ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 
Petitions of -- ) 
) 
Framaco-Epik-Metis, JV ) 
) 
) 
) 
Under Contract No. W912GB-10-C-0020 ) 
APPEARANCES FOR THE PETITIONER: 
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 
ASBCA Nos. 60359-962, 60360-963 
60361-964, 60362-965 
60363-966 
Robert M. Moore, Esq. 
Robert D. Windus, Esq. 
Moore & Lee, LLP 
McLean, VA 
Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 
Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 
Brett R. Howard, Esq. 
Engineer Trial Attorney 
U.S. Army Engineer District, Europe 
DISMISSAL ORDER 
The contractor filed, under Rule l(a)(5), a request for an order directing the 
contracting officer to render a decision on its five claims, all of which were submitted 
between 3 October 2013 and 22 April 2015. In a conference call on 26 February 2016, 
petitioner's counsel informed the Board that the claim underlying the first of its 
petitions, ASBCA No. 60359-962, had been withdrawn, and that the contracting 
officer had issued final decisions on the claims underlying the remaining four 
petitions, ASBCA Nos. 60360-963, 60361-964, 60362-965, and 60363-966. In light 
of these circumstances, neither party objected to the petitions being dismissed as moot. 
Accordingly, the Board dismisses the captioned petitions as moot. 
Dated: 2 March 2016 
~ 7£/--m MARKN.frt~ 
Administrative Judge 
Acting Chairman 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order Pursuant to Rule l(a)(5) of 
the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60359-962, 60360-963, 
60361-964, 60362-965, and 60363-966, Petitions ofFramaco-Epik-Metis, JV, rendered 
in conformance with the Board's Charter. 
Dated: 
2 
JEFFREY D. GARDIN 
Recorder, Armed Services 
Board of Contract Appeals