Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 14, 2022
CBCA 6977
BLUMONT, INC. AND BLUMONT ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Steven M. Masiello, Joseph G. Martinez, and Eric Roberson of Dentons US LLP,
Denver, CO, counsel for Appellant.
Rachel B. Cochran and Eugene J. Benick III, Office of the General Counsel, Agency
for International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant has advised the Board that this appeal has been settled and has requested
that the appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 30, 2022
CBCA 7016
ROY ANDERSON CORP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Ralph B. Germany, Jr. of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Jackson, MS; and
Martin R. Salzman and John T. Gallagher of Hendrick Phillips Salzman & Siegel P.C.,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Marcia A. McCree, Natasha Reed, and Alicia Harrington, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal and has requested dismissal of
the appeal with prejudice.  Respondent does not oppose the withdrawal of the appeal.  The
motion is granted, and this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 18, 2017
CBCA 5752
REAGENT WORLD, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Jonathan A. DeMella of Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Seattle, WA, counsel for
Appellant.
Heather M. Self, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 18, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation regarding settlement, stating that the
parties “have reached a settlement of all issues raised in the above-captioned appeal,” and
a joint motion to dismiss the appeal.   Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE this appeal.
__________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 19, 2024
CBCA 7650
INFORMATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
Norman H. Singer of Singer & Associates, P.C., Bethesda, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
José Otero and Robert S. Proudfoot, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 18, 2024, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal, stating that they
have resolved the dispute.  The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 18, 2015
CBCA 3889
BUTT HUT COMFORT STATIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Kenneth B. Arthofer of Arthofer & Tonkin Law Offices, Redding, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
Elin Dugan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco,
CA, counsel for Respondent.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 12, 2015, appellant filed a request for dismissal with prejudice.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_______________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND          
                                                                                         Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 1, 2011 
CBCA 1682 
XEROX CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
 
Respondent. 
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
J. Stephen Brophy, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard, 
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 7, 2009, the Board docketed this appeal. On August 17, 2009, the Board 
suspended proceedings at the request of the parties. The parties subsequently reached a 
settlement in this appeal. 
On May 31, 2011, appellant requested that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 

 
      
______________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 1682 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED: May 30, 2012 
CBCA 2498 
CTI GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 
Respondent. 
Lawrence P. Block of Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Robert D. English, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
This case involves a claim by CTI Global Solutions, Inc. (CTI) under purchase orders 
issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for the provision of services under a 
General Services Administration (GSA) schedule contract. CTI contends that it is entitled 
to be paid for its services at increased hourly rates for two reasons: first, because GSA failed 
to properly process a request for increased rates, and second, because the Department of 
Labor mandated, through wage determinations, increases in the health and welfare benefits 
for CTI’s personnel. 

 
                
                
              
              
            
             
        
_________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2498 
In ruling on motions by the FBI, the Board denied CTI’s appeal with regard to the first 
of these reasons and denied it in predominant part with regard to the second. CTI Global 
Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Justice , CBCA 2498, 12-1 BCA ¶ 34,889 (2011). We 
allowed CTI to present evidence with regard to the portion of the case which survived. 
CTI provided some information to the FBI, and the parties engaged in settlement 
discussions. CTI has now filed a request that the Board dismiss the appeal. 
The request is granted. The case is DISMISSED . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 8, 2021
CBCA 7180-C(7039)
HAMILTON PACIFIC CHAMBERLAIN, LLC,
Applicant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
P. Sean Milani-nia of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Applicant.
Susan M. Chagrin, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this matter and jointly request dismissal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the application is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 22, 2024
CBCA 7670
F.H. CANN & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
James C. Fontana and L. James D’Agostino of Fontana Law Group, PLLC, Tysons,
VA; and David R. Warner and Heather R. Mims of Warner PLLC, Reston, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
Paula Hughes and Marta M. Rajchel, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Education, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER 
On February 21, 2024, pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2022)), the parties filed a joint stipulation requesting dismissal with prejudice.  Accordingly,
the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 5, 2020
CBCA 6473, 6641
MONTAGE, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Shiva S. Hamidinia and Robert Nichols of Nichols Liu LLP, Washington, DC, counsel
for Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Regner, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The appellant moved to dismiss these consolidated appeals with prejudice. 
Accordingly, pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2020)), the appeals
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
_______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 4, 2011 
CBCA 2173 
MACARTHUR & BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 
Respondent. 
Charles R. Marvin, Jr., of Cohen Mohr, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Mark Langstein, Richard S. Brown and Florence Bridges, Office of General Counsel, 
 Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties previously advised that the appeal has been settled, and, by unopposed 
motion filed April 4, 2011, appellant moved that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. The 
motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge 

2 CBCA 2173
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 13, 2024
CBCA 8068
SUNDANCE CHEVROLET,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Sara Spitzley, Title Clerk of Sundance Chevrolet, Grand Ledge, MI, appearing for
Appellant.
Michael D. Tully, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 10, 2024, appellant advised the Board that it wished to withdraw its appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 16, 2015
CBCA 4593
EISG, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION,
Respondent.
John C. Dulske, Joan Kelly Fowler Gluys, and Bryan L. Kost of the Law Offices of
Dulske & Gluys, P.C., San Antonio, TX, counsel for Appellant.
Matthew A. Myers, Sr., and Rebecca A. Rizzuti, Office of the Legal Advisor, United
States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico,
El Paso, TX, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The International Boundary and Water Commission contracted with EISG, Inc. to
complete the construction of the rehabilitation of the Progresso Levee within the Lower Rio
Grande in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas.  The Commission later terminated the
contract for default, and EISG appealed this decision.  
Through mediation conducted by Board Judge Marian E. Sullivan, the parties settled
the case.  They have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the case with prejudice.


CBCA 4593 2
The motion is granted.  The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 26, 2015
CBCA 4306
LANIER CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
M. Michael Egan, Jr. and L. David McCollum of Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones &
Sweeney, LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Harold W. Askins III and Patricia A. Hooks, Office of Regional Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, SC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On November 10, 2014, the Board received from Lanier Contracting Services, Inc.
(contractor) a timely-filed notice of appeal concerning its contract, VA247-12-C-0050, with
the Department of Veterans Affairs (agency).  The contracting officer had denied the
contractor’s claim to recover $98,095.92, in connection with what the contractor deemed to
be changed conditions under the contract to provide building renovations.  The parties have
resolved the dispute.  In accordance with a motion for dismissal with prejudice received on
March 25, 2015, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 20, 2019
CBCA 6350, 6399
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Mary A Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX; and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
In accordance with Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2019)), and in
response to the parties’ joint request for dismissal filed on December 19, 2019, these
consolidated appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 24, 2008 
CBCA 1076 
GLASSLOCK, INC., 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 
Respondent. 
Robert S. Brams, Michael J. Schaengold, and Elizabeth M. Gill of Patton Boggs, 
LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
A. Neil Stroud, Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Research Triangle Park, NC, counsel for Respondent. 
GILMORE, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 12, 2008, GlassLock, Inc. appealed the final decision of an 
Environmental Protection Agency contracting officer, which denied its claim for the 
remaining balance of $1,389,294.38 on a fixed-price purchase order. On July 23, 2008, the 
parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice, stating that they had settled 
the matter.  

______________________________ 
2 CBCA 1076 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
BERYL S. GILMORE 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 19, 2012
CBCA 2313, 2314, 2315
LDB TIMBERLAND OPERATIONS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Ray F. Middleman of Malone Middleman, P.C., Wexford, PA, counsel for Appellant.
Vincent Vukelich, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Milwaukee, WI, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties engaged in alternative dispute resolution and resolved these consolidated
appeals.  Appellant has advised that a settlement agreement has been executed by the parties
and the terms of the settlement agreement have been fulfilled.  Appellant has requested
dismissal of the appeals with prejudice.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
__________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 6, 2015
CBCA 4070
OAKRIDGE SAND & GRAVEL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Jeremy T. Vermilyea and Joaquin M. Hernandez of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt,
P.C., Portland, OR,  counsel for Appellant.
Rayann L. Speakman, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 4, 2015, the appellant filed, with the concurrence of respondent, a request to
dismiss the above-captioned appeal based on a settlement reached by the parties. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge


CBCA 3258 2
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 9, 2024
CBCA 7972
PROGRESSIVE SERVICES CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
David S. Aman of Aman Law, LLC, Beaverton, OR, counsel for Appellant.
Aaron D. Buzawa, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)), this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 18, 2021
CBCA 6913
P.J. POTTER ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Robert E. Korroch and George H. Bowles, Sr., of Williams Mullen, Norfolk, VA,
counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol and Tyler W. Brown, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Decatur, GA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 17, 2021, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement
and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 8, 2016
CBCA 4827
DOUGLAS P. FLEMING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Fred A. Mendicino of Faughnan Mendicino PLLC, Dulles, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Milton Hsieh, Division Counsel, Federal Highway Administration, Department of
Transportation, Sterling, VA, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 7, 2016, the Board received a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice,
stipulating to dismissal of this appeal in accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 27, 2013
CBCA 3223
LEGACY ELECTRIC AUTOMATION & COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Eugene Miron, Project Engineer of Legacy Electric Automation & Communications,
Inc., Willowbrook, IL, appearing for Appellant.
Lisa A. Buechler, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Lakewood, CO,
counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The Department of the Interior’s National Park Service awarded to Legacy Electric
Automation & Communications, Inc. (Legacy) a contract in the amount of $19,993.36 to
perform electrical work at the Cedar Pass Lodge of the Badlands National Park in South
Dakota.  After award, Legacy asserted that the work to be performed was considerably in
excess of the work described in the agency’s solicitation and claimed that it would need an
additional $69,416.04 to perform all the work.  The contracting officer denied the claim, 
maintaining that all the work – including what Legacy contended was additional – was


CBCA 3223 2
described in an attachment to the solicitation.  Legacy appealed the contracting officer’s
decision.
The parties have now resolved their dispute, settling the case by agreeing that the
contract will be terminated for the convenience of the Government, with no costs payable by
either party.  The parties have asked that the case be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 13, 2017
CBCA 5180
AMX VETERANS SPECIALTY SERVICES, LLC,
         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
         Respondent.  
William H. Torrico, Locust Grove, VA; and David Kallus, The Woodlands, TX,
counsel for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent. 
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 12, 2017, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice,
advising that a settlement agreement had been executed and all obligations of the settlement
agreement had been met.  
Accordingly, the Board grants appellant’s motion to dismiss, and this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
______________________
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 18, 2008 
CBCA 1194 
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Keith L. Baker of Barton, Baker, McMahon & Tolle, LLP, McLean, VA, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Kenneth W. Dodds, Office of General Counsel, Small Business Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DeGRAFF , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On May 21, 2008, Intelligence Communications Solutions, Inc. filed a notice of 
appeal in connection with a dispute under contract number SBAHQ06C0035, which had been 
awarded to support development projects that represent the interests of American Indians, 
Native Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians.  On July 17, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion 
to dismiss with prejudice, stating they have settled the dispute. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
MARTHA H. DeGRAFF 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 10, 2010 
CBCA 1816 
THE CFIDS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
 
Respondent. 
Frank S. Swain of Baker & Daniels LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Scott C. Briles and Lorraine Hoffman-Polk, Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS,  Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
The CFIDS Association of America (CFIDS) appealed a Department of Health and 
Human Services (DHHS) contracting officer’s final decision asserting that CFIDS overbilled 
the Government in the amount of $233,711.15 under a contract for education, training, and 
strategy services.  The contracting officer demanded that CFIDS repay this amount to the 
Government. 
CFIDS has moved the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, stating that the 
parties have settled all issues and amounts due as billed and paid, and that no further 
obligations or adjustments are necessary. 

 
__________________________________ 
2 CBCA 1816
 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 24, 2013
CBCA 3477
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
                                                         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
                                                             Respondent.
Mark R. Pohl of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Bonnie Angermann, Office of General Counsel, Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 17, 2013, the parties informed the Board that the above-captioned
appeal had been settled and moved that the appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge


CBCA 3477 2
GRANTED IN PART:  February 16, 2024
CBCA 7502, 7503
HAMIDULLAH, SON OF MOHAMMAD RAJAB,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Enayat Qasimi and Shamsi Maqsoudi of Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Erin M. Kriynovich, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, GOODMAN, and SULLIVAN.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
By decision issued January 17, 2024, the Board granted in part the motions for
summary judgment filed by the parties.  Hamidullah, Son of Mohammad Rajab v.
Department of State, CBCA 7502, et al., 24-1 BCA ¶ 38,495.  In an order issued the same
day, the Board directed the parties to confer and file a joint stipulation as to the amounts
owed, pursuant to the guidance provided in that decision.  If the parties were unable to agree
upon the amounts owed, the Board directed that the parties file their own calculations and
explain why they were unable to agree.  
On February 9, 2024, the parties filed separate responses to the Board’s order. 
Appellant stated that the parties were unable to agree but provided no calculation as to the


CBCA 7502, 7503 2
amounts owed, advising the Board of its intent to appeal the Board’s decision to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Respondent, Department of State (DOS),
calculated the following amounts owed for the two properties covered by the leases with a
worksheet showing the calculations (interest is to be calculated in accordance with the
Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7108(b) (2018)):
Qasemi Lot – DOS owes appellant unpaid rent of $254,669.80, plus interest
calculated from February 2, 2022.
Polaski Lot – Appellant owes DOS a refund of $61,399.65, plus interest calculated
from July 19, 2022.
DOS’s calculations are consistent with the Board’s previous decision.  Accordingly,
we find that these are the amounts owed by the parties pursuant to the leases following the
terminations for convenience.  
Decision
The appeals are GRANTED IN PART.  DOS owes appellant the net of the amounts
set forth above.  
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
We concur:
     Joseph A. Vergilio              Allan H. Goodman        
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 7, 2023
CBCA 7267, 7268
JNI CCC JV1 LLP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Marc Lamer of Kostos and Lamer, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On July 5, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeals with prejudice, 
advising that a settlement agreement had been executed and all claims resolved in full. 
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
    Erica S. Beardsley    
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: March 23, 2016
CBCA 4730
PATRIOT CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Patricia A. Meagher of Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, San Francisco, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
Kate Gorney, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges HYATT, KULLBERG, and SULLIVAN.
HYATT, Board Judge.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Patriot Construction, Inc. (Patriot)
entered into a contract for work to be performed at the Sacramento VA Medical Center in
Mather, California.  During contract performance various disputes arose, giving rise to
Patriot’s claim for an equitable adjustment in the amount of $1,302,792 for additional and
changed work, delay costs, and other related costs. 
The parties have executed a stipulation of settlement, fully resolving all claims and
issues in the appeal.  Under this agreement, the VA has agreed to pay to Patriot the amount
of $500,000 as full and complete compensation for all costs, direct and indirect, including,
but not limited to, impact on both changed and unchanged work, attorney fees, and all
interest associated with the claim asserted in this appeal. 

CBCA 4730 2
The parties have filed a joint motion for stipulated judgment  pursuant to Board Rule
25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2015)).  In this motion, they ask the Board to award to Patriot the
amount of $500,000, inclusive of all interest, in accordance with the terms of the stipulation
of settlement.  The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a
Board decision which awards the stipulated amount, and will not appeal the decision.  
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  The Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay
to Patriot Construction, Inc. the amount of $500,000.  This payment may be made from the
permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012); 41 U.S.C. § 7108. 
_________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
We concur:
______________________________ __________________________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 18, 2009 
CBCA 1404 
AYLWARD ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Henry W. Aylward, President of Aylward Enterprises, Incorporated, Aiea, HI, 
appearing for Appellant. 
Stacey North Willis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 13, 2008, the Board received from Aylward Enterprises, Incorporated 
a notice of appeal regarding contract V786C-520, project 899CM3021, involving the 
Columbarium Phase 2 work at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, Honolulu, 
Hawaii. The notice states that in March 2008 the company requested a decision from the 
contracting officer.  Further, it specifies that the contracting officer has not communicated 
regarding the request.  The appeal is based upon the deemed denial by the contracting officer. 
During an initial telephone conference with the presiding judge and the parties, the 
company, through its president, acknowledged that although it is a subcontractor, it is not the 
contractor under the referenced contract.  After further research into a basis for asserting 
jurisdiction over this matter, the president informed the Board and opposing counsel during 
a telephone conference on February 18, 2009, that the company will not be pursing this 
matter.  The parties agreed to a dismissal with prejudice. 

____________________________ 
2 CBCA 1404 
Decision 
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE  the appeal. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 25, 2016
CBCA 5382
PATRIOT TOWERS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Matthew R. Adams of Patriot Towers, Inc., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Amy M. Siadak, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Lakewood, CO,
counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 24, 2016, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, notifying the Board that they have settled the dispute underlying the appeal.  The
parties’ motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: November 3, 2011 
CBCA 2054 
LOCKHEED MARTIN ASPEN MED SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 
Respondent. 
Joshua C. Drewitz of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, DC; and Robert F. Pezzimenti, 
Associate General Counsel of Lockheed Martin IS&GS Civil, Rockville, MD, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Jonathan A. Baker and Robyn A. Littman, Office of the General Counsel, Department 
of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges BORWICK , HYATT , and DRUMMOND. 
BORWICK , Board Judge. 
This matter involves a claim for additional costs incurred by appellant as a result of 
incorporation of the Service Contract Act into task order HHSP233200900001, awarded 
under blanket purchase agreement HHSP233200530018B. Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), 
the parties have submitted a joint settlement stipulation and a request for a stipulated award 
in which respondent agrees to pay appellant the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) 
inclusive of interest and attorney fees in exchange for a release of claims. The parties 
stipulate that they will not seek reconsideration or relief from the decision and that they will 
not appeal the decision. The Board’s decision is an adjudication of the case on the merits. 

 
             
             
             
                 
    
  
______________________________ 
  
 
 
_______________________________ _______________________________ 
    
  
2 CBCA 2054 
Decision 
Pursuant to the stipulation and the request of the parties, the Board adopts the 
stipulation by decision. The Board GRANTS the appeal IN PART and awards appellant 
$1,000,000, inclusive of interest and attorney fees, to be paid from the permanent indefinite 
judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 7108 (as codified by Pub. L. No. 111-350, 
124 Stat. 3677, 3816 (2011)). 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
CATHERINE B. HYATT JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 18, 2024
CBCA 8188
KPAUL PROPERTIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Charles M. Maynard of The Butler Law Firm, LLC, Bethesda, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
Annemarie  Drazenovich, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Eatontown, NJ, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On November 18, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, stating that the underlying dispute has been resolved through settlement.  The
motion is granted, and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Marian E. Sullivan         
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
______________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 4, 2012 
CBCA 2134 
SINGLETON ENTERPRISES, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Wayne Singleton, Owner of Singleton Enterprises, Luthersville, GA, appearing for 
Appellant. 
Lisa A. Buechler, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior, 
Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 30, 2012, the parties advised the Board that they had executed a settlement 
agreement and requested that this appeal be dismissed. Accordingly, this appeal is 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 29, 2016
CBCA 3470, 3551, 4273 
ASP DENVER, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Neal J. Sweeney and Tyler P. Scarbrough of Jones Walker, LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel
for Appellant.
Lori R. Shapiro and Lesley Uhr, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant, ASP Denver, LLC, has filed a motion advising that the consolidated
appeals have been resolved by the parties and requesting that the Board dismiss the appeals
with prejudice.
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 6, 2016
CBCA 4762
AUTH ROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Patrick L. Brown and Sally Presler McCash of Joseph Greenwald & Laake, P.A.,
Greenbelt, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Elizabeth H. Johnson, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 22, 2015, the Board received from Auth Road Associates Limited Partnership
(lessor) a notice of appeal concerning its contract, GS-11B-00219, with the General Services
Administration (agency).  The appeal was taken based upon a deemed denial of the lessor’s
claim.  The parties resolved the dispute.  In accordance with a joint stipulation received on
January 5, 2016, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 2, 2014
CBCA 3745
CHEROKEE SERVICES GROUP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Antonio R. Franco and Nichole L. DeVries of Piliero Mazza PLLC, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Emily E. Parkhurst, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Lakewood,
CO, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 4, 2014, the Cherokee Services Group appealed the final decision of a
Department of the Interior contracting officer denying its claim for an equitable adjustment
under contract number D11PC18859 for professional documentation search and analytical
services assistance in support of the Federal Government’s historical accounting obligations.
On September 29, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, stating that they have reached a settlement.


CBCA 3745 2
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 2, 2015
CBCA 4656
UNITED BUILDERS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Luis P. Parra, President of United Builders, LLC, Tucson, AZ, appearing for
Appellant.
Keaton Norquist, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 27, 2015, the parties filed a motion to dismiss this matter, advising the Board
that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE:  October 4, 2012 
CBCA 2810 
CECELIA SUTTON, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Cecelia Sutton, pro se, Cleveland, OH. 
Scott F. McCleary, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Chicago, IL, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges SOMERS , BORWICK, and McCANN. 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
For the reasons below, we dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. On June 27, 
2012, after a conference with the parties, we established August 24, 2012, and September 
25, 2012, as the dates for record submissions and reply record submissions, respectively. 
August 24, 2012, came and went, without appellant submitting a record submission. On 
August 29, 2012, we issued an order requesting appellant to state whether she would: (1) not 
supply a record submission of her own, but respond to respondent’s record submission; (2) 
rest on the present record; or (3) abandon the appeal. We asked appellant to respond by 
September 12, 2012, and warned appellant that failure to respond would result in our 
consideration of a dismissal for lack of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. On 
September 14, 2012, we issued an order to show cause why the appeal should not be 
dismissed for failure to prosecute, and ordered appellant’s reply by September 27, 2012. 

        
     
       
       
     
_____________________________ 
____________________________ _____________________________ 
2 CBCA 2810 
Again, appellant did not respond to that order.  
In summary, we issued an initial scheduling order, with which appellant did not 
comply. We have also issued one order asking appellant whether she would proceed with 
the litigation, warning her of the severe consequences of failing to respond to that order, and 
we have given her an opportunity, through our order to show cause, to avoid the 
consequence of a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Appellant has ignored those orders. It 
is abundantly clear that appellant has abandoned the appeal.  
Decision 
This matter is DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
JERI K. SOMERS R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 10, 2012 
CBCA 2056 
KEYSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Richard O. Wood and H. Carl Jenkins of The Wood Burditt Group, Lake Bluff, IL, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Melbourne A. Noel, Jr., and Vanessa L. Calabrese, Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, IL, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties settled this dispute and, on June 27, 2012, jointly moved to dismiss the 
appeal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 7, 2022
CBCA 7249, 7250
NATIONAL CAPITOL CONTRACTING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Lawrence P. Block, Elizabeth G. Leavy, and William T. Kirkwood of Reed Smith
LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Dorothy M. Guy and Virginia A. Pizza, Office of the General Counsel, Social
Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion seeking dismissal of these appeals with prejudice,
representing that they settled the disputes underlying them.  The parties’ joint motion is
granted.  These appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 25, 2021
CBCA 7041
THE WHITESTONE GROUP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jeffrey Weinstein of The Weinstein Law Group, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Tami S. Hagberg and Giovanna S. Jean-Baptiste, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 22, 2021, the parties advised that they had reached a settlement and requested
that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 8, 2016
CBCA 5132, 5233
BURNS ENGINEERING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Christopher I. McCabe of Jacoby Donner, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, counsel for
Appellant.
Stephen F. Pereira, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Transit Administration,
Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
Burns Engineering, Inc. moves to dismiss these appeals with prejudice pursuant to a
settlement.  Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 19, 2022
CBCA 7084
TRIPLE C - THE A&E GROUP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Shaun C. Kennedy and Ryan K. Lundquist of Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO,
counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bend,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant has filed an unopposed notice of voluntary dismissal of this appeal pursuant
to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2021)).  Consistent with appellant’s notice, this
appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 16, 2018
CBCA 5319
MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Larysa M. Kautz of Melwood Horticultural Training Center, Inc., Upper Marlboro,
MD, counsel for Appellant.
Elyssa Tanenbaum, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 10, 2016, the Board received from Melwood Horticultural Training Center,
Inc. a notice of appeal involving contract GS-11P-14-YE-D-0136 with the General Services
Administration.  Formal proceedings were suspended at the request of the parties.  In
accordance with a request of Melwood received on April 11, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE this appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 17, 2020
CBCA 6660
S & DF PROPERTIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Steve Forti, Managing Member of S & DF Properties, LLC, El Paso, TX, appearing
for Appellant.
Erin Hufstetler, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Fort
Worth, TX, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
Consistent with the parties’ joint motion requesting dismissal of this appeal with
prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2), this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
GRANTED: September 3, 2015
CBCA 4350, 4781
ARCHER WESTERN/DeMARIA JV II,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
William E. Dorris and Gautam Y. Reddy of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Khaliah M. Wrenn and Charlma J. Quarles, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC; and Helen S. Henningsen, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs, Milwaukee, WI, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, HYATT, and ZISCHKAU.
HYATT, Board Judge.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Archer Western/DeMaria JV II (AWD)
entered into a contract for the construction of an addition and improvements to the mental
health inpatient and outpatient facility located at the VA Medical Center in Bay Pines,
Florida.  During performance of the contract, a dispute arose concerning whether the VA or
AWD was responsible for supplying fuel oil for the underground tanks for the electrical
generator.  AWD submitted a letter to the contracting officer seeking a determination with
respect to this issue, and the contracting officer decided that AWD was contractually required
to initially fill the tanks.  AWD’s appeal of this decision was docketed by the Board as
CBCA 4350.  AWD filled the tanks with oil and submitted a certified monetary claim to the

CBCA 4350, 4781 2
contracting officer, seeking reimbursement of the amount of $343,601 for the costs it
incurred in complying with the VA’s determination.  The denial of this claim was also
appealed to the Board, and docketed as CBCA 4781.  The two claims were consolidated for
further proceedings and the parties undertook to negotiate a resolution of their differences. 
The parties have now executed a stipulation of settlement, fully resolving all claims
and issues in the consolidated appeals.  Under this agreement, the VA will pay to AWD the
amount of $343,601 in full settlement of all costs, direct and indirect, related to the appeals,
including, but not limited to, all interest.  
The parties have filed a joint motion for stipulated judgment pursuant to Board Rule
25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2014)).  In this motion, they ask the Board to award to AWD the
amount of $343,601, inclusive of all interest, in accordance with the terms of the stipulation
of settlement.  The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a
Board decision which awards the stipulated amount, and will not appeal the decision.
Decision
The appeals are GRANTED.  The Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay to
Archer Western/DeMaria JV II the amount of $343,601.  This payment may be made from
the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).
_________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
We concur:
_________________________________ __________________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 11, 2021
CBCA 6417
U.S. ARMY TACTICAL SUPPLY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Mohammad Wali Mohammad, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Army Tactical Supply,
Abu Dhabi, UAE, appearing for Appellant.
Dennis J. Gallagher, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 7, 2021, appellant requested that the Board dismiss this
appeal.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 6, 2007
CBCA 743
SOUTHERN ARIZONA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
c/o J.K. NORRIS AND COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Richard L. Moorhouse and Sean M. Connolly of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, McLean,
VA, counsel for Appellant.
Nirlip K. Syan, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
PARKER , Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 7, 2007, Southern Arizona Development Group, LLC c/o J.K. Norris and
Company appealed the final decision of a General Services Administration contracting
officer denying appellant’s claim for various tenant improvements under lease number
GS-09B-01693 for a government-leased building in Nogales, Arizona.  On November 5,
2007, appellant filed an unopposed motion for dismissal, stating that the parties have entered
into a settlement agreement.


CBCA 743 2
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
___________________________
ROBERT W. PARKER
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 19, 2015
CBCA 3466
LYNCHVAL SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,
Respondent.
Dana M. Collins and Matthew R. Keller of Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C., Reston,
VA, counsel for Appellant.
Kimberly A. Manganello, Mark L. Hansen, Ryan P. Carpenter, and Katherine Leong,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The appellant has informed the Board that this appeal has been settled and requested
that it be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 6, 2022
CBCA 7158
WASHINGTON BUSINESS DYNAMICS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,
Respondent.
Milton C. Johns of Executive Law Partners, PLLC, Fairfax, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
Brent Durham, Corey Garlick, and Dawn Velarde, Office of the General Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have resolved the dispute.  As requested, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE the appeal.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge