text: Hes right that the consensus is real (among government funded climate scientists). But thats not evidence about the climate, its evidence about scientific processes, monopoly science, and university culture not the climate. The problem for Manne is that this assumes that 1/ science-the-human-practice is uncorruptible, and 2/ scientists are unaffected by human ambitions, money, fame, bias or ...uh... simple error. Can humans be human? We skeptics think so.