Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  August 19, 2025
CBCA 8456
GAM3 CONSTRUCTION LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Frank J. Romero, Owner of GAM3 Construction LLC, Tucson, AZ, appearing for
Appellant.
Kimberly L. Cohen, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security, Indianapolis, IN; and Raul Chiriboga, Office of Chief
Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Washington,
DC, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 18, 2025, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal pursuant to
Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024)).  In their motion, the parties explained
that CBCA 8456 and CBCA 8532 contain duplicative claims and ask that the Board dismiss
CBCA 8456, without prejudice, and resolve the claims in CBCA 8532.  The parties’ motion
is granted.  Accordingly, this appeal, CBCA 8456, is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.


CBCA 8456 2
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 28, 2008 
CBCA 56 
MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL,
                                      Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
                                         Respondent. 
Kirk J. McCormick of Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP, McLean, 
VA, counsel for Appellant.  
Todd Bailey and David Erlewine, Office of General Counsel, Federal 
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 21, 2008, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal requesting 
that the Board dismiss the appeal with prejudice, as the case had been settled. 1 
This matter was originally appealed to the Department of Transportation 
Board of Contract Appeals. See Medical Development International LTD, Inc. v. 
Department of Justice , DOT BCA 4547, 06-2 BCA ¶ 33,405. Pursuant to Pub. L. 
No. 109-163, § 847, 119 Stat. 3136 (2006), the appeal was transferred to the 
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. 
1 

__________________________ 
2 CBCA 56
 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 12, 2019
CBCA 6187
M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
J. Chris Haile and Skye Mathieson of Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Jay Bernstein and Michael Converse, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 11, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion for dismissal, requesting the
appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 7, 2024
CBCA 7569
KMK CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Dannel C. Duddy of Harman, Claytor, Corrigan, & Wellman, P.C., Richmond, VA;
and James E. Krause of James E. Krause, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, counsel for Appellant.
Laetitia Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 2, 2024, appellant, KMK Construction, Inc. (KMK), filed a motion
seeking to dismiss this appeal with prejudice in accordance with Board Rule 12(b)(2)
(48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)) following the parties’ settlement of the dispute underlying
the appeal.  KMK’s motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
___________________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 4, 2011 
CBCA 1210, 1766 
TECHSOLUTIONS, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 
Respondent. 
John F. Mardula of The Marbury Law Group, PLLC, Reston, VA, counsel for 
Appellant. 
David K. Barnes, Office of Associate Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, 
Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
On March 31, 2011 the parties submitted a consent order to dismiss the above-
captioned appeals with prejudice, having reached a settlement with the assistance of Judge 
Allan H. Goodman, acting as mediator. As requested by the parties, the appeals are 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 18, 2012
CBCA 3038
EDMOND COMPUTER CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman, LLP, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.
David Godwin and Richard M. Sudder, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 13, 2012, representing that they had amicably resolved the matters in
controversy through a negotiated settlement, the parties submitted a joint motion requesting
that the Board enter an order dismissing this appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly, CBCA
3038 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
_________________________________
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 13, 2020
CBCA 5913
J. KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Axel Bolvig III of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL; and
Thomas Lynch of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Khaliah W. McLaurin, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 12, 2020, the parties filed a joint motion for dismissal, requesting the appeal
be dismissed with prejudice. The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
Allan H. Goodman
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: June 7, 2019
CBCA 6491
COMPUTER INTEGRATION & PROGRAMMING SOLUTIONS CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Ravi Bhutani, President of Computer Integration & Programming Solutions Corp.,
Bethesda, MD, appearing for Appellant.
Susan Colarco, Office of Chief Counsel, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, KULLBERG, and O’ROURKE.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
On May 23, 2019, the Board received from Computer Integration & Programming
Solutions Corp. (contractor) a notice of appeal concerning a contract with the Drug
Enforcement Administration of the Department of Justice (agency).  In the underlying claim,
the contractor seeks in excess of $100,000.  The contracting officer issued a decision denying
the claim, in part.  The claim lacked a certification; the claim did not contain a defective
certification.
With a reference to statute, 41 U.S.C. § 7103(b) (2012), and the case cited below, the
agency has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, because a proper claim (and contracting
officer’s decision) is lacking.  Included in its opposition to the motion, the contractor
provided a certification of its claim.  The contractor acknowledges that it did not provide a
formal certification with its claim.  In asking for the Board to deny the motion and resolve


CBCA 6491 2
its appeal, the contractor faults the contracting officer for not pointing out that the claim was
not certified and references the statutory provision that addresses a failure to certify or
defective certification.  A defective certification may be corrected prior to the entry of final
judgment; the statute makes no such correction available when no certification is provided. 
41 U.S.C. § 7103(b)(3); Greenbriar Valley Economic Development Corp. v. Department of
Veterans Affairs, CBCA 5897, 18-1 BCA ¶ 37,068.  The certification requirement rests on
the contractor; that the contracting officer failed to specify that a certification was lacking
does not create jurisdiction here.
Decision
The Board does not reach the merits of the appeal; instead, the appeal is DISMISSED
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
     Joseph A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
We concur:
    H. Chuck Kullberg            Kathleen J. O’Rourke     
H. CHUCK KULLBERG KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 7, 2016
CBCA 4744
BEVERLY DANIELS-SMITH,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Beverly Daniels-Smith, pro se, Silver Spring, MD.
Dennis J. Gallagher, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
The parties have filed a joint request for dismissal of this appeal, advising that
payment pursuant to their settlement agreement has been made.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED: April 7, 2011 
CBCA 2262 
WATERSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY AND
 
ENGINEERING, INC.,
 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Doug Belscher, Chief Operating Officer of Waterstone Environmental Hydrology and 
Engineering, Inc., Boulder, CO, appearing for Appellant. 
Michael D. Tully, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 29, 2010, Waterstone Environmental Hydrology and Engineering, Inc. 
filed an appeal with the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). In a telephone 
conference with the parties, the appellant agreed the appeal was more properly within the 
jurisdiction of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA). The CBCA 
transferred the appeal to the ASBCA, and that board docketed the appeal on March 9, 2011, 
as ASBCA 57557. 

 
       
                                               
  
 
2 CBCA 2262
 
Therefore, the above-captioned CBCA appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
_______________________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 21, 2011 
CBCA 2615 
COVENANT SECURITY SERVICES, LTD.,
                                                            Appellant, 
v.
 
THE JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS,
                                                            Respondent. 
James E. Mahoney of Griffith & Jacobson, LLC, Chicago, IL, counsel for Appellant. 
Maria Kersten, Office of General Counsel, The John F. Kennedy Center for the 
Performing Arts, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 12, 2011, the Board received a motion to dismiss from appellant, asking 
the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, as the parties have settled all matters in 
dispute. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 12, 2022
CBCA 7234
MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Meghan A. Douris of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Seattle, WA; and Alix K. Town of Oles
Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, Seattle, WA, counsel for Appellant.
Claire A. Watkins, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of appellant’s notice of voluntary dismissal, filed on April 11,
2022, in the above-referenced case.  Appellant states that respondent has agreed to payment
of the claim in full and requests that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 


CBCA 7234 2
In accordance with appellant’s request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: August 3, 2026
CBCA 8849
LAIMONAS ZUKAUSKAS,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Laimonas Zukauskas, pro se, Ellison Bay, WI.
Alexander Falciani, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 29, 2026, the parties requested that this appeal be dismissed without
prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 29, 2015
CBCA 3879
BRAD WEST & ASSOCIATES, INC., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WEST
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Traeger Machetanz of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, counsel for
Appellant.
Rayann L. Speakman, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 25, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this matter, advising the
Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
 HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: May 6, 2009 
CBCA 516, 1233 
CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
James F. Archibald, III of Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, Birmingham, AL, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Leonard E. Lucas III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS  (Chairman), BORWICK, and POLLACK . 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
These appeals involve construction claims filed by appellant, Caddell Construction 
Company, arising from its contract with respondent, General Services Administration (GSA), 
for the renovations to the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. Courthouse in Montgomery, Alabama. 
Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), the parties have submitted a joint settlement stipulation 
stipulating to the award of $650,000, inclusive of cost and attorney fees, with the provision 
that interest on the awarded amount under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 
(2006), “is to be computed from the [seventy-sixth] day following the date GSA submits its 
request for payment to the United States Department of [the] Treasury.”  The parties state 

     
  
    
 
    
         
_______________________________ 
_______________________________ ________________________________ 
2 CBCA 516, 1233 
that the parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and they 
will not appeal the decision. 
The Board adopts the parties’ stipulation by decision. Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), 
the Board’s decision is an adjudication on the merits.  
Decision 
These appeals are GRANTED IN PART  in the amount of $650,000, inclusive of 
attorney fees and costs plus allowable interest under the Contract Disputes Act to be 
computed from the seventy-sixth day following the date GSA submits its request for payment 
to the Department of the Treasury. Payment is to be made in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 
1304. 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 29, 2018
CBCA 5421
IVANTIS GROUP, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS, 
Respondent.
Isaias Alba IV of PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Richard J. Webber and Patrick R. Quigley of Arent Fox LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 26, 2018, appellant, with respondent’s consent, moved to dismiss this
appeal, advising the Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  The Board
commends the parties on their settlement, and consistent with the relief requested in
appellant’s motion, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 13, 2015
CBCA 4596, 4600
MARK G. ANDERSON CONSULTANTS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent in CBCA 4596,
and
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent in CBCA 4600.
Joseph J. Petrillo of Petrillo & Powell, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 4596.
Jack R. Cordes, Jr., Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 4600.

CBCA 4595, 4600 2
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER
Appellant has notified the Board that this matter, which was the subject of both
CBCA 4596 and CBCA 4600, has been settled.  Appellant moves to dismiss CBCA 4600
with prejudice.  Counsel for the Department of Justice consents to this motion.
Appellant also requests that CBCA 4596 be dismissed with prejudice, since the
settlement resolves the same claim with the General Services Administration.
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 28, 2013
CBCA 184
BLACKFEET COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Sam S. Painter and Majel M. Russell of Elk River Law Office, P.L.L.P, Billings, MT,
counsel for Appellant.
Sabrina A. McCarthy, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington,
DC, counsel for Respondent.
STEEL, Board Judge.
ORDER
Following mediation with the undersigned, counsel for appellant Blackfeet
Community College, with the concurrence of counsel for respondent, reports that the parties
have settled the subject matter of this appeal and requests that the Board dismiss this appeal
with prejudice. 

CBCA 184 2
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                         
CANDIDA S. STEEL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 28, 2024
CBCA 6979
DESBUILD EG MANAGEMENT SERVICES JV LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Lawrence M. Prosen and Benjamin L. Williams of Cozen O’Connor, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Kelly Y. Burnell and Justin S. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 28, 2024, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement
and requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 26, 2014
CBCA 4073
ATTENUATION ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Steven J. Koprince and Amanda M. Wilwert of Petefish, Immel, Heeb & Hird LLP,
Lawrence, KS, counsel for Appellant.
Michael L. Norris and Robin A. Baum, Office of the General Counsel, Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant has notified the Board that the parties have executed a settlement agreement 
and requests that this appeal be dismissed.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 5, 2007 
CBCA 812 
DUVALL-COULTER ASSOCIATES, INC., 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
Respondent. 
Laurence Schor and Susan L. Schor of McManus, Schor, Asmar & Darden, L.L.P., 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Charles K. Bucknor, Jr. and Dennis Adelson, Office of the Solicitor, Department of 
Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 11, 2007, the Board received notice of this appeal. Appellant cited the failure 
of the contracting officer to issue a final decision on its claim as the basis for its appeal.  The 
Government filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction on August 6, 2007. 
The Government asserted that appellant’s claim did not arise out of a contract, but rather, it 
was in the nature of a bid protest. On August 27, 2007, appellant filed a motion to withdraw 
this appeal and requested that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  

______________________ 
2 CBCA 812 
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.   
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 3, 2023
CBCA 7417
FIRST STRIKE ENVIRONMENTAL CO.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
John D. Ostrander of Elliott, Ostrander & Preston, P.C., Portland, OR, counsel for
Appellant.
Christina Parker and Kara M. Borden, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the
Interior, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised the Board that this appeal has been settled and requested a
dismissal with prejudice, without costs or attorney fees to any party.  Accordingly, the
captioned appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jerome M. Drummond    
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 13, 2013
CBCA 1114, 1755
CARMON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
John T. Flynn and Matthew A. Marrone of Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn &
Dial, LLC, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
James C. Caine, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, 
Department of Homeland Security, Glynco, GA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 13, 2008, and October 13, 2009, the Board received notices of appeal from
Carmon Construction Company (contractor) concerning its contract, LGL05C00005, with
the Department of Homeland Security (agency) for the renovation of building 681, Federal
Law Enforcement Taining Center, in Glynco, Georgia.  The contractor timely appealed two
decisions by the contracting officer denying its claims.  The parties engaged in discovery and
then utilized Board Judge Zischkau as a neutral.  The parties have resolved these disputes. 
In accordance with their request, the Board hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE these
appeals.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 29, 2013
CBCA 3387
CHENEGA TECHNOLOGY SERVICE CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
William K. Walker of Walker Reausaw, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Christian M. Butler, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 28, 2013, Chenega Technology Service Corporation appealed the deemed
denial of its certified claim under contract number HSBP1010C0023 by the Department of
Homeland Security.  On August 27, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this
appeal with prejudice, stating that they have fully settled the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 14, 2021
CBCA 6001
COLLECTO, INC. dba EOS CCA, 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
Joseph J. Petrillo of Smith Pachter McWhorter, PLC, Tysons Corner, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
Michael Taylor and Megan Nathan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Education, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 13, 2021, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice after having resolved all matters in the appeal.  Pursuant to CBCA Rule 12(b)(2)
(48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2019)), appellant’s motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 20, 2018
CBCA 5939
OLYMPIA DEVELOPMENT OF MICHIGAN,
     Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Respondent.
T. Joseph Seward and Michael T. Berger of Seward Peck & Henderson PLLC, Royal
Oak, MI, counsel for Appellant.
Brian F. Binney and Anna F. Kurtz, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Bureau
of Investigation, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties settled this matter and jointly request dismissal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Kyle Chadwick                  
     KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED:  June 5, 2013
CBCA 1841
RUIZ PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Jeffrey Weinstein of The Weinstein Law Group, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
William D. Robinson, Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Prisons entered into a requirements
contract with Ruiz Protective Services, Inc. (Ruiz) for the provision of guard services to
inmates held at two facilities in Texas, Federal Correctional Institution Fort Worth and
Federal Medical Center Carswell.  The bureau ordered considerably more hours of guard
services than originally contemplated, causing Ruiz to incur additional direct and indirect
costs for overtime and administrative matters.  Ruiz claimed that it was entitled to
$2,390,596.96 to cover its additional costs.  On December 22, 2009, Ruiz filed an appeal
with the Board from the deemed denial of its claim.

CBCA 1841 2
After protracted negotiations, the parties have agreed to settle the case, with the
Bureau of Prisons paying $589,471.88 to Ruiz.  Ruiz has filed a motion for dismissal of the
case.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
___________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 26, 2024
CBCA 6616, 7117
MSK CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Ryan L. Beaver, Matthew K. Lilly, and Maria Carisetti of Bradley Arant Boult
Cummings LLP, Charlotte, NC, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Kathleen Ellis, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent. 
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 25, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal, asking the Board
to dismiss the above-captioned appeals with prejudice.  Board Rule 12(b)(2) permits
dismissal of an appeal with prejudice upon appellant’s motion or the parties’ joint motion. 
48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2022).  The request is granted.  These appeals are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke    
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
_________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 2, 2011 
CBCA 2127 
SAMUEL A. RUBINO, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
 
Respondent. 
Samuel A. Rubino, pro se, Linn Creek, MO. 
Sarah G. Rapawy, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International 
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The appeal has been settled through alternative dispute resolution proceedings. 
Pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement, appellant has been paid fully, and the parties 
have submitted a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice. Accordingly, the appeal hereby is 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge
______________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 4, 2011 
CBCA 141 
PRECISION PINE & TIMBER, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Alan I. Saltman and Richard W. Goeken of Saltman & Stevens, P.C., Washington, 
DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Patricia Leigh Disert and Mary Ann Joca, Office of the General Counsel, Department 
of Agriculture, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 21, 1999, Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. (purchaser), filed a notice of appeal 
of a contracting officer’s assessment of $442,921.20 in default damages for failure to cut 
under the Salt Timber Sale contract, 005937. The claim arises under the purchaser’s contract 
with the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture. The board denied the purchaser’s 
motion for summary relief. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. , AGBCA 99-160-1, 00-2 BCA 
¶ 30,942. Following the submission of the appeal file, complaint, and answer, the parties 
engaged in discovery. Thereafter, they jointly requested and obtained sequential suspensions 
of proceedings, while awaiting the resolution of a court case involving disputes under the 
same contract. On October 4, 2011, the purchaser requested a dismissal. Accordingly, the 
Board grants the request. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 24, 2022
CBCA 7029
DANIELS BUILDING COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Bret S. Wacker of Clark Hill PLC, Detroit, MI; and Brian Lick and Jonathan
Christopher White of Clark Hill PLC, Lansing, MI, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 17, 2022, the Board received the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal. 
The parties have reached the terms of a settlement agreement and request that the Board
dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  The motion is granted and, pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)
(48 CFR 6101.12(b) (2020)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 7, 2014
CBCA 3042
VSE CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
Respondent.
Richard J. Webber of Arent Fox LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Jonathan D. Tepper and Holly H. Styles, Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue
Service, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On October 5, 2012, VSE Corporation timely filed a notice of appeal concerning its
contract, TOS-11-C-001, with the Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury
(agency).  Reaching the issue of entitlement on a Government claim, the Board granted the
agency’s motion for summary relief; quantum remained to be resolved.  VSE Corp. v.
Department of the Treasury, CBCA 3042, 14 BCA ¶ 35,476 (2013).  Having settled the
dispute, the parties request a dismissal with prejudice.
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
_______________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 5, 2022
CBCA 6538
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Paul E. Pompeo, Amanda J. Sherwood, and Sonia Tabriz, Arnold & Porter Kaye
Scholer LLP, Washington, DC; and Andrew K. Wible of Constellis, LLC, Reston, VA,
counsel for Appellant.
Randal W. Wax and Alexandra N. Wilson, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and
Acquisitions, Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 4, 2022, the Board received the parties’ joint motion to dismiss in the above-
referenced matter.  The parties state that they have executed a settlement agreement and, in
accordance with the terms of the agreement, request that the Board dismiss this appeal with
prejudice.  


CBCA 6538 2
This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 29, 2013
CBCA 2718
GTSI CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Joseph J. Petrillo of Petrillo & Powell, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Kathleen Oram, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The appellant, on March 26, 2013, represented that the parties had resolved the claim
by settlement and requested that the Board enter an order dismissing this appeal with
prejudice.  Accordingly, CBCA 2718 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: April 4, 2017
CBCA 5324, 5480
RAM-10 INDUSTRIAL, LLC, 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent.
Anthony H. Anikeeff and William A. Wozniak of Williams Mullen PC, Tysons
Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, DRUMMOND, and SULLIVAN.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve claims arising out of lease GS-V101-183R-518-
02-03 between RAM–10 Industrial, LLC (RAM) and the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).  The parties have now filed a joint motion for final judgment on stipulated settlement.
In the motion, they ask the Board to award RAM the sum of $215,396.53, to be paid from
the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  In addition, the parties
stipulate that in the event payment is not made within thirty days, interest shall accrue in
accordance with the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109, until payment is made to
RAM.  The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of or relief from a decision
which grants this sum, and that they will not appeal such decision.  

CBCA 5324, 5480 2
Decision
Accordingly, these appeals are GRANTED IN PART.  The VA shall pay to RAM 
$215,396.53 from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.  In the event
that payment is not made within thirty days, interest shall accrue in accordance with the
Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109, until the date of payment.
____________________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
We concur:
______________________________ _____________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 25, 2013
CBCA 1927, 2304
DYNAMIC CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Laurence Schor of Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Thomas D. Dinackus, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.
STEEL, Board Judge.
ORDER
Having reached a settlement in the above-captioned cases, the parties  have filed a
joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.  Accordingly, these appeals are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                            
CANDIDA S. STEEL
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE:  April 6, 2017
CBCA 1462
BRITTASHAN ENTERPRISES CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Carmardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Thomas D. Dinackus, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DRUMMOND, ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
This appeal is before us on an order to show cause why it should not be dismissed
with prejudice for appellant’s failure to prosecute.  For the reasons set forth below, appellant
has failed to prosecute the appeal, requiring us to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.
During the past twelve months, appellant’s counsel has been unable to obtain
cooperation from the corporate representative of Brittashan Enterprises Corporation, despite
diligent efforts by counsel.  The original corporate representative, at the time the appeal was
filed, is deceased.  In a number of status conference orders, the Board warned appellant that
if Brittashan’s successor corporate representative continued to fail to respond to appellant’s
counsel, the Board would have to issue a show cause order as to why the appeal should not


CBCA 1462 2
be dismissed for failure to prosecute.  Appellant’s counsel delivered copies of the Board’s
orders to Brittashan’s corporate representative.
On November 22, 2016, the Board held a status conference with counsel for the
parties.  Appellant’s counsel reported that despite his repeated efforts over a lengthy period
of time, he had been unable to find any corporate representative of Brittashan who was
willing to prosecute the appeal.   On that same day, the Board issued an order to show cause
why this appeal should not be dismissed for the failure of appellant to prosecute.  The Board
provided appellant until January 25, 2017, to respond to the order to show cause, and the
order stated that if appellant did not provide an adequate response to the show cause order,
the Board would dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  On or about December 9, 2016, the
corporate representative of Brittashan was served with the Board’s show cause order of
November 22, 2016.  Brittashan’s corporate representative has never responded to the
Board’s show cause order.
Under Board Rule 33(c) (48 CFR 6101.33(c) (2016)), the Board has the authority to
dismiss a case for failure to prosecute where a party has repeatedly failed to comply with the
Board’s orders.  Elite Quality Services, LLC v. Department of Commerce, CBCA 5050, 16-1
BCA ¶ 36,269; Medtek, Inc. v. Department of Veteran Affairs, CBCA 1544, 09-2 BCA ¶
34,285; see Kadin Corp. v. United States, 782 F.2d 175, 176 (Fed. Cir. 1986).  This is such
a situation.  Brittashan’s corporate representative has repeatedly refused to prosecute the
appeal.
Decision
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
We concur:
____________________________ ________________________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
______________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 10, 2011 
CBCA 2172 
VT HALTER MARINE, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 
Respondent. 
George D. Ruttinger, Richard W. Arnholt, and Jonathan M. Baker, of Crowell & 
Moring LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Mark Langstein, Fred Kopatich, Florence Bridges, and Ashley Powers, Office of 
General Counsel, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On October 1, 2010, the Board received from VT Halter Marine, Inc. (contractor) a 
timely-filed notice of appeal concerning its contract, DG 133E-04-CN-0036, with the 
Department of Commerce (Government), which the contracting officer terminated for 
default. The contractor maintains that the termination was improper, factually and legally 
unfounded, and should be nullified and converted to a termination for the convenience of the 
Government. On November 9, 2011, the Board received from the parties a request for a 
dismissal with prejudice, the parties having settled this dispute. The Board grants the 
request; the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 11, 2010 
CBCA 2013 
RICHARD ASSAM, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Richard Assam, pro se, Fortuna, CA. 
Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
GOODMAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On May 10, 2010, Richard Assam filed a notice of appeal in connection with a dispute 
under contract number AG-9A28-C-09-8915, for the use of two all terrain vehicles for fire 
line personnel.  On August 6, 2010, Mr. Assam advised the Board that the parties had 
reached a settlement and requested that the appeal be withdrawn with prejudice.  Respondent 
has no objection to the dismissal of the appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 17, 2021 
CBCA 6898
GUTIERREZ CANALES ENGINEERING, PC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
George H. King and Andrew J. Wenker of Lang & Klain, P.C., Scottsdale, AZ,
counsel for Appellant.
Ryan A. Black, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Salt Lake City, UT,
counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have resolved the dispute.  As sought in the joint motion, the Board
DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 17, 2011 
CBCA 2002 
3780 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
Adam S. Rossman, Los Angeles, CA, counsel for Appellant. 
Leigh Erin S. Izzo, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties have advised the undersigned that they have settled the appeal and, by 
joint motion, have asked the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, the 
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 19, 2013
CBCA 3215
HEARTHSTONE, INC.,
                                                               Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                                                                   Respondent.
Jason S. Randolph, Attorney at Law, Dandridge, TN, counsel for Appellant.
Jay McWhirter, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 23, 2013, Hearthstone, Inc. (Hearthstone) appealed from a contracting
officer’s final decision terminating its timber sale contract with respondent, the Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, and assessing damages against Hearthstone.  The parties
subsequently executed a settlement agreement, under which they fully resolved their
differences, and, on September 18, 2013, jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
_____________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 16, 2013
CBCA 3065
MKB CONSTRUCTORS, A JOINT VENTURE,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Mark Jensen, Partner of MKB Constructors, Kirkland, WA, appearing for Appellant.
William H. Butterfield, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On November 2, 2012, the Board received a notice of appeal from MKB Constructors,
a Joint Venture, concerning its contract, HSCG50-11-C-PJT049, with the Department of
Homeland Security, Coast Guard.  The contracting officer had denied the contractor’s
certified claim for additional compensation relating to cargo wharf repair in Kodiak, Alaska. 
The parties resolved this dispute through informal means, informing the Board on
January 15, 2013, that a full and final settlement has occurred.  According to the request of
the parties, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  January 17, 2017
CBCA 5441
INTEGRATED CONCEPTS AND RESEARCH CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Kurt J. Hamrock and Raymond B. Biagini of Covington & Burling LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Bernard J. McShane and Evan Wisser, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime
Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, O’ROURKE, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation timely appealed from the deemed
denial of a certified claim for $10,060,746.63.  Its complaint increased the amount of the
claim to $10,456,608.  The parties subsequently filed a joint motion complying with
Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2015)) for a stipulated award of $10,400,000,
“inclusive of all interest” if payment is timely made.  The Department of Transportation
states that it intends to pay $4,168,298 of this amount from available agency funds and to
submit the remainder, $6,231,702, for payment from the permanent indefinite judgment
fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  
We grant the motion.


CBCA 5441          2
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  The appellant is awarded $10,400,000,
without statutory interest, except that, as stipulated, interest under 41 U.S.C. § 7109(a)(1)
shall begin to run on the sum of $6,231,702 on March 24, 2017.
____________________________
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
___________________________ ____________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge Board Judge
______________________ 
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 13, 2009 
CBCA 1444 
QWEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Gregory  A. Smith and Christo pher J . Kimball of Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, 
Reston, VA, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael  Tully, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Atlanta, 
GA;  and Nathan C. Guerrero, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, counsel for
 
Respondent.
 
KULLBERG , Board Judge.
 
ORDER 
On December 23, 2008, appellant requested with  the Government’s concurrence that 
this appeal be dismissed without prejudice.  Pursuant to Rule 12(d),  this appeal is 
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 29, 2021
CBCA 6843
REAGENT WORLD, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Bryan B. Arnold of Gordee, Nowicki & Blakeney LLP, Irvine, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
John J. Hockberger, Jr. and Dusty D. Parson, Office of the Solicitor, Department of
the Interior, Boise, ID, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 24, 2021, appellant advised the Board that the parties have settled the issues
in this appeal and requested that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  We grant the
request, and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 2, 2021
CBCA 6884
GC WORKS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Bryant S. Banes, Sean D. Forbes, and Sarah P. Harris of Neel, Hooper & Banes, P.C.,
Houston, TX, counsel for Appellant.
Cassandra A. Walbert, Office of Procurement Law, United States Coast Guard,
Department of Homeland Security, Norfolk, VA, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On July 29, 2021, the parties filed a joint request to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
after having settled all matters.  The parties’ request is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    Erica S. Beardsley    
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 3, 2009 
CBCA 582, 1195 
CHARLES ENGINEERING CO., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
J. Michael Littlejohn and Pavan I. Khoobchandani of Akerman Senterfitt Wickwire 
Gavin, Vienna, VA, counsel for Appellant. 
Tracy Downing, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Augusta, GA; and Charlma J. Quarles and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General 
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN,  Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 26, 2009, the parties forwarded to the Board a joint motion requesting that 
the Board dismiss the above-captioned appeals with prejudice pursuant to the terms of their 
settlement agreement dated January 13, 2009.  The parties requested that the Board’s order 
state the following:  “As part of the settlement agreement between the parties, the 
[Department of Veterans Affairs] has agreed to change the past performance evaluation to 
reflect a SATISFACTORY rating.” 

______________________________ 
 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge