a patient-partnered, pan-canadian, comparative effectiveness evaluation of an acute pediatric mental health and addiction care bundle

Conditions: Mental Health; Mental Disorders; Pediatrics; Emergency Psychiatric

Summary: the investigators will determine, in an 8-site, hybrid type 1 cluster randomized effectiveness implementation trial, if an acute mental health care bundle, compared to standard care, improves wellbeing at 30 days in children and youth seeking emergency department care for mental health and substance use concerns.

the investigators we co-designed, with parents and youth, an acute mental health care bundle-a set of evidence informed practices collectively used to improve the quality of care. the bundle of care includes: 1. triage-based evaluation of risk for suicide \[ask suicide-screening questions (asq) and heads-ed, an assessment mnemonic (home; education \& employment; activities \& peers; drugs \& alcohol; suicidality; emotions \& behaviours; discharge or current resources\] 2. focused mental health team psychosocial evaluation to guide decision-making 3. choice and partnership approach (capa) to care this bundle of care also strives to remove the ed physician as the gatekeeper to mental health care and will facilitate, ideally, 24-48 hour urgent mental health follow-up (booked before the child/family leave the ed), with up to 96 hours to coordinate follow-up for patients attending the ed on weekends. primary research objective: to determine, in an 8-site, hybrid type i cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial, if an acute mental health care bundle, compared to standard care, improves wellbeing at 30 days in children and youth seeking ed care for mental health and substance use concerns. secondary research objectives: (1) to determine if the bundle improves wellbeing, satisfaction with care, family functioning, and health care delivery; (2) to identify modifiable barriers, constraints, and enablers of bundle implementation fidelity and effectiveness; (3) to test if trial intervention effects are moderated by sociodemographic characteristics (sex, gender, ethnicity, culture, education, and socioeconomic status); and (4) to assess the cost-effectiveness of the approach.

Eligibility criteria:
inclusion criteria: 1. age 8 to 17.99 years 2. chief triage concern of at least one of the following (or comparable) mental health cedis triage categories: 1. anxiety/situational crisis and/or hyperventilation 2. bizarre/paranoid behaviour 3. concern for patient's welfare 4. depression/suicidal/deliberate self-harm 5. hallucinations/delusions 6. violent/homicidal behaviour 7. insomnia 8. pediatric disruptive behaviour exclusion criteria: 1. brought to the ed under provincial mental health legislation 2. exhibiting features of schizophrenia, schizotypal, delusional disorders, or psychosis (e.g., hallucinations/delusions complaint should be reviewed carefully for this exclusion criterion) 3. significant self-harm act (i.e., suicide attempt requiring medical clearance, excluding ideation or minor superficial wounds; e.g., laceration/puncture, overdose ingestion, etc.) 4. other co-morbid medical concerns requiring oversight and/or medical clearance from an emergency physician (e.g., confusion/disorientation, substance withdrawal, other medical complaints, etc.) 5. substance misuse/intoxication or altered level of consciousness 6. exhibiting a behavioural syndrome associated with physiologic disturbances (e.g., anorexia) children/youth will also be excluded based on language barriers: 7. language barrier (i.e., patient and parent/legal guardian must be fluent in either english or french)

Keywords: emergency psychiatric services healthcare delivery