ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 
Appeal of -- ) 
) 
Rice King II, Inc. ) 
) 
Under Contract No. NNA 250-02-D-OO 14 ) 
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 
ASBCA No. 60804 
Mr. Ted Yoon 
President 
Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 
Navy Chief Trial Attorney 
Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq. 
Trial Attorney 
ORDER OF DISMISSAL 
By correspondence dated 16 September 2016, an individual named Wanli Peng 
filed a notice of appeal from the alleged termination of a Navy Exchange Service contract 
to operate Asian fast food restaurants at NAS Whidbey Island, Oak Harbor, Washington. 
The appeal was docketed on 20 September 2016. 
By Order dated 23 September 2016, the Board explained the requirements of 
Board Rule 15(a) respecting the eligibility criteria for an appellant's representative, 
advised that Wanli Peng was not identified in the 
record as a corporate officer or 
attorney, and directed appellant to show that it was represented in the appeal by a person 
meeting the criteria of Rule l 5(a) or to designate a proper person as its representative. 
The Board's 23 September 2016 was mailed to the address provided in the notice of 
appeal. The Board received no response. The Board issued a second Order on 
22 December 2016, again to the mailing address provided in the notice of appeal. The 
Board's 22 December 2016 Order was returned to the Board with the envelope marked 
"RETURN TO SENDER" and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." 
On 6 January 2017, the government transmitted to the Board an initial Rule 4 file 
consisting of the "master contract, modifications, and the specific delivery order and 
modifications for the location at issue." The contract and relevant modifications 
identified Mr. Ted Yoon as President of Rice King II, Inc., and included contact 
information (R4, tabs 1, 7). 
By Order dated 31 January 2017, addressed to Mr. Yoon, the Board directed the 
contractor to advise the Board whether it wished to proceed with the appeal, and if so, the 
contractor was further directed to show that it was represented in this appeal by a person 

meeting the criteria of Board Rule 15(a) or to designate a proper person as its 
representative. The contractor did not respond. 
By Order dated 21 March 2017, addressed to Mr. Yoon, the Board again directed 
the contractor to advise the Board whether it wished to proceed with the appeal, and if so, 
to show that it was properly represented. The contractor was informed that if it did not 
comply by 5 April 2017 the Board might dismiss the appeal without further notice. 
The contractor has not responded. Without a representative meeting the criteria of 
Board Rule 15(a), the Board is unable to proceed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 
Dated: 18 April 2017 
I concur 
fil:iiir:FORD 
Administrative Judge 
Vice Chairman 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 
2 
;:/MARK N. STEMPER 
Administrative Judge 
Acting Chairman 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 
CRAIG S. LARKE 
Administr tive Judge 
Armed Services Board 
of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 
Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60804, Appeal of Rice King II, Inc., 
rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 
Dated: 
3 
JEFFREY D. GARDIN 
Recorder, Armed Services 
Board of Contract Appeals