GRANTED IN PART:  December 15, 2009 
CBCA 1405 
INTECH WORLDWIDE LP, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
Respondent. 
George M. Coburn, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Thomas D. Dinackus, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, 
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges  SOMERS , BORWICK, and McCANN . 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
On December 7, 2009, the parties moved for an amendment to our judgment of 
$362,376.50 , dated October 29, 2009, in this appeal. The original stipulation resulting in 
that judgment contemplated that of the $362,376.50 settlement amount, respondent would 
pay $184,059.50 from  project funds and the remainder--including interest--from the 
judgment fund.  
Subsequent to the entry of judgment, respondent learned that some of the program 
funds that respondent intended to use to pay the agreed-upon settlement amount had 
expired and could not be used for the purpose intended.  Consequently, the parties desire 
a judgment that would add $2700 to be paid from the judgment fund and have submitted a 
new stipulation reflecting the adjusted amounts.  For good cause shown, the parties’ 

  
  
     
     
    
    
  
2 CBCA 1405 
motion is granted, and the Board amends the judgment accordingly.  Board Rules 26(a), 
27(a), (48 CFR 6101.26(a), 6101.27(a) (2008)).  The amended stipulation, submitted 
pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), provides in pertinent part: 
The parties have agreed to a full and final settlement of this appeal upon the 
following terms.   Respondent will pay appellant $362,376.50, plus interest 
pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 612 [sic], as follows: 
Respondent will pay appellant interest upon $222,390, from August 8, 2008 
through the date appellant receives payment.  Respondent will pay appellant 
interest upon $139,986.50, from April 28, 2009 through the date appellant 
receives payment.  
Respondent has issued two contract modifications that will pay appellant 
$181,359.50 of the principal. Appellant has submitted invoices to obtain 
this amount and respondent has paid them.  The remainder of the settlement 
is to be paid from the Judgment Fund.  
Accordingly, the parties stipulate to entry of judgment as follows: 
1. Payment of $181,017 of principal; 
2. Payment of interest, pursuant to the CDA, upon $181,359.50, from 
August 8, 2008 through the dates appellant has received payment from the 
Department of State pursuant to Contract Modifications Two and Three; 
3. Payment of interest, pursuant to the CDA, upon $41,030.50, from 
August 8, 2008 through the date appellant receives payment from the 
Judgment Fund; and 
4. Payment of interest, pursuant to the CDA, upon $139,986.50, from 
April 28, 2009, through the date appellant receives payment from the 
Judgment Fund. 
The parties state they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s 
decision and will not appeal the decision. 
The Board adopts the parties’ stipulation by decision.  Pursuant to Board Rule 
25(b), the Board’s decision is an adjudication on the merits.  

    
 
   
    
3 CBCA 1405 
Amended Decision 
This appeal is GRANTED IN PART . In accordance with the stipulation, the total 
amount due the contractor is $362,376.50, plus interest.   41 U.S.C. § 611 (2006).  Of that 
amount, respondent will pay $181,359.50 through contract modifications; $181,017 shall 
be paid through the Judgment Fund.   Interest on $181,359.50 shall be paid from the 
Judgment Fund pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act from August 8, 2008, through the 
dates appellant has received payment from respondent through contract modifications. 
Interest on $41,030.50 shall be paid from the Judgment Fund pursuant to the Contract 
Disputes Act from August 8, 2008, through the date appellant receives payment from the 
Judgment Fund. Interest on $139,986.50 shall be paid from the Judgment Fund pursuant 
to the Contract Disputes Act from April 28, 2009, through the date appellant receives 
payment from the Judgment Fund.  Payment is to be made in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 
1304. 
_______________________________ 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
_______________________________ ________________________________ 
R. ANTHONY McCANN JERI K. SOMERS 
Board Judge Board Judge