DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: December 13, 2016 
CBCA 5534
AGBAYANI CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Respondent.
Michael J. Gardner of Troutman Sanders, LLP, Virginia Beach, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
James Rhodes and Lauren Didiuk, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SHERIDAN, KULLBERG, and RUSSELL.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
The appellant, Agbayani Construction Corporation (ACC) and the respondent,
Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
jointly move to dismiss the above-captioned appeal for lack of jurisdiction.  
Background
On August 31, 2016, ACC submitted a certified claim in the amount of $208,502, to
a NOAA contracting officer concerning contract AB1330-12-CN-0117.  Pursuant to the
Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012), the contracting officer has
sixty days from receipt of a certified claim over $100,000 to either “issue a decision” or
“notify the contractor of the time within which a decision will be issued.”  41 U.S.C.
§ 7103(f)(2).  The implementing regulations in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
include the same time frame.  48 CFR 33.211(c)(2) (2015).  The FAR also adds that in the


CBCA 5534 2
event the contracting officer notifies the contractor within sixty days of a later date for
issuing the decision, “[t]he contracting officer shall issue a decision within a reasonable time,
taking into account — (1) The size and complexity of the claim; (2) The adequacy of the
contractor’s supporting data; and (3) Any other relevant factors.”  Accordingly, the statutory
and regulatory framework is clear that the contracting officer had until October 31, 2016, to
either issue a decision or notify ACC of a later date by which the decision would be issued.
On Friday, October 28, 2016, the contracting officer sent an email message to ACC’s
counsel indicating that a final decision would be issued “on or before February 28, 2016
[sic].”  This notification was received within the sixty-day limitation set forth in the CDA. 
Accordingly, the Government’s actions do not constitute a “deemed denial” in accordance
with the CDA.  See 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(5) (stating that “[F]ailure by a contracting officer
to issue a decision on a claim within the required time period is deemed to be a decision by
the contracting officer denying the claim and authorizes an appeal” to the Board).  Since the
time period for issuing a final decision has not elapsed, this appeal is premature and, as a
result, the Board lacks jurisdiction.  See Fire Security Systems, Inc. v. General Services
Administration, GSBCA 12350, 93-3 BCA ¶ 26,047 (dismissing appeal as premature when
sixty days had not passed since appellant’s request for a contracting officer’s final decision).
Decision
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
We concur:
                                                                                                                          
H. CHUCK KULLBERG BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge Board Judge