Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 16, 2025
CBCA 7368, 7369
BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Todd A. Jones, Peyton D. Mansure, and Lindsey E. Powell of Anderson Jones, PLLC,
Raleigh, NC, counsel for Appellant.
Justin S. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 13, 2025, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement and
requested that these appeals be dismissed.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED: February 1, 2016
CBCA 4453
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
M. Katherine Stroker, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
This appeal was filed against the wrong federal agency,  the Agency for International
Development (USAID), rather than against the agency with whom appellant, Xerox
Corporation, had its contract, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  In this
regard, we note that the claim that is the subject of the appeal in fact had been addressed to
an HHS contracting officer.  Appellant has filed a request for a voluntary dismissal of the
instant appeal, and states that it intends to file a substitute appeal against HHS.  Since it was
not lodged against the proper respondent, the instant appeal is DISMISSED. 
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 1, 2009 
CBCA 948 
CIRCLE, INC., 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Eric A. Kracht and John M. Madison, III, of Kracht & Frazier, LLP, Baton Rouge, 
LA, counsel for Appellant. 
Marilyn J. Brown, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Little Rock, AR, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On October 29, 2007, Circle, Inc. filed a notice of appeal in connection with a dispute 
under contract number 50-7217-03-14, for the construction of a concrete-lined channel in 
Bayou Yarbor, city of Opelousas, St. Landry Parish, Louisiana.  On March 23, 2009, the 
parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice, stating that the appeal has been settled. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 1, 2010 
CBCA 1651 
LIVS ASSOCIATES, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
William S. Daskam, IV of Butler Pappas, Tampa, FL, counsel for Appellant. 
Azine Farzami, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 17, 2010, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the subject appeal, 
stating that the matter has been settled, with each party bearing its own costs, attorney fees, 
and expenses.  
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
___________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED: March 12, 2012 
CBCA 2490 
RP 1600 LAMAR, LP, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
J. Chris Haile of Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 11, 2011, RP 1600 Lamar, LP appealed the final decision of a General 
Services Administration contracting officer denying appellant’s claim for compensation 
under lease number GS-07B-16642 relating to the 1600 Lamar Building in Arlington, Texas. 
On March 12, 2012, appellant filed a request for dismissal, stating that the parties 
have executed a settlement agreement and lease modification resolving all of the disputes in 
this appeal and requesting that this appeal be dismissed. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED . 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 29, 2016
CBCA 3632
URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Daniel R. Frost of Snell & Wilmer LLP, Denver, CO, counsel for Appellant.
Brady L. Jones, III, Office of Chief Counsel, Department of Energy, Cincinnati, OH,
counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have notified the Board that they have executed a settlement agreement
and request that this matter be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 22, 2012 
CBCA 2769 
PALMER FEDERAL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
 
Respondent. 
David Himelfarb of McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA, counsel for Appellant. 
Colin W. O’Sullivan and David R. Koeppel, Office of the Solicitor, Department of 
Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On September 25, 2012, the parties reached a settlement in this appeal. The parties 
have now filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Due to Settlement.” In this motion the parties 
have asked the Board for an order to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, each party to bear its 
own costs and attorney fees. The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE , each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
_________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 9 , 2008 
CBCA 795 
XEROX CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Richard D. Lieberman of McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, PC, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN,  Board Judge. 
Subsequent to the filing of this appeal, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations 
resulting in a resolution of all issues before the Board.  Appellant moves to dismiss  the 
appeal with prejudice.  Respondent concurs.  The motion is granted. 
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED: January 5, 2017
CBCA 5577 
U S TRUST CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Faris W. McMullin, President of U S Trust Construction, LLC, Meridian, ID,
appearing for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of the appellant’s motion, filed on January 4, 2017, to
withdraw the above-referenced matter.  The appellant indicates that a settlement was reached
and requests that the Board dismiss the appeal.
In accordance with the appellant’s request, this appeal is DISMISSED.  
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 16, 2014
CBCA 2786, 3250
ARQUITECTONICA INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Joseph W. Downs III, Jordan C. Kay, and Justin S. Miller of Daniels, Kashtan,
Downs, Robertson & McGirney, P.A., Coral Gables, FL; and John E. Oramas, Oramas &
Associates, Key Biscayne, FL, counsel for Appellant.
Dalton F. Phillips, Catherine Crow, and Claire L. O’Donnell, Office of the General
Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 7, 2014, appellant Arquitectonica International Corp. and respondent
General Services Administration (GSA) entered into a settlement agreement that provided,
“[U]pon the full execution of this Agreement by the Parties, GSA shall dismiss its claims
against the Design Parties [Arquitectonica] with prejudice.”  GSA moves to dismiss with
prejudice the above-captioned appeals, noting that it has consulted with Arquitectonica and
confirmed that appellant has no objection to the dismissal.  Accordingly, these appeals are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
GRANTED AS TO INTEREST ACCRUAL DATES: April 20, 2022
CBCA 5826, 6861, 6897, 7049
CTA I, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
John M. Manfredonia of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC, Cresskill, NJ; William
E. Dorris of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA; and Brian G. Walsh and
Jennifer Eve Retener of Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Harold W. Askins, III, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Charleston, SC, and Tyler W. Brown, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
The Board’s decision awarding termination for convenience costs in this case reserved
the issue of the accrual of interest under 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2018) for further proceedings. 
After supplemental briefing, we agree with the appellant that its “equitable adjustment
claim[s]” were “not extinguished by the government’s termination for convenience,”
American Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Babbitt, No. 98-1466, 1999 WL 508318, at *3 (Fed. Cir.
July 14, 1999) (citing James M. Ellett Construction Co. v. United States, 93 F.3d 1537, 1546
(Fed. Cir. 1996)), and that interest on the equitable adjustments of the contract price runs
from the date that the appellant submitted the certified equitable adjustment claim underlying


CBCA 5826, 6861, 6897, 7049 2
CBCA 6861, while interest on the remainder of the award runs from the date that the
appellant certified the termination costs claim.
Decision
The appeals are GRANTED as to interest accrual dates.  Of the $1,465,664.10
awarded, statutory interest shall accrue on the equitable adjustment amount of $414,883.40
from January 25, 2020, until the payment date and shall accrue on the remaining
$1,050,780.70 from January 27, 2020, until the payment date.
   Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
   Allan H. Goodman            H. Chuck Kullberg            
ALLAN H. GOODMAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 6, 2024
CBCA 8134
BROOKRING FEDERAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
John R. Dietrick of The Law Offices of John R. Dietrick, PA, Topeka, KS, counsel
for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bend,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On November 5, 2024, appellant filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal with
prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)).  Accordingly, the
motion is granted, and the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Erica S. Beardsley    
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 11, 2025
CBCA 8089, 8153
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Vivian Katsantonis and Christopher M. Harris of Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald,
L.L.P., McLean, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Marc E. Mandel, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 7, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these appeals with
prejudice  pursuant to a settlement agreement executed on November 18, 2024.  Accordingly,
these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Patricia J. Sheridan      
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 4, 2019
CBCA 6544
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Randal W. Wax, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department
of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 2, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion requesting dismissal of this
appeal with prejudice.  In accordance with Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(2019)), this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own
costs, fees (including attorney fees), and expenses.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED:  August 21, 2014
CBCA 3825
R.A. GLANCY & SONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
James R. Mall of Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, counsel for
Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 22, 2014, the Board docketed an appeal from R.A. Glancy & Sons, Inc.
(Glancy) regarding a dispute as to work at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical
Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  The matter was docketed as CBCA 3825.  An initial
review indicated that there had not been a demand for or a final decision issued by the
contracting officer (CO) as to the disputed matter.  The parties and Board conferred and as
a result concluded that Glancy would proceed to seek a final decision from the CO, and the
VA would then move to timely issue a final decision.  Once the final decision was issued,
appellant would elect whether to appeal or not, and if it chose to appeal, decide at what
forum.  Dismissal of CBCA 3825 was agreed to be held in abeyance until such time as a
proper appeal on the matter was filed.


CBCA 3825 2
On August 11, 2014, Glancy filed a timely appeal from a decision of the CO dated
July 31, 2014.  That decision, which covers the same issues as CBCA 3825, was docketed
as CBCA 4060.  Accordingly and in accord with the earlier agreements, the appeal in CBCA
3825 is DISMISSED.
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: June 27, 2016
CBCA 3823, 3824, 4007, 4515, 4516, 4834, 4835, 4919
COBURN CONTRACTORS,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
J. Lister Hubbard of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, AL, counsel for Appellant.
Stephen F. Butera, Office of the Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Clarksburg, WV, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, SHERIDAN, and ZISCHKAU.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Coburn Contractors (contractor) filed eight notices of appeal concerning a project
order, 540-CSI-201, under contract VA244-12-C-0175 with the Department of Veterans
Affairs (agency).  The contract involved the planning, scheduling, and construction of the
community center at Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Clarksburg, West Virginia.  The
parties resolved the disputes, involving matters of time and money, through mediation with
Board Judge Lester.  On June 27, 2016, the Board received from the parties a stipulated (or
consent) judgment.  The Government shall pay the contractor $442,665.69.  If payment is
made without use of the judgment fund, interest under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C.
§ 7109 (2012), would accrue from the ninety-first day after the date of this decision until
paid.  If payment is made with the judgment fund, interest would accrue from the ninety-first
day after the contractor provides the agency with necessary information to initiate that
payment process until paid.  The parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from the
Board’s decision, and will not appeal the decision.  The parties note that the Government
may utilize the permanent indefinite judgment fund.  31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 7108.


CBCA 3823, 3824, 4007, 4515, 4516, 4834, 4835, 4919 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART these appeals.  The contractor is to receive 
$442,665.69, plus applicable interest under the Contract Disputes Act, if any, as detailed
above.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
We concur:
_____________________________ ______________________________
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
GRANTED:  July 7, 2025
CBCA 8313
CADDELL CONSTRUCTION (DE), LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Jonathan R. Mayo and Randi N. Thompson of Smith Currie Oles LLP, Atlanta, GA,
counsel for Appellant.
Raul Chiriboga, Office of Chief Counsel, Customs and Border Protection, Department
of Homeland Security, Washington, DC; and Kimberly L. Cohen, Office of Chief Counsel,
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Indianapolis, IN, counsel
for Respondent.
Before Board Judges LESTER, SHERIDAN, and NEWSOM. 
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
On June 18, 2025, appellant, Caddell Construction (DE), LLC, and respondent, the
Department of Homeland Security, filed a joint motion requesting the entry of a stipulated
judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $5,814,179.55, plus interest, as authorized
by the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2018), accruing from August 23,
2024.  The settlement amount includes all costs and fees set forth in the settlement agreement
between the parties and fully resolves the dispute underlying this appeal.  The parties have
stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board’s


CBCA 8313 2
entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to appellant.  See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR
6101.25(b) (2024)).
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED.  Respondent shall pay $5,814,179.55 to appellant in full
settlement of this appeal with CDA interest accruing from August 23, 2024, until the date of
payment.  Caddell waives any further rights it may have to claim for recovery of attorney
fees, costs, and expenses that it may have incurred in conjunction with this appeal.
    Patricia J. Sheridan      
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.           Elizabeth W. Newsom      
HAROLD D. LESTER. Jr.  ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM
Board Judge Board Judge
.
__________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 18, 2007 
CBCA 659 
PACIFIC AEROMOTIVE CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Jack Allaband, Office Manager of Pacific Aeromotive Corporation, Erie, CO, 
appearing for Appellant. 
Judith A. Bonner, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties have advised the Board that the issues in this appeal have been settled, 
and move that it be dismissed with prejudice. 
Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 28, 2023
CBCA 7063, 7137
H2O CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
William B. Westcott, T. Josh Judd, and Adam L. Robertson of Andrews Myers, P.C.,
Houston, TX; and Paul H. Sanderford of Sanderford & Carroll, P.C., Belton, TX, counsel for
Appellant.
Jack F. Gilbert and Kristina Lea Porzio, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised that these appeals have been settled and have requested
dismissal with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: April 2, 2013
CBCA 3274
WILSON 5 SERVICE COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
James Woodman, General Manager of Wilson 5 Service Company, Inc., Kittery, ME,
appearing for Appellant.
Scott F. McCleary, Office of Regional Counsel, General Service Administration,
Chicago, IL, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 20, 2013, appellant moved for dismissal of this appeal, representing that
the parties had entered into a settlement agreement where respondent agreed to pay and
appellant agreed to accept the sum of $2563.20 to settle the claim associated with the above-
captioned appeal under contract GSP0511SI0085.  Accordingly, CBCA 3274 is
DISMISSED.
______________________
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 27, 2026
CBCA 8451
YALE CREEK, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Matthew T. Schoonover, Matthew P. Moriarty, John M. Mattox II, Ian P. Patterson,
Timothy J. Laughlin, and Haley M. Sirokman of Schoonover & Moriarty LLC, Olathe, KS,
counsel for Appellant.
Rayann L. Speakman, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 26, 2026, the parties jointly filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, representing that they have executed a settlement agreement.  In accordance with
the parties’ request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  July 16, 2025
CBCA 8466
FAITH ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, 
Petitioner,
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Shaun C. Kennedy, Thomas A. Morales, and Wiley G. Cason of Holland & Hart LLP,
Denver, CO, counsel for Petitioner.
Kathleen Ramos, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Batavia, NY, counsel for Respondent.
KANG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 11, 2025, the parties jointly moved to dismiss appellant’s petition.  The parties
advise that they “agreed to extend Respondent’s deadline to issue a [contracting officer’s
final decision] to September 30, 2025.”  The parties accordingly have requested dismissal
without prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024)). 


CBCA 8466 2
The petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
    Jonathan L.  Kang       
JONATHAN L.  KANG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 1, 2021
CBCA 6927
PROFESSIONAL PROJECT SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Richard W. Arnholt and Sylvia Yi of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
William Mayers and JiSan A. López, Office of the General Counsel, National Nuclear
Security Administration, Department of Energy, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 28, 2021, appellant requested that this appeal be dismissed with
prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 7, 2017
CBCA 5582
PARAMOUNT II, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
John T. Bender of McFadden, Rouse & Bender, L.L.C., Mobile, AL, counsel for
Appellant.
Gregory Swartzberg, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The lessor, Paramount II, LLC, under contract GS-04B-LAL60473, disputes the
determinations by the agency, the General Services Administration, to reduce the square
footage of leased space and to reserve its right to assess reprocurement or other excess costs. 
The parties having resolved the dispute, in accordance with a joint request, the Board
DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this case.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 13, 2007 
CBCA 441 
2COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE  INC.,
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Pat D. Dixon, Jr., General Counsel of Computer Intelligence 2  Inc., Marietta, GA, 
counsel for Appellant. 
George U. Lane, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
2Computer Intelligence  Inc. claimed that it was entitled to $2,152,630.03 more than
it had been paid under a task order issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) for 
the provision of telecommunications support services.  A GSA contracting officer denied the 
claim.  The contractor appealed this decision and later increased the amount of its claim to 
$3,289,026.40. 
The parties engaged in extensive settlement negotiations, as a result of which they 
have agreed to resolve their dispute. Under their settlement agreement, GSA will pay to the 
appellant the sum of $2,600,000. 

    
_________________________ 
2 CBCA 441 
The parties have asked that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.  The Board grants 
the request.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED: June 23, 2014
CBCA 3758
TRIPARTITE JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN G4S SECURITY SERVICES INC.
(N/K/A G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (PUERTO RICO), LTD.); 
WACKENHUT INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
(N/K/A G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.);
AND G4S SECURITY SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Eduardo F. Rodriguez of Avila Rodriguez Hernandez Mena & Ferri LLP, Coral
Gables, FL, counsel for Appellant.
John W. Cox, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department
of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have settled this appeal and request that it be dismissed.  Accordingly, this
appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
_____________________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 18, 2025
CBCA 8346
REAGENT WORLD, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Bryan B. Arnold of Gordee, Nowicki & Blakeney LLP, Irvine, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
Karen Glasgow, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, San Francisco,
CA, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 7, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion stating that they have settled this
appeal and requesting that it be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12 (48 CFR
6101.12(b)(2) (2024)).  The parties’ motion is granted.  Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell          
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: January 14, 2016
CBCA 3422
HOMELAND SECURITY CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Victor G. Klingelhofer and Andrew K.Wible of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Ricarto Brazela, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, KULLBERG, and WALTERS.
WALTERS, Board Judge.  
On January 13, 2016, the parties submitted a joint motion on a stipulated judgment,
pursuant to the terms of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR)  settlement agreement under
which they settled fully the above appeal and any and all other remaining claims under or
related to the contract that is the subject of the appeal, contract no. VA-245-C-0514,
involving renovation at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center,
Washington, D.C.  As part of their settlement agreement and their joint motion, they
stipulated to an award by this Board in favor of appellant, Homeland Security Construction
Corp. (HSCC), in the amount of $3,225,000, with the understandings: (1) that payment of
that judgment amount would be made by the Treasury Department on behalf of respondent,


CBCA 3422 2
the VA, from the permanent indefinite judgment fund; (2) that, if payment is not received
by HSCC on or before April 15, 2016, interest on the judgment amount will accrue
thereafter at the rate(s) prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of the
Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012) (CDA); and (3) that payment of any
such accrued CDA interest will be made together with the judgment amount.  
Under their joint motion, the parties state that they will not seek review,
reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and will not appeal the decision.  In
addition, under the settlement agreement and joint motion, appellant has waived any right
it may have to interest (other than the aforesaid CDA interest) or to seek recovery of attorney
fees and expenses.
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  In accordance with the parties’ joint motion,
the Board awards appellant, HSCC, the stipulated settlement amount of $3,225,000.  Rule
25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2014)).  Payment of that amount is to be made as described above
from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304, together with any CDA
interest that may accrue on that amount, if payment is not received by HSCC by April 15,
2016.
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
We concur:
____________________________ __________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED:  October 22, 2007 
CBCA 785 
THOMSON RADIO BROADCAST, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, 
Respondent. 
Steven J. Kmieciak and Amanda Weiner of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Jan S. McNutt, Office of General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
PARKER , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On June 7, 2007, Thomson Radio Broadcast, Inc. (Thomson) appealed the final 
decision of a Broadcasting Board of Governors contracting officer denying Thomson’s 
claims under contract number BBGCON3602C5271 for construction of the Kuwait 
shortwave expansion project.  On October 19, 2007, the parties filed a joint stipulation of 
dismissal with prejudice, stating that the parties have executed a settlement agreement. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED . 
ROBERT W. PARKER 
Board Judge
________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 8, 2009 
CBCA 1046 
GOLDBELT EAGLE, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Michael L. Sterling of Vandeventer Black LLP, Norfolk, VA, counsel for Appellant. 
James L. Weiner and Emily E. Parkhurst, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the 
Interior, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 7, 2009, appellant requested that the Board dismiss this appeal with 
prejudice upon the ground that it has been settled.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED 
WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 11, 2024
CBCA 6899, 7059, 7822
PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Stephen J. McBrady, Robert J. Sneckenberg, Tyler A. O’Connor, Michelle D.
Coleman, and Eric K. Herendeen of Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Lucy M. Knowles, John J. Murphy III, Thomas F. England, Bernice M. Jenkins, and
Jennifer Farmer, Office of Chief Counsel, Department of Energy, Aiken, SC, counsel for
Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 9, 2024, appellant filed a request, with the concurrence of respondent,
to dismiss the captioned appeals in light of the parties’ settlement of their disputes.  The
Board commends the parties on the successful resolution of these appeals.  Accordingly, the
appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 31, 2021
CBCA 6161
WSSA BIRMINGHAM, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Diana Parks Curran and Hadeel N. Masseoud of Curran Legal Services Group, Inc.,
Johns Creek, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Jay Bernstein and Alexander C. Vincent, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 30, 2021, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 
The parties have negotiated a settlement of the underlying dispute and agreed that each party
will bear its own attorney fees and costs.  
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan          
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 6, 2025
CBCA 8223, 8398
APTIM-NORTH WIND CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Timothy E. Heffernan, Robert G. Barbour, and C. William Groscup of Watt, Tieder,
Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP, McLean, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Wendy E. Bryant and Kristopher D. Muse, Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
By joint motion dated September 29, 2025, the parties sought dismissal of the appeals
with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024)).  The appeals are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Marian E. Sullivan         
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: June 9, 2015
CBCA 4655
HAWK CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC,
Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Thomas R. Krider and Alix K. Schroeder of Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP,
Seattle, WA, counsel for Petitioner.
Brian R. Reed, Kristin Langwell, Lisa Yee, and Brent Pope, Chicago Office of
Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, IL, counsel for Respondent. 
LESTER, Board Judge.
Petitioner has notified the Board that it wishes to withdraw its request for the Board
to direct the respondent, Department of Veterans Affairs, to issue a contracting officer’s
decision in reference to petitioner’s claim in the above-captioned case.  Accordingly, this
petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 8, 2015
CBCA 5047
CHINY-GS JV, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Tony Chinye, President, Chiny-GS JV, LLC, Pembroke Pines, FL, appearing for
Appellant.
Keaton Norquist, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant, Chiny-GS JV, LLC, has requested that its appeal be withdrawn, stating that
it no longer wishes to pursue the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. 
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: May 19, 2011 
CBCA 1382 
CAMRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Carlos G. Rivera, CEO, and Ryan Leisinger, Contracts Administrator, of CAMRIS 
International, Inc., Bethesda, MD, appearing for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges VERGILIO , POLLACK , and STEEL . 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
On October 21, 2008, the Board received a notice of appeal from CAMRIS 
International, Inc. (contractor) concerning its contract, K1102BJ4119, with the General 
Services Administration (agency). The agency placed a purchase order (11CAB572016-01) 
under the contract on behalf of the Air Force. The contractor here disputes a contracting 
officer’s decision denying its claim of improper termination and breach of the contract. In 
particular, the contractor maintains that the Government improperly terminated its 
performance and breached the contract by diverting work to a company owned, in-part, by 
the Air Force’s contracting officer’s technical representative overseeing the work. In its 
claim, the contractor sought to recover a total of $1,741,275; in its complaint, the amount is 
reduced. Following the submission of the appeal file, complaint, and answer, the parties and 
personnel from the Air Force engaged in discovery and settlement discussions. On May 17, 
2011, the Board received from the parties a motion for a stipulated judgment. 

 
            
           
           
               
              
                
               
               
            
           
              
            
______________________________ 
  
 
 
_____________________________ ______________________________ 
    
  
2 CBCA 1382 
The parties have resolved the dispute, agreeing upon a stipulated judgment. The 
Government shall pay the contractor $350,000, with applicable interest under the Contract 
Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 611 (2006) (now codified at 41 U.S.C. § 7109), to begin running 
on the thirty-first day after May 17, 2011. The amount fully satisfies the contractor’s claim; 
the contractor agrees to waive any attorney fees, costs, or expenses (pursuant to the Equal 
Access to Justice Act or any other legal authority) that might otherwise be owed. The parties 
will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and will not appeal the 
decision. The parties note that the Government shall utilize the judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. 
§ 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 612 (now codified at 41 U.S.C. § 7108). 
Decision 
Accordingly, the Board adopts the terms of the settlement agreement and hereby 
GRANTS IN PART the appeal, such that the contractor is to receive $350,000, plus interest 
to begin accruing on June 17, 2011, if payment is not made earlier. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
HOWARD A. POLLACK CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 13, 2011 
CBCA 1494 
KEENAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.,
 
THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, AND THE
 
COLLEGE PARK BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Richard J. Conway and Tina D. Reynolds of Dickstein Shapiro, LLP, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellants, Keenan Development Associates Inc., The City of College Park, and the 
College Park Industrial Business Industrial Development Authority, have filed a request for 
a voluntary dismissal of the appeal. 

 
      
                                                
  
 
2 CBCA 1494
 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART: January 21, 2009 
CBCA 717 
CADDELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Arlan D. Lewis of Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, Birmingham, AL, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Catherine Crow, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges STERN , BORWICK, and WALTERS. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
The instant appeal was from a contracting officer’s decision regarding a claim 
submitted by the appellant, Caddell Construction Company, Inc. (Caddell), to respondent, 
the General Services Administration (GSA), for $15,009,889, on behalf of itself and its 
various subcontractors, relating to a contract between the parties under contract no. 
GS06P02GZC0546 for the renovation of the Edward Zorinsky Federal Building in Omaha, 
Nebraska (the contract).  Subsequent to the Board docketing the appeal, Caddell revised its 
total overall claim amount downward to $12,048,984. Of this revised total, Caddell sought, 
by way of a pass-through claim, the amount of $2,860,081 on behalf of one of its 
subcontractors, Faith Technologies, Inc., d/b/a SKC Electric (SKCE).  

    
 
 
   
  
   
 
_______________________________ 
_________________________________ _______________________________ 
2 CBCA 717 
Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the parties have submitted a joint motion for 
stipulated partial award and partial dismissal with prejudice, under which they seek a partial 
award in Caddell’s favor for SKCE and for Caddell’s markups in connection with the SKCE 
pass-through claim in the total amount of $1,241,617.99, inclusive of costs, attorney fees, 
and interest, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 
(2000), and a partial dismissal with prejudice of the remainder of the SKCE pass-through 
claim, including related Caddell markups.  The joint motion states, pursuant to the Board’s 
Rules of Procedure, that neither party will seek reconsideration of or relief from the Board’s 
decision or appeal the Board’s decision related to the motion. See Rule 25(b) (to be codified 
at 48 CFR 6101.25(b)). 
Decision 
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the parties’ 
joint motion, the Board awards Caddell, for SKCE and for its own markups, the sum of 
$1,241,617.99 for the SKCE pass-through claim, inclusive of costs, attorney fees, and 
interest, said sum to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304. 
In accordance with the parties’ explicit request, the remainder of the SKCE pass-through 
claim, including Caddell markups, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
JAMES L. STERN ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 25, 2018
CBCA 6254
JOE FOSS ENTERPRISE,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Gerard Foss, Owner of Joe Foss Enterprise, Battle Creek, MI, appearing for
Appellant.
Michael D. Tully, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 21, 2018, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.
Accordingly, appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Beverly M. Russell
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 30, 2020
CBCA 6424
CGI FEDERAL INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Karen L. Manos and Erin M. Rankin of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Seeta Rebbapragada, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and
Human Services, Washington, DC; and Douglas Kornreich, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 28, 2020, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
after having settled their dispute. The parties’ motion is granted. This appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Erica S. Beardsley
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 23, 2008 
CBCA 1251, 1252 
VADOR VENTURES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Richard D. Lieberman and Lisa Marie Golden of McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, 
P.C., Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Leigh Erin S. Izzo, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant, Vador Ventures, Inc., appealed the deemed denial of its claims for elevator 
wage increases (CBCA 1251) and engineering wage increases (CBCA 1252) submitted under 
contract GS-11P-99-YQD-0033.  
On December 18, 2008, the parties submitted a joint motion to dismiss these appeals 
with prejudice, stating that the appeals have been resolved by mutual agreement of the 
parties. 

                                                             
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 16, 2022
CBCA 7114
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
David B. Robbins and Scott E. Whitman of Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Tami S. Hagberg and Terrius D. Greene, Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have resolved the dispute.  Regarding the work of Board Judge Chadwick,
the parties specify that the alternative dispute resolution services were instrumental in
permitting the parties to reach a mutally acceptable settlement.  As requested by the parties,
the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the appeal.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 5, 2013
CBCA 3125
A BAR S PROPERTIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Lars Johnson of Lars Johnson & Associates, LLC, Eagle, CO, counsel for Appellant.
Claire L. O’Donnell and Lesley M. Busch, Office of General Counsel, General
Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORD3ER
On August 2, 2013, the appellant filed an amended motion to dismiss the appeal with
prejudice, with no objection from the respondent.  Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal
WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own attorney fees, costs, and expenses.
_________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  June 23, 2026
CBCA 8876
PITNEY BOWES INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
William A. Shook of The Law Offices of William A. Shook PLLC, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Laetitia C. Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 18, 2026, appellant submitted a motion to dismiss this appeal without
prejudice, stating that the parties have identified additional facts and documents not
previously subject to a contracting officer’s final decision, which may impact the resolution
of the underlying issues.  In the motion, appellant also states that the parties are working
together in a good faith effort to resolve these issues without further Board intervention. 
Respondent has no objection to this dismissal.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
    Patricia J. Sheridan      
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: January 25, 2018
CBCA 5270
C. OVERAA & CO.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joshua Genser, General Counsel of C. Overaa & Co., Richmond, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, KULLBERG, and LESTER.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
On January 16, 2018, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for judgment
on a stipulated settlement.  The parties requested that the Board enter judgment in the amount
of $100,000, with payment to be made through the judgment fund in accordance with
31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012) and 41 U.S.C. § 7108.  Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b)
(2015)).  The parties have agreed that they will not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or
relief from, the Board’s decision, and that each party will be responsible for its costs, attorney
fees, and expenses incurred in the litigation of this appeal.  


CBCA 5270 2
The parties’ settlement agreement also stipulated that the $100,000 judgment does not
include the following two undisputed amounts: added cut detector and heat detector,
$6398.27; and telephone lines for elevator controllers, $3835.27.  Those amounts will be paid
separately according to the parties’ settlement agreement.
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART the appeal.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
motion, the Board awards appellant the stipulated settlement amount of $100,000.
Rule 25(b).
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
We concur:
_______________________ _______________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge Board Judge
____________________________  
                           
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 12, 2011 
CBCA 2389 
TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 
Respondent. 
Jess Fitzhugh, President of Tidewater Contractors, Inc., Brookings, OR, appearing 
for Appellant. 
Timothy J. Binder, Division Counsel, Western Federal Lands Highway Division, 
Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA,
 
counsel for Respondent.
 
BORWICK , Board Judge.
 
ORDER 
On September 7, 2011, the Board received a motion to dismiss the appeal in 
accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement. Pursuant to the agreement of the 
parties, and Rule 12(c), this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 

 
                           
2 CBCA 2389 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 11, 2019
CBCA 6105, 6106, 6107, 6320
KCORP TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Johnathan M. Bailey and Hector M. Benavides of Bailey & Bailey, P.C., San Antonio,
TX, counsel for Appellant.
Alexander C. Vincent, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge
ORDER
On July 8, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these appeals with
prejudice, indicating that they have settled all claims in each of the appeals.  The parties’
motion is granted.  These appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge