Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
_________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 6, 2009
 
CBCA 1450, 1451, 1452, 1453, 1454
 
1120 VERMONT AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLP,
 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Brett D. Orlove of Grossberg, Yochelson, Fox & Beyda, LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas Y. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
1120 Vermont Avenue Associates (lessor) filed five appeals with the Board, on a 
deemed denial basis, seeking relief regarding various disputes involving leases between 
lessor and the General Services Administration.  By joint motion to dismiss, dated August 
3, 2009, the parties have advised the Board that they have resolved all matters relating to the 
cases and move for dismissal of the appeals.  Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES  the 
appeals WITH PREJUDICE. 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: April 16, 2018
CBCA 5741
NAGEL ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
       Respondent.
David A. Rose and William Castleberry of Rose Consulting LLC, Valdosta, GA,
counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges HYATT, ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
Nagel Architects + Engineers timely appealed in May 2017 from the denial of a
certified claim for $90,998.50.  The parties settled the matter and filed a stipulation
complying with Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b)) for an award of $81,898.65, without
interest if paid before Friday, May 4, 2018.

CBCA 5741 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART the appeal and awards the appellant $81,898.85. 
Interest under 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012) shall accrue on this amount from May 4, 2018, until
the payment date.
 Kyle Chadwick                 
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
  Catherine B. Hyatt                Jonathan D. Zischkau    
CATHERINE B. HYATT JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 12, 2017
CBCA 5499
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Tami S. Hagberg and Richard G. Bergeron, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this appeal and jointly requested dismissal.  Accordingly, the
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________________
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 31, 2018
CBCA 6152
QI TECH, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,
Respondent.
George R.A. Doumar of Doumar Martin PLLC, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Ruth Kowarski Cooke and Robin A. Baum, Office of the General Counsel, Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of appellant’s request for dismissal, filed on October 30, 2018,
in the above-referenced case.  Appellant states that the parties have settled the matter and
requests that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 


CBCA 6152 2
In accordance with appellant’s request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.  
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 29, 2019
CBCA 6069
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Thomas M. Cordova, Office of General Counsel, Department of Energy, Lakewood,
CO, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
On July 25, 2019 the parties filed a joint request for dismissal of the appeal with
prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
GRANTED: October 7, 2010 
CBCA 1879 
DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Scott W. Woehr and Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman, LLP, Arlington, VA, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Heather M. Self, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO , and GOODMAN . 
DANIELS , Board Judge. 
The Forest Service (FS), an agency of the Department of Agriculture, placed a 
delivery order with DLT Solutions, LLC (DLT), under DLT’s General Services 
Administration schedule contract for lease-to-own of Oracle software licenses. FS chose not 
to exercise its option to continue the order. DLT then submitted a claim to the FS contracting 
officer, alleging breach of the contract’s “best efforts” clause and demanding payment of 
$1,053,000 plus interest. DLT later filed this appeal of the contracting officer’s deemed 
denial of the claim. 

 
             
              
                
              
               
               
         
            
             
              
               
          
_________________________ 
  
 
 
_________________________ _________________________ 
    
  
2 CBCA 1879 
The parties have now asked the Board, pursuant to our Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 
6101.25(b) (2009)), to grant the appeal, adopting the parties’ stipulation that FS shall pay to 
DLT $1,053,000 plus interest calculated at rates prescribed for amounts due contractors on 
claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 611 (2006). The stipulation 
provides that interest shall run from the date the claim was submitted to the contracting 
officer, December 3, 2009, until payment of the principal amount is made. The parties state 
that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a Board decision which makes such 
an award, and they will not appeal such a decision. 
Decision 
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED . The Forest Service shall pay to DLT 
Solutions, LLC, the sum of $1,053,000 plus interest at rates prescribed for amounts due 
contractors on claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. Interest shall run from 
December 3, 2009, until payment of the principal amount is made. Payment shall be made 
from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304. 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED:  July 29, 2013
CBCA 2752
TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Respondent.
John C. Dippold and Stephen L. Nourse of Carney Badley Spellman, P.S., Seattle,
WA, counsel for Appellant.
Edward Weber, Richard Brown, Mark Langstein, and Ashley Powers, Office of
General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BORWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 26, 2013, appellant advised the Board that the appeal has been settled and
submitted a motion to dismiss.  Pursuant to Rule 12(c), the appeal is DISMISSED.
  
______________________________
ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 25, 2016 
CBCA 5019
MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Elliott S. Horne, President of Meridian Management Corporation, Ponte Vedra Beach,
FL, appearing for Appellant.
Catherine Crow, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board has received appellant’s correspondence, dated April 18, 2016, requesting
the dismissal of the above-captioned appeal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 7, 2015
CBCA 4912
SEVEN CORNERS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Stephen P. Withee and Laura Leister of Frost Brown Todd LLC, Columbus, OH,
counsel for Appellant.
William D. Robinson and Oleta L. Vassilopoulos, Office of General Counsel, Federal
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 3, 2015, representing that they have reached a mutually agreeable
settlement in matter, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the above-captioned appeal with
prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 15, 2011 
CBCA 65 
JANET M. NESSE, TRUSTEE, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 
Respondent. 
Janet M. Nesse and Lawrence P. Block of Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Jennifer L. Longmeyer-Wood, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
USProtect Corporation (USProtect) claimed that pursuant to requirements of the 
Service Contract Act, it was entitled to an increase of $439,387.15 in payments under a 
contract with the Department of Homeland Security for the provision of guard services at 
various federal buildings in California.  In 2005, the contractor appealed to the Department 
of Transportation Board of Contract Appeals from the contracting officer’s deemed denial 
of the claim. When that board was consolidated into the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals 
in 2007, this case was transferred to us. 

 
          
              
            
            
               
    
             
     
          
_________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 65 
USProtect subsequently filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, 
and Janet M. Nesse was appointed trustee for the estate of the corporation. Following 
lengthy settlement negotiations, the trustee represents that she and the United States reached 
a global resolution of all claims between USProtect and the Federal Government, including 
the one at issue in this case. The settlement agreement was approved by the Bankruptcy 
Court on November 21, 2011. 
On December 14, 2011, the appellant (now Ms. Nesse as trustee) moved the Board 
to dismiss this case with prejudice. 
The motion is granted. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 19, 2017
CBCA 5348
DELL SERVICES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, INC.,
           Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Jennifer A. Mahar, Stephen D. Knight, and Daniel Q. Horner of Smith Pachter
McWhorter PLC, Vienna, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Stephen T. O’Neal, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 14, 2017, the appellant filed a joint request to dismiss the captioned appeal
based on a settlement reached by the parties.  The Board commends the parties on reaching
a settlement of their dispute.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 5, 2016
CBCA 3868, 3869, 4687, 4688, 4745
GONZALES CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Mark J. Meagher of Dentons US LLP, Denver, CO, counsel for Appellant.
Timothy J. Lorenzi, Office of General Counsel, Department of Homeland Security,
Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Protective Service (FPS) contracted
with Gonzales Consulting Services, Inc. (GCS) to staff call centers (known as
“MegaCenters”) in Battle Creek, Michigan; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Suitland, Maryland;
and Denver, Colorado.  These centers answer dispatching calls from security personnel at
federal facilities and monitor alarm systems at those facilities.  The centers have been called
the Federal Government’s “911 emergency response service.”  
Disputes arose between the parties as to payment for the services provided by GCS
under these contracts.  Each party made claims against the other, contracting officer decisions
were issued, and appeals were taken.  The appeals involving the Battle Creek center were


CBCA 3868, 3869, 4687, 4688, 4745 2
docketed as CBCA 3868 and 4687; the appeals involving the Philadelphia center were
docketed as CBCA 3869 and 4688; and the appeal involving the Suitland center was
docketed as CBCA 4745.
The parties engaged in an alternative dispute resolution session with the presiding
judge in September 2015.  They had agreed in advance that during the session, the judge
would mediate the disputes with the objective of having the parties reach a voluntary
settlement of the cases, but that if the mediation were to fail to achieve this objective, the
parties would submit the cases to binding arbitration, with the judge issuing an unappealable
decision.  The parties did not resolve the cases voluntarily.  Accordingly, the judge issued a
binding, unappealable arbitration decision.
The parties have now complied with the judge’s arbitration decision and have jointly
moved the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice.
The motion is granted.  CBCA 3868, 3869, 4687, 4688, and 4745 are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 21, 2018
CBCA 6162
CROWN AGENTS USA, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Jason P. Matechak and Jeffrey Marburg-Goodman of Impresa Legal Group, Arlington,
VA, counsel for Appellant.
R. René Dupuy and John Alumbaugh, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for
International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 20, 2018, appellant’s counsel filed a notice of withdrawal of appeal which
stated: “Upon direction from Appellant, counsel withdraws its appeal in the above captioned
matter.”  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 9, 2016
CBCA 4428
DEKATRON CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
Ralph C. Thomas, III of Baker, Cronogue, Tolle & Werfel, LLP, McLean, VA,
counsel for Appellant.
David R. Koeppel and Colin W. O’Sullivan, Office of the Solicitor, Department of
Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 8, 2016, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement and
requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
____________________________  
                           
                           
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 23, 2011 
CBCA 2306 
BLUE ROCK CONSTRUCTION, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Margaret H. Olson of Hobbs & Olson L.C., Salt Lake City, UT, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Heather R. Hinton-Taylor, Office of the General Counsel, Department of 
Agriculture, Ogden, UT, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 18, 2011, the Board received a joint motion to dismiss appellant’s 
appeal and the Government’s counterclaim with prejudice, having previously notified the 
Board that the parties had reached a settlement. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, 
and Rule 12(c), this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 

 2 CBCA 2306
_______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 10, 2009 
CBCA 1577 
BUSINESS WORLD COMPANY, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 
Respondent. 
David E. Dilley, Law Office of David E. Dilley, PLLC, San Antonio, TX, counsel for 
Appellant.  
Mark Langstein and Lauren Kalish, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for 
Finance and Litigation, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Respondent. 
GILMORE, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 25, 2009, the parties in the above-styled appeal filed a Joint Motion to 
Dismiss with Prejudice, advising that the parties had settled the appeal.      
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
BERYL S. GILMORE 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 19, 2020
CBCA 6736(5942)-REM, 6737(5943)-REM, 6738(5944)-REM,
6739(5945)-REM, 6740(5946)-REM
DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES, INC. on behalf of ERSM (AFGHANISTAN)
LIMITED dba EDINBURGH INTERNATIONAL,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Armani Vadiee and Todd M. Garland of Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, Tysons
Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
John B. Alumbaugh and Eugene J. Benick III, Office of the General Counsel, Agency
for International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On May 19, 2020, the parties filed a request for dismissal of the above-referenced
matters. In accordance with the parties’ request, these appeals areDISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
Jeri Kaylene Somers
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: January 15, 2013
CBCA 2959
OCÉ NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman LLP, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Christopher M. Johnson and Brian C. Caney, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Kansas City, MO, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), BORWICK, and DRUMMOND.
BORWICK, Board Judge.
Thies appeal involves claims for an equitable adjustment for past due property taxes
arising out of blanket purchase agreement HSP350200900123B issued under GSA’s schedule
contract GS-25F-0060M. 
Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), the parties have submitted a joint settlement stipulation
stipulating to the award of $232,768.  The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration
of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and they will not appeal the decision.
  
The Board adopts the parties’ stipulation by decision.  Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b),
the Board’s decision is an adjudication on the merits.  


CBCA 2959 2
Decision
This appeal is GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $232,768.  Payment is to be
made in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304.
_______________________________
ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
_______________________________ ________________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 21, 2024
CBCA 7440, 7441, 7446, 7656, 7663, 7701, 7702, 7703, 7713, 7745, 7749, 
7757, 7796, 7797, 7798, 7799, 7804, 7851, 7861, 7959, and 7960
FRAMACO INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Douglas L. Patin and Erik M. Coon of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
Washington, DC; and Sam Z. Gdanski and Abraham S. Gdanski of Gdanski Law PC,
Teaneck, NJ, counsel for Appellant.
Thomas D. Dinackus, Matthew S. Tilghman, and Alexandra N. Wilson, Office of the
Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel
for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 18, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion for dismissal with prejudice
pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)) and the terms of their
September 16, 2024, settlement agreement.  The parties’ joint motion is granted. 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell          
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 5, 2025
CBCA 8286
LAPIS MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FZ LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Anthony Bates and Abdul Nafay Khaleeq of Lapis Middle East and Africa FZ LLC,
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, counsel for Appellant.
Matthew S. Tilghman, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VOLK, Board Judge.
ORDER
As requested by the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
     Daniel B. Volk               
DANIEL B. VOLK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 8, 2019
CBCA 6362
BVB CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Richard Shuben, Law Office of Richard Shuben, counsel for Appellant.
Eyvonne Alson, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 7, 2019, a telephone conference was conducted between the undersigned and
parties’ counsel.  During that conference the parties jointly requested the above-captioned
appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
  Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 2, 2011 
CBCA 2521, 2550 
DRENNON CONSTRUCTION & CONSULTING, INC. 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Traeger Machetanz and Jessy J. Vasquez of Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, 
Anchorage, AK, counsel for Appellant. 
Eric R. Trew, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Lakewood, 
CO, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
Drennon Construction & Consulting, Inc. (Drennon) and the Department of the 
Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) entered into a contract under which Drennon 
was to reconstruct and widen the Tangle Lakes Access Road in an area west of Paxson, 
Alaska. Drennon filed with the Board appeals of three contracting officer decisions 
regarding claims made under the contract. In CBCA 2391, Drennon contends that BLM 
owes it $167,605.04 as a result of defective specifications, differing site conditions, and 
suspension of work. In CBCA 2521, the contractor maintains that it is due $75,124.10 to 
compensate it for costs incurred to perform work which was outside the scope of the contract. 

  
           
             
     
             
    
             
               
       
_________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2521, 2550 
In CBCA 2550, Drennon challenges the contracting officer’s determination that BLM made 
overpayments in the amount of $28,375 to the contractor and that the contractor must 
reimburse the agency for those overpayments. 
Following a mediation session conducted by a Board judge, the parties have filed a 
joint motion to dismiss CBCA 2521 and CBCA 2550 with prejudice. They report that they 
have settled these two cases through the issuance of a contract modification which provides 
for the payment by BLM to Drennon of $44,277.21. CBCA 2391 remains before the Board. 
As requested by the parties, CBCA 2521 and CBCA 2550 are DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  July 11, 2025
CBCA 8047(6814)-REM
CARING HANDS HEALTH EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Edward J. Tolchin of Offit Kurman, PA, Bethesda, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges RUSSELL, GOODMAN, and CHADWICK.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
Appellant, Caring Hands Equipment & Supplies, LLC, and respondent, the
Department of Veterans Affairs, filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated
judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $650,000.  Appellant waives any right it may
have to claim for recovery of interest, attorney fees, costs, and expenses that it may have
incurred in conjunction with the appeal, except that, if the settlement amount remains unpaid,
Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2018), interest will begin to accrue ninety
days from the date of this judgment and continue to accrue until payment is made.  The
parties have stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal


CBCA 8047(6814)-REM 2
the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to appellant.  See Rule 25(b)
(48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  Respondent shall pay $650,000 to appellant
in full settlement of CBCA 8047(6814)-REM, with CDA interest beginning to accrue ninety
days from the date of this judgment if payment has not yet been made and continuing to
accrue until the payment date.  Appellant waives any further right it may have to claim for
recovery of interest, attorney fees, costs, and expenses that it may have incurred in
conjunction with the appeal.
    Allan H. Goodman         
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Beverly M. Russell              Kyle Chadwick               
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED: July 29, 2013 
CBCA 3284
ALLEN ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
William L. Bruckner of Bruckner Law Firm, San Diego, CA, counsel for Petitioner.
David Sett, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration, Department
of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 5, 2013, Allen Engineering Contractor, Inc. (petitioner) filed a petition
requesting the Board to order the contracting officer to issue a final decision on its claim
under contract number DTFH68-10-C-00015 for reconstruction of a portion of the Generals
Highway located in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park in Tulare County, California.
On July 26, 2013, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this petition, along with a copy
of the contracting officer’s final decision, dated July 12, 2013.


CBCA 3284 2
Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 31, 2023
CBCA 7163
ATS TRANS LLC dba AROUND THE SOUND/TRANSPRO,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Howard W. Roth, III, and Nicole E. Wolfe of Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Seattle,
WA, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 30, 2023, appellant filed a consent request to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice based on a settlement agreement resolving all matters in the appeal.  The Board
commends the parties on their settlement of the dispute.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: September 8, 2020
CBCA 6666
EAGLE ACQUISITION VI, LLC dba CONCORDIA
TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHABILITATION - ELIZABETH CITY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Tenley A. Carp of Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Washington, DC; and David L.
Hobson of Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, SULLIVAN, and RUSSELL.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
On September 2, 2020, the parties jointly moved for entry of a stipulated judgment in
the amount of $369,210.38 (settlement amount), to be paid to appellant, Eagle Acquisition
IV, LLC (Eagle), through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31
U.S.C. § 1304 (2018).  See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2018)).  The settlement amount
is inclusive of all costs, fees, and interest.  Interest calculated pursuant to the Contract
Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109, on the settlement amount shall begin to accrue on
October 6, 2020, if payment has not been made to Eagle by that date and shall continue to


CBCA 6666 2
accrue until payment is made.  The parties state that they will not seek appeal of,
reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision. 
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART the appeal.  Eagle shall be paid $369,210.38, plus
CDA interest to run from October 6, 2020, until payment is made.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Erica S. Beardsley             Beverly M. Russell           
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge Board Judge
_______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 24, 2010
 
CBCA 1385, 1386
 
XEROX CORPORATION,
 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Richard D. Lieberman and Gabriel D. Soll of McCarthy, Sweeney& Harkaway, P.C., 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The Board has been notified that the appeals have been settled and that payment 
obligations under the settlement agreement have been met.  Appellant has moved that the 
appeals be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE. 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: August 28, 2014
CBCA 2812
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jonathan S. Aronie, Louis D. Victorino, and Ryan E. Roberts of Sheppard, Mullin,
Richter & Hampton LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Jason A. Blindauer and Christopher M. Johnson, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, DRUMMOND, and SHERIDAN.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
The above-captioned appeal was filed on April 12, 2012, and involves twenty-six
claims which Xerox supplemented with additional, allegedly unpaid invoices on August 24
and 28, 2012.  
On August 25, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion for entry of decision by
stipulation, which states in relevant part:


CBCA 2812 2
As of August 8, 2014, the parties reached a global settlement regarding
all twenty-six claims (including added invoices) arising out of this case;
By executing their Settlement Agreement and filing this Motion, the
parties hereby stipulate to a Decision by the Board awarding two hundred and
sixty nine thousand, two hundred and fifty nine dollars, and seventeen cents
($269,259.17) to Xerox, as payee; and
The parties further stipulate as follows: (a) they will not seek
reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision; (b) they will not appeal
the decision; and (c) they understand that the Board’s decision pursuant to this
joint motion is an adjudication of the case on the merits. 
Decision
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties and Rule 25(b), the Board adopts the parties’
joint motion for entry of decision by stipulation, and in accordance with the parties’
settlement agreement, the Board enters judgement as requested.  This appeal is GRANTED
IN PART in the amount of $269,259.17, inclusive of interest and costs, to be paid in
accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012). 
__________________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
We concur:
_______________________________ _____________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 13, 2023
CBCA 7552
SEABEE CONSTRUCTION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Jonathan A. DeMella of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2021)), this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 5, 2019
CBCA 6327
AHTNA CONSTRUCTION AND PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Rodney M. Perry of Holland & Knight LLP, Washington, DC; and Robert J. Misulich
of Holland & Knight LLP, Anchorage, AK, counsel for Appellant.
Jack F. Gilbert, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 1, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned
appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 7, 2010 
CBCA 1248 
HOUSTON TC INVESTORS, L.P., AND HOUSTON
 
JC INVESTORS, L.P.,
 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Robert C. MacKichan, Jr., and William M. Pannier of Holland & Knight LLP, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On January 5, 2010, the appellant filed its Sixth Status Report and Request for 
Dismissal, therein advising the Board that the above captioned appeal has been settled. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 4, 2013
CBCA 3502
RHINO CONTRACTORS, LLC,
                                                         Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                                                             Respondent.
Shawn R. Farrell of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, P.C., Philadelphia,
PA, counsel for Appellant.
David M. Stauss and Robert Huddle, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Agriculture, Temple, TX, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 31, 2013, representing that the matters in dispute had been amicably
settled, the parties jointly stipulated to a dismissal with prejudice of the above-captioned
appeal.  Accordingly, CBCA 3502 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED:  March 26, 2015
CBCA 4083, 4092
ARTIS BUILDERS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Williams L. Bruckner and Thomas M. Regan of Bruckner Law Firm, APC, San
Diego, CA, counsel for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, STERN, and ZISCHKAU.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
On October 15, 2014, respondent filed a motion to dismiss these consolidated appeals
on the ground that the Board’s initial scheduling order set the date for filing of the complaint
as October 14, 2014, but appellant actually filed the complaint on October 15, 2014.
Respondent’s motion is entirely without merit.  First, as noted in the Board’s order
issued on October 16, 2014, the Board had previously held a status conference with the
parties on September 16, 2014, at which time the parties advised that they desired to mediate
their dispute.  At that September 16 conference, the Board suspended the deadlines for
pleadings and the Board advised the parties that they should consult with whoever would be
appointed as the Board neutral to identify the specific materials that the Board neutral would
need to effectively assist the parties in mediating the dispute.  Thus, appellant did not violate
any order by the Board under the initial scheduling order when it filed a complaint on


CBCA 4083, 4092 2
October 15, 2014.
Decision
Respondent’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.
Appellant shall provide to respondent by close of business March 26, 2015, a
breakdown of the incurred costs of performance, as discussed in the March 25 status
conference.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
We concur:
_____________________________ _______________________________
JERI K. SOMERS JAMES L. STERN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED: October 21, 2013
CBCA 3456
INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP, LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Edward Jackson and W. Jay DeVecchio of Jenner & Block, LLP, Washington,
DC; and Mark J. Stechschulte, Vice President of International Resources Group, Ltd.,
Chantilly, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Natalie Thingelstad, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BORWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 4, 2013, appellant advised the Board that the appeal has been settled
and submitted a motion to dismiss.  Pursuant to Rule 12(c), the appeal is DISMISSED.
____________________________
ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 16, 2013
CBCA 2902
PEPCO ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Thomas R. Freeman of Freeman & Freeman, P.C., Rockville, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
John S. Toby, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 19, 2012, Pepco Energy Services (PES) filed a notice of appeal of the General
Services Administration’s denial of PES’s notice of claim in connection with contract GS-
00P-06-BSD-0394.  On January 9, 2013, the parties, having fully and finally settled the case,
filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.  Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. 
                                                         
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 18, 2016
CBCA 4706, 5145
LEAGUE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, LLC
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Respondent.
Todd R. Overman and Bryan R. King of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC, Washington DC,
counsel for Appellant.
William D. Robinson and Oleta L. Vassilopoulos, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
Pursuant to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures under Board Rule 54
with Judge Walters acting as their mediator, the parties were able to resolve all issues in the
consolidated appeals and have filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.  Accordingly,
the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
_______________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 17, 2022
CBCA 7248
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Michael A. Schollaert and Kyle S. Kushner of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell
& Berkowitz, PC, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Michael Kiffney and Scott Dalton, Office of Chief Counsel, Transportation Security
Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 12, 2022, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement and
requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: March 5, 2013
CBCA 2590(1165)-REM
ENGAGE LEARNING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Ellis B. Freatman, III and Virginia A. Cardwell of Roberts & Freatman, Ypsilanti, MI,
counsel for Appellant.
Sarah T. Zaffina, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges STERN, HYATT, and KULLBERG.
HYATT, Board Judge.
This appeal challenged a contracting officer’s decision denying a claim for payment
for services rendered by appellant, Engage Learning, Inc., for technical and training
assistance for schools operated by respondent, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). 
Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2012)), the parties have submitted
a joint motion for judgment on a stipulated settlement in the amount of  $75,000, to be paid
from the permanent indefinite judgment fund.  The have also agreed that if the payment is


CBCA 2590(1165)-REM 2
not made to Engage Learning within thirty days of the Board’s order entering judgment,
Contract Disputes Act interest shall begin to accrue on that date and will continue to accrue
until payment is made to Engage Learning.  In accordance with Board Rule 31, the parties
state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and they
will not appeal the decision.
Decision
These appeals are GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $75,000.  Payment is to
be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304
(2006).  In the event that payment is not made within thirty days of the date of this order,
additional interest in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (Supp.
IV 2011), will begin to accrue on that date and will continue to accrue until payment is made
to Engage Learning.
__________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
We concur:
________________________________ __________________________________
JAMES L. STERN H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 31, 2014
CBCA 3694-C(2235)
RUSSELL SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.,
Applicant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Mickey Beisman of Law Offices of Mickey Beisman, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for
Applicant.
Luisa M. Alvarez, Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission, El Paso, TX, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
Russell Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. filed an application for fees and other expenses
allegedly incurred in prosecuting a case which was decided by this Board, Russell Sand &
Gravel Co. v. International Boundary & Water Commission, CBCA 2235, 13 BCA ¶ 35,455. 
In response to an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed as prematurely
filed, the applicant has withdrawn the application.


CBCA 3694-C(2235) 2
Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its reinstatement
at a time permitted by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2012).
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: December 6, 2017 
CBCA 5898 
COOVERCLARK & ASSOCIATES,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
Jon Taylor Benson of Benson Law Office, Colorado Springs, CO, counsel for
Appellant.
Dennis Adelson and Savannah L. Wilson, Office of the Solicitor, Department of
Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), BEARDSLEY, and RUSSELL.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
Appellant, Cooverclark & Associates (Cooverclark), submitted a request for an
equitable adjustment (REA) to the contracting officer.  Cooverclark appealed the contracting
officer’s final decision.  After issuing her final decision, the contracting officer informed
Cooverclark in response to its request to continue joint discussions that “the Government is
willing to meet with your firm to further discuss the REA.”  Subsequently, the contracting
officer formally rescinded her decision.  The parties have jointly requested that the appeal
be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. 


CBCA 5898 2
The Contract Disputes Act provides that all claims relating to government contracts
shall be the subject of decisions by contracting officers.  41 U.S.C. § 7104(a) (2012).   In the
absence of a contracting officer’s final decision or the passage of time leading to a deemed
denial, we do not possess jurisdiction over the appeal.  See, e.g., Olympus America Inc. v.
Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 5594, 2017 WL 214386 (Jam. 17, 2017); American
Business Corp. v. Department of Labor, CBCA 637, 07-1 BCA ¶ 33,524 (citing Monster
Government Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Homeland Security, DOTBCA 4532, 06-1 BCA
¶ 33,236, aff’d on reconsideration, 06-2 BCA ¶ 33,312 (citations omitted)).  
Decision
The appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.  
___________________________
JERI K. SOMERS
Board Judge
We concur:
_______________________________ ____________________________
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge Board Judge
___________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: September 11, 2012 
CBCA 2654 
MAGWOOD SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., and Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, PC, Auburn, NY, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Leonard Lucas, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 6, 2011, Magwood Services, Inc. (Magwood) appealed the final 
decision of a General Services Administration contracting officer terminating for default 
contract number GS-03P-10-QM-C-0077 concerning the renovation of the fourth- and fifth-
floor bathrooms in the Powell Courthouse Annex in Richmond, Virginia. On September 7, 
2012, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 26, 2008 
CBCA 407, 413 
ACQUEST GOVERNMENT HOLDINGS, OPP, LLC, 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Richard F. Greenleaf, Julie M. Earnest, and Daniel M. Gross of Berg Hill Greenleaf 
& Ruscitti LLP, Boulder, CO, counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
GILMORE, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
In CBCA 407, appellant appealed a final decision of the contracting officer assessing 
liquidated damages in the amount of $504,000. In CBCA 413, appellant appealed the final 
decision of the contracting officer denying its claim of $2,639,789.82 for alleged constructive 
change orders and excusable delays.  The two appeals were consolidated. On September 23, 
2008, the parties notified the Board that they settled the disputes and jointly request dismissal 
with prejudice.  

_______________________________ 
2 CBCA 407, 413 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
BERYL S. GILMORE 
Board Judge
________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 6, 2009
 
CBCA 1569
 
XEROX CORPORATION,
 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Ronald Sullivan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Austin, TX, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Xerox Corporation filed an appeal with the Board, on a deemed denial basis, seeking 
relief regarding a claimed failure of the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay to Xerox 
under contract no. GS-25F-0062L.  By notice of dismissal dated July 27, 2009, Xerox 
moved to dismiss the action with prejudice.  Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES Xerox’s 
appeal WITH PREJUDICE. 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 8, 2017
CBCA 5821
FORTIS NETWORKS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
David A. Rose of Rose Consulting LLC, Valdosta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Ryan A. Black, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Salt Lake City, UT,
counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of the respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal.  Respondent
states that the parties have reached a settlement agreement and requests that the Board
dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  Respondent further states that appellant concurs with the
request.
This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
___________________________
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 1, 2024
CBCA 7800
RELYANT GLOBAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Jared S. Garceau of RELYANT Global, LLC, Maryville, TN, counsel for Appellant.
Matthew S. Tilghman, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)), this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 29, 2019
CBCA 6189
DEWITT & COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Christopher R. Shiplett, Michael G. Snytkin, and Nishat Azam of Randolph Law,
PLLC, Falls Church, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Eyvonne Mallett Alston, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 16, 2019, appellant filed a renewed request for dismissal with prejudice,
advising that the parties had successfully settled this appeal.  The Board commends the
parties on their settlement, and consistent with appellant’s request and Board Rule 12(b)(2),
this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
   Beverly M. Russell       
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge