text: Further, he engages in the breathless confusion or conflation of "he real 'inconvenient truth' about climate change is that some people are losing their rights and freedoms because of the actions of othersin either the quality of the air they breathe, the geography they hold dear (, the insurance costs they bear or the future environment of the children they love". Leave for now the tiresome invocation of children in these debates to distract from substantive discussion, and the obvious use of "climate change" by insurance companies to raise rates, including on equally faulty models as those used to project climate calamity. In truth, "climate change"involving non-pollutant greenhouse gases water vapor, carbon dioxide and methaneis simply not an issue about "air quality". If the matter is so serious, then it deserves attention to the facts. Speaking of facts, one also senses a bit of the abused-Republican syndrome in the unacceptable "The fact is, I'm a conservative and a conservationist -- and that's okay." Please, enough of the Poor Man's Shuffle on these matters; wealthier is healthier, and the pro-growth agenda has proven to be better for the planet than statism.