Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
GRANTED IN PART: December 15, 2011 
CBCA 2170, 2432, 2592 
AIM HIGH MEDICAL, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Pat Youngblood and Larry Elliott, Owners of Aim High Medical, LLC, Circleville, 
OH, appearing for Appellant. 
Lisa M. Clark, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Brecksville, OH, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges McCANN , STEEL , and KULLBERG . 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
Following mediation conducted by the presiding judge, on December 2, 2011, the 
Board received from Aim High Medical, LLC (Aim High) and the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (VA) a joint motion for stipulated judgment and a settlement agreement. This motion 
requested that the Board adopt the settlement agreement by way of a decision, stating in part 
that: 
VA agrees to pay Aim High an all-inclusive sum of $500,000.00 as full and 
complete compensation for all costs, direct and indirect, including but not 
limited to attorney’s fees and interest associated with the above-referenced 

   
          
          
  
    
               
             
            
           
    
              
           
           
               
   
               
              
       
    
_________________________________ 
  
 
 
__________________________________       __________________________________ 
    
  
2 CBCA 2170, 2432, 2592 
appeals and any other appeals filed, pending, anticipated, known or unknown, 
relating in any way to durable medical equipment contracts or solicitations 
with VA. 
. . . . 
If payment is made more than 90 days from the date of the last signature on 
this agreement, in addition to the $500,000.00, the VA shall pay to Aim High, 
Contract Disputes Act interest on that amount accruing from the 91st day after 
the last signature on this Joint Motion for Stipulated Judgment and Settlement 
Agreement [November 23, 2011]. 
In their joint motion, the parties agree that they will not seek reconsideration of or 
relief from this Board’s decision, and will not appeal the Board’s decision. 
Decision 
Accordingly, these appeals are GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the 
parties’ motion, the Board awards to Aim High Medical, LLC, the sum of $500,000, to be 
paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006).  If payment is 
not made within ninety days after November 23, 2011, interest shall also be paid to Aim 
High. Such interest shall be calculated in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act, 41 
U.S.C.A. § 7109(b) (West Supp. 2011), from the ninety-first day after November 23, 2011, 
until the date of payment. 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
R. ANTHONY McCANN H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge Board Judge 

   3 CBCA 2170, 2432, 2592
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 29, 2021
CBCA 7212
NCN TECHNOLOGY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Stacy Vasilatos, Operations Manager of NCN Technology, Reston, VA, appearing for
Appellant.
Michael H. Noyes, Office of the Chief Counsel, United States Secret Service,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have resolved their disputes detailed in the claim underlying this appeal. 
In accordance with the request of the appellant, the Board DISMISSES WITH
PREJUDICE the appeal.
     Joseph  A. Vergilio        
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 2, 2012 
CBCA 2474 
ENVIRONMENTAL FORESTRY, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Michael H. Church and Darren M. Digiactino of Stamper Rubens, P.S., Spokane, WA, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Marissa J. Suarez, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
Environmental Forestry, Inc., appealed the decision of a contracting officer of the 
Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service terminating for default a contract for thinning 
trees in Sierra National Forest, California. The appeal has been resolved through mediation 
jointly requested by the parties and conducted by a Board judge. 
On July 31, 2012, the parties moved the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, 
with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 
      
  
__________________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2474
 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 5, 2013  
CBCA 2836 
CP3, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent.
Evan B. Gatewood of Hayes Magrini & Gatewood, Oklahoma City, OK, counsel for
Appellant.
Sue E. Umshler, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Albuquerque, NM,
counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 11, 2012, CP3, Inc. (CP3) appealed the final decision of a Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs contracting officer denying CP3’s claim under contract
number BIA CMG00122101 to construct the Maud Farm I Project on behalf of the Seminole
tribe in Oklahoma.  On March 1, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal
with prejudice, stating that the parties entered in a settlement agreement and there is no other
issue pending in this appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
__________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 23, 2007 
CBCA 615 
STG, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
Respondent. 
John C. Weldin, Vice President & General Counsel of STG, Inc., Reston, VA, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Herman J. Narcho, Division of Management and Administrative Legal Services, 
Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
On May 23, 2007, the appellant advised the Board that the parties settled the matters 
giving rise to the appeal.  Consequently, appellant withdraws its appeal and requests 
dismissal with prejudice to reinstatement of the case.  Pursuant to appellant’s request, this 
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
Street Address:  Mailing Address: 
6th Floor, 1800 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036     •   1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 14, 2020
CBCA 6035
TERACORE, INC.,
                                   Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                                                                              Respondent.
Timothy A. Furin of Ward & Berry, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Melissa D. McClellan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 13, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice,
representing that the parties had settled this matter.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
 
  Patricia J. Sheridan      
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 29, 2016
CBCA 5099
FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Timothy B. Hyland of Harris, St. Laurent and Chaudhry LLP, Reston, VA counsel for
Appellant.
James V. Scuro, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Eatontown, NJ, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 11, 2015, the Board received from Four Points Technology, L.L.C. a
timely notice of appeal concerning its contract, NNG07DA16B - VA256-14-F-3640, with
the Department of Veterans Affairs.  The underlying contract was for the lease of equipment
and maintenance services.  The appeal was taken based upon a denial of the lessor’s claim
for payment after the agency did not exercise option year two and assertion that equipment
was not returned.  The parties resolved the dispute.  In accordance with a joint motion to
dismiss received on March 29, 2016, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the
appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 26, 2012
CBCA 2886
JAMES COLLIER,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
James Collier, pro se, Cave Creek, AZ.
Nirlip Syan, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO , Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 11, 2012, the Board received a notice of appeal from James Collier
concerning a misdescribed vehicle he purchased at an auction held by the respondent, the
General Services Administration.  As stated in submissions dated September 25, the parties
have settled this dispute and request a dismissal with prejudice.
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE  this appeal.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 7, 2024
CBCA 7923
TRADEMASTERS SERVICE, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Katherine B. Burrows, Todd M. Reinecker, Lauren R. Brier, and Annie B. Hudgins
of PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Brett A. Pisciotta and David C. Charin, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 6, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2023)).  According to the motion,
the parties executed a settlement agreement on March 4, 2024, which resolved all issues in
dispute.  The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
   Kathleen J. O’Rourke    
KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 28, 2008 
CBCA 1085 
XEROX CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 
Respondent. 
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Lori R. Larson and John T. Kirsch, Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue 
Service, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 21, 2008, Xerox Corporation (Xerox) appealed the deemed denial by a 
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, contracting officer of its claims for 
payment under contract number GS-25F-0062L.  On July 23, 2008, Xerox filed a notice to 
dismiss the appeal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY  McCANN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 7, 2014
CBCA 3904
DPW TRAINING & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Deidre Powell White, CEO of DPW Training & Associates, LLC, Fredericksburg,
VA, appearing for Appellant.
R. René Dupuy, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International
Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 6, 2014, the parties jointly moved for dismissal of the above-referenced
appeal.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF OPINION 
ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER: January 24, 2017
CBCA 3760, 4822, 5281
SMITH MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
and
BRC LEASE COMPANY, L.L.C.,
Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 
Respondent.
Richard A. DeTar of McAllister, DeTar, Showalter & Walker, Easton, MD, counsel
for Appellants. 
Brian C. Caney, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Health Human
Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
NOTICE
On January 24, 2017, the Board issued its opinion on the respondent’s motion for
summary relief.  The respondent’s motion for summary relief was DENIED.  
Because the Board's decision may contain information considered by the parties to be
procurement sensitive or proprietary, the Board initially issues its decision subject in its
entirety to a protective order.  The parties are advised to inform the Board of any redactions
they consider appropriate by close of business Tuesday, January 31, 2017.  The Board will
decide at that time what portions of the decision will be redacted when the decision is made
public.   
__________________________
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 14, 2008
 
CBCA 122
 
MARTIN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
John T. Gassmann, Valley City, ND, counsel for Appellant. 
Margit Halvorson Williams, Office of the General Counsel, Department of 
Agriculture, St. Paul, MN, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal arises out of contract no. 50-6633-4-1, between Martin Construction, Inc. 
(Martin), and the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service (NRCS).  NRCS contracted with Martin for construction of a multi-purpose dam on 
the Square Butte Creek Watershed.  In performing the work, Martin incurred additional costs 
to those it anticipated relating to excavation, particularly rock excavation, and submitted a 
claim.  NRCS denied liability on the claim on the bases that the conditions encountered were 
represented in the contract, Martin did not encounter differing site conditions, compensation 
was under the variation in estimated quantities clause, and Martin failed to comply with 
notice provisions. Martin appealed NRCS’s denial to the Department of Agriculture Board 

   
  
 
         
_______________________________ 
2 CBCA 122 
of Contract Appeals on July 31, 2006, and the matter was docketed as AGBCA No. 2006­
149-1.  The appeal was transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, upon the 
consolidation of the civilian agency boards of contract appeals.  The matter was redocketed 
as CBCA 122.  After engaging in extensive discovery, the parties agreed to participate in 
mediation.  A three-day mediation was held in Bismarck, North Dakota, on April 8-10, 
2008.  At the time of mediation, the claim was $1,050,135.  Through mediation, the parties 
came to an agreement on compensation and entered into a Stipulation for Dismissal, globally 
settling all claims arising out of the contract. Under a cover letter dated April 30, 2008, the 
parties forwarded to the Board a Joint Motion to Dismiss, calling for dismissal of the appeal 
with prejudice.  
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 26, 2022
CBCA 5891, 6341, 6398, 6425
 
R.A. GLANCY & SONS, INC., 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., and Nancy M. Camardo of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn,
NY, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA; Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Denver, CO; and Steven Devine, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Falls Church, VA, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
In accordance with the parties’ request dated May 26, 2022, these appeals, which the
parties represent have been resolved through settlement, are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 17, 2008  
CBCA 1086, 1087, 1128, 1129, 1336, 1337, 1338 
CALL HENRY, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 
Respondent. 
Brian Koji of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Tampa, FL, counsel for Appellant. 
A. Neil Stroud, Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Research Triangle Park, NC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant, Call Henry, Inc., appealed the final decisions of an Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officer denying its claims under contract number 
EP-D-04-076 for service and maintenance of EPA facilities in Research Triangle Park, 
North Carolina.  On December 16, 2008, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss with 
prejudice, stating that these appeals have been resolved based upon mutual agreement of the 
parties. 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: June 8, 2026
CBCA 8727
ROOM TO ROAM FENCING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
David Yopp and Misty Yopp, Co-Owners, of Room to Roam Fencing, LLC, Moscow,
ID, appearing for Appellant.
Benjamin R. Hartman, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges KULLBERG, ZISCHKAU, and KANG.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
On June 4, 2026, the parties filed a joint stipulation for consent judgment.  Pursuant
to Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (published in eCFR)), the parties request that the Board
enter judgment in the amount of $6721, with payment to be made through the judgment fund
in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2024).  See also 41 U.S.C. § 7108.  The parties have
stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board’s
entry of judgment, see Rule 25(b), and that each party will be responsible for its costs,
attorney fees, and expenses incurred in this appeal.


CBCA 8727 2
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  Respondent shall pay $6721 to appellant,
Room to Roam Fencing, LLC.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
We concur:
   Jonathan D. Zischkau       Jonathan L. Kang         
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU JONATHAN L. KANG
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: December 9, 2014
CBCA 4090
RESEARCH SERVICES LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Anthony D. Edwards of San Juan Law Office, LLC, Silverton, CO, counsel for
Appellant.
Patricia Leigh Disert, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Albuquerque, NM, counsel for Respondent
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
ORDER
On December 5, 2014, the appellant filed an unopposed request to withdraw the
captioned appeal without prejudice.  Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
____________________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 30, 2011 
CBCA 2246 
QUOTIENT, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Laurence Schor and Dennis C. Ehlers of Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Kevin L. Pearson, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Roanoke, VA, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 30, 2010, the Board docketed this appeal. 
On June 16, 2011, appellant advised the Board that the parties had reached a 
settlement and requested that the Board dismiss this appeal. 

 
      
______________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2246 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 26, 2008 
CBCA 1117 
THOMAS A. RICHTER, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
 
Respondent. 
Thomas A. Richter, pro se, Downers Grove, IL. 
Gabriel N. Steinberg, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent. 
KULLBERG, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 18, 2008, the Government filed a request that this appeal be dismissed in 
that the parties had resolved this appeal.  Attached to the Government’s request was a copy 
of appellant’s electronic mail message dated August 14, 2008, with an attached status report, 
which confirmed the parties’ agreement that this appeal had been resolved and that further 
proceedings were not needed. 

______________________ 
2 CBCA 1117 
This appeal, accordingly, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
H. CHUCK KULLBERG 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 13, 2016
CBCA 3905
COOLEY CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Anton J. Rupert of Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, counsel for
Appellant.
Elyssa Tanenbaum, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have advised the Board that this case has been resolved.  On
January 8, 2016, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this matter.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
________________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: May 31, 2012 
CBCA 2630 
TRADE WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 
Respondent. 
C. Todd Leavitt, President of Trade West Construction, Inc., Mesquite, NV, appearing 
for Appellant. 
Tara Campbell Lewis, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Pittsburgh, 
PA, counsel for Respondent. 
ORDER 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
On November 21, 2011, the Board received from Trade West Construction, Inc. 
(TWC) a timely-filed notice of appeal concerning a dispute involving a contract with the 
Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement to 
excavate rockfall material and unstable material from a hillside in Beattyville, Kentucky. 
The parties elected to utilize a binding arbitration procedure to resolve the dispute. On this 
date, the arbitrator issued an order resolving all issues before the Board.  

 
  
    
_______________________ 
2 CBCA 2630 
In accordance with the arbitration agreement, there remains no dispute before the 
Board.  The case is therefore DISMISSED. 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 24, 2019
CBCA 5092
GOLDEN KEY GROUP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
David A. Temeles, Jr., Paul E. Harold, and Matthew C. Deputy of LaDue Curran
Kuehn, LLC, South Bend, IN, counsel for Appellant.
Jason A.M. Fragoso and Krishon Gill-Edmond, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
Having executed a bilateral contract modification resolving all issues between them,
the parties now ask the Board to dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  The parties’ request is
granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 7, 2011 
CBCA 2297 
JRS MANAGEMENT, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 
Respondent. 
Jacqueline Sims, Owner of JRS Management, Lawrenceville, GA, appearing for 
Appellant. 
William D. Robinson and Oleta L. Thomas, Office of General Counsel, Federal 
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 4, 2011, JRS Management (JRS) appealed the decision of a Department 
of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons contracting officer denying JRS’ claim under contract 
number DJBP010100000005 for parenting instructor services at the Federal Prison Camp in 
Alderson, West Virginia. 
On December 7, 2011, the parties requested that the appeal be dismissed with 
prejudice. 

  
      
___________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2297
 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 10, 2019
CBCA 6437
AVENTURA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Jack S. Cabasso, Managing Director of Aventura Technologies, Inc., Commack, NY,
appearing for Appellant.
Karen D. Glasgow, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, San Francisco,
CA, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 8, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned appeal
with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
 Patricia J. Sheridan    
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED:  April 18, 2023
CBCA 7714, 7715, 7716
MERCER FRASER COMPANY, 
Petitioner,
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Richard M. Harris and Neil H. O’Donnell of Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, PC, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Petitioner.
Jack F. Gilbert, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Lakewood, CO, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 17, 2023, Mercer Fraser Company (MFC) filed a petition with the Board
under section 7103(f)(4) of the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(4) (2018),
requesting that we order the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) contracting officer
to expedite issuance of decisions on three separate certified claims that MFC submitted
seeking monetary relief under a contract for highway repair work.  The FHWA contracting
officer received two of the three claims at issue on October 28, 2022, and the third on
December 16, 2022.  By letters dated December 28, 2022, and February 15, 2023, the
FHWA, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(2)(B), notified MFC that decisions on the three
claims would be issued by April 28, May 31, and October 31, 2023, respectively, instead of
within sixty days after the contracting officer’s receipt of each claim.  Because the petition


CBCA 7714, 7715, 7716 2
involved three separate certified claims, the Clerk of the Board viewed the petition as dealing
with three separate matters and assigned a separate docket number to each of the three
claims.  The Board, by order dated March 21, 2023, consolidated the three docket numbers.
The parties have now filed what they have titled “Joint Agreement on Petitioner’s
Requested Relief” in which they represent that they have resolved their disagreement about
the deadlines for issuance of final decisions, and they ask the Board to memorialize their
agreement in this order.  Specifically, the FWHA has agreed, with MFC’s approval, that the
contracting officer will issue a consolidated final decision addressing all three claims no later
than May 31, 2023.  The parties have also agreed that, if MFC has any other related claims
stemming out of the contract, MFC will submit them as quickly as possible with the hope
that the FHWA contracting officer can address them in his May 31, 2023, decision.  The
parties also agree to address any future claims as expeditiously as possible.
Based upon the parties’ agreement, the petition referencing the three claims, which
was docketed separately for each claim and then consolidated, is DISMISSED.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 15, 2010 
CBCA 1872 
ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 
Respondent. 
Rand L. Allen and Kevin J. Maynard of Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC, counsel 
for Appellant. 
Brenda D. Joseph-Chambers, Office of  General Counsel, Department of Housing and 
Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
GOODMAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On January 27, 2010, Electronic Data Systems, LLC, filed a notice of appeal in 
connection with a dispute under contract number C-OPC-22807.  On June 10, 2010, 
Electronic Data Systems, LLC, filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice.  Respondent has no 
objection to the dismissal of the appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
ALLAN H. GOODMAN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 3, 2008 
CBCA 646 
BUTTE TIMBERLANDS, LLC,
       Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
       Respondent. 
Todd R. Johnston of Hershner Hunter, LLP, Eugene, OR, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael E. Trow, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Portland, 
OR, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties have filed with the Board an executed settlement agreement, stating that 
any and all claims have been settled, and a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge 

2 CBCA 646
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 14, 2015
CBCA 3962
FUTRON, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Dirk Haire and Jessica Perro of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Erin M. Kriynovich, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have notified the Board that they have settled this matter and request that
the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
___________________________
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 23, 2009 
CBCA 1268 
SERCO, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
E. Sanderson Hoe, Stephen M. Sorett, William T. O’Brien, and Erin B. Sheppard of 
McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Elin M. Dugan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On July 11, 2008, Serco, Inc., timely filed a notice of appeal of a contracting officer’s 
decision.  Details of some of the issues are discussed in the Board’s denial of a Government 
motion for partial summary relief.  Serco, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture , CBCA 1268, 
09-2 BCA ¶ 34,269. The parties have resolved this dispute.  Having received the last of the 
payments pursuant to a settlement agreement, the contractor seeks a dismissal with prejudice. 
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 23, 2019
CBCA 6307
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX; and Donald C. Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Denver, CO, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
On July 22, 2019, the parties, having settled the dispute underlying this appeal, jointly
requested that the Board dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  The parties’ request is granted. 
This appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
_______________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 10, 2008 
CBCA 1197 
CHAMPION BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
INSTITUTE OF MUSEUM AND LIBRARY SERVICES, 
Respondent. 
Carol E. McCallister, President/CEO of Champion Business Services, Inc., Aurora, 
CO, appearing for Appellant. 
Nancy E. Weiss, General Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal was filed on May 23, 2008.  During a conference with the Board on  
June 5, 2008, appellant indicated its intent to withdraw this appeal with prejudice.  The 
Government indicated that it would not oppose appellant’s request.  On June 6, 2008, 
appellant filed its request seeking to withdraw this appeal. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 8, 2015
CBCA 4199
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Ronald D. Sullivan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Austin, TX, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The Department of Veterans Affairs placed an order against a Xerox Corporation
(Xerox) General Services Administration schedule contract for the purchase of certain
equipment, supplies, and services.   Xerox claimed that the agency did not pay $46,279.90 
which it was obligated to pay under the order.  Xerox later appealed from the contracting
officer’s deemed denial of the claim.
Xerox has now notified us that the matter has been resolved and has requested that the
appeal be dismissed with prejudice.


CBCA 4199 2
The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 11, 2008 
CBCA 121, 809, 922 
G&R SERVICE COMPANY, INC.,
                  Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
                  Respondent. 
Lowery T. Gay, Chief Financial Officer of G&R Service Company, Inc., Evans, GA, 
appearing for Appellant. 
Mark R. Simpson, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta, 
GA, counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 23, 2007, G&R Service Company, Inc. submitted an executed release, 
settlement agreement, and request that the Board dismiss these appeals with prejudice. 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 

2 CBCA 121, 809, 922 
Board Judge
______________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 27, 2011 
CBCA 2342 
EOD TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
Respondent.                       
Daniel S. Herzfeld, John E. Jensen, and Matthew J. MacLean of Pillsbury Winthrop 
Shaw Pittman LLP, Mclean, VA counsel for Appellant. 
Dennis J. Gallagher, Assistant Legal Adviser, Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, 
counsel for Respondent. 
WALTERS, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant, EOD Techology, Inc. (EODT), has advised the Board that the appeal has 
been settled by negotiation. Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ settlement, EODT has 
moved that the appeal be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal hereby is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE. 
RICHARD C. WALTERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 13, 2015
CBCA 3432
NICOLI NICHOLAS,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Andrea P. Clark of Downey Brand LLP, Sacramento, CA, counsel for Appellant.
Lierre Green, Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration,
Department of Transportation, Los Angeles, CA, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 10, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this matter, advising the
Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
__________________________
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  August 30, 2023
CBCA 7524, 7681, 7741
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Nancy M. Camardo and Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn,
NY, counsel for Appellant.
Jennifer L. Hedge, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Pittsburgh, PA; and Timothy Saffles, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans,
Redwood City, CA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 29, 2023, the parties advised the Board that they had reached a settlement
and requested that these appeals be dismissed.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 11, 2025
CBCA 8369
THE GILCHRIST LAW FIRM, P.A.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Jacquin P. Gilchrist of The Gilchrist Law Firm, P.A., Charlotte, NC, counsel for
Appellant.
Jessica R. Toplin and Kristen M. Bergh, Office of General Counsel, Justice
Management Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 4, 2025, appellant filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice in
which both parties asked the Board to dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  In the notice,
appellant represented that “the dispute encompassed within [this] appeal ha[d] been
resolved.”  Rule 12(b)(2) permits dismissal of an appeal with prejudice upon appellant’s
motion or the parties’ joint motion.  48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024).  The request is granted,
and this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


CBCA 8369 2
   Beverly M. Russell           
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 17, 2014
CBCA 3391, 3392, 3393, 3394, 3395, 3396
DAVID FRIEDLANDER,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
David Friedlander, pro se, Woodland Hills, CA.
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties advise that they have fully settled the appeals and that the settlement
amount has been paid and received.  Pursuant to the terms of their settlement agreement, they
have jointly moved to dismiss the appeals with prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeals hereby
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
_______________________
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
________________________________ 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 10, 2011 
CBCA 2512 
ARNO V. SPONEMAN, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Arno V. Sponeman, pro se, Granite City, IL. 
Dennis O’Connell, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Kansas City, MO, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 4, 2011, the Board was notified by counsel from the General Services 
Administration (GSA) that the collection activity which was the subject matter of the above 
appeal had been withdrawn by GSA. As a result of the withdrawal, the sums in issue are no 
longer owed nor will they be sought from Mr. Sponeman in this matter. The Board 
understands that the matter is now closed with no further action to be taken. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
April 7, 2016
 
CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO)
In the Matter of SHERI L. ELLIS-SMITH
Shaun Southworth and Terina M. Williams of Southworth PC, Atlanta, GA, appearing
for Claimant.
Jennifer McGuire, Director of Budget and Finance, Albuquerque Service Center,
Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Albuquerque, NM, appearing for Department of
Agriculture.
HYATT, Board Judge.
Claimant, Sheri L. Ellis-Smith, asked the Board to review a decision by the Forest
Service to disallow certain relocation expenses it had authorized in connection with her move
from Bahrain to accept a position with the agency in Ketchikan, Alaska.  The Board granted
the claim.  Sheri L. Ellis-Smith, CBCA 4022-RELO, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,057.  Thereafter, Ms.
Ellis-Smith filed an application, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5
U.S.C. § 504 (2012), for an award of the attorney fees she incurred in conjunction with the
claim.  
In response to the application, the Board directed claimant’s attention to case law
holding that proceedings conducted under the Board’s authority to settle claims involving
expenses incurred by federal civilian employees for official travel and transportation, and for
relocation expenses incident to a transfer of an official duty station, are not encompassed
within the definition of “adversary adjudication” as defined by EAJA.  Dannette Wood,
CBCA 1681-C(1393-RELO), 09-2 BCA ¶ 34,295; Dennis Nielsen, GSBCA 15981-RELO,
03-1 BCA ¶ 32,150 (2002). 

CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO) 2
After reviewing these decisions, claimant elected to withdraw her application for
attorney fees and requests that the matter be dismissed.  Accordingly, the application is
dismissed.
__________________________________
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 20, 2023
CBCA 7024
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Ray Brooks, Vice President of Management Technology, Inc., Clinton, MD,
appearing for Appellant
James F. H. Scott, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER 
The parties have advised that this case has been settled and have filed a joint motion
to dismiss the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED: July 22, 2020
CBCA 6859
RESCARE WORKFORCE SERVICES,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
Mark Douglass, President of ResCare Workforce Services, Louisville, KY, appearing
for Appellant.
José Otero, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor, Washington, DC, counsel
for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On June 24, 2020, the Board docketed this appeal from a contracting officer’s
decision that was issued prior to January 11, 2018. On June 26, 2020, the Board issued an
order directing appellant, ResCare Workforce Services (ResCare), to show cause why the
appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On July 15, 2020, ResCare filed a
request to withdraw its appeal.
ResCare’s request is granted and the appeal isDISMISSED.
Marian E. Sullivan
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART:  February 9, 2026
CBCA 8168
V. LOPEZ JR. & SONS ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Lauren R. Brier, Daniel J. Figuenick III, Kelly A. Kirchgasser, and Matthew T. Healy
of PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC; and Peter R. Ford of PilieroMazza PLLC, Boulder,
CO, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bend,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges LESTER, SHERIDAN, and SULLIVAN.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
On February 6, 2026, appellant, V. Lopez Jr. & Sons Engineering Contractors, Inc.
(V. Lopez Jr. & Sons), and respondent, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), filed a joint
motion requesting the entry of a stipulated judgment in the amount of $775,000, with
payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304
(2018).  V. Lopez Jr. & Sons waives any right it may have to claim for recovery of interest,
attorney fees, costs, and expenses it may have incurred in conjunction with the appeal, except
that if the settlement amount remains unpaid, Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C.
§ 7109, interest will begin to accrue on March 13, 2026, and will continue to accrue until


CBCA 8168 2
payment is made.  The parties have stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, seek
relief from, or appeal the Board’s entry of judgment awarding the stipulated amount to
V. Lopez Jr. & Sons.  See Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2024)).
Decision
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  VA shall pay $775,000 to V. Lopez Jr. & Sons,
in full settlement of CBCA 8168, with CDA interest running from March 13, 2026, if
payment is not yet made, until the payment date.  V. Lopez Jr. & Sons waives any further
right it may have to recover interest, attorney fees, costs, and expenses that it may have
incurred in conjunction with this appeal.
    Marian E. Sullivan         
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
We concur:  
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.            Patricia J. Sheridan      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 22, 2014
CBCA 2943
ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY CONSULTANTS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Respondent.
Peter C. Nwogu, President of Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc., Stone
Mountain, GA, appearing for Appellant.
Charles B. Wallace and Sara T. Zaffina, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the
Interior, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges STERN, McCANN, and KULLBERG.
STERN, Board Judge.
ORDER
This appeal arises from a contract between the Department of the Interior, National
Park Service (Interior) and appellant, Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. (ESCI), entered
into on September 25, 1995.  The complicated history of this matter need not be discussed
since appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal.  Appellant bases its request for dismissal
on a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Court of
Appeals).  Appellant states that the basis for its action before the Board, a challenge to an

CBCA 2943                                                                                                                          2
alleged Government setoff claim against amounts the Government owes appellant, no longer
exists, since the Court of Appeals has dismissed the Government’s claim.  Appellant states
that, based on this decision, it has no evidence to support the gravamen of its appeal. 
Appellant requests that the dismissal be without prejudice, “in the event the Government will
attempt to cook up another bogus setoff claims [sic] in the near future . . . .” 
 
Interior opposes ESCI’s motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice and argues
that the dismissal be with prejudice, given the history of the appeal and the resources
expended by respondent in defending the claim.  Respondent urges the Board, in the
alternative, to grant respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
previously filed by Interior.  The Board finds that, given appellant’s motion and the Board
disposition, as stated herein, addressing Interior’s motion is unnecessary at this juncture. 
Since the appellant concedes that there is no longer a basis for its claim presently
before the Board, it is appropriate to dismiss the claim with prejudice.  The Board will
address the merits of any future appeal if such an appeal is filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________________
 JAMES L. STERN
Board Judge
We concur:
______________________________ _________________________________
R. ANTHONY McCANN H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  February 25, 2015
CBCA 2866
WATERMARK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
John C. Hayes, Jr., and Brian P. Donnelly of Nixon Peabody LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Adria D. Greene, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Atlanta,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 24, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the captioned appeal
because they have settled their dispute through alternative dispute resolution procedures with
the assistance of Judge Candida Steel as Board neutral.  The Board commends the parties
on reaching a settlement.  Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
________________________________
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 24, 2018
CBCA 5548
WASTREN-ENERGX MISSION SUPPORT, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Stephen P. Withee and Daniel F. Edwards of Frost Brown Todd LLC, Columbus, OH,
counsel for Appellant.
Brady L. Jones, III, Office of Chief Counsel, Department of Energy, Cincinnati, OH;
and Laura Roenker Sawyer, Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, Department of Energy,
Lexington, KY, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On August 20, 2018, by notice of dismissal, appellant has advised the Board that this
appeal has been settled and has requested dismissal of the appeal.  Accordingly, this appeal
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Allan H. Goodman   
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 15, 2026
CBCA 8763
CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Alto Lee Teague IV of Engel Hairston-Raulston Brown, PC, Birmingham, AL,
counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Decatur, GA, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On May 14, 2026, the parties jointly requested that this appeal be dismissed with
prejudice.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 19, 2018
CBCA 5969
TOTAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
Respondent.
Jonathan D. Shaffer and Sean K. Griffin of Smith Pachter McWhorter, PLC, Vienna, 
VA, counsel for Appellant.
Mary Schaffer, Lisa Spears, and Ashlee Adams, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Department of the Treasury, Parkersburg, WV, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
Representing that they have executed a settlement agreement, on June 13, 2018, the
parties jointly moved to dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned appeal.  Accordingly,
the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
  Patricia J. Sheridan       
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge