Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 29, 2018
CBCA 6153-C(5361)
HAL-PE ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.,
Applicant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr. of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for
Applicant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX; and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
On March 14, 2018, the Board issued its decision in Hal-Pe Associates Engineering
Services, Inc. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 5361, 18-1 BCA ¶ 36,999. 
Applicant had elected to have that appeal processed under Board Rule 52, Small Claims
Procedure (48 CFR 6101.52 (2011)).  Under the small claims procedure, “A decision shall
be final and conclusive and shall not be set aside except in the case of fraud.  A decision shall
have no value as precedent.”  Board Rule 52.  
The application for Award of Fees and Other Expenses in this case was filed on
June 8, 2018.  Board Rule 30(b) states: “A party may file an application for fees and other
expenses only after the time to seek appellate review of a Board decision has expired. A party


CBCA 6153-C(5361) 2
may file an application within 30 calendar days after that date.”  As the Board’s decision
dated March 14, 2018, was final and conclusive, the period for filing an application for fees
and expenses expired thirty days from the date of the decision.   
During a conference call with the Board on September 30, 2018, applicant’s counsel
acknowledged that the application in this case was not timely filed.  Accordingly, this case
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
_____________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 6, 2010 
CBCA 1583 
XEROX CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Richard D. Lieberman and Gabriel D. Soll, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Ronald Sullivan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Austin, TX, counsel for Respondent. 
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal arises from contract number GS-25F-0062L, which was awarded to 
appellant, Xerox Corporation, by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The appeal was 
docketed by the Board on May 12, 2009. The parties negotiated a settlement; on September 
30, 2010, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that respondent has paid 
appellant all amounts required under the settlement agreement. Accordingly, this appeal is 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 23, 2021
CBCA 6595
OMRAN HOLDING GROUP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Beth L. Weisser of Fox Rothschild LLP, Philadelphia, PA; and Dirk Haire of Fox
Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Randal W. Wax, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department
of State, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 21, 2021, pursuant to CBCA Rule 12(b)(2), appellant filed a motion to
voluntarily dismiss this appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 23, 2018
CBCA 6133
XEROX CORPORATION,
      Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
   Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP, Baltimore, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this appeal and jointly request dismissal.  Accordingly, the appeal
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Kyle Chadwick         
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 11, 2014
CBCA 938
JAVIS AUTOMATION & ENGINEERING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Crishon D. Jordan of Law Offices of James Scott Farrin, Knightdale, NC, counsel for
Appellant.
Stephen R. Palmer, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior,
Sacramento, CA, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
The parties have agreed that this matter should be dismissed.  Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge


CBCA 938 2
DISMISSED: OCTOBER 17, 2012
CBCA 2881 
PALAFOX (c/o KEATING DEVELOPMENT GROUP),
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Mary E. Buxton of McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Los Angeles, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
Katharine L. Healy, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Appellant, Palafox (c/o Keating Development Group), appealed a contracting officer’s
final decision dated April 9, 2012, to this Board.  Respondent filed a motion to dismiss
alleging that the Board lacked jurisdiction because the “claim” giving rise to the final
decision was over $100,000, and was neither certified nor requested a contracting officer’s
final decision.  On October 9, 2012, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the appeal.
Accordingly, CBCA 2881 is DISMISSED.
                                                 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 19, 2021
CBCA 5961, 6322
 
MAYBERRY ENTERPRISES, LLC,
 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
James A. Sorenson and Michael R. Johnson of Ray Quinney & Nebeker P.C., Salt
Lake City, UT, counsel for Appellant.
J. Ben Summerhays and Thomas M. Cordova, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Energy, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On January 14, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion seeking to dismiss these
consolidated appeals and indicating that they have settled their underlying disputes.  The
parties’ motion is granted.  These appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each
party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney fees.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 18, 2021
CBCA 7060
TL SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Maria L. Panichelli and Karen L. Douglas of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel
LLP, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant.
Alexander C. Vincent, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this case and jointly requested dismissal with prejudice, without
costs to any party.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jerome M. Drummond    
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 27, 2018
CBCA 5584
ROBERT F. HYLAND & SONS, LLC,
           Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On November 19, 2018, appellant filed a joint request for dismissal with prejudice
of the captioned appeal based on the parties having settled their dispute.  The Board
commends the parties on the successful resolution of their dispute.  Accordingly, the
captioned appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED: October 21, 2013 
CBCA 3072
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
Brian W. Craver of Person & Craver LLP, Washington, DC, appearing for Appellant.
Kenneth R. Pakula and Sara E. McGraw, Office of General Counsel, Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BORWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 30, 2013, appellant advised the Board that the appeal has been settled
and submitted a motion to dismiss.  Pursuant to Rule 12(c), the appeal is DISMISSED.
________________________________
ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 14, 2013
CBCA 3373
DONALD HICKS, SR.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Donald Hicks, Sr., pro se, Columbus, GA.
Fallyme E. Guerrero, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Kansas City, MO, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On November 14, 2013, the appellant confirmed he had received payment pursuant
to the parties’ settlement agreement and that the case should be dismissed.  The Board
commends the parties on settling their dispute.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 9, 2023
CBCA 7223
THREE WIRE SYSTEMS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
W. Barron A. Avery of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Tobias Hunziker, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Austin,
TX; and Frank V. DiNicola and Krysta Ku, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Eatontown, NJ, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
As requested by the parties under Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2021)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 14, 2008  
CBCA 1150 
SR MANUFACTURING, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
G. Matthew Koehl of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 9, 2008, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement of this 
matter and moved to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  Pursuant to the agreement of the 
parties and Rule 12(c), this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 

                                                       
                                  
2 CBCA 1150 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 3, 2011 
CBCA 2339 
BELLO ADEJOH, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
Bello Adejoh, pro se, Festus, MO. 
Gabriel N. Steinberg, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On March 14, 2011, the Board docketed this appeal. 
The Board was advised on September 28, 2011, that the parties had reached a 
settlement in this appeal and a joint request for dismissal would be submitted subsequently. 
On November 2, 2011, the Board received the parties’ joint request that this appeal be 
dismissed with prejudice. 

 
      
______________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2339 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
____________________________ 
 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 29, 2010 
CBCA 2101 
GEORGE AWUZIE, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
George Awuzie, pro se, San Jose, CA. 
Emma Cocks, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN, Board Judge 
ORDER 
The parties have advised the Board that the issues in this appeal have been settled, 
and move that it be dismissed with prejudice. 
Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 2, 2023
CBCA 7772
ESA SOUTH, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
James E. Krause of James E. Krause, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, counsel for Appellant.
Kathleen Ramos, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
As requested by the appellant under Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2021)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 9, 2013
CBCA 3091
MATRIX BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Charles W. Mahan, Jr., Richard L. Carr, Jr., of Dunlevey, Mahan & Furry, Dayton,
OH, counsel for Appellant.
William H. Butterfield, Office of Procurement Law, U.S. Coast Guard, Department
of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The contracting officer issued a final decision on September 5, 2012.  The appellant
appealed that final decision on December 3, 2012.  Subsequently, the parties agreed that the
final decision and appeal were premature.  The contracting officer then withdrew her final
decision by letter of December 7, 2012.  The parties agree that the appeal is now moot for
lack of a contracting officer’s final decision.  The parties jointly request that this appeal of
the contracting officer’s final decision be dismissed with prejudice.  That request is granted.

CBCA 3091 2
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
                                                    
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 11, 2008 
CBCA 1212 
CHAMPION BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES, 
Respondent. 
Carol E. McCallister, President/CEO of Champion Business Services, Inc., Aurora, 
CO, appearing for Appellant. 
Nancy E. Weiss, General Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties, on August 7, 2008, filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that 
they had settled the matter. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 4, 2007 
CBCA 820 
R. B. GAY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
William Alan Reaves, Vice President of R. B. Gay Construction Co., Inc., 
Jacksonville, FL, appearing for Appellant. 
Mark R. Simpson, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta, 
GA, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
This appeal involves claims made under a contract for construction at the Lake City 
(Florida) Air Tanker Base.  Work performed by the contractor, R. B. Gay Construction Co., 
Inc. (Gay Construction), on retention ponds at the base did not meet with the satisfaction of 
the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. The Forest Service eventually had another 
contractor perform additional work on the retention ponds. Gay Construction claimed 
entitlement to the portion of the contract amount which the Forest Service had withheld to 
cover costs incurred by the other contractor, plus costs of extra work Gay Construction itself 
had done to solve the problems identified by the Forest Service before that agency had hired 
the other contractor.  The Forest Service contracting officer denied that claim and made a 

 
           
   
_________________________ 
2 CBCA 820 
claim of her own against Gay Construction for the added expense of the other contractor’s 
work. 
After the appeal was filed, the Board suggested that the parties’ representatives meet 
with experts engaged by the two sides in an effort to understand each other’s point of view 
and discuss voluntary settlement of the case. The parties followed this suggestion and 
quickly reached a settlement. Gay Construction then asked the Board to dismiss the appeal 
with prejudice to its reinstatement. 
The request is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 9, 2025
CBCA 8189
TAYLOR JANE CONSTRUCTION, L.P.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
William M. Pannier of Pannier Law, PC, Thousand Oaks, CA, counsel for Appellant.
Jack F. Gilbert and Emma R. Vyncke, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 8, 2025, appellant advised the Board that the parties had reached a settlement
and requested, without opposition, that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly,
this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 23, 2014
CBCA 3649
MELISSA BETH MENO,
Appellant,
v.
PEACE CORPS,
Respondent.
Melissa Beth Meno, pro se, Panama City, Panama.
Timi Nickerson Kenealy, Office of the General Counsel, Peace Corps, Washington,
DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 21, 2014, the parties jointly advised the Board that they had reached a
settlement and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 30, 2017
CBCA 5832
PACIFIC TECH CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Theodore M. Bailey of Bailey & Bailey, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for
Appellant.
Amy M. Siadak and Colleen Burnidge, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department
of the Interior, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 29, 2017, the Board received a timely notice of appeal from Pacific Tech
Construction, Inc. (contractor) concerning the denial of its claim under its contract,
R13PC60351, with the Department of the Interior.  As requested in a joint motion of the
parties, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
_________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 17, 2007 
CBCA 612 
GWINN CONSTRUCTION, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Gerald J. Brentnall, Jr., Loomis, CA; and Thomas M. Sullivan, Denver, CO, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Daniel L. Winand, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard, 
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN , Board Judge 
ORDER 
The parties have advised the Board that all outstanding issues in this appeal have been 
settled.  
In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 28, 2020
CBCA 6720
VT AEPCO INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
David S. Black and Amy L. Fuentes of Holland & Knight LLP, Tysons, VA, counsel
for Appellant.
Jessica G. Lockhart, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Auburn, WA, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 27, 2020, the parties filed a joint notice requesting dismissal with
prejudice of the captioned appeal based on a withdrawal of the underlying contracting
officer’s final decision.  The Board commends the parties on the successful resolution of
their dispute.  Accordingly, the captioned appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
           Jonathan D.  Zischkau        
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 19, 2023
CBCA 6683, 6762, 6919, 6920, 6921, 7025, 7026
4K GLOBAL-ACC JOINT VENTURE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
Lochlin B. Samples, Karl F. Dix, Jr., Jonathan R. Mayo, and Jeanne M. Harrison of
Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, GA; and Alexander Gorelik of Smith, Currie &
Hancock LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
José Otero, Joshua L. Caplan, C. Cleveland Fairchild, Christopher L. Sanders, and
Sejal Singh, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for
Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 17, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these appeals, which
follows the parties’ settlement of the disputes underlying them.  In accordance with the
parties’ request, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 19, 2022
CBCA 7448
SWISHER LOGGING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Scott P. Swisher, Member of Swisher Logging, LLC, Campbell Hill, IL, appearing
for Appellant.
Jacquelyn Garcia, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Milwaukee, WI, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 16, 2022, appellant filed a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to
Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2021)).  Appellant stated that the parties
executed a settlement agreement, the conditions of which have been met, and asked the
Board to dismiss the appeal.  The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke    
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 1, 2008 
CBCA 678 
INTERIMAGE, INC., 
Appellant, 
v.
 
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
Richard J. Webber of Arent Fox LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Kenneth W. Dodds, Office of General Counsel, Small Business Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On March 16, 2007, InterImage, Inc. appealed the contracting officer’s deemed denial 
of its claim for $270,217.54 plus interest, under order number SBAHQ05F0209. This order 
had been issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under multiple award schedule 
contracts GS-23F-8021H and GS-35F-5577H.  The order was for support services for the 
Office of Disaster Assistance’s organizational transformation in conjunction with its 
implementation of the Disaster Credit Management System.  

   
____________________________ 
 
2 CBCA 678 
On April 25, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with 
prejudice, stating that they had entered into a settlement agreement. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 10, 2012
CBCA 2909
PRO-TELLIGENT LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Holly A. Roth and Howard H. Yuan of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Dennis J. Gallagher, Office of the Legal Advisor, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO , Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 25, 2012, the Board received  a notice of appeal from PRO-telligent LLC
(contractor).  The contractor maintains that a contracting officer had improperly terminated
for default its contract, SAQMMA-10-C-0245, with the Department of State to provide guard
services. On October 9, the Board received a motion to dismiss with prejudice; the parties
have entered into a settlement agreement.  Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE  this appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 2, 2018
CBCA 6010
 
BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Theodore M. Bailey of Bailey & Bailey, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for
Appellant.
Joseph W. Cooch, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On May 1, 2018, appellant, Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. (BRCS), filed a
consent motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(c), 48 CFR
6101.12(c) (2017).  BRCS’s motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
Harold D. Lester, Jr.
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 2, 2021
CBCA 6372
BRIGGS BROTHERS ENTERPRISES CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Roscoe A. Green III, Kyle Gretel, and Clayton T. Osteen of Cotney Construction Law,
LLP, Tampa, FL, counsel for Appellant.
Oleta Vassilopoulos, Monica Barron, and William Robinson, Office of General
Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for
Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this case and jointly request dismissal with prejudice.  Accordingly,
the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 5, 2022
CBCA 7445
CROWN LEASING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Jonathan Williams and Eric A. Valle, of PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Benjamin D. Lorber, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 1, 2022, appellant advised the Board that the parties had reached a settlement
and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg    
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
MOTIONS FOR FULL BOARD RECONSIDERATION DENIED:
February 19, 2020
CBCA 5698-R
STOBIL ENTERPRISE,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Billie O. Stone, Chief Executive Officer of Stobil Enterprise, San Antonio, TX,
appearing for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
Before the Full Board.
PER CURIAM.
On September 16 and October 10, 2019, appellant, Stobil Enterprise (Stobil), filed
motions for reconsideration en banc.  On February 6, 2020, the panel issued a decision
denying Stobil’s motion for reconsideration.  In its decision, the panel noted that appellant
had requested en banc review, which would be addressed separately by the Board.    
Pursuant to Board Rule 28(c) (48 CFR 6101.28(c) (2019)), the Board has considered
Stobil’s request and, based upon a majority vote of the judges of the Board, Stobil’s motions
for full Board reconsideration are DENIED.
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 14, 2007 
CBCA 101       
JIMMY MARTIN, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Thomas A. Martin of Martin Law Firm, Jasper, AR, counsel for Appellant.  
Barry D. Hersh, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,  Little 
Rock, AR, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 5, 2004, Jimmy Martin filed an appeal from an assessment by the FS of $45,596.32 
due to a claimed breach of the contract by appellant.  The parties have engaged in lengthy 
negotiations which have culminated in a settlement.  By facsimile dated March 12, 2007, the 
parties forwarded to the Board their Stipulation of Settlement Agreement and Release.  That 
Stipulation specified that upon execution of the Stipulation, the document would be 
provided to the Board for entry of judgment. 

 
________________________ 
2 CBCA 101 
Accordingly, and based upon the settlement by the parties, the appeal is DISMISSED 
WITH PREJUDICE. 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
______________________________ 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 14, 2011 
CBCA 2218 
DAVID JOHNSON, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
David Johnson, pro se, Lonoke, AR. 
M. Leah Wright, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Auburn, WA, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
By letter dated February 3, 2011, the Board was notified by counsel for General 
Services Administration (GSA) that the parties had settled the appeal and that GSA had 
processed the payment as set out in the settlement agreement, which was also provided to the 
Board. The agreement calls for the appeal to be dismissed with prejudice. 
The appeal is, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
_____________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 6, 2007 
CBCA 342 
SUCCESS RESULTS CONSULTING, INC., 
Appellant, 
v.
 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 
Respondent. 
Jason N. Workmaster of McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, DC, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Marquetta J. Bryan, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban 
Development, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 1, 2007, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal requesting that 
the Board dismiss the captioned appeal with prejudice, as the case has been settled. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 

Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 3, 2023
CBCA 7605
DAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Kristin E. Zachman and Johnathan M. Bailey of Cokinos Young, San Antonio, TX,
counsel for Appellant.
Jay Bernstein and David Charin, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On May 2, 2023, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice after
having settled all matters in the appeal.  Appellant’s motion is granted.  Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 17, 2007 
CBCA 212 
EASTERN SHOSHONE & NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBES, 
Appellants, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Colin C. Hampson of Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, San 
Diego, CA, counsel for Appellant Eastern Shoshone Tribe. 
Richard M. Berley of Ziontz, Chestnut, Varnell, Berley & Slonim, LLP, Seattle, WA, 
counsel for Appellant Northern Arapaho Tribe. 
Gerald R. Moore, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Billings, MT, 
counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On October 12, 2004, the Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals 
docketed the appeal of the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes of the  contracting 
officer’s decision to terminate for cause the Ray Lake Dam construction contract no. 
CTC58X00224.  On August 31, 2007, the parties reported that they have reached, and 
satisfied the requirements of, a settlement agreement concerning this appeal.  They therefore 
request that the Board dismiss this appeal. 

______________________________ 
2 CBCA 212 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 3, 2024
CBCA 8014
R&K CYBER SOLUTIONS LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Joseph Carter, Chief Executive Officer of R&K Cyber Solutions LLC, Stafford, VA,
appearing for Appellant.
Justin D. Haselden and Julie Cannatti, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this case and jointly request dismissal with prejudice.  Accordingly,
the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Kyle Chadwick                
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 30, 2023
CBCA 7318
INTEGHEARTY WHEELCHAIR VAN SERVICES, LLC,1
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Timothy J. Turner and Jon Perrone of Whitcomb, Selinsky, P.C., Denver, CO, counsel
for Appellant.
1 Appellant filed this appeal, and the Clerk of the Board docketed this appeal,
using the name “Integhearty Wheelchair Van Services, LLC.”  During the course of
litigation, appellant began substituting the name “Integhearty Ambulance Service, LLC” in
the case caption in its filings, and its motion to dismiss this appeal is captioned in that name. 
We note that the contract underlying this appeal was awarded to “Integhearty Ambulance
Services, LLC” (with an “s”) but that all contract modifications were issued using the name
“Integhearty Wheelchair Van Service, LLC” (without an “s” and sometimes, but not always,
with “Integhearty Ambulance Service” added as a “doing business as” name).  Despite the
name variations that the parties used in different filings and the contract, neither party ever
filed a motion requesting a change to the Board’s official caption.  The Government, except
in an April 2022 motion and a May 2022 reply brief, has used the name “Integhearty
Wheelchair Van Services, LLC” in its filings, including as recently as December 2022.  In
such circumstances, the Board is using the name in the official case caption in this dismissal
order.

CBCA 7318 2
Kathleen Ramos, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant, Integhearty Wheelchair Van Services, LLC (Integhearty), filed a motion
requesting that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice, given that the parties have
settled their dispute.  Integhearty’s motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 19, 2019
CBCA 6079
HAMILTON PACIFIC CHAMBERLAIN, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Sean Milani-nia of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 19, 2018, the Board received from Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC a
timely appeal of a deemed denial involving a contract with the Department of Veterans
Affairs.  The parties engaged in non-binding evalutative alternative dispute resolution
proceedings with Board Judge O’Rourke.  The parties resolved the dispute.  In accordance
with the request of the parties, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
     Joseph A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DENIED: April 5, 2021
CBCA 6178, 6179, 6180, 6181, 6182, 6183, 6184
BLM COMPANIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Doug P. Hibshman and Nicholas T. Solosky of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Jonathan E. English and Julie K. Cannatti, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, DRUMMOND, and O’ROURKE. 
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
These appeals were stayed while similar cases were being resolved at this Board, then
on appeal at the Federal Circuit.  The Court affirmed “the Board’s determination that the
contract terms unambiguously cover routine inspections through a monthly fee rather than
individual payments,” which resulted in the denial of those appeals.  P.K. Management
Group, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, 987 F.3d 1030, 1031 (Fed. Cir.
2021) (contract is unambiguous; plain meaning prevails).  The contractor offers no basis to
distinguish these cases, in which it makes similar contract interpretation allegations.  The
contractor has declined the opportunity to suggest a reason why these appeals should not be


CBCA 6178, 6179, 6180, 6181, 6182, 6183, 6184 2
denied, given the similarity of issues and the staying of these cases while the common issues
were resolved.
Decision
The Board DENIES these appeals.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
We concur:
  Jerome  M. Drummond       Kathleen  J. O’Rourke     
JEROME M. DRUMMOND KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 24, 2025
CBCA 8431
TRIBAL HEALTH, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Edward T. DeLisle, Andrés M. Vera, and Amaiya L. Johnson of Thompson Hine LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Anthony E. Marrone, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and
Human Services, Boston, MA; and Eno-Obong J. Essien, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 23, 2025, the parties, having finalized a settlement of the dispute
underlying this appeal, filed a stipulation of dismissal.  Consistent with that stipulation, this
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, fees, and
expenses.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: October 1, 2009 
CBCA 1230 
WEST RIDGE, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Robert L. Kenny of Law Office of Robert L. Kenny, San Diego, CA, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Mel Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS  (Chairman), BORWICK, and HYATT . 
DANIELS , Board Judge. 
West Ridge, LLC (West Ridge) claimed that it was entitled to $162,123.51 under a 
contract with the General Services Administration (GSA) for the lease of space for 
government offices in San Diego, California. A GSA contracting officer denied the claim, 
and West Ridge appealed his decision. 
On April 15, 2009, the Board denied a motion by GSA for summary relief because 
material facts regarding the dispute were in dispute.  West Ridge, LLC v. General Services 
Administration, CBCA 1230, 09-1 BCA ¶ 34,114.  The parties subsequently settled their 
differences, and on October 1, 2009, they jointly moved the Board for a stipulated award to 

 
  
2 CBCA 1230 
West Ridge of $111,000, pursuant to Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2008)).  Each party 
has stated that it will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a Board decision which 
awards the stipulated amount. 
Decision 
The motion is granted.  The appeal is GRANTED IN PART .  The General Services 
Administration shall pay to West Ridge, LLC the sum of $111,000.  This sum shall be paid 
from the permanent indefinite judgment fund.  31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006). 
_________________________ 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
_________________________ _________________________ 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 11, 2025
CBCA 8156
GEOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Nancy M. Camardo of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Anastasia Snyderman and Tami Hagberg, Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 10, 2025, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a
settlement and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 21, 2015
CBCA 4842, 4843, 4844
AMERICA’S PRIDE
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Philip J. Saulnier, President and CEO of America’s Pride, Fort Belvoir, VA, appearing
for Appellant.
Dennis J. Kulish, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Johnstown, PA, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 18, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the above-captioned appeals,
advising the Board that the parties have settled and requesting that these appeals be
dismissed.  Respondent does not oppose.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
____________________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
RECONSIDERATION DENIED: November 16, 2020
CBCA 6841-R
MIDLAND LANGUAGE CENTER,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Tatjana Markovic, President of Midland Language Center, St. Louis, MO, appearing
for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell and Laetitia Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
Midland Language Center (MLC) seeks reconsideration under Board Rule 26 (48
CFR 6101.26 (2020)) of our decision dismissing CBCA 6841 on prudential grounds.  We
found that we had jurisdiction of MLC’s appeal from the denial of a nonmonetary claim for
an interpretation of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contract, but that there was no
live dispute between the parties after the contract expired.  MLC argues in relevant part:
Asking the Appellant/Contractor not to follow the Contract is illegal.


CBCA 6841-R 2
The issue occurred during the time the Contract was active in Jan[uary] 2020
and it may have broader repercussions as we look into the reasons the VA
Medical Center decided to deny over the phone services to their teams as the
Contract required.  Their teams are entitled to the services guaranteed under
the Contract and it is not appropriate . . . to deny such services to them.
The Contract has not been renewed due to VA Medical Center[’s] wanting to
cover up their practices and not because of the Contractor’s noncompliance
with the Contract.  The need for Interpreting exists and we have received a
request for Interpreting as recently as Nov[ember] 2020.
These arguments go beyond the interpretive issue that MLC raised in its appeal and
involve factual allegations that MLC did not present in its claim or in its notice of appeal. 
See Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. United States, 818 F.2d 856, 858 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (“On
appeal to the Board . . . a contractor . . . may not raise any new claims not presented . . . to
the contracting officer.”).  Furthermore, to the extent that we may consider MLC’s new
arguments, MLC does not persuade us that “a declaration” by the Board of our interpretation
of the contract would effectively “resolve [an ongoing] dispute.”  Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
v. United States, 178 F.3d 1260, 1271 (Fed. Cir. 1999).  
For these reasons, we DENY reconsideration of our dismissal of the appeal.
     Kyle Chadwick             
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
  Erica S. Beardsley             Jonathan D. Zischkau   
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 9, 2010 
CBCA 1767, 1968, 2098, 2099 
BROOKS RANGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Theodore M. Bailey of Bailey & Bailey, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for 
Appellant. 
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
GOODMAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. filed notices of appeal in connection with a 
dispute under contract numbers GS-05P07-SI-D-0022 and GS06F0013R, for operations and 
maintenance services. The parties participated in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) with 
the panel chair presiding as the ADR neutral.  On November 4, 2010, appellant advised the 
Board that the settlement amount has been paid and the appeals should be dismissed with 
prejudice. 

    
      
___________________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 1767, 1968, 2098, 2099 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED: February 16, 2017
CBCA 5637
ECODIT LLC,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
John J. O’Brien, Victor G. Klingelhofer, and Daniel Strouse of Cohen Mohr, LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
John Alumbaugh, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 16, 2017, counsel for appellant, ECODIT LLC (ECODIT), informed the
Board that the Agency for International Development (USAID) had, on February 14, 2017,
notified it that USAID had decided to rescind its purported “final decision,” issued on
November 18, 2016.  ECODIT indicated that in lieu of that notification it was withdrawing
its notice of appeal, but reserves all rights, including its right to file a notice of appeal,
should USAID issue a valid contracting officer’s final decision in the future.  Accordingly,
this appeal is DISMISSED.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: June 18, 2019
CBCA 6515
TOTAL TEAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Herman M. Braude of Braude Law Group, P.C., Rockville, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR; and Donald Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties jointly request dismissal without prejudice, having “agreed that the Board
does not possess subject matter jurisdiction.”  We grant the motion under Board Rule
12(b)(2) and (d) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2), (d) (2018)) without deciding the jurisdictional
issue.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
  Kyle Chadwick             
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 6, 2010 
CBCA 753 
MINEHOLE CLOSURE CONSULTANTS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Michael H. Ferring of Ferring & DeLue LLP, Seattle, WA, counsel for Appellant. 
Tara Campbell Lewis, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Pittsburgh, 
PA, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 16, 2009, the appellant informed the Board that the above-captioned 
case has been resolved.  
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 __________________________ 
CANDIDA S. STEEL
               Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 21, 2025
CBCA 8284
CAPE MORAINE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Robert Clark, Managing Principal, and John F. Clark, Authorized Representative of
Cape Moraine, LLC, Falmouth, MA, appearing for Appellant.
Brett A. Pisciotta, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 20, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, stating that the underlying dispute has been resolved through settlement.  The
motion is granted, and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Marian E. Sullivan        
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: March 7, 2011 
CBCA 2307 
1125 - 15th STREET, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Brett D. Orlove of Grossberg, Yochelson, Fox & Beyda, LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas Y. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
1125 - 15th Street, LLC, appellant, claimed that it was entitled to an additional rental 
payment, pursuant to the tax adjustment clause, under a lease with the General Services 
Administration, respondent, for space in a building owned by appellant. Appellant appealed 
from the contracting officer’s deemed denial of its claim. 
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the case, stating that respondent has paid the 
claim in full. 

 
        
_________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2307
 
The motion is granted. The case is DISMISSED .
 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 23, 2015
CBCA 3421
DIENER BUILDING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Charles M. Asmar and David A. Edelstein of Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Peter S. Kraemer, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
STERN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have notified the Board that all issues in this appeal have been settled and
request that the above-captioned appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
 JAMES L. STERN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 28, 2008 
CBCA 172, 233, 234 
ROCK POINT COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Lisa F. Ryan of  Hobbs, Straus, Dean  & Walker, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Keith W. Weaver, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior,  Albuquerque, 
NM, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On January 24, 2006, appellant, Rock Point Community School Board, Inc., 
timely  appealed the de cision of a Bureau of Indian Affairs contracting officer denying 
appellant  funding for the transportation enrolled students who  resided outside  the established 
boundaries  of the Rock Point Community School District.  On January 16, 2008, the parties 
entered into a settlement agreement.  Payment of the settlemen t a mount was received by 
appellant  on February 11, 2008.  Thereafter, appellant filed an unopposed motion  to dismiss 
the above-captioned appeals. 

_____________________________ 
2 CBCA 172, 233, 234 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge