ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 
Appeal of -- ) 
) 
EG&G Defense Materials, Inc. ) 
) 
Under Contract No. DACA87-89-C-0076 ) 
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 
ASBCA No. 60276 
Terry L. Elling, Esq. 
Elizabeth N. Jochum, Esq. 
Holland & Knight LLP 
Tysons Comer, VA 
Raymond 
M. Saunders, Esq. 
Army Chief Trial Attorney 
MAJ Travis P. Sommer, JA 
Trial Attorney 
SUMMARY BINDING DECISION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON 
By ADR agreement approved by the Board on 6 April 2016, the parties requested 
that this appeal be decided by a "bench decision" at the conclusion of the ADR 
proceeding. This summary decision will only address the reasonableness and 
allowability of appellant's compensation cost at issue in this appeal. The parties had also 
requested that the Board address whether the government's claim for contract years 2004 
and 2005 is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. However, at the hearing, 
appellant conceded that the statute of limitations was not applicable in the instant appeal 
(tr. 1/9). This decision has no value as precedent, cannot be cited in any other proceeding 
and cannot be appealed. It may not be set aside except for fraud. 
DECISION 
The Board finds that appellant's compensation costs for contract years ,2004 and 
2005 are reasonable and allowable. Accordingly, the appeal is sustained. 
Dated: 10 May 2016 
OWEN C. WILSON 
Administrative Judge 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60276, Appeal of EG&G 
Defense Materials, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 
Dated: 
2 
JEFFREYD. GARDIN 
Recorder, Armed Services 
Board of Contract Appeals