ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 
Appeals of -- ) 
) 
MULE Engineering, Inc. ) 
) 
Under Contract No. W9124M-14-C-0014 ) 
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 
ASBCA Nos. 60969, 60974, 60975 
Leonard W. Childs, Jr., Esq. 
Childs & Associates 
Savannah, GA 
Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 
Army Chief Trial Attorney 
LTC Joseph J. Jankunis, JA 
Trial Attorney 
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE HARTMAN 
The government admits and stipulates to entitlement in these three Board 
Rule 12.2 appeals.* The contracting officer has addressed quantum in both ASBCA 
Nos. 60969 and 60975 by providing the full requested relief in a unilateral contract 
Modification, No. POOOOI. ASBCA Nos. 60969 and 60975 are dismissed. ASBCA 
No. 60974 is sustained as to entitlement and returned to the parties for negotiation of 
quantum. 
Dated: 8 February 2017 
TERRENCE S. HARTMAN 
Administrative Judge 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 
* A decision under Board Rule 12.2 shall have no value as precedent, and in the 
absence of fraud, shall be final and conclusive and may not be appealed to the 
Board's appellate authority. 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60969, 60974, 60975, 
Appeals of MULE Engineering, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's 
Charter. 
Dated: 
JEFFREY D. GARDIN 
Recorder, Armed Services 
Board of Contract Appeals