Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 24, 2013
CBCA 3077
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Kate Gorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, San
Francisco, CA, and Ronald D. Sullivan, Office of the Regional Counsel, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Austin, TX, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
Xerox Corporation claimed that it was entitled to be paid $1,049,072.47 for
equipment, supplies, and services it provided to the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Los
Angeles, California, under a contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs.  The
company appealed a deemed denial of this claim.
The parties have now filed a stipulation of dismissal, stating that they have settled the
matters in dispute and request dismissal of the appeal.  

CBCA 3077 2
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_____________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 18, 2007 
CBCA 661 
MVM, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 
Respondent. 
Tenley A. Carp of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Armando Rodriguez-Feo, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 28, 2007, this Board received a notice of appeal from MVM, Inc. 
(contractor) concerning its contract, MS-02-D-0002, with the United States Marshals 
Service.  In a certified claim dated December 14, 2006, the contractor had requested payment 
of $710,295.28. The contractor contends that this amount is based upon properly invoiced 
amounts (plus Prompt Payment Act interest) for work it performed pursuant to the contract 
in 2005 and 2006 and which was accepted by the Government.  Having not received a 
decision by the contracting officer, the contractor filed this appeal based upon a deemed 
denial of its claim. 
The parties engaged in discussions regarding the particulars of the invoices and 
payment.  By a submission received on June 15, 2007, the contractor provided the Board with 
a statement that the parties have resolved the underlying dispute.  The stated withdrawal of 

       
_________________________ 
2 CBCA 661 
the appeal is understood to mean a joint request for a dismissal with prejudice, as conveyed 
during a telephone conference on May 31. 
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE  this appeal. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 24, 2017 
CBCA 5479 
M&M MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Marlin Millender, President of M&M Management Services, Inc., Augusta, GA,
appearing for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 17, 2017, the appellant submitted a motion to the Board requesting that the
Board dismiss the above-referenced matter.  In accordance with the appellant’s request, this
matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 18, 2014
CBCA 3792
COMMUNITY FIRST SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Jonathan D. Shaffer, Mary Pat Buckenmeyer, and Zachary D. Prince of Smith,
Pachter, McWorter PLC, Tysons Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
William Robinson and Seth Bogin, Office of General counsel, Federal Bureau of
Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 17, 2014, the Board received a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
_______________________________
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: January 8, 2009 
CBCA 1373 
UNISYS CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
William A. Wotherspoon and Susan D. Falkson of  Unisys Corporation, Reston, VA, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Charles B. Wallace, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, 
DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On January 8, 2009, the parties filed with the Board a joint motion to dismiss this 
appeal with prejudice. In the motion, the parties represent that they have reached settlement 
and “executed an agreement for the compromise settlement and release of all claims asserted 
by Unisys Corporation in this case.” 

                                                             
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 13, 2014
CBCA 3385
CLIFFORD FAIN,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Clifford Fain, pro se, Sautee, GA.
Jay McWhirter, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
McCANN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 28, 2013, appellant filed an appeal in this case contending that he was
entitled to a monetary recovery and the cancellation of his contract with the Forest Service
because the timber estimates provided were incorrect.  On March 7, 2014, the Board received
from the parties a joint motion to dismiss.  The motion indicated that all outstanding issues
between the parties had been resolved and requested that the matter be dismissed with
prejudice.  Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 10, 2022
CBCA 7052
HICAPS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
John M. Manfredonia of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC, Cresskill, NJ, counsel for
Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Houston, TX;
and Laetitia C.  Coleman, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Lakewood,
CO, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly, the above- captioned
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Patricia J. Sheridan     
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 11, 2013
CBCA 3448
INITIATIVES INC.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Joyce V. Lyons, President of Initiatives Inc., Boston, MA, appearing for Appellant.
William C. Buckhold and R. René Dupuy, Office of General Counsel, Agency for
International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge
ORDER
On August 22, 2013, respondent, Agency for International Development, moved to
dismiss the above-captioned appeal with prejudice, noting that it had rescinded the contracting
officer’s final decision upon which the appeal was based.  A telephone conference was held
on September 11, 2013, in which appellant, Initiatives Inc., agreed to the dismissal. 
Accordingly, CBCA 3448 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 19, 2019
CBCA 6166
VXL ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Edward J. Tolchin of Offit Kurman, PA, Bethesda, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Dennis J. Gallagher, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 19, 2019, appellant filed a notice of dismissal.  Appellant indicated that the
matter had settled.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 17, 2009
 
CBCA 1463
 
LARRY BARHAM,
 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
Larry Barham, pro se, Ashland, OR. 
Richard A. De Clerck, Office of the Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior, 
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent. 
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On October 24, 2008, a contracting officer for the Department of the Interior’s 
Bureau of Land Management issued a decision terminating for cause a contract awarded to 
appellant, Larry Barham, for the harvesting of Douglas Fir and Western Hemlock cones 
from selected trees located in an orchard in Oregon.  The contracting officer’s decision also 
assessed excess reprocurement costs in the amount of $4961.04.  Appellant filed a timely 
appeal. 
Thereafter, counsel for respondent advised the Board that the parties had settled their 
dispute and that appellant would provide the Board with a letter seeking to withdraw the 
appeal and the agency would submit documentation of the canceled debt.  Appellant has 
filed a letter asking to withdraw his appeal and the Government has filed documentation 

 
 
_________________________________ 
2 CBCA 1463 
showing that the debt has been extinguished and that the terms of the settlement have been 
fully performed.  
In accordance with the request of the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE. 
CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 30, 2010 
CBCA 2039 
DESIGN ONE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Christopher W. Martin of Ayres & Parkey, Knoxville, TN, counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas J. Mitchell and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General Counsel, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
Design One Building Systems, Inc. (Design One), leases to the Department of 
Veterans Affairs (VA) a building in Knoxville, Tennessee. Design One submitted to the VA 
contracting officer several claims under this lease, and after the claims were denied, appealed 
the contracting officer’s decisions to this Board. 
The parties are engaged in settlement discussions concerning the claims, with a Board 
judge facilitating the discussions. The parties have resolved one of the matters in dispute -­
the claim for an equitable adjustment for materials used in constructing a buildout of the 
structure to suit the VA’s needs, which has been docketed as CBCA 2039. The parties have 
jointly moved the Board to dismiss this case with prejudice to its reinstatement. 

 
      
_________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2039
 
Accordingly, CBCA 2039 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 24, 2018
CBCA 6076
GREEN IT SYSTEMS GROUP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Kenneth A. Martin of The Martin Law Firm, McLean, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Jeffrey D. Webb, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 23, 2018, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 12(c) (48 CFR 6101.12(c) (2017)).  The motion is granted,
and thus, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
 Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 18, 2007 
CBCA 685 
TRAUTMAN’S PAINTING, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
 
Respondent. 
Gerald A. Gordinier, Rochester, MI, counsel for Appellant. 
Ratna C. Gupta, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Lakewood, CO, 
counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties have entered into a stipulation of agreement and settlement in the above-
captioned case, converting a termination for default into a no-cost settlement.  Each party 
also agrees to pay its own attorney fees and costs. The settlement agreement was forwarded 
to the Board by counsel for respondent with a request that the case be dismissed with 
prejudice.  Counsel for appellant has indicated that he concurs in the request.  
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 30, 2023
CBCA 7730
SAW CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Tara L. Chadbourn and Jesse Gordon of Reaves PLLC, Chesapeake, VA, counsel for
Appellant.
Kathleen Ramos, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Arlington, TX, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On June 29, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice,
informing the Board that the parties had reached a settlement and finalized the necessary
contract modification.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
    Erica S. Beardsley    
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
_________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 7, 2012 
CBCA 2279 
SIDE BAR AND ASSOCIATES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
 
Respondent. 
Philip M. Smith, Jr., Culver City, CA, counsel for Appellant. 
Joseph Stein, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health and Human 
Services, San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties settled this dispute in May 2012 and informed the Board that a motion to 
dismiss the matter would be forthcoming once appellant had been paid the settlement 
amount. Appellant has now advised that it has received payment in full and requested that 
the matter be dismissed. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CATHERINE B. HYATT 
Board Judge 

2 CBCA 2279
______________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 12, 2011 
CBCA 2303 
BANNUM, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 
Respondent. 
Joseph A. Camardo of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant. 
William D. Robinson and Oleta L. Thomas, Office of General Counsel, Department 
of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Respondent, by notice of corrective action and motion to dismiss, advised that the 
Government had decided to pay appellant the total amount of its cost claim, i.e., $1320. 
Since the Government had alreadywithdrawn the deficiency citation that had been the subject 
of the instant appeal, the appeal has been rendered completely moot. Appellant had been 
afforded the opportunity to raise objection to respondent’s motion and to provide any valid 
legal basis for proceeding with the appeal. It failed to do so. Accordingly, the appeal hereby 
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 28, 2026
CBCA 8889
OREADY LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Michael Faro, Member of Oready LLC, Las Vegas, NV, appearing for Appellant.
Brian A. Quint, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 23, 2026, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
based on their settlement agreement.  Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)
(published in eCFR)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 14, 2015
CBCA 4618
SAM BICKLE LOGGING, INC.,
                                    Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                                  Respondent.
Jon E. Cushman of Cushman Law Offices, P.S., Olympia, WA, counsel for Appellant.
Benjamin R. Hartman, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On September 2, 2015, the parties informed the Board that this matter was settled and
jointly moved for a dismissal with prejudice.
Accordingly, CBCA 4618 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
GRANTED: November 22, 2010 
CBCA 1842 
CADDELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Stephen R. Miller of Miller Schirger LLC, Kansas City, MO, counsel for Appellant. 
Leigh Erin S. Izzo, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administrtion, New 
York, NY; and Catherine Crow, Office of General Counsel, General Services 
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges BORWICK , VERGILIO , and GOODMAN . 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
On December 23, 2009, the Board received from Caddell Construction Company 
(contractor) a notice of appeal, seeking $172,800.62 which it claims the General Services 
Administration (Government) wrongfully deducted from its contract, GS-07P-05-UEC-3003, 
to construct a courthouse in El Paso, Texas. The Board has jurisdiction over this timely-filed 
appeal pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006). 
In a stipulation, the parties jointly request the Board to enter judgment for the 
contractor in the amount of $172,800.62 in full and final settlement of the claims presented. 
The amount includes costs, attorney fees, and interest. Each party agrees that it will not seek 
reconsideration, and will not file an appeal, of this decision. The parties intend that the 
amount be paid through the judgment fund, pursuant to law, 31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. 
§ 612. 

 
          
  
 
 
    
  
2 CBCA 1842 
Decision
 
The Board GRANTS the appeal. The contractor shall recover $172,800.62.
 
______________________________ 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
________________________ ________________________ 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  November 17, 2021
CBCA 6812
MISSION SUPPORT ALLIANCE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Marisa M. Bavand and Allison L. Murphy of Groff Murphy PLLC, Seattle, WA,
counsel for Appellant.
Paul R. Davis and Andrew J. Unsicker, Office of Chief Counsel, Department of
Energy, Richland, WA, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties filed a joint stipulation requesting dismissal of this appeal with prejudice
following settlement of the dispute underlying the appeal.  In accordance with the parties’
request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own
costs, expenses, and attorney fees.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 27, 2020
CBCA 6711
CGI FEDERAL, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Karen L. Manos and Erin N. Rankin of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Patrick W. Turner and Ivy N. Barnett, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On August 27, 2020, the parties notified the Board that the above-referenced matter
settled and requested that the Board dismiss the appeal.  In accordance with the parties’
request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Jeri Kaylene Somers       
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 25, 2016
CBCA 5171
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Baltimore, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Jason A. Blindauer, Office of General Counsel, Department of Health and Human
Services,  Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of a joint motion for dismissal with prejudice.  In it, the parties
advise that the appeal has been resolved and that the settlement amount has been paid. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
_________________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  April 30, 2007 
CBCA 406, 409 
RICHARD E. McCLEARY, 
A p p e l l a n t , 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Thomas E. Lynch, III, and John E. Prominski, Jr., of Miles & Stockbridge P.C., 
Frederick, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Richard O. Hughes, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges PARKER , BORWICK, and DeGRAFF . 
PARKER , Board Judge. 
Appellant, Richard E. McCleary (McCleary), appealed three final decisions of a 
General Services Administration (GSA) contracting officer regarding the termination of lease 
number GS-03B-99011 for a warehouse located in Kearneysville, West Virginia.  On 
April 23, 2007, the parties filed a joint request for entry of judgment and a settlement 
agreement that stated, in pertinent part: 

  
 
 
 
___________________________ 
2 CBCA 406, 409 
2. Settlement Payment .  GSA and McCleary agree that payment 
from the United States to McCleary for a total sum of $495,000.00 . . . will 
constitute full and final settlement of this Appeal. . . . 
. . . . 
4. Processing the Settlement Payment. . . . GSA shall submit 
requests for payment of the Settlement Amount to the Treasury Department’s 
Financial Management Service within three business days after receipt of the 
Board’s entry of judgment . . . . 
The parties also agreed that if payment is not received by appellant within thirty days, 
appellant shall be entitled to interest on the settlement amount commencing on the thirty-first 
day after the date of this decision.  They have also stated that neither party will seek 
reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision, and that neither party will appeal the 
Board’s decision. 
Decision 
The Board adopts the parties’ settlement agreement and, consequently, these appeals 
are GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the settlement agreement, appellant is 
awarded $495,000, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 
31 U.S.C. § 1304. 
ROBERT W. PARKER 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
________________________________ ____________________________ 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK MARTHA H. DeGRAFF 
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 25, 2015
CBCA 4689, 4690
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Andrew K. Wible and Andrew J. Mohr of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Harold W. Askins III, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Charleston, SC, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER
Appellant advises that respondent has paid the claims asserted in the consolidated
appeals in full and, with the agreement of respondent, requests that the Board dismiss the
appeals with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED:  June 10, 2021
CBCA 5713
ADVISORY OPINION REQUEST RE:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR
SOLUTIONS, LLC AND FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00825-JMC (D.S.C.)
Karen L. Manos, Daniel P. Chung, and Jonathan M. Phillips of Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC and
Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
Donald M. Yenovkian II, Senior Counsel of Fluor Federal Services, Inc., Greenville,
SC, counsel for Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
Don Williamson, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for
United States.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 6, 2021, the Board transmitted to the United States District Court for the
District of South Carolina the advisory opinion on matters of contract interpretation
requested by the court pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7107(f) (2018), in
the civil action referenced above.  On June 8, 2021, the court entered the Board’s advisory
opinion on the public docket of the civil action.
The matter before this Board is DISMISSED.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 1, 2016
CBCA 4751
FLOWSENSE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Timothy M. Connelly of The Law Office of Tim Connelly PLLC, Edina, MN, counsel
for Appellant.
Elyssa Tanenbaum, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of the appellant’s motion to dismiss the above referenced
matter.  The appellant indicates that the parties have settled the appeal and requests that the
Board dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  
In accordance with the request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 27, 2023
CBCA 7617
BOP 650 MASS LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Robert C. MacKichan, Gordon N. Griffin, and Danielle R. Rich of Holland & Knight
LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Kristi Singleton, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 25, 2023, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement and
requested that this appeal be dismissed.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 19, 2018
CBCA 6062
CHP INTERNATIONAL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Respondent.
Howard A. Raik, President of CHP International, Oak Park, IL, appearing for
Appellant.
Vijaya S. Surampudi, Dennis A. Adelson, and Anna Davis Walker, Office of the
Solicitor, Department of Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
As jointly requested by the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
  Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: June 26, 2015
CBCA 4562
GWSI, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Kevin R. Boyle and Andrew S. Esler of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP,
Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant.
Kasia Dourney, Christian Butler, and John Sabatino, Office of Chief Counsel,
Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC,
counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 20, 2015, GWSI, Inc. filed a notice of appeal concerning a decision by
a contracting officer of Customs and Border Protection.  The decision suspends the selection
of GWSI as an operator of the Centralized Examination Station at the Port of Philadelphia
and proposes to revoke and cancel GWSI’s status as an operator at that location.  The Board
questioned its jurisdiction to proceed with this matter.  On June 24, 2015, the parties filed a
joint motion seeking a dismissal without prejudice.  GWSI is withdrawing the appeal without
prejudice; the contracting officer is reconsidering the proposed revocation; and the parties
have agreed upon a methodology of proceeding to a final administrative determination.  In


CBCA 4562 2
accordance with the request of the parties, the Board DISMISSES WITHOUT
PREJUDICE the appeal; the issue of Board jurisdiction is moot.
______________________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 13, 2014
CBCA 3356
GONZALES & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Robert F. Roos and Michael J. Hammer of Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP, Phoenix, AZ,
counsel for Appellant.
Luisa M. Alvarez, Office of the Legal Adviser, United States Section, International
Boundary and Water Commission, El Paso, TX, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have settled this matter.  Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 8, 2015
CBCA 3475
PETER CHASTAIN & ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Peter Chastain of Peter Chastain & Associates, P.A., Greensboro, NC, counsel for
Appellant.
Samuel H. Williams, Office of General Counsel, Region IV, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
In July 2013, Peter Chastain & Associates, P.A., filed an appeal at the Board disputing
the denial of its claims concerning its contract, C-ATL-02001 with the Department of
Housing and Urban Development.  The parties have settled this matter.  In accordance with
the joint notice of the parties, received on December 7, 2015, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE this appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: September 29, 2016
CBCA 5207
VETERANS CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Scott R. Sylkatis of Sylkatis Law, LLC, Amherst, OH, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 12, 2016, the Board received from Veterans Contracting, Inc.
(contractor) a timely-filed notice of appeal concerning its contract, VA250-12-C-0111, with
the Department of Veterans Affairs (agency).  Formal proceedings were suspended at the
request of the parties.  On September 27, the Board received from the contractor a motion
to dismiss without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(d) (48 CFR 6101.12(d) (2015)) (“When
circumstances beyond the control of the Board prevent the continuation of proceedings in a
case, the Board may . . . dismiss the case without prejudice to reinstatement within 180
calendar days after the date of the dismissal”).  The motion identifies no reason that might
prevent the continuation of proceedings.  The contractor is aware that the dismissal will act
as a preclusion from pursuing the claim.  The agency does not object to the dismissal,


CBCA 5207 2
although it opines that voluntary dismissals are under Rule 12(c) and are with prejudice. 
Given the motion and lack of objection, the Board DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE
the appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 26, 2019
CBCA 6295
FAYETTEVILLE VA COMPANY, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Jonathan R. Khouri of Carnegie Management and Development Corporation,
Westlake, OH, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Donald Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver,
CO, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 21, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice,
advising that the parties had successfully settled this appeal.  The Board commends the
parties on their settlement, and consistent with the parties’ request and Board Rule 12(b)(2),
this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
   Beverly M. Russell       
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 3, 2021
CBCA 6519, 6994
IN AND OUT VALET COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr. of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for
Appellant.
Hank W. Askins III, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Charleston, SC; and Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Decatur, GA, counsel for Respondent.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have jointly requested dismissal of these appeals with prejudice.  Pursuant
to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2019)), the request is granted.  These appeals are
hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jerome M. Drummond    
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 31, 2022
CBCA 7188
ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Celeste A. Jewell, Senior Contract Manager of Advanced Concepts and Technologies
International, LLC, Arlington, VA, appearing for Appellant.
Peter G. Hartman and Roger A. Hipp, Office of the General Counsel, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised the Board that this appeal has been settled and have filed a
joint motion to dismiss this appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 19, 2019
CBCA 6478
MISSION SUPPORT ALLIANCE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Marisa M. Bavand of Groff Murphy PLLC, Seattle, WA, counsel for Appellant.
Paul R. Davis and Andrew J. Unsicker, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of
Energy, Richland, WA, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge (Chair).
ORDER
On June 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the above-referenced
matter.  In accordance with the parties’ request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Jeri Kaylene Somers       
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 11, 2025
CBCA 8081
CONCIERGE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Luis Montanez, Owner, Concierge Business Solutions, Inc., appearing for Appellant;
Jonathan Bondy and Amanda L. Miceli of Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, Roseland,
NJ, counsel for American Alternative Insurance Corporation.
Jared M. Levin, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Brockton, MA, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 24, 2025, the parties submitted a joint request for dismissal of the captioned
appeal in light of their settlement of all issues in dispute.  Concierge Business Solutions, Inc.
has assigned its claims in this appeal to its surety, American Alternative Insurance
Corporation, and the agency has agreed to this assignment.  Thus, the surety is authorized to
settle the dispute.


CBCA 8081 2
The Board commends the parties on the successful resolution of this matter. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Jonathan D. Zischkau   
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
_______________________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 27, 2012 
CBCA 2451 
PENTAD NEVADA, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Johnathan M. Bailey and Christopher G. Burwell of Bailey & Bailey, P.C., San 
Antonio, TX, counsel for Appellant. 
Daniel B. Rosenbluth, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Golden, CO, counsel for Respondent. 
GOODMAN, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
After an alternative dispute resolution proceeding conducted by a Board Judge, the 
parties have advised the Board that this appeal has been settled and have jointly requested 
that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 30, 2010 
CBCA 1830 
THIRD AVENUE BUSINESS CENTER, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Jed L. Weinberg of Weitzen, Phillips & Weinberg LLP, San Diego, CA, counsel for 
Appellant. 
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On May 28, 2009, appellant filed a claim for additional operating costs under lease 
GS-09B-01046.  By final decision dated September 14, 2009, the contracting officer denied 
that claim.  Appellant appealed that decision to this Board on December 15, 2009. 
Appellant has moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice with respondent’s concurrence. 
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 25, 2016
CBCA 3686
JAMES WEST AUTOMOTIVE,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
James and Cynthia West of James West Automotive, Las Vegas, NV, appearing for
appellant.
Nathan C. Guerrero, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, and Charles G. McCarthy, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services
Administration, San Francisco, CA, counsel for respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 23, 2016, the respondent filed, with the concurrence of appellant, a request
to dismiss the captioned appeal based on a settlement reached by the parties.  The Board
commends the parties on reaching a settlement of their dispute.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 9, 2009 
CBCA 1427, 1428, 1470, 1471 
BEN FITZGERALD REAL ESTATE SERVICE, LLC 
d/b/a ROSEMARK, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Diana Parks Curran of Curran Legal Services Group, Inc., Duluth, GA, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
GOODMAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
These appeals were resolved in an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) proceeding 
conducted by a Board Judge serving as an ADR neutral.  The parties have filed a joint motion 
to dismiss stating that the appeals are fully and finally settled and requesting dismissal with 
prejudice.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  March 1, 2007 
CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 
INNOVATIVE (PBX) TELEPHONE SERVICE,
       Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
       Respondent. 
David W. Young, Vice President of Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, El Paso, 
TX, appearing for Appellant. 
Brian Reed and Dennis Foley, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge.
 ORDER 
On February 6, 2007, the parties advised the Board that they have settled the matters 
set forth below and jointly moved the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice.  Pursuant 
to the agreement of the parties, and in accordance with the settlement agreement entered into 
between the parties, the appeals of Innovative (PBX) Telephone Service, CBCA 6, 36, 37, 
38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43, are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . This 
dismissal shall convert to one with prejudice ninety days from the date of this order or upon 
effectuation of the settlement agreement, whichever occurs first. 

 
__________________________ 
2 CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 
CBCA 44, 45, 46, and 576 remain on the Board’s docket with all memoranda and 
orders relating to those appeals in effect. 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge 

3 CBCA 6, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 
#18098 CBCA 6, 36-43 INNOVATIVETELPHONESERVICE.doc 3/1/07 Reviewed by:PJS CLH
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 17, 2010 
CBCA 1727 
AG/ARG @ AVION, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Neil D. Goldman of Young, Goldman & Van Beek, P.C., Alexandria, VA, counsel 
for Appellant. 
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
AG/ARG @ Avion, LLC leased to the General Services Administration (GSA) space 
in a building located in Chantilly, Virginia.  The lease provided that upon its conclusion, 
GSA would demolish and remove all interior improvements installed by or for the 
Government during the lease term and would make necessary patches and repairs. 
After the lease term ended, GSA removed vinyl composition tiles which had been 
installed on the floors, and the concrete slab on which they had been laid was found to be 
damaged.  The lessor claimed that GSA had injured the slab in removing the tiles and 

 
 
 
           
      
 
______________________________ 
2 CBCA 1727 
demanded payment of $98,945 to make repairs.  GSA’s contracting officer denied the claim; 
he determined that the slab had been defective before the tiles had been installed and that 
the lessor was consequently responsible for the problem.  The lessor appealed his decision. 
The parties have now resolved their dispute, with GSA having paid the lessor 
$15,000 to settle the claim. The lessor has asked the Board to dismiss the appeal with 
prejudice to its reinstatement. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 20, 2014
CBCA 3893
MOUNTAIN AIR, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
H. Todd Whay of The Whay Law Firm, Sterling, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Mark R. Simpson, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge. 
ORDER
The parties have entered into a settlement agreement and appellant requests that this
appeal, in its entirety, be dismissed with prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 5, 2015
CBCA 3831
THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
David M. Nadler and Justin A. Chiarodo of Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Scott Risner, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International Development,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 4, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this matter, advising the
Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  December 29, 2015
CBCA 3070, 3368
CAIN CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Lawrence M. Prosen and Christian F. Henel of Thompson Hine LLP, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Russell L. Emery, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 24, 2015, appellant filed, with respondent’s concurrence, a withdrawal
and dismissal of appeals, advising that the parties have settled their disputes underlying the
captioned appeals.  The Board commends the parties on reaching a settlement.  Accordingly,
we DISMISS the appeals WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 12, 2010 
CBCA 2090 
DOMINIC MAESTAS, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Dominic Maestas, pro se, Santa Cruz, NM. 
Patricia Leigh Disert , Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture , 
Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 15, 2010, Dominic Maestas filed a notice of appeal in connection with a 
dispute under contract number AG-83D5-E-10-9011, for equipment used at the Santa Fe 
National Forest. On August 9, 2010, appellant advised the Board that the parties had reached 
a settlement and requested that the appeal be withdrawn.  Respondent has no objection to the 
dismissal of the appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: February 21, 2018
CBCA 6008
WESTLAKE FARMS, INC., 
Appellant,
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Flavia Berys of DLA Piper LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, counsel for Appellant.
Catherine Crow, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
Westlake Farms, Inc. filed a notice of appeal on January 24, 2018, from a contracting
officer’s decision dated ninety-nine days earlier, October 17, 2017.  The decision denied a
claim by Westlake Farms for payments under a lease totaling, as far as we can tell, less than
$100,000.  We ordered Westlake Farms to show cause why we should not dismiss its appeal
as untimely under 41 U.S.C. § 7104(a) (2012) (permitting appeal to the Board “within 90
days from the date of receipt of a contracting officer’s decision”).  Westlake Farms did not
respond, even after we extended the time to do so.  Because it appears from the record before
us that Westlake Farms received the contracting officer’s decision more than ninety days
before it filed the appeal, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to proceed.  See DekaTron
Corp. v. Department of Labor, CBCA 4444, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,045, at 176,059.


CBCA 6008 2
Decision
The appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
___________________________
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
We concur:
____________________________ __________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 22, 2007 
CBCA 536 
TELESIS CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 
Respondent. 
Kurt D. Ferstl and Leigh T. Hansson of Reed Smith LLP, Washington, DC, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Ralph G. Bittelari and Richard E. Hurst, Office of Chief Counsel, Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for 
Respondent. 
STERN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 
(ATF) awarded Telesis Corporation (Telesis) a delivery order for support seminars at AFT’s 
National Training Center.  The order was issued against a General Services Administration 
contract with Telesis. Telesis filed with the contracting officer various claims arising out of 
contract performance.  These claims were denied and Telesis appealed to the Department of 
Transportation Board of Contract Appeals (DOTBCA).
1  Telesis sought $647,525.20, plus 
1 Pursuant to statute all the cases pending before the DOTBCA were transferred 
to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals on January 6, 2007. Pub. L. No. 109-163, § 847, 

                                                                                                       
 
__________________________ 
                                 2 CBCA 536 
interest for various alleged government actions and inactions. 
Subsequent to pretrial proceedings, Telesis filed a motion for dismissal of the appeal.
 ATF does not oppose the motion. 
The appellant’s motion is granted.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE. 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge 
119 Stat. 3136, 3391 (2006).
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 11, 2017
CBCA 4309
HGL CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
David A. Rose and Gary L. Moser of Rose Consulting Law Firm, Valdosta, GA,
counsel for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veteran Affairs, 
Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 7, 2017, appellant filed a joint request to dismiss the captioned appeal
based on a settlement agreement.  The Board commends the parties on reaching a settlement
of their dispute.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 14, 2015
CBCA 4467
VETSUMMIT, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Mark W. Bernlohr and Sandra K. Zerrusen of Jackson Kelly PLLC, Akron, OH,
counsel for Appellant.
Lindsay C. Roop, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Columbus, OH, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On July 24, 2015, the parties notified the Board that they had reached a settlement of
all issues in this appeal and that, once appellant had received payment pursuant to the terms
of the agreement, appellant would file a motion to dismiss the appeal.  

CBCA 4467         2
On August 13, 2015, appellant filed its motion to dismiss.  In accordance with that
motion, which respondent does not oppose, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
____________________________
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 28, 2019
CBCA 6368
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Jeffrey A. Belkin and Jessica L. Sharron, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, counsel
for Appellant.
Lindsay A. Collins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 30, 2019, the Board received from Insight Public Sector, Inc. a timely
appeal of a contracting officer’s decision of a government claim demanding payment.  The
parties have resolved the dispute.  Having rescinded the request for payment, the agency does
not pursue its claim.  In accordance with the request of the parties, the Board DISMISSES
WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
     Joseph A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge