Kmisener/CBCA_Full huggingface dataset:
GRANTED IN PART: August 2, 2012 
CBCA 2532 
REVA MURPHY ASSOCIATES, INC. 
– AMERICAN INCORPORATED JOINT VENTURE, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Dennis C. Ehlers, Laurence Schor, and Michael K. Koger of Asmar, Schor & 
McKenna, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Kate Gorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), POLLACK , and DRUMMOND . 
DANIELS , Board Judge. 
Reva Murphy Associates, Inc. – American Incorporated Joint Venture (the Joint 
Venture) claimed that it was entitled to $1,244,251 and 309 additional calendar days of 
performance time under a contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to remodel 
portions of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Fresno, California. A VA contracting 
officer denied most of the claim, awarding only $70,000, and the Joint Venture appealed that 
decision to the Board. 
The parties have now resolved their differences and have submitted to the Board a 
Joint Motion for Judgment on Stipulated Settlement. In the motion, the parties ask the Board 

 
                 
           
              
            
         
                
                
                
         
            
              
              
     
                   
               
              
              
_________________________ 
  
 
 
_________________________ _________________________ 
    
  
2 CBCA 2532 
to make an award to the Joint Venture in the amount of $500,000 (in addition to the $70,000 
previously paid pursuant to the contracting officer’s decision) as “full and complete 
compensation for all costs, direct and indirect, including but not limited to impact, on both 
changed and unchanged work associated with claim CBCA No. 2532, under Contract No. 
V261C-2821.” The parties have also asked us to incorporate the settlement agreement into 
our decision. Under this agreement, if payment is not made within ninety days of the date 
of this decision, interest will also be paid on the $500,000, at rates prescribed by the Contract 
Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (Supp. IV 2011), from the ninety-first day after the date of 
the decision until full payment of the $500,000 is made. 
The parties have stipulated that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, 
the Board decision that makes the requested award, and that they will not appeal that 
decision. 
Decision 
The motion is granted. The appeal is GRANTED IN PART . The Department of 
Veterans Affairs shall pay to Reva Murphy Associates, Inc. – American Incorporated Joint 
Venture the sum of $500,000. If payment is not made within ninety days of the date of this 
decision, the VA will also pay to the Joint Venture interest on the $500,000, at rates 
prescribed by the Contract Disputes Act, from the ninety-first day after the date of the 
decision until full payment of the $500,000 is made. Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) 
(2011)). 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge 
We concur: 
HOWARD A. POLLACK JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge Board Judge
_______________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 8, 2009 
CBCA 1379 
MRR PROPERTIES, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Gary W. Dubin, Cleveland, OH, counsel for Appellant. 
Scott F. McCleary, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Chicago, IL, counsel for Respondent. 
STEEL , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On December 4, 2008, the Government submitted a motion to dismiss the above-
captioned claim on the basis of a settlement agreement signed and submitted to the Board by 
both parties.  The parties have agreed to a sum which settles all claims and disputes relating 
to the lease in question.  The matter of attorney fees has also been resolved between the 
parties. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
CANDIDA S. STEEL 
Board Judge
__________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 3, 2010 
CBCA 1683 
SYSTEMS DESIGN, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Andrew Mohr and Victor G. Klingelhofer of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
McCANN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 7, 2009, Systems Design, Inc. filed a notice of appeal in connection with 
a dispute under contract number GS-29F-T0003, for design, layout, space planning, and 
project management services for the Department of Homeland Security.  On May 27, 2010, 
Systems Design, Inc. filed a withdrawal of the appeal and requested it be dismissed with 
prejudice, with the consent of respondent. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
R. ANTHONY McCANN 
Board Judge
____________________________ 
DISMISSED:  February 17, 2010 
CBCA 1506 
SHILOH TEXAS PROPERTIES, LTD., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Paul A. Debolt of Venable LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 4, 2010, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement of this 
matter and moved to dismiss the appeal.  Pursuant to the agreement of the parties and 
Rule 12(c), this appeal is DISMISSED . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 30, 2008 
CBCA 1019 
PACIFICARE ASIA PACIFIC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 
Respondent. 
David W. Klaudt of Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, Dallas, TX, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Debra Petcove, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SHERIDAN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
This appeal arose out of a dispute concerning final decision 182 of the United States 
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) dated October 2, 2007.  PacificCare Asia Pacific 
disputes the OPM Inspector General’s finding in final audit report 1C-JK-00-04-031, 
specifically that PacificCare Asia Pacific used inappropriate overage dependent children’s 
loading charges to the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program in 1999, 2000, 
and 2001, in the amount of $473,469. 

                                                             
2 CBCA 1169 
On July 17, 2008, appellant’s counsel contacted the Board informing it that 
PacificCare Asia Pacific and OPM had reached a settlement with regard to the above-
captioned matter, and jointly requested that CBCA 1019 be dismissed with prejudice. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge
______________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 22, 2012 
CBCA 2102 
MURRAY-BENJAMIN ELECTRIC CO., L.P., 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
William R. Hinchman and William J. Clements of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg 
LLP, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant. 
Nathan C. Guerrero, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 3, 2010, the Board received a notice of appeal from Murray-Benjamin 
Electric Co., L.P. (contractor) concerning its multiple award schedule contract, GS-35F­
0088N, with the General Services Administration (agency). Following an audit and concerns 
about the price reduction clause, a contracting officer determined that the contractor was 
required to repay the agency $364,562.12. The contractor timely pursued relief at this Board. 
41 U.S.C.A. §§ 7101-7109 (West 2011). On February 21, 2012, the Board received from the 
parties a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice; the parties have settled their dispute. 
The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: July 18, 2019
CBCA 6121
ARCHER WESTERN CONSTRUCTION, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Larry W. Caudle, Jr. and Jonathan J. Straw of Kraftson Caudle, McLean, VA, counsel
for Appellant.
Kelly Y. Burnell, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, SULLIVAN, and CHADWICK.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
On July 17, 2019, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for a stipulated
award.  The parties request that the Board enter judgment in the amount of $410,000, with
payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31
U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  The amount includes any costs, interest, and attorney fees to which
appellant, Archer Western Construction, LLC, may be entitled.  The parties have agreed that
they will not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision.  


CBCA 6121 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
motion, the Board awards Archer Western Construction, LLC, the stipulated judgment
amount of $410,000.  
    Marian E. Sullivan       
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
We concur:
    Allan H. Goodman            Kyle Chadwick               
ALLAN H. GOODMAN KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 30, 2013
CBCA 3301
ABM SERVICES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Bryant S. Banes and Stormy N. Hendershott of Neel, Hooper & Banes, P.C., Houston,
TX, counsel for Appellant.
Leonard E. Lucas III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
ORDER
The General Services Administration (GSA) contracted with ABM Services, Inc.
(ABM) for the provision of operation and maintenance services for the Chet Holifield
Federal Building in Laguna Niguel, California.  ABM maintains that GSA did not pay for
the final month of services ABM provided under the contract.  GSA contends that it did not
make payment in response to ABM’s final invoice because it had previously paid the
contractor more than the total contract amount.


CBCA 3301 2
The parties have now settled their dispute and have jointly moved the Board to dismiss
with prejudice ABM’s appeal of the contracting officer’s decision which denied the
contractor’s claim.  
The motion is granted.  The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
___________________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 31, 2010 
CBCA 876, 1345 
D & B CONSTRUCTION, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Stephen P. Kauffman of Skeen & Kauffman, LLP, Baltimore, MD, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Tracy Downing,, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Augusta, GA; and Charlma J. Quarles and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General 
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
GILMORE , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On August 15, 2007, and September 18, 2008, D & B Construction, Inc. filed notices 
of appeal in connection with disputes under contract number V247C-0441-8(a).  On 
March 30, 2010, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice, stating that the 
appeals had been settled. 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
BERYL S. GILMORE 
Board Judge
___________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 30, 2009 
CBCA 1066 
AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 
Appellant, 
v. 
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 
Respondent. 
Joseph G. Billings of Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Bowie, MD, counsel for Appellant. 
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Appellant appealed to the Board from the contracting officer’s failure to issue a 
decision.  On March 4, 2008, the Board ordered the contracting officer to issue a decision. 
Subsequently, such a decision was issued. 
Appellant has notified the Board that it does not wish to pursue the appeal. 
Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  January 18, 2023
CBCA 7194
LTL ENTERPRISES, LLC dba LTL FORESTRY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Thane Johnson of Johnson, Berg & Saxby, PLLP, Kalispell, MT, counsel for
Appellant.
Jennifer T. Newbold, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Missoula, MT, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant requested, with respondent’s concurrence, that this appeal be dismissed
without prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART; 
DISMISSED IN PART:  November 6, 2020
CBCA 6501
OAK HILLS PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Seamus Curley of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
James Scott and Jessica Gunzel, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, ZISCHKAU, and CHADWICK. 
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
Respondent, the General Services Administration, offset the amount of $54,667.36
from its lease payment to appellant, Oak Hills Property Associates, LLC, to recoup real
estate taxes GSA alleged it had wrongly paid.  Appellant has moved for summary judgment
in the amount of the offset claiming that the government’s right to offset is barred by the
Contract Dispute Act’s (CDA) six-year statute of limitations, 41 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(4)(A)
(2018).  Appellant also moved for an award of interest in the amount of $3245.23 from the
date of the offset until November 15, 2018, the date appellant submitted its CDA claim.  


CBCA 6501 2
GSA does not oppose this motion, except to challenge appellant’s claim for $3254.23
in other than CDA interest.1  GSA states that it cannot produce any documentary evidence
that a contracting officer asserted a claim to withhold the funds and resolve the issues of tax
liability and of damages within the CDA limitations period.  Based on the Board’s decision
in 1000-1100 Wilson Owner, LLC v. General Services Administration, CBCA 6506, 20-1
BCA ¶ 37,642, which involved almost identical facts to this case, GSA’s claim for
$54,667.36 is, therefore, barred by the CDA statute of limitations.  
On October 2, 2020, appellant filed a notice withdrawing its claim in this appeal for
$15,352.18 in rent GSA failed to pay appellant in order to recoup taxes for which GSA
alleged it had wrongly reimbursed appellant (the short pay claim).  GSA did not oppose
appellant’s decision to withdraw the short pay claim.   
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART appellant’s motion for summary judgment and enters
judgment for appellant in the amount of $54,667.36, plus CDA interest to run from
November 15, 2018.  The short pay claim is DISMISSED, and only appellant’s claim for
other than CDA interest remains to be decided in this appeal.
 
    Erica S. Beardsley       
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
We concur:
  Jonathan D. Zischkau         Kyle Chadwick             
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge Board Judge
1  The parties are currently briefing for the Board the issue of appellant’s
entitlement to other than CDA interest.
_____________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 18, 2007 
CBCA 74 
ENVIROSOLVE, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
 
Respondent. 
Carolyn Callaway, Albuquerque, New Mexico, counsel for Appellant. 
James E. Hicks, Office of Chief Counsel, Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On April 6, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal requesting that the Board 
dismiss the appeal with prejudice, as the case had been settled. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 19, 2021
CBCA 6798
EPIK INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Douglas L. Patin and Lee-Ann C. Brown of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.
Erin M. Kriynovich, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On January 11, 2021, the parties jointly moved to have this appeal dismissed without
prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant
to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2019)).
Patricia J. Sheridan
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
______________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 7, 2011 
CBCA 2302 
GARNER MULTIMEDIA, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
William T. Welch of General Counsel, PC, McLean, VA, counsel for Appellant. 
L. T. Burleson, Philip Kauffman, and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of the General 
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
VERGILIO , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On February 10, 2011, the Board received from Garner Multimedia, Inc. (contractor) 
a notice of appeal, docketed as CBCA 2302, disputing the termination for default of a task 
order, 101-J07217, issued by the respondent, the Department of Veterans Affairs (agency). 
The contractor pursues relief at this Board under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as 
amended. 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (previously 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006)). 
On July 6, 2011, the Board received a request for a dismissal with prejudice in which 
the contractor states that the contracting officer has rescinded the termination, while the 
agency has received all deliverables under the task order in dispute. The Board DISMISSES 
WITH PREJUDICE this appeal. 
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 26, 2013
CBCA 2407
SHAW AREVA MOX SERVICES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Mark J. Meagher and Joseph G. Martinez of McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP,
Denver, CO, counsel for Appellant.
Timothy P. Fischer, Savannah River Site Office, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy, Aiken, SC; and Keith R. Landolt, Office of the
General Counsel, National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Shaw AREVA MOX Services, LLC appealed a Department of Energy contracting
officer’s decision demanding repayment of money which had been reimbursed under a cost-
type contract.  The contracting officer believed that the costs had been incurred unreasonably.
The parties have reached a settlement in the case and have jointly moved the Board
to dismiss it with prejudice.


CBCA 2407 2
Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 20, 2017
CBCA 5516
COMPUCRAFT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Thomas J. Wingfield, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant. 
Kristi Singleton and Elyssa Tanenbaum, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of appellant’s motion for dismissal, filed on
December 19, 2017, in the above-referenced case.  Appellant states that the parties have
reached a settlement  and requests that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 


CBCA 5516 2
In accordance with appellant’s request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
___________________________
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  January 23, 2025
CBCA 8113
OAKMONT CONTRACTING LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
John M. Cook and David Timm of Fox Rothschild LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Brett A. Pisciotta, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
At the request of the parties, who resolved the dispute, this appeal is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024)).
     Joseph  A. Vergilio          
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 3, 2025
CBCA 8304
KPAUL PROPERTIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Marvelle L. Butler of The Butler Law Firm, LLC, Bethesda, MD, counsel for
Appellant.
Tyler D. Ellis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
NEWSOM, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 7, 2025, the Government reported that the parties have settled this appeal
and moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  In a submission docketed on February 28,
2025, appellant concurred with the motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.  Accordingly
this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Elizabeth W. Newsom     
ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: April 8, 2020
CBCA 6648
PRECISE MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Joseph A. Camardo, Jr. of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for
Appellant.
Mary A. Mitchell, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Houston, TX, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 8, 2020, appellant, Precise Management, LLC (Precise), moved to dismiss
its appeal without prejudice. Precise represented that respondent, Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), did not oppose the motion.
Precise’s motion is granted. The appeal isDISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Marian E. Sullivan
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
________________________ 
DISMISSED: January 11, 2011 
CBCA 1811 
NEALS JANITORIAL SERVICE, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 
Respondent. 
Nancy M. Camardo of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for 
Appellant. 
Matthew V. Edwards, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, San Diego, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On January 5, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion for dismissal. Pursuant to the 
agreement of the parties and Rule 12(c), this appeal is DISMISSED . 
Anthony S. Borwick 
Board Judge
____________________________ 
  
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 8, 2011 
CBCA 986 
DeLEON INDUSTRIES, LLC, 
Appellant, 
v.
 
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
 
Respondent. 
Christopher C. Sharp of Sharp Law Firm, P.A., Lauderhill, FL, counsel for Appellant. 
Karen L. Mulcahy, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bay 
Pines, FL, counsel for Respondent. 
DANIELS , Board Judge (Chairman). 
ORDER 
Appellant, DeLeon Industries, LLC, appealed a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
contracting officer’s decision denying its claim under a contract for the replacement of 
windows at a VA facility in Miami, Florida. 
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, stating the parties 
have settled its claim. 
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
STEPHEN M. DANIELS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 6, 2023
CBCA 7659
APOGEE-SSU JOINT VENTURE, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Benjamin N. Thompson and Mary Kate Gladstone of Wyrick Robbins Yates &
Ponton LLP, Raleigh, NC, counsel for Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Regner, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions,
Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.
ZISCHKAU, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 5, 2023, appellant filed a consent motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice after having entered into a settlement agreement resolving all matters in the appeal. 
The Board commends the parties on their settlement of the dispute.  Accordingly, we
DISMISS this appeal WITH PREJUDICE.
  Jonathan D. Zischkau    
JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 17, 2020
CBCA 6679
CLEARVIEW SAN ANTONIO GSA, LP,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Brett Field of Stromberg Stock, PLLC, Dallas, TX, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
On April 16, 2020, during a telephone conference with the Board, counsel jointly
withdrew their previous joint request for a judgment on a stipulated settlement and verbally
moved to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. The motion is granted, and this appeal is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Allan H. Goodman
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 15, 2016 
CBCA 5044
ALLAGASHGROUP, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
C. Thomas Busch, President and Chief Executive Officer of AllagashGroup, LLC,
Columbia, MD, appearing for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA, counsel for Respondent.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The Board is in receipt of the parties’ joint motion to dismiss, filed on December 14,
2016, in the above referenced case.  The parties state that respondent has fulfilled its
settlement obligations and request that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice. 


CBCA 5044 2
In accordance with the parties’ request, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.  
___________________________
MARIAN E. SULLIVAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 31, 2016
CBCA 3656, 3657, 3659, 3664, 3665
DOUGLAS P. FLEMING, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Fred A. Mendicino and Dylan M. Marck of Faughnan Mendicino PLLC, Dulles, VA,
counsel for Appellant.
David W. Altieri, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Syracuse, NY, counsel for Respondent.
ORDER
During a hearing held on November 16, 2015, appellant, Douglas P. Fleming, LLC,
withdrew CBCA 3656, 3657, 3659, 3664, and 3665.  Respondent, the Department of
Veterans Affairs, raised no objection to the withdrawal.  Accordingly, CBCA 3656, 3657,
3659, 3664, and 3665 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  CBCA 3655, 3658, 3660,
3661, 3662, 3663, and 3666, remain on the Board’s docket.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 4, 2010 
CBCA 1782 
RKR ENTERPRISES, 
Appellant, 
v. 
TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 
Respondent. 
Raghu K. Raghavan, Principal of RKR Enterprises, Rego Park, NY, appearing for 
Appellant. 
James A. Wilderotter and Enoh T. Ebong, Office of General Counsel, Trade and 
Development Agency, Arlington, VA, counsel for Respondent. 
DRUMMOND , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating they had settled this 
matter and the case is now moot. 
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JEROME M. DRUMMOND 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 4, 2011 
CBCA 2221, 2226, 2227 
DATANAMICS, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 
Respondent. 
Judah Lifschitz and Laura C. Fraher of Shapiro Lifschitz & Schram, P.C., 
Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant. 
Lori R. Larson and John T. Kirsch, Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue 
Service, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
SOMERS , Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On November 22, 2010, Datanamics, Inc. appealed the final decision of a Department 
of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service contracting officer denying Datanamics’ request 
for equitable adjustment under task order numbers TIRNO-03-K-00498, 
TIRNO-07-K-00443, and TIRNO-06-K-00356 for webRTS/IPS operations maintenance and 
enhancement. 
On February 3, 2011, Datanamics filed a motion to dismiss these appeals with 
prejudice, stating that the parties have executed a settlement agreement and that respondent 
consents to the motion. 

      
___________________________ 
  
 
2 CBCA 2221, 2226, 2227
 
Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
 
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  October 7, 2024
CBCA 8216
GRANT THORNTON LLP,
Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
Alexander J. Brittin of Brittin Law Group, PLLC, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
Matthew J. Ruane, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
NEWSOM, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pursuant to the appellant’s voluntary motion to dismiss this claim with prejudice,
dated October 7, 2024, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Elizabeth W. Newsom     
ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 10, 2021
CBCA 6359
THE BOEING COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
Scott M. McCaleb, Jon W. Burd, and Gary S. Ward of Wiley Rein LLP, Washington,
DC, counsel for Appellant.
Brady L. Jones, III, Rachna M. Talwar, and Sky W. Smith, Office of Chief Counsel,
Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center, Department of Energy,
Cincinnati, OH, counsel for Respondent.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 9, 2021, appellant requested that this appeal be dismissed with
prejudice.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    H. Chuck Kullberg         
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
GRANTED: July 25, 2014
CBCA 3515
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Andrew K. Wible and Andrew W. Mohr of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Michael J. Noble, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, VERGILIO, and McCANN.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
On August 29, 2013, the Board received from Sharp Electronics Corporation
(contractor) a notice of appeal concerning a purchase order, W91ZLK-06-0028, placed by
the Army Contracting Authority, Aberdeen Proving Ground (ordering agency) against its
schedule contract, GS-25F-0037M, with the General Services Administration (respondent).
The contractor provided lease, maintenance, and service of copier and multifunction
equipment.  It seeks what it describes as early termination charges, said to be payment due
under the purchase order and schedule contract when the ordering agency terminated the
agreement six months prior to the end of the performance period.  Following a claim to a
contracting officer of the ordering agency and an ultimate determination from the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the ordering agency’s contracting officer lacked authority
to resolve the claim, Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, 707 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2013),


CBCA 3515 2
the contractor here appealed the ultimate denial of its claim by the respondent’s contracting
officer.  The contractor seeks $67,928.63, plus interest from the date of filing its initial claim.
The contractor and respondent have resolved the dispute and have agreed to a
stipulated judgment.  The Government shall pay the contractor  $67,928.63, plus applicable
interest under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012), calculated from
January 14, 2011 (the date of the original claim to the ordering agency contracting officer). 
The parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and will not
appeal the decision.  The parties note that the Government shall utilize the permanent
indefinite judgment fund.  31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 7108.
Decision
Accordingly, the Board GRANTS the appeal.  The contractor is to receive
$67,928.63, plus applicable interest under the Contract Disputes Act calculated from
January 14, 2011.
______________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
We concur:
_____________________________ ______________________________
JERI K. SOMERS R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: September 17, 2013
CBCA 3244
BLUE YONDER, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Andrew K. Wible and Victor G. Klingelhofer of Cohen Mohr LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Brian R. Reed, Kristin Langwell, and D. Brent Pope, Office of Regional Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs, Charleston, IL, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), STERN, and SHERIDAN.
DANIELS, Board Judge.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracted with Blue Yonder, Inc. (Blue
Yonder), to construct two buildings at a VA medical facility in North Chicago, Illinois.  Blue
Yonder claimed that due to delays caused by the VA, it was entitled to be paid $308,377.35
in extended general conditions costs.
Following mediation of the dispute by a Board judge, the parties to this appeal have
filed a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment.  In this stipulation, the parties ask the Board to
enter judgment in favor of Blue Yonder in the amount of $220,000.  Each party stipulates


CBCA 3244 2
that it will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a decision which makes this award, and
will not appeal such a decision.
Decision
The parties’ request is granted.  The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.  The
Department of Veterans Affairs shall pay to Blue Yonder, Inc. the sum of $220,000.  Rule
25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2012)).  Payment shall be paid from the Government’s permanent
indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006).
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
We concur:
_________________________ _________________________
JAMES L. STERN PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge Board Judge
________________________________ 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  May 3, 2012 
CBCA 2372 
VILLALBA CANNING COMPANY, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Milton R. Gonzalez, Executive Vice President of Villalba Canning Company, 
Guaynabo, PR, appearing for Appellant. 
Michael Gurwitz, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
ORDER 
The parties have executed a settlement agreement resolving all claims and related 
matters under this appeal and move for dismissal with prejudice. In accordance with the 
settlement agreement, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  March 25, 2026
CBCA 8190
PROLOGIS, L.P.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Shawn B. Rediger of Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC, Seattle, WA, counsel for
Appellant.
Brett A. Pisciotta, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
NEWSOM, Board Judge.
ORDER
On March 23, 2026, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice
based on their settlement.  Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (2024)), the
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Elizabeth W. Newsom     
ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  April 1, 2026
CBCA 8209
VIAKORP CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Zakaria Ouahmane, Chief Executive Officer and President of Viakorp Corporation,
Williamsburg, VA, appearing for Appellant.
Timothy M. Saffles, Office of General Counsel, District Contract Law Group,
Redwood City, CA; and Jared M. Levin, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Brockton, MA, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have entered into a settlement agreement and stipulate to a dismissal with
prejudice of this appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
    Allan H. Goodman        
ALLAN H. GOODMAN
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: August 9, 2019 
CBCA 5514
BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
David H. Horton, Daphne, AL, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS (Chair), BEARDSLEY, and SHERIDAN. 
SOMERS, Board Judge.
On August 5, 2019, the parties submitted to the Board a joint motion for a stipulated
award.  The parties request that the Board enter judgment in the amount of $253,981.39, with
payment to be made through the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31
U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  The amount includes any costs, interest, and attorney fees to which
appellant, BES Design/Build, LLC, may be entitled.  The parties have agreed that they will
not seek appeal of, reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision.  


CBCA 5514 2
Decision
The Board GRANTS IN PART this appeal.  In accordance with the parties’ joint
motion, the Board awards BES Design/Build, LLC, the stipulated judgment amount of
$253,981.39. 
    Jeri Kaylene Somers       
JERI KAYLENE SOMERS
Board Judge
We concur: 
    Erica S. Beardsley              Patricia J. Sheridan      
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN 
Board Judge Board Judge
____________________________ 
 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 30, 2008 
CBCA 961 
GROUP HEALTH, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 
Respondent. 
Kenneth M. Bruntel and Rogelyn D. McLean of Crowell & Moring LLP, 
Washington, DC, counsel for  Appellant. 
R. Alan Miller, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, 
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
STERN, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
Group Health, Inc. (GHI) appealed the final decision of the contracting officer of the 
United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM), demanding that GHI remit 
$3,772,057 in overcharges to OPM.  After the appeal was filed, the parties entered into 
settlement discussions.  These negotiations resulted in withdrawal of the final decision and 
a request for dismissal of the appeal. 
The appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . 
JAMES L. STERN 
Board Judge
GRANTED: November 19, 2015
CBCA 3058, 5022
ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC and PRIMEAUX HEALTH
STRATEGIES, LLC,
Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Elizabeth A. Ferrell of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellants.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, KULLBERG, and ZISCHKAU.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
On November 6, 2015, the parties submitted to the Board a joint stipulation of
settlement and motion for judgment.  The parties requested that the Board enter judgment for
appellants in the amount of $2,565,222.17, plus interest under the Contract Disputes Act
(CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012), from June 5, 2015, and that payment be made through the
judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 and 41 U.S.C. § 7108.  The parties have
agreed that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision, and


CBCA 3058, 5022 2
each party will be responsible for its costs, attorney fees, and expenses incurred in the
litigation of this appeal. 
Decision
The Board GRANTS these appeals.  The Government shall pay appellants the sum
of $2,565,222.17 plus interest in accordance with the CDA from June 5, 2015.  Payment may
be made from the judgement fund.  31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 7108.
______________________
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
We concur:
_______________________ ________________________
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge
______________________________ 
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  June 15, 2010 
CBCA 1088 
 HAMBONE CONSTRUCTION, INC., 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 
Respondent. 
Joshua J. Divine of Reese, Smalley, Wiseman & Schweitzer, LLP, Redding, CA, 
counsel for Appellant. 
Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San 
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent. 
POLLACK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
By letter dated June 3, 2010, Hambone Construction, Inc. (appellant) asked the Board 
to dismiss the above-captioned appeal with prejudice, pursuant to an attached settlement 
agreement executed by the parties.  Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH 
PREJUDICE. 
HOWARD A. POLLACK 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  July 11, 2019
CBCA 5848
 
UNITED FACILITY SERVICES CORPORATION
 dba EASTCO BUILDING SERVICES, 
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Adam Berman of Adam Berman & Associates, New York, NY, counsel for Appellant. 
Kristi Singleton, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge. 
ORDER
On July 10, 2019, the parties, having settled the dispute underlying this appeal,
requested that the Board dismiss this appeal with prejudice.  In accord with that request, this
appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs,
expenses, and attorney fees.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. 
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 19, 2020
CBCA 6587
BURMAN CONSTRUCTION LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Brett W. Johnson and Michael Calvanico of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ,
counsel for Appellant.
Aleia Barlow and Adrienne Zelnick Schwartz, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
ORDER
On February 18, 2020, appellant filed a notice of settlement and request for dismissal
of the appeal with prejudice.  The parties executed a settlement agreement and have fulfilled
their obligations under the agreement.  Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
   Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE:  September 7, 2018
CBCA 6219
EDMOND SCIENTIFIC COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman, LLP, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Patricia J. McDaniel, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Austin, TX; and Frank V. DiNicola, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Eatontown, NJ, counsel for Respondent.
LESTER, Board Judge.
ORDER
Pending before the Board is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal with
prejudice, filed September 6, 2018, following the parties’ settlement of the dispute
underlying this appeal.  The motion is granted.  This appeal is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
    Harold D. Lester, Jr.      
HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 25, 2020
CBCA 6459, 6681
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Neil S. Deol, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur,
GA; and Donald Mobly, Office of General Counsel, Denver, CO, Department of Veterans
Affairs, counsel for Respondent.
CHADWICK, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties resolved this case and jointly request dismissal with prejudice. 
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
     Kyle Chadwick               
KYLE CHADWICK
Board Judge
GRANTED IN PART: April 10, 2018
CBCA 5828
HERMAN CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., 
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Jessica L. Mulvaney and William L. Bruckner of Bruckner Law Firm, APC, San
Diego, CA, counsel for Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY, RUSSELL, and O’ROURKE.  
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
On August 24, 2017, appellant, Herman Construction Group, Inc., filed this appeal
arising from respondent, Department of Veterans Affairs, contracting officer’s final decision
denying appellant’s certified claim in the amount of $235,237. 
On April 2, 2018, pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2017)) and the
terms of a settlement agreement, the parties jointly moved for a judgment based on a
stipulated settlement in the amount of $175,000, and they indicated that the amount would
be paid from the judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).  
The parties also agreed that Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”) interest on the amount
of $175,000 would accrue on April 30, 2018, if the settlement amount had not been paid by
that date, and the interest would continue to accrue until payment was made.  Appellant


CBCA 5828 2
waived any further right to recover interest or for attorney fees, costs, or expenses incurred
in conjunction with the appeal.  In addition, the parties stated that they will not seek
reconsideration of, or relief from, this decision, and will not appeal it.  
Decision
Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion for judgment on stipulated settlement, the Board
GRANTS the appeal IN PART.  Appellant is awarded a total of $175,000, with additional
interest, if any, that may accrue pursuant to the agreement of the parties. 
    Erica S. Beardsley          
ERICA S. BEARDSLEY
Board Judge
We concur:
   Beverly M. Russell          Kathleen J. O’Rourke     
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE
Board Judge Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 15, 2020
CBCA 6608, 6618
UNLIMITED SERVICE ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Justin T. Huffman of Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
Hank W. Askins III, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Charleston, SC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
ORDER
The parties have resolved these disputes. As they request, the Board DISMISSES
WITH PREJUDICE the appeals.
Joseph A. Vergilio
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 1, 2016
CBCA 4756, 4922
S.A. SCHUYLER & SONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Christopher W. Peterman, Roseburg, OR, counsel for Appellant.
Zoey L. Kohn, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Portland,
OR, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
ORDER
 
On February 25, 2016, representing that they have reached a mutually agreeable
settlement in these matters, the parties jointly moved to dismiss the above-captioned appeals
with prejudice.  Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
                                                             
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 27, 2015
CBCA 3952
GRIMM’S GARDENS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
Paul H. Sanderford of Sanderford & Carroll, PC, Temple, TX, counsel for Appellant.
Daniel A. Bowen and Lindsay Middaugh, Office of the General Counsel, Department
of Agriculture, Temple, TX, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
ORDER
Appellant, Grimm’s Gardens, LLC, was awarded a contract by the Department of
Agriculture for the removal of a variety of vegetation and woody species from training areas
within Fort Hood, Texas, to improve training areas.  Appellant filed an appeal, stating that
it incurred significant losses in the performance of the contract.   
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the parties have entered into a
settlement agreement which disposes of all claims involved and requesting the appeal be
dismissed with prejudice.

CBCA 3952 2
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
____________________________ 
                         
                         
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE:  October 6, 2009 
CBCA 1725 
WINNERS INK & OFFICE SUPPLY, 
Appellant, 
v. 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 
Respondent. 
Diane McFadden, Chief Financial Officer, Winners Ink & Office Supply, Palm 
Springs, CA, appearing for Appellant. 
Cheryl S. Mpande, Office of General Counsel, Department of Health and Human 
Services, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. 
BORWICK, Board Judge. 
ORDER 
On September 28, 2009, the appellant asked that the appeal be dismissed.  A 
scheduled conference call was held on October 5, 2009, where the parties agreed that the 
appeal should be dismissed without prejudice.  Pursuant to Rule 12(d), this appeal is 
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . 
ANTHONY S. BORWICK 
Board Judge