complex instrumental activities of daily living, such as paying bills or managing medications. * the cognitive deficits do not occur exclusively in the context of a delirium. * the cognitive deficits are not better explained by another mental disorder (e.g., major depressive disorder, schizophrenia). * patient with at least one caregiver: * reliable (no suspicion of cognitive or psychiatric disorders and/or inappropriate behavior such as manipulation or abuse) * able to answer the questionnaire (i.e., knows the patient's lifestyle) * no objection to participating in the study from the caregiver and the patient (if able to understand the study) * no objection to guardian participation for patients under guardianship or curatorship exclusion criteria: * patient totally socially isolated or without a reliable caregiver * bedridden patients * for hospitalized patients, no planned return home * patients under judicial protection

Keywords: safety dementia reliability validity screening