Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION:  January 22, 2024
CBCA 7976
ALEXANDER TYLER CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Mark E. Block of Block, Janney & Sisley, LLC, Norwich, CT, counsel for Appellant.
Brett A. Pisciotta, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges KULLBERG, CHADWICK, and KANG.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
The parties move jointly to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.  We grant the
motion.  See Board Rule 12(b)(3) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(3) (2022)).
Appellant, Alexander Tyler Corp., leases space to respondent, General Services
Administration (GSA).  On December 14, 2023, appellant submitted an agency-level protest
of the non-selection of appellant’s response to a request for lease proposal, as well as a
certified claim for (1) “a new lease” of space that appellant currently leases to GSA “or . . .
compensation . . . equal to the lost rent . . . until . . . [appellant] enters into a lease with a
replacement tenant,” and (2) “holdover rent from January 1, 2023 . . . equal to 200% of the
monthly rent as of January 16, 2023, until the space is vacated.”


CBCA 7976 2
The GSA contracting officer dismissed the protest the next day and added that “GSA
will issue a response to [the certified claim] in accordance with [48 CFR] 33.211 and within
the required timelines.”  On December 27, 2023, in response to further correspondence from
appellant, the contracting officer reiterated that the protest had been dismissed and that GSA
intended to respond to the claim.
On January 3, 2024, appellant filed this appeal, citing the correspondence from the
contracting officer of December 15 and 27.
The parties correctly state that the Board lacks jurisdiction because the decision
appealed from resolved “a bid protest, not a claim under the Contract Disputes Act,
41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109 [(2018)], and therefore [the matter] has been filed in the wrong
forum.”  See, e.g., Innovative (PBX) Telephone Services, Inc. v. Department of Veterans
Affairs, CBCA 12, et al., 07-2 BCA ¶ 33,685, at 166,765 (“We do not have jurisdiction over
bid protests because bid protests, by definition, involve disputes between the Government
and disappointed bidders,” not contractors.).
The certified claim cannot support jurisdiction because it has not been the subject of
a contracting officer’s decision or a deemed denial.  See 41 U.S.C. § 7103(d), (f)(2), (f)(5).
Decision
The appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
    H. Chuck Kullberg             Jonathan L. Kang        
H. CHUCK KULLBERG JONATHAN L. KANG
Board Judge Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: May 22, 2017 
CBCA 5660 
BLACKHAWK, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Robert J. Symon of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, DC, counsel
for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges RUSSELL, O’ROURKE, and CHADWICK.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
On March 1, 2017, appellant, Blackhawk, LLC, appealed the final decision of the
Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) contracting officer, dated January 17, 2017, pertaining
to lease number VA260-15-L-0042.  The Board has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to
41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012).
On May 11, 2017, the parties entered into a settlement agreement in accordance with
Board Rule 54 (48 CFR 6101.54(2016)), resolving all claims under this appeal.  On May 15,
2017, pursuant to a settlement, the parties filed a joint motion for judgment in favor of
appellant in the amount of $500,000 without statutory interest, if payment is made in thirty
days. 


CBCA 5660 2
The joint motion and stipulation state that the parties will each bear their own attorney
fees, costs, and expenses, and that, in accordance with Board Rule 25(b), neither party will
seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision under Board Rules 26 or 27. 
The parties further affirm that neither Blackhawk nor the VA will appeal the Board’s
decision.
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  Appellant is awarded $500,000, plus interest
calculated in accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 7109 and the parties’ joint stipulation, beginning
on June 22, 2017, if payment is not made by that date. 
     
___________________________
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
We concur:
___________________________ ___________________________
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL KYLE E. CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  August 8, 2018
CBCA 5768 
PRIMESTAR CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Lori C. Gray of the Law Offices of Lori Chambers-Gray, Houston, TX and Lawrence
J. Sklute of Sklute & Associates, Potomac, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Helen Y. Kearns, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Fort
Worth, TX, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 31, 2018, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal without prejudice
pursuant to CBCA Rule 12(d).  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.  
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
_
MOTION FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION DENIED: July 2, 2021
CBCA 6682, 6765, 6767
PRIME TECH CONSTRUCTION LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Chizoma B. Onyems, President of Prime Tech Construction LLC, Auburn, CA,
appearing for Appellant.
Thomas M. Cordova, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy,
Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
Before the Full Board.
PER CURIAM.*
On April 8, 2021, appellant, Prime Tech Construction LLC (Prime Tech), filed a
motion pursuant to Board Rule 28(a) (48 CFR 6101.28(a) (2020)) asking the full Board to
consider the decision that the panel issued in these consolidated appeals on March 31, 2021.
Based upon a majority vote of the Board’s judges, Prime Tech’s motion for full Board
consideration is DENIED.
* Judge Harold D. Lester, Jr. previously served as a Board Neutral in this matter
and did not participate in this decision.
______________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREDJUDICE:  September 21, 2012 
CBCA 2688 
GERALD BROWN, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
Gerald Brown, pro se, Boys Town, NE. 
Fallyme E. Guerrero, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Kansas City, MO, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On September 18, 2012, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this matter, 
advising the Board that they had successfully settled the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED:  September 21, 2009 
CBCA 1612 
DON CASWELL, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Don Caswell, Smyrna, GA, appearing for Appellant. 
Gabriel N. Steinberg, Office of the Regional Counsel, General Services 
Administration, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN,  Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On June 16, 2009, appellant, Don Caswell, filed a notice of appeal in connection with 
a dispute under contract GS04F09FBE5614, for the purchase of a 2003 Ford F150 truck from 
the General Services Administration (GSA) Fleet Public Sale held in Atlanta, Georgia. 
Appellant maintained he was entitled to reimbursement of $450 for repairs.  
The parties were ordered to advise the undersigned how they wished to proceed with 
resolving the appeal, and via a letter dated September 15, 2009, Mr. Caswell informed the 
Board that “I am dropping my case against GSA.”  

                                                             
2 CBCA 1612 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 1, 2010 
CBCA 1557 
XEROX CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
Respondent. 
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Herman J. Narcho and Dennis Adelson, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 13, 2009, Xerox Corporation filed a notice of appeal in connection with a 
dispute under contract number GS-25F-0062L, to sell, lease, and maintain various 
duplicating machines and to provide supplies and services.  On March 29, 2010, appellant 
filed a notice of dismissal with prejudice stating the parties have executed a settlement 
agreement.  Respondent has no objection to the dismissal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 3, 2016
CBCA 5238
PACIFICSPAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Chase E. Halsey of Murphy Karber Cordier PLC, Phoenix, AZ, counsel for Appellant.
Mark Ezersky, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have notified the Board that they have settled matters in the above-
referenced appeal and request that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
_____________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 20, 2010 
CBCA 1740 
SINGLETON ENTERPRISES, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Wayne Singleton, Owner of Singleton Enterprises, Luthersville, GA, appearing for 
Appellant. 
Daniel L. Winand, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard, 
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
By letter dated January 8, 2010, appellant advised the Board that the parties’ 
previously agreed to settlement has been effectuated and a modification has issued in 
settlement of the matters in dispute.  The modification calls for appellant to seek dismissal 
with prejudice.  Accordingly, and in conformance with the agreement of the parties, the 
Board DISMISSES  appellant’s appeal WITH  PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 7, 2019
CBCA 6347
POINT BLANK ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Brad Fagg of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
William Robinson, Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department
of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On February 1, 2019, the appellant filed an unopposed motion to the Board to dismiss
the above-referenced matter.  The request is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Jeri Kaylene Somers      
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 6, 2007 
CBCA 411, 412 
KEY FEDERAL FINANCE, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent in CBCA 411, 
and 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 
Respondent in CBCA 412. 
Joseph J. Petrillo of Petrillo & Powell, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 411. 
Fred Kopatich, Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 412. 
STERN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant has advised the Board that the parties have settled all matters raised in these 
appeals, and accordingly, moves the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice. 
Respondents do not oppose the motion. 

                                                                                                                  
 
________________________________ 
2 CBCA 411, 412  
In accordance with the agreement of the parties, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 25, 2017
CBCA 5161
VVP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Craig T. Redinger, Manager of VVP, LLC, Charlottesville, VA, appearing for
Appellant.
Bradley S. Boettcher, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 25, 2017, the parties filed a joint request to dismiss the captioned appeal
based on a settlement.  The Board commends the parties on reaching a settlement of their
dispute.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
_______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 11, 2009 
CBCA 1545 
GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES, LLC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent.
 Edwin C. Moritz, President of Gustavson Associates, LLC, Boulder, CO, appearing 
for Appellant.  
Joseph D. Darnell, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Anchorage, 
AK, counsel for Respondent. 
GILMORE, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 31, 2009, respondent  filed, with appellant’s concurrence, a motion to dismiss 
this appeal with prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(c).  The parties advised that they have 
reached a settlement.      
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
BERYL S. GILMORE 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 4, 2013 
CBCA 2212
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have settled this matter.  With respondent’s concurrence, appellant has
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.   Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED: August 25, 2010 
CBCA 2049 
URBAN SERVICE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Joanne Doddy Fort, General Counsel of Urban Service Systems Corporation, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 12, 2010, the Board received a filing indicating that appellant was 
withdrawing its appeal.  Pursuant to Board Rule 12, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: February 25, 2010 
CBCA 1242 
GENERAL HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Michael F. Copley, Mark E. Landers, and Kenley S. Maddux of The Copley Law 
Firm, LLC, Galloway, OH, counsel for Appellant. 
Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges STERN , BORWICK, and VERGILIO . 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
These appeals involve claims for an equitable adjustment arising out of a contract for 
renovation of the fourth floor of the Joseph P. Kinneary Federal Courthouse, Columbus, 
Ohio.  
Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b)(2009)), the parties have submitted 
a joint settlement stipulation stipulating to the award of $275,000, inclusive of interest and 
attorney fees.  The parties state that the parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief 
from, the Board’s decision and they will not appeal the decision. 

    
     
_______________________________ 
_______________________________ ________________________________ 
2 CBCA 1242 
The Board adopts the parties’ stipulation by decision. Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), 
the Board’s decision is an adjudication on the merits.  
Decision 
These appeals are GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $275,000. Payment is to 
be made in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006). 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
JAMES L. STERN JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED: December 8, 2014
CBCA 2883
DENVER WEST OFFICE LEASING COMPANY, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Robert C. MacKichan, and Jacob W. Scott of Vedder Price, pp.c.Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Shana T. Vinson, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
STEEL, Board Judge.
ORDER  
Appellant Denver West Office Leasing Company, LLC,  through counsel notified the
Board on November 25, 2014, that it wishes to withdraw its appeal.  The General Services
Administration has no objection to the withdrawal.  Therefore, the Board DISMISSES the
above-captioned case.  
                                                
CANDIDA S. STEEL
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART: November 6, 2020
CBCA 6503
OAK HILLS PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Seamus Curley of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
James Scott and Jessica Gunzel, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK. 
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
Respondent, the General Services Administration, offset the amount of $12,424.71
from its lease payment to appellant, Oak Hills Property Associates, LLC, to recoup real
estate taxes GSA alleged it had wrongly paid.  Appellant has moved for summary judgment
in the amount of the offset claiming that the government’s right to offset is barred by the
Contract Dispute Act’s (CDA) six-year statute of limitations, 41 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(4)(A)
(2018).  Appellant also moved for an award of interest in the amount of $749.97 from the
date of the offset until November 15, 2018, the date appellant submitted its CDA claim.  


CBCA 6503 2
GSA does not oppose this motion, except to challenge appellant’s claim for $749.97
in other than CDA interest.1  GSA states that it cannot produce any documentary evidence
that a contracting officer asserted a claim to withhold the funds and resolve the issues of tax
liability and of damages within the CDA limitations period.  Based on the Board’s decision
in 1000-1100 Wilson Owner, LLC v. General Services Administration, CBCA 6506, 20-1
BCA ¶ 37,642, which involved almost identical facts to this case, GSA’s claim for
$12,424.71 is, therefore, barred by the CDA statute of limitations.  
On October 2, 2020, appellant filed a notice withdrawing its claim in this appeal for
$3891.79 in rent GSA failed to pay appellant in order to recoup taxes for which GSA alleged
it had wrongly reimbursed appellant (the short pay claim).  GSA did not oppose appellant’s
decision to withdraw the short pay claim.   
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART appellant’s motion for summary judgment and enters
judgment for appellant in the amount of $12,424.71, plus CDA interest to run from
November 15, 2018.  The short pay claim is DISMISSED, and only appellant’s claim for
other than CDA interest remains to be decided in this appeal.
 
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
We concur:
  Jonathan D. Zischkau         Kyle Chadwick               
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
1  The parties are currently briefing for the Board the issue of appellant’s
entitlement to other than CDA interest.
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 8, 2016
CBCA 4449, 4828
FACCHINA SPECIALTY SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Michael A. Branca and Michael C. Zisa of Pecker & Abramson, P.C., Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Alexander W. Fichtel and Ratna C. Gupta, Office of the Regional Solicitor,
Department of the Interior, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 7, 2016, the parties submitted a joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned
appeals.  Accordingly, CBCA 4449 and CBCA 4828 are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
___________________________
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE: August 23, 2007 
CBCA 73 
MANUEL ROSADO, 1
                                                   Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
                                                        Respondent. 
Manuel Rosado, pro se, Miami, FL.     
William M. Stevens, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security, Washington, DC, appearing for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman) , STERN  and SOMERS .
 
SOMERS , Board Judge.
 
ORDER 
This appeal arose out of a contract for the sale of a vehicle pursuant to a government 
public auction held in Port Everglades, Florida, on December 15, 2005.  EG&G Technical 
Services (EG&G) conducted the auction on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security, 
1   Previously, this case had been incorrectly docketed by the Department of 
Transportation Board of Contract Appeals (DOTBCA) with EG&G Technical Services 
identified as appellant.  The case was transferred to this Board effective January 6, 2007, 
upon consolidation of the various civilian boards of contract appeals.  See Pub. L. No. 109­
163, § 847, 119 Stat. 3136 (2006).      

  
    
 
   
     
   
__________________________ 
   
2 CBCA 73 
Customs and Border Protection.  The terms of the contract required appellant, Manuel 
Rosado, to pick up the purchased property by December 22, 2005.  In January 2006, Mr. 
Rosado attempted to retrieve the property from EG&G.  EG&G refused to release the 
property. In a letter dated January 27, 2006, EG&G informed Mr. Rosado that he had been 
placed in default for his failure to pick up the property by the date required.  By decision 
dated May 19, 2006, the contracting officer denied Mr. Rosado’s request for 
reconsideration.  Mr. Rosado filed this appeal on May 24, 2006. 
By letter dated July 12, 2006, the contracting officer advised the DOTBCA that the 
parties had reached a settlement. By order dated August 15, 2006, the DOTBCA ordered 
appellant to file a written notice withdrawing the appeal, or, alternatively, requested that the 
parties file a written stipulation of dismissal.  Since that time, the DOTBCA and this Board 
have attempted to contact appellant several times, without success.  Therefore, based upon 
appellant’s failure to prosecute his appeal, the appeal is dismissed.  
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE . 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
_____________________________ _________________________________ 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 4, 2024
CBCA 7910
DISABLED VETERANS CONSTRUCTION INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Shane J. McCall, Nicole D. Pottroff, John L. Holtz, Gregory P. Weber, and
Stephanie L. Ellis of Koprince McCall Pottroff LLC, Lawrence, KS, counsel for Appellant.
Tobin E. Dale, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle,
WA; and Brian D. Payton, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 1, 2024, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement
and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 13, 2026
CBCA 7539
HAWAIIAN DREDGING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Erik D. Eike, Mililani, HI; and Michael A. Branca and Michael C. Zisa of Peckar &
Abramson, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Jack F. Gilbert, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
KANG, Board Judge.
On April 10, 2026, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
based on their settlement agreement.  Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2024)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Jonathan L. Kang         
JONATHAN L. KANG
Board Judge
_______________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 18, 2008 
CBCA 939 
DUAL CAL BUILDERS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
Respondent. 
D. Michael Schoenfeld and Lisa D. Nicolls of Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld 
LLP, Sacramento, CA, counsel for Appellant. 
Dennis Adelson and Charles Bucknor, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 17, 2008, Dual Cal Builders, Inc. moved to dismiss this appeal with 
prejudice.  The motion states that the matter before the Board has been settled.  
Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED 
WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
_________________________________ 
DISMISSED:  May 17, 2007 
CBCA 737 
MVM, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 
Respondent. 
Tenley A. Carp of Cohen Mohr, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Edward J. Weber, Office of General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Respondent. 
HYATT , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal was filed on May 2, 2007.  On May 11, 2007, the parties advised the 
Board that this matter had been resolved, and appellant has asked to withdraw its appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge 

2 CBCA 673
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: October 27, 2020
CBCA 6771
WILLIAMSON & MOORE INCORPORATED,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Angela Williamson, President of Williamson & Moore Incorporated, Greensboro, NC,
appearing for Appellant.
Scott Dalton and Michael Kiffney, Office of Chief Counsel, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 23, 2020, appellant requested to dismiss this appeal without prejudice. 
Respondent consented to appellant’s request.  Pursuant to CBCA Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR
6101.12(b)(2) (2019)), this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
 
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 25, 2013
CBCA 3345
MATHER ENTERPRISES,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Diana Parks Curran of Curran Legal Services Group, Inc., Duluth, GA, counsel for
Appellant.
Jeanne S. Morris, Office of Regional Counsel,  Department of Veterans Affairs,
Bedford, MA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 10, 2013, Mather Enterprises (lessor) timely appealed a contracting officer
decision concerning its contract, GS-V101-183R-760-005-01, with the Department of
Veterans Affairs (agency).  The agency occupied premises (warehouse, office, processing
space, and parking) for a consolidated mail-out pharmacy.  The contracting officer had
denied the lessor’s claim seeking $520,897.80, as well as interest for various damages said
to arise from the agency’s multiple breaches of the contract.  The parties utilized Board Judge
Borwick as a neutral and resolved the dispute.  Under a stipulation of settlement, the agency
has paid the lessor $100,000 and the parties have modified the contract.  In accordance with
a joint motion dated November 22, 2013, the Board hereby DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE this appeal.
___________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  January 27, 2026
CBCA 8233
FHC CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Frank H. Fehmel, Managing Director of FHC Contracting, Inc., Dallas, TX, appearing
for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bend,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, O’ROURKE, and CHADWICK.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
On January 23, 2026, appellant, FHC Contracting, Inc. (FHC), and respondent, the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated
judgment in FHC’s favor in the amount of $300,000, with payment to be made through the
permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2018).  FHC waives any right it may
have to claim for recovery of interest, attorney fees, costs, and expenses it may have incurred
in conjunction with the appeal, except that if the settlement amount remains unpaid, Contract
Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2018), interest will begin to accrue on March 27,
2026, and will continue to accrue until payment is made.  The parties have stipulated that


CBCA 8233 2
they will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board’s entry of
judgment awarding the stipulated amount to FHC.  See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b)
(2024)).
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  VA shall pay $300,000 to FHC in full
settlement of CBCA 8233, with CDA interest running from March 27, 2026, if payment is
not yet made, until the payment date.  FHC waives any further right it may have to claim for
recovery of interest, attorney fees, costs, and expenses it may have incurred in conjunction
with this appeal.
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
We concur:
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke         Kyle Chadwick                
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 6, 2014
CBCA 3035
ATRIAX GROUP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
David A. Rose of Rose Consulting Law Firm, Duluth, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Kevin L. Pearson, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Roanoke, VA, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised the Board that they have entered into a settlement agreement
in this case which resolved all issues, and that appellant has received full payment.  The
parties have asked that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 15, 2026
CBCA 8798
PROSPERITY METRO PLAZA OF VIRGINIA, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Gordon N. Griffin and Richard Ariel of Holland & Knight LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Richard O. Hughes, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 12, 2026, the parties submitted a joint motion for dismissal of this appeal
with prejudice in light of their resolution of the dispute.  The Board commends the parties
on the successful resolution of this matter.  The motion is granted, and the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
MOTIONS FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION DENIED:  
February 18, 2020
CBCA 5907, 5907-R
WALKER DEVELOPMENT & TRADING GROUP INC., 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Terrance Walker of Walker Development & Trading Group Inc., Reno, NV, appearing
for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before the Full Board.
PER CURIAM.
On July 10, 2019, appellant, Walker Development & Trading Group Inc. (Walker),
filed a motion pursuant to CBCA Rule 28(a) (48 CFR 6101.28(a)(2018)) asking the full
Board to consider the decision that the panel issued on July 3, 2019, and to issue a new
decision that is consistent with precedent.  On November 14, 2019, Walker again filed a
motion pursuant to CBCA Rule 28(a) asking the full Board to consider the panel’s July 3
decision and also the panel’s reconsidered decision issued on November 13, 2019.
Based upon a majority vote of the Board’s judges, Walker’s motions for full Board
consideration are DENIED.
GRANTED IN PART:  July 10, 2008
 
CBCA 95
 
MOUNTAIN VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY, INC.,
 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Richard W. Goeken of Saltman & Stevens, P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Kenneth S. Capps, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO , and  POLLACK. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
This appeal arises out of timber sale contract no. 007744, between Mountain Valley 
Lumber Company, Inc. (Mountain Valley) and the United States Department of Agriculture, 
Forest Service (FS).  Mountain Valley filed this appeal in the amount of $1,663,934.06 on 
May 14, 2003, and it was docketed as AGBCA 2003-171-1 at the Department of Agriculture 
Board of Contract Appeals.  The appeal was transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract 
Appeals and docketed as CBCA 95.   

 
    
 
     
   
     
 
   
 
    
   
    
   
________________________________ 
_____________________________ _____________________________ 
2 
Over the life of the appeal, the parties have filed numerous procedural motions, as 
well as motions for summary relief. After extensive and disputed discovery, the parties 
advised the Board in 2007 that they were proceeding with preliminary discussions as to 
possible settlement.  This was assisted in part by a decision by the Court of Federal Claims 
on another matter, which apparently clarified some potential damage issues.  Extensions in 
discovery were granted by the Board to allow for settlement discussions. 
On July 1, 2008, the Board received a stipulation and request for decision granting 
the appeal.  The joint stipulation was dated June 26, 2008.  Under it, the parties agreed that 
they had settled any and all claims by either party arising out of or relating to the underlying 
contract and the instant appeal.  Further, the parties agreed to abide by a Board decision 
requiring the FS to pay appellant $410,000, plus interest on this amount calculated from 
November 8, 2002, until paid in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Disputes 
Act.  Each party has agreed to bear its own costs and attorney fees.  The parties additionally 
stipulated that the decision of the Board will be final and binding upon the parties and not 
subject to further appeal.  
Decision 
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the parties’ 
joint stipulation, the Board awards the sum of $410,000, plus interest on said amount under 
the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 611(2000), beginning November 8, 2002.  Payment 
is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304. 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge Board Judge 

3
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 31, 2018
CBCA 2037, 2736, 2737, 2738, 2739, 2740, 2741, 2742, 2743, 2744, 2745, 2746
DESIGN ONE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., AMERICA ONE COMPANIES, INC.,
and KENNETH R. DAVIN,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Christopher W. Martin of Ayres & Parkey Attorneys, PLLC, Knoxville, TN; and Bill
Dorris of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Eyvonne Alston, Stephen Kelleher and Mohammad Ezzati, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised the Board that the above-captioned appeals have been settled
and have requested that these appeals be dismissed.  Accordingly, these appeals are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
 Kathleen J. O’Rourke   
 KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
____________________________ 
 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 29, 2009 
CBCA 1099 
AQUA TRUCK INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
John Henry Cook, Owner/President of Aqua Truck Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, 
appearing for Appellant. 
Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant, Aqua Truck Inc., filed this appeal from the denial by the Department of 
Agriculture of appellant’s claim for $85,000, arising out of the total loss of appellant’s truck. 
Subsequent to pretrial proceedings the parties entered into negotiations and executed a 
settlement agreement resolving all issues before the Board.  
In accordance with that agreement, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: October 8, 2015
CBCA 4028
KEVCON, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
William L. Bruckner and Thomas M. Regan of Bruckner Law Firm, APC, San Diego,
CA, counsel for Appellant.
Ricarto Brazela, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges POLLACK, WALTERS, and SULLIVAN.
WALTERS, Board Judge.  
On October 8, 2015, the parties submitted a settlement agreement under which they
settled fully the above appeal.  As part of their settlement agreement, they stipulated to an
award by this Board in favor of the appellant, Kevcon, Inc., in the amount of $275,000, with
the understanding that payment of that amount would be made by respondent, the Department
of Veterans Affairs, from the permanent indefinite judgment fund via wire transfer into the
Bruckner Law Firm, APC Client Trust Account.  Respondent, under the settlement
agreement, has agreed further that, within fifteen days of its receipt of this decision, it will
submit to the Department of the Treasury the documents necessary to ensure payment of the
stipulated amount from the judgment fund via wire transfer in the manner contemplated by
the settlement agreement.  


CBCA 4028 2
Under their joint stipulation, the parties state that they will not seek review,
reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision, and will not appeal the decision.  In
addition, under the settlement agreement, appellant has waived any right it may have to
interest or to seek recovery of attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice
Act.
Decision
The appeals are GRANTED IN PART.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
stipulation, the Board awards appellant, Kevcon, Inc., the stipulated settlement amount of
$275,000.  Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2014)).  Payment of that amount is to be made
for Kevcon, Inc. via wire transfer to the Bruckner Law Firm APC Client Trust Account as
described above from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
We concur:
____________________________ __________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 24, 2014
CBCA 3252
POLU KAI SERVICES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
John M. Manfredonia of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC, Cresskill, NJ, counsel for
Appellant.
Rebecca L. Tranthem, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
St. Petersburg, FL, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have informed the Board that they have reached a complete settlement of
this appeal and have requested that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, the
appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
                                                     
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 6, 2022
CBCA 6817, 6946, 6988
AAA GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Micah D. Miller, Austin, TX, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 29, 2022, the Board received the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the above-
captioned consolidated appeals pursuant to CBCA Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2020)).  The motion is granted, and the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DENIED: May 13, 2021
CBCA 6175, 6176
INNOTION ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Doug P. Hibshman and Nicholas T. Solosky of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Jonathan English and Julie Cannatti, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), BEARDSLEY, and SHERIDAN.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Innotion Enterprises, Inc. (Innotion) seeks damages arising out of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) decisions denying Innotion’s claims for payment
for certain custodial property inspections performed by appellant under HUD Field Service
Management 3.10 contracts.  The Board stayed these appeals pending resolution of Purdy
Enterprise, LLC v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, CBCA 6128, et al.
(Mar. 15, 2021), and the appeal of P.K. Management Group, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing &
Urban Development, CBCA 6185, 19-1 BCA ¶ 37,417, aff’d, P.K. Management Group, Inc.
v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development, 987 F.3d. 1030 (Fed. Cir. 2021), to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.


CBCA 6175, 6176 2
Once we decided the issue in HUD’s favor in Purdy, we issued a show cause order
directing appellant to explain why these appeals should not also be denied.  Appellant has
failed to do so.  Accordingly, these appeals are denied.
Decision
We DENY these appeals.
     Patricia J. Sheridan     
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Jeri Kaylene Somers          Erica S. Beardsley          
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: March 22, 2011 
CBCA 2312 
MARINETTE MARINE CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Marc E. Jamo, Contracts Manager of Marinette Marine Corporation, Marinette, WI, 
appearing for Appellant. 
Isaac Johnson, Jr., Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard, 
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges HYATT , DRUMMOND , and KULLBERG . 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
This appeal was from a contracting officer’s final decision regarding claims submitted 
by appellant, Marinette Marine Corporation (MMC), to respondent, the Department of 
Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard), totaling $1,041,496. The 
claims relate to the Coast Guard’s partial termination for convenience and stop work order 
issued under contract HSCG23-06-D-ARB001 regarding Government initiated engineering 
change proposal (ECP), ECP-009, entitled “Interactive Electronic Technical Publication 
(IETP) and Maintenance Philosophy.” 

 
            
                 
            
              
              
           
   
            
             
                
             
  
                                              
  
 
 
                                                                                         
    
  
2 CBCA 2312 
Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2010)), the parties have submitted 
a joint settlement stipulation to an award by this Board in favor of MMC in the amount of 
$1,024,551, plus interest as allowable under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. 
§§ 7101-7109 (as codified by Pub. L. No. 111-350, 124 Stat. 3677, 3816-3826 (2011)), to 
be computed from January 28, 2011. Finally, the parties have stipulated that neither party 
will seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and that neither party will 
appeal the Board’s decision. 
Decision 
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the parties’ 
joint stipulation, the Board awards appellant the sum of $1,024,551, plus interest on said 
amount under the CDA, 41 U.S.C. § 7109, beginning January 28, 2011. Payment is to be 
made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006); 41 U.S.C. 
§ 7108. 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
CATHERINE B. HYATT H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE:  April 23, 2008 
CBCA 802 
GULF SHORES, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Michael J. Caywood of Dresser, Dresser, Haas & Caywood, P.C., Sturgis, MI, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Jean Hardin, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal involves a dispute between Gulf Shores, LLC  (Gulf Shores or appellant) 
and the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 
or respondent).  The dispute arose from a contract for mobile home pads in Florida. 
Appellant moves to dismiss, with prejudice, that portion of its claim seeking reimbursement 
for attorney fees and costs incurred by another entity, Riverwood Development, in a dispute 
with appellant in Florida.  See Gulf Shores v. Riverwood Development , 927 So. 246 (Fla. 
Dist. Ct. App. 2006).   Appellant seeks to have its certified claim amount of $191,029.50 
reduced by $44,460, with the balance of its claim for additional expenses arising under a 
“Mobile Home Unit Pad Lease” remaining.  Appellant notes in its motion that: 
[a]t the time of the original claim of Gulf Shores against FEMA, 
the attorneys’ fees issue with Riverwood was still in dispute.  

  
 
  
 
     
     
 
_______________________ 
2 CBCA 802 
Although this case was resolved just prior to the certified claim of Gulf 
Shores that is the subject matter of this claim, it was the understanding 
of Gulf Shores that despite the Court of Appeals decision, it still paid 
attorneys’ fees to Riverwood to avoid any further appeals.  Upon 
investigation of this issue following the Government’s Motion to 
Dismiss, it was discovered  that Gulf Shores did not pay Riverwood for 
any of its attorneys’ fees. Consequently, Gulf Shores moves to dismiss 
a portion of its damages claim by the amount of $44,460, which is the 
Riverwood attorneys’ fees component of the damages calculation. 
Appellant’s unopposed motion is granted.  It is hereby ordered that the portion of 
appellant’s claim seeking attorney fees and costs relating to its dispute with Riverside 
Development in Florida shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and appellant’s 
certified claim amount of $191,029.50 shall be reduced by $44,460. 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 27, 2017  
CBCA 5612
DELTA TIMBER COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Eric B. Sorenson, President of Delta Timber Company, Montrose, CO, appearing for
Appellant.
Daniel B. Rosenbluth, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the above-referenced
appeal.  The parties settled the case and requested that the Board dismiss it with prejudice. 
In accordance with the parties’ request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
___________________________
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 31, 2020
CBCA 6522
THOMAS M. JACQUES ELECTRIC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Jared W. Allen of Beard St. Clair Gaffney PA, Idaho Falls, ID, counsel for Appellant.
Kelly Y. Burnell, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 29, 2020, the parties advised the Board that the above-captioned appeal
was settled on January 28, 2020, and jointly moved for its dismissal with prejudice under
Board Rule 12(b).  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke     
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:   August 31, 2016
CBCA 4620
GBTI SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION
AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Respondent.
Matthew R. Keller of Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C., Reston, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
Stephanie C. Carrigg, Office of the General Counsel, Court Services and Offender
Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
On August 19, 2016, the appellant filed an uncontested motion for voluntary
dismissal, advising that the parties have settled the dispute underlying the appeal.  The Board
commends the parties on reaching a settlement.  Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal
WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge