Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
GRANTED IN PART:  February 21, 2025
CBCA 7101, 7131
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr. of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bend,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges, SHERIDAN, KULLBERG, and SULLIVAN.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
On February 19, 2025, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for judgment
on a stipulated settlement.  The parties requested that the Board enter judgment in the amount
of $50,000 with payment to be made through the judgment fund in accordance with
31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2018) and 41 U.S.C. § 7108.  Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)). 
The parties have agreed that they will not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from
the Board’s decision and that each party will be responsible for its costs, attorney fees, and
expenses incurred in the litigation of these appeals.  Additionally, the parties have stipulated
that interest on the amount of $50,000 will begin to accrue on March 31, 2025, if payment
is not made by that date.  


CBCA 7101, 7131 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART these appeals.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
motion, the Board awards appellant the stipulated settlement amount of $50,000.  Rule 25(b). 
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
We concur:
    Patricia J. Sheridan          Marian E. Sullivan         
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 24, 2020
CBCA 6749
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
Respondent.
R. Dave Murray, President of Electronic Systems Services, Inc., Ft. Worth, TX,
appearing for Appellant.
Heather S. Book, Katherine Allen, and Rachel McGuane, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel
for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 15, 2020, appellant’s representative notified the Board that the dispute
between the parties “has been resolved to each party’s satisfaction.” Accordingly, this appeal
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Allan H. Goodman
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 31, 2025
CBCA 7894
HE MOB 2500, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Mark C. Webb of Voyles Vaiana Lukemeyer Baldwin & Webb, Indianapolis, IN; and
John M. Manfredonia of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC, Cresskill, NJ, counsel for
Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA; and Timothy Saffles, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Redwood City, CA, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 28, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, stating that the underlying dispute has been resolved through settlement.  The
motion is granted, and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Marian E. Sullivan        
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 1, 2024
CBCA 7831
CENSEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Thomas M. Brownell of Holland & Knight LLP, Tysons, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Matthew S. Tilghman, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2022)), this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  May 15, 2007 
CBCA 59, 60 
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Timothy Sullivan and Katherine S. Nucci of Thompson Coburn LLP, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Scarlett D. Grose, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges STERN , FENNESSY , and  SOMERS . 
FENNESSY , Board Judge. 
Paragon Systems, Inc. appealed two decisions of a contracting officer of the 
Department of Homeland Security regarding extra costs incurred for providing guard services 
in the State of Alabama.  On April 18, 2007, the parties filed a joint motion for stipulated 
judgment and a settlement agreement that stated in part: 
Respondent agrees to pay $100,422.24 to Appellant as a price adjustment for 
the change to the contract in modification PC02, with appropriate CDA 
[Contract Disputes Act] interest to be calculated as of the date of payment. 
. . . . 

                                                                                                                   
         
  
   
 
     
 
 
  
  
__________________________ 
_________________________ _________________________ 
2 CBCA 59, 60  
The parties agree to file a Joint Motion for Stipulated Judgment with the 
CBCA requesting the Board to enter judgment consistent with the terms of 
this Settlement Agreement. 
. . . . 
Upon issuance of the judgment, Respondent will file the necessary paperwork 
to effect payment by the Department of Treasury’s Judgment Fund.  Appellant 
will provide any information needed for this purpose. 
The parties also agreed that their settlement agreement constitutes a final resolution 
of the claims brought by appellant and is the basis for their request for dismissal of these 
appeals. The parties agree that such dismissal shall resolve all issues raised by these 
appeals and will foreclose any and all future litigation of issues raised by appellant in or 
related to these appeals. 
The Board adopts the parties’ settlement agreement and, therefore, these appeals are 
GRANTED IN PART .  In accordance with the settlement agreement, the Board awards 
the sum of $100,422.24, plus interest in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act, to be 
paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund.  31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2000). 
EILEEN P. FENNESSY 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
JAMES L. STERN JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  December 19, 2024
CBCA 8228
EMPIRE LEASING, INC. ON BEHALF OF GALLIUM LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Benjamin A. Klopman of The Law Offices of Benjamin A. Klopman, Chartered,
Rockville, MD, counsel for Appellant.
James Scott and Zachary Villemez, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant moves to dismiss the appeal without prejudice.  Respondent does not object. 
Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)), the appeal is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
    Kyle Chadwick                
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
GRANTED:  January 7, 2026
CBCA 8532
GAM3 CONSTRUCTION LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Frank J. Romero, Owner of GAM3 Construction LLC, Tucson, AZ, appearing for
Appellant.
Raul Chiriboga, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department
of Homeland Security, Washington, DC; and Kimberly L. Cohen, Office of Chief Counsel,
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Indianapolis, IN, counsel
for Respondent.
Before Board Judges RUSSELL, KULLBERG, and NEWSOM.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
On July 31, 2025, appellant, GAM3 Construction LLC, appealed the denial of its
requested settlement amount ($1,561,291.69) related to the termination for convenience of
its contract with respondent Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.  On January 6, 2026, the parties filed a joint stipulation and motion for a consent
judgment in appellant’s favor in the amount of $1,561,291.69, the full amount in dispute in
this appeal, with interest to accrue on the judgment starting on July 30, 2025, and running
until the date that appellant receives payment.  In the parties’ stipulation and motion, they


CBCA 8532 2
noted that the settlement amount due to appellant was to be paid through the Permanent
Indefinite Judgment Fund, fully resolved the dispute between the parties, and included all
costs, fees, and interest.  The parties further stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration
of or relief from, and will not appeal, the Board’s decision awarding the stipulated amount. 
See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED.  Respondent shall pay to appellant $1,561,291.69 in full
settlement of this appeal, with interest under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109
(2018), accruing from July 30, 2025, until the payment date.  Appellant agrees to accept the
amount awarded in accordance with this decision in full and final satisfaction of this appeal.
   Beverly M. Russell          
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
We concur:
    H. Chuck Kullberg              Elizabeth W. Newsom     
H. CHUCK KULLBERG ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM
Board Judge Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: August 9, 2019
CBCA 5515
BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
David H. Horton, Daphne, AL, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), BEARDSLEY, and SHERIDAN.  
SOMERS, Board Judge.
On August 5, 2019, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for a stipulated
award.  The parties request that the Board enter judgment in the amount of $113,274.33, with
payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31
U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  The amount includes any costs, interest, and attorney fees to which
appellant, BES Design/Build, LLC, may be entitled.  The parties have agreed that they will
not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision.  


CBCA 5515 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
motion, the Board awards BES Design/Build, LLC, the stipulated judgment amount of
$113,274.33. 
    Jeri Kaylene Somers       
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
We concur: 
    Erica S. Beardsley              Patricia J. Sheridan      
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 17, 2019
CBCA 6346
SECTEK, INC.,
                                                                         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh and Gregory P. Currey of Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP,
Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Michelle A. Davis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 9, 2019, the parties jointly moved that the appeal be dismissed with
prejudice, representing that the matter has been resolved.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: January 14, 2020
CBCA 6688
ANALYTIC SERVICES INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Daniel V. Wright, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary 
of Analytic Services Inc., Falls Church, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Tami S. Hagberg, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human
Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and SHERIDAN.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
On January 10, 2020, appellant, Analytic Services Inc. (ANSER), and respondent,
Department of Health and Human Services, jointly moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of
jurisdiction pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(3) (41 CFR 6101.12(b)(3) (2019)).
ANSER represents that it did not intend its request for an equitable adjustment (REA)
to be a claim under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012) (CDA). 
ANSER also maintains that its REA did not track with the claim certification language
required by the CDA and did not request a contracting officer’s final decision. 


CBCA 6688 2
Decision
Based on these facts, these appeals are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION.
   Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
We concur:
     ALLAN H. GOODMAN                          H. CHUCK KULLBERG           
ALLAN H. GOODMAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 23, 2026
CBCA 8605
BASS & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
Edward T. DeLisle, Andrés M. Vera, and Amaiya L. Johnson of Thompson Hine LLP,
Washington, DC; and Jamar T. King of Thompson Hine LLP, Miamisburg, OH, counsel for
Appellant.
Candice Jackson, Gary L. Charles, Jr., and Daniel B. De Vito, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Education, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VOLK, Board Judge.
ORDER
As requested by the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with
each party to bear its own costs, fees, and expenses.
     Daniel B. Volk               
DANIEL B. VOLK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 16, 2021 
CBCA 6882
AEONRG, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Sarah Reida of Legal Meets Practical, LLC, Naperville, IL, counsel for Appellant.  
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA; and Steven Devine, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Falls Church, VA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The contractor has moved to dismiss with prejudice this appeal, as it no longer seeks
to pursue the dispute.  The termination for cause of its underlying contract is not disturbed. 
With the unopposed motion, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
___________________________________ 
DISMISSED:  April 15, 2010 
CBCA 1867 
  1120 VERMONT AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLP, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Brett D. Orlove of Grossberg, Yochelson, Fox & Beyda, LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas Y. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 4, 2010, the Board docketed the appeal of 1120 Vermont Avenue 
Associates, LLP.   The appeal concerned a dispute over a lease with the General Services 
Administration.  After consultation with the Board, the parties engaged in settlement 
discussions.  On April 7, 2010, the Board received a motion to dismiss in which the parties 
advised the Board that they have resolved all matters and further asked that the appeal be 
dismissed. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 19, 2017
CBCA 5721
VALOR HEALTHCARE, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Stuart B. Nibley and Amy M. Conant of K&L Gates LLP, Washington, DC, counsel
for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 15, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this matter,
advising the Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  Accordingly, the
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 3, 2023
CBCA 7678
PROAIM AMERICAS, LLC dba PROAIM MEDICAL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Stephen R. Snodgrass of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, St. Louis, MO, counsel
for Appellant.
Laetitia Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 28, 2023, appellant advised the Board that the parties had reached a
settlement and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED: October 22, 2013
CBCA 3532
C & S TRUCKING & SALVAGE, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Curtis Milton, President of C & S Trucking & Salvage, Inc., appearing for Appellant.
William H. Butterfield, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 3, 2013, C & S Trucking & Salvage, Inc. filed this appeal concerning
an unresolved claim under commercial bill of lading BAPXX0238, contract requisition
number Z3435362226CE11 for the Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast
Guard.  On September 27, 2013, appellant filed a request to withdraw its appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 29, 2016
CBCA 4864, 5087
DEVAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Stephen D. Knight and Erica J. Geibel of Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, Tysons
Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Greg Walters and Matthew Mussetter, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The Department of Housing and Urban Development entered into a contract with
Deval, LLC (Deval) for the performance of professional loan servicing support services.  A
department contracting officer issued two decisions to Deval under this contract, the first
paying the contractor $172,021.03 less than the amount of certain invoices it had submitted,
and the second demanding payment of $91,412.15.  Deval appealed both of these decisions. 
The first appeal was docketed as CBCA 4864, and the second was docketed as CBCA 5087.


CBCA 4864, 5087 2
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss both appeals with prejudice, stating
that they have executed a compromise settlement and release.
The motion is granted.  The appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
ORDER: July 15, 2015
CBCA 3955
VETERANS GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC,
                                                         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
                                                             Respondent.
R. Grant Stephens, Lexington, KY, counsel for Appellant.
Tracy J. Downing, Office of the Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Nashville, TN, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board was informed that this matter was settled and payment has been received
by appellant.  Accordingly, CBCA 3955 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 11, 2022
CBCA 7179
DMC CONSULTANTS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Samuel S. Finnerty and Anna R. Wright of PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Kelly Y. Burnell, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of the parties’ joint motion to dismiss, filed on April 7, 2022,
in the above-referenced case.  The parties state that they have entered into a settlement
agreement which resolves the dispute and request that the Board dismiss this appeal with
prejudice.  


CBCA 7179 2
In accordance with the parties’ request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: April 2, 2008 
CBCA 1044 
THREE RIVERS TIMBER, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Mike Hanna, Resource Manager of Three Rivers Timber, Inc., Kamiah, ID, appearing 
for Appellant. 
Heather R. Hinton-Taylor, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Ogden, UT, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS  (Chairman), GOODMAN , and DRUMMOND . 
DANIELS , Board Judge. 
Three Rivers Timber, Inc. (Three Rivers) claims reimbursement of costs it incurred 
for bonding premiums under a contract with the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service 
(USDA).  The contract is for land management activities and timber removal in the Payette 
National Forest. A USDA contracting officer denied the claim, and Three Rivers appealed 
his decision to the Board. 
USDA, the respondent in this case, moves the Board to dismiss the appeal for lack of 
jurisdiction.  The agency notes that the contractor received the contracting officer’s decision 
on October 15, 2007; the decision advised the contractor that it could appeal to the Board 

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
      
   
 
 
_________________________ 
_________________________ _________________________ 
2 CBCA 1044 
within the next ninety days; and the appeal was not filed until January 15, 2008.  USDA 
maintains that because the Board has jurisdiction over only those appeals which are filed 
within ninety days of a contractor’s receipt of the subject contracting officer’s decision, and 
this appeal was filed on the ninety-second day after receipt, the Board does not have 
jurisdiction to consider the case.  Three Rivers chose not to file a response to the motion, but 
did ask the Board to rule on the motion. 
USDA’s motion is well taken. 
The Contract Disputes Act of 1978, which governs the Board’s review of contracting 
officer decisions, requires that an appeal of such a decision be filed “[w]ithin ninety days 
from the date of receipt of [the] decision.”  41 U.S.C. § 606 (2000).  This deadline for filing 
has been strictly construed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit because the 
authorization to make the filing is a waiver of sovereign immunity.  A late filing divests the 
Board of jurisdiction to consider the case on its merits.  Renda Marine, Inc. v. United States , 
509 F.3d 1372, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2007); D. L. Braughler Co. v. West , 127 F.3d 1476, 1480 
(Fed. Cir. 1997); Cosmic Construction Co. v. United States , 697 F.2d 1389, 1390 (Fed. Cir. 
1982); Robert T. Rafferty v. General Services Administration, CBCA 617, 07-1 BCA 
¶ 33,577, at 166,340. Because Three Rivers did not file its appeal until after the ninetieth day 
from its receipt of the decision in question, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the 
appeal. 
Decision 
USDA’s motion is granted.  The case is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF 
JURISDICTION . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 14, 2024
CBCA 7884
D2 GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Jay R. Rodne of D2 Government Solutions, New Bern, NC, counsel for Appellant.
Justin D. Ruth, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers,
Department of Homeland Security, Glynco, GA, counsel for Respondent.
KANG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 13, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice 
pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)).  Respondent does not object to the
motion.  The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Jonathan L.  Kang       
JONATHAN L.  KANG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 9, 2021
CBCA 6849
NAGEL SERVICES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Sarah Schauerte Reida of Legal Meets Practical, LLC, Naperville, IL, counsel for
Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 3, 2021, the parties filed a joint request to dismiss the above-captioned appeal
with prejudice.  The parties informed the Board that they settled the appeal and satisfied the
terms of their agreement.  Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2), the request is granted.  The
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke    
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 23, 2013
CBCA 3122
NELCO DIVERSIFIED, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Daniel Nelson, President of Nelco Diversified, Inc., Tampa, FL, appearing for
Appellant.
Cheryl Griffith, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, St.
Petersburg, FL, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The appeal has been settled by means of alternative dispute resolution.  The parties
have advised that payment in full has been made in accordance with the terms of their
settlement agreement, and that all other provisions of that agrement have been satisfied.  They
jointly move that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal hereby is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_______________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 17, 2015
CBCA 4093, 4094
MICROTECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Lewis P. Rhodes of MicroTechnologies LLC, Vienna, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Uri R. Ko, Daniel Hutman, and Samuel P. Piazza, Office of the General Counsel,
Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant has requested that these appeals be withdrawn.  Accordingly, these appeals
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  March 29, 2007 
CBCA 580 
J. KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC.,
                        Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
                        Respondent. 
Axel Bolvig, III, of Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, Birmingham, AL, counsel 
for  Appellant. 
Kenneth B. MacKenzie, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges SHERIDAN , KULLBERG, and WALTERS . 
WALTERS , Board Judge. 
1. On March 23, 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs and appellant filed a Joint 
Motion for Judgment on Stipulated Settlement.  The motion encloses a Stipulation of 
Settlement finally executed on March 23, 2007, and entered into by the parties concerning 
CBCA 580. 
2.  The parties recite that they have reached “amicable resolution” of the issues which 
are the subject of CBCA 580 and jointly move that the Board enter judgment in the amount 
of $2,325,000, which includes “all costs, both direct and indirect, including CDA interest, 
and attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act.” 

       
 
___________________________ 
____________________________ ___________________________ 
2 CBCA 580 
3. Inasmuch as the parties have stipulated the equitable adjustment due J. Kokolakis 
Contracting, Inc. in CBCA 580, their Joint Motion for Judgment on Stipulated Settlement 
is granted.  This appeal is GRANTED IN PART . Appellant is found entitled to 
$2,325,000, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement entered 
into by the parties. 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge Board Judge 

3 CBCA 580 
#18960 CBCA 580 J Kokolakis Contracting Inc. Judgement on Stipulated Settlement.wpd 
3/29/07 Reviewed by:RCW CLH
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 3, 2008 
CBCA 974 
MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 
Respondent. 
John R. Jefferies of Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, counsel for Appellant. 
David Sett, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Federal Highway 
Administration, Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 19, 2007, appellant, Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., appealed the 
final decision of a Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 
contracting officer denying appellant’s claim for additional compensation under contract 
number DTFH68-02-C-00012 for reconstruction of a portion of the Sevenmile-Gooseberry 
Road located in the Fishlake National Forest, Sevier County, Utah. 
On December 2, 2008, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal stating that the 
parties have reached an agreement to settle all disputes arising out of the contract and 
requesting that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 

__________________________________ 
2 CBCA 974
 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 10, 2010 
CBCA 1847 
TRUSTED COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 
Respondent. 
Kenneth A. Kopf, General Counsel of Trusted Computer Solutions, Inc., 
Herndon, VA, counsel for Appellant. 
James L. Weiner and Aaron S. Lax, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 30, 2009, the Board docketed the appeal of Trusted Computer 
Solutions, Inc.  The Board’s January 5, 2010, order directed the contracting officer to issue 
a decision regarding appellant’s claim and suspended all other proceedings in this appeal. 

    
   
______________________ 
2 CBCA 1847 
On March 4, 2010, the parties advised that they had reached a settlement in this 
appeal.  They submitted to the Board a copy of their stipulation for compromise, settlement, 
and release in which they agreed to jointly move for dismissal of this appeal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  February 25, 2025
CBCA 7789
NORTHLAND/CIANBRO, A JOINT VENTURE,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Howard S. Stevens and Meighan G. Burton of Pascale Stevens, LLC, Baltimore, MD,
counsel for Appellant.
James F.H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges LESTER, RUSSELL, and GOODMAN.
LESTER, Board Judge.
On February 10, 2025, appellant, Northland/Cianbro, a Joint Venture (N/C JV), and
respondent, the General Services Administration (GSA), filed a joint motion requesting the
entry of a stipulated judgment in N/C JV’s favor in the amount of $1,425,000, with payment
to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2018). 
Although the parties originally indicated that the judgment amount was inclusive of all
interest under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109, that had accrued before
the date of the Board’s issuance of the stipulated judgment, they did not originally address
whether and, if so, when interest would accrue after entry of the judgment.  The parties
subsequently filed a clarification, agreeing that, if any portion of the judgment remains
unpaid thirty days after the date on which the judgment is entered, CDA interest will begin


CBCA 7789 2
to accrue on the unpaid judgment amount.  The parties have also represented that each party
will bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses incurred as part of this appeal.  The
parties have further stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, and
will not appeal, the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to N/C JV. 
See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  GSA shall pay $1,425,000, inclusive of
accrued interest under the CDA, to N/C JV in full settlement of CBCA 7789, with each party
to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses, with payment to be made through the
permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.  If any portion of the judgment
amount remains unpaid thirty days after the date of this judgment, CDA interest will start to
accrue on the unpaid portion of the judgment amount at that time.  This payment shall be
made in accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 7108 and may be made from the permanent indefinite
judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
We concur:
   Beverly M. Russell              Allan H. Goodman        
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 29, 2012 
CBCA 3054 
EXTREME COATINGS, INC., 
Petitioner, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Anastasia Olson, President of Extreme Coatings, Inc., Pasco, WA, appearing for 
Petitioner. 
James L. Weiner, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Respondent. 
HYATT, Board Judge. 
On November 7, 2012, after receipt of petitioners’s petition requesting the Board to 
direct the contracting officer to issue a decision on its claim, the Board issued an order 
directing the contracting officer to issue a decision on or before December 5, 2012.  
Petitioner has now advised the Board that the claim presented to the contracting 
officer has been settled and that the Bureau of Reclamation has issued a bilateral 
modification to the contract that resolves all of the disputes identified in its claim.  

 
     
________________________________ 
                                                                                                                         2 CBCA 3054
There is no longer any need for a decision to be issued by the contracting officer. 
Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 17, 2019
CBCA 6392
RLS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr. of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for
Appellant.
Mohammad Ezzati, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 15, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice,
indicating that they have settled all claims.  The parties’ motion is granted.  The appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
    Marian E. Sullivan       
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: November 10, 2014
CBCA 3726
WADE PERROW CONSTRUCTION, LLC.,
                                                         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
                                                             Respondent.
John P. Ahlers and Elizabeth Weden Perka of Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC, Seattle,
WA, counsel for Appellant.
Erin Frazee Masini, Lauren K. Didiuk, and Ashley Powers, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
One November 4, 2014, the parties submitted a joint motion to dismiss CBCA 3726.
Accordingly, CBCA 3726 is DISMISSED.  CBCA 4147 and 4148 remain on the Board’s
docket.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 23, 2022
CBCA 6973, 7391
SAW-GREENLAND JV II, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Tara L. Chadbourn of ReavesColey PLLC, Chesapeake, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Laetitia C. Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 16, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these appeals with
prejudice, after having reached a settlement.  The Board grants the parties’ motion, and the
appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
 
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: July 23, 2015
CBCA 4809
BRASFIELD & GORRIE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Laurence Schor, Dennis C. Ehlers, and Robert D. Pratt of Asmar, Schor & McKenna,
PLLC, Washington, DC; and Axel Bolvig III, Luke D. Martin, and J. Christopher Selman of
Bradley Arant Boult & Cummings, LLP, Birmingham, AL, counsel for Appellant.
Stacey North-Willis, Beth Chesney, Benjamin Diliberto, and Charlma Quarles, Office
of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for
Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), HYATT, and VERGILIO.
DANIELS, Board Judge.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC (B&G)
entered into a contract for the construction of a hospital and clinic at the VA’s Medical
Center in Orlando, Florida.  The original contract was in the amount of $276,773,030.
In the course of construction, B&G submitted many claims to the VA.  Among them
was claim 8, for damages the contractor and its subcontractors allegedly incurred during
calendar years 2011 through 2013 as a result of the VA’s allegedly “defective design and


CBCA 4809 2
specifications, delays to performance, directives to perform extra work and failure to
compensate it for the added work and repairs due to VA-responsible causes.”  This claim is
in the amount of $11,131,766.
The VA contracting officer denied the claim.  B&G appealed the decision, and the
Board docketed the appeal as CBCA 4809.
The parties have now filed a joint motion for stipulated judgment pursuant to Board
Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2014)).  In this motion, they ask the Board to award to B&G
$6,261,300, plus interest calculated pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109
(2012), from May 28, 2015, until the date of payment.
The parties state that B&G will not seek attorney fees in conjunction with the
prosecution of these appeals.  The parties state further that they will not seek reconsideration
of, or relief from, a Board decision which awards the stipulated amount, and that they will
not appeal the decision.
Decision
CBCA 4808 is GRANTED IN PART.  The Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay
to Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC, $6,261,300, plus interest calculated pursuant to the Contract
Disputes Act from May 28, 2015, until the date of payment.  This payment may be made
from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
We concur:
_________________________ _________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge Board Judge
_____________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 27, 2007 
CBCA 732 
THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 
Respondent. 
David M. Nadler and Scott Arnold of Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Peter E. Young, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International 
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
FENNESSY , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On May 1, 2007, appellant, The Louis Berger Group, Inc., filed an appeal in 
connection with a dispute relating to contracts 399-0360-C2356, 492-C-00-95-00135, and 
527-C-00-94-00005, with the Agency for International Development.  On September 15, 
2007, appellant notified the Board that this appeal had been settled and requested that it be 
dismissed with prejudice.  
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
EILEEN P. FENNESSY 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 1, 2016
CBCA 5158
VETERANS CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Scott R. Sylkatis of Sylkatis Law, LLC, Amherst, OH, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have settled the appeal, payment of the settlement amount has been made,
and appellant has filed a motion requesting that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the motion is granted and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 11, 2019
CBCA 6297
THE HAMSTRA-APPLETON GROUP LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Paul F. Khoury, Richard B. O’Keeffe, Jr., and Lindy C. Bathurst of Wiley Rein LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Katherine Smyth, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 11, 2019, the appellant filed a request for motion to dismiss the above-
captioned appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
  Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 16, 2008 
CBCA 1068 
XEROX CAPITAL SERVICES, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Nilza Velázquez, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 6, 2008, the Board received from Xerox Capital Services, LLC 
(contractor) a notice of appeal concerning deemed denials of claims totalling $148,060.26 
relating to unpaid invoices. The contractor claims entitlement to payment for delivery and 
performance pursuant to purchase orders with the Department of Homeland Security (the 
Government) issued under the contractor’s contract, GS 25F 0062L, with the General 
Services Administration.  Having received neither payment nor a decision by the contracting 
officer on its claims, the contractor pursues relief at this Board under the Contract Disputes 
Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613, as amended. 
During an initial telephone conference (before the submission of the appeal file, 
complaint, or answer), the parties agreed to stay formal proceedings as they explored the 
issues and resolution.  On September 16, 2008, the Board received a request for a dismissal 
with prejudice; the parties have settled this dispute. 

______________________________ 
2 CBCA 1068 
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE  this appeal. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENIED:  February 14, 2023
CBCA 7024
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Ray Brooks, Vice President of Management Technologies, Inc., Clinton, MD,
appearing for Appellant.
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, GOODMAN, and ZISCHKAU.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
Appellant, Management Technologies, Inc., has appealed a decision by the contracting
officer of respondent, General Services Administration (GSA), demanding repayment of
what GSA asserts is the total amount of overpayments made by GSA to appellant arising
from appellant’s performance of a task order.  The parties have filed cross motions for
summary judgment, which we deny.
This dispute involves the interpretation of a task order issued by GSA to appellant in
2016 for data management.  In mid-2020, the GSA contracting officer reviewed the number
of appellant’s employees that had been performing the work pursuant to the task order and
concluded that appellant had provided fewer than the number of employees required.  In
October 2016, the contracting officer issued a decision demanding repayment of amounts


CBCA 7024 2
representing alleged overpayments for appellant’s invoices previously submitted as the result
of the alleged failure to provide the required number of employees.
Appellant interprets the task order as requiring a fixed price for work ordered and the
number of employees sufficient to perform the work.  Appellant further asserts that it has
performed all work to the satisfaction of GSA, properly billed the fixed price, and denies that
it has been overpaid.
The parties briefed the motions and responded to Board requests, but the record
remains incomplete.  The underlying contract for the task order and a predecessor task order,
both executed in 2015 and entered into a GSA electronic data base, are no longer available. 
Neither party has copies of these documents.  Appellant has stated that its contract manager
previously reviewed the predecessor task order in the electronic data base but not the
contract.  GSA states that the current GSA contracting officer has never reviewed the
underlying contract or the predecessor task order.
The parties’ inability to produce these documents creates disputed issues of material
fact as to their contents, the resolution of which would be relevant to the interpretation of the
task order at issue in this appeal.  Without these documents, we are unable to render an
interpretation of the task order at issue, and the parties’ motions for summary judgment are
therefore DENIED.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Joseph A. Vergilio       Jonathan D. Zischkau
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 26, 2023
CBCA 7541, 7626
CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. (DE), LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
G. Scott Walters and Jonathan R. Mayo of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta,
GA, counsel for Appellant.
Thomas D. Dinackus, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 25, 2023, the parties jointly moved the Board to dismiss with prejudice
these consolidated appeals.  The parties stated that the material terms of the settlement
agreement have been fully satisfied, including execution of a bilateral contract modification
and payment of the settlement amount.  The motion is granted.  The appeals are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
    Patricia J. Sheridan      
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 26, 2022
CBCA 6916
CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
Matthew R. Keller and Kristen L. Loesch of Praemia Law, PLLC, Reston, VA,
counsel for Appellant.
Paula S. Hughes and Jill Siegelbaum, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Education, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 14, 2022, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice the
captioned appeal, having reached a settlement.  The Board commends the parties on the
successful resolution of their dispute.  Accordingly, the captioned appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 2, 2017
CBCA 4747
AD RENDÓN 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Respondent.
James S. DelSordo of Argus Legal, LLC, Manassas, VA, counsel for Appellant.  
James Rhodes and Amy Kiger Crotts, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On June 2, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss, notifying the Board that
respondent has completed payment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement and
asking the Board to dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  The parties’ motion is granted.  This
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. 
Board Judge
RECONSIDERATION GRANTED : March 29, 2016
CBCA 3628-R
PJB JACKSON-AMERICAN, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Robert C. MacKichan, Jr. of Holland & Knight LLP, Washington D.C.; and Jacob W.
Scott of Vedder Price P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Catherine Crow, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, VERGILIO, and POLLACK.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
On March 1, 2016, the parties presented a filing to the Board in which they sought
action regarding finalization of the quantum number in the above proceeding.  We treat the
filing as a motion for reconsideration and as such, address the matter of the quantum.  In our
decision issued on February 11, 2016, we provided the following:
The appeal is granted in part.  Appellant is granted $109,105 associated with
the delay and extra design work.  Appellant is entitled to recover for the
cancellation of the lease in accordance with the guidance set out in this
decision.  Interest is to run from the date on which the contracting officer
received the certified claim.  


CBCA 3628-R 2
PJB Jackson-American, LLC v. General Services Administration, CBCA 3628, 16-1 BCA
¶ 36,248, at 176,854.
In the March 1 filing, both parties have agreed to and identified the total quantum
amount for delay, extra design work, and cancellation as $1,426,675 and identified the date
from which interest will run as April 26, 2013.  In agreeing to the total and the interest date,
the parties confirm that they are both satisfied that the figure is in accordance with our
guidance.  Accordingly, we find the sum of $1,426,675 to be payable to appellant with
interest to run from April 26, 2013.
Decision
Reconsideration is granted, as explained above.
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
We concur:
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge Board Judge