fertishare evaluation

Conditions: Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology

Summary: sharing bad news (sbn) is a daily challenge for fertility staff and patients. bad news happens at all stages of fertility care and includes e.g., diagnosing infertility, reporting unexpected, repeated, or definitive treatment failure. extensive evidence shows that sbn triggers stress in staff due to anticipation of negative emotions and evaluations or, in extreme cases, even complaints and lawsuits. inability to manage bad news can increase negative emotions in patients and fuel distrust, potentially leading to treatment discontinuation. efficient sbn training exists but does not address challenges of sbn in fertility care, does not meet fertility staff training and patient care preferences, and its impact on patients is unclear. fertishare is a brief, evidence-based, e-learning sbn course bespoke for fertility care. the aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing fertishare at fertility clinics and of implementing an online multi-centre rct to determine fertishare's efficacy. this will allow to conclude if fertishare should proceed to efficacy evaluation. an international interdisciplinary stakeholder group (patients, consultants, embryologists, nurses, psychologists, digital educators) will inform all aspects of the proposed project.

the aim of the feasibility study is to make a fully informed decision about whether fertishare should proceed to efficacy evaluation. this aim will be achieved by resolving uncertainties about implementing fertishare at fertility clinics and about running an online multi-centre efficacy rct for fertishare. design: pre-registered, online, multi-centre, two-arm, triple-blinded (staff, patients, data analysts), feasibility rct with 1:1 computer-generated randomized allocation to the intervention (fertishare) or minimal sbn information control (20 mins sbn lecture emulating what most staff would receive as part of general training) groups. the trial will include a process evaluation and adopt a pragmatic attitude to maximise the applicability of findings to fertility care practice (beyond the immediate trial setting). examples of design choices that translate this pragmatic attitude are our choice of the control condition (emulating general sbn training that most staff will have), the inclusion of multiple staff and patient secondary trial outcomes (informed by stakeholders) and low standardisation of intervention delivery (staff will apply fertishare as they think best). criteria for progression to efficacy evaluation will be specified prior to implementation using a traffic-light system. setting: six uk-based private and public fertility clinics. participants: staff working at clinics whose role involves 10% of week time sbn. exclusion criteria are being unable to undergo training. patient inclusion criteria are having received bad news from participating staff within last month. no exclusion criteria are applied. bad news is defined as any news meaning that patients\&#39; first or second complete (fresh and frozen embryo transfers) initiated in vitro fertilization cycle did not result in a clinical pregnancy, as this is the most common challenging bad news shared by staff, and to ensure that patient outcome data (specifically continuation data) are comparable. guidance for feasibility studies to estimate participation rates, based on review of evidence from rcts conducted within sbn training and fertility care, indicates 75% of staff will be eligible and participate, but a conservative estimate of 50% will be considered to decrease unknown risk. recruiting 60 staff (10 per clinic) will allow to calculate a 50% participation rate to 95%ci of ±11%. 52% of patients will be eligible and participate. recruiting 180 patients per cohort (30 per clinic) will allow to calculate a 60% participation rate to 95%ci of ±6%.

Eligibility criteria:
fertility healthcare professionals' inclusion criteria are: * working at participating clinics; and * whose role involves a minimum of 10% of week time (half a day) sbn or being a non-clinical decision-maker (e.g., clinic/line managers). patients' inclusion criteria are • adult individuals or couples attending participating clinics to discuss or undergo (in)fertility diagnosis or treatment with participating fhps. exclusion criteria are: * not being able to read, speak or understand english; * not being able to provide consent. * for fhps only, being unable to undergo the fertishare training (e.g., visual impairments). we will not be targeting groups or individuals deemed vulnerable. potential participants are explicitly informed in the information sheet that, if they are worried about their mental health or psychological wellbeing they may chose not to participate at all. they are also advised to inform their fertility team and contact their gp in the usual way or the nhs mental health support service, www.nhs.yj/mental-health.

Keywords: sharing bad news healthcare communication assisted reproduction infertility